FCC Web Documents citing 1.13

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-177A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-177A1.pdf
  • (Mar. 22, 2006). Our rules contemplate that notice of debarment will be provided within 90 days of receipt of information submitted by the respondent in response to a suspension notice. 47 C.F.R. § 54.521(e)(5). Premio filed its Petition on March 27, 2006; 90 days thereafter was June 27, 2006. We may waive our own rules pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.13 in the public interest. To allow the Commission to have a full opportunity to analyze this matter, we hereby waive the 90 day rule as it applies to Premio, Inc.'s responsive pleading, filed March 27, 2006. NextiraOne, LLC, Notice of Debarment and Order Denying Waiver Petition, FCC 06-126 (rel. Jan. 22, 2007). See Letter from W. Kenneth Ferree, Esq. and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1184A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1184A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1184A1.txt
  • deemed acceptance of the conditions set forth herein. 17. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this authorization, issued pursuant to Section 0.261 of the Commission's rules, is effective upon release. Petitions for reconsideration under Section 1.106 or applications for review under Section 1.115 of the Commission's rules may be filed within 30 days of public notice of this Order (see Section 1.13). FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Rebecca Arbogast Chief Telecommunications Division International Bureau 47 U.S.C. § 214. 47 C.F.R. § 63.18. See Wiltel International, Inc., 9 FCC Rcd 5806 (1994) (authorizing Sprint to lease and operate one E-1 circuit (30 64-Kbps circuits) and to provide all authorized services between the United States and Cuba); Sprint Communications L.P., 9 FCC Rcd 2827 (1994) (authorizing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-868A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-868A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-868A1.txt
  • deemed acceptance of the conditions set forth herein. 20. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this authorization, issued pursuant to Section 0.261 of the Commission's Rules, is effective upon release. Petitions for reconsideration under Section 1.106 or applications for review under Section 1.115 of the Commission's Rules may be filed within 30 days of public notice of this order (see Section 1.13). FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Rebecca Arbogast Chief Telecommunications Division International Bureau 47 U.S.C. § 214. See File No. ITC-214-19990303-00103. CIC is regulated as dominant on the U.S.-Dominican Republic route. See International Authorizations Granted, Report No. TEL-00140 (rel. October 1, 1999) (Public Notice granting CIC global authorization to provide facilities-based and resale service, subject to dominant carrier regulation on the U.S.-Dominican Republic
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.txt
  • can make a recommendation, if needed, regarding how the TT&C requirements for FSS systems operating above 17 GHz can best be satisfied, while keeping in mind the necessary reliability and flexibility needed for FSS systems to perform TT&C operations. (04.16.01) Document: IWG-4/003 11 April 2001 WRC-2003 Advisory Committee Informal Working Group 4 (IWG-4) IWG-4 DRAFT PRELIMINARY VIEWS On Agenda Item 1.13 WRC-2003 Agenda Item 1.13: to consider regulatory provisions and possible identification of existing frequency allocations for services which may be used by high altitude platform stations, taking into account No. S5.543A and the results of the ITU-R studies conducted in accordance with Resolutions 122 (Rev.WRC-2000) and 734/[COM5/14] (WRC-2000); ISSUE: Matters related to high-altitude platform stations in the fixed and mobile
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2436A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2436A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2436A1.txt
  • messenger-delivered paper filings only at our Capitol Heights facility located at 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. To accommodate this change in location, the time deadline for filing at the Capitol Heights facility is extended hereafter to 9:00 PM Eastern Time. Filings received at the Capitol Heights facility will be date-stamped. Filings made pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.13(a) should also be made at the Capitol Heights facility where they will be date and time stamped. Subpoenas directed to the Commission or its employees in their official capacities will be received only at the Capitol Heights facility. The Commission is currently looking for an alternative site in Washington, D.C., to accept delivery of filings on a more permanent basis.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.txt
  • suitable epfd( , epfd( and off-axis e.i.r.p. density limits; instructs the Director of the BR 2 to report the results of these studies to WRC-0306. Reason: To allow additional time for the completion of the necessary ITU-R studies. III. Informal Working Group 4: Fixed Service/Fixed-Satellite Service Sharing DRAFT PROPOSAL FOR THE WORK OF THE CONFERENCE Doc. WAC/144(05.09.02) WRC-03 Agenda Item 1.13: to consider regulatory provisions and possible identification of existing frequency allocations for services which may be used by high altitude platform stations, taking into account No. 5.543A and the results of the ITU-R studies conducted in accordance with Resolutions 122 (Rev.WRC-2000) and 734 (WRC-2000); Background: At WRC-97, the bands 47.2-47.5 GHz and 47.9-48.2 GHz (which were already allocated for the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2512A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2512A2.txt
  • and (ii) available in substantially similar form and on commercially reasonable terms through communications services of companies other than Domestic Communications Companies. 1.11 "Effective Date" means the date on which the transactions contemplated by the Stock Purchase Agreement are consummated and Telmex acquires the stock of X0. 1.12 "Electronic Communication" has the meaning given it in 18 U.S.C. $ 2510(12). 1.13 "Electronic Surveillance" means (a) the interception of wire, oral, or electronic communications as defined in 18 U.S.C. $6 2510(l), (2), (4) and (12), respectively, and electronic surveillance as defined in 50 U.S.C. 5 1801(f); (b) access to stored wire or electronic communications, as referredto in 18 U.S.C. 4 2701 et seq.; (c) acquisition of dialing or signaling information through pen
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3121A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3121A3.txt
  • to the termination of international undersea cables, provided that such equipment is utilized solely to effectuate the operation of undersea transport network(s) outside of the United States and in no manner controls land-based transport network@) or their associated systems in the United states. 1.12. Purchase Agreement are consummated. "Effective Date" means the date on which the transactions contemplated by the 1.13. "Electronic Communication" has the meaning given it in 18 U.S.C. 0 2510(12). 1.14. "Electronic Surveillance" means: (a) the interception of wire, oral, or electronic communications as defined in 18 U.S.C. $0 2510(4), (I), (2), and (12), respectively, and electronic surveillance as defined in 50 U.S.C. $ 1801(f); (b) access to stored wire or electronic communications, as referred to in 18
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.txt
  • of adjacent and nearby allocations to the active and passive services, while also calling for completion of the unfinished work under Recommendation 66 (Rev. WRC-2000). DRAFT PROPOSAL FOR THE WORK OF THE CONFERENCE Doc. WAC/172(08.01.03) (NTIA proposes modification of the Draft Proposal from Informal Working Group 4 that appeared in Public Notice DA-02-2361, Released September 24, 2002.) WRC-03 Agenda Item 1.13: to consider regulatory provisions and possible identification of existing frequency allocations for services which may be used by high altitude platform stations, taking into account No. 5.543A and the results of the ITU-R studies conducted in accordance with Resolutions 122 (Rev.WRC-2000) and 734 (WRC-2000); Background Information: At WRC-97, the bands 47.2-47.5 GHz and 47.9-48.2 GHz (which were already allocated for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1698A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1698A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1698A1.txt
  • consider identification of additional spectrum for HF broadcasting between 4-10 MHz per Resolution 544. In particular focus has been given to the following bands: 4 500-4 650 kHz 5 060-5 250 kHz 5 840-5 900 kHz 7 350-7 650 kHz 9 290-9 400 kHz 9 900-9 940 kHz, BACKGROUND: There are three separate issues to be addressed within agenda item 1.13. Each Resolution, although related due to possible impact to systems, will be studied in a separate ITU-R WP as the primary lead. The commonality between these items comes in the form of interested ITU-R WPs: Resolution 729 is a hold-over from WRC-97 and has not been successfully completed at this time. The lead group is WP 9C. Resolution 351 from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1698A1_Erratum.doc
  • consider identification of additional spectrum for HF broadcasting between 4-10 MHz per Resolution 544. In particular focus has been given to the following bands: 4 500-4 650 kHz 5 060-5 250 kHz 5 840-5 900 kHz 7 350-7 650 kHz 9 290-9 400 kHz 9 900-9 940 kHz, BACKGROUND: There are three separate issues to be addressed within agenda item 1.13. Each Resolution, although related due to possible impact to systems, will be studied in a separate ITU-R WP as the primary lead. The commonality between these items comes in the form of interested ITU-R WPs: Resolution 729 is a hold-over from WRC-97 and has not been successfully completed at this time. The lead group is WP 9C. Resolution 351 from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2607A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2607A1.txt
  • the radiation hazard and including a diagram showing the regions around the earth station where the radiation levels could exceed 1.0 mW/cm2. The operator of the earth station shall be responsible for assuring that individuals do not stray into the regions around the earth station where there is a potential for exceeding the maximum permissible exposure limits required by Section 1.13 10 of our Rules, 47 C.F.R. tj 1.13 10. This shall be accomplished by means of signs, caution tape, verbal warnings, placement of the earth station so as to minimize access to the hazardous region and/or any other appropriate me ans . e. In the event of a report of harmhl interference resulting from the use of the earth station,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2668A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2668A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2668A2.txt
  • to effectuate the operation of undersea transport network(s) outside of the United States and in no manner controls land-based transport network(s) or their associated systems in the United States. 1.11 ``Effective Date'' means the date on which the FCC grants the application in FCC File No. ITC-214-20030728-00376. 1.12 ``Electronic Communication'' has the meaning given it in 18 U.S.C. § 2510(12). 1.13 ``Electronic Surveillance'' means (a) the interception of wire, oral, or electronic communications as defined in 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510(1), (2), (4) and (12), respectively, and electronic surveillance as defined in 50 U.S.C. § 1801(f); (b) access to stored wire or electronic communications, as referred to in 18 U.S.C. § 2701 et seq.; (c) acquisition of dialing, routing, addressing, or signaling
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3553A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3553A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3553A1.txt
  • = 0.3 Vehicle 30% 0% 100% 0.3 * 1 = 0.3 Indoor 40% 100% 50% 0.4 * 0.5 = 0.2 Sum 0.3 + 0.3 + 0.2 = 0.8 average vocoder power reduction (dB): 10log(0.8) = 0.97 See discussion of mobile-terminal antenna gain in ¶¶ 52-55, infra. ATC Report and Order at ¶¶ 142, 145, 147, 167, and Appendix C2 § 1.13. Id., Appendix C2 § 2.1.1. MSV ATC Application at 18 and Appendix I. . ATC Report and Order at Appendix C2 § 2.1.1. ATC Report and Order at ¶ 143. Moreover, in the event MSV is in a position to deploy and operate more than the number of co-frequency U.S. base stations permitted by this Order before the Commission issues
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2481A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2481A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2481A1.txt
  • reference situation that will be used to verify compatibility with allotments and assignments resulting from the conversion of allotments is based only on List A. In the case that category of- ``subregional systems'' is maintained, the treatment of submissions being proposed for ``additional uses'' would apply to both additional uses and subregional systems. II. Draft Proposal on WRC-07 Agenda Item 1.13 received from the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA): Document WAC/062(14.09.05): DRAFT PROPOSAL FOR THE WORK OF THE CONFERENCE Agenda Item 1.13: taking into account Resolutions 729 (WRC-97), 351 (WRC-03) and 544 (WRC-03), to review the allocations to all services in the HF bands between 4 MHz and 10 MHz, excluding those allocations to services in the frequency range 7
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-476A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-476A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-476A1.txt
  • the Radio Regulations to protect these feeder link earth stations from future terrestrial frequency assignments within a primary service. Specifically, a coordination zone should be established around each feeder link earth station that would provide protection from future terrestrial primary frequency assignments. INFORMAL WORKING GROUP 4 (IWG-4) Broadcasting and Amateur Issues Document WAC/033(23.02.05): DRAFT PRELIMINARY VIEWS ON WRC-07 Agenda Item 1.13: taking into account Resolutions 729 (WRC-97), 351 (WRC-03) and 544 (WRC-03), to review the allocations to all services in the HF bands between 4 MHz and 10 MHz, excluding those allocations to services in the frequency range 7 000-7 200 kHz and those bands whose allotment plans are in Appendices 25, 26 and 27 and whose channeling arrangements are in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.txt
  • is noted that the work under Resolution 951 (WRC-03) is related to TWIMs, there is no time limit to the studies under Recommendation 722 (WRC-03), and they may continue in the time after WRC-07 and leading up to WRC-10. INFORMAL WORKING GROUP 4 (IWG-4) Broadcasting and Amateur Issues Document WAC/137(04.10.06): DRAFT PROPOSAL FOR THE WORK OF THE CONFERENCE Agenda Item 1.13: taking into account Resolutions 729 (WRC-97), 351 (WRC-03) and 544 (WRC-03), to review the allocations to all services in the HF bands between 4 MHz and 10 MHz, excluding those allocations to services in the frequency range 7 000-7 200 kHz and those bands whose allotment plans are in Appendices 25, 26 and 27 and those whose channeling arrangements are
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-202A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-202A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-202A1.txt
  • 010-2 025 MHz and 2 160-2 170 MHz in Region 2 by the fixed and mobile-satellite services and associated transition arrangements X RESOLUTION 728 (Rev.WRC-2000) Studies relating to consideration of allocations in the broadcasting band 470-862 MHz to non-geostationary mobile-satellite services X RESOLUTION 729 (WRC-97) Use of frequency adaptive systems in the MF and HF bands X WRC-07 Agenda Item 1.13 RESOLUTION 731 (WRC-2000) Consideration by a future competent world radiocommunication conference of issues dealing with sharing and adjacent-band compatibility between passive and active services above 71 GHz X WRC-10 Agenda Item 2.7 RESOLUTION 732 (WRC-2000) Consideration by a future competent world radiocommunication conference of issues dealing with sharing between active services above 71 GHz tion and aircraft earth station licences
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-860A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-860A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-860A1.txt
  • of our public interest analysis under section 310(b)(4) of the Act and the Commission's foreign ownership policies adopted in the Foreign Participation Order. We find that the foreign equity and voting interests held indirectly in TelCove FWL through BHP, IBMF, and Quant are properly ascribed to WTO Member countries. As noted above, BHP, IBMF, and Quant respectively hold 20.37 percent, 1.13 percent, and 2.22 percent equity and voting interests in TelCove. According to the record, three institutional investors organized in the Cayman Islands and Switzerland hold a nine percent equity and voting interest in BHP, which itself is a foreign-organized entity. Five institutional investors organized in Switzerland, France, and Japan hold a 17 percent interest in IBMF, which also is a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.txt
  • WRC-07, to resume, as appropriate, the application of Nos. 5.311 (as revised by WRC-07), 9.34 and 11.30 and other relevant associated provisions of the Radio Regulations,.instructs the Secretary-General to bring this Resolution to the attention of the Regional Radiocommunication Conference, 2004/2005 (RRC-04/05) Document WAC/104(27.04.06): From: Chairman & Vice Chairman, IWG-4 To: Chair, FCC WAC-2007 Board Subject: Non-census on Agenda Item 1.13 IWG-4 has held 13 meetings since its inception, about 10 of these included extensive work and discussion as it pertains to ITU-R Res.544 (WRC-03) portion for WRC-07 Agenda Item 1.13 taking into account Resolutions 729 (WRC-97), 351 (WRC-03) and 544 (WRC-03), to review the allocations to all services in the HF bands between 4 MHz and 10 MHz, excluding those
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1564A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1564A2.txt
  • Undesired Signal Relative to That with Bandlimited Gaussian Noise D/U Ratio Relative to Baseline (dB) Channel Offset A3 D3 I1 J1 M1 N1 O1 G4 Mean (dB) (Excluding G4) Standard Deviation (dB) (Excluding G4) N-6 -0.87 -0.08 0.24 0.17 -0.78 -0.23 -0.54 -1.47 -0.30 0.44 N-4 -0.94 -0.1 1.92 0.04 -0.74 -0.43 -0.54 -0.87 -0.11 0.96 N-3 -0.53 -0.53 0.09 -1.13-0.52-5.44-0.53 0.49 -1.23 1.89 N-2 -0.54 -0.15 0.2 -0.09-0.05 -0.08 0.00 -0.08 -0.10 0.22 N+2 0.12 -2.37 -0.57 0.26 0.43 0.11 0.24 -1.53 -0.25 0.99 Mean -0.55 -0.65 0.38 -0.15-0.33 -1.21 -0.27 -0.69 -0.40 (-0.25) Std Dev 0.42 0.98 0.92 0.56 0.52 2.37 0.37 0.88 1.09 (0.66) Note: The overall means and standard deviations (lower right corner of the chart) exclude
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A5.txt
  • factor change in the other direction, we just take the antilog of -1 multiplied by the parameter estimate. For example, if the inflated model shows a parameter estimate of 0.12, the interpretation is either that a unit change in the covariate increases the odds a station will air no informational programming II - 17 by a factor of exp(0.12) or 1.13, or that a unit change in the covariate decreases the odds a station will air some informational programming by a factor of exp(-0.12) or 0.89. The overall marginal effect, presented in the last column, represents the predicted increase or decrease in the expected quantity of informational programming (in seconds) over a two-hour period that would result from a unit increase
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • Commercial, In-Market, Edison Surveyed Stations Variable Mean Median Min Max N CPP, AM Drive 106.73 44.00 8.00 979.00 555 CPP, Evening 63.06 30.00 3.00 550.00 555 CPP, Average 95.85 41.00 7.00 859.00 555 CPM, AM Drive 11.08 9.58 4.25 38.33 555 CPM, Evening 8.54 6.18 3.04 51.58 555 CPM, Average 10.55 8.99 4.86 34.84 555 Adult AQH Rating, AM Drive 1.13 0.78 0.00 11.57 427 Adult AQH Rating, Evening 0.28 0.21 0.00 2.54 417 Adult AQH Rating, Average 0.87 0.65 0.00 6.18 417 Number of Sisters in Market 3.05 3.00 0.00 10.00 569 Number of Commercial Stations in Market 30.07 27.00 4.00 88.00 569 Market HHI 0.16 0.15 0.04 1.00 569 Percentage of Stations with Cross-Owned Newspaper in Market 0.01 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A7.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A7.txt
  • Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Adjusted R-squared .10 .17 .24 .65 .86 Notes: Absolute values of t-statistics in parentheses (using heteroscedastic-consistent standard errors corrected for clustering by television station); ***p<.01, **p<.05 and *p<.10. 36 Table 4: Local News Coverage Including Sports and Weather (in seconds) Independent variables (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Local station ownership Cross-owned newspaper 46.9 (0.91) 77.2 (1.13) 50.5 (0.89) 91.6 (1.63) 78.8** (1.98) Cross-owned radio station -307.8** (2.56) -255.0** (2.16) -167.1* (1.89) -76.5 (1.20) Cross-owned radio and newspaper 124.2 (0.80) 190.1 (1.38) 143.4 (1.23) 23.0 (0.26) Parent company coverage of all television households (%) 17.3*** (3.70) 14.4*** (3.28) 3.4 (1.02) Network owned and operated -185.5* (1.70) -231.4* (1.94) -17.0 (0.18) Network affiliation (omitted category is CW\MyNetwork) ABC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A8.txt
  • 8.85 53 RealEstate,Rental,Leasing 20.60 63.67 15.73 54 Professional,ScientiÖc,TechnicalServices 19.09 71.82 9.09 55 ManagementofCompanies&Enterprises Administrative&Support&Waste 12.09 79.80 8.10 56 Management&RemediationService 20.86 64.73 14.41 61 EducationalServices 39.47 41.85 18.68 62 HealthCare&SocialAssistance 23.78 68.57 7.65 71 Arts,Entertainment&Recreation 21.21 62.74 16.05 72 Accommodation&FoodServices 21.10 58.12 20.78 81 OtherServices(exceptpublic) 22.70 61.35 15.95 AllNon-FarmBusinesses 17.74 68.41 13.85 6 Table2:OwnershipbyRaceandEthnicity Percent NAICSName HispanicWhiteBlackAmIndAsian 22 Utilities 0.85 96.79 1.13 0.89 1.44 23 Construction 3.57 97.15 1.24 0.68 1.04 31-33 Manufacturing 3.57 94.57 0.72 0.48 4.09 42 WholesaleTrade 3.84 91.40 0.60 0.25 7.57 44-45 RetailTrade 3.60 89.55 1.22 0.42 8.58 48-49 Transportation&Warehousing 5.60 94.07 2.99 0.54 2.10 51 Information 2.82 93.04 2.07 0.40 4.33 515112 RadioStations 3.71 93.29 4.35 0.17 2.27 515120 TVStations 6.04 89.11 4.89 0.00 6.03 511110 NewspaperPublishers
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-150A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-150A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-150A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 08-150 Released: January 24, 2008 FCC'S OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL REMINDS LITIGANTS OF REQUIREMENTS TO INVOKE THE JUDICIAL LOTTERY PROCEDURE A Commission rule, 47 C.F.R. § 1.13 (2006), specifies the requirements that a person filing a petition for review of a Commission order must satisfy to invoke the so-called judicial ``lottery'' procedure of 28 U.S.C. § 2112(a). Under certain circumstances, that statute establishes a system of random selection - a lottery - to determine which court will review a Commission order when petitions for review of that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A2.txt
  • 495-1800kHz Allocationtoservices Region1 Region2 Region3 495-505 MOBILE5.82A Amateur 5.82B 505-510 MARITIMEMOBILE MARITIMEMOBILE5.79 MARITIMEMOBILE5.795.79A 5.795.79A5.84 AmateurADD5.[AMl 5.84 AERONAUTICAL AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION RADIONAVIGATION AmateurADD5.[AMl AeronauticalMobile LandMobile AmateurADD5.[AMl 5.72 510-526.5 510-525 510-526.5 MARITIMEMOBILE MOBILE5.79A5.84 MARITIMEMOBILE5.795.79A 5.795.79A5.84 AERONAUTICAL 5.84 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION RADIONAVIGATION AeronauticalMobile LandMobile ADD USAfAI1.23/2 19 5.[AM]:Administrationsauthorizingtheuseoffrequenciesintheband505-510kHzbythe amateurserviceshallensurethatnoharmfulinterferenceiscausedtotheotherservicesinthis bandortotheserviceshavingallocationsintheadjacentbands,notinginparticulartheconditions foruseofthefrequencies490kHzand518kHz,asprescribedinarticles 31and52. Reasons:Themaritimeandamateurcommunitiessupportthecontinueduse415-526.5kHzfor theexistingmaritimeservicesandotherexistingservices.Amateurradiotelegraphymayshare segmentsofthespectrumbetween495and510kHzutilizingalistenbeforetransmitprotocol withoutinterferingwithexistingservices.Atleast5kHzseparationisaffordedtoNAVTEX operation. 20 SpaceServices 21 DOCUMENTWAC/047(Ol.09.09) UnitedStatesofAmerica DRAFTPROPOSALFORTHEWORKOFTHECONFERENCE WRC-11AgendaItem:1.13toconsidertheresultsofITU-Rstudiesinaccordancewith Resolution55l(WRC-07)anddecideonthespectrumusageofthe21.4-22GHzbandforthe broadcasting-satelliteserviceandtheassociatedfeeder-linkbandsinRegions 1and3; Backgroundinformation: IntheU.S.,the23GHzbandiswidelyusedinurbanareasformanyapplications.Theprimary onesareforbackhaulingwirelesstelephonetrafficandforcarryingbusinessdataand communicationsincorporatenetworks.Thepropagationcharacteristicsat23GHzmakeit particularlysuitableforwirelessbackhauloverrelativelyshortdistances.Theselinksprovide connectivitybetweenmobilecelltowersandthecentralnetworkfacilitiesofthelocalcarrier. Thegrowingsophisticationofend-userwirelessdevicesandservices,fromcellphonesto advancedwirelessservicesandfromvoicetomusicandtoreal-timevideo,contributesto increasesindemandforbackhaulcapacity.Atthesametime,aswirelessproviderscontinue subdividingtheircellstoextractmaximumusagefromcostlyspectrum,thenumberoftowers requiringbackhaulincreasesinproportion.Thebandprovidesavitalresourceformeetingthis need.AsofJune2007,thereweremorethan4500assignmentsinthesub-band21.4-22GHzin theU.S.alone.TherearenumerousdeploymentsinthisfrequencybandinotherRegion2 countriesaswell.ItisthereforeimperativetoensurethatWRC-lladoptregulatorysolution(s) thatpreservethebasicprincipleofequalitytospectrumaccessinallRegionsconsistentwithNo. 4.8. WARC-92allocatedtheBSSinRegionsIand3inthe21.4-22GHzbandwith1April 2007asthedateofentryintoforceoftheallocation.ItalsoadoptedResolution525which providedinterimproceduresfortheintroduction,beforeandafter1April2007,ofhighdefinition televisionsystems(HDTV)ofthebroadcasting-satelliteservice(BSS)intheband21.4-22.0GHz inRegions1and3onafirst-come-first-servedbasis.Resolution525hasbeenrevisedseveral timessince1992.Priorto1April2007,inRegions1and3,aninterimcoordinationprocedure appliedtooperationalBSS(HDTV)systemsintheband21.4-22.0GHzfortheprotectionof terrestrialservicesoperatinginthesamebandbasedonpfdcoordinationthresholds.WRC-07 modifiedResolution525byremovingprotectionofterrestrialnetworksandremovingthe proceduresofNo. 9.11.However,sinceResolution525isappliedbyfootnote5.530,which appearstotherightofthebroadcasting-satelliteserviceallocationsinRegions1and3,the Resolution525(Rev.WRC-07)provisionsdonotapplytoanyserviceinRegion2.(SeeNo. 5.50and5.51).Thus,theproceduresfortheprotectionofterrestrialservicesinRegion2from theBSSinRegions1and3arenotaddressedinResolution525. WithregardtoRegion2,thecoordinationrequirementsfortheBSSsystemsthatwere introducedinthe21.4-22GHzbandpriorto1April2007areexplicitlyclear.Inter-Regional 22 protectionoftheFSwasprovidedbyResolution33(Rev.WRC-03)whichincludeda coordinationprocedureapplicableinallfrequencybandsallocatedtotheBSS.TheWRC-03 versionofResolution525(Rev.WRC-03)wasconsistentwithResolution33(Rev.WRC-03)in thatthesesystemsaresubjecttoNo.9.11coordinationprocedures.Resolution525(Rev.WRC- 03)requiredcoordinationifthepowerflux-densityattheEarth'ssurfaceproducedbyemissions fromaspacestation,ontheterritoryofanyothercountry,exceeded: -115dB(W/m2)inany1MHzbandforanglesofarrivalbetween00and50above thehorizontalplane;or -105dB(W/m2)inany1MHzbandforanglesofarrivalbetween250and 900 abovethehorizontalplane;or valuestobederivedbylinearinterpolationbetweentheselimitsforanglesofarrival between 50and250abovethehorizontalplane. Thesethresholdvaluesfortriggeringcoordinationwithterrestrialservicesareconsistent withreferencepowerfluxdensityfortheBSSvaluesthathavebeendevelopedandgivenin RecommendationITU-RBO.1776.Theyarealsoconsistentwiththepowerflux-densitylimits recommendedforthisbandinRecommendationITU-RF.760.Itisimportanttorecognizethat theITU-RBO.1776isreferencedinResolutions525(Rev.WRC-07)and551(Rev.WRC-07). ThecoordinationrequirementsfortheBSSsystemsinthe21.4-22.0GHzband introducedafter1April2007inrespecttoterrestrialservicesofRegion2areconflictingand ambiguous.Resolution525(Rev.WRC-07),asdiscussedpreviously,onlyappliestoRegions1 and3whileResolution33(Rev.WRC-03)appliesforinter-Regionalcoordination,butithasno
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-763A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-763A2.txt
  • and mobile services. The United States supports a new SRS (Earth-to-space) primary allocation in the band 22.55-23.15 GHz taking into account the results of ITU-R studies, including those which apply to unwanted emissions from the envisioned SRS application into the part of the ISS allocation above 23.15GHz. 46 Document WAC/021(31.03.09) UNITED STATES DRAFT PRELIMINARY VIEWS ON WRC-11 WRC-11 Agenda Item: 1.13 to consider the results of ITU-R studies in accordance with Resolution 551 (WRC-07) and decide on the spectrum usage of the 21.4-22 GHz band for the broadcasting-satellite service and the associated feeder-link bands in Regions 1 and 3; ISSUE: This agenda item is focused primarily on the implementation of the 21.4-22 GHz band for BSS in ITU Regions 1 and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-763A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-763A3.txt
  • taking into account Resolutions 731 (WRC-2000) and 732 (WRC-2000); d) Agenda Item 1.11 (Space Research Service (Earth-to-space) systems within the band 22.55-23.15 GHz); e) Agenda Item 1.12 (Resolution 754 (WRC-07) ­ Consideration of modification of the aeronautical component of the mobile service allocation in the 37-38 GHz band for protection of other primary services in the band); f) Agenda Item 1.13 (Resolution 551 (WRC-07) ­ Use of the band 21.4-22 GHz for broadcasting-satellite service and associated feeder-link bands in Regions 1 and 3); g) Agenda Item 1.19 (Resolution 956 (WRC-07) ­ Regulatory measures and their relevance to enable the introduction of software-defined radio and cognitive radio systems); h) Agenda Item 1.20 (Resolution 734 (WRC-07) ­ Studies for spectrum identification for gateway
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2032A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2032A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2032A1.txt
  • a 0.12 percent share of total viewing hours (0.07 reported share + 0.05 standard error) and a net weekly circulation of 4.62 percent (2.66 reported share + 1.96 standard error). For the second year, the submitted data indicates that KSAT-TV has no measurable audience shares. For WOAI-TV, for the first year, the submitted results show that the station attains a 1.13 percent share of total viewing hours (0.63 reported share + 0.50 standard error) and a net weekly circulation of 14.00 percent (8.88 reported share + 5.12 standard error). For the second year, the submitted data indicates that WOAI-TV has no measurable audience shares. For significant viewing purposes, network stations, such as KENS-TV, KSAT-TV and WOAI-TV, must exceed an average 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-284A1.txt
