FCC Web Documents citing 1.276

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-224A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-224A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-224A1.txt
  • with particularity the issues it disputes. The Commission will issue a Hearing Designation Order setting the disputed issues for resolution in an evidentiary hearing before an Administrative Law Judge. Parties also retain the right to file an Application for Review pursuant to Rule 1.115. The Initial Decision of the ALJ is subject to further review as provided for in Section 1.276 of the Commission's rules. Parties are cautioned that breach of the good faith requirements imposed on all parties by the 800 MHz Report & Order may subject them to involuntary modification of their license, relegation to secondary status, monetary forfeiture and other enforcement action including, but not limited to, loss of license. . If you have questions after consulting these
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1855A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1855A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1855A1.txt
  • failed to specify whether parties are entitled to file exceptions to the ALJ's recommended decision. We issue this order, sua sponte, to remove uncertainty surrounding this issue and clarify that parties are entitled to file exceptions to the ALJ's recommended decision. We direct parties that choose to file exceptions to comply with the procedures and deadlines set forth in Sections 1.276 and 1.277 of the Commission's rules. As applied here, these rules allow parties to file exceptions to or briefs in support of the ALJ's recommended decision within 30 days after public release of the full text of the recommended decision. These rules also provide that parties may file reply briefs within ten days after the time for filing exceptions has
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1918A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1918A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1918A1.txt
  • (1999) (``[T]he Commission can refer discrete issues arising out of a proceeding for an adjudicatory hearing before an ALJ. . . . [T]he Commission is not limited to referring only entire proceedings for an adjudicatory hearing before an ALJ.''). Program Carriage Second Report and Order, 9 FCC Rcd at 2656, � 34. Id. at 2652, � 24; 47 C.F.R. � 1.276. Program Carriage Second Report and Order, 9 FCC Rcd at 2653, � 26. Id. The Tennis Channel, Inc. v. Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, Program Carriage Complaint (filed Jan. 5, 2010), at 4 (``Complaint''). The Tennis Channel is a video programming vendor as defined in Section 76.1300(e) of the Commission's Rules. See 47 C.F.R. � 76.1300(e). Complaint at 4. Pursuant to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1658A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1658A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1658A1.txt
  • 1.298 of this chapter. Procedures pertaining to appeals from rulings of the presiding officer are set forth in �� 1.301 and 1.302. Procedures pertaining to reconsideration and review of actions taken pursuant to delegated authority are set forth in �� 1.101, 1.102, 1.104, 1.106, 1.113, 1.115, and 1.117. Procedures pertaining to exceptions to initial decisions are set forth in �� 1.276 through 1.279. * * * * * Amend � 0.211 by revising paragraph (e) to read as follows: � 0.211 Chairman. * * * * * (e) Authority to act as ``Head of the Agency'' or ``Agency Head'' for administrative determinations required by the Federal Acquisition Regulation and Federal Management Circulars. * * * * * Amend � 0.231 by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-703A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-703A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-703A1.txt
  • Compliance with Initial Decision at 6-9; Conditional Petition for Stay at 5-7; see Initial Decision, supra note 1, at n.361 (``This Initial Decision shall become effective and this proceeding shall be terminated 50 days after release if exceptions are not filed within 30 days thereafter, unless the Commission elects to review the case of its own motion. 47 C.F.R. � 1.276(b).''). To the extent it is necessary to do so, we also waive 47 C.F.R. � 76.1302(j)(1), which provides that Initial Decisions mandating program carriage become effective upon release unless compliance would require the deletion of programming; see id. � 1.3 (Commission may waive any rule on its own motion for good cause). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-739A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-739A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-739A1.txt
