FCC Web Documents citing 1.3

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fcc.gov/pshs/docs/speeches/Hinshaw%20-%20PSAP%20Brfg%20-%20FCC%20Trng%206-25-09.pdf
  • support, funding stream, legislation, national organizations (National Emergency Number Association) 9 1 1 In Disaster Operations �All 911 calls are routed to the nearest 911 Call Center (Public Safety Answer Point) �Accurate call back number (ANI) and location information (ALI) are provided to 911 call takers with all Wireline calls �During 2005 AT&T California processed: �15.4 Million 911 calls �Average 1.3 Million 911 calls per month 9 1 1 In Disaster Operations �911 Network �SS7 trunking, `Digital ALI'Network, CAMA Trunks, 911 Selective Routers, etc �911 Database �20 Million ALI records within the AT&T footprint �Fully redundant system and network configuration �Developed and maintained in partnership with County Coordinators, ILECs and CLECs �AT&T Ca. 911 Database accuracy exceeds 99.89%! 9 1 1
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1217A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1217A1.pdf
  • to a limited extension of the deadlines by which they were required to achieve 95% penetration among their subscribers of location-capable handsets. We therefore grant Petitioners' requests for further waiver, subject to the conditions and reporting requirements described herein. ordering clauses IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the ENHANCE 911 Act, Pub. L. No. 108-494, 118 Stat. 3986 (2004), and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the foregoing Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Request for Additional Limited Waiver and Extension of the Handset Penetration Deadline of the Commission's Phase II E911 Rules filed by South #5 RSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Brazos Cellular Communications, Ltd. IS GRANTED, nunc pro tunc, subject
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2150A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2150A1.pdf
  • � 19; NPTC Nov. 23, 2005 Letter. See Implementation of Section 703(e) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996; Amendment of the Commission's Rules and Policies Governing Pole Attachments, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 6777, 6788-89, � 19 (1998) (rejecting pole owners' proposal to impose a statute of limitations on pole attachment complaints) (subsequent history omitted). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (``Any provision of the rules may be waived by the Commission on its own motion or on petition if good cause therefor is shown.''). Reply at 19-20; Reply, Declaration of Loren Salsgiver, Chief Executive Officer of Salsgiver Telecom, at 2, �� 3, 4. See, e.g., Implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Amendment of Rules Governing Procedures to be Followed
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2682A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2682A1.pdf
  • is entitled to a limited extension of the deadline by which it was required to achieve 95% penetration among its subscribers of location-capable handsets. We therefore grant Five Star's Petition, subject to the conditions and reporting requirements described herein. ordering clauses IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the ENHANCE 911 Act, Pub. L. No. 108-494, 118 Stat. 3986 (2004), and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the foregoing Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Temporary Waiver or Temporary Stay by Texas RSA 15B2 Limited Partnership d/b/a Five Star Wireless IS GRANTED, subject to the conditions and reporting requirements specified herein. The deadline for compliance with Section 20.18(g)(1)(v) is December
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3719A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3719A1.pdf
  • its network; (3) the status of its coordination efforts with PSAPs for alternative 95% handset penetration dates; (4) its efforts to encourage customers to upgrade to location-capable handsets; and (5) the percentage of its customers with location-capable phones. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the ENHANCE 911 Act, Pub. L. No. 108-494, 118 Stat. 3986 (2004), and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the Request for Waiver of the 95% Location Capable Handset Penetration Requirement filed by Sagebrush Cellular, Inc. and Triangle Communication System, Inc. IS GRANTED, nunc pro tunc, subject to the reporting requirements specified herein. The deadline for compliance with Section 20.18(g)(1)(v) is June 28, 2007. IT IS FURTHER
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3957A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3957A1.pdf
  • and Order referenced above has yet to be released. Therefore, out of an abundance of caution, and to prevent any confusion, we hereby waive the sunshine period prohibition, to the extent necessary, to allow parties to file reply comments and make ex parte presentations relating to questions raised in Section III.B. 3. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, Section 1.1203 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1203, IS WAIVED to the extent described above. 4. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.191 and 0.392 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.191, 0.392. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Derek K. Poarch Chief Public Safety and Homeland Security
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4177A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4177A1.pdf
  • By the Chief, Public Safety & Homeland Security Bureau: On October 4, 2007, the Commission issued an Order on Reconsideration revising the emergency backup power rule set forth in Section 12.2 of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) and (j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. ��154(i) and (j), and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that the previously-adopted Section 12.2 in the Katrina Panel Order is suspended until publication in the Federal Register of the Order on Reconsideration in which the Commission adopted the amended Section 12.2. The effective date of this Order is the date upon which this Order is released by the Commission. This action
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-431A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-431A1.pdf
  • first responders. We thus are denying the requested waiver and dismissing the related applications without prejudice to Florida filing new applications for offset channels that comport with Section 90.621(b) of the Commission's rules. Ordering clause IT IS ORDERED pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 303(r), and Sections 0.392, 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.392, 1.3, 1.925, that the Requests for Waiver to Operate on 12.5 kHz Offset Channels filed by the State of Florida on March 1, 2005 and March 2, 2005, in association with FCC File Nos. 0002066133 and 0002063445, ARE DENIED, and the applications, FCC File Nos. 0002066133 and 0002063445 ARE DISMISSED.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4394A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4394A1.pdf
  • - and an explanation of why C&CC has chosen the compliance efforts it has chosen. We emphasize that irrespective of the relief we grant in this Order, we fully expect C&CC to achieve compliance as quickly as possible. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the ENHANCE 911 Act, Pub. L. No. 108-494, 118 Stat. 3986 (2004), and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the Petition for Extension of Waiver filed by Cable & Communications Corporation IS GRANTED IN PART, subject to the conditions and reporting requirements specified herein. The deadline for compliance with Section 20.18(g)(1)(v) is April 26, 2008. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.191 and
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4395A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4395A1.pdf
  • that the requested waiver be granted. This Order therefore grants Geemarc's waiver request. As a result, Geemarc may proceed with either TCB certification or Self-Declaration of Conformity pursuant to Part 68 of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.141 and 0.361 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the request for waiver of section 68.317(f) for Models Geemarc Ampli 200+, Geemarc Clearsound 200+, Geemarc CLEARVIEW 200+, and Geemarc 200+, filed by Geemarc Telecom International Ltd., IS GRANTED to the extent stated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: (1) the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4396A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4396A1.pdf
  • that the requested waiver be granted. This Order therefore grants Clarity's waiver request. As a result, Clarity may proceed with either TCB certification or Self-Declaration of Conformity pursuant to Part 68 of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.141 and 0.361 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the request for waiver of section 68.317(f) for Models C4220, C4230, and C4230HS, filed by Clarity, A Division of Plantronics, Inc., IS GRANTED to the extent stated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: (1) the volume reset override switch shall be
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5079A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5079A1.pdf
  • - and an explanation of why Leaco has chosen the compliance efforts it has chosen. We emphasize that irrespective of the relief we grant in this Order, we fully expect Leaco to achieve compliance as quickly as possible. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the ENHANCE 911 Act, Pub. L. No. 108-494, 118 Stat. 3986 (2004), and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the Petition for Extension of Waiver filed by Leaco Rural Telephone Cooperative, Inc. IS GRANTED, subject to the conditions and reporting requirements specified herein. The deadline for compliance with Section 20.18(g)(1)(v) is March 12, 2008. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.191 and 0.392
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-659A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-659A1.pdf
  • in part and extend the date by which SouthernLINC must achieve 95% penetration to November 12, 2007. We further impose the conditions and reporting requirements described herein to ensure that SouthernLINC achieves full compliance with the Commission's E911 requirements. ordering clauses IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the ENHANCE 911 Act, Pub. L. No. 108-494, 118 Stat. 3986 (2004), and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the foregoing Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Request for Additional Limited Waiver and Extension of the Handset Penetration Deadline of the Commission's Phase II E911 Rules by Southern Communications Services, Inc. d/b/a SouthernLINC Wireless IS GRANTED IN PART, subject to the conditions and reporting
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1094A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1094A1.pdf
  • the U.S./Canada border area and may operate according to the non-border band plan listed in � 90.617. TABLE C5 - CITIES THAT ARE CONSIDERED TO FALL OUTSIDE THE CANADA BORDER REGION Location Coordinates Latitude Longitude Akron, Ohio Youngstown, Ohio Syracuse, New York 41( 05' 00.2" N. 41( 05' 57.2" N. 43( 03' 04.2" N. 81( 30' 39.4" W. 80( 39' 01.3" W. 76( 09' 12.7" W. (6) The channels listed in Table C6 and paragraph (c)(6)(i) of this section are available in the Canada Border Regions for non-cellular operations to eligible applicants in the Public Safety Category which consists of licensees eligible in the Public Safety Pool of subpart B of this part. 800 MHz high density cellular systems as defined
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1449A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1449A1.pdf
  • 26, 2008). This will provide the Commission with time to consider the issues raised by the Sprint Petition. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority of Sections 0.191 and 0.392 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.191, 0.392; Sections 4(i) and (j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 C.F.R. �� 154(i) and (j), and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and Section 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.925, that the deadline by which Sprint must vacate the Mid-Band is waived for a period of 30 days. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Derek K. Poarch Chief, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau Petition for Relief - Expedited Action Requested, filed by Sprint
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1685A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1685A1.pdf
  • June 2, 2008, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau initiated an investigation into whether RangeVideo is marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices, specifically, wireless video transmitters. At the time of that letter, we observed on your website, www.rangevideo.com, your marketing of the following radio frequency devices: 900MHz 100mW audio/video transmitter 900MHz 500mW audio/video transmitter 1.3GHz 300mW audio/video transmitter 2.4GHz 200mW audio/video transmitter 2.4GHz 500mW audio/video transmitter 2.4GHz 1000mW audio/video transmitter 2.4GHz 1000mW cased audio/video transmitter. In your response to the LOI dated June 30, 2008, you state that you do not manufacture these transmitter devices. You admit that you first imported the devices on August 2, 2006, that you continue to import the devices, that
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1730A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1730A1.pdf
  • 14 FCC Rcd at 190-96 �� 77-89. See First Report and Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 193-94 � 84. The Commission directed RPCs to promptly adopt operating procedures that ``ensure that all entities will be given reasonable notice of all committee meetings and deliberations.'' Id. at 195 � 86. Id. .. 47 C.F.R. � 90.527. . See Revised Plan, Section 1.3 Plan Development and Regional Participation at 10-11. See Revised Plan Appendix A - Bylaws at 66-73 (adopted Aug. 14, 2006). See Revised Plan Appendix B - Original Region 20 Member List and Contact Information; see also, Plan Appendix B-1 Region 20 Membership at Time of Completion of the 700 MHz Plan. See Revised Plan, Section 2.1 - Notification Process at
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1748A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1748A1.pdf
  • additional 30 days to provide the Commission with additional time to consider the issues raised by the Sprint Petition. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority of Sections 0.191 and 0.392 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.191, 0.392, Sections 4(i) and (j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 C.F.R. �� 154(i) and (j), Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and Section 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.925, that the deadline by which Sprint must vacate the Mid-Band is waived for a period of 30 days until August 25, 2008. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Derek K. Poarch Chief, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau Petition for Relief - Expedited Action
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1963A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1963A1.pdf
  • additional 30 days to provide the Commission with additional time to consider the issues raised by the Sprint Petition. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority of Sections 0.191 and 0.392 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.191, 0.392, Sections 4(i) and (j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 C.F.R. �� 154(i) and (j), Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and Section 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.925, that the deadline by which Sprint must vacate the Mid-Band is waived for a period of 30 days until September 24, 2008. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Derek K. Poarch Chief, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau Petition for Relief - Expedited Action
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2139A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2139A1.pdf
  • additional 30 days to provide the Commission with additional time to consider the issues raised by the Sprint Petition. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority of Sections 0.191 and 0.392 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.191, 0.392, Sections 4(i) and (j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 C.F.R. �� 154(i) and (j), Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and Section 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.925, that the deadline by which Sprint must vacate the Mid-Band is waived for a period of 30 days until October 24, 2008. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Derek K. Poarch Chief, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau Petition for Relief - Expedited Action
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2351A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2351A1.pdf
  • additional 30 days to provide the Commission with additional time to consider the issues raised by the Sprint Petition. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority of Sections 0.191 and 0.392 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.191, 0.392, Sections 4(i) and (j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 C.F.R. �� 154(i) and (j), Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and Section 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.925, that the deadline by which Sprint must vacate the Mid-Band is waived for a period of 30 days until November 24, 2008. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Derek K. Poarch Chief, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau Petition for Relief - Expedited Action
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2648A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2648A1.pdf
  • the development of coordinated regional plans, and developed a Regional Planning Guidebook. Following the sunset of the NCC's charter on July 25, 2003, the National Public Safety Telecommunications Council (NPSTC) agreed to continue to provide assistance to regional planners. A copy of the 700 MHz Regional Planning Guidebook is available at the NPSTC website at http://www.npstc.org/documents.html. See Revised Plan, Section 1.3 Plan Development and Regional Participation at 10-11. See Revised Plan at Appendix C - Notices, Minutes, Membership Attendance Lists (the July 29, 2003 Meeting Minutes note that due to the lack of statewide notification, the RPC re-convened). See Revised Plan Appendix A - (Committee/Workgroup Membership), lists three committees: Core Committee (responsible for drafting the 700 MHz plan); Frequency Advisory Committee
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-303A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-303A1.pdf
  • period from 0.0072 to 0.00819 in order to collect the additional monies needed over the remaining months of the fund year. The revised Fund size shall be $636,736,491.75. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in Section 225 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 225, and Sections 0.141, 0.361 and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361 and 1.3, this Order IS hereby ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Interstate TRS Fund size for the July 2007 through June 2008 funding period will increase from $553,378,363.18 to $636,736,491.75 and that, as a result, the annual contribution factor shall be modified from 0.0072 to 0.00819. IT IS FURTHER
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-406A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-406A1.pdf
  • - and an explanation of why SouthernLINC has chosen the compliance efforts it has chosen. We emphasize that irrespective of the relief we grant in this Order, we fully expect SouthernLINC to achieve compliance as quickly as possible. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the ENHANCE 911 Act, Pub. L. No. 108-494, 118 Stat. 3986 (2004), and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the Request for Further Limited Waiver filed by Southern Communications Services, Inc. d/b/a SouthernLINC Wireless IS GRANTED IN PART, subject to the conditions and reporting requirements specified herein. The deadline for compliance with Section 20.18(g)(1)(v) is August 15, 2008. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-710A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-710A1.pdf
  • the Second Report and Order, the Commission found that a viewer's reasonable expectation regarding the availability of alerts over television programming is identical, whether the programming is over-the-air broadcasting, cable, DBS, or a new wireline video service. The Commission thus extended EAS requirements to wireline video service providers. In this limited waiver context, however, we find that, consistent with Section 1.3 and WAIT Radio, AT&T has demonstrated unique factual circumstances, i.e., that technical limitations of its system architecture, affecting both hardware and software equipment, prevent it from complying with the deadline in the Second Report and Order and that, absent an upgrade of its hardware and software facilities, it has no reasonable alternative by which to provide EAS on all of
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-802A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-802A1.pdf
  • 20.9, which specifies that Part 22 Paging and Radiotelephone Service operations be treated as commercial mobile radio services, and (ii) Section 22.565, which specifies the transmitting power limits associated with Part 22 Paging and Radiotelephone Service operations. Wyoming seeks waiver relief pursuant to Section 337(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 337(c), or, alternatively, Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925. Wyoming states that it expects WyoLink to be used by participating local, state, and federal agencies to support critical public safety activities serving Wyoming's population of over 500,000 residents and its more than 11 million annual visitors and tourists. Although Wyoming estimates that the requested Part 22 channels represent
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-821A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-821A1.pdf
  • 64.604(a)(4), must implement a manual system for doing so, to the extent feasible, that accomplishes the proper routing of emergency 711-dialed calls as efficiently as possible. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 1, 2, and 225 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 152, and 225, and Sections 0.141, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.316 & 1.3, this Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that interconnected VoIP providers ARE GRANTED a waiver, until March 31, 2009, of the requirement to route 711-dialed calls to an appropriate relay center, but only in the context of 711-dialed calls in which the calling party is using a non-geographically
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1095A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1095A1.pdf
  • 80.215. Section 80.205 addresses bandwidths, with an accompanying table that ``gives the class of emission and corresponding emission designator and authorized bandwidth.'' See 47 C.F.R. � 80.205. Section 80.211 addresses emission limitations. See 47 C.F.R. � 80.211. Section 80.215 addresses transmitter power limitations. See 47 C.F.R. � 80.215. See Waiver Clarification. See 47 C.F.R. �� 80.205, 80.211, 80.215. Under Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, we may consider on our own motion whether to waive those rules for which Granite has not requested relief, for good cause shown. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See In the Matter of Maritel, Inc. and Mobex Network Services, LLC, WT Docket No. 04-257, Report and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 8971-72 � 1 (2007) (Coast Station
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1319A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1319A1.pdf
  • Part 4 information is similar in many ways to the information that we collect in DIRS, we do not believe such communications providers should be required to provide Part 4 information, and that it is sufficient for them to submit reports in DIRS that provide the status of their communications infrastructure in the area defined by the DIRS activation. Section 1.3 of our rules authorizes the Commission to waive a Commission rule for good cause shown. If the two waiver conditions described above are met (i.e. the outage occurs in the DIRS-defined geographic area and the communications provider suffering the outage submits new or updated DIRS reports at least every 24 hours), the Commission will be apprised of the status of
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2088A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2088A1.pdf
  • provide assistance to regional planners. A copy of the 700 MHz Regional Planning Guidebook is available at the NPSTC website at http://www.npstc.org/nccsubcom.jsp. See Plan, Section 1.7 - Notification Process at 12. Id. Meeting notifications were published by FCC public notice, and by placement in the Association of Public Safety Communications Officials, Inc. MRT and Radio Resource magazines. See Plan, Section 1.3 - Authority and Administrative Bylaws 2-6. See Plan, Appendix B - Membership List at B1-B2. See Plan, Appendix A - Initial Meeting Notice, Minutes and Letter of Assignment; see also Plan, Appendix C - List of Meetings Held at C1; Plan, Appendix D - Meeting Minutes and Announcements at D1-D74. See Plan, Section 3 - Allocation of General Use Spectrum
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2506A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2506A1.pdf
  • of any of the video transmitters, and that the devices are imported from import/export companies in China and Hong Kong. You indicate that you imported the specified devices between December 19, 2007 and June 8, 2008, and imported a total of 124 units. Additionally, you indicate that the frequency bands on which the 1.2 GHz transmitters operate are 0.9 GHz/1.2 GHz/1.3 GHz and that the frequency bands on which the 2.4 GHz transmitters operate are 2.2 GHz/2.3 GHz/2.4 GHz. Your response also states that ``[you] have immediately ceased all sales of the products in question. The website has been dismantled and the domain name will be relinquished.'' You admit that the devices have not been certified in accordance with the Rules,
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-442A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-442A1.pdf
  • in Table C5 may operate according to the band plan for Canadian Border Regions 7A and 7B as indicated below. TABLE C5 - CITIES THAT ARE CONSIDERED TO FALL WITHIN CANDIAN BORDER REGION 7 Location Coordinates Canadian Border Region Latitude Longitude Akron, Ohio 41( 05' 00.2" N. 81( 30' 39.4" W. 7A Youngstown, Ohio 41( 05' 57.2" N. 80( 39' 01.3" W. 7A Syracuse, New York 43( 03' 04.2" N. 76( 09' 12.7" W. 7B * * * * (7) * * * TABLE C7 - GENERAL CATEGORY 806-821/851-866 MHz Band CHANNELS IN THE CANADA BORDER REGIONS. Canada Border Region General Category channels where 800 MHz high density cellular systems are prohibited. General Category channels where 800 MHz high density cellular
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-535A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-535A1.pdf
  • deploy EAS ``until 1Q09.'' In that same Amended Petition, NTELOS asserts that it ``continues to educate each customer wishing to sign up for our IPTV service about the EAS situation and we explain that EAS is only available currently on the broadcast channels in our lineup.'' Based on our review of the NTELOS petitions, we find that, consistent with Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules and WAIT Radio, NTELOS has demonstrated unique factual circumstances, i.e., that technical limitations of its IPTV system architecture prevented NTELOS from complying with the Commission's EAS compliance deadline, and, it had no reasonable alternative by which to provide EAS on all of the channels it carries prior to its proposed implementation date. However, NTELOS fails to
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-694A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-694A1.pdf
  • and Homeland Security Bureau. - FCC - EAS Participants include television and radio broadcasters. 47 C.F.R. � 11.2(c). 47 C.F.R. Part 11. Id. at � 11.31(c). See 47 C.F.R. � 11.61(a)(1) and (2). 47 C.F.R. � 11.61(a)(4). We note that the Commission's rules also prohibit transmission of false or deceptive EAS messages. See 47 C.F.R. � 11.45. 47 C.F.R � 1.3. See Northeast Cellular Telephone Co., L.P. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). See WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969), aff'd, 459 F.2d 1203 (D.C. Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972) (WAIT Radio) Id. (citing Rio Grande Family Radio Fellowship, Inc. v. FCC, 406 F.2d 664 (D.C. Cir. 1968)); Birach Broadcasting
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1051A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1051A1.pdf
  • communications system authorized under call sign WQJA236. On June 19, 2008, the Bureau granted Wyoming a waiver authorizing it to use, for public safety purposes, eleven VHF frequency pairs allocated for Part 22 one-way or two-way public land mobile service. Wyoming seeks a waiver for the instant modification pursuant to Section 337(c) of the Act, or in the alternative, Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules. Station WQJA236 permits operation on eleven Part 22 public mobile service frequency pairs at twelve repeater sites (and associated mobile units) ``spread over Basic Economic Area (BEA) Nos. 143, 144, and 152.'' During the course of construction of Station WQJA236, Wyoming ``determined that it will need a limited number of additional sites to ensure
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-139A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-139A1.pdf
  • the end of the use period and to take any other steps necessary to ensure that the handsets will not be made available to any person other than Agency personnel and other authorized government users. ordering clauses 6. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the Waiver Petition filed by Verizon Wireless IS GRANTED as noted herein. 7. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.191 and 0.392 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.191, 0.392. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION James Arden Barnett. Jr., Rear Admiral (Ret.) Chief, Public Safety
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1697A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1697A1.pdf
  • 30, 2007, and cautioned that any equipment deployed outside of the consolidated channels after August 30, 2007, would be ineligible for relocation funding. You therefore seek waiver relief until June 30, 2011, to reband the majority of [ORION] subscribers as well as the infrastructure at all 14 of the ORION radio site[s] with the appropriate post[-]consolidation frequencies.'' Pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and on our own motion, we find that partial grant of the waiver request, as amended, is appropriate under the circumstances presented. Specifically, we find that the public interest in providing ORION adequate time to complete the ``first touch'' on the majority of existing ORION subscribers prior to rebanding the infrastructure at
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1083A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1083A1.pdf
  • Bureau See File No. 0003304375 and attached Request for Waiver of Eligibility Restrictions from Cindy Matzel, Frequency Coordinator, AASHTO, to Federal Communications Commission (filed Jan. 28, 2008, amended Feb. 21, 2008, Feb. 29, 2008, and Apr. 9, 2008) (Amended Waiver Request). 47 C.F.R. Part 22. 47 U.S.C. � 337(c). 47 C.F.R. � 22.621. Additionally, on our own motion under Sections 1.3 and 1.925(a) of the Commission's rules, we consider waiver relief of Sections 20.9(a)(6) and 22.623(b). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925(a), 20.9(a)(6), 22.623(b). 47 C.F.R. � 1.925; Amended Waiver Request at 1. Frequency 470.1000 MHz is interleaved between existing Part 22 point-to-multipoint frequencies 470.0875 and 470.1125 MHz. See 47 C.F.R. � 22.621. Frequency 473.1000 MHz is interleaved between existing Part 22
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1084A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1084A1.pdf
  • 2, 2009, April 3, 2009, Sept. 10, 2009, and Oct. 5, 2009) and associated attachments ``Request for Waiver'' filed June 18, 2007, as revised Oct. 24, 2007 (Waiver Request). 47 C.F.R. Part 22. 47 U.S.C. � 337(c). 47 C.F.R. �� 20.9(a)(6), 22.621, and 22.651. See Waiver Request at 1; 47 C.F.R. � 1.925. Additionally, on our own motion under Sections 1.3 and 1.925(a) of the Commission's rules, we consider waiver relief of Section 22.623(b). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925(a), 22.623(b). Waiver Request at 2. Pursuant to a Commission reorganization effective September 25, 2006, the relevant duties of the Public Safety and Critical Infrastructure Division of the Wireless Telecommunication Bureau were assumed by the Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau's Policy Division,
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-360A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-360A1.pdf
  • radio sites with the post-consolidation frequencies, resulting in a better coordinated rebanding effort, reduced costs to the FCC and Verizon, and will free up the pre-consolidation spectrum.'' In our September 7 Interim Relief Grant, we noted that a further request for extension of time and STA may be warranted. Upon review of the instant Renewal Request, and pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and on our own motion, we find that extension of waiver relief and STA is consistent with the public interest. Specifically, we find that grant of additional time will enable ORION to reband the majority of the system subscribers and infrastructure at all 14 ORION radio sites with the post-consolidation frequencies. While
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-834A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-834A1.pdf
  • Homeland Security Bureau See File No. 0003190744 (filed Oct. 4, 2007, as amended Dec. 27, 2007 (attaching Petition (requesting waiver) and submitting amendment to the request) (Waiver Request); Jan. 22, 2009 (Amended Waiver Request) (attaching Amendment to Engineering Report (Amended Engineering Report)). 47 C.F.R. �� 20.9(a)(6), 22.621. See Amended Waiver Request at 1-2. Additionally, on our own motion under Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, we consider waiver relief of Section 22.623(b). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 22.623(b). 47 U.S.C. � 337(c). 47 C.F.R. � 1.925. Waiver Request at 1-2. File No. 0003190744, Attachment ``MERA Pt.22 Ex 3,'' Letter from Robert T. Doyle, Sheriff, Marin County Sheriff's Office, to Chief, Policy Division, PSHSB, FCC (July 11, 2007) (Marin County Sheriff Letter). Waiver
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-789A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-789A1.pdf
  • by the president of Mount Rushmore. After being informed that the Mount Rushmore president was in the area, the agent left his business card with an employee who agreed to have the president contact the agent, however, the agent never heard from the president. Also on June 1, 2011, the Denver agent inspected the Station KZMX-FM transmitter facility located approximately 1.3 miles from the Stations' main studio location. The agent observed that Station KZMX-FM was operating using a 4-bay, circularly polarized FM antenna, while a 4-bay horizontal FM antenna was on the ground near the KZMX-FM tower. According to the Station KZMX-FM license, it is authorized to operate using horizontal polarization only. In the morning of June 2, 2011, the Denver
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264395A6.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264395A6.pdf
  • ���R endstream endobj 28 0 obj<> endobj 29 0 obj<> endobj 30 0 obj<> endobj 31 0 obj<>stream xmlns:pdf='http://ns.adobe.com/pdf/1.3/' pdf:Producer='Acrobat Distiller 6.0.1 (Windows)'> Establishment of Public Safety & Homeland Security Bureau endstream endobj 32 0 obj<> endobj xref 0 168
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275666A1.pdf
  • 8bit Initial Evaluation of the Performance of Prototype TV- Band White Space Devices July 31, 2007 Technical Research Branch Laboratory Division Office of Engineering and Technology Federal Communications Commission OET Report Prepared by: FCC/OET 07-TR-1006 Steven K. Jones Thomas W. Phillips ii Table of Contents Executive Summary.....................................................................................................................................vi 1 Introduction.........................................................................................................................................1 1.1 TV Band Incumbent Uses............................................................................................................2 1.2 Interference Concerns, and Test Objectives................................................................................3 1.3 Test Scope and Approach............................................................................................................4 1.3.1 Assessing Sensing Ability and Interference Potential with respect to Television Services....5 1.3.2 Assessing Sensing Ability and Interference Potential with respect to Wireless Microphones6 2 White Space Prototype Devices.........................................................................................................7 2.1 Prototype A (Versions 1 and 2)...................................................................................................7 2.2 Prototype B................................................................................................................................10 3 DTV Scanning/Spectrum Sensing Capability Tests.......................................................................11 3.1 Test Approach...........................................................................................................................11 3.2 Bench Tests to Determine Minimum DTV Signal
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286371A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286371A1.pdf
  • 1091/Filter/FlateDecode>>stream &*(�� k3(c)�I�W��� �-c�"n ��;��5�� 4Z#)���1�(c)� ��>�Ï�j6 endstream endobj 16 0 obj<> endobj 17 0 obj<> endobj 18 0 obj<> endobj 19 0 obj<>stream xmlns:pdf='http://ns.adobe.com/pdf/1.3/' pdf:Producer='Acrobat Distiller 6.0 (Windows)'> Keesha.Lomax endstream endobj 20 0 obj<> endobj xref 0 21 0000000000 65535 f 0000009190 00000 n 0000009316 00000 n 0000009410 00000 n 0000010381 00000 n 0000010507 00000 n 0000010601
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-107A1.pdf
  • increase in interference 132 New Skies Petition at 20-24 and Consolidated Reply at 3-4; as clarified in Letter from William M. Wiltshire, Counsel for New Skies Satellites, N.V. to Secretary, FCC, dated January 22, 2001(Wiltshire January 22 letter). 133 New Skies Petition at 21. 134 New Skies Petition at 22-23; Wiltshire January 22 letter at 1. 135 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 ("Any provision of the rules may be waived by the Commission on its own motion or on petition if good cause therefor is shown"). WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969)("WAIT Radio"). While we address New Skies' request as a petition for waiver, we could have treated it as a request to modify the licenses issued in
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-108A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-108A1.pdf
  • supra n.2, at Appendix B. Figure is for wireline and wireless carriers. Id. Figure is for wireline carriers only. Based on 96-98 million U.S. households with wireline telephone service, the cost would average 28 cents per subscribing household. See n.153, supra. Specifically, a $27 million charge to carriers, converted to a rate increase to 96-98 million residential ratepayers, would average 1.3 cents per month per ratepayer using a relatively rapid amortization period of two years and a relatively high discount rate of 12%; and would average 0.5 cents per month per ratepayer using a relatively slow amortization period of 5 years and a relatively low discount rate of 6%. See � 8, supra. House Report No. 103-827, at 3493. USTA Comments,
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-126A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-126A1.pdf
  • period of time is necessary to protect the integrity of the program, and to guard against the possibility of additional waste, fraud, and abuse. Accordingly, we debar NextiraOne. We also deny NextiraOne's request to waive the debarment rule in this case. Those who seek to avoid debarment by requesting waiver of the rule must meet a similarly high burden. Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules governs petitions for waiver generally, and provides that a waiver may be granted upon ``good cause shown.'' Because Commission rules are presumed valid, the petitioner bears a heavy burden. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule ``only if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule and such a deviation will serve
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-162A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-162A1.pdf
  • handsets. Specifically, we extend the date by which Appalachian must achieve 95% penetration to December 31, 2006. We further impose the conditions and reporting requirements described above to ensure that Appalachian achieves full compliance with the Commission's E911 requirements. ordering clauses IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the ENHANCE 911 Act, Pub. L. No. 108-494, 118 Stat. 3986 (2004), and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the foregoing Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Request for Additional Limited Waiver and Extension of the Handset Penetration Deadline of the Commission's Phase II E911 Rules by East Kentucky Network, LLC d/b/a Appalachian Wireless IS GRANTED, subject to the conditions and reporting requirements specified
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-171A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-171A1.pdf
  • find that Dobson has failed to satisfy the Commission's waiver standards. For these reasons, we deny Dobson's request to waive the handset penetration deadline. In light of the particular circumstances faced by Dobson, however, we will not pursue enforcement action with respect to Dobson's failure to timely comply with Section 20.18(g)(1)(v). ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED pursuant to Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the foregoing Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Dobson Cellular Systems, Inc. Request for Limited Waiver of December 31, 2005 E911 Deadline IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary See Dobson Cellular Systems, Inc. Request for Limited Waiver of December 31, 2005 E911
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-183A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-183A1.pdf
  • contained in this proceeding. In addition, we note that pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4), we previously sought specific comment on how the Commission might ``further reduce the information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees.'' ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 1.925, that the foregoing Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Request for Limited Waiver by Sprint Nextel Corporation, filed Sept. 29, 2005, IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Sprint Nextel is subject to the reporting requirements specified herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the matter
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-184A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-184A1.pdf
  • contained in this proceeding. In addition, we note that pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4), we previously sought specific comment on how the Commission might ``further reduce the information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees.'' ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, that the foregoing Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Limited Waiver by Nextel Partners, Inc., filed Oct. 21, 2005, IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Nextel Partners is subject to the reporting requirements specified herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the matter of the non-compliance of Nextel Partners
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-59A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-59A1.pdf
  • for addressing individual requests for waiver. Instead, the Commission will continue to apply its well-established waiver criteria, and the standard enunciated under the ENHANCE 911 Act, on a case-by-case basis, in evaluating requests for waiver of the December 31, 2005 handset penetration requirement contained in Section 20.18(g)(1)(v) of the Commission's Rules. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the foregoing Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Joint Petition for Suspension or Waiver of the Location-Capable Handset Penetration Deadline filed by CTIA - The Wireless Association and the Rural Cellular Association IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary APPENDIX Comments ACS Wireless,
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-60A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-60A1.pdf
  • contained in this proceeding. In addition, we note that pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4), we previously sought specific comment on how the Commission might ``further reduce the information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees.'' ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the foregoing Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Request for Limited Waiver by Verizon IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that Verizon is subject to the reporting requirements specified herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary See Request for Limited Waiver by Verizon Wireless,
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-61A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-61A1.pdf
  • contained in this proceeding. In addition, we note that pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4), we previously sought specific comment on how the Commission might ``further reduce the information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees.'' ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED pursuant to Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the foregoing Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Petition for Limited Waiver and Brief Extension of Leap Wireless International, Inc. IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that Leap is subject to the reporting requirements specified herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Qwest Wireless, LLC
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-64A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-64A1.pdf
  • contained in this proceeding. In addition, we note that pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4), we previously sought specific comment on how the Commission might ``further reduce the information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees.'' ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED pursuant to Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the foregoing Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Alltel Corporation Petition for Limited Waiver IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that Alltel is subject to the reporting requirements specified herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the matter of Alltel's non-compliance with Section 20.18(g)(1)(v) SHALL BE
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-65A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-65A1.pdf
  • contained in this proceeding. In addition, we note that pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4), we previously sought specific comment on how the Commission might ``further reduce the information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees.'' ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED pursuant to Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the foregoing Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Request of Centennial Communications Corp. for Limited Waiver/Extension of Location-Capable Handset Penetration Deadline IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Centennial is subject to the reporting requirements specified herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Request
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-66A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-66A1.pdf
  • contained in this proceeding. In addition, we note that pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4), we previously sought specific comment on how the Commission might ``further reduce the information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees.'' ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED pursuant to Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the foregoing Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Request for a Limited Waiver of United States Cellular Corporation IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that USCC is subject to the reporting requirements specified herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the matter of USCC's non-compliance with
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-107A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-107A1.pdf
  • service in the affected areas and shelters around the country. See Written Statement of Kevin J. Martin, Chairman, Federal Communications Commission at Hearing on Public Safety Communications from 9/11 to Katrina: Critical Public Policy Lessons, Before the Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Internet, Committee on Energy and Commerce, U.S. House of Representatives (September 29, 2005). See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.915(b), 1.925, 1.931(b)(5). See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. � 90.407 (providing a self-actuating mechanism whereby private land mobile and public safety licensees may utilize their radio stations for emergency communications in a manner other than that specified in the station authorization or in the rules and regulations governing the operation of such stations, during a period of emergency in which the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-10A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-10A1.pdf
  • consistent with the waiver standards set out in Section 1.925 of the Commission's rules, and the Commission's E911 Phase II waiver standards, including a demonstration of a clear path to full compliance. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 405 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i) and 405, and Sections 1.3, 1.106, and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.106, and 1.925, that the foregoing Order on Reconsideration IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Joint Petition for Reconsideration filed by the Commnet Carriers IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary See Revision of the Commission's Rules to Ensure Compatibility with Enhanced 911 Emergency Calling
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-132A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-132A1.pdf
  • such leased spectrum. � 90.1432 Conditions for waiver to allow limited and temporary wideband operations in the 700 MHz Public Safety spectrum. (a) Wideband operations in the 700 MHz Public Safety spectrum. Wideband operations are prohibited in the public safety allocation of the 700 MHz band public safety spectrum except where the Commission has granted a waiver pursuant to �� 1.3 and 1.925 of this chapter and subject to the additional conditions and requirements specified below. Grants of waiver are restricted to the deployment of a wideband system in the consolidated narrowband portion or the internal public safety guard band portion of the public safety broadband spectrum. Where spectrum in the narrowband segment or internal guard band segment is unavailable for
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-162A1.pdf
  • FCC Rcd 14969 (2004). Federal Communications Commission FCC 07-162 2 obligation isto complete relocation of all BAS facilities by September 7,2007.3 3. On September 4, 2007, Sprint Nextel, MSTV, NAB and SBE filed a Joint Petition requesting that the Commission waive the current BAS transition completion date for an additional twenty-nine months. On our own motion, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. �1.3, we hereby waivethe deadlineby which Sprint Nextel must complete relocation of the broadcast auxiliary service to frequencies above 2025 MHz for a period of 60 days(i.e., the new deadlinewill becomeNovember 6, 2007). This will providethe Commission with time to consider the issues raised bythe Joint Petition. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and (j) of the Communications
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-177A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-177A1.pdf
  • at (202) 418-0530, TTY (202) 418-0432. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 1, 4(i)-(k), 4(o), 201, 218, 219, 301, 303(g), 303(j), 303(r), 332, 403, 405, 621(b)(3) and 621(d) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i)-(k), 154(o), 201, 218, 219, 301, 303(g), 303(j), 303(r), 332, 403, 405, 541(b)(3), and 541(d), and Sections 1.3 and 1.106 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.106, that this Order on Reconsideration in EB Docket No. 06-119 and WC Docket No. 06-63 IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Petitions for Reconsideration filed by The American Association of Paging Carriers, the DAS Forum, MetroPCS Communications, Inc., NextG Networks, Inc., PCIA - The Wireless Infrastructure Association
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-192A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-192A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-192A1.txt
  • 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on or before 30 days after publication of the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in the Federal Register and reply comments on or before 45 days after publication in the Federal Register. he Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the requirements of sections 20.19(c)(1)(ii), 20.19(c)(2)(ii), and 20.19(c)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 20.19(c)(1)(ii), 20.19(c)(2)(ii), 20.19(c)(3)(ii), ARE STAYED until April 18, 2008. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Commission's Consumer Information Bureau, Reference Information Center, SHALL SEND a copy of the Second Report and Order and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, including the IRFA, to the Chief Counsel for
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-5A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-5A1.pdf
  • is entitled to a limited extension of the deadline by which it was required to achieve 95% penetration among its subscribers of location-capable handsets. Accordingly, we grant, nunc pro tunc, Illinois Valley's request for additional waiver and extend the date by which Illinois Valley must achieve 95% penetration to December 12, 2006. ordering clauses IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the foregoing Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that Illinois Valley's Request for Additional Limited Waiver and Extension of the Handset Penetration Deadline of the Commission's Phase II E911 Rules IS GRANTED, nunc pro tunc. The deadline for compliance with section 20.18(g)(1)(v) of the Commission's rules is
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-73A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-73A1.pdf
  • contributions. In light of the seriousness, duration and scope of Carrera's violations, we conclude that the forfeiture proposed in the Carrera NAL and revised as set forth above to $345,900 is warranted. V. ORDERING CLAUSES 20. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 303(r) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 303(r), and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, Carrera's Petition for Waiver is GRANTED. 21. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT, pursuant to section 503(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 503(b), and section 1.80 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.80, Carrera IS LIABLE FOR A MONETARY FORFEITURE in the amount of $345,900 for willfully and repeatedly violating the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-9A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-9A1.pdf
  • the date by which Washington RSA 8 must achieve 95% penetration to August 8, 2007. We further impose the conditions and reporting requirements described herein to ensure that Washington RSA 8 achieves full compliance with the Commission's E911 requirements. ordering clauses IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the ENHANCE 911 Act, Pub. L. No. 108-494, 118 Stat. 3986 (2004), and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the foregoing Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Request for Additional Limited Waiver and Extension of the Handset Penetration Deadline of the Commission's Phase II E911 Rules by Washington RSA No. 8 Limited Partnership IS GRANTED IN PART, subject to the conditions and reporting requirements
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-159A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-159A1.pdf
  • the potential customer base, and the ``self-certification'' as common carriers - were suggested by the Complaint itself, and are not complex. Thus, Verizon has had an adequate opportunity to respond. Accordingly, to the extent that our rules require those facts to be alleged more clearly in the Complaint, we waive those rules for good cause shown. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.721, 1.726. See NARUC I, 525 F.2d at 608. As mentioned previously, ``[o]ne may be a common carrier though the nature of the service rendered is sufficiently specialized as to be of possible use to only a fraction of the total population.'' NARUC I, 525 F.2d at 608. This undermines the probative value of the fact that the Comcast and
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-8A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-8A1.pdf
  • own motion, we stay the February 17, 2009 deadline for relocating existing narrowband operations to the consolidated narrowband channels (769-775/799-805 MHz) until a new deadline is established in a subsequent order in this proceeding. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and (j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i) and (j), and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that the February 17, 2009 deadline for consolidating existing narrowband operations to the upper half of the 700 MHz Public Safety band (769-775/799-805 MHz) IS STAYED until a new effective deadline is adopted in a subsequent order in this proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the effective date of this Order is
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-191A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-191A1.pdf
  • issuing a statement. introduction Section 11.56 of our rules states in relevant part that ``all EAS Participants must be able to receive CAP-formatted EAS alerts no later than 180 days after FEMA publishes the technical standards and requirements for such FEMA transmissions'' (the CAP reception requirement). In this order, for the reasons set forth herein, we waive pursuant to section 1.3 of our rules the 180-day period for implementation of the CAP reception requirement until September 30, 2011. We believe that this amount of time will prove sufficient for an orderly and efficient implementation of the CAP reception requirement. Background On July 12, 2007, the Commission adopted the EAS Second Report and Order, in which it revised its Part 11 EAS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/SilverStream/Pages/edocs.html
  • well as other numeric fields. The EDOCS advanced query works with any data element or combination of data elements. Using more search terms will give a more precise result and fewer retrievals. The results of your query are displayed in reverse chronological order. Filter By options gives the ability to further narrow down the search results. last reviewed/updated on 06/21/2012 v1.3.27 __________________________________________________________________ [15]Skip Bottom FCC Navigation Links and Contact Info [16]FCC Home | [17]Search | [18]RSS | [19]Updates | [20]E-Filing | [21]Initiatives | [22]Consumers | [23]Find People __________________________________________________________________ References 1. http://www.fcc.gov/ 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/edocsLink.do;jsessionid=QB2c4yc8zFpttjG6XYxhh2vz1zMwnLxNLrcc2xcdQJQ4RvgTkcJH!-1988856719!1771431303?mode=basic&type=n 3. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/edocsLink.do;jsessionid=QB2c4yc8zFpttjG6XYxhh2vz1zMwnLxNLrcc2xcdQJQ4RvgTkcJH!-1988856719!1771431303?mode=advance&type=n 4. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/edocsLink.do;jsessionid=QB2c4yc8zFpttjG6XYxhh2vz1zMwnLxNLrcc2xcdQJQ4RvgTkcJH!-1988856719!1771431303?mode=definitions 5. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/edocsLink.do;jsessionid=QB2c4yc8zFpttjG6XYxhh2vz1zMwnLxNLrcc2xcdQJQ4RvgTkcJH!-1988856719!1771431303?mode=instructions 6. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/edocsLink.do;jsessionid=QB2c4yc8zFpttjG6XYxhh2vz1zMwnLxNLrcc2xcdQJQ4RvgTkcJH!-1988856719!1771431303?mode=faqs 7. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/edocsLink.do;jsessionid=QB2c4yc8zFpttjG6XYxhh2vz1zMwnLxNLrcc2xcdQJQ4RvgTkcJH!-1988856719!1771431303?mode=digest 8. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/releasedToday.do;jsessionid=QB2c4yc8zFpttjG6XYxhh2vz1zMwnLxNLrcc2xcdQJQ4RvgTkcJH!-1988856719!1771431303? 9. http://www.fcc.gov/Document_Indexes/ 10. mailto:EDOCSHelp@fcc.gov 11. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/edocsLink.do;jsessionid=QB2c4yc8zFpttjG6XYxhh2vz1zMwnLxNLrcc2xcdQJQ4RvgTkcJH!-1988856719!1771431303?mode=digest 12. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/edocsLink.do;jsessionid=QB2c4yc8zFpttjG6XYxhh2vz1zMwnLxNLrcc2xcdQJQ4RvgTkcJH!-1988856719!1771431303?mode=advance&type=n 13. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/edocsLink.do;jsessionid=QB2c4yc8zFpttjG6XYxhh2vz1zMwnLxNLrcc2xcdQJQ4RvgTkcJH!-1988856719!1771431303?mode=basic&type=n 14. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/edocsLink.do;jsessionid=QB2c4yc8zFpttjG6XYxhh2vz1zMwnLxNLrcc2xcdQJQ4RvgTkcJH!-1988856719!1771431303?mode=advance&type=n 15. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/#skipbottomnav 16. http://www.fcc.gov/
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/SilverStream/Pages/edocsAdvanceSearch.html
  • well as other numeric fields. The EDOCS advanced query works with any data element or combination of data elements. Using more search terms will give a more precise result and fewer retrievals. The results of your query are displayed in reverse chronological order. Filter By options gives the ability to further narrow down the search results. last reviewed/updated on 06/21/2012 v1.3.27 __________________________________________________________________ [15]Skip Bottom FCC Navigation Links and Contact Info [16]FCC Home | [17]Search | [18]RSS | [19]Updates | [20]E-Filing | [21]Initiatives | [22]Consumers | [23]Find People __________________________________________________________________ References 1. http://www.fcc.gov/ 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/edocsLink.do;jsessionid=QB2dvQyBLlQJnmpvmQjHvFHdM9YJnTKnwzPw4HvHDnZQQnyrNXQJ!-1988856719!1771431303?mode=basic&type=n 3. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/edocsLink.do;jsessionid=QB2dvQyBLlQJnmpvmQjHvFHdM9YJnTKnwzPw4HvHDnZQQnyrNXQJ!-1988856719!1771431303?mode=advance&type=n 4. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/edocsLink.do;jsessionid=QB2dvQyBLlQJnmpvmQjHvFHdM9YJnTKnwzPw4HvHDnZQQnyrNXQJ!-1988856719!1771431303?mode=definitions 5. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/edocsLink.do;jsessionid=QB2dvQyBLlQJnmpvmQjHvFHdM9YJnTKnwzPw4HvHDnZQQnyrNXQJ!-1988856719!1771431303?mode=instructions 6. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/edocsLink.do;jsessionid=QB2dvQyBLlQJnmpvmQjHvFHdM9YJnTKnwzPw4HvHDnZQQnyrNXQJ!-1988856719!1771431303?mode=faqs 7. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/edocsLink.do;jsessionid=QB2dvQyBLlQJnmpvmQjHvFHdM9YJnTKnwzPw4HvHDnZQQnyrNXQJ!-1988856719!1771431303?mode=digest 8. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/releasedToday.do;jsessionid=QB2dvQyBLlQJnmpvmQjHvFHdM9YJnTKnwzPw4HvHDnZQQnyrNXQJ!-1988856719!1771431303? 9. http://www.fcc.gov/Document_Indexes/ 10. mailto:EDOCSHelp@fcc.gov 11. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/edocsLink.do;jsessionid=QB2dvQyBLlQJnmpvmQjHvFHdM9YJnTKnwzPw4HvHDnZQQnyrNXQJ!-1988856719!1771431303?mode=digest 12. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/edocsLink.do;jsessionid=QB2dvQyBLlQJnmpvmQjHvFHdM9YJnTKnwzPw4HvHDnZQQnyrNXQJ!-1988856719!1771431303?mode=advance&type=n 13. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/edocsLink.do;jsessionid=QB2dvQyBLlQJnmpvmQjHvFHdM9YJnTKnwzPw4HvHDnZQQnyrNXQJ!-1988856719!1771431303?mode=basic&type=n 14. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/edocsLink.do;jsessionid=QB2dvQyBLlQJnmpvmQjHvFHdM9YJnTKnwzPw4HvHDnZQQnyrNXQJ!-1988856719!1771431303?mode=advance&type=n 15. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/#skipbottomnav 16. http://www.fcc.gov/
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/SilverStream/Pages/instructions.html
  • well as other numeric fields. The EDOCS advanced query works with any data element or combination of data elements. Using more search terms will give a more precise result and fewer retrievals. The results of your query are displayed in reverse chronological order. Filter By options gives the ability to further narrow down the search results. last reviewed/updated on 06/21/2012 v1.3.27 __________________________________________________________________ [15]Skip Bottom FCC Navigation Links and Contact Info [16]FCC Home | [17]Search | [18]RSS | [19]Updates | [20]E-Filing | [21]Initiatives | [22]Consumers | [23]Find People __________________________________________________________________ References 1. http://www.fcc.gov/ 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/edocsLink.do;jsessionid=QB2p7MRw8pcbtGtByck2lQyj2G1L24L2pdM598rTN2Nmwngpg0XX!-1988856719!1771431303?mode=basic&type=n 3. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/edocsLink.do;jsessionid=QB2p7MRw8pcbtGtByck2lQyj2G1L24L2pdM598rTN2Nmwngpg0XX!-1988856719!1771431303?mode=advance&type=n 4. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/edocsLink.do;jsessionid=QB2p7MRw8pcbtGtByck2lQyj2G1L24L2pdM598rTN2Nmwngpg0XX!-1988856719!1771431303?mode=definitions 5. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/edocsLink.do;jsessionid=QB2p7MRw8pcbtGtByck2lQyj2G1L24L2pdM598rTN2Nmwngpg0XX!-1988856719!1771431303?mode=instructions 6. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/edocsLink.do;jsessionid=QB2p7MRw8pcbtGtByck2lQyj2G1L24L2pdM598rTN2Nmwngpg0XX!-1988856719!1771431303?mode=faqs 7. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/edocsLink.do;jsessionid=QB2p7MRw8pcbtGtByck2lQyj2G1L24L2pdM598rTN2Nmwngpg0XX!-1988856719!1771431303?mode=digest 8. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/releasedToday.do;jsessionid=QB2p7MRw8pcbtGtByck2lQyj2G1L24L2pdM598rTN2Nmwngpg0XX!-1988856719!1771431303? 9. http://www.fcc.gov/Document_Indexes/ 10. mailto:EDOCSHelp@fcc.gov 11. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/edocsLink.do;jsessionid=QB2p7MRw8pcbtGtByck2lQyj2G1L24L2pdM598rTN2Nmwngpg0XX!-1988856719!1771431303?mode=digest 12. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/edocsLink.do;jsessionid=QB2p7MRw8pcbtGtByck2lQyj2G1L24L2pdM598rTN2Nmwngpg0XX!-1988856719!1771431303?mode=advance&type=n 13. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/edocsLink.do;jsessionid=QB2p7MRw8pcbtGtByck2lQyj2G1L24L2pdM598rTN2Nmwngpg0XX!-1988856719!1771431303?mode=basic&type=n 14. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/edocsLink.do;jsessionid=QB2p7MRw8pcbtGtByck2lQyj2G1L24L2pdM598rTN2Nmwngpg0XX!-1988856719!1771431303?mode=advance&type=n 15. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/#skipbottomnav 16. http://www.fcc.gov/
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1077A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1077A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1077A1.txt
  • U.S., L.P., Motorola Cellular Service, Inc., and Motorola Worldwide Information Network Services, DA 99-1688 (released August 23, 1999) (Iridium Waiver Order). In the Matter of Stratos Mobile Networks, Order DA 00-82, WTB, rel. January 18, 2000. The two earlier decisions were the GTE Waiver Order, and the Iridium Waiver Order. Amendment to Waiver Request, filed February 8, 2000. See Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 37 C.F.R � 1.3; WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972). CMRS Forbearance Order, 13 FCC Rcd. at 16884. See In the Matter of Regulation of International Accounting Rates, CC Docket No. 90-337, Phase II, Fourth Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 20,063 (1996) (Flexibility Order). Id.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1100A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1100A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1100A1.txt
  • 4-A337), in which case the applicant must indicate in Exhibit E that it has filed a confidentiality request. Because the required information bears on applicants' qualifications, the FCC envisions that confidentiality requests will not be routinely granted. Waivers: Applicants requesting waiver of any rules must submit a statement of reasons sufficient to justify the waiver sought. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. X. ATTACHMENT E AUCTION-SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR FCC REMITTANCE ADVICE (FCC FORM 159) Upfront Payments The following information supplements the standard instructions for FCC Form 159, and is provided to help ensure correct completion of FCC Form 159 for upfront payments for Auction No. 34. Applicants need to complete FCC Form 159 carefully, since: Mistakes may affect their bidding eligibility; and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-112A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-112A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-112A1.txt
  • Division), in which case the applicant must indicate in Exhibit E that it has filed a confidentiality request. Because the required information bears on applicants' qualifications, the FCC envisions that confidentiality requests will not be routinely granted. Waivers: Applicants requesting waiver of any rules must submit a statement of reasons sufficient to justify the waiver sought. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. AUCTION-SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR FCC REMITTANCE ADVICE (FCC FORM 159) Upfront Payments The following information supplements the standard instructions for FCC Form 159, and is provided to help ensure correct completion of FCC Form 159 for upfront payments for Auction No. 30. Applicants need to complete FCC Form 159 carefully, since: Mistakes may affect their bidding eligibility; and Lack of consistency
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1161A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1161A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1161A1.txt
  • file appropriate applications to accomplish the necessary divestitures by this date, whether to the contemplated carrier, to another carrier, or to a divestiture trust that complies with the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to sections 1, 2, and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 152, and 154(i), and sections 0.331, 1.3, 1.925(a), and 20.6(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 U.S.C. �� 0.331, 1.3, 1.925(a), 20.6(a), the Request for Extension of Waiver filed by VoiceStream Wireless Corporation and Omnipoint Corporation is GRANTED as indicated herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William W. Kunze Deputy Chief, Commercial Wireless Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 20.6. Pursuant to Section 20.6(e)(1), divestiture of interests exceeding the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1278A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1278A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1278A1.txt
  • School Board of Brevard County, to Federal Communications Commission, filed February 8, 2000 (Letter of Appeal). Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Joe Boyle and Lori Fadok, Brevard County School District, dated November 2, 1999 (Funding Commitment Decision Letter). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). 47 C.F.R.� 1.7. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. -1278 -1278 � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1321A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1321A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1321A1.txt
  • (namely, 117.975 MHz to 136.975 MHz). The listed frequencies are based on 25 kHz spacing. There is no provision in the Commission's Rules for operating on 8.33-kHz spaced channels as envisioned by the ICAO channel plan. Accordingly, type certification of dual spacing transceivers may not be obtained absent a waiver of Section 87.173(b) of the Commission's Rules. DISCUSSION . Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules permits waiver of any rule provision for good cause shown. We find that the waiver requested by Wulfsberg is warranted. We note, as an initial matter, that we have granted similar waivers regarding dual spacing transceivers. As we have noted previously, two industry standard setting organizations, RTCA, Inc. (RTCA) and Aeronautical Radio, Inc. (ARINC), have approved
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1336A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1336A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1336A1.txt
  • it would need to obtain service. We have determined in another context that replacing existing equipment is not per se an unreasonable alternative. Therefore, a waiver is not warranted under the instant circumstances. ORDERING CLAUSES 12. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 405 of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 405, and Sections 1.3 and 1.106 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.106, the Request for Reconsideration and Waiver, filed on March 2, 1999, by Fresno City and County Housing Authorities IS DENIED. 13 . This action is taken under designated authority pursuant to Sections 0.131 and 0.331 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131. 0.331. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION D'wana R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1388A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1388A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1388A1.txt
  • 4-A337), in which case the applicant must indicate in Exhibit E that it has filed a confidentiality request. Because the required information bears on applicants' qualifications, the FCC envisions that confidentiality requests will not be routinely granted. Waivers: Applicants requesting waiver of any rules must submit a statement of reasons sufficient to justify the waiver sought. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. ATTACHMENT E AUCTION-SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR FCC REMITTANCE ADVICE (FCC FORM 159) Upfront Payments The following information supplements the standard instructions for FCC Form 159, and is provided to help ensure correct completion of FCC Form 159 for upfront payments for Auction No. 36. Applicants need to complete FCC Form 159 carefully, since: Mistakes may affect their bidding eligibility; and Lack
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1404A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1404A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1404A1.txt
  • frustrated by application to the instant case, and that grant of the waiver would be in the public interest; or (2) in view of the unique or unusual factual circumstances of the instant case, application of the rule would be inequitable, unduly burdensome or contrary to the public interest, or the applicant has no reasonable alternative. Alternatively, under Commission rule 1.3, the Commission has authority to waive its rules if there is ``good cause'' to do so. American Wireless asserts three basic reasons as grounds for granting its waiver request. First, it asserts that prolonged negotiations with Bay Springs, as well as the additional time involved in obtaining Commission consent to the assignment (nearly four months in this instance), prevented American
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1471A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1471A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1471A1.txt
  • 202 / 418-2555 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 DA 00-1471 Friday, June 30, 2000 WAIVER OF THE INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENTS POLICY Unless otherwise specified, the following procedures apply to the applications listed below: The applications listed below have been found, upon initial review, to be acceptable for filing pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. These applications shall not be deemed granted until the Commission affirmatively acts upon the application, either by public notice or by written order. Operation for which authorization is sought may not commence except in accordance with any terms or conditions imposed by the Commission. Unless otherwise specified, interested parties may file comments
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1483A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1483A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1483A1.txt
  • the marketplace. We have before us the above-captioned petitions filed by certain cable operators seeking a waiver of Section 76.1204 for some of their cable systems that utilize hybrid navigation devices. The petitioners indicate that they will be in violation of the Commission's rules for systems deploying a hybrid set-top box unless the waiver is granted. DISCUSSION Pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, the Commission may grant a waiver of a provision of its rules upon a showing of "good cause." Waiver of the Commission's rules, however, is appropriate only if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, and such a deviation will serve the public interest. In the instant matters, despite a two-year period from the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1486A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1486A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1486A1.txt
  • 4-A435), in which case the applicant must indicate in Exhibit E that it has filed a confidentiality request. Because the required information bears on applicants' qualifications, the FCC envisions that confidentiality requests will not be routinely granted. Waivers: Applicants requesting waiver of any rules must submit a statement of reasons sufficient to justify the waiver sought. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Attachment e ACCESSING THE FCC NETWORK TO FILE FCC FORM 175 This attachment describes how to access the FCC Network from a system that is running the Microsoft Windows 95 or Microsoft Windows 98 operating system. This involves configuring dial-up network access and then performing the dial-up procedure. Note: Dial-up access to the FCC Network is not required to submit
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1525A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1525A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1525A1.txt
  • be served or would be frustrated by application to the instant case, and that grant of the waiver would be in the public interest; or (2) where petitioner establishes unique or unusual factual circumstances, application of the rule would be inequitable, unduly burdensome, or contrary to the public interest, or the applicant has no reasonable alternative. Alternatively, under Commission Rule 1.3, the Commission has authority to waive its rules if there is ``good cause'' to do so. 4. In its request, GTE states that because the assignment of the WPOI208 license from ELLTELL back to GTE occurred on June 20, 2000, GTE will not be able to meet the five-year benchmark requiring one-third coverage to the BTA by the June 23,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1606A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1606A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1606A1.txt
  • Petitioners have made the showings and commitments required by the AirCell Order, as amended, and the opposing carriers have not persuaded us that granting these identical waivers is otherwise contrary to the public interest, we hereby grant the Petitioners' requests for waiver of section 22.925 of the Commission rules. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE . Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1.3 and 22.119(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 22.119(a), that the requests of AirCell, Inc., Douglas Telecommunications, Inc., and California RSA No. 3, Limited Partnership, a California Limited Partnership d/b/a Golden State Cellular, for waiver of section 22.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 22.925, ARE GRANTED, subject to the terms and conditions set forth In re
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1762A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1762A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1762A1.txt
  • be served or would be frustrated by application to the instant case, and that grant of the waiver would be in the public interest; or (2) where the petitioner establishes unique or unusual factual circumstances, application of the rule would be inequitable, unduly burdensome, or contrary to the public interest, or the applicant has no reasonable alternative. Alternatively, under section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, the Commission has authority to waive its rules if there is ``good cause'' to do so. 8. On the facts before us, we find that a partial waiver of our 220 MHz construction requirements is warranted. On a nationwide basis, NRTC holds a total of 22 channels in the 220 MHz service, but because these channels
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-191A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-191A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-191A1.txt
  • ON NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.'S PETITION REGARDING PCS C AND F BLOCK SPECTRUM EXTENSION OF FILING DEADLINE FOR COMMENTS TO SBC COMMUNICATIONS INC.'S REQUEST FOR WAIVER Comment Date: February 14, 2000 Reply Date: February 22, 2000 Nextel Communications, Inc. (``Nextel'') has filed a petition requesting expedited rulemaking under Section 1.401, or in the alternative, waiver of the Commission's rules under Sections 1.3 and 1.925. Nextel seeks modification or waiver of the Commission's eligibility and bidding rules with respect to PCS C and F block spectrum. Section 24.709 of the Commission's rules restricts the eligibility for C and F block licenses to entities with total assets and gross revenues below specified levels. Nextel requests that the Commission allow companies other than such entities
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2259A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2259A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2259A1.txt
  • 4-A665), in which case the applicant must indicate in Exhibit G that it has filed a confidentiality request. Because the required information bears on applicants' qualifications, the FCC envisions that confidentiality requests will not be routinely granted. Waivers: Applicants requesting waiver of any rules must submit a statement of reasons sufficient to justify the waiver sought. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925. Attachment E AUCTION-SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR FCC REMITTANCE ADVICE (FCC FORM 159-July 1997 edition) Upfront Payments The following information supplements the standard instructions for FCC Form 159, and is provided to help ensure correct completion of FCC Form 159 for upfront payments for Auction No. 35. Applicants need to complete FCC Form 159 carefully, since: Mistakes may affect their bidding
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2321A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2321A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2321A1.txt
  • Therefore, we will allow carriers until March 1, 2001 to notify NECA of any changes in their July 1, 2001 tariff participation. . Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), and 201-205 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), (j), and 201-205, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition by NECA for interim waiver of section 69.3 of the Commission's rules IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mary Beth Richards Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau 47 C.F.R. �� 69.3(e)(6); (e)(9); (i)(1); and (j). National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., Petition for Rulemaking, RM 9486 (filed Feb. 8,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2382A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2382A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2382A1.txt
  • the 119� orbital cluster and that any permanent occupation at this location required ITU coordination and a Region 2 modification and update. See Letter from Chief, Satellite and Radiocommunication Division to David Moskowitz, Senior Vice President and General Counsel, EchoStar Satellite Corp., dated January 14, 2000. 47 C.F.R. � 100.21 Region 2 includes North and South America. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Wait Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969). Id. ITU Radio Regulations provide the following: With respect to � 4.3.3.1 of Article 4, an administration in Region 2 shall be considered as being affected if the overall equivalent protection margin(footnote omitted) corresponding to a test point of its entry in the Region 2 Plan, including the cumulative
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2418A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2418A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2418A1.txt
  • we find that it is fully consistent with the public interest and the underlying policy goals. Accordingly, we grant BellSouth's waiver request at this time. 5. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 201-205, and 218-220 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 154(j), 201-205, and 218-220, and Sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.106, and 32.27 of the Commissions rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.106, and 32.27, that the Petition for Waiver filed by BellSouth IS HEREBY GRANTED. Kenneth P. Moran Chief, Accounting Safeguards Division ATTACHMENT 1 1. In its waiver petition, BellSouth proposes to apply the term ``less than fully distributed cost'' to the following services that BellSouth receives from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2428A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2428A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2428A1.txt
  • if necessary, customer refunds, and upon the handling of customer complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplement. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by RCN Telecom Services of Illinois, Inc., f/k/a 21st Century Telecom Group, Inc., 21st Century Telecom Group, Inc., 21st Century Telecom of Illinois, Inc., OnePoint Communications Corp., and OnePoint Communications-Illinois, L.L.C. on August 30, 2000, and supplemented on October 17, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2430A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2430A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2430A1.txt
  • conditioned upon Time Warner's provision of customer notification and handling of customer complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the emergency waiver request filed by Time Warner Telecom Inc. on September 27, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters Associate Chief, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau Implementation of the Subscriber
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2444A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2444A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2444A1.txt
  • release of this Order, we shall seek emergency approval of the certification requirement from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Pub. L. 104-13. ordering clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i) and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, the Order is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline for implementation of non-recurring services under each funding commitment letter issued by the Administrator on or after April 4, 2000, IS EXTENDED to September 30, 2001. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline for implementation of non-recurring services
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2471A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2471A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2471A1.txt
  • (1977), citing Amendment of Part 74, Subpart K, of the Commission's Rules and Regulations Relative to Community Antenna Television Systems; and Inquiry Into the Development of Communications Technology and Services To Formulate Regulatory Policy and Rulemaking and/or Legislative Proposals (`` Second Report and Order''), 23 FCC 2d 816, 820-821 (1970), recon. denied, 39 FCC 2d 377 (1973). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see also 47 C.F.R. � 76.7(a)(1) (On petition by a cable television system operator ... or by any other interested person, the Commission may waive any provision of the rules relating to cable television systems...''). University of Arizona, 12 FCC Rcd at 11460 (quoting All Clear Cable TV (``All Clear''), 50 FCC 2d 693, 694 (1975)). 47 C.F.R. � 0.321.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2473A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2473A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2473A1.txt
  • of section 69.605(c) to similarly-sized carriers. We, therefore, find that Jordan-Soldier's request waiver of section 69.605(c) of the Commission rules should be granted. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Jordan-Soldier Valley Telephone Company and Alpine Communications, L.C. on June 15, 2000, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2492A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2492A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2492A1.txt
  • upon First Communications' provision of customer notification and handling of complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplements. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by First Communications, LLC, on September 28, 2000, and supplemented on October 26, 2000, and November 3, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters Associate Chief, Accounting Policy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2522A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2522A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2522A1.txt
  • that Bell Atlantic-NJ filed its designation application on December 18, 1997). United-NJ Petition at 4; Bell Atlantic-NJ Petition at 4. United-NJ Petition at 2 (designation effective Feb. 1, 1998). Bell Atlantic-NJ Petition at 1-2. United-NJ Petition at 4-5; Bell Atlantic-NJ Petition at 4. United-NJ Petition at 5; Bell Atlantic-NJ Petition at 4. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.201(a)(2). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. Denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972). Northeast Cellular Telephone Co., v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1159; Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. 47 C.F.R. � 54.201(a)(2). D.C. Petition at 1-2, 5; United-NJ Petition at 2, 4; Bell Atlantic-NJ Petition at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2528A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2528A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2528A1.txt
  • WorldCom, Inc. (WorldCom) oppose Verizon's, SBC's, and Qwest's waiver petitions, and the Association for Local Telecommunications Services (ALTS), Covad Communications Company (Covad), and DSLnet Communications, LLC (DSLnet) oppose SBC's and Qwest's waiver petitions. The United States Telephone Association (USTA) supports Verizon's, SBC's, and Qwest's waiver petitions, and BellSouth Corporation and BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. (BellSouth) support Verizon's petition. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. A rule may be waived where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). In addition, we may take into account considerations of hardship, equity, or more effective implementation of overall policy on an individual basis. WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2571A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2571A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2571A1.txt
  • Division), in which case the applicant must indicate in Exhibit F that it has filed a confidentiality request. Because the required information bears on applicants' qualifications, the FCC envisions that confidentiality requests will not be routinely granted. Waivers: Applicants requesting waiver of any rules must submit a statement of reasons sufficient to justify the waiver sought. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Attachment E AUCTION-SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR FCC REMITTANCE ADVICE (FCC FORM 159) Upfront Payments The following information supplements the standard instructions for FCC Form 159, and is provided to help ensure correct completion of FCC Form 159 for upfront payments for Auction No. 38. Applicants need to complete FCC Form 159 carefully, since: Mistakes may affect their bidding eligibility; and Lack
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2640A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2640A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2640A1.txt
  • make adjustments to their price cap indices to reflect cost changes resulting from rule waivers. We require Qwest to make such an adjustment. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Citizens Telecommunications Company of Idaho, Inc. and Qwest Corporation on July 11, 2000, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2641A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2641A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2641A1.txt
  • of licenses and lines from CTC and IWL to McLeodUSA, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Petition Supplement. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by McLeodUSA Telecommunications Services, Inc., on October 6, 2000, and supplemented on November 21, 2000, IS GRANTED subject to the conditions, and to the extent, indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters Associate Chief,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2649A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2649A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2649A1.txt
  • FM video services via the two earth stations addressed in this Order. We grant Loral's waiver request. Loral is correct that polarity-switching capability is necessary primarily to avoid interference with analog television transmissions. Because Loral will not use its two Kapolei, Hawaii, earth stations to operate with FM video carriers, Loral has demonstrated "particular facts" warranting a waiver under Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules. In addition, as a condition on this waiver, and as a condition on Loral's earth station licenses, Loral is precluded from using either of these earth stations to transmit or receive analog television signals from the Mabuhay satellite. In addition, on our own motion, we grant all ALSAT-designated earth stations a waiver of Section 25.210(a)(3) for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2662A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2662A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2662A1.txt
  • to their price cap indices to reflect cost changes resulting from rule waivers. We require the Verizon companies to make such an adjustment. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Citizens Telecommunications Company of Illinois, GTE North Incorporated and GTE South Incorporated on September 8, 2000, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2663A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2663A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2663A1.txt
  • comply with section 25.209(e) of the Commission's rules, which prohibits the imposition of limitations upon the operation, location, or design of any terrestrial station, any other earth station, or any space station beyond those limitations that would be expected to be imposed by an earth station with a conforming antenna. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 25.212(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 25.212(d), is DENIED. This Order is issued pursuant to section 0.261 of the Commission's rules on delegated authority, 47 C.F.R. � 0.261, and is effective upon release. Petitions for reconsideration under section 1.106 or applications for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2664A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2664A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2664A1.txt
  • of collisions here. Rather, the Commission will examine probability formulas, if necessary, in the context of its rulemaking. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.2 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.2, that the petition for declaratory ruling filed by Spacenet, Inc. on April 5, 2000, IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that current operators of VSAT networks ARE GRANTED a waiver of Section 25.134 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 25.134, for purposes of continuing to use any multiple access techniques being used at the time this Order becomes effective, pending a Commission rulemaking addressing the use of such techniques. This Order
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2699A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2699A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2699A1.txt
  • � 54.720(b). 47 C.F.R.� 1.7. Letter from Diana Larson, Northwestern School District 56-3, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., filed September 5, 2000. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Diana Larson, Northwestern School District 56-3, dated September 5, 2000. (Administrator's Decision on Appeal). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. -2699 -2699 � V W V W �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2735A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2735A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2735A1.txt
  • of this waiver is conditioned upon United-KUC's provision of customer notification, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplement. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91,0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by United-KUC, Inc. on September 19, 2000, and supplemented on December 1, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters Associate Chief, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau Implementation of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2757A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2757A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2757A1.txt
  • in this proceeding, which, pursuant to the public interest analysis articulated in the Commission's Foreign Participation Order, we must consider. On September 18, 2000, Eliska, Sonera Holding, DoJ, and the FBI filed a Joint Petition to Defer Action (``Petition to Defer'') in this proceeding. Despite the late-filed nature of the Petition to Defer, we exercise our authority pursuant to Section 1.3 of our Rules to waive the thirty-day filing deadline because of the importance of the issues raised. 18. The Petition to Defer noted concerns of the DoJ and FBI that granting the requested authority would present significant impediments to the ability of the U.S. government to preserve national security, enforce the laws, and protect the public safety. The Petition to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2789A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2789A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2789A1.txt
  • upon the provision of customer notification and the handling of complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplement. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by WORLDCOM, Inc. on October 16, 2000, and October 17, 2000, and supplemented on December 4, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters Associate Chief, Accounting Policy Division,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2812A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2812A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2812A1.txt
  • in the Alcatel Waiver Order, that Petitioners have shown good cause for granting the requested waivers. Applications to register these devices under Part 68 of our rules may be submitted with this waiver. ORDERING CLAUSES 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that the requests for waiver of Section 68.308(e)(1) ) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. � 68.308(e)(1) by Actiontec Electronics, Inc., Cisco Systems, Zoom Telephonics, GVC Corporation, Askey Computer Corp., Efficient Networks, Inc., Polycom, Inc., Ambit Microsystems Corporation, Linksys Group Incorporated, Conexant Systems, Inc., Dataquest Technology, Inc., MAC System Co., Ltd., Turbocomm Tech.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2816A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2816A1.txt
  • necessary to provide a seamless transition with no disruption of service to the transferred customers. 7. We find that Petitioners have demonstrated that a limited waiver of the authorization and verification rules is in the public interest because it will prevent consumers from temporarily losing service or paying significantly higher rates, and because Petitioners have agreed 7 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. 8 WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972). 9 Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). 10 WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1157. 11 WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1159; Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. 12 Waiver Petition at 1. 13 Waiver Petition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2827A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2827A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2827A1.txt
  • conditioned upon Primus' provision of customer notification and handling of complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplement. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Primus Telecommunications, Inc. on November 17, 2000, and supplemented on December 8, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters Associate Chief, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2839A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2839A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2839A1.txt
  • waiver is conditioned upon PaeTec's provision of customer notification and handling of complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by PaeTec Communications, Inc., on November 27, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters Associate Chief, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau Implementation of the Subscriber Carrier Selection
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2867A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2867A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2867A1.txt
  • by AT&T of customer notification and upon the handling of complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplements. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by AT&T Corporation on November 30, 2000, and supplemented on December 14, 2000, and on December 19, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters Associate Chief, Accounting Policy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2878A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2878A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2878A1.txt
  • information in its Form 312, however. 47 C.F.R. � 25.210(a)(3). 47 C.F.R. � 25.210(c). Space stations should be designed with the capability of being maintained in orbit within 0.05� of their assigned orbital location. 47 C.F.R. � 25.210(j)(1). Brasilsat A2 can be maintained in orbit within 0.1� of its assigned orbital location. Embratel Petition, App. A at A-4. See Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (WAIT Radio); Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1157; Dominion Video Satellite, Inc., Order and Authorization, 14 FCC Rcd 8182, 8185 (para. 5) (Int'l Bur., 1999) (Dominion
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2892A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2892A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2892A1.txt
  • conditioned upon Qwest's and the Acquiring Carriers' provision of customer notification, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplement. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91,0.291, 1.3, the joint waiver request filed by Qwest Corporation and All West Communications, Inc., All West World Connect, Carbon/Emery Telcom, Inc., Central Telcom Services, Central Utah Telephone, Inc., Emery Telcom, Hanksville Telcom, Inc., Manti Long Distance, Manti Telephone Company, Skyline Telecom, UBET Telecom, Inc., and Uintah Basin Long Distance on November 9,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2893A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2893A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2893A1.txt
  • make adjustments to their price cap indices to reflect cost changes resulting from rule waivers. We require Qwest to make such an adjustment. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Citizens Telecommunications Company of Colorado, Inc. and Qwest Corporation on August 7, 2000, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2899A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2899A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2899A1.txt
  • verification process, but it will also diminish the burden on Bell Atlantic and Lifeline customers without imposing any significant costs. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1, 4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 254, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Bell Atlantic-Pennsylvania on December 22, 1999 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order SHALL BE transmitted to the Universal Service Administrative Company. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Katherine L. Schroder Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Subsequent to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2900A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2900A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2900A1.txt
  • deadline to September 30, 2001. Applicants eligible for the extension, therefore, may extend their existing contracts for non-recurring services voluntarily until September 30, 2001, without having to comply with the Commission's competitive bidding process. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i) and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, this Order is ADOPTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Order, CC Docket No. 96-45, DA 00-2444 (Common Carrier Bur., rel. November 1, 2000) (November 2000 Extension Order). The Commission's rules require schools and libraries to implement
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2912A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2912A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2912A1.txt
  • of Michigan, Public Notice, DA 97-127 (Jan. 17, 1997); Revised Procedures for Bell Operating Company Applications Under Section 271 of the Communications Act, Public Notice, 13 FCC Rcd 17457 (Sept. 19, 1997); Updated Filing Requirements for Bell Operating Company Applications Under Section 271 of the Communications Act, Public Notice, DA-99-1994 (Sept. 28, 1999) (collectively ``271 Procedural Public Notices''). See section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Ameritech Michigan Order at 20575, para. 57; Application of Bell Atlantic New York for Authorization Under Section 271 of the Communications Act To Provide In-Region, InterLATA Service in the State of New York, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 3953, 3968, para. 34 (1999). See 271 Procedural Public Notices. PUBLIC NOTICE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2916A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2916A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2916A1.txt
  • & Order, CC Docket Nos. 92-237, 95-155, 12 FCC Rcd 23040 at paras. 84, 86 (1997) (``NANPA Order'') (``The board shall meet at least quarterly, and more frequently if the board members deem necessary. . . . Meetings . . . shall be held in Washington, D.C.''). Petition at 2. Petition at 1. Petition at 2. Id. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969). Id. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe, 401 U.S. 402, 416 (1971). FPC v. Texaco Inc., 377 U.S. 33, 39 (1964). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission DA 00-2916 �@��� @& �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� ��� � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-292A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-292A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-292A1.txt
  • Division), in which case the applicant must indicate in Exhibit E that it has filed a confidentiality request. Because the required information bears on applicants' qualifications, the FCC envisions that confidentiality requests will not be routinely granted. Waivers: Applicants requesting waiver of any rules must submit a statement of reasons sufficient to justify the waiver sought. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Attachment E AUCTION-SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR FCC REMITTANCE ADVICE (FCC FORM 159) Upfront Payments The following information supplements the standard instructions for FCC Form 159, and is provided to help ensure correct completion of FCC Form 159 for upfront payments for Auction No. 31. Applicants need to complete FCC Form 159 carefully, since: Mistakes may affect their bidding eligibility; and Lack
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-318A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-318A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-318A1.txt
  • C and F block spectrum. Comments submitted in response to those Public Notices may, to the extent relevant, be incorporated by reference in comments submitted in response to this Public Notice. Commenters should address the sufficiency of the showings made by AT&T Wireless, BellSouth and Bell Atlantic in light of the requirements of 47 U.S.C. � 160, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 and any other public interest considerations. All comments should reference the DA number of this Public Notice (DA 00-318). Comments should be filed with the Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, TW B204, 445 12th St. S.W. Washington, DC 20554. Comments also should be provided to Steven Weingarten, Chief, Commercial Wireless Division, Room # 4-C224, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-397A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-397A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-397A1.txt
  • U.S.C. � 309(j)(3)(E)(ii). The bidding rules for the auction have been announced. Auction of Licenses in the 747-762 and 777-792 MHz Bands, Auction Notice and Filing Requirements for 12 Licenses in the 700 MHz Bands, Auction Scheduled for May 10, 2000, DA 00-292 (Feb. 18, 2000). See 47 C.F.R. � 0.331 (authority delegated to Wireless Telecommunications Bureau); 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (suspension, amendment, and waiver of Commission Rules). See also 5 U.S.C. � 553(b)(B). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202 / 418-2830 TTY 202 / 418-2555 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov � � � � � +D�� +D`� +D`� �����PNG > �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o�
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-420A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-420A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-420A1.txt
  • N.E. Colorado Cellular, Inc., 12 FCC Rcd. 1185, � 18 (rel. Feb. 3, 1997). See 47 C.F.R. �� 22.911(d), 22.912(a). See Bachow's Reply to Answer, Exhibit M (filed Sep. 14, 1998). Convention on the Territorial Sea and the Contiguous Zone, Apr. 29, 1958, art. 10(1), 15 U.S.T. 1606, 516 U.N.T.S. 205. 47 C.F.R. �� 22.911(d), 22.912(a). See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 22.119(a). See Halprin v. MCI Telecommunications Corp., 13 FCC Rcd. 22568, � 31 (rel. Nov. 10, 1998); see also 47 U.S.C. �� 208, 503((b); see also 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(e). Federal Communications Commission DA 00-420 Federal Communications Commission DA 00-420 v w z { � � " � x y x y � �@��� �@��� iI�G���
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-422A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-422A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-422A1.txt
  • section 214 authorization). Telmex USA Notification. Public Notice, List of Foreign Telecommunications Carriers that are Presumed to Possess Market Power in Foreign Telecommunications Markets, DA 99-809 (rel. June 18, 1999). Telmex USA Notification; 47 C.F.R. �63.10 (a)(4). The notification appeared on a Public Notice released Jan. 31, 2000. In the Public Notice, the International Bureau granted, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. �1.3, Telmex USA's request for waiver of the sixty-day prior notification period in section 63.11(a) of the Commission's rules by reducing the notification period to forty-five days. In the Matter of Telmex International, Inc.: Notification of Foreign Affiliation Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. Section 63.11(a), Response of Telmex International, Inc. (filed Feb. 22, 2000) (Telmex Response). Rules and Policies on Foreign Participation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-442A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-442A1.txt
  • January 1, 1995. Opposition at 2. Id. at 4. Sagir filed a complaint on June 8, 1995, against NECC alleging an improper extension into its CGSA. The Commission granted Sagir's request for relief and ordered NECC to remove the unauthorized extension. See, Sagir, Inc. v N.E. Colorado Cellular, Inc. 13 FCC Rcd 23762(1998). 47 C.F.R. � 22.912(a). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; Wait Radio v FCC, 418 F.2d1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972). Id (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 00-442 Federal Communications Commission DA 00-442 ~  � @& � � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-556A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-556A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-556A1.txt
  • won at auction, then the Commission has stated that it will assess an initial default deposit of between three percent and twenty percent of the defaulted bid amount. Once the license(s) have been auctioned the total default payment will be calculated and the Commission will either assess the final balance or refund any amounts due to the defaulting bidder. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules permits the Commission to waive its rules if good cause is demonstrated. Section 1.925 of the Commission's Rules provides that a waiver of the Commission's rules will not be permitted except upon an affirmative showing that either: (a) the underlying purpose of the rule will not be served in a particular situation and that granting the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-660A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-660A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-660A1.txt
  • for ATC communications (namely, 117.975 MHz to 136.975 MHz). The listed frequencies are based on 25 kHz spacing. There is no provision in the Commission's Rules for operating on 8.33-kHz spaced channels as envisioned by the ICAO channel plan. Accordingly, type acceptance of dual spacing transceivers may not be obtained absent a waiver of Section 87.173(b). III. DISCUSSION . Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules permits waiver of any rule provision for good cause shown. We find that the waiver requested by TCC is warranted. We note, as an initial matter, that we have granted similar waivers regarding dual spacing transceivers. As noted in the Garmin Order, two industry standard setting organizations, RTCA, Inc. (RTCA) and Aeronautical Radio, Inc. (ARINC), have
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-702A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-702A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-702A1.txt
  • coordination issues with other countries); MCI Order, 2 FCC Rcd at 234 (paras. 7-9) (extending the milestones for one of MCI's two licenses because a series of launch failures that disrupted the industry at that time, including the Challenger disaster, may have played a part in MCI's failure to begin construction of that satellite). Columbia Request at 6-7. See Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (WAIT Radio); Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. See also Comsat Corporation, Petition for Partial Relief from the Current Regulatory Treatment of Comsat World Systems' Switched
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-760A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-760A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-760A1.txt
  • Waiver of the Eligibility Requirements of 47 C.F.R. Section 24.709 for the PCS C and F Block Auction and for Expedited Action, filed January 21, 2000 (seeking expedited consideration of request to waive eligibility rules in Auction No. 35 to facilitate their preparation for that auction). See 47 C.F.R. � 0.331 (authority delegated to Wireless Telecommunications Bureau); 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (suspension, amendment, and waiver of Commission Rules). See also 5 U.S.C. � 553(b)(B). We note also that there are pending petitions for reconsideration on spectrum cap issues. See "Petitions for Reconsideration and Clarification of Action in Rulemaking Proceedings," Public Notice, Report No. 2387 (rel. February 8, 2000). See "Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Seeks Comment on SBC Communications Inc.'s Request for Waiver
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-781A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-781A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-781A1.txt
  • Division), in which case the applicant must indicate in Exhibit E that it has filed a confidentiality request. Because the required information bears on applicants' qualifications, the FCC envisions that confidentiality requests will not be routinely granted. Waivers: Applicants requesting waiver of any rules must submit a statement of reasons sufficient to justify the waiver sought. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Attachment E AUCTION-SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR FCC REMITTANCE ADVICE (FCC FORM 159) Upfront Payments The following information supplements the standard instructions for FCC Form 159, and is provided to help ensure correct completion of FCC Form 159 for upfront payments for Auction No. 33. Applicants need to complete FCC Form 159 carefully, since: Mistakes may affect their bidding eligibility; and Lack
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-828A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-828A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-828A1.txt
  • the Greenmail Waiver Notice, and permitting the withdrawal is in the public interest. Accordingly, we will approve Binghamton's request to withdraw the above-captioned application. We therefore will dismiss PA4's petition to deny as moot. 4. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and sections 0.331 and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.331, 1.3, the request to withdraw the above-captioned application filed by Binghamton Celltelco Cellular One on July 26, 1999 IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C � 154(i), and sections 0.331 and 1.939(g) of the Commission's rules, 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-909A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-909A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-909A1.txt
  • control that preclude it from launching QuickBird-2 by April 2001. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Application File No. SAT-MOD-19990720-00074 IS GRANTED IN PART, and EarthWatch, Inc., IS AUTHORIZED to operate the satellite QuickBird-1 at an orbital inclination of 66� and the satellite QuickBird-2 at an orbital inclination of 98�. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, EarthWatch IS GRANTED a waiver of Section 25.117(e)(1) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 25.117(e)(1), for purposes of rescheduling the construction completion and launch milestones of QuickBird-2 to December 2000 and April 2001. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless extended by the Commission for good cause shown, this authorization shall become
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-100A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-100A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-100A1.txt
  • (1977), citing Amendment of Part 74, Subpart K, of the Commission's Rules and Regulations Relative to Community Antenna Television Systems; and Inquiry Into the Development of Communications Technology and Services To Formulate Regulatory Policy and Rulemaking and/or Legislative Proposals (`` Second Report and Order''), 23 FCC 2d 816, 820-821 (1970), recon. denied, 39 FCC 2d 377 (1973). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see also 47 C.F.R. � 76.7(a)(1) (On petition by a cable television system operator ... or by any other interested person, the Commission may waive any provision of the rules relating to cable television systems...''). University of Arizona, 12 FCC Rcd at 11460 (quoting All Clear Cable TV (``All Clear''), 50 FCC 2d 693, 694 (1975)). 47 C.F.R. � 0.321.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-101A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-101A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-101A1.txt
  • the statements of the Alaska Commission, we conclude that the Petitioners have demonstrated that grant of this waiver request serves the public interest. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by ATEAC, Inc., Alaska Telephone Company, Arctic Slope Telephone Association Cooperative, Inc., Interior Telephone Company, Inc., Mukluk Telephone Company, Inc., and United-KUC, Inc., on September 22, 2000, IS GRANTED, as described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1039A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1039A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1039A1.txt
  • in the Alcatel Waiver Order, that Petitioners have shown good cause for granting the requested waivers. Applications to register these devices under Part 68 of our rules may be submitted with this waiver. ORDERING CLAUSES 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that the requests for waiver of Section 68.308(e)(1) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. � 68.308(e)(1) by BroadMax Technology Limited, Ambit Microsystems Corporation, Delta Networks, Inc., Efficient Networks, Inc., Comtrend Corporation, Allied Data Technologies, 3Com Corporation, Eicon Networks, and Askey Computer Corp. ARE GRANTED to the extent stated herein. 8. IT IS FURTHER
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1045A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1045A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1045A1.txt
  • upon the provision of customer notification and the handling of complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplement. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by ComTech21, LLC on March 22, 2001, and supplemented on April 20, 2001, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters Associate Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Implementation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1046A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1046A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1046A1.txt
  • is conditioned upon the provision of customer notification and the handling of complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the emergency waiver request filed by Manhattan Telecommunications Corporation d/b/a Metropolitan Telecommunications a/k/a MetTel on April 16, 2001 IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters Associate Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1070A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1070A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1070A1.txt
  • excluded from the ratebase. Therefore, we conclude that PRTC has failed to substantiate its claim and PRTC's petition for clarification must be denied. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 201-205, and 218-220 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 154(j), 201- 205, and 218-220, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.106, 32.18 and 32.27 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.106, 32.18 and 32.27, that the Petition for Reconsideration or Clarification filed by Puerto Rico Telephone Company is HEREBY DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Puerto Rico Telephone Company, Inc., Petition for Waiver of Section 32.27 of the Commission's Rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1072A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1072A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1072A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X X X X 6 6 X X X X � DA 01-1072 April 25, 2001 IN THE MATTER OF EXTENSION OF THE FIVE-YEAR BUILD-OUT PERIOD FOR BTA AUTHORIZATION HOLDERS IN THE MULTIPOINT DISTRIBUTION SERVICE Comment Date: May 9, 2001 Reply Comment Date: May 16, 2001 By the Chief, Mass Media Bureau: 1. Pursuant to Sections 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the Mass Media Bureau (``Bureau''), on its own motion, hereby seeks comment on a proposal to extend the current five-year build-out requirement imposed upon Basic Trading Area (``BTA'') authorization holders in the Multipoint Distribution Service (``MDS'') by two years. In March 1996, the Commission completed its auction of the remaining unused MDS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.txt
  • PRELIMINARY VIEW: Support an allocation permitting the use of the band 108-117.975 MHz for the transmission of ICAO standard GNSS augmentation systems. Ensure conformity with ITU-R Recommendation IS.1009 regarding compatibility with the FM broadcast services in the band 87.5-108 MHz. Doc. IWG-6/013(Rev.1) Author: John Lyons 16 April 2001 john.lyons@motorola.com Informal Working Group 6 Preliminary Views on WRC-03 WRC-2003 Agenda Item 1.3 to consider identification of globally/regionally harmonized bands, to the extent practicable, for the implementation of future advanced solutions to meet the needs of public protection agencies, including those dealing with emergency situations and disaster relief, and to make regulatory provisions, as necessary, taking into account Resolution 645/[GT PLEN-2/5] (WRC-2000) Issue: Pursuant to Resolution 1156 of WRC-2000, modify Article S5 of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1119A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1119A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1119A1.txt
  • Homer is subject to the funding priorities set forth in Section 54.507(c). We conclude that the particular facts of this case do rise to the level of special circumstances required for a deviation from the general rule. We, therefore, find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Homer Community Consolidated School District 33C, Lockport, Illinois, on July 6, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Letter from John Lavelle, Homer Community Consolidated School District 33C, Lockport, Illinois, to the Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1120A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1120A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1120A1.txt
  • applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, ICS fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We, therefore, find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Immaculate Conception School, Irvington-on-Hudson, New York, on July 24, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Louise Frangella, Immaculate Conception School, Irvington-on-Hudson, to Federal Communications Commission, filed on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1132A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1132A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1132A1.txt
  • is conditioned upon the provision of customer notification and the handling of complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Choice One Communications of New York, Inc. on April 26, 2001, and supplemented on April 27, 2001 and May 3, 2001, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1154A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1154A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1154A1.txt
  • Comment Date: June 11, 2001 In its Fourth Order on Reconsideration, in the Universal Service proceeding, the Commission adopted a formula that limits the amount of corporate operations expense that a carrier can include in its high cost loop support mechanisms for the Universal Service Fund (USF). On April 30, 2001, Oklahoma Telephone & Telegraph, Inc. (OT&T), pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, filed a letter seeking a waiver of the corporate operations expense limitation in section 36.621(a)(4)(ii) of the Commission's rules to allow it to include its actual corporate operations expense in the calculation of its federal USF expense adjustment.2 OT&T contends that granting its request will serve the public interest by providing it with adequate cost recovery,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1160A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1160A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1160A1.txt
  • reasons as in that order, that Petitioners have shown good cause for granting the requested waivers. Applications to register these devices under Part 68 of our rules may be submitted with this waiver. ORDERING CLAUSES 9. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that the requests for waiver of Section 68.312(i) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 68.312(i), by Uniden Engineering Services, Kyushu Matsushita Electric Co., Ltd., RadioShack Corporation, and ShenZhen Huaneng Communication Co. LTD. ARE GRANTED to the extent stated herein. 10. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitions for waiver ARE GRANTED
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1161A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1161A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1161A1.txt
  • �� 6-10. Zimsky, 9 FCC Rcd. 3239. Id., at 3241, � 23; Knight, 982 F.3d at 1581 (citing Sprague, 307 U.S. at 166-67; Alyeska Pipeline Serv. Co. v. Wilderness Soc'y., 421 U.S. at 257-8; Boeing, 444 U.S. at 478) (emphasis added). Zimsky, 9 FCC Rcd. 3239; Common Fund Order, 15 FCC Rcd. at 20437, � 10. Id. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules provides the Commission with the authority to grant waivers ``if good cause therefor is shown.''); 47 C.F.R. � 1.925 (``The Commission may grant a waiver request if: (i) the underlying purpose of the rule(s) would not be served or would be frustrated by application to the instant case, and that a grant of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-119A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-119A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-119A1.txt
  • Division), in which case the applicant must indicate in Exhibit F that it has filed a confidentiality request. Because the required information bears on applicants' qualifications, the FCC envisions that confidentiality requests will not be routinely granted. Waivers: Applicants requesting waiver of any rules must submit a statement of reasons sufficient to justify the waiver sought. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. X. ATTACHMENT E AUCTION-SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR FCC REMITTANCE ADVICE (FCC FORM 159) Upfront Payments The following information supplements the standard instructions for FCC Form 159, and is provided to help ensure correct completion of FCC Form 159 for upfront payments for Auction No. 37. Applicants need to complete FCC Form 159 carefully, since: Mistakes may affect their bidding eligibility; and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1217A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1217A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1217A1.txt
  • requirement sunsets 48 months after release of the Bell Atlantic/NYNEX Merger Order. Letter from Gordon Evans, Vice President, Federal Regulatory, Verizon, to Dorothy Attwood, Chief, Common Carrier Bureau (Mar. 8, 2001). Common Carrier Bureau Seeks Comment on Verizon's Request to Eliminate Reporting Requirements Under the Bell Atlantic/NYNEX Merger Order, Public Notice, DA 01-810 (Mar. 30, 2001). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Federal Communications Commission DA 01-1217 Federal Communications Commission DA 01-1217 � " А$� А$� А$� - (c) � Ѐ �$�� - (c) � �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �`� �0�
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-121A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-121A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-121A1.txt
  • NOTICE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION News media information 202/418-0500 445 12th St. SW Fax-On-Demand 202/418-2830 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov DA 01-121 Released: January 18, 2001 WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU SEEKS COMMENT ON FCI 900, INC.'S EXPEDITED REQUEST FOR 3-YEAR EXTENSION OF 900 MHZ BAND CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS Comment Date: February 1, 2001 Reply Comment Date: February 8, 2001 Pursuant to Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 1.925, the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (Bureau) hereby seeks comment on the Request for Expedited Waiver filed by FCI 900, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Nextel Communications, Inc. (collectively, Nextel). Nextel requests waiver of Section 90.665(c) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 90.665(c), to extend the 5-year construction period
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-122A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-122A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-122A1.txt
  • media information 202/418-0500 445 12th St. SW Fax-On-Demand 202/418-2830 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov DA 01-122 Released: January 18, 2001 WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU SEEKS COMMENT ON NEOWORLD LICENSE HOLDINGS, INC.'S REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF 900 MHZ BAND CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS AND PETITION FOR DECLARATORY RULING Comment Date: February 1, 2001 Reply Comment Date: February 8, 2001 Pursuant to Sections 1.2, 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.2, 1.3 and 1.925, the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (Bureau) hereby seeks comment on the Request for Waiver and Petition for Declaratory Ruling filed by Neoworld License Holdings, Inc. (Neoworld), an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Neoworld License Holdings, LLC, on January 10, 2001. Neoworld requests waiver of Section 90.665(c) of the Commission's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1243A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1243A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1243A1.txt
  • in the Alcatel Waiver Order, that Petitioners have shown good cause for granting the requested waivers. Applications to register these devices under Part 68 of our rules may be submitted with this waiver. ORDERING CLAUSES 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that the requests for waiver of Section 68.308(e)(1) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. � 68.308(e)(1) by Lucent Technologies, XAVi Technologies Corporation, Delta Networks Inc., Turbocomm Tech. Inc., Archtek Telecom Corporation, TelGen Corporation, Intel Corporation, Kye Systems Corporation, Tailyn Communication Company, LTD., , Intel Denmark ApS, Occam Networks, Inc., Telmax Communications Corporation, Kinpo
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1247A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1247A1.txt
  • N MD KNDN381 A 0000400596 MOTIENT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY 03/13/2001 00810.83750 PA MD KNDN381 077-10-31.9 W 0000400596 MOTIENT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANYCARLISLE 03/13/2001 00855.83750 40-13-27.3 N PA MD KNDN381 076-48-12.9 W 0000400596 MOTIENT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANYHARRISBURG 03/13/2001 00855.83750 40-14-47.3 N PA MD KNDN381 076-39-55.9 W 0000400596 MOTIENT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANYHERSHEY 03/13/2001 00855.83750 40-15-33.3 N PA MD KNDN381 076-59-23.6 W 0000400596 MOTIENT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANYMECHANICSBURG 03/13/2001 00855.83750 40-13-01.3 N NE A 0000368584 Motient Communications Company 01/29/2001 00810.06250 PA NE 080-01-07.2 W 0000368584 Motient Communications Company PITTSBURGH 01/29/2001 00855.06250 40-29-27.2 N Page 41 GB - Business, 806-821/851-866 MHz, Conventional State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NE A 0000368650 Motient Communications Company 01/29/2001 00810.83750 PA NE 076-52-07.9 W 0000368650
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1251A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1251A1.txt
  • actions of those employees to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely and proper requests for discounts on its behalf. Here, Danbury fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Danbury Public Schools, Danbury, Connecticut, on July 25, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Melanie C. Schroeder, Danbury Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed on July
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1252A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1252A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1252A1.txt
  • applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Dummerston fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Dummerston Elementary School, Dummerston, Vermont, on August 24, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Betsy Whittaker, Dummerston Elementary School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed on August 24,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1284A1.txt
  • of the construction commencement milestone, and requested us to grant a transfer of control application. We placed the petition on public notice. Pacific Century Group, Inc. (PCG) and TRW, Inc. (TRW) filed oppositions to NetSat 28's petition, and NetSat 28 filed a reply. NetSat 28 asserts that it has provided "good cause" for a waiver within the meaning of Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules. PCG and TRW assert that we cannot grant a waiver of a license condition after the license has been declared null and void. For the reasons discussed below, we conclude that NetSat 28 has shown good cause for a waiver of its construction commencement milestone. Accordingly, on our own motion, we reinstate NetSat 28's license under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1286A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1286A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1286A1.txt
  • to incorporate ISLs into its satellite system. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that issued pursuant to Section 0.261 of the Commission's rule on delegations of authority, 47 C.F.R. � 0.261, the request to defer milestones filed by GE American Communications, Inc. on November 18, 1997, IS GRANTED to the extent set forth herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commissions Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, Section 25.117(e)(1) of the Commission's rules regarding the remaining construction and launch milestones, 47 C.F.R. 25.117(e)(1) IS WAIVED, and the milestones imposed on GE American Communications, Inc. in its original Authorization Order, 12 FCC Rcd 6475 (1997) are extended as follows: Complete Construction Launch and Operate Satellite licensed at 105� W.L. May
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-129A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-129A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-129A1.txt
  • cap regulation no later than one year after acquiring the price cap access lines from Valor. Discussion For the reasons discussed below, we find that good cause exists for us to waive section 61.41(c)(2) of the Commission's rules, and that it would be in the public interest to grant Mescalero's waiver request. As discussed previously, the courts have interpreted section 1.3 of the Commission's rules to require a petitioner seeking a waiver of a Commission rule to demonstrate that special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, and that such a deviation will serve the public interest. Because Mescalero is significantly smaller than any of the carriers subject to mandatory price cap regulation, we find that special circumstances support a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-12A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-12A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-12A1.txt
  • 4-A435), in which case the applicant must indicate in Exhibit F that it has filed a confidentiality request. Because the required information bears on applicants' qualifications, the FCC envisions that confidentiality requests will not be routinely granted. Waivers: Applicants requesting waiver of any rules must submit a statement of reasons sufficient to justify the waiver sought. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Certifications: Applicants should carefully read the list of certifications on the FCC Form 175. These certifications help to ensure a fair and competitive auction and require, among other things, disclosure to the Commission of certain information on applicant ownership and agreements or arrangements concerning the auction. Submission of an FCC Form 175 application constitutes a representation by the certifying official
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1327A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1327A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1327A1.txt
  • interest would be served by such a waiver. Accordingly, we grant South Slope's request for waiver of section 69.605(c) of the Commission's rules. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by South Slope Cooperative Telephone Company, Amana Colonies Telephone Company, d/b/a HickoryTech and Heartland Telecommunications Company of Iowa on December 13, 2000, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1333A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1333A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1333A1.txt
  • knowledge and presence. Based on these representations, we conclude that Madison has demonstrated that grant of this waiver request serves the public interest. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Madison Telephone Company and Gallatin River Communications, LLC on February 23, 2001, IS GRANTED, as described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Katherine L. Schroder Chief, Accounting Policy Division Madison Telephone Company and Gallatin River Communications,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1353A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1353A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1353A1.txt
  • Chief, Common Carrier Bureau: 1. In this Order, we grant the petition for waiver filed by Puerto Rico Telephone Company, Inc. (PRTC) and extend to July 1, 2002, the deadline by which PRTC is required under the Commission's rules to convert to price cap regulation. 2. PRTC is the incumbent local exchange carrier serving Puerto Rico. It serves more than 1.3 million access lines and provides local exchange, exchange access, intra-island services, and Internet access. PRTC is regulated in the interstate jurisdiction as a rate-of-return carrier. On February 12, 1999, the Commission approved an application to transfer control of PRTC to GTE Holdings (Puerto Rico) LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of GTE International Telecommunications Incorporated that is affiliated with price cap carriers
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1378A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1378A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1378A1.txt
  • interest. Therefore, we waive for one year the requirement of section 69.602 that NECA hold annual elections for its Board of Directors. . Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), and 201-205 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), (j), and 201-205, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 69.602 filed by the National Exchange Carriers Association, IS GRANTED to the extent herein discussed. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey, Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Biennial Regulatory Review 2000 Staff Report, National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., Petition for Interim Waiver,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1407A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1407A1.txt
  • able to charge the higher of the target rate and the ATS rate. Again, our rules are silent as to the situation here, where the contracts to purchase were in place as of April 1, 2000, but will not be completed by June 30, 2001. Moreover, even if waivers are necessary, petitioners have demonstrated good cause as required under section 1.3 of the Commission's rules. Petitioners have demonstrated that special circumstances exist as to why they have been unable to complete the sale of the exchanges. It would be inequitable to hold petitioners responsible for the completion of regulatory approvals, as these matters are not entirely within their control. In addition, with respect to the Qwest properties, the fact that the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1408A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1408A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1408A1.txt
  • one additional year. In so doing, we extend the deadline to July 1, 2002, by which ALLTEL/Aliant is required to convert the exchanges it acquired from Aliant to rate-of-return regulation. 8. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i)-(j), and 201 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i)-(j), and 201, and sections 0.291, 0.91 and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.291, 0.91 and 1.3, that section 61.41 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 61.41, SHALL BE WAIVED to the extent necessary to permit ALLTEL/Aliant to file a price cap annual access tariff that will be effective July 3, 2001. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dorothy T. Attwood Chief, Common Carrier Bureau For purposes of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1421A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1421A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1421A1.txt
  • carriers seeking to terminate traffic in its region. As discussed above, that was not the case with either BC Tel or Quebec Tel at the time the Commission found them to be non-dominant. Therefore, the reasons for non-dominant treatment of GTE Hawaii's affiliates do not apply to Bell Canada. 13. Waiver Request. Alternatively, Bell Canada argues that pursuant to section 1.3 of our rules the Commission should waive the contract filing requirements of section 43.51 of the rules for U.S. carrier arrangements with Bell Canada. Under section 1.3 of our rules, the Commission may waive a requirement "for good cause shown." The general purpose of the filing requirement for arrangements with foreign carriers possessing market power is the protection of U.S.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1425A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1425A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1425A1.txt
  • requirement sunsets 48 months after release of the Bell Atlantic/NYNEX Merger Order. Letter from Gordon Evans, Vice President, Federal Regulatory, Verizon, to Dorothy Attwood, Chief, Common Carrier Bureau (Mar. 8, 2001). Common Carrier Bureau Seeks Comment on Verizon's Request to Eliminate Reporting Requirements Under the Bell Atlantic/NYNEX Merger Order, Public Notice, DA 01-810 (Mar. 30, 2001). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See Letter from Dee May, Executive Director, Federal Regulatory, Verizon, to Magalie Roman Salas, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, (May 21, 2001) (describing, inter alia, differences in order types between the Verizon East and Verizon West regions). Federal Communications Commission DA 01-1425 Federal Communications Commission DA 01-1425 ( ) * , / 0 � � � � А$� ' ( .
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1426A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1426A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1426A1.txt
  • summary Order of the Commission on 30 days notice and does not confer any permanent location to the use of the orbit or spectrum. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Columbia Communications Corporation is obliged to comply with the applicable laws, regulations, rules, and licensing procedures in those countries it proposes to serve. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, Columbia Communications Corporation IS GRANTED a waiver of Sections 25.210(c), (i), and (j) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 25.210(c), (i), (j), for purposes of provision of Ku-band service to the Southern Hemisphere from the 37.7� orbit location. This Order is issued pursuant to Section 0.261 of the Commission's rules on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1429A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1429A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1429A1.txt
  • a single petition for waiver, without time to solicit comment from affected parties. Therefore, we take a cautious approach that will allow the affected carriers to recover their universal service contributions only through the same type of end-user charges that are already paid by the vast majority of telephone consumers. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1.3, 0.91, and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 0.91, and 0.291, that sections 69.3(a) and 69.4(d)(2) ARE WAIVED TO THE EXTENT INDICATED HEREIN. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that non-price cap local exchange carriers electing to take advantage of the waivers granted herein shall cite the ``DA'' number of this Order as the authority for the filing. FEDERAL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1431A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1431A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1431A1.txt
  • the provision of customer notification and the handling of complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplementary Filing. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Pacific Lightnet, Inc., on May 22, 2001, and supplemented on June 11, 2001, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters Associate Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1440A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1440A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1440A1.txt
  • that the Commission review, clarify, modify and/or abolish the MDS BTA build-out requirement, the Commission expects to address these issues in an upcoming rulemaking. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE 10. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, That pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), Section 5(e) of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. � 5(e), and Sections 1.3, and 21.19 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 21.19, the five-year build-out requirement set forth in 47 C.F.R. � 21.930 IS WAIVED and EXTENDED, to the extent indicated above. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Roy J. Stewart Chief, Mass Media Bureau BTAs are the geographic areas governing the system-wide authorization of MDS station licenses and are based on material copyrighted
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1450A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1450A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1450A1.txt
  • the provision of customer notification and the handling of complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplemental Filing. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by SWBT, Inc., on May 22, 2001, and supplemented on June 11, 2001, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters Associate Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Implementation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-146A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-146A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-146A1.txt
  • 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). 47 C.F.R.� 1.7. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See e.g. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (``Waiver is [] appropriate if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, and such deviation would better serve the public interest than strict adherence to the general rule.''); 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. -146 -xxxx � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1504A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1504A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1504A1.txt
  • window. Instead, the burden of ensuring that complete and accurate information is provided on the correct forms properly rests with applicants themselves. We therefore conclude that, under these circumstances, Fair Lawn has failed to make a showing warranting relief and, therefore, its Request for Waiver must be denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed June 22, 2000 by Fair Lawn Board of Education, Fair Lawn, New Jersey IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey, Deputy Chief Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Bruce Watson, Fair Lawn Board of Education, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1505A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1505A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1505A1.txt
  • the effective date of the freeze, for both category relationships and allocation factors, remains July 1, 2001. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1-2, 4, 201-205, 215, 218, 220, 229, 254 and 410 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 152, 154, 201-205, 215, 218, 220, 229, 254, and 410, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 U.S.C. � 1.3, that the Joint Petition for Expedited Limited Waiver filed on June 15, 2001 by the National Exchange Carrier Association, the United States Telecommunications Association, the National Telephone Cooperative Association, the National Rural Telecom Association, and the Organization for the Promotion and Advancement of Small Telecommunications Companies IS GRANTED to the extent provided
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1507A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1507A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1507A1.txt
  • � 54.720(b). 47 C.F.R.� 1.7. Letter from Rabbi Michel Gurkov, Chabad Hebrew School, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., filed March 28, 2001. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Rabbi Michel Gurkov, Chabad Hebrew School, dated March 30, 2001 (Administrator's Decision on Appeal). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See FCDL Re-Mail Advisory Cover Sheet Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Rabbi Michel Gurkov, Chabad Center Hebrew School, dated November 8, 2000. -1507 -1507 � � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1536A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1536A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1536A1.txt
  • to their price cap indices to reflect cost changes resulting from rule waivers. We require Qwest and Citizens to make such an adjustment. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Citizens Utilities Rural Company, Inc. and Qwest Corporation on December 20, 2000, IS DENIED AS FILED AND GRANTED AS DESCRIBED HEREIN. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1542A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1542A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1542A1.txt
  • 65 FR 57291 (Sept. 22, 2000) (establishing the same effective date for the remaining rules adopted in that Order). Collocation Reconsideration Order at � 36. Deployment of Wireline Services Offering Advanced Telecommunications Capability, CC Docket No. 98-147, Memorandum Opinion and Order, DA 00-2528 (Com. Car. Bur. rel. Nov. 7, 2000) (``Collocation Waiver Order''). 47 U.S.C. � 251(c)(6). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. A rule may be waived where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). In addition, we may take into account considerations of hardship, equity, or more effective implementation of overall policy on an individual basis. WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1592A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1592A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1592A1.txt
  • on the FCC Form 175, will assist the Commission in monitoring the participation of these ``designated entities'' in its auctions. Exhibit F -- Miscellaneous Information: Applicants wishing to submit additional information should include it in Exhibit F. Waivers: Applicants requesting waiver of any rules must submit a statement of reasons sufficient to justify the waiver sought. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925. Certifications: Applicants should carefully read the list of certifications on the FCC Form 175. These certifications help to ensure a fair and competitive auction and require, among other things, disclosure to the Commission of certain information on applicant ownership and agreements or arrangements concerning the auction. Submission of an FCC Form 175 application constitutes a representation by the certifying
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1606A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1606A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1606A1.txt
  • in the Alcatel Waiver Order, that Petitioners have shown good cause for granting the requested waivers. Applications to register these devices under Part 68 of our rules may be submitted with this waiver. ORDERING CLAUSES 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that the requests for waiver of Section 68.308(e)(1) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. � 68.308(e)(1) by Korea One Telecommunication Technology, Inc., DirecTV Broadband, Inc., GoDot Technology Inc., Arescom Inc., Delta Networks Inc., Actiontec Electronics, Inc., and Celsian Technologies Inc. ARE GRANTED to the extent stated herein. 8. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1609A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1609A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1609A1.txt
  • Notice, 13 FCC Rcd 17457 (Sept. 19, 1997); Updated Filing Requirements for Bell Operating Company Applications Under Section 271 of the Communications Act, Public Notice, DA-99-1994 (Sept. 28, 1999); Updated Filing Requirements for Bell Operating Company Applications Under Section 271 of the Communications Act, Public Notice, DA 01-734 (CCB rel. Mar. 23, 2001) (collectively ``271 Procedural Public Notices''). See section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Ameritech Michigan Order at 20575, para. 57; Application of Bell Atlantic New York For Authorization Under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-Region, InterLATA Service in the State of New York, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 3953, 3968, para. 34 (1999). +D`� +D�� A B a b c
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1673A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1673A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1673A1.txt
  • requirement sunsets 48 months after release of the Bell Atlantic/NYNEX Merger Order. Letter from Gordon Evans, Vice President, Federal Regulatory, Verizon, to Dorothy Attwood, Chief, Common Carrier Bureau (Mar. 8, 2001). Common Carrier Bureau Seeks Comment on Verizon's Request to Eliminate Reporting Requirements Under the Bell Atlantic/NYNEX Merger Order, Public Notice, DA 01-810 (Mar. 30, 2001). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Federal Communications Commission DA 01-1673 Federal Communications Commission DA 01-1673  � � � � А$� ~  ~  Ѐ �$�� �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �`� �0�
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-167A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-167A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-167A1.txt
  • in the Alcatel Waiver Order, that Petitioners have shown good cause for granting the requested waivers. Applications to register these devices under Part 68 of our rules may be submitted with this waiver. ORDERING CLAUSES 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that the requests for waiver of Section 68.308(e)(1) ) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. � 68.308(e)(1) by NEC America Inc., Infinilink Corporation, Virtual Access (UK) Ltd., D-Link Corporation, Xavi Technologies Corporation, mPhase Technologies, Inc., 3Com Corporation, Dataquest Technology Inc., Eicon Networks, Telocity, Inc., MAC System Co., Ltd., Tecom Co., Ltd., and ADC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1684A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1684A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1684A1.txt
  • Assistance for Authority to Construct, Launch and Operate a Non-Voice, Non-Geostationary Mobile Satellite System, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 1358 (1995) aff'd 12 FCC Rcd 13995 (1997) (application for additional frequencies treated as ineligible for consideration as part of first round little LEO processing group but considered in second processing round). 47 C.F.R. � 25.116(c)(4). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Wait Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969); Intelsat, LLC, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 15460, � 59 (2000). EchoStar Application at 10. EchoStar Application at 10. See American Telephone and Telegraph Co. and Ford Aerospace Satellite Services Corp., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 2 FCC Rcd 4431, 4432 (1987). See Applications of CelSat America, Inc.,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-168A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-168A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-168A1.txt
  • reasons as in that order, that Petitioners have shown good cause for granting the requested waivers. Applications to register these devices under Part 68 of our rules may be submitted with this waiver. ORDERING CLAUSES 9. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that the requests for waiver of Section 68.312(i) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. � 68.312(i), by Kyushu Matsushita Electric Co., Ltd., Uniden Engineering Services, Atlinks USA, Inc., and Vtech Telecommunications Limited ARE GRANTED to the extent stated herein. 10. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitions for waiver ARE GRANTED SUBJECT TO
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1704A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1704A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1704A1.txt
  • analyses, we conclude that granting this waiver request, subject to the conditions set forth in this Order, will serve the public interest by providing greater consumer choice and value without increasing the likelihood of harm to the PSTN. ORDERiNG CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.91, 0.291, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the request for waiver of section 68.308(e)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 68.308(e)(1), by Elastic Networks for its Etherloop/Stormport 400 Modem is GRANTED to the extent discussed herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the waiver is GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: (1) When operating in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1722A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1722A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1722A1.txt
  • Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Reminds Narrowband Personal Communications Services (PCS) Licensees of Five-Year Construction Benchmark, Public Notice, 14 FCC Rcd. 9020 (1999). Following the construction deadline, Instapage has had a full opportunity in this proceeding to document the nature and timing of its actual coverage in support of its waiver request. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.925. See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. In the event that Instapage does not want to continue operation, the STA will terminate once the Commission has received notification from Instapage. Once the Commission has granted a new license for channel block 16 in Region 2, we will consider any requests for renewal of the STA in which the new licensee has agreed to continue to allow Instapage
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-175A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-175A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-175A1.txt
  • 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). 47 C.F.R.� 1.7. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See e.g. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (``Waiver is [] appropriate if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, and such deviation would better serve the public interest than strict adherence to the general rule.''); 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See Funding Commitment Decision Letter page 5. -175 -175 ... � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1789A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1789A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1789A1.txt
  • on the FCC Form 175, will assist the Commission in monitoring the participation of these ``designated entities'' in its auctions. Exhibit F -- Miscellaneous Information: Applicants wishing to submit additional information should include it in Exhibit F. Waivers: Applicants requesting waiver of any rules must submit a statement of reasons sufficient to justify the waiver sought. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925. Certifications: Applicants should carefully read the list of certifications on the FCC Form 175. These certifications help to ensure a fair and competitive auction and require, among other things, disclosure to the Commission of certain information on applicant ownership and agreements or arrangements concerning the auction. Submission of an FCC Form 175 application constitutes a representation by the certifying
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1801A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1801A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1801A1.txt
  • in the Alcatel Waiver Order, that Petitioners have shown good cause for granting the requested waivers. Applications to register these devices under Part 68 of our rules may be submitted with this waiver. ORDERING CLAUSES 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that the requests for waiver of Section 68.308(e)(1) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. � 68.308(e)(1) by Efficient Networks Inc., Comtrend Corporation, Chung Fu Chen Yeh Enterprise Corp., DirecTV Broadband, Inc., Kinpo Electronics, Inc., and Apache Micro Peripheral, Inc. ARE GRANTED to the extent stated herein. 8. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1802A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1802A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1802A1.txt
  • reasons as in that order, that Petitioners have shown good cause for granting the requested waivers. Applications to register these devices under Part 68 of our rules may be submitted with this waiver. ORDERING CLAUSES 9. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that the requests for waiver of Section 68.312(i) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 68.312(i), by Cidco Communication, LLC., Vtech Telecommunications Limited, Head Strong International Limited, TMC Corporation, Atlinks USA, Inc., and Kyushu Matsushita Electric Co., Ltd. ARE GRANTED to the extent stated herein. 10. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1815A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1815A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1815A1.txt
  • therefore cannot estimate when it will be able to acquire the software necessary to compile data electronically for the NRUF Report. In an Ex Parte letter filed July 18, 2001, the Petitioner proposed that it could submit a manually prepared report. 5. A Commission rule may be suspended, revoked, amended, or waived, for good cause shown, in accordance with Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules. In prior orders, the Bureau has permitted extensions of time for carriers to file NRUF reports that must be compiled manually where the carrier has identified a specific time frame for the extension. We believe that Petitioner's special circumstance due to its bankruptcy proceeding warrants a limited extension to allow Teligent sufficient time to accurately compile
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1834A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1834A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1834A1.txt
  • waiver of sections 36.611 and 36.612 of the Commission's rules. Consequently, San Carlos's request for accelerated high-cost loop support is denied. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition of San Carlos Apache Telecommunications Utility, Inc. for waiver of sections 36.611 and 36.612 of the Commission's rules IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Petition of San Carlos Apache Telecommunications Utility, Inc., for Waiver of Sections 36.611 and 36.612
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1862A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1862A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1862A1.txt
  • second local aural transmission service. Community Present Proposed Port St. Joe, Florida 228C2 228C2, 242A Coordinates: 29-48-00 NL and 85-17-03 WL Additional Information: Petitioner states that the proposed site is necessary to avoid a shortspacing with WZNS, Ft. Walton Beach, Florida (243C1, with coordinates of 30-24-50 NL and 86-37-40 WL). The proposed allotment requires a site restriction of 2.1 km (1.3 miles) southeast of Port St. Joe at the coordinates indicated above. Port St. Joe is an incorporated community that serves as the county seat of Gulf County. Petitioner states that Port St. Joe has a population of 4,044 persons. In compliance with �1.52 of the Commission's rules, petitioner is requested to include with his comments verification that the statements contained
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1881A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1881A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1881A1.txt
  • window. Instead, the burden of ensuring that complete and accurate information is provided on the correct forms properly rests with applicants themselves. We therefore conclude that, under these circumstances, Chapel Hill has failed to make a showing warranting relief and, therefore, its Request for Waiver must be denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver, filed June 22, 2000 by Chapel Hill Independent School District, Tyler, Texas IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Rita Simpson, Chapel Hill Independent School District, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1898A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1898A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1898A1.txt
  • close of the filing window. Instead, the burden of ensuring that complete and accurate information is provided on the correct forms properly rests with applicants themselves. We therefore conclude that Henry-Senachwine has failed to make a showing warranting relief and, therefore, its Request for Waiver must be denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed June 23, 2000 by Henry-Senachwine Community Unit District #5, Henry, Illinois IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark Seifert, Deputy Chief Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Beverly Privratsky, Henry-Senachwine Community Unit District 5, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1911A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1911A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1911A1.txt
  • mandate to ensure that consumers in all regions of the Nation, including low-income consumers and those in rural, insular, and high-cost areas, have access to telecommunications and information services. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1-4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 U.S.C. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.809(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.809(c), filed by Smith Bagley, Inc. on July 16, 2001, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Smith Bagley, Inc. Petition For Waiver
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1939A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1939A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1939A1.txt
  • We grant an extension of time until October 22, 2001 for submitting comments on Verizon's section 272(d) biennial audit report. An extension of time will afford the Bureau an opportunity to evaluate and consider the issues raised, while preserving the public's ability to comment on the audit report. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.201-0.204, 1.3, 53.209-53.213, the comment period for the Verizon section 272(d) biennial audit report IS EXTENDED to October 22, 2001. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Kenneth P. Moran Chief, Accounting Safeguards Division, CCB (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 01-1939 K L N O T U [ \ ] ^ ` � � � R S T \ ] ` �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1961A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1961A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1961A1.txt
  • is determined based on the percentage of the high bid used to calculate the defined increment. At the outset of the auction, the Bureau will use twenty percent (20%), in which case the Factor will be 1.2. The Bureau has discretion to change the percentage during the auction. If the percentage is thirty percent, for example, the Factor will be 1.3. In addition, the Bureau has discretion during Stage III of the auction to use a second, smaller percentage when calculating the increment used to set acceptable bids higher than the minimum acceptable bid. In all other respects, any such smaller defined increment will be calculated in the same manner as the defined increment used to set the minimum acceptable bid.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1968A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1968A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1968A1.txt
  • by account. We emphasize, however, that our granting of this limited waiver of Section 64.903(b) applies only to SBC's September 2001 CAM filing that incorporates Ameritech into SBC's consolidated CAM. 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i) and 155(c) and Sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291 and 1.3, that Section 64.903(b) is waived to permit SBC to quantify revisions to its cost apportionment table by account rather than by cost pool in its September 2001 CAM filing. Further, in the transmittal letter associated with this CAM filing, SBC need only list the substantive changes. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1977A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1977A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1977A1.txt
  • filing window deadline is warranted. We therefore grant WASD's Waiver Request. We direct SLD to process WASD's FCC Form 471 as timely filed, and if otherwise appropriate, to issue an appropriate Funding Commitment Letter. However, we make no determination as to whether WASD is ultimately entitled to discounts. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by West Allegheny School District, Imperial, Pennsylvania on June 30, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent provide herein, and WASD's application is REMANDED to SLD for further consideration in light of this decision. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1982A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1982A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1982A1.txt
  • subsequently affirmed by the Commission on June 9, 2000. Petitioners agree to the terms of the AirCell Orders, including operation of the AirCell mobile units on a secondary basis, and assert that the legal basis, unique circumstances, and public interest benefits are identical to those that supported and justified the AirCell Orders. Accordingly, the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, pursuant to sections 1.3 and 22.119(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 22.119(a), grants the requests of AirCell, Inc., South Canaan Cellular Communications Company, L.P., Commnet Wireless, Inc., and Commnet of Delaware L.L.C., for waiver of section 22.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 22.925, subject to the terms and conditions set forth In re AirCell, Inc., Petition, Pursuant to Section
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2016A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2016A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2016A1.txt
  • must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, New Paltz fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by New Paltz Central School District, New Paltz, New York, on February 29, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Deborah Brush, New Paltz Central School District, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2017A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2017A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2017A1.txt
  • those employees or agents to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely and proper requests for discounts on its behalf. Here, Painesville fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Painesville City Schools, Painesville, Ohio, on February 28, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from James R. Fodor, Painesville City Local Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed February
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2019A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2019A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2019A1.txt
  • or agents to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely and proper requests for discounts on its behalf. Here, St. Ignatius Loyola fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by St. Ignatius Loyola Academy, Baltimore, Maryland, on September 27, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Jeffrey R. Sindler, Saint Ignatius Loyola Academy, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2020A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2020A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2020A1.txt
  • applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Stephen/Argyle fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by the Stephen/Argyle Central School District, Stephen, Minnesota, on February 26, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Melanie K. Stark, Stephen/Argyle Central School District, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2023A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2023A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2023A1.txt
  • those employees or agents to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely and proper requests for discounts on its behalf. Here, Winchendon fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by the Winchendon School, Winchendon, Massachusetts, on June 30, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from C. Jackson Blair, the Winchendon School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed June 30,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2024A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2024A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2024A1.txt
  • applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Ballard fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by the Ballard Community School District, Huxley, Iowa, on February 20, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Connie Marker, Ballard Community School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2025A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2025A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2025A1.txt
  • applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Elgin fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by the Elgin Independent School District, Elgin, Texas, on November 17, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Barbara Allbright, Elgin Independent School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2027A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2027A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2027A1.txt
  • applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Renaissance fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Renaissance Charter School, Moscow, Idaho on March 20, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Carol Kampenhout, Renaissance Charter School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed March 20, 2001
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2087A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2087A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2087A1.txt
  • assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, St. Jean Vianney fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by St. Jean Vianney School, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on October 31, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Patrice A. Robinson, St. Jean Vianney School, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2097A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2097A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2097A1.txt
  • include non-discount costs of only $4,706,071.20). United Talmudical Academy Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 430-31, para. 15; see also id., 15 FCC Rcd at 431-32, paras. 18-19 (discussing exception). Request for Review at 1; see also id. at 2 (``[W]e have been remiss in our attention to detail . . . .''). Request for Review at 2-3. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; See e.g. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990), (``Waiver is appropriate if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, and such deviation would better serve the public interest than strict adherence to the general rule.'') 47 C.F.R. � 54.504 et seq. 01-2097 01-2097 � � � � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2106A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2106A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2106A1.txt
  • RM-10256 Petitioner: Jeraldine Anderson 1702 Cypress Drive Irving, Texas 75061 Proposal: Allot Channel 284A at Junction, Texas as potentially the community's fourth FM transmission service. Community Present Proposed Junction, Texas 228C2, 277C3, 297A 284A, 228C2, 277C3, 297A Coordinates: 30-28-19 NL and 99-45-47 WL Additional Information: The proposed allotment of Channel 253A at Junction requires a site restriction of 2.1 km (1.3 miles) southeast of Junction (center city coordinates: 30-29-21 NL and 99-46-18 WL). Petitioner states that Junction is an incorporated city with a population exceeding 2,600 persons. FCC Contact: Deborah A. Dupont (202) 418-7072 MM Docket No. 01-229; RM-10257 Petitioner: Charles Crawford 4553 Bordeaux Avenue Dallas, Texas 75205 Proposal: Allot Channel 289A at Caseville, Michigan as the community's first local aural
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2132A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2132A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2132A1.txt
  • telecommunications issues), SkyTel Corp. (provider of nationwide messaging services), and TGA Technologies, Inc. (paging infrastructure manufacturer). The petition is opposed by Arch Wireless, Inc. (Arch) and Cingular Wireless LLC (Cingular). DISCUSSION Section 1.2 of the Commission's rules provides that the Commission may ``on motion or on its own motion issue a declaratory ruling terminating a controversy or removing uncertainty.'' Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules allows the Commission to grant a waiver request upon a showing of good cause. Further, Section 1.925(a)(3) of the Commission's rules provides that the Commission ``may grant a request for waiver if it is shown that: (i) [t]he underlying purpose of the rule(s) would not be served or would be frustrated by application to the instant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2133A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2133A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2133A1.txt
  • be served or would be frustrated by application to the instant case, and that grant of the waiver would be in the public interest; or (2) where the petitioner establishes unique or unusual factual circumstances, application of the rule would be inequitable, unduly burdensome, or contrary to the public interest, or the applicant has no reasonable alternative. Alternatively, under section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, the Commission has authority to waive its rules if there is ``good cause'' to do so. On the facts before us, we find that a partial waiver of our 220 MHz construction requirements is warranted. On a nationwide basis, ILAC holds a total of 28 channels in the 220 MHz service, but because these channels fall
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2137A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2137A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2137A1.txt
  • Central's request for a retroactive waiver of the 30-day appeal deadline for Funding Year 1 applicants who filed untimely appeals, E-Rate Central's request that we also authorize new appeal funding procedures for these applicants is moot. We therefore dismiss this part of the Request for Waiver as well. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed E-Rate Central, Plandome, New York, on August 12, 1999, is DENIED-IN-PART AND DISMISSED-IN-PART. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Winston E. Himsworth, E-Rate Central, to Federal Communications Commission, filed August 12, 1999 (Request
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2139A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2139A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2139A1.txt
  • Commission's rules, effective July 1, 2001, OT&T will be permitted to include an increased amount of corporate operations expenses in the high-cost loop support mechanism. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201-205, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201-205, and 254, and sections 1.3, 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. ��1.3, 0.91, and 0.291, that the request of Oklahoma Telephone & Telegraph, Inc. for waiver of section 36.621(a)(4) of the Commission's rules IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from Toney Prather, OT&T, to Dorothy Attwood, Chief, Common Carrier Bureau, dated April 11,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2158A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2158A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2158A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of AT&T Corp. to Extend Time in Which to Convert Informal Complaints to Formal Complaints and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2159A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2159A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2159A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of Sprint IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section 1.718 of our rules, 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2164A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2164A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2164A1.txt
  • its initial CO codes within ten weeks of launch. As a result, Leap expects to have exhausted its numbering resources, and therefore become unable to activate new customers, for approximately three weeks before additional numbering resources can be activated. The Commission has plenary jurisdiction over those portions of the North American Numbering Plan that pertain to the United States. Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules authorizes the Commission to suspend, revoke, amend, or waive its rules for good cause shown. In demonstrating good cause, an applicant for a waiver ``faces a high hurdle even at the starting gate.'' Moreover, the Commission must in its decision ``explain why deviation [from its rules] better serves the public interest.'' We have reviewed Leap's petition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2166A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2166A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2166A1.txt
  • waiver, replace with a comparable compliant telephone, at no charge to its customers, any telephone returned to EMS containing the TVS component that is shown by the customers' telephone company to have caused harm to the PSTN. ORDERiNG CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.91, 0.291, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the complaint filed by Rath Microtech is GRANTED IN PART, and DENIED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the request filed by Electronic Microsystems, Inc. for waiver of sections 68.2, 68.102, and 68.312 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 68.2, 68.102, 68.312, by Electronic Microsystems, Inc.,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2185A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2185A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2185A1.txt
  • applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Watonwan fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by the Watonwan County Library, St. James, Minnesota, on July 11, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Cheryl Bjoin, Watonwan County Library, to Federal Communications Commission, filed July
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2186A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2186A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2186A1.txt
  • Common Carrier Bureau Deployment of Wireline Services Offering Advanced Telecommunications Capability, CC Docket No. 98-147, Fourth Report and Order, FCC 01-204 (rel. Aug. 8, 2001) (Collocation Remand Order). A summary of the Collocation Remand Order was published at 66 Fed. Reg. 43516 (Aug. 20, 2001) (Collocation Remand Summary). Collocation Remand Summary, 66 Fed. Reg. at 43516. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular); WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972) (WAIT Radio). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 01-2186 Federal Communications Commission DA 01-2186 @& @& �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� ���
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2208A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2208A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2208A1.txt
  • State Data Center. Pyeatt also states that Big Wells has its own local government, post office, city hall, fire department and numerous churches that serve the community. A staff engineering analysis indicates that Channel 271A can be allotted to Big Wells consistent with the minimum distance separation requirements of the Commission's Rules provided there is a site restriction 2.1 kilometers (1.3 miles) east of the community. The site restriction will prevent a conflict with Station KUVA, Channel 272A, Uvalde, Texas. Since Big Wells is located within 320 kilometers of the U.S.-Mexican border, concurrence of the Mexican Government will be requested for the allotment of Channel 271A at Big Wells. 3. In view of the fact that the proposed allotment could provide
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2232A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2232A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2232A1.txt
  • customer's temporary location may be elsewhere in metropolitan New York City. discussion The Commission has plenary jurisdiction of those portions of the North American Numbering Plan that pertain to the United States. Pursuant to that jurisdiction, the Commission has adopted numbering policies that are designed to ensure that carriers have access to numbering resources when needed to serve customers. Section 1.3 of our rules authorizes the Commission to suspend, revoke, amend, or waive, for good cause shown, a Commission rule. In demonstrating good cause, an applicant for a waiver ``faces a high hurdle even at the starting gate.'' Moreover, the Commission must in its decision ``explain why deviation [from its rules] better serves the public interest.'' It is important that telecommunications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2265A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2265A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2265A1.txt
  • seeks a waiver of Section 64.603 of the Commission's rules with regard to its inland system for its service to commercial vessels, including vessels operated by the Corps of Engineers or other government agencies. It does not seek a waiver with regard to its inland system service to passenger vessels, or with regard to its other AMTS services. DISCUSSION Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules authorizes the Commission to suspend, revoke, amend, or waive, for good cause shown, a Commission rule. In addition, Section 1.925 of the Commission's rules provides that the Commission may grant a waiver upon a showing either that: (i) the underlying purpose of the rule(s) would not be served or would be frustrated by application to the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2276A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2276A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2276A1.txt
  • application number 127047 because the record shows that Sperry failed to complete this application. Because there is no completed FCC Form 471 for application number 127045, and because Sperry has failed to demonstrate special circumstances that would so necessitate, a waiver of the filing window is not warranted. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed by Sperry Public Schools, Sperry, Oklahoma, on October 7, 1999 IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from David Jobe, Sperry Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed October 7,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2315A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2315A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2315A1.txt
  • on the FCC Form 175, will assist the Commission in monitoring the participation of these ``designated entities'' in its auctions. Exhibit F -- Miscellaneous Information: Applicants wishing to submit additional information should include it in Exhibit F. Waivers: Applicants requesting waiver of any rules must submit a statement of reasons sufficient to justify the waiver sought. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925. Certifications: Applicants should carefully read the list of certifications on the FCC Form 175. These certifications help to ensure a fair and competitive auction and require, among other things, disclosure to the Commission of certain information on applicant ownership and agreements or arrangements concerning the auction. Submission of an FCC Form 175 application constitutes a representation by the certifying
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2321A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2321A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2321A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of AT&T Corp. to Extend Time in Which to Convert Informal Complaints to Formal Complaints and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2328A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2328A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2328A1.txt
  • must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Bear Lake fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Bear Lake County Library District, Montpelier, Idaho, on November 3, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Mary Nate, Bear Lake County Library District, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2330A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2330A1.txt
  • the SLD website was incorrect. Thus, we find that SLD's posting of an incorrect zip code contributed to the untimely filing by West Las Vegas of its FCC Form 471. We therefore conclude that West Las Vegas has demonstrated special circumstances upon which to grant its waiver request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by West Las Vegas Schools, Las Vegas, New Mexico, on June 26, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent provide herein. We direct SLD to process West Las Vegas's FCC Form 471 as timely filed within the filing window. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2332A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2332A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2332A1.txt
  • applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Midland fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by the Midland School District, Pleasant Plains, Arkansas, on February 15, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Jim LaRue, Midland School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed February
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2333A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2333A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2333A1.txt
  • applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Montville fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by the Montville Township Public Schools, Montville, New Jersey, on March 23, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Dominic J. Butler, Montville Township Public Schools, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2341A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2341A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2341A1.txt
  • granting of this limited waiver of Section 64.903(b) applies only to Verizon's November 2001 CAM filing that incorporates Verizon East's CAM and Verizon West's CAM into a single consolidated CAM. 5. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i) and 155(c) and Sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291 and 1.3, that Section 64.903(b) is waived to permit Verizon to quantify revisions to its cost apportionment table by account rather than by cost pool in its November 2001 CAM filing. Further, in the transmittal letter associated with this CAM filing, Verizon need only list the substantive changes. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2358A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2358A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2358A1.txt
  • the table above, until December 31, 2001. All the other conditions placed on SDI's license shall remain in force, including the condition "Based on non-conformance with the U.S. Table of Frequency Allocations, the operations will be on an unprotected, non-harmful interference basis to all present and future U.S. Government stations." IV. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that SpaceData International, LLC IS GRANTED a waiver of condition (g), imposed in its license in paragraph 26 of Application of SpaceData International LLC For Authority to Operate on a Time-Share Basis NASA's Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System, Order and Authorization, 16 FCC Rcd 9266, 9274 (para. 26) (Int'l Bur., 2001)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2366A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2366A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2366A1.txt
  • grant a limited extension of time until November 20, 2001 for submitting comments on Verizon's section 272(d) biennial audit report. An extension of time will afford the Bureau an opportunity to evaluate and consider the issues raised, while preserving the public's ability to comment on the audit report. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.201-0.204, 1.3, 53.209-53.213, the comment period for the Verizon section 272(d) biennial audit report IS EXTENDED to November 20, 2001. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Kenneth P. Moran Chief, Accounting Safeguards Division, CCB (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 01-2366 F �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �0�
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2372A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2372A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2372A1.txt
  • filing window. Instead, the burden of ensuring that complete and accurate information is provided on the correct forms properly rests with applicants themselves. We therefore conclude that, under these circumstances, Elkhart has failed to make a showing warranting relief and, therefore, its Request for Review must be denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review, filed July 10, 2000 by Elkhart Community Schools, Elkhart, Indiana IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Robert Woods, Elkhart Community Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed July 10, 2000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2373A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2373A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2373A1.txt
  • filing window. Instead, the burden of ensuring that complete and accurate information is provided on the correct forms properly rests with applicants themselves. We therefore conclude that, under these circumstances, Powell has failed to make a showing warranting relief and, therefore, its Request for Review must be denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed July 3, 2000 by Powell County High School, Deer Lodge, Montana IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Joseph A. Brott, Powell County High School, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2376A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2376A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2376A1.txt
  • Contact: Nancy Joyner, (202) 418-2180 (4) MM Docket No. 01-294; RM-10304 Petitioner: Jeraldine Anderson 1702 Cypress Drive Irving, Texas 75061 Proposal: Allot Channel 293A to Eldorado, Texas, as an additional local commercial FM transmission service at that community. Community Present Proposed Eldorado, Texas 285A 285A, 293A Coordinates: 30-51-14 NL; 100-36-43 WL. Additional Information: The allotment proposal requires a site restriction 1.3 km (0.8 mi.) southwest of Eldorado. Additionally, as Eldorado is located within 320 kilometers of the U.S.-Mexico border, concurrence to this proposal by the Mexican government is required. FCC Contact: Nancy Joyner, (202) 418-2180 (5) MM Docket No. 01-295; RM- 10305 Petitioner: Linda Crawford 3500 Maple Ave., #1320 Dallas, Texas 75219 Proposal: Allot Channel 231A to Jayton, Texas, as that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2397A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2397A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2397A1.txt
  • by SBC. This waiver is limited to those corporate services provided under contract between SBC and the affiliates listed in the waiver request. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 201-205, and 218-220 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 154(j), 201-205, and 218-220, and Sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.106, 32.18, and 32.27 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.106, 32.18, and 32.27, that the Petition for Waiver filed by SBC IS GRANTED to the extent described above in paragraph 5. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Kenneth P. Moran Chief, Accounting Safeguards Division Common Carrier Bureau Petition for Waiver Southwestern Bell Communications, Inc., filed July 2, 2001
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2399A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2399A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2399A1.txt
  • the filing window. Instead, the burden of ensuring that complete and accurate information is provided on the correct forms properly rests with applicants themselves. We therefore conclude that, under these circumstances, Garfield has failed to make a showing warranting relief and, therefore, its Waiver Request must be denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed April 17, 2000 by Garfield School District, Garfield, New Jersey IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert, Deputy Chief Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Raymond Hryczyk, Garfield School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed April 17,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2401A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2401A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2401A1.txt
  • Form 470, SLD should have notified Lettie Jensen of the signature deficiency in the form in time for Lettie Jensen to submit an in-window FCC Form 471 that complied with the competitive bidding rules. We therefore further find that good cause exists to grant Lettie Jensen's Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Lettie W. Jensen Library, Amherst, Wisconsin, on February 26, 2001 IS GRANTED to the extent provide herein, and Lettie Jensen's application is REMANDED to SLD for further consideration in light of this decision. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2428A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2428A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2428A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of AT&T Corp. to Extend Time in Which to Convert Informal Complaints to Formal Complaints and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2491A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2491A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2491A1.txt
  • the circumstances in this case taken together are unique enough to warrant the grant of an extension of the interim five-year requirement for an additional period of four months. IV. Ordering Clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i) and 309(j)(4)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 309(j)(4)(B), and sections 0.131, 0.331, 1.3, and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 0.331, 1.3, 1.925, the requests for waiver of section 24.203(a) for the broadband PCS licenses identified by call sign WPOI215 and WPOI217 filed by Telecorp PCS, LLC ARE HEREBY GRANTED by extension of the five-year construction deadline for four additional months. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William W. Kunze Chief, Commercial Wireless
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2492A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2492A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2492A1.txt
  • the circumstances in this case taken together are unique enough to warrant the grant of an extension of the interim five-year requirement for an additional period of six weeks. IV. Ordering Clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i) and 309(j)(4)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 309(j)(4)(B), and sections 0.131, 0.331, 1.3, and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 0.331, 1.3, 1.925, the request for waiver of section 24.203(a) for the broadband PCS license identified by call sign WPOH986 in the Cincinnati-Dayton MTA filed by West Virginia PCS Alliance, L.C. IS HEREBY GRANTED by extension of the five-year construction deadline for six additional weeks. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William W.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2493A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2493A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2493A1.txt
  • on July 10, 2001 in this proceeding is hereby deemed moot and dismissed. Action by the Deputy Chief, Policy and Rules Branch, Commercial Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Arsenault of the Commercial Wireless Division at (202) 418-0920 or rarsenau@fcc.gov. Under Section 1.935(a), Southern's Affidavit should have been filed concurrently with its Request. Pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, we waive, on our own motion, the concurrent filing requirement. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202 / 418-2830 TTY 202 / 418-2555 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov �0� �� ���PNG RR�~R�n� |�o� |�o� X*�N�*K � ~j0tm@"Iu�� �2~��y=��b��"���05 X� ?''z[�'';: ''@�/'", �Z!� g$!���H (c)� �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2496A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2496A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2496A1.txt
  • although ALLTEL has enough numbering resources to meet its projected growth for six months, it is unable to meet this customer's needs because it does not have the quantity of consecutive numbers required for the customer's system. III. Discussion The Commission has plenary jurisdiction of those portions of the North American Numbering Plan that pertain to the United States. Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules authorizes the Commission to suspend, revoke, amend, or waive, for good cause shown. In demonstrating such good cause, an applicant for a waiver ``faces a high hurdle even at the starting gate.'' Moreover, the Commission must in its decision ``explain why deviation [from its rules] better serves the public interest.'' We have reviewed ALLTEL's request and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2497A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2497A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2497A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) National Association of Broadcasters ) Request for Temporary Waiver of ) Public Inspection File Requirements. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: October 25, 2001 Released: October 25, 2001 By the Chief, Mass Media Bureau Pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the National Association of Broadcasters (``NAB''), on behalf of its member stations and all broadcast licensees nationwide, requests a 60-day temporary waiver of Section 73.3526(e)(9) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 73.3526(e)(9), which requires that broadcasters retain in their public inspection files all written comments and suggestions received from the public
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2516A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2516A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2516A1.txt
  • SBC need not obtain forbearance from application of section 272 in order to provide those services on an integrated basis. We therefore deny SBC's request for forbearance. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4, 10, 201-205, 271-272 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154, 160, 201-205, 271-272, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that Qwest's petition for a waiver of the Computer III CEI requirements for the provision of operator-assisted reverse directory services by Qwest IS GRANTED to the extent stated and subject to the conditions and requirements established herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4, 10, 201-205, 271-272 of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2520A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2520A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2520A1.txt
  • those employees to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely and proper requests for discounts in its name. Here, East Brunswick fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find an insufficient basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by East Brunswick Public Schools, East Brunswick, New Jersey, on March 28, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Jamie Savedoff, East Brunswick Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2522A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2522A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2522A1.txt
  • applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Bellevue fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Bellevue Public Library, Bellevue, Iowa, on February 22, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Marian L. Meyer, Bellevue Public Library, to Federal Communications Commission, filed February 26,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2527A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2527A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2527A1.txt
  • must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Forest District fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Forest Municipal School District, Forest, Mississippi, on August 30, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Dr. Ed Leonard, Forest Municipal School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2528A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2528A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2528A1.txt
  • must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Lake Eola fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Lake Eola Charter School, Orlando, Florida, on November 8, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Sharon Morell, Lake Eola Charter School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed November
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2537A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2537A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2537A1.txt
  • properly complete the required application or otherwise fail to follow program rules, run the risk that their applications may not be considered within the filing window. We therefore conclude that Trico has failed to make a showing warranting relief and, therefore, its Request for Review must be denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed June 30, 2000 by Trico Community Unit District #176, Campbell Hill, Illinois IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Dennis Smith, Trico Community Unit School District #176, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2551A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2551A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2551A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of AT&T Corp. to Extend Time in Which to Convert Informal Complaints to Formal Complaints and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2603A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2603A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2603A1.txt
  • in which growth resources are requested. This rule seeks to ensure that existing numbering resources are used efficiently and to prevent carriers from carrying large inventories of numbers that could be used more efficiently by other carriers. III. DISCUSSION The Commission has plenary jurisdiction of those portions of the North American Numbering Plan that pertain to the United States. Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules authorizes the Commission to suspend, revoke, amend, or waive, for good cause shown. In demonstrating such good cause, an applicant for a waiver ``faces a high hurdle even at the starting gate.'' Moreover, the Commission must in its decision ``explain why deviation [from its rules] better serves the public interest.'' We have reviewed TeleCorp's petition and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2604A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2604A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2604A1.txt
  • in which growth resources are requested. This rule seeks to ensure that existing numbering resources are used efficiently and to prevent carriers from carrying large inventories of numbers that could be used more efficiently by other carriers. III. DISCUSSION The Commission has plenary jurisdiction of those portions of the North American Numbering Plan that pertain to the United States. Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules authorizes the Commission to suspend, revoke, amend, or waive, for good cause shown. In demonstrating such good cause, an applicant for a waiver ``faces a high hurdle even at the starting gate.'' Moreover, the Commission must in its decision ``explain why deviation [from its rules] better serves the public interest.'' We hereby grant Guam Cellular's petition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2611A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2611A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2611A1.txt
  • population in their licensed area within 10 years of the initial license grant. Id. The licensed service area for C-block licenses is a Basic Trading Area (``BTA''). 47 C.F.R. � 24.203(b). The licensed service area for D-, E-, and F- block licenses is also a BTA. See 47 C.F.R. � 24.203(a), (b). 47 C.F.R. � 1.925. Alternatively, pursuant to section 1.3, the Commission has authority to waive its rules if there is ``good cause'' to do so. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990); WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.946, 24.843. Section 1.946(e) also states specific circumstances that would not warrant an
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2640A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2640A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2640A1.txt
  • way that SLD processed applications with 14 or more digits. Our decision today does not prohibit SLD from establishing minimum processing standards relating to FCC Form 470 Application Numbers in the future. Our decision is directed only at the consistent treatment of applications under the minimum processing standards. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Pediatric Library, Rainbow Babies & Children's Hospital Ballard Community School District, Cleveland, Ohio, on June 21, 2000 IS GRANTED, and this application is REMANDED for further processing. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Request for Review filed by St.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2642A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2642A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2642A1.txt
  • (Funding Rejection Letter). Letter from Michele Baskin, Lakeshore Public Academy, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed September 6, 2001. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Michele Baskin, Lakeshore Public Academy, dated September 24, 2001. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. FCC Overrules Caldwell Television, 58 RR 2d 1706, 1707 (denying waiver request where unexpected fog closed airports, resulting in late filing of broadcast applications). Federal Communications Commission DA 01-2642 Federal Communications Commission DA 01-2642 � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2646A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2646A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2646A1.txt
  • SLD to require applicants to adhere strictly to its filing deadlines. Accordingly, we believe that waivers of these deadlines should not be routinely granted. For these reasons, we find that the circumstances here do not warrant relief and, therefore, we deny Bais Yaakov's request to waive section 54.720(b). ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Bais Yaakov High School of St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri on September 17, 2001, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2659A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2659A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2659A1.txt
  • Tele-Network, Inc. Request for a Waiver of the Benchmark Settlement Rate on the U.S.-Guyana Route ) ) ) ) ) ) ) IB Docket No. 96-261 ORDER Adopted: November 15, 2001 Released: November 16, 2001 By the Chief, Telecommunications Division: I. introduction and background On July 6, 2001, Atlantic Tele-Network, Inc. (ATN) filed a petition for waiver, pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, of the transition deadline for the benchmark settlement rate on the U.S.-Guyana route. ATN is a U.S. corporation that holds a majority interest in several telecommunications providers in the Carribean, including the incumbent provider in Guyana, Guyana Telephone & Telegraph Ltd. (GT&T). In this Order, we deny ATN's waiver request. In the Commission's 1997 Benchmarks Order,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2661A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2661A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2661A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of AT&T Corp. to Extend Time in Which to Convert Informal Complaints to Formal Complaints and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2670A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2670A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2670A1.txt
  • grant a limited extension of time until January 24, 2002 for submitting comments on Verizon's section 272(d) biennial audit report. An extension of time will afford the Bureau an opportunity to evaluate and consider the issues raised, while preserving the public's ability to comment on the audit report. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.201-0.204, 1.3, 53.209-53.213, the comment period for the Verizon section 272(d) biennial audit report IS EXTENDED to January 24, 2001. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Kenneth P. Moran Chief, Accounting Safeguards Division, CCB (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 01-2670 F �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �0�
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2693A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2693A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2693A1.txt
  • of correcting the error committed by the Administrator so that Keya Paha's application may be processed without further delay and considered on the merits. Therefore, we grant the Administrator's request and direct the Administrator to process Keya Paha's Funding Year 4 FCC Forms 471 consistent with this Order. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.702(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91. 0.291, 1.3, and 54.702(c) that the Request for Guidance filed by the Administrator with respect to Keya Paha County School District, Springview, Nebraska IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Administrator IS DIRECTED to take further action consistent with this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2694A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2694A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2694A1.txt
  • from Carol Gleason, Lincoln Elementary School District No. 27, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed August 23, 2001. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Dr. Robert E. Kidd, Lincoln Elementary School District No. 27, dated August 27, 2001 (Administrator's Decision on Appeal). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. -2694 -2694 � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2695A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2695A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2695A1.txt
  • of correcting the error committed by the Administrator so that North Carolina's application may be processed without further delay and considered on the merits. Therefore, we grant the Administrator's request and direct the Administrator to process North Carolina's Funding Year 3 FCC Form 471 consistent with this Order. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.702(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91. 0.291, 1.3, and 54.702(c) that the Request for Guidance filed by the Administrator with respect to the North Carolina Department of Commerce, ITS, Raleigh, North Carolina IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that SLD IS DIRECTED to take further action consistent with this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2696A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2696A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2696A1.txt
  • 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). 47 C.F.R.� 1.7. Letter from Bob Liles, Pinellas County Schools, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed August 31, 2000. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Bob Liles, Pinellas County Schools, dated September 1, 2000 (Administrator's Decision on Appeal). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See Funding Commitment Decision Letter, at 6-42. -2696 -2696 � e��� ``
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2697A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2697A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2697A1.txt
  • 1.7. Letter from Gail Albin, Potter Valley Community Unified School District, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed September 10, 2001. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Gail Albin, Potter Valley Community Unified School District, dated September 28, 2001 (Administrator's Decision on Appeal). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. -2697 -2697 � l m l m �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2700A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2700A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2700A1.txt
  • administratively necessary to place on the applicant the responsibility of complying with all relevant rules and procedures, including filing deadlines. Here, Trinity fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Trinity Area School District, Washington, Pennsylvania, on February 22, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from James R. Shargots, Trinity Area School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2729A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2729A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2729A1.txt
  • or schedule, or any other ULS-related licensing matter. ULS Licensing Support is available Monday through Friday, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. Eastern Time. If you do not receive the download message, and you are experiencing problems with online filing, you may have an older, incompatible version of the Java Plug-in installed on your computer. (The current version is V. 1.3.0_02.) Please uninstall the older version. Go to Start>Settings>Control Panel>Add/Remove Programs. Select ``Java2 Runtime Environment Standard Edition'' from the list, and click Add/Remove. Once the old Java Plug-in is uninstalled, restart your machine and proceed to ULS and ASR. Download the new Java Plug-in when prompted. NON-PUBLIC FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2732A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2732A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2732A1.txt
  • MSV Implementation Plan. 1.2 MSV Implementation Plan: Certain of the rights and obligations of the Parties are set forth in further detail in the Implementation Plan adopted by MSV in accordance with this Agreement and which is consistent with this Agreement. MSV shall comply with the Implementation Plan, which may be amended from time to time pursuant to Section 7.7. 1.3 CPNI: MSV shall comply with all applicable FCC rules and regulations governing access to and storage of Customer Proprietary Network Information (``CPNI''), as defined in 47 U.S.C. � 222(h)(1). 1.4 Compliance with Lawful U.S. Process: MSV shall take all practicable steps to configure its Domestic Communications Infrastructure such that MSV is capable of complying, and MSV employees in the United
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2748A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2748A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2748A1.txt
  • filings. Parties filing petitions and replies electronically are reminded they are still required to serve copies in accordance with these rules as stated herein. III. ORDERING CLAUSES 8. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in Sections 1-4 and 201-205 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154, 201-205, and Sections 1.1 and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1, 1.3, this Order is ADOPTED. 9. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Section 1.4(f) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.4(f), IS WAIVED for the purpose specified in paragraph 5 supra. 10. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Section 1.47(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(d), IS WAIVED for the purpose
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2749A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2749A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2749A1.txt
  • for SLD to require applicants to adhere strictly to its filing deadlines. Accordingly, we believe that waivers of these deadlines should not be routinely granted. For these reasons, we find that the circumstances here do not warrant relief and, therefore, we deny Prospect's request to waive section 54.720(b). ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on October 2, 2000, by Prospect School District 59, Prospect, Oregon and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2750A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2750A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2750A1.txt
  • applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Winnebago fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its applications. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Winnebago Public Schools, Winnebago, Nebraska on June 16, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Raymond Girard, Winnebago Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed June 16, 2000 (Waiver Request). Id.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-275A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-275A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-275A1.txt
  • the provision by RSL of customer notification and upon the handling of complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by RSL COM U.S.A., Inc. on December 7, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters Associate Chief, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau Implementation of the Subscriber Carrier
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2769A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2769A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2769A1.txt
  • employees or agents to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely and proper requests for discounts on its behalf. Here, West Jasper fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by West Jasper School District, Bay Springs, Mississippi, on May 22, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Dr. Mary Walters and George Duke, West Jasper School District, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2777A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2777A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2777A1.txt
  • and from increasing rates by switching back and forth between rate-of-return regulation and price cap regulation. Discussion For the reasons discussed below, we find that good cause exists for us to waive section 61.41(c)(2) of the Commission's rules, and that it would be in the public interest to grant Saddleback's waiver request. As discussed previously, the courts have interpreted section 1.3 of the Commission's rules to require a petitioner seeking a waiver of a Commission rule to demonstrate that special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, and that such a deviation will serve the public interest. Because Saddleback is significantly smaller than any of the carriers subject to mandatory price cap regulation, we find that special circumstances support a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2780A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2780A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2780A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of AT&T Corp. to Extend Time in Which to Convert Informal Complaints to Formal Complaints and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2798A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2798A1.txt
  • each funding year, it is administratively necessary to place on the applicant the responsibility of understanding all relevant program rules and procedures."). 21242 Federal Communications Commission DA 01-2798 within the window. Here, Peru Central fails to demonstrate a sufficient basis for waiving the Commission's filing window deadline. 8. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Peru Central School, Peru, New York, on June 30, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert 0 Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau 21243
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2799A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2799A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2799A1.txt
  • waive section 54.720(a) of its rules, we deny that request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.106(j) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.106(j) that the Petition for Reconsideration filed by Solon City Schools, Solon, Ohio, on February 8, 2001 IS DISMISSED. IF IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 that the request to waive the 30-day tome limit in which to file an appeal filed by Solon City Schools, Solon, Ohio, on February 8, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Kirk Miller, Solon City Schools,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2800A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2800A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2800A1.txt
  • representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Here, Bnos Zion fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Bnos Zion of Bobov, Inc., Brooklyn, New York October 31, 2001, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2801A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2801A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2801A1.txt
  • Public Library, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed September 4, 2001 (Request for Administrator Review). Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Kathy Summars, Buffalo Public Library, dated September 21, 2001 (Administrator's Decision on Appeal). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). See Request for Review by Anderson School Staatsburg, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Changes to the Board of Directors of the National Exchange Carrier Association, File No. SLD-13364, CC Docket Nos. 96-45 and 97-21, Order, DA 00-2630 (Comm. Car. Bur. Rel. November 24, 2000) at para.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2802A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2802A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2802A1.txt
  • other representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Here, Colusa fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Colusa Unified School District, Colusa, California September 24, 2001, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2803A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2803A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2803A1.txt
  • applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Edgerton fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Edgerton Public School, Edgerton, Minnesota, on August 15, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from LeRoy Domagala, Edgerton Public School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed August 15, 2000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2804A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2804A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2804A1.txt
  • the general rule. Because Helena provides documentation indicating that SLD would have received the application before the end of the filing window for Funding Year 2 if the postal service had delivered it to the correct address, we find that good cause exists to grant Helena's Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Helena Township Public Library, Alden, Michigan on July 31, 2000 IS GRANTED to the extent provide herein, and Helena's application is REMANDED to SLD for further consideration in light of this decision. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2805A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2805A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2805A1.txt
  • other representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Here, Johnson fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Johnson Elementary School, Johnson, Vermont on October 15, 2001, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2807A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2807A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2807A1.txt
  • circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, and such deviation would better serve the public interest than strict adherence to the general rule. Because Sacramento provides evidence that it postmarked its application within the filing window, we find that good cause exists to grant Sacramento's Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Sacramento City Unified School District, Sacramento, California on August 3, 2001 IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein, and Sacramento's application is REMANDED to SLD for further consideration in light of this decision. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2809A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2809A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2809A1.txt
  • rules and procedures. In order for the program to work efficiently, the applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, South Kingstown fails to demonstrate a sufficient basis for waiving the Commission's filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by South Kingstown Public Library, Peace Dale, Rhode Island, on July 3, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Connie Lachowicz, South Kingstown Public Library, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2810A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2810A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2810A1.txt
  • SLD to require applicants to adhere strictly to its filing deadlines. Starr King-Edison has failed to demonstrate good cause for waiving the filing deadline. For these reasons, we find that the circumstances here do not warrant relief, and therefore, we deny Starr King-Edison's request to waive section 54.720(b). ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Starr King-Edison Academy, Long Beach, California on October 18, 2001, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2854A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2854A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2854A1.txt
  • is directly assigned pursuant to Section 36.142(c).'' Row 1440 - No Change. Row 1454 - The definition of this row is revised to read: ``Categories 1.1 and 1.2 Exchange Line that are associated with private lines and WATS lines and are directly assigned pursuant to Section 36.154(g).'' Row 1455 - The definition of this row is revised to read: ``Category 1.3 Exchange Line that is associated with subscriber or common lines that are jointly used for local exchange service and exchange access for state and interstate interexchange services and are allocated pursuant to Section 36.154(g).'' Row 1460 - The definition of this row is revised to read: ``Total Category 1 Exchange Line, total of Rows 1454 and 1455, including Category 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2864A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2864A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2864A1.txt
  • period of forty-five (45) days. This will allow us to consider any timely filed comments before permanent authority is granted pursuant to section 51.333. Ordering CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), and 251 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), and 251, and pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, Verizon's petition is GRANTED to the extent provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffery J. Carlisle Senior Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 51.333. Letter from Richard T. Ellis, Director - Federal Affairs for Verizon, to Jeff Carlisle, Senior Deputy Bureau Chief, Common Carrier Bureau, FCC (December 6,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2875A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2875A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2875A1.txt
  • necessary to place on the applicant the responsibility of complying with all relevant rules and procedures, including filing deadlines. Here, Netherlands Christian fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Netherlands Reformed Christian School, Pompton Plains, New Jersey, on September 4, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from John W. Van Der Brink, Netherlands Reformed Christian School, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2876A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2876A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2876A1.txt
  • special circumstances necessary to allow waiver of the Commission's rules. As a result, these arguments do not rise to the level of good cause necessary to justify waiving our rules. Therefore, to the extent that Grand Isle requests that the Commission waive section 54.720(b), we deny that request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 1.106(j) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 1.106(j) that the Petition for Reconsideration filed by Grand Isle Supervisory Union, North Hero, Vermont, dated November 24, 1999 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief Common Carrier Bureau Petition for Reconsideration of Request for Review of the Decision of the Universal Service Administrator
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-288A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-288A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-288A1.txt
  • or warehousing of scarce orbital resources, and that SDI could not waste or warehouse any orbital resources in this case. We agree with SDI that a waiver of the financial qualification requirement is warranted in this case. The Commission may grant a waiver of its rules only if there is "good cause" for a waiver within the meaning of Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules. Generally, the Commission may grant a waiver of its rules in a particular case only if the relief requested would not undermine the policy objective of the rule in question, and would otherwise serve the public interest. The Commission's financial qualification rules are designed to prevent under-capitalized licensees from holding valuable orbit-spectrum resources to the exclusion
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2910A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2910A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2910A1.txt
  • disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 5. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Petition for Extension of Time filed by Indiana Paging Network, Inc. IS GRANTED. 6. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2912A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2912A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2912A1.txt
  • above does not apply to transactions with section 272 affiliates. For these reasons, we deny BellSouth's petition for waiver with respect to transactions with BSLD. 6. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 201-205, and 218-220 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 154(j), 201-205, and 218-220, and Sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.106, and 32.27 of the Commissions rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.106, and 32.27, that the Petition for Waiver filed by BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. IS HEREBY GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Kenneth P. Moran Chief, Accounting Safeguards Division BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. Expedited Petition for Waiver, filed Aug. 9, 2001 (Petition). See ``Comments sought
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2913A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2913A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2913A1.txt
  • the Phase 2 Report and Order. Therefore, we are waiving the ARMIS reporting requirements and the CAM attestation requirement, for the years 2000 and 2001, for ACS of Anchorage, Inc. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, the ARMIS reporting requirements and the CAM attestation requirement, for the years 2000 and 2001, are hereby waived for ACS of Anchorage, Inc. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Kenneth P. Moran Chief, Accounting Safeguards Division 2000 Biennial Regulatory Review - Comprehensive Review of the Accounting Requirements and ARMIS Reporting Requirements for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2920A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2920A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2920A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of AT&T Corp. to Extend Time in Which to Convert Informal Complaints to Formal Complaints and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2921A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2921A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2921A1.txt
  • up to 12 months to remove the debris from the World Trade Center. Petitioners, therefore, seek a temporary waiver to provide New York City additional time to rebuild its infrastructure and businesses before transitioning to 10-digit dialing. III. Discussion The Commission has plenary jurisdiction over those portions of the North American Numbering Plan that pertain to the United States. Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules authorizes the Commission to suspend, revoke, amend, or waive, any provision of the rules for good cause shown. In demonstrating such good cause, an applicant for a waiver ``faces a high hurdle even at the starting gate.'' Moreover, the Commission must in its decision ``explain why deviation [from its rules] better serves the public interest.'' We
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2956A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2956A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2956A1.txt
  • close of the filing window. Instead, the burden of ensuring that complete and accurate information is provided on the correct forms properly rests with applicants themselves. We therefore conclude that Finley-Sharon has failed to make a showing warranting relief and, therefore, its Request for Review must be denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed August 7, 2000 by Finley-Sharon Public School, Finley, North Dakota IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Lee E. Kelm, Finley-Sharon Public School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed August
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2959A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2959A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2959A1.txt
  • Creek Elementary School, dated March 7, 2001 for Beverly Shores Elementary School, and dated March 19, 2001 for Eustis Elementary School (collectively, Administrator's Decisions on Appeal). Id. Id. Id. Requests for Review. Id. See also SLD Appeals. Id. Requests for Review. Lake County's FCC Forms 471, Block 5, Item 23j, filed January 17-18, 2000. Requests for Review. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See, e.g., Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990). Id. Federal Communications Commission DA 01-2959 Federal Communications Commission DA 01-2959 � � � � � - � � =�6�
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2961A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2961A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2961A1.txt
  • with respect to its Funding Year 2 FCC Form 471. However, the record reflects that the Schools and Libraries Division of the Universal Service Administrative Company provided discounts to Nogales/Santa Cruz for its Funding Year 2 FCC Form 471. We therefore dismiss Nogales/Santa Cruz's Waiver Request as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Nogales/Santa Cruz County Public Library, Nogales, Arizona, on July 25, 2000, IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Suzanne Haddock, Nogales/Santa Cruz County Public Library, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2962A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2962A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2962A1.txt
  • for submitting timely and complete requests for discounts on its behalf. Accordingly, we believe that waivers of these deadlines should not be routinely granted. For these reasons, we find no basis for waiver of the filing window deadline in these circumstances and, therefore, we deny Parrottsville's Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91. 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Parrottsville Community Library, Parrottsville, Tennessee, June 16, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Judy Myers, Parrottsville Community Library, Parrottsville, Tennessee, to Federal Communications Commission, filed June 16,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2963A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2963A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2963A1.txt
  • relevant rules and procedures. In order for the program to work efficiently, the applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Smackover fails to demonstrate a sufficient basis for waiving the Commission's filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Smackover Public Schools, Smackover, Arkansas, on July 18, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Leland Watts, Smackover Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed July 18, 2000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2978A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2978A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2978A1.txt
  • that they had postmarked their FCC Forms 471 at least three days before the filing window deadline, or that they mailed the forms via guaranteed overnight courier at least one day before the deadline, will be deemed to have filed their FCC Forms 471 within the filing window. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the following Waiver Requests ARE REMANDED TO SLD for further review consistent with this opinion: Hardee County School Board, Wauchula, Florida, filed August 28, 2000; Goldennet Educational Technology Alliance, Bakersfield, California, filed June 2, 2000; St. Michael Elementary School, Hastings, Nebraska, filed July 18, 2000;
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2979A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2979A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2979A1.txt
  • in effect, before the party has complied under old rules, is a special circumstance that warrants a deviation of the general rule and the deviation will serve the public interest. 3. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, the annual CAM filing requirement, due December 31, 2001, is hereby waived for all mid-sized incumbent LECs. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Kenneth P. Moran Chief, Accounting Safeguards Division 47 C.F.R. � 64.903. 2000 Biennial Regulatory Review - Comprehensive Review of the Accounting Requirements and ARMIS Reporting Requirements for Incumbent Local
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3008A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3008A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3008A1.txt
  • Letter''). Id. at 2. Id. (attaching Draft New Recommendation on Operation and Control of AMSS Networks in the 14.0-14.5 GHz Band Relative to FSS Networks, United States of America, Delayed Contribution, Document 4A/278-E (September 26, 2001)). The recommends section includes specific recommended methods for avoiding interference. Boeing Receive-Only Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 5866 � 8 (citing 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (``WAIT Radio'')). WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1157. See also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1157. Fugro-Chance, Inc., Order and Authorization, 10 FCC Rcd 2860, 2860 � 2 (Int'l Bur. 1995) (authorizing non-conforming MMSS in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3026A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3026A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3026A1.txt
  • Florida Commission's decision to postpone ten-digit dialing in the 954 NPA and related EAS routes until sometime after the activation of the overlay is not consistent with section 52.19(c)(3)(ii). Consequently, we proceed with our analysis of the Florida Commission's petition to temporarily waive the ten-digit dialing requirement. B. Request for Temporary Waiver of the Ten-Digit Dialing Requirement Pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, the Commission may grant a waiver of its rules upon a showing of ``good cause.'' As determined by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, section 1.3 allows the Commission to grant a waiver if special circumstances warrant a departure from the general rule and that departure serves the public interest. The Bureau
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3029A1.doc
  • two-year temporary waiver of the requirement to be capable of handling pay-per-call service is appropriate at this time. Because the demand for pay-per-call VRS services is expected to be low, we see no reason to burden VRS providers with this costly requirement at this time. Ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, that the request of the Hamilton Telephone Company for waiver of section 64.604(a)(3) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 64.604(a)(3), IS GRANTED, for a period of two years, beginning on the release date of this order, and is extended to all VRS providers, current or prospective, for the same
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-302A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-302A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-302A1.txt
  • of this waiver is conditioned upon Mescalero's provision of customer notification, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplement. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91,0.291, 1.3, the expedited waiver request filed by Mescalero Apache Telecom, Inc. on December 4, 2000, and supplemented on February 1, 2001, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters Associate Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-303A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-303A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-303A1.txt
  • reasons as in that order, that Petitioners have shown good cause for granting the requested waivers. Applications to register these devices under Part 68 of our rules may be submitted with this waiver. ORDERING CLAUSES 9. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that the requests for waiver of Section 68.312(i) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. � 68.312(i), by Atlinks USA, Inc., and Vtech Telecommunications Limited ARE GRANTED to the extent stated herein. 10. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitions for waiver ARE GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: that the stutter dial tone
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-304A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-304A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-304A1.txt
  • in the Alcatel Waiver Order, that Petitioners have shown good cause for granting the requested waivers. Applications to register these devices under Part 68 of our rules may be submitted with this waiver. ORDERING CLAUSES 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that the requests for waiver of Section 68.308(e)(1) ) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. � 68.308(e)(1) by Ambit Microsystems Corporation, and Alcatel Canada Inc. ARE GRANTED to the extent stated herein. 8. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitions for waiver ARE GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE following conditions: that the devices (1)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-316A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-316A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-316A1.txt
  • C.F.R. � 54.720(b). 47 C.F.R.� 1.7. Letter from Renee C. Melby, Ashby Public Schools, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., filed December 15, 2000. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Renee Melby, Ashby Public Schools, dated December 20, 2000 (Administrator's Decision on Appeal). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. -316 -316 �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-353A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-353A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-353A1.txt
  • Tennessee of the Decision of the Universal Service Administrator, Request for Review by Integrated Systems and Internet Solutions, Inc., of the Decision of the Universal Service Administrator, Request for Review by Education Networks of America of the Decision of the Universal Service Administrator, CC Docket Nos. 96-45 and 97-21, Order, 14 FCC Rcd 13734 (1999) (Tennessee Order). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972); Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. Tennessee Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 13746-55, paras. 25-42. In the Tennessee Order, the Commission concluded that a facility located on an applicant's premises
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-397A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-397A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-397A1.txt
  • of the transfers of control of licenses and lines from TruCom to BridgeCom, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the joint waiver request filed by TruCom Corporation and BridgeCom International, Inc. on January 12, 2001, IS GRANTED subject to the conditions, and to the extent, indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters Associate Chief, Accounting Policy Division,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-400A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-400A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-400A1.txt
  • Docket No. 00-146 ; RM-9937; 15 FCC Rcd 15809 (2000) Action: At the request of Robert Sanders, we are allotting Channel 250A at Marietta, Mississippi , as the community's first local aural transmission service. Coordinates: The reference coordinates for Channel 250A at Marietta are 34-30-20 North Latitude and 88-27-18 West Longitude Additional Information: This allotment requires a site restriction of 1.3 kilometers (0.8 miles) east to avoid short-spacings to the licensed site of Station WWMS(FM), Channel 248C1, Oxford, Mississippi, Station WKGL(FM), Channel 249A, Russellville, Alabama, and Station WZLQ(FM), Channel 253C1, Tupelo, Mississippi. FCC Contact: Sharon P. McDonald (202) 418-2180 MM Docket No. 00-147; RM-9938; 15 FCC Rcd 15809 (2000) Action: At the request of The Parker Radio Project, we are allotting
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-410A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-410A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-410A1.txt
  • make adjustments to their price cap indices to reflect cost changes resulting from rule waivers. We require Qwest to make such an adjustment. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Citizens Telecommunications Company of Wyoming and Qwest Corporation on August 21, 2000, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-41A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-41A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-41A1.txt
  • conclude that it is in the public interest to grant USAC's waiver. USAC expects that shifting their meeting dates will decrease administrative costs. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 254, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by the Universal Service Administrative Company on December 14, 2000 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Katherine L. Schroder Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 54.709(a)(3). Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC), Petition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-422A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-422A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-422A1.txt
  • by GTE. This waiver is limited to those corporate services provided under contract between GTE and the affiliates listed in the waiver request. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 201-205, and 218-220 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 154(j), 201-205, and 218-220, and Sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.106, 32.18, and 32.27 of the Commissions rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.106, 32.18, and 32.27, that the Petition for Waiver filed by GTE Services Corporation IS GRANTED to the extent described above in paragraph 8. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Kenneth P. Moran Chief, Accounting Safeguards Division Common Carrier Bureau Petition for Waiver GTE Corporation., filed March 1, 2000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-438A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-438A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-438A1.txt
  • The grant of this waiver is conditioned upon the provision of customer notification, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Indiana Bell Telephone Company d/b/a Ameritech Indiana, Pacific Bell Telephone Company, and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company on January 5, 2001 IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters Associate
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-450A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-450A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-450A1.txt
  • of this waiver is conditioned upon the provision of customer notification, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplement. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91,0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Southwestern Bell Telephone Company on February 5, 2001, and supplemented on February 14, 2001, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters Associate Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-471A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-471A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-471A1.txt
  • Alcatel Waiver Order, that the Petitioner has shown good cause for granting the requested waiver. An application to register this device under Part 68 of our rules may be submitted with this waiver. ORDERING CLAUSES 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that the request for waiver of Section 68.308(e)(1) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. � 68.308(e)(1) by U.S. Robotics Corporation IS GRANTED to the extent stated herein. 8. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE following conditions: that the devices (1) meet the transmitter spectral response
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-475A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-475A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-475A1.txt
  • Order). Collocation Reconsideration Order, supra note 1, at � 36. Deployment of Wireline Services Offering Advanced Telecommunications Capability, CC Docket No. 98-147, Memorandum Opinion and Order, DA 00-2528 (Com. Car. Bur. rel. Nov. 7, 2000) (``Collocation Waiver Order''). 47 U.S.C. � 251(c)(6). The Alabama Public Service Commission (``Alabama Commission'') filed comments in response to BellSouth's waiver request. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. A rule may be waived where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). In addition, we may take into account considerations of hardship, equity, or more effective implementation of overall policy on an individual basis. WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-492A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-492A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-492A1.txt
  • is developing, to comply with the rule. Based upon the vendor's best estimate, the database should be operational by May 15, 2001. SBC, however, notes that they cannot guarantee this date and that an additional waiver may be required. Discussion We agree with Sprint, Verizon and SBC that ``good cause'' exists for granting the requested temporary extension pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules. We therefore grant all of the carriers and states using Sprint as their relay provider a six-month extension, until June 18, 2001, to comply with the new automated PSAP emergency call requirements as set forth in section 64.604(a)(4) of our rules. Sprint currently gives emergency calls to its relay centers the highest priority and has procedures
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-497A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-497A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-497A1.txt
  • that it is unable to comply with the February 1, 2001 deadline for similar reasons. It states that it modified its software to be able to retrieve the required data, but the modified software did not capture all of the required data. BellSouth states that it discovered extensive errors to its utilization data the day before the filing deadline. Section 1.3 of our rules authorizes the Commission to suspend, revoke, amend, or waive, for good cause shown, a Commission rule. Although petitioners should have resolved any software and systems problems sufficiently in advance of the filing deadline, we believe that each petitioner made a good faith attempt to submit the data in a timely manner. Petitioners indicate that ``but for'' the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-507A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-507A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-507A1.txt
  • NTCA and USTA support this waiver request. Discussion For the reasons discussed below, we find that good cause exists for us to waive section 61.41(c)(2) of the Commission's rules, and that it would be in the public interest to grant the waiver request of All West, Carbon/Emery, Central Utah, Hanksville, and UBET. As discussed previously, the courts have interpreted section 1.3 of the Commission's rules to require a petitioner seeking a waiver of a Commission rule to demonstrate that special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, and that such a deviation will serve the public interest. We find that special circumstances warrant a waiver of section 61.41(c)(2). In evaluating requests for waiver of section 61.41(c)(2), the Bureau has taken
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-509A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-509A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-509A1.txt
  • By extending this deadline, we provide the independent auditor with more time to complete its work, thereby ensuring a complete and accurate draft audit report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 254 and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, the waiver request filed by the Universal Service Administrative Company on July 26, 2000 is GRANTED to the extent indicated herein to allow submission of the draft audit report for the year 2000 on or before April 15, 2001. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-513A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-513A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-513A1.txt
  • or enjoy the exclusive right of handling telecommunications to or from the United States, its territories or possessions, and any other country or territory, by reason of any concession, contract, understanding or working arrangement to which the satellite operator or any persons or companies controlling or controlled by the operator or parties. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, each earth station with "ALSAT" designated as a point of communication, IS GRANTED a waiver of Sections 25.202(g), 25.210(a)(1), 25.210(a)(3), and 25.211(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 25.202(g), 25.210(a)(1), 25.210(a)(3), 25.211(a), for the limited purpose of communicating with NSS-513, NSS- 803, or NSS-806 subject to the conditions set forth in its earth station license
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-578A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-578A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-578A1.txt
  • if no other issues are present that preclude a grant, the Division will issue an order granting the waiver request. The party receiving such a waiver grant may then pursue equipment certification under the applicable Part 68 rules. ORDERiNG CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.91, 0.291, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the requests for waiver of section 68.317(f) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 68.317(f), by Tandy Corporation, Walker Equipment Company, Ameriphone, Inc., and Ultratec, Inc., ARE GRANTED to the extent discussed herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the waiver requests ARE GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: (1)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-593A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-593A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-593A1.txt
  • opening bid for the license. The defined increment will be calculated as follows. Presuming, for example, that the percentage being used is 20 percent, we will multiply the standing high bid (or, if no standing high bid exists for the particular license, the minimum opening bid) by 1.2. (If the percentage being used is 30 percent, we would multiply by 1.3, etc.) We will round the result to the nearest $100 for results below $10,000 and to the nearest $1,000 for amounts above $10,000. The defined increment then will be determined by subtracting the standing high bid (or, if applicable, the minimum opening bid) from the rounded result. At the start of the auction, we propose to use 20 percent to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-612A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-612A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-612A1.txt
  • after USAC receives all necessary information from the Wyoming Commission, whichever is later. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 254, sections 54.309 and 54.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 54.309, 54.311, and authority delegated by sections 0.291 and 1.3 of the Commission rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.291, 1.3, that the petition filed by the Wyoming Public Service Commission on March 30, 2000, is GRANTED to the extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this order is EFFECTIVE UPON RELEASE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.309, 54.311. Petition of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-640A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-640A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-640A1.txt
  • copies of the comments should also be sent to the Network Services Division, 445 12th Street, SW, Room 6-A207, Washington, DC 20554. The petition and public comments will be available for review and copying during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554, (202) 418-0270. . 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969). Id. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe, 401 U.S. 402, 416 (1971). FPC v. Texaco Inc., 377 U.S. 33, 39 (1964). Northeast Cellular Telephone Company, L.P. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). +D`� 0�\ +D`� +D�� �� �0� �� �� �����PNG > �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-658A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-658A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-658A1.txt
  • at 1 (Oct. 4, 2000). See Comments of PanAmSat Corporation, File No. SES-LIC-20000828-01578, at 1-2 (Nov. 3, 2000). See id. at 5. See id. at 3-4. See id. at 4. See Response of The Boeing Company, File No. SES-LIC-20000828-01578, at 1-2 (Nov. 16, 2000). See id. at 2. See id. at 1. See id. at 2-5. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C.Cir. 1969) (WAIT Radio). WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1157. Id. 7 FCC Rcd 7943 (1992). 4 FCC Rcd 1543 (1989). See 7 FCC Rcd at 7943-44; 4 FCC Rcd at 1544. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.102(a). Fugro-Chance, 10 FCC Rcd 2860, 2860 (1995); see also Motorola Satellite Communications, 11
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-659A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-659A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-659A1.txt
  • findings of the Oklahoma Commission, we conclude that the petitioners have demonstrated that grant of this waiver request will serve the public interest. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Pioneer Telephone Cooperative, Inc., Panhandle Telephone Cooperative, Inc., and EagleNet, Inc., on January 24, 2000, IS GRANTED, as described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Katherine L. Schroder Chief, Accounting Policy Division Pioneer Telephone Cooperative, Inc.,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-695A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-695A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-695A1.txt
  • in the Alcatel Waiver Order, that Petitioners have shown good cause for granting the requested waivers. Applications to register these devices under Part 68 of our rules may be submitted with this waiver. ORDERING CLAUSES 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that the requests for waiver of Section 68.308(e)(1) ) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. � 68.308(e)(1) by Samsung Electronics Co., Inc., GVC Corporation, Netopia Inc., Westell Technologies Inc., CastleNet Technology Inc., Korea One Telecommunication Technology, Inc., Archtek Telecom Corporation, Ambit Microsystems Corporation, Amigo Technology, Inc., Abocom Systems, Inc., D-Link Corporation, CIS Technology
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-747A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-747A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-747A1.txt
  • grant a limited waiver of the Commission's competitive bidding rules. Baldwin may extend their existing contracts for non-recurring services voluntarily until September 30, 2001, without having to comply with the Commission's competitive bidding process. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i) and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, the Request for Waiver filed by Baldwin County Board of Education IS GRANTED, and Baldwin's deadline for implementation of non-recurring services IS EXTENDED to September 30, 2001. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Baldwin may extend its existing contracts for non-recurring services voluntarily until September 30, 2001, without having to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-751A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-751A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-751A1.txt
  • I channel licenses, and ITFS modifications to main stations will be filed on the first day, we will allow licensees to file applications throughout the week commencing April 16, 2001. This April 16th filing window will last five days, and all applications filed during that week will be deemed filed as of Friday, April 20, 2001. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 21.27 and 74.911. We encourage applicants to file early in the week. All subsequent windows will last one day. For example, any FCC Form 331 or Form 330 major modification application filed after midnight on April 20, 2001, will receive an Application Reference Number (ARN) that reflects a filing date of the next business day, Monday, April 23, 2001. Thereafter,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-773A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-773A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-773A1.txt
  • FCC Form 471 filing deadline. The record shows that Audrey Pack complied with the program's requirements in providing additional information to SLD on December 13, 2000. Thus, the untimely posting of the FCC Form 470 is not attributable to Audrey Pack. We therefore grant Audrey Pack's waiver request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Audrey Pack Memorial Library, Spring City, Tennessee on July 3, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent provide herein. We direct SLD to process Audrey Pack's FCC Form 471 as timely filed within the filing window. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-786A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-786A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-786A1.txt
  • 3750 125 -90 161 16 1.6 0.02 W-CDMA 27 5000 125 -90 161 16 1.6 0.02 TDMA 27 30 125 -90 100 10 1.0 0.02 TDMA 27 200 125 -90 161 16 1.6 0.02 CDMA 27 1250 Response Station 6000 -67 6.4 0.6 0.06 0.00 CDMA 27 3750 6000 -67 11.3 1.1 0.11 0.00 W-CDMA 27 5000 6000 -67 12.9 1.3 0.13 0.00 TDMA 27 30 6000 -67 1.6 0.2 0.02 0.00 TDMA 27 200 6000 -67 3.2 0.3 0.03 0.00 Table 5.2 also shows that only 2 megahertz of guard band is need to account for the 3G system energy that overlaps the ITFS/MDS channel. Therefore, the energy in the adjacent channel is the limiting factor in this case. We
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-786A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-786A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-786A2.txt
  • 3750 125 -90 161 16 1.6 0.02 W-CDMA 27 5000 125 -90 161 16 1.6 0.02 TDMA 27 30 125 -90 100 10 1.0 0.02 TDMA 27 200 125 -90 161 16 1.6 0.02 CDMA 27 1250 Response Station 6000 -67 6.4 0.6 0.06 0.00 CDMA 27 3750 6000 -67 11.3 1.1 0.11 0.00 W-CDMA 27 5000 6000 -67 12.9 1.3 0.13 0.00 TDMA 27 30 6000 -67 1.6 0.2 0.02 0.00 TDMA 27 200 6000 -67 3.2 0.3 0.03 0.00 Table 5.2 also shows that only 2 megahertz of guard band is need to account for the 3G system energy that overlaps the ITFS/MDS channel. Therefore, the energy in the adjacent channel is the limiting factor in this case. We
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-788A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-788A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-788A1.txt
  • Conversion to Digital Television, WT Docket No. 99-168, CS Docket No. 98-120, MM Docket No. 00-39, Third Report and Order, FCC 01-25 (rel. Jan. 23, 2001)(``Third Report and Order''). See ``Auction of Licenses for the 747-762 and 777-792 MHz Bands Postponed Until September 12, 2001,'' Public Notice, Report No. AUC-01-31-A, DA 01-266 (rel. Jan. 31, 2001). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (suspension, amendment, and waiver of Commission Rules). See also 5 U.S.C. � 553(b)(3)(B). See, e.g., 47 U.S.C. �� 309(j), 337. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. �� 1.49, 1.429. See, e.g., 47 U.S.C. �� 303, 309(j), 337. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). See id. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.419(c). - PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-802A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-802A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-802A1.txt
  • waiver is conditioned upon PNG's provision of customer notification and handling of complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by PowerNet Global Communications on March 28, 2001, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters Associate Chief, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau Implementation of the Subscriber Carrier Selection
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-803A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-803A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-803A1.txt
  • by Petitioners of customer notification and upon the handling of complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplement. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Talk.com Inc., Talk.com Holding Corp., Access One Communications Corp., The Other Phone Company, Inc. d/b/a Access One, and OmniCall, Inc. on March 13, 2001 and supplemented on March 28, 2001, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-868A4.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-868A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-868A4.txt
  • Auction, C, D, E, & F Broadband PCS Auction, BTA - Basic Trading Area, March 23, 1999 Bidder Information Package at 111 (``Auction No. 22 Bidder Information Package''), citing 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105 (which permits auction applicants to amend or modify their short-form applications to make minor changes or correct minor errors). 47 C.F.R. � 1.925. Highland's citation to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, does not alter our analysis, since the applicable standard is set forth in section 1.925. Petition for Reconsideration at 1. See ClearCall, Inc., 12 FCC Rcd at 967-68. Id. at 968-69. Id. at 970-71. Id. In the Matter of Two Way Radio of Carolina, Inc. Request for Waiver of 47 C.F.R. �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-872A1.txt
  • is conditioned upon the provision of customer notification and the handling of complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Gallatin River Communications, LLC, Madison River Long Distance Solutions d/b/a Gallatin River Long Distance, Madison Telephone Company, and Madison Network Systems, Inc. on March 8, 2001, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-876A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-876A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-876A1.txt
  • (affirming Universal Service First Report and Order in part and reversing and remanding on unrelated grounds), cert. denied, Celpage, Inc. v. FCC, 120 S. Ct. 2212 (May 30, 2000), cert. denied, AT&T Corp. v. Cincinnati Bell Tel. Co., 120 S. Ct. 2237 (June 5, 2000), cert. dismissed, GTE Service Corp. v. FCC, 121 S.Ct. 423 (Nov. 2, 2000). 47 C.F.R. �1.3. WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1158 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972) (WAIT Radio). Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular) WAIT Radio, 897 F.2d at 1157. Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.505(b)(1); Instructions for Completing the Schools and Libraries Universal Service,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-908A1.doc
  • is conditioned upon the provision of customer notification and the handling of complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the emergency waiver request filed by Manhattan Telecommunications Corporation d/b/a Metropolitan Telecommunications a/k/a MetTel on April 4, 2001 IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters Associate Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1016A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1016A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1016A1.txt
  • permit TT&C operations in the 3650-3700 MHz bands for FSS systems, upon a particularized showing of need. See id. at �130. Because WB has not requested the use of the 3650-3700 MHz bands for TT&C operations and because the Commission has not yet adopted the proposed amendment of Section 25.202(g), this proceeding is not relevant to WB's applications. See Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (2001). See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (``WAIT Radio''); Northeast Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (``Northeast Cellular''). Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1157. Amendment of the Commission's Rules With Regard to the 3650-3700 MHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1028A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1028A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1028A1.txt
  • prepare their comments in light of the forthcoming Order on Remand, as they request, without depriving AirCell and its partners of meaningful review of their request to extend the waiver, and will allow sufficient time for full and careful consideration of the arguments presented by all parties to this proceeding. For the above reasons, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that the Motion to Suspend Comment Dates filed by AT&T Wireless Services, Inc., Cingular Wireless LLC, and Verizon Wireless, IS GRANTED to the extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the waiver of Section 22.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 22.925, granted to AirCell and its partner licensees, is extended
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-104A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-104A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-104A1.txt
  • disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 6. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Petition for Additional Extension of Time filed by Indiana Paging Network, Inc. IS GRANTED. 7. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1065A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1065A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1065A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of AT&T Corp. Requesting Additional Extension of Time in Which to Convert Informal Complaint Against CTC Telcom to Formal Complaint and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. against
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1068A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1068A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1068A1.txt
  • IS FURTHER ORDERED that the license term for the Galaxy VIII(I)-R satellite is fifteen years and will begin to run on the date PanAmSat Licensee Corporation certifies to the Commission that the satellite has been successfully placed into orbit and its operation fully conforms to the terms and conditions of this authorization. 25. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that PanAmSat Licensee Corporation is GRANTED a waiver of 47 C.F.R. � 25.210(e), File No. SAT-WAV-20020322-00031, and Galaxy VIII(I)-R is authorized to use circular polarization on its Ku-band transponders. We remind PanAmSat of its obligation to protect the routinely licensed services of other satellite networks and to coordinate its non-compliant services with
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-106A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-106A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-106A1.txt
  • Rules to permit type certification of its dual spacing transceivers. Therefore, we will grant the waiver requests, conditioned on the resolution of the Notice of Proposed Rule Making. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES . Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority of Sections 4(i) and 303(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 303(i), and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that the Requests for Waiver of Section 87.173(b) filed by Rockwell Collins, Inc. on October 29, 2001, and November 2, 2001, IS GRANTED, subject to the resolution of the Notice of Proposed Rule Making in WT Docket No. 01-289. . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Section 87.173(b) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1070A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1070A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1070A1.txt
  • Telesaurus Request, filed on May 6, 2002 (5 days before the May 10, 2002 filing date), therefore was late-filed. Telesaurus requests that we extend the comment cycle by three business days noting, inter alia, that such an extension would permit it to incorporate new technical research into its comments and that Progeny does not oppose its request. Pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, we waive on our motion the section 1.46(b) 7-day filing requirement. We find that the public interest will be served by a brief extension of both the comment and reply dates to allow for a more complete record in this proceeding. Accordingly, the new comment due date is May 15, 2002 and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1072A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1072A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1072A1.txt
  • Informal Complaint. Indiana Paging indicates that it has settled its dispute with the final remaining defendant, Verizon. Thus, Indiana Paging requests that the Commission dismiss its informal complaint and terminate this proceeding. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Partial Withdrawal and Request for Dismissal of Informal Complaint filed by Indiana Paging Network, Inc. IS GRANTED and this proceeding IS TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Radhika V. Karmarkar Deputy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1090A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1090A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1090A1.txt
  • with NYC BOE does not create eligibility if WYNE is otherwise ineligible. Eligibility is based on the function of the site, not the association with eligible entities. Because WNYE is not eligible to receive discounted local, long distance, and cellular service, we affirm SLD's denial of WNYE's application. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by New York City Board of Education, Brooklyn, New York, on behalf of applicant, NYC BOE/WYNE, New York, New York, on May 21, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Jackson
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1102A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1102A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1102A1.txt
  • deadline for filing that was given to applicants that met the Year 3 Server Failure Order criteria. Therefore, Bennett has demonstrated that it satisfied the criteria of the Year 3 Server Failure Order and its FCC Form 471 should be considered as timely filed within the filing window. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Bennett County School District 3-1, Martin, South Dakota on May 30, 2001, IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Ken Luckert, Bennett County School District 3-1 to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1103A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1103A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1103A1.txt
  • failed to demonstrate that it submitted the correct Funding Year 4 FCC Form 471 application in compliance with the required minimum processing standards for Funding Year 4. We further, conclude that, Capitol Region has failed to make a showing warranting relief and we deny its Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed August 2, 2001 by Capitol Region Library Council, Windsor, Connecticut IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Kenneth Sutton, Capitol Region Library Council, to Federal Communications Commission, dated
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1106A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1106A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1106A1.txt
  • public interest. Freeman has not offered an additional explanation of why it was late in submitting the applications, other than its unsubstantiated claim that it was affected by the server failure. We therefore conclude that Freeman has not demonstrated special circumstances upon which to grant its Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Freeman School District No. 358, Rockford, Washington, on June 15, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Jan Davis, Freeman School District No. 358, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1109A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1109A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1109A1.txt
  • to its website. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under section 1.106(j) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.106(j), that the Petition for Reconsideration filed by E-Rate Central on behalf of Levittown Union Free School District, Levittown, New York, on February 15, 2001, IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the request for waiver filed by E-Rate Central on behalf of Levittown Union Free School District, Levittown, New York, and other unspecified applicants, on February 15, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Petition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1113A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1113A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1113A1.txt
  • representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Here, Perth Amboy fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Perth Amboy Public Schools, Perth Amboy, New Jersey on October 5, 2001, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file the appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1114A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1114A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1114A1.txt
  • require applicants to adhere strictly to its filing deadlines. Pleasantville has failed to demonstrate the merits of its Request for Review, or good cause for waiving the filing deadline. For these reasons, we find that the circumstances here do not warrant relief and, therefore, we deny Pleasantville's request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on July 11, 2001, by Pleasantville Public Schools, Pleasantville, New Jersey IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Addison Williams, Pleasantville Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1119A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1119A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1119A1.txt
  • manner. Here, the record reflects that Arugath did not file its FCC Form 471 within the filing window and Arugath fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find an insufficient basis for waiving the filing window deadline. 6. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Yeshivah and Mesivta Arugath Habosem, Brooklyn, New York, on August 2, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Israel Engelman, Yeshivah and Mesivta Arugath Habosem, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1121A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1121A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1121A1.txt
  • relevant information was not ``easily discernable.'' Even if SLD were to consider the contract here, the reference to ``circuits to the [district]'' would not qualify as the sort of unambiguous evidence from which the entities receiving service may be easily discernable. Therefore, we deny the Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by East Meadow Union Free School District, East Meadow, New York, on July 16, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Winston E. Himsworth, E-Rate Central, on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1126A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1126A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1126A1.txt
  • other representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Here, Forestburg fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Forestburg Independent School District, Forestburg, Texas on January 11, 2002, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1147A6.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1147A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1147A6.txt
  • following minimum hardware and software is required to use the FCC Remote Access System: CPU: Pentium 133 or above "! Dial-Up Networking feature included with the operating system Web Browser, either of the following: Microsoft(R) Internet Explorer 4.0 or higher (recommended). If you have Internet Explorer 5.0 or higher, your browser must have either Microsoft VM or Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1 installed. ct to the FCC Network, you must use Dial-Up Networking. Dial-Up Networking establishes a point-to-point connection from your PC to the FCC Network. This point-to-point connection is not routed through the Internet. To access the FCC Automated Auction System, configure your dial-up network to dial 900-555-5335. (Alternatively, you can configure your dial-up network to dial 900-555-5554.) The first minute
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1149A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1149A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1149A1.txt
  • Angela M. Simpson, counsel to Securicor Wireless, Inc. (June 6, 2001). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106(f) and (i). May 2001 Petition at 2-3. April 2000 Petition at 4 (citing 47 C.F.R. � 1.45). April 2000 Petition at 4. 47 C.F.R. � 1.45. 47 U.S.C. � 308(b). 47 C.F.R. � 1.939(c). April 2000 Petition at 4. 47 C.F.R. � 1.52. 47 C.F.R. �1.3; In re Applications of Knox Broadcasting, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 3337, � 2 (1997). 47 C.F.R. �1.52. April 2000 Petition at 4. April 2000 Petition at 6. In the Section 308(b) Response, Securicor included a notice of rent increase for the station site dated September 15, 1997; invoices dated September 29, 1995, and November 30, 1995,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1192A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1192A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1192A1.txt
  • not warrant an extension of time to complete construction. 47 C.F.R. � 1.946(e)(2)-(3). See Amendment of the Commission's Rules to Establish New Personal Communications Services, GEN Docket No. 90-314, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 9 FCC Rcd. 4957, 5019 (1994) (PCS MO&O), citing WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969). 47 C.F.R. � 1.925. Alternatively, pursuant to section 1.3, the Commission has authority to waive its rules if there is ``good cause'' to do so. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990). Extension Request at 2. Specifically, Chasetel states that it planned to use ``UTStarcom's PAS technology [which] uses low power base stations, 1900 MHz spectrum, and a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1202A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1202A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1202A1.txt
  • it submitted a complete Funding Year 4 FCC Form 471 application in compliance with the required minimum processing standards for Funding Year 4. We therefore conclude that, under these circumstances, CESA has failed to make a showing warranting relief and, therefore, its Request for Review must be denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed July 22, 2001 by Cooperative Educational Service Agency #2, Milton, Wisconsin IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Sharon Webb, Cooperative Educational Service Agency #2, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1203A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1203A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1203A1.txt
  • a detrimental impact on students and staff does not create the special circumstances that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. Therefore, we conclude that Macon has not demonstrated the existence of special circumstances warranting a deviation from our rules, and therefore, we must deny its Waiver Request ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Macon County R-I School District, Macon, Missouri, on January 2, 2002, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Harold Brown, Macon County R-I School District, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1206A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1206A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1206A1.txt
  • interest mandate can be efficiently and effectively fulfilled. Queen of Peace provides no evidence of special circumstances warranting deviation from our rule establishing the filing window deadline. We therefore conclude that Queen of Peace has failed to demonstrate special circumstances upon which its Waiver Request can be granted. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) that the Waiver Request filed by Queen of Peace Elementary School, North Arlington, New Jersey, on August 16, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from George Schlitt, Queen of Peace Church, on behalf
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1208A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1208A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1208A1.txt
  • of funding would have a detrimental impact on the school or library in question and that such impact is a special circumstance warranting a waiver of the Commission's rules. Therefore, we conclude that Tuxedo has failed to demonstrate special circumstances upon which its Waiver Request can be granted. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Tuxedo Park School, Tuxedo Park, New York, on December 13, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from James Pearson and Ann Doherty Cooke, Tuxedo Park School, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1224A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1224A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1224A1.txt
  • relevant because the deadline had already passed. Albany County offers no additional reason why it did not meet the deadline. We find that Albany County has not demonstrated the existence of any special circumstances warranting a deviation from the general rule, and, therefore, we deny its Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Albany County Public Schools, Albany County, Minnesota on August 7, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Rocky Tyler, Albany County School District 1, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1226A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1226A1.txt
  • does not create the special circumstances that warrant waiver of the Commission's rules. Therefore, we cannot give a waiver based on the premise that the library is small and well-used. We conclude that Central City has not demonstrated special circumstances upon which its Waiver Request can be granted. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Central City Public Library, Central City, Nebraska, on December 28, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Lynn Manhart, Central City Public Library, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1227A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1227A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1227A1.txt
  • Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Paul LaFreniere, Jaffrey-Rindge Cooperative School District, dated August 3, 2001 (Administrator's Decision on Waiver Request). SLD directs entities that request such waivers to appeal directly to the Commission, because it lacks authority to waive the Commission's rules even in cases supported by a showing of good cause. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (stating the Commission can waive its rules). However, because Jaffrey-Rindge does not ask for a waiver of the rules but, instead, for review of SLD's determination, we address the merits of Jaffrey-Rindge's appeal. See Request for Review. Section 54.719(c) of the Commission's rules provides that any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1228A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1228A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1228A1.txt
  • and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Chelleye Block, Karnes City Independent School District, dated August 7, 2001 (Administrator's Decision on Waiver Request). SLD directs entities that request such waivers to appeal directly to the Commission, because it lacks authority to waive the Commission's rules even in cases supported by a showing of good cause. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (stating the Commission can waive its rules). However, because Karnes does not ask for a waiver of the rules but, instead, for review of SLD's determination, we address the merits of Karnes's appeal. Request for Review. Similar material was sent to SLD as noted above. See SLD appeal letter. Karnes Form 471 (envelope containing certification and attachments); see, e.g., Request
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1229A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1229A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1229A1.txt
  • applicant who has responsibility ultimately for the timely submission of its application. We have denied waiver requests based upon an applicant's claim that it misunderstood the program rules. For these reasons, Molalla's contention that it misunderstood the rules does not warrant relief and, therefore, we deny Molalla's request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Molalla River School District, Molalla, Oregon, on July 2, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Michael Nickless, Molalla River School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1230A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1230A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1230A1.txt
  • outside the filing window, it has treated this as a request for waiver of the filing deadline and directed Mora to make this request to the Commission. Because we find that this material was timely filed, we need not address Mora's request for a waiver of the deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Mora Public Schools, Mora, Minnesota on August 7, 2001 IS REMANDED to SLD for further processing in accordance with this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Keith Lester,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1231A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1231A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1231A1.txt
  • detrimental impact on a particular school or library does not create the special circumstances that warrant waiver of the Commission's rules. Therefore, we conclude that Lane has not demonstrated the existence of any special circumstances warranting a waiver of the filing deadline, and we deny its Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Lane Education Service District, Eugene Oregon, on August 17, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Randy Trummer, Lane Education Service District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1232A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1232A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1232A1.txt
  • 20, 2000. If SLD determines that Halifax did attempt to contact SLD directly or through its state coordinator about its inability to electronically file, then Halifax's application should be treated as timely. If SLD determines the applicant did not attempt to do so, then no waiver is appropriate. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by North Carolina Office of Information Technology Services on behalf of North Carolina Department of Commerce - SIPS, Halifax County School District, on May 18, 2001, IS REMANDED to SLD for further processing in accordance with this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1234A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1234A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1234A1.txt
  • the applicant responsibility for complying with our rules and procedures. Ridgefield does not offer any explanation of why its FCC Form 471 application was filed after the filing deadline. Therefore, we conclude that Ridgefield has failed to demonstrate special circumstances upon which its Waiver Request can be granted. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Ridgefield Public Schools, Ridgefield, Connecticut, on August 24, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Division Wireline Competition Bureau On August 24, 2001, Ridgefield filed copies of its appeal letter to SLD and subsequent
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1235A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1235A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1235A1.txt
  • record to indicate that Schechter used the mail to submit a copy of the main portion of its application. Therefore, we find that Schechter did not submit that portion of the application either electronically or by mail within the filing window, and we deny Schechter's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on August 27, 2001, by Solomon Schechter School of Queens, Flushing, New York, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Susanne Felder, Solomon Schechter School of Queens, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1236A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1236A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1236A1.txt
  • that it missed the Funding Year 4 filing deadline for seven applications for discounts under the schools and libraries universal service mechanism. However, since TSBVI filed its Request for Review, SLD has granted the relief that TSBVI was seeking. Therefore, TSBVI's Request for Review is dismissed as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired, Austin, Texas on September 4, 2001, IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Craig Abbe, Texas School for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1237A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1237A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1237A1.txt
  • understand and comply with the program. The circumstances described by Tuscarora do not constitute special circumstances for purposes of our waiver standard. Therefore, we conclude that Tuscarora has not demonstrated the existence of any special circumstances warranting a deviation from our rules, and we deny its Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Tuscarora Intermediate Unit 11, McVeytown, Pennsylvania, on September 14, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Tony Payne, Tuscarora Intermediate Unit 11, to the Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1243A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1243A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1243A1.txt
  • not warrant an extension of time to complete construction. 47 C.F.R. � 1.946(e)(2)-(3). See Amendment of the Commission's Rules to Establish New Personal Communications Services, GEN Docket No. 90-314, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 9 FCC Rcd. 4957, 5019 (1994) (PCS MO&O), citing WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969). 47 C.F.R. � 1.925. Alternatively, pursuant to section 1.3, the Commission has authority to waive its rules if there is ``good cause'' to do so. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990). None of the four BTAs have a total population within the top 100 markets and all fall within the lower third of markets in the U.S.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1256A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1256A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1256A1.txt
  • the "Permitted Space Station List" for operation at the 21.5� W.L. orbital location. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this authorization does not authorize New Skies Satellites, N.V., to provide any Direct-to-Home service, Direct Broadcast Satellite service, or Digital Audio Radio Service to, from, or within the United States using the NSS-7 satellite. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, each earth station with "ALSAT" designated as a point of communication, IS GRANTED a waiver of Sections 25.202(g), 25.210(a)(1), 25.210(a)(3), 25.210(i) and 25.211(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 25.202(g), 25.210(a)(1), 25.210(a)(3), 25.211(a), and 25.210(i) for the limited purpose of communicating with NSS-7 in the conventional C-and Ku-bands, subject to the conditions set forth in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1262A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1262A1.txt
  • evidence in the official record supporting Bloomingdale's assertion that it did not receive the Funding Commitment Decision Letter. Moreover, Bloomingdale fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review as well as the request for waiver of the appeal filing period, filed on March 18, 2002, by Bloomingdale Elementary Schools, Bloomingdale, Illinois ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1271A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1271A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1271A1.txt
  • Sprint's provision of customer notification and certification to the Commission that complies with all requirements of section 64.1120(e) except the 30-day periods waived herein. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.141, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Sprint Corp, on May 24, 2002, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Margaret M. Egler, Deputy Chief Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau See 2000 Biennial Review-Review of Policies and Rules
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1287A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1287A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1287A1.txt
  • 11.987-12.023 GHz, 12.047-12.083 GHz, 12.107-12.143 GHz and 12.167-12.182 GHz. We recognize that these frequencies are fully reused in transponders on Galaxy III-C's North America beam. See PanAmSat Amendment, Exhibit 1A. Letter from Joseph A. Godles, Attorney for PanAmSat Corporation, to William F. Caton, Secretary, FCC (May 13, 2002). Id. Id. Id. Id. Id. at 2. Id. Id. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). Wait Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969); Dominion Video Satellite, Inc., Order and Authorization, 14 FCC Rcd 8182 (Int'l Bur. 1999). For example, in September 2001 when emerging from a solar eclipse, the PAS-7 satellite experienced a solar cell short-circuit resulting in a sudden, permanent
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-128A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-128A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-128A1.txt
  • Bureau, Commercial Wireless Division, at (202) 418-0920 (rarsenau@fcc.gov) or John Branscome of the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Commercial Wireless Division, at (202) 418-8205 (jbransco@fcc.gov). Action by the Chief, Commercial Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau. - FCC - Section 1.935(a) requires concurrent filing of the certification and the request to withdraw a petition to deny. 47 C.F.R. � 1.935(a). Pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the Bureau waives, on its own motion, the concurrent-filing requirement. � � � � �����PNG > �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� �� � �a�% Tf(c) U~��Uy�Ӛ�o=�c� {�YAD ���Zv�}�YAD e/�,�-�%E9 ^1�J 2�� bʆPh=f 8H�]}��`��2@ ���'����X�t�p�O � ��$��>��� -�m�``�Q(q P� ���e D �_�� p�/]b|?�O� V��Jõ tXT���e� 2)�V``� (c)}�l�tmE...bϡ gs�>o���(R)"q�Q ܆���D N
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1323A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1323A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1323A1.txt
  • specially staffed call center to call each affected customer, advising them of ATG's planned discontinuance and offering them assistance in migrating to other carriers. ATG also states that it has received intrastate discontinuance authority from both Virginia's and Maryland's regulatory bodies. One comment was filed with the Commission, but according to ATG, the customer's concerns were resolved. Pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, the Commission may grant a waiver of its rules upon a showing of ``good cause.'' Section 1.3, thus, allows the Commission to grant a waiver if special circumstances warrant a departure from the general rule, and that departure serves the public interest. We find that due to the special circumstances present here, a departure from the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1325A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1325A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1325A1.txt
  • Texas an opportunity to increase its earning and to support the provision of the services customers need and expect. At the same time, it does not permanently increase Valor Texas's CMT rates. We note that, if needed and supported by the record, we can consider additional relief in the future. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, Valor's petition for waiver of application of the X-factor under section 61.45(b)(1)(i) of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR � 61.45(b)(1)(i), IS DENIED IN PART AND GRANTED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dorothy T. Attwood Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau 47 C.F.R. �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1342A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1342A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1342A1.txt
  • extension request for the third license by separate Order. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.946, 24.843. Section 1.946(e) includes examples of specific circumstances that would not warrant an extension of time to complete construction. 47 C.F.R. � 1.946(e)(2)-(3). PCS MO&O at 5019, citing WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969). 47 C.F.R. � 1.925. Alternatively, pursuant to section 1.3, the Commission has authority to waive its rules if there is ``good cause'' to do so. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990). Our research indicates that the two BTAs are in the lower third of all BTAs in terms of population. The upper two-thirds of BTAs in terms
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1343A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1343A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1343A1.txt
  • Todd Slamowitz, counsel for Summit, dated June 6, 2002. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.946, 24.843. Section 1.946(e) includes examples of specific circumstances that would not warrant an extension of time to complete construction. 47 C.F.R. � 1.946(e)(2)-(3). PCS MO&O at 5019, citing WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969). 47 C.F.R. � 1.925. Alternatively, pursuant to section 1.3, the Commission has authority to waive its rules if there is ``good cause'' to do so. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990). Our research indicates that all but one of the six BTAs are in the lower third of all BTAs in terms of population with the sixth
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1346A6.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1346A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1346A6.txt