  • Customer Mean S.E. Mean S.E. Mean S.E. Mean S.E. Mean S.E. Sample groups overall 2009 761 $46.14 0.85 $33.69 0.81 $31.10 0.51 730 $23.94 0.74 $25.89 0.70 2008 739 $46.23 0.79 $32.38 0.77 $29.61 0.46 711 $23.11 0.60 $25.99 0.67 Noncompetitive communities 2009 349 $46.71 1.21 $33.52 1.15 $30.65 0.69 322 $23.01 1.06 $24.01 0.99 2008 327 $46.87 1.16 $32.54 1.13 $29.68 0.66 303 $21.72 0.84 $23.92 0.96 All Effective Competition Communities 2009 412 $44.92 0.71 $34.06 0.63 $32.05 0.63 408 $25.85 0.64 $29.77 0.66 2008 412 $44.91 0.45 $32.08 0.40 $29.47 0.40 408 $25.84 0.61 $30.07 0.62 Second operator subgroup (all) 2009 140 $43.58 0.82 $33.43 0.74 $31.98 0.73 137 $32.46 1.15 $30.48 0.94 2008 140 $46.03 0.64 $33.46 0.75
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-447A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-447A3.txt
  • agreements and associated plans for the broadcasting-satellite service NOC RES 517 (Rev.WRC-07) Introduction of digitally modulated emissions in the high-frequency bands between 3 200 kHz and 26 100 kHz allocated to the broadcasting service NOC RES 525 (Rev.WRC-07) Introduction of high-definition television systems of the broadcasting-satellite service in the band 21.4 -22.0 GHz in Regions 1 and 3 SUP PER USPR-1.13 CITEL dated 15 Oct 2009 A reference is made to this Resolution in No.5.530. 1.13 ANNEX Interim procedures for the introduction of BSS (HDTV) systems in the band 21.4-22.0 GHz in Regions 1 and 3 SUP 1.13 RES 526 (WARC-92) Future adoption of procedures to ensure flexibility in the use of the frequency band allocated to the broadcasting-satellite service (BSS)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-447A3_Rcd.pdf
  • ncy bands bet ween 3 200 kHz and 26 100 kHz allocated to th e broa dcasting service NOC RES 525 (Rev .WRC-07 ) Introdu ctio n of high -defi nitio n television system s of the broa dcasting-satellite service i n the ba nd 21.4 - 22.0 G Hz i n R egions 1 an d 3 SUP PER USPR-1.13 CITEL da ted 15 Oct 2009 A referen ce i s m ade to this Resolution in No.5. 530. 1.13 ANNEX In terim pro cedures fo r th e in trodu ctio n of BSS ( HDTV ) sy stem s in the band 21. 4-22. 0 GHz in Regio ns 1 and 3 SUP 1.13 RES 526 (WARC- 92)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-63A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-63A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-63A1.txt
  • 28 of the United States Code governs which court will hear the consolidated case when petitions for review challenging the same Commission order are filed in two or more federal circuit courts of appeals. That statute establishes a system of random selection - a lottery - to determine which court will review the Commission order in those circumstances. Commission Rule 1.13, 47 C.F.R. § 1.13, specifies the requirements that a person filing a petition for review of a Commission order must satisfy to invoke the so-called judicial ``lottery'' procedure of 28 U.S.C. § 2112(a). These requirements are necessary to enable the Commission to fulfill its obligations under the statute to notify the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (which conducts the lottery)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-712A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-712A2.txt
  • Regions 1 and 2, in respect of BSS allocation in Region 3) 17.7-17.8 GHz (terrestrial services in all three Regions in respect of BSS allocation in Region 2) 17.3-17.8 GHz (transmitting earth stations in the FSS (Earth-to-space) in respect of BSS allocation in Region 2) (see Article 4 of Appendix 30A) [21.4-22 GHz (Regions 1 and 3) TBD under AI 1.13] 40.5-42.5 GHz 74-76 GHz i) Necessary bandwidths overlap; and ii) the power flux-density (pfd) of the interfering station at the edge of the BSS service area exceeds the permissible level Check by using the assigned frequencies and bandwidths See also Article 6 of Appendix 30 WAC/138(19.04.11) 33 Reason: The main updates to the Table are to remove the inter-dependency between
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-712A2_Rcd.pdf
  • issing BSS allocations are added (e.g., 40.5- 42.5 GHz). The 40 GHz BSS allocation is not referenced u nder No. 9.11 because li mit s are alr eady applied to that allocation thr ough Article 21. The 21.4- 22 GHz band has been removed from the No. 9.11 table entr y because the US has a proposal under Agenda Item 1.13 f or hard lim its for BSS under Article 21. ____ ___ ___ _____ ___ 6071
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-187A2_Rcd.pdf
  • Groups with Unserved Blocks Total Number of Tracts with Unserved Blocks Tota l Number of Counties with Unserved Blocks Number of CMAs with Unserved Blocks Total Population of Unserved Blocks Total Area (square miles) of Unserved Blocks PA 20,201 659 312 51 23 143,698 6,663 3.59 1,532.20 12,636.82 446.54 1.37 17.24 7.55 1,521.81 92.18 RI 11111 26 1 0.00 0.00 1.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SC 1,755 189 122 41 15 16,223 1,133 0.09 162.18 1,826.74 64.62 0.15 1.88 0.00 390.56 2.29 SD 1,279 47 31 26 7 5,216 4,864 0.00 199.23 2,592.62 360.93 0.04 2.78 0.00 204.50 0.87 TN 6,383 342 220 76 13 40,825 2,246 0.23 431.74 3,550.85 376.86 0.49 2.77 0.00 240.06 23.49 TX 37,096 535
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.txt
  • (1.48) Number of AM stations in contour -0.002 (0.97) -0.002 (0.89) -0.002 (0.84) Number of FM stations in market 0.000 (0.37) 0.000 (0.32) 0.000 (0.38) Number of FM stations in contour -0.002 (1.59) -0.002 (1.56) -0.002 (1.51) Number of commercial TV stations -0.001 (0.24) -0.001 (0.34) -0.000 (0.10) Number of digital radio stations in market 0.000 (0.86) 0.000 (0.71) 0.000 (1.13) Number of newspapers in market 0.003 (0.62) 0.003 (0.61) 0.003 (0.61) Population 18+ in market -0.000 (0.37) -0.000 (0.39) -0.000 (0.26) Retail expenditures in market -0.000 (0.40) -0.000 (0.46) -0.000 (0.20) Per capita income in market -0.000 (0.74) -0.000 (0.64) -0.000 (0.81) Constant -0.013 (5.81)** -0.013 (5.92)** -0.012 (5.57)** * - estimated regression coefficient is different from zero at the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-96-1752A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-96-1752A1.txt
  • concerned, however, that removal of the cable from the exclusion list would be inconsistent with certain conditions of the U.S. Department of State's support for grant of the CANUS-1 cable landing license. Specifically, the State Department requested the Commission to notify it of all Section 214 applications filed by common carriers, including Teleglobe, seeking to acquire or use capacity on CANUS-1.13 The Bureau noted that, due to the general nature of our global Section 214 authorizations, it would be impossible to know which applicants were planning to use the CANUS-1 cable. We therefore decided to include the CANUS-1 cable on the exclusion list until such time as we could complete consultations with the State Department on this issue. 6. On October
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-104945A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-104945A1.txt
  • returned to the respective companies data for which confidential treatment was sought. 16030 Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-158 TABLE 1 Ratio of costs of standard analog service to BRI ISDN service Ameritech Bell Atlantic NYNEX Pacific Bell US West Average ratio of costs Outside Plant (loop only) costs 1:1.07 1:1.01 1:0.85 1:1.05 1:0.80 1:0.96* All NTS costs 1:1.45 1:1.36 1:1.23 1:1.13 1:1.07 1:1.24* TABLE 2 Ratio of costs of standard analog service to PRI ISDN service Ameritech Bell Atlantic NYNEX Pacific Bell US West Average ratio of costs Outside Plant (loop only) costs 1:5.68 1:4.13 1:10.94 1:4.67 1:5.33 1:6.5* Outside Plant (loop only) costs (excluding NYNEX data) 1:5.68 1:4.13 excluded 1:4.67 1:5.33 1:4.95* All NTS costs 1:8.9 1:15.80 1:27.74 1:8.70 1:10.60
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • Resale International MTS in 1999 Percent Number of Number of U.S. Carrier of Total Messages Minutes Revenues IMTS Resale Revenues Access Authority, Inc. 9,762,704 69,902,160 $20,870,738 0.46% ACS Systems, Inc. d.b.a LD Exchange.com 44,781,532 203,974,633 58,847,458 1.30 ALLTEL Corporation 1,459,787 10,844,746 5,451,108 0.12 AT&T Corp. 141,932,631 884,898,390 254,016,193 5.61 BellSouth Corporation 34,045,495 106,471,859 28,799,468 0.64 Broadwing Companies 56,820,588 220,064,637 51,128,611 1.13 Business Telecom, Inc. (BTI) 9,102,584 45,516,432 12,553,650 0.28 CapRock Telecommunications Corporation 25,518,740 176,080,786 43,391,366 0.96 Capsule Communications d.b.a. US WATS, Inc. 10,394,537 29,554,920 8,751,116 0.19 Communication TeleSystems Int'l., d/b/a CTS and WorldxChange 150,245,283 1,032,966,114 192,876,638 4.26 DirectNet Telecommunications 50,822,341 272,088,214 75,924,324 1.68 eGlobe 3,148,536 30,418,884 7,549,525 0.17 Elephant Talk, Inc. 5,100,331 61,203,977 20,080,033 0.44 EqualNet Corporation 1,244,525 24,890,502 7,778,282 0.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-242532A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-242532A8.txt
  • 19,547 6,570 31,841 42,929 0.22 0.11 0.09 0.24 7 18 15 15 15Taiwan 2,201 27,413 1 29,615 14,811 0.08 0.06 0.12 0.29 1 19 14 11 8France 13,738 5,778 7,561 27,077 6,581 1.03 0.38 0.29 0.51 7 20 19 26 20India 3,529 23,029 0 26,558 3,121 0.15 0.18 0.40 0.46 7 21 20 20 19Philippines 10,642 8,814 634 20,090 10,754 1.13 1.16 1.11 1.59 6 22 23 21 24Colombia 4,008 6,851 5,220 16,079 2,911 0.33 0.32 0.31 0.58 6 23 22 23 21Venezuela 3,086 5,886 3,717 12,689 20,365 0.32 0.22 0.38 0.70 8 24 21 22 n.a.New Zealand 2,630 3,912 4,095 10,637 2,136 0.33 0.19 0.13 1.63 4 25 n.a. n.a. 27Dominican Republic 3,266 1,643 4,032 8,941 5,846 0.58 2.14 2.15
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243431A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243431A1.txt
  • W.L.), USABSS-5 (1 10 W.L.) and USABSS-6 (1 10 W.L.). The parameters ofthe networks submitted to the ITU, now available through the ITU in advance of their official Special Section publication, were used in the analysis. The results indicated that the USABSS-1M network at 110 W.L. was potentially affected by an exceedance of the OEPM criteria ranging from 0.07 to 1.13 dB depending on the channel and test point concerned. Only two of the 18 test points specified for USABSS- 1M showed a decrease in OEPM of more than 1 dB. For USABSS-1R at 101 W.L., the results indicated that network was potentially affected by an exceedance of the OEPM criteria ranging from 0.07 to 0.99 dEl depending on the channel
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-244685A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-244685A1.txt
  • W.L.), USABSS-5 (1 10 W.L.) and USABSS-6 (1 10 W.L.). The parameters ofthe networks submitted to the ITU, now available through the ITU in advance of their official Special Section publication, were used in the analysis. The results indicated that the USABSS-1M network at 110 W.L. was potentially affected by an exceedance of the OEPM criteria ranging from 0.07 to 1.13 dB depending on the channel and test point concerned. Only two of the 18 test points specified for USABSS- 1M showed a decrease in OEPM of more than 1 dB. For USABSS-1R at 101 W.L., the results indicated that network was potentially affected by an exceedance of the OEPM criteria ranging from 0.07 to 0.99 dEl depending on the channel
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.txt
  • 1.61 1967 39.7 114.2 54.6 59.6 23.4 31.8 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46.4 126.9 61.5 65.4 28.2 40.0 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 64.6 172.0 82.7 89.4 38.3 51.6 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81.1 196.6 98.9 97.7 51.0 59.8 2.43 1.22 1.21 1.17 1.19 1971 100.9 237.4 120.7 116.6 68.4 75.1 2.35 1.20 1.16 1.10 1.13 1972 126.5 291.8 148.2 143.6 91.7 98.6 2.31 1.17 1.14 1.08 1.11 1973 159.3 364.9 184.4 180.5 111.5 120.2 2.29 1.16 1.13 1.08 1.11 1974 190.7 428.7 216.6 212.1 142.0 152.2 2.25 1.14 1.11 1.07 1.09 1975 219.4 490.2 247.4 242.9 167.0 176.9 2.23 1.13 1.11 1.06 1.09 1976 272.7 601.1 303.0 298.1 197.2 207.2 2.20 1.11 1.09 1.05 1.08
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254432A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254432A1.txt
  • subscriber per month in the second quarter of 2004 was $55.59 and $65.00 for EchoStar and DirecTV, respectively. See EchoStar Communications Corporation IO-Q, (filed Aug. 9, 2004) at 23 and The DirecTV Group, Znc. IO-Q, (filed Aug. 10, 2004) at 41. 39 THE REPORT 97 < > GENERAL APPENDICES THE REPORT 98 i > APPENDIX A: Letters From Congress ky-18-01 01.13~11 From- JOE BARTON, TEXAS CWAl RMAN May 18,2004 RECEIVED In the context of our recent examination of setellite television reauthorization legislation, the Comminec on Energy and Conmace has been engagad in discussions concerning the eficacy of providing a la carte and hcmcd-tier smccs to cable and satellite subscribers. As the manbas of the Committee have ~scusscd these issues, some have
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257247A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257247A1.pdf
  • See Kristen Fountain, Antennas Sprout, and a Neighborhood Goes Online, The New York Times, June 10, 2004. See id. See id. See id. See id. See Jacksonville Chamber of Commerce, JaxWIz receives $100,000, Access Jacksonville, September 2004, at 10. See id. See id. See id. See Nortel Networks, BellSouth Announces Fixed Wireless Broadband Trial in Daytona Florida, January 13, 2003, . See id. >. South Dakota Interoperability, presentation by Otto Doll, Commissioner, South Dakota Public Utilities Commission, at the South Dakota PUC Wireless Conference, Sept. 28, 2004. >. Dan Meyer, Nextel to End Flarion Trial, Deemed Successful, RCR Wireless News, Feb. 8, 2005. See Sprint Joins the WiMax Forum, News Release, Sprint, Jan. 31, 2005; Brad Smith, The Sprint-Nextel Merger Raises
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.txt
  • 1.61 1967 39.7 114.2 54.6 59.6 23.4 31.8 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46.4 126.9 61.5 65.4 28.2 40.0 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 64.6 172.0 82.7 89.4 38.3 51.6 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81.1 196.6 98.9 97.7 51.0 59.8 2.43 1.22 1.21 1.17 1.19 1971 100.9 237.4 120.7 116.6 68.4 75.1 2.35 1.20 1.16 1.10 1.13 1972 126.5 291.8 148.2 143.6 91.7 98.6 2.31 1.17 1.14 1.08 1.11 1973 159.3 364.9 184.4 180.5 111.5 120.2 2.29 1.16 1.13 1.08 1.11 1974 190.7 428.7 216.6 212.1 142.0 152.2 2.25 1.14 1.11 1.07 1.09 1975 219.4 490.2 247.4 242.9 167.0 176.9 2.23 1.13 1.11 1.06 1.09 1976 272.7 601.1 303.0 298.1 197.2 207.2 2.20 1.11 1.09 1.05 1.08
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • Systems .................................................................................................. Table 10.1 5 Index of Tables and Charts Taxes ................................................................................................................ Table 11.11 Telecommunications Industry Revenues by Service ............................................. Table 1.2 Telecommunications Industry Revenues - Total ...................................................Table 1.1 Telecommunications Revenues by Type of Carrier ..............................................Table 1.3 Telecommunications Revenues - Interstate ........................................................ Table 1.16 Telecommunications Revenues - Intrastate ........................................................ Table 1.15 Telecommunications Revenues - Total - by State ................................................. Table 1.13 Telecommunications Revenues - 2002................................... ................... Table 1.14 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs ...........................Table 8.3 Transmission Systems ............................................................................................. Table 10.2 Universal Service Program Requirements and Contribution Factors ..................... Table 1.10 Universal Service Support - Distribution of Universal Service Payments ............ Chart 1.1 Universal Service Support Mechanisms ................................................... Table 1.11 Universal Service Support Mechanisms - by State .......................................
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A13.txt
  • 1.64 Sprint - Florida FL 77,839 58,883 24,018 0.31 ALLTEL Georgia Communications GA 10,288 7,547 4,248 0.41 BellSouth - Georgia GA (243,885) (263,325) 173,050 (0.71) Verizon - Hawaii HI 6,299 4,436 108,883 17.29 Verizon - NW - Idaho ID 4,296 3,459 7,667 1.78 Qwest - Idaho South ID (43,892) (45,512) 6,782 (0.15) Qwest - Idaho North ID 1,472 1,534 1,669 1.13 Verizon - North - Contel Illinois IL 2,265 1,724 10,637 4.70 Verizon - South - Illinois IL 20,140 14,951 2,265 0.11 Verizon - North - Illinois IL 6,310 4,679 79,788 12.64 SBC - Ameritech - Illinois Bell IL (566,083) (578,029) 210,540 (0.37) Verizon - North - Contel/Indiana IN 2,504 1,863 8,349 3.33 Verizon - North - Indiana IN 10,766 7,727
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A2.txt
  • Systems .................................................................................................. Table 10.1 5 Index of Tables and Charts Taxes ................................................................................................................ Table 11.11 Telecommunications Industry Revenues by Service ............................................. Table 1.2 Telecommunications Industry Revenues - Total ...................................................Table 1.1 Telecommunications Revenues by Type of Carrier ..............................................Table 1.3 Telecommunications Revenues - Interstate ........................................................ Table 1.16 Telecommunications Revenues - Intrastate ........................................................ Table 1.15 Telecommunications Revenues - Total - by State ................................................. Table 1.13 Telecommunications Revenues - 2002................................... ................... Table 1.14 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs ...........................Table 8.3 Transmission Systems ............................................................................................. Table 10.2 Universal Service Program Requirements and Contribution Factors ..................... Table 1.10 Universal Service Support - Distribution of Universal Service Payments ............ Chart 1.1 Universal Service Support Mechanisms ................................................... Table 1.11 Universal Service Support Mechanisms - by State .......................................
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A3.txt
  • 99-200, 95-116, 98-170, Report and Order and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 17 FCC Rcd 24952 (2002). 16 Figures in Table 1.11 are lower than those in Table 1.10 due to the difference between projected demand and actual disbursements. 17 For a discussion of the methodology used to estimate contributions per state, see the Technical Appendix below and Table 1.13. 1 -8 Technical Appendix Carrier revenue information is not reported on a state-by-state basis. Therefore, it is necessary to estimate revenues per state in order to derive contributions made per state. The nationwide sum of contributions to support universal service is equal to the payments made from USAC to carriers for universal service mechanisms plus administration costs. Contributions on a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • 0.64 Georgia 0.71 0.01 0.00 0.16 0.46 0.27 0.26 1.87 Guam 3.41 0.00 0.00 0.65 1.10 0.00 0.00 5.16 Hawaii 0.51 (0.00) 0.00 0.01 0.47 0.24 0.13 1.36 Idaho 2.40 0.01 0.00 0.21 0.74 1.80 0.90 6.06 Illinois 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.55 Indiana 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.22 0.56 0.19 1.23 Iowa 0.72 0.05 0.00 0.23 1.13 0.28 1.05 3.47 Kansas 3.26 0.03 0.00 0.29 1.42 0.38 0.67 6.06 Kentucky 0.69 0.01 0.62 0.10 0.47 0.64 0.18 2.70 Louisiana 1.92 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.58 0.34 0.22 3.39 Maine 0.76 0.00 0.18 0.28 0.69 0.03 0.70 2.64 Maryland 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.06 Massachusetts 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.04 Michigan 0.31 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.txt
  • 44.82 47.51 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 85 85 85 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-Minute Business-Day Same-Zone Call $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 Basic Connection Charge $71.05$71.36$72.75$72.55$71.41$69.88$67.87$68.47$68.67$65.83$67.87$67.77$67.04$67.29$67.23$67.24 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service**** 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 **** **** **** Taxes 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 4.53 4.40 4.69 5.09 6.95 6.93 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85 73.29 70.09 72.55 72.29 71.86 72.39 74.18 74.17 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed $5.92 $7.87
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • Table 1.10 Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Single Line (As of October 15, 2005) Table 1.11 Monthly Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Single Line (As of October 15), 1994-2005 Table 1.12 Connection Charges for a Single Business Line in the Sample Cities (As of October 15), 1994-2005 Table 1.13 Standard Deviation Analysis of Residential Rates in the Sample Cities (As of October 15, 2005) Table 1.14 Historical Standard Deviation Analysis of Residential Rates in the Sample Cities (As of October 15) ii Table 1.15 Average Revenue per Minute for Interstate Toll Service Calls II. Expenditures on Telephone Service......................................................II-1 A. Residential Expenditures..................................................................II-2 B. Business Expenditures.....................................................................II-2 C. Additional Sources of Information
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • Downtime Causes ....................................................................................... Table 9.3 Switching Systems .................................................................................................. Table 10.1 Taxes ................................................................................................................ Table 11.11 Telecommunications Industry Revenues by Service ............................................. Table 1.2 Telecommunications Industry Revenues - Total ...................................................Table 1.1 Telecommunications Revenues by Type of Carrier ..............................................Table 1.3 Telecommunications Revenues - Interstate ........................................................ Table 1.16 Telecommunications Revenues - Intrastate ........................................................ Table 1.15 Telecommunications Revenues - Total - by State ................................................. Table 1.13 Telecommunications Revenues - 2002................................... ................... Table 1.14 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs ...........................Table 8.3 Transmission Systems ............................................................................................. Table 10.2 Universal Service Program Requirements and Contribution Factors ..................... Table 1.10 Universal Service Support - Distribution of Universal Service Payments ............ Chart 1.1 Universal Service Support Mechanisms ................................................... Table 1.11 Universal Service Support Mechanisms - by State .......................................
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A2.txt
  • Downtime Causes ....................................................................................... Table 9.3 Switching Systems .................................................................................................. Table 10.1 Taxes ................................................................................................................ Table 11.11 Telecommunications Industry Revenues by Service ............................................. Table 1.2 Telecommunications Industry Revenues - Total ...................................................Table 1.1 Telecommunications Revenues by Type of Carrier ..............................................Table 1.3 Telecommunications Revenues - Interstate ........................................................ Table 1.16 Telecommunications Revenues - Intrastate ........................................................ Table 1.15 Telecommunications Revenues - Total - by State ................................................. Table 1.13 Telecommunications Revenues - 2002................................... ................... Table 1.14 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs ...........................Table 8.3 Transmission Systems ............................................................................................. Table 10.2 Universal Service Program Requirements and Contribution Factors ..................... Table 1.10 Universal Service Support - Distribution of Universal Service Payments ............ Chart 1.1 Universal Service Support Mechanisms ................................................... Table 1.11 Universal Service Support Mechanisms - by State .......................................
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A3.txt
  • to support universal service is equal to the payments made from USAC to carriers for universal service mechanisms plus administration costs. Contributions on a per-state basis are computed by multiplying nationwide contributions by the ratio of interstate end-user revenues in each state to nationwide interstate end-user revenues. Estimates of interstate end-user revenues for 2004 by state are reported in Table 1.13. Each state's share of interstate end user revenues is reported in Table 1.12.20 The remainder of this appendix provides a detailed description on how revenues are allocated to the states. Tables 1.5 and 1.6 present nationwide data on telecommunications revenues derived from information filed on Form 499-A Telecommunications Reporting 18 Figures in Table 1.11 are lower than those in Table
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • -1.43 -6.56 5.49 -2.18 AMERICAN SAMOA -6.46 1.06 -7.44 -51.22 ARIZONA -3.62 -6.12 2.66 14.29 ARKANSAS -0.49 -3.05 2.64 -6.46 CALIFORNIA -1.16 -2.79 1.67 13.02 COLORADO -4.88 -3.70 -1.23 -7.81 CONNECTICUT -5.71 -4.25 -1.52 0.00 DELAWARE -0.28 -3.20 3.02 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.46 -4.93 -3.71 0.00 FLORIDA 3.72 -3.75 7.76 17.84 GEORGIA 3.74 -3.96 8.02 10.72 GUAM 0.81 -0.32 1.13 -10.06 HAWAII 7.02 -3.22 10.58 67.17 IDAHO -6.18 -1.58 -4.68 -7.69 ILLINOIS -2.19 -4.38 2.28 21.00 INDIANA -2.13 -3.54 1.46 30.43 IOWA -1.04 -4.22 3.32 25.76 KANSAS -2.87 -7.00 4.45 4.98 KENTUCKY -1.87 -3.96 2.17 -3.57 LOUISIANA -0.01 -5.02 5.27 -2.15 MAINE 1.10 -4.82 6.22 15.59 MARYLAND -0.77 -3.61 2.94 52.89 MASSACHUSETTS -1.46 -5.16 3.90 -59.52 MICHIGAN -2.05 -4.60 2.68
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 85 85 85 86 85 86 86 Cost of a Five-Minute Business-Day Same-Zone Call $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 $0.10 Basic Connection Charge $71.05$71.36$72.75$72.55$71.41$69.88$67.87$68.47$68.67$65.83$67.87$67.77$67.04$67.29$67.23$67.24$67.35 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service**** 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 **** **** **** **** Taxes 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 4.53 4.40 4.69 5.09 6.95 6.42 6.35 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85 73.29 70.09 72.55 72.29 71.86 72.39 74.18 74.18 73.70 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • 349 647 Qwest 0.00 0.00 0.68 0.16 1.72 14,059 26,119 40,322 SBC 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.21 1.34 50,453 51,797 109,030 Sprint 0.00 0.00 0.73 0.15 1.81 5,197 20,146 22,856 Valor 0.00 0.00 0.78 0.35 2.33 278 902 1,180 Verizon 0.02 0.00 0.49 0.22 1.46 32,581 88,440 121,861 Price Caps 0.01 0.00 0.51 0.23 1.51 126,682 264,709 367,313 NECA 0.00 0.00 1.13 0.72 3.78 * * 19,340 All Price Caps and NECA 0.01 0.00 0.54 0.25 1.63 * * 386,654 * NECA no longer files information regarding originating and terminating Carrier Common Line (CCL) charges. 5 Data reflect only those company study areas subject to price-cap regulation. Source: Access tariff filings. Carrier Common Line 2 Effective 07/01/03, the carrier common line (CCL)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277103A6.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277103A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277103A6.txt
  • Assertion D.1: Form 507, 508, 509 Submission Non-Compliance: Causes* Observed Sample Occurrences Size X N D.1.1 - Imprecise FCC Rule/s 2 14 D.1.7 - Inadequate Documentation Retention 3 14 D.1.8 - Inadequate Auditee Processes and/or Polices and Procedures 2 14 D.1..9 - Inadequate Systems for Collecting, Reporting, and/or Monitoring Data 2 14 D.1.12 - Applicant/Auditee Weak Internal Controls 3 14 D.1.13 - Applicant/Auditee Data Entry Error 1 14 D.1.16 - Service Provider Error (other) 3 14 Other 1 1 Assertion D.2: Common Line Annual Certification Non-Compliance: Causes* Observed Sample Occurrences Size X N D.2.12 - Applicant/Auditee Weak Internal Controls 1 1 Other 1 1 Assertion E.1 Calculation of Safety Net Additive Non-Compliance: Causes* Observed Sample Occurrences Size X N Other 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • Downtime Causes ....................................................................................... Table 9.3 Switching Systems .................................................................................................. Table 10.1 Taxes ................................................................................................................ Table 11.11 Telecommunications Industry Revenues by Service ............................................. Table 1.2 Telecommunications Industry Revenues - Total ...................................................Table 1.1 Telecommunications Revenues by Type of Carrier ..............................................Table 1.3 Telecommunications Revenues - Interstate ........................................................ Table 1.16 Telecommunications Revenues - Intrastate ........................................................ Table 1.15 Telecommunications Revenues - Total - by State ................................................. Table 1.13 Telecommunications Revenues - 2002................................... ................... Table 1.14 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs ...........................Table 8.3 Transmission Systems ............................................................................................. Table 10.2 Universal Service Program Requirements and Contribution Factors ..................... Table 1.10 Universal Service Support - Distribution of Universal Service Payments ............ Chart 1.1 Universal Service Support Mechanisms ................................................... Table 1.11 Universal Service Support Mechanisms - by State .......................................
