FCC Web Documents citing 1.201

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1044A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1044A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1044A1.txt
  • are estopped from claiming EUCL charges for Complainants' semi-public payphones. We reject this view. As a way of recovering their costs, the LECs were lawfully entitled to assess the EUCL on semi-public payphones. Thus, the Defendants may retain the EUCL charge for the IPPs' semi-public payphones. PROCEDURAL DESIGNATIONS A. Procedural and Evidentiary Rules This Proceeding shall be governed by section 1.201 through 1.364 of the Commission's rules of practice for hearing proceedings, to the extent practicable for the adjudication of these issues. The ALJ may, in his discretion, require that the parties submit all or any portion of their case in writing if he determines that such written submission would contribute significantly to the disposition of the proceeding. Consolidation We conclude
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1829A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1829A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1829A1.txt
  • complete record concerning the reformulated service. Because we are not determining the lawfulness of the post-Liability Order changes to the Service, this referral is limited to determining damages caused by the U S WEST Service as it is described in the Liability Order. PROCEDURAL DESIGNATIONS A. Procedural and Evidentiary Rules The hearings before the ALJ shall be governed by sections 1.201 through 1.364 of the Commission's rules of practice for hearing proceedings, to the extent those rules are practicable for the adjudication of these issues. The ALJ may, in his discretion, require that the parties submit all or any portion of their case in writing, if he determines that such written submission would contribute significantly to the disposition of the proceeding.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3048A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3048A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3048A1.txt
  • the Alabama Power Decision's standard and explaining the significance of that evidence. After carefully reviewing the parties' submissions, we conclude that Gulf Power should be afforded the opportunity to present the evidence delineated in its Description of Evidence during a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge (``ALJ''). procedural designations Procedural and Evidentiary Rules This proceeding shall be governed by sections 1.201 through 1.364 of the Commission's rules of practice for hearing proceedings, to the extent practicable for the adjudication of this issue. The ALJ may, in his discretion, require the parties to submit all or any portion of their case in writing if he determines that such written submissions would contribute significantly to the disposition of the proceeding. Discovery Discovery shall
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-224A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-224A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-224A1.txt
  • information submitted to the Commission be withheld from public inspection.) In lieu of deciding the case on the mediation record, the Chief may issue a Hearing Designation Order for commencement of an evidentiary hearing and a decision by a Commission Administrative Law Judge (ALJ). 800 MHz Report and Order, � 194. Id. Any such hearing would be governed by Sections 1.201-1.364 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.201-1.364. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.276. 800 MHz Report and Order, � 201. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 % & - & s z tm � � � ��������ƿƿƿ��ƿƿƿƿ��ƿƿ��ƿƼư����`��������� F F ��PNG r v ��"r�9 I'6�
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2487A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2487A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2487A1.txt
  • amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 309(e), the burden of proceeding with the introduction of evidence and the burden of proof with respect to all of the issues specified above SHALL BE on Hartmann, Jr. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that this hearing will be governed by the rules of practice and procedure pertaining to the Commission's Hearing Proceedings, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.201-1.364, subject to the ALJ's discretion to regulate the hearing. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that all Discovery shall be conducted in accordance with 47 C.F.R. �� 1.311-1.325, subject to the ALJ's discretion. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Secretary of the Commission SHALL CAUSE to have this Hearing Designation Order or a summary thereof published in the Federal Register. This action
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2487A1_Erratum.doc
  • amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 309(e), the burden of proceeding with the introduction of evidence and the burden of proof with respect to all of the issues specified above SHALL BE on Hartmann, Jr. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that this hearing will be governed by the rules of practice and procedure pertaining to the Commission's Hearing Proceedings, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.201-1.364, subject to the ALJ's discretion to regulate the hearing. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that all Discovery shall be conducted in accordance with 47 C.F.R. �� 1.311-1.325, subject to the ALJ's discretion. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Secretary of the Commission SHALL CAUSE to have this Hearing Designation Order or a summary thereof published in the Federal Register. This action
