FCC Web Documents citing 1.23

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2671A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2671A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2671A1.txt
  • of Astrolink pursuant to Section 25.145(g) of the FCC Rules, June 30, 2000. See also Ex Parte Presentation of Astrolink in IB Docket No. 98-172, dated December 30, 1999. Letter from Richard L. Gobbi to Thomas S. Tycz, dated January 19, 2000. Ex parte presentation of Astrolink in IB Docket No. 98-172, dated December 30, 1999. See ITU Radio Regulation S1.23. See also 47 C.F.R. § 2.1 (defining ``space operations''). See ITU Radio Regulation S1.21. See also Amendment of the Commission's Rules with Regard to the 3650-3700 MHz Government Transfer Band, FCC 00-363, ¶ ¶ 33, 132 (released October 24, 2000) (Part 2 of the Commission's Rules permits TT&C operations in the 3650-3700 MHz band for satellite systems that include operations
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-87A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-87A5.txt
  • 3.07 Sweden 1.68 1.14 0.86 2.15 1.77 1.16 2.98 2.41 1.59 U.K. 0.64 0.61 0.62 0.91 0.87 0.90 1.74 1.69 1.27 Attachment 4 EU interconnection rates U.S. Cents per minute at peak rates Local Single Transit Double Transit 1997 1998 1999 1997 1998 1999 1997 1998 1999 Country Austria 8.36 2.00 1.91 8.36 2.00 1.91 9.24 2.63 2.52 Belgium 3.05 1.23 1.12 3.05 2.33 1.89 3.98 3.26 2.69 Denmark 1.08 1.09 0.98 2.00 2.02 1.75 2.44 2.46 2.00 Finland 1.99 1.58 1.50 1.99 1.58 1.50 4.61 3.12 3.44 France 0.78 0.78 0.64 1.90 1.90 1.57 2.80 2.80 2.34 Germany 1.10 1.10 1.06 1.88 1.88 1.81 2.87 2.86 2.76 Greece n/a 2.01 n/a n/a 2.01 n/a n/a 2.87 n/a Italy 1.69 1.68
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.txt
  • communicate and interact more quickly and efficiently, thereby speeding disaster relief efforts. Preliminary Views: At WRC-03, the United States should support the identification of globally/regionally harmonized frequency bands for the provision of public protection and disaster relief services. (17 April 2001) Doc.IWG-6/014 (Rev.2) 17 April 2001 Paul Rinaldo prinaldo@arrl.org Informal Working Group 6 PRELIMINARY VIEW ON WRC-03 WRC-2003 Agenda Item 1.23: to consider realignment of the allocations to the amateur, amateur-satellite and broadcasting services around 7 MHz on a worldwide basis, taking into account Recommendation 718 (WARC-92); ISSUE: The need for a worldwide exclusive spectrum allocation for the amateur and amateur-satellite services in the three ITU Regions. BACKGROUND: Before 1938 the amateur service was allocated 300 kHz, 7000-7300 kHz, on a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1525A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1525A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1525A1.txt
  • each state. Verizon's region-specific monthly weighted direct cost estimate is calculated by summing over each state's weighted annual direct cost estimate and dividing by 12. Verizon increases its region-specific monthly weighted direct cost estimate by multiplying it by a region-specific overhead loading factor. The specific overhead loading factors employed by Verizon in its 2000 study are 1.32 for New York/Connecticut, 1.23 for states in Verizon South, and 1.0 for Verizon New England. The resulting region-specific calculations are referred to as the ``monthly rates.'' Verizon appears to have conducted its 2000 study for each state and corresponding region with respect to: (1) power provision at less than or equal to 60 amps; and (2) power provision at greater than 60 amps. Verizon
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2168A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2168A1.txt
  • S1.57 amateur-satellite service: A radiocommunication service using space stations on earth satellites for the same purpose as those of the amateur service. Reasons: At this time the United States does not support changes in Article S25 that would require consequential changes in the terms and definitions in Article S1. 8 DRAFT PRELIMINARY VIEW ON WRC-03 Doc. WAC/040/rev1(28.08.01) WRC-2003 Agenda Item 1.23: to consider realignment of the allocations to the amateur, amateur-satellite and broadcasting services around 7 MHz on a worldwide basis, taking into account Recommendation 718 (WARC-92); ISSUE: The need for a worldwide exclusive spectrum allocation for the amateur and amateur-satellite services in the three ITU Regions. BACKGROUND: Before 1938 the amateur service was allocated 300 kHz, 7000-7300 kHz, on a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-101A1.txt
  • to-date do not indicate that any new regulatory provisions or procedures would be required to meet the spectrum requirements for the operation of TT&C below 17 GHz for FSS systems with service links above 17 GHz. 33 Proposal: USA/xx/1 ARTICLE S1 Terms and definitions * * * * * Section III ­ Radio services * * * * * NOC S1.23 space operation service: A radiocommunication service concerned exclusively with the operation of spacecraft, in particular space tracking, space telemetry and space telecommand. These functions will normally be provided within the service in which the space station is operating. * * * * * Reasons: The current regulatory situation provides sufficient and appropriate flexibility to accommodate the spectrum requirements for the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.txt
  • the members of IWG-5 to create a proposal for WRC-03 Agenda Item 1.5 that will serve all of the users of the 5150-5250 MHz band and be successful at WRC 2003. Very truly yours, David E. Weinreich Spectrum Manager V. Informal Working Group 6: Public Protection and Other Issues DRAFT PROPOSAL FOR THE WORK OF THE CONFERENCE WRC-03 Agenda Item 1.23: to consider realignment of the allocations to the amateur, amateur-satellite and broadcasting services around 7 MHz on a worldwide basis, taking into account Recommendation 718 (WARC-92); ISSUE: The need for a worldwide exclusive spectrum allocation for the amateur and amateur-satellite services in the three ITU Regions. BACKGROUND: Studies in response to Recommendation 718 (WARC-92) have been ongoing in ITU-R for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1779A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1779A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1779A1.txt
  • = 90 kHz 5840-5900 kHz = 60 kHz (*) 7350-7650 kHz = 300 kHz (*)(**) 9290-9400 kHz = 110 kHz (*) 9900-9940 kHz = 40 kHz (*) 850 kHz * Band adjacent to the HF broadcasting bands governed by Article S12 ** Band location may need to be revised in light of actions decided with respect to WRC-03 agenda item 1.23 All of these bands are currently allocated to the fixed and/or mobile services. Proposals USA/1.36/1 4438-4650 kHz Allocation to services Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 MOD 4 438-4 65004444 4438-4500 4650 FIXED MOBILE except aeronautical mobile (R) 4 438-4500 4650 FIXED MOBILE except aeronautical mobile MOD 4 500-4 650 BROADCASTING 5.uuu ADD 5.uuu The band 4500-4650 kHz is allocated,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.txt
  • for the co-channel, the adjacent channels and the second adjacent channels. 1 The definitions in §§ 1.7, 1.8, 1.9, 1.10 and 1.11 of the Annex apply to these calculations. USA/xx/10 MOD 3.9.4 The guardbands at both the lower and upper edges may be used for transmission in the space operation service to provide space operations functions in accordance with No. 1.23 in support of thte operation of geostationary-satellite networks in the broadcasting-satellite service. USA/xx/11 NOC ANNEX 7 (WRC-2000) Orbital position limitations Reason: The ITU-R studies lead to the conclusion that the proposed changes to the sharing criteria did not warrant changing the §A3 limitations. APPENDIX 30A ANNEX 1 Limits for determining whether a service of an administration is considered to be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2512A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2512A2.txt
  • Associated Data, or U.S. Hosting Data, including Transactional Data or Subscriber Information. 1.21 "Party" and "Parties" have the meanings given them in the Preamble. 1.22 `Pro firma assignments" or "pro firma transfers of control" are transfers that do not involve a substantial change in ownership or control as provided by Section 63.24 of the FCC's Rules (47 C.F.R. 0 63.24). 1.23 "Sensitive Information" means information that is not Classified Information regarding (a) the persons or facilities that are the subjects of Lawful U.S. Process, (b) the identity of the government agency or agencies serving such Lawful U.S. Process, (c) the location or identity of the line, circuit, transmission path, or other facilities or equipment used to conduct Electronic Surveillance pursuant to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3071A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3071A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3071A1.txt
  • in the agenda for the next WRC, and to give its views on the preliminary agenda for the subsequent conference and on possible agenda items for future conferences, taking into account Resolution 801 (WRC-2000); Background Information: WRC-03 is competent to make all the decisions that are necessary for allocations within the 4 -10 MHz spectral region through its agenda items 1.23 and 1.36 and, as noted above. All the data and analysis have been done, and will be thoroughly documented in the final CPM report. A proposal to eliminate the preliminary agenda item 2.5 from the final WRC-06 agenda will help to support the general feeling that something should be done to minimize unnecessary workloads at WRCs. Furthermore, WRC-92 reallocated 200
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3121A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3121A3.txt
  • carriers, ISPs and other critical infrastructures; descriptions of IP networks and operations processes and procedures for management control ad relation to the backbone infiastructure(s) including other service providers; description of any unique/proprietary control mechanisms as well as operating and administrative software; and network performance information. 1.22. subsidiaries and affiliates. `New GX" means GC Acquisition Limited, a Bermuda corporation, and its 1.23. `New GX Board" means the board of directors of New GX 1.24. "OPM" means the Office of Personnel Management of the U.S. Government. 1.25. "Party" and "Parties" have the meanings given them in the Preamble. 1.26. not involve a substantial change in ownership or control as provided by the FCC's Rules. "Pro forma assignments" or `bra forma transfers of control"
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-91A1.txt
  • = 90 kHz 5840-5900 kHz = 60 kHz (*) 7350-7650 kHz = 300 kHz (*)(**) 9290-9400 kHz = 110 kHz (*) 9900-9940 kHz = 40 kHz (*) 850 kHz * Band adjacent to the HF broadcasting bands governed by Article 12. ** Band location may need to be revised in light of actions decided with respect to WRC-03 agenda item 1.23. Requirements of Other Services in the 4 to 10 MHz Bands All of these bands identified by ITU-R Working Party 6E to accommodate new broadcasting allocations are currently allocated to the fixed and/or mobile services and are extensively used. Sharing between the fixed, mobile and broadcasting services is not practical. Therefore, no additional allocations can be made to broadcasting service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2668A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2668A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2668A2.txt
  • and an individual or entity to perform functions covered by this Agreement. 1.21 ``Party'' and ``Parties'' have the meanings given them in the Preamble. 1.22 ``Pro forma assignments'' or ``pro forma transfers of control'' are transfers that do not involve a substantial change in ownership or control as provided by Section 63.24 of the FCC's Rules (47 C.F.R. § 63.24). 1.23 ``Security Officer'' means the person designated pursuant to Section 3.10 of this Agreement. 1.24 ``Sensitive Information'' means information that is not Classified Information regarding (a) the persons or facilities that are the subjects of Lawful U.S. Process, (b) the identity of the government agency or agencies serving such Lawful U.S. Process, (c) the location or identity of the line, circuit,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2481A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2481A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2481A1.txt
  • 5-1 (continued) (Rev.WRC-073) Reference of Article 9 Case Frequency bands (and Region) of the service for which coordination is sought Threshold/condition Calculation method Remarks No. 9.7 GSO/GSO (cont.) 3) 17.7-20.2 GHz, (Regions 2 and 3), 17.3-20.2 GHz (Region 1) and 27.5-30 GHz i) Bandwidth overlap, and ii) any network in the FSS and any associated space operation functions (see No. 1.23) with a space station within an orbital arc of ( 8° of the nominal orbital position of a proposed network in the FSS 4) 18.0-18.3 GHz i) Bandwidth overlap, and ii) any network in the FSS or MetSat service and any associated space operation functions (see No. 1.23) with a space station within an orbital arc of ( 8° of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-476A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-476A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-476A1.txt
  • to WRC-03 the United States limited allocations to 250 kHz of spectrum for the HF broadcasters in the 4-10 MHz band. WRC-03 did not make the allocation to the HF broadcasting service that was requested. However, 50 kHz was allocated in Region 2 to the broadcasting service as a result of the realignment portions of the 7 MHz band under AI-1.23. The United States is investigating the current requirement that is needed to meet broadcasting needs. The U.S. agrees with the need for thorough and timely studies of the consequences of the current HF broadcasting mission, augmented with projections of future HF broadcasting and fixed/mobile services use. There should be a clear set of findings from the studies of the representative
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-202A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-202A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-202A1.txt
  • 5-1 (continued) (Rev.WRC-037) Reference of Article 9 Case Frequency bands (and Region) of the service for which coordination is sought Threshold/condition Calculation method Remarks No. 9.7 GSO/GSO (cont.) 3) 17.7-20.2 GHz, (Regions 2 and 3), 17.3-20.2 GHz (Region 1) and 27.5-30 GHz i) Bandwidth overlap, and ii) any network in the FSS and any associated space operation functions (see No. 1.23) with a space station within an orbital arc of ( 8° of the nominal orbital position of a proposed network in the FSS 4) 18.0-18.3 GHz i) Bandwidth overlap, and ii) any network in the FSS or MetSat service and any associated space operation functions (see No. 1.23) with a space station within an orbital arc of ( 8° of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.txt
  • additional allocations to the broadcasting service without adversely affecting, or minimally affecting, the other services within this 6 MHz since this spectrum is of value to all the services that have allocations therein. Considerable thought over the years has been given to the sharing possibilities among the services. Focusing on recent events, the CPM-02 report, for the WRC-03 Agenda Items 1.23 and 1.36, summarized the situation. Its conclusions on this matter have not been modified by the ITU-R Study Group activities since the end of WRC-03 This summarization is consistent with many ITU-R reports over the years. It states that if at all possible allocations for the broadcasting service (one way/high power) should not be made on a co-primary basis with
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1564A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1564A2.txt
  • Relative to That with Bandlimited Gaussian Noise D/U Ratio Relative to Baseline (dB) Channel Offset A3 D3 I1 J1 M1 N1 O1 G4 Mean (dB) (Excluding G4) Standard Deviation (dB) (Excluding G4) N-6 -0.87 -0.08 0.24 0.17 -0.78 -0.23 -0.54 -1.47 -0.30 0.44 N-4 -0.94 -0.1 1.92 0.04 -0.74 -0.43 -0.54 -0.87 -0.11 0.96 N-3 -0.53 -0.53 0.09 -1.13-0.52-5.44-0.53 0.49 -1.23 1.89 N-2 -0.54 -0.15 0.2 -0.09-0.05 -0.08 0.00 -0.08 -0.10 0.22 N+2 0.12 -2.37 -0.57 0.26 0.43 0.11 0.24 -1.53 -0.25 0.99 Mean -0.55 -0.65 0.38 -0.15-0.33 -1.21 -0.27 -0.69 -0.40 (-0.25) Std Dev 0.42 0.98 0.92 0.56 0.52 2.37 0.37 0.88 1.09 (0.66) Note: The overall means and standard deviations (lower right corner of the chart) exclude data for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A4.txt
  • TV-14-VTelevision 1.47 2.07 1.37 TV-MA-VTelevision 0.19 0.12 0.20 Anyofthethreeabove 3.11 4.50 2.90 Anyofthelasttwoabove 1.65 2.18 1.57 ReligiousProgramming NetworksShowingPrimarilyReligiousProgramming 1.52 7.58 0.58 "ReligiousProgramming" 3.03 11.76 1.69 OverallTargeting AverageTVContentRating(wherenotedforTV) 3.81 3.66 3.86 AverageMPAARating(wherenotedformovies) 3.96 4.00 3.95 Observations 265,388 35,448 229,940 Notes:Reportedinthetableisthepercentageofquarter-hoursofprogrammingononeof27broadcast televisionnetworks(cf.Table5)or192cabletelevisionnetworks(cf.Table27-28)between6:00p.m.and 12:00a.m.EST(ortheequivalent)duringeachofthetwoweeksperyearfor4years(cf.Table1)devoted toprogrammingofthelistedtypes.SeeSection4.2forfurtherdetailaboutthedefinitionofprogramtypes. Source:Authorcalculations. 35 Table7: ProgramAvailabilitybyProgramType 6:00p.m.-12:00a.m.EST(orequivalent),2weeks/year,2003-2006 AllBroadcast Cable Variable Networks NetworksNetworks NewsProgramming AnyNews 48.00 66.38 36.74 NetworkNews 52.81 76.26 1.23 LocalNews 47.33 63.54 39.09 PublicAffairsProgramming 56.64 40.49 61.47 MinorityProgramming NetworksTargetingBlackAudiences 20.99 - 20.99 TargetingLatinoAudiences OnNetworksTargetingLatinoAudiences 13.47 31.39 7.53 Spanish-LanguageProgramming 12.52 31.93 7.09 NetworksTargetingOtherDiverseAudiences 16.23 - 16.23 Children'sProgramming "Children'sProgramming" 38.59 37.36 38.66 GMoviesorTV-Y/TV-Y7TV 41.39 39.47 41.48 Eitheroftheabove 40.31 38.54 40.41 FamilyProgramming NetworksTargetingFamilies 53.38 - 53.38 TY-GProgramming 40.44 37.89 41.07 Arts,Educational,orDocumentaryProgramming 40.98 43.54 40.66 Eitherofthetwoabove 40.66 39.44 40.89 AdultProgramming NetworksShowingAdultProgramming - -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • 34 Same Format 101 0.03* (8.44) 0.0012163,853 0.02 (0.65) 0.0016 739 0.13 (1.55) 0.1345 335 25 Marginal Effect Z-Stat Pseudo R-Squared N Marginal Effect Z-Stat Pseudo R-Squared N Marginal Effect Z-Stat Pseudo R-Squared N # Mkts Same Format 11 0.06* (6.13) 0.0012 42,175 -0.06 (-0.95) 0.0057 156 -0.01 (-0.06) 0.1055 50 11 Same Format 20 0.07* (7.59) 0.0023 42,175 -0.06 (-1.23) 0.0104 156 -0.01 (-0.06) 0.0903 50 11 Same Format 101 0.04* (5.36) 0.0017 42,175 - - - - - - - - Source: BIA, Ownership Database (from FCC), Edison Airplay Database, Sweeting (2006) Note: Asterisk denotes statistical significance at least at the 5 percent level. Each row summarizes the results of a single regression model. The effect of ownership structure
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A7.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A7.txt
  • television station); ***p<.01, **p<.05 and *p<.10. 36 Table 4: Local News Coverage Including Sports and Weather (in seconds) Independent variables (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Local station ownership Cross-owned newspaper 46.9 (0.91) 77.2 (1.13) 50.5 (0.89) 91.6 (1.63) 78.8** (1.98) Cross-owned radio station -307.8** (2.56) -255.0** (2.16) -167.1* (1.89) -76.5 (1.20) Cross-owned radio and newspaper 124.2 (0.80) 190.1 (1.38) 143.4 (1.23) 23.0 (0.26) Parent company coverage of all television households (%) 17.3*** (3.70) 14.4*** (3.28) 3.4 (1.02) Network owned and operated -185.5* (1.70) -231.4* (1.94) -17.0 (0.18) Network affiliation (omitted category is CW\MyNetwork) ABC -16.3 (0.12) 324.1*** (3.35) CBS -74.3 (0.56) 331.6*** (3.47) FOX 333.0** (2.37) 106.6 (1.28) NBC -79.6 (0.60) 327.4*** (3.36) Other control variables Time and length of broadcast
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-448A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-448A2.txt
  • 12/5/05 1300 4.50 17 15.50 12/5/05 1305 3.00 Figure 1 Sheet 7 of 7 Valcom AM Broadcast Antenna (85 foot with Valcosphere) Operating Frequency: 1200 kHz 315 Degree Radial Point Distance Time Field Strength Desig. (km) Date (local) (mV/m) 1 0.25 11/23/05 1625 410 2 0.50 11/23/05 1615 189 3 0.75 11/23/05 1609 120 4 1.01 11/23/05 1558 93.0 5 1.23 11/23/05 1353 80.0 6 1.47 11/23/05 1359 69.0 7 1.75 11/23/05 1405 49.0 8 2.00 11/23/05 1412 37.5 9 2.48 11/23/05 1430 33.0 10 3.00 11/23/05 1435 22.2 11 3.90 11/23/05 1441 16.6 12 5.03 11/23/05 1449 6.60 13 6.00 11/23/05 1455 4.50 14 7.00 11/23/05 1504 4.60 15 8.00 11/23/05 1509 3.50 16 9.40 11/23/05 1515 3.00 17 11.60
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A2.txt
  • Reason:NochangestotheRadioRegulationsarenecessarytoenabletheintroductionofSDR andCRStechnologies.SDRandCRStechniquescanbeusedwitharangeoftechnologies,and inarangeoffrequencybandssubjecttoappropriateequipmentauthorizationproceduresto ensurethatauthorizeddevicesoperatewithinthelimitationsanadministrationappliestothe frequencybandsinwhichthesesystemsare permittedtooperate.Anydefinitionsdevelopedfor SDRandCRScouldbecapturedinanITU-RRecommendation. NOC USA/AI1.19/2 15 ARTICLE5 Frequencyallocations Reason:NochangestotheRadioRegulationsarenecessarytoenabletheintroductionofSDR andCRStechnologies.-SDRandCRStechniquescanbeusedwitharangeoftechnologies,and inarangeoffrequencybandssubjecttoappropriateequipmentauthorizationproceduresto ensurethatauthorizeddevicesoperatewithinthelimitationsanadministrationappliestothe frequencybandsinwhichthesesystemsarepermittedtooperate. 16 DOCUMENTWAC/052(Ol.09.09) UnitedStatesofAmerica DRAFTPROPOSALSFORTHEWORKOFTHECONFERENCE WRC-12AgendaItem1.22:toexaminetheeffectofemissionsfromshort-range devicesonradiocommunicationservices,inaccordancewithResolution 953(WRC-07). BACKGROUND:Resolution953(WRC-07)requeststheITU-RtostudyemissionsfromSRDs, inparticularRFIDs,insideandoutsidethefrequencybandsdesignatedintheRadioRegulations forISMapplicationstoensureadequateprotectionofradiocommunicationservices. TheUnitedStates,likemanyotheradministrations,hasadoptedaflexibleregulatoryregime, primarilyintheISMbands,thatsetsbasictechnicalrequirementsthatfacilitatespectrumsharing amonglicense-exemptdevices,includingshort-rangedevices,whileminimizingconstraintson productdesigns.Thetechnicalrequirementsplacedonthesedevicesensureadequateprotection ofradiocommunicationservicesoperatinginthesameoradjacentfrequencybands.Thisregime hasledtotheimplementationofavarietyofdevices,includingcordlesstelephones,wireless accesssystems,RFIDs,alarmsystemsandbabymonitors. Short-rangedeviceshavebeenstudiedbytheITU-Randtheresultsarecontainedin RecommendationITU-RSM.1538-2.ThisRecommendationprovidesdescriptionsofshort rangedeviceapplications,commonfrequencyrangesandregulatoryregimesadoptedbyseveral Administrations. TheUnitedStatesbelievesthattheregulationofshort-rangedevicesisprimarilyanationalmatter andthatthereisnoneedforanymodificationstotheinternationalRadioRegulationsto accommodatethesedevices. PROPOSALS: NOC USA! AI1.22/1 ARTICLE5 Frequencyallocations SectionIV-TableofFrequencyAllocations (SeeNo.2.1) Reason:Theregulationofshort-rangedevicesisprimarilyanationalmatteranddoesnotrequireany modificationstotheRadioRegulations.Thereisnoneedforinternationalregulationofsuchdevices. Technicalaspectsofthesedevices,includingfacilitatingharmonizationoffrequencybands,canbe coveredinITU-RRecommendations. 17 DOCUMENTWAC/053(Ol.09.09) UNITEDSTATESOFAMERICA DRAFTPROPOSALSFORTHEWORKOFTHECONFERENCE (Editorialnotes:RedlineinBackgroundsectionisagainsttheNTIAdraftproposal. RedlineintheProposalsectionisagainstthe2008EditionoftheRadioRegulationsandis offeredasasubstitutefortheNTIAProposalsection.) AgendaItem1.23:toconsideranallocationofabout15kHzinpartsoftheband415-526.5kHz totheamateurserviceonasecondarybasis,takingintoaccounttheneedtoprotectexisting services BackgroundInformation:Thespectrumbetween415-526.5kHziscurrentlyallocatedto themaritimemobileandaeronauticalradiolocationservices,withsomevariancesinthe allocationsamongthethreeITURegions.Themaritimemobileserviceisaprimaryuserofthe frequencybandundercOflsiderationforthisagendaitem.FootnoteNo. 5.82Aadvises,"Theuse oftheband495-505kHzislimitedtoradiotelegraphy."FootnoteNo. 5.82Badvises, "Administrationsauthorizingtheuseoffrequenciesintheband495-505kHzbyservicesother thanthemaritimemobileserviceshallensurethatnoharmfulinterferenceiscausedtothe maritimemobileserviceinthisbandortotheserviceshavingallocationsintheadjacentbands, notinginparticulartheconditionsofuseofthefrequencies490kHzand518kHz,asprescribed in Articles 31and52."NAVTEXservicesoperateon490kHzand518kHzperResolution339 (Rev.WRC-07).Thereisacommonprimarymobileserviceallocationacrossallthree Regionsintheband495-505kHz. InRegion2,theprimarymobileserviceallocation extendsto510kHz. Theband495505I(Hzprovidesinternationalharmonizationandnecessarymaritimepropagatiofl characteristicsforglobalharmoflizatioflofmaritimeservices. Themaritimecommunityalsohasemergingrequirementsforgloballyharmonizedinteroperable maritimespectruminsupportofsafetyandsecurityrequirementsifl415526.5kHz.Theband 495-505kHzwaspreviouslydesignatedformobileservicedistressandcalling.The frequencyof500kHzwasdesignatedasaninternationalcallinganddistressfrequency. Overthepasttwodecades,safetyandsecurityoperationsnear500kHzhavebeen replacedthroughtheoperationoftheGlobalMaritimeDistressSafetySystem.Asa result,designationof500kHzasaninternationaldistressandcallingfrequencywas suppressedatWRC-2000,andthebroaderdesignationof495-505kHzasadistressand callingbandwassuppressedatWRC-07. Maritimeship-to-shipandship-to-shoretelegraphynear500kHzhasdiminished,butis stillutilizedonoccasionbymaritimemobilelicenseesand,intheUnitedStates,Coast GuardAuxiliaryoperators. Worldwide,theamateurservicesuccessfullysharesspectrumasasecondaryusertothe fixedservicebetween10.100and10.150MHz. Insomecountriesaroundtheworld, includingtheUnitedStates,amateursutilizespecificchannelsbetween5.25and5.45 18 MHzassecondaryuserstothefixedandmobileservices.Theprimaryinterference avoidancetechniqueonthesebandshasbeenalisten-before-transmitprotocol, supplementedbyappropriateregulatorypowerlimitations.Thesetechniqueshaveledto successfulsharingarrangements,whichshouldbereplicableatornear500kHz. Proposal: ARTICLES Frequencyallocations SectionIV-TableofFrequencyAllocations (SeeNo. 2.1) MOD USAfAIl.23/l 495-1800kHz Allocationtoservices Region1 Region2 Region3 495-505 MOBILE5.82A Amateur 5.82B