  • 47 C.F.R. � 0.341(f). While this rule does not apply to this complaint (see supra n.7), we encourage the ALJ to make all reasonable efforts to comply with this deadline. Pursuant to Section 76.10(c)(2) of the Commission's Rules, a party aggrieved by the ALJ's decision on the merits may appeal such decision directly to the Commission in accordance with Sections 1.276(a) and 1.277(a) through (c) of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. � 76.10(c)(2). See supra � 37. In the 2011 Program Carriage Order, the Commission adopted a specific deadline for filing written appearances in a program carriage complaint proceeding referred to an ALJ for an initial decision. See 2011 Program Carriage Order, 26 FCC Rcd at 11510-11, � 22; see also
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-227263A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-227263A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-227263A1.txt
  • consideration the conclusions made in the Order along with any additional evidence developed at the hearing. The item identifies specific issues to be addressed at hearing, and directs that Applicants will have the burden of proof both with respect to the introduction of any new evidence they may proffer and with respect to all of the issues. Pursuant to Section 1.276 of the Commission's rules, any party that disagrees with the ALJ's recommendation will have the opportunity to appeal it to the Commission, which will review the matter de novo. The item directs the ALJ, based on the guidance and findings made in the item, along with any additional evidence developed at the hearing, to determine whether the transfer of control
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243429A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243429A1.txt
  • beam is a shaped beam 4) For elliptical beams: Not Applicable - the beam is a shaped beam 1 5) For beams of other than circular or elliptical shape: Co-polar and cross-polar gain contours are provided in electronic format: Co-polar gain contours: BSS-2 1 ACPOL.gxt Cross-polar gain contours: BSS-2 1AXPOL.gxt Beam aim point longitude: 87.672"W Beam aim point latitude: 3 1.276"N C.2.a Assinned frequencies Channels 1 - 32. Assigned frequencies correspond to center frequencies as described in Table 4 of Article 10 of Appendix 30. C.4 Class of station: EV Nature of service: CR Class of stationh) and nature of service C.6 Polarization Type of polarization: Circular Sense of polarization: Odd-numbered channels: LHCP Even-numbered channels: RHCP C.7.a Class of emission and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-244676A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-244676A1.txt
  • beam is a shaped beam 4) For elliptical beams: Not Applicable - the beam is a shaped beam 1 5) For beams of other than circular or elliptical shape: Co-polar and cross-polar gain contours are provided in electronic format: Co-polar gain contours: BSS-2 1 ACPOL.gxt Cross-polar gain contours: BSS-2 1AXPOL.gxt Beam aim point longitude: 87.672"W Beam aim point latitude: 3 1.276"N C.2.a Assinned frequencies Channels 1 - 32. Assigned frequencies correspond to center frequencies as described in Table 4 of Article 10 of Appendix 30. C.4 Class of station: EV Nature of service: CR Class of stationh) and nature of service C.6 Polarization Type of polarization: Circular Sense of polarization: Odd-numbered channels: LHCP Even-numbered channels: RHCP C.7.a Class of emission and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266054A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266054A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266054A1.txt