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-494A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-494A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-494A1.txt
  • Act. Issue Relating to Relief 7. To determine, in light of the evidence adduced on the foregoing issues, whether Complainants are entitled to the relief requested in the Complaint, and if so, the nature and scope of the relief to which Complainants are entitled. procedural designations Procedural and Evidentiary Rules The proceeding before the ALJ shall be governed by sections 1.201 through 1.364 of the Commission's rules of practice for hearing proceedings, to the extent practicable for the adjudication of this matter. The ALJ may, in his discretion, require the parties to submit all or any portion of their case in writing if he determines that such written submissions would contribute significantly to the disposition of the proceeding. Discovery Discovery shall
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-494A1_Erratum.doc
  • Act. Issue Relating to Relief 7. To determine, in light of the evidence adduced on the foregoing issues, whether Complainants are entitled to the relief requested in the Complaint, and if so, the nature and scope of the relief to which Complainants are entitled. procedural designations Procedural and Evidentiary Rules The proceeding before the ALJ shall be governed by sections 1.201 through 1.364 of the Commission's rules of practice for hearing proceedings, to the extent practicable for the adjudication of this matter. The ALJ may, in his discretion, require the parties to submit all or any portion of their case in writing if he determines that such written submissions would contribute significantly to the disposition of the proceeding. Discovery Discovery shall
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1631A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1631A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1631A1.txt
  • C.F.R. � 90.677(d)(2). City of Boston and Sprint Nextel, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 21 FCC Rcd. 14661 (PSHSB 2006) (Boston Order). Id. at 14665 � 16. Id. at 14670-71 �� 31-32. 47 C.F.R � 90.677(d)(2). As we stated in the De Novo Procedures PN, supra n. 11, the evidentiary hearing before the Administrative Law Judge will be governed by Sections 1.201-1.364 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.201-1.364. De Novo Procedures PN, 21 FCC Rcd at 760 � 11 n.12 See 47 C.F.R. � 1.254. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 07-1631 Federal Communications Commission DA 07-1631 � % N d n 3n s } � � � � \ h� h� h� F � 0 0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1658A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1658A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1658A1.txt
  • section 1.120(d) is deleted. The references to section 1.120 are replaced in the following rules with references to section 1.117, the rule that immediately precedes section 1.120: 1.101, 1.207(c), 1.1317(a), 73.1010(a)(1), and 74.5(a)(1). The reference to section 1.120 in section 74.5(a)(2), which is listed as the first rule in Part 1, Subpart B of the Commission's rules, is changed to 1.201, which is the next rule after 1.120 and is also the first rule in Part 1, Subpart B. Part 1, Subpart B, Hearing Proceedings. This Order amends the following rules in Part 1, Subpart B, Hearing Proceedings, to delete obsolete rules and references and make other corrections: Sections 1.227(b)(6) and 1.229(b)(2) are without current legal effect and are deleted as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-111A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-111A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-111A1.txt
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution, the period for Administrative Law Judge review shall be tolled, until such time as the parties notify the Commission that they have failed to reach a settlement through Alternative Dispute Resolution. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that this hearing will be governed by the rules of practice and procedure pertaining to the Commission's Hearing Proceedings, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.201-1.364, subject to the Administrative Law Judge's discretion to regulate the hearing. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that all Discovery shall be conducted in accordance with 47 C.F.R. �� 1.311-1.325, subject to the Administrative Law Judge's discretion. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Chief, Enforcement Bureau will be a party to the proceeding and will determine its level of participation. IT IS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-72A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-72A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-72A1.txt
  • 7539, 7340 (MB 2010) (``[W]e consider established legal standards for waiver pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules. We have authority to waive our rules if there is ``good cause'' to do so. We may exercise our discretion to waive a rule where particular facts would make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest.'') (footnotes omitted). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.201, 1.283. See, e.g., Pamplin Broadcasting, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 649, 651-52 n.15 (2008) (staff routinely waives 100 percent coverage of principal community requirement of Section 73.24(j) of the Rules for applicants showing at least 80 per cent coverage); State of Oregon, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 16 FCC Rcd 4344, 4345 (2001) (staff routinely waives Section 74.1204(a)
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011044.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011044.html