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A3.txt
  • frameworkprovidesflexibilitytoenablenewtechnologiesandconvergenceofservices.Thisis consistentwithCPMmethodA(nochangetotheRadioRegulationsarenecessarytosatisfythe agendaitem). 14 UNITEDSTATESOFAMERICA DRAFTPROPOSALFORTHEWORKOFTHECONFERENCE AgendaItem 1.6:toreviewNo.5.565oftheRadioRegulationsinorder10updatethespectrum. uebythepassiveservicesbetween 275GHzand3000GHz,inaccordancewithResolution950 (Rev.WRC07),andtoconsiderpossibleproceduresforfree-spaceoptical-links,takinginto accounttheresultsoflTVRstudies,inaccordancewithResolution955(WRC07) BackgroundInfOiomation:Agendaitem1.6addressestwodistinctissues.Thecontentofthis proposaladdressesonlytheconsiderationofpossibleproceduresforfree-spaceopticalJinks (Resolution955(WRC-07)). Resolution955(WRC-07)considerspossibleproceduresforfree-spaceopticallinks.Freespace communicationlinksoperatingabove3000GHzhavebeeninexistenceformanyyears.No. 1005oftheAnnextotheITUConventionindicatesthatthetermradiocommunicationislimited to"electromagneticwavesoffrequenciesarbitrarilylowerthan3000GHz,propagatedinspace withoutartificialguide."In2002,thePlenipotentiaryConferenceadoptedResolution118 (Marrakesh)whichresolvesthat"worldradiocommunicationconferencescanincludeinagendas forfutureconferences,itemsrelevanttospectrumregulationoffrequenciesabove3000GHz andtakeanyappropriatemeasures,includingrevisionoftherelevantpansoftheRadio Regulations."Theoutcomeofthe2010PlenipotentiaryConferencemightaffectthisagenda itemshouldthatconferencechangeorremovetheupperlimitof3000GHzintheradiowave definition. Becauseemittersusedinnear-infrared,free-spacelinkshaveextremelynarrowbeamwidth,and terrestrialemitterscanonlycauseinterferenceoververyshortdistances,casesofterrestrial interferencewillbeveryrareandeailyresolvedonalocalbasis.Moreover,interference betweeninter-satellitelinkswouldalsoberareduetodirectedandnarrowbeamwidths,andthe vastgeometryofspace. TheITU-Rhasnotconductedstudiesrelatedtoproceduresfortheuseoffreespaceopticallink,; therefore,thereisnoneedtomodifytheRadioRegulations. Proposal: USA/AT1.6(Res.955)/J RESOLUTION955(WRC-07) Considemtionofproceduresforfree-spaceopticalJinks Reasons:Thereisnoevidencetosuggestproceduresforfreespaceoptical Iinksareneeded. 15 UNITEDSTATESOFAMERICA DRAIUSA/AT1.23/1 ARTICLE5 Frequencyallocations Reasons:NochangestoArticle5(Frequencyallocations)oftheRadioRegulationsare necessary.Themaritimecommunitysupportstheuse415-526.5kHzfortheexistingmaritime services.Thisalsomeetstheemergingrequirementsforgloballyharmonizedinteroperable maritimespectruminsupportofsafetyandsecurityrequirementsin415-526.5kHz. 16 UNITEDSTATESOFAMERICA DRAFTPROPOSALSFORTHEWORKOFTHECONFERENCE AgendaItem1.24: toconsidertheexistingallocationtothemeteorological-satelliteservicein theband7750-7850MHzwithaviewtoextendingthisallocation10theband7850-7900MHz, limitedtonon-geostationarym.eteorologicalsatellitesinthespace-to-Earthdirection.in accordancewithResolution672(WRC-07) BackgroundInfol'mation:Theestimateddataratesforthenextgenerationofnon- geostationarymeteorologicalsatellites(MetSat),circa2018-2020,areexpectedtobeonthe orderofabout225-230Mbps.ThisdataraterequiresISOMHzofspectrumtoprovidethe necessarybandwidthforthetransmissionofun-codedrawinstrumentdata.Extensionofthe current100MHzmeteorological-satelliteserviceallocationintotheband7850-7900MHz willprovideacontiguous150MHz(7750-7900)tomeetthisrequirement.Sharingwithinthe proposed50MHzextensioninvolvestheameradiocommunicationservicesthatcurrentlyshare theband7750-7850MHzwithMetSat(limitedtoNGSO)onaco-primarybasis. Compatibilityanalyses(Document7B/121Annex08)performedbyWP7BbetweenMetSatand fixedserviceconcludedthatthepotentialextensionband7850-7900MHzcanbesharedunder thesameconditionsasthecurrent7750-7850MHzallocation. PI'oposal: ARTICLES Frequencyallocations Scction IV-TablcofFrcqucncyAllocations (SeeNo.2.1) MOD USNAII.24/1 7250-8500MHz Allocationtoservices Region1 I Region2 I Region3 7750-+-&Sll7900 FIXED METEOROLOGfCAL-SATELLlTE(space-to-Earth)M.Q.Q..5.461B MOBILEexceptaeronauticalmobile 78.07900 FIXED MOlOlbl;;e"eept.erana",i"alme.il" MOD USA/AI1.24/2 17 5.4618Theuseoftheband7 900MHzbythemeteorological-satelliteservice (space-to-Earth)islimitedtonon-geostationarysatellitesystems. Reasons:ToextendthecurrentMetSatallocationby50MHzto7900MHzwithconsequential changetothefootnote. 18
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2628A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2628A1.pdf
  • 24.55 percent and 5.58 percent of its total capital stock, respectively. As discussed above, only 260 of the foreign-owned voting shares have an address in a non-WTO Member country, which constitutes a de minimis amount (<0.01 percent of TerreStar Corp.'s total capital stock). The shares of voting, common stock for which Broadridge could not obtain the beneficial owner's address constitute 1.23 percent of TerreStar Corp.'s total capital stock, which we treat as non-WTO Member investment. Based on the ownership information submitted by TerreStar Corp., we find it reasonable to conclude that at least 75 percent of its voting and equity interests are held by individuals that are citizens of, or entities that have their principal places of business in, the United
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2628A1_Rcd.pdf
  • constitutes 24.55 percent and 5.58 percent of its total capital stock, respectively. As discussed above, only 260 of the foreign-owned voting shares have an address in a non-WTO Member country, which constitutes a de minimisamount (<0.01 percent of TerreStar Corp.'s total capital stock).54 The shares of voting, common stock for which Broadridge could not obtain the beneficial owner's address constitute 1.23 percent of TerreStar Corp.'s total capital stock, which we treat as non-WTO Member investment.55 19. Based on theownership information submitted by TerreStar Corp., we find it reasonable to conclude that at least 75 percent of its voting and equity interests are held by individuals that are citizens of, or entities that have their principal places of business in, the United
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-38A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-38A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-38A1.txt
  • This waiver is subject to possible revisions in light of decisions the Commission may adopt in pending proceedings on adjacent-band AWS services. Radiated Power Section 25.252(a)(2) of the Commission's rules states that a license application for 2 GHz ATC base stations must demonstrate that they will generate no more than 27 dBW (approximately 501 watts) EIRP within a bandwidth of 1.23 megahertz. ICO requests waiver of this rule to allow its ATC base stations to generate up to 32 dBW (approximately 1585 watts) EIRP per megahertz of bandwidth, which is approximately equivalent to an EIRP of 32.9 dBW (1950 watts) in a 1.23 megahertz bandwidth. ICO maintains that granting this waiver request would enable it to provide ATC services with fewer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-763A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-763A2.txt
  • As such, the United States does not believe that changes to the Radio Regulations are needed to address this agenda item. The United States supports studies into the characteristics of short-range devices, including emissions and the effects of those emissions on radiocommunication services. (August 7, 2008) 39 Document WAC/029(31.03.09) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DRAFT PRELIMINARY VIEWS ON WRC-11 AGENDA ITEM 1.23: to consider an allocation of about 15 kHz in parts of the band 415- 526.5 kHz to the amateur service on a secondary basis, taking into account the need to protect existing services ISSUE: Whether to allocate spectrum on a secondary basis to the amateur service between 415-526 kHz, and, if so, to determine how to protect existing services in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2060A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2060A2.txt
  • of Article 9 Case Frequency bands (and Region) of the service for which coordination is sought Threshold/condition Calculation method Remarks 1) 3 400-4 200 MHz 5 725-5 850 MHz (Region 1) and 5 850-6 725 MHz 7 025-7 075 MHz i) Bandwidth overlap, and ii) any network in the fixed-satellite service (FSS) and any associated space operation functions (see No. 1.23) with a space station within an orbital arc of ±106° of the nominal orbital position of a proposed network in the FSS No. 9.7 GSO/GSO A station in a satellite network using the geostationary-satellite orbit (GSO), in any space radiocommunication service, in a frequency band and in a Region where this service is not subject to a Plan, in respect
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2060A2_Rcd.pdf
  • (and Region) of the service for which coordination is sought Threshold/condition Calculat ion method Remarks 1) 3 400-4 200 MHz 5 725-5 850 MHz (Regi on 1) and 5 850-6 725 MHz 7 025-7 075 MHz i) Bandwidth overlap, and ii) any ne twork in t he fi xed-sat ellite service (FSS) and any associated space operation functions (see No. 1.23 ) with a space s tation within an orbital arc of ±10 6° of the no minal orbit al pos ition of a pr opose d network in the FSS No. 9.7 GSO/GS O A station in a satellite networ k us ing the geos tationary-satel lite orbi t (GSO), in any space radio com municati on service , in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-60A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-60A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-60A1.txt
  • waivers will serve the public interest by enabling TerreStar to operate more efficiently and provide more valuable service. Below, we address each technical waiver request in turn. Radiated Power The Commission's rules require an applicant for 2 GHz ATC base stations to demonstrate that they will generate no more than 27 dBW (approximately 501 watts) EIRP within a bandwidth of 1.23 megahertz. TerreStar requests waiver of this limit to allow its ATC base stations to generate a peak EIRP of 32 dBW (approximately 1640 watts), independent of bandwidth. We recently waived the same rule provision to allow New DBSD ATC base stations to transmit with EIRP power spectral density up to 32 dBW/MHz. In so doing, we indicated that this waiver
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-60A1_Rcd.pdf
  • the waivers will serve the public interest by enabling TerreStar to operate more efficiently and provide more valuable service.68Below, we address each technical waiver request in turn. 23. Radiated PowerThe Commission's rules require an applicant for 2 GHz ATC base stations to demonstrate that they will generate no more than 27 dBW (approximately 501 watts) EIRP within a bandwidth of 1.23 megahertz.69TerreStar requests waiver of this limit to allow its ATC base stations to generate a peak EIRP of 32 dBW (approximately 1640 watts), independent of bandwidth.70 24. We recently waived the same rule provision to allow New DBSD ATC base stations to transmit with EIRP power spectral density up to 32 dBW/MHz.71In so doing, we indicated that this 61Waiver Request
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-447A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-447A2.txt
  • that e-Navigation would require global harmonization of data communications systems. IMO technical bodies have identified that countries could not deploy e-Navigation without an ITU review of the Radio Regulations, to accommodate advanced maritime communication systems. This proposal does not prejudice United States proposals for the work of WRC-07 affecting the maritime services, including, without limitation, Agenda Items 1.9, 1.10, and 1.23. Proposal: MOD USA/8.2 /1 RESOLUTION 806 (REV. WRC-0712) Preliminary aAgenda for the 2015 World Radiocommunication Conference The World Radiocommunication Conference (Geneva, 20072012), Reasons: To modify the agenda for WRC-15 to add a new item. ADD USA/8.2/2 2.XYZ to consider regulatory changes to support implementation of e-Navigation within the maritime mobile service and any possible regulatory action, as necessary, to support
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-447A2_Rcd.pdf
  • that e-Navigation would require global harmonization of data communications systems. IMO technical bodies have identified that countries could not deploy e-Navigation without an ITU review of the Radio Regulations, to accommodate advanced maritime communication systems. This proposal does not prejudice United States proposals for the work of WRC-07 affecting the maritime services, including, without limitation, Agenda Items 1.9, 1.10, and 1.23. Proposal: MOD USA/8.2 /1 RESOLUTION 806 (REV. WRC-0712) Preliminary aAgenda for the 2015 World Radiocommunication Conference The World Radiocommunication Conference (Geneva, 20072012), Reasons: To modify the agenda for WRC-15 to add a new item. ADD USA/8.2/2 2.XYZ to consider regulatory changes to support implementation of e-Navigation within the maritime mobile service and any possible regulatory action, as necessary, to support
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-121A2_Rcd.pdf
  • 0.00 SC 1,383 155 104 40 15 13,091 934 0.00 124.81 1,503.11 49.01 0.01 0.72 0.00 305.01 0.98 SD 1,302 46 31 26 7 5,146 5,174 0.00 195.42 2,699.11 394.03 0.04 2.55 0.00 207.43 0.87 TN 5,801 323 214 79 14 37,709 2,062 0.02 377.20 3,308.25 350.85 0.49 5.91 0.00 219.38 23.22 TX 34,162 463 301 169 32 105,535 45,616 1.23 2,281.64 74,088.10 3,157.82 7.69 13.60 2.03 4,465.96 14.38 UT 10,939 93 61 29 8 5,628 25,311 71.66 804.00 26,172.16 3,340.78 13.72 66.91 0.00 387.06 1.00 VA 9,754 404 233 82 22 61,714 3,511 25.68 764.45 6,482.70 2,897.81 0.92 2.83 0.18 917.27 157.69 VT 5,051 187 93 14 3 44,902 1,878 8.95 503.94 3,008.96 180.11 0.74 0.76 0.00 364.53 12.52 WA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.txt
  • Effect of LPFM Entry on the Ratings of Full-Service Commercial FM Stations in all Radio Markets: Format Competition Independent Variable Contour Measure Market Measure Contour/ Market Measure Number of LPFM stations 0.000 (0.31) 0.002 (1.22) -0.007 (2.27)* Number of similar format AM stations in market 0.001 (0.48) 0.001 (0.50) 0.001 (0.46) Number of similar format FM stations in market -0.001 (1.23) -0.001 (1.32) -0.001 (1.14) Number of similar format non-commercial stations in market -0.000 (0.02) 0.000 (0.09) -0.000 (0.12) Number of commercial TV stations in market -0.001 (0.36) -0.002 (0.48) -0.001 (0.20) Digital radio stations in market 0.000 (0.45) 0.000 (0.24) 0.000 (0.74) Retail expenditures in market -0.000 (0.72) -0.000 (0.81) -0.000 (0.53) Population density of market 0.000 (0.16) 0.000 (0.17)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-104945A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-104945A1.txt
  • have returned to the respective companies data for which confidential treatment was sought. 16030 Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-158 TABLE 1 Ratio of costs of standard analog service to BRI ISDN service Ameritech Bell Atlantic NYNEX Pacific Bell US West Average ratio of costs Outside Plant (loop only) costs 1:1.07 1:1.01 1:0.85 1:1.05 1:0.80 1:0.96* All NTS costs 1:1.45 1:1.36 1:1.23 1:1.13 1:1.07 1:1.24* TABLE 2 Ratio of costs of standard analog service to PRI ISDN service Ameritech Bell Atlantic NYNEX Pacific Bell US West Average ratio of costs Outside Plant (loop only) costs 1:5.68 1:4.13 1:10.94 1:4.67 1:5.33 1:6.5* Outside Plant (loop only) costs (excluding NYNEX data) 1:5.68 1:4.13 excluded 1:4.67 1:5.33 1:4.95* All NTS costs 1:8.9 1:15.80 1:27.74 1:8.70
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-204216A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-204216A1.txt
  • Fixed Earth Stations Nature of Service:Mobile Satellite Service 31 ° 47 ' 57.50 " N LAT. SITE ID: CLFN-2 Route 2, Box 149AA, Bosque, Clifton, TX 97 ° 36 ' 44.70 " W LONG. LOCATION: Alcatel Clift-RFT2 5.5 meters ANTENNA ID: 9775 55.00 dBW Waveform consists of multiple direct-sequence spread-spectrum channels whose carriers are uniformly spaced. Each CDMA channel is 1.23 Mc/sec. Each CDMA Waveform is QPSK. 5096.0000 - 5250.0000 MHz 1M23G7W Waveform consists of multiple direct-sequence spread-spectrum channels whose carriers are uniformly spaced. Each CDMA channel is 1.23 Mc/sec. Each CDMA Waveform is QPSK. 6900.0000 - 7055.0000 MHz 1M23G7W 59.00 dBW Unmodulated CW for Testing. 5096.0000 - 5250.0000 MHz 50K0N0N Unmodulated CW for Testing. 6900.0000 - 7055.0000 MHz 50K0N0N 59.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • 4.71 3.10 16.17 10/01/85 05/31/86 4.33 4.33 3.10 15.38 06/01/86 12/31/86 3.04 4.33 3.10 14.00 01/01/87 06/30/87 1.55 4.33 3.10 12.41 07/01/87 12/31/87 0.69 4.33 3.10 11.49 01/01/88 11/30/88 0.00 4.14 3.10 10.56 12/01/88 02/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/89 03/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A8.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A8.txt
  • Size Notes: Log scales for population on the horizontal axis and the number of outlets in each medium on the vertical axis. See text for explanation. Table 1: Television Outlets, 1994-2000 year N uhf vhf uhf+vhf network indep. public net+ind+pub 1994 207 2.29 2.63 2.46 1995 207 2.96 2.29 5.25 2.72 2.52 1.71 6.96 1996 207 3.09 2.34 5.43 4.20 1.23 1.71 7.14 1997 207 3.19 2.35 5.54 4.29 1.25 1.71 7.25 1998 207 3.37 2.37 5.74 4.74 1.40 1.72 7.87 1999 207 3.54 2.37 5.91 4.94 1.46 2000 207 3.65 2.39 6.04 5.02 1.57 1.73 8.32 linked sample year N uhf vhf uhf+vhf network indep. public net+ind+pub 1994 2.64 2.88 3.33 1995 143 3.76 2.63 6.38 3.01 3.37 2.04 8.42
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.txt
  • 0.19 -37.6 China 2.02 1.80 1.54 1.47 1.28 1.14 0.90 0.73 0.48 0.29 0.24 -79.0 Colombia 1.15 1.07 1.01 1.00 0.84 0.89 0.77 0.65 0.43 0.26 0.21 -77.0 Dominican Republic 0.97 0.98 0.83 0.84 0.70 0.57 0.45 0.27 0.25 0.20 0.15 -73.9 Egypt 1.33 1.35 1.27 1.25 1.04 1.03 0.97 0.81 0.70 0.44 0.28 -73.3 El Salvador 1.19 1.24 1.20 1.23 1.17 1.08 0.81 0.69 0.60 0.32 0.28 -74.2 France 1.04 0.99 0.91 0.81 0.62 0.63 0.50 0.35 0.41 0.33 0.22 -65.4 Germany 1.08 1.05 0.95 0.88 0.65 0.50 0.40 0.37 0.33 0.38 0.29 -43.2 Greece 1.17 1.14 1.07 1.10 0.99 0.97 0.80 0.61 0.62 0.25 0.27 -71.7 Guatemala 1.18 1.19 1.15 1.17 1.07 1.00 0.83 0.66 0.63 0.38 0.33 -67.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255118A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255118A1.txt
  • greater chance of surviving in any given year. 24 TABLE 7 SEMI-PARAMETRIC SURVIVAL ESTIMATES (Z-statistics in parentheses) Cox Proportional Hazard (With Stratification by Sports and Shopping Genres) Piecewise-Constant Hazard (No Stratification) Millions of Subs -0.06*** (4.96) -0.17*** (6.73) Missing Subs -0.51** (2.21) -2.10** (2.12) Vertical Integration 0.00 (0.07) -0.01 (1.15) Spinoff -1.21** (2.40) -1.50*** (2.95) Missing Vertical or Spinoff 0.26 (1.23) -0.22 (1.22) Born before 1984 -0.74 (1.62) -1.08** (2.01) Duration 2 years -1.03*** (3.91) Duration 3 years -0.93*** (3.36) Duration 4 years -0.49* (1.91) Duration 5 years -0.82** (2.43) Duration 6 years -1.92*** (3.23) Duration 7 years -0.44 (1.25) Duration 8 years -0.60 (1.36) Duration 10 years -0.47 (3.47) Duration 12 years -0.35 (0.55) Duration 13 years -1.03 (0.98) Duration
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-259475A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-259475A1.txt
  • 7055.0000 MHz 1M23XXX 59.00 dBW White noise modulated carrier for testing 5096.0000 - 5250.0000 MHz 1M23XXX Direct-sequence CDMA for single-carrier telemetry data 6900.0000 - 7055.0000 MHz 2M50G2D Direct-sequence CDMA for single-carrier AMSS 6900.0000 - 7055.0000 MHz 1M23G2W 55.00 dBW Direct-sequence CDMA for single-carrier AMSS 5096.0000 - 5250.0000 MHz 1M23G2W CDMA voice and data: QPSK waveform consists of multiple direct-sequence spread-spectrum 1.23 Mchip/sec channels whose carriers are uniformly spaced. 6900.0000 - 7055.0000 MHz 1M23G7W Page 5 of 21 55.00 dBW CDMA voice and data: QPSK waveform consists of multiple direct-sequence spread-spectrum 1.23 Mchip/sec channels whose carriers are uniformly spaced. 5096.0000 - 5250.0000 MHz 1M23G7W Points of Communication: SBRG-1 - GLOBALSTAR - (NGSO) E050098 SES-LIC-20050617-00769E Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Application for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260489A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260489A1.txt
  • is 59.0 dBW in any bandwidth. 5096.0000 - 5250.0000 MHz 1H0N0N White noise modulated carrier for testing 6900.0000 - 7055.0000 MHz 1M23XXX 59.00 dBW White noise modulated carrier for testing 5096.0000 - 5250.0000 MHz 1M23XXX Direct-sequence CDMA for single-carrier AMSS 6900.0000 - 7055.0000 MHz 1M23G2W Page 1 of 36 CDMA voice and data: QPSK waveform consists of multiple direct-sequence spread-spectrum 1.23 Mchip/sec channels whose carriers are uniformly spaced. 6900.0000 - 7055.0000 MHz 1M23G7W 55.00 dBW CDMA voice and data: QPSK waveform consists of multiple direct-sequence spread-spectrum 1.23 Mchip/sec channels whose carriers are uniformly spaced. 5096.0000 - 5250.0000 MHz 1M23G7W Direct-sequence CDMA for single-carrier telemetry data 6900.0000 - 7055.0000 MHz 2M50G2D 55.00 dBW Direct-sequence CDMA for single-carrier AMSS 5096.0000 - 5250.0000 MHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260585A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260585A1.txt
  • of Service:Domestic Mobile-Satellite Service, Mobile Satellite Service Modification requests to add new emission designator and related service. 17 ° 58 ' 50.00 " N LAT. SITE ID: LPMA-3 ROAD 303 INT. KM 12.1, Caba Rojo, CABO ROJO, PR 67 ° 8 ' 13.00 " W LONG. LOCATION: Alcatel 5.5M 5.5 meters ANTENNA ID: 9775 FEEDER LINK & TELEMETRY - CDMA 1.23 MC/SEC/QPSK 6900.0000 - 7055.0000 MHz 1M23G7W Page 2 of 25 55.00 dBW FEEDER LINK & TELEMETRY - CDMA 1.23 MC/SEC/QPSK 5091.0000 - 5250.0000 MHz 1M23G7W CDMA VOICE AND DATA 6900.0000 - 7055.0000 MHz 1M23G7W UNMODULATED CW FOR TESTING 6900.0000 - 7055.0000 MHz NON 55.00 dBW CDMA VOICE AND DATA 5096.0000 - 5250.0000 MHz 1M23G7W WHITE NOISE MODULATED CARRIER FOR TESTING
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.txt
  • 0.19 0.16 -48.4 China 1.80 1.54 1.47 1.28 1.14 0.90 0.73 0.48 0.29 0.24 0.18 -80.5 Colombia 1.07 1.01 1.00 0.84 0.89 0.77 0.65 0.43 0.26 0.21 0.11 -85.2 Dominican Republic 0.98 0.83 0.84 0.70 0.57 0.45 0.27 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.16 -64.7 Egypt 1.35 1.27 1.25 1.04 1.03 0.97 0.81 0.70 0.44 0.28 0.21 -78.8 El Salvador 1.24 1.20 1.23 1.17 1.08 0.81 0.69 0.60 0.32 0.28 0.13 -84.3 France 0.99 0.91 0.81 0.62 0.63 0.50 0.35 0.41 0.33 0.22 0.25 -50.0 Germany 1.05 0.95 0.88 0.65 0.50 0.40 0.37 0.33 0.38 0.29 0.31 -22.1 Greece 1.14 1.07 1.10 0.99 0.97 0.80 0.61 0.62 0.25 0.27 0.23 -71.6 Guatemala 1.19 1.15 1.17 1.07 1.00 0.83 0.66 0.63 0.38 0.33 0.21
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261673A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261673A1.txt
  • EIRP density per carrier is 59.0 dBW in any bandwidth. 5096.0000 - 5250.0000 MHz 1H0N0N White noise modulated carrier for testing 6900.0000 - 7055.0000 MHz 1M23XXX 59.00 dBW White noise modulated carrier for testing 5096.0000 - 5250.0000 MHz 1M23XXX Direct-sequence CDMA for single-carrier AMSS 6900.0000 - 7055.0000 MHz 1M23G2W CDMA voice and data: QPSK waveform consists of multiple direct-sequence spread-spectrum 1.23 Mchip/sec channels whose carriers are uniformly spaced. 6900.0000 - 7055.0000 MHz 1M23G7W 55.00 dBW CDMA voice and data: QPSK waveform consists of multiple direct-sequence spread-spectrum 1.23 Mchip/sec channels whose carriers are uniformly spaced. 5096.0000 - 5250.0000 MHz 1M23G7W Direct-sequence CDMA for single-carrier telemetry data 6900.0000 - 7055.0000 MHz 2M50G2D Page 2 of 23 55.00 dBW Direct-sequence CDMA for single-carrier AMSS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262488A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262488A1.txt