  • a contingency, you may access the Bidding System via the FCC Wide Area Network. Minimum Hardware and Software Requirements The following minimum hardware and software is required to use the FCC Remote Access System: CPU: Pentium 133 or above RAM: 32 MB (64 MB recommended) Monitor: VGA or above Mouse or other pointing device "! higher, with Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1. . Connecting to the FCC Network To connect to the FCC Network, you must use Dial-Up Networking. Dial-Up Networking establishes a point-to-point connection from your PC to the FCC Network. This point-to-point connection is not routed through the Internet. To access the FCC Automated Auction System, configure your dial-up network to dial 900-555-5335. (Alternatively, you can configure your dial-up network
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-136A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-136A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-136A1.txt
  • Mary could easily confirm by searching the posted FCC Form 470s in the Funding Year 2 group, Saint Mary should have understood that its FCC Form 470 would not be valid for Funding Year 3. We conclude that a waiver of the competitive bidding requirements is not appropriate. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Saint Mary School, Putnam, Connecticut, on March 22, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Phyllis A. Hickey, Saint Mary School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed March
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1377A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1377A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1377A1.txt
  • would obviate the need to include advanced services within the price cap indexes and rates, constitutes special circumstances, and such circumstances outweigh any harm to competition. Ordering Clauses 10. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 204(a), and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, section 61.42(g) of the Commission's rules IS WAIVED for services transferred from VADI to Verizon, only with respect to Verizon's 2002 Annual Access Tariff Filing requirements under section 61.43 of the Commission's rules. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tamara L. Preiss Chief, Policy Pricing Division Wireline Competition Bureau The Verizon Telephone
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1403A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1403A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1403A1.txt
  • 7, 2000, IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, and the application IS REMANDED to SLD for further action consistent with this opinion. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1-5, 201-205, 254, and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154, 201-205, 254, and 303(r), and section 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that section 54.501(c)(2) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.501(c)(2), IS WAIVED for the Year 1 applicant specified above. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Jeanette M. Halldorson, Shawnee Library System, to Federal Communications Commission, filed June 7, 2000 (Request for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1405A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1405A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1405A1.txt
  • and other representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Fairfield fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review as well as the request for waiver of the appeal filing period, filed on March 13, 2002, by Fairfield Public Schools, Fairfield, Connecticut ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1406A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1406A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1406A1.txt
  • Service Administrative Company, filed October 16, 2001 (Request for Administrator Review). Year 4 Certification Rejection Letter at 1. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Keith Rafaniello, Plymouth Board of Education, dated November 5, 2001 (Administrator's Decision on Appeal). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Request for Review. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). Year 4 Certification Rejection Letter at 1. In re Mary Ann Salvatoriello, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 4705, 4707-08, para. 22 (1991) (citing Office of Personnel Management v. Richmond, 497 U.S. 1046 (1990)). See Request for Review by Anderson School Staatsburg, Federal-State
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1407A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1407A1.txt
  • other representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Here, Bangor fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Professional Information Networks, Bangor, Maine, on April 24, 2002, IS DISMISSED, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1419A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1419A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1419A1.txt
  • commenters contend that it is more appropriate for the Commission to modify the assessment methodology for all affected contributors through the Commission's pending Contribution Methodology rulemaking. Discussion As discussed in greater detail below, we deny AT&T's request for waiver of the Commission's universal service contribution rules and conclude that AT&T has not demonstrated good cause to justify the waiver. Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules provides that waiver of a rule may be granted upon ``good cause shown.'' Commission rules are presumed valid, however, and an applicant for waiver bears a heavy burden. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule ``only if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule and such deviation will serve the public
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1425A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1425A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1425A1.txt
  • as harmful to its clients. Thus, we conclude that this grant of waiver is in the overall best interests of the affected consumers. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 226 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 226, and the authority delegated under sections 0.141, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, 1.3, the petition for clarification and waiver by T-NETIX, Inc. on February 22, 2002 IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Margaret M. Egler, Deputy Chief, Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau T-NETIX, Inc., Petition for Clarification and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1431A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1431A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1431A1.txt
  • its first satellite at this time as well. Failure to meet this condition of the waiver will render Astrolink's authorization null and void. IV. CONCLUSION AND ORDERING CLAUSES 9. Based on the foregoing, we grant Astrolink, on our own motion, a waiver of the construction commencement milestone set forth in its authorization. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, a waiver of Astrolink International LLC's January 2002 construction commencement milestone is GRANTED. 10. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Astrolink International LLC must enter into a non-contingent satellite construction contract for the construction of its first satellite by January 2003. 11. This Order is issued under delegated authority, pursuant to Section 0.261
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1441A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1441A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1441A1.txt
  • opening bid for the license. The defined increment will be calculated as follows. Presuming, for example, that the percentage being used is 20 percent, we will multiply the standing high bid (or, if no standing high bid exists for the particular license, the minimum opening bid) by 1.2. (If the percentage being used is 30 percent, we would multiply by 1.3, etc.) The product will be rounded as follows: amounts below $1,000 will be rounded to the nearest $10; amounts above $1,000 but below $10,000 will be rounded to the nearest $100; and amounts above $10,000 will be rounded to the nearest $1,000. The defined increment then will be determined by subtracting the standing high bid (or, if applicable, the minimum
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1458A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1458A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1458A1.txt
  • procedures. The applicant ultimately bears the responsibility of completing the relevant forms and submitting them within the established deadline if the applicant wishes to be considered with other in-window applicants. We therefore conclude that Duncanville has not demonstrated special circumstances upon which its Waiver Request can be granted. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Duncanville ISD, Duncanville, Texas, on May 15, 2001, is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Andrew W. Berning, Duncanville Independent School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed May
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-145A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-145A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-145A1.txt
  • Additionally, as was the case in Naperville, the record reflects that Hudson's application, after corrections performed by SLD during its initial review, is otherwise substantially complete. Therefore, we grant a waiver of the filing window and remand the application to SLD for processing pursuant to the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91. 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Hudson Falls Central School, Hudson Falls, New York, on June 29, 2000 IS GRANTED and this application is REMANDED to the Schools and Libraries Division for further consideration as provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1460A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1460A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1460A1.txt
  • Bureau at 888-203-0733. Lack of Internet access therefore also provides no grounds for relief. Finally, Gladwin pleads that the library is poor and deserving of funding. However, the assertion of need does not create the special circumstances or particular facts that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Gladwin County Library (Gladwin), Gladwin, Michigan, on September 10, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from David Volk, Gladwin County Library, to Federal Communications Commission, filed September
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1462A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1462A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1462A1.txt
  • adhering strictly to its filing deadlines. In order for the program to work efficiently, applicants must assume responsibility for timely submission of their appeals to SLD if they wish their appeals to be considered on the merits. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Reavis Math/Science Specialty School, Chicago, Illinois, on May 13, 2002, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1463A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1463A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1463A1.txt
  • weighs in favor of correcting the error committed by the Administrator so that Sandhill's applications may be processed without further delay and considered on the merits. Therefore, we direct the Administrator to process both of the Funding Year 2 FCC Forms 471 at issue consistent with this Order. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.702(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91. 0.291, 1.3, and 54.702(c) that the Request for Guidance filed by the Administrator with respect to Sandhill Regional Library System, Rockingham, North Carolina, on May 21, 2001, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Administrator IS DIRECTED to take further action consistent with this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1464A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1464A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1464A1.txt
  • unreasonable, as well as the Commission's and the Bureau's long-standing policy of ensuring that applicants for non-recurring services are not penalized for delays that are not within their control. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1-4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 U.S.C. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) that the request for waiver of section 54.507(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.507(d), filed by the Buffalo City School District with the Schools and Libraries Division of the Universal Service Administrative Company on May 16, 2002, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1471A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1471A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1471A1.txt
  • not warrant an extension of time to complete construction. 47 C.F.R. � 1.946(e)(2)-(3). See Amendment of the Commission's Rules to Establish New Personal Communications Services, GEN Docket No. 90-314, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 9 FCC Rcd. 4957, 5019 (1994), citing WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969). 47 C.F.R. � 1.925. Alternatively, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the Commission has authority to waive its rules if there is ``good cause'' to do so. See also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990). Extension Request at 1. In cases where an extension of time has been granted, the licensee has often taken ``significant steps'' toward constructing its network, including, at a minimum, ordering
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1496A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1496A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1496A1.txt
  • earth station in this band will not restrict the growth or coordination of terrestrial microwave paths due to interference considerations. Second, the remote location and high elevation of PacAmTel's earth station makes interference with other Commission licensees highly unlikely. Therefore, we conclude that waiver will not undermine the policy objective of our rule. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that PacAmTel's request for waiver of Section 25.205 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 25.205, IS GRANTED. This Order is issued pursuant to Section 0.261 of the Commission's rules on delegated authority, 47 C.F.R. � 0.261, and is effective upon release. Petitions for reconsideration under Section 1.106 or applications for review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-149A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-149A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-149A1.txt
  • relevant rules and procedures. In order for the program to work efficiently, the applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of correct application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Bonesteel-Fairfax fails to demonstrate a sufficient basis for waiving the Commission's filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Bonesteel-Fairfax High School, Bonesteel, South Dakota, on August 3, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Loris J. Lindskov, Bonesteel-Fairfax High School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed August
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1512A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1512A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1512A1.txt
  • certification and attachments, was posted by the last day of the window. As noted above, the Block 6 certification page and Item 21 attachments were postmarked on January 22, 2001, and were therefore ineligible to be considered within the filing window. Therefore, we deny the Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Desert Sands Unified School District, La Quinta, California, on August 22, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from George Araya, Desert Sands Unified School District, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1513A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1513A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1513A1.txt
  • a denial of an application may have a detrimental impact on a particular school or library does not create the special circumstances that warrant waiver of the Commission's rules. Therefore, we find that Jennings has failed to demonstrate good cause necessary to justify waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Jennings City Library, Jennings, Kansas, on August 14, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Sonya A. Gillespie, Jennings City Library, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1514A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1514A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1514A1.txt
  • wishes to be considered within the window. An applicant must further take responsibility for the actions of those employees or agents to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely and proper requests for discounts on its behalf. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Minneapolis Public Schools on behalf of Minneapolis Special School District No. 1, Minneapolis, Minnesota, on September 10, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Carol Johnson,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1515A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1515A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1515A1.txt
  • Carmel does not address whether it mailed its certification and attachments by the filing deadline. The evidence in the record demonstrates that the Mount Carmel did not file its certification and attachments within the filing window for Funding Year 4. Therefore, Mount Carmel's Request for Review is denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Mount Carmel School, Saipan, Northern Marianas Islands, on September 4, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Linze McGilvrey, Mount Carmel School, to the Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1516A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1516A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1516A1.txt
  • of complying with all relevant rules and procedures. In order for the program to work efficiently, the applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Randolph School District, Randolph, Vermont, on September 10, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Stephen Metcalf, Randolph School District, to the Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1517A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1517A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1517A1.txt
  • Year 4 is whether the entire application, complete with certification and attachments, was posted by the last day of the window. St. Mary's Block 6 certification page and Item 21 attachments were postmarked on January 19, 2001, and was therefore ineligible to be considered within the filing window. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by St. Mary's School-Rosebank, Staten Island, New York, on September 17, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Virginia Savarese, St. Mary's School-Rosebank, to the Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1518A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1518A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1518A1.txt
  • the assertion that a denial of an application may have a detrimental impact on a particular school or library does not create the special circumstances that warrant waiver of the Commission's rules. Therefore, San Benito has failed to demonstrate good cause to justify waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by San Benito Literacy Center, San Benito, Texas, on September 19, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Ron Rogers, San Benito Literacy Center, to the Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1519A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1519A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1519A1.txt
  • and comply with the program's rules and procedures. Sangerville does not offer any reasons why a waiver of the Commission's rules should be granted. Therefore, we conclude that Sangerville has failed to demonstrate a sufficient basis for a waiver of the deadline, and we deny its waiver request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Sangerville Public Library, Sangerville, Maine, on September 12, 2001, and its request for waiver of the Funding Year 4 filing deadline ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1520A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1520A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1520A1.txt
  • Forms 471 must be postmarked no later than the close of the filing window. The particular facts of this case do not rise to the level of special circumstances required for a deviation from the general rule. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by School Administration District 53, Pittsfield, Maine, on August 15, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Richard K. Woodbury, School Administration District 53 (Pittsfield), to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1521A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1521A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1521A1.txt
  • Forms 471 must be postmarked no later than the close of the filing window. The particular facts of this case do not rise to the level of special circumstances required for a deviation from the general rule. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Wayzata Public Schools, Plymouth, Minnesota, on September 12, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Mark Manning, Wayzata Public Schools, to the Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1522A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1522A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1522A1.txt
  • assertion that a denial of an application may have a detrimental impact on a particular school or library does not create the special circumstances that warrant waiver of the Commission's rules. Therefore, we find that Wilmington has not demonstrated special circumstances warranting a waiver of the Commission's rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Wilmington Public Schools, Wilmington, Massachusetts, on February 27, 2002, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Louise Leland, Wilmington Public Schools, to the Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1540A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1540A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1540A1.txt
  • the National Association of the Deaf, CC Docket No. 94-102 (filed May 9, 2002). Id. at 5-6. TDI and NAD urge the Commission to deny the petition and specify that if Amarillo and High Plains are not in compliance by June 30, 2002, they will be subject to enforcement action. Id. at 8. Amarillo Reply at 2. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. 47 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(3)(ii). See Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (citing WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969)). See, e.g., Cellular Mobile Systems of St. Cloud Petition at 3; Missouri RSA #5 Partnership Petition at 3; Wireless Communications Venture Petition at 3. See AWS Petition at 2. , supra.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1540A1_Erratum.doc
  • the National Association of the Deaf, CC Docket No. 94-102 (filed May 9, 2002). Id. at 5-6. TDI and NAD urge the Commission to deny the petition and specify that if Amarillo and High Plains are not in compliance by June 30, 2002, they will be subject to enforcement action. Id. at 8. Amarillo Reply at 2. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. 47 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(3)(ii). See Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (citing WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969)). See, e.g., Cellular Mobile Systems of St. Cloud Petition at 3; Missouri RSA #5 Partnership Petition at 3; Wireless Communications Venture Petition at 3. See AWS Petition at 2. , supra.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1545A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1545A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1545A1.txt
  • interest expressed in providing an additional local aural transmission service to Eldorado, Texas, we will allot Channel 293A to that community, as requested. 3. As stated in the Notice, Channel 293A can be allotted to Eldorado, in conformity with the minimum distance separation requirements of Section 73.207(b)(1) of the Commission's Rules provided the transmitter site therefor is located at least 1.3 kilometers (0.8 miles) southwest of the community, utilizing reference coordinates 30-51-14 NL and 100-36-43 WL. Additionally, as Eldorado is located within 320 kilometers (199 miles) of the U.S.-Mexico border, concurrence of the Mexican government to the proposed allotment of Channel 293A at that community has been requested, but not yet received. Rather than delay the opportunity to file an application
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1563A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1563A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1563A1.txt
  • its directors, and member companies while the Commission continues to review how it should modify the election processes for NECA's Board of Directors. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), and 201-205 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), (j), and 201-205, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of the annual election requirements in section 69.602 filed by the National Exchange Carrier Association, IS GRANTED, as described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau See 2000 Biennial Regulatory Review-Requirements Governing the NECA Board of Directors under Section
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1588A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1588A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1588A1.txt
  • grounds for relief, since any potential applicant can obtain forms and opening and closing dates for the application window by calling SLD's Client Service Bureau at 888-203-0733. The assertion of financial need does not meet the requirement of special circumstances that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Requests filed by Deer Lodge, Holy Ghost, and Seton on April 10, February 28, and March 6, 2002, respectively, ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau 47 C.F.R. �� 54.502, 54.503. Letter from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1611A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1611A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1611A1.txt
  • applications may have a detrimental impact on schools and libraries does not create the special circumstances or particular facts that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. We therefore deny the Request for Review and affirm SLD for substantially the reasons stated in the Administrator's Decision on Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Atchison Public Schools, Atchison, Kansas, on July 23, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Dr. Corbin Witt, Atchison Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1613A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1613A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1613A1.txt
  • CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, FCC 01-376 (rel. Dec. 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com. Car. Bur. rel. Dec. 28, 2001 and Jan. 4, 2002). 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). See Request for Review by Anderson School Staatsburg, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Changes to the Board of Directors of the National Exchange Carrier Association, File No. SLD-133664, CC Docket Nos. 96-45 and 97-21, Order, 15 FCC Rcd 25610 (Com. Car. Bur. rel. Nov. 24, 2000),
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1615A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1615A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1615A1.txt
  • filing window resulting from the need to file a corrected version after a minimum processing standards rejection is not a special circumstance warranting waiver of the window. We therefore deny the Request for Review and affirm SLD for substantially the reasons stated in the Administrator's Decision on Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by St. Mary's School, East Dubuque, Illinois, on July 16, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Mary Nauman, St. Mary's School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1616A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1616A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1616A1.txt
  • filing window resulting from the need to file a corrected version after a minimum processing standards rejection is not a special circumstance warranting waiver of the window. We therefore deny the Request for Review and affirm SLD for substantially the reasons stated in the Administrator's Decision on Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by the Town of North Providence School Department, North Providence, Rhode Island, on July 31, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Wayne Riendeau, Town of North
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1629A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1629A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1629A1.txt
  • response to the Notice. 2. We believe that the public interest would be served by the allotment of Channel 271A at Big Wells, Texas, as it will provide the community with its first local FM broadcast service. Channel 271A can be allotted to Big Wells in compliance with the Commission's minimum distance separation requirements with a site restriction 2.1 kilometers (1.3 miles) east of the community. The site restriction will prevent a conflict with Station KUVA, Channel 272A, Uvalde, Texas. Although Mexican concurrence has been requested for the allotment of Channel 271A at Big Wells, notification has not been received. Therefore, operation with the facilities specified for Big Wells herein is subject to modification, suspension, or termination without right to hearing,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1664A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1664A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1664A1.txt
  • SureWest's provision of customer notification and certification to the Commission that complies with all requirements of section 64.1120(e) except the 30-day periods waived herein. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.141, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, 1.3, the waiver request filed by SureWest Communications, on July 10, 2002, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Margaret M. Egler, Deputy Chief Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau See 2000 Biennial Review-Review of Policies and Rules
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-166A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-166A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-166A1.txt
  • We grant an extension of time until March 21, 2002 for submitting comments on Verizon's section 272(d) biennial audit report. An extension of time will afford the Bureau an opportunity to evaluate and consider the issues raised, while preserving the public's ability to comment on the audit report. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.201-0.204, 1.3, 53.209-53.213, the comment period for the Verizon section 272(d) biennial audit report IS EXTENDED to March 21, 2002. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Kenneth P. Moran Chief, Accounting Safeguards Division, CCB Accounting Safeguards Under the Telecommunications Act of 1996: Section 272(d) Biennial Audit Procedures, CC Docket No. 96-150, Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 02-1 (rel. Jan. 10, 2002). (...continued from previous page)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1672A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1672A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1672A1.txt
  • to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Here, ERIE 2 BOCES fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by ERIE 2 - Board of Cooperative Educational Services, Fredonia, New York, on May 24, 2002, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1673A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1673A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1673A1.txt
  • application may have a detrimental impact on a particular school or library does not create the special circumstances that warrant waiver of the Commission's rules. Therefore, we conclude that Lineville-Clio has not demonstrated a sufficient basis for a waiver of the deadline, and we deny its Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Lineville-Clio Community School District, Lineville, Iowa, on January 30, 2002, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Robert McCurdy, Lineville-Clio Community School District, to the Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1674A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1674A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1674A1.txt
  • its behalf, even when such persons are away from the office on medical leave or otherwise incapacitated. Here, St. Patrick fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on June 5, 2002, by St. Patrick School, White Lake, Michigan, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Daniel Marsh and Linda Meese, St. Patrick School, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1675A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1675A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1675A1.txt
  • those employees, consultants and other representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely applications on its behalf. Here, Weyauwega-Fremont fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed May 22, 2002, by Weyauwega-Fremont High School, Weyauwega, Wisconsin, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Gerald Pardun, Weyauwega-Fremont High School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed May 22, 2002
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1680A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1680A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1680A1.txt
  • that we would treat the request as a request for a waiver. Comments from Tom J. Abraham, United Airlines, submitted by e-mail March 20, 2002. Id. at 1. Id. Id. See WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969); Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990); see also 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. 47 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(3). The Commission generally defers to the FAA as expert agency for air safety. See, e.g., Streamlining the Commission's Antenna Structure Clearance Procedure, Memorandum Opinion and Order and Order on Reconsideration, WT Docket No. 95-5, 15 FCC Rcd 8676, 8679 � 5 (2000); City of New York Municipal Broadcasting System, Decision, 91 FCC 2d 635, 654 �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1747A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1747A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1747A1.txt
  • which the caller is situated. BellSouth and Verizon may thus offer the services notwithstanding the general ban on BOC provision of interLATA services contained in section 271(a). ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4, 10, 201-205, 271-272 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154, 160, 201-205, 271-272, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that BellSouth's petition for a waiver of the Computer III CEI requirements for the provision of nonlocal operator-assisted reverse directory services and nonlocal electronic reverse directory services, and for the provision of the expanded reverse search capabilities described herein in connection with its direct access to directory assistance service;
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1779A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1779A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1779A1.txt
  • the baseline or at any point 3 m above ground level at the border of another administration; The calculation of the likely power flux-density produced at any point 36m above sea level at the baseline or at any point 3 m above ground level at the border of another administration taking into account the site shielding and other mitigation techniques 1.3 The interference potential of a GSO FSS earth station transmitter must be considered case by case; the power flux-density produced by each GSO FSS earth station transmitter into a maritime radiolocation receiver at a point 36m above the baseline or into a land-based mobile radiolocation receiver at a point 3m above ground level at the border of another administration shall
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1782A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1782A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1782A1.txt
  • if there are unused Funding Year 2000 funds remaining after the second quarter 2003, such funds will be used in subsequent funding years, not Funding Year 2000. Thus, additional funds will not be made available to Funding Year 2000 applicants and we therefore deny Houston's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Houston Independent School District on April 18, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Request for Review of the Decision of the Universal Service Administrator by Houston Independent
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1789A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1789A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1789A1.txt
  • the Commission ordered the filing window deadline waived ``for the applicants that meet the standards set forth in this Order.'' We conclude that the Administrator's request to grant waivers for Franklin and Henry is consistent with the principle and scope of the Year 3 Server Failure Order. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.702(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. ��0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.702(c) that the Request for Waiver by the Universal Service Administrative Company concerning Franklin Township Community School Corporation and Henry County Schools filed on November 27, 2001 IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Administrator IS DIRECTED to take further actions consistent
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-180A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-180A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-180A1.txt
  • request with respect to SLD application number 234939, Alisal Union may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. For these reasons, with respect to SLD application number 234939, we dismiss Alisal Union's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Alisal Union School District, Salinas, California October 12, 2001, IS DENIED IN PART and IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE IN PART. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Glenn Della Maggiore,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-181A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-181A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-181A1.txt
  • representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Here, All Saints' fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by All Saints' Elementary School, Brooklyn, New York on December 28, 2001, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-182A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-182A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-182A1.txt
  • other representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Here, Dixon fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Dixon Public Library, Dixon, Illinois November 30, 2001, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-186A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-186A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-186A1.txt
  • respect to SLD application numbers 248651 and 248803, Strathmore may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. For these reasons, with respect to SLD application numbers 248651 and 248803, we dismiss Strathmore's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Strathmore Union High School, Strathmore, California on September 20, 2001, IS DENIED IN PART and IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE IN PART. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Vernon Snodderly,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1871A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1871A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1871A1.txt
  • a resubmission period to make minor corrections. During each filing period, submitted applications may be updated and amended multiple times until the filing deadline. Software Requirements Applicants will need to meet the following minimum software requirements: Web Browser, either of the following: Microsoft(R) Internet Explorer 4.0 or higher (recommended). Your browser must have either Microsoft VM or Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1 installed. eader 5.0 or higher (available at http://www.adobe.com) If you wish to use the download feature on the Search Results page, you will need a .tar file extraction utility, e.g., Winzip (available at http://www.winzip.com) or Pkzip for Windows (available at http://www.pkware.com/shareware). Submitting FCC Form 175 Applications You can submit FCC Form 175 applications electronically via the Internet. Start your web
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-188A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-188A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-188A1.txt
  • representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Here, Westport Edison fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Westport Edison Academy, Kansas City, Missouri on January 3, 2002, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1890A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1890A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1890A1.txt
  • filing deadline for the conversion of these EUCL informal complaints into formal complaints. Because this extension will facilitate the possible settlement of these numerous claims, we are satisfied that our action today serves the public interest. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 208, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and the authority delegated by sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.011 and 0.311, that section 1.718(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.718(a), IS HEREBY WAIVED, with regard to the IPP EUCL informal complaints described herein and the deadline for the conversion and filing of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-189A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-189A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-189A1.txt
  • other representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Here, Wheeler fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Wheeler Independent School District, Wheeler, Texas on December 10, 2001, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1933A6.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1933A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1933A6.txt
  • a contingency, you may access the Bidding System via the FCC Wide Area Network. Minimum Hardware and Software Requirements The following minimum hardware and software is required to use the FCC Remote Access System: CPU: Pentium 133 or above RAM: 32 MB (64 MB recommended) Monitor: VGA or above Mouse or other pointing device "! higher, with Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1. . Connecting to the FCC Network To connect to the FCC Network, you must use Dial-Up Networking. Dial-Up Networking establishes a point-to-point connection from your PC to the FCC Network. This point-to-point connection is not routed through the Internet. To access the FCC Automated Auction System, configure your dial-up network to dial 900-555-5335. (Alternatively, you can configure your dial-up network
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1941A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1941A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1941A1.txt
  • inequitable, unduly burdensome or contrary to the public interest, or that it has no reasonable alternative. We therefore grant Southwest Central's Reconsideration Petition and reverse our decision in our Nov. 8 Order. V. ORDERING CLAUSES 13. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 405 of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 405, and Sections 1.3 and 1.106 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.106, the Reconsideration Petition, filed on December 6, 2001, by Southwest Central IS GRANTED. 14. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the license for Station WPTQ259, Willow Brook, Illinois, SHALL BE MODIFIED consistent with this Order on Reconsideration and the applicable Commission rules. 15. This action is taken under designated authority
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1971A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1971A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1971A1.txt
  • 3-4. Dickenson Order, para. 9. Petition for Reconsideration at 2-4. See George E. Cameron Jr. Communications (Kroq) Burbank, California For Renewal Of License Royce International Broadcasting Company Burbank, California Baker-Smith Communications, Inc. Burbank, California For Construction Permits, 93 F.C.C.2d 789 (1983). Petition for Reconsideration at 6. Petition for Reconsideration at 2-4. Petition for Reconsideration at 4-6. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (appeals court vacating a Commission decision to grant a waiver in a licensing issue, because it was arbitrary and capricious). 02-1971 02-1971 " � � � � ` �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1973A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1973A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1973A1.txt
  • submission of its appeal to SLD if it wishes its appeal to be considered on the merits. Here, Inland Lakes fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Inland Lakes Schools, Indian River, Michigan, on June 28, 2002, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1974A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1974A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1974A1.txt
  • SLD reviews and processes thousands of applications each year, and therefore it is administratively necessary to place on the applicant responsibility for complying with the program's rules and procedures. We therefore find that Quincy has failed to demonstrate special circumstances upon which its Waiver Request can be granted. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Quincy School District 172, Bloomingdale, Illinois, on August 13, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Jerry Steinberg, Telesolutions Consultants, on behalf of Quincy School District 172,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1975A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1975A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1975A1.txt
  • unreasonable, as well as the Commission's and the Bureau's long-standing policy of ensuring that applicants for non-recurring services are not penalized for delays that are not within their control. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1-4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 U.S.C. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) that the request for waiver of section 54.507(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.507(d), filed by the Chicago Public Schools on June 10, 2002, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Funding Year 2001 deadline for installation of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1981A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1981A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1981A1.txt
  • CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, FCC 01-376 (rel. Dec. 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com. Car. Bur. rel. Dec. 28, 2001 and Jan. 4, 2002). 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Request for Review at 1. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). Funding Commitment Decision Letter at 2. In re Mary Ann Salvatoriello, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 4705, 4707-08, para. 22 (1991) (citing Office of Personnel Management v. Richmond, 497 U.S. 1046). See Request for Review by Anderson School Staatsburg, Federal-State
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1983A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1983A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1983A1.txt
  • Oso filed outside the filing window, it does not have priority status over any requests filed within the filing window. Therefore, we conclude that West Oso has not demonstrated the existence of any special circumstances warranting a deviation from our rules, and therefore, we deny its Waiver Request ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by West Oso Independent School District, Corpus Christi, Texas, on January 18, 2002, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Ruben Corkill, West Oso ISD, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1986A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1986A1.txt
  • to the general rule. A rule, therefore, may be waived where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. In the instant case, we conclude that Ellensburg fails to demonstrate special circumstances warranting a deviation from our rules, and therefore we deny its Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed January 3, 2002, by Ellensburg School District No. 401, Ellensburg, Washington, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert, Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from James Baker, Ellensburg School District No. 401, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-19A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-19A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-19A1.txt
  • 64.1601(b), while allowing universities and hospitals that have responsibility for the safety of their residents to better meet those obligations. We believe that the likelihood that CPN information will be unlawfully disclosed is minimized, and hence that Metrocare's concerns, as well as callers' legitimate expectations of privacy, are adequately addressed. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91 and 0.291, that INSIGHT 100, Inc.'s petition for waiver of section 64.1601(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 64.1601(b), IS GRANTED to the extent described in this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2010A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2010A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2010A1.txt
  • timely manner. We also have held that the assertion of financial need does not meet the requirement of special circumstances that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. We conclude that the circumstances presented by Overton and Chrisman are insufficient to warrant a deviation from the general rule. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Requests filed by Chrisman Public Library, Chrisman, Illinois, and Overton Public School District, Omaha, Nebraska, on January 16, and April 16, 2002, respectively, ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2065A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2065A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2065A1.txt
  • of Michigan, Public Notice, DA 97-127 (Jan. 17, 1997); Revised Procedures for Bell Operating Company Applications Under Section 271 of the Communications Act, Public Notice, 13 FCC Rcd 17457 (Sept. 19, 1997); Updated Filing Requirements for Bell Operating Company Applications Under Section 271 of the Communications Act, Public Notice, DA-99-1994 (Sept. 28, 1999) (collectively ``271 Procedural Public Notices''). See section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Ameritech Michigan Order at 20575, para. 57; Application of Bell Atlantic New York for Authorization Under Section 271 of the Communications Act To Provide In-Region, InterLATA Service in the State of New York, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 3953, 3968, para. 34 (1999). See 271 Procedural Public Notices. See Public
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2070A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2070A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2070A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that CTC Communications, Inc.'s Consent Motion For Extension of Time To File Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-210A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-210A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-210A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of AT&T Corp. to Extend Time in Which to Convert Informal Complaints to Formal Complaints and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2118A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2118A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2118A1.txt
  • not warrant an extension of time to complete construction. 47 C.F.R. � 1.946(e)(2)-(3). See Amendment of the Commission's Rules to Establish New Personal Communications Services, GEN Docket No. 90-314, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 9 FCC Rcd 4957, 5019 (1994) (PCS MO&O), citing WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969). 47 C.F.R. � 1.925. Alternatively, pursuant to section 1.3, the Commission has authority to waive its rules if there is ``good cause'' to do so. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990). See Extension Request at 2-3, 7. See Extension Request at 4, August Amendment to Extension Request at 2. See Extension Request at 3-4. Extension Request at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2129A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2129A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2129A1.txt
  • of Michigan, Public Notice, DA 97-127 (Jan. 17, 1997); Revised Procedures for Bell Operating Company Applications Under Section 271 of the Communications Act, Public Notice, 13 FCC Rcd 17457 (Sept. 19, 1997); Updated Filing Requirements for Bell Operating Company Applications Under Section 271 of the Communications Act, Public Notice, DA-99-1994 (Sept. 28, 1999) (collectively ``271 Procedural Public Notices''). See section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Ameritech Michigan Order at 20575, para. 57; Application of Bell Atlantic New York for Authorization Under Section 271 of the Communications Act To Provide In-Region, InterLATA Service in the State of New York, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 3953, 3968, para. 34 (1999). See 271 Procedural Public Notices. See Public
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2146A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2146A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2146A1.txt
  • licensee commence construction of at least one satellite by January 31, 2002 is also prescribed by a Commission rule. Consequently, in requesting postponement of the January 31, 2002 milestone deadline, Motorola is effectively asking not only for a modification of the terms of the Millennium license but also for a limited waiver of the pertinent requirement of Section 25.145(f). Section 1.3 of the rules provides that waivers may be granted when good cause is shown. According to criteria delineated by the Court of Appeals, however, a waiver is appropriate only when the Commission finds, in light of special circumstances presented in the case at hand, that granting such relief would not undermine the underlying purpose of the rule requirement in question
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2153A3.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2153A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2153A3.txt
  • 271 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, To Provide In Region, InterLATA Services in Michigan, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 20543, 20570, para. 49 (1997)(Ameritech Michigan Order); Updated Filing Requirements for Bell Operating Company Applications Under Section 271 of the Communications Act, Public Notice, DA 01- 734 (CCB rel. Mar. 23, 2001). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See SWBT Kansas/Oklahoma Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 6247-50, paras. 21-27; Ameritech Michigan Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 20571-76, paras. 49-59; Application of Bell Atlantic New York for Authorization Under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-Region, InterLATA Service in the State of New York, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 3953, 3968-69, paras. 34-37 (1999). See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-218A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-218A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-218A1.txt
  • Alpine County Unified School District, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Changes to the Board of Directors of the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., File No. NEC.471.01-24-00.5400004, CC Docket Nos. 96-45 and 97-21, Order, DA 02-75 (Acc. Pol. Div. rel. January 14, 2002) and vacates that order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the following applicants SHALL SUBMIT to SLD, postmarked within 60 days of the date of the release of this Order, any such evidence as required by the terms of this Order concerning the date of the filing of their applications: Alpine County Unified School District, Markleeville, California, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2204A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2204A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2204A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of Complainants For Extension of Time In Which To Convert Informal Complaints To Formal Complaint and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2240A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2240A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2240A1.txt
  • strictly to its filing deadlines. In order for the program to work efficiently, the applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its appeals to SLD if it wishes its appeals to be considered on the merits. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by The Baltimore Academy, Baltimore, Maryland, on June 26, 2002, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2241A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2241A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2241A1.txt
  • that is inconsistent with the advice provided by the employee, particularly where relief is contrary to a rule. Thus, Brandon fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Brandon School, Natick, Massachusetts, on June 13, 2002, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2243A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2243A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2243A1.txt
  • is inconsistent with the advice provided by the employee, particularly where relief is contrary to a rule. Thus, Graydon Manor fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Graydon Manor Day School, Sterling, Virginia, on June 25, 2002, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2245A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2245A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2245A1.txt
  • Funding Commitment Decision Letter on July 23, 2001. Merely stating that a letter was not received at the address provided to SLD and to which prior correspondence had been successfully mailed is insufficient grounds for granting relief. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review as well as the request for waiver of the appeal filing period, filed on October 15, 2001, by Round Lake Area Schools District #116, Round Lake, Illinois ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2247A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2247A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2247A1.txt
  • Specifically, St. John's requests that the deadline be extended for Funding Request Number (FRN) 439209. Upon our review of the record, however, we find that SLD approved St. John's request to extend the invoicing deadline for FRN 439209. Accordingly, we dismiss St. John's Request for Waiver as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed June 7, 2002, by St. John's County School District, St. Augustine, Florida, IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Frank Clark, St. John's County School District,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2248A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2248A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2248A1.txt
  • Funding Request Numbers (FRNs) 407384, 408001, 408250, 408342, and 408648. Upon our review of the record, however, we find that SLD approved St. Theresa's request to extend the invoicing deadline for FRNs 407384, 408001, 408250, 408342, and 408648. Accordingly, we dismiss St. Theresa's Request for Waiver as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed June 5, 2002, by St. Theresa of Avila Regional School, Gonzales, Louisiana, IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Bonita Picou and Jay Sullivan, St. Theresa
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2249A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2249A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2249A1.txt
  • inconsistent with the advice provided by the employee, particularly where relief is contrary to a rule. Thus, West Ottawa fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to the Commission. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on July 1, 2002, by West Ottawa Public Schools, Holland, Michigan, IS DIMISSED and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal with the Commission IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2253A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2253A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2253A1.txt
  • to be considered within the window. Applicants that wait until the last minute before submitting their applications risk untimely filing. Here, Scottsdale fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Scottsdale Horizons School, Scottsdale, Arizona, on March 6, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Judy White, Scottsdale Horizons School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed March 6,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2260A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2260A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2260A1.txt
  • on tariff filings. We, therefore, conclude that good cause exists to grant a waiver of section 69.3(e)(11) to the Acquiring Companies. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254 and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze as codified in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Dickey Rural Telephone Cooperative and Dickey Rural Access, Inc., Polar Telecommunications, Inc., Red River Rural Telephone Association and Red River Telecom, Inc. and Citizens Telecommunications Company
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-227A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-227A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-227A1.txt
  • that the failure of NWLS to receive its requested discounts for internal connections would cause it hardship. Thus, we find that NWLS has not demonstrated the special circumstances or particular facts that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules of priority. Therefore, we deny NWLS's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Northern Waters Library Service on April 12, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Jay Moynihan, Northern Waters Library Service, Ashland, Wisconsin, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2300A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2300A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2300A1.txt
  • the jurisdiction of the Virginia Commission in the Global NAPs/Verizon interconnection arbitration proceeding in Virginia pursuant to section 252(e)(5). We reject Verizon's contention that Global NAPs's petition should be dismissed for failure to provide an accompanying affidavit as required by section 51.803(a)(1) of the Commission's rules. We waive section 51.803(a)(1) in this case upon our own motion pursuant to section 1.3 of our rules. We find that special circumstances present in this case warrant deviation from the general rule requiring a supporting affidavit. In establishing section 51.803, the Commission held that requiring detailed petitions, supported by affidavit, will help the Commission decide whether it should assume jurisdiction based on section 252(e)(5), whereas allowing less detailed petitions to be filed will increase
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2314A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2314A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2314A1.txt
  • address MN PCS's request, we will interpret the extension request as effectively a request for waiver of the timing component of the broadband PCS construction rule. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.946, 24.843. Section 1.946(e) also states specific circumstances that would not warrant an extension of time to complete construction. 47 C.F.R. � 1.946(e)(2)-(3). 47 C.F.R. � 1.925. Alternatively, pursuant to section 1.3, the Commission has authority to waive its rules if there is ``good cause'' to do so. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990); WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969). See Amendment of the Commission's Rules to Establish New Personal Communications Services, GEN Docket No. 90-314,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2340A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2340A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2340A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of Complainants For Extension of Time In Which To Convert Informal Complaints To Formal Complaint and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2347A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2347A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2347A1.txt
  • and notify applicants of errors prior to the close of the filing window. Instead, the burden of ensuring that complete and accurate information is provided on the correct forms properly rests with applicants themselves. Therefore, we uphold the Administrator's Decisions on Appeal and deny Bienville's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed December 5, 2001, by Bienville Parish School Board, Arcadia, Louisiana, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from William Britt, Bienville Parish School Board, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2356A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2356A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2356A1.txt
  • Sprint-Tennessee's provision of customer notification and certification to the Commission that complies with all requirements of section 64.1120(e) except the 30-day periods waived herein. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.141, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Sprint-Florida, Incorporated and United Telephone-Southeast, Incorporated on September 13, 2002, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Margaret M. Egler, Deputy Chief Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau See 2000 Biennial Review-Review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.txt
  • by [Recommendation ITU-R BO.1213]. 1.2 For earth station antennas in the fixed-satellite service with diameters greater than 240 cm, the gain of the side lobes is given by Recommendation ITU-R S.580-5, with 29-25log ( side-lobe envelope, complemented in the main lobe by Annex III to Appendix 8, which is equivalent to Section 3 of Annex 3 to Appendix 7 (WRC-2000). 1.3 For the broadcasting-satellite service and fixed-satellite service earth stations an antenna efficiency of 65% was used at a freqeuncy of 11.7 GHz. 2 Antenna sizes and noise temperatures The range of antenna sizes and associated noise temperatures considered for the protection of the fixed-satellite service and the broadcasting-satellite service are given in the following table: Receive earth station antenna diameter
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2363A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2363A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2363A1.txt
  • thousands of applications that SLD must review and process each funding year, we believe it administratively appropriate for SLD to require applicants to adhere strictly to its filing deadlines and requirements. Weathersfield has failed to demonstrate the merits of its Request for Review. We therefore deny Weathersfield's request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed February 19, 2002 by Weathersfield Local Schools, Mineral Ridge, Ohio IS DISMISSED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Weathersfield Local Schools, Mineral Ridge,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2416A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2416A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2416A1.txt
  • Specifically, Red Clay requests that the deadline be extended for Funding Request Number (FRN) 430711. Upon our review of the record, however, we find that SLD approved Red Clay's request to extend the invoicing deadline for FRN 430711. Accordingly, we dismiss Red Clay's Request for Waiver as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed May 20, 2002, by Red Clay School District, Dover, Delaware, IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Kay R. Buck, Red Clay School District, Dover, Delaware,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2418A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2418A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2418A1.txt
  • District requests that the deadline be extended for Funding Request Number (FRN) 353235. Upon our review of the record, however, we find that SLD approved Twin Rivers District's request to extend the invoicing deadline for FRN 353235. Accordingly, we dismiss Twin Rivers District's Request for Waiver as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed May 10, 2002, by Twin Rivers District Public Library, Colona, Illinois, IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Christine Rugh, Twin Rivers District Public Library, Colona,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2427A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2427A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2427A1.txt
  • not warrant an extension of time to complete construction. 47 C.F.R. � 1.946(e)(2)-(3). See Amendment of the Commission's Rules to Establish New Personal Communications Services, GEN Docket No. 90-314, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 9 FCC Rcd 4957, 5019 (1994) (PCS MO&O), citing WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969). 47 C.F.R. � 1.925. Alternatively, pursuant to section 1.3, the Commission has authority to waive its rules if there is ``good cause'' to do so. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990). See Extension Request at 8. See id. at 4, 8. See id. at 4. Id. at 8. Id. at 4. See id. at 8. See id.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2458A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2458A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2458A1.txt
  • document shall be filed on the next business day. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106(f), 1.4(j). See Stay Request. Grace Period Reconsideration Petition. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.946(c), 1.955(a)(2). 47 C.F.R. � 1.946. Section 1.946(e) also states specific circumstances that would not warrant an extension of time to complete construction. 47 C.F.R. � 1.946(e)(2)-(3). 47 C.F.R. � 1.925. Alternatively, pursuant to section 1.3, the Commission has authority to waive its rules if there is ``good cause'' to do so. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990). See Order at 14031, n. 12. This estimate was calculated using the population and square kilometers of the Basic Trading Area of San Juan, Puerto Rico
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2485A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2485A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2485A1.txt
  • points because of the difficulty in demonstrating that at least fifty percent of the settled U.S.-billed traffic between the United States and the above-named foreign points is being settled at or below the relevant benchmark rates as established in In the Matter of International Settlement Rates, IB Docket 96-261, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 19,806 (1997). Pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, AT&T states that there is good cause to waive for the above-named foreign points, the requirement in Section 63.16 of the Commission's rules and requests ISR designation for the above-named foreign points. Interested parties may file comments regarding or petitions to deny the applications no later than October 31, 2002. Oppositions or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2511A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2511A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2511A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Waiver of Commission Rule 1.718(a) IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section 1.718 of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2512A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2512A2.txt
  • cut- through dial digit extraction, in-band and out-of-band signaling, and party add, drop and hold. 1.2 "Classified Information" means any information that has been determined pursuant to Executive Order 12958, or any predecessor or successor order, or the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, or any statute that succeeds or amends the Atomic Energy Act, to require protection against unauthorized disclosure. 1.3 "Control" and "Controls" means the power, direct or indirect, whether or not exercised, and whether or not exercised or exercisable through the ownership of a majority or a dominant minority of the total outstanding voting securities of an entity, or by proxy voting, contractual arrangements, or other means, to determine, direct, or decide matters affecting an entity; in particular, but
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2525A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2525A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2525A1.txt
  • 271 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, To Provide In Region, InterLATA Services in Michigan, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 20543, 20570, para. 49 (1997)(Ameritech Michigan Order); Updated Filing Requirements for Bell Operating Company Applications Under Section 271 of the Communications Act, Public Notice, DA 01- 734 (CCB rel. Mar. 23, 2001). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See SWBT Kansas/Oklahoma Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 6247-50, paras. 21-27; Ameritech Michigan Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 20571-76, paras. 49-59; Application of Bell Atlantic New York for Authorization Under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-Region, InterLATA Service in the State of New York, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 3953, 3968-69, paras. 34-37 (1999), aff'd,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2529A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2529A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2529A1.txt
  • to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Here, Chicago Public Schools fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Chicago Public Schools, Chicago, Illinois, on August 27, 2002, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2531A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2531A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2531A1.txt
  • required application or otherwise fail to follow program rules, run the risk that their applications may not be considered within the filing window. We therefore conclude that, under these circumstances, Des Moines has failed to make a showing warranting relief and, therefore, its Waiver Request must be denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed April 2, 2002 by Des Moines Public Schools, Des Moines, Iowa, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Greg Davis, Des Moines Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, dated April
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2534A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2534A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2534A1.txt
  • other representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Here, Johnson fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Johnson Elementary School, Johnson, Vermont on October 15, 2001, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2535A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2535A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2535A1.txt
  • to our analysis. Staffing problems do not relieve applicants of their responsibility to comply with our rules and procedures. Therefore, we conclude that Hancock County has not demonstrated the existence of special circumstances sufficient to warrant a deviation from our rules, and therefore, we deny its Waiver Request ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Hancock County Public Library, Sneedville, Tennessee, on July 30, 2002, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Floyd W. Rhea, Hancock County Public Library, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2536A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2536A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2536A1.txt
  • on its behalf, even when such persons are away from the office on medical leave or otherwise incapacitated. Here, Homer-Center fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Homer-Center School District, Homer City, Pennsylvania, on August 9, 2002, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2538A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2538A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2538A1.txt
  • for the timely submission of its application. Neither staffing problems nor misunderstanding relieves applicants of their responsibility to understand the program and comply with its rules and procedures. Therefore, we conclude that Lincoln County has failed to demonstrate special circumstances upon which its Waiver Request can be granted. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed April 30, 2002, by Lincoln County Board of Education, Hamlin, West Virginia, IS DISMISSED and the Request for Waiver is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Electronic mail from Birdie
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2539A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2539A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2539A1.txt
  • deadlines. In order for the program to work efficiently, the applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its appeal to SLD if it wishes its appeal to be considered on the merits. We therefore find no basis for waiving the deadline for filing its appeal with SLD. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Maria L. Varisco-Rogers Charter School, Inc., Newark, New Jersey, on August 26, 2002, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2541A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2541A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2541A1.txt
  • building with a new superintendent and a new person handling the E-Rate application process.'' However, we have consistently held that personnel disruptions, employee medical conditions, or employee confusion or misunderstanding about SLD rules and deadlines do not rise to the level of special circumstances required for a waiver. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Requests filed by Nederland Independent School District, Nederland, Texas, and Wells Central School District, Wells, New York, on March 1 and March 15, 2002, respectively, ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2543A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2543A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2543A1.txt
  • submission of its appeals if it wishes them to be considered on the merits. Here, Pajaro Valley fails to present good cause why it could not timely file its appeals. We, therefore, find no basis for waiving the deadline for the filing of Pajaro Valley's appeal with SLD. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review and Waiver filed on February 28 and May 6, 2002, by Pajaro Valley Unified School District, Watsonville, California, as well as the request to waive the deadline for filing its appeal with SLD ARE DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2552A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2552A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2552A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of Complainants For Extension of Time In Which To Convert Informal Complaints To Formal Complaint and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2559A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2559A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2559A1.txt
  • Midwestern's provision of customer notification and certification to the Commission that complies with all requirements of section 64.1120(e) except the 30-day periods waived herein. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.141, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Midwestern Telecommunications, Inc., on September 23, 2002, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Margaret M. Egler, Deputy Chief Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau See 2000 Biennial Review-Review of Policies and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2566A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2566A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2566A1.txt
  • of an automatic extension provided under section 54.507(d) of the Commission's rules. The fourth criterion applies to program compliance funding investigations, and does not apply here. Because Lynwood's situation does not fit within any of the four criteria under section 54.507(d) of the Commission's rules, we must address Lynwood's request as a request for a waiver under 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Waiver is appropriate if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, and such deviation would better serve the public interest than strict adherence to the general rule. We conclude that special circumstances exist to justify a waiver of section 54.507(d) of the Commission's rules. The record indicates that Lynwood will not be able to meet the current deadline
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2576A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2576A1.pdf
  • Indeed, while AT&T did mention in one affidavit its desire to use non-Verizon loop qualification tools for stand-alone loops as well as in the line splitting context, its advocacy presented the question only with respect to line splitting. Most importantly, AT&T did not oppose Verizon's proposed contract language in section 11.2.12.2 that it now seeks to modify. Schedule 11.2.17, Section 1.3.2, Charges for Use of Non-Verizon Loop Qualification Tools Finally, AT&T and Verizon cannot agree on language to implement the Bureau's ruling that, if it is technically feasible and if AT&T is willing to pay, Verizon must modify its operations support systems (OSS) to permit AT&T to use non-Verizon loop qualification tools for line splitting. Verizon seeks to add language that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-259A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-259A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-259A1.txt
  • filing deadline for the conversion of these EUCL informal complaints into formal complaints. Because this extension will facilitate the possible settlement of these numerous claims, we are satisfied that our action today serves the public interest. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 208, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and the authority delegated by sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.011 and 0.311, that section 1.718(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.718(a), IS HEREBY WAIVED, with regard to the IPP EUCL informal complaints described herein and the deadline for the conversion and filing of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2619A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2619A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2619A1.txt
  • tariff filings. We therefore conclude that good cause exists to grant Norway a waiver of section 69.3(e)(11) of the Commission's rules. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze as codified in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Norway Rural Telephone Company and Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc. d/b/a Iowa Telecom on January 28, 2002, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2717A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2717A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2717A1.txt
  • and the Commission's rules. Discussion. We find that grant of a limited waiver to permit Access 220 to engage in band manager operations pursuant to the 220 MHz authorizations it currently holds would further the public interest by facilitating the Commission's stated objectives for the 220 MHz spectrum and is warranted under the waiver standards established by sections 1.925 and 1.3 of the Commission's rules. We condition grant of this waiver on Access 220's compliance with the requirements imposed on 700 MHz Guard Band Manager licensees, with the specific exceptions set out below. These conditions mirror the terms of operation established by the Commission for 700 MHz Guard Band Manager licensees when it established the service. The Commission has made clear
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2758A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2758A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2758A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Fourth Consent Motion of Complainants For Extension of Time In Which To Convert Informal Complaints To Formal Complaint and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-294A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-294A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-294A1.txt
  • e-mailed to Commission staff and Qualex on February 4, 2002. Thus, it was publicly available through Qualex as if it had been received at the filing location on that date. It is important to obtain a full and complete record in this proceeding, and acceptance of Eagle's Petition is consistent with this objective. Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Acceptance of Petition filed by Eagle is hereby GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION W. Kenneth Ferree Chief, Cable Services Bureau See Echostar Communications Corporation, General Motors Corporation, And Hughes Electronics Corporation Seek FCC Consent For A Proposed Transfer Of Control, CS Docket No. 01-348, Public Notice,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-295A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-295A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-295A1.txt
  • e-mailed to Commission staff and Qualex on February 4, 2002. Thus, it was publicly available through Qualex as if it had been received at the filing location on that date. It is important to obtain a full and complete record in this proceeding, and acceptance of Brunson's Petition is consistent with this objective. Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Acceptance of Petition filed by Brunson is hereby GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION W. Kenneth Ferree Chief, Cable Services Bureau See Echostar Communications Corporation, General Motors Corporation, And Hughes Electronics Corporation Seek FCC Consent For A Proposed Transfer Of Control, CS Docket No. 01-348, Public Notice,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2972A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2972A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2972A1.txt
  • submission of its appeals if it wishes them to be considered on the merits. Here, Blessed Sacrament fails to present good cause why it could not timely file its appeals. We, therefore, find no basis for waiving the deadline for the filing of Blessed Sacrament's appeal with SLD. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Blessed Sacrament Catholic School, Newark, New Jersey on October 8, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Scott DeCarolis, Blessed Sacrament Catholic School, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3013A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3013A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3013A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Fifth Consent Motion of Complainants For Extension of Time In Which To Convert Informal Complaints To Formal Complaint and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3040A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3040A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3040A1.txt
  • not warrant an extension of time to complete construction. 47 C.F.R. � 1.946(e)(2)-(3). See Amendment of the Commission's Rules to Establish New Personal Communications Services, GEN Docket No. 90-314, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 9 FCC Rcd 4957, 5019 (1994) (PCS MO&O), citing WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969). 47 C.F.R. � 1.925. Alternatively, pursuant to section 1.3, the Commission has authority to waive its rules if there is ``good cause'' to do so. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990). Brainerd Request at 2-6; Grand Forks Request at 2-6. See File No. 0000017125, filed July 23, 1999, as amended on October 21, 1999, October 22, 1999,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3041A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3041A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3041A1.txt
  • bidding period to run before filing the FCC Form 471. Additional information on the web site clearly indicated that FCC Form 471 must be filed within a certain filing window. We conclude that CCS has failed to demonstrate special circumstances upon which its Waiver Request can be granted. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Center City School, Salt Lake City, Utah on May 15, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from James Ramsay, Center City School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3043A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3043A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3043A1.txt
  • did not know the Commission's rules and procedures, and that the funding is needed. As noted above, we have not found either need of the funds or employee misunderstanding as sufficient grounds for a waiver of the Commission rules in the past. We therefore deny Pottsgrove's Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Requests filed by Duncan Public Library, Duncan, Arizona, on April 16, 2002; Mid Peninsula School, Rock, Michigan, on April 23, 2002; Neches Independent School District, Neches, Texas, on April 22, 2002; and Pottsgrove School District, Pottstown, Pennsylvania, on April 24, 2002 ARE DENIED.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3044A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3044A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3044A1.txt
  • the Commission's rules and procedures. Furthermore, we have rejected arguments based upon claims that SLD staff provided the incorrect information to applicants. After reviewing the material before us, we conclude that High Bridge has failed to demonstrate the special circumstances upon which its Waiver Request can be granted. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by High Bridge Board of Education, High Bridge, New Jersey, on May 20, 2002, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from, Anthony Juskiewicz, High Bridge Board of Education, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3045A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3045A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3045A1.txt
  • best suits them for the application process. Instead, the program has one main filing window, and all who would apply for discounts through this program must apply within that time-frame. We conclude that Kearney has failed to demonstrate special circumstances upon which its Waiver Request can be granted. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Kearney Public Schools, Kearney, Nebraska, on June 13, 2002, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Karl Yeutter, Kearney Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed June 13,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3046A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3046A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3046A1.txt
  • meet the filing window resulting from the need to file a corrected application after a minimum processing standards rejection is not a special circumstance warranting waiver of the window. We conclude that the circumstances presented by Marin County are insufficient to warrant a deviation from the general rule. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Marin County Office of Education, San Rafael, California, on June 3, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Mary Jane Burke, Mari County Office of Education, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3048A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3048A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3048A1.txt
  • filing window. Furthermore, a special pop-up notice appeared for online filers at the start of the online application process, and again after the applicant clicked on the ``Submit'' button. We conclude that South Side has failed to demonstrate special circumstances upon which its Waiver Request can be granted. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by South Side Area School District, Hookstown, Pennsylvania, on April 29, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Lori P. Byron, South Side Area School District, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3061A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3061A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3061A1.txt
  • make use of the services does not meet the requirement of special circumstances that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. Therefore, we conclude that Tripp has not demonstrated the existence of special circumstances warranting a deviation from our rules, and therefore, we must deny its Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Tripp County Library, Winner, South Dakota, on March 6, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Sandra Hansen, Tripp County Library, to Federal Communications Commission, filed March
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-306A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-306A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-306A1.txt
  • of its own error or misunderstanding of the rules. Subiaco has not offered any reason other than misunderstanding of the rules for why the deadline should be waived in this case. We therefore conclude that Subiaco has not demonstrated special circumstances upon which to grant its Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Timmie Geels, Subiaco Academy, Subiaco, Arkansas, on January 23, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Timmie Geels, Subiaco Academy, to Federal Communications Commission, filed January 23, 2001
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3106A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3106A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3106A1.txt
  • Denton's provision of customer notification and certification to the Commission that complies with all requirements of section 64.1120(e) except the 30-day periods waived herein. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.141, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Denton Telecom Partners I, LP, on October 29, 2002, and as amended on November 8, 2002, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Margaret M. Egler, Deputy Chief Consumer & Governmental
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3153A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3153A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3153A1.txt
  • a resubmission period to make minor corrections. During each filing period, submitted applications may be updated and amended multiple times until the filing deadline. Software Requirements Applicants will need to meet the following minimum software requirements: Web Browser, either of the following: Microsoft(R) Internet Explorer 4.0 or higher (recommended). Your browser must have either Microsoft VM or Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1 installed. eader 5.0 or higher (available at http://www.adobe.com) If you wish to use the download feature on the Search Results page, you will need a .tar file extraction utility, e.g., Winzip (available at http://www.winzip.com) or Pkzip for Windows (available at http://www.pkware.com/shareware). Submitting FCC Form 175 Applications You can submit FCC Form 175 applications electronically via the Internet. Start your web
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3161A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3161A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3161A1.txt
  • Memorial's inability to complete an on-line application is not a circumstance excusing the omission in its manually-filed application. Further, we have repeatedly found that the financial need of applicants is not a circumstance warranting waiver of the window. We therefore deny the Request for Review and affirm SLD. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Wm. H. & Lucy F. Rand Memorial Library, Troy, Vermont, on April 8, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Nancy Allen, Wm. H. & Lucy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3163A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3163A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3163A1.txt
  • authority to waive regulatory requirements, it does not have authority to waive a requirement imposed by statute. The October 28, 2001 deadline for CIPA certifications in Funding Year 2001 is statutory. Because the October 28, 2001 deadline is established by statute, we are without authority to waive it. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed by St. Helen School, Howard Beach, New York on April 12, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Wireless Competition Bureau Letter from Anne Badalamenti, St. Helen School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed April 12, 2002
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3182A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3182A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3182A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Sixth Consent Motion of Complainants For Extension of Time In Which To Convert Informal Complaints To Formal Complaint and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3214A6.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3214A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3214A6.txt
  • via the FCC Wide Area Network To participate as a bidder in an FCC auction or view the auction's announcements and round results, the FCC recommends accessing the FCC Automated Auction System via the Internet. As a contingency, you may access the FCC Automated Auction System via the FCC Wide Area Network. Minimum Hardware and Software Requirements "! -In Version 1.3.1. . In addition, users accessing the FCC Auctions Bidding System via the FCC's Wide Area Network will need: Modem: 28.8 Kbps Hayes(c) compatible modem or faster (56.6 Kbps recommended) Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) Dialer: Use the Dial-Up Networking feature included with the operating system Connecting to the FCC Wide Area Network To connect to the FCC Wide Area Network, you must
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-323A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-323A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-323A1.txt
  • disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Partial Withdrawal of Informal Complaint and Petition for Additional Extension of Time filed by Indiana Paging Network, Inc. IS GRANTED. 8. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3254A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3254A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3254A1.txt
  • even when such persons are away from the office on medical leave or otherwise incapacitated. Here, St. Mary High School fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed on September 16, 2002, by St. Mary High School, Jersey City, New Jersey, as well as the request to waive the deadline for filing its appeal with SLD ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3255A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3255A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3255A1.txt
  • is inconsistent with the advice provided by the employee, particularly where relief is contrary to a rule. Thus, Sullins fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to the FCC. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Sullins Academy, Bristol, Virginia, on October 3, 2002, IS DISMISSED, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3299A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3299A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3299A1.txt
  • that Verizon has complied with the terms of this waiver, and should include a copy of the notice it sent to the affected subscribers. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.141, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Verizon New England, on November 22, 2002, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Margaret M. Egler, Deputy Chief Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau See 2000 Biennial Review-Review of Policies and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3305A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3305A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3305A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Seventh Consent Motion of Complainants For Extension of Time In Which To Convert Informal Complaints To Formal Complaint and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3316A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3316A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3316A1.txt
  • These waivers will allow RFB Cellular to begin receiving support as of November 20, 2001, the date RFB Cellular received its ETC designation. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.314(d)(1) of the Commission's rules, filed by RFB Cellular, Inc. on January 10, 2002, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3342A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3342A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3342A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3343A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3343A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3343A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3344A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3344A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3344A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3345A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3345A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3345A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3346A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3346A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3346A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3366A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3366A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3366A1.txt
  • Finally, East Carroll asserts that the CIPA deadline should not be imposed on applicants seeking only discounts on telecommunications services. To the extent that East Carroll seeks a waiver on this basis, we reject the argument because, as noted above, East Carroll also received discounts on Internet access. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed by East Carroll Parish School Board, Lake Providence, Louisiana on January 28, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Facsimile from Helen Millikin, East Carol Parish School Board, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3367A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3367A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3367A1.txt
  • the effective date of the statute. Because Republic County was receiving discounts on Internet access, and was therefore subject to the October 28, 2001 deadline imposed by the CIPA statute, we are without authority to waive that deadline in this case, and the Waiver Request must be denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Republic County Unified School District No. 427, Belleville, Kansas, on May 20, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireless Competition Bureau Letter from Larry Lysell, Republic Unified School District No. 427,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3368A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3368A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3368A1.txt
  • support for which the acquired access lines currently are eligible, and will prevent it from making needed upgrades to the acquired access lines. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Blackduck Telephone Company and Arvig Telephone Company on February 6, 2001, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3370A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3370A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3370A1.txt
  • not warrant an extension of time to complete construction. 47 C.F.R. � 1.946(e)(2)-(3). See Amendment of the Commission's Rules to Establish New Personal Communications Services, GEN Docket No. 90-314, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 9 FCC Rcd 4957, 5019 (1994) (PCS MO&O), citing WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969). 47 C.F.R. � 1.925. Alternatively, pursuant to section 1.3, the Commission has authority to waive its rules if there is ``good cause'' to do so. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990). Houghton Request at 1-2. Id. at 2. Houghton Amendment at 1. Houghton Request at 2. Id. Houghton Request at 4-5. Id. at 4. Id. at 5;
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3401A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3401A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3401A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3406A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3406A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3406A1.txt
  • able to receive high-cost support for the third and fourth quarters of calendar year 2002. At issue here is whether or not the Connecticut Department is entitled to a waiver of the October 1, 2001 filing deadline to ensure that rural carriers in Connecticut will also receive high-cost support for the first and second quarters of calendar year 2002. Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules provides that waiver of a rule may be granted upon ``good cause shown.'' Commission rules are presumed valid, however, and an applicant for waiver bears a heavy burden. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule ``only if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule and such deviation will serve the public
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3414A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3414A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3414A1.txt
  • complaint proceedings, and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3, 1.716-18, and 1.720-1.736 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.716-18, 1.720-36, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Joint Motion to Convert Case IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-341A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-341A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-341A1.txt
  • other representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Here, Addison fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Addison Northeast Supervisory Union, Bristol, Vermont, on January 23, 2002, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-342A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-342A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-342A1.txt
  • other representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Here, Granger fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeals to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadlines. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed by Granger School District No. 204, Granger, Washington on December 11, 2001, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file these appeals ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-343A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-343A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-343A1.txt
  • other representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Here, Mulberry fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Mulberry Elementary School District, Brawley, California, on January 9, 2002, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-344A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-344A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-344A1.txt
  • to work efficiently, the applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Newtown fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore must deny the Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Newtown Public Schools, Newtown, Connecticut, on March 30, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from John R. Reed, Newtown Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed March 30,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3467A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3467A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3467A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Eighth Consent Motion of Complainants For Extension of Time In Which To Convert Informal Complaints To Formal Complaint and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3471A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3471A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3471A1.txt
  • 17 FCC Rcd 339 (Com. Car. Bur. rel. December 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com. Car. Bur. rel. December 28, 2001 and January 4, 2002). 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Request for Review. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). See Request for Review by Anderson School Staatsburg, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Changes to the Board of Directors of the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., File No. SLD-133664, CC Docket Nos. 96-45 and 97-21, Order, 15 FCC Rcd 25610 (Com. Car. Bur.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3474A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3474A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3474A1.txt
  • the Form 499-Q and Form 499-A Instructions in reaching its conclusion and did not require guidance from the Commission. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1, 4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 254, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by ABC Cellular on June 17, 2002 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Order SHALL BE transmitted to the Universal Service Administrative Company. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Request for Review by ABC Cellular Corporation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-347A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-347A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-347A1.txt
  • to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Here, St. Francis Xavier fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by St. Francis Xavier School, Acushnet, Massachusetts, on December 11, 2001, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3490A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3490A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3490A1.txt
  • PLACED on the "Permitted Space Station List," subject to the conditions set forth in this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Telesat Canada IS GRANTED a waiver of Section 25.210(a)(3) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 25.210(a)(3), for the purpose of communicating with Anik F2 in the conventional C- and Ku-bands. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, ALSAT-designated earth stations ARE GRANTED a waiver of Sections 25.114(c)(13) and (17), 25.137(b) and 25.140 of our rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 25.114(c)(13) and (17), 25.137(b) and 25.140 of our rules, for the purpose described and to the extent set forth in the Order above. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.2
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3492A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3492A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3492A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of Complainant For Extension of Time In Which To Convert Informal Complaint To Formal Complaint and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3509A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3509A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3509A1.txt
  • 17 FCC Rcd 339 (Com. Car. Bur. rel. Dec. 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com. Car. Bur. rel. Dec. 28, 2001 and Jan. 4, 2002). 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Request for Review at 1. Id. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). See Request for Review by Anderson School Staatsburg, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Changes to the Board of Directors of the National Exchange Carrier Association, File No. SLD-133664, CC Docket Nos. 96-45 and 97-21, Order, 15 FCC Rcd 25610 (Com.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3510A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3510A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3510A1.txt
  • seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. Because the Midlothian Independent's Request for Administrator Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, we affirm the Administrator's Decision on Appeal and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed on November 12, 2002, by Midlothian Independent School District, Midlothian, Texas, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Kirk Paschall, Midlothian Independent School District, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-352A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-352A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-352A1.txt
  • representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Here, Melrose Area fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Melrose Area High School, Melrose, Minnesota on January 17, 2002, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-354A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-354A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-354A1.txt
  • work efficiently, the Commission has found that it cannot accept unsupported arguments that mailed letters were never received. Here, Telfair fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Telfair County School District, McRae, Georgia on December 3, 2001, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3553A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3553A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3553A1.txt
  • public interest will be served by allowing Kerrville to remain under rate-of-return regulation until the Commission completes its review of the ``all-or-nothing'' rule. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 61.41, filed by Valor Telecommunications, LLC IS GRANTED, to the extent described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey Carlisle Senior Deputy Chief Wireline Competition Bureau See 47 C.F.R. � 61.41; Valor Telecommunications, LLC Petition for Waiver of Section
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3560A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3560A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3560A1.txt
  • on the FCC Form 175, will assist the Commission in monitoring the participation of these ``designated entities'' in its auctions. Exhibit F -- Miscellaneous Information: Applicants wishing to submit additional information should include it in Exhibit F. Waivers: Applicants requesting waiver of any rules must submit a statement of reasons sufficient to justify the waiver sought. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925. Certifications: Applicants should carefully read the list of certifications on the FCC Form 175. These certifications help to ensure a fair and competitive auction and require, among other things, disclosure to the Commission of certain information on applicant ownership and agreements or arrangements concerning the auction. Submission of an FCC Form 175 application constitutes a representation by the certifying
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-356A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-356A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-356A1.txt
  • Rcd 20543, 20570, para. 49 (1997), writ of mandamus issued sub nom. Iowa Utils. Bd. v. FCC, No. 96-3321 (8th Cir. Jan. 22, 1998) (Ameritech Michigan Order); Updated Filing Requirements for Bell Operating Company Applications Under Section 271 of the Communications Act, Public Notice, DA 01-734 (CCB rel. Mar. 23, 2001) (March 23 Procedural Public Notice). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See SWBT Kansas/Oklahoma Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 6247-50, paras. 21-27; Ameritech Michigan Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 20571-76, paras. 49-59; Application of Bell Atlantic New York for Authorization Under Section 271 of the Communications Act To Provide In-Region, InterLATA Service in the State of New York, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 3953, 3968-69, paras. 34-37 (1999). See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-35A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-35A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-35A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of AT&T Corp. to Extend Time in Which to Convert Informal Complaints to Formal Complaints and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-360A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-360A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-360A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of AT&T Corp. to Extend Time in Which to Convert Informal Complaints to Formal Complaints and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-369A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-369A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-369A1.txt
  • thirty (30) days of the release of this Public Notice. Action by the Chief, Policy and Rules Branch, Commercial Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau. For further information, contact Gary A. Oshinsky, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Commercial Wireless Division, Policy and Rules Branch, at (202) 418-7167. Under Section 1.935(a), Venus's Certification should have been filed concurrently with its Request. Pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, we waive, on our own motion, the concurrent filing requirement. Venus filed a Consolidated Reply to Oppositions to Petitions to Hold in Abeyance and a single Reply to the Opposition to Petition for Reconsideration. See Consolidated Reply to Oppositions to Petitions to Hold in Abeyance filed by Venus on February 21, 2001 and Reply to the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-372A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-372A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-372A1.txt
  • supplemental report consistent with the Commission's denial of Verizon's request. We grant an extension of time until April 8, 2002 for submitting comments on Verizon's section 272(d) biennial audit report. This extension will afford parties 60 days to review and comment on the totality of the audit report. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.201-0.204, 1.3, 53.209-53.213, the comment period for the Verizon section 272(d) biennial audit report IS EXTENDED to April 8, 2002. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Timothy A. Peterson Acting Chief, Accounting Safeguards Division, CCB Accounting Safeguards Under the Telecommunications Act of 1996: Section 272(d) Biennial Audit Procedures, CC Docket No. 96-150, Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 02-1 (rel. Jan. 10, 2002). (...continued from previous
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-388A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-388A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-388A1.txt
  • submission of its appeal to SLD if it wishes its appeal to be considered on the merits. Here, East Alton fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by East Alton-Wood River Community High School, Wood River, Illinois on January 2, 2002, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-395A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-395A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-395A1.txt
  • from the standards established in the Permanent Extension Order. Because we deny Cleveland's Waiver Request, we do not reach the issue of whether to grant a limited waiver of the Commission's competitive bidding rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i) and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, the Request for Waiver and Extension of Time filed by Cleveland Municipal School District, Cleveland, Ohio, on September 28, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Nathaniel Hawthorne on behalf of Cleveland Municipal School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-412A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-412A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-412A1.txt
  • restructure itself. According to Alma, the restructured company would have the same shareholders, directors and management, provide the same local exchange services, serve the same customers, use the same billing name, charge the same rates, and operate under the same terms. No comments were timely filed with the Commission regarding either the waiver request or the application. Pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, the Commission may grant a waiver of its rules upon a showing of ``good cause.'' As determined by the U.S Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, section 1.3 allows the Commission to grant a waiver if special circumstances warrant a departure form the general rule and that departure serves the public interest. We find
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-427A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-427A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-427A1.txt
  • subject of the original waiver request would qualify as ``rural.'' The Pennsylvania PUC asserts that these arguments are based on new evidence that was not previously available to it. Finally, the Pennsylvania PUC urges the Bureau to reconsider the Commission's conclusion that only ``common carriers'' are eligible to receive universal service support under section 254(h)(1). II. DISCUSSION Pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, the Commission may grant waiver of a rule if the party can demonstrate good cause. As interpreted by the courts, this requires that a petitioner show that ``special circumstances warrant a deviation from general rule and such a deviation will serve the public interest.'' The burden, therefore, falls on the petitioner, not the Commission, to demonstrate
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-432A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-432A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-432A1.txt
  • Dockets No. 96-45 and 97-21, Order, DA 01-1412 (Com. Car. Bur. rel. June 13, 2001) (Flint Memorial Library). We note that, if the application were viewed as a Funding Year 3 application, it would also be denied because it was filed after January 19, 2000, the date on which the Funding Year 3 filing window closed. >. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1158 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972) (WAIT Radio). Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular); see also WAIT Radio, 897 F.2d at 1159 (stating that the Commission may take into account considerations of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-433A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-433A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-433A1.txt
  • submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window, and must assume responsibility for the actions of those to whom it delegates authority for program filings. Here, Springdale fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Springdale Public Schools, Springdale, Arkansas, on May 14, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Jim Rollins, Springdale Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed May 14, 2001
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-434A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-434A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-434A1.txt
  • fewer than 14 digits. We find that SLD rejected St. Edward's application because no FCC Form 470 Application number was listed. Thus, in accordance with our decision in the Pediatric Library Order, we remand St. Edward's application to SLD for further processing in accordance with this order. 4. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by the St. Edward on the Lake School, on April 2, 2001, IS GRANTED, and its application is REMANDED to SLD for further processing. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Helen
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-436A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-436A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-436A1.txt
  • proceeding to examine its rules governing the schools and libraries universal service support mechanism in order to ensure its continued efficient and effective operation. E-Rate Central is free to raise this proposal in the context of the rulemaking. We therefore deny this part of the Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by E-Rate Central, Plandome, New York, on behalf of St. Patrick's Academy, Catskill, New York, on March 26, 2001, IS DISMISSED in part and DENIED in part. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Request for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-447A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-447A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-447A1.txt
  • address MN PCS's request, we will interpret the extension request as effectively a request for waiver of the timing component of the broadband PCS construction rule. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.946, 24.843. Section 1.946(e) also states specific circumstances that would not warrant an extension of time to complete construction. 47 C.F.R. � 1.946(e)(2)-(3). 47 C.F.R. � 1.925. Alternatively, pursuant to section 1.3, the Commission has authority to waive its rules if there is ``good cause'' to do so. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990); WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969). See Amendment of the Commission's Rules to Establish New Personal Communications Services, GEN Docket No. 90-314,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-450A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-450A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-450A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of AT&T Corp. to Extend Time in Which to Convert Other Informal Complaints to Formal Complaints and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-462A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-462A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-462A1.txt
  • the Commission were to grant automatic authority on March 22, 2002, the agreement's earliest closing date would be March 31, 2002. KMC explains that this delay will cost it approximately five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) in additional interest charges, and that it cannot predict what impact such delay will have on its future ability to provide service. Pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, the Commission may grant a waiver of its rules upon a showing of ``good cause.'' Section 1.3, thus, allows the Commission to grant a waiver if special circumstances warrant a departure from the general rule, and that departure serves the public interest. We find that due to the special circumstances present here, departure from the general
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-470A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-470A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-470A1.txt
  • on the FCC Form 175, will assist the Commission in monitoring the participation of these ``designated entities'' in its auctions. Exhibit F -- Miscellaneous Information: Applicants wishing to submit additional information should include it in Exhibit F. Waivers: Applicants requesting waiver of any rules must submit a statement of reasons sufficient to justify the waiver sought. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925. Certifications: Applicants should carefully read the list of certifications on the FCC Form 175. These certifications help to ensure a fair and competitive auction and require, among other things, disclosure to the Commission of certain information on applicant ownership and agreements or arrangements concerning the auction. Submission of an FCC Form 175 application constitutes a representation by the certifying
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-477A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-477A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-477A1.txt
  • representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Here, West Harrison fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by West Harrison Community School District, Mondamin, Iowa on January 8, 2002, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-479A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-479A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-479A1.txt
  • would then have to grant similar relief to other entities that made similar mistakes, which would in turn increase administrative burdens for SLD. We therefore conclude that, under these circumstances, Edgewood has failed to make a showing warranting relief and that its Request for Review must be denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review, filed by Edgewood Independent School District, San Antonio, Texas, on July 24, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from David Ochoa, Edgewood Independent School District, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-480A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-480A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-480A1.txt
  • window. Instead, the burden of ensuring that complete and accurate information is provided on the correct forms properly rests with applicants themselves. We therefore conclude that, under these circumstances, Green Bay has failed to make a showing warranting relief and, therefore, its Request for Review must be denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed August 2, 2001 by Green Bay Area Public Schools, Green Bay, Wisconsin IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark Seifert, Deputy Chief Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Danielle A. Nerad, Green Bay Area Public Schools, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-482A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-482A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-482A1.txt
  • By extending this deadline, we provide the independent auditor with more time to complete its work, thereby ensuring a complete and accurate draft audit report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 254 and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, the waiver request filed by the Universal Service Administrative Company on February 19, 2002, is GRANTED to allow submission of the draft audit report for the year 2001 on or before April 15, 2002. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-4A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-4A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-4A1.txt
  • is specified. Bidders can access the FCC Bidding System over the Internet. As a contingency, bidders can also access the FCC Bidding System over the FCC's Wide Area Network. Access to the Bidding System via the Internet requires, at a minimum, the following hardware and software: CPU: Pentium 133 or above RAM: 32 MB (64 MB recommended) "! ug-In Version 1.3.1 (available for downloading at http://java.sun.com/products/plugin/) In addition, users accessing the Bidding System via the FCC's Wide Area Network will need: Modem: 28.8 Kbps Hayes(c) compatible modem or faster (56.6 Kbps recommended) Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) Dialer: Use the Dial-Up Networking feature included with the operating system Access to the FCC Bidding System via the Wide Area Network requires access to a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-558A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-558A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-558A1.txt
  • the requirements of section 1.925 of the Commission's rules for grant of a waiver; any entity seeking a waiver of the cellular vertical polarization requirement similarly must submit a petition for waiver and satisfy the waiver standard. See Comments of OnStar Corporation (``OnStar Comments''). Reply Comments of AirCell, Inc. (``AirCell Reply Comments''). 47 C.F.R. � 1.925. Alternatively, pursuant to section 1.3, the Commission has authority to waive its rules if there is ``good cause'' to do so. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990); WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969). Year 2000 Biennial Regulatory Review - Amendment of Part 22 of the Commission's Rules to Modify
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-563A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-563A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-563A1.txt
  • on the FCC Form 175, will assist the Commission in monitoring the participation of these ``designated entities'' in its auctions. Exhibit F -- Miscellaneous Information: Applicants wishing to submit additional information should include it in Exhibit F. Waivers: Applicants requesting waiver of any rules must submit a statement of reasons sufficient to justify the waiver sought. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925. Certifications: Applicants should carefully read the list of certifications on the FCC Form 175. These certifications help to ensure a fair and competitive auction and require, among other things, disclosure to the Commission of certain information on applicant ownership and agreements or arrangements concerning the auction. Submission of an FCC Form 175 application constitutes a representation by the certifying
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-581A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-581A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-581A1.txt
  • customers located in the 847 and 224 NPAs, we are confident that any confusion will be minimal and short-lived. We therefore conclude that CUB has not shown good cause for granting a permanent waiver of the ten-digit dialing requirement, nor has CUB demonstrated that a permanent waiver would be in the public interest. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1.3 and 52.19 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91 and 0.291, that the Amended Citizens Utility Board Petition for Expedited Permanent Waiver of 47 C.F.R. � 52.19(c)(3)(ii) is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey J. Carlisle Senior Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Amended Citizens Utility Board Petition for Expedited Permanent Waiver of 47 C.F.R. � 52.19(c)(3)(ii), filed October 4, 2001
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-597A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-597A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-597A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of AT&T Corp. Requesting An Additional Extension of Time in Which to Convert Other Informal Complaints to Formal Complaints and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-607A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-607A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-607A1.txt
  • � 3007 (uncodified; reproduced at 47 U.S.C. �309(j) note 3). See ``Auction of Licenses in the 698-746 MHz Band Scheduled for June 19, 2002; Comment Sought on Reserve Prices or Minimum Opening Bids and Other Auction Procedural Issues,'' Public Notice, DA 02-200 (rel. January 24, 2002). See 47 C.F.R. � 0.331 (authority delegated to Wireless Telecommunications Bureau); 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (suspension, amendment, and waiver of Commission Rules). See also 5 U.S.C. � 553(b)(B). See, e.g., 47 U.S.C. � 309. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. � 1.429. See, e.g., 47 U.S.C. �� 303, 309. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). Id. See In the Matter of Implementation of Interim Electronic Filing Procedures for Certain Commission Filings, Order,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-642A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-642A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-642A1.txt
  • it must be filed with enough time to achieve the 28-day period before filing of the FCC Form 471, ``which must be postmarked no later than January 18... .'' We therefore find that AIC has failed to demonstrate special circumstances upon which its Waiver Request can be granted. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by art in context, New York, New York, on August 30, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Charles SanClementi, Jr., art in context, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-643A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-643A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-643A1.txt
  • wishes to be considered with other in-window applicants. How the applicant delegates responsibility for the applications is not relevant to our analysis. We conclude that Wilcox has not demonstrated the existence of any special circumstances warranting a deviation from our rules, and therefore, we deny its Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Dermott Special School District, Dermott, Arkansas, on August 17, 2001; Hoven School District No. 53-2, Hoven, South Dakota, on August 24, 2001; Mastics-Moriches-Shirley Community Library, Shirley, New York, on August 16, 2001; Mounds Public Schools, Mounds, Oklahoma, on August 20,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-644A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-644A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-644A1.txt
  • that it must be filed with enough time to achieve the 28-day period before filing of the FCC Form 471, ``which must be postmarked no later than January 18... .'' We conclude that Loutit has failed to demonstrate special circumstances upon which its Waiver Request can be granted. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Loutit District Library, Grand Haven, Michigan on August 29, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Gail Skruch, Loutit District Library, to Federal Communications Commission, filed August 29,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-659A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-659A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-659A2.txt
  • on the FCC Form 175, will assist the Commission in monitoring the participation of these ``designated entities'' in its auctions. Exhibit F -- Miscellaneous Information: Applicants wishing to submit additional information should include it in Exhibit F. Waivers: Applicants requesting waiver of any rules must submit a statement of reasons sufficient to justify the waiver sought. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925. Certifications: Applicants should carefully read the list of certifications on the FCC Form 175. These certifications help to ensure a fair and competitive auction and require, among other things, disclosure to the Commission of certain information on applicant ownership and agreements or arrangements concerning the auction. Submission of an FCC Form 175 application constitutes a representation by the certifying
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-659A2_Erratum.doc
  • on the FCC Form 175, will assist the Commission in monitoring the participation of these ``designated entities'' in its auctions. Exhibit F -- Miscellaneous Information: Applicants wishing to submit additional information should include it in Exhibit F. Waivers: Applicants requesting waiver of any rules must submit a statement of reasons sufficient to justify the waiver sought. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925. Certifications: Applicants should carefully read the list of certifications on the FCC Form 175. These certifications help to ensure a fair and competitive auction and require, among other things, disclosure to the Commission of certain information on applicant ownership and agreements or arrangements concerning the auction. Submission of an FCC Form 175 application constitutes a representation by the certifying
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-68A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-68A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-68A1.txt
  • adherence to the general rule. A rule, therefore, may be waived where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. In the instant case, we conclude that Schuyler fails to demonstrate special circumstances warranting a deviation from our rules, and therefore deny its Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed July 7, 2000 by Schuyler R-1 School District, Queen City, Missouri and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal are DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-699A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-699A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-699A1.txt
  • of awareness that a new form was being used in Funding Year 4 and SLD's failure to notify Floyd County of the new form are not circumstances that warrant a deviation from program requirements. We therefore find that Floyd County has failed to demonstrate grounds for a waiver. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Floyd County Board of Education, Rome, Georgia, on April 3, 2001 IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Request for Review filed by Floyd County Board of Education, Rome, Georgia, on July 24, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-69A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-69A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-69A1.txt
  • must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Cotton Center fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Cotton Center ISD, Cotton Center, Texas, on June 13, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Keith E. Gast, Cotton Center ISD, to Federal Communications Commission, filed June
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-707A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-707A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-707A1.txt
  • disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 8. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Partial Withdrawal of Informal Complaint and Petition for Additional Extension of Time filed by Indiana Paging Network, Inc. IS GRANTED. 9. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-70A1.txt
  • 28, 2000, three days before the filing window closed on March 31, 2000. Because Frazier demonstrates that it mailed its forms at least three days before the filing window closed, in accordance with Hardee County, we direct SLD to consider its application as filed within the filing window. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Frazier School District, Perryopolis, Pennsylvania on August 17, 2000 IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein, and Frazier's application IS REMANDED to SLD for further consideration in light of this decision. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-71A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-71A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-71A1.txt
  • must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Pottsville fails to present sufficient good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Pottsville Area School District, Pottsville, Pennsylvania on August 15, 2000, IS DENIED to the extent provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Diane Hutchinson, Pottsville Area School District, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-721A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-721A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-721A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of AT&T Corp. Resolving Certain Informal Complaints and Requesting An Additional Extension of Time in Which to Convert Other Informal Complaints to Formal Complaints and Toll Limitations
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-72A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-72A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-72A1.txt
  • necessary to place on the applicant the responsibility of complying with all relevant rules and procedures, including filing deadlines. Here, Scottsdale Horizons fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Scottsdale Horizons School, Scottsdale, Arizona, on July 12, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Harry Stelling, Jr., Scottsdale Horizons School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed July 12,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-741A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-741A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-741A1.txt
  • properly complete the required application or otherwise fail to follow program rules, run the risk that their applications may not be considered within the filing window. We therefore conclude that ACCEPT has failed to make a showing warranting relief and, therefore, its Request for Review must be denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed July 31, 2001 by ACCEPT Education Collaborative IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Michael Pallidino, ACCEPT Education Collaborative to Federal Communications Commission, filed July 31, 2001 (Request
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-743A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-743A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-743A1.txt
  • complete the required application or otherwise fail to follow program rules, run the risk that their applications may not be considered within the filing window. We therefore conclude that Saint Martin has failed to make a showing warranting relief and, therefore, its Request for Review must be denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed July 30, 2001 by Saint Martin of Tours School, Bronx, New York IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Sister Nora McArt, Saint Martin of Tours School, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-745A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-745A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-745A1.txt
  • properly complete the required application or otherwise fail to follow program rules, run the risk that their applications may not be considered within the filing window. We therefore conclude that Adirondack has failed to make a showing warranting relief and, therefore, its Request for Review must be denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed November 5, 2001 by Southern Adirondack Library System, Saratoga Springs, New York IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Request for Review of the Decision of the Universal Service Administrator
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-75A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-75A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-75A1.txt
  • Athanasius provides no evidence of when it mailed its application. In keeping with this Order, St. Athanasius may provide evidence to substantiate its claim that it mailed its application on January 14, 2000. Upon timely submission, the Commission will determine whether the evidence supports a grant of waiver. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the following applicants SHALL SUBMIT, within 60 days of the date of the release of this Order, any such evidence as required by the terms of this Order concerning the date of the filing of their applications: Alpine County Unified School District, Markleeville, California, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-765A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-765A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-765A1.txt
  • authorization to operate and launch EchoStar 7, which EchoStar has successfully launched. See note 22, supra. Further, we understand that EchoStar is planning to file an application for authorization to launch EchoStar 8, and that both EchoStar 7 and EchoStar 8 will include spot beams to provide local-into-local service. A party seeking a waiver must meet the requirements of Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules by demonstrating good cause, lack of other reasonable alternatives, and compliance with general requirements for granting waivers. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also Northeast Cellular Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990); WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972). As some broadcasters
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-76A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-76A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-76A1.txt
  • before the filing window closed, and it was received by SLD on January 24, 2000. Stanley offers no other extenuating circumstances in support of its Waiver Request. We conclude that Stanley fails to demonstrate special circumstances warranting a deviation from our rules, and therefore deny its Waiver Request. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the following Waiver Requests ARE DENIED: Anna Stowell Sunderland Bingham Memorial School, Cornwall, Vermont, filed June 6, 2000; Capitol Region Education Council, Hartford, Connecticut, filed June 26, 2000; Dickinson Public Schools, Dickinson, North Dakota, filed June 26, 2000; Ekalaka Public Schools, Ekalaka, Montana, filed July
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-7A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-7A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-7A1.txt
  • has not shown sufficient cause to justify a stay of the ten-digit dialing rule with respect to the 847 and 224 NPAs. The second request for waiver filed by the Illinois Commission will expire on January 7, 2002. Accordingly, ten-digit dialing must be implemented in these NPAs no later than January 8, 2002. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1.3, and 52.19 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 52.19, and the authority delegated in to sections 0.91 and 0.291, of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, IT IS ORDERED that the Illinois Citizens Utility Board Motion for Stay of 47 C.F.R. Section 52.19(c)(3)(ii) in the 847 and 224 NPAs is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey J.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-820A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-820A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-820A1.txt
  • Order, 9 FCC Rcd. 4957, 5018 (1994) (PCS MO&O). See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.946, 24.843. Section 1.946(e) includes examples of specific circumstances that would not warrant an extension of time to complete construction. 47 C.F.R. � 1.946(e)(2)-(3). PCS MO&O at 5019, citing WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969). 47 C.F.R. � 1.925. Alternatively, pursuant to section 1.3, the Commission has authority to waive its rules if there is ``good cause'' to do so. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990). 47 U.S.C. � 309(j)(4)(B). Extension Request at 2-3. Id. Monet states that the HDR technology will provide a 15-fold increase over currently available wireless technologies in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-822A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-822A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-822A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of AT&T Corp. Resolving Certain Informal Complaints and Requesting An Additional Extension of Time in Which to Convert Informal Complaint Against CTC Telcom to Formal Complaint and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-82A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-82A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-82A1.txt
  • must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Governor's School fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by the Governor's School for Global Economics and Technology, Keysville, Virginia, on July 17, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Nancy R. Carwile, Governor's School for Global Economics
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-830A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-830A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-830A1.txt
  • that their applications may not be considered for funding. The burden of ensuring that complete and accurate information is provided properly rests with the applicants themselves. We therefore conclude that Davis has failed to make a showing warranting relief and, therefore, its Request for Review must be denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed December 20, 2001, by Davis School District, Farmington, Utah, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Richard Lemon, Davis School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed December 20,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-832A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-832A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-832A1.txt
  • representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Here, Lancaster Area fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Lancaster Area Library, Lancaster, Pennsylvania on October 19, 2001, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Common
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-833A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-833A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-833A1.txt
  • January 18, 2001 filing window had closed. However, since the Request for Review was filed, SLD has determined that Lewis County's Form 471 application for discounted services was timely filed and has issued a Funding Commitment Decision Letter. Lewis County's Request for Review is therefore dismissed as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Lewis County School District, Weston, West Virginia, on August 28, 2001 IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Nathaniel Hawthorne, Lewis County School District, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-835A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-835A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-835A1.txt
  • application because the listed FCC Form 470 Application number contained less than 14 digits. Thus, in accordance with the Bureau's decision in the Pediatric Library Order, we remand Volusia's application to SLD for further processing consistent with the way the SLD processed applications with 14 or more digits. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by the School District of Volusia County, on April 16, 2001, IS GRANTED, and this application is REMANDED for further processing. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from the School
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-841A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-841A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-841A1.txt
  • other representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Here, Haywood fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Haywood County Schools, Clyde, North Carolina on February 20, 2002, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert, Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-860A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-860A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-860A1.txt
  • of section 32.27(c) filed by Verizon. This waiver is limited to services provided to Verizon by the affiliates listed in the waiver request. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 201-205, and 218-220 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 154(j), 201-205, and 218-220, and Sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.106, 32.18, and 32.27 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.106, 32.18, and 32.27, that the Petition for Waiver filed by Verizon IS GRANTED to the extent described above in paragraph 5. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tamara L. Preiss Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Verizon Telephone Companies Petition for Waiver, filed March 1, 2002 (Verizon
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-861A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-861A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-861A1.txt
  • Exhibit 1.1 IB Customers will scroll down and click on the application they wish to select. Several of the applications available for filing are shown in Exhibit 1.2. Exhibit 1.2 IB Customers are presented with a new screen, which offers them the opportunity to register for either an Applicant's FRN, Assignee/Transferee's FRN, or both, in CORES as shown on Exhibit 1.3. To take advantage of this opportunity, click on the Register in CORES link, if you have not already done so. For the purpose of display, we have chosen to demonstrate registering for an assignee/transferee FRN. Exhibit 1.3 IB Customers will be transferred temporarily to the COmmission REgistration System (CORES) where they will enter the requested information. See Exhibit 1.4. Exhibit
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-86A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-86A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-86A1.txt
  • service prior to filing the FCC Form 471 is itself a violation of the competitive bidding rules. However, we find that the new information cannot be accepted. The FCC Form 471s specified contract award dates for the services requested, and Richmond may not submit contrary information on appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Richmond County Public Schools, Warsaw, Virginia, on May 9, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Karl G. O'Dell, Richmond County Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-888A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-888A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-888A1.txt
  • merits of Puerto Rico Telephone's petition in light of all the information filed in this proceeding, and in light of other related proceedings. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petitions for waiver of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 61.41, filed by: ALLTEL Corporation on December 3, 2001, and February 22, 2002; CenturyTel, Inc., and CenturyTel of Alabama, LLC on November 28, 2001; CenturyTel, Inc., and CenturyTel of Missouri, LLC on December 13, 2001; and Puerto
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-88A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-88A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-88A1.txt
  • applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Tuxedo fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Tuxedo Park School, Tuxedo Park, New York, on January 30, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from James T. Burger, Tuxedo Park School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-891A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-891A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-891A1.txt
  • does not apply to Kings Local, notwithstanding SLD's misapplication of the 60-day appeal period to Kings Local. See Administrator's Decisions on Appeal (applying the 60-day appeal period inadvertently to Kings Local). SLD's misapplication of the 60-day appeal period is an immaterial error and does not affect our decision in this case. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Request for Review. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). See Request for Review by Anderson School Staatsburg, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Changes to the Board of Directors of the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., File No. SLD-133664, CC Docket Nos. 96-45 and 97-21, Order, 15 FCC Rcd 25610 (Com. Car. Bur.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-89A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-89A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-89A1.txt
  • period would have ended on January 18, 2000, and Alton would have been able to sign contracts and file its FCC Form 471 before the close of the filing window on January 19, 2000. We therefore find that Alton should be granted a waiver of the filing window. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed by Alton Elementary School - Maine School Union No. 90 (Alton), Milford, Maine, on October 4, 2000 IS GRANTED, and this application is remanded to SLD for further processing consistent with this opinion. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-930A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-930A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-930A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Partial Withdrawal of Informal Complaint and the Petition for Additional Extension of Time filed by Indiana Paging Network, Inc. ARE GRANTED. 10. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-944A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-944A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-944A1.txt
  • minimum processing standards is submitted. As SLD noted, both the corrections to OLL's original application form and the new application using the correct form were submitted after the close of the filing window. Thus, SLD correctly found that OLL's application had not been submitted within the filing window. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review, filed by Our Lady of Loretto, Redford, Mississippi, on July 11, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Lynne Wendt, Our Lady of Loretto, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-945A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-945A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-945A1.txt
  • review and process each year, we find that it is administratively necessary to require an applicant to be responsible for providing complete and accurate information in its FCC Form 471 upon which its ultimate funding is dependent. Therefore, we conclude that SLD properly denied Springfield's request for funding. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review, filed by Springfield Public Schools, Springfield, New Jersey, on May 23, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Daniela Tattoli, Spingfield Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-948A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-948A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-948A1.txt
  • NPAs in the initial rollout schedule to three NPAs per quarter in each NPAC region), to facilitate the most efficient rollout schedule. California Public Utilities Commission Comments at 2-3. See VoiceStream Wireless Corporation Comments at 1. See also Rural Cellular Association Comments at 2-5. See Native Block Pooling Procedures, submitted by NANC Wireless Number Portability Subcommittee, Wireless Pooling Task Force, V1.3 (Feb. 2002); Wireless Number Portability Operations Risk Assessment Report: Launching Wireless Pooling or Porting Without Ubiquitous Separation of the MIN & MDN (Feb. 5, 2002); Wireless Number Portability Operations Status Report to NANC (Feb. 11, 2002). In March 2002, NeuStar implemented Native Block Pooling for wireless carriers. Native Block Pooling is a process which allows wireless carriers to participate in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-956A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-956A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-956A1.txt
  • wishes to be considered within the window. An applicant must further take responsibility for the actions of those employees or agents to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely and proper requests for discounts on its behalf. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Information Technology Department, State of North Dakota, Bismarck, North Dakota, on October 17, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Curtis Wolfe, Information Technology Department, State
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-960A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-960A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-960A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of AT&T Corp. Requesting Additional Extension of Time in Which to Convert Informal Complaint Against CTC Telcom to Formal Complaint and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. against
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-970A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-970A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-970A1.txt
  • electronically are reminded they are still required to serve copies in accordance with these rules as stated herein. III. ORDERING CLAUSE 11. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4 (i) and (j), 201-209, of the Communications Act, as amended that this order is HEREBY ADOPTED as described above. 12. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commissions rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, section 69.3 of the Commission's rules 47 C.F.R. � 69.3, is WAIVED for the purpose specified in paragraph 2 supra. 13. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commissions rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, section 61.49(k) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �61.49(k), IS WAIVED for the purpose
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-971A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-971A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-971A1.txt
  • corrected by Erratum, Public Notice, DA 02-880 (rel. April 16, 2002); and Auction of Licenses in the 698-746 MHz Band Scheduled for June 19, 2002; Notice and Filing Requirements, Minimum Opening Bids, Upfront Payments and Other Auction Procedures, Public Notice, DA 02-563 (rel. March 20, 2002). See 47 C.F.R. � 0.331 (authority delegated to Wireless Telecommunications Bureau); 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (suspension, amendment, and waiver of Commission Rules). See, e.g., 47 U.S.C. � 309. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. � 1.115. See, e.g., 47 U.S.C. �� 303, 309. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). Id. See In the Matter of Implementation of Interim Electronic Filing Procedures for Certain Commission Filings, Order, FCC 01-345 (rel. Nov. 29, 2001)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-101A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-101A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-101A1.txt
  • to whom the applicant gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Here, Mirrer Yeshiva fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Mirrer Yeshiva Educational Institute, Brooklyn, New York on February 20, 2002, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1025A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1025A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1025A1.txt
  • from the general rule, and such deviation would better serve the public interest than strict adherence to the general rule. La Salle's reasons of misunderstanding and need for the funding are not a special circumstance warranting a waiver. Therefore, we affirm SLD and deny the Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3,and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by La Salle Institute, Troy, New York on March 15, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from William P. Maloney III, La Salle Institute, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1026A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1026A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1026A1.txt
  • did not necessitate conflict resolution, or excessively delayed before notifying an applicant of problems with an FCC Form 470, such circumstances are not present here. Thus, the circumstances described by Lauderdale are not special circumstances warranting a waiver. Therefore, we affirm SLD and deny Lauderdale's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Lauderdale County Board of Education, Florence, Alabama, on August 17, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Jerry Fulmer, Lauderdale County Board of Education, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1027A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1027A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1027A1.txt
  • general rule. Misunderstanding of the rules is not a special circumstance warranting a waiver of the filing window. Neither is the threat that denial of funding may have a detrimental impact on a particular school or library. Therefore, we affirm the Administrator and deny the Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Requests filed by Ridgemont Public Library, Mt. Victory, Ohio, on January 29, 2002, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Nancy J. Terrill, Ridgemont Public Library, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-102A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-102A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-102A1.txt
  • SLD's website (as one of its staff personnel eventually did) or contacting SLD directly. Either method would have apprised it of the funding decision in time to meet all applicable deadlines. Thus, we find that Port Angeles has not demonstrated circumstances warranting a deviation from the general rule. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed by Port Angeles School District 121, Port Angeles, Washington, on July 2, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireless Competition Bureau Facsimile from Jim Bennett, Olympic Peninsula Consultants, on behalf of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-103A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-103A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-103A1.txt
  • have consistently held that, absent special circumstances, applicants who request waiver of the FCC Form 471 deadline will be denied. Here, Gunter fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its applications. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Requests filed by Gunter Independent School District, Gunter, Texas, on March 1 and 28, 2002 ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau 47 C.F.R. �� 54.502, 54.503; Letters from Dwana Uselton, Gunter Independent
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1045A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1045A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1045A1.txt
  • 28.35-28.6 and 29.25-29.5 GHz (uplink) bands at the 89� W.L. orbit location, held by Loral Space & Communications Corporation, 12 FCC Rcd 23027 (Int'l Bur. 1997) and 13 FCC Rcd 1416 (Int'l Bur. 1997), each modified by Order and Authorization, 16 FCC Rcd 2481 (Int'l Bur. 2001), ARE DECLARED NULL AND VOID. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the launch milestone associated with Loral Space & Communications Corporation's Orion F7 satellite, as authorized at 12 FCC Rcd 23027 (Int'l Bur. 1997) is extended, for the portion of the Orion F7 authorization that is to become part of the Telstar 8 hybrid satellite, as follows: Launch 19.7-20.2 GHz (downlink) and 29.5-30.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1083A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1083A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1083A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of MCI WORLDCOM Network Services, Inc. Requesting Waiver of Section 1.718 of the Commission's Rules and Further Extension of Time In Which to Convert Its Informal Complaint
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1093A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1093A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1093A1.txt
  • of Michigan, Public Notice, DA 97-127 (Jan. 17, 1997); Revised Procedures for Bell Operating Company Applications Under Section 271 of the Communications Act, Public Notice, 13 FCC Rcd 17457 (Sept. 19, 1997); Updated Filing Requirements for Bell Operating Company Applications Under Section 271 of the Communications Act, Public Notice, DA-99-1994 (Sept. 28, 1999) (collectively ``271 Procedural Public Notices''). See section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Ameritech Michigan Order at 20575, para. 57; Application of Bell Atlantic New York for Authorization Under Section 271 of the Communications Act To Provide In-Region, InterLATA Service in the State of New York, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 3953, 3968, para. 34 (1999). See 271 Procedural Public Notices. See Public
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1104A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1104A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1104A1.txt
  • would obviate the need to include advanced services within the price cap indexes and rates, constitutes special circumstances, and such circumstances outweigh any harm to competition. Ordering Clauses 10. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 204(a), and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, section 61.42(g) of the Commission's rules IS WAIVED for services transferred from VADI to Verizon, only with respect to Verizon's 2003 Annual Access Tariff Filing requirements under section 61.43 of the Commission's rules. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Deena Shetler Deputy Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau The Verizon Telephone
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1105A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1105A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1105A1.txt
  • points because of the difficulty in demonstrating that at least fifty percent of the settled U.S.-billed traffic between the United States and the above-named foreign points is being settled at or below the relevant benchmark rates as established in In the Matter of International Settlement Rates, IB Docket 96-261, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 19,806 (1997). Pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, AT&T states that there is good cause to waive for the above-named foreign points, the requirement in Section 63.16 of the Commission's rules and requests ISR designation for the above-named foreign points. Interested parties may file comments regarding or petitions to deny the applications no later than May 7, 2003. Oppositions or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1113A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1113A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1113A1.txt
  • Communications Corporation, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 10 FCC Rcd 13337, 13338 (Int'l Bur. 1995); Policies and Procedures for the Licensing of Space and Earth Stations in the Radiodetermination Satellite Service, 104 F.C.C.2d 650, 665 (1986) (Radiodetermination Satellite Service Rules Order). E-Sat License, 13 FCC Rcd. at 10874. Milestone Extension Request at pp. 2-3. 47 C.F.R. � 25.117(e)(1) (2002). See Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (2002). See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (WAIT Radio); GE American Communications Inc. Request for Extension of Time to Construct, Launch and Operate a Ka-band Satellite System in the Fixed-Satellite Service, 16 FCC Rcd. 11038, 11041 (Int'l Bur. 2001). See Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-111A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-111A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-111A1.txt
  • applicant who has responsibility ultimately for the timely submission of its appeals. Staffing problems do not relieve applicants of their responsibility to comply with the program's rules and procedures. Therefore, we conclude that Gloversville has failed to demonstrate special circumstances upon which its Waiver Request can be granted. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Gloversville Enlarged School District, Gloversville, New York, on February 15, 2002, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-112A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-112A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-112A1.txt
  • Company, to Ernie L. Boyd, Jr., S.C. Governor's School for Science and Mathematics, dated August 20, 2001 (Administrator's Decision on Waiver Request). On October 29, 2001, S.C. Governor's School filed its appeal of SLD's modification to this funding request. Letter from Ernie L. Boyd, Jr., S.C. Governor's School for Science and Mathematics, filed October 29, 2001. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Request for Review. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). See Request for Review by Anderson School Staatsburg, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Changes to the Board of Directors of the National Exchange Carrier Association, File No. SLD-133664, CC Docket Nos. 96-45 and 97-21, Order, 15 FCC Rcd 25610 (Com. Car. Bur. rel.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1132A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1132A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1132A1.txt
  • this proceeding require that any additional pleadings, other than those described herein, must be served and filed prior to the initial status conference. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. �� 1.726 (replies), 1.729 (discovery). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), 208, and 255 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 208, 255, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Unopposed Motion of Complainant for Limited Modification of the Procedural Schedule IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Colleen K. Heitkamp Chief, Telecommunications Consumers Division Enforcement Bureau See O'Day v. Audiovox Communications Corporation and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1134A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1134A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1134A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1138A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1138A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1138A1.txt
  • the thousands of applications SLD processes each year, it is administratively necessary to place the burden of meeting deadlines on the applicants. As we have consistently held in the past, applicants are responsible for submitting their appeals in a timely manner and complying with program rules and procedures. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Sierra-Plumas Joint Unified School District, Downieville, California on February 12, 2003, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1139A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1139A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1139A1.txt
  • to submit its FCC Form 471, ten months after it learned that Comcast had agreed to continue the contract and the filing window had closed. In light of these considerations, we find that Hatboro-Horsham's argument does not justify a waiver of our rules and deny Hatboro-Horsham's Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Hatboro-Horsham School District, Horsham, Pennsylvania on February 20, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Susan Casagrand, Hatboro-Horsham School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed February 20,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1166A4.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1166A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1166A4.txt
  • names or areas of a screen (e.g., Location field, Selected Licenses area of a screen). bold italic Represents characters that you must type exactly as they appear in the instructions. For example, if you are instructed to type https://auctions.fcc.gov, you should type all of the characters exactly as they are printed. Minimum Hardware and Software Requirements "! va Plug-In Version 1.3.0 is available for downloading at In addition, users accessing the FCC Automated Auction System via the FCC's Wide Area Network will need: Modem: 28.8 Kbps Hayes(c) compatible modem or faster (56.6 Kbps recommended) Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) Dialer: Use the Dial-Up Networking feature included with the operating system Accessing the FCC Mock Auction To access the Mock Auction, point your browser
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1169A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1169A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1169A1.txt
  • begin receiving high-cost support as of February 1, 2002, the date it filed its high-cost certification under section 54.314 of the Commission's rules. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.314(d) of the Commission's rules, filed by Guam Cellular and Paging, Inc. on February 6, 2002, IS GRANTED, as described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Eric N. Einhorn Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau 47 U.S.C. � 254(e). Section 214(e) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1174A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1174A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1174A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of MCI WORLDCOM Network Services, Inc. Requesting Waiver of Section 1.718 of the Commission's Rules and Further Extension of Time In Which to Convert Its Informal Complaint
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1175A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1175A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1175A1.txt
  • replies electronically are reminded they are still required to serve copies in accordance with these rules as stated herein. III. ORDERING CLAUSE 11. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4 (i) and (j), 201-209, of the Communications Act, as amended, this order is HEREBY ADOPTED as described above. 13. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commissions rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, section 61.49(k) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 61.49(k), IS WAIVED for the purpose specified in paragraph 6 supra. 14. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, section 1.4(f) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.4(f), IS WAIVED for the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-117A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-117A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-117A1.txt
  • who is ultimately responsible for the timely submission of its appeals. Staffing problems do not relieve applicants of their responsibility to comply with the program's rules and procedures. Therefore, we conclude that St. Norbert has failed to demonstrate special circumstances upon which its Waiver Request can be granted. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by St. Norbert School, Northbrook, Illinois on March 21, 2002, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1187A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1187A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1187A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-118A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-118A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-118A1.txt
  • strictly to its filing deadlines. In order for the program to work efficiently, the applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its appeal to SLD if it wishes its appeal to be considered on the merits. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by St. John's Preparatory School, Astoria, New York on March 21, 2002, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-119A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-119A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-119A1.txt
  • representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Here, Chelsea School fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Chelsea School, Chelsea, Maine on March 11, 2002, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-120A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-120A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-120A1.txt
  • representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Here, Apostles School fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Queen of Apostles School, Alexandria, Virginia on March 5, 2002, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-123A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-123A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-123A1.txt
  • representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Here, Washington County fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Washington County Educational Service Center, Marietta, Ohio on March 4, 2002, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-124A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-124A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-124A1.txt
  • who has responsibility ultimately for the timely submission of its appeals. Staffing problems do not relieve applicants of their responsibility to comply with the program's rules and procedures. Therefore, we conclude that Granger School has failed to demonstrate special circumstances upon which its Waiver Request can be granted. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Granger School District No. 204, Granger School, Washington, on February 27, 2002, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1261A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1261A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1261A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties, and of this Commission, until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1263A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1263A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1263A1.txt
  • 148� W.L. to other BSS or other services or satellite systems operating in accordance with the ITU Radio Regulations; and (2) no protection from interference caused by radio stations authorized by other administrations is guaranteed to EchoStar 2 unless and until Appendices 30 and 30A plan modification procedures are successfully and timely completed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �1.3, that EchoStar is granted a waiver of Section 25.148(c) of the Commission's rules regarding DBS geographic service, 47 C.F.R. �25.148(c), and Section 25.202(g) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �25.202(g), conditioned as set forth in this Order above. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the application for Special Temporary Authority filed by EchoStar Satellite
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1268A5.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1268A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1268A5.txt
  • names or areas of a screen (e.g., Location field, Selected Licenses area of a screen). bold italic Represents characters that you must type exactly as they appear in the instructions. For example, if you are instructed to type https://auctions.fcc.gov, you should type all of the characters exactly as they are printed. Minimum Hardware and Software Requirements "! va Plug-In Version 1.3.0 is available for downloading at In addition, users accessing the FCC Automated Auction System via the FCC's Wide Area Network will need: Modem: 28.8 Kbps Hayes(c) compatible modem or faster (56 Kbps recommended) Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) Dialer: Use the Dial-Up Networking feature included with the operating system Accessing the FCC Mock Auction To access the Mock Auction, point your browser
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1292A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1292A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1292A1.txt
  • pending the outcome of that proceeding. Finally, the Commission did not contemplate altering the minimum hours of operation of DTV stations in the Second DTV Periodic Review NPRM; therefore, the pendancy of that proceeding does not provide grounds for deferring the effective date of the increased operating requirements. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, NCE TV stations ARE GRANTED a six-month waiver of the simulcast requirements in Section 73.624(f) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 73.624(f), until November 1, 2003, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Request for Temporary Waiver of DTV Simulcasting Requirements filed by Milwaukee Area Technical College IS GRANTED
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1443A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1443A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1443A1.txt
  • Settlement Rates, IB Docket 96-261, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 19,806 (1997) and In the Matter of 1998 Biennial Regulatory Review -- Reform of the International Settlements Policy and Associated Filing Requirements, IB Docket Nos. 98-148 and 95-22, CC Docket No. 90-337 (Phase II), Report and Order and Order on Reconsideration, 14 FCC Rcd 7963 (1999). Pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, AT&T states that there is good cause to waive for the above-named foreign points, the requirement in Section 43.51(e)(3) of the Commission's rules and requests that the above-named foreign points be added to the Commission's list of U.S.-international routes exempt from the ISP. Interested parties may file comments regarding or petitions to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1526A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1526A1.txt
  • Petition at 7-9. DBAC Response at 3-6. DBAC Response at 10-13. DBAC Response at 6. SES Americom Response at 6. We note that SES Americom does not propose to provide DBS service using orbital locations assigned to the United States under the ITU Region 2 Band Plan. See SES Americom, Petition for Declaratory Ruling, filed April 25, 2002. See Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (``WAIT Radio''); Northeast Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (``Northeast Cellular''). Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1159. WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1157. SES Americom also argues that a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1526A1_Erratum.doc
  • Petition at 7-9. DBAC Response at 3-6. DBAC Response at 10-13. DBAC Response at 6. SES Americom Response at 6. We note that SES Americom does not propose to provide DBS service using orbital locations assigned to the United States under the ITU Region 2 Band Plan. See SES Americom, Petition for Declaratory Ruling, filed April 25, 2002. See Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (``WAIT Radio''); Northeast Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (``Northeast Cellular''). Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1159. WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1157. SES Americom also argues that a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1547A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1547A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1547A1.txt
  • Division), in which case the applicant must indicate in Exhibit F that it has filed a confidentiality request. Because the required information bears on applicants' qualifications, the FCC envisions that confidentiality requests will not be routinely granted. Waivers: Applicants requesting waiver of any rules must submit a statement of reasons sufficient to justify the waiver sought. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. X. ATTACHMENT E AUCTION-SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR FCC REMITTANCE ADVICE (FCC FORM 159-February 2000 Edition) Upfront Payments The following information supplements the standard instructions for FCC Form 159 (Revised 2/00), and is provided to help ensure correct completion of FCC Form 159 for upfront payments for Auction No. 54. Applicants need to complete FCC Form 159 carefully, since: Mistakes may affect
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1565A5.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1565A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1565A5.txt
  • names or areas of a screen (e.g., Location field, Selected Licenses area of a screen). bold italic Represents characters that you must type exactly as they appear in the instructions. For example, if you are instructed to type https://auctions.fcc.gov, you should type all of the characters exactly as they are printed. Minimum Hardware and Software Requirements "! va Plug-In Version 1.3.0 is available for downloading at In addition, users accessing the FCC Automated Auction System via the FCC's Wide Area Network will need: Modem: 28.8 Kbps Hayes(c) compatible modem or faster (56 Kbps recommended) Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) Dialer: Use the Dial-Up Networking feature included with the operating system Accessing the FCC Mock Auction To access the Mock Auction, point your browser
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1570A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1570A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1570A1.txt
  • the thousands of applications SLD processes each year, it is administratively necessary to place the burden of meeting deadlines on the applicants. As we have consistently held in the past, applicants are responsible for submitting their appeals in a timely manner and complying with program rules and procedures. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by School District of Durand, Durand, Wisconsin on January 22, 2003, IS DISMISSED and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1575A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1575A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1575A1.txt
  • meeting deadlines on the applicants. As we have consistently held in the past, applicants are responsible for submitting their appeals in a timely manner and complying with program rules and procedures. Staffing problems do not relieve applicants of their responsibility to comply with the program's rules and procedures. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Gardner Unified School District 231, Gardner, Kansas on December 12, 2002, IS DISMISSED, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1576A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1576A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1576A1.txt
  • Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 339 (rel. Dec. 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com. Car. Bur. rel. Dec. 28, 2001 and Jan. 4, 2002). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). Request for Review. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). See Request for Review by Anderson School Staatsburg, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Changes to the Board of Directors of the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., File No. SLD-133664, CC Docket Nos. 96-45 and 97-21, Order, 15 FCC Rcd 25610 (Com. Car. Bur. rel. Nov.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1577A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1577A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1577A1.txt
  • the thousands of applications SLD processes each year, it is administratively necessary to place the burden of meeting deadlines on the applicants. As we have consistently held in the past, applicants are responsible for submitting their appeals in a timely manner and complying with program rules and procedures. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Lucia Mar Unified School District, Arroyo Grande, California on April 16, 2003 IS DISMISSED, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-160A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-160A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-160A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-165A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-165A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-165A1.txt
  • 1-2. CPK Petition at 2; Litchfield Petition at 2. CPK Petition at 4; Litchfield Petition at 4. CPK Petition at 4; Litchfield Petition at 4. CPK Petition at 3; Litchfield Petition at 3. CPK Petition at 3; Litchfield Petition at 2. CPK Petition at 3; Litchfield Petition at 3. CPK Petition at 3; Litchfield Petition at 3. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. 47 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(3)(ii). See Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (citing WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969)). Verizon Wireless's Petition for Partial Forbearance From Commercial Mobile Radio Services Number Portability Obligation and Telephone Number Portability , WT Docket No. 01-184, CC Docket No. 95-116, Memorandum Opinion and Order,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-170A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-170A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-170A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of Complainants For Extension of Time In Which To Convert Informal Complaints To Formal Complaint and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1723A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1723A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1723A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1740A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1740A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1740A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1750A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1750A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1750A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1751A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1751A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1751A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties, and of this Commission, until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1783A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1783A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1783A1.txt
  • (1990) (``Waiver Order''). Petition at 1-2. Univision and Telemundo were granted temporary waivers of the rule in 1978 and 1987, respectively. Waiver Order, 5 FCC Rcd at 7281-82. Id. at 7281. Id. Id. at 7281-82. Petition at 7. Id. at 4. 5 U.S.C, � 553(b)(3)(B). The Commission may waive its rules where good cause is shown. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; Wait Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 03 -1783 Federal Communications Commission DA 03 -1783 � � � � F � ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1811A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1811A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1811A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-181A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-181A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-181A1.txt
  • circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, and such deviation would better serve the public interest than strict adherence to the general rule. Boardman's reason is not a special circumstance warranting a waiver of the filing window. Therefore, we affirm SLD and deny the Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Boardman Local Schools, Youngstown, Ohio, on July 31, 2002, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Robert J. Wright, Boardman Local Schools, Youngstown, Ohio, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-186A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-186A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-186A1.txt
  • Services. This waiver is limited to services provided by Qwest Services to its affiliated entities and the purchaser listed in this waiver request. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 201-205, and 218-220 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 154(j), 201-205, and 218-220, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.106, 32.18, and 32.27 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.106, 32.18, and 32.27, that the Petition for Waiver filed by Qwest Services IS GRANTED to the extent described above in paragraph 5. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tamara L. Preiss Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Qwest Services Corporation Petition for Waiver, filed November 8, 2002
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1900A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1900A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1900A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that Notesan's Request for Waiver of Commission Rule 1.718(a) IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadline that would otherwise apply under section 1.718 of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1904A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1904A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1904A1.txt
  • Settlement Rates, IB Docket 96-261, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 19,806 (1997) and In the Matter of 1998 Biennial Regulatory Review -- Reform of the International Settlements Policy and Associated Filing Requirements, IB Docket Nos. 98-148 and 95-22, CC Docket No. 90-337 (Phase II), Report and Order and Order on Reconsideration, 14 FCC Rcd 7963 (1999). Pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, AT&T states that there is good cause to waive for the above-named foreign points, the requirement in Section 43.51(e)(3) of the Commission's rules and requests that the above-named foreign points be added to the Commission's list of U.S.-international routes exempt from the ISP. Interested parties may file comments regarding or petitions to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1904A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1904A3.txt
  • No. 98-148 and 95-22, CC Docket No. 90-331 (Phase II), Report & Order and Order on Reconsideration, ("ISP Order"), FCC 99-73, Released May 6, 1999. I 2 seeks a waiver of the rule and seeks exemption of the Countries from the ISP on routes between the United States and the Bahamas, Cayman Islands, Kazakhstan, Russia, Ukraine, Uzbekistan, and Yemen. Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules permits a waiver of any rule for "good cause shown."` As shown herein, AT&T demonstrates that good cause exists for the Commission to grant a waiver. In addition, the Commission may grant a waiver where special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule where such deviation serves the public interest, and the waiver is consistent
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1923A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1923A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1923A1.txt
  • received notice of the late-filed application, it was the Springfield's responsibility to file a timely and complete application before the close of the filing window. As a result, we do not agree that this is sufficient justification for waiver. Therefore, we affirm SLD and deny the Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Springfield School District on December 4, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Joseph Silver, Springfield School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed December 4, 2002 (Waiver
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1928A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1928A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1928A1.txt
  • is provided for in our current rules, Valor Texas has not shown good cause for a waiver of the X-factor rate reductions under section 61.45(b)(1)(i) of the Commission's rules. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i)-(j), and 201 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i)-(j), and 201, and sections 0.291 and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.291 and 1.3, Valor's petition for waiver of application of the X-factor under section 61.45(b)(1)(i) of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR � 61.45(b)(1)(i), IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William F. Maher, Jr. Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau See Valor Telecommunications of Texas, L.P.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-196A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-196A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-196A1.txt
  • and the parties consummated the assignment of the licenses on March 15, 2002. See File Nos. 0000606759 (assignment application) and 0000836534 (notice of consummation). 47 C.F.R. � 24.203(b). See May Supplement; June Supplement; September Supplement; and December Supplement. See File No. 0001021125, filed September 6, 2002. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.946(c), 1.955(a)(2), 24.203. 47 C.F.R. � 1.925. Alternatively, pursuant to section 1.3, the Commission has authority to waive its rules if there is ``good cause'' to do so. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.946, 24.843. Section 1.946(e) also states specific circumstances that would not warrant an extension of time to complete construction. 47 C.F.R. � 1.946(e)(2)-(3).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1975A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1975A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1975A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1976A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1976A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1976A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1978A8.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1978A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1978A8.txt
  • Connecting to the FCC Network using Windows 95/98 Dial-Up Networking requires at a minimum the following hardware and software: Hardware Requirements CPU: Pentium or above RAM: 32 MB (more recommended if you have multiple applications open) Monitor: VGA or above Modem: 28.8 Kbps, Hayes-compatible or faster (recommend 56.6 Kbps) Mouse or other pointing device Software Requirements . Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1_08. This plug in is available for downloading at http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.3/download.html Microsoft Windows 95/98/2000/XP Note: If you are running Windows in a networked environment, check with your local network administrator for any potential conflicts with the Windows 95/98 Dial-Up Networking. This usually includes any TCP/IP installed network protocol. Adobe Acrobat 4.0 Reader (or higher) is recommended as a plug-in to your browser.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1994A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1994A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1994A1.txt
  • a resubmission period to make minor corrections. During each filing period, submitted applications may be updated and amended multiple times until the filing deadline. Software Requirements Applicants will need to meet the following minimum software requirements: Web Browser, either of the following: Microsoft(R) Internet Explorer 4.0 or higher (recommended). Your browser must have either Microsoft VM or Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1 installed. If you wish to use the download feature on the Search Results page, you will need a .tar file extraction utility, e.g., Winzip (available at http://www.winzip.com) or Pkzip for Windows (available at http://www.pkware.com/shareware). Submitting FCC Form 175 Applications You can submit FCC Form 175 applications electronically via the Internet. Start your web browser and point it to either https://auctions.fcc.gov/
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2000A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2000A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2000A1.txt
  • Because this extension will facilitate the possible settlement of these numerous claims and allow the parties to await the Court's review of the Liability Order, we are satisfied that our action today serves the public interest. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 208, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and the authority delegated by sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111 and 0.311, that section 1.718(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.718(a), IS HEREBY WAIVED, with regard to the IPP EUCL informal complaints described herein and the deadline for the conversion and filing of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-207A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-207A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-207A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of MCI WORLDCOM Network Services, Inc. Requesting Waiver of Section 1.718 of the Commission's Rules and an Extension of Time In Which to Convert Its Informal Complaint
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2110A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2110A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2110A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-216A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-216A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-216A1.txt
  • carriers nationwide. Accordingly, there should be no discernible negative impact on the petitioners' subscribers from our denial of the requested waiver. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254 and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the joint petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze as codified in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, by Nemont Telephone Cooperative, Inc., Missouri Valley Communications, Inc., Reservation Telephone Cooperative, and Citizens Telecommunications Company of North Dakota dated September 24, 2002, IS GRANTED, as described
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2180A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2180A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2180A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2195A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2195A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2195A1.txt
  • 748073. Therefore, we dismiss as moot Wray's Waiver Request for FRNs 746217, 746370, 746485, 746562, 746582, 746700, and 748073. On June 26, 2003, Wray filed a Request to Withdraw its Waiver Request for FRN 746497. We grant Wray's Request to Withdraw and, accordingly, dismiss the Request for Waiver. Accordingly, it is ordered pursuant to authority delegated under section 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed by Wray School District RD2, Wray, Colorado on September 13, 2002, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Robyn Custer, Wray School District RD-2, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2257A6.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2257A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2257A6.txt
  • FCC Wide Area Network To participate as a bidder in an FCC auction or view the auction's announcements and round results, the FCC recommends accessing the FCC Automated Auction System via the Internet. As a contingency, you may access the FCC Automated Auction System via the FCC Wide Area Network. Minimum Hardware and Software Requirements "! . Java Plug-In Version 1.3.0 is available for downloading at http://wtbjag1w.fcc.gov/ieplugin/j2re-1_3_0_02-win.exe In addition, users accessing the FCC Auctions Bidding System via the FCC's Wide Area Network will need: Modem: 28.8 Kbps Hayes(c) compatible modem or faster (56 Kbps recommended) Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) Dialer: Use the Dial-Up Networking feature included with the operating system Connecting to the FCC Wide Area Network To connect to the FCC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2264A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2264A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2264A1.txt
  • the verification requirements of �� 64.1110 et seq, including third party verification, for those affected end-users that ultimately select BellSouth as their service provider. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.141, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, 1.3, the waiver request filed by BellSouth Telecommunications, on June 24th, 2003, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Margaret M. Egler, Deputy Chief Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau See 2000 Biennial Review-Review of Policies and Rules
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2292A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2292A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2292A1.txt
  • time. 4. Therefore, we grant the request for review and remand Kohl's application to SLD for consideration. However, by remanding we do not suggest an outcome for Kohl's application. Furthermore, because we have granted Kohl's request for review, we find it unnecessary to consider its waiver request. 5. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. ��0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Rachel Kohl Community Library, Glenn Mills, Pennsylvania, on October 30, 2002 IS GRANTED AND REMANDED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Kathleen Pileggi, Rachel Kohl Community Library, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-22A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-22A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-22A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of MCI WORLDCOM Network Services, Inc. Requesting Waiver of Section 1.718 of the Commission's Rules and an Extension of Time In Which to Convert Its Informal Complaint
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2354A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2354A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2354A1.txt
  • and all parties to the application, will come into compliance with Section 101.1412(a) of the Commission's rules relating to eligibility restrictions for cable operators. Applicants wishing to submit additional information should also include it in Exhibit F. Waivers: Applicants requesting waiver of any rules must submit a statement of reasons sufficient to justify the waiver sought. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925. Certifications: Applicants should carefully read the list of certifications on the FCC Form 175. These certifications help to ensure a fair and competitive auction and require, among other things, disclosure to the Commission of certain information on applicant ownership and agreements or arrangements concerning the auction. Submission of an FCC Form 175 application constitutes a representation by the certifying
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2377A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2377A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2377A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2378A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2378A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2378A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-243A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-243A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-243A1.txt
  • with the program's rules and procedures. The circumstances described by Glover do not constitute special circumstances for purposes of our waiver standard. Therefore, we conclude that Glover has not demonstrated the existence of any special circumstances warranting a deviation from our rules, and we deny its Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Glover Elementary School, Broken Bow, Oklahoma, on January 18, 2002, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Jon Tuck, Glover Elementary School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed January
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-244A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-244A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-244A1.txt
  • insufficient to merit a waiver of the Commission's rules. Therefore, Union Township's claims that its applications were late due to incorrect advice from SLD is insufficient to justify a waiver. We conclude that Union Township has not demonstrated special circumstances upon which its Waiver Request can be granted. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Union Township School, Hampton, New Jersey, on January 16, 2002, is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Michelle Burton, Union Township School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed January
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2482A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2482A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2482A1.txt
  • the portion of its petition seeking waiver of section 54.313 of the Commission's rules. We grant N.E. Colorado Cellular's request for partial withdrawal. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.314(d) of the Commission's rules, filed by N.E. Colorado Cellular, Inc., on February 8, 2002, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2560A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2560A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2560A1.txt
  • Report No. SAT-00145 (rel. April 10, 2003). 47 C.F.R. � 25.117(e) (2002). See EchoStar Milestone Extension Application at 3 (citing Ku-band Authorization Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 20450, para. 16). See id. at 6. �@��� � �@��� �@��� ! % & E M N V ` m � ` `` � � 5 an otherwise unjustified milestone extension). See Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (2001). See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (``WAIT Radio''); Northeast Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (``Northeast Cellular''). Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1157. EchoStar's counsel has indicated that the planned launch date of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2562A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2562A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2562A1.txt
  • Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Elizabeth Stottlemyre, Andrews County Library, to Federal Communications Commission, filed September 9, 2002 (Request for Waiver). Section 54.719(c) of the Commission's rules provides that any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules provides that the Commission may waive its rules on its own motion or on petition if good cause is shown. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See Request for Waiver. Id. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Elizabeth Stottlemyre, Andrews County Library, dated May 8, 2003. Federal Communications Commission DA 03-2562 � ''
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2564A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2564A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2564A1.txt
  • Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Dennis Otwell, DeLeon Independent School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed August 26, 2002 (Request for Waiver). Section 54.719(c) of the Commission's rules provides that any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules provides that the Commission may waive its rules on its own motion or on petition if good cause is shown. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See Request for Waiver. Id. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Dennis Otwell, DeLeon Independent School District, dated May 1, 2003. Federal Communications Commission DA 03-2564 |
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2565A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2565A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2565A1.txt
  • Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Becky Epperson, Grant County Board of Education, to Federal Communications Commission, filed October 16, 2002 (Request for Waiver). Section 54.719(c) of the Commission's rules provides that any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules provides that the Commission may waive its rules on its own motion or on petition if good cause is shown. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See Request for Waiver. Id. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Becky Epperson, Grant County Board of Education, dated May 16, 2003. Federal Communications Commission DA 03-2565
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2566A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2566A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2566A1.txt
  • Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 339 (rel. Dec. 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com. Car. Bur. rel. Dec. 28, 2001 and Jan. 4, 2002). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). Request for Review. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). See Request for Review by Anderson School Staatsburg, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Changes to the Board of Directors of the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., File No. SLD-133664, CC Docket Nos. 96-45 and 97-21, Order, 15 FCC Rcd 25610 (Com. Car. Bur. rel. Nov.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2567A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2567A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2567A1.txt
  • Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Jean Wolfe, Tunbridge Public Library, to Federal Communications Commission, filed October 31, 2002 (Request for Waiver). Section 54.719(c) of the Commission's rules provides that any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules provides that the Commission may waive its rules on its own motion or on petition if good cause is shown. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See Request for Waiver. Id. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Jean Wolfe, Tunbridge Public Library, dated May 8, 2003. Federal Communications Commission DA 03-2567 � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2568A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2568A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2568A1.txt
  • Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Jeff Hathaway, Wareham School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed September 11, 2002 (Request for Waiver). Section 54.719(c) of the Commission's rules provides that any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules provides that the Commission may waive its rules on its own motion or on petition if good cause is shown. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See Request for Waiver. Id. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Jeff Hathaway, Wareham School District, dated May 1, 2003. Federal Communications Commission DA 03-2568 - �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2574A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2574A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2574A1.txt
  • coordinates indicated below. Accordingly, we seek comment on the proposed amendment of the FM Table of Allotments, Section 73.202(b) of the Commission's Rules, with respect to Blanchard and Weatherford, Oklahoma: Community Present Proposed Blanchard, Oklahoma --- 247A Weatherford, Oklahoma 247C1, 286A 286A Proposed Coordinates for Channel 247A at Blanchard, Oklahoma: 35-07-21 NL and 97-40-18 WL, at a site 2.1 km (1.3 miles) southwest of Blanchard. 9. The Commission's authority to institute rule making proceedings, showings required, cut-off procedures, and filing requirements are contained in the attached Appendix and are incorporated by reference herein. In particular, we note that a showing of continuing interest is required in paragraph 2 of the Appendix before a channel will be allotted. 10. Pursuant to Sections
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2582A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2582A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2582A1.txt
  • the thousands of applications SLD processes each year, it is administratively necessary to place the burden of meeting deadlines on the applicants. As we have consistently held in the past, applicants are responsible for submitting their appeals in a timely manner and complying with program rules and procedures. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on April 7, 2003, by School District of Somerset, Somerset, Wisconsin, IS DISMISSED as it relates to the August 6, 2002 decision, IS DENIED as it relates to the February 13, 2003 decision, and the request to waive the 60-day
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2583A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2583A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2583A1.txt
  • Mifflin County not to file an appeal, Commission precedent establishes that where a party has received erroneous advice, the government is not estopped from enforcing its rules in a manner that is inconsistent with the advice provided by the employee, particularly where relief is contrary to a rule. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on February 20, 2002, by Mifflin County Library, Lewistown, Pennsylvania, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2584A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2584A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2584A1.txt
  • 24, 2002. Saint Michael School fails to provide evidence that it did not receive the July 24, 2002 notice. The mere assertion that a letter was not received at the address provided to SLD and to which prior correspondence had been successfully mailed is insufficient grounds for reconsideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Saint Michael School, Chicago, Illinois on March 25, 2003, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2585A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2585A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2585A1.txt
  • interest than strict adherence to the rule. Given the thousands of applications SLD processes each year, it is administratively necessary to place the burden of meeting deadlines on the applicants. Staffing problems do not rise to the level of special circumstances required for a deviation from the rule. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on February 20, 2002, by Bemus Point Central School District, Bemus Point, New York, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Susan G. Gauch, Bemus Point Central School
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2586A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2586A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2586A1.txt
  • Park). Galena Park seeks a waiver of the deadline for requests for review of decisions by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company. Since Galena Park timely filed their appeal and offered evidence thereof, we dismiss as moot Galena Park's Request for Waiver. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. ��0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed by Galena Park Independent School District is DISMISSED AS MOOT. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Jeffrey Lorentz, Galena Park Independent School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed May 27,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2587A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2587A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2587A1.txt
  • a misunderstanding of program rules is not a special circumstance warranting a waiver of the filing window. Further, we have consistently held in the past that it is the applicant who has responsibility ultimately for the timely submission of the application. Therefore, we deny the Waiver Request. 4. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by the Saint Katherine Drexel School on July 3, 2002 is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Rev. Kevin P. Murray, Saint Katherine Drexel School, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2588A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2588A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2588A1.txt
  • deviation from the general rule and such deviation would better serve the public interest than strict adherence to the general rule. Here, Twin Hills fails to present good cause as to why it should receive a waiver of the filing requirements. Therefore, we deny the Waiver Request. 4. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. ��0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Twin Hills School, Okmulgee, Oklahoma, on August 19, 2002 is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Donna Martin, Twin Hills School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed August 19, 2002
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2617A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2617A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2617A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2618A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2618A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2618A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2624A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2624A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2624A1.txt
  • ITU priority, earth station licensees communicating with Telstar 13 must terminate immediately any operations that cause harmful interference. ALSAT-designated earth stations are not authorized to use Telstar 13 to provide any Direct-to-Home (``DTH'') service, Direct Broadcast Satellite (``DBS'') service, or Digital Audio Radio Service (``DARS'') to, from, or within the United States. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (2001), ALSAT designated earth stations ARE GRANTED a waiver of Sections 25.114(c)(13) and (17), 25.137(b), 25.140, and 25.210(a)(3) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 25.114(c)(13) and (17), 25.137(b), 25.140, and 25.210(a)(3) (2001), subject to the conditions set forth in this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Telstar 13 satellite, together
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2627A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2627A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2627A1.txt
  • CONCLUSION AND ORDERING CLAUSES 12. Based on the foregoing, we conclude that there is no justification for granting reconsideration of the Second Round Assignment of Geostationary Satellite Orbit Locations in the Ka-band Order. 13. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that the Petition for Reconsideration filed by the National Rural Telecommunications Cooperative is DENIED. 14. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that current Ka-band GSO FSS licensees ARE GRANTED waivers of Sections 25.155, 25.156, and 25.158 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 25.155, 25.156, 25.158, to the extent necessary, for a period ending 14 days after the release date of this Order, for the purposes set forth in this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2649A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2649A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2649A1.txt
  • we deny Alascom's petition asking us to waive the Commission rule requiring Alascom to file a 2002 tariff for its common carrier services. ORDERING Clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), (j), 201, 202, and 203 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), (j), 201, 202, and 203 and sections 0.291 and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.291 and 1.3, Alascom's petition for waiver of the 2002 annual tariff filing requirement in section 61.58(e)(3) of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR � 61.58(e)(3), IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Alascom SHALL FILE 2003 revised rates based on current cost for services offered pursuant to Tariff FCC No. 11 no later
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2688A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2688A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2688A1.txt
  • limitations of the satellite. BSS further states that in the near future it intends to deploy and co-locate a new satellite with MEASAT-2 at 148� E.L. that will meet all the Section 25.210 requirements. BSS Petition at 4-5; Appendix A at 2-3. 47 C.F.R. �� 25.210(a)(2), (3). 47 C.F.R. �� 25.210(e), (f), (g). 47 C.F.R. �� 25.210(f), g). 47 C.F.R. �1.3. Licensing of Space Stations in the Domestic Fixed-Satellite Service, FCC 83-184 (Aug. 16, 1983), at para. 32 (Two-Degree Spacing Order). Id. at paras. 33-43. See In The Matter Of Amendment Of Part 25 Of The Commission's Rules And Regulations To Reduce Alien Carrier Interference Between Fixed-Satellites At Reduced Orbital Spacings And To Revise Application Processing Procedures For Satellite Communication Services,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2736A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2736A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2736A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2738A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2738A2.txt
  • Line_Limit 90 Line_Fill 113 Block_Divide_Factor 1 Cluster_Algorithm 4 Optimization_Method 1000 Maximum_populated_cells 1 Use_hcpm.mdb 1 True-up_line_counts Federal Communications Commission DA 03-2738 APPENDIX G MSM Loop Input Modifications � HCPM Inputs 15 Feeder / Distribution Inputs Value Variable Name Comments 0.5 max_drop_length 0.5 user_lambda 12 copper_gauge_xover 12 max_copper_distance 1.25 MaxCopperPenalty 12 copper_t1_xover 0 t1_fiber_xover 1.25 t1_redundancy_factor 24 copper_placement_depth 36 fiber_placement_depth 3 CriticalWaterDepth 1.3 WaterFactor 12 MinSlopeTrigger 1.10 MinSlopeFactor 30 MaxSlopeTrigger 1.05 MaxSlopeFactor 1.20 CombSlopeFactor 0.0000% pct_ds1 0.00% pct_lsa 24 ChannelsPerT1System 2 PairsPerT1System 4 FibersPerTerminal 2016 CapacityF2016 1344 CapacityF1344 672 CapacityF672 96 CapacityF96 24 CapacityF24 96 CapacityT96 24 CapacityT24 10 lines_per_bus 1.00 DistRoadFactor 1.00 FiberFillFactor 1 DistanceType 1.00 FeederRoadFactor 2 Max_SAIsMaximum number of SAI's placed in a cluster Federal Communications Commission DA 03-2738 APPENDIX
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2745A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2745A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2745A1.txt
  • compliance with the verification requirements of �� 64.1100-1190, including third party verification, for those affected end-users that ultimately select BellSouth as their service provider. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.141, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, 1.3, the waiver request filed by BellSouth Telecommunications, on June 24th, 2003, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Margaret M. Egler, Deputy Chief Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau See 2000 Biennial Review-Review of Policies and Rules
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2765A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2765A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2765A1.txt
  • reseller to obtain a CIC. In particular, a waiver is not required for American Telnet to apply for the 0307 CIC. Once the FGD requirement was eliminated for switchless resellers, American Telnet had the opportunity to apply for the 0307 CIC, or any other CIC. ORdering Clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and1.2 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.2, that American Telnet's Petition is DIMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Eric Einhorn Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau See American Telnet's Request for Declaratory Ruling and/or Rule Waiver, filed August 2, 2001 (Petition); American Telnet's Amendment to Emergency Request for Declaratory Ruling and or Rule Waiver, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2766A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2766A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2766A1.txt
  • No. SAT-MOD-20030507-00097 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Telstar 8 satellite must be constructed and launched by the following dates in accordance with the technical parameters and terms of its authorization, as modified, or its authorization is null and void: Complete Construction: Launch: June 30, 2004 September 30, 2004 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that Loral SpaceCom Corporation DIP's request for a waiver of 47 C.F.R. � 25.210(e) and (g), IS GRANTED, with respect to coverage of South America as set forth in Loral SpaceCom Corporation's modification application, File No. SAT-MOD-19991102-00106, and the portions of that application deferred in Loral SpaceCom Corp. and Loral Space and Communications Corp., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 18 FCC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2834A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2834A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2834A1.txt
  • October 1, 2003. We also direct USAC to true up support amounts as necessary when Qwest files its loop cost data for 2002. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 36.611 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 36.611, filed by Qwest Communications on July 29, 2003, IS GRANTED, as described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau See Letter from R. William Johnston, Executive Director -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2835A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2835A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2835A1.txt
  • T-Mobile Bid Withdrawal Waiver Request at iii, 11-15. See Petition of Leap Wireless International, Inc. For a Declaratory Ruling or, in the Alternative, For a Waiver of the Commission's Withdrawal Penalty Rules, and Comments in Support of VoiceStream PCS BTA I License Corporation (filed Feb. 26, 2003). 47 C.F.R. � 1.2104(g)(1). 47 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(3)(i). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (waiver of rules for good cause). 47 C.F.R. � 1.2104(g)(1). See Implementation of Section 309(j) of the Communications Act - Competitive Bidding, Second Report and Order, 9 FCC Rcd 2348, 2373-74 �� 150-153 (1994) (``Competitive Bidding Second Report and Order'') (establishing bid withdrawal payment requirement). Id. Id. See Auction No. 35 Procedures Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd at 19,520-21 (bid
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2862A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2862A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2862A1.txt
  • boxes at issue may not meet the tolerances prescribed in the rules for separation between the audio and visual carriers at subscriber terminals. Petitioners assert that the deviation beyond tolerance is small, not perceivable by television viewers, and will not have an adverse impact on the quality of signal received by consumers. Petitioner seeks both permanent relief pursuant to Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 & 76.7, and interim relief pursuant to Section 1.45(d) and (e) of the Commission's rule, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.45(d) - (e). Comments and oppositions to the request for permanent relief are due within 30 days from the date of this Public Notice. Petitioner's reply is due 20 days thereafter. Comments
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2866A6.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2866A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2866A6.txt
  • may access the FCC Automated Auction System via the FCC Wide Area Network. Minimum Hardware and Software Requirements The following hardware and software, at a minimum, are required to use the FCC Bidding System: CPU: Pentium 133 or above RAM: 32 MB (64 MB recommended) Monitor: VGA or above Mouse or other pointing device "! higher, with Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1_08. Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1_08 is available for downloading at http://java.sun.com/products/archive/index.html In addition, users accessing the FCC Auctions Bidding System via the FCC's Wide Area Network will need: Modem: 28.8 Kbps Hayes(c) compatible modem or faster (56 Kbps recommended) Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) Dialer: Use the Dial-Up Networking feature included with the operating system Connecting to the FCC Wide Area Network To
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2880A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2880A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2880A1.txt
  • of disputes, and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2881A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2881A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2881A1.txt
  • of disputes, and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2917A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2917A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2917A1.txt
  • both impractical and unreasonable, as well as the Commission's and the Bureau's long-standing policy of ensuring that applicants for non-recurring services are not penalized for delays that are not within their control. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1-4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 U.S.C. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) that the request for waiver of section 54.507(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.507(d), filed by Chicago Public Schools, Chicago, Illinois on May 15, 2003, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2918A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2918A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2918A1.txt
  • both impractical and unreasonable, as well as the Commission's and the Bureau's long-standing policy of ensuring that applicants for non-recurring services are not penalized for delays that are not within their control. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1-4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 U.S.C. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) that the request for waiver of section 54.507(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.507(d), filed by the Edcouch-Elsa Independent School District, Edcouch, Texas on November 1, 2002, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Funding Year 2001 deadline
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2941A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2941A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2941A1.txt
  • for the U.S.-Tanzania route because of the difficulty in demonstrating that at least fifty percent of the settled U.S.-billed traffic between the United States and Tanzania is being settled at or below the relevant benchmark rates as established in In the Matter of International Settlement Rates, IB Docket 96-261, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 19,806 (1997). Pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, AT&T states that there is good cause to waive for the U.S.-Tanzania route the requirement in Section 63.16 of the Commission's rules and requests ISR designation for the above-named foreign points. Interested parties may file comments regarding or petitions to deny the applications no later than October 24, 2003. Oppositions or responses
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2942A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2942A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2942A1.txt
  • to Petition to Deny. On February 2, 1996, Grand Alliance requested an extension of time to file a reply to the Opposition to Petition to Deny. On February 12, 1996, Grand Alliance submitted its Reply to TVC's Opposition to Petition to Deny. Petition at 1. Grand Alliance's application is pending. (FCC File No. 5455-CM-P-83). Petition at 5-7. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. 47 C.F.R. � 73.3566(a). This rule is applicable to ITFS licensees. See 47 C.F.R. � 74.910. WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (citing Rio Grande Family Radio Fellowship, Inc. v. FCC, 406 F.2d 664 (D.C. Cir. 1968) (per curiam)). Industrial Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 437 F.2d 680 (D.C. Cir. 1970) (per curiam). E and F
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2964A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2964A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2964A1.txt
  • burden of meeting deadlines on the applicants. As we have consistently held in the past, applicants are responsible for submitting their appeals in a timely manner and complying with program rules and procedures. Brady ISD has not presented special circumstances that would justify a waiver in this instance. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on May 27, 2003, by Brady Independent School District, Brady, Texas, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2966A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2966A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2966A1.txt
  • For a review of decisions by SLD, appeals to the Commission must be filed within 60 days of the issuance of the SLD decision date. Here, Paramus filed its appeal on September 3, 2003, after the 60-day period, in contravention of our rules. We therefore dismiss the appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on September 3, 2003, by Thomas Communications & Technology, on behalf of Paramus School District, Syracuse, New York, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Michelle Chemotti, Thomas
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2968A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2968A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2968A1.txt
  • division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See In the Matter of Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221 (2003). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). Request for Review. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). See Request for Review by Anderson School Staatsburg, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Changes to the Board of Directors of the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., File No. SLD-133664, CC Docket Nos. 96-45 and 97-21, Order, 15 FCC Rcd 25610, 25612-25613 (Com. Car. Bur. 2000).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2969A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2969A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2969A1.txt
  • a review of decisions by SLD, appeals to the Commission must be filed within 60 days of the issuance of the SLD decision date. Here, Edwin Gould filed its appeal on June 17, 2003, after the 60-day period, in contravention of our rules. We therefore dismiss the appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on June 17, 2003, by Edwin Gould Academy, Chestnut Ridge, New York, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Mary Ann Dowling, Edwin Gould Academy, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3003A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3003A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3003A1.txt
  • Rcd 17457 (1997); Updated Filing Requirements for Bell Operating Company Applications Under Section 271 of the Communications Act, Public Notice, DA 99-1994 (Com Car. Bur. Sept. 28, 1999); Updated Filing Requirements for Bell Operating Company Applications Under Section 271 of the Communications Act, Public Notice, 18 FCC Rcd 12203 (Com. Car. Bur. 2001) (collectively ``271 Procedural Public Notices''). See section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Ameritech Michigan Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 20575, para. 57; Application of Bell Atlantic New York for Authorization Under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-Region, InterLATA Service in the State of New York, CC Docket No. 99-295, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 3953, 3968, para. 34 (1999).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3016A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3016A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3016A1.txt
  • will still be required to comply with all other requirements as provided in Section 64.1200(a)(6) by the scheduled effective date of October 1, 2003. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4 and 227 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 227, and the authority delegated under sections 0.141, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, 1.3, the waiver request relating to 47 C.F.R. � 64.1200(a)(6) filed by Worldcom, Inc. d/b/a MCI on August 27, 2003 IS GRANTED until December 1, 2003, to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Dane Snowden Chief, Consumer &
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3022A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3022A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3022A1.txt
  • and Commission staff on Tuesday, October 14, 2003 at 11:00. Counsel for Complainants will establish a telephone bridge for this call, and inform the Defendant and Commission staff of the call-in information. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3047A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3047A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3047A1.txt
  • responsible for submitting their appeals in a timely manner and complying with program rules and procedures. In this instance, NCOCC failed to comply with the deadline. This failure based on NCOCC misunderstanding of the timing deadline does not constitute special circumstance to justify a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on April 21, 2003, by North Central Ohio Computer Cooperative, Mansfield, Ohio, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3048A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3048A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3048A1.txt
  • to review this evidence in the first instance and determine what amount of funding, if any, is supported by new bills, we remand the application to SLD for consideration of FRN 509548. We affirm SLD's conclusion, however, that the ultimate burden of proving eligibility remains with the applicant. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the request filed by DeLeon Independent School District, DeLeon, Texas, on March 13, 2002, is GRANTED and this application is REMANDED to SLD for further action consistent with this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3050A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3050A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3050A1.txt
  • the Funding Commitment Decision Letter by periodically checking SLD's website or contacting SLD directly. Either method would have apprised it of the funding decision in time to meet all applicable deadlines. Therefore, we conclude that Smithton has failed to demonstrate circumstances that would warrant waiver of the deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by School District, Smithton, Missouri, on November 5, 2002, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Bill Hadlow, Smithton School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed November 5,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3051A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3051A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3051A1.txt
  • the timely submission of the application. Finally, Kansas's assertion that denial of its application may have a detrimental impact on schools within its borders does not create the special circumstances or particular facts that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. Therefore, we deny the Waiver Request. 4. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by the Southwest Kansas Educational Consortium on July 11, 2002 is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Carol J. Swinney, Southwest Kansas Educational Consortium, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3052A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3052A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3052A1.txt
  • the timely submission of the application. Finally, Warren's assertion that denial of its application may have a detrimental impact on schools within its borders does not create the special circumstances or particular facts that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. Therefore, we deny the Waiver Request. 4. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. ��0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Warren County School District on October 4, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Amy Stewart, Warren County School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed October 4, 2002
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3053A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3053A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3053A1.txt
  • services and Internet access, stating that the Commission may not waive a statutory deadline such as the October 28, 2001 deadline. Similarly, Gowanda seeks discounts for telecommunications services and Internet access. We conclude that our determination in the East Carroll Order applies to the instant Request for Waiver. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3,and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed by Western New York Regional Information Center on behalf of Gowanda Central School District, West Seneca, New York on December 16, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3054A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3054A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3054A1.txt
  • year and by filing the corrected version shortly after being apprised of the mistake. Moreover, the deadline involved a first-time information request. Woodburn also sought discounts only for telecommunications services, and the Commission has authority to waive the deadline with respect to requests that involve only telecommunications services. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed by Woodburn School District, Woodburn, Oregon on November 27, 2002 IS GRANTED and REMANDED TO SLD to the extent provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau See Letter from Paul
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3121A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3121A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3121A1.txt
  • of receiving notice of the proposed appointment of an individual as a security director, the Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Department of Defense, or Department of Homeland Security may object to the appointment, requiring rescission of the appointment and appointment of another candidate. See id. at Art. 3.16. See id. at Art. 5.2. See also id. at Art. 1.3 (which defines ``control'' to include the power to reach certain decisions as well as de facto and de jure control) and at Art. 1.5 (defining de facto and de jure control). See id. at Art. 8.19. See id. at Art. 7.3. Article 7.3 reserves a right to object if, inter alia, there is a material increase in the authority of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3121A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3121A3.txt
  • post cut-through dial digit extraction, in-band and out-of-band signaling, and party add, drop and hold. 1.2. "Classified Information" means any information that has been determined pursuant to Executive Order 12958, or any predecessor or successor order, u the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, or any statute that succeeds or amends the Atomic Energy Act, to require protection against unauthorized disclosure. 1.3. "Control" and `Controls" means the power, direct or indirect, whether or not exercised, and whether or not exercised or exercisable through the ownership of a majority or a dominant minority of the total outstanding voting securities of an entity, or by proxy voting, contractual arrangements, or other means, to determine, direct, or decide matters affecting anentity; in particular, but without
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3182A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3182A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3182A1.txt
  • a waiver is warranted. In view of the foregoing, we conclude that a waiver is not warranted under the circumstances presented. We also conclude that the licenses for Stations WNC270, WNC271, and WNC272 should be deemed forfeited. Accordingly IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the request for waiver jointly filed by Alma College, Mount Pleasant Baptist Academy, Mount Pleasant Public Schools, and Central Michigan University on June 22, 1998 IS DISMISSED AS MOOT with respect to Station WNC273 and is otherwise DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3184A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3184A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3184A1.txt
  • units. If Pace and the cable operators intend to deploy those units without bringing them into compliance, Pace must provide a compelling reason why the waiver should apply to those units. Grant of this interim waiver does not absolve Pace and the cable operators of this violation. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 0.61, 0.283, and 1.3 of the Commission's Rules; 47 C.F.R. �� 0.61, 0.283, & 1.3; the petition of Pace Micro Technology PLC on behalf of itself and Time Warner Cable and Comcast Cable Communications, Inc., for an interim waiver of Section 76.605(a)(2) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 76.605(a)(2) IS GRANTED for Pace Models 510 and 510A set top boxes deployed in subscribers
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3197A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3197A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3197A1.txt
  • Border, coordination with the Government of Mexico was mandatory. As a result of this coordination, the Secretaria de Comunicaciones Y Transporte ("SCT") informed the Commission that it objected to the grant of the proposed facility on channel 53 because it did not offer protection to channel 56 of Ciudad Juarez, Mexico, and thus, did not fulfill the disposition of paragraph 1.3 in the 1988 Agreement Amending the Agreement Relating to Assignments and Usage of Television Broadcasting Channels in the Frequency Range 470-806 MHz (channels 14-69) ("the 1988 Agreement") throughout the Mexico-United States border. Subsequently, the staff dismissed the application. While that application was pending, however, Council Tree filed an application for a television booster station on channel 48, which was granted
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-31A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-31A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-31A1.txt
  • its behalf, even when such persons are away from the office on medical leave or otherwise incapacitated. Here, Blessed Sacrament fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on September 16, 2002, by Blessed Sacrament Catholic School, Newark, New Jersey, as well as the request to waive the deadline for filing its appeal with SLD ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3217A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3217A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3217A1.txt
  • in beams serving widely separate areas. 47 C.F.R. �� 25.210(g)(1) and (g)(2). See HISPASAT-1D Permitted List Petition at 2 (unnumbered). In its request, HISPASAT states that the majority of the power of the HISPASAT-1D satellite is used to provide European coverage, thus leaving insufficient power to employ full-frequency reuse in HISPASAT-1D's coverage of the United States. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (WAIT Radio); Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. See also Comsat Corporation, Petition for Partial Relief from the Current Regulatory Treatment of Comsat World Systems' Switched Voice, Private Line, and Video and Audio Services,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3222A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3222A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3222A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3223A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3223A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3223A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3235A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3235A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3235A1.txt
  • and all parties to the application, will come into compliance with Section 101.1412(a) of the Commission's rules relating to eligibility restrictions for cable operators. Applicants wishing to submit additional information should also include it in Exhibit F. Waivers: Applicants requesting waiver of any rules must submit a statement of reasons sufficient to justify the waiver sought. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925. Certifications: Applicants should carefully read the list of certifications on the FCC Form 175. These certifications help to ensure a fair and competitive auction and require, among other things, disclosure to the Commission of certain information on applicant ownership and agreements or arrangements concerning the auction. Submission of an FCC Form 175 application constitutes a representation by the certifying
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-328A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-328A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-328A1.txt
  • 8183 �� 2-4. Request for Extension at 12-13 (citing GE Americom Satcom H-1 Order, 7 FCC Rcd 5169). GE Americom Satcom H-1 Order, 7 FCC Rcd at 5170 � 9-10. GE Americom Ka-band Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 11041 � 8 (citing Advanced Order, 10 FCC Rcd at � 14 (quoting Tempo Order, 1 FCC Rcd 20)). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (2002). Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972). Modification Request at 43. Assignment of Orbital Locations to Space Stations in the Domestic Fixed-Satellite Service, Order and Authorization, 11 FCC Rcd 13788 (Int'l Bur. 1996). Assignment of Orbital
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3463A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3463A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3463A1.txt
  • Dickey LaMoure Multidistrict Special Education, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed March 12, 2002. See Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Rhoda Young, Dickey LaMoure Multidistrict Special Education, dated June 24, 2002. Id. See Request for Review. Id. Id. See Dickey LaMoure Form 471. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). See Request for Review by Anderson School Staatsburg, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Changes to the Board of Directors of the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., File No. SLD-133664, CC Docket Nos. 96-45 and 97-21, Order, 15 FCC Rcd 25610 (Com. Car. Bur. rel. Nov.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3468A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3468A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3468A1.txt
  • if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, and such deviation would better serve the public interest than strict adherence to the general rule. Magen David fails to demonstrate special circumstances warranting a waiver our rules. Therefore, we affirm SLD and deny the Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Magen David Yeshiva, Brooklyn, New York on October 24, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Sheila Rubin, Magen David Yeshiva, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3471A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3471A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3471A1.txt
  • the Commission's competitive bidding rules. Pittsylvania may extend their existing contracts for non-recurring services for FRN 260055 voluntarily until September 30, 2004, without having to comply with the Commission's competitive bidding process. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1-4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 U.S.C. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) that the request for waiver of section 54.507(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.507(d), filed by Pittsylvania County Schools, Chatham, Virginia on December 20, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3472A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3472A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3472A1.txt
  • the general rule, and such deviation would better serve the public interest than strict adherence to the general rule. Prospect Sierra has not presented any arguments or unique circumstances that would warrant granting a waiver of this rule. Therefore, we affirm SLD and deny the Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Prospect Sierra School, El Cerrito, California, on July 2, 2002, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Dena Watson-Lamprey, Prospect Sierra School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3473A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3473A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3473A1.txt
  • and making a good faith effort, they do not demonstrate sufficient grounds to justify waiver of the Commission's rules. The Bureau has consistently declined to waive the Commission's rules based on an applicant's misunderstanding of the rules. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Roselle Catholic High School, Roselle, New Jersey, on August 6, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Alan MacDonell, Roselle Catholic High School, to the Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3474A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3474A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3474A1.txt
  • and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Susan Conrad, St. John Vianney High School, dated August 16, 2001 (Administrator's Decision on Waiver Request). SLD directs entities that request such waivers to appeal directly to the Commission, because it lacks authority to waive the Commission's rules even in cases supported by a showing of good cause. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (stating the Commission can waive its rules). However, because St. John does not ask for a waiver of the rules but, instead, for review of SLD's determination, we address the merits of St. John's appeal. See Request for Review. Section 54.719(c) of the Commission's rules provides that any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3475A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3475A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3475A1.txt
  • fraud and waste, serves as an additional means of holding applicants accountable for their representations, and assists in the efficient administration of the program. By failing to submit a signature certification, Syracuse-Dunbar omitted the legally binding act that signifies compliance with program rules. We therefore deny Syracuse-Dunbar's request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. ��0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Syracuse-Dunbar-Avoca School District on March 26, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Rod Powell, Syracuse-Dunbar-Avoca School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed March 26, 2002 (Waiver Request).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3496A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3496A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3496A1.txt
  • compliance with the verification requirements of �� 64.1100-1190, including third party verification, for those affected end-users that ultimately select BellSouth as their service provider. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.141, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, 1.3, the waiver request filed by BellSouth Telecommunications, on October 14, 2003, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Nancy A. Stevenson, Acting Deputy Chief, Policy Division Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau See 2000 Biennial Review-Review of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3499A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3499A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3499A1.txt
  • station airs an analog signal), and to 100% on April 1, 2005. Stations, both commercial and NCE, that have been granted an extension of time to construct their DTV facilities must comply with the minimum digital operation requirements in effect at the time the station commences digital operations. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the Request for Temporary Waiver of DTV Simulcasting Requirements filed by Twin Cities Public Television, Inc. IS GRANTED to the extent described herein. This action is taken pursuant to authority delegated by Sections 0.61(h) and 0.283 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.61(h), 0.283. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION W. Kenneth Ferree Chief,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3507A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3507A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3507A1.txt
  • station airs an analog signal), and to 100% on April 1, 2005. Stations, both commercial and NCE, that have been granted an extension of time to construct their DTV facilities must comply with the minimum digital operation requirements in effect at the time the station commences digital operations. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the Request for Waiver of DTV Simulcasting Requirements filed by South Texas Public Broadcasting System, Inc. IS GRANTED to the extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Request for Waiver of DTV Simulcasting Requirements filed by Washburn University of Topeka IS GRANTED IN PART to the extent described herein. IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-351A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-351A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-351A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that Notesan's Request for Waiver of Commission Rule 1.718(a) IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section 1.718 of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3522A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3522A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3522A1.txt
  • Sunday, and that applicants should ensure that if they could not obtain a postmark on that date, they should postmark their application on Saturday, October 27, 2001 at the latest. Because Barre has failed to demonstrate circumstances that would warrant waiver of the deadline, we affirm SLD's decision. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3,and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Barre Supervisory Union District No. 61, Barre, Vermont, on November 12, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Stephen T. Bartlett, Barre Supervisory Union District No. 61,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3523A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3523A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3523A1.txt
  • rules and procedures. In order for the program to work efficiently, the applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of correct application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Crispus Attucks fails to demonstrate a sufficient basis for waiving the Commission's filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Crispus Attucks YouthBuild Charter School, York, Pennsylvania, on June 14, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Chris Ginder, Crispus Attucks YouthBuild Charter School, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3524A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3524A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3524A1.txt
  • a paper copy of the Block 6 Certification, completed and signed. The record shows that Lynn failed to submit a Block 6 Certification. Thus, Lynn's arguments relating to a server error fail to address the problem of the missing Block 6 Certification. Therefore, we deny Lynn's Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Lynn Public Library, Mt. Victory, Ohio, on January 29, 2002, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Gerard Fallon, Lynn Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed February
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3525A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3525A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3525A1.txt
  • on or after August 13, 2001, appeals to the Commission must be filed within 60 days of the issuance of the SLD decision date. Here, Memphis City filed its appeal on May 27, 2003, after the 60-day period, in contravention of our rules. We therefore dismiss the appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Memphis City School District, Memphis, Tennessee on May 27, 2003, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from William Hazelton, Memphis City School District, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3527A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3527A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3527A1.txt
  • to comply with our rules and procedures. As for White Plains contention that the flow of information regarding deadlines was interrupted, the FCC has found that confusion about the program's requirements is not grounds for a waiver of the filing window. Therefore, we deny the Waiver Request. 4. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by White Plains City School District, White Plains, New York, on January 6, 2003, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Richard C. Lasselle, White Plains City School District,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3563A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3563A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3563A1.txt
  • Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Department of Defense, or Department of Homeland Security may object to the appointment, requiring rescission of the appointment and appointment of another candidate. See id. at Art. 3.16. See also id. at Art. 1.5 (defining ``data centers'') and at Art. 1.12 (defining ``domestic communications infrastructure''). See id. at Art. 5.2. See also id. at Art. 1.3 (which defines ``control'' to include the power to reach certain decisions as well as de facto and de jure control). See Foreign Participation Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 23919-21, �� 61-66. See id. at 23919, � 62. See id. at 23920-21, � 65. See Petition to Adopt Conditions at 5. See CNMI House of Representatives' Letter at 2 (stating that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-358A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-358A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-358A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Third Consent Motion of Complainant For Extension of Time In Which To Convert Informal Complaint To Formal Complaint and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3595A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3595A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3595A1.txt
  • with sufficient time to devote their resources to reaching a settlement within the time estimated by the parties, yet establishes a reasonable deadline in the event that such an agreement proves unobtainable. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3613A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3613A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3613A1.txt
  • standard was employed by the Bureau. The statement in the MO&O that ``[g]rant of the Access 220 waiver request thus meets our section 1.925 waiver requirements'' sufficiently makes clear that the waiver request meets the waiver standard under Section 1.925 of the Commission's Rules. Moreover, there is no substantive difference between the waiver standard enunciated under Section 1.925 and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules. We also disagree with Petitioners' main argument that the Bureau did not explain why Access 220 ``is entitled to the grant.'' The MO&O specifically addresses the Commission's waiver standard and details the reasons why Access 220's request met that standard. Indeed, the MO&O states that a grant of the waiver ``would further the public interest by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3631A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3631A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3631A1.txt
  • the thousands of applications SLD processes each year, it is administratively necessary to place the burden of meeting deadlines on the applicants. As we have consistently held in the past, applicants are responsible for submitting their appeals in a timely manner and complying with program rules and procedures. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on August 25, 2003, by Cedar County Library District, Stockton, Missouri, IS DISMISSED, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3632A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3632A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3632A1.txt
  • responsible for submitting their appeals in a timely manner and complying with program rules and procedures. Merely stating that a letter was not received in a timely manner at the address provided to SLD and to which prior correspondence had been successfully mailed is insufficient grounds for reconsideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on August 19, 2003, by Monmouth Ocean Educational Services Commission, Tinton Falls, New Jersey, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3663A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3663A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3663A1.txt
  • station airs an analog signal), and to 100% on April 1, 2005. Stations, both commercial and NCE, that have been granted an extension of time to construct their DTV facilities must comply with the minimum digital operation requirements in effect at the time the station commences digital operations. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the Requests for Waiver of DTV Simulcasting Requirements filed by the Board of Regents of the University of New Mexico and Board of Education of the City of Albuquerque, New Mexico, the Regents of New Mexico State University, and Eastern New Mexico University ARE GRANTED to the extent described herein. This action
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3681A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3681A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3681A1.txt
  • For a review of decisions by SLD, appeals to SLD must be filed within 60 days of the issuance of the SLD decision date. Here, West Harvey-Dixmoor filed its appeal to SLD after the 60-day period, in contravention of our rules. We therefore deny the Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on August 6, 2003, by West Harvey-Dixmoor Public School District #147, Harvey, Illinois, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Garvin Burton, West Harvey-Dixmoor Public School District #147,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-36A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-36A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-36A1.txt
  • behalf, even when such persons are away from the office on medical leave or otherwise incapacitated. Here, St. Patrick School fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed on September 26, 2002, by St. Patrick School, Jersey City, New Jersey, as well as the request to waive the deadline for filing its appeal with SLD ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-371A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-371A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-371A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of MCI WORLDCOM Network Services, Inc. Requesting Waiver of Section 1.718 of the Commission's Rules and an Extension of Time In Which to Convert Its Informal Complaint
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-372A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-372A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-372A1.txt
  • a resubmission period to make minor corrections. During each filing period, submitted applications may be updated and amended multiple times until the filing deadline. Software Requirements Applicants will need to meet the following minimum software requirements: Web Browser, either of the following: Microsoft(R) Internet Explorer 4.0 or higher (recommended). Your browser must have either Microsoft VM or Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1 installed. eader 5.0 or higher (available at http://www.adobe.com) If you wish to use the download feature on the Search Results page, you will need a .tar file extraction utility, e.g., Winzip (available at http://www.winzip.com) or Pkzip for Windows (available at http://www.pkware.com/shareware). Submitting FCC Form 175 Applications You can submit FCC Form 175 applications electronically via the Internet. Start your web
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3744A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3744A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3744A1.txt
  • resources in the same rate center as the small carrier as well as markets where large carriers do not hold a CMRS license. Id. The Bureau declines to address these issues because the Bureau believes that such issues are best addressed outside of the context of a waiver petition. Michigan Commission Comments at 2. Id. at 3. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972) (WAIT Radio). Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (Northeast Cellular). WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1159; Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1157. Id. at 1159. See Waiver Petition at 7. Id.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3749A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3749A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3749A1.txt
  • be frustrated, or that the grant would be in the public interest. Alternatively, an applicant's request for waiver may also be granted if in view of the unique or unusual factual circumstances of the instant case, application of the rules would be inequitable, unduly burdensome or contrary to the public interest or the applicant has no reasonable alternative. Additionally, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules provides authority for a rule waiver upon a showing of good cause. First, AAR seeks a waiver of sections 90.713(a) and 90.717(b) of the Commission's rules, both of which restrict the spectrum covered by the License to commercial use only. We grant AAR's request because of the special circumstances detailed in the waiver request and because
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-379A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-379A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-379A1.txt
  • on the form merely serves as a general guide for average completion, and some applications may take longer. In light of these considerations, we conclude that Lacey has not demonstrated the existence of special circumstances warranting a deviation from our rules, and therefore, we deny its Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Lacey Township School District, Lanoka Harbor, New Jersey, on January 24, 2002, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from William R. Lake, Lacey Township School District, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-380A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-380A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-380A1.txt
  • the competitive process, Siskiyou should have been able to turn to other bidders for better service if its choice of provider was not satisfactory. After reviewing the material before us, we conclude that Siskiyou has failed to demonstrate special circumstances upon which its Waiver Request can be granted. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Siskiyou Count Library, Yreka, California, on April 26, 2002, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Pat Harper and Kathy Fueston, Siskiyou County Library, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-383A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-383A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-383A1.txt
  • general rule. We conclude that the particular facts of this case do not rise to the level of special circumstances required for a deviation from the general rule. Craig County's inadvertent omission of necessary information from its October Form 486 does not constitute good cause for a waiver. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Craig County Public Schools, New Castle, Virginia on July 22, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Adele Morris, Craig County Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed July 22,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3849A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3849A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3849A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3850A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3850A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3850A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-390A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-390A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-390A2.txt
  • (``Benchmarks Order'')(``We reiterate that our goal is ultimately to achieve settlement rates that are cost-based.'') (Commission's list of international routes that satisfy criteria for relief from the International Settlements Policy and associated filing requirements, Nov. 26, 2002.) ISP Reform Order, 14 FCC Rcd. 7963, � 30 (1999). Id. Any such notice and comment period should be brief. Pursuant to Rule 1.3, the Commission may waive any rule for good cause, and AT&T submits that ample cause has been shown here for a very short notice and comment period. E.g., AT&T Corp v. Ameritech, 13 FCC Rcd. 14508, 14511 (1998) (describing expedited procedures under which oppositions were filed within seven days and replies were filed two days later). These U.S. carriers also
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-395A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-395A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-395A1.txt
  • adhering strictly to its filing deadlines. As we have consistently held in the past, it is the applicant who has responsibility ultimately for the timely submission of its appeals. Therefore, we conclude that Columbus Unified has failed to demonstrate special circumstances upon which its request can be granted. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed on December 2, 2002, by Columbus Unified School District 493, Lawrence, Kansas, as well as the request to waive the deadline for filing its appeal with SLD are DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3968A6.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3968A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3968A6.txt
  • may access the FCC Automated Auction System via the FCC Wide Area Network. Minimum Hardware and Software Requirements The following hardware and software, at a minimum, are required to use the FCC Bidding System: CPU: Pentium 133 or above RAM: 32 MB (64 MB recommended) Monitor: VGA or above Mouse or other pointing device "! higher, with Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1_08. Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1_08 is available for downloading at http://java.sun.com/products/archive/index.html In addition, users accessing the FCC Auctions Bidding System via the FCC's Wide Area Network will need: Modem: 28.8 Kbps Hayes(c) compatible modem or faster (56 Kbps recommended) Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) Dialer: Use the Dial-Up Networking feature included with the operating system Connecting to the FCC Wide Area Network To
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-396A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-396A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-396A1.txt
  • 17 FCC Rcd 339 (Com. Car. Bur. rel. December 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com. Car. Bur. rel. December 28, 2001 and January 4, 2002). 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Request for Review at 1. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). Funding Commitment Decision Letter at 2. Id. See Request for Review by Anderson School Staatsburg, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Changes to the Board of Directors of the National Exchange Carrier Association, File No. SLD-133664, CC Docket Nos. 96-45 and 97-21,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-397A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-397A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-397A1.txt
  • 17 FCC Rcd 339 (Com. Car. Bur. rel. December 26, 2001), as corrected by Implementation of Interim Filing Procedures for Filings of Requests for Review, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata (Com. Car. Bur. rel. December 28, 2001 and January 4, 2002). 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Request for Review at 1. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). See Request for Review by Anderson School Staatsburg, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Changes to the Board of Directors of the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., File No. SLD-133664, CC Docket Nos. 96-45 and 97-21, Order, 15 FCC Rcd 25610 (Com.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-398A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-398A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-398A1.txt
  • and other representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Thus, Immaculate Heart fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed on September 17, 2002, by Immaculate Heart of Mary-St. Casimir School, Lansing, Michigan, as well as the request to waive the deadline for filing its appeal are DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-399A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-399A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-399A1.txt
  • other representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD decisions on its behalf. Thus, St. Joseph fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed on October 28, 2002, by St. Joseph University Heights, Buffalo, New York, as well as the request to waive the deadline for filing its appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-39A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-39A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-39A1.txt
  • and such deviation would better serve the public interest than strict adherence to the general rule. Petitioner has not submitted adequate proof that the facts relating to its application present special circumstances warranting a waiver of program rules. Therefore, we affirm SLD and deny the Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by The Bridge Academy, Bridgeport, Connecticut on September 13, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Timothy Dutton, The Bridge Academy, Bridgeport, Connecticut, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-400A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-400A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-400A1.txt
  • behalf, even when such persons are away from the office on medical leave or otherwise incapacitated. Thus, St. Lucy School fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal with SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed on October 30, 2002, by St. Lucy School, Newark, New Jersey, as well as the request to waive the deadline for filing its appeal with SLD ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4029A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4029A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4029A1.txt
  • call that must be handled; (2) emergency call handling; (3) speed of answer; (4) equal access to interexchange carriers; and (5) pay-per-call services. Accordingly, these waivers will expire on June 30, 2004, or upon the release of a further order addressing these waivers, whichever comes first. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in Sections 0.141, 0.361, 1.3 of the Commission Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, 1.3, this Order is ADOPTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Dane Snowden Chief, Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau Formerly, the Common Carrier Bureau. Telecommunications Relay Services and Speech-to-Speech Services for Individuals with Hearing and Speech Disabilities, Order, CC Docket 98-67, DA 01-3029, 17 FCC Rcd 157 (Dec. 31, 2001) (TRS Waiver Order).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-402A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-402A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-402A1.txt
  • representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Here, Stanfield Elementary fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on March 22, 2002, by Stanfield Elementary School District No. 24, Stanfield, Arizona, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4031A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4031A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4031A1.txt
  • affirmed by the Commission. Petitioners agree to the terms of the AirCell Orders, including operation of the AirCell mobile units on a secondary basis, and assert that the legal basis, unique circumstances, and public interest benefits are identical to those that supported and justified the AirCell Orders and the AirCell Waiver Orders. Accordingly, the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, pursuant to sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, grants the requests of AirCell, Inc., Plateau Communications, Inc., and Cable & Communications Corporation dba as Mid-Rivers Cellular for waiver of section 22.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 22.925, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the AirCell Orders and the AirCell Waiver Orders and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4041A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4041A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4041A1.txt
  • section 254 of the Communications Act to grant the waiver request and thus provide federal high-cost support to which PRTC may be entitled to for the entire calendar year of 2004. III. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1-4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 U.S.C. � 1.3, that the Petition for waiver of section 54.313(d)(3)(i) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.313(d)(3)(i), filed by the Puerto Rico Telephone Company on December 8, 2003, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Eric Einhorn Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Federal-State Joint Board on Universal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4056A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4056A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4056A1.txt
  • that the requested waiver be granted. This Order therefore grants Geemarc's waiver request. As a result, Geemarc may proceed with either TCB certification or Self-Declaration of Conformity pursuant to Part 68 of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.141 and 0.361 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the request for waiver of section 68.317(f) filed by Geemarc Telecom International, Ltd, IS GRANTED to the extent stated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: (1) the volume reset override switch shall be labeled as such and located on the telephone
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-406A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-406A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-406A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4082A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4082A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4082A1.txt
  • be frustrated, or that the grant would be in the public interest. Alternatively, an applicant's request for waiver may also be granted if in view of the unique or unusual factual circumstances of the instant case, application of the rules would be inequitable, unduly burdensome or contrary to the public interest or the applicant has no reasonable alternative. Additionally, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules provides authority for a rule waiver upon a showing of good cause. Licensees do not explain how their inability to continue operations at their prior site, operate a profitable system, and effectively upgrade their 220 MHz system meets the Commission's waiver standard. First, the Licensees' business decisions and dealings led to the loss of their site
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4092A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4092A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4092A1.txt
  • public interest will be served by affording KIS sufficient time to construct a formal complaint that complies with the Commission's rigorous rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.720-1.736, should such a complaint be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the requests for extension ARE GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j),
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-40A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-40A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-40A1.txt
  • a deviation from the general rule, and such deviation would better serve the public interest than strict adherence to the general rule. Petitioner's excuse of employee inexperience is not a special circumstance warranting a waiver of program rules. Therefore, we affirm SLD and deny the Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Harris County School District, Hamilton Georgia on July 30, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Susan Andrews, Harris County Board of Education, Hamilton Georgia, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4110A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4110A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4110A1.txt
  • report on or before February 20, 2004. This report shall be addressed to: Suzanne Perrin Room CY-B526 Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau Federal Communication Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 This order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Radhika V. Karmarkar Deputy Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 1.718. See Letter from Warren Firschein, Attorney, Market Disputes Resolution Division, Enforcement Bureau, FCC,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4115A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4115A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4115A1.txt
  • Rcd at 23992, para. 223. See also Market Entry and Regulation of Foreign - Affiliated Entities, IB Docket No. 95-22, Report and Order, FCC 95-475, 11 FCC Rcd 3873, 3902-05, paras. 78-85 (1995). Id. at 23992, para. 223. The Applicants have not shown any special circumstances warranting waiver of the Commission's affiliation or dominant carrier rules. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (2003). See also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. F.C.C., 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (1990); WAIT Radio v. F.C.C., 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (1969). See Note 2 to 47 C.F.R. � 63.09 (2003). According to the Applicants, Telecom Italia S.p.A. holds an indirect 50 percent interest in Nortel Inversora, which in turn holds a 54.7 percent interest in Telecom Argentina. Applicants'
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-420A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-420A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-420A1.txt
  • by the Bureau and subsequently affirmed by the Commission. Petitioners agree to the terms of the AirCell Orders, including operation of the AirCell mobile units on a secondary basis, and assert that the legal basis, unique circumstances, and public interest benefits are identical to those that supported and justified the AirCell Orders. Accordingly, the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, pursuant to sections 1.3 and 22.119(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 22.119(a), grants the requests of AirCell, Inc. and CC Communications for waiver of section 22.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 22.925, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the AirCell Orders and as those terms and conditions may be subsequently modified or amended. This action is
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-42A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-42A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-42A1.txt
  • warrant a deviation from the general rule, and such deviation would better serve the public interest than strict adherence to the general rule. Santa Ana has not presented any special circumstances warranting a waiver of the filing window. Therefore, we affirm SLD and deny the Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Santa Ana Unified School District, Santa Ana, California on July 10, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Karen Aeppli, Santa Ana Unified School District, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-443A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-443A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-443A1.txt
  • not warrant an extension of time to complete construction. 47 C.F.R. � 1.946(e)(2)-(3). See Amendment of the Commission's Rules to Establish New Personal Communications Services, GEN Docket No. 90-314, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 9 FCC Rcd 4957, 5019 (1994) (PCS MO&O), citing WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969). 47 C.F.R. � 1.925. Alternatively, pursuant to section 1.3, the Commission has authority to waive its rules if there is ``good cause'' to do so. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990). Hastings Request at 7; North Platte Request at 6. Hastings Request at 4-5; North Platte Request at 4-5. Hastings Request at 4; North Platte Request at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-449A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-449A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-449A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that Qwest Corporation's request for waiver of Rule 1.718 and for extension of time IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-461A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-461A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-461A1.txt
  • of Michigan, Public Notice, DA 97-127 (Jan. 17, 1997); Revised Procedures for Bell Operating Company Applications Under Section 271 of the Communications Act, Public Notice, 13 FCC Rcd 17457 (Sept. 19, 1997); Updated Filing Requirements for Bell Operating Company Applications Under Section 271 of the Communications Act, Public Notice, DA-99-1994 (Sept. 28, 1999) (collectively ``271 Procedural Public Notices''). See section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Ameritech Michigan Order at 20575, para 57; Application of Bell Atlantic New York for Authorization Under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-Region, InterLATA Service in the State of New York, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 3953, 3968, para. 34 (1999). See 271 Procedural Public Notices. PUBLIC NOTICE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-478A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-478A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-478A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of MCI WORLDCOM Network Services, Inc. Requesting Waiver of Section 1.718 of the Commission's Rules and Further Extension of Time In Which to Convert Its Informal Complaint
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-567A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-567A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-567A1.txt
  • a resubmission period to make minor corrections. During each filing period, submitted applications may be updated and amended multiple times until the filing deadline. Software Requirements Applicants will need to meet the following minimum software requirements: Web Browser, either of the following: Microsoft(R) Internet Explorer 4.0 or higher (recommended). Your browser must have either Microsoft VM or Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1 installed. (available at http://www.adobe.com) If you wish to use the download feature on the Search Results page, you will need a .tar file extraction utility, e.g., Winzip (available at http://www.winzip.com) or Pkzip for Windows (available at http://www.pkware.com/shareware). Submitting FCC Form 175 Applications You can submit FCC Form 175 applications electronically via the Internet. Start your web browser and point it
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-568A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-568A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-568A1.txt
  • to locate its station at a distance within 88 kilometers (55 miles) of an existing co-channel station. Finally, Section 90.621(b)(5) permits separation between co-channel systems to be less than 113 kilometers (70 miles) if the applicant obtains consent from any affected incumbent co-channel licensee indicating that the incumbent licensee will accept any interference resulting from the short-spacing. Pursuant to Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, High Tech seeks waiver of several rule sections pertaining to EA and site-specific license operations on Channel Block A in the 800 MHz SMR bands. Section 1.3 permits waiver of Commission rules for good cause shown. Under Section 1.925, the Commission may grant a waiver request if it is shown that: (1) the underlying
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-569A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-569A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-569A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Fourth Consent Motion of Complainant For Extension of Time In Which To Convert Informal Complaint To Formal Complaint and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-607A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-607A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-607A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-60A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-60A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-60A1.txt
  • the table above, until December 15, 2004. All the other conditions placed on SDI's license shall remain in force, including the condition "Based on non-conformance with the U.S. Table of Frequency Allocations, the operations will be on an unprotected, non-harmful interference basis to all present and future U.S. Government stations." IV. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that SpaceData International, LLC IS GRANTED a waiver of condition (g), imposed in its license in paragraph 26 of Application of SpaceData International LLC For Authority to Operate on a Time-Share Basis NASA's Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System, Order and Authorization, 16 FCC Rcd 9266, 9274 (para. 26) (Int'l Bur., 2001)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-614A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-614A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-614A1.txt
  • assist the Commission in determining, among other things, whether the Administrator is properly administering the universal service support mechanism to prevent fraud, waste, and abuse. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 254 and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, the waiver request filed by the Universal Service Administrative Company on January 8, 2003, is GRANTED to allow submission of the draft audit report for the year 2002 on or before April 15, 2003. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-631A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-631A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-631A1.txt
  • A. Dupont, (202) 418-7072. G. MM Docket No. 01-228; RM-10256 Action: At the request of Jeraldine Anderson, we are allotting Channel 284A at Junction, Texas, as the community's fourth local FM transmission service. Coordinates: The reference coordinates for Channel 284A at Junction are 30-28-19 NL and 99-45-47 West Longitude. Additional Information: This allotment requires a site restriction of 2.1 km (1.3 miles) southeast of Junction at the coordinates indicated above. FCC Contact: Deborah A. Dupont, (202) 418-7072. H. MM Docket No. 01-233; RM-10261 Action: At the request of Charles Crawford, we are allotting Channel 290A at Alton, Missouri, as the community's first local aural transmission service. Coordinates: The reference coordinates for Channel 290A at Alton are 36-44-39 NL and 91-24-28 West
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-634A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-634A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-634A1.txt
  • Permitted List Petition, but we treat it as a request for waiver of the Commission's full-frequency reuse requirements. In its request, Hispasat states that the majority of the power of the Hispasat 1-B satellite is used to provide European coverage, thus leaving insufficient power to employ full-frequency reuse in Hispasat 1-B's coverage of the United States. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (2001). See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (WAIT Radio); Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. See also Comsat Corporation, Petition for Partial Relief from the Current Regulatory Treatment of Comsat World Systems' Switched Voice, Private Line, and Video and Audio
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-640A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-640A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-640A1.txt
  • not warrant an extension of time to complete construction. 47 C.F.R. � 1.946(e)(2)-(3). See Amendment of the Commission's Rules to Establish New Personal Communications Services, GEN Docket No. 90-314, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 9 FCC Rcd 4957, 5019 (1994) (``PCS MO&O''), citing WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969). 47 C.F.R. � 1.925. Alternatively, pursuant to section 1.3, the Commission has authority to waive its rules if there is ``good cause'' to do so. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990). Extension Request at 3-8. Id. at 4-8. Id. at 4-5. Id. Id. at 2, 5. Id. at 5. Id. Id. at 6. Id. at 7. Id.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-67A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-67A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-67A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that Qwest Corporation's Request for waiver of Rule 1.718 and for Extension of Time IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-756A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-756A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-756A1.txt
  • better serve the public interest than strict adherence to the general rule. An applicant's failure to submit all the required Blocks of the FCC Form 471 does not create special circumstances warranting a waiver of the filing window. Therefore, we affirm SLD and deny the Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Center for Russian Jewry, on behalf of Be'er Hagolah Institute, Brooklyn, New York, on July 16, 2002, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Pearl Kaufman, The
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-757A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-757A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-757A1.txt
  • and through its toll-free number. In addition, lack of Internet access does not provide grounds for relief because information is alternately available through a toll-free telephone number. Finally, continued financial need does not meet the requirement of special circumstances that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. 4. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Hasbrouck Heights School District, Hasbrouck Heights, New Jersey, on February 19, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Joseph Bellino, Hasbrouck Heights School District, to the Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-758A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-758A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-758A1.txt
  • Finally, New Carlisle Olive's argument that SLD took approximately 10 weeks to notify the library that it had missed the deadline is irrelevant to the waiver analysis. Therefore, we conclude that New Carlisle Olive has failed to demonstrated special circumstances upon which its Waiver Request can be granted. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by New Carlisle Olive, New Carlisle, Indiana, on April 12, 2002, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Electronic mail from Stephen Boggs, New Carlisle Olive Township Public Library, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-75A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-75A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-75A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-767A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-767A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-767A1.txt
  • this proceeding require that any additional pleadings, other than those described herein, must be served and filed prior to the initial status conference. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. �� 1.726 (replies), 1.729 (discovery). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), 208, and 255 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 208, 255, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Unopposed Motion of Defendants to Modify Procedural Schedule IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Colleen K. Heitkamp Chief, Telecommunications Consumers Division Enforcement Bureau See O'Day v. Audiovox Communications Corporation and Verizon Wireless, Notice
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-76A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-76A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-76A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-77A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-77A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-77A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-787A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-787A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-787A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of MCI WORLDCOM Network Services, Inc. Requesting Waiver of Section 1.718 of the Commission's Rules and Further Extension of Time In Which to Convert Its Informal Complaint
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-78A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-78A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-78A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-798A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-798A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-798A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit � DA 03-798 March 17, 2003 WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU SEEKS COMMENT ON AN ASSIGNMENT OF AND A REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO CONSTRUCT A 220 MHz NATIONWIDE COMMERCIAL LICENSE Petitions/Comments Due: April 17, 2003 Oppositions Due: April 28, 2003 Replies Due: May 5, 2003 Pursuant to sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (``Bureau'') seeks comment on an application filed by Rush Network Corp. (``Rush Network'') and the Association of American Railroads (``AAR'') to assign the 220-222 MHz (``220 MHz'') nationwide, commercial Phase I license, call sign WPWY753 (``License'') from Rush Network to AAR. The Bureau also seeks comment on a related request
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-827A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-827A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-827A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Fifth Consent Motion of Complainant For Extension of Time In Which To Convert Informal Complaint To Formal Complaint and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-836A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-836A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-836A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of MCI WORLDCOM Network Services, Inc. Requesting Waiver of Section 1.718 of the Commission's Rules and Further Extension of Time In Which to Convert Its Informal Complaint
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-844A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-844A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-844A1.txt
  • adherence to the general rule. We therefore grant a waiver of the October 28, 2001 deadline to the Applicants, and remand to SLD for further processing of their corrected FCC Forms 486. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1-4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 U.S.C. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) that the Waiver Request filed by Eastern Lebanon County School District, Myerstown, Pennsylvania, on February 20, 2002 IS GRANTED, and these applications are REMANDED to SLD for further action consistent with this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Waiver Request filed by Newport News Public
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-849A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-849A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-849A1.txt
  • conclusion Consistent with the foregoing, we grant BellSouth's amendment in part, permitting it to remove DataReach, ISDN Single Number Routing Option, and UNI-Serve from its ONA plan. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i) and (j), 201, 202, 203, 205, 214, and 218 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 63.71 of the Commission's rules, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 154(j), 201, 202, 203, 205, 214, 218, and 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91 0.291, 1.3, 63.71, BellSouth's Open Network Architecture Plan amendment IS GRANTED in part. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William F. Maher, Jr. Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Filing and Review of Open Network Architecture Plans, BellSouth Open Network Architecture Plan
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-852A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-852A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-852A1.txt
  • the basis of incorrect advice from SLD. Commission precedent establishes that where a party has received erroneous advice, the government is not estopped from enforcing its rules in a manner that is inconsistent with the advice provided by the employee, particularly where relief is contrary to a rule. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Alabama Institute for the Deaf and Blind, Talladega, Alabama on January 13, 2003, IS DISMISSED and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-855A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-855A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-855A1.txt