  • 23, 2006 Notice Chief Administrative Law Judge Richard L. Sippel's Initial Decision (FCC 06D-01) in MB Docket No. 04-191 was released on April 7, 2006. No exceptions have been filed, and the Commission has not ordered a review of the Initial Decision on its own motion. Fifty days have passed since public release of the Initial Decision. Pursuant to Section 1.276(e) of the Commission's Rules, the Initial Decision became effective May 30, 2006 without action by the Commission. FCC PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202 / 418-2830 TTY 202 / 418-2555 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov $ �����PNG > �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� �� �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-341A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-341A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-341A1.txt
  • Fox River Broadcasting, Inc. , 88 FCC 2d 1132, 1136 n.9 (Rev. Bd. 1982). Citizens for Jazz on WRVR, Inc. v. FCC, 775 F.2d 392, 395 n.1 (D.C. Cir. 1985), cited by Kay, does not hold to the contrary. 12. Second, Kay argues that the Bureau's exceptions and brief should be stricken as violating the provisions of 47 C.F.R. �� 1.276 and 1.277. According to Kay, the Bureau's pleading lacks a separate statement of the questions of law presented as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.276(a)(2). Moreover, Kay submits that the pleading exceeds the limit of 30 pages because, in addition to 29 pages of text, the pleading has seven pages of attachments. 47 C.F.R. � 1.277(c). The Bureau's pleading does
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01D-01A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01D-01A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01D-01A1.txt
  • of RBI or to the detriment of RBI's other stockholders. (RBI Exh. 46 at 8.) In the event exceptions are not filed within 30 days after the release of this Initial Decision and the Commission does not review the decision on its own motion, this Initial Decision will become effective 50 days after its public release pursuant to 47 C.F.R. �1.276 (d). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 01D-01 Federal Communications Commission FCC 01D-01 � � � � � � �� �� �� �� ��� �� f h � � � � � � � � � �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �0� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� M N M N �� N �� ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01D-2A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01D-2A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01D-2A1.txt
  • assignment as a defense to revocation and therefore to that extent it is addressed in this Summary Decision. This Summary Decision will become effective and this proceeding terminated 50 days after its public release if exceptions are not filed within 30 days after its release and if the Commission does not review this ruling on its own motion. 47 C.F.R. �1.276 (d). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 01D-02 Federal Communications Commission FCC 01D-02 � � " � " @& @& �� �� � �V �V
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-275A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-275A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-275A1.txt
  • on knowledge properly acquired in this proceeding. The essence of Family's claim, moreover, is that the remarks demonstrate bias, because they purportedly reflect a view that is unsupported by the record or is otherwise erroneous. If the ALJ's allegedly erroneous views result in rulings on the merits that are adverse to Family, however, it may, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.276 of the Commission's rules, appeal such rulings upon release of the Initial Decision, and any errors of fact or law may be corrected through the normal appellate process. We are not persuaded that the remaining matters challenged by Family manifest ``a deep-seated favoritism or antagonism that would make fair judgment impossible.'' Liteky, 510 U.S. at 555. Rather, they reflect a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02D-01A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02D-01A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02D-01A1.txt
  • amateur station control operator (second party) on behalf of another person (third party).'' (Official notice taken.) In the event exceptions are not filed within 30 days after the release of this Initial Decision, and the Commission does not review the case on its own motion, this Initial Decision shall become effective 50 days after its public release pursuant to Section 1.276(d) of the Rules. Federal Communications Commission FCC 02D-01 Federal Communications Commission FCC 02D-01 ���
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02D-02A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02D-02A1.txt
  • Operator License (File No. 00000-58498), ARE GRANTED.11 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Richard L. Sippel Chief Administrative Law Judge 11 This Initial Decision will become effective and this proceeding terminated 50 days after its public release if exceptions are not filed within 30 days after its release and if the Commission does not review this ruling on its own motion. 47 C.F.R. �1.276 (d).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03D-01A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03D-01A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03D-01A1.txt
  • As a result, the contingent return of the seven FM translator licenses provided for in the OSC is moot. This Initial Decision shall become effective and this proceeding shall be terminated 50 days after its release if exceptions are not filed within 30 days thereafter, unless the Commission elects to review the case on its own motion. 47 C.F.R. � 1.276(b). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 03D-01 Federal Communications Commission FCC 03D-01 T � ... � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �` � � � O O h�z O O h�z h�z h�+ h]a / gd h�+ h h h h�+ h h�+ h�+ h�+ h h hA h�+ hA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03D-02A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03D-02A1.txt
  • be revoked, and that their captioned applications must be denied. James A. Kay, Jr., 17 FCC Rcd at 1865; Marc Sobel, 17 FCC Rcd 1893-94.19 V. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, unless an appeal from this Initial Decision is taken by a party, or it is reviewed by the Commission on its own motion in accordance with Section 1.276 of the Rules, the licenses of Ronald Brasher for Private Land Mobile Stations WPLQ202, KCG967, WPLD495, WPKH771, WPKI739, WPKI733, WPKI707, WIL990, WPLQ475, WPLY658, WPKY903, WPKY901, WPLZ533, WPKI762, and WPDU262, Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas, ARE REVOKED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the licenses of Patricia Brasher for Private Land Mobile Stations WPJI362, WPKY900, and WPLD570, Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas, ARE REVOKED. IT IS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-128A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-128A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-128A1.txt
  • in this proceeding have not yet been revoked and the statutory language of amended section 312(g) does not apply. KSRM is correct that, at the time the new law was enacted, the effective date of the ALJ's revocation order in this proceeding had been automatically stayed pending the Commission's review of the exceptions in this proceeding. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.276 (filing of exceptions ``shall stay the effectiveness of the initial decision'' until Commission review completed); 5 U.S.C. 557(b) (ALJ's initial decision becomes decision of agency unless there is a timely appeal to the agency). The ALJ's order of revocation thus is not a final Commission decision. We note, however, that the scope of the new statutory provision in section 312(g)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05D-01A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05D-01A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05D-01A1.txt
  • only upon complete divestiture of Root stock to unrelated third parties. See 10 FCC Rcd at 6033. This Initial Decision on Remand shall become effective and this proceeding shall be terminated 50 days after its release if exceptions are not filed within 30 days thereafter, unless the Commission elects to review the case on its own motion. 47 C.F.R. � 1.276(b). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 05D-01 Federal Communications Commission FCC 05D-01 '' V Y r u � � h� h� h� h� h� h� h� @& @& ( ) 0 ( ) 0 �V �V �- �+ p4 �: ]a �p �q �z � � A � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06D-01A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06D-01A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06D-01A1.txt