  • MHz N0N White noise modulated carrier for testing 6900.0000 - 7055.0000 MHz 1M23XXX 59.00 dBW White noise modulated carrier for testing 5096.0000 - 5250.0000 MHz 1M23XXX Direct-sequence CDMA for single-carrier telemetry data 6900.0000 - 7055.0000 MHz 2M50G2D 55.00 dBW Direct-sequence CDMA for single-carrier AMSS 5096.0000 - 5250.0000 MHz 1M23G2W CDMA voice and data: QPSK waveform consists of multiple direct-sequence spread-spectrum 1.23 Mchip/sec channels whose carriers are uniformly spaced. 6900.0000 - 7055.0000 MHz 1M23G7W Direct-sequence CDMA for single-carrier AMSS 6900.0000 - 7055.0000 MHz 1M23G2W 55.00 dBW CDMA voice and data: QPSK waveform consists of multiple direct-sequence spread-spectrum 1.23 Mchip/sec channels whose carriers are uniformly spaced. 5096.0000 - 5250.0000 MHz 1M23G7W Points of Communication: WSLA-3 - GLOBALSTAR - (NGSO) E050346 SES-LIC-20051122-01632E Class of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • High-Cost Support Mechanisms ­ Monthly Support per Loop by State .............. Table 3.16 Income - Net ........................................................................................................... Table 11.5 Information for Allocating CLEC Revenues .............................................. Table 1.19 Information for Allocating Incumbent Local Exchange Revenues .....................Table 1.18 Information for Allocating Interstate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.22 Information for Allocating Interstate Toll ...................................................Table 1.26 Information for Allocating Intrastate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.23 Information for Allocating LEC Intrastate Toll ............................................ Table 1.24 Information for Allocating Mobile Wireless Revenues .................................. Table 1.20 Information for Allocating Non-LEC Intrastate Toll ......................................Table 1.25 Information for Allocating SLC Revenues ................................................. Table 1.21 Installation, Maintenance, and Customer Complaints ............................................ Table 9.1 Interstate Access Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 3.12 Interstate Access Support Payments by Study Area
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A13.txt
  • (0.71) SBC - Ameritech - Indiana Bell IN 42,341 42,505 (163) (0.38) Sprint - United Tel Company of Indiana IN (21) (2) (19) 90.48 Iowa Telecom - Iowa IA 54 42 11 20.37 Iowa Telecom - Iowa North IA 71 57 15 21.13 Iowa Telecom - Iowa System IA 44 34 10 22.73 Qwest - Iowa IA 19,144 19,379 (235) (1.23) SBC - Southwestern Bell - Kansas KS 1,855 1,902 (47) (2.53) ALLTEL Kentucky, Inc. - London KY (70) (54) (16) 22.86 ALLTEL Kentucky, Inc. - Lexington KY (352) (263) (89) 25.28 Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company - Kentucky KY 43 32 0 0.00 BellSouth - Kentucky KY (17,188) (17,291) 103 (0.60) BellSouth - Louisiana LA (17,608) (17,859) 251 (1.43) Verizon -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A2.txt
  • High-Cost Support Mechanisms ­ Monthly Support per Loop by State .............. Table 3.16 Income - Net ........................................................................................................... Table 11.5 Information for Allocating CLEC Revenues .............................................. Table 1.19 Information for Allocating Incumbent Local Exchange Revenues .....................Table 1.18 Information for Allocating Interstate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.22 Information for Allocating Interstate Toll ...................................................Table 1.26 Information for Allocating Intrastate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.23 Information for Allocating LEC Intrastate Toll ............................................ Table 1.24 Information for Allocating Mobile Wireless Revenues .................................. Table 1.20 Information for Allocating Non-LEC Intrastate Toll ......................................Table 1.25 Information for Allocating SLC Revenues ................................................. Table 1.21 Installation, Maintenance, and Customer Complaints ............................................ Table 9.1 Interstate Access Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 3.12 Interstate Access Support Payments by Study Area
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A3.txt
  • adjustment formula presented in Table 1.17. Revenues for allocation are the difference between gross access revenues for allocation and subscriber line charge revenues. Allocation percentages in each state are the ratio of the state's allocation revenues to nationwide revenues. Access revenues by type are determined by multiplying the allocation factors by the type of revenues (see Table 1.14). In Table 1.23, intrastate access revenues are allocated between states based on intrastate access revenues from Table 2.11 of the 2003/2004 Statistics of Communications Common Carriers. Intrastate access revenues for allocation are the product of these access revenues and the adjustment formula in Table 1.17. Allocation percentage in each state is the ratio of the state's allocation revenues to nationwide revenues. Access revenues
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.txt
  • 10.00 9.96 13.45 13.50 13.46 Virginia 7.16 8.25 7.62 1.76 3.50 3.36 0.88 1.75 1.68 8.04 10.00 9.30 9.80 13.50 12.66 Washington 6.20 8.25 7.93 0.00 3.50 1.90 0.00 1.75 0.95 6.20 10.00 8.88 6.20 13.50 10.78 West Virginia 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 2.64 0.00 1.75 1.32 8.25 10.00 9.57 8.25 13.50 12.20 Wisconsin 6.82 8.25 7.24 0.00 3.50 1.23 0.00 1.75 0.61 6.82 10.00 7.85 6.82 13.50 9.08 Wyoming 8.25 8.25 8.25 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 10.00 10.00 10.00 13.50 13.50 13.50 Nationwide $3.50 $8.25 $7.26 $0.00 $8.45 $2.67 $0.00 $1.75 $1.29 $3.50 $10.00 $8.55 $3.50 $18.45 $11.22 NA - Not Available. Note: This table reflects only non-tribal support. 1 Basic federal support includes both Tier 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.06 0.45 0.03 0.64 Georgia 0.71 0.01 0.00 0.16 0.46 0.27 0.26 1.87 Guam 3.41 0.00 0.00 0.65 1.10 0.00 0.00 5.16 Hawaii 0.51 (0.00) 0.00 0.01 0.47 0.24 0.13 1.36 Idaho 2.40 0.01 0.00 0.21 0.74 1.80 0.90 6.06 Illinois 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.55 Indiana 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.22 0.56 0.19 1.23 Iowa 0.72 0.05 0.00 0.23 1.13 0.28 1.05 3.47 Kansas 3.26 0.03 0.00 0.29 1.42 0.38 0.67 6.06 Kentucky 0.69 0.01 0.62 0.10 0.47 0.64 0.18 2.70 Louisiana 1.92 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.58 0.34 0.22 3.39 Maine 0.76 0.00 0.18 0.28 0.69 0.03 0.70 2.64 Maryland 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.06 Massachusetts 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A8.txt
  • Vermont 1986 3.50 75.3% 84.6% 93.4% 9.3% * 8.9%* 91.5% 93.9% 96.9% 2.4% 3.0% Virginia 1988 3.36 80.4% 84.7% 87.3% 4.3% 2.7% 93.2% 93.6% 94.3% 0.5% 0.6% Washington 1987 1.90 82.7% 89.0% 87.5% 6.3% * -1.6% 92.9% 96.1% 94.9% 3.2% * -1.2% West Virginia 1986 2.64 75.7% 83.8% 91.6% 8.1% * 7.8%* 87.3% 93.6% 94.6% 6.3% * 1.0% Wisconsin 1991 1.23 88.4% 87.8% 92.5% -0.6% 4.7% 96.0% 96.4% 96.0% 0.4% -0.3% Wyoming 1991 3.50 74.2% 89.5% 88.7% 15.2% * -0.8% 89.2% 94.9% 95.8% 5.7% * 0.9% Households with income under $10,000 expressed in March 1984 dollars. * Increase is statistically significant at the 95% confidence level. # Decrease is statistically significant at the 95% confidence level. Note: Changes may not appear
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.txt
  • 3.94 4.12 3.97 Total Monthly Charge 17.70 18.18 18.11 19.05 19.24 19.77 19.72 19.95 19.81 20.01 19.95 19.88 19.76 19.93 20.78 22.62 24.07 24.52 24.31 Basic Connection Charge 45.63 44.04 42.94 43.06 43.06 42.00 41.50 41.38 41.28 40.91 41.11 41.04 41.24 41.26 41.45 40.02 39.83 39.22 39.26 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 1.34 1.31 1.55 1.76 1.77 1.27 1.22 1.23 0.85 0.23 0.23 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 **** **** **** Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.59 Additional Charge If
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264049A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264049A1.pdf
  • amended (``Act''), to 2by2security.com for violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. 2. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that on February 1, 2006, 2by2security.com, on its website, marketed unauthorized radio devices, specifically five models of 900MHz to 1.23 GHz wireless cameras, models LJ109, LJ129, LJ117, LJ118 and LJ119, and associated receivers, which have not been certificated for sale or use in the United States. 3. Section 302(b) of the Act provides that ``[n]o person shall manufacture, import, sell, offer for sale, or ship devices or home electronic equipment and systems, or use devices, which fail to comply with
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • Total Monthly Charge $17.70 $18.18 $18.11 $19.05 $19.24 $19.77 $19.72 $19.95 $19.81 $20.01 $19.95 $19.88 $19.76 $19.93 $20.78 $22.62 $24.07 $24.52 $24.52 $24.74 Basic Connection Charge 4 45.63 44.04 42.94 43.06 43.06 42.00 41.50 41.38 41.28 40.91 41.11 41.04 41.24 41.26 41.45 40.02 39.83 39.22 39.26 39.30 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.34 1.31 1.55 1.76 1.77 1.27 1.22 1.23 0.85 0.23 0.23 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 a4 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71 $42.71
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • Jurisdiction ..................................................... Table 3.20 ILEC Loops - by Study Area ............................................................... Table 3.34 Income - Net ........................................................................................................... Table 11.5 Information for Allocating CLEC Revenues .............................................. Table 1.19 Information for Allocating Incumbent Local Exchange Revenues .....................Table 1.18 Information for Allocating Interstate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.22 Information for Allocating Interstate Toll ...................................................Table 1.26 Information for Allocating Intrastate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.23 Information for Allocating LEC Intrastate Toll ............................................ Table 1.24 Information for Allocating Mobile Wireless Revenues .................................. Table 1.20 Information for Allocating Non-LEC Intrastate Toll ......................................Table 1.25 Information for Allocating SLC Revenues ................................................. Table 1.21 Installation, Maintenance, and Customer Complaints ............................................ Table 9.1 3 Index of Tables and Charts Interstate Access Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 3.12 Interstate
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A13.txt
  • - Contel Nevada NV (36) (22) (14) 38.89 AT&T - Pacific Telesis - Nevada Bell NV 457 512 (54) (11.82) Table 11.10 Total Non-Operating Items ($000) - 2005 11 - 21 Study Area State Code Subject to Separations Interstate Intrastate Percent Interstate Verizon New England - New Hampshire NH ($29) $656 ($686) 2,365.52 Verizon New Jersey NJ 83,364 84,389 (1,025) (1.23) Sprint - United Telephone Company of New Jersey NJ (396) (304) (91) 22.98 Qwest - New Mexico NM (10,379) (10,197) (183) 1.76 Valor Telecommunications of Texas - New Mexico 1 NM 231 231 0 0.00 Valor Telecommunications of Texas - New Mexico 2 NM 0 0 0 0.00 Citizens Telecom. of New York - Red Hook NY 0 0 0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A2.txt
  • Jurisdiction ..................................................... Table 3.20 ILEC Loops - by Study Area ............................................................... Table 3.34 Income - Net ........................................................................................................... Table 11.5 Information for Allocating CLEC Revenues .............................................. Table 1.19 Information for Allocating Incumbent Local Exchange Revenues .....................Table 1.18 Information for Allocating Interstate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.22 Information for Allocating Interstate Toll ...................................................Table 1.26 Information for Allocating Intrastate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.23 Information for Allocating LEC Intrastate Toll ............................................ Table 1.24 Information for Allocating Mobile Wireless Revenues .................................. Table 1.20 Information for Allocating Non-LEC Intrastate Toll ......................................Table 1.25 Information for Allocating SLC Revenues ................................................. Table 1.21 Installation, Maintenance, and Customer Complaints ............................................ Table 9.1 3 Index of Tables and Charts Interstate Access Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 3.12 Interstate
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A3.txt
  • The rates of NECA pool carriers and rate-of-return carriers are assumed to be $9.20 per line per month for multiline business. 1 -12 Allocation percentages in each state are the ratio of the state's allocation revenues to nationwide revenues. Access revenues by type are determined by multiplying the allocation factors by the type of revenues (see Table 1.14). In Table 1.23, intrastate access revenues are allocated between states based on intrastate access revenues from Table 2.11 of the 2004/2005 Statistics of Communications Common Carriers. Intrastate access revenues for allocation are the product of these access revenues and the adjustment formula in Table 1.17. Allocation percentage in each state is the ratio of the state's allocation revenues to nationwide revenues. Access revenues
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.txt
  • 13.50 12.97 American Samoa 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25 Arizona 8.05 8.25 8.20 0.00 3.50 2.76 0.00 1.75 1.38 8.05 10.00 9.58 8.05 13.50 12.34 Arkansas 5.25 8.25 7.47 0.00 3.50 0.71 0.00 1.75 0.35 5.25 10.00 7.82 5.25 13.50 8.53 California 3.97 8.25 6.63 0.00 3.50 2.46 0.00 1.75 1.23 3.97 10.00 7.85 3.97 13.50 10.31 Colorado 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 3.49 0.00 1.75 1.75 8.25 10.00 10.00 8.25 13.50 13.49 Connecticut 6.10 7.46 7.46 1.18 1.18 1.18 0.59 0.59 0.59 6.69 8.05 8.05 7.87 9.23 9.23 Delaware 8.17 8.17 8.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.17 8.17 8.17 8.17 8.17 8.17 District of Columbia 5.59 5.59 5.59
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 South Carolina 0.96 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.16 0.49 0.18 2.82 South Dakota 4.41 0.08 0.00 0.34 0.00 3.95 0.02 2.05 10.86 Tennessee 0.34 (0.00) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.24 0.17 1.28 Texas 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 (0.00) 0.45 0.27 0.13 1.56 Utah 0.52 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.67 0.18 0.29 1.67 Vermont 1.23 0.00 0.00 1.66 0.00 1.52 0.39 0.87 5.67 Virgin Islands 17.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.82 0.00 0.00 27.05 Virginia 0.05 (0.00) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 1.04 0.09 1.30 Washington 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 (0.00) 0.43 0.61 0.15 1.66 West Virginia 1.01 0.01 0.00 1.72 0.00 0.14 1.28 0.16 4.33 Wisconsin 0.67 0.03 0.08 0.00 0.01 1.22 0.01 0.56 2.57
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 4.19 Total Monthly Charge 17.70 18.18 18.11 19.05 19.24 19.77 19.72 19.95 19.81 20.01 19.95 19.88 19.76 19.93 20.78 22.62 24.07 24.52 24.52 24.74 Basic Connection Charge 45.63 44.04 42.94 43.06 43.06 42.00 41.50 41.38 41.28 40.91 41.11 41.04 41.24 41.26 41.45 40.02 39.83 39.22 39.26 39.30 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 1.34 1.31 1.55 1.76 1.77 1.27 1.22 1.23 0.85 0.23 0.23 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 **** **** **** **** Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71 42.71
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269409A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269409A1.txt
  • modulated carrier for testing 6900.0000 - 7025.0000 MHz 1M23XXX Page 3 of 31 59.00 dBW White noise modulated carrier for testing 5096.0000 - 5250.0000 MHz 1M23XXX Direct-sequence CDMA for single-carrier telemetry data 6900.0000 - 7025.0000 MHz 2M50G2D 55.00 dBW Direct-sequence CDMA for single-carrier AMSS 5096.0000 - 5250.0000 MHz 1M23G2W CDMA voice and data: QPSK waveform consists of multiple direct-sequence spread-spectrum 1.23 Mchip/sec channels whose carriers are uniformly spaced. 6900.0000 - 7025.0000 MHz 1M23G7W Direct-sequence CDMA for single-carrier AMSS 6900.0000 - 7025.0000 MHz 1M23G2W 55.00 dBW CDMA voice and data: QPSK waveform consists of multiple direct-sequence spread-spectrum 1.23 Mchip/sec channels whose carriers are uniformly spaced. 5096.0000 - 5250.0000 MHz 1M23G7W Points of Communication: SBRG-1 - GLOBALSTAR - (NGSO) E050098 SES-LIC-20050617-00769E Date Effective:
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • 4.71 3.10 16.17 10/01/85 05/31/86 4.33 4.33 3.10 15.38 06/01/86 12/31/86 3.04 4.33 3.10 14.00 01/01/87 06/30/87 1.55 4.33 3.10 12.41 07/01/87 12/31/87 0.69 4.33 3.10 11.49 01/01/88 11/30/88 0.00 4.14 3.10 10.56 12/01/88 02/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/89 03/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • Jurisdiction ..................................................... Table 3.20 ILEC Loops - by Study Area ............................................................... Table 3.34 Income - Net ........................................................................................................... Table 11.5 Information for Allocating CLEC Revenues .............................................. Table 1.19 Information for Allocating Incumbent Local Exchange Revenues .....................Table 1.18 Information for Allocating Interstate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.22 Information for Allocating Interstate Toll ...................................................Table 1.26 Information for Allocating Intrastate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.23 Information for Allocating LEC Intrastate Toll ............................................ Table 1.24 Information for Allocating Mobile Wireless Revenues .................................. Table 1.20 3 Index of Tables and Charts Information for Allocating Non-LEC Intrastate Toll ......................................Table 1.25 Information for Allocating SLC Revenues ................................................. Table 1.21 Installation, Maintenance, and Customer Complaints ............................................ Table 9.1 Interstate Access Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 3.12 Interstate
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A2.txt
  • Jurisdiction ..................................................... Table 3.20 ILEC Loops - by Study Area ............................................................... Table 3.34 Income - Net ........................................................................................................... Table 11.5 Information for Allocating CLEC Revenues .............................................. Table 1.19 Information for Allocating Incumbent Local Exchange Revenues .....................Table 1.18 Information for Allocating Interstate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.22 Information for Allocating Interstate Toll ...................................................Table 1.26 Information for Allocating Intrastate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.23 Information for Allocating LEC Intrastate Toll ............................................ Table 1.24 Information for Allocating Mobile Wireless Revenues .................................. Table 1.20 3 Index of Tables and Charts Information for Allocating Non-LEC Intrastate Toll ......................................Table 1.25 Information for Allocating SLC Revenues ................................................. Table 1.21 Installation, Maintenance, and Customer Complaints ............................................ Table 9.1 Interstate Access Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 3.12 Interstate
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A3.txt
  • carriers and rate-of-return carriers are assumed to be $9.20 per line per month for multiline business. 1 -12 subscriber line charge revenues. Allocation percentages in each state are the ratio of the state's allocation revenues to nationwide revenues. Access revenues by type are determined by multiplying the allocation factors by the revenues of each type (see Table 1.14). In Table 1.23, intrastate access revenues are allocated between states based on intrastate access revenues from ARMIS Report 43-08. Intrastate access revenues for allocation are the product of these access revenues and the adjustment formula in Table 1.17. Allocation percentage in each state is the ratio of the state's allocation revenues to nationwide revenues. Access revenues by type are determined by multiplying the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.txt
  • N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Virginia 6.72 8.25 6.99 0.00 3.50 3.27 0.00 1.75 1.64 6.72 10.00 8.63 6.72 13.50 11.90 Washington 6.50 8.25 7.82 0.00 3.50 2.30 0.00 1.75 1.15 6.50 10.00 8.97 6.50 13.50 11.27 West Virginia 6.50 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 2.80 0.00 1.75 1.40 6.50 10.00 9.65 6.50 13.50 12.44 Wisconsin 6.82 8.25 7.28 0.00 3.50 1.23 0.00 1.75 0.62 6.82 10.00 7.90 6.82 13.50 9.13 Wyoming 8.15 8.25 8.20 3.30 3.50 3.41 1.65 1.75 1.70 9.80 10.00 9.91 13.10 13.50 13.32 Nationwide $1.76 $8.25 $7.12 $0.00 $3.50 $2.59 $0.00 $1.75 $1.30 $1.76 $10.00 $8.41 $1.76 $13.50 $11.01 Note: This table reflects only non-tribal support. All averages are weighted averages. 1 Basic federal support includes both Tier
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • 3.89 0.16 310691 C DEERFIELD FARMERS TEL. CO. -4.92 -2.47 -2.51 -8.44 310692 A DRENTHE TEL. CO. 7.28 2.12 5.05 15.77 310694 A FARMERS MUT. OF CHAPIN DBA CHAPIN TEL. CO. 4.38 -0.98 5.42 14.28 310695 C VERIZON NORTH INC.-MI -7.30 -4.77 -2.65 0.00 310702 C CENTURYTEL OF MICHIGAN, INC. 0.11 -5.08 5.47 7.58 310703 A KALEVA TEL. CO. 8.04 1.23 6.73 20.84 310704 C ACE TEL. CO. OF MI, INC. 3.46 -3.69 7.42 15.39 310705 C CENTURY TELEPHONE OF NORTHERN MICHIGAN, INC. 0.79 -4.47 5.50 7.26 310708 C LENNON TEL. CO. -4.12 -5.57 1.53 -5.23 310711 C MIDWAY TEL. CO. -4.24 -5.12 0.93 -5.78 310713 C HIAWATHA TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.12 -2.44 9.80 39.44 310714 C OGDEN TEL. CO. -2.90 -3.89
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.txt
  • Monthly Charge 17.70 18.18 18.11 19.05 19.24 19.77 19.72 19.95 19.81 20.01 19.95 19.88 19.76 19.93 20.78 22.62 24.07 24.52 24.52 24.57 25.27 Basic Connection Charge 45.63 44.04 42.94 43.06 43.06 42.00 41.50 41.38 41.28 40.91 41.11 41.04 41.24 41.26 41.45 40.02 39.83 39.22 39.26 39.62 39.44 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 1.34 1.31 1.55 1.76 1.77 1.27 1.22 1.23 0.85 0.23 0.23 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 **** **** **** **** **** Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.48 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • 4.71 3.10 16.17 10/01/85 05/31/86 4.33 4.33 3.10 15.38 06/01/86 12/31/86 3.04 4.33 3.10 14.00 01/01/87 06/30/87 1.55 4.33 3.10 12.41 07/01/87 12/31/87 0.69 4.33 3.10 11.49 01/01/88 11/30/88 0.00 4.14 3.10 10.56 12/01/88 02/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/89 03/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.39 2.48 2.57 3.03 3.94 4.12 4.14 4.15 4.26 4.26 Total Monthly Charge $17.70$18.18$18.11$19.05$19.24$19.77$19.72$19.95$19.81$20.01$19.95$19.88$19.76$19.93$20.78$22.62$24.07$24.52$24.52$24.64 $25.26 $25.62 Basic Connection Charge 4 45.63 44.04 42.94 43.06 43.06 42.00 41.50 41.38 41.28 40.91 41.11 41.04 41.24 41.26 41.45 40.02 39.83 39.22 39.26 39.62 39.68 39.81 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.34 1.31 1.55 1.76 1.77 1.27 1.22 1.23 0.85 0.23 0.23 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 a4 a4 a4 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95$44.10$42.95$41.16$42.54$42.71$42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • Jurisdiction ..................................................... Table 3.20 ILEC Loops - by Study Area ............................................................... Table 3.34 Income - Net ........................................................................................................... Table 11.5 Information for Allocating CLEC Revenues .............................................. Table 1.19 Information for Allocating Incumbent Local Exchange Revenues .....................Table 1.18 Information for Allocating Interstate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.22 Information for Allocating Interstate Toll ...................................................Table 1.26 Information for Allocating Intrastate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.23 Information for Allocating LEC Intrastate Toll ............................................ Table 1.24 Information for Allocating Mobile Wireless Revenues .................................. Table 1.20 Information for Allocating Non-LEC Intrastate Toll ......................................Table 1.25 3 Index of Tables and Charts Information for Allocating SLC Revenues ................................................. Table 1.21 Installation, Maintenance, and Customer Complaints ............................................ Table 9.1 Interstate Access Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 3.12 Interstate