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A2.txt
  • Downtime Causes ....................................................................................... Table 9.3 Switching Systems .................................................................................................. Table 10.1 Taxes ................................................................................................................ Table 11.11 Telecommunications Industry Revenues by Service ............................................. Table 1.2 Telecommunications Industry Revenues - Total ...................................................Table 1.1 Telecommunications Revenues by Type of Carrier ..............................................Table 1.3 Telecommunications Revenues - Interstate ........................................................ Table 1.16 Telecommunications Revenues - Intrastate ........................................................ Table 1.15 Telecommunications Revenues - Total - by State ................................................. Table 1.13 Telecommunications Revenues - 2002................................... ................... Table 1.14 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs ...........................Table 8.3 Transmission Systems ............................................................................................. Table 10.2 Universal Service Program Requirements and Contribution Factors ..................... Table 1.10 Universal Service Support - Distribution of Universal Service Payments ............ Chart 1.1 Universal Service Support Mechanisms ................................................... Table 1.11 Universal Service Support Mechanisms - by State .......................................
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A3.txt
  • were committed over several years but paid out in calendar year 2006. In Sections 4 and 5, figures for the Schools and Libraries program and the Rural Health Care program are reported based on fiscal year rather than calendar year. 22 For a discussion of the methodology used to estimate contributions per state, see the Technical Appendix below and Table 1.13. 1 -9 The nationwide sum of contributions to support universal service is equal to the payments made from USAC to recipients of funds from the universal service mechanisms plus administration costs. Contributions on a per-state basis are computed by multiplying nationwide contributions by the ratio of interstate end user revenues in each state to nationwide interstate end user revenues. Estimates
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • -0.72 0.80 -8.90 250305 C MON-CRE TEL. COOP. INC. 1.70 -5.37 7.47 4.36 250306 C FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF ALABAMA, LLC -6.00 -1.59 -4.49 -40.98 250307 C MOUNDVILLE TEL. CO. 0.93 -3.63 4.74 2.37 250308 C NEW HOPE TEL. COOP., INC.-AL 5.95 -2.39 8.54 13.16 250311 A OAKMAN TEL. CO., INC. 6.82 -2.18 9.20 30.49 250312 A OTELCO TELEPHONE LLC 13.47 -1.13 14.77 0.00 250314 C PEOPLES TEL. CO. 1.30 -0.98 2.30 -0.81 250315 C PINE BELT TEL. CO. 12.38 -1.61 14.22 23.57 250316 C RAGLAND TEL. CO. 2.59 -10.01 14.00 8.03 250317 C ROANOKE TEL. CO., INC. 12.60 -3.65 16.87 61.31 250318 C FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF THE SOUTH, LLC -9.77 -2.50 -7.46 -60.92 250322 A UNION SPRINGS TEL. CO. 2.47 -1.80
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.txt
  • Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 85 85 85 86 85 86 85 78 Cost of a Five-Minute Business-Day Same-Zone Call $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 $0.10 $0.09 Basic Connection Charge $71.05$71.36$72.75$72.55$71.41$69.88$67.87$68.47$68.67$65.83$67.87$67.77$67.04$67.29$67.23$67.24$67.35$65.84 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service**** 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 **** **** **** a4 a4 Taxes 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 4.53 4.40 4.69 5.09 6.95 6.42 6.15 6.41 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85 73.29 70.09 72.55 72.29 71.86 72.39 74.18 74.18 74.18 72.26 Additional Charge If Drop Line
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279991A1.pdf
  • Issues) IWG-1 ­ Terrestrial and Space Science Services 1.2, 1.3, 1.5, 1.14, 1.16, & 1.20 IWG-2 ­ Satellite Services including those related to High Altitude Platform Stations (HAPS) 1.6 (Resolution 415), 1.7, 1.8, 1.17, 1.18, 1.19, & 1.21 IWG-3 ­ International Mobile Telephone (IMT-2000) & 2.5 GHz 1.4 & 1.9 IWG-4 ­ Broadcasting and Amateur Services 1.6 (Resolution 414), 1.11, 1.13, 1.15, & 7.1 (Recommendation 952) IWG-5 ­ Regulatory Issues 1.1, 1.0, 1.12, 2, 3, 5, 6, & 7.1 Satellite Digital Audio Radio Service Subscribers 0.69 2.10 4.42 6.90 8.25 0.48 1.81 4.68 7.14 0.11 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 2nd Quarter 20032nd Quarter 20042nd Quarter 20052nd Quarter 20062nd Quarter 2007 XM Sirius 30 Means and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • S/W New Mexico #1164 11.6 9 28.2510 22.966 18.45 16.86 11.45 20.67 65 Valor Telecom of TX d/b/a Windstream Com S/W New Mexico #1193 5.54 9 17.7710 21.166 20.41 15.88 8.39 13.35 66 Valor Telecom of TX d/b/a Windstream Com S/W Oklahoma -1.34 9 19.3810 15.296 8.69 9.31 11.65 11.22 67 Valor Telecom of TX d/b/a Windstream Com S/W Texas -1.13 9 18.0810 13.476 15.21 10.66 5.70 5.24 Maximum Rate of Return 64.24% 71.95% 68.80% 59.89% 54.09% 53.67% 47.67% 43.42% 48.69% Minimum Rate of Return (1.59) (33.59) (9.44) (17.50) (5.17) 0.86 (11.23) (9.93) (25.83) Weighted Arithmetic Mean 23.48 20.44 20.44 18.06 17.69 19.62 18.04 18.50 15.60 Standard Deviation 9.13 9.00 9.00 8.63 5.69 5.80 5.17 5.96 3.96 1 For years 1991
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • Average Local Rates for Businesses with a Single Line in Urban Areas, 1989-2007 Table 1.10 Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Single Line Table 1.11 Monthly Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Single Line, 1994-2007 Table 1.12 Connection Charges for a Single Business Line in the Sample Cities, 1994-2007 Table 1.13 Standard Deviation Analysis of Residential Rates in the Sample Cities Table 1.14 Historical Standard Deviation Analysis of Residential Rates in the Sample Cities Table 1.15 Average Revenue per Minute for Interstate Toll Service Calls II. Expenditures on Telephone Service......................................................II-1 A. Residential Expenditures..................................................................II-2 B. Business Expenditures.....................................................................II-2 C. Additional Sources of Information on Expenditures for Telephone Service......II-2 Table 2.1 Average Annual Household
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • Downtime Causes ....................................................................................... Table 9.3 Switching Systems .................................................................................................. Table 10.1 Taxes ................................................................................................................ Table 11.11 Telecommunications Industry Revenues by Service ............................................. Table 1.2 Telecommunications Industry Revenues - Total ...................................................Table 1.1 Telecommunications Revenues by Type of Carrier ..............................................Table 1.3 Telecommunications Revenues - Interstate ........................................................ Table 1.16 Telecommunications Revenues - Intrastate ........................................................ Table 1.15 Telecommunications Revenues - Total - by State ................................................. Table 1.13 Telecommunications Revenues - 2002................................... ................... Table 1.14 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs ...........................Table 8.3 Transmission Systems ............................................................................................. Table 10.2 Universal Service Program Requirements and Contribution Factors ..................... Table 1.10 Universal Service Support - Distribution of Universal Service Payments ............ Chart 1.1 Universal Service Support Mechanisms ................................................... Table 1.11 Universal Service Support Mechanisms - by State .......................................
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A2.pdf
  • Downtime Causes ....................................................................................... Table 9.3 Switching Systems .................................................................................................. Table 10.1 Taxes ................................................................................................................ Table 11.11 Telecommunications Industry Revenues by Service ............................................. Table 1.2 Telecommunications Industry Revenues - Total ...................................................Table 1.1 Telecommunications Revenues by Type of Carrier ..............................................Table 1.3 Telecommunications Revenues - Interstate ........................................................ Table 1.16 Telecommunications Revenues - Intrastate ........................................................ Table 1.15 Telecommunications Revenues - Total - by State ................................................. Table 1.13 Telecommunications Revenues - 2002................................... ................... Table 1.14 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs ...........................Table 8.3 Transmission Systems ............................................................................................. Table 10.2 Universal Service Program Requirements and Contribution Factors ..................... Table 1.10 Universal Service Support - Distribution of Universal Service Payments ............ Chart 1.1 Universal Service Support Mechanisms ................................................... Table 1.11 Universal Service Support Mechanisms - by State .......................................
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A3.pdf
  • committed over several years but paid out in the appropriate calendar year. In Sections 4 and 5, figures for the Schools and Libraries program and the Rural Health Care program are reported based on fiscal year rather than calendar year. 23 For a discussion of the methodology used to estimate contributions per state, see the Technical Appendix below and Table 1.13. 1 -9 Technical Appendix Carrier revenue information is not reported on a state-by-state basis. Therefore, it is necessary to estimate revenues per state in order to derive contributions made per state. The nationwide sum of contributions to support universal service is equal to the payments made from USAC to recipients of funds from the universal service mechanisms plus administration costs.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • 0.00 0.08 0.11 0.09 0.33 North Carolina 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.43 0.09 1.15 North Dakota 3.70 0.23 0.01 0.00 0.00 4.72 0.13 2.59 11.37 N. Mariana Islands (0.00) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.63 1.69 2.32 Ohio 0.14 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.18 0.07 0.65 Oklahoma 2.84 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.13 0.11 0.78 5.95 Oregon 1.13 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.89 0.80 0.39 3.23 Pennsylvania 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.25 0.07 0.64 Puerto Rico 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.31 0.00 0.00 3.31 Rhode Island 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 South Carolina 0.93 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.33 0.45 0.21 2.98 South Dakota 5.38 0.33 0.02 0.33 0.00 4.46 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.pdf
  • 85 78 78 Cost of a Five-Minute, Business-Day, Same-Zone Call $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 $0.10 $0.09 $0.11 Basic Connection Charge $71.05 $71.36 $72.75 $72.55 $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 $67.87 $67.77 $67.04 $67.29 $67.23 $67.24 $67.35 $62.55 $62.67 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 4 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 a4 a4 a4 a4 a4 a4 Tax, Including 911 Charges 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 4.53 4.40 4.69 5.09 6.95 6.42 6.15 6.41 6.06 Total Connection Charge $76.81 $77.40 $78.20 $78.07 $76.83 $74.93 $72.31 $72.85 $73.29 $70.09 $72.55 $72.29 $71.86 $72.39 $74.18 $73.66 $73.50 $68.96
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • and Trunk Blocking ................................................................... Table 9.2 Switch Downtime Causes ....................................................................................... Table 9.3 Telecommunications Industry Revenues by Service ............................................. Table 1.2 Telecommunications Industry Revenues - Total ................................................... Table 1.1 Telecommunications Revenues by Type of Carrier .............................................. Table 1.3 Telecommunications Revenues - Interstate ........................................................ Table 1.16 Telecommunications Revenues - Intrastate ........................................................ Table 1.15 Telecommunications Revenues - Total - by State ................................................. Table 1.13 Telecommunications Revenues - 2007................................... ................... Table 1.14 Universal Service Program Requirements and Contribution Factors ..................... Table 1.10 5 Index of Tables and Charts Universal Service Support - Distribution of Universal Service Payments ............ Chart 1.1 Universal Service Support Mechanisms ................................................... Table 1.11 Universal Service Support Mechanisms - by State ....................................... Table 1.12 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement - by State
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A2.txt
  • and Trunk Blocking ................................................................... Table 9.2 Switch Downtime Causes ....................................................................................... Table 9.3 Telecommunications Industry Revenues by Service ............................................. Table 1.2 Telecommunications Industry Revenues - Total ................................................... Table 1.1 Telecommunications Revenues by Type of Carrier .............................................. Table 1.3 Telecommunications Revenues - Interstate ........................................................ Table 1.16 Telecommunications Revenues - Intrastate ........................................................ Table 1.15 Telecommunications Revenues - Total - by State ................................................. Table 1.13 Telecommunications Revenues - 2007................................... ................... Table 1.14 Universal Service Program Requirements and Contribution Factors ..................... Table 1.10 5 Index of Tables and Charts Universal Service Support - Distribution of Universal Service Payments ............ Chart 1.1 Universal Service Support Mechanisms ................................................... Table 1.11 Universal Service Support Mechanisms - by State ....................................... Table 1.12 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement - by State
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.txt
  • committed over several years but paid out in the appropriate calendar year. In Sections 4 and 5, figures for the Schools and Libraries program and the Rural Health Care program are reported based on fiscal year rather than calendar year. 24 For a discussion of the methodology used to estimate contributions per state, see the Technical Appendix below and Table 1.13. 1 -9 Technical Appendix Carrier revenue information is not reported on a state-by-state basis. Therefore, it is necessary to estimate revenues per state in order to derive contributions made per state. The nationwide sum of contributions to support universal service is equal to the payments made from USAC to recipients of funds from the universal service mechanisms plus administration costs.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • 0.00 0.09 0.10 0.09 0.33 North Carolina 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.41 0.07 1.21 North Dakota 4.00 0.70 0.01 0.00 0.00 5.31 0.11 2.06 12.18 N. Mariana Islands 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.34 0.66 1.00 Ohio 0.12 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.17 0.06 0.60 Oklahoma 2.93 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.29 0.08 0.71 6.28 Oregon 1.13 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.97 0.70 0.38 3.19 Pennsylvania 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.25 0.05 0.67 Puerto Rico 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.33 0.00 0.00 5.33 Rhode Island 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 South Carolina 1.27 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.89 0.42 0.23 3.86 South Dakota 5.83 0.31 0.01 0.33 0.00 4.84 0.02
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.txt
  • 17.306 17.585 14.264 13.07 62 Iowa Telecom Systems Service Group 17.19 15.20 19.1410 20.16 23.975 20.474 18.45 63 Micronesian Telecommunications Corp. 51.51 51.05 45.48 43.52 43.526733.91 32.75 21.83 23.58 Windstream 64 Georgia Properties 25.88 65 Oklahoma Properties 41.37 66 Texas Windstream, Inc 19.51 67 Valor Oklahoma 17.69 30.33 (1.34)9 19.3810 15.296 8.69 9.31 11.65 11.22 68 Valor Texas 28.12 24.03 (1.13)9 18.0810 13.476 15.21 10.66 5.70 5.24 60 Valor New Mexico #1 30.73 22.84 11.609 28.2510 22.966 18.45 16.86 11.45 20.67 70 Valor New Mexico #2 25.72 21.64 5.549 17.7710 21.166 20.41 15.88 8.39 13.35 71 Windstream Alabama, LLC 31.19 72 Windstream Arkansas, LLC 24.61 73 Windstream Concord, Inc 39.50 74 Windstream Florida, Inc 29.08 75 Windstream Kentucky East, LLC Lexington
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
  • - 2009 ......................................................... Table 9.2 Switch Downtime Causes - 2009 ............................................................................ Table 9.3 Telecommunications Industry Revenues - Total ...................................................Table 1.1 Telecommunications Industry Revenues by Service ............................................. Table 1.2 Telecommunications Revenues - by Type of Carrier ............................................Table 1.3 Telecommunications Revenues - End User - by Provider - 2008..................... . Table 1.14 Telecommunications Revenues - End User - by State ........................................... Table 1.13 Telecommunications Revenues - Interstate and International - by Provider - 2008 Table 1.16 Telecommunications Revenues - Intrastate - by Provider - 2008 ....................... Table 1.15 Universal Service Program Requirements and Contribution Factors - 2010 ............Table 1.10 Universal Service Support - Distribution of Universal Service Payments - 2009 ... Chart 1.1 Universal Service Support Mechanisms - 2008 and 2009 ........................... Table
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A2.txt
  • - 2009 ......................................................... Table 9.2 Switch Downtime Causes - 2009 ............................................................................ Table 9.3 Telecommunications Industry Revenues - Total ...................................................Table 1.1 Telecommunications Industry Revenues by Service ............................................. Table 1.2 Telecommunications Revenues - by Type of Carrier ............................................Table 1.3 Telecommunications Revenues - End User - by Provider - 2008..................... . Table 1.14 Telecommunications Revenues - End User - by State ........................................... Table 1.13 Telecommunications Revenues - Interstate and International - by Provider - 2008 Table 1.16 Telecommunications Revenues - Intrastate - by Provider - 2008 ....................... Table 1.15 Universal Service Program Requirements and Contribution Factors - 2010 ............Table 1.10 Universal Service Support - Distribution of Universal Service Payments - 2009 ... Chart 1.1 Universal Service Support Mechanisms - 2008 and 2009 ........................... Table
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A3.txt
  • support universal service is equal to the payments made from USAC to recipients of funds from the universal service mechanisms plus administration costs. Contributions on a per-state basis are computed by multiplying nationwide contributions by the ratio of interstate end-user revenues in each state to nationwide interstate end-user revenues. Estimates of interstate end-user revenues by state are reported in Table 1.13. These estimates of end- user interstate revenues are used as a basis for estimating contributions in Table 1.12.24 The remainder of this appendix provides a detailed description on how revenues are allocated to the states. Table 1.6 presents nationwide data on end-user telecommunications revenues derived from information filed on Form 499-A Telecommunications Reporting Worksheets. Nationwide end- user telecommunications revenues from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.txt
  • 1.97 0.23 0.23 6.59 IDAHO 2.41 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.64 1.68 0.73 6.49 ILLINOIS 0.26 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.16 0.14 1.00 INDIANA 0.52 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.42 0.19 1.80 IOWA 1.25 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.95 0.57 0.88 4.81 KANSAS 5.91 0.10 0.21 0.00 0.00 3.20 0.32 0.70 10.45 KENTUCKY 1.22 0.08 0.00 0.59 0.00 1.13 0.68 0.19 3.88 LOUISIANA 2.54 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.20 0.38 0.17 4.34 MAINE 0.42 0.03 0.00 0.18 0.00 1.22 0.00 0.60 2.46 MARYLAND 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.06 0.01 0.11 MASSACHUSETTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.04 0.02 0.07 MICHIGAN 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.01 0.18 1.09 MINNESOTA 1.26 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.84
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.txt
  • 1.9 Carrier Telecommunications Revenues Reported on FCC Form 499-Q: 2009-2011 Table 1.10 Report Table 1.10 Universal Service Program Requirements and Contribution Factors for 2010-2011 Table 1.11 Report Table 1.11 Universal Service Support Mechanisms: 2009 & 2010 Chart 1.1 Report Chart 1.1 Distribution of Universal Service Payments: 2010 Table 1.12 Report Table 1.12 Universal Service Support Mechanisms by State: 2010 Tables 1.13 - 1.18Website Table 2.1 Report Table 2.1 Lifeline Subscribers and Link Up Beneficiaries Table 2.2 Report Table 2.2 Low-Income Support Payments Chart 2.1 Deleted Table 2.3 Report Table 2.3 Average Lifeline Monthly Support by ILEC Status and by State (December 2010) Table 2.4 Report Table 2.6 Low-Income Support Payments by State: 2010 (Years 1998 - 2010 are on the website)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.txt
  • Attach. A. The September to November missed appointment rate, PR 4-04, is 8.13 percent for Verizon and 7.09 percent for [competing carriers]. The December rate was 6.96 for Verizon and 10.31 for competing LECs. See PR 4-04 (Provisioning, POTS, percent Missed Appointments, Verizon, Dispatch, Loop - New). The percentage of installation troubles reported on voice grade loops for competitors were 1.13 percent in September, .98 percent in October, .80 percent in November and .74 in December. The comparable numbers for Verizon were 2.39 in September, 1.87 in October, 1.77 in November and 1.60 in December. See PR 6-02 (Provisioning, POTS, percent Installation Troubles reported within 7 Days - Loop). Results for the mean time to repair measure, Mean Time to Repair
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.txt
  • MR-4-07 % Out of Service > 12 Hours 24.46 67.54 65.89 69.38 63.46 65.91 62.29 61.48 MR-4-08 % Out of Service > 24 Hours 26.70 28.47 27.80 26.15 25.39 24.26 24.66 25.28 4n MR-5-01 % Repeat Reports within 30 Days 20.77 35.21 20.39 36.53 20.60 37.23 20.78 37.36 UNE Platform MR-2-02 Network Trouble Report Rate - Platform 1.45 1.26 1.24 1.13 1.50 1.34 1.45 1.34 MR-2-03 Network Trouble Report Rate - Central Office 0.21 0.15 0.21 0.13 0.20 0.16 0.19 0.14 MR-3-01 % Missed Repair Appointment - Bus. 13.10 8.05 13.36 10.59 13.46 9.47 12.92 8.86 MR-3-01 % Missed Repair Appointment - Res. 9.21 8.05 8.85 6.69 8.00 5.95 8.82 6.24 MR-3-02 % Missed Repair Appointment - Central Office Bus. 7.52
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-369A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-369A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-369A1.txt
  • (iv) acquisition of location-related information concerning a service subscriber; (v) preservation of any of the above information pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2703(f); and (vi) access to, or acquisition or interception of, communications or information as described in (i) through (v) above and comparable State laws. 1.12 "Foreign" where used in this Agreement, whether capitalized or lower case, means non-U.S. 1.13 "Governmental Authority" or "Governmental Authorities" mean any government, any governmental, administrative, or regulatory entity, authority, commission, board, agency, instrumentality, bureau or political subdivision and any court, tribunal, judicial or arbitral body. 1.14 "Intercept" or "Intercepted" has the meaning defined in 18 U.S.C. §2510(4). 1.15 "Lawful U.S. Process" means U.S. federal, state or local Electronic Surveillance orders or authorizations, and other
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.txt
  • Rejected Service Requests - Mechanized A.1.2 O-7 % Rejected Service Requests - Partially Mechanized A.1.3 O-7 % Rejected Service Requests - Non-Mechanized A.1.4 O-8 Reject Interval - Mechanized A.1.7 O-8 Reject Interval - Partially Mechanized - 10 hours A.1.8 O-8 Reject Interval - Non-Mechanized A.1.9 O-9 FOC Timeliness - Mechanized A.1.12 O-9 FOC Timeliness - Partially Mechanized - 10 hours A.1.13 O-9 FOC Timeliness - Non-Mechanized A.1.14 O-11 FOC & Reject Response Completeness - Mechanized A.1.15 O-11 FOC & Reject Response Completeness - Partially Mechanized A.1.16 O-11 FOC & Reject Response Completeness - Non-Mechanized Provisioning A.2.1 P-4 Order Completion Interval A.2.2 P-1 Held Orders A.2.4 P-2 % Jeopardies - Mechanized A.2.5 P-2 % Jeopardies - Non-Mechanized A.2.7 P-2 Average Jeopardy Notice
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-284A1.txt
  • the GM distribution of HEC Holdings Class C common stock. See General Motors Corp., SEC Form 10-Q, for period ending June 30, 2002 (GM June 2002 10-Q) at 25. Following the redemption of the Hughes Tracking Stock, GM intends to amend and restate its Certificate of Incorporation to eliminate such class of stock. See Implementation Agreement §§ 1.4(b)(iv), 1.5(d), 1.8, 1.13. As a result of these transactions, GM will have only one class of common stock, GM $1 2/3 par value common stock. A majority of holders of the outstanding shares of GM $1-2/3 Common Stock and Hughes Tracking Stock must approve the recapitalization and split-off. See Implementation Agreement § 1.2. In addition, the parties would not agree to complete the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.txt
  • 0.34 0.19 0.42 0.47 0.42 0.23 0.91 0.35 0.86 19 - 1992801UNE lp 2 w Dig xDSL cap 0.81 0.00 0.76 0.00 0.87 0.00 0.76 0.00 0.73 2.00 19 - 1992910UNE lp 4 w Dig 1.544 mbps cap/HDSL 2.80 3.35 2.80 2.84 2.49 2.90 2.84 3.25 2.57 3.17 19 - 1993501UNE Ded Trnspt DS1 1.78 3.77 1.14 3.28 0.96 3.44 1.13 3.79 0.82 3.29 19 - 1993502UNE Ded Trnspt DS3 0.16 2.31 0.32 2.53 0.39 1.33 1.01 1.87 0.46 1.34 19 - 1993505UNE EELs Voice Grade 0.26 tbd 0.34 tbd 0.42 tbd 0.17 tbd 0.43 tbd 19 - 1993506UNE EELs DS1 1.81 tbd 2.18 tbd 2.35 tbd 2.19 tbd 2.14 tbd 19 - 1993600Plat Basic Port and Lp 0.51 0.48 0.53
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.txt
  • at 6355, para. 230; SWBT Texas Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 18366-67, paras. 22-27. 268 See Florida/Tennessee A.1.9.1 (FOC Timeliness ­ Mechanized ­ Residence); Florida/Tennessee A.1.9.2 (FOC Timeliness ­ Mechanized ­ Business); Florida/Tennessee A.1.9.3 (FOC Timeliness ­ Mechanized ­ Design Specials); Florida/Tennessee A.1.12.1 (FOC Timeliness ­ Partially Mechanized ­ Residence); Florida/Tennessee A.1.12.2 (FOC Timeliness ­ Partially Mechanized ­ Business); Florida/Tennessee A.1.13.1 (FOC Timeliness ­ Non - Mechanized ­ Residence); Florida/Tennessee A.1.13.2 (FOC Timeliness ­ Non - Mechanized ­ Business); Florida/Tennessee A.1.13.3 (FOC Timeliness ­ Non - Mechanized ­ Design Specials); Florida/Tennessee B.1.9.3 (FOC Timeliness ­ Mechanized Loop and Port Combinations); Florida/Tennessee B.1.9.14 (FOC Timeliness ­ Mechanized ­ Other Design); Florida/Tennessee B.1.9.15 (FOC Timeliness ­ Mechanized ­ Other Non - Design); Florida/Tennessee
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-136A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-136A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-136A1.txt
  • channels 39.7 33.9 46.9 37.1 38.9 Rate per satellite channel $0..845 $1.275 $0.714 $0.987 $0.624 † Standard errors for 2002 averages are also representative of those for the 2000 and 2001 averages. ATTACHMENT 5 Noncompetitive Group, by Strata Element Very Large Large Medium Small Very Small July 2002 BST $11.89 $11.38 $15.05 $20.20 $22.02 Standard error † 0.33 0.28 0.70 1.13 1.53 CPST $25.55 $25.48 $21.75 $15.59 $9.19 Standard error 0.43 0.46 0.78 1.41 2.07 Programming total $37.44 $36.86 $36.80 $35.79 $31.21 Standard error 0.37 0.43 0.28 0.62 1.15 Equipment $4.45 $4.34 $3.46 $2.46 $0.65 Standard error 0.12 0.12 0.15 0.29 0.26 Programming & equipment $41.89 $41.20 $40.26 $38.25 $31.86 Standard error 0.40 0.45 0.35 0.76 1.24 Channels 68.9 65.9 63.29
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A1.txt
  • See NTIA Nov. 12, 2002 Ex Parte Letter, Encl. 4. > (last visited, Jan. 8, 2003). Radio waves, electrical wires, lightning and other frequency emitters can create noise. Id. In a separate calculation, we do take into account the different values for the parameters associated for the different satellites. This parameter is discussed in more detail in App. C2, Section 1.13. The value used here is a worst case value. We use the term ``outdoor blockage'' to describe the radiofrequency attenuation that occurs when an obstacle interrupts the link-of-sight path between a transmitter and a satellite receiver. ``Outdoor blockage'' is distinct from ``structural attenuation.'' We use the term ``structural attenuation'' to mean the signal attenuation caused by transmitting to and from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A1_Erratum.doc
  • See NTIA Nov. 12, 2002 Ex Parte Letter, Encl. 4. > (last visited, Jan. 8, 2003). Radio waves, electrical wires, lightning and other frequency emitters can create noise. Id. In a separate calculation, we do take into account the different values for the parameters associated for the different satellites. This parameter is discussed in more detail in App. C2, Section 1.13. The value used here is a worst case value. We use the term ``outdoor blockage'' to describe the radiofrequency attenuation that occurs when an obstacle interrupts the link-of-sight path between a transmitter and a satellite receiver. ``Outdoor blockage'' is distinct from ``structural attenuation.'' We use the term ``structural attenuation'' to mean the signal attenuation caused by transmitting to and from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A4.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A4.txt
