FCC Web Documents citing 1.294
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-129A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-129A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-129A1.txt
- the subpoena under these circumstances. Our action herein denying the proposed settlement agreement is without regard to the allegedly improper statements contained in the responsive pleadings filed by Liberty and by BFBFM. The issue concerns replies that Liberty filed in response to oppositions to its November 10, 1999 amendment. These replies, according to Willsyr and Orion, are unauthorized under Section 1.294 of the rules. As the Enforcement Bureau notes, however, Section 73.3522(b), 47 C.F.R. § 73.3522(b), governing the filing of amendments to long-form applications, does not specifically authorize the filing of oppositions to such amendments. Furthermore, the Order, FCC 99I-23 ¶ 4 (OGC 1999), resuming the hearing proceeding in MM Docket No. 88-577contemplated only that motions to enlarge issues could be