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A2.pdf
  • Jurisdiction ..................................................... Table 3.20 ILEC Loops - by Study Area ............................................................... Table 3.34 Income - Net ........................................................................................................... Table 11.5 Information for Allocating CLEC Revenues .............................................. Table 1.19 Information for Allocating Incumbent Local Exchange Revenues .....................Table 1.18 Information for Allocating Interstate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.22 Information for Allocating Interstate Toll ...................................................Table 1.26 Information for Allocating Intrastate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.23 Information for Allocating LEC Intrastate Toll ............................................ Table 1.24 Information for Allocating Mobile Wireless Revenues .................................. Table 1.20 Information for Allocating Non-LEC Intrastate Toll ......................................Table 1.25 3 Index of Tables and Charts Information for Allocating SLC Revenues ................................................. Table 1.21 Installation, Maintenance, and Customer Complaints ............................................ Table 9.1 Interstate Access Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 3.12 Interstate
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A3.pdf
  • pool and rate-of-return carriers during the relevant time period was $6.50. 34 The rates of NECA pool carriers and rate-of-return carriers are assumed to be $9.20 per line per month for multiline business. 1 -12 to nationwide revenues. Access revenues by type are determined by multiplying the allocation factors by the revenues of each type (see Table 1.14). In Table 1.23, intrastate access revenues are allocated between states based on intrastate access revenues from ARMIS Report 43-08. Intrastate access revenues for allocation are the product of these access revenues and the adjustment formula in Table 1.17. Allocation percentage in each state is the ratio of the state's allocation revenues to nationwide revenues. Access revenues by type are determined by multiplying the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A4.pdf
  • NA NA NA NA NA Virginia 6.68 8.25 7.51 0.00 3.50 3.19 0.00 1.75 1.59 6.68 10.00 9.10 6.68 13.50 12.29 Washington 6.75 8.25 7.81 0.00 3.50 1.97 0.00 1.75 0.99 6.75 10.00 8.80 6.75 13.50 10.77 West Virginia 6.50 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 2.78 0.00 1.75 1.39 6.50 10.00 9.64 6.50 13.50 12.42 Wisconsin 6.81 8.25 7.30 0.00 3.50 1.23 0.00 1.75 0.62 6.81 10.00 7.92 6.81 13.50 9.15 Wyoming 8.25 8.25 8.25 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 10.00 10.00 10.00 13.50 13.50 13.50 Nationwide $1.76 $8.25 $7.24 $0.00 $3.50 $2.66 $0.00 $1.75 $1.33 $1.76 $10.00 $8.57 $1.76 $13.50 $11.23 Notes: This table reflects only non-tribal support. All averages are weighted averages. 1 Basic federal support includes both Tier
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • INC. -2.29 1.89 -4.10 -56.96 613003 C BRISTOL BAY TELEPHONE COOP. INC. 22.01 7.54 13.45 31.56 613004 C BUSH-TELL INC. -7.65 1.65 -9.15 -16.83 613005 A CIRCLE UTILITIES 5.10 0.00 5.10 7.34 613006 C COPPER VALLEY TEL. COOP. INC. 4.66 -5.35 10.58 6.96 613007 C CORDOVA TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE, INC. 19.15 -3.58 23.57 31.22 613008 C ACS OF FAIRBANKS, INC. -2.44 -1.23 -1.23 -69.99 613010 C ACS - NORTHLAND GLACIER STATE -4.85 -0.63 -4.25 -15.81 613011 C INTERIOR TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -4.42 -1.23 -3.22 -8.52 613011A C INTERIOR TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -0.73 -3.25 2.60 -1.62 613012 C ACS - ALASKA JUNEAU -8.83 -2.41 -6.57 0.00 613013 C KETCHIKAN PUBLIC UTILITIES -1.17 -3.27 2.17 -2.94 613015 C MATANUSKA TELEPHONE ASSOC., INC. 3.48 0.12
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A7.pdf
  • 58 1,893 0.03 Puerto Rico 0 3,859 0.00 Rhode Island 0 55 0.00 South Carolina 51 1,205 0.04 South Dakota 964 503 1.92 Tennessee 167 1,827 0.09 Texas 958 3,280 0.29 Utah 746 531 1.41 Vermont 83 448 0.18 Virgin Islands 41 109 0.38 Virginia 312 1,503 0.21 Washington 68 1,136 0.06 West Virginia 119 1,043 0.11 Wisconsin 2,169 1,757 1.23 Wyoming 115 354 0.33 Totals $38,345 58,795 $0.65 1 Source: USAC data. Rollups performed by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, FCC. Note: Disbursements through June 30, 2008. Because of the appeals process, funding commitments and disbursements may be made after the program year ended. Population in entirely rural counties as of April 1, 2000 from the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.pdf
  • $18.18 $18.11 $19.05 $19.24 $19.77 $19.72 $19.95 $19.81 $20.01 $19.95 $19.88 $19.76 $19.93 $20.78 $22.62 $24.07 $24.52 $24.52 $24.64 $25.26 $25.62 Basic Connection Charge 4 45.63 44.04 42.94 43.06 43.06 42.00 41.50 41.38 41.28 40.91 41.11 41.04 41.24 41.26 41.45 40.02 39.83 39.22 39.26 39.62 39.68 39.81 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.34 1.31 1.55 1.76 1.77 1.27 1.22 1.23 0.85 0.23 0.23 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 a4 a4 a4 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • ILEC Loops - by State or Jurisdiction ..................................................... Table 3.20 ILEC Loops - by Study Area ............................................................... Table 3.34 Information for Allocating CLEC Revenues .............................................. Table 1.19 Information for Allocating Incumbent Local Exchange Revenues .....................Table 1.18 Information for Allocating Interstate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.22 Information for Allocating Interstate Toll ...................................................Table 1.26 Information for Allocating Intrastate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.23 Information for Allocating LEC Intrastate Toll ............................................ Table 1.24 Information for Allocating Mobile Wireless Revenues .................................. Table 1.20 Information for Allocating Non-LEC Intrastate Toll ......................................Table 1.25 Information for Allocating SLC Revenues ................................................. Table 1.21 Installation, Maintenance, and Customer Complaints ............................................ Table 9.1 Interstate Access Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 3.12 3 Index of Tables and Charts Interstate
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A2.txt
  • ILEC Loops - by State or Jurisdiction ..................................................... Table 3.20 ILEC Loops - by Study Area ............................................................... Table 3.34 Information for Allocating CLEC Revenues .............................................. Table 1.19 Information for Allocating Incumbent Local Exchange Revenues .....................Table 1.18 Information for Allocating Interstate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.22 Information for Allocating Interstate Toll ...................................................Table 1.26 Information for Allocating Intrastate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.23 Information for Allocating LEC Intrastate Toll ............................................ Table 1.24 Information for Allocating Mobile Wireless Revenues .................................. Table 1.20 Information for Allocating Non-LEC Intrastate Toll ......................................Table 1.25 Information for Allocating SLC Revenues ................................................. Table 1.21 Installation, Maintenance, and Customer Complaints ............................................ Table 9.1 Interstate Access Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 3.12 3 Index of Tables and Charts Interstate
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.txt
  • wireless subscribers as of June 2007. 34 Carrier USF loop counts are used as weights. We assume that the residential SLC for NECA pool and rate-of-return carriers during the relevant time period was $6.50. 35 The rates of NECA pool carriers and rate-of-return carriers are assumed to be $9.20 per line per month for multiline business. 1 -12 In Table 1.23, intrastate access revenues are allocated between states based on intrastate access revenues from ARMIS Report 43-08. Intrastate access revenues for allocation are the product of these access revenues and the adjustment formula in Table 1.17. Allocation percentage in each state is the ratio of the state's allocation revenues to nationwide revenues. Access revenues by type are determined by multiplying the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • A CONSOLIDATED TELCO, INC. -18.06 -4.83 -13.90 -49.72 371531 C CLARKS TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO. -25.96 -6.73 -20.62 -67.75 371532 A CONSOLIDATED TELEPHONE COMPANY- NE -19.50 -2.17 -17.71 -49.99 371534 C COZAD TELEPHONE COMPANY -3.33 -3.62 0.29 -7.99 371536 C CURTIS TELEPHONE COMPANY -15.01 -5.42 -10.14 -21.86 371537 C DALTON TEL. CO.,INC. -17.84 -4.93 -13.57 -22.73 371540 C DILLER TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.48 -1.23 10.85 12.36 371542 C EASTERN NEBRASKA TELEPHONE COMPANY -12.89 -3.58 -9.66 -85.01 371553 C GLENWOOD TELEPHONE MEMBERSHIP CORP. 8.95 -3.05 12.38 11.31 371555 A HAMILTON TELEPHONE COMPANY 1.11 6.85 -5.37 -46.34 371556 C HARTINGTON TEL. CO. 11.06 -11.49 25.48 57.12 371557 C HARTMAN TELEPHONE EXCHANGES INC. 5.02 0.62 4.36 4.67 371558 C HEMINGFORD COOP. TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.10 -0.81 2.93 1.39
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.txt
  • 4.71 3.10 16.17 10/01/85 05/31/86 4.33 4.33 3.10 15.38 06/01/86 12/31/86 3.04 4.33 3.10 14.00 01/01/87 06/30/87 1.55 4.33 3.10 12.41 07/01/87 12/31/87 0.69 4.33 3.10 11.49 01/01/88 11/30/88 0.00 4.14 3.10 10.56 12/01/88 02/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/89 03/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296920A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296920A1.txt
  • incorporate previously-granted Ancillary Terrestrial Component Authority. GUSA also request waiver of Section 304 of the Commission's rules. 17 ° 58 ' 48.00 " N LAT. SITE ID: LPMA-1 Road 303 INT. KM 12.1, Caba Rojo, Cabo Rojo, PR 67 ° 8 ' 15.00 " W LONG. LOCATION: Alcatel LPMA-1 5.5 meters ANTENNA ID: 9775 FEEDER LINK & TELEMETRY - CDMA 1.23 MC/SEC/QPSK 6900.0000 - 7055.0000 MHz 1M23G7W 55.00 dBW FEEDER LINK & TELEMETRY - CDMA 1.23 MC/SEC/QPSK 5091.0000 - 5250.0000 MHz 1M23G7W CDMA VOICE AND DATA 6900.0000 - 7055.0000 MHz 1M23G7W UNMODULATED CW FOR TESTING 6900.0000 - 7055.0000 MHz N0N 55.00 dBW CDMA VOICE AND DATA 5096.0000 - 5250.0000 MHz 1M23G7W WHITE NOISE MODULATED CARRIER FOR TESTING 6900.0000 - 7055.0000 MHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297913A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297913A1.txt
  • 06/23/2025 Renewal GCL Licensee LLC Nature of Service: Domestic Mobile-Satellite Service, Feeder Link for Mobile Satellite Service 17 ° 58 ' 48.00 " N LAT. SITE ID: LPMA-1 Road 303 INT. KM 12.1, Caba Rojo, Cabo Rojo, PR 67 ° 8 ' 15.00 " W LONG. LOCATION: Alcatel 5.5M 5.5 meters ANTENNA ID: 9775 FEEDER LINK & TELEMETRY - CDMA 1.23 MC/SEC/QPSK 6900.0000 - 7055.0000 MHz 1M23G7W CDMA VOICE AND DATA 6900.0000 - 7055.0000 MHz 1M23G7W UNMODULATED CW FOR TESTING 6900.0000 - 7055.0000 MHz NON WHITE NOISE MODULATED CARRIER FOR TESTING 6900.0000 - 7055.0000 MHz 1M23XXX DIRECT-SEQUENCE CDMA FOR SINGLE-CARRIER AMSS 6900.0000 - 7055.0000 MHz 1M23G2W 55.00 dBW CDMA VOICE AND DATA 5096.0000 - 5250.0000 MHz 1M23G7W 59.00 dBW WHITE NOISE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.txt
  • 4.71 3.10 16.17 10/01/85 05/31/86 4.33 4.33 3.10 15.38 06/01/86 12/31/86 3.04 4.33 3.10 14.00 01/01/87 06/30/87 1.55 4.33 3.10 12.41 07/01/87 12/31/87 0.69 4.33 3.10 11.49 01/01/88 11/30/88 0.00 4.14 3.10 10.56 12/01/88 02/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/89 03/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302424A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302424A1.txt
  • FL 81 ° 21 ' 26.60 " W LONG. LOCATION: ALCATEL SBR RFT1 5.5 meters ANTENNA ID: 9775 Unmodulated CW for testing 6900.0000 - 7025.0000 MHz N0N White noise modulated carrier for testing 6900.0000 - 7025.0000 MHz 1M23XXX Direct-sequence CDMA for single-carrier telemetry data 6900.0000 - 7025.0000 MHz 2M50G2D CDMA voice and data: QPSK waveform consists of multiple direct-sequence spread-spectrum 1.23 Mchip/sec channels whose carriers are uniformly spaced. 6900.0000 - 7025.0000 MHz 1M23G7W Direct-sequence CDMA for single-carrier AMSS 6900.0000 - 7025.0000 MHz 1M23G2W Page 1 of 15 CDMA voice and data 6900.0000 - 7025.0000 MHz 1M23G7W Unmodulated CW for testing 6900.0000 - 7025.0000 MHz N0N Wideband CDMA voice and data 6900.0000 - 7025.0000 MHz 2M46G7W Wideband CDMA for single-carrier AMSS 6900.0000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
  • $1,354 $154 $2,321 1.47% Alaska 106 33 1 167 24 331 0.21 American Samoa 4 0 0 7 1 12 0.01 Arizona 703 365 5 1,719 161 2,953 1.87 Arkansas 387 67 1 852 88 1,395 0.88 California 6,202 1,361 26 11,130 1,417 20,136 12.77 Colorado 714 251 3 1,417 163 2,548 1.62 Connecticut 590 187 1 1,031 135 1,945 1.23 Delaware 143 49 0 270 33 496 0.31 District of Columbia 285 54 0 365 65 769 0.49 Florida 2,869 807 10 5,508 655 9,849 6.24 Georgia 1,329 347 5 2,837 304 4,821 3.06 Guam 22 8 0 25 5 62 0.04 Hawaii 187 34 0 389 43 652 0.41 Idaho 220 37 1 392 50 700 0.44 Illinois 2,012
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A3.txt
  • $1,354 $154 $2,321 1.47% Alaska 106 33 1 167 24 331 0.21 American Samoa 4 0 0 7 1 12 0.01 Arizona 703 365 5 1,719 161 2,953 1.87 Arkansas 387 67 1 852 88 1,395 0.88 California 6,202 1,361 26 11,130 1,417 20,136 12.77 Colorado 714 251 3 1,417 163 2,548 1.62 Connecticut 590 187 1 1,031 135 1,945 1.23 Delaware 143 49 0 270 33 496 0.31 District of Columbia 285 54 0 365 65 769 0.49 Florida 2,869 807 10 5,508 655 9,849 6.24 Georgia 1,329 347 5 2,837 304 4,821 3.06 Guam 22 8 0 25 5 62 0.04 Hawaii 187 34 0 389 43 652 0.41 Idaho 220 37 1 392 50 700 0.44 Illinois 2,012
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A4.txt
  • Max. Avg. Alabama $8.25 $8.25 $8.25 $0.00 $3.50 $3.09 $0.00 $1.75 $1.55 $8.25 $10.00 $9.80 $8.25 $13.50 $12.89 Alaska 8.25 8.25 8.25 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.73 10.00 10.00 9.98 13.50 13.50 13.48 American Samoa 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25 Arizona 8.05 8.25 8.20 0.00 3.50 2.47 0.00 1.75 1.23 8.05 10.00 9.43 8.05 13.50 11.90 Arkansas 5.25 8.25 7.43 0.00 3.50 2.14 0.00 1.75 1.07 5.25 10.00 8.50 5.25 13.50 10.64 California 3.98 8.25 6.64 3.36 3.50 3.39 1.68 1.75 1.70 5.66 10.00 8.34 9.02 13.50 11.73 Colorado 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 3.46 0.00 1.75 1.73 8.25 10.00 9.98 8.25 13.50 13.44 Connecticut 7.52 7.52 7.52 1.18 3.50
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.txt
  • from 2008 to 2009 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name TOTAL ALABAMA -1.91 -6.63 5.06 10.18 250282 C BLOUNTSVILLE TEL CO -3.33 -2.80 -0.55 -28.33 250283 A BRINDLEE MOUNTAIN -7.88 -3.82 -4.23 0.00 250284 C BUTLER TEL CO -4.41 -5.16 0.79 -56.60 250285 A CASTLEBERRY TEL CO 3.18 -1.79 5.06 -38.61 250286 C NATIONAL OF ALABAMA -1.23 -6.60 5.75 -5.66 250290 C FARMERS TELECOM COOP 16.12 -8.04 26.27 71.60 250295 C KNOLOGY TOTAL COMM 0.89 -6.77 8.21 0.87 250298 C GULF TEL CO - AL -3.45 -7.14 3.98 0.00 250299 C HAYNEVILLE TEL CO -3.06 -2.61 -0.46 -26.87 250300 C HOPPER TELECOMM. CO. -7.45 -5.17 -2.41 -13.24 250301 A FRONTIER-LAMAR CNTY 2.41 -2.14 4.65 -51.31 250302 C
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A9.txt
  • 4.71 3.10 16.17 10/01/85 05/31/86 4.33 4.33 3.10 15.38 06/01/86 12/31/86 3.04 4.33 3.10 14.00 01/01/87 06/30/87 1.55 4.33 3.10 12.41 07/01/87 12/31/87 0.69 4.33 3.10 11.49 01/01/88 11/30/88 0.00 4.14 3.10 10.56 12/01/88 02/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/89 03/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305212A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305212A1.txt
  • CLFN-2 Route 2, Box 149AA, Bosque, Clifton, TX 97 ° 36 ' 44.70 " W LONG. LOCATION: Alcatel 1 5.5 meters ANTENNA ID: 9775 White noise modulated carrier for testing. 6900.0000 - 7055.0000 MHz 1M23XXX Unmodulated CW for Testing. 6900.0000 - 7055.0000 MHz 50K0N0N Waveform consists of multiple direct-sequence spread-spectrum channels whose carriers are uniformly spaced. Each CDMA channel is 1.23 Mc/sec. Each CDMA Waveform is QPSK. 6900.0000 - 7055.0000 MHz 1M23G7W Page 51 of 77 Telemetry Carrier using a Manchester-Encoded Formatted Signal @ 1000.117 bps. 6875.0000 - 6878.0000 MHz 7K00G1D 59.00 dBW White noise modulated carrier for testing. 5096.0000 - 5250.0000 MHz 1M23XXX 59.00 dBW Unmodulated CW for Testing. 5096.0000 - 5250.0000 MHz 50K0N0N 55.00 dBW Waveform consists of multiple
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306118A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306118A1.txt
  • ' 26.60 " W LONG. LOCATION: ALCATEL SBR RFT1 5.5 meters ANTENNA ID: 9775 Unmodulated CW for testing 6900.0000 - 7025.0000 MHz N0N White noise modulated carrier for testing 6900.0000 - 7025.0000 MHz 1M23XXX Page 7 of 12 Direct-sequence CDMA for single-carrier telemetry data 6900.0000 - 7025.0000 MHz 2M50G2D CDMA voice and data: QPSK waveform consists of multiple direct-sequence spread-spectrum 1.23 Mchip/sec channels whose carriers are uniformly spaced. 6900.0000 - 7025.0000 MHz 1M23G7W Direct-sequence CDMA for single-carrier AMSS 6900.0000 - 7025.0000 MHz 1M23G2W CDMA voice and data 6900.0000 - 7025.0000 MHz 1M23G7W Unmodulated CW for testing 6900.0000 - 7025.0000 MHz N0N Wideband CDMA voice and data 6900.0000 - 7025.0000 MHz 2M46G7W Wideband CDMA for single-carrier AMSS 6900.0000 - 7025.0000 MHz 2M46G2W
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306317A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306317A1.txt
  • LONG. LOCATION: ALCATEL SBR RFT2 5.5 meters ANTENNA ID: 9775 Unmodulated CW for testing 6900.0000 - 7025.0000 MHz N0N White-noise-modulated carrier for testing 6900.0000 - 7025.0000 MHz 1M23XXX Direct-sequence CDMA for single-carrier telemetry data 6875.0000 - 7055.0000 MHz 2M50G2D Direct-sequence CDMA for single-carrier AMSS 6900.0000 - 7025.0000 MHz 1M23G2W CDMA voice and data: QPSK waveform consists of multiple direct-sequence spread-spectrum 1.23 Mchip/sec channels whose carriers are uniformly spaced. 6900.0000 - 7025.0000 MHz 1M23G7W CDMA voice and data 6875.0000 - 7055.0000 MHz 1M23G7W Unmodulated CW for testing 6875.0000 - 7055.0000 MHz N0N Wideband CDMA voice and data 6875.0000 - 7055.0000 MHz 2M46G7W Wideband CDMA for single-carrier AMSS 6875.0000 - 7055.0000 MHz 2M46G2W White-noise-modulated carrier for testing 6875.0000 - 7055.0000 MHz 1M23XXX Direct-sequence
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307303A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307303A1.txt
  • RFT2 5.5 meters ANTENNA ID: 9775 Unmodulated CW for testing 6900.0000 - 7025.0000 MHz N0N White-noise-modulated carrier for testing 6900.0000 - 7025.0000 MHz 1M23XXX Direct-sequence CDMA for single-carrier telemetry data 6875.0000 - 7055.0000 MHz 2M50G2D Direct-sequence CDMA for single-carrier AMSS 6900.0000 - 7025.0000 MHz 1M23G2W Page 5 of 20 CDMA voice and data: QPSK waveform consists of multiple direct-sequence spread-spectrum 1.23 Mchip/sec channels whose carriers are uniformly spaced. 6900.0000 - 7025.0000 MHz 1M23G7W CDMA voice and data 6875.0000 - 7055.0000 MHz 1M23G7W Unmodulated CW for testing 6875.0000 - 7055.0000 MHz N0N Wideband CDMA voice and data 6875.0000 - 7055.0000 MHz 2M46G7W Wideband CDMA for single-carrier AMSS 6875.0000 - 7055.0000 MHz 2M46G2W White-noise-modulated carrier for testing 6875.0000 - 7055.0000 MHz 1M23XXX Direct-sequence
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.txt
  • 4.71 3.10 16.17 10/01/85 05/31/86 4.33 4.33 3.10 15.38 06/01/86 12/31/86 3.04 4.33 3.10 14.00 01/01/87 06/30/87 1.55 4.33 3.10 12.41 07/01/87 12/31/87 0.69 4.33 3.10 11.49 01/01/88 11/30/88 0.00 4.14 3.10 10.56 12/01/88 02/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/89 03/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.txt
  • the data over time. AGGREGATE METRICS DISAGGREGATED METRICS Metric January February March April Number Metric Name VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC Notes Preorder and OSS Interface Availability OSS Response Times PO-1-01 Customer Service Record - EDI 2.75 2.42 2.76 2.37 2.69 2.38 2.70 2.85 PO-1-01 Customer Service Record - CORBA 2.75 1.19 2.76 1.03 2.69 1.08 2.70 1.23 PO-1-01 Customer Service Record - Web GUI 2.75 5.59 2.76 3.50 2.69 1.62 2.70 3.20 PO-1-02 Due Date Availability - EDI 0.12 3.67 0.14 2.62 0.12 2.48 0.13 2.77 PO-1-02 Due Date Availability - CORBA 0.12 1.97 0.14 0.71 0.12 NA 0.13 NA PO-1-02 Due Date Availability - Web GUI 0.12 5.39 0.14 2.47 0.12 1.22 0.13 2.35 PO-1-03 Address
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-329A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-329A1.txt
  • NY Fox, Craig 1990 Sep-97 0 0.4 0 A WKRL FM Modern Rock Syracuse, NY 78 N. Syracuse NY Galaxy Communications 1972 Feb-94 1600 4.4 0.91 A WTLA AM Adlt Stndrd Syracuse, NY 78 N. Syracuse NY Galaxy Communications 1959 Feb-94 200 1 0.36 B WTKW FM Clsc Rock Syracuse, NY 78 Bridgeport NY Galaxy Communications 1992 Aug-94 1800 3.5 1.23 A WSGO AM Adlt Stndrd Syracuse, NY 78 Oswego NY Galaxy Communications 1960 Dec-95 0 0 0 B WTKV FM Clsc Rock Syracuse, NY 78 Oswego NY Galaxy Communications 1973 Dec-95 0 1.7 0 A WZUN FM AC Syracuse, NY 78 Phoenix NY Galaxy Communications 1995 Dec-00 300 2.1 0.18 A WSCP AM Country Syracuse, NY 78 Sandy Creek NY
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-369A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-369A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-369A1.txt
  • referred to and accessible subject to procedures specified in 18 U.S.C. § 2703(c) or (d) or 18 U.S.C. § 2709. Such information shall also be considered Subscriber Information when it is sought pursuant to the provisions of other Lawful U.S. Process. 1.22 "Telenor" has the meaning given to it in the Preamble. It includes all successors and assigns of Telenor. 1.23 "Telenor Broadband Services AS" or "TBS" has the meaning given to it in the Preamble, and also encompasses its directly or indirectly wholly-owned Norway-incorporated subsidiaries, Telenor Satellite Mobile Ventures AS and Telenor Satellite Mobile AS, including all of their successors, assigns and subsidiaries. 1.24 "Telenor USA" has the meaning given to it in the Preamble. It includes all successors, assigns
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-107A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-107A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-107A1.txt
  • Programming and equipment $36.07 $34.97 $34.51 $33.11 $28.16 Standard error 0.29 0.33 0.29 0.38 0.93 Number of channels 63.81 60.37 56.41 43.22 32.56 Standard error 0.83 0.97 0.84 1.29 1.80 Rate per channel † $0.518 $0.536 $0.577 $0.765 $0.900 Standard error 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.04 No. of satellite channels 46.61 44.38 42.89 33.75 25.29 Standard error 0.68 0.77 0.71 1.23 1.63 Rate per satellite channel $0.711 $0.735 $.0.764 $1.019 $1.211 Standard error 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.07 July 1, 1999 Programming total $30.68 $29.75 $29.72 $29.68 $26.34 Standard error 0.25 0.28 0.27 0.33 0.83 Number of channels 61.26 57.64 53.20 41.54 32.24 Standard error 0.87 0.95 0.82 1.29 1.67 Rate per channel † $0.508 $0.531 $0.579 $0.759 $0.870 Standard error
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-179A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-179A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-179A1.txt
  • 1999. BellSouth and KPN closed on their agreement to swap BellSouth's E-Plus shares for a stake in KPN on March 13, 2002. BellSouth then disposed of its 9.42 percent stake in KPN by selling its shares in the Dutch company on March 19, 2002, the first day BellSouth was free to sell the shares. BellSouth is reported to have raised 1.23 billion euros ($1.1 billion) from the sale of its shares in KPN, and announced it will record an after-tax gain of approximately $850 million as a result of the share swap and subsequent disposal. BellSouth has also signaled its desire to sell its stake in Danish mobile operator Sonafon, which is majority owned by Norwegian carrier Telenor with BellSouth as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-179A1_Erratum.doc