  • dB compression point occurs at a minimum front-end output level of 10 dBm. The saturation resulting in desensitization is attributed to the LNA. The worst-case front-end input level leading to desensitization is -50 dBm. Given these potential values for saturation, we feel that the use of -50 dBm for airborne terminals and -60 dBm for mass-produced terrestrial receivers is reasonable. 1.13 MSV MSS Frequency Reuse Factor MSV states that its next-generation satellite will have approximately 200 beams and will use a 7 cell frequency plan. This, it argues, yields a (200/7 = 28.6) 28 fold frequency reuse factor, allowing it to reuse each frequency 28 times within the satellite coverage area. Inmarsat provides a statistical analysis that, using a number of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A4_Erratum.doc
  • dB compression point occurs at a minimum front-end output level of 10 dBm. The saturation resulting in desensitization is attributed to the LNA. The worst-case front-end input level leading to desensitization is -50 dBm. Given these potential values for saturation, we feel that the use of -50 dBm for airborne terminals and -60 dBm for mass-produced terrestrial receivers is reasonable. 1.13 MSV MSS Frequency Reuse Factor MSV states that its next-generation satellite will have approximately 200 beams and will use a 7 cell frequency plan. This, it argues, yields a (200/7 = 28.6) 28 fold frequency reuse factor, allowing it to reuse each frequency 28 times within the satellite coverage area. Inmarsat provides a statistical analysis that, using a number of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-3A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-3A2.txt
  • trade secrets, copyrighted works, reference source code implementations, shared secret keys, Diffie- Hellman system parameters, encryption and decryption keys, software development tools, methodologies, processes, technologies or algorithms, test data sets and test cases and other implementations of technology that CableLabs shall deliver to Licensee to assist in incorporating the DFAST Technology into Licensed Components, Prototypes, or Unidirectional Digital Cable Products. 1.13 "Licensed Patents" means U.S. Patent 4,860,353, any application, division, continuation or continuation in part of the foregoing patent, any patent reissuing on or reissuing pursuant to a reexamination of the foregoing patent and all foreign equivalents that CableLabs owns or has the rights to license. 1.14 "Prototype" means a pre-production model of a Unidirectional Digital Cable Product that is not
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-13A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-13A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-13A1.txt
  • not alter the stated, substantive criteria for determining whether a proceeding should be terminated, nor did it change the manner in which it applied the previously announced standard. It simply corrected an error in the Termination Order, making the appendix consistent with its text. Moreover, the Commission has already determined that it is not acting pursuant to sections 1.108 and 1.13 where the Commission ``corrects clerical or administrative errors that underlie or occur in the process of taking an action.'' We find that the erroneous reference to CC Docket No. 94-157 in the appendix of the Termination Order is the type of unintentional, processing error to which sections 1.108 and 1.113 and the associated time limits do not apply. As the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-241A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-241A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-241A1.txt
  • IT IS ORDERED that the petition for forbearance of Core Communications IS DENIED in part and GRANTED in part, as set forth herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. 160, and section 1.103(a), that the Commission's forbearance decision SHALL BE EFFECTIVE on October 8, 2004. Pursuant to sections 1.4 and 1.13 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.4 and 1.13, the time for appeal shall run from the release date of this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary STATEMENT OF COMMISSIONER JONATHAN S. ADELSTEIN Re: Petition of Core Communications, Inc. for Forbearance Under 47 U.S.C. § 160(c) from Application of the ISP Remand Order, WC Docket No. 03-171, Order
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-254A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-254A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-254A1.txt
  • pursuant to section 160 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160(d), BellSouth's Petition for Forbearance IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. 160, and section 1.103(a), that the Commission's forbearance decision SHALL BE EFFECTIVE on October 22, 2004. Pursuant to sections 1.4 and 1.13 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.4 and 1.13, the time for appeal shall run from the release date of this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch STATEMENT OF CHAIRMAN MICHAEL K. POWELL Re: Petition for Forbearance of the Verizon Telephone Companies Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 160(c), SBC Communications Inc.'s Petition for Forbearance Under 47 U.S.C. § 160(c),
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-95A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-95A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-95A1.txt
  • for forbearance of SBC Communications Inc. IS DENIED as set forth herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and section 1.103(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.103(a), that the Commission's forbearance decision SHALL BE EFFECTIVE on May 5, 2005. Pursuant to sections 1.4 and 1.13 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.4 and 1.13, the time for appeal shall run from the release date of this order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch APPENDIX LIST OF COMMENTERS Comments in WC Docket No. 04-29 Comments Abbreviation Association for Local Telecommunications Services ALTS AT&T Corp. AT&T BellSouth Corporation BellSouth California Public Utilities Commission California Commission Cbeyond
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-145A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-145A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-145A1.txt
  • the petition for forbearance of Fones4All IS DENIED as set forth herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and section 1.103(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.103(a), that the Commission's forbearance decision SHALL BE EFFECTIVE on September 28, 2006. Pursuant to sections 1.4 and 1.13 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.4 and 1.13, the time for appeal shall run from the release date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, that the emergency petition for interim waiver of Fones4All IS DISMISSED AS MOOT as set forth herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-167A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-167A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-167A1.txt
  • if the DOJ or the FBI find that the terms of this Agreement are inadequate to address national security, law enforcement or public safety concerns presented by that acquisition and the necessary modifications to this Agreement cannot be reached pursuant to Section 8.6 below. Nothing in this definition shall exempt any Domestic Communications Company from its obligations under Section 5.3. 1.13. ``Domestic Communications Infrastructure'' means (a) transmission, switching, bridging and routing equipment (including software and upgrades) subject to control by and used by or on behalf of a Domestic Communications Company to provide, process, direct, control, supervise or manage Domestic Communications; (b) facilities and equipment used by or on behalf of a Domestic Communications Company that are physically located in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-177A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-177A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-177A1.txt
  • (Mar. 22, 2006). Our rules contemplate that notice of debarment will be provided within 90 days of receipt of information submitted by the respondent in response to a suspension notice. 47 C.F.R. § 54.521(e)(5). Premio filed its Petition on March 27, 2006; 90 days thereafter was June 27, 2006. We may waive our own rules pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.13 in the public interest. To allow the Commission to have a full opportunity to analyze this matter, we hereby waive the 90 day rule as it applies to Premio, Inc.'s responsive pleading, filed March 27, 2006. NextiraOne, LLC, Notice of Debarment and Order Denying Waiver Petition, FCC 06-126 (rel. Jan. 22, 2007). See Letter from W. Kenneth Ferree, Esq. and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-188A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-188A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-188A1.txt
  • the extent stated and subject to the conditions established herein, and otherwise IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHERED ORDERED that, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and section 1.103(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.103(a), the Commission's forbearance decision SHALL BE EFFECTIVE on December 28, 2006. Pursuant to sections 1.4 and 1.13 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.4 and 1.13, the time for appeal shall run from the release date of this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary APPENDIX List of Commenters Comments in WC Docket No. 05-281 Comments Abbreviation Alaska Telephone Association ATA Covad Communications Group, Inc. Covad COMPTEL CompTel General Communication, Inc. GCI Integra Telecom, Inc.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-6A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-6A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-6A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Amendment of Section 1.13 of the Commission's Rules ) ) ) ) ORDER Adopted: January 24, 2006 Released: January 26, 2006 By the Commission: 1. By this order, we amend 47 C.F.R. § 1.13(a)(2) to eliminate an inconsistency with the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure (Federal Rules) that arose as a result of the 2002 amendments to the Federal Rules. Section 1.13 of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-92A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-92A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-92A1.txt
  • C.F.R. § 54.521(e)(1); Second Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 9226, ¶ 69. 47 C.F.R. §§ 54.521(e)(3), 54.521(e)(4). 47 C.F.R. § 54.521(e)(5). Our rule states that notice of debarment will be provided within 90 days of receipt of information submitted by the respondent in response to a suspension notice. We may waive our own rule pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.13 in the public interest. To allow the Commission to have a full opportunity to analyze this matter, we hereby waive the 90 day rule, as it applies to Inter-Tel's responsive pleading, filed February 22, 2005. 47 C.F.R. § 54.521(g). Letter from Maureen F. Del Duca, Chief, Investigations and Hearings Division, Enforcement Bureau, to Oscar Alvarez, Connect2 Internet Network, Inc., DA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-129A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-129A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-129A1.txt
  • for forbearance of Core Communications, Inc. IS DENIED as set forth herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and section 1.103(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.103(a), that the Commission's forbearance decision SHALL BE EFFECTIVE on July 26, 2007. Pursuant to sections 1.4 and 1.13 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.4 and 1.13, the time for appeal shall run from the release date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 5(c)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 155(c)(5), and section 1.115(g) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.115(g), that the application for review of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-138A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-138A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-138A1.txt
  • coordination. After certification, the application was amended to resolve the international coordination issues and subsequently was granted in July 2005. The proposed DTV Table Appendix B specifies the facilities to which Mid-State certified. Mid-State requests that DTV Table Appendix B be changed to reflect the facilities specified in its July 2005 construction permit. The facilities requested by Mid-State would cause 1.13 percent interference to WINM, Angola, Indiana (analog channel 63, post-transition digital channel 12) and 0.44 percent interference to WBOY, Clarksburg, West Virginia (analog channel 12, post-transition digital channel 12). Neither of the affected stations filed comments opposing WMFD's proposed change to Appendix B. We will grant Mid-State's request and change DTV Table Appendix B accordingly. This change is reflected in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-13A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-13A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-13A1.txt
  • that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), 10, 201, 202, 203, 214, and 272, of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 160, 201, 202, 203, 214, and 272, and section 1.103(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.103(a), the Commission's forbearance decision SHALL BE EFFECTIVE on February 20, 2007. Pursuant to sections 1.4 and 1.13 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.4 and 1.13, the time for appeal shall run from the release date of this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary APPENDIX A COMMENTERS Commenter Abbreviation AT&T Inc. AT&T BellSouth Corporation BellSouth Level 3 Communications, LLC Level 3 COMPTEL COMPTEL New Jersey Division of the Ratepayer Advocate New Jersey Ratepayer Advocate
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-149A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-149A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-149A1.txt
  • Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 54.901(a), 54.903 and 69.3(e)(9) ARE WAIVED to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHERED ORDERED that, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and section 1.103(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.103(a), this Order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE on August 20, 2007. Pursuant to sections 1.4 and 1.13 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.4 and 1.13, the time for appeal shall run from the release date of this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary APPENDIX LIST OF COMMENTERS Comments in WC Docket No. 06-109 Comments Abbreviation ACS of Anchorage, Inc. ACS General Communication, Inc. GCI Time Warner Telecom, Inc., Cbeyond Communications, LLC, and One
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-159A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-159A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-159A1.txt
  • in the Memorandum Opinion and Order, effective on August 31, 2007. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and section 1.103(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.103(a), that the Memorandum Opinion and Order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE on August 31, 2007. Pursuant to sections 1.4 and 1.13 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.4, 1.13, the time for appeal from that Memorandum Opinion and Order shall run from its release date. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Commission's Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau, Reference Information Center, SHALL SEND a copy of this Order, including the Final Regulatory Flexibility Certification, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-160A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-160A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-160A1.txt
  • extent that it is granted in the Section 272 Sunset Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and section 1.103(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.103(a), that the Commission's forbearance decision SHALL BE EFFECTIVE on August 31, 2007. Pursuant to sections 1.4 and 1.13 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.4, 1.13, the time for appeal shall run from the release date of this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary APPENDIX Comments WC Docket No. 06-120 Commenters Commenter Abbreviation ACS of Anchorage, Inc. ACS COMPTEL COMPTEL General Communication, Inc. GCI McLeodUSA Telecommunications Services, Inc. McLeod Sprint Nextel Corporation Sprint Nextel The
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-180A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-180A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-180A1.txt
  • extent described herein and otherwise ARE DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and section 1.103(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.103(a), this Order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE with regard to AT&T and Legacy BellSouth on October 11, 2007. Pursuant to section 1.4 and 1.13 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.4, 1.13, the time for appeal of the Commission's actions with regard to these carriers shall run from the release date of this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary APPENDIX PETITIONS FOR FORBEARANCE WC Docket No. 06-125 Petition Abbreviation AT&T Inc. AT&T BellSouth Corporation Legacy BellSouth COMMENTERS WC Docket No. 06-125
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-184A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-184A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-184A1.txt
  • ORDERED that, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and section 1.103(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.103(a), this Order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE with regard to Embarq Local Operating Companies and the Frontier and Citizens Incumbent Local Exchange Telephone Carriers on October 24, 2007. Pursuant to section 1.4 and 1.13 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.4, 1.13, the time for appeal of the Commission's actions with regard to these carriers shall run from the release date of this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary APPENDIX PETITIONS FOR FORBEARANCE WC Docket No. 06-147 Petition Abbreviation Embarq Local Operating Companies Embarq The Frontier and Citizens Communications Incumbent Local
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-2A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-2A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-2A1.txt
  • certain services provided to United States military personnel, as set forth herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and section 1.103(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.103(a), that the Commission's forbearance decision SHALL BE EFFECTIVE on January 18, 2007. Pursuant to sections 1.4 and 1.13 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.4 and 1.13, the time for appeal shall run from the release date of this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary APPENDIX Call Home Act of 2006 PL 109-459 (S 2653) One Hundred Ninth Congress of the United States of America AT THE SECOND SESSION Begun and held at the City
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-43A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-43A1.txt
  • management or marketing functions. 1.12. "Domestic Companies" means TELPRI and all existing and post-Agreement subsidiaries, divisions, departments, branches and other components of TELPRI, or any other entity over which TELPRI has de facto or de jure control, that (i) provide Domestic Communications, or (ii) engage in provisioning, control, maintenance, management, security, selling, billing, or monitoring of Hosting Services, or data. 1.13. "Effective Date" means the date of the last signature affixed to this Agreement by the Parties. 1.14. "Electronic Communication" has the meaning given it in 18 U.S.C. § 2510(12). 1.15. "FBI" means the Federal Bureau of Investigation. 4 1.16. "Foreign Entity" means any Foreign Person; any entity established under the laws of a country other than the United States, or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-120A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-120A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-120A1.txt
  • to conditions, to the extent described herein, and otherwise IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and section 1.103(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.103(a), that the Commission's forbearance decision SHALL BE EFFECTIVE on April 24, 2008. Pursuant to sections 1.4 and 1.13 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.4, 1.13, the time for appeal SHALL RUN from the release date of this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch APPENDIX Comments to AT&T Petition & BellSouth Petition (WC Docket No. 07-21) Ad Hoc Telecommunications Users Committee (Ad Hoc) National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates (NASUCA) Nebraska Rural Independent Companies (Nebraska
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-168A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-168A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-168A1.txt
  • Qwest Communications Corporation IS GRANTED to the extent described herein and otherwise IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and section 1.103(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.103(a), this Order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE on July 22, 2008. Pursuant to section 1.4 and 1.13 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.4, 1.13, the time for appeal of the Commission's actions with regard to these carriers shall run from the release date of this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary APPENDIX Qwest Petition for Forbearance Filed June 13, 2006 WC Docket No. 06-125 Petition Abbreviation Qwest Corporation and Qwest Communications Corporation Qwest
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-197A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-197A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-197A1.txt
  • that the petition for forbearance of OrbitCom, Inc. IS DENIED as set forth herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and section 1.103(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.103(a), that this decision SHALL BE EFFECTIVE on August 27, 2008. Pursuant to sections 1.4 and 1.13 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.4, 1.13, the time for appeal SHALL RUN from the release date of this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary STATEMENT OF COMMISSIONER MICHAEL J. COPPS CONCURRING Re: Petition of OrbitCom, Inc. for Forbearance from the CLEC Access Charge Rules, WC Docket No. 08-162 The forbearance petition before the Commission does
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-203A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-203A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-203A1.txt
  • motion, subject to conditions, to the extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and section 1.103(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.103(a), that the Commission's Memorandum Opinion and Order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE on September 6, 2008. Pursuant to sections 1.4 and 1.13 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.4, 1.13, the time for appeal SHALL RUN from the release date of this Memorandum Opinion and Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1.103(a) and 1.427(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.103(a), 1.427(b), that this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking SHALL BE EFFECTIVE 30 days after publication of notice of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-262A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-262A1.txt
  • In re Core Communications, Inc. on Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the Federal Communications Commission, D.C. Cir. No. 07-1446 (decided July 8, 2008). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this FURTHER NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING shall become effective on the date of publication of the text of a summary thereof in the Federal Register, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.4, 1.13. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this ORDER ON REMAND AND REPORT AND ORDER SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Commission's Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau, Reference Information Center, SHALL SEND a copy of this ORDER ON REMAND AND REPORT AND ORDER AND FURTHER NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING, including the Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, to the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-271A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-271A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-271A1.txt
  • GRANTED, subject to conditions, to the extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and section 1.103(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.103(a), that the Commission's Memorandum Opinion and Order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE on December 12, 2008. Pursuant to sections 1.4 and 1.13 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.4, 1.13, the time for appeal SHALL RUN from the release date of this Memorandum Opinion and Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary JOINT DISSENTING STATEMENT OF COMMISSIONERS MICHAEL J. COPPS AND JONATHAN S. ADELSTEIN Re: Petition of Qwest Corporation for Forbearance from Enforcement of the Commission's ARMIS and 492A Reporting
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-3A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-3A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-3A1.txt
  • and Feature Group IP Southeast LLC IS DENIED as set forth herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and section 1.103(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.103(a), that the Commission's forbearance decision SHALL BE EFFECTIVE on January 21, 2009. Pursuant to sections 1.4 and 1.13 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.4, 1.13, the time for appeal shall run from the release date of this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary STATEMENT OF COMMISSIONER ROBERT M. McDOWELL RE: Feature Group IP Petition for Forbearance From Section 251(g) of the Communications Act and Sections 51.701(b)(1) and 69.5(b) of the Commission's Rules, WC Docket
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-129A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-129A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-129A1.txt
  • 2,702 $19,167 $45,251 $53,837 14.1 0.28 0.80 82.3 Michigan 8 145.3 58.6 18,158 7,323 $16,433 $31,109 $36,540 16.9 9.73 24. 04 84.3 Minnesota 9 145.1 56.0 16,120 6,219 $16,468 $34,147 $42,576 12.7 5.89 15 .31 85.3 New Mexico 10 136.4 51.0 13,637 5,104 $13,844 $26,102 $32,446 19.5 1.18 3.15 72.7 Utah 13 131.9 43.9 10,146 3,379 $14,248 $33,697 $45,477 13.1 1.13 3.29 7 9.2 Wisconsin 8 131.5 51.4 16,438 6,430 $16,492 $35,111 $44,244 13.0 10.32 2 6.65 94.0 North Dakota 27 128.2 50.2 4,749 1,861 $15,417 $30,125 $42,435 13.9 1.55 3.98 94.0 U.S. Virgin Islands 3 108.6 40.6 36,204 13,549 $14,647 $26,925 NA NA 315.37 831.58 1 7.2 Nebraska 33 108.5 43.4 3,289 1,316 $15,094 $29,650 $37,598 13.5 2.04 5.1 4
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-56A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-56A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-56A1.txt
  • Commission, to Marlene H. Dortch, FCC, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed March 5, 2010) (Wyoming 2010 Update). The nationwide urban benchmark is $36.52. See Wyoming 2010 Update at 2. We note that the nationwide urban benchmark published on page I-4 of the most recent 2008 Reference Book is in error. The correct most recent nationwide urban benchmark is on Table 1.13 of the 2008 Reference Book. See Wyoming 2004 Certification at 2-3. We note that the Wyoming Commission certified each year subsequent to the Wyoming 2004 Certification that residential rates in rural areas served by Qwest continue to exceed the urban rate benchmark. See e.g. Letter from Alan B. Miner et al, Wyoming Public Service Commission, to Marlene H. Dortch, Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-57A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-57A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-57A1.txt
  • of the Universal Service First Report and Order that all insular carriers should be treated as rural carriers - and thus receive support on the basis of embedded costs - even if (like PRTC) they are too large to meet the definition of a rural carrier. PRTC was then the twelfth largest telephone company in the nation, with more than 1.13 million access lines and annual operating revenues of $1 billion. Nevertheless, PRTC asserted that the extreme weather and terrain conditions and high shipping costs in insular areas made the cost characteristics of even large insular carriers more like those of rural carriers. The Commission rejected PRTC's request that it be treated as a rural carrier. The agency stressed that its
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.txt
  • with weighted density AS1 AS2 AS7 AS8 AS13 AS14 AS15 AS16 AS17 AS18 AS21 AS22 Loops 0.891*** 0.964*** 1.008*** 1.073*** 0.529*** 0.716*** 0.756*** 0.8 95*** 0.762*** 0.844*** 0.785*** 0.621* (17.29) (11.74) (8.03) (5.79) (5.65) (8.89) (5.67) (7.44) (9.37) (6.92) (11.08) (2.07) Weighted_Density -0.0393 -0.0231 -0.0146 0.0160 -0.0735 -0.0554 0.157* - 0.0518 -0.0103 -0.0102 0.0504 0.211 (-1.27) (-0.54) (-0.16) (0.13) (-1.24) (-1.13) (2.29) (-0.49) (-0.22) ( -0.18) (1.01) (1.33) Housing_Units_nu -0.35*** -0.42*** -0.392* -0.416 0.0653 -0.287** -0.007 9 -0.374* -0.155 -0.198 -0.101 0.0367 (-5.11) (-4.39) (-2.31) (-1.69) (0.61) (-2.84) (-0.05) (-2.14) (-1.50) (-1.40) (-1.09) (0.09) Housing_Units_uc 0.139* 0.172* 0.227 0.248 0.0441 0.0248 -0.0198 0.176 0 .121 0.117 0.220 0.235 (2.26) (2.12) (0.91) (0.73) (0.41) (0.25) (-0.15) (0.96) (1.19) (1.05) (1.73) (0.74) Housing_Units_ua
• http://publicsafety.fcc.gov/pshs/clearinghouse/index.htm?section=Continuity%20Plans
  • Plans are the specific preparations, plans, and guidelines for industry, tribal, local, state, and federal departments and agencies develop to provide for the survival of functional operations in the event of a disaster or catastrophic occurrence. * 8/12/2010 * [71]Colorado Department of Health and Environment * Feb. 2010. Preparedness and Prevention, Contingency Plan and Emergency Procedures, Large Quantity Generators. pdf (1.13MB) * 4/3/2008 * [72]Lincoln, NE ECC 911 System Failure Procedure * The 911 System Failure Procedure establishes guidelines for reporting of Emergency Communications Center/911 Telephone System failures. * 4/3/2008 * [73]Lincoln, NE ECC Evacuation Plan * The Evacuation Plan contains policies and procedures to be followed for any situation that puts the 911 Center out of service or in danger