  • at 17113, Appendix A, Section I. The rules provide for requests for installment payments. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1914. This Initial Decision shall become effective and this proceeding shall be terminated 50 days after its release if exceptions are not filed within 30 days thereafter, unless the Commission elects to review the case on its own motion. 47 C.F.R. � 1.276(b). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 06D-01 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06D-01 gd_ gd_ gd_ ]���gd_ gd_ '' h�~ h�~ hf hf hf hf hf hk hk gdX hX h� h h� h� 3 N � � � � � h� h� h� h� h� gd� h� h� h� gd� hf hf @& @& � � � - � � 0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07D-01A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07D-01A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07D-01A1.txt
  • Gulf Power's evidence did not contradict or rebut her opinion. (GP Exh. F passim.) Cf. Interlocutory Order FCC 05M-50, supra. This Initial Decision shall become effective and this proceeding shall be terminated 50 days after its release if exceptions are not filed within 30 days thereafter, unless the Commission elects to review the case on its own motion. 47 C.F.R. �1.276(b)/ (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 07D-01 Federal Communications Commission FCC 07D-01 h J K L o � � � � � � � � h� h� h� hVC hVC hVC hVC hVC hVC hVC 6 b � � �͇ � � ^� �\ \ ^�\ � ^� �\ \ ^�\ �\ \ ^�\ � ^� �\ \ ^�\ _ �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-102A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-102A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-102A1.txt
  • in processing construction permit applications to restore lost service in allowing assignment where the licensee was not declared bankrupt until after the Initial Decision). See also Oyate, Inc., 3 FCC Rcd 6759 � 27 (1988); Hertz Broadcasting of Birmingham, Inc., 57 FCC 2d 183, 184 � 5 (1976). See Opposition to Petition to Deny at 8. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.276(d) (providing that the timely filing of exceptions shall stay the effectiveness of the Initial Decision until the Commission's review thereof has been completed). In accordance with our practice, we do not vacate ALJ�s Summary Decision, Family Broadcasting, Inc., 16 FCC Rcd 15619 (ALJ 2002), aff'd in part, Family Broadcasting, Inc. (Memorandum Opinion and Order and Hearing Designation Order), 17 FCC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-201A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-201A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-201A1.txt
  • issued by the staff pursuant to delegated authority may file an application for review by the Commission in accordance with � 1.115 of this chapter. (2) Any party to a part 8 proceeding aggrieved by any decision on the merits by an administrative law judge may file an appeal of the decision directly with the Commission, in accordance with �� 1.276(a) and 1.277(a) through (c) of this chapter. APPENDIX C List of Commenters NPRM Comments orrow Leadership East Kentucky Leadership East Kentucky Leap Wireless International, Inc. and Cricket Communications, Inc. Leap Level 3 Communications LLC Level 3 Links Technology Solutions, Inc. Links Lisa Marie Hanlon, TelTech Communications LLC Lisa Marie Hanlon Maneesh Pangasa Maneesh Pangasa Mary-Anne Wolf Mary-Anne Wolf Matthew J.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-201A1_Rcd.pdf
  • issued by the staff pursuant to delegated authority may file an application for review by the Commission in accordance with � 1.115 of this chapter. (2) Any party to a part 8 proceeding aggrieved by any decision on the merits by an administrative law judge may file an appeal of the decision directly with the Commission, in accordance with �� 1.276(a) and 1.277(a) through (c) of this chapter. 18000 Federal Communications Commission FCC 10-201 APPENDIX C List of Commenters NPRM Comments501 Commenter Abbreviation 100 Black Men of America et al. (filed by Sylvia Aguilera) 100 Black Men of America et al. 2Wire, Inc. (filed by Jonathan Symonds) 2Wire 4Info, Inc. 4Info ACT 1 Group et al. (filed as World WideTechnology, Inc)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10D-01A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10D-01A1.txt