  • 1999. BellSouth and KPN closed on their agreement to swap BellSouth's E-Plus shares for a stake in KPN on March 13, 2002. BellSouth then disposed of its 9.42 percent stake in KPN by selling its shares in the Dutch company on March 19, 2002, the first day BellSouth was free to sell the shares. BellSouth is reported to have raised 1.23 billion euros ($1.1 billion) from the sale of its shares in KPN, and announced it will record an after-tax gain of approximately $850 million as a result of the share swap and subsequent disposal. BellSouth has also signaled its desire to sell its stake in Danish mobile operator Sonafon, which is majority owned by Norwegian carrier Telenor with BellSouth as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.txt
  • Communications Commission FCC 02-330 California Performance Metric Data Sept. 2002 August 2002 Metric Name and Disaggregation Metric Number July 2002 May 2002 June 2002 24 - 2400100% Block Common Trnks: Common Trnks 0.98 2.00 0.33 2.00 0.33 2.00 0.81 2.00 0.93 2.00 26 - 2600200NXX Load LERG Effect Dt: Whlsle 99.92 n/a100.00 n/a100.00 n/a100.00 n/a100.00100.00 28 - 2800200Resale 1.26 3.35 1.23 3.31 1.41 2.63 1.28 2.43 1.46 2.53 28 - 2800300Unbundled 1.32 3.35 1.30 3.31 1.49 2.63 1.35 2.43 1.52 2.53 28 - 2800500Meet Pt 1.80 3.35 1.78 3.31 2.17 2.63 1.70 2.43 1.57 2.53 30 - 3000100Resalse 100.0099.00100.0099.00100.0099.00100.0099.00100.0099.00 30 - 3000200Unbundled 100.0099.00100.0099.00100.0099.00100.0099.00100.0099.00 30 - 3000300Fac/Int Cnnct 100.0099.00100.0099.00100.0099.00100.0099.00100.0099.00 31 - 3100200Resale 99.2699.04 99.6499.55 99.8099.42 99.7499.52 99.8199.51 31 - 3100300Unbundled 99.0799.04 99.8999.55
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.txt
  • CLEC Notes Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-331 Florida Performance Metric Data A.2.1.1.1.2Residence/<10 circuits/Non- Dispatch/FL (days) 0.86 0.70 0.84 0.88 0.83 0.83 0.81 0.77 1.00 0.73 A.2.1.1.2.1Residence/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 4.64 4.00 4.68 4.33 4.86 5.00 4.64 4.00 4.25 4.00 1,2,3,4,5 A.2.1.2.1.1Business/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 3.54 3.25 6.02 4.10 6.40 4.08 4.92 4.49 5.88 5.56 A.2.1.2.1.2Business/<10 circuits/Non- Dispatch/FL (days) 1.29 0.94 1.22 1.08 1.23 0.96 1.25 0.84 1.28 0.92 A.2.1.2.2.1Business/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 10.28 8.57 11.50 5.25 12.35 9.50 14.71 3.33 13.70 6.60 1,2,3,4,5 A.2.1.2.2.2Business/>=10 circuits/Non- Dispatch/FL (days) 4.07 7.00 13.72 5.50 0.52 1.00 7.00 0.83 1,2,4 A.2.1.3.1.1Design (Specials)/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 21.96 10.11 23.01 6.62 23.84 12.49 26.81 10.74 23.69 2.50 1 A.2.1.3.1.2Design (Specials)/<10 circuits/Non- Dispatch/FL (days) 10.98 4.13 8.45 4.50 8.97 3.58 7.29 4.56
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-63A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-63A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-63A2.txt
  • 2.5 0.66 5 0 0 0 PR-8-02-5000 Open Orders in a Hold Status > 90 Days 0 0 0 0 0 0.12 0 0 0 0 Maintenance MR-2 - Trouble Report Rate MR-2-01-5000 Network Trouble Report Rate 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MR-4 - Trouble Duration Intervals MR-4-01-5000 Mean Time To Repair - Total 1.4 1.23 1.9 1.53 23 0.75 2.1 1.55 1.7 1.56 2,3,4,5 MR-4-04-5000 % Cleared (all troubles) within 24 Hours 100 100 100 100 67 100 100 100 100 100 2,3,4,5 MR-4-05-5000 % Out of Service > 2 Hours 33 13.3 50 22.2 33 0 50 28.57 14 16.7 2,3,4,5 MR-4-06-5000 % Out of Service > 4 Hours 0 0 13 0 33
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A1.txt
  • context of a future rulemaking proceeding whether to re-assign the spectrum to the TDMA system or to make it available to a new entrant. Based on recent filings, Globalstar has stated that it is operating in nine of a total of 13 CDMA channels in the Big LEO service uplink spectrum. Globalstar explains that each of the CDMA channels is 1.23 megahertz wide. A small amount of spectrum is used to provide frequency clearance between the channels and at the ends of the CDMA band for a total of approximately 11.35 megahertz in use by Globalstar. Iridium currently uses the 5.15 megahertz of spectrum assigned to it in the 1621.35-1626.5 MHz band for both service up and down links. Due to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A1_Erratum.doc
  • context of a future rulemaking proceeding whether to re-assign the spectrum to the TDMA system or to make it available to a new entrant. Based on recent filings, Globalstar has stated that it is operating in nine of a total of 13 CDMA channels in the Big LEO service uplink spectrum. Globalstar explains that each of the CDMA channels is 1.23 megahertz wide. A small amount of spectrum is used to provide frequency clearance between the channels and at the ends of the CDMA band for a total of approximately 11.35 megahertz in use by Globalstar. Iridium currently uses the 5.15 megahertz of spectrum assigned to it in the 1621.35-1626.5 MHz band for both service up and down links. Due to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A4.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A4.txt
  • in Technical Analysis 2.1 Out-of-Band Emissions of ATC Operations Globalstar's ATC system proposal is based on either the IS-95 or the CDMA-2000 standard. Table 2.0.A presents the pertinent characteristics of the IS-95 and CDMA-2000 terrestrial PCS systems. Table 2.1.A Characteristics of Candidate Big LEO ATC systems Item Units IS-95 Characteristics CDMA-2000 Characteristics Mobile Terminal EIRP (dBW) 0.2-1.0 0.1 Bandwidth (MHz) 1.23 1.25 Out-of-Band Emission Level >900kHz -42 dBc/30 kHz >1.98 MHz -54 dBc/30 kHz Receiver Sensitivity (dBW) -134 -134.0 Interference Threshold (dBW) -138.9 -140.0 Base Station EIRP (dBW) 32.0 27.0 Antenna Gain (dBi) 19.0 17.0 Out-of-Band Emission Level >750 kHz -45 dBc/30 kHz >1.98 MHz -60 dBc/30 kHz Receiver Sensitivity (dBW) -147.0 -149.0 Interference Threshold (dBW) -136.3 -144.0 3.0 Intra-Service Sharing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A4_Erratum.doc
  • in Technical Analysis 2.1 Out-of-Band Emissions of ATC Operations Globalstar's ATC system proposal is based on either the IS-95 or the CDMA-2000 standard. Table 2.0.A presents the pertinent characteristics of the IS-95 and CDMA-2000 terrestrial PCS systems. Table 2.1.A Characteristics of Candidate Big LEO ATC systems Item Units IS-95 Characteristics CDMA-2000 Characteristics Mobile Terminal EIRP (dBW) 0.2-1.0 0.1 Bandwidth (MHz) 1.23 1.25 Out-of-Band Emission Level >900kHz -42 dBc/30 kHz >1.98 MHz -54 dBc/30 kHz Receiver Sensitivity (dBW) -134 -134.0 Interference Threshold (dBW) -138.9 -140.0 Base Station EIRP (dBW) 32.0 27.0 Antenna Gain (dBi) 19.0 17.0 Out-of-Band Emission Level >750 kHz -45 dBc/30 kHz >1.98 MHz -60 dBc/30 kHz Receiver Sensitivity (dBW) -147.0 -149.0 Interference Threshold (dBW) -136.3 -144.0 3.0 Intra-Service Sharing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-134A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-134A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-134A1.txt
  • = 1.40. The average of both of these ratios is 1.46 which is approximately equal to Globalstar's stated ratio of 1.4. Table C.1 - CDMA Uplink Link Budget Column A Column B Unit Number of Users 148 28 Frequency 1615 1615 MHz Range 1740 1740 Km Receive Noise Temperature 500 500 K Receiver Noise Density -201.6 -201.6 dBW/Hz Receiver Bandwidth 1.23 1.23 MHz Date Rate 4.8 4.8 Kbps Channel Activity Factor 0.5 0.5 # Nominal Max User EIRP 0.0 0.0 dBW Spreading Loss -161.4 -161.4 dB Received Wanted Signal Level -161.4 -161.4 dBW Receive Antenna Gain 15.7 15.7 dB User Signal @ Satellite Receiver -145.7 -145.7 dBW Average Data Rate 2.4 2.4 Kbps Energy per Bit (Eb) -179.5 -179.5 dBW/Hz Interference
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-167A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-167A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-167A1.txt
  • meaning defined in 18 U.S.C. § 2510(4). 1.22. ``Lawful U.S. Process'' means lawful U.S. Federal, state, or local Electronic Surveillance or other court orders, processes, or authorizations issued under U.S. Federal, state, or local law for physical search or seizure, production of tangible things, or access to or disclosure of Domestic Communications, Call Associated Data, Transactional Data, or Subscriber Information. 1.23. ``Network Management Information'' means network management operations plans, processes and procedures; the placement of Network Operating Center(s) and linkages (for service off load or administrative activities) to other domestic and international carriers, ISPs and other critical infrastructures; descriptions of IP networks and operations processes and procedures for management control and relation to the backbone infrastructure(s) including other service providers; description
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-74A1.txt
  • § 0.461(b)(2). If the estimated amount of the FOIA fees exceeds the amount stated by a requester, the requester is provided the opportunity to agree to pay the amount, or to clarify or limit its FOIA request. 47 C.F.R. § 0.467(e). AFR at 1. Id. at 3. Id. at 4. See FOIA Request at 2. See generally 47 C.F.R. § 1.23(a) (permitting parties to be represented by counsel before the Commission) and 47 C.F.R. § 1.23(b) (``Further proof of authority to act in a representative capacity may be required.''). See AFR at 1, 4. 47 C.F.R. § 0.461(j). See also 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.461(a)(1), (a)(2), (b)(1) (all referring to ``the person requesting'' the records). 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(6)(A)(ii) (emphasis supplied). See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-194A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-194A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-194A1.txt
  • on the record before us, Iridium has made a case demonstrating its need for more spectrum. In order to address technical concerns related to Globalstar, the existing CDMA MSS system, we will require CDMA and TDMA MSS systems to share the 1617.775-1618.725 MHz segment of the L-band. Globalstar notes in its reconsideration petition that its CDMA channels are each approximately 1.23 megahertz wide, and there are small guard bands at each end of Globalstar's channel plan. Because of this, Globalstar Channel 7 is at 1617.495-1618.725 MHz. Globalstar requests that, if the Commission does not reconsider its decision requiring spectrum sharing in the 1618.25-1621.35 MHz segment, that it move the lower boundary of the shared segment from 1618.25 MHz to 1618.725 MHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-43A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-43A1.txt
  • seq. and 50 U.S.C. § 1841 et seq.; (iv) acquisition of location- related information concerning a service subscriber or facility; (v) preservation of any of the above information pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2703(f); and (vi) access to, or acquisition or interception of, or preservation of communications or information as described in (i) through (ii) above and comparable State laws. 1.23. "Network Management Information" means: network plans, processes and procedures; placement of Network Operating Center(s) and linkages to other domestic and international 5 carriers, ISPs or other critical infrastructures; descriptions of any IP networks and operations processes and procedures related to backbone infrastructure(s); description of any proprietary control mechanisms and operating and administrative software; and all network performance information. 1.24. "Party"
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-126A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-126A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-126A1.txt
  • IVDS) 3 10 1,650 1,772 59 60 1,800 Marine (Ship) 8,400 10 800,000 859,278 10 10 840,000 GMRS 14,000 5 400,000 429,639 6 5 350,000 Aviation (Aircraft) 7,500 10 440,000 472,603 6 5 375,000 Marine (Coast) 310 10 108,000 116,003 37 35 108,500 Aviation (Ground) 1,700 10 165,000 177,226 10 10 170,000 Amateur Vanity Call Signs 15,000 10 171,990 184,734 1.23 1.23 184,500 AM Class A 65 1 210,800 227,451 3,499 3,500 227,500 AM Class B 1,564 1 2,546,375 2,742,431 1,753 1,750 2,737,000 AM Class C 935 1 890,150 965,321 1,032 1,025 958,375 AM Class D 1,706 1 2,983,750 3,240,539 1,899 1,900 3,241,400 FM Classes A, B1 & C3 3,040 1 6,281,025 6,800,861 2,237 2,225 6,764,000 FM Classes B, C, C0,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-182A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-182A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-182A1.txt
  • IVDS) 3 10 1,650 1,772 59 60 1,800 Marine (Ship) 8,400 10 800,000 859,278 10 10 840,000 GMRS 14,000 5 400,000 429,639 6 5 350,000 Aviation (Aircraft) 7,500 10 440,000 472,603 6 5 375,000 Marine (Coast) 310 10 108,000 116,003 37 35 108,500 Aviation (Ground) 1,700 10 165,000 177,226 10 10 170,000 Amateur Vanity Call Signs 15,000 10 171,990 184,734 1.23 1.23 184,500 AM Class A 65 1 210,800 227,355 3,498 3,500 227,500 AM Class B 1,564 1 2,546,375 2,740,081 1,752 1,750 2,737,000 AM Class C 935 1 890,150 963,919 1,031 1,025 958,375 AM Class D 1,706 1 2,983,750 3,237,984 1,898 1,900 3,241,400 FM Classes A, B1 & C3 3,040 1 6,281,025 6,788,261 2,233 2,225 6,764,000 FM Classes B, C, C0,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-233A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-233A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-233A1.txt
  • Opp., supra; and USTelecom Opp., supra. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.461(i)(1) and (2) and 0.461(j). See also 0.461(d)(3) (FOIA requests for records submitted to the Commission with a request for confidentiality are provided ``to the person who originally submitted the materials to the Commission'' for a response). See 47 C.F.R. § 0.461(d)(3). 47 C.F.R. § 1.22; see 47 C.F.R. § 1.23(b). We note, however, that CTIA and USTelecom participated in the Part 4 Rules proceeding. See Part 4 Rules, App. A, 19 FCC Rcd at 16918. See USTelecom Opp. at 1 (USTelecom files its opposition ``on behalf of its members'' which ``include service providers that are subject to the Commission's outage reporting requirements''). See CTIA Opp. at 1 (CTIA ``is an
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-38A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-38A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-38A1.txt
  • (per license) (47 CFR part 95) 5 Rural Radio (47 CFR part 22) (previously listed under the Land Mobile category) 20 PLMRS (Shared Use) (per license) (47 CFR part 90) 20 Aviation (Aircraft) (per station) (47 CFR part 87) 5 Aviation (Ground) (per license) (47 CFR part 87) 10 Amateur Vanity Call Signs (per call sign) (47 CFR part 97) 1.23 CMRS Mobile/Cellular Services (per unit) (47 CFR parts 20, 22, 24, 27, 80 and 90) .17 CMRS Messaging Services (per unit) (47 CFR parts 20, 22, 24 and 90) .08 Broadband Radio Service (formerly MMDS/ MDS) (per license sign) (47 CFR part 21) Local Multipoint Distribution Service (per call sign) (47 CFR, part 101) 295 295 AM Radio Construction Permits
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-62A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-62A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-62A1.txt
  • (per license) (47 CFR part 95) 5 Rural Radio (47 CFR part 22) (previously listed under the Land Mobile category) 20 PLMRS (Shared Use) (per license) (47 CFR part 90) 20 Aviation (Aircraft) (per station) (47 CFR part 87) 5 Aviation (Ground) (per license) (47 CFR part 87) 10 Amateur Vanity Call Signs (per call sign) (47 CFR part 97) 1.23 CMRS Mobile/Cellular Services (per unit) (47 CFR parts 20, 22, 24, 27, 80 and 90) .17 CMRS Messaging Services (per unit) (47 CFR parts 20, 22, 24 and 90) .08 Broadband Radio Service (formerly MMDS/ MDS) (per license sign) (47 CFR part 21) Local Multipoint Distribution Service (per call sign) (47 CFR, part 101) 295 295 AM Radio Construction Permits
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-183A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-183A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-183A1.txt
  • 2,252 2,309 Operating Expenses 1,968 1,633 593 584 Interest Expense 1,363 1,379 291 316 Net Gain or Loss (782) (508) 664 648 Cash Flow 876 1,018 1,496 1,472 EBITDA 1,391 1,723 1,659 1,724 Free Cash Flow (163) 31 448 259 EBIT 545 912 1,659 1,725 Operating Profit (259) 113 979 1,031 Ratios Debt/EBIDTA 10.9 9.3 2.99 2.91 EBITDA/Interest Expense 1.02 1.23 5.33 5.38 Government credit guarantees also play a role in the fixed-satellite industry. For example, France's export-credit agency Coface (the French counterpart of the Export-Import Bank of the United States), has been active in providing export credit facilities for SES (as well as Globalstar and Iridium). Other innovations in funding commercial spacecraft include contracting with a government partner, such as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-183A1_Rcd.pdf
  • 2,252 2,309 Operating Expenses 1,968 1,633 593 584 Interest Expense 1,363 1,379 291 316 Net Gain or Loss (782) (508) 664 648 Cash Flow236 876 1,018 1,496 1,472 EBITDA 1,391 1,723 1,659 1,724 Free Cash Flow237 (163) 31 448 259 EBIT238 545 912 1,659 1,725 Operating Profit239 (259) 113 979 1,031 Ratios Debt/EBIDTA240 10.9 9.3 2.99 2.91 EBITDA/Interest Expense241 1.02 1.23 5.33 5.38 234 Intelsat 10-K, 2009, 2010; SES, Annual Report, 2009, 2010. 235 Data for SES converted from Euros using the average annual exchange rate given at http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g5a/current/. 236 From operating activities. 237 Operating cash flow minus capital expenditures 238 Revenues minus operating expenses. 239 EBIT minus depreciation and amortization. 240 The total debt to EBIDTA (Earnings Before Interest, Depreciation,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc01001.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc01001.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc01001.txt
  • at 50-55; and 2000 at 40-42. TABLE C-3 1999 Concentration in the National Market for Purchase of Video Programming(1) Rank Company Percent of Subscribers(2) 1 AT&T 19.07 2 Time Warner 14.92 3 DirecTV 10.28 4 Comcast 8.43 Top 4 52.70 5 Charter 7.36 6 Cox 7.27 7 Adelphia 5.94 8 EchoStar 5.11 Top 8 78.38 9 Cablevision 4.29 10 Insight 1.23 Top 10 83.90 Top 25 89.75 Top 50 92.14 HHI 954(3) Notes: MSO subscriber totals as of June 1999, and reported in Top Cable System Operators as of June 2000, Paul Kagan Associates, Inc., Cable TV Investor, October 10, 2000, at 12-13. There is no double counting of subscribers. If a cable operator is partially owned by more than one
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2001/fcc01329.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2001/fcc01329.txt
  • NY Fox, Craig 1990 Sep-97 0 0.4 0 A WKRL FM Modern Rock Syracuse, NY 78 N. Syracuse NY Galaxy Communications 1972 Feb-94 1600 4.4 0.91 A WTLA AM Adlt Stndrd Syracuse, NY 78 N. Syracuse NY Galaxy Communications 1959 Feb-94 200 1 0.36 B WTKW FM Clsc Rock Syracuse, NY 78 Bridgeport NY Galaxy Communications 1992 Aug-94 1800 3.5 1.23 A WSGO AM Adlt Stndrd Syracuse, NY 78 Oswego NY Galaxy Communications 1960 Dec-95 0 0 0 B WTKV FM Clsc Rock Syracuse, NY 78 Oswego NY Galaxy Communications 1973 Dec-95 0 1.7 0 A WZUN FM AC Syracuse, NY 78 Phoenix NY Galaxy Communications 1995 Dec-00 300 2.1 0.18 A WSCP AM Country Syracuse, NY 78 Sandy Creek NY
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
  • PR-2-04-2100 Average Interval Completed - Dispatch (6-9 Lines) 3.5 7.67 3.2 4.5 a,b PR-2-05-2100 Average Interval Completed - Dispatch (>= 10 Lines) NA NA 5 NA PR-4 - Missed Appointments PR-4-02-2100 Average Delay Days ­ Total 8.25 13 10.69 5.67 7.82 5 6.13 16 7.14 1 a,b,c,d,e PR-4-03-2100 % Missed Appointment ­ Customer 1.7 4.4 1.48 2.64 1.29 3.59 1.21 1.23 PR-4-04-2100 % Missed Appointment ­ Verizon ­ Dispatch 9.1 6.25 6.41 5.56 10.86 4.44 11.64 5 7.42 3.45 PR-4-05-2100 % Missed Appointment ­ Verizon ­ No Dispatch 0.28 0 0.04 0 0.07 0 0.03 0 0.02 0 PR-4-08-2100 % Missed Appt. ­ Customer ­ Late Order Conf. 0 0 PR-6 - Installation Quality PR-6-01-2100 % Installation Troubles reported within 30
• http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-99-55A1.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-99-55A1.pdf
  • new or modified reporting and recordkeeping requirements or burdens on the public. Implementation of these new or modified reporting and recordkeeping requirements will be subject to approval by the Office of Management and Budget as prescribed by the Act. 1.22 The Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. § 604, is contained in Appendix B. 1.23 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in Sections 4(i), 4(j), 303, 308 and 309 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 4(i), 4(j), 303, 308 and 309, Sections 73.3517, 73.3571, 73.3573 and 74.1233 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 73.3517, 73.3571, 73.3573 and 74.1233, ARE AMENDED as set forth in Appendix
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Databases/documents_collection/75-946.html
  • the Commission denied that request. The FCC's policy toward religious broadcasters remains unchanged in that no special provisions or restrictions are applied to religious stations or licensees, nor are any changes to that policy contemplated. ] [ The HTML excerpts contained below can be retrieved at [1]http://www.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Databases/documents_collec tion/75-946.html. The entire Memorandum Opinion and Order is available as a PDF file (1.23 MB in size) at [2]http://www.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Databases/documents_collec tion/75-946.pdf. ] BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 [ 54 FCC 2d 941 ] FCC 75-946 In the Matter of Revision of the Rules Permitting Multiple Ownership of Non-Commercial Educational Radio and Television Stations in Single Markets; and Request for "Freeze" on All Applications By Government Owned and Controlled Groups for Reserved Educational
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/materials/already-released/consumer090002.pdf
  • 18844 1 824 Notes: Log scales for population on the horizontal axis and the number of outlets in each medium on the vertical axis. See text for explanation. 46 Table 1: Television Outlets, 1994-2000 year N uhf vhf uhf+vhf network indep. public net+ind+pub 1994207 2.29 2.63 2.46 1995207 2.96 2.29 5.25 2.72 2.52 1.71 6.96 1996207 3.09 2.34 5.43 4.20 1.23 1.71 7.14 1997207 3.19 2.35 5.54 4.29 1.25 1.71 7.25 1998207 3.37 2.37 5.74 4.74 1.40 1.72 7.87 1999207 3.54 2.37 5.91 4.94 1.46 2000207 3.65 2.39 6.04 5.02 1.57 1.73 8.32 linked sample year N uhf vhf uhf+vhf network indep. public net+ind+pub 1994 2.64 2.88 3.33 1995143 3.76 2.63 6.38 3.01 3.37 2.04 8.42 1996143 3.88 2.68 6.56 4.85
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/23/charts/23press2.pdf
  • 24 37 30 $56,500,000.00 $40,261,800.00 52 1.52 1 15.64 25 33 31 $57,642,000.00 $40,739,500.00 50 1.48 1 17.52 26 28 27 $58,697,000.00 $41,353,000.00 47 1.41 1 13.20 27 15 15 $59,604,000.00 $41,253,050.00 45 1.40 1 7.44 28 8 8 $59,982,000.00 $41,588,550.00 45 1.39 1 3.44 29 19 19 $60,146,000.00 $40,974,100.00 43 1.35 1 14.11 30 17 17 $60,624,000.00 $42,081,250.00 43 1.23 2 7.10 31 18 18 $61,782,000.00 $42,504,850.00 41 1.19 2 8.40 32 13 13 $62,489,000.00 $43,727,700.00 41 1.17 2 5.41 33 9 9 $62,960,000.00 $43,719,000.00 40 1.16 2 5.04 34 7 7 $63,386,000.00 $44,065,500.00 40 1.15 2 4.08 35 13 12 $63,847,000.00 $44,296,100.00 40 1.08 3 5.04 36 6 6 $64,203,000.00 $44,491,900.00 40 1.06 3 2.72 37 3 3 $64,447,000.00
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/conferences/combin2001/papers/vsmith.pdf
  • and 7 show the various boundary environments we tested using ten licenses (A through J). Actual parameters for these experiments also can be found at the site, http://linus.econlab.arizona.edu/FCC_Parameters In Figure 6 we see that bidder 6 had the large package and was either in the winning set or not with package F,G (own effect). The Gain was either lowest at 1.23 (430/350) or highest at 1.43 (430/301). In Figure 7 we divided the licenses into two groups with various own and gain effects. For licenses A-E we had several bidders with values for the entire license group from A to E, while some of them had values for packages that were part of the optimal allocation set. In the second group
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/data/papersAndStudies/fc99136.pdf
  • B, Table 9B, p. B-12. 28 Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-136 cellular operators increased their penetration rates on average by 1.55 percent and 1.68 percent in 1995 and 1996 respectively. However, in 1997, the increase in cellular operators' average penetration rates dropped by 12 percent, down to 1.48 percent. In 1998, their increase in average penetration decreased again, down to 1.23 percent. b. Response to Competition The efforts of cellular operators, discussed in the Third Report,146 to increase their capacity and expand their service offerings by deploying digital technologies has continued during the past year. To track these digital rollouts, the Commission has compiled a list of MSAs and RSAs with some level of digital coverage by the incumbent cellular operators.