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.txt
  • -33.3% 0.07 0.1% 16.7% 6 to 12 0.19 0.3% 0.09 0.1% -52.6% 0.08 0.1% -11.1% 5 or less 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.0% Not Avail. 1.22 - 1.20 - -1.6% 2.13 - 77.5% Total 62.43 - 64.44 - 3.2% 66.05 - 2.5% Sys. w/30+ channels 60.08 98.2% 62.48 98.8% 4.0% 63.03 98.6% 0.9% Sys. w/less than 30 1.13 1.8% 0.76 1.2% -32.7% 0.89 1.4% 17.1% Notes: Figures are as of October 1, 1997, October 1, 1998, and October 1, 1999. All "Percent of Subscribers" calculations exclude "not available" data, including the percentage tabulations in the categories of "Systems with 30+ channels" and "Systems with less than 30 channels." Sources: 1997: Warren Publishing, Inc., Channel Capacity of Existing Cable
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc98335.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc98335.txt
  • 0.1% -33.3% 6 to 12 0.19 0.3% 0.19 0.3% 0.0% 0.09 0.1% -52.6% 5 or less 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.0% Not Avail. 0.09 - 1.22 - 1255.6% 1.20 - -1.6% Total 60.83 - 62.43 - 2.6% 64.44 - 3.2% Sys. w/30+ channels 59.64 98.2% 60.08 98.2% 0.7% 62.5 98.8% 4.0% Sys. w/less than 30 1.10 1.8% 1.13 1.8% 2.7% 0.8 1.2% -32.7% Note: Figures are as of October 1, 1996, October 1, 1997, and October 30, 1998. Note: All "Percentage of Systems" calculation excludes "not available" data, (this includes the percentage tabulations in the categories of "Systems with 30+ channels" and "Systems with less than 30 channels.") Sources: ! !1996: Warren Publishing, Inc., Channel Capacity of Existing
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.txt
  • differences that we find for non-dispatch UNE-P orders (measured in days), are summarized in the Table below. Estimated Difference in Average Completed Intervals for Non-dispatch UNE-P Orders June July August BA CLEC Diff BA CLEC Diff BA CLEC Diff Carrier to carrier metrics data 1.25 3.20 -1.95* 0.99 2.55 -1.56* 1.07 1.91 -0.84* Using properly "W" coded CLEC orders 1.25 1.13 0.12 0.99 1.31 -0.32 1.07 2.36 -1.29 Adjustment to CLEC data for difference in standard intervals +0.53 +0.04 -0.62 CLEC data revised for alleged biases 1.25 1.68 -0.43* 0.99 1.35 -0.36* 1.07 1.74 -0.67* The top line in the table is the Average Completed Interval data reported in the Carrier to Carrier report for both Bell Atlantic retail orders and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Public_Notices/2001/da012436.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Public_Notices/2001/da012436.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Public_Notices/2001/da012436.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Public_Notices/2001/da012436.txt
  • messenger-delivered paper filings only at our Capitol Heights facility located at 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. To accommodate this change in location, the time deadline for filing at the Capitol Heights facility is extended hereafter to 9:00 PM Eastern Time. Filings received at the Capitol Heights facility will be date-stamped. Filings made pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.13(a) should also be made at the Capitol Heights facility where they will be date and time stamped. Subpoenas directed to the Commission or its employees in their official capacities will be received only at the Capitol Heights facility. The Commission is currently looking for an alternative site in Washington, D.C., to accept delivery of filings on a more permanent basis.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
  • > 24 Hours 25.77 NA 18.83 0 21.65 0 28.76 0 23.04 0 b,c,d,e MR-5 - Repeat Trouble Reports MR-5-01-3550 % Repeat Reports within 30 Days 15.94 NA 14.64 0 13.37 0 13.86 25 13.56 0 b,c,d,e Maintenance - POTS Platform MR-2 - Trouble Report Rate MR-2-02-3140 Network Trouble Report Rate ­ Platform 0.92 0.5 0.77 0.64 0.57 1.11 0.67 1.13 0.58 0.18 MR-2-03-3140 Network Trouble Report Rate ­ Central Office 0.14 0.17 0.06 0 0.04 0 0.05 0.19 0.06 0 MR-2-04-3140 % Subsequent Reports 11.59 20 10.31 0 11.71 0 22.22 0 a,b,c,e MR-2-05-3140 % CPE/TOK/FOK Trouble Report Rate 0.82 0.66 0.65 0.32 0.51 0.16 0.57 0.54 MR-3 - Missed Repair Appointments MR-3-01-3144 % Missed Repair Appointment ­ Platform Bus.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2008budget_complete.pdf
  • Issues) IWG-1 ­ Terrestrial and Space Science Services 1.2, 1.3, 1.5, 1.14, 1.16, & 1.20 IWG-2 ­ Satellite Services including those related to High Altitude Platform Stations (HAPS) 1.6 (Resolution 415), 1.7, 1.8, 1.17, 1.18, 1.19, & 1.21) IWG-3 ­ International Mobile Telephone (IMT-2000) & 2.5 GHz 1.4 & 1.9 IWG-4 ­ Broadcasting and Amateur Services 1.6 (Resolution 414), 1.11, 1.13, 1.15, & 7.1 (Recommendation 952) IWG-5 ­ Regulatory Issues 1.1, 1.0, 1.12, 2, 3, 5, 6, & 7.1) MEDIA At the end of FY 2006, a total of 1,586 of 1,687 licensed DTV stations (94%) were on the air with DTV operations. Of these, 1,041 are licensed digital facilities or facilities with program test authority and 545 are operating pursuant
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-256485A1.html
  • or money order may be mailed to Forfeiture Collection Section, Finance Branch, Federal Communications Commission, P.O. Box 73482, Chicago, Illinois 60673-7482. Payment by overnight mail may be sent to Bank One/LB 73482, 525 West Monroe, 8th Floor Mailroom, Chicago, IL 60661. Payment by wire transfer may be made to ABA Number 071000013, receiving bank Bank One, and account number 1165259. 1.13. The response, if any, must be mailed to Federal Communications Commission, Enforcement Bureau, Western Region, San Diego Office, 4542 Ruffner Street - Suite 370, San Diego, California 92111 and must include the NAL/Acct. No. referenced in the caption. 1.14. The Commission will not consider reducing or canceling a forfeiture in response to a claim of inability to pay unless the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-260117A1.html
  • the Commission's Rules.13 1.12. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT, pursuant to Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules, within thirty days of the release date of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, Farmworkers Educational Radio Network Inc., SHALL PAY the full amount of the proposed forfeiture or SHALL FILE a written statement seeking reduction or cancellation of the proposed forfeiture. 1.13. Payment of the forfeiture must be made by check or similar instrument, payable to the order of the Federal Communications Commission. The payment must include the NAL/Acct. No. and FRN No. referenced above. Payment by check or money order may be mailed to Federal Communications Commission, P.O. Box 358340, Pittsburgh, PA 15251-8340. Payment by overnight mail may be sent to
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-262295A1.html
  • of the violation, and with respect to the violator, the degree of culpability, and any history of prior offenses, ability to pay, and other such matters as justice may require.''16 Applying the Forfeiture Policy Statement, Section 1.80 and the statutory factors, we conclude that the Petersons are apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $8,000. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES 1.13. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Sections 0.111, 0.311 and 1.80 of the Commission's Rules, Richard A. & Joann R. Peterson, Joint Tenants, are hereby NOTIFIED of their APPARENT LIABILITY FOR A FORFEITURE in the amount of eight thousand dollars ($8,000) for violating Section 11.35 of the Commission's
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-263779A1.html
  • violation, and with respect to the violator, the degree of culpability, and any history of prior offenses, ability to pay, and other such matters as justice may require.''12 Applying the Forfeiture Policy Statement, Section 1.80 and the statutory factors, we conclude that the KPAL Television Inc., is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $8,000. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES 1.13. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Sections 0.111, 0.311 and 1.80 of the Commission's Rules, KPAL Television Inc., is hereby NOTIFIED of its APPARENT LIABILITY FOR A FORFEITURE in the amount of eight thousand dollars ($8,000) for violating Section 11.35(a) of the Commission's Rules.13 1.14. IT IS FURTHER
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/FCC-03-163A1.html
  • expiration of the three year term, AT&T could charge Ryder an early service termination fee in ``an amount equal to 100% of the unsatisfied MARC for each year remaining in the Custom Offer Agreement term.''12 Ryder further agreed with AT&T that the early service termination provision in the parties' contract would supercede the early service termination provision in Tariff No. 1.13 In addition, the parties agreed to incorporate the limitation of liability provisions in Tariff No. 1,14 under which AT&T remained liable for damages caused by any willful misconduct in its provision of tariffed services.15 5. AT&T filed the parties' contract with the Commission as Contract Tariff No. 6831 (``CT 6831'').16 CT 6831 became effective on April 15, 1997.17 6. In
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-92A1.html
  • C.F.R. S 54.521(e)(1); Second Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 9226, P 69. 47 C.F.R. SS 54.521(e)(3), 54.521(e)(4). 47 C.F.R. S 54.521(e)(5). Our rule states that notice of debarment will be provided within 90 days of receipt of information submitted by the respondent in response to a suspension notice. We may waive our own rule pursuant to 47 C.F.R. S 1.13 in the public interest. To allow the Commission to have a full opportunity to analyze this matter, we hereby waive the 90 day rule, as it applies to Inter-Tel's responsive pleading, filed February 22, 2005. 47 C.F.R. S 54.521(g). Letter from Maureen F. Del Duca, Chief, Investigations and Hearings Division, Enforcement Bureau, to Oscar Alvarez, Connect2 Internet Network, Inc., DA
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-06-177A1.html
  • (Mar. 22, 2006). Our rules contemplate that notice of debarment will be provided within 90 days of receipt of information submitted by the respondent in response to a suspension notice. 47 C.F.R. S 54.521(e)(5). Premio filed its Petition on March 27, 2006; 90 days thereafter was June 27, 2006. We may waive our own rules pursuant to 47 C.F.R. S 1.13 in the public interest. To allow the Commission to have a full opportunity to analyze this matter, we hereby waive the 90 day rule as it applies to Premio, Inc.'s responsive pleading, filed March 27, 2006. NextiraOne, LLC, Notice of Debarment and Order Denying Waiver Petition, FCC 06-126 (rel. Jan. 22, 2007). See Letter from W. Kenneth Ferree, Esq. and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-99-55A1.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-99-55A1.pdf
  • Stations seeking to take advantage of these new procedures would be required to file all applications on the same day and include in each application a copy of the agreement that references all related applications. Applications would be processed as a group and granted simultaneously. If any of the applications is unacceptable, the entire group of applications would be dismissed. 1.13 Overview of Comments. Most commenters strongly support increased flexibility for coordinated FM station facility improvements. Several commenters favor permitting groups of more than four related applications. Reynolds proposes that applicants be given a 30-day period to cure application defects, arguing that the "harsh" dismissal procedure proposed in the Notice could generate greenmail opportunities by subsequently-filed blocking applications. The Rutherford Group,
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.txt
  • be noted that, in the detailed calculation, the DBS receiving antenna pattern should include the effect of frequency at 12.2 GHz, 12.45 GHz, and 12.7 GHz. Similarly, the terrestrial antenna relative gain should also include the effect of frequency in both the azimuth and elevation gains. 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 2.25 1.69 1.13 0.56 0 Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-418 185 APPENDIX J: UNAVAILABILITY STATISTICS FOR INCREASES IN DBS OUTAGES OF 2.86%, 60 MINUTES, AND 30 MINUTES ANNUALLY (45 cm antenna) Unavailability Statistics for DIRECTV Satellite at 101o W.L for Top Markets (Statistics computed using inputs as listed in Appendix G and the method described in Appendix H) Average Yearly Statistics Increased Outage
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/rss/index.htm?job=ainf&id=65
  • 2006 19:40:00 GMT Summary Licenses: Auction No. 65 will offer nationwide commercial licenses in the 800 MHz band in the three alternative band configurations. Licenses in only one of these mutually incompatible band configurations will be awarded. Qualified Bidders: 9 Rounds Completed: 89 Bidding Days: 11 Results for Round 89 Gross Revenue: $34,597,000.00 - Dollar Change: 388000.00 - % Change: 1.13 Net Revenue: $33,777,500.00 - Dollar Change: -431500.00 - % Change: - 1.26 New Bids: 2 Withdrawn Bids: 0 Proactive Waivers: 0 Bidders that Reduced Eligibility: 0 Licenses with PWBs*: 2 FCC Held Licenses: 0 Eligible Bidders: 3 (of 9 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=65F ri, 26 May 2006 20:25:02 GMT Summary Licenses: Auction No. 65 will
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/rss/index.htm?job=ainf&id=66
  • Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=66F ri, 18 Aug 2006 14:35:01 GMT Summary Licenses: Auction No. 66 will offer 1,122 licenses: 36 Regional Economic Area Grouping (REAG) licenses, 352 Economic Area (EA) licenses, and 734 Cellular Market Area (CMA) licenses. Qualified Bidders: 168 Rounds Completed: 26 Bidding Days: 8 Results for Round 26 Gross Revenue: $11,316,866,900.00 - Dollar Change: 125992000.00 - % Change: 1.13 Net Revenue: $11,115,653,700.00 - Dollar Change: 125205350.00 - % Change: 1.14 New Bids: 295 Withdrawn Bids: 0 Proactive Waivers: 0 Bidders that Reduced Eligibility: 7 Licenses with PWBs*: 865 FCC Held Licenses: 257 Eligible Bidders: 137 (of 168 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=66F ri, 18 Aug 2006 16:50:06 GMT Summary Licenses: Auction No. 66 will offer
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fc99418a.txt
  • -33.3% 0.07 0.1% 16.7% 6 to 12 0.19 0.3% 0.09 0.1% -52.6% 0.08 0.1% -11.1% 5 or less 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.0% Not Avail. 1.22 - 1.20 - -1.6% 2.13 - 77.5% Total 62.43 - 64.44 - 3.2% 66.05 - 2.5% Sys. w/30+ channels 60.08 98.2% 62.48 98.8% 4.0% 63.03 98.6% 0.9% Sys. w/less than 30 1.13 1.8% 0.76 1.2% -32.7% 0.89 1.4% 17.1% Notes: Figures are as of October 1, 1997, October 1, 1998, and October 1, 1999. All "Percent of Subscribers" calculations exclude "not available" data, including the percentage tabulations in the categories of "Systems with 30+ channels" and "Systems with less than 30 channels." Sources: 1997: Warren Publishing, Inc., Channel Capacity of Existing Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc98335.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc98335.txt
  • 0.1% -33.3% 6 to 12 0.19 0.3% 0.19 0.3% 0.0% 0.09 0.1% -52.6% 5 or less 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.0% Not Avail. 0.09 - 1.22 - 1255.6% 1.20 - -1.6% Total 60.83 - 62.43 - 2.6% 64.44 - 3.2% Sys. w/30+ channels 59.64 98.2% 60.08 98.2% 0.7% 62.5 98.8% 4.0% Sys. w/less than 30 1.10 1.8% 1.13 1.8% 2.7% 0.8 1.2% -32.7% Note: Figures are as of October 1, 1996, October 1, 1997, and October 30, 1998. Note: All "Percentage of Systems" calculation excludes "not available" data, (this includes the percentage tabulations in the categories of "Systems with 30+ channels" and "Systems with less than 30 channels.") Sources: ! !1996: Warren Publishing, Inc., Channel Capacity of Existing
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.txt
  • differences that we find for non-dispatch UNE-P orders (measured in days), are summarized in the Table below. Estimated Difference in Average Completed Intervals for Non-dispatch UNE-P Orders June July August BA CLEC Diff BA CLEC Diff BA CLEC Diff Carrier to carrier metrics data 1.25 3.20 -1.95* 0.99 2.55 -1.56* 1.07 1.91 -0.84* Using properly "W" coded CLEC orders 1.25 1.13 0.12 0.99 1.31 -0.32 1.07 2.36 -1.29 Adjustment to CLEC data for difference in standard intervals +0.53 +0.04 -0.62 CLEC data revised for alleged biases 1.25 1.68 -0.43* 0.99 1.35 -0.36* 1.07 1.74 -0.67* The top line in the table is the Average Completed Interval data reported in the Carrier to Carrier report for both Bell Atlantic retail orders and
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.txt
  • Attach. A. The September to November missed appointment rate, PR 4-04, is 8.13 percent for Verizon and 7.09 percent for [competing carriers]. The December rate was 6.96 for Verizon and 10.31 for competing LECs. See PR 4-04 (Provisioning, POTS, percent Missed Appointments, Verizon, Dispatch, Loop - New). The percentage of installation troubles reported on voice grade loops for competitors were 1.13 percent in September, .98 percent in October, .80 percent in November and .74 in December. The comparable numbers for Verizon were 2.39 in September, 1.87 in October, 1.77 in November and 1.60 in December. See PR 6-02 (Provisioning, POTS, percent Installation Troubles reported within 7 Days - Loop). Results for the mean time to repair measure, Mean Time to Repair
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2002/fcc02331.pdf
  • at 6355, para. 230; SWBT Texas Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 18366-67, paras. 22-27. 268 See Florida/Tennessee A.1.9.1 (FOC Timeliness ­ Mechanized ­ Residence); Florida/Tennessee A.1.9.2 (FOC Timeliness ­ Mechanized ­ Business); Florida/Tennessee A.1.9.3 (FOC Timeliness ­ Mechanized ­ Design Specials); Florida/Tennessee A.1.12.1 (FOC Timeliness ­ Partially Mechanized ­ Residence); Florida/Tennessee A.1.12.2 (FOC Timeliness ­ Partially Mechanized ­ Business); Florida/Tennessee A.1.13.1 (FOC Timeliness ­ Non - Mechanized ­ Residence); Florida/Tennessee A.1.13.2 (FOC Timeliness ­ Non - Mechanized ­ Business); Florida/Tennessee A.1.13.3 (FOC Timeliness ­ Non - Mechanized ­ Design Specials); Florida/Tennessee B.1.9.3 (FOC Timeliness ­ Mechanized Loop and Port Combinations); Florida/Tennessee B.1.9.14 (FOC Timeliness ­ Mechanized ­ Other Design); Florida/Tennessee B.1.9.15 (FOC Timeliness ­ Mechanized ­ Other Non - Design); Florida/Tennessee
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ldrpt101.pdf
  • 15 Industry Average Revenue per Minute Average Revenue per Average Revenue per International Domestic Minute for Interstate and Minute for Interstate and Calls 1/ Calls International Calls International Calls Restated Restated in 1999 in 1999 Dollars Dollars 1930 $0.27 $2.74 1965 $0.24 $1.27 1931 0.27 2.95 1966 0.24 1.25 1932 0.26 3.19 1967 0.24 1.21 1933 0.28 3.53 1968 0.24 1.13 1934 0.27 3.38 1969 0.24 1.09 1935 0.27 3.23 1970 0.23 0.99 1936 0.25 3.01 1971 0.25 1.01 1937 0.22 2.51 1972 0.24 0.97 1938 0.21 2.53 1973 0.25 0.95 1939 0.22 2.59 1974 0.26 0.87 1940 0.21 2.50 1975 0.27 0.85 1941 0.21 2.35 1976 0.29 0.83 1942 0.22 2.21 1977 0.28 0.78 1943 0.21 2.03 1978 0.29 0.73
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/pntris03.pdf
  • by Level of Lifeline Assistance Avg. State Year $ Support Lifeline per Line Change Change Change Change State BeganDecember 2002 March 1984March 1997March 2003 March 1984March 1997March 2003 Low-Income Households All Households 1984 to 1997 1997 to 2003 1984 to 1997 1997 to 2003 Ohio 1987 0.96 81.0% 88.5% 93.1% 7.5% * 4.6%* 93.2% 95.0% 96.3% 1.8% 1.3% Oklahoma 1996 1.13 81.9% 78.9% 82.0% -3.0% 3.1% 91.0% 91.8% 92.8% 0.7% 1.0% Oregon 1986 3.50 76.4% 90.5% 92.9% 14.1% * 2.3% 91.4% 95.3% 96.7% 3.9% * 1.4% Pennsylvania 1996 1.20 85.6% 93.6% 93.9% 8.0% * 0.3% 94.4% 97.3% 97.4% 3.0% * 0.0% Rhode Island 1987 3.40 86.4% 87.6% 92.9% 1.2% 5.2% 94.0% 94.6% 97.4% 0.5% 2.8% South Carolina 1995 3.49 66.1% 76.2%
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • Table 1.10 Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Single Line (As of October 15, 2001).....................18 Table 1.11 Monthly Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Single Line (As of October 15), 1990-2001...........................................20 Table 1.12 Connection Charges for a Single Business Line in the Sample Cities (As of October 15), 1990-2001...............22 Table 1.13 Average Local rates for a Business with a Key-System Line in Urban Areas (As of October 15, 2001).....................24 Table 1.14 Average Local Rates for a Business with a Key-System Line in Urban Areas (As of October 15), 1989-2001...........25 Table 1.15 Monthly Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Key-System Line (As of October 15), 1990-2001...........................................26 Table
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • Table 1.10 Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Single Line (As of October 15, 2002) Table 1.11 Monthly Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Single Line (As of October 15), 1990-2002 Table 1.12 Connection Charges for a Single Business Line in the Sample Cities (As of October 15), 1990-2002 Table 1.13 Average Local rates for a Business with a Key-System Line in Urban Areas (As of October 15, 2002) Table 1.14 Average Local Rates for a Business with a Key-System Line in Urban Areas (As of October 15), 1989-2002 Table 1.15 Monthly Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Key- System Line (As of October 15), 1990-2002
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • Table 1.10 Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Single Line (As of October 15, 2003) Table 1.11 Monthly Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Single Line (As of October 15), 1993-2003 Table 1.12 Connection Charges for a Single Business Line in the Sample Cities (As of October 15), 1993-2003 Table 1.13 Standard Deviation Analysis of Residential Rates in the Sample Cities (As of October 15, 2003) Table 1.14 Historical Standard Deviation Analysis of Residential Rates in the Sample Cities (As of October 15) ii Table 1.15 Average Revenue per Minute for Interstate Toll Service Calls II. Expenditures on Telephone Service......................................................II-1 A. Residential Expenditures..................................................................II-2 B. Business Expenditures.....................................................................II-2 C. Additional Sources of Information
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • Table 1.10 Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Single Line (As of October 15, 2004) Table 1.11 Monthly Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Single Line (As of October 15), 1994-2004 Table 1.12 Connection Charges for a Single Business Line in the Sample Cities (As of October 15), 1994-2004 Table 1.13 Standard Deviation Analysis of Residential Rates in the Sample Cities (As of October 15, 2004) Table 1.14 Historical Standard Deviation Analysis of Residential Rates in the Sample Cities (As of October 15) ii Table 1.15 Average Revenue per Minute for Interstate Toll Service Calls II. Expenditures on Telephone Service......................................................II-1 A. Residential Expenditures..................................................................II-2 B. Business Expenditures.....................................................................II-2 C. Additional Sources of Information
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref97.pdf
  • 1.68 1.22 0.98 Tax including 911 charges 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.00 Total monthly charge 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.71 Additional local five-minute call 0.093 0.093 0.091 0.093 0.094 0.092 0.091 Inside wiring maintenance 1.78 1.91 2.05 2.03 2.08 2.26 2.39 Rotary connection charge 71.05 71.36 72.75 72.55 71.41 69.88 67.87 Extra for Touch-tone 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 Tax 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.18 Total charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.32 Additional charge if drop line and connection block are needed 5.92 7.87 6.90 6.83 6.64 6.49 7.28 Some previous estimates have been revised. 5 Rate based on unlimited service where available, and measured service with 200 same-zone 6 local
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • Rates for Businesses with a Single Line, 1989-1997...................17 Table 1.10 Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Single Line as of October 15, 1997.........................18 Table 1.11 Monthly Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Single Line, 1990-1997...20 Table 1.12 Connection Charges for a Single Business Line in the Sample Cities, 1990-1997..........22 Table 1.13 Average Local rates for a Business with a Key System Line as of October 15, 1997......24 Table 1.14 Average Local Rates for a Business with a Key System Line, 1989-1997...............25 Table 1.15 Monthly Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Key System Line, 1990-1997...26 Table 1.16 Connection Charges in the Sample Cities for Three Key System Business
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • Rates for Businesses with a Single Line, 1989-1998.................17 Table 1.10 Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Single Line as of October 15, 1998.......................18 Table 1.11 Monthly Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Single Line, 1990-1998..20 Table 1.12 Connection Charges for a Single Business Line in the Sample Cities, 1990-1998.........22 Table 1.13 Average Local rates for a Business with a Key System Line as of October 15, 1998.....24 Table 1.14 Average Local Rates for a Business with a Key System Line, 1989-1998.............25 Table 1.15 Monthly Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Key System Line, 1990-1998...26 Table 1.16 Connection Charges in the Sample Cities for Three Key System Business
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-95.pdf
  • 1.08 MAINE 83.80 1.19 MARYLAND 99.81 1.00 MASSACHUSETTS 99.91 1.00 MICHIGAN 96.70 1.03 MINNESOTA 75.47 1.33 MISSISSIPPI 93.75 1.07 MISSOURI 93.36 1.07 MONTANA 69.54 1.44 NEBRASKA 87.24 1.15 NEVADA 31.46 3.18 NEW HAMPSHIRE 93.98 1.06 NEW JERSEY 99.85 1.00 NEW MEXICO 90.92 1.10 NEW YORK 96.82 1.03 NORTH CAROLINA 83.60 1.20 NORTH DAKOTA 70.80 1.41 OHIO 86.60 1.15 OKLAHOMA 88.72 1.13 OREGON 91.84 1.09 PENNSYLVANIA 94.80 1.05 RHODE ISLAND 100.00 1.00 SOUTH CAROLINA 74.74 1.34 SOUTH DAKOTA 77.77 1.29 TENNESSEE 87.77 1.14 TEXAS 93.88 1.07 UTAH 95.56 1.05 VERMONT 84.27 1.19 VIRGINIA 97.38 1.03 WASHINGTON 91.13 1.10 WEST VIRGINIA 83.52 1.20 WISCONSIN 81.43 1.23 WYOMING 83.04 1.20 Weighted Average 92.60 1.08 -10 Table 4 Local Exchange Except Wireless Basic Misc Rev
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-96.pdf
  • 1.70 0.92 1.72 0.02 OREGON 1.67 1.00 0.67 1.05 0.62 (0.05) PENNSYLVANIA 0.30 0.91 (0.61) 0.91 (0.61) 0.01 RHODE ISLAND 0.24 1.02 (0.78) 1.11 (0.87) (0.10) SOUTH CAROLINA 1.98 0.94 1.04 1.06 0.91 (0.13) SOUTH DAKOTA 3.94 0.95 3.00 1.24 2.70 (0.29) TENNESSEE 0.75 0.96 (0.21) 0.98 (0.23) (0.02) TEXAS 0.96 0.91 0.05 0.82 0.14 0.09 UTAH 0.78 1.00 (0.22) 1.13 (0.35) (0.13) VERMONT 2.88 1.01 1.87 1.30 1.58 (0.29) VIRGINIA 0.30 0.98 (0.68) 1.10 (0.80) (0.12) WASHINGTON 1.21 0.98 0.23 1.03 0.18 (0.05) WEST VIRGINIA 1.90 0.95 0.95 1.01 0.89 (0.06) WISCONSIN 1.37 0.89 0.48 0.79 0.58 0.09 WYOMING 6.49 1.08 5.42 1.39 5.10 (0.31) UNITED STATES $0.87 0.95 (0.08) 0.95 (0.08) 0.00 GUAM 1.33 0.00 1.33 0.95 0.39 (0.95)
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-97.pdf
  • 0.29 8,244 1.35 NEBRASKA 3,723 0.31 2,909 0.24 814 0.07 NEVADA 1,029 0.07 4,524 0.31 (3,494) (0.24) NEW HAMPSHIRE 1,583 0.16 3,174 0.32 (1,590) (0.16) NEW JERSEY 0 0.00 20,651 0.28 (20,651) (0.28) NEW MEXICO 5,929 0.55 3,247 0.30 2,682 0.25 NEW YORK 7,009 0.05 34,227 0.22 (27,218) (0.18) NORTH CAROLINA 13,016 0.23 13,231 0.23 (215) (0.00) NORTH DAKOTA 5,441 1.13 1,313 0.27 4,128 0.86 OHIO 5,190 0.06 15,866 0.20 (10,676) (0.13) OKLAHOMA 15,826 0.67 5,248 0.22 10,578 0.45 OREGON 10,471 0.43 6,119 0.25 4,353 0.18 PENNSYLVANIA 14,037 0.15 20,117 0.21 (6,080) (0.06) RHODE ISLAND 0 0.00 2,143 0.27 (2,143) (0.27) SOUTH CAROLINA 9,971 0.39 6,698 0.26 3,273 0.13 SOUTH DAKOTA 4,332 0.89 1,418 0.29 2,913 0.60 TENNESSEE 9,452 0.24 9,362
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-99.pdf
  • 89.21 24.76 113.97 Connecticut 24.29 4.65 7.87 36.12 1.51 0.80 75.24 20.20 95.44 Delaware 23.71 4.63 3.75 39.03 0.99 0.56 72.67 21.23 93.90 District of Columbia 32.34 3.76 0.03 30.96 3.58 1.04 71.72 44.85 116.57 Florida 28.79 5.08 12.01 31.39 2.57 0.74 80.58 20.83 101.41 Georgia 37.64 4.96 9.45 32.80 2.08 0.90 87.83 22.26 110.10 Hawaii 35.42 4.76 3.82 27.79 1.13 0.96 73.88 18.23 92.11 Idaho 27.91 5.33 7.66 37.77 0.00 1.25 79.92 16.91 96.83 Illinois 30.09 4.48 12.35 27.52 2.27 0.59 77.31 21.51 98.82 Indiana 27.72 4.63 14.84 25.99 1.11 0.72 75.02 16.36 91.39 Iowa 22.31 5.07 13.73 30.04 2.33 0.85 74.32 21.09 95.41 Kansas 30.28 4.62 12.48 30.43 4.77 0.73 83.30 17.78 101.08 Kentucky 35.20 4.96 12.13 30.18 0.89
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend100.pdf
  • 21,337,780 0.44 RSL COM U.S.A., Inc. 112,743,948 737,224,307 157,366,511 3.28 Sprint 33,344,436 150,078,620 89,244,650 1.86 Star Telecommunications, Inc. 379,774,858 2,435,960,499 709,161,916 14.78 Startec Global Communications 6,225,423 388,148,923 153,268,132 3.19 Telco Holdings, Inc. 6,339,883 60,181,503 37,891,716 0.79 Telegroup, Inc. 44,963,602 899,272,038 281,022,512 5.86 Tel-Save, Inc. 38,882,542 255,768,649 35,672,057 0.74 UniDial, Incorporated 3,568,538 17,123,651 9,915,738 0.21 URSUS Telecom Corporation 15,907,254 111,514,724 54,241,946 1.13 US Wats, Inc. 8,439,774 25,319,322 10,127,729 0.21 US WEST Communications, Inc. 5,669,898 111,877,388 35,373,850 0.74 USA Global Link, Inc. 8,039,021 46,719,184 18,423,265 0.38 VarTec Telecom, Inc. 17,010,065 76,754,929 73,453,061 1.53 Viatel, Inc. including Flat Rate Communications 33,394,996 141,345,427 63,230,870 1.32 Working Assets Funding Services, Inc. 2,527,953 20,472,795 15,668,603 0.33 World-Link, Inc. 2,280,362 13,304,301 11,606,677 0.24 Carriers not shown above 160,330,779
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend199.pdf
  • billed in these points as well as $43 million of calls between the domestic United States and these points. 7 - 6 TABLE 7.5 TOP PROVIDERS OF PURE RESALE INTERNATIONAL MTS IN 1997 Percent Number of Number of U.S. Carrier of Total Messages Minutes Revenue IMTS Resale Revenue ACC Corporation 31,071,111 136,696,036 $37,077,152 0.90% Access Authority, Inc. 19,884,024 189,346,852 46,420,711 1.13 ATI Telecom, Inc. 8,939,513 71,220,568 28,128,553 0.68 AT&T Corp. 13,832,459 61,220,406 42,731,843 1.04 BPG International, Inc. (BPGI) 17,349,936 78,942,211 21,648,544 0.53 Brittan Communications International Corporation (BCI) 1,428,396 10,377,286 12,750,202 0.31 Business Telecom, Inc (BTI) 13,163,705 61,163,975 30,441,795 0.74 Cable & Wireless, Inc. 281,391,293 1,228,090,784 503,484,245 12.25 Call Concepts Corporation 7,515,588 26,222,297 14,135,492 0.34 CapRock Communications Corporation 4,615,204 27,968,135 13,984,067 0.34