  • 3sexoffender.33 31.MovingbeyondhisunjustifiedLevel3reclassification,evidenceinthisrecordalso doesnotsupportaconclusionthatMr.TituslikelywouldusehisAmateurRadiotosolicit minorsforsex.(EBExhs.6,9-10.)Some,none,orfewminorHAMoperatorsmaybeinclose proximitytohisradiorepeaterfacility.(EBExh.6.)Thereis,however,noevidenceand thereforenoriskthatMr.TituswouldusehisHAMradiotosolicitminors.Thisconclusionis basedonexpertopinionevidenceofhisrehabilitation,apresentabsenceofsexualinterestin childrenandadolescents,andarecordofnon-recidivismforthepast18years. 32.Moreover,Mr.TitushasheldanAmateurRadiolicensefor20years,andthereisno credibleorreliableevidenceevensuggestingthatheeverhasusedoreverwoulddaretouse HAMradiocommunicationasameanstocontactminorsforillicitpurposes.And,itisofficially noticedthattheInternetisthechosentoolofpedophilesforreadilyreachingminorsand children.34Bycontrast,anAmateurRadiosolicitationwouldbehighlyriskyinviewofaculture amongHAMoperatorsofself-monitoringtrafficoverAmateurRadiofrequencies.Theriskto Mr.TitusofbeingmonitoredforanymisuseofAmateurRadioismanytimesgreaterthanthe Internet,particularlysincehehasregisteredasasexoffenderandcanbereadilyidentifiedand apprehendedifnecessary. CandorAssessment 33.Finally,theBureauassertsthatMr.Tituslackedcandorbecausehetestifiedthathe hadaninabilitytorecalldetailsofhissexualcrimesortreatment.(EBProposedFindingsof FactandConclusionofLaw at11-12.)Inordertoestablishalackofcandor,theBureauhasthe burdentoestablishbyapreponderanceofreliableevidencethatMr.Titusmisspokeandthatin 33 DetectiveShillingshouldhavetakenintoaccountMr.Titus'longhistoryasalawabidingcitizenbyexercising hisoptiontodepartfromthenumericalWASOSTscore.(EBExh.14at4.)DetectiveShilling,however,madeno suchdeparturedespitehistestimonythatsuchhistoryisan"importantaspect"ofriskassessment.(Tr.821.) 34 47C.F.R.�1.351(applyingFederalRulesofEvidencetoCommissionhearings);FED.R.EVID.201(a)-(b) (providingforjudicialnoticeofadjudicativefacts). 12 FederalCommunicationsCommission FCC lOD-Ol doingso,heintendedtodeceivethePresidingJudge.35Inthiscase,theBureaureliessolelyon speculativeinferencebasedonMr.Titus'inabilitytorecallderelictanddistastefulevents perpetratedmanyyearsago.Thereisnoreliableevidenceintherecordtosupportafindingthat Mr.Tituswasnottruthfulinhisinabilitytorecallthosedetailsofsuchlongpast,distasteful events.Mr.Titus'assertedmemorylossofdetailsthatmayhaveoccurredbefore199536isnot byitselfabasisforfindingalackofcandorinhistestimony. ORDER Fortheforegoingconsiderationsoftheevidenceandlegalauthoritiesshowingthatthe EnforcementBureaufailedtocarryitsburdenofproof,ITISHEREBYORDEREDthatthe AmateurRadioOperatorLicenseofAmateurRadioStationKB7ILDheldbyMr.DavidL.Titus SHALLNOTBEREVOKED. ITISFURTHERORDEREDthatthisLicenseRevocationProceedingEBDocketNo. 07-13,ISDISMISSEDonthemeritsandwithprejudice.37 FEDERALCOMMUNICATIONSCOMMISSION RichardL.Sippel ChiefAdministrativeLawJudge 35 SwanCreekCommc'ns,Inc.v.FCC,39F.3d1217(D.C.Cir.1994)(citingWeybumBroad.Ltd.P'shipv.FCC, 984F.2d1220,1232(D.C.Cir.1993)(intenttodeceive[is]anessentialelementofamisrepresentationorlackof candorshowing)). 36 TherepeaterlicensewasnotputinissuebytheBureauintheOSc.Therefore,therepeaterlicenseisnot revoked. 37 ThisInitialDecisionshallbecomeeffectiveandthisproceedingshallbeterminated50daysafteritsreleaseif exceptionsarenotfiledwithin30daysthereafter,unlesstheCommissionelectstoreviewthecaseonitsown motion.47C.F.R.�1.276(b). 13
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-119A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-119A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-119A1.txt
  • timetables for discovery, hearing and submission of briefs and proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law.''). A potential third step applies to the extent a party appeals the decision of the Media Bureau or an ALJ to the Commission. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.115, 76.10(c)(1) (pertaining to Applications for Review of actions taken on delegated authority); 47 C.F.R. �� 1.276, 76.10(c)(2) (pertaining to exceptions to initial decisions of an ALJ). We decline at this time to establish a deadline for Commission action on review of decisions by the Media Bureau or an ALJ. As amended herein, the program carriage rules provide for a 80-calendar-day initial pleading cycle (i.e., a 60-calendar-day period for filing an answer to a complaint and a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-44A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-44A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-44A1.txt