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/rss/index.htm?job=ainf&id=62
  • = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=62T ue, 24 Jan 2006 10:35:02 EST Summary Permits: Auction No. 62 will offer 171 construction permits in the FM Broadcast service for stations throughout the United States and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Qualified Bidders: 214 Rounds Completed: 27 Bidding Days: 8 Results for Round 27 Gross Revenue: $62,699,700.00 - Dollar Change: 761800.00 - % Change: 1.23 Net Revenue: $48,175,550.00 - Dollar Change: 1336110.00 - % Change: 2.85 New Bids: 66 Withdrawn Bids: 0 Proactive Waivers: 4 Bidders that Reduced Eligibility: 10 Permits with PWBs*: 170 FCC Held Permits: 1 Eligible Bidders: 134 (of 214 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=62T ue, 24 Jan 2006 11:50:03 EST Summary Permits: Auction No. 62 will offer
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/rss/index.htm?job=ainf&id=66
  • Auction No. 66 will offer 1,122 licenses: 36 Regional Economic Area Grouping (REAG) licenses, 352 Economic Area (EA) licenses, and 734 Cellular Market Area (CMA) licenses. Qualified Bidders: 168 Rounds Completed: 22 Bidding Days: 7 Results for Round 22 Gross Revenue: $10,746,245,900.00 - Dollar Change: 212207000.00 - % Change: 2.01 Net Revenue: $10,490,465,900.00 - Dollar Change: 127796650.00 - % Change: 1.23 New Bids: 264 Withdrawn Bids: 0 Proactive Waivers: 1 Bidders that Reduced Eligibility: 7 Licenses with PWBs*: 837 FCC Held Licenses: 285 Eligible Bidders: 141 (of 168 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=66T hu, 17 Aug 2006 16:50:00 GMT Summary Licenses: Auction No. 66 will offer 1,122 licenses: 36 Regional Economic Area Grouping (REAG) licenses, 352 Economic
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc01001.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc01001.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc01001.txt
  • at 50-55; and 2000 at 40-42. TABLE C-3 1999 Concentration in the National Market for Purchase of Video Programming(1) Rank Company Percent of Subscribers(2) 1 AT&T 19.07 2 Time Warner 14.92 3 DirecTV 10.28 4 Comcast 8.43 Top 4 52.70 5 Charter 7.36 6 Cox 7.27 7 Adelphia 5.94 8 EchoStar 5.11 Top 8 78.38 9 Cablevision 4.29 10 Insight 1.23 Top 10 83.90 Top 25 89.75 Top 50 92.14 HHI 954(3) Notes: MSO subscriber totals as of June 1999, and reported in Top Cable System Operators as of June 2000, Paul Kagan Associates, Inc., Cable TV Investor, October 10, 2000, at 12-13. There is no double counting of subscribers. If a cable operator is partially owned by more than one
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2002/fcc02331.pdf
  • CLEC Notes Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-331 Florida Performance Metric Data A.2.1.1.1.2Residence/<10 circuits/Non- Dispatch/FL (days) 0.86 0.70 0.84 0.88 0.83 0.83 0.81 0.77 1.00 0.73 A.2.1.1.2.1Residence/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 4.64 4.00 4.68 4.33 4.86 5.00 4.64 4.00 4.25 4.00 1,2,3,4,5 A.2.1.2.1.1Business/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 3.54 3.25 6.02 4.10 6.40 4.08 4.92 4.49 5.88 5.56 A.2.1.2.1.2Business/<10 circuits/Non- Dispatch/FL (days) 1.29 0.94 1.22 1.08 1.23 0.96 1.25 0.84 1.28 0.92 A.2.1.2.2.1Business/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 10.28 8.57 11.50 5.25 12.35 9.50 14.71 3.33 13.70 6.60 1,2,3,4,5 A.2.1.2.2.2Business/>=10 circuits/Non- Dispatch/FL (days) 4.07 7.00 13.72 5.50 0.52 1.00 7.00 0.83 1,2,4 A.2.1.3.1.1Design (Specials)/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 21.96 10.11 23.01 6.62 23.84 12.49 26.81 10.74 23.69 2.50 1 A.2.1.3.1.2Design (Specials)/<10 circuits/Non- Dispatch/FL (days) 10.98 4.13 8.45 4.50 8.97 3.58 7.29 4.56
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/pntris04.pdf
  • Vermont 1986 3.50 75.3% 84.6% 93.4% 9.3% * 8.9%* 91.5% 93.9% 96.9% 2.4% 3.0% Virginia 1988 3.36 80.4% 84.7% 87.3% 4.3% 2.7% 93.2% 93.6% 94.3% 0.5% 0.6% Washington 1987 1.90 82.7% 89.0% 87.5% 6.3% * -1.6% 92.9% 96.1% 94.9% 3.2% * -1.2% West Virginia 1986 2.64 75.7% 83.8% 91.6% 8.1% * 7.8%* 87.3% 93.6% 94.6% 6.3% * 1.0% Wisconsin 1991 1.23 88.4% 87.8% 92.5% -0.6% 4.7% 96.0% 96.4% 96.0% 0.4% -0.3% Wyoming 1991 3.50 74.2% 89.5% 88.7% 15.2% * -0.8% 89.2% 94.9% 95.8% 5.7% * 0.9% Households with income under $10,000 expressed in March 1984 dollars. * Increase is statistically significant at the 95% confidence level. # Decrease is statistically significant at the 95% confidence level. Note: Changes may not appear
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • 15), 1990-2001...........................................32 Table 1.20 Connection Charges for Three PBX Trunks in the Sample Cities (As of October 15), 1990-2001.....................34 B. Toll Service Rates...........................................................................................................36 Table 1.21 Basic Schedule Rates of AT&T, WorldCom, and Sprint for Residential Customers for a 10-Minute Day Call...........................37 Table 1.22 Basic Schedule Rates of AT&T, WorldCom, and Sprint for Residential Customers for a 10-Minute Evening Call..........................38 Table 1.23 Basic Schedule Rates of AT&T, WorldCom, and Sprint for Residential Customers for a 10-Minute Night/Weekend Call..............39 Table 1.24 AT&T Basic Schedule Residential Rates for 10-minute Interstate InterLATA Calls, 1927-2001............................................40 Table 1.25 Average Long Distance Bills for Price-Sensitive Residential Callers....................................................41 Table 1.26 Average Revenue per Minute for Interstate Toll Service Calls..............................................................42 C. Additional Sources of Information on Local and Toll Rates..............................................43
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • PBX Trunk (As of October 15), 1990-2002 Table 1.20 Connection Charges for Three PBX Trunks in the Sample Cities (As of October 15), 1999 -2002 Table 1.21 Basic Schedule Rates of AT&T, WorldCom, and Sprint for Residential Customers for a 10-Minute Day, Evening, and Night Call Table 1.22 AT&T Basic Schedule Residential Rates for 10-minute Interstate InterLATA Calls, 1927-2002 Table 1.23 Average Revenue per Minute for Interstate Toll Service Calls II. Expenditures on Telephone Service .........................................................II-1 A. Residential Expenditures..................................................................II-1 B. Business Expenditures.....................................................................II-2 C. Additional Sources of Information on Expenditures for Telephone Service......II-2 Table 2.1 Average Annual Household Expenditures by Household Location Table 2.2 Average Annual Household Expenditures by Race and National Origin Table 2.3 Average Annual Household Expenditures by Household Income
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.39 2.48 2.57 3.03 3.94 4.28 Total Monthly Charge $17.70$18.18$18.11$19.05$19.24$19.77$19.72$19.95$19.81$20.01$19.95$19.88$19.76$19.93 $20.78 $22.62 $24.07 $24.75 Basic Connection Charge 4 45.63 44.04 42.94 43.06 43.06 42.00 41.50 41.38 41.28 40.91 41.11 41.04 41.24 41.26 41.45 40.02 39.83 39.35 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.34 1.31 1.55 1.76 1.77 1.27 1.22 1.23 0.85 0.23 0.23 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 1.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $40.76 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.39 2.48 2.57 3.03 3.94 4.12 3.97 Total Monthly Charge $17.70$18.18$18.11$19.05$19.24$19.77$19.72$19.95$19.81$20.01$19.95$19.88$19.76$19.93 $20.78 $22.62 $24.07 $24.52 $24.31 Basic Connection Charge 4 45.63 44.04 42.94 43.06 43.06 42.00 41.50 41.38 41.28 40.91 41.11 41.04 41.24 41.26 41.45 40.02 39.83 39.22 39.26 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.34 1.31 1.55 1.76 1.77 1.27 1.22 1.23 0.85 0.23 0.23 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.59 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref97.pdf
  • 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.41 1.52 Monthly charge for optional extended area service n.a. n.a. 0.96 0.98 1.01 1.02 0.88 0.93 0.94 0.97 Basic connection charge 45.6344.0442.9442.7143.06 42.0041.5241.3841.2640.91 Taxes 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.24 2.32 2.19 2.18 2.21 2.27 2.42 Total for rotary service 47.9146.2445.0544.9545.38 44.1943.7043.5943.5343.33 Additional connection charge for touch-tone 1.34 1.31 1.55 1.47 1.77 1.27 1.23 1.23 0.85 0.26 service (including taxes) Additional charge if drop line and connection block n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.11 6.07 6.89 6.50 7.29 5.87 5.90 needed 18 1991, and to $0.48 in October 1995. As of October 1995, there were no monthly charges for touch-tone service in 53 of the sample cities, up from 7 sample cities in 1990. Consumers can
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • a PBX Trunk, 1989-1997...................31 iii Table 1.19 Monthly Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a PBX Trunk, 1990-1997........32 Table 1.20 Connection Charges in the Sample Cities for Three PBX Trunks, 1990-1997...............34 B. Rates in Rural Areas.........................................36 Table 1.21 Average Monthly Rates of RUS Borrowers by State, 1996...................37 Table 1.22 Average Monthly Rates of RUS Borrowers, 1994-1996.....................38 Table 1.23 Average Monthly Rates of RUS Borrowers by the Number of Lines Served, 1996..........38 Table 1.24 Average Monthly Rates of RUS Borrowers by the Number of Exchanges Served, 1996.....38 C. Additional Sources of Information on Local Rates...................39 II. Toll Rates.....................................................40 A. Residential Rates............................................40 Table 2.1 Residential Basic Schedule Rates of AT&T, MCI, and Sprint for a 10-minute Day Call............42 Table 2.2
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • a PBX Trunk, 1989-1998..................31 ii Table 1.19 Monthly Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a PBX Trunk, 1990-1998.......32 Table 1.20 Connection Charges in the Sample Cities for Three PBX Trunks, 1990-1998..............34 B. Rates in Rural Areas.....................................36 Table 1.21 Average Monthly Rates of RUS Borrowers by State, 1997.................37 Table 1.22 Average Monthly Rates of RUS Borrowers, 1994-1997....................38 Table 1.23 Average Monthly Rates of RUS Borrowers by the Number of Lines Served, 1997........39 Table 1.24 Average Monthly Rates of RUS Borrowers by the Number of Exchanges Served, 1997....40 C. Additional Sources of Information on Local Rates.................41 II. Toll Rates.................................................42 A. Residential Rates........................................42 Table 2.1 Residential Basic Schedule Rates of AT&T, MCI, and Sprint for a 10-minute Day Call...........44 Table 2.2
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror02.pdf
  • 11.31 9.58 24.56 15.09 22.17 29Gulf Telephone Company 13.31 11.39 15.73 11.68 17.13 15.16 30Hargray Telephone Company 9.23 14.30 6.94 (0.03) 9.25 5.09 31Home Telephone Company, Inc 9.63 11.77 14.97 (0.21) 6.17 0.91 32Horry Telephone Cooperative, Inc 10.83 11.80 14.90 9.39 6.68 7.77 33Illinois Consolidated Telephone Company 23.60 9.37 10.77 6.80 30.67 23.49 34Lancaster Telephone Company 8.97 12.10 (1.64) 8.74 1.23 7.58 35Moultrie Independent Telephone Company (13.34) 13.35 (36.72) (27.70) 71.70 (3.17) 36Odin Telephone Exchange, Inc. 17.25 67.94 1.26 39.19 5.84 37Puerto Rico Telephone Company 9.67 8.59 54.33 16.14 (52.54) 5.54 7.98 38Rock Hill Telephone Company 10.20 12.02 5.42 13.17 0.09 9.37 39Roseville Telephone Company 15.60 12.15 17.44 28.99 19.54 22.98 40Taconic Telephone Corporation 13.65 14.15 17.52 11.31 (2,025.00) 17.47 12.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
  • 14.62 (56.97) 9.96 12.29 48GTE SOUTHWEST INCORPORATED - AR/NE/OK/TX 10.86 10.56 (1.05) 12.78 (1,434.89) 17.14 14.05 49CAROLINA TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY 13.73 11.54 15.53 14.73 16.91 15.92 50UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF FLORIDA 12.80 11.80 7.74 19.36 (131.63) 8.43 15.60 51UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF INDIANA, INC. 13.78 10.85 13.68 15.10 655.22 24.06 18.49 52UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF NEW JERSEY 11.85 12.02 1.23 16.82 60.05 4.99 13.34 53UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF OHIO 11.64 9.47 12.81 18.53 1,241.82 9.24 13.75 54UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF PENNSYLVANIA 12.54 12.63 4.02 16.53 294.79 11.69 14.61 55UNITED TELEPHONE CO. OF THE NORTHWEST 14.49 12.19 7.20 19.21 566.04 19.08 19.34 56UNITED TELEPHONE SYSTEM - MIDWEST GROUP 11.56 11.35 2.85 14.92 49.15 10.83 13.32 57UNITED TELEPHONE SYSTEM - SOUTHEAST GROUP
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-95.pdf
  • NEW YORK 96.82 1.03 NORTH CAROLINA 83.60 1.20 NORTH DAKOTA 70.80 1.41 OHIO 86.60 1.15 OKLAHOMA 88.72 1.13 OREGON 91.84 1.09 PENNSYLVANIA 94.80 1.05 RHODE ISLAND 100.00 1.00 SOUTH CAROLINA 74.74 1.34 SOUTH DAKOTA 77.77 1.29 TENNESSEE 87.77 1.14 TEXAS 93.88 1.07 UTAH 95.56 1.05 VERMONT 84.27 1.19 VIRGINIA 97.38 1.03 WASHINGTON 91.13 1.10 WEST VIRGINIA 83.52 1.20 WISCONSIN 81.43 1.23 WYOMING 83.04 1.20 Weighted Average 92.60 1.08 -10 Table 4 Local Exchange Except Wireless Basic Misc Rev Basic and Misc Rev Basic and Misc Rev Allocation Intrastate Local Interstate Local Total Local SOCC, 2.13 SOCC 2.13 SOCC Adjusted Percentage Exch, TRS Exch, TRS Exch, TRS (millions) (millions) (millions) (millions) (millions) (millions) (millions) ALABAMA $774 $74 $848 $926 1.74 $956 $21
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-96.pdf
  • Support Net Difference Payments Old System Less New System Less New System Contributions Contributions Less Old System New System Old System ALABAMA $1.42 $0.94 $0.47 $0.92 $0.49 $0.02 ALASKA 13.89 0.75 13.13 1.11 12.77 (0.36) ARIZONA 0.97 1.01 (0.04) 1.20 (0.24) (0.19) ARKANSAS 4.48 0.94 3.54 0.98 3.50 (0.04) CALIFORNIA 0.47 0.91 (0.44) 0.73 (0.26) 0.18 COLORADO 1.56 1.03 0.52 1.23 0.32 (0.20) CONNECTICUT 0.18 1.08 (0.90) 1.24 (1.06) (0.16) DELAWARE 0.00 1.03 (1.02) 1.20 (1.20) (0.18) DIST. OF COLUMBIA 0.03 0.96 (0.93) 0.99 (0.96) (0.04) FLORIDA 0.23 0.99 (0.75) 1.03 (0.79) (0.04) GEORGIA 1.39 0.97 0.42 1.14 0.25 (0.17) HAWAII 0.14 0.92 (0.79) 0.93 (0.80) (0.01) IDAHO 3.72 1.01 2.71 1.24 2.48 (0.23) ILLINOIS 0.25 0.95 (0.70) 0.86 (0.61) 0.09
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-99.pdf
  • Service Fund. Table 11 (Annual Payments and Contributions in Thousands) Total Monthly per Loop Alabama $87,650 $2.90 $30,116 $1.00 $57,535 $1.90 Alaska 71,240 12.94 5,516 1.00 1 11.94 Arizona 35,414 0.99 45,109 1.27 -9,695 -0.27 Arkansas 72,887 4.05 18,481 1.03 54,406 3.02 California 65,692 0.24 207,324 0.76 -141,632 -0.52 Colorado 52,369 1.52 45,410 1.32 6,959 0.20 Connecticut 886 0.03 35,808 1.23 -34,922 -1.20 Delaware 195 0.03 9,067 1.30 -8,872 -1.27 District of Columbia 0 0.00 12,863 1.16 -12,863 -1.16 Florida 50,466 0.37 151,591 1.12 -101,124 -0.75 Georgia 79,527 1.27 72,344 1.16 7,184 0.11 Hawaii 2,055 0.24 8,616 0.99 -6,561 -0.76 Idaho 35,850 4.07 11,253 1.28 24,598 2.80 Illinois 31,393 0.31 98,816 0.99 -67,423 -0.67 Indiana 30,731 0.70 40,985 0.93 -10,254 -0.23
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend100.pdf
  • 5.24¢ 3.10¢ 17.26¢ 01/15/8505/31/85 5.43 5.43 3.10 17.66 06/01/8509/30/85 4.71 4.71 3.10 16.17 10/01/8505/31/86 4.33 4.33 3.10 15.38 06/01/8612/31/86 3.04 4.33 3.10 14.00 01/01/8706/30/87 1.55 4.33 3.10 12.41 07/01/8712/31/87 0.69 4.33 3.10 11.49 01/01/8811/30/88 0.00 4.14 3.10 10.56 12/01/8802/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/8903/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/8912/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/9006/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/9012/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/9106/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/9106/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/9206/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/9306/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/9406/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/9506/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/9606/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/9712/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/9806/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/9812/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/9906/30/99 0.82
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend199.pdf
  • 5.24¢ 3.10¢ 17.26¢ 01/15/8505/31/85 5.43 5.43 3.10 17.66 06/01/8509/30/85 4.71 4.71 3.10 16.17 10/01/8505/31/86 4.33 4.33 3.10 15.38 06/01/8612/31/86 3.04 4.33 3.10 14.00 01/01/8706/30/87 1.55 4.33 3.10 12.41 07/01/8712/31/87 0.69 4.33 3.10 11.49 01/01/8811/30/88 0.00 4.14 3.10 10.56 12/01/8802/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/8903/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/8912/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/9006/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/9012/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/9106/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/9106/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/9206/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/9306/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/9406/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/9506/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/9606/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/9712/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/9806/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/9812/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/9906/30/99 0.82
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • 4.71 3.10 16.17 10/01/85 05/31/86 4.33 4.33 3.10 15.38 06/01/86 12/31/86 3.04 4.33 3.10 14.00 01/01/87 06/30/87 1.55 4.33 3.10 12.41 07/01/87 12/31/87 0.69 4.33 3.10 11.49 01/01/88 11/30/88 0.00 4.14 3.10 10.56 12/01/88 02/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/89 03/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend298.pdf
  • 5.24¢ 3.10¢ 17.26¢ 01/15/8505/31/85 5.43 5.43 3.10 17.66 06/01/8509/30/85 4.71 4.71 3.10 16.17 10/01/8505/31/86 4.33 4.33 3.10 15.38 06/01/8612/31/86 3.04 4.33 3.10 14.00 01/01/8706/30/87 1.55 4.33 3.10 12.41 07/01/8712/31/87 0.69 4.33 3.10 11.49 01/01/8811/30/88 0.00 4.14 3.10 10.56 12/01/8802/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/8903/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/8912/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/9006/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/9012/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/9106/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/9106/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/9206/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/9306/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/9406/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/9506/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/9606/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/9712/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/9806/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/9812/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 SOURCE: FEDERAL-STATE
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend299.pdf
  • 5.24¢ 3.10¢ 17.26¢ 01/15/8505/31/85 5.43 5.43 3.10 17.66 06/01/8509/30/85 4.71 4.71 3.10 16.17 10/01/8505/31/86 4.33 4.33 3.10 15.38 06/01/8612/31/86 3.04 4.33 3.10 14.00 01/01/8706/30/87 1.55 4.33 3.10 12.41 07/01/8712/31/87 0.69 4.33 3.10 11.49 01/01/8811/30/88 0.00 4.14 3.10 10.56 12/01/8802/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/8903/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/8912/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/9006/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/9012/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/9106/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/9106/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/9206/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/9306/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/9406/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/9506/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/9606/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/9712/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/9806/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/9812/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/9906/30/99 0.82
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
  • 4.71 3.10 16.17 10/01/85 05/31/86 4.33 4.33 3.10 15.38 06/01/86 12/31/86 3.04 4.33 3.10 14.00 01/01/87 06/30/87 1.55 4.33 3.10 12.41 07/01/87 12/31/87 0.69 4.33 3.10 11.49 01/01/88 11/30/88 0.00 4.14 3.10 10.56 12/01/88 02/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/89 03/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • 4.71 3.10 16.17 10/01/85 05/31/86 4.33 4.33 3.10 15.38 06/01/86 12/31/86 3.04 4.33 3.10 14.00 01/01/87 06/30/87 1.55 4.33 3.10 12.41 07/01/87 12/31/87 0.69 4.33 3.10 11.49 01/01/88 11/30/88 0.00 4.14 3.10 10.56 12/01/88 02/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/89 03/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • 4.71 3.10 16.17 10/01/85 05/31/86 4.33 4.33 3.10 15.38 06/01/86 12/31/86 3.04 4.33 3.10 14.00 01/01/87 06/30/87 1.55 4.33 3.10 12.41 07/01/87 12/31/87 0.69 4.33 3.10 11.49 01/01/88 11/30/88 0.00 4.14 3.10 10.56 12/01/88 02/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/89 03/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
  • 4.71 3.10 16.17 10/01/85 05/31/86 4.33 4.33 3.10 15.38 06/01/86 12/31/86 3.04 4.33 3.10 14.00 01/01/87 06/30/87 1.55 4.33 3.10 12.41 07/01/87 12/31/87 0.69 4.33 3.10 11.49 01/01/88 11/30/88 0.00 4.14 3.10 10.56 12/01/88 02/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/89 03/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • 4.71 3.10 16.17 10/01/85 05/31/86 4.33 4.33 3.10 15.38 06/01/86 12/31/86 3.04 4.33 3.10 14.00 01/01/87 06/30/87 1.55 4.33 3.10 12.41 07/01/87 12/31/87 0.69 4.33 3.10 11.49 01/01/88 11/30/88 0.00 4.14 3.10 10.56 12/01/88 02/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/89 03/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/89 12/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/90 06/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/90 12/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/91 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd98.pdf
  • 1.98 1.03 0.95 1.17 1.03 1981 995 1,623 992 632 677 619 1.63 1.00 0.63 0.91 0.75 1982 1,253 1,719 1,257 461 819 756 1.37 1.00 0.37 0.92 0.59 1983 1,598 2,148 1,594 553 939 877 1.34 1.00 0.35 0.93 0.56 1984 1,916 2,449 1,809 640 1,047 847 1.28 0.94 0.33 0.81 0.50 1985 2,181 2,679 1,907 772 1,234 1,007 1.23 0.87 0.35 0.82 0.52 1986 2,643 3,054 2,305 749 1,356 1,139 1.16 0.87 0.28 0.84 0.47 1987 3,155 3,656 2,721 934 1,569 1,339 1.16 0.86 0.30 0.85 0.48 1988 3,768 4,446 3,171 1,274 1,901 1,554 1.18 0.84 0.34 0.82 0.50 1989 4,463 5,270 3,649 1,621 2,249 1,789 1.18 0.82 0.36 0.80 0.51 1990 5,276 6,306 4,198 2,109 2,543 2,009 1.20
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd99.pdf
  • 1.98 1.03 0.95 1.17 1.03 1981 995 1,623 992 632 677 619 1.63 1.00 0.63 0.91 0.75 1982 1,253 1,719 1,257 461 819 756 1.37 1.00 0.37 0.92 0.59 1983 1,598 2,148 1,594 553 939 877 1.34 1.00 0.35 0.93 0.56 1984 1,916 2,449 1,809 640 1,047 847 1.28 0.94 0.33 0.81 0.50 1985 2,181 2,679 1,907 772 1,234 1,007 1.23 0.87 0.35 0.82 0.52 1986 2,643 3,054 2,305 749 1,356 1,139 1.16 0.87 0.28 0.84 0.47 1987 3,155 3,656 2,721 934 1,569 1,339 1.16 0.86 0.30 0.85 0.48 1988 3,768 4,446 3,171 1,274 1,901 1,554 1.18 0.84 0.34 0.82 0.50 1989 4,463 5,270 3,649 1,621 2,249 1,789 1.18 0.82 0.36 0.80 0.51 1990 5,276 6,306 4,198 2,109 2,543 2,009 1.20
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd00.pdf
  • 0.31 0.31 0.28 China 1.69 1.79 1.76 2.02 1.80 1.54 1.47 1.28 1.14 0.90 0.73 Colombia 1.13 1.15 1.17 1.15 1.07 1.01 1.00 0.84 0.89 0.77 0.65 Dominican Republic 1.02 1.07 0.99 0.97 0.98 0.83 0.84 0.70 0.57 0.45 0.30 Egypt 1.28 1.31 1.34 1.33 1.35 1.27 1.25 1.04 1.03 0.97 0.81 El Salvador 1.07 1.13 1.15 1.19 1.24 1.20 1.23 1.17 1.08 0.81 0.69 France 1.08 1.08 1.06 1.04 0.99 0.91 0.81 0.62 0.63 0.50 0.35 Germany 15/ 1.06 1.08 1.12 1.08 1.05 0.95 0.88 0.65 0.50 0.40 0.37 Greece 1.09 1.12 1.17 1.17 1.14 1.07 1.10 0.99 0.97 0.80 0.61 Guatemala 1.05 1.08 1.11 1.18 1.19 1.15 1.17 1.07 1.00 0.83 0.67 Haiti 1.06 1.13 1.15 1.21 1.22 1.23
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd01.pdf
  • 0.19 -37.6 China 2.02 1.80 1.54 1.47 1.28 1.14 0.90 0.73 0.48 0.29 0.24 -79.0 Colombia 1.15 1.07 1.01 1.00 0.84 0.89 0.77 0.65 0.43 0.26 0.21 -77.0 Dominican Republic 0.97 0.98 0.83 0.84 0.70 0.57 0.45 0.27 0.25 0.20 0.15 -73.9 Egypt 1.33 1.35 1.27 1.25 1.04 1.03 0.97 0.81 0.70 0.44 0.28 -73.3 El Salvador 1.19 1.24 1.20 1.23 1.17 1.08 0.81 0.69 0.60 0.32 0.28 -74.2 France 1.04 0.99 0.91 0.81 0.62 0.63 0.50 0.35 0.41 0.33 0.22 -65.4 Germany 1.08 1.05 0.95 0.88 0.65 0.50 0.40 0.37 0.33 0.38 0.29 -43.2 Greece 1.17 1.14 1.07 1.10 0.99 0.97 0.80 0.61 0.62 0.25 0.27 -71.7 Guatemala 1.18 1.19 1.15 1.17 1.07 1.00 0.83 0.66 0.63 0.38 0.33 -67.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-1.pdf
  • adjustment formula presented in Table 1.17. Revenues for allocation are the difference between gross access revenues for allocation and subscriber line charge revenues. Allocation percentages in each state are the ratio of the state's allocation revenues to nationwide revenues. Access revenues by type are determined by multiplying the allocation factors by the type of revenues. (See Table 1.14.) In Table 1.23, intrastate access revenues are allocated between states based on intrastate access revenues from Table 2.10 of the 2001/2002 Statistics of Communications Common Carriers. Intrastate access revenues for allocation are the product of these access revenues and the adjustment formula in Table 1.17. Allocation percentage in each state is the ratio of the state's allocation (TRP). Thus, our estimates assume that
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • TEL. CO. 22.62 0.63 21.86 119.10 3 - 181 Table 3.32 High-Cost Loop Support Percentage Changes from 2000 to 2001 by Study Area Unseparated High Cost Study Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Loop Support Area NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* ARIZONA (CONT.) 452175 C CENTURYTEL OF SOUTHWEST, INC.-AZ 21.64 1.23 20.16 62.64 452176 C VALLEY TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC-AZ 21.68 0.34 21.27 39.35 452179 C GILA RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 14.70 1.18 13.36 22.34 452191 C ACCIPITER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 10.34 11.30 -0.86 10.00 452200 C FORT MOJAVE TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 5.12 6.97 -1.72 0.46 452226 C MIDVALE TELEPHONE EXCHANGE, INC.-ARIZONA 36.02 3.25 31.73 51.68 452302 C VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC. - AZ -11.83 2.18
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 2.40 2.42 2.39 2.48 2.57 3.03 3.14 Total Monthly Charge 17.70 18.18 18.11 19.05 19.24 19.77 19.72 19.95 19.81 20.01 19.95 19.88 19.76 19.93 20.78 22.62 23.38 Basic Connection Charge 45.63 44.04 42.94 43.06 43.06 42.00 41.50 41.38 41.28 40.91 41.11 41.04 41.24 41.26 41.45 40.02 39.57 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 1.34 1.31 1.55 1.76 1.77 1.27 1.22 1.23 0.85 0.23 0.23 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 2.70 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 42.39 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-intro.pdf
  • Support Mechanisms ­ Payments per Loop by State ....................... Table 3.16 Income - Net ........................................................................................................... Table 11.5 Information for Allocating CLEC Revenues .............................................. Table 1.19 Information for Allocating Incumbent Local Exchange Revenues .....................Table 1.18 Information for Allocating Interstate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.22 Information for Allocating Interstate Toll Revenues ...................................... Table 1.26 Information for Allocating Intrastate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.23 Information for Allocating LEC Intrastate Toll Revenues ............................... Table 1.24 Information for Allocating Mobile Wireless Revenues .................................. Table 1.20 Information for Allocating Non-LEC Intrastate Toll Revenues ......................... Table 1.25 Information for Allocating SLC Revenues ................................................. Table 1.21 Installation, Maintenance, and Customer Complaints ............................................ Table 9.1 Interstate Access Support Payment Projections by Jurisdiction ............................. Table 3.12 3 Index of Tables and