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • 0.39 0.33 0.25 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.22 5.19 5.27 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 43.22 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 85 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $71.05 $71.36 $72.75 $72.55 $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 $67.87 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.12 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 4.49 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85 73.29 70.09 72.48 5.92 7.87 6.90 6.83 6.64 6.49 7.28 6.98 6.54 6.54 6.65 $1.78 $1.91 $2.05 $2.03 $2.08 $2.26 $2.39 $2.63 $2.84 $3.04 $3.51 Table 14.3 Average Monthly Local Rates of RUS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend298.pdf
  • Extra for Touch-tone 2.48 2.39 1.87 1.73 1.68 1.22 0.98 0.83 0.45 Tax including 911 Charges 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.20 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.58 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call $0.0929$0.0933$0.0912$0.0931$0.0942$0.0923$0.0925$0.0923$0.0921 Basic Connection Charge $71.05$71.36$72.75$72.55$71.41$69.88$67.87$68.47$68.58 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 Tax 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.2 4.42 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85 73.18 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed 5.92 7.87 6.90 6.83 6.64 6.49 7.28 6.98 6.86 Lowest-cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan $1.78 $1.91 $2.05 $2.03 $2.08 $2.26 $2.39 $2.63 $2.76
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend299.pdf
  • 14,567 2,179 5,248 1,396 Pacific Telesis 3.50 5.27 5.29 1.01 0.03 0.04 0.01 8,692 2,708 4,639 1,837 SBC 3.50 6.07 7.34 1.04 0.57 0.57 0.07 9,115 1,801 3,891 677 U S WEST 3.50 6.07 7.86 1.04 2.53 4.20 0.64 10,232 1,539 4,014 888 RBOCs 3.50 5.81 6.78 1.04 1.67 2.77 0.37 76,972 14,071 30,059 11,573 Aliant 3.50 6.07 6.77 1.04 1.13 1.13 0.35 182 16 47 30 Cincinnati Bell 3.50 6.07 6.30 1.04 2.09 2.09 0.23 645 79 213 72 Citizens 3.50 5.99 9.09 1.04 2.37 4.20 1.05 709 41 121 53 Frontier 3.50 5.57 5.88 1.04 1.52 1.95 0.31 648 70 171 81 GTE 3.50 6.07 8.62 1.04 2.53 4.31 0.82 12,294 1,415 3,219 1,207 SNET 3.50 6.07 8.02 1.04
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
  • with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 85 85 85 Cost of a Five-Minute Same-Zone Business-Day Call $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 $0.09 Basic Connection Charge $71.05 $71.36 $72.75 $72.55 $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 $67.87 $67.77 $67.84 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 Taxes, Including 911 Charges 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 4.53 4.40 4.42 Total Connection Charge $76.81 $77.40 $78.20 $78.07 $76.83 $74.93 $72.31 $72.85 $73.29 $70.09 $72.55 $72.29 $72.38 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed $5.92 $7.87 $6.90 $6.83 $6.64 $6.49 $7.28 $6.98
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • 1995 2.6 2 0.1 2 -3.8 2 1996 0.9 0.2 3.7 0.7 6.1 0.9 1997 1.0 0.2 -4.3 7.8 2.8 -4.3 1998 1.3 -0.1 -0.8 -0.4 1.5 -3.7 1999 2.8 0.2 -0.7 2.3 -1.6 -2.7 2000 5.5 1.6 -11.2 -4.3 -6.0 0.1 2001 5.2 2.2 -4.0 -5.5 -2.9 0.7 2002 4.5 2.2 -4.7 -17.7 -3.7 0.8 2003 4.1 1.73 -8.2 -1.13 -8.8 -9.03 Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics. CPI PPI CPI PPI CPI PPI Table 12.3 Annual Changes in Price Indices for Local and Long Distance Telephone Services Local Residential Service Toll Service 1 Interstate Intrastate 3 Preliminary and subject to revision. 1 The CPI toll indices represent rates for households. Through 1994, PPI toll indices represent rate changes for both
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • 1996 0.9 0.2 3.7 0.7 6.1 0.9 1997 1.0 0.2 -4.3 7.8 2.8 -4.3 1998 1.3 -0.1 -0.8 -0.4 1.5 -3.7 1999 2.8 0.2 -0.7 2.3 -1.6 -2.7 2000 5.5 1.6 -11.2 -4.3 -6.0 0.1 2001 4.5 2.6 -2.0 -9.4 -1.7 1.7 2002 5.3 1.6 -5.9 -18.4 -6.1 -0.3 2003 2.6 2.0 -10.9 -2.5 -9.4 -12.5 2004 1.1 0.23 -8.7 1.13 -6.6 -2.33 Note: Data reflect the percent change from December of the previous year through December of the year shown. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics. CPI PPI CPI PPI CPI PPI Table 12.3 Annual Changes in Price Indices for Local and Long Distance Telephone Services Local Residential Service Toll Service 1 Interstate Intrastate 3 Preliminary and subject to revision. 1
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
  • Resale International MTS in 1999 Percent Number of Number of U.S. Carrier of Total Messages Minutes Revenues IMTS Resale Revenues Access Authority, Inc. 9,762,704 69,902,160 $20,870,738 0.46% ACS Systems, Inc. d.b.a LD Exchange.com 44,781,532 203,974,633 58,847,458 1.30 ALLTEL Corporation 1,459,787 10,844,746 5,451,108 0.12 AT&T Corp. 141,932,631 884,898,390 254,016,193 5.61 BellSouth Corporation 34,045,495 106,471,859 28,799,468 0.64 Broadwing Companies 56,820,588 220,064,637 51,128,611 1.13 Business Telecom, Inc. (BTI) 9,102,584 45,516,432 12,553,650 0.28 CapRock Telecommunications Corporation 25,518,740 176,080,786 43,391,366 0.96 Capsule Communications d.b.a. US WATS, Inc. 10,394,537 29,554,920 8,751,116 0.19 Communication TeleSystems Int'l., d/b/a CTS and WorldxChange 150,245,283 1,032,966,114 192,876,638 4.26 DirectNet Telecommunications 50,822,341 272,088,214 75,924,324 1.68 eGlobe 3,148,536 30,418,884 7,549,525 0.17 Elephant Talk, Inc. 5,100,331 61,203,977 20,080,033 0.44 EqualNet Corporation 1,244,525 24,890,502 7,778,282 0.17
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • five and added to multiline business counts. 1 - 7 Table 1.4 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges by Carrier (In Cents per Minute) 1 Rates Effective from 7/1/02-12/31/02 Year 2001 Minutes of Use Carrier (Millions) Common Line per Company Originating Access CCL CCL Local Minute OriginatingTerminating Switching Aliant 0.00¢ 0.00¢ 0.73¢ 0.37¢ 2.24¢ 257 643 913 BellSouth 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.20 1.13 27,108 55,240 76,617 Cincinnati Bell 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.26 1.60 992 2,133 3,134 Citizens 0.12 0.00 0.71 0.54 2.69 2,035 4,506 6,560 Iowa Telecomm 0.03 0.00 0.86 0.27 2.36 413 326 739 Qwest 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.15 1.41 20,509 37,988 58,539 SBC 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.17 1.25 71,493 76,858 149,482 Sprint 0.02 0.00 0.60 0.13 1.52 6,978 18,896 26,128 Valor
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd98.pdf
  • 1967 2/ 40 114 55 60 23 32 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46 127 62 65 28 40 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 65 172 83 89 38 52 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81 197 99 98 51 60 2.43 1.22 1.21 1.17 1.19 1971 101 237 121 117 68 75 2.35 1.20 1.16 1.10 1.13 1972 127 292 148 144 92 99 2.31 1.17 1.14 1.08 1.11 1973 159 365 184 180 112 120 2.29 1.16 1.13 1.08 1.11 1974 191 429 217 212 142 152 2.25 1.14 1.11 1.07 1.09 1975 219 490 247 243 167 177 2.23 1.13 1.11 1.06 1.09 1976 273 601 303 298 197 207 2.20 1.11 1.09 1.05 1.08
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd99.pdf
  • 1967 2/ 40 114 55 60 23 32 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46 127 62 65 28 40 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 65 172 83 89 38 52 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81 197 99 98 51 60 2.43 1.22 1.21 1.17 1.19 1971 101 237 121 117 68 75 2.35 1.20 1.16 1.10 1.13 1972 127 292 148 144 92 99 2.31 1.17 1.14 1.08 1.11 1973 159 365 184 180 112 120 2.29 1.16 1.13 1.08 1.11 1974 191 429 217 212 142 152 2.25 1.14 1.11 1.07 1.09 1975 219 490 247 243 167 177 2.23 1.13 1.11 1.06 1.09 1976 273 601 303 298 197 207 2.20 1.11 1.09 1.05 1.08
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd00.pdf
  • 1.61 1967 39.7 114.2 54.6 59.6 23.4 31.8 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46.4 126.9 61.5 65.4 28.2 40.0 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 64.6 172.0 82.7 89.4 38.3 51.6 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81.1 196.6 98.9 97.7 51.0 59.8 2.43 1.22 1.21 1.17 1.19 1971 100.9 237.4 120.7 116.6 68.4 75.1 2.35 1.20 1.16 1.10 1.13 1972 126.5 291.8 148.2 143.6 91.7 98.6 2.31 1.17 1.14 1.08 1.11 1973 159.3 364.9 184.4 180.5 111.5 120.2 2.29 1.16 1.13 1.08 1.11 1974 190.7 428.7 216.6 212.1 142.0 152.2 2.25 1.14 1.11 1.07 1.09 1975 219.4 490.2 247.4 242.9 167.0 176.9 2.23 1.13 1.11 1.06 1.09 1976 272.7 601.1 303.0 298.1 197.2 207.2 2.20 1.11 1.09 1.05 1.08
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd01.pdf
  • 1.61 1967 39.7 114.2 54.6 59.6 23.4 31.8 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46.4 126.9 61.5 65.4 28.2 40.0 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 64.6 172.0 82.7 89.4 38.3 51.6 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81.1 196.6 98.9 97.7 51.0 59.8 2.43 1.22 1.21 1.17 1.19 1971 100.9 237.4 120.7 116.6 68.4 75.1 2.35 1.20 1.16 1.10 1.13 1972 126.5 291.8 148.2 143.6 91.7 98.6 2.31 1.17 1.14 1.08 1.11 1973 159.3 364.9 184.4 180.5 111.5 120.2 2.29 1.16 1.13 1.08 1.11 1974 190.7 428.7 216.6 212.1 142.0 152.2 2.25 1.14 1.11 1.07 1.09 1975 219.4 490.2 247.4 242.9 167.0 176.9 2.23 1.13 1.11 1.06 1.09 1976 272.7 601.1 303.0 298.1 197.2 207.2 2.20 1.11 1.09 1.05 1.08
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-1.pdf
  • to support universal service is equal to the payments made from USAC to carriers for universal service mechanisms plus administration costs. Contributions on a per-state basis are computed by multiplying nationwide contributions by the ratio of interstate end-user revenues in each state to nationwide interstate end-user revenues. Estimates of interstate end-user revenues for 2001 by state are reported in Table 1.13. Each state's share of interstate end user revenues is reported in Table 1.12.18 The remainder of this appendix provides a detailed description on how revenues are allocated to the states. Tables 1.5 and 1.6 present nationwide data on telecommunications revenues derived from information filed on Form 499-A Telecommunications Reporting Worksheets. Nationwide (cumulative) telecommunications revenues from these tables are divided into
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-2.pdf
  • 13.00 13.00 13.00 North Dakota 5.25 7.75 7.72 0.00 3.50 2.25 0.00 1.75 1.12 5.25 9.50 8.84 5.25 13.00 11.09 N. Marianna Islands 6.75 6.75 6.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 Ohio 6.94 7.75 7.27 0.00 3.50 0.96 0.00 1.75 0.48 6.94 9.50 7.75 6.94 13.00 8.71 Oklahoma 5.25 7.75 7.15 0.00 1.16 1.13 0.00 0.58 0.57 5.25 8.33 7.72 5.25 9.49 8.85 Oregon 7.75 7.75 7.75 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.50 9.50 9.50 13.00 13.00 13.00 Pennsylvania 6.01 7.75 7.72 0.00 2.50 1.20 0.00 1.25 0.60 6.01 9.00 8.32 6.01 11.50 9.52 Puerto Rico 6.75 7.75 7.75 3.30 3.50 3.31 1.65 1.75 1.66 8.40 9.50 9.41 11.70 13.00 12.72 Rhode Island
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • BLANCA TELEPHONE CO. 4.66 5.88 -1.16 0.39 462184 C DELTA COUNTY TELE-COMM INC. 4.15 3.07 1.05 -3.04 462185 C CENTURYTEL OF EAGLE, INC. 2.83 2.14 0.68 -0.60 462186 C EASTERN SLOPE RURAL TEL ASSN INC 31.09 2.84 27.46 104.02 462187 C EL PASO COUNTY MUTUAL TEL CO 17.95 3.55 13.92 65.94 462188 C FARMERS TEL CO, INC. - COLORADO 22.14 1.13 20.78 29.13 462190 C HAXTUN TELEPHONE COMPANY 14.76 4.31 10.01 19.07 462192 C BIG SANDY TELECOM, INC. 14.42 5.50 8.45 18.98 462193 C NUCLA-NATURITA TEL. CO. -5.78 1.06 -6.76 -20.97 462194 C NUNN TEL. COMPANY 24.82 10.72 12.73 29.53 462195 C SOUTH PARK TELEPHONE COMPANY 3.77 34.26 -22.71 1.10 462196 C PEETZ COOP. TEL. CO. 13.10 0.87 12.13 20.73 462197
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 43.57 43.35 43.35 44.45 45.57 46.40 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 85 85 85 86 Cost of a Five-Minute Business-Day Same-Zone Call $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 $0.09 $0.09 Basic Connection Charge $71.05$71.36$72.75$72.55$71.41$69.88$67.87$68.47$68.67$65.83$67.87$67.77$67.04$67.25 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 Taxes 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 4.53 4.40 4.69 4.97 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85 73.29 70.09 72.55 72.29 71.86 72.35 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed $5.92 $7.87 $6.90 $6.83 $6.64 $6.49 $7.28 $6.98
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-intro.pdf
  • Causes ....................................................................................... Table 9.3 Switching Systems .................................................................................................. Table 10.1 Taxes ................................................................................................................ Table 11.11 Telecommunications Industry Revenues by Service .......................................... Table 1.2 Telecommunications Industry Revenues - Total ...................................................Table 1.1 Telecommunications Revenues by Type of Carrier ............................................. Table 1.3 Telecommunications Revenues - Interstate ........................................................ Table 1.16 Telecommunications Revenues - Intrastate ........................................................ Table 1.15 Telecommunications Revenues - Total - by State ................................................ Table 1.13 Telecommunications Revenues - 2001................................... ................... Table 1.14 Transmission Systems ............................................................................................. Table 10.2 Universal Service Program Requirements and Fund Factors ................................. Table 1.10 Universal Service Support - Distribution of Disbursements ........................... Chart 1.1 Universal Service Support Mechanisms ................................................... Table 1.11 Universal Service Support Mechanisms - by State ..................................... Table 1.12 Unseparated Non-Trafffic Sensitive Revenue Requirement - by Jurisdiction ....... Table 3.19
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • to support universal service is equal to the payments made from USAC to carriers for universal service mechanisms plus administration costs. Contributions on a per-state basis are computed by multiplying nationwide contributions by the ratio of interstate end-user revenues in each state to nationwide interstate end-user revenues. Estimates of interstate end-user revenues for 2002 by state are reported in Table 1.13. Each state's share of interstate end user revenues is reported in Table 1.12.19 The remainder of this appendix provides a detailed description on how revenues are allocated to the states. Tables 1.5 and 1.6 present nationwide data on telecommunications revenues derived from information filed on Form 499-A Telecommunications Reporting Worksheets. Nationwide (cumulative) telecommunications revenues from these tables are divided into
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • 0.19 0.34 0.70 0.20 2.33 Louisiana 1.73 0.00 0.00 0.56 0.21 0.34 0.23 3.08 Maine 0.68 0.00 0.55 0.58 0.42 0.01 0.79 3.04 Maryland 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.04 0.01 0.07 Massachusetts 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.03 Michigan 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.05 0.00 0.11 0.62 Minnesota 0.77 0.02 0.00 0.36 0.50 0.14 0.48 2.27 Mississippi 1.13 0.00 7.17 0.31 0.25 1.04 0.19 10.10 Missouri 0.97 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.39 0.35 0.21 2.16 Montana 4.37 0.00 1.65 1.63 1.28 0.15 1.46 10.54 Nebraska 1.29 0.01 0.00 0.37 0.79 0.41 0.99 3.86 Nevada 0.54 0.01 0.00 0.07 0.16 0.58 0.50 1.85 New Hampshire 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.14 0.37 0.52 1.29 New Jersey 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-6.pdf
  • by Level of Lifeline Assistance Avg. State Year $ Support Lifeline per Line Change Change Change Change State BeganDecember 2002 March 1984March 1997March 2003 March 1984March 1997March 2003 Low-Income Households All Households 1984 to 1997 1997 to 2003 1984 to 1997 1997 to 2003 Ohio 1987 0.96 81.0% 88.5% 93.1% 7.5% * 4.6%* 93.2% 95.0% 96.3% 1.8% 1.3% Oklahoma 1996 1.13 81.9% 78.9% 82.0% -3.0% 3.1% 91.0% 91.8% 92.8% 0.7% 1.0% Oregon 1986 3.50 76.4% 90.5% 92.9% 14.1% * 2.3% 91.4% 95.3% 96.7% 3.9% * 1.4% Pennsylvania 1996 1.20 85.6% 93.6% 93.9% 8.0% * 0.3% 94.4% 97.3% 97.4% 3.0% * 0.0% Rhode Island 1987 3.40 86.4% 87.6% 92.9% 1.2% 5.2% 94.0% 94.6% 97.4% 0.5% 2.8% South Carolina 1995 3.49 66.1% 76.2%
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
  • 44.45 45.57 44.61 44.60 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 85 85 85 86 85 Cost of a Five-Minute Business-Day Same-Zone Call $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.10 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 Basic Connection Charge $71.05$71.36$72.75$72.55$71.41$69.88$67.87$68.47$68.67$65.83$67.87$67.77$67.04$67.29$67.26 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service**** 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 **** **** Taxes 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 4.53 4.40 4.69 5.09 5.36 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85 73.29 70.09 72.55 72.29 71.86 72.39 72.62 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed $5.92 $7.87 $6.90 $6.83 $6.64
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-intro.pdf
  • Systems .................................................................................................. Table 10.1 5 Index of Tables and Charts Taxes ................................................................................................................ Table 11.11 Telecommunications Industry Revenues by Service ............................................. Table 1.2 Telecommunications Industry Revenues - Total ...................................................Table 1.1 Telecommunications Revenues by Type of Carrier ..............................................Table 1.3 Telecommunications Revenues - Interstate ........................................................ Table 1.16 Telecommunications Revenues - Intrastate ........................................................ Table 1.15 Telecommunications Revenues - Total - by State ................................................. Table 1.13 Telecommunications Revenues - 2002................................... ................... Table 1.14 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs ...........................Table 8.3 Transmission Systems ............................................................................................. Table 10.2 Universal Service Program Requirements and Contribution Factors ..................... Table 1.10 Universal Service Support - Distribution of Universal Service Payments ............ Chart 1.1 Universal Service Support Mechanisms ................................................... Table 1.11 Universal Service Support Mechanisms - by State .......................................
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr97-0.pdf
  • or Loss ......................................................................... Table 6.8 Penetration - Households .................................................................................... Chart 1.1 Penetration - Individual Adults ........................................................................... Chart 1.8 Penetration by Household Size ........................................................................... Table 1.6 Penetration by Household Size - Critical Values ................................................ Table 1.12 Penetration by Household Size - 1996 ................................................................ Chart 1.5 Penetration by Householder's Age ...................................................................... Table 1.7 Penetration by Householder's Age - Critical Values ........................................... Table 1.13 Penetration by Householder's Age - 1996 .......................................................... Chart 1.6 Penetration by Income ........................................................................................ Table 1.5 Penetration by Income - Adjusted for Inflation .................................................. Chart 1.9 Penetration by Income by State - Adjusted for Inflation .................................... Table 1.9 Penetration by Income by State - Sample Sizes ................................................. Table 1.15 Penetration by Income - Critical Values ............................................................. Table 1.11 Penetration by Income
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr97-1.pdf
  • In UnitAvailable In UnitAvailable In UnitAvailable In UnitAvailable TOTAL 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 2.2% 2.0% 4.9% 4.5% 1 PERSON 1.1% 1.0% 1.1% 1.0% 4.1% 3.7% 11.6% 10.9% 2 - 3 0.8% 0.7% 0.8% 0.7% 3.5% 3.0% 7.7% 7.0% 4 - 5 1.1% 1.0% 1.2% 1.0% 4.7% 4.1% 9.0% 8.2% 6 + 2.6% 2.2% 2.8% 2.4% 8.1% 7.2% 14.4% 13.0% TABLE 1.13 CRITICAL VALUES FOR DETERMINING SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES BY HOUSEHOLDER'S AGE HISPANIC TOTAL WHITE BLACK ORIGIN In UnitAvailable In UnitAvailable In UnitAvailable In UnitAvailable TOTAL 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 2.2% 2.0% 4.9% 4.5% 15-24 YRS OLD 1.6% 1.5% 1.7% 1.5% 5.9% 5.7% 11.1% 10.6% 25-54 YRS OLD 0.7% 0.6% 0.7% 0.6% 2.8% 2.4% 6.0% 5.4% 55-59 YRS OLD 2.1% 1.8% 2.1% 1.8%
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-7.pdf
  • Extra for Touch-tone 2.48 2.39 1.87 1.73 1.68 1.22 0.98 0.83 0.45 Tax including 911 Charges 4.41 4.53 4.56 4.77 4.86 4.83 5.01 5.13 5.20 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.58 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call $0.0929$0.0933$0.0912$0.0931$0.0942$0.0923$0.0925$0.0923$0.0921 Basic Connection Charge $71.05$71.36$72.75$72.55$71.41$69.88$67.87$68.47$68.58 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 Tax 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.2 4.42 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85 73.18 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed 5.92 7.87 6.90 6.83 6.64 6.49 7.28 6.98 6.86 Lowest-cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan $1.78 $1.91 $2.05 $2.03 $2.08 $2.26 $2.39 $2.63 $2.76
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-7.pdf
  • 14,567 2,179 5,248 1,396 Pacific Telesis 3.50 5.27 5.29 1.01 0.03 0.04 0.01 8,692 2,708 4,639 1,837 SBC 3.50 6.07 7.34 1.04 0.57 0.57 0.07 9,115 1,801 3,891 677 U S WEST 3.50 6.07 7.86 1.04 2.53 4.20 0.64 10,232 1,539 4,014 888 RBOCs 3.50 5.81 6.78 1.04 1.67 2.77 0.37 76,972 14,071 30,059 11,573 Aliant 3.50 6.07 6.77 1.04 1.13 1.13 0.35 182 16 47 30 Cincinnati Bell 3.50 6.07 6.30 1.04 2.09 2.09 0.23 645 79 213 72 Citizens 3.50 5.99 9.09 1.04 2.37 4.20 1.05 709 41 121 53 Frontier 3.50 5.57 5.88 1.04 1.52 1.95 0.31 648 70 171 81 GTE 3.50 6.07 8.62 1.04 2.53 4.31 0.82 12,294 1,415 3,219 1,207 SNET 3.50 6.07 8.02 1.04
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-7.pdf
  • 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call 9.29¢ 9.33¢ 9.12¢ 9.31¢ 9.42¢ 9.23¢ 9.25¢ 9.23¢ 9.21¢ 9.18¢ Basic Connection Charge $71.05 $71.36 $72.75 $72.55 $71.41 $69.88 $67.87 $68.47 $68.67 $65.83 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 Other Mandatory Payments 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85 73.29 70.09 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed 5.92 7.87 6.90 6.83 6.64 6.49 7.28 6.98 6.54 6.54 Lowest-cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan $1.78 $1.91 $2.05
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • Service 42.72 42.83 43.44 43.82 44.26 43.72 43.75 43.84 43.57 43.35 43.22 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 86 85 85 85 Cost of a Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Call $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 $0.09 Basic Connection Charge $71.05$71.36$72.75$72.55$71.41$69.88$67.87$68.47$68.67$65.83$67.87 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.70 1.89 1.13 1.19 1.17 0.92 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.12 Tax 4.06 4.15 4.32 4.33 4.25 4.13 4.17 4.20 4.45 4.13 4.49 Total Connection Charge 76.81 77.40 78.20 78.07 76.83 74.93 72.31 72.85 73.29 70.09 72.48 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed $5.92 $7.87 $6.90 $6.83 $6.64 $6.49 $7.28 $6.98 $6.54 $6.54 $6.65 Lowest-cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan $1.78
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • -101,164 -0.75 Georgia 79,527 1.27 72,363 1.16 7,165 0.11 Guam 3,266 3.51 672 0.72 2,594 2.79 Hawaii 2,055 0.24 8,618 0.99 -6,564 -0.76 Idaho 35,850 4.07 11,256 1.28 24,595 2.79 Illinois 31,393 0.31 98,842 0.99 -67,450 -0.67 Indiana 30,731 0.70 40,996 0.93 -10,264 -0.23 Iowa 30,431 1.51 21,750 1.08 8,681 0.43 Kansas 67,243 3.26 22,494 1.09 44,749 2.17 Kentucky 29,606 1.13 27,976 1.06 1,630 0.06 Louisiana 72,848 2.35 30,848 0.99 42,000 1.35 Maine 30,713 2.97 10,013 0.97 20,700 2.00 Maryland 2,394 0.05 48,755 1.06 -46,360 -1.01 Massachusetts 1,269 0.02 60,025 1.09 -58,757 -1.07 Michigan 39,571 0.50 63,514 0.81 -23,943 -0.31 Minnesota 48,094 1.31 40,130 1.09 7,964 0.22 Mississippi 133,052 7.81 18,877 1.11 114,175 6.70 Missouri 66,380 1.53 43,176 0.99 23,204 0.53
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • Switch Downtime Causes ....................................................................................... Table 9.3 Switching Systems .................................................................................................. Table 10.1 Taxes ................................................................................................................ Table 11.11 Telecommunications Industry Revenues by Service .......................................... Table 1.2 Telecommunications Industry Revenues - Total ...................................................Table 1.1 Telecommunications Revenues by Type of Carrier ............................................. Table 1.3 Telecommunications Revenues ­ Interstate ........................................................Table 1.16 Telecommunications Revenues ­ Intrastate ........................................................Table 1.15 Telecommunications Revenues ­ Total ­ by State ................................................ Table 1.13 Telecommunications Revenues Used to Allocate Revenues by State ................... Table 1.14 Transmission Systems ............................................................................................. Table 10.2 Universal Service Program Requirements and Fund Factors ................................. Table 1.10 Universal Service Support - Distribution of Disbursements ........................... Chart 1.1 Universal Service Support Mechanisms ................................................... Table 1.11 Universal Service Support Mechanisms - by State ..................................... Table 1.12 Unseparated Non-Trafffic Sensitive Revenue Requirement - by
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/00socc.pdf
  • 0.24 0.15 0.94 8.9NV New Hampshire 40.6 17.8 22.7 10.6 12.2 2.16 0.93 1.67 4.76 7.4NH New Jersey 387.5 202.6 184.9 70.7 114.2 18.04 36.01 12.69 66.74 47.5NJ New Mexico 43.8 32.6 11.2 5.8 5.4 0.99 0.09 0.04 1.12 4.3NM New York 1,165.0 335.0 830.1 533.1 297.0 82.64 26.52 116.26 225.42 71.6NY North Carolina 437.6 317.6 120.0 87.3 32.7 7.61 1.13 2.87 11.62 21.1NC North Dakota 12.3 5.3 7.0 4.9 2.1 1.04 0.11 (0.31) 0.84 1.3ND Ohio 446.1 359.1 87.0 57.4 29.6 1.42 1.54 0.95 3.91 25.7OH Oklahoma 169.0 158.8 10.2 4.0 6.2 (0.95) 0.03 (0.00) (0.92) 7.1OK Oregon 115.1 80.5 34.6 22.9 11.6 1.73 (0.13) (0.55) 1.06 10.6OR Pennsylvania 528.9 264.0 264.9 155.8 109.2 16.06 37.56 9.75 63.37 45.8PA Rhode
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/01socc.pdf
  • $1.80 $1.80 $1.60 $1.42 $1.28 $1.08 $0.85 $0.85 $0.85 Israel 10/ $2.40 $2.40 $2.28 $2.16 $2.16 $1.90 $1.18 $0.70 $0.59 $0.30 $0.30 $0.30 $0.30 Italy 4.6 GF 4.38 GF 1.2 SDR 1.1 SDR0.82 SDR0.48 SDR0.36 SDR0.24 SDR0.16 SDR0.16 SDR0.16 SDR0.16 SDR 0.16 SDR Jamaica $1.65 $1.60 $1.55 $1.50 $1.40 $1.40 $1.30 $1.25 $1.25 $1.05 $0.60 $0.38 $0.38 Japan 10/ 1.34 SDR1.13 SDR0.95 SDR0.75 SDR0.63 SDR0.63 SDR0.63 SDR0.63 SDR0.21 SDR0.21 SDR0.21 SDR0.21 SDR 0.21 SDR Korea, Rep. $2.10 $1.90 $1.60 $1.440.95 SDR0.85 SDR0.85 SDR0.72 SDR $0.85 $0.71 $0.51 $0.38 $0.38 Mexico 11/ $0.79 $0.75 $0.72 $0.68 $0.58 $0.53 $0.49 $0.40 $0.37 $0.19 $0.19 $0.19 $0.19 Morocco 2.5 SDR 2.5 SDR 2.2 SDR 2.2 SDR 2.2 SDR 1.2 SDR 1.0 SDR 0.8 SDR
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/02socc.pdf
  • $1.28 $1.08 $0.85 $0.68 $0.46 $0.46 Israel 8/ 9/ $2.40 $2.28 $2.16 $2.16 $1.90 $1.18 $0.70 $0.59 $0.30 $0.30 $0.30 $0.30 $0.30 Italy 9/ 4.38 GF 1.2 SDR 1.1 SDR0.82 SDR0.48 SDR0.36 SDR0.24 SDR0.16 SDR0.16 SDR0.16 SDR0.16 SDR0.16 SDR 0.16 SDR Jamaica 8/ 9/ $1.60 $1.55 $1.50 $1.40 $1.40 $1.30 $1.25 $1.25 $1.05 $0.60 $0.38 $0.38 $0.38 Japan 8/ 9/ 1.13 SDR0.95 SDR0.75 SDR0.63 SDR0.63 SDR0.63 SDR0.63 SDR0.21 SDR0.21 SDR0.21 SDR0.21 SDR0.21 SDR 0.21 SDR Korea, Rep. 8/ 9/ $1.90 $1.60 $1.440.95 SDR0.85 SDR0.85 SDR0.72 SDR $0.85 $0.71 $0.51 $0.38 $0.38 $0.38 Mexico 8/ 10/ $0.75 $0.72 $0.68 $0.58 $0.53 $0.49 $0.40 $0.37 $0.19 $0.19 $0.19 $0.19 $0.19 Morocco 9/ 2.5 SDR 2.2 SDR 2.2 SDR 2.2 SDR 1.2 SDR 1.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/95socc.pdf
  • $1.60 Israel 1/ $2.40 $2.40 $2.40 $2.40 $2.40 $2.40 $2.28 $2.16 $2.16 $1.90 $1.18 Italy 2/ 5.0 GF 5.0 GF 5.0 GF 5.0 GF 4.6 GF 4.38 GF 1.2 SDR 1.1 SDR 0.82 SDR 0.48 SDR 0.36 SDR Jamaica $1.75 $1.75 $1.75 $1.75 $1.65 $1.60 $1.55 $1.50 $1.40 $1.40 $1.30 Japan 2/ $2.35 $2.35 1.34 SDR 1.34 SDR 1.34 SDR 1.13 SDR 0.95 SDR 0.75 SDR 0.6 SDR 0.63 SDR 0.63 SDR Korea, Rep. $2.60 $2.52 $2.44 $2.36 $2.10 $1.90 $1.60 $1.44 0.95 SDR 0.85 SDR 0.85 SDR Mexico 3/ N/A N/A N/A $1.45 $1.32 $1.16 $1.10 $1.00 $0.91 $0.67 $0.67 Netherlands 1.2 SDR 1.2 SDR 1.2 SDR 1.1 SDR 1.1 SDR 0.9 SDR 0.5 SDR 0.5 SDR 0.4 SDR 0.25
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/96socc.pdf
  • $2.00 $1.90 $1.80 $1.80 $1.60 $1.58 Israel $2.40 $2.40 $2.40 $2.40 $2.40 $2.28 $2.16 $2.16 $1.90 $1.18 $1.18 Italy 5.0 GF 5.0 GF 5.0 GF 4.6 GF 4.38 GF 1.2 SDR 1.1 SDR 0.82 SDR 0.48 SDR 0.36 SDR 0.24 SDR Jamaica $1.75 $1.75 $1.75 $1.65 $1.60 $1.55 $1.50 $1.40 $1.40 $1.30 $1.25 Japan $2.351.34 SDR 1.34 SDR 1.34 SDR 1.13 SDR 0.95 SDR 0.75 SDR 0.63 SDR 0.63 SDR 0.63 SDR 0.63 SDR Korea, Rep. $2.52 $2.44 $2.36 $2.10 $1.90 $1.60 $1.440.95 SDR 0.85 SDR 0.85 SDR 0.72 SDR Mexico 3/ N/A N/A $1.45 $1.32 $1.16 $1.10 $1.00 $0.91 $0.67 $0.68 $0.70 Netherlands 1.2 SDR 1.2 SDR 1.1 SDR 1.1 SDR 0.9 SDR 0.5 SDR 0.5 SDR 0.4 SDR 0.25
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/97socc.pdf
  • 6.9 0.48 (0.16) 0.21 0.53 6.3 KY LOUISIANA 102.3 49.7 52.6 46.7 5.9 (1.59) 0.04 (1.55) 7.4 LA MAINE 23.8 6.3 17.5 13.1 4.5 0.79 0.00 0.10 0.90 3.6 ME MARYLAND 211.4 107.4 104.0 72.1 31.9 6.78 2.91 4.52 14.21 17.7 MD MASSACHUSETTS 242.7 83.6 159.1 126.0 33.1 3.94 2.83 2.70 9.48 23.6 MA MICHIGAN 295.7 232.4 63.4 46.8 16.6 (1.13) (0.59) (0.09) (1.81) 18.4 MI MINNESOTA 52.1 50.4 1.6 (2.5) 4.2 (2.47) (0.93) (0.95) (4.35) 8.5 MN MISSISSIPPI 39.2 25.8 13.4 10.1 3.3 (1.26) 0.03 0.01 (1.23) 4.5 MS MISSOURI 269.7 230.4 39.3 26.9 12.4 (0.13) (0.39) 0.12 (0.40) 12.8 MO MONTANA (1.8) 6.4 (8.1) (6.7) (1.4) (1.83) (0.80) (0.62) (3.26) 1.8 MT NEBRASKA 133.9 45.6 88.3 66.4 21.9 6.94
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/98SOCC.PDF
  • $2.00 $1.90 $1.80 $1.80 $1.60 $1.42 $1.28 $1.28 Israel $2.40 $2.40 $2.40 $2.28 $2.16 $2.16 $1.90 $1.18 $0.70 $0.59 $0.30 Italy 5.0 GF 4.6 GF 4.38 GF 1.2 SDR 1.1 SDR 0.82 SDR 0.48 SDR 0.36 SDR 0.24 SDR 0.16 SDR 0.16 SDR Jamaica $1.75 $1.65 $1.60 $1.55 $1.50 $1.40 $1.40 $1.30 $1.25 $1.25 $1.05 Japan 1.34 SDR 1.34 SDR 1.13 SDR 0.95 SDR 0.75 SDR 0.63 SDR 0.63 SDR 0.63 SDR 0.63 SDR 0.21 SDR 0.21 SDR Korea, Rep. $2.36 $2.10 $1.90 $1.60 $1.440.95 SDR 0.85 SDR 0.85 SDR 0.72 SDR $0.85 $0.71 Mexico 3/ $1.45 $1.32 $1.16 $1.10 $1.00 $0.91 $0.67 $0.68 $0.70 $0.74 $0.38 Netherlands 1.1 SDR 1.1 SDR 0.9 SDR 0.5 SDR 0.5 SDR 0.4 SDR 0.25