  • the basis of incorrect advice from SLD. Commission precedent establishes that where a party has received erroneous advice, the government is not estopped from enforcing its rules in a manner that is inconsistent with the advice provided by the employee, particularly where relief is contrary to a rule. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Ventnor Educational Community Complex, Ventnor City, New Jersey on January 30, 2003, IS DISMISSED and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-860A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-860A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-860A1.txt
  • Conditional Petition of Western Wireless for Waiver of Number Pooling Obligations in McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, Texas, CC Docket Nos. 99-200 and 95-116 (filed Nov. 27, 2002) (Western Wireless Petition); Supplement to Petition for Waiver and Petition for Clarification of Western Wireless Corporation, CC Docket Nos. 99-200, 96-98, and 95-116 (filed March 3, 2003) (Western Wireless Supplemental Petition); see also 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 52.20(b). See 47 C.F.R. 52.20(b). Thousands block number pooling is a process by which the 10,000 numbers in a central office code (NXX) are separated into ten sequential blocks of 1,000 numbers each (thousands-blocks), and allocated separately within a rate center. See 47 C.F.R. � 52.20(a); see also Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 7347
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-861A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-861A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-861A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-875A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-875A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-875A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-97A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-97A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-97A1.txt
  • Lansing, the November 1999/February 2000 reported results for WOOD-TV both total viewing hours and net weekly circulation equal zero; for November 2000/February 2001 the reported results, with one standard error added, are 2.87 percent of total viewing hours and a net weekly circulation of 11.59 percent. For East Lansing, the November 1999/February 2000 results, with one standard error added, are 1.3 percent share of total viewing hours and a net weekly circulation of 17.99 percent; for November 2000/February 2001 the shares are 1.34 percent of total viewing hours and a net weekly circulation of 19.21 percent. For both years, the share of total weekly viewing hours and the net weekly circulation both fall below the required 3 percent and 25 percent
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1043A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1043A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1043A1.txt
  • the public interest by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 4. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section 1.718 of our
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1049A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1049A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1049A1.txt
  • replies electronically are reminded they are still required to serve copies in accordance with these rules as stated herein. III. ORDERING CLAUSE 16. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4 (i) and (j), 201-209, of the Communications Act, as amended, this order is HEREBY ADOPTED as described above. 17. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commissions rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, section 61.49(k) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 61.49(k), IS WAIVED for the purpose specified in paragraph 8 supra. 18. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, section 1.4(f) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.4(f), IS WAIVED for the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1062A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1062A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1062A1.txt
  • grant Verizon an extension of the limited waiver of section 61.42(g) for services transferred from VADI to Verizon only for purposes of the 2004 Annual Access Tariff Filing. ordering clauses IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 204(a), and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, section 61.42(g) of the Commission's rules IS WAIVED for services transferred from VADI to Verizon, only with respect to Verizon's 2004 Annual Access Tariff Filing requirements under section 61.43 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 61.42(g), 61.43. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Deena M. Shetler Deputy Chief, Pricing Policy Division
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1075A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1075A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1075A1.txt
  • it is considered to be in default on its installment payment obligations, and its license automatically cancels. Accordingly, in order to avoid automatic cancellation of the Duluth and St. Joseph licenses, payments that were due for those licenses on October 31, 2003, together with all associated late fees, must be paid on or before April 30, 2004. Pursuant to Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, TriCo seeks relief from the April 30, 2004, final deadline. TriCo has applied to the Rural Utilities Service (RUS) of the United States Department of Agriculture for a loan and asserts that it needs the loan in order to meet its installment payment obligations and continue operating. III. DISCUSSION We deny TriCo's Request. Section
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1081A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1081A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1081A1.txt
  • service, without any disruption. While we do not favor ONA amendments that remove previously-approved services, we conclude that the facts of this case warrant granting Qwest's petition. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i) and (j), 201, 202, 203, 205, 214, and 218 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 63.71 of the Commission's rules, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 154(j), 201, 202, 203, 205, 214, 218, and 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91 0.291, 1.3, 63.71, Qwest's petition for permission to withdraw ONA services Dataphone Select-a-Station, DDS2-Wire, and ScanAlert, IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William F. Maher, Jr. Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Qwest Corporation Petition for Permission to Withdraw ONA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1099A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1099A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1099A1.txt
  • report on or before June 18, 2004. This report shall be addressed to: Suzanne Perrin Room CY-B526 Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau Federal Communication Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 This order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Radhika V. Karmarkar Deputy Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 1.718. See Judware v. Verizon, Order, DA 04-577, 2004 WL 369089 (F.C.C.) (February 27,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1101A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1101A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1101A1.txt
  • at least 100% of the time the station airs an analog signal). Stations, both commercial and NCE, that have been granted an extension of time to construct their DTV facilities must comply with the minimum digital operation requirements in effect at the time the station commences digital operations. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the Request for Waiver of Simulcasting Requirement filed by South Texas Public Broadcasting System, Inc. IS GRANTED to the extent described herein. This action is taken pursuant to authority delegated by Sections 0.61(h) and 0.283 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.61(h), 0.283. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION W. Kenneth Ferree Chief, Media
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1128A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1128A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1128A1.txt
  • in a manner that is inconsistent with the advice provided by the employee, particularly where relief is contrary to a rule. In keeping with our prior decisions, we determine that Four County and North Penn have not demonstrated the special circumstances necessary for a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on March 26, 2003, by Four County Library System, Vestal, New York, IS DISMISSED, and the Requests for Review filed on March 22, 2004, by Gloucester City Library, Gloucester City, New Jersey and on May 13, 2003, by North Penn
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-112A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-112A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-112A1.txt
  • responsible for submitting their appeals in a timely manner and complying with program rules and procedures. In this instance, NAFI failed to comply with the deadline. This failure based on NAFI misunderstanding of the timing deadline does not constitute special circumstance to justify a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed on April 21, 2003, by North American Family Institute, Danvers, Massachusetts, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Daniel Nakamoto, North American Family Institute, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-113A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-113A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-113A1.txt
  • responsible for submitting their appeals in a timely manner and complying with program rules and procedures. In this instance, Alachua failed to comply with the deadline. This failure based on Alachua misunderstanding of the program rules does not constitute special circumstance to justify a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed on June 24, 2003, by School Board of Alachua County, Gainesville, Florida, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1145A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1145A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1145A1.txt
  • its application that it intends to operate DIRECTV 7S as a direct broadcast satellite, on a non-broadcast, non-common carrier basis. Therefore, in accordance with Section 25.121(a) of the Commission's rules, the license term for DIRECTV 7S will be 10 years. ORDERING CLAUSES ations, and technical specifications set forth in its application, as amended. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that DIRECTV Enterprises, LLC is granted a waiver of Section 25.202(g) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 25.202(g), conditioned as set forth in this Order above to use the 14002-14004 MHz and 14496-14498 MHz bands for telecommand operations during transfer orbit for no longer than a 15-day period from the time
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1167A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1167A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1167A1.txt
  • apply, there is no basis to ignore the Commission's explicit findings. Nor is there a public interest justification for a waiver in favor of a single applicant. Northrop Grumman states if there are policy justifications for altering the rules, it should be done in a rulemaking proceeding where opportunities created by the changes are available to all interested parties. Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules authorizes the Commission to waive its rules for "good cause shown." Waiver is appropriate only if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, and such deviation would better serve the public interest than would strict adherence to the general rule. Generally, the Commission may grant a waiver of its rules in a particular case
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1236A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1236A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1236A1.txt
  • a population of 263 people. El Indio has its own post office and zip code, community center, several churches and a number of local businesses serving the residents of the community. A staff engineering analysis indicates that Channel 236A can be allotted to El Indio consistent with the minimum distance separation requirements of the Commission's Rules with a site restriction 1.3 kilometers (0.8 miles) southeast of the community at coordinates 28-30-22 NL and 100-18-03 WL. Since El Indio is located within 320 kilometers of the U.S-Mexican border, concurrence of the Mexican Government will be requested for the allotment of Channel 236A at El Indio. 3. In view of the fact that the proposed allotment could provide a first local FM broadcast
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1252A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1252A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1252A1.txt
  • the Commission's rules to shorten the recovery period of the LNP charge from 60 to 47 months in service areas where the monthly LNP end-user charge of 41 cents is currently in effect. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 201, 202, and 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 201, 202, 251(e), section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, the five-year recovery rule set forth in section 52.33(a)(1)(iv) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 52.33(a)(1)(iv), IS WAIVED to allow Citizens to shorten the recovery period of its monthly LNP end-user charge
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1253A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1253A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1253A1.txt
  • strict compliance with the rule would be inconsistent with the public interest. In keeping with our prior decisions, we determine that the applicants here have not demonstrated the special circumstances necessary for a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the referenced Requests for Review filed by Bedford Area School District, Bedford, Pennsylvania, on May 12, 2003; Glenwood Community School District, Glenwood, Iowa, on May 22, 2003; Hunterdon Central Regional High School, Flemington, New Jersey, on May 12, 2003; Immaculate Conception School, Everett, Washington, on May 6, 2003; Libraries Online Inc., Middletown, Connecticut, on June 18, 2003;
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1261A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1261A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1261A1.txt
  • Qwest's provision of customer notification and certification to the Commission that complies with all requirements of section 64.1120(e), except the 30-day periods waived herein. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.141, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Qwest Corporation, on April 28, 2004, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Nancy Stevenson, Deputy Chief Consumer Policy Division Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau See 2000 Biennial Review-Review of Policies
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1287A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1287A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1287A1.txt
  • alleging that they do not have prior experience with the line-count filing procedures. We therefore deny FiberNet's request for waiver of section 54.307(c)(3). ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.307(c)(3) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.307(c) filed by FiberNet, LLC on February 12, 2002, IS DENIED, as described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Eric N. Einhorn Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau FiberNet, LLC, Petition for Waiver of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1291A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1291A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1291A1.txt
  • No. 99-200, 17 FCC Rcd 252, 307 (2001) (Numbering Resource Optimization Third Report and Order). . Advantage Petition at 1, Plateau Petition at 1. See Advantage Petition at 4-5; Corr Petition at 3-5; Plateau Petition at 4-5. Advantage Petition at 4-8; Plateau Petition at 4-8. Advantage Petition at 1; Corr Petition at 1-2; Plateau Petition at 1. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972) (WAIT Radio). Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (Northeast Cellular). WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1159; Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1157. Id. at 1159. Western Wireless Order, 18 FCC Rcd
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1312A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1312A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1312A1.txt
  • ensure that customers' requests for services will not be delayed due to carriers' difficulty in obtaining numbering resources. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1, 4(i), 251, and 332 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 251, 332, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 52.9(b), and 52.23(e) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 52.9(b), 52.23(e), the petition filed by The North-Eastern Pennsylvania Telephone Company is DENIED to the extent described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau See Petition of The North-Eastern Pennsylvania Telephone Company Petition for Waiver of Section 52.23(b) of the Commission's Rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1382A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1382A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1382A1.txt
  • in the public interest. We therefore grant NOW's LNP Waiver Petition, and extend the deadline for full LNP compliance to November 30, 2004. Ordering Clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority granted in Sections 4(i), 251, and 332 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 251 and 332, and sections 0.131, 0.331, and 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 0.331, 1.3, that the Request of NOW Licenses, LLC for Temporary Partial Waiver of Section 52.31 of the Commission's Rules Pertaining to the Porting In of Numbers is GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey S. Steinberg Deputy Chief, Spectrum and Competition Policy Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau In the Matter of Telephone Number Portability,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1393A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1393A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1393A1.txt
  • warrant a waiver of section 54.301(b) of the Commission's rules. This waiver will allow Smithville to receive LSS for the 2004 calendar year. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.301(b) of the Commission's rules, filed by Smithville Telephone Company, Inc., on February 26, 2004, IS GRANTED, as described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Eric N. Einhorn Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Smithville Telephone Company, Inc., Petition for Waiver of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1396A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1396A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1396A1.txt
  • Mistaken information from an SLD employee does not absolve an applicant from following the program requirements. The mere assertion that a letter was not received is insufficient grounds for reconsideration. Consistent with existing precedent as described above, the Telecommunications Access Policy Division denies the above-captioned Requests for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the requests filed by Austin Independent School District, Austin, Texas, on November 19, 2002; Avon Local Board of Education, Avon, Ohio, on November 6, 2002; Navajo Evangelical Lutheran Mission, Rock Point, Arizona, on June 13, 2003; and Vermont Academy, Saxtons River, Vermont, on October 15,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1398A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1398A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1398A1.txt
  • fails to meet the October 28, 2001 deadline for Funding Year 2001 discounts could obtain discounts for services received on or after the date that its FCC Form 486 was postmarked. Consistent with our precedent in Craig County, we affirm SLD's decision and deny LPSD's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the request filed by Lake and Peninsula School District, King Salmon, Alaska, on September 16, 2002 is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Dennis Niedermeyer, Lake and Peninsula School District, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1421A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1421A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1421A1.txt
  • state certification in time for ALLTEL to receive support for all four quarters of 2004. ALLTEL further explains that the Nebraska PSC concluded a proceeding in March 2004 and found that ALLTEL properly demonstrated that it would use the federal high cost universal service support for appropriate purposes. For these reasons, ALLTEL requests that the Commission grant, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, a waiver of section 54.313 to treat the Nebraska PSC state certification as timely filed in order for ALLTEL to obtain support for all of 2004. We invite comment on the Petition for Waiver. Pursuant to applicable procedures set forth in sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments on or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1422A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1422A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1422A1.txt
  • certification in time for Qwest to receive support for all four quarters of 2004. Qwest further explains that the Nebraska PSC concluded a proceeding on March 16, 2004 and found that Qwest properly demonstrated that it would use the federal high cost universal service support for appropriate purposes. For these reasons, Qwest requests that the Commission grant, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, a waiver of section 54.313 to treat the Nebraska PSC state certification as timely filed in order for Qwest to obtain support for all of 2004. We invite comment on the Petition for Waiver. Pursuant to applicable procedures set forth in sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments on or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-142A5.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-142A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-142A5.txt
  • may access the FCC Automated Auction System via the FCC Wide Area Network. Minimum Hardware and Software Requirements The following hardware and software, at a minimum, are required to use the FCC Bidding System: CPU: Pentium 133 or above RAM: 32 MB (64 MB recommended) Monitor: VGA or above Mouse or other pointing device "! higher, with Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1_08. Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1_08 is available for downloading at http://java.sun.com/products/archive/index.html In addition, users accessing the FCC Auctions Bidding System via the FCC's Wide Area Network will need: Modem: 28.8 Kbps Hayes(c) compatible modem or faster (56 Kbps recommended) Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) Dialer: Use the Dial-Up Networking feature included with the operating system Connecting to the FCC Wide Area Network To
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1450A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1450A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1450A1.txt
  • informal complaints into formal complaints. Because this extension will facilitate the possible settlement of these numerous claims, particularly in light of the Court's recent opinion, we are satisfied that our action today serves the public interest. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 208, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and the authority delegated by sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111 and 0.311, that section 1.718(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.718(a), IS HEREBY WAIVED, with regard to the IPP EUCL informal complaints described herein and the deadline for the conversion and filing of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1455A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1455A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1455A1.txt
  • of time until July 1, 2004. See Letter from Sylvia Lesse, Kraskin, Moorman, and Cosson, LLC to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, filed May 7, 2004 (Choice Wireless May 7th ex parte). Verizon Wireless Comments (Verizon Wireless Comments), Dobson Communications Corporation Comments (Dobson Comments), and Nextel Communications Comments (Nextel Comments). National Telecommunications Cooperative Association Comments at 1. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972) (WAIT Radio). Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (Northeast Cellular). WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1159; Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1157. Id. at 1159. 47 C.F.R. � 52.23(e); see also
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-14A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-14A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-14A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1503A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1503A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1503A1.txt
  • may have a detrimental impact on an applicant does not create special circumstances or particular facts that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. In keeping with our prior decisions, we determine that the Petitioners have not demonstrated the special circumstances necessary for a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the requests filed by Lucia Mar Unified School District, Arroyo Grande, California, on May 24, 2002; Ontario Local Schools, Mansfield, Ohio, on October 9, 2002; School Administrative District 04, Guilford, Maine, on December 19, 2002; and Traverse City Area Public Schools, Traverse City, Michigan, on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1513A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1513A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1513A1.txt
  • the FCC Form 175, will assist the Commission in monitoring the participation of these ``designated entities'' in its auctions. Exhibit F - Miscellaneous Information: Applicants wishing to submit additional information should also include it in Exhibit F. Waivers: Applicants requesting waiver of any rules must submit a statement of reasons sufficient to justify the waiver sought. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925. Certifications: Applicants should carefully read the list of certifications on the FCC Form 175. These certifications help to ensure a fair and competitive auction and require, among other things, disclosure to the Commission of certain information on applicant ownership and agreements or arrangements concerning the auction. Submission of an FCC Form 175 application constitutes a representation by the certifying
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1581A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1581A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1581A1.txt
  • Rules and Policies, First Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, IB Docket No. 02-34, 18 FCC Rcd 10760, 10852 (para. 244) (2003) (First Space Station Reform Order). First Space Station Reform Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 10852 (para. 244). 47. C.F.R. � 25.114 (c)(7). SES Americom Amendment at 2. Id. SES Modification at 5. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972) (WAIT Radio). Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (Northeast Cellular). WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1159; Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1157. Id. at 1159. See File No. SAT-STA-20000906-00130; see also
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1639A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1639A4.txt
  • 56 24.5 N 119 15 22.0 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 2 45 56 0.2 N 119 19 17.5 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 2 45 55 18.7 N 119 21 48.0 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 2 45 55 7 N 119 25 51.1 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 2 45 47 45.7 N 119 26 2.6 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 2 45 36 11.1 N 119 26 1.3 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 2 45 36 7.7 N 119 14 50.1 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 2 45 30 58.9 N 119 14 50.1 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 2 45 30 58.2 N 119 8 39.1 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 2 45 4 59.3 N 119 8 43.5 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 2 45 4 59.3 N 119 9 43.8 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 2 44
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1639A4_Erratum.pdf
  • 56 24.5 N 119 15 22.0 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 2 45 56 0.2 N 119 19 17.5 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 2 45 55 18.7 N 119 21 48.0 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 2 45 55 7 N 119 25 51.1 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 2 45 47 45.7 N 119 26 2.6 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 2 45 36 11.1 N 119 26 1.3 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 2 45 36 7.7 N 119 14 50.1 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 2 45 30 58.9 N 119 14 50.1 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 2 45 30 58.2 N 119 8 39.1 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 2 45 4 59.3 N 119 8 43.5 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 2 45 4 59.3 N 119 9 43.8 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 2 44
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1684A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1684A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1684A1.txt
  • Services Number Portability Obligation, WT Docket No. 01-184 and CC Docket No. 95-116, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 17 FCC Rcd at 14972, 14986 (2002 Forbearance Order). See Leaco Petition at 2; CPK Petition at 1; Litchfield Petition at 1; North Carolina RSA 1 Petition at 1; Duluth Petition at 1; and Ramcell of Oregon Petition at 1. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972) (WAIT Radio). Telephone Number Portability, CC Docket No. 95-116, First Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 11 FCC Rcd 8352 (1996). See 2002 Forbearance Order, 17 FCC Rcd at 14982. Id. at 14986. Federal Communications Commission DA 04-1684
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1688A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1688A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1688A1.txt
  • rules. This waiver will allow Midwest to begin receiving high-cost support as of July 12, 2002, the date Midwest received its ETC designation. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.314(d)(3) of the Commission's rules, filed by Midwest Iowa Wireless, L.L.C., on March 20, 2003, IS GRANTED, as described herein, and that the petition for waiver of section 54.313(d)(3)(iii) of the Commission's rules, filed by Midwest Iowa Wireless, L.L.C., on March 20,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1696A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1696A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1696A1.txt
  • reasons stated above, and given the unique circumstances presented here, we find it reasonable to grant the relief as requested by Dobson. Dobson will have until December 31, 2004 to bring the former NOW PCS system into full compliance with the Commission's TTY rule, 47 CFR � 20.18(c). ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 0.131, 0.331, 1.3, and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 0.331, 1.3, 1.925 the petition filed by Dobson Cellular Systems, Inc. is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Dobson will have until December 31, 2004 to bring the formerly NOW PCS system into full compliance with the Commission's TTY rule, 47 CFR � 20.18(c). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Dobson
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1697A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1697A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1697A1.txt
  • given the special circumstances presented here, we find it reasonable to grant the relief as requested by NOW. NOW is granted an extension for compliance with the Commission's TTY rules until June 30, 2004 or until such time as it consummates the transaction with Dobson, whichever is sooner. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 0.131, 0.331, 1.3, and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 0.331, 1.3, 1.925 the petition filed by NOW Licenses, LLC is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that NOW Licenses, LLC will have until June 30, 2004 or until such time as it consummates the transaction with Dobson, whichever is sooner, to come into compliance with the Commission's TTY rule, 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1698A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1698A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1698A1.txt
  • between the EESS (passive) and the fixed and mobile services in the band 36-37 GHz. However, implementation of any constraints on these terrestrial services would have to be evaluated with respect to the future operations of such services in this band. (April 30, 2004). Radio Conference Subcommittee (RCS) Preparation for ITU Radiocommunication Conferences DRAFT PRELIMINARY VIEW FOR WRC-07 Agenda Item 1.3: in accordance with Resolution 747(WRC-03), consider upgrading the radiolocation service to primary allocation status in the bands 9 000-9 200 MHz and 9 300-9 500 MHz and extending by up to 200 MHz the existing primary allocations to the Earth exploration-satellite service (active) and the space research service (active) in the band 9 500-9 800 MHz without placing undue constraint
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1698A1_Erratum.doc
  • between the EESS (passive) and the fixed and mobile services in the band 36-37 GHz. However, implementation of any constraints on these terrestrial services would have to be evaluated with respect to the future operations of such services in this band. (April 30, 2004). Radio Conference Subcommittee (RCS) Preparation for ITU Radiocommunication Conferences DRAFT PRELIMINARY VIEW FOR WRC-07 Agenda Item 1.3: in accordance with Resolution 747(WRC-03), consider upgrading the radiolocation service to primary allocation status in the bands 9 000-9 200 MHz and 9 300-9 500 MHz and extending by up to 200 MHz the existing primary allocations to the Earth exploration-satellite service (active) and the space research service (active) in the band 9 500-9 800 MHz without placing undue constraint
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1699A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1699A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1699A1.txt
  • a resubmission period to make minor corrections. During each filing period, submitted applications may be updated and amended multiple times until the filing deadline. Software Requirements Applicants will need to meet the following minimum software requirements: Web Browser, either of the following: Microsoft(R) Internet Explorer 4.0 or higher (recommended). Your browser must have either Microsoft VM or Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1_08 installed. PDF Viewer: Adobe Acrobat Reader 5.0 or higher (available at http://www.adobe.com) If you wish to use the download feature on the Search Results page, you will need a .tar file extraction utility, e.g., Winzip (available at http://www.winzip.com) or Pkzip for Windows (available at http://www.pkware.com/shareware). Submitting FCC Form 175 Applications You can submit FCC Form 175 applications electronically via the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1703A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1703A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1703A1.txt
  • with the Cities on or about March 1, 2003, and the Cities ruled on them in December of that year and January 2004. Allen Appeal, Exhibit A (City of Allen, Collin County, Texas, Ordinance No. 2240-12-03), at � 1, � 3 at 1 & at 3; Flower Mound Appeal, Exhibit A (Town of Flower Mound, Texas, Ordinance No. 01-04), at �1.3 at 2 & at 4; McKinney Appeal, Exhibit A (City of McKinney, Texas, Ordinance No. 2003-12-116), at � 1.3 at 1 & at 4. Although neither Comcast nor the Cities cites to the rule, they appear to refer to Form 1240, Module C, available at http://www.fcc.gov/ formpage.html (visited March 30, 2004). Allen Appeal at 16 & n.50, quoting Exhibit G
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1712A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1712A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1712A1.txt
  • compliance with the verification requirements of �� 64.1100-1190, including third party verification, for those affected end-users that ultimately select BellSouth as their service provider. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.141, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, 1.3, the waiver request filed by BellSouth Telecommunications, on June 9, 2004, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Nancy A. Stevenson, Deputy Chief, Policy Division Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau See 2000 Biennial Review-Review of Policies
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1749A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1749A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1749A1.txt
  • public interest, and will postpone the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the request for extension of time to file complainants' formal complaint IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadlines that otherwise would apply under section 1.718 of the Commission's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1809A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1809A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1809A1.txt
  • motion requesting such action within sixty (60) days after notice of termination or expiration of the automatic stay in Cable & Wireless' bankruptcy proceedings, rather than filing an entirely new formal complaint. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3, 1.716-18, and 1.720-1.736 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.716-18, 1.720-36, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that Qwest's and U.S. South's Joint Request for Dismissal With Prejudice as to U.S. South IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1843A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1843A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1843A1.txt
  • that the requested waiver be granted. This Order therefore grants Geemarc's waiver request. As a result, Geemarc may proceed with either TCB certification or Self-Declaration of Conformity pursuant to Part 68 of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.141 and 0.361 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the request for waiver of section 68.317(f) for Models CL300FCC and CS40XLC, filed by Geemarc Telecom International Ltd., IS GRANTED to the extent stated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: (1) the volume reset override switch shall be labeled as such
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1874A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1874A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1874A1.txt
  • report on or before Auguest 20, 2004. This report shall be addressed to: Suzanne Perrin Room CY-B526 Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau Federal Communication Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 This order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Radhika V. Karmarkar Deputy Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 1.718. See Judware v. Verizon, Order, DA 04-1099, 2004 WL 877367 (F.C.C.) (April 26,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1957A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1957A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1957A2.txt
  • X3W �;N :^�"& �Aw�" *``.�i"�{ ��ɲs E 0P� a�'"C �&�...}��0� ...N���� �� E#��]�:��߯� endstream endobj 19 0 obj<> endobj 1 0 obj<> endobj 2 0 obj<> endobj 3 0 obj<> endobj 4 0 obj<>stream xmlns:pdf='http://ns.adobe.com/pdf/1.3/' pdf:Producer='Acrobat Distiller 6.0 (Windows)'> lstover endstream endobj 5 0 obj<> endobj xref 0 6 0000000000 65535 f 0000007935 00000 n 0000007968 00000 n 0000007991 00000 n 0000008041 00000 n 0000011410 00000 n trailer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1957A3.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1957A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1957A3.txt
  • X3W �;N :^�"& �Aw�" *``.�i"�{ ��ɲs E 0P� a�'"C �&�...}��0� ...N���� �� E#��]�:��߯� endstream endobj 19 0 obj<> endobj 1 0 obj<> endobj 2 0 obj<> endobj 3 0 obj<> endobj 4 0 obj<>stream xmlns:pdf='http://ns.adobe.com/pdf/1.3/' pdf:Producer='Acrobat Distiller 6.0 (Windows)'> lstover endstream endobj 5 0 obj<> endobj xref 0 6 0000000000 65535 f 0000008011 00000 n 0000008044 00000 n 0000008067 00000 n 0000008117 00000 n 0000011486 00000 n trailer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1976A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1976A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1976A1.txt
  • at least 100% of the time the station airs an analog signal). Stations, both commercial and NCE, that have been granted an extension of time to construct their DTV facilities must comply with the minimum digital operation requirements in effect at the time the station commences digital operations. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the Request for Waiver of Simulcasting Requirement filed on behalf of Educational Broadcasting Corporation IS GRANTED to the extent described herein. This action is taken pursuant to authority delegated by Sections 0.61(h) and 0.283 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.61(h), 0.283. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION W. Kenneth Ferree Chief, Media Bureau
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2000A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2000A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2000A1.txt
  • public interest, and will postpone the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the request for extension of time to file complainants' formal complaint IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadlines that otherwise would apply under section 1.718 of the Commission's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2076A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2076A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2076A1.txt
  • Commission's rules to allow it to receive high-cost universal service support for the first and second quarters of 2002. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201 and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201 and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.307(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 54.307(c) filed by United States Cellular Corporation on March 20, 2002, IS GRANTED, to the extent described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William F. Maher, Jr. Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Submission of Supplementary Information Pursuant to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2081A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2081A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2081A1.txt
  • C.F.R. �25.114(c)(5). See July 2003 amendments at 34, Revised Table 4.1-1: Requested Frequency Bands. 47 C.F.R. �25.202(g). See, e.g., Amendment of the Commission's Rules with Regard to the 3650 - 3700 MHz Government Transfer Band, ET Docket No. 98-237, First Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 00-363, 15 FCC Rcd 20488, 20538-39, � 129. See Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �1.3. See also Astrolink Int'l LLC, Application for Authority to Construct, Launch and Operate a Ka-band Satellite System in the Fixed-Satellite Service, 16 FCC Rcd 20124, 20129-30 (Int'l Bur., 2001). Amendment of the Commission's Space Station Licensing Rules and Policies, IB Docket No. 02-34, First Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2086A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2086A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2086A1.txt
  • may access the FCC Automated Auction System via the FCC Wide Area Network. Minimum Hardware and Software Requirements The following hardware and software, at a minimum, are required to use the FCC Bidding System: CPU: Pentium 133 or above RAM: 32 MB (64 MB recommended) Monitor: VGA or above Mouse or other pointing device "! higher, with Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1_08. Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1_08 is available for downloading at http://java.sun.com/products/archive/index.html In addition, users accessing the FCC Auctions Bidding System via the FCC's Wide Area Network will need: Modem: 28.8 Kbps Hayes(c) compatible modem or faster (56 Kbps recommended) Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) Dialer: Use the Dial-Up Networking feature included with the operating system Connecting to the FCC Wide Area Network To
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2100A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2100A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2100A1.txt
  • and Order, 16 FCC Rcd 16431 (WTB CWD 2000) (Intek MO& O). In the Intek MO&O, the Division concluded that it would be unduly burdensome to apply the various construction rules to a 220 MHz licensee that held three different types of licenses and planned to build a single nationwide system. Id. 47 C.F.R. � 1.925. Alternatively, pursuant to Section 1.3, the Commission has authority to waive its rules if there is ``good cause'' to do so. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990). 47 C.F.R. � 1.946. Section 1.946(e) also enumerates specific circumstances that would not warrant an extension of time to complete construction. 47 C.F.R. � 1.946(e)(2)-(3). See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2124A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2124A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2124A1.txt
  • discontinued. Appendix 2 also contains the date in which Motient acquired the licenses and the state where the license is located. See Public Interest Statement at 3. 47 C.F.R. � 1.946(e). Section 1.946(e) also states specific circumstances that would not warrant an extension of time to complete construction. 47 C.F.R. � 1.946(e)(2)-(3). 47 C.F.R. � 1.925. Alternatively, pursuant to section 1.3, the Commission has authority to waive its rules if there is ``good cause'' to do so. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990). Public Interest Statement at 2. Motient's service consists of a two-way wireless packet data network provide a range of mobile and internet communication services principally to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2258A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2258A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2258A1.txt
  • 69.605(c). We therefore find that Killduff Telephone's requested waiver of section 69.605(c) of the Commission rules is in the public interest and should be granted. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), and 254 and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the joint petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze as codified in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, by Searsboro Telephone Company, Inc. and Killduff Telephone Company dated October 24, 2003, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), and 5(c) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2335A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2335A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2335A1.txt
  • at least 100% of the time the station airs an analog signal). Stations, both commercial and NCE, that have been granted an extension of time to construct their DTV facilities must comply with the minimum digital operation requirements in effect at the time the station commences digital operations. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the Request for Waiver of Simulcasting Requirement filed on behalf of NBC Universal, Inc. IS GRANTED to the extent described herein. This action is taken pursuant to authority delegated by Sections 0.61(h) and 0.283 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.61(h), 0.283. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION W. Kenneth Ferree Chief, Media Bureau
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2439A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2439A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2439A1.txt
  • or would be frustrated by its application in the particular case, and that grant of the waiver is in the public interest; or (b) the unique facts or unusual circumstances of a particular case render application of the rule inequitable, unduly burdensome, or otherwise contrary to the public interest, or the applicant has no reasonable alternative. Alternatively, pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, the Commission has authority to waive its rules if there is ``good cause'' to do so. While Futronics argues that no provision for a waiver is provided in the Report and Order establishing the defined 50-mile area within which the subject frequencies may be assigned, we agree with Midport that rulemaking proceedings typically do not include
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2449A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2449A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2449A1.txt
  • without requiring them to repoint their antennas). elsat lacks authority to operate a C-band payload at that orbital position. VisionStar Extension Application at 9, citing EarthWatch Inc., Order and Authorization, 12 FCC Rcd 19556, 19559 (para. 10) (Int'l Bur. 1997) (EarthWatch Order). EarthWatch Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 19559 (para. 10). Id. VisionStar Extension Application at 11. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (WAIT Radio); Northeast Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). See Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. See WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1157. VisionStar Extension Application at 13. See footnote 15, supra, and accompanying text. VisionStar Extension Application at 13; VisionStar
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2480A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2480A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2480A1.txt
  • of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 309(j), 310(d), the applications seeking consent for the assignment of certain C and F block Personal Communications Services licenses from Leap Wireless International, Inc, Debtor-in-Possession, and certain of its subsidiaries to the newly-formed Leap Wireless International, Inc. and its subsidiaries are GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, the requests by Leap Wireless International, Inc, Debtor-in-Possession, and certain of its subsidiaries and Leap Wireless International, Inc. and its subsidiaries for waiver included in the assignment applications are DENIED. Furthermore, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, we GRANT a limited waiver of section 1.2111(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.2111(c) to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2485A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2485A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2485A1.txt
  • decision. For a review of decisions by SLD, appeals to SLD must be filed within 60 days of the issuance of the SLD decision date. Here, Allendale filed its appeal to SLD after the 60-day period, in contravention of our rules. We therefore deny the Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on March 15, 2004 by Allendale County Schools, Allendale, South Carolina IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Renee Sanders, Allendale County Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2493A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2493A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2493A1.txt
  • that the requested waiver be granted. This Order therefore grants Clarity's waiver request. As a result, Clarity may proceed with either TCB certification or Self-Declaration of Conformity pursuant to Part 68 of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.141 and 0.361 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the request for waiver of section 68.317(f) for Model C600, filed by Clarity, A Division of Plantronics, Inc., IS GRANTED to the extent stated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: (1) the volume reset override switch shall be labeled as such
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2533A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2533A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2533A1.txt
  • spectrum to be put into service); see also Pocket Communications, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 12968 (1998) (granting a waiver to promote successful closure to a settlement process resolving litigation and avoiding further delay in the provision of service to the public). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.946(c), 1.955(a)(2), and 24.203. 47 C.F.R. � 1.925. Alternatively, pursuant to section 1.3, the Commission has authority to waive its rules if there is ``good cause'' to do so. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.946, 24.843. Section 1.946(e) also states specific circumstances that would not warrant an extension of time to complete construction. 47 C.F.R. � 1.946(e)(2)-(3).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2534A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2534A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2534A1.txt
  • to receive any high-cost support and ICLS that it qualifies for as of May 22, 2003, the date Grande received its ETC designation. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.314(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.314(d), filed by Grande Communications, Inc. on June 30, 2003, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2535A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2535A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2535A1.txt
  • rules. This waiver will allow Centennial to begin receiving high-cost support as of September 24, 2003, the date Centennial received its ETC designation. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.313(d)(3) of the Commission's rules, filed by Centennial Cellular Tri-State Operating Partnership and Centennial Claiborne Cellular Corp., on November 4, 2003, IS GRANTED, as described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Acting Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Centennial
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-254A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-254A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-254A1.txt
  • on an equal footing. Further, filing an application without the certification page does not constitute substantial compliance, because signature certification is fundamental to the administration of the SLD program. Finally, financial need does not meet the requirement of special circumstances that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Requests filed by Blessed Sacrament, Crutcho, Freedom Area and Milwaukee on July 10, June 11, July 5, and July 8, 2002, respectively, ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau 47 C.F.R. �� 54.502, 54.503.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-255A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-255A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-255A1.txt
  • applicants. As we have consistently held in the past, applicants are responsible for submitting their appeals in a timely manner and complying with program rules and procedures. In this instance, Dunellen failed to comply with the deadline and Dunellen's assertions do not justify a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on September 17, 2003, by Educational Consortium for Telecommunications Savings, on behalf of Dunellen School District, Newtown, Pennsylvania, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-256A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-256A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-256A1.txt
  • interest than strict adherence to the general rule. Parsippany-Troy's reasons are not special circumstances warranting a waiver of the Commission's competitive bidding requirements. We find that SLD's decision is consistent with our precedent and affirm substantially for the reasons stated by SLD. Therefore, we deny Parsippany-Troy's Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Parsippany-Troy Hills Township District, Parsippany, New Jersey on November 5, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda Jones, Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Charles V. Mole, Parsippany-Troy Hills Township District, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-257A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-257A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-257A1.txt
  • the Commission's rules. We have consistently held that it is the applicant who has responsibility ultimately for the accurate and timely submission of the application. Further, we have concluded that detrimental impact alone does not create special circumstances that warrant a waiver. Therefore, we deny the Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Winans Academy of Performing Arts on October 30, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Tony Mottley, Winans Academy of Performing Arts, to Federal Communications Commission, filed October
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2594A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2594A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2594A1.txt
  • Verizon's provision of customer notification and certification to the Commission that complies with all requirements of section 64.1120(e), except the 30-day period waived herein. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.141, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Verizon Corporation, on August 6, 2004, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Nancy Stevenson, Deputy Chief Consumer Policy Division Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau See 2000 Biennial Review-Review of Policies
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2595A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2595A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2595A1.txt
  • Verizon's provision of customer notification and certification to the Commission that complies with all requirements of section 64.1120(e), except the 30-day period waived herein. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.141, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Verizon Corporation, on August 6, 2004, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Nancy Stevenson, Deputy Chief Consumer Policy Division Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau See 2000 Biennial Review-Review of Policies
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-260A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-260A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-260A1.txt
  • the deadline for filing oppositions in both proceedings to March 10, 2004. Replies to the oppositions will be due within 10 days after the time for filing oppositions have expired. IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j) and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j) and 155(c), and Sections 0.61, 0.283, 1.3, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.61, 0.283, 1.3, and 1.46, the deadlines for filing comments and replies in the above-captioned proceedings ARE EXTENDED to the extent described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION W. Kenneth Ferree Chief, Media Bureau Implementation of Section 304 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Commercial Availability of Navigation Devices and Compatibility Between Cable
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2614A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2614A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2614A1.txt
  • Declaratory Ruling for Inclusion of ANIK F1 on the Permitted Space Station List, Order, 15 FCC Rcd. 24828, 24834-35 (paras. 16-17) (2000). See Empresa Brasileira de Telecomica��es S.A., Petition for Declaratory Ruling on Access to Brasilsat A2 Satellite via U.S. Earth Stations, Order, 16 FCC Rcd. 655, 659 (para. 10) (2001) (``Brasilsat A2 Order''). See Petition at 11-12. 47 C.F.R. �1.3. Two-Degree Spacing Order. Id. at paras. 33-43. See In The Matter Of Amendment Of Part 25 Of The Commission's Rules And Regulations To Reduce Alien Carrier Interference Between Fixed-Satellites At Reduced Orbital Spacings And To Revise Application Processing Procedures For Satellite Communication Services, Second Report And Order , CC 86-496, RM-4206, 8 FCC Rcd. 1316,1318 (paras. 10-11) (1993). See Mabuhay
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-261A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-261A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-261A1.txt
  • customer service staff to respond appropriately to problems resulting from inadequate aural carrier separation. Further, in the event of a signal quality problem caused by these set-top boxes or at the request of a subscriber, the cable operator must replace a noncompliant box with a compliant box. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 0.61, 0.283, and 1.3 of the Commission's Rules; 47 C.F.R. �� 0.61, 0.283, & 1.3; the petition of Pace Micro Technology PLC on behalf of itself and Time Warner Cable and Comcast Cable Communications, Inc., for a waiver of Section 76.605(a)(2) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 76.605(a)(2) IS GRANTED for Pace Models 510 and 510A set-top boxes to the extent indicated above.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2668A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2668A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2668A2.txt
  • Communication or related to the sender or recipient of that Domestic Communication and includes without limitation subscriber identification, called party number, calling party number, start time, end time, call duration, feature invocation and deactivation, feature interaction, registration information, user location, diverted to number, conference party numbers, post-cut-through dialed digit extraction, in-band and out-of-band signaling, and party add, drop and hold. 1.3 ``Classified Information'' means any information that has been determined pursuant to Executive Order 12958, or any predecessor or successor order, or the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, or any statute that succeeds or amends the Atomic Energy Act, to require protection against unauthorized disclosure. 1.4 ``Control'' and ``Controls'' means the power, direct or indirect, whether or not exercised, and whether
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2704A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2704A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2704A1.txt
  • 20005-1770. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION James A. Dailey Director, Office of Homeland Security Enforcement Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 11.51(j). See id. Letter from Matthew H. McCormick, Counsel for Hull Broadcasting, Inc. (filed May 4, 2004). Email from Matthew H. McCormick, Counsel for Hull Broadcasting, Inc. (Aug. 3, 2004) (providing supplemental information in response to Commission staff inquiry). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (``Any provision of the rules may be waived by the Commission on its own motion or by petition if good cause therefore is shown."). See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (finding that a waiver is appropriate only if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule and such deviation will serve the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2721A6.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2721A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2721A6.txt
  • may access the FCC Automated Auction System via the FCC Wide Area Network. Minimum Hardware and Software Requirements The following hardware and software, at a minimum, are required to use the FCC Bidding System: CPU: Pentium 133 or above RAM: 32 MB (64 MB recommended) Monitor: VGA or above Mouse or other pointing device "! higher, with Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1_08. Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1_08 is available for downloading at http://java.sun.com/products/archive/index.html In addition, users accessing the FCC Auctions Bidding System via the FCC's Wide Area Network will need: Modem: 28.8 Kbps Hayes(c) compatible modem or faster (56 Kbps recommended) Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) Dialer: Use the Dial-Up Networking feature included with the operating system Connecting to the FCC Wide Area Network To
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-277A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-277A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-277A1.txt
  • Commission's Rules, which require full frequency reuse. PanAmSat states that SBS-4 was constructed and authorized prior to the Commission's adoption of the full frequency reuse requirement. PanAmSat also states that the Commission has never applied the requirement on SBS-4's operation and that grant of the waiver would allow additional service from an orbital location that would otherwise be vacant. Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules provides that waivers may be granted when good cause is shown. According to criteria delineated by the Court of Appeals, a waiver is appropriate when the Commission finds, in light of special circumstances presented in the case at hand, that granting such relief would not undermine the underlying purpose of the rule requirement in question and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-278A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-278A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-278A1.txt
  • a resubmission period to make minor corrections. During each filing period, submitted applications may be updated and amended multiple times until the filing deadline. Software Requirements Applicants will need to meet the following minimum software requirements: Web Browser, either of the following: Microsoft(R) Internet Explorer 4.0 or higher (recommended). Your browser must have either Microsoft VM or Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1_08 installed. www.adobe.com) If you wish to use the download feature on the Search Results page, you will need a .tar file extraction utility, e.g., Winzip (available at http://www.winzip.com) or Pkzip for Windows (available at http://www.pkware.com/shareware). Submitting FCC Form 175 Applications You can submit FCC Form 175 applications electronically via the Internet. Start your web browser and point it to either
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2837A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2837A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2837A1.txt
  • report on or before October 22, 2004. This report shall be addressed to: Suzanne Perrin Room CY-B526 Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 This order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Radhika V. Karmarkar Deputy Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 1.718. See Judware v. Verizon, Order, DA 04-1874, 2004 WL 1432325 (F.C.C.) (June 24,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2878A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2878A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2878A1.txt
  • of ICLS when it missed the deadline due to its own error. We therefore deny South Slope's request for waiver of section 54.307(c). ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.307(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.307(c), filed by South Slope Cooperative Telephone Company on September 22, 2003 IS DENIED, as described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda Jones Acting Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau South Slope Cooperative
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2882A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2882A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2882A1.txt
  • a change in its business plan. Thus, NetSat 28's position is not analogous to that of R/L DBS, and no extension of its milestones is justified. Request to Waive Milestones As an alternative to its milestone extension request, NetSat 28 urges us to waive the rules in this instance to allow NetSat 28 additional time to complete its system. Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules authorizes the Commission to waive its rules for ``good cause shown.'' Waiver is appropriate only if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, and such deviation would better serve the public interest than would strict adherence to the general rule. Circumstances justifying waiver include conditions of hardship, equity, or a more effective implementation of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2885A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2885A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2885A1.txt
  • that filing requirement). Electri City does not argue, and we do not find, either a public interest or administrative convenience rationale to waive the Commission's filing requirements on our own motion. See Goosetown Enterprises, Inc., 16 FCC Rcd 12792 (2001) (Commission has discretion, on its own motion, to accept an improperly re-filed application for administrative convenience reasons pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3). We note that if we considered the Petition on the merits, we would deny the Petition. Renewal applications that are properly filed up to thirty days after the expiration date of the license will be granted nunc pro tunc if the application is otherwise sufficient under the Commission's Rules. See Biennial Regulatory
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2898A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2898A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2898A1.txt
  • Bankruptcy Code. MRP argues that the Commission's universal service contribution calculation methodology would ``result[] in a contribution assessment against MRP that is both inequitable and discriminatory, and which [would] result[] in an assessment that is grossly disproportionate to MRP's [current] end-user telecommunications revenue.'' III. DISCUSSION Petitions for Waiver Filed by Inteleca, RealWorld, Microdevices, and the Gateway Affiliates. Pursuant to section 1.3 of our rules, the Commission's rules may be waived for good cause shown. However, ``an applicant for waiver faces a high hurdle even at the starting gate.'' The Commission may exercise its general discretion to waive a rule where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. A waiver applicant traditionally has a heavy burden to demonstrate
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-28A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-28A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-28A1.txt
  • of "25 kHz equipment" increases the likelihood of causing interference to Federal government stations. If interference is caused, non-Federal users must cease operating and modify operations so as not to cause harmful interference to Federal government stations. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1,925, the Request for Waiver filed by the County of Dukes County, Massachusetts, on January 18, 2002, IS GRANTED, as set forth above. , above. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.131 and 0.331 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 0.331. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2914A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2914A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2914A1.txt
  • 2000 U.S. Census population of 680 people. Crawford further states that Olustee has its own mayor and city hall, post office, volunteer fire department, police department, schools, and churches. 4. A staff engineering analysis indicates that Channel 252A can be allotted to Olustee consistent with the minimum distance separation requirements of the Commission's rules with a site restriction 2.0 kilometers (1.3 miles) east of the community at coordinates 34-33-00 NL and 99-24-00 WL. Additionally, the engineering analysis indicates that the reference coordinates for vacant Channel 253C3 at Wellington can be modified consistent with minimum distance separation requirements of the Commission's Rules with a site restriction 8.5 kilometers (5.3 miles) west of the community at coordinates 34-53-00 NL and 100-18-00 WL. Crawford's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-295A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-295A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-295A1.txt
  • warranted, which would eviscerate the benefits of having a filing window at all. In light of this, we do not believe that the denial of Fennville's request creates the special circumstances or particular facts that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. Therefore, we deny the Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Fennville Public Schools on December 9, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Jody Osbon/M. Klosner, Fennville Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed April 15, 2003
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2964A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2964A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2964A1.txt
  • that the requested waiver be granted. This Order therefore grants Clarity's waiver request. As a result, Clarity may proceed with either TCB certification or Self-Declaration of Conformity pursuant to Part 68 of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.141 and 0.361 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the request for waiver of section 68.317(f) for Model C440, filed by Clarity, A Division of Plantronics, Inc., IS GRANTED to the extent stated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: (1) the volume reset override switch shall be labeled as such
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2972A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2972A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2972A1.txt
  • of this dispute and by postponing the need for litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3, 1.716-18, and 1.720-1.736 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.716-18, 1.720-36, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Request to Convert IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-297A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-297A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-297A1.txt
  • from the general rule, and such deviation would better serve the public interest than strict adherence to the general rule. Griswold's misunderstanding of the Commission's rules is not a special circumstance warranting a waiver of the filing window. Therefore, we affirm SLD and deny Griswold's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Griswold Community Schools, Griswold, Iowa, on May 10, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Rich Mortensen, Griswold Community School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed May
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3005A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3005A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3005A1.txt
  • a resubmission period to make minor corrections. During each filing period, submitted applications may be updated and amended multiple times until the filing deadline. Software Requirements Applicants will need to meet the following minimum software requirements: Web Browser, either of the following: Microsoft(R) Internet Explorer 4.0 or higher (recommended). Your browser must have either Microsoft VM or Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1_08 installed. you wish to use the download feature on the Search Results page, you will need a .tar file extraction utility, e.g., Winzip (available at http://www.winzip.com) or Pkzip for Windows (available at http://www.pkware.com/shareware). Submitting FCC Form 175 Applications To submit FCC Form 175 applications electronically via the Internet, start your web browser and point it to either http://auctions.fcc.gov/ (primary location)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3005A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3005A4.txt
  • 56 24.5 N 119 15 22.0 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 2 45 56 0.2 N 119 19 17.5 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 2 45 55 18.7 N 119 21 48.0 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 2 45 55 7 N 119 25 51.1 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 2 45 47 45.7 N 119 26 2.6 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 2 45 36 11.1 N 119 26 1.3 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 2 45 36 7.7 N 119 14 50.1 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 2 45 30 58.9 N 119 14 50.1 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 2 45 30 58.2 N 119 8 39.1 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 2 45 4 59.3 N 119 8 43.5 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 2 45 4 59.3 N 119 9 43.8 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 2 44
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-301A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-301A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-301A1.txt
  • warranted, which would eviscerate the benefits of having a filing window at all. In light of this, we do not believe that the denial of Maine's request creates the special circumstances or particular facts that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. Therefore, we deny the Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Maine School Administrative District No. 20 on September 19, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Jeannette Condon, Maine School Administrative District No. 20, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-303A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-303A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-303A1.txt
  • submission of the application. Moreover, Meade's assertion that denial of its application may have a detrimental impact on the service it provides to its patrons does not create the special circumstances or particular facts that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. Therefore, we deny the Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Meade County Public Library on December 10, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from James Mitchell, Meade County Public Library, to Federal Communications Commission, filed December 10,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3044A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3044A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3044A1.txt
  • and timely payment, as required by Section 1.2109(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.2109(a), for the license in question. Accordingly, we hereby grant DTV's captioned application for the license for the New York market (MVD001), effective upon release of the instant Order. This grant is conditioned on DTV meeting the cross-ownership limits. Turning to the Waiver Request, Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules authorizes us to grant waivers ``if good cause therefor is shown.'' More specifically for the Wireless Radio Services, Section 1.925 permits us to grant a request for waiver if it is shown that: (1) the underlying purpose of the rule would not be served or would be frustrated by application to the instant case, and that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-304A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-304A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-304A1.txt
  • applications that SLD must review and process each year, it is administratively necessary to require an applicant to be responsible for providing complete and accurate information. Further, the Commission has consistently held that it is the applicant who has responsibility ultimately for the timely submission of the application. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed by Olathe Public Library on January 17, 2003 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Mary Linse, Olathe Public Library, to Federal Communications Commission, filed January 17, 2003
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-305A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-305A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-305A1.txt
  • to the filing of the application out of window is not a special circumstance warranting a waiver of the filing window. The Commission has consistently held that it is the applicant who has responsibility ultimately for the timely submission of the application. Therefore, we deny the Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Pratt Unified School District No. 382 on December 10, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Bob Lee, Pratt Unified School District No. 382, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-307A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-307A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-307A1.txt
  • staff contributed to the late submission of FCC Form 470 is not a special circumstance warranting a waiver of our rules. The Commission has consistently held that it is the applicant who has responsibility ultimately for the timely submission of the application. Therefore, we deny the Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed by St. Boniface School on January 15, 2003 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Marylou Pawlowski, St. Boniface School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed January 15, 2003
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3087A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3087A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3087A1.txt
  • public interest by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 5. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.722 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.722, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that Innovative's Petition for waiver and extension of time IS GRANTED. 6. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadline for AT&T to file a supplemental complaint
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-309A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-309A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-309A1.txt
  • which would eviscerate the benefits of having a filing window at all. In light of this, we do not believe that the denial of South Dakota's application creates the special circumstances or particular facts that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. Therefore, we deny the Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by South Dakota Department of Education and Cultural Affairs on January 21, 2003 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Tammy Bauck, South Dakota Department of Education and Cultural
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-310A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-310A1.pdf
  • applicant to be responsible for providing complete and accurate information. Further, we have consistently held that it is the applicant who has responsibility ultimately for the timely submission of the application. Applicants must comply with program rules, including the application deadline, in order to be eligible for discounts. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Waterville-Elysian-Morristown Public School on November 14, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Joel Whitehurst, Waterville-Elysian-Morristown Public School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed November 14, 2002
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3162A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3162A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3162A1.txt
  • 11. EchoStar expresses its willingness to comply with footnote NG104 and footnote 2 of Section 25.202(a)(1) in the event that the Commission does not grant the requisite waiver requests. In this event, EchoStar states it is prepared to conduct uplink transmissions exclusively from other countries, thereby operating the system in a manner that would qualify as international service. 12. Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules authorizes the Commission to waive its rules for ``good cause shown.'' Waiver is appropriate only if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, and such deviation would better serve the public interest than would strict adherence to the general rule. Generally, the Commission may grant a waiver of its rules in a particular case
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3163A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3163A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3163A1.txt
  • 11. EchoStar expresses its willingness to comply with footnote NG104 and footnote 2 of Section 25.202(a)(1) in the event that the Commission does not grant the requisite waiver requests. In this event, EchoStar states it is prepared to conduct uplink transmissions exclusively from other countries, thereby operating the system in a manner that would qualify as international service. 12. Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules authorizes the Commission to waive its rules for ``good cause shown.'' Waiver is appropriate only if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, and such deviation would better serve the public interest than would strict adherence to the general rule. Generally, the Commission may grant a waiver of its rules in a particular case
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3164A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3164A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3164A1.txt
  • 12. EchoStar expresses its willingness to comply with footnote NG104 and footnote 2 of Section 25.202(a)(1) in the event that the Commission does not grant the requisite waiver requests. In this event, EchoStar states it is prepared to conduct uplink transmissions exclusively from other countries, thereby operating the system in a manner that would qualify as international service. 13. Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules authorizes the Commission to waive its rules for ``good cause shown.'' Waiver is appropriate only if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, and such deviation would better serve the public interest than would strict adherence to the general rule. Generally, the Commission may grant a waiver of its rules in a particular case
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3164A1_Erratum.doc
  • 12. EchoStar expresses its willingness to comply with footnote NG104 and footnote 2 of Section 25.202(a)(1) in the event that the Commission does not grant the requisite waiver requests. In this event, EchoStar states it is prepared to conduct uplink transmissions exclusively from other countries, thereby operating the system in a manner that would qualify as international service. 13. Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules authorizes the Commission to waive its rules for ``good cause shown.'' Waiver is appropriate only if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, and such deviation would better serve the public interest than would strict adherence to the general rule. Generally, the Commission may grant a waiver of its rules in a particular case
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3167A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3167A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3167A1.txt
  • filing deadline for the conversion of these EUCL informal complaints into formal complaints. Because this extension will facilitate the possible settlement of these numerous claims, we are satisfied that our action today serves the public interest. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 208, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and the authority delegated by sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111 and 0.311, that section 1.718(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.718(a), IS HEREBY WAIVED, with regard to the IPP EUCL informal complaints described herein and the deadline for the conversion and filing of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3180A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3180A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3180A1.txt
  • requested waiver be granted. This Order therefore grants Tandy Electronics' waiver request. As a result, Tandy Electronics may proceed with either TCB certification or Self-Declaration of Conformity pursuant to Part 68 of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.141 and 0.361 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the request for waiver of section 68.317(f) for Model 43-2232, filed by Tandy Electronics (China) Ltd., IS GRANTED to the extent stated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: (1) the volume reset override switch shall be labeled as such and located
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3193A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3193A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3193A1.txt
  • and by filing the corrected version shortly after being apprised of any mistake. Moreover, the deadline involved a first-time information request. The Petitioners sought discounts only for telecommunications services, and the Commission has authority to waive the deadline with respect to requests that involve only telecommunications services. 3. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 , and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Waiver filed by the Chesterfield County Public Schools, Chesterfield, Virginia, on July 23, 2003; Georgia Technology Authority, Atlanta, Georgia, on December 16, 2002; Columbus School District, Columbus, Wisconsin, on January 30, 2003; and School District of Wisconsin Dells, Wisconsin Dells, Wisconsin,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3265A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3265A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3265A1.txt
  • parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. We are not satisfied, however, that the additional safeguard requested by ACS is necessary and/or serves the public interest. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3, 1.716-18, and 1.720-1.736 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.716-18, 1.720-36, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Joint Motion to Dismiss Claims Against ACS of Fairbanks, Inc. and ACS of Alaska, Inc.; Request to Convert Claims Against ACS of Anchorage, Inc. to Claims in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3394A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3394A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3394A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of MCI IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section 1.718 of our rules, 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-343A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-343A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-343A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section 1.718 of our rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3442A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3442A1.txt
  • Place with a 2000 U.S. Census population of 263 persons. El Indio has its own post office and zip code, community center, several churches and a number of local businesses serving the residents of the community. Channel 236A can be allotted to El Indio, in compliance with the Commission's minimum distance separation requirements, provided there is a site restriction of 1.3 kilometers (0.8 miles) southeast of the community at coordinates 28-30-22 NL and 100-18-03 WL. Additionally, Mexican concurrence was requested for the El Indio allotment since the community is located within 320 kilometers of the U.S.-Mexican border. The Mexican government has accepted concurrence for this allotment. 3. The Commission will send a copy of this Report and Order in a report
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-344A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-344A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-344A1.txt
  • applicants are responsible for submitting their appeals in a timely manner and complying with program rules and procedures. Merely stating that a letter or notice was not received at the address provided to SLD and to which prior correspondence had been successfully mailed is insufficient grounds for reconsideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed on July 31, 2003, by Education Legislative Service, Inc., El Cajon, California and Oakland Unified School District, Oakland, California, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3467A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3467A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3467A1.txt
  • report on or before December 17, 2004. This report shall be addressed to: Suzanne Perrin Room 4-B522 Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 This Order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Radhika V. Karmarkar Deputy Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 1.718. See Judware v. Verizon, Order, DA 04-2837, 2004 WL 1944886 (F.C.C.) (September 1,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3553A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3553A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3553A1.txt
  • Letter from Lon C. Levin, Vice President, MSV, to the FCC Secretary dated Aug. 2, 2004, filed as attachment to letter from Henry Goldberg, Attorney for Motient, Inc., to the FCC Secretary, also dated Aug. 2, 2004. Also see letter from Lon C. Levin to the FCC Secretary dated Oct. 4, 2004 (modifying request for expedited action). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See Northeast Cellular Telephone Co., LP v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990) and WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969). 47 U.S.C. � 310(b)(4). MSV ATC Application, Form 312, Attachment 2. Motient Services Inc. and TMI Communications and Company, LP, Assignors, and Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary, LLC, Assignee, Order and Authorization, 16 FCC Rcd 20469
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3554A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3554A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3554A1.txt
  • properly reclassified as a Class C0 station, it will apply to upgrade KRVG(FM) to Class C1 status. See Application No. BALH-20030530BLR. Cool Radio, LLC filed a petition to deny this application (and other applications in the transaction) on July 10, 2003. The application was granted May 28, 2004 and consummated July 9, 2004. AGM and NRC cite 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 and WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969). The Class C1 KIDN-FM facility envisioned by AGM and NRC would increase the station's population coverage from 13,482 to 31,159 (2000 Census data). Puopolo objection at 3. Jacor and Citicasters cite Melody Music, 345 F.2d 730 (D.C. Cir. 1965). Streamlining of Radio Technical Rules in Parts 73 and 74
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3564A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3564A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3564A1.txt
  • have a detrimental impact on a request does not create special circumstances or particular facts that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. In keeping with our prior decisions, we determine that the Petitioners here have not demonstrated the special circumstances necessary for a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed July 6, 2004, by Grace Lutheran Day School, Queens Village, New York; August 30, 2004, by Messenger Public Library of North Aurora, North Aurora, Illinois; July 2, 2004, by Mosaica Education, Inc., Wilmington, Delaware; June 17, 2004, by Pike County
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3569A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3569A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3569A1.txt
  • 0.111, 0.311, and 1.727 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, and 1.727, Verizon's Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Defer, is GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3, 1.716-1.718, and 1.720-1.736 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.716-1.718, and 1.720-36, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111 and 0.311, Broadview's formal complaint of December 30, 2003 SHALL BE CONVERTED into an informal complaint with a designated filing date of December 30, 2003, and that the formal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-357A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-357A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-357A1.txt
  • and (2) Asset Purchase Agreement between Intelsat and Loral (dated July 15, 2003) See, also supra paras. 5, 15. StarBand filed a Petition to Adopt Conditions to Applications, or Absent Conditions, to Deny (dated Dec. 12, 2003) (``StarBand Petition''). Included with StarBand's Petition was a Motion to Waive for Good Cause Section 25.154(a)(2) of the Commission's Rules Pursuant to Section 1.3 of Those Rules. Loral filed an opposition to StarBand's request for waiver. Based on our review, we grant, pursuant to Section 1.3 of our rules, StarBand's motion and accept the late-filed pleadings filed by StarBand and Loral. We find that inclusion of these comments will facilitate resolution of this case based upon a full and complete factual record. Opposition to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3669A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3669A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3669A1.txt
  • 499-A Revision Order'' and sent to the Universal Service Administrative Company, 2000 L Street, N.W., Suite 200, Washington, DC 20036. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1, 4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 254, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.711 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.711, this Order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE thirty days after publication in the Federal Register. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1, 4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 254, and the authority delegated
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-367A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-367A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-367A1.txt
  • decision. For a review of decisions by SLD, appeals to SLD must be filed within 60 days of the issuance of the SLD decision date. Here, Blackstone filed its appeal to SLD after the 60-day period, in contravention of our rules. We therefore deny the Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on September 8, 2003, by Nottoway County Library, on behalf of Blackstone Public Library, Crewe, Virginia, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Nancy Pierce, Blackstone Public Library,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-370A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-370A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-370A1.txt
  • to an application filed by Chicago Public Schools, Chicago, Illinois. Specifically, Systems Concepts seeks waiver of the Commission's rules for FRN 712607. Upon review of the record, however, we find that Chicago Public Schools cancelled FRN 712607. Accordingly, the Division dismisses Systems Concepts' Request for Waiver as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed by Systems Concepts, Inc., Chicago, Illinois, on October 18, 2002, IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Cynthia Nielsen-Morgan, Systems Concepts, Inc., to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-379A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-379A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-379A1.txt
  • compliance with the verification requirements of �� 64.1100-1190, including third party verification, for those affected end-users that ultimately select BellSouth as their service provider. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.141, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, 1.3, the waiver request filed by BellSouth Telecommunications, on January 22, 2004, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Nancy A. Stevenson, Acting Deputy Chief, Policy Division Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau See 2000 Biennial Review-Review of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-380A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-380A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-380A1.txt
  • of 5 persons per square mile; the Hastings BTA has a population density of 15 persons per square mile; and the North Platte BTA has a population density of 5 persons per square mile. See Id. at 2 (citing 2000 Census data). Id. Id. Petition Supplement at 3. Id. Id. at 3-4. 47 C.F.R. � 1.925. Alternatively, pursuant to section 1.3, the Commission has authority to waive its rules if there is ``good cause'' to do so. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990). We note that the Commission recently initiated a rule making proceeding to focus upon ways in which the Commission can facilitate the provision of spectrum-based services
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3867A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3867A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3867A1.txt
  • to the authority granted in Sections 4(i), 309(j), and 310(d) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 309(j), 310(d), the applications seeking consent for the assignment of C and F block Personal Communications Services licenses from the Summit DIPs to the Liquidating Trust are GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, we GRANT a limited waiver of section 1.2111(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.2111(c) to the extent described herein. These actions are taken under delegated authority pursuant to sections 0.131 and 0.331 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 0.331. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION John B. Muleta Chief Wireless Telecommunications Bureau See ULS File Nos. 0001895955, 0001896022,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3871A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3871A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3871A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of MCI IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section 1.718 of our rules, 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3881A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3881A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3881A1.txt
  • it to extend its intermodal LNP end-user charge for one month at 30 cents upon the expiration of its current 47-cent charge. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1, 2, 4(i), 201-205, 215, 251, and 332 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 152, 154(i), 201-205, 215, 251, 332, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, we GRANT a waiver of the requirements established in paragraph 18 of the BellSouth Waiver Order to the extent necessary to allow Sprint to extend its intermodal LNP end-user charge recovery period for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3885A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3885A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3885A1.txt
  • the list of routes exempt from the ISP filed by AT&T on February 27, 2004, ISP-PDR-20040227-00011, is DISMISSED. This Order is issued pursuant to sections 1, 2, 4(i), 4(j), 5(c), 201-205, 214 and 303(r) 309 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 152, 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), 201-205, 214 and 303(r), 309 and sections 0.51, 0.261, 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.261, 1.3 and is effective upon release. Petitions for reconsideration under 1.106 or applications for review under section 1.115 of the Commission's Rules may be filed within 30 days of the date of public notice of this Order (see C.F.R. section 1.4(b)(2)). FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION James L. Ball Chief, Policy Division International
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3895A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3895A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3895A1.txt
  • there is only one provider in Raymond-Knowles's service area does not relieve Raymond-Knowles of the responsibility to comply with program rules. The Commission has consistently held that it is the applicant who has responsibility ultimately for the timely submission of the application. Therefore, we deny the Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed by Raymond-Knowles Elementary School, on July 23, 2002, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Linda Lamont, Raymond-Knowles Elementary School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed July 23, 2002
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3903A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3903A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3903A1.txt
  • Verizon that such a result was inconsistent with the public interest since it was the Commission's intention not to use a carrier's projected collected first quarter 2003 information for billing purposes. Discussion We grant Petitioners' requests for waivers of the Commission's universal service true-up procedures for 2003 and conclude that the Petitioners demonstrated good cause to justify the waiver. Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules provides that waiver of a rule may be granted upon ``good cause shown.'' Commission rules are presumed valid, however, and an applicant for waiver bears a heavy burden. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule ``only if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule and such deviation will serve the public
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3918A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3918A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3918A1.txt
  • will be conducted over the Internet, and telephonic bidding will be available as well. As a contingency plan, bidders may also dial in to the FCC Wide Area Network. Electronic Bidding: Applicants are reminded that qualified bidders are eligible to bid either electronically or telephonically. Applicants should specify their bidding preference on the FCC Form 175. "! Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1_08. Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1_08 is available for downloading at http://java.sun.com/products/archive/index.html Other browsers are not supported. As a contingency plan, bidders can also access the FCC Automated Auction System by dialing in to the FCC's Wide Area Network. Bidders dialing in to the FCC's Wide Area Network will need: Modem: 28.8 Kbps Hayes(c) compatible modem or faster (56 Kbps recommended) Point-to-Point
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3978A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3978A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3978A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that Verizon's request for extension IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3985A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3985A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3985A1.txt
  • a resubmission period to make minor corrections. During each filing period, submitted applications may be updated and amended multiple times until the filing deadline. Software Requirements Applicants will need to meet the following minimum software requirements: Web Browser, either of the following: Microsoft(R) Internet Explorer 4.0 or higher (recommended). Your browser must have either Microsoft VM or Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1_08 installed. ader 5.0 or higher (available at http://www.adobe.com) If you wish to use the download feature on the Search Results page, you will need a .tar file extraction utility, e.g., Winzip (available at http://www.winzip.com) or Pkzip for Windows (available at http://www.pkware.com/shareware). Submitting FCC Form 175 Applications To submit FCC Form 175 applications electronically via the Internet, start your web browser
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3990A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3990A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3990A1.txt
  • Verizon's provision of customer notification and certification to the Commission that complies with all requirements of section 64.1120(e), except the 30-day period waived herein. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.141, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Verizon Corporation, on August 6, 2004, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Nancy Stevenson, Deputy Chief Consumer Policy Division Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau See 2000 Biennial Review-Review of Policies
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-401A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-401A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-401A1.txt
  • fill previously unused capacity on the satellite. Additionally, Intelsat argues that this available capacity would be used to fulfill service requirements of new customers in ITU Region 2, further serving the public interest in meeting growing consumer service needs. Lastly, Intelsat claims that the use of these frequencies will expand the presence of U.S. satellite operators in Latin America. Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules authorizes the Commission to waive its rules for ``good cause shown.'' Waiver is appropriate only if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, and such deviation would better serve the public interest than would strict adherence to the general rule. Generally, the Commission may grant a waiver of its rules in a particular case
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-4022A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-4022A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-4022A1.txt
  • order, a notice of intent to convert its informal complaint into a formal complaint. Any informal complainant who does not submit such notice shall waive its right to convert its informal complaint into a formal complaint. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 208, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and the authority delegated by sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111 and 0.311, that section 1.718(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.718(a), IS HEREBY WAIVED, with regard to the IPP EUCL informal complaints described herein and the deadline for the conversion and filing of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-404A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-404A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-404A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 04-404 February 18, 2004 PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR COMMENTS ON BELLSOUTH'S PETITION FOR WAIVER CC Docket Nos. 01-338, 96-98, 98-147 Comments Due: March 19, 2004 Reply Comments Due: April 5, 2004 On February 11, 2004, BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. (BellSouth) filed a petition for waiver, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, seeking a temporary waiver of its obligation to provide certain unbundled network elements (UNEs) under the Commission's commingling and service eligibility requirements, as set forth in the Triennial Review Order. Because the rules from which BellSouth seeks temporary waiver primarily affect enhanced extended loops (EELs) which are combinations of loop and interoffice transport elements, BellSouth asserts
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-4067A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-4067A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-4067A1.txt
  • Holdings I, LP, 17 FCC Rcd 14498, 14504 (WTB 2002) (Bureau affirms the waiver standard is satisfied because of intervening unanticipated changes in the auction required by the Auction Reform Act, and therefore, qualified bidders may select additional licenses). 47 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(3). Additionally, the Commission may grant a waiver upon a showing of good cause. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105(a)(1). 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105(a)(2). 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105(a)(2)(i). See Implementation of Section 309(j) of the Communications Act - Competitive Bidding, PP Docket No. 92-253, Second Report and Order, 9 FCC Rcd 2348, 2375-77 (1994). See Letter from Gary D. Michaels, Deputy Chief, Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau. to F. Scott Fistel, counsel for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-408A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-408A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-408A1.txt
  • division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See In the Matter of Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9221 (2003). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). Request for Review. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). Letter from the School and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Allison Cioffi, Maricopa County School Superintendent's Office, dated March 17, 2003. Letter from Dr. Allison Cioffi, Maricopa County School Superintendent's Office, to Universal Service Administrative Company, filed June 26, 2003. See Request for Review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-429A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-429A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-429A1.txt
  • the thousands of applications SLD processes each year, it is administratively necessary to place the burden of meeting deadlines on the applicants. As we have consistently held in the past, applicants are responsible for submitting their appeals in a timely manner and complying with program rules and procedures. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on April 21, 2003, by Sunnyside School District, Sunnyside, Washington, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-432A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-432A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-432A1.txt
  • we find that it is administratively necessary to require an applicant to be responsible for carefully following program rules. Further, the Commission has consistently held that it is the applicant who has responsibility ultimately for the timely submission of the application. Coleman's Request for Waiver is therefore denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed by Coleman Community Schools on January 23, 2003 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones, Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Allen Spalding, Coleman Community Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed January 23, 2003
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-434A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-434A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-434A1.txt
  • termination rate for U.S.-inbound traffic differs from the rate for U.S.-outbound traffic. Consequently, as there would be violations of the nondiscrimination and symmetry requirements of the ISP, Petitioners have submitted requests for waiver of the ISP. We do not find sufficient basis in the waiver requests or the record to grant a waiver for good cause shown. Pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, a waiver of a rule may be granted where good cause is shown. Good cause is demonstrated where special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, such deviation serves the public interest, and a waiver would be consistent with the principles underlying the rule. In reviewing the Commission's waiver rule, the United States Court of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-460A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-460A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-460A1.txt
  • start of the first funding year following the effective date of the statute. Because Aleutians East was receiving discounts on Internet access, and was therefore subject to the October 28, 2001 deadline imposed by the CIPA statute, we are without authority to waive that deadline in this case. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3,and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Aleutians East Borough School District on February 12, 2003, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Wesley L. Knapp, Ph.D, Aleutians East Borough School District, to Schools and Libraries
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-461A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-461A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-461A1.txt
  • 470 and/or Form 470 RNL; or (2) checked the website to make certain that its Form 470 had been posted. The Bureau has consistently held that it is the applicant who has responsibility ultimately for the timely submission of the application. Fredonia's Request for Waiver is therefore denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Fredonia-Moccasin Unified School District No. 6 on December 5, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Steven L. Winward, Fredonia-Moccasin Unified School District No. 6, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-462A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-462A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-462A1.txt
  • a waiver of our rules. We therefore deny Tallulah Falls' waiver request. Unified Niobrara-Lynch Schools Niobrara-Lynch stated that it missed the deadline because of staffing problems. Staffing problems do not relieve applicants of their responsibility to comply with our rules and procedures. Accordingly, Niobrara-Lynch's waiver request is denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Waiver filed by Freehold Regional High School District, Englishtown, New Jersey, on September 12, 2002; Giltner Public Schools, Giltner, Nebraska, on July 10, 2002; Gold Oak Union Elementary School, Placerville, California, on March 11, 2002; Pine Castle Christian Academy, Orlando, Florida, on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-463A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-463A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-463A1.txt
  • year and by filing the corrected version shortly after being apprised of the mistake. Moreover, the deadline involved a first-time information request. Stafford also sought discounts only for telecommunications services, and the Commission has authority to waive the deadline with respect to requests that involve only telecommunications services. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed by Stafford Public Schools, Stafford Springs, Connecticut on November 5, 2002 IS GRANTED and REMANDED TO SLD to the extent provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Jill
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-465A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-465A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-465A1.txt
  • to .00220 in order to collect the additional monies needed over the remaining months of the fund year. As a result of this adjustment to the carrier contribution factor, NECA predicts that the total TRS fund size will increase from $115,455,570 to $170,500,000. ORDERING CLAUSES 9. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in Sections 0.141, 0.361, 1.3 of the Commission Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, 1.3, this Order is ADOPTED. 10. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the requirement that TRS providers offer three-way calling functionality as part of the TRS mandatory minimum standards is waived for one year until February 24, 2005. 11. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the AT&T Waiver Request is GRANTED to the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-526A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-526A1.txt
  • to those set forth in the Middlesboro/Somerset Extension Request). See January 24th Order at 802 � 5. Id. Northstar Petition at 4-5. Northstar is the C Block licensee of the Corbin BTA. Northstar Petition at 5. Id. at 7. Id. at 8. Id. Id. at 10-13. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.946(c), 1.955(a)(2), 24.203. 47 C.F.R. � 1.925. Alternatively, pursuant to section 1.3, the Commission has authority to waive its rules if there is ``good cause'' to do so. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.946, 24.843. Section 1.946(e) also states specific circumstances that would not warrant an extension of time to complete construction. 47 C.F.R. � 1.946(e)(2)-(3).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-572A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-572A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-572A1.txt
  • for the timely submission of its application. As a result, neither employee illness nor misunderstanding relieves applicants of their responsibility to understand and comply with the program rules or procedures. Consistent with existing precedent as described above, the Telecommunications Access Policy Division denies the above-captioned Requests for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the requests filed by Jackson Public School District, Jackson, Mississippi, on December 5, 2002; Stafford Public Schools, Stafford Springs, Connecticut, on October 23, 2002; Syosset Central School District, Syosset, New York, on November 14, 2002; Villa Park School District 45, Villa Park, Illinois, on December
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-577A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-577A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-577A1.txt
  • report on or before April 16, 2004. This report shall be addressed to: Suzanne Perrin Room CY-B526 Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau Federal Communication Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 This order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Radhika V. Karmarkar Deputy Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 1.718. See Judware v. Verizon, Order, DA 03-4110, 2003 WL 23095472 (F.C.C.) (December 31,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-589A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-589A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-589A1.txt
  • responsible for submitting their appeals in a timely manner and complying with program rules and procedures. In this instance, Albuquerque failed to comply with the deadline. This failure based on Albuquerque misunderstanding of the program rules does not constitute special circumstance to justify a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on August 7, 2003, by Albuquerque Public Schools, Albuquerque, New Mexico, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-597A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-597A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-597A1.txt
  • or after August 13, 2001, appeals to the Commission must be filed within 60 days of the issuance of the SLD decision date. Here, Jesse Jackson Academy filed its appeal on December 29, 2003, after the 60-day period, in contravention of our rules. We therefore dismiss the appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Jesse Jackson Academy, Houston, Texas on December 29, 2003, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Jesse W. Jackson, Jesse Jackson Academy, Houston, Texas, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-622A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-622A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-622A1.txt
  • that the requested waiver be granted. This Order therefore grants Clarity's waiver request. As a result, Clarity may proceed with either TCB certification or Self-Declaration of Conformity pursuant to Part 68 of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.141 and 0.361 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the request for waiver of section 68.317(f) for Model CLS45i, filed by Clarity, A Division of Plantronics, Inc., IS GRANTED to the extent stated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: (1) the volume reset override switch shall be labeled as such
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-633A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-633A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-633A1.txt
  • the FCC Form 175, will assist the Commission in monitoring the participation of these ``designated entities'' in its auctions. Exhibit F - Miscellaneous Information: Applicants wishing to submit additional information should also include it in Exhibit F. Waivers: Applicants requesting waiver of any rules must submit a statement of reasons sufficient to justify the waiver sought. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925. Certifications: Applicants should carefully read the list of certifications on the FCC Form 175. These certifications help to ensure a fair and competitive auction and require, among other things, disclosure to the Commission of certain information on applicant ownership and agreements or arrangements concerning the auction. Submission of an FCC Form 175 application constitutes a representation by the certifying
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-753A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-753A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-753A1.txt
  • authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Joint Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice the Complaint against the Remaining Defendants IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3, 1.716-18, and 1.720-1.736 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.716-18, 1.720-36, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Complainants' formal complaint is converted to an informal complaint, and that the formal complaint and answer filed in the above-captioned proceeding satisfy sections 1.716-17 of the Commission's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-764A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-764A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-764A1.txt
  • that the requested waiver be granted. This Order therefore grants Geemarc's waiver request. As a result, Geemarc may proceed with either TCB certification or Self-Declaration of Conformity pursuant to Part 68 of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.141 and 0.361 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the request for waiver of section 68.317(f) for Models CLA30, CLA40, CS-IL30, CS-IL40, BT-IL30, and BT-IL40, filed by Geemarc Telecom International Ltd., IS GRANTED to the extent stated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: (1) the volume reset override switch shall
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-908A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-908A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-908A1.txt
  • (to operate EchoStar 4 at 119.35� W.L.); SAT-STA-20010626-00060 (to operate EchoStar 4 at 119.35� W.L.); SAT-STA-20011221-00144 (to operate EchoStar 4 at 119.35� W.L.); SAT-STA-20020617-00096 (to operate EchoStar 4 at 119.35� W.L.); and SAT-STA-20021223-00243 (to operate EchoStar 4 at 119.35� W.L.). EchoStar Assignment Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 9398. 47 C.F.R. � 25.148(c). EchoStar Modification Application at 7. 47 C.F.R � 1.3. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). Wait Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969). EchoStar Satellite Corporation, Authority to Make Minor Modification of Direct Broadcast Satellite, Order and Authorization, 18 FCC Rcd 7886 (Sat. Div., Int'l Bur. 2003). EchoStar Modification Application at 7. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-980A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-980A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-980A1.txt
  • its obligation to guard against the occurrence of errors and fraud. Furthermore, if applicants were permitted to amend their requests after the filing window closed, it could jeopardize SLD's ability to accurately apply the rules of priority in years where requests for funding exceed the annual funding cap. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Donna Public Library, Donna, Texas, on October 18, 2002, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal regarding SLD application numbers 320003 and 324627, ARE DENIED. IT IS FURTHERED ORDERED, pursuant to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-981A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-981A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-981A1.txt
  • The Commission subsequently modified its rules so that appeals to the Administrator or the Commission are filed on the date they are postmarked. This rule was made effective on July 20, 2003. See In the Matter of Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Order, 18 FCC Rcd 9222, para. 57 (2003). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). See Request for Review by Anderson School Staatsburg, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Changes to the Board of Directors of the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., File No. SLD-133664, CC Docket Nos. 96-45 and 97-21, Order, 15 FCC Rcd 25610 (Com. Car. Bur. rel. Nov.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-983A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-983A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-983A1.txt
  • responsible for submitting their appeals in a timely manner and complying with program rules and procedures. In this instance, Murchison ISD failed to comply with the deadline. This failure based on misunderstanding of the program rules does not constitute special circumstance to justify a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on February 21, 2003, by Murchison Independent School District, Murchison, Texas, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-984A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-984A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-984A1.txt
  • have a detrimental impact on an applicant does not create special circumstances or particular facts that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. In keeping with our prior decisions, we determine that the applicants here have not demonstrated the special circumstances necessary for a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Waiver filed by Sacred Heart School, Danbury, Connecticut on May 28, 2003; GEMS Academy, Humble, Texas on June 16, 2003; Pawnee Independent School District, Pawnee, Texas on June 4, 2003; Adel Elementary Lake County School District #21, Adel, Oregon on May 8,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1002A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1002A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1002A1.txt
  • it is not requesting waiver of the requirement that it provide Phase II service to 100 percent of the Boone PSAP's operating area or population within eighteen months of a PSAP request. discussion APPLICABLE WAIVER STANDARDS The Commission has recognized that smaller carriers may face extraordinary circumstances in meeting one or more of the deadlines for Phase II deployment. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules establishes that the Commission may grant relief from its rules for good cause shown. The Commission generally finds good cause to grant a waiver of its rules where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest if applied to the petitioner and when the relief requested would not undermine the policy objective of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1039A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1039A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1039A1.txt
  • replies electronically are reminded they are still required to serve copies in accordance with these rules as stated herein. III. ORDERING CLAUSE 14. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4 (i) and (j), 201-209, of the Communications Act, as amended, this order is HEREBY ADOPTED as described above. 15. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commissions rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, section 61.49(k) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 61.49(k), IS WAIVED for the purpose specified in paragraph 4 supra. 16. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, sections 1.4(f) and 1.773(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.4(f), 1.773(b) ARE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1045A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1045A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1045A1.txt
  • extension serves the public interest by allowing incumbent LECs to implement revised PIC change charges at one time, rather than in a piecemeal fashion, which could create customer confusion. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 1-4, 201, 203, 205, and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154, 201, 203, 205, and 403, sections 1.3 and 1.41 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 1.41, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91 and 0.291, that the informal request of the incumbent LECs for a limited waiver of the date for filing tariff revisions related to the PIC Change Charge Order IS GRANTED, to the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1057A5.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1057A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1057A5.txt
  • or areas of a screen (e.g., Location field, Selected Licenses area of a screen). bold italic Represents characters that you must type exactly as they appear in the instructions. For example, if you are instructed to type http://auctions.fcc.gov, you should type all of the characters exactly as they are printed. Minimum Hardware and Software Requirements "! able for downloading at http://java.sun.com/products/archive/j2se/1.3.1_08/index.html (choose the JRE version). Accessing the FCC Mock Auction To access the Mock Auction, point your browser to http://auctions.fcc.gov. Alternatively, you may point your browser to http://auctions2.fcc.gov. On the screen that appears, click the Bidding & Results Systems link. On the Bidding & Results page, click the Mock Auction 59 link. Note: As a contingency, you can either call to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1057A5_Erratum.doc
  • or areas of a screen (e.g., Location field, Selected Licenses area of a screen). bold italic Represents characters that you must type exactly as they appear in the instructions. For example, if you are instructed to type http://auctions.fcc.gov, you should type all of the characters exactly as they are printed. Minimum Hardware and Software Requirements "! able for downloading at http://java.sun.com/products/archive/j2se/1.3.1_08/index.html (choose the JRE version). Accessing the FCC Mock Auction To access the Mock Auction, point your browser to http://auctions.fcc.gov. Alternatively, you may point your browser to http://auctions2.fcc.gov. On the screen that appears, click the Bidding & Results Systems link. On the Bidding & Results page, click the Mock Auction 59 link. Note: As a contingency, you can either call to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1057A6.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1057A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1057A6.txt
  • posted during round two and was the seventh announcement for the auction. Minimum Hardware and Software Requirements The following hardware and software, at a minimum, are required to use the FCC Auctions Bidding System: CPU: Pentium 133 or above RAM: 32 MB (64 MB recommended) Monitor: VGA or above Mouse or other pointing device "! higher, with Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1_08. Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1_08 is available for downloading at http://java.sun.com/products/archive/j2se/1.3.1_08/index.html (choose the JRE version). Round Results File Formats This section describes the formats for the round results files that will be posted on the FCC Internet site after each round of the auction. There are three sets of results files. The first set of files is in Microsoft Access 97
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1057A6_Erratum.doc
  • posted during round two and was the seventh announcement for the auction. Minimum Hardware and Software Requirements The following hardware and software, at a minimum, are required to use the FCC Auctions Bidding System: CPU: Pentium 133 or above RAM: 32 MB (64 MB recommended) Monitor: VGA or above Mouse or other pointing device "! higher, with Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1_08. Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1_08 is available for downloading at http://java.sun.com/products/archive/j2se/1.3.1_08/index.html (choose the JRE version). Round Results File Formats This section describes the formats for the round results files that will be posted on the FCC Internet site after each round of the auction. There are three sets of results files. The first set of files is in Microsoft Access 97
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1062A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1062A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1062A1.txt
  • a detrimental impact on an applicant does not create special circumstances or suggest particular facts that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. In keeping with our prior decisions, we determine that the Petitioners here have not demonstrated the special circumstances necessary for a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed by Carrizozo Municipal Schools, Carrizozo, New Mexico, on November 22, 2004; Florence Unified School District #1, Florence, Arizona, on May 14, 2004; Glen Carbon Centennial Library, Glen Carbon, Illinois, on August 26, 2004; Glenn County Office of Education, Willows, California,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1063A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1063A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1063A1.txt
  • have a detrimental impact on an applicant does not create special circumstances or suggest particular facts that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. In keeping with our prior decisions, we determine that Cold Spring has not demonstrated the special circumstances necessary for a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed by Cold Spring School District 750, Cold Spring, Texas, on November 22, 2004, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Kurt Langer, Cold Spring School District 750, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1064A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1064A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1064A1.txt
  • a detrimental impact on an applicant does not create special circumstances or suggest particular facts that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. In keeping with our prior decisions, we determine that the Petitioners here have not demonstrated the special circumstances necessary for a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed by Concord School District, Concord, New Hampshire, on April 16, 2003; Floyd County Board of Education, Prestonsburg, Kentucky, on August 26, 2003; Fordland R-III School District, Fordland, Missouri, on February 23, 2004; Hull Christian School, Hull, Iowa, on April 14,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1065A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1065A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1065A1.txt
  • rules and procedures, including filing deadlines. Hence, staffing problems do not relieve applicants of their responsibility to comply with the Commission's rules and procedures. In keeping with our prior decisions, we determine that Corpus Christi has not demonstrated the special circumstances necessary for a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Waiver filed by Corpus Christi Church and School, New York, New York, on March 2, 2005, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Brother Larry Lavallee, Corpus Christi Church and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1068A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1068A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1068A1.txt
  • the Request for Waiver of the FCC Form 471 filing window deadline, there will be no need for Greenport Public Schools to file FCC Form 486 for Funding Year 2002. Therefore, we dismiss the Request for Waiver of the filing deadline for the FCC Form 486 as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed by Greenport Public Schools, Greenport, New York, on October 29, 2003, IS DENIED in part and DISMISSED as moot in part. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Charles Kozora,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1069A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1069A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1069A1.txt
  • of non-recurring services for Funding Year 2003 of the schools and libraries universal service support program. Upon review of the record, we find that SLD has approved Orleans Parish's request for an extension of the non-recurring services deadline. Accordingly, we dismiss Orleans Parish's Request for Waiver as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed by Orleans Parish School District, New Orleans, Louisiana, on October 12, 2004, IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau The Request for Waiver was referred to the Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1070A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1070A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1070A1.txt
  • may have a detrimental impact on an applicant does not create special circumstances or suggest particular facts that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. In keeping with our prior decisions, we determine that Owensboro has not demonstrated the special circumstances necessary for a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Owensboro Public Schools, Owensboro, Kentucky, on June 11, 2003, IS DENIED and the request to waive the filing deadline for filing a FCC Form 471 application IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1071A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1071A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1071A1.txt
  • no explanation for why they should be excused from observing the appeals deadline when hundreds of other applicants were able to appeal on time. In keeping with our prior decisions, we determine here that Petitioners have not demonstrated the special circumstances necessary for a waiver of our rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Joint Petition for Waiver and Relief, filed by Pennsylvania Department of Education and South Dakota Department of Education, on January 24, 2005, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Joint Petition of Pennsylvania Department
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1074A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1074A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1074A1.txt
  • year, it is administratively necessary to place on the applicant the responsibility of complying with all relevant rules and procedures, including filing deadlines. In keeping with our prior decisions, we determine that Worth School District has not demonstrated the special circumstances necessary for a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Waiver filed by Worth School District 127, Worth, Illinois, on February 24, 2005, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Nancy Miller, Worth School District 127, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1079A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1079A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1079A1.txt
  • application on January 19, 2000, and that it took steps to inform SLD that it was unable to complete its application on January 19, 2000 due to problems with SLD's Internet site. We therefore grant Gainesville's Request for Waiver and remand its application to SLD for further processing. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed by Gainesville Independent School District, Gainesville, Texas, on June 30, 2000, IS GRANTED and REMANDED to SLD for further processing in accordance with this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1080A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1080A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1080A1.txt
  • job properly, inclement weather, or misunderstanding of the rules does not relieve applicants of their responsibility to comply with the Commission's rules and procedures. In keeping with our prior decisions, we determine that Galloway Township has not demonstrated the special circumstances necessary for a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed by Galloway Township Board of Education, Galloway Township, New Jersey, on June 7, 2004, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Gil Chapman, Galloway Township Board of Education,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1097A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1097A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1097A1.txt
  • status. Accordingly, we find that Hills' requested waiver of section 69.605(c) of the Commission rules is in the public interest and should be granted. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that the petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze as codified in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Sioux Valley Telephone Company and Hills Telephone Company, Inc. on April 6, 2004, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1098A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1098A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1098A1.txt
  • not to be granted routinely. ViaSat does not address the Commission's policy on this issue. Therefore, we find that ViaSat does not provide an adequate basis for making an exception to the Commission's policy. Instead of addressing the Commission's policy regarding motions for extension of time to file pleadings, ViaSat seeks a waiver of the comment-filing deadline pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules. ViaSat has not provided "good cause" for a waiver as required by Section 1.3. For example, ViaSat states that the transaction proposed in the assignment applications before us raise "complex cross-ownership issues," and that it took ViaSat time to identify those issues. However, all the information regarding the ownership of the parties involved in this transaction
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1124A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1124A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1124A1.txt
  • Hence, neither staffing changes nor misunderstanding of the rules relieves applicants of their responsibility to comply with the Commission's rules and procedures. In keeping with our prior decisions, we determine that Information Transport has not demonstrated the special circumstances necessary for a waiver of the Commission's rules. 3. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review by Information Transport Solutions, Inc., Wetumpka, Alabama, dated November 5, 2004, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Tomi J. Selby, Information Transport Solutions, Inc., to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1139A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1139A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1139A1.txt
  • that the requested waiver be granted. This Order therefore grants Geemarc's waiver request. As a result, Geemarc may proceed with either TCB certification or Self-Declaration of Conformity pursuant to Part 68 of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.141 and 0.361 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the request for waiver of section 68.317(f) for Model CL1100, filed by Geemarc Telecom International Ltd., IS GRANTED to the extent stated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: (1) the volume reset override switch shall be labeled as such and located
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1140A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1140A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1140A1.txt
  • that the requested waiver be granted. This Order therefore grants Clarity's waiver request. As a result, Clarity may proceed with either TCB certification or Self-Declaration of Conformity pursuant to Part 68 of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.141 and 0.361 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the request for waiver of section 68.317(f) for Model C4205, filed by Clarity, A Division of Plantronics, Inc., IS GRANTED to the extent stated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: (1) the volume reset override switch shall be labeled as such
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1141A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1141A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1141A1.txt
  • that the requested waiver be granted. This Order therefore grants Clarity's waiver request. As a result, Clarity may proceed with either TCB certification or Self-Declaration of Conformity pursuant to Part 68 of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.141 and 0.361 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the request for waiver of section 68.317(f) for Model C430, filed by Clarity, A Division of Plantronics, Inc., IS GRANTED to the extent stated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: (1) the volume reset override switch shall be labeled as such
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1142A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1142A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1142A1.txt
  • that the requested waiver be granted. This Order therefore grants Geemarc's waiver request. As a result, Geemarc may proceed with either TCB certification or Self-Declaration of Conformity pursuant to Part 68 of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.141 and 0.361 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the request for waiver of section 68.317(f) for Model CL600, filed by Geemarc Telecom International Ltd., IS GRANTED to the extent stated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: (1) the volume reset override switch shall be labeled as such and located
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-114A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-114A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-114A1.txt
  • and 101.115 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 101.103, 101.115, to permit the use of 0.61 meter (two-feet) antennas as an optional alternative to the 1.22 meter (four-feet) antennas presently required for use in the Fixed Microwave Service in the 10.7 - 11.7 GHz (11 GHz) band. See 47 C.F.R. 101.115(b). FiberTower filed the waiver request, pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, on October 22, 2004 seeking immediate relief pending Commission action on a petition for rulemaking that it filed on July 14, 2004 to amend the Commission's Rules that currently require the use of antennas at least 1.22 meters in diameter in the 11 GHz band. FiberTower contends that a grant of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1154A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1154A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1154A1.txt
  • Due: 30 days after Federal Register publication of this Notice Reply Comments Due: 45 days after Federal Register publication of this Notice Interested parties are invited to refresh the record on issues raised in the Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in the above docket related to carrier identification code (CIC) conservation and the definition of ``entity'' as found in Section 1.3 of the CIC Assignment Guidelines. Specifically, we invite interested parties, in light of any changed circumstances, to respond to questions in the CIC Further Notice regarding the two CIC per entity limit, and proposed changes to the definition of the term ``entity.'' Parties submitting comments in response to this Public Notice must file initial comments no later than 30 days
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1267A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1267A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1267A2.txt
  • valuations, modeled as the product of the market size and a valuation ``per pop'' that is now the product of three elements: a bidder-specific private value Uij times the common value sj, and a scale component, fi(ni) that is a function of the number of licenses bidder i acquires, which affects the profitability of the overall operation. Comparing (1.1) and (1.3) shows that a package consisting of only a single license has a scale component fi(1) = 0. There are complementarities when fi(ni) is positive. This kind of function could be specified parametrically, e.g. a quadratic form where convexity for some bidders would provide strong incentives for those bidders to bid on packages, budget constraints permitting. In any case, the function
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1282A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1282A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1282A1.txt
  • 25, 2005) (denying Mr. Flippin's request for extensions of time to file a short-form application and to make an upfront payment for Auction No. 58, as well as for a 180-day postponement of that auction). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(2). 47 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(3). Additionally, the Commission may grant a waiver upon a showing of good cause. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. 47 U.S.C. � 309(j)(3)(A); Motions for Stay of Auction No. 57 and Requests for Dismissal or Disqualification, Order, 19 FCC Rcd 20,482, 20,489 � 20 (ASAD-WTB 2004). . ``Multiple Address Systems Spectrum Auction Scheduled for April 26, 2005; Comment Sought on Reserve Prices or Minimum Opening Bids and Other Auction Procedures,'' Public Notice, 19 FCC Rcd 22449 (2004). Auction No.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1292A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1292A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1292A1.txt
  • 11. See also supra note 6. See, e.g., Metromedia, Inc., 98 F.C.C.2d 300, 305 (1984). See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3555, Note 2(i); Attribution Review Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 12578-91, recon. granted in part, 16 FCC Rcd 1097 (2001) (clarifying EDP rule at 1098-1115). WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (the Commission may waive its rules for ``good cause''). Accordingly, we also reject the suggestion (see supra note 8) that the 6-station combination in the Altoona Metro already exists and is grandfathered pursuant to the ownership provisions adopted by the Commission in 2002 Biennial Regulatory Review, Report and Order and Notice of Proposed Rule Making, 18 FCC Rcd 13620, 13807-09
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1335A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1335A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1335A1.txt
  • the limited waiver of section 61.42(g) to exclude advanced services under Tariff FCC No. 20 from price caps only for purposes of the 2005 annual access tariff filing. ordering clauses IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 204(a), and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, section 61.42(g) of the Commission's rules IS WAIVED for advanced services in Tariff FCC No. 20, including those transferred from VADI to Verizon, only with respect to Verizon's 2005 annual access tariff filing requirements under section 61.43 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 61.42(g), 61.43. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1352A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1352A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1352A1.txt
  • that the requested waiver be granted. This Order therefore grants Clarity's waiver request. As a result, Clarity may proceed with either TCB certification or Self-Declaration of Conformity pursuant to Part 68 of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.141 and 0.361 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the request for waiver of section 68.317(f) for Model C420, filed by Clarity, A Division of Plantronics, Inc., IS GRANTED to the extent stated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: (1) the volume reset override switch shall be labeled as such
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1353A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1353A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1353A1.txt
  • that the requested waiver be granted. This Order therefore grants Clarity's waiver request. As a result, Clarity may proceed with either TCB certification or Self-Declaration of Conformity pursuant to Part 68 of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.141 and 0.361 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the request for waiver of section 68.317(f) for Model C4210, filed by Clarity, A Division of Plantronics, Inc., IS GRANTED to the extent stated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: (1) the volume reset override switch shall be labeled as such
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1355A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1355A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1355A1.txt
  • participate in NECA pools and tariffs and to receive any high-cost universal service support that it may be eligible to receive. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze as codified in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Sandwich Isles Communications, Inc. on December 27, 2004, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1363A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1363A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1363A1.txt
  • Act of 1991 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CG Docket No. 04-53 CG Docket No. 02-278 ORDER Adopted: May 17, 2005 Released: May 18, 2005 By the Acting Chief, Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau: On March 6, 2005, the Direct Marketing Association (DMA) and the E-Mail Service Provider Coalition (ESPC) filed a Joint Petition pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules seeking a waiver, for a period of 90 days, of our recent rules prohibiting the sending of mobile service commercial messages (MSCMs) without the recipient's express prior authorization. These rules were promulgated pursuant to the Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act of 2003, or the CAN-SPAM Act. Alternatively, the Joint Petition seeks a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1387A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1387A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1387A1.txt
  • In this connection, we note that, pursuant to section 95.833(c) of the Commission's rules, ITV will not be eligible to apply for 218-219 MHz service licenses for three years from the date the Commission takes final action affirming that its 218-219 MHz service license has been canceled. 47 C.F.R. � 95.833(c). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.925. Alternatively, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, the Commission has authority to waive its rules if there is ``good cause'' to do so. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990). Mr. Buddy C. Stanley May 31, 2005 Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 � � � h2 h2 ��5���U��x �ۥ # ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-140A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-140A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-140A1.txt
  • will not send a copy of the Declaratory Ruling pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A) because the adopted rules are rules of particular applicability. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in Section 225 of the Communications Act, of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 225, and sections 0.141, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, 1.3, this Declaratory Ruling is hereby ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Hands On's Petition for Declaratory Ruling IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any TRS provider offering any kind of financial incentives or rewards, including arrangements tying the receipt of equipment to minimum TRS usage, SHALL, effective March 1,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1492A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1492A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1492A1.txt
  • as one to maintain the MSV satellite within �0.1� of its assigned orbital longitude, as assessed at the nodal point of the orbit. MSV Application File No. SAT-AMD-20040209-00014 at 17. MSV Application File No. SAT-AMD-20040209-00014 at 17. DIRECTV comments at 2. Joint Opposition at 1. Joint Opposition at 2. Joint Opposition at 2. MSV Reply at 4. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (WAIT Radio); Northeast Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). See Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. See WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1157. The inclination of an orbit is the angle between the orbital plane and the Earth's equatorial plane, measured
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1492A1_Erratum.doc
  • as one to maintain the MSV satellite within �0.1� of its assigned orbital longitude, as assessed at the nodal point of the orbit. MSV Application File No. SAT-AMD-20040209-00014 at 17. MSV Application File No. SAT-AMD-20040209-00014 at 17. DIRECTV comments at 2. Joint Opposition at 1. Joint Opposition at 2. Joint Opposition at 2. MSV Reply at 4. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (WAIT Radio); Northeast Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). See Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. See WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1157. The inclination of an orbit is the angle between the orbital plane and the Earth's equatorial plane, measured
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-14A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-14A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-14A1.txt
  • grant WCA's motion and extend the page limits applicable to petitions for reconsideration of the Commission's R&O to 50 pages. This extension applies to all parties filing petitions for reconsideration of the R&O. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � � 154(i) and 303(r), and Sections 1.3 and 1.429 of the Commission's Rules, 47 CFR � � 1.3 and 1.429, that the Motion to Extend Page Limit filed by the Wireless Communications Association International, Inc. on December 30, 2004 is GRANTED and the limit applicable to all parties filing petitions for reconsideration of the Commission's Report and Order IS HEREBY EXTENDED to 50 pages. These actions are
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1581A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1581A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1581A1.txt
  • using the network names MEX-TVD1 and MEX-TVD2, that is identical to the original request as published by the ITU in December 1999. See Letter from Pantelis Michalopoulos, Counsel for EchoStar, to Thomas S. Tycz, Chief, Satellite Division, dated May 13, 2005, at Attachment 3. See File No. SAT-MOD-20050513-00103, at 5. 47 U.S.C. � 309; 47 C.F.R. � 25.120. Concession at 1.3. Framework Agreement at Article 1(f); Definitive Agreement at 1.B(1). Letter from Pantelis Michalopoulos, Counsel for EchoStar, to Thomas S. Tycz, Chief, Satellite Division, dated May 13, 2005, at Attachment 2. Letter from Pantelis Michalopoulos, Counsel for EchoStar, to Thomas S. Tycz, Chief, Satellite Division, dated May 24, 2005. DIRECTV, Inc., Order and Authorization, 19 FCC Rcd 11055 (2004). See also
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1581A1_Erratum.doc
  • using the network names MEX-TVD1 and MEX-TVD2, that is identical to the original request as published by the ITU in December 1999. See Letter from Pantelis Michalopoulos, Counsel for EchoStar, to Thomas S. Tycz, Chief, Satellite Division, dated May 13, 2005, at Attachment 3. See File No. SAT-MOD-20050513-00103, at 5. 47 U.S.C. � 309; 47 C.F.R. � 25.120. Concession at 1.3. Framework Agreement at Article 1(f); Definitive Agreement at 1.B(1). Letter from Pantelis Michalopoulos, Counsel for EchoStar, to Thomas S. Tycz, Chief, Satellite Division, dated May 13, 2005, at Attachment 2. Letter from Pantelis Michalopoulos, Counsel for EchoStar, to Thomas S. Tycz, Chief, Satellite Division, dated May 24, 2005. DIRECTV, Inc., Order and Authorization, 19 FCC Rcd 11055 (2004). See also
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1602A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1602A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1602A1.txt
  • for a waiver are encouraged to do so quickly so that the Commission may act on their petitions in a timely fashion prior to the June 22 implementation date. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1, 4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 254, and section 1.3 of the Commission rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, that CPUC's petition for waiver of the deadline for state implementation of Lifeline/Link-Up certification and verification procedures set out in the Lifeline Order and an extension until March 1, 2006, IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1607A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1607A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1607A1.txt
  • the 2005 annual filing will not affect SBC's rates for the TIPToP service or the rates it charges for other services that are subject to price caps. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 204(a), and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, section 61.42(g) of the Commission's rules IS WAIVED for TIPToP services offered by SBC, with respect to SBC's 2005 annual access tariff filing requirements under section 61.43 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 61.42(g), 61.43. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tamara L. Preiss Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1710A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1710A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1710A1.txt
  • alleged minimal impact on competition. See Waiver Request at 8. Supplement at 2-3. See Waiver Request, Attachment 3. Id. See Ownership Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 13732-33. See id. WAIT Radio v. F.C.C., 418 F.2d 1153, 1157(1969) (``WAIT Radio'') (cited in Ownership Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 13647). 418 F.2d 1153, 1157-59 (D.C. Cir. 1969)). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (stating that rule provisions may be waived "for good cause shown"). The Commission declined to adopt any specific waiver criteria relating to radio station ownership in the Ownership Order, but stated that ``[p]arties who believe that the particular facts of their case warrant a waiver of the local radio ownership rule may seek a waiver under the general `good cause'
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-173A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-173A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-173A1.txt
  • Waiver or Extension of Down Payment Deadline of December 29th, 2004, and 3) Modification of Auction Date to Be Postponed for 180 Days; and Memorandum in Support Thereof by Pro Se bidder, Ameer Flippin (filed Jan. 3, 2005). 47 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(2). Id. � 1.925(b)(3). Additionally, the Commission may grant a waiver upon a showing of good cause. Id. � 1.3. 47 U.S.C. � 309(j)(3)(A); Motions for Stay of Auction No. 57 and Requests for Dismissal or Disqualification, Order, 19 FCC Rcd 20,482, 20,489 � 20 (ASAD-WTB 2004). See ``Auction of Broadband PCS Spectrum; Status of FCC Form 175 Applications to Participate in Auction No. 58,'' Public Notice, DA 04-3918, at 1, Att. B (WTB Dec. 16, 2004); http://auctions.fcc.gov/. ``Broadband PCS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1742A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1742A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1742A1.txt
  • and indicated that it would provide the measured antenna pattern over the proposed range of frequencies as required under 47 C.F.R � 25.138(d) as the test is completed. The Commission granted DirecTV the STA requests to conduct antenna performance measurements. 47 C.F.R � 25.138(d) specifies that the measurements are to be taken in a calibrated antenna range. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (WAIT Radio); Northeast Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). See Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1159. See also Onsat Petition for Waiver to Permit Routine Licensing of 3.7 Meter Transmit and Receive Stations at C-Band,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1768A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1768A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1768A1.txt
  • and offer wide-area roaming capabilities. The Commonwealth requests waivers of Sections 22.7, 20.9, and 22.565 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 22.7, 20.9, and 22.565, and any other Commission rules that are necessary to grant its application, pursuant to Section 337(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the Act), 47 U.S.C. � 337(c), and Sections 1.925 and 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.925, 1.3. Section 22.7 of the Commission's Rules limits the eligibility for Part 22 authorizations to ``common carriers.'' Section 20.9 specifies that Part 22 Paging and Radiotelephone operations shall be treated as commercial mobile radio services, which conflicts with the Commonwealth's proposed use of the channels for internal communications. Section 22.565 establishes the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-176A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-176A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-176A1.txt
  • WCA's motion and extend the page limits applicable to replies to oppositions to petitions for reconsideration of the Commission's R&O to 20 pages. These extensions apply to all parties filing oppositions and replies. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � � 154(i) and 303(r), and Sections 1.3 and 1.429 of the Commission's Rules, 47 CFR � � 1.3 and 1.429, that the Motion to Extend Page Limits filed by the Wireless Communications Association International, Inc. on January 24, 2005 is GRANTED and the limit applicable to all parties filing oppositions to petitions for reconsideration and replies to oppositions to petitions for reconsideration of the Commission's Report and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1771A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1771A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1771A1.txt
  • of Part 95 of the Commission's Rules to Provide Regulatory Flexibility in the 218-219 MHz Service, WT Docket No. 98-169, RM-8951, Report and Order and Memorandum Opinion and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 1497 (1999). See Amerilink Petition for Waiver and Extension at 8. See id. at 6. See id. at 12. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.925. Alternatively, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, the Commission has authority to waive its rules if there is ``good cause'' to do so. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990). 47 C.F.R. � 1.946(e)(1). See Amerilink Petition for Waiver and Extension at 11. See also San Francisco IVDS, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-180A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-180A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-180A1.txt
  • C.F.R. � 25.111(b). 47 C.F.R. � 25.210(j). XM Radio Modification Application, Appendix A at 19-20. We construe this request as one to maintain the spacecraft within 0.1� of their assigned orbital longitude, as assessed at the nodal point of the orbit. XM Radio Modification Application, Appendix A at 20. XM Radio Modification Application, Appendix A at 20. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (WAIT Radio); Northeast Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). See Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. See WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1157. See Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC, Order and Authorization, DA 05-50 (Int'l Bur. rel. Jan. 10, 2005) (denying
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1812A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1812A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1812A1.txt
  • 2004) (holding that a waiver of Section 2.106 is not required for similar reasons). Although we have considered the International Table of Frequency Allocations in our decision-making here, that table is included in the Code of Federal Regulations for informational purposes only, see 47 C.F.R. � 2.104(a), and, therefore, no waiver of the International Table is required. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (WAIT Radio); Northeast Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). See Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. See WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1157. Fugro-Chance, Inc., Order and Authorization, 10 FCC Rcd 2860, 2860 � 2 (Int'l Bur. 1995) (authorizing non-conforming MSS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1845A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1845A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1845A1.txt
  • Association in San Jose, California (``Association'') asking the Commission to waive the enforcement of Section 1.4000 of the Commission's Over-the-Air Reception Devices rules (47 C.F.R. � 1.4000), and allow the Association to require condominium owners to install their satellite dish antennas on the roof, which is a common area, and not within their individual exclusive use areas. (47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 1.4000(d)). Parties may file responses to the Petition on or before July 29, 2005 and replies on or before August 15, 2005. One copy of each pleading must be served on all parties. Please place the case identifier, CSR-6890-O, on all filings. One copy of responses, replies, or other communications must be served on all participants, and an original
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1910A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1910A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1910A1.txt
  • enabled satellite operators to place their space stations two degrees apart, the Commission was able to accommodate more geostationary satellites. See Amendment of the Commission's Space Station Licensing Rules and Policies, First Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 10760, para 300 (2003). Loral Application at Exhibit B. 47 C.F.R. � 25.210(a)(3). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See Mabuhay Philippines Satellite Corp. Petition for Declaratory Ruling, Application of Loral CyberStar, Inc. for Authority to Operate Two Transmit/Receive Earth Stations at Kapolei, Hawaii, for Use in Conjunction with the Mabuhay Satellite Located at 146� E.L., Order and Authorization, 15 FCC Rcd 23671, 23676 para. 13 (2000) (``Mabuhay Order''). In the Mabuhay Order, the Commission granted a waiver of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1918A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1918A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1918A1.txt
  • Auction No. 81. You ask the Federal Communications Commission (``Commission'') to accept Glorious's FRN, even though you failed to submit it by the March 18, 2005 deadline. You claim that various personal problems encountered by you, as Glorious's General Manager, prevented timely submission of Glorious's FRN. For the reasons set forth below, we deny your waiver request. Pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, the Commission may waive this deadline "for good cause shown" by Glorious, the petitioner. Our grant of a waiver is appropriate only if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, and if such deviation will serve the public interest. For this reason, an entity seeking waiver must plead with particularity the facts and circumstances
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1920A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1920A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1920A1.txt
  • that the requested waiver be granted. This Order therefore grants Clarity's waiver request. As a result, Clarity may proceed with either TCB certification or Self-Declaration of Conformity pursuant to Part 68 of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.141 and 0.361 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the request for waiver of section 68.317(f) for Models W425 and C410, filed by Clarity, A Division of Plantronics, Inc., IS GRANTED to the extent stated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: (1) the volume reset override switch shall be labeled
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1921A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1921A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1921A1.txt
  • that the requested waiver be granted. This Order therefore grants Geemarc's waiver request. As a result, Geemarc may proceed with either TCB certification or Self-Declaration of Conformity pursuant to Part 68 of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.141 and 0.361 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the request for waiver of section 68.317(f) for Model CS-A50 (main unit) and CS-A50E (extra handset), filed by Geemarc Telecom International Ltd., IS GRANTED to the extent stated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: (1) the volume reset override switch shall
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1934A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1934A1.txt
  • and offer wide-area roaming capabilities. The Commonwealth requests waivers of Sections 22.7, 20.9, and 22.565 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 22.7, 20.9, and 22.565, and any other Commission rules that are necessary to grant its application, pursuant to Section 337(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the Act), 47 U.S.C. � 337(c), and Sections 1.925 and 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.925, 1.3. Section 22.7 of the Commission's Rules limits the eligibility for Part 22 authorizations to ``common carriers.'' Section 20.9 specifies that Part 22 Paging and Radiotelephone operations shall be treated as commercial mobile radio services, which conflicts with the Commonwealth's proposed use of the channels for internal communications. Section 22.565 establishes the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1940A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1940A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1940A1.txt
  • trade concerns are included in the public interest analysis. Nothing in the record before us raises any such concerns. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.2 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.2, that the petition for clarification filed by Space Imaging LLC on September 12, 2003, IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that Space Imaging LLC IS GRANTED a waiver of Sections 25.156 and 25.157 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 25.156, 25.157, to the extent necessary to enable the Bureau to consider its EESS application on a first-come, first-served basis as set forth in Section 25.158 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1941A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1941A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1941A1.txt
  • U.S.C. � 307(b). Petition for Reconsideration at 5. See WWIZ, Inc., 37 FCC 685, 686 (1964), aff'd sub nom., The Lorain Journal Co. v. FCC, 351 F.2d 824 (D.C. Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 967 (1966). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.106. See WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157-59 (D.C. Cir. 1969). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (rule provisions may be waived ``for good cause shown''); 47 C.F.R. � 73.3566(a) (requests for waiver ``shall show the nature of the waiver or exception desired and shall set forth reasons in support thereof''). Rio Grande Family Radio Fellowship, Inc. v. FCC, 406 F.2d 664, 665-66 (D.C. Cir. 1968). Technical Streamlining Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 21670. Id. (emphasis added).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1951A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1951A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1951A1.txt
  • DA 05-173 (rel. Jan. 25, 2005) (denying Flippin requests for extensions of time to file a short-form application and to make an upfront payment for Auction No. 58, as well as for a 180-day postponement of the auction). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(3). Additionally, the Commission may grant a waiver upon a showing of good cause. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. You make only general and unsupported assertions that have no apparent relation to the grant of other applicants' applications, see Motion and Petition at 4, and which fall far short of the statutory requirement that petitions to deny be based on factual particulars supported by an affidavit of person(s) with personal knowledge. See n.10, supra. See 47 U.S.C. � 309(j)(3).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2066A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2066A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2066A1.txt
  • more or longer TRS calls, will be ineligible for compensation from the Interstate TRS Fund. This Order shall be effective 120 days after publication in the Federal Register. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in Section 225 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 225, and sections 0.141, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, 1.3, this Order is hereby ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any TRS provider offering to TRS consumers financial incentives relating to free or discount long distance service, as set forth above, SHALL BE ineligible for compensation from the Interstate TRS Fund. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order SHALL BE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2179A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2179A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2179A1.txt
  • Virginia schools will have the ability to obtain services from state master contracts as well as the opportunity to receive support under the schools and libraries support mechanism, provided all other E-rate application requirements are satisfied. We therefore grant the instant request for waiver. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the Waiver Petition filed by the West Virginia Department of Education, on February 25, 2005, IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Request of West Virginia Department of Education for Waiver of Form 471 Line 30, Commission's Rule
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2262A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2262A1.txt
  • of the Telecommunications Act of 1996- Video Programming Accessibility,13 FCC Rcd 19974, 20015-16 (1998)(``Order on Reconsideration''). Id. at 4. Id. Id. at 4-7. Id. at 5. Id. at 7. Id. at 9. See Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 3311. Petition at 10. Wait Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (the Commission may waive its rules for ``good cause''). See Implementation of Video Description of Video Programming, Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 15230, 15255 (2000). 47 C.F.R. � 0.283. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 05-2262 Federal Communications Commission DA 05-2262 � �@��� ; < = � F t x J c �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2268A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2268A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2268A1.txt
  • telecommunications plant and expenses and develop separations factors in accordance with the separations procedures in effect as of December 31, 2000. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of sections 69.2(hh) and 69.601 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 69.2(hh), 69.601, filed by Allband Communications Cooperative on April 7, 2005, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202, and 254 of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2269A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2269A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2269A1.txt
  • telecommunications plant and expenses and develop separations factors in accordance with the separations procedures in effect as of December 31, 2000. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petitions for waiver of sections 69.2(hh) and 69.601 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 69.2(hh), 69.601, filed by Westgate Communications LLC d/b/a WeavTel on August 18, 2004 and by Beaver Creek Telephone Company on December 8, 2004 ARE GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2270A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2270A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2270A1.txt
  • area of principal community contour overlap are not counted as being in the relevant radio market. Ownership Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 13729-30. As discussed infra p. 6, two other markets are formed over land. Waiver Request, Technical Exhibit at 3. 47 C.F.R. � 73.3555(a)(1)(iii). 418 F. 2d 1153, 1157-59 (D.C. Cir. 1969)). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (stating that rule provisions may be waived "for good cause shown") and 47 C.F.R. � 73.3566(a) (providing that requests for waiver "shall show the nature of the waiver or exception desired and shall set forth the reasons in support thereof''). The Commission declined to adopt any specific waiver criteria relating to radio station ownership in the Ownership Report and Order,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2294A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2294A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2294A1.txt
  • follows the procedures for a Supplier's Declaration of Conformity (SDOC). A waiver of Sections 68.316 and 68.317 allows the petitioner to apply to a TCB, or to file its SDOC pursuant to the Part 68 equipment approval requirements, despite the fact that the device does not meet the technical standards of Sections 68.316 and 68.317. Waiver Standard. Pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, the Commission may waive any provision of its rules, in whole or in part, on its own motion or on petition, if good cause is shown. Section 68.5 more specifically provides that the Commission, upon application of any interested person, may waive the requirements for hearing aid compatibility with respect to new telephones, or telephones associated
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2403A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2403A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2403A1.txt
  • Disaster Declaration for the state of Florida on August 28, 2005. We do not extend the relief granted in this public notice to entities operating in the state of Florida, because the telecommunications infrastructure in Florida was not subject to the same level of destruction as was the infrastructure in parts of Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. We grant these extensions pursuant to our delegated authority under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291 See Form 477 Instructions � III.F (Explanations and Comments); Form 477 Part IV (Explanations and Comments), available at http://www.fcc.gov/formpage.html. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2406A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2406A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2406A1.txt
  • recognize that President Bush also issued a Major Disaster Declaration for the state of Florida on August 28, 2005. We do not extend the relief granted in this public notice to entities in the state of Florida, because Florida was apparently not subject to the same level of destruction as were parts of Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Wireless Radio Services. All radio services authorized in Parts 13, 20, 22, 24, 27, 74, 80, 87, 90, 95, 97 and 101 of this chapter, whether commercial or private in nature. 47 C.F.R. � 1.931(a). 47 C.F.R. � 1.915(b). 47 C.F.R. �� 22.307, 90.407, 101.205. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2415A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2415A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2415A1.txt
  • expect that the acquiring carriers will provide the affected customers with the same rates, terms and conditions of service as the customers' originally authorized carrier. In addition, when the originally authorized carriers of the affected customers are once again able to provide service, the carriers that acquired these customers must facilitate the return of customers to their original carriers. Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules authorizes the Commission to suspend, revoke, amend, or waive a Commission rule for good cause shown. Accordingly, we find that, in order to promote the maintenance and rebuilding of communities in hurricane affected areas and to facilitate continued access to telecommunications services for hurricane victims, it is in the public interest to waive the 30-day notice
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2439A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2439A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2439A1.txt
  • Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 153, 154, 201-205, and 251, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 52.19(c)(4) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 52.19(c)(4), the petition filed by the California Public Utility Commission, is GRANTED, IN PART, as discussed herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to the authority contained in Sections 1.3 and 52.19(c) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 52.19(c), and the delegated authority in sections 0.91 and 0.291, of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291 that the California Public Utility Commission is GRANTED a Temporary Waiver of 47 C.F.R. Section 52.19(c)(3)(ii) for a period of one year from the date of implementation of the SO codes.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2444A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2444A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2444A1.txt
  • notice. Because PanAmSat's applications present identical questions of law and facts, we address all three applications in this Order. discussion Pursuant to Section 2.102 of the Commission's rules, the assignment, authorization, and use of frequencies and bands of frequencies between 9 kHz and 275 GHz shall be in accordance with the Table of Frequency Allocations, 47 C.F.R. Section 2.106. Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules authorizes the Commission to waive its rules for ``good cause shown.'' Waiver is appropriate only if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, and such deviation would better serve the public interest than would strict adherence to the general rule. Generally, the Commission may grant a waiver of its rules in a particular case
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2451A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2451A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2451A1.txt
  • to Northwest's existing study area and the discontinued operation of the separate of Noonan study area will serve the public interest. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze as codified in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Northwest Communications Cooperative and Noonan Farmers Telephone Company, on January 3, 2005, IS GRANTED, as described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin Chief, Wireline Competition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2452A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2452A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2452A1.txt
  • IN CERTAIN DESIGNATED MARKET AREAS EFFECTED BY HURRICANE KATRINA Pursuant to Sections 76.64 and 76.66 of the Commission's rules, television broadcast stations seeking cable television or satellite carriage are required to elect between retransmission consent or must carry status by October 1, 2005 in their designated market areas (DMAs). Because of the impact of Hurricane Katrina and pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, the Media Bureau finds good cause to extend this deadline until November 15, 2005 in the following DMAs: Baton Rouge, New Orleans, Mobile-Pensacola, Hattiesburg-Laurel, and Biloxi-Gulfport. For the same reason, those portions of Commission's rules 76.64(f) and 76.66(c),(d) that affect broadcast stations' default carriage status in the absence of an affirmative carriage election by October 1,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2463A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2463A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2463A1.txt
  • inconsistent with the public interest since it was the Commission's intention not to use a carrier's projected collected first quarter 2003 information for billing purposes. Discussion We grant BellSouth LD's request and grant, in part, SouthernLINC's request for waiver of the Commission's universal service true-up procedures for 2003 and conclude that they demonstrated good cause to justify the waiver. Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules provides that waiver of a rule may be granted upon ``good cause shown.'' Commission rules are presumed valid, however, and an applicant for waiver bears a heavy burden. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule ``only if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule and such deviation will serve the public
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2475A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2475A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2475A1.txt
  • been rare, we understand that the storm resulted in the loss of service to as many as 24 BellSouth central offices with many of those still out of service today. Restoration efforts may involve a variety of network rearrangements, the exact nature of which will not be known until all the damage has been completely surveyed and assessed. DISCUSSION Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules authorizes the Commission to suspend, revoke, amend or waive a Commission rule for good cause shown. Here, Hurricane Katrina caused substantial damage to telecommunications network facilities. Restoring full telecommunications service in the areas affected by the hurricane as quickly as possible is a critical component in the overall recovery operation in the Gulf Coast region. Thus,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2481A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2481A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2481A1.txt
  • in the MF and HF bands, administrations shall: 1.1 make assignments in the bands allocated to the fixed and mobile services; 1.2 not make assignments in the bands: - allocated exclusively to the maritime or aeronautical mobile (R) services; - shared on a co-primary basis with the broadcasting service, radiodetermination service or the amateur services; - allocated to radio astronomy; 1.3 avoid use which may affect frequency assignments involving safety services made in accordance with Nos. 5.155, 5.155A and 5.155B; 1.4 take into account any footnotes applicable to the proposed bands and the implications regarding compatibility; 2 that frequency adaptive systems shall automatically limit simultaneous use of frequencies to the minimum necessary for communication requirements; 3 that, with a view to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2484A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2484A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2484A1.txt
  • that would normally be filed within the next 150 days. In order to avoid prejudice to parties that are unable to timely file due to the disruption caused by Hurricane Katrina, we are temporarily waiving our filing deadlines to allow parties in Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama additional time in which to submit the above-listed USF payments, forms and data. Section 1.3 of our rules authorizes the Commission to suspend, revoke, amend, or waive, for good cause shown, a Commission rule. We recognize that carriers and other parties in Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama most affected by Hurricane Katrina should not be denied USF payments due to their inability to meet a filing deadline while attempting to restore service to customers and otherwise
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2521A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2521A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2521A1.txt
  • Commission's rules address operation during periods of emergency for licensees authorized under these rule parts. These rules allow licensees to provide emergency communications during a period of emergency in a manner or configuration not specified in the station authorization or in the rules governing such stations. By the Acting Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau --FCC-- (September 23, 2005). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Wireless Radio Services. All radio services authorized in Parts 13, 20, 22, 24, 27, 74, 80, 87, 90, 95, 97 and 101 of this chapter, whether commercial or private in nature. 47 C.F.R. � 1.931(a). 47 C.F.R. � 1.915(b). 47 C.F.R. �� 22.307, 90.407, 101.205. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2534A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2534A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2534A1.txt
  • IN CERTAIN DESIGNATED MARKET AREAS EFFECTED BY HURRICANE RITA Pursuant to Sections 76.64 and 76.66 of the Commission's rules, television broadcast stations seeking cable television or satellite carriage are required to elect between retransmission consent or must carry status by October 1, 2005 in their designated market areas (DMAs). Because of the impact of Hurricane Rita and pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, the Media Bureau finds good cause to extend this deadline until November 15, 2005 in the Alexandria, Lake Charles, and Lafayette, Louisiana and Beaumont-Port Arthur, Texas designated market areas (DMAs). For the same reason, those portions of Commission rules 76.64(f) and 76.66(c),(d) that affect broadcast stations' default carriage status in the absence of an affirmative carriage
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2543A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2543A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2543A2.txt
  • 31 0 R/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageC/ImageB]>> endobj 21 0 obj<>stream `4���/�{=/&{�Ა<�s�B � ѵš``�� Vf�6�?U�� endstream endobj 22 0 obj<> endobj 23 0 obj<>stream xmlns:pdf='http://ns.adobe.com/pdf/1.3/' pdf:CreationDate--Text='28 Sep 05 16:55'> Euripides endstream endobj 24 0 obj<> endobj xref 0 25 0000000000 65535 f 0000011592 00000 n 0000011718 00000 n 0000011797 00000 n 0000013335 00000 n 0000013461 00000 n 0000013540 00000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2543A3.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2543A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2543A3.txt
  • 0 R/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageC/ImageB]>> endobj 3 0 obj<> endobj 4 0 obj<>stream �< Ⱦԡ�{�-`` -�� 5[M ��T �p�% endstream endobj 5 0 obj<> endobj 6 0 obj<> endobj 7 0 obj<>stream xmlns:pdf='http://ns.adobe.com/pdf/1.3/' pdf:CreationDate--Text='28 Sep 05 16:44'> Euripides endstream endobj 8 0 obj<> endobj xref 0 9 0000000000 65535 f 0000016760 00000 n 0000016885 00000 n 0000016962 00000 n 0000016997 00000 n 0000018562 00000 n 0000018607 00000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2543A4.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2543A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2543A4.txt
  • endobj 15 0 obj<>stream X`���WA{(R)� ��q��]�n��Y# Fe��� M�G �0;�o ɈN� � ���"� o�/�yd )��j U=� R#q�Y׃QL¦ ˉ7 jtmh� ����"��p]����> "Q +�� }@�{=a� �V��~u ="�� endstream endobj 1 0 obj<> endobj 2 0 obj<>stream xmlns:pdf='http://ns.adobe.com/pdf/1.3/' pdf:CreationDate--Text='28 Sep 05 17:06'> Euripides endstream endobj 3 0 obj<> endobj xref 0 4 0000000000 65535 f 0000009171 00000 n 0000009221 00000 n 0000012508 00000 n trailer <> startxref 116 %%EOF
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-260A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-260A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-260A1.txt
  • will conclude that SBC-ASI does not have to comply with the Commission's accounting and reporting requirements. Thus, SBC-ASI argues that it would be completely contrary to the public interest to force it to incur the cost of modifying its records, systems, and processes while these proceedings are pending. SBC-ASI has demonstrated that it meets the waiver requirements prescribed in Sections 1.3 and 32.18 of the Commission's rules. We agree with SBC-ASI that the public interest will be served by avoiding the cost for SBC-ASI to create a new accounting and reporting system that would comply with the Commission's accounting, recordkeeping and reporting requirements pending a decision as to whether SBC-ASI is considered non-dominant. Moreover, since SBC-ASI was excused from filing cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2640A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2640A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2640A1.txt
  • a bond the Commission in the amount of $5,000,000.00 pursuant to the procedures set forth in Public Notice, DA 03-2602, 18 FCC Rcd 16283 (2003), within 30 days of the date of this grant. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, DigitalGlobe Inc.'s request to operate QuickBird-1 in the 8345-8400 MHz band is DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 that DigitalGlobe, Inc. IS GRANTED a waiver of Sections 25.156 and 25.157 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 25.156, 25.157, to the extent necessary to enable the Bureau to consider its EESS application on a first-come, first-served basis as set forth in Section 25.158 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2686A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2686A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2686A1.txt
  • 2. Id. See id. Id. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.2104(g), 1.2107(c). See Implementation of Section 309(j) of the Communications Act, Competitive Bidding, Second Report and Order, 9 FCC Rcd 2348, 2388 � 199 n.152 (1994) (Competitive Bidding Second R&O). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.2107(c); Auction No. 59 Closing PN at 6. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(3). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See Competitive Bidding Second R&O, 9 FCC Rcd at 2382 � 197. See, e.g., Silver Palm Communications, Inc., Order, 17 FCC Rcd 6606 (WTB, Com. Wir. Div. 2002) (Bureau granted waiver when late filing was due to applicant's inadvertence and unawareness of deadline, and licenses would provide rural areas with competitive wireless service); City Page & Cellular Services, Inc., et
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2687A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2687A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2687A1.txt
  • at 1-2. Id. at 2. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.2104(g), 1.2107(c). See Implementation of Section 309(j) of the Communications Act, Competitive Bidding, Second Report and Order, 9 FCC Rcd 2348, 2388 � 199 n.152 (1994) (Competitive Bidding Second R&O). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.2107(c); Auction No. 59 Closing PN at 6. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(3). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See Competitive Bidding Second R&O, 9 FCC Rcd at 2382 � 197. See, e.g., Silver Palm Communications, Inc., Order, 17 FCC Rcd 6606 (WTB, Com. Wir. Div. 2002) (Bureau granted waiver when late filing was due to applicant's inadvertence and unawareness of deadline, and licenses would provide rural areas with competitive wireless service); City Page & Cellular Services, Inc., et
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2688A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2688A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2688A1.txt
  • 1-2. See id. at 2. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.2104(g), 1.2107(c). See Implementation of Section 309(j) of the Communications Act, Competitive Bidding, Second Report and Order, 9 FCC Rcd 2348, 2388 � 199 n.152 (1994) (Competitive Bidding Second R&O). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.2107(c); Auction No. 59 Closing PN at 6. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(3). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See Competitive Bidding Second R&O, 9 FCC Rcd at 2382 � 197. We separately note PSI's representation that, while the company currently holds numerous FCC licenses, and has participated in Auction Nos. 26, 40, 41, 42, 48, 57 and 59, this is PSI's first instance of non-compliance with a Commission auction requirement. See Rasmussen Letter at 2. PSI intends to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2713A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2713A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2713A1.txt
  • extension of the tariff revision deadline. Incumbent LECs must now file revised rates in compliance with the PIC Change Charge Order to be effective no later than January 1, 2006. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1-4, 201, 203, and 205 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154, 201, 203, and 205, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91 and 0.291, that Verizon's and SBC's petitions for waiver of the date for filing tariff revisions related to the requirements of the PIC Change Charge Order ARE GRANTED, to the extent discussed above. Incumbent LECs SHALL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2714A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2714A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2714A1.txt
  • Choice Phone's requests for a waiver and extension of time until February 15, 2006, to comply with the wireless LNP requirements for all porting requests they may receive prior to that date. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i) and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i) and 155(c), sections 1.3 and 52.31(d) of the Commission rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 and 52.31(d), and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.131 and 0.331 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 0.331, the petition for waiver and extension of time to implement wireless-to-wireless porting filed by TeleGuam is GRANTED in part and DISMISSED in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2718A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2718A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2718A1.txt
  • The public is invited to comment on this showing. 5. Consistent with the technical requirements of the Commission's rules, Channel 292A can be allotted to Marlinton, West Virginia, utilizing coordinates of 38-13-24 NL and 80-05-41 WL, and Channel 291A can be allotted to Keswick, Virginia, utilizing coordinates of 38-01-48 NL and 78-22-55 WL, with a site restriction of 2.1 kilometers (1.3 miles) northwest of Keswick. 6. Accordingly, we seek comments on the proposed amendment to the FM Table of Allotments, Section 73.202(b) of the Commission's Rules, with respect to the communities listed below, as follows: Channel Nos. City Present Proposed Churchville, Virginia 292B1 -------- Keswick, Virginia --------- 291A Marlinton, West Virginia ---------- 292A 7. The Commission's authority to institute rule making
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2778A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2778A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2778A1.txt
  • 338-2888 and select option 2. Hours are from 8 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday through Friday (except Federal holidays). To provide quality service and ensure security, all telephone calls are recorded. By the Acting Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau --FCC-- (October 24, 2005). The major disaster declaration provides for federal aid beginning on October 23, 2005. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Wireless Radio Services. All radio services authorized in Parts 13, 20, 22, 24, 27, 74, 80, 87, 90, 95, 97 and 101 of this chapter, whether commercial or private in nature. 47 C.F.R. � 1.931(a). 47 C.F.R. � 1.915(b). 47 C.F.R. �� 22.307, 90.407, 101.205. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1113. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2817A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2817A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2817A1.txt
  • In the event that a situation develops where Texas 11 is unable to support porting due to circumstances beyond its control, it may file a new request for waiver at that time. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i) and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i) and 155(c), sections 1.3 and 52.31 of the Commission rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 and 52.31, and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.131 and 0.331 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 0.331, the petition filed by Texas 11 is DISMISSED without prejudice. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey S. Steinberg Deputy Chief, Spectrum and Competition Policy Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau See Telephone Number
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2819A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2819A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2819A1.txt
  • d/b/a Pacific Telemanagement Services, and Intera Communications Corp., Complainants, v. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-03-MD-011 ) Network IP, LLC, and ) Network Enhanced Telecom, LLP, ) ) Defendants. ) order Adopted: October 26, 2005 Released: October 27, 2005 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Order, pursuant to sections 1.3 and 1.727 of the Commission's rules, we grant in substantial part a motion filed by Complainants (collectively, ``APCC'') for waiver of the six-month filing deadline set forth in section 1.718 of the Commission's rules. For statute of limitations purposes, rule 1.718 allows the filing date of a formal complaint to ``relate back'' to the filing date of a prior informal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2824A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2824A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2824A1.txt
  • the Commission's rules. See http://www.fema.gov/news/newsrelease.fema?id=20006 (October 24, 2005). The affected parts of Florida are the counties of Brevard, Broward, Charlotte, Collier, DeSoto, Glades, Hardee, Hendry, Highlands, Indian River, Lee, Martin, Miami-Dade, Monroe, Okeechobee, Osceola, Palm Beach, Polk, St. Lucie, and Sarasota. More counties may be designated after assessments are fully completed in the affected areas by FEMA. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 # $ � � � � � ��PNG r v ��"r�9 I'6� �d�Y�͆aX ���; Wh� �X,�aX���y�]\\.W`h���va6l! �v"]�V�at�������-``````�"m(c)x<��G�<���={-N��J%t�<== �"""x ҍ� � ��(c)���!��'' �R)&� �A�� "���\��v`` � 6� �� �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2829A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2829A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2829A1.txt
  • areas. Accordingly, we find that waiving section 54.802(a) of the Commission's rules will serve the public interest by preserving and advancing universal service. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.802(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.802(a), filed by Citizens Communications and Frontier Communications IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Citizens Communications and Frontier Communications, Request for Review of a Decision of the Universal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-283A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-283A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-283A1.txt
  • nature of the omission is not a special circumstance warranting a waiver. In light of the thousands of applications that SLD reviews and processes each funding year, administrative necessity requires that each applicant be responsible for providing complete and accurate information and meeting all of the program deadlines. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Esko Public Schools, Esko, Minnesota, on November 20, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Jim Schwartz & Richard Singpiel, Esko Public Schools, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-284A1.txt
  • and complying with program rules and procedures. Hence, staffing changes does not relieve applicants of their responsibility to comply with the Commission's rules and procedures. In keeping with our prior decisions, we determine that ONEC has not demonstrated the special circumstances necessary for a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed August 2, 2004, by ONEC, Manderson, South Dakota, IS DENIED and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-285A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-285A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-285A1.txt
  • application was approved or due to personnel changes do not relieve applicants of their responsibility to understand and comply with the program rules or procedures. In keeping with our prior decisions, we determine that Petitioners have not demonstrated the special circumstances necessary for a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed on March 8, 2004, by School Administrative Unit 41, Hollis, New Hampshire; on April 12, 2004, by River Trails School District 26, Mt. Prospect, Illinois; on May 4, 2004, by Hyde Leadership Public Charter School, Washington, DC; and on June
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2865A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2865A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2865A1.txt
  • licensees and applicants are reminded to follow the procedures outlined in the October 21, 2005 Public Notice regarding guidance when submitting hurricane-related filings via the Universal Licensing System (ULS), including providing the required certification that the licensee or applicant was affected by Hurricane Katrina. By the Acting Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau --FCC-- See http://www.fema.gov/news/disasters.fema (August 31, 2005). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See ``Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Announces Extension of Filing and Regulatory Deadlines for Wireless Licensees in Areas Impacted by Hurricane Katrina,'' Public Notice, DA 05-2406 (WTB rel. Sept. 1, 2005). After November 30, 2005, requests for waiver related to Hurricane Katrina may still be filed; however, these requests will be considered on a case-by-case basis pursuant to the Commission's waiver standards.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3002A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3002A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3002A1.txt
  • 780744. This action should ensure that Shiprock, a school eligible to receive a 90-percent discount, will obtain the funding that USAC already approved for the installation of internal connections. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j) and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-152 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291 and 1.3, that the Request for Waiver filed by Removable Media Solutions, Inc., on behalf of Shiprock Alternative High School, Flagstaff, Arizona, IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda Jones Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Mary Lusi, Removable Media Solutions, Inc., to Federal Communications Commission, filed May
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3009A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3009A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3009A1.txt
  • generally requires all equipment in its central offices to comply with NEBS Level 1 safety standards and that the proposed wireless equipment has not been certified with NEBS. Absent a waiver of section 51.323(c) of the Commission's rules, BellSouth may be unable to deploy the wireless equipment for service restoration purposes and simultaneously fully comply with section 51.323(c). discussion Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules authorizes the Commission to suspend, revoke, amend or waive a Commission rule for good cause shown. Here, the hurricanes caused substantial damage to telecommunications network facilities. Indeed, the Commission has granted a number of waivers and other temporary authorizations to enable carriers to most effectively restore services to the hurricane-affected areas as quickly as possible. Thus,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3024A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3024A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3024A1.txt
  • small LECs would undermine this goal. Thus, we conclude that waiver of Section 54.301 of the Commission's rules is in the public interest. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petitions for waiver of section 54.301 of the Commission's rules, filed by Alliance Communications Cooperative, Inc. and its subsidiary, Hills Telephone Company, Inc., East Ascension Telephone Company, LLC, and Columbus Telephone Company, ARE GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Alliance Communications Cooperative,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-306A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-306A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-306A1.txt
  • Verizon that such a result was inconsistent with the public interest since it was the Commission's intention not to use a carrier's projected collected first quarter 2003 information for billing purposes. Discussion We grant New Edge's request for waiver of the Commission's universal service true-up procedures for 2003 and conclude that it demonstrated good cause to justify the waiver. Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules provides that waiver of a rule may be granted upon ``good cause shown.'' Commission rules are presumed valid, however, and an applicant for waiver bears a heavy burden. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule ``only if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule and such deviation will serve the public
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3095A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3095A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3095A2.txt
  • endobj 12 0 obj<>stream �g ��pvȣ�B ��)� endstream endobj 13 0 obj<> endobj 14 0 obj<> endobj 15 0 obj<> endobj 16 0 obj<>stream xmlns:pdf='http://ns.adobe.com/pdf/1.3/' pdf:Producer='Acrobat Distiller 6.0 (Windows)'> 4 Federal Communications CommissionJSW ANK endstream endobj 17 0 obj<> endobj
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3103A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3103A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3103A1.txt
  • Accordingly, Blue Valley is required to recalculate its jurisdictional separations factors pursuant to the Separations Freeze Order and the Commission's rules. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the joint petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze as codified in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by United Telephone Company of Kansas and Blue Valley Telecommunications, Inc., on January 10, 2005, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3104A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3104A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3104A1.txt
  • Accordingly, Madison River is required to recalculate its jurisdictional separations factors pursuant to the Separations Freeze Order and the Commission's rules. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. ��0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze as codified in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Madison River Telephone Company, LLC, MebTel, Inc. d/b/a MebTel Communications and BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., on January 27, 2005, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3105A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3105A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3105A1.txt
  • that Direct Communications' requested waiver of section 69.605(c) of the Commission rules is in the public interest and should be granted. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, .291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze as codified in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Direct Communications Cedar Valley, LLC and Qwest Corporation on November 2, 2004, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i),
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3106A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3106A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3106A1.txt
  • find that Reasnor's requested waiver of section 69.605(c) of the Commission rules is in the public interest and should be granted. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze as codified in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Sully Telephone Association, Inc. and Reasnor Telephone Company, LLC on December 15, 2004, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3108A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3108A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3108A1.txt
  • filing deadlines. In these instances, these special circumstances outweigh any processing difficulties that USAC may face as a result of the late-filed certification. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.313 of the Commission's rules, filed by Qwest Corporation (Nebraska) on March 23, 2004, IS GRANTED, as described herein. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3111A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3111A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3111A1.txt
  • for filing, we doubt circumstances as described by these petitioners will be considered ``special circumstances'' in the future. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, this Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver of sections 54.307(c), 54.802(a) and 54.809(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 54.307(c), 54.802(a) and 54.809(c), filed by Highland Cellular, Inc., IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3138A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3138A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3138A1.txt
  • Congress and the General Accounting Office pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A), because it concerns rules of particular applicability. Materials in Accessible Formats . ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in Section 225 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 225, and sections 0.141, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, 1.3, this Order is hereby ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that NECA shall compensate providers of inbound two-line captioned telephone service from the Interstate TRS Fund using the allocation factor adopted herein for the period October 14, 2005 through June 30, 2006. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Consumer & Governmental
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3139A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3139A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3139A1.txt
  • cause exists to extend the waiver of the emergency call handling requirement for VRS providers until January 1, 2007. Accordingly, the emergency call handling waiver for VRS will expire on January 1, 2007, or upon the release of an order addressing this issue, whichever comes first. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in Sections 0.141, 0.361, 1.3 of the Commission Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, 1.3, this Order is ADOPTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Monica Desai, Chief Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau Telecommunications relay service enables a person with a hearing or speech disability to access the telephone system to call persons without such a disability. A communications assistant (CA) relays the call back and forth (e.g.,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3181A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3181A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3181A1.txt
  • Verizon's provision of customer notification and certification to the Commission that complies with all requirements of section 64.1120(e), except the 30-day periods waived herein. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.141, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Verizon New York, Inc. and Verizon New England, Inc, on November 23, 2005, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Nancy Stevenson, Deputy Chief Consumer Policy Division Consumer & Governmental Affairs
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3224A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3224A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3224A1.txt
  • via eSupport at eSupport.fcc.gov or by telephone at (877) 480-3201 or (717) 338-2888 and select option 2, ((TTY) (717) 338-2824). Hours are from 8 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday through Friday (except Federal holidays). To provide quality service and ensure security, all telephone calls are recorded. By the Acting Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau --FCC-- >. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See ``Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Announces Extension of Filing and Regulatory Deadlines for Wireless Licensees in Areas Impacted by Hurricane Katrina,'' Public Notice, DA 05-2406 (WTB rel. Sept. 1, 2005) (Hurricane Katrina Extension PN); ``Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Announces Further Extension of Filing and Regulatory Deadlines for Wireless Licensees in Areas Impacted by Hurricane Katrina,'' Public Notice, DA 05-2865 (WTB rel. Oct.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3227A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3227A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3227A1.txt
  • Fifth Report and Order, IB Docket No. 02-34, 19 FCC Rcd 12637 (para.64) (2004) (Space Station Reform First Reconsideration Order). See Trilateral Arrangement Regarding Use of the Geostationary Orbit Reached by Canada, Mexico, and the United States, Public Notice (Sept. 2, 1988) (``1988 Trilateral Arrangement'') (addresses FSS C-band and Ku-band operations at specific GSO orbital locations). Id. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972) (WAIT Radio). Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (Northeast Cellular). WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1159; Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1157. Id. at 1159. See 47 C.F.R. � 25.140; Licensing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-328A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-328A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-328A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of MCI, Inc. IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section 1.718 of our rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3290A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3290A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3290A1.txt
  • C.F.R. � 54.307. 47 U.S.C. � 254(e). Section 214(e) of the Act provides that state commissions shall designate carriers as ETCs. 47 U.S.C. � 214(e). 47 U.S.C. � 254(e). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.307, 54.313, 54.314, 54.802, 54.809, 54.903. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.307. See FiberNet Petition at 1. FiberNet Petition at 2. Id. Id. at 3. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (``Northeast Cellular''). WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969); Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. Tucson Radio, Inc. v. FCC, 452 F.2d 1380, 1382 (D.C. Cir. 1971). Citizens Communications and Frontier Communications Petition for Waiver of Section
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-334A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-334A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-334A1.txt
  • of CNT. Applicants have entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of January 17, 2005 through which (1) Condor will be merged with and into CNT whereupon the separate existence of Condor shall cease and CNT will be the surviving corporation (``Surviving Corporation'') and (2) outstanding shares of CNT will be converted into the right to receive 1.3 shares of McDATA Class A Common Stock plus cash in lieu of fractional shares and the Surviving Corporation will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of McDATA. Upon completion of the proposed transaction, the current McDATA and CNT stockholders will own approximately 76% and 24%, respectively, of McDATA. Furthermore, the Applicants state that no person or entities will directly or indirectly own
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3352A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3352A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3352A1.txt
  • telecommunications plant and expenses and develop separations factors in accordance with the separations procedures in effect as of December 31, 2000. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of sections 36.611 and 36.612 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 36.611 and 36.612, filed by Adak Eagle Enterprises, LLC d/b/a Adak Telephone Utility, on February 9, 2005, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c),
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3354A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3354A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3354A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 05-3354 Released: December 29, 2005 PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR New Valor PETITION FOR Waiver of Section 61.41 of the Commission's Rules WCB/Pricing 05-37 COMMENTS: January 17, 2006 REPLY COMMENTS: January 27, 2006 On December 22, 2005, New Valor filed a petition for waiver pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, requesting that the Commission waive relevant portions of the Commission's ``all-or-nothing'' rule codified in section 61.41 of its rules, 47 C.F.R. 61.41. New Valor will be formed as a result of the merger of Valor Communications Group, Inc. (``Valor''), and the wireline properties of ALLTEL Holding Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary of ALLTEL Corporation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-36A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-36A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-36A1.txt
  • preferred. 5. For all of the foregoing reasons, we conclude that the public interest would be served by substituting Channel 247A for Channel 247C1 at Weatherford, Oklahoma, and realloting Channel 247A at Blanchard, Oklahoma. Channel 247A can be allotted at Blanchard in compliance with the minimum distance separation requirements of the Commission's Rules with a site restriction of 2.1 kilometers (1.3 miles) southwest of Blanchard at reference coordinates of: 35-07-21 NL and 97-40-18 WL. 6. The Commission will send a copy of this Report and Order in a report to be sent to Congress and the General Accounting Office pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. �801(a)(a)(A). 7. Accordingly, pursuant to the authority found in 47 U.S.C. Sections 4(i),
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-430A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-430A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-430A1.txt
  • a detrimental impact on an applicant does not create special circumstances or suggest particular facts that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. In keeping with our prior decisions, we determine that the Petitioners here have not demonstrated the special circumstances necessary for a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Waiver filed by Atlanta Public Schools, Atlanta, Georgia, on May 7, 2003; Kings Local School District, Kings Mills, Ohio, on March 31, 2003; Ross-Hill Academy, Detroit, Michigan, on July 9, 2003; St. Agatha School, Brooklyn, New York, on June 10, 2003; St.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-431A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-431A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-431A1.txt
  • a detrimental impact on an applicant does not create special circumstances or suggest particular facts that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. In keeping with our prior decisions, we determine that the Petitioners here have not demonstrated the special circumstances necessary for a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Waiver filed by El Dorado County Office of Education, Placerville, California, on March 12, 2003; GEMS Academy, Humble, Texas, on July 21, 2003; Lafayette School Corporation, Lafayette, Indiana, on January 20, 2002; and Sts. Leo-Seton Catholic School, Lafayette, Louisiana, on August 26,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-432A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-432A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-432A1.txt
  • a detrimental impact on an applicant does not create special circumstances or suggest particular facts that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. In keeping with our prior decisions, we determine that the Petitioners here have not demonstrated the special circumstances necessary for a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Waiver filed by E-Rate Central, Seaford, New York, on November 18, 2003; Gerrish-Higgins School District, Roscommon, Michigan, on July 10, 2003; Haverhill Public Schools, Haverhill, Massachusetts, on August 7, 2003; Ringwood School District, Ringwood, New Jersey, on July 15, 2003; School District
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-447A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-447A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-447A1.txt
  • expire, pursuant to that order, on February 24, 2005. . Congressional Review Act. The Commission will not send a copy of this Order pursuant to the Congressional Review Act because the Order neither adopts nor modifies a rule, but clarifies an existing rule. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to the authority contained in Sections 0.141, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, and 1.3, this Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the three-way calling requirement set forth in 47 C.F.R. � 64.604(a)(3)(vi) is clarified as indicated herein. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at . FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Dane Snowden, Chief Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau The term
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-462A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-462A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-462A1.txt
  • Company (Administrator). For review of decisions by SLD, requests to the Commission must be filed within 60 days of the issuance of the SLD decision date. Here, the Petitioner filed its request after the 60-day period, in contravention of our rules. We therefore dismiss the Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review by Tiospa Zina Tribal School, Agency Village, South Dakota, filed December 7, 2004, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Greg S. Paulson, Tiospa Zina Tribal School, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-465A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-465A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-465A1.txt
  • Service Administrative Company (Administrator). For review of decisions by SLD, requests to the Commission must be filed within 60 days of the issuance of the SLD decision date. Here, the Applicants filed their requests after the 60-day period, in contravention of our rules. We therefore dismiss their requests. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review by the Board of Education - Unified School District 402, Augusta, Kansas, on July 16, 2003; Brookline Elementary School, Brookline, Vermont, on July 15, 2003; Townshend Elementary School, Townshend, Vermont, on July 21, 2003; and Woodbridge Board of Education, Woodbridge, Connecticut,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-467A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-467A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-467A1.txt
  • a detrimental impact on an applicant does not create special circumstances or suggest particular facts that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. In keeping with our prior decisions, we determine that Northwest Passage School has not demonstrated the special circumstances necessary for a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed by Northwest Passage School, Webster, Wisconsin, on July 5, 2000, is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Steve Ammend, Northwest Passage School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed July
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-477A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-477A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-477A1.txt
  • would be frustrated by application to the instant case, and a grant of the requested waiver would be in the public interest; or (ii) in view of the unique or unusual factual circumstances of the case, application of the rule would be inequitable, unduly burdensome or contrary to the public interest, or the applicant has no reasonable alternative. Additionally, Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules provides authority for a rule waiver upon a showing of good cause. Section 90.617(c) of the Commission's Rules lists the channels available for I/LT applicants in the 800 MHz band; and Section 90.617(d) of the Commission's Rules lists the channels available for SMR applicants. Section 90.617(d) specifically states that the channels listed in that subsection are
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-484A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-484A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-484A1.txt
  • report on or before April 15, 2005. This report shall be addressed to: Suzanne Perrin Room 4-B522 Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 This Order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Lisa B. Griffin, Deputy Division Chief Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 1.718. See Judware v. Verizon, Order, DA 05-6, 2005 WL 22880 (F.C.C.) (January
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-48A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-48A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-48A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of MCI IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section 1.718 of our rules, 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-497A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-497A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-497A1.txt
  • a detrimental impact on an applicant does not create special circumstances or suggest particular facts that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. In keeping with our prior decisions, we determine that the Petitioners here have not demonstrated the special circumstances necessary for a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Waiver filed by Aubrey Independent School District, Aubrey, Texas, on June 3, 2004; Barrow County Schools, Winder, Georgia, on August 16, 2004; Bicentennial Union High School District #76, Salome, Arizona, on May 10, 2004; Campbell County Public Library, Cold Spring, Kentucky, on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-4A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-4A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-4A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that OCI's request for extension IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-4A1_Erratum.doc
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that OCI's request for extension IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-50A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-50A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-50A1.txt
  • See also Orbital Debris Order, 19 FCC Rcd 11567. MSV Application File No. SAT-AMD-20040227-00021 at 41. We construe this request as one to maintain the MSV satellite within 0.1� of its assigned orbital longitude, as assessed at the nodal point of the orbit. MSV Application File No. SAT-AMD-20040227-00021 at 41. MSV Application File No. SAT-AMD-20040227-00021 at 41-42. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (WAIT Radio); Northeast Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). See Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. See WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1157 Regardless of whether MSV seeks such modification, we are following our standard practice of requiring submission of information
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-50A1_Erratum.doc
  • See also Orbital Debris Order, 19 FCC Rcd 11567. MSV Application File No. SAT-AMD-20040227-00021 at 41. We construe this request as one to maintain the MSV satellite within 0.1� of its assigned orbital longitude, as assessed at the nodal point of the orbit. MSV Application File No. SAT-AMD-20040227-00021 at 41. MSV Application File No. SAT-AMD-20040227-00021 at 41-42. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (WAIT Radio); Northeast Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). See Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. See WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1157 Regardless of whether MSV seeks such modification, we are following our standard practice of requiring submission of information
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-51A5.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-51A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-51A5.txt
  • or areas of a screen (e.g., Location field, Selected Licenses area of a screen). bold italic Represents characters that you must type exactly as they appear in the instructions. For example, if you are instructed to type http://auctions.fcc.gov, you should type all of the characters exactly as they are printed. Minimum Hardware and Software Requirements "! able for downloading at http://java.sun.com/products/archive/j2se/1.3.1_08/index.html (choose the JRE version). In addition, users accessing the FCC Automated Auction System via the FCC's Wide Area Network will need: Modem: 28.8 Kbps Hayes(c) compatible modem or faster (56 Kbps recommended) Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) Dialer: Use the Dial-Up Networking feature included with the operating system Accessing the FCC Mock Auction To access the Mock Auction, point your browser to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-51A6.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-51A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-51A6.txt
  • access the FCC Automated Auction System via the FCC Wide Area Network. Minimum Hardware and Software Requirements The following hardware and software, at a minimum, are required to use the FCC Auctions Bidding System: CPU: Pentium 133 or above RAM: 32 MB (64 MB recommended) Monitor: VGA or above Mouse or other pointing device "! higher, with Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1_08. Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1_08 is available for downloading at http://java.sun.com/products/archive/j2se/1.3.1_08/index.html (choose the JRE version). In addition, users accessing the FCC Auctions Bidding System via the FCC's Wide Area Network will need: Modem: 28.8 Kbps Hayes(c) compatible modem or faster (56 Kbps recommended) Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) Dialer: Use the Dial-Up Networking feature included with the operating system Connecting to the FCC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-523A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-523A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-523A1.txt
  • not relevant to the Commission's determination that the license for Station WNGQ365 cancelled automatically when the station's operations were permanently discontinued. Finally, the Commission determined that GEI failed to present any basis on which it could grant GEI a waiver of Section 90.157. GEI filed its Second Petition on March 10, 2004. discussion Initially, we deny GEI's request under Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules for a waiver of the requirements in Section 1.106(b)(2), which provides that ``where the Commission has denied an application for review, a petition for reconsideration will be entertained only if one or more of the following circumstances is present: (i) the petition relies on facts which relate to events which have occurred or circumstances which have
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-536A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-536A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-536A1.txt
  • as the 11.700-12.200 GHz (space-to-Earth), 14.000-14.500 GHz (Earth-to-space) frequency bands. 47 C.F.R. � 25.202(g). See Stamp Grant File No. SAT-LOA-20030827-00177 (Dec 8, 2003); as modified by Stamp Grant, File No. SAT-MOD-20041008-00196, (granted Dec. 6, 2004) (authorizing Echostar to operate at 117� W.L,.rather than at 123�W.L., as initially authorized). 47 C.F.R. � 24.202(g). See 47 C.F.R. � 25.202(g) 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (WAIT Radio); Northeast Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). See Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. See WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1157. Amendment of the Commission's Rules With Regard to the 3650-3700 MHz Government Transfer Band, FCC 00-363, 15 FCC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-538A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-538A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-538A1.txt
  • Copper Valley's request for a waiver and extension of time until February 25, 2006, to comply with the wireless LNP requirements for all porting requests it may receive prior to that date. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i) and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i) and 155(c), sections 1.3 and 52.31(d) of the Commission rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 and 52.31(d), and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.131 and 0.331 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 0.331, the petition filed by Copper Valley Wireless, Inc. is GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey S. Steinberg Deputy Chief, Spectrum and Competition Policy Division See Telephone Number Portability, CC Docket
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-630A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-630A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-630A1.txt
  • a detrimental impact on an applicant does not create special circumstances or suggest particular facts that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. In keeping with our prior decisions, we determine that the Petitioners here have not demonstrated the special circumstances necessary for a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed by Camden Catholic High School, Cherry Hill, New Jersey, on March 17, 2003; Carlisle Area School District, Carlisle, Pennsylvania, on April 8, 2003; and Yeshivat Ateret Torah, Brooklyn, New York, on August 7, 2003, respectively, ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-658A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-658A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-658A1.txt
  • be performed (collectively, ``customer not ready''), Verizon incurs labor costs for which it must be compensated. These costs for unwarranted visits are not included in ordinary repair or installation costs, and there is no reason that Verizon should bear these costs for the CLEC's error. Indeed, the MCI contract explicitly provides for these charges (MCI Contract, Network Elements Attachment �� 1.3, 15). Moreover, requiring CLECs to bear these costs would provide the proper incentive to CLECs to provide accurate information to Verizon. In the case of a misdirect, Verizon should be compensated for the costs of the inside or outside dispatch, testing, and the labor time involved in ascertaining the mistake; in particular, the price schedule should reflect the costs for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-668A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-668A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-668A1.txt
  • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of MCI, Inc. IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section 1.718 of our rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-674A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-674A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-674A1.txt
  • extent it requires service by hand delivery and permit complainants to serve defendants by overnight mail. All other rules relating to formal complaints apply in their entirety, including sections 1.725-1.736 of the Commission's rules. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 208, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and the authority delegated by sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111 and 0.311, that on or before April 22, 2005, informal complainants submit notice of intent to proceed as specified above. Any informal complainant that does not provide such notice waives its right to convert its
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-696A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-696A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-696A1.txt
  • a detrimental impact on an applicant does not create special circumstances or suggest particular facts that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. In keeping with our prior decisions, we determine that the Petitioners here have not demonstrated the special circumstances necessary for a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed by American Falls School District No. 1381, American Falls, Idaho, on June 30, 2003; Berlin-Milan Local Schools, Milan, Ohio, on May 27, 2003; and Humble Independent School District, Humble, Texas, on June 18, 2003, respectively, ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-697A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-697A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-697A1.txt
  • a detrimental impact on an applicant does not create special circumstances or suggest particular facts that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. In keeping with our prior decisions, we determine that the Petitioners here have not demonstrated the special circumstances necessary for a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed by Hereford Independent School District, Hereford, Texas, on May 5, 2003; John A. Coleman Catholic High School, Hurley, New York, on June 4, 2003; Pima Vocational High School, Tucson, Arizona, on April 16, 2003; and Rock Falls Elementary School District
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-6A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-6A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-6A1.txt
  • report on or before February 18, 2005. This report shall be addressed to: Suzanne Perrin Room 4-B522 Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 This Order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Lisa B. Griffin, Deputy Division Chief Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 1.718. See Judware v. Verizon, Order, DA 04-3467, 2004 WL 2434283 (F.C.C.) (November
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-771A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-771A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-771A2.txt
  • ' endstream endobj 22 0 obj<> endobj 23 0 obj<> endobj 24 0 obj<> endobj 25 0 obj<>stream xmlns:pdf='http://ns.adobe.com/pdf/1.3/' pdf:Producer='Acrobat Distiller 6.0 (Windows)'> Auc_58_AcceptedForFilling_050325.xlsjkramer endstream endobj 26 0 obj<> endobj xref 0 27 0000000000 65535 f 0000008501 00000 n 0000008628 00000 n 0000008748 00000 n 0000010602 00000 n 0000010729 00000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-771A3.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-771A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-771A3.txt
  • ]*� endstream endobj 22 0 obj<> endobj 23 0 obj<> endobj 24 0 obj<> endobj 25 0 obj<>stream xmlns:pdf='http://ns.adobe.com/pdf/1.3/' pdf:Producer='Acrobat Distiller 6.0 (Windows)'> Auc_58_AcceptedForFilling_050325_ 2.xlsjkramer< /rdf:li> endstream endobj 26 0 obj<> endobj xref 0 27 0000000000 65535 f 0000008653 00000 n 0000008780 00000 n 0000008900 00000 n 0000010597 00000 n 0000010724
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-84A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-84A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-84A1.txt
  • 2004 and July 31, 2004 data filing deadlines set forth in section 54.903(a) of the Commission's rules for ICLS in areas served by Skyline Telephone. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 154(j), and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, that waiver of sections 54.301(b), 54.903(a), and 54.914(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 54.301(b), 54.903(a), and 54.914(d) IS GRANTED, as described herein, to M&L Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Skyline Telephone Company. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey J. Carlisle Chief Wireline Competition Bureau . ` M&L Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Skyline Telephone
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-90A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-90A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-90A1.txt
  • and procedures. Employee misunderstandings about program rules do not relieve applicants of their responsibility to understand and comply with the program rules or procedures. In keeping with our prior decisions, we find that Community Consolidated has not demonstrated the special circumstances necessary for a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed on June 2, 2004, by Community Consolidated School District 168, Sauk Village, Illinois, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from George Kunkel, Community Consolidated School District 168, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-91A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-91A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-91A1.txt
  • rules and procedures. Hence, neither staffing changes nor misunderstanding of the rules relieves applicants of their responsibility to comply with the Commission's rules and procedures. In keeping with our prior decisions, we determine that Harmony has not demonstrated the special circumstances necessary for a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed September 22, 2004, by Harmony Science Academy, Houston, Texas IS DISMISSED and request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-100A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-100A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-100A1.txt
  • the Association's proposed restriction can be implemented in a way that is fully consistent with the Rule. In view of that possibility, we believe that it is unnecessary and improvident to grant the Association's petition for a waiver. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.4000(d) of the Over-the-Air Reception Devices Rule, 47 C.F.R. � 1.4000(d), and Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that the Petition for Waiver filed by Shadow Woods Condominium Association IS DENIED. This action is taken by the Deputy Chief, Media Bureau, pursuant to authority delegated by Section 0.283 of the Commission's rules. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William H. Johnson Deputy Chief, Media Bureau See Preemption of Local Zoning Regulation of Satellite
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1043A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1043A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1043A1.txt
  • as COMSAT, is `arbitrary and capricious' ... [because] COMSAT and carriers like it will contribute more in universal service payments than they will generate from interstate service.'' TOPUC, 183 F.3d at 434-435. With respect to contributions, the only limiting language of Section 225 is jurisdictional in nature. See 47 U.S.C. � 225(d)(3) (addressing jurisdictional separation of costs). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see generally 2004 TRS Report & Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 12520, para. 110 (discussing standard for waiving Commission rules). Petition at 9-10. (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 06-1043 �@��� A @ A K L \ g � � �
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1073A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1073A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1073A1.txt
    • we invited petitions for rule making to reserve vacant FM allotments for NCE use pursuant to the NCE Second Report and Order. In response to the Public Notice, we received 129 petitions for the reservation of 91 allotments. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.7002(b). See Michael S. Rice, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 16 FCC Rcd 18394 (2001) See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 06-1073 Federal Communications Commission DA 06-1073 m � � � � � � � F � � T�Ӑ � ^� � ^� �
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1100A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1100A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1100A1.txt
    • is not tied to particular benefits contributors may receive from the Fund. Under the rules, a broad range of interstate telecommunications carriers are required to pay into the Fund, regardless of whether they also provide relay services paid for by the Fund or otherwise ``benefit'' directly from the provision of relay service. See 47 C.F.R. � 64.604(c)(5)(iii)(A). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see generally 2004 TRS Report & Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 12520, para. 110 (discussing standard for waiving Commission rules). Petition at 9-10. (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 06-1100 Federal Communications Commission DA 06-1100 �@��� � � � � � � � � = v � `` � " � �
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1101A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1101A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1101A1.txt
    • waiver granted here, we find that regulation pursuant to our Part 61 rules is sufficient to address the concerns raised by Sprint Nextel, until the Commission determines the appropriate treatment of this service under price caps. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 201-205 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 201-205, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, section 61.42(g) of the Commission's rules IS WAIVED for TIPToP services offered by AT&T, with respect to AT&T's 2006 annual access tariff filing requirements under section 61.43 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1104A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1104A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1104A1.txt
    • for Signaling System No. 7. ITU-T Recommendation Q.708 See Mandatory Electronic Filing for International Telecommunications Services and Other International Filings, IB Docket No. 04-226, Report and Order, 20 FCC Rcd 9292 (2005) (Mandatory Electronic Filing Report and Order). Applicants may file a request for waiver of the electronic filing requirements under limited circumstances for good cause shown, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules. See Mandatory Electronic Filing Report and Order, 20 FCC Rcd at 9296, � 13 (citing 47 C.F.R. � 1.3). See Mandatory Electronic Report and Order, 20 FCC Rcd 9292. See Mandatory Electronic Filing for International Telecommunications Services and Other International Filings, 71 Fed. Reg. 18667 (Apr. 12, 2006). The new rules contained information collections that required
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1106A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1106A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1106A1.txt
    • the E-rate mechanism and to determine on a case-by-case basis whether waste, fraud, or abuse of program funds occurred and whether recovery is warranted. III. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the South Carolina Division of the Chief Information Officer Request for Review of the Decision of the Universal Service Administrator and/or in the Alternative, Petition for Waiver IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1179A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1179A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1179A1.txt
    • bands of frequencies between 9 kHz and 275 GHz shall be in accordance with the Table of Allocations. As noted above, in connection with its extension request, GeoLogic seeks a waiver of the priority and preemption requirements of footnote US315 of the Table of Allocations. These requirements are also incorporated by reference in Section 25.136(d) of the Commission's rules. Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules authorizes the Commission to waive its rules for ``good cause shown.'' Waiver is appropriate only if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule and such deviation would better serve the public interest than would strict adherence to the general rule. Generally, the Commission may grant a waiver of its rules in a particular case
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1201A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1201A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1201A1.txt
    • by the short-spacing table. We have also analyzed Puget Sound's mobile interference study and conclude that Puget Sound's mobile units are unlikely to cause interference to the co-channel base station receivers of King County's station. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 2 and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 152, 154(i), and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the request dated July 8, 2004 filed by Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority for a waiver of Section 90.621(b)(4) of the Commission's Rules in connection with FCC File No. 0001865881 filed on December 7, 2004, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1238A1.txt
    • otherwise. Accordingly, we grant Verizon an extension of the limited waiver of section 61.42(g) to exclude advanced services under Tariff FCC No. 20 from price caps only for purposes of the 2006 annual access tariff filing. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 201-205 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 201-205, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, section 61.42(g) of the Commission's rules IS WAIVED for advanced services in Verizon's Tariff FCC No. 20, including those transferred from VADI to Verizon, only with respect to Verizon's 2006 annual access tariff
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1251A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1251A1.txt
    • status report addressing their progress and indicating when they expect to resume compliance with these requirements. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5, 201, 214(a), 251(c)(5), 271, 272, and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i), 155, 201, 214(a), 251(c)(5), 271, 272, and 303(r) and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 32.27, 51.325-335, Part 61, 64.1120(e), and 64.1901-1903 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 32.27, 51.325-335, Part 61, 64.1120(e), and 64.1901-1903 BellSouth's Petition IS GRANTED and the Verizon and Qwest Petitions ARE GRANTED to the extent set forth herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Petition of BellSouth Corporation for Special Temporary Authority
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1260A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1260A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1260A1.txt
    • is effected by waiving section 61.42(g). In contrast, Hawaiian has not provided any facts or analysis to support a waiver of sections 61.38 and 61.49. Accordingly, we deny Hawaiian's request for a waiver of these rules. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 201-205 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 201-205, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, section 61.42(g) of the Commission's rules IS WAIVED for Advanced Services in Hawaiian's FCC Tariff No. 2, only with respect to Hawaiian's 2006 annual access tariff filing requirements under section 61.43 of the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1261A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1261A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1261A1.txt
    • of Wireless Services, and to Facilitate Capital Formation, WT Docket No. 03-202, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making, 19 FCC Rcd 19078 (2004). See File No. 0002090258 (Waiver Request). Id. Id. See Waiver Denial Letter at 2. Id. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.946(c), 1.955(a)(2), 90.685. 47 C.F.R. � 1.946(e). 47 C.F.R. � 1.925. Alternatively, pursuant to section 1.3, the Commission may waive its rules if there is ``good cause'' to do so. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Petition at 4. Id. at 2. Id. at 5. 47 U.S.C. � 309(j). Id. at 2. Id. at 2 and 5. See Instapage Network, Ltd., Notification of Construction and Request for Waiver of Narrowband PCS Station KNKV222, Order on Reconsideration, 17 FCC
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1265A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1265A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1265A1.txt
    • aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under our own procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed by Richmond County School District ARE GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1328A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1328A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1328A1.txt
    • be imposed or should be reduced shall include a detailed factual statement and such documentation and affidavits as may be pertinent.'' Section 1.80(f)(3) of the Rules. 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(f)(3). Public Notice: Low Power FM Filing Window Deadline Extended, 15 FCC Rcd 9533 (2000). 47 C.F.R. � 73.870(b). Waivers will only be granted for ``good cause shown.'' 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. We note that 916 Radio, by continuing to operate an unlicensed station, after receiving warnings from the San Francisco Office, was not in compliance with the Commission's Rules when it filed the March 17, 2005 waiver request and application. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.854 (``No application for an LPFM station may be granted unless the applicant certifies, under penalty of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1372A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1372A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1372A1.txt
    • Monday, July 3, 2006. A request has been made to further extend that filing deadline until July 7, 2006. Due to the impact of recent inclement weather in the Washington, D.C. area and the proximity of the July 3, 2006 deadline to the July 4th holiday, the Media Bureau finds good cause to grant that request. Accordingly, pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, we extend the July 3, 2006 filing deadline set forth in the 2006 Public Notice to Friday, July 7, 2006. . TTY: (202) 418-7172. --FCC-- See Second Periodic Review of the Commission's Rules and Policies Affecting the Conversion To Digital Television, 19 FCC Rcd 18279, 18314-15, para. 78 (2004) (citations omitted) (``Second DTV Periodic Review Report
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1419A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1419A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1419A1.txt
    • Specifically, we extend the date that the Sagebrush Carriers must achieve 95% penetration until June 30, 2007. We further impose conditions and reporting requirements to ensure that the Sagebrush Carriers achieve full compliance with the Commission's E911 requirements. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the ENHANCE 911 Act, Pub. L. No. 108-494, 118 Stat. 3986 (2004), and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the foregoing Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Request for Extension/Waiver of the 95% Penetration Compliance Deadline IS GRANTED( subject to the conditions and reporting requirements specified herein. The deadline for compliance with Section 20.18(g)(1)(v) will be June 30, 2007. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1420A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1420A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1420A1.txt
    • Fairbanks until January 31, 2007, consistent with ACSW's deadline for the remainder of its Alaska service area. We further impose the conditions and reporting requirements described above to ensure that ACSW achieves full compliance with the Commission's E911 requirements. ordering clauses IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the ENHANCE 911 Act, Pub. L. No. 108-494, 118 Stat. 3986 (2004), and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the foregoing Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Petition of ACS Wireless for Limited Waiver of 95% Handset Penetration Deadline for Anchorage and Fairbanks IS GRANTED, subject to the conditions and reporting requirements specified herein. The deadline for compliance with Section 20.18(g)(1)(v) will be January
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1438A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1438A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1438A1.txt
    • that the requested waiver be granted. This Order therefore grants Clarity's waiver request. As a result, Clarity may proceed with either TCB certification or Self-Declaration of Conformity pursuant to Part 68 of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.141 and 0.361 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the request for waiver of section 68.317(f) for Model C4105, filed by Clarity, A Division of Plantronics, Inc., IS GRANTED to the extent stated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: (1) the volume reset override switch shall be labeled as such
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1493A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1493A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1493A1.txt
    • ORDERED that DIRECTV Enterprises, LLC IS AUTHORIZED to operate the Fixed Satellite Service Ka-band space station of its DIRECTV 9S satellite in the 28.35-28.60 GHz, 29.25-29.50 GHz, and 29.50-30.00 GHz frequency bands in the Earth-to-space (uplink) direction, and in the 18.3-18.8 GHz and 19.7-20.2 GHz frequency bands in the space-to-Earth (downlink) direction. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, DIRECTV Enterprises, LLC IS GRANTED a waiver of Section 25.202(g) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 25.202(g), to use the 14002-14004 MHz and 14496-14498 MHz bands for telecommand operations during transfer orbit for no longer than a 15-day period from the time of launch of the DIRECTV 9S satellite until it
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1525A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1525A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1525A2.txt
    • 556 500]>> endobj 63 0 obj<> endobj 121 0 obj<>stream � endstream endobj 122 0 obj 1149 endobj 123 0 obj<>stream �Ef�p(w��2� f�Nv:�� IQ''�)!��&!�`31)D���B� , �&� endstream endobj 124 0 obj<>stream xmlns:pdf='http://ns.adobe.com/pdf/1.3/' pdf:CreationDate--Text='27 Jul 06 18:04'> Euripides endstream endobj xref 0 125 0000000053 65535 f 0000000016 00000 n 0000000176 00000 n 0000000254 00000 n 0000000417 00000 n 0000000460 00000 n 0000000494 00000 n 0000000591 00000 n 0000000686 00000 n 0000000776 00000 n 0000007333
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1550A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1550A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1550A1.txt
    • Petition to Dismiss filed by Blakeney Communications, Inc., IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein and IS DENIED in all other respects. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that Clear Channel Broadcasting Licenses, Inc., IS ADMONISHED for its late-filed license application in violation of Section 73.3598(a) of the Commission's Rules and for its failure to have requested a waiver pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules. Finally, IT IS ORDERED, that Section 73.3598(e) of the Commission's Rules IS WAIVED to the extent indicated, and the WRKH(FM) license application (File No. BLH-20050615ACP) IS GRANTED. Sincerely, Peter H. Doyle Chief, Audio Division Media Bureau cc: Anne Goodwin Crump, Esq. Marissa G. Repp, Esq. CCBL filed an Opposition to the Petition on July 7, 2005,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1574A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1574A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1574A1.txt
    • in accordance with the terms of this Order. In remanding these applications to USAC, we make no finding as to the ultimate eligibility of the requested services. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 54.722(a), and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91 and 0.291, that the Request for Waiver of 47 C.F.R. �54.504(b) filed by Utica City School District, Utica, New York IS GRANTED and IS REMANDED to USAC for further consideration
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1582A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1582A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1582A1.txt
    • 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Section 1.41 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.41, the Emergency Request regarding the pleading cycle filed by Maritime Communications/Land Mobile, LLC on November 2, 2005, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, the Request to Accept Apparently Late Filing Of Petition to Deny filed by Warren C. Havens, Intelligent Transportation & Monitoring Wireless LLC, AMTS Consortium, LLC, Telesaurus-VPC, LLC, and Telesaurus Holdings GB LLC on November 14, 2005, IS GRANTED IN PART to the extent described above. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1589A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1589A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1589A1.txt
    • conformance to the applicable emissions limit. The measurement procedures defined herein are specific to the SafeScout imaging device as described in the subject waiver request and are not generally applicable to all swept-frequency transmitting systems. CONCLUSION AND ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.31 and 0.241 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. sections 0.31, 0.241, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. section 1.3, IT IS ORDERED that the Request for Waiver filed by SafeView, Inc. IS GRANTED consistent with the terms of this Order. This action is taken pursuant to Sections 4(i), 302, 303(e), and 303(R) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. Sections 154(i), 302, 303(e), and 303(r). This action is
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1608A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1608A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1608A1.txt
    • public safety services immediately available to satisfy Cumberland's requested public safety use. In addition, grant of the requested waiver will be in the public interest, because it will improve public safety communications in Cumberland County. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 2 and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 152, 154(i), and Section 1.3 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the waiver request by the County of Cumberland dated August 13, 2004 and filed in connection with FCC File No. 0001840813 SHALL BE GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 309(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1629A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1629A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1629A1.txt
    • now available for filing, we doubt that circumstances such as those described by this petitioner will be considered ``special circumstances'' in the future. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.802(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.802(a), filed by Cellular South Licenses, Inc. IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin Chief Wireline Competition Bureau Cellular South Licenses, Inc., Petition for Waiver of Section 54.802 of the Commission's Rules, CC
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1630A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1630A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1630A1.txt
    • January 1, 2005 certification deadline will allow Southern to be eligible for universal service at the beginning of the second quarter of 2005. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of the April 1, 2004 and October 1, 2004 certification deadlines in section 54.314(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.314(d), filed by Centennial Cellular Tri-State Operating Partnership and Centennial Claiborne Cellular Corp. on January 21, 2005, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1631A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1631A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1631A1.txt
    • make funding calculations. Accordingly, any administrative burdens resulting from the delay are outweighed by the public interest benefits of granting the requested waiver. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.313 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.313, filed by Pine Belt Cellular, Inc., IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin Chief Wireline Competition Bureau Pine Belt Cellular, Inc., Petition for Waiver of Section 54.313 of the Commission's Rules, CC
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1632A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1632A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1632A1.txt
    • U.S.C. � 214(e). 47 U.S.C. � 254(e). See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.307, 54.313, 54.314, 54.802, 54.809, 54.903. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.307. See Petition at 6. Id. at 7. Id. Id. at 8. Id. Id. at 17. Id. at 14. See id. at 8. Id. Id. at 15-16. Id. at 9. See id. at 6, 15, 16. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (``Northeast Cellular''). WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969); Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. Tucson Radio, Inc. v. FCC, 452 F.2d 1380, 1382 (D.C. Cir. 1971). See Mary Ann Salvatoriello, FCC 91-243, Memorandum Opinion and Order,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1633A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1633A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1633A1.txt
    • in accordance with Commission rules, USAC should have deemed the certifications of Buggs Island and Pembroke filed on Monday, October 3, 2005, as timely filed. We direct USAC to implement the conclusions in this Order by disbursing first quarter 2005 funds to Buggs Island and Pembroke. ORDERING CLAUSE ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the Petition for Waiver of Deadline in 47 C.F.R. �� 54.313, 54.314 filed by Buggs Island Telephone Cooperative on October 18, 2005, and the Petition for Waiver of Section 54.314(d)(1) of the Commission's Rules filed by Pembroke Telephone Cooperative on October 31, 2005, ARE GRANTED. FEDERAL
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1642A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1642A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1642A1.txt
    • fraud, or abuse under our own procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), this Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b), is WAIVED with regard to Requests for Review filed by Colegio Evangelico Capitan Correa, Colegio Jardin, Colegio Kiany, Guamani Private School, Southwestern Educational Society, and St. Francis School, Inc. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1643A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1643A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1643A1.txt
    • from the release of this Order and issue an award or denial based on a complete review and analysis. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the Request for Review filed by Providence Public School District IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1645A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1645A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1645A1.txt
    • telecommunications plant and expenses and develop separations factors in accordance with the separations procedures in effect as of December 31, 2000. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the joint petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze as codified in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Sacred Wind Communications, Inc. and Qwest Corporation on March 30, 2006, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i),
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1656A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1656A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1656A1.txt
    • aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under our own procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed by Douglas-Omaha Technology Commission, Omaha, Nebraska, IS GRANTED, and the application IS REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1770A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1770A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1770A1.txt
    • aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under our own procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed by Owensboro Public Schools, Owensboro, Kentucky, IS GRANTED, and the application IS REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1776A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1776A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1776A1.txt
    • this Order and the condition placed on the license by section 1.2110(g)(4) of the Commission's rules, and Big Sky will remain subject to the Commission's debt collection procedures. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority granted in Sections 4(i) and 309(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 309(j), and sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, Big Sky is GRANTED, to the extent described herein, a nunc pro tunc waiver of the automatic cancellation provision of section 1.2110(g)(4)(iv), 47 C.F.R. � 1.2110(g)(4)(iv), for its BRS license for the Butte, Montana BTA. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority granted in Section 4(i) of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1802A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1802A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1802A1.txt
    • Anglers and New Beginning demonstrate, this confluence of factors strongly suggests that mandated closed captioning would pose an undue burden on such a petitioner. ordering clauseS Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 5(c) and 713 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 155 and 613, and sections 0.141, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, and 1.3, this Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for exemption from the closed captioning requirements of section 79.1 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 79.1, filed by Anglers for Christ Ministries, Inc., IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for exemption from the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1806A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1806A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1806A1.txt
    • 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Scott County School System, Huntsville, Tennessee, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the deadline for filing the FCC Form 486 for Scott County School System, Huntsville, Tennessee, IS WAIVED and the application IS REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1859A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1859A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1859A1.txt
    • that its LECs recovered $100 million less than it had projected. It argues that it is similarly situated to AT&T for purposes of being allowed to recover its remaining LNP costs and seeks relief that is similar to what the Commission granted to AT&T. DISCUSSION We find that Verizon has demonstrated special circumstances warranting a waiver of section 61.45(d). Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules provides the Commission with the authority to grant waivers "if good cause therefore is shown." Courts have interpreted this rule as requiring petitioners to demonstrate that special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule and that such a deviation will serve the public interest. We find that it is in the public interest and consistent
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1860A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1860A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1860A1.txt
    • email. We therefore grant Pine Belt a waiver of sections 54.307(c) and 54.802(c) of the Commission's rules. . ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, the SouthEast Telephone, Inc. Petition for Waiver of Deadlines in Sections 54.307(c)(2) and 54.802(a) of the Commission's Rules, the Cellular Network Partnership d/b/a Pioneer Cellular Petition for Waiver of Deadline in 47 C.F.R. � 54.307(c)(2) and the Pine Belt Cellular, Inc. Petition for Waiver of Sections 54.307(c) and 54.802(a)
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1861A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1861A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1861A1.txt
    • Accordingly, we find that waiving section 54.802(a) of the Commission's rules will serve the public interest by preserving and advancing universal service. . ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.802(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.802(a), filed by Verizon Communications Inc. IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin Chief Wireline Competition Bureau Verizon Communications, Inc. Petition for Waiver of Section 54.802(a) of the FCC's Rules, CC Docket No.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1871A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1871A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1871A1.txt
    • aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under our own procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review and/or Requests for Waiver filed by the Petitioners as listed in the Appendix ARE GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. ��
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1907A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1907A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1907A1.txt
    • integrity of the program and will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under our own procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 54.722(a), and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91 and 0.291, that the Requests for Review as listed in Appendices A, B, C, and D of this Order ARE GRANTED and ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1976A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1976A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1976A1.txt
    • Request for Waiver at 3. See USAC Letter at 1. Id. Id. (retrieved Aug. 22, 2006). USAC Letter at 2; 47 C.F.R. � 54.711(b); see 47 C.F.R. � 54.709 (setting dates for contributor filings and determining the contribution factor). USAC Letter at 2. Id. See Request for Waiver. Request for Waiver at 1. Id. at 1, 5-7. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157, (D.C. Cir. 1969), aff'd, 459 F.2d 1203 (D.C. Cir. 1972). Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. 47 C.F.R. � 54.611. We note that Unicom's account balance will be adjusted continuously as USAC receives information about Unicom's universal
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.txt
    • limit the potential increase in interference and maintain the utility of this band for passive remote sensing, the transmit power levels of future stations in the fixed and mobile (except aeronautical mobile) services needs to be reduced to protect the Earth exploration-satellite (passive) and space research (passive) services. Document WAC/119(04.10.06): DRAFT PROPOSALS FOR THE WORK OF THE CONFERENCE Agenda Item 1.3: in accordance with Resolution 747 (WRC-03), consider upgrading the radiolocation service to primary allocation status in the bands 9 000-9 200 MHz and 9 300-9 500 MHz, and extending by up to 200 MHz the existing primary allocations to the Earth exploration-satellite service (active) and the space research service (active) in the band 9 500-9 800 without placing undue constraint
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-202A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-202A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-202A1.txt
    • meteorological-satellite (MetSat) services in this band would reduce the workload of the Bureau in identifying affected administrations and the number of unnecessary coordinations for such systems while maintaining the rights of administrations to be included in requests for coordination involving the MetSat or FSS service in this band. Document WAC/082(25.01.06): DRAFT PROPOSALS FOR THE WORK OF THE CONFERENCE Agenda Item 1.3: in accordance with Resolution 747 (WRC-03), consider upgrading the radiolocation service to primary allocation status in the bands 9 000 - 9 200 MHz and 9 300 - 9 500 MHz, and extending by up to 200 MHz the existing primary allocations to the Earth exploration-satellite service (active) and the space research service (active) in the band 9 500 -
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2093A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2093A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2093A1.txt
    • that gives band managers and their customers substantial financial incentive to deploy equipment and use their spectrum. Access Supplemental Reply at ii. Access also asserts that, given the Commission's control over spectrum transfer and assignments, it can implement this consolidation without damaging the integrity of the 220 MHz licensing scheme as BizCom suggests. Id. 47 C.F.R. � 1.925(b). Additionally, Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules provides authority for rule waivers upon a showing of good cause. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Section 309(j) of the Communications Act states that the Commission shall include performance requirements to ensure prompt delivery of services, to prevent stockpiling and warehousing of spectrum by licensees, and to promote investment and deployment of new technologies and services. See
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2108A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2108A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2108A1.txt
    • pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under our own procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. III. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to the authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Berrien County Intermediate School District Appeal IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to the authority delegated in
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2111A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2111A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2111A1.txt
    • factors. Accordingly, RuralTel is required to recalculate its jurisdictional separations factors pursuant to the Separations Freeze Order and the Commission's rules. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze as codified in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Rural Telephone Service Company, Inc., Nex-Tech, Inc., United Telephone Company of Kansas, and United Telephone of Eastern Kansas on April 12, 2006, IS CONDITIONALLY GRANTED, as
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2112A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2112A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2112A1.txt
    • factors. Accordingly, Gorham is required to recalculate its jurisdictional separations factors pursuant to the Separations Freeze Order and the Commission's rules. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the joint petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze as codified in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Gorham Telephone Company, Inc., and Rural Telephone Service Company, Inc., on June 15, 2006, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2235A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2235A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2235A1.txt
    • to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under our own procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. III. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and the authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Benavides Independent School District, Benavides, Texas IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and the authority
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-223A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-223A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-223A1.txt
    • �Z����=�N� Z�0� � �,�� endstream endobj 11 0 obj<>stream �d� �&4 �"D� /�O`G�ߞ�eL�������I�*�88^u7AL���kE���'� endstream endobj 12 0 obj<> endobj 13 0 obj<> endobj 14 0 obj<> endobj 15 0 obj<>stream xmlns:pdf='http://ns.adobe.com/pdf/1.3/' pdf:Producer='Acrobat Distiller 6.0.1 (Windows)'> 2 _ endstream endobj 16 0 obj<> endobj xref 0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2257A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2257A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2257A1.txt
    • MEDIA BUREAU ACTION REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF 47 C.F.R. � 76.1204(a)(1) FILED WITH THE COMMISSION CSR-7056-Z/CS Docket No. 97-80 Comment Date: November 30, 2006 Reply Comment Date: December 11, 2006 The National Cable and Telecommunications Association (``NCTA'' or ``Petitioner'') has filed a request pursuant to Section 629(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Communications Act''), and Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's rules, for temporary waiver of the prohibition set forth in Section 76.1204(a)(1) of the Commission's rules on offering navigation devices that perform both conditional access and other functions. Specifically, NCTA requests that the Commission waive the prohibition for all cable operators until those cable operators deploy downloadable security or until December 31, 2009, whichever is
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2258A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2258A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2258A1.txt
    • WAIVER OF 47 C.F.R. � 76.1204(a)(1) FILED WITH THE COMMISSION CSR-7057-Z/CS Docket No. 97-80 Comment Date: November 30, 2006 Reply Comment Date: December 11, 2006 Bend Cable Communications, LLC d/b/a BendBroadband (``BendBroadband'' or ``Petitioner'') has filed a request pursuant to Section 629(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, Section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, and Sections 1.3, 76.7, and 76.1207 of the Commission's rules, for waiver of the prohibition set forth in Section 76.1204(a)(1) of the Commission's rules on offering navigation devices that perform both conditional access and other functions with respect to the Motorola DCT-700 set-top box (the ``DCT-700''). BendBroadband asserts that its Waiver Request is limited in scope to the type of device the Commission
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2293A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2293A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2293A1.txt
    • R>>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]/ExtGState<>>> endobj 6 0 obj<>stream �~A�i7&>.h�!� ��t^�-�( -�/6_l,���e[k �� TP�"fo��,~�Mc� ��l�]׍� ����(p endstream endobj 7 0 obj<> endobj 8 0 obj<> endobj 9 0 obj<> endobj 10 0 obj<>stream xmlns:pdf='http://ns.adobe.com/pdf/1.3/' pdf:Producer='Acrobat Distiller 7.0 (Windows)'> Microsoft Word - Estrada MOO to OBC.docNathan .Wheeler endstream endobj 11 0 obj<> endobj xref 0 12 0000000000 65535 f 0000009610 00000
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2298A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2298A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2298A1.txt
    • 1.1, rounded; the second additional acceptable bid amount equals the minimum acceptable bid amount times one plus two times the bid increment percentage, rounded, or (minimum acceptable bid amount) * 1.2, rounded; the third additional acceptable bid amount equals the minimum acceptable bid amount times one plus three times the bid increment percentage, rounded, or (minimum acceptable bid amount) * 1.3, rounded; etc. We will round the results of these calculations, as well as the calculations to determine the minimum acceptable bid amounts, using our standard rounding procedures. For Auction No. 71, the Bureau proposes to use a bid increment percentage of ten percent to calculate the eight additional acceptable bid amounts. The Bureau retains the discretion to change the minimum
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2306A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2306A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2306A1.txt
    • Review filed by Abington School District IS GRANTED and REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that sections 54.504(b)(2)(iii)-(iv), (c)(1)(iv)-(v) and 54.508(c)-(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 54.504(b)(2)(iii)-(iv), (c)(1)(iv)-(v) and 54.508(c)-(d), ARE WAIVED to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2316A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2316A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2316A1.txt
    • the special circumstances presented while reasonably minimizing the amount of time during which non-compliant devices operate in the band, and thus best serve the public interest in this case. v. ORDERING CLAUSE 14. Accordingly, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 302, 303(e), and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 302, 303(e), and 303(r)) and Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules (47 C.F.R. � 1.3), and under the authority delegated in sections 0.31 and 0.241 of the Commission's rules (47 C.F.R. �� 0.31, 0.241), IT IS ORDERED that the following waivers are granted: 1) Respironics, Inc. is permitted to manufacture and sell for a period of 12 months from the release of this Order a maximum number
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2368A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2368A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2368A1.txt
    • this Order or, if it fails to pay this balance within ten (10) business days of the release of this Order, it may pay the remaining balance within ten (10) business days after the payment deadline, provided that it also pays a late fee equal to five percent of the amount due. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, the Request for Waiver filed by Maritime Communications/Land Mobile, LLC on August 21, 2006, IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Section 1.45 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.45, the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2370A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2370A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2370A1.txt
    • support amounts are necessary. Payments for periods subsequent to December 2007 will be based on historic data in accordance with the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that waiver of sections 36.611 and 36.612 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 36.611 and 36.612, IS GRANTED, as described herein, to Adak Eagle Enterprises, LLC d/b/a Adak Telephone Utility. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2408A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2408A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2408A2.txt
    • R 10 0 R 13 0 R 16 0 R 19 0 R 22 0 R 25 0 R]/Type/Pages/Parent 42 0 R>> endobj 44 0 obj<> endobj 45 0 obj<>stream xmlns:pdf='http://ns.adobe.com/pdf/1.3/' pdf:Producer='Acrobat Distiller 6.0.1 (Windows)'> Grant PN Att A.xlsdavid.hu endstream endobj 46 0 obj<> endobj xref 0 47 0000000000 65535 f 0000005042 00000 n 0000005168 00000 n 0000005262 00000 n 0000006542
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2408A3.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2408A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2408A3.txt
    • R 10 0 R 13 0 R 16 0 R 19 0 R 22 0 R 25 0 R]/Type/Pages/Parent 42 0 R>> endobj 44 0 obj<> endobj 45 0 obj<>stream xmlns:pdf='http://ns.adobe.com/pdf/1.3/' pdf:Producer='Acrobat Distiller 6.0.1 (Windows)'> Grant PN Att A1.xlsdavid.h u endstream endobj 46 0 obj<> endobj xref 0 47 0000000000 65535 f 0000005214 00000 n 0000005340 00000 n 0000005434 00000 n 0000006864
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-240A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-240A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-240A1.txt
    • it to retain its current regulatory status until the Commission concludes its review of the all-or-nothing rule in the MAG Second Further Notice. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 61.41, filed by New Valor on December 22, 2005, IS GRANTED to the extent described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Valor Communications Group, Inc., Petition for Waiver (filed Dec. 22, 2005)
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2437A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2437A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2437A1.txt
    • 1.1, rounded; the second additional acceptable bid amount equals the minimum acceptable bid amount times one plus two times the bid increment percentage, rounded, or (minimum acceptable bid amount) * 1.2, rounded; the third additional acceptable bid amount equals the minimum acceptable bid amount times one plus three times the bid increment percentage, rounded, or (minimum acceptable bid amount) * 1.3, rounded; etc. The Bureau will round the results of these calculations, as well as the calculations to determine the minimum acceptable bid amounts, using the Bureau's standard rounding procedures. For Auction No. 72, the Bureau proposes to use a bid increment percentage of ten percent to calculate the eight additional acceptable bid amounts. The Bureau retains the discretion to change
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-244A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-244A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-244A1.txt
    • therefore grant a waiver to Glendale and remand its application to USAC for further action consistent with this order. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review and/or Waiver filed by Glendale Unified School District, Glendale, California, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2462A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2462A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2462A1.txt
    • instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under our own procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to the authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, waiver of section 54.720(b) IS GRANTED to Friendship House. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to the authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-246A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-246A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-246A1.txt
    • 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed by RelComm, Inc., West Berlin, New Jersey, on August 6, 2004 and February 26, 2005, concerning FCC Form 471 application numbers 370716, 374023, and 404818 ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91. 0.291, and 1.3, that the Request for Waiver of sections 54.721(d) and 54.725 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 54.721(d) and 54.725, filed by the Atlantic City Board of Education, Atlantic City, New Jersey, on October 18, 2004, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dana R. Shaffer Deputy Chief Wireline Competition Bureau
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2532A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2532A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2532A1.txt
    • Relay calls in such a way that they include a VoIP call, so that the VoIP registration could apply to the VRS or IP Relay call. These issues remain pending. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in Section 225 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 225, and Sections 0.141, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, 1.3, this Order IS ADOPTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Monica Desai, Chief Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau See 47 C.F.R. � 64.604(a)(4); see generally Telecommunications Relay Services and Speech-to-Speech Services for Individuals with Hearing and Speech Disabilities, CC Docket Nos. 90-571 & 98-67, CG Docket No. 03-123, Report and Order, Order on
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2543A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2543A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2543A1.txt
    • DA 06-2543 Released: December 18, 2006 MEDIA BUREAU ACTION REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF 47 C.F.R. � 76.1204(a)(1) FILED WITH THE COMMISSION CSR-7078-Z Docket No. 97-80 Comment Date: January 8, 2007 Reply Comment Date: January 18, 2007 Cablevision Systems Corporation (``Cablevision'' or ``Petitioner'') has filed a request pursuant to Section 629(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Sections 1.3, 76.7, and 76.1207 of the Commission's rules, for limited waiver of the prohibition set forth in Section 76.1204(a)(1) of the Commission's rules on offering navigation devices that perform both conditional access and other functions. Cablevision seeks either (1) a clarification that navigation devices that rely upon separate security other than CableCARDs - specifically, SmartCards, a separable-security conditional access system developed
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2544A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2544A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2544A1.txt
    • Regard to the 3650-3700 MHz Government Transfer Band, First Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, IB Docket No. 98-237, 15 FCC Rcd 20488, 20538 (2000) (the rule effectively ``limits FSS operators to operating TT&C links in the same frequency bands as their FSS operations''). The Commission may waive its rules for ``good cause shown.'' 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Generally, the Commission may grant a waiver of its rules if the relief requested would not undermine the purpose of the rule in question and would otherwise serve the public interest. WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969). First Space Station Licensing Reform Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 10810-12. See 47 C.F.R. � 25.116(b), (d). See
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2545A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2545A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2545A1.txt
    • of the allocated band(s)). Amendment of the Commission's rules with Regard to the 3650-3700 MHz Government Transfer Band, First Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, IB Docket No. 98-237, 15 FCC Rcd 20488, 20538 (2000) (the rule effectively ``limits FSS operators to operating TT&C links in the same frequency bands as their FSS operations''). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969) aff'd 459 F.2d 1203 (D.C. Cir. 1972). WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1159. ICO has also requested that the Commission defer action on its waiver request pending its attempt to coordinate its proposed use of C-band
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2550A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2550A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2550A1.txt
    • Petitioners to comply with these commitments. Thus, we conclude that waiver of Section 36.612 of the Commission's rules is in the public interest. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the Petition of CenturyTel of Central Wisconsin, LLC and Telephone USA of Wisconsin, LLC for Waiver of Section 36.601(a)(3) of the Commission's Rules, IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Kirk S. Burgee Associate Chief Wireline Competition Bureau Petition of CenturyTel of Central Wisconsin, LLC and Telephone USA of Wisconsin,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2557A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2557A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2557A1.txt
    • ORDERING CLAUSES Based on the foregoing, we find that granting Intelsat's modification application, as amended, will allow for greater efficiencies in providing important Launch and Early Orbit Phase operations. Accordingly, Intelsat North America LLC's applications, File Nos. SES-MOD-20050615-00751 and SES-AMD-20051116-01587 are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, to the extent indicated above. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that Intelsat North America LLC's request for a waiver of 47 C.F.R. � 25.212(d) is GRANTED, and Intelsat is authorized to increase its maximum power density to +10.5 dBW/4KHz for the 6420.5-6425 MHz bands and to +8 dBW/4 kHz for the 5925.0-5929.5 MHz frequency band during the limited times and under the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2558A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2558A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2558A1.txt
    • and Order, Fifth Report and Order, Fourth Memorandum Opinion and Order, and Order, WT Docket No. 02-55, et al., 19 FCC Rcd 14969 (2004) (Rebanding Report and Order). Rebanding Report and Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 15079 � 205 (footnote omitted). Rebanding Report and Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 15079 � 206 (citing 47 C.F.R. � 1.925). Pursuant to Section 1.3, the Commission may waive its rules if there is ``good cause'' to do so and if certain other criteria are satisfied. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990). In the context of 800 MHz Rebanding, the Commission defines ``good cause basis'' as a showing that the licensee would have
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2560A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2560A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2560A1.txt
    • of the requested C-band spectrum is allocated to the Fixed Service (FS) and FSS on a co-primary basis, although a portion (6425-6525 MHz) is allocated to FSS and Mobile Service (MS) on a co-primary basis. Virtual Geo requests a waiver of the Commission's allocation rules, to the extent necessary, to permit it to use the requested C-band frequency segments. Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules authorizes the Commission to waive its rules for ``good cause shown.'' Waiver is appropriate only if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, and such deviation would better serve the public interest than would strict adherence to the general rule. Generally, the Commission may grant a waiver of its rules in a particular case
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2581A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2581A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2581A1.txt
    • we find that waiving section 54.802(a) and 54.809(c) of the Commission's rules will serve the public interest by preserving and advancing universal service. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.802(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.802(a), filed by MCI, Inc., on January 7, 2005, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2582A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2582A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2582A1.txt
    • is eligible to receive support for the nine-month period beginning April 1, 2006, and ending December 31, 2006. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, the Mid-Tex Cellular, Ltd. Petition for Waiver of the Commission's Universal Service Rules IS GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin Chief Wireline Competition Bureau Mid-Tex Cellular, Ltd. Petition for Waiver of the FCC's Universal Service Rules, CC Docket No.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2584A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2584A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2584A1.txt
    • service areas. Accordingly, we find that waiving section 54.904(d) of the Commission's rules will serve the public interest by preserving and advancing universal service. ORDERING CLAUSE ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Petition for Waiver of the Deadline in 47 C.F.R. � 54.904(d) filed by North River Telephone Cooperative on November 17, 2005, IS GRANTED, as described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin Chief Wireline Competition Bureau North River Telephone Cooperative Petition for Waiver of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2585A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2585A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2585A1.txt
    • filings. We therefore deny San Isabel's request for waiver of section 54.307(c) of the September 30, 2003 and December 30, 2003, filing deadlines. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of the October 1, 2002, certification deadline in section 54.314(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.314(d), filed by San Isabel Telecom, Inc. on January 26, 2004, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2590A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2590A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2590A1.txt
    • as moot. CONcLUSION AND ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the modification application, File No. SAT-MOD-20060830-00092, IS GRANTED and EchoStar Satellite Operating Corporation IS AUTHORIZED to operate the EchoStar 9 satellite in the 18.3-18.5 GHz, 18.6-18.8 GHz, 19.7-20.2 GHz, 28.4-28.6 GHz, and 29.3-30.0 GHz frequency bands at the 121� W.L. orbital location. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the request of EchoStar Satellite Operating Corporation for a waiver of Section 25.210(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 25.210(d), IS GRANTED, with the condition that the EchoStar 9 satellite shall claim no more protection against interference to its operations from other licensed radiocommunication systems operating in accordance with the Commission's
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2591A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2591A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2591A1.txt
    • AMC-16 Ku-band Order, 21 FCC Rcd at 3434. AMC-16 Ka-band Application at pp. 13-14. AMC-16 Ku-band Order, 21 FCC Rcd at 3434 (citing VisionStar Incorporated, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 19 FCC Rcd 14820, 14825 � 12 (Int'l Bur. 2004); and Tempo Satellite, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11069, 11072 � 10 (Int'l Bur. 1998)). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, (D.C. Cir. 1969); Dominion Video Satellite, Inc., Order and Authorization, 14 FCC Rcd 8182 (Int'l Bur. 1999). AMC-16 Ka-band Application at p. 7. AMC-16 Ka-band Application at p. 15. Compare AMC-16 Ku-band Order, 21 FCC Rcd 3430 (service to U.S. DTH
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-279A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-279A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-279A1.txt
    • the BRS license automatically cancelled. Given the totality of the circumstances, we find that a nunc pro tunc waiver of the automatic cancellation of the license serves the public interest. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority granted in Sections 4(i) and 309(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 309(j), and sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, Leaco is GRANTED a nunc pro tunc waiver of the automatic cancellation of its licenses pursuant to section 1.2110(g)(4)(iv), 47 C.F.R. � 1.2110(g)(4)(iv). This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to sections 0.131 and 0.331 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 0.331. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Catherine
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-381A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-381A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-381A1.txt
    • of this Order and the condition placed on the license by section 1.2110(g)(4) of the Commission's rules, and Advanced will remain subject to the Commission's debt collection procedures. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority granted in Sections 4(i) and 309(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 309(j), and sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, Advanced is GRANTED, to the extent described herein, a nunc pro tunc waiver of the automatic cancellation provision of section 1.2110(g)(4)(iv), 47 C.F.R. � 1.2110(g)(4)(iv), for its five 900 MHz SMR licenses. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority granted in Section 4(i) of the Communications Act
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-418A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-418A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-418A1.txt
    • small LECs would undermine this goal. Thus, we conclude that waiver of Section 54.301 of the Commission's rules is in the public interest. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petitions for waiver of section 54.301 of the Commission's rules, filed by Dixon Telephone Company, Lexcom Telephone Company, and Citizens Telephone Company of Higginsville, Missouri, ARE GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin Chief Wireline Competition Bureau Dixon Telephone Company, Petition for Waiver of Section 54.301 Local
