FCC Web Documents citing 1.1315

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1272A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1272A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1272A1.txt
  • Television, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 60 RR 2d 862, 864 (1986) (informal objections must contain adequate and specific factual allegations sufficient to warrant the relief requested) (``Area Christian''). 42 U.S.C. §§ 4321-4335. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1307. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1311. See id. § 1.1308. See id. § 1.1308(d). See id. §§ 1.1308(c), 1.1309. See id. §§ 1.1305, 1.1314, 1.1315, 1.1317. EA at Section 1.1. S-R proposes to construct a 12-foot x 10-foot steel equipment platform at the base of each sub-200-foot tower and that the 425-foot tower will have a prefabricated equipment shelter measuring 24 feet x 36 feet, which also will be placed on a platform elevated 16 feet above ground level. EA at Section 1.2.2 EA at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-504A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-504A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-504A1.txt
  • the applicant may not commence construction until the Commission concludes further environmental processing, including the preparation of an environmental impact statement (\'93EIS\'94).}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \cs23\super \chftn {\footnote \ltrpar \pard\plain \ltrpar\s21\ql \li0\ri0\sa120\widctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\ rin0\lin0\itap0 \rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs20\alang1025 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \cs23\super \chftn }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \i See }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 47 C.F.R.}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \i }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \'a7\'a7 1.1305, 1.1314, 1.1315, 1.1317.}}}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \par }\pard \ltrpar\s24\ql \li0\ri0\sa220\nowidctlpar\tx720\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adju stright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af5 \ltrch\fcs0 \cf1 \tab }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \i The EA and Subsequent Information}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 .}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \cs23\super \chftn {\footnote \ltrpar \pard\plain \ltrpar\s21\ql \li0\ri0\sa120\widctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\ rin0\lin0\itap0 \rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs20\alang1025 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \cs23\super \chftn }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 The EA states that it \'93incorporates a number of environmental documents and decisions\'94
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267608A1.pdf
  • will not have a significant environmental effect." 47 C.F.R. § 1.1308(b). Where a proposal, such as a proposed wireless communications tower, has a "significant environmental effect," id., the FCC is required by NEPA to consult with expert Federal agencies and, following such consultation, to prepare a detailed environmental impact statement ("EIS"). See 42 U.S.C. § 4332(2)(c); 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1308, 1.1315, 1.1317. By requiring a ruling on each environmental assessment prior to tower construction, the FCC has retained authority over tower construction in order to ensure that it complies with NEPA. Whatever else "approval" may mean, we see no basis for CTIA's suggestion that the FCC's retention of authority to "rule[] on," 47 C.F.R. § 1.1312(b), a party's submission under NEPA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-109A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-109A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-109A1.txt
  • such as the Commission ``. . . prior to the issuance of any license . . . [to] take into account the effect of the undertaking on any district, site, building, structure or object that [qualifies as a Historic Property].'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.1307(a)(4). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1308(d). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1308(c), 1.1309. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1305, 1.1314, 1.1315, 1.1317. Letter from Michael E. Simonson, Review & Compliance Coordinator, State Historical Society of North Dakota, to Frank Stilwell, Commercial Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (November 15, 1999) (``November 15, 1999 Letter''). While the Commission's historic preservation rules do not expressly refer to properties listed on state or local registers of historic properties, such local registers are important sources of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-270A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-270A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-270A1.txt
  • by two Nationwide Programmatic Agreements to be published as appendices to Part 1 of the Commission's rules. See Nationwide Programmatic Agreement Regarding the Section 106 National Preservation Act Review Process, WT Docket No. 03-128, Report and Order, FCC 04-222 (rel. October 5, 2004). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1308(d). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1308(c), 1.1309. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1305, 1.1314, 1.1315, 1.1317. See Letter from Michael E. Simonson, Review and Compliance Coordinator, State Historical Society to Frank Stilwell, Commercial Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (November 15, 1999). See Letter from Rose Crellin, Commercial Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, to Grant Hoovestol, Western Wireless Corporation (December 14, 1999). The Commission also directed Western to file, within 30 days of the release of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-181A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-181A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-181A1.txt