  • of the issues presented''). We have not considered the merits of any substantive arguments presented in Gulf Power's request for oral argument. These arguments, by supplementing Gulf Power's 23-page Exceptions, exceed the page limit prescribed by Section 1.277(c) and in any event are untimely because Gulf Power submitted them after the time period for filing Exceptions set forth in Section 1.276(a). See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.277(c) and 1.276(a). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 11-44 Federal Communications Commission FCC 11-44 U m n o � � � � � � � � � �@ � �@ � �@ � �@ � �@ � �@ � �@ � �@ � �@ � �@ � �@ � �@ � �@
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-50A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-50A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-50A1.txt
  • Cable Communications, LLC, Comcast's Conditional Petition for Stay (filed Jan. 25, 2012); see Initial Decision, supra note 1, at n.361 (``This Initial Decision shall become effective and this proceeding shall be terminated 50 days after release if exceptions are not filed within 30 days thereafter, unless the Commission elects to review the case of its own motion. 47 C.F.R. � 1.276(b).''). Comcast's Conditional Petition for Stay at 8. The Commission and courts traditionally examine (1) whether the movant is likely to succeed on the merits, (2) whether, in the absence of a stay, the movant would suffer irreparable injury, (3) whether grant of a stay would harm other interested parties, and (4) whether a stay would serve the public interest. See,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/FCC-05D-01A1.html
  • only upon complete divestiture of Root stock to unrelated third parties. See 10 FCC Rcd at 6033. This Initial Decision on Remand shall become effective and this proceeding shall be terminated 50 days after its release if exceptions are not filed within 30 days thereafter, unless the Commission elects to review the case on its own motion. 47 C.F.R. S 1.276(b). (Continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 05D-01 1 1 Federal Communications Commission FCC 05D-01 References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05D-01A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05D-01A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-b.pdf
  • Big Band/Nostalgia, Full Service, Classical, and various News and Talk formats. We classify as "young" listeners who are under 25. "Older" listeners are over 55. 46 Table 11: Direct Evidence of Preference Externalities by Race and Hispanic Status White Listening (1) Black Listening (2) Hispanic Listening (3) Non-Hispanic Listening (4) coef s.e. coef s.e. coef s.e. coef s.e. Constant 12.219 1.276 12.317 2.144 14.077 1.272 15.800 2.521 White Population 0.404 0.180 0.041 0.303 Black Population -0.593 0.880 2.723 1.478 Non-Hispanic Population 0.175 0.150 0.046 0.296 Hispanic Population 0.017 0.408 1.004 0.808 Northeast 1.491 0.721 1.299 1.212 1.249 0.595 0.074 1.179 North Central 1.020 0.735 -0.471 1.235 0.758 1.169 -0.267 2.317 South 0.168 0.718 0.670 1.206 -0.132 0.304 0.608 0.603 Percent Driving
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc020116.pdf
  • is used. V_tab 1 2 4 6 7 8 10 12 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 60 0.0000387 0.000154 0.00065 0.00175 0.00301 0.00454 0.0101 0.0188 0.0367 0.0751 0.124 0.187 0.263 0.350 0.442 0.536 0.707 0.0000352 0.000138 0.000591 0.00155 0.00265 0.00395 0.00887 0.0168 0.0335 0.0691 0.113 0.167 0.233 0.310 0.393 0.479 0.642 0.912 0.963 1.121 1.308 1.332 1.327 1.276 1.217 1.154 1.099 1.061 1.021 0.979 0.939 0.903 0.873 0.826 0.880 0.923 1.075 1.265 1.312 1.310 0.264 1.200 1.128 1.065 1.030 1.000 0.963 0.929 0.897 0.868 0.824 ������������������������������������������������ := [ freq kh kv ah av ] Step 5; Obtain the specific attenuation, gR, from the frequency dependent coefficients in ITU-R Rec. ITU-R P.838 and R0.01 as follows: Federal Communications Commission
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/1999/dd990910.html
  • and Radiotelephone Service Authorization. Action by Chief, Policy and Rules Branch, Commercial Wirless Division. Adopted: September 10, 1999. by Order. (DA No. 99-1835). WTB Internet URL: [10]http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/da991835.wp JAMES A. KAY, JR. Ordered that, unless an appeal from this Initial Decision is taken by a party, or it is reviewed by the Commission on its own motion in accordance with Section 1.276 of the Rules, the licenses of James A. Kay, Jr., holder of 152 Part 90 licenses in the Los Angeles, CA area, are not revoked. Dkt No.: 94-147. Action by Chief Administrative Law Judge Joseph Chachkin. Adopted: September 7, 1999. by Initial Decision. (FCC No. 99D-04). WTB Internet URL: [11]http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/fcc99d04.wp ADDENDA: The following items, released September 9, 1999, did not