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-484A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-484A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-484A1.txt
    • C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed by the State of Wyoming, Cheyenne, Wyoming, on December 20, 2002 and February 12, 2003, ARE DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j) and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-152 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291 and 1.3, that waiver of section 54.504(b) of the Commission's rules IS GRANTED to the State of Wyoming, Cheyenne, Wyoming, and the applications are REMANDED to SLD for further action consistent with this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin Chief Wireline Competition Bureau Request for Review by the State of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-487A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-487A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-487A1.txt
    • with the public interest to penalize Greenfield for its employee's sudden departure to fulfill his military obligations. We therefore grant the Waiver Request and remand the underlying applications to the Administrator. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 54.722(a) and pursuant to the authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Greenfield Public School District, Shutesbury, Massachusetts, on October 12, 2005, IS GRANTED, and the underlying applications ARE REMANDED to the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-4A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-4A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-4A1.txt
    • S2666, at the 21� E.L. orbital location, to provide a telemetry signal with a center frequency of 1491.7 MHz, and an allocated bandwidth of 500 kHz, transmitted using right-hand circular polarization, and to operate its telecommand links with center frequencies of 7073 and 7074 MHz and an allocated bandwidth of 1 MHz. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, AfriSpace, Inc. IS GRANTED a waiver of Sections 25.156 and 25.157 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 25.156, 25.157, to the extent necessary to enable the Bureau to consider its AfriStar-2 application on a first-come, first-served basis as set forth in Section 25.158 of the Commission's rules, 47. C.F.R.� 25.158. IT
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-548A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-548A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-548A1.txt
    • its most recent filing in this proceeding, the February Supplement, Northeast states that WLKC(FM) ``continues to be described by Arbitron as being in the [Burlington Metro]'' such that Northeast controls 6 stations in that Metro. See February Supplement at 1. January Supplement at 1. Waiver Request at 2. 418 F.2d 1153, 1157-59 (D.C. Cir. 1969)). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (stating that rule provisions may be waived "for good cause shown"). The Commission declined to adopt any specific waiver criteria relating to radio station ownership in the Ownership Order, but stated that ``[p]arties who believe that the particular facts of their case warrant a waiver of the local radio ownership rule may seek a waiver under the general `good cause'
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-603A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-603A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-603A1.txt
    • Verizon's provision of customer notification and certification to the Commission that complies with all requirements of section 64.1120(e), except the 30-day periods waived herein. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.141, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Verizon New York, Inc., on February 17, 2006, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Erica H. McMahon, Chief Consumer Policy Division Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau See 2000 Biennial Review-Review
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-643A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-643A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-643A1.txt
    • 2006 filing, while allowing the Commission to consider the Companies' request for a non-substantive amendment to section 64.904 on a less time-sensitive basis. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), and 220 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 220, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, that section 64.904 of the Commission's rules IS WAIVED to the extent provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Donald K. Stockdale, Jr. Associate Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau We note that the April 1 deadline falls on a Saturday this year. Accordingly, carriers must file the biennial audit report on or before
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-644A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-644A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-644A1.txt
    • at 13808-09. 47 C.F.R. � 73.3555, Note 4. Application, Exhibit 5 at 6. Id. at 4. WAIT Radio v. F.C.C., 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (``WAIT Radio''). See Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v F.C.C., 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (citing WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1157-59). WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1157. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (rule may be waived ``for good cause shown'') (cited in Ownership Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 13747). 47 C.F.R. � 73.3555, Note 4 (emphasis added). Id., 18 FCC Rcd at 13810. Id., 18 FCC Rcd at 13809. See 5 U.S.C. �� 551(5), 553. See also McLouth Steel Products Corp. v. Thomas, 838 F.2d 1317 (D.C. Cir. 1988) (agency generally may
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-649A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-649A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-649A1.txt
    • to serve copies in accordance with these rules as stated herein. III. ORDERING CLAUSE 14. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4 (i) and (j), 201-209, of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i) and (j), 201-209, this order is HEREBY ADOPTED as described above. 15. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commissions rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, section 61.49(k) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 61.49(k), IS WAIVED for the purpose specified in paragraph 4 supra. 16. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, sections 1.4(f) and 1.773(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.4(f), 1.773(b) ARE
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-6A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-6A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-6A1.txt
    • Region 2. In ITU Region 2, which includes the United States, the 12.25-12.7 GHz frequency band is allocated on a primary basis to BSS and FS. There is no allocation for FSS in this band in ITU Region 2. Therefore, PanAmSat's use of this band in ITU Region 2 for FSS requires a waiver of the Table of Allocations. Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules authorizes the Commission to waive its rules for ``good cause shown.'' Waiver is appropriate only if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule and such deviation would better serve the public interest than would strict adherence to the general rule. Generally, the Commission may grant a waiver of its rules in a particular case
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-73A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-73A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-73A1.txt
    • areas. Accordingly, we find that waiving section 54.802(a) of the Commission's rules will serve the public interest by preserving and advancing universal service. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.802(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.802(a), filed by Valor Telecommunications of Texas, L.P., on December 23, 2004 IS GRANTED, as described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Valor Telecommunications of Texas, L.P., Request for
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-785A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-785A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-785A1.txt
    • here, we reserve the right to conduct audits and investigations to determine compliance with the program rules and requirements. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by the Illinois School for the Visually Impaired IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-914A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-914A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-914A1.txt
    • report addressing its progress and indicating when it expects to resume compliance with these requirements. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5, 201, 214(a), 251(c)(5), 271, 272, and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155, 201, 214(a), 251(c)(5), 271, 272, and 303(r) and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 51.325-51.335 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 51.325-51.335 AT&T's Petition IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau In response to Hurricane Katrina, the Commission established an independent panel to review the impact of Hurricane Katrina on the telecommunications and media infrastructure and make recommendations to the Commission regarding ways
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-924A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-924A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-924A1.txt
    • the information required by section 64.4002(a)(7) and (c) in some other manner and in a timely fashion. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1-4, 201, 202, 222, 258, and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154, 201, 202, 222, 258, and 303(r), and the authority delegated under sections 0.141, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, the Petition for an Expedited Interim Waiver relating to 47 C.F.R. � 64.4002(a)(7) and (c), filed by Mid America Computer Corporation on November 21, 2005, IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Monica Desai Chief, Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau Rules and Regulations Implementing Minimum Customer Account
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-930A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-930A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-930A1.txt
    • No. 06-91 (filed April 21, 2006) (Applicants Apr. 21, 2006 Letter)). Applicants are also filing applications for transfer of control associated with authorization for international services. Any action on this domestic 214 application is without prejudice to Commission action on other related, pending applications. 47 C.F.R. � 63.03(b)(2)(i). Interest holder is a retirement and health benefit pension fund with over 1.3 million members and assets of over $150 billion. Interest holder is the largest public teacher pension organization, with more than 600,000 members and assets of over $88 billion. SAM holds voting rights for outstanding shares that are otherwise owned by other entities for whom SAM acts as an investment advisor. None of the other owners of outstanding shares of Level
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-944A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-944A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-944A1.txt
    • to cost-based status, is required to calculate its jurisdictional separations factors pursuant to the Separations Freeze Order and the Commission's rules. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze as codified in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Partner Communications Cooperative and Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc. on June 14, 2004, IS CONDITIONALLY GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-946A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-946A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-946A1.txt
    • Accordingly, Lost Nation is required to recalculate its jurisdictional separations factors pursuant to the Separations Freeze Order and the Commission's rules. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze as codified in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Lost Nation-Elwood Telephone Company and Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc. on October 24, 2006, IS CONDITIONALLY GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-955A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-955A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-955A1.txt
    • from AM Station WNLR. Therefore, we grant Petitioner's reallotment proposal. 4. Consistent with the technical requirements of the Commission's Rules, Channel 292A can be allotted to Marlinton, West Virginia, utilizing coordinates of 38-13-24 NL and 80-05-41WL, and Channel 291A can be allotted to Keswick, Virginia, utilizing coordinates of 38-01-48 NL and 78-22-55 WL, with a site restriction of 2.1 kilometers (1.3 miles) northwest of Keswick. 5. The Commission will send a copy of this Report and Order in a report to be sent to Congress and the Government Accountability Office pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A). 6. Accordingly, pursuant to the authority contained in 47 U.S.C. Sections 4(i), 5(c)(1), 303(g) and (r) and 307(b) and 47 C.F.R.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.txt
    • in the MF and HF bands, administrations shall: 1.1 make assignments in the bands allocated to the fixed and mobile services; 1.2 not make assignments in the bands: - allocated exclusively to the maritime or aeronautical mobile (R) services; - shared on a co-primary basis with the broadcasting service, radiodetermination service or the amateur services; - allocated to radio astronomy; 1.3 avoid use which may affect frequency assignments involving safety services made in accordance with Nos. 5.155, 5.155A and 5.155B; 1.4 take into account any footnotes applicable to the proposed bands and the implications regarding compatibility; 2 that frequency adaptive systems shall automatically limit simultaneous use of frequencies to the minimum necessary for communication requirements; 3 that, with a view to
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-103A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-103A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-103A1.txt
    • containing [sic] additional telecommunications capabilities. Each mobile computer is customized to meet the business requirements and applications of Hand Held Products' specific customers.'' Hand Held Request at 3. Id. Id. at 3-4. Id. at 6. Id. at 7. Id. at 5. Id. at 5-6. Id. at 6. Id. at 8. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.2. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). Id. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 ��`��gd�r % & � � h�r ��`��gd�r ��PNG r v ��"r�9 I'6� �d�Y�͆aX ���; Wh� �X,�aX���y�]\\.W`h���va6l! �v"]�V�at�������-``````�"m(c)x<��G�<���={-N��J%t�<== �"""x ҍ� � ��(c)���!��'' �R)&� �A�� "���\��v`` � 6� ��
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-10A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-10A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-10A1.txt
    • rejected a petition for reconsideration by GUSA seeking to extend the NGSO MSS feeder downlink from 6700-7025 MHz to 6700-7075 MHz. Having failed to persuade the Commission in the context of the rulemaking, GUSA now seeks a waiver of the Table of Allocations to permit it to use non-grandfathered earth stations to receive transmissions in the 7025-7055 MHz band. Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules authorizes the Commission to waive its rules for ``good cause shown.'' Waiver is appropriate only if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule and such deviation would better serve the public interest than would strict adherence to the general rule. Generally, the Commission may grant a waiver of its rules in a particular case
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-110A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-110A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-110A1.txt
    • advancing universal service. . We encourage filers to use any and all methods they deem necessary to ensure their filings are timely received. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.802(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.802(a), filed by NPCR Inc. IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.102 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.102, this Order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1120A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1120A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1120A1.txt
    • 2. We understand that all or most site notices (as well as registrations) will be filed online. See PCIA Ex Parte, filed Jan. 26, 2007, at 3; CTIA Ex Parte, filed Jan. 19, 2007, Attachment at 3. See CTIA Ex Parte, filed Dec. 7, 2006, at 2; PCIA Ex Parte, filed Dec. 21, 2006, at 2. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (any provision of the rules may be waived by the Commission on its own motion for good cause shown). We note that CTIA and PCIA have already agreed upon the specific data format and structure to be included in the exchange of site-notice data. See CTIA Ex Parte, filed October 19, 2006. See WCA comments at 3 (the process of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1177A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1177A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1177A1.txt
    • the schools and libraries support mechanism, provided all other E-rate application requirements are satisfied. We therefore grant the instant request for waiver. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the Waiver Petition filed by the Kentucky Department of Education, on April 22, 2005, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.102 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.102, this Order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1180A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1180A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1180A1.txt
    • to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. ordering clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Waiver of 47 C.F.R. �54.507 filed by the Petitioners as listed in the Appendix ARE GRANTED and REMANDED to USAC for further action consistent with the terms of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1182A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1182A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1182A1.txt
    • of the program and will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under our own procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 54.722(a), that Tri-Rivers Education Computer Association's Request for Review IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 1.3, and 54.722(a) of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1185A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1185A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1185A1.txt
    • circumstances'' that would justify a waiver of the Commission's general rule. Accordingly, we deny Otsego's Request for Waiver. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the Request for Waiver filed by the Otsego Local School District IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.102 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.102, this Order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-118A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-118A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-118A1.txt
    • that ANIK F3 will carry FM video TV signals only on transponders that have been coordinated for such use. Finally, Telesat states that the Commission waived Section 25.210(a)(3) with respect to three Telesat satellites in the past. The Commission may grant a waiver of its rules only if there is "good cause" for a waiver within the meaning of Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules. Generally, the Commission may grant a waiver of its rules in a particular case only if the relief requested would not undermine the policy objective of the rule in question, and would otherwise serve the public interest. We find that Telesat has shown good cause for a waiver of Section 25.210(a)(3) as conditioned in this Order.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-11A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-11A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-11A1.txt
    • rejected a petition for reconsideration by GUSA seeking to extend the NGSO MSS feeder downlink from 6700-7025 MHz to 6700-7075 MHz. Having failed to persuade the Commission in the context of the rulemaking, GUSA now seeks a waiver of the Table of Allocations to permit it to use non-grandfathered earth stations to receive transmissions in the 7025-7055 MHz band. Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules authorizes the Commission to waive its rules for ``good cause shown.'' Waiver is appropriate only if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule and such deviation would better serve the public interest than would strict adherence to the general rule. Generally, the Commission may grant a waiver of its rules in a particular case
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1217A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1217A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1217A1.txt
    • to a limited extension of the deadlines by which they were required to achieve 95% penetration among their subscribers of location-capable handsets. We therefore grant Petitioners' requests for further waiver, subject to the conditions and reporting requirements described herein. ordering clauses IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the ENHANCE 911 Act, Pub. L. No. 108-494, 118 Stat. 3986 (2004), and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the foregoing Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Request for Additional Limited Waiver and Extension of the Handset Penetration Deadline of the Commission's Phase II E911 Rules filed by South #5 RSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Brazos Cellular Communications, Ltd. IS GRANTED, nunc pro tunc, subject
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1235A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1235A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1235A1.txt
    • to do so. Accordingly, the Puerto Rico Board's request for clarification or, in the alternative, waiver is moot. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 154(j), and 254, and pursuant to delegated authority under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that this ORDER IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 154(j), and 254, and pursuant to delegated authority under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1236A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1236A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1236A1.txt
    • pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under our own procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed by Long Beach Unified School District on May 25, 2004; Smoky Hill Education Service Center on August 25, 2004; and Asociacion de Educacion Privada de Puerto Rico, on behalf of Advance Bilingual School, on February 10, 2005, are GRANTED and
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1238A1.txt
    • Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeals filed by the Petitioners as listed in the Appendix ARE DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the requests for waiver filed by the Petitioners as listed in the Appendix ARE DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.102 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.102, this Order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1239A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1239A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1239A1.txt
    • consumers living on or near reservations, as defined in 25 C.F.R. �� 20.1(r) and 20.1(v)); Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service; Promoting Deployment and Subscribership in Unserved and Underserved Areas, Including Tribal and Insular Areas, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 15 FCC Rcd 17122 (2000) (Tribal Stay Order and Further Notice); 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.429(k). See Twenty-Fifth Order on Reconsideration, Report and Order, Order, and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, CC Docket No. 96-45, Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 10985 (2003) (Twenty-Fifth Order on Reconsideration). See Comments of AT&T, SBC, United States Cellular Corporation (USCC), Verizon, and Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission (Washington UTC); Reply Comments of AT&T and USCC. See
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1269A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1269A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1269A1.txt
    • justify grant of a rule waiver. We therefore, deny the Petitioner's requests for waiver of the Commission's rules. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of sections 54.307(c), 54.802(a), and 54.903 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 54.307(c), 54.802(a), 54.903, filed by NPI-Omnipoint Wireless, LLC, the petition for waiver of section 54.802(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.802(a), filed by SEI Data, Inc., and the petition
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1270A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1270A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1270A1.txt
    • filed by Send Technologies, L.L.C., on January 19, 2004 and March 22, 2004 ARE DENIED and the underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further processing consistent with this Order. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1- 4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 54.722(a) and pursuant to the authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Waivers filed by Send Technologies, L.L.C. ARE DENIED and the underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further action consistent with this
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1272A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1272A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1272A1.txt
    • Acting Deputy Chief Wireline Competition Bureau AT&T Petition for Clarification or, in the Alternative, Waiver, CC Docket No. 02-6, filed July 21, 2003 (AT&T Petition); 47 C.F.R. � 54. 5414(a). Section 1.429 of the Commission's rules provides that any person may petition for reconsideration of a final action in a proceeding conducted under this subpart. 47 C.F.R. � 1.429. Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules allows the Commission to waive any provision of its rules for good cause. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. AT&T Petition at 1-2. Because we grant AT&T's petition for clarification, we do not address its request, in the alternative, for a waiver of section 54.514(a) of the Commission's rules. AT&T Petition at 1; 47 C.F.R. � 54.514(a); Schools
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1282A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1282A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1282A1.txt
    • flexibility for advanced services in areas where it already has qualified for pricing flexibility for special access services by satisfying the applicable competitive triggers. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1, 2, 4(i), 4(j), and 201-205 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 152, 154(i), 154(j), 201-205, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, the Pricing Flexibility Order requirement that a service must be in price caps before it is eligible for pricing flexibility IS WAIVED with respect to the advanced services offered under AT&T Inc.'s local exchange
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1302A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1302A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1302A1.txt
    • of Section 64.1903 of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No. 00-175, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 16 FCC Rcd 17270 (2001) (Structural Separation Notice)). See Structural Separation Notice, 16 FCC Rcd at 17273, para. 8. See Structural Separation Further Notice, 18 FCC Rcd at 10934-36, paras. 41-43. The Commission may waive its rules when good cause is demonstrated. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (WAIT Radio), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972). The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. See Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). In
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1303A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1303A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1303A1.txt
    • waiver of the December 30, 2002, line count filing deadline established in section 54.307(c) of the Commission's rules. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.313(d) and 54.307(c) of the Commission's rules, filed by Corr Wireless Communications, LCC, IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.102 of the Commission's
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-130A1.txt
    • prevention hotline. Therefore, we do not find that an emergency reassignment is necessary for the other toll-free numbers requested by SAMHSA and deny the request with respect to those numbers. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i) and 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), and 251(e), sections 1.3 and 52.111 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 52.111, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91 and 0.291, that McLeodUSA Telecommunications Services, Inc. port the toll-free numbers 1-800-784-2433 (1-800-SUICIDE), 1-877-784-2432 (1-877-SUICIDA), and 1-888-784-2433 (1-888-SUICIDE), to the Responsible Organization chosen by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1332A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1332A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1332A1.txt
    • and will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review and/or Requests for Waiver filed by Calhoun School, New York, New York, on November 23, 2004; North American Family Institute, Danvers, Massachusetts, on August 24, 2004; North Sacramento School District, Sacramento, California, on December 7, 2005; Harrisonburg City School Board, on
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1354A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1354A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1354A1.txt
    • thus, an applicant has no guarantee that a multi-year contract will continue to be funded for the duration of the contract. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 that the Petition for Waiver filed by Sprint Corporation on February 3, 2004, IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.102 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.102, this Order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1361A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1361A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1361A1.txt
    • 25.112(a)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �25.112(a)(1), and Section 0.261 of the Commission's rules on delegations of authority, 47 C.F.R. �0.261, we dismiss the above-captioned applications without prejudice to refiling. Sincerely, Scott A. Kotler Chief, Systems Analysis Branch Satellite Division International Bureau 1574.4-1576.443 MHz band. 3629.4-3631.443 and 6454.397-6456.443 MHz bands. 1545.8-1548.0 MHz band. 6440.8-6443.0 MHz band. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (WAIT Radio); Northeast Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). See Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1159. See also Onsat Petition for Waiver to Permit Routine Licensing of 3.7 Meter Transmit and Receive Stations at C-Band,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1483A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1483A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1483A1.txt
    • pursuant to sections 1, 4 (i) and (j), 201-209, of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i) and (j), 201-209, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91 and 0.291, this order is HEREBY ADOPTED as described above. 14. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commissions rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, section 61.49(k) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 61.49(k), IS WAIVED for the purpose specified in paragraph 4 supra. 15. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, sections 1.4(f) and 1.773(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.4(f), 1.773(b) ARE
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1504A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1504A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1504A1.txt
    • provides wholesale voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) services, and retail traditional and virtual prepaid calling cards. Id. at 13. Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Association v. FPC, 259 F.2d 921, 925 (D.C. Cir. 1958). Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission v. Holiday Tours, Inc., 559 F.2d 841, 843 (D.C. Cir. 1977). Stay Petition at 34. Id. at 35. See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (Agency rules ``may be waived by the Commission on its own motion or on petition if good cause therefore is shown.''); United Gas Improvement Co. v. Caller Properties, Inc., 382 U.S. 223, 229 (1965) (``An agency, like a court, can undo what is wrongfully done by virtue of its order.''). See Boston Edison Co. v. FPC, 557 F.2d 845, 849
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1532A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1532A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1532A1.txt
    • grants and the Commission's decision to allow newly designated ETCs to receive support of the carrier's designation date. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.904(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.904(d), filed by Cellular South Licenses, Inc. IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.102 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.102,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1564A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1564A2.txt
    • edge-of-coverage signal level assumed by OET-69, even without adding any interference, and a few TVs would produce no picture at all at this signal level. Among those receivers, the TV with the least UHF sensitivity required an input signal level about 2.6 dB larger than the -84 dBm level, while the most sensitive TV could operate at a signal level 1.3 dB weaker than -84 dBm. The spread between the most-sensitive and least- sensitive receivers was larger in the VHF band-as high as 15 dB. If, in order to accommodate relatively insensitive receivers, a relatively high desired signal level is chosen as the measurement basis for rules to prevent interference to television, the resulting rules for a new service might permit
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1565A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1565A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1565A1.txt
    • of the following events: one month after the ILEC has made the necessary upgrades to its equipment to support wireless-to-wireless LNP, or six months from the release date of this Order. V. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i) and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 155(c), and sections 1.3 and 52.31(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 52.31(d), the petitions for waiver and extension of time to implement wireless-to-wireless porting filed by GTE Pacifica, Inc., on June 30, 2006, Choice Phone, LLC on June 30, 2006, and Guam Wireless Telephone Co., LLC on June 28, 2006 are DENIED as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1600A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1600A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1600A1.txt
    • waiver of section 69.605(c) of the Commission's rules so that it may remain under average schedule status. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and the authority delegated by sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze as codified in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by SRT Communications, Inc. and North Dakota Telephone Company on October 2, 2006, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i),
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1800A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1800A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1800A1.txt
    • for pricing flexibility, Qwest may, in a subsequent proceeding, apply for Phase II pricing flexibility for advanced services by satisfying the applicable competitive triggers. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1, 2, 4(i), 4(j), and 201-205 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 152, 154(i), 154(j), 201-205, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, the Pricing Flexibility Order requirement that a service must be in price caps before it is eligible for pricing flexibility IS WAIVED with respect to the advanced services offered through Section 8 of Qwest's
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1946A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1946A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1946A1.txt
    • Clarity's waiver requests. Fifteen comments and six reply comments were received. Generally, commenters representing broadcast interests oppose Clarity's request, claiming that it could cause harmful interference to their BAS/ENG operations. On the other hand, commenters representing children's groups claim that Clarity's proposal to publicize Amber Alerts and provide other information regarding missing persons could help save lives. Discussion Under Section 1.3 of its rules, the Commission may grant waiver requests when ``good cause'' exists to do so. Clarity points to the waiver standard established for Wireless Services in support of its waiver request. Under Section 1.925(b)(3) of the Commission's rules, ``good cause'' exists where (1) the underlying purpose of the rule(s) would not be served or would be frustrated by application
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-198A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-198A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-198A1.txt
    • a waiver of 47 C.F.R. � 15.511 to permit its QUPID transmitter to operate at at a peak EIRP of 40 dBm/50 MHz and at the following RMS average EIRP emission levels: Frequency Band in MHz UWB RMS Limit (dBm/MHz) Requested Emission Limit (dBm/MHz) Increase above UWB Limits (dB) 960-1160 -53.3 -45 8.3 1160-1500 -53.3 -47 6.3 1500-1610 -53.3 -52 1.3 1610-1900 -51.3 -47 4.3 1900-1990 -51.3 -35 16.3 1990-2115 -41.3 -24 17.3 2115-2600 -41.3 -20 21.3 2600-2700 -41.3 -30 11.3 2700-3650 -41.3 -26.3 15 3650-3800 -41.3 -41.3 0 3800-4000 -41.3 -39.3 2 4000-10500 -41.3 -41.3 0 Above 10500 -51.3 -51.3 0 The CWCEC petition was placed on notice for public comment. Comments and replies were received from ARINC Incorporated, et
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2008A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2008A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2008A1.txt
    • relief would offset the higher infrastructure costs associated with low-density systems. discussion Charter makes its request for waiver pursuant to Section 629(c) of the Act and Sections 76.7 and 76.1207 of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, we analyze its request pursuant to the waiver standards set forth in Section 629(c) as well as under the general waiver provisions found in Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's rules. In addition, because Charter characterizes its request as one for ``low-cost, limited capability'' devices as described in the Commission's 2005 Deferral Order, we evaluate it under that waiver policy, as well. As discussed below, and consistent with the Bureau's conclusions in the January 10 Orders, we find that we cannot grant Charter's request for
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2009A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2009A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2009A1.txt
    • Specifically, OneSource seeks a waiver of the integration ban until December 31, 2007, for the Motorola DCT-700 and DCT-3416 integrated digital cable set-top boxes (``DCT-700'' and ``DCT-3416,'' respectively), which OneSource argues are critical to its plans to migrate to an all-digital network by December 31, 2007. For the reasons stated below, we conditionally grant OneSource's Waiver Request pursuant to Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's rules with respect to deployment of the DCT-700, but deny its request to continue deployment of the DCT-3416. BACKGROUND A. Section 629 of the Act Section 629(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), requires the Commission to: adopt regulations to assure the commercial availability, to consumers of multichannel video programming and
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2010A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2010A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2010A1.txt
    • the Media Bureau the above-captioned request for waiver (the ``Waiver Request'') of the ban on integrated set-top boxes set forth in Section 76.1204(a)(1) of the Commission's rules. Specifically, GCI seeks a waiver of the integration ban for all new set-top boxes issued after July 1, 2007. For the reasons stated below, we partially grant GCI's Waiver Request pursuant to Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's rules, subject to the conditions set forth herein. BACKGROUND Section 629(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), requires the Commission to: adopt regulations to assure the commercial availability, to consumers of multichannel video programming and other services offered over multichannel video programming systems, of converter boxes, interactive communications equipment, and other
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2016A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2016A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2016A1.txt
    • 1.2107(b) of the Commission's rules requires that, within ten business days after release of the auction closing notice, each winning bidder submit sufficient funds (in addition to its upfront payment) to bring its total amount of money on deposit with the Commission for its winning bids to twenty percent of the net amount of its winning bids. Pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, we may waive rule provisions ``for good cause shown'' by the petitioner. As interpreted by the courts, in a request for waiver of a Commission rule, the requesting party must demonstrate that ``special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule and such deviation will serve the public interest.'' In order to demonstrate the required special
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2037A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2037A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2037A1.txt
    • not warrant an extension of time to complete construction. 47 C.F.R. � 1.946(e)(2)-(3). See Amendment of the Commission's Rules to Establish New Personal Communications Services, GEN Docket No. 90-314, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 9 FCC Rcd. 4957, 5019 (1994) (PCS MO&O), citing WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969). 47 C.F.R. � 1.925. Alternatively, pursuant to section 1.3, the Commission has authority to waive its rules if there is ``good cause'' to do so. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990). The Commission has used this basic definition of ``substantial service'' in a number of commercial wireless services. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. � 24.103(d). Because the requirement
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2043A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2043A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2043A1.txt
    • to our Part 61 rules is sufficient to address the concerns raised by the NJ Rate Counsel concerning the effects of the waiver on the 2007 annual filing and the information available to assess those effects. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 201-205 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 201-205, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, section 61.42(g) of the Commission's rules IS WAIVED for TIPToP services offered by AT&T with respect to AT&T's 2007 annual access tariff filing requirements under section 61.43 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2082A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2082A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2082A1.txt
    • in this Order on Hawaiian Telcom's request for waiver of sections 43.21(g) and 43.21(j) of the Commission's rules as they relate to Hawaiian Telcom's 2007 ARMIS Report 43-05 and its 2007 ARMIS Report 43-08, both of which will be due on April 1, 2008. Granting Hawaiian Telcom's request for waiver of its 2006 ARMIS filing requirements is consistent with section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, which permits the Commission to waive any of its rules when particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. Hawaiian Telcom's Petition does not, however, present circumstances sufficient to warrant a waiver of its 2007 ARMIS filing requirements at this time. BACKGROUND On May 2, 2005, Verizon Communications (``Verizon'') closed its sale of Verizon
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2111A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2111A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2111A1.txt
    • a denial based on a complete review and analysis no later than 90 calendar days from release of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to the authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, section 54.504(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.504(c), IS WAIVED as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.102 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.102, this Order SHALL BE
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2150A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2150A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2150A1.txt
    • � 19; NPTC Nov. 23, 2005 Letter. See Implementation of Section 703(e) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996; Amendment of the Commission's Rules and Policies Governing Pole Attachments, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 6777, 6788-89, � 19 (1998) (rejecting pole owners' proposal to impose a statute of limitations on pole attachment complaints) (subsequent history omitted). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (``Any provision of the rules may be waived by the Commission on its own motion or on petition if good cause therefor is shown.''). Reply at 19-20; Reply, Declaration of Loren Salsgiver, Chief Executive Officer of Salsgiver Telecom, at 2, �� 3, 4. See, e.g., Implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Amendment of Rules Governing Procedures to be Followed
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-222A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-222A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-222A1.txt
    • condition of Virtual Geo's license. A request to change a license condition must be made in application to modify the license. Given the timing of this matter, we will treat Virtual Geo's request as a modification application, and refer the matter to the Office of the Managing Director for the appropriate billing. See January 18 Letter at 2. See Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (WAIT Radio); Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. See also Comsat Corporation, Petition for Partial Relief from the Current Regulatory Treatment of Comsat World Systems' Switched
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-222A1_Erratum.doc
    • condition of Virtual Geo's license. A request to change a license condition must be made in application to modify the license. Given the timing of this matter, we will treat Virtual Geo's request as a modification application, and refer the matter to the Office of the Managing Director for the appropriate billing. See January 18 Letter at 2. See Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (WAIT Radio); Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. See also Comsat Corporation, Petition for Partial Relief from the Current Regulatory Treatment of Comsat World Systems' Switched
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-234A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-234A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-234A1.txt
    • advancing universal service. . We encourage filers to use any and all methods they deem necessary to ensure their filings are timely received. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.802(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.802(a), filed by AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF NY AND AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.102 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2366A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2366A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2366A1.txt
    • to avoid the burdens associated with incorporating its Advanced Services into its price cap indices and converting the demand data from multiple sources (VADI, Verizon Hawaii, and Hawaiian Tariff FCC No. 2) for price cap calculations. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 201-205 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 201-205, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, section 61.42(g) of the Commission's rules IS WAIVED for Advanced Services in Hawaiian's Tariff FCC No. 2, only with respect to Hawaiian's 2007 annual access tariff filing requirements under section 61.43 of the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2367A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2367A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2367A1.txt
    • grant Verizon an extension of the limited waiver of section 61.42(g) for one additional year to exclude advanced services under Tariff FCC No. 20 from price caps for purposes of the 2007 annual access tariff filing. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 201-205 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 201-205, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, section 61.42(g) of the Commission's rules IS WAIVED for advanced services in Verizon's Tariff FCC No. 20, including those transferred from VADI to Verizon, only with respect to Verizon's 2007 annual access tariff
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-236A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-236A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-236A1.txt
    • advancing universal service. . We encourage filers to use any and all methods they deem necessary to ensure their filings are timely received. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of sections 54.313(d) and 54.314(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 54.313(d); 54.314(d), filed by the Kansas Corporation Commission IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.102 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.102,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-238A1.txt
    • waiver of this rule is in the public interest and is consistent with the Commission's amendment to section 54.317(d)(6) and previous waiver grants. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.314(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.314(d), filed by MTA Wireless Communications, Inc. d/b/a MTA IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.102 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.102, this
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-239A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-239A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-239A1.txt
    • of section 54.307. . We encourage filers to use any and all methods they deem necessary to ensure their filings are timely received. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.307 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.307, filed by Pine Cellular Phones Inc. IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.102 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.102, this Order SHALL
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-24A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-24A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-24A1.txt
    • comply with the DTV tuner requirement as set forth in Section 15.117(i) of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that pursuant to the authority contained in Sections 2(a), 4(i), and (j), 5(c), and 303 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 152(a), 154(i) and (j), 155(c), and 303 and Sections 0.31(j) and (m), 0.241(a)(3), and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.31(j) and (m), 0.241(a)(3), and 1.3, the Petition for Waiver submitted by Sumitomo Canada Limited IS GRANTED under authority delegated by the Commission as indicated herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Julius P. Knapp Chief Office of Engineering and Technology See Sumitomo Petition for Waiver (Sumitomo Petition), submitted September 8, 2006; see also 47 C.F.R.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-266A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-266A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-266A1.txt
    • 2, 2010, the waiver of the table of allocations and section 25.136(d) would not extend to communications with any replacement satellites without Commission authorization. Discussion. As noted above, in connection with its extension request, Amtech seeks a waiver of the priority and preemption requirements of Footnote US315 of the Table of Allocations and Section 25.136(d) of the Commission's rules. Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules authorizes the Commission to waive its rules for ``good cause shown.'' Waiver is appropriate only if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule and such deviation would better serve the public interest than would strict adherence to the general rule. Generally, the Commission may grant a waiver of its rules in a particular case
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2682A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2682A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2682A1.txt
    • is entitled to a limited extension of the deadline by which it was required to achieve 95% penetration among its subscribers of location-capable handsets. We therefore grant Five Star's Petition, subject to the conditions and reporting requirements described herein. ordering clauses IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the ENHANCE 911 Act, Pub. L. No. 108-494, 118 Stat. 3986 (2004), and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the foregoing Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Temporary Waiver or Temporary Stay by Texas RSA 15B2 Limited Partnership d/b/a Five Star Wireless IS GRANTED, subject to the conditions and reporting requirements specified herein. The deadline for compliance with Section 20.18(g)(1)(v) is December
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2758A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2758A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2758A1.txt
    • that the requested waiver be granted. This Order therefore grants Thomson's waiver request. As a result, Thomson may proceed with either TCB certification or Self-Declaration of Conformity pursuant to Part 68 of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.141 and 0.361 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the request for waiver of section 68.317(f) for Models 29578BE1-A and 29579BE1-A, filed by Thomson, Inc., IS GRANTED to the extent stated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: (1) the volume reset override switch shall be labeled as such and located
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2770A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2770A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2770A1.txt
    • and certification to the Commission that complies with all requirements of section 64.1120(e), except that the 30-day timeframes for doing so are waived herein. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.141, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Verizon California, Inc., on June 5, 2007, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Erica H. McMahon, Chief Consumer Policy Division Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau See 2000 Biennial Review-Review of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-283A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-283A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-283A1.txt
    • high site more than ten miles from the airport reduces the availability of these frequencies for secondary industrial/business users, which is contrary to the Commission's intent. Consequently, we deny the waiver request, and will dismiss WUL's application. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 1.3, 1.925, and 1.934 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, 1.934, the request for waiver filed on January 24, 2006, by Wireless US LLC, Inc. IS DENIED, and FCC File No. 0002457284 SHALL BE DISMISSED. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.131 and 0.331 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 0.131, 0.331. FEDERAL
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2893A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2893A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2893A1.txt
    • customers who have been displaced by the storm conditions in Kansas may desire to discontinue their service temporarily and to reinstate it at a later time. Due to the catastrophic nature of the damage to telecommunications systems in Kansas, we expect that in many cases these customers may seek to reinstate their service after the 90-day period has lapsed. Section 1.3 of our rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, authorizes the Commission to suspend, revoke, amend, or waive a Commission rule for good cause shown. Accordingly, we find that, in order to promote the maintenance and rebuilding of communities in storm ravaged areas and to facilitate continued access to telecommunications services for storm victims, it is in the public interest to waive
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2916A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2916A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2916A1.txt
    • its digital penetration will be slowed or halted, and the company will be unable to transition to all-digital services until downloadable security and the OpenCable Application Platform (``OCAP'') become available. Finally, Atlantic Broadband argues that if the Commission is for some reason reluctant to grant an across-the-board waiver for the STBs, it could alternatively grant limited waivers pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules. Atlantic Broadband suggests that these limited waivers would be applicable to small and medium-sized operators only, since these operators serve the price-sensitive low-density and rural areas that will be hit hardest by the application of the integration ban. Atlantic Broadband also requests that the Commission clarify that refurbished integrated boxes acquired on the used equipment market
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2917A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2917A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2917A1.txt
    • influence over monopoly venders. The delay in implementing [the integration ban], and the ensuing avalanche of waiver requests, has only added to the monopoly power of incumbent providers, the exact scenario that common reliance should have prevented.'' CEA asserts that GCL has stated no grounds for waiver under Section 629(c). CEA further argues that grant of a waiver under Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's rules ``would serve to ratify the nullification of FCC regulations by larger MSOs and their vendors,'' but if waiver is granted, it should be done with ``forward-looking obligations to assure compliance and the achievement of a national competitive market in `2-way' navigation devices rather than perpetual future renewal.'' III. Discussion GCL makes its request for
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2918A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2918A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2918A1.txt
    • in Section 76.1204(a)(1) of the Commission's rules on which Crosslake may no longer place in service integrated set-top boxes. Crosslake seeks to defer enforcement of the July 1, 2007 deadline until it receives delivery of set-top boxes it previously ordered which will comply with the integration ban. For the reasons stated below, we grant Crosslake's deferral request pursuant to Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's rules. BACKGROUND Section 629(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), requires the Commission to: adopt regulations to assure the commercial availability, to consumers of multichannel video programming and other services offered over multichannel video programming systems, of converter boxes, interactive communications equipment, and other equipment used by consumers to access multichannel
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2919A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2919A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2919A1.txt
    • that small operators could request deferral of the July 1, 2007 deadline if they could demonstrate that they have placed orders for compliant set-top boxes that will not be fulfilled in time for them to comply with the deadline. The Waiver Request Pursuant to Section 629(c) of the Communications Act, Section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, and Sections 1.3, 76.7, and 76.1207 of the Commission's rules, Massillon seeks a waiver of the integration ban to allow it to place into service integrated set-top boxes it will have in inventory after the July 1, 2007 deadline. Massillon states that it is a ``small, locally-run, family-owned'' cable operator with approximately 46,000 customers. Massillon explains that it invested approximately $1 million in
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2920A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2920A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2920A1.txt
    • waiver may be especially appropriate for the increasing number of small MVPDs that provide Internet Protocol television (``IPTV'') utilizing fiber or copper-based digital subscriber line (``DSL'') technology. discussion NCTA argues that its request ``satisfies the special waiver provision in Section 629(c) of the Communications Act and Section 76.1207 of the Commission's rules, as well as the general standards of Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's rules.'' Accordingly, we analyze its request pursuant to the waiver standards set forth in Section 629(c) as well as under the general waiver provisions found in Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's rules. As discussed below, we find that the request does not justify the grant of a waiver under either of these standards.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2921A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2921A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2921A1.txt
    • systems or will transition to all-digital systems by February 17, 2009. All seek a waiver of the integration ban, which they argue is necessary in order to make the transition or to continue to provide the high-quality video and related digital services over their all-digital distribution networks. For the reasons stated below, we grant the Waiver Requests pursuant to Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's rules. BACKGROUND A. Section 629 of the Act Section 629(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), requires the Commission to: adopt regulations to assure the commercial availability, to consumers of multichannel video programming and other services offered over multichannel video programming systems, of converter boxes, interactive communications equipment, and other equipment
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3055A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3055A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3055A1.txt
    • modification application was placed on Public Notice and no comments were filed. III. DISCUSSION For the reasons discussed below, we grant Intelsat North America's modification request and authorize Intelsat North America to operate the INTELSAT 709 in the 11.7-11.95 GHz frequency band, on a non-harmful interference basis, at the 85.15� E.L. location, subject to conditions listed below. Waiver requests. Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules authorizes the Commission to waive its rules for ``good cause shown.'' Waiver is appropriate only if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule and such deviation would better serve the public interest than would strict adherence to the general rule. Generally, the Commission may grant a waiver of its rules in a particular case
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-30A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-30A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-30A1.txt
    • 1.1, rounded; the second additional acceptable bid amount equals the minimum acceptable bid amount times one plus two times the bid increment percentage, rounded, or (minimum acceptable bid amount) * 1.2, rounded; the third additional acceptable bid amount equals the minimum acceptable bid amount times one plus three times the bid increment percentage, rounded, or (minimum acceptable bid amount) * 1.3, rounded; etc. The Commission will round the results of these calculations, as well as the calculations to determine the minimum acceptable bid amounts, using the Bureau's standard rounding procedures. For Auction No. 71, the Bureau proposed to use a bid increment percentage of ten percent to calculate the eight additional acceptable bid amounts. The Commission received no comment on this
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-323A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-323A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-323A1.txt
    • Amendment of the Commission's Rules to Establish New Personal Communications Services, GEN Docket No. 90-314, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 9 FCC Rcd 4957, 5019 (1994) (Commission would consider waiving the PCS construction requirements on a case-by-case basis where circumstances are unique and public interest served), citing WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969). Alternatively, pursuant to section 1.3, the Commission has authority to waive its rules if there is ``good cause'' to do so. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990). In addition, pursuant to sections 1.946(e) and 24.843(b) of the Commission's rules, an extension of time to complete construction may be granted if the licensee shows that
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-323A1_Erratum.doc
    • Amendment of the Commission's Rules to Establish New Personal Communications Services, GEN Docket No. 90-314, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 9 FCC Rcd 4957, 5019 (1994) (Commission would consider waiving the PCS construction requirements on a case-by-case basis where circumstances are unique and public interest served), citing WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969). Alternatively, pursuant to section 1.3, the Commission has authority to waive its rules if there is ``good cause'' to do so. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990). In addition, pursuant to sections 1.946(e) and 24.843(b) of the Commission's rules, an extension of time to complete construction may be granted if the licensee shows that
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3271A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3271A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3271A1.txt
    • and certification to the Commission that complies with all requirements of section 64.1120(e), except that the 30-day timeframes for doing so are waived herein. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.141, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Verizon California, Inc., on June 28, 2007, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Erica H. McMahon, Chief Consumer Policy Division Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau See 2000 Biennial Review-Review of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3286A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3286A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3286A1.txt
    • that the requested waiver be granted. This Order therefore grants Serene's waiver request. As a result, Serene may proceed with either TCB certification or Self-Declaration of Conformity pursuant to Part 68 of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.141 and 0.361 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the request for waiver of section 68.317(f) for Models HD-50, HD-50J, HD-50P, and HD-50S, filed by Serene Innovations, Inc., IS GRANTED to the extent stated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: (1) the volume reset override switch shall be labeled as
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3316A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3316A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3316A1.txt
    • waiver requests for set-top boxes that it concluded were not the ``low-cost, limited-capability'' set-top boxes that the Commission committed to exempt from the integration ban in the 2005 Deferral Order. The Waiver Requests and Comments Great Plains On May 9, 2007, Great Plains filed a request pursuant to Section 629(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Sections 1.3, 76.7, and 76.1207 of the Commission's rules, for waiver of the prohibition set forth in Section 76.1204(a)(1) of the Commission's rules on offering integrated digital cable set-top boxes after July 1, 2007. Great Plains limits its request to boxes that it deploys to its subscribers who receive one-way service, and seeks waiver until the earlier of: (i) the commercial availability
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3317A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3317A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3317A1.txt
    • systems by February 17, 2009. All seek a waiver of the integration ban, which they argue is necessary in order to make the transition or to continue to provide the high-quality video and related digital services over their all-digital distribution networks. For the reasons stated below, we grant the Waiver Requests subject to the conditions specified below pursuant to Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's rules. BACKGROUND A. Section 629 of the Act Section 629(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), requires the Commission to: adopt regulations to assure the commercial availability, to consumers of multichannel video programming and other services offered over multichannel video programming systems, of converter boxes, interactive communications equipment, and other equipment
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3318A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3318A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3318A1.txt
    • interpret this narrowly tailored exception in such a lenient manner. Based on the facts presented, Comsouth has failed to show that waiver is ``necessary'' here to assist in the ``development or introduction'' of new or improved services. Indeed, as we stated in the January 10 Orders, such an interpretation would effectively negate any rules adopted pursuant to Section 629(a). Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's Rules Comsouth also submitted the Waiver Request under the general waiver provision found in Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's rules. As stated above, Comsouth argues that waiver is justified because its vendor will not deliver compliant boxes before September 2007 and because Comsouth will not be able to compete with DBS providers. For
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3319A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3319A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3319A1.txt
    • Bureau denied ten waiver requests for set-top boxes that it concluded were not the ``low-cost, limited-capability'' set-top boxes that the Commission committed to exempt from the integration ban in the 2005 Deferral Order. The Waiver Request Pursuant to Section 629(c) of the Communications Act and Section 76.1207 of the Commission's rules, Section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's rules, and the 2005 Deferral Order, Innovative seeks a waiver of Section 76.1204(a)(1) to allow it to continue to deploy the integrated Motorola DCT-1000 (``DCT-1000'') and the Motorola DCT-2000 (``DCT-2000'') set-top boxes until December 31, 2009. Innovative states that it is a small cable operator serving approximately 15,251 subscribers on the island of St. Thomas-St.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3330A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3330A1.txt
    • study were flawed. For example, in addition to the tower on which W52BR was located, the submitted study considered only four other existing towers, located between 44 and 83 miles from the licensed Champaign site. Commission records show, however, that there are at least 17 registered towers within 45 miles of the licensed Champaign site, including towers used by W07DD (1.3 miles), WBXC-CA (6.2 miles), W39BH (6.6 miles), WCIA(TV) (8.7 miles), W65CZ (11 miles), WILL(TV) (21.1 miles) and WICD(TV) (22.8 miles). None of these towers were considered as part of Cohen's submitted study, as required by Commission policy that displacement facilities continue to serve the same area as the displaced facilities. In addition, the staff determined, using the engineering software and
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A2.txt
    • 16 TABLE 006 (continued) Q5. IN AN AVERAGE WEEK, HOW MUCH TIME DO YOU SPEND, IN TOTAL, WATCHING OR LISTENING TO CABLE OR SATELLITE TV CHANNELS? BASE: RESPONDENTS WHO SUBSCRIBE TO CABLE OR SATELLITE TV TOTAL =========== 26 HOURS TO LESS THAN 27 HOURS 0.0 27 HOURS TO LESS THAN 28 HOURS - 28 HOURS TO LESS THAN 29 HOURS 1.3 29 HOURS TO LESS THAN 30 HOURS - 30 HOURS TO LESS THAN 31 HOURS 4.2 31 HOURS TO LESS THAN 32 HOURS 0.0 32 HOURS TO LESS THAN 33 HOURS 0.1 33 HOURS TO LESS THAN 34 HOURS 0.1 DATA BASED UPON FEWER THAN 145 RESPONDENTS DO NOT MEET MINIMUM REPORTING STANDARDS AND ARE SUPPLIED FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
    • 15.5 30.6 26.5 -7.4 - -10.9 - Origination Angle 0.0 10.2 10.1 12.9 12.7 -2.8 - -2.6 - Live Angle 0.7 15.8 13.7 20.9 19.9 -5.1 - -6.2 - Content Angle 0.1 27.0 21.0 28.3 27.7 -1.2 - -6.7 - Origination Angle 0.1 13.1 15.0 7.8 11.3 5.3 + 3.7 + Live Angle 0.1 19.9 16.4 12.7 17.7 7.2 + -1.3 - Content Angle 0.1 13.1 30.8 20.4 26.2 -7.2 - 4.6 + Origination Angle 0.0 3.7 25.5 11.1 18.7 -7.3 - 6.9 + Live Angle 0.0 11.2 21.7 17.4 22.9 -6.2 - -1.2 - Content Angle 0.0 23.7 18.1 28.0 24.3 -4.3 - -6.2 - Origination Angle 0.0 16.6 14.6 23.1 18.6 -6.5 - -4.0 - Live Angle 0.0 17.7
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A7.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A7.txt
    • and Slant of Cross-Owned Stations Difference in Candidate Speaking Time Difference in Candidate Coverage Difference in Partisan Issue Coverage Difference in Poll Coverage Kerry vote percentage in DMA 0.1 (1.45) 0.1 (1.06) 0.7*** (2.79) 0.7** (2.38) 0.9* (1.72) 0.7 (1.30) 0.3* (1.80) 0.3* (1.93) Cross-owned newspaper -3.6 (0.77) -3.9 (0.77) -3.8 (0.52) -4.4 (0.58) -9.5 (0.80) -12.0 (0.97) -1.7 (0.83) -1.3 (0.68) Cross-owned radio 0.4 (0.15) 0.0 (0.01) 10.0 (1.39) 10.0 (1.37) -19.3 (1.03) -20.0 (1.07) -3.7 (0.85) -3.4 (0.80) Cross-owned radio and newspaper 2.7 (0.42) 4.2 (0.61) -1.0 (0.09) 0.6 (0.06) 36.0 (1.49) 39.6* (1.73) 0.5 (0.11) -0.6 (0.15) Other control variables Ownership and network controls Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Time and length of broadcast fixed
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3490A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3490A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3490A1.txt
    • �� 154(i), 309, and Section 101.1011(a) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 101.1011(a), that the request for finding of substantial service made by SpeedUSNY.com, L.P. on March 7, 2007, File No. 0002939453, IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 309 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 309, and Sections 1.3, 1.925, and 1.946 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, 1.946, that the Contingent Request for Waiver of Section 101.1011 of the Commission's Rules or, in the Alternative, Extension of Time to Construct, File No. 0002968483, filed by SpeedUSNY.com, L.P. on March 27, 2007 IS GRANTED to the extent indicated and is otherwise DENIED, and the time for
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3572A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3572A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3572A1.txt
    • to familiarize themselves with any applicable regulations so that they can ensure that their submissions are filed in a timely and complete manner. ordering clauseS Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291 and 1.3, that the Petition for Waiver of section 54.904(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.904(d), filed by Sagebrush Cellular, Inc., IS GRANTED to the extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.102 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3719A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3719A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3719A1.txt
    • its network; (3) the status of its coordination efforts with PSAPs for alternative 95% handset penetration dates; (4) its efforts to encourage customers to upgrade to location-capable handsets; and (5) the percentage of its customers with location-capable phones. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the ENHANCE 911 Act, Pub. L. No. 108-494, 118 Stat. 3986 (2004), and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the Request for Waiver of the 95% Location Capable Handset Penetration Requirement filed by Sagebrush Cellular, Inc. and Triangle Communication System, Inc. IS GRANTED, nunc pro tunc, subject to the reporting requirements specified herein. The deadline for compliance with Section 20.18(g)(1)(v) is June 28, 2007. IT IS FURTHER
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3957A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3957A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3957A1.txt
    • and Order referenced above has yet to be released. Therefore, out of an abundance of caution, and to prevent any confusion, we hereby waive the sunshine period prohibition, to the extent necessary, to allow parties to file reply comments and make ex parte presentations relating to questions raised in Section III.B. 3. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, Section 1.1203 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1203, IS WAIVED to the extent described above. 4. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.191 and 0.392 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.191, 0.392. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Derek K. Poarch Chief Public Safety and Homeland Security
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3993A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3993A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3993A1.txt
    • it need not pay an application fee. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1109(d). 47 C.F.R. � 25.112(a). 47 C.F.R. � 25.138(a)(6). ATCONTACT Modification Application, Schedule S at 5 - section 8, column I, J, and K. 47 C.F.R. � 25.114(d)(3). ATCONTACT Modification Application, Technical Appendix at 3. The Commission may waive its rules when good cause is demonstrated. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. ATCONTACT Communications, LLC, File No. SAT-MOD-20070309-00047 (ATCONTACT Modification Application) at 4, Technical Appendix at 1. ATCONTACT Modification Application, Schedule S at 1; S2-Operating Frequency Bands; S9- Space Station Channels. ATCONTACT Modification Application, Schedule S at 5, S8(d). ATCONTACT's safe flight profile analysis also refers to the 87� W.L. orbital location. ATCONTACT Modification Application, Technical Appendix at 26. ATCONTACT Modification Application,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3994A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3994A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3994A1.txt
    • 25.138(a)(6). ATCONTACT Modification Application, Schedule S at 5 - section 8, column I, J, and K. 47 C.F.R. � 25.114(d)(3). ATCONTACT Communications, LLC, File No. SAT-MOD-20070309-00048 (ATCONTACT Modification Application), Technical Appendix at 3; ATCONTACT Communications, LLC, File No. SAT-AMD-20070309-00049 (ATCONTACT Amended Application), Technical Appendix at 3. The Commission may waive its rules when good cause is demonstrated. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. ATCONTACT Amended Application, Technical Appendix at 3 (``45 Ka-band receive beams and 45 active beams will be used'') and Technical Appendix at 9 (``69 active transmit and 75 active receive beams for standard communication''). ATCONTACT Modification Application, Technical Appendix at 23, ATCONTACT Amended Application, Technical Appendix at 24. 47 C.F.R. � 25.283(c). Examples of databases that may be consulted include,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4079A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4079A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4079A1.txt
    • 1, 2007 deadline set forth in Section 76.1204(a)(1) of the Commission's rules on which date Baja Broadband may no longer place in service integrated set-top boxes. Baja Broadband seeks to defer enforcement of the July 1, 2007 deadline until it receives delivery of set-top boxes that will comply with the integration ban. For the reasons stated below, pursuant to Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's rules, we grant Baja Broadband's Deferral Request with respect to the Motorola DCT-6200 and Motorola DCT-6416 set-top boxes but deny its Deferral Request with respect to the Motorola DCT-700 and Motorola DCT-2500 set-top boxes. BACKGROUND Section 629(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), requires the Commission to: adopt regulations to assure
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4112A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4112A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4112A1.txt
    • that customers who have been displaced by the wildfires in California may desire to discontinue their service temporarily and to reinstate it at a later time. Due to the catastrophic nature of the damage to telecommunications systems in California, we expect that in many cases these customers may seek to reinstate their service after the 90-day period has lapsed. Section 1.3 of our rules authorizes the Commission to suspend, revoke, amend, or waive a Commission rule for good cause shown. Accordingly, we find that, in order to promote the maintenance and rebuilding of communities in wildfire-ravaged areas and to facilitate continued access to telecommunications services for wildfire victims, it is in the public interest to waive section 52.15(f)(ii) of the Commission's
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4177A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4177A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4177A1.txt
    • By the Chief, Public Safety & Homeland Security Bureau: On October 4, 2007, the Commission issued an Order on Reconsideration revising the emergency backup power rule set forth in Section 12.2 of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) and (j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. ��154(i) and (j), and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that the previously-adopted Section 12.2 in the Katrina Panel Order is suspended until publication in the Federal Register of the Order on Reconsideration in which the Commission adopted the amended Section 12.2. The effective date of this Order is the date upon which this Order is released by the Commission. This action
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4178A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4178A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4178A1.txt
    • For further information, please contact Dana Wilson, Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau, Disability Rights Office, at (202) 418-2247 (voice), (202) 418-7898 (TTY), or e-mail at Dana.Wilson@fcc.gov. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 1, 2, and 225 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 152, and 225, and Sections 0.141, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.316 & 1.3, this Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the VON Coalition Petition, USTelecom Petition, and Hamilton Petition are granted in part, and denied in part, as set forth herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED comments shall be filed within 30 days after publication of this item in the Federal
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4189A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4189A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4189A1.txt
    • the public interest because the rule requires PRTC to devote a high percentage of its spectrum (20.6 percent) to a dwindling number of analog-only subscribers (0.33 percent) and thereby prevents PRTC from offering higher-speed telecommunications services, island-wide. PRTC notes that its analog-only subscribers are ``fully protected by PRT[C]'s outreach and free handset offers.'' Finally, PRTC argues that pursuant to Section 1.3, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, good cause exists for waiver of the analog sunset requirement. Specifically, PRTC argues that the ``special circumstances'' of the instant case warrant a waiver and that the public interest would be served. Discussion. A waiver of the Commission's rules may be granted if it is shown that the underlying purpose of the rule(s) would not be
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-431A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-431A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-431A1.txt
    • first responders. We thus are denying the requested waiver and dismissing the related applications without prejudice to Florida filing new applications for offset channels that comport with Section 90.621(b) of the Commission's rules. Ordering clause IT IS ORDERED pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 303(r), and Sections 0.392, 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.392, 1.3, 1.925, that the Requests for Waiver to Operate on 12.5 kHz Offset Channels filed by the State of Florida on March 1, 2005 and March 2, 2005, in association with FCC File Nos. 0002066133 and 0002063445, ARE DENIED, and the applications, FCC File Nos. 0002066133 and 0002063445 ARE DISMISSED.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4367A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4367A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4367A1.txt
    • payment of $205,500 has already been deducted from the upfront payment it deposited with the Commission to participate in Auction No. 37, it owes no further payment to the Commission. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED pursuant to Sections 4(i), 303(r), and 309(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 303(r), and 309(j), and Sections 1.3 and 1.1204(g)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 1.1204(g)(1), that the Request for Waiver filed by Advance Acquisitions, Inc., on November 20, 2006, IS GRANTED, and the Amended Request for Waiver filed by Advance Acquisitions, Inc., on May 22, 2007, IS GRANTED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED pursuant to Sections 4(i), 303(r), and 309(j) of the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4389A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4389A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4389A1.txt
    • Order, 5 FCC Rcd 3712 (1990) (waiver of minimum spacing rules for applicant to construct a new commercial FM station, where short-spacing was under a mile and served the public interest by avoiding potentially serious environmental problems at fully spaced sites); See also R&L Broadcasters, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 7 FCC Rcd 5551, 5552 (1992) (waiver to permit short-spacing of 1.3 miles, approximately one percent of the required spacing, in rugged mountain range where interference to short-spaced station was unlikely). See WREL, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 68 FCC2d 1043 (1978), aff'd, 45 R.R. 2d 319 (1979) (waiver of former radio contour overlap rule for overlap of 8.1 sq. miles with 185 people, with area of overlap comprising 2 percent of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4394A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4394A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4394A1.txt
    • - and an explanation of why C&CC has chosen the compliance efforts it has chosen. We emphasize that irrespective of the relief we grant in this Order, we fully expect C&CC to achieve compliance as quickly as possible. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the ENHANCE 911 Act, Pub. L. No. 108-494, 118 Stat. 3986 (2004), and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the Petition for Extension of Waiver filed by Cable & Communications Corporation IS GRANTED IN PART, subject to the conditions and reporting requirements specified herein. The deadline for compliance with Section 20.18(g)(1)(v) is April 26, 2008. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.191 and
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4395A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4395A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4395A1.txt
    • that the requested waiver be granted. This Order therefore grants Geemarc's waiver request. As a result, Geemarc may proceed with either TCB certification or Self-Declaration of Conformity pursuant to Part 68 of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.141 and 0.361 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the request for waiver of section 68.317(f) for Models Geemarc Ampli 200+, Geemarc Clearsound 200+, Geemarc CLEARVIEW 200+, and Geemarc 200+, filed by Geemarc Telecom International Ltd., IS GRANTED to the extent stated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: (1) the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4396A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4396A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4396A1.txt
    • that the requested waiver be granted. This Order therefore grants Clarity's waiver request. As a result, Clarity may proceed with either TCB certification or Self-Declaration of Conformity pursuant to Part 68 of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.141 and 0.361 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the request for waiver of section 68.317(f) for Models C4220, C4230, and C4230HS, filed by Clarity, A Division of Plantronics, Inc., IS GRANTED to the extent stated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: (1) the volume reset override switch shall be
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4510A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4510A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4510A1.txt
    • 303 (1999); 47 C.F.R � 1.80(b)(4), note to paragraph (b)(4), Section I. A broadcast station requires an authorization from the Commission to operate. See 47 U.S.C. � 301. 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(2)(D); see also Forfeiture Policy Statement, 12 FCC Rcd at 17100-01; 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(4); 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(4), note to paragraph (b)(4), Section II. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; Northeast Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (``[W]aiver is appropriate . . . if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule and such deviation will serve the public interest''); WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969). See also 1998 Biennial Regulatory Review -- Streamlining of Mass Media Applications,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-455A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-455A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-455A1.txt
    • program was meant ``to promote the deployment of wireless telecommunications services to tribal lands with little or no access to telecommunications service.'' Id. at 11799 � 14. See Division Letter at 1-3. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.2110(f)(3)(i); see also discussion supra note 7. See Petition at 4, citing 47 C.F.R. � 1.925. See Petition at 4, citing 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See Petition at 4. See Petition at 4-5. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 07-455 Federal Communications Commission DA 07-455 h h �@��� �@��� �@��� �@��� � `` '' � � � � � � � � � � � h h h h� h h � F � � � 0 � �
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-459A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-459A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-459A1.txt
    • of 1988. We find that Hopi's certification satisfies the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, as codified in sections 1.2001-1.2003 of the Commission's rules. ordering clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 214(e)(6) of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. � 214(e)(6), and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), Hopi Telecommunications, Inc. IS DESIGNATED AN ELIGIBLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIER, effective as of June 1, 2006, for portions of its licensed service area on the Hopi and Navajo Nation Reservations in Arizona, to the extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i),
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4723A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4723A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4723A1.txt
    • MSV-1. Id.at �25. Such a waiver would have allowed MSV to commence ATC operation more than a year before launching MSV-1 without having to construct a duplicate of its obsolete first-generation satellite. Policy Branch Information, Satellite Space Applications Accepted for Filing, Report No. SAT-00449 (June 8, 2007). Comments on Application for Limited Waiver, filed July 9, 2007. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See Northeast Cellular Telephone Co., LP v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990) and WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969). Application for Limited Waiver, Exhibit 2. See 47 C.F.R. �� 25.143(b)(iii) and 25.149(b)(1)(ii) (requiring fulltime coverage of the fifty states, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-476A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-476A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-476A1.txt
    • Request at 2. According to the Receiver, at least 2,400 investors had invested in the alleged scam, which included more than 40 corporations, limited liability companies, partnerships, and individuals. FCC File No. 0002010595, Exhibit 1, Request for Waiver of Section 95.833 or, in the Alternative, for Extension of Time to Construct (Request). 47 C.F.R. � 1.925. Alternatively, pursuant to section 1.3, the Commission has authority to waive its rules if there is ``good cause'' to do so. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.946(e). See id. at � (e)(2)-(3). Waiver Request at 2. Id. Waiver Request at 2. Waiver Request at 5. Id. 47 C.F.R. �
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-477A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-477A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-477A1.txt
    • to U.S. Telemetry, Nedder has ``expended or committed approximately $468,000 for the 218-219 MHz Service system'' and over $1 million for other associated costs. Id. at 2-3. Id. at 4. U.S. Telemetry adds that it has explored alternative means that would allow timely construction but has ``simply run out of time.'' Id. 47 C.F.R. � 1.925. Alternatively, pursuant to section 1.3, the Commission has authority to waive its rules if there is ``good cause'' to do so. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.946(e). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.946(e)(2)-(3). Waiver Request at 5. The Commission has afforded 218-219 MHz service licensees substantial relief from its regulatory
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-479A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-479A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-479A1.txt
    • 18, 2007, for additional time to meet the five-year construction requirement for its multilateration Location and Monitoring Service Economic Area licenses, File Nos. 0002882775 - 0002882779, IS GRANTED, and that the construction deadline is HEREBY EXTENDED until July 14, 2009. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 1.3, 1.925, 1.946 and 90.155(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, 1.946, 90.155(d), that FCR, Inc., BE GRANTED additional time to meet the ten-year construction requirement for multilateration Location and Monitoring Service Economic Area licenses, Call Signs WPOJ871 - WPOJ875, and that the construction deadline is HEREBY EXTENDED until July 14, 2011. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-47A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-47A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-47A1.txt
    • ``Waiver Request'') of the ban on integrated set-top boxes set forth in Section 76.1204(a)(1) of the Commission's rules for the Motorola DCT-700 integrated digital cable set-top box, a sub-$100 device that BendBroadband argues is critical to its plans to migrate to an all-digital network by 2008. For the reasons stated below, we conditionally grant BendBroadband a waiver pursuant to Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's rules. BACKGROUND Section 629 of the Act Section 629(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), requires the Commission to: adopt regulations to assure the commercial availability, to consumers of multichannel video programming and other services offered over multichannel video programming systems, of converter boxes, interactive communications equipment, and other equipment used
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4827A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4827A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4827A1.txt
    • Audio Division Media Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 73.3555(a). The proposed acquisition of KBIM(AM) is fully compliant with the local radio ownership rule. 47 U.S.C. � 310(d). See Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. F.C.C., 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (citing WAIT Radio v. F.C.C., 418 F. 2d 1153, 1157-59 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (``WAIT Radio'')). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (stating that rule provisions may be waived "for good cause shown") and 47 C.F.R. � 73.3566(a) (providing that requests for waiver "shall show the nature of the waiver or exception desired and shall set forth the reasons in support thereof''). The Commission declined to adopt any specific waiver criteria relating to radio station ownership in the 2002 Biennial Regulatory Review-Review
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-48A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-48A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-48A1.txt
    • with the Commission's rules. Finally, in response to CEA's contention that it has improperly requested a ``perpetual'' waiver under Section 629(c), Cablevision responds that ``it would be sufficient for the Commission to grant it until the cable industry's deployment of downloadable conditional access.'' discussion Cablevision makes its request for waiver ``[p]ursuant to [Section 629 of the Communications Act] and Sections 1.3, 76.7 and 76.1207 of the Commission's rules.'' Accordingly, we analyze its request pursuant to the waiver standards set forth in Section 629(c) as well as under the general waiver provisions found in Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's rules. As described in detail below, we do not believe that Cablevision meets the standard for waiver found in Section 629(c)
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4965A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4965A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4965A1.txt
    • the service area where its customers exclusively or primarily use their wireless service for purpose of reporting lines to receive universal service support. ordering clauseS Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291 and 1.3, that the Petition for Waiver of section 54.307(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.307(b), filed by Bristol Bay Cellular Partnership, IS GRANTED to the extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.102 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4971A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4971A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4971A1.txt
    • Competition Bureau Announces OMB Approval of the 2007 FCC Form 499-A, Public Notice, 22 FCC Rcd 5356 (rel. Mar. 19, 2007). Id. See Telecommunications Reporting Worksheet, FCC Form 499-A (2007). See Swetland Letter at 1. See e.g., China Unicom Letter at 1; Edgerton Letter at 1. Generally, the Commission's rules may be waived for good cause shown. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). In addition, the Commission may take into account considerations of hardship, equity, or more effective implementation of overall policy on an individual basis.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4985A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4985A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4985A1.txt
    • Mirror receivers are not used by a population with these special needs nor are they subject to a lengthy approval process. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to the authority contained in Sections 2(a), 4(i) and (j), 303, and 405 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 152(a), 154(i) and (j), 303, and 405, and Sections 1.3 and 1.106 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 1.106, the Petition for Waiver of Section 15.117(i) of the rules submitted by Electric Mirror, LLC IS DISMISSED, for the reasons indicated above. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Julius P. Knapp, Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology See Petition for Waiver submitted by Electric Mirror, LLC, February 28, 2007; see also
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-49A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-49A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-49A1.txt
    • its request only extends to the natural evolution of the specific boxes for which it seeks waiver and does not include any boxes that will have ``DVR, HD, multiple tuning, or broadband Internet access,'' and claims that it is not seeking a waiver for any box that has advanced capabilities. discussion Comcast makes its request for waiver ``[p]ursuant to Sections 1.3, 76.7 and 76.1207 of the Commission's rules and Section 629(c) of the Communications Act.'' Accordingly, we analyze its request pursuant to the waiver standards set forth in Section 629(c) and the Commission's 2005 Deferral Order, as well as under the general waiver provisions found in Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's rules. As discussed below, we find that the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5003A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5003A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5003A1.txt
    • subject to this extension are 1-800-784-2433 (1-800-SUICIDE); 1-888-784-2433 (1-888-SUICIDE); and 1-877-784-2432 (1-877-SUICIDA). 47 U.S.C. � 251(e)(1). Toll Free Service Access Codes, CC Docket No. 95-155, Second Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 11162, 11176, para. 18 (1997) (Toll Free Second Report and Order); see also 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 251(e). 47 U.S.C. � 151. 47 U.S.C. � 154(i). Furthermore, section 1.3 of our rules authorizes the Commission to suspend, revoke, amend, or waive a Commission rule for good cause shown. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. This rule provides that ``[a]ny provision of the rules may be waived by the Commission on its own motion or on petition if good cause therefore is shown.'' Id. Toll Free Service Access Codes, CC Docket No.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5079A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5079A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5079A1.txt
    • - and an explanation of why Leaco has chosen the compliance efforts it has chosen. We emphasize that irrespective of the relief we grant in this Order, we fully expect Leaco to achieve compliance as quickly as possible. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the ENHANCE 911 Act, Pub. L. No. 108-494, 118 Stat. 3986 (2004), and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the Petition for Extension of Waiver filed by Leaco Rural Telephone Cooperative, Inc. IS GRANTED, subject to the conditions and reporting requirements specified herein. The deadline for compliance with Section 20.18(g)(1)(v) is March 12, 2008. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.191 and 0.392
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5095A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5095A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5095A1.txt
    • the Commission's rules. It does not provide relief of the requirements of Section 15.5(b). Specifically, Respironics' devices must accept any interference that the operation of a LORAN-C radio station may cause. v. ORDERING CLAUSE Pursuant to Sections 4(i), 302, 303(e), and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 302, 303(e), and 303(r)) and Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules (47 C.F.R. � 1.3), and under the authority delegated in sections 0.31 and 0.241 of the Commission's rules (47 C.F.R. �� 0.31, 0.241), IT IS ORDERED that Respironics' request for an extension of its waiver for the ActiReader device is granted, as described above, and conditioned as follows: Respironics, Inc. may manufacture and sell a maximum
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5098A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5098A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5098A1.txt
    • therefore demonstrates that it is technically feasible to offer this service, we conclude that these waivers are no longer necessary and therefore will allow these waivers to expire on January 1, 2008. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 225 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 225, and Sections 0.141, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, and 1.3, this ORDER IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for VRS, the waivers of the one-line VCO, VCO-to-TTY, and VCO-to-VCO; one-line HCO, HCO-to-TTY, and HCO-to-HCO; call release; pay-per-call (900) calls, types of calls, and equal access to interexchange carrier requirements are hereby extended for one year, i.e., until January
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-514A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-514A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-514A1.txt
    • 1.1, rounded; the second additional acceptable bid amount equals the minimum acceptable bid amount times one plus two times the bid increment percentage, rounded, or (minimum acceptable bid amount) * 1.2, rounded; the third additional acceptable bid amount equals the minimum acceptable bid amount times one plus three times the bid increment percentage, rounded, or (minimum acceptable bid amount) * 1.3, rounded; etc. The Bureau will round the results of these calculations, as well as the calculations to determine the minimum acceptable bid amounts, using our standard rounding procedures. For Auction No. 72, the Bureau proposed to use a bid increment percentage of ten percent to calculate the additional acceptable bid amounts. The Bureau received no comment on this issue and
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-640A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-640A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-640A1.txt
    • attachment to its Waiver Request, Arso provides a Technical Statement which Arso claims demonstrates compliance pursuant to the interim contour-overlap methodology, as discussed in the Ownership Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 13729-30. WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (``WAIT Radio''), cited in Ownership Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 13647. ). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (stating that rule provisions may be waived "for good cause shown"). The Commission declined to adopt any specific waiver criteria relating to radio station ownership in the Ownership Order, but stated that ``[p]arties who believe that the particular facts of their case warrant a waiver of the local radio ownership rule may seek a waiver under the general `good cause'
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-659A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-659A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-659A1.txt
    • in part and extend the date by which SouthernLINC must achieve 95% penetration to November 12, 2007. We further impose the conditions and reporting requirements described herein to ensure that SouthernLINC achieves full compliance with the Commission's E911 requirements. ordering clauses IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the ENHANCE 911 Act, Pub. L. No. 108-494, 118 Stat. 3986 (2004), and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the foregoing Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Request for Additional Limited Waiver and Extension of the Handset Penetration Deadline of the Commission's Phase II E911 Rules by Southern Communications Services, Inc. d/b/a SouthernLINC Wireless IS GRANTED IN PART, subject to the conditions and reporting
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-66A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-66A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-66A1.txt
    • Sinclair, during an interim carriage period, a per subscriber daily rate as proposed by Sinclair to Mediacom on January 11, 2007. 2. We find that Mediacom has presented good cause to accelerate the pleading cycle in this proceeding. Although Sinclair correctly asserts that Section 1.115 does not set forth specific provisions for such action, there is ample authority in Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules to support our action here. Section 1.3 provides: The provisions of this chapter may be suspended, revoked, amended, or waived for good cause shown, in whole or in part, at any time by the Commission, subject to the provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act and the provisions of this chapter. Any provision of the rules may
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-6A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-6A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-6A1.txt
    • and Order, Fifth Report and Order, Fourth Memorandum Opinion and Order, and Order, WT Docket No. 02-55, et al., 19 FCC Rcd 14969 (2004) (Rebanding Report and Order). Rebanding Report and Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 15079 � 205 (footnote omitted). Rebanding Report and Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 15079 � 206 (citing 47 C.F.R. � 1.925). Pursuant to Section 1.3, the Commission may waive its rules if there is ``good cause'' to do so and if certain other criteria are satisfied. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990). In the context of 800 MHz Rebanding, the Commission defines ``good cause basis'' as a showing that the licensee would have
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-880A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-880A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-880A1.txt
    • Section 1.2109(b) of the Commission's rules to permit the grant to it of the Meyersdale construction permit. Section 1.2109(b) of the Commission's rules provides that, if a winning bidder withdraws or defaults after the close of an auction, the Commission may, at its discretion, offer licenses to other high bidders in descending order at their final bids. Pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, we may waive rule provisions "for good cause shown" by the petitioner. As interpreted by the courts, this standard requires that a petitioner demonstrate that ``special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule and such deviation will serve the public interest.'' 2510 Licenses asserts that Section 1.2109(b) should be applied here where bids were withdrawn
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1026A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1026A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1026A1.txt
    • 4(i), 201-203, and 254(g) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 201-203, and 254(g), and pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, that the Frontier Communications petition for waiver IS GRANTED to the extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, that section 69.3(i)(1) of the Commission's rules IS WAIVED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dana R. Shaffer
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1029A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1029A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1029A1.txt
    • request for a waiver of the notification requirements in section 54.418 of the Commission's rules. Pursuant to that rule section, eligible telecommunications carriers (ETCs) must notify their customers about the digital television (DTV) transition through use of bill notices or monthly stand-alone mailers and publicity campaigns. For the reasons stated below, we grant the Petitioners a waiver pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules. background The DTV Consumer Education Initiative Newly-adopted section 54.418 of the Commission's rules requires all ETCs that receive federal universal service support to provide specified DTV transition information on a monthly basis to their Lifeline or Link-Up customers and in their Lifeline or Link-Up publicity campaigns. ETCs are required to convey the following information: After February
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1090A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1090A2.txt
    • 56 24.5 N 119 15 22.0 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 2 45 56 0.2 N 119 19 17.5 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 2 45 55 18.7 N 119 21 48.0 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 2 45 55 7 N 119 25 51.1 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 2 45 47 45.7 N 119 26 2.6 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 2 45 36 11.1 N 119 26 1.3 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 2 45 36 7.7 N 119 14 50.1 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 2 45 30 58.9 N 119 14 50.1 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 2 45 30 58.2 N 119 8 39.1 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 2 45 4 59.3 N 119 8 43.5 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 2 45 4 59.3 N 119 9 43.8 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 2 44
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1094A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1094A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1094A1.txt
    • the U.S./Canada border area and may operate according to the non-border band plan listed in � 90.617. TABLE C5 - CITIES THAT ARE CONSIDERED TO FALL OUTSIDE THE CANADA BORDER REGION Location Coordinates Latitude Longitude Akron, Ohio Youngstown, Ohio Syracuse, New York 41( 05' 00.2" N. 41( 05' 57.2" N. 43( 03' 04.2" N. 81( 30' 39.4" W. 80( 39' 01.3" W. 76( 09' 12.7" W. (6) The channels listed in Table C6 and paragraph (c)(6)(i) of this section are available in the Canada Border Regions for non-cellular operations to eligible applicants in the Public Safety Category which consists of licensees eligible in the Public Safety Pool of subpart B of this part. 800 MHz high density cellular systems as defined
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1192A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1192A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1192A1.txt
    • regarding the composition of the USAC Board of Directors to better ensure ``the effective, efficient, and competitively neutral management of the [universal service fund].'' ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that sections 54.703(b)(1) and 54.703(c), 47 C.F.R. �� 54.703(b)(1), (c) ARE WAIVED to the extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.102 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.102, this Order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1210A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1210A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1210A1.txt
    • the limited waiver granted here, we find that regulation pursuant to our Part 61 rules is sufficient to address any potential issues that may arise concerning the effects of the waiver on the 2008 annual filing. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 201-205 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 201-205, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, section 61.42(g) of the Commission's rules IS WAIVED for TIPToP service offered by AT&T with respect to AT&T's 2008 annual access tariff filing requirements under section 61.43 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1211A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1211A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1211A1.txt
    • price caps, this could create ``headroom'' within a service category or band that could result in changes to the rates of other less competitive services, and such an outcome would not be in the public interest. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 201-205 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 201-205, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, section 61.42(g) of the Commission's rules IS WAIVED for Advanced Services in Hawaiian Telcom, Inc.'s Tariff FCC No. 2, with respect to Hawaiian's 2008 annual access tariff filing requirements under section 61.43 of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1295A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1295A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1295A1.txt
    • that the requested waiver be granted. This Order therefore grants ClearSounds' waiver request. As a result, ClearSounds may proceed with either TCB certification or Self-Declaration of Conformity pursuant to Part 68 of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.141 and 0.361 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the request for waiver of section 68.317(f) for Models ClearSounds CSC600+, ClearSounds CSC40+, ClearSounds A55+, ClearSounds A300+, ClearSounds A600+, ClearSounds TALK500, ClearSounds Talk500ER, and ClearSounds Photo50, filed by ClearSounds Communications, Inc., IS GRANTED to the extent stated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1368A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1368A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1368A1.txt
    • now owned or leased or hereafter acquired by the Mortgagor . . . [t]ogether with all . . . proceeds, profits and benefits at any time derived, received or had from any and all of the above-described property of the Mortgagor.'' Petition at 1-2 (citing Mortgage at 4, Granting Clause V) (Petitioner's emphasis)). Id. at 2. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (the Commission may waive any provision of its rules ``if good cause therefore is shown''). See also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (``Northeast Cellular'') (``waiver is appropriate . . . if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the . . . rule and such deviation will serve the public interest''); WAIT Radio
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1418A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1418A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1418A1.txt
    • continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. ordering clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Arkansas requests for review and waiver filed on behalf of itself and the applicants as listed in Appendices A and B ARE GRANTED and the underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further processing consistent with this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1449A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1449A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1449A1.txt
    • 26, 2008). This will provide the Commission with time to consider the issues raised by the Sprint Petition. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority of Sections 0.191 and 0.392 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.191, 0.392; Sections 4(i) and (j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 C.F.R. �� 154(i) and (j), and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and Section 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.925, that the deadline by which Sprint must vacate the Mid-Band is waived for a period of 30 days. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Derek K. Poarch Chief, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau Petition for Relief - Expedited Action Requested, filed by Sprint
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1453A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1453A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1453A1.txt
    • stemming from the extraordinary flood damage that the Cedar Rapids area has endured, and the importance of restoring cable service to its customers as quickly as possible so that they may be able to obtain important local news and information relative to the recovery efforts in their community, we conclude that the grant of a waiver to ImOn under Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's rules is justified. Given the emergency nature of this request and the enormous capital costs that ImOn faces in light of the damage to its systems, and specifically, the significant physical damage to ImOn's network facilities and damage to its customers' set top boxes, we also find good cause to grant waiver of the application
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1514A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1514A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1514A1.txt
    • 24952, 24972, para. 36 (2002) (2002 Interim Contribution Methodology Order) (adopting the 45-day revision window for the FCC Form 499-Q). See Aventure Request for Review at 1-2. See id. at 3. See id. See id. at Attach. B. See id. at 4. . Id. � 54.723. Generally, the Commission's rules may be waived for good cause shown. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). In addition, the Commission may take into account considerations of hardship, equity, or more effective implementation of overall policy on an individual basis.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1573A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1573A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1573A1.txt
    • forth in Section 76.1204(a)(1) of the Commission's rules so that it may place into service certain integrated digital cable set-top boxes. The Bureau has already granted GCL a limited waiver of the ban on integrated set-top boxes for the Scientific Atlanta Explorer 1850, finding that the extraordinary typhoon damage that GCL has endured demonstrated good cause for waiver under Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's rules. As set forth below, we modify Guam's request for waiver to include the Scientific Atlanta Explorer 2200 and the Scientific Atlanta Explorer 8300. BACKGROUND Congress directed the Commission to adopt regulations to assure the commercial availability of navigation devices more than ten years ago as part of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. The Commission
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1575A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1575A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1575A1.txt
    • in Section 76.1204(a)(1) of the Commission's rules to allow it to place into service integrated digital cable set-top boxes. The Bureau has already granted Choice a limited waiver of the ban on integrated set-top boxes for certain set-top box models, finding that the fact that Choice transitioned to an all-digital system demonstrated good cause for such a waiver under Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's rules. As set forth below, we grant Choice's request for a waiver of Section 76.1204(a)(1) of the Commission's rules. BACKGROUND Congress directed the Commission to adopt regulations to assure the commercial availability of navigation devices more than ten years ago as part of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. The Commission implemented this directive in 1998
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1581A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1581A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1581A1.txt
    • of the date of this Order, transfer the full amount of the outstanding debt to the United States Department of Treasury for debt collection and other administrative or judicial action. Ordering clauseS Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED pursuant to Sections 4(i), 303(r), and 309(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 303(r), and 309(j), and Sections 1.3 and 1.1204(g)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 1.1204(g)(1), that the request for reduction of bid withdrawal payments filed on behalf of Barry P. Lunderville, Connoisseur Media, LLC, College Creek Broadcasting, Inc., Cumulus Licensing LLC, and Kemp Communications, Inc., on November 20, 2006, IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED pursuant to Sections 4(i), 303(r), and 309(j) of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1627A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1627A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1627A1.txt
    • television sets after the transition and submit a sworn declaration to the Commission confirming that this is the case, and (4) the operator must publicly commit to this plan by sworn declaration. As we explained in the BendBroadband Order, such a declaration will ``demonstrate [a] commitment to move to an all-digital network.'' Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 76.7, a conditional waiver of Section 76.1204(a)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 76.1204(a)(1), IS GRANTED to Waitsfield-Fayston Telephone Co, Inc and Tri-County Communications, Inc. for the Motorola DCT-700 and DCT-2214, conditioned as set forth in this Order. This action is taken pursuant to authority delegated by Section 0.283
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1632A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1632A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1632A1.txt
    • other than their MVPD. Although the cable industry has challenged the lawfulness of the integration ban on three separate occasions, in each of those cases the D.C. Circuit denied those petitions. In limited circumstances, however, operators may be eligible for waiver of the integration ban. discussion Petitioners make their requests for waiver pursuant to the Financial Hardship Order and Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's rules. In light of Petitioners' demonstrated financial hardships and consistent with the Financial Hardship Order, we conclude that a limited grant of their Extension Requests until January 31, 2009 is justified under Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's rules. We therefore grant Petitioners limited waivers of the integration ban for the Subject Boxes. On
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1685A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1685A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1685A1.txt
    • June 2, 2008, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau initiated an investigation into whether RangeVideo is marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices, specifically, wireless video transmitters. At the time of that letter, we observed on your website, www.rangevideo.com, your marketing of the following radio frequency devices: 900MHz 100mW audio/video transmitter 900MHz 500mW audio/video transmitter 1.3GHz 300mW audio/video transmitter 2.4GHz 200mW audio/video transmitter 2.4GHz 500mW audio/video transmitter 2.4GHz 1000mW audio/video transmitter 2.4GHz 1000mW cased audio/video transmitter. In your response to the LOI dated June 30, 2008, you state that you do not manufacture these transmitter devices. You admit that you first imported the devices on August 2, 2006, that you continue to import the devices, that
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1687A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1687A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1687A1.txt
    • that the requested waiver be granted. This Order therefore grants Primatronix's waiver request. As a result, Primatronix may proceed with either TCB certification or Self-Declaration of Conformity pursuant to Part 68 of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.141 and 0.361 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the request for waiver of section 68.317(f) for Models Ampli50 and Ampli100, filed by Primatronix LTD, IS GRANTED to the extent stated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: (1) the volume reset override switch shall be labeled as such and located
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-169A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-169A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-169A1.txt
    • and to allow it to retain its current regulatory status until the Commission concludes its review of the all-or-nothing rule in the MAG Second Further Notice. ordering clauseS Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91, and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91 and 0.291 that the petition for waiver of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 61.41 (b) and (c) filed by FairPoint IS GRANTED, to the extent described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dana R.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1730A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1730A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1730A1.txt
    • 14 FCC Rcd at 190-96 �� 77-89. See First Report and Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 193-94 � 84. The Commission directed RPCs to promptly adopt operating procedures that ``ensure that all entities will be given reasonable notice of all committee meetings and deliberations.'' Id. at 195 � 86. Id. .. 47 C.F.R. � 90.527. . See Revised Plan, Section 1.3 Plan Development and Regional Participation at 10-11. See Revised Plan Appendix A - Bylaws at 66-73 (adopted Aug. 14, 2006). See Revised Plan Appendix B - Original Region 20 Member List and Contact Information; see also, Plan Appendix B-1 Region 20 Membership at Time of Completion of the 700 MHz Plan. See Revised Plan, Section 2.1 - Notification Process at
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1748A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1748A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1748A1.txt
    • additional 30 days to provide the Commission with additional time to consider the issues raised by the Sprint Petition. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority of Sections 0.191 and 0.392 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.191, 0.392, Sections 4(i) and (j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 C.F.R. �� 154(i) and (j), Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and Section 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.925, that the deadline by which Sprint must vacate the Mid-Band is waived for a period of 30 days until August 25, 2008. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Derek K. Poarch Chief, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau Petition for Relief - Expedited Action
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1824A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1824A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1824A1.txt
    • and will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. ordering clauseS Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291 and 1.3, that the petitions for waiver filed by Saddleback Communications, Pine Belt Cellular, Inc., and IT&E Overseas, Inc., and the petition for waiver of the 2006 annual ETC report filing deadline filed by Gila River Telecommunications, Inc. ARE GRANTED to the extent described herein, and that the petition for waiver
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1874A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1874A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1874A1.txt
    • has not yet filed a covering license application. See BP-20070601BDE at Exhibit 5 (``Multiple Ownership Exhibit''). WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir 1969) ("WAIT Radio"), cited in Ownership Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 13647. See Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir 1990) (citing WAIT Radio); see also 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (stating that rule provisions may be waived "for good cause shown"). The Commission declined to adopt any specific waiver criteria relating to radio station ownership in the Ownership Order, but stated that "[p]arties who believe that the particular facts of their case warrant a waiver of the local radio ownership rule may seek a waiver under the general 'good cause'
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1890A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1890A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1890A1.txt
    • to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. ordering clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the Savannah request for review IS GRANTED and the underlying application IS REMANDED to USAC for further processing consistent with this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1923A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1923A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1923A1.txt
    • service, and must be protected from harmful interference from secondary services. 47 C.F.R. � 25.203. 47 C.F.R. �� 25.115(e), 25.138(d). 47 C.F.R. � 25.203. 47 C.F.R. � 25.138(d). See, e.g., Application File No. SES-LIC-20080205, Attachment A at 2-3. See, e.g., Application File No. SES-LIC-20080205, Attachment A at 2-3. The Commission may waive its rules for good cause. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972) (WAIT Radio). The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (Northeast Cellular). In doing so, the Commission
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1948A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1948A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1948A1.txt
    • encounters significant construction difficulties'' -- would not be undermined by an abbreviated construction period for WUKQ-FM. We have examined the Application, and we find that it complies with all pertinent statutory and regulatory requirements and that its grant, as conditioned herein, would further the public interest, convenience, and necessity. Accordingly we will grant the Application below and, pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Rules, include a condition requiring the completion of the modification of the WUKQ-FM facilities within six months of the date of grant of the Application. We believe this to be sufficient time for Univision to implement the mandated frequency change and to publicize and promote the change to its listeners. Conclusion/Actions. For the reasons set forth above, the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1957A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1957A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1957A1.txt
    • with actual data. . We encourage filers to use any and all methods they deem necessary to ensure their filings are timely received. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.903(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.903(a) filed by Westgate Communications LLC d/b/a WeavTel IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to 0.291(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 0.291(b)(1) this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1963A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1963A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1963A1.txt
    • additional 30 days to provide the Commission with additional time to consider the issues raised by the Sprint Petition. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority of Sections 0.191 and 0.392 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.191, 0.392, Sections 4(i) and (j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 C.F.R. �� 154(i) and (j), Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and Section 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.925, that the deadline by which Sprint must vacate the Mid-Band is waived for a period of 30 days until September 24, 2008. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Derek K. Poarch Chief, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau Petition for Relief - Expedited Action
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1990A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1990A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1990A1.txt
    • are necessary. High-cost loop support payments to Sacred Wind for periods subsequent to December 2008 will be based on historic data in accordance with the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that waiver of sections 36.611 and 36.612 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 36.611 and 36.612, IS GRANTED, as described herein, to Sacred Wind Communications, Inc. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2000A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2000A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2000A1.txt
    • to the extent that they require consumer education after September 30, 2008, and reporting on consumer education efforts that take place after the third quarter of 2008. Ordering clauses IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 303 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 303, and Sections 1.3 and 73.1635 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 73.1635, this Report and Order IS ADOPTED and a limited waiver of Sections 73.674 and 73.3526(e)(11)(iv) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 73.674 and 73.3526(e)(11)(iv), IS GRANTED to the licensees of WSFX-TV, WSFX-DT, WECT-TV, WECT-DT, WWAY-TV, and WWAY-DT for the operation of those stations. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2139A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2139A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2139A1.txt
    • additional 30 days to provide the Commission with additional time to consider the issues raised by the Sprint Petition. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority of Sections 0.191 and 0.392 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.191, 0.392, Sections 4(i) and (j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 C.F.R. �� 154(i) and (j), Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and Section 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.925, that the deadline by which Sprint must vacate the Mid-Band is waived for a period of 30 days until October 24, 2008. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Derek K. Poarch Chief, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau Petition for Relief - Expedited Action
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2242A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2242A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2242A1.txt
    • Telecommunications Reporting Worksheet, FCC Form 499-A (2007). See 2007 499-A Waiver Order, 22 FCC Rcd at 21505, para. 1. Id. at 21507, para. 5. Id. See Mobilephone Letter at 1; South Miami Letter at 1. See, e.g., Payphone Letter at 1; South Miami Letter at 1. Generally, the Commission's rules may be waived for good cause shown. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). In addition, the Commission may take into account considerations of hardship, equity, or more effective implementation of overall policy on an individual basis.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2336A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2336A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2336A1.txt
    • the petitioners have enacted in response to these late filings, we do not expect these petitioners to seek similar waivers in the future. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that this order is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver of section 54.307 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.307, filed by Vantage Point for Advanced Communications Technology, Inc., IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver of section 54.802 of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2337A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2337A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2337A1.txt
    • found at http://www.usac.org/hc/tools/filing-tool/default.aspx. We encourage filers to use any and all methods they deem necessary to ensure that their filings are timely received. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that this order is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver of section 54.802 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.802, filed by HTC Services, Inc., IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. ��1.102(b), this
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2348A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2348A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2348A1.txt
    • that the requested waiver be granted. This Order therefore grants Primatronix's waiver request. As a result, Primatronix may proceed with either TCB certification or Self-Declaration of Conformity pursuant to Part 68 of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.141 and 0.361 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the request for waiver of section 68.317(f) for Models CSC48, CSC48P, and Photo50, filed by Primatronix LTD, IS GRANTED to the extent stated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: (1) the volume reset override switch shall be labeled as such and
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2351A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2351A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2351A1.txt
    • additional 30 days to provide the Commission with additional time to consider the issues raised by the Sprint Petition. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority of Sections 0.191 and 0.392 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.191, 0.392, Sections 4(i) and (j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 C.F.R. �� 154(i) and (j), Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and Section 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.925, that the deadline by which Sprint must vacate the Mid-Band is waived for a period of 30 days until November 24, 2008. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Derek K. Poarch Chief, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau Petition for Relief - Expedited Action
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2363A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2363A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2363A1.txt
    • the program and will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review listed in the Appendix ARE GRANTED and REMANDED to USAC for further consideration consistent with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2364A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2364A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2364A1.txt
    • and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 54.722(a), that the request for review filed by Grand Rapids Public Schools on June 8, 2007, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 54.722(a), section 54.504(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.504(c) IS WAIVED to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2365A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2365A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2365A1.txt
    • to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed by Harvey Public Library District IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2366A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2366A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2366A1.txt
    • aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the Request for Review filed by Hillsboro Independent School District IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2368A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2368A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2368A1.txt
    • program and will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. ordering clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. ��0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Liberal Unified School District 480, Liberal, Kansas, on May 5, 2004, IS GRANTED and REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1-4 and
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2371A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2371A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2371A1.txt
    • aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the Request for Review filed by Radford City Schools IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2372A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2372A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2372A1.txt
    • will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Tekoa Academy of Accelerated Studies, Port Arthur, Texas, on March 5, 2004, IS GRANTED and REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2376A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2376A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2376A1.txt
    • of the program and will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. ordering clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the requests for waiver of 47 C.F.R. �54.507(c) filed by the petitioners as listed in the appendix ARE GRANTED and REMANDED to USAC for further consideration consistent with this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2378A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2378A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2378A1.txt
    • or a denial based on a complete review and analysis no later than 60 calendar days from release of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to the authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, that section 54.504(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.504(c), IS WAIVED to the extent necessary as provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.102 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2379A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2379A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2379A1.txt
    • to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. ordering clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), the Requests for Review and or Waiver of 47 C.F.R. �54.507 filed by the Petitioners as listed in the Appendix ARE GRANTED and REMANDED to USAC for further action consistent with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2381A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2381A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2381A1.txt
    • of the program and will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the underlying applications associated with the appeals listed in the appendix ARE GRANTED and REMANDED to USAC for further consideration consistent with this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2382A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2382A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2382A1.txt
    • aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), the Requests for Review and Requests for Waiver filed by the Petitioners as listed in the Appendix ARE GRANTED and REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2383A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2383A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2383A1.txt
    • 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review listed in the Appendix ARE GRANTED and REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, that section 54.504(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.504(c), IS WAIVED to the extent necessary as provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. ��
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2384A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2384A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2384A1.txt
    • 54.722(a) the Requests for Review as listed in the Appendix ARE GRANTED and ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that section 54.504(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.504(c) IS WAIVED to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2385A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2385A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2385A1.txt
    • to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. ordering clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review and Requests for Waiver filed by the petitioners as listed in the Appendix ARE GRANTED and REMANDED to USAC for further consideration to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2387A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2387A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2387A1.txt
    • School District on November 16, 2007, ARE GRANTED and REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that section 54.511 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.511, IS WAIVED to the limited extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2388A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2388A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2388A1.txt
    • continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. ordering clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the requests for review filed by the Hispanic Information and Telecommunications Network, Inc., Brooklyn, New York, on August 25, 2006, and Consorcio de Escuelas y Bibliotecas de Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico, on August 25, 2006, and October 2, 2006, respectively, ARE GRANTED and
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2511A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2511A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2511A1.txt
    • that the requested waiver be granted. This Order therefore grants Primatronix's waiver request. As a result, Primatronix may proceed with either TCB certification or Self-Declaration of Conformity pursuant to Part 68 of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.141 and 0.361 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the request for waiver of section 68.317(f) for Model 317CI, filed by Primatronix LTD, IS GRANTED to the extent stated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: (1) the volume reset override switch shall be labeled as such and located on the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2512A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2512A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2512A1.txt
    • other than their MVPD. Although the cable industry has challenged the lawfulness of the integration ban on three separate occasions, in each of those cases the D.C. Circuit denied those petitions. In limited circumstances, however, operators may be eligible for waiver of the integration ban. discussion Petitioners make their requests for waiver pursuant to the Financial Hardship Order and Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's rules. In light of Petitioners' demonstrated financial hardships and consistent with the Financial Hardship Order, we conclude that a limited grant of their Waiver Requests until January 31, 2009 is justified under Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's rules. We therefore grant Petitioners limited waivers of the integration ban for the Subject Boxes. On
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2513A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2513A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2513A1.txt
    • forth in Section 76.1204(a)(1) of the Commission's rules to allow it to place into service integrated digital cable set-top boxes. The Bureau has already granted Liberty a limited waiver of the ban on integrated set-top boxes for certain set-top box models, finding the fact that Liberty transitioned to an all-digital system demonstrated good cause for such a waiver under Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's rules. As set forth below, we grant Liberty's request for a waiver of Section 76.1204(a)(1) of the Commission's rules. BACKGROUND Congress directed the Commission to adopt regulations to assure the commercial availability of navigation devices more than ten years ago as part of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. The Commission implemented this directive in 1998
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2614A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2614A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2614A1.txt
    • Economic Area licenses, File Nos. 0003469981-0003470012, IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, and that the five-year construction deadline IS HEREBY EXTENDED until July 19, 2012, and the ten-year construction deadline IS HEREBY EXTENDED until July 19, 2014. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 1.3, 1.925, 1.946 and 90.155(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, 1.946, 90.155(d), FCR, Inc. BE GRANTED additional time to meet its current five- and ten-year construction requirements for its multilateration Location and Monitoring Service Economic Area licenses, Call Signs WPTH 901-WPTH 908 and WPOJ 871-WPOJ 875, and that the five-year construction deadline IS HEREBY EXTENDED until July
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2648A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2648A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2648A1.txt
    • the development of coordinated regional plans, and developed a Regional Planning Guidebook. Following the sunset of the NCC's charter on July 25, 2003, the National Public Safety Telecommunications Council (NPSTC) agreed to continue to provide assistance to regional planners. A copy of the 700 MHz Regional Planning Guidebook is available at the NPSTC website at http://www.npstc.org/documents.html. See Revised Plan, Section 1.3 Plan Development and Regional Participation at 10-11. See Revised Plan at Appendix C - Notices, Minutes, Membership Attendance Lists (the July 29, 2003 Meeting Minutes note that due to the lack of statewide notification, the RPC re-convened). See Revised Plan Appendix A - (Committee/Workgroup Membership), lists three committees: Core Committee (responsible for drafting the 700 MHz plan); Frequency Advisory Committee
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-268A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-268A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-268A1.txt
    • inconsistent with the public interest. Absent a waiver in this case, the affected communities would experience an interruption of popular network programming as the result of Time Warner's inability to comply fully with Section 76.1603(b). We, therefore, conclude that the public interest would be served by granting Time Warner's request. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 76.7, the request for waiver filed by Time Warner Cable of Section 76.1603(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 76.1603(b), IS GRANTED as discussed herein. This action is taken pursuant to authority delegated by Section 0.283 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 0.283. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Monica Shah
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2695A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2695A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2695A1.txt
    • 17 FCC Rcd at 24972, para. 36. 47 C.F.R. � 54.702(c). We note that an executive officer of the contributor must certify ``that any projections in the Telecommunications Reporting Worksheet represents a good faith estimate based on the contributors policies and procedures.'' 47 C.F.R. � 54.711(a). Generally, the Commission's rules may be waived for good cause shown. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F. 2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). In addition, the Commission may take into account considerations of hardship, equity, or more effective implementation of overall policy on an individual
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-27A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-27A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-27A1.txt
    • of a first local broadcast service to Nunn, Colorado, under Priority 3 of the FM allotment priorities. A staff engineering analysis indicates that Channel 286A can be substituted for vacant Channel 247A at Wheatland, Wyoming, consistent with the technical engineering requirements of the Commission's Rules, at coordinates of 42-04-28 NL and 104-56-51 WL, with a site restriction of 2.2 kilometers (1.3 miles) northeast of Wheatland. 3. Accordingly, we seek comment on the proposed amendment of the FM Table of Allotments, Section 73.202(b), as follows: Community Present Proposed Wheatland, Wyoming 247A 286A 4. The Commission's authority to institute rule making proceedings, showings required, cut-off procedures, and filing requirements are contained in the attached Appendix and are incorporated by reference herein. In particular,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2808A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2808A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2808A1.txt
    • Relay service is appropriate. For this reason, we grant AT&T's request for an extension of this waiver through April 30, 2009. After that date, all IP Relay providers must offer this feature. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 225 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 225, and Sections 0.141, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, and 1.3, this ORDER IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for VRS, the waivers of the one-line VCO, VCO-to-TTY, and VCO-to-VCO; one-line HCO, HCO-to-TTY, and HCO-to-HCO; call release; pay-per-call (900) calls, types of calls, and equal access to interexchange carrier requirements are hereby extended for one year until January 1,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2822A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2822A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2822A1.txt
    • Forfeiture, 23 FCC Rcd 20 (EB 2008). NEP Cellcorp Petition at 2. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(3). See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969), appeal after remand, 459 F.2d 1203 (D.C. Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972); Northeast Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990); 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Rio Grande Family Radio Fellowship, Inc. v. FCC, 406 F.2d 664 (D.C. Cir. 1968). Inductive Coupling Capability Waivers Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 3356-3357 � 7. (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA-08-2822 Federal Communications Commission DA-08-2822 ; f " � �
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-303A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-303A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-303A1.txt
    • period from 0.0072 to 0.00819 in order to collect the additional monies needed over the remaining months of the fund year. The revised Fund size shall be $636,736,491.75. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in Section 225 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 225, and Sections 0.141, 0.361 and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361 and 1.3, this Order IS hereby ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Interstate TRS Fund size for the July 2007 through June 2008 funding period will increase from $553,378,363.18 to $636,736,491.75 and that, as a result, the annual contribution factor shall be modified from 0.0072 to 0.00819. IT IS FURTHER
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-319A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-319A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-319A1.txt
    • a limited waiver of section 54.504 of our rules and remand Franklin-McKinley's appeal to USAC for further processing consistent with our decision. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Franklin-McKinley School District IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-401A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-401A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-401A1.txt
    • at 1545-46. See 47 C.F.R. � 25.222(c); see also ESV Report and Order, 20 FCC Rcd at 695-96, � 48. See VMES Notice, 22 FCC Rcd at 9676-77 �� 61-64. Accord with 47 C.F.R. � 25.222(c)(1). Compare with Qualcomm, 4 FCC Rcd at 1456. Raysat Reply at 7. ViaSat Response at 4. Raysat Reply at 7. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. VMES Notice, 22 FCC Rcd at 9680. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1310. Id. Application, Radiation Hazard Analysis at 1. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 08-401 Federal Communications Commission DA 08-401 � ! " # % ) / 0 4 5 : B � � � � � � hH hH hH � � � � � �
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-406A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-406A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-406A1.txt
    • - and an explanation of why SouthernLINC has chosen the compliance efforts it has chosen. We emphasize that irrespective of the relief we grant in this Order, we fully expect SouthernLINC to achieve compliance as quickly as possible. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the ENHANCE 911 Act, Pub. L. No. 108-494, 118 Stat. 3986 (2004), and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the Request for Further Limited Waiver filed by Southern Communications Services, Inc. d/b/a SouthernLINC Wireless IS GRANTED IN PART, subject to the conditions and reporting requirements specified herein. The deadline for compliance with Section 20.18(g)(1)(v) is August 15, 2008. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-41A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-41A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-41A1.txt
    • the good cause required for us to grant a rule waiver. Accordingly, we deny Cedar Valley's request for waiver of the Commission's rules. ordering clauseS Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291 and 1.3, that the Petition of Cedar Valley Communications, Inc. for Waiver of Sections 54.307(d), 54.314(a) and 54.904(d) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.307(c)(3), IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.102 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.102, this
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-437A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-437A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-437A1.txt
    • programming on their television sets after the transition and submit a sworn declaration to the Commission confirming that this is the case, and (4) publicly commit to this plan by sworn declaration. As we explained in the BendBroadband Order, such a declaration will ``demonstrate [a] commitment to move to an all-digital network.'' Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 76.7, a conditional waiver of Section 76.1204(a)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 76.1204(a)(1), IS GRANTED to the Petitioners listed in the Appendix conditioned as set forth in this Order. This action is taken pursuant to authority delegated by Section 0.283 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 0.283.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-438A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-438A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-438A1.txt
    • television sets after the transition and submit a sworn declaration to the Commission confirming that this is the case, and (4) the operator must publicly commit to this plan by sworn declaration. As we explained in the BendBroadband Order, such a declaration will ``demonstrate [a] commitment to move to an all-digital network.'' Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 76.7, a conditional waiver of Section 76.1204(a)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 76.1204(a)(1), IS GRANTED to Innovative Cable TV, St. Thomas-St. John & St. Croix and Massillon Cable TV, conditioned as set forth in this Order. This action is taken pursuant to authority delegated by Section 0.283 of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-449A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-449A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-449A1.txt
    • rules on behalf of the applicants at issue. See April 2007 Appeal at 11-12. Because we grant the appeals related to eight of the applicants, the waiver request only pertains to the remaining applicant, Jackson. For the reasons discussed below, we do not find good cause to grant a waiver of our competitive bidding rules in this instance. 47 C.F.R. �1.3; see infra paras. 15-18. We estimate that the appeals granted in this Order involve application for approximately $1,397,348.88 in funding. We note that USAC has already reserved sufficient funds to address outstanding appeals. See, e.g., Universal Service Administrative Company, Federal Universal Service Support Mechanisms Fund Size Projections for the Second Quarter 2008 (Feb.1, 2008). Thus, we determine that the action
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-45A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-45A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-45A1.txt
    • through April 30, 2008. Based on Snap's and Verizon's requests for waiver, this should provide Snap and Verizon with a sufficient transition period to complete implementation of the speed dialing feature. ordering clauses 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 225 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 225, and Sections 0.141, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, and 1.3, this ORDER IS ADOPTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the waiver of the speed dialing requirement for VRS providers is extended through April 30, 2008. 6. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order shall be effective upon release. . FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Catherine W. Seidel, Chief Consumer &
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-519A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-519A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-519A1.txt
    • the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC), subject to the conditions discussed herein, to recommence disbursing high-cost universal service support to New Florence Telephone Company (NFTC) as of April 1, 2007, the date as of which the Missouri Public Service Commission (Missouri Commission) has certified that NFTC will use federal high-cost support consistent with its intended purposes. Furthermore, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, we find good cause to waive, on our own motion, section 54.314(d) of the Commission's rules setting forth the filing deadlines for annual state certifications of high-cost universal service support for NFTC to allow it to receive high-cost support beginning April 1, 2007. BACKGROUND NFTC is a rural, incumbent local exchange carrier (LEC) serving the New
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-538A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-538A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-538A1.txt
    • International Bureau See Star One S.A.; Petition for Declaratory Ruling to Add the Star One C5 Satellite at 68� W.L. to the Permitted Space Station List, IBFS File No. SAT-PPL-20071113-00159, Grant Stamp (February 7, 2008) (Star One C5 Grant). 47 C.F.R. � 25.165. IBFS File No. SAT-MOD-20080304-00057 (Modification Application). See Modification Application at 2. 47 C.F.R. � 25.165(a). See Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (WAIT Radio); Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. See also Comsat Corporation, Petition for Partial Relief from the Current Regulatory Treatment of Comsat World Systems' Switched
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-566A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-566A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-566A1.txt
    • and certification to the Commission that complies with all requirements of section 64.1120(e), except that the 30-day timeframes for doing so are waived herein. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.141, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Telescape Communications, Inc., on March 5, 2008, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Erica H. McMahon, Chief Consumer Policy Division Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau See 2000 Biennial Review-Review of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-588A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-588A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-588A1.txt
    • 7. We note, but reject, BCI's tautology that the ``automatic downgrade'' procedure adopted in the Streamlining Order, and codified in 47 C.F.R. � 73.3573 Note 4, cannot be waived by the staff because the procedure was adopted by the ``full Commission.'' Id. All Rules emanate from the ``full Commission.'' See 47 C.F.R. �� 0.201, 0.283. See also, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3573, Note 4. The Rule specifies, in pertinent part, that if a station does not implement Class C facilities before its upgrade construction permit expires, the station's allotment reverts to Class C0. See Reply at 5. Streamlining Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 23087. The automatic forfeiture provision eliminated ``the Commission's long-standing practice . . . to
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-589A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-589A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-589A1.txt
    • 2006 compliance deadline. Id. at � 8. See, e.g., id. at �� 18-22. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(3). See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969), appeal after remand, 459 F.2d 1203 (D.C. Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972); Northeast Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990); 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1158 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972); see also Family Stations, Inc. v. DirecTV, Inc., Order on Reconsideration, 19 FCC Rcd 14777, 14780 (MB 2004). Rio Grande Family Radio Fellowship, Inc. v. FCC, 406 F.2d 664 (D.C. Cir. 1968). Inductive Coupling Capability Waivers Order at � 7. Alaska DigiTel
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-633A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-633A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-633A1.txt
    • feeder links to an Orbcomm gateway, and then through the Orbcomm Network Control Center to the Coast Guard, in support of the Coast Guard's maritime domain awareness program. Orbcomm hopes to demonstrate that its satellites can collect and forward AIS data from ships located well beyond the coasts of the United States in a cost effective and timely fashion. Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules authorizes the Commission to waive its rules for ``good cause shown.'' Waiver is appropriate only if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule and such deviation would better serve the public interest than would strict adherence to the general rule. Generally, the Commission may grant a waiver of its rules in a particular case
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-673A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-673A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-673A1.txt
    • both stations. For example, on May 21, 2007, the staff granted an amendment to the KLQQ(FM), Clearmont, Wyoming, application for minor change of a facility (File No. BPH-20070231AFT) to make the application contingent with the application of KGCL(FM), Ten Sleep, Wyoming, for a minor modification to a construction permit (File No. BMPH-20070306AAX), which was also granted. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See Radio 2000, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 15453, 15456 (1996) (Commission affirms practice of accepting untimely amendments to minor change applications, renumbering the application as of the date of the amendment, and billing the applicant the appropriate filing fee where that process served the public interest by providing ``speedier initiation of improved broadcast service to the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-710A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-710A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-710A1.txt
    • the Second Report and Order, the Commission found that a viewer's reasonable expectation regarding the availability of alerts over television programming is identical, whether the programming is over-the-air broadcasting, cable, DBS, or a new wireline video service. The Commission thus extended EAS requirements to wireline video service providers. In this limited waiver context, however, we find that, consistent with Section 1.3 and WAIT Radio, AT&T has demonstrated unique factual circumstances, i.e., that technical limitations of its system architecture, affecting both hardware and software equipment, prevent it from complying with the deadline in the Second Report and Order and that, absent an upgrade of its hardware and software facilities, it has no reasonable alternative by which to provide EAS on all of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-758A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-758A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-758A1.txt
    • that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i) and (j), 201-209, of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i) and (j), 201-209, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91 and 0.291, this order IS HEREBY ADOPTED as described above. 14. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commissions rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91 and 0.291, section 61.49(k) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 61.49(k), IS WAIVED for the purpose specified in paragraph 4 supra. 15. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.3 of the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-767A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-767A2.txt
    • 56 24.5 N 119 15 22.0 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 2 45 56 0.2 N 119 19 17.5 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 2 45 55 18.7 N 119 21 48.0 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 2 45 55 7 N 119 25 51.1 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 2 45 47 45.7 N 119 26 2.6 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 2 45 36 11.1 N 119 26 1.3 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 2 45 36 7.7 N 119 14 50.1 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 2 45 30 58.9 N 119 14 50.1 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 2 45 30 58.2 N 119 8 39.1 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 2 45 4 59.3 N 119 8 43.5 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 2 45 4 59.3 N 119 9 43.8 W CW-BTA460-E AREA 2 44
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-802A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-802A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-802A1.txt
    • 20.9, which specifies that Part 22 Paging and Radiotelephone Service operations be treated as commercial mobile radio services, and (ii) Section 22.565, which specifies the transmitting power limits associated with Part 22 Paging and Radiotelephone Service operations. Wyoming seeks waiver relief pursuant to Section 337(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 337(c), or, alternatively, Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925. Wyoming states that it expects WyoLink to be used by participating local, state, and federal agencies to support critical public safety activities serving Wyoming's population of over 500,000 residents and its more than 11 million annual visitors and tourists. Although Wyoming estimates that the requested Part 22 channels represent
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-821A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-821A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-821A1.txt
    • 64.604(a)(4), must implement a manual system for doing so, to the extent feasible, that accomplishes the proper routing of emergency 711-dialed calls as efficiently as possible. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 1, 2, and 225 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 152, and 225, and Sections 0.141, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.316 & 1.3, this Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that interconnected VoIP providers ARE GRANTED a waiver, until March 31, 2009, of the requirement to route 711-dialed calls to an appropriate relay center, but only in the context of 711-dialed calls in which the calling party is using a non-geographically
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-867A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-867A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-867A1.txt
    • while we are extending the deadline to meet the construction requirements, we remind LMDS licensees that they must timely file a renewal application in compliance with the Commission's Rules for their licenses. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 309 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 309, and Sections 1.3, 1.925, and 1.946 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, 1.946, that the applications for waivers and extensions of time to demonstrate substantial service listed in the Appendix to this Order ARE GRANTED to the extent indicated and are otherwise DENIED, and the deadline for those licenses listed in the Appendix to demonstrate substantial service IS EXTENDED until
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-889A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-889A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-889A1.txt
    • transition and submit sworn declarations to the Commission confirming that this is the case, and (4) within 10 days of the release of this order, publicly commit to this plan by sworn declarations. As we explained in the BendBroadband Order, such declarations will ``demonstrate [a] commitment to move to an all-digital network.'' Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 76.7, a limited, conditional waiver of Section 76.1204(a)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 76.1204(a)(1), IS GRANTED to Bresnan Communications, LLC for its system in Gillette, Wyoming, and to Mediacom Communications Corporation for the communities listed in the Appendix, conditioned as set forth in this Order. This action is
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-925A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-925A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-925A1.txt
    • advancing universal service. . We encourage filers to use any and all methods they deem necessary to ensure their filings are timely received. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.314(d)(6) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.314(d)(6), filed by the Illinois Commerce Commission, the petition for waiver of section 54.314(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.314(d), filed by Farmers Mutual Telephone Company, and the petition for waiver of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1084A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1084A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1084A1.txt
    • on-air operations, the application is unacceptable). See Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. F.C.C., 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (``[A] waiver is appropriate only if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule and such deviation will serve the public interest,'' citing WAIT Radio v. F.C.C., 418 F.2d 1153, 1157-59 (D.C. Cir. 1969)); see also 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3566(a) (applications which are determined to be patently not in accordance with the FCC rules, regulations, or other requirements, unless accompanied by an appropriate request for waiver, will be considered defective and will not be accepted for filing). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 May 18, 2009 2 3 � �
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1095A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1095A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1095A1.txt
    • 80.215. Section 80.205 addresses bandwidths, with an accompanying table that ``gives the class of emission and corresponding emission designator and authorized bandwidth.'' See 47 C.F.R. � 80.205. Section 80.211 addresses emission limitations. See 47 C.F.R. � 80.211. Section 80.215 addresses transmitter power limitations. See 47 C.F.R. � 80.215. See Waiver Clarification. See 47 C.F.R. �� 80.205, 80.211, 80.215. Under Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, we may consider on our own motion whether to waive those rules for which Granite has not requested relief, for good cause shown. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See In the Matter of Maritel, Inc. and Mobex Network Services, LLC, WT Docket No. 04-257, Report and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 8971-72 � 1 (2007) (Coast Station
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1132A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1132A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1132A1.txt
    • of the Earth should be calculated according to the following procedure: equired PFD reduction in dB. Rules with Regard to the 3650-3700 MHz Government Transfer Band, First Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 15 FCC Rcd 20488, 20538 (2000). Intelsat Application, Attachment at 10, and Intelsat Amendment, Exhibit D. Intelsat Application, Attachment at 10-11. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969). 17/24 GHz BSS Report and Order, 22 FCC Rcd at 8885 (para. 106). Intelsat Application, Attachment at 10; Intelsat Amendment, Technical Description at 11. Intelsat Application, Attachment at 10. In 1983, the Commission established a two-degree orbital spacing policy to maximize the number of in-orbit satellites serving the United
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1132A1_Rcd.pdf
    • to be 0.65, as stated in Section 25.224. 2747 C.F.R. � 25.202(g). 28Amendment of the Commission's Rules with Regard to the 3650-3700 MHz Government Transfer Band, First Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 15 FCC Rcd 20488, 20538 (2000). 29Intelsat Application, Attachment at 10, and Intelsat Amendment, Exhibit D. 30Intelsat Application, Attachment at 10-11. 3147 C.F.R. � 1.3. 32WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969). 7063 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-1132 case-by-case basis.33Therecord suggests that Intelsat will be able to coordinate its limited term LEOP operations with all potentially-affected space station operators.34 We find that Intelsat has shown that special circumstances exist --specifically: 1) the lack of 17/24 GHz TT&C facilities around the world;
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1163A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1163A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1163A1.txt
    • it is appropriate to grant the requested waiver. This Order therefore grants Geemarc's waiver request. Geemarc may therefore proceed with either TCB certification or Self-Declaration of Conformity pursuant to Part 68 of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.141 and 0.361 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the request for waiver of section 68.317(f) for Models AMPLIPOWER40, AMPLIPOWER50, and AMPLIPOWER60+, filed by Geemarc Telecom International Ltd., IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: (1) the volume reset override switch shall be labeled as such and located on the telephone in such a way as to not be accessible to
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1205A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1205A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1205A1.txt
    • plant balance. See Petition at 6, note 3. See id. at 6. See id. See id. at 6 (citing Amendment of Rules and Policies Governing Pole Attachments, CS Docket No. 97-98, Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 6453, 6487, para. 64 (2000) (Pole Attachment Order)). Generally, the Commission may waive its rules for good cause shown. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. See Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). In addition, the Commission may take into account considerations of hardship, equity, or more effective implementation of overall policy on an individual
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1210A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1210A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1210A1.txt
    • it is appropriate to grant the requested waiver. This Order therefore grants Geemarc's waiver request. Geemarc may therefore proceed with either TCB certification or Self-Declaration of Conformity pursuant to Part 68 of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.141 and 0.361 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the request for waiver of section 68.317(f) for Model AMPLIDECT 260, filed by Geemarc Telecom International Ltd., IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: (1) the volume reset override switch shall be labeled as such and located on the telephone in such a way as to not be accessible to accidental engagement;
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1215A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1215A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1215A1.txt
    • to authorize work on USAC's 2008 annual audit on February 13, 2009, USAC asserts that it could not meet the April 15, 2009 audit filing deadline. Accordingly, USAC seeks a waiver of section 54.717(f) of the Commission's rules for the audit period ending December 31, 2008 and an extension of the deadline until July 1, 2009. discussion Pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, the Commission may waive any provision of its rules if it determines that good cause has been shown. We conclude that good cause exists to grant USAC a limited waiver of the draft audit filing deadline in section 54.717(f) of the Commission's rules. USAC asserts in its waiver request that work on the 2008 audit now
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1259A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1259A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1259A1.txt
    • the limited waiver granted here, we find that regulation pursuant to our Part 61 rules is sufficient to address any potential issues that may arise concerning the effects of the waiver on the 2009 annual filing. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 201-205 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 201-205, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, section 61.42(g) of the Commission's rules IS WAIVED for TIPToP service offered by AT&T with respect to AT&T's 2009 annual access tariff filing requirements under section 61.43 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1260A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1260A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1260A1.txt
    • price caps, this could create ``headroom'' within a service category or band that could result in changes to the rates of other less competitive services, and such an outcome would not be in the public interest. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 201-205 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 201-205, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, section 61.42(g) of the Commission's rules IS WAIVED for Advanced Services in Hawaiian Telcom, Inc.'s Tariff FCC No. 2, with respect to Hawaiian's 2009 annual access tariff filing requirements under section 61.43 of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1262A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1262A1.txt
    • 08-185, Order, 23 FCC Rcd 17867 (WCB 2008) (consolidating proceedings). 47 C.F.R. � 51.807(g). Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions in the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Interconnection between Local Exchange Carriers and Commercial Mobile Radio Service Providers, CC Docket Nos. 96-98, 95-185, First Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 15499, 16131-32, para. 1295 (1996) (subsequent history omitted). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see also 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). In addition, the Commission may take into account considerations of hardship, equity, or more effective implementation of overall policy on an individual basis. WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969), aff'd, WAIT Radio v.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1296A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1296A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1296A1.txt
    • found at http://www.usac.org/hc/tools/filing-tool/default.aspx. We encourage filers to use any and all methods they deem necessary to ensure that their filings are timely received. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that this order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver of section 54.809 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.809, filed by CENTENNIAL COMMUNICATIONS CORP., IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. ��1.102(b)(1), this
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1319A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1319A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1319A1.txt
    • Part 4 information is similar in many ways to the information that we collect in DIRS, we do not believe such communications providers should be required to provide Part 4 information, and that it is sufficient for them to submit reports in DIRS that provide the status of their communications infrastructure in the area defined by the DIRS activation. Section 1.3 of our rules authorizes the Commission to waive a Commission rule for good cause shown. If the two waiver conditions described above are met (i.e. the outage occurs in the DIRS-defined geographic area and the communications provider suffering the outage submits new or updated DIRS reports at least every 24 hours), the Commission will be apprised of the status of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1322A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1322A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1322A1.txt
    • 47 C.F.R. � 54.706. See Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Sixteenth Order on Reconsideration, CC Docket No. 96-45, Eighth Report and Order, CC Docket No. 96-45, Sixth Report and Order, Docket No. 96-262, 15 FCC Rcd 1679, 1687-1692, paras. 17-29 (1999) (Fifth Circuit Remand Order). Generally, the Commission's rules may be waived for good cause shown. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). In addition, the Commission may take into account considerations of hardship, equity, or more effective implementation of overall policy on an individual basis.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1323A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1323A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1323A1.txt
    • TRS users. We believe that the extension granted here reasonably balances the concerns raised in the Joint Petition against the public safety implications of further delay. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 4(i) and 225 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 225, and sections 0.141, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, 1.3, that this Order is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the June 30, 2009, Internet-based TRS registration deadline is EXTENDED UNTIL NOVEMBER 12, 2009. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition to Extend Relay Registration Deadline, filed by AT&T, Inc., CAC, CSDVRS, LLC, Hamilton Relay, Inc., Purple Communications, Inc., Snap
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1387A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1387A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1387A1.txt
    • asserted that a further extension of the waiver would be warranted based on its financial situation. WOW has demonstrated that its financial condition has weakened in the months since the release of the July 2008 Financial Hardship Order. In light of the further deterioration of Petitioner's financial condition, we conclude that a limited extension of waiver is justified under Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's rules. While we continue to believe that ``[i]ncreased demand due to common reliance should reduce the cost of compliant set-top boxes, and the financial burdens Petitioners face should dissipate,'' WOW has demonstrated sufficiently that the cost of compliance would impose an undue hardship on WOW in light of the fact that its financial situation has
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1388A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1388A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1388A1.txt
    • asserted that a further extension of the waiver would be warranted based on RCN's financial situation. RCN has demonstrated that its financial condition has weakened in the months since the release of the July 2008 Financial Hardship Order. In light of the further deterioration of Petitioner's financial condition, we conclude that a limited extension of waiver is justified under Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's rules. While we continue to believe that ``[i]ncreased demand due to common reliance should reduce the cost of compliant set-top boxes, and the financial burdens Petitioners face should dissipate,'' RCN has demonstrated sufficiently that the cost of compliance would impose an undue hardship on RCN in light of the fact that its financial situation has
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1422A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1422A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1422A1.txt
    • it is appropriate to grant the requested waiver. This Order therefore grants Primatronix's waiver request. Primatronix may therefore proceed with either TCB certification or Self-Declaration of Conformity pursuant to Part 68 of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.141 and 0.361 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the request for waiver of section 68.317(f) for Model HerPlus 317ci, filed by Primatronix LTD, IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: (1) the volume reset override switch shall be labeled as such and located on the telephone in such a way as to not be accessible to accidental engagement; (2) a
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1442A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1442A1.txt
    • C.F.R. � 101.17(a). See 47 C.F.R. � 101.17(b). 47 C.F.R. � 1.946(e)(1). 47 C.F.R. � 1.946(e)(2),(3). 47 C.F.R. � 1.925. Id.; see also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990); WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969), aff'd, 459 F.2d 1203 (1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972); 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See IDT Spectrum, LLC Request for Waiver of Time to Meet Coverage Requirements and Extension of License Period, Order on Reconsideration and Memorandum Opinion and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 12005 (WTB 2008) (IDT Construction Extension Order); ART Licensing Corporation Requests for Waiver, Extension of Time to Meet Coverage Requirements, and Extension of License Period, Order on Reconsideration and Memorandum Opinion
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1442A1_Rcd.pdf
    • 8See47 C.F.R. � 101.17(a). 9See47 C.F.R. � 101.17(b). 1047 C.F.R. � 1.946(e)(1). 1147 C.F.R. � 1.946(e)(2),(3). 1247 C.F.R. � 1.925. 13Id.; see also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990); WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969), aff'd, 459 F.2d 1203 (1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972); 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. 14SeeIDT Spectrum, LLC Request for Waiver of Time to Meet Coverage Requirements and Extension of License Period, Order on Reconsideration and Memorandum Opinion and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 12005 (WTB 2008) (IDT Construction Extension Order); ART Licensing Corporation Requests for Waiver, Extension of Time to Meet Coverage Requirements, and Extension of License Period, Order on Reconsideration and Memorandum Opinion and
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1461A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1461A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1461A1.txt
    • For further information, please contact Dana Wilson, Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau, Disability Rights Office, at (202) 418-2247 (voice), (202) 418-7898 (TTY), or e-mail at Dana.Wilson@fcc.gov. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 2, and 225 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 152, and 225, and sections 0.141, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.316 & 1.3, this Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that section 64.604(a)(4) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 64.604(a)(4), to the extent that it requires traditional TRS Providers to implement a system to automatically and immediately call an appropriate PSAP when receiving an emergency 711-dialed call via an interconnected
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1498A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1498A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1498A1.txt
    • and to allow it to retain its current regulatory status until the Commission concludes its review of the all-or-nothing rule in the MAG Second Further Notice. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91, and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91 and 0.291, that the Amended Petition for waiver of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 61.41 filed by Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc., IS GRANTED, to the extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1567A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1567A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1567A1.txt
    • of the program and will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the request for waiver of 47 C.F.R. �54.507(c) filed by Minford Local Schools IS GRANTED and its application IS REMANDED to USAC for further consideration consistent with this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1571A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1571A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1571A1.txt
    • year ago, James Cable filed a plan for compliance with the integration ban, but has subsequently filed information that indicates its financial condition has weakened in the months since the release of the July 2008 Financial Hardship Order. In light of the further deterioration of Petitioner's financial condition, we conclude that a limited extension of waiver is justified under Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's rules. On April 20, 2009, James Cable submitted updated financial information to demonstrate that it still remains in poor financial condition. In order to demonstrate its financial condition, James Cable submitted a Cash Flow Statement to demonstrate its negative cash flows for 2008, indicating that the company is spending more cash than it is earning.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1572A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1572A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1572A1.txt
    • other than their MVPD. Although the cable industry has challenged the lawfulness of the integration ban on three separate occasions, in each of those cases the D.C. Circuit denied those petitions. In limited circumstances, however, operators may be eligible for waiver of the integration ban. discussion Petitioner makes its request for waiver pursuant to the Financial Hardship Order and Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's rules. In light of Petitioner's demonstrated financial hardship and consistent with the Financial Hardship Order, we conclude that a limited grant of its Waiver Request until July 1, 2010 is justified under Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's rules. We therefore grant Petitioner a limited waiver of the integration ban for the Subject Boxes.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1578A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1578A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1578A1.txt
    • Requirements, Minimum Opening Bids, Upfront Payments and Other Procedures for Auction 79,'' Public Notice, DA 09-810, 24 FCC Rcd 4448 � 64 (2009) (``Auction 79 Procedures Public Notice''). See Auction 79 Procedures Public Notice at � 94. 47 C.F.R. � 1.2106(a); see also Part 1 Fifth Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 15316-17 �� 40-42. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 1.925. Part 1 Fifth Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 15317. Id., 15 FCC Rcd at 15316-17. Id. at 15316. The Commission has determined that a policy of strict adherence to payment deadlines is necessary to serve the public interests of integrity, fairness and efficiency of the auction process. See Delta Radio, Inc. v. FCC, 387 F.3d 897,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1578A1_Rcd.pdf
    • enforced strictly.10 Requirements, Minimum Opening Bids, Upfront Payments and Other Procedures for Auction 79," Public Notice, DA 09-810, 24 FCC Rcd 4448 � 64 (2009) ("Auction 79 Procedures Public Notice"). 4See Auction 79 Procedures Public Noticeat � 94. 547 C.F.R. � 1.2106(a); see also Part 1 Fifth Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 15316-17 �� 40-42. 6See47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 1.925. 7Part 1FifthReport and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 15317. 8Id., 15 FCCRcd at 15316-17. 9Id. at 15316. 10The Commission has determined that a policy of strict adherence to payment deadlines is necessary to serve the public interests of integrity, fairness and efficiency of the auction process. See Delta Radio, Inc. v. FCC, 387 F.3d 897, 901, 903 (D.C.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1625A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1625A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1625A1.txt
    • Pegasus for DIRECTV is the type of agreement that Section 25.158(c) was designed to prohibit. Thus, we find that an exception here would swallow the rule. Waiver of the Rule In light of our determination that the rule prohibits the substitution of DIRECTV for Pegasus, we review whether DIRECTV has demonstrated an adequate basis for waiver of Section 25.158(c). Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules authorizes the Commission to waive its rules for ``good cause shown.'' Waiver is appropriate only if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule and if such deviation would better serve the public interest than would strict adherence to the general rule. Generally, the Commission may grant a waiver of its rules in a particular
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1625A1_Rcd.pdf
    • Pegasus for DIRECTV is the typeof agreement that Section 25.158(c) was designed to prohibit. Thus, we find that an exception here would swallow the rule. B. Waiver of the Rule 14.In light of our determination that the rule prohibits the substitution of DIRECTV for Pegasus, we review whether DIRECTV has demonstrated an adequate basis for waiver of Section 25.158(c). Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules authorizes the Commission to waive its rules for "good cause shown."38Waiver is appropriate only if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule and if such deviation would better serve the public interest than would strict adherence to the general rule.39Generally, the Commission may grant a waiver of its rules in a particular case only
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-170A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-170A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-170A1.txt
    • Governors and public utility commissions of all of the affected states. Furthermore, FairPoint asserts that the present and future public convenience and necessity will not be adversely affected by the proposed termination of service on January 30, 2009, because customers have been provided with adequate notice and the public has access to comparable services at competitive prices. Pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, the Commission may grant a waiver of its rules upon a showing of ``good cause.'' Section 1.3 thus allows the Commission to grant a waiver if special circumstances warrant a departure from the general rule, and that departure serves the public interest. We find that due to the special circumstances present here, departure from the general
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1728A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1728A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1728A1.txt
    • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 09-1728 Released: July 31, 2009 MEDIA BUREAU ACTION MEDIA BUREAU SEEKS COMMENT ON BAJA BROADBAND'S INTEGRATION BAN WAIVER REQUEST CSR-7111-Z Comment Date: August 20, 2009 Reply Comment Date: August 31, 2009 Baja Broadband Operating Company, LLC (``Baja Broadband'' or ``Petitioner'') has filed a request pursuant to Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's rules, for limited waiver of the prohibition set forth in Section 76.1204(a)(1) of the Commission's rules on offering navigation devices that perform both conditional access and other functions. Baja Broadband seeks a waiver that will allow Baja Broadband to place in service refurbished integrated navigation devices, including high-definition (``HD'') and digital video recorder (``DVR'') devices.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1734A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1734A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1734A1.txt
    • U.S.C. �� 151-154, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.507(a)(2) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 54.507(a)(2), that this order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that section 54.507(a)(2) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.507(a)(2), IS WAIVED to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.102(b)(1), that this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Julie A. Veach Acting
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1735A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1735A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1735A1.txt
    • served by granting Time Warner's request. Additionally, Time Warner and Media General have reached an agreement settling Media General's three Emergency Enforcement Complaints regarding the discontinuance of carriage of WBTW, WNCT-TV, and WCBD-TV. Accordingly, we grant Media General's requests to withdraw the complaints, and dismiss the subject complaints with prejudice. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 76.7, the request for waiver filed by Time Warner Cable Inc. of Sections 76.1601, 76.1603(b) and 76.1603(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 76.1601, 76.1603(b), and 76.1603(c), IS GRANTED as discussed herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Emergency Enforcement Complaints of Media General Communications Holdings, LLC, regarding stations
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1807A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1807A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1807A1.txt
    • TeleQuality Communications, Inc., to Thomas Buckley, Federal Communications Commission, WC Docket No. 02-60 at 1 (filed July 21, 2009) (TeleQuality Ex Parte Letter). Request for Waiver at 9. Id.; supra para. 3. 47 C.F.R. � 54.611; supra para. 3. The Commission may waive any provision of its rules on its own motion and for good cause shown. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. A rule may be waived where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). In addition, the Commission may take into account considerations of hardship, equity, or more effective implementation of overall policy on an individual basis. WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1811A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1811A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1811A1.txt
    • Journal Co. v. FCC, 351 F.2d 824 (D.C. Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 967 (1966). Petition at 1. Id. Id. AM Auction Public Notice, 20 FCC Rcd at 10566; see also 47 C.F.R. � 73.3568(a)(1) and Green Valley Broadcasters, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 19 FCC Rcd 13341, 13345-46 (2004) See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (``Northeast Cellular''). In addition, the Commission may take into account considerations of hardship, equity, or more effective implementation of overall policy on an individual basis.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1854A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1854A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1854A1.txt
    • Evolution Order because the Subject Boxes are only capable of doing what is necessary to make digital cable programming viewable on analog television sets. For this reason we conclude that, with respect to the Subject Boxes, Petitioners have justified three-year waivers of the integration ban under the standard set forth in the 2005 Deferral Order, the Evolution Order, and Sections 1.3 or 76.7 of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, we grant the Waiver Requests, and, until three years from the release of this order, any cable operator may choose to deploy the Subject Boxes without requesting a waiver of Section 76.1204(a)(1)'s prohibition on the deployment of navigation devices ``that perform both conditional access and other functions in a single integrated device.'' ordering
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1862A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1862A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1862A1.txt
    • the escrowed shares, such as additional securities of the company. Any such additional securities become part of the escrowed property. Id.; see also id. at Article 1, Section 1.1(e) (Company Distributions) (as amended by Amendment No. 1). Id. at Article 1, Section 1.2 (Title, Voting Rights; Distributions and Investments) (as amended by Amendment No. 2). Id. at Article 1, Section 1.3 (Disbursements). Id. The normal indicia of the beneficial ownership of a corporation include ``voting rights and distributions of dividends, and generally reflects the amount of shareholder capital contributed to the corporation.'' See Applications of NextWave Personal Communications, Inc. for Various C-Block Broadband PCS Licenses, Memorandum Opinion and Order, DA 97-328, 12 FCC Rcd 2030, 2046, � 36 (citing Application of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1862A1_Rcd.pdf
    • to the escrowed shares, such as additional securities of the company. Any such additional securities become part of the escrowed property. Id.; see alsoid. at Article 1, Section 1.1(e) (Company Distributions) (as amended by Amendment No. 1). 54Id. at Article 1, Section 1.2 (Title, Voting Rights; Distributions and Investments) (as amended by Amendment No. 2). 55Id. at Article 1, Section 1.3 (Disbursements). 56Id. 57The normal indicia of the beneficial ownership of a corporation include "voting rights anddistributions of dividends, and generally reflects the amount of shareholder capital contributed to the corporation." SeeApplications (continued....) 10961 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-1862 Under these circumstances, we find for purposes of our section 310(b) analysis that Harbinger is the beneficial ownerof the shares of SkyTerra
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1966A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1966A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1966A1.txt
    • harmful interference. On June 19, 2009, L-3 SafeView withdrew the above request for authority to continue to install the ProVision 100 at a rate of 200 new installations per year; instead, it asks that unused portions of the original limits from the first two years be ``rolled over'' into subsequent years. We are authorized to grant a waiver under Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules if the petitioner demonstrates good cause for such action. Good cause, in turn, may be found and a waiver granted ``where particular facts would make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest.'' To make this public interest determination, the waiver cannot undermine the purposes of the rule, and there must be a stronger public interest benefit
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A2.txt
    • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit ATTACHMENT1 toFCCPublicNoticeDA09-1994 Recommendationsapprovedat 1September2009Meetingof theAdvisoryCommitteefor the2011WorldRadiocommunicationConference MaritimeAeronauticalandRadar Services 2 DOCUMENTWAC/046(Ol.09.09) UNITEDSTATESOFAMERICA DRAFTPROPOSALSFORTHEWORKOFTHECONFERENCE AgendaItem1.3: Toconsiderspectrumrequirementsandpossibleregulatoryactions,including allocations,inordertosupportthesafeoperationofunmannedaircraftsystems(VAS),basedon theresultsofITV-Rstudies,inaccordancewithResolution421(WRC-07) BackgroundInformation:Unmannedaircraftsystems(UASs)enabletheremotepilotingof aircraftovershortrangeandsignificantdistanceswithinorout-of-sightoftheremotepilot. Theseflightoperationscurrentlytakeplaceinsegregatedairspace,toensurethesafetyoftheair vehicleandotherairspaceusers. SomeadministrationsexpectdeploymentofUASsthroughouttheairspacestructure.AsUAS deploymentincreases,itwillbeimpracticalforsomeuserstodeployinsegregatedairspace. SomeUASswillneedtointegratewiththecurrentairspaceusersinasafeandseamlessmanner. Toaccomplishintegrationintonon-segregatedairspace,UASswillrequirehighintegrity communicationlinksbetweentheunmannedaircraft(UA)andremotecontrolcenterscapableof relayingthenecessaryairtrafficcontrol(ATC)messagesandflightcriticalaircraftinformation. TheUASpilotwillneedsenseandavoidfunctionsforsituationalawareness. TheInternationalCivilAviationOrganization(ICAO)futurecommunicationsstudymaybeable toidentifytechnologieswithsomecapabilitytomeettherequirementsforcommandandcontrol, includingtherelayingofATCcommunications.Theaeronauticalmobile(R)service(AM(R)S) andaeronauticalmobile-satellite(R)service(AMS(R)S)aretheappropriateservicesto accommodatecommandandcontrolandATCradiocommunications.TheITU-Risexamining existingaeronauticalallocationstosatisfyspectrumrequirementspriortostudyingnew allocations. Command&Control Innon-segregatedairspace,theremotepilotmustreliablymonitorthestatusoftheUA, passcontrolinstructionstotheirUA,andinteractwiththeappropriateairtraffic controllersmonitoringairspacewithinwhichtheirUAisflying.Aline-of-sightlink mightprovidethesecapabilitiesforUAflyingandmaneuveringinalocalizedarea.A combinationofaterrestrialradioandsatellitenetworkcouldprovidethesecapabilitiesto UAflyingtrans-horizon. RelayofAirTrafficControl(ATC)Communications SafeoperationofmannedorunmannedaircraftdependsonATCcommunications.Pilots actbasedonATCinstructions.Whenthepilotisremote(notintheaircraft)thepilotand ATCmustmaintainacommunicationchanneltorelayinformationfromaradiointhe aircrafttothepilotontheground.Earlyconceptsassumethatthisfunction,ifdigitized, couldbepartofthecommandandcontrollinks. SenseandAvoid ThesafeflightoperationofUAnecessitatesadvancedtechniquestodetectandtrack nearbyaircraft,terrain,andobstaclestonavigation.Unmannedaircraftmustavoidthese objectsinamannerequivalenttothatofamannedaircraft.Theremotepilotwillneedto 3 beawareoftheenvironmentwithinwhichtheaircraftisoperating,beabletoidentifythe potentialthreatstothecontinuedsafeoperationoftheaircraft,andtaketheappropriate action.Theradiodeterminationserviceallocationscouldpotentiallyaccommodatethe senseandavoidfunction.TheITU-Risexaminingexistingaeronauticalradionavigation service(ARNS)allocationsforsuitablebandwidthpriortostudyingnewARNS allocations.TheUASindustryisstudyingthesuitabilityofvarioustechnologiesfor senseandavoid. Payload Resolution421(WRC-07)Resolves1specificallyexcludestheallocationofspectrumat WRC-llforpayloadapplications.However,invitesITU-R3doescallforthe developmentofanITU-Rreportorrecommendationonhowtoaccommodatethe radiocommunicationrequirementsforUASpayloads.Thepurposeofthisagendaitemis nottoseeknewspectrumallocationstomeetpayloadrequirements. Thisagendaitemseekstoidentifythespectrumrequirementsnecessarytosupportthesafe operationofUASsincurrentandfutureairspacestructures.SpectrumforUASforsafetyand regularityofflightinnon-segregatedairspacecanbeaccommodatedin""'illneedAM(R)S, AMS(R)S,orARNSallocationsorinotherallocationsthatcanmeetperformancerequirements establishedbyICAO/ITU-RRecommendation.inordertoreceivethesufficientstatusand protectionfromharmfulinterference. The5030-5091MHzbandisanappropriatebandtosatisfytheterrestrial,line-of-sight, spectrumrequirementsforthecommandandcontrolofUASsinnon-segregatedairspace.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1994A3.txt
    • NOC USNAI1.19/2 Reasons:NochangestoArticle5(Frequencyallocations)oftheRadioRegulationsarenecessaryto enabletheintroductionofSDRandCRStechnologies.ThisisconsistentwithCPMMethodA(no regulatorychangesrequiredforSDR). 7 UNITEDSTATESOFAMERICA DRAFTPROPOSALSFORTHEWORKOFTHECONFERENCE AgendaItem1.22: ExaminetheejfecIofemissionsjromshort-rangedeviceson radiocommunicationservices,inaccordancewithResolution953(WRC-07) BackgroundInformation:TheUnitedStatesimplementsatlexibleregulatoryregimeintheISM andcertainotherbands,settingbasictechnicalrequirementsthatfacilitatespectrumharingamong license-exemptandshort-rangedeviceswhileminimizingconstraintsonproductdeigns.This regimehasledtotheimplementationofavarietyoflicense-exemptandshort-rangedevices. TheUnitedStatesbelievesthattheregulationofshort-rangedevicesisprimarilyanationalmatter. Basedonexperiencewithimplementationofshort-rangedevices,thereisnoneedforany modificationtotheinternationalRadioRegulationstoaccommodatethem. PI'oposal: ARTICLE1 Termsanddefinitions NOC USA/AI1.22/1 Reasons:Theregulationofshort-rangedevicesisprimarilyanationalmatteranddoesnotrequire anymodificationstotheRadioRegulations.Thereisnoneedforinternationalregulationofsuch devices. ARTICLE5 Frequencyallocations USNAI1.22/2 Reasons:Theregulationofshort-rangedevicesisprimarilyanationalmatteranddoesnotrequi.re anymodificationstotheRadioRegulations.Thereisnoneedforinternationalregulationofsuch devices. 8 DocumentWAC/038(Ol.09.09) Mr.JohnGiusti ActingChiefoftheInternationalBureau FederalCommunicationsCommission 445121hStreetSW Washington,DC20554 DearMr.Giusti: TheNationalTelecommunicationsandInformationAdministration(NTIA)onbehalfofthe ExecutiveBranchAgencies,approvesthereleaseofdraftExecutiveBranchproposalforWRC- II.agendaiteml.3.NTIAproposesamodi11cationtothe5030-5 091MHzbandtosupportthe safeoperationofunmannedaircraftsystems.TheFederalagenciesmayhaveadditionalinputon proposalsforthisagendaitemasstudieswithintheInternationalTelecommunicationsUnion progress. NTIAconsideredtheFederalagencies'inputtowardthedevelopmentofU.S.proposalsfor WRC-ll.NTlAforwardsthispackageforyourconsiderationandreviewbyyourWRC-1.1 AdvisoryCommittee.Dr.DarleneDrazenovichistheprimarycontactfrommystaff. Sincerely, (OriginalSignedJu.ly24,2009) KarlB.Nebbia AsociateAdministrator OfficeofSpectrumManagement Enclosure 9 UNITEDSTATESOFAMERICA DRAFTPROPOSALSFORTHEWORKOFTHECONI?ERENCE AgendaItem 1.3:Toconsiderspectrumrequirementsandpossibleregulatoryactions,including allocations,inordertosupportthesafeoperationofunmannedaircrajisystems(VAS),basedonIhe resultsofITV-Rstudies,inaccordancewith.Resolution427(WRC-07) BackgroundInformation:Unmannedaircraftsystems(UASs)enabletheremotepilotingof aircraftovershortrangeandsignificantdistanceswithinorout-of-ightoftheremotepilot.These flightoperationscurrentlytakeplaceinsegregatedairspace,toensurethesafetyoftheairvehicle andotherairspaceusers. SomeadministrationsexpectdeploymentofUASsthroughouttheairspacestructure.AVAS deploymentincreases,itwillbeimpracticalforsomeuserstodeployinsegregatedairspace.Some UASswilJneedtointegratewiththecurrentairspaceusersinasafeandseamlessmanner.To accomplishintegrationintonon-segregatedairspace,VASswilJrequirehighintegrity communicationlinksbetweentheunmannedaircraft(VA)andremotecontrolcenterscapableof relayingthenecessaryaij'tmfficcontrol(ATC)messagesandflightcriticalaircraftinformation.The VASpilotwillneedsenseandavoidfunctionsforsituationalawareness. TheInternationalCivilAviationOrganization(ICAO)futurecommunicationsstudymaybeableto identifytechnologieswithsomecapabilitytomeettherequirementsforcommandandcontrol, includingtherelayingofATCcommunications.Theaeronauticalmobile(R)service(AM(R)S)and aeronauticalmobile-satellite(R)service(AMS(R)S)aretheappropriateservicestoaccommodate commandandcontrolandATCradiocommunications.TheITV-Risexaminingexisting aeronauticalaJlocationstosatisfyspectrumrequirementspriortostudyingnewallocations. Command&Control Innon-segregatedairspace,theremotepilotmustreliablymonitorthestatusoftheVA, passcontrolinstructionstotheirVA,andinteractwiththeappropriateairtrafficcontrollers monitoringairspacewithinwhichtheirVAisflying.Aline-of-sightlinkmightprovide thesecapabilitiesforUAflyingandmaneuveringinalocalizedarea.Acombinationofa terrestrialradioandsatellitenetworkcouldprovidethesecapabilitiestoVAflyingtrans- horizon. RelayofAirTrafficControl(ATC)Commullicatiolls SafeoperationofmannedorunmannedaircraftdependsonATCcommunications.Pilots actbasedonATCinstructions.Whenthepilotisremote(notintheaircraft)thepilotand ATCmustmaintainacommunicationchanneltorelayinformationfromaradiointhe aircrafttothepilotontheground.Earlyconceptsassumethatthisfunction,ifdigitized, couldbepartofthecommandandcontrollinks. SenseandAvoid ThesafeflightoperationofVAnecessitatesadvancedtechniquestodetectandtracknearby aircraft,terrain,andobstaclestonavigation.Unmannedaircraftmustavoidtheseobjectsin 10 amannerequivalenttothatofamannedaircraft.Theremotepilotwillneedtobeawareof theenvironmentwithinwhichtheaircraftisoperating,beabletoidentifythepotential threatstothecontinuedsafeoperationoftheaircraft,andtaketheappropriateaction.The radiodeterminationserviceallocationscouldpotentiallyaccommodatethesenseandavoid function.TheITU-Risexaminingexistingaeronauticalradionavigationservice(ARNS) allocationsforsuitablebandwidthpriortostudyingnewARNSallocations.TheUAS industryisstudyingthesuitabilityofvarioustechnologiesforsenseandavoid. Payload Resolution421(WRC-07) Resolves1specificallyexcludestheallocationofspectrumat WRC-IIforpayloadapplications.However, invitesITU-R3doescallforthedevelopment ofanITU-Rreportorrecommendationonhowtoaccommodatetheradiocommunication requirementsforUASpayloads.Thepurposeofthisagendaitemisnottoseeknew spectrumallocationstomeetpayloadrequirements. Thisagendaitemseekstoidentifythespectrumrequirementsnecessarytosupportthesafeoperation ofUASsincurrentandfutureairspacestructures.SpectrumforUASforsafetyandregularityof flightinnon-segregatedairspacewillneedAM(R)S,AMS(R)S,orARNSallocationinorderto receivethesufficientstatusandprotectionfromharmfulinterference. The5030-5091MHzbandisanappropriatebandtosatisfytheterrestrial,line-of-sight,spectrum requirementsforthecommandandconu'olofUASsinnon-segregatedairspace.Currently,thereis minimumusageinthisbandworldwide.Thelackofanexistingorplannedmicrowavelanding systemdeploymentintheUnitedStatesensuresavailabilityofappropriateaeronauticalspectrulllfor aterresu-ialline-of-sightVASsysteminthe5030-5091MHzband.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2042A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2042A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2042A1.txt
    • 47 C.F.R. � 54.706. See Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Sixteenth Order on Reconsideration, CC Docket No. 96-45, Eighth Report and Order, CC Docket No. 96-45, Sixth Report and Order, Docket No. 96-262, 15 FCC Rcd 1679, 1687-1692, paras. 17-29 (1999) (Fifth Circuit Remand Order). Generally, the Commission's rules may be waived for good cause shown. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). In addition, the Commission may take into account considerations of hardship, equity, or more effective implementation of overall policy on an individual basis.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2059A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2059A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2059A1.txt
    • it is appropriate to grant the requested waiver. This Order therefore grants ClearSounds' waiver request. ClearSounds may therefore proceed with either TCB certification or Self-Declaration of Conformity pursuant to Part 68 of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.141 and 0.361 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the request for waiver of section 68.317(f) for Models CSC1000 and XL-2098FDP, filed by ClearSounds Communications, Inc., IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: (1) the volume reset override switch shall be labeled as such and located on the telephone in such a way as to not be accessible to accidental engagement;
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2060A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2060A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2060A1.txt
    • it is appropriate to grant the requested waiver. This Order therefore grants Clarity's waiver request. Clarity may therefore proceed with either TCB certification or Self-Declaration of Conformity pursuant to Part 68 of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.141 and 0.361 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the request for waiver of section 68.317(f) for Models W425P and W425D, filed by Clarity, A Division of Plantronics, Inc., IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: (1) the volume reset override switch shall be labeled as such and located on the telephone in such a way as to not be accessible
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2088A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2088A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2088A1.txt
    • provide assistance to regional planners. A copy of the 700 MHz Regional Planning Guidebook is available at the NPSTC website at http://www.npstc.org/nccsubcom.jsp. See Plan, Section 1.7 - Notification Process at 12. Id. Meeting notifications were published by FCC public notice, and by placement in the Association of Public Safety Communications Officials, Inc. MRT and Radio Resource magazines. See Plan, Section 1.3 - Authority and Administrative Bylaws 2-6. See Plan, Appendix B - Membership List at B1-B2. See Plan, Appendix A - Initial Meeting Notice, Minutes and Letter of Assignment; see also Plan, Appendix C - List of Meetings Held at C1; Plan, Appendix D - Meeting Minutes and Announcements at D1-D74. See Plan, Section 3 - Allocation of General Use Spectrum
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2089A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2089A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2089A1.txt
    • of Inquiry, 24 FCC Rcd 4342 (2009) (National Broadband Plan NOI). . . See id. at 4381 � 125. In permit-but-disclose proceedings, written ex parte presentations are permissible but must be disclosed in the record of the proceeding. Oral ex parte presentations containing new data or arguments must also be disclosed. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (rules may be waived for good cause shown). We note that any comments that are filed on Blogband but which relate to dockets other than GN Docket No. 09-51 will not be considered in the other dockets, so as to assure fairness to other parties in those dockets. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2115A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2115A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2115A1.txt
    • 2009 Pleading Cycle Established for STi Prepaid, LLC Petition regarding customer authentication provisions of cpni rules CC Docket No. 96-115 WC Docket No. 04-36 Comment Date: October 26, 2009 Reply Comment Date: November 10, 2009 The Wireline Competition Bureau seeks comment on a petition filed on August 4, 2009 by STi Prepaid, LLC (STi Prepaid) pursuant to sections 1.2 and 1.3 of the Commission's rules. STi Prepaid asks the Commission to issue a declaratory ruling confirming that telecommunications carriers providing service via prepaid calling cards satisfy the requirement to authenticate a customer under the Commission's customer proprietary network information (CPNI) rules when the customer can provide the personal identification number (PIN) associated with the long distance services and related CPNI. In
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2121A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2121A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2121A1.txt
    • its formal network disclosure to reflect this change. All of Qwest's other planned network changes under Qwest Disclosure Number 698 shall proceed as usual. Ordering CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), and 251 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), and 251, and pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, Qwest's petition is GRANTED to the extent provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon E. Gillett Chief Wireline Competition Bureau Qwest Corporation Petition for Emergency Waiver of Section 51.333(b)(2) of the Commission's Rules, WC Docket No. 09-171 (September 24, 2009) (Qwest Petition). See 47 C.F.R. � 51.333. Letter from Melissa
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2150A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2150A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2150A1.txt
    • Centennial. Therefore, Centennial's concerns regarding inclusion of this data in the competitive ETC capped amounts for these states are moot as well. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, the petition to extend the deadline for submitting changes to the March 2008 data used to cap high-cost universal service support for competitive ETCs, filed by Centennial Communications Corp., IS DISMISSED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. ��1.102(b)(1),
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2151A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2151A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2151A1.txt
    • Centennial's revenues in Puerto Rico for 2004 and 2005 totaled $786 million. See Centennial Communications, 2008 Annual Report at page 1. See Universal Service Fund, 2008 Submission of 2007 Study Results by the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., (Oct. 1, 2008). 47 C.F.R. � 54.307(a). Generally, the Commission may waive its rules for good cause shown. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. See Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). In addition, the Commission may take into account considerations of hardship, equity, or more effective implementation of overall policy on an individual
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2164A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2164A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2164A1.txt
    • Order because the Subject Boxes are only capable of doing what is necessary to make digital cable programming viewable on analog television sets. For this reason we conclude that, with respect to the Subject Boxes, Petitioner has justified a three-year waiver of the integration ban under the standard set forth in the 2005 Deferral Order, the Evolution Order, and Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, we grant the Waiver Request, and, until three years from the release of this order, any cable operator may choose to deploy the Subject Boxes without requesting a waiver of Section 76.1204(a)(1)'s prohibition on the deployment of navigation devices ``that perform both conditional access and other functions in a single integrated device.'' ordering
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2242A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2242A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2242A1.txt
    • and Weld remain eligible to apply for support from the schools and libraries mechanism in future funding years. III. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the requests for waivers filed by Amy Biehl Charter High School, Albuquerque, New Mexico, and Weld Library District, Greely, Colorado, ARE DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.102(b)(1), this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2245A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2245A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2245A1.txt
    • we deny the Request for Waiver or Review and we uphold USAC's decision to recover all funds disbursed to Exigent in E-rate funding year 2001. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the request for waiver or review filed by Exigent Technologies on August 31, 2004, is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.102(b)(1), that this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jennifer K.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2246A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2246A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2246A1.txt
    • will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the request for review filed by Hemet Unified School District, Hemet, California, on July 23, 2008 IS GRANTED and REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1-4 and
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2260A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2260A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2260A1.txt
    • complaint resolution provisions in Section 76.1713. Therefore, we grant RCN relief from Section 76.601 of the Commission's rules as it pertains to Sections 76.605(a)(1) through Section 76.605(a)(11) for the systems at issue until such time when the Commission may revise the rules to adequately address systems utilizing all-digital transmission. Ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 0.61, 0.283, 1.3, and 76.605(b) of the Commission's Rules; 47 C.F.R. �� 0.61, 0.283, 1.3, & 76.605(b); the petition of RCN Corporation for relief from Section 76.601 as it pertains to Sections 76.605(a)(1) through Section 76.605(a)(11) of the Commission's Rules; 47 C.F.R. �� 76.601 & 76.605(a)(1)-(11); IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William T. Lake Chief, Media Bureau Appendix List of Communities and Legal
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2302A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2302A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2302A1.txt
    • a pecuniary interest, including communications on behalf of an employer. You therefore request a waiver of this rule to permit the following amateur licensees, who are employees of the Commonwealth, to transmit communications on behalf of their employer in connection with the exercise: Robert Stephens, WA4CMO; Patrick Compton, KF4FMZ; Glenn Foley, KO4OL; Paul Green, KI4JWM; and Charles O'Neal, KE4AIE. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the October 28 public safety exercise by permitting the specified amateur licensees to participate warrants this limited waiver
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2302A1_Rcd.pdf
    • have a pecuniary interest, including communications on behalf of an employer. You therefore request a waiver of this rule to permit the following amateur licensees, who are employees of the Commonwealth, to transmit communications on behalf of their employer in connection with the exercise:Robert Stephens, WA4CMO; Patrick Compton, KF4FMZ; Glenn Foley, KO4OL; Paul Green, KI4JWM; and Charles O'Neal, KE4AIE. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the October 28 public safety exercise by permitting the specified amateur licensees to participate warrants this limited waiver
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2332A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2332A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2332A1.txt
    • amateur licensees from transmitting communications in which they have a pecuniary interest, including communications on behalf of an employer. You therefore request a waiver of this rule to permit the following amateur licensees, who are employees of the County, to transmit communications on behalf of their employer in connection with the exercise: Gary Daigle, KB1GBD, and Maurice Rothrock, AB1KI. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the October 29-30 public safety exercise by permitting the specified amateur licensees to participate warrants this limited waiver
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2332A1_Rcd.pdf
    • amateur licensees from transmitting communications in which they have a pecuniary interest, including communications on behalf of an employer. You therefore request a waiver of this rule to permit the following amateur licensees, who are employees of the County, to transmit communications on behalf of their employer in connection with the exercise: Gary Daigle, KB1GBD, and Maurice Rothrock, AB1KI. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the October 29-30 public safety exercise by permitting the specified amateur licensees to participate warrants this limited waiver
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2359A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2359A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2359A1.txt
    • was resolved properly under our rule or an appropriate waiver of the Red Light Rule had been granted. 47 C.F.R. � 1.955(a)(3). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.901. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. �� 22.317 (90 days), 90.157(a) (one year). See Assignment Application, Amendment filed Oct. 20, 2009. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.955(a)(3). 47 C.F.R. � 1.925. Alternatively, pursuant to section 1.3, the Commission has authority to waive its rules if there is ``good cause'' to do so. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990). Id. at 3. Id. Id. Id. Id. See supra para. 2. The Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996 (DCIA), Public Law 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321, 1358
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2359A1_Rcd.pdf
    • Settlement, does not evidence any intent on Northstar's part to warehouse spectrum. 10. Moreover, grant of a waiver of section 1.955(a)(3) will serve the public interest in anticipation that the spectrum will be timely put to use to provide spectrum to the public. In light of the 26See 47 C.F.R. � 1.955(a)(3). 2747 C.F.R. � 1.925. Alternatively, pursuant to section 1.3, the Commission has authority to waive its rules if there is "good cause" to do so. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See alsoNortheast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990). 28Id.at 3. 29Id. 30Id. 31Id. 32Id. 33See suprapara. 2. 13479 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2359 facts before us, we determine six months is a reasonable period of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2360A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2360A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2360A1.txt
    • (MB 2006) (``Clear Channel'') (waiving Section 73.3598(e) of the Rules and accepting WKRH(FM)'s license application based, in part, on the fact that the facility was fully constructed by the permit's expiration date) , recon. denied, Letter, 23 FCC Rcd 4526 (MB 2008). 47 C.F.R. � 1.106(a)(1). Petition at 1. 47 C.F.R. � 73.3598(e). 47 C.F.R. �� 0.201, 0.283 and � 1.3. See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1156-57 (DC Cir. 1969) (``WAIT'') (Commission may waive any provision of its rules if it determines that good cause has been shown and that grant of the waiver does not undermine the policies set forth by the rule). Id. at 1156-57. See WRKH(FM), Mobile, Alabama, Letter, 23 FCC Rcd 4526, 4529-30,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2377A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2377A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2377A1.txt
    • Wyandotte County, Kansas, Emergency Management Cleburne Webb KC0VVT Wyandotte County, Kansas, Emergency Management Matt May KC4WCG Johnson County, Kansas, Emergency Management Michael O'Neal KC0YSO Platte County, Missouri, Sherriff's Office Phillip Campbell KC0ZNI Miami County, Kansas, Sherriff's Office Stan Swaggart KC0ZLC Cass County, Missouri, Emergency Management Frank Goetzfridt KB0HMR Independence, Missouri, Fire Department Mark Widner KC0UMZ Independence, Missouri, Fire Department Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the November 7 public safety exercise by permitting the specified amateur licensees to participate warrants this limited waiver
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2377A1_Rcd.pdf
    • Kansas, Emergency Management Cleburne Webb KC0VVT Wyandotte County, Kansas, Emergency Management Matt May KC4WCG Johnson County, Kansas, Emergency Management Michael O'Neal KC0YSO Platte County, Missouri, Sherriff's Office Phillip Campbell KC0ZNI Miami County, Kansas, Sherriff's Office StanSwaggart KC0ZLC Cass County, Missouri, Emergency Management Frank Goetzfridt KB0HMR Independence, Missouri, Fire Department Mark Widner KC0UMZ Independence, Missouri, Fire Department 13570 Matt May Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides thatthe Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the November 7 public safety exercise by permitting the specified amateur licensees to participate warrants this limited waiver of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2386A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2386A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2386A1.txt
    • comments were due in which to file its reply. Therefore, we establish a new deadline for replies to be filed eleven days from the release date of this order: November 16, 2009. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to 4(i), 4(j) and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j) and 155(c), and Sections 1.3, 76.7 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, and 76.7, the requirement that parties be served hard copies of the comments, reply comments, and ex parte letters in this proceeding IS WAIVED. This action is taken pursuant to authority delegated by Section 0.283 of the Commission's rules. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William T. Lake Chief, Media Bureau Media Bureau Seeks
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2389A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2389A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2389A1.txt
    • Internet-based TRS providers for several months, we find that neither Hamilton nor Purple has demonstrated good cause to waive this requirement. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 151, 225, and 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 225, and 251(e), and sections 0.91, 0.141, 0.291, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.141, 0.291, 0.361, 1.3, that this Order is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Declaratory Ruling or Limited Waiver of the Commission's Rules filed by Sorenson Communications, Inc. on April 13, 2009, is granted to the extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Temporary Limited
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2399A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2399A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2399A1.txt
    • Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 09-2399 Released: November 9, 2009 MEDIA BUREAU ACTION MEDIA BUREAU SEEKS COMMENT ON INTEL'S REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF THE IEEE-1394 OUTPUT REQUIREMENT CS Docket No. 97-80 / CSR-8229-Z Comment Date: November 30, 2009 Reply Comment Date: December 10, 2009 Intel Corporation (``Intel'') has filed a request pursuant to Sections 629(a) and 629(c) of the Communications Act and 1.3, 76.7, and 76.1207 of the Commission's rules for waiver of part of Section 76.640(b)(4)(ii) of the Commission's rules. Section 76.640(b)(4)(ii) requires cable operators to include a DVI or HDMI interface and an IEEE 1394 interface on all high definition set-top boxes (``STBs'') that they acquire for distribution to customers. Intel seeks waiver of this rule section with respect to the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2420A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2420A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2420A1.txt
    • to permit the following County employees to transmit communications on behalf of their employer in connection with the exercise: Frederick A. Zacher, KC9FYP; Marvin Murphy, KA9KEI; Eddie C. Lane, K9ISZ; Wayne Clymer, N9RYT; Calvin K. Lunny, N9IUA; Louis J. Rempe, K9LJR; Karen Murphy, N9RYP; John Reid, KC9GAW; Jerome Gawthorp, KC9J; Stephen J. Lighthall, KC9EUP; and David A. Short, N9ZLZ. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the November 18 public safety exercise by permitting the specified amateur licensees to participate warrants this limited waiver
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2420A1_Rcd.pdf
    • to permit the following County employees to transmit communications on behalf of their employer in connection with the exercise: Frederick A. Zacher, KC9FYP; Marvin Murphy, KA9KEI; Eddie C. Lane, K9ISZ; Wayne Clymer, N9RYT; Calvin K. Lunny, N9IUA; Louis J. Rempe, K9LJR; Karen Murphy, N9RYP; John Reid, KC9GAW; Jerome Gawthorp, KC9J; Stephen J. Lighthall, KC9EUP; and David A. Short, N9ZLZ. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the November 18 public safety exercise by permitting the specified amateur licensees to participate warrants this limited waiver
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2425A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2425A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2425A1.txt
    • people. Finally, you argue that because EnteroMedics' waiver request is consistent with the purpose of Section 15.209 in controlling interference from unlicensed radio communications to other users and would further the public interest by providing a badly needed life-saving therapy, it would fit easily within the boundaries established by WAIT Radio. We are authorized to grant a waiver under Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules if the petitioner demonstrates good cause for such action. Good cause, in turn, may be found and a waiver granted ``where particular facts would make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest.'' To make this public interest determination, the waiver cannot undermine the purposes of the rule, and there must be a stronger public interest benefit
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2432A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2432A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2432A1.txt
    • KG6IRA; Jerri DeLatorre, KI6CIG; Jora Dodell, KF6JLF; Cheryl Cook, W6SZF; Peter Lyons, KG6BOB; Mary Ann Garland, KF6JLG; Matt Covella, KF6EXO; and Pearl Iizuka, KI6MCI. You also request a similar waiver for the following employees of the Chadwick School, a private school that participates in the District's disaster preparedness planning: Miguel Lopez, KF6JLB; Bob Rule, KF6JUJ; and Dave Nathanson, KG6ZJO. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the December 1, January 5, February 2, March 2, May 4, and June 1 public safety exercises by
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2432A1_Rcd.pdf
    • Riegle, KG6IRA; Jerri DeLatorre, KI6CIG; Jora Dodell, KF6JLF; Cheryl Cook, W6SZF; Peter Lyons, KG6BOB; Mary Ann Garland, KF6JLG; Matt Covella, KF6EXO; and Pearl Iizuka, KI6MCI. You also request a similar waiver for the following employees of the Chadwick School, a private school that participates in the District's disasterpreparedness planning: Miguel Lopez, KF6JLB; Bob Rule, KF6JUJ; and Dave Nathanson, KG6ZJO. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the December 1, January 5, February 2, March 2, May 4, and June 1 public safety exercises by
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2477A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2477A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2477A1.txt
    • it is appropriate to grant the requested waiver. This Order therefore grants Primatronix's waiver request. Primatronix may therefore proceed with either TCB certification or Self-Declaration of Conformity pursuant to Part 68 of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.141 and 0.361 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the request for waiver of section 68.317(f) for Model MemoryPlus319iph, filed by Primatronix LTD, IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: (1) the volume reset override switch shall be labeled as such and located on the telephone in such a way as to not be accessible to accidental engagement; (2) a bright
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2506A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2506A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2506A1.txt
    • of any of the video transmitters, and that the devices are imported from import/export companies in China and Hong Kong. You indicate that you imported the specified devices between December 19, 2007 and June 8, 2008, and imported a total of 124 units. Additionally, you indicate that the frequency bands on which the 1.2 GHz transmitters operate are 0.9 GHz/1.2 GHz/1.3 GHz and that the frequency bands on which the 2.4 GHz transmitters operate are 2.2 GHz/2.3 GHz/2.4 GHz. Your response also states that ``[you] have immediately ceased all sales of the products in question. The website has been dismantled and the domain name will be relinquished.'' You admit that the devices have not been certified in accordance with the Rules,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2509A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2509A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2509A1.txt
    • request a waiver of this rule to permit the following amateur licensees who are employees of Draper City to transmit communications on behalf of their employer in connection with these exercises: Tylyn Carlson, KE7OJE; Gary Martinsen, KE7OJF; Steve Siddoway, KE7OJG; Rick North, KE7OJH; Ron Jackson, KE7OJI; Eric Braegger, KE7OJJ; Brad Williams, KE7OJK; Brian Markland, KE7SOV; and Lori Edwards, KE7QAS. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the December 2, January 6, February 3, March 3, April 7, May 5, and June 2 public safety
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2509A1_Rcd.pdf
    • request a waiver of this rule to permit the following amateur licensees who are employees of Draper City to transmit communications on behalf of their employer in connection with these exercises: Tylyn Carlson, KE7OJE; Gary Martinsen, KE7OJF; Steve Siddoway, KE7OJG; Rick North, KE7OJH; Ron Jackson, KE7OJI; Eric Braegger, KE7OJJ; Brad Williams, KE7OJK; Brian Markland, KE7SOV; and Lori Edwards, KE7QAS. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the December 2, January 6, February 3, March 3, April 7, May 5, and June 2 public safety
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2510A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2510A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2510A1.txt
    • Hospital Doug Olinger KD0FNP Renville County Hospital Dan Anderson KD0ASX Nobles County Emergency Manager Don Williams KD0BJX Jackson County Public Health Lyle Loge KC0WBT Affiliated Community Medical Centers (ACMC) Marshall Market St. L. VanDenEinde KC0WBJ ACMC Marshall Bruce St. Stacy O'Brien KC0WBN ACMC Redwood Falls James Reinert KD0IGA Murray County Emergency Manager Randy Donahue WB0ZSO Murray County Law Enforcement Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the December 2, January 6, February 3, March 3, April 7, May 5, and June 2 public safety
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2510A1_Rcd.pdf
    • KD0FNP Renville County Hospital Dan Anderson KD0ASX Nobles County Emergency Manager Don Williams KD0BJX Jackson County Public Health Lyle Loge KC0WBT Affiliated Community Medical Centers (ACMC) Marshall Market St. L. VanDenEinde KC0WBJ ACMC Marshall Bruce St. Stacy O'Brien KC0WBN ACMC Redwood Falls James Reinert KD0IGA Murray County Emergency Manager Randy Donahue WB0ZSO Murray County Law Enforcement 14252 Arl Weinrebe Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the December 2, January 6, February 3, March 3, April 7, May 5, and June 2 public safety
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2511A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2511A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2511A1.txt
    • communications in which they have a pecuniary interest, including communications on behalf of an employer. You therefore request a waiver of this rule to permit the Peter Lamb, N1NVE, who is a Town employee, to transmit communications on behalf of the Town in connection with the exercise. He will communicate with other (volunteer) amateur licensees to coordinate the exercise. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the December 12 (or 19) public safety exercise by permitting the specified amateur licensees to participate warrants this
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2511A1_Rcd.pdf
    • communications in which they have a pecuniary interest, including communications on behalf of an employer. You therefore request a waiver of this rule to permit the Peter Lamb, N1NVE, who is a Town employee, to transmit communications on behalf of the Town in connection with the exercise. He will communicate with other (volunteer) amateur licensees to coordinate the exercise. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the December 12(or 19) public safety exercise by permitting the specified amateur licensees to participate warrants this limited
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2512A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2512A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2512A1.txt
    • from transmitting communications in which they have a pecuniary interest, including communications on behalf of an employer. You therefore request a waiver of this rule to permit the following amateur licensees, who are CCFD captains, to transmit communications on behalf of their employer in connection with the exercise: Darryl Wells, KI6GUU; William T. Heins, KI6UHA; and Tom Murphy, KF6FMF. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the December 7 public safety exercise by permitting the specified amateur licensees to participate warrants this limited waiver
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2512A1_Rcd.pdf
    • from transmitting communications in which they have a pecuniary interest, including communications on behalf of an employer. You therefore request a waiver of this rule to permit the following amateur licensees, who are CCFD captains, to transmit communications on behalf of their employer in connection with the exercise: Darryl Wells, KI6GUU; William T. Heins, KI6UHA; and Tom Murphy, KF6FMF. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the December 7 public safety exercise by permitting the specified amateur licensees to participate warrants this limited waiver
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2513A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2513A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2513A1.txt
    • this rule to permit the following amateur licensees, who are employees of DOH or CRHS, to transmit communications on behalf of their employer in connection with the exercise: David Bagge, KD0CCP; Mike Schweiss, KD0CCI; Charity Hunter, KD0CCM; William Brantley, KD0CMO; Nancie McAnaugh, KD0DDY; Bryan Norman, KD0GRU; Brian Tordoff, KD0GRS; Jon Johnson, KD0ITI; Mike Bock, KD0ITA; and Michael Whitney, KD0ITO. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the January 15 public safety exercise by permitting the specified amateur licensees to participate warrants this limited waiver
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2513A1_Rcd.pdf
    • this rule to permit the following amateur licensees, who are employees of DOH or CRHS, to transmit communications on behalf of their employer in connection with the exercise: David Bagge, KD0CCP; Mike Schweiss, KD0CCI; Charity Hunter, KD0CCM; William Brantley, KD0CMO; Nancie McAnaugh, KD0DDY; Bryan Norman, KD0GRU; Brian Tordoff, KD0GRS; Jon Johnson, KD0ITI; Mike Bock, KD0ITA; and Michael Whitney, KD0ITO. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of thewaiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the January 15 public safety exercise by permitting the specified amateur licensees to participate warrants this limited waiver of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2543A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2543A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2543A1.txt
    • sought by the TDI Coalition in its Petition for Emergency Stay, that petition is dismissed as moot. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 225, 251(e), and 255 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 154(j), 225, 251(e), and 255, and sections 0.91, 0.141, 0.291, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.141, 0.291, 0.361, 1.3, that this Order is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Emergency Stay, filed by the TDI Coalition on October 27, 2009, is dismissed as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Request to Return to the Status Quo Ante, filed by the TDI Coalition on
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2588A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2588A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2588A1.txt
    • 47 C.F.R. � 54.706. See Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Sixteenth Order on Reconsideration, CC Docket No. 96-45, Eighth Report and Order, CC Docket No. 96-45, Sixth Report and Order, Docket No. 96-262, 15 FCC Rcd 1679, 1687-1692, paras. 17-29 (1999) (Fifth Circuit Remand Order). Generally, the Commission's rules may be waived for good cause shown. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). In addition, the Commission may take into account considerations of hardship, equity, or more effective implementation of overall policy on an individual basis.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2602A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2602A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2602A1.txt
    • limited coverage areas when compared to other stations in their respective markets, a finding on which previous satellite exemptions had been based. Further, to make the switch from satellite to full-service operations, ION would need to invest additional capital to construct master control rooms as well as purchase production and other equipment. The BIA Report estimates those costs to be 1.3 million dollars per station. We agree with Media Holdco that, given the economic climate and ION's exit from bankruptcy, obtaining financing for capital investments would be difficult. Media Holdco has, thus, submitted evidence demonstrating the unfeasibility of finding a purchaser willing to operate the stations on a stand-alone basis. We, therefore, find that continued operation of station WDPX-TV and WPXG-TV
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2634A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2634A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2634A1.txt
    • type of CPE. We extend this waiver until July 1, 2010, or until the Commission addresses pending petitions regarding CPE portability, whichever comes first. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 151, 225, and 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 225, and 251(e), and sections 0.91, 0.141, 0.291, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.141, 0.291, 0.361, and 1.3, this ORDER IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for VRS, the waivers of the one-line VCO, VCO-to-TTY, and VCO-to-VCO; one-line HCO, HCO-to-TTY, and HCO-to-HCO; call release; pay-per-call (900) calls, types of calls, and equal access to interexchange carrier requirements are hereby extended for six months until
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-38A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-38A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-38A1.txt
    • of harmful interference with PCS and/or AWS communications, and that waiving so many technical rules in an adjudicatory decision would improperly circumvent the Administrative Procedure Act's notice-and-comment requirements. We are not persuaded by Sprint Nextel's procedural argument that ICO's requests for technical waivers are too radical and/or too numerous to be considered on the merits in an adjudicatory decision. Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules states that the Commission may waive its rules for ``good cause shown,'' and it is well-established that waiver of a Commission rule is appropriate when granting such relief would not undermine the rule's policy objective and would better serve the public interest than requiring strict compliance. We will evaluate each of ICO's technical waiver requests in
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-428A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-428A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-428A1.txt
    • bands is being provided on a non-interference basis to other services authorized in these bands, that the service may be degraded as the result of interference from other authorized services, and that service will be terminated if Northrop Grumman Space & Mission Systems Corporation's operations cause harmful interference to any authorized service. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, Northrop Grumman Space & Mission Systems Corporation IS GRANTED a waiver of Sections 25.143(b)(2)(ii) and (iii), 25.145(c)(1) and (2), and 25.217(b)(1) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R �� 25.143(b)(2)(ii) and (iii); 25.145(c)(1) and (2); and 25.217(b)(1), for purposes of using the four GSO satellites authorized in this Order to meet the geographic
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-430A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-430A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-430A1.txt
    • this data collection. We note that filers may begin filing their data as soon as February 23, 2009 and, accordingly, this new deadline will give filers almost three weeks to file their data. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91 and 0.291, the March 1, 2009 FCC Form 477 filing deadline is EXTENDED to March 16, 2009. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that sections 1.7002 and 43.01(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.7002,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-442A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-442A1.txt
    • in Table C5 may operate according to the band plan for Canadian Border Regions 7A and 7B as indicated below. TABLE C5 - CITIES THAT ARE CONSIDERED TO FALL WITHIN CANDIAN BORDER REGION 7 Location Coordinates Canadian Border Region Latitude Longitude Akron, Ohio 41( 05' 00.2" N. 81( 30' 39.4" W. 7A Youngstown, Ohio 41( 05' 57.2" N. 80( 39' 01.3" W. 7A Syracuse, New York 43( 03' 04.2" N. 76( 09' 12.7" W. 7B * * * * (7) * * * TABLE C7 - GENERAL CATEGORY 806-821/851-866 MHz Band CHANNELS IN THE CANADA BORDER REGIONS. Canada Border Region General Category channels where 800 MHz high density cellular systems are prohibited. General Category channels where 800 MHz high density cellular
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-469A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-469A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-469A1.txt
    • Bureau's conclusions in the July 2008 Financial Hardship Order were based on erroneous factual assumptions. The Bureau also understands that Petitioner's financial condition has weakened in the months since the release of the July 2008 Financial Hardship Order. In light of the further deterioration of Petitioner's financial condition, we conclude that a limited extension of waiver is justified under Sections 1.3, 1.106, and 76.7 of the Commission's rules. James Cable argues that the Bureau's decisions (1) failed to take into account the harmful effects of the waiver ending within weeks of the transition to digital broadcast television, (2) failed to take into account that the continued waiver will provide compelling public interest benefits, and (3) were based on a material error
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-470A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-470A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-470A1.txt
    • Bureau's conclusions in the November 2008 Financial Hardship Order were based on erroneous factual assumptions. The Bureau also understands that Petitioner's financial condition has weakened in the months since the release of the November 2008 Financial Hardship Order. In light of the further deterioration of Petitioner's financial condition, we conclude that a limited extension of waiver is justified under Sections 1.3, 1.106, and 76.7 of the Commission's rules. Broadstripe argues that the Bureau's decisions (1) failed to take into account the harmful effects of the waiver ending within weeks of the transition to digital broadcast television, (2) failed to take into account that the continued waiver will provide compelling public interest benefits, and (3) were based on a material error of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-526A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-526A1.txt
    • that they ``have adequate access to communications services.'' In addition, we note that Seminole has made it clear that its proposed station would be focused on programming of interest to the Seminole people. Conclusion/Action. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that the Petition for Reconsideration filed by the Seminole Tribe of Florida, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the request for waiver of Section 73.515 of the Rules, filed by Seminole Tribe of Florida, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that Seminole Tribe of Florida's application for a new NCE-FM station at Big Cypress, Florida, (File No. BNPED-20071019AUM) IS REINSTATED AND ACCEPTED FOR FILING. Petitions to deny are due within thirty
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-535A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-535A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-535A1.txt
    • deploy EAS ``until 1Q09.'' In that same Amended Petition, NTELOS asserts that it ``continues to educate each customer wishing to sign up for our IPTV service about the EAS situation and we explain that EAS is only available currently on the broadcast channels in our lineup.'' Based on our review of the NTELOS petitions, we find that, consistent with Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules and WAIT Radio, NTELOS has demonstrated unique factual circumstances, i.e., that technical limitations of its IPTV system architecture prevented NTELOS from complying with the Commission's EAS compliance deadline, and, it had no reasonable alternative by which to provide EAS on all of the channels it carries prior to its proposed implementation date. However, NTELOS fails to
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.txt
    • Community, January 1, 2008 2007 January 1, 2008 More than 750 MHz 750 MHz 331 - 749 MHz 330 or Less MHz Mean N Mean S.E. Mean S.E. Mean S.E. Mean S.E. Mean S.E. Sample groups overall 748 667 759 3.8 30.5% 2.1 59.1% 2.2 9.7% 1.1 0.7% 0.2 Noncompetitive Communities 744 385 757 4.4 29.4% 2.4 59.1% 2.5 10.6% 1.3 0.9% 0.3 Communities relieved from rate regulation 766 282 772 6.5 35.8% 3.8 59.0% 3.9 5.2% 1.7 0.1% 0.1 2nd cable operator subgroup (overall) 766 103 774 6.6 32.9% 5.1 61.9% 5.4 5.2% 2.5 0.0% 0.0 2nd cable operator subgroup (incumbents) 755 55 765 7.6 29.1% 6.2 65.5% 6.5 5.5% 3.1 0.0% 0.0 2nd cable operator subgroup (rivals) 811 48
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-54A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-54A1.txt
    • 29.7 53.9 73.0 35.4 Played downloaded game 9.0 8.3 4.4 7.3 9.0 11.4 10.3 Accessed downloaded application 4.9 2.9 1.8 2.6 4.1 2.5 3.4 Sent/received photos or videos 23.0 27.6 25.0 20.9 32.0 31.0 30.2 Purchased ringtones 9.2 3.8 4.1 3.6 4.0 4.1 3.2 Used e-mail 12.6 8.6 6.5 7.2 11.2 9.1 9.1 Accessed social networking sites 4.8 2.8 2.4 1.3 2.7 2.5 4.9 Source M:Metrics. VII. INTERMODAL ISSUES A. Wireless � Wireline Competition 228. Once solely a business tool, wireless phones are now a mass-market consumer device.647 As one journalist reported in early 2008: There is now one cellphone for every two humans on earth. From essentially zero, we've passed a watershed of more than 3.3 billion active cellphones on
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-67A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-67A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-67A1.txt
    • sources other than their MVPD. Although the cable industry has challenged the lawfulness of the integration ban on three separate occasions, in each of those cases the D.C. Circuit denied those petitions. In limited circumstances, however, operators may be eligible for waiver of the integration ban. The Waiver Request On November 26, 2008, Cablevision filed a request pursuant to Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's rules, for a limited 18-month extension of its waiver of the prohibition on integrated set-top boxes set forth in Section 76.1204(a)(1) of the Commission's rules. Cablevision's current limited waiver is set to expire on July 1, 2009. Securing an 18-month extension of the waiver of the integration ban would allow Cablevision to use its Smartcard
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-681A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-681A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-681A1.txt
    • have filed separate requests for waiver of the Commission's rules requiring DTV consumer education because of Hawaii's early transition to digital television, which occurred on January 15, 2009, and their considerable efforts to educate Hawaii residents about the state's early transition to digital television. For the reasons set forth below, we grant TWC's and HTI's requested waivers, pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, and dismiss as moot all of the Stations' waiver requests. discussion The DTV Consumer Education Initiative In 2008, the Commission adopted consumer education requirements that television broadcasters, MVPDs, telecommunications carriers, and manufacturers must comply with to educate consumers and viewers about the digital television transition and facilitate a smooth transition. Congress recently extended the DTV transition
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-683A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-683A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-683A1.txt
    • pursuant to sections 1, 4 (i) and (j), 201-209, of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i) and (j), 201-209, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91 and 0.291, this order is HEREBY ADOPTED as described above. 14. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commissions rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91 and 0.291, section 61.49(k) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 61.49(k), IS WAIVED for the purpose specified in paragraph 4 supra. 15. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.3 of the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-686A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-686A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-686A1.txt
    • that the requested waiver be granted. This Order therefore grants Fanstel's waiver request. As a result, Fanstel may proceed with either TCB certification or Self-Declaration of Conformity pursuant to Part 68 of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.141 and 0.361 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the request for waiver of section 68.317(f) for Models Fanstel T56 and Fanstel T44, filed by Fanstel Corporation, Taipei, IS GRANTED to the extent stated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: (1) the volume reset override switch shall be labeled as
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-694A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-694A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-694A1.txt
    • and Homeland Security Bureau. - FCC - EAS Participants include television and radio broadcasters. 47 C.F.R. � 11.2(c). 47 C.F.R. Part 11. Id. at � 11.31(c). See 47 C.F.R. � 11.61(a)(1) and (2). 47 C.F.R. � 11.61(a)(4). We note that the Commission's rules also prohibit transmission of false or deceptive EAS messages. See 47 C.F.R. � 11.45. 47 C.F.R � 1.3. See Northeast Cellular Telephone Co., L.P. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). See WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969), aff'd, 459 F.2d 1203 (D.C. Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972) (WAIT Radio) Id. (citing Rio Grande Family Radio Fellowship, Inc. v. FCC, 406 F.2d 664 (D.C. Cir. 1968)); Birach Broadcasting
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-743A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-743A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-743A1.txt
    • an interim basis, while we review whether this information collection is still necessary, will reduce the paperwork burden on filers without harming the public interest. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that section 43.21(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 43.21(b), IS WAIVED to the extent indicated herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Julie A. Veach Deputy Chief Wireline Competition Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 43.21(b). The Commission requested discontinuance of OMB approval of the information collection under OMB Control Number 3060-0514
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-749A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-749A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-749A1.txt
    • For further information, please contact Dana Wilson, Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau, Disability Rights Office, at (202) 418-2247 (voice), (202) 418-7898 (TTY), or e-mail at Dana.Wilson@fcc.gov. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 2, and 225 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 152, and 225, and sections 0.141, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.316 & 1.3, this Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the traditional TRS Providers ARE GRANTED an extension of time, until June 29, 2009, to implement a system, as set forth in section 64.604(a)(4) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 64.604(a)(4), to automatically and immediately call an appropriate PSAP
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-763A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-763A2.txt
    • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 1 ATTACHMENT 1 to FCC Public Notice DA 09-763 Recommendations on draft preliminary views by the Advisory Committee for the 2011 World Radiocommunication Conference 2 Maritime Aeronautical and Radar Services 3 Document WAC/013(31.03.09) WAC Informal Working Group (IWG)-1 Modifications to NTIA's Preliminary View on Agenda Item 1.3 (see WAC/006(13.01.09)) Preparation for ITU Radiocommunication Conferences UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PRELIMINARY VIEWS ON WRC-11 AGENDA ITEM 1.3: To consider spectrum requirements and possible regulatory actions, including allocations, in order to support the safe operation of unmanned aircraft systems (UAS), based on the results of ITU-R studies, in accordance with Resolution 421 (WRC-07) ISSUE: The purpose of this agenda item
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-763A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-763A3.txt
    • Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), on behalf of the Executive Branch agencies, approved the release of a package of draft Executive Branch preliminary views for 2011 World Radiocommunication Conference (WRC-11). These draft preliminary views consider the Federal agency inputs toward the development of U.S. proposals for WRC-11. The enclosure contains preliminary views for the following agenda items: j) Agenda Item 1.3 - Unmanned Aircraft Systems; k) Agenda Item 1.4 - Aeronautical Mobile (R) Service at VHF/UHF/SHF; and l) Agenda Item 1.21 - Radiolocation Service at 15.4-15.7 GHz. This package is forwarded for your consideration and review by your WRC-11 Advisory Committee. Darlene Drazenovich of my staff is the primary contact for NTIA. Sincerely, Original Signed August 28, 2008 Karl B. Nebbia
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-788A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-788A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-788A1.txt
    • and Order, Fifth Report and Order, Fourth Memorandum Opinion and Order, and Order, WT Docket No. 02-55, et al., 19 FCC Rcd 14969 (2004) (Rebanding Report and Order). Rebanding Report and Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 15079 � 205 (footnote omitted). Rebanding Report and Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 15079 � 206 (citing 47 C.F.R. � 1.925). Pursuant to Section 1.3, the Commission may waive its rules if there is ``good cause'' to do so and if certain other criteria are satisfied. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990). In the context of 800 MHz Rebanding, the Commission defines ``good cause basis'' as a showing that the licensee would have
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-806A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-806A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-806A1.txt
    • bills, many of its Lifeline customers may discard the mailings without opening or reading them. TracFone asserts that its alternative notification proposal will reach consumers more effectively than mailing notifications because its Lifeline customers will view the messages directly on their wireless handsets and will likely read the contents of the text messages before deleting them. discussion Pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, the Commission may waive any provision of its rules if it determines that good cause has been shown. We conclude that good cause exists to grant TracFone a conditional waiver of the DTV notification requirements in section 54.418 of the Commission's rules. TracFone has demonstrated that good cause exists to grant TracFone a waiver of the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-825A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-825A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-825A1.txt
    • not demonstrated that special circumstances warrant deviation from the general rule. Consistent with the Commission's Aberdeen School District Order, we therefore deny these petitioners' appeals. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that waivers of sections 54.504(b) and (c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 54.504(b) and (c), ARE GRANTED to the petitioners listed in Appendices A and B and their applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration consistent with this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-854A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-854A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-854A1.txt
    • 254(g) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 201-203, and 254(g), and pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, that the Alaska Communications Systems Group, Inc., petition for waiver IS GRANTED to the extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, that section 69.3(i)(1) of the Commission's rules IS WAIVED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.102(b)(1), and pursuant
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-855A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-855A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-855A1.txt
    • 4(i), 201-203, and 254(g) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 201-203, and 254(g), and pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, that the CenturyTel, Inc., petition for waiver IS GRANTED to the extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, that section 69.3(i)(1) of the Commission's rules IS WAIVED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.102(b)(1), and pursuant
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-883A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-883A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-883A1.txt
    • the petitioners have enacted in response to these late filings, we do not expect these petitioners to seek similar waivers in the future. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that this order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that USAC SHALL ACCEPT the line count data submitted by Grande Communications Networks, Inc. as timely filed by the September 30, 2007 deadline. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver of sections 54.307(c)(2) and 54.802(a) of the Commission's
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-884A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-884A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-884A1.txt
    • found at http://www.usac.org/hc/tools/filing-tool/default.aspx. We encourage filers to use any and all methods they deem necessary to ensure that their filings are timely received. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that this order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver of section 54.802(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.802(a), filed by LBH, L.L.C, IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver of sections 54.307(c) and 54.802(a) of the Commission's rules,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-885A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-885A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-885A1.txt
    • the procedures Xfone has enacted in response to these late filings, we do not expect Xfone to seek similar waivers in the future. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that this order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver of sections 54.307(c) and 54.802(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 54.307(c) and 54.802(a), filed by Xfone USA, Inc., IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as discussed herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-886A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-886A1.txt
    • be found at http://www.usac.org/hc/tools/filing-tool/default.aspx. We encourage filers to use any and all methods they deem necessary to ensure their filings are timely received. ordering clauseS Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.301(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.301(b), filed by ICORE, Inc. on behalf of Northeast Iowa Telephone Company IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.102(b)(1), this order SHALL
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-887A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-887A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-887A1.txt
    • found at http://www.usac.org/hc/tools/filing-tool/default.aspx. We encourage filers to use any and all methods they deem necessary to ensure that their filings are timely received. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that this order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver of sections 54.307(d) and 54.314(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 54.307(d), 54.314(d), filed by Centennial USVI Operations Corp., IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that USAC SHALL PROVIDE high-cost universal service support to
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-896A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-896A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-896A1.txt
    • 1.939 and 1.2108 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.939, 1.2108, the Petition to Deny application File No. 0003098334 filed by Warren C. Havens, AMTS Consortium LLC, and Telesaurus-VPC LLC on August 10, 2007, IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, the Request for Leave to File Unauthorized Response filed by Cornerstone SMR, Inc. on August 31, 2007, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Cornerstone SMR, Inc. SHALL AMEND application FCC File No. 0003098334 within thirty days of the release date of this Order to reflect the additional gross
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-896A1_Rcd.pdf
    • 1.939 and 1.2108 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.939, 1.2108, the Petition to Deny application File No. 0003098334 filed by Warren C. Havens, AMTS Consortium LLC, and Telesaurus-VPC LLC on August 10, 2007, IS DENIED. 18. ITIS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, the Request for Leave to File Unauthorized Response filed by Cornerstone SMR, Inc. on August31, 2007, IS GRANTED. 19. ITIS FURTHER ORDERED that Cornerstone SMR, Inc. SHALL AMEND application FCC File No. 0003098334 within thirty days of the release date of this Orderto reflect the additional gross revenues discussed
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-902A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-902A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-902A1.txt
    • Verizon's provision of customer notification and certification to the Commission that complies with all requirements of section 64.1120(e), except the 30-day periods waived herein. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.141, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Verizon New York, Inc., on April 13, 2009, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Erica H. McMahon, Chief Consumer Policy Division Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau See 2000 Biennial Review-Review
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-906A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-906A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-906A1.txt
    • permit it to continue to provide valuable services, including real-time messaging and location and logistics tracking capabilities. Comtech seeks a waiver of the Commission rules concerning minimum capabilities of L-Band MSS, specifically capabilities that provide for priority access and real-time preemption consistent with Footnotes US308 and US315 to the Table of Allocations and Section 25.136(d) of the Commission's rules. Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules authorizes the Commission to waive its rules for ``good cause shown.'' Waiver is appropriate only if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule and such deviation would better serve the public interest than would strict adherence to the general rule. Generally, the Commission may grant a waiver of its rules in a particular case
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-906A1_Rcd.pdf
    • will permit it to continue to provide valuable services, including real-time messaging and location and logistics tracking capabilities. 4.Comtech seeks a waiver of the Commission rules concerning minimum capabilities of L- Band MSS, specifically capabilities that provide for priority access and real-time preemption consistent with Footnotes US308 and US315 to the Table of Allocations13and Section 25.136(d) of the Commission's rules.14Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules authorizes the Commission to waive its rules for "good cause shown."15Waiver is appropriate only if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule and such deviation would better serve the public interest than would strict adherence to the general rule.16Generally, the Commission may grant a waiver of its rules in a particular case only if
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-937A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-937A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-937A1.txt
    • petition, will serve the public interest by providing access to telecommunications services to an area that was previously without such services. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the joint petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze as codified in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Qwest Corporation, Pine Telephone Systems, Inc., and Oregon Telephone Corporation on May 4, 2006, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-992A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-992A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-992A1.txt
    • Wireless asserts that it will have completed integration of Alltel and RCC customers by December 31, 2009. We therefore grant these waivers through that date. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that Verizon Wireless's petition for waiver of section 54.711(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.711(a) IS GRANTED, to the extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. ��1.102(b), this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1003A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1003A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1003A1.txt
    • therefore request a waiver of this rule to permit the following Amateur Radio Service licensees to transmit communications on behalf of their employers in connection with this exercise: for the County, Gregory Williams, KC8WUN, Ralph Schall III, KD8BUT, Jeremy Jennings, KD8KIB, and Daniel Carpus, W2PUT; and for Detroit Edison, Michael Karmol, N8KUF, Glen Ohlemacher, K8GO, and Michael Hall, K8MLH. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the June 7 and 8, 2010 public safety exercise by permitting the specified amateur licensees to participate warrants
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1003A1_Rcd.pdf
    • therefore request a waiver of this rule to permit the following Amateur Radio Service licensees to transmit communications on behalf of their employers in connection with this exercise: for the County, Gregory Williams, KC8WUN, Ralph Schall III, KD8BUT, Jeremy Jennings, KD8KIB, and Daniel Carpus, W2PUT; and for Detroit Edison, Michael Karmol, N8KUF, Glen Ohlemacher, K8GO, and Michael Hall, K8MLH. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the June 7 and 8, 2010 public safety exercise by permitting the specified amateur licensees to participate warrants
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1004A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1004A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1004A1.txt
    • Valley Medical Center, John Johnston, KH6HO, Christopher Aplet, KI6RIS, Doug Taylor, KI6RIW, and Ronald Atteberry, KN6U; for Frank Howard Memorial Hospital, Larry Cubberly, KI6LUU; for Mendocino Coast District Hospital, Jeff Diehl, KI6PFI; for Mendocino Community Health Clinic, Belinda Smith, KI6KZY, Carolyn Ruddock, KI6RIX, Leticia Amador, KI6LAD, and Jenn Creekmore-Juenke, KI6RJG; and for Anderson Valley Health Clinic, Judy Nelson, KJ6HZX. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the June 16 public safety exercise by permitting the specified Amateur licensees to participate warrants this limited waiver
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1004A1_Rcd.pdf
    • for Ukiah Valley Medical Center, John Johnston, KH6HO, Christopher Aplet, KI6RIS, Doug Taylor, KI6RIW, and Ronald Atteberry, KN6U; for Frank Howard Memorial Hospital, Larry Cubberly, KI6LUU; forMendocino Coast District Hospital, Jeff Diehl, KI6PFI; for Mendocino Community Health Clinic, Belinda Smith, KI6KZY, Carolyn Ruddock, KI6RIX, Leticia Amador, KI6LAD, and Jenn Creekmore-Juenke, KI6RJG; and for Anderson ValleyHealth Clinic, Judy Nelson, KJ6HZX. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the June 16public safety exercise by permitting the specified Amateur licensees to participate warrants this limited waiver of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1022A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1022A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1022A1.txt
    • this application and issue an award or denial based on a complete review and analysis no later than 60 calendar days from the release of this order. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by Bradford Regional Medical Center IS GRANTED and REMANDED to USAC for further consideration. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1025A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1025A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1025A1.txt
    • a timely manner. . We encourage filers to use any and all methods they deem necessary to ensure their filings are timely received. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that this order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver of section 54.314(d)(6) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.314(d)(6), filed by CTC Telecom, Inc. IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.102(b)(1),
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1026A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1026A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1026A1.txt
    • the study area freeze rule to permit Verizon California and Verizon South to transfer the subject areas to Frontier as described. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the joint petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze as codified in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Verizon California Inc., Verizon South Inc., and Frontier Communications Corporation on January 20, 2010, IS GRANTED as set forth herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1027A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1027A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1027A1.txt
    • of the addition of one access line. We, therefore, grant Wellman's request for waiver of section 69.605(c) of the Commission's rules. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the joint petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze as codified in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc. and Wellman Cooperative Telephone Association, Incorporated on October 16, 2009, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i),
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1050A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1050A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1050A1.txt
    • USAC's receipt of the form and not the postmark date. Finally, we stress the need for USAC to impose late fees when these important filing deadlines are not met, as a means to ensure that FCC Forms 499-Q are timely filed. IV. Ordering Clauses 9. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, the requests for waiver of the FCC Form 499-Q revision deadline by ComScape Telecommunications of Raleigh-Durham, Inc. and Millennium Telecom, LLC ARE DENIED. 10. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, the request
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1051A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1051A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1051A1.txt
    • communications system authorized under call sign WQJA236. On June 19, 2008, the Bureau granted Wyoming a waiver authorizing it to use, for public safety purposes, eleven VHF frequency pairs allocated for Part 22 one-way or two-way public land mobile service. Wyoming seeks a waiver for the instant modification pursuant to Section 337(c) of the Act, or in the alternative, Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules. Station WQJA236 permits operation on eleven Part 22 public mobile service frequency pairs at twelve repeater sites (and associated mobile units) ``spread over Basic Economic Area (BEA) Nos. 143, 144, and 152.'' During the course of construction of Station WQJA236, Wyoming ``determined that it will need a limited number of additional sites to ensure
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1078A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1078A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1078A1.txt
    • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 10-1078 Released: June 15, 2010 COMMENTS SOUGHT ON CENTURYLINK PETITION FOR WAIVER OF DEADLINE to implement Number Portability Porting Interval and Validation Requirements WC Docket No. 07-244 CC Docket No. 95-116 COMMENTS DUE: June 29, 2010 REPLY COMMENTS DUE: July 6, 2010 On June 7, 2010, CenturyLink filed a petition pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules seeking a waiver of the August 2, 2010, deadline for implementation of one-business day number porting. The Commission's Porting Interval Order mandated that providers subject to local number portability (LNP) rules complete simple wireline-to-wireline and simple intermodal port requests within one business day. CenturyLink requests a limited waiver of this requirement (i.e., an extension of time)
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-107A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-107A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-107A1.txt
    • the petitioners have enacted in response to these late filings, we do not expect these petitioners to seek similar waivers in the future. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that this order is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver of section 54.904(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.904(d), filed by Western New Mexico Telephone Company, Inc., IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver of section 54.904(d) of the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1094A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1094A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1094A1.txt
    • does not preclude the Bureau from considering the waiver requests. On the contrary, when the Commission receives a request for waiver that is ``stated with clarity and accompanied by supporting data,'' such requests ``are not subject to perfunctory treatment, but must be given a hard look.'' In analyzing petitioners' requests, we consider established legal standards for waiver pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules. We have authority to waive our rules if there is ``good cause'' to do so. We may exercise our discretion to waive a rule where particular facts would make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. In this case, the special circumstance warranting a deviation from the general rule is the petitioners' commitment to include IP-based
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1096A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1096A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1096A1.txt
    • is appropriate to grant the requested waiver. This Order therefore grants GTC's waiver request. GTC may therefore proceed with either TCB certification or a Self-Declaration of Conformity pursuant to Part 68 of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.141 and 0.361 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the request for waiver of section 68.317(f) for Models LA4829HER1, LA4829HER2, LA4821HER1, PowerTel 500, PowerTel 502, and PowerTel 501, filed by Global China Technology Limited, IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: (1) the volume reset override switch shall be labeled as such and located on the telephone in such a way
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1103A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1103A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1103A1.txt
    • of the Commission's Rules that have not explicitly been waived herein. In particular, MDS Operations must satisfy the DBS protection and other requirements of Section 101.1440 of the Commission Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 101.1440. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 309 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 309, and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, the Superseding Request for Waiver filed by MDS Operations, Inc. on June 25, 2009, IS GRANTED IN PART AND OTHERWISE DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Sections 101.105(a)(4)(i), 101.113(a) note 11, and 101.147(p) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 101.105(a)(4)(i), 101.113(a) note 11, 101.147(p), are WAIVED to authorize
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1103A1_Rcd.pdf
    • provisions of the Commission's Rules that have not explicitly been waived herein. In particular, MDS Operations must satisfy the DBS protection and other requirements of Section 101.1440 of the Commission Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 101.1440.74 23.Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 309of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 309, and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, the Superseding Request for Waiver filed by MDS Operations, Inc. on June 25, 2009, IS GRANTED IN PART AND OTHERWISE DENIED. 24.ITIS FURTHER ORDERED that Sections 101.105(a)(4)(i), 101.113(a) note 11, and 101.147(p) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 101.105(a)(4)(i), 101.113(a) note 11, 101.147(p), are WAIVED to authorize MDS
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1108A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1108A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1108A1.txt
    • must file Form 323 either: (A) on or before consummation of the assignment/transfer; OR (B) by July 8, 2010, whichever is earlier. Ownership information should be reported as of November 1, 2009. . For further information, please contact Kristi Thompson, Industry Analysis Division, (202) 418-2330. Press inquiries should be directed to Janice Wise, (202) 418-8165. -FCC- See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. The Commission may waive a provision of its rules for ``good cause shown.'' 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D. C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972) (Commission may take into account considerations of ``hardship, equity, or more effective implementation of overall policy'' on an individual basis). Until the transaction
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1114A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1114A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1114A1.txt
    • the following Amateur licensees to transmit communications on behalf of their employers in connection with the exercise: for MultiCare Health System, Eric Quist, WA7WAL, and others; for Western State Hospital, Daniel Broumley, KC7OPR; for Veterans Hospital, James Baumann, KE7JQL, and Rex Johnson, KE7JQZ; for Madigan Army Medical Center, WD8AWW; and for Franciscan Health System, Angie Stann, KE7RTA, and others. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the June 24 public safety exercise by permitting the specified Amateur licensees to participate warrants this limited waiver
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1114A1_Rcd.pdf
    • the following Amateur licensees to transmit communications on behalf of their employers in connection with the exercise: for MultiCare Health System, Eric Quist, WA7WAL, and others; for Western State Hospital, Daniel Broumley, KC7OPR; for Veterans Hospital, James Baumann, KE7JQL, and Rex Johnson, KE7JQZ; for Madigan Army Medical Center, WD8AWW; and for Franciscan Health System, Angie Stann, KE7RTA, and others.1 Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the June 24public safety exercise by permitting the specified Amateur licensees to participate warrants this limited waiver of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1121A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1121A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1121A1.txt
    • See Request for Waiver at 3. Action filed its revised FCC Form 499-A on July 23, 2009. See supra footnote 13. See Request for Waiver. See Request for Waiver at 1-2. See Request for Waiver at 3. Id. Id. Id. Id. Nebraska PSC Comments at 2-3. Generally, the Commission's rules may be waived for good cause shown. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). In addition, the Commission may take into account considerations of hardship, equity, or more effective implementation of overall policy on an individual basis.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1144A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1144A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1144A1.txt
    • KJ4NNS; Wayne Bramble, KJ4NNT; Sharon Brown, KJ4NNU; Sonja Cohen, KJ4NNV; Joan Cooper, KJ4NNW; David Fletcher, KJ4NNX; William Jackson, KJ4NNY; Andrew Jobe, KJ4NOL; Wesley Leonard, KJ4NNZ; Steve Lewallen, KJ4NOA; Angela Mars, KJ4NOB; Clarence Marshall, KJ4NOC; George Mason, KJ4NOD; Ebbis Myers, KJ4NOE; Chevis Parsons, KJ4NOF; Dewey Prince, KJ4NOG; Jessie Stevenson, KJ4NOH; Thomas Waring, KJ4NOI; Randy Wilkes, KN4NOJ; and Shirley Wilson, KJ4NOK. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the July 9 public safety exercise by permitting the specified Amateur licensees to participate warrants this limited waiver
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1144A1_Rcd.pdf
    • KJ4NNS; Wayne Bramble, KJ4NNT; Sharon Brown, KJ4NNU; Sonja Cohen, KJ4NNV; Joan Cooper, KJ4NNW; David Fletcher, KJ4NNX; William Jackson, KJ4NNY; Andrew Jobe, KJ4NOL; Wesley Leonard, KJ4NNZ; Steve Lewallen, KJ4NOA; Angela Mars, KJ4NOB; Clarence Marshall, KJ4NOC; George Mason, KJ4NOD; Ebbis Myers, KJ4NOE; Chevis Parsons, KJ4NOF; Dewey Prince, KJ4NOG; Jessie Stevenson, KJ4NOH; Thomas Waring, KJ4NOI; Randy Wilkes, KN4NOJ; and Shirley Wilson, KJ4NOK. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the July 9public safety exercise by permitting the specified Amateur licensees to participate warrants this limited waiver of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1145A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1145A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1145A1.txt
    • communications in which they have a pecuniary interest, including communications on behalf of an employer. You therefore request a waiver of this rule to permit Michael Hoeft, K2MPH, who is a PCSD employee, to transmit communications on behalf of his employer in connection with this exercise. Other participants will be non-employee volunteers, whose participation does not require a waiver. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the July 14-18, 2010 public safety exercise by permitting the specified amateur licensees to participate warrants this limited
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1145A1_Rcd.pdf
    • transmitting communications in which they have a pecuniary interest, including communications on behalf of an employer. You therefore request a waiver of this rule to permit Michael Hoeft, K2MPH, who is a PCSD employee, to transmit communications on behalf of his employer in connection with this exercise.Other participants will be non-employee volunteers, whose participation does not require a waiver. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiveris shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the July 14-18, 2010 public safety exercise by permitting the specified amateur licensees to participate warrants this limited waiver
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1193A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1193A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1193A1.txt
    • percent of the population for each of its WCS licenses for mobile or point-to-multipoint services, or to construct at least five permanent links per one million people in the service area for fixed point-to-point services. Further, the Commission dismissed all pending substantial service demonstrations and pleadings filed in opposition as moot. In light of the foregoing and pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, the Bureau hereby temporarily suspends the 2.3 GHz WCS substantial service performance requirement (current section 27.14(a) of the Commission's rules) until the enhanced 2.3 GHz WCS performance requirements become effective. WCS licenses therefore will not automatically terminate under section 1.946(c) of the Commission's rules for not meeting the superseded substantial service performance requirement. Accordingly, the Bureau
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1193A1_Rcd.pdf
    • 4Id. at � 218. 5Id. at � 221. See also AT&T Inc. and BellSouth Corporation; Application for Transfer of Control, WC Docket No. 06-74, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 5662, 5816 (2007). 8230 Further, the Commission dismissed all pending substantial service demonstrations and pleadings filed in opposition as moot.6 3.In light of the foregoing and pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules,7the Bureau hereby temporarily suspends the 2.3 GHz WCS substantial service performance requirement (current section 27.14(a) of the Commission's rules) until the enhanced 2.3 GHz WCS performance requirements become effective.8WCS licenses therefore will not automatically terminate under section 1.946(c) of the Commission's rules for not meeting the superseded substantial service performance requirement.9Accordingly, the Bureau will not accept
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1232A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1232A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1232A1.txt
    • action we take today for any time period prior to the effective date of this order. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and to the authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the joint petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze as codified in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Qwest Corporation and Iowa Telecommunications, Inc. d/b/a Iowa Telecom on December 5, 2007, IS GRANTED, as described herein. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1235A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1235A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1235A1.txt
    • access their services. We extend this waiver until July 1, 2011, or until the Commission addresses pending petitions regarding CPE portability, whichever comes first. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 151, 225, and 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 225, and 251(e), and sections 0.91, 0.141, 0.291, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.141, 0.291, 0.361, and 1.3, this ORDER IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for VRS, the waivers of the one-line VCO, VCO-to-TTY, and VCO-to-VCO; one-line HCO, HCO-to-TTY, and HCO-to-HCO; call release; pay-per-call (900) calls, types of calls, and equal access to interexchange carrier requirements are hereby extended for one year until
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-124A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-124A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-124A1.txt
    • amateur licensees from transmitting communications in which they have a pecuniary interest, including communications on behalf of an employer. You therefore request a waiver of this rule to permit the following County employees to transmit communications on behalf of their employer in connection with these exercises: Jim Lutz, N9UCP; Joe Schroeder, KC9JYZ; Chris Kindelspire, KC9GCK; and John Watters, KC9KKO. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the March 24 and July 28 public safety exercises by permitting the specified amateur licensees to participate warrants
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-124A1_Rcd.pdf
    • amateur licensees from transmitting communications in which they have a pecuniary interest, including communications on behalf of an employer. You therefore request a waiver of this rule to permit the following County employees to transmit communications on behalf of their employer in connection with these exercises: Jim Lutz, N9UCP; Joe Schroeder, KC9JYZ; Chris Kindelspire, KC9GCK; and John Watters, KC9KKO. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the March 24 and July 28 public safety exercises by permitting the specified amateur licensees to participate warrants
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1263A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1263A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1263A1.txt
    • WWCI also is the licensee of noncommercial station WTTW(TV), Chicago, IL. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3615. See Public Notice, Media Bureau Announces Revised Form 323 Will Be Available Online On April 9, 2010, and Sets New Filing Deadline of July 8, 2010, DA 10-613, (MB. rel. Apr. 8, 2010). Waiver Request at 1. Id. Id. at 4. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969); Northeast Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). See Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1157. FCC Form 323-E, Question 7. Public Notice, Media Bureau Announces Online Availability of Revised Biennial Form 323, An Instructional Workshop on the Revised
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1270A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1270A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1270A1.txt
    • Id. Waiver Request at 5; Declaration of Margaret Sommers. Id.. Declaration of Margaret Sommers Declaration of Joseph J. Triarsi. Id. Id. Declaration of Joseph J. Triarsi. 47 C.F.R. � 1.925. See also Waiver Request at 1, 3 (citing 47 C.F.R. � 1.925). We note that the waiver standards of section 1.925, applied in the context of wireless proceedings, and section 1.3, applied in the context of broadcast services, are substantially the same. See Application of Delta Radio, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 16889, 16891 � 7 & n.19 (2003) (citing BellSouth Corp. v. FCC, 162 F.3d 1215, 1225 n.10 (D.C. Cir. 1999), aff'd sub nom., Delta Radio, Inc. v. FCC, 387 F.3d 897 (D.C. Cir. 2004). See Letter
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1270A1_Rcd.pdf
    • the Commission 18Waiver Request at 5; Declaration of Margaret Sommers. 19Id.. 20Declaration of Margaret Sommers 21Declaration of Joseph J. Triarsi. 22Id. 23Id. 24Declaration of Joseph J. Triarsi. 2547 C.F.R. � 1.925. See alsoWaiver Request at 1, 3 (citing 47 C.F.R. � 1.925). We note that the waiver standards of section 1.925, applied in the context of wireless proceedings, and section 1.3, applied in the context of broadcast services, are substantially the same. See Applicationof Delta Radio, Inc., Memorandum Opinionand Order, 18 FCC Rcd 16889, 16891 � 7 & n.19 (2003) (citing BellSouth Corp. v. FCC, 162 F.3d 1215, 1225 n.10 (D.C. Cir. 1999), aff'd sub nom., Delta Radio, Inc. v. FCC, 387 F.3d 897 (D.C. Cir. 2004). 9048 Mr. Lee G.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1291A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1291A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1291A1.txt
    • Cable argues that the Commission has never argued that ``common reliance'' requires that all of an operator's devices use CableCARDS. Finally, James Cable argues that there is no evidence in the record that James Cable's use of integrated devices has or would cause it to provide inferior support for retail devices. discussion James Cable filed its request pursuant to sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's Rules. In the 2007 Financial Hardship Order, the Bureau found that extraordinary financial hardships present good cause for limited waiver of the integration ban. On four separate occasions, the Bureau has granted James Cable waiver of Section 76.1204(a)(1) of the Commission's rules based on the 2007 Financial Hardship Order precedent, most recently extending the waiver
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1297A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1297A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1297A1.txt
    • and certification to the Commission that complies with all requirements of section 64.1120(e), except that the 30-day timeframes for doing so are waived herein. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.141, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Verizon New York Inc., on June 8, 2010, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Nancy Stevenson, Deputy Chief Consumer Policy Division Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau See 2000 Biennial Review-Review
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1312A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1312A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1312A1.txt
    • Section 97.113(a)(3) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 97.113(a)(3), prohibits amateur licensees from transmitting communications in which they have a pecuniary interest, including communications on behalf of an employer. You therefore request a waiver of this rule to permit the County employee Joseph Urban, N0ZFN, to transmit communications on behalf of his employer in connection with this exercise. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the July 20, 2010, public safety exercise by permitting the specified amateur licensee to participate warrants this limited
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1312A1_Rcd.pdf
    • Section 97.113(a)(3) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 97.113(a)(3), prohibits amateur licensees from transmitting communications in which they have a pecuniary interest, including communications on behalf of an employer. You therefore request a waiver of this rule to permit the County employee Joseph Urban, N0ZFN, to transmit communications on behalf of his employer in connection with this exercise. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the July 20, 2010, public safety exercise by permitting the specified amateur licensee to participate warrants this limited
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1313A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1313A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1313A1.txt