  • tower registrations as federal undertakings within the meaning of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, 16 U.S.C. § 470f, is a permissible interpretation in light of the preconstruction approval process that it has implemented to assure that communications towers are not a risk to air safety under Section 303(q) of the Communications Act). 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1305, 1.1314, 1.1315, 1.1317. The Commission has found no common pattern that would enable it to specify actions that automatically require an EIS. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1305. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1307. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.1308(b)(3) (``The EA is a document which shall explain the environmental consequences of the proposal and set forth sufficient analysis for the Bureau or the Commission to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-181A1_Rcd.pdf
  • treatment of tower registrations as federal undertakings within the meaning of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, 16 U.S.C. § 470f,is a permissible interpretation in light of the preconstruction approval process that it has implemented to assure that communications towers are not a risk to air safety under Section 303(q) of the Communications Act). 3547 C.F.R. §§1.1305, 1.1314, 1.1315, 1.1317. The Commission has found no common pattern that would enable it to specify actions that automatically require an EIS. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1305. 3647 C.F.R. § 1.1307. See also47 C.F.R. § 1.1308(b)(3) ("The EA is a document which shall explain the environmental consequences of the proposal and set forth sufficient analysis for the Bureau or the Commission to reach
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/FCC-03-109A1.html
  • such as the Commission ``. . . prior to the issuance of any license . . . [to] take into account the effect of the undertaking on any district, site, building, structure or object that [qualifies as a Historic Property].'' 9 47 C.F.R. 1.1307(a)(4). 10 47 C.F.R. 1.1308(d). 11 See 47 C.F.R. 1.1308(c), 1.1309. 12 See 47 C.F.R. 1.1305, 1.1314, 1.1315, 1.1317. 13 Letter from Michael E. Simonson, Review & Compliance Coordinator, State Historical Society of North Dakota, to Frank Stilwell, Commercial Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (November 15, 1999) (``November 15, 1999 Letter''). 14 While the Commission's historic preservation rules do not expressly refer to properties listed on state or local registers of historic properties, such local registers are important
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/FCC-04-270A1.html
  • modified and supplemented by two Nationwide Programmatic Agreements to be published as appendices to Part 1 of the Commission's rules. See Nationwide Programmatic Agreement Regarding the Section 106 National Preservation Act Review Process, WT Docket No. 03-128, Report and Order, FCC 04-222 (rel. October 5, 2004). 8See 47 C.F.R. 1.1308(d). 9See 47 C.F.R. 1.1308(c), 1.1309. 10See 47 C.F.R. 1.1305, 1.1314, 1.1315, 1.1317. 11See Letter from Michael E. Simonson, Review and Compliance Coordinator, State Historical Society to Frank Stilwell, Commercial Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (November 15, 1999). 12See Letter from Rose Crellin, Commercial Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, to Grant Hoovestol, Western Wireless Corporation (December 14, 1999). 13The Commission also directed Western to file, within 30 days of the release of
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/siting/fact2.pdf
  • * § 1.1307 Actions which may have a significant environmental effect, for which Environmental Assessments (EAs) must be prepared. (a) Commission actions with respect to the following types of facilities may significantly affect the environment and thus require the preparation of EAs by the applicant (see §§ 1.1308 and 1.1311) and may require further Commission environmental processing (see §§ 1.1314, 1.1315 and 1.1317): (1) Facilities that are to be located in an officially designated wilderness area. (2) Facilities that are to be located in an officially designated wildlife preserve. (3) Facilities that: (i) May affect listed threatened or endangered species or designated critical habitats; or (ii) are likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any proposed endangered or threatened species or
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/siting/npaguid.html
  • Division issues a FONSI and the application is granted. If the amended application does not eliminate the environmental problem, the Enforcement Division will either recommend the denial of the application or will work with the applicant to proceed with the project upon preparation of an environmental impact statement (EIS). Should the Bureau decide to proceed with the action, sections [52]1.1314, [53]1.1315 and [54]1.1317 require a notice of intent that EISs will be prepared, then a draft and final EISs be prepared and announced in the Federal Register. [55]Return to Top Last reviewed/updated on 5/21/2009. __________________________________________________________________ [56]Skip FCC Navigation Links [57]FCC Home | [58]Search | [59]RSS | [60]Updates | [61]E-Filing | [62]Initiatives | [63]Consumers | [64]Find People __________________________________________________________________ [65]Licensing, Technical Support and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/FCC-03-109A1.html