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/99socc.pdf
  • 7.6NH New Jersey 337.9 175.5 162.4 76.7 85.7 14.14 10.59 8.87 33.59 52.1 NJ New Mexico 52.0 37.3 14.7 10.4 4.3 (0.64) (0.11) (0.03) (0.78) 5.1NM New York 822.2 340.6 481.6 346.0 135.5 22.62 8.59 25.91 57.11 78.4NY North Carolina 448.8 336.2 112.6 82.4 30.2 3.37 0.71 0.96 5.03 25.2NC North Dakota 6.0 5.6 0.4 0.1 0.2 (0.45) (0.30) (0.38) (1.13) 1.4ND Ohio 435.8 343.4 92.4 62.9 29.5 1.71 0.58 0.66 2.95 26.5OH Oklahoma 146.1 117.8 28.2 21.0 7.3 (0.74) (0.06) 0.06 (0.75) 8.0OK Oregon 119.9 82.6 37.3 27.0 10.3 0.06 (0.50) (0.02) (0.45) 10.8OR Pennsylvania 452.6 236.5 216.1 140.6 75.5 10.64 8.41 4.99 24.04 51.5PA Rhode Island 67.1 83.8 (16.7) (19.3) 2.6 (10.71) (4.48) (0.49) (15.68) 18.3 RI South Carolina
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/prelim02socc.pdf
  • $1.28 $1.08 $0.85 $0.68 $0.46 $0.46 Israel 8/ 10/ $2.40 $2.28 $2.16 $2.16 $1.90 $1.18 $0.70 $0.59 $0.30 $0.30 $0.30 $0.30 $0.30 Italy 10/ 4.38 GF 1.2 SDR 1.1 SDR0.82 SDR0.48 SDR0.36 SDR0.24 SDR0.16 SDR0.16 SDR0.16 SDR0.16 SDR0.16 SDR 0.16 SDR Jamaica 8/ 10/ $1.60 $1.55 $1.50 $1.40 $1.40 $1.30 $1.25 $1.25 $1.05 $0.60 $0.38 $0.38 $0.38 Japan 8/ 10/ 1.13 SDR0.95 SDR0.75 SDR0.63 SDR0.63 SDR0.63 SDR0.63 SDR0.21 SDR0.21 SDR0.21 SDR0.21 SDR0.21 SDR 0.21 SDR Korea, Rep. 8/ 10/ $1.90 $1.60 $1.440.95 SDR0.85 SDR0.85 SDR0.72 SDR $0.85 $0.71 $0.51 $0.38 $0.38 $0.38 Mexico 8/ 9/ $0.75 $0.72 $0.68 $0.58 $0.53 $0.49 $0.40 $0.37 $0.19 $0.19 $0.19 $0.19 $0.19 Morocco 10/ 2.5 SDR 2.2 SDR 2.2 SDR 2.2 SDR 1.2 SDR 1.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/reports/dtvreprt.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/reports/dtvreprt.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/reports/dtvreprt.txt
  • (7) New York 18,199,417 1,466,538 586,615 310,132 (C) 150,971 0.83 Los Angeles 14,332,652 178,304 71,232 136,273 (V) 65,041 (0.45) Chicago 8,395,277 177,294 70,918 94,939 (V) 24,021 (0.29) Philadelphia 8,011,757 469,872 187,949 315,846 (V) 127,897 (1.60) Boston 6,485,082 211,469 84,588 134,438 (V) 49,850 (0.77) San Francisco 6,207,475 145,364 58,146 125,618 (V) 67,472 (1.09) Washington, D.C. 6,183,756 112,763 45,105 114,849 (V) 69,744 (1.13) Detroit 5,089,907 169,784 84,892 130,002 (V) 45,110 (0.89) Dallas/Ft. Worth 4,157,223 484,778 193,911 40,542 (C) 153,369 3.69 Atlanta 3,282,147 383,239 153,296 67,005 (C) 86,291 2.63 The above Table compares estimated COFDM service advantages in the downtown urban centers of the major markets and estimated 8-VSB advantages in the outer fringe service areas of those markets. Column (6) of the table
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/2000/da000868.doc
  • deemed acceptance of the conditions set forth herein. 20. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this authorization, issued pursuant to Section 0.261 of the Commission's Rules, is effective upon release. Petitions for reconsideration under Section 1.106 or applications for review under Section 1.115 of the Commission's Rules may be filed within 30 days of public notice of this order (see Section 1.13). FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Rebecca Arbogast Chief Telecommunications Division International Bureau 47 U.S.C. § 214. See File No. ITC-214-19990303-00103. CIC is regulated as dominant on the U.S.-Dominican Republic route. See International Authorizations Granted, Report No. TEL-00140 (rel. October 1, 1999) (Public Notice granting CIC global authorization to provide facilities-based and resale service, subject to dominant carrier regulation on the U.S.-Dominican Republic
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/2000/da001184.doc
  • deemed acceptance of the conditions set forth herein. 17. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this authorization, issued pursuant to Section 0.261 of the Commission's rules, is effective upon release. Petitions for reconsideration under Section 1.106 or applications for review under Section 1.115 of the Commission's rules may be filed within 30 days of public notice of this Order (see Section 1.13). FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Rebecca Arbogast Chief Telecommunications Division International Bureau 47 U.S.C. § 214. 47 C.F.R. § 63.18. See Wiltel International, Inc., 9 FCC Rcd 5806 (1994) (authorizing Sprint to lease and operate one E-1 circuit (30 64-Kbps circuits) and to provide all authorized services between the United States and Cuba); Sprint Communications L.P., 9 FCC Rcd 2827 (1994) (authorizing
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Public_Notices/2001/da012436.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Public_Notices/2001/da012436.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Public_Notices/2001/da012436.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Public_Notices/2001/da012436.txt
  • messenger-delivered paper filings only at our Capitol Heights facility located at 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. To accommodate this change in location, the time deadline for filing at the Capitol Heights facility is extended hereafter to 9:00 PM Eastern Time. Filings received at the Capitol Heights facility will be date-stamped. Filings made pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.13(a) should also be made at the Capitol Heights facility where they will be date and time stamped. Subpoenas directed to the Commission or its employees in their official capacities will be received only at the Capitol Heights facility. The Commission is currently looking for an alternative site in Washington, D.C., to accept delivery of filings on a more permanent basis.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
  • > 24 Hours 25.77 NA 18.83 0 21.65 0 28.76 0 23.04 0 b,c,d,e MR-5 - Repeat Trouble Reports MR-5-01-3550 % Repeat Reports within 30 Days 15.94 NA 14.64 0 13.37 0 13.86 25 13.56 0 b,c,d,e Maintenance - POTS Platform MR-2 - Trouble Report Rate MR-2-02-3140 Network Trouble Report Rate ­ Platform 0.92 0.5 0.77 0.64 0.57 1.11 0.67 1.13 0.58 0.18 MR-2-03-3140 Network Trouble Report Rate ­ Central Office 0.14 0.17 0.06 0 0.04 0 0.05 0.19 0.06 0 MR-2-04-3140 % Subsequent Reports 11.59 20 10.31 0 11.71 0 22.22 0 a,b,c,e MR-2-05-3140 % CPE/TOK/FOK Trouble Report Rate 0.82 0.66 0.65 0.32 0.51 0.16 0.57 0.54 MR-3 - Missed Repair Appointments MR-3-01-3144 % Missed Repair Appointment ­ Platform Bus.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2000/dd000301.html
  • Adopted: February 29, 2000. by Policy Statement. (FCC No. 00-72). ENF Internet URL: [30]http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Enforcement/Orders/2000/fcc00072.doc IMPLEMENTATION OF SECTION 309(J) --COMPETITIVE BIDDING FOR COMMERCIAL BROADCAST AND ITFS LICENSES. Denied petition for reconsideration and request for clarification filed by Snyder Hill Broadcasting, Inc. Action by Chief, Mass Media Bureau. Adopted: February 28, 2000. by MO&O. (DA No. 00-445). MMB Internet URL: [31]http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/da000445.doc SECTION 1.13 OF RULES. Amended rules to reflect the FCC's change of address. Action by Chief, Office of Managing Director. Adopted: February 29, 2000. by Order. (DA No. 00-447). OMD SUNSHINE CELLULAR. Dismissed as moot Pennsylvania Cellular Telephone Corp. and Harrisburg Cellular Telephone company's petiions. Action by Chief, Policy and Rules Branch. Adopted: February 29, 2000. by Order. (DA No. 00-460). WTB
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2006/dd060126.html
  • INC. AND TIME WARNER ENTERTAINMENT-ADVANCE/NEWHOUSE PARTNERSHIP, D/B/A TIME WARNER CABLE. Granted the petition for a determination of effective competition filed by Alert Cable TV of South Carolina, Inc. and Time Warner Entertainment Advance/Newhouse Partnership. Action by: Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau. Adopted: 01/25/2006 by MO&O. (DA No. 06-78). MB [25]DA-06-78A1.doc [26]DA-06-78A1.pdf [27]DA-06-78A1.txt IN THE MATTER OF AMENDMENT OF SECTION 1.13 OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES. Amended to eliminate an inconsistency with the Federal Rules that arose as a result of the 2002 amendments to the Federal Rules. Action by: The Commission. Adopted: 01/24/2006 by ORDER. (FCC No. 06-6). OGC [28]FCC-06-6A1.doc [29]FCC-06-6A1.pdf [30]FCC-06-6A1.txt FM BROADCAST AUCTION NO. 62 - SHORT-FORM APPLICATIONS OF AURORA COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND LOTUS COMMUNICATIONS CORP. Found an apparent
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2003budget.html?page=26
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2003budget.html?page=26&contrast=
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2003budget.html?page=26&contrast=highContrast
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2003budget.html?page=26&fontsize=
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2003budget.html?page=26&fontsize=largeFont
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2003budget.html?page=26&fontsize=mediumFont
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2004budget.html?page=26
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2004budget.html?page=26&contrast=
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2004budget.html?page=26&contrast=highContrast
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2004budget.html?page=26&fontsize=
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2004budget.html?page=26&fontsize=largeFont
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2004budget.html?page=26&fontsize=mediumFont
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2005budget.html?page=26
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2005budget.html?page=26&contrast=
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2005budget.html?page=26&contrast=highContrast
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2005budget.html?page=26&fontsize=
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2005budget.html?page=26&fontsize=largeFont
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2005budget.html?page=26&fontsize=mediumFont
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2006budget.html?page=26
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2006budget.html?page=26&contrast=
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2006budget.html?page=26&contrast=highContrast
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2006budget.html?page=26&fontsize=
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2006budget.html?page=26&fontsize=largeFont
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2006budget.html?page=26&fontsize=mediumFont
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2007budget.html?page=26
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2007budget.html?page=26&contrast=
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2007budget.html?page=26&contrast=highContrast
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2007budget.html?page=26&fontsize=
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2007budget.html?page=26&fontsize=largeFont
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2007budget.html?page=26&fontsize=mediumFont
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2008budget.html?page=26
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2008budget.html?page=26&contrast=
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2008budget.html?page=26&contrast=highContrast
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2008budget.html?page=26&fontsize=
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2008budget.html?page=26&fontsize=largeFont
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2008budget.html?page=26&fontsize=mediumFont
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2009budget.html?page=26
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2009budget.html?page=26&contrast=
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2009budget.html?page=26&contrast=highContrast
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2009budget.html?page=26&fontsize=
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2009budget.html?page=26&fontsize=largeFont
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2009budget.html?page=26&fontsize=mediumFont
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc21.html?page=26
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc21.html?page=26&contrast=
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc21.html?page=26&contrast=highContrast
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc21.html?page=26&fontsize=
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc21.html?page=26&fontsize=largeFont
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc21.html?page=26&fontsize=mediumFont
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc_reform_091301.html?page=26
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc_reform_091301.html?page=26&contrast=
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc_reform_091301.html?page=26&contrast=highContrast
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc_reform_091301.html?page=26&fontsize=
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc_reform_091301.html?page=26&fontsize=largeFont
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc_reform_091301.html?page=26&fontsize=mediumFont
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fccbudget.html?page=26
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fccbudget.html?page=26&contrast=
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fccbudget.html?page=26&contrast=highContrast
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fccbudget.html?page=26&fontsize=
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fccbudget.html?page=26&fontsize=largeFont
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/fccbudget.html?page=26&fontsize=mediumFont
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/imp_rpt.html?page=26
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/imp_rpt.html?page=26&contrast=
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/imp_rpt.html?page=26&contrast=highContrast
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/imp_rpt.html?page=26&fontsize=
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/imp_rpt.html?page=26&fontsize=largeFont
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/imp_rpt.html?page=26&fontsize=mediumFont
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/performance1999.html?page=26
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/performance1999.html?page=26&contrast=
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/performance1999.html?page=26&contrast=highContrast
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/performance1999.html?page=26&fontsize=
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/performance1999.html?page=26&fontsize=largeFont
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/performance1999.html?page=26&fontsize=mediumFont
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/reh71896.html?page=26
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/reh71896.html?page=26&contrast=
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/reh71896.html?page=26&contrast=highContrast
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/reh71896.html?page=26&fontsize=
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/reh71896.html?page=26&fontsize=largeFont
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/reh71896.html?page=26&fontsize=mediumFont
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/stplan97.html?page=26
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/stplan97.html?page=26&contrast=
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/stplan97.html?page=26&contrast=highContrast
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/stplan97.html?page=26&fontsize=
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/stplan97.html?page=26&fontsize=largeFont
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/stplan97.html?page=26&fontsize=mediumFont
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/tfr_rel.html?page=26
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/tfr_rel.html?page=26&contrast=
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/tfr_rel.html?page=26&contrast=highContrast
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/tfr_rel.html?page=26&fontsize=
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/tfr_rel.html?page=26&fontsize=largeFont
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/Reports/tfr_rel.html?page=26&fontsize=mediumFont
  • [_] Video Competition Reports Apply Filter * [79]Trends in Telephony Service (1998- 2nd Report) 07.01.1998 Trends in Telephone Service is published by the Industry Analysis Division of the Common... * [80]Commercial Mobile Radio Services (CMRS) Competition Report (3rd Annual) 04.24.1998 Mobile wireless competition reports contain data and information that the FCC uses to analyze... * [81]4th Annual Video Competition Report 01.13.1998 This is the Commission's fourth annual report ("1997 Report") to Congress submitted ... * [82]Telephone Subscribership Report (through November 1997) 01.01.1998 The number and percentage of households that have telephone service represent the most basic... * [83]Telephone Penetration Report (through 1997) 01.01.1998 This report presents data on telephone penetration levels by state for various income ... * [84]Report on Cable
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-250390A1.html
  • 73482, Chicago, Illinois 60673-7482. The payment must include the FCC Registration Number (FRN) and the NAL/Acct. No. referenced in the caption. 1.12. The response, if any, must be mailed to Federal Communications Commission, Enforcement Bureau, Western Region, San Diego Office, 4542 Ruffner Street - Suite 370, San Diego, California 92111 and must include the NAL/Acct. No. referenced in the caption. 1.13. The Commission will not consider reducing or canceling a forfeiture in response to a claim of inability to pay unless the petitioner submits: (1) federal tax returns for the most recent three-year period; (2) financial statements prepared according to generally accepted accounting practices (``GAAP''); or (3) some other reliable and objective documentation that accurately reflects the petitioner's current financial status.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-256120A1.html
  • financial status. Any claim of inability to pay must specifically identify the basis for the claim by reference to the financial documentation submitted. 1.12. Requests for payment of the full amount of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief, Revenue and Receivable Operation Group, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554.15 1.13. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be sent, by Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested, and regular mail, to Alpine Broadcasting Limited Partnership, PO Box 2158, Ketchum, ID 83340-2158. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Steven Houser Acting District Director Seattle District Office Western Region Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 1On June 21, 2004, the Commission accepted Alpine's application
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-256485A1.html
  • or money order may be mailed to Forfeiture Collection Section, Finance Branch, Federal Communications Commission, P.O. Box 73482, Chicago, Illinois 60673-7482. Payment by overnight mail may be sent to Bank One/LB 73482, 525 West Monroe, 8th Floor Mailroom, Chicago, IL 60661. Payment by wire transfer may be made to ABA Number 071000013, receiving bank Bank One, and account number 1165259. 1.13. The response, if any, must be mailed to Federal Communications Commission, Enforcement Bureau, Western Region, San Diego Office, 4542 Ruffner Street - Suite 370, San Diego, California 92111 and must include the NAL/Acct. No. referenced in the caption. 1.14. The Commission will not consider reducing or canceling a forfeiture in response to a claim of inability to pay unless the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-260117A1.html
  • the Commission's Rules.13 1.12. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT, pursuant to Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules, within thirty days of the release date of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, Farmworkers Educational Radio Network Inc., SHALL PAY the full amount of the proposed forfeiture or SHALL FILE a written statement seeking reduction or cancellation of the proposed forfeiture. 1.13. Payment of the forfeiture must be made by check or similar instrument, payable to the order of the Federal Communications Commission. The payment must include the NAL/Acct. No. and FRN No. referenced above. Payment by check or money order may be mailed to Federal Communications Commission, P.O. Box 358340, Pittsburgh, PA 15251-8340. Payment by overnight mail may be sent to
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-262295A1.html
  • of the violation, and with respect to the violator, the degree of culpability, and any history of prior offenses, ability to pay, and other such matters as justice may require.''16 Applying the Forfeiture Policy Statement, Section 1.80 and the statutory factors, we conclude that the Petersons are apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $8,000. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES 1.13. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Sections 0.111, 0.311 and 1.80 of the Commission's Rules, Richard A. & Joann R. Peterson, Joint Tenants, are hereby NOTIFIED of their APPARENT LIABILITY FOR A FORFEITURE in the amount of eight thousand dollars ($8,000) for violating Section 11.35 of the Commission's
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-263779A1.html
  • violation, and with respect to the violator, the degree of culpability, and any history of prior offenses, ability to pay, and other such matters as justice may require.''12 Applying the Forfeiture Policy Statement, Section 1.80 and the statutory factors, we conclude that the KPAL Television Inc., is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $8,000. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES 1.13. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Sections 0.111, 0.311 and 1.80 of the Commission's Rules, KPAL Television Inc., is hereby NOTIFIED of its APPARENT LIABILITY FOR A FORFEITURE in the amount of eight thousand dollars ($8,000) for violating Section 11.35(a) of the Commission's Rules.13 1.14. IT IS FURTHER
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/FCC-03-163A1.html
  • expiration of the three year term, AT&T could charge Ryder an early service termination fee in ``an amount equal to 100% of the unsatisfied MARC for each year remaining in the Custom Offer Agreement term.''12 Ryder further agreed with AT&T that the early service termination provision in the parties' contract would supercede the early service termination provision in Tariff No. 1.13 In addition, the parties agreed to incorporate the limitation of liability provisions in Tariff No. 1,14 under which AT&T remained liable for damages caused by any willful misconduct in its provision of tariffed services.15 5. AT&T filed the parties' contract with the Commission as Contract Tariff No. 6831 (``CT 6831'').16 CT 6831 became effective on April 15, 1997.17 6. In
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-92A1.html
  • C.F.R. S 54.521(e)(1); Second Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 9226, P 69. 47 C.F.R. SS 54.521(e)(3), 54.521(e)(4). 47 C.F.R. S 54.521(e)(5). Our rule states that notice of debarment will be provided within 90 days of receipt of information submitted by the respondent in response to a suspension notice. We may waive our own rule pursuant to 47 C.F.R. S 1.13 in the public interest. To allow the Commission to have a full opportunity to analyze this matter, we hereby waive the 90 day rule, as it applies to Inter-Tel's responsive pleading, filed February 22, 2005. 47 C.F.R. S 54.521(g). Letter from Maureen F. Del Duca, Chief, Investigations and Hearings Division, Enforcement Bureau, to Oscar Alvarez, Connect2 Internet Network, Inc., DA
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-06-177A1.html
  • (Mar. 22, 2006). Our rules contemplate that notice of debarment will be provided within 90 days of receipt of information submitted by the respondent in response to a suspension notice. 47 C.F.R. S 54.521(e)(5). Premio filed its Petition on March 27, 2006; 90 days thereafter was June 27, 2006. We may waive our own rules pursuant to 47 C.F.R. S 1.13 in the public interest. To allow the Commission to have a full opportunity to analyze this matter, we hereby waive the 90 day rule as it applies to Premio, Inc.'s responsive pleading, filed March 27, 2006. NextiraOne, LLC, Notice of Debarment and Order Denying Waiver Petition, FCC 06-126 (rel. Jan. 22, 2007). See Letter from W. Kenneth Ferree, Esq. and
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-2A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-2A1.pdf
  • (1.48) Number of AM stations in contour -0.002 (0.97) -0.002 (0.89) -0.002 (0.84) Number of FM stations in market 0.000 (0.37) 0.000 (0.32) 0.000 (0.38) Number of FM stations in contour -0.002 (1.59) -0.002 (1.56) -0.002 (1.51) Number of commercial TV stations -0.001 (0.24) -0.001 (0.34) -0.000 (0.10) Number of digital radio stations in market 0.000 (0.86) 0.000 (0.71) 0.000 (1.13) Number of newspapers in market 0.003 (0.62) 0.003 (0.61) 0.003 (0.61) Population 18+ in market -0.000 (0.37) -0.000 (0.39) -0.000 (0.26) Retail expenditures in market -0.000 (0.40) -0.000 (0.46) -0.000 (0.20) Per capita income in market -0.000 (0.74) -0.000 (0.64) -0.000 (0.81) Constant -0.013 (5.81)** -0.013 (5.92)** -0.012 (5.57)** * - estimated regression coefficient is different from zero at the
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/pd/pf/TABALL02.pdf
  • 19,547 6,570 31,841 42,929 0.22 0.11 0.09 0.24 7 18 15 15 15Taiwan 2,201 27,413 1 29,615 14,811 0.08 0.06 0.12 0.29 1 19 14 11 8France 13,738 5,778 7,561 27,077 6,581 1.03 0.38 0.29 0.51 7 20 19 26 20India 3,529 23,029 0 26,558 3,121 0.15 0.18 0.40 0.46 7 21 20 20 19Philippines 10,642 8,814 634 20,090 10,754 1.13 1.16 1.11 1.59 6 22 23 21 24Colombia 4,008 6,851 5,220 16,079 2,911 0.33 0.32 0.31 0.58 6 23 22 23 21Venezuela 3,086 5,886 3,717 12,689 20,365 0.32 0.22 0.38 0.70 8 24 21 22 n.a.New Zealand 2,630 3,912 4,095 10,637 2,136 0.33 0.19 0.13 1.63 4 25 n.a. n.a. 27Dominican Republic 3,266 1,643 4,032 8,941 5,846 0.58 2.14 2.15
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/agree/files/mex-bc/am.pdf
  • provide coverage over ooe or more population centers and the contiguous rural areas located Ln Fts primary service area and which is protected against objectionable interfereace, accordingly. 1.12 Class C station A station intended to provide coverageover a city or tom and the contiguous suburban areas located in its primary service area and which is protected against objectionable interference, accordingly. 1.13 Daytime operatioa . Operatioa betueen the times of local sunrise and local sunset. I.14 Nighttime operation Operation between the times of local sunset and local sunrise. 1.15 Synchronized network Tvo ormore broadcas tiug statloas whose carrier frequencies are Meatteal and uhfch broadcast the same program simultaneously. In a synchronized aetvork the difference in carrier frequency betveen say two traasmttters in
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files/ITRND01.pdf
  • 1.61 1967 39.7 114.2 54.6 59.6 23.4 31.8 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46.4 126.9 61.5 65.4 28.2 40.0 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 64.6 172.0 82.7 89.4 38.3 51.6 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81.1 196.6 98.9 97.7 51.0 59.8 2.43 1.22 1.21 1.17 1.19 1971 100.9 237.4 120.7 116.6 68.4 75.1 2.35 1.20 1.16 1.10 1.13 1972 126.5 291.8 148.2 143.6 91.7 98.6 2.31 1.17 1.14 1.08 1.11 1973 159.3 364.9 184.4 180.5 111.5 120.2 2.29 1.16 1.13 1.08 1.11 1974 190.7 428.7 216.6 212.1 142.0 152.2 2.25 1.14 1.11 1.07 1.09 1975 219.4 490.2 247.4 242.9 167.0 176.9 2.23 1.13 1.11 1.06 1.09 1976 272.7 601.1 303.0 298.1 197.2 207.2 2.20 1.11 1.09 1.05 1.08
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/wrc-03/files/docs/meeting/iwg/iwg_4/11thMtgMinutes.pdf
  • Date/Time: March 8, 2002@ 9:40 AM Location: Federal Communications Commission Committee Members Present: J. Wengryniuk, Chairperson W. Rummler, Vice Chairperson FCC Employees Present: Ed Jacobs, Ron Netro Meeting Summary The minutes of the February 12th meeting (10th Meeting of IWG-4, Document IWG-4/24 were approved without change. No new documents were introduced. Mr. Wengryniuk summarized the status of the agenda items 1.13, 1.18, 1.25, 1.26, and 1.32 as follows: · Agenda Item 1.13: there are currently three documents (document 19 from Mr. Wengryniuk, and documents 22 and 23 from Skytower) addressing this agenda item. None of these documents were discussed at the meeting. At this point in time all concerns and issues regarding these documents are still open and IWG-4 will address
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/wrc-03/files/docs/meeting/iwg/iwg_4/wrc03_iwg4_1st_draftminutes.pdf
  • by March 16. The goal is to further develop these draft documents by correspondence in time for the next meeting of IWG-4 on April 11. To facilitate the work of the IWG-4, Giselle Creeser volunteered to provide the group with the text that was developed in the U.S. preparations for WRC-2000 for the 18 ­ 32 GHz portion of A.I. 1.13. Kathryn Medley agreed to provide the distribution list with the preliminary views of the RCS. Before closing the meeting, the Chairman noted that the formats for IWG documents could be found on the FCC web site. He also indicated that he would provide an E-mail membership list to all members of IWG-4 by the end of the week. Documents Distributed:
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/wrc-03/files/docs/meeting/iwg/iwg_4/wrc03_iwg4_draft_minutes_5_30_02.pdf
  • Approval of Minutes of last meeting: Minutes approved without change. 2. Discussion of Draft Proposals Four documents were presented at this meeting, Documents IWG-4/28 Rev. 1, 30 Rev. 1, 31 and 32. The following is a summary of the specific topics raised in discussing these documents and their disposition. 2.1 IWG-4/32 - High Altitude Platform Stations - WRC-03 Agenda item 1.13 A new contribution was introduced, which represents a cooperative effort among the authors of previous contributions on this agenda item and, therefore, replaces documents IWG-4/19, 22, 23 and 26. This document outlines a proposal to identify a specific 300 MHz band for use by HAPS systems and specifies limits for aggregate interference from HAPS to other services. Because of the
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/wrc-03/files/docs/meeting/iwg/iwg_4/wrc03_iwg4_draft_minutes_6_27_02.pdf
  • phone, introduced themselves (See Attachment 1) Approval of the Agenda: The Agenda, attached hereto as Attachment 2, was approved without comment. Approval of Minutes of June 20th, 2002 meeting (doc. IWG-2/033): The minutes were Approved without comment. Consideration of Potential New IWG-2 Draft WRC-03 Proposals: Document IWG-4/32 from Sky Tower and Intelsat regarding a Draft U.S. Proposal on Agenda Item 1.13 (HAPS) and Resolution 122 was discussed extensively. The following issues were raised in connection with this document; 1. Should there be a feeder link only restriction for HAPS at 47 GHz? 2. Should the current ITU freeze on processing of new FSS filings in the 47 Ghz HAPS allocations be lifted? 3. The resolves in Resolution ABC need further work.