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • are used as weights. We assume that the residential SLC for NECA pool and rate-of-return carriers during the relevant time period was $3.50. 30 The rates of NECA pool carriers and rate-of-return carriers are assumed to be $9.20 per line per month for multiline business, and $5.50 per line per month for residential and single-line business. 1 -12 In Table 1.23, intrastate access revenues are allocated between states based on intrastate access revenues from Table 2.11 of the 2002/2003 Statistics of Communications Common Carriers. Intrastate access revenues for allocation are the product of these access revenues and the adjustment formula in Table 1.17. Allocation percentage in each state is the ratio of the state's allocation revenues to nationwide revenues. Access revenues
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-2.pdf
  • 13.50 13.50 American Samoa 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25 Arizona 8.22 8.25 8.23 0.00 3.50 2.71 0.00 1.75 1.36 8.22 10.00 9.59 8.22 13.50 12.30 Arkansas 7.04 8.25 7.47 0.00 3.50 0.92 0.00 1.75 0.46 7.04 10.00 7.93 7.04 13.50 8.85 California 5.25 8.25 6.66 2.18 3.50 2.46 1.09 1.75 1.23 6.34 10.00 7.89 8.52 13.50 10.35 Colorado 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 3.49 0.00 1.75 1.75 8.25 10.00 10.00 8.25 13.50 13.49 Connecticut 6.10 7.53 7.53 1.18 1.18 1.17 0.59 0.59 0.59 6.69 8.12 8.11 7.87 9.30 9.28 Delaware 8.23 8.23 8.23 2.30 2.30 2.30 1.15 1.15 1.15 9.38 9.38 9.38 11.68 11.68 11.68 District of Columbia 5.62 5.62 5.62
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • 25.94 14.19 10.29 65.18 613002 C BETTLES TELEPHONE CO. INC. 7.20 1.01 6.13 9.80 613003 C BRISTOL BAY TELEPHONE COOP. INC. 2.61 -8.04 11.58 9.46 613004 C BUSH-TELL INC. 11.07 0.40 10.63 16.24 613005 A CIRCLE UTILITIES 14.34 2.44 11.62 24.50 613006 C COPPER VALLEY TEL. COOP. INC. 8.34 -1.98 10.52 10.82 613007 C CORDOVA TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE, INC. -0.90 -2.10 1.23 -6.19 613008 C ACS OF FAIRBANKS, INC. 8.74 -0.11 8.86 36.49 613010 C ACS - NORTHLAND GLACIER STATE 7.20 -0.09 7.30 10.62 613011 C INTERIOR TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. 1.07 2.36 -1.27 -1.40 613011A C INTERIOR TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. 6.31 -6.39 13.58 18.56 613012 C ACS - ALASKA JUNEAU 3.46 -0.69 4.18 0.00 613013 C KETCHIKAN PUBLIC UTILITIES 5.19 -5.57 11.39
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
  • 2.48 2.57 3.03 3.94 4.28 Total Monthly Charge 17.70 18.18 18.11 19.05 19.24 19.77 19.72 19.95 19.81 20.01 19.95 19.88 19.76 19.93 20.78 22.62 24.07 24.75 Basic Connection Charge 45.63 44.04 42.94 43.06 43.06 42.00 41.50 41.38 41.28 40.91 41.11 41.04 41.24 41.26 41.45 40.02 39.83 39.35 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 1.34 1.31 1.55 1.76 1.77 1.27 1.22 1.23 0.85 0.23 0.23 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 **** **** Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 1.41 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 40.76 Additional Charge If Drop Line and
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-9.pdf
  • 26.1 396.8 For Unscheduled Events Over 2 Minutes 23.0 60.8 2.6 0.0 51.7 7.5 210.4 25.3 396.5 For Unscheduled Downtime More Than 2 Minutes Number of Occurrences or Events 23 23 11 0 18 1 24 13 96 Events per Hundred Switches 1.4 1.7 0.8 0.0 1.1 0.6 1.9 1.0 3.1 Events per Million Access Lines 1.04 1.61 0.60 0.00 1.23 0.46 1.45 0.64 5.87 Average Outage Duration in Minutes 27.2 58.2 5.8 NA 79.3 20.0 188.8 43.3 216.6 Average Lines Affected per Event in Thousands 15.9 13.3 21.5 NA 24.1 25.7 25.9 27.8 2.9 Outage Line-Minutes per Event in Thousands 326.7 303.1 117.8 NA 475.7 513.0 5,044.0 812.0 289.1 Outage Line-Minutes per 1,000 Access Lines 338.4 488.3 70.7 0.0 583.7
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-intro.pdf
  • High-Cost Support Mechanisms ­ Monthly Support per Loop by State .............. Table 3.15 Income - Net ........................................................................................................... Table 11.5 Information for Allocating CLEC Revenues .............................................. Table 1.19 Information for Allocating Incumbent Local Exchange Revenues .....................Table 1.18 Information for Allocating Interstate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.22 Information for Allocating Interstate Toll ...................................................Table 1.26 Information for Allocating Intrastate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.23 Information for Allocating LEC Intrastate Toll ............................................ Table 1.24 Information for Allocating Mobile Wireless Revenues .................................. Table 1.20 Information for Allocating Non-LEC Intrastate Toll ......................................Table 1.25 Information for Allocating SLC Revenues ................................................. Table 1.21 Installation, Maintenance, and Customer Complaints ............................................ Table 9.1 3 Index of Tables and Charts Interstate Access Support Payment Projections by State or Jurisdiction ................Table 3.11 Interstate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr97-5.pdf
  • 5.24 3.10 17.26 01/15/8505/31/85 5.43 5.43 3.10 17.66 06/01/8509/30/85 4.71 4.71 3.10 16.17 10/01/8505/31/86 4.33 4.33 3.10 15.38 06/01/8612/31/86 3.04 4.33 3.10 14.00 01/01/8706/30/87 1.55 4.33 3.10 12.41 07/01/8712/31/87 0.69 4.33 3.10 11.49 01/01/8811/30/88 0.00 4.14 3.10 10.56 12/01/8802/14/89 0.00 3.39 3.00 9.60 02/15/8903/31/89 0.00 3.25 3.00 9.46 04/01/8912/31/89 1.00 1.83 3.00 9.11 01/01/9006/30/90 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/9012/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/9106/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/9106/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/9206/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/9306/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/9406/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28 6.89 07/01/9506/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/9606/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 *The weighted average national charges are calculated from the charges of price cap companies and companies in the National Exchange
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-7.pdf
  • 1.57 1.52 1.54 1.52 1.33 1.06 0.97 0.94 0.77 0.44 0.30 0.12 Taxes and 911 Charges 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.44 Total Monthly Charge 17.70 18.18 18.11 19.05 19.24 19.77 19.72 19.95 19.81 20.01 19.95 19.92 Basic Connection Charge $45.63$44.04$42.94$43.06$43.06$42.00$41.50$41.38$41.28$40.91$41.11$41.06 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.34 1.31 1.55 1.76 1.77 1.27 1.22 1.23 0.85 0.23 0.23 0.17 Taxes 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 Total Connection Charge 46.97 45.35 44.49 44.82 44.83 45.57 42.72 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.68 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 Lowest-cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan $0.58 $0.85
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-7.pdf
  • 1.51 1950 19 22 24.1 1.31 1.49 1951 20 22 26.0 1.26 1.38 1952 20 22 26.5 1.24 1.35 1953 21 22 26.7 1.27 1.34 1954 22 22 26.9 1.35 1.33 1955 23 22 26.8 1.40 1.34 1956 23 22 27.2 1.40 1.32 1957 24 22 28.1 1.38 1.28 1958 24 22 28.9 1.35 1.24 1959 24 22 29.1 1.35 1.23 1960 24 22 29.6 1.33 1.21 1961 25 22 29.9 1.36 1.20 1962 25 22 30.2 1.36 1.19 1963 25 22 30.6 1.32 1.17 1964 25 22 31.0 1.31 1.16 1965 24 22 31.5 1.24 1.14 1966 24 22 32.4 1.22 1.11 1967 24 22 33.4 1.18 1.07 1968 24 22 34.8 1.11 1.03 1969 24 22 36.7 1.07 0.98
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-7.pdf
  • Mandatory Payments 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.44 Total Monthly Charge 17.70 18.18 18.11 19.05 19.24 19.77 19.72 19.95 19.81 20.01 19.95 19.88 19.85 Basic Connection Charge 45.63 44.04 42.94 43.06 43.06 42.00 41.50 41.38 41.28 40.91 41.11 41.04 41.31 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.34 1.31 1.55 1.76 1.77 1.27 1.22 1.23 0.85 0.23 0.23 0.17 0.12 Other Mandatory Payments 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.40 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.83 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 Lowest-cost
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.39 2.45 Total Monthly Charge 17.70 18.18 18.11 19.05 19.24 19.77 19.72 19.95 19.81 20.01 19.95 19.88 19.76 19.87 Basic Connection Charge 45.63 44.04 42.94 43.06 43.06 42.00 41.50 41.38 41.28 40.91 41.11 41.04 41.24 41.24 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.34 1.31 1.55 1.76 1.77 1.27 1.22 1.23 0.85 0.23 0.23 0.17 0.12 0.12 Taxes, 911 and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.52 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.88 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • Thousands) Jurisdiction Total Monthly per Loop Alabama $87,650 $2.90 $30,123 $1.00 $57,527 $1.90 Alaska 71,240 12.94 5,518 1.00 $65,722 11.94 American Samoa 591 4.69 0 0.00 591 4.69 Arizona 35,414 0.99 45,121 1.27 -9,707 -0.27 Arkansas 72,887 4.05 18,486 1.03 54,401 3.02 California 65,692 0.24 207,379 0.76 -141,687 -0.52 Colorado 52,369 1.52 45,422 1.32 6,947 0.20 Connecticut 886 0.03 35,817 1.23 -34,932 -1.20 Delaware 195 0.03 9,069 1.30 -8,874 -1.27 District of Columbia 0 0.00 12,867 1.16 -12,867 -1.16 Florida 50,466 0.37 151,631 1.12 -101,164 -0.75 Georgia 79,527 1.27 72,363 1.16 7,165 0.11 Guam 3,266 3.51 672 0.72 2,594 2.79 Hawaii 2,055 0.24 8,618 0.99 -6,564 -0.76 Idaho 35,850 4.07 11,256 1.28 24,595 2.79 Illinois 31,393 0.31 98,842 0.99 -67,450 -0.67
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • Support Mechanisms ­ Net Dollar Flow by State ......................... Table 3.19 Income - Net ........................................................................................................... Table 11.5 Information for Allocating CLEC Revenues .............................................. Table 1.19 Information for Allocating Incumbent Local Exchange Revenues .....................Table 1.18 Information for Allocating Interstate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.22 Information for Allocating Interstate Toll Revenues ...................................... Table 1.26 Information for Allocating Intrastate Access Revenues .................................. Table 1.23 Information for Allocating LEC Intrastate Toll Revenues ............................... Table 1.24 Information for Allocating Mobile Wireless Revenues .................................. Table 1.20 Information for Allocating Non-LEC Intrastate Toll Revenues ......................... Table 1.25 3 Index of Tables and Charts Information for Allocating SLC Revenues ................................................. Table 1.21 Installation, Maintenance, and Customer Complaints ............................................ Table 9.1 Interstate Access Support Mechanism ­ Net Dollar Flow by
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/00socc.pdf
  • North Carolina 76.9 (0.400) 77.3 76.4 0.93 0.93NC North Dakota 7.0 0.310 6.7 5.3 1.39 1.39ND Ohio 152.2 (6.829) 159.0 152.8 6.20 0.288 0.004 0.292 5.91OH Oklahoma 60.6 60.6 60.4 0.16 0.16OK Oregon 55.8 1.225 54.6 47.3 7.29 7.29OR Pennsylvania 321.0 321.0 305.7 15.34 1.021 1.961 2.983 12.36PA Rhode Island 31.7 31.7 31.8 (0.00) (0.00)RI South Carolina 48.9 48.9 47.7 1.23 1.23SC South Dakota 12.1 0.007 12.0 12.0 0.03 0.03SD Tennessee 59.3 59.3 57.3 2.06 2.06TN Texas 246.2 246.2 244.2 1.98 1.98TX Utah 36.0 0.045 35.9 35.6 0.29 0.29UT Vermont 17.4 17.4 17.4 (0.00) (0.00)VT Virginia 64.4 64.4 55.1 9.38 0.735 1.379 2.114 7.27VA Washington 130.9 0.924 129.9 123.5 6.46 6.46WA West Virginia 25.3 25.3 24.6 0.75 0.089 0.175 0.264 0.49WV
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/01socc.pdf
  • 0.048 988.0 988.3 (0.28) (0.28)CA Colorado 35.7 35.7 35.8 (0.02) (0.02)CO Connecticut 198.5 198.5 191.8 6.73 6.73CT Delaware 12.8 12.8 7.5 5.30 1.000 1.883 2.883 2.42DE District of Columbia 2.5 2.5 0.0 2.52 0.327 0.596 0.923 1.60DC Florida 158.2 158.2 157.6 0.62 0.62FL Georgia 105.9 105.9 104.4 1.52 1.52GA Hawaii 8.0 8.0 8.0 0.04 0.04HI Idaho 11.0 0.138 10.8 9.6 1.23 1.23ID Illinois 304.4 304.4 273.3 31.09 31.09IL Indiana 108.3 108.3 94.3 13.97 13.97IN Iowa 18.4 0.099 18.3 17.5 0.82 0.82IA Kansas 40.0 40.0 33.3 6.72 6.72KS Kentucky 30.5 0.470 30.1 29.5 0.59 0.008 0.008 0.58KY Louisiana 38.0 38.0 37.8 0.18 0.18LA Maine 68.0 68.0 68.0 (0.00) (0.00)ME Maryland 58.1 58.1 51.7 6.40 1.175 2.199 3.374 3.02MD Massachusetts 272.3 272.3 272.4
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/02socc.pdf
  • 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 Italy 9/ 2.04 1.65 1.51 1.22 0.71 0.52 0.33 0.22 0.22 0.21 0.20 0.21 0.22 Jamaica 8/ 9/ 1.60 1.55 1.50 1.40 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.25 1.05 0.60 0.38 0.38 0.38 Japan 8/ 9/ 1.62 1.31 1.04 0.94 0.94 0.91 0.86 0.29 0.29 0.27 0.27 0.28 0.29 Korea, Rep. 8/ 9/ 1.90 1.60 1.44 1.41 1.26 1.23 0.98 0.85 0.71 0.51 0.38 0.38 0.38 Mexico 8/ 10/ 0.75 0.72 0.68 0.58 0.53 0.49 0.40 0.37 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 Morocco 9/ 3.58 3.03 3.04 3.27 1.78 1.45 1.09 0.83 0.82 0.77 0.38 0.40 0.41 Netherlands 9/ 1.29 0.69 0.69 0.59 0.37 0.36 0.27 0.19 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.14 Nigeria 9/ 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/03socc.pdf
  • Hong Kong 1.60 1.20 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.79 0.72 India 2.00 1.90 1.80 1.80 1.60 1.42 1.28 1.08 0.85 0.68 0.46 0.46 Israel 2.28 2.16 2.16 1.90 1.18 0.70 0.59 Italy 1.65 1.51 1.22 0.71 0.52 0.33 Jamaica 1.55 1.50 1.40 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.25 1.05 0.60 Japan 1.31 1.04 0.94 0.94 0.91 0.86 Korea, Rep. 1.60 1.44 1.41 1.26 1.23 0.98 0.85 0.71 0.51 Mexico 7/ 0.72 0.68 0.58 0.53 0.485 0.395 0.37 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 Morocco 3.03 3.04 3.27 1.78 1.45 1.09 0.83 0.82 0.77 0.38 Netherlands 0.69 0.69 0.59 0.37 0.36 0.27 Nigeria 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.40 1.15 0.77 0.51 Pakistan 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.20 2.00 1.20 1.20 0.84 0.54 0.42 0.42
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/95socc.pdf
  • (0.19) 2.5 DE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 132.5 64.1 68.5 44.3 24.2 3.77 6.12 10.76 20.65 3.5 DC FLORIDA 776.5 268.0 508.5 458.7 49.8 0.60 (2.03) 0.33 (1.10) 50.9 FL GEORGIA 196.2 72.6 123.7 111.9 11.7 (0.49) 0.19 (0.36) (0.66) 12.4 GA HAWAII 110.6 62.5 48.2 42.6 5.6 0.48 (0.10) 0.27 0.65 4.9 HI IDAHO 5.7 9.5 (3.8) (3.7) (0.1) (1.99) (1.23) (0.64) (3.85) 3.8 ID ILLINOIS 388.1 199.7 188.4 155.9 32.5 (0.92) 0.87 0.76 0.71 31.8 IL INDIANA 257.5 124.4 133.1 118.3 14.8 1.14 (0.12) 0.51 1.54 13.3 IN IOWA 25.2 23.5 1.8 2.5 (0.8) (2.49) (2.10) (2.07) (6.65) 5.9 IA KANSAS 54.2 32.5 21.7 15.9 5.9 0.11 0.07 0.09 0.26 5.6 KS KENTUCKY 105.3 44.3 61.1 54.5 6.6 0.47 (0.45)
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/96socc.pdf
  • LOUISIANA 388.1 1.52 386.6 83.9 302.7 170.5 92.3 38.8 301.7 1.005 LA MAINE 156.0 3.52 152.5 35.1 117.4 42.9 58.5 16.0 117.4 ME MARYLAND 559.5 0.56 558.9 123.5 435.4 206.0 155.3 73.5 434.8 0.677 MD MASSACHUSETTS 851.5 (0.24) 851.7 70.1 781.6 298.0 395.4 88.3 781.6 MA MICHIGAN 967.4 (0.04) 967.5 275.3 692.2 336.3 251.0 104.3 691.5 0.669 MI MINNESOTA 433.0 (1.23) 434.3 116.8 317.4 133.7 126.4 57.3 317.4 MN MISSISSIPPI 249.9 6.70 243.2 31.8 211.4 123.6 64.7 22.4 210.7 0.636 MS MISSOURI 718.6 (1.11) 719.7 201.1 518.6 254.6 164.3 99.6 518.6 MO MONTANA 83.8 0.27 83.6 20.3 63.3 23.4 29.3 10.6 63.3 MT NEBRASKA 220.9 1.27 219.6 76.7 142.9 50.4 62.7 29.9 142.9 NE NEVADA 165.1 8.34 156.8 11.9 144.9 53.8
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/97socc.pdf
  • 0.90 3.6 ME MARYLAND 211.4 107.4 104.0 72.1 31.9 6.78 2.91 4.52 14.21 17.7 MD MASSACHUSETTS 242.7 83.6 159.1 126.0 33.1 3.94 2.83 2.70 9.48 23.6 MA MICHIGAN 295.7 232.4 63.4 46.8 16.6 (1.13) (0.59) (0.09) (1.81) 18.4 MI MINNESOTA 52.1 50.4 1.6 (2.5) 4.2 (2.47) (0.93) (0.95) (4.35) 8.5 MN MISSISSIPPI 39.2 25.8 13.4 10.1 3.3 (1.26) 0.03 0.01 (1.23) 4.5 MS MISSOURI 269.7 230.4 39.3 26.9 12.4 (0.13) (0.39) 0.12 (0.40) 12.8 MO MONTANA (1.8) 6.4 (8.1) (6.7) (1.4) (1.83) (0.80) (0.62) (3.26) 1.8 MT NEBRASKA 133.9 45.6 88.3 66.4 21.9 6.94 4.49 5.94 17.36 4.6 NE NEVADA 95.9 56.2 39.6 31.7 8.0 (0.72) (0.18) 0.03 (0.87) 8.8 NV NEW HAMPSHIRE 37.0 9.8 27.2 21.0 6.2 0.48 0.10 0.19
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/98SOCC.PDF
  • OR COMMONWEALTH OF NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS (CNMI). ** INCLUDING REAL TIME RATED CALLS AND ALL COLLECT CALLS. 229 STATISTICS OF COMMUNICATIONS COMMON CARRIERS TABLE 5.6-AT&T RATES FOR LONG DISTANCE MESSAGE TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE UNITED STATES-OVERSEAS DIAL STATION DIAL STATION COUNTRY STANDARD ECONOMY COUNTRY STANDARD ECONOMY ARGENTINA $2.30 $1.58 JAMAICA $1.90 $1.56 AUSTRALIA 1.80 1.24 JAPAN (INCLUDING OKINAWA) 1.73 1.25 AUSTRIA 1.72 1.23 KOREA, REPUBLIC OF 2.16 1.52 BAHAMAS 1.37 1.10 NETHERLANDS 1.57 1.02 BELGIUM 1.84 1.18 NIGERIA, FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF 2.33 1.84 BERMUDA 1.48 1.23 PAKISTAN 4.92 3.23 BRAZIL 2.19 1.60 PANAMA, REPUBLIC OF 2.09 1.60 CHILE 2.08 1.63 PERU 2.37 1.66 CHINA, PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF 3.10 2.40 PHILIPPINES 2.59 1.74 COLOMBIA 2.22 1.62 POLAND, REPUBLIC OF 1.88 1.51 COSTA RICA 1.96
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/99socc.pdf
  • 90.4 55.3 11.36 12.65 23.80 47.81 7.5DC Florida 965.8 600.9 364.9 291.5 73.4 6.58 (0.91) 2.41 8.08 65.3 FL Georgia 280.4 171.9 108.5 83.0 25.5 3.17 0.58 0.59 4.34 21.2GA Hawaii 137.2 86.0 51.3 44.8 6.5 0.70 (1.06) 0.46 0.09 6.4 HI Idaho 25.3 21.5 3.8 1.7 2.2 (1.26) (0.69) (0.41) (2.36) 4.5 ID Illinois 483.7 333.9 149.8 116.6 33.1 1.23 0.54 0.59 2.36 30.8 IL Indiana 273.5 195.8 77.8 59.1 18.7 2.02 (0.37) 0.81 2.45 16.2 IN Iowa 48.7 41.0 7.7 5.1 2.6 (1.59) (0.75) (0.95) (3.29) 5.9 IA Kansas 174.9 75.3 99.6 94.9 4.8 (0.74) (0.03) (0.00) (0.78) 5.5KS Kentucky 135.1 73.8 61.3 49.3 12.0 1.17 0.39 1.55 10.4KY Louisiana 145.4 68.5 76.9 68.5 8.4 (0.21) (0.07) 0.19 (0.10)
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/prelim02socc.pdf
  • 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 Italy 10/ 2.04 1.65 1.51 1.22 0.71 0.52 0.33 0.22 0.22 0.21 0.20 0.21 0.22 Jamaica 8/ 10/ 1.60 1.55 1.50 1.40 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.25 1.05 0.60 0.38 0.38 0.38 Japan 8/ 10/ 1.62 1.31 1.04 0.94 0.94 0.91 0.86 0.29 0.29 0.27 0.27 0.28 0.29 Korea, Rep. 8/ 10/ 1.90 1.60 1.44 1.41 1.26 1.23 0.98 0.85 0.71 0.51 0.38 0.38 0.38 Mexico 8/ 9/ 0.75 0.72 0.68 0.58 0.53 0.49 0.40 0.37 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 Morocco 10/ 3.58 3.03 3.04 3.27 1.78 1.45 1.09 0.83 0.82 0.77 0.38 0.40 0.41 Netherlands 10/ 1.29 0.69 0.69 0.59 0.37 0.36 0.27 0.19 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.14 Nigeria 10/ 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0175.pdf
  • Fixed Earth Stations Nature of Service:Mobile Satellite Service 31 ° 47 ' 57.50 " N LAT. SITE ID: CLFN-2 Route 2, Box 149AA, Bosque, Clifton, TX 97 ° 36 ' 44.70 " W LONG. LOCATION: Alcatel Clift-RFT2 5.5 meters ANTENNA ID: 9775 55.00 dBW Waveform consists of multiple direct-sequence spread-spectrum channels whose carriers are uniformly spaced. Each CDMA channel is 1.23 Mc/sec. Each CDMA Waveform is QPSK. 5096.0000 - 5250.0000 MHz 1M23G7W Waveform consists of multiple direct-sequence spread-spectrum channels whose carriers are uniformly spaced. Each CDMA channel is 1.23 Mc/sec. Each CDMA Waveform is QPSK. 6900.0000 - 7055.0000 MHz 1M23G7W 59.00 dBW Unmodulated CW for Testing. 5096.0000 - 5250.0000 MHz 50K0N0N Unmodulated CW for Testing. 6900.0000 - 7055.0000 MHz 50K0N0N 59.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2001/fcc01329.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2001/fcc01329.txt
  • NY Fox, Craig 1990 Sep-97 0 0.4 0 A WKRL FM Modern Rock Syracuse, NY 78 N. Syracuse NY Galaxy Communications 1972 Feb-94 1600 4.4 0.91 A WTLA AM Adlt Stndrd Syracuse, NY 78 N. Syracuse NY Galaxy Communications 1959 Feb-94 200 1 0.36 B WTKW FM Clsc Rock Syracuse, NY 78 Bridgeport NY Galaxy Communications 1992 Aug-94 1800 3.5 1.23 A WSGO AM Adlt Stndrd Syracuse, NY 78 Oswego NY Galaxy Communications 1960 Dec-95 0 0 0 B WTKV FM Clsc Rock Syracuse, NY 78 Oswego NY Galaxy Communications 1973 Dec-95 0 1.7 0 A WZUN FM AC Syracuse, NY 78 Phoenix NY Galaxy Communications 1995 Dec-00 300 2.1 0.18 A WSCP AM Country Syracuse, NY 78 Sandy Creek NY
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/da000025.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/da000025.txt
  • reimbursed, as reasonable costs, the attorney's fees it incurred. Murray filed an opposition to Newport's request, citing several alleged deficiencies of a procedural nature in addition to substantive ones. First, Murray argues that neither Media Services nor its COO may be heard by the Commission because neither qualifies as a party in this proceeding. Murray cites Rule Section 1.21(a) and 1.23(a), which state that a party may appear before the Commission in person or through an attorney qualified to practice before it. Murray notes that neither Media Services nor its COO qualifies, and, therefore, neither is properly before the Commission as a representative for Newport. Second, Murray points out that the request is not verified and signed by either the party,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/2000/fcc00365.doc
  • in accordance with any applicable laws, Executive orders, and regulations. 47 CFR § 1.24 Censure, suspension, or disbarment of attorneys. (a) The Commission may censure, suspend, or disbar any person who has practiced, is practicing or holding himself out as entitled to practice before it if it finds that such person: (1) Does not possess the qualifications required by § 1.23; (2) Has failed to conform to standards of ethical conduct required of practitioners at the bar of any court of which he is a member; (3) Is lacking in character or professional integrity; and/or (4) Displays toward the Commission or any of its hearing officers conduct which, if displayed toward any court of the United States or any of its
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/fcc99136.pdf
  • 27, 1999 and Bell Atlantic Corp., INVESTOR'S REFERENCE GUIDE 97 (1998), at 55. 29 their penetration rates on average by 1.55 percent and 1.68 percent in 1995 and 1996 respectively. However, in 1997, the increase in cellular operators' average penetration rates dropped by 12 percent, down to 1.48 percent. In 1998, their increase in average penetration decreased again, down to 1.23 percent. b. Response to Competition The efforts of cellular operators, discussed in the Third Report,146 to increase their capacity and expand their service offerings by deploying digital technologies has continued during the past year. To track these digital rollouts, the Commission has compiled a list of MSAs and RSAs with some level of digital coverage by the incumbent cellular operators.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
  • PR-2-04-2100 Average Interval Completed - Dispatch (6-9 Lines) 3.5 7.67 3.2 4.5 a,b PR-2-05-2100 Average Interval Completed - Dispatch (>= 10 Lines) NA NA 5 NA PR-4 - Missed Appointments PR-4-02-2100 Average Delay Days ­ Total 8.25 13 10.69 5.67 7.82 5 6.13 16 7.14 1 a,b,c,d,e PR-4-03-2100 % Missed Appointment ­ Customer 1.7 4.4 1.48 2.64 1.29 3.59 1.21 1.23 PR-4-04-2100 % Missed Appointment ­ Verizon ­ Dispatch 9.1 6.25 6.41 5.56 10.86 4.44 11.64 5 7.42 3.45 PR-4-05-2100 % Missed Appointment ­ Verizon ­ No Dispatch 0.28 0 0.04 0 0.07 0 0.03 0 0.02 0 PR-4-08-2100 % Missed Appt. ­ Customer ­ Late Order Conf. 0 0 PR-6 - Installation Quality PR-6-01-2100 % Installation Troubles reported within 30
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-264049A1.html
  • amended (``Act''),1 to 2by2security.com for violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and Section 2.803(a)2 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. 2. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that on February 1, 2006, 2by2security.com, on its website, marketed unauthorized radio devices, specifically five models of 900MHz to 1.23 GHz wireless cameras, models LJ109, LJ129, LJ117, LJ118 and LJ119, and associated receivers, which have not been certificated for sale or use in the United States. 3. Section 302(b) of the Act provides that ``[n]o person shall manufacture, import, sell, offer for sale, or ship devices or home electronic equipment and systems, or use devices, which fail to comply with
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-2A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-2A1.pdf
  • Effect of LPFM Entry on the Ratings of Full-Service Commercial FM Stations in all Radio Markets: Format Competition Independent Variable Contour Measure Market Measure Contour/ Market Measure Number of LPFM stations 0.000 (0.31) 0.002 (1.22) -0.007 (2.27)* Number of similar format AM stations in market 0.001 (0.48) 0.001 (0.50) 0.001 (0.46) Number of similar format FM stations in market -0.001 (1.23) -0.001 (1.32) -0.001 (1.14) Number of similar format non-commercial stations in market -0.000 (0.02) 0.000 (0.09) -0.000 (0.12) Number of commercial TV stations in market -0.001 (0.36) -0.002 (0.48) -0.001 (0.20) Digital radio stations in market 0.000 (0.45) 0.000 (0.24) 0.000 (0.74) Retail expenditures in market -0.000 (0.72) -0.000 (0.81) -0.000 (0.53) Population density of market 0.000 (0.16) 0.000 (0.17)
• http://www.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Databases/documents_collection/75-946.html http://www.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Databases/documents_collection/75-946.pdf
  • the Commission denied that request. The FCC's policy toward religious broadcasters remains unchanged in that no special provisions or restrictions are applied to religious stations or licensees, nor are any changes to that policy contemplated. ] [ The HTML excerpts contained below can be retrieved at [1]http://www.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Databases/documents_collec tion/75-946.html. The entire Memorandum Opinion and Order is available as a PDF file (1.23 MB in size) at [2]http://www.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Databases/documents_collec tion/75-946.pdf. ] BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 [ 54 FCC 2d 941 ] FCC 75-946 In the Matter of Revision of the Rules Permitting Multiple Ownership of Non-Commercial Educational Radio and Television Stations in Single Markets; and Request for "Freeze" on All Applications By Government Owned and Controlled Groups for Reserved Educational
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/agree/files/mex-bc/am.pdf
  • 2900 L.55 d (km) 3000 3100 3200 3300 3400 3500 3600 3700 3800 3900 4000 4100 4200 4300 4400 4500 4600 4700. 4800 4900 5000. 5100- 5200 5300 -5400-- 5500 5600 5700 5800 5900 6000 6200 6400 6600 6800 7000 7200 7400 7600 7800 8000 8200 8400 8600 8800 9000 9200 9400 9600 9800 LOOOO Fe (&I 50% 1.43 1.33 1.23 1.15 1.07 1.00 0.94 0.88 0.83 0.79 01.75 0.71 0.67 0.64 0.61 0.58 0.55 0.53 - 0.51 0.48 - 0.46 0.45 0.43. --_ 0.41 - 0.40 .- s. 0.38 -. 0.37. '-. . . ._.. 0.36 0.34 0.33 0.32 0.30 . 0.28 . 0.27 0.25 0.24 0.23 0.22 0.21 0.20 0.19 0.18 0.17 . 0.17 0.16 0.15 0.15 0.14 0.14
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files/ITRND01.pdf
  • 0.19 0.16 -48.4 China 1.80 1.54 1.47 1.28 1.14 0.90 0.73 0.48 0.29 0.24 0.18 -80.5 Colombia 1.07 1.01 1.00 0.84 0.89 0.77 0.65 0.43 0.26 0.21 0.11 -85.2 Dominican Republic 0.98 0.83 0.84 0.70 0.57 0.45 0.27 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.16 -64.7 Egypt 1.35 1.27 1.25 1.04 1.03 0.97 0.81 0.70 0.44 0.28 0.21 -78.8 El Salvador 1.24 1.20 1.23 1.17 1.08 0.81 0.69 0.60 0.32 0.28 0.13 -84.3 France 0.99 0.91 0.81 0.62 0.63 0.50 0.35 0.41 0.33 0.22 0.25 -50.0 Germany 1.05 0.95 0.88 0.65 0.50 0.40 0.37 0.33 0.38 0.29 0.31 -22.1 Greece 1.14 1.07 1.10 0.99 0.97 0.80 0.61 0.62 0.25 0.27 0.23 -71.6 Guatemala 1.19 1.15 1.17 1.07 1.00 0.83 0.66 0.63 0.38 0.33 0.21
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/peer_review/prlpfm_rpt_economic_study.pdf