  • such as the Commission ``. . . prior to the issuance of any license . . . [to] take into account the effect of the undertaking on any district, site, building, structure or object that [qualifies as a Historic Property].'' 9 47 C.F.R. 1.1307(a)(4). 10 47 C.F.R. 1.1308(d). 11 See 47 C.F.R. 1.1308(c), 1.1309. 12 See 47 C.F.R. 1.1305, 1.1314, 1.1315, 1.1317. 13 Letter from Michael E. Simonson, Review & Compliance Coordinator, State Historical Society of North Dakota, to Frank Stilwell, Commercial Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (November 15, 1999) (``November 15, 1999 Letter''). 14 While the Commission's historic preservation rules do not expressly refer to properties listed on state or local registers of historic properties, such local registers are important
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/FCC-04-270A1.html
  • modified and supplemented by two Nationwide Programmatic Agreements to be published as appendices to Part 1 of the Commission's rules. See Nationwide Programmatic Agreement Regarding the Section 106 National Preservation Act Review Process, WT Docket No. 03-128, Report and Order, FCC 04-222 (rel. October 5, 2004). 8See 47 C.F.R. 1.1308(d). 9See 47 C.F.R. 1.1308(c), 1.1309. 10See 47 C.F.R. 1.1305, 1.1314, 1.1315, 1.1317. 11See Letter from Michael E. Simonson, Review and Compliance Coordinator, State Historical Society to Frank Stilwell, Commercial Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (November 15, 1999). 12See Letter from Rose Crellin, Commercial Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, to Grant Hoovestol, Western Wireless Corporation (December 14, 1999). 13The Commission also directed Western to file, within 30 days of the release of
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1272A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1272A1.pdf
  • Television, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 60 RR 2d 862, 864 (1986) (informal objections must contain adequate and specific factual allegations sufficient to warrant the relief requested) (``Area Christian''). 42 U.S.C. §§ 4321-4335. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1307. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1311. See id. § 1.1308. See id. § 1.1308(d). See id. §§ 1.1308(c), 1.1309. See id. §§ 1.1305, 1.1314, 1.1315, 1.1317. EA at Section 1.1. S-R proposes to construct a 12-foot x 10-foot steel equipment platform at the base of each sub-200-foot tower and that the 425-foot tower will have a prefabricated equipment shelter measuring 24 feet x 36 feet, which also will be placed on a platform elevated 16 feet above ground level. EA at Section 1.2.2 EA at
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-504A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-504A1.pdf
  • the applicant may not commence construction until the Commission concludes further environmental processing, including the preparation of an environmental impact statement (\'93EIS\'94).}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \cs23\super \chftn {\footnote \ltrpar \pard\plain \ltrpar\s21\ql \li0\ri0\sa120\widctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\ rin0\lin0\itap0 \rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs20\alang1025 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \cs23\super \chftn }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \i See }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 47 C.F.R.}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \i }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \'a7\'a7 1.1305, 1.1314, 1.1315, 1.1317.}}}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \par }\pard \ltrpar\s24\ql \li0\ri0\sa220\nowidctlpar\tx720\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adju stright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af5 \ltrch\fcs0 \cf1 \tab }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \i The EA and Subsequent Information}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 .}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \cs23\super \chftn {\footnote \ltrpar \pard\plain \ltrpar\s21\ql \li0\ri0\sa120\widctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\ rin0\lin0\itap0 \rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs20\alang1025 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \cs23\super \chftn }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 The EA states that it \'93incorporates a number of environmental documents and decisions\'94
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-03-109A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-03-109A1.pdf
  • such as the Commission ``. . . prior to the issuance of any license . . . [to] take into account the effect of the undertaking on any district, site, building, structure or object that [qualifies as a Historic Property].'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.1307(a)(4). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1308(d). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1308(c), 1.1309. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1305, 1.1314, 1.1315, 1.1317. Letter from Michael E. Simonson, Review & Compliance Coordinator, State Historical Society of North Dakota, to Frank Stilwell, Commercial Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (November 15, 1999) (``November 15, 1999 Letter''). While the Commission's historic preservation rules do not expressly refer to properties listed on state or local registers of historic properties, such local registers are important sources of