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/FCC-05D-01A1.html
  • only upon complete divestiture of Root stock to unrelated third parties. See 10 FCC Rcd at 6033. This Initial Decision on Remand shall become effective and this proceeding shall be terminated 50 days after its release if exceptions are not filed within 30 days thereafter, unless the Commission elects to review the case on its own motion. 47 C.F.R. S 1.276(b). (Continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 05D-01 1 1 Federal Communications Commission FCC 05D-01 References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05D-01A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05D-01A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-10-102A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-10-102A1.pdf
  • in processing construction permit applications to restore lost service in allowing assignment where the licensee was not declared bankrupt until after the Initial Decision). See also Oyate, Inc., 3 FCC Rcd 6759 � 27 (1988); Hertz Broadcasting of Birmingham, Inc., 57 FCC 2d 183, 184 � 5 (1976). See Opposition to Petition to Deny at 8. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.276(d) (providing that the timely filing of exceptions shall stay the effectiveness of the Initial Decision until the Commission's review thereof has been completed). In accordance with our practice, we do not vacate ALJ�s Summary Decision, Family Broadcasting, Inc., 16 FCC Rcd 15619 (ALJ 2002), aff'd in part, Family Broadcasting, Inc. (Memorandum Opinion and Order and Hearing Designation Order), 17 FCC
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/engineering/76print.html
  • the merits issued by the staff pursuant to delegated authority may file an application for review by the Commission in accordance with 1.115 of this chapter. (2) Any party to a part 76 proceeding aggrieved by any decision on the merits by an administrative law judge may file an appeal of the decision directly with the Commission, in accordance with 1.276(a) and 1.277(a) through (c) of this chapter, except that in proceedings brought pursuant to 76.1003, 76.1302, and 76.1513 of this part, unless a stay is granted by the Commission, the decision by the administrative law judge will become effective upon release and will remain in effect pending appeal. [64 FR 6571, Feb. 10, 1999] [237][TOP] 76.11 Lockbox enforcement. Any party
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/engineering/part76.pdf
  • the merits issued by the staff pursuant to delegated authority may file an application for review by the Commission in accordance with �1.115 of this chapter. (2) Any party to a part 76 proceeding aggrieved by any decision on the merits by an administrative law judge may file an appeal of the decision directly with the Commission, in accordance with ��1.276(a) and 1.277(a) through (c) of this chapter, except that in proceedings brought pursuant to ��76.1003, 76.1302, and 76.1513 of this part, unless a stay is granted by the Commission, the decision by the administrative law judge will become effective upon release and will remain in effect pending appeal. [64 FR 6571, Feb. 10, 1999] � 76.11 Lockbox enforcement. top Any
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-b.pdf
  • Big Band/Nostalgia, Full Service, Classical, and various News and Talk formats. We classify as "young" listeners who are under 25. "Older" listeners are over 55. 46 Table 11: Direct Evidence of Preference Externalities by Race and Hispanic Status White Listening (1) Black Listening (2) Hispanic Listening (3) Non-Hispanic Listening (4) coef s.e. coef s.e. coef s.e. coef s.e. Constant 12.219 1.276 12.317 2.144 14.077 1.272 15.800 2.521 White Population 0.404 0.180 0.041 0.303 Black Population -0.593 0.880 2.723 1.478 Non-Hispanic Population 0.175 0.150 0.046 0.296 Hispanic Population 0.017 0.408 1.004 0.808 Northeast 1.491 0.721 1.299 1.212 1.249 0.595 0.074 1.179 North Central 1.020 0.735 -0.471 1.235 0.758 1.169 -0.267 2.317 South 0.168 0.718 0.670 1.206 -0.132 0.304 0.608 0.603 Percent Driving