    • products for release to market, we expedited the comment period in this case. With strong support from Petitioners and the Open Mobile Video Coalition and other commenters, we have similarly expedited our review of the comments and our release of this Order. discussion In analyzing the Petitioners' requests for waiver, we consider established legal standards for waiver pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules. A waiver is appropriate where conduct is covered by our rules but there are sound public policy reasons to waive compliance in a particular case, and a waiver would not undermine the general policy served by the rule. The Commission may waive a provision of its rules for ``good cause shown.'' The Commission must take a
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1348A1_Rcd.pdf
    • BT 0n o 12 months no 10 GB www.sky.com BksyB Entrant Sky Broadband Everyday with Sky Talk ADSL+2 up to 10 MBPS/ up to 600 KBPS Pound 5 $7.68 30 11.00 monthly line rental from Sky yes - bb & phone 12 months no 10 GB www.sky.com BksyB Entrant Sky Broadband Unlimited ADSL+2 up to 20 MBPS / up to 1.3 MBPS Pound 15 $23.04 0 11.25 monthly line rental from BT 0n o 12 months no unlimited www.sky.com United Kingdom BksyB Entrant Sky Broadband Unlimited with Sky Talk ADSL+2 up to 20 MBPS / up to 1.3 MBPS Pound 10 $15.36 0 11.00 monthly line rental from Sky 0yes - bb & phone 12 months no unlimited www.sky.com BksyB Entrant
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1348A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1348A2.txt
    • rental from BT 0no 12 months no 10 GB www.sky.com BksyB Entrant Sky Broadband Everyday with Sky TalkADSL+2 up to 10 MBPS/ up to 600 KBPS Pound 5 $7.68 30 11.00 monthly line rental from Sky yes - bb & phone 12 months no 10 GB www.sky.com BksyB Entrant Sky Broadband Unlimited ADSL+2 up to 20 MBPS / up to 1.3 MBPS Pound 15 $23.04 0 11.25 monthly line rental from BT 0no 12 months no unlimited www.sky.com United Kingdom BksyB Entrant Sky Broadband Unlimited with Sky TalkADSL+2 up to 20 MBPS / up to 1.3 MBPS Pound 10 $15.36 0 11.00 monthly line rental from Sky 0yes - bb & phone 12 months no unlimited www.sky.com BksyB Entrant Sky Broadband
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1378A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1378A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1378A1.txt
    • Id. Id. , supra. Id. Id. Id. Id. 47 C.F.R. � 1.946(e)(1). 47 C.F.R. � 1.946(e)(2). 47 C.F.R. � 1.946(c). Id.; see also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990); WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969), aff'd, 459 F.2d 1203 (1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972); 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Applications Filed by Licensees in the Local Multipoint Distribution Service (LMDS) Seeking Waivers of Section101.1011 of the Commission's Rules and Extensions of Time to Construct and Demonstrate Substantial Service, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 5894, 5905 � 24 (WTB 2008) (LMDS MO&O). Consolidated Request of the WCS Coalition for Limited Waiver of Construction Deadline for 132 WCS Licenses,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1378A1_Rcd.pdf
    • interest would best be served by granting these MVDDS 4547 C.F.R. � 1.946(e)(1). 4647 C.F.R. � 1.946(e)(2). 4747 C.F.R. � 1.946(c). 48Id.; see also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990); WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969), aff'd, 459 F.2d 1203 (1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972); 47 C.F.R. �1.3. 49Applications Filed by Licensees in the Local Multipoint Distribution Service (LMDS) Seeking Waivers of Section101.1011 of the Commission's Rules and Extensions of Time to Construct and Demonstrate Substantial Service, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 5894, 5905 � 24 (WTB 2008) (LMDS MO&O). Consolidated Request of the WCS Coalition for Limited Waiver of Construction Deadline for 132 WCS Licenses,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-139A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-139A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-139A1.txt
    • the end of the use period and to take any other steps necessary to ensure that the handsets will not be made available to any person other than Agency personnel and other authorized government users. ordering clauses 6. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the Waiver Petition filed by Verizon Wireless IS GRANTED as noted herein. 7. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.191 and 0.392 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.191, 0.392. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION James Arden Barnett. Jr., Rear Admiral (Ret.) Chief, Public Safety
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1401A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1401A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1401A1.txt
    • requirement became effective in 2003, only one other company operating an in-orbit space station has surrendered an authorization after posting the bond. In that case, the company surrendered only one authorization. See Letter to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary FCC, from Jennifer Manner, Vice President, Regulatory Affairs, MSV International LLC. (June 12, 2006). EchoStar Application, Narrative at 8. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also ICO Global Communications (Holdings) Limited v. FCC, 428 F.3d 264 (D.C. Cir. 2005); Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990); WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969). Northeast Cellular, 89 F.2d at 1166; ICO Global Communications, 428 F.3d at 269 (quoting Northeast Cellular); see also WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1401A1_Rcd.pdf
    • the bond requirement became effective in 2003, only one other company operating an in-orbit space station has surrendered an authorization after posting the bond. In that case, the company surrendered only one authorization. SeeLetter to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary FCC, from Jennifer Manner, Vice President, Regulatory Affairs, MSV International LLC. (June 12, 2006). 30EchoStar Application,Narrative at 8. 3147 C.F.R. � 1.3. See alsoICO Global Communications (Holdings) Limited v. FCC, 428 F.3d 264 (D.C. Cir. 2005); Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990); WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969). 32Northeast Cellular, 89 F.2d at 1166; ICO Global Communications,428 F.3d at 269 (quoting Northeast Cellular); see also WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1157-59. 33See,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1408A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1408A3.txt
    • and SRS, to include the three types of EESS (active) instruments: scatterometers, altimeters and precipitation radars. MESs will also be susceptible to interference from the EESS (active) and SRS (active) space stations. The ITU-R has not conducted studies between the MSS and the Doppler radars. The ITU-R has also identified this band for potential UAS S&A applications under agenda item 1.3. 35 15.43 � 15.63 GHz Band Some administrations are considering the 15.43-15.63 GHz band for MSS uplinks. The band is allocated to FSS (Earth-to-space), limited to feederlinks for non-GSO MSS systems through No. 5.511A. The band is also allocated to ARNS and provision No. 4.10 of the RR applies. ITU-R studies show co-coverage sharing between the MSS and aircraft landing
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1408A3_Rcd.pdf
    • and SRS, to include the three types of EESS (active) instruments: scatterometers, altimeters and precipitation radars. MESs will also be susceptible to interference from the EESS (active) and SRS (active) space stations. The ITU-R has not conducted studies between the MSS and the Doppler radars. The ITU-R has also identified this band for potential UAS S&A applications under agenda item 1.3. 10292 15.43 � 15.63 GHz Band Some administrations are considering the 15.43-15.63 GHz band for MSS uplinks. The band is allocated to FSS (Earth-to-space), limited to feederlinks for non-GSO MSS systems through No. 5.511A. The band is also allocated to ARNS and provision No. 4.10 of the RR applies. ITU-R studies show co-coverage sharing between the MSS and aircraft landing
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1439A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1439A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1439A1.txt
    • substantially mitigate public interest concerns. Thus, CenturyLink has until February 2, 2011, to implement one-business day porting for simple wireline and simple intermodal ports. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 251 and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i)-(j), 251, 303(r) and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291 the request of CenturyLink for a waiver of the deadline for compliance with the one-business day porting requirement until February 2, 2011 IS GRANTED IN PART and otherwise IS DENIED as described
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1445A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1445A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1445A1.txt
    • we extend the waiver regarding treatment of toll free numbers in the iTRS Directory for an additional six months. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 225, and 251(e), of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 154(j), 225, and 251(e), and sections 0.91, 0.141, 0.291, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.141, 0.291, 0.361, 1.3, that this Order is ADOPTED, and that the Commission's requirement that toll free numbers and ten-digit geographic numbers not be directed to the same URI in the iTRS Directory is waived until February 4, 2011. or call the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau . FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Joel
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1447A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1447A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1447A1.txt
    • after their original FCC Form 471 filings. In such cases, applicants must file new FCC Form 471 applications for support. Accordingly, we deny their appeals. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the requests for review filed by Beth Rivka School, Buffalo City School District, Chicago Public Schools, Dale County School District, and Edison School Consortium ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon E. Gillett Chief In this order, we use the term ``appeals'' to refer generally to
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1470A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1470A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1470A1.txt
    • is no evidence of waste, fraud and abuse. Therefore, to the extent that Dodge County violated section 54.504(b)(4) of the Commission's rules, we find that good cause exists to waive this rule. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that a waiver of section 54.504(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.504(b), IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a)
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1513A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1513A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1513A1.txt
    • are considered filed upon their receipt at the location designated by the Commission and that filings, including revisions, can be made electronically through USAC's website. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154, 254, and pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 54.722(a), that the request for review filed by AT&T Inc. on June 26, 2006 IS GRANTED to the extent discussed herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154, 254,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1514A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1514A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1514A1.txt
    • decisions must be postmarked to the Commission or filed electronically in WC Docket No. 06-122 within 60 days of the issuance of the USAC decision. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154, 254, and pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 54.722(a), that the request for review and waiver filed by Airband Communications, Inc. on July 23, 2008 and the petition filed by Airband Communications, Inc. on July 23, 2008 ARE DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1537A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1537A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1537A1.txt
    • August 6, 2010 is extended to August 23, 2010. For further information regarding this Public Notice, please contact Richard Arsenault, Chief Counsel of the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Mobility Division, at (202) 418-0920, richard.arsenault@fcc.gov. Action taken pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j), and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 303(r), and Sections 0.131, 1.3, 1.46, and 1.106 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 1.3, 1.46, and 1.106. By the Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau -FCC- See Amendment of Parts 1, 22, 24, 27, 74, 80, 90, 95, and 101 To Establish Uniform License Renewal, Discontinuance of Operation, and Geographic Partitioning and Spectrum Disaggregation Rules and Policies for Certain Wireless Radio Services, WT Docket
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1537A1_Rcd.pdf
    • on August 6, 2010 is extended to August 23, 2010. For further information regarding this Public Notice, please contact RichardArsenault, Chief Counsel of the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Mobility Division, at (202) 418-0920, richard.arsenault@fcc.gov. Action taken pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j), and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 303(r), and Sections 0.131, 1.3, 1.46, and 1.106 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 1.3, 1.46, and 1.106. By the Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau -FCC- 347 C.F.R. � 1.106(g). 447 C.F.R. � 1.46. 5AT&T Motion at 2. 10916
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1601A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1601A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1601A1.txt
    • 1988. We find that Standing Rock's certification satisfies the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, as codified in sections 1.2001-1.2003 of the Commission's rules. ordering clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 214(e)(6) of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. � 214(e)(6), and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), Standing Rock Telecommunications, Inc. IS DESIGNATED AN ELIGIBLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIER for portions of its licensed service area on the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation in North Dakota and South Dakota, to the extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Standing Rock Telecommunications, Inc. SHALL SUBMIT additional
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1642A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1642A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1642A1.txt
    • per 5 megahertz or less average EIRP. The Mobility Division reserves the right to terminate the waiver authority granted to AT&T hereunder if, as a result of AT&T's prospective Petition for Reconsideration, the Commission does not modify section 27.50(a)(2) to authorize use of the above referenced equipment in the 2.3 GHz band. Action taken pursuant to 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 1.3, and 1.925. Sincerely, Roger S. Noel Chief, Mobility Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau AT&T filed the request on August 2, 2010 on behalf of its license subsidiaries, AWACS, Inc. and BellSouth Mobile Data, Inc. (collectively with its subsidiaries, AT&T) (AT&T Request). See Amendment of Part 27 of the Commission's Rules to Govern the Operation of Wireless Communications Services in the 2.3
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1642A1_Rcd.pdf
    • 2 watts per 5 megahertz or less average EIRP.10The Mobility Division reserves the right to terminate the waiver authority granted to AT&T hereunder if, as aresult of AT&T's prospective Petition for Reconsideration, the Commission does not modify section 27.50(a)(2) to authorize use of the above referenced equipment in the 2.3 GHz band. Action taken pursuant to 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 1.3, and 1.925.11 Sincerely, Roger S. Noel Chief, Mobility Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau 6Id. 7Id.at 3. 8AT&T states it has WCS deployments scheduled at two additional customer sites during August 2010.AT&T Motion at 3 and n.3 9SeeLetter from Brain Benison, Director, Federal Regulatory, AT&T, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, dated August 23, 2010 (also noting that "Sirius XM reserves its
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1643A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1643A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1643A1.txt
    • note that AT&T has consulted with the adjacent band SDARS licensee, Sirius XM, and that Sirius XM does not object to AT&T's limited request for relief. In view of the foregoing, we hereby grant AT&T until November 30, 2010 to comply with the 38 percent duty cycle limit under revised section 27.50(a)(2). Action taken pursuant to 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 1.3, and 1.925. Sincerely, Roger S. Noel Chief, Mobility Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau AT&T filed the request on August 2, 2010 on behalf of its license subsidiaries, AWACS, Inc. and BellSouth Mobile Data, Inc. (collectively with its subsidiaries, AT&T) (AT&T Request). See Amendment of Part 27 of the Commission's Rules to Govern the Operation of Wireless Communications Services in the 2.3
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1643A1_Rcd.pdf
    • note that AT&T has consulted with the adjacent band SDARS licensee, Sirius XM, and that Sirius XM does not object to AT&T's limited request for relief.10 In view of the foregoing, we hereby grant AT&T until November 30, 2010 to comply with the 38 percent duty cycle limit under revised section 27.50(a)(2). Action taken pursuant to 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 1.3, and 1.925.11 Sincerely, Roger S. Noel Chief, Mobility Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau 8AT&T states it has WCS deployments scheduled at two additional customer sites during August 2010. AT&T Motion at 3 and n.3 9WCS Report and Order�141 (noting that "SDARS licensees have not reported any instances of interference" from authorized WCS fixed CPE devices). 10SeeLetter from Brain Benison, Director, Federal
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1669A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1669A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1669A1.txt
    • Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wisconsin. Applicants state that Windstream's subsidiaries provide service in the following states: Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Iowa, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Texas. Windstream serves approximately 3.4 million access lines, 1.3 million high speed Internet customers, and 409,000 digital television customers. Q-Comm Corporation and Windstream Corporation, Applications for Consent to Transfer of Control Under Section 214 of the Communications Act, as Amended, WC Docket No. 10-169 (filed Aug. 19, 2010). 47 C.F.R. � 63.03(b). See Implementation of Further Streamlining Measures for Domestic Section 214 Authorizations, Report and Order, 17 FCC Rcd
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1675A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1675A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1675A1.txt
    • add the subject territory to its existing study area, Accipiter's requested waiver of section 69.3(e)(11) is dismissed without prejudice as moot. ordering clauseS Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the joint petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze as codified in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Accipiter Communications, Inc., and Qwest Corporation on June 20, 2006, IS DENIED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1697A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1697A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1697A1.txt
    • 30, 2007, and cautioned that any equipment deployed outside of the consolidated channels after August 30, 2007, would be ineligible for relocation funding. You therefore seek waiver relief until June 30, 2011, to reband the majority of [ORION] subscribers as well as the infrastructure at all 14 of the ORION radio site[s] with the appropriate post[-]consolidation frequencies.'' Pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and on our own motion, we find that partial grant of the waiver request, as amended, is appropriate under the circumstances presented. Specifically, we find that the public interest in providing ORION adequate time to complete the ``first touch'' on the majority of existing ORION subscribers prior to rebanding the infrastructure at
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1712A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1712A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1712A1.txt
    • All applicants must comply with our rules and procedures and continue to submit complete and accurate information to USAC as part of the application review process. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by Portland Area Indian Health Service, Portland, Oregon, IS GRANTED and REMANDED to USAC for further consideration. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1724A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1724A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1724A1.txt
    • 25, 2007) (citing ``erratic functionality'' of CDBS in the final ten minutes of the extended filing window and an outage from approximately 1:45 a.m. to 4 a.m on October 22). Alternatively, some Petitioners requested that the Commission open an additional two-hour filing window to replace the time lost due to CDBS's alleged malfunctioning during the window extension. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (``WAIT Radio''); Northeast Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (``Northeast Cellular''). See Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1157. See Media Bureau Announces NCE FM New Station and Major Change Filing Procedures for October 12 - October 19,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1725A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1725A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1725A1.txt
    • would allow Simply Living to avoid its current obligations under the Time-Share Agreement, and ``would be unfair to Bexley, who also wishes to use the unused broadcast time.'' Id. Id. Id. Additionally, throughout the Opposition, Bexley discusses its difficulties in reaching an agreement with Simply Living. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.106. 47 C.F.R. � 73.872(c)(2), (3). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (``WAIT Radio''); Northeast Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). Id. at 1166. WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1157. In the Matter of 2000 Biennial Review, 2010 WL 2780733, (CPD July 13, 2010) (citing WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1157). See Creation of a
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1730A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1730A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1730A1.txt
    • filing procedures. . We encourage carriers to use any and all methods they deem necessary to ensure that their filings are timely received. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that this order is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver of section 54.307(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.307(c), filed by Syringa Wireless, LLC IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.102(b)(1),
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1740A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1740A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1740A1.txt
    • We discuss these findings and conclusions in more detail below. Framework for Analysis Because Globalstar is requesting modification of license conditions adopted in connection with an Order granting rule waivers, we employ the level of scrutiny applied in connection with waiver of a Commission rule, in this case the ATC gating criteria. We may grant a waiver pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules if the petitioner demonstrates good cause for such action. Good cause may be found ``where particular facts would make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest.'' To make this public interest determination, the waiver cannot undermine the purposes of the rule, and there must be a stronger public interest benefit in granting the waiver than in
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1740A1_Rcd.pdf
    • these findings and conclusions in more detail below. 1. Framework for Analysis 19. Because Globalstar is requesting modification of license conditions adopted in connection with an Order granting rule waivers, we employ the level of scrutiny applied in connection with waiver of a Commission rule, in this case the ATC gating criteria. We may grant a waiver pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules if the petitioner demonstrates good cause for such action.46 Good cause may be found "where particular facts would make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest."47To make this public interest determination, the waiver cannot undermine the purposes of the rule, and there must be a stronger public interest benefit in granting the waiver than in applying
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1859A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1859A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1859A1.txt
    • and certification to the Commission that complies with all requirements of section 64.1120(e), except that the 30-day timeframes for doing so are waived herein. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.141, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Verizon New England Inc., on September 2, 2010, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Colleen Heitkamp, Chief Consumer Policy Division Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau See 2000 Biennial Review-Review of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-187A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-187A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-187A1.txt
    • Report and Order the Commission noted that true-ups are typically posted the following May and June, we note that USAC may require additional processing time. To account for this, we estimate that the typical posting interval is slightly longer. See id. Request for Review at 9. Generally, the Commission's rules may be waived for good cause shown. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F. 2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). In addition, the Commission may take into account considerations of hardship, equity, or more effective implementation of overall policy on an individual
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1882A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1882A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1882A1.txt
    • chance.'') By ``teeing up'' consideration of a system that would select the ``best qualified applicant,'' the Commission clearly announced that it was considering a licensing regime under which it would ``dismiss all of the remaining applicants [in the group] and permit them to file again in the next filing window.'' Comparative MO&O, 16 FCC Rcd at 5104. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969); Northeast Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). Id. at 1166. WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1157. Comparative MO&O, 16 FCC Rcd at 5104-05. Waiver Request at 5. Comparative MO&O at 5075. See 74 C.F.R. � 73.7003(a), (c); NCE Comparative Order at 7386; Comparative
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1885A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1885A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1885A1.txt
    • of first refusal was only implemented for the 888 code and not for the subsequent releases of the 877 and 866 codes. For all these reasons, we deny the Toll Free Coalition Petition. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i) and 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), and 251(e), sections 1.3 and 52.111 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 52.111, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91 and 0.291, that DSMI, upon release of the 855 toll free code, shall limit the number of 855 toll free numbers each Responsible Organization may reserve to one hundred per
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1909A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1909A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1909A1.txt
    • here will permit operation of the Telex headsets only inside of buildings at the nuclear power plants. As you note, Telex headsets have been used at nuclear power plants for over six years without any reported case of interference. Accordingly, pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.31 and 0.241 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.31, 0.241, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the waiver granted in WT Docket Nos. 08-166 and 08-167 and ET Docket No. 10-24 on Janurary 14, 2010 to permit use of unlicensed low power auxiliary devices in the television bands is modified as follows. The use of low power auxiliary devices will be permitted on television frequencies below 698 MHz
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1974A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1974A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1974A1.txt
    • to the shared band, and give Iridium real-time access to responsible GUSA personnel. Furthermore, Iridium contends that authority for the proposed operation should be granted only on an as-needed, special-temporary-authority basis. In response, GUSA states that it intends to coordinate operation of the proposed earth station in frequencies shared with the Iridium system so as to minimize harmful interference. Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules states that the Commission may waive its rules for ``good cause shown.'' Waiver is appropriate only if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, and such deviation would better serve the public interest than would strict adherence to the general rule. Generally, the Commission may grant a waiver of its rules in a particular
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1974A1_Rcd.pdf
    • band, and give Iridium real-time access to responsible GUSA personnel.25 Furthermore, Iridium contends that authority for the proposed operation should be granted only on an as- needed, special-temporary-authority basis.26 8. In response, GUSA states that it intends to coordinate operation of the proposed earth station in frequencies shared with the Iridium system so as to minimize harmful interference.27 9. Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules states that the Commission may waive its rules for "good cause shown."28Waiver is appropriate only if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, and such deviation would better serve the public interest than would strict adherence to the general rule.29Generally, the Commission may grant a waiver of its rules in a particular case only
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1997A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1997A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1997A1.txt
    • of support based on the new schools' discounts rates, as long as the amount of funding committed is the same or lower than in the original request. 5. ACCORDINGLY IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the petitions of Abbeville County School District, Union County School District, and Williamsburg County School District ARE GRANTED and their applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration consistent with this order to the extent provided herein. 6. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2060A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2060A2.txt
    • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 1 ATTACHMENT 1 to FCC Public Notice DA 10-2060 Recommendations presented at 26 October 2010 Meeting of the Advisory Committee for the 2012 World Radiocommunication Conference 2 Maritime Aeronautical and Radar Services 3 DOCUMENT WAC/094(26.10.10) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Draft Proposals for the Work of the conference Agenda Item 1.3: To consider spectrum requirements and possible regulatory actions, including allocations, in order to support the safe operation of unmanned aircraft systems (UAS), based on the results of ITU-R studies, in accordance with Resolution 421 (WRC-07) Background Information: Unmanned aircraft systems (UASs) enable the remote piloting of aircraft over short or long range distances within or out-of-sight of the remote pilot.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2060A2_Rcd.pdf
    • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit ATTACHMENT 1 to FCC Public Notice DA 10-2060 Recommendations presented at 26 October 2010 Meeting of the Advisory Committee for the 2012 World Radiocommunication Conference 18514 Maritime Aeronautical and Radar Services 18515 DOCUMENT WAC/094(26.10.10) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Draft Proposals for the Work of the conference Agenda Item 1.3: To consider spectrum requirements and possible regulatory actions, including allocations, in order to support the safe operation of unmanned aircraft systems (UAS), based on the results of ITU-R studies, in accordance with Resolution 421 (WRC-07) Background Information: Unmanned aircraft systems (UASs) enable the remote piloting of aircraft over short or long range distances within or out-of-sight of the remote pilot.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2060A3_Rcd.pdf
    • GHz. Recommendation ITU-R M.1372 identifies interference mitigation techniques that ensure compatibility among radar systems operating in different radiodetermination services. Additionally, Report ITU-R M.2076 contains further mitigation techniques for interference from radiolocation radars into radionavigation radars operating in the 9 GHz band. This proposal does not preclude consideration of additional AMS(R)S or AM(R)S allocations in this band under WRC-12 agenda item 1.3 or a similar agenda item for WRC-16, if necessary. 18655 Proposal: ARTICLE 5 Frequency allocations Section IV � Table of Frequency Allocations (See No. 2.1) MOD USA/AI1.21/1 15.4-18.4 GHz Reasons: This allocation will provide additional spectrum for new advanced radar systems. This additional bandwidth will provide an increase in image resolution and range accuracy. ADD USA/AI1.21/2 5.RLS In the band
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2071A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2071A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2071A1.txt
    • that the requests for review listed in the appendix ARE GRANTED and the applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 54.722(a) that Great Western Network's request for waiver IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-213A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-213A1.pdf
    • KI6BVI; David Campbell, KI6CIN; Marisa Perley, KI6EOC; Michael Barb, KI6VGW; Linda Flint, KI6VHB; Marjorie Huskins, KI6VHD; Sylvia Richardson, KI6VHH; Phil Wesley, KI6VHG; Erik Adams, KI6VHE; Ashley Burdick, KI6VHF; Melissa Little, KI6VHC; Jennifer Addington, KI6BGF; Jennifer Chaffey, KI6VGX; Rudy Carlson, KI6BVD; Marcia O'Connor, KI6BVL; Kendel Cornwell, KI6VRW; Jesse Wolfe, KI6VGY; Patricia Chagi, KI6BVF; Suzanne Dominguez, KI6BVM; and Lorraine Bell, KI6VRV. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the February 2, March 2, April 6, May 4, June 1, July 6, August 3, September 7, October
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-213A1_Rcd.pdf
    • Neidhart, KI6BVI; David Campbell, KI6CIN; Marisa Perley, KI6EOC;Michael Barb, KI6VGW; Linda Flint, KI6VHB; Marjorie Huskins, KI6VHD; Sylvia Richardson, KI6VHH; Phil Wesley, KI6VHG; Erik Adams, KI6VHE; Ashley Burdick, KI6VHF; Melissa Little, KI6VHC; Jennifer Addington, KI6BGF; Jennifer Chaffey, KI6VGX; Rudy Carlson, KI6BVD; Marcia O'Connor, KI6BVL; Kendel Cornwell, KI6VRW; Jesse Wolfe, KI6VGY; Patricia Chagi, KI6BVF; Suzanne Dominguez, KI6BVM; and Lorraine Bell, KI6VRV. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the February 2, March 2, April 6, May 4, June 1, July 6, August 3, September 7, October
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-214A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-214A1.pdf
    • single point of contact, insofar as the requirement applies to the to-be-divested properties, until such time as the Commission acts on the pending divestiture applications. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that Verizon Wireless's request to extend its previously granted waiver IS GRANTED to the extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. ��1.102(b), this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon E. Gillett Chief Wireline Competition
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2153A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2153A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2153A1.txt
    • antenna that would be covered by OTARD. This case presents two questions: (1) has the Petitioner demonstrated circumstances warranting a waiver of the size limitation in the OTARD Rule for antennas installed in the Community; and, (2) are the antenna installation restrictions as enforced by the Association valid under the OTARD rule? Waiver We deny the Petition for Waiver. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules provides that any provision of those rules may be waived for good cause shown. Further, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia has held that ``the FCC may exercise its discretion to waive a rule where particular facts would make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest.'' In this case, the Petition does
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2202A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2202A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2202A1.txt
    • is appropriate to grant the requested waiver. This Order therefore grants Plantronics' waiver request. Plantronics may therefore proceed with either TCB certification or a Self-Declaration of Conformity pursuant to Part 68 of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.141 and 0.361 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the request for waiver of section 68.317(f) for Models XLC3.4, XLC3.1, and XLC2, filed by Plantronics, Inc., IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: (1) the volume reset override switch shall be labeled as such and located on the telephone in such a way as to not be accessible to accidental engagement;
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2215A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2215A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2215A1.txt
    • filing window deadline for various funding years because we find that the petitioners failed to present special circumstances justifying a waiver of section 54.507(c) of the Commission's rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the requests for review or requests for waiver filed by the petitioners listed in appendix A ARE GRANTED and their applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2216A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2216A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2216A1.txt
    • of participants in the E-rate program to comply with the Commission's rules. Applicants continue to be responsible for requesting service delivery deadline extensions on time and in the proper format. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the appeals filed by the petitioners as listed in the appendix ARE GRANTED and the underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2217A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2217A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2217A1.txt
    • to waive the Commission's rule to enable DTS to continue operating under its existing Statewide Master Contract, which provides for two one-year extensions beyond January 29, 2012. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, that the request for waiver of 47 C.F.R. � 54.504(b) filed by the California State Department of Technology Services IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.102(b)(1), that this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Gina Spade
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-225A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-225A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-225A1.txt
    • dated March 10, 2009 (CG Docket No. 03-123). Letter from William Banks, General Counsel, CSDVRS, to Thomas Chandler, Chief, Disability Rights Office dated June 24, 2009 (CG Docket No. 03-123). This percentage is based on data we received from the Fund administrator. 47 C.F.R. � 64.604(c)(5)(iii)(E). Generally, the Commission's rules may be waived for good cause shown. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular); see also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969). We find that CSDVRS's explanation for not complying with this
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-227A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-227A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-227A1.txt
    • Evolution Order because the Subject Boxes are only capable of doing what is necessary to make digital cable programming viewable on analog television sets. For this reason we conclude that, with respect to the Subject Boxes, Petitioners have justified three-year waivers of the integration ban under the standard set forth in the 2005 Deferral Order, the Evolution Order, and Sections 1.3 or 76.7 of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, we grant the Waiver Requests, and, until three years from the release of this order, any cable operator may choose to deploy the Subject Boxes without requesting a waiver of Section 76.1204(a)(1)'s prohibition on the deployment of navigation devices ``that perform both conditional access and other functions in a single integrated device.'' ordering
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-229A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-229A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-229A1.txt
    • public interest by providing L-3 Communications with additional time to finalize delivery contracts. The numerical increase and time extension, under these circumstances, will not undermine Commission policy, as all the other waiver conditions continue to apply to the products. Accordingly, pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.31 and 0.241 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.31, 0.241, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �1.3, the waiver issued to L-3 Communications by Orders dated August 3, 2006 and September 2, 2009 is extended to August 3, 2011, to allow the marketing of a total number of 500 ProVision units until that time, effective upon release of this order. This waiver is subject to the following conditions: The ProVision
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2300A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2300A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2300A1.txt
    • was November 27, 2002. Davidson's petition for reconsideration was filed with the Commission July 6, 2006. We therefore dismiss the petition for reconsideration because it is untimely. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the petition for reconsideration filed by Davidson County Schools, Lexington, North Carolina, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Gina Spade Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Sue Whitman, Davidson County Schools, to the Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, filed
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2304A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2304A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2304A1.txt
    • filed by the petitioners as listed in the appendix ARE GRANTED and ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that section 54.504(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.504(d), IS WAIVED as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91 and 0.291
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2344A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2344A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2344A1.txt
    • 47 C.F.R. � 54.706. See Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Sixteenth Order on Reconsideration, CC Docket No. 96-45, Eighth Report and Order, CC Docket No. 96-45, Sixth Report and Order, Docket No. 96-262, 15 FCC Rcd 1679, 1687-1692, paras. 17-29 (1999) (Fifth Circuit Remand Order). Generally, the Commission's rules may be waived for good cause shown. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). In addition, the Commission may take into account considerations of hardship, equity, or more effective implementation of overall policy on an individual basis.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2346A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2346A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2346A2.txt
    • 1}}}\sectd \marglsxn1627\margrsxn1627\margtsxn2160\margbsxn2160\binfsxn7\binsxn7\sb kodd\pgnrestart\pgnlcrm\linex0\footery1440\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof \par 1.2 Scope\tab }{\field{\*\fldinst {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof SEQ SectionNumber _Toc280004898 \\* ARABIC }}{\fldrslt {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof 1}}}\sectd \marglsxn1627\margrsxn1627\margtsxn2160\margbsxn2160\binfsxn7\binsxn7\sb kodd\pgnrestart\pgnlcrm\linex0\footery1440\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof -}{\field{\*\fldinst {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof PAGEREF _Toc280004898 \\h }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof {\*\datafield 08d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b02000000080000000e0000005f0054006f0063 003200380030003000300034003800390038000000}} }{\fldrslt {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof 1}}}\sectd \marglsxn1627\margrsxn1627\margtsxn2160\margbsxn2160\binfsxn7\binsxn7\sb kodd\pgnrestart\pgnlcrm\linex0\footery1440\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof \par 1.3 Background\tab }{\field{\*\fldinst {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof SEQ SectionNumber _Toc280004899 \\* ARABIC }}{\fldrslt {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof 1}}}\sectd \marglsxn1627\margrsxn1627\margtsxn2160\margbsxn2160\binfsxn7\binsxn7\sb kodd\pgnrestart\pgnlcrm\linex0\footery1440\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof -}{\field{\*\fldinst {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof PAGEREF _Toc280004899 \\h }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof {\*\datafield 08d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b02000000080000000e0000005f0054006f0063 003200380030003000300034003800390039000000}} }{\fldrslt {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof 1}}}\sectd \marglsxn1627\margrsxn1627\margtsxn2160\margbsxn2160\binfsxn7\binsxn7\sb kodd\pgnrestart\pgnlcrm\linex0\footery1440\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof \par 1.4 Attributes\tab }{\field{\*\fldinst {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \lang1024\langfe1024\noproof SEQ SectionNumber
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2352A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2352A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2352A1.txt
    • Commission within a reasonable period of time after receiving actual notice of USAC's adverse decision, or because of circumstances beyond the applicants' control. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review and/or Requests for Waiver filed by the petitioners as listed in the appendices ARE GRANTED and the applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2354A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2354A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2354A1.txt
    • appendix and issue an award or a denial based on a complete review and analysis no later than 120 calendar days from the release date of this order. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the requests for review filed by the petitioners listed in the appendix ARE GRANTED and their applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-235A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-235A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-235A1.txt
    • the extent that a particular market's anticipated relocation date is later than that projected in the Supplemental Request, Sprint Nextel must provide a more detailed discussion of why it revised the estimated completion date. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and (j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 C.F.R. �� 154(i) and (j), and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that the deadline by which Sprint Nextel must complete relocation of the broadcast auxiliary service to frequencies above 2025 MHz IS WAIVED until August 9, 2010 for the 28 Designated Market Areas described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Joint Request is GRANTED consistent with the terms of this order. IT
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2370A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2370A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2370A1.txt
    • addition, we also find good cause to waive section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, which establishes deadlines for affected parties to seek review of decisions issued by USAC. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review and Request for Waiver ARE GRANTED and the applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration consistent with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2418A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2418A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2418A1.txt
    • regulation in its provision of in-region, interstate and international, long distance services or cease providing those services through an entity other than a rule 64.1903 separate affiliate. We take this action pursuant to our authority under sections 203(a) and 203((b)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (Communications Act or Act) as well as our waiver authority under section 1.3 of the Commission's rules. With regard to tariffing, section 203((b)(2) authorizes the Commission, ``in its discretion and for good cause shown'' to ``modify any requirement made by or under the authority of [section 203].'' Given the costs that dominant carrier regulation would impose on PRT as well as the safeguards under which it will provide those services in the event
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2424A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2424A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2424A1.txt
    • review. We waive the E-rate technology plan requirements for these petitioners and remand the applications listed in the appendix to USAC for further action consistent with this order. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the requests for review or requests for waiver filed by the petitioners listed in appendix ARE GRANTED and their applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further action consistent with this order no later than 90 calendar days from the release date of this order. IT
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2425A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2425A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2425A1.txt
    • Commission within a reasonable period of time after receiving actual notice of USAC's adverse decisions, or because of circumstances beyond the applicants' control. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review and/or Requests for Waiver filed by the petitioners as listed in the Appendix ARE GRANTED and the applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2433A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2433A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2433A1.txt
    • 1988. We find that Virgin Mobile's certification satisfies the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, as codified in sections 1.2001-1.2003 of the Commission's rules. ordering clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 214(e)(6) of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. � 214(e)(6), and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 54.722(a), Virgin Mobile USA, L.P. IS DESIGNATED AN ELIGIBLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIER eligible only for Lifeline support for portions of its licensed service areas in Alabama, Connecticut, the District of Columbia, Delaware, and New Hampshire, to the extent described in this order and subject to the conditions set forth
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-246A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-246A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-246A1.txt
    • Kevin Westmoreland, KJ4RNH; Benny Evans, KJ4RNE; Teresa Sauls, KJ4QQS; Constance Rice, KJ4QQT; Faye Taylor, KJ4QQU; Shirley Churchwell, KJ4QQV; Jeffrey Laird, KJ4QQW; Robert Knox, KJ4QQX; Sherry Gragg, KJ4QQY; Vickie Ansley, KJ4QQZ; Tonya Chitwood, KJ4QVA; Rebecca Williams, KJ4QVB; Katherine Harbert, KJ4QVC; Teresa Cheek, KJ4QVD; Mary Ann Johnson, KJ4QVE; Tina DeBord, KJ4QVF; Elizabeth Hughes, KJ4QVG; Fredda Dooley, KJ4QVH; and Vickie Dobbs, KJ4QVI. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the March 17 public safety exercise by permitting the specified amateur licensees to participate warrants this limited waiver
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-246A1_Rcd.pdf
    • Kevin Westmoreland, KJ4RNH; Benny Evans, KJ4RNE; Teresa Sauls, KJ4QQS; Constance Rice, KJ4QQT; Faye Taylor, KJ4QQU; Shirley Churchwell, KJ4QQV; Jeffrey Laird, KJ4QQW; Robert Knox, KJ4QQX; Sherry Gragg, KJ4QQY; Vickie Ansley, KJ4QQZ; Tonya Chitwood, KJ4QVA; Rebecca Williams, KJ4QVB; Katherine Harbert, KJ4QVC; Teresa Cheek, KJ4QVD; Mary Ann Johnson, KJ4QVE; Tina DeBord, KJ4QVF; Elizabeth Hughes, KJ4QVG; Fredda Dooley, KJ4QVH; and Vickie Dobbs, KJ4QVI. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the March 17 public safety exercise by permitting the specified amateur licensees to participate warrants this limited waiver
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-247A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-247A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-247A1.txt
    • connection with these exercises: Ann Cadgene, KI6TFG; Stephen Rios, KI6DUC; Michael Olson, KI6ZMS; Theresa Lombardi, KI6QCR; and Jeremy Nichols, N6WFO. You also request a similar waiver for amateur licensees listed in your request who are employees of other entities participating in these drills, mostly health care facilities, to transmit on behalf of their employers in connection with these exercises. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the March 10, April 14, May 12, June 9, July 14, August 11, September 8, October 13, November
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-247A1_Rcd.pdf
    • employer in connection with these exercises: Ann Cadgene, KI6TFG; Stephen Rios, KI6DUC; Michael Olson, KI6ZMS; Theresa Lombardi, KI6QCR; and Jeremy Nichols, N6WFO.You also request a similar waiver for amateur licensees listed in your request who are employees of other entities participating in these drills, mostly health care facilities, to transmit on behalf of theiremployers in connection with these exercises.1 Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the March 10, April 14, May 12, June 9, July 14, August 11, September 8, October 13, November
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-253A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-253A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-253A1.txt
    • or other paid listing, DISH Network's concern that it would have to establish new relationships with directory publishers is inapplicable, and there is therefore no reason to waive the telephone directory requirement. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i) and 713 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i) and 613, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.141 and 0.361 of the Commission's rules (47 C.F.R. �� 0.141 and 0.361), 47 C.F.R. � 79.1(i)(1) and (i)(2) IS WAIVED to the extent described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Joel Gurin Chief Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 79.1. See Closed Captioning of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-267A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-267A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-267A1.txt
    • net bid for the Baggs construction permit, or $630. Pursuant to section 1.2106(e) of the Commission's rules, we will apply Mr. Austin's payment on deposit to satisfy this interim default payment obligation. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i) and 309 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i) and 309, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that Ted W. Austin, Jr.'s Request for Waiver, dated September 28, 2007, is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i) and 309 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i) and 309, and sections 1.2107(b), 1.2109(b), and 1.2104(g), of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.2107(b),
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-267A1_Rcd.pdf
    • down payment," and concluded that such conduct "would undermine the integrity of the auction itself."31Accordingly, to date, the Commission has consistently denied every request for waiver of the down payment deadline.32Mr. Austin presents no arguments that persuade us to depart from our policy 2447 C.F.R. � 1.2107(b). See Auction 62Procedures Public Notice, 20 FCC Rcd at 10535. 2547 C.F.R. � 1.3.This waiver standard, and the waiver standard applied in the context of wireless radio services licenses, 47 C.F.R. � 1.925, have been found to be substantially the same. SeeDelta Radio, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order,18 FCC Rcd 16889, 16891 � 7 &n.19 (2003) (citing Bellsouth Corporation v. FCC,162 F.3d 1215, 1225 n.10 (D.C. Cir. 1999)). 26See, e.g., Northeast Cellular Tel. Co.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-34A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-34A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-34A1.txt
    • Cablevision has demonstrated a strong need to encrypt the basic service tier, has committed to take steps necessary to mitigate harm to its subscribers, and through the reporting requirement will provide valuable data to the Commission relative to the impact of this waiver in its New York City franchise areas. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 1.3, 76.7, and 76.630(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 76.7, 76.630(a), the request for waiver filed by Cablevision Systems Corporation of Section 76.630(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 76.630(a), IS GRANTED to allow Cablevision to encrypt the basic service tier in Cablevision's New York City franchise areas pursuant to the terms and conditions discussed herein. The
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-373A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-373A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-373A1.txt
    • the ability to also purchase low-cost set-top boxes from third parties,'' and has approached set-top box refurbishing companies about the prospects of selling refurbished set-top boxes directly to Baja's subscribers. At least one company indicated that it would be willing to sell devices directly to consumers if Baja's waiver request were granted. discussion Baja filed its request pursuant to Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's rules. The Bureau has granted waiver of the integration ban pursuant to those rule sections in cases of non-speculative, extraordinary financial hardship. In light of Baja's demonstrated financial hardship, and consistent with Bureau precedent, we conclude that a limited grant of Baja's request for waiver of the integration ban for non-HD, non-DVR set-top boxes is
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-402A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-402A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-402A1.txt
    • of this rule to permit the following County employees to transmit communications on behalf of their employer in connection with these exercises: James Gangl, KC0WDR; Grant Forsyth, KC0WUP; Dave Glesener, AC0EP; Kathleen Pettit, KC0YVM; Mark Snyder, AC0LE; John Lindquist, KC0WCV; Gary Collyard, KC0WCY; Carol Saranpaa, KC0WCT; Mark Nelson, KC0WUN; Nancy Christensen, KC0YVI; Keith Granholm, KD0EGN; and Michelle MacDonald, KC0WCU. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the April 19 public safety exercise by permitting the specified amateur licensees to participate warrants this limited waiver
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-402A1_Rcd.pdf
    • waiver of this rule to permit the following County employees to transmit communications on behalf of their employer in connection with these exercises: James Gangl, KC0WDR; Grant Forsyth, KC0WUP; Dave Glesener, AC0EP;Kathleen Pettit, KC0YVM; Mark Snyder, AC0LE; John Lindquist, KC0WCV; Gary Collyard, KC0WCY; Carol Saranpaa, KC0WCT; Mark Nelson, KC0WUN; Nancy Christensen, KC0YVI; Keith Granholm, KD0EGN; and Michelle MacDonald, KC0WCU. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the April 19 public safety exercise by permitting the specified amateur licensees to participate warrants this limited waiver
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-403A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-403A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-403A1.txt
    • their employers in connection with this exercise: Name Call Sign Employer Jeff Hahn KE7KLV Boyd Gaming Michael Buchna KF7EDZ University Medical Center Robert Hill AE7BX University Medical Center Shane Lattin KF7EDU University Medical Center James O'Brien KE7YBG Clark County Andy Gagliardo N7SGV Clark County Keith Aurich KD7TOF Clark County Mike Odom KE7NVH Clark County Lester Lewis KF7BCC Clark County Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the March 11 public safety exercise by permitting the specified amateur licensees to participate warrants this limited waiver
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-403A1_Rcd.pdf
    • their employers in connection with this exercise: Name Call Sign Employer Jeff Hahn KE7KLV Boyd Gaming Michael Buchna KF7EDZ University Medical Center Robert Hill AE7BX University Medical Center Shane Lattin KF7EDU University Medical Center James O'Brien KE7YBG Clark County Andy Gagliardo N7SGV Clark County Keith Aurich KD7TOF Clark County Mike Odom KE7NVH Clark County Lester Lewis KF7BCC Clark County Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the March 11 public safety exercise by permitting the specified amateur licensees to participate warrants this limited waiver
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-404A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-404A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-404A1.txt
    • connection with these exercises: Ken Conradi, KF7FDN; Steve Monsey, N0FPF; Laurel Nelson, KE7DQA; Mark Sheppard, N7LYE; and Ned Worcester, KB7NFO. You also request a similar waiver for amateur licensees listed in your request who are employees of other entities participating in these drills, mostly health care facilities, to transmit on behalf of their employers in connection with these exercises. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the March 18, April 15, May 20, June 17, July 15, August 19, September 16, October 21, November
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-404A1_Rcd.pdf
    • in connection with these exercises: Ken Conradi, KF7FDN; Steve Monsey, N0FPF; Laurel Nelson, KE7DQA; Mark Sheppard, N7LYE; and Ned Worcester, KB7NFO.You also request a similar waiver for amateur licensees listed in your request who are employees of other entities participating in these drills, mostly health care facilities, to transmit on behalf of their employers in connection with these exercises.1 Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the March 18, April 15, May 20, June 17, July 15, August 19, September 16, October 21, November
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-425A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-425A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-425A1.txt
    • facilities participating in the exercise to transmit communications on behalf of their employer in connection with the exercise: for St. Mary's Medical Center, Lawrence D. Lucas, KD8JHW, and Charles F. Herr, WD8AGH; for VA Medical Center, Shelby Neuhouser, KC8JIG, and David R. Reuschel, KC8LUG; and for Cabell County Hospital, Mike Nimmo, WN8H, Charles Bishop, KD4VQW, and Mark Baldwin, KI4NPF. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the March 13 public safety exercise by permitting the specified amateur licensees to participate warrants this limited waiver
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-425A1_Rcd.pdf
    • facilities participating in the exercise to transmit communications on behalf of their employer in connection with the exercise: for St. Mary's Medical Center, Lawrence D. Lucas, KD8JHW, and Charles F. Herr, WD8AGH; for VA Medical Center, Shelby Neuhouser, KC8JIG, and David R. Reuschel, KC8LUG; and for Cabell County Hospital, Mike Nimmo, WN8H, Charles Bishop, KD4VQW, and Mark Baldwin, KI4NPF. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the March 13 public safety exercise by permitting the specified amateur licensees to participate warrants this limited waiver
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-426A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-426A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-426A1.txt
    • Valerie Campbell, KJ4LKZ; for Medical Reserve Corps, Eric Bullington, KJ4HIQ; for Palmetto Health, Robert Chartier, KI4VRP, Mary Cromer, KJ4LLE, Eric McFarland, KJ4HIT, Melissa Moody, KJ4LLN, Eric Atkinson, KI4VRJ, Kim Elkins, KI4VRT, Ronald Johnson, WA4ZYB, and David Morgan, KI4VRE; for Tucker Nursing Center, John Spires, KJ4BCZ; and for the University of South Carolina, William Dease, KI4PKO, and Karen Pendleton, KJ4DII. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the April 21 public safety exercise by permitting the specified amateur licensees to participate warrants this limited waiver
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-426A1_Rcd.pdf
    • Center, Valerie Campbell, KJ4LKZ; for Medical Reserve Corps, Eric Bullington, KJ4HIQ; for Palmetto Health, Robert Chartier, KI4VRP, Mary Cromer, KJ4LLE, Eric McFarland, KJ4HIT, Melissa Moody, KJ4LLN, Eric Atkinson, KI4VRJ, Kim Elkins, KI4VRT, Ronald Johnson, WA4ZYB, and David Morgan, KI4VRE;for Tucker Nursing Center, John Spires, KJ4BCZ; and for the University of South Carolina, William Dease, KI4PKO, and Karen Pendleton, KJ4DII. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if goodcause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the April 21 public safety exercise by permitting the specified amateur licensees to participate warrants this limited waiver of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-427A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-427A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-427A1.txt
    • 47 C.F.R. � 54.706. See Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Sixteenth Order on Reconsideration, CC Docket No. 96-45, Eighth Report and Order, CC Docket No. 96-45, Sixth Report and Order, Docket No. 96-262, 15 FCC Rcd 1679, 1687-1692, paras. 17-29 (1999) (Fifth Circuit Remand Order). Generally, the Commission's rules may be waived for good cause shown. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). In addition, the Commission may take into account considerations of hardship, equity, or more effective implementation of overall policy on an individual basis.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-464A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-464A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-464A1.txt
    • Order because the Subject Boxes are only capable of doing what is necessary to make digital cable programming viewable on analog television sets. For this reason we conclude that, with respect to the Subject Boxes, COSHIP has justified a three-year waiver of the integration ban under the standard set forth in the 2005 Deferral Order, the Evolution Order, and Sections 1.3 or 76.7 of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, we grant the Waiver Request, and, until three years from the release of this order, any cable operator may choose to deploy the Subject Boxes without requesting a waiver of Section 76.1204(a)(1)'s prohibition on the deployment of navigation devices ``that perform both conditional access and other functions in a single integrated device.'' ordering
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-474A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-474A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-474A1.txt
    • which the reply is directed . . . .'' Given that this is a docketed proceeding in which all comments will be posted to the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System and that the proceeding involves fourteen petitioners, we hereby waive the requirement that parties be served hard copies of the comments and reply comments in this proceeding, pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commissions rules. All filings must reference MB Docket No. 10-71. In order to be considered part of the official record, comments must be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing paper copies. Comments sent via e-mail to the Commission that do not use the ECFS
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-490A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-490A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-490A1.txt
    • Bruce Jackson, KJ6CSI; William Kemp, KJ6CSX; Craig Midget, KJ6CSQ; Pamela Oroscoe, KJ6CSM; Nicha Panich, KJ6CSJ; Alicia Segovia, KJ6CSP; Gary Sparks, KI6UKX; Leticia Vega, KJ6CSR; Judy Webber, KJ6CSK; Devin Hughie, KJ6CSV; Pamela Mitchell, KJ6CSU; Christine Barber, KJ6EMT; Dominique Davis, KJ6CST; and Christopher Riccardi, WW6WTF. Participants for the Sheriff's Department will be non-employee volunteers, whose participation does not require a waiver. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the March 26, April 22, May 4, June 17, and August 27 public safety exercise by permitting the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-490A1_Rcd.pdf
    • Bruce Jackson, KJ6CSI; William Kemp, KJ6CSX; Craig Midget, KJ6CSQ; Pamela Oroscoe, KJ6CSM; Nicha Panich, KJ6CSJ; Alicia Segovia, KJ6CSP; Gary Sparks, KI6UKX; Leticia Vega, KJ6CSR; Judy Webber, KJ6CSK; Devin Hughie, KJ6CSV; Pamela Mitchell, KJ6CSU; Christine Barber, KJ6EMT; Dominique Davis, KJ6CST; and Christopher Riccardi, WW6WTF. Participants for the Sheriff's Department will be non-employee volunteers, whose participation does not require a waiver. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the March 26, April 22, May 4, June 17, and August 27 public safety exercise by permitting the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-505A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-505A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-505A1.txt
    • pursuant to sections 1, 4 (i) and (j), 201-209, of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i) and (j), 201-209, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91 and 0.291, this order is HEREBY ADOPTED as described above. 14. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commissions rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91 and 0.291, section 61.49(k) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 61.49(k), IS WAIVED for the purpose specified in paragraph 4 supra. 15. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.3 of the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-51A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-51A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-51A1.txt
    • we deny Allband's petition, Allband will receive high-cost loop support pursuant to sections 36.611 and 36.12 for costs incurred since commencement of its customer operations. ordering clauseS Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of sections 69.611 and 69.612 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 69.611 and 69.612, filed by Direct Communications Cedar Valley, LLC on August 29, 2006, IS DENIED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), and 254 of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-542A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-542A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-542A1.txt
    • KE5QPK; Michelle Markham, KE5GIS; Glenda Redeemer, KE5UZA; Eve Roussin, KE5UZC; Jennifer Thomas, KE5QPV; and Mark Wilson, KE5QPE. You also request a similar waiver for amateur licensees listed in your request who are employees of other entities participating in these drills, mostly employees of other Tarrant County agencies, to transmit on behalf of their employers in connection with these exercises. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the April 16, May 21, June 18, July 16, August 20, September 17, October 15, November 19, and
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-542A1_Rcd.pdf
    • Manning, KE5QPK; Michelle Markham, KE5GIS; Glenda Redeemer, KE5UZA; Eve Roussin, KE5UZC; Jennifer Thomas, KE5QPV; and Mark Wilson, KE5QPE.You also request a similar waiver for amateur licensees listed in your request who are employees of other entities participating in these drills, mostly employees of other Tarrant County agencies, to transmit on behalf of their employers in connection with these exercises.2 Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the April 16, May 21, June 18, July 16, August 20, September 17, October 15, November 19, and
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-543A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-543A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-543A1.txt
    • in connection with the exercise: Betty Amos, KD0CDP; Michael Baughman, KC0VVP; Christian Cooley, KD0BSI; Lawrence Eker, WA0YQM; Bob Evans, KC0VVQ; Jeffrey Froman, KD0CBT; Ralph Golubski, KD0JQL; Alan Hancock, W0SED; Merle McCullough, N0VDR; Edwin Rust, KD0BKH; Leslie Still, KD0CDG; and Joel Thornton, KD0GSP. Participants for Platte and Johnson Counties will be non-employee volunteers, whose participation does not require a waiver. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the April 7 public safety exercise by permitting the specified amateur licensees to participate warrants this limited waiver
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-543A1_Rcd.pdf
    • employer in connection with the exercise: Betty Amos, KD0CDP; Michael Baughman, KC0VVP; Christian Cooley, KD0BSI; Lawrence Eker, WA0YQM; Bob Evans, KC0VVQ; JeffreyFroman, KD0CBT; Ralph Golubski, KD0JQL; Alan Hancock, W0SED; Merle McCullough, N0VDR; Edwin Rust, KD0BKH; Leslie Still, KD0CDG; and Joel Thornton, KD0GSP. Participants for Platte and Johnson Counties will be non-employee volunteers, whose participation does not require a waiver. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the April 7 public safety exercise by permitting the specified amateur licensees to participate warrants this limited waiver
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-571A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-571A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-571A1.txt
    • Kuhn, KI6SZB; Linda Fraser, KJ6ASB; Wilma Rawlings, KJ6ASG; Carol Ripplinger, KJ6ASI; and David Hendrick, N1PPP. You also request a similar waiver for amateur licensees listed in your request who are employees of other entities participating in these drills, employees of participating health care facilities and other counties, to transmit on behalf of their employers in connection with this exercise. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the May 4, 2010 public safety exercise by permitting the specified amateur licensees to participate warrants this limited
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-571A1_Rcd.pdf
    • Borg, KI6LAC; Valdine Kuhn, KI6SZB; Linda Fraser, KJ6ASB; Wilma Rawlings, KJ6ASG; Carol Ripplinger, KJ6ASI;and David Hendrick, N1PPP.You also request a similar waiver for amateur licensees listed in your request who are employees of other entities participating in these drills, employees of participating health care facilities and other counties, to transmiton behalf of their employers in connection with this exercise.1 Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the May 4, 2010 public safety exercise by permitting the specified amateur licensees to participate warrants this limited
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-572A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-572A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-572A1.txt
    • interest, including communications on behalf of an employer. You therefore request a waiver of this rule to permit the following amateur licensees who are Community employees to transmit communications on behalf of their employer in connection with this exercise: Myron Oestreich, KB9STB; and Roger Miller, KC9RTK. Other participants will be non-employee volunteers, whose participation does not require a waiver. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the May 1, 2010 public safety exercise by permitting the specified amateur licensees to participate warrants this limited
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-572A1_Rcd.pdf
    • a pecuniary interest, including communications on behalf of an employer. You therefore request a waiver of this rule to permit the following amateur licensees who are Community employees to transmitcommunications on behalf of their employer in connection with this exercise: Myron Oestreich, KB9STB; and Roger Miller, KC9RTK.Other participants will be non-employee volunteers, whose participation does not require a waiver. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the May 1, 2010 public safety exercise by permitting the specified amateur licensees to participate warrants this limited
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-593A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-593A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-593A1.txt
    • not think that such a lengthy extension will be necessary, and so grant a second four-month extension. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 225, 251(e), and 255 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 154(j), 225, 251(e), and 255, and sections 0.91, 0.141, 0.291, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.141, 0.291, 0.361, 1.3, that this Order is ADOPTED, and that the Commission's requirement that toll free numbers and ten-digit geographic numbers not be directed to the same URI in the iTRS Directory is waived until August 4, 2010. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Request to Extend Waiver filed by the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-605A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-605A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-605A1.txt
    • Amateur licensees to transmit communications on behalf of their employer in connection with the exercise: for ANMC Hospital, Robert Berger, KL2VA; for University of Alaska Police Department, Peter Summers, KL2GY; for State of Alaska Division of Homeland Security, John Ramsey, KD6YKS, Patrick Tipton, KL0YO, and Glenn Hansen, KL1BR; and for State of Alaska Air National Guard, Michael O'Keefe, KL7MD. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the April 26 to May 1 public safety exercise by permitting the specified amateur licensees to participate warrants
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-605A1_Rcd.pdf
    • Amateur licensees to transmit communications on behalf of their employer in connection with the exercise: for ANMC Hospital, Robert Berger, KL2VA; for University of Alaska Police Department, Peter Summers, KL2GY; for State of Alaska Division of Homeland Security, John Ramsey, KD6YKS, Patrick Tipton, KL0YO, and Glenn Hansen, KL1BR; and for State of Alaska Air National Guard, Michael O'Keefe, KL7MD. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the April 26 to May 1 public safety exercise by permitting the specified amateur licensees to participate warrants
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-60A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-60A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-60A1.txt
    • that was never implemented. TerreStar requests waiver of these rule provisions and also requests waiver of Section 25.252(a)(4), which prescribes a restriction on siting base stations in the vicinity of airports. New DBSD supports the waiver requests, and Sprint Nextel comments that the requested technical waivers ``appear unlikely to materially increase the risk of interference to adjacent channel licensees.'' Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules states that the Commission may waive its rules for ``good cause shown,'' and it is well-established that waiver of a Commission rule is appropriate when granting such relief would not undermine the rule's policy objective and would better serve the public interest than requiring strict compliance. The technical rules at issue here were adopted for the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-60A1_Rcd.pdf
    • was never implemented. TerreStar requests waiver of these rule provisions and also requests waiver of Section 25.252(a)(4), which prescribes a restriction on siting base stations in the vicinity of airports. 21. New DBSD supports the waiver requests,63and Sprint Nextel comments that the requested technical waivers "appear unlikely to materially increase the risk of interference to adjacent channel licensees."64 22. Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules65states that the Commission may waive its rules for "good cause shown," and it is well-established that waiver of a Commission rule is appropriate when granting such relief would not undermine the rule's policy objective66and would better serve the public interest than requiring strict compliance.67The technical rules at issue here were adopted for the purpose of preventing
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-625A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-625A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-625A1.txt
    • C.F.R. � 63.10(c)(2). 47 C.F.R. � 63.10(c)(4). The ``no special concessions'' rule prohibits U.S. carriers from agreeing to accept special concessions from any foreign carriers that possess sufficient market power on the foreign end of a U.S.-international route to affect competition adversely in the U.S. market. 47 C.F.R. � 63.14. See OPT Waiver Request at 10-11. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (2003). See also Northeast Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1167 (1990); WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (1969). We also note that OPT will be subject to the Commissions' rules and safeguards for cable landing licensees, including the no special concession rule and reporting requirements. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.767(g)(5), 1.767(l). See also Cable Landing
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-625A1_Rcd.pdf
    • U.S.-French Polynesia route;52and (b) quarterly circuit status 45The "no special concessions" rule prohibits U.S. carriers from agreeing to accept special concessions from any foreign carriers that possess sufficient market power on the foreign end of a U.S.-international route to affect competition adversely in the U.S. market. 47 C.F.R. � 63.14. See OPT Waiver Request at 10-11. 46See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (2003).See also Northeast Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1167 (1990); WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (1969). 47We also note that OPT will be subject to the Commissions' rules and safeguards for cable landing licensees, including the no special concession rule and reporting requirements. See47 C.F.R. � 1.767(g)(5), 1.767(l). See also Cable Landing License Order,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-628A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-628A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-628A1.txt
    • that the contents of the petition are true.''). Finer Living, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 5 FCC 2d 984, 987 (1966). 47 C.F.R. � 73.3587. We note that, like petitions to deny, informal objections must be signed. As discussed, Lewis' pleading was not signed. Nevertheless, we waive that requirement, and consider Lewis' Objection on its merits. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. 47 U.S.C. � 310(d). (informal objections, like petitions to deny, must contain adequate and specific factual allegations sufficient to warrant the relief requested). . See Ingles, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 8815, 8820 n. 32 (2008). See also, WGPR, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 10 FCC Rcd 8140, 8142-46 (1995) (``WGPR''), vacated on other grounds sub nom, Serafyn
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-64A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-64A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-64A1.txt
    • with these exercises: Dan Liedl, KB0BQJ; Mark Fulmer, KE5PHU; Stewart De Journett, KE5UYM; Stan Geisler, KE5UYP; and Frank Knox, KS5F. You also request a similar waiver for amateur licensees listed in your request who are employees of other entities participating in these drills, mostly health care facilities, to transmit on behalf of their employers in connection with these exercises. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the January 22, February 5, March 5, April 2, May 7, June 4, and July 2, 2010, public
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-64A1_Rcd.pdf
    • connection with these exercises: Dan Liedl, KB0BQJ; Mark Fulmer, KE5PHU; Stewart De Journett, KE5UYM; Stan Geisler, KE5UYP; and Frank Knox, KS5F.You also request a similar waiver for amateur licensees listed in your request who are employees of other entities participating in these drills, mostly health care facilities, to transmit on behalf of their employers in connection with these exercises.2 Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the January 22, February 5, March 5, April 2, May 7, June 4, and July 2, 2010, public
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-666A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-666A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-666A1.txt
    • exercises: Drew Fried, KC2WPL; Ward Neal, KC2QKA; Joseph Indelicato, KC2TNH; Peter Gallauresi, KC2TMW; and Matthew DeLafayette, KC2VWS. You also request a similar waiver for amateur licensees listed in your request who are employees of other entities participating in these drills, primarily employees of participating health care facilities, to transmit on behalf of their employers in connection with this exercises. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the May 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25, and 26, 2010 public safety exercises by permitting the specified
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-666A1_Rcd.pdf
    • these exercises: Drew Fried, KC2WPL; Ward Neal, KC2QKA; Joseph Indelicato, KC2TNH; Peter Gallauresi, KC2TMW; and Matthew DeLafayette, KC2VWS.You also request a similar waiver for amateur licensees listed in your request who are employees of other entities participating in these drills, primarily employees of participating health care facilities, to transmit on behalf of their employers in connection with this exercises.1 Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is 1The request, including the entire roster, is set forth in the Commission's Universal Licensing System as an attachment under each of the licenses listed above. 3817 New York
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-676A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-676A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-676A1.txt
    • and fixed stations). The marketing and/or sale of the device to end users or consumers is prohibited. The grantee is required to include sufficiently detailed installation instructions and guidelines to ensure that licensees locate the BreezeMAX Si CPE in a manner that will maintain appropriate human exposure separations at all times. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to the authority in Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. section 1.3, and Sections 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. Sections 154(i), IT IS ORDERED that a limited waiver of Section 90.1321(c) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 90.1321(c), is granted to Alvarion, Ltd. to permit the operation of the BreezeMAX Si CPE, File No. LKT-BMAX-SI36, in the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-676A1_Rcd.pdf
    • limit the marketing and sale of the device to 3650 MHz 233650 MHz Order, 20 FCC Rcd at 6514 n 54. 24Id. 2547 C.F.R. � 90.1321(c) (limits mobile and portable stations to 1 watt/25 MHz EIRP andfurther provides that, in any event, the peak EIRP density shall not exceed 40 milliwatts in any one-megahertz slice of spectrum). 26See47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see also ICO Global Communications (Holdings) Limited v. FCC, 428 F.3d 264 (D.C. Cir. 2005); Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular); WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969), aff'd, 459 F.2d 1203 (1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972). 27See Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166; ICO Global,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-697A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-697A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-697A1.txt
    • Julie Greenly, NH7ZY; Clement Jung, AH7HO; Anson Kimura, AH7ZZ; and Danny Tengan, NH7ZT. You also request a similar waiver for amateur licensees listed in your request who are employees of other entities participating in these drills, primarily employees of other government agencies and participating health care facilities, to transmit on behalf of their employers in connection with this exercise. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating amateur operations on May 29 and June 1, 2010, in support of the May 24-June 4, 2010 public
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-697A1_Rcd.pdf
    • AH6QO; Julie Greenly, NH7ZY; Clement Jung, AH7HO; Anson Kimura, AH7ZZ; and Danny Tengan, NH7ZT.You also request a similar waiver for amateur licensees listed in your request who are employees of other entities participating in these drills, primarily employees of other government agencies and participating health care facilities, to transmit on behalf of their employers in connection with this exercise.1 Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3,provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating amateur operations on May 29 and June 1, 2010, in support of the May 24-June 4, 2010 public safety
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-72A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-72A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-72A1.txt
    • demonstrate that the criteria necessary to establish good cause for a waiver have been met; therefore, NTD's waiver petition is denied. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1, 3, 4(i), 201-205, 251, and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 153, 154(i), 201-205, 251, 303(r), and sections 1.3 and 61.26 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 61.26, and the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, the petition for waiver by Northern Telephone & Data Corp. IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon E. Gillett Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see also WAIT Radio
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-748A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-748A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-748A1.txt
    • IAS support. . We encourage carriers to use any and all methods they deem necessary to ensure that their filings are timely received. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.802(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.802(a), filed by Nebraska Technology & Telecommunications, Inc., IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-749A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-749A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-749A1.txt
    • with Commission precedent. . We encourage filers to use any and all methods they deem necessary to ensure their filings are timely received. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.314(d)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.314(d)(1), filed by the Georgia Public Service Commission, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.102(b)(1), this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-750A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-750A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-750A1.txt
    • revised filing procedures. . We encourage carriers to use any and all methods they deem necessary to ensure their filings are timely received. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.301(e)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.301(e)(1), filed by Flat Rock Telephone Co-Op, Inc., IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver of section 54.301(e)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.301(e)(1), filed by Windstream Communications,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-751A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-751A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-751A1.txt
    • form is considered timely based upon the date on which USAC receives the form and not on the date of the postmark. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, the requests for refund of late filing fees for filers listed in the Appendix IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.102(b)(1), this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon E. Gillett Chief Wireline Competition
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-763A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-763A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-763A1.txt
    • 595 (1988). 47 C.F.R. �� 73.872(c)(2) and (3). The Florida Institute of Technology made, and the court rejected, a similar argument in Florida Institute. See Florida Institute, 952 F.2d at 553 (arguing that the Commission's failure to follow its own regulations engendered enough detrimental reliance to oblige the Commission to waive its Rules). 47 C.F.R. �� 0.201, 0.283 and � 1.3. See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1156-57 (D.C. Cir. 1969). Sections 73.872(c)(2) and (3) require that each party to a time-share agreement agree to any amendment in the operating hours. 47 C.F.R. � 73.872(c)(2). Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 May 3, 2010 � � � � �%���PNG �` �` b``D� 4 �&)�@�-�@�@�7 H >��O��� p j��
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-767A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-767A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-767A1.txt
    • the public interest. . We encourage carriers to use any and all methods they deem necessary to ensure their filings are timely received. ordering clauseS Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.301(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.301(b), filed by Etex Telephone Cooperative IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.102(b)(1), this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-774A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-774A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-774A1.txt
    • America). Waiver Order at 7281. Azteca Order at 10663. Waiver Order at 7281; Azteca Order at 10663. Azteca Order at 10663 (citing Waiver Order at 7281-82). Id. at 3. Id. at 8. Id. at 3. Id. at 9. Id. at 10. 5 U.S.C, � 553(b)(3)(B). The Commission may waive its rules where good cause is shown. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; Wait Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 10-774 Federal Communications Commission DA 10-774 � " � � � � F � �@ � �@ �@ �@
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-779A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-779A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-779A1.txt
    • moot inContact's request for waiver. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.204(b), 0.291, 54.720, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 54.720, and 54.722(a), that the request for review of the decision by the Universal Service Administrative Company filed by inContact, Inc. IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.204(b), 0.291, 1.3, 54.720, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 54.720, and 54.722(a), that the request for waiver IS DISMISSED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �1.102(b)(1), that this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jennifer K. McKee Acting Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-795A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-795A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-795A1.txt
    • this waiver serves the public interest, we deny MPAA's waiver request in part and grant a waiver subject to certain limitations. On balance, this limited waiver will provide public interest benefits- making movies widely available for home viewing far earlier than ever before - without imposing harm on any consumers. Public Interest Determination MPAA makes its request pursuant to Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's rules, which state, respectively, that the Commission will waive its rules ``if good cause therefore is shown,'' or if ``the public interest would be served by the grant'' of a waiver request. MPAA's waiver request raises two issues: (i) whether MPAA's proposed service offering would serve the public interest, and (ii) if so, whether waiver
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-797A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-797A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-797A1.txt
    • employer. You therefore request a waiver of this rule to permit the following Amateur licensees to transmit communications on behalf of their employer in connection with the exercise: for Kaiser Permanente Corporation, Duane Mariotti, WB9RER; for Fairview State Developmental Center, Justin Miller, KI6AFZ; for Orange County Health Care Agency, Mike Steinkraus, N6PTN; and for College Hospital, David West, KI6EPI. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the May 18-19 public safety exercise by permitting the specified amateur licensees to participate warrants this limited waiver
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-797A1_Rcd.pdf
    • an employer. You therefore request a waiver of this rule to permit the following Amateur licensees to transmit communicationson behalf of their employer in connection with the exercise: for Kaiser Permanente Corporation, Duane Mariotti, WB9RER; for Fairview State Developmental Center, Justin Miller, KI6AFZ; for Orange County Health Care Agency, Mike Steinkraus, N6PTN; and for College Hospital, David West, KI6EPI. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the May 18-19public safety exercise by permitting the specified amateur licensees to participate warrants this limited waiver of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-802A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-802A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-802A1.txt
    • 4(i), 201-203, and 254(g) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 201-203, and 254(g), and pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, that the Windstream Corporation petition for waiver IS GRANTED to the extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, that section 69.3(i)(1) of the Commission's rules IS WAIVED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon E. Gillett
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-814A1.pdf
    • most recent industrystatistics available as of the effective date of the Porting Interval Order, or by August 3, 2009. [Porting Interval Order] Waiver Providers mayapply for a waiver of the one-business dayporting interval under the Commission's rules byshowing with particularity that it would be undulyeconomically burdensome for the provider to implement the one-dayinterval, or other good cause. [47 C.F.R. � 1.3] The provider's waiver application should specifythe number of portrequests it typically receives per month and anycosts associated with complying with the reduced porting interval. Waiver requests will be considered on a case by-case basis. [Porting Interval Order] The Commission mayset the porting interval between one and four business days as individuallywarranted. However, providers that receive a waiver still must comply
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-868A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-868A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-868A1.txt
    • therefore request a waiver of this rule to permit the following Amateur licensees to transmit communications on behalf of their employer in connection with the exercise: for the Missouri Department of Public Safety, James Simmons, WA0BER; and for the Missouri State Highway Patrol, Corey Chaney, KF0U, Billy Brumble, N0VHM, Steve Groves, WD0EXG, Shannon McGowan, WD0AFP, and Dewayne Carver, WD0HXX. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the June 3 public safety exercise by permitting the specified amateur licensees to participate warrants this limited waiver
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-868A1_Rcd.pdf
    • therefore request a waiver of this rule to permit the following Amateur licensees to transmit communications on behalf of their employer in connection with the exercise: for the Missouri Department of Public Safety, James Simmons, WA0BER; and for the Missouri State Highway Patrol, Corey Chaney, KF0U, Billy Brumble, N0VHM, Steve Groves, WD0EXG, Shannon McGowan, WD0AFP, and Dewayne Carver, WD0HXX. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the June 3public safety exercise by permitting the specified amateur licensees to participate warrants this limited waiver of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-869A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-869A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-869A1.txt
    • 97.113(a)(3), prohibits amateur licensees from transmitting communications in which they have a pecuniary interest, including communications on behalf of an employer. You therefore request a waiver of this rule to permit the following Amateur licensees who are County employees to transmit communications on behalf of their employer in connection with the exercise: Gary Daigle, KB1GBD, and Maurice Rothrock, AB1KI. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the August 28-29 public safety exercise by permitting the specified amateur licensees to participate warrants this limited waiver
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-869A1_Rcd.pdf
    • 97.113(a)(3), prohibits amateur licensees from transmitting communications in which they have a pecuniary interest, including communications on behalf of an employer. You therefore request a waiver of this rule to permit the following Amateur licensees who are County employees to transmit communications on behalf of their employer in connection with the exercise: Gary Daigle, KB1GBD, and Maurice Rothrock, AB1KI. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that the Commission may waive its rules if good cause for waiver is shown. We conclude that grant of the waiver request is appropriate under the circumstances presented. The public interest in facilitating the August 28-29public safety exercise by permitting the specified amateur licensees to participate warrants this limited waiver of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-885A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-885A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-885A1.txt
    • to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. ordering clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), the Requests for Review and/or Waiver of 47 C.F.R. �54.507 filed by the Petitioners as listed in the Appendix ARE GRANTED and the applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further action consistent with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-886A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-886A1.txt
    • of the program and will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the request for waiver filed by Harvest Preparatory School on July 11, 2007, IS GRANTED and the funding requests (FRNs 1348538, 1349281, 1349304, 1349341, and 1349381) ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration consistent with this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-887A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-887A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-887A1.txt
    • and will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and authority under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the request for review filed by Expanets of North America, Englewood, Colorado, on December 24, 2002, IS GRANTED and REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-888A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-888A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-888A1.txt
    • on July 12, 2002, IS GRANTED and the application is REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that section 54.504(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.504(b), IS WAIVED to the limited extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-892A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-892A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-892A1.txt
    • Public Notice period and consideration of all comments received, the Media Bureau will consider RCN's Petition for Special Relief anew. In light of our decision to grant Montgomery County's Petition for Reconsideration and to rescind the relief granted to RCN, we dismiss Montgomery County's Petition for Stay as moot. Ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 0.61, 0.283, 1.3, and 76.605(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.61, 0.283, 1.3, 76.605(b), that Montgomery County's Petition for Reconsideration IS GRANTED. Further, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 0.61, 0.283, 1.3, and 76.605(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.61, 0.283, 1.3, 76.605(b), that the relief granted to RCN by the Media Bureau's Order, 24 FCC Rcd 12874 (MB,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-895A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-895A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-895A1.txt
    • among other things, providing access to telecommunications services to areas that were previously without such services. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and to the authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the joint petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze as codified in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Dubois Telephone Exchange, Inc. and Qwest Corporation on March 12, 2008, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-896A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-896A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-896A1.txt
    • on the totality of these circumstances, we conclude that the transfer of the Conner Creek area will serve the public interest. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the joint petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze as codified in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Eagle Telephone System, Inc. and Midvale Telephone Exchange, Incorporated on October 29, 2008, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-897A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-897A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-897A1.txt
    • safety valve support. The timing of Panora's eligibility for safety valve support is addressed in section 54.305(d)(1) of the Commission' rules. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the joint petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze as codified in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Panora Communications Cooperative and Prairie Telephone Co., Inc. on July 15, 2009, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-898A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-898A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-898A1.txt
    • be able to provide telecommunications services more efficiently than if their services were provided to smaller geographic areas within each development. ordering clauseS Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the joint petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze as codified in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by El Paso Telephone and Qwest Corporation on March 21, 2007, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-899A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-899A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-899A1.txt
    • the potential for confusion among the residents if telecommunications services to the area were to be bifurcated between two incumbent LECs. ordering clauseS Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze as codified in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Qwest Corporation on May 21, 2007, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.102(b)(1), that this
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-900A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-900A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-900A1.txt
    • and 54.314 of the Commission's rules to the extent necessary to permit Iowa Telecom to be eligible for high-cost universal service support under the non-rural mechanism. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i) and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i) and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291 and 1.3, the petition for waiver filed by Iowa Telecommunication Services, Inc. on May 8, 2006, IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.102(b)(1), that this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon E. Gillett Chief Wireline Competition
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-914A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-914A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-914A1.txt
    • is appropriate to grant the requested waiver. This Order therefore grants Fanstel's waiver request. Fanstel may therefore proceed with either TCB certification or a Self-Declaration of Conformity pursuant to Part 68 of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.141 and 0.361 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the request for waiver of section 68.317(f) for Models C5630 and C5626, filed by Fanstel Corporation, Taipei, IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: (1) the volume reset override switch shall be labeled as such and located on the telephone in such a way as to not be accessible to accidental engagement;
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-929A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-929A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-929A1.txt
    • in these cases. As a result, we deny the petitioners' appeals as listed in Appendices A, B, and C. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to the authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the appeals filed by petitioners as listed in Appendices A, B, and C ARE DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �1.102(b)(1), that this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-941A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-941A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-941A1.txt
    • the limited waiver granted here, we find that regulation pursuant to the Part 61 rules is sufficient to address any potential issues that may arise concerning the effects of the waiver on the 2010 annual filing. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 201-205 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 201-205, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, section 61.42(g) of the Commission's rules IS WAIVED for TIPToP service offered by AT&T with respect to AT&T's 2010 annual access tariff filing requirements under section 61.43 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-963A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-963A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-963A1.txt
    • beginning after call set-up and concluding after the last message call unit'' (i.e., conversation time). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority granted by sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 5, and 225 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 154(j), 155 and 225, and pursuant to the authority delegated in sections 0.141., 0.361, 1.3 and 64.604 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, 1.3 and 64.604, the Interstate TRS Fund Administrator SHALL REMIT to Sorenson by electronic funds transfer at the next regularly monthly disbursement. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Gregory Hlibok, Disability Rights Office, Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau, FCC, at (202) 559-5158 (voice or videophone),
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-999A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-999A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-999A1.txt
    • of relevant financial, management, and similar information, USAC must also comply with the DCIA, which requires the use of EFT. ordering clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), the Requests for Review and Requests for Waiver filed by the petitioners as listed in Appendices A-C ARE GRANTED and REMANDED to USAC for further consideration to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1018A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1018A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1018A1.txt
    • /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 15 1-154 and) Tj 1 0 0 1 384.95 693.649 Tm 97 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (254,) Tj 1 0 0 1 407 693.899 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (and pursuant to authority in) Tj 1 0 0 1 62.6 680.95 Tm 100 Tz (sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.106, and 54.722\(a\) of the Commission's rules,) Tj 1 0 0 1 390.95 681.2 Tm 95 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (47) Tj 1 0 0 1 405.1 681.149 Tm 104 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (C.F.R. � 0.91, 0.291, 1.3,) Tj 1 0 0 1 63.35 668.2 Tm 99 Tz (1.106, and 54.722\(a\), that the petitions for reconsideration filed by Lincoln
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1033A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1033A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1033A1.txt
    • Customers who have been displaced by the severe storms, tornados, and flooding in Missouri may desire to discontinue their service temporarily and to reinstate it at a later time. Due to the catastrophic nature of the damage in Missouri, we expect that, in many cases, these customers will seek to reinstate their service after the 90-day period has lapsed. Section 1.3 of our rules authorizes the Commission to suspend, revoke, amend, or waive a Commission rule for good cause shown. We find that in order to promote the maintenance and rebuilding of communities in disaster-ravaged areas and to facilitate continued access to telecommunications services for disaster victims, it is in the public interest to waive section 52.15(f)(ii) of the Commission's rules
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1039A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1039A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1039A1.txt
    • action consistent with this order. In remanding these funding requests to USAC, we make no finding as to the ultimate eligibility of the services requested therein. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 54.722(a), section 54.503 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.503 IS WAIVED to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1049A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1049A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1049A1.txt
    • thoroughly the detailed information provided by the parties to this proceeding. Our review of this information will enable the Commission to address issues raised by the D.C. Circuit's decision in this matter. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i) and 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), and 251(e), sections 1.3 and 52.111 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 52.111, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91 and 0.291, that the current extension of the assignment of toll free numbers 1-800-784-2433 (1-800-SUICIDE), 1-877-784-2432 (1-877-SUICIDA), and 1-888-784-2433 (1-888-SUICIDE) to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration IS
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1051A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1051A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1051A1.txt
    • 47 C.F.R. � 54.706. See Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Sixteenth Order on Reconsideration, CC Docket No. 96-45, Eighth Report and Order, CC Docket No. 96-45, Sixth Report and Order, Docket No. 96-262, 15 FCC Rcd 1679, 1687-1692, paras. 17-29 (1999) (Fifth Circuit Remand Order). Generally, the Commission's rules may be waived for good cause shown. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). In addition, the Commission may take into account considerations of hardship, equity, or more effective implementation of overall policy on an individual basis.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1083A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1083A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1083A1.txt
    • Bureau See File No. 0003304375 and attached Request for Waiver of Eligibility Restrictions from Cindy Matzel, Frequency Coordinator, AASHTO, to Federal Communications Commission (filed Jan. 28, 2008, amended Feb. 21, 2008, Feb. 29, 2008, and Apr. 9, 2008) (Amended Waiver Request). 47 C.F.R. Part 22. 47 U.S.C. � 337(c). 47 C.F.R. � 22.621. Additionally, on our own motion under Sections 1.3 and 1.925(a) of the Commission's rules, we consider waiver relief of Sections 20.9(a)(6) and 22.623(b). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925(a), 20.9(a)(6), 22.623(b). 47 C.F.R. � 1.925; Amended Waiver Request at 1. Frequency 470.1000 MHz is interleaved between existing Part 22 point-to-multipoint frequencies 470.0875 and 470.1125 MHz. See 47 C.F.R. � 22.621. Frequency 473.1000 MHz is interleaved between existing Part 22
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1084A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1084A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1084A1.txt
    • 2, 2009, April 3, 2009, Sept. 10, 2009, and Oct. 5, 2009) and associated attachments ``Request for Waiver'' filed June 18, 2007, as revised Oct. 24, 2007 (Waiver Request). 47 C.F.R. Part 22. 47 U.S.C. � 337(c). 47 C.F.R. �� 20.9(a)(6), 22.621, and 22.651. See Waiver Request at 1; 47 C.F.R. � 1.925. Additionally, on our own motion under Sections 1.3 and 1.925(a) of the Commission's rules, we consider waiver relief of Section 22.623(b). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925(a), 22.623(b). Waiver Request at 2. Pursuant to a Commission reorganization effective September 25, 2006, the relevant duties of the Public Safety and Critical Infrastructure Division of the Wireless Telecommunication Bureau were assumed by the Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau's Policy Division,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1107A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1107A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1107A1.txt
    • 53 people per square mile and Vinton County has an average of 31 people per square mile. Id. Id. Id. at 1. Zanesville Waiver Supplement at 2. Id. at 3. Id. 47 C.F.R. � 24.203(a). Id. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.946(c), 1.955(a)(2). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.946(e). See id. at � 1.946(e)(2)-(3). 47 C.F.R. � 1.925. Alternatively, pursuant to section 1.3, the Commission has authority to waive its rules if there is ``good cause'' to do so. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990). Waiver Requests at 5-6; Supplement to Waiver Requests at 2. Waiver Requests at 5-6. Supplement to Waiver Requests at 2-3. Waiver Requests at 5. Id. at 6.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1107A1_Rcd.pdf
    • the internecine litigation prevented the company from completing a sale of the Licenses in sufficient time for a buyer to timely meet the second construction deadline.36Thus, as a result 25Id.at 3. 26Id. 2747 C.F.R. � 24.203(a). 28Id. 29See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.946(c), 1.955(a)(2). 30See 47 C.F.R. �1.946(e). 31See id. at � 1.946(e)(2)-(3). 3247 C.F.R. � 1.925. Alternatively, pursuant to section 1.3, the Commission has authority to waive its rules if there is "good cause" to do so. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990). 33Waiver Requests at 5-6; Supplement to WaiverRequests at 2. 34Waiver Requests at 5-6. 35Supplement to Waiver Requests at 2-3. 36Waiver Requests at 5. 8834 Federal Communications Commission
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1122A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1122A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1122A1.txt
    • hearing loss to access digital wireless telecommunications. Where the service provider has already maximized the choice it provides those consumers, we see no benefit in limiting choice for consumers who do not use hearing aids. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.131 and 0.331 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 0.331, and sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, the request for temporary waiver of sections 20.19(c)(3) and 20.19(d)(3) filed by CTC Telcom, Inc. d/b/a Mosaic Telecom for the period September 1, 2009, through February 1, 2011, IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey S. Steinberg Deputy Chief, Spectrum and Competition Policy Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau See 47 C.F.R.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1122A1_Rcd.pdf
    • to Petition for Temporary Waiver, filed Mar. 14, 2011, at 1. 11Id. at 2. 12See47 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(3). See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969), appeal after remand, 459 F.2d 1203 (D.C. Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972); Northeast Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990); 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. 13See WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1158 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972); see also Family Stations, Inc. v. DirecTV, Inc., Order on Reconsideration,19 FCC Rcd 14777, 14780 (MB 2004). 14Rio Grande Family Radio Fellowship, Inc. v. FCC, 406 F.2d 664 (D.C. Cir. 1968). 15Seehttp://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/index.htm?job=reports_dm. 16We do not reach any conclusion as to whether it
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1125A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1125A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1125A1.txt
    • 23, 2011, OMB approved the Commission's request that an extension of the filing date for the Exclusion Reports was either not a material or was a nonsubstantive change to the approved collection, OMB Control Number: 3060-1147. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to Section 4(i) the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, THIS ORDER in PS Docket No. 07-114 is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the 90 day period for filing Exclusion Reports as specified by Sections 20.18(h)(1)(vi) and (2)(iii) of the rules IS WAIVED and that the filing date IS EXTENDED to July 28, 2011, as set forth herein. This action is
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1159A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1159A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1159A1.txt
    • access their services. We extend this waiver until July 1, 2012, or until the Commission addresses pending petitions regarding CPE portability, whichever comes first. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 151, 225, and 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 225, and 251(e), and sections 0.91, 0.141, 0.291, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.141, 0.291, 0.361, and 1.3, this ORDER IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for VRS, the waivers of the one-line VCO, VCO-to-TTY, and VCO-to-VCO; one-line HCO, HCO-to-TTY, and HCO-to-HCO; call release; pay-per-call (900) calls, types of calls, and equal access to interexchange carrier requirements are hereby extended for one year until
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1172A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1172A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1172A1.txt
    • for good cause shown.) Tj 1 0 0 1 369.1 222.75 Tm 94 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (See) Tj 1 0 0 1 385.65 222.5 Tm 97 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (47 C.F.R.) Tj 1 0 0 1 427.4 220.85 Tm 71 Tz /OPBaseFont0 10 Tf (�) Tj 1 0 0 1 435.6 222.5 Tm 98 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (1.3. The Commission may) Tj 1 0 0 1 72.2 211.199 Tm 99 Tz (exercise its discretion to waive a rule where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public) Tj 1 0 0 1 72.2 199.699 Tm 95 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (interest.) Tj 1 0 0 1 108.7 199.699 Tm 100 Tz (See Northeast Cellular Telephone Co.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1182A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1182A2.txt
    • Traffic and Revenue Report, or the Circuit Status Report on time is a violation of the Commission's rules and could result in the imposition of forfeitures or other penalties. 19. Any Filing Entity that cannot file its information by the May 1 deadline must request an extension of time to file by submitting a waiver request under provisions of section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, prior to the May 1 deadline. Requests for an extension of time shall be addressed to the Chief, International Bureau. The Filing Entity's request for an extension of time must identify the report or reports for which the entity seeks a delay, explain the reasons why the entity cannot meet the required
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1182A2_Rcd.pdf
    • Traffic and Revenue Report, or the Circuit Status Report on time is a violation of the Commission's rules and could result in the imposition of forfeitures or other penalties. 19. Any Filing Entity that cannot file its information by the May 1 deadline must request an extension of time to file by submitting a waiver request under provisions of section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, prior to the May 1 deadline. Requests for an extension of time shall be addressed to the Chief, International Bureau. The Filing Entity's request for an extension of time must identify the report or reports for which the entity seeks a delay, explain the reasons why the entity cannot meet the required
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1207A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1207A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1207A1.txt
    • the ProVision 100 at any of its installations and that the company remains committed to swiftly resolving any interference incidents that do arise. L-3 has installed approximately 300 ProVision 100 units, and it expects that the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) will make an additional procurement of the devices later this year. We are authorized to grant a waiver under Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules if the petitioner demonstrates good cause for such action. Good cause, in turn, may be found and a waiver granted ``where particular facts would make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest.'' To make this public interest determination, the waiver cannot undermine the purposes of the rule, and there must be a stronger public interest benefit
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1208A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1208A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1208A1.txt
    • 1 0 0 1 194.85 107.549 Tm 97 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (54.504\(c\).) Tj 1 0 0 1 93.6 86.199 Tm 98 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (appendix B.) Tj 1 0 0 1 79.4 64.599 Tm 95 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (See) Tj 1 0 0 1 96.2 64.599 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (appendix C; 47 C.F.R. � 1.3.) Tj ET endstream endobj 20 0 obj 7058 endobj 15 0 obj << /Dest [ 14 0 R /XYZ 0 792 null ] /Next 23 0 R /Parent 4 0 R /Prev 5 0 R /Title (page 2) >> endobj 24 0 obj << /BitsPerComponent 1 /ColorSpace /DeviceGray /DecodeParms << /Columns 2550 /K -1 >> /Filter /CCITTFaxDecode /Height 3300 /Length
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1223A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1223A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1223A1.txt
    • filing window deadline for funding years 2010-2011 because we find that the petitioners failed to present special circumstances justifying a waiver of section 54.507(c) of the Commission's rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the requests for review or requests for waiver filed by the petitioners listed in appendices A and B ARE GRANTED and their underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1231A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1231A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1231A1.txt
    • to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. U.S. Postal Service first-class, Express, and Priority mail must be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW, Washington DC 20554. . or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice), (202) 418-0432 (TTY). . By the Chief, Broadband Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau. - FCC - See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925. . 47 C.F.R. � 90.1307. See also Wireless Operations in the 3650-3700 MHz Band, ET Docket No. 04-151, WT Docket No. 05-96, Report and Order, 20 FCC Rcd 6502, 6513-14 �� 31-32 (2005) (3650 MHz Order), recon. granted in part, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 10421 (2007). 47 C.F.R. � 90.1321(a). 47 C.F.R. � 90.1331(a). 47 C.F.R.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1231A1_Rcd.pdf
    • unless the licensee(s) of the satellite earth station(s) and the 3650-3700 MHz licensee mutually agree on such operation.5Fixed and base stations also may not be located within 80 km of specified Federal Government radiolocation facilities unless such operation is successfully coordinated by the Commission with the National Telecommunications and Information Administration.6With respect to mobile and portable stations, 1See47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925. 2SeeChevron USA, Application File No. 0003602351, as amended on Jan. 5, 2011, to attach an Updated Request for Waiver (Waiver Request) (available at: http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/ApplicationSearch/results.jsp?applSearchKey=applSearchKey2011620135467. 347 C.F.R. � 90.1307. See alsoWireless Operations in the 3650-3700 MHz Band, ET Docket No. 04-151, WT Docket No. 05-96, Report and Order, 20 FCC Rcd 6502, 6513-14 �� 31-32 (2005) (3650 MHz Order), recon.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1239A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1239A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1239A1.txt
    • we find they submitted their appeals to the Commission within a reasonable period of time after receiving actual notice of USAC's adverse decision. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review and/or Requests for Waiver filed by the petitioners as listed in the appendix ARE GRANTED and the underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1240A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1240A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1240A1.txt
    • 0 1 255.1 211.949 Tm 99 Tz (Additionally, the Commission may waive any provision of its rules for) Tj 1 0 0 1 73.2 200.899 Tm 100 Tz (good cause shown. 47 C.F.R.) Tj 1 0 0 1 195.6 199.199 Tm 71 Tz /OPBaseFont0 10 Tf (�) Tj 1 0 0 1 203.75 200.899 Tm 95 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (1.3 \(2011\).) Tj 1 0 0 1 251.75 200.649 Tm 99 Tz (A list of the appeals is attached as Appendices A, B, and C.) Tj 1 0 0 1 73.65 189.399 Tm 100 Tz (Specifically, appeals filed late with USAC are listed in Appendix A. Appeals filed late with the Commission are) Tj 1 0 0 1 73.4 177.85 Tm
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1241A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1241A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1241A1.txt
    • find that they submitted their appeals to the Commission within a reasonable period of time after receiving actual notice of USAC's adverse decisions. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review and/or Requests for Waiver filed by Burlington Township School District, Holy Name of Jesus, Lakewood Cheder School, The Center for Life Enrichment, and The Potomac School ARE GRANTED and their underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1251A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1251A1.txt
    • of useful life in the EchoStar 8 satellite should lead to a different result. Furthermore, EchoStar 8 is not capable of meeting the state-of-the-art technical specifications of the proposed EchoStar-86.5W satellite. We therefore find that EchoStar did not meet the completing construction milestone for the EchoStar-86.5W satellite. Waiver Request. EchoStar alternatively seeks a waiver of the completing construction milestone. Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules provides that waiver of a rule may be granted upon ``good cause shown.'' Waiver is appropriate only if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule and such deviation would better serve the public interest than would strict adherence to the general rule. Generally, the Commission may grant a waiver of its rules in a
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1251A1_Rcd.pdf
    • additional quantum of useful life in the EchoStar 8 satellite should lead to a different result. Furthermore, EchoStar 8 is not capable of meeting the state-of-the-art technical specifications of the proposed EchoStar-86.5W satellite. We therefore find that EchoStar did not meet the completing construction milestone for the EchoStar-86.5W satellite. 9.Waiver Request.EchoStar alternatively seeks a waiver of the completing construction milestone.23Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules provides that waiver of a rule may be granted upon "good cause shown."24Waiver is appropriate only if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule and such deviation would better serve the public interest than would strict adherence to the general rule.25Generally, the Commission may grant a waiver of its rules in a particular case
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1252A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1252A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1252A1.txt
    • interfering operations, as required by the market access grant, until nearly four years after the grant. Further, there is no evidence that Spectrum Five has actually engaged in a single coordination discussion. For these reasons, we deny Spectrum Five's request for a two-year extension of the construction milestone. Waiver. Spectrum Five alternatively seeks a waiver of the construction milestone. Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules provides that waiver of a rule may be granted upon ``good cause shown.'' Good cause may be found ``where particular facts would make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest.'' To make this public interest determination, the waiver cannot undermine the purposes of the rule, and there must be a stronger public interest benefit in granting
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1252A1_Rcd.pdf
    • potentially interfering operations, as required by the market access grant, until nearly four years after the grant. Further, there is no evidence that Spectrum Five has actually engaged in a single coordination discussion. For these reasons, we deny Spectrum Five's request for a two-year extension of the construction milestone. 22.Waiver.Spectrum Five alternatively seeks a waiver of the construction milestone. Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules provides that waiver of a rule may be granted upon "good cause shown."57 Good cause may be found "where particular facts would make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest."58To make this public interest determination, the waiver cannot undermine the purposes of the rule, and there must be a stronger public interest benefit ingranting the waiver
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1332A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1332A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1332A1.txt
    • an award or a denial based on a complete review and analysis no later than 90 calendar days from release of this order. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review and/or Requests for Waiver filed by the petitioners as listed in the appendices ARE GRANTED and the underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1337A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1337A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1337A1.txt
    • mechanism. . We encourage carriers to use any and all methods they deem necessary to ensure that their filings are timely received. IV. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that this order is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver of section 54.904(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.904(d), filed by Cedar-Wapsie Communications, Inc., IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver of section 54.307(c) of the Commission's rules, 47
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-133A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-133A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-133A1.txt
    • rules and policies, under which the licensee may not convey rights to third party spectrum lessees that the licensee does not itself possess). . We also decline to address AT&T's request to reconsider two of the conditions in the SkyTerra/Harbinger Order because that request is beyond the scope of this proceeding. See AT&T Comments at 12-13. . 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972). Northeast Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1159; Northeast Cellular Tel., 897 F.2d at 1166. NetworkIP, LLC v. FCC, 548 F.3d 116, 125-28 (D.C. Cir. 2008); Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-133A1_Rcd.pdf
    • one for waiver, given that the Comment Public Noticespecifically sought comment not only on LightSquared's request for ATC modification, but also on whether to waive the requirements of the integrated service rule. As we discuss above, we conclude that the commenters had adequate notice and opportunity to comment on the issues raised by LightSquared in its request.118 10947 C.F.R. � 1.3; see alsoWAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972). 110Northeast Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). 111WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1159; Northeast Cellular Tel., 897 F.2d at 1166. 112NetworkIP, LLC v. FCC, 548 F.3d 116, 125-28 (D.C. Cir. 2008); Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1354A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1354A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1354A1.txt
    • U.S.C. �� 151-154, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.507(a)(2) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 54.507(a)(2), that this order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that section 54.507(a)(3) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.507(a)(3), IS WAIVED to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.102(b)(1), that this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon E. Gillett Chief
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1366A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1366A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1366A1.txt
    • C.F.R. � 1.102(b)(1), this order SHALL BE effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Amy E. Bender Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Totah Communications, Inc. Petition for Waiver of Commission Rule 47 CFR � 36.621(a)(4), WC Docket No. 08-71 (filed July 7, 2011) (Petition); see also 47 C.F.R. � 36.621(a)(4). Petition at 1. Id. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969); Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. NetworkIP, LLC v. FCC, 548 F.3d 116, 125-128 (D.C. Cir. 2008); Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. (continued . . .) Federal Communications Commission DA 11-1366 Federal Communications
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1368A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1368A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1368A1.txt
    • (of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 15 1-154 and) Tj 1 0 0 1 450.45 635.6 Tm 94 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (254,) Tj 1 0 0 1 472.55 635.35 Tm 98 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (and pursuant to) Tj 1 0 0 1 73.65 623.35 Tm 99 Tz (authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and) Tj 1 0 0 1 320.15 623.1 Tm 97 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (54.722\(a\)) Tj 1 0 0 1 365.5 622.85 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.) Tj 1 0 0 1 73.9 608.45 Tm 74 Tz (�) Tj 1 0 0 1 87.6 610.35 Tm 99 Tz (0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 54.722\(a\), that
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1369A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1369A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1369A1.txt
    • Tf (of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 151-154 and) Tj 1 0 0 1 450 668.95 Tm 97 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (254,) Tj 1 0 0 1 472.55 668.7 Tm 98 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (and pursuant to) Tj 1 0 0 1 74.4 656.45 Tm 99 Tz (authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722\(a\) of the Commission's rules,) Tj 1 0 0 1 486 656.2 Tm 93 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (47) Tj 1 0 0 1 500.15 655.95 Tm 96 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (C.F.R.) Tj 1 0 0 1 74.85 641.799 Tm 65 Tz (�) Tj 1 0 0 1 88.05 644 Tm 98 Tz (0.91, 0.291, 1.3,) Tj 1
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1370A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1370A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1370A1.txt
    • Tj 1 0 0 1 92.4 560.399 Tm 105 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (254) Tj 1 0 0 1 111.8 560.2 Tm 110 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to) Tj 1 0 0 1 73.65 547.5 Tm 109 Tz (authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722\(a\) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.) Tj 1 0 0 1 74.15 532.799 Tm 76 Tz (�) Tj 1 0 0 1 87.6 535 Tm 108 Tz (0.91, 0.291, 1.3,) Tj 1 0 0 1 162 535 Tm 107 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (54.722\(a\),) Tj 1 0 0 1 210 534.799 Tm 109 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (that
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1371A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1371A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1371A1.txt
    • Businesses have a responsibility to) Tj 1 0 0 1 73.9 465.399 Tm 150 Tz /OPBaseFont0 6 Tf (1747) Tj 1 0 0 1 95.25 460.849 Tm 94 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (C.F.R.) Tj 1 0 0 1 124.3 458.949 Tm 60 Tz /OPBaseFont0 11 Tf (�) Tj 1 0 0 1 132.45 460.849 Tm 86 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (1.3.) Tj 1 0 0 1 74.15 447.849 Tm 50 Tz /OPBaseFont0 10 Tf (18) Tj 1 0 0 1 82.05 443.299 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC,) Tj 1 0 0 1 255.6 443.299 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (897 F.2d 1164, 1166 \(D.C. Cir. 1990\)) Tj 1 0 0 1 409.2 443.049
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1392A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1392A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1392A1.txt
    • these reporting requirements. The BOC commenters assert that the required CEI/ONA reports no longer serve a useful purpose and unnecessarily increase their costs of providing service. To prevent the BOCs from incurring potentially unnecessary expenses, we grant, on our motion, a temporary waiver of the narrowband BOC-specific CEI and ONA reporting requirements until further Commission action on these requirements. Section 1.3 of our rules authorizes the Commission to suspend, revoke, amend, or waive a Commission rule for good cause shown. We find good cause to waive this rule, as it will allow the BOCs to avoid, or at least delay incurring the expense of preparing reports that the Commission has proposed to eliminate. Although we do not intend to prejudge the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1455A2_Rcd.pdf
    • the building. The filing hours are 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Monday through Friday.) 13847 This page intentionally left blank. 13848 Table of Contents i ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .......................................................................................................... v EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................. vi CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Background ......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2.1 Court Cases and FCC Proceedings ........................................................ 1-3 1.2.2 Draft Procedures .................................................................................... 1-4 1.3 Regulatory Framework ....................................................................................... 1-4 1.4 Proposed Action .................................................................................................. 1-6 1.5 Scope of the PEA ................................................................................................ 1-6 1.6 Public Involvement ............................................................................................. 1-7 1.6.1 Scoping Process ..................................................................................... 1-7 1.6.2 Draft PEA .............................................................................................. 1-7 1.6.3 Summary ................................................................................................ 1-8 CHAPTER TWO PURPOSE AND NEED .............................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Purpose ............................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Need .................................................................................................................... 2-1 CHAPTER THREE ALTERNATIVES ....................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 No Action Alternative .........................................................................................
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1456A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1456A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1456A1.txt
    • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Puerto Rico Cable Acquisition Corp. d/b/a ) CSR-7201-Z Choice Cable T.V. ) ) Request for Extension of Waiver Pursuant to ) Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of The Commission's Rules ) MEMORANDUM OPION AND ORDER Adopted: August 25, 2011 Released: August 25, 2011 By the Chief, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Order, we conditionally grant Puerto Rico Cable Acquisition Corp. d/b/a Choice Cable T.V.'s (``Choice'' or ``Petitioner'') unopposed request for a three-year extension of the waiver of the ban on integrated set-top boxes. As
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1457A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1457A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1457A1.txt
    • underserved rural coverage area. Thus, we conclude that continuing Petitioner's waiver of the integration ban for a limited period of six months for the Motorola DCT-700, DCT-2500, DCT-2000, DSR-410 and DSR-470 is in the public interest, and that Petitioner has met the standard for waiver under the Commission's rules. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 & 76.7, the request for waiver of Section 76.1204(a)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 76.1204(a)(1), filed by James Communications, LLC, IS GRANTED, IN PART, for six months from the date this Order is released. This action is taken pursuant to authority delegated by Section 0.283 of the Commission's
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1472A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1472A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1472A1.txt
    • is appropriate to grant the requested waiver. This Order therefore grants Xingtel's waiver request. Xingtel may therefore proceed with either TCB certification or a Self-Declaration of Conformity pursuant to Part 68 of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.141 and 0.361 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the request for waiver of section 68.317(f) for Models Amplidect350 and Amplidect350HS, filed by Xingtel Xiamen Group Co., Ltd., IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: (1) the volume reset override switch shall be labeled as such and located on the telephone in such a way as to not be accessible to
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1477A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1477A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1477A1.txt
    • 1 127.4 314.949 Tm 109 Tz (ACCORDiNGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4) Tj 1 0 0 1 73.4 302.199 Tm 110 Tz (and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 15 1-154 and 254, and sections) Tj 1 0 0 1 73.2 289.75 Tm 111 Tz (0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722\(a\) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and) Tj 1 0 0 1 483.1 289.25 Tm 107 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (54.722\(a\),) Tj 1 0 0 1 73.2 277.25 Tm 109 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (the Requests for Review filed by Cornwall-Lebanon School District, Lebanon, Pennsylvania IS) Tj 1 0 0 1 73.4 264.299 Tm
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1492A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1492A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1492A1.txt
    • a hearsay statement depends on its truthfulness, reasonableness, and credibility. Johnson v. United States, 628 F.2d 187, 190-191 (D.C. Cir. 1980). Here, we can accord little weight to Mr. Kramer's statements, because he is an executive of the company that operates Oregon's stations. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.106. Petition at 8. Petition at 9-10. 47 C.F.R. �� 0.201, 0.283 and 1.3. See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1156-57 (DC Cir. 1969) (Commission may waive any provision of its rules if it determines that good cause has been shown and that grant of the waiver does not undermine the policies set forth by the rule). Amendments of Parts 73 and 74 of the Commission's Rules to Permit Certain Minor
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1507A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1507A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1507A1.txt
    • violate a Commission rule. Therefore, we find good cause to grant the appeal and remand the underlying application to USAC for further action consistent with this order. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), the Petition for Reconsideration filed by the State of Arkansas Department of Information Systems, Little Rock, Arkansas, IS GRANTED and the application IS REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1-4 and
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1512A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1512A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1512A1.txt
    • 2011. This extension will allow the Commission to take full consideration of the record; including materials filed recently, and will help address issues raised by the D.C. Circuit's decision in this matter. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i) and 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), and 251(e), sections 1.3 and 52.111 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 52.111, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91 and 0.291, the current extension of the assignment of toll free numbers 1-800-784-2433 (1-800-SUICIDE), 1-877-784-2432 (1-877-SUICIDA), and 1-888-784-2433 (1-888-SUICIDE) to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration IS EXTENDED
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1516A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1516A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1516A1.txt
    • broadcast service. We believe it would be inconsistent with consumer expectations and thus affirmatively misleading for digital cable ready receivers not to include digital over-the-air reception capability.'' On June 7, 2011, TiVo filed a request for waiver of the Commission's tuner requirements with respect to its TiVo Premiere Elite DVR, pursuant to Section 629(c) of the Communications Act and Sections 1.3, 76.7, and 76.1207 of the Commission's rules. TiVo explained that it ``recently developed the Premiere Elite, which is an all-digital, CableCard-enabled DVR designed specifically for use in all-digital cable systems.'' Further, TiVo explained that it ``is already taking orders for a version of the Premier Elite from cable operators.'' TiVo states that it can sell the product to cable operators
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1521A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1521A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1521A1.txt
    • its non-FRED channels in place by reducing the deviation on these channels without ``material changes in system performance.'' To support its argument, Sprint references a report from Genesee's technical consultant which states that ``analog FM voice performance is unaffected by a narrower deviation.'' Although Sprint acknowledges that reduced deviation on the non-FRED channels would result in an outbound loss of 1.3 dB, it maintains that ``any loss stemming from rebanding in place that is 2 dB or less is inconsequential to coverage, or so de minimis that it is essentially noise and cannot be detected or deemed to be a change adverse enough to implicate [a] comparable facilities obligation.'' Genesee Position. Genesee claims that the 1.3 dB loss resulting from reduced
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1542A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1542A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1542A1.txt
    • procedures proposed in the Certification FNPRM). Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau Provides Guidance on Filing Requests for Waiver of New Requirements Adopted in the Video Relay Services Fraud Order, CG Docket No. 10-51, Public Notice, 26 FCC Rcd 6863 (CGB 2011) (Waiver Guidance Public Notice). See VRS Stay Order, 26 FCC Rcd at 8328, para. 3 n.6. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (``Any provision of the rules may be waived by the Commission on its own motion or on petition if good cause therefor is shown''). Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (WAIT Radio); Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. Northeast Cellular,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1543A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1543A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1543A1.txt
    • 47 C.F.R. � 54.706. See Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Sixteenth Order on Reconsideration, CC Docket No. 96-45, Eighth Report and Order, CC Docket No. 96-45, Sixth Report and Order, Docket No. 96-262, 15 FCC Rcd 1679, 1687-1692, paras. 17-29 (1999) (Fifth Circuit Remand Order). Generally, the Commission's rules may be waived for good cause shown. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). In addition, the Commission may take into account considerations of hardship, equity, or more effective implementation of overall policy on an individual basis.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1553A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1553A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1553A1.txt
    • sections 1-4 and) Tj 1 0 0 1 71 646.149 Tm 97 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (254) Tj 1 0 0 1 90.45 646.35 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority in) Tj 1 0 0 1 71 633.399 Tm 101 Tz (sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.106, and 54.722\(a\) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 0.91, 0.291, 1.3,) Tj 1 0 0 1 71.75 620.95 Tm 99 Tz (1.106, and 54.722\(a\), that the petitions for reconsideration filed by Rockwood School District, Eureka,) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.549 608.2 Tm (Missouri, and Yakutat School District, Yakutat, Alaska are DISMISSED.) Tj 1 0 0 1 251
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1554A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1554A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1554A1.txt
    • Tf (of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 151-154 and) Tj 1 0 0 1 450 497.8 Tm 95 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (254,) Tj 1 0 0 1 472.05 497.8 Tm 97 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (and pursuant to) Tj 1 0 0 1 72.95 485.349 Tm 99 Tz (authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722\(a\) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.) Tj 1 0 0 1 73.2 470.649 Tm 73 Tz (�) Tj 1 0 0 1 86.6 472.599 Tm 99 Tz (0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 54.722\(a\), that the request for review filed by Tulsa Technology Center on July 26,) Tj 1 0 0 1 72.7 460.149 Tm (2008, IS GRANTED.) Tj 1 0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1588A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1588A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1588A1.txt
    • filing window deadline for funding year 2011 because we find that the petitioners failed to present special circumstances justifying a waiver of section 54.507(c) of the Commission's rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the requests for review or requests for waiver filed by the petitioners listed in appendices A, B, and C ARE GRANTED and their underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1590A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1590A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1590A1.txt
    • shut down their operations and being denied compensation from the TRS Fund. In light of these impending deadlines for initial and recertification applications, and to avoid waste, fraud, and abuse in the VRS program, we find that good cause exists in this instance to alter the comment periods specified in Section 1.429 of the Commission's rules. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (providing for suspension, amendment, or waiver of Commission rules, in whole or in part, for good cause shown, and on the Commission's own motion). Accordingly, oppositions to Sorenson's and/or AT&T's petitions for reconsideration of the Second Report and Order shall be filed no later than 10 days after Federal Register publication, and replies to oppositions will be due no later
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1605A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1605A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1605A1.txt
    • the Benefit of Southern Oregon University, Letter, 22 FCC Rcd 17643 (MB 2007) (application pending nine years); Thomas Aquinas School, Letter, 22 FCC Rcd 15651 (MB 2007) (application pending for 12 years). See also Eagle's Nest Fellowship Church, Letter, 23 FCC Rcd 862 (MB 2008) (application pending ten years). Omnibus Order, 22 FCC Rcd at 6125. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (``WAIT Radio''); Northeast Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). WAIT Radio 418 F.2d at 1166. Id. at 1157. KBOO submitted with its Opposition a copy of its bylaws and a detailed account of which Board members were elected, appointed, removed, quit, or were
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1650A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1650A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1650A1.txt
    • interest. We therefore grant the comments in part and deny them in part, and direct the licensing staff of the Broadband Division to process the renewal applications consistent with this Memorandum Opinion and Order. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 309 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 309, and Sections 1.3 and 1.41 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.41, that the comments filed by Hughes Network Systems, LLC and DIRECTV Enterprises, LLC on July 30, 2010, August 4, 2010, August 19, 2010, January 14, 2011, and February 24, 2011 against the applications listed in the Appendix ARE GRANTED to the extent indicated above and are otherwise DENIED. IT
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1650A1_Rcd.pdf
    • n.2. 13517 Federal Communications Commission DA 11-1650 part and deny them in part, and direct the licensing staff of the Broadband Division to process the renewal applications consistent with this Memorandum Opinion and Order. 14. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 309of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 309, and Sections 1.3 and 1.41 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.41, that the comments filed by Hughes Network Systems, LLC and DIRECTV Enterprises, LLC on July 30, 2010, August 4, 2010, August 19, 2010, January 14, 2011, and February 24, 2011 against the applications listed in the Appendix ARE GRANTED to the extent indicated above and are otherwise DENIED. 15.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1656A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1656A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1656A1.txt
    • Computer Centers, Inc., Dell Marketing, LP, Nextel Communications of Mid-Atlantic, Inc., Starpower Communications, LLC, and Infosys Services, Inc., to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 54.722(a), that USAC SHALL REFUND SEED Charter School of Washington, D.C., Verizon-Washington, D.C., Inc., Avaya, Inc., America Online, CDW Computer Centers, Inc., Dell Marketing, LP, Nextel Communications of Mid-Atlantic, Inc., Starpower Communications, LLC, and Infosys Services, Inc., any funds that have already been recovered no later than 60
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1682A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1682A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1682A1.txt
    • 133.65 634.35 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.049 621.899 Tm 101 Tz (4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 151-154 and 254, and sections) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.299 609.149 Tm (0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.106 and 54.722\(a\) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.106 and) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.299 596.45 Tm 100 Tz (54.722\(a\), waiver of section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.720, IS GRANTED to) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.049 584 Tm 99 Tz (Franklin County School District, Louisburg, North Carolina.) Tj 1
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1698A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1698A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1698A1.txt
    • 0 0 1 135.8 563.799 Tm 109 Tz (ACCORDiNGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4) Tj 1 0 0 1 72.95 551.35 Tm 111 Tz (and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 151-154 and 254, and sections) Tj 1 0 0 1 72.95 538.35 Tm 110 Tz (0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and) Tj 1 0 0 1 163.65 538.6 Tm 107 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (54.722\(a\)) Tj 1 0 0 1 209 538.6 Tm 112 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and) Tj 1 0 0 1 479.25 538.6 Tm 108 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (54.722\(a\),) Tj 1 0 0 1 72.45 525.899
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1699A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1699A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1699A1.txt
    • Tf (of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 151-154 and) Tj 1 0 0 1 466.55 694.149 Tm 93 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (254,) Tj 1 0 0 1 488.15 694.149 Tm 97 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (and) Tj 1 0 0 1 72 681.399 Tm 99 Tz (pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722\(a\) of the Commission's rules, 47) Tj 1 0 0 1 72.45 668.7 Tm 100 Tz (C.F.R. � 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722\(a\), that the request for review filed by Coordinated Construction,) Tj 1 0 0 1 72.2 656 Tm 99 Tz (Inc., Los Angeles, California on June 14, 2004 IS GRANTED.) Tj 1 0 0 1 108.7 631.95
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1774A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1774A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1774A1.txt
    • dismiss its request as moot. Finally, we grant Convo's withdrawal request, and thus will not consider the portion of the Convo Waiver Request pertaining to section 64.604(a)(7). ordering clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 2, 4 and 225 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 152, 154 and 225, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.141 and 0.361 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141 and 0.361, the request for temporary waiver filed by Convo Communications, LLC of section 64.604(c)(5)(iii)(N)(1)(i-ii) of the Commission's rules IS GRANTED to the extent discussed above. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the request for
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1791A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1791A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1791A1.txt
    • Review filed by Covert Public School District, Covert, Michigan, IS GRANTED and the underlying application IS REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that section 54.507(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.507(d) IS WAIVED to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a)
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1835A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1835A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1835A1.txt
    • /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (The Commission may waive any provision of its) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 381.149 Tm 101 Tz (rules on its own motion and for good cause shown. 47 C.F.R.) Tj 1 0 0 1 321.35 379.25 Tm 72 Tz /OPBaseFont0 10 Tf (�) Tj 1 0 0 1 329.5 380.899 Tm 88 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (1.3.) Tj 1 0 0 1 348.45 380.899 Tm 99 Tz (A rule may be waived where the particular) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 369.599 Tm (facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest.) Tj 1 0 0 1 336.45 369.399 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC,) Tj 1 0 0 1 510.95
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1840A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1840A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1840A1.txt
    • in sections 1-4 and) Tj 1 0 0 1 67.9 662.45 Tm 97 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (254) Tj 1 0 0 1 87.35 662.2 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 15 1-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority in) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.15 649.95 Tm (sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.106, and) Tj 1 0 0 1 230.15 649.75 Tm 98 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (54.722\(a\)) Tj 1 0 0 1 275.75 649.7 Tm 102 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 0.91, 0.291, 1.3,) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.6 637 Tm 99 Tz (1.106, and 54.722\(a\), that the petition for reconsideration filed by Coatesvifle
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1854A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1854A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1854A1.txt
    • 11 Tf (ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1-4 and) Tj 1 0 0 1 62.6 432.75 Tm 101 Tz (254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 151-154 and 254, and the authority) Tj 1 0 0 1 62.6 420.299 Tm 100 Tz (delegated pursuant to authority in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and) Tj 1 0 0 1 346.3 419.799 Tm 97 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (54.722\(a\)) Tj 1 0 0 1 391.4 419.549 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (of the Commission's rules, 47) Tj 1 0 0 1 62.6 407.549 Tm 98 Tz (C.F.R. � � 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and) Tj 1 0 0 1 202.05 407.349 Tm 97 Tz
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1868A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1868A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1868A1.txt
    • on November 15. We therefore conclude that Gallaudet has not met its burden of showing that good cause exists for further extension of the stay. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 2, 4 and 225 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 152, 154 and 225, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.141 and 0.361 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141 and 0.361, the Motion to Extend Stay filed by Gallaudet University IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Joel Gurin Chief, Consumer and Governmental
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1875A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1875A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1875A1.txt
    • enable the Commission to review the detailed information provided by the parties....'' We agree with the parties and find that good cause exists to extend the current assignment until December 30, 2011. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i) and 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), and 251(e), sections 1.3 and 52.111 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 52.111, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91 and 0.291, the current assignment of toll free numbers 1-800-784-2433 (1-800-SUICIDE), 1-877-784-2432 (1-877-SUICIDA), and 1-888-784-2433 (1-888-SUICIDE) to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration IS EXTENDED to December 30,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1901A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1901A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1901A1.txt
    • J. Bahar, Vice President of Government and Regulatory Affairs, Convo, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC (filed Nov. 8, 2011), at 1 (describing steps required to transition from VRS subcontractor to stand-alone VRS provider, and asserting that it will take Convo between two weeks and one month to commence independent VRS operations). 47 C.F.R. � 64.604(c)(5)(iii)(N)(1)(iii). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (Commission may waive its rules on its own motion if good cause therefor is shown). This transition period is consistent with the Commission's objective to provide subcontractors to eligible VRS providers with ``the opportunity to apply for certification prior to the expiration of the stay and...the opportunity to seek to transition to eligibility in a seamless manner, without any interruption
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1902A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1902A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1902A1.txt
    • Vice President of Government and Regulatory Affairs, Convo Communications, LLC, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC (filed Nov. 8, 2011), at 1 (describing steps required to transition from VRS subcontractor to stand-alone VRS provider, and asserting that it will take Convo between two weeks and one month to commence independent VRS operations). 47 C.F.R. � 64.604(c)(5)(iii)(N)(1)(iii). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (Commission may waive its rules on its own motion if good cause therefor is shown). This transition period is consistent with the Commission's objective to provide subcontractors to eligible VRS providers with ``the opportunity to apply for certification prior to the expiration of the stay and...the opportunity to seek to transition to eligibility in a seamless manner, without any interruption
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1903A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1903A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1903A1.txt
    • Vice President of Government and Regulatory Affairs, Convo Communications, LLC, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC (filed Nov. 8, 2011), at 1 (describing steps required to transition from VRS subcontractor to stand-alone VRS provider, and asserting that it will take Convo between two weeks and one month to commence independent VRS operations). 47 C.F.R. � 64.604(c)(5)(iii)(N)(1)(iii). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (Commission may waive its rules on its own motion if good cause therefor is shown). This transition period is consistent with the Commission's objective to provide subcontractors to eligible VRS providers with ``the opportunity to apply for certification prior to the expiration of the stay and...the opportunity to seek to transition to eligibility in a seamless manner, without any interruption
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-192A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-192A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-192A1.txt
    • as an equivalent technique to FDTD. ANSYS asserts no presumption in favor of FDTD's scientific acceptance should be permitted because both FDTD and FEM are still under review by the Technical Committee 34, and neither is currently recognized fully by an IEEE Standard though both are currently under consideration. ANSYS asserts that the literature provided supports a request under Section 1.3 of Commission rules for waiver of Section 1.1307(b)(2) to allow parties to employ FEM-based approaches. ANSYS asserts that its request for waiver is consistent with the requirements of Section 1.925(b)(3), which establishes the basis for evaluating requests for waiver in that (1) the underlying purpose of Section 1.1307(b)(2) would not be served by excluding FEM-based methods and granting the request
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1951A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1951A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1951A1.txt
    • would be consistent with the previously established EnteroMedics precedent wherein the Commission waived Section 15.209 to allow an implanted device used to treat gastro-intestinal disorders to operate at field strengths up to 200.2 �V/m at 30 meters for transmission of both power and communications signals at a frequency of 6.78 MHz. We are authorized to grant a waiver under Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules if the petitioner demonstrates good cause for such action. Good cause, in turn, may be found and a waiver granted ``where particular facts would make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest.'' To make this public interest determination, the waiver cannot undermine the purposes of the rule, and there must be a stronger public interest benefit
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1957A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1957A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1957A1.txt
    • its petition. . We encourage carriers to use any and all methods they deem necessary to ensure that their filings are timely received. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that this order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver of sections 54.307(c) and 54.802(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.307(c) and �54.802(a), filed by Washington RSA No. 8 Limited Partnership; Eastern Sub-RSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Inland Cellular, IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1974A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1974A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1974A1.txt
    • Tm 99 Tz (and) Tj 1 0 0 1 90.95 672.049 Tm 97 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (254) Tj 1 0 0 1 110.4 671.549 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 15 1-154 and 254, and sections) Tj 1 0 0 1 72 659.1 Tm 102 Tz (0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722\(a\) of the Commission's rules, 47 c.F.R. � 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722\(a\),) Tj 1 0 0 1 71.5 646.6 Tm 100 Tz (that waivers of section) Tj 1 0 0 1 174.7 646.35 Tm 97 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (54.503\(c\)) Tj 1 0 0 1 220.05 646.35 Tm 101 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (of the Commission's rules, 47
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1979A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1979A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1979A1.txt
    • this funding request to Katy or its service provider, Phonoscope, USAC shall institute or continue recovery actions against them. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES 10. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 54.722(a), that the request for review filed by Katy Independent School District on July 23, 2009, IS DENIED. 11. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1991A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1991A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1991A1.txt
    • the guidance provided herein beginning with FCC Forms 470 or requests for proposals that are posted for Funding Year 2013. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 54.722(a), that the request for review filed by the Queen of Peace High School on July 19, 2010, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2010A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2010A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2010A1.txt
    • instant case, and that a grant of the waiver would be in the public interest; or (ii) [i]n view of unique or unusual factual circumstances of the instant case, application of the rule(s) would be inequitable, unduly burdensome or contrary to the public interest, or the applicant has no reasonable alternative.'' 47 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(3)(i)-(ii); see also 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (providing that any rule provision ``may be waived by the Commission on its own motion or on petition if good cause thereof is shown''). See Letter, dated Oct. 13, 2011, from Joseph Hersey, Jr., Chief, Spectrum Management and Telecommunications Policy Division, United States Coast Guard, to Scot Stone, Deputy Chief, Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau. This action does not change
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2010A1_Rcd.pdf
    • Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at (202) 418-0680, TTY (202) 418-7233, or via email to Ghassan.Khalek@fcc.govor Jeff.Tobias@fcc.gov. Action by the Deputy Chief, Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau. -FCC- circumstances of the instant case, application of the rule(s) would be inequitable, unduly burdensome or contrary to the public interest, or the applicant has no reasonable alternative." 47 C.F.R. �1.925(b)(3)(i)-(ii); see also47 C.F.R. �1.3 (providing that any rule provision "may be waived by the Commission on its own motion or on petition if good cause thereof is shown"). 7SeeLetter, dated Oct. 13, 2011, from Joseph Hersey, Jr., Chief, Spectrum Management and Telecommunications Policy Division, United States Coast Guard, to Scot Stone, Deputy Chief, Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau. 8This action does not change or
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2020A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2020A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2020A1.txt
    • 47 C.F.R. � 54.706. See Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Sixteenth Order on Reconsideration, CC Docket No. 96-45, Eighth Report and Order, CC Docket No. 96-45, Sixth Report and Order, Docket No. 96-262, 15 FCC Rcd 1679, 1687-1692, paras. 17-29 (1999) (Fifth Circuit Remand Order). Generally, the Commission's rules may be waived for good cause shown. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). In addition, the Commission may take into account considerations of hardship, equity, or more effective implementation of overall policy on an individual basis.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2039A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2039A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2039A1.txt
    • 7281; Azteca Order at 10663. Estrella Order at 4726 (citing Azteca Order at 10663). Petition at 9, 4. Id. at 10, citing Declaration of Luis Calle, Mambo, LLC Vice-President of Operations. Id. Id at9. Id. at 9. Id. at 12, 4. 5 U.S.C, � 553(b)(3)(B). The Commission may waive its rules where good cause is shown. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; Wait Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 11-2039 Federal Communications Commission DA 11-2039 x y � � F y �t�
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2040A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2040A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2040A1.txt
    • notice of USAC's adverse decision, or the late-filed appeal would never have been necessary absent an error on the part of USAC. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), the Requests for Review and/or Requests for Waiver filed by the petitioners as listed in the Appendix ARE GRANTED and REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2041A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2041A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2041A1.txt
    • at 7281. Azteca Order at 10663. Estrella Order at 2. Waiver Order at 7281; Azteca Order at 10663. Estrella Order at 2 (citing Azteca Order at 10663). Id. at 5. Id. at 8. Id at.8-9. Id. at 9. Id. at 10. 5 U.S.C, � 553(b)(3)(B). The Commission may waive its rules where good cause is shown. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; Wait Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 11-2041 Federal Communications Commission DA 11-2041 ? @ � F �
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2058A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2058A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2058A1.txt
    • whether any of these figures are de minimis under Commission policy and would thus not trigger FM Priorities (1) or (2) for purposes of comparison with other mutually exclusive proposals. 8. A staff engineering analysis has determined that Channel 287C2 can be allotted to Williams, in conformity with the Commission's Rules, provided there is a site restriction of 2.1 kilometers (1.3 miles) northeast at reference coordinates 35-15-57 NL and 112-10-47 WL. Channel 228C2 can be allotted at Ehrenberg at a site 18.8 kilometers (17.9 miles) northeast of the community at coordinates 33-48-00 NL and 114-19-12 WL. Channel 281C can be allotted at First Mesa at a site 16.8 kilometers (105 miles) south of the community at coordinates 35-41-09 NL and 110-21-43
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2063A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2063A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2063A1.txt
    • extend the page limits applicable to petitions for reconsideration and oppositions to petitions for reconsideration of the Commission's USF/ICC Transformation Order to 40 pages and extend the page limit to 15 pages for consolidated replies. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 303(r), and Sections 1.3, 1.429(d), (f) and (g) of the Commission's Rules, 47 CFR �� 1.3, 1.429(d), (f), and (g), that the Joint Motion filed by the Rural Representatives on December 20, 2011 is PARTIALLY GRANTED and the limit applicable to all parties filing petitions for reconsideration of the Commission's USF/ICC Transformation Order IS HEREBY EXTENDED to 40 pages; the limit applicable to all
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2063A1_Rcd.pdf
    • extend the page limits applicable to petitions for reconsideration and oppositions to petitions for reconsideration of the Commission's USF/ICC Transformation Orderto 40 pages and extend the page limit to 15 pages for consolidated replies. 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 303(r), and Sections 1.3, 1.429(d), (f) and (g) of the Commission's Rules, 47 CFR �� 1.3, 1.429(d), (f), and (g), that theJoint Motion filed by the Rural Representatives on December 20, 2011 is PARTIALLY GRANTED and the limit applicable to all parties filing petitions for reconsideration of the Commission's USF/ICC Transformation OrderIS HEREBY EXTENDED to 40 pages; the limit applicable to all parties filing
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2070A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2070A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2070A1.txt
    • numerous legal and factual issues raised in this proceeding, we find that good cause exists to further extend the current assignment until the Commission can review the detailed information from the parties. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i) and 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), and 251(e), sections 1.3 and 52.111 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 52.111, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91 and 0.291, the current assignment of toll free numbers 1-800-784-2433 (1-800-SUICIDE), 1-877-784-2432 (1-877-SUICIDA), and 1-888-784-2433 (1-888-SUICIDE) to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration IS EXTENDED to February 28,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-211A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-211A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-211A1.txt
    • a six-month extension will allow the Commission to consider the record in response to our iTRS Toll Free NPRM. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 225, and 251(e), of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 154(j), 225, and 251(e), and sections 0.91, 0.141, 0.291, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.141, 0.291, 0.361, 1.3, that this Order IS ADOPTED, and that the Commission's requirement that toll free numbers and ten-digit geographic numbers not be directed to the same URI in the iTRS Directory is waived until August 4, 2011. or call the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau . FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Joel
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-215A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-215A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-215A1.txt
    • the action we take today for any period prior to the effective date of this order. ordering clauseS Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and to the authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the joint petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze as codified in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Beaver Creek Cooperative Telephone Company and Qwest Corporation on June 29, 2007, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1)
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-240A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-240A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-240A1.txt
    • 97-11; AAD File No. 98-43, Report and Order and Second Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 11364, 11372-75, paras. 12-16 (1999) (granting blanket section 214 authority for new lines of all domestic carriers including dominant carriers). The Commission has discretion to waive its rules on its own motion at any time ``for good cause shown.'' See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See Northeast Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106, 1.115. Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 � �%���PNG �` �` b``D� 4 �&)�@�-�@�@�7 H >��O��� p j�� �2�=��k��� �"_� - J��, �Nt�Rb �7�P���U�ZS '��wp��ˈ jP�T{.|�87w]�g��yA�Ҩ-��=T#�O> �#W p����U�^S� �t�''�TxNt�l ۦ��X6`T{������:�r�� �A�R\ )]h]e�M8�I̟`�?K^��� ?C��A�UU �3ꡟ=��A � \�+�_ �e�P�g� �ك�� �_ą {�.� �"��{Z��HV9�iъ���� s+
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-269A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-269A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-269A1.txt
    • required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the rules. . Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 225, and 251(e), of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 154(j), 225, and 251(e), and sections 0.91, 0.141, 0.291, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.141, 0.291, 0.361, 1.3, that this Order IS ADOPTED, and that comments in this proceeding are now due on February 28, 2011, and replies are due on March 7, 2011. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i) and 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. ��
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-284A1.txt
    • 0.3 3.5 0.2 0.5 0.0 13.7 0.5 Second operator subgroup (incumbents) 70 31.1 0.7 14.5 0.3 3.7 0.2 0.5 0.1 12.5 0.5 Second operator subgroup (rivals) 70 36.5 1.8 13.9 0.5 2.6 0.2 0.4 0.1 19.6 1.5 DBS subgroup 208 30.6 0.7 14.6 0.3 3.4 0.1 1.0 0.1 11.6 0.5 Wireless MVPD subgroup 31 30.6 0.6 15.5 0.2 2.7 0.1 1.3 0.1 11.2 0.4 Low penetration test subgroup 34 26.8 1.9 13.3 0.8 1.4 0.2 0.5 0.1 11.7 1.7 Source: 2009 survey. Attachment 10 Expanded Basic Channels Sample Group Video Programming Service January 1, 2009 January 1, 2008 N Mean Std. Error N Mean Std. Error Sample groups overall Basic service 762 29.5 0.5 738 29.1 0.6 Cable programming 762 48.7
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-301A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-301A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-301A1.txt
    • the Chester Upland School District, and the Hartford Public Schools, ARE GRANTED and REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that sections 54.504(d) and 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 54.504(c)(1)(iii) and 54.720, ARE WAIVED as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-303A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-303A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-303A1.txt
    • waive any associated invoice filing deadlines in connection with this service deadline extension and any other procedural deadlines that were missed while these issues were on appeal with the Commission. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the appeals filed by Blitz Communications, Inc., Chicago, Illinois; Brevard County School District, Viera, Florida; Highland Park School District, Highland Park, Michigan; Jackson Public School District, Jackson, Mississippi; and Many Farms High School, Many Farms, Arizona, ARE GRANTED and the underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-322A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-322A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-322A1.txt
    • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 11-322 Released: February 18, 2011 WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU SEEKS COMMENT ON NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK) REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF CERTAIN PART 80 AUTOMATED MARITIME TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM (AMTS) RULES TO IMPLEMENT POSITIVE TRAIN CONTROL (PTC) WT Docket No. 11-27 Comment Date: March 11, 2011 Reply Date: March 21, 2011 Pursuant to sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (Bureau) seeks comment on a request for waiver filed by National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) on January 3, 2011, regarding certain Part 80 Automated Maritime Telecommunications System (AMTS) rules to implement its planned Advanced Civil Speed Enforcement System (ACSES), a ``positive train control'' (PTC) system in the AMTS bands (217-218
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-322A1_Rcd.pdf
    • 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 DA 11-322 Released: February 18, 2011 WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU SEEKS COMMENT ON NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK) REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF CERTAIN PART 80 AUTOMATED MARITIME TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM (AMTS) RULES TO IMPLEMENT POSITIVE TRAIN CONTROL (PTC) WT Docket No. 11-27 Comment Date: March 11, 2011 Reply Date: March 21, 2011 Pursuant to sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules,1the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (Bureau) seeks comment on a request for waiver filed by National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) on January 3, 2011, regarding certain Part 80 Automated Maritime Telecommunications System2(AMTS) rules to implement its planned Advanced Civil Speed Enforcement System (ACSES), a "positive train control" (PTC) system in the AMTS bands (217-218 MHz and
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-355A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-355A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-355A1.txt
    • where they will become available on a first-come, first-served basis to any subscriber, including EPS, via a RespOrg request. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 225, and 251(e), of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 154(j), 225, and 251(e), and sections 0.91, 0.141, 0.291, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.141, 0.291, 0.361, 1.3, that this Declaratory Ruling IS ADOPTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon E. Gillett Chief Wireline Competition Bureau Transaction Network Services, Inc., TSYS Acquiring Solutions, LLC, and Electronic Payment Systems, LLC, Regarding FCC Jurisdiction and RespOrg Responsibilities to Comply with Part 52 of the FCC's Rules and the SMS/800 Tariff
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-359A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-359A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-359A1.txt
    • grandfathered public safety incumbents. This additional time should allow the affected VPCSA licensees to make appropriate arrangements across their networks and ensure a smooth transition both in areas where Channels 84 and 85 are immediately available and elsewhere. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that Section 2.106 note US228 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.106 n.US228, and Section 80.371(c)(1)(i) note 3 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 80.371(c)(1)(i) n.3, ARE WAIVED to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. These actions are taken under delegated authority pursuant
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-359A1_Rcd.pdf
    • 10 dB protection to their predicted 38 dBu signal level contour in accordance with co-channel interference protection standard in Section 80.773(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 80.773(b). See Second Report and Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 13725 n.97. 10The Commission may waive any provision of its rules on its own motion for good cause shown. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. A rule may be waived where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). In addition, the Commission may take into account considerations of hardship, equity, or more effective implementation of overall policy on an individual basis. WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-360A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-360A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-360A1.txt
    • radio sites with the post-consolidation frequencies, resulting in a better coordinated rebanding effort, reduced costs to the FCC and Verizon, and will free up the pre-consolidation spectrum.'' In our September 7 Interim Relief Grant, we noted that a further request for extension of time and STA may be warranted. Upon review of the instant Renewal Request, and pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and on our own motion, we find that extension of waiver relief and STA is consistent with the public interest. Specifically, we find that grant of additional time will enable ORION to reband the majority of the system subscribers and infrastructure at all 14 ORION radio sites with the post-consolidation frequencies. While
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-362A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-362A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-362A1.txt
    • is appropriate to grant the requested waiver. This Order therefore grants GTC's waiver request. GTC may therefore proceed with either TCB certification or a Self-Declaration of Conformity pursuant to Part 68 of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.141 and 0.361 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the request for waiver of section 68.317(f) for Models VL4834PER1, LL4824HER1, VG4831PER0, LG4821HER1, PowerTel 680, PowerTel 580 combo, PowerTel 601, and PowerTel 501, filed by Global China Technology Limited, IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: (1) the volume reset override switch shall be labeled as such and located on the telephone
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-363A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-363A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-363A1.txt
    • is appropriate to grant the requested waiver. This Order therefore grants GTC's waiver request. GTC may therefore proceed with either TCB certification or a Self-Declaration of Conformity pursuant to Part 68 of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.141 and 0.361 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the request for waiver of section 68.317(f) for Models LL4822HER1, LL4822HER2, LG4821HER1, PowerTel 580 and PowerTel 501, filed by Global China Technology Limited, IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: (1) the volume reset override switch shall be labeled as such and located on the telephone in such a way as to
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-364A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-364A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-364A1.txt
    • is appropriate to grant the requested waiver. This Order therefore grants GTC's waiver request. GTC may therefore proceed with either TCB certification or a Self-Declaration of Conformity pursuant to Part 68 of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.141 and 0.361 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the request for waiver of section 68.317(f) for Models GL4823HER0. GL4820HER0, PowerTel 58, and PowerTel 57, filed by Global China Technology Limited, IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: (1) the volume reset override switch shall be labeled as such and located on the telephone in such a way as to not
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-366A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-366A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-366A1.txt
    • is appropriate to grant the requested waiver. This Order therefore grants CCT's waiver request. CCT may therefore proceed with either TCB certification or a Self-Declaration of Conformity pursuant to Part 68 of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.141 and 0.361 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the request for waiver of section 68.317(f) for Models 30233SE1 and 30234SE1, filed by CCT Tech USA, Inc., IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: (1) the volume reset override switch shall be labeled as such and located on the telephone in such a way as to not be accessible to accidental
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-42A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-42A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-42A1.txt
    • the problem. . We encourage carriers to use any and all methods they deem necessary to ensure that their filings are timely received. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that this order is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver of section 54.307(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.307(c), filed by Dixie Net Communications, Inc. IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-42A1_Rcd.pdf
    • calculate second quarter support for the following calendar year. 6Id. 7Petition at 1; 47 C.F.R. � 54.307(c). 8Petition at 3-4. 9Id.at 4. 10Id. 11Id. 12SeeComment Sought on the Dixie Net Communications, Inc. Petition For Waiver of a Universal Service High- Cost Filing Deadline, WC Docket No. 08-71, Public Notice, 25 FCC Rcd 13054 (Wireline Comp. Bur. 2010). 1347 C.F.R. � 1.3. 14Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). 15WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969); Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. 16NetworkIP,LLC v. FCC, 548 F.3d 116, 125-128 (D.C. Cir. 2008); Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. 185 Federal Communications Commission DA 11-42 6.USAC processes a tremendous amount of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-437A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-437A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-437A1.txt
    • supplement at 1-2. As part of this waiver, Intelsat requests that we delete Special Provision 5803 from the above-captioned Hagerstown earth-station licenses, which limits operations in the 3650-3700 MHz band to a secondary basis. See SES-MOD-20090609-00714 November 15, 2010 Statement. Public Notice, Satellite Communications Services: Satellite Radio Applications Accepted for Filing, Report No. SES-01184 (October 21, 2009). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969); Dominion Video Satellite, Inc., Order and Authorization, 14 FCC Rcd 8182 (Int'l Bur. 1999). , supra. , supra. See February 4, 2011 supplement. While Intelsat occasionally uses the term ``exclusion zones'' to refer to these areas; we read
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-437A1_Rcd.pdf
    • the fixed-satellite service (space-to-Earth) in the band 3650-3700 MHz to grandfathered earth stations.19Based on this record, Intelsat has established that moving the stations from Clarksburg to Hagerstown is being forced by factors outside its 13See SES-MOD-20090609-00714 November 15, 2010 Statement. 14Public Notice, Satellite Communications Services: Satellite Radio Applications Accepted for Filing, Report No. SES-01184 (October 21, 2009). 1547 C.F.R. � 1.3. 16Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). 17WAITRadio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969); Dominion Video Satellite, Inc., Order and Authorization, 14 FCC Rcd 8182 (Int'l Bur. 1999). 18See, e.g., paragraph 3, supra. 19Seefootnote 2, supra. 3461 Federal Communications Commission DA 11-437 control (i.e., the loss of the lease at Clarksburg).20As such, we
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-447A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-447A3.txt
    • mobile service for certain aeronautical applications NOC RES 420 (WRC-07) Consideration of the frequency bands between 5 000 and 5 030 MHz for aeronautical mobile (R) service surface applications at airports SUP Consequential suppression. 1.4 ATTACHMENT 17 RESOLUTION FCC NTIA Comments WRC-12 Agenda Item RES 421 (WRC-07) Consideration of appropriate regulatory provisions for the operation of unmanned aircraft systems NOC 1.3 RES 506 (Rev.WRC-97) Use by space stations in the broadcasting-satellite service operating in the 12 GHz frequency bands allocated to the broadcasting-satellite service of the geostationary-satellite orbit and no other NOC RES 507 (Rev.WRC-03) Establishment of agreements and associated plans for the broadcasting-satellite service NOC RES 517 (Rev.WRC-07) Introduction of digitally modulated emissions in the high-frequency bands between 3 200
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-447A3_Rcd.pdf
    • 5 030 M Hz f or ae rona utical mobile (R) se rvice surface a pplications at airports SUP Conse quential suppression. 1.4 3607 ATTACH MENT RESOL UTIO N FCC NTIA Com ments WRC-12Age nda Item RES 421 (WRC-07) Consi deration of appropriate re gulatory provisions f or t he ope ration of unm anned ai rcraft syste ms NOC 1.3 RES 506 (Rev.WRC-97) Use by s pac e stations i n th e broa dcasting-satellite service ope rating in the 12 GHz frequency bands allocated to the broadcasti ng-satellite service of the geostationary-satellite orbit and no othe r NOC RES 507 (Rev.WRC-03) Establishm ent of a greem ents and associated plans for t he broa dcasting-satellite service NOC RES 517
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-454A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-454A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-454A1.txt
    • than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the rules. . Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i) and 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), and 251(e), sections 1.3 and 52.111 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 52.111, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91 and 0.291, that authority is delegated to the North American Numbering Council as set forth above. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 251(e) and 408 of the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-461A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-461A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-461A1.txt
    • frost, but they cease functioning at extremely cold temperatures and the RFID tags cannot tolerate the gamma radiation used to sterilize containers. Bluechiip states that its technology produces a virtually indestructible ``license plate'' which has been field proven to survive autoclaving and gamma radiation sterilization, humidification, centrifugation and cryogenic storage. Discussion We are authorized to grant a waiver under Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules if the petitioner demonstrates good cause for such action. Good cause, in turn, may be found and a waiver granted ``where particular facts would make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest.'' To make this public interest determination, the waiver cannot undermine the purposes of the rule, and there must be a stronger public interest benefit
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-464A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-464A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-464A1.txt
    • is appropriate to grant the requested waiver. This Order therefore grants Geemarc's waiver request. Geemarc may therefore proceed with either TCB certification or a Self-Declaration of Conformity pursuant to Part 68 of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.141 and 0.361 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the request for waiver of section 68.317(f) for Models Ampli100VM and Dallas100VM filed by Geemarc Telecom International Ltd, IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: (1) the volume reset override switch shall be labeled as such and located on the telephone in such a way as to not be accessible to accidental
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-473A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-473A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-473A1.txt
    • 47 C.F.R. � 54.706. See Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Sixteenth Order on Reconsideration, CC Docket No. 96-45, Eighth Report and Order, CC Docket No. 96-45, Sixth Report and Order, Docket No. 96-262, 15 FCC Rcd 1679, 1687-1692, paras. 17-29 (1999) (Fifth Circuit Remand Order). Generally, the Commission's rules may be waived for good cause shown. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). In addition, the Commission may take into account considerations of hardship, equity, or more effective implementation of overall policy on an individual basis.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-504A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-504A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-504A1.txt
    • the S-R Broadcasting Application , which encompassed not only the infrastructure needed for KRKO(AM) but also the infrastructure needed for another AM station tower at the site.}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs22 \ltrch\fcs0 \cs23\fs22\super \chftn {\footnote \ltrpar \pard\plain \ltrpar \s21\ql \li0\ri0\sa120\widctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\ rin0\lin0\itap0 \rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs20\alang1025 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \cs23\super \chftn }{ \rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \i Id.}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 at Sections 1.3 & 3.1.4. The EA explains that \'93 [t]he cumulative impacts of both proposals were environmentally reviewed since the potential for a project similar to the CAAM project but larger in scope was known at the time the environmental review was conducted for KRKO-AM.\'94 }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \i Id.}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 at Section 3.1.4.}}}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs22 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs22 In particular, the EA
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-533A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-533A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-533A1.txt
    • Albany's appeal was filed late, the district filed the appeal as soon they received actual notice of the denial. Lincoln County's appeal was only two days late. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the Requests for Review and/or Request for Waiver filed by the petitioners as listed in the appendices ARE GRANTED and the applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHERED ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-54A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-54A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-54A1.txt
    • that it require each of its Lifeline customers to annually self-certify that they are the head of their household and receive Lifeline-supported service only from TracFone. ordering clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91 and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91 and 1.3, that the petition for modification filed by TracFone Wireless, Inc. IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 408 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 408, this Order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon Gillett Chief Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-560A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-560A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-560A1.txt
    • filing procedures. . We encourage carriers to use any and all methods they deem necessary to ensure that their filings are timely received. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that this order is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver of section 54.802(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.802(a), filed by F&B Communications, Inc. f/k/a Farmers' and Business Men's Telephone Company IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-561A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-561A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-561A1.txt
    • filing procedures. . We encourage carriers to use any and all methods they deem necessary to ensure that their filings are timely received. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that this order is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver of section 54.307(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.307(c), filed by Ringsted Communications Company IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.102(b)(1),
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-562A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-562A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-562A1.txt
    • proof of service upon the party or parties filing the statement or statements to which the reply is directed . . . .'' Given that all comments will be posted to the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System, we hereby waive the requirement that parties be served hard copies of the comments and reply comments in this proceeding, pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commissions rules. Interested parties may file comments on or before April 27, 2011 and reply comments on or before May 12, 2011. All filings must reference RM-11626. In order to be considered part of the official record, comments must be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3)
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-566A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-566A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-566A1.txt
    • has failed to show good cause to waive the deadline associated with the FCC Form 499-A, and accordingly we deny its requested waiver, consistent with precedent. ACCORDINGLY IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154, 254, and pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 54.722(a), that the request filed by Manitowoc on October 1, 2010 IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this order SHALL BE transmitted to the Universal Service Administrative Company. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.102(b)(1), this order
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-569A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-569A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-569A1.txt
    • ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4 (i) and (j), 201-209, of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), (j), 201-209, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, this order IS HEREBY ADOPTED as described above. 14. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commissions rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, section 61.49(k) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 61.49(k), IS WAIVED for the purpose specified in paragraph 4 supra. 15. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-599A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-599A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-599A1.txt
    • � 54.507(d); supra para. 2. In this situation, recipients like Twiggs County could have applied for the same recurring maintenance services for the following funding year instead of requesting an extension of the service delivery deadline. See Twiggs County Request for Review; ACS Request for Review. Generally, the Commission's rules may be waived for good cause shown. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular); see also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (WAIT Radio), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972). In addition,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-59A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-59A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-59A1.txt
    • underlying application and issue a decision based on a complete review and analysis no later than 60 calendar days from the release date of this order. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the request for review filed by Warren Village School on March 18, 2004, IS GRANTED and the application is REMANDED to USAC for further consideration consistent with this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-605A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-605A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-605A1.txt
    • deadline for funding years 2009 and 2010 because we find that the petitioners failed to present special circumstances justifying a waiver of section 54.507(c) of the Commission's rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the requests for review or requests for waiver filed by the petitioners listed in appendix A ARE GRANTED and their underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-606A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-606A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-606A1.txt
    • 54.504(c) of the Commission's rules, which requires that applications must be complete when filed, to enable these petitioners to correct any SPIN errors on their FCC Forms 471. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review and/or Requests for Waiver filed by Alpine Union School District, Ashland School District 5, The Lake Grove School, IVCI on behalf of The Lake Grove School, Mt. Lebanon School District, and Three Rivers Community Schools ARE GRANTED and their underlying applications
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-618A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-618A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-618A1.txt
    • and DVR devices. The Bureau has already granted GCL a limited waiver of the ban on integrated set top boxes for the Scientific Atlanta Explorer 1850 as well as the Scientific Atlanta Explorer 2200 and the Scientific Atlanta Explorer 8300 digital video recorder, finding that the extraordinary typhoon damage that GCL has endured demonstrated good cause for waiver under Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's rules. BACKGROUND Through Section 629 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), Congress intended to ensure that consumers have the opportunity to purchase navigation devices such as set top boxes from sources other than their multichannel video programming distributor (``MVPD''). To achieve the goals set forth in the Act, the Commission in
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-620A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-620A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-620A1.txt
    • security was limited to one year. discussion Baja seeks an extension of at least one year for the time-limited portion of the waiver, and a clarification that the waiver for refurbished devices applies to all refurbished devices, and is not limited to high-definition (``HD'') set top boxes and digital video recorder (``DVR'') devices. Baja filed its request pursuant to Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's rules. The Bureau has granted waiver of the integration ban pursuant to those rule sections in cases of non-speculative, extraordinary financial hardship. In light of Baja's demonstrated financial hardship, and consistent with Bureau precedent, we conclude that a limited extension of Baja's request for waiver of the integration ban for new non-HD, non-DVR set top
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-621A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-621A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-621A1.txt
    • other than their MVPD. Although the cable industry has challenged the lawfulness of the integration ban on three separate occasions, in each of those cases the D.C. Circuit denied those petitions. In limited circumstances, however, operators may be eligible for waiver of the integration ban. discussion Petitioner makes its request for waiver pursuant to the Financial Hardship Order and Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's rules. In light of Petitioner's demonstrated financial hardship, we conclude that, consistent with the Financial Hardship Order, a grant of its Waiver Request for one year from the release date of this Order is justified under Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's rules. We therefore grant Petitioner a time-limited waiver of the integration ban.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-655A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-655A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-655A1.txt
    • filing requirement for VRS payment formulas and revenue requirements immediately. After considering the issues before it, the Commission will provide further guidance to the Fund administrator in a subsequent order. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i)-(j), 225, and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i)-(j), 225, and 303(r), and sections 0.361, 1.3 and 64.604(c)(5)(iii) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.361, 1.3, and 64.604(c)(5)(iii), this Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Fund administrator's May 1, 2011 filing deadline for VRS payment formulas and revenue requirements, pursuant to section 64.604(c)(5)(iii)(E) and (H) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 64.604(c)(5)(iii)(E), (H), IS WAIVED as provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-656A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-656A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-656A1.txt
    • that date. . We encourage carriers to use any and all methods they deem necessary to ensure that their filings are timely received. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that this order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the petition for waiver of sections 54.307(d), 54.313, and 54.314 of the Commission's rules filed by
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-672A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-672A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-672A1.txt
    • B and C, and issue an award or a denial based on a complete review and analysis no later than 90 calendar days from release of this order. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that waivers of sections 54.504(b) and (c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 54.504(b) and (c), ARE GRANTED to the petitioners listed in Appendices A and B and their applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration consistent with this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-723A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-723A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-723A1.txt
    • requests for review for those petitioners listed in Appendices A and C ARE GRANTED and REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 54.722(a), sections 54.503 and 54.511 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 54.503, 54.511 ARE WAIVED for those petitioners listed in Appendix B to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-732A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-732A2.txt
    • 25.9507933.62069 26.81NA NA No 2 Turkish lira 49 32.6048442.24138 26.81NA NA No 2 Turkish lira 99 65.8750885.34483 26.81NA NA No 1 Turkish lira 110.04 73.2211594.86207 26.81NA free wifi modem no 1 Turkish lira 110.4 73.4606995.17242 26.81NA 300 one-time fee no 1 Turkish lira 137.8 91.69278118.7931 26.81NA 300 one-time fee no 1 Turkish lira 137.8 91.69278118.7931 26.81NA free wifi modem no 1.3 Pound 5 7.7258347.473842NA SKY TV subscription required None No Federal Communications Commission DA 11-732 1.3 Pound 12.5 19.31458 18.6846NA SKY TV subscription required None No 1.3 Pound 15 23.177522.42152NA None No 1.3 Pound 11.25 17.3831316.81614NA SKY TV subscription required None yes - Broadband and Phone 1.3 Pound 18.75 28.9718828.02691NA SKY TV subscription required None yes - Broadband and Phone 1.3
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-738A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-738A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-738A1.txt
    • 60 day deadline established by section 54.307(d) of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, NewComm is eligible for high-cost support as of March 1, 2006. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that this order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver of section 54.307(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.307(d), filed by NewComm Wireless Services, Inc. d/b/a MoviStar IS DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that USAC SHALL CONSIDER, for the purposes of providing high-cost
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-739A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-739A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-739A1.txt
    • received. We conclude that no carrier has demonstrated that good cause exists to grant its petition. Therefore, we deny all of the petitions. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that this order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Petition for Waiver of Section 54.307(c) of the Commission's Rules filed by Allo Communications IS
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-740A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-740A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-740A1.txt
    • Range. . We encourage carriers to use any and all methods they deem necessary to ensure that their filings are timely received. IV. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that this order is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver of section 54.307(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.307(c), filed by Grande Communications Networks, Inc., IS DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the high-cost loop support filing for the first quarter of 2006,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-741A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-741A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-741A1.txt
    • rule. We also direct the USAC to waive any associated invoice filing deadlines and any other procedural deadlines that were missed while these issues were on appeal with the Commission. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by Lancaster School District, Lancaster, Pennsylvania, IS GRANTED and the underlying application IS REMANDED to USAC for further consideration to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-80A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-80A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-80A1.txt
    • than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the rules. . Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i) and 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), and 251(e), sections 1.3 and 52.111 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 52.111, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91 and 0.291, that the toll-free numbers 1-800-784-2433 (1-800-SUICIDE), 1-877-784-2432 (1-877-SUICIDA), and 1-888-784-2433 (1-888-SUICIDE) are temporarily assigned to the Responsible Organization chosen by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-819A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-819A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-819A1.txt
    • invoices to USAC within six years of the date of their initial funding commitment letter. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-54, 254, and pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and 54.623 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.623, the June 31, 2011 funding request deadline, IS WAIVED as set forth above for the second and third funding years of the Pilot Program to the extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-81A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-81A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-81A1.txt
    • Truth-in-Billing and Billing Format, CC Docket Nos. 90-571, 92-237, 95-116, 96-45, 98-170, 98-171, 99-200, NSD File No. L-OO-72, Report and Order and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 17 FCC Rcd 24952, 24972, para. 36 (2002) (2002 Interim Contribution Methodology Order). Id. . See 2002 Interim Contribution Methodology Order, 17 FCC Rcd at 24972, para. 36. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See supra note 2. (continued . . .) Federal Communications Commission DA 11-81 Federal Communications Commission DA 11-81 l - � � � e � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 0 0 * , � � � �
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-820A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-820A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-820A1.txt
    • outside of the filing window. In addition, we find no evidence of waste, fraud or abuse in the record at this time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and the authority delegated pursuant to authority in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that sections 54.507(c) and 54.720(c) of the Commission's rules ARE WAIVED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and the authority delegated pursuant to sections
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-834A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-834A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-834A1.txt
    • Homeland Security Bureau See File No. 0003190744 (filed Oct. 4, 2007, as amended Dec. 27, 2007 (attaching Petition (requesting waiver) and submitting amendment to the request) (Waiver Request); Jan. 22, 2009 (Amended Waiver Request) (attaching Amendment to Engineering Report (Amended Engineering Report)). 47 C.F.R. �� 20.9(a)(6), 22.621. See Amended Waiver Request at 1-2. Additionally, on our own motion under Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, we consider waiver relief of Section 22.623(b). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 22.623(b). 47 U.S.C. � 337(c). 47 C.F.R. � 1.925. Waiver Request at 1-2. File No. 0003190744, Attachment ``MERA Pt.22 Ex 3,'' Letter from Robert T. Doyle, Sheriff, Marin County Sheriff's Office, to Chief, Policy Division, PSHSB, FCC (July 11, 2007) (Marin County Sheriff Letter). Waiver
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-835A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-835A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-835A1.txt
    • a waiver of section 54.503 of the Commission's rules in this instance is in the public interest and deny Juvenile Service's request for waiver. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 54.722(a), that the request for waiver of section 54.503 of the Commission's rules filed by the Maryland Department of Juvenile Services on January 3, 2006, is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.102(b)(1), this order SHALL BE
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-859A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-859A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-859A1.txt
    • 1988. We find that AT&T Mobility's certification satisfies the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, as codified in sections 1.2001-1.2003 of the Commission's rules. ordering clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 214(e)(6) of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. � 214(e)(6), and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 54.722(a), AT&T Mobility LLC IS DESIGNATED AN ELIGIBLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIER to serve Tribal members residing on the Pine Ridge Reservation in South Dakota, to the extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that AT&T Mobility LLC SHALL SUBMIT additional information pursuant to section 54.209 of the Commission's rules,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-864A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-864A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-864A1.txt
    • 11 Tf (\(telecommunications relay service\).) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.799 388.799 Tm 144 Tz /OPBaseFont0 7 Tf (647) Tj 1 0 0 1 88.55 384.5 Tm 88 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (C.F.R.) Tj 1 0 0 1 118.05 382.599 Tm 65 Tz /OPBaseFont0 11 Tf (�) Tj 1 0 0 1 126.2 384.5 Tm 88 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (1.3.) Tj 1 0 0 1 75.35 367 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC,) Tj 1 0 0 1 249.1 367 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (897 F.2d 1164, 1166 \(D.C. Cir. 1990\)) Tj 1 0 0 1 402.7 366.75 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (\(Northeast Cellular\).) Tj 1 0 0 1 76.8
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-87A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-87A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-87A1.txt
    • amount of support based on the new schools' discounts rates, as long as the amount of funding committed is the same or lower than in the original requests. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the requests for waiver filed by the Camden City Public Schools, the School District of Greenville County, and the Lenoir County Public Schools ARE GRANTED and the underlying applications are REMANDED to USAC for further action consistent with this order no later than 60 calendar
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-883A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-883A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-883A1.txt
    • Bureau acting on delegated authority - will select the vendor(s) to serve as the LNPA(s). The Commission or the Bureau will also decide at a later date who should manage the LNPA contract(s). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i) and 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), and 251(e), sections 1.3 and 52.111 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 52.111, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91 and 0.291, that authority is delegated to the North American Numbering Council, with assistance from the North American Portability Management LLC, as set forth above. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-88A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-88A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-88A1.txt
    • requests for omitted item 21 attachments, USAC should treat the associated applications as out of window for the purposes of meeting the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, that pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4, 254, and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154, 254, and 403, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that this report and order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.103(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.103(a), that this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Gina M. Spade Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Federal-State Joint Board
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-899A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-899A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-899A1.txt
    • Section 15.510(b) to permit the operation of the Wallscanner D-tect Professional by those engaged commercially in the construction or building trades, and for building inspector and structural engineers in the United States. The Commission issued a Public Notice soliciting comments on Bosch's request on December 17, 2010. Only Bosch filed comments. We are authorized to grant a waiver under Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules if the petitioner demonstrates good cause for such action. Good cause, in turn, may be found and a waiver granted ``where particular facts would make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest.'' To make this public interest determination, the waiver cannot undermine the purposes of the rule, and there must be a stronger public interest benefit
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-966A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-966A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-966A1.txt
    • Report and Order in CC Docket Nos. 96-262 and 94-1, Report and Order in CC Docket No. 99-249, Eleventh Report and Order in CC Docket No. 96-45, 15 FCC Rcd 12962, 12993, para. 80 (2000) (CALLS Order) (subsequent history omitted). Id. at 5-6. Id. at 9. Generally, the Commission's rules may be waived for good cause shown. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). In addition, the Commission may take into account considerations of hardship, equity, or more effective implementation of overall policy on an individual basis.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-981A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-981A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-981A1.txt
    • the limited waiver granted here, we find that regulation pursuant to the Part 61 rules is sufficient to address any potential issues that may arise concerning the effects of the waiver on the 2011 annual filing. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 201-205 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 201-205, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, section 61.42(g) of the Commission's rules IS WAIVED for TIPToP service offered by AT&T with respect to AT&T's 2011 annual access tariff filing, required by section 61.43 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-147A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-147A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-147A1.txt
    • contained in sections 1, 2, 4(i), 201-206, 214, 218-220, 251, 252, 254, 256, 303(r), 332, and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 152, 154(i), 201-206, 214, 218-220, 251, 252, 254, 256, 303(r), 332, 403, 1302, and pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.131, 0.201(d), 0.291, 0.331, 1.3, and 1.427 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.131, 0.201(d), 0.291, 0.331, 1.3, 1.427 and pursuant to the delegations of authority in paragraphs 581 and 1404 of FCC 11-161 (rel. Nov. 18, 2011), that this Order IS ADOPTED, effective thirty (30) days after publication of the text or summary thereof in the Federal Register, except for those rules
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-151A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-151A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-151A1.txt
    • days as required by the Commission's rules). Section 54.719(c) of the Commission's rules provides that any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of USAC may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c) (2011). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720 (2011). The Commission may waive any provision of its rules for good cause shown. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (2011). � � kdC � % 7 > C M N b q x } � � � � � � � � � % 7 > C M N b q x } � � � � � � � � � M N � � � � � � % 7 M q � � � � �
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-168A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-168A2.txt
    • Telephone Cooperative, Inc. ) For Waiver of 47 C.F.R. Sections 36.3, 36.123-126, ) 36.141, 36.152-157, 36.191 and 36.372-382 ) to Unfreeze Part 36 Category Relationships ) To: Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau PETITION OF EASTEX TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE, INC. FOR WAIVER OF 47 C.F.R. SECTIONS 36.3, 36.123-126, 36.141, 36.152-157, 36.191 AND 36.372- 382 TO UNFREEZE PART 36 CATEGORY RELATIONSHIPS Pursuant to Section 1.3 of the rules of the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC" or "Commission"),1 Eastex Telephone Cooperative, Inc. ("Eastex" or the "Cooperative") hereby requests a permanent waiver of 47 C.F.R. Sections 36.3, 36.123- 126, 36.141, 36.152-157, 36.191 and 36.372-382 (hereinafter referred to as "Frozen Category Rules") as these rules relate to frozen category relationships entirely removing the category freeze for Eastex. Alternatively, Eastex
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-189A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-189A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-189A1.txt
    • services or the petitioners' applications. We direct USAC to discontinue recovery actions based on the denials reviewed in this order against the parties whose requests are addressed herein. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the requests for review or requests for waiver filed by the petitioners listed in the appendix ARE GRANTED and their underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-193A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-193A1.txt
    • Materials only for official purposes pertaining to providing comments and other filings to the Federal Communication Commission ("FCC") for use in the proceeding identified above, and in subsequent judicial proceedings (the "Project"). 1.2.Licensee shall not transfer, sell, rent, disclose, make available or otherwise communicate, resell, sublicense or use the Licensed Materials for any other purpose or in any other manner. 1.3.Licensee shall only make copies of the licensed CQBAT Output as required for the Project as described in the Second Supplemental Protective Order. On any copy of the CQBAT Output that Licensee is permitted to make or distribute, Licensee shall reproduce all copyright notices and any other proprietary legends of CostQuest as they appear. 1.4.Licensee shall not make any copies, distribute,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-200A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-200A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-200A1.txt
    • was requested and committed. We thus deny in part e-BI's request for waiver seeking an expansion of the pilot participants' funding commitments. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, that pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4, 254, and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154, 254, and 403, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that this order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-240A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-240A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-240A1.txt
    • the release date of this order. In remanding these applications to USAC, we make no finding as to the ultimate eligibility of the services or the petitioners' applications. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the requests for review or requests for waiver filed by the petitioners listed in appendix A ARE GRANTED and their underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-241A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-241A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-241A1.txt
    • the purchase price. We find that these 16 petitioners also did not demonstrate that good cause exists to justify a waiver of section 54.523 of the Commission's rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the request for review or request for waiver filed by Fairfield County School District IS GRANTED and its underlying application IS REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-247A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-247A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-247A1.txt
    • they did not conduct a fair and open competitive bidding process. We further find that the petitioners have not demonstrated that good cause exists to waive the requirements. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the requests for review or requests for waiver filed by the petitioners listed in the appendix ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Gina M. Spade Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX Petitioner Application Number(s) Funding Year Date Request for Review/Waiver Filed Laurens County
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-248A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-248A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-248A1.txt
    • the ultimate eligibility of the services or the petitioners' applications. We direct USAC to discontinue recovery actions against those parties based on the denials that are addressed herein. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the requests for review or requests for waiver filed by the petitioners listed in the appendices ARE GRANTED and their underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-24A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-24A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-24A1.txt
    • Tj 1 0 0 1 105.6 266.449 Tm 99 Tz (filers must submit two additional copies for each additional docket or rulemaking number.) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 195.149 Tm 91 Tz ('Walnut Hill Telephone Company Request for Review of a Decision by the Universal Service Administrative) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.85 183.85 Tm (Company Pursuant to Section 1.3, 32.18,) Tj 1 0 0 1 237.35 183.649 Tm 88 Tz /OPBaseFont5 11 Tf (54.719) Tj 1 0 0 1 267.6 183.399 Tm 91 Tz /OPBaseFont4 11 Tf (and 54.722 of the Commission's rules and Petition for Waiver of) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 172.099 Tm (Section 32.27\(c\) of the Commission's Rules, WC Docket No. 08-71 \(filed Dec. 22,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-250A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-250A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-250A1.txt
    • of the record, we affirm USAC's decisions and deny these requests. We also find that petitioners have not demonstrated good cause justifying a waiver of the Commission's rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the requests for review or requests for waiver filed by the petitioners listed in the appendix ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Gina M. Spade Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX Petitioner Application Number(s) Funding Year Date Request for Review/Waiver Filed AllWays, Inc.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-259A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-259A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-259A1.txt
    • services or the Petitioners' applications. We direct USAC to discontinue recovery actions against the Petitioners for those applications listed in Appendix A from which it is seeking recovery. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the requests for review or requests for waiver filed by the Petitioners for the applications listed in Appendix A ARE GRANTED and their underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-260A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-260A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-260A1.txt
    • the Commission's competitive bidding requirements. In addition, we find that petitioners have not demonstrated that good cause exists to justify a waiver of the Commission's competitive bidding requirements. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the requests for review or requests for waiver filed by the petitioners listed in the appendix ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Gina M. Spade Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX Petitioner Application Number(s) Funding Year Date Request for Review/Waiver Filed Charlton County
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-261A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-261A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-261A1.txt
    • cause exists to grant a limited waiver of section 54.504(c) of our rules and remand Oakland's appeal to USAC for further processing consistent with our decision. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the request for review and waiver filed by Oakland Unified School District IS GRANTED and the underlying application IS REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-278A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-278A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-278A1.txt
    • or the petitioners' applications. We direct USAC to discontinue recovery actions based on the denials we reviewed in this order for those parties whose requests are addressed herein. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the requests for review or requests for waiver filed by the petitioners listed in the appendix ARE GRANTED and their underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-27A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-27A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-27A1.txt
    • 111 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 15 1-154 and) Tj 1 0 0 1 450 592.149 Tm 104 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (254,) Tj 1 0 0 1 472.05 592.149 Tm 108 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (and sections) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.549 579.649 Tm 111 Tz (0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722\(a\) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722\(a\), the) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.049 566.95 Tm 110 Tz (requests for review or requests for waiver filed by the petitioners listed in appendices A and B ARE) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.299 554.45 Tm (GRANTED and their underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-28A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-28A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-28A1.txt
    • of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 151-154 and) Tj 1 0 0 1 449.5 706.35 Tm 97 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (254,) Tj 1 0 0 1 471.8 706.35 Tm 98 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (and pursuant to) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.299 693.649 Tm 99 Tz (authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.29 1, 1.3 and) Tj 1 0 0 1 299 693.649 Tm 97 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (54.722\(a\)) Tj 1 0 0 1 344.4 693.649 Tm 103 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (of the commission's rules, 47 c.F.R.) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.799 678.75 Tm 69 Tz (�) Tj 1 0 0 1 84.2 680.95 Tm 100 Tz (0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722\(a\),
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-291A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-291A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-291A1.txt
    • three suicide prevention hotline numbers to SAMHSA. In view of the parties' joint petition, there is good cause to further extend the current assignment so the Commission can fully review this submission. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i) and 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), and 251(e), sections 1.3 and 52.111 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 52.111, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91 and 0.291, the current assignment of toll free numbers 1-800-784-2433 (1-800-SUICIDE), 1-877-784-2432 (1-877-SUICIDA), and 1-888-784-2433 (1-888-SUICIDE) to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration IS EXTENDED to April 16,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-298A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-298A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-298A1.txt
    • the authority contained in sections 1, 2, 4(i), 201-206, 214, 218-220, 251, 252, 254, 256, 303(r), 332, and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 152, 154(i), 201-206, 214, 218-220, 251, 252, 254, 256, 303(r), 332, 403, 1302, and pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.201(d), 0.291, 1.3, and 1.427 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.201(d), 0.291, 1.3, 1.427 and pursuant to the delegation of authority in paragraph 1404 of FCC 11-161 (rel. Nov. 18, 2011), that this Order IS ADOPTED, effective thirty (30) days after publication of the text or summary thereof in the Federal Register, except for those rules and requirements involving Paperwork
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-29A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-29A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-29A1.txt
    • 287.099 Tm 101 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 15 1-154 and) Tj 1 0 0 1 448.3 286.849 Tm 98 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (254,) Tj 1 0 0 1 470.85 286.849 Tm /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (and sections) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.85 274.6 Tm 100 Tz (0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and) Tj 1 0 0 1 162.95 274.6 Tm 97 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (54.722\(a\)) Tj 1 0 0 1 208.05 274.35 Tm 103 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and) Tj 1 0 0 1 480.95 274.149 Tm 97 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (54.722\(a\),) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.6 261.649
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.txt
    • are included in the ``religion'' format category, according to BIA's database. This category includes religious music and religious talk. If we group BIA's music-focused format categories, we find that 12.6 percent of LPFM stations have music as their primary format. The most popular types of music formats are rock (2.2 percent), classic rock (1.2 percent), oldies (2.3 percent), and country (1.3 percent). Gospel or Southern Gospel is listed as a format for 15 (1.9 percent) stations. There are 28 (3.6 percent) LPFM stations with a Spanish format and two stations with an ethnic format. In addition, 254 stations (33 percent) were classified in the ``miscellaneous'' format category, while only two have news formats and four have talk formats. In BIA's list
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-300A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-300A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-300A1.txt
    • completion of its review of the applications listed in appendix B, USAC shall discontinue recovery actions against those applicants that provide sufficient documentation to support their discount calculation. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the requests for review or requests for waiver filed by the petitioners listed in appendices A and B ARE GRANTED and their underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-310A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-310A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-310A1.txt
    • the cost of installation, and any CableCARD-related service calls over the previous twelve months. Petitioners shall file these reports beginning one year from the release date of this Order. We will use the information from the reports to ensure that grant of this waiver continues to serve the public interest. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commissions rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 76.7, a waiver of the integration ban portion of Section 76.1204(a)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 76.1204(a)(1) IS GRANTED to San Juan Cable LLC d/b/a OneLink Communications and Liberty Cablevision of Puerto Rico, Ltd. for three years from the date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-315A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-315A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-315A1.txt
    • d/b/a Sprocket Wireless 54.307(c) 12/6/10 . or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice), (202) 418-0432 (tty). For further information, please contact Abdel Eqab, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Generally, the Commission's rules may be waived if good cause is shown. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). In addition, the Commission may take into account considerations of hardship, equity, or more effective implementation of overall policy on an individual basis.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-315A1_Rcd.pdf
    • Division has found that there is good cause to grant the requested waivers because the missed deadlines were the result of minor ministerial, clerical, or procedural errors. The Division also notes that all of the petitions were unopposed.2These petitions and related information are listed below: 1Generally, the Commission's rules may be waived if good cause is shown. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). In addition, the Commission may take into account considerations of hardship, equity, or more effective implementation of overall policy on an individual basis.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-316A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-316A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-316A1.txt
    • � 69.3(e)(11). NECA submitted a letter indicating that it has no objection to the inclusion of the lines in the NECA tariff. See Letter from Tracey E.J. Saltenberger, Deputy Counsel, NECA to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed July 7, 2008). Generally, the Commission's rules may be waived if good cause is shown. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). In addition, the Commission may take into account considerations of hardship, equity, or more effective implementation of overall policy on an individual basis.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-316A1_Rcd.pdf
    • C.F.R. � 69.3(e)(11). NECA submitted a letter indicating that it has no objection to the inclusion of the lines in the NECA tariff. SeeLetter from Tracey E.J. Saltenberger, Deputy Counsel, NECA to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed July 7, 2008). 7Generally, the Commission's rules may be waived if good cause is shown. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). In addition, the Commission may take into account considerations of hardship, equity, or more effective implementation of overall policy on an individual basis.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-323A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-323A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-323A1.txt
    • receipt of the submitted invoices. In remanding these applications to USAC, we make no finding as to the ultimate eligibility of the services requested or the petitioners' applications. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the requests for review or requests for waiver filed by the petitioners listed in the appendix ARE GRANTED and their underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-334A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-334A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-334A1.txt
    • from the release date of this order. In remanding these applications to USAC, we make no finding as to the ultimate eligibility of the services or NATIVE's applications. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the request for review filed by Northeast Arizona Technological Institute of Vocational Education IS GRANTED and the underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-335A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-335A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-335A1.txt
    • the release date of this order. In remanding these applications to USAC, we make no finding as to the ultimate eligibility of the services or the petitioners' applications. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the requests for review or requests for waiver filed by Mary Queen of Martyrs and Norwalk La Mirada Unified School District ARE GRANTED and their underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-337A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-337A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-337A1.txt
    • (10th Cir. filed Dec. 18, 2011) (and consolidated cases). 47 C.F.R. � 54.711. See 76 FR 73830. Cf. Verizon Wireless Petition for Limited Waiver of Safe Harbor Single Election Requirement and Criteria for Consolidated Filing of Universal Service Revenue Reports, WC Docket No. 06-122, Order, 23 FCC Rcd 5212, 5214-16, paras. 5-8 (Wireline Comp. Bur. 2009). .See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see also Northeast Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990); accord NetworkIP, LLC v. FCC, 548 F.3d 116, 127 (D.C. Cir. 2008) (stating that in addition to the public interest being well-served, there must also be a sufficiently ``unique situation'' to grant waiver). We note that contributors remain obligated to report other access charge revenue that
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-369A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-369A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-369A1.txt
    • calculation for each application and deny these requests. We also find that petitioners have not demonstrated good cause justifying a waiver of section 54.505 of the Commission's rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the requests for review or requests for waiver filed by the petitioners listed in the appendix ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Gina M. Spade Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX Petitioner Application Number(s) Funding Year Date Request for Review/Waiver Filed Enterprise City
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-370A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-370A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-370A1.txt
    • application is urban pursuant to E-rate program rules. We also find that petitioners have not demonstrated good cause justifying a waiver of section 505(b)(3) the Commission's E-rate rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the requests for review or requests for waiver filed by the petitioners listed in the appendix ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Gina M. Spade Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX A Appeals Denied on the Merits Petitioner Application Number(s) Funding Year Date
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-377A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-377A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-377A1.txt
    • 3 Channel Averages January 1, 2010 Cable Programming Service Overall Average Non Compet-itive Effective Competition Subgroups Group Second Cable Operator DBS Other Incumbent Rival Both Basic Service 41.0 37.4 48.1 49.9 42.9 48.7 48.5 43.6 Standard Error 0.6 0.7 1.1 1.7 2.5 1.5 1.5 2.8 Prior Year 36.9 34.1 42.3 43.9 45.5 44.2 41.9 40.1 Standard Error 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.3 3.2 1.2 1.2 2.0 Expanded Basic Service 117.0 111.6 127.8 128.6 183.6 138.0 125.4 115.5 Standard Error 1.3 1.6 1.9 3.6 10.3 3.5 2.5 5.3 Prior Year 101.6 98.3 108.2 113.7 172.9 123.7 103.4 98.1 Standard Error 1.0 1.4 1.5 3.1 8.9 3.0 1.8 3.9 Next Most Popular Service 189.1 180.1 206.3 212.5 227.3 215.1 203.9 198.6 Standard Error 1.8
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-385A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-385A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-385A1.txt
    • gap in service at this location. Nevertheless, we will treat Intelsat 706 as a replacement satellite. In this regard, we waive Section 25.165(e)(2) of the Commission's rules. Section 25.165(e)(2) defines a replacement satellite as a satellite that is scheduled to be launched and brought into use before the existing satellite is retired. We may grant a waiver pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules if there is good cause for such action. Good cause may be found ``where particular facts would make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest.'' To make this public interest determination, the waiver cannot undermine the purposes of the rule, and there must be a stronger public interest benefit in granting the waiver than in applying
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-385A1_Rcd.pdf
    • a gap in service at this location. Nevertheless, we will treat Intelsat 706 as a replacement satellite. In this regard, we waive Section 25.165(e)(2) of the Commission's rules. Section 25.165(e)(2) defines a replacement satellite as a satellite that is scheduled to be launched and brought into use before the existing satellite is retired.18We may grant a waiver pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules if there is good cause for such action.19Good cause may be found "where particular facts would make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest."20 To make this public interest determination, the waiver cannot undermine the purposes of the rule, and there must be a stronger public interest benefit in granting the waiver than in applying the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-389A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-389A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-389A1.txt
    • USTelecom Petition is February 16, 2013, so the Bureau extends PRT's deadline to that same date. This extension is subject to the same conditions imposed in the Puerto Rico Telephone Waiver Order. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 154(j), and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91 and 0.291, the current deadline applicable to Puerto Rico Telephone Company, Inc. for compliance with section 64.1903 or dominant carrier regulation for these services IS EXTENDED to February 16, 2013. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-396A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-396A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-396A1.txt
    • 47 C.F.R. � 54.706. See Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Sixteenth Order on Reconsideration, CC Docket No. 96-45, Eighth Report and Order, CC Docket No. 96-45, Sixth Report and Order, Docket No. 96-262, 15 FCC Rcd 1679, 1687-1692, paras. 17-29 (1999) (Fifth Circuit Remand Order). Generally, the Commission's rules may be waived for good cause shown. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). In addition, the Commission may take into account considerations of hardship, equity, or more effective implementation of overall policy on an individual basis.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-39A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-39A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-39A1.txt
    • 389.099 Tm 109 Tz (related information are listed below:) Tj 1 0 0 1 75.1 326.399 Tm 101 Tz (Generally, the Commission's rules may be waived if good cause is shown. 47 C.F.R.) Tj 1 0 0 1 421.9 324.549 Tm 71 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (�) Tj 1 0 0 1 430.05 326.199 Tm 87 Tz /OPBaseFont3 10 Tf (1.3.) Tj 1 0 0 1 449 326.199 Tm 100 Tz (The Commission may) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 314.899 Tm 99 Tz (exercise its discretion to waive a rule where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 303.399 Tm 95 Tz /OPBaseFont4 10 Tf (interest.) Tj 1 0 0 1
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-413A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-413A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-413A1.txt
    • or the petitioners' applications. We direct USAC to discontinue recovery actions based on the denials we reviewed in this order for those parties whose requests are addressed herein. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the requests for review or requests for waiver filed by the petitioners listed in the appendix ARE GRANTED and their underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-41A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-41A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-41A1.txt
    • Industry Council (``USGPSIC'') oppose the waiver request while the Federal Railroad Administration (''FRA''), AKELA Inc., and Robert Bosch GmbH (``Bosch'') support the request. Recently, the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (``NTIA''), under its own administrative process, has approved the CWCI 3d-Radar for use by the United States Department of Transportation. DISCUSSION We are authorized to grant a waiver under Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules if the petitioner demonstrates good cause for such action. Good cause, in turn, may be found and a waiver granted ``where particular facts would make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest.'' To make this public interest determination, the waiver cannot undermine the purpose of the rule, and there must be a stronger public interest benefit
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-424A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-424A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-424A1.txt
    • is appropriate to grant the requested waiver. This Order therefore grants Sorenson's waiver request. Sorenson may therefore proceed with either TCB certification or a Self-Declaration of Conformity pursuant to Part 68 of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.141 and 0.361 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the request for waiver of section 68.317(f) for Models 57T and 57Tx, filed by Sorenson Communications, Inc., IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: (1) the volume reset override switch shall be labeled as such and located on the telephone in such a way as to not be accessible to accidental engagement;
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-430A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-430A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-430A1.txt
    • send a copy of this Order to Congress and the Government Accountability Office pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, because the conditional waiver adopted in this Order does not amend the Commission's rules. ORDERING CLAUSES IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 719 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 620, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, Section 64.610(f)(2) of the Commission's rules is conditionally waived to permit NDBEDP certified programs to submit claims for reimbursement more frequently than once every six months as required by Section 64.610(f)(2) of our rules and are permitted to submit reimbursement claims up to one time each month. IT IS ALSO ORDERED that
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-433A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-433A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-433A1.txt
    • the 30-day period ``except upon leave granted upon a separate pleading for leave to file.'' Because no such separate pleading has been submitted, we dismiss the petition as untimely. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154, 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.106, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.106, 54.722(a), the petition for reconsideration filed by the Maryland Department of Juvenile Services IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Trent Harkrader Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Nancy Seidman, Maryland Department of Juvenile Services, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, CC
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-460A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-460A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-460A1.txt
    • release date of this order. In remanding the application to USAC, we make no finding as to the ultimate eligibility of the services requested or Approach Learning's application. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the request for review filed by the Approach Learning and Assessment Center IS GRANTED and the underlying application IS REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with this order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Trent Harkrader Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Requests for Review
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-482A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-482A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-482A1.txt
    • ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4 (i) and (j), 201-209, of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), (j), 201-209, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, this order IS HEREBY ADOPTED as described above. 15. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commissions rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, sections 69.3(a), 51.907(b), and 51.909(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 69.3(a), , 51.907(b), 51.909(b), ARE WAIVED for the limited purpose specified in paragraph 2 supra. 16. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-489A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-489A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-489A1.txt
    • calculation consistent with this order. We direct USAC, in light of the foregoing, to take into consideration the revised discount calculation in its recovery action related to Friendship. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the requests for review filed by the petitioners listed in the Appendix A ARE DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-491A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-491A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-491A1.txt
    • Unconstructed Stations Resulting in Automatic Termination of Licenses, Public Notice, 21 FCC Rcd 163 (WTB 2006). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(3); see also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990); WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969), aff'd, 459 F.2d 1203 (1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972); 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. BRS/EBS Second Report and Order, 21 FCC Rcd at 5720 � 278, citing 47 U.S.C. � 309(j)(4)(B). 116 Late-Filed Renewal Applications MO&O, 24 FCC Rcd at 8118-8119 � 31. See Petition at 1. File No. 0004764795 (filed Jun. 21, 2011). See Reminder Notice. 47 C.F.R. � 1.946(e)(1). Waiver and Extension Request at 2. 47 C.F.R. � 1.946(e)(2). The Bureau has
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-491A1_Rcd.pdf
    • System that Identifies Unconstructed Stations Resulting in Automatic Termination of Licenses, Public Notice, 21 FCC Rcd 163 (WTB 2006). 34See47 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(3); see also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990); WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969), aff'd, 459 F.2d 1203 (1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027(1972); 47 C.F.R. �1.3. 35BRS/EBS Second Report and Order, 21 FCC Rcd at 5720 � 278, citing47 U.S.C. � 309(j)(4)(B). 36116 Late-Filed Renewal ApplicationsMO&O, 24 FCC Rcd at 8118-8119 � 31. 37SeePetition at 1. 3031 Federal Communications Commission DA 12-491 14. We also find that the Archdiocese in fact knew about the deadlines and did not meet them because of its own inaction. As
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-492A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-492A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-492A1.txt
    • does not justify extension). 47 C.F.R. � 1.946(e)(2). See, e.g., Mumford Exhibit at 1. See, e.g., Mumford Exhibit at 1. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.946(e)(2). L N n o � � � � � � � `T Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969), aff'd, 459 F.2d 1203 (1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972); 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. BRS/EBS Second Report and Order, 21 FCC Rcd at 5720 � 278, citing 47 U.S.C. � 309(j)(4)(B). See, e.g., Mumford Exhibit at 2. See, e.g., Mumford Exhibit at 2. See, e.g., Mumford Exhibit at 2. See, e.g., Mumford Exhibit at 2. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.955(a)(2). See also 47 C.F.R. � 27.14(o). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-492A1_Rcd.pdf
    • that they 27See, e.g., Mumford Exhibit at 1. 28See, e.g., Mumford Exhibit at 1. 29See47 C.F.R. � 1.946(e)(2). 30See47 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(3); see also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990); WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969), aff'd, 459 F.2d 1203 (1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972); 47 C.F.R. �1.3. 31BRS/EBS Second Report and Order, 21 FCC Rcd at 5720 � 278, citing47 U.S.C. � 309(j)(4)(B). 32See, e.g.,Mumford Exhibit at 2. 33See, e.g.,Mumford Exhibit at 2. 34See, e.g., Mumford Exhibit at 2. 3039 Federal Communications Commission DA 12-492 are highly motivated to use their spectrum to bring much needed broadband services to their unserved, rural community that is utterly lacking
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-496A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-496A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-496A1.txt
    • 1. Extension and Waiver Request at 1. 47 C.F.R. � 1.946(e)(1). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.946(e)(2). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(3); see also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990); WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969), aff'd, 459 F.2d 1203 (1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972); 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. BRS/EBS Second Report and Order, 21 FCC Rcd at 5720 � 278, citing 47 U.S.C. � 309(j)(4)(B). Extension and Waiver Request at 1. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.955(a)(2). See also 47 C.F.R. � 27.14(o). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 12-496 Federal Communications Commission DA 12-496 < = � � > � F � . S x
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-496A1_Rcd.pdf
    • Waiver Request, and declare that KSMQ's license to operate Station WNC589 automatically terminated as of November 1, 2011. 26See47 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(3); see also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990); WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969), aff'd, 459 F.2d 1203 (1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972); 47 C.F.R. �1.3. 27BRS/EBS Second Report and Order, 21 FCC Rcd at 5720 � 278, citing47 U.S.C. � 309(j)(4)(B). 28Extension and Waiver Request at 1. 29See47 C.F.R. � 1.955(a)(2). See also47 C.F.R. � 27.14(o). 3051 Federal Communications Commission DA 12-496 14. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 309of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i),
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-515A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-515A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-515A1.txt
    • 1. 47 C.F.R. � 1.946(e)(1). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.946(e)(2). Extension and Waiver Request at 1. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(3); see also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990); WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969), aff'd, 459 F.2d 1203 (1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972); 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. BRS/EBS Second Report and Order, 21 FCC Rcd at 5720 � 278, citing 47 U.S.C. � 309(j)(4)(B). Extension and Waiver Request at 1. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.955(a)(2). See also 47 C.F.R. � 27.14(o). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 12-515 Federal Communications Commission DA 12-515 = > � � ? F � ' ... � �
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-515A1_Rcd.pdf
    • The only "unique circumstance" 1647 C.F.R. � 1.946(e)(1). 17See47 C.F.R. � 1.946(e)(2). 18Extension and Waiver Request at 1. 19See47 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(3); see also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990); WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969), aff'd, 459 F.2d 1203 (1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972); 47 C.F.R. �1.3. 20BRS/EBS Second Report and Order, 21 FCC Rcd at 5720 � 278, citing47 U.S.C. � 309(j)(4)(B). 21Extension and Waiver Request at 1. 3163 Federal Communications Commission DA 12-515 Montevallo demonstrates is its inability to obtain financing, which cannot serve as an excuse for failure to construct. Montevallo currently lacks the ability to construct and operate Station WND520, and we do
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-516A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-516A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-516A1.txt
    • not valid excuses for failure to file a timely renewal application). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.946(e)(2). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(3); see also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990); WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969), aff'd, 459 F.2d 1203 (1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972); 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. BRS/EBS Second Report and Order, 21 FCC Rcd at 5720 � 278, citing 47 U.S.C. � 309(j)(4)(B). Extension Application at 1. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.955(a)(2). See also 47 C.F.R. � 27.14(o). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 12-516 Federal Communications Commission DA 12-516 v w x � F | � � 0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-516A1_Rcd.pdf
    • simple forgetfulness are not valid excuses for failure to file a timely renewal application). 16See47 C.F.R. � 1.946(e)(2). 17See47 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(3); see also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990); WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969), aff'd, 459 F.2d 1203 (1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972); 47 C.F.R. �1.3. 18BRS/EBS Second Report and Order, 21 FCC Rcd at 5720 � 278, citing47 U.S.C. � 309(j)(4)(B). 3167 Federal Communications Commission DA 12-516 applicant's lack of diligence, we believe granting an extension would send the wrong signal to those licensees who acted diligently to provide service. Granting this extension would hinder our ability to strictly enforce construction requirements and meet our
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-529A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-529A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-529A1.txt
    • Unconstructed Stations Resulting in Automatic Termination of Licenses, Public Notice, 21 FCC Rcd 163 (WTB 2006). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(3); see also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990); WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969), aff'd, 459 F.2d 1203 (1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972); 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. BRS/EBS Second Report and Order, 21 FCC Rcd at 5720 � 278, citing 47 U.S.C. � 309(j)(4)(B). See Petition at 1. See, e.g., Redwood Wireless Minnesota, LLC, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 22416 (WTB CWD 2002) (construction delays resulting from business disputes were exercise of business judgment and were not outside Petitioner's control); Eldorado Communications LLC, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 24613
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-529A1_Rcd.pdf
    • System that Identifies Unconstructed Stations Resulting in Automatic Termination of Licenses, Public Notice, 21 FCC Rcd 163 (WTB 2006). 30See47 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(3); see also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990); WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969), aff'd, 459 F.2d 1203 (1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972); 47 C.F.R. �1.3. 31BRS/EBS Second Report and Order, 21 FCC Rcd at 5720 � 278, citing47 U.S.C. � 309(j)(4)(B). 3222 Federal Communications Commission DA 12-529 Rockton did not meet the November 1, 2011 deadline and has failed to present any information to persuade us not to strictly enforce the deadline. Rockton argues that it missed the construction deadline because it had not leased
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-531A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-531A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-531A1.txt
    • 2011). Renewal Waiver Request. Id. at 1. Id. Id. at 1-2. Id. at 2. Id. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(3); see also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990); WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969), aff'd, 459 F.2d 1203 (1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972); 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. BRS/EBS Second Report and Order, 21 FCC Rcd at 5720 � 278, citing 47 U.S.C. � 309(j)(4)(B). While Mr. Pascual's heirs have not formally requested an extension of the May 1, 2011 substantial service deadline, the available facts show that they would not be entitled to an extension. An applicant seeking an extension of a construction deadline must show that
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-531A1_Rcd.pdf
    • license and allow the existing BTA licensee to acquire the spectrum and place it in use.39 35Id. 36Id. 37See47 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(3); see also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990); WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969), aff'd, 459 F.2d 1203 (1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972); 47 C.F.R. �1.3. 38BRS/EBS Second Report and Order, 21 FCC Rcd at 5720 � 278, citing47 U.S.C. � 309(j)(4)(B). 39While Mr. Pascual's heirs have not formally requested an extension of the May 1, 2011 substantial service deadline, the available facts showthat they would not be entitled to an extension. An applicant seeking an extension of a construction deadline must show that its "failure
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-532A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-532A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-532A1.txt
    • Application at 1. Extension Application at 1. Extension Application at 1. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.946(e)(2). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(3); see also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990); WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969), aff'd, 459 F.2d 1203 (1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972); 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. BRS/EBS Second Report and Order, 21 FCC Rcd at 5720 � 278, citing 47 U.S.C. � 309(j)(4)(B). Extension Application at 2. Extension Application at 2. Extension Application at 2. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.955(a)(2). See also 47 C.F.R. � 27.14(o). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 12-532 Federal Communications Commission DA 12-532 o p q � F
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-532A1_Rcd.pdf
    • extension. We 22Extension Application at 1. 23Extension Application at 1. 24Extension Application at 1. 25See47 C.F.R. � 1.946(e)(2). 26See47 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(3); see also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990); WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969), aff'd, 459 F.2d 1203 (1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972); 47 C.F.R. �1.3. 27BRS/EBS Second Report and Order, 21 FCC Rcd at 5720 � 278, citing47 U.S.C. � 309(j)(4)(B). 28Extension Application at 2. 29Extension Application at 2. 30Extension Application at 2. 3237 Federal Communications Commission DA 12-532 question West Blocton's motivation to provide services when no concrete actions were taken to provide service prior to the November 1, 2011 deadline. Moreover, West Blocton
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-539A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-539A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-539A1.txt
    • Request, Extension Request. See File No. 0004872955. See File No. 0004725410. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.946(e)(2). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(3); see also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990); WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969), aff'd, 459 F.2d 1203 (1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972); 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. BRS/EBS Second Report and Order, 21 FCC Rcd at 5720 � 278, citing 47 U.S.C. � 309(j)(4)(B). Waiver Request, Extension Request. 47 C.F.R. � 27.1206(b). See license for Station B125. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.955(a)(2). See also 47 C.F.R. � 27.14(o). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 12-539 Federal Communications Commission DA 12-539 ... � � �
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-539A1_Rcd.pdf
    • in the public interest, we find that Xanadoo's license to operate Station WMY298 automatically 35See47 C.F.R. � 1.946(e)(2). 36See47 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(3); see also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990); WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969), aff'd, 459 F.2d 1203 (1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972); 47 C.F.R. �1.3. 37BRS/EBS Second Report and Order, 21 FCC Rcd at 5720 � 278, citing47 U.S.C. � 309(j)(4)(B). 38Waiver Request, Extension Request. 3947 C.F.R. � 27.1206(b). 40See license for Station B125. 41See47 C.F.R. � 1.955(a)(2). See also47 C.F.R. � 27.14(o). 3270 Federal Communications Commission DA 12-539 terminated on May 1, 2011, the date that BRS licensees that were issued before November 6,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-541A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-541A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-541A1.txt
    • 47 C.F.R. � 1.946(e)(1). 47 C.F.R. � 1.946(e)(2). Extension and Waiver Request at 1. Id. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(3); see also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990); WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969), aff'd, 459 F.2d 1203 (1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972); 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. BRS/EBS Second Report and Order, 21 FCC Rcd at 5720 � 278, citing 47 U.S.C. � 309(j)(4)(B). Extension and Waiver Request at 1. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.955(a)(2). See also 47 C.F.R. � 27.14(o). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 12-541 Federal Communications Commission DA 12-541 � � � F p O t � � � �
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-541A1_Rcd.pdf
    • EBS licensees were required to demonstrate substantial service. We will therefore deny the Extension Application and Waiver Request. 28See47 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(3); see also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990); WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969), aff'd, 459 F.2d 1203 (1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972); 47 C.F.R. �1.3. 29BRS/EBS Second Report and Order, 21 FCC Rcd at 5720 � 278, citing47 U.S.C. � 309(j)(4)(B). 30Extension and Waiver Request at 1. 31See47 C.F.R. � 1.955(a)(2). See also47 C.F.R. � 27.14(o). 3277 Federal Communications Commission DA 12-541 IV. CONCLUSION AND ORDERING CLAUSES 14. Xanadoo has failed to justify an extension of time to meet the substantial service deadline for Stations
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-557A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-557A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-557A1.txt
    • 1091 (D.C. Cir. 1976). See also, Reuters Ltd. v. FCC, 781 F.2d 946, 951-52 (D.C. Cir. 1986). 47 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(3); see also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990); WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969), aff'd, 459 F.2d 1203 (1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972); 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Waiver Request at 4. Waiver Request at 4-5. Waiver Request at 4-5. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.955(a)(2). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 12-557 Federal Communications Commission DA 12-557 k l � " � (R) � � F V 0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-557A1_Rcd.pdf
    • 1086, 1091 (D.C. Cir. 1976). See also, Reuters Ltd. v. FCC, 781 F.2d 946, 951-52 (D.C. Cir. 1986). 2647 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(3); see also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990); WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969), aff'd, 459 F.2d 1203 (1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972); 47 C.F.R. �1.3. 27Waiver Request at 4. 28Waiver Request at 4-5. 29Waiver Request at 4-5. 30See47 C.F.R. � 1.955(a)(2). 3774 Federal Communications Commission DA 12-557 time to demonstrate substantial service listed in the Appendix to this Memorandum Opinion and Order ARE DENIED. 15. ITIS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuantto Sections 4(i) and 303(r) of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 303(r),
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-559A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-559A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-559A1.txt
    • DENY, the Petition for Reconsideration filed by the County of Gilpin, Colorado on March 2, 2009. We further RETURN TO PENDING STATUS File No. 0003731945, to the extent indicated herein, for further processing consistent with this Order and the Commission's rules. Accordingly, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, we also GRANT the Waiver Request, filed by the County of Gilpin, Colorado on February 9, 2009, associated with File No. 0003731945, to the extent indicated herein. We take this action under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.191 and 0.392 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.191, 0.392.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-569A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-569A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-569A1.txt
    • the release date of this order. In remanding these applications to USAC, we make no finding as to the ultimate eligibility of the services or the petitioners' applications. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the requests for review or requests for waiver filed by the petitioners listed in the appendix ARE GRANTED and their underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-575A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-575A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-575A1.txt
    • IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4 (i) and (j), 201-209, of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), (j), 201-209, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, this order IS HEREBY ADOPTED as described above. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commissions rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, sections 69.104 and 69.152 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 69.104, 69.152, ARE WAIVED for the purpose specified in paragraph 7, supra. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.3 of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-599A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-599A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-599A1.txt
    • in violation of section 54.504 of the Commission's rules. We further find that Portales has not demonstrated that good cause exists to waive the Commission's competitive bidding requirements. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the requests for review filed by Portales Municipal School District ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Trent Harkrader Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau See Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 8776, 9029, para.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-604A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-604A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-604A1.txt
    • the ultimate eligibility of the services or the underlying applications. We direct USAC to discontinue recovery actions against those parties based on the denials that are addressed herein. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the requests for review filed by the petitioners listed in the appendix ARE GRANTED and the underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-605A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-605A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-605A1.txt
    • the ultimate eligibility of the services or the underlying applications. We direct USAC to discontinue recovery actions against those parties based on the denials that are addressed herein. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the requests for review filed by Trillion Partners, Inc. ARE GRANTED and the underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-629A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-629A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-629A1.txt
    • as Priority Two services for those funding years when South Bay's discount was lower than the threshold for funding Priority Two requests. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), the Petition for Waiver filed by South Bay Union School District on March 30, 2004 IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.102 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.102, this Order SHALL BE
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-646A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-646A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-646A1.txt
    • we adopt to correct boundaries in the near-term will address those specific instances where an inaccurate boundary could result in a company losing more support than it would otherwise. Specifically, any carrier whose actual boundaries are different from the boundaries used by the Bureau in the methodology we adopt today may file a petition for waiver in accordance with section 1.3 of the Commission's rules. To enable the Bureau to determine whether there are special circumstances (i.e., inaccurate boundaries) supporting a waiver, petitioners must provide accurate boundary information in a manner and format that Bureau staff can readily evaluate and process. In Appendix C, the Bureau sets forth a template for filing study area maps to help potential petitioners file information
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-687A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-687A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-687A1.txt
    • would impose an undue burden on the Fund administrator. We therefore extend the May 1, 2012 Fund administrator filing requirement for VRS payment formulas and revenue requirements pending further guidance. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i)-(j), 225, and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i)-(j), 225, and 303(r), and sections 0.361, 1.3, and 64.604(c)(5)(iii) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.361, 1.3, and 64.604(c)(5)(iii), this Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Fund administrator's May 1, 2012 filing deadline for VRS payment formulas and revenue requirements, pursuant to section 64.604(c)(5)(iii)(E) and (H) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 64.604(c)(5)(iii)(E), (H), IS EXTENDED as provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-689A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-689A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-689A1.txt
    • of section 54.410(a)-(f), and except as described herein with regard to phasing in the $9.25 support amount, are effective May 1, 2012. Section 54.410(a) through (f) will be effective on June 1, 2012. Accordingly, pursuant to sections 1, 4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the Wireline Competition Bureau hereby WAIVES paragraph 58 of FCC 12-11 and section 54.403(a)(1) of the Commission's rules, as amended in FCC 12-11, to the extent described above. Action by the Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau For further information, please contact Kimberly Scardino, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-691A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-691A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-691A1.txt
    • which it is seeking recovery, and from Fayetteville or Cumberland County Library, except with respect to the support for the latter's purchase of telecommunications, which USAC should recover. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the requests for review or requests for waiver filed by the petitioners listed in Appendix A ARE GRANTED and their underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-693A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-693A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-693A1.txt
    • own motion, we also direct USAC to extend any procedural deadlines, such as the FCC Form 486 or invoicing deadlines, that might be necessary to effectuate our ruling. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the request for review and waiver filed by Onslow County School District and the supplement to the request for review and waiver filed by North Carolina Office of Information Technology Services ARE GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-694A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-694A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-694A1.txt
    • Bloomberg's complaint to the extent described above, and further direct Comcast to file the information described above to provide the facts necessary to determine complete relief. Ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and (j), 303(r), 309, and 310(d) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 303(r), 309, 310(d), and Sections 1.3, 76.7, and 76.1302 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 76.7, 76.1302, that the above-captioned complaint filed by Bloomberg, L.P. against Comcast Cable Communications, LLC IS GRANTED to the extent set forth above. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on each headend in the top-35 most populous Nielsen Designated Market Areas that (i) carries Bloomberg Television, (ii) has a grouping
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-703A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-703A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-703A1.txt
    • filed within 30 days thereafter, unless the Commission elects to review the case of its own motion. 47 C.F.R. � 1.276(b).''). To the extent it is necessary to do so, we also waive 47 C.F.R. � 76.1302(j)(1), which provides that Initial Decisions mandating program carriage become effective upon release unless compliance would require the deletion of programming; see id. � 1.3 (Commission may waive any rule on its own motion for good cause). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 12-703 Federal Communications Commission DA 12-703 L a j � � � F p �� D U V V p p
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-708A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-708A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-708A1.txt
    • Raphael Academy as listed in the appendix ARE GRANTED and their underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that section 54.507(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.507(d), IS WAIVED to the limited extent provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Trent B. Harkrader Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX Petitioner Application Number Funding Request Number Funding Year Date Appeal Filed Saint
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-711A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-711A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-711A1.txt
    • on our review of the record, we deny the 10 requests because the petitioners have failed to show special circumstances necessary for the Commission to waive the deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the requests for review or requests for waiver filed by the petitioners listed in the appendix ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Trent Harkrader Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX Petitioner Application Number(s) Funding Year Date Request for Review/Waiver Filed Alex Public School
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-716A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-716A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-716A1.txt
    • that the request for review filed by Billings School District 2, Billings, Montana, IS GRANTED and the underlying application is REMANDED consistent with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, that 54.500 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.500 et seq., ARE WAIVED for the Billings School District 2, Billings, Montana, to the limited extent provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Trent Harkrader Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Federal-State Joint Board on Universal
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-732A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-732A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-732A1.txt
    • of the services or the petitioners' applications. We direct USAC to discontinue recovery actions against those parties listed in Appendix A-C based on our findings in this order. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the requests for review or requests for waiver filed by the petitioners listed in appendices A, B and C ARE GRANTED and their underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-744A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-744A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-744A1.txt
    • and Telemundo Waiver Order at 7281; Azteca Order at 10663. Estrella Order at 4726 (citing Azteca Order at 10,663). Petition at 2. Id. at 6. Id. at 7. Id at.9-10. Id at.13. Id. at 11. Id. at 14. Id. at 11. 5 U.S.C, � 553(b)(3)(B). The Commission may waive its rules where good cause is shown. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; Wait Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 12-744 Federal Communications Commission DA 12-744 B C � � � � F p �
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-749A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-749A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-749A1.txt
    • harm. For the reasons stated above, we grant USAC a limited waiver of the draft audit report deadline set forth in section 54.717(f) of the Commission's rules. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the request for waiver filed by USAC of section 54.717(f) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.717(f), IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �1.102(b)(1), this order SHALL BE effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Trent B.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-753A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-753A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-753A1.txt
    • or the petitioners' applications. We direct USAC to discontinue recovery actions based on the denials we reviewed in this order for those parties whose requests are addressed herein. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the requests for review or requests for waiver filed by the petitioners listed in the appendix ARE GRANTED and their underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-754A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-754A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-754A1.txt
    • review and issue an award or a denial based on a complete review and analysis no later than 90 calendar days from the release date of this order. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the request filed by Diversified Computer Solutions, Inc. on December 24, 2002 IS GRANTED and the underlying application IS REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Trent B. Harkrader Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-759A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-759A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-759A1.txt
    • COMMENT PETITION FOR CLASS WAIVER OF COMMISSION'S RULES FOR ACCESS TO ADVANCED COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES AND EQUIPMENT BY PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES CG Docket No. 10-213 Comments Due: June 14, 2012 Reply Comments Due: June 25, 2012 The Consumer Electronics Association (CEA), pursuant to section 716(h)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the Act), 47 U.S.C. � 617(h)(1), and sections 1.3 and 14.5 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 14.5, has filed a petition for a class waiver of the Commission's rules requiring access to advanced communications services (ACS) and equipment by people with disabilities. CEA seeks a waiver for two classes of equipment: (i) Internet protocol-enabled television sets (IP-TVs) and (ii) Internet protocol-enabled digital video players (IP-DVPs).
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-760A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-760A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-760A1.txt
    • COMMENT PETITION FOR CLASS WAIVER OF COMMISSION'S RULES FOR ACCESS TO ADVANCED COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES AND EQUIPMENT BY PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES CG Docket No. 10-213 Comments Due: June 14, 2012 Reply Comments Due: June 25, 2012 The Entertainment Software Association (ESA), pursuant to section 716(h)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the Act), 47 U.S.C. � 617(h)(1), and sections 1.3 and 14.5 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 14.5, has filed a petition for a class waiver of the Commission's requirements for access to advanced communications services (ACS) and equipment by people with disabilities. ESA seeks a waiver for three classes of equipment: (i) game consoles, both home and handheld, and their peripherals and integrated online networks,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-775A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-775A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-775A1.txt
    • and opacity, character edge attributes, caption window color, language, and preview and setting retention. 47 C.F.R. � 79.103(c). Closed Captioning of Internet Protocol-Delivered Video Programming: Implementation of the Twenty-First Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act of 2010, Report and Order, 27 FCC Rcd 787 (2012) (``IP Closed Captioning Order''). Alternatively, DiMA requests that the Commission uses its authority under Section 1.3 of it rules to waive for good cause the specified portions of Section 79.4(c)(2)(i) for all VPDs until January 1, 2014. ). DiMA member Google does not join the petition. Id. at 1 n. 3. Id. at 2. Id. Alternatively, DiMA requests that the Commission uses its authority under Section 1.3 of it rules to waive for good cause the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-789A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-789A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-789A1.txt
    • by the president of Mount Rushmore. After being informed that the Mount Rushmore president was in the area, the agent left his business card with an employee who agreed to have the president contact the agent, however, the agent never heard from the president. Also on June 1, 2011, the Denver agent inspected the Station KZMX-FM transmitter facility located approximately 1.3 miles from the Stations' main studio location. The agent observed that Station KZMX-FM was operating using a 4-bay, circularly polarized FM antenna, while a 4-bay horizontal FM antenna was on the ground near the KZMX-FM tower. According to the Station KZMX-FM license, it is authorized to operate using horizontal polarization only. In the morning of June 2, 2011, the Denver
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-796A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-796A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-796A1.txt
    • further action consistent with this order. In remanding these applications to USAC, we make no finding as to the ultimate eligibility of the services or the petitioners' applications. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the requests for review or requests for waiver filed by the petitioners listed in Appendices A and B ARE GRANTED and their underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-797A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-797A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-797A1.txt
    • E-rate support. Based on our review of the record, we find that the five petitioners failed to show that the entities denied funding are eligible for E-rate support. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the requests for review or requests for waiver filed by the petitioners listed in the Appendix ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Trent B. Harkrader Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX Petitioner Application Number(s) Funding Year Date Request for Review/Waiver Filed CCRC Community
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-808A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-808A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-808A1.txt
    • unauthorized personnel is minimized and, hence, the caller's legitimate expectation of privacy is adequately addressed. Accordingly, we find good cause to grant NASA's petition for limited waiver to the extent described herein. Ordering clauseS Accordingly, it is ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), (j), and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and the authority delegated in sections 0.141 and 0.361 of the rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, the petition for limited waiver of section 64.1601(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 64.1601(b), filed by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, John F. Kennedy Space Center, in CC Docket No. 91-281, IS
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-812A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-812A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-812A1.txt
    • finding as to the ultimate eligibility of the services or the petitioner's application. At this time, there is no evidence of waste, fraud or abuse in the record. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the request for review filed by Sprint Nextel Corporation, IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART and the underlying application IS REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-839A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-839A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-839A1.txt
    • of less than the maximum allowed 8 dBm/3 kHz. The operation in the same frequency band of a relatively great number of narrowband 100-kilohertz wide signals at the maximum allowed conducted power spectral density of 8 dBm/3 kHz together could make the band unusable for devices currently operating under Section 15.247. We are authorized to grant a waiver under Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules if the petitioner demonstrates good cause for such action. Good cause, in turn, may be found and a waiver granted ``where particular facts would make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest.'' To make this public interest determination, the waiver cannot undermine the purposes of the rule, and there must be a stronger public interest benefit
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-845A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-845A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-845A1.txt
    • be protected. Two parties request the inclusion of sites in the TV bands databases that were not listed in OET's public notice, and one party expresses concerns that the Commission's databases lack the necessary information to protect inputs for microwave links that receive over-the-air TV signals. DISCUSSION Grant of requested waivers We are authorized to grant a waiver under Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules if a petitioner demonstrates good cause for such action. Good cause, in turn, may be found and a waiver granted ``where particular facts would make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest.'' To make this public interest determination, the waiver cannot undermine the purposes of the rule, and there must be a stronger public interest benefit
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-84A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-84A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-84A1.txt
    • receipt of the submitted invoices. In remanding these applications to USAC, we make no finding as to the ultimate eligibility of the services requested or the petitioners' applications. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the requests for review or requests for waiver filed by the petitioners listed in the appendix ARE GRANTED and their underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Gina M. Spade Deputy Chief Telecommunications
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-855A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-855A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-855A1.txt
    • its receipt of the submitted documentation. In remanding these applications to USAC, we make no finding as to the ultimate eligibility of the services or the petitioners' applications. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the requests for review and for waiver and review filed by the petitioners listed in Appendix A ARE GRANTED and their underlying applications listed in Appendices A and B ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-85A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-85A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-85A1.txt
    • finding as to the ultimate eligibility of the services or of Loneman's application. At this time, there is no evidence of waste, fraud and abuse in the record. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the request for review or waiver filed by Loneman Day School, Ogala, South Dakota, IS GRANTED and the underlying application IS REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-863A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-863A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-863A1.txt
    • and are not required to use the eligibility criteria for the Lifeline program provided for in section 54.409(a) and (b) of the Commission's rules until April 1, 2013. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154, 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, that the request for waiver filed by USTelecom are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part to the extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154, 254,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-868A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-868A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-868A1.txt
    • Basis The legal basis for any action that may be taken pursuant to the Public Notice is contained in sections 1, 2, 4(i), 201-205, 214, 218-220, 254, 256, 303(r), and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 152, 154(i), 201-205, 214, 218-220, 251, 252, 254, 256, 303(r), and 403, and sections 0.91, 0l.201(d), 0.291, 1.3 and 1.427 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0l.201(d), 0.291, 1.3 and 1.4271. C. Description and Estimate of the Number of Small Entities to Which the Proposed Rules Will Apply The RFA directs agencies to provide a description of, and where feasible, an estimate of the number of small entities that may be affected by the proposed rules,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-870A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-870A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-870A1.txt
    • Federal Register. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Part 51 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. Parts 51.907, 51.909, 51.911, 51.915, and 51.917, are AMENDED as set forth in the Appendix, and such rule amendments shall be effective 30 days after the date of publication of the rule amendments in the Federal Register. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, sections 54.712, and 61.59 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 54.712, and 61.59(a) ARE WAIVED effective upon release of this Order for the limited purposes specified in this Order. , supra. .