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/wrc-03/files/docs/meeting/iwg/iwg_4/wrc03_iwg4_draft_minutes_7_30_02.pdf
  • Netro, Scott Kotler Introduction of Participants: Participants, including several participating by phone, introduced themselves (See Attachment 1) Approval of the Agenda: No written agenda was provided. Approval of Minutes of June 27th, 2002 meeting (doc. IWG-4/035): The minutes were approved without comment. Consideration of Potential New IWG-4 Draft WRC-03 Proposals: Several documents concerning a draft U.S. proposal on agenda item 1.13 (HAPS) and Resolution 122 were discussed extensively. The following documents were presented and discussed: 2 Document No. Title Source IWG-4/19 (rev.1) Draft U.S. Proposal on WRC-03 Agenda Item 1.13 Wengryniuk (Hughes Network Systems) IWG-4/32 Draft U.S. Proposal on WRC-03 Agenda Item 1.13 Gould for SkyTower IWG-4/36 Contribution of SkyTower Gould for SkyTower IWG-4/37 Draft Proposal on WRC-03 Agenda Item 1.13
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/wrc-03/files/docs/meeting/iwg/iwg_4/wrc03_iwg_4_documents_list.pdf
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Doc. IWG-4/000 February 11, 2002 FCC WRC-03 Advisory Committee Informal Working Group 4 List of Documents Doc. # Status Title/Issue Author Date IWG-4/001 Approved Terms of Reference Chair IWG-4 2/27/01 IWG-4/002 Approved Meeting Minutes from 1st Meeting of IWG-4 W. Rummler 4/11/01 IWG-4/003 Approved IWG-4 Preliminary Views on Agenda Item 1.13 (HAPS) G. Creeser 4/11/01 IWG-4/004 Approved IWG-4 Preliminary Views on Agenda Item 1.25 (HDFSS) T. Hayden 4/12/01 IWG-4/005 Approved IWG-4 Preliminary Views on Agenda Item 1.26 (ESVs) D. Jansky 4/12/01 IWG-4/006 Approved IWG-4 Preliminary Views on Agenda Item 1.32a (V-Band and RA) G. deDios 4/11/01 IWG-4/007 Approved IWG-4 Preliminary Views on Agenda Item 1.32b (V-Band and HDFS/FSS Sharing) G. deDios
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/wrc-03/files/docs/meeting/iwg/iwg_4/wrc03_iwg_4_minutes_12_11_01.pdf
  • proposed modification of Resolution 82. The meeting agreed to remove the square brackets and text from the last part of Annex 2, and to change a reference. With the modifications noted, the meeting approved the draft proposals on Agenda Item 1.26. The third document to be taken up was Document IWG-4/019, a new draft set of proposals on Agenda Item 1.13 from the Chairperson of IWG-4. Mr. Wengryniuk introduced the document, and an extended discussion followed. The meeting decided to table the document, noting that it was not urgent that the document be part of the set of U.S. proposals that is under development for the February 2002 meeting of CITEL PCC.III. The meeting did further note, however, that activities on
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/wrc-03/files/docs/meeting/iwg/iwg_4/wrc03_iwg_4_minutes_1_16_02.pdf
  • of the ship is required. This requirement is not acceptable to the US Navy. Discussions are underway between the FCC and NTIA on both of these issues to achieve a consensus position. It was pointed out that there may not be an agreement in time for the February CITEL meeting. Documents submitted to the meeting were based on Agenda Item 1.13 (HAPS). Regarding document 22 from Skytower on Res 122, various editorials were raised by the Chairman. Mr. Doiron raised concern about considering (t) in that the studies do not demonstrate the protection of the FSS. Comments were also made in regards to requests ITU-R(3). A general discussion took place in regards to the intention of the USA on this issue.
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/wrc-03/files/docs/meeting/iwg/iwg_4/wrc03_iwg_4_minutes_8_7_01.pdf
  • Committee Members Present: See Annex 1 FCC Employees Present: A. Roytblat Minutes from the June 21 Meeting: The minutes from the previous meeting were distributed and the Chairperson requested comments by e-mail by CoB of August 8 for any requested modifications. SkyTower Submission: Earl Cox of SkyTower presented a paper proposing changes to the U.S. Preliminary View on Agenda Item 1.13 (see Annex 2). Ms. Creeser pointed out that the U.S. view must include comments on the specific frequency bands identified in Resolution 734. She also pointed out that it was the U.S. that proposed that HAPS be defined as within a specific ITU-R service. Mr. Jansky suggested to the SkyTower representatives that the appropriate action to achieve their aim would
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/wrc-03/files/docs/meeting/iwg/iwg_4/wrc03_iwg_4_minutes_april_11_01.pdf
  • the 2/27 meeting which were posted on the FCC's web site on 4/9 were approved. The list of attendees at the first meeting was corrected. The Terms of Reference, which were modified subsequent to the 2/27 meeting to include a reference to Resolution 84 in item #5, were approved. Giselle Creeser, participating by phone, introduced document 003 re: agenda item 1.13. It was approved with minor modifications, including a statement that the U.S. will follow the work in the ITU regarding the use of HAPS for fixed and mobile services above 3 GHz. Tom Hayden introduced document 004 re: agenda item 1.25. Tom proposed a restructuring of the order of paragraphs, which was accepted. It was suggested that the paper focus
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/wrc-03/files/docs/meeting/iwg/iwg_4/wrc03_iwg_4_tor_doc_1.pdf
  • GHz and 47.9-48.2 GHz by High Altitude Platform Stations (HAPS) in the Fixed Service and by other Services and the Potential Use of Bands in the Range 18-32 GHz by HAPS in the Fixed Service" and "Feasibility of use by HAPS in the Fixed and Mobile Services in the Frequency Bands Above 3 GHz Allocated Exclusively for Terrestrial Radiocommunication;" (A.I. 1.13) (2) consideration of a primary allocation to the fixed service in the band 17.3- 17.7 GHz for Region 1, taking into account the primary allocations to various services in all three Regions; (A.I. 1.18) (3) consideration of regulatory provisions and possible identification of spectrum for high density systems in the fixed-satellite service above 17.3 GHz; (A.I. 1.25) (4) consideration of
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/peer_review/prlpfm_rpt_economic_study.pdf
  • (1.48) Number of AM stations in contour -0.002 (0.97) -0.002 (0.89) -0.002 (0.84) Number of FM stations in market 0.000 (0.37) 0.000 (0.32) 0.000 (0.38) Number of FM stations in contour -0.002 (1.59) -0.002 (1.56) -0.002 (1.51) Number of commercial TV stations -0.001 (0.24) -0.001 (0.34) -0.000 (0.10) Number of digital radio stations in market 0.000 (0.86) 0.000 (0.71) 0.000 (1.13) Number of newspapers in market 0.003 (0.62) 0.003 (0.61) 0.003 (0.61) Population 18+ in market -0.000 (0.37) -0.000 (0.39) -0.000 (0.26) Retail expenditures in market -0.000 (0.40) -0.000 (0.46) -0.000 (0.20) Per capita income in market -0.000 (0.74) -0.000 (0.64) -0.000 (0.81) Constant -0.013 (5.81)** -0.013 (5.92)** -0.012 (5.57)** * -estimated regression coefficient is different from zero at the 95
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-broadband-dead-zone-report.pdf
  • 1.12 Will this information system derive new information, records, or data, or create previously unavailable information, records, or data, through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected via this link to the other system, including information, records, or data, that is being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.13 Can the information, whether it is: (a) in the information system, (b) in a linked information system, and/or (c) transferred from another system, be retrieved by a name or a "unique identifier" linked to an individual, e.g., SSN, name, home telephone number, fingerprint, voice print, etc.? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.14 Will the new information include personal information
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-ccd.pdf
  • 1.12 Will this information system derive new information, records, or data, or create previously unavailable information, records, or data, through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected via this link to the other system, including information, records, or data, that is being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.13 Can the information, whether it is: (a) in the information system, (b) in a linked information system, and/or (c) transferred from another system, be retrieved by a name or a "unique identifier" linked to an individual, e.g., SSN, name, home telephone number, fingerprint, voice print, etc.? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.14 Will the new information include personal information
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-core-financial.pdf
  • 1.12 Will this information system derive new information, records, or data, or create previously unavailable information, records, or data, through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected via this link to the other system, including information, records, or data, that is being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.13 Can the information, whether it is: (a) in the information system, (b) in a linked information system, and/or (c) transferred from another system, be retrieved by a name or a "unique identifier" linked to an individual, e.g., SSN, name, home telephone number, fingerprint, voice print, etc.? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.14 Will the new information include personal information
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-criminal-investigative-files.pdf
  • the other system, including information, records, or data, that is being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: This information system does not create or derive new information, and the information within OIG's Criminal Investigative Files information system will not be electronically obtained from nor linked to other FCC or non-FCC information systems. 1.13 Can the information, whether it is: (a) in the information system, (b) in a linked information system, and/or (c) transferred from another system, be retrieved by a name or a "unique identifier" linked to an individual, e.g., SSN, name, home telephone number, fingerprint, voice print, etc.? Yes No Please explain your response: As noted in Question 1.12, the information in
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-crisis.pdf
  • 1.12 Will this information system derive new information, records, or data, or create previously unavailable information, records, or data, through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected via this link to the other system, including information, records, or data, that is being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.13 Can the information, whether it is: (a) in the information system, (b) in a linked information system, and/or (c) transferred from another system, be retrieved by a name or a "unique identifier" linked to an individual, e.g., SSN, name, home telephone number, fingerprint, voice print, etc.? Yes No Please explain your response: Individual's first and last names, telephone number(s), and
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-dqc.pdf
  • 1.12 Will this information system derive new information, records, or data, or create previously unavailable information, records, or data, through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected via this link to the other system, including information, records, or data, that is being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.13 Can the information, whether it is: (a) in the information system, (b) in a linked information system, and/or (c) transferred from another system, be retrieved by a name or a "unique identifier" linked to an individual, e.g., SSN, name, home telephone number, fingerprint, voice print, etc.? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.14 Will the new information include personal information
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-ecfs.pdf
  • 1.12 Will this information system derive new information, records, or data, or create previously unavailable information, records, or data, through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected via this link to the other system, including information, records, or data, that is being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.13 Can the information, whether it is: (a) in the information system, (b) in a linked information system, and/or (c) transferred from another system, be retrieved by a name or a "unique identifier" linked to an individual, e.g., SSN, name, home telephone number, fingerprint, voice print, etc.? Yes No Please explain your response: 10 1.14 Will the new information include personal
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-email.pdf
  • 1.12 Will this information system derive new information, records, or data, or create previously unavailable information, records, or data, through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected via this link to the other system, including information, records, or data, that is being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.13 Can the information, whether it is: (a) in the information system, (b) in a linked information system, and/or (c) transferred from another system, be retrieved by a name or a "unique identifier" linked to an individual, e.g., SSN, name, home telephone number, fingerprint, voice print, etc.? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.14 Will the new information include personal information
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-experimental-radio.pdf
  • 1.12 Will this information system derive new information, records, or data, or create previously unavailable information, records, or data, through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected via this link to the other system, including information, records, or data, that is being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.13 Can the information, whether it is: (a) in the information system, (b) in a linked information system, and/or (c) transferred from another system, be retrieved by a name or a "unique identifier" linked to an individual, e.g., SSN, name, home telephone number, fingerprint, voice print, etc.? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.14 Will the new information include personal information
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-faca.pdf
  • 1.12 Will this information system derive new information, records, or data, or create previously unavailable information, records, or data, through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected via this link to the other system, including information, records, or data, that is being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.13 Can the information, whether it is: (a) in the information system, (b) in a linked information system, and/or (c) transferred from another system, be retrieved by a name or a "unique identifier" linked to an individual, e.g., SSN, name, home telephone number, fingerprint, voice print, etc.? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.14 Will the new information include personal information
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-financial.pdf
  • 1.12 Will this information system derive new information, records, or data, or create previously unavailable information, records, or data, through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected via this link to the other system, including information, records, or data, that is being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.13 Can the information, whether it is: (a) in the information system, (b) in a linked information system, and/or (c) transferred from another system, be retrieved by a name or a "unique identifier" linked to an individual, e.g., SSN, name, home telephone number, fingerprint, voice print, etc.? Yes No Please explain your response: The FCC can retrieve PII about individuals, companies,
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-foia.pdf
  • 1.12 Will this information system derive new information, records, or data, or create previously unavailable information, records, or data, through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected via this link to the other system, including information, records, or data, that is being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.13 Can the information, whether it is: (a) in the information system, (b) in a linked information system, and/or (c) transferred from another system, be retrieved by a name or a "unique identifier" linked to an individual, e.g., SSN, name, home telephone number, fingerprint, voice print, etc.? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.14 Will the new information include personal information
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-general-investigative-files.pdf
  • link to the other system, including information, records, or data, that is being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: This information system does not create or derive new information, and the information within OIG's General Investive Files information system will not be electronically obtained from other FCC or non-FCC information systems. 10 1.13 Can the information, whether it is: (a) in the information system, (b) in a linked information system, and/or (c) transferred from another system, be retrieved by a name or a "unique identifier" linked to an individual, e.g., SSN, name, home telephone number, fingerprint, voice print, etc.? Yes No Please explain your response: As noted in Question 1.12, the information in
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-ils.pdf
  • 1.12 Will this information system derive new information, records, or data, or create previously unavailable information, records, or data, through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected via this link to the other system, including information, records, or data, that is being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.13 Can the information, whether it is: (a) in the information system, (b) in a linked information system, and/or (c) transferred from another system, be retrieved by a name or a "unique identifier" linked to an individual, e.g., SSN, name, home telephone number, fingerprint, voice print, etc.? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.14 Will the new information include personal information
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-investigations-hearings.pdf
  • 1.12 Will this information system derive new information, records, or data, or create previously unavailable information, records, or data, through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected via this link to the other system, including information, records, or data, that is being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.13 Can the information, whether it is: (a) in the information system, (b) in a linked information system, and/or (c) transferred from another system, be retrieved by a name or a "unique identifier" linked to an individual, e.g., SSN, name, home telephone number, fingerprint, voice print, etc.? Yes No Please explain your response: 10 1.14 Will the new information include personal
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-labor-employee-relations.pdf
  • 1.12 Will this information system derive new information, records, or data, or create previously unavailable information, records, or data, through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected via this link to the other system, including information, records, or data, that is being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.13 Can the information, whether it is: (a) in the information system, (b) in a linked information system, and/or (c) transferred from another system, be retrieved by a name or a "unique identifier" linked to an individual, e.g., SSN, name, home telephone number, fingerprint, voice print, etc.? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.14 Will the new information include personal information
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-lmts.pdf
  • 1.12 Will this information system derive new information, records, or data, or create previously unavailable information, records, or data, through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected via this link to the other system, including information, records, or data, that are being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.13 Can the information, whether it is: (a) in the information system, (b) in a linked information system, and/or (c) transferred from another system, be retrieved by a name or a "unique identifier" linked to an individual, i.e., SSN, name, home telephone number, fingerprint, voice print, etc.? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.14 Will the new information include personal information
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-pams.pdf
  • 1.12 Will this information system derive new information, records, or data, or create previously unavailable information, records, or data, through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected via this link to the other system, including information, records, or data, that is being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.13 Can the information, whether it is: (a) in the information system, (b) in a linked information system, and/or (c) transferred from another system, be retrieved by a name or a "unique identifier" linked to an individual, e.g., SSN, name, home telephone number, fingerprint, voice print, etc.? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.14 Will the new information include personal information
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-pay-leave-garnish.pdf
  • Will this information system derive new information, records, or data, or create previously unavailable information, records, or data, through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected via this link to the other system, including information, records, or data, that is being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: 10 1.13 Can the information, whether it is: (a) in the information system, (b) in a linked information system, and/or (c) transferred from another system, be retrieved by a name or a "unique identifier" linked to an individual, e.g., SSN, name, home telephone number, fingerprint, voice print, etc.? Yes No Please explain your response: The Pay, Leave, and Garnishment Records information system
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-personal-security-files.pdf
  • be collected via this link to the other system, including information, records, or data, that are being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: The information covered by FCC/OMD-16, "Personal Security Files," SORN is intended to create a personal background file on each FCC employee as required by Federal employment and security regulations. 1.13 Can the information, whether it is: (a) in the information system, (b) in a linked information system, and/or (c) transferred from another system, be retrieved by a name or a "unique identifier" linked to an individual, i.e., SSN, name, home telephone number, fingerprint, voice print, etc.? Yes No Please explain your response: As noted in Question 1.8, the Personal Security
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-physical-access.pdf
  • 1.12 Will this information system derive new information, records, or data, or create previously unavailable information, records, or data, through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected via this link to the other system, including information, records, or data, that are being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.13 Can the information, whether it is: (a) in the information system, (b) in a linked information system, and/or (c) transferred from another system, be retrieved by a name or a "unique identifier" linked to an individual, e.g., SSN, name, home telephone number, fingerprint, voice print, etc.? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.14 Will the new information include personal information
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-reasonable-accommodation-requests.pdf
  • 1.12 Will this information system derive new information, records, or data, or create previously unavailable information, records, or data, through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected via this link to the other system, including information, records, or data, that is being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.13 Can the information, whether it is: (a) in the information system, (b) in a linked information system, and/or (c) transferred from another system, be retrieved by a name or a "unique identifier" linked to an individual, e.g., SSN, name, home telephone number, fingerprint, voice print, etc.? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.14 Will the new information include personal information
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-remedy.pdf
  • Will this information system derive new information, records, or data, or create previously unavailable information, records, or data, through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected via this link to the other system, including information, records, or data, that is being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: 9 1.13 Can the information, whether it is: (a) in the information system, (b) in a linked information system, and/or (c) transferred from another system, be retrieved by a name or a "unique identifier" linked to an individual, e.g., SSN, name, home telephone number, fingerprint, voice print, etc.? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.14 Will the new information include personal information
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-rmis.pdf
  • 1.12 Will this information system derive new information, records, or data, or create previously unavailable information, records, or data, through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected via this link to the other system, including information, records, or data, that is being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.13 Can the information, whether it is: (a) in the information system, (b) in a linked information system, and/or (c) transferred from another system, be retrieved by a name or a "unique identifier" linked to an individual, e.g., SSN, name, home telephone number, fingerprint, voice print, etc.? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.14 Will the new information include personal information
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-small-business-contacts.pdf
  • 1.12 Will this information system derive new information, records, or data, or create previously unavailable information, records, or data, through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected via this link to the other system, including information, records, or data, that is being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.13 Can the information, whether it is: (a) in the information system, (b) in a linked information system, and/or (c) transferred from another system, be retrieved by a name or a "unique identifier" linked to an individual, e.g., SSN, name, home telephone number, fingerprint, voice print, etc.? Yes No Please explain your response: 10 1.14 Will the new information include personal
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-telephone-call-details.pdf
  • work together to review telephone charges and usage that require consultation with the FCC's bureaus and offices, the staffs send e-mails to the B/O's managers to request clarification about whether telephone charges and/or usages are appropriate and accurate, etc. If the ITC staff determines that the charge and/or use is inappropriate, the FCC employee must pay for this telephone call. 1.13 Can the information, whether it is: (a) in the information system, (b) in a linked information system, and/or (c) transferred from another system, be retrieved by a name or a "unique identifier" linked to an individual, e.g., SSN, name, home (personal) telephone number, fingerprint, voice print, etc.? Yes No Please explain your response: The FCC's telephone bill is organized by
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-transit.pdf
  • 1.12 Will this information system derive new information, records, or data, or create previously unavailable information, records, or data, through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected via this link to the other system, including information, records, or data, that is being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.13 Can the information, whether it is: (a) in the information system, (b) in a linked information system, and/or (c) transferred from another system, be retrieved by a name or a "unique identifier" linked to an individual, e.g., SSN, name, home telephone number, fingerprint, voice print, etc.? Yes No Please explain your response: 10 The FCC can obtain personally identifiable information
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-uls.pdf
  • information system and the personally identifiable information (PII) it contains, which is covered by FCC/WTB-1, "Wireless Services Licensing Records (ULS)" SORN, may be linked to other FCC and/or non-FCC information systems, i.e., FCC's CORES Registration System, Department of Treasury Financial Management 11 Services, U.S. Department of Justice, and/or other federal agencies that collect debts, monitor civil and criminal regulations, etc. 1.13 Can the information, whether it is: (a) in the information system, (b) in a linked information system, and/or (c) transferred from another system, be retrieved by a name or a "unique identifier" linked to an individual, e.g., SSN, name, home telephone number, fingerprint, voice print, etc.? Yes No Please explain your response: The ULS information system's personally identifiable information (PII)
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-violators.pdf
  • including information, records, or data, that is being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: The Violators File data are collected and used in the aggregate to track enforcement cases and sanctions. Information from this sytem will also be used as the basis of published and unpublished sanctons and letters of inquiry. 10 1.13 Can the information, whether it is: (a) in the information system, (b) in a linked information system, and/or (c) transferred from another system, be retrieved by a name or a "unique identifier" linked to an individual, e.g., SSN, name, home telephone number, fingerprint, voice print, etc.? Yes No Please explain your response: Information in the Violators File information system is
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pshsb-coop-plan.pdf
  • 1.12 Will this information system derive new information, records, or data, or create previously unavailable information, records, or data, through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected via this link to the other system, including information, records, or data, that is being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.13 Can the information, whether it is: (a) in the information system, (b) in a linked information system, and/or (c) transferred from another system, be retrieved by a name or a "unique identifier" linked to an individual, e.g., SSN, name, home telephone number, fingerprint, voice print, etc.? Yes No Please explain your response: 9 1.14 Will the new information include personal
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pta-broadband-dead-zone-report.pdf
  • Broadband Map, and other proceedings related to the provisioning of broadband services. In doing the above, the Commission may aggregate the address level data to less specific geographies (census block, zip code, county, etc.). The Commission may also use the data collected in combination with other non-PII broadband availability and performance [data] to create other useful data sets for analysis. 1.13 Can the information, whether it is: (a) in the information system; (b) in a linked information system; and/or (c) transferred from another system, be retrieved by a name or a "unique identifier" linked to an individual, e.g., SSN, name, home telephone number, fingerprint, voice print, etc.? Yes No Please explain your response: Individuals who participate in the Broadband Dead Zone
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pta-ccd.pdf
  • 8 Please explain your response: The PSHSB Comment Card Database is a "stand alone" information system, e.g., it has no links to other FCC and/or non-FCC information systems. If this information system is a "stand alone" information system, e.g., it does not use information from another system, and/or it is not linked to another information system, please skip to Question 1.13. 1.10 If the system uses information, including information about individuals (PII), from other information systems, what information will be used? Information system name(s): Individual's name Other names, i.e., maiden name, etc. SSN Race/Ethnicity Gender U.S. Citizenship Non-U.S. Citizenship Biometric data Finger prints Voice prints Retina scan/prints Photographs Other physical information, i.e., hair color, eye color, identifying marks, etc. Birth date/Age
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pta-clarity.pdf
  • information through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected, including (where applicable) information that is being shared or transferred from another information system? Yes No Please explain your response: As noted in Question 1.6, Clarity will track and analyze performance and cost data of the FCC's IT investment funding which will provide refined investment performance data. 1.13 Can the information, whether it is: (a) in the information system; (b) in a linked information system; and/or (c) transferred from another system, be retrieved by a name or a "unique identifier" linked to an individual, e.g., SSN, name, home telephone number, fingerprint, voice print, etc.? Yes No Please explain your response: ITC is looking for how effective its IT
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pta-core-financial.pdf
  • explain your response: At this time the Financial Systems Operations Group (FSOG) staff in OMD-FO believes that the CSFR will handle information for travel from OMD-FO's E-2 System. If this information system is a "stand alone" information system, e.g., it does not use information from another system, and/or it is not linked to another information system, please skip to Question 1.13. 1.10 If the system uses information, including information about individuals (PII), from other information systems, what information will be used? Information system name(s): National Finance Center (NFC), Procurement Desktop (PD), and Budget Execution and Accounting Management Systems (BEAMS). 8 Individual's name Other names, i.e., maiden name, etc. SSN Race/Ethnicity Gender U.S. Citizenship Non-U.S. Citizenship Biometric data Finger prints Voice prints
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pta-lmts.pdf
  • FCC and non-FCC information systems? Yes No Please explain your response: LMTS is a stand alone system. It has no links to other FCC or non-FCC information systems. If this information system is a "stand alone" information system, e.g., it does not use information from another system, and/or it is not linked to another information system, please skip to Question 1.13. 1.10 If the system uses information, including information about individuals (PII), from other information systems, what information will be used? Information system name(s): Individual's name 9 Other names, i.e., maiden name, etc. SSN: Race/Ethnicity Gender U.S. Citizenship Non-U.S. Citizenship Biometric data Finger prints Voice prints Retina scan/prints Photographs Other physical information, i.e., hair color, eye color, identifying marks, etc. Birth
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pta-pams.pdf
  • non-FCC information systems? Yes No Please explain your response: The PAMS information system is a "stand alone" information system. It has no links to other FCC information systems. If this information system is a "stand alone" information system, e.g., it does not use information from another system, and/or it is not linked to another information system, please skip to Question 1.13. 1.10 If the system uses information, including information about individuals (PII), from other information systems, what information will be used? Individual's name Other names, i.e., maiden name, etc. SSN: Race/Ethnicity Gender U.S. Citizenship Non-U.S. Citizenship Biometric data Finger prints Voice prints Retina scan/prints Photographs Other physical information, i.e., hair color, eye color, identifying marks, etc. 8 Birth date/Age Place of
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pta-rmis.pdf
  • information about individuals (PII) from other FCC financial and licensing information systems and from federal agencies, i.e., Treasury Department and the Justice Department as required by Congressional regulations. If this information system is a "stand alone" information system, e.g., it does not use information from another system, and/or it is not linked to another information system, please skip to Question 1.13. 8 1.10 If the system uses information, including information about individuals (PII), from other information systems, what information will be used? Information system name(s): FCC information systems, i.e., ROSIE and CORES, and non-FCC information systems administered by the U.S. Department of the Treasury and U.S. Department of Justice, etc. Individual's name Other names, i.e., maiden name, etc. SSN: Taxpayer Identification
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/disaster/disaster_manual.pdf
  • 2 March 9, 2009 ii Table of Contents 1 Using the System...............................................................................................1 1.1 Introduction........................................................................................................1 1.2 Accessing the Disaster Information Reporting System......................................1 1.3 Security Banner..................................................................................................1 1.4 DIRS Login........................................................................................................2 1.5 Screen for New Users.........................................................................................3 1.6 Screen for Forgotten Password Request.............................................................5 1.7 User Main Menu Screen.....................................................................................5 1.8 Display/Update Reports.....................................................................................7 1.9 Modify Password................................................................................................8 1.10 Modify User Profile............................................................................................9 1.11 Modify Company ID..........................................................................................9 1.12 Manage User.....................................................................................................10 1.13 Upload Tab Delimited File...............................................................................11 1.14 Download Excel File........................................................................................11 2 Wireline Switch...............................................................................................12 3 Wireline Digital Loop Carrier (DLC)..........................................................16 4 Wireline PSAP................................................................................................19 5 Interoffice Facilities ­ Point to Point............................................................22 6 Interoffice Facilities - Rings...........................................................................24 7 IXC Blocking...................................................................................................26 9 Wireless Cell Site by County.........................................................................31 10 Broadcast.........................................................................................................34 11 CATV...............................................................................................................37 1 Using the System 1.1 Introduction The Disaster Information Reporting System (DIRS) is a voluntary,
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/comsat-telenor/fcc01-369.pdf
  • acquisition of location-related information concerning a service subscriber; (v) preservation of any of the above information pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2703(f); and (vi) access to, or acquisition or interception of, communications or information as described in (i) through (v) above and comparable State laws. 1.12 "Foreign" where used in this Agreement, whether capitalized or lower case, means non- U.S. 1.13 "Governmental Authority" or "Governmental Authorities" mean any government, any governmental, administrative, or regulatory entity, authority, commission, board, agency, instrumentality, bureau or political subdivision and any court, tribunal, judicial or arbitral body. 1.14 "Intercept" or "Intercepted" has the meaning defined in 18 U.S.C. §2510(4). 1.15 "Lawful U.S. Process" means U.S. federal, state or local Electronic Surveillance orders or authorizations, and other
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/ltrfromaoltw062600.doc http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/ltrfromaoltw062600.pdf
  • their cumulative expertise with respect to set-top box design and functionality, the pace of deployment of digital cable service by TWC will be accelerated. 1.12 Please provide all documents relating to the digital cable rollout plans discussed in your response to request 1.11. As noted above, the parties are providing documents in response to this request under separate cover letter. 1.13 According to commenters, AOL originally pledged to work with the instant messaging (``IM'') industry to create an interoperability standard, but has since ceased participation in the standard setting process. Please provide a narrative response to the following questions. a. Is AOL actively working with other IM providers to set standards for interoperability? If not, why? If so, in what capacity?