  • Effect of LPFM Entry on the Ratings of Full-Service Commercial FM Stations in all Radio Markets: Format Competition Independent Variable Contour Measure Market Measure Contour/ Market Measure Number of LPFM stations 0.000 (0.31) 0.002 (1.22) -0.007 (2.27)* Number of similar format AM stations in market 0.001 (0.48) 0.001 (0.50) 0.001 (0.46) Number of similar format FM stations in market -0.001 (1.23) -0.001 (1.32) -0.001 (1.14) Number of similar format non- commercial stations in market -0.000 (0.02) 0.000 (0.09) -0.000 (0.12) Number of commercial TV stations in market -0.001 (0.36) -0.002 (0.48) -0.001 (0.20) Digital radio stations in market 0.000 (0.45) 0.000 (0.24) 0.000 (0.74) Retail expenditures in market -0.000 (0.72) -0.000 (0.81) -0.000 (0.53) Population density of market 0.000 (0.16) 0.000
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-broadband-dead-zone-report.pdf
  • for this information system is designed, please skip to Question 1.21. 1.20 If not, why or for what reasons is the information being collected? 1.21 Is the information covered under a Security Classification as determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.22 What are categories of individuals covered by the system of records notice (SORN)? 1.23 What are the categories of records, e.g., types of information (or records) that the system of records notice (SORN) collects, maintains, and uses? 1.24 What is the legal authority that authorizes the development of the information system and the information/data collection? 1.25 What are the purposes for collecting, maintaining, and using the information covered by the system of records notice
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-ccd.pdf
  • government classified information included in the information that is collected by the two PSHSB Customer Comment Cards. 1.22 What is the legal authority that authorizes the development of the information system and the information/data collection? Sections 151, 152, 155, 257, 303 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 151.152, 155, 257; and 5 U.S.C. 602(c) and 609(a)(3). 1.23 In what instances would the information system's administrator/manager/developer permit disclosure to those groups outside the FCC for whom the information was not initially intended. Such disclosures, which are referred to as "Routine Uses," are those instances that permit the FCC to disclose information from a SORN to specific "third parties." These disclosures may be for the following reasons: (check all
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-core-financial.pdf
  • What is the legal authority that authorizes the development of the information system and the information/data collection? 31 U.S.C. 3302(e); 44 U.S.C. 3101, 3102, and 3309; Debt Collection Act as amended by the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996; Federal Financial Management Improvement Act of 1996; Chief Financial Officers Act of 1990; and Federal Managers Financial Integrity Act of 1982 1.23 In what instances would the information system's administrator/manager/developer permit disclosure to those groups outside the FCC for whom the information was not initially intended. Such disclosures, which are referred to as "Routine Uses," are those instances that permit the FCC to disclose information from a SORN to specific "third parties." These disclosures may be for the following reasons: (check all
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-criminal-investigative-files.pdf
  • designed, please skip to Question 1.21. 1.20 If not, why or for what reasons is the information being collected? 12 1.21 Is the information covered under a Security Classification as determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.22 What is the legal authority that authorizes the development of the information system and the information/data collection? 1.23 In what instances would the information system's administrator/manager/developer permit disclosure to those groups outside the FCC for whom the information was not initially intended. Such disclosures, which are referred to as "Routine Uses," are those instances that permit the FCC to disclose information from a SORN to specific "third parties." These disclosures may be for the following reasons: (check all
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-crisis.pdf
  • If yes, please skip to Question 1.21. 1.20 If not, why or for what reasons is the information being collected? 1.21 Is the information covered under a Security Classification as determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.22 What is the legal authority that authorizes the development of the information system and the information/data collection? 1.23 In what instances would the information system's administrator/manager/developer permit disclosure to those groups outside the FCC for whom the information was not initially intended. Such disclosures, which are referred to as "Routine Uses," are those instances that permit the FCC to disclose information from a SORN to specific "third parties." These disclosures may be for the following reasons: (check all
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-dqc.pdf
  • is designed, please skip to Question 1.21. 1.20 If not, why or for what reasons is the information being collected? 1.21 Is the information covered under a Security Classification as determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.22 What is the legal authority that authorizes the development of the information system and the information/data collection? 1.23 In what instances would the information system's administrator/manager/developer permit disclosure to those groups outside the FCC for whom the information was not initially intended. Such disclosures, which are referred to as "Routine Uses," 2 are those instances that permit the FCC to disclose information from a SORN to specific "third parties." These disclosures may be for the following reasons: (check
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-ecfs.pdf
  • is designed, please skip to Question 1.21. 1.20 If not, why or for what reasons is the information being collected? 1.21 Is the information covered under a Security Classification as determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.22 What is the legal authority that authorizes the development of the information system and the information/data collection? 1.23 In what instances would the information system's administrator/manager/developer permit disclosure to those groups outside the FCC for whom the information was not initially intended. Such disclosures, which are referred to as "Routine Uses," 2 are those instances that permit the FCC to disclose information from a SORN to specific "third parties." These disclosures may be for the following reasons: (check
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-email.pdf
  • designed, please skip to Question 1.21. 1.20 If not, why or for what reasons is the information being collected? 1.21 Is the information covered under a Security Classification as determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: 12 1.22 What is the legal authority that authorizes the development of the information system and the information/data collection? 1.23 In what instances would the information system's administrator/manager/developer permit disclosure to those groups outside the FCC for whom the information was not initially intended. Such disclosures, which are referred to as "Routine Uses," 2 are those instances that permit the FCC to disclose information from a SORN to specific "third parties." These disclosures may be for the following reasons: (check
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-experimental-radio.pdf
  • designed, please skip to Question 1.21. 1.20 If not, why or for what reasons is the information being collected? 1.21 Is the information covered under a Security Classification as determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: 12 1.22 What is the legal authority that authorizes the development of the information system and the information/data collection? 1.23 In what instances would the information system's administrator/manager/developer permit disclosure to those groups outside the FCC for whom the information was not initially intended. Such disclosures, which are referred to as "Routine Uses," 2 are those instances that permit the FCC to disclose information from a SORN to specific "third parties." These disclosures may be for the following reasons: (check
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-faca.pdf
  • is designed, please skip to Question 1.21. 1.20 If not, why or for what reasons is the information being collected? 1.21 Is the information covered under a Security Classification as determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.22 What is the legal authority that authorizes the development of the information system and the information/data collection? 1.23 In what instances would the information system's administrator/manager/developer permit disclosure to those groups outside the FCC for whom the information was not initially intended. Such disclosures, which are referred to as "Routine Uses," 2 are those instances that permit the FCC to disclose information from a SORN to specific "third parties." These disclosures may be for the following reasons: (check
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-financial.pdf
  • U.S.C. 3302(e); 44 U.S.C. 3101, 3102, and 3309; the Debt Collection Act as amended by the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996; Section 639 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2005 (P.L. 108-447) 31 U.S.C. 3302(e); Federal Financial Management Improvement Act of 1996; Chief Financial Officers Act of 1990; Federal Managers Financial Integrity Act of 1982; and Executive Order 9397. 1.23 In what instances would the information system's administrator/manager/developer permit disclosure to those groups outside the FCC for whom the information was not initially intended. Such disclosures, which are referred to as "Routine Uses," are those instances that permit the FCC to disclose information from a SORN to specific "third parties." These disclosures may be for the following reasons: (check all
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-foia.pdf
  • yes, please skip to Question 1.21. 1.20 If not, why or for what reasons is the information being collected? 1.21 Is the information covered under a Security Classification as determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: 11 1.22 What is the legal authority that authorizes the development of the information system and the information/data collection? 1.23 In what instances would the information system's administrator/manager/developer permit disclosure to those groups outside the FCC for whom the information was not initially intended. Such disclosures, which are referred to as "Routine Uses," are those instances that permit the FCC to disclose information from a SORN to specific "third parties." These disclosures may be for the following reasons: (check all
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-general-investigative-files.pdf
  • designed, please skip to Question 1.21. 1.20 If not, why or for what reasons is the information being collected? 1.21 Is the information covered under a Security Classification as determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: 12 1.22 What is the legal authority that authorizes the development of the information system and the information/data collection? 1.23 In what instances would the information system's administrator/manager/developer permit disclosure to those groups outside the FCC for whom the information was not initially intended. Such disclosures, which are referred to as "Routine Uses,"2 are those instances that permit the FCC to disclose information from a SORN to specific "third parties." These disclosures may be for the following reasons: (check all
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-ils.pdf
  • is designed, please skip to Question 1.21. 1.20 If not, why or for what reasons is the information being collected? 1.21 Is the information covered under a Security Classification as determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.22 What is the legal authority that authorizes the development of the information system and the information/data collection? 1.23 In what instances would the information system's administrator/manager/developer permit disclosure to those groups outside the FCC for whom the information was not initially intended. Such disclosures, which are referred to as "Routine Uses," 2 are those instances that permit the FCC to disclose information from a SORN to specific "third parties." These disclosures may be for the following reasons: (check
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-investigations-hearings.pdf
  • is designed, please skip to Question 1.21. 1.20 If not, why or for what reasons is the information being collected? 1.21 Is the information covered under a Security Classification as determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.22 What is the legal authority that authorizes the development of the information system and the information/data collection? 1.23 In what instances would the information system's administrator/manager/developer permit disclosure to those groups outside the FCC for whom the information was not initially intended. Such disclosures, which are referred to as "Routine Uses," 2 are those instances that permit the FCC to disclose information from a SORN to specific "third parties." These disclosures may be for the following reasons: (check
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-labor-employee-relations.pdf
  • is designed, please skip to Question 1.21. 1.20 If not, why or for what reasons is the information being collected? 1.21 Is the information covered under a Security Classification as determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.22 What is the legal authority that authorizes the development of the information system and the information/data collection? 1.23 In what instances would the information system's administrator/manager/developer permit disclosure to those groups outside the FCC for whom the information was not initially intended. Such disclosures, which are referred to as "Routine Uses," 2 are those instances that permit the FCC to disclose information from a SORN to specific "third parties." These disclosures may be for the following reasons: (check
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-lmts.pdf
  • System (LMTS) and to the PII that it collects, uses, and maintains, which is covered by FCC/OLA-1, "Legislative Management Tracking System (LMTS)" SORN. 1.22 What are the categories of individuals covered by the system of records notice (SORN)? The categories of individuals include members of the U.S. House of Representatives and the Senate, members of the public-at-large, and FCC employees. 1.23 What are the categories of records, e.g., types of information (or records) that the system of records notice (SORN) collects, maintains, and uses? The categories of records in the Congressional correspondence and any attachments may include: (1) Members of the public at large: the individual's name, Social Security Number (SSN), birth date, home address, home telephone number(s), personal cell phone
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-pams.pdf
  • system, and to the personally identifiable information (PII) that it collects, uses, and maintains, that is covered by FCC/OMD- 26, "Personnel Availability Management System (PAMS)" SORN. 1.22 What are categories of individuals covered by the system of records notice (SORN)? The categories of individuals that are covered by FCC/OMD-26, "Personnel Availability Management System (PAMS)" SORN include FCC employees and contractors. 1.23 What are the categories of records, e.g., types of information (or records) that the system of records notice (SORN) collects, maintains, and uses? The categories of records that are covered by FCC/OMD-26, "Personnel Availability Management System (PAMS)" SORN include the following: (1) FCC employees--name, home address, home telephone number(s), personal cell phone number(s), pager/PIN, and personal e-mail address(es); and (2)
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-pay-leave-garnish.pdf
  • designed, please skip to Question 1.21. 1.20 If not, why or for what reasons is the information being collected? 1.21 Is the information covered under a Security Classification as determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: 12 1.22 What is the legal authority that authorizes the development of the information system and the information/data collection? 1.23 In what instances would the information system's administrator/manager/developer permit disclosure to those groups outside the FCC for whom the information was not initially intended. Such disclosures, which are referred to as "Routine Uses," 2 are those instances that permit the FCC to disclose information from a SORN to specific "third parties." These disclosures may be for the following reasons: (check
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-personal-security-files.pdf
  • designed, please skip to Question 1.21. 1.20 If not, why or for what reasons is the information being collected? 12 1.21 Is the information covered under a Security Classification as determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.22 What is the legal authority that authorizes the development of the information system and the information/data collection? 1.23 In what instances would the information system's administrator/manager/developer permit disclosure to those groups outside the FCC for whom the information was not initially intended. Such disclosures, which are referred to as "Routine Uses,"2 are those instances that permit the FCC to disclose information from a SORN to specific "third parties." These disclosures may be for the following reasons: (check all
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-physical-access.pdf
  • is designed, please skip to Question 1.21. 1.20 If not, why or for what reasons is the information being collected? 1.21 Is the information covered under a Security Classification as determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.22 What is the legal authority that authorizes the development of the information system and the information/data collection? 1.23 In what instances would the information system's administrator/manager/developer permit disclosure to those groups outside the FCC for whom the information was not initially intended. Such disclosures, which are referred to as "Routine Uses," are those instances that permit the FCC to disclose information from a SORN to specific "third parties." These disclosures may be for the following reasons: (check all
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-reasonable-accommodation-requests.pdf
  • is designed, please skip to Question 1.21. 1.20 If not, why or for what reasons is the information being collected? 1.21 Is the information covered under a Security Classification as determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.22 What is the legal authority that authorizes the development of the information system and the information/data collection? 1.23 In what instances would the information system's administrator/manager/developer permit disclosure to those groups outside the FCC for whom the information was not initially intended. Such disclosures, which are referred to as "Routine Uses," 2 are those instances that permit the FCC to disclose information from a SORN to specific "third parties." These disclosures may be for the following reasons: (check
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-remedy.pdf
  • is designed, please skip to Question 1.21. 1.20 If not, why or for what reasons is the information being collected? 1.21 Is the information covered under a Security Classification as determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.22 What is the legal authority that authorizes the development of the information system and the information/data collection? 1.23 In what instances would the information system's administrator/manager/developer permit disclosure to those groups outside the FCC for whom the information was not initially intended. 11 Such disclosures, which are referred to as "Routine Uses,"2 are those instances that permit the FCC to disclose information from a SORN to specific "third parties." These disclosures may be for the following reasons: (check
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-rmis.pdf
  • response: The Security Operations Center has determined that the new RMIS information system does not require a security classification. 1.22 What is the legal authority that authorizes the development of the information system and the information/data collection? Budget and Accounting Act of 1921; Budget and Accounting Procedures Act of 1950; Federal Communications Authorization Act of 1989, and 31 U.S.C. 525. 1.23 In what instances would the information system's administrator/manager/developer permit disclosure to those groups outside the FCC for whom the information was not initially intended. Such disclosures, which are referred to as "Routine Uses," are those instances that permit the FCC to disclose information from a SORN to specific "third parties." These disclosures may be for the following reasons: (check all
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-small-business-contacts.pdf
  • is designed, please skip to Question 1.21. 1.20 If not, why or for what reasons is the information being collected? 1.21 Is the information covered under a Security Classification as determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.22 What is the legal authority that authorizes the development of the information system and the information/data collection? 1.23 In what instances would the information system's administrator/manager/developer permit disclosure to those groups outside the FCC for whom the information was not initially intended. Such disclosures, which are referred to as "Routine Uses," 2 are those instances that permit the FCC to disclose information from a SORN to specific "third parties." These disclosures may be for the following reasons: (check
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-telephone-call-details.pdf
  • to Question 1.21. 1.20 If not, why or for what reasons is the information being collected? 1.21 Is the information covered under a Security Classification as determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.22 What is the location of the information covered by the system of records notice (SORN)? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.23 What are the categories of individuals covered by the system of records notice (SORN)? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.24 What are the categories of records, e.g., types of information (or records) that the system of records notice (SORN) collects, maintains, and uses? Yes No Please explain your response: 13 1.25 What is the legal authority under which the
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-transit.pdf
  • If yes, please skip to Question 1.21. 1.20 If not, why or for what reasons is the information being collected? 1.21 Is the information covered under a Security Classification as determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.22 What is the legal authority that authorizes the development of the information system and the information/data collection? 1.23 In what instances would the information system's administrator/manager/developer permit disclosure to those groups outside the FCC for whom the information was not initially intended. Such disclosures, which are referred to as "Routine Uses," are those instances that permit the FCC to disclose information from a SORN to specific "third parties." These disclosures may be for the following reasons: (check all
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-uls.pdf
  • designed, please skip to Question 1.21. 1.20 If not, why or for what reasons is the information being collected? 13 1.21 Is the information covered under a Security Classification as determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.22 What is the legal authority that authorizes the development of the information system and the information/data collection? 1.23 In what instances would the information system's administrator/manager/developer permit disclosure to those groups outside the FCC for whom the information was not initially intended. Such disclosures, which are referred to as "Routine Uses," are those instances that permit the FCC to disclose information from a SORN to specific "third parties." These disclosures may be for the following reasons: (check all
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-violators.pdf
  • Question 1.21. 1.20 If not, why or for what reasons is the information being collected? 1.21 Is the information covered under a Security Classification as determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.22 What is the location of the information covered by the system of records notice (SORN)? Yes No Please explain your response: 12 1.23 What are the categories of individuals covered by the system of records notice (SORN)? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.24 What are the categories of records, e.g., types of information (or records) that the system of records notice (SORN) collects, maintains, and uses? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.25 What is the legal authority under which the FCC
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pshsb-coop-plan.pdf
  • is designed, please skip to Question 1.21. 1.20 If not, why or for what reasons is the information being collected? 1.21 Is the information covered under a Security Classification as determined by the FCC Security Officer? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.22 What is the legal authority that authorizes the development of the information system and the information/data collection? 1.23 In what instances would the information system's administrator/manager/developer permit disclosure to those groups outside the FCC for whom the information was not initially intended. Such disclosures, which are referred to as "Routine Uses,"2 are those instances that permit the FCC to disclose information from a SORN to specific "third parties." These disclosures may be for the following reasons: (check all
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/materials/already-released/consumer090002.pdf
  • 18844 1 824 Notes: Log scales for population on the horizontal axis and the number of outlets in each medium on the vertical axis. See text for explanation. 46 Table 1: Television Outlets, 1994-2000 year N uhf vhf uhf+vhf network indep. public net+ind+pub 1994207 2.29 2.63 2.46 1995207 2.96 2.29 5.25 2.72 2.52 1.71 6.96 1996207 3.09 2.34 5.43 4.20 1.23 1.71 7.14 1997207 3.19 2.35 5.54 4.29 1.25 1.71 7.25 1998207 3.37 2.37 5.74 4.74 1.40 1.72 7.87 1999207 3.54 2.37 5.91 4.94 1.46 2000207 3.65 2.39 6.04 5.02 1.57 1.73 8.32 linked sample year N uhf vhf uhf+vhf network indep. public net+ind+pub 1994 2.64 2.88 3.33 1995143 3.76 2.63 6.38 3.01 3.37 2.04 8.42 1996143 3.88 2.68 6.56 4.85
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/comcast_separationagreement.pdf
  • AT&T Broadband Group and involving LMC or any of its Subsidiaries or the ownership of any securities of any such entity; (NY) 05726/135/SPIN-OFF/bid.sda.wpd 12/19/01 1:51pm 10 (g) (i) any Liabilities relating to, arising out of, or resulting from any Actions primarily related to, arising out of or resulting from the AT&T Broadband Business, including those listed or described on Schedule 1.23(g), (ii) 50% of the excess of any Liability related to, arising out of or resulting from any Specified Matter (including any legal or other fees incurred as a result of, or with respect to, any Specified Matter) over any amount AT&T receives from AWS in respect thereof, (iii) 50% of any Liability related to, arising out of or resulting from
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/comsat-telenor/fcc01-369.pdf
  • referred to and accessible subject to procedures specified in 18 U.S.C. § 2703(c) or (d) or 18 U.S.C. § 2709. Such information shall also be considered Subscriber Information when it is sought pursuant to the provisions of other Lawful U.S. Process. 1.22 "Telenor" has the meaning given to it in the Preamble. It includes all successors and assigns of Telenor. 1.23 "Telenor Broadband Services AS" or "TBS" has the meaning given to it in the Preamble, and also encompasses its directly or indirectly wholly-owned Norway-incorporated subsidiaries, Telenor Satellite Mobile Ventures AS and Telenor Satellite Mobile AS, including all of their successors, assigns and subsidiaries. 1.24 "Telenor USA" has the meaning given to it in the Preamble. It includes all successors, assigns