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-894A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-894A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-894A1.txt
    • the release date of this order. In remanding these applications to USAC, we make no finding as to the ultimate eligibility of the services or the petitioners' applications. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the requests for review or requests for waiver listed in the appendix ARE GRANTED and those applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-895A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-895A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-895A1.txt
    • We direct USAC to continue its recovery actions against Milburn and its service provider, Lewis, for FRNs 1274644, 1274673, 1387671, 1387637, and 1387642 to the extent provided herein. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the request for review filed by Milburn Public Schools on June 24, 2010 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART to the extent provided herein, and the underlying funding request numbers 1274660 and 1274682 ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-899A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-899A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-899A1.txt
    • to the Commission a sworn affidavit agreeing to these conditions with documentation that demonstrates it will comply with them (such as an order form or receipt acknowledging that Baja has made an order for DTAs). This waiver will expire once Baja receives delivery of DTAs. Conclusion We conclude that limited, conditional grant of Baja's extension request is justified under Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's rules. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 76.7, the request for waiver of the second sentence of Section 76.1204(a)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 76.1204(a)(1), filed by Baja Broadband Operating Company, LLC, IS GRANTED to the extent described
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-915A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-915A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-915A1.txt
    • therefore direct USAC to discontinue recovery actions against Marconi and to instead seek recovery against HCS, if it is feasible to do so. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the request for waiver filed by Marconi Communications, Inc., on December 14, 2004 IS GRANTED and the underlying application IS REMANDED to USAC for further action consistent with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-917A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-917A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-917A1.txt
    • 47 C.F.R. � 54.706. See Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Sixteenth Order on Reconsideration, CC Docket No. 96-45, Eighth Report and Order, CC Docket No. 96-45, Sixth Report and Order, Docket No. 96-262, 15 FCC Rcd 1679, 1687-1692, paras. 17-29 (1999) (Fifth Circuit Remand Order). Generally, the Commission's rules may be waived for good cause shown. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). In addition, the Commission may take into account considerations of hardship, equity, or more effective implementation of overall policy on an individual basis.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-918A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-918A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-918A1.txt
    • to the duration of the contract with RLSA will ensure an appropriate limitation on the duration of the waiver. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 225, and 251(e), of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 154(j), 225, and 251(e), and sections 0.91, 0.141, 0.291, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.141, 0.291, 0.361, 1.3, that section 64.613(a)(4) of the Commission's rules is WAIVED as provided herein. or call the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau . FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Kris Anne Monteith Acting Chief Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau Sharon E. Gillett Chief Wireline Competition Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 64.613(a)(4). The current TRS
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-923A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-923A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-923A1.txt
    • of $40,104 per month, for a period of at least three months and up to six months or until the Bureau resolves WCC's Petition, whichever comes first. It is ORDERED pursuant to authority contained in sections 4(i), 4(j) and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 254, and sections 0.131, 0.331, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 0.331 and 1.3, and paragraph 544 of FCC 11-161, that USAC SHALL MAKE payment to Windy City Cellular, LLC in accordance with the amount, terms and conditions described herein. It is FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.103(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.103(a), this order SHALL BE effective upon
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-945A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-945A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-945A1.txt
    • a condition of the relief granted in this order, we require Eastex to file a revised 2011 interstate switched access revenue requirement as provided below. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154, 254, and pursuant to sections 0.291 and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.291 1.3, that sections 36.14, 36.191, 36.3, 36.123-126, 36-141, 36.152-157, and 36.372-382 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 36.14, 36.191, 36.3, 36.123-126, 36.141, 36.152-157, 36.372-382, 36.191, ARE WAIVED to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 408 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-957A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-957A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-957A1.txt
    • its receipt of the submitted invoices. In remanding these applications to USAC, we make no finding as to the ultimate eligibility of the services or the petitioners' applications. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the requests for waiver and review filed by Annunciation Elementary School and Hamilton County School District ARE GRANTED and their underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-962A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-962A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-962A1.txt
    • the release date of this order. In remanding these applications to USAC, we make no finding as to the ultimate eligibility of the services or the underlying applications. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the requests for review filed by Colorado Springs School District ARE GRANTED and the underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-973A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-973A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-973A1.txt
    • explain that MSG operates the Station. See WFI Opposition at 12. See, e.g., SSA at Section 3.3 - Control of Station (providing that ``MSG shall maintain ultimate control over the operations of [the Station], including, but not limited to, management, programming, finances, editorial policies, personnel, facilities and compliance with the Act, FCC Rules . . . .''). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See Columbia Communications Corp. v. FCC, 832 F.2d 189, 192 (D.C. Cir, 1987) (citing Rio Grande Family Radio Fellowship, Inc. v. FCC, 406 F.2d 644, 666 (D.C. Cir. 1968)). See WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (``WAIT Radio''), cited in Ownership Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 13647. See also Thomas Radio V. FCC, 716 F.2d
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-975A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-975A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-975A1.txt
    • to the wireline ETC, Verizon Washington, DC Inc., that new subscribers meet the income or program-based eligibility requirements of the Lifeline program and have executed a certification form. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154, 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, that section 54.410(d) is WAIVED to the limited extent provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon Gillett Chief See Lifeline and Link Up Reform and Modernization et al., Report and Order and Further Notice of Rulemaking, WC Dkt. Nos. 11-42 et al., CC Dkt. No. 96-45, FCC 12-11 (rel.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-984A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-984A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-984A1.txt
    • FOR CLASS WAIVER OF COMMISSION'S RULES FOR ACCESS TO ADVANCED COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES AND EQUIPMENT BY PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES CG Docket No. 10-213 Comments Due: July 23, 2012 Reply Comments Due: August 2, 2012 The National Cable & Telecommunications Association (NCTA), pursuant to section 716(h)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the Act), 47 U.S.C. � 617(h)(1), and sections 1.3 and 14.5 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 14.5, has filed a petition for a class waiver of the Commission's requirements for access to advanced communications services (ACS) and equipment by people with disabilities. NCTA seeks a waiver for set-top boxes leased by cable operators to their customers and manufactured before July 1, 2016. According to NCTA,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-985A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-985A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-985A1.txt
    • requests for waiver and/or review are listed in the Appendix. Section 54.719(c) of the Commission's rules provides that any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of USAC may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R. � 54.719(c). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720. The Commission may waive any provision of its rules for good cause shown. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). In addition, the Commission may take into account considerations of hardship, equity, or more effective implementation of overall policy on an individual basis.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-988A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-988A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-988A1.txt
    • access their services. We extend this waiver until July 1, 2013, or until the Commission addresses pending petitions regarding CPE portability, whichever comes first. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 151, 225, and 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 225, and 251(e), and sections 0.91, 0.141, 0.291, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.141, 0.291, 0.361, and 1.3, this ORDER IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for VRS, the waivers of the one-line VCO, VCO-to-TTY, and VCO-to-VCO; one-line HCO, HCO-to-TTY, and HCO-to-HCO; call release; pay-per-call (900) calls, types of calls, and equal access to interexchange carrier requirements are hereby extended for one year until
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-995A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-995A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-995A1.txt
    • forth in Appendix C of the HCLS Benchmarks Implementation Order. As requested, the information submitted included a certification by an officer of the company under penalty of perjury that the information provided accurately portrays the square mileage of West River's and Kennebec's respective study areas based on the most recent maps filed with the relevant state commissions. Pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, we find that special circumstances warrant waiver of the Commission's rules to revise the capex and opex benchmarks for West River and Kennebec that were listed in Appendix B of the HCLS Benchmarks Implementation Order. Using the corrected boundary information, Bureau staff modified the relevant geographic variables and calculated revised capex and opex benchmarks for West
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-95-1701A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-95-1701A1.txt
    • to modify its current interim authorization, which permits it to operate up to 30,000 data mobile earth terminals (METs) to provide land mobile-satellite service (LMSS).1 Its interim authorization permits the use of facili ties leased from Comsat and Inmarsat in the lower L-band (1530-1544/1626.5-1645.5 MHz).2 This modification applica tion requests authorization to shift the LMSS service to AMSC's own satellite, AMSC-1.3 2. We grant AMSC's application in part, subject to cer tain technical and operational conditions in keeping with prior Commission decisions. In conjunction with our ear lier authorization for AMSC to operate 200,000 voice II. BACKGROUND 3. In the Blanket Authorization, AMSC was authorized to operate 30,000 low data rate METs anywhere in the United States for domestic LMSS communications
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-96-1499A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-96-1499A1.txt
    • operations at 120 W.L. are temporary only and do not adversely impact operations of their satellites.10 Canada, however, requests that we require AT&T to move TELSTAR 303 to another location or take other appropriate action to ensure that it does not cause unacceptable interference, in the event Canada implements a C-band satellite at 118.7 W.L., which would place it only 1.3 away from TELSTAR 303. We are conditioning AT&T's authorization accordingly. We emphasize that the use of the 120 W.L. orbital position by a U.S. licensed satellite operator is temporary only and that this accommodation does not represent a modification of the U.S.-Mexico-Canada trilateral arrangement or a change in our policy in regards to it. 6. Therefore, we find that grant
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-96-1746A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-96-1746A1.txt
    • not provide for callers in Argentina to place WorldConnect calls destined to third countries. 4. Section 1.2 of the Agreement limits the availability of CDS service in Argentina to customers of AT&T who are temporarily in Argentina on business or pleasure. Similarly, it limits Argentina Directo service to Telintar customers temporarily in the United States on business or pleasure. Section 1.3 states that AT&T calling cards issued to U.S. expatriates residing in Argentina will have CDS service restricted to prevent them from placing CDS calls in Argentina. The section also provides that AT&T will not market its calling cards in Argentina. 5. Section 1.4 of the Agreement provides that AT&T's marketing of calling cards from Argentina and Telintar's marketing of calling
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-96-1748A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-96-1748A1.txt
    • 37 GTE Hawaii's international tariffed rates are "regionalized," i.e., GTE Hawaii offers the same rates, depending on the class of service, to all other countries within the same region. See GTE Hawaiian Telephone Company, Inc., Tariff F.C.C. No. 1, Section II.B.2.b.(4), Schedule 2, Region - Africa (including Nambia); GTE Hawaiian Telephone Company, Inc., Tariff F.C.C. No. 1, Section II.B.2.b., Schedule 1.3. Region - Europe (including Andorra). 38 See supra <[ 14. 39 GTE June 11. 1996. ex pane letter at 2. 20362 presubscription processes. Hawaiian customers cannot select GTE Hawaii as their international service provider when an end office is converted to equal access.40 17. This decline in market share, however, is also likely a result of competitors offering long distance
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-96-215A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-96-215A1.txt
    • Authorization, DA 96-214 (released February 22, 1996). 4 AMSC, as a CMRS provider, is not required to file a tariff for its domestic maritime mobile satellite service. AMSC stated that since its rates, terms, and conditions for both its domestic and international services would be similar, filing an international tariff would be a wasteful and unnecessary burden. 5 See, Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. 6 WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969). 10233 Federal Communications Commission DA 96-215 Conclusion 5. We grant the application of Cruisephone, Inc. to use mobile satellite facilities provided by AMSC to provide maritime mobile satellite service to ships within the service area of AMSC's system. Cruisephone will
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-96-713A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-96-713A1.txt
    • 19 20 78 26 28 10. We summarize our disposition of each application below. Separate opinions, with a full discussion of the merits and conditions of the licenses, will follow. We will afford licensees 30 days from the release of these individual opinions in which to file Petitions for Reconsideration or Applications for Review of our decisions today. 47 C.F.R. �1.3, �7.7060), and �7.775. AT&T: AT&T applied for authority to construct, launch, and operate three hybrid C-/Ku- band satellites, Telstars 5, 6, and 7. Telstar 5 is intended to be a partial replacement for the C-band Telstar 303 satellite, which is nearing retirement. AT&T also applied to construct a ground spare, Telstar 8. We grant AT&T authority for its Telstar 6
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-97-2435A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-97-2435A1.txt
    • Section 25.117(e) and grant EarthWatch's extension request. IV. Conclusion 11. Granting EarthWatch's application to modify its authorization to increase the bandwidth of its uplink TT&C channel and to extend the construction completion and launch milestone dates for the two satellites authorized in the EarthWatch Modification Order serves the 13 See 47 C.F.R. �25.117(e). 14 Id 15 See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (any provision of the rules may be waived by the Commission on its own motion if good cause is therefor shown). 16 See EarthWatch Request at 2. 17 See EarthWatch Modification Order 11 17. 19559 ____________ Federal Communications Commission_______DA 97-2435 public interest. V. Ordering Clauses 12. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, subject to the conditions set forth in this Order,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-97-958A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-97-958A1.txt
    • drift maneuver from that test location to its operating position of 174 East Longitude in the Pacific Ocean Region (POR). 1 COMSAT Corporation, 9 FCC Red 327 (1994) 6012 3. The estimated costs associated with the INTELSAT 802 satellite are as follows: Cost of Spacecraft Manufacture $ 83.2 millions (including delivery price, engineering changes and amendments) Launch Support Services $ 1.3 millions Performance Incentives, Capitalized $ 0.7 millions Performance Incentives, Expenses $ 6.2 millions Management Costs and Support Contracts $ 2.9 millions Ariane 44LP Launch Vehicle & Services $ 86.7 millions Launch phase and Post Separation Insurance $ 27.9 millions TOTAL INTELSAT cost $ 208.9 millions TOTAL COMSAT cost (based on current ownership share of 17.97%) $ -37.5 millions 4. The
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-99-3036A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-99-3036A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-99-3036A1.txt
    • / 418-2555 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 DA 99-3036 Tuesday, January 4, 2000 WAIVER OF THE SECTION 214 BENCHMARKS CONDITION Unless otherwise specified, the following procedures apply to the applications listed below: The applications listed below have been found, upon initial review, to be acceptable for filing pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. These applications shall not be deemed granted until the Commission affirmatively acts upon the application, either by public notice or by written order. Operation for which authorization is sought may not commence except in accordance with any terms or conditions imposed by the Commission. Unless otherwise specified, interested parties may file comments
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-99-633A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-99-633A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-99-633A1.txt
    • earth station registration (Call Sign E930437) from USSB to DIRECTV. We find, conditioned on service using the three DBS channels at 110o W.L. being implemented by December 31, 1999, that grant of this application is in the public interest and will allow DIRECTV to compete more effectively in multichannel video programming distribution ("MVPD") markets. Pursuant to our authority under Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, we also waive the due diligence requirement of Section 100.19(a) of the Rules and, therefore, dismiss USSB's application for additional time to construct and launch a DBS system using three channels at the 110o W.L. orbit location. II. Background USSB received its initial permit to construct and launch a DBS system in 1982. In 1990, the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-184137A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-184137A1.txt
    • DOBSON KNOB 11/17/1999 06256.54000 35-49-19.5 N NC NE 081-57-17.4 W 0000063090 Cellco Partnership DOBSON KNOB 11/17/1999 06256.54000 35-49-19.5 N NC NE 081-57-17.4 W 0000063090 Cellco Partnership DOBSON KNOB 11/17/1999 06315.84000 35-49-19.5 N NC NE 081-57-17.4 W 0000063090 Cellco Partnership DOBSON KNOB 11/17/1999 06315.84000 35-49-19.5 N NC NE 081-57-17.4 W 0000063090 Cellco Partnership DOBSON KNOB 11/17/1999 06375.14000 35-49-19.5 N SC NE 081-14-01.3 W 0000063093 Cellco Partnership YORK 11/18/1999 06197.24000 34-57-53.5 N SC NE 081-14-01.3 W 0000063093 Cellco Partnership YORK 11/18/1999 06256.54000 34-57-53.5 N SC NE 081-14-01.3 W 0000063093 Cellco Partnership YORK 11/18/1999 06256.54000 34-57-53.5 N SC NE 081-14-01.3 W 0000063093 Cellco Partnership YORK 11/18/1999 06315.84000 34-57-53.5 N SC NE 081-14-01.3 W 0000063093 Cellco Partnership YORK 11/18/1999 06315.84000 34-57-53.5 N SC NE 081-14-01.3
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202023A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202023A1.txt
    • NE 114-36-49.8 W 0000106472 Yuma, Arizona RSA Limited PartnershipYuma 04/11/2000 10583.12500 32-41-41.2 N NY NE 073-51-49.5 W 0000107183 BACKLINK LLC Flushing 04/12/2000 22475.00000 40-43-52.0 N NY NE 073-51-49.0 W 0000107184 BACKLINK LLC Corona 04/12/2000 22425.00000 40-44-05.8 N NY NE 073-51-30.3 W 0000107185 BACKLINK LLC Rego Park 04/12/2000 22575.00000 40-43-45.0 N NY NE 073-52-09.7 W 0000107186 BACKLINK LLC Flushing 04/12/2000 22525.00000 40-44-01.3 N NY NE 073-51-52.1 W 0000107187 BACKLINK LLC Flushing 04/12/2000 21225.00000 40-44-05.3 N Page 23 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NY NE 073-51-52.1 W 0000107187 BACKLINK LLC Flushing 04/12/2000 21275.00000 40-44-05.3 N NY NE 073-51-52.1 W 0000107187 BACKLINK LLC
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202342A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202342A1.txt
    • W 0000115041 TEXAS EASTERN COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Gladeville 04/24/2000 00952.25625 36-09-14.0 N OK NE 097-35-07.0 W 0000115043 Duke Energy Field Services Assets LLCCOUNTY LINE 04/24/2000 00928.31875 34-29-58.0 N OK NE 097-35-07.0 W 0000115043 Duke Energy Field Services Assets LLCCOUNTY LINE 04/24/2000 00952.31875 34-29-58.0 N NC NE P 080-33-06.0 W 0000116428 UNION COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS MONROE 04/20/2000 00956.40625 34-59-03.0 N NV NE 117-23-01.3 W 0000116585 Sierra Pacific Power Company Goldfield 04/25/2000 00932.30625 37-42-03.8 N NV NE 117-23-01.3 W 0000116585 Sierra Pacific Power Company Goldfield 04/25/2000 00941.30625 37-42-03.8 N NV NE 116-41-19.3 W 0000116586 Sierra Pacific Power Company Battle Mountain 04/25/2000 00932.29375 40-37-17.7 N NV NE 116-41-19.3 W 0000116586 Sierra Pacific Power Company Battle Mountain 04/25/2000 00941.29375 40-37-17.7 N NV NE 118-45-10.5 W 0000116595
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202481A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202481A1.txt
    • 084-21-06.7 W 0000119008 BACKLINK, L.L.C. Atlanta 05/01/2000 22775.00000 33-56-00.9 N GA MD WPOL700 084-20-43.0 W 0000119009 BACKLINK, L.L.C. Atlanta 05/01/2000 17840.00000 33-55-54.0 N GA MD WPOL700 084-20-43.0 W 0000119009 BACKLINK, L.L.C. Atlanta 05/01/2000 18040.00000 33-55-54.0 N GA MD WPOL700 084-20-43.0 W 0000119009 BACKLINK, L.L.C. Atlanta 05/01/2000 21625.00000 33-55-54.0 N MI MD WPOL476 083-03-01.6 W 0000119077 BACKLINK, L.L.C. Detroit 05/01/2000 19680.00000 42-20-01.3 N MI MD WPOL476 083-03-01.6 W 0000119077 BACKLINK, L.L.C. Detroit 05/01/2000 21275.00000 42-20-01.3 N MI MD WPOL476 083-03-01.6 W 0000119077 BACKLINK, L.L.C. Detroit 05/01/2000 21375.00000 42-20-01.3 N MI MD WPOL476 083-03-01.6 W 0000119077 BACKLINK, L.L.C. Detroit 05/01/2000 21475.00000 42-20-01.3 N MI MD WPOL476 083-03-01.6 W 0000119077 BACKLINK, L.L.C. Detroit 05/01/2000 21575.00000 42-20-01.3 N MI MD WPOL476 083-03-01.6 W 0000119077 BACKLINK,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202671A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202671A1.txt
    • 122-35-41.0 W 0000126692 WirelessCo, L.P. PETALUMA 05/10/2000 19265.00000 38-10-57.0 N ID NE 116-12-02.0 W 0000128105 AT&T Wireless Services of Florida, Inc. Boise 05/11/2000 17840.00000 43-36-57.0 N ID NE 116-54-55.0 W 0000128120 AT&T Wireless Services of Florida, Inc. Moscow 05/11/2000 06840.00000 46-48-41.0 N ID NE 117-00-11.0 W 0000128123 AT&T Wireless Services of Florida, Inc. Moscow 05/11/2000 06680.00000 46-44-56.0 N CA NE 118-21-01.3 W 0000128150 Cox Communication PCS, LP Pinteree 05/11/2000 19365.00000 34-27-49.0 N CA NE 118-22-53.3 W 0000128162 Cox Communication PCS, LP Vasquez Rocks 05/11/2000 17805.00000 34-26-53.0 N NM NE 106-40-59.1 W 0000128182 U S WEST Communications, Inc. ALBUQUERQUE 05/11/2000 19600.00000 35-01-48.2 N Page 10 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202973A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202973A1.txt
    • 117-09-37.2 W 0000140355 BACKLINK LLC San Diego 05/25/2000 18000.00000 32-43-04.7 N CA NE 117-09-44.0 W 0000140356 BACKLINK LLC San Diego 05/25/2000 17880.00000 32-43-05.4 N NJ NE 074-02-05.9 W 0000140359 BACKLINK LLC JERSEY CITY 05/25/2000 18080.00000 40-42-58.2 N NJ NE 074-02-32.0 W 0000140360 BACKLINK LLC JERSEY CITY 05/25/2000 19640.00000 40-43-07.5 N MN NE 093-20-44.5 W 0000140364 KATLINK LLC MINNEAPOLIS 05/25/2000 19360.00000 44-58-01.3 N MN NE 093-20-44.5 W 0000140364 KATLINK LLC MINNEAPOLIS 05/25/2000 19360.00000 44-58-01.3 N MN NE 093-20-44.5 W 0000140364 KATLINK LLC MINNEAPOLIS 05/25/2000 19360.00000 44-58-01.3 N MN NE 093-20-44.5 W 0000140364 KATLINK LLC MINNEAPOLIS 05/25/2000 19400.00000 44-58-01.3 N Page 29 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203279A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203279A1.txt
    • WMN432 086-17-40.9 W 0000159001 KENTUCKY RSA #3 CELLULAR GENERAL PARTNERSHIP LEITCHFIELD 06/07/2000 02165.20000 37-27-33.1 N KY MD WMN428 086-39-01.9 W 0000159003 KENTUCKY RSA #3 CELLULAR GENERAL PARTNERSHIP MORGANTOWN 06/07/2000 02162.00000 37-08-47.1 N KY MD WMN433 086-19-50.9 W 0000159004 KENTUCKY RSA #3 CELLULAR GENERAL PARTNERSHIP GARFIELD 06/07/2000 02124.80000 37-47-53.2 N OR MD WPON434 122-39-37.9 W 0000160295 BACKLINK LLC PORTLAND 06/08/2000 17760.00000 45-31-01.3 N OR MD WPON434 122-39-37.9 W 0000160295 BACKLINK LLC PORTLAND 06/08/2000 17800.00000 45-31-01.3 N OR MD WPON434 122-39-37.9 W 0000160295 BACKLINK LLC PORTLAND 06/08/2000 17840.00000 45-31-01.3 N OR MD WPON434 122-39-37.9 W 0000160295 BACKLINK LLC PORTLAND 06/08/2000 17880.00000 45-31-01.3 N OR MD WPON434 122-39-37.9 W 0000160295 BACKLINK LLC PORTLAND 06/08/2000 17920.00000 45-31-01.3 N OR MD WPON434 122-39-37.9 W 0000160295 BACKLINK
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203818A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203818A1.txt
    • ME MD WLI900 070-16-33.9 W 0000177376 MAINE PUBLIC BROADCASTING CORPORATION LEWISTON 06/27/2000 06887.50000 44-07-26.9 N ME MD WHS246 070-00-35.0 W 0000177391 MAINE PUBLIC BROADCASTING CORPORATION LITCHFIELD 06/27/2000 07112.50000 44-09-15.0 N WA MD WLE251 122-18-30.0 W 0000178956 KCPQ INC SEATTLE 06/28/2000 07087.50000 47-36-56.0 N PA NE 075-12-52.6 W 0000176491 Paxson Philadelphia License, Inc. Bala Cynwyd 06/26/2000 06912.50000 40-00-26.4 N CA NE 118-20-01.3 W 0000176601 World Television Los Angeles 06/26/2000 12975.00000 - 13000.00000 34-05-28.0 N TN NE 086-15-38.0 W 0000177414 Paxson Communications License Company, LLC Gallatin 06/27/2000 06887.50000 36-25-08.0 N TN NE 086-30-40.0 W 0000177425 Paxson Communications License Company, LLC Mt. Juliet 06/27/2000 07012.50000 36-11-26.4 N CA NE 118-20-01.3 W 0000177842 World Television Los Angeles 06/27/2000 12975.00000 - 13000.00000 34-05-28.0 N Page 83
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203906A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203906A1.txt
    • 800KG7D QPSK DIGITAL DATA SERVICE 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 800KG7D Points of Communication: VSAPRO4A - ALSAT - (ALSAT) E000290 SES-LIC-20000613-00960 VISA INTERNATIONAL SERVICE ASSOCIATION Application for Authority Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service Applicant seeks authorization to use Panamsat 3. 18 � 22 ' 48.80 " N LAT. SITE ID: VSAPRO1X CARRETERA 176 KM 1.3 CUPEY CENTER, RIO PIEDRAS, PR 66 � 3 ' 16.60 " W LONG. LOCATION: PRODELIN 1 2.4 meters ANTENNA ID: 1251 45.10 dBW QPSK DIGITAL DATA SERVICE 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 800KG7D QPSK DIGITAL DATA SERVICE 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 800KG7D Points of Communication: VSAPRO1X - ALSAT - (ALSAT) Page 6 of 22 E000291 SES-LIC-20000613-00961 VISA INTERNATIONAL SERVICE ASSOCIATION Application
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203907A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203907A1.txt
    • 0000168745 KATLINK LLC Ann Arbor 06/19/2000 19520.00000 42-16-52.0 N MO NE 094-34-58.4 W 0000168747 KATLINK LLC KANSAS CITY 06/19/2000 22475.00000 39-05-26.2 N WA NE 122-20-02.0 W 0000168783 BACKLINK LLC SEATTLE 06/19/2000 19400.00000 47-35-55.1 N WA NE 122-19-54.7 W 0000168784 BACKLINK LLC SEATTLE 06/19/2000 19680.00000 47-36-21.2 N WA NE 122-20-33.5 W 0000168785 BACKLINK LLC SEATTLE 06/19/2000 19520.00000 47-36-49.1 N WA NE 122-20-01.3 W 0000168786 BACKLINK LLC SEATTLE 06/19/2000 19560.00000 47-35-41.5 N WA NE 122-19-21.3 W 0000168787 BACKLINK LLC SEATTLE 06/19/2000 17800.00000 47-36-39.7 N WA NE 122-19-21.3 W 0000168787 BACKLINK LLC SEATTLE 06/19/2000 17840.00000 47-36-39.7 N WA NE 122-19-21.3 W 0000168787 BACKLINK LLC SEATTLE 06/19/2000 17880.00000 47-36-39.7 N Page 17 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-204064A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-204064A1.txt
    • Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA NE 121-56-47.1 W 0000187300 BACKLINK LLC FREMONT 07/12/2000 18080.00000 37-29-20.1 N CA NE 121-56-09.9 W 0000187301 BACKLINK LLC FREMONT 07/12/2000 19400.00000 37-28-13.8 N CA NE 121-55-43.0 W 0000187302 BACKLINK LLC Fremont 07/12/2000 19320.00000 37-28-12.1 N CA NE 121-55-44.7 W 0000187303 BACKLINK LLC FREMONT 07/12/2000 19560.00000 37-28-15.3 N CA NE 121-59-01.3 W 0000187304 BACKLINK LLC FREMONT 07/12/2000 19640.00000 37-29-52.5 N CA NE 117-12-55.1 W 0000187306 BACKLINK LLC SAN DIEGO 07/12/2000 17880.00000 32-52-32.1 N CA NE 117-12-55.1 W 0000187306 BACKLINK LLC SAN DIEGO 07/12/2000 18000.00000 32-52-32.1 N CA NE 117-12-39.3 W 0000187307 BACKLINK LLC SAN DIEGO 07/12/2000 19440.00000 32-52-34.7 N CA NE 117-12-47.6 W 0000187308 BACKLINK LLC SAN DIEGO 07/12/2000 19560.00000 32-52-32.4
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-204402A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-204402A1.txt
    • #6 - High School Heber 07/18/2000 21925.00000 34-25-43.1 N AZ AM 110-35-44.0 W 0000100247 Heber Overgaard Unified School District #6 - High School Heber 07/18/2000 23125.00000 34-25-43.1 N CA AM 121-22-26.8 W 0000160428 TRANSMISSION AGENCY OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA Patterson 07/17/2000 06715.00000 37-30-26.8 N CA AM 121-22-26.8 W 0000160428 TRANSMISSION AGENCY OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA Patterson 07/17/2000 06805.00000 37-30-26.8 N AK AM 146-50-01.3 W 0000165383 ALYESKA PIPELINE SERVICE COMPANY AGENT 30 Mi. S. of Valdez 07/21/2000 06541.25000 60-50-46.1 N IN AM WGX813 085-08-18.0 W 0000179203 INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY dba AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER FORT WAYNE 07/20/2000 06197.24000 41-04-40.0 N Page 31 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-204800A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-204800A1.txt
    • 0000197397 MICHIGAN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY 07/31/2000 RO KVI34 0000197865 BROADWING INC 08/01/2000 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TX MD KNKN665 094-21-24.7 W 0000198001 WWC Texas RSA Limited Partnership Linden 08/01/2000 32-58-34.5 N MO MD KNKN825 092-00-59.6 W 0000198716 MISSOURI RSA 11/12 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP DUKE 08/01/2000 37-50-01.3 N SD MD KNKN272 098-14-58.7 W 0000199065 WWC License LLC Woonsocket 08/02/2000 44-02-26.3 N CO MD KNKR307 102-15-14.6 W 0000200150 N.E. COLORADO CELLULAR, INC. Stuart 08/03/2000 38-23-51.4 N CO MD KNKR307 102-04-15.6 W 0000200150 N.E. COLORADO CELLULAR, INC. Towner 08/03/2000 38-31-21.0 N AK MD KNKQ402 148-20-04.0 W 0000200535 AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES OF ALASKA, INC. Chickaloon 08/04/2000 61-48-25.0 N GA NE
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-205248A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-205248A1.txt
    • 0000165243 Pacific Bell Wireless, LLC TEHACHAPI 08/16/2000 19385.00000 35-06-39.7 N CA AM WPON572 118-10-14.6 W 0000165265 Pacific Bell Wireless, LLC MOJAVE 08/16/2000 17825.00000 35-03-18.9 N MI AM 083-02-54.9 W 0000165268 BACKLINK LLC DEROIT 08/16/2000 17760.00000 42-19-46.6 N MI AM 083-02-54.9 W 0000165268 BACKLINK LLC DEROIT 08/16/2000 18080.00000 42-19-46.6 N MI AM WPOL476 083-03-01.6 W 0000165269 BACKLINK, L.L.C. Detroit 08/16/2000 19320.00000 42-20-01.3 N Page 4 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MI AM WPOL476 083-03-01.6 W 0000165269 BACKLINK, L.L.C. Detroit 08/16/2000 19640.00000 42-20-01.3 N MI AM WPOL476 083-03-01.6 W 0000165269 BACKLINK, L.L.C. Detroit 08/16/2000 21275.00000 42-20-01.3 N MI AM WPOL476 083-03-01.6 W
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-205412A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-205412A1.txt
    • LLC Los Angeles 08/24/2000 17960.00000 34-02-44.9 N CA NE 118-15-21.9 W 0000210330 BACKLINK LLC Los Angeles 08/24/2000 17840.00000 34-02-51.2 N TX NE 096-52-21.0 W 0000210335 MCI WORLDCOM Network Services, Inc.DALLAS 08/24/2000 18807.50000 32-49-50.5 N NY NE 074-00-11.8 W 0000210341 BACKLINK LLC New York 08/24/2000 19680.00000 40-43-04.8 N MA NE 071-04-26.6 W 0000210361 Teligent License Company II, L.L.C. Boston 08/24/2000 17960.00000 42-21-01.3 N MA NE 071-03-53.6 W 0000210367 Teligent License Company II, L.L.C. BOSTON 08/24/2000 17840.00000 42-20-33.8 N MA NE 071-03-37.3 W 0000210500 BACKLINK LLC Charlestown 08/24/2000 19640.00000 42-22-56.4 N MA NE 070-56-38.3 W 0000210510 BACKLINK LLC Lynn 08/24/2000 19560.00000 42-28-02.2 N MA NE 070-56-38.3 W 0000210510 BACKLINK LLC Lynn 08/24/2000 19680.00000 42-28-02.2 N MA NE 070-56-58.2 W 0000210511 BACKLINK LLC Lynn
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-205600A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-205600A1.txt
    • of Tennessee IncorporatedFLINTVILLE 08/28/2000 35-05-42.3 N TN RM KNKN742 086-25-34.0 W 0000211173 GTE Mobilnet of Tennessee IncorporatedFOSTERVILLE 08/28/2000 35-37-13.3 N TN RM KNKN742 086-52-45.0 W 0000211173 GTE Mobilnet of Tennessee IncorporatedFRANKEWING 08/28/2000 35-11-34.3 N TN RM KNKN742 086-45-41.0 W 0000211173 GTE Mobilnet of Tennessee IncorporatedLEWISBURG 08/28/2000 35-23-05.3 N TN RM KNKN742 086-52-57.0 W 0000211173 GTE Mobilnet of Tennessee IncorporatedLEWISBURG 08/28/2000 35-24-01.3 N TN RM KNKN742 086-21-36.5 W 0000211173 GTE Mobilnet of Tennessee IncorporatedLynchburg 08/28/2000 35-16-32.3 N TN RM KNKN742 066-36-49.0 W 0000211173 GTE Mobilnet of Tennessee IncorporatedPark City 08/28/2000 35-05-20.0 N Page 49 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TN RM KNKN742 087-01-04.0 W 0000211173 GTE Mobilnet
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-205915A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-205915A1.txt
    • 42-45-09.9 N IA RM KNKN315 095-36-14.0 W 0000216907 CELLULAR INC. NETWORK CORPORATION Cherokee 09/11/2000 42-45-26.9 N IA RM KNKN315 096-06-42.1 W 0000216907 CELLULAR INC. NETWORK CORPORATION LE MARS 09/11/2000 42-50-15.0 N IA RM KNKN315 096-12-52.0 W 0000216907 CELLULAR INC. NETWORK CORPORATION Merrill 09/11/2000 42-42-25.0 N NY RM KNKQ273 077-48-14.0 W 0000216919 NEW YORK RSA NO. 3 CELLULAR PARTNERSHIP ALFRED 09/11/2000 42-14-01.3 N NY RM KNKQ273 078-25-50.1 W 0000216919 NEW YORK RSA NO. 3 CELLULAR PARTNERSHIP Arcade 09/11/2000 42-30-12.2 N NY RM KNKQ273 079-14-18.2 W 0000216919 NEW YORK RSA NO. 3 CELLULAR PARTNERSHIP ARKWRIGHT 09/11/2000 42-24-51.2 N NY RM KNKQ273 078-17-05.0 W 0000216919 NEW YORK RSA NO. 3 CELLULAR PARTNERSHIP ATTICA 09/11/2000 42-51-48.1 N NY RM KNKQ273 077-25-59.0 W 0000216919 NEW YORK
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206274A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206274A1.txt
    • KNKN964 084-47-12.8 W 0000226563 KENTUCKY CGSA, INC. BELLSOUTH MOBILITY INC. Danville 09/27/2000 37-38-52.3 N KY RM KNKN964 084-55-39.8 W 0000226563 KENTUCKY CGSA, INC. BELLSOUTH MOBILITY INC. Liberty 09/27/2000 37-18-37.3 N KY RM KNKN964 084-33-28.8 W 0000226563 KENTUCKY CGSA, INC. BELLSOUTH MOBILITY INC. NICHOLASVILLE 09/27/2000 37-55-48.3 N KY RM KNKN964 084-16-42.8 W 0000226563 KENTUCKY CGSA, INC. BELLSOUTH MOBILITY INC. RICHMOND 09/27/2000 37-43-01.3 N Page 54 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City KY RM KNKN964 084-19-32.8 W 0000226563 KENTUCKY CGSA, INC. BELLSOUTH MOBILITY INC. RICHMOND 09/27/2000 37-52-45.3 N KY RM KNKN964 084-19-32.8 W 0000226563 KENTUCKY CGSA, INC. BELLSOUTH MOBILITY INC. RICHMOND 09/27/2000 37-52-45.3 N KY RM KNKN964 084-41-32.8 W
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206369A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206369A1.txt
    • PARTNERSHIP FARMINGTON 10/05/2000 11075.00000 37-56-26.7 N CA MD WMS320 118-20-51.2 W 0000234330 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP LOS ANGELES 10/05/2000 19595.00000 34-03-46.0 N CA MD WMS320 118-20-51.2 W 0000234330 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP LOS ANGELES 10/05/2000 19615.00000 34-03-46.0 N CA MD WMS326 118-22-48.3 W 0000234332 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP WEST HOLLYWOOD 10/05/2000 18035.00000 34-05-13.2 N CA MD WPJC596 118-24-01.3 W 0000234333 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP BEVERLY HILLS 10/05/2000 18055.00000 34-04-05.0 N Page 14 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA MD WMW989 118-27-40.3 W 0000234334 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP SANTA MONICA 10/05/2000 18045.00000 34-01-25.0 N CA MD
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206584A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206584A1.txt
    • - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City DE AM 075-40-29.1 W 0000218142 BACKLINK LLC NEWARK 10/13/2000 21225.00000 39-40-07.3 N DE AM 075-40-29.1 W 0000218142 BACKLINK LLC NEWARK 10/13/2000 21375.00000 39-40-07.3 N OR AM WPON434 122-39-37.9 W 0000223765 BACKLINK LLC PORTLAND 10/12/2000 17760.00000 45-31-01.3 N OR AM WPON434 122-39-37.9 W 0000223765 BACKLINK LLC PORTLAND 10/12/2000 17920.00000 45-31-01.3 N OR AM WPON434 122-39-37.9 W 0000223765 BACKLINK LLC PORTLAND 10/12/2000 18080.00000 45-31-01.3 N OR AM WPON434 122-39-37.9 W 0000223765 BACKLINK LLC PORTLAND 10/12/2000 18120.00000 45-31-01.3 N AZ AM KPV76 112-33-35.6 W 0000226042 CNG COMMUNICATIONS, INC. PERRYVILLE 10/11/2000 03730.00000 33-34-10.1 N AZ AM KPV76 112-33-35.6 W 0000226042
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206771A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206771A1.txt
    • Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City PA AM KGC59 075-34-15.7 W 0000209711 PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE COMMISSION Lionville 10/17/2000 06795.00000 40-04-13.3 N PA AM KGC59 075-34-15.7 W 0000209711 PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE COMMISSION Lionville 10/17/2000 06795.00000 40-04-13.3 N PA AM KGC59 075-34-15.7 W 0000209711 PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE COMMISSION Lionville 10/17/2000 06825.00000 40-04-13.3 N PA AM KGC61 075-51-59.7 W 0000209712 PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE COMMISSION Morgantown 10/17/2000 06585.00000 40-08-01.3 N PA AM KGC61 075-51-59.7 W 0000209712 PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE COMMISSION Morgantown 10/17/2000 06605.00000 40-08-01.3 N PA AM KGC61 075-51-59.7 W 0000209712 PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE COMMISSION Morgantown 10/17/2000 06635.00000 40-08-01.3 N PA AM KGC61 075-51-59.7 W 0000209712 PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE COMMISSION Morgantown 10/17/2000 06665.00000 40-08-01.3 N PA AM KGC61 075-51-59.7 W 0000209712 PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE COMMISSION Morgantown 10/17/2000 06685.00000 40-08-01.3 N PA AM KGC62
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206940A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206940A1.txt
    • HI RM WPIW606 155-10-57.0 W 0000244956 PAGEMART II INC NINOLE 09/08/2000 00929.71250 19-54-44.0 N TX RM WPIW606 102-28-09.5 W 0000244956 PAGEMART II INC ODESSA 09/08/2000 00929.71250 31-50-42.5 N MN RM WPIW606 093-05-42.8 W 0000244956 PAGEMART II INC ST PAUL 09/08/2000 00929.71250 44-56-53.9 N NY RM WPIQ562 076-47-00.8 W 0000245061 PAGEMART II INC ASHLAND 09/08/2000 00929.71250 42-01-55.3 N IL RM WPIQ562 089-13-01.3 W 0000245061 PAGEMART II INC CARBONDALE 09/08/2000 00929.71250 37-43-45.2 N MN RM WPIQ562 093-34-18.9 W 0000245061 PAGEMART II INC ELK RIVER 09/08/2000 00929.71250 45-20-34.9 N KS RM WPIQ562 094-57-42.9 W 0000245061 PAGEMART II INC LEAVENWORTH 09/08/2000 00929.71250 39-19-01.0 N Page 26 GS - Private Carrier Paging, 929-930 MHz State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207245A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207245A1.txt
    • 079-59-41.7 W 0000222915 KATLINK LLC PITTSBURGH 10/30/2000 18040.00000 40-26-29.0 N PA AM WPQR735 079-59-41.7 W 0000222915 KATLINK LLC PITTSBURGH 10/30/2000 18080.00000 40-26-29.0 N PA AM WPQR735 079-59-41.7 W 0000222915 KATLINK LLC PITTSBURGH 10/30/2000 18120.00000 40-26-29.0 N PA AM WPQR735 079-59-41.7 W 0000222915 KATLINK LLC PITTSBURGH 10/30/2000 18120.00000 40-26-29.0 N OR AM WPON434 122-39-37.9 W 0000223765 BACKLINK LLC PORTLAND 11/02/2000 17760.00000 45-31-01.3 N OR AM WPON434 122-39-37.9 W 0000223765 BACKLINK LLC PORTLAND 11/02/2000 17840.00000 45-31-01.3 N OR AM WPON434 122-39-37.9 W 0000223765 BACKLINK LLC PORTLAND 11/02/2000 17920.00000 45-31-01.3 N OR AM WPON434 122-39-37.9 W 0000223765 BACKLINK LLC PORTLAND 11/02/2000 18080.00000 45-31-01.3 N OR AM WPON434 122-39-37.9 W 0000223765 BACKLINK LLC PORTLAND 11/02/2000 18120.00000 45-31-01.3 N AZ AM WPOT950 111-24-32.5 W 0000225320 CNG
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207700A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207700A1.txt
    • NOBLE 11/15/2000 06093.45000 35-08-47.0 N OK NE 097-24-11.0 W 0000262554 Western Farmers Electric Cooperative NOBLE 11/15/2000 06740.62500 35-08-47.0 N OK NE 097-24-11.0 W 0000262554 Western Farmers Electric Cooperative NOBLE 11/15/2000 06775.00000 35-08-47.0 N OK NE 097-23-49.0 W 0000262570 Western Farmers Electric Cooperative OKLAHOMA CITY 11/15/2000 06560.62500 35-18-17.0 N OK NE 096-59-54.1 W 0000262577 Western Farmers Electric Cooperative Shawnee 11/15/2000 06805.00000 35-24-01.3 N OK NE 096-59-54.1 W 0000262577 Western Farmers Electric Cooperative Shawnee 11/15/2000 06825.00000 35-24-01.3 N OK NE 095-47-18.0 W 0000262595 Western Farmers Electric Cooperative CHECOTAH 11/15/2000 06745.00000 35-26-03.0 N OK NE 096-40-24.1 W 0000262598 Western Farmers Electric Cooperative Seminole 11/15/2000 06665.00000 35-22-50.3 N OK NE 096-40-24.1 W 0000262598 Western Farmers Electric Cooperative Seminole 11/15/2000 06765.00000 35-22-50.3 N OK NE 098-13-27.2
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208209A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208209A1.txt
    • Chicago 12/06/2000 23125.00000 41-52-57.1 N IL NE 087-38-14.2 W 0000285671 Winstar Wireless Fiber Corp. Chicago 12/06/2000 23275.00000 41-52-57.1 N MN NE 093-23-55.8 W 0000285832 KATLINK LLC S. Edina 12/07/2000 19560.00000 44-52-38.2 N MN NE 093-24-21.5 W 0000285833 KATLINK LLC S. Edina 12/07/2000 19640.00000 44-53-50.4 N MN NE 093-25-03.2 W 0000285834 KATLINK LLC Eden Prairie 12/07/2000 19360.00000 44-53-06.4 N MN NE 093-25-01.3 W 0000285835 KATLINK LLC Eden Prairie 12/07/2000 19480.00000 44-53-02.4 N MN NE 093-24-21.5 W 0000285836 KATLINK LLC S. Edina 12/07/2000 17800.00000 44-53-50.4 N MN NE 093-24-21.5 W 0000285836 KATLINK LLC S. Edina 12/07/2000 17920.00000 44-53-50.4 N MN NE 093-24-21.5 W 0000285836 KATLINK LLC S. Edina 12/07/2000 18000.00000 44-53-50.4 N Page 27 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208287A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208287A1.txt
    • the close of business 30 days from the date of this notice. See 47 C.F.R. Section 21.30. MDS MAJOR MODIFICATION APPLICATIONS ACCEPTED FOR FILING Report No. 151 Released: 12/14/00 File Number Applicant Channel(s) Station City & State BMPMD-20000809AAC APPLIED VIDEO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. FG DOTHAN, AL Call Sign KNSC206 (303208) Lat. 31 15 8 N. - Lon. 85 17 12 W. 1.3 MILES WEST OF HIGHWAY 52, DOTHAN, AL Antenna C/L RCAMSL 548.60 meters New Station Change Transmitter Emission Type BTA: 115 Dothan, AL LEAD CALLSIGN: KNSC206 File Number Applicant Channel(s) Station City & State BMPMD-20000810AAE BONNIE D. O'CONNELL EG VIDALIA, GA Call Sign WMY295 (301681) Lat. 32 12 20 N. - Lon. 82 29 39 W. 1600 NW INT. HWY 280/OLD,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208701A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208701A1.txt
    • KEILER 12/28/2000 01935.00000 42-31-24.0 N WI MD WEG341 090-37-00.4 W 0000309168 DAIRYLAND POWER COOP KEILER 12/28/2000 01945.00000 42-31-24.0 N CA NE 119-03-59.3 W 0000226521 COMMUNICATION SERVICES POINT MUGU 09/18/2000 18145.00000 - 18577.00000 34-06-31.0 N ID NE P 116-14-41.0 W 0000306556 UNITED WATER IDAHO, INC. BOISE 12/26/2000 00956.29375 43-33-46.0 N MA NE 072-24-41.3 W 0000307460 EPEC COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION Wilbraham 12/27/2000 00928.65625 42-07-01.3 N MA NE 072-24-41.3 W 0000307460 EPEC COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION Wilbraham 12/27/2000 00952.65625 42-07-01.3 N TN NE 087-46-47.0 W 0000307564 EPEC COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION LOBELVILLE 12/27/2000 00928.01875 35-46-50.0 N TN NE 087-46-47.0 W 0000307564 EPEC COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION LOBELVILLE 12/27/2000 00952.01875 35-46-50.0 N WA NE 117-23-18.7 W 0000307661 Avista Corporation SPOKANE 12/27/2000 06555.00000 47-40-24.6 N WA NE 117-23-18.7 W 0000307661 Avista Corporation SPOKANE
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208868A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208868A1.txt
    • INC NIMROD 01/04/2001 06845.00000 46-39-34.8 N OK AM 097-24-11.0 W 0000262554 Western Farmers Electric Cooperative NOBLE 01/04/2001 06093.45000 35-08-47.0 N OK AM 097-24-11.0 W 0000262554 Western Farmers Electric Cooperative NOBLE 01/04/2001 06740.62500 35-08-47.0 N OK AM 097-24-11.0 W 0000262554 Western Farmers Electric Cooperative NOBLE 01/04/2001 06775.00000 35-08-47.0 N OK AM 096-59-54.1 W 0000262577 Western Farmers Electric Cooperative Shawnee 01/04/2001 06805.00000 35-24-01.3 N OK AM 096-59-54.1 W 0000262577 Western Farmers Electric Cooperative Shawnee 01/04/2001 06825.00000 35-24-01.3 N AL AM WNTG663 088-02-33.9 W 0000285871 ALABAMA POWER COMPANY MOBILE 01/04/2001 00928.40625 30-41-41.6 N AL AM WNTG663 088-02-33.9 W 0000285871 ALABAMA POWER COMPANY MOBILE 01/04/2001 00928.65625 30-41-41.6 N AL AM WNTG663 088-02-33.9 W 0000285871 ALABAMA POWER COMPANY MOBILE 01/04/2001 00952.40625 30-41-41.6 N AL AM WNTG663
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209092A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209092A1.txt
    • 39850.00000 - 39900.00000 42-09-27.3 N OR RM WPJA903 R 122-16-52.2 W 0000322222 BIZTEL, INC. (C/O AT&T CORP) SALEM 01/12/2001 38750.00000 - 38800.00000 44-26-26.4 N OR RM WPJA903 R 122-16-52.2 W 0000322222 BIZTEL, INC. (C/O AT&T CORP) SALEM 01/12/2001 39450.00000 - 39500.00000 44-26-26.4 N FL RM WMT623 R 080-03-44.1 W 0000322252 BIZTEL, INC. (C/O AT&T CORP) MIAMI 01/12/2001 39200.00000 - 39250.00000 25-30-01.3 N FL RM WMT623 R 080-03-44.1 W 0000322252 BIZTEL, INC. (C/O AT&T CORP) MIAMI 01/12/2001 39900.00000 - 39950.00000 25-30-01.3 N WI RM WMT636 R 087-37-30.2 W 0000322262 BIZTEL, INC. (C/O AT&T CORP) MILWAUKEE 01/12/2001 39200.00000 - 39250.00000 42-30-00.0 N WI RM WMT636 R 087-37-30.2 W 0000322262 BIZTEL, INC. (C/O AT&T CORP) MILWAUKEE 01/12/2001 39900.00000 - 39950.00000 42-30-00.0 N CA RM
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209289A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209289A1.txt
    • WLT781 082-39-22.6 W 0000324105 NEW PAR FREDRICKTOWN 01/16/2001 06315.84000 40-31-54.2 N ME MD KCK72 068-53-28.1 W 0000324532 NEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY VINALHAVEN 01/16/2001 11385.00000 44-06-25.3 N ME MD KCK72 068-53-28.1 W 0000324532 NEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY VINALHAVEN 01/16/2001 11465.00000 44-06-25.3 N ME MD KCK73 069-07-45.1 W 0000324544 NEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY ROCKLAND 01/16/2001 10895.00000 44-08-01.3 N ME MD KCK73 069-07-45.1 W 0000324544 NEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY ROCKLAND 01/16/2001 10975.00000 44-08-01.3 N DE MD WPOM735 075-32-35.8 W 0000325664 BACKLINK LLC WILMINGTON 01/16/2001 21375.00000 39-48-40.1 N DE MD WPOM733 075-32-36.4 W 0000325665 BACKLINK LLC WILMINGTON 01/16/2001 21575.00000 39-48-41.7 N PR MD WMT290 066-32-23.4 W 0000326055 SAN JUAN CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY CIALES 01/16/2001 05945.20000 18-15-45.0 N
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209552A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209552A1.txt
    • N NC MD WLV574 077-54-23.0 W 0000343651 NORTH CAROLINA RSA #9, INC. ASHTON 01/25/2001 02174.80000 34-28-26.0 N NC MD WLV574 077-54-23.0 W 0000343651 NORTH CAROLINA RSA #9, INC. ASHTON 01/25/2001 06770.00000 34-28-26.0 N NC MD WLV574 077-54-23.0 W 0000343651 NORTH CAROLINA RSA #9, INC. ASHTON 01/25/2001 06775.00000 34-28-26.0 N OR MD WPON434 122-39-37.9 W 0000343738 BACKLINK LLC PORTLAND 01/25/2001 17760.00000 45-31-01.3 N OR MD WPON434 122-39-37.9 W 0000343738 BACKLINK LLC PORTLAND 01/25/2001 21575.00000 45-31-01.3 N OR MD WLR453 123-16-32.0 W 0000344839 RCC Minnesota, Inc CORVALLIS 01/26/2001 06315.84000 44-38-25.0 N OR MD WLR453 123-16-32.0 W 0000344839 RCC Minnesota, Inc CORVALLIS 01/26/2001 06345.49000 44-38-25.0 N OR MD WLR453 123-16-32.0 W 0000344839 RCC Minnesota, Inc CORVALLIS 01/26/2001 06345.49000 44-38-25.0 N OR MD WMK818 123-00-57.0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209663A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209663A1.txt
    • Antenna # 3 C/L RCAMSL 192.00 meters, Antenna # 4 C/L RCAMSL 192.00 meters New Station Other Facilities Changes LEAD CALLSIGN: WMH993 File Number Applicant Channel(s) Station City & State BPMDH-20000818BTI LEACO RURAL TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE, INC. 1 SEMINOLE, TX Call Sign NEW (306617) Non-Common Carrier Status. Lat. 32 49 35 N. - Lon. 102 59 26 W. ON SR 212, 1.3 MILES EAST OF RANCH ROAD 3306, SEMINOLE, TX New Station Other Facilities Changes LEAD CALLSIGN: WMY449 File Number Applicant Channel(s) Station City & State BPMDH-20000818BJB LIBMOT COMMUNICATIONS PARTNERSHIP H2 OMAHA, NE Call Sign NEW (306799) Non-Common Carrier Status. Lat. 41 19 10 N. - Lon. 95 58 54 W. 45TH & NEWPORT, OMAHA, NE New Station Other Facilities Changes LEAD
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209814A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209814A1.txt
    • N UT RM WIV40 114-00-39.0 W 0000352396 Corban Communications, Inc. LUCIN 01/31/2001 11365.00000 41-17-36.7 N UT RM WIV40 114-00-39.0 W 0000352396 Corban Communications, Inc. LUCIN 01/31/2001 11445.00000 41-17-36.7 N UT RM WIV40 114-00-39.0 W 0000352396 Corban Communications, Inc. LUCIN 01/31/2001 11605.00000 41-17-36.7 N UT RM WIV40 114-00-39.0 W 0000352396 Corban Communications, Inc. LUCIN 01/31/2001 11685.00000 41-17-36.7 N NE RM WAH410 099-05-01.3 W 0000352397 Corban Communications, Inc. AXTEL 01/31/2001 03770.00000 40-29-32.0 N NE RM WAH410 099-05-01.3 W 0000352397 Corban Communications, Inc. AXTEL 01/31/2001 03770.00000 40-29-32.0 N NE RM WAH410 099-05-01.3 W 0000352397 Corban Communications, Inc. AXTEL 01/31/2001 03850.00000 40-29-32.0 N NE RM WAH410 099-05-01.3 W 0000352397 Corban Communications, Inc. AXTEL 01/31/2001 03850.00000 40-29-32.0 N NE RM WAH410 099-05-01.3 W 0000352397 Corban Communications,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210072A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210072A1.txt
    • 06620.00000 37-51-26.0 N KS MD KYT75 097-17-55.1 W 0000362828 The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Co Kechi 02/08/2001 06625.00000 37-51-26.0 N KS MD KYT75 097-17-55.1 W 0000362828 The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Co Kechi 02/08/2001 06680.00000 37-51-26.0 N NH MD WPQL533 072-20-19.3 W 0000363039 Central Vermont Public Service Corp CLAREMONT 02/08/2001 00958.75000 43-22-11.3 N NH MD WPQL534 072-00-01.3 W 0000363952 Central Vermont Public Service Corp BATH 02/09/2001 00957.55000 44-08-35.2 N TX NE 097-43-41.3 W 0000358505 ELECTRIC RELIABILITY COUNCIL OF TEXAS, INC Austin 02/05/2001 06063.80000 30-23-30.3 N TX NE 097-42-44.0 W 0000358522 ELECTRIC RELIABILITY COUNCIL OF TEXAS, INC AUSTIN 02/05/2001 06404.79000 30-12-35.0 N TX NE 097-21-33.0 W 0000358531 ELECTRIC RELIABILITY COUNCIL OF TEXAS, INC ELGIN 02/05/2001 05974.85000 30-25-01.0 N
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210801A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210801A1.txt
    • PA AM WPQY303 075-22-00.3 W 0000350152 BACKLINK LLC KING OF PRUSSIA 02/26/2001 17880.00000 40-05-23.4 N PA AM WPQY303 075-22-00.3 W 0000350152 BACKLINK LLC KING OF PRUSSIA 02/26/2001 18000.00000 40-05-23.4 N WV AM WMW616 077-58-32.4 W 0000372281 Washington/Baltimore Cellular Limited Partnership MARTINSBURG 03/02/2001 06826.25000 39-24-43.9 N ME MD KCK73 069-07-45.1 W 0000379180 NEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY ROCKLAND 02/26/2001 10895.00000 44-08-01.3 N ME MD KCK73 069-07-45.1 W 0000379180 NEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY ROCKLAND 02/26/2001 10975.00000 44-08-01.3 N ME MD KCK72 068-53-28.1 W 0000379191 NEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY VINALHAVEN 02/26/2001 11385.00000 44-06-25.3 N Page 6 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210955A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210955A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210955A1.txt
    • relevant geographic scope of relevant markets, see United States v. Philadelphia Nat'l Bank, 374 U.S. 321, 359 (1963) (defining relevant geographic market as an area in which a buyer may purchase a product or service from alternative sources, or in which the presence of other sellers restrains prices charged to buyers). See Merger Guidelines, 57 Fed. Reg. at 41556-41557 � 1.3. See, e.g. Philadelphia Nat'l Bank, 374 U.S. at 363 (``[A] significant increase in the concentration . . . must be enjoined in the absence of evidence clearly showing that the merger is not likely to have such anticompetitive effects.''). See also Merger Guidelines at 41558 �� 2.1, 2.2; New York v. Kraft General Foods, 926 F. Supp. 321, 359 (S.D.N.Y.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211021A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211021A1.txt
    • W 0000392065 MC CAW CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS OF FLORIDA INC MIAMI 03/09/2001 11175.00000 25-46-33.3 N FL MD WLB708 080-18-10.1 W 0000392100 MCCAW COMMUNICATIONS OF FLORIDA INC MIAMI 03/09/2001 05945.20000 25-41-43.3 N FL MD WLB708 080-18-10.1 W 0000392100 MCCAW COMMUNICATIONS OF FLORIDA INC MIAMI 03/09/2001 05974.85000 25-41-43.3 N FL MD WLB704 080-29-23.2 W 0000392130 MCCAW COMMUNICATIONS OF FLORIDA INC TAMIAMI 03/09/2001 06063.80000 25-46-01.3 N FL MD WLB704 080-29-23.2 W 0000392130 MCCAW COMMUNICATIONS OF FLORIDA INC TAMIAMI 03/09/2001 06226.89000 25-46-01.3 N FL MD WLB702 080-21-15.1 W 0000392159 MCCAW COMMUNICATIONS OF FLORIDA INC MIAMI 03/09/2001 06197.24000 25-54-45.3 N Page 19 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211250A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211250A1.txt
    • 0000333147 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC DENVER 03/12/2001 19680.00000 39-35-20.9 N IL AM WPQM255 087-38-09.0 W 0000336232 BACKLINK LLC CHICAGO 03/12/2001 21225.00000 41-53-01.1 N IL AM WPQM255 087-38-09.0 W 0000336232 BACKLINK LLC CHICAGO 03/12/2001 21275.00000 41-53-01.1 N IL AM WPQM255 087-38-09.0 W 0000336232 BACKLINK LLC CHICAGO 03/12/2001 21725.00000 41-53-01.1 N OR AM WPON434 122-39-37.9 W 0000343738 BACKLINK LLC PORTLAND 03/15/2001 17760.00000 45-31-01.3 N OR AM WPON434 122-39-37.9 W 0000343738 BACKLINK LLC PORTLAND 03/15/2001 17960.00000 45-31-01.3 N OR AM WPON434 122-39-37.9 W 0000343738 BACKLINK LLC PORTLAND 03/15/2001 18040.00000 45-31-01.3 N OR AM WPON434 122-39-37.9 W 0000343738 BACKLINK LLC PORTLAND 03/15/2001 21575.00000 45-31-01.3 N OR AM WPQQ790 122-40-44.7 W 0000352300 Teligent License Company II, L.L.C. PORTLAND 03/15/2001 19360.00000 45-31-15.8 N OR AM WPQQ790 122-40-44.7
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211420A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211420A1.txt
    • 122-23-21.8 W 0000401475 PACIFIC BELL REDDING 03/20/2001 11115.00000 40-34-58.7 N CA MD KNL90 122-23-21.8 W 0000401475 PACIFIC BELL REDDING 03/20/2001 11155.00000 40-34-58.7 N CA MD KNL90 122-23-21.8 W 0000401475 PACIFIC BELL REDDING 03/20/2001 18670.00000 40-34-58.7 N CA MD WLA676 122-48-05.4 W 0000401476 PACIFIC BELL LEWISTON 03/20/2001 10602.50000 40-42-19.5 N CA MD WHQ547 122-45-03.2 W 0000401479 PACIFIC BELL REDDING 03/20/2001 06550.00000 40-41-01.3 N CA MD WHQ547 122-45-03.2 W 0000401479 PACIFIC BELL REDDING 03/20/2001 10667.50000 40-41-01.3 N CA MD WHQ547 122-45-03.2 W 0000401479 PACIFIC BELL REDDING 03/20/2001 11245.00000 40-41-01.3 N CA MD WHQ547 122-45-03.2 W 0000401479 PACIFIC BELL REDDING 03/20/2001 11285.00000 40-41-01.3 N CA MD WHQ547 122-45-03.2 W 0000401479 PACIFIC BELL REDDING 03/20/2001 11325.00000 40-41-01.3 N CA MD WHQ547 122-45-03.2 W 0000401479 PACIFIC
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211773A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211773A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211773A1.txt
    • 30, 2001 (Karegianes Letter). See Petition of the Illinois Commerce Commission for Expedited Temporary Waiver of 47 CFR Section 52.19(c)(3)(ii), filed August 10, 1999. In the Matter of Illinois Commerce Commission Petition for Expedited Temporary Waiver of 47 CFR Section 52.19(c)(3)(ii), Order (rel. March 2, 2000) (Waiver Order). Id. at para. 14. Id. at para. 14. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; Karegianes Letter. Waiver Order at para. 12. Id. at para. 14. See Karegianes Letter. E-mail from Brent Struthers, Director, Regulatory Matters, NeuStar, Inc., to Yog Varma, Deputy Bureau Chief, Common Carrier Bureau, dated March 23, 2001. Federal Communications Commission DA 01-628 - �
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212431A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212431A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212431A1.txt
    • The Commission resolved several issues crucial to the rapid conversion of the nation's broadcast television system from analog to digital. Comments due April 6*; replies due May 7. Contact: Roger Holberg at (202) 418-2134. PN 04/25/01; DA 01-1072 In The Matter of Extension of the Five-Year Build-Out Period for BTA Authorization Holders in the Multipoint Distribution Service. Pursuant to Section 1.3 of the commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the Mass Media Bureau seeks comment on a proposal to extend the current five-year build-out requirement imposed upon Basic Trading Area authorization holders in the Multipoint Distribution Service by two years. Comments due May 9; reply due May 16. Contact: Brad Lerner at (202) 418-7066. 1072A1.txt OFFICE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY ET
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212477A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212477A1.txt
    • MD WHA740 118-19-51.2 W 0000440744 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP TORRANCE 04/27/2001 19485.00000 33-48-43.0 N CA MD WMW377 118-21-06.2 W 0000440773 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP TORRANCE 04/27/2001 17925.00000 33-49-01.0 N MA MD WLT356 071-07-43.7 W 0000441236 Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, LLCJAMICA PLAIN 04/27/2001 10648.12500 42-18-05.7 N MA MD WLV791 070-43-57.1 W 0000441253 Cellco Partnership, dba Verizon WirelessMARSHFIELD 04/27/2001 10616.25000 42-08-01.3 N Page 22 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OR NE 122-42-47.7 W 0000435188 BACKLINK LLC Portland 04/23/2001 21425.00000 45-27-21.6 N AZ NE 112-01-35.2 W 0000435214 BACKLINK LLC Phoenix 04/23/2001 17960.00000 33-31-30.1 N AZ NE 111-52-09.2 W 0000435274 BACKLINK LLC
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212558A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212558A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212558A1.txt
    • comment on the recommendations that appear in all of the WRC-03 Advisory Committee documents and on the Commission's initial impressions of which preliminary views it can support. Comments due May 9. MASS MEDIA BUREAU PN 04/25/01; DA 01-1072 In The Matter of Extension of the Five-Year Build-Out Period for BTA Authorization Holders in the Multipoint Distribution Service. Pursuant to Section 1.3 of the commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the Mass Media Bureau seeks comment on a proposal to extend the current five-year build-out requirement imposed upon Basic Trading Area authorization holders in the Multipoint Distribution Service by two years. Comments due May 9; reply due May 16. Contact: Brad Lerner at (202) 418-7066. 1072A1.txt OFFICE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY ET
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212664A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212664A1.txt
    • of Nevada Silver Peak 05/03/2001 02168.40000 37-42-29.7 N FL NE 080-04-48.1 W 0000448541 Fuzion Wireless Communications, Inc. West Palm Beach 05/03/2001 17920.00000 26-43-31.0 N FL NE 080-04-48.1 W 0000448558 Fuzion Wireless Communications, Inc. W. Palm Beach 05/03/2001 18080.00000 26-43-31.0 N PR NE 066-08-48.8 W 0000448822 Crown Castle International Corp. De Puerto Rico Catano HQ 05/03/2001 06197.24000 18-25-24.2 N CA NE 122-24-01.3 W 0000449373 BACKLINK LLC San Francisco 05/04/2001 21375.00000 37-47-29.1 N Page 29 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA NE 122-24-01.5 W 0000449374 BACKLINK LLC San Francisco 05/04/2001 22575.00000 37-47-22.8 N MO NE 090-25-50.6 W 0000450021 KATLINK LLC St. Louis
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212779A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212779A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212779A1.txt
    • the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 61.48(o)(2). Comments due May14; replies due May 21. Contact: Wanda M. Harris at (202) 418-1530. CC 96-45; PN 05/08/01; DA 01-1154 Oklahoma Telephone & Telegraph, Inc. Seek a Waiver of Section 36.621(a)(4) In Part 36 of the Commission's Rules. Pleading Cycle Established. On April 30, 2001, Oklahoma Telephone & Telegraph, Inc. pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, filed a letter seeking a waiver of the corporate operations expense limitation in section 36.621(a)(4)(ii) of the Commission's rules to allow it to include its actual corporations expenses in the calculation of its federal USF expense adjustment. Comments due May 30; replies due June 11. Contact: Antoinette Stevens at (202) 418-7400, TTY: (202) 418-0484. CC 96-45,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213164A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213164A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213164A1.txt
    • with Section 64.903 of the Commission's rules. Comments due June 5; replies due June 20. Contact: Kim Yee at (202) 418-0805. CC 96-45; PN 05/08/01; DA 01-1154 Oklahoma Telephone & Telegraph, Inc. Seek a Waiver of Section 36.621(a)(4) In Part 36 of the Commission's Rules. Pleading Cycle Established. On April 30, 2001, Oklahoma Telephone & Telegraph, Inc. pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, filed a letter seeking a waiver of the corporate operations expense limitation in section 36.621(a)(4)(ii) of the Commission's rules to allow it to include its actual corporations expenses in the calculation of its federal USF expense adjustment. Comments due May 30; replies due June 11. Contact: Antoinette Stevens at (202) 418-7400, TTY: (202) 418-0484. CC 96-45,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213292A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213292A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213292A1.txt
    • with Section 64.903 of the Commission's rules. Comments due June 5; replies due June 20. Contact: Kim Yee at (202) 418-0805. CC 96-45; PN 05/08/01; DA 01-1154 Oklahoma Telephone & Telegraph, Inc. Seek a Waiver of Section 36.621(a)(4) In Part 36 of the Commission's Rules. Pleading Cycle Established. On April 30, 2001, Oklahoma Telephone & Telegraph, Inc. pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, filed a letter seeking a waiver of the corporate operations expense limitation in section 36.621(a)(4)(ii) of the Commission's rules to allow it to include its actual corporations expenses in the calculation of its Federal USF expense adjustment. Comments due May 30*; replies due June 11. Contact: Antoinette Stevens at (202) 418-7400, TTY: (202) 418-0484. CC 96-45,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213589A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213589A1.txt
    • PA AM 077-00-26.9 W 0000098638 Pennsylvania Microwave Network Inc. Wertzville 06/04/2001 11075.00000 40-18-19.3 N PA AM 077-00-26.9 W 0000098638 Pennsylvania Microwave Network Inc. Wertzville 06/04/2001 17960.00000 40-18-19.3 N PA AM 077-00-26.9 W 0000098638 Pennsylvania Microwave Network Inc. Wertzville 06/04/2001 19330.00000 40-18-19.3 N IN AM 087-24-08.5 W 0000144333 STATE OF INDIANA INDOT BLACK OAK 06/06/2001 19280.00000 41-34-12.9 N SD AM WEH429 098-31-01.3 W 0000385653 BASIN ELECTRIC POWER COOPERATIVE ALPENA 06/07/2001 06615.00000 44-11-02.9 N SD AM WEH431 098-23-33.3 W 0000385654 BASIN ELECTRIC POWER COOPERATIVE BROADLAND 06/07/2001 06775.00000 44-28-20.9 N IA AM KAV24 092-22-46.0 W 0000403119 NORTHEAST MISSOURI ELECTRIC POWER COOP BLOOMFIELD 06/06/2001 01935.00000 40-43-22.0 N IA AM KAV24 092-22-46.0 W 0000403119 NORTHEAST MISSOURI ELECTRIC POWER COOP BLOOMFIELD 06/06/2001 01965.00000 40-43-22.0 N IA AM
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213767A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213767A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213767A1.txt
    • 5,LANE 217, CHUNG HSIAO E. RD.SEC3 TAIPEI, TAIWAN ROC 1060-CX-2001 8145495-5 REGISTRANT: ELITEGROUP COMPUTER SYSTEMS CO., LTD. MANUFACTURER: ELITE COMPUTER SYSTEM MANUFACTURE TYPE OF FILING: ORIGINAL REGISTRATION REG. NO: ECSCHN-36259-M5-E REG. CLASS: TERMINAL DEVICE TYPE OF EQUIPMENT: 56KBPS MODEMS USING ANALOG UPLOAD/DIGITAL DOWNLOAD PROCESSING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION: INTERNAL 56.0K DATA/14.4K FAX MODEM DAA INTERFACE CARD TRADE NAME: ECS MODEL: FB DAA2 V1.3 The certificate for 1061-CX-2001 will be sent to the following address: TRAINING RESEARCH CO., LTD. NO. 2., LANE 194, HUAN-HO STREET,HSICHIH TAIPEI HSIEN 221, TAIWAN ROC 1061-CX-2001 8145495-1 REGISTRANT: AMIGO TECHNOLOGY MANUFACTURER: AMIGO TECHNOLOGY CO LTD TYPE OF FILING: ORIGINAL REGISTRATION REG. NO: 5RJTAI-36260-M5-E REG. CLASS: TERMINAL DEVICE TYPE OF EQUIPMENT: 56KBPS MODEMS USING ANALOG UPLOAD/DIGITAL DOWNLOAD PROCESSING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION:
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214106A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214106A1.txt
    • RIO GRANDE 06/27/2001 11295.00000 18-25-00.4 N PR NE 065-49-42.9 W 0000503553 SprintCom, Inc. RIO GRANDE 06/27/2001 11365.00000 18-25-00.4 N PR NE 065-49-42.9 W 0000503553 SprintCom, Inc. RIO GRANDE 06/27/2001 11663.75000 18-25-00.4 N PR NE 066-28-27.0 W 0000503637 SprintCom, Inc. JUANA DIAZ 06/27/2001 06034.15000 18-02-02.0 N PR NE 066-28-27.0 W 0000503637 SprintCom, Inc. JUANA DIAZ 06/27/2001 10955.00000 18-02-02.0 N NC NE 078-55-01.3 W 0000503680 North Carolina RSA #9, Inc. ALLENTON 06/27/2001 06585.00000 34-36-33.3 N NC NE 077-26-10.1 W 0000503725 North Carolina RSA #9, Inc. CONETOE 06/27/2001 06745.00000 35-50-10.6 N AZ NE 112-01-13.8 W 0000504578 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Phoenix 06/28/2001 19360.00000 33-31-20.1 N IA NE 091-58-12.3 W 0000504645 USCOC of Greater Iowa, Inc. Williamsburg 06/28/2001 06615.00000 41-41-10.6 N IA NE 091-32-50.4 W
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214594A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214594A1.txt
    • CARMICHAEL 07/12/2001 00952.53750 38-37-34.3 N CT MD WPNB732 072-03-23.2 W 0000522480 CONNECTICUT, STATE OF LEDYARD 07/12/2001 06615.00000 41-25-32.3 N CT MD WPNB732 072-03-23.2 W 0000522480 CONNECTICUT, STATE OF LEDYARD 07/12/2001 06675.00000 41-25-32.3 N Page 45 MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CT NE 072-45-01.3 W 0000518284 State of Connecticut, ATTN:State Police Division MERIDEN 07/10/2001 06765.00000 41-32-00.4 N CT NE 072-45-01.3 W 0000518284 State of Connecticut, ATTN:State Police Division MERIDEN 07/10/2001 06805.00000 41-32-00.4 N ID NE 111-55-23.8 W 0000518982 State of Idaho Lava Hot Springs 07/10/2001 06835.00000 42-30-56.7 N CT NE 072-47-54.4 W 0000519775 State of Connecticut, ATTN:State Police Division MERIDEN 07/11/2001 06645.00000 41-32-50.4 N
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215020A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215020A1.txt
    • OFFSHORE 07/30/2001 06655.00000 29-17-14.7 N CA NE 122-29-05.0 W 0000541355 AT&T Wireless Services of Florida, Inc. Sausalito 07/30/2001 17775.00000 37-50-08.0 N CA NE 122-24-30.9 W 0000541369 AT&T Wireless Services of Florida, Inc. San Francisco 07/30/2001 19335.00000 37-48-19.7 N NY NE 073-45-28.4 W 0000541628 AT&T CORP ALBANY 07/30/2001 17760.00000 42-39-03.3 N NY NE 073-41-47.4 W 0000541629 AT&T CORP TROY 07/30/2001 19320.00000 42-41-01.3 N NV NE 119-44-01.6 W 0000545115 Pacific Bell Wireless, LLC RENO 07/31/2001 17925.00000 39-22-51.3 N NV NE 119-46-01.8 W 0000545147 Pacific Bell Wireless, LLC RENO 07/31/2001 19485.00000 39-22-09.7 N PA NE 078-40-36.4 W 0000545518 Cellco Partnership dba Verizon WirelessPortage 07/31/2001 06286.79000 40-24-32.4 N PA NE 078-40-36.4 W 0000545518 Cellco Partnership dba Verizon WirelessPortage 07/31/2001 06315.84000 40-24-32.4 N PA NE 078-40-36.4
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
    • Information Center at 445 12th Street, S.W., Courtyard Level. Copies may be purchased by calling International Transcription Service, Inc. at (202) 857-3800. The report can also be downloaded [file names: TREND101.ZIP, TREND101.PDF] from the FCC-State Link Internet site at . i Table of Contents Introduction..................................................................................................1-1 Access Charges............................................................................................1-3 Table 1.1 Interstate Per-Line Access Charges..........................................................................1-5 Table 1.2 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges......................................................................1-6 Table 1.3 Interstate Per-Line Access Charges by Carrier..........................................................1-7 Table 1.4 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges by Carrier......................................................1-8 Advanced Telecommunications....................................................................2-1 Table 2.1 High-Speed Lines.....................................................................................................2-3 Table 2.2 Advanced Services Lines..........................................................................................2-3 Table 2.3 Residential and Small Business High-Speed Lines......................................................2-3 Table 2.4 High-Speed Lines by Technology..............................................................................2-4 Consumer Expenditures...............................................................................3-1 Table 3.1 Household Expenditures for Telephone Service.........................................................3-3 Chart 3.1 Monthly Telephone Service Expenditures..................................................................3-3 Table 3.2 Average Monthly Household Telecommunications
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215580A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215580A1.txt
    • N AR MD WLL282 094-24-59.0 W 0000559752 ALLTEL COMMUNICATIONS INC FT. SMITH 08/14/2001 06256.54000 35-21-40.0 N AR MD WLL282 094-24-59.0 W 0000559752 ALLTEL COMMUNICATIONS INC FT. SMITH 08/14/2001 06286.19000 35-21-40.0 N AR MD WLL282 094-24-59.0 W 0000559752 ALLTEL COMMUNICATIONS INC FT. SMITH 08/14/2001 06375.14000 35-21-40.0 N IL MD WMQ576 089-59-25.6 W 0000560077 CYBERTEL CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY FAIRVIEW HEIGHTS 08/15/2001 02120.40000 38-36-01.3 N IL MD WMQ576 089-59-25.6 W 0000560077 CYBERTEL CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY FAIRVIEW HEIGHTS 08/15/2001 05927.50000 38-36-01.3 N IL MD WMQ576 089-59-25.6 W 0000560077 CYBERTEL CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY FAIRVIEW HEIGHTS 08/15/2001 06034.15000 38-36-01.3 N IL MD WMQ576 089-59-25.6 W 0000560077 CYBERTEL CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY FAIRVIEW HEIGHTS 08/15/2001 06063.80000 38-36-01.3 N MO MD WMN874 092-17-23.0 W 0000560395 Ameritech Mobile Communications, LLCASHLAND 08/15/2001
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215731A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215731A1.txt
    • 080-30-29.0 W 0000568354 CLEAR CHANNEL BROADCASTING LICENSES INC TAVERNIER 08/22/2001 00945.00000 25-01-36.0 N FL MD WLE774 080-30-29.0 W 0000568354 CLEAR CHANNEL BROADCASTING LICENSES INC TAVERNIER 08/22/2001 00948.00000 25-01-36.0 N OH MD WLE551 084-30-07.0 W 0000568382 JACOR BROADCASTING CORPORATIONCINCINNATI 08/22/2001 00949.50000 39-06-59.0 N KY MD WPNH505 085-34-10.0 W 0000569485 Salem Media of Kentucky, Inc. LOUISVILLE 08/23/2001 00945.00000 38-15-56.0 N AZ NE 111-07-01.3 W 0000566969 Capstar TX Limited Partnership TUCSON 08/21/2001 00947.50000 32-14-56.3 N KY NE 085-34-10.0 W 0000569616 Salem Media of Kentucky, Inc. Louisville 08/23/2001 00945.00000 38-15-56.0 N IA NE 095-45-43.0 W 0000569634 Waitt Radio, Inc Glenwood 08/23/2001 00949.50000 41-09-18.0 N KY NE 085-42-24.0 W 0000569639 Salem Media of Kentucky, Inc. LOUISVILLE 08/23/2001 00946.00000 38-16-17.0 N AZ NE 111-40-28.5 W 0000570444 Big
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-216016A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-216016A1.txt
    • Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City GA MD WEH855 084-56-09.8 W 0000584208 NORTH GEORGIA ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP CORPORATION CALHOUN 09/05/2001 02139.60000 34-28-50.3 N GA MD WEH855 084-56-09.8 W 0000584208 NORTH GEORGIA ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP CORPORATION CALHOUN 09/05/2001 06605.00000 34-28-50.3 N GA MD WEH856 085-15-29.8 W 0000584209 NORTH GEORGIA ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP CORPORATION FORT OGELTHORPE 09/05/2001 02186.40000 34-57-01.3 N GA MD WEH856 085-15-29.8 W 0000584209 NORTH GEORGIA ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP CORPORATION FORT OGELTHORPE 09/05/2001 06805.00000 34-57-01.3 N GA MD WEH856 085-15-29.8 W 0000584209 NORTH GEORGIA ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP CORPORATION FORT OGELTHORPE 09/05/2001 06825.00000 34-57-01.3 N GA MD WEH859 085-01-09.8 W 0000584270 NORTH GEORGIA ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP CORPORATION DALTON 09/05/2001 02183.20000 34-44-00.3 N GA MD WEH859 085-01-09.8 W 0000584270 NORTH GEORGIA ELECTRIC
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-216205A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-216205A1.txt
    • WLK830 090-07-24.4 W 0000559469 CYBERTEL CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY GRANITE CITY 09/13/2001 05974.85000 38-45-46.2 N IL AM WLK830 090-07-24.4 W 0000559469 CYBERTEL CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY GRANITE CITY 09/13/2001 10616.25000 38-45-46.2 N IL AM WLK830 090-07-24.4 W 0000559469 CYBERTEL CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY GRANITE CITY 09/13/2001 10623.75000 38-45-46.2 N IL AM WMQ576 089-59-25.6 W 0000560077 CYBERTEL CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY FAIRVIEW HEIGHTS 09/12/2001 02120.40000 38-36-01.3 N IL AM WMQ576 089-59-25.6 W 0000560077 CYBERTEL CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY FAIRVIEW HEIGHTS 09/12/2001 05927.50000 38-36-01.3 N IL AM WMQ576 089-59-25.6 W 0000560077 CYBERTEL CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY FAIRVIEW HEIGHTS 09/12/2001 06034.15000 38-36-01.3 N IL AM WMQ576 089-59-25.6 W 0000560077 CYBERTEL CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY FAIRVIEW HEIGHTS 09/12/2001 06034.15000 38-36-01.3 N IL AM WMQ576 089-59-25.6 W 0000560077 CYBERTEL CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY FAIRVIEW
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-216388A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-216388A1.txt
    • N MA MD WPNB825 071-30-06.2 W 0000595985 MASSACHUSETTS WATER RESOURCES AUTHORITY SOUTHBORO 09/19/2001 10715.00000 42-18-48.3 N MA MD WPNB825 071-30-06.2 W 0000595985 MASSACHUSETTS WATER RESOURCES AUTHORITY SOUTHBORO 09/19/2001 10795.00000 42-18-48.3 N NJ MD WNEL596 074-50-20.5 W 0000598187 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF WEST TRENTON 09/20/2001 06845.00000 40-15-48.3 N NJ MD WNEL597 074-43-01.5 W 0000598188 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF BORDENTOWN 09/20/2001 06675.00000 40-08-01.3 N NJ MD WNEL597 074-43-01.5 W 0000598188 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF BORDENTOWN 09/20/2001 06685.00000 40-08-01.3 N NJ MD WNEL598 074-55-56.5 W 0000598189 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF BERLIN 09/20/2001 06805.00000 39-48-14.4 N NJ MD WNEL598 074-55-56.5 W 0000598189 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF BERLIN 09/20/2001 06835.00000 39-48-14.4 N CA MD KYL39 118-39-37.3 W 0000598202 CITY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF WATER &
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-216824A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-216824A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-216824A1.txt
    • in Exhibit 1.1 below. Exhibit 1.1 IB Customers will scroll down and click on the application they wish to select. Several of the applications available for filing are shown in Exhibit 1.2. . Exhibit 1.2 IB Customers are presented with a new screen, which offers them the opportunity to register for an Applicant's FRN in CORES as shown on Exhibit 1.3. To take advantage of this opportunity, click on the Register in CORES link, if you have not already done so. Exhibit 1.3 IB Customers will be transferred temporarily to the COmmission REgistration System (CORES) where they will enter the requested information. See Exhibit 1.4. Exhibit 1.4 . `` See Exhibit 1.5 below. Exhibit 1.5 IB customers will be returned to
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217105A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217105A1.txt
    • RO WPJW372 0000634260 DOERING, JIM 10/18/2001 Page 29 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TX AM 098-28-12.0 W 0000581038 SOUTH TEXAS ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE INC CHRISTINE 10/15/2001 02131.60000 28-42-01.9 N GA AM WEH856 085-15-29.8 W 0000584209 NORTH GEORGIA ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP CORPORATION FORT OGELTHORPE 10/16/2001 02186.40000 34-57-01.3 N GA AM WEH856 085-15-29.8 W 0000584209 NORTH GEORGIA ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP CORPORATION FORT OGELTHORPE 10/16/2001 06805.00000 34-57-01.3 N GA AM WEH856 085-15-29.8 W 0000584209 NORTH GEORGIA ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP CORPORATION FORT OGELTHORPE 10/16/2001 06825.00000 34-57-01.3 N GA AM 085-12-37.0 W 0000585505 NORTH GEORGIA ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP CORP FORT OGLETHORPE 10/16/2001 06665.00000 34-56-13.0 N NE AM 099-36-52.4 W 0000595089 THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217280A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217280A1.txt
    • TOLEDO 10/26/2001 02076.00000 - 02093.00000 41-41-00.0 N OH AM KW8584 P 083-24-49.0 W 0000372611 WTVG, INC. TOLEDO 10/26/2001 02093.00000 - 02110.00000 41-41-00.0 N MN NE C 0000641431 Fox Television Stations, Inc. 10/26/2001 02042.00000 - 02059.00000 TS - TV Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA AM 118-20-01.3 W 0000609320 Venture Technologies Group LLC Los Angeles 10/04/2001 12987.50000 34-05-28.0 N LA AM KKZ96 090-04-29.2 W 0000626593 NEW ORLEANS HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, Inc NEW ORLEANS 10/23/2001 06950.00000 - 06975.00000 29-56-39.7 N NY MD WCQ508 073-58-53.4 W 0000637168 FOX TELEVISION STATIONS INC NEW YORK 10/23/2001 13025.00000 - 13050.00000 40-46-08.3 N WA MD WBK222 122-20-52.8 W 0000637538 FISHER BROADCASTING COMPANY SEATTLE 10/23/2001
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217635A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217635A1.txt
    • N AZ MD WPY77 109-34-29.3 W 0000653335 CNG Communications, Inc. GREER 11/08/2001 04170.00000 34-06-33.1 N Page 20 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City AZ MD WPY77 109-34-29.3 W 0000653335 CNG Communications, Inc. GREER 11/08/2001 19385.00000 34-06-33.1 N CA MD WMW223 118-31-01.3 W 0000653338 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ENCINO 11/08/2001 10588.12500 34-09-45.0 N CA MD WPJE773 118-35-47.3 W 0000653359 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP CHATSWORTH 11/08/2001 19645.00000 34-15-25.0 N CA MD WMR857 118-27-56.2 W 0000653399 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP VAN NUYS 11/08/2001 10583.75000 34-10-39.0 N WY MD WLT752 110-30-16.6 W 0000653415 UNION TELEPHONE COMPANY INC KEMMERER 11/08/2001 06256.54000 41-50-17.8 N
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217848A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217848A1.txt
    • 11172.50000 18-18-29.4 N AZ NE 114-20-14.0 W 0000656470 CNG Communications, Inc. YUMA 11/13/2001 17935.00000 32-40-22.2 N AZ NE 113-45-56.3 W 0000656959 CNG Communications, Inc. MOHAWK PASS 11/14/2001 19385.00000 32-43-24.8 N TX NE 102-36-06.0 W 0000656970 Corpus Christi SMSA Limited PartnershipPENWELL 11/14/2001 05945.20000 31-43-13.1 N TX NE 102-36-06.0 W 0000656970 Corpus Christi SMSA Limited PartnershipPENWELL 11/14/2001 06004.50000 31-43-13.1 N OR NE 122-29-01.3 W 0000657600 AT&T Wireless Services of Florida, Inc. Happy Valley 11/14/2001 10667.50000 45-27-39.5 N OR NE 122-32-50.3 W 0000657823 AT&T Wireless Services of Florida, Inc. Happy Valley 11/14/2001 10602.50000 45-27-07.4 N WV NE 078-03-19.2 W 0000659358 Hardy Cellular Telephone Company BERKLEY SPRINGS 11/15/2001 11623.12500 39-38-56.1 N WV NE 080-44-21.0 W 0000659693 Hardy Cellular Telephone Company RUPERT 11/15/2001 06745.00000 37-58-23.0 N
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217975A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217975A1.txt
    • Applicant Name Latitude City KY AM 082-44-17.5 W 0000619532 Wise County Broadcasting Near Mayking 11/23/2001 00944.50000 37-06-38.3 N KY AM 082-44-17.5 W 0000619532 Wise County Broadcasting Near Mayking 11/23/2001 00946.50000 37-06-38.3 N MA MD WPNN716 072-37-48.3 W 0000662811 GREAT NORTHERN RADIO, LLC Northampton 11/19/2001 00951.50000 42-19-08.3 N MA MD WMV430 072-35-32.3 W 0000663806 GREAT NORTHERN RADIO, LLC Deerfield 11/20/2001 00947.50000 42-32-01.3 N MN MD WLI649 094-08-20.0 W 0000664816 Sartell FM, Inc. St. Cloud 11/21/2001 00944.50000 45-33-36.0 N MN MD WLI649 094-08-20.0 W 0000664816 Sartell FM, Inc. St. Cloud 11/21/2001 00944.50000 45-33-36.0 N GA NE 083-24-25.0 W 0000663273 Sorenson Southeast Radio, LLC Clayton 11/20/2001 00946.50000 34-51-41.0 N Page 2 AS - Aural Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-218761A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-218761A1.txt
    • LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Mount Ayr 12/19/2001 40-42-27.0 N IA MD KNKN492 093-18-47.6 W 0000704513 IOWA RSA NO. 2 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Corydon 12/19/2001 40-46-09.3 N AZ MD KNKN251 109-23-09.5 W 0000706811 WWC License L.L.C. Morenci 12/20/2001 33-05-42.5 N AZ MD KNKN251 109-18-50.3 W 0000706811 WWC License L.L.C. Safford 12/20/2001 32-53-14.2 N AZ MD KNKN251 109-36-27.2 W 0000706811 WWC License L.L.C. WILCOX 12/20/2001 32-13-01.3 N GS - Private Carrier Paging, 929-930 MHz State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OH NE 084-04-56.0 W 0000696919 Paging Network of America, Inc. BEAVERCREEK 12/17/2001 00929.96250 39-40-48.0 N OH NE 084-19-06.0 W 0000696919 Paging Network of America, Inc. CHERRY GROVE 12/17/2001 00929.96250 39-04-24.0 N OH NE 084-21-21.0 W
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219552A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219552A1.txt
    • 01/22/2002 00949.00000 35-37-10.4 N AK NE 149-53-15.0 W 0000740974 COLEMAN, CHESTER P ANCHORAGE 01/07/2002 00944.50000 61-11-45.0 N AK NE 149-53-16.0 W 0000741012 COLEMAN, CHESTER P ANCHORAGE 01/07/2002 00947.00000 61-11-50.0 N AK NE 149-53-16.0 W 0000743328 COLEMAN, CHESTER P ANCHORAGE 01/07/2002 00949.87500 61-11-50.0 N OR NE 121-47-15.0 W 0000744832 Cove Road Publishing, LLC Klamath Falls 01/23/2002 00951.00000 42-13-57.5 N CA NE 119-59-01.3 W 0000747509 Citadel Broadcasting Company Mariposa 01/25/2002 00944.50000 37-30-01.9 N MD NE 076-36-19.9 W 0000747799 Infinity WLIF, Inc. Towson 01/25/2002 00950.00000 39-24-08.3 N CA NE 117-07-11.5 W 0000747976 CITICASTERS LICENSES, INC. SAN DIEGO 01/25/2002 00948.50000 32-48-25.3 N CD - Paging and Radiotelephone State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City AR
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219990A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219990A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219990A1.txt
    • will allow the public safety community to utilize the latest technological tools - through real time video displays, Internet access, and other capabilities - in respond to emergency situations. International Considerations: As we prepare for the 2003 World Radiocommunication Conference in Caracas, the U.S. is examining the value of a possible global allocation for public protection use. WRC Agenda Item 1.3 is actually the topic of an ITU Working Group meeting in Rome as we speak. Going forward, it is important that any international allocation decision grant respective administrations significant flexibility, while also identifying multiple possible bands for such use. In this regard, the United States must be vigilant that the international decisions reached include bands identified domestically - such as
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220113A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220113A1.txt
    • 00075.50000 30-28-48.7 N MS MD WNZW616 089-03-30.0 W 0000769256 Teletouch Licenses, Inc. PERKSTON 02/12/2002 00075.86000 30-44-49.0 N Page 17 IK - Industrial/Business Pool - Commercial, Conventional State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MS MD WNZW616 089-03-30.0 W 0000769256 Teletouch Licenses, Inc. PERKSTON 02/12/2002 00075.86000 30-44-49.0 N LA MD WPAM359 090-46-01.3 W 0000770415 TELETOUCH LICENSES, INC GRAY 02/13/2002 00072.40000 29-42-10.8 N LA MD WPAM359 090-09-24.3 W 0000770415 TELETOUCH LICENSES, INC METAIRIE 02/13/2002 00075.98000 30-00-44.7 N LA MD WPAM359 090-09-24.3 W 0000770415 TELETOUCH LICENSES, INC METAIRIE 02/13/2002 00075.98000 30-00-44.7 N GA MD WPRW238 083-23-35.6 W 0000770875 BARKER COMMUNICATIONS INC EATONTON 02/13/2002 00158.46000 33-18-50.5 N GA MD WPRW238 083-28-37.6 W 0000770875 BARKER COMMUNICATIONS
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220305A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220305A1.txt
    • 02/19/2002 00928.81875 33-27-37.0 N AL NE 087-21-33.0 W 0000776668 Alabama Power Company E. BROOKWOOD 02/19/2002 00952.81875 33-27-37.0 N CA NE P 116-54-51.5 W 0000776705 Otay Water District Spring Valley 02/19/2002 00956.39375 32-39-44.2 N CA NE P 116-54-51.5 W 0000776705 Otay Water District Spring Valley 02/19/2002 00956.39375 32-39-44.2 N AZ NE 111-07-37.4 W 0000777082 SOUTHWEST TRANSMISSION COOPERATIVE INC MARANA 02/19/2002 06675.00000 32-24-01.3 N CA NE P 011-59-50.0 W 0000777235 Fillmore, City of Fillmore 02/19/2002 00956.36875 34-24-00.0 N CA NE P 011-59-50.0 W 0000777235 Fillmore, City of Fillmore 02/19/2002 00956.36875 34-24-00.0 N MI NE P 088-34-40.0 W 0000777268 Houghton, City of Houghton 02/19/2002 00956.40625 47-08-10.0 N MI NE P 088-34-40.0 W 0000777268 Houghton, City of Houghton 02/19/2002 00956.40625 47-08-10.0 N MO NE 092-12-31.0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220546A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220546A1.txt
    • 00075.50000 30-28-48.7 N Page 19 IK - Industrial/Business Pool - Commercial, Conventional State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MS AM WNZW616 089-03-30.0 W 0000769256 Teletouch Licenses, Inc. PERKSTON 02/27/2002 00075.86000 30-44-49.0 N MS AM WNZW616 089-03-30.0 W 0000769256 Teletouch Licenses, Inc. PERKSTON 02/27/2002 00075.86000 30-44-49.0 N LA AM WPAM359 090-46-01.3 W 0000770415 TELETOUCH LICENSES, INC GRAY 02/27/2002 00072.40000 29-42-10.8 N LA AM WPAM359 090-09-24.3 W 0000770415 TELETOUCH LICENSES, INC METAIRIE 02/27/2002 00075.98000 30-00-44.7 N LA AM WPAM359 090-09-24.3 W 0000770415 TELETOUCH LICENSES, INC METAIRIE 02/27/2002 00075.98000 30-00-44.7 N MD KNEH287 O 0000786062 TEXAS COMMUNICATIONS OF BROWNWOOD, L.P. 02/25/2002 00464.70000 MD KNEH287 O 0000786062 TEXAS COMMUNICATIONS OF BROWNWOOD, L.P. 02/25/2002 00469.70000
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220784A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220784A1.txt
    • Name Latitude City TX AM KNHR822 095-38-59.0 W 0000721742 ENGLISH, DAVID L PALESTINE 03/05/2002 00462.80000 31-43-04.0 N TX AM KNHR822 095-38-59.0 W 0000721742 ENGLISH, DAVID L PALESTINE 03/05/2002 00462.80000 31-43-04.0 N NC AM 080-00-16.1 W 0000742637 Action Lane High Point 03/05/2002 00451.32500 35-55-13.5 N NC AM 080-00-16.1 W 0000742637 Action Lane High Point 03/05/2002 00462.77500 35-55-13.5 N LA AM WPAM359 090-46-01.3 W 0000770415 TELETOUCH LICENSES, INC GRAY 03/07/2002 00072.40000 29-42-10.8 N LA AM WPAM359 090-09-24.3 W 0000770415 TELETOUCH LICENSES, INC METAIRIE 03/07/2002 00075.98000 30-00-44.7 N LA AM WPAM359 090-09-24.3 W 0000770415 TELETOUCH LICENSES, INC METAIRIE 03/07/2002 00075.98000 30-00-44.7 N LA MD WNWE699 179-59-00.0 W 0000795710 Satellink Paging, LLC BATON ROUGE 03/05/2002 00075.46000 30-23-52.0 N NE A 095-32-16.1 W 0000795094 MORK, ROGER
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220999A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220999A1.txt
    • Corporation Winston-Salem 03/14/2002 00945.50000 36-09-04.5 N NC NE 080-21-16.2 W 0000809608 Truth Broadcasting Corporation Sauratown Mountain 03/14/2002 00949.00000 36-22-48.5 N NC NE 080-21-16.2 W 0000809608 Truth Broadcasting Corporation Sauratown Mountain 03/14/2002 00949.00000 36-22-48.5 N FL NE 080-28-02.0 W 0000810373 SEBASTIAN BROADCASTING COMPANYSEBASTIAN 03/11/2002 00946.50000 27-48-41.0 N PA NE 075-49-30.7 W 0000810605 ROBERT C. CORDARO, INC. WILKES-BARRE 03/15/2002 00946.87500 - 00947.12500 41-15-01.3 N GA NE 083-17-53.0 W 0000810838 RTG Radio, LLC Valdosta 03/15/2002 00949.00000 30-50-15.0 N FL NE 082-32-13.4 W 0000810954 Seven Rivers Broadcast Minisrty, Inc. Crystal River 03/15/2002 00948.00000 28-53-16.9 N Page 5 AS - Aural Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City AR NE 094-09-38.7 W 0000811064
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221156A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221156A1.txt
    • Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City AZ MD WPED587 110-46-53.3 W 0000814202 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 4, INC. TUCSON 03/18/2002 00860.57500 32-26-31.3 N AZ MD WPED587 110-46-53.3 W 0000814202 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 4, INC. TUCSON 03/18/2002 00860.57500 32-26-31.3 N AZ MD WPED587 109-36-27.2 W 0000814202 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 4, INC. WILLCOX 03/18/2002 00860.57500 32-13-01.3 N AZ MD WPED587 109-36-27.2 W 0000814202 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 4, INC. WILLCOX 03/18/2002 00860.57500 32-13-01.3 N MD WPKL354 A 0000814211 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 4, INC. 03/18/2002 00806.00000 - 00821.00000 MD WPKL354 A 0000814211 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 4, INC. 03/18/2002 00810.51250 IL MD WPKL354 X 0000814211 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 4, INC. 03/18/2002 00810.51250 IL MD WPKL354 087-37-21.2 W 0000814211 NEXTEL
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221304A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221304A1.txt
    • LLC DOZIER 03/28/2002 19375.00000 38-17-07.6 N Page 4 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA AM WHO968 121-50-01.8 W 0000776320 M.U.T. Licensing, LLC DOZIER 03/25/2002 19375.00000 38-17-07.6 N AZ AM 111-07-37.4 W 0000777082 SOUTHWEST TRANSMISSION COOPERATIVE INC MARANA 03/21/2002 06675.00000 32-24-01.3 N AZ AM 112-27-32.2 W 0000782447 CNG COMMUNICATIONS, INC. PRESCOTT 03/27/2002 11215.00000 34-36-14.0 N PR AM 066-15-38.4 W 0000786962 Centennial Puerto Rico License Corp. Aibonito 03/28/2002 06315.84000 18-07-28.4 N PR AM 066-15-38.4 W 0000786962 Centennial Puerto Rico License Corp. Aibonito 03/28/2002 06585.00000 18-07-28.4 N PR AM 066-15-38.4 W 0000786962 Centennial Puerto Rico License Corp. Aibonito 03/28/2002 11642.50000 18-07-28.4 N PR
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221450A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221450A1.txt
    • add AMC-4 at 101 W.L. as a point of communication and not AMSC-1. This information will be updated in the database upon grant of license. Emission designator 29M567D should be 29M5G7D. The original public notice date of April 3, 2002 will remain the same. INFORMATIVE E950025 SES-MOD-20001206-02282 VERESTAR, INC. ( d/b/a ATC TELEPORTS, INC. ) Verestar, Inc., pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, requests a waiver of Section 2.106, Footnote NG 169, of the Commission's Rules so as to accept its earth station application nunc pro tunc as filed as of December 1, 2002, and therefore afforded a co-primary allocation status with the fixed service. E970267 SES-MOD-20001206-02283 VERESTAR, INC. ( d/b/a ATC TELEPORTS, INC. ) Verestar, Inc., pursuant to
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221659A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221659A1.txt
    • overnight delivery service other than U.S. Postal Service Express and Priority Mail. AF - Aeronautical and Fixed State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City GA MD KIV3 084-38-14.7 W 0000842717 COUNTY OF DECATUR BAINBRIDGE 03/25/2002 00122.80000 30-50-13.7 N TX NE 098-28-11.2 W 0000839710 Aeronautical Radio Inc San Antonio 04/08/2002 00131.45000 29-32-01.3 N MA NE 071-17-20.5 W 0000839722 Aeronautical Radio Inc Bedford 04/08/2002 00129.82500 42-28-11.8 N NY NE 077-40-20.5 W 0000839742 Aeronautical Radio Inc Rochester 04/08/2002 00130.95000 43-07-07.9 N GM NE 093-22-17.5 W 0000839755 Aeronautical Radio Inc Gulf of Mexico 04/08/2002 00130.55000 28-15-32.9 N FL NE 080-10-14.5 W 0000839762 Aeronautical Radio Inc Fort Lauderdale 04/08/2002 00131.27500 26-11-50.2 N Page 1 AF -
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221823A1.txt
    • WPHS657 079-52-30.0 W 0000853916 LAWRENCE JR., RONDALL L MORGANTOWN 04/17/2002 00462.92500 39-35-18.0 N WV MD WPHS657 081-18-31.4 W 0000853916 LAWRENCE JR., RONDALL L MOSSY 04/17/2002 00462.92500 37-56-53.4 N WV MD WPHK674 081-29-36.1 W 0000855782 LAWRENCE JR., RONDALL L Charleston 04/18/2002 00157.74000 39-18-49.6 N WV MD WPHK674 081-29-36.1 W 0000855782 LAWRENCE JR., RONDALL L Charleston 04/18/2002 00157.74000 39-18-49.6 N WV NE 081-33-01.3 W 0000853915 LAWRENCE JR., RONDALL L BELLE 04/17/2002 00157.74000 38-14-29.0 N OH NE 082-10-24.5 W 0000853915 LAWRENCE JR., RONDALL L Kanauga 04/17/2002 00157.74000 38-50-44.2 N WV NE 080-33-56.1 W 0000853915 LAWRENCE JR., RONDALL L PICKAWAY 04/17/2002 00157.74000 37-37-55.1 N OH NE 082-57-28.6 W 0000853915 LAWRENCE JR., RONDALL L PORTSMOUTH 04/17/2002 00157.74000 38-45-30.3 N Page 29 IK - Industrial/Business Pool -
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-222214A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-222214A1.txt
    • BROADCASTING INC 00951 .ooooo NICOLET BROADCASTING INC 00951.12500 BBK Broadcasting, Inc. 00946.00000 ROBERT C. CORDARO, INC. 00946.87500 ROBERT C. CORDARO, INC. 00947.12500 Panhandle Broadcasting, Inc. 00945.00000 Westwood 39-02-I 7.0 N Westwood 39-02-I 7.0 N Westwood 39-02-17.0 N Westwood 39-02-I 7.0 N WESTWOOD 39-02-I 7.0 N WESTWOOD 39-02-17.0 N Sturgeon Bay 44-49-05.0 N Sturgeon Bay 44-49-05.0 N Mayville 43-29-50.0 N WILKES-BARRE 41-15-01.3 N WILKES-BARRE 41-15-01.3 N Scottsbluff 41-59-48.9 N State Longitude KS 094-36-57.0 W KS 094-36-57.0 W KS 094-36-57.0 W KS 094-36-57.0 W KS 094-36-57.0 W KS 094-36-57.0 W WI 087-25-36.0 W WI 087-25-36.0 W WI 088-32-45.4 W PA 075-49-30.7 w PA 075-49-30.7 w NE 103-38-01 .O W CA 120-39-I 7.0 w CA 120-38-29.0 W AM AM AM AM WGR856 AM AM
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-222502A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-222502A1.txt
    • City AR NE 092-48-31.9 W 0000882323 COMMTRONIX, LLC CAMDEN 05/09/2002 00929.08750 33-34-08.2 N AR NE 091-29-49.9 W 0000882323 COMMTRONIX, LLC DUMAS 05/09/2002 00929.08750 33-53-44.3 N AR NE 092-42-13.0 W 0000882323 COMMTRONIX, LLC EL DORADO 05/09/2002 00929.08750 33-16-19.0 N AR NE 093-08-10.0 W 0000882323 COMMTRONIX, LLC MAGNOLIA 05/09/2002 00929.08750 33-11-28.0 N AR NE 091-22-51.4 W 0000882323 COMMTRONIX, LLC McGEHEE 05/09/2002 00929.08750 33-36-01.3 N GA RM WNZP838 084-31-41.8 W 0000881505 Lockheed Martin Corporation MARIETTA 05/09/2002 00929.03750 33-55-37.4 N GX - SMR, 806-821/851-866 MHz, Conventional State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City AM WBS426 A 0000751315 NEXTEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC. 05/07/2002 00806.00000 - 00821.00000 AM WBS426 A 0000751315 NEXTEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC. 05/07/2002 00809.53750
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-222893A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-222893A1.txt
    • 22075.00000 47-13-58.3 N WA MD WPOQ370 122-25-42.4 W 0000893136 WASHINGTON, STATE OF; Dept. of Transportation TACOMA 05/20/2002 22075.00000 47-13-58.3 N Page 29 MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City WA MD WPOQ378 122-26-01.4 W 0000893146 WASHINGTON, STATE OF; Dept. of Transportation TACOMA 05/20/2002 21825.00000 47-14-01.3 N WA MD WPOQ378 122-26-01.4 W 0000893146 WASHINGTON, STATE OF; Dept. of Transportation TACOMA 05/20/2002 21875.00000 47-14-01.3 N WA MD WPOQ378 122-26-01.4 W 0000893146 WASHINGTON, STATE OF; Dept. of Transportation TACOMA 05/20/2002 22025.00000 47-14-01.3 N WA MD WPOQ378 122-26-01.4 W 0000893146 WASHINGTON, STATE OF; Dept. of Transportation TACOMA 05/20/2002 22125.00000 47-14-01.3 N WA MD WPOQ378 122-26-01.4 W 0000893146 WASHINGTON, STATE
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-223094A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-223094A1.txt
    • WPKW936 0000901582 SACRAMENTO, COUNTY OF 05/28/2002 IK - Industrial/Business Pool - Commercial, Conventional State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NY AM 074-01-54.5 W 0000678329 CENTRAL VERMONT COMMUNICATIONSLAKE PLACID 05/28/2002 00157.74000 44-15-15.2 N LA AM WNWE699 091-06-40.0 W 0000795710 Satellink Paging, LLC BATON ROUGE 05/31/2002 00075.46000 30-23-52.0 N WV AM 081-33-01.3 W 0000853915 LAWRENCE JR., RONDALL L BELLE 05/28/2002 00157.74000 38-14-29.0 N OH AM 082-10-24.5 W 0000853915 LAWRENCE JR., RONDALL L Kanauga 05/28/2002 00157.74000 38-50-44.2 N WV AM 080-33-56.1 W 0000853915 LAWRENCE JR., RONDALL L PICKAWAY 05/28/2002 00157.74000 37-37-55.1 N OH AM 082-57-28.6 W 0000853915 LAWRENCE JR., RONDALL L PORTSMOUTH 05/28/2002 00157.74000 38-45-30.3 N WV AM 080-49-44.4 W 0000853915 LAWRENCE JR.,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-223320A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-223320A1.txt
    • 073-03-54.3 W 0000915961 MASSACHUSETTS, COMMONWEALTH OFWINDSOR 06/07/2002 06256.54000 42-30-11.3 N MA AM KCE44 073-15-59.3 W 0000915988 MASSACHUSETTS, COMMONWEALTH OFMONTEREY 06/07/2002 00959.70000 42-13-09.3 N MA AM KCE44 073-15-59.3 W 0000915988 MASSACHUSETTS, COMMONWEALTH OFMONTEREY 06/07/2002 05974.85000 42-13-09.3 N MA AM KCE44 073-15-59.3 W 0000915988 MASSACHUSETTS, COMMONWEALTH OFMONTEREY 06/07/2002 06034.15000 42-13-09.3 N MA AM WAA734 071-23-35.2 W 0000916583 MASSACHUSETTS, COMMONWEALTH OFCONCORD 06/07/2002 05974.85000 42-28-01.3 N MA AM WAA734 071-23-35.2 W 0000916583 MASSACHUSETTS, COMMONWEALTH OFCONCORD 06/07/2002 05974.85000 42-28-01.3 N Page 39 MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City AK MD WNEE908 146-32-53.4 W 0000911008 ALASKA, STATE OF CANYON CREEK 06/03/2002 06595.00000 64-18-19.5 N AK MD WNEE908 146-32-53.4 W 0000911008
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-223529A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-223529A1.txt
    • N AZ AM WNEF839 111-05-05.3 W 0000809837 TUCSON, CITY OF TUCSON 06/11/2002 00928.41250 32-14-23.2 N AZ AM WNEF839 111-05-05.3 W 0000809837 TUCSON, CITY OF TUCSON 06/11/2002 00928.41875 32-14-23.2 N AZ AM WNEF839 111-05-05.3 W 0000809837 TUCSON, CITY OF TUCSON 06/11/2002 00952.41250 32-14-23.2 N AZ AM WNEF839 111-05-05.3 W 0000809837 TUCSON, CITY OF TUCSON 06/11/2002 00952.41875 32-14-23.2 N CA AM WNTW562 119-13-01.3 W 0000850785 VENTURA, COUNTY OF VENTURA 06/10/2002 22225.00000 34-16-13.0 N CA AM WNTW562 119-13-01.3 W 0000850785 VENTURA, COUNTY OF VENTURA 06/10/2002 22375.00000 34-16-13.0 N CA AM 119-12-46.0 W 0000850860 Ventura, County of Ventura 06/10/2002 23425.00000 34-15-54.0 N CA AM 119-12-46.0 W 0000850860 Ventura, County of Ventura 06/10/2002 23575.00000 34-15-54.0 N CO AM WNEL574 105-06-52.9 W 0000882389 PARK, COUNTY OF DECKERS
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-223723A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-223723A1.txt
    • OF TUCSON 06/18/2002 00952.38125 32-21-40.2 N AZ AM WNEQ239 110-55-12.3 W 0000809838 TUCSON, CITY OF TUCSON 06/18/2002 00952.51250 32-21-40.2 N AZ AM WNEQ239 110-55-12.3 W 0000809838 TUCSON, CITY OF TUCSON 06/18/2002 00952.51875 32-21-40.2 N AZ AM 109-52-11.7 W 0000825487 Cochise, County of BISBEE 06/20/2002 06685.62500 31-25-59.2 N OR AM KJV67 121-20-00.7 W 0000882838 State of Oregon THE DALLES 06/19/2002 00956.95000 45-37-01.3 N OR AM KJV67 121-20-00.7 W 0000882838 State of Oregon THE DALLES 06/19/2002 06825.00000 45-37-01.3 N OR AM KJV67 121-20-00.7 W 0000882838 State of Oregon THE DALLES 06/19/2002 06855.00000 45-37-01.3 N OR AM KJV68 121-07-44.0 W 0000882970 State of Oregon THE DALLES 06/19/2002 00953.35000 45-36-26.8 N OR AM KJV68 121-07-44.0 W 0000882970 State of Oregon THE DALLES 06/19/2002 06665.00000 45-36-26.8
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-224213A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-224213A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-224213A2.txt
    • law provisions applicable to mergers are contained in section 1 of the Sherman Act and section 7 of the Clayton Act. 47 U.S.C. sections 214, 310 and 314. U.S. Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission, Horizontal Merger Guidelines, 57 Fed. Reg. 41557 (April 2, 1992, as revised April 8, 1997), http://www.ftc.gov/bc/docs/horizmer.htm. DoJ/FTC Merger Guidelines �1.1, ``Market Definition''.. Ibid. Ibid., �1.3, ``Identification of Firms that Participate in the Relevant Market.'' The Guidelines necessarily consider the possibility of supply response. Ibid. �1.5, ``Concentration and Market Shares''. Ibid. 5 U.S.C. �551 et seq. 47 U.S.C. 409(e): ``... the Commission shall have the power to require by subpena (sic) the attendance and testimony of witnesses and the production of all books, papers, schedules of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-224395A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-224395A1.txt
    • TROY 07/08/2002 39-02-18.6 N MO MD KNKN575 090-58-22.1 W 0000953628 Missouri RSA 8 Limited Partnership TROY 07/08/2002 39-02-18.6 N WY MD WPUD593 106-34-23.0 W 0000954513 Excomm, LLC Encampment 07/09/2002 41-07-40.0 N FL MD KNKN584 084-59-13.0 W 0000957930 ALLTEL Communications, Inc. APALACHICOLA 07/10/2002 29-43-50.0 N FL MD KNKN584 084-39-42.0 W 0000957930 ALLTEL Communications, Inc. CARRABELLE 07/10/2002 29-51-02.0 N FL MD KNKN584 085-18-01.3 W 0000957930 ALLTEL Communications, Inc. Port St. Joe 07/10/2002 29-48-42.5 N NM MD KNKN217 106-14-54.0 W 0000959387 WWC License L.L.C. BINGHAM 07/11/2002 33-49-34.0 N NM MD KNKA332 106-42-16.1 W 0000959430 ALLTEL Communications of the Southwest Limited Partnership BELEN 07/11/2002 34-39-19.2 N NM MD KNKA332 106-46-26.1 W 0000959430 ALLTEL Communications of the Southwest Limited Partnership BERNARDO 07/11/2002 34-26-08.2 N NM MD
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-224621A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-224621A1.txt
    • Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City PA NE 075-14-28.1 W 0000964174 Aeronautical Radio Inc Philadelphia 07/16/2002 00136.52500 39-52-19.0 N MI NE 084-35-14.4 W 0000964459 Aeronautical Radio Inc Lansing 07/16/2002 00136.52500 42-46-43.3 N TX NE 096-51-06.3 W 0000964474 Aeronautical Radio Inc Dallas 07/16/2002 00129.37500 32-50-49.6 N TX NE 098-28-11.2 W 0000964484 Aeronautical Radio Inc San Antonio 07/16/2002 00130.52500 29-32-01.3 N CO NE 107-53-37.8 W 0000964579 Aeronautical Radio Inc Montrose 07/16/2002 00131.40000 38-30-31.9 N FL NE 080-38-44.9 W 0000964643 Aeronautical Radio Inc Melbourne 07/16/2002 00130.52500 28-06-09.9 N MS NE 088-46-11.6 W 0000964656 Aeronautical Radio Inc Tupelo 07/16/2002 00129.62500 34-16-05.1 N MS NE 088-35-28.9 W 0000964677 Aeronautical Radio Inc Columbus 07/16/2002 00129.62500 33-27-01.2 N FL NE 080-09-09.9 W 0000964711 Aeronautical Radio
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-224861A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-224861A1.txt
    • File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA MD WMR242 122-01-41.9 W 0000971127 GTE MOBILNET OF CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP FAIRFIELD 07/22/2002 10587.50000 38-17-09.7 N CA MD WMQ872 122-10-25.0 W 0000971156 GTE MOBILNET OF CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP CORDELIA 07/22/2002 19640.00000 38-11-46.0 N RI MD WMR347 071-27-31.1 W 0000971271 SNET MOBILITY, LLC SOUTH KINGSTOWN 07/22/2002 06645.00000 41-29-53.4 N RI MD WLL933 071-34-01.3 W 0000971282 SNET MOBILITY, LLC WEST GREENWICH 07/22/2002 06805.00000 41-37-19.8 N IL MD WHT252 090-23-39.5 W 0000971722 ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE COMPANYGALENA 07/23/2002 02113.80000 42-24-03.0 N IL MD WHT252 090-23-39.5 W 0000971722 ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE COMPANYGALENA 07/23/2002 02124.60000 42-24-03.0 N IL MD WHT252 090-23-39.5 W 0000971722 ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE COMPANYGALENA 07/23/2002 02128.20000 42-24-03.0 N IL MD WHT252 090-23-39.5 W 0000971722 ILLINOIS
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-225008A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-225008A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-225008A2.txt
    • and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 476 (2000); 700 MHz Second Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 5299 (2000). 27 MHz Service Rules Order, FCC 02-152 � 40. 70/80/90 GHz Proceeding, WT Docket No. 02-146, RM-10288 � 79. 800 MHz NPRM, 17 FCC Rcd 4873, 4911 � 70 (2002). 4.9 GHz Proceeding, 17 FCC Rcd at 3978-79. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925 (Permits waiver of the Commission Rules in extraordinary or unusual circumstances). See 47 U.S.C. � 309(f); 47 C.F.R. � 1.931(b). See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925. The six frequency pairs involved were 896.8875/935.8875 MHz, 896.9375/935.9375 MHz, 896.9875/935.9875 MHz, 897.8875/9375 MHz, 897.9375/936.9375 MHz, and 897.9875/936.9875 MHz. See, e.g., Petition of Association of American Railroads (AAR) for Modification of Licenses For
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-225135A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-225135A1.txt
    • Communications, Inc. RAPID CITY 07/23/2002 06315.84000 44-05-11.9 N CA MD WMR242 122-01-41.9 W 0000971127 GTE MOBILNET OF CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP FAIRFIELD 07/22/2002 10587.50000 38-17-09.7 N CA MD WMQ872 122-10-25.0 W 0000971156 GTE MOBILNET OF CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP CORDELIA 07/22/2002 19640.00000 38-11-46.0 N RI MD WMR347 071-27-31.1 W 0000971271 SNET MOBILITY, LLC SOUTH KINGSTOWN 07/22/2002 06645.00000 41-29-53.4 N RI MD WLL933 071-34-01.3 W 0000971282 SNET MOBILITY, LLC WEST GREENWICH 07/22/2002 06805.00000 41-37-19.8 N IL MD WHT252 090-23-39.5 W 0000971722 ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE COMPANYGALENA 07/23/2002 02113.80000 42-24-03.0 N IL MD WHT252 090-23-39.5 W 0000971722 ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE COMPANYGALENA 07/23/2002 02124.60000 42-24-03.0 N IL MD WHT252 090-23-39.5 W 0000971722 ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE COMPANYGALENA 07/23/2002 02128.20000 42-24-03.0 N IL MD WHT252 090-23-39.5 W 0000971722 ILLINOIS
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-225574A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-225574A1.txt
    • MD WNEL596 074-50-20.5 W 0000997807 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF WEST TRENTON 08/15/2002 06063.80000 40-15-48.3 N NJ MD WNEL596 074-50-20.5 W 0000997807 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF WEST TRENTON 08/15/2002 06775.00000 40-15-48.3 N NJ MD WNEL596 074-50-20.5 W 0000997807 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF WEST TRENTON 08/15/2002 06845.00000 40-15-48.3 N NJ MD WNEL597 074-43-01.5 W 0000997850 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF BORDENTOWN 08/15/2002 06315.84000 40-08-01.3 N NJ MD WNEL597 074-43-01.5 W 0000997850 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF BORDENTOWN 08/15/2002 06615.00000 40-08-01.3 N NJ MD WNEL597 074-43-01.5 W 0000997850 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF BORDENTOWN 08/15/2002 06685.00000 40-08-01.3 N CA MD KNF72 121-35-09.9 W 0000997995 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF MARYSVILLE 08/15/2002 06675.00000 39-08-37.6 N CA MD KNF72 121-35-09.9 W 0000997995 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF MARYSVILLE 08/15/2002 06745.00000 39-08-37.6 N CA
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226234A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226234A1.txt
    • application is not in conformance with the Commission's rules or its policies. Petitions, oppositions and other pleadings filed in response to this notice should conform to Section 25.154 of the Commission's rules, unless otherwise noted. 47 C.F.R. � 25.154. Amendment Constellation Communications Holdings, Inc. S2113 SAT-AMD-20020828-00160E On August 8, 2000, Constellation Communications Holdings, Inc. filed a request pursuant to Section 1.3 and Section 25.117(e) of the Commission's Rules, for a limited waiver of the milestones specified in Constellation's authorization to construct, launch and operate a mobile satellite system in frequencies above 1 GHz. That Limited Waiver Request remains pending before the Commission. On August 29, 2001, Constellation filed an amendment to the Limited Waiver Request asking that the Commission specify different
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A17.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A17.txt
    • BASE: RESPONDENTS WHO GET NEWS FROM BROADCAST TELEVISION TOTAL ----- UNWEIGHTED TOTAL 2066 WEIGHTED TOTAL 134350 (000) 100.0 LOCAL NEWS 27.4 NBC NIGHTLY NEWS 26.5 ABC NIGHTLY NEWS 21.4 CBS EVENING NEWS 18.3 TODAY SHOW 3.8 DATELINE NBC 3.7 60 MINUTES 3.6 GOOD MORNING AMERICA 3.1 FOX NEWS 3.0 20/20 2.9 48 HOURS 2.0 NIGHTLINE 1.7 NEWSHOUR WITH JIM LEHRER 1.3 DATA BASED UPON FEWER THAN 145 RESPONDENTS DO NOT MEET MINIMUM REPORTING STANDARDS AND ARE SUPPLIED FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY. RESPONSES MAY ADD TO MORE THAN 100% DUE TO MULTIPLE RESPONSES COPYRIGHT 2002 NIELSEN MEDIA RESEARCH, INC. NIELSEN MEDIA RESEARCH PAGE: 18 FCC PHONE SURVEY AUGUST 23-SEPTEMBER 1; 3-5, 2002 TABLE 017 (continued) Q7. WHAT ARE THE NAMES OF THE
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A22.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A22.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A22.txt
    • The Television Bureau of Advertising provides an analysis of ``season-to-date'' network ratings, covering the period from August 27, 2001-May 26, 2002. It shows the following prime time ratings for the major broadcast networks: NBC 8.6, CBS 8.0, ABC 6.4, and Fox 5.0. The corresponding figures for the top four cable networks are: Lifetime 1.7, TBS 1.4, TNT 1.4, and USA 1.3. The same source provides a listing of the top 100 programs on broadcast and cable for various periods. The May 2002 compilation reveals that 92 of the top 100 programs were on broadcast television. The top five were all broadcast programs. Their ratings ranged from 12.8-16.0. The highest-rated cable program was number 76, and the ratings for the top five
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226886A1.txt
    • W 0001039879 PORTER, COUNTY OF Valparaiso 09/25/2002 17760.00000 41-28-03.8 N IN NE 087-03-36.2 W 0001039879 PORTER, COUNTY OF Valparaiso 09/25/2002 17920.00000 41-28-03.8 N IN NE 087-03-36.2 W 0001039879 PORTER, COUNTY OF Valparaiso 09/25/2002 18000.00000 41-28-03.8 N IN NE 087-01-29.4 W 0001039906 Porter, County of VALPARAISO 09/25/2002 19320.00000 41-26-33.0 N IN NE 087-03-45.6 W 0001039935 Porter, County of Valparaiso 09/25/2002 19560.00000 41-28-01.3 N IN NE 087-11-05.1 W 0001039976 Porter, County of Valparaiso 09/25/2002 19480.00000 41-32-53.0 N CA RM WNEQ770 117-22-29.1 W 0001039558 RIVERSIDE, CITY OF RIVERSIDE 09/25/2002 18590.00000 33-58-54.0 N CA RM WNEQ770 117-22-29.1 W 0001039558 RIVERSIDE, CITY OF RIVERSIDE 09/25/2002 18590.00000 33-58-54.0 N CA RM WNEQ770 117-22-29.1 W 0001039558 RIVERSIDE, CITY OF RIVERSIDE 09/25/2002 18590.00000 33-58-54.0 N CA RM WNEQ772 117-24-37.1
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-227409A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-227409A1.txt
    • 0001055483 Aeronautical Radio Inc Ontario 10/11/2002 00136.85000 34-03-21.6 N IL NE 090-30-27.1 W 0001055512 Aeronautical Radio Inc Moline 10/11/2002 00136.85000 41-26-54.7 N MI NE 085-33-07.4 W 0001055527 Aeronautical Radio Inc Kalamazoo 10/11/2002 00136.85000 42-14-05.5 N NY NE 076-02-22.7 W 0001055538 Aeronautical Radio Inc Syracuse 10/11/2002 00136.97500 43-06-40.2 N TX NE 098-28-11.2 W 0001055543 Aeronautical Radio Inc San Antonio 10/11/2002 00136.97500 29-32-01.3 N TX NE 102-12-06.8 W 0001055560 Aeronautical Radio Inc Midland 10/11/2002 00136.97500 31-56-33.1 N Page 2 AF - Aeronautical and Fixed State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City ME NE 068-49-41.3 W 0001055570 Aeronautical Radio Inc Bangor 10/11/2002 00136.97500 44-48-26.8 N MI NE 085-34-56.0 W 0001055579 Aeronautical Radio Inc Traverse
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-227907A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-227907A1.txt
    • Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MD KB97183 A 0001064239 Monterey Licenses, LLC 10/21/2002 00161.67000 MD KB97183 A 0001064239 Monterey Licenses, LLC 10/21/2002 00161.73000 SD MD KB97183 103-14-47.0 W 0001064239 Monterey Licenses, LLC RAPID CITY 10/21/2002 00450.80000 44-02-49.0 N SD MD KB97183 103-14-47.0 W 0001064239 Monterey Licenses, LLC RAPID CITY 10/21/2002 00455.80000 44-02-49.0 N OH MD KPL531 080-50-01.3 W 0001070397 CITICASTERS LICENSES, INC. LISBON 10/25/2002 00455.51250 40-46-48.2 N OH MD KPL531 080-50-01.3 W 0001070397 CITICASTERS LICENSES, INC. LISBON 10/25/2002 00455.51250 40-46-48.2 N OH MD KPL531 080-46-59.3 W 0001070397 CITICASTERS LICENSES, INC. LISBON 10/25/2002 00455.51250 40-47-30.2 N PA MD KPL531 080-20-42.2 W 0001070397 CITICASTERS LICENSES, INC. NEW CASTLE 10/25/2002 00455.51250 41-00-18.5 N OH MD KPL531 080-43-52.3 W 0001070397 CITICASTERS
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228408A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228408A1.txt
    • SOUTH CAROLINA RSA NO. 7 CELLULAR GENERAL PARTNERSHIP d/b/a ALLTEL BARNWELL 11/05/2002 05945.20000 33-09-52.5 N SC MD WMN354 081-26-34.4 W 0001082202 SOUTH CAROLINA RSA NO. 7 CELLULAR GENERAL PARTNERSHIP d/b/a ALLTEL BARNWELL 11/05/2002 06004.50000 33-09-52.5 N SC MD WMN354 081-26-34.4 W 0001082202 SOUTH CAROLINA RSA NO. 7 CELLULAR GENERAL PARTNERSHIP d/b/a ALLTEL BARNWELL 11/05/2002 06735.00000 33-09-52.5 N SC MD WMN357 080-54-01.3 W 0001082215 SOUTH CAROLINA RSA NO. 7 CELLULAR GENERAL PARTNERSHIP d/b/a ALLTEL ORANGEBURG 11/05/2002 06063.80000 33-34-38.6 N SC MD WMN357 080-54-01.3 W 0001082215 SOUTH CAROLINA RSA NO. 7 CELLULAR GENERAL PARTNERSHIP d/b/a ALLTEL ORANGEBURG 11/05/2002 06123.10000 33-34-38.6 N IL MD WLB374 089-54-53.8 W 0001082351 CYBERTEL CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY EDWARDSVILLE 11/06/2002 02166.80000 38-46-24.3 N IL MD WLB374 089-54-53.8 W 0001082351 CYBERTEL
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228932A1.txt
    • AT&T Wireless Services of Florida, Inc. MIAMI 11/22/2002 10895.00000 25-55-24.0 N FL MD WLB702 080-19-41.0 W 0001099939 AT&T Wireless Services of Florida, Inc. MIAMI 11/22/2002 10975.00000 25-55-24.0 N FL MD WPSH310 080-17-23.0 W 0001099948 AT&T Wireless Services of Florida, Inc. SUNRISE 11/22/2002 06345.49000 26-11-02.0 N FL MD WLB704 080-29-23.2 W 0001099960 AT&T Wireless Services of Florida, Inc. TAMIAMI 11/22/2002 06063.80000 25-46-01.3 N WI MD WHT381 088-04-02.0 W 0001099998 UNITED STATES CELLULAR OPERATING COMPANY BROOKFIELD 11/22/2002 02120.00000 43-04-58.0 N WI MD WHT381 088-04-02.0 W 0001099998 UNITED STATES CELLULAR OPERATING COMPANY BROOKFIELD 11/22/2002 02123.20000 43-04-58.0 N WI MD WHT381 088-04-02.0 W 0001099998 UNITED STATES CELLULAR OPERATING COMPANY BROOKFIELD 11/22/2002 02126.00000 43-04-58.0 N WI MD WHT381 088-04-02.0 W 0001099998 UNITED STATES CELLULAR OPERATING COMPANY
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-229376A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-229376A1.txt
    • N CT MD KNKA256 073-33-47.3 W 0001106278 Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, LLC STAMFORD 12/02/2002 41-03-08.0 N CT MD KNKA256 073-25-51.4 W 0001106278 Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, LLC WESTPORT 12/02/2002 41-04-53.0 N CT MD KNKA256 073-19-42.5 W 0001106278 Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, LLC WESTPORT 12/02/2002 41-10-18.0 N CT MD KNKA418 072-14-32.6 W 0001106300 Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, LLC EAST LYME 12/02/2002 41-22-01.3 N CT MD KNKA418 072-00-34.8 W 0001106300 Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, LLC Groton 12/02/2002 41-20-36.8 N CT MD KNKA418 071-55-38.4 W 0001106300 Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, LLC NORTH STONINGTON 12/02/2002 41-27-35.4 N CT MD KNKA418 071-54-06.5 W 0001106300 Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, LLC STONINGTON 12/02/2002 41-22-58.2 N CT MD KNKA241 072-49-10.9 W 0001106351 Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, LLC BRANFORD 12/02/2002
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-229740A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-229740A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-229740A1.txt
    • D.C. - Today, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) announced that it voted to approve BellSouth's joint application to provide in-region, interLATA service originating in Florida and Tennessee. Approval of BellSouth's application promises benefits to consumers in Florida and Tennessee by making increased competition in all markets for telecommunications services possible. BellSouth stated in its application that competing carriers provide approximately 1.3 million lines in Florida, which account for 18% of the total lines in the state, and nearly 364 thousand lines in Tennessee, accounting for nearly 13% of the total lines in the state. With the FCC's approval of BellSouth's joint application for Florida and Tennessee and SBC's application for California, which was also adopted today, the percentage of Bell Operating
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-229919A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-229919A1.txt
    • NE MD KAZ46 097-11-15.1 W 0001129389 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANYBELLWOOD 12/19/2002 06004.50000 41-18-30.0 N GM MD WEE457 091-32-17.3 W 0001129441 Chevron USA Inc. MORGAN CITY 12/19/2002 00959.15000 28-12-09.8 N NE MD KAZ47 097-48-41.1 W 0001129488 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANYGENOA 12/19/2002 06197.24000 41-25-05.0 N GM MD WNEU298 091-40-09.3 W 0001129589 CHEVRON USA INC OFFSHORE 12/19/2002 00943.17500 28-07-05.9 N GM MD WNEU297 091-40-01.3 W 0001129606 CHEVRON USA INC OFFSHORE 12/19/2002 00942.17500 28-08-10.9 N NE MD KAZ48 097-59-47.2 W 0001129994 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANYCENTRAL CITY 12/20/2002 05945.20000 41-02-37.0 N Page 26 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NE MD KAZ48 097-59-47.2 W 0001129994 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANYCENTRAL CITY
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-230456A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-230456A1.txt
    • Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TX NE 095-20-23.0 W 0001154588 Aeronautical Radio Inc Houston 01/13/2003 00129.42500 29-58-49.7 N GA NE 083-57-44.0 W 0001154592 Aeronautical Radio Inc Lawrenceville 01/13/2003 00130.52500 33-58-41.1 N MI NE 086-14-48.9 W 0001154597 Aeronautical Radio Inc Manistee 01/13/2003 00136.60000 44-16-20.7 N TX NE 098-28-11.2 W 0001154625 Aeronautical Radio Inc San Antonio 01/13/2003 00129.60000 29-32-01.3 N WI NE 088-31-10.1 W 0001154647 Aeronautical Radio Inc Appleton 01/13/2003 00131.75000 44-15-26.7 N NE NE 096-45-33.3 W 0001154672 Aeronautical Radio Inc Lincoln 01/13/2003 00131.75000 40-51-03.5 N NY NE 076-53-29.2 W 0001154701 Aeronautical Radio Inc Elmira 01/13/2003 00131.75000 42-09-35.7 N WA NE 122-54-07.9 W 0001154723 Aeronautical Radio Inc Olympia 01/13/2003 00129.62500 46-58-13.8 N WY NE 105-32-21.7 W 0001154751 Aeronautical Radio
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231163A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231163A1.txt
    • LANCASTER ED BROADASTING FOUNDATION LANCASTER 02/03/2003 00945.12500 39-42-44.4 N CO MD WLI648 104-47-46.0 W 0001186136 EDUCATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS OF COLORADO SPRINGS, INC. COLORADO SPRINGS 02/05/2003 00945.50000 38-56-39.6 N TN MD WPNB887 082-50-52.0 W 0001188711 RADIO GREENEVILLE, INC. GREENVILLE 02/07/2003 00946.00000 36-10-10.0 N NH MD WLI687 072-15-10.3 W 0001188855 CLEAR CHANNEL BROADCASTING LICENSES, INC. LEBANON 02/07/2003 00949.00000 43-38-32.2 N VT MD WHQ225 072-28-01.3 W 0001190093 CAPSTAR TX LIMITED PARTNERSHIP HARTLAND 02/07/2003 00948.00000 43-36-17.3 N MI NE 084-32-45.7 W 0001183034 MID MICHIGAN FM, INC. Lansing 02/03/2003 00950.50000 42-47-58.2 N MI NE 084-32-45.7 W 0001183188 MID MICHIGAN FM, INC. Lansing 02/03/2003 00944.32500 42-47-58.2 N MI NE 084-32-45.7 W 0001183188 MID MICHIGAN FM, INC. Lansing 02/03/2003 00944.62500 42-47-58.2 N TX NE 099-44-05.0 W 0001183933 GOSPEL RADIO
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231527A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231527A1.txt
    • MCKINLEY 02/18/2003 63-38-35.0 N AK MD KNKN204 149-04-50.0 W 0001199752 ACS Wireless License Sub, Inc. NENANA 02/18/2003 64-34-46.0 N Page 16 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City AK MD KNKN204 147-12-53.0 W 0001199752 ACS Wireless License Sub, Inc. NORTH POLE 02/18/2003 64-43-35.0 N AK MD KNKN204 146-33-01.3 W 0001199752 ACS Wireless License Sub, Inc. RICHARDSON 02/18/2003 64-18-09.6 N AK MD KNKN204 142-59-05.0 W 0001199752 ACS Wireless License Sub, Inc. TOK 02/18/2003 63-20-17.0 N AK MD KNKN204 144-03-53.0 W 0001199752 ACS Wireless License Sub, Inc. TOK JUNCTION 02/18/2003 63-38-56.0 N AK MD KNKQ398 151-47-10.0 W 0001199758 ACS Wireless License Sub, Inc. ANCHOR POINT 02/18/2003 59-52-52.0 N AK MD
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231723A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231723A1.txt
    • 0001215423 CLEAR CHANNEL BROADCASTING LICENSES, INC. LEBANON 02/28/2003 00945.50000 43-38-32.2 N TN MD WLE677 089-51-50.3 W 0001215427 Entercom Memphis License, LLC MEMPHIS 02/28/2003 00945.50000 35-06-15.3 N TN MD WLE675 089-52-06.3 W 0001215516 Entercom Memphis License, LLC MEMPHIS 02/28/2003 00944.50000 35-06-10.3 N NH MD WPON230 072-17-38.3 W 0001215584 CLEAR CHANNEL BROADCASTING LICENSES, INC. CLAREMONT 02/28/2003 00947.00000 43-23-45.3 N VT MD WPON231 072-28-01.3 W 0001215696 CLEAR CHANNEL BROADCASTING LICENSES, INC. HARTLAND 02/28/2003 00949.50000 43-36-17.3 N NE NE 099-22-19.0 W 0001207104 WMMP, LLC Holdrege 02/24/2003 00951.00000 40-26-17.3 N FL NE 080-05-36.0 W 0001208435 STAR OF THE PALM BEACHES, INC. West Palm Beach 02/24/2003 00947.37500 26-42-49.0 N Page 4 AS - Aural Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-232868A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-232868A1.txt
    • CRIGLERSVILLE 03/27/2003 00952.13125 38-25-39.4 N VA MD WNEI524 078-20-15.0 W 0001252124 RAPPAHANNOCK ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE CRIGLERSVILLE 03/27/2003 00952.61250 38-25-39.4 N NM MD WPJE559 103-14-22.4 W 0001254366 GTECH CORPORATION Midway 03/24/2003 00928.04375 34-15-08.4 N NM MD WPJE559 103-14-22.4 W 0001254366 GTECH CORPORATION Midway 03/24/2003 00952.04375 34-15-08.4 N TX MD WNTK774 095-38-11.8 W 0001254645 NATURAL GAS PIPELINE COMPANY OF AMERICA PARIS 03/28/2003 00957.55000 33-31-01.3 N TX NE 100-55-23.5 W 0001244407 A. O. SMITH DEL RIO 03/24/2003 21241.50000 29-21-38.0 N TX NE 106-19-39.5 W 0001244410 ELECTRONIC INTERCONNECT SYSTEMEL PASO 03/24/2003 22470.00000 31-44-44.0 N TX NE 106-17-45.0 W 0001244415 CAPSONIC AUTOMOTIVE INC. EL PASO 03/24/2003 22473.50000 31-43-18.0 N TX NE 106-18-37.0 W 0001244417 POLLAK CORP. EL PASO 03/24/2003 22477.00000 31-43-55.0 N TX NE 106-22-39.0 W 0001244418
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-233033A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-233033A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-233033A1.txt
    • of Michigan, Public Notice, DA 97-127 (Jan. 17, 1997); Revised Procedures for Bell Operating Company Applications Under Section 271 of the Communications Act, Public Notice, 13 FCC Rcd 17457 (Sept. 19, 1997); Updated Filing Requirements for Bell Operating Company Applications Under Section 271 of the Communications Act, Public Notice, DA-99-1994 (Sept. 28, 1999) (collectively ``271 Procedural Public Notices''). See section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Ameritech Michigan Order at 20575, para. 57; Application of Bell Atlantic New York for Authorization Under Section 271 of the Communications Act To Provide In-Region, InterLATA Service in the State of New York, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 3953, 3968, para. 34 (1999). See 271 Procedural Public Notices. See Public
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-233093A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-233093A1.txt
    • 37-50-30.9 N LA MD WPNJ391 090-13-08.0 W 0001261699 Sprint Spectrum L.P. NEW ORLEANS 04/03/2003 06765.00000 30-00-23.0 N LA MD WPNJ392 090-07-52.4 W 0001261982 Sprint Spectrum L.P. NEW ORLEANS 04/03/2003 06605.00000 30-09-03.7 N LA MD WPNJ392 090-07-52.4 W 0001261982 Sprint Spectrum L.P. NEW ORLEANS 04/03/2003 06685.00000 30-09-03.7 N LA MD WPOP890 090-06-48.7 W 0001262009 Sprint Spectrum L.P. NEW ORLEANS 04/03/2003 06845.00000 30-15-01.3 N CA MD WMS743 118-02-58.2 W 0001262596 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP WHITTIER 04/04/2003 10556.25000 33-56-34.0 N CA MD WLT431 118-02-27.2 W 0001262636 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP SANTA FE SPRINGS 04/04/2003 10621.25000 33-54-16.0 N FL MD WPJE658 082-26-47.0 W 0001262834 FLORIDA RSA #8, INC. GAINESVILLE 04/04/2003 06555.62500 29-41-13.0 N Page 2 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-233268A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-233268A1.txt
    • 0001266560 CONSOL ENERGY INC OAKWOOD 04/08/2003 00952.19375 37-10-38.8 N GA NE P 084-12-08.6 W 0001266591 ALBANY WATER, GAS & LIGHT COMMISSION Albany 04/08/2003 00956.43125 31-30-26.6 N ID NE 112-00-06.0 W 0001266667 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY LAVA HOT SPRINGS 04/08/2003 00932.40625 42-38-56.0 N ID NE 112-00-06.0 W 0001266667 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY LAVA HOT SPRINGS 04/08/2003 00941.40625 42-38-56.0 N ID NE 112-00-01.3 W 0001266761 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY BANCROFT 04/08/2003 00928.20625 42-44-38.1 N ID NE 112-00-01.3 W 0001266761 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY BANCROFT 04/08/2003 00952.20625 42-44-38.1 N CO NE 104-50-15.4 W 0001269929 University of Colorado Health Sciences Denver 04/10/2003 22525.00000 39-44-42.9 N NM NE 105-46-53.1 W 0001269955 Tri State Generation & Transmission Assoc., Inc. Ruidoso 04/10/2003 06636.25000 32-24-17.1 N TN NE 083-33-57.5
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-233490A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-233490A1.txt
    • MD WBG555 122-18-30.4 W 0001275411 INFINITY RADIO SUBSIDIARY OPERATIONS INC. Seattle 04/15/2003 00945.00000 47-36-56.3 N WA MD WHY474 122-20-30.8 W 0001275470 INFINITY RADIO SUBSIDIARY OPERATIONS INC. SEATTLE 04/15/2003 00950.50000 47-37-41.6 N WA MD WLI699 122-18-33.0 W 0001275508 INFINITY RADIO SUBSIDIARY OPERATIONS INC. SEATTLE 04/15/2003 00946.50000 47-36-55.0 N NY MD WMU494 073-59-30.5 W 0001275527 WPLJ-FM RADIO INC NEW YORK 04/15/2003 00950.50000 40-45-01.3 N NY MD KVK74 073-59-09.0 W 0001275622 WABC-AM RADIO, INC. NEW YORK CITY 04/15/2003 00948.00000 40-44-54.0 N NY MD KVK74 073-59-09.0 W 0001275622 WABC-AM RADIO, INC. NEW YORK CITY 04/15/2003 00948.00000 40-44-54.0 N WA MD WLP415 122-20-30.8 W 0001275623 INFINITY RADIO SUBSIDIARY OPERATIONS INC. SEATTLE 04/15/2003 00951.00000 47-37-41.6 N NJ MD WPNG790 074-50-38.0 W 0001275967 NEW JERSEY PUBLIC BROADCASTING AUTH.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-234729A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-234729A1.txt
    • California Inc. RANDSBURG 05/14/2003 06004.50000 35-21-05.8 N CA MD KMQ75 117-40-24.2 W 0001311811 Verizon California Inc. RANDSBURG 05/14/2003 06093.45000 35-21-05.8 N Page 9 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MA MD WPNK740 071-17-44.2 W 0001312816 Cellco Partnership Bedford 05/15/2003 10648.12500 42-29-01.3 N WA MD WPNE376 120-20-06.0 W 0001312838 RCC Minnesota, Inc WENATCHEE 05/15/2003 06555.00000 47-27-16.0 N WA MD WPNE376 120-20-06.0 W 0001312838 RCC Minnesota, Inc WENATCHEE 05/15/2003 22725.00000 47-27-16.0 N WA MD WPNE376 120-20-06.0 W 0001312838 RCC Minnesota, Inc WENATCHEE 05/15/2003 22975.00000 47-27-16.0 N WA MD WPNE374 120-14-22.2 W 0001312839 RCC Minnesota, Inc MALAGA 05/15/2003 06725.00000 47-19-09.4 N MA MD WLW562
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-234913A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-234913A1.txt
    • KAHLOTUS 05/22/2003 06845.00000 46-37-04.0 N CA MD WPNG275 116-06-06.0 W 0001321799 SAN DIEGO, COUNTY OF OCOTILLO 05/22/2003 06775.00000 32-37-59.2 N IL MD WNTJ684 088-25-11.2 W 0001321905 ILLINOIS, STATE OF MORRIS 05/22/2003 00928.49375 41-17-56.1 N IL MD WNTJ684 088-25-11.2 W 0001321905 ILLINOIS, STATE OF MORRIS 05/22/2003 00952.49375 41-17-56.1 N WA MD WNEU382 122-53-59.5 W 0001321991 WASHINGTON, STATE OF TUMWATER 05/22/2003 19280.00000 47-01-01.3 N WA MD WNEU382 122-53-59.5 W 0001321991 WASHINGTON, STATE OF TUMWATER 05/22/2003 19460.00000 47-01-01.3 N WA MD KCX70 123-40-07.0 W 0001322081 WASHINGTON, STATE OF JOYCE 05/22/2003 06004.50000 48-09-03.0 N WA MD KCX70 123-40-07.0 W 0001322081 WASHINGTON, STATE OF JOYCE 05/22/2003 06595.00000 48-09-03.0 N WA MD KCX70 123-40-07.0 W 0001322081 WASHINGTON, STATE OF JOYCE 05/22/2003 06645.00000 48-09-03.0 N WA MD KCX70
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-235105A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-235105A1.txt
    • MD AM WPNJ339 P 076-48-41.8 W 0001271541 VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMWALDORF 05/29/2003 00956.39375 38-44-25.4 N NC AM WPNJ340 P 075-43-32.6 W 0001271555 VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMMANNS HARBOR 05/29/2003 00956.39375 36-04-37.5 N NC AM WPNJ340 P 075-43-32.6 W 0001271555 VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMMANNS HARBOR 05/29/2003 00956.39375 36-04-37.5 N MA AM 071-06-12.7 W 0001272807 Partners Healthcare Boston 05/28/2003 22275.00000 42-20-01.3 N NE AM 096-42-41.1 W 0001274229 The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe RaLincoln 05/27/2003 19360.00000 40-48-55.7 N NE AM 096-42-41.1 W 0001274229 The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe RaLincoln 05/27/2003 19440.00000 40-48-55.7 N NV AM WPTS335 115-29-45.0 W 0001285877 Nevada Power Goodsprings 05/29/2003 06675.62500 35-53-40.9 N NV AM WPTS335 115-29-45.0 W 0001285877 Nevada Power Goodsprings 05/29/2003 10623.12500 35-53-40.9 N IL
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-235515A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-235515A1.txt
    • 44-59-04.4 N OR MD WIA283 119-48-27.1 W 0001348194 Portland General Electric Boardman 06/13/2003 06750.00000 45-41-38.4 N OR MD WIA283 119-48-27.1 W 0001348194 Portland General Electric Boardman 06/13/2003 06775.00000 45-41-38.4 N WA NE P 119-10-49.0 W 0001340320 Kennewick, City of Kennewick 06/09/2003 00956.31875 46-11-58.0 N WA NE P 119-10-49.0 W 0001340320 Kennewick, City of Kennewick 06/09/2003 00956.31875 46-11-58.0 N ID NE 112-00-01.3 W 0001340322 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANYBANCROFT 06/09/2003 00928.34375 42-44-38.1 N ID NE 112-00-01.3 W 0001340322 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANYBANCROFT 06/09/2003 00952.34375 42-44-38.1 N TX NE 096-53-29.9 W 0001340419 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANYBLOOMINGTON 06/09/2003 00932.31875 28-38-52.0 N TX NE 096-53-29.9 W 0001340419 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANYBLOOMINGTON 06/09/2003 00941.31875 28-38-52.0 N OR NE 123-05-11.4 W 0001340441 Salem, City of Salem 06/09/2003 00928.19375
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-235763A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-235763A1.txt
    • JACKSON 06/19/2003 06004.50000 43-29-24.7 N WY MD KVU91 110-57-22.7 W 0001355283 Corban Communications, Inc. JACKSON 06/19/2003 06034.15000 43-29-24.7 N WY MD KVU91 110-57-22.7 W 0001355283 Corban Communications, Inc. JACKSON 06/19/2003 06063.80000 43-29-24.7 N WY MD KVU91 110-57-22.7 W 0001355283 Corban Communications, Inc. JACKSON 06/19/2003 06093.45000 43-29-24.7 N LA MD WPOP890 090-06-48.7 W 0001355750 Sprint Spectrum L.P. NEW ORLEANS 06/20/2003 06845.00000 30-15-01.3 N LA MD WPNJ392 090-07-52.4 W 0001355775 Sprint Spectrum L.P. NEW ORLEANS 06/20/2003 06605.00000 30-09-03.7 N LA MD WPNJ392 090-07-52.4 W 0001355775 Sprint Spectrum L.P. NEW ORLEANS 06/20/2003 06685.00000 30-09-03.7 N MT MD KTQ95 115-03-18.6 W 0001356492 CITIZENS TELECOMMUNICATIONS COEUREKA 06/20/2003 06197.20000 48-52-57.8 N MT MD KTQ95 115-03-18.6 W 0001356492 CITIZENS TELECOMMUNICATIONS COEUREKA 06/20/2003 06315.84000 48-52-57.8 N IA NE 095-48-14.0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-236064A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-236064A1.txt
    • 0001364031 CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INC Graniteville 06/26/2003 00950.87500 - 00951.12500 44-07-32.0 N NC NE 080-46-15.0 W 0001365535 WHVN, INC. Charlotte 06/27/2003 00949.87500 35-15-48.0 N CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MA AM WPNK740 071-17-44.2 W 0001312816 Cellco Partnership Bedford 06/25/2003 10648.12500 42-29-01.3 N WA AM WPNE376 120-20-06.0 W 0001312838 RCC Minnesota, Inc WENATCHEE 06/23/2003 06555.00000 47-27-16.0 N WA AM WPNE376 120-20-06.0 W 0001312838 RCC Minnesota, Inc WENATCHEE 06/23/2003 22725.00000 47-27-16.0 N WA AM WPNE376 120-20-06.0 W 0001312838 RCC Minnesota, Inc WENATCHEE 06/23/2003 22975.00000 47-27-16.0 N MN MD WPNI857 094-50-24.0 W 0001357212 WWC Holding Co., Inc. LAKE LILLIAN 06/20/2003 05945.20000 44-57-59.0 N MN
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-236305A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-236305A1.txt
    • W 0001366580 Cellco Partnership North Pekin 06/30/2003 10587.50000 40-36-16.5 N Page 11 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NM NE 106-39-03.1 W 0001367833 AT&T CORP ALBUQUERQUE 07/01/2003 18135.00000 35-05-06.2 N NM NE 106-43-13.9 W 0001367834 AT&T CORP ALBUQUERQUE 07/01/2003 19695.00000 35-05-01.3 N NC NE 078-32-51.0 W 0001370307 NORTH CAROLINA RSA #9, INC. ELIZABETHTOWN 07/02/2003 06805.00000 34-38-59.6 N NC NE 078-02-03.7 W 0001370322 NORTH CAROLINA RSA #9, INC. Dudley 07/02/2003 06745.00000 35-17-52.3 N CA NE 121-39-36.4 W 0001371210 SOUTHWESTERN BELL MOBILE SYSTELIVERMORE 07/02/2003 17775.00000 37-43-03.7 N WY NE 109-09-32.5 W 0001371411 WWC HOLDING CO., INC. CEDAR PK 07/02/2003 10553.75000 44-29-45.8 N NY
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-236629A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-236629A1.txt
    • Company Orange 07/11/2003 19620.00000 33-47-15.5 N MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City WA AM WBH474 117-04-54.7 W 0001273834 WASHINGTON, STATE OF SPOKANE 07/07/2003 06152.75000 47-34-30.6 N NY AM 074-01-40.5 W 0001335136 NEW YORK STATE THRUWAY AUTHORKINGSTON 07/09/2003 00932.61250 41-56-44.4 N CA MD WPWY503 118-27-01.3 W 0001377255 CITY OF LOS ANGELES WEST LOS ANGEL 07/09/2003 10735.00000 34-02-39.0 N CA MD WPWY503 118-27-01.3 W 0001377255 CITY OF LOS ANGELES WEST LOS ANGEL 07/09/2003 10835.00000 34-02-39.0 N PA MD WPXJ719 076-14-16.0 W 0001377662 Lancaster, County of Truce 07/10/2003 10622.50000 39-53-31.7 N CA MD WNEG203 116-09-28.0 W 0001378127 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT COACHELLA 07/10/2003 00953.55000 33-40-15.1 N CA MD
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-236852A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-236852A1.txt
    • OLANCHA 07/15/2003 06063.80000 36-11-34.7 N CA MD KMQ73 118-00-31.2 W 0001383338 Verizon California Inc. OLANCHA 07/15/2003 06093.45000 36-11-34.7 N AL MD WML236 086-40-36.7 W 0001383509 ALLTEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. JEMISON 07/15/2003 02115.20000 32-58-02.7 N AL MD WML236 086-40-36.7 W 0001383509 ALLTEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. JEMISON 07/15/2003 06197.24000 32-58-02.7 N AL MD WLU643 086-30-15.9 W 0001383511 ALLTEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. White City 07/15/2003 02168.40000 32-38-01.3 N AL MD WLU643 086-30-15.9 W 0001383511 ALLTEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. White City 07/15/2003 05945.20000 32-38-01.3 N AL MD WLU643 086-30-15.9 W 0001383511 ALLTEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. White City 07/15/2003 06063.80000 32-38-01.3 N AL MD WLU640 086-17-11.0 W 0001383516 ALLTEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. MONTGOMERY 07/15/2003 06256.54000 32-22-28.0 N AL MD WLU640 086-17-11.0 W 0001383516 ALLTEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. MONTGOMERY 07/15/2003 06315.84000 32-22-28.0 N AL
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-237173A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-237173A1.txt
    • Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MA NE P 071-02-29.0 W 0001394227 AVON WATER DEPARTMENT AVON 07/22/2003 00956.25625 42-07-50.0 N MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NJ AM WNEL597 074-43-01.5 W 0001309504 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF BORDENTOWN 07/24/2003 06315.84000 40-08-01.3 N NJ AM WNEL597 074-43-01.5 W 0001309504 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF BORDENTOWN 07/24/2003 06615.00000 40-08-01.3 N NJ AM WNEL597 074-43-01.5 W 0001309504 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF BORDENTOWN 07/24/2003 06645.00000 40-08-01.3 N NJ AM WNEL597 074-43-01.5 W 0001309504 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF BORDENTOWN 07/24/2003 06685.00000 40-08-01.3 N NJ AM WNEL597 074-43-01.5 W 0001309504 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF BORDENTOWN 07/24/2003 06695.00000 40-08-01.3
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-237354A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-237354A1.txt
    • 097-01-32.1 W 0001400052 JOHNSON ENTERPRISES, INC Winfield 07/30/2003 00949.37500 37-14-11.1 N NY NE 074-15-50.5 W 0001402616 RIP RADIO, LLC Windham 07/31/2003 00944.50000 42-17-06.3 N AS - Aural Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NY AM WMU494 073-59-30.5 W 0001275527 WPLJ-FM RADIO INC NEW YORK 07/28/2003 00950.50000 40-45-01.3 N NY AM KVK74 073-59-09.0 W 0001275622 WABC-AM RADIO, INC. NEW YORK CITY 07/28/2003 00948.00000 40-44-54.0 N NY AM KVK74 073-59-09.0 W 0001275622 WABC-AM RADIO, INC. NEW YORK CITY 07/28/2003 00948.00000 40-44-54.0 N MT AM 111-20-04.8 W 0001277008 FISHER RADIO REGIONAL GROUP INC.Great Falls 07/31/2003 00949.00000 47-30-27.5 N MT AM 111-20-04.8 W 0001277008 FISHER RADIO REGIONAL GROUP INC.Great Falls 07/31/2003
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-237593A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-237593A1.txt
    • Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TX AM 102-38-36.5 W 0001299839 CRANE, CITY OF CRANE 08/06/2003 00932.45625 31-27-59.5 N TX AM 102-38-36.5 W 0001299839 CRANE, CITY OF CRANE 08/06/2003 00941.45625 31-27-59.5 N NJ AM WNEL597 074-43-01.5 W 0001309504 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF BORDENTOWN 08/04/2003 06315.84000 40-08-01.3 N NJ AM WNEL597 074-43-01.5 W 0001309504 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF BORDENTOWN 08/04/2003 06555.00000 40-08-01.3 N NJ AM WNEL597 074-43-01.5 W 0001309504 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF BORDENTOWN 08/04/2003 06585.00000 40-08-01.3 N NJ AM WNEL597 074-43-01.5 W 0001309504 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF BORDENTOWN 08/04/2003 06590.62500 40-08-01.3 N NJ AM WNEL597 074-43-01.5 W 0001309504 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF BORDENTOWN 08/04/2003 06615.00000 40-08-01.3
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238477A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238477A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238477A1.txt
    • Name: ENTRAVISION HOLDINGS, LLC Requested Facility: Ch No:19 N Latitude: 27-30-4; W Longitude: 99-30-37 ERP (Average): 7 kW; HAAT: 43.86 meters; Antenna: DA Facility ID: 2942 Call Sign: WPGX-DT File No: BDSTA-20030507ACP City: PANAMA CITY State: FL Grant Date: 05/21/2003 Licensee Name: WAITT LICENSE CO. OF FLORIDA, INC. Requested Facility: Ch No:9 N Latitude: 30-23-42; W Longitude: 85-32-2 ERP (Average): 1.3 kW; HAAT: 95 meters; Antenna: DA Facility ID: 72062 Call Sign: WFMJ-DT File No: BDSTA-20030507ACR City: YOUNGSTOWN State: OH Grant Date: 05/23/2003 Licensee Name: WFMJ TELEVISION, INC. Requested Facility: Ch No:20 N Latitude: 41-4-48; W Longitude: 80-38-25 ERP (Average): 200 kW; HAAT: 235 meters; Antenna: ND Facility ID: 56526 Call Sign: WTTK-DT File No: BDSTA-20030508ADC City: KOKOMO State: IN Grant
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-239131A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-239131A1.txt
    • Partnership Los Angeles 09/18/2003 10568.12500 34-02-50.0 N OK NE 097-52-48.0 W 0001455136 Black Crow Wireless, LP WAUKOMIS 09/18/2003 06805.00000 36-16-42.0 N OK NE 097-34-06.0 W 0001455137 Black Crow Wireless, LP Garber 09/18/2003 06605.00000 36-24-07.0 N OK NE 097-34-06.0 W 0001455137 Black Crow Wireless, LP Garber 09/18/2003 06645.00000 36-24-07.0 N NY NE 073-59-26.4 W 0001455152 AT&T CORP. NEW YORK 09/18/2003 21975.00000 40-46-01.3 N NY NE 073-58-30.7 W 0001455153 AT&T CORP. NEW YORK 09/18/2003 23175.00000 40-45-44.3 N Page 14 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA NE 117-42-50.5 W 0001455332 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership Chino Hills 09/18/2003 19605.00000 33-59-11.4 N WY NE
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-239660A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-239660A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-239660A2.txt
    • reach their earliest customers. Subsequently, the structural separation rules in cable were relaxed. Incumbent telco Korea Telecom sold its cable infrastructure to cable service providers in 2000. Hanaro, in addition to leasing cable capacity, also provides DSL services over its own facilities-based network. In 2002, 48% of Hanaro's revenues were from cable modems (1.5 million subscribers) and 44% from DSL (1.3 million subscribers). Thrunet, sold parts of the company in recent years and filed for bankruptcy in 2003. Korea Telecom, the telecom incumbent, entered the broadband services market in 2000, in response to the challenge presented by companies like Hanaro, which had by then signed up more than a million customers. KT rapidly increased subscribership, reaching 2 million in 2001 and
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-239685A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-239685A1.txt
    • SCHOOL DUNDAS, IL CG IF-20030930AAD RENEWAL WLX991 (22480) FREDERICKSBURG INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT INGRAM, TX GG IF-20030930AAE RENEWAL WLX976 (58469) SABINAL SCHOOL DISTRICT SABINAL, TX AG IF-20030930AAF RENEWAL WLX505 (72040) WETUMKA PUBLIC SCHOOLS I-005 HOLDENVILLE, OK DG MDS APPLICATIONS ACCEPTED MD-20030922AAC NEW NEW (310111) GRAND WIRELESS COMPANY FARWELL, MI NEW MDS STATION LAT N 43 50 04.9/ LONG W 84 52 01.3 MD-20030922AAD NEW NEW (310112) GRAND WIRELESS COMPANY CLARE, MI E1 F1 F2 NEW MDS STATION LAT N 43 49 09/ LONG W 84 46 14.6 MD-20030922AAE NEW NEW (310113) GRAND WIRELESS COMPANY ALMA, MI F1 F2 NEW MDS STATION LAT N 43 22 54.1/ LONG 84 37 36.2 Page 5 MD-20030922AAF NEW NEW (310114) GRAND WIRELESS COMPANY MOUNT PLEASANT, MI
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-240461A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-240461A1.txt
    • COUNTY OF ISSAQUAH 10/21/2003 06840.00000 47-30-19.4 N Page 29 MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City WA MD WPUS839 122-17-29.4 W 0001489533 KING, COUNTY OF FEDERAL WAY 10/21/2003 06680.00000 47-16-40.4 N NJ MD WNER477 074-43-01.5 W 0001490926 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF BORDENTOWN 10/22/2003 06635.00000 40-08-01.3 N NJ MD WNER481 074-36-46.5 W 0001491034 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF PLAINSBORO 10/22/2003 06765.00000 74-36-46.6 N NJ MD WNER481 074-36-46.5 W 0001491034 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF PLAINSBORO 10/22/2003 06825.00000 74-36-46.6 N CA MD WPXT495 115-33-51.6 W 0001492172 San Diego, County of El Centro 10/22/2003 06635.00000 32-44-54.8 N WA MD WNER394 124-10-39.7 W 0001492396 WASHINGTON, STATE OF KALALOCH 10/23/2003 05945.20000 47-44-57.3
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-240462A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-240462A1.txt
    • status of all versions of a particular filing. E C Parent Station License Cancelled Terminated Parent Station License Expired M N Parent Station License Modified Parent Station License Renewed T W Q Withdrawn Accepted Page 22 CORRECTION(S): Grand Wireless Company Location: Farwell, MI Facility: 310111 20030922AAC NEW Purpose Comment: New MDS Station, Lat N 43 50 04.9/ Long 84 52 01.3 Callsign: New Freq channel: F3 Page 23 THE FOLLOWING LICENSES HAVE BEEN TERMINATED AS A RESULT OF PRIVATE LAND MOBILE AUDIT LETTER RESPONSES. Callsign Reference Num Licensee Terminate DateStatus WPAM550 70216EIDE, GILMAN 10/21/2003 T WPGS204 70378EL CENTRO SCHOOL DISTRICT 10/21/2003 T KNBJ620 71994EMERSON HOSPITAL 10/21/2003 T WPDZ681 72498ENGLEHARD CORPORATION 10/21/2003 T KNCQ795 72733ENTERPRISE RENT A CAR CO OF LOS ANGELES
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-240774A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-240774A1.txt
    • RICHLAND, INC. WYMER 10/31/2003 06655.00000 46-50-59.4 N WA MD WLS669 120-34-35.2 W 0001502020 USCOC OF RICHLAND, INC. WYMER 10/31/2003 10617.50000 46-50-59.4 N CA MD WLM961 117-36-28.2 W 0001502184 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNEEL TORO 10/31/2003 10663.75000 33-39-56.1 N CA NE 123-08-34.0 W 0001495070 Cellco Partnership Hopland 10/27/2003 06605.00000 38-55-53.6 N CA NE 123-14-00.2 W 0001495255 Cellco Partnership UKIAH 10/27/2003 06765.00000 39-07-01.3 N CA NE 120-16-41.6 W 0001495841 SOUTHWESTERN BELL MOBILE SYSTELE GRAND 10/27/2003 10551.25000 37-16-20.2 N CA NE 120-21-11.4 W 0001496077 SOUTHWESTERN BELL MOBILE SYSTECHOWCHILLA 10/27/2003 19565.00000 37-01-56.7 N WA NE 122-11-38.4 W 0001496508 VOICESTREAM PCS III LICENSE CORPAuburn 10/27/2003 19475.00000 47-20-13.4 N WA NE 122-13-53.4 W 0001496530 VOICESTREAM PCS III LICENSE CORPAuburn 10/27/2003 17915.00000 47-18-10.4 N CA NE 121-38-56.6 W
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-241673A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-241673A1.txt
    • 095-30-08.7 W 0001520643 Verizon Wireless Texas, LLC HOUSTON 11/19/2003 06315.84000 29-57-07.8 N TX MD WHQ778 095-30-08.7 W 0001520643 Verizon Wireless Texas, LLC HOUSTON 11/19/2003 06345.49000 29-57-07.8 N TX MD WHQ778 095-30-08.7 W 0001520643 Verizon Wireless Texas, LLC HOUSTON 11/19/2003 06375.14000 29-57-07.8 N TX MD WHQ778 095-30-08.7 W 0001520643 Verizon Wireless Texas, LLC HOUSTON 11/19/2003 06404.79000 29-57-07.8 N NV MD WPJD342 115-51-01.3 W 0001521161 WWC License L.L.C. ELKO 11/19/2003 02171.60000 40-55-18.7 N NV MD WPJD342 115-51-01.3 W 0001521161 WWC License L.L.C. ELKO 11/19/2003 06125.57000 40-55-18.7 N NV MD WPJD342 115-51-01.3 W 0001521161 WWC License L.L.C. ELKO 11/19/2003 06226.89000 40-55-18.7 N NV MD WPJD342 115-51-01.3 W 0001521161 WWC License L.L.C. ELKO 11/19/2003 06315.84000 40-55-18.7 N NV MD WMN560 115-37-49.0 W 0001521162 WWC License
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-241826A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-241826A1.txt
    • 11/24/2003 00956.41875 40-08-43.4 N CO NE P 105-03-03.6 W 0001524232 Cucharas San & Water Cuchara 11/24/2003 00956.35625 37-27-49.0 N PA NE P 074-50-12.8 W 0001524235 Lower Bucks County Joint Municipal AuthoLevittown 11/24/2003 00956.33125 40-08-49.6 N VA NE P 076-35-59.3 W 0001524237 City of Suffolk Suffolk 11/24/2003 00956.41875 36-43-59.2 N IN NE P 085-10-35.8 W 0001524238 Bluffton Utilities Bluffton 11/24/2003 00956.34375 40-44-01.3 N MT NE P 111-03-00.0 W 0001524240 Big Sky Co Water & Sewer Dist 363 Big Sky 11/24/2003 00956.36875 45-40-48.0 N LA NE P 093-27-15.8 W 0001524244 Town of Cotton Valley Cotton Valley 11/24/2003 00956.39375 32-50-17.5 N TN NE 083-56-40.6 W 0001524634 KNOXILLE UTILITIES BOARD KNOXVILLE 11/24/2003 00928.44375 36-00-07.2 N TN NE 083-56-40.6 W 0001524634 KNOXILLE UTILITIES BOARD KNOXVILLE 11/24/2003
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-242307A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-242307A1.pdf
    • touches upon my core responsibility as a public broadcaster. I'm sure that most of you here have tuned in to public radio at some point. North Carolina has 15 different public radio licensees offering news, public affairs, classical music, jazz, bluegrass, hip-hop, reggae, community service announcements, and reading services to the blind. And we have a combined weekly audience of 1.3 million listeners across the state, so it's a significant audience that is reached in North Carolina. One of the licensees is WUNC public radio. We're a news and public affairs service, with bluegrass music on the weekends, licensed to the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. We serve 300,000 weekly listeners in 36 counties in North Carolina. We don't
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-242591A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-242591A1.txt
    • AM 088-31-53.4 W 0001500583 Trent Lott International Airport Moss Point 12/23/2003 30-27-44.3 N IL MD WIL8 089-00-18.4 W 0001553751 OSF SAINT ANTHONY MEDICAL CENTER ROCKFORD 12/22/2003 00123.07500 42-16-12.1 N LA MD KQM6 090-17-23.2 W 0001553787 AERONAUTICAL RADIO INC Galliano 12/22/2003 00129.85000 29-54-53.7 N LA MD KQM6 090-17-23.2 W 0001553787 AERONAUTICAL RADIO INC Galliano 12/22/2003 00131.05000 29-54-53.7 N GM MD KTH8 090-43-01.3 W 0001555270 AERONAUTICAL RADIO INC OFFSHORE 12/23/2003 00128.95000 28-09-08.9 N FL NE 081-26-13.5 W 0001555297 Aeronautical Radio Inc Orlando 12/23/2003 00129.95000 28-17-23.3 N Page 1 AF - Aeronautical and Fixed State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City AS NE 170-42-37.9 W 0001555312 Aeronautical Radio Inc Pago Pago 12/23/2003 00129.90000 14-19-51.7
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243428A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243428A1.txt
    • (26A) FEE DUE FOR (PTC) (28A) FCC CODE 1 (27A) TOTAL FEE FCC USE ONLY $2,865.00 $2,865.00 (29A) FCC CODE 2 (23B) CALL SIGN/OTHER ID (24B) PAYMENT TYPE CODE (25B) QUANTITY EchoStar 123.5 W.L. MXD 1 (26B) FEE DUE FOR (PTC) $27,780.00 (27B) TOTAL FEE FCC USE ONLY (28B) FCC CODE 1 I SECTION D - CERTIFICATION (30) CERTJFICATION STATEMENT 1.3 ~.rl k, F(ostly;tt the best of my knowledge, information and belief. , certify u SIGNATURE (29B) FCC CODE 2 SECTION E - CREDIT CARD PAYMENT INFORMATION EXPIRATION rn DATE: MASTERCARDNISA ACCOUNT NUMBER (31) 0 MASTERCARD VISA I hereby authorize the FCC to charge my VISA or MASTERCARD for the service(s)/authonzation herein described. SIGNATURE DATE SEE PUBLIC BURDEN ON REVERSE FCC
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243942A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243942A1.txt
    • 91 OWL and Nimiq 2 at 82"WL, and has been authorized by Industry Canada 10 operate a third BSS satelJite in the 72.5"WL position. The Yimiq satellites and associated ground segment operalions have been designed to operate in full conformity with the Region 2 Plan and current orbital spacing assignments. ai a cost reaching inlo the billions ofdollars. More than 1.3 million Canadians locared in all regions of thc country currently subscribe to Direcl-to-Home ("DTH") seneices provided over these BSS satellites. It would be -I- patently unacceptable and unfair for any Administration lo unilaterally implement changes which might jeopardize this enonnous financial investment or degrade or curtail services to Canadian DTH service users. Based on these twin needs of requiring all
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243985A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243985A1.txt
    • NJ AM WNEV772 074-32-07.0 W 0001609843 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF RANDOLPH TOWN 02/13/2004 06775.00000 40-49-51.0 N NJ AM WNEV772 074-32-07.0 W 0001609843 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF RANDOLPH TOWN 02/13/2004 06805.00000 40-49-51.0 N NJ AM WNEL598 074-55-56.5 W 0001609844 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF BERLIN 02/13/2004 06745.00000 39-48-14.4 N NJ AM WNEL597 074-43-01.5 W 0001609845 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF BORDENTOWN 02/13/2004 06585.00000 40-08-01.3 N NJ MD WNEV773 074-54-14.0 W 0001609839 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF CHERRYVILLE 02/09/2004 06555.00000 40-33-16.0 N NJ MD WNEV773 074-54-14.0 W 0001609839 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF CHERRYVILLE 02/09/2004 06585.00000 40-33-16.0 N NJ MD WNEV773 074-54-14.0 W 0001609839 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF CHERRYVILLE 02/09/2004 06585.00000 40-33-16.0 N NJ MD WNEV773 074-54-14.0 W 0001609839 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF CHERRYVILLE 02/09/2004 06615.00000 40-33-16.0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-244430A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-244430A1.pdf
    • Television and Radio Services Approximately 20 million American households receive MVPD services through direct broadcast satellite (DBS). DBS generally carries the same nationwide channels as cable, and also provides carriage of local stations in major metropolitan areas (referred to as local-into-local service). Currently, DirecTV and EchoStar retransmit local stations in 45 of the top 50 television markets In addition, another 1.3 million Americans receive satellite radio service in their cars, homes, boats and recreational vehicles. Satellite radio carries approximately 100 channels of digital audio with music, sports, and information. During a time of national crisis, it may also be the primary means of communicating to its subscribers. State of the National Satellite Television and Radio Industries Highlights of findings in the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-244679A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-244679A1.txt
    • (26A) FEE DUE FOR (PTC) (28A) FCC CODE 1 (27A) TOTAL FEE FCC USE ONLY $2,865.00 $2,865.00 (29A) FCC CODE 2 (23B) CALL SIGN/OTHER ID (24B) PAYMENT TYPE CODE (25B) QUANTITY EchoStar 123.5 W.L. MXD 1 (26B) FEE DUE FOR (PTC) $27,780.00 (27B) TOTAL FEE FCC USE ONLY (28B) FCC CODE 1 I SECTION D - CERTIFICATION (30) CERTJFICATION STATEMENT 1.3 ~.rl k, F(ostly;tt the best of my knowledge, information and belief. , certify u SIGNATURE (29B) FCC CODE 2 SECTION E - CREDIT CARD PAYMENT INFORMATION EXPIRATION rn DATE: MASTERCARDNISA ACCOUNT NUMBER (31) 0 MASTERCARD VISA I hereby authorize the FCC to charge my VISA or MASTERCARD for the service(s)/authonzation herein described. SIGNATURE DATE SEE PUBLIC BURDEN ON REVERSE FCC
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-245058A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-245058A1.txt
    • 25 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City FL NE 082-16-48.3 W 0001648538 Trillion Digital Communications DADE 03/09/2004 11405.00000 28-21-06.2 N FL NE 082-16-48.3 W 0001648538 Trillion Digital Communications DADE 03/09/2004 17900.00000 28-21-06.2 N FL NE 082-38-48.2 W 0001648540 Trillion Digital Communications HUDSON 03/09/2004 11215.00000 28-22-01.3 N FL NE 082-28-38.5 W 0001648541 Trillion Digital Communications LAND O' LAKES 03/09/2004 10715.00000 28-15-35.0 N FL NE 082-28-38.5 W 0001648541 Trillion Digital Communications LAND O' LAKES 03/09/2004 10795.00000 28-15-35.0 N FL NE 082-28-38.5 W 0001648541 Trillion Digital Communications LAND O' LAKES 03/09/2004 10915.00000 28-15-35.0 N FL NE 082-28-38.5 W 0001648541 Trillion Digital Communications LAND O' LAKES 03/09/2004 17820.00000 28-15-35.0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-245856A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-245856A1.txt
    • Aeronautical and Fixed State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City GM MD WSC5 089-14-54.2 W 0001675597 AERONAUTICAL RADIO INC OFFSHORE 03/29/2004 00129.37500 28-54-26.8 N FL NE 086-59-35.3 W 0001674824 SANTA ROSA COUNTY FLORIDA MILTON 03/12/2004 00123.07500 30-38-11.0 N TX NE 098-28-11.2 W 0001675959 Aeronautical Radio Inc San Antonio 03/29/2004 00131.25000 29-32-01.3 N TN NE 085-17-27.0 W 0001676637 Chattanooga Hamilton County Hospital AuChattanooga 03/29/2004 00123.05000 35-02-56.0 N AL NE 086-05-02.9 W 0001677096 City of Gadsden Gadsden 03/30/2004 00122.80000 33-58-03.4 N RO KRF4 0001673960 FITZGERALD, CITY OF 03/29/2004 Page 1 AF - Aeronautical and Fixed State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City RO
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-246534A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-246534A1.txt
    • COMPANYSKAPOOSE 04/21/2004 06165.10000 45-41-51.4 N OR MD WAM32 122-54-35.3 W 0001705635 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANYSKAPOOSE 04/21/2004 06855.00000 45-41-51.4 N Page 37 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OR MD WAM32 122-54-35.3 W 0001705635 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANYSKAPOOSE 04/21/2004 06865.00000 45-41-51.4 N OR MD WAM33 122-41-01.3 W 0001705636 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANYPORTLAND 04/21/2004 06417.14000 45-32-31.4 N OR MD WAM33 122-41-01.3 W 0001705636 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANYPORTLAND 04/21/2004 06665.00000 45-32-31.4 N OR MD WAM33 122-41-01.3 W 0001705636 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANYPORTLAND 04/21/2004 06705.00000 45-32-31.4 N OR MD WAM33 122-41-01.3 W 0001705636 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANYPORTLAND 04/21/2004 19360.00000 45-32-31.4 N GM MD WEF707 092-37-42.4 W 0001709059 Chevron USA
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-246891A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-246891A1.txt
    • 04/28/2004 06765.00000 43-07-14.9 N WY NE 109-26-13.0 W 0001715671 UNION TELEPHONE COMPANY INC GREEN RIVER 04/28/2004 10626.25000 41-30-42.1 N AK NE 148-28-13.0 W 0001715727 Arctic Slope Telephone Association CoopeDeadhorse 04/28/2004 19560.00000 70-11-59.0 N AK NE 148-24-02.0 W 0001715788 Arctic Slope Telephone Association CoopeDeadhorse 04/28/2004 18000.00000 70-13-37.0 N CA NE 117-31-48.9 W 0001717456 Nextel of California, Inc Rancho Cucamonga 04/29/2004 11365.00000 34-06-01.3 N NH NE 071-10-55.0 W 0001717541 NH #1 RURAL CELLULAR, INC. BERLIN 04/29/2004 10618.12500 44-30-21.0 N NH NE 071-12-47.1 W 0001717601 NH #1 RURAL CELLULAR, INC. Gorham 04/29/2004 10553.12500 44-22-15.8 N CA NE 117-30-02.1 W 0001717704 Nextel of California, Inc Fontana 04/29/2004 10875.00000 34-05-19.0 N PR NE 066-24-07.6 W 0001718303 SAN JUAN CELLULAR TELEPHONE COSANTA ISABEL 04/29/2004 10587.50000 17-57-13.3 N
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-247089A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-247089A1.txt
    • WMM933 121-15-06.8 W 0001727840 AT&T Wireless Services of Florida, Inc. LODI 05/07/2004 10622.50000 38-08-29.7 N CA MD WMM934 121-04-51.7 W 0001727852 AT&T Wireless Services of Florida, Inc. FARMINGTON 05/07/2004 10557.50000 38-10-58.7 N CA MD WMT849 121-08-45.7 W 0001727863 AT&T Wireless Services of Florida, Inc. GLENNWOOD 05/07/2004 10557.50000 37-58-42.7 N MA MD WLW636 070-53-00.1 W 0001728585 CELLCO PARTNERSHIP ACUSHNET 05/07/2004 10551.25000 41-42-01.3 N Page 2 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City SD MD KNKN429 099-21-25.5 W 0001727529 WWC License L.L.C. Burke 05/06/2004 43-12-28.8 N SD MD KNKN429 098-54-00.6 W 0001727529 WWC License L.L.C. Fairfax 05/06/2004 43-02-16.7 N SD MD KNKN429 101-56-15.8 W 0001727529 WWC License L.L.C. Interior 05/06/2004
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-247090A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-247090A1.txt
    • MA MD WLV796 071-18-43.1 W 0001728651 Cellco Partnership ATTLEBORO 05/07/2004 10915.00000 41-55-47.3 N WI MD WPNB595 091-14-21.5 W 0001728681 LACROSSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. HOLMEN 05/07/2004 06805.00000 43-56-36.8 N VI NE 064-52-40.7 W 0001721130 CCPR OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS, INC,ST. THOMAS 05/03/2004 10637.50000 18-18-28.8 N AZ NE 111-18-49.4 W 0001721182 CNG COMMUNICATIONS, INC. PAYSON 05/03/2004 17825.00000 33-52-15.1 N CA NE 118-15-01.3 W 0001721590 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP LANCASTER 05/03/2004 10581.25000 34-46-34.7 N AZ NE 111-37-45.6 W 0001721859 CNG COMMUNICATIONS, INC. FLAGSTAFF 05/03/2004 19360.00000 35-11-50.0 N PR NE 065-48-54.6 W 0001721915 SAN JUAN CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY HUMACAO 05/03/2004 10652.50000 18-05-20.2 N PR NE 066-52-02.0 W 0001722171 SAN JUAN CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY LARES 05/03/2004 06140.40000 18-18-20.6 N PR NE 066-42-45.2 W 0001722320
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-247368A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-247368A1.txt
    • 076-53-48.0 W 0001730928 Cellco Partnership WILLIAMSBURG 05/10/2004 06197.24000 37-16-06.0 N VA NE 076-53-48.0 W 0001730928 Cellco Partnership WILLIAMSBURG 05/10/2004 06226.89000 37-16-06.0 N VA NE 076-53-48.0 W 0001730928 Cellco Partnership WILLIAMSBURG 05/10/2004 06256.54000 37-16-06.0 N VA NE 076-53-48.0 W 0001730928 Cellco Partnership WILLIAMSBURG 05/10/2004 06286.19000 37-16-06.0 N VA NE 076-53-48.0 W 0001730928 Cellco Partnership WILLIAMSBURG 05/10/2004 06315.84000 37-16-06.0 N PR NE 066-08-01.3 W 0001730937 SprintCom, Inc. (Puerto Rico) San Juan 05/10/2004 17925.00000 18-23-50.3 N CA NE 122-20-28.8 W 0001731135 PACIFIC BELL BURLINGAME 05/10/2004 10855.00000 37-27-20.9 N CA NE 122-20-28.8 W 0001731135 PACIFIC BELL BURLINGAME 05/10/2004 11015.00000 37-27-20.9 N CA NE 122-21-00.5 W 0001731136 PACIFIC BELL BURLINGAME 05/10/2004 11505.00000 37-34-36.3 N CA NE 122-29-57.9 W 0001731137 PACIFIC BELL EL GRANADA 05/10/2004 11345.00000 37-29-53.7
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-247633A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-247633A1.txt
    • Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TN MD WAA911 086-47-38.8 W 0001743752 CAPSTAR TX LIMITED PARTNERSHIPNASHVILLE 05/20/2004 00950.50000 36-08-52.0 N AR MD WPVW275 094-25-02.8 W 0001743874 CAPSTAR TX LIMITED PARTNERSHIPFORT SMITH 05/20/2004 00944.50000 35-22-52.3 N WA MD WPOQ888 118-24-07.6 W 0001745436 ALEXANDRA COMMUNICATIONS, INC.WALLA WALLA 05/21/2004 00950.50000 46-04-01.1 N PA NE 076-14-01.3 W 0001738312 FBS WIRELESS CORPORATION BERWICK 05/17/2004 00950.00000 41-03-18.7 N GU NE 144-44-36.5 E 0001742073 MOY COMMUNICATIONS, INC. HAGATNA 05/19/2004 00948.50000 - 00949.00000 13-28-33.6 N GU NE 144-49-43.9 E 0001742107 MOY COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AGANA 05/19/2004 00947.00000 13-29-22.4 N GA NE 081-05-14.0 W 0001742448 THOROUGHBRED COMMUNICATIONS,Savannah 05/19/2004 00945.37500 - 00945.62500 32-02-29.0 N WA NE 122-55-39.4 W 0001743329 WASHINGTON INTERSTATE BROADCAKELSO 05/20/2004
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-247892A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-247892A1.txt
    • MD WPJA745 116-51-20.0 W 0001748371 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC CLEVELAND FORE 05/25/2004 06160.16000 33-18-25.1 N CA MD WMP212 116-58-14.1 W 0001748448 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC RAMONA 05/25/2004 06412.20000 33-00-32.2 N PR MD WPYI685 066-09-49.3 W 0001748679 SprintCom, Ins (Puerto Rico) Bayamon 05/25/2004 19485.00000 18-22-15.1 N HI MD WMW955 159-26-54.3 W 0001748895 AT&T Wireless Services of Hawaii, Inc. KOLOA 05/25/2004 06605.00000 21-54-01.3 N HI MD WLV479 159-31-26.4 W 0001748903 AT&T Wireless Services of Hawaii, Inc. KALAHEO 05/25/2004 02174.80000 21-54-58.5 N HI MD WLV479 159-31-26.4 W 0001748903 AT&T Wireless Services of Hawaii, Inc. KALAHEO 05/25/2004 06765.00000 21-54-58.5 N MT MD WPXR635 108-27-01.7 W 0001750722 WWC Holding Co., Inc. Billings 05/26/2004 06345.49000 45-45-34.9 N MT MD WPXR635 108-27-01.7 W 0001750722 WWC Holding Co., Inc.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.txt
    • 199412,430.9 1,122.7 440.9 122.7 12.4 25.3 13,144.314,154.8 80,726 17.5 199514,159.8 1,759.4 514.2 119.3 6.3 47.9 15,023.416,606.8 85,475 19.4 199614,234.1 3,642.7 660.7 118.9 5.0 26.1 15,409.118,687.5 93,361 20.0 199715,250.4 4,113.1 850.9 109.8 3.5 28.3 16,654.220,356.0 $89,193100,793 18.7%20.2 199814,246.4 4,798.3 921.5 50.5 2.7 36.3 15,737.220,055.7 91,607105,055 17.2 19.1 199914,527.6 4,528.0 1,215.9 56.8 1.6 30.8 16,285.520,360.8 93,311108,246 17.5 18.8 200014,172.2 7,366.7 1,501.9 32.7 1.3 250.6 16,751.423,381.4 87,767109,615 19.1 21.3 200110,844.4 5,341.8 1,467.0 10.3 0.3 199.2 13,392.318,200.0 79,302 99,301 16.9 18.3 2002 9,446.4 5,100.7 988.1 5/ 5/ 112.8 12,005.916,596.6 67,222 83,697 17.9 19.8 See notes at the end of the tables. Table 2 International Telephone Service Per-Minute Data 1/ (Revenues, Payouts, Receipts and Minutes Amounts Shown in Millions) U.S. Billed Amounts Foreign Billed Amounts Per-Minute
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249318A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249318A1.txt
    • CITY & COUNTY, DEPT OFKAAAWA 06/30/2004 05974.85000 21-33-24.5 N HI MD WNEU884 157-51-16.1 W 0001791689 HONOLULU, CITY & COUNTY, DEPT OFKAAAWA 06/30/2004 06004.50000 21-33-24.5 N HI MD WNEU884 157-51-16.1 W 0001791689 HONOLULU, CITY & COUNTY, DEPT OFKAAAWA 06/30/2004 06795.00000 21-33-24.5 N HI MD WNEU884 157-51-16.1 W 0001791689 HONOLULU, CITY & COUNTY, DEPT OFKAAAWA 06/30/2004 06845.00000 21-33-24.5 N HI MD WEE514 158-00-01.3 W 0001791698 HONOLULU, CITY & COUNTY, DEPT OFKAHUKU 06/30/2004 06034.15000 21-39-52.0 N HI MD WEE514 158-00-01.3 W 0001791698 HONOLULU, CITY & COUNTY, DEPT OFKAHUKU 06/30/2004 06063.80000 21-39-52.0 N HI MD WEE514 158-00-01.3 W 0001791698 HONOLULU, CITY & COUNTY, DEPT OFKAHUKU 06/30/2004 06775.00000 21-39-52.0 N HI MD WEE514 158-00-01.3 W 0001791698 HONOLULU, CITY & COUNTY, DEPT OFKAHUKU 06/30/2004 06815.00000 21-39-52.0 N
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249855A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249855A1.txt
    • Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA NE 118-15-05.4 W 0001804947 NextWeb Inc. Los Angeles 07/13/2004 17840.00000 33-58-38.3 N CA NE 118-21-47.4 W 0001804966 NextWeb Inc. Los Angeles 07/13/2004 19360.00000 34-00-18.5 N CA NE 118-21-47.4 W 0001804966 NextWeb Inc. Los Angeles 07/13/2004 19400.00000 34-00-18.5 N CA NE 118-15-05.4 W 0001804978 NextWeb Inc. Los Angeles 07/13/2004 17800.00000 34-03-01.3 N CA NE 117-44-49.8 W 0001804990 Nextweb Inc. Irvine 07/13/2004 19400.00000 33-39-13.8 N CA NE 117-48-16.6 W 0001805008 Nextweb Inc. Tustin 07/13/2004 17840.00000 33-43-05.8 N CA NE 117-48-16.6 W 0001805008 Nextweb Inc. Tustin 07/13/2004 17880.00000 33-43-05.8 N CA NE 121-49-13.8 W 0001805868 S M LEASING AND RENTAL LTD Yuba City 07/13/2004 00928.31875 39-12-19.6 N CA NE 121-49-13.8 W 0001805868 S
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-250521A4.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-250521A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-250521A4.txt
    • 0 obj<>stream endstream endobj 1244 0 obj<>stream endstream endobj 1245 0 obj<>stream endstream endobj 1246 0 obj<>stream endstream endobj 1247 0 obj<>stream H��‡ endstream endobj 1248 0 obj<>stream endstream endobj 1250 0 obj<> endobj 1251 0 obj<>stream xmlns:pdf='http://ns.adobe.com/pdf/1.3/' pdf:Company='FCC' pdf:Producer='Acrobat Distiller 6.0 (Windows)'> FCC Highlights Actions Promoting Homeland Security endstream endobj xref 0 1255 0000000831 65535 f 0000004388 00000 n 0000010672 00000 n 0000102586 00000
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-250835A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-250835A1.txt
    • 00932.66250 41-42-03.0 N MI NE 085-06-50.2 W 0001828048 Ionia Intermediate School Dist LAKE ODESSA 08/03/2004 19480.00000 42-45-24.0 N MI NE 085-05-40.6 W 0001828051 Ionia Intermediate School Dist IONIA 08/03/2004 17920.00000 42-56-57.4 N SC NE 080-00-29.3 W 0001828438 Town of Hartsville HARTSVILLE 08/03/2004 00928.60625 34-24-09.4 N SC NE 080-00-29.3 W 0001828438 Town of Hartsville HARTSVILLE 08/03/2004 00952.60625 34-24-09.4 N VA NE 076-48-01.3 W 0001829475 COUNTY OF YORK Williamsburg 08/04/2004 06345.49000 37-23-15.7 N VA NE 076-48-01.3 W 0001829475 COUNTY OF YORK Williamsburg 08/04/2004 11325.00000 37-23-15.7 N VA NE 076-42-31.0 W 0001829496 COUNTY OF YORK WILLIAMSBURG 08/04/2004 06093.45000 37-19-56.0 N VA NE 076-42-31.0 W 0001829496 COUNTY OF YORK WILLIAMSBURG 08/04/2004 06152.75000 37-19-56.0 N VA NE 076-29-51.5 W 0001829514 COUNTY OF YORK Yorktown 08/04/2004 06404.79000
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-251059A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-251059A1.txt
    • N NE NE 099-49-16.0 W 0001833962 Custer Public Power District BROKEN BOW 08/09/2004 00955.55000 41-23-14.0 N NE NE 099-49-16.0 W 0001833962 Custer Public Power District BROKEN BOW 08/09/2004 00957.55000 41-23-14.0 N TX NE 096-47-38.0 W 0001833967 BTR Partners L.P. DALLAS 08/09/2004 23085.00000 32-47-12.0 N NE NE 099-22-19.4 W 0001833976 Custer Public Power District SARGENT 08/09/2004 00955.15000 41-42-08.0 N NE NE 100-58-01.3 W 0001833985 Custer Public Power District Tryon 08/09/2004 00958.35000 41-33-44.3 N NE NE 101-02-22.8 W 0001833990 Custer Public Power District Mullen 08/09/2004 00959.15000 41-59-07.3 N NE NE 100-14-13.0 W 0001833999 Custer Public Power District Arnold 08/09/2004 00958.75000 41-20-08.0 N NE NE 100-14-13.0 W 0001833999 Custer Public Power District Arnold 08/09/2004 00959.15000 41-20-08.0 N Page 35 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-251260A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-251260A1.txt
    • Limited PartnershipWESTMORELAND 08/18/2004 36-31-14.0 N TN MD KNKN792 086-10-33.0 W 0001845219 Tennessee RSA No. 3 Limited PartnershipWESTMORELAND 08/18/2004 36-31-14.0 N FL MD KNKA225 080-11-18.4 W 0001845524 Florida Cellular Service, LLC Miami 08/18/2004 26-13-03.5 N FL MD KNKA225 080-17-18.0 W 0001845524 Florida Cellular Service, LLC Miami 08/18/2004 26-17-00.0 N FL MD KNKA225 080-12-33.0 W 0001845524 Florida Cellular Service, LLC MIAMI 08/18/2004 26-04-01.3 N CO MD KNKN408 106-16-37.4 W 0001846947 COMMNET CELLULAR LICENSE HOLDIWalden 08/19/2004 40-44-32.8 N SD MD KNKN333 098-28-51.7 W 0001848847 WWC License L.L.C. Aberdeen 08/20/2004 45-27-53.9 N GS - Private Carrier Paging, 929-930 MHz State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OH NE 084-31-45.0 W 0001847563 QR3 SECURITY INC. CINCINNATI
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-251886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-251886A1.txt
    • State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NM NE 107-00-34.5 W 0001861662 Nextel License Holdings 4, Inc. Cuba 09/03/2004 10628.75000 36-02-00.2 N AZ NE 110-50-53.2 W 0001861760 Simply Bits, LLC Tuscon 09/03/2004 17880.00000 32-19-44.0 N AZ NE 110-54-27.0 W 0001861768 Simply Bits, LLC Tuscon 09/03/2004 19440.00000 32-12-19.0 N OR NE 122-35-01.3 W 0001861882 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Vida 09/03/2004 10593.12500 44-07-30.5 N CA NE 117-47-57.9 W 0001861916 COX COMMUNICATIONS PCS, L.P. LANCASTER 09/03/2004 06796.25000 34-45-36.7 N OR NE 122-24-36.3 W 0001861926 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC FINN ROCK 09/03/2004 10658.12500 44-08-33.0 N CA NE 117-37-05.4 W 0001861931 COX COMMUNICATIONS PCS, L.P. RED MOUNTAIN 09/03/2004 06636.25000 35-19-26.8 N OK NE 095-57-10.8 W 0001861933
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-252662A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-252662A1.txt
    • TELEPHONE COBELLEVILLE 09/22/2004 38-31-03.2 N IL RM KNKA234 089-58-09.4 W 0001879523 CYBERTEL CELLULAR TELEPHONE COBELLEVILLE 09/22/2004 38-31-03.2 N IL RM KNKA234 089-54-21.4 W 0001879523 CYBERTEL CELLULAR TELEPHONE COBELLEVILLE 09/22/2004 38-33-20.2 N IL RM KNKA234 089-54-21.4 W 0001879523 CYBERTEL CELLULAR TELEPHONE COBELLEVILLE 09/22/2004 38-33-20.2 N IL RM KNKA234 089-54-21.4 W 0001879523 CYBERTEL CELLULAR TELEPHONE COBELLEVILLE 09/22/2004 38-33-20.2 N IL RM KNKA234 089-32-01.3 W 0001879523 CYBERTEL CELLULAR TELEPHONE COBREESE 09/22/2004 38-39-10.2 N IL RM KNKA234 089-20-29.3 W 0001879523 CYBERTEL CELLULAR TELEPHONE COCARLYLE 09/22/2004 38-36-36.2 N MO RM KNKA234 090-39-53.5 W 0001879523 CYBERTEL CELLULAR TELEPHONE COCEDAR HILL 09/22/2004 38-21-02.2 N MO RM KNKA234 090-46-14.5 W 0001879523 CYBERTEL CELLULAR TELEPHONE CODardenne 09/22/2004 38-46-31.2 N Page 30 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-253072A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-253072A1.txt
    • Debtor-in-PHARDIN 10/05/2004 01875.00000 45-49-50.9 N Page 15 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MT AM WAW887 107-50-34.3 W 0001745208 NorthWestern Corporation, as Debtor-in-PHARDIN 10/05/2004 01885.00000 45-49-50.9 N MT AM WAW887 107-50-34.3 W 0001745208 NorthWestern Corporation, as Debtor-in-PHARDIN 10/05/2004 06543.75000 45-49-50.9 N MT AM WAT665 107-36-01.3 W 0001745209 NorthWestern Corporation, as Debtor-in-PHARDIN 10/05/2004 02145.20000 45-46-00.9 N MT AM WAT665 107-36-01.3 W 0001745209 NorthWestern Corporation, as Debtor-in-PHARDIN 10/05/2004 06713.75000 45-46-00.9 N MT AM KPB34 114-00-50.4 W 0001745210 NorthWestern Corporation, as Debtor-in-PMISSOULA 10/05/2004 06745.00000 47-01-05.7 N MT AM KPB34 114-00-50.4 W 0001745210 NorthWestern Corporation, as Debtor-in-PMISSOULA 10/05/2004 06785.00000 47-01-05.7 N MT AM KPB34 114-00-50.4 W 0001745210 NorthWestern Corporation,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-253344A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-253344A1.txt
    • Corporation, as Debtor-in-PMISSOULA 10/13/2004 06785.00000 47-01-05.7 N MT AM KPB34 114-00-50.4 W 0001745210 NorthWestern Corporation, as Debtor-in-PMISSOULA 10/13/2004 06791.25000 47-01-05.7 N MT AM KPB34 114-00-50.4 W 0001745210 NorthWestern Corporation, as Debtor-in-PMISSOULA 10/13/2004 06871.25000 47-01-05.7 N MT AM KPB34 114-00-50.4 W 0001745210 NorthWestern Corporation, as Debtor-in-PMISSOULA 10/13/2004 10563.12500 47-01-05.7 N CA AM 118-15-05.4 W 0001804978 NextWeb Inc. Los Angeles 10/13/2004 17760.00000 34-03-01.3 N CA AM 118-15-05.4 W 0001804978 NextWeb Inc. Los Angeles 10/13/2004 17800.00000 34-03-01.3 N CA AM 117-44-49.8 W 0001804990 Nextweb Inc. Irvine 10/13/2004 19400.00000 33-39-13.8 N CA AM 117-48-16.6 W 0001805008 Nextweb Inc. Tustin 10/13/2004 17840.00000 33-43-05.8 N CA AM 117-48-16.6 W 0001805008 Nextweb Inc. Tustin 10/13/2004 17880.00000 33-43-05.8 N CA AM 117-48-16.6 W 0001805008 Nextweb Inc. Tustin 10/13/2004 19640.00000
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-253492A4.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-253492A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-253492A4.txt
    • it happen. And choosing to ignore the Commission's own data does not help the weak analytical structure on which this decision is built. The facts are clear. This Commission's most recent report on high-speed services shows that the residential and small business market is a duopoly. Our data show that new satellite and wireless technologies-exciting though they are-together serve only 1.3 percent of this market. Broadband over powerline does not yet even register. Yet the majority chooses to ignore the Commission's statistics, preferring instead sweeping rhetoric about regulatory relief and broadband competition. One problem here is that the majority gets so carried away with its vision of the country's telecom future that they act like it is already here, that competition
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-253926A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-253926A1.txt
    • For further information about this Public Notice contact the Media Bureau at (202) 418-7000 CAR-20041101AB-01 OTIS CO NEW License for a New Station JAMES CABLE, LLC OTIS CO 40-08-50.0N 102-56-48.0W REQUEST WAIVER OF SECTION 78.18 OF FCC RULES Channels: C01-C03, C04*-C09*, C11-C42, D33*, E01-E03, E04*-E09*, E11-E25, E32-E41 CAR-20041102AA-01 SULLIGENT AL NEW License for a New Station JAMES CABLE, LLC T-L: 1.3 miles SE of Sulligent SULLIGENT AL 33-53-30.0N 088-06-21.0W REQUEST WAIVER OF SECTION 78.18 OF FCC RULES Channels: C01-CO3, C04*-C09*, C11-C42, D33*, E01-E03, E04*-E09*, E11-E25, E29-E41 CAR-20041102AB-10 NEAR RENO NV WAP-961 Renewal of License FALCON CABLE SYSTEMS COMPANY II, LP (2) For further information about this Public Notice contact the Media Bureau at (202) 418-7000
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254149A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254149A1.txt
    • 06660.00000 41-27-00.0 N CA NE 121-39-37.5 W 0001919511 Sprint Spectrum L.P. LIVERMORE 11/01/2004 17745.00000 37-43-03.2 N CA NE 117-54-47.0 W 0001920192 SOUTHWESTERN BELL MOBILE SYSTELITTLE LAKE 11/01/2004 06197.24000 35-55-33.2 N CA NE 117-54-47.0 W 0001920192 SOUTHWESTERN BELL MOBILE SYSTELITTLE LAKE 11/01/2004 10552.50000 35-55-33.2 N CA NE 118-04-09.3 W 0001920253 SOUTHWESTERN BELL MOBILE SYSTELITTLE LAKE 11/01/2004 05945.20000 36-27-55.1 N CA NE 118-00-01.3 W 0001920269 SOUTHWESTERN BELL MOBILE SYSTELITTLE LAKE 11/01/2004 10617.50000 36-12-34.0 N NH NE 071-24-16.6 W 0001920983 New Hampshire RSA 2 Partnership Hooksett 11/02/2004 06197.24000 43-01-19.0 N NH NE 071-24-16.6 W 0001920983 New Hampshire RSA 2 Partnership Hooksett 11/02/2004 06226.89000 43-01-19.0 N NH NE 071-24-16.6 W 0001920983 New Hampshire RSA 2 Partnership Hooksett 11/02/2004 06226.89000 43-01-19.0 N NH NE 071-24-16.6 W
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254883A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254883A1.txt
    • 077-29-53.9 W 0001949441 JOHN L. CRUMP DBA: ACE COMMUNICFREDERICK 11/24/2004 00454.07500 39-29-39.3 N VA MD KNLQ630 077-33-43.9 W 0001949441 JOHN L. CRUMP DBA: ACE COMMUNICFREDERICKSBURG 11/24/2004 00454.07500 38-11-48.4 N VA MD KNLQ630 077-21-16.9 W 0001949441 JOHN L. CRUMP DBA: ACE COMMUNICRESTON 11/24/2004 00454.07500 38-56-59.3 N MD MD KNLQ630 076-58-23.9 W 0001949441 JOHN L. CRUMP DBA: ACE COMMUNICSILVER SPRING 11/24/2004 00454.07500 39-01-01.3 N MD MD KNLQ630 076-50-40.8 W 0001949441 JOHN L. CRUMP DBA: ACE COMMUNICWALDORF 11/24/2004 00454.07500 38-37-07.4 N VA MD KNLQ630 077-50-05.9 W 0001949441 JOHN L. CRUMP DBA: ACE COMMUNICWARRENTON 11/24/2004 00454.07500 38-54-31.4 N DC MD KNLQ630 076-53-58.9 W 0001949441 JOHN L. CRUMP DBA: ACE COMMUNICWASHINGTON 11/24/2004 00454.07500 38-52-00.4 N DC MD KNLQ630 077-04-43.9 W 0001949441 JOHN L. CRUMP DBA: ACE
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255109A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255109A1.txt
    • Page 20 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA NE 118-23-05.7 W 0001952308 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership Redondo Beach 11/29/2004 10568.12500 33-51-20.5 N OH NE 082-13-55.9 W 0001952319 ALLTEL Communications, Inc. Green Township 11/29/2004 06226.89000 38-48-15.2 N CA NE 118-13-01.3 W 0001952943 SOUTHWESTERN BELL MOBILE SYSTELA CANADA FLINTR 11/30/2004 19565.00000 34-11-11.0 N CA NE 117-17-19.9 W 0001953399 SOUTHWESTERN BELL MOBILE SYSTESAN BERNARDINO 11/30/2004 11305.00000 33-57-58.8 N MT NE 108-34-32.0 W 0001953515 International Communications Group, Inc. Billings 11/30/2004 10875.00000 45-45-42.5 N MT NE 108-34-32.0 W 0001953515 International Communications Group, Inc. Billings 11/30/2004 11035.00000 45-45-42.5 N NY NE 074-02-57.4 W 0001954059 SOUTHWESTERN
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255118A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255118A1.txt
    • of gamma-distributed heterogeneity significantly changes the coefficient estimates. The likelihood ratio test for these models rejects the null hypothesis that they yield the same coefficient estimates. An additional one million subscribers multiplies the hazard ratio by 0.87, so that one million subscribers reduce the marginal probability of exit by 13%. Ten million subscribers would create a hazard ratio of (10*(.13)) (1.3) e e - - = = .27, so that ten million subscribers would reduce the probability of exit by 73%. If the observation on the number of subscribers is missing, then the hazard ratio is 0.34, so the probability of exit is 66% lower than the probability of exit if we observe zero subscribers. Thus, observing over 8 million subscribers
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255577A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255577A1.txt
    • Pleasanton 12/13/2004 00949.00000 28-57-38.0 N Page 2 AS - Aural Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NC MD WPWX888 078-36-03.0 W 0001970497 JOYNER RADIO, INC. Oxford 12/14/2004 00945.00000 36-17-44.0 N CO NE 107-40-09.0 W 0001970775 OURAY SCHOOL DISTRICT R1 Ouray 12/14/2004 00949.25000 38-01-27.0 N PA NE 076-14-01.3 W 0001977119 FBS WIRELESS CORPORATION BERWICK 12/17/2004 00950.00000 41-03-18.7 N CD - Paging and Radiotelephone State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City RO KNLN242 0001970049 VALLEY TWO-WAY, INC. 12/14/2004 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255779A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255779A1.txt
    • INC LUBBOCK 12/23/2004 06123.10000 33-35-05.0 N WY NE 107-59-51.9 W 0001983332 Union Telephone Company, Inc. Basin 12/23/2004 06375.14000 44-24-48.2 N WY NE 107-59-51.9 W 0001983332 Union Telephone Company, Inc. Basin 12/23/2004 06685.00000 44-24-48.2 N WY NE 107-59-51.9 W 0001983332 Union Telephone Company, Inc. Basin 12/23/2004 11142.50000 44-24-48.2 N WY NE 107-51-56.0 W 0001983380 Union Telephone Company, Inc. Worland 12/23/2004 06845.00000 44-04-01.3 N WY NE 108-15-37.6 W 0001983407 Union Telephone Company, Inc. Lovell 12/23/2004 11632.50000 44-47-38.4 N CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City ND AM KNKN527 098-13-33.6 W 0001969067 NORTH DAKOTA RSA NO. 3 LIMITED PASanborn 12/22/2004 46-53-28.1 N TX MD KNKA367 095-15-57.0 W 0001979330 Houston Cellular Telephone
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256084A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256084A1.pdf
    • - FCC Eric Einhorn - FCC Cheryl Callahan - FCC Sanford Williams - FCC Deborah Blue - FCC NANC Report and Recommendation on NeuStar's Petition Initial Report Prepared by the Numbering Oversight Working Group; Revised by the NANC May 18, 2004 Table of Contents Page Executive Summary 3 Section 1.0 Introduction 5 1.1 NeuStar's Petition 5 1.2 FCC/NANC Assignment 6 1.3 Scope 6 Section 2.0 NANC's Existing Oversight Requirement 7 Section 3.0 Neutrality 7 3.1 History i.e. LM transfer to NeuStar 7 3.2 Existing Requirements 8 3.3 Publicly Traded Company 11 3.4 Private Company 12 Section 4.0 Enforcement Tools 13 4.1 Audit Requirement 13 4.2 Penalties 13 4.3 Oversight Controls 14 Section 5.0 Summary and Recommendation 14 Section 6.0 List of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256267A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256267A1.txt
    • 97.4 0.0 33,435,294 57.2 1.8 26.0 11.9 3.1 Malta $3,098,774 46.5 7.0 17.8 17.5 11.2 $93,977 70.3 0.0 29.5 0.0 0.1 $394 0.0 0.0100.0 0.0 0.0 22,608,801 29.0 10.5 27.6 17.8 15.1 Netherlands $111,368,352 66.1 0.8 14.5 16.4 2.2 $9,250,560 33.1 5.0 43.4 11.8 6.7 $15,889,017 0.7 97.7 1.6 0.0 0.0 798,023,705 35.4 3.5 33.2 16.7 11.2 Norway $28,785,730 42.3 1.3 15.9 26.1 14.4 $2,235,416 20.2 1.0 12.3 66.0 0.5 $861,416 0.0100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 206,065,128 21.0 2.2 18.7 41.1 17.0 Portugal $31,812,704 76.4 3.2 13.3 3.9 3.2 $1,612,633 68.0 0.0 26.5 4.9 0.5 $8,824 0.0 19.9 10.9 69.2 0.0 180,759,687 50.8 8.9 24.9 6.1 9.3 Spain $114,772,545 55.0 4.0 11.2 26.4 3.5 $3,613,281 34.3 20.8 30.7 8.3 5.9 $12,437,764 0.8
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256480A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256480A1.txt
    • PARTNERSHIP EAST FREETOWN 01/28/2005 10617.50000 41-46-34.3 N MA MD WMQ477 070-55-51.7 W 0002027220 CELLCO PARTNERSHIP EAST FREETOWN 01/28/2005 10618.75000 41-46-34.3 N MA MD WMQ477 070-55-51.7 W 0002027220 CELLCO PARTNERSHIP EAST FREETOWN 01/28/2005 10621.25000 41-46-34.3 N MA MD WMQ477 070-55-51.7 W 0002027220 CELLCO PARTNERSHIP EAST FREETOWN 01/28/2005 10657.50000 41-46-34.3 N MA MD WLW636 070-53-00.1 W 0002027284 CELLCO PARTNERSHIP ACUSHNET 01/28/2005 10552.50000 41-42-01.3 N MA MD WMW424 070-55-35.2 W 0002027509 Cellco Partnership EAST BRIDGEWAT 01/28/2005 10618.12500 41-59-28.4 N NC NE 079-08-01.1 W 0002021838 North Carolina RSA #9, Inc. FAIRMONT 01/25/2005 06165.10000 34-28-56.6 N IA NE 093-19-01.5 W 0002023126 SOUTHERN IOWA REGIONAL INTERNE Allerton 01/26/2005 19460.00000 40-42-21.1 N IA NE 093-19-01.5 W 0002023126 SOUTHERN IOWA REGIONAL INTERNE Allerton 01/26/2005 19620.00000 40-42-21.1 N IA NE
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256927A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256927A1.txt
    • USA INC MONTEREY PARK 02/17/2005 00462.87500 34-04-09.0 N TX MD WPIJ700 095-06-46.0 W 0002053614 Teletouch Licenses, Inc. Rusk 02/18/2005 00072.16000 31-47-23.0 N TX MD WPIJ700 095-06-46.0 W 0002053614 Teletouch Licenses, Inc. Rusk 02/18/2005 00072.76000 31-47-23.0 N MS NE 088-35-57.1 W 0002049331 TELETOUCH LICENSES, INC BOONEVILLE 02/15/2005 00157.74000 34-39-27.3 N AR NE 091-12-30.4 W 0002049331 TELETOUCH LICENSES, INC Brinkley 02/15/2005 00157.74000 34-52-01.3 N MS NE 090-35-50.0 W 0002049331 TELETOUCH LICENSES, INC NEW ALBANY 02/15/2005 00157.74000 34-29-46.4 N AR NE 091-26-35.0 W 0002049331 TELETOUCH LICENSES, INC NEWARK 02/15/2005 00157.74000 35-43-27.8 N AR NE 090-35-50.0 W 0002049331 TELETOUCH LICENSES, INC PARAGOULD 02/15/2005 00157.74000 36-01-46.0 N AR NE 091-33-15.0 W 0002049331 TELETOUCH LICENSES, INC STUTTGART 02/15/2005 00157.74000 34-28-43.0 N Page 22 IK - Industrial/Business Pool
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257545A1.pdf
    • AND LOCATION CALL LETTERS N A T U R E O F A P P L I C A T I O N FILE NUMBER STATE E/P 03/16/2005 Actions of: TELEVISION APPLICATIONS FOR MINOR MODIFICATION TO A CONSTRUCTION PERMIT DISMISSED , GRAND ISLAND CHAN-17 P NE MP (BPCT-940914KG) TO CHANGE OVERALL HEIGHT OF TOWER 610 METERS; HAAT: 614 METERS; TL: 1.3 KM W OF COUNTY HWY, 35 AND SOD TOWN RD INTERSECTION, 11.3 KM SE OF RAVANNA IN BUFFALO COUNTY, NE (40-56-54 98-48-42) TOWER SITE OF EXISTING STATIONS KHAS-TV & KHGI-TV AMENDED 5-21-97 TO CHANGE OVERALL HEIGHT OF TOWER TO 585 METERS; HAAT: 590 METERS HILL BROADCASTING COMPANY, INC. KTVG 27220 BMPCT-19960724KF NE TV TRANSLATOR OR LPTV STATION APPLICATIONS FOR ORIGINAL
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257592A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257592A1.txt
    • TX MD WQCF570 100-13-11.4 W 0002088476 NEXTEL OF TEXAS, INC. CHILDRESS 03/16/2005 00852.71250 34-26-20.2 N TX MD WQCF570 100-13-11.4 W 0002088476 NEXTEL OF TEXAS, INC. CHILDRESS 03/16/2005 00853.43750 34-26-20.2 N TX MD WQCF570 100-13-11.4 W 0002088476 NEXTEL OF TEXAS, INC. CHILDRESS 03/16/2005 00853.43750 34-26-20.2 N MD WQCF571 A 0002088477 NEXTEL OF TEXAS, INC. 03/16/2005 00806.00000 - 00821.00000 TX MD WQCF571 099-45-01.3 W 0002088477 NEXTEL OF TEXAS, INC. CROWELL 03/16/2005 00852.71250 33-59-04.3 N TX MD WQCF571 099-45-01.3 W 0002088477 NEXTEL OF TEXAS, INC. CROWELL 03/16/2005 00852.71250 33-59-04.3 N TX MD WQCF571 099-45-01.3 W 0002088477 NEXTEL OF TEXAS, INC. CROWELL 03/16/2005 00853.43750 33-59-04.3 N TX MD WQCF571 099-45-01.3 W 0002088477 NEXTEL OF TEXAS, INC. CROWELL 03/16/2005 00853.43750 33-59-04.3 N MD WQCF572 A 0002088478
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257820A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257820A1.txt
    • N MT MD KPB34 114-00-50.4 W 0002094001 NorthWestern Corporation, as Debtor-in-PMISSOULA 03/21/2005 06791.25000 47-01-05.7 N MT MD KPB34 114-00-50.4 W 0002094001 NorthWestern Corporation, as Debtor-in-PMISSOULA 03/21/2005 06871.25000 47-01-05.7 N MT MD KPB34 114-00-50.4 W 0002094001 NorthWestern Corporation, as Debtor-in-PMISSOULA 03/21/2005 10563.12500 47-01-05.7 N MT MD WAW887 107-50-34.3 W 0002094199 NorthWestern Corporation, as Debtor-in-PHARDIN 03/21/2005 06543.75000 45-49-50.9 N MT MD WAT665 107-36-01.3 W 0002094221 NorthWestern Corporation, as Debtor-in-PHARDIN 03/21/2005 02145.20000 45-46-00.9 N MT MD WAT665 107-36-01.3 W 0002094221 NorthWestern Corporation, as Debtor-in-PHARDIN 03/21/2005 06713.75000 45-46-00.9 N IL MD WNTW406 P 089-27-53.3 W 0002095402 ILLINOIS POWER COMPANY PRINCETON 03/22/2005 00956.30625 41-22-18.1 N TX MD KYH56 095-48-51.8 W 0002095429 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD ROSENBURG 03/22/2005 06665.00000 29-33-33.8 N TX MD KNK36 095-37-33.0 W 0002095469 UNION
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258342A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258342A1.txt
    • SC MD WZV526 081-01-49.3 W 0002129357 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 1, INC. COPE 04/19/2005 00851.26250 33-21-53.6 N SC MD WZV526 081-01-49.3 W 0002129357 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 1, INC. COPE 04/19/2005 00851.26250 33-21-53.6 N Page 45 YX - SMR, 806-821/851-866 MHz, Trunked State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City SC MD WZV526 081-02-01.3 W 0002129357 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 1, INC. COPE 04/19/2005 00851.13750 33-22-05.6 N SC MD WZV526 081-02-01.3 W 0002129357 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 1, INC. COPE 04/19/2005 00851.13750 33-22-05.6 N MD WZV527 A 0002129358 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 1, INC. 04/19/2005 00806.00000 - 00821.00000 SC MD WZV527 081-06-06.3 W 0002129358 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 1, INC. NORTH 04/19/2005 00806.11250 33-37-25.5 N SC MD WZV527
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258527A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258527A1.txt
    • 35-55-20.1 N NC RM KNKA358 078-51-34.0 W 0002138256 Cellco Partnership MORRISVILLE 04/26/2005 35-55-20.1 N NC RM KNKA358 078-39-04.0 W 0002138256 Cellco Partnership Raleigh 04/26/2005 35-43-20.0 N NC RM KNKA358 078-39-04.0 W 0002138256 Cellco Partnership Raleigh 04/26/2005 35-43-20.0 N NC RM KNKA358 078-39-04.0 W 0002138256 Cellco Partnership Raleigh 04/26/2005 35-43-20.0 N NC RM KNKA358 078-42-14.9 W 0002138256 Cellco Partnership Raleigh 04/26/2005 35-45-01.3 N NC RM KNKA358 078-42-14.9 W 0002138256 Cellco Partnership Raleigh 04/26/2005 35-45-01.3 N NC RM KNKA358 078-42-14.9 W 0002138256 Cellco Partnership Raleigh 04/26/2005 35-45-01.3 N NC RM KNKA358 078-38-21.0 W 0002138256 Cellco Partnership Raleigh 04/26/2005 35-46-32.5 N NC RM KNKA358 078-38-21.0 W 0002138256 Cellco Partnership Raleigh 04/26/2005 35-46-32.5 N NC RM KNKA358 078-38-21.0 W 0002138256 Cellco Partnership Raleigh 04/26/2005 35-46-32.5
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258528A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258528A1.txt
    • OR RM KNKA212 121-47-08.3 W 0002139139 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Government Camp 04/27/2005 45-17-19.4 N OR RM KNKA212 122-25-35.3 W 0002139139 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Gresham 04/27/2005 45-29-44.4 N OR RM KNKA212 122-25-35.3 W 0002139139 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Gresham 04/27/2005 45-29-44.4 N OR RM KNKA212 122-25-35.3 W 0002139139 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Gresham 04/27/2005 45-29-44.4 N OR RM KNKA212 122-33-01.3 W 0002139139 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Happy Valley 04/27/2005 45-27-17.4 N OR RM KNKA212 122-33-01.3 W 0002139139 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Happy Valley 04/27/2005 45-27-17.4 N OR RM KNKA212 122-33-01.3 W 0002139139 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Happy Valley 04/27/2005 45-27-17.4 N OR RM KNKA212 122-45-55.4 W 0002139139 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Hillsboro 04/27/2005 45-35-56.4 N OR RM KNKA212 122-45-55.4 W
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258529A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258529A1.txt
    • Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City RO WPHQ351 0002143373 VALLEY HOSPITAL 04/27/2005 IK - Industrial/Business Pool - Commercial, Conventional State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MS AM 088-35-57.1 W 0002049331 TELETOUCH LICENSES, INC BOONEVILLE 04/27/2005 00157.74000 34-39-27.3 N AR AM 091-12-30.4 W 0002049331 TELETOUCH LICENSES, INC Brinkley 04/27/2005 00157.74000 34-52-01.3 N MS AM 089-01-45.2 W 0002049331 TELETOUCH LICENSES, INC NEW ALBANY 04/27/2005 00157.74000 34-29-46.4 N AR AM 091-26-35.0 W 0002049331 TELETOUCH LICENSES, INC NEWARK 04/27/2005 00157.74000 35-43-27.8 N AR AM 090-35-50.0 W 0002049331 TELETOUCH LICENSES, INC PARAGOULD 04/27/2005 00157.74000 36-01-46.0 N AR AM 091-33-15.0 W 0002049331 TELETOUCH LICENSES, INC STUTTGART 04/27/2005 00157.74000 34-28-43.0 N SC MD WPNT777 082-23-56.5 W 0002138305
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258640A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258640A1.txt
    • N NE NE 102-52-48.7 W 0002148659 BNSF Railway Co Alliance 05/04/2005 06805.00000 42-05-35.8 N NC NE 078-51-49.5 W 0002148718 HARRIS CORPORATION MORRISVILLE 05/04/2005 06256.54000 35-52-33.4 N Page 22 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NC NE 078-51-43.8 W 0002148720 HARRIS CORPORATION morrisville 05/04/2005 06004.50000 35-52-01.3 N IN NE 086-17-07.0 W 0002149778 Lock Joint Tube, LLC SOUTH BEND 05/05/2005 22575.00000 41-39-38.0 N IN NE 086-15-19.0 W 0002149779 Lock Joint Tube, LLC SOUTH BEND 05/05/2005 21375.00000 41-37-47.0 N NV NE P 115-49-12.0 W 0002149909 Proxy Aviation Indian Springs 05/05/2005 06425.00000 - 06525.00000 36-36-44.4 N MN NE P 096-03-36.0 W 0002149956 CITY OF DAWSON DAWSON 05/03/2005 00956.41875 44-55-45.0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258716A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258716A1.txt
    • 0002157686 JACOR BROADCASTING CORPORATIOCINCINNATI 05/11/2005 00950.12500 39-06-18.0 N OH MD WMG532 084-33-25.0 W 0002157686 JACOR BROADCASTING CORPORATIOCINCINNATI 05/11/2005 00951.00000 39-06-18.0 N WA MD WMU276 117-29-54.2 W 0002157900 UPPER COLUMBIA MEDIA ASSOCIATIOSPOKANE 05/11/2005 00946.50000 47-37-15.1 N WA MD WMU276 117-29-54.2 W 0002157900 UPPER COLUMBIA MEDIA ASSOCIATIOSPOKANE 05/11/2005 00946.50000 47-37-15.1 N NY MD WJN20 073-42-01.8 W 0002157941 WMHT EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICTROY 05/11/2005 00950.00000 42-41-01.3 N WI MD WLG967 089-37-27.0 W 0002160590 WRIG, INC. Wausau 05/13/2005 00947.50000 44-51-37.0 N TX NE 094-02-41.0 W 0002155140 ARKLATEX, INC. TEXARKANA 05/10/2005 00947.00000 33-25-33.0 N TX NE 094-02-41.0 W 0002155299 ARKLATEX, LLC TEXARKANA 05/10/2005 00950.75000 33-25-33.0 N NM NE 108-12-55.0 W 0002155459 CAPSTAR TX LIMITED PARTNERSHIPFARMINGTON 05/10/2005 00946.50000 36-39-49.0 N TN NE 085-31-26.9 W 0002156072 CLEAR CHANNEL BROADCASTING LICCOOKEVILLE
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-259702A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-259702A1.txt
    • AF - Aeronautical and Fixed State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OH NE 081-26-32.8 W 0002210555 Aeronautical Radio Inc Akron 06/21/2005 00130.72500 40-54-58.7 N AZ NE 113-56-17.0 W 0002210566 Aeronautical Radio Inc Kingman 06/21/2005 00131.32500 35-15-34.1 N TX NE 098-28-11.2 W 0002210568 Aeronautical Radio Inc San Antonio 06/21/2005 00130.65000 29-32-01.3 N GA NE 084-31-16.9 W 0002210575 Aeronautical Radio Inc Atlanta 06/21/2005 00136.85000 33-46-44.9 N CA NE 122-17-36.5 W 0002210583 Aeronautical Radio Inc Redding 06/21/2005 00136.85000 40-30-32.3 N WA NE 119-19-12.7 W 0002210588 Aeronautical Radio Inc Moses Lake 06/21/2005 00136.85000 47-12-27.8 N CO NE 104-50-57.5 W 0002210605 Aeronautical Radio Inc Denver 06/21/2005 00136.85000 39-34-12.5 N MN NE 092-29-56.4 W 0002210611 Aeronautical
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-259829A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-259829A1.txt
    • 26-45-54.0 N FL NE 081-21-49.3 W 0002217160 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 1, INC. CARNESTOWN 06/27/2005 06746.25000 25-54-36.3 N FL NE 081-14-19.4 W 0002217161 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 1, INC. CLEWISTON 06/27/2005 06785.62500 26-26-42.8 N FL NE 081-14-19.4 W 0002217161 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 1, INC. CLEWISTON 06/27/2005 06815.62500 26-26-42.8 N FL NE 081-20-59.3 W 0002217163 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 1, INC. IMMOKALEE 06/27/2005 06586.25000 26-08-01.3 N FL NE 081-20-59.3 W 0002217163 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 1, INC. IMMOKALEE 06/27/2005 06826.25000 26-08-01.3 N HI NE 159-36-45.4 W 0002217382 NEXTEL WIP LICENSE CORP. Kaumakanai 06/27/2005 11131.25000 21-55-51.2 N HI NE 159-40-00.7 W 0002217421 NEXTEL WIP LICENSE CORP. Waimea 06/27/2005 11621.25000 21-57-24.7 N FL NE 081-24-01.8 W 0002217719 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 1, INC. SUNNILAND 06/27/2005 06625.62500 26-18-36.8 N FL
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-259960A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-259960A1.txt
    • CITY 07/08/2005 19460.00000 41-08-07.9 N IN MD WQCU495 085-29-16.1 W 0002233427 WHITLEY COUNTY CONSOLIDATED SCCOLUMBIA CITY 07/08/2005 19620.00000 41-08-07.9 N WA MD WPOT795 122-28-05.4 W 0002233789 PIERCE, COUNTY OF TACOMA 07/08/2005 05974.85000 47-13-42.3 N WA MD WPOT795 122-28-05.4 W 0002233789 PIERCE, COUNTY OF TACOMA 07/08/2005 06555.00000 47-13-42.3 N WA MD WNEV796 121-53-34.3 W 0002233790 PIERCE, COUNTY OF ENUMCLAW 07/08/2005 02192.00000 47-07-01.3 N WA MD WNEV796 121-53-34.3 W 0002233790 PIERCE, COUNTY OF ENUMCLAW 07/08/2005 06725.00000 47-07-01.3 N CA MD KET60 122-15-09.9 W 0002234607 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF YOUNTVILLE 07/08/2005 06865.00000 38-26-22.7 N CA MD KNI83 122-06-21.9 W 0002234608 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF VACAVILLE 07/08/2005 02134.00000 38-24-01.7 N CA MD KNI83 122-06-21.9 W 0002234608 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF VACAVILLE 07/08/2005 02148.40000 38-24-01.7 N Page 38 MW
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260261A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260261A1.txt
    • CORPORATION AKRON 07/19/2005 17760.00000 41-05-09.2 N OH NE 081-30-20.4 W 0002245278 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION AKRON 07/19/2005 17800.00000 41-05-09.2 N Page 23 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OH NE 081-30-20.4 W 0002245278 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION AKRON 07/19/2005 17840.00000 41-05-09.2 N CA NE 118-09-01.3 W 0002245931 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership Lancaster 07/19/2005 11687.50000 34-39-58.9 N PR NE 066-25-07.5 W 0002245990 SAN JUAN CELLULAR TELEPHONE COVEGA BAJA 07/19/2005 10572.50000 18-28-39.8 N OH NE 081-35-25.9 W 0002246844 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION BARBERTON 07/20/2005 19440.00000 41-02-06.0 N OH NE 081-35-25.9 W 0002246844 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION BARBERTON 07/20/2005 19480.00000 41-02-06.0 N OH NE 081-29-22.0 W 0002246845 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION AKRON 07/20/2005
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260366A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260366A1.txt
    • State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City AK AM 149-52-39.0 W 0002163878 CAPSTAR TX LIMITED PARTNERSHIPANCHORAGE 07/26/2005 00455.35313 61-11-50.0 N AK AM P 149-52-39.0 W 0002163878 CAPSTAR TX LIMITED PARTNERSHIPANCHORAGE 07/26/2005 00455.55313 61-11-50.0 N AK AM 149-52-39.0 W 0002163878 CAPSTAR TX LIMITED PARTNERSHIPANCHORAGE 07/26/2005 00455.55313 61-11-50.0 N CO NE P 108-35-01.3 W 0002255564 CUMULUS LICENSING LLC Grand Junction 07/27/2005 00455.45000 39-04-48.9 N TI - TV Intercity Relay State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TX MD WLO940 095-13-13.0 W 0002255757 CIVCO, INC. HAWKINS 07/27/2005 06950.00000 - 06975.00000 32-32-24.0 N TX MD WLE948 095-13-13.0 W 0002255825 CIVCO, INC. HAWKINS 07/27/2005 07050.00000 -
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260437A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260437A1.txt
    • yet been assigned to carriers. 2 Unduplicated total. Note: Figures may not add due to rounding. 13 Table 4 Telephone Number Utilization by State as of December 31, 2004 Assigned Intermediate Reserved Aging Administrative Available1 Total State/jurisdiction 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s Alabama 7,733 38.5 503 2.5 213 1.1 605 3.0 262 1.3 10,744 53.6 20,060 Alaska 1,081 24.5 19 0.4 15 0.3 54 1.2 17 0.4 3,216 73.1 4,403 Arizona 10,528 53.3 455 2.3 189 1.0 626 3.2 162 0.8 7,782 39.4 19,741 Arkansas 3,769 26.7 765 5.4 88 0.6 245 1.7 316 2.2 8,915 63.2 14,098 California 66,419 43.6 7,558 5.0 1,019 0.7 3,204 2.1 2,104 1.4 72,048 47.3 152,351 Colorado
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260438A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260438A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260438A1.txt
    • numbering resource utilization statistics based on December 2004 data that carriers submitted to the North American Numbering Plan Administrator (NANPA), as well as other information. Tracking number utilization is one of a number of initiatives taken by the Commission to ensure that limited numbering resources are used efficiently. Summary Data Utilization Statistics by Carrier Type - Reporting carriers have over 1.3 billion telephone numbers, of which nearly 550 million were assigned to customers, more than 665 million were available to be assigned, and about 86 million were used for other purposes, such as for administrative use. Following are utilization statistics by carrier type as of December 31, 2004: Overall, 42.2% of all telephone numbers were assigned to customers. The overall utilization
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260456A1.pdf
    • DELETED PER LICENSEE'S REQUEST ON 8-3-2005. (NO LETTER SENT) THE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION DK216CM 66598 BLFT-19940729TA CA FM TRANSLATOR APPLICATIONS FOR ORIGINAL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT PERMIT CANCELLED , MINERAL, ETC. 90.7 MHZ P CA CP NEW FM TRANSLATOR TO SERVE MINERAL, CA, CH 214, 90.7 MHZ, PRIMARY STATION KFPR(FM), REDDING, CA, CH 205, 88.9 MHZ, (NL: 40-21-21, WL: 121-32-40), TL: RADIO FACILITY, 1.3 KM SW OF JUNCTION OF ROUTES 36 AND 89, NEAR MORGAN SUMMIT, 4 KM EAST OF MINERAL, CA, ERP 0.013 KW (V). CP cancelled and callsign deleted 8/5/2005 per applicant's request - no letter sent THE UNIV. FOUNDATION, CA STATE UNIV. DK214BQ 66561 BPFT-19930129TE CA Page 15 of 16 Broadcast Actions 8/10/2005 PUBLIC NOTICEFederal Communications Commission 445 Twelfth Street SW
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260567A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260567A1.txt
    • AF - Aeronautical and Fixed State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OH NE 083-47-31.6 W 0002267798 Aeronautical Radio Inc Wilmington 08/08/2005 00131.25000 39-25-40.5 N SC NE 081-07-10.3 W 0002267800 Aeronautical Radio Inc Columbia 08/08/2005 00130.95000 33-56-19.8 N TX NE 098-28-11.2 W 0002267801 Aeronautical Radio Inc San Antonio 08/08/2005 00136.50000 29-32-01.3 N MS NE 089-04-12.4 W 0002267802 Aeronautical Radio Inc Gulfport 08/08/2005 00131.95000 30-24-26.2 N TX NE 101-49-22.0 W 0002267804 Aeronautical Radio Inc Lubbock 08/08/2005 00136.85000 33-39-49.1 N TX NE 098-14-19.0 W 0002267808 Aeronautical Radio Inc McAllen 08/08/2005 00136.85000 26-10-33.0 N TX NE 097-39-15.8 W 0002267830 Aeronautical Radio Inc Harlingon 08/08/2005 00136.85000 26-13-42.6 N TX NE 097-30-04.4 W 0002267832 Aeronautical Radio
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.txt
    • 13,144.314,154.8 80,726 17.5 1995 14,159.8 1,759.4 514.2 119.3 6.3 47.9 15,023.416,606.8 85,475 19.4 1996 14,234.1 3,642.7 660.7 118.9 5.0 26.1 15,409.118,687.5 93,361 20.0 1997 15,250.4 4,113.1 850.9 109.8 3.5 28.3 16,654.220,356.0 $89,193100,793 18.7%20.2 1998 14,246.4 4,798.3 921.5 50.5 2.7 36.3 15,737.220,055.7 91,607105,055 17.2 19.1 1999 14,527.6 4,528.0 1,215.9 56.8 1.6 30.8 16,285.520,360.8 93,311108,246 17.5 18.8 2000 14,172.2 7,366.7 1,501.9 32.7 1.3 250.6 16,751.423,381.4 87,767109,615 19.1 21.3 2001 10,844.4 5,341.8 1,467.0 10.3 0.3 199.2 13,392.318,200.0 79,302 99,301 16.9 18.3 2002 9,446.4 5,100.7 988.1 5/ 5/ 112.8 12,005.916,596.6 67,222 83,697 17.9 19.8 2003 8,401.7 5,750.3 620.5 5/ 5/ 156.1 10,303.415,478.7 58,983 77,188 17.5 20.1 See notes at the end of the tables. Table 2 International Telephone Service Per-Minute Data 1/ (Revenues, Payouts, Receipts
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261169A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261169A1.txt
    • 39-54-48.5 N CO NE 105-00-38.5 W 0002309229 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION DENVER 09/12/2005 21875.00000 39-43-46.6 N CO NE 105-00-38.5 W 0002309229 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION DENVER 09/12/2005 22220.00000 39-43-46.6 N NC NE 077-58-08.9 W 0002309371 Conterra LLC Nashville 09/13/2005 19520.00000 36-04-43.9 N NC NE 077-49-16.3 W 0002309420 Conterra Battleboro 09/13/2005 11405.00000 36-02-16.2 N CO NE 104-49-31.6 W 0002309574 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION Colorado Springs 09/13/2005 10715.00000 38-50-01.3 N CO NE 104-49-31.6 W 0002309574 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION Colorado Springs 09/13/2005 11185.00000 38-50-01.3 N CO NE 104-59-57.2 W 0002309575 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION Westminster 09/13/2005 11245.00000 39-55-22.3 N NC NE 077-53-56.6 W 0002310355 Conterra LLC Whitaker 09/13/2005 10795.00000 36-06-28.4 N Page 12 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261303A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261303A1.txt
    • CITY 09/19/2005 00950.00000 28-58-52.1 N FL MD WLI489 080-10-11.0 W 0002321365 JCE LICENSES, L.L.C. FORT LAUDERDAL 09/20/2005 00950.25000 26-09-13.0 N FL MD WLI489 080-10-11.0 W 0002321365 JCE LICENSES, L.L.C. FORT LAUDERDAL 09/20/2005 00950.25000 26-09-13.0 N FL MD WPXX389 080-10-11.0 W 0002321420 JCE LICENSES, L.L.C. FORT LAUDERDAL 09/20/2005 00951.91000 26-09-13.0 N OH MD WLD517 081-40-51.9 W 0002322132 IDEASTREAM CLEVELAND 09/21/2005 00945.00000 41-30-01.3 N MA MD WMF918 072-31-43.3 W 0002323123 UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST 09/21/2005 00948.50000 42-23-06.3 N MA MD WQAU501 072-31-45.0 W 0002323127 UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST 09/21/2005 00946.87500 42-22-55.0 N AL MD WPNB685 087-40-59.9 W 0002323860 GULF COAST BROADCASTING CO., INCGULF SHORES 09/22/2005 00946.87500 30-16-37.7 N AL MD WPNB685 087-40-59.9 W 0002323860 GULF COAST BROADCASTING CO., INCGULF SHORES 09/22/2005 00947.00000 30-16-37.7
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261555A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261555A1.txt
    • 0002342359 Omnipoint NY MTA License, LLC Bishop 10/07/2005 17935.00000 37-44-23.0 N CA NE 119-01-03.6 W 0002342386 Omnipoint NY MTA License, LLC Mammoth Lakes 10/07/2005 19495.00000 37-38-13.0 N CA NE 118-14-36.5 W 0002342387 Omnipoint NY MTA License, LLC BIG PINE 10/07/2005 05945.20000 37-03-25.8 N CA NE 118-37-50.1 W 0002342391 Omnipoint NY MTA License, LLC Bishop 10/07/2005 10587.50000 37-32-42.3 N CA NE 118-00-01.3 W 0002342395 Omnipoint NY MTA License, LLC Olancha 10/07/2005 10642.50000 36-12-34.0 N NV NE 115-30-01.8 W 0002342398 Omnipoint NY MTA License, LLC Jean 10/07/2005 17785.00000 35-57-54.9 N NV NE 115-30-54.4 W 0002342402 Omnipoint NY MTA License, LLC Las Vegas 10/07/2005 19345.00000 36-01-32.8 N CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261981A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261981A1.txt
    • Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CO AM 104-47-37.4 W 0002309227 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION Colorado Springs 10/26/2005 21875.00000 38-47-52.2 N CO AM 104-47-37.4 W 0002309227 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION Colorado Springs 10/26/2005 21970.00000 38-47-52.2 N CO AM 104-49-31.6 W 0002309574 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION Colorado Springs 10/27/2005 10715.00000 38-50-01.3 N CO AM 104-49-31.6 W 0002309574 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION Colorado Springs 10/27/2005 11115.00000 38-50-01.3 N CO AM 104-49-31.6 W 0002309574 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION Colorado Springs 10/27/2005 11185.00000 38-50-01.3 N CO AM 104-49-31.6 W 0002309574 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION Colorado Springs 10/27/2005 23075.00000 38-50-01.3 N CO AM 104-49-31.6 W 0002309574 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION Colorado Springs 10/27/2005 23125.00000 38-50-01.3 N CO AM 104-49-31.6 W 0002309574 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262084A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262084A1.txt
    • Telephone N83 M84J84N84 M85J85N85M86J86N86M87J87N87M88J88N88M89J89N89M90J90N90M91J91N91M92J92N92M93J93N93M94J94N94M95J95N95M96J96N96M97J97N97M98J98N98M99J99N99M00J00N00M01J01N01M02J02N02M03J03N03M04J04N04M05J05 In Housing Unit Available Telephone Penetration Households 7 Table 2 Telephone Penetration by State (Percentage of Households with Telephone Service) State Alabama 87.9% 92.7% 4.8% * Alaska 83.8 94.9 11.1 * Arizona 88.8 92.2 3.5 * Arkansas 88.2 87.4 -0.8 California 91.7 96.4 4.7 * Colorado 94.4 95.8 1.4 Connecticut 95.5 95.2 -0.3 Delaware 95.0 93.7 -1.3 District of Columbia 94.7 93.1 -1.6 Florida 85.5 93.0 7.5 * Georgia 88.9 92.2 3.3 * Hawaii 94.6 96.3 1.7 Idaho 89.5 95.6 6.1 * Illinois 95.0 90.6 -4.4 Indiana 90.3 90.9 0.6 Iowa 95.4 95.6 0.2 Kansas 94.9 95.5 0.6 Kentucky 86.9 92.7 5.8 * Louisiana 88.9 92.6 3.7 * Maine 90.7 96.6 5.9 * Maryland 96.3 95.6 -0.7
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262086A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262086A1.txt
    • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Table 1.3 - Changes Affecting Coverage of Table 1.2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262330A1.txt
    • -- Residential Services (Using Company Provided Composites) Chart 4 Percent Residential Installation Commitments Met Large Price-Cap Carriers 97.0 97.5 98.0 98.5 99.0 99.5 100.0 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Years Percent o f Co mmitments M et Weighted BOC/Sprint Composite* Weighted Verizon Avg BellSouth Weighted SBC Avg. Qwest 17 ARMIS 43-05 Report 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 BellSouth 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 Qwest 1.1 1.0 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 SBC Ameritech 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.1 1.5 1.4 SBC Pacific 1.5 1.8 1.3 1.2 1.5 1.6 SBC Southwestern 0.8 0.8 2.2 1.8 1.9 2.0 SBC SNET 2.1 2.2 1.8 1.0 1.0 1.0 Verizon GTE 1.4 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.6 Verizon North (Combined with Verizon South) Verizon South
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262498A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262498A1.txt