  • are estopped from claiming EUCL charges for Complainants' semi-public payphones. We reject this view. As a way of recovering their costs, the LECs were lawfully entitled to assess the EUCL on semi-public payphones. Thus, the Defendants may retain the EUCL charge for the IPPs' semi-public payphones. PROCEDURAL DESIGNATIONS A. Procedural and Evidentiary Rules This Proceeding shall be governed by section 1.201 through 1.364 of the Commission's rules of practice for hearing proceedings, to the extent practicable for the adjudication of these issues. The ALJ may, in his discretion, require that the parties submit all or any portion of their case in writing if he determines that such written submission would contribute significantly to the disposition of the proceeding. Consolidation We conclude
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-3048A1.html
  • Decision's standard and explaining the significance of that evidence.20 After carefully reviewing the parties' submissions, we conclude that Gulf Power should be afforded the opportunity to present the evidence delineated in its Description of Evidence during a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge (``ALJ'').21 III. PROCEDURAL DESIGNATIONS III.A. Procedural and Evidentiary Rules 6. This proceeding shall be governed by sections 1.201 through 1.364 of the Commission's rules of practice for hearing proceedings, to the extent practicable for the adjudication of this issue.22 The ALJ may, in his discretion, require the parties to submit all or any portion of their case in writing if he determines that such written submissions would contribute significantly to the disposition of the proceeding.23 III.B. Discovery 7.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-2487A1.html
  • 47 U.S.C. SS 154(i), 309(e), the burden of proceeding with the introduction of evidence and the burden of proof with respect to all of the issues specified above SHALL BE on Hartmann, Jr. 12. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that this hearing will be governed by the rules of practice and procedure pertaining to the Commission's Hearing Proceedings, 47 C.F.R. SS 1.201-1.364, subject to the ALJ's discretion to regulate the hearing. 13. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that all Discovery shall be conducted in accordance with 47 C.F.R. SS 1.311-1.325, subject to the ALJ's discretion. 14. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Secretary of the Commission SHALL CAUSE to have this Hearing Designation Order or a summary thereof published in the Federal Register.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-494A1.html
  • to Relief 7. To determine, in light of the evidence adduced on the foregoing issues, whether Complainants are entitled to the relief requested in the Complaint, and if so, the nature and scope of the relief to which Complainants are entitled. V. procedural designations A. Procedural and Evidentiary Rules 19. The proceeding before the ALJ shall be governed by sections 1.201 through 1.364 of the Commission's rules of practice for hearing proceedings, to the extent practicable for the adjudication of this matter. The ALJ may, in his discretion, require the parties to submit all or any portion of their case in writing if he determines that such written submissions would contribute significantly to the disposition of the proceeding. A. Discovery 20.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • 2.60 8.004.604.60 15.00 9.05 9.05 23.0015.0015.00 January 15, 1937 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.551.051.05 2.551.55 1.55 3.602.10 2.10 6.554.004.00 12.75 8.10 8.10 23.0014.9514.95 May 1, 1940 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.551.051.05 2.551.55 1.55 3.602.10 2.10 6.004.004.00 10.00 6.55 6.55 13.1010.0010.00 July 10, 1941 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.551.051.05 2.551.55 1.55 3.502.10 2.10 5.504.004.00 9.55 6.55 6.55 13.1010.0010.00 February 15, 1943 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.201.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 4.453.303.30 7.80 5.50 5.50 11.00 8.25 8.25 July 1, 1945 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.201.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 4.453.303.30 6.15 4.95 4.95 6.70 5.50 5.50 February 1, 1946 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.201.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 4.453.303.30 5.55 4.45 4.45 6.70 5.50 5.50 March 1, 1952 0.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.251.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 3.952.852.85 5.55
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 2.60 8.004.604.60 15.00 9.05 9.05 23.0015.0015.00 January 15, 1937 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.551.051.05 2.551.55 1.55 3.602.10 2.10 6.554.004.00 12.75 8.10 8.10 23.0014.9514.95 May 1, 1940 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.551.051.05 2.551.55 1.55 3.602.10 2.10 6.004.004.00 10.00 6.55 6.55 13.1010.0010.00 July 10, 1941 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.551.051.05 2.551.55 1.55 3.502.10 2.10 5.504.004.00 9.55 6.55 6.55 13.1010.0010.00 February 15, 1943 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.201.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 4.453.303.30 7.80 5.50 5.50 11.00 8.25 8.25 July 1, 1945 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.201.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 4.453.303.30 6.15 4.95 4.95 6.70 5.50 5.50 February 1, 1946 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.201.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 4.453.303.30 5.55 4.45 4.45 6.70 5.50 5.50 March 1, 1952 0.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.251.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 3.952.852.85 5.55