    • 104-59-06.7 W 0002309573 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION DENVER 11/21/2005 10715.00000 39-44-39.8 N CO AM WQCR902 104-59-06.7 W 0002309573 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION DENVER 11/21/2005 23070.00000 39-44-39.8 N CO AM WQCR902 104-59-06.7 W 0002309573 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION DENVER 11/21/2005 23170.00000 39-44-39.8 N CO AM WQCR902 104-59-06.7 W 0002309573 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION DENVER 11/21/2005 23275.00000 39-44-39.8 N CO AM 104-49-31.6 W 0002309574 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION Colorado Springs 11/21/2005 10715.00000 38-50-01.3 N CO AM 104-49-31.6 W 0002309574 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION Colorado Springs 11/21/2005 11115.00000 38-50-01.3 N CO AM 104-49-31.6 W 0002309574 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION Colorado Springs 11/21/2005 11185.00000 38-50-01.3 N CO AM 104-49-31.6 W 0002309574 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION Colorado Springs 11/21/2005 23075.00000 38-50-01.3 N CO AM 104-49-31.6 W 0002309574 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION Colorado Springs 11/21/2005 23125.00000 38-50-01.3 N CO AM 104-49-31.6 W 0002309574 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262590A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262590A1.txt
    • N AS - Aural Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City AL AM 086-39-35.4 W 0002281099 OAKWOOD COLLEGE HUNTSVILLE 11/29/2005 00951.00000 34-44-40.8 N NE AM WLG887 100-45-40.5 W 0002285886 TRI-STATE BROADCASTING ASSOCIATNORTH PLATTE 11/28/2005 00947.00000 41-07-55.9 N OH AM WLD517 081-40-51.9 W 0002322132 IDEASTREAM CLEVELAND 11/28/2005 00945.00000 41-30-01.3 N IN AM 086-09-10.0 W 0002338719 RADIO ONE OF INDIANA, LLC INDIANAPOLIS 11/30/2005 00948.50000 39-46-02.0 N NC MD WPNF947 080-53-13.0 W 0002391602 CLEAR CHANNEL BROADCASTING LICCHARLOTTE 11/28/2005 00945.00000 35-11-33.9 N VA MD WPQP675 077-30-55.0 W 0002391931 CAPSTAR TX LIMITED PARTNERSHIPRICHMOND 11/28/2005 00949.00000 37-36-53.0 N VA MD WPQL775 077-30-55.0 W 0002392189 CC LICENSES, LLC RICHMOND 11/28/2005 00951.00000 37-36-53.0 N VA MD
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262837A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262837A1.txt
    • (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City VA MD WQDF389 077-32-36.9 W 0002407256 IDT Spectrum, LLC RICHMOND 12/13/2005 21520.00000 37-29-57.5 N CA MD WML451 115-29-34.9 W 0002407536 The Ponderosa Telephone Company CIMA 12/13/2005 02128.00000 35-13-56.9 N CA MD WML451 115-29-34.9 W 0002407536 The Ponderosa Telephone Company CIMA 12/13/2005 06315.84000 35-13-56.9 N WA MD KZS82 122-37-43.4 W 0002407588 Qwest Corporation BREMERTON 12/13/2005 17720.00000 47-34-01.3 N VA MD WQCS876 077-24-49.7 W 0002407913 IDT Spectrum, LLC RICHMOND 12/14/2005 19320.00000 37-33-52.5 N VA MD WQCS876 077-24-49.7 W 0002407913 IDT Spectrum, LLC RICHMOND 12/14/2005 21370.00000 37-33-52.5 N NY MD WMM940 079-17-11.7 W 0002408526 NEW YORK RSA NO. 3 CELLULAR PARTNERSHIP JAMESTOWN 12/14/2005 02121.60000 42-05-06.6 N NY MD WMM940 079-17-11.7 W 0002408526 NEW YORK RSA NO. 3 CELLULAR PARTNERSHIP
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262963A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262963A1.txt
    • 12/19/2005 06620.00000 40-05-31.0 N OH MD WML857 082-24-28.0 W 0002416312 New Par NEWARK 12/19/2005 06665.00000 40-05-31.0 N WY MD WMR890 109-55-31.5 W 0002416412 UNION TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. PINDALE 12/19/2005 11622.50000 42-50-38.7 N WY MD WPNG931 108-26-25.4 W 0002416421 UNION TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. RIVERTON 12/19/2005 05945.20000 43-02-34.9 N WY MD WQCL808 107-51-56.0 W 0002416424 Union Telephone Company, Inc. Worland 12/19/2005 06585.00000 44-04-01.3 N MA MD WQBN299 071-04-29.0 W 0002416429 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION BOSTON 12/19/2005 11215.00000 42-20-57.0 N NM MD WLR328 107-13-39.1 W 0002417012 NEW MEXICO RSA 3 LIMITED PARTNERTRUTH OR CONSE 12/19/2005 06655.00000 32-58-04.3 N WY MD WPWM478 109-11-32.0 W 0002417443 UNION TELEPHONE COMPANY ROCK SPRINGS 12/20/2005 06655.00000 41-33-54.7 N Page 7 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
    • Subscribership - Household - United States ........................................................... Table 6.1 Switch Downtime and Trunk Blocking ................................................................... Table 9.2 Switch Downtime Causes ....................................................................................... Table 9.3 Switching Systems .................................................................................................. Table 10.1 5 Index of Tables and Charts Taxes ................................................................................................................ Table 11.11 Telecommunications Industry Revenues by Service ............................................. Table 1.2 Telecommunications Industry Revenues - Total ...................................................Table 1.1 Telecommunications Revenues by Type of Carrier ..............................................Table 1.3 Telecommunications Revenues - Interstate ........................................................ Table 1.16 Telecommunications Revenues - Intrastate ........................................................ Table 1.15 Telecommunications Revenues - Total - by State ................................................. Table 1.13 Telecommunications Revenues - 2002................................... ................... Table 1.14 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs ...........................Table 8.3 Transmission Systems ............................................................................................. Table 10.2 Universal Service Program Requirements and Contribution Factors ..................... Table 1.10 Universal Service Support
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A11.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A11.txt
    • orders.14 14 See supra note 9. BellSouth Qwest SBC SBC SBC SBC Verizon Verizon Verizon Ameritech PacificSouthwestern SNET North South GTE ACCESS SERVICES PROVIDED TO CARRIERS -- SWITCHED ACCESS Percent Installation Commitments Met 100.0 99.8 94.4 95.1 84.9 74.4 99.9 99.8 92.4 Average Installation Interval (days) 19.2 15.0 31.8 20.3 27.6 28.1 28.5 20.1 26.6 Average Repair Interval (hours) 0.6 1.3 4.4 9.6 3.6 0.4 15.0 4.0 9.5 ACCESS SERVICES PROVIDED TO CARRIERS -- SPECIAL ACCESS Percent Installation Commitments Met 99.8 97.9 95.5 98.2 99.1 98.5 91.8 92.8 91.0 Average Installation Interval (days) 14.0 9.0 17.9 16.2 17.4 20.7 21.3 16.5 20.2 Average Repair Interval (hours) 3.3 2.8 4.7 4.3 3.7 3.7 5.4 3.8 17.3 LOCAL SERVICES PROVIDED TO RESIDENTIAL AND
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A2.txt
    • Subscribership - Household - United States ........................................................... Table 6.1 Switch Downtime and Trunk Blocking ................................................................... Table 9.2 Switch Downtime Causes ....................................................................................... Table 9.3 Switching Systems .................................................................................................. Table 10.1 5 Index of Tables and Charts Taxes ................................................................................................................ Table 11.11 Telecommunications Industry Revenues by Service ............................................. Table 1.2 Telecommunications Industry Revenues - Total ...................................................Table 1.1 Telecommunications Revenues by Type of Carrier ..............................................Table 1.3 Telecommunications Revenues - Interstate ........................................................ Table 1.16 Telecommunications Revenues - Intrastate ........................................................ Table 1.15 Telecommunications Revenues - Total - by State ................................................. Table 1.13 Telecommunications Revenues - 2002................................... ................... Table 1.14 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs ...........................Table 8.3 Transmission Systems ............................................................................................. Table 10.2 Universal Service Program Requirements and Contribution Factors ..................... Table 1.10 Universal Service Support
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A3.txt
    • corrections have been made based on supplemental filer information or as a result of audits. Nonetheless, disaggregated data are likely to be less accurate than industry totals. Table 1.1 shows the major components of telecommunications revenues for 1997 through 2004. This table was created by simply aggregating the revenues in the major classifications designated on Form 499-A. Tables 1.2 and 1.3 provide a look at annual industry revenues over time. Generally, Form 499-A revenue data can be tabulated in two distinct ways: by type of service provided and by type of business. Table 1.2 categorizes revenues by type of service and shows, for example, that carriers reported $89.7 billion in wireless service revenues for 2003. This total includes wireless service revenues
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A8.txt
    • 95.5 95.5 0.0 Delaware 94.3 96.0 1.8 * District of Columbia 94.9 91.9 -3.0 # Florida 88.7 93.4 4.7 * Georgia 86.2 91.2 5.0 * Hawaii 93.5 95.4 1.8 * Idaho 90.7 94.8 4.1 * Illinois 94.2 90.1 -4.1 # Indiana 91.6 91.8 0.3 Iowa 96.2 95.4 -0.8 Kansas 94.3 94.8 0.4 Kentucky 88.1 91.4 3.3 * Louisiana 89.7 90.9 1.3 Maine 93.4 96.6 3.2 * Maryland 95.7 93.4 -2.3 # Massachusetts 95.9 96.4 0.5 Michigan 92.8 93.7 0.9 Minnesota 95.8 97.1 1.3 Mississippi 82.4 89.6 7.2 * Missouri 91.5 93.7 2.2 * Montana 91.0 93.5 2.5 * Nebraska 95.7 95.7 0.0 Nevada 90.4 92.2 1.8 New Hampshire 94.3 96.4 2.1 * New Jersey 94.8 95.1 0.3 New Mexico 82.0 91.4
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.txt
    • 1929 19341939 1944 1949 19541959 1964 19691974 1979 1984 19891994 1999 2004 CPI All Items CPI Telephone Services 7 - 6 1978 7.3% 9.0% 0.9% 1979 8.7 13.3 0.7 1980 9.7 12.5 4.6 1981 8.3 8.9 11.7 1982 5.2 3.8 7.2 1983 3.4 3.8 3.6 1984 3.6 3.9 9.2 1985 2.8 3.8 4.7 1986 2.3 1.1 2.7 1987 2.9 4.4 -1.3 1988 3.7 4.4 1.3 1989 3.5 4.6 -0.3 1990 4.1 6.1 -0.4 1991 3.1 3.1 3.5 1992 2.1 2.9 -0.3 1993 2.3 2.7 1.8 1994 2.2 2.7 0.7 1995 2.0 2.5 1.2 1996 1.9 3.3 2.1 1997 1.5 1.7 0.2 1998 1.1 1.6 0.3* 1999 1.5 2.7 0.4 2000 2.3 3.4 -2.3 2001 2.5 1.6 1.3 2002 1.5 2.4 0.2
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263377A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263377A1.txt
    • Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OR AM 122-44-50.1 W 0002345401 TRIBUNE BROADCAST HOLDINGS, INCPortland 01/19/2006 13225.00000 - 13250.00000 45-31-20.5 N MA MD WPYE535 071-14-12.0 W 0002454161 WCVB HEARST-ARGYLE TV, INC. NEEDHAM 01/20/2006 06875.00000 - 06900.00000 42-18-37.0 N NH MD WPYE532 071-35-23.2 W 0002454169 WCVB HEARST-ARGYLE TV, INC. GOFFSTOWN 01/20/2006 07000.00000 - 07025.00000 42-59-01.3 N TX MD WLF630 095-05-30.8 W 0002454324 CIVCO, INC. Troup 01/20/2006 06975.00000 - 07000.00000 32-08-06.8 N PR NE 066-45-35.0 W 0002447328 WESTERN BROADCASTING CORP. OF UTUADO 01/17/2006 07050.00000 - 07075.00000 18-13-59.0 N PR NE 066-58-58.6 W 0002447395 WESTERN BROADCASTING CORP. OF MARICAO 01/17/2006 06975.00000 - 07000.00000 18-08-52.8 N PR NE 066-45-35.0 W 0002447414 WESTERN BROADCASTING CORP. OF UTUADO 01/17/2006 07075.00000
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263555A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263555A1.txt
    • Eastern Pipe Line Company, LALVA 01/25/2006 06845.00000 36-47-57.1 N OK MD KHJ45 098-41-21.3 W 0002459102 Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, LALVA 01/25/2006 06605.00000 36-43-18.1 N OK MD KPN68 099-08-44.3 W 0002459114 Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, LALEDO 01/25/2006 06645.00000 35-50-10.1 N OK MD KPN68 099-08-44.3 W 0002459114 Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, LALEDO 01/25/2006 06765.00000 35-50-10.1 N OK MD KEU59 099-24-01.3 W 0002459133 Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, LELK CITY 01/25/2006 06605.00000 35-20-26.1 N KS MD KEU58 098-11-26.0 W 0002459165 Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, LSPIVEY 01/25/2006 06625.00000 37-23-06.0 N KS MD KEU58 098-11-26.0 W 0002459165 Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, LSPIVEY 01/25/2006 06685.00000 37-23-06.0 N KS MD KCZ64 097-48-38.5 W 0002459173 Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, LHAVEN 01/25/2006 06785.00000 37-54-35.5
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263694A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263694A1.txt
    • 38-14-39.3 N KY RM KNKA266 085-33-44.9 W 0002469247 Cellco Partnership Louisville 02/01/2006 38-14-39.3 N KY RM KNKA266 085-48-14.9 W 0002469247 Cellco Partnership Louisville 02/01/2006 38-15-36.3 N KY RM KNKA266 085-48-14.9 W 0002469247 Cellco Partnership Louisville 02/01/2006 38-15-36.3 N KY RM KNKA266 085-48-14.9 W 0002469247 Cellco Partnership Louisville 02/01/2006 38-15-36.3 N KY RM KNKA266 085-30-45.9 W 0002469247 Cellco Partnership Louisville 02/01/2006 38-16-01.3 N KY RM KNKA266 085-30-45.9 W 0002469247 Cellco Partnership Louisville 02/01/2006 38-16-01.3 N KY RM KNKA266 085-30-45.9 W 0002469247 Cellco Partnership Louisville 02/01/2006 38-16-01.3 N KY RM KNKA266 085-30-45.9 W 0002469247 Cellco Partnership Louisville 02/01/2006 38-16-01.3 N KY RM KNKA266 085-30-42.9 W 0002469247 Cellco Partnership Louisville 02/01/2006 38-18-26.2 N KY RM KNKA266 085-30-42.9 W 0002469247 Cellco Partnership Louisville 02/01/2006 38-18-26.2
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264075A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264075A1.txt
    • 02/24/2006 11215.00000 30-02-12.8 N TX NE 095-21-58.8 W 0002499641 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION SPRING 02/24/2006 11245.00000 30-02-12.8 N TX NE 095-19-46.8 W 0002499890 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION Houston 02/24/2006 19600.00000 30-00-58.8 N CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CO MD KNKN350 104-15-58.1 W 0002499662 SAN ISABEL CELLULAR OF COLORADOModel 02/24/2006 37-22-01.3 N TN MD KNKA334 086-25-11.1 W 0002500463 Verizon Wireless Tennessee PartnershipMurfreesboro 02/24/2006 35-49-05.4 N CR - Rural Radiotelephone State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City RO KNKP389 0002498383 UNITED UTILITIES, INC. 02/23/2006 GM - 800 MHz Conventional SMR (SMR, Site-specific) State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264147A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264147A1.pdf
    • R 190 0 R 193 0 R 196 0 R 199 0 R 202 0 R 205 0 R]/Type/Pages/Parent 222 0 R>> endobj 230 0 obj<> endobj 231 0 obj<>stream xmlns:pdf='http://ns.adobe.com/pdf/1.3/' pdf:Producer='Acrobat Distiller 6.0 (Windows)'> true.mmbpdfpc endstream endobj 232 0 obj<> endobj xref 0 233 0000000000 65535 f 0000006012 00000 n 0000006140 00000 n 0000006248 00000 n 0000007555 00000 n 0000007683 00000 n 0000007791
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264309A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264309A1.txt
    • 0.0 0.1 349,892,172 41.6 3.0 36.1 10.0 9.3 Cyprus $4,833,620 33.3 2.6 50.9 9.6 3.7 $316,051 22.1 0.0 58.5 9.1 10.3 $16,555 0.0 0.0 99.8 0.0 0.2 23,806,742 29.3 4.5 29.5 22.2 14.4 Denmark $17,763,532 53.8 2.7 19.7 17.8 6.0 $2,045,801 27.0 20.0 16.4 28.7 7.9 $3,340,277 0.0100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 201,144,066 33.8 5.6 31.8 20.8 8.0 Finland $9,961,569 55.3 1.3 17.0 15.2 11.2 $672,772 19.3 0.2 40.0 7.3 33.3 $16,412 0.0 99.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 106,756,726 42.4 1.6 30.3 9.9 15.8 France $130,165,828 49.8 3.7 20.7 19.0 6.8 $11,686,278 37.8 1.1 25.0 16.6 19.5 $15,105,012 0.0 99.5 0.1 0.0 0.4 1,092,402,459 30.7 5.0 33.5 17.2 13.5 Germany $309,803,824 36.2 1.4 15.3 44.2 2.9 $23,081,780 54.2 0.7 14.2 24.2 6.8 $17,658,501
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264457A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264457A1.txt
    • Limited Partnership ANAHEIM 03/13/2006 19650.00000 33-51-03.0 N CA MD WMR963 117-53-51.2 W 0002523301 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership ANAHEIM 03/13/2006 19670.00000 33-50-18.0 N CA MD WPQP216 118-08-05.3 W 0002523420 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership LONG BEACH 03/13/2006 10642.50000 33-50-03.0 N NC MD WPUT353 081-53-43.4 W 0002523542 North Carolina RSA #4, Inc. FOREST CITY 03/13/2006 10552.50000 35-19-40.9 N CA MD WMW223 118-31-01.3 W 0002524304 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNEENCINO 03/14/2006 10755.00000 34-09-45.0 N CA MD WMR316 117-56-47.2 W 0002524603 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNELA PUENTE 03/14/2006 10582.50000 34-03-02.0 N CA MD WMJ849 117-58-25.2 W 0002524629 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNECITY OF INDUSTRY 03/14/2006 10647.50000 34-01-12.0 N CA MD WQDI312 116-56-16.1 W 0002524646 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership Lucerne Valley 03/14/2006 10622.50000 34-26-35.3
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264548A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264548A1.txt
    • Fixed State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CO NE 104-42-00.9 W 0002541673 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Colorado Springs 03/23/2006 00129.00000 38-48-20.9 N MD NE 077-43-46.2 W 0002541675 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Hagerstown 03/23/2006 00129.70000 39-42-28.6 N TX NE 098-28-11.2 W 0002541676 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc San Antonio 03/23/2006 00131.95000 29-32-01.3 N SC NE 080-02-25.9 W 0002541680 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Charleston 03/23/2006 00130.95000 32-53-55.1 N TX NE 096-51-06.4 W 0002541681 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Dallas 03/23/2006 00131.95000 32-50-49.6 N FL NE 082-32-04.2 W 0002541685 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Tampa 03/23/2006 00136.85000 27-57-36.4 N CA NE 122-13-14.6 W 0002541691 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Oakland 03/23/2006 00131.97500 37-43-16.6 N MS NE 088-35-29.9
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264878A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264878A1.txt
    • INC. CONROE 04/05/2006 06615.00000 30-17-16.0 N TX MD KXO20 095-27-19.0 W 0002560688 ENTERGY SERVICES, INC. CONROE 04/05/2006 06635.00000 30-17-16.0 N CA MD WQEJ243 118-15-20.0 W 0002560799 Nextweb Inc. Los Angeles 04/05/2006 19380.00000 34-02-52.0 N CA MD WPRX786 121-55-17.0 W 0002560881 Nextweb Inc Pleasanton 04/05/2006 21985.00000 37-37-12.0 N MA MD WPJA282 P 071-05-34.1 W 0002561561 TAUNTON, CITY OF TAUNTON 04/05/2006 00956.40625 41-54-01.3 N TX MD WAO57 094-29-00.7 W 0002561981 Southwestern Electric Power Company MARSHALL 04/06/2006 02196.80000 32-27-39.5 N TX MD WAO57 094-29-00.7 W 0002561981 Southwestern Electric Power Company MARSHALL 04/06/2006 06655.00000 32-27-39.5 N TX MD WAP585 094-23-39.7 W 0002562097 Southwestern Electric Power Company MARSHALL 04/06/2006 02146.80000 32-32-16.5 N TX MD WAP585 094-23-39.7 W 0002562097 Southwestern Electric Power Company MARSHALL 04/06/2006 06815.00000 32-32-16.5
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265106A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265106A1.txt
    • for administrative purposes only and do not in any way prejudice Commission action. E060108 SES-LIC-20060407-00594E Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Application for Authority Intelsat LLC Nature of Service:Fixed Satellite Service 39 � 35 ' 58.00 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 17625 Technology Boulevard, Washington, Hagerstown, MD 77 � 45 ' 22.00 " W LONG. LOCATION: Orbit Marine 1 1.3 meters ANTENNA ID: 7103-C Digital data 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 862KG7W Digital data 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 1M72G7W 46.00 dBW Digital data 5925.0000 - 5965.0000 MHz 862KG7W 46.00 dBW Digital data 5925.0000 - 5965.0000 MHz 1M72G7W 46.00 dBW Digital data 6421.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 862KG7W 46.00 dBW Digital data 6421.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 1M72G7W Points of Communication: Page 1 of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265169A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265169A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265169A1.txt
    • numbering resource utilization statistics based on June 2005 data that carriers submitted to the North American Numbering Plan Administrator (NANPA), as well as other information. Tracking number utilization is one of a number of initiatives taken by the Commission to ensure that limited numbering resources are used efficiently. Summary Data Utilization Statistics by Carrier Type - Reporting carriers have over 1.3 billion telephone numbers, of which nearly 565 million were assigned to customers, nearly 659 million were available to be assigned, and about 90 million were used for other purposes, such as for administrative use. Following are utilization statistics by carrier type as of June 30, 2005: Overall, 43.0% of all telephone numbers were assigned to customers. The overall utilization rate
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265170A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265170A1.txt
    • % 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s Alabama 7,958 39.1 471 2.3 241 1.2 496 2.4 289 1.4 10,906 53.6 20,362 Alaska 1,137 24.3 22 0.5 14 0.3 48 1.0 38 0.8 3,413 73.0 4,672 Arizona 10,913 54.3 433 2.2 170 0.8 618 3.1 161 0.8 7,801 38.8 20,097 Arkansas 4,101 29.2 766 5.4 86 0.6 253 1.8 185 1.3 8,674 61.7 14,066 California 68,406 44.2 7,955 5.1 919 0.6 3,578 2.3 2,095 1.4 71,712 46.4 154,666 Colorado 10,511 52.8 70 0.4 132 0.7 539 2.7 257 1.3 8,396 42.2 19,905 Connecticut 6,735 44.1 394 2.6 236 1.5 288 1.9 199 1.3 7,431 48.6 15,283 Delaware 2,292 53.2 29 0.7 91 2.1 78 1.8 21 0.5 1,796 41.7 4,308 District
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265186A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265186A1.txt
    • L.L.C. Birmingham 04/25/2006 00947.50000 33-31-29.4 N CA MD WPWH701 117-02-20.0 W 0002584674 EDUCATIONAL MEDIA FOUNDATION Yucaipa 04/26/2006 00951.50000 34-00-42.0 N SD MD WPOT271 096-47-02.1 W 0002585059 FELLER BROADCASTING, LLC SIOUX FALLS 04/27/2006 00944.12500 43-31-32.8 N SD MD WPOT271 096-47-02.1 W 0002585059 FELLER BROADCASTING, LLC SIOUX FALLS 04/27/2006 00951.62500 43-31-32.8 N OH MD WLD517 081-40-51.9 W 0002585456 IDEASTREAM CLEVELAND 04/27/2006 00945.00000 41-30-01.3 N MI NE 083-11-59.0 W 0002582666 PLONTA BROADCASTING INC. Gagetown 04/25/2006 00951.50000 43-42-24.0 N MI NE 085-35-39.0 W 0002582679 NORTHERN RADIO OF GAYLORD, INC.TRAVERSE CITY 04/25/2006 00944.25000 44-44-58.0 N SD NE 096-48-28.0 W 0002585067 FELLER BROADCASTING, LLC BALTIC 04/27/2006 00951.62500 43-45-48.0 N Page 2 AS - Aural Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265386A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265386A1.txt
    • W 0002606047 HARRIS CORPORATION HONOR 05/11/2006 10556.25000 44-43-02.3 N MI NE 086-03-05.8 W 0002606048 HARRIS CORPORATION EMPIRE 05/11/2006 10621.25000 44-48-06.8 N TN NE 084-42-55.1 W 0002606110 HARRIS CORPORATION ROCKWOOD 05/11/2006 10566.25000 35-51-55.2 N TN NE 084-53-39.4 W 0002606112 HARRIS CORPORATION GRASSY COVE 05/11/2006 10631.25000 35-52-02.5 N PA NE 078-34-47.5 W 0002606114 HARRIS CORPORATION CURWENSVILLE 05/11/2006 10556.25000 40-56-40.8 N PA NE 078-33-01.3 W 0002606117 HARRIS CORPORATION CLEARFIELD 05/11/2006 10621.25000 41-04-14.6 N ID NE 115-41-26.3 W 0002606215 Intermountain Communications Mountain Home 05/11/2006 06625.00000 43-07-34.6 N ID NE 115-26-03.3 W 0002606232 Intermountian Communciations Mountain Home 05/11/2006 06785.00000 43-14-56.6 N KS NE P 099-02-00.6 W 0002606275 ONEOK, Inc. Natoma 05/11/2006 00956.43125 39-07-34.7 N KS NE P 099-02-00.6 W 0002606275 ONEOK, Inc. Natoma 05/11/2006 00956.43125 39-07-34.7
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265627A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265627A1.txt
    • Holland 05/25/2006 11325.00000 41-35-14.0 N IL NE 087-36-54.0 W 0002628799 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION South Holland 05/25/2006 11525.00000 41-35-14.0 N KS NE 094-41-18.0 W 0002628929 USCOC NEBRASKA/KANSAS, LLC Fort Scott 05/25/2006 06675.00000 37-49-16.0 N KS NE 094-48-17.0 W 0002628945 USCOC Nebraska/Kansas, LLC MOUND CITY 05/25/2006 06835.00000 38-06-19.0 N IL NE 088-06-50.1 W 0002628959 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION Naperville 05/25/2006 17820.00000 41-47-55.9 N IL NE 088-14-01.3 W 0002628962 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION Naperville 05/25/2006 17760.00000 41-44-11.7 N IL NE 088-11-12.2 W 0002628964 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION NAPERVILLE 05/25/2006 19320.00000 41-45-37.1 N IL NE 087-53-18.4 W 0002629052 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION LINCOLNSHIRE 05/25/2006 10835.00000 42-12-05.7 N IL NE 087-51-28.0 W 0002629053 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION NORTHBROOK 05/25/2006 10755.00000 42-05-45.0 N IL NE 087-50-10.0 W 0002629054 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION NORTHBROOK 05/25/2006 11245.00000 42-08-40.0 N IL NE 087-50-10.0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265666A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265666A1.txt
    • COMCAST OF ALABAMA, INC. E060108 SES-LIC-20060407-00594E Date Effective: 05/30/2006 Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Grant of Authority 05/30/2006 - 05/30/2021 Application for Authority Intelsat LLC Nature of Service:Fixed Satellite Service 39 � 35 ' 58.00 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 17625 Technology Boulevard, Washington, Hagerstown, MD 77 � 45 ' 22.00 " W LONG. LOCATION: Orbit Marine 1 1.3 meters ANTENNA ID: 7103-C Digital data 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 862KG7W Page 1 of 28 Digital data 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 1M72G7W 46.00 dBW Digital data 5925.0000 - 5965.0000 MHz 862KG7W 46.00 dBW Digital data 5925.0000 - 5965.0000 MHz 1M72G7W 46.00 dBW Digital data 6421.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 862KG7W 46.00 dBW Digital data 6421.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 1M72G7W Points of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265794A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265794A1.txt
    • WATER DEPARTMENAurora 06/02/2006 11225.00000 39-41-07.0 N CO NE 104-47-18.9 W 0002637817 CITY OF AURORA WATER DEPARTMENAurora 06/02/2006 11505.00000 39-41-07.0 N CO NE 102-32-56.0 W 0002638120 STATE OF COLORADO Cheyenne Wells 06/02/2006 06785.62500 38-47-45.0 N CO NE 102-32-56.0 W 0002638120 STATE OF COLORADO Cheyenne Wells 06/02/2006 06795.62500 38-47-45.0 N CO NE 102-17-26.0 W 0002638122 STATE OF COLORADO SHERIDAN LAKE 06/02/2006 06635.62500 38-29-01.3 N CO NE 105-01-28.0 W 0002638206 STATE OF COLORADO CHUCARA 06/02/2006 06785.62500 37-20-26.0 N CO NE 105-01-28.0 W 0002638206 STATE OF COLORADO CHUCARA 06/02/2006 06805.62500 37-20-26.0 N CO NE 104-28-58.7 W 0002638211 STATE OF COLORADO TRINIDAD 06/02/2006 06625.62500 37-00-03.4 N RP - Broadcast Auxiliary Remote Pickup State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265805A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265805A1.txt
    • OF SHERIFFS DEPT 458.62500000 Versailes 39-51-28.9 N IL 90-35-35.0 W 5 1 Page 6 Frequency Termination Pending Call Sign Termination Date Stn Class Licensee Name Lower/Upper Frequency City Latitude State Longitude Loc./ Path ## Ant. PW - Public Safety Pool, Conventional Public Safety & Critical Infrastructure Division 05/04/2006 WPUJ903 FX2 BROWN COUNTY OF SHERIFFS DEPT 453.62500000 Timewell 40-1-1.2 N IL 90-52-1.3 W 6 1 Call Sign Termination Date Stn Class Licensee Name Lower/Upper Frequency City Latitude State Longitude Loc./ Path ## Ant. YG - Industrial/Business Pool, Trunked Public Safety & Critical Infrastructure Division 05/02/2006 WQCQ510 MO RADIO ONE INC 463.22500000 -- -- 2 1 05/02/2006 WQCQ510 MO RADIO ONE INC 463.40000000 -- -- 2 1 05/02/2006 WQCQ510 MO RADIO ONE INC
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266205A1.pdf
    • Therefore, AT&T's concern about strategic manipulation of exogenous costs is misplaced. B. AT&T also contends that the Commission's approval of the exogenous rate increases in the LECs' 1996 tariffs was unlawful because it required an arbitrary and capricious waiver of the price cap rules. 12 For "good cause," the Commission may waive "[a]ny provision of the rules." 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. A waiver is permissible "where particular facts would make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest." Northeast Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). The Commission concluded that waivers were necessary to "permit[] the LECs to correct the errors arising solely from their compliance with the staff's legally deficient [RAO Letter 20] order." Order, 20
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266343A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266343A1.txt
    • LENA POINT 07/05/2006 10855.00000 58-23-27.8 N AK AM WBP70 134-46-06.4 W 0002627244 ALASCOM, INC. LENA POINT 07/05/2006 10895.00000 58-23-27.8 N AK AM WBP70 134-46-06.4 W 0002627244 ALASCOM, INC. LENA POINT 07/05/2006 10935.00000 58-23-27.8 N IL AM 088-06-50.1 W 0002628959 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION Naperville 07/07/2006 17820.00000 41-47-55.9 N IL AM 088-06-50.1 W 0002628959 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION Naperville 07/07/2006 17900.00000 41-47-55.9 N IL AM 088-14-01.3 W 0002628962 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION Naperville 07/07/2006 19320.00000 41-44-11.7 N IL AM 088-11-12.2 W 0002628964 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION NAPERVILLE 07/07/2006 17760.00000 41-45-37.1 N IL AM 088-11-12.2 W 0002628964 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION NAPERVILLE 07/07/2006 17820.00000 41-45-37.1 N IL AM 088-11-12.2 W 0002628964 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION NAPERVILLE 07/07/2006 18120.00000 41-45-37.1 N IL AM 088-03-42.9 W 0002629053 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION LAKE ZURICH 07/07/2006 11325.00000 42-09-53.4 N IL AM
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266394A8.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266394A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266394A8.txt
    • We believe all parties will benefit, especially the American consumer. For similar reasons, I also wholeheartedly support binding arbitration of the dispute between the Mid-Atlantic Sports Network and Comcast over carriage of the Washington Nationals games. Protracted negotiations and legal wrangling between the parties somehow have failed to produce televised coverage of 75 percent of this season's games for the 1.3 million Comcast subscribers in the Washington D.C. market. And, apparently, the MASN complaint has been left to rot in some lost crypt inside this building. Accordingly, the narrow arbitration remedy in the Order creates a private-sector solution to the dispute. This remedy also does not dictate a particular outcome, nor does it create a new legal standard for reviewing program
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266457A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266457A1.txt
    • CA NE 121-14-17.9 W 0002677675 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc Stockton 07/10/2006 00129.82500 37-53-39.0 N GM NE 089-47-42.2 W 0002677680 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc Gulf of Mexico 07/10/2006 00130.87500 28-39-07.8 N GM NE 092-40-44.5 W 0002677687 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc Gulf of Mexico 07/10/2006 00130.87500 29-22-22.8 N GM NE 096-57-00.9 W 0002677691 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc Gulf of Mexico 07/10/2006 00136.50000 26-01-01.3 N GM NE 090-32-14.3 W 0002677709 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc Gulf of Mexico 07/10/2006 00131.30000 29-11-25.8 N FL NE 081-45-33.8 W 0002677714 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc Ft Myers 07/10/2006 00136.85000 26-32-18.2 N GA NE 084-31-16.9 W 0002677716 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc Atlanta 07/10/2006 00129.70000 33-46-44.9 N CO NE 106-55-03.7 W 0002677719 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc Eagle 07/10/2006 00136.97500 39-38-33.2 N
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266513A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266513A1.pdf
    • R 112 0 R 115 0 R]/Type/Pages/Parent 144 0 R>> endobj 149 0 obj<> endobj 150 0 obj<>stream xmlns:pdf='http://ns.adobe.com/pdf/1.3/' pdf:Producer='Acrobat Distiller 6.0 (Windows)'> true.mmbpdfpc endstream endobj 151 0 obj<> endobj xref 0 152 0000000000 65535 f 0000005996 00000 n 0000006124 00000 n 0000006232 00000 n 0000007558 00000 n 0000007686 00000 n 0000007794
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266585A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266585A1.txt
    • NM MD WNTI395 104-14-34.8 W 0002685030 EL PASO NATURAL GAS COMPANY ROSWELL 07/17/2006 06655.62500 33-37-38.3 N NM MD WNTI395 104-14-34.8 W 0002685030 EL PASO NATURAL GAS COMPANY ROSWELL 07/17/2006 06663.75000 33-37-38.3 N SC MD WNTB427 081-16-29.0 W 0002687228 DUKE ENERGY CORP CLOVER 07/19/2006 00928.41875 35-07-47.0 N IA NE P 091-26-13.9 W 0002684120 CITY OF MOUNT VERNON MOUNT VERNON 07/17/2006 00956.34375 41-56-01.3 N PA NE P 078-31-33.6 W 0002684122 PIKE TOWNSHIP MUNICI[PAL AUTHORCURWENSVILLE 07/17/2006 00956.44375 40-58-27.5 N TX NE 099-22-06.1 W 0002684315 Enterprise Products Operating L.P. ENCINAL 07/17/2006 00932.34375 28-02-41.0 N TX NE 099-22-06.1 W 0002684315 Enterprise Products Operating L.P. ENCINAL 07/17/2006 00941.34375 28-02-41.0 N OR NE 121-19-05.2 W 0002684701 PacifiCorp Bend 07/17/2006 00934.37500 44-02-25.2 N Page 25 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266596A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266596A1.txt
    • 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Fixed Wireless 80.8 15.6 2.9 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Mobile Wireless 47.6 48.4 4.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Power Line and/or Other 1 48.1 22.8 9.7 6.2 5.0 3.9 2.5 1.1 0.5 0.1 0.1 ADSL and/or Cable Modem 13.5 27.0 21.6 14.3 8.7 5.9 4.1 2.7 1.3 0.6 0.3 All Technologies 1.0 5.6 11.9 14.8 13.5 10.3 7.8 5.7 4.6 4.0 20.7 Figures may not add up to 100% due to rounding. 1 Other includes high-speed lines provided over traditional wireline facilities such as T-carrier and also lines provided over any technology that is not specified in the table. Table 16 Percentage of Zip Codes with High-Speed
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266822A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266822A1.txt
    • 08/01/2006 00956.33125 38-40-19.9 N UT NE P 111-08-09.7 W 0002699206 OAKLEY CITY OAKLEY 08/01/2006 00956.25625 40-38-03.0 N OH NE 084-10-10.0 W 0002699219 Lima Memorial Hospital Lima 08/01/2006 19400.00000 40-44-46.1 N UT NE P 109-59-52.8 W 0002699220 JOHNSON WATER DISTRICT ROOSEVELT 08/01/2006 00956.35625 40-17-55.0 N OH NE 084-05-09.4 W 0002699221 Lima Memorial Hospital Lima 08/01/2006 17840.00000 40-44-09.0 N MN NE P 093-43-01.3 W 0002699225 CITY OF MOUND MOUND 08/01/2006 00956.44375 45-08-43.0 N UT NE 112-03-08.0 W 0002699483 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANYMAGNA 08/01/2006 00928.75625 40-37-37.0 N UT NE 112-03-08.0 W 0002699483 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANYMAGNA 08/01/2006 00952.75625 40-37-37.0 N IL NE 089-39-15.3 W 0002699516 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANYPIONEER 08/01/2006 00928.58125 40-47-03.1 N IL NE 089-39-15.3 W 0002699516 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANYPIONEER 08/01/2006 00952.58125
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
    • Rates for Low-Income Households....................................................I-3 3. Business Rates............................................................................I-3 B. Standard Deviation Analysis of Residential Rates.......................................I-4 C. Toll Service Rates...........................................................................I-4 D. Additional Sources of Information on Local and Toll Rates..........................I-5 Table 1.1 Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas (As of October 15, 2005) Table 1.2 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas (As of October 15), 1986-2005 Table 1.3 Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities (As of October 15, 2005) Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities (As of October 15), 1993-2005 Table 1.5 Connection Charges for a Residential Telephone Line in the Sample Cities (As of October 15), 1993-2005 Table 1.6 Comparison of Standard Local Rates to Lifeline and Link-Up Rates (As of October
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266914A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266914A1.txt
    • N OH MD WQBJ203 081-23-09.2 W 0002706827 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION BAINBRIDGE TWP. 08/08/2006 11405.00000 41-25-13.6 N OH MD WQBJ203 081-23-09.2 W 0002706827 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION BAINBRIDGE TWP. 08/08/2006 17760.00000 41-25-13.6 N OH MD WQBJ203 081-23-09.2 W 0002706827 FIBERTOWER CORPORATION BAINBRIDGE TWP. 08/08/2006 17820.00000 41-25-13.6 N OK MD WMT715 095-30-22.8 W 0002707654 CROSS VALIANT CELLULAR PARTNERHUGO 08/09/2006 05945.00000 33-59-47.3 N NC MD WPSY491 078-55-01.3 W 0002707656 USCOC of North Carolina RSA #7, Inc. Lumberton 08/09/2006 06745.00000 34-36-33.3 N Page 18 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NC MD WPSY491 078-55-01.3 W 0002707656 USCOC of North Carolina RSA #7, Inc. Lumberton 08/09/2006 06795.00000 34-36-33.3 N
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266998A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266998A1.txt
    • BPSK modulation; Rate 1/2 FEC; 0.7 Mbps RF transmission rate; CDMA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 1M00G7D SITE ID: REMOTE1 VSAT 0.26M. (100 UNITS) CDMA TERMINAL, STATEWIDE, AZ LOCATION: MICA-TECH LDR-FA3 0.26 meters ANTENNA ID: 508009B Page 1 of 27 32.00 dBW Up to 9.6 kbps; Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum; 1020 Chips/symbol; Up to 2 MegaChips/symbol; BPSK modulation; Rate 1/2 FEC; 1.3 Mbps RF transmission rate; CDMA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 1M00G7D NULL 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 1M00G7D SITE ID: REMOTE2 VSAT 0.52M. (100 UNITS) CDMA TERMINAL, STATEWIDE, AZ LOCATION: MICA-TECH LDR-FA2 0.52 meters ANTENNA ID: 508018B 39.00 dBW Up to 9.6 kbps; Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum; 1020 Chips/symbol; Up to 2 MegaChips/symbol; BPSK modulation; Rate 1/2 FEC; 1.3 Mbps RF transmission
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267225A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267225A1.txt
    • Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA NE 121-56-41.0 W 0002732194 Nextweb Inc San Jose 08/31/2006 22620.00000 37-25-07.0 N CA NE 121-55-07.0 W 0002732217 Nextweb Inc Milpitas 08/31/2006 21320.00000 37-27-24.0 N TX NE 100-55-35.0 W 0002732948 MAY & SCOFIELD LLC DEL RIO 08/31/2006 21252.00000 29-21-43.0 N KS NE 094-51-42.9 W 0002733042 WESTAR ENERGY SHAWNEE 08/31/2006 10715.00000 38-58-21.7 N MT NE 111-03-01.3 W 0002733147 KXLF Communications, Inc. Bozeman 09/01/2006 21255.00000 45-39-30.5 N KY NE 082-16-45.6 W 0002733242 Kentucky Power Company dba American Mouthcard 09/01/2006 06393.05400 37-23-47.1 N IL NE P 088-31-22.8 W 0002733244 FOX RIVER WRD ELBURN 08/28/2006 00952.55625 41-48-41.7 N IN NE P 085-40-02.0 W 0002733255 WATSON WATER COMPANY INC CHARLESTOWN 08/28/2006 00956.26875 38-25-41.0 N IN NE P 085-40-02.0 W 0002733255
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267393A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267393A1.txt
    • HOLDINGS 4, INC STUART 09/05/2006 00862.56250 34-56-48.0 N NE A 0002736167 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 4, INC 09/05/2006 00806.00000 - 00821.00000 OK NE 095-46-23.9 W 0002736167 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 4, INC MCALESTER 09/05/2006 00862.56250 34-58-07.3 N NE A 0002736168 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 4, INC 09/05/2006 00806.00000 - 00821.00000 KS NE 101-54-31.3 W 0002736168 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 4, INC ELKHART 09/05/2006 00862.61250 37-00-01.3 N RO WNNH835 0002736410 COMMUNICATIONS CENTER INC 09/06/2006 RO WNMJ534 0002737005 NORTH SIGHT COMMUNICATIONS, INC 09/06/2006 RO WNDV636 0002744814 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS OF THE M 09/08/2006 RO WNHA467 0002744815 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS OF THE M 09/08/2006 RO WNIX434 0002744816 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS OF THE M 09/08/2006 RO WNNS425 0002744817 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS OF THE M 09/08/2006 RO WNPS531 0002744818 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS OF THE M
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267621A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267621A1.txt
    • Mbps RF transmission rate; CDMA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 1M00G7D NULL 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 1M00G7D SITE ID: REMOTE1 VSAT 0.26M. (100 UNITS) CDMA TERMINAL, STATEWIDE, AZ LOCATION: Page 1 of 12 MICA-TECH LDR-FA3 0.26 meters ANTENNA ID: 508009B 15.00 dBW Up to 9.6 kbps; Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum; 1020 Chips/symbol; Up to 2 MegaChips/symbol; BPSK modulation; Rate 1/2 FEC; 1.3 Mbps RF transmission rate; CDMA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 1M00G7D NULL 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 1M00G7D SITE ID: REMOTE2 VSAT 0.52M. (100 UNITS) CDMA TERMINAL, STATEWIDE, AZ LOCATION: MICA-TECH LDR-FA2 0.52 meters ANTENNA ID: 508018B 25.00 dBW Up to 9.6 kbps; Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum; 1020 Chips/symbol; Up to 2 MegaChips/symbol; BPSK modulation; Rate 1/2 FEC; 1.3 Mbps RF transmission
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267749A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267749A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267749A1.txt
    • Americans can use the public airwaves to contribute to our national experience. Women make up over half of the U.S. population, but yet they own less than 5 percent of all television stations. Racial and ethnic minorities make up over 30 percent of the population, but yet they own less than 3.3 percent of all television stations. African Americans own 1.3 percent; Latino Americans own 1.1 percent, and Asians and American Indians only own 0.44 and 0.37 percent, respectively, of all television stations. Despite these abysmal minority and women ownership numbers, the Commission didn't even acknowledge the disappointing state of minority ownership in its 2003 media ownership decision. To make matters worse, it repealed the only policy specifically aimed at fostering
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267827A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267827A1.txt
    • County Office of Education Camarillo 10/03/2006 17800.00000 34-19-52.0 N CA MD WQEP361 118-46-57.0 W 0002771655 Ventura County Office of Education Simi Valley 10/03/2006 19360.00000 34-16-44.0 N CT MD WNEO395 072-41-41.7 W 0002775493 NORTH CENTRAL CT EMS COUNCIL INHARTFORD 10/05/2006 00933.37500 41-47-47.3 N CT MD WNEO395 072-41-41.7 W 0002775493 NORTH CENTRAL CT EMS COUNCIL INHARTFORD 10/05/2006 00958.35000 41-47-47.3 N OH NE 082-08-01.3 W 0002607391 LORAIN CITY OF LORAIN 05/10/2006 00941.53750 41-28-48.2 N Page 5 Land Mobile Control Station Meeting the 6.1m Rule Box/Rectangular KMRA around a centerpoint KMRA around a site (listed on application) Area of Operation Key: Modification Amendment Purpose Key: AM MD A P X R C Countywide S Statewide N Nationwide including HI,AK,US Territories T Citywide O Other -
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267917A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267917A1.txt
    • 089-40-37.4 W 0002777376 Cellco Partnership Bartonville 10/06/2006 06315.84000 40-35-36.1 N IL MD WLU891 089-40-37.4 W 0002777376 Cellco Partnership Bartonville 10/06/2006 06345.49000 40-35-36.1 N IL MD WLU891 089-40-37.4 W 0002777376 Cellco Partnership Bartonville 10/06/2006 10652.50000 40-35-36.1 N NM MD WPYH529 106-39-03.1 W 0002777978 AT&T CORP. ALBUQUERQUE 10/10/2006 17850.00000 35-05-06.2 N NM MD WPYH530 106-43-13.9 W 0002777979 AT&T CORP. ALBUQUERQUE 10/10/2006 19410.00000 35-05-01.3 N OH MD WLV910 081-37-18.5 W 0002778109 New Par Garfield Ht. 10/10/2006 06770.00000 41-25-06.2 N NC MD WPRU733 082-54-24.4 W 0002778118 BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, Clyde 10/10/2006 06550.00000 35-34-06.3 N AZ MD KPN87 110-47-12.4 W 0002778162 Qwest Corporation GLOBE 10/10/2006 10735.00000 33-23-48.2 N AZ MD KPN87 110-47-12.4 W 0002778162 Qwest Corporation GLOBE 10/10/2006 10775.00000 33-23-48.2 N AZ MD KPN87 110-47-12.4 W 0002778162
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268047A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268047A1.txt
    • Corp. Lorton 10/16/2006 11325.00000 38-42-35.2 N VA NE 077-09-25.9 W 0002786782 FiberTower Network Services Corp. Lorton 10/16/2006 11405.00000 38-42-35.2 N VA NE 077-28-35.5 W 0002786783 FiberTower Network Services Corp. Nokesville 10/16/2006 11325.00000 38-41-22.0 N VA NE 077-28-35.5 W 0002786783 FiberTower Network Services Corp. Nokesville 10/16/2006 11405.00000 38-41-22.0 N VA NE 077-26-33.2 W 0002786784 FiberTower Network Services Corp. INDEPENDENTHILL 10/16/2006 23175.00000 38-39-01.3 N VA NE 077-11-14.1 W 0002786785 FiberTower Network Services Corp. NEWINGTON 10/16/2006 10755.00000 38-44-04.4 N VA NE 077-09-34.9 W 0002786786 FiberTower Network Services Corp. Alexandria 10/16/2006 11325.00000 38-44-34.8 N VA NE 077-13-01.0 W 0002786787 FiberTower Network Services Corp. LORTON 10/16/2006 10835.00000 38-41-17.0 N VA NE 077-13-01.0 W 0002786787 FiberTower Network Services Corp. LORTON 10/16/2006 23025.00000 38-41-17.0 N VA NE 077-32-55.0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268284A1.txt
    • Up to 1 MegaChips/symbol; BPSK modulation; Rate 1/2 FEC; 0.7 Mbps RF transmission rate; CDMA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 1M00G7D SITE ID: REMOTE1 VSAT 0.26M. (100 UNITS) CDMA TERMINAL, STATEWIDE, AZ LOCATION: MICA-TECH LDR-FA3 0.26 meters ANTENNA ID: 508009B 15.00 dBW Up to 9.6 kbps; Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum; 1020 Chips/symbol; Up to 2 MegaChips/symbol; BPSK modulation; Rate 1/2 FEC; 1.3 Mbps RF transmission rate; CDMA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 1M00G7D Page 1 of 17 NULL 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 1M00G7D SITE ID: REMOTE2 VSAT 0.52M. (100 UNITS) CDMA TERMINAL, STATEWIDE, AZ LOCATION: MICA-TECH LDR-FA2 0.52 meters ANTENNA ID: 508018B 25.00 dBW Up to 9.6 kbps; Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum; 1020 Chips/symbol; Up to 2 MegaChips/symbol; BPSK modulation; Rate 1/2 FEC;
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268453A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268453A1.txt
    • to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City WV NE 080-09-18.4 W 0002812106 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC Hodgesville 11/08/2006 11215.00000 39-03-23.8 N WV NE 080-09-18.4 W 0002812106 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC Hodgesville 11/08/2006 21925.00000 39-03-23.8 N WV NE 080-10-03.7 W 0002812131 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC Buckhannon 11/08/2006 23075.00000 38-58-01.3 N WV NE 080-11-22.4 W 0002812182 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC Buckhannon 11/08/2006 23025.00000 38-55-29.2 N WV NE 080-13-27.0 W 0002812268 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC Buckhannon 11/08/2006 23025.00000 38-59-16.4 N WV NE 080-13-27.0 W 0002812268 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC Buckhannon 11/08/2006 23175.00000 38-59-16.4 N WV NE 080-13-31.0 W 0002812304 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC Buckhannon 11/08/2006 21975.00000 38-59-11.3 N WV NE 080-13-53.3
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268576A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268576A1.txt
    • Applicant Name Latitude City MN NE 096-46-32.9 W 0002815097 CASS COUNTY ELECTRIC COOPERATIOAKPORT 11/13/2006 10618.75000 46-56-23.1 N ND NE 096-48-16.1 W 0002815101 CASS COUNTY ELECTRIC COOPERATIFARGO 11/13/2006 10638.75000 46-53-50.1 N ND NE 096-50-16.0 W 0002815105 CASS COUNTY ELECTRIC COOPERATIHickson 11/13/2006 10628.75000 46-44-20.4 N KY NE P 082-56-07.1 W 0002816167 CITY OF GRAYSON UTILITIES COMMISGRAYSON 11/13/2006 00956.26875 38-19-44.8 N ND NE 096-47-01.3 W 0002817310 CASS COUNTY ELECTRIC COOPERATIFARGO 11/14/2006 10553.75000 46-52-22.5 N ND NE 096-47-01.3 W 0002817310 CASS COUNTY ELECTRIC COOPERATIFARGO 11/14/2006 10563.75000 46-52-22.5 N ND NE 096-47-01.3 W 0002817310 CASS COUNTY ELECTRIC COOPERATIFARGO 11/14/2006 10573.75000 46-52-22.5 N NY NE 073-38-09.1 W 0002817437 New York Power Authority Purdys Mills 11/14/2006 06795.00000 44-50-37.3 N NY NE 073-38-09.1 W 0002817437 New York Power Authority
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269058A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269058A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269058A1.txt
    • 0 g )>> endobj 422 0 obj<> endobj 423 0 obj<> endobj 424 0 obj<> endobj 425 0 obj<>stream xmlns:pdf='http://ns.adobe.com/pdf/1.3/' pdf:Producer='Acrobat Distiller 6.0 (Windows)'> 2 _ endstream endobj xref 0 429 0000000031 65535 f 0000002789 00000 n 0000003078 00000 n 0000003198 00000 n 0000003318
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269066A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269066A1.txt
    • 12/13/2006 10588.12500 41-01-43.7 N UT NE 109-18-34.1 W 0002848637 Questar InfoComm Incorporated Jensen 12/14/2006 06595.00000 40-11-58.1 N TN NE 084-21-16.3 W 0002848880 TENNESSEE RSA NO. 3 LIMITED PARTOliver Springs 12/14/2006 06795.00000 36-03-02.7 N TN NE 084-33-08.3 W 0002849030 TENNESSEE RSA NO. 3 LIMITED PARTHelenwood 12/14/2006 10552.50000 36-26-08.4 N MD NE 077-05-44.2 W 0002849169 airBand Communications, Inc. Bethesda, MD 12/14/2006 22670.00000 38-59-01.3 N MD NE 077-01-39.1 W 0002849171 airBand Communications, Inc. Silver Spring, MD 12/14/2006 21470.00000 38-59-37.2 N Page 16 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NC NE 078-38-24.0 W 0002849173 airBand Communications, Inc. Raleigh, NC 12/14/2006 23070.00000 35-46-27.4 N NC NE
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269191A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269191A1.txt
    • N WY MD WLT752 110-30-16.6 W 0002856729 Union Telephone Company KEMMERER 12/21/2006 06197.24000 41-50-17.8 N WY MD WLT752 110-30-16.6 W 0002856729 Union Telephone Company KEMMERER 12/21/2006 11622.50000 41-50-17.8 N WY MD KPS39 110-19-11.6 W 0002856739 Union Telephone Company LABARGE 12/21/2006 05945.20000 42-19-30.8 N WY MD WMK668 110-19-11.5 W 0002856748 Union Telephone Company CALPET 12/21/2006 10557.50000 42-19-31.8 N CA MD WQAZ474 118-15-01.3 W 0002856916 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNELANCASTER 12/21/2006 11405.00000 34-46-34.7 N CA MD WLT475 118-08-42.3 W 0002856980 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNEPALMDALE 12/21/2006 10915.00000 34-31-47.0 N AK MD WGX538 150-07-02.1 W 0002858296 Matanuska Telephone Association Inc. TALKEETNA 12/21/2006 02115.20000 62-19-17.2 N AK MD WGX538 150-07-02.1 W 0002858296 Matanuska Telephone Association Inc. TALKEETNA 12/21/2006 02128.00000 62-19-17.2 N AK MD WGX538 150-07-02.1
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
    • Subscribership - Household - United States ........................................................... Table 6.1 5 Index of Tables and Charts Switch Downtime and Trunk Blocking ................................................................... Table 9.2 Switch Downtime Causes ....................................................................................... Table 9.3 Switching Systems .................................................................................................. Table 10.1 Taxes ................................................................................................................ Table 11.11 Telecommunications Industry Revenues by Service ............................................. Table 1.2 Telecommunications Industry Revenues - Total ...................................................Table 1.1 Telecommunications Revenues by Type of Carrier ..............................................Table 1.3 Telecommunications Revenues - Interstate ........................................................ Table 1.16 Telecommunications Revenues - Intrastate ........................................................ Table 1.15 Telecommunications Revenues - Total - by State ................................................. Table 1.13 Telecommunications Revenues - 2002................................... ................... Table 1.14 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs ...........................Table 8.3 Transmission Systems ............................................................................................. Table 10.2 Universal Service Program Requirements and Contribution Factors ..................... Table 1.10 Universal Service Support
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A11.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A11.txt
    • 3.4 4.3 5.7 3.7 3.6 5.2 3.7 12.1 LOCAL SERVICES PROVIDED TO RESIDENTIAL AND BUSINESS CUSTOMERS Percent Installation Commitments Met 97.4 99.5 98.5 99.1 99.1 99.6 99.1 98.5 97.7 Residence 98.7 99.6 98.6 99.2 99.1 99.6 99.1 98.7 98.0 Business 88.5 98.9 98.5 98.3 98.8 99.3 98.5 97.0 94.7 Average Installation Interval (days) 1.7 0.3 1.4 1.6 2.2 1.5 0.8 1.3 0.9 Residence 1.3 0.3 1.4 1.5 2.1 1.0 0.7 1.2 0.8 Business 2.0 0.7 1.3 2.2 2.4 3.8 1.2 2.0 2.3 Average Out of Service Repair Interval (hours) 42.2 18.2 15.9 43.4 23.5 29.7 29.0 34.1 26.0 Residence 44.8 18.8 16.3 45.3 24.5 30.6 31.1 37.8 28.4 Business 29.2 16.0 13.6 33.9 17.3 23.6 20.7 15.2 12.9 Initial Trouble Reports
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A2.txt
    • Subscribership - Household - United States ........................................................... Table 6.1 5 Index of Tables and Charts Switch Downtime and Trunk Blocking ................................................................... Table 9.2 Switch Downtime Causes ....................................................................................... Table 9.3 Switching Systems .................................................................................................. Table 10.1 Taxes ................................................................................................................ Table 11.11 Telecommunications Industry Revenues by Service ............................................. Table 1.2 Telecommunications Industry Revenues - Total ...................................................Table 1.1 Telecommunications Revenues by Type of Carrier ..............................................Table 1.3 Telecommunications Revenues - Interstate ........................................................ Table 1.16 Telecommunications Revenues - Intrastate ........................................................ Table 1.15 Telecommunications Revenues - Total - by State ................................................. Table 1.13 Telecommunications Revenues - 2002................................... ................... Table 1.14 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs ...........................Table 8.3 Transmission Systems ............................................................................................. Table 10.2 Universal Service Program Requirements and Contribution Factors ..................... Table 1.10 Universal Service Support
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A3.txt
    • corrections have been made based on supplemental filer information or as a result of audits. Nonetheless, disaggregated data are likely to be less accurate than industry totals. Table 1.1 shows the major components of telecommunications revenues for 1997 through 2005. This table was created by simply aggregating the revenues in the major classifications designated on Form 499-A. Tables 1.2 and 1.3 provide a look at annual industry revenues over time. Generally, Form 499-A revenue data can be tabulated in two distinct ways: by type of service provided and by type of business. Table 1.2 categorizes revenues by type of service and shows, for example, that carriers reported $96.5 billion in wireless service revenues for 2004. This total includes wireless service revenues
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A8.txt
    • Bureau, American Community Survey. 2002 2001 Table 6.4 Telephone Penetration by State (Percentage of Housing Units with Telephone Service) 2004 2003 6 - 14 Table 6.5 Telephone Penetration by State (Annual Average Percentage of Households with Telephone Service) State 1984 2005 Change Alabama 88.4% 91.6% 3.2% * Alaska 86.5 95.2 8.7 * Arizona 86.9 92.9 6.0 * Arkansas 86.6 87.9 1.3 California 92.5 95.4 3.0 * Colorado 93.2 95.1 1.8 * Connecticut 95.5 93.9 -1.6 # Delaware 94.3 91.5 -2.7 # District of Columbia 94.9 92.2 -2.7 # Florida 88.7 91.8 3.1 * Georgia 86.2 89.8 3.6 * Hawaii 93.5 94.8 1.3 Idaho 90.7 94.8 4.1 * Illinois 94.2 89.6 -4.6 # Indiana 91.6 90.8 -0.8 Iowa 96.2 95.4 -0.8 Kansas
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
    • 1982 - 1984 = 100 0.0 50.0 100.0 150.0 200.0 250.0 19241929193419391944194919541959196419691974197919841989199419992004 CPI All Items CPI Telephone Services 7 - 6 1978 7.3% 9.0% 0.9% 1979 8.7 13.3 0.7 1980 9.7 12.5 4.6 1981 8.3 8.9 11.7 1982 5.2 3.8 7.2 1983 3.4 3.8 3.6 1984 3.6 3.9 9.2 1985 2.8 3.8 4.7 1986 2.3 1.1 2.7 1987 2.9 4.4 -1.3 1988 3.7 4.4 1.3 1989 3.5 4.6 -0.3 1990 4.1 6.1 -0.4 1991 3.1 3.1 3.5 1992 2.1 2.9 -0.3 1993 2.3 2.7 1.8 1994 2.2 2.7 0.7 1995 2.0 2.5 1.2 1996 1.9 3.3 2.1 1997 1.5 1.7 0.2 1998 1.1 1.6 0.3* 1999 1.5 2.7 0.4 2000 2.3 3.4 -2.3 2001 2.5 1.6 1.3 2002 1.5 2.4 0.2
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269297A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269297A1.txt
    • Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City DE MD WMU249 075-31-24.0 W 0002863496 NM LICENSING LLC WILMINGTON 12/28/2006 00944.25000 39-50-03.0 N AR MD WMF400 094-06-06.0 W 0002864114 CAPSTAR TX LIMITED PARTNERSHIPSPRINGDALE 12/29/2006 00950.50000 36-12-15.0 N AR MD WMF400 094-06-06.0 W 0002864114 CAPSTAR TX LIMITED PARTNERSHIPSPRINGDALE 12/29/2006 00950.75000 36-12-15.0 N MA NE 072-35-32.3 W 0002864179 SAGA COMMUNICATIONS OF NEW ENGDeerfield 12/29/2006 00947.50000 42-32-01.3 N AS - Aural Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OK MD WLO394 097-08-35.0 W 0002861131 NM LICENSING LLC ARDMORE 12/26/2006 00944.50000 34-11-46.0 N IL MD WLP358 088-57-14.9 W 0002861342 CONNOISSEUR MEDIA OF BLOOMINGTNORMAL 12/26/2006 00950.00000 40-30-40.2 N CO MD WGR736 105-05-57.0 W 0002862140 EDUCATIONAL MEDIA
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269393A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269393A1.txt
    • NE 082-29-44.0 W 0002867778 FiberTower Network Services Corp. Sarasota 01/03/2007 10835.00000 27-19-27.0 N FL NE 081-57-21.0 W 0002867779 FiberTower Network Services Corp. Cape Coral 01/03/2007 11245.00000 26-39-34.0 N FL NE 081-57-21.0 W 0002867779 FiberTower Network Services Corp. Cape Coral 01/03/2007 11285.00000 26-39-34.0 N FL NE 081-57-21.0 W 0002867779 FiberTower Network Services Corp. Cape Coral 01/03/2007 11325.00000 26-39-34.0 N FL NE 081-57-01.3 W 0002867780 FiberTower Network Services Corp. CAPE CORAL 01/03/2007 10835.00000 26-38-03.3 N FL NE 081-51-39.7 W 0002867781 FiberTower Network Services Corp. FORT MYERS 01/03/2007 11405.00000 26-37-52.0 N FL NE 081-51-39.7 W 0002867781 FiberTower Network Services Corp. FORT MYERS 01/03/2007 11445.00000 26-37-52.0 N FL NE 082-22-18.2 W 0002867782 FiberTower Network Services Corp. Tampa 01/03/2007 21925.00000 28-07-11.3 N FL NE 082-32-05.0 W
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269446A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269446A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269446A1.txt
    • and VOD. The Bureau determined that the set-top box at issue is not the type of low-cost, limited capability box envisioned by the Commission in its 2005 Order. The Bureau did find, however, that Bend's plan to migrate to an all-digital network, if accomplished by 2008 (the timeframe set forth in Bend's waiver request) justifies a waiver pursuant to Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's rules. Thus, the Bureau granted Bend a waiver conditioned upon Bend's migration to an all-digital network by 2008 and upon Bend meeting certain milestones related to that migration. In addition, the Bureau noted the difficulties that small cable operators may face in complying with the July 1, 2007 deadline for separated security because manufacturers prioritize
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269507A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269507A1.txt
    • to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City VA AM 076-14-41.2 W 0002794545 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Norfolk 01/08/2007 21730.00000 36-55-44.9 N VA AM 076-11-29.0 W 0002794973 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Norfolk 01/08/2007 19310.00000 36-55-09.1 N WV AM 080-10-03.7 W 0002812131 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC Buckhannon 01/08/2007 23075.00000 38-58-01.3 N WV AM 080-10-03.7 W 0002812131 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC Buckhannon 01/09/2007 23075.00000 38-58-01.3 N WV AM 080-13-53.3 W 0002812326 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC Buckhannon 01/11/2007 23025.00000 38-58-15.2 N WV AM 080-13-53.3 W 0002812326 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC Buckhannon 01/11/2007 23125.00000 38-58-15.2 N WV AM 080-19-38.0 W 0002812472 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC ROCK CAVE 01/11/2007 11285.00000 38-51-01.0 N WV AM
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269514A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269514A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269514A1.txt
    • numbering resource utilization statistics based on December 2005 data that carriers submitted to the North American Numbering Plan Administrator (NANPA), as well as other information. Tracking number utilization is one of a number of initiatives taken by the Commission to ensure that limited numbering resources are used efficiently. Summary Data Utilization Statistics by Carrier Type - Reporting carriers have over 1.3 billion telephone numbers. Of these, nearly 582 million were assigned to customers, about 669 million were available to be assigned, and about 91 million were used for other purposes, such as for administrative use. Following are utilization statistics by carrier type as of December 31, 2005: Overall, 43.4% of all telephone numbers were assigned to customers. The overall utilization rate
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269691A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269691A1.txt
    • Broadband Lexington 01/18/2007 17840.00000 35-44-21.7 N NC NE 080-13-17.5 W 0002883223 Conterra Ultra Broadband Lexington 01/18/2007 23125.00000 35-44-21.7 N NC NE 080-08-01.9 W 0002883229 Conterra Ultra Broadband Thomasville 01/18/2007 18000.00000 35-52-44.3 N NC NE 080-10-56.2 W 0002883265 Conterra Ultra Broadband Lexington 01/18/2007 17760.00000 35-51-56.0 N NC NE 080-09-44.9 W 0002883273 Conterra Ultra Broadband Lexington 01/18/2007 21975.00000 35-48-32.8 N NC NE 080-12-01.3 W 0002883345 Conterra Ultra Broadband Lexington 01/18/2007 21825.00000 35-48-52.0 N NC NE 080-16-06.9 W 0002883581 Conterra Ultra Broadband Lexington 01/18/2007 21925.00000 35-43-57.5 N NC NE 080-06-15.6 W 0002883614 Conterra Ultra Broadband Denton 01/18/2007 19480.00000 35-40-24.8 N NC NE 080-06-15.6 W 0002883614 Conterra Ultra Broadband Denton 01/18/2007 23075.00000 35-40-24.8 N NC NE 080-07-07.3 W 0002883623 Conterra Ultra Broadband Denton 01/18/2007 21875.00000
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270046A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270046A1.txt
    • W 0002886511 MOBILCOM PITTSBURG, INC. BRISTOW 01/22/2007 00152.48000 35-51-28.0 N OK NE 094-55-17.8 W 0002886511 MOBILCOM PITTSBURG, INC. LEACH 01/22/2007 00152.48000 36-13-46.3 N AR NE 094-05-28.0 W 0002886511 MOBILCOM PITTSBURG, INC. SPRINGDALE 01/22/2007 00152.48000 36-10-58.0 N OK NE 095-55-24.0 W 0002886511 MOBILCOM PITTSBURG, INC. TULSA 01/22/2007 00152.48000 36-03-59.3 N OK NE 095-59-26.0 W 0002886511 MOBILCOM PITTSBURG, INC. TULSA 01/22/2007 00152.48000 36-09-01.3 N RO WPGC585 0002885255 MOUNTAIN COMMUNICATIONS & ELEC 01/22/2007 RO WPKF962 0002885256 MOUNTAIN COMMUNICATIONS & ELEC 01/22/2007 RO WNIF668 0002885537 GEM ELECTRONICS OF MONMOUTH IN 01/22/2007 RO WNQS201 0002885569 Metrocall USA, Inc 01/22/2007 RO WNYI239 0002885654 Metrocall USA, Inc 01/22/2007 Page 21 IK - Industrial/Business Pool - Commercial, Conventional State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270198A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270198A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270198A1.txt
    • 0 444]>> endobj 26 0 obj<> endobj 27 0 obj<> endobj 28 0 obj<> endobj 29 0 obj<>stream xmlns:pdf='http://ns.adobe.com/pdf/1.3/' pdf:Producer='Acrobat Distiller 6.0 (Windows)'> Microsoft Word - DTT Senate opening statement Final.docAaro n.Goldberger endstream endobj 30 0 obj<> endobj xref 0 31 0000000000 65535 f 0000002409 00000
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270199A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270199A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270199A1.txt
    • 0 g )>> endobj 117 0 obj<> endobj 118 0 obj<> endobj 119 0 obj<> endobj 120 0 obj<>stream xmlns:pdf='http://ns.adobe.com/pdf/1.3/' pdf:Producer='Acrobat Distiller 6.0 (Windows)'> 10 STATEMENT John Hunter endstream endobj xref 0 124 0000000015 65535 f 0000001457 00000 n 0000001689 00000 n 0000004971
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270308A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270308A1.txt
    • 31-05-46.0 N NY MD WQCD553 074-25-28.5 W 0002899842 WRNN LICENSE COMPANY, LLC WURTSBORO 02/02/2007 07112.50000 41-36-46.8 N PR NE 066-33-15.0 W 0002892595 CMCG PUERTO RICO LICENSE LLC JAYUYA 01/26/2007 06875.00000 - 06900.00000 18-09-10.0 N Page 31 TI - TV Intercity Relay State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City FL NE 082-11-01.3 W 0002894167 FOX TELEVISION STATIONS, INC. Ocala 01/29/2007 06937.50000 29-10-28.9 N TX NE 097-20-30.0 W 0002894530 CHANNEL 6, INC. TEMPLE 01/29/2007 02025.00000 - 02025.50000 31-05-46.0 N TX NE 097-20-30.0 W 0002894530 CHANNEL 6, INC. TEMPLE 01/29/2007 02025.50000 - 02109.50000 31-05-46.0 N TX NE 097-20-30.0 W 0002894530 CHANNEL 6, INC. TEMPLE 01/29/2007 02109.50000 - 02110.00000 31-05-46.0 N TX NE 097-20-30.0 W
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
    • purchased by calling Best Copy and Printing, Inc., Portals II, 445 12th Street S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington DC 20554 at 800-378-3160, facsimile 202-488-5563, or via e-mail fcc@bcpiweb.com. The report can also be downloaded from the Wireline Competition Bureau Statistical Reports Internet site at: www.fcc.gov/wcb/iatd/trends.html. Table of Contents 1-1 1-1 Table 1.1Interstate Per-Line Access Charges...............................................................1-3 Table 1.2Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges............................................................1-4 Table 1.3Interstate Per-Line Access Charges by Carrier...................................................1-5 Table 1.4Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges by Carrier.................................... ......... 1-6 2-1 Table 2.1High-Speed Lines....................................................................................2-3 Chart 2.1Total High-Speed Lines..............................................................................2-3 Chart 2.2High-Speed Lines by Technology..................................................................2-3 Table 2.2Advance Services Lines........................................................................... 2-4 Chart 2.3Advance Services Lines........................................................................... 2-4 Chart 2.4Advance Services Lines by Technology.........................................................2-4 Table 2.3Residential High-Speed Lines.....................................................................2-5 Chart 2.5Residential High-Speed Lines.....................................................................2-5 Chart 2.6Residential High-Speed Lines by Technology...................................................2-5 Table 2.4Residential Advanced
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270500A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270500A1.txt
    • 39-39-06.3 N NV AM WMM888 119-27-50.9 W 0002866492 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS SERVICESWADSWORTH 02/08/2007 06765.00000 39-39-06.3 N NV AM WMN402 119-29-25.0 W 0002866497 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS SERVICESDAYTON 02/09/2007 02118.40000 39-11-49.4 N NV AM WMN402 119-29-25.0 W 0002866497 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS SERVICESDAYTON 02/09/2007 06728.75000 39-11-49.4 N NV AM WMN402 119-29-25.0 W 0002866497 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS SERVICESDAYTON 02/09/2007 06755.00000 39-11-49.4 N FL AM 081-57-01.3 W 0002867780 FiberTower Network Services Corp. CAPE CORAL 02/05/2007 10835.00000 26-38-03.3 N OR AM 124-14-04.6 W 0002876879 Edge Wireless Licenses, LLC Brookings 02/08/2007 06605.62500 42-02-42.7 N OR AM 124-14-04.6 W 0002876879 Edge Wireless Licenses, LLC Brookings 02/08/2007 11622.50000 42-02-42.7 N PR AM WQET454 066-10-34.9 W 0002881299 SPRINTCOM, INC. (PUERTO RICO) BAYAMON 02/08/2007 11132.50000 18-21-09.5 N PR AM WQET454 066-10-34.9 W
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270670A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270670A1.txt
    • 46-44-20.4 N OR NE 123-39-10.8 W 0002910679 Tillamook County Emergency CommunicaTillamook 02/12/2007 10755.00000 45-31-25.3 N OR NE 123-56-28.0 W 0002910688 Tillamook County Emergency CommunicaMANZANITA 02/12/2007 06595.00000 45-44-39.0 N FL NE 080-06-39.1 W 0002910775 Boca Raton, City of Boca Raton 02/12/2007 00928.65625 26-22-03.2 N FL NE 080-06-39.1 W 0002910775 Boca Raton, City of Boca Raton 02/12/2007 00952.65625 26-22-03.2 N ND NE 096-47-01.3 W 0002910802 CASS, COUNTY OF FARGO 02/12/2007 10553.75000 46-52-22.5 N ND NE 096-47-01.3 W 0002910802 CASS, COUNTY OF FARGO 02/12/2007 10563.75000 46-52-22.5 N ND NE 096-47-01.3 W 0002910802 CASS, COUNTY OF FARGO 02/12/2007 10573.75000 46-52-22.5 N TX NE 098-28-48.0 W 0002911191 SAN ANTONIO WATER SYSTEMS SAN ANTONIO 02/13/2007 00928.75625 29-28-12.0 N TX NE 098-28-48.0 W 0002911191 SAN ANTONIO WATER SYSTEMS
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270855A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270855A1.txt
    • -- Residential Services (Using Company Provided Composites) Chart 4 Percent Residential Installation Commitments Met Large Price-Cap Carriers 97.0 97.5 98.0 98.5 99.0 99.5 100.0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Years Percent o f Co mmitments M et Weighted BOC/Sprint Composite* Weighted Verizon Avg. BellSouth Weighted AT&T Avg. Qwest 17 ARMIS 43-05 Report 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 BellSouth 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.3 Qwest 1.0 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 AT&T Ameritech 2.1 2.0 2.1 1.5 1.4 1.4 AT&T Pacific 1.8 1.3 1.2 1.5 1.6 1.5 AT&T Southwestern 0.8 2.2 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1 AT&T SNET 2.2 1.8 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Verizon GTE 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.9 Verizon North (Combined with Verizon South) Verizon South
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270881A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270881A1.txt
    • 40-58-42.5 N MO NE 094-42-50.1 W 0002922793 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Kansas City 02/23/2007 00128.85000 39-17-51.4 N CO NE 104-42-02.8 W 0002922803 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Colorado Springs 02/23/2007 00136.52500 38-48-20.9 N CA NE 117-11-22.8 W 0002922839 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc San Diego 02/23/2007 00136.52500 32-44-00.8 N TX NE 098-28-11.2 W 0002922845 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc San Antonio 02/23/2007 00129.67500 29-32-01.3 N CA NE 121-35-26.8 W 0002922879 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Sacramento 02/23/2007 00136.52500 38-41-43.5 N OK NE 095-53-17.2 W 0002922886 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Tulsa 02/23/2007 00129.67500 36-11-54.2 N TX NE 106-22-39.3 W 0002922889 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc El Paso 02/23/2007 00129.67500 31-48-26.1 N WA NE 117-32-01.8 W 0002922921 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Spokane 02/23/2007 00136.52500 47-37-11.5 N CA NE
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-271175A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-271175A1.txt
    • 36-22-59.9 N CA MD WLL718 121-38-25.8 W 0002929949 GTE MOBILNET OF CALIFORNIA LIMITESALINAS 02/28/2007 06315.84000 36-39-48.9 N CA MD WLL718 121-38-25.8 W 0002929949 GTE MOBILNET OF CALIFORNIA LIMITESALINAS 02/28/2007 06375.14000 36-39-48.9 N CA MD WLL718 121-38-25.8 W 0002929949 GTE MOBILNET OF CALIFORNIA LIMITESALINAS 02/28/2007 06404.79000 36-39-48.9 N CA MD WLV638 120-39-03.4 W 0002929978 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCFIREBAUGH 02/28/2007 10638.12500 36-51-01.3 N CA MD WQFY914 122-08-33.0 W 0002930767 Wiline Networks Inc Cupertino 03/01/2007 10865.00000 37-19-13.0 N IA MD WPNC691 091-10-07.0 W 0002931038 USCOC OF GREATER IOWA, INC. WEST BURLINGTO 03/01/2007 05945.20000 40-49-51.0 N IA MD WPNC691 091-10-07.0 W 0002931038 USCOC OF GREATER IOWA, INC. WEST BURLINGTO 03/01/2007 06286.19000 40-49-51.0 N IA MD WPNC691 091-10-07.0 W 0002931038 USCOC OF GREATER IOWA, INC.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-271472A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-271472A1.txt
    • its policies. For information on other microwave facilities, please refer to Public Notices released by the Media, Common Carrier, and Wireless Bureaus. CAR-20070306AA-10 ROCKETT TX WLY-779 Renewal of License CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS VI, LLC CAR-20070306AB-10 SOLEDAD PEAK CA WBW-21 Renewal of License FALCON CABLE SYSTEMS COMPANY II, L.P. CAR-20070306AC-01 LAWN TX NEW License for a New Station ALLEGIANCE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC T-L: 1.3 miles SSW of FM 604and FM 382 LAWN TX 32-06-41.0N 099-46-39.0W Channels: A02, A06, A08 (1) For further information about this Public Notice contact the Media Bureau at (202) 418-7000
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-271635A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-271635A1.txt
    • CA MD KFB51 120-42-26.6 W 0002946870 Pacific Gas and Electric Company Santa Margarita 03/12/2007 10587.50000 35-23-39.9 N CA MD KFB51 120-42-26.6 W 0002946870 Pacific Gas and Electric Company Santa Margarita 03/12/2007 10597.50000 35-23-39.9 N NH MD WNEX379 071-52-44.2 W 0002947233 NORTHEAST UTILITIES SERVICE COMPPETERBOROUGH 03/13/2007 06665.00000 42-51-38.3 N MA MD WNTX928 072-35-30.3 W 0002947240 NORTHEAST UTILITIES SERVICE COMPDEERFIELD 03/13/2007 06565.00000 42-32-01.3 N MA MD WNTX928 072-35-30.3 W 0002947240 NORTHEAST UTILITIES SERVICE COMPDEERFIELD 03/13/2007 06615.00000 42-32-01.3 N MA MD WBD396 072-56-29.3 W 0002947244 NORTHEAST UTILITIES SERVICE COMPBLANDFORD 03/13/2007 06855.00000 42-12-37.3 N MA MD WBD399 073-15-46.3 W 0002947252 Northeast Utilities Service Company PITTSFIELD 03/13/2007 06635.00000 42-26-53.3 N AR MD WNTF947 092-13-04.0 W 0002947589 ARKANSAS EDUCATIONAL TELEVISIONRedfield 03/13/2007 00956.65000 34-26-31.0 N VA MD WQFE879
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-271966A1.pdf
    • LETTERSAPPLICANT AND LOCATION N A T U R E O F A P P L I C A T I O N STATEFILE NUMBER E/P FM STATION APPLICATIONS FOR ORIGINAL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION COMMENT KFPR 66567 THE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION, CA STATE UNIVERSITY, CHICO CA REDDING , CA BPED-19880610ML 88.9 MHZ P CP FOR NEW EDUCATIONAL ON: FREQUENCY 88.9 MHZ., ERP: 1.3 KW (H&V); HAAT: 457 METERS (H&V); 40 39 14 122 31 12 DENIED PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND STAY OF GRANT FILED BY THE STATE OF OREGON ACTING BY AND THROUGH THE STATE BOARD OF HIGHER EDUCATION SUPPLEMENT FILED 7/19/01 Tentatively selected pursuant to FCC 07-40 from NCE-FM MX group 880611 to be awarded a construction permit. Petitions to deny the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272117A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272117A1.pdf
    • operation at the following unauthorized locations: Hydropneumatic Pump Station 3.1 located at 37� 56' 10" north, 121� 44' 50" west; Hydropneumatic Pump Station 3.3 located at 37� 53' 55.3" north, 121� 44' 13.7" west; Booster Pump Station 2.3 located at 37� 54' 23.8" north, 121� 43' 25.6" west; Hydropneumatic Pump Station 2.2 located at 37� 57' 27.8" north, 121� 45' 1.3" west. Control Unit operating on 452.400 MHz operating at the unauthorized location of 37� 57' 36" north, 121� 41' 18" west. 47 C.F.R. � 2.105(c)(2): ``Stations of a secondary service shall not cause harmful interference to stations of primary services . . .'' At the time of the inspections, the City's operation of WQCY221, WQCY224, and WQCY226 continued to cause
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272241A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272241A1.txt
    • N CA MD KMK67 118-57-51.3 W 0002984345 KERN, COUNTY OF BAKERSFIELD 04/06/2007 18062.50000 35-24-41.8 N CA MD KMK67 118-57-51.3 W 0002984345 KERN, COUNTY OF BAKERSFIELD 04/06/2007 18082.50000 35-24-41.8 N CA MD KMK67 118-57-51.3 W 0002984345 KERN, COUNTY OF BAKERSFIELD 04/06/2007 18107.50000 35-24-41.8 N CA MD KMK67 118-57-51.3 W 0002984345 KERN, COUNTY OF BAKERSFIELD 04/06/2007 18767.50000 35-24-41.8 N CA MD WPOV458 118-58-01.3 W 0002984346 KERN, COUNTY OF BAKERSFIELD 04/06/2007 19142.50000 35-21-40.8 N CA MD WPOV458 118-58-01.3 W 0002984346 KERN, COUNTY OF BAKERSFIELD 04/06/2007 19642.50000 35-21-40.8 N CA MD WPOV453 119-04-27.3 W 0002984347 KERN, COUNTY OF BAKERSFIELD 04/06/2007 19137.50000 35-25-04.8 N Page 6 MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272393A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272393A1.txt
    • 0002990387 Madison Cellular Telephone Company MT. HOREB 04/11/2007 06256.54000 43-00-11.6 N WI MD WPUA917 089-41-09.1 W 0002990387 Madison Cellular Telephone Company MT. HOREB 04/11/2007 06585.00000 43-00-11.6 N WI MD WPUA917 089-41-09.1 W 0002990387 Madison Cellular Telephone Company MT. HOREB 04/11/2007 10617.50000 43-00-11.6 N WY MD WQBH224 105-26-36.6 W 0002990432 Union Telephone Company Laramie 04/11/2007 10915.00000 41-13-58.6 N WY MD WQGL237 105-42-01.3 W 0002990451 Union Telelphone Company Laramie 04/11/2007 11132.50000 41-20-56.6 N WY MD WQGL237 105-42-01.3 W 0002990451 Union Telelphone Company Laramie 04/11/2007 11622.50000 41-20-56.6 N VA MD WQGP366 077-23-04.2 W 0002990473 FiberTower Network Services Corp. Prince William 04/11/2007 10755.00000 38-42-37.4 N VA MD WQGP366 077-23-04.2 W 0002990473 FiberTower Network Services Corp. Prince William 04/11/2007 10795.00000 38-42-37.4 N AZ MD WMS297 111-27-17.1
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272545A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272545A2.txt
    • 1.0 3.128.124.7 43.1 Luxembourg $3,483,601 0.8 0.020.919.6 58.7 $164,671 0.6 0.023.119.8 56.5 $57,897 98.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 35,632,116 1.6 0.012.232.8 53.4 Malta $1,010,356 6.0 0.5 9.621.9 62.0 $93,865 0.0 0.0 0.017.4 82.6 $430 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 99.8 8,175,730 4.4 0.2 6.232.5 56.6 Netherlands $46,126,097 1.4 0.026.219.7 52.7 $9,378,634 1.5 0.010.842.3 45.4 $10,375,680 97.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.7 760,730,297 1.3 0.015.331.6 51.8 Norway $16,101,944 4.2 0.014.917.7 63.2 $1,510,863 16.5 0.037.712.0 33.8 $6,588,608100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 179,963,091 4.6 0.023.721.3 50.4 Portugal $18,433,780 5.5 0.011.021.2 62.3 $1,214,563 0.8 0.0 4.028.9 66.3 $485,943 97.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.3 229,257,919 8.1 0.0 9.922.2 59.8 Spain $62,612,568 6.0 0.033.814.6 45.6 $3,784,926 24.5 0.013.026.8 35.7 $26,588,892 98.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.8 570,933,062 10.6 0.020.518.4 50.5
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272549A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272549A1.txt
    • N NV MD WMN555 116-16-14.3 W 0002995704 WWC License L.L.C. CARLIN 04/17/2007 06625.00000 40-43-06.7 N NV MD WMN560 115-37-49.0 W 0002995705 WWC License L.L.C. ELKO 04/17/2007 05974.85000 40-53-40.0 N NV MD WMN559 114-56-35.1 W 0002995706 WWC License L.L.C. ELKO 04/17/2007 06362.79000 41-11-49.7 N NV MD WMN559 114-56-35.1 W 0002995706 WWC License L.L.C. ELKO 04/17/2007 06404.79000 41-11-49.7 N NV MD WPJD342 115-51-01.3 W 0002995707 WWC License L.L.C. ELKO 04/17/2007 02171.60000 40-55-18.7 N NV MD WPJD342 115-51-01.3 W 0002995707 WWC License L.L.C. ELKO 04/17/2007 06152.75000 40-55-18.7 N NV MD WPJD342 115-51-01.3 W 0002995707 WWC License L.L.C. ELKO 04/17/2007 06197.24000 40-55-18.7 N NV MD WPJD342 115-51-01.3 W 0002995707 WWC License L.L.C. ELKO 04/17/2007 06226.89000 40-55-18.7 N NV MD WPJD342 115-51-01.3 W 0002995707 WWC License
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272772A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272772A1.txt
    • Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Richmond 04/27/2007 17950.00000 37-28-50.0 N VA NE 077-30-55.3 W 0003009248 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Richmond 04/27/2007 22110.00000 37-28-50.0 N VA NE 077-31-23.5 W 0003009288 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Richmond 04/27/2007 23310.00000 37-28-33.5 N CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City LA MD KNKA361 091-05-01.3 W 0003001966 RADIOFONE, INC., d/b/a ALLTEL BATON ROUGE 04/23/2007 30-20-57.6 N LA MD KNKA361 091-15-37.3 W 0003001966 RADIOFONE, INC., d/b/a ALLTEL Brusly 04/23/2007 30-21-59.6 N LA MD KNKA361 091-01-23.2 W 0003001966 RADIOFONE, INC., d/b/a ALLTEL DONALDSONVILLE 04/23/2007 30-06-15.3 N LA MD KNKA361 090-57-11.4 W 0003001966 RADIOFONE, INC., d/b/a ALLTEL Gonzales 04/23/2007 30-15-03.7 N Page 18 CL - Cellular State Purpose
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272904A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272904A1.txt
    • J00M01N01 J02M03N03 J04M05N05 J06 Month (March, July, November) Per cent with T elephone In Housing Unit Available Table 2 Telephone Penetration by State (Percentage of Households with Telephone Service) State Alabama 87.9% 88.7% 0.7% Alaska 83.8 96.1 12.3 * Arizona 88.8 93.5 4.7 * Arkansas 88.2 89.0 0.9 California 91.7 95.5 3.8 * Colorado 94.4 94.5 0.1 Connecticut 95.5 94.2 -1.3 Delaware 95.0 93.2 -1.9 District of Columbia 94.7 91.0 -3.7 Florida 85.5 92.0 6.4 * Georgia 88.9 89.7 0.8 Hawaii 94.6 94.6 0.0 Idaho 89.5 94.7 5.2 * Illinois 95.0 90.4 -4.6 Indiana 90.3 88.5 -1.8 Iowa 95.4 96.7 1.3 Kansas 94.9 94.5 -0.4 Kentucky 86.9 92.0 5.1 * Louisiana 88.9 94.9 6.0 * Maine 90.7 95.8 5.1 * Maryland
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272911A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272911A1.txt
    • UTIL DISTRICBANGS 05/02/2007 00956.36875 31-42-52.2 N WI NE P 087-45-58.0 W 0003014167 VILLAGE OF SAUKVILLE OFFSHORE 05/02/2007 00956.41875 43-10-32.0 N IL NE P 088-52-00.0 W 0003014192 VILLAGE OF HINCKLEY SHABBONA 05/02/2007 00956.41875 41-44-25.0 N PA NE P 080-14-15.0 W 0003014279 FAIRVIEW TOWNSHIP WATER AUTHORFAIRVIEW 05/02/2007 00956.44375 42-02-22.9 N NC NE P 078-42-13.3 W 0003014305 COLUMBUS COUNTY PUBLIC UTILITIESWHITEVILLE 05/02/2007 00956.40625 34-20-01.3 N PA NE P 076-34-39.0 W 0003014325 STEWARTSTOWN BOROUGH STEWARTSTOWN 05/02/2007 00956.44375 39-45-37.5 N ND NE P 101-17-42.0 W 0003014392 CITY OF CENTER CENTER 05/02/2007 00956.31875 47-06-41.4 N CO NE P 107-32-49.2 W 0003014402 TOWN OF NEW CASTLE NEW CASTLE 05/02/2007 00956.34375 39-33-33.8 N KS NE P 094-58-17.0 W 0003014415 CITY OF OSAWATOMIE OSAWATOMIE 05/02/2007 00956.25625 38-28-10.0 N MD NE
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272912A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272912A1.txt
    • PASO 05/01/2007 00954.95000 31-45-09.2 N TX NE 106-29-26.6 W 0003012711 EL PASO WATER UTILITIES EL PASO 05/01/2007 00955.95000 31-45-09.2 N TX NE 106-21-44.6 W 0003012712 EL PASO WATER UTILITIES EL PASO 05/01/2007 00959.55000 31-46-15.4 N OR NE 121-11-59.0 W 0003012771 Frontier Telenet The Dalles 05/01/2007 11225.00000 45-36-48.0 N NY NE 073-53-03.9 W 0003012840 NEW YORK, CITY OF Brooklyn 05/01/2007 06141.01400 40-35-01.3 N NY NE 074-14-09.5 W 0003012844 NEW YORK, CITY OF Staten Island 05/01/2007 06645.62500 40-32-21.9 N NY NE 074-14-09.5 W 0003012844 NEW YORK, CITY OF Staten Island 05/01/2007 10632.50000 40-32-21.9 N MI NE 084-36-04.0 W 0003013246 CCE Central Dispatch WOLVERINE 05/01/2007 00933.77500 45-21-01.0 N MI NE 084-36-04.0 W 0003013246 CCE Central Dispatch WOLVERINE 05/01/2007 00957.95000 45-21-01.0 N KY NE 087-25-02.8
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-273042A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-273042A1.txt
    • N AZ MD WQEX684 112-03-56.9 W 0003026281 Southwest Wireless Group, L.L.C. dba TraPHOENIX 05/11/2007 19520.00000 33-19-57.3 N AZ MD WQEX689 111-36-07.9 W 0003026285 Southwest Wireless Group, L.L.C. dba TraCoolidge 05/11/2007 17800.00000 32-59-37.8 N AZ MD WQEX689 111-36-07.9 W 0003026285 Southwest Wireless Group, L.L.C. dba TraCoolidge 05/11/2007 17880.00000 32-59-37.8 N NC MD WQDA523 078-51-43.8 W 0003026604 HARRIS CORPORATION morrisville 05/11/2007 06004.50000 35-52-01.3 N NC MD WQDA522 078-51-49.5 W 0003026605 HARRIS CORPORATION MORRISVILLE 05/11/2007 06256.54000 35-52-33.4 N AZ MD WQFG439 113-52-59.8 W 0003026818 Tucson Electric Power Company Kingman 05/11/2007 06735.00000 35-06-37.0 N NM NE 108-30-42.6 W 0003020058 BHP MINERALS LTD, NEW MEXICO OPFruitland 05/07/2007 10855.00000 36-35-13.8 N IL NE 088-22-16.0 W 0003020289 AMEREN SERVICES CORP SIBLEY 05/07/2007 00928.09375 40-35-14.0 N IL NE 088-22-16.0
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-273622A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-273622A1.txt
    • Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City IL NE 087-47-52.3 W 0003048039 OAK PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISOAK PARK 05/31/2007 23185.00000 41-52-55.1 N AL NE 088-02-04.7 W 0003049047 ALABAMA STATE PORT AUTHORITY MOBILE 06/01/2007 10755.00000 30-39-25.4 N IN NE 087-03-35.0 W 0003049211 Porter County Government Valparaiso 06/01/2007 19680.00000 41-28-07.0 N IN NE 087-03-45.6 W 0003049243 Porter County Government Valparaiso 06/01/2007 19640.00000 41-28-01.3 N RO WPNN431 0003046200 LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITA 05/30/2007 RO WPNN432 0003046201 LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITA 05/30/2007 RO WPNN430 0003046202 LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITA 05/30/2007 Page 4
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-274025A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-274025A1.txt
    • 1/ Q2 Service Provider Category 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Regional Bell Operating Companies 11.7%14.4%14.3%16.2%18.3%19.9%19.9%19.8%19.8%18.3 14.2% (RBOCs) Including CLEC Affiliates. Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers 2.6 1.4 1.5 1.7 2.1 2.8 3.2 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.1 (LECs) Other Than RBOCs Competitive Local Exchange Carriers (CLECs) Local Resellers and Other Local Carriers Other Than RBOCs 0.8 1.3 2.6 2.2 2.7 3.3 3.5 3.8 4.4 5.0 7.2 Total: Fixed Local Service Providers 15.1 17.1 18.5 20.1 23.1 26.0 26.6 27.0 27.6 26.7 24.5 Payphone Providers 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Wireless Service Providers 3.3 5.1 6.6 9.2 12.0 17.2 24.8 27.8 29.2 33.9 37.1 RBOC Toll Service Providers 1.7 1.7 2.0 2.3
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-274374A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-274374A1.txt
    • 0003065510 OREGON, STATE OF OREGON 06/11/2007 06256.54000 45-35-23.2 N OR NE 118-59-55.3 W 0003065510 OREGON, STATE OF OREGON 06/11/2007 06315.84000 45-35-23.2 N OR NE 121-33-56.1 W 0003065511 OREGON, STATE OF HOOD RIVER 06/11/2007 10715.00000 45-42-30.8 N OR NE 121-35-49.8 W 0003065512 OREGON, STATE OF OREGON 06/11/2007 10755.00000 45-34-46.3 N WA NE 122-04-16.2 W 0003065513 OREGON, STATE OF WASHINGTON 06/11/2007 06034.15000 45-41-01.3 N WA NE 122-04-16.2 W 0003065513 OREGON, STATE OF WASHINGTON 06/11/2007 06063.80000 45-41-01.3 N WA NE 121-40-52.4 W 0003066427 OREGON, STATE OF WASHINGTON 06/11/2007 06226.89000 45-44-12.6 N Page 9 MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City WA NE 121-40-52.4 W 0003066427 OREGON, STATE OF
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-274572A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-274572A1.txt
    • 41-09-32.4 N OH NE 080-29-02.3 W 0003076845 FiberTower Network Service Corp. Farrell 06/19/2007 10795.00000 41-12-58.2 N OH NE 080-39-53.3 W 0003076846 FiberTower Network Service Corp. VIENNA 06/19/2007 10835.00000 41-14-04.1 N OH NE 080-37-19.1 W 0003076847 FiberTower Network Service Corp. Youngstown 06/19/2007 23120.00000 41-07-01.4 N OH NE 080-41-33.2 W 0003076848 FiberTower Network Service Corp. YOUNGSTOWN 06/19/2007 19620.00000 41-05-30.6 N OH NE 080-44-01.3 W 0003076849 FiberTower Network Service Corp. Youngstown 06/19/2007 10855.00000 41-04-51.4 N OH NE 080-44-01.3 W 0003076849 FiberTower Network Service Corp. Youngstown 06/19/2007 18060.00000 41-04-51.4 N OH NE 080-44-01.3 W 0003076849 FiberTower Network Service Corp. Youngstown 06/19/2007 21925.00000 41-04-51.4 N OH NE 080-35-04.7 W 0003076850 FiberTower Network Service Corp. CAMPBELL 06/19/2007 11365.00000 41-05-49.2 N OH NE 080-35-04.7 W 0003076850 FiberTower Network
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275483A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275483A1.txt
    • Regional Council EmergencyLee Summit 07/19/2007 19540.00000 38-59-06.5 N MA MD WPOR775 071-05-48.1 W 0003116751 MASSACHUSETTS WATER RESOURCEROXBURY 07/20/2007 02191.20000 42-20-09.3 N MA MD WPOR775 071-05-48.1 W 0003116751 MASSACHUSETTS WATER RESOURCEROXBURY 07/20/2007 10556.25000 42-20-09.3 N WA MD WNEV797 122-47-02.0 W 0003116839 PIERCE, COUNTY OF BREMERTON 07/20/2007 05935.32000 47-32-57.0 N WA MD WNEV796 121-53-34.3 W 0003116843 PIERCE, COUNTY OF ENUMCLAW 07/20/2007 06083.57000 47-07-01.3 N WA MD WNEV796 121-53-34.3 W 0003116843 PIERCE, COUNTY OF ENUMCLAW 07/20/2007 06725.00000 47-07-01.3 N WA MD WNEV795 122-26-44.7 W 0003116847 PIERCE, COUNTY OF TACOMA 07/20/2007 06187.36000 47-15-15.0 N WA MD WNEV795 122-26-44.7 W 0003116847 PIERCE, COUNTY OF TACOMA 07/20/2007 06335.61000 47-15-15.0 N WA MD WNEV795 122-26-44.7 W 0003116847 PIERCE, COUNTY OF TACOMA 07/20/2007 06715.00000 47-15-15.0 N MA MD WPOR774
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275804A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275804A1.txt
    • MD WLF976 070-56-36.1 W 0003124802 MCC BROADCASTING COMPANY, INC.LYNN 07/30/2007 00944.62500 42-27-53.3 N MA MD WLF976 070-56-36.1 W 0003124802 MCC BROADCASTING COMPANY, INC.LYNN 07/30/2007 00945.00000 42-27-53.3 N NY MD WRE41 074-00-17.3 W 0003125692 AMFM RADIO LICENSES, L.L.C. New York 07/31/2007 00948.50000 40-43-12.2 N OR MD WPVQ521 122-40-37.5 W 0003125830 CITICASTERS LICENSES, L.P. PORTLAND 07/31/2007 00948.50000 45-29-14.7 N OR MD WLO308 122-34-01.3 W 0003125966 CITICASTERS LICENSES, L.P. CLACKAMAS 07/31/2007 00950.87500 45-25-15.0 N OR MD WPNK609 122-40-37.5 W 0003126201 CITICASTERS LICENSES, L.P. PORTLAND 07/31/2007 00947.50000 45-29-14.7 N OR MD WPNF847 122-34-01.3 W 0003126318 CITICASTERS LICENSES, L.P. CLACKAMAS 07/31/2007 00950.00000 45-25-15.0 N OR MD WMV423 122-52-55.0 W 0003127013 CITICASTERS LICENSES, L.P. MEDFORD 08/01/2007 00950.00000 42-22-09.0 N HI MD WCG756 157-52-11.1 W 0003127038 CAPSTAR TX
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275829A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275829A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275829A1.txt
    • numbering resource utilization statistics based on June 2006 data that carriers submitted to the North American Numbering Plan Administrator (NANPA), as well as other information. Tracking number utilization is one of a number of initiatives taken by the Commission to ensure that limited numbering resources are used efficiently. Summary Data Utilization Statistics by Carrier Type - Reporting carriers have over 1.3 billion telephone numbers. Of these, nearly 599 million were assigned to customers, about 694 million were available to be assigned, and about 92 million were used for other purposes, such as for administrative use. Following are utilization statistics by carrier type as of June 30, 2006: Overall, 43.3% of all telephone numbers were assigned to customers. The overall utilization rate
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275917A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275917A1.pdf
    • 461.225 MHz in Newfoundland, Pennsylvania, not Carbondale. Furthermore, the agent found that Conway is operating station WPNT858 on the antenna structure 1025402 in Carbondale, Pennsylvania at the wrong coordinates. Conway is operating station WPNT858 from the coordinates 41-32-41.2 N Latitude 075-27-39.3 W Longitude. The license for station WPNT858 specifies that Conway must operate its station in Carbondale at the coordinates 41-33-01.3 N Latitude 075-27-26.7 W Longitude. 47 C.F.R. � 90.425(a) "Stations licensed under this part . . . shall be identified by the transmission of the assigned call sign during each transmission or exchange of transmissions, or once each 15 minutes . . . during periods of continuous operation." Between 1:45 p.m. and 2:30 p.m. on July 18, 2007, the agent
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276117A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276117A1.txt
    • 08/14/2007 00136.62500 40-38-23.1 N KS NE 100-43-27.9 W 0003138114 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Garden City 08/14/2007 00130.35000 37-55-39.1 N MD NE 076-04-08.4 W 0003138124 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Easton 08/14/2007 00131.77500 38-48-15.0 N MD NE 077-43-46.2 W 0003138125 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Hagerstown 08/14/2007 00130.50000 39-42-28.6 N TX NE 098-28-11.2 W 0003138127 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc San Antonio 08/14/2007 00129.60000 29-32-01.3 N NM NE 104-31-50.0 W 0003138206 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Roswell 08/14/2007 00131.95000 33-18-05.0 N NM NE 106-05-21.9 W 0003138233 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Santa Fe 08/14/2007 00131.95000 35-37-01.2 N AR NE 094-18-24.5 W 0003138235 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Fayetteville 08/14/2007 00128.95000 36-16-54.7 N VA NE 078-27-10.3 W 0003138241 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Charlottesville 08/14/2007 00130.55000 38-08-19.1 N VA NE
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276276A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276276A1.txt
    • GM - 800 MHz Conventional SMR (SMR, Site-specific) State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MD WPHE953 A 0003145542 ALLEN, CAROL J 08/21/2007 00809.00000 - 00824.00000 CA MD WPHE953 X 0003145542 ALLEN, CAROL J 08/21/2007 00809.00000 - 00824.00000 NY MD WPHE953 073-45-42.4 W 0003145542 ALLEN, CAROL J ALBANY 08/21/2007 00860.56250 42-38-01.3 N MD WPHY511 A 0003145559 ALLEN, DAVID M 08/21/2007 00809.00000 - 00824.00000 TX MD WPHY511 097-18-44.0 W 0003145559 ALLEN, DAVID M CORPUS CHRISTI 08/21/2007 00860.06250 27-36-25.1 N MD WPHG525 A 0003145586 Estate of Eugene M. Allen 08/21/2007 00809.00000 - 00824.00000 Page 22 GM - 800 MHz Conventional SMR (SMR, Site-specific) State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276392A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276392A1.txt
    • 097-23-42.1 W 0003156814 Dallas MTA, LP MCGREGOR 08/28/2007 06795.62500 31-26-41.5 N IN NE 087-30-19.9 W 0003156818 Nextel License Holdings 4, Inc. Hammond 08/28/2007 10578.12500 41-41-38.5 N AZ NE 109-19-36.0 W 0003156863 Smith Bagley Inc DBA Cellular One of NE SANDERS 08/28/2007 06093.45000 35-10-00.0 N NM NE 108-44-01.7 W 0003156925 Smith Bagley Inc DBA Cellular One of NE GALLUP 08/28/2007 19625.00000 35-31-01.3 N AZ NE 109-12-07.3 W 0003156947 Smith Bagley Inc DBA Cellular One of NE Sanders 08/28/2007 05974.85000 35-06-01.1 N AZ NE 109-12-07.3 W 0003156947 Smith Bagley Inc DBA Cellular One of NE Sanders 08/28/2007 06063.80000 35-06-01.1 N AZ NE 109-12-07.3 W 0003156947 Smith Bagley Inc DBA Cellular One of NE Sanders 08/28/2007 06123.10000 35-06-01.1 N AZ NE 109-12-07.3 W 0003156947
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276539A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276539A1.txt
    • Newark 09/05/2007 18060.00000 40-42-34.0 N NY NE 079-03-20.5 W 0003162985 TRANSWAVE COMMUNICATION SYSTENIAGARA FALLS 09/05/2007 11265.00000 43-05-11.5 N NY NE 077-30-19.2 W 0003163214 New York RSA No. 3 Cellular PartnershipBath 09/05/2007 05974.85000 42-20-36.6 N NY NE 077-30-19.2 W 0003163214 New York RSA No. 3 Cellular PartnershipBath 09/05/2007 11325.00000 42-20-36.6 N NY NE 078-52-32.6 W 0003163222 TRANSWAVE COMMUNICATION SYSTEBUFFALO 09/05/2007 06093.45000 42-53-01.3 N WY NE 105-22-43.4 W 0003163629 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Bill 09/06/2007 06625.00000 43-23-55.1 N WY NE 105-22-43.4 W 0003163629 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Bill 09/06/2007 10642.50000 43-23-55.1 N WY NE 105-28-01.0 W 0003163724 CommNet Cellular License Holding LLC GILLETTE 09/06/2007 06785.00000 43-44-39.0 N MA NE 070-56-35.0 W 0003163833 Cellco Partnership Middletown 09/06/2007 10647.50000 41-53-35.2 N FL NE 086-33-02.4 W
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276850A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276850A1.txt
    • FCI 900, INC. MEMPHIS 09/20/2007 00938.66250 35-02-32.7 N TN MD WQBE531 089-58-36.0 W 0003177721 FCI 900, INC. MEMPHIS 09/20/2007 00938.67500 35-02-32.7 N TN MD WQBE531 089-58-36.0 W 0003177721 FCI 900, INC. MEMPHIS 09/20/2007 00938.68750 35-02-32.7 N MD WQBE533 A 0003177722 FCI 900, INC. 09/20/2007 00896.00000 - 00901.00000 TX MD WQBE533 098-28-11.2 W 0003177722 FCI 900, INC. SAN ANTONIO 09/20/2007 00935.22500 29-32-01.3 N TX MD WQBE533 098-28-11.2 W 0003177722 FCI 900, INC. SAN ANTONIO 09/20/2007 00935.25000 29-32-01.3 N TX MD WQBE533 098-28-11.2 W 0003177722 FCI 900, INC. SAN ANTONIO 09/20/2007 00935.73750 29-32-01.3 N Page 52 YS - SMR, 896-901/935-940 MHz, Trunked State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TX MD WQBE533 098-28-11.2
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276852A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276852A1.txt
    • Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City IL MD WNTL982 088-09-56.2 W 0003175041 City of Naperville LISLE 09/18/2007 11196.25000 41-42-03.1 N IL MD WNTV700 088-07-39.2 W 0003175046 City of Naperville NAPERVILLE 09/18/2007 02181.60000 41-44-06.1 N IL MD WNTV700 088-07-39.2 W 0003175046 City of Naperville NAPERVILLE 09/18/2007 11158.75000 41-44-06.1 N IL MD WQFQ768 088-12-15.5 W 0003175844 PLAINFIELD COMMUNITY CONSOLIDATPLAINFIELD 09/18/2007 17765.00000 41-36-01.3 N IL MD WQFQ768 088-12-15.5 W 0003175844 PLAINFIELD COMMUNITY CONSOLIDATPLAINFIELD 09/18/2007 17820.00000 41-36-01.3 N CO MD WQER927 108-01-46.0 W 0003176499 STATE OF COLORADO MAYBELL 09/19/2007 06755.62500 40-26-58.0 N CO MD KCM96 107-36-36.2 W 0003176617 STATE OF COLORADO CRAIG 09/19/2007 06585.00000 40-33-57.9 N CO MD KCM96 107-36-36.2 W 0003176617 STATE OF COLORADO CRAIG 09/19/2007 06595.62500 40-33-57.9 N CO MD KCM96 107-36-36.2
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277038A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277038A1.txt
    • W 0003181161 GTE Mobilnet of South Texas Limited PartBEAUMONT 09/24/2007 10915.00000 30-05-03.0 N AK MD WHD940 132-58-52.1 W 0003181447 ALASCOM, INC. PETERSBURG 09/25/2007 06870.62500 56-14-10.7 N AK MD WPNL604 132-49-40.1 W 0003181448 ALASCOM, INC. COFFMAN COVE 09/25/2007 06525.62500 56-00-57.7 N CA MD WQCF657 118-04-09.3 W 0003181457 Omnipoint NY MTA License, LLC LITTLE LAKE 09/25/2007 10577.50000 36-27-55.1 N CA MD WQEF815 118-00-01.3 W 0003181637 Omnipoint NY MTA License, LLC Olancha 09/25/2007 10642.50000 36-12-34.0 N WA MD WPJF466 117-05-55.0 W 0003182130 RCC Minnesota, Inc CLARKSTON 09/25/2007 06595.00000 46-27-28.0 N WA MD WPSZ592 117-10-29.0 W 0003182133 RCC Minnesota, Inc ALBION 09/25/2007 06755.00000 46-51-45.0 N OR MD WLB633 122-40-45.3 W 0003182137 MCI Communications Services, Inc. PORTLAND 09/25/2007 05945.20000 45-31-16.4 N OR MD WLB633 122-40-45.3 W
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277103A6.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277103A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277103A6.txt
    • telephone companies that acquired exchanges subsequent to May 7, [[Page 445]] 1997, and incorporated those acquired exchanges into existing study areas shall separately provide the information required by paragraphs (a) through (h) of this section for both the acquired and existing exchanges. (a) Unseparated, i.e., state and interstate, gross plant investment in Exchange Line Cable and Wire Facilities (C&WF) Subcategory 1.3 and Exchange Line Central Office (CO) Circuit Equipment Category 4.13. This amount shall be calculated as of December 31st of the calendar year preceding each July 31st filing. (b) Unseparated accumulated depreciation and noncurrent deferred federal income taxes, attributable to Exchange Line C&WF Subcategory 1.3 investment, and Exchange Line CO Circuit Equipment Category 4.13 investment. These amounts shall be calculated
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277148A1.pdf
    • 418-0500 News media information REPORT NO.46587 APPLICANT AND LOCATION CALL LETTERS N A T U R E O F A P P L I C A T I O N FILE NUMBER STATE E/P 10/03/2007 Actions of: FM STATION APPLICATIONS FOR ORIGINAL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT GRANTED , REDDING 88.9 MHZ P CA CP FOR NEW EDUCATIONAL ON: FREQUENCY 88.9 MHZ., ERP: 1.3 KW (H&V); HAAT: 457 METERS (H&V); 40 39 14 122 31 12 DENIED PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND STAY OF GRANT FILED BY THE STATE OF OREGON ACTING BY AND THROUGH THE STATE BOARD OF HIGHER EDUCATION SUPPLEMENT FILED 7/19/01 Tentatively selected pursuant to FCC 07-40 from NCE-FM MX group 880611 to be awarded a construction permit. Petitions to deny the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277200A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277200A1.txt
    • LLC Rosemont 10/01/2007 10715.00000 36-00-35.8 N NC AM 080-13-15.9 W 0003145556 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC Rosemont 10/01/2007 10835.00000 36-00-35.8 N NC AM 080-13-15.9 W 0003145556 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC Rosemont 10/01/2007 10875.00000 36-00-35.8 N NC AM 080-13-15.9 W 0003145556 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC Rosemont 10/01/2007 11425.00000 36-00-35.8 N AZ AM 111-00-40.5 W 0003183561 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLc Amphitheater 10/01/2007 17815.00000 32-20-01.3 N AZ AM 111-00-40.5 W 0003183561 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLc Amphitheater 10/01/2007 17865.00000 32-20-01.3 N AZ AM 111-00-40.5 W 0003183561 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLc Amphitheater 10/01/2007 17915.00000 32-20-01.3 N AZ AM 111-00-40.5 W 0003183561 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLc Amphitheater 10/01/2007 18065.00000 32-20-01.3 N AZ AM 111-00-40.5 W 0003183561 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLc Amphitheater 10/01/2007 23025.00000 32-20-01.3 N AZ AM 111-00-40.5
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277386A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277386A1.txt
    • OF THE MVOORHEES 10/10/2007 00855.01250 39-51-00.4 N NJ MD KNDN369 075-00-00.6 W 0003195454 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS OF THE MVOORHEES 10/10/2007 00855.83750 39-51-00.4 N Page 16 GX - SMR, 806-821/851-866 MHz, Conventional State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City PA MD KNDN381 076-59-23.6 W 0003195455 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS OF THE MMECHANICSBURG 10/10/2007 00855.83750 40-13-01.3 N GA MD KNDN388 084-11-05.7 W 0003195456 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 1 INC. ALBANY 10/10/2007 00855.83750 31-34-41.6 N NJ MD KNDN389 075-00-40.0 W 0003195457 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS OF THE MVINELAND 10/10/2007 00855.83750 39-29-01.0 N FL MD KNEC276 080-11-23.2 W 0003195458 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 1 INC. MIAMI 10/10/2007 00855.81250 25-46-25.4 N FL MD KNEC276 080-11-23.2 W 0003195458 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 1 INC. MIAMI
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277519A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277519A1.txt
    • VALLEJO 10/15/2007 19405.00000 38-05-31.0 N TN MD WMR850 086-44-09.9 W 0003199281 Verizon Wireless Tennessee PartnershipMADISON 10/15/2007 10755.00000 36-15-56.1 N TN MD WMR850 086-44-09.9 W 0003199281 Verizon Wireless Tennessee PartnershipMADISON 10/15/2007 10835.00000 36-15-56.1 N TN MD WMR850 086-44-09.9 W 0003199281 Verizon Wireless Tennessee PartnershipMADISON 10/15/2007 10875.00000 36-15-56.1 N ME MD KCK73 069-07-45.1 W 0003199341 Verizon New England, Inc. ROCKLAND 10/15/2007 10795.00000 44-08-01.3 N ME MD KCK72 068-53-28.1 W 0003199342 Verizon New England, Inc. VINALHAVEN 10/15/2007 11285.00000 44-06-25.3 N IL MD WQHP245 089-41-01.3 W 0003200679 USCOC OF GREATER MISSOURI, LLCTRENTON 10/16/2007 06004.50000 38-36-52.1 N IL MD WQHP245 089-41-01.3 W 0003200679 USCOC OF GREATER MISSOURI, LLCTRENTON 10/16/2007 06063.80000 38-36-52.1 N IL MD WQHP245 089-41-01.3 W 0003200679 USCOC OF GREATER MISSOURI, LLCTRENTON 10/16/2007 10617.50000 38-36-52.1
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277560A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277560A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277560A1.txt
    • 33 0 obj<>stream +Ќ�\`�� ...�۴�]... �-�n'��� N' endstream endobj 34 0 obj<> endobj 35 0 obj<> endobj 36 0 obj<> endobj 37 0 obj<>stream xmlns:pdf='http://ns.adobe.com/pdf/1.3/' pdf:Producer='Acrobat Distiller 6.0 (Windows)'> 7 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Mary DiamondMary Diamond endstream endobj 38 0 obj<
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277705A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277705A1.pdf
      • R 25 0 R]/Type/Pages/Parent 57 0 R>> endobj 59 0 obj<> endobj 60 0 obj<>stream xmlns:pdf='http://ns.adobe.com/pdf/1.3/' pdf:Producer='Acrobat Distiller 6.0.1 (Windows)'> true.mmbpdfpc endstream endobj 61 0 obj<> endobj xref 0 62 0000000000 65535 f 0000008388 00000 n 0000008515 00000 n 0000008645 00000 n 0000009623 00000 n 0000009750 00000 n 0000009880
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277959A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277959A1.txt
      • Networks Inc Cupertino 11/02/2007 19315.00000 37-19-13.0 N CA AM WQFY914 122-08-33.0 W 0003137235 Wiline Networks Inc Cupertino 11/02/2007 19560.00000 37-19-13.0 N CA AM WQFY914 122-08-33.0 W 0003137235 Wiline Networks Inc Cupertino 11/02/2007 19600.00000 37-19-13.0 N CA AM 122-02-10.4 W 0003179976 WiLine Networks Inc. Sunnyvale 11/02/2007 11465.00000 37-22-55.7 N AZ AM 111-00-40.5 W 0003183561 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLc Amphitheater 10/29/2007 17815.00000 32-20-01.3 N AZ AM 111-00-40.5 W 0003183561 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLc Amphitheater 10/29/2007 17865.00000 32-20-01.3 N AZ AM 111-00-40.5 W 0003183561 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLc Amphitheater 10/29/2007 17915.00000 32-20-01.3 N AZ AM 111-00-40.5 W 0003183561 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLc Amphitheater 10/29/2007 18065.00000 32-20-01.3 N AZ AM 111-00-40.5 W 0003183561 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLc Amphitheater 10/29/2007 23025.00000 32-20-01.3 N AZ AM 111-00-40.5
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277961A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277961A1.txt
      • 10/29/2007 06800.00000 35-34-21.0 N NC NE 079-27-55.0 W 0003212178 North Carolina State Highway Patrol Siler City 10/29/2007 06825.00000 35-34-21.0 N NC NE 079-39-21.0 W 0003212182 North Carolina State Highway Patrol Coleridge 10/29/2007 06665.00000 35-34-49.0 N CA NE 117-19-59.2 W 0003212375 City of Oceanside Oceanside 10/29/2007 23475.00000 33-12-02.8 N MA NE 073-01-46.4 W 0003212545 BERKSHIRE COUNTY SHERIFF' S OFFISAVOY 10/29/2007 00958.35000 42-36-01.3 N MA NE 073-18-47.4 W 0003212546 BERKSHIRE COUNTY SHERIFF' S OFFIGREAT BARRINGT 10/29/2007 00942.77500 42-10-20.3 N CA NE 117-10-24.8 W 0003212554 Unified Port of San Diego San Diego 10/29/2007 23135.00000 32-43-04.2 N CA NE 117-10-07.4 W 0003212555 Unified Port of San Diego San Diego 10/29/2007 21935.00000 32-42-58.4 N Page 6 MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278044A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278044A1.pdf
      • check off ``Modification''; or for requests to return existing p-ANI resources, the p-ANI Applicant shall check off ``Return''. Section 1.1 The p-ANI Applicant submitting the request shall provide their Company Name, DBA Name(s) if applicable, the company's NENA Company ID and contact information. Section 1.2 The p-ANI Applicant shall enter the PSAP information and the PSAP Coordinator contact information. Section 1.3 For requests for new p-ANI resources, the p-ANI Applicant shall enter the valid NPA's in which the p-ANI resources are being sought in the order of preference, the OCN the p-ANI resources will be assigned to, and the total number of p-ANIs requested. If a specific p-ANI range is preferred, the p-ANI Applicant shall enter the requested p-ANI range. For
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278185A1.pdf
      • AND LOCATION N A T U R E O F A P P L I C A T I O N STATEFILE NUMBER E/P FM STATION APPLICATIONS FOR ORIGINAL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION KFPR 66567 RESEARCH FOUNDATION, CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY AT CHICO CA REDDING , CA BPED-19880610ML 88.9 MHZ P CP FOR NEW EDUCATIONAL ON: FREQUENCY 88.9 MHZ., ERP: 1.3 KW (H&V); HAAT: 457 METERS (H&V); 40 39 14 122 31 12 DENIED PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND STAY OF GRANT FILED BY THE STATE OF OREGON ACTING BY AND THROUGH THE STATE BOARD OF HIGHER EDUCATION SUPPLEMENT FILED 7/19/01 Tentatively selected pursuant to FCC 07-40 from NCE-FM MX group 880611 to be awarded a construction permit. Petitions to deny the
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278415A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278415A1.txt
      • LICENSE HOLDINGS 4, INC MANGUM 11/19/2007 00853.91250 34-49-13.0 N OK MD WQDF474 099-32-23.0 W 0003235181 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 4, INC MANGUM 11/19/2007 00853.93750 34-49-13.0 N OK MD WQDF474 099-32-23.0 W 0003235181 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 4, INC MANGUM 11/19/2007 00853.96250 34-49-13.0 N OK MD WQDF474 099-32-23.0 W 0003235181 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 4, INC MANGUM 11/19/2007 00853.98750 34-49-13.0 N TX MD WQDF475 099-45-01.3 W 0003235182 NEXTEL WIP LICENSE CORP. CROWELL 11/19/2007 00853.53750 33-59-04.3 N TX MD WQDF475 099-45-01.3 W 0003235182 NEXTEL WIP LICENSE CORP. CROWELL 11/19/2007 00853.58750 33-59-04.3 N TX MD WQDF475 099-45-01.3 W 0003235182 NEXTEL WIP LICENSE CORP. CROWELL 11/19/2007 00853.61250 33-59-04.3 N TX MD WQDF475 099-45-01.3 W 0003235182 NEXTEL WIP LICENSE CORP. CROWELL 11/19/2007 00853.63750 33-59-04.3 N TX MD WQDF475 099-45-01.3
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278416A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278416A1.txt
      • 100-13-11.4 W 0003235251 NEXTEL OF TEXAS, INC CHILDRESS 11/19/2007 00853.13750 34-26-20.2 N TX MD WQFS362 100-13-11.4 W 0003235251 NEXTEL OF TEXAS, INC CHILDRESS 11/19/2007 00853.86250 34-26-20.2 N TX MD WQFS362 100-13-11.4 W 0003235251 NEXTEL OF TEXAS, INC CHILDRESS 11/19/2007 00854.08750 34-26-20.2 N TX MD WQFS362 100-13-11.4 W 0003235251 NEXTEL OF TEXAS, INC CHILDRESS 11/19/2007 00854.63750 34-26-20.2 N TX MD WQFS363 099-45-01.3 W 0003235252 NEXTEL OF TEXAS, INC CROWELL 11/19/2007 00851.38750 33-59-04.3 N TX MD WQFS363 099-45-01.3 W 0003235252 NEXTEL OF TEXAS, INC CROWELL 11/19/2007 00851.61250 33-59-04.3 N Page 15 YX - SMR, 806-821/851-866 MHz, Trunked State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TX MD WQFS363 099-45-01.3 W 0003235252 NEXTEL OF TEXAS,
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278832A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278832A1.txt
      • NE 123-08-21.0 W 0003247119 KUOW/PUGET SOUND PUBLIC RADIOLittlerock 12/03/2007 06715.00000 46-58-30.6 N WA NE 123-08-21.0 W 0003247119 KUOW/PUGET SOUND PUBLIC RADIOLittlerock 12/03/2007 19310.00000 46-58-30.6 N WA NE 122-55-10.8 W 0003247519 KUOW/PUGET SOUND PUBLIC RADIOTUMWATER 12/03/2007 17750.00000 47-00-23.9 N NY NE 078-51-58.3 W 0003248102 TRANSWAVE COMMUNICATION SYSTEBuffalo 12/03/2007 19400.00000 42-54-02.6 N NY NE 078-52-32.6 W 0003248196 TRANSWAVE COMMUNICATION SYSTEBuffalo 12/03/2007 06093.45000 42-53-01.3 N NY NE 078-52-32.6 W 0003248196 TRANSWAVE COMMUNICATION SYSTEBuffalo 12/03/2007 17840.00000 42-53-01.3 N MT NE 104-09-14.0 W 0003248646 ConocoPhillips Communications Inc. Baker 12/04/2007 00928.24375 46-19-11.1 N MT NE 104-09-14.0 W 0003248646 ConocoPhillips Communications Inc. Baker 12/04/2007 00952.24375 46-19-11.1 N GM NE 091-29-20.3 W 0003249155 ANR PIPELINE COMPANY OFFSHORE 12/04/2007 00954.20000 28-38-05.8 N GM NE 091-24-15.4 W 0003249157 ANR PIPELINE COMPANY
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278833A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278833A1.txt
      • 0003251741 MEDIA GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS HYOUNGSTOWN 12/06/2007 02025.00000 - 02025.50000 30-21-08.7 N FL MD KB96864 P 085-23-27.7 W 0003251741 MEDIA GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS HYOUNGSTOWN 12/06/2007 02025.50000 - 02109.50000 30-21-08.7 N FL MD KB96864 P 085-23-27.7 W 0003251741 MEDIA GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS HYOUNGSTOWN 12/06/2007 02109.50000 - 02110.00000 30-21-08.7 N AL MD KA35293 P 086-48-35.9 W 0003251742 MEDIA GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS HBIRMINGHAM 12/06/2007 02025.00000 - 02025.50000 33-31-01.3 N AL MD KA35293 P 086-48-35.9 W 0003251742 MEDIA GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS HBIRMINGHAM 12/06/2007 02076.00000 - 02093.00000 33-31-01.3 N AL MD KA35293 P 086-48-35.9 W 0003251742 MEDIA GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS HBIRMINGHAM 12/06/2007 02076.00000 - 02093.00000 33-31-01.3 N AL MD KA35293 P 086-48-35.9 W 0003251742 MEDIA GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS HBIRMINGHAM 12/06/2007 02085.50000 - 02097.50000 33-31-01.3 N AL MD KA35293 P 086-48-35.9 W 0003251742 MEDIA
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279015A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279015A1.txt
      • NETWORKS, INFinksburg 12/07/2007 10835.00000 39-29-31.5 N MD NE 076-26-26.7 W 0003253497 METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS, INEdgemere 12/07/2007 10795.00000 39-14-13.4 N TX NE 097-15-16.3 W 0003253498 METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS, INRoanoke 12/07/2007 11245.00000 33-01-31.9 N TX NE 097-09-27.0 W 0003253499 METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS, INRoanoke 12/07/2007 10715.00000 32-59-09.4 N TX NE 097-09-27.0 W 0003253499 METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS, INRoanoke 12/07/2007 10755.00000 32-59-09.4 N TX NE 097-39-01.3 W 0003253500 METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS, INSPRINGTOWN 12/07/2007 10795.00000 32-55-39.4 N TX NE 097-41-27.4 W 0003253501 METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS, INSPRINGTOWN 12/07/2007 11285.00000 32-58-50.3 N TX NE 097-41-27.4 W 0003253501 METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS, INSPRINGTOWN 12/07/2007 11405.00000 32-58-50.3 N TX NE 097-32-51.8 W 0003253502 METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS, INAzle 12/07/2007 10835.00000 32-55-05.0 N Page 33 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
      • State Code Reference ............................................................................................... Table 8.5 Subscribership - Household - United States ........................................................... Table 6.1 Switch Downtime and Trunk Blocking ................................................................... Table 9.2 Switch Downtime Causes ....................................................................................... Table 9.3 Switching Systems .................................................................................................. Table 10.1 Taxes ................................................................................................................ Table 11.11 Telecommunications Industry Revenues by Service ............................................. Table 1.2 Telecommunications Industry Revenues - Total ...................................................Table 1.1 Telecommunications Revenues by Type of Carrier ..............................................Table 1.3 Telecommunications Revenues - Interstate ........................................................ Table 1.16 Telecommunications Revenues - Intrastate ........................................................ Table 1.15 Telecommunications Revenues - Total - by State ................................................. Table 1.13 Telecommunications Revenues - 2002................................... ................... Table 1.14 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs ...........................Table 8.3 Transmission Systems ............................................................................................. Table 10.2 Universal Service Program Requirements and Contribution Factors ..................... Table 1.10 Universal Service Support
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A11.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A11.txt
      • Events 0 0 7 2 107 8 68 48 Events per Hundred Switches 0.0 0.0 3.4 3.0 8.1 3.0 242.9 18.0 Events per Million Access Lines 0.00 0.00 5.85 2.44 15.86 36.00 91.63 103.20 Average Outage Duration in Minutes NA NA 405.6 83.5 447.0 313.2 312.2 293.8 Average Lines Affected per Event in Thousands NA NA 3.0 3.0 8.5 0.4 1.3 0.5 Outage Line-Minutes per Event in Thousands NA NA 989.6 267.9 3,731.0 109.7 902.3 117.1 Outage Line-Minutes per 1,000 Access Lines 0.0 0.0 5,789.9 652.8 59,192.0 3,948.8 82,675.6 12,087.4 For Scheduled Downtime More Than 2 Minutes Number of Occurrences or Events 0 0 0 0 3 0 4 6 Events per Hundred Switches 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 14.3
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A2.txt
      • State Code Reference ............................................................................................... Table 8.5 Subscribership - Household - United States ........................................................... Table 6.1 Switch Downtime and Trunk Blocking ................................................................... Table 9.2 Switch Downtime Causes ....................................................................................... Table 9.3 Switching Systems .................................................................................................. Table 10.1 Taxes ................................................................................................................ Table 11.11 Telecommunications Industry Revenues by Service ............................................. Table 1.2 Telecommunications Industry Revenues - Total ...................................................Table 1.1 Telecommunications Revenues by Type of Carrier ..............................................Table 1.3 Telecommunications Revenues - Interstate ........................................................ Table 1.16 Telecommunications Revenues - Intrastate ........................................................ Table 1.15 Telecommunications Revenues - Total - by State ................................................. Table 1.13 Telecommunications Revenues - 2002................................... ................... Table 1.14 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs ...........................Table 8.3 Transmission Systems ............................................................................................. Table 10.2 Universal Service Program Requirements and Contribution Factors ..................... Table 1.10 Universal Service Support
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A3.txt
      • corrections have been made based on supplemental filer information or as a result of audits. Nonetheless, disaggregated data are likely to be less accurate than industry totals. Table 1.1 shows the major components of telecommunications revenues for 1997 through 2006. This table was created by simply aggregating the revenues in the major classifications designated on Form 499-A. Tables 1.2 and 1.3 provide a look at annual industry revenues over time. Generally, Form 499-A revenue data can be tabulated in two distinct ways: by type of service provided and by type of business. Table 1.2 categorizes revenues by type of service and shows, for example, that carriers reported $107.1 billion in wireless service revenues for 2005. This total includes wireless service revenues
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A8.txt
      • * Georgia 86.2 90.5 4.3 * Hawaii 93.5 95.5 2.0 * Idaho 90.7 95.5 4.8 * Illinois 94.2 90.8 -3.4 # Indiana 91.6 89.3 -2.3 # Iowa 96.2 96.1 -0.1 Kansas 94.3 94.3 0.0 Kentucky 88.1 91.3 3.1 * Louisiana 89.7 93.9 4.2 * Maine 93.4 96.3 2.9 * Maryland 95.7 95.4 -0.3 Massachusetts 95.9 95.3 -0.6 Michigan 92.8 94.2 1.3 * Minnesota 95.8 97.6 1.8 * Mississippi 82.4 90.5 8.1 * Missouri 91.5 94.9 3.4 * Montana 91.0 93.3 2.3 * Nebraska 95.7 93.5 -2.2 # Nevada 90.4 93.0 2.6 * New Hampshire 94.3 96.4 2.1 * New Jersey 94.8 94.9 0.1 New Mexico 82.0 88.5 6.5 * New York 91.8 91.6 -0.1 North Carolina 88.3 93.3 5.0 * North
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.txt
      • of 1934. 47 U.S.C. �� 151 et seq. 1956 - 2006 1996 - 2006 CPI All Items 4.1 % 2.5% CPI All Services 5.0 3.2 CPI Telephone Services ** 1.7 -0.3 CPI Major Categories: - Food & Beverages * 2.4 - Housing * 2.9 - Apparel 2.2 -1.0 - Transportation 3.5 2.4 - Medical Care 5.1 4.0 - Recreation * 1.3 - Other Goods & Services * 4.1 CPI Public Transportation 4.6 2.2 CPI Utility Natural Gas Service 4.0 7.5 CPI Electricity 3.1 2.5 CPI Sewer & Water Maintenance 4.8 3.8 CPI Postage 4.3 2.3 *** Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics. Chart 7.1 The CPI telephone service index was revised in December of 1997. Table 7.1 Long-Term Changes for Various Price
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279353A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279353A1.txt
      • Kinsley 37-47-32.3 N KS 99-21-22.3 W 2 1 12/02/2007 WQFA751 MO ONEOK, Inc. 956.43125000 Iuka 37-50-29.0 N KS 98-41-12.5 W 2 1 12/02/2007 WQFA754 MO ONEOK, Inc. 956.43125000 Timken 38-28-19.9 N KS 99-11-57.1 W 2 1 12/02/2007 WQFA763 MO ONEOK, Inc. 956.43125000 Natoma 39-7-34.7 N KS 99-2-0.6 W 2 1 12/02/2007 WQFA764 MO ONEOK, Inc. 956.40625000 Norwich 37-31-48.0 N KS 97-50-1.3 W 2 1 12/02/2007 WQFA765 MO ONEOK, Inc. 956.35625000 Faucett 39-38-9.6 N MO 94-52-21.4 W 2 1 Page 4
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279506A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279506A1.txt
      • 0003281885 PR WIRELESS, INC. JUANA DIAZ CELLU 01/11/2008 06785.00000 18-02-28.0 N CA MD WQFJ746 123-16-23.5 W 0003277738 Edge Wireless Licenses, LLC Willets 01/07/2008 06825.00000 39-19-22.7 N CA MD WPUC906 123-34-44.0 W 0003277740 Edge Wireless Licenses, LLC Laytonville 01/07/2008 06665.00000 39-41-37.0 N CA MD WLM874 118-00-53.2 W 0003277840 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership WHITTIER 01/07/2008 18090.00000 34-01-02.0 N CA MD WQDM578 118-09-01.3 W 0003278059 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership Lancaster 01/07/2008 11245.00000 34-39-58.9 N CA MD WLT475 118-08-42.3 W 0003278067 LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNEPALMDALE 01/07/2008 10755.00000 34-31-47.0 N Page 4 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TN MD WLM908 089-48-28.0 W
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279531A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279531A1.txt
      • GOVERNMENT FAIRDALE 01/10/2008 06286.19000 38-04-36.6 N KY NE 085-29-57.1 W 0003282639 LOUISVILLE METRO GOVERNMENT JEFFERSONTOWN 01/10/2008 06345.49000 38-11-03.7 N KY NE 085-29-57.1 W 0003282639 LOUISVILLE METRO GOVERNMENT JEFFERSONTOWN 01/10/2008 06375.14000 38-11-03.7 N KY NE 085-39-05.8 W 0003282640 LOUISVILLE METRO GOVERNMENT Louisville 01/10/2008 05945.20000 38-16-12.9 N KY NE 085-39-05.8 W 0003282640 LOUISVILLE METRO GOVERNMENT Louisville 01/10/2008 06093.45000 38-16-12.9 N KY NE 085-34-01.3 W 0003282641 LOUISVILLE METRO GOVERNMENT Louisville 01/10/2008 05945.20000 38-06-15.7 N KY NE 085-34-01.3 W 0003282641 LOUISVILLE METRO GOVERNMENT Louisville 01/10/2008 06093.45000 38-06-15.7 N IL NE 087-48-07.2 W 0003282959 Village of Niles Niles 01/11/2008 17905.00000 42-01-34.2 N IL NE 087-48-07.2 W 0003282959 Village of Niles Niles 01/11/2008 18025.00000 42-01-34.2 N IL NE 087-47-56.9 W 0003282961 Village of Niles Niles 01/11/2008 17755.00000
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279647A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279647A1.txt
      • NETWORKS, INSalida 01/14/2008 10835.00000 37-41-24.5 N CA NE 121-09-21.9 W 0003286569 METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS, INMODESTO 01/14/2008 11325.00000 37-37-41.6 N CA NE 121-27-45.1 W 0003286570 METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS, INTracy 01/14/2008 11365.00000 37-46-09.5 N CA NE 121-32-04.9 W 0003286571 METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS, INTracy 01/14/2008 10875.00000 37-44-02.7 N CA NE 120-58-38.0 W 0003286572 METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS, INEscalon 01/14/2008 10715.00000 37-47-32.0 N NC NE 078-49-01.3 W 0003286573 METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS, INDURHAM 01/14/2008 11245.00000 36-02-08.0 N NC NE 078-54-12.8 W 0003286574 METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS, INDURHAM 01/14/2008 10755.00000 36-03-33.4 N NC NE 078-40-53.4 W 0003286575 METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS, INWAKE FOREST 01/14/2008 10915.00000 35-59-51.2 N NC NE 078-44-13.3 W 0003286576 METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS, INDURHAM 01/14/2008 11405.00000 35-59-54.5 N NC NE 078-33-15.6 W 0003286577 METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS, INWake Forest
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279718A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279718A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279718A1.txt
      • Order (DA 07-5095) in the above proceeding. This Erratum corrects typographical errors to conform the ordering clauses to the substantive text of the Order. The ordering clause is now to read as follows: ``13. Pursuant to Sections 4(i), 302, 303(e), and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 302, 303(e), and 303(r)) and Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules (47 C.F.R. � 1.3), and under the authority delegated in sections 0.31 and 0.241 of the Commission's rules (47 C.F.R. �� 0.31, 0.241), IT IS ORDERED that Respironics' request for an extension of its waiver for the ActiReader device is granted, as described above, and conditioned as follows: Respironics, Inc. may manufacture and sell a maximum
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279767A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279767A1.txt
      • 118-21-31.4 W 0003296050 Fireline Network Solutions Inc. Los Angeles 01/22/2008 17960.00000 34-03-43.2 N UT MD WQHP346 113-16-33.0 W 0003296658 American Wireless, Inc. Toquerville 01/22/2008 10815.00000 37-17-22.0 N UT MD WQHP348 113-34-20.0 W 0003296666 American Wireless, Inc. St. George 01/22/2008 11305.00000 37-03-49.0 N UT MD WQHP348 113-34-20.0 W 0003296666 American Wireless, Inc. St. George 01/22/2008 11445.00000 37-03-49.0 N OR MD WAM33 122-41-01.3 W 0003297565 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD PORTLAND 01/22/2008 06417.14000 45-32-31.4 N Page 29 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OR MD WAM33 122-41-01.3 W 0003297565 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD PORTLAND 01/22/2008 06705.00000 45-32-31.4 N OR MD WAM32 122-54-35.3 W 0003297566 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD SKAPOOSE 01/22/2008 06110.75000
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279927A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279927A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279927A1.txt
      • numbering resource utilization statistics based on December 2006 data that carriers submitted to the North American Numbering Plan Administrator (NANPA), as well as other information. Tracking number utilization is one of a number of initiatives taken by the Commission to ensure that limited numbering resources are used efficiently. Summary Data Utilization Statistics by Carrier Type - Reporting carriers have over 1.3 billion telephone numbers. Of these, over 616 million were assigned to customers, about 691 million were available to be assigned, and about 86 million were used for other purposes, such as for administrative use. Following are utilization statistics by carrier type as of December 31, 2006: Overall, 44.2% of all telephone numbers were assigned to customers. The overall utilization rate
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279929A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279929A1.txt
      • provides services outside of the acquirer's operating region, the numbering resources are treated as CLEC resources. 14 Table 4 Telephone Number Utilization by State as of December 31, 2006 Assigned Intermediate Reserved Aging Administrative Available1 Total State/jurisdiction 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s Alabama 8,674 40.2 509 2.4 307 1.4 488 2.3 287 1.3 11,289 52.4 21,554 Alaska 1,357 25.5 28 0.5 31 0.6 68 1.3 29 0.5 3,806 71.6 5,318 American Samoa 18 90.3 0 0.0 1 3.7 0 0.7 1 4.0 0 1.3 20 Arizona 12,328 58.6 322 1.5 187 0.9 606 2.9 173 0.8 7,429 35.3 21,044 Arkansas 4,371 31.2 707 5.1 62 0.4 245 1.8 181 1.3 8,422 60.2 13,989
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279931A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279931A1.txt
      • Price-Cap Carriers 97.0 97.5 98.0 98.5 99.0 99.5 100.0 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Years Percent o f Co mmitments M et Weighted BOC/Embarq Composite* Weighted Verizon Avg BellSouth Weighted AT&T Avg. (excluding BellSouth) Qwest 17 ARMIS 43-05 Report 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 AT&T Ameritech 2.0 2.1 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.5 AT&T BellSouth 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.3 1.3 AT&T Pacific 1.3 1.2 1.5 1.6 1.5 1.6 AT&T Southwestern 2.2 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1 1.1 AT&T SNET 1.8 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 Qwest 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 Verizon GTE 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.9 0.9 Verizon North (Combined with Verizon South) Verizon South 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.3 Embarq (formerly Sprint) 3.2 1.5 1.4
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279991A1.pdf
      • (WAC) created five informal working groups to look at issues on the agenda for the WRC-07. In preparation for WRC-07, the WAC produced over 50 recommendations for the Commission. The various conference agenda items were assigned to the informal working groups as follows: Informal Working Groups (IWG) Agenda Items (Major WRC-07 Issues) IWG-1 � Terrestrial and Space Science Services 1.2, 1.3, 1.5, 1.14, 1.16, & 1.20 IWG-2 � Satellite Services including those related to High Altitude Platform Stations (HAPS) 1.6 (Resolution 415), 1.7, 1.8, 1.17, 1.18, 1.19, & 1.21 IWG-3 � International Mobile Telephone (IMT-2000) & 2.5 GHz 1.4 & 1.9 IWG-4 � Broadcasting and Amateur Services 1.6 (Resolution 414), 1.11, 1.13, 1.15, & 7.1 (Recommendation 952) IWG-5 � Regulatory Issues
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280031A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280031A1.txt
      • W 0003303362 Infinity Internet Vancouver 01/28/2008 19480.00000 45-37-47.8 N WA NE 122-26-14.5 W 0003303363 Infinity Internet Camas 01/28/2008 19360.00000 45-35-32.5 N OR NE 118-10-33.9 W 0003304004 Spectrum Networks LLC Umatilla 01/28/2008 19320.00000 45-59-23.0 N WA NE 118-17-25.5 W 0003304007 Spectrum Networks LLC Walla Walla 01/28/2008 17760.00000 46-04-41.6 N WA NE 118-20-21.7 W 0003304009 Spectrum Networks LLC Walla Walla 01/28/2008 17845.00000 46-04-01.3 N UT NE 113-53-00.0 W 0003304295 American Wireless, Inc. Santa Clara 01/28/2008 10955.00000 37-09-18.0 N TN NE 084-08-47.7 W 0003305399 METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS, INClinton 01/29/2008 05945.20000 36-04-41.5 N TN NE 084-07-52.0 W 0003305400 METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS, INKNOXVILLE 01/29/2008 06197.24000 35-57-10.0 N TN NE 084-07-52.0 W 0003305400 METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS, INKNOXVILLE 01/29/2008 10755.00000 35-57-10.0 N TN NE 083-55-49.5 W 0003305401 METROPOLITAN
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280033A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280033A1.txt
      • 43-05-25.0 N NY AM WHS574 076-11-15.0 W 0003296319 PUBLIC BROADCASTING COUNCIL OF LIVERPOOL 01/28/2008 00950.50000 43-05-25.0 N NY AM KTW41 076-11-17.0 W 0003296320 PUBLIC BROADCASTING COUNCIL OF LIVERPOOL 01/28/2008 00951.50000 43-05-23.0 N NY AM KTW41 076-11-17.0 W 0003296320 PUBLIC BROADCASTING COUNCIL OF LIVERPOOL 01/28/2008 00951.50000 43-05-23.0 N NC MD WII57 077-03-57.4 W 0003303956 WSFL LICENSE LIMITED PARTNERSHIPNew Bern 01/28/2008 00950.50000 35-08-01.3 N NC MD WHS537 077-03-57.4 W 0003303967 WMGV LICENSE LIMITED PARTNERSHNew Bern 01/28/2008 00951.50000 35-08-01.3 N AZ MD WSK92 112-04-27.8 W 0003304322 CBS RADIO STATIONS INC. PHOENIX 01/28/2008 00947.00000 33-27-28.7 N OH MD WLO588 083-31-42.0 W 0003304449 URBAN RADIO LICENSES, LLC Toledo 01/28/2008 00950.50000 41-39-13.0 N OH MD WPUY413 081-31-34.4 W 0003305056 BOARD OF EDUCATION, AKRON CITY SAkron 01/28/2008 00948.00000
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280187A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280187A1.txt
      • KNKA212 123-08-56.4 W 0003316112 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC FOREST GROVE 02/06/2008 45-33-03.4 N OR MD KNKA212 121-47-08.3 W 0003316112 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Government Camp 02/06/2008 45-17-19.4 N OR MD KNKA212 121-47-08.3 W 0003316112 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Government Camp 02/06/2008 45-17-19.4 N OR MD KNKA212 122-25-35.3 W 0003316112 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Gresham 02/06/2008 45-29-44.4 N OR MD KNKA212 122-33-01.3 W 0003316112 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Happy Valley 02/06/2008 45-27-17.4 N OR MD KNKA212 122-45-55.4 W 0003316112 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Hillsboro 02/06/2008 45-35-56.4 N OR MD KNKA212 122-42-11.3 W 0003316112 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Lake Oswego 02/06/2008 45-25-37.4 N OR MD KNKA212 122-37-00.3 W 0003316112 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Oak Grove 02/06/2008 45-24-57.4 N OR MD KNKA212 122-46-18.4 W
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280189A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280189A1.txt
      • STATE OF MICHIGAN, DEPT. OF TRANSPort Huron 02/05/2008 10795.00000 42-54-26.5 N CA NE 122-25-22.4 W 0003315045 City & County of San Francisco PUC Millbrae 02/05/2008 19320.00000 37-34-27.5 N CA NE 122-25-22.4 W 0003315045 City & County of San Francisco PUC Millbrae 02/05/2008 19440.00000 37-34-27.5 N IL NE 087-50-20.9 W 0003315771 District 230 TINLEY PARK 02/06/2008 19525.00000 41-34-42.9 N IL NE 087-51-01.3 W 0003315773 District 230 ORLAND PARK, 02/06/2008 17965.00000 41-36-55.9 N IL NE 087-51-01.3 W 0003315773 District 230 ORLAND PARK, 02/06/2008 18025.00000 41-36-55.9 N IL NE 087-51-21.0 W 0003315776 District 230 ORLAND PARK 02/06/2008 19585.00000 41-38-54.8 N MN NE 095-54-37.6 W 0003315958 Minnesota, State of Holloway 02/06/2008 06256.54000 45-20-27.9 N MN NE 095-54-37.6 W 0003315958 Minnesota, State of Holloway 02/06/2008 06315.84000
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280312A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280312A1.txt
      • 116-49-26.9 W 0003323397 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership Idyllwild 02/13/2008 10572.50000 33-05-31.8 N IA NE 095-23-06.8 W 0003323694 USCOC OF GREATER IOWA, INC. OAKLAND 02/13/2008 06785.00000 41-18-13.1 N IA NE 095-20-44.2 W 0003323716 USCOC OF GREATER IOWA, INC. HANCOCK 02/13/2008 06755.00000 41-23-47.1 N IA NE 091-22-54.0 W 0003323964 IOWA RSA NO. 12 LIMITED PARTNERSHMONONA 02/13/2008 06615.00000 43-02-35.0 N IA NE 091-11-01.3 W 0003323976 IOWA RSA NO. 12 LIMITED PARTNERSHMcGregor 02/13/2008 10632.50000 43-01-15.0 N UT NE 110-21-18.5 W 0003324237 Citizens Telecommunications Company ofHall's Crossing 02/13/2008 02115.20000 37-54-28.9 N UT NE 110-21-18.5 W 0003324237 Citizens Telecommunications Company ofHall's Crossing 02/13/2008 02165.20000 37-54-28.9 N CA NE 119-12-29.7 W 0003325978 TRILLION PARTNERS, INC. Farmersville 02/14/2008 21825.00000 36-17-43.3 N CA NE 119-12-29.7 W 0003325978 TRILLION PARTNERS,
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280613A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280613A1.txt
      • LLC Birmingham 02/28/2008 02025.50000 - 02109.50000 33-29-02.0 N AL MD KA74939 P 086-48-21.0 W 0003340465 NVT BIRMINGHAM LICENSEE, LLC Birmingham 02/28/2008 02025.50000 - 02109.50000 33-29-02.0 N AL MD KA74939 P 086-48-21.0 W 0003340465 NVT BIRMINGHAM LICENSEE, LLC Birmingham 02/28/2008 02025.50000 - 02109.50000 33-29-02.0 N AL MD KC4931 P 086-48-35.9 W 0003341646 FOX TELEVISION STATIONS, INC. Birmingham 02/29/2008 01990.00000 - 02008.00000 33-31-01.3 N AL MD KC4931 P 086-48-35.9 W 0003341646 FOX TELEVISION STATIONS, INC. Birmingham 02/29/2008 01990.00000 - 02008.00000 33-31-01.3 N AL MD KC4931 P 086-48-35.9 W 0003341646 FOX TELEVISION STATIONS, INC. Birmingham 02/29/2008 02008.00000 - 02110.00000 33-31-01.3 N AL MD KC4931 P 086-48-35.9 W 0003341646 FOX TELEVISION STATIONS, INC. Birmingham 02/29/2008 02008.00000 - 02110.00000 33-31-01.3 N AL MD KC4931 P 086-48-35.9
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280977A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280977A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280977A1.txt
      • numbering resource utilization statistics based on June 2007 data that carriers submitted to the North American Numbering Plan Administrator (NANPA), as well as other information. Tracking number utilization is one of a number of initiatives taken by the Commission to ensure that limited numbering resources are used efficiently. Summary Data Utilization Statistics by Carrier Type - Reporting carriers have over 1.3 billion telephone numbers. Of these, over 626 million were assigned to customers, about 629 million were available to be assigned, and about 87 million were used for other purposes, such as for administrative use. Following are utilization statistics by carrier type as of June 30, 2007: Overall, 46.7% of all telephone numbers were assigned to customers. The overall utilization rate
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281237A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281237A1.txt
      • Spectrum Resources, Inc Valparaiso 03/25/2008 00129.75000 30-29-00.0 N Page 3 AF - Aeronautical and Fixed State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City FL NE 085-40-58.1 W 0003371686 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Panama City 03/25/2008 00129.75000 30-12-43.5 N TX NE 098-28-11.2 W 0003371705 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc San Antonio 03/25/2008 00130.35000 29-32-01.3 N VA NE 078-08-40.0 W 0003371708 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Winchester 03/25/2008 00129.27500 39-08-36.0 N NM NE 108-04-22.9 W 0003371722 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Silver City 03/25/2008 00130.00000 32-38-11.6 N WA NE 122-15-28.7 W 0003372814 Kenmore Air Harbor inc. Kenmore 03/25/2008 00122.70000 47-45-24.9 N FL NE 082-37-35.0 W 0003376843 City of St. Petersburg Albert Whitted AiSt. Petersburg 03/28/2008 27-46-03.2 N
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281382A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281382A1.txt
      • W 0003384165 Cellco Partnership WEARE 04/04/2008 10648.12500 43-04-05.3 N IN MD WMN669 086-04-37.9 W 0003384187 GTE Mobilnet of Indiana Limited PartnershCASTLETON 04/04/2008 06034.15000 39-55-35.1 N IN MD WMN669 086-04-37.9 W 0003384187 GTE Mobilnet of Indiana Limited PartnershCASTLETON 04/04/2008 06123.10000 39-55-35.1 N IN MD WPJC420 086-13-37.9 W 0003384196 GTE Mobilnet of Indiana Limited PartnershINDIANAPOLIS 04/04/2008 06286.19000 39-49-43.1 N IL MD WQHP245 089-41-01.3 W 0003384247 USCOC OF GREATER MISSOURI, LLCTRENTON 04/04/2008 06004.50000 38-36-52.1 N IL MD WQHP245 089-41-01.3 W 0003384247 USCOC OF GREATER MISSOURI, LLCTRENTON 04/04/2008 06063.80000 38-36-52.1 N IL MD WQHP245 089-41-01.3 W 0003384247 USCOC OF GREATER MISSOURI, LLCTRENTON 04/04/2008 06745.00000 38-36-52.1 N IL MD WQHP245 089-41-01.3 W 0003384247 USCOC OF GREATER MISSOURI, LLCTRENTON 04/04/2008 10617.50000 38-36-52.1 N KY MD WMN566 084-17-30.8
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281566A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281566A1.txt
      • NETWORKS, INLEXINGTON 04/08/2008 11445.00000 33-58-43.3 N SC NE 081-14-04.8 W 0003388254 METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS, INBallentine 04/08/2008 06093.45000 34-08-32.7 N SC NE 081-11-12.7 W 0003388256 METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS, INIrmo 04/08/2008 10795.00000 34-06-48.1 N SC NE 080-45-49.9 W 0003388257 METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS, INElgin 04/08/2008 10915.00000 34-06-58.4 N SC NE 080-45-14.6 W 0003388258 METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS, INElgin 04/08/2008 11405.00000 34-08-49.8 N SC NE 081-18-01.3 W 0003388259 METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS, INLexington 04/08/2008 10955.00000 34-01-29.4 N SC NE 081-09-35.7 W 0003388260 METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS, INColumbia 04/08/2008 10995.00000 34-03-19.4 N SC NE 081-20-47.4 W 0003388261 METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS, INLexington 04/08/2008 11035.00000 34-00-17.8 N SC NE 081-20-19.3 W 0003388262 METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS, INCOLUMBIA 04/08/2008 11525.00000 33-54-09.5 N SC NE 080-59-58.7 W 0003388263 METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS, INCOLUMBIA 04/08/2008 11075.00000
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281713A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281713A1.txt
      • W 0003397319 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II Norcross 04/15/2008 10975.00000 33-54-44.3 N GA NE 084-03-32.8 W 0003397320 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II Snellville 04/15/2008 23020.00000 33-49-36.1 N Page 42 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City IL NE 089-45-41.3 W 0003397346 ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANMARISSA 04/09/2008 00928.29375 38-15-01.3 N IL NE 089-45-41.3 W 0003397346 ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANMARISSA 04/09/2008 00952.29375 38-15-01.3 N GA NE 084-11-34.1 W 0003397738 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II Alpharetta 04/15/2008 23020.00000 34-01-15.2 N GA NE 084-21-56.0 W 0003397739 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II Atlanta 04/15/2008 11305.00000 33-50-54.4 N GA NE 084-21-56.0 W 0003397739 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II Atlanta 04/15/2008 11425.00000 33-50-54.4 N GA NE 084-21-56.0 W
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281981A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281981A1.txt
      • N NV MD WMN555 116-16-14.3 W 0003423773 WWC License L.L.C. CARLIN 05/01/2008 06625.00000 40-43-06.7 N NV MD WMQ844 116-18-38.3 W 0003423775 WWC License L.L.C. EUREKA 05/01/2008 02162.00000 40-56-34.7 N Page 15 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NV MD WPJD342 115-51-01.3 W 0003423778 WWC License L.L.C. ELKO 05/01/2008 02171.60000 40-55-18.7 N NV MD WPJD342 115-51-01.3 W 0003423778 WWC License L.L.C. ELKO 05/01/2008 06152.75000 40-55-18.7 N NV MD WPJD342 115-51-01.3 W 0003423778 WWC License L.L.C. ELKO 05/01/2008 06197.24000 40-55-18.7 N NV MD WPJD342 115-51-01.3 W 0003423778 WWC License L.L.C. ELKO 05/01/2008 06226.89000 40-55-18.7 N NV MD WPJD342 115-51-01.3 W 0003423778 WWC License
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282120A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282120A1.txt
      • 05/07/2008 10875.00000 32-01-52.3 N TX NE 102-05-06.5 W 0003431175 Occidental Permian Ltd. Midland 05/07/2008 10915.00000 32-01-52.3 N GA NE 084-30-33.4 W 0003431203 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II, LLC Smyrna 05/07/2008 19575.00000 33-53-31.8 N GA NE 084-30-33.4 W 0003431203 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II, LLC Smyrna 05/07/2008 19675.00000 33-53-31.8 N GA NE 084-24-33.7 W 0003431206 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II, LLC ATLANTA 05/07/2008 19360.00000 33-47-01.3 N GA NE 084-24-33.7 W 0003431206 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II, LLC ATLANTA 05/07/2008 23025.00000 33-47-01.3 N Page 44 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City GA NE 084-24-33.7 W 0003431206 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II, LLC ATLANTA 05/07/2008 23175.00000 33-47-01.3 N GA NE 084-24-33.7 W 0003431206
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282121A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282121A1.txt
      • Antonio MTA, L.P. GIDDINGS 05/06/2008 06745.62500 30-11-08.8 N TX MD WPOR215 096-54-38.6 W 0003430272 San Antonio MTA, L.P. GIDDINGS 05/06/2008 06585.62500 30-11-22.4 N MA MD WLU797 071-19-11.2 W 0003430412 Cellco Partnership WESTON 05/07/2008 10735.00000 42-20-03.3 N MA MD WLU797 071-19-11.2 W 0003430412 Cellco Partnership WESTON 05/07/2008 10795.00000 42-20-03.3 N MA MD WPNK740 071-17-44.2 W 0003430514 Cellco Partnership Bedford 05/07/2008 10647.50000 42-29-01.3 N MA MD WPNK740 071-17-44.2 W 0003430514 Cellco Partnership Bedford 05/07/2008 10648.12500 42-29-01.3 N MA MD WLW562 071-19-23.2 W 0003430572 Cello Partnership BILLERICA 05/07/2008 10582.50000 42-33-59.3 N MA MD WLW562 071-19-23.2 W 0003430572 Cello Partnership BILLERICA 05/07/2008 10583.12500 42-33-59.3 N AZ MD WQCQ845 110-46-14.8 W 0003431165 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCTUCSON 05/07/2008 17970.00000 32-06-50.7 N OH MD WML463 082-47-02.9 W
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282268A1.pdf
      • and purchased equipment." Id. at 41 (citations omitted). Therefore, the Commission's continued emphasis on common reliance is hardly open to challenge. III. Comcast alternatively argues that it is entitled to a waiver under the 2005 Order, which the Commission now tells us (although it was not specific in 2005) was based on the Commission's general waiver authority, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, rather 9 1 Petitioners dispute this point, arguing that the 2005 Order was based on section 629(c). We would normally defer to an agency's interpretation of ambiguity in its own decisions, but it is unnecessary to decide this point since it really doesn't matter whether the Commission's 2005 Order was based in whole or in part on section 629. We
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282287A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282287A1.txt
      • 06152.75000 32-25-41.9 N GA MD WPOP887 084-48-38.8 W 0003434040 Southwestco Wireless LP GRANTVILLE 05/12/2008 06123.10000 33-14-13.4 N AZ MD WQHU216 111-00-10.3 W 0003434237 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC Amphitheater 05/12/2008 19575.00000 32-21-27.4 N AZ MD WQHU216 111-00-10.3 W 0003434237 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC Amphitheater 05/12/2008 19675.00000 32-21-27.4 N AZ MD WQID290 111-00-40.5 W 0003434278 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLc Amphitheater 05/12/2008 17760.00000 32-20-01.3 N AZ MD WQID290 111-00-40.5 W 0003434278 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLc Amphitheater 05/12/2008 17920.00000 32-20-01.3 N AZ MD WQID290 111-00-40.5 W 0003434278 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLc Amphitheater 05/12/2008 18015.00000 32-20-01.3 N Page 13 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City AZ
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282813A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282813A1.txt
      • - Selected Data of Holding Companies of Reporting Carriers as of December 31, 2005 - 2006. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Table 1.2 - Intercorporate Relations of Wireline Affiliates of Subject Local Exchange Carriers, as of December 31, 2006. . . . . . . Table 1.3 - Toll Service Revenues by Provider. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282830A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282830A1.txt
      • MD WQDH204 104-31-09.6 W 0003461771 OXY USA INC Carlsbad 06/03/2008 06665.00000 32-24-27.3 N TX MD WPQS202 098-12-31.0 W 0003461781 Guadalupe Valley Electric Cooperative, InCibolo 06/03/2008 00932.29375 29-34-42.7 N TX MD WPQS202 098-12-31.0 W 0003461781 Guadalupe Valley Electric Cooperative, InCibolo 06/03/2008 00941.29375 29-34-42.7 N IL MD WNEM581 089-12-55.3 W 0003461944 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MRT SHATTUC 06/04/2008 02181.60000 38-35-48.2 N IL MD WNEM306 089-45-01.3 W 0003461968 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MRT SAINT JACOB 06/04/2008 02196.00000 38-40-18.2 N IL MD WNTP518 089-59-58.4 W 0003461970 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MRT CASEYVILLE 06/04/2008 00953.20000 38-38-40.2 N IL MD WNEM303 090-13-31.4 W 0003461979 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MRT COLUMBIA 06/04/2008 02181.60000 38-27-35.2 N MO MD WNEM299 090-25-04.4 W 0003461984 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MRT BONNE TERRE 06/04/2008 02192.80000 37-56-12.2 N MO MD WNEM300 090-07-58.4 W 0003461995
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283198A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283198A1.txt
      • 06/17/2008 00130.30000 44-26-34.4 N ND NE 097-10-34.0 W 0003473483 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Grand Forks 06/17/2008 00129.95000 47-56-57.0 N OR NE 122-35-51.0 W 0003473485 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Portland 06/17/2008 00129.80000 45-35-19.0 N WA NE 122-18-33.5 W 0003473492 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Seattle 06/17/2008 00129.80000 47-26-56.4 N TX NE 098-28-11.2 W 0003473513 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc San Antonio 06/17/2008 00129.27500 29-32-01.3 N TX NE 100-09-44.3 W 0003473536 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Carrizo Springs 06/17/2008 00129.27500 28-15-46.3 N NE NE 100-35-31.5 W 0003473541 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc McCook 06/17/2008 00128.92500 40-12-22.6 N TX NE 098-28-11.2 W 0003473543 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc San Antonio 06/17/2008 00130.97500 29-32-01.3 N WI NE 089-40-00.4 W 0003473547 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Mosinee 06/17/2008 00131.60000 44-46-39.4 N NJ
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283201A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283201A1.txt
      • RI NE 071-23-08.4 W 0003471518 Town of Narragansett Pawtucket 06/13/2008 11365.00000 41-52-55.7 N NC NE 075-27-46.5 W 0003472119 North Carolina State Highway Patrol Rodanthe 06/16/2008 06595.00000 35-35-39.6 N NC NE 075-27-46.5 W 0003472119 North Carolina State Highway Patrol Rodanthe 06/16/2008 06635.00000 35-35-39.6 N NC NE 075-32-01.0 W 0003472123 North Carolina State Highway Patrol Buxton 06/16/2008 06795.00000 35-14-45.0 N CA NE 119-40-01.3 W 0003472361 Kings County Office of Education Hanford 06/16/2008 19520.00000 36-19-58.5 N CA NE 119-39-28.0 W 0003472399 Kings County Office of Education Hanford 06/16/2008 17960.00000 36-19-45.0 N CA NE 119-42-39.5 W 0003472478 Kings County Office of Education Hanford 06/16/2008 19440.00000 36-20-50.9 N CA NE 119-41-13.0 W 0003472593 Kings County Office of Education Hanford 06/16/2008 17880.00000 36-20-43.0 N VA NE 077-59-44.6
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283397A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283397A1.txt
      • 06755.00000 34-35-45.9 N SC NE 082-40-45.5 W 0003488185 Motorola, Inc. (Palmetto 800) ANDERSON 06/27/2008 06775.00000 34-35-45.9 N WI NE 089-47-47.6 W 0003488187 Bug Tussel Wireless, LLC Friendship 06/27/2008 10755.00000 - 11245.00000 44-05-15.7 N WA NE 122-21-51.5 W 0003488338 ACKERLEY BROADCASTING OPERATIOSeattle 06/27/2008 06815.00000 47-37-17.7 N WA NE 122-22-42.9 W 0003488364 ACKERLEY BROADCASTING OPERATIOSeattle 06/27/2008 06655.00000 47-33-29.2 N OK RM WIA690 095-45-01.3 W 0003486267 Public Service Company of Oklahoma dbaMC ALESTER 06/25/2008 06315.84000 34-56-47.2 N RO WPOP357 0003482373 HIGHLINE ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION 06/23/2008 RO WPOP355 0003482380 HIGHLINE ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION 06/23/2008 RO WPOP356 0003482383 HIGHLINE ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION 06/23/2008 RO WPOP822 0003482446 Iowa-American Water Company 06/23/2008 RO WPOP823 0003482447 Indiana-American Water Company 06/23/2008 RO WNEU886 0003483120 MIAMI DADE - WATER AND SEWER DE 06/23/2008 Page
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283398A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283398A1.txt
      • N CA MD WPTJ829 116-08-18.2 W 0003484759 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCBaker 06/24/2008 06152.75000 35-12-33.1 N IL MD WMQ580 090-41-05.6 W 0003484856 Cellco Partnership ALEDO 06/24/2008 06745.00000 41-08-49.4 N TN MD WMJ840 084-29-00.7 W 0003484858 Verizon Wireless Tennessee PartnershipSWEETWATER 06/24/2008 06286.19000 35-37-15.3 N TN MD WMJ840 084-29-00.7 W 0003484858 Verizon Wireless Tennessee PartnershipSWEETWATER 06/24/2008 06345.49000 35-37-15.3 N CA MD WQCI703 118-13-01.3 W 0003485564 Omnipoint NY MTA License, LLC LA CANADA FLINTR 06/25/2008 19415.00000 34-11-11.0 N AK MD WAT989 132-41-07.0 W 0003485626 ALASCOM, INC. MEYERS CHUCK 06/25/2008 06635.00000 55-48-56.6 N CA MD WPNN576 119-48-47.6 W 0003485911 Santa Barbara Cellular Systems, Ltd. SANTA BARBARA 06/25/2008 06363.40400 34-53-18.2 N Page 5 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283400A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283400A1.txt
      • STATE OF HOWEY-IN-THE-HIL 06/25/2008 06765.00000 28-38-45.9 N FL MD KGQ57 081-48-19.2 W 0003486256 FLORIDA, STATE OF HOWEY-IN-THE-HIL 06/25/2008 06785.00000 28-38-45.9 N FL MD WPJE725 080-33-37.0 W 0003486287 FLORIDA, STATE OF FELLSMERE 06/25/2008 06645.00000 27-49-41.0 N FL MD WPJE725 080-33-37.0 W 0003486287 FLORIDA, STATE OF FELLSMERE 06/25/2008 06675.00000 27-49-41.0 N IL MD WQFQ768 088-12-15.5 W 0003486291 PLAINFIELD COMMUNITY CONSOLIDATPLAINFIELD 06/25/2008 17765.00000 41-36-01.3 N IL MD WQFQ768 088-12-15.5 W 0003486291 PLAINFIELD COMMUNITY CONSOLIDATPLAINFIELD 06/25/2008 17820.00000 41-36-01.3 N IL MD WQFQ768 088-12-15.5 W 0003486291 PLAINFIELD COMMUNITY CONSOLIDATPLAINFIELD 06/25/2008 18060.00000 41-36-01.3 N Page 3 MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City IL MD WPXJ346 088-12-20.5 W 0003486296 PLAINFIELD COMMUNITY
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283520A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283520A1.txt
      • TRILLION PARTNERS, INC. Maricopa 07/03/2008 21975.00000 33-04-26.4 N AZ NE 112-01-43.4 W 0003493837 TRILLION PARTNERS, INC. Maricopa 07/03/2008 23025.00000 33-04-26.4 N AZ NE 112-02-18.3 W 0003493840 TRILLION PARTNERS, INC. Maricopa 07/03/2008 23075.00000 33-03-32.0 N AZ NE 111-57-00.0 W 0003493843 TRILLION PARTNERS, INC. Maricopa 07/03/2008 23175.00000 33-03-03.3 N HI NE 155-54-52.5 W 0003493875 Nextel WIP Licensing Corp. SOUTH KONA 07/03/2008 10578.75000 19-31-01.3 N CA NE 118-05-33.7 W 0003493898 Sprint Telephony PCS L.P. Long Beach 07/03/2008 18092.50000 33-47-14.5 N CA NE 118-02-07.0 W 0003493903 Sprint Telephony PCS L.P. Westminster 07/03/2008 19652.50000 33-46-24.8 N RO WPOP543 0003491592 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC 07/01/2008 RO WPOP544 0003491593 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC 07/01/2008 RO WPOP889 0003491608 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC 07/01/2008 RO WPOP894 0003491618
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284158A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284158A1.txt
      • WMK857 082-00-57.1 W 0003515462 Alltel Communications, LLC NINETY - SIX 07/24/2008 06093.45000 34-11-59.4 N AZ MD WQCU446 111-46-11.8 W 0003515551 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCMESA 07/24/2008 23130.00000 33-25-50.2 N Page 26 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City AZ MD WQFE250 111-43-01.3 W 0003515638 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCMESA 07/24/2008 21930.00000 33-24-53.8 N AZ MD WQFE250 111-43-01.3 W 0003515638 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCMESA 07/24/2008 21980.00000 33-24-53.8 N CA MD WLA271 119-02-23.0 W 0003515652 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership SANTA PAULA 07/24/2008 06256.54000 34-19-31.0 N AZ MD WQCY951 110-57-25.3 W 0003515814 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCTucson 07/24/2008 17890.00000 32-05-11.8 N AZ MD
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284160A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284160A1.txt
      • 11365.00000 37-09-05.7 N VA MD KJB64 078-11-43.0 W 0003511705 VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF STATE POWINCHESTER 07/22/2008 06785.62500 39-07-28.3 N VA MD KDU80 077-29-44.9 W 0003511736 VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF STATE POFREDERICKSBURG 07/22/2008 06565.62500 38-15-58.4 N VA MD WQCZ753 077-21-50.0 W 0003511742 VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF STATE POBowling Green 07/22/2008 06735.62500 38-04-47.8 N IL MD WQFQ768 088-12-15.5 W 0003511831 PLAINFIELD COMMUNITY CONSOLIDATPLAINFIELD 07/22/2008 17755.00000 41-36-01.3 N IL MD WQFQ768 088-12-15.5 W 0003511831 PLAINFIELD COMMUNITY CONSOLIDATPLAINFIELD 07/22/2008 17765.00000 41-36-01.3 N IL MD WQFQ768 088-12-15.5 W 0003511831 PLAINFIELD COMMUNITY CONSOLIDATPLAINFIELD 07/22/2008 17820.00000 41-36-01.3 N IL MD WQFQ768 088-12-15.5 W 0003511831 PLAINFIELD COMMUNITY CONSOLIDATPLAINFIELD 07/22/2008 18060.00000 41-36-01.3 N IN MD WQGT586 085-00-43.4 W 0003511834 East Allen County Schools New Haven 07/22/2008 11215.00000 41-03-48.0 N Page 3 MW -
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284321A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284321A2.txt
      • traffic. Table A1 shows that carriers reported 72.4 billion minutes of U.S. billed traffic in 2006, for which they billed $7.3 billion. Table A29 shows that 63.9 billion of these minutes and $6.1 billion of this revenue were for calls that originated in the United States or terminated collect or caller toll-free in the United States. Table A30 shows that 1.3 billion of these minutes and $0.3 billion of this revenue was for country-direct and country-beyond type services. Table A31 shows that 7.3 billion of these minutes and $0.9 billion of this revenue was for reorigination services billed to foreign carriers. Foreign billed traffic is all traffic billed by a foreign or correspondent carrier and includes most calls that originate at
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284492A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284492A1.txt
      • 23125.00000 40-50-26.2 N NY MD WQIN834 073-53-13.4 W 0003541052 Northrop Grumman Information TechnologBrooklyn 08/08/2008 21925.00000 40-40-34.7 N AZ NE 111-30-33.9 W 0003530595 EL PASO NATURAL GAS COMPANY COOLIDGE 08/04/2008 06630.00000 32-55-27.6 N MO NE 089-57-36.0 W 0003530596 Ameren Services Co BAKERVILLE 08/04/2008 00928.06875 36-13-28.0 N MO NE 089-57-36.0 W 0003530596 Ameren Services Co BAKERVILLE 08/04/2008 00952.06875 36-13-28.0 N PA NE 076-48-01.3 W 0003530621 CENTRAL DAUPHIN SCHOOL DISTRICTHarrisburg 08/04/2008 23135.00000 40-17-02.1 N PA NE 076-48-13.0 W 0003530622 CENTRAL DAUPHIN SCHOOL DISTRICTHarrisburg 08/04/2008 21935.00000 40-17-28.0 N MO NE 091-47-08.0 W 0003530645 Ameren Services Co PORTLAND 08/04/2008 00928.10625 38-44-25.0 N MO NE 091-47-08.0 W 0003530645 Ameren Services Co PORTLAND 08/04/2008 00952.10625 38-44-25.0 N MO NE 092-12-31.0 W 0003530686 Ameren Seervices Co JEFFERSON CITY 08/04/2008
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284656A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284656A1.txt
      • PROSSER 08/12/2008 06093.45000 46-19-18.4 N Page 16 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City WA MD WLT896 119-44-49.1 W 0003544048 USCOC OF RICHLAND, INC. PROSSER 08/12/2008 10875.00000 46-19-18.4 N WY MD WQCL808 107-51-56.0 W 0003544060 Union Telephone Company Worland 08/12/2008 06805.00000 44-04-01.3 N WY MD WPZJ561 108-12-18.3 W 0003544063 Union Telephone Company Thermopolis 08/12/2008 11167.50000 43-37-44.3 N WY MD WPTJ607 107-36-29.3 W 0003544066 Union Telephone Company Lysite 08/12/2008 11172.50000 43-16-38.8 N WA MD WLT897 119-19-19.0 W 0003544096 USCOC OF RICHLAND, INC. RICHLAND 08/12/2008 06226.89000 46-14-07.4 N WA MD WLT897 119-19-19.0 W 0003544096 USCOC OF RICHLAND, INC. RICHLAND 08/12/2008 06286.19000 46-14-07.4 N WA
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284667A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284667A1.txt
      • Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA MD WPUV826 117-14-55.9 W 0003546227 SAN DIEGO, CITY OF San Diego 08/15/2008 19015.00000 32-42-29.7 N MA MD WQFN296 071-04-30.3 W 0003546889 Boston, City of Boston 08/15/2008 11545.00000 42-20-02.5 N MA MD WQFN296 071-04-30.3 W 0003546889 Boston, City of Boston 08/15/2008 23125.00000 42-20-02.5 N MN MD WQAW725 095-44-01.3 W 0003548118 Minnesota, State of Slayton 08/15/2008 06615.00000 43-58-39.2 N MA MD WQGW431 071-05-50.6 W 0003548200 Boston, City of Boston 08/15/2008 17815.00000 42-18-54.4 N MA MD WQGW431 071-05-50.6 W 0003548200 Boston, City of Boston 08/15/2008 21870.00000 42-18-54.4 N MA MD WQFN295 071-01-43.8 W 0003548332 Boston, City of Chelsea 08/15/2008 19325.00000 42-24-03.1 N MA MD WQFN295 071-01-43.8 W 0003548332 Boston, City
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284856A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284856A1.txt
      • State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City AZ MD WQCY259 112-00-45.6 W 0003555690 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCPHOENIX 08/20/2008 23030.00000 33-35-54.0 N AZ MD WQBS686 112-14-28.1 W 0003555691 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCPEORIA 08/20/2008 18070.00000 33-40-32.4 N AZ MD WQBT376 111-58-21.2 W 0003555702 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCPHOENIX 08/20/2008 17770.00000 33-35-01.3 N AZ MD WQBS704 112-06-56.0 W 0003555708 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCPHOENIX 08/20/2008 18060.00000 33-34-06.4 N AZ MD WQBS704 112-06-56.0 W 0003555708 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCPHOENIX 08/20/2008 18120.00000 33-34-06.4 N AZ MD WQBS704 112-06-56.0 W 0003555708 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCPHOENIX 08/20/2008 23080.00000 33-34-06.4 N AZ MD WQBS704 112-06-56.0 W 0003555708 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCPHOENIX 08/20/2008 23130.00000 33-34-06.4
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284857A1.txt
      • Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City FL MD WNEW954 082-43-35.3 W 0003550465 PINELLAS, COUNTY OF SAINT PETERSBUR 08/18/2008 11245.00000 27-48-18.0 N FL MD WNEW841 082-49-29.3 W 0003550466 PINELLAS, COUNTY OF LARGO 08/18/2008 11365.00000 27-53-55.0 N FL MD WPOP817 082-40-13.3 W 0003550467 PINELLAS, COUNTY OF TARPON SPRINGS 08/18/2008 06286.19000 28-09-12.0 N FL MD WNEW846 082-39-01.3 W 0003550468 PINELLAS, COUNTY OF SAINT PETERSBUR 08/18/2008 11485.00000 27-46-43.0 N FL MD WPWA327 082-39-07.5 W 0003550469 PINELLAS, COUNTY OF ST PETERSBURG 08/18/2008 11325.00000 27-46-18.3 N WI MD KSI47 090-12-59.0 W 0003550576 WISCONSIN DOT, STATE PATROL MARSHFIELD 08/18/2008 05974.85000 44-31-31.0 N WI MD KSI47 090-12-59.0 W 0003550576 WISCONSIN DOT, STATE PATROL MARSHFIELD 08/18/2008 06034.15000 44-31-31.0 N FL MD WNES412 082-39-10.0
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284880A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284880A1.txt
      • 2 1 Page 2 Frequency Termination Pending Call Sign Termination Date Stn Class Licensee Name Lower/Upper Frequency City Latitude State Longitude Loc./ Path ## Ant. IG - Industrial/Business Pool, Conventional Mobility Division 07/19/2008 KUY548 FB CALIFORNIA STATE AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATIO 150.93500000 TRUCKEE 39-14-28.7 N CA 120-8-24.7 W 2 1 07/20/2008 WPBE801 FB ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND COMPANY 462.42500000 MEMPHIS 35-10-31.3 N TN 89-57-1.3 W 2 1 07/20/2008 WPBE801 MO ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND COMPANY 462.42500000 -- -- 3 1 07/20/2008 WPBE801 MO ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND COMPANY 462.42500000 -- -- 3 1 07/24/2008 WPKR979 FB2C American Trim 452.72500000 Sidney 40-17-10.2 N OH 84-10-36.8 W 2 1 07/24/2008 WPKR979 MO American Trim 452.72500000 -- -- 3 1 07/24/2008 WPKR979 MO American Trim 457.72500000 -- -- 3
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284924A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284924A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284924A1.txt
      • numbering resource utilization statistics based on December 2007 data that carriers submitted to the North American Numbering Plan Administrator (NANPA), as well as other information. Tracking number utilization is one of a number of initiatives taken by the Commission to ensure that limited numbering resources are used efficiently. Summary Data Utilization Statistics by Carrier Type - Reporting carriers have over 1.3 billion telephone numbers. Of these, over 639 million were assigned to customers, about 630 million were available to be assigned, and about 87 million were used for other purposes, such as for administrative use. Following are utilization statistics by carrier type as of December 31, 2007: Overall, 47.1% of all telephone numbers were assigned to customers. The overall utilization rate
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284926A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284926A1.txt
      • 515 2.4 259 1.2 10,779 50.0 21,576 Alaska 1,405 25.9 22 0.4 34 0.6 94 1.7 25 0.5 3,847 70.9 5,427 American Samoa 20 68.1 0 0.0 1 2.8 1 3.3 0 1.6 7 24.2 30 Arizona 12,889 61.9 356 1.7 179 0.9 645 3.1 204 1.0 6,566 31.5 20,838 Arkansas 4,809 33.8 569 4.0 68 0.5 278 2.0 191 1.3 8,297 58.4 14,212 California 78,028 50.4 4,910 3.2 638 0.4 4,237 2.7 2,735 1.8 64,223 41.5 154,771 Colorado 11,629 56.6 72 0.4 126 0.6 591 2.9 328 1.6 7,796 37.9 20,543 Connecticut 7,648 51.1 300 2.0 107 0.7 301 2.0 234 1.6 6,369 42.6 14,960 Delaware 2,564 55.7 19 0.4 77 1.7 111 2.4 27 0.6 1,802 39.2 4,599 District
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284929A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284929A1.txt
      • Q2 Service Provider Category 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Regional Bell Operating Companies 11.7%14.4%14.3%16.2%18.3%19.9%19.9%19.8%19.8%18.3%14.1%13.2% (RBOCs) Including CLEC Affiliates. Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers 2.6 1.4 1.5 1.7 2.1 2.8 3.2 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.1 2.9 (LECs) Other Than RBOCs Competitive Local Exchange Carriers (CLECs) Local Resellers and Other Local Carriers Other Than RBOCs 0.8 1.3 2.6 2.2 2.7 3.3 3.5 3.8 4.4 5.0 6.5 6.7 Total: Fixed Local Service Providers15.1 17.1 18.5 20.1 23.1 26.0 26.6 27.0 27.6 26.7 23.6 22.8 Payphone Providers 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Wireless Service Providers 3.3 5.1 6.6 9.2 12.0 17.2 24.8 27.8 29.2 33.9 38.4 40.7 RBOC Toll Service Providers 1.7
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
      • purchased by calling Best Copy and Printing, Inc., Portals II, 445 12th Street S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington DC 20554 at 800-378-3160, facsimile 202-488-5563, or via e-mail fcc@bcpiweb.com. The report can also be downloaded from the Wireline Competition Bureau Statistical Reports Internet site at: www.fcc.gov/wcb/iatd/trends.html. Table of Contents 1-1 1-1 Table 1.1Interstate Per-Line Access Charges...............................................................1-3 Table 1.2Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges............................................................1-4 Table 1.3Interstate Per-Line Access Charges by Carrier...................................................1-5 Table 1.4Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges by Carrier.................................... ......... 1-6 2-1 Table 2.1High-Speed Lines....................................................................................2-3 Chart 2.1Total High-Speed Lines..............................................................................2-3 Chart 2.2High-Speed Lines by Technology..................................................................2-3 Table 2.2Advanced Services Lines...........................................................................2-4 Chart 2.3Advanced Services Lines...........................................................................2-4 Chart 2.4Advanced Services Lines by Technology.........................................................2-4 Table 2.3Residential High-Speed Lines.....................................................................2-5 Chart 2.5Residential High-Speed Lines.....................................................................2-5 Chart 2.6Residential High-Speed Lines by Technology...................................................2-5 Table 2.4Residential Advanced Services Lines............................................................2-6
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
      • Rates............................................................................................I-1 A. Local Service Rates........................................................................I-2 1. Residential Rates.........................................................................I-2 2. Rates for Low-Income Households....................................................I-3 3. Business Rates............................................................................I-3 B. Standard Deviation Analysis of Residential Rates.......................................I-4 C. Toll Service Rates...........................................................................I-4 D. Additional Sources of Information on Local and Toll Rates..........................I-5 Table 1.1 Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas Table 1.2 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2007 Table 1.3 Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities, 1993-2007 Table 1.5 Connection Charges for a Residential Telephone Line in the Sample Cities, 1993-2007 Table 1.6 Comparison of Standard Local Rates to Lifeline and Link-Up Rates Table 1.7 Lifeline and Link-Up Rates in the Sample Cities Table 1.8 Average Local Rates for
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-285103A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-285103A1.txt
      • 37-01-23.6 N Page 14 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City VA NE 080-33-50.6 W 0003563014 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC Radford 08/27/2008 11365.00000 37-09-06.1 N DC NE 077-00-38.0 W 0003563016 airBand Communications, Inc. Washington DC 08/27/2008 22025.00000 38-53-49.0 N VA NE 080-43-01.3 W 0003563022 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC Dublin 08/27/2008 17760.00000 37-05-38.5 N VA NE 080-43-01.3 W 0003563022 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC Dublin 08/27/2008 17880.00000 37-05-38.5 N VA NE 080-43-01.3 W 0003563022 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC Dublin 08/27/2008 18000.00000 37-05-38.5 N VA NE 080-43-01.3 W 0003563022 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC Dublin 08/27/2008 18120.00000 37-05-38.5 N VA NE 080-46-52.3 W 0003563025 Conterra Ultra
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-285104A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-285104A1.txt
      • W 0003562975 LEBANON COUNTY OF Lebanon 08/27/2008 10621.25000 40-19-25.8 N PA NE 076-29-57.8 W 0003563043 SULLIVAN, COUNTY OF LAPORTE 08/27/2008 05974.85000 41-25-04.3 N PA NE 076-29-57.8 W 0003563043 SULLIVAN, COUNTY OF LAPORTE 08/27/2008 11245.00000 41-25-04.3 N PA NE 076-27-35.3 W 0003563047 SULLIVAN, COUNTY OF PA 08/27/2008 10755.00000 41-26-17.8 N PA NE 077-00-04.9 W 0003563051 SULLIVAN, COUNTY OF WILLIAMSPORT 08/27/2008 06226.89000 41-27-01.3 N WA NE 123-08-16.4 W 0003563712 Washington, State of; DOT Olympia 08/28/2008 11285.00000 46-58-23.6 N WV NE 079-34-38.1 W 0003564624 State of West Virginia, DHHR/BPH State THarman 08/29/2008 05945.20000 38-51-53.8 N WV NE 079-26-41.1 W 0003564669 State of West Virginia, DHHR/BPH State THarman 08/29/2008 06197.24000 38-53-55.4 N CA RM WNEO360 122-17-05.8 W 0003560417 EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICOAKLAND 08/25/2008 00928.41250
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-285239A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-285239A1.txt
      • Bladensburg 09/02/2008 11185.00000 38-56-28.8 N MD NE 076-28-47.8 W 0003565937 FiberTower Network Services Corp. Annapolis 09/02/2008 23125.00000 39-01-07.8 N MD NE 076-40-15.1 W 0003565941 FiberTower Network Services Corp. CROFTON 09/02/2008 10755.00000 38-59-20.8 N MD NE 076-30-26.9 W 0003565942 FiberTower Network Services Corp. Baltimore 09/02/2008 11215.00000 39-20-41.3 N IL NE 090-09-54.8 W 0003566091 USCOC OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS, LLC DAHINDA 09/02/2008 10557.50000 40-58-01.3 N MD NE 076-36-31.8 W 0003566192 Sprint Wireless Broadband Company, LLCAnnapolis 09/02/2008 10775.00000 39-00-36.7 N MD NE 076-36-31.8 W 0003566192 Sprint Wireless Broadband Company, LLCAnnapolis 09/02/2008 10895.00000 39-00-36.7 N MD NE 076-36-31.8 W 0003566192 Sprint Wireless Broadband Company, LLCAnnapolis 09/02/2008 21875.00000 39-00-36.7 N MD NE 076-36-31.8 W 0003566192 Sprint Wireless Broadband Company, LLCAnnapolis 09/02/2008 21925.00000 39-00-36.7 N MD NE 076-36-31.8
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-285407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-285407A1.txt
      • Detroit 09/12/2008 00130.15000 42-12-44.8 N MI NE 083-21-12.2 W 0003579350 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Detroit 09/12/2008 00130.80000 42-12-44.8 N FL NE 086-28-17.3 W 0003579352 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Destin 09/12/2008 00131.82500 30-24-00.2 N MN NE 093-13-18.4 W 0003579359 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Minneapolis 09/12/2008 00129.00000 44-52-55.0 N TX NE 098-28-11.2 W 0003579361 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc San Antonio 09/12/2008 00129.75000 29-32-01.3 N HI NE 155-02-54.5 W 0003579365 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Hilo 09/12/2008 00129.62500 19-43-12.9 N NJ NE 074-16-32.5 W 0003579369 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Caldwell 09/12/2008 00131.10000 40-52-33.4 N PA NE 079-51-37.3 W 0003579370 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Franklin 09/12/2008 00131.05000 41-22-40.4 N PA NE 078-53-55.3 W 0003579381 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Dubois 09/12/2008 00131.05000 41-10-41.8 N FL NE 080-17-26.0
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-285568A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-285568A1.txt
      • RO WNNU826 0003583286 WOOD COMMUNICATIONS 09/16/2008 RO WPDW924 0003585274 Morris Communications, Inc. 09/17/2008 RO KXX820 0003585986 VALOIS, PAUL 09/18/2008 RO WNLQ229 0003585987 VALOIS, PAUL L 09/18/2008 RO WPMN293 0003587467 ARIZONA WIRELESS & RADIO, INC. 09/19/2008 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City PA AM WQJI535 076-50-01.3 W 0003476476 EPEC COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATITROY 09/16/2008 00928.04375 41-44-33.4 N PA AM WQJI535 076-50-01.3 W 0003476476 EPEC COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATITROY 09/16/2008 00952.04375 41-44-33.4 N HI MD WQEJ645 156-00-56.9 W 0003581886 MAUI ELECTRIC COMPANY LTD Hana 09/15/2008 06645.00000 20-47-38.5 N HI MD WPYT761 156-14-40.9 W 0003581887 MAUI ELECTRIC COMPANY LTD KAHULUI 09/15/2008 06805.00000 20-46-21.5 N HI MD WPYT761 156-14-40.9 W 0003581887 MAUI ELECTRIC
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-285917A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-285917A1.txt
      • Interoperability Montana LAKESIDE 09/29/2008 06855.00000 48-00-38.8 N MT MD WQGT425 114-16-09.4 W 0003594807 Interoperability Montana BIG ARM 09/29/2008 05974.85000 47-46-25.1 N MT MD WQGT425 114-16-09.4 W 0003594807 Interoperability Montana BIG ARM 09/29/2008 06004.50000 47-46-25.1 N MT MD WQGS724 114-19-16.6 W 0003594810 Interoperability Montana KALISPELL 09/29/2008 06160.16000 48-12-46.3 N IN MD WQFV778 087-03-45.6 W 0003595118 Porter County Government Valparaiso 09/29/2008 19360.00000 41-28-01.3 N PA MD WQHR897 078-53-40.4 W 0003595538 Cambria, County of Johnstown 09/30/2008 17765.00000 40-19-43.1 N PA MD WQHR897 078-53-40.4 W 0003595538 Cambria, County of Johnstown 09/30/2008 17815.00000 40-19-43.1 N PA MD WQHR897 078-53-40.4 W 0003595538 Cambria, County of Johnstown 09/30/2008 17865.00000 40-19-43.1 N Page 2 MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-285930A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-285930A1.txt
      • traffic, various FEC, various data rates, various modulation 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 36M0G7W 50.27 dBW Digital traffic, various FEC, various data rates, various modulation 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 51K2G7W Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) E080218 SES-LIC-20080930-01263 E Class of Station: Temporary Fixed Earth Station Application for Authority Nimbus 9 Productions, Inc SITE ID: 1 LOCATION: SIS 1 1.3 meters ANTENNA ID: Intelsat uPod Micro 67.20 dBW PSK Video/Voice/Data 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 45M0G7W Points of Communication: 1 - PERMITTED LIST - () E080219 SES-LIC-20081002-01284 E Class of Station: Temporary Fixed Earth Station Application for Authority THE BOEING COMPANY Nature of Service: Fixed Satellite Service SITE ID: 1 7500 E. MARGINAL WAY S, CONUS, AK, HI LOCATION: PRODELIN Prod
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286037A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286037A1.txt
      • N NY RM WNHI413 072-46-10.4 W 0003607236 American Messaging Services, LLC MANORVILLE 10/09/2008 00152.48000 40-51-18.4 N NY RM WNHI413 073-27-42.4 W 0003607236 American Messaging Services, LLC PLAINVIEW 10/09/2008 00152.48000 40-47-48.4 N NY RM WNHI413 072-20-13.3 W 0003607236 American Messaging Services, LLC SAG HARBOR 10/09/2008 00152.48000 40-58-26.4 N MA RM WNKF980 072-42-14.3 W 0003607242 American Messaging Services, LLC AGAWAM 10/09/2008 00152.48000 42-05-01.3 N MA RM WNKF980 072-40-22.3 W 0003607242 American Messaging Services, LLC NORTHAMPTON 10/09/2008 00152.48000 42-22-29.3 N RI RM WNKF980 071-27-27.2 W 0003607242 American Messaging Services, LLC SOUTH KINGSTON 10/09/2008 00152.48000 41-29-50.4 N MA RM WNKF980 071-15-07.2 W 0003607242 American Messaging Services, LLC WALTHAM 10/09/2008 00152.48000 42-23-17.3 N Page 20 IK - Industrial/Business Pool - Commercial, Conventional State Purpose Call Sign
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286178A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286178A1.txt
      • WIRELESS INC. HOUSTON 10/15/2008 18115.00000 29-45-23.6 N TX NE 095-21-48.2 W 0003611328 NEXTLINK WIRELESS INC. HOUSTON 10/15/2008 18060.00000 29-45-23.3 N MO NE 093-04-28.6 W 0003611466 USCOC OF GREATER MISSOURI, LLCPOLLOCK 10/15/2008 06585.00000 40-21-21.8 N MO NE 092-10-20.3 W 0003611633 USCOC OF GREATER MISSOURI, LLCGREENSBURG 10/15/2008 06755.00000 40-17-20.7 N KS NE 102-01-18.4 W 0003611993 NE Colorado Wireless Technologies, Inc.Kanorado 10/16/2008 06286.19000 39-20-01.3 N NE NE 097-02-39.5 W 0003611995 NE Colorado Wireless Technologies, Inc.Schuyler 10/16/2008 06315.84000 41-27-11.7 N NE NE 100-38-33.7 W 0003611997 NE Colorado Wireless Technologies, Inc.North Platte (North) 10/16/2008 05945.20000 41-17-41.8 N NE NE 100-38-33.7 W 0003611997 NE Colorado Wireless Technologies, Inc.North Platte (North) 10/16/2008 06004.50000 41-17-41.8 N NE NE 100-30-03.2 W 0003611998 NE Colorado Wireless Technologies, Inc.Stapleton 10/16/2008 06197.24000 41-31-50.2
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286180A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286180A1.txt
      • W 0003613226 Confederated Tribes of the Coleville ReseKeller Butte 10/16/2008 19435.00000 48-04-27.3 N WA NE 119-18-34.1 W 0003613263 Confederated Tribes of the Coleville ReseOmak 10/16/2008 06286.19000 48-26-57.5 N WA NE 119-18-34.1 W 0003613263 Confederated Tribes of the Coleville ReseOmak 10/16/2008 19435.00000 48-26-57.5 N WA NE 119-31-31.1 W 0003613292 Confederated Tribes of the Coleville ReseOmak 10/16/2008 17875.00000 48-24-11.7 N WA NE 118-58-01.3 W 0003613302 Confederated Tribes of the Coleville ReseNespelem 10/16/2008 17875.00000 48-08-34.5 N PA NE 077-40-27.5 W 0003613728 POTTER, COUNTY OF ULYSSES 10/17/2008 11485.00000 41-59-45.7 N PA NE 077-39-22.8 W 0003613730 POTTER, COUNTY OF Galeton 10/17/2008 06034.15000 41-42-56.1 N Page 6 MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286200A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286200A1.txt
      • ID: NEWSSWIFT 1.5M 63.95 dBW Digital Video w/Digital Audio/Data 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 10M0G7W Digital Video w/Digital Audio/Data 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 10M0G7W Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) E080224 SES-LIC-20081010-01322 E Class of Station: VSAT Network Application for Authority INTELSAT LLC Nature of Service: Fixed Satellite Service SITE ID: 1 (M130-FL), VARIOUS LOCATION: SATELLITE INFORMATION SERVICES 1 1.3 meters ANTENNA ID: M130 39.90 dBW DIGITAL 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 110KG7W DIGITAL 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 110KG7W 60.00 dBW DIGITAL 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 13M5G7W DIGITAL 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 13M5G7W Page 28 of 55 64.00 dBW DIGITAL 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 27M5G7W DIGITAL 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 27M5G7W Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) 1 -
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286346A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286346A1.txt
      • #2 or TTY (202) 414-1255. Page 1 Location Termination Pending Call Sign Termination Licensee Name Location Date # City Latitude State Longitude Frequency Termination Pending Call Sign Termination Date Stn Class Licensee Name Lower/Upper Frequency City Latitude State Longitude Loc./ Path ## Ant. GM - 800 MHz Conventional SMR (SMR, Site-specific) Mobility Division 09/25/2008 WPHI224 FB2C ALLEN, DON 860.68750000 ALBANY 42-38-1.3 N NY 73-45-42.4 W 1 1 09/25/2008 WPHI224 MO ALLEN, DON 809.00000000-824.00000000 -- -- 3 1 Full License Termination Pending Call Sign Licensee Name Termination Date IG - Industrial/Business Pool, Conventional Mobility Division WQHN635 STRATEGIC MATERIALS, INC. 09/19/2008 WQHN665 RICHARDSON ISD 09/20/2008 WQHN700 STRUCTURAL CONCEPTS & COMPONENTS, INC. 09/20/2008 WQHN725 Metal Management Inc 09/20/2008 WQHN842 VAIL RESORTS MANAGEMENT COMPANY 09/22/2008
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286359A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286359A1.txt
      • 0003618928 Amoco Production Company 10/23/2008 RO WPZI262 0003620034 PALM BEACH, COUNTY OF 10/23/2008 RO KEA2 0003622908 CLARK, COUNTY OF 10/24/2008 AS - Aural Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City WV AM WPOS834 080-20-42.2 W 0003462876 AJG CORPORATION MOUNT CLARE 10/24/2008 00948.50000 39-14-06.1 N TX MD WHB796 095-31-01.3 W 0003624582 HISPANIC BROADCASTING, INC. HOUSTON 10/24/2008 00949.12500 29-42-06.1 N NC NE 076-49-45.0 W 0003618913 ATLANTIC RIDGE TELECASTERS, INC.Morehead City 10/23/2008 00950.00000 34-44-36.0 N TN NE 089-54-03.7 W 0003619293 CC LICENSES, LLC Memphis 10/23/2008 00944.25000 35-04-35.6 N ID NE 116-30-29.5 W 0003624396 FM IDAHO CO., LLC Nampa 10/24/2008 00950.25000 43-36-19.6 N CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286360A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286360A1.txt
      • Indians Tribal MANISTEE 10/21/2008 10855.00000 44-18-22.7 N MI NE 086-14-32.0 W 0003617411 Little River Band of Ottawa Indians Tribal MANISTEE 10/21/2008 17865.00000 44-18-22.7 N MI NE 086-17-51.2 W 0003617421 Little River Band of Ottawa Indians Tribal MANISTEE 10/21/2008 19375.00000 44-14-52.7 N MI NE 086-17-51.2 W 0003617421 Little River Band of Ottawa Indians Tribal MANISTEE 10/21/2008 19475.00000 44-14-52.7 N CA NE 119-40-01.3 W 0003617465 KINGS COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATIOHanford 10/21/2008 19600.00000 36-19-58.5 N MI NE 089-19-19.2 W 0003617475 Little River Band of Ottawa Indians Tribal MANISTEE 10/21/2008 11225.00000 44-14-51.0 N MI NE 089-19-19.2 W 0003617475 Little River Band of Ottawa Indians Tribal MANISTEE 10/21/2008 11265.00000 44-14-51.0 N MI NE 089-19-19.2 W 0003617475 Little River Band of Ottawa Indians Tribal MANISTEE 10/21/2008 11345.00000
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286553A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286553A1.txt
      • Fixed Point to Point Microwave Broadband Division 09/30/2008 WQDJ492 FXO Telink Networks S W, LLC 17840.00000000 Phoenix 33-29-13.2 N AZ 112-4-26.5 W 1 1 Call Sign Termination Date Stn Class Licensee Name Lower/Upper Frequency City Latitude State Longitude Loc./ Path ## Ant. GM - 800 MHz Conventional SMR (SMR, Site-specific) Mobility Division 10/02/2008 WPHE896 FB2 ALLEN, DAVID M 860.38750000 ALBANY 42-38-1.3 N NY 73-45-42.4 W 1 1 10/02/2008 WPHE896 MO ALLEN, DAVID M 809.00000000-824.00000000 -- -- 4 1 10/02/2008 WPHE953 FB2C ALLEN, CAROL J 860.56250000 ALBANY 42-38-1.3 N NY 73-45-42.4 W 1 1 Full License Termination Pending Call Sign Licensee Name Termination Date IG - Industrial/Business Pool, Conventional Mobility Division WQHJ666 Nice Mutual Water Company 08/15/2008 WQHP498 Northrop Grumman Information Technology
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286624A1.pdf
      • the date of the carrier's report"; but "[i]f no formal complaint is filed within the 6-month period, the complainant will be deemed to have abandoned the unsatisfied informal complaint." Id. � 1.718. However, "[a]ny provision of the [FCC's] rules may be waived by the Commission on its own motion or on petition if good cause therefor is shown." Id. � 1.3. review the record, we cannot conclude it was raised by necessary implication. Unlike MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. FCC, 10 F.3d 842 (D.C. Cir. 1993), cited by NET, where the FCC relied on an on-point but legally invalid rule in addressing the regulated party's argument (thus throwing the validity of that inadequate rule into question), id. at 845, NET's argument to
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286683A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286683A1.txt
      • W 0003637586 MidAmerican Energy Company NORTH LIBERTY 11/05/2008 00956.28125 41-44-36.1 N IA MD WPSE646 P 092-31-22.4 W 0003637598 MidAmerican Energy Company MONTEZUMA 11/05/2008 00956.28125 41-35-02.0 N IA MD WPSE645 P 090-27-06.4 W 0003638148 MidAmerican Energy Company DAVENPORT 11/05/2008 00956.38125 41-32-38.3 N IA MD WPSE644 P 092-19-36.8 W 0003638165 MidAmerican Energy Company DELTA 11/05/2008 00956.34375 41-19-26.7 N IA MD WPSD692 P 095-27-01.3 W 0003638588 MidAmerican Energy Company SHELBY 11/05/2008 00956.28125 40-30-58.3 N IA MD WPSD691 P 095-39-56.3 W 0003638620 MidAmerican Energy Company BATTLE CREEK 11/05/2008 00956.38125 42-19-17.5 N IA MD WPSD690 P 094-51-34.6 W 0003639078 MidAmerican Energy Company LYTTON 11/06/2008 00956.38125 42-25-28.4 N IA MD WPSD689 P 094-30-10.7 W 0003639255 MidAmerican Energy Company GUTHRIE 11/06/2008 00956.28125 41-40-38.4 N IA MD WPSD688 P
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286685A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286685A1.txt
      • N OH MD WPJA543 084-15-17.7 W 0003639996 MONTGOMERY, COUNTY OF DAYTON 11/07/2008 10558.12500 39-43-28.2 N GA MD WQJM230 084-18-35.8 W 0003639998 SPALDING, COUNTY OF Griffin 11/07/2008 06585.00000 33-13-12.5 N GA MD WQJM230 084-18-35.8 W 0003639998 SPALDING, COUNTY OF Griffin 11/07/2008 10705.00000 33-13-12.5 N GA MD WQJM230 084-18-35.8 W 0003639998 SPALDING, COUNTY OF Griffin 11/07/2008 10745.00000 33-13-12.5 N OR MD WQEV308 122-10-01.3 W 0003640008 Clackamas, County of BRIGHTWOOD 11/07/2008 11623.12500 45-21-00.9 N WA MD WQHI536 122-07-30.4 W 0003640012 EASTSIDE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNICHorizon Heights 11/07/2008 10955.00000 47-36-58.3 N WA MD WQHI540 122-06-42.0 W 0003640020 EASTSIDE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNICRedmond 11/07/2008 11445.00000 47-41-33.8 N IA MD WNEY977 093-37-34.8 W 0003640218 DES MOINES, CITY OF DES MOINES 11/07/2008 00928.28125 41-35-15.0 N IA MD WNEY977 093-37-34.8 W
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286734A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286734A1.pdf
      • the realization that we must recognize both the vast opportunities the internet offers-from economic to e-learning to e-health-and just as important are the risks and very real dangers which this viral and sometimes toxic connection allows. It's been nearly twenty years since Tim Berners-Lee invented the World Wide Web in 1989. This year, at the beginning of 2008, there were 1.3 billion Internet users worldwide-more than three times the total number of people who live in the United States. Brazil has 6.8 million broadband connections; Mexico has 5 million; Viet Nam has 1.3 million; China has 66.4 million; Canada has 9.2 million, and here in Switzerland there are 2.5 million. Even small, developing nations are making progress. I was recently in
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286830A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286830A1.txt
      • Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City GU MD WQGN431 144-45-21.7 E 0003645658 SORENSEN TELEVISION SYSTEMS, INCHagatna 11/12/2008 00692.00000 - 00698.00000 13-28-31.2 N CA MD WLG514 124-10-01.2 W 0003648877 BLUESTONE LICENSE HOLDINGS INC.ARACTA 11/13/2008 07075.00000 - 07100.00000 40-48-04.4 N OH MD KRN41 081-40-51.9 W 0003649131 IDEASTREAM CLEVELAND 11/14/2008 07025.00000 - 07050.00000 41-30-01.3 N TT - TV Translator Relay State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MT NE 115-16-51.0 W 0003649598 THOMPSON FALLS TV DISTRICT Thompson Falls 11/14/2008 00656.00000 - 00662.00000 47-35-45.0 N MT NE 115-16-51.0 W 0003649610 THOMPSON FALLS TV DISTRICT Thompson Falls 11/14/2008 00674.00000 - 00680.00000 47-35-45.0 N MT NE 115-16-51.0
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286834A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286834A1.txt
      • HARDY CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPSpringdale 11/12/2008 06605.00000 37-53-05.7 N Page 13 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City DE NE 075-37-39.0 W 0003646507 TELECOM TRANSPORT MANAGEMENTWilmington 11/12/2008 10865.00000 39-40-43.0 N CA NE 124-02-45.2 W 0003646646 CALIFORNIA RURAL SERVICE AREA #1EUREKA 11/12/2008 10626.25000 40-45-01.3 N VA NE 077-05-16.8 W 0003647991 AT&T CORP. ARLINGTON 11/13/2008 22060.00000 38-51-49.7 N VA NE 077-05-16.8 W 0003647991 AT&T CORP. ARLINGTON 11/13/2008 22080.00000 38-51-49.7 N VA NE 077-04-18.7 W 0003647992 AT&T CORP. ROSSLYN 11/13/2008 23280.00000 38-53-45.1 N VA NE 077-06-22.6 W 0003647993 AT&T CORP. ARLINGTON 11/13/2008 23260.00000 38-52-49.7 N MD NE 076-36-53.9 W 0003647994 AT&T CORP. Baltimore 11/13/2008 11225.00000 39-17-35.9
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286958A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286958A1.txt
      • W 0003653763 WWC License L.L.C. Carlin 11/18/2008 40-38-36.7 N NV MD KNKN214 116-16-14.9 W 0003653763 WWC License L.L.C. Carlin 11/18/2008 40-43-06.2 N Page 24 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NV MD KNKN214 116-18-38.3 W 0003653763 WWC License L.L.C. Carlin 11/18/2008 40-56-34.6 N NV MD KNKN214 115-51-01.3 W 0003653763 WWC License L.L.C. Elko 11/18/2008 40-55-18.7 N NV MD KNKN214 115-58-22.3 W 0003653763 WWC License L.L.C. Elko 11/18/2008 41-21-25.7 N NV MD KNKN214 115-37-49.0 W 0003653763 WWC License L.L.C. ELKO 11/18/2008 40-53-40.0 N NV MD KNKN214 115-59-57.2 W 0003653763 WWC License L.L.C. Eureka 11/18/2008 39-26-59.7 N NV MD KNKN214 114-17-47.0 W 0003653763 WWC License L.L.C. Proctor 11/18/2008 40-55-35.7
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286978A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286978A1.txt
      • listed:1 CC VIII OPERATING, LLC Grant of Authority FROM: Current Licensee: BLUE VALLEY TELE-COMMUNICATIONS, INC. CC VIII OPERATING, LLC Application for Consent to Assignment CC VIII OPERATING, LLC E080224 SES-LIC-20081010-01322 E Date Effective: 11/25/2008 Class of Station: VSAT Network Grant of Authority 11/25/2008 - 11/25/2023 Application for Authority Intelsat LLC Nature of Service: Fixed Satellite Service SITE ID: 1 VSAT 1.3M. (M130-FL), VARIOUS, 100 UNITS LOCATION: SATELLITE INFORMATION SERVICES 1 1.3 meters ANTENNA ID: M130 39.90 dBW DIGITAL 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 110KG7W DIGITAL 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 110KG7W 60.00 dBW DIGITAL 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 13M5G7W DIGITAL 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 13M5G7W 64.00 dBW DIGITAL 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 27M5G7W DIGITAL 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 27M5G7W Points of Communication: 1
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287093A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287093A1.txt
      • N FL NE 081-18-32.4 W 0003658185 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc Orlando 11/24/2008 00129.47500 28-25-45.8 N HI NE 157-55-20.7 W 0003658189 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc Honolulu 11/24/2008 00128.85000 21-19-07.3 N HI NE 159-20-20.3 W 0003658193 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc Lihue 11/24/2008 00128.85000 21-58-33.5 N IA NE 093-39-47.1 W 0003658197 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc Des Moines 11/24/2008 00131.10000 41-32-02.3 N CA NE 118-16-01.3 W 0003658201 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc Los Angeles 11/24/2008 00130.65000 34-02-06.0 N NC NE 077-56-14.3 W 0003658205 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc Greensboro 11/24/2008 00129.02500 36-05-51.9 N KY NE 084-36-21.2 W 0003658208 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc Lexington 11/24/2008 00131.05000 38-02-11.4 N MD NE 077-43-35.4 W 0003658215 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc Hagerstown 11/24/2008 00130.82500 39-42-30.6 N MN NE 093-03-37.2 W 0003658218 Aviation
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287094A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287094A1.txt
      • HEART UNIVERSITY, INC. Fairfield 11/26/2008 00946.00000 41-13-13.3 N Page 1 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NY AM 073-59-26.4 W 0003656874 Towerstream Corp New York 11/26/2008 21970.00000 40-45-21.4 N CA MD WPZE306 123-14-00.2 W 0003659008 Cellco Partnership UKIAH 11/24/2008 06765.00000 39-07-01.3 N CA MD WPZE306 123-14-00.2 W 0003659008 Cellco Partnership UKIAH 11/24/2008 10567.50000 39-07-01.3 N IN MD WLN517 085-43-17.9 W 0003659011 Cellco Partnership GOSHEN 11/24/2008 06063.80000 41-34-54.1 N IN MD WLN517 085-43-17.9 W 0003659011 Cellco Partnership GOSHEN 11/24/2008 06093.45000 41-34-54.1 N IN MD WLN517 085-43-17.9 W 0003659011 Cellco Partnership GOSHEN 11/24/2008 06152.75000 41-34-54.1 N IN MD WLN517 085-43-17.9 W 0003659011 Cellco
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287096A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287096A1.txt
      • 19425.00000 40-49-40.8 N IN NE 085-09-54.0 W 0003660228 NORTHERN WELLS COMMUNITY SCHOOssian 11/25/2008 17765.00000 40-52-55.2 N IN NE 085-09-36.0 W 0003660229 NORTHERN WELLS COMMUNITY SCHOBluffton 11/25/2008 17815.00000 40-47-13.2 N IN NE 085-09-54.0 W 0003660230 NORTHERN WELLS COMMUNITY SCHOOssian 11/25/2008 17865.00000 40-53-13.2 N CA NE 117-09-31.2 W 0003660478 Unified Port of San Diego San Diego 11/25/2008 23175.00000 32-41-57.3 N ND NE 096-47-01.3 W 0003660496 CLAY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENFARGO 11/25/2008 06581.25000 46-52-22.5 N ND NE 096-47-01.3 W 0003660496 CLAY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENFARGO 11/25/2008 10551.25000 46-52-22.5 N WI NE 088-00-06.7 W 0003660515 State of Wisconsin - Educational CommunLEDGEVIEW 11/25/2008 06815.00000 44-24-34.6 N WI NE 087-55-42.0 W 0003660722 State of Wisconsin - Educational CommunSHIRLEY 11/26/2008 06655.00000 44-20-51.5 N AZ NE 112-13-53.4 W 0003661396 Phoenix, City
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287116A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287116A1.txt
      • - 14500.0000 MHz 2M00G7W Points of Communication: C2SAT ESV - ALSAT - (ALSAT) C2SAT ESV - SATMEX 6 - (113 W.L.) C2SAT ESV - SATMEX-5 - (116.8 W.L.) E080218 SES-LIC-20080930-01263 E Date Effective: 12/02/2008 Class of Station: Temporary Fixed Earth Station Grant of Authority 12/02/2008 - 12/02/2023 Application for Authority Nimbus 9 Productions, Inc SITE ID: 1 LOCATION: SIS 1 1.3 meters ANTENNA ID: Intelsat uPod Micro 67.20 dBW PSK Video/Voice/Data 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 45M0G7W Points of Communication: 1 - PERMITTED LIST - () E980274 SES-LIC-20081010-01317 E Date Effective: 11/26/2008 Class of Station: Temporary Fixed Earth Station Grant of Authority 11/26/2008 - 11/26/2023 Application for Authority Journal Broadcast Corporation Nature of Service: Fixed Satellite Service SITE ID: 1 LOCATION: ADVENT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287238A1.txt
      • 12/03/2008 00494.00000 - 00608.00000 41-35-00.0 N IA NE P 093-38-20.0 W 0003666040 Meredith Corporation- Meredith Video SolDes Moines 12/03/2008 00614.00000 - 00698.00000 41-35-00.0 N MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA AM WQJR606 118-12-24.1 W 0003611000 THUMS LONG BEACH COMPANY LONG BEACH 12/03/2008 19370.00000 33-46-01.3 N CA AM WQAK868 118-11-37.7 W 0003611005 THUMS LONG BEACH COMPANY LONG BEACH 12/03/2008 17810.00000 33-46-06.2 N CO AM WQJR466 105-38-48.8 W 0003611658 UNION_PACIFIC_RAILROAD_COMPANYEAST PORTAL 12/01/2008 00932.40625 39-54-07.5 N CO AM WQJR466 105-38-48.8 W 0003611658 UNION_PACIFIC_RAILROAD_COMPANYEAST PORTAL 12/01/2008 00941.40625 39-54-07.5 N Page 23 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287240A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287240A1.txt
      • 11265.00000 33-56-54.0 N WV MD WQIM850 080-45-27.4 W 0003665455 State of West Virginia, DHHR/BPH State TGassaway 12/03/2008 06675.00000 38-37-18.6 N VA MD WNTQ316 077-32-37.9 W 0003665542 COUNTY OF STAFFORD STAFFORD 12/03/2008 05974.85000 38-24-13.4 N VA MD WNTQ316 077-32-37.9 W 0003665542 COUNTY OF STAFFORD STAFFORD 12/03/2008 06004.50000 38-24-13.4 N WA MD WNEU382 122-53-59.5 W 0003666348 WASHINGTON, STATE OF TUMWATER 12/03/2008 19600.00000 47-01-01.3 N WA MD KOJ37 122-54-40.5 W 0003667151 WASHINGTON, STATE OF TUMWATER 12/04/2008 18040.00000 47-00-44.3 N AZ MD WQJJ326 112-20-56.0 W 0003667232 Central Yavapai Fire District Prescott Valley 12/04/2008 19345.00000 34-35-00.0 N Page 5 MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City AZ MD WQJJ321 112-17-51.0
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287532A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287532A1.txt
      • W 0003682672 Alaska DigiTel, L.L.C. Anchorage 12/18/2008 19655.00000 61-06-22.9 N AK NE 149-42-59.1 W 0003682672 Alaska DigiTel, L.L.C. Anchorage 12/18/2008 23325.00000 61-06-22.9 N AZ NE 112-53-34.2 W 0003682958 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Gila Bend 12/19/2008 10795.00000 32-55-05.5 N NJ NE 074-25-26.7 W 0003683517 AT&T CORP. MILLTOWN 12/19/2008 11255.00000 40-26-47.1 N NJ NE 074-26-55.2 W 0003683518 AT&T CORP. PLAINFIELD 12/19/2008 11325.00000 40-36-01.3 N NJ NE 074-15-21.9 W 0003683519 AT&T CORP. LINDEN 12/19/2008 11345.00000 40-37-28.6 N NY NE 074-00-37.8 W 0003683520 AT&T CORP. BROOKLYN 12/19/2008 11385.00000 40-36-13.8 N NY NE 073-59-16.6 W 0003683521 AT&T CORP. BROOKLYN 12/19/2008 11345.00000 40-36-25.2 N CA NE 120-32-20.4 W 0003683625 Modoc RSA Limited Partnership ALTURAS 12/19/2008 06845.00000 41-21-46.1 N CA NE 118-23-43.0 W 0003683824 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS,
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287534A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287534A1.txt
      • WQIJ897 087-51-21.0 W 0003682645 District 230 ORLAND PARK 12/18/2008 19585.00000 41-38-54.8 N MD MD WPON915 077-08-57.9 W 0003682781 State of Maryland, MIEMSS Rockville 12/19/2008 05945.20000 39-04-59.4 N MD MD WPON915 077-08-57.9 W 0003682781 State of Maryland, MIEMSS Rockville 12/19/2008 06034.15000 39-04-59.4 N DC MD WQFK720 077-01-35.0 W 0003682782 State of Maryland, MIEMSS WASHINGTON 12/19/2008 06315.84000 38-57-44.0 N MN MD WQAW725 095-44-01.3 W 0003682816 Minnesota, State of Slayton 12/19/2008 06615.00000 43-58-39.2 N AZ MD KOO56 112-04-20.5 W 0003683402 PHOENIX, CITY OF PHOENIX 12/19/2008 06615.00000 33-35-08.1 N NC NE 078-35-50.6 W 0003676259 CITY OF RALEIGH PUBLIC UTILITIES DRALEIGH 12/15/2008 00928.30625 35-54-58.9 N NC NE 078-35-50.6 W 0003676259 CITY OF RALEIGH PUBLIC UTILITIES DRALEIGH 12/15/2008 00952.30625 35-54-58.9 N NC NE 078-29-23.6 W 0003676284 CITY
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287646A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287646A1.txt
      • PA NE P 079-48-24.8 W 0003684946 COLUMBIA GAS OF PENNSYLVANIA SMITHFIELD 12/22/2008 00956.26875 39-45-54.4 N PA NE P 080-24-35.3 W 0003684952 COLUMBIA GAS OF PENNSYLVANIA NEW FREEPORT 12/22/2008 00956.30625 39-49-45.8 N PA NE P 078-52-51.6 W 0003684960 COLUMBIA GAS OF PENNSYLVANIA LEWIS RUN 12/22/2008 00956.41875 41-53-43.8 N PA NE P 076-19-14.9 W 0003684980 COLUMBIA GAS OF PENNSYLVANIA DRUMORE 12/22/2008 00952.74375 39-47-01.3 N TX NE 098-01-22.0 W 0003685041 Lower Colorado RIver Authority Lampasas 12/22/2008 06560.62500 30-56-07.6 N NM NE 106-05-10.3 W 0003685132 Public Service Company of New MexicoEstancia 12/22/2008 06770.62500 34-36-33.5 N NM NE 106-44-09.0 W 0003685134 Public Service Company of New MexicoBelen 12/22/2008 06790.62500 34-39-34.2 N PA NE P 079-00-14.0 W 0003685311 COLUMBIA GAS OF PENNSYLVANIA CLYMER 12/22/2008 00952.25625 40-40-33.6 N
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
      • State Code Reference ............................................................................................... Table 8.5 Subscribership - Household - United States ........................................................... Table 6.1 Switch Downtime and Trunk Blocking ................................................................... Table 9.2 Switch Downtime Causes ....................................................................................... Table 9.3 Switching Systems .................................................................................................. Table 10.1 Taxes ................................................................................................................ Table 11.11 Telecommunications Industry Revenues by Service ............................................. Table 1.2 Telecommunications Industry Revenues - Total ...................................................Table 1.1 Telecommunications Revenues by Type of Carrier ..............................................Table 1.3 Telecommunications Revenues - Interstate ........................................................ Table 1.16 Telecommunications Revenues - Intrastate ........................................................ Table 1.15 Telecommunications Revenues - Total - by State ................................................. Table 1.13 Telecommunications Revenues - 2002................................... ................... Table 1.14 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs ...........................Table 8.3 Transmission Systems ............................................................................................. Table 10.2 Universal Service Program Requirements and Contribution Factors ..................... Table 1.10 Universal Service Support
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A11.pdf
      • Interval (hours) 5.5 3.1 5.0 4.5 3.6 3.5 4.5 3.7 3.8 LOCAL SERVICES PROVIDED TO RESIDENTIAL AND BUSINESS CUSTOMERS Percent Installation Commitments Met 98.4 96.8 99.2 99.2 99.7 99.6 98.9 98.1 97.9 Residence 98.4 98.2 99.3 99.2 99.7 99.6 99.0 98.3 98.1 Business 98.3 87.7 99.1 98.8 99.5 98.9 98.1 96.9 95.4 Average Installation Interval (days) 1.7 1.4 1.4 1.1 1.3 0.1 1.4 1.5 0.9 Residence 1.7 1.4 1.3 1.0 0.8 0.1 1.5 1.4 0.8 Business 1.8 1.4 1.8 1.6 3.1 0.5 1.4 2.0 2.2 Average Out of Service Repair Interval (hours) 21.7 18.0 30.9 30.3 21.6 16.3 25.1 39.3 22.4 Residence 22.3 19.8 32.1 31.2 22.2 17.0 26.4 44.3 24.0 Business 18.5 10.6 23.8 25.3 17.7 13.8 20.6 15.4 13.1
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A2.pdf
      • State Code Reference ............................................................................................... Table 8.5 Subscribership - Household - United States ........................................................... Table 6.1 Switch Downtime and Trunk Blocking ................................................................... Table 9.2 Switch Downtime Causes ....................................................................................... Table 9.3 Switching Systems .................................................................................................. Table 10.1 Taxes ................................................................................................................ Table 11.11 Telecommunications Industry Revenues by Service ............................................. Table 1.2 Telecommunications Industry Revenues - Total ...................................................Table 1.1 Telecommunications Revenues by Type of Carrier ..............................................Table 1.3 Telecommunications Revenues - Interstate ........................................................ Table 1.16 Telecommunications Revenues - Intrastate ........................................................ Table 1.15 Telecommunications Revenues - Total - by State ................................................. Table 1.13 Telecommunications Revenues - 2002................................... ................... Table 1.14 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs ...........................Table 8.3 Transmission Systems ............................................................................................. Table 10.2 Universal Service Program Requirements and Contribution Factors ..................... Table 1.10 Universal Service Support
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A3.pdf
      • corrections have been made based on supplemental filer information or as a result of audits. Nonetheless, disaggregated data are likely to be less accurate than industry totals. Table 1.1 shows the major components of telecommunications revenues for 1997 through 2007. This table was created by simply aggregating the revenues in the major classifications designated on Form 499-A. Tables 1.2 and 1.3 provide a look at annual industry revenues over time. Generally, Form 499-A revenue data can be tabulated in two distinct ways: by type of service provided and by type of business. Table 1.2 categorizes revenues by type of service and shows, for example, that carriers reported $115.3 billion in wireless service revenues for 2006. This total includes wireless service revenues
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.pdf
      • until after 1957. CPI All Items and CPI Telephone Services 1982 - 1984 = 100 0.0 50.0 100.0 150.0 200.0 250.0 19291933193719411945194919531957196119651969197319771981198519891993199720012005 CPI All Items CPI Telephone Services 7 - 6 1978 9.0% 0.9% 1979 13.3 0.7 1980 12.5 4.6 1981 8.9 11.7 1982 3.8 7.2 1983 3.8 3.6 1984 3.9 9.2 1985 3.8 4.7 1986 1.1 2.7 1987 4.4 -1.3 1988 4.4 1.3 1989 4.6 -0.3 1990 6.1 -0.4 1991 3.1 3.5 1992 2.9 -0.3 1993 2.7 1.8 1994 2.7 0.7 1995 2.5 1.2 1996 3.3 2.1 1997 1.7 0.2 1998 1.6 0.3* 1999 2.7 0.4 2000 3.4 -2.3 2001 1.6 1.3 2002 2.4 0.2 2003 1.9 -2.7 2004 3.3 -2.5 2005 3.4 0.4 2006 2.5 1.7 2007 4.1 2.1
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288105A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288105A1.txt
      • 01/12/2009 10875.00000 38-47-34.1 N MN NE 092-54-27.7 W 0003700229 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Woodbury 01/12/2009 23210.00000 44-55-07.0 N MN NE 092-56-48.1 W 0003700265 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Saint Paul 01/12/2009 18065.00000 44-54-52.6 N MN NE 092-56-48.1 W 0003700265 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Saint Paul 01/12/2009 22010.00000 44-54-52.6 N MN NE 093-31-25.3 W 0003700271 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Corcoran 01/12/2009 17950.00000 45-05-01.3 N MN NE 093-03-02.8 W 0003700283 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. CENTERVILLE 01/12/2009 11025.00000 45-09-03.8 N MN NE 093-03-02.8 W 0003700283 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. CENTERVILLE 01/12/2009 17970.00000 45-09-03.8 N MN NE 092-58-41.9 W 0003700314 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Hugo 01/12/2009 11515.00000 45-12-02.9 N MN NE 093-05-04.9 W 0003700317 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Vadnais Heights 01/12/2009 17890.00000 45-04-23.8 N Page 20
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288106A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288106A1.txt
      • KHNL/KFVE LICENSE SUBSIDIARY, LLCHonolulu 01/16/2009 13025.00000 - 13050.00000 21-19-28.7 N OH NE 081-40-29.0 W 0003710941 SCRIPPS HOWARD BROADCASTING CCLEVELAND 01/21/2009 13100.00000 - 13125.00000 41-30-12.0 N TP - TV Pickup State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City DC MD KK4428 P 077-04-45.9 W 0003707273 AMERICAN BROADCASTING COMPANIWASHINGTON 01/16/2009 02025.00000 - 02025.50000 38-57-01.3 N DC MD KK4428 P 077-04-45.9 W 0003707273 AMERICAN BROADCASTING COMPANIWASHINGTON 01/16/2009 02025.50000 - 02109.50000 38-57-01.3 N DC MD KK4428 P 077-04-45.9 W 0003707273 AMERICAN BROADCASTING COMPANIWASHINGTON 01/16/2009 02109.50000 - 02110.00000 38-57-01.3 N TS - TV Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TX AM WHY271 100-26-18.5
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288107A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288107A1.txt
      • N GA MD WQIY864 084-31-54.8 W 0003713735 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II Marietta 01/23/2009 19375.00000 33-58-42.2 N GA MD WQIY864 084-31-54.8 W 0003713735 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II Marietta 01/23/2009 19475.00000 33-58-42.2 N GA MD WQIY864 084-31-54.8 W 0003713735 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II Marietta 01/23/2009 19520.00000 33-58-42.2 N GA MD WQIY535 084-24-33.7 W 0003713737 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II, LLC ATLANTA 01/23/2009 19360.00000 33-47-01.3 N Page 19 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City GA MD WQIY535 084-24-33.7 W 0003713737 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II, LLC ATLANTA 01/23/2009 19400.00000 33-47-01.3 N GA MD WQIY535 084-24-33.7 W 0003713737 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II, LLC ATLANTA 01/23/2009 23025.00000 33-47-01.3 N GA MD WQIY535
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288234A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288234A1.txt
      • to the pre-grant notice and petition procedure of Section 309 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, that were accepted for filing. AF - Aeronautical and Fixed State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MO AM 093-11-58.0 W 0003706781 Branson Airport LLC Branson 01/28/2009 00122.95000 36-32-21.0 N NM AM 106-50-01.3 W 0003717001 Belen Alexander Airport Belen 01/27/2009 00121.50000 34-38-42.7 N NM AM 106-50-01.3 W 0003717001 Belen Alexander Airport Belen 01/27/2009 00122.80000 34-38-42.7 N GM MD WQFE681 095-35-12.8 W 0003720279 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Gulf of Mexico 01/29/2009 00130.77500 28-10-51.0 N LA MD KFB6 093-13-22.6 W 0003720283 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc LAKE CHARLES 01/29/2009 00129.10000 30-07-32.8 N LA MD KFB6 093-13-22.6
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288316A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288316A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288316A1.txt
      • transition will be messy regardless of when it happens. This is a message that I have been relaying for months now. For instance, at the end of January, Nielsen reported that 6.5 million U.S. households, or 5.7 percent of the total TV viewing population, are unprepared for the analog cut-off. While the Nielsen study revealed an improvement in readiness by 1.3 million households from its previous monthly report (when it was estimated that 6.8 percent of homes were not ready), it also implicitly tells us that not everyone will be ready regardless of when the cut-off date falls. We have no way of knowing where the unprepared are, and we will not know until the analog signals start to shut off.