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OSEC/library/legislative_histories/43.pdf
  • Telephone Co -_----_______---- _ -_______________-__ 614 Delphos Home Telephone Co - -_____________________---___-___-- 1,241 Eaton Telephone Co _ ----------------_----________ ____--------_- 850 Elyria Telephone Co ----------_______ -------- ____________--4-- . 4,876 E!dorado & West Manchester Telephone Co_ - -_______________---- 425 Farmers Telephone Co., Perrysville_________...___________________- 629 Fayette Telephone Co --------_________-------- - __________------ 400 Frayzeysburg Telephone Co ----_______-------------.--- --------- 411 Geneva Telephone Co ----------- __--___------------------------- 1.201 Greenfield Telephone Co -----________.------------.------------- 1,040 Greenspring Telephone & Electric Co ---------------------------- 287 Harrison Telephone Co_________________--------------------- _-_ 567 Highland County Telephone Co ---------------------------------- 1, 394 Huron Telephone Co--------------------------------------_------ 3.52 Interstate Telephone Co., Union City_----------------------------- 255 Kelly Island & Sandusky Cable Co_------------------------------ 2.56 Kenton Telephone Co ------------------------------------------ 2, 024 Lima Telephone & Telegraph Co--------------------------------- 7,388 Logan Home Telegraph Co__ ________.-------------------------- 1. 64
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011044.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011044.html
  • are estopped from claiming EUCL charges for Complainants' semi-public payphones. We reject this view. As a way of recovering their costs, the LECs were lawfully entitled to assess the EUCL on semi-public payphones. Thus, the Defendants may retain the EUCL charge for the IPPs' semi-public payphones. PROCEDURAL DESIGNATIONS A. Procedural and Evidentiary Rules This Proceeding shall be governed by section 1.201 through 1.364 of the Commission's rules of practice for hearing proceedings, to the extent practicable for the adjudication of these issues. The ALJ may, in his discretion, require that the parties submit all or any portion of their case in writing if he determines that such written submission would contribute significantly to the disposition of the proceeding. Consolidation We conclude
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-3048A1.html
  • Decision's standard and explaining the significance of that evidence.20 After carefully reviewing the parties' submissions, we conclude that Gulf Power should be afforded the opportunity to present the evidence delineated in its Description of Evidence during a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge (``ALJ'').21 III. PROCEDURAL DESIGNATIONS III.A. Procedural and Evidentiary Rules 6. This proceeding shall be governed by sections 1.201 through 1.364 of the Commission's rules of practice for hearing proceedings, to the extent practicable for the adjudication of this issue.22 The ALJ may, in his discretion, require the parties to submit all or any portion of their case in writing if he determines that such written submissions would contribute significantly to the disposition of the proceeding.23 III.B. Discovery 7.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-2487A1.html
  • 47 U.S.C. SS 154(i), 309(e), the burden of proceeding with the introduction of evidence and the burden of proof with respect to all of the issues specified above SHALL BE on Hartmann, Jr. 12. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that this hearing will be governed by the rules of practice and procedure pertaining to the Commission's Hearing Proceedings, 47 C.F.R. SS 1.201-1.364, subject to the ALJ's discretion to regulate the hearing. 13. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that all Discovery shall be conducted in accordance with 47 C.F.R. SS 1.311-1.325, subject to the ALJ's discretion. 14. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Secretary of the Commission SHALL CAUSE to have this Hearing Designation Order or a summary thereof published in the Federal Register.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-494A1.html
  • to Relief 7. To determine, in light of the evidence adduced on the foregoing issues, whether Complainants are entitled to the relief requested in the Complaint, and if so, the nature and scope of the relief to which Complainants are entitled. V. procedural designations A. Procedural and Evidentiary Rules 19. The proceeding before the ALJ shall be governed by sections 1.201 through 1.364 of the Commission's rules of practice for hearing proceedings, to the extent practicable for the adjudication of this matter. The ALJ may, in his discretion, require the parties to submit all or any portion of their case in writing if he determines that such written submissions would contribute significantly to the disposition of the proceeding. A. Discovery 20.
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-11-72A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-11-72A1.pdf
  • 7539, 7340 (MB 2010) (``[W]e consider established legal standards for waiver pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules. We have authority to waive our rules if there is ``good cause'' to do so. We may exercise our discretion to waive a rule where particular facts would make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest.'') (footnotes omitted). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.201, 1.283. See, e.g., Pamplin Broadcasting, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 649, 651-52 n.15 (2008) (staff routinely waives 100 percent coverage of principal community requirement of Section 73.24(j) of the Rules for applicants showing at least 80 per cent coverage); State of Oregon, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 16 FCC Rcd 4344, 4345 (2001) (staff routinely waives Section 74.1204(a)