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288533A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288533A1.txt
      • Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NH MD WMU779 071-32-00.0 W 0003732757 NEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC RADIO, INCOCONCORD 02/09/2009 00945.00000 43-11-33.0 N CA MD KSZ63 118-21-31.2 W 0003736886 BONNEVILLE HOLDING COMPANY LOS ANGELES 02/11/2009 00948.50000 34-03-44.1 N NM MD WHS531 106-39-12.0 W 0003737419 TEAM BROADCASTING, INC. Rio Rancho 02/12/2009 00949.00000 35-14-07.0 N TX MD WHB796 095-31-01.3 W 0003737823 HISPANIC BROADCASTING, INC. HOUSTON 02/12/2009 00949.12500 29-42-06.1 N Page 2 AS - Aural Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OH NE 081-26-58.9 W 0003731810 MARIETTA COLLEGE Marietta 02/09/2009 00945.50000 39-25-04.8 N TX NE 096-20-58.2 W 0003733237 BRAZOS VALLEY COMMUNICATIONS, LBRYAN 02/09/2009 00951.50000 30-39-01.7 N
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288534A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288534A1.txt
      • N PR MD WPSP492 066-05-01.6 W 0003738971 PR Wireless, Inc. CAYEY 02/13/2009 11627.50000 18-09-22.9 N PR MD WPSP492 066-05-01.6 W 0003738971 PR Wireless, Inc. CAYEY 02/13/2009 11631.25000 18-09-22.9 N PR MD WPSP492 066-05-01.6 W 0003738971 PR Wireless, Inc. CAYEY 02/13/2009 11657.50000 18-09-22.9 N PR MD WPSP492 066-05-01.6 W 0003738971 PR Wireless, Inc. CAYEY 02/13/2009 11685.00000 18-09-22.9 N CA MD WMJ298 118-48-01.3 W 0003739035 FRESNO MSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIPEDISON 02/13/2009 02165.20000 35-18-22.8 N CA MD WMJ298 118-48-01.3 W 0003739035 FRESNO MSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIPEDISON 02/13/2009 06109.51000 35-18-22.8 N CA MD WMJ298 118-48-01.3 W 0003739035 FRESNO MSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIPEDISON 02/13/2009 06125.57000 35-18-22.8 N CA MD WPNB549 118-58-52.5 W 0003739045 FRESNO MSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIPBAKERSFIELD 02/13/2009 06361.55000 35-20-23.2 N CA MD WPNB549 118-58-52.5 W 0003739045 FRESNO MSA
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288791A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288791A1.txt
      • W 0003743100 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHENDERSON 02/18/2009 21825.00000 36-01-41.6 N NV NE 115-03-50.1 W 0003743100 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHENDERSON 02/18/2009 21875.00000 36-01-41.6 N NV NE 115-03-50.1 W 0003743100 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHENDERSON 02/18/2009 21925.00000 36-01-41.6 N NV NE 115-03-50.1 W 0003743100 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHENDERSON 02/18/2009 21975.00000 36-01-41.6 N NV NE 115-07-40.6 W 0003743114 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHenderson 02/18/2009 11425.00000 35-59-01.3 N NV NE 115-07-13.7 W 0003743120 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILas Vegas 02/18/2009 19575.00000 36-01-36.5 N NV NE 115-07-13.7 W 0003743120 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILas Vegas 02/18/2009 19675.00000 36-01-36.5 N NV NE 115-07-13.7 W 0003743120 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILas Vegas 02/18/2009 23025.00000 36-01-36.5 N NV NE 115-07-13.7 W 0003743120 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILas Vegas 02/18/2009 23125.00000 36-01-36.5 N NV NE 115-05-20.8
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288968A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288968A1.txt
      • LINCOLN UNIVERSITY 456.82500000 39-48-38.4 N75-55-33.8 W 2 1 01/24/2009 WQFU686 FB2 Mad River Mountain Ski Resort 154.49000000 Zanesfield 40-18-43.3 N OH 83-40-27.6 W 2 1 01/24/2009 WQFU686 MO Mad River Mountain Ski Resort 154.49000000 -- -- 3 1 01/24/2009 WQFU686 MO Mad River Mountain Ski Resort 160.12500000 -- -- 3 1 01/24/2009 WQIF422 MO OSCEOLA COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD 466.58750000 KISSIMMEE 28-6-1.3 N FL 81-21-9.1 W 1 1 01/24/2009 WQIF422 MO OSCEOLA COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD 466.86250000 KISSIMMEE 28-6-1.3 N FL 81-21-9.1 W 1 1 01/24/2009 WQIF422 MO OSCEOLA COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD 469.86250000 KISSIMMEE 28-6-1.3 N FL 81-21-9.1 W 1 1 Call Sign Termination Date Stn Class Licensee Name Lower/Upper Frequency City Latitude State Longitude Loc./ Path ## Ant. MG - Microwave Industrial/Business
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288978A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288978A1.txt
      • Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City GA MD KSW213 084-12-02.1 W 0003753821 Stratophone, LLC Norcross 02/26/2009 00454.90000 33-55-06.7 N CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City VA MD KNKN908 080-15-57.0 W 0003752182 Cellco Partnership Stuart 02/25/2009 36-39-44.7 N VA MD KNKN908 080-20-01.3 W 0003752182 Cellco Partnership Stuart 02/25/2009 36-42-48.6 N IK - Industrial/Business Pool - Commercial, Conventional State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City VT AM WPSM226 072-11-56.8 W 0003711861 Central Vermont Communications, Inc. ORLEANS 02/25/2009 00157.74000 44-48-39.0 N Page 7 IK - Industrial/Business Pool - Commercial, Conventional State Purpose Call Sign
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289167A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289167A1.txt
      • Price-Cap Carriers 97.0 97.5 98.0 98.5 99.0 99.5 100.0 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Years Percent o f Co mmitments M et Weighted BOC/Embarq Composite* Weighted Verizon Avg. AT&T BellSouth Weighted AT&T Avg. (excluding BellSouth) Qwest 19 ARMIS 43-05 Report 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 AT&T Ameritech 2.1 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.7 AT&T BellSouth 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.3 1.3 1.4 AT&T Pacific 1.2 1.5 1.6 1.5 1.6 1.3 AT&T Southwestern 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1 1.1 1.0 AT&T SNET 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 0.8 Qwest 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 Verizon GTE 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.9 0.9 0.8 Verizon North (Combined with Verizon South) Verizon South 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.3 1.4 Embarq (formerly Sprint) 1.5 1.4
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289172A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289172A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289172A1.txt
      • numbering resource utilization statistics based on June 2008 data that carriers submitted to the North American Numbering Plan Administrator (NANPA), as well as other information. Tracking number utilization is one of a number of initiatives taken by the Commission to ensure that limited numbering resources are used efficiently. Summary Data Utilization Statistics by Carrier Type - Reporting carriers have over 1.3 billion telephone numbers. Of these, about 652 million were assigned to customers, about 619 million were available to be assigned, and about 84 million were used for other purposes, such as for administrative use. Following are utilization statistics by carrier type as of June 30, 2008: Overall, 48.1% of all telephone numbers were assigned to customers. The overall utilization rate
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289173A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289173A1.txt
      • 1,472 26.4 6 0.1 185 3.3 87 1.6 30 0.5 3,806 68.1 5,585 American Samoa 20 67.9 0 0.0 1 2.8 1 3.3 0 1.6 7 24.5 30 Arizona 13,075 63.0 98 0.5 186 0.9 707 3.4 211 1.0 6,483 31.2 20,760 Arkansas 4,981 34.7 486 3.4 68 0.5 302 2.1 168 1.2 8,333 58.1 14,338 California 81,155 52.4 2,019 1.3 896 0.6 4,532 2.9 2,818 1.8 63,320 40.9 154,739 Colorado 11,757 56.9 63 0.3 202 1.0 568 2.8 338 1.6 7,730 37.4 20,657 Connecticut 7,727 52.5 286 1.9 163 1.1 288 2.0 202 1.4 6,052 41.1 14,719 Delaware 2,589 56.8 14 0.3 76 1.7 110 2.4 29 0.6 1,743 38.2 4,560 District of Columbia 4,272 74.0 8 0.1 136 2.4
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289731A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289731A1.txt
      • TOLEDO 03/23/2009 00931.93750 41-39-01.1 N OH RM KNKG783 083-32-04.7 W 0003782606 Bell Industries, Inc. TOLEDO 03/23/2009 00931.93750 41-39-02.1 N AZ RM KNKG783 110-58-16.3 W 0003782606 Bell Industries, Inc. TUCSON 03/23/2009 00931.93750 32-13-20.2 N Page 12 CD - Paging and Radiotelephone State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City AZ RM KNKG783 111-07-01.3 W 0003782606 Bell Industries, Inc. TUCSON 03/23/2009 00931.93750 32-14-56.2 N CA RM KNKG783 119-13-44.3 W 0003782606 Bell Industries, Inc. VENTURA 03/23/2009 00928.88750 34-18-10.0 N CA RM KNKG783 119-13-49.3 W 0003782606 Bell Industries, Inc. VENTURA 03/23/2009 00931.93750 34-18-10.0 N HI RM KNKG783 157-40-43.1 W 0003782606 Bell Industries, Inc. WAIMANALO 03/23/2009 00931.93750 21-19-11.5 N DC RM KNKG783 077-01-34.9 W 0003782606 Bell Industries,
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289859A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289859A1.txt
      • San Francisco 04/02/2009 19520.00000 37-47-55.2 N IL NE 087-57-15.0 W 0003795549 Towerstream Corp Chicago 04/02/2009 10715.00000 41-51-29.0 N IL NE 087-57-15.0 W 0003795549 Towerstream Corp Chicago 04/02/2009 11185.00000 41-51-29.0 N IL NE 091-15-52.0 W 0003795576 TMP CORPORATION PAYSON 04/02/2009 10795.00000 39-49-44.0 N TX NE 095-49-39.0 W 0003795676 GTE Mobilnet of South Texas Limited PartROSENBURG 04/02/2009 06123.10000 29-31-32.2 N MN NE 093-08-01.3 W 0003795695 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. St. Paul 04/02/2009 23380.00000 44-56-24.0 N MN NE 093-11-40.6 W 0003795770 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. BLAINE 04/02/2009 18025.00000 45-09-21.3 N Page 25 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MN NE 093-11-40.6 W 0003795770 Telecom
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289860A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289860A1.txt
      • 06286.19000 36-05-04.3 N TN MD WCF330 083-28-42.6 W 0003796647 NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPJEFFERSON CITY 04/03/2009 06615.00000 36-05-04.3 N TN MD WCF330 083-28-42.6 W 0003796647 NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPJEFFERSON CITY 04/03/2009 06695.00000 36-05-04.3 N TN MD WCF330 083-28-42.6 W 0003796647 NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPJEFFERSON CITY 04/03/2009 06706.25000 36-05-04.3 N TN MD KBR70 083-49-29.6 W 0003796669 NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPKNOXVILLE 04/03/2009 06034.15000 36-02-01.3 N TN MD KBR70 083-49-29.6 W 0003796669 NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPKNOXVILLE 04/03/2009 06755.00000 36-02-01.3 N TN MD KBR70 083-49-29.6 W 0003796669 NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPKNOXVILLE 04/03/2009 06835.00000 36-02-01.3 N TN MD KBR70 083-49-29.6 W 0003796669 NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPKNOXVILLE 04/03/2009 06855.00000 36-02-01.3 N PA NE 078-44-32.0 W 0003796211 Last Mile Inc. dba Sting CommunicationsEbensburg 04/03/2009 23035.00000 40-29-27.1 N ND NE
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290060A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290060A1.txt
      • W 0003803008 USCOC NEBRASKA/KANSAS, LLC LEIGH 04/09/2009 06785.00000 41-41-32.2 N NM NE 108-44-31.6 W 0003803117 Smith Bagley Inc DBA Cellular One NE ArGallup 04/09/2009 17765.00000 35-29-11.2 N NM NE 108-44-31.6 W 0003803117 Smith Bagley Inc DBA Cellular One NE ArGallup 04/09/2009 17965.00000 35-29-11.2 N NM NE 108-44-01.7 W 0003803138 Smith Bagley Inc DBA Cellular One of NE Gallup 04/09/2009 19325.00000 35-31-01.3 N AZ NE 109-05-46.1 W 0003803511 Smith Bagley Inc DBA Cellular One of NE Red Valley 04/09/2009 10755.00000 36-27-39.5 N NY NE 073-39-39.2 W 0003803514 AT&T CORP. LONG BEACH 04/09/2009 10735.00000 40-35-17.7 N NY NE 073-38-36.5 W 0003803515 AT&T CORP. LONG BEACH 04/09/2009 10775.00000 40-35-02.0 N NY NE 073-29-37.6 W 0003803518 AT&T CORP. SEAFORD 04/09/2009 11355.00000 40-40-25.6 N NY NE
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290274A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290274A1.txt
      • Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TN AM WED442 086-22-48.1 W 0003799831 TEXAS EASTERN COMMUNICATIONS IGLADEVILLE 04/17/2009 06835.00000 36-09-13.5 N TN AM WED442 086-22-48.1 W 0003799831 TEXAS EASTERN COMMUNICATIONS IGLADEVILLE 04/17/2009 10915.00000 36-09-13.5 N TN AM WED441 086-41-40.8 W 0003799878 TEXAS EASTERN COMMUNICATIONS IALLISONA 04/17/2009 05945.20000 35-44-01.3 N TN AM WED441 086-41-40.8 W 0003799878 TEXAS EASTERN COMMUNICATIONS IALLISONA 04/17/2009 06034.15000 35-44-01.3 N TN AM WED441 086-41-40.8 W 0003799878 TEXAS EASTERN COMMUNICATIONS IALLISONA 04/17/2009 06675.00000 35-44-01.3 N TN AM WEG823 087-01-40.0 W 0003799900 TEXAS EASTERN COMMUNICATIONS ICOLUMBIA 04/16/2009 06286.19000 35-29-16.2 N TN AM WEG823 087-01-40.0 W 0003799900 TEXAS EASTERN COMMUNICATIONS ICOLUMBIA 04/16/2009 06345.49000 35-29-16.2 N TN AM WEG827
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290275A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290275A1.txt
      • N NJ MD WQHL431 075-21-32.0 W 0003810457 SECOM NET WOODSTOWN 04/17/2009 06590.62500 39-37-47.0 N NJ MD WQHL431 075-21-32.0 W 0003810457 SECOM NET WOODSTOWN 04/17/2009 06795.00000 39-37-47.0 N NJ MD WQHL431 075-21-32.0 W 0003810457 SECOM NET WOODSTOWN 04/17/2009 06855.00000 39-37-47.0 N FL MD WQEE434 080-22-50.6 W 0003810964 St. Lucie County Fire District Port St. Lucie 04/17/2009 11115.00000 27-22-21.2 N CA NE 119-40-01.3 W 0003806517 KINGS COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATIOHanford 04/14/2009 19475.00000 36-19-58.5 N CA NE 119-46-47.1 W 0003806581 KINGFS COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATILemoore 04/14/2009 17915.00000 36-14-39.1 N CA NE 119-40-01.3 W 0003806679 KINGS COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATIOHanford 04/14/2009 19475.00000 36-19-58.5 N CA NE 119-46-47.1 W 0003807496 KINGS COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATIOLemoore 04/14/2009 17915.00000 36-14-39.1 N CA NE 119-40-01.3 W 0003807594 KINGS COUNTY
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290424A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290424A1.txt
      • 120-02-02.2 W 0003814745 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC CHELAN 04/22/2009 10551.25000 47-48-24.4 N WA MD WMT201 120-02-02.2 W 0003814745 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC CHELAN 04/22/2009 11035.00000 47-48-24.4 N WA MD WMT201 120-02-02.2 W 0003814745 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC CHELAN 04/22/2009 11177.50000 47-48-24.4 N WA MD WQKE640 120-04-07.6 W 0003814768 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Waterville 04/22/2009 11667.50000 47-38-08.6 N OR MD WLV411 123-00-01.3 W 0003814784 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC SPRINGFIELD 04/22/2009 06152.75000 44-06-56.4 N OR MD WLV411 123-00-01.3 W 0003814784 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC SPRINGFIELD 04/22/2009 06625.00000 44-06-56.4 N Page 16 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OR MD WLV411 123-00-01.3 W 0003814784
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290425A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290425A1.txt
      • Avondale 04/22/2009 17900.00000 33-24-01.2 N AZ NE 112-19-30.0 W 0003815374 City of Avondale Avondale 04/22/2009 17980.00000 33-29-29.6 N AZ NE 112-19-30.0 W 0003815374 City of Avondale Avondale 04/22/2009 18060.00000 33-29-29.6 N AZ NE 112-18-24.7 W 0003815375 City of Avondale Avondale 04/22/2009 19460.00000 33-25-42.5 N OR NE 118-57-41.5 W 0003815748 Frontier TeleNet Canyon City, OR 04/22/2009 23025.00000 44-22-37.8 N OR NE 118-57-01.3 W 0003815749 Frontier TeleNet Canyon City, OR 04/22/2009 21825.00000 44-23-14.3 N ID NE 116-32-42.6 W 0003816058 KOOTENAI COUNTY Harrison 04/23/2009 06093.45000 47-35-18.6 N ID NE 116-57-15.1 W 0003816061 KOOTENAI COUNTY Near Blanchard 04/23/2009 06152.75000 48-04-43.6 N CA NE 116-13-32.1 W 0003816156 PALM SPRINGS, CITY OF INDIO 04/23/2009 10563.12500 33-48-05.1 N CA NE 116-13-32.1 W 0003816156 PALM SPRINGS, CITY OF INDIO
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290575A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290575A1.txt
      • 04/30/2009 11305.00000 45-08-10.0 N MN MD WQJT405 093-14-20.0 W 0003823420 Nextera Wireless, LLC Blaine 04/30/2009 11345.00000 45-08-10.0 N MN MD WQJT405 093-14-20.0 W 0003823420 Nextera Wireless, LLC Blaine 04/30/2009 19375.00000 45-08-10.0 N MN MD WQJT405 093-14-20.0 W 0003823420 Nextera Wireless, LLC Blaine 04/30/2009 19475.00000 45-08-10.0 N IL MD WQJK916 090-09-54.8 W 0003823643 USCOC OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS, LLC DAHINDA 04/30/2009 10552.50000 40-58-01.3 N IL MD WQJK916 090-09-54.8 W 0003823643 USCOC OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS, LLC DAHINDA 04/30/2009 10557.50000 40-58-01.3 N GM MD WQBJ313 090-22-48.2 W 0003823654 Stratos Offshore Services Company Offshore 04/30/2009 06093.45000 28-30-35.8 N GM MD WPNA687 091-44-20.4 W 0003823659 Stratos Offshore Services Company OFFSHORE 04/30/2009 06063.80000 28-48-50.8 N GM MD WPNE425 091-12-23.3 W 0003823661 Stratos Offshore Services Company OFFSHORE 04/30/2009 06004.50000
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291143A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291143A1.txt
      • State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TN NE 084-27-08.8 W 0003849030 CITY OF CHATTANOOGA Etowah 05/26/2009 05974.85000 35-19-29.4 N TN NE 084-27-08.8 W 0003849030 CITY OF CHATTANOOGA Etowah 05/26/2009 06123.10000 35-19-29.4 N CA NE 119-42-24.3 W 0003849343 Kings County Office of Education Armona 05/26/2009 17875.00000 36-18-43.4 N CA NE 119-40-01.3 W 0003849373 Kings County Office of Education Hanford 05/26/2009 19435.00000 36-19-58.5 N CA NE 119-47-22.1 W 0003849493 Kings County Office of Education Lemoore 05/26/2009 19620.00000 36-17-48.0 N TX NE 098-24-35.1 W 0003849500 City Public Service SAN ANTONIO 05/26/2009 00928.00625 29-34-48.8 N TX NE 098-24-35.1 W 0003849500 City Public Service SAN ANTONIO 05/26/2009 00952.00625 29-34-48.8 N CA NE 119-46-47.1 W 0003849513
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291144A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291144A1.txt
      • - Aural Intercity Relay State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CT NE 072-01-25.0 W 0003850924 RED WOLF BROADCASTING CORPORALedyard 05/27/2009 00947.00000 41-27-43.2 N AS - Aural Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OR MD WPZF330 122-34-01.3 W 0003848943 CITICASTERS LICENSES, INC. CLACKAMAS 05/26/2009 00944.50000 45-25-15.0 N WA MD WLI699 122-22-31.4 W 0003849766 AMFM TEXAS LICENSES LIMITED PARTSEATTLE 05/26/2009 00946.50000 47-33-57.3 N OK MD WDT908 096-23-28.7 W 0003850176 BIG CHIEF BROADCASTING CO. OF BRBRISTOW 05/27/2009 00950.00000 35-50-19.2 N AZ MD WMU806 111-36-50.0 W 0003851218 GRENAX BROADCASTING II, LLC FLAGSTAFF 05/27/2009 00950.50000 35-12-42.3 N AZ MD WMU806 111-36-50.0
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291145A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291145A1.txt
      • WQIR891 084-23-28.1 W 0003851466 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II, LLC ATLANTA 05/28/2009 18065.00000 33-47-56.1 N GA MD WQIR891 084-23-28.1 W 0003851466 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II, LLC ATLANTA 05/28/2009 23025.00000 33-47-56.1 N GA MD WQIR891 084-23-28.1 W 0003851466 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II, LLC ATLANTA 05/28/2009 23125.00000 33-47-56.1 N GA MD WQIY535 084-24-33.7 W 0003851467 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II, LLC ATLANTA 05/28/2009 19360.00000 33-47-01.3 N GA MD WQIY535 084-24-33.7 W 0003851467 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II, LLC ATLANTA 05/28/2009 19400.00000 33-47-01.3 N GA MD WQIY535 084-24-33.7 W 0003851467 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II, LLC ATLANTA 05/28/2009 19525.00000 33-47-01.3 N GA MD WQIY535 084-24-33.7 W 0003851467 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II, LLC ATLANTA 05/28/2009 19625.00000 33-47-01.3 N GA MD WQIY535 084-24-33.7 W 0003851467 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II, LLC
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291263A1.pdf
      • Document: 01215798941 Page: 16 17 The NAB persists that although an agency typically may promulgate de minimus exemptions to statutes it administers, see Shays v. FEC, 414 F.3d 76, 113-14 (D.C. Cir. 2005), the Commission could not view, and has not viewed, second- adjacent protections as de minimus. However, the Commission has authority under its rules, see 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, to waive requirements not mandated by statute where strict compliance would not be in the public interest, so long as it articulates identifiable standards for exercising that authority. See NetworkIP, LLC v. FCC, 548 F.3d 116, 127 (D.C. Cir. 2008); Ne. Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990); WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.3d 1153,
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291311A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291311A1.txt
      • 06/02/2009 06375.14000 33-00-32.1 N WA NE 122-02-50.1 W 0003857200 THURSTON, COUNTY OF Issaquah 06/02/2009 06335.61000 47-30-15.5 N WA NE 122-54-41.3 W 0003857201 THURSTON, COUNTY OF Olympia 06/02/2009 10995.00000 47-01-46.4 N WA NE 123-08-16.4 W 0003857203 THURSTON, COUNTY OF MC CLEARY 06/02/2009 06226.89000 46-58-23.6 N WA NE 123-08-16.4 W 0003857203 THURSTON, COUNTY OF MC CLEARY 06/02/2009 11325.00000 46-58-23.6 N CA NE 119-40-01.3 W 0003857281 Kings County Office of Education Hanford 06/02/2009 19375.00000 36-19-58.5 N CA NE 119-46-47.1 W 0003857289 Kings County Office of Education Lemoore 06/02/2009 17815.00000 36-14-39.1 N NJ NE 074-02-35.4 W 0003857486 COUNTY OF BERGEN, BERGEN COUNTHACKENSACK 06/02/2009 17750.00000 40-52-35.7 N NJ NE 074-10-56.4 W 0003857487 COUNTY OF BERGEN, BERGEN COUNTMAHWAH 06/02/2009 10965.00000 41-03-22.3 N NJ NE 074-10-56.4 W 0003857487
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291391A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291391A2.txt
      • 523,828,362 0.0 30.8 0.8 33.6 34.8 Turkey $19,337,349 0.1 25.0 4.9 16.0 53.9 $382,776 0.0 20.3 0.0 0.7 79.0 $379,346 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 200,273,502 0.1 14.8 15.0 17.4 52.8 United Kingdom $246,149,106 0.2 34.5 0.2 22.2 42.8 $26,829,095 0.0 13.3 0.0 17.5 69.2 $64,481,819 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 4,547,339,581 0.2 13.8 1.0 30.5 54.6 Western Europe $776,307,034 0.1 28.5 1.3 20.9 49.2 $81,479,312 0.0 18.1 0.0 26.3 55.6 $170,351,650 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 13,979,516,518 0.1 15.7 1.9 31.3 51.1 Algeria $8,715,356 0.0 7.0 4.3 21.5 67.3 $411,827 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $4,619 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 89,141,636 0.0 4.7 4.1 21.9 69.3 Angola $7,410,226 0.0 30.6 1.3 22.9 45.2 $48,675 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $31,630 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 39,282,697
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291567A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291567A1.txt
      • W 0003874193 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIDULUTH 06/17/2009 21875.00000 33-57-40.2 N GA NE 084-05-22.4 W 0003874193 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIDULUTH 06/17/2009 22025.00000 33-57-40.2 N WA NE 122-20-12.1 W 0003874194 SPECTRUM NETWORKS LLC SEATTLE 06/17/2009 21225.00000 47-37-04.1 N WA NE 122-20-12.1 W 0003874194 SPECTRUM NETWORKS LLC SEATTLE 06/17/2009 21325.00000 47-37-04.1 N WA NE 122-20-45.7 W 0003874195 SPECTRUM NETWORKS LLC SEATTLE 06/17/2009 17765.00000 47-37-01.3 N WA NE 122-20-45.7 W 0003874195 SPECTRUM NETWORKS LLC SEATTLE 06/17/2009 17815.00000 47-37-01.3 N WA NE 122-20-19.6 W 0003874196 SPECTRUM NETWORKS LLC SEATTLE 06/17/2009 19325.00000 47-36-51.4 N WA NE 122-20-19.6 W 0003874196 SPECTRUM NETWORKS LLC SEATTLE 06/17/2009 19375.00000 47-36-51.4 N WA NE 122-20-19.6 W 0003874196 SPECTRUM NETWORKS LLC SEATTLE 06/17/2009 22425.00000 47-36-51.4 N WA NE 122-20-19.6 W 0003874196 SPECTRUM NETWORKS
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291810A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291810A1.txt
      • 39 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City IL NE 087-53-36.0 W 0003876422 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIWaukegan 06/19/2009 19375.00000 42-21-19.0 N IL NE 087-53-36.0 W 0003876422 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIWaukegan 06/19/2009 19475.00000 42-21-19.0 N IL NE 088-08-44.4 W 0003876423 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIStreamwood 06/19/2009 10735.00000 42-02-01.3 N IL NE 088-08-44.4 W 0003876423 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIStreamwood 06/19/2009 10815.00000 42-02-01.3 N IL NE 088-08-44.4 W 0003876423 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIStreamwood 06/19/2009 21825.00000 42-02-01.3 N IL NE 088-08-44.4 W 0003876423 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIStreamwood 06/19/2009 21925.00000 42-02-01.3 N PA NE P 076-58-32.2 W 0003877476 MIDDLESEX TOWNSHIP MUNICIPAL AUWELLSVILLE 06/22/2009 00956.29375 40-02-47.4 N IN NE 087-10-06.7 W 0003877997 Hoosier
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291914A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291914A1.txt
      • La Pine 06/30/2009 06160.16000 43-39-00.7 N IA NE 092-05-35.6 W 0003888339 FARMERS CELLULAR TELEPHONE CODOUDS 06/30/2009 06585.00000 40-48-01.6 N WA NE 119-10-03.0 W 0003888782 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC KENNEWICK 07/01/2009 10637.50000 46-12-54.0 N WA NE 119-11-45.0 W 0003888800 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC KENNEWICK 07/01/2009 10572.50000 46-05-42.0 N IA NE 091-59-57.6 W 0003889188 IOWA RSA NO. 12 LIMITED PARTNERSRIDGEWAY 07/01/2009 06595.00000 43-18-01.3 N AK NE 146-32-51.1 W 0003889190 Copper Valley Telephone Cooperative, IncVALDEZ 07/01/2009 10795.00000 61-07-43.1 N Page 8 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City AK NE 146-18-23.3 W 0003889191 Copper Valley Telephone Cooperative, IncVALDEZ 07/01/2009 11285.00000 61-07-33.1 N MO NE 094-51-50.6
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291999A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291999A1.txt
      • 35-39-52.5 N TX NE 096-57-55.0 W 0003893275 FiberTower Network Services Corp. Irving 07/07/2009 11215.00000 32-53-41.0 N TX NE 096-57-55.0 W 0003893275 FiberTower Network Services Corp. Irving 07/07/2009 11485.00000 32-53-41.0 N TX NE 096-57-55.0 W 0003893275 FiberTower Network Services Corp. Irving 07/07/2009 11565.00000 32-53-41.0 N TX NE 096-57-55.0 W 0003893275 FiberTower Network Services Corp. Irving 07/07/2009 11605.00000 32-53-41.0 N CA NE 117-23-01.3 W 0003893295 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC Hesperia 07/07/2009 23035.00000 34-23-17.3 N NC NE 080-25-08.7 W 0003893348 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC Locust 07/07/2009 21885.00000 35-15-36.6 N NC NE 080-25-08.7 W 0003893348 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC Locust 07/07/2009 21935.00000 35-15-36.6 N NC NE 080-25-35.7 W 0003893420 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC Stanfield 07/07/2009 23035.00000 35-13-49.6 N Page 25 CF - Common Carrier Fixed
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292352A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292352A1.txt
      • CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA NE 118-31-57.5 W 0003905821 Royal Street BTA 262, LLC Santa Clarita Valley 07/20/2009 17890.00000 34-20-41.3 N CA NE 118-04-53.7 W 0003905825 Royal Street BTA 262, LLC Pasedena 07/20/2009 17910.00000 34-07-47.4 N CA NE 117-47-01.3 W 0003905827 Royal Street BTA 262, LLC Irvine 07/20/2009 19410.00000 33-41-27.1 N CA NE 117-45-21.3 W 0003905841 Royal Street BTA 262, LLC Irivne 07/20/2009 17850.00000 33-39-28.8 N PR NE 066-04-17.8 W 0003905864 CCPR SERVICES, INC. SAN JUAN 07/20/2009 11622.50000 18-20-45.6 N CA NE 117-21-04.9 W 0003905941 Royal Street BTA 262, LLC Victorville 07/20/2009 10573.12500 34-33-05.1 N CA NE 117-17-22.0 W
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292356A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292356A1.txt
      • MD KBF69 089-40-02.2 W 0003909316 MISSISSIPPI AUTHORITY FOR EDUCATMCADAMS 07/22/2009 06197.24000 33-02-20.4 N MS MD KBE87 089-09-00.2 W 0003909328 MISSISSIPPI AUTHORITY FOR EDUCATACKERMAN 07/22/2009 06063.80000 33-21-14.4 N MN MD WQAU442 095-51-04.5 W 0003909562 STATE OF MINNESOTA, MN/DOT RUSHMORE 07/23/2009 06197.24000 43-42-13.9 N MN MD WQAU442 095-51-04.5 W 0003909562 STATE OF MINNESOTA, MN/DOT RUSHMORE 07/23/2009 06256.54000 43-42-13.9 N MN MD WQAW725 095-44-01.3 W 0003909588 Minnesota, State of Slayton 07/23/2009 06004.50000 43-58-39.2 N MN MD WQAW725 095-44-01.3 W 0003909588 Minnesota, State of Slayton 07/23/2009 06093.45000 43-58-39.2 N Page 4 MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MS MD WQKA325 091-14-16.4 W 0003909692 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatRoxie
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292532A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292532A1.txt
      • 07/27/2009 00806.06250 18-27-45.8 N PR AM WQFZ413 066-56-24.6 W 0003834412 NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 5, INC. QUEBRADILLAS 07/27/2009 00806.06250 18-28-19.8 N AM WQHD361 A 0003834415 NEXTEL WIP LICENSE CORP. 07/27/2009 00806.00000 - 00821.00000 KY AM WQHD361 084-19-32.8 W 0003834415 NEXTEL WIP LICENSE CORP. LEXINGTON 07/27/2009 00853.63750 37-52-45.3 N KY AM WQHD361 084-34-35.8 W 0003834415 NEXTEL WIP LICENSE CORP. LEXINGTON 07/27/2009 00808.63750 38-01-01.3 N Page 24 GX - SMR, 806-821/851-866 MHz, Conventional State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City KY AM WQHD361 084-28-36.8 W 0003834415 NEXTEL WIP LICENSE CORP. LEXINGTON 07/27/2009 00808.63750 38-01-39.3 N KY AM WQHD361 084-29-44.8 W 0003834415 NEXTEL WIP LICENSE CORP. LEXINGTON 07/27/2009 00808.63750 38-02-40.3 N KY AM WQHD361 084-29-36.8
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292737A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292737A1.txt
      • W 0003921683 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIINorristown 08/04/2009 19375.00000 40-09-16.1 N PA NE 075-22-18.6 W 0003921683 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIINorristown 08/04/2009 19475.00000 40-09-16.1 N PA NE 075-22-18.6 W 0003921683 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIINorristown 08/04/2009 19525.00000 40-09-16.1 N PA NE 075-22-18.6 W 0003921683 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIINorristown 08/04/2009 19625.00000 40-09-16.1 N PA NE 075-20-17.0 W 0003921684 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIVillanova 08/04/2009 23025.00000 40-02-01.3 N PA NE 075-06-15.1 W 0003921685 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIPhiladelphia 08/04/2009 19375.00000 40-00-20.9 N PA NE 075-06-15.1 W 0003921685 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIPhiladelphia 08/04/2009 19475.00000 40-00-20.9 N PA NE 075-06-15.1 W 0003921685 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIPhiladelphia 08/04/2009 23025.00000 40-00-20.9 N PA NE 075-06-15.1 W 0003921685 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIPhiladelphia 08/04/2009 23075.00000 40-00-20.9 N Page 47 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292824A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292824A1.txt
      • PINE 08/14/2009 10631.25000 43-49-43.4 N OR MD WPON234 121-25-46.0 W 0003933006 UNITED STATES CELLULAR OPERATINLAPINE 08/14/2009 06585.00000 43-39-00.0 N OR MD WPON234 121-25-46.0 W 0003933006 UNITED STATES CELLULAR OPERATINLAPINE 08/14/2009 06815.00000 43-39-00.0 N OR MD WPON234 121-25-46.0 W 0003933006 UNITED STATES CELLULAR OPERATINLAPINE 08/14/2009 10628.75000 43-39-00.0 N PR MD WPND766 066-02-36.8 W 0003935542 CCPR Services, Inc. HATO REY 08/14/2009 11622.50000 18-25-01.3 N PR MD WPND766 066-02-36.8 W 0003935542 CCPR Services, Inc. HATO REY 08/14/2009 22825.00000 18-25-01.3 N WA NE 121-11-56.0 W 0003927566 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Lyle 08/07/2009 11405.00000 45-40-33.6 N WA NE 121-11-56.0 W 0003927566 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Lyle 08/07/2009 18080.00000 45-40-33.6 N AK NE 159-31-41.5 W 0003927589 Unicom, Inc. Shaqeluk, AK 08/07/2009 06286.19000 62-38-47.1 N AK NE 159-31-41.5
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293005A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293005A1.txt
      • WPXG300 096-57-28.0 W 0003893489 FiberTower Network Services Corp. IRVING 08/17/2009 17900.00000 32-51-43.0 N TX AM WPXG300 096-57-28.0 W 0003893489 FiberTower Network Services Corp. IRVING 08/17/2009 17980.00000 32-51-43.0 N TX AM WPXG300 096-57-28.0 W 0003893489 FiberTower Network Services Corp. IRVING 08/17/2009 18025.00000 32-51-43.0 N TX AM WPXG300 096-57-28.0 W 0003893489 FiberTower Network Services Corp. IRVING 08/17/2009 18060.00000 32-51-43.0 N CA AM 117-47-01.3 W 0003905827 Royal Street BTA 262, LLC Irvine 08/18/2009 19410.00000 33-40-27.1 N PR AM 066-04-17.8 W 0003905864 CCPR SERVICES, INC. SAN JUAN 08/18/2009 11622.50000 18-20-45.6 N NJ AM 074-10-40.5 W 0003907632 AT&T CORP. NEWARK 08/17/2009 10755.00000 40-44-04.4 N Page 3 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293258A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293258A2.txt
      • 0.8 697 3.3 215 1.0 6,511 30.6 21,266 Arkansas 5,070 35.6 461 3.2 68 0.5 274 1.9 166 1.2 8,216 57.6 14,256 California 82,565 52.8 2,368 1.5 889 0.6 4,595 2.9 2,590 1.7 63,219 40.5 156,226 Colorado 12,049 57.6 134 0.6 166 0.8 628 3.0 346 1.7 7,592 36.3 20,916 Connecticut 7,897 52.0 355 2.3 107 0.7 330 2.2 198 1.3 6,312 41.5 15,199 Delaware 2,514 54.1 13 0.3 45 1.0 143 3.1 29 0.6 1,904 41.0 4,646 District of Columbia 4,297 74.1 2 0.0 94 1.6 185 3.2 36 0.6 1,187 20.5 5,801 Florida 39,489 55.0 2,359 3.3 391 0.5 2,942 4.1 1,476 2.1 25,164 35.0 71,821 Georgia 19,642 48.4 1,778 4.4 221 0.5 1,414 3.5 695 1.7 16,806 41.4
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293261A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293261A2.txt
      • Paging, SMR 10.4 11.6 15.3 18.3 18.9 14.6 and Other Wireless Providers, Excluding LEC Affiliates Total Wireless Service Providers 3.3 5.1 6.6 9.4 12.1 17.4 25.3 28.9 30.6 36.0 40.4 41.9 43.1 Toll Service Providers Toll Affiliates of RBOCs 1.7 1.7 2.0 2.3 3.0 3.5 5.1 7.2 8.6 29.1 27.4 25.5 23.4 Toll Affiliates of Other Incumbent 0.5 0.6 1.1 1.3 1.3 1.3 LECs IXCs, Toll Resellers, Prepaid Calling 35.1 31.2 5.8 6.4 6.1 6.4 Card, Satellite Service, and Other Toll providers, Excluding LEC Affiliates Total Toll Service Providers 81.6 77.7 74.8 70.2 64.7 56.1 47.5 42.8 40.4 35.9 35.0 32.9 31.2 RBOCs and Affiliates 43.9 46.0 68.0 63.6 61.7 64.6 Other Incumbant LECs and Affiliates 6.7 6.8 5.6 5.4 5.4
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293346A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293346A1.txt
      • 10735.00000 39-41-44.4 N CO NE 105-09-55.2 W 0003953646 WEST METRO FIRE PROTECTION DISTLAKEWOOD 09/02/2009 10775.00000 39-41-44.4 N CO NE 105-09-55.2 W 0003953646 WEST METRO FIRE PROTECTION DISTLAKEWOOD 09/02/2009 10855.00000 39-41-44.4 N CO NE 105-09-55.2 W 0003953646 WEST METRO FIRE PROTECTION DISTLAKEWOOD 09/02/2009 10975.00000 39-41-44.4 N CA NE 118-59-03.1 W 0003953690 KERN, COUNTY OF BAKERSFIELD 09/02/2009 17820.00000 35-20-50.0 N NY NE 072-57-01.3 W 0003953770 Suffolk County Water Authority Yaphank, NY 09/02/2009 06585.00000 40-49-01.2 N NY NE 072-57-01.3 W 0003953770 Suffolk County Water Authority Yaphank, NY 09/02/2009 06695.00000 40-49-01.2 N IA NE 095-51-52.0 W 0003955915 Douglas County Communications DepartmCouncil Bluffs 09/03/2009 06197.24000 41-17-05.0 N IA NE 095-51-52.0 W 0003955915 Douglas County Communications DepartmCouncil Bluffs 09/03/2009 06286.19000 41-17-05.0 N IA NE 095-51-52.0 W 0003955915
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293451A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293451A1.txt
      • State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City GM NE 091-40-23.0 W 0003962319 STRATOS OFFSHORE SERVICES COMOFFSHORE 09/11/2009 06315.84000 28-14-32.0 N VA NE 078-49-28.5 W 0003962654 ALLTEL Communications of Virginia No. 1Appomattox 09/11/2009 05945.20000 37-20-28.5 N PR NE 066-28-18.8 W 0003963067 CCPR SERVICE, INC. CIALES 09/11/2009 06590.00000 18-21-19.1 N PR NE 067-09-01.3 W 0003963130 CCPR SERVICES, INC. MAYAGUEZ 09/11/2009 11137.50000 18-12-48.9 N AZ NE 113-09-45.6 W 0003963223 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Bagdad 09/11/2009 06665.00000 34-34-46.6 N PR NE 065-58-36.7 W 0003963321 CCPR SERVICES, INC. SAN LORENZO 09/11/2009 11162.50000 18-13-34.3 N CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA MD
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293511A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293511A1.txt
      • to produce constructive public policy. In addition to reform and the broadband plan, the Commission faces a number of other challenges. We are confronted with a skyrocketing Universal Service cost structure that is unsustainable. We preside over an inefficient and outdated intercarrier compensation regime. We should quickly gather more granular data to better analyze the special access market. More than 1.3 million broadcast indecency complaints, some of which are older than my children, lie ossifying in our headquarters. The Communications Act requires us to review our rules governing media ownership again next year. And during that review, as with all of our endeavors, we must be faithful to the First Amendment and defend the freedom of speech. We still have work
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293596A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293596A1.txt
      • Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City HI RM WEE508 157-49-15.3 W 0003966006 HONOLULU, CITY & COUNTY, DEPT OFHONOLULU 09/15/2009 06093.45000 21-18-54.0 N HI RM WEE508 157-49-15.3 W 0003966006 HONOLULU, CITY & COUNTY, DEPT OFHONOLULU 09/15/2009 19395.00000 21-18-54.0 N HI RM WEE513 158-11-16.1 W 0003966008 HONOLULU, CITY & COUNTY, DEPT OFWAIANAE 09/15/2009 06004.50000 21-26-34.6 N HI RM WEE514 158-00-01.3 W 0003966009 HONOLULU, CITY & COUNTY, DEPT OFKAHUKU 09/15/2009 06034.15000 21-39-52.0 N HI RM WEE514 158-00-01.3 W 0003966009 HONOLULU, CITY & COUNTY, DEPT OFKAHUKU 09/15/2009 06063.80000 21-39-52.0 N RO WNTA707 0003964304 New York, State Of, Division of State Polic 09/14/2009 RO WNEN264 0003965840 LOS ANGELES, CITY OF 09/15/2009 RO WNTW673 0003966665 HONOLULU, CITY & COUNTY, DEPT OF 09/16/2009 RO WNTW672
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293612A1.pdf
      • holding � its "own motion" to excuse procedural default � would have been erroneous, and all that would have remained would be one procedural default holding and one merits holding, with nothing connecting the two. But CompTel does not appear to argue that the FCC lacked such authority, and for good reason: the FCC had it. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (allowing the FCC to waive any regulation "for good cause shown"). 9 IV. AT&T argues that the FCC incorrectly interpreted Exemption 7(C) when it held that a corporation lacks the "personal privacy" protected by that exemption. We agree with AT&T. The FCC's interpretation of Exemption 7(C) is not entitled to deference under Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Res. Def. Council,
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293646A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293646A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293646A1.txt
      • repeatedly in recent years, and that is likely to continue. In April, the Supreme Court upheld the FCC in the Fox case, which involved ``fleeting expletives'' by celebrities at two awards shows. Although that decision addressed only procedural arguments, I am hopeful that the court has provided us enough certainty to move forward on our massive backlog of more than 1.3 million indecency complaints, many of which are older than some of my children. But the legal battle in Fox is not over yet. The April decision did not resolve the First Amendment issues, which have gone back down to the lower appellate court to consider. Observers expect the dispute to end up back in front of the Supreme Court, probably
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293751A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293751A1.txt
      • Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City WI AM WPWR549 087-35-33.0 W 0003941863 UNITED STATES CELLULAR OPERATINTWO RIVERS 09/21/2009 10627.50000 44-11-16.0 N WI AM WPWR549 087-35-33.0 W 0003941863 UNITED STATES CELLULAR OPERATINTWO RIVERS 09/21/2009 10632.50000 44-11-16.0 N PR AM 066-28-18.8 W 0003963067 CCPR SERVICES, INC. CIALES 09/21/2009 06590.00000 18-21-19.1 N PR AM 067-09-01.3 W 0003963130 CCPR SERVICES, INC. MAYAGUEZ 09/21/2009 11137.50000 18-12-48.9 N PR AM WPJC220 067-06-39.5 W 0003963163 CCPR SERVICES, INC. MAYAGUEZ 09/21/2009 06197.24000 18-11-05.2 N PR AM WPJC220 067-06-39.5 W 0003963163 CCPR SERVICES, INC. MAYAGUEZ 09/21/2009 06226.89000 18-11-05.2 N PR AM WPJC220 067-06-39.5 W 0003963163 CCPR SERVICES, INC. MAYAGUEZ 09/21/2009 06345.49000 18-11-05.2 N PR AM WPJC220 067-06-39.5 W 0003963163 CCPR SERVICES,
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293752A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293752A1.txt
      • 075-10-27.1 W 0003972506 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIUpper Dublin 09/23/2009 11505.00000 40-10-12.1 N PA MD WQKS797 075-10-27.1 W 0003972506 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIUpper Dublin 09/23/2009 11585.00000 40-10-12.1 N PA MD WQKS797 075-10-27.1 W 0003972506 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIUpper Dublin 09/23/2009 19375.00000 40-10-12.1 N PA MD WQKS797 075-10-27.1 W 0003972506 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIUpper Dublin 09/23/2009 19475.00000 40-10-12.1 N NC MD WQJE213 080-53-01.3 W 0003972587 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II CHARLOTTE 09/23/2009 11225.00000 35-16-09.7 N NC MD WQJE213 080-53-01.3 W 0003972587 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II CHARLOTTE 09/23/2009 11305.00000 35-16-09.7 N NC MD WQJE213 080-53-01.3 W 0003972587 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II CHARLOTTE 09/23/2009 19575.00000 35-16-09.7 N NC MD WQJE213 080-53-01.3 W 0003972587 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II CHARLOTTE 09/23/2009 21975.00000 35-16-09.7 N NC MD WQEY579 078-49-18.1
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293864A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293864A1.txt
      • CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHAMMOND 09/29/2009 21875.00000 41-34-20.6 N IN NE 087-30-36.0 W 0003980805 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHAMMOND 09/29/2009 22025.00000 41-34-20.6 N IL NE 087-49-26.5 W 0003980806 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIBeach Park 09/29/2009 19525.00000 42-24-42.8 N IL NE 087-49-26.5 W 0003980806 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIBeach Park 09/29/2009 19625.00000 42-24-42.8 N IL NE 088-17-09.4 W 0003980809 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIElgin 09/29/2009 18015.00000 42-02-01.3 N IL NE 088-17-09.4 W 0003980809 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIElgin 09/29/2009 18115.00000 42-02-01.3 N IL NE 088-17-09.4 W 0003980809 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIElgin 09/29/2009 23175.00000 42-02-01.3 N Page 42 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City IL NE 088-17-09.4 W 0003980809 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIElgin
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294114A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294114A1.txt
      • TN NE 086-33-29.1 W 0003995109 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC Old Hickory 10/13/2009 11485.00000 36-13-22.1 N Page 8 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TN NE 086-33-29.1 W 0003995109 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC Old Hickory 10/13/2009 11525.00000 36-13-22.1 N TN NE 086-35-01.3 W 0003995114 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC Hendersonville 10/13/2009 11405.00000 36-17-48.6 N TN NE 086-31-27.0 W 0003995118 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC MOUNT JULIET 10/13/2009 11365.00000 36-14-15.0 N TN NE 086-24-37.0 W 0003995121 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC LEBANON 10/13/2009 10875.00000 36-15-23.2 N TN NE 086-24-37.0 W 0003995121 Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC LEBANON 10/13/2009 10915.00000 36-15-23.2 N TN NE 086-24-37.0 W 0003995121 Conterra
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294115A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294115A1.txt
      • HOLDINGS IIIHarvey 10/13/2009 17915.00000 41-36-42.7 N IL MD WQKP330 087-38-14.7 W 0003996007 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHarvey 10/13/2009 21825.00000 41-36-42.7 N IL MD WQKP330 087-38-14.7 W 0003996007 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHarvey 10/13/2009 21925.00000 41-36-42.7 N IL MD WQKP330 087-38-14.7 W 0003996007 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHarvey 10/13/2009 22075.00000 41-36-42.7 N IL MD WQKN921 088-08-44.4 W 0003996008 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIStreamwood 10/13/2009 10735.00000 42-02-01.3 N IL MD WQKN921 088-08-44.4 W 0003996008 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIStreamwood 10/13/2009 10815.00000 42-02-01.3 N IL MD WQKN921 088-08-44.4 W 0003996008 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIStreamwood 10/13/2009 10975.00000 42-02-01.3 N IL MD WQKN921 088-08-44.4 W 0003996008 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIStreamwood 10/13/2009 11055.00000 42-02-01.3 N IL MD WQKN921 088-08-44.4 W 0003996008 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIStreamwood 10/13/2009 19375.00000 42-02-01.3 N IL MD WQKN921
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294279A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294279A1.txt
      • W 0004006607 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIManassas 10/23/2009 17815.00000 38-45-09.7 N VA NE 077-28-51.3 W 0004006607 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIManassas 10/23/2009 17915.00000 38-45-09.7 N VA NE 077-28-51.3 W 0004006607 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIManassas 10/23/2009 21925.00000 38-45-09.7 N VA NE 077-28-51.3 W 0004006607 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIManassas 10/23/2009 22075.00000 38-45-09.7 N VA NE 077-04-20.8 W 0004006608 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIArlington 10/23/2009 23025.00000 38-52-01.3 N Page 51 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City VA NE 077-04-20.8 W 0004006608 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIArlington 10/23/2009 23175.00000 38-52-01.3 N VA NE 077-04-20.8 W 0004006608 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIArlington 10/23/2009 23225.00000 38-52-01.3 N VA NE 077-04-20.8 W 0004006608 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIArlington
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294461A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294461A1.txt
      • HOLDINGS IIINottingham 10/29/2009 18015.00000 39-23-53.8 N MD NE 076-28-41.3 W 0004012898 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIINottingham 10/29/2009 18115.00000 39-23-53.8 N MD NE 076-28-41.3 W 0004012898 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIINottingham 10/29/2009 21875.00000 39-23-53.8 N MD NE 076-28-41.3 W 0004012898 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIINottingham 10/29/2009 21975.00000 39-23-53.8 N MD NE 076-50-48.7 W 0004012900 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIColumbia 10/29/2009 22025.00000 39-10-36.0 N MD NE 076-50-01.3 W 0004012901 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILaurel 10/29/2009 23175.00000 39-06-17.3 N MD NE 076-51-20.5 W 0004012906 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIColumbia 10/29/2009 23125.00000 39-13-24.6 N MD NE 076-51-20.5 W 0004012906 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIColumbia 10/29/2009 23175.00000 39-13-24.6 N MD NE 076-51-20.5 W 0004012906 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIColumbia 10/29/2009 23225.00000 39-13-24.6 N MD NE 076-50-06.1 W 0004012908 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILaurel 10/29/2009 22075.00000
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294681A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294681A1.txt
      • 33-30-30.0 N TX MD WPJA756 096-25-30.0 W 0004028820 AT&T Mobility Texas LLC WHITEWRIGHT 11/10/2009 06670.00000 33-30-30.0 N TX MD WPNH765 096-25-37.3 W 0004028856 AT&T Mobility Texas LLC BELLS 11/10/2009 06197.24000 33-36-22.4 N TX MD WPNH765 096-25-37.3 W 0004028856 AT&T Mobility Texas LLC BELLS 11/10/2009 06736.25000 33-36-22.4 N MD MD WQGT652 077-05-44.2 W 0004028875 airBand Communications, Inc. Bethesda, MD 11/10/2009 22670.00000 38-59-01.3 N MD MD WQGT652 077-05-44.2 W 0004028875 airBand Communications, Inc. Bethesda, MD 11/10/2009 23025.00000 38-59-01.3 N CA MD WQKA207 118-17-32.6 W 0004028960 Bel Air Internet Los Angeles 11/10/2009 17915.00000 34-03-42.3 N MN MD WPNB296 095-36-55.0 W 0004029291 RCC Minnesota, Inc. KAHKONCE 11/12/2009 06226.89000 47-20-51.0 N MN MD WPNB296 095-36-55.0 W 0004029291 RCC Minnesota, Inc. KAHKONCE 11/12/2009 06345.49000 47-20-51.0 N MN
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294833A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294833A1.txt
      • W 0004034883 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISTEELTON 11/16/2009 17765.00000 40-14-37.6 N PA NE 076-50-37.0 W 0004034883 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISTEELTON 11/16/2009 18015.00000 40-14-37.6 N PA NE 076-50-37.0 W 0004034883 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISTEELTON 11/16/2009 18115.00000 40-14-37.6 N PA NE 076-47-56.7 W 0004034884 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHighspire 11/16/2009 21875.00000 40-12-33.3 N PA NE 076-58-07.0 W 0004034885 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHampden 11/16/2009 19375.00000 40-14-01.3 N Page 27 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City PA NE 076-58-07.0 W 0004034885 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHampden 11/16/2009 19425.00000 40-14-01.3 N PA NE 076-58-07.0 W 0004034885 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHampden 11/16/2009 19475.00000 40-14-01.3 N PA NE 076-58-07.0 W 0004034885 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHampden
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294834A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294834A1.txt
      • 38-49-09.0 N MO NE 090-15-43.2 W 0004037502 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISt. Louis 11/18/2009 11265.00000 38-37-18.1 N MO NE 090-15-43.2 W 0004037502 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISt. Louis 11/18/2009 11385.00000 38-37-18.1 N MO NE 090-15-43.2 W 0004037502 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISt. Louis 11/18/2009 23125.00000 38-37-18.1 N MO NE 090-15-43.2 W 0004037502 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISt. Louis 11/18/2009 23275.00000 38-37-18.1 N MO NE 090-14-01.3 W 0004037506 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISt. Louis 11/18/2009 19575.00000 38-39-54.0 N MO NE 090-14-01.3 W 0004037506 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISt. Louis 11/18/2009 19675.00000 38-39-54.0 N MO NE 090-14-01.3 W 0004037506 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISt. Louis 11/18/2009 21825.00000 38-39-54.0 N MO NE 090-14-01.3 W 0004037506 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISt. Louis 11/18/2009 21975.00000 38-39-54.0 N MO NE 090-21-30.2 W 0004037508 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294928A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294928A1.txt
      • Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OR MD WQHP337 124-30-12.5 W 0004043674 Edge Wireless, LLC Port Orford 11/24/2009 10587.50000 42-44-40.3 N OR MD WQHP336 124-24-13.0 W 0004043688 Edge Wireless, LLC Gold Beach 11/24/2009 10622.50000 42-30-14.5 N IL MD WQJK916 090-09-54.8 W 0004043696 USCOC OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS, LLC DAHINDA 11/24/2009 10552.50000 40-58-01.3 N IL MD WQJK916 090-09-54.8 W 0004043696 USCOC OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS, LLC DAHINDA 11/24/2009 10557.50000 40-58-01.3 N IL MD WQJK916 090-09-54.8 W 0004043696 USCOC OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS, LLC DAHINDA 11/24/2009 10567.50000 40-58-01.3 N OR MD WQFU237 124-25-00.7 W 0004043860 Edge Wireless, LLC Gold Beach 11/24/2009 19375.00000 42-26-24.7 N OR MD WQFU238 124-24-47.6 W 0004043894 Edge Wireless, LLC Gold Beach 11/24/2009
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294929A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294929A1.txt
      • WWC License L.L.C. Stone Cabin 11/27/2009 33-34-12.0 N IL MD KNKN477 089-02-45.2 W 0004046917 Cellco Partnership Woodlawn 11/27/2009 38-21-39.2 N AZ MD KNKN256 114-20-59.0 W 0004046921 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Quartzsite 11/27/2009 33-34-12.0 N AZ MD KNKN256 113-32-45.9 W 0004046921 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Roll 11/27/2009 32-47-43.4 N CA MD KNKA381 121-50-02.6 W 0004046925 GTE MOBILNET OF CALIFORNIA LIMITEDixon 11/27/2009 38-28-01.3 N CA MD KNKA381 121-42-21.7 W 0004046925 GTE MOBILNET OF CALIFORNIA LIMITERIO VISTA 11/27/2009 38-09-34.6 N Page 3 Land Mobile Control Station Meeting the 6.1m Rule Box/Rectangular KMRA around a centerpoint KMRA around a site (listed on application) Area of Operation Key: Modification Amendment Purpose Key: AM MD A P X R C Countywide S Statewide N Nationwide including HI,AK,US
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295212A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295212A1.txt
      • 95.0 96.5 1.5 District of Columbia 94.7 91.3 -3.4 Florida 85.5 92.9 7.4 * Georgia 88.9 93.8 4.9 Hawaii 94.6 98.7 4.1 Idaho 89.5 96.3 6.8 * Illinois 95.0 95.9 0.9 Indiana 90.3 92.3 2.0 Iowa 95.4 98.3 2.9 Kansas 94.9 97.1 2.2 Kentucky 86.9 94.8 7.9 * Louisiana 88.9 94.9 6.0 Maine 90.7 97.1 6.3 * Maryland 96.3 95.0 -1.3 Massachusetts 94.3 98.2 3.9 Michigan 93.8 97.1 3.3 Minnesota 96.4 98.1 1.7 Mississippi 82.4 94.1 11.8 * Missouri 92.1 95.1 3.1 Montana 92.8 92.3 -0.5 Nebraska 94.0 95.9 1.9 Nevada 89.4 94.4 5.0 * New Hampshire 95.0 98.0 3.1 New Jersey 94.1 95.1 0.9 New Mexico 85.3 95.3 9.9 * New York 90.8 95.4 4.5 * North Carolina 89.3 95.5
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295377A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295377A1.txt
      • Large Price-Cap Carriers 97.0 97.5 98.0 98.5 99.0 99.5 100.0 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Years Percent o f Co mmitments M et Weighted BOC/Embarq Composite* Weighted Verizon Avg AT&T BellSouth Weighted AT&T Avg. (excluding BellSouth) Qwest 19 ARMIS 43-05 Report 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 AT&T Ameritech 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.7 1.7 AT&T BellSouth 1.1 1.1 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.2 AT&T Pacific 1.5 1.6 1.5 1.6 1.3 1.1 AT&T Southwestern 1.9 2.0 2.1 1.1 1.0 0.9 AT&T SNET 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 0.8 0.7 Qwest 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 ** Verizon GTE 0.6 0.6 0.9 0.8 0.8 1.0 Verizon North (Combined with Verizon South) Verizon South 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.4 1.9 Embarq (formerly Sprint) 1.4
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
      • Libraries Disbursements per Student .......................................... Table 4.7 State Code Reference ............................................................................................... Table 8.4 Subscribership - Household - United States ........................................................... Table 6.1 Switch Downtime and Trunk Blocking ................................................................... Table 9.2 Switch Downtime Causes ....................................................................................... Table 9.3 Telecommunications Industry Revenues by Service ............................................. Table 1.2 Telecommunications Industry Revenues - Total ................................................... Table 1.1 Telecommunications Revenues by Type of Carrier .............................................. Table 1.3 Telecommunications Revenues - Interstate ........................................................ Table 1.16 Telecommunications Revenues - Intrastate ........................................................ Table 1.15 Telecommunications Revenues - Total - by State ................................................. Table 1.13 Telecommunications Revenues - 2007................................... ................... Table 1.14 Universal Service Program Requirements and Contribution Factors ..................... Table 1.10 5 Index of Tables and Charts Universal Service Support - Distribution of Universal Service Payments ............ Chart 1.1 Universal
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A11.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A11.txt
      • 11.8 Average Repair Interval (hours) 6.0 3.5 5.8 5.0 4.1 3.7 4.0 3.7 3.8 LOCAL SERVICES PROVIDED TO RESIDENTIAL AND BUSINESS CUSTOMERS Percent Installation Commitments Met 98.4 97.3 99.5 99.1 99.7 99.7 99.0 98.3 98.0 Residence 98.5 98.5 99.6 99.0 99.7 99.8 99.1 98.4 98.2 Business 98.3 89.5 99.3 99.0 99.5 99.1 98.2 97.4 95.8 Average Installation Interval (days) 1.8 1.3 1.2 1.0 1.3 0.1 2.5 1.8 1.1 Residence 1.8 1.2 1.1 0.9 0.7 0.0 2.6 1.7 1.0 Business 1.7 1.3 1.8 1.5 3.4 0.4 1.6 2.1 2.0 Average Out of Service Repair Interval (hours) 25.5 23.6 31.7 29.5 33.9 17.5 27.3 46.2 29.0 Residence 26.4 25.7 32.9 31.0 34.9 18.2 29.4 52.2 31.5 Business 21.3 14.5 24.8 23.8 28.3 14.8
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A2.txt
      • Libraries Disbursements per Student .......................................... Table 4.7 State Code Reference ............................................................................................... Table 8.4 Subscribership - Household - United States ........................................................... Table 6.1 Switch Downtime and Trunk Blocking ................................................................... Table 9.2 Switch Downtime Causes ....................................................................................... Table 9.3 Telecommunications Industry Revenues by Service ............................................. Table 1.2 Telecommunications Industry Revenues - Total ................................................... Table 1.1 Telecommunications Revenues by Type of Carrier .............................................. Table 1.3 Telecommunications Revenues - Interstate ........................................................ Table 1.16 Telecommunications Revenues - Intrastate ........................................................ Table 1.15 Telecommunications Revenues - Total - by State ................................................. Table 1.13 Telecommunications Revenues - 2007................................... ................... Table 1.14 Universal Service Program Requirements and Contribution Factors ..................... Table 1.10 5 Index of Tables and Charts Universal Service Support - Distribution of Universal Service Payments ............ Chart 1.1 Universal
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.txt
      • corrections have been made based on supplemental filer information or as a result of audits. Nonetheless, disaggregated data are likely to be less accurate than industry totals. Table 1.1 shows the major components of telecommunications revenues for 1998 through 2008. This table was created by simply aggregating the revenues in the major classifications designated on Form 499-A. Tables 1.2 and 1.3 provide a look at annual industry revenues over time. Generally, Form 499-A revenue data can be tabulated in two distinct ways: by type of service provided and by type of business. Table 1.2 categorizes revenues by type of service and shows, for example, that carriers reported $121.2 billion in wireless service revenues for 2007. This total includes wireless service revenues
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.txt
      • 0 50 100 150 200 250 1956 1960 1964 1968 1972 1976 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 2008 CPI All Items CPI Telephone Services 7 - 5 1980 9.7 12.5 4.6 1981 8.3 8.9 11.7 1982 5.2 3.8 7.2 1983 3.4 3.8 3.6 1984 3.6 3.9 9.2 1985 2.8 3.8 4.7 1986 2.3 1.1 2.7 1987 2.9 4.4 -1.3 1988 3.7 4.4 1.3 1989 3.5 4.6 -0.3 1990 4.1 6.1 -0.4 1991 3.1 3.1 3.5 1992 2.1 2.9 -0.3 1993 2.3 2.7 1.8 1994 2.2 2.7 0.7 1995 2.0 2.5 1.2 1996 1.9 3.3 2.1 1997 1.5 1.7 0.2 1998 1.1 1.6 0.3* 1999 1.5 2.7 0.4 2000 2.3 3.4 -2.3 2001 2.5 1.6 1.3 2002 1.7 2.4 0.2
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295495A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295495A1.txt
      • 12St., S.W. Below is a listing of applications, subject to the pre-grant notice and petition procedure of Section 309 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, that were accepted for filing. CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City VT NE 072-56-01.3 W 0004080174 T-Mobile License LLC Underhill 12/31/2009 19627.50000 44-30-29.1 N VT NE 072-48-52.1 W 0004080186 T-Mobile License LLC Stowe 12/31/2009 18067.50000 44-31-32.1 N CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City AZ MD KNKN251 109-22-51.0 W 0004080229 Alltel Communications, LLC Douglas 12/31/2009 31-33-06.7 N AZ MD KNKN251 109-18-49.3
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295512A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295512A1.txt
      • ID: 8008B 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 36M0F8W Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) E900051 SES-RWL-20091231-01641 E Date Effective: 01/05/2010 Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Grant of Authority 02/02/2010 - 02/02/2025 Renewal Minnesota Public Radio Nature of Service: Domestic Fixed Satellite Service Page 16 of 18 47 � 58 ' 38.00 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 APPROX. 1.3 MILES ENE OF EUCLID, POLK, EUCLID, MN 96 � 36 ' 32.00 " W LONG. LOCATION: COMTECH 1 5 meters ANTENNA ID: 843864-5M-PF-FG 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 180KF3E 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 30K0F1D Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) E000166 SES-STA-20091118-01474 E Date Effective: 01/05/2010 Class of Station: Grant of Authority Special Temporary Authority HNS License Sub, LLC
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295623A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295623A1.txt
      • WA NE 119-18-48.9 W 0004084227 Benton County Public Utility District KENNEWICK 01/06/2010 17965.00000 46-12-03.6 N WA NE 119-16-47.6 W 0004084228 Benton County Public Utility District KENNEWICK 01/06/2010 19525.00000 46-10-04.7 N MS NE 089-22-54.8 W 0004084643 MISSISSIPPI AUTHORITY FOR EDUCATFrench Camp 01/06/2010 05945.20000 33-15-09.3 N MS NE 089-22-54.8 W 0004084643 MISSISSIPPI AUTHORITY FOR EDUCATFrench Camp 01/06/2010 06315.84000 33-15-09.3 N OR NE 123-03-01.3 W 0004085170 YAMHILL, COUNTY OF NEWBERG 01/07/2010 06770.00000 45-23-21.4 N MO NE 091-13-26.7 W 0004085472 WARREN, COUNTY OF (EMERGENCY SWarrenton 01/07/2010 06765.00000 38-55-24.6 N MO NE 091-13-26.7 W 0004085472 WARREN, COUNTY OF (EMERGENCY SWarrenton 01/07/2010 06785.00000 38-55-24.6 N MO NE 091-01-56.0 W 0004085474 WARREN, COUNTY OF (EMERGENCY SWRIGHT CITY 01/07/2010 06745.00000 38-47-34.0 N MO NE 091-01-56.0 W 0004085474 WARREN, COUNTY
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295777A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295777A1.txt
      • 18115.00000 37-25-21.4 N CA MD WQKU515 122-05-08.0 W 0004087224 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIMountain View 01/11/2010 23025.00000 37-25-21.4 N CA MD WQKU515 122-05-08.0 W 0004087224 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIMountain View 01/11/2010 23075.00000 37-25-21.4 N CA MD WQKU515 122-05-08.0 W 0004087224 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIMountain View 01/11/2010 23125.00000 37-25-21.4 N NJ MD WIA276 074-54-37.5 W 0004087971 TEXAS EASTERN COMMUNICATIONS ILAMBERTVILLE 01/11/2010 06226.89000 40-24-01.3 N Page 8 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NJ MD WIA276 074-54-37.5 W 0004087971 TEXAS EASTERN COMMUNICATIONS ILAMBERTVILLE 01/11/2010 06256.54000 40-24-01.3 N PA MD WIA275 075-10-24.6 W 0004087984 TEXAS EASTERN COMMUNICATIONS IDOYLESTOWN 01/11/2010 05974.85000 40-19-35.3 N PA MD WIA275 075-10-24.6 W 0004087984 TEXAS
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295778A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295778A1.txt
      • HOLDINGS IIIFullerton 01/11/2010 18065.00000 33-53-15.1 N CA NE 117-53-08.9 W 0004088717 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIFullerton 01/11/2010 21825.00000 33-53-15.1 N CA NE 117-53-08.9 W 0004088717 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIFullerton 01/11/2010 21975.00000 33-53-15.1 N CA NE 117-40-27.8 W 0004088718 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIOntario 01/11/2010 21875.00000 34-03-41.4 N CA NE 117-40-27.8 W 0004088718 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIOntario 01/11/2010 22025.00000 34-03-41.4 N CA NE 117-52-01.3 W 0004088719 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIOrange 01/11/2010 19575.00000 33-49-16.5 N CA NE 117-52-01.3 W 0004088719 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIOrange 01/11/2010 19675.00000 33-49-16.5 N CA NE 117-52-01.3 W 0004088719 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIOrange 01/11/2010 23125.00000 33-49-16.5 N CA NE 117-52-01.3 W 0004088719 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIOrange 01/11/2010 23275.00000 33-49-16.5 N CA NE 117-52-26.1 W 0004088720 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIAnaheim 01/11/2010 21875.00000
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295962A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295962A1.txt
      • HOLDINGS IIIAlexandria 01/21/2010 21975.00000 38-48-25.9 N VA MD WQLG407 077-04-40.1 W 0004097959 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIAlexandria 01/21/2010 22025.00000 38-48-25.9 N VA MD WQLG407 077-04-40.1 W 0004097959 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIAlexandria 01/21/2010 22075.00000 38-48-25.9 N VA MD WQLG407 077-04-40.1 W 0004097959 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIAlexandria 01/21/2010 22175.00000 38-48-25.9 N VA MD WQLG584 077-04-20.8 W 0004097960 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIArlington 01/21/2010 23025.00000 38-52-01.3 N Page 13 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City VA MD WQLG584 077-04-20.8 W 0004097960 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIArlington 01/21/2010 23125.00000 38-52-01.3 N VA MD WQLG584 077-04-20.8 W 0004097960 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIArlington 01/21/2010 23175.00000 38-52-01.3 N VA MD WQLG584 077-04-20.8 W 0004097960 CLEARWIRE
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296121A1.pdf
      • -0.3 Indiana 90.3 93.7 3.4 Iowa 95.4 97.7 2.3 Kansas 94.9 96.9 2.0 Kentucky 86.9 92.8 5.9 * Louisiana 88.9 97.2 8.3 Maine 90.7 97.9 7.1 * Maryland 96.3 95.6 -0.6 Massachusetts 94.3 98.4 4.0 Michigan 93.8 95.8 2.0 Minnesota 96.4 97.0 0.6 Mississippi 82.4 94.3 11.9 * Missouri 92.1 96.7 4.6 * Montana 92.8 92.0 -0.8 Nebraska 94.0 95.3 1.3 Nevada 89.4 94.3 4.9 * New Hampshire 95.0 98.4 3.4 New Jersey 94.1 97.0 2.9 New Mexico 85.3 90.9 5.6 New York 90.8 95.0 4.1 * North Carolina 89.3 93.9 4.6 North Dakota 95.1 97.6 2.5 Ohio 92.2 97.1 4.9 * Oklahoma 91.5 96.5 5.0 Oregon 91.2 99.0 7.8 * Pennsylvania 95.1 98.6 3.5 * Rhode Island 93.3 96.3 2.9
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296129A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296129A1.txt
      • TX AM KNKN334 102-56-41.8 W 0003657394 WWC Texas RSA Limited Partnership MIDDLE WATER 01/25/2010 35-48-56.1 N TX AM KNKN334 102-47-19.9 W 0003657394 WWC Texas RSA Limited Partnership Mustang Lake 01/25/2010 34-56-45.7 N TX AM KNKN334 102-57-52.8 W 0003657394 WWC Texas RSA Limited Partnership Romero 01/25/2010 35-49-20.1 N TX AM KNKN334 101-43-39.9 W 0003657394 WWC Texas RSA Limited Partnership Stinnett 01/25/2010 35-51-01.3 N TX AM KNKN334 102-04-52.6 W 0003657394 WWC Texas RSA Limited Partnership Stratford 01/25/2010 36-19-53.1 N Page 28 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TX AM KNKN334 101-48-34.0 W 0003657394 WWC Texas RSA Limited Partnership Sunray 01/25/2010 36-01-22.0 N TX AM KNKN334 102-14-19.5 W 0003657394 WWC
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296239A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296239A1.txt
      • 8.1 12.0 6.9 19.8 30.6 27.7 2.5 0.4 0.0 88.0 100.0 sDSL 0.0 0.0 0.0 44.9 32.5 * 1.6 0.0 * 0.0 100.0 100.0 Other Wireline 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.5 12.3 55.1 8.7 3.1 2.2 3.1 100.0 100.0 Cable Modem 1.1 1.5 2.5 0.8 2.8 4.1 13.9 53.0 22.6 0.3 97.5 100.0 FTTP 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.7 1.4 2.7 24.2 1.3 68.4 1.2 99.8 100.0 Satellite 53.2 35.0 88.3 * * * * 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.7 100.0 Fixed Wireless 14.2 4.5 18.7 20.8 22.3 25.2 9.2 1.9 1.8 0.2 81.3 100.0 Mobile Wireless 30.2 11.9 42.1 17.1 33.3 7.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 57.9 100.0 Power Line and Other 0.0 0.0 0.0 * * * * 0.0 * 0.0 100.0
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296264A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296264A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296264A1.txt
      • Communications Commission closed early on Friday, February 5, and closed for business Monday, February 8 through Thursday, February 11, 2010. In recognition of the numerous closings and disruptions caused by the weather in the Washington, DC area, all paper and electronic filings that were due on February 5 through February 12 are now due on February 16, 2010. 47 C.F.R. �1.3. Please direct all questions and comments regarding this public notice to the Office of the Secretary at (202)418-0300. -FCC- PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 ��PNG r v ��"r�9 I'6� �d�Y�͆aX ���; Wh� �X,�aX���y�]\\.W`h���va6l! �v"]�V�at�������-``````�"m(c)x<��G�<���={-N��J%t�<== �"""x ҍ� � ��(c)���!��'' �R)&� �A�� "���\��v`` � 6�
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296275A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296275A1.txt
      • Texas RSA Limited Partnership ODESSA 02/02/2010 06226.89000 31-47-06.5 N TX MD WMS832 102-28-18.5 W 0004113875 WWC Texas RSA Limited Partnership ODESSA 02/02/2010 06286.19000 31-47-06.5 N TX MD WMS832 102-28-18.5 W 0004113875 WWC Texas RSA Limited Partnership ODESSA 02/02/2010 06345.49000 31-47-06.5 N TX MD WMS832 102-28-18.5 W 0004113875 WWC Texas RSA Limited Partnership ODESSA 02/02/2010 06404.79000 31-47-06.5 N NV MD WPJD342 115-51-01.3 W 0004114280 WWC License L.L.C. Elko 02/02/2010 06152.75000 40-55-18.7 N NV MD WPJD342 115-51-01.3 W 0004114280 WWC License L.L.C. Elko 02/02/2010 06197.24000 40-55-18.7 N NV MD WPJD342 115-51-01.3 W 0004114280 WWC License L.L.C. Elko 02/02/2010 06226.89000 40-55-18.7 N NV MD WPJD342 115-51-01.3 W 0004114280 WWC License L.L.C. Elko 02/02/2010 06256.54000 40-55-18.7 N NV MD WPJD342 115-51-01.3 W 0004114280 WWC License
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296480A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296480A1.txt
      • 0.8 743 3.5 238 1.1 6,650 31.2 21,303 Arkansas 5,118 35.4 421 2.9 50 0.3 285 2.0 166 1.1 8,412 58.2 14,453 California 82,747 53.1 1,794 1.2 723 0.5 4,463 2.9 3,071 2.0 63,042 40.5 155,841 Colorado 12,325 58.5 56 0.3 124 0.6 611 2.9 372 1.8 7,581 36.0 21,069 Connecticut 7,926 52.5 284 1.9 91 0.6 352 2.3 200 1.3 6,251 41.4 15,104 Delaware 2,670 56.8 13 0.3 42 0.9 147 3.1 29 0.6 1,799 38.3 4,700 District of Columbia 4,341 73.3 2 0.0 73 1.2 220 3.7 39 0.7 1,245 21.0 5,919 Florida 39,672 54.9 2,305 3.2 521 0.7 3,159 4.4 1,330 1.8 25,220 34.9 72,206 Georgia 19,513 48.6 1,840 4.6 279 0.7 1,489 3.7 729 1.8 16,279 40.6
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296634A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296634A1.txt
      • W 0004138745 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC MANCHESTER 02/26/2010 06545.62500 42-57-49.7 N NY MD WLM414 077-13-12.1 W 0004138745 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC MANCHESTER 02/26/2010 06600.00000 42-57-49.7 N NY MD WLM414 077-13-12.1 W 0004138745 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC MANCHESTER 02/26/2010 11585.00000 42-57-49.7 N TX NE 094-10-21.4 W 0004133126 ALLTEL Communications of Southwest ArAtlanta 02/23/2010 06315.84000 33-07-57.2 N PR NE 065-59-01.3 W 0004133127 AT&T Mobility Puerto Rico Inc. Carolina 02/22/2010 11187.50000 18-24-14.9 N TX NE 096-15-00.6 W 0004133760 San Antonio MTA, L.P. Chappell Hill 02/23/2010 06286.19000 30-08-03.2 N TX NE 094-44-08.4 W 0004133917 Verizon Wireless Texas LLC Lufkin 02/23/2010 06286.19000 31-18-38.3 N WY NE 105-29-46.2 W 0004135056 Cellular, Inc. Financial Corporation GILLETTE 02/24/2010 10795.00000 44-16-06.2 N PR NE 065-37-49.9 W 0004135068
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296635A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296635A1.txt
      • HOLDINGS IIIHouston 02/24/2010 19525.00000 29-42-54.8 N TX NE 095-23-55.6 W 0004134638 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHouston 02/24/2010 19625.00000 29-42-54.8 N TX NE 095-23-55.6 W 0004134638 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHouston 02/24/2010 21825.00000 29-42-54.8 N TX NE 095-23-55.6 W 0004134638 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHouston 02/24/2010 21925.00000 29-42-54.8 N TX NE 095-23-55.6 W 0004134638 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHouston 02/24/2010 23225.00000 29-42-54.8 N TX NE 095-18-01.3 W 0004134639 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHouston 02/24/2010 11305.00000 29-47-47.6 N TX NE 095-18-01.3 W 0004134639 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHouston 02/24/2010 11345.00000 29-47-47.6 N TX NE 095-18-01.3 W 0004134639 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHouston 02/24/2010 11385.00000 29-47-47.6 N TX NE 095-18-01.3 W 0004134639 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHouston 02/24/2010 11425.00000 29-47-47.6 N TX NE 095-18-01.3 W 0004134639 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHouston 02/24/2010 11505.00000
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296748A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296748A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296748A1.txt
      • of our communities is a core challenge for our still-young 21st century. There is good news. Already we see a blossoming participatory and experimental culture on the Internet. We see evolving new platforms that astound us, from smart phones to tablets to the advent of at-home 3-D viewing. We have the world at our finger-tips. Yet even as Americans consumed 1.3 trillion hours of media in 2008, the production and distribution of essential news and information content has never been more in doubt. It will come as no surprise to many of you in this room that I have deep and abiding concerns about the state of our current media and our journalistic institutions. The same hyper-speculation and consolidation that infected
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296749A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296749A1.txt
      • - 00608.00000 31-48-55.0 N CA NE P 121-53-22.8 W 0004149028 KTVU PARTNERSHIP San Jose 03/05/2010 00174.00000 - 00216.00000 37-23-38.8 N CA NE P 121-53-22.8 W 0004149028 KTVU PARTNERSHIP San Jose 03/05/2010 00494.00000 - 00608.00000 37-23-38.8 N MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City WV AM 080-52-01.3 W 0004046263 Columbia Gas Transmission Company Frametown 03/01/2010 06835.00000 38-40-05.3 N WV AM 080-52-01.3 W 0004046263 Columbia Gas Transmission Company Frametown 03/01/2010 06845.00000 38-40-05.3 N TX MD WQLK825 095-31-32.0 W 0004139060 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHouston 03/01/2010 23025.00000 29-48-06.5 N TX MD WQLK825 095-31-32.0 W 0004139060 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHouston 03/01/2010 23075.00000 29-48-06.5 N TX MD WQLK825 095-31-32.0 W 0004139060 CLEARWIRE
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296751A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296751A1.txt
      • N WV MD WPNG841 081-58-53.8 W 0004144400 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC BUFFALO 03/03/2010 06004.50000 38-35-17.3 N WV MD WPNG841 081-58-53.8 W 0004144400 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC BUFFALO 03/03/2010 06063.80000 38-35-17.3 N WV MD WPNG841 081-58-53.8 W 0004144400 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC BUFFALO 03/03/2010 10557.50000 38-35-17.3 N CA MD WHQ547 122-45-03.2 W 0004149337 AT&T CALIFORNIA REDDING 03/05/2010 06093.45000 40-41-01.3 N PR NE 065-37-43.0 W 0004142186 PR Wireless, Inc. Fajardo 03/02/2010 19355.00000 18-21-58.3 N PR NE 067-02-31.2 W 0004142796 PR Wireless, Inc. San German 03/02/2010 19305.00000 18-05-59.7 N VA NE 077-20-03.8 W 0004149034 AT&T CORP. BOWLING GREEN 03/05/2010 19325.00000 38-08-01.7 N VA NE 077-20-03.8 W 0004149034 AT&T CORP. BOWLING GREEN 03/05/2010 19425.00000 38-08-01.7 N VA NE 077-20-03.8 W 0004149034 AT&T
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296753A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296753A1.txt
      • Spectrum Holdings II, LLC Lithonia 03/04/2010 17815.00000 33-42-13.7 N GA MD WQIR309 084-08-43.4 W 0004144953 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II, LLC Lithonia 03/04/2010 17915.00000 33-42-13.7 N GA MD WQIR309 084-08-43.4 W 0004144953 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II, LLC Lithonia 03/04/2010 21825.00000 33-42-13.7 N GA MD WQIR309 084-08-43.4 W 0004144953 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II, LLC Lithonia 03/04/2010 21925.00000 33-42-13.7 N GA MD WQIQ777 084-12-01.3 W 0004144954 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II, LLC Decatur 03/04/2010 17815.00000 33-41-14.1 N GA MD WQIQ777 084-12-01.3 W 0004144954 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II, LLC Decatur 03/04/2010 17915.00000 33-41-14.1 N GA MD WQIQ777 084-12-01.3 W 0004144954 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II, LLC Decatur 03/04/2010 21875.00000 33-41-14.1 N GA MD WQIQ777 084-12-01.3 W 0004144954 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II, LLC Decatur 03/04/2010 21975.00000 33-41-14.1 N
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296889A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296889A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296889A1.txt
      • from smart phones to tablets to the advent of at-home 3-D viewing and we can communicate with someone on the other side of the world as easily as with our next-door neighbor. But an increase of technology does not by itself guarantee a more informed citizenry. A 2009 study indicates that, as a country, we now consume in excess of 1.3 trillion hours of media per year. Yet the production and distribution of essential news and information content has never been more in doubt. The same hyper-speculation and consolidation that wreaked such havoc on so much of our economy began early with media, and the destruction was compounded by the almost complete dismantlement of public interest oversight of our broadcast stations,
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296903A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296903A1.txt
      • SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II LLC 19360.00000000 Charlotte 35-18-57.2 N NC 80-55-52.1 W 1 1 02/06/2010 WQJD991 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II LLC 19440.00000000 Charlotte 35-18-57.2 N NC 80-55-52.1 W 1 1 02/06/2010 WQJD992 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II LLC 17880.00000000 PINESVILLE 35-5-35.1 N NC 80-52-0.3 W 1 1 02/06/2010 WQJE213 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II LLC 19575.00000000 CHARLOTTE 35-16-9.7 N NC 80-53-1.3 W 1 1 02/06/2010 WQJE214 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II LLC 21970.00000000 CHARLOTTE 35-13-7.9 N NC 80-51-19.8 W 1 1 02/06/2010 WQJE215 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II LLC 11425.00000000 CHARLOTTE 35-8-54.7 N NC 80-50-13.1 W 1 1 02/06/2010 WQJE215 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II LLC 11305.00000000 CHARLOTTE 35-8-54.7 N NC 80-50-13.1 W 2 1 02/06/2010 WQJE215 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296906A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296906A1.txt
      • CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIMahwah 03/08/2010 23075.00000 41-01-20.5 N Page 40 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NJ NE 074-09-16.7 W 0004150973 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHawthorne 03/08/2010 23075.00000 40-57-12.2 N NJ NE 074-09-16.7 W 0004150973 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHawthorne 03/08/2010 23225.00000 40-57-12.2 N NY NE 073-55-01.3 W 0004150974 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIINew York City 03/08/2010 23175.00000 40-52-08.4 N NY NE 073-55-01.3 W 0004150974 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIINew York City 03/08/2010 23275.00000 40-52-08.4 N NY NE 073-55-01.3 W 0004150974 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIINew York City 03/08/2010 23325.00000 40-52-08.4 N NY NE 073-55-01.3 W 0004150974 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIINew York City 03/08/2010 23425.00000 40-52-08.4 N NY NE 073-55-01.3
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296908A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296908A1.txt
      • SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIKing of Prussia 03/12/2010 17815.00000 40-05-18.9 N PA MD WQKS772 075-24-25.2 W 0004159993 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIKing of Prussia 03/12/2010 17915.00000 40-05-18.9 N PA MD WQKS772 075-24-25.2 W 0004159993 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIKing of Prussia 03/12/2010 17965.00000 40-05-18.9 N PA MD WQKS772 075-24-25.2 W 0004159993 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIKing of Prussia 03/12/2010 18065.00000 40-05-18.9 N PA MD WQLJ294 076-51-01.3 W 0004159996 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHarrisburg 03/12/2010 17765.00000 40-16-17.8 N PA MD WQLJ294 076-51-01.3 W 0004159996 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHarrisburg 03/12/2010 19525.00000 40-16-17.8 N PA MD WQLI871 076-48-22.2 W 0004159997 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISwatara 03/12/2010 17765.00000 40-14-59.5 N Page 11 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297036A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297036A1.txt
      • N MO NE 090-13-41.2 W 0004169350 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISt. Louis 03/15/2010 23075.00000 38-47-52.4 N MO NE 090-13-41.2 W 0004169350 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISt. Louis 03/15/2010 23125.00000 38-47-52.4 N MO NE 090-13-41.2 W 0004169350 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISt. Louis 03/15/2010 23225.00000 38-47-52.4 N MO NE 090-13-41.2 W 0004169350 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISt. Louis 03/15/2010 23275.00000 38-47-52.4 N OH RM WQU54 081-03-01.3 W 0004167634 EAST OHIO GAS COMPANY THOMPSON 03/15/2010 06595.00000 41-41-48.1 N Page 51 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OH RM WQU54 081-03-01.3 W 0004167634 EAST OHIO GAS COMPANY THOMPSON 03/15/2010 06695.00000 41-41-48.1 N RO WNTY201 0004166760 CenterPoint Energy 03/15/2010 RO WNTY202 0004166761 CenterPoint
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297038A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297038A1.txt
      • HOLDINGS IIIHomewood 03/17/2010 22075.00000 41-33-48.6 N IL MD WQLK949 087-37-47.6 W 0004175543 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHomewood 03/17/2010 22225.00000 41-33-48.6 N IL MD WQLK542 088-07-59.2 W 0004175544 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIJOLIET 03/17/2010 22075.00000 41-30-41.6 N IL MD WQLK542 088-07-59.2 W 0004175544 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIJOLIET 03/17/2010 23075.00000 41-30-41.6 N IL MD WQKN921 088-08-44.4 W 0004175545 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIStreamwood 03/17/2010 10735.00000 42-02-01.3 N IL MD WQKN921 088-08-44.4 W 0004175545 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIStreamwood 03/17/2010 10815.00000 42-02-01.3 N IL MD WQKN921 088-08-44.4 W 0004175545 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIStreamwood 03/17/2010 10935.00000 42-02-01.3 N Page 32 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City IL MD WQKN921 088-08-44.4 W 0004175545 CLEARWIRE
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297118A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297118A1.txt
      • us, from smart phones to tablets to the advent of at-home 3-D viewing and we can communicate with someone on the other side of the world as easily as with our next-door neighbor. An increase of technology does not by itself guarantee a more informed citizenry. A 2009 study indicates that, as a country, we now consume in excess of 1.3 trillion hours of media 4 per year. Yet the production and distribution of essential news and information content has never been more in doubt. The same hyper-speculation and consolidation that wreaked havoc on so much of our economy began even earlier with the media sector. That, coupled with the dismantlement of public interest oversight of our broadcast stations, has decimated
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297269A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297269A2.txt
      • U.S.-billed traffic. Table A1 shows that carriers reported 75 billion minutes of U.S.-billed traffic in 2008, for which they billed $6.5 billion. Table A25 shows that 64.3 billion of these minutes and $5.5 billion of this revenue were for calls that originated in the United States or terminated collect or caller toll-free in the United States. Table A26 shows that 1.3 billion of these minutes and $0.2 billion of this revenue was for country-direct and country-beyond type services. Table A27 shows that 9.3 billion of these minutes and $0.8 billion of this revenue was for reorigination services billed to foreign carriers. Foreign-billed traffic is all traffic billed by a foreign or correspondent carrier and includes most calls that originate at foreign
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297358A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297358A1.txt
      • 123-07-24.3 W 0004197158 PacifiCorp SALEM 04/01/2010 00932.66250 44-51-13.4 N OR MD WNTA356 123-07-24.3 W 0004197158 PacifiCorp SALEM 04/01/2010 05974.85000 44-51-13.4 N OR MD WNTA356 123-07-24.3 W 0004197158 PacifiCorp SALEM 04/01/2010 06152.75000 44-51-13.4 N OR MD WNTA356 123-07-24.3 W 0004197158 PacifiCorp SALEM 04/01/2010 06555.00000 44-51-13.4 N OR MD WNTA356 123-07-24.3 W 0004197158 PacifiCorp SALEM 04/01/2010 06615.00000 44-51-13.4 N OR MD WNTA355 123-06-01.3 W 0004197163 PacifiCorp ALBANY 04/01/2010 00941.51250 44-37-42.4 N OR MD WNTA355 123-06-01.3 W 0004197163 PacifiCorp ALBANY 04/01/2010 00941.61250 44-37-42.4 N OR MD WNTA355 123-06-01.3 W 0004197163 PacifiCorp ALBANY 04/01/2010 06286.19000 44-37-42.4 N OR MD WNTA355 123-06-01.3 W 0004197163 PacifiCorp ALBANY 04/01/2010 06404.79000 44-37-42.4 N OR MD WNTA355 123-06-01.3 W 0004197163 PacifiCorp ALBANY 04/01/2010 06775.00000 44-37-42.4 N OR MD WNTA355 123-06-01.3
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297470A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297470A1.txt
      • 123-05-46.0 W 0004203256 MENDOCINO, COUNTY OF POTTER VALLEY 04/08/2010 02141.20000 39-30-56.6 N CA MD WNTB667 123-05-46.0 W 0004203256 MENDOCINO, COUNTY OF POTTER VALLEY 04/08/2010 06063.80000 39-30-56.6 N CA MD WNTB667 123-05-46.0 W 0004203256 MENDOCINO, COUNTY OF POTTER VALLEY 04/08/2010 06123.10000 39-30-56.6 N CA MD WNTB667 123-05-46.0 W 0004203256 MENDOCINO, COUNTY OF POTTER VALLEY 04/08/2010 06795.00000 39-30-56.6 N ND MD WQGY520 096-47-01.3 W 0004203856 CASS, COUNTY OF FARGO 04/08/2010 10553.75000 46-52-22.5 N ND MD WQGY520 096-47-01.3 W 0004203856 CASS, COUNTY OF FARGO 04/08/2010 10563.75000 46-52-22.5 N ND MD WQGY520 096-47-01.3 W 0004203856 CASS, COUNTY OF FARGO 04/08/2010 10573.75000 46-52-22.5 N ND MD WQGY520 096-47-01.3 W 0004203856 CASS, COUNTY OF FARGO 04/08/2010 10581.25000 46-52-22.5 N UT MD WPOT580 112-18-31.8 W 0004203864 TOOELE, COUNTY
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297471A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297471A1.txt
      • FL MD KNKN602 083-26-40.3 W 0004200438 Alltel Communications, LLC PERRY 04/06/2010 30-06-09.8 N KS MD KNKN493 100-43-11.5 W 0004200587 Alltel Communications, LLC Selden 04/06/2010 39-28-50.3 N Page 15 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City AZ MD KNKA286 110-45-43.0 W 0004200602 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Tucson 04/06/2010 32-17-01.3 N AZ MD KNKA286 110-47-16.3 W 0004200602 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Tucson 04/06/2010 32-26-26.2 N AK MD WQKY736 155-35-32.6 W 0004201295 GCI Communication Corp. McGrath 04/06/2010 62-56-56.9 N GM - 800 MHz Conventional SMR (SMR, Site-specific) State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City RO WPGW842 0004198935 Gem State Communications, Inc.
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297624A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297624A1.txt
      • HOLDINGS IIIRichardson 04/14/2010 21975.00000 32-56-09.2 N TX MD WQLL787 096-43-16.5 W 0004211476 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIRichardson 04/14/2010 22025.00000 32-56-09.2 N TX MD WQLL787 096-43-16.5 W 0004211476 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIRichardson 04/14/2010 22225.00000 32-56-09.2 N TX MD WQLL787 096-43-16.5 W 0004211476 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIRichardson 04/14/2010 22325.00000 32-56-09.2 N PA MD WQLJ284 076-58-07.0 W 0004211825 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHampden 04/15/2010 19375.00000 40-14-01.3 N PA MD WQLJ284 076-58-07.0 W 0004211825 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHampden 04/15/2010 19425.00000 40-14-01.3 N Page 28 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City PA MD WQLJ284 076-58-07.0 W 0004211825 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHampden 04/15/2010 19475.00000 40-14-01.3 N PA MD WQLJ284 076-58-07.0 W 0004211825 CLEARWIRE
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297625A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297625A1.txt
      • W 0004215211 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIBOSTON 04/16/2010 19425.00000 42-23-55.7 N MA NE 071-14-24.3 W 0004215211 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIBOSTON 04/16/2010 19575.00000 42-23-55.7 N MA NE 071-14-24.3 W 0004215211 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIBOSTON 04/16/2010 23025.00000 42-23-55.7 N MA NE 071-14-24.3 W 0004215211 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIBOSTON 04/16/2010 23125.00000 42-23-55.7 N MA NE 071-17-44.9 W 0004215212 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIBEDFORD 04/16/2010 10775.00000 42-29-01.3 N MA NE 071-17-44.9 W 0004215212 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIBEDFORD 04/16/2010 10855.00000 42-29-01.3 N MA NE 071-17-44.9 W 0004215212 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIBEDFORD 04/16/2010 10895.00000 42-29-01.3 N Page 24 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MA NE 071-03-53.7 W 0004215213 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIBoston
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297769A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297769A1.txt
      • 10735.00000 36-07-09.0 N NC AM WQEP452 079-28-29.0 W 0004209072 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings, LLC Burlington 04/20/2010 10815.00000 36-07-09.0 N NC AM WQEP452 079-28-29.0 W 0004209072 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings, LLC Burlington 04/20/2010 10935.00000 36-07-09.0 N NC AM WQEP452 079-28-29.0 W 0004209072 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings, LLC Burlington 04/20/2010 23175.00000 36-07-09.0 N PA AM WQLJ284 076-58-07.0 W 0004211825 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHampden 04/20/2010 19375.00000 40-14-01.3 N PA AM WQLJ284 076-58-07.0 W 0004211825 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHampden 04/20/2010 19425.00000 40-14-01.3 N Page 11 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City PA AM WQLJ284 076-58-07.0 W 0004211825 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHampden 04/20/2010 19475.00000 40-14-01.3 N PA AM WQLJ284 076-58-07.0 W 0004211825 CLEARWIRE
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297770A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297770A1.txt
      • NC MD WQJD992 080-52-00.3 W 0004220566 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II PINESVILLE 04/21/2010 19675.00000 35-05-35.1 N NC MD WQKY609 080-50-34.6 W 0004220568 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHuntersville 04/21/2010 11385.00000 35-22-41.6 N NC MD WQKY609 080-50-34.6 W 0004220568 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHuntersville 04/21/2010 19525.00000 35-22-41.6 N NC MD WQKY609 080-50-34.6 W 0004220568 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHuntersville 04/21/2010 19625.00000 35-22-41.6 N NC MD WQJE213 080-53-01.3 W 0004220569 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II CHARLOTTE 04/21/2010 17765.00000 35-16-09.7 N NC MD WQJE213 080-53-01.3 W 0004220569 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II CHARLOTTE 04/21/2010 19425.00000 35-16-09.7 N NC MD WQKY598 080-58-23.0 W 0004220570 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICHARLOTTE 04/21/2010 23025.00000 35-09-47.0 N NC MD WQKY598 080-58-23.0 W 0004220570 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICHARLOTTE 04/21/2010 23125.00000 35-09-47.0 N NC MD WQJE337 080-44-03.8 W 0004220571
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297771A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297771A1.txt
      • Latitude City NC MD WQKY593 080-37-02.3 W 0004221006 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIIndian Trail 04/22/2010 10855.00000 35-03-40.3 N NC MD WQKY593 080-37-02.3 W 0004221006 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIIndian Trail 04/22/2010 10935.00000 35-03-40.3 N NC MD WQKY593 080-37-02.3 W 0004221006 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIIndian Trail 04/22/2010 11015.00000 35-03-40.3 N NC MD WQKY596 080-40-59.0 W 0004221007 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIIndian Trail 04/22/2010 11425.00000 35-04-01.3 N NC MD WQKY596 080-40-59.0 W 0004221007 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIIndian Trail 04/22/2010 11465.00000 35-04-01.3 N NC MD WQKY596 080-40-59.0 W 0004221007 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIIndian Trail 04/22/2010 11505.00000 35-04-01.3 N NC MD WQKY596 080-40-59.0 W 0004221007 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIIndian Trail 04/22/2010 11545.00000 35-04-01.3 N NC MD WQLB261 080-41-44.4 W 0004221008 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICharlotte 04/22/2010 17815.00000 35-17-13.7 N
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297887A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297887A1.txt
      • LLC DRAPER 04/26/2010 10895.00000 40-32-02.4 N CO NE 105-08-11.6 W 0004224727 First Bank Main Lakewood 04/26/2010 21820.00000 39-44-27.7 N CO NE 105-08-11.6 W 0004224727 First Bank Main Lakewood 04/26/2010 21920.00000 39-44-27.7 N CO NE 105-08-21.8 W 0004224728 First Bank Main Lakewood 04/26/2010 23120.00000 39-44-25.7 N CO NE 105-06-56.3 W 0004224729 First Bank Main Lakewood 04/26/2010 23020.00000 39-44-27.1 N CO NE 106-50-01.3 W 0004224730 Resort Broadband, LLC Steamboat Springs 04/26/2010 17815.00000 40-29-10.0 N CO NE 106-50-01.3 W 0004224730 Resort Broadband, LLC Steamboat Springs 04/26/2010 17915.00000 40-29-10.0 N NJ NE 073-59-24.0 W 0004225011 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILeonia 04/27/2010 23475.00000 40-51-31.0 N NJ NE 073-59-24.0 W 0004225011 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILeonia 04/27/2010 23575.00000 40-51-31.0 N NJ NE 074-00-02.8 W 0004225012 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIITEANECK
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298039A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298039A1.txt
      • WQEH244 104-47-52.0 W 0004233527 FiberTower Network Services Corp. Colorado Springs 05/04/2010 23070.00000 38-53-47.0 N CO MD WQEH244 104-47-52.0 W 0004233527 FiberTower Network Services Corp. Colorado Springs 05/04/2010 23075.00000 38-53-47.0 N CO MD WQEH244 104-47-52.0 W 0004233527 FiberTower Network Services Corp. Colorado Springs 05/04/2010 23170.00000 38-53-47.0 N CO MD WQED916 104-49-31.6 W 0004233528 FiberTower Network Services Corp. Colorado Springs 05/04/2010 10715.00000 38-50-01.3 N CO MD WQED916 104-49-31.6 W 0004233528 FiberTower Network Services Corp. Colorado Springs 05/04/2010 11115.00000 38-50-01.3 N CO MD WQED916 104-49-31.6 W 0004233528 FiberTower Network Services Corp. Colorado Springs 05/04/2010 11155.00000 38-50-01.3 N CO MD WQED916 104-49-31.6 W 0004233528 FiberTower Network Services Corp. Colorado Springs 05/04/2010 11185.00000 38-50-01.3 N CO MD WQED916 104-49-31.6 W 0004233528 FiberTower Network Services Corp. Colorado
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298239A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298239A1.txt
      • (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MI MD WHS315 086-15-37.0 W 0004239370 GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY MUSKEGON 05/10/2010 00950.00000 43-08-03.0 N FL MD WPOP968 081-51-18.3 W 0004239713 MERIDIAN BROADCASTING, INC. FT Myers 05/10/2010 00944.50000 26-39-04.2 N OR MD WQHD795 122-54-08.1 W 0004240919 UCB USA, INC. MEDFORD 05/11/2010 00945.00000 42-20-30.4 N NY MD WJN20 073-42-01.8 W 0004241476 WMHT EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICTROY 05/11/2010 00950.00000 42-41-01.3 N MT MD WGZ696 114-16-46.6 W 0004241832 KALISPELL CHRISTIAN RADIO FELLOWKALISPELL 05/11/2010 00950.00000 48-14-22.2 N NY NE 078-25-48.5 W 0004240870 COLONIAL RADIO GROUP, INC. Olean 05/11/2010 00947.50000 42-04-45.8 N NY NE 078-25-48.5 W 0004240870 COLONIAL RADIO GROUP, INC. Olean 05/11/2010 00951.12500 42-04-45.8 N OH NE 083-14-11.0 W 0004241503 KAYSER BROADCAST MINISTRIES, INCUPPER SANDUSKY 05/11/2010 00947.00000 40-50-10.0 N CF - Common
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298389A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298389A1.txt
      • CA NE 121-23-30.4 W 0004251002 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIElk Grove 05/18/2010 23175.00000 38-25-11.9 N FL NE 080-04-31.7 W 0004251334 H & R Production Group, Inc. W. PALM BEACH 05/18/2010 19435.00000 26-47-59.7 N FL NE 080-04-41.2 W 0004251398 H & R Production Group, Inc. Riviera Beach 05/18/2010 17875.00000 26-47-03.5 N PA NE 076-52-18.9 W 0004252489 TEXAS EASTERN COMMUNICATIONS IFROGTOWN 05/18/2010 06286.19000 40-11-01.3 N PA NE 076-46-46.9 W 0004252490 TEXAS EASTERN COMMUNICATIONS IHighspire 05/18/2010 06034.15000 40-13-07.9 N RO WNTE497 0004250835 SHELL COMMUNICATIONS INC 05/18/2010 RO WNTE498 0004250836 SHELL COMMUNICATIONS INC 05/18/2010 RO WNTE499 0004250837 SHELL COMMUNICATIONS INC 05/18/2010 RO WAY467 0004250838 SHELL COMMUNICATIONS INC 05/18/2010 RO KNC32 0004250849 Panella Trucking, Inc. 05/18/2010 RO KNC33 0004250939 Panella Trucking, Inc. 05/18/2010 Page 53 MG -
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298390A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298390A1.txt
      • Oaks 05/18/2010 19375.00000 38-39-12.6 N CA NE 121-17-25.7 W 0004251290 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIFair Oaks 05/18/2010 19475.00000 38-39-12.6 N CA NE 121-24-52.5 W 0004251291 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISacramento 05/18/2010 21875.00000 38-35-57.9 N CA NE 121-24-52.5 W 0004251291 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISacramento 05/18/2010 21925.00000 38-35-57.9 N CA NE 121-24-52.5 W 0004251291 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISacramento 05/18/2010 22075.00000 38-35-57.9 N CA NE 121-10-01.3 W 0004251292 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIFolsom 05/18/2010 10775.00000 38-38-36.9 N CA NE 121-10-01.3 W 0004251292 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIFolsom 05/18/2010 19375.00000 38-38-36.9 N CA NE 121-10-01.3 W 0004251292 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIFolsom 05/18/2010 19475.00000 38-38-36.9 N Page 44 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298391A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298391A1.txt
      • N VA AM WQLH464 077-07-04.7 W 0004234528 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIArlington 05/21/2010 19525.00000 38-53-00.7 N VA AM WQLH464 077-07-04.7 W 0004234528 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIArlington 05/21/2010 19625.00000 38-53-00.7 N TX MD WEG471 095-54-24.0 W 0004255134 ENTERGY SERVICES, INC SHIRO 05/21/2010 02188.00000 30-37-31.0 N TX MD WEG471 095-54-24.0 W 0004255134 ENTERGY SERVICES, INC SHIRO 05/21/2010 06585.00000 30-37-31.0 N NJ MD WQLW626 074-43-01.3 W 0004255395 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILawrence 05/21/2010 17765.00000 40-15-54.6 N NJ MD WQLW626 074-43-01.3 W 0004255395 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILawrence 05/21/2010 21875.00000 40-15-54.6 N NJ MD WQLW626 074-43-01.3 W 0004255395 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILawrence 05/21/2010 22075.00000 40-15-54.6 N NJ MD WQLV976 074-43-24.9 W 0004255506 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILawrenceville 05/21/2010 21875.00000 40-17-09.7 N NJ MD WQLV976 074-43-24.9 W 0004255506 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298677A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298677A1.txt
      • PARTNERSHIP SHELBYVILLE 06/04/2010 39-47-55.1 N CO MD KNKN554 105-56-50.7 W 0004266282 WWC HOLDING CO., INC. La Jara 06/01/2010 37-14-46.5 N TX MD KNKN369 097-50-49.2 W 0004266512 TEXAS RSA 6 LIMITED PARTNERSHIPBOWIE 06/01/2010 33-31-41.0 N TX MD KNKN369 098-22-51.8 W 0004266512 TEXAS RSA 6 LIMITED PARTNERSHIPBryson 06/01/2010 33-10-41.5 N TX MD KNKN369 097-18-08.7 W 0004266512 TEXAS RSA 6 LIMITED PARTNERSHIPEra 06/01/2010 33-30-01.3 N TX MD KNKN369 097-34-00.1 W 0004266512 TEXAS RSA 6 LIMITED PARTNERSHIPFORESTBURG 06/01/2010 33-32-20.1 N TX MD KNKN369 098-28-51.7 W 0004266512 TEXAS RSA 6 LIMITED PARTNERSHIPGRAFORD 06/01/2010 32-51-49.9 N TX MD KNKN369 098-22-51.1 W 0004266512 TEXAS RSA 6 LIMITED PARTNERSHIPGRAFORD 06/01/2010 32-54-56.0 N TX MD KNKN369 098-11-03.6 W 0004266512 TEXAS RSA 6 LIMITED PARTNERSHIPJacksboro 06/01/2010 33-11-31.6 N OK MD KNKN369
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298678A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298678A1.txt
      • Park 06/02/2010 18065.00000 34-04-52.3 N CA NE 118-13-10.5 W 0004266878 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILos Angeles 06/02/2010 23175.00000 34-07-23.2 N CA NE 117-49-50.3 W 0004266880 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIWalnut 06/02/2010 19425.00000 34-02-28.7 N CA NE 117-49-50.3 W 0004266880 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIWalnut 06/02/2010 23125.00000 34-02-28.7 N CA NE 118-06-41.3 W 0004266881 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIPasadena 06/02/2010 21825.00000 34-08-59.7 N CA NE 117-46-01.3 W 0004266885 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIPomona 06/02/2010 21925.00000 34-04-05.2 N CA NE 118-29-59.8 W 0004266887 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISanta Monica 06/02/2010 18015.00000 34-01-06.1 N CA NE 118-29-59.8 W 0004266887 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISanta Monica 06/02/2010 18115.00000 34-01-06.1 N CA NE 118-29-59.8 W 0004266887 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISanta Monica 06/02/2010 22075.00000 34-01-06.1 N CA NE 117-45-26.5 W 0004266890 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298679A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298679A1.txt
      • ANGELES 06/02/2010 23025.00000 34-06-08.3 N CA NE 118-28-54.1 W 0004268895 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISanta Monica 06/02/2010 22025.00000 34-01-06.8 N CA NE 118-03-23.1 W 0004268896 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIIndustry 06/02/2010 19575.00000 34-00-53.0 N CA NE 117-51-38.2 W 0004268897 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICovina 06/02/2010 23125.00000 34-04-07.8 N CA NE 117-51-38.2 W 0004268897 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICovina 06/02/2010 23225.00000 34-04-07.8 N CA NE 118-01-01.3 W 0004268901 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIMonrovia 06/02/2010 23125.00000 34-08-54.1 N CA NE 118-21-05.8 W 0004268904 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIBurbank 06/02/2010 23025.00000 34-09-57.8 N CA NE 118-21-05.8 W 0004268904 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIBurbank 06/02/2010 23125.00000 34-09-57.8 N CA NE 118-13-25.6 W 0004268906 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILos Angeles 06/02/2010 23025.00000 34-04-04.3 N CA NE 118-00-29.2 W 0004268909 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIArcadia 06/02/2010
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298680A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298680A1.txt
      • HOLDINGS IIIChino 06/03/2010 17815.00000 34-01-37.1 N CA MD WQLU921 117-43-38.1 W 0004269603 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIChino 06/03/2010 17915.00000 34-01-37.1 N CA MD WQLU921 117-43-38.1 W 0004269603 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIChino 06/03/2010 18015.00000 34-01-37.1 N CA MD WQLU921 117-43-38.1 W 0004269603 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIChino 06/03/2010 18115.00000 34-01-37.1 N CA MD WQLN817 119-48-46.8 W 0004269611 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIGoleta 06/03/2010 17815.00000 34-26-01.3 N Page 17 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA MD WQLN817 119-48-46.8 W 0004269611 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIGoleta 06/03/2010 17915.00000 34-26-01.3 N CA MD WQLN817 119-48-46.8 W 0004269611 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIGoleta 06/03/2010 19575.00000 34-26-01.3 N CA MD WQLN817 119-48-46.8 W 0004269611 CLEARWIRE
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298708A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298708A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298708A1.txt
      • trying to achieve in the National Broadband Plan. I am pleased that some Silicon Valley leaders are speaking out on this, and encouraging experiments with new platforms, business models and technology tools. But an increase of technology does not by itself guarantee a more informed citizenry. A 2009 study indicates that, as a country, we now consume in excess of 1.3 trillion hours of media per year. Yet the production and distribution of essential news and information have never been more in doubt. A recent Pew Research Center report shows a fifty percent decline in network news reporting and editing capacity since the 1980s, and a 30 percent drop for newspapers since 2000. New media has not found the model to
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298794A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298794A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298794A1.txt
      • Number Type of Change(s) Planned Location of Change(s) ATT20100210L.2 Copper Facilities which feed an area in Winchester, Kentucky along State Highway 1950 (Ecton Road) from State Highway 402 (The Mountain Parkway) to a point 0.8 miles past Morris Rd; along Cabin Creek Rd from Hwy 1950 a distance of 0.9 miles; along Morris Rd from Hwy 1950 a distance of 1.3 miles; along Little Stoner Rd from Hwy 1950 a distance of 0.6 miles will be replaced with fiber fed digital loop carrier. Winchester, KY The network change(s) identified herein shall not be implemented within six months of the date of notice provided to the public under section 51.329(a). See 47 C.F.R. � 51.331(a)(1); see also 47 C.F.R. � 51.329(a). Incumbent
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298838A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298838A1.txt
      • Texas LLC HAMILTON 06/08/2010 31-31-41.9 N TX MD KNKA702 097-24-07.5 W 0004274501 AT&T Mobility Texas LLC HOLLAND 06/08/2010 30-52-08.9 N TX MD KNKA702 097-45-13.1 W 0004274501 AT&T Mobility Texas LLC KILLEEN 06/08/2010 31-05-52.6 N TX MD KNKA702 098-10-35.5 W 0004274501 AT&T Mobility Texas LLC LAMPASAS 06/08/2010 31-22-14.1 N TX MD KNKA702 097-29-25.9 W 0004274501 AT&T Mobility Texas LLC MOODY 06/08/2010 31-14-01.3 N TX MD KNKA702 097-28-47.1 W 0004274501 AT&T Mobility Texas LLC Oglesby 06/08/2010 31-26-11.6 N TX MD KNKA702 097-55-08.1 W 0004274501 AT&T Mobility Texas LLC PIDCOKE 06/08/2010 31-15-42.6 N TX MD KNKA702 097-37-51.8 W 0004274501 AT&T Mobility Texas LLC SALADO 06/08/2010 30-59-09.7 N TX MD KNKA702 097-19-39.2 W 0004274501 AT&T Mobility Texas LLC Temple 06/08/2010 30-59-06.9 N TX MD KNKA702
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298840A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298840A1.txt
      • NE 082-34-56.1 W 0004278374 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIITAMPA 06/11/2010 19525.00000 28-00-50.1 N FL NE 082-34-56.1 W 0004278374 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIITAMPA 06/11/2010 19625.00000 28-00-50.1 N Page 19 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City FL NE 082-25-57.2 W 0004278375 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIITampa 06/11/2010 11015.00000 28-02-01.3 N FL NE 082-25-57.2 W 0004278375 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIITampa 06/11/2010 11135.00000 28-02-01.3 N FL NE 082-25-57.2 W 0004278375 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIITampa 06/11/2010 19375.00000 28-02-01.3 N FL NE 082-25-57.2 W 0004278375 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIITampa 06/11/2010 19475.00000 28-02-01.3 N FL NE 082-25-57.2 W 0004278375 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIITampa 06/11/2010 19525.00000 28-02-01.3 N FL NE 082-25-57.2 W 0004278375 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298933A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298933A1.txt
      • 06/15/2010 00130.60000 25-47-43.3 N FL NE 082-16-18.4 W 0004283729 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc Gainesville 06/15/2010 00128.85000 29-41-24.2 N ID NE 114-29-15.9 W 0004283775 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc Twin Falls 06/15/2010 00130.25000 42-28-54.5 N MN NE 093-13-18.4 W 0004283834 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc Minneapolis 06/15/2010 00131.60000 44-52-55.0 N TX NE 098-28-11.2 W 0004283895 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc San Antonio 06/15/2010 00131.95000 29-32-01.3 N OR NE 122-35-50.9 W 0004283987 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc Portland 06/15/2010 00128.92500 45-35-18.7 N CO NE 105-09-49.4 W 0004284039 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc Longmont 06/15/2010 00130.00000 40-09-51.5 N NY NE 076-53-29.8 W 0004284096 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc Elmira 06/15/2010 00130.75000 42-09-35.6 N MI NE 083-21-12.2 W 0004284107 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc Detroit 06/15/2010 00129.00000 42-12-44.8 N MI NE 083-21-12.2
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298934A1.txt
      • 29-41-07.0 N TX AM WQEM772 096-54-34.8 W 0004239698 FiberTower Network Services Corp. CARROLLTON 06/17/2010 17820.00000 32-57-02.2 N TX AM WQEM772 096-54-34.8 W 0004239698 FiberTower Network Services Corp. CARROLLTON 06/17/2010 17980.00000 32-57-02.2 N TX AM WQEM772 096-54-34.8 W 0004239698 FiberTower Network Services Corp. CARROLLTON 06/17/2010 18000.00000 32-57-02.2 N TX AM WQEM500 096-55-13.3 W 0004239700 FiberTower Network Services Corp. CARROLLTON 06/17/2010 19400.00000 32-58-01.3 N Page 5 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TX AM WQEM500 096-55-13.3 W 0004239700 FiberTower Network Services Corp. CARROLLTON 06/17/2010 19540.00000 32-58-01.3 N TX AM WQEM500 096-55-13.3 W 0004239700 FiberTower Network Services Corp. CARROLLTON 06/17/2010 19560.00000 32-58-01.3 N CA
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299052A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299052A1.txt
      • 3.0 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.2 Nine 2.8 2.7 2.8 2.7 2.9 2.6 2.7 2.8 Ten or More 36.9 35.0 35.3 34.0 33.5 33.1 33.6 44.7 Zero 2.2% 2.4% 2.3% 2.4% 2.4% 2.8% 2.6% 0.4% One 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.4 2.6 2.4 0.9 Two 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.4 2.4 1.2 Three 2.2 2.3 2.2 2.4 2.3 2.5 2.4 1.3 Four 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.2 2.2 1.3 Five 2.2 2.2 2.0 2.4 2.5 2.2 2.2 1.6 Six 1.9 2.2 1.9 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.1 1.7 Seven 2.0 2.4 2.2 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.3 1.8 Eight 2.6 2.5 2.3 2.5 2.4 2.8 2.8 1.7 Nine 2.4 2.7 2.7 2.5 2.8 2.8 2.7 1.6 Ten or More 77.9 76.8 77.4
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299296A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299296A1.txt
      • 00948.50000 38-11-45.0 N KY MD WMU221 085-41-04.0 W 0004295262 CLEAR CHANNEL BROADCASTING LICLOUISVILLE 06/22/2010 00949.50000 38-11-45.0 N NV MD WHS625 115-07-57.8 W 0004295966 KJUL LICENSE, LLC Las Vegas 06/23/2010 00949.50000 36-06-01.2 N NV MD WHF342 115-07-57.7 W 0004295982 KJUL LICENSE, LLC Las Vegas 06/23/2010 00947.00000 36-06-01.4 N NV MD WAW490 115-08-00.7 W 0004295990 KDWN LICENSE LIMITED PARTNERSHILas Vegas 06/23/2010 00949.00000 36-06-01.3 N PA MD WLO273 076-57-18.1 W 0004297810 HENSLEY BROADCASTING, INC. Shiremanstown 06/24/2010 00944.37500 40-13-22.4 N PA MD WLO273 076-57-18.1 W 0004297810 HENSLEY BROADCASTING, INC. Shiremanstown 06/24/2010 00944.62500 40-13-22.4 N ID NE 114-31-07.8 W 0004289748 MARIA ELENA JUAREZ Jerome 06/21/2010 00951.62500 42-43-12.2 N ID NE 114-31-07.8 W 0004289867 MARIA E. JUAREZ Jerome 06/21/2010 00947.00000 42-43-12.2 N KY NE 085-41-04.0 W 0004294935
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299557A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299557A1.txt
      • Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TN MD KNKA576 087-16-20.0 W 0004302340 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCCLARKSVILLE 06/29/2010 36-35-22.2 N KY MD KNKA576 087-27-47.2 W 0004302340 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCCrofton 06/29/2010 37-04-49.8 N TN MD KNKA576 087-23-05.6 W 0004302340 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCCUNNINGHAM 06/29/2010 36-23-13.1 N KY MD KNKA576 087-41-01.3 W 0004302340 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCFORT CAMPBELL 06/29/2010 36-38-47.8 N KY MD KNKA576 087-38-01.6 W 0004302340 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCHopkinsville 06/29/2010 36-48-46.2 N KY MD KNKA576 087-24-20.4 W 0004302340 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCHOPKINSVILLE 06/29/2010 36-48-34.1 N KY MD KNKA576 087-28-35.0 W 0004302340 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCHOPKINSVILLE 06/29/2010 36-55-36.2 N KY MD KNKA576 087-26-01.0 W 0004302340 NEW
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299558A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299558A1.txt
      • MD WPNL366 116-37-36.0 W 0004302283 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership DAGGETT 06/29/2010 06855.00000 34-38-38.9 N CA MD WPJD366 118-07-07.3 W 0004302291 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership PASADENA 06/29/2010 18000.00000 34-09-00.0 N CA MD WPJD366 118-07-07.3 W 0004302291 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership PASADENA 06/29/2010 18115.00000 34-09-00.0 N ME MD KCK73 069-07-45.1 W 0004302412 Northern New England Telephone OperatROCKLAND 06/29/2010 10795.00000 44-08-01.3 N ME MD KCK73 069-07-45.1 W 0004302412 Northern New England Telephone OperatROCKLAND 06/29/2010 10895.00000 44-08-01.3 N ME MD KCK73 069-07-45.1 W 0004302412 Northern New England Telephone OperatROCKLAND 06/29/2010 10935.00000 44-08-01.3 N ME MD KCK73 069-07-45.1 W 0004302412 Northern New England Telephone OperatROCKLAND 06/29/2010 10975.00000 44-08-01.3 N ME MD KCK73 069-07-45.1 W 0004302412 Northern New England Telephone OperatROCKLAND 06/29/2010 11015.00000 44-08-01.3
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299733A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299733A1.txt
      • W 0004315630 Abraham Divestiture Company LLC DULCE 07/07/2010 06845.00000 36-59-01.9 N NM MD WQFJ770 107-26-23.7 W 0004315632 Abraham Divestiture Company LLC Counselor 07/07/2010 06805.00000 36-28-35.5 N NM MD WQGG379 107-30-25.8 W 0004315634 Abraham Divestiture Company LLC Middle Mesa 07/07/2010 06785.00000 36-59-09.8 N NM MD WQHA603 108-08-45.7 W 0004315638 Abraham Divestiture Company LLC Farmington 07/07/2010 11005.00000 36-44-59.3 N NV MD WPJD342 115-51-01.3 W 0004315839 Abraham Divestiture Company LLC ELKO 07/08/2010 06152.75000 40-55-18.7 N NV MD WPJD342 115-51-01.3 W 0004315839 Abraham Divestiture Company LLC ELKO 07/08/2010 06197.24000 40-55-18.7 N NV MD WPJD342 115-51-01.3 W 0004315839 Abraham Divestiture Company LLC ELKO 07/08/2010 06226.89000 40-55-18.7 N NV MD WPJD342 115-51-01.3 W 0004315839 Abraham Divestiture Company LLC ELKO 07/08/2010 06315.84000 40-55-18.7 N NV MD WPJD342 115-51-01.3
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299735A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299735A1.txt
      • Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MD WPHE953 A 0004315182 ALLEN, CAROL J 07/07/2010 00806.00000 - 00821.00000 MD WPHE953 A 0004315182 ALLEN, CAROL J 07/07/2010 00809.00000 - 00824.00000 CA MD WPHE953 X 0004315182 ALLEN, CAROL J 07/07/2010 00806.00000 - 00821.00000 NY MD WPHE953 073-45-42.4 W 0004315182 ALLEN, CAROL J ALBANY 07/07/2010 00851.43750 42-38-01.3 N NY MD WPHE953 073-45-42.4 W 0004315182 ALLEN, CAROL J ALBANY 07/07/2010 00860.56250 42-38-01.3 N IK - Industrial/Business Pool - Commercial, Conventional State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MN AM WPYK991 094-40-49.0 W 0004278500 PASKVAN, ROGER Baudette 07/07/2010 00152.48000 48-42-48.0 N MN AM WPYK991 094-40-49.0 W 0004278500 PASKVAN, ROGER
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299965A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299965A1.txt
      • N AZ MD WPNG347 111-23-45.3 W 0004322835 Abraham Divestiture Company LLC PICACHO 07/14/2010 06145.34000 32-39-02.4 N SD MD WMQ913 100-24-27.8 W 0004325199 Peach Acquisitions LLC PIERRE 07/16/2010 06226.89000 44-22-21.7 N SD MD WMQ913 100-24-27.8 W 0004325199 Peach Acquisitions LLC PIERRE 07/16/2010 06345.49000 44-22-21.7 N SD MD WMQ913 100-24-27.8 W 0004325199 Peach Acquisitions LLC PIERRE 07/16/2010 06595.00000 44-22-21.7 N SC NE 081-38-01.3 W 0004319413 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC PACELET 07/12/2010 06226.89000 34-55-34.9 N MN NE 093-26-56.6 W 0004319524 Citilink Communications, LLC Minneapolis 07/12/2010 10715.00000 44-59-44.1 N MN NE 093-26-56.6 W 0004319524 Citilink Communications, LLC Minneapolis 07/12/2010 11525.00000 44-59-44.1 N PR NE 065-57-01.8 W 0004319801 T-MOBILE PUERTO RICO LLC Carolina 07/12/2010 21875.00000 18-23-58.0 N MN NE 093-54-31.9 W 0004320063 Peach Acquisitions LLC Easton
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299968A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299968A1.txt
      • Wyandotte 07/12/2010 17995.00000 42-13-06.0 N WA NE 120-18-40.0 W 0004319598 Rivercom911 East Wenatchee 07/12/2010 06675.62500 47-25-18.0 N AZ NE 111-58-06.1 W 0004323255 Phoenix, City of Phoenix 07/14/2010 06735.00000 33-28-49.8 N PA NE 076-19-04.9 W 0004323991 Red Rose Transit Authority Manheim 07/15/2010 19405.00000 40-03-50.8 N PA NE 076-18-21.4 W 0004323992 Red Rose Transit Authority Lancaster 07/15/2010 17845.00000 40-02-31.5 N CA NE 119-40-01.3 W 0004324038 KINGS COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATIOHanford 07/15/2010 22125.00000 36-19-58.5 N CA NE 119-40-01.3 W 0004324038 KINGS COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATIOHanford 07/15/2010 22175.00000 36-19-58.5 N CA NE 119-40-01.3 W 0004324038 KINGS COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATIOHanford 07/15/2010 22275.00000 36-19-58.5 N CA NE 119-40-01.3 W 0004324038 KINGS COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATIOHanford 07/15/2010 22325.00000 36-19-58.5 N NJ NE 074-50-19.6 W 0004324054 COUNTY OF
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300380A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300380A1.txt
      • subject to the pre-grant notice and petition procedure of Section 309 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, that were accepted for filing. AS - Aural Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NV MD WAW490 115-08-00.7 W 0004329783 KDWN LICENSE LIMITED PARTNERSHILas Vegas 07/20/2010 00949.00000 36-06-01.3 N AL NE 087-34-03.0 W 0004329272 LAWSON OF TUSCALOOSA, INC. Tuscaloosa 07/20/2010 00946.00000 33-12-31.0 N CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NC AM WLV807 082-33-41.5 W 0004260987 NORTH CAROLINA RSA #4, INC. ASHEVLLE 07/20/2010 06377.61000 35-35-36.4 N NC AM WLV807
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300397A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300397A1.txt
      • SERVICE 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 800KG7D Points of Communication: VSAPRO2X-GM GROUP - PAS-3R - (43.0 W.L.) E000290 SES-RWL-20100723-00954 E Date Effective: 07/26/2010 Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Grant of Authority 08/24/2010 - 08/24/2025 Renewal Visa International Service Association Nature of Service: Domestic Fixed Satellite Service 18 � 22 ' 48.80 " N LAT. SITE ID: VSAPRO1X CARRETERA 176 KM 1.3 CUPEY CENTER, RIO PIEDRAS, PR 66 � 3 ' 16.60 " W LONG. LOCATION: Page 43 of 47 PRODELIN 1 2.4 meters ANTENNA ID: 1251 45.10 dBW QPSK DIGITAL DATA SERVICE 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 800KG7D QPSK DIGITAL DATA SERVICE 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 800KG7D Points of Communication: VSAPRO1X - PAS-3R - (43.0 W.L.) E000488 SES-RWL-20100726-00956 E Date Effective: 07/26/2010
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300669A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300669A1.txt
      • 075-35-37.8 W 0004287018 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCSCRANTON 07/26/2010 10627.50000 41-22-52.3 N PA AM WPNB829 075-35-37.8 W 0004287018 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCSCRANTON 07/26/2010 10628.12500 41-22-52.3 N NV AM WMQ844 116-18-38.3 W 0004314752 Abraham Divestiture Company LLC EUREKA 07/27/2010 06123.10000 40-56-34.7 N NV AM WMQ844 116-18-38.3 W 0004314752 Abraham Divestiture Company LLC EUREKA 07/27/2010 06162.63000 40-56-34.7 N NV AM WPJD342 115-51-01.3 W 0004315839 Abraham Divestiture Company LLC ELKO 07/27/2010 06152.75000 40-55-18.7 N NV AM WPJD342 115-51-01.3 W 0004315839 Abraham Divestiture Company LLC ELKO 07/27/2010 06197.24000 40-55-18.7 N NV AM WPJD342 115-51-01.3 W 0004315839 Abraham Divestiture Company LLC ELKO 07/27/2010 06226.89000 40-55-18.7 N NV AM WPJD342 115-51-01.3 W 0004315839 Abraham Divestiture Company LLC ELKO 07/27/2010 06315.84000 40-55-18.7 N NV AM WPJD342 115-51-01.3
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300783A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300783A1.txt
      • PCS, LLCADAIRVILLE 08/03/2010 36-40-56.0 N KY MD KNKN748 086-14-13.9 W 0004343001 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCANNETA 08/03/2010 37-24-18.2 N KY MD KNKN748 086-26-54.9 W 0004343001 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCBowling Green 08/03/2010 36-59-56.8 N KY MD KNKN748 086-04-57.8 W 0004343001 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCBradenburg 08/03/2010 37-56-59.6 N KY MD KNKN748 086-09-28.7 W 0004343001 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCBrandenburg 08/03/2010 37-59-01.3 N KY MD KNKN748 086-19-20.3 W 0004343001 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCBrandenburg 08/03/2010 38-00-08.4 N Page 29 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City KY MD KNKN748 086-11-31.9 W 0004343001 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCBROWNSVILLE 08/03/2010 37-06-13.5 N KY MD KNKN748 086-15-59.7 W 0004343001 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301113A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301113A1.txt
      • TX MD KNKN727 100-37-18.3 W 0004354085 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC SONORA 08/16/2010 30-33-22.3 N OR MD KNKA722 122-35-56.8 W 0004354806 Medford Cellular Telephone Company, IncASHLAND 08/16/2010 42-03-05.3 N OR MD KNKA722 122-28-43.9 W 0004354806 Medford Cellular Telephone Company, IncASHLAND 08/16/2010 42-03-53.0 N OR MD KNKA722 123--04.1 W 0004354806 Medford Cellular Telephone Company, IncBLACKWELL 08/16/2010 42-25-40.4 N OR MD KNKA722 122-50-01.3 W 0004354806 Medford Cellular Telephone Company, IncEagle Point 08/16/2010 42-29-38.2 N OR MD KNKA722 123-00-25.2 W 0004354806 Medford Cellular Telephone Company, IncJacksonville 08/16/2010 42-17-09.4 N OR MD KNKA722 122-22-54.1 W 0004354806 Medford Cellular Telephone Company, IncMedford 08/16/2010 42-21-51.5 N OR MD KNKA722 123-00-19.5 W 0004354806 Medford Cellular Telephone Company, IncMEDFORD 08/16/2010 42-17-12.6 N OR MD KNKA722 122-45-06.1 W 0004354806 Medford
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301114A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301114A1.txt
      • 41-50-00.3 N CT NE 072-36-11.2 W 0004354220 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISouth Windsor 08/16/2010 10975.00000 41-50-00.3 N CT NE 072-36-11.2 W 0004354220 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISouth Windsor 08/16/2010 11015.00000 41-50-00.3 N CT NE 072-36-11.2 W 0004354220 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISouth Windsor 08/16/2010 11055.00000 41-50-00.3 N CT NE 072-36-11.2 W 0004354220 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISouth Windsor 08/16/2010 11095.00000 41-50-00.3 N CT NE 072-38-01.3 W 0004354221 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIEast Hartford 08/16/2010 23025.00000 41-44-32.6 N CT NE 072-38-01.3 W 0004354221 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIEast Hartford 08/16/2010 23125.00000 41-44-32.6 N Page 39 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CT NE 072-54-10.9 W 0004354222 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIBristol 08/16/2010 23325.00000
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301115A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301115A1.txt
      • CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCTULSA 08/19/2010 36-22-47.6 N OK MD KNKA356 095-25-05.5 W 0004359582 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCWAGONER 08/19/2010 35-57-48.8 N Page 13 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NY MD KNKA486 075-51-46.0 W 0004360534 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCBinghamton 08/20/2010 42-06-49.0 N NY MD KNKA486 076-22-01.3 W 0004360534 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCCANDOR 08/20/2010 42-14-54.5 N NY MD KNKA486 075-53-27.7 W 0004360534 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCCHENANGO BRIDG 08/20/2010 42-10-15.3 N PA MD KNKA486 075-38-41.5 W 0004360534 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCCLIFFORD 08/20/2010 41-38-36.5 N NY MD KNKA486 075-26-59.3 W 0004360534 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCDeposit 08/20/2010 42-02-00.5 N NY MD KNKA486 075-24-24.6 W 0004360534 NEW
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301116A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301116A1.txt
      • LAKE ELSINORE 08/19/2010 10935.00000 33-36-07.4 N CA AM WQCI945 117-20-38.8 W 0004290478 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership LAKE ELSINORE 08/19/2010 11055.00000 33-36-07.4 N CA AM WQCI945 117-20-38.8 W 0004290478 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership LAKE ELSINORE 08/19/2010 11115.00000 33-36-07.4 N CA AM WQCI945 117-20-38.8 W 0004290478 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership LAKE ELSINORE 08/19/2010 18115.00000 33-36-07.4 N NV AM WPJD342 115-51-01.3 W 0004315839 Abraham Divestiture Company LLC ELKO 08/20/2010 06152.75000 40-55-18.7 N NV AM WPJD342 115-51-01.3 W 0004315839 Abraham Divestiture Company LLC ELKO 08/20/2010 06197.24000 40-55-18.7 N NV AM WPJD342 115-51-01.3 W 0004315839 Abraham Divestiture Company LLC ELKO 08/20/2010 06226.89000 40-55-18.7 N NV AM WPJD342 115-51-01.3 W 0004315839 Abraham Divestiture Company LLC ELKO 08/20/2010 06315.84000 40-55-18.7 N NV AM WPJD342 115-51-01.3
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301228A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301228A1.txt
      • Limited Partnership BASINGER 08/26/2010 27-42-19.0 N FL AM KNKA253 081-20-31.0 W 0004277286 Orlando SMSA Limited Partnership CASSELBERRY 08/26/2010 28-39-22.0 N FL AM KNKA253 080-58-06.2 W 0004277286 Orlando SMSA Limited Partnership CHRISTMAS 08/26/2010 28-27-12.1 N FL AM KNKA253 080-58-18.3 W 0004277286 Orlando SMSA Limited Partnership CHRISTMAS 08/26/2010 28-32-17.5 N FL AM KNKA253 081-08-00.0 W 0004277286 Orlando SMSA Limited Partnership GENEVA 08/26/2010 28-45-01.3 N FL AM KNKA253 081-04-59.9 W 0004277286 Orlando SMSA Limited Partnership Kenansville 08/26/2010 27-53-51.8 N FL AM KNKA253 080-58-02.0 W 0004277286 Orlando SMSA Limited Partnership KENANSVILLE 08/26/2010 27-47-19.0 N FL AM KNKA253 080-59-51.1 W 0004277286 Orlando SMSA Limited Partnership KENANSVILLE 08/26/2010 27-55-18.9 N FL AM KNKA253 081-19-38.3 W 0004277286 Orlando SMSA Limited Partnership Kissimee 08/26/2010 28-15-11.0 N FL AM KNKA253
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301229A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301229A1.txt
      • W 0004363734 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIMiami 08/24/2010 10735.00000 25-48-18.7 N FL NE 080-21-55.8 W 0004363734 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIMiami 08/24/2010 21325.00000 25-48-18.7 N FL NE 080-07-27.5 W 0004363735 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIMiami 08/24/2010 18015.00000 25-48-24.5 N FL NE 080-07-27.5 W 0004363735 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIMiami 08/24/2010 21475.00000 25-48-24.5 N FL NE 080-12-56.1 W 0004363736 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIMIAMI 08/24/2010 11265.00000 25-51-01.3 N FL NE 080-12-56.1 W 0004363736 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIMIAMI 08/24/2010 11385.00000 25-51-01.3 N FL NE 080-12-56.1 W 0004363736 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIMIAMI 08/24/2010 17815.00000 25-51-01.3 N FL NE 080-12-56.1 W 0004363736 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIMIAMI 08/24/2010 17915.00000 25-51-01.3 N OH RM WPQX514 081-22-42.9 W 0004362726 American Electric Power Service CorporatCANTON 08/24/2010 06555.00000 40-47-49.1 N IN RM WPQX475 084-53-31.1 W
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301230A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301230A1.txt
      • CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIMIAMI 08/25/2010 19425.00000 25-49-43.0 N FL NE 080-21-50.2 W 0004363949 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIMIAMI 08/25/2010 19475.00000 25-49-43.0 N Page 16 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City FL NE 080-21-50.2 W 0004363949 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIMIAMI 08/25/2010 22425.00000 25-49-43.0 N FL NE 080-11-01.3 W 0004363950 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHollywood 08/25/2010 11305.00000 26-00-38.0 N FL NE 080-11-01.3 W 0004363950 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHollywood 08/25/2010 11425.00000 26-00-38.0 N FL NE 080-11-01.3 W 0004363950 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHollywood 08/25/2010 19325.00000 26-00-38.0 N FL NE 080-11-01.3 W 0004363950 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHollywood 08/25/2010 19525.00000 26-00-38.0 N FL NE 080-11-01.3 W 0004363950 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHollywood 08/25/2010 19625.00000
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301232A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301232A1.txt
      • Inc. Robinson 08/26/2010 05974.85000 39-00-14.4 N IL NE 087-44-23.0 W 0004367701 Cellular Properties, Inc. Robinson 08/26/2010 06004.50000 39-00-14.4 N IL NE 087-49-15.3 W 0004367703 Cellular Properties, Inc. Annapolis 08/26/2010 06093.45000 39-08-44.8 N IL NE 088-15-12.3 W 0004367704 Cellular Properties, Inc. Toledo 08/26/2010 06197.24000 39-16-54.9 N IL NE 087-35-57.9 W 0004367705 Cellular Properties, Inc. Palestine 08/26/2010 06226.89000 38-59-58.8 N IL NE 088-04-01.3 W 0004367706 Cellular Properties, Inc. West Liberty 08/26/2010 06063.80000 38-51-11.7 N RO WPQX478 0004368650 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership 08/27/2010 Page 3 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City RO WPQX705 0004368651 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership 08/27/2010 CL - Cellular
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301234A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301234A1.txt
      • 10835.00000 37-46-52.0 N VA MD WQCN388 076-51-01.0 W 0004364641 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, DEPAWEST POINT 08/25/2010 06725.00000 37-35-01.1 N VA MD WQCT232 076-44-17.1 W 0004364642 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, DEPAWarsaw 08/25/2010 06555.00000 37-58-50.5 N CA MD WJY89 118-22-34.9 W 0004366176 Los Angeles, County of Rancho Palos Verde 08/25/2010 11545.00000 33-46-10.4 N MA MD WAA734 071-23-35.2 W 0004366323 MASSACHUSETTS, COMMONWEALTH CONCORD 08/25/2010 05974.85000 42-28-01.3 N MA MD WAA734 071-23-35.2 W 0004366323 MASSACHUSETTS, COMMONWEALTH CONCORD 08/25/2010 06034.15000 42-28-01.3 N MA MD KCB89 071-53-13.3 W 0004366497 MASSACHUSETTS, COMMONWEALTH PRINCETON 08/25/2010 00942.97500 42-29-22.3 N MA MD KCB89 071-53-13.3 W 0004366497 MASSACHUSETTS, COMMONWEALTH PRINCETON 08/25/2010 00959.35000 42-29-22.3 N MA MD KCB89 071-53-13.3 W 0004366497 MASSACHUSETTS, COMMONWEALTH PRINCETON 08/25/2010 00959.70000 42-29-22.3 N MA MD KCB89 071-53-13.3 W 0004366497 MASSACHUSETTS,
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301294A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301294A1.txt
      • 100% 100% or more aDSL 4.4 10.2 10.3 26.3 20.9 13.4 7.0 3.4 2.4 0.8 0.9 sDSL 94.6 5.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Other Wireline 99.3 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cable Modem 7.8 4.4 5.1 14.6 16.7 15.9 13.7 9.5 8.4 2.3 1.6 FTTP 85.2 5.4 1.6 2.4 1.9 1.3 1.0 0.6 0.5 0.1 0.1 Satellite 45.7 50.9 2.7 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Fixed Wireless 0.0 86.8 10.7 1.3 0.8 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Power Line 99.9 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 All Other 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 1.0 0.7 1.0
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301310A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301310A1.txt
      • 3.1 2.9 2.9 3.0 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.2 3.1 Nine 2.8 2.7 2.8 2.7 2.9 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.6 Ten or More 36.9 35.0 35.3 34.0 33.5 33.1 33.6 44.7 44.0 Zero 2.2% 2.4% 2.3% 2.4% 2.4% 2.8% 2.6% 0.4% 0.5% One 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.4 2.6 2.4 0.9 1.2 Two 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.4 2.4 1.2 1.3 Three 2.2 2.3 2.2 2.4 2.3 2.5 2.4 1.3 1.4 Four 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.2 2.2 1.3 1.5 Five 2.2 2.2 2.0 2.4 2.5 2.2 2.2 1.6 1.4 Six 1.9 2.2 1.9 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.1 1.7 1.5 Seven 2.0 2.4 2.2 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.3 1.8 1.5 Eight 2.6 2.5 2.3 2.5 2.4 2.8 2.8 1.7 1.8
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301340A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301340A1.txt
      • WIRELESS PCS, LLCDecatur 08/30/2010 36-18-22.3 N AR AM KNKA479 093-59-29.5 W 0004358422 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCFAYETTEVILLE 08/30/2010 35-54-06.4 N AR AM KNKA479 093-58-26.3 W 0004358422 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCGARFIELD 08/30/2010 36-26-30.5 N AR AM KNKA479 094-28-36.7 W 0004358422 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCGravette 08/30/2010 36-25-43.1 N AR AM KNKA479 094-20-13.9 W 0004358422 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCGravette 08/30/2010 36-26-01.3 N AR AM KNKA479 094-11-14.7 W 0004358422 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCJOHNSON 08/30/2010 36-08-50.3 N Page 22 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City AR AM KNKA479 094-25-48.5 W 0004358422 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCLINCOLN 08/30/2010 35-57-46.0 N AR AM KNKA479 094-20-41.6 W 0004358422 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301341A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301341A1.txt
      • N TX AM KNKN457 097-55-56.9 W 0004333337 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Tolar 09/02/2010 32-21-43.1 N TX AM KNKN457 097-28-40.9 W 0004333337 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC VALLEY MILLS 09/02/2010 31-39-21.2 N TX AM KNKN457 099-55-49.5 W 0004333337 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Winters 09/02/2010 31-57-05.9 N FL AM KNKN555 081-47-12.3 W 0004335335 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCBONITA SPRINGS 09/02/2010 26-19-01.3 N FL AM KNKN555 081-21-52.3 W 0004335335 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCCarnestown 09/02/2010 25-54-33.4 N FL AM KNKN555 080-58-48.2 W 0004335335 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCClewiston 09/02/2010 26-25-50.3 N FL AM KNKN555 080-54-00.0 W 0004335335 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCClewiston 09/02/2010 26-42-37.8 N FL AM KNKN555 080-58-51.7 W 0004335335 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCCLEWISTON 09/02/2010 26-25-52.6 N FL AM KNKN555
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301456A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301456A1.txt
      • HOLDINGS IIIYork 09/08/2010 17915.00000 39-57-46.2 N PA MD WQLJ470 076-43-33.3 W 0004379589 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIYork 09/08/2010 21975.00000 39-57-46.2 N PA MD WQLJ470 076-43-33.3 W 0004379589 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIYork 09/08/2010 22075.00000 39-57-46.2 N PA MD WQLJ470 076-43-33.3 W 0004379589 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIYork 09/08/2010 22475.00000 39-57-46.2 N PA MD WQLJ284 076-58-07.0 W 0004379590 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHampden 09/08/2010 19375.00000 40-14-01.3 N PA MD WQLJ284 076-58-07.0 W 0004379590 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHampden 09/08/2010 19425.00000 40-14-01.3 N PA MD WQLJ284 076-58-07.0 W 0004379590 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHampden 09/08/2010 19475.00000 40-14-01.3 N PA MD WQLJ284 076-58-07.0 W 0004379590 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHampden 09/08/2010 19575.00000 40-14-01.3 N PA MD WQLJ284 076-58-07.0 W 0004379590 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHampden 09/08/2010 19675.00000 40-14-01.3 N PA MD WQLJ284
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301457A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301457A1.txt
      • 32-42-56.0 N CA NE 117-04-02.0 W 0004379766 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISAN DIEGO 09/08/2010 17865.00000 32-42-03.8 N CA NE 117-04-48.4 W 0004379767 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISan Diego 09/08/2010 23225.00000 32-59-37.7 N CA NE 117-01-16.6 W 0004379768 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIChula Vista 09/08/2010 21875.00000 32-36-57.2 N CA NE 117-01-16.6 W 0004379768 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIChula Vista 09/08/2010 22025.00000 32-36-57.2 N CA NE 117-03-01.3 W 0004379769 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIChula Vista 09/08/2010 19575.00000 32-36-24.6 N CA NE 117-03-01.3 W 0004379769 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIChula Vista 09/08/2010 19675.00000 32-36-24.6 N CA NE 117-06-54.4 W 0004379771 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIImperial Beach 09/08/2010 11265.00000 32-35-07.2 N CA NE 117-06-54.4 W 0004379771 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIImperial Beach 09/08/2010 11425.00000 32-35-07.2 N CA NE 117-11-40.2 W 0004379776 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301481A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301481A1.txt
      • SES-MOD-20100727-00963 E Class of Station: Mobile Earth Station Application for Modification TerreStar Networks Inc. Nature of Service: Mobile Satellite Service WAIVER REQUEST OF TERRESTAR NETWORKS INC. Section 25.252 of the Commission's rules establishes technical standards for operation of ancillary terrestrial component (ATC) facilities on frequencies in the 2000-2020 and 2180-2200 MHz bands (collectively, the "2 GHz band"). Pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules. These waivers will enable TerreStar to enhance network efficiency and to align its operations more closely with the needs of its customers. The waivers closely track waivers granted to the only other 2 GHz band MSS/ATC licensee. SITE ID: METs 2,000,000 portable handset METs CONUS, HI, PR, US VI, AK LOCATION: Various P1 0.03 meters ANTENNA
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301505A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301505A1.txt
      • - Selected Data of Holding Companies of Reporting Carriers as of December 31, 2007 - 2008. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Table 1.2 - Intercorporate Relations of Wireline Affiliates of Subject Local Exchange Carriers, as of December 31, 2007. . . . . . . Table 1.3 - Toll Service Revenues by Provider. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301620A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301620A1.txt
      • W 0004390969 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF MECCA 09/16/2010 06545.00000 33-39-32.1 N Page 4 MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA MD KCI37 115-59-09.9 W 0004390969 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF MECCA 09/16/2010 06865.00000 33-39-32.1 N IL MD WQFQ768 088-12-15.5 W 0004391974 PLAINFIELD COMMUNITY CONSOLIDATPLAINFIELD 09/17/2010 17755.00000 41-36-01.3 N IL MD WQFQ768 088-12-15.5 W 0004391974 PLAINFIELD COMMUNITY CONSOLIDATPLAINFIELD 09/17/2010 17765.00000 41-36-01.3 N IL MD WQFQ768 088-12-15.5 W 0004391974 PLAINFIELD COMMUNITY CONSOLIDATPLAINFIELD 09/17/2010 17820.00000 41-36-01.3 N IL MD WQFQ768 088-12-15.5 W 0004391974 PLAINFIELD COMMUNITY CONSOLIDATPLAINFIELD 09/17/2010 17875.00000 41-36-01.3 N IL MD WQFQ768 088-12-15.5 W 0004391974 PLAINFIELD COMMUNITY CONSOLIDATPLAINFIELD 09/17/2010 18060.00000 41-36-01.3 N OK MD WNEH485 095-06-43.9 W 0004392317 GRAND
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301621A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301621A1.txt
      • N MS MD KNKQ309 089-36-52.9 W 0004387789 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCKosciusko 09/14/2010 33-02-46.0 N MS MD KNKQ309 089-24-14.6 W 0004387789 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCMcCool 09/14/2010 33-11-10.9 N MS MD KNKQ309 089-58-00.3 W 0004387789 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCRICHLAND 09/14/2010 32-58-40.5 N MS MD KNKQ309 089-46-07.6 W 0004387789 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCSALLIS 09/14/2010 33-01-38.7 N MS MD KNKQ309 089-40-01.3 W 0004387789 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCWEST 09/14/2010 33-10-02.8 N MS MD KNKQ309 089-44-50.6 W 0004387789 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCWinona 09/14/2010 33-29-48.3 N TX MD KNKA372 097-53-08.0 W 0004388552 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Andice 09/14/2010 30-47-36.8 N TX MD KNKA372 097-46-10.0 W 0004388552 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Austin 09/14/2010 30-11-00.8 N TX MD KNKA372 097-57-32.0 W 0004388552
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301622A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301622A1.txt
      • 35-51-23.0 N OK AM KNKN596 096-14-54.2 W 0004320584 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Calvin 09/17/2010 34-48-21.7 N OK AM KNKN596 096-23-05.0 W 0004320584 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC CASTLE 09/17/2010 35-27-03.0 N OK AM KNKN596 096-11-20.0 W 0004320584 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC CLEARVIEW 09/17/2010 35-26-11.0 N OK AM KNKN596 095-41-34.0 W 0004320584 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Crowder 09/17/2010 35-07-01.3 N OK AM KNKN596 095-33-42.0 W 0004320584 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC EUFAULA 09/17/2010 35-15-15.0 N OK AM KNKN596 095-14-35.5 W 0004320584 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Ft. Gibson 09/17/2010 35-48-32.4 N OK AM KNKN596 095-34-45.9 W 0004320584 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC HAILEYVILLE 09/17/2010 34-50-44.4 N OK AM KNKN596 095-55-28.0 W 0004320584 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC HANNA 09/17/2010
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301624A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301624A1.txt
      • 19575.00000 42-54-55.7 N MI MD WQIR341 085-40-21.2 W 0004391963 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II GRAND RAPIDS 09/17/2010 19675.00000 42-54-55.7 N OR MD KKW94 123-06-36.3 W 0004392528 NORTHWEST NATURAL GAS COMPANYSALEM 09/17/2010 06755.00000 44-50-47.4 N Page 12 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City AK MD WPQP532 146-50-01.3 W 0004392561 Alyeska Pipeline Service Company, AgentPRINCE WILLIAM S 09/17/2010 06595.62500 60-50-46.1 N VA MD WQLH464 077-07-04.7 W 0004392744 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIArlington 09/17/2010 19525.00000 38-53-00.7 N VA MD WQLH464 077-07-04.7 W 0004392744 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIArlington 09/17/2010 19625.00000 38-53-00.7 N VA MD WQLH464 077-07-04.7 W 0004392744 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIArlington 09/17/2010 21275.00000 38-53-00.7 N VA MD WQLH464 077-07-04.7 W
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301765A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301765A1.txt
      • Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OK MD WHY405 097-04-28.6 W 0004400068 MUR-THOM BROADCASTING, INC. PONCA CITY 09/24/2010 00949.00000 36-45-10.1 N CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NV AM WPJD342 115-51-01.3 W 0004315839 Abraham Divestiture Company LLC ELKO 09/24/2010 06152.75000 40-55-18.7 N NV AM WPJD342 115-51-01.3 W 0004315839 Abraham Divestiture Company LLC ELKO 09/24/2010 06197.24000 40-55-18.7 N NV AM WPJD342 115-51-01.3 W 0004315839 Abraham Divestiture Company LLC ELKO 09/24/2010 06226.89000 40-55-18.7 N NV AM WPJD342 115-51-01.3 W 0004315839 Abraham Divestiture Company LLC ELKO 09/24/2010 06286.19000 40-55-18.7 N NV AM WPJD342 115-51-01.3
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301766A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301766A1.txt
      • CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICleveland 09/22/2010 23125.00000 41-31-03.2 N OH NE 081-39-14.0 W 0004396788 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICleveland 09/22/2010 23225.00000 41-31-03.2 N OH NE 081-39-14.0 W 0004396788 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICleveland 09/22/2010 23275.00000 41-31-03.2 N OH NE 081-47-06.7 W 0004396789 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIMiddleburg Heights 09/22/2010 22025.00000 41-21-09.0 N OH NE 081-31-15.3 W 0004396790 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIUniversity Heights 09/22/2010 23025.00000 41-30-01.3 N OH NE 081-32-55.9 W 0004396791 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICleveland Heights 09/22/2010 23275.00000 41-31-51.6 N OH NE 081-32-16.0 W 0004396793 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICLEVELAND HEIGH 09/22/2010 11505.00000 41-31-25.7 N OH NE 081-32-16.0 W 0004396793 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICLEVELAND HEIGH 09/22/2010 11585.00000 41-31-25.7 N OH NE 081-32-16.0 W 0004396793 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICLEVELAND HEIGH 09/22/2010 21825.00000 41-31-25.7 N OH NE 081-32-16.0
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301767A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301767A1.txt
      • HOLDINGS IIIAvon 09/23/2010 19375.00000 41-28-32.2 N OH NE 081-59-23.5 W 0004397589 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIAvon 09/23/2010 19475.00000 41-28-32.2 N OH NE 081-59-23.5 W 0004397589 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIAvon 09/23/2010 19525.00000 41-28-32.2 N OH NE 081-59-23.5 W 0004397589 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIAvon 09/23/2010 19625.00000 41-28-32.2 N OH NE 081-25-03.5 W 0004397590 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIWilloughby 09/23/2010 21875.00000 41-38-49.5 N OH NE 081-35-01.3 W 0004397591 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICleveland 09/23/2010 23025.00000 41-33-39.8 N OH NE 081-44-11.4 W 0004397592 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIParma 09/23/2010 23075.00000 41-24-41.8 N OH NE 081-41-42.6 W 0004397593 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICleveland 09/23/2010 23025.00000 41-30-02.8 N OH NE 081-47-20.0 W 0004397594 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICLEVELAND 09/23/2010 21825.00000 41-27-33.8 N OH NE 081-47-20.0 W 0004397594 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICLEVELAND 09/23/2010 21975.00000
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301769A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301769A1.txt
      • CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIColumbus 09/24/2010 23275.00000 39-57-13.9 N Page 16 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OH NE 082-59-03.9 W 0004399911 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIColumbus 09/24/2010 23425.00000 39-57-13.9 N OH NE 082-59-03.9 W 0004399911 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIColumbus 09/24/2010 23575.00000 39-57-13.9 N OH NE 083-02-01.3 W 0004399912 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIColumbus 09/24/2010 10735.00000 39-56-56.3 N OH NE 083-02-01.3 W 0004399912 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIColumbus 09/24/2010 10775.00000 39-56-56.3 N OH NE 083-02-01.3 W 0004399912 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIColumbus 09/24/2010 10855.00000 39-56-56.3 N OH NE 083-02-01.3 W 0004399912 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIColumbus 09/24/2010 10895.00000 39-56-56.3 N OH NE 083-02-01.3 W 0004399912 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIColumbus 09/24/2010 10975.00000
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.txt
      • purchased by calling Best Copy and Printing, Inc., Portals II, 445 12th Street S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington DC 20554 at 800-378-3160, facsimile 202-488-5563, or via e-mail fcc@bcpiweb.com. The report can also be downloaded from the Wireline Competition Bureau Statistical Reports Internet site at: www.fcc.gov/wcb/iatd/trends.html. Table of Contents 1-1 1-1 Table 1.1Interstate Per-Line Access Charges...............................................................1-3 Table 1.2Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges............................................................1-4 Table 1.3Interstate Per-Line Access Charges by Carrier...................................................1-5 Table 1.4Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges by Carrier................................................1-7 2-1 Table 2.1High-Speed Connections...........................................................................2-3 Chart 2.1Fixed High-Speed Connections.....................................................................2-3 Chart 2.2High-Speed Connections by Technology.........................................................2-3 Table 2.2Residential High-Speed Connections............................................................2-4 Chart 2.3Residential Fixed High-Speed Connections......................................................2-4 Chart 2.4Residential High-Speed Connections by Technology..........................................2-4 Table 2.3Total High-Speed Connections by Speed Tier...................................................2-5 Table 2.4Residential High-Speed Connections by Speed Tier.......................................... 2-6 Table 2.5High-Speed Connections by Technology
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301909A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301909A1.txt
      • IIICincinnati 09/27/2010 17815.00000 39-18-36.9 N OH NE 084-22-56.5 W 0004401989 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIICincinnati 09/27/2010 17915.00000 39-18-36.9 N OH NE 084-26-05.1 W 0004401990 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIWest Chester 09/27/2010 19425.00000 39-20-59.3 N OH NE 084-26-26.6 W 0004401991 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHamilton 09/27/2010 19325.00000 39-22-52.5 N OH NE 084-29-50.6 W 0004401992 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIFairfield 09/27/2010 23225.00000 39-19-05.2 N OH NE 084-32-01.3 W 0004401993 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHAMILTON 09/27/2010 11305.00000 39-23-03.9 N OH NE 084-32-01.3 W 0004401993 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHAMILTON 09/27/2010 11385.00000 39-23-03.9 N OH NE 084-32-01.3 W 0004401993 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHAMILTON 09/27/2010 21925.00000 39-23-03.9 N OH NE 084-32-01.3 W 0004401993 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHAMILTON 09/27/2010 22075.00000 39-23-03.9 N Page 34 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302101A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302101A1.txt
      • 0004409782 FiberTower Network Services Corp. TOLEDO 10/04/2010 11345.00000 41-39-40.0 N OH MD WQFF883 083-32-14.0 W 0004409782 FiberTower Network Services Corp. TOLEDO 10/04/2010 18060.00000 41-39-40.0 N TX MD WMS249 097-12-25.8 W 0004409803 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC GRANDVIEW 10/04/2010 06315.84000 32-20-02.0 N TX MD WMQ740 097-01-45.9 W 0004409860 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC MIDLOTHIAN 10/04/2010 06063.80000 32-24-41.9 N OR MD KYS71 123-02-01.3 W 0004409963 Qwest Corporation SALEM 10/04/2010 02174.80000 44-56-17.4 N OR MD KYS71 123-02-01.3 W 0004409963 Qwest Corporation SALEM 10/04/2010 06775.00000 44-56-17.4 N OR MD WCU565 123-34-28.3 W 0004409964 Qwest Corporation BLACK ROCK 10/04/2010 02124.80000 44-55-23.4 N OR MD WCU565 123-34-28.3 W 0004409964 Qwest Corporation BLACK ROCK 10/04/2010 06615.00000 44-55-23.4 N WA MD KOJ95 118-03-20.8 W 0004409965 Qwest Corporation BENGE 10/04/2010
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302103A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302103A1.txt
      • 093-09-00.4 W 0004413267 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. St. Paul 10/06/2010 22010.00000 44-57-10.4 N MN MD WQJR640 093-09-00.4 W 0004413267 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. St. Paul 10/06/2010 22180.00000 44-57-10.4 N Page 5 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MN MD WQKG659 093-08-01.3 W 0004413269 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. St. Paul 10/06/2010 23380.00000 44-56-24.0 N MN MD WQKU353 093-07-00.3 W 0004413272 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. St. Paul 10/06/2010 23210.00000 44-56-46.9 N MN MD WQKD845 093-06-46.2 W 0004413274 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. St. Paul 10/06/2010 23410.00000 44-57-50.8 N MN MD WQKD845 093-06-46.2 W 0004413274 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. St. Paul 10/06/2010 23425.00000 44-57-50.8 N
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302270A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302270A1.txt
      • N PA MD WLW516 076-18-17.2 W 0004417408 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCMIFFLINVILLE 10/12/2010 05974.85000 40-59-14.6 N PA MD WLW516 076-18-17.2 W 0004417408 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCMIFFLINVILLE 10/12/2010 06004.50000 40-59-14.6 N CO MD WQJI726 102-15-46.7 W 0004417409 NE Colorado Cellular, Inc. (Bonny) Burlington 10/12/2010 06197.24000 39-30-58.3 N KS MD WQJR214 102-01-18.4 W 0004417410 NE Colorado Cellular, Inc. Kanorado 10/12/2010 05945.20000 39-20-01.3 N KS MD WQMM241 100-51-48.0 W 0004417412 NE Colorado Cellular, Inc. Oakley 10/12/2010 05945.20000 39-08-04.3 N WY MD WMR890 109-55-31.6 W 0004417837 UNION TELEPHONE COMPANY PINDALE 10/12/2010 11345.00000 42-50-38.8 N WY MD WPOQ674 109-40-05.5 W 0004417842 Union Telephone Company BOULDER 10/12/2010 11325.00000 42-33-51.8 N CA MD WPOS306 121-06-37.9 W 0004417859 Cal-Ore Telephone Co. CANBY 10/12/2010 05945.20000 41-25-02.5 N CA MD
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302271A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302271A1.txt
      • 10/13/2010 23125.00000 37-46-59.6 N CA MD WQMM213 122-12-11.5 W 0004418263 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIOakland 10/13/2010 23275.00000 37-46-59.6 N CA MD WQML883 122-24-06.0 W 0004418265 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISan Francisco 10/13/2010 23325.00000 37-47-38.7 N CA MD WQML883 122-24-06.0 W 0004418265 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISan Francisco 10/13/2010 23425.00000 37-47-38.7 N NY MD WQII659 078-52-32.6 W 0004418266 Transwave Communication Systems, Inc.Buffalo 10/13/2010 06093.45000 42-53-01.3 N NY MD WQII659 078-52-32.6 W 0004418266 Transwave Communication Systems, Inc.Buffalo 10/13/2010 11345.00000 42-53-01.3 N NY MD WQII659 078-52-32.6 W 0004418266 Transwave Communication Systems, Inc.Buffalo 10/13/2010 17840.00000 42-53-01.3 N CA MD WQML583 122-27-12.3 W 0004418355 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISan Francisco 10/13/2010 21925.00000 37-45-59.4 N CA MD WQML583 122-27-12.3 W 0004418355 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISan Francisco 10/13/2010 22075.00000 37-45-59.4 N CA
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302397A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302397A1.txt
      • (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City UT NE 112-21-44.8 W 0004428056 Fillmore, City of Fillmore 10/20/2010 00122.80000 38-57-29.9 N CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City PR AM 066-02-16.9 W 0004279556 T-MOBILE PUERTO RICO LLC Bairoa 10/19/2010 19400.00000 18-15-29.4 N PR AM 066-08-01.3 W 0004286167 T-MOBILE PUERTO RICO LLC Bayamon 10/19/2010 11265.00000 18-23-50.6 N PR AM 066-08-01.3 W 0004286167 T-MOBILE PUERTO RICO LLC Bayamon 10/19/2010 11465.00000 18-23-50.6 N PR AM 066-08-01.3 W 0004286167 T-MOBILE PUERTO RICO LLC Bayamon 10/19/2010 17960.00000 18-23-50.6 N PR AM 066-08-01.3 W 0004286167 T-MOBILE PUERTO RICO LLC Bayamon 10/19/2010 18000.00000 18-23-50.6 N Page 1 CF - Common Carrier Fixed
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302402A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302402A1.txt
      • 00942.37500 45-38-15.2 N MI MD WQCS870 084-48-07.1 W 0004428330 CCE Central Dispatch Authority LEVERING 10/21/2010 00943.17500 45-38-15.2 N MI MD WQCS870 084-48-07.1 W 0004428330 CCE Central Dispatch Authority LEVERING 10/21/2010 11245.00000 45-38-15.2 N MI MD WQCS870 084-48-07.1 W 0004428330 CCE Central Dispatch Authority LEVERING 10/21/2010 11285.00000 45-38-15.2 N MI MD WQIA446 084-36-04.6 W 0004428436 CCE Central Dispatch WOLVERINE 10/21/2010 00933.77500 45-21-01.3 N MI MD WQIA446 084-36-04.6 W 0004428436 CCE Central Dispatch WOLVERINE 10/21/2010 00957.95000 45-21-01.3 N MI MD WQIA446 084-36-04.6 W 0004428436 CCE Central Dispatch WOLVERINE 10/21/2010 10755.00000 45-21-01.3 N MI MD WQIA446 084-36-04.6 W 0004428436 CCE Central Dispatch WOLVERINE 10/21/2010 10795.00000 45-21-01.3 N MI MD WPJF369 084-52-43.0 W 0004428437 CCE CENTRAL DISPATCH AUTHORITYPETOSKEY 10/21/2010 00933.17500 45-19-34.0 N Page 10 MW
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302816A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302816A1.txt
      • 11/10/2010 23260.00000 36-53-13.1 N VA NE 076-02-52.6 W 0004449540 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Virginia Beach 11/10/2010 22480.00000 36-51-02.4 N VA NE 076-07-19.9 W 0004449541 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Virginia Beach 11/10/2010 22510.00000 36-51-45.7 N VA NE 076-23-57.1 W 0004449631 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Chesapeake 11/10/2010 22180.00000 36-47-45.6 N VA NE 077-32-24.4 W 0004449640 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Richmond 11/10/2010 21510.00000 37-38-01.3 N VA NE 077-34-35.4 W 0004449654 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Richmond 11/10/2010 22560.00000 37-34-20.6 N OK RM WMS371 095-37-14.9 W 0004445411 UNITED STATES CELLULAR TELEPHONMC ALESTER 11/08/2010 05945.20000 34-57-41.3 N OK RM WMS371 095-37-14.9 W 0004445411 UNITED STATES CELLULAR TELEPHONMC ALESTER 11/08/2010 05974.85000 34-57-41.3 N OK RM WMS371 095-37-14.9 W 0004445411 UNITED STATES CELLULAR TELEPHONMC ALESTER 11/08/2010 06034.15000 34-57-41.3 N
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302817A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302817A1.txt
      • MD WQLY383 092-42-54.6 W 0004450144 South Arkansas Telephone Company East Camden 11/12/2010 06315.84000 33-38-03.3 N AR MD WQLY381 092-28-08.0 W 0004450145 South Arkansas Telephone Company HAMPTON 11/12/2010 06063.80000 33-32-11.0 N CA MD WQAK989 118-12-19.2 W 0004450177 THUMS LONG BEACH COMPANY LONG BEACH 11/12/2010 17900.00000 33-46-04.8 N CA MD WQJR606 118-12-24.1 W 0004450180 THUMS LONG BEACH COMPANY LONG BEACH 11/12/2010 19370.00000 33-46-01.3 N CA MD WQMI723 118-11-31.5 W 0004450186 THUMS Long Beach Company LONG BEACH 11/12/2010 19425.00000 33-44-59.5 N CA MD WQMI723 118-11-31.5 W 0004450186 THUMS Long Beach Company LONG BEACH 11/12/2010 19525.00000 33-44-59.5 N CA MD WQMI916 118-10-57.9 W 0004450189 THUMS Long Beach Company Long Beach 11/12/2010 19475.00000 33-45-33.2 N Page 40 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302818A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302818A1.txt
      • 11/12/2010 10715.00000 32-48-41.4 N AZ NE 113-57-18.0 W 0004451147 Gila Electronics of Yuma, Inc. TACNA 11/12/2010 11175.00000 32-41-41.4 N OR NE 124-30-12.4 W 0004451631 Cellco Partnership Port Orford 11/12/2010 10795.00000 42-44-40.4 N OR NE 124-26-58.6 W 0004451641 Cellco Partnership Langolis 11/12/2010 11285.00000 42-51-52.2 N VA NE 076-20-16.0 W 0004451821 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. CHESAPEAKE 11/12/2010 22430.00000 36-46-18.0 N VA NE 077-35-01.3 W 0004451832 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Richmond 11/12/2010 22030.00000 37-38-28.7 N CA RM WMR504 122-35-01.0 W 0004451483 CALIFORNIA RURAL SERVICE AREA #1YREKA 11/12/2010 06746.25000 41-47-39.0 N CA RM WMR504 122-35-01.0 W 0004451483 CALIFORNIA RURAL SERVICE AREA #1YREKA 11/12/2010 06783.75000 41-47-39.0 N CA RM WMR504 122-35-01.0 W 0004451483 CALIFORNIA RURAL SERVICE AREA #1YREKA 11/12/2010 06815.00000 41-47-39.0 N CA RM WMR504 122-35-01.0
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303393A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303393A1.txt
      • WQIR891 084-23-28.1 W 0004519182 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II, LLC ATLANTA 12/02/2010 23025.00000 33-47-56.1 N GA MD WQIR891 084-23-28.1 W 0004519182 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II, LLC ATLANTA 12/02/2010 23125.00000 33-47-56.1 N GA MD WQIR891 084-23-28.1 W 0004519182 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II, LLC ATLANTA 12/02/2010 23175.00000 33-47-56.1 N GA MD WQIS299 084-12-05.9 W 0004519185 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II, LLC NORCROSS 12/02/2010 11265.00000 33-55-01.3 N GA MD WQIS299 084-12-05.9 W 0004519185 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II, LLC NORCROSS 12/02/2010 11345.00000 33-55-01.3 N GA MD WQIS299 084-12-05.9 W 0004519185 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II, LLC NORCROSS 12/02/2010 23025.00000 33-55-01.3 N GA MD WQIS299 084-12-05.9 W 0004519185 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II, LLC NORCROSS 12/02/2010 23075.00000 33-55-01.3 N GA MD WQIS299 084-12-05.9 W 0004519185 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II, LLC
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303405A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303405A1.txt
      • than 100% 100% or more aDSL 1.1 2.3 6.1 28.9 31.0 19.8 7.0 2.3 0.7 0.3 0.3 sDSL 79.2 19.3 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Other Wireline 92.6 7.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cable Modem 12.7 12.2 11.5 20.0 18.3 12.7 8.0 3.5 1.0 0.1 0.0 FTTP 67.6 24.8 2.8 2.4 1.3 0.7 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Satellite 0.9 89.0 8.7 1.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Fixed Wireless 51.4 39.6 5.4 2.6 0.7 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Power Line 99.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 All Other 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 0.1 0.5
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303633A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303633A1.txt
      • 43-02-32.6 N NY MD KNKN865 077-56-45.6 W 0004526861 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Bergen 12/08/2010 43-04-44.3 N NY MD KNKN865 078-11-11.0 W 0004526861 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Bolivar 12/08/2010 42-04-18.0 N NY MD KNKN865 077-09-27.1 W 0004526861 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Campbell 12/08/2010 42-14-02.6 N NY MD KNKN865 078-03-45.9 W 0004526861 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Castile 12/08/2010 42-42-01.3 N NY MD KNKN865 079-06-47.2 W 0004526861 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Cherry Creek 12/08/2010 42-14-50.2 N NY MD KNKN865 079-37-12.8 W 0004526861 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Clymer 12/08/2010 42-01-59.2 N NY MD KNKN865 079-44-49.0 W 0004526861 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Clymer 12/08/2010 42-03-20.2 N NY MD KNKN865 077-29-48.9 W 0004526861 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC COHOCTON 12/08/2010
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303823A1.txt
      • 12/21/2010 00469.72500 SC MD WNAK916 X 0004540794 STEWART JR, JAMES M 12/21/2010 00466.12500 SC MD WNAK916 X 0004540794 STEWART JR, JAMES M 12/21/2010 00466.50000 SC MD WNAK916 X 0004540794 STEWART JR, JAMES M 12/21/2010 00466.85000 SC MD WNAK916 X 0004540794 STEWART JR, JAMES M 12/21/2010 00469.60000 SC MD WNAK916 X 0004540794 STEWART JR, JAMES M 12/21/2010 00469.72500 SC MD WNAK916 081-00-01.3 W 0004540794 STEWART JR, JAMES M ROCK HILL 12/21/2010 00461.12500 34-54-43.5 N Page 25 IK - Industrial/Business Pool - Commercial, Conventional State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City SC MD WNAK916 081-00-01.3 W 0004540794 STEWART JR, JAMES M ROCK HILL 12/21/2010 00461.85000 34-54-43.5 N SC MD WNAK916 081-00-01.3 W 0004540794
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303824A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303824A1.txt
      • N FL MD WQMQ828 080-07-16.5 W 0004544334 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIMiami Beach 12/22/2010 11425.00000 25-52-19.8 N FL MD WQMQ828 080-07-16.5 W 0004544334 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIMiami Beach 12/22/2010 17965.00000 25-52-19.8 N FL MD WQMQ828 080-07-16.5 W 0004544334 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIMiami Beach 12/22/2010 18065.00000 25-52-19.8 N FL MD WQMQ810 080-12-56.1 W 0004544335 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIWest Little River 12/22/2010 11265.00000 25-51-01.3 N FL MD WQMQ810 080-12-56.1 W 0004544335 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIWest Little River 12/22/2010 11305.00000 25-51-01.3 N Page 9 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City FL MD WQMQ810 080-12-56.1 W 0004544335 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIWest Little River 12/22/2010 11385.00000 25-51-01.3 N FL MD WQMQ810
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303846A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303846A1.txt
      • Path ## Ant. IG - Industrial/Business Pool, Conventional Mobility Division 11/23/2010 WPDC893 FB2 Allied Tube & Conduit 463.56250000 HARVEY 41-36-0.1 N IL 87-38-32.2 W 1 2 11/23/2010 WPDC893 MO Allied Tube & Conduit 463.56250000 -- -- 2 1 11/23/2010 WPDC893 MO Allied Tube & Conduit 468.56250000 -- -- 2 1 11/25/2010 WQEE747 FB2 OASIS/GREENCORP, LLC 463.78750000 Mesquite 36-49-22.3 N NV 114-4-1.3 W 2 1 11/25/2010 WQEE747 MO OASIS/GREENCORP, LLC 468.78750000 -- -- 3 1 Call Sign Termination Date Stn Class Licensee Name Lower/Upper Frequency City Latitude State Longitude Loc./ Path ## Ant. MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool Broadband Division 11/20/2010 WQKH519 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 21825.00000000 LAS VEGAS 36-5-52.2 N NV 115-2-55.9 W 2 1 11/20/2010 WQKH522 FXO CLEARWIRE
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
      • Chart ................................ Chart 4.1 State Code Reference ............................................................................................... Table 8.4 Subscribership - Household - United States ........................................................... Table 6.1 Switch Downtime and Trunk Blocking - 2009 ......................................................... Table 9.2 Switch Downtime Causes - 2009 ............................................................................ Table 9.3 Telecommunications Industry Revenues - Total ...................................................Table 1.1 Telecommunications Industry Revenues by Service ............................................. Table 1.2 Telecommunications Revenues - by Type of Carrier ............................................Table 1.3 Telecommunications Revenues - End User - by Provider - 2008..................... . Table 1.14 Telecommunications Revenues - End User - by State ........................................... Table 1.13 Telecommunications Revenues - Interstate and International - by Provider - 2008 Table 1.16 Telecommunications Revenues - Intrastate - by Provider - 2008 ....................... Table 1.15 Universal Service Program Requirements and Contribution Factors - 2010 ............Table 1.10
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A11.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A11.txt
      • 6.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.1 13.3 152.7 117.0 73.8 Events per Million Access Lines 0.39 0.00 0.00 12.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 77.31 2.49 694.35 688.01 288.48 Average Outage Duration in Minutes 64.5 NA NA 759.4 NA NA NA 275.1 501.5 305.4 217.5 173.7 Average Lines Affected per Event in Thousands 50.8 NA NA 4.0 NA NA NA 0.4 32.6 1.4 1.3 1.8 Outage Line-Minutes per Event in Thousands 1740.3 NA NA 2392.6 NA NA NA 94.2 16312.7 300.4 354.6 268.5 Outage Line-Minutes per 1,000 Access Lines 679.7 0.0 0.030,852.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 7,281.440,583.4 208,552.4243,953.177,463.9 For Scheduled Downtime More Than 2 Minutes Number of Occurrences or Events 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 16 19 Events per Hundred
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A2.txt
      • Chart ................................ Chart 4.1 State Code Reference ............................................................................................... Table 8.4 Subscribership - Household - United States ........................................................... Table 6.1 Switch Downtime and Trunk Blocking - 2009 ......................................................... Table 9.2 Switch Downtime Causes - 2009 ............................................................................ Table 9.3 Telecommunications Industry Revenues - Total ...................................................Table 1.1 Telecommunications Industry Revenues by Service ............................................. Table 1.2 Telecommunications Revenues - by Type of Carrier ............................................Table 1.3 Telecommunications Revenues - End User - by Provider - 2008..................... . Table 1.14 Telecommunications Revenues - End User - by State ........................................... Table 1.13 Telecommunications Revenues - Interstate and International - by Provider - 2008 Table 1.16 Telecommunications Revenues - Intrastate - by Provider - 2008 ....................... Table 1.15 Universal Service Program Requirements and Contribution Factors - 2010 ............Table 1.10
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A3.txt
      • information or as a result of audits. Nonetheless, disaggregated data are likely to be less accurate than industry totals. Table 1.1 shows the major components of telecommunications revenues for 1999 through 2009. This table was created by aggregating revenue by major service classifications, i.e. local, mobile wireless, and toll, and separately by intrastate and interstate and international. Tables 1.2 and 1.3 provide a look at annual industry revenues over time. Generally, Form 499-A revenue data can be aggregated in two distinct ways: by type of service and by principal communications business. Table 1.2 categorizes revenues by type of service and shows, for example, that providers reported $124.5 billion in wireless service revenues for 2008. This total includes wireless service revenues from
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A9.txt
      • 0 50 100 150 200 250 1956 1960 1964 1968 1972 1976 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 2008 CPI All Items CPI Telephone Services 7 - 5 1980 9.7 12.5 4.6 1981 8.3 8.9 11.7 1982 5.2 3.8 7.2 1983 3.4 3.8 3.6 1984 3.6 3.9 9.2 1985 2.8 3.8 4.7 1986 2.3 1.1 2.7 1987 2.9 4.4 -1.3 1988 3.7 4.4 1.3 1989 3.5 4.6 -0.3 1990 4.1 6.1 -0.4 1991 3.1 3.1 3.5 1992 2.1 2.9 -0.3 1993 2.3 2.7 1.8 1994 2.2 2.7 0.7 1995 2.0 2.5 1.2 1996 1.9 3.3 2.1 1997 1.5 1.7 0.2 1998 1.1 1.6 0.3* 1999 1.5 2.7 0.4 2000 2.3 3.4 -2.3 2001 2.5 1.6 1.3 2002 1.7 2.4 0.2
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303900A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303900A1.txt
      • the numbering resources are treated as CLEC resources. 15 Table 4 Telephone Number Utilization by State as of December 31, 2009 Assigned Intermediate Reserved Aging Administrative Available1 Total State/jurisdiction 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s Alabama 9,704 42.6 754 3.3 176 0.8 589 2.6 532 2.3 11,003 48.3 22,758 Alaska 1,545 27.0 73 1.3 146 2.6 69 1.2 24 0.4 3,873 67.6 5,730 American Samoa 27 66.4 0 0.0 1 1.4 0 0.0 1 2.0 12 30.1 40 Arizona 13,542 62.7 68 0.3 207 1.0 757 3.5 281 1.3 6,742 31.2 21,598 Arkansas 5,163 35.8 409 2.8 41 0.3 221 1.5 216 1.5 8,385 58.1 14,435 California 80,655 52.1 2,126 1.4 709 0.5 4,333
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304030A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304030A1.txt
      • 118-21-42.5 W 0004560856 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILos Angeles 01/05/2011 22125.00000 34-04-23.5 N CA MD WQLP382 118-21-42.5 W 0004560856 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILos Angeles 01/05/2011 22175.00000 34-04-23.5 N CA MD WQLP382 118-21-42.5 W 0004560856 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILos Angeles 01/05/2011 22225.00000 34-04-23.5 N CA MD WQLP382 118-21-42.5 W 0004560856 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILos Angeles 01/05/2011 22275.00000 34-04-23.5 N CA MD WQMH272 117-46-01.3 W 0004560859 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIPomona 01/05/2011 21925.00000 34-04-05.2 N CA MD WQMH272 117-46-01.3 W 0004560859 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIPomona 01/05/2011 22075.00000 34-04-05.2 N CA MD WQMH396 118-23-38.7 W 0004560860 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIManhattan Beach 01/05/2011 10775.00000 33-53-22.0 N CA MD WQMH396 118-23-38.7 W 0004560860 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIManhattan Beach 01/05/2011 23125.00000 33-53-22.0 N CA MD WQMH809 118-13-16.8 W 0004560861
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304031A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304031A1.txt
      • 21925.00000 33-55-14.0 N CA MD WQMB850 118-15-58.2 W 0004561536 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIWest Compton 01/06/2011 22125.00000 33-53-12.0 N Page 12 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA MD WQMB850 118-15-58.2 W 0004561536 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIWest Compton 01/06/2011 23025.00000 33-53-12.0 N CA MD WQMC257 118-17-01.3 W 0004561537 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILos Angeles 01/06/2011 23125.00000 34-03-10.4 N CA MD WQMC257 118-17-01.3 W 0004561537 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILos Angeles 01/06/2011 23175.00000 34-03-10.4 N CA MD WQMC257 118-17-01.3 W 0004561537 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILos Angeles 01/06/2011 23225.00000 34-03-10.4 N CA MD WQMC257 118-17-01.3 W 0004561537 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILos Angeles 01/06/2011 23275.00000 34-03-10.4 N CA MD WQMC257 118-17-01.3
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304032A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304032A1.txt
      • PCS, LLC SANTA ROSA BEAC 01/07/2011 06745.00000 30-21-46.6 N MA RM WPNG423 070-56-58.6 W 0004564477 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC ABINGTON 01/07/2011 10626.25000 42-06-48.4 N GA RM WPJB321 082-07-47.8 W 0004564532 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC FOLKSTON 01/07/2011 06760.00000 30-47-23.3 N NY RM WPJA721 075-14-39.9 W 0004564546 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC SANQUOIT 01/07/2011 06606.25000 43-00-48.2 N NY RM WMW718 075-18-01.3 W 0004564588 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC NEW YORK MILLS 01/07/2011 06736.25000 43-05-58.0 N NY RM WMW718 075-18-01.3 W 0004564588 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC NEW YORK MILLS 01/07/2011 06766.25000 43-05-58.0 N WV RM WMW258 078-31-29.3 W 0004564589 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC ROMNEY 01/07/2011 06755.00000 39-15-27.7 N WV RM WMW258 078-31-29.3 W 0004564589 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC ROMNEY
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304034A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304034A1.txt
      • Commission LIONVILLE 01/04/2011 05974.85000 40-04-13.3 N PA MD KGC59 075-34-15.7 W 0004558875 Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission LIONVILLE 01/04/2011 06063.80000 40-04-13.3 N PA MD KGC59 075-34-15.7 W 0004558875 Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission LIONVILLE 01/04/2011 06755.00000 40-04-13.3 N PA MD KGC59 075-34-15.7 W 0004558875 Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission LIONVILLE 01/04/2011 06795.00000 40-04-13.3 N PA MD KGC61 075-51-59.7 W 0004558876 Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission MORGANTOWN 01/04/2011 06595.00000 40-08-01.3 N PA MD KGC61 075-51-59.7 W 0004558876 Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission MORGANTOWN 01/04/2011 06605.00000 40-08-01.3 N PA MD KGC61 075-51-59.7 W 0004558876 Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission MORGANTOWN 01/04/2011 06635.00000 40-08-01.3 N NJ MD WQMD943 075-21-32.0 W 0004560283 Salem County Information Technology DeWOODSTOWN 01/05/2011 11305.00000 39-37-47.0 N NJ MD WQMD943 075-21-32.0 W 0004560283 Salem County Information Technology DeWOODSTOWN 01/05/2011 11385.00000 39-37-47.0 N NJ
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304043A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304043A1.txt
      • 107-52-59.3 W 2 1 12/08/2010 WPQK468 FXO WORLAND, CITY OF 457.07500000 WORLAND 44-2-10.8 N WY 107-58-36.3 W 3 1 12/08/2010 WPQK468 FXO WORLAND, CITY OF 457.07500000 WORLAND 44-4-13.8 N WY 107-52-6.3 W 4 1 12/08/2010 WPQK468 FXO WORLAND, CITY OF 457.07500000 WORLAND 44-14-6.9 N WY 107-43-45.3 W 5 1 12/08/2010 WPQK468 FXO WORLAND, CITY OF 457.07500000 WORLAND 44-14-47.9 N WY 107-44-1.3 W 6 1 12/08/2010 WPQK468 MO WORLAND, CITY OF 457.07500000 WORLAND 44-7-46.8 N WY 107-54-57.3 W 7 1 Page 2 Frequency Termination Pending Call Sign Termination Date Stn Class Licensee Name Lower/Upper Frequency City Latitude State Longitude Loc./ Path ## Ant. IG - Industrial/Business Pool, Conventional Mobility Division 12/09/2010 WQFP383 MO BE & K CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC 451.30000000 -- --
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304054A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304054A1.txt
      • 2.9 3.0 3.2 3.1 3.0 Nine 2.8 2.7 2.8 2.7 2.9 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.6 2.7 Ten or More 36.9 35.0 35.3 34.0 33.5 33.1 33.6 44.7 44.0 44.0 Zero 2.2% 2.4% 2.3% 2.4% 2.4% 2.8% 2.6% 0.4% 0.5% 0.6% One 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.4 2.6 2.4 0.9 1.2 1.2 Two 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.4 2.4 1.2 1.3 1.3 Three 2.2 2.3 2.2 2.4 2.3 2.5 2.4 1.3 1.4 1.4 Four 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.2 2.2 1.3 1.5 1.5 Five 2.2 2.2 2.0 2.4 2.5 2.2 2.2 1.6 1.4 1.5 Six 1.9 2.2 1.9 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.1 1.7 1.5 1.5 Seven 2.0 2.4 2.2 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.3 1.8 1.5 1.6 Eight 2.6 2.5 2.3
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304136A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304136A1.txt
      • 23425.00000 40-41-09.0 N NY MD WQLU363 073-57-04.0 W 0004566646 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIINew York 01/11/2011 23475.00000 40-41-09.0 N Page 24 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NY MD WQLU363 073-57-04.0 W 0004566646 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIINew York 01/11/2011 23575.00000 40-41-09.0 N NY MD WQLW376 073-55-01.3 W 0004566647 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIINew York 01/11/2011 23175.00000 40-52-08.4 N NY MD WQLW376 073-55-01.3 W 0004566647 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIINew York 01/11/2011 23275.00000 40-52-08.4 N NY MD WQLW376 073-55-01.3 W 0004566647 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIINew York 01/11/2011 23325.00000 40-52-08.4 N NY MD WQLW376 073-55-01.3 W 0004566647 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIINew York 01/11/2011 23375.00000 40-52-08.4 N NY MD WQLW376 073-55-01.3
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304138A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304138A1.txt
      • Carolina State Highway Patrol Franklin 01/12/2011 06815.00000 35-10-24.3 N NC MD WQGF954 083-47-43.4 W 0004569636 North Carolina State Highway Patrol Andrews 01/12/2011 06585.00000 35-15-27.2 N NC MD WQGF954 083-47-43.4 W 0004569636 North Carolina State Highway Patrol Andrews 01/12/2011 06605.00000 35-15-27.2 N NC MD WQGF954 083-47-43.4 W 0004569636 North Carolina State Highway Patrol Andrews 01/12/2011 06645.00000 35-15-27.2 N WV MD WNTZ347 080-38-01.3 W 0004570814 JEFFERSON, COUNTY OF BEECH BOTTOM 01/13/2011 10648.12500 40-15-01.3 N WV MD WNTZ347 080-38-01.3 W 0004570814 JEFFERSON, COUNTY OF BEECH BOTTOM 01/13/2011 11365.00000 40-15-01.3 N NC MD WQKL830 082-06-16.4 W 0004571403 North Carolina State Highway Patrol Spruce Pine 01/13/2011 06755.00000 35-52-47.4 N AL MD WQIG524 086-05-42.0 W 0004571465 TALLADEGA COUNTY EMERGENCY MATALLADEGA 01/13/2011 06555.00000 33-28-41.2 N Page 2 MW
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304247A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304247A1.txt
      • 0004575764 TEXAS ELECTRONIC TRANSPORT COMD HANIS 01/18/2011 06152.75000 29-18-48.8 N TX RM KLR38 099-16-04.1 W 0004575764 TEXAS ELECTRONIC TRANSPORT COMD HANIS 01/18/2011 06226.89000 29-18-48.8 N WI RM WPNG601 091-23-45.2 W 0004575789 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC ALTOONA 01/18/2011 02162.00000 44-46-44.1 N WI RM WPNG601 091-23-45.2 W 0004575789 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC ALTOONA 01/18/2011 06760.00000 44-46-44.1 N HI RM WLN238 158-00-01.3 W 0004576702 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCKOOLAULOA 01/18/2011 06850.00000 21-39-52.5 N MA RM WPJD813 071-17-54.9 W 0004577051 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC WELLESLEY 01/18/2011 10628.75000 42-17-34.9 N CO RM WMN807 104-46-11.5 W 0004577538 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC WALSENBURG 01/18/2011 06197.24000 37-38-32.2 N CO RM WMN807 104-46-11.5 W 0004577538 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC WALSENBURG 01/18/2011 06256.54000 37-38-32.2 N WY
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304249A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304249A1.txt
      • 01/19/2011 11385.00000 26-07-55.2 N FL MD WQMS202 080-17-41.2 W 0004579075 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIPlantation 01/19/2011 17815.00000 26-07-55.2 N FL MD WQMS202 080-17-41.2 W 0004579075 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIPlantation 01/19/2011 17915.00000 26-07-55.2 N FL MD WQMS202 080-17-41.2 W 0004579075 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIPlantation 01/19/2011 23225.00000 26-07-55.2 N FL MD WQMQ810 080-12-56.1 W 0004579077 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIWest Little River 01/19/2011 11265.00000 25-51-01.3 N FL MD WQMQ810 080-12-56.1 W 0004579077 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIWest Little River 01/19/2011 11305.00000 25-51-01.3 N FL MD WQMQ810 080-12-56.1 W 0004579077 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIWest Little River 01/19/2011 11385.00000 25-51-01.3 N FL MD WQMQ810 080-12-56.1 W 0004579077 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIWest Little River 01/19/2011 11425.00000 25-51-01.3 N FL MD WQMQ810 080-12-56.1 W 0004579077 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIWest Little
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304251A1.txt
      • 089-34-16.0 W 0004579133 ONEIDA, COUNTY OF MINOQUAL 01/19/2011 06665.00000 45-47-54.7 N NC MD WQNF473 083-24-51.9 W 0004579773 North Carolina State Highway Patrol Bryson City 01/20/2011 06775.00000 35-22-53.8 N MN MD WQIQ302 091-18-59.0 W 0004581170 Minnesota, State of La Crescent 01/21/2011 11138.12500 43-51-34.6 N MN MD WQKX255 095-03-00.0 W 0004581196 Minnesota, State of ROOSEVELT 01/21/2011 06713.75000 48-47-20.0 N WV MD WNTZ347 080-38-01.3 W 0004581907 JEFFERSON, COUNTY OF BEECH BOTTOM 01/21/2011 11325.00000 40-15-01.3 N WV MD WNTZ347 080-38-01.3 W 0004581907 JEFFERSON, COUNTY OF BEECH BOTTOM 01/21/2011 11365.00000 40-15-01.3 N OH MD WNTZ344 080-39-21.0 W 0004581908 JEFFERSON, COUNTY OF STEUBENVILLE 01/21/2011 06590.62500 40-21-06.2 N OH MD WNTZ344 080-39-21.0 W 0004581908 JEFFERSON, COUNTY OF STEUBENVILLE 01/21/2011 10593.12500 40-21-06.2 N OH MD WNTZ344 080-39-21.0 W 0004581908
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304388A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304388A1.txt
      • PARTNERS SPECHalawa 01/24/2011 10775.00000 21-21-56.4 N HI MD WQLB220 157-56-10.9 W 0004585102 CLEARWIRE HAWAII PARTNERS SPECHalawa 01/24/2011 10935.00000 21-21-56.4 N HI MD WQLB220 157-56-10.9 W 0004585102 CLEARWIRE HAWAII PARTNERS SPECHalawa 01/24/2011 23025.00000 21-21-56.4 N HI MD WQLB220 157-56-10.9 W 0004585102 CLEARWIRE HAWAII PARTNERS SPECHalawa 01/24/2011 23275.00000 21-21-56.4 N HI MD WQMG388 157-53-18.6 W 0004585103 CLEARWIRE HAWAII PARTNERS SPECHonolulu 01/24/2011 21975.00000 21-21-01.3 N HI MD WQKU949 157-53-02.4 W 0004585104 CLEARWIRE HAWAII PARTNERS SPECHonolulu 01/24/2011 17915.00000 21-20-11.0 N HI MD WQKU949 157-53-02.4 W 0004585104 CLEARWIRE HAWAII PARTNERS SPECHonolulu 01/24/2011 17965.00000 21-20-11.0 N HI MD WQKU949 157-53-02.4 W 0004585104 CLEARWIRE HAWAII PARTNERS SPECHonolulu 01/24/2011 18065.00000 21-20-11.0 N HI MD WQKU949 157-53-02.4 W 0004585104 CLEARWIRE HAWAII PARTNERS SPECHonolulu 01/24/2011 21825.00000 21-20-11.0 N HI MD WQKU949
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304390A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304390A1.txt
      • 01/27/2011 19520.00000 45-02-25.8 N Page 16 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MN MD WQIP679 093-31-14.9 W 0004591874 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Plymouth 01/27/2011 19640.00000 45-02-25.8 N MN MD WQJZ987 093-31-25.3 W 0004591884 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Corcoran 01/27/2011 17960.00000 45-05-01.3 N MN MD WQJZ987 093-31-25.3 W 0004591884 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Corcoran 01/27/2011 18080.00000 45-05-01.3 N MN MD WQIL588 093-37-44.9 W 0004591888 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Medina 01/27/2011 11345.00000 45-03-51.0 N MN MD WQKC627 093-01-56.2 W 0004592026 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. WHITE BEAR LAKE 01/27/2011 19525.00000 45-05-32.9 N MN MD WQJZ989 092-58-41.9 W 0004592054 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Hugo 01/27/2011
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304520A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304520A1.txt
      • NJ MD WNEW479 074-14-04.5 W 0004602456 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF TOMS RIVER 02/04/2011 06256.54000 39-58-10.4 N NJ MD WNEW479 074-14-04.5 W 0004602456 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF TOMS RIVER 02/04/2011 06286.19000 39-58-10.4 N NJ MD WNEW472 074-48-38.6 W 0004602462 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF WOODBINE 02/04/2011 06034.15000 39-14-07.4 N NJ MD WNTY250 074-15-00.5 W 0004602465 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF Ringwood 02/04/2011 06315.84000 41-04-01.3 N MN MD WQIK926 095-33-19.5 W 0004602523 Minnesota, State of GRANITE FALLS 02/04/2011 06226.89000 44-53-43.0 N MN MD WQMI448 095-11-24.6 W 0004602530 Minnesota, State Renville 02/04/2011 05974.85000 44-51-41.7 N NJ MD WNEV773 074-54-14.0 W 0004602577 New Jersey, State of CHERRYVILLE 02/04/2011 06555.00000 40-33-16.0 N Page 9 MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304657A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304657A1.txt
      • Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City ME MD KNKA708 069-44-31.0 W 0004609953 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCHARRINGTON 02/10/2011 43-48-31.1 N ME MD KNKA708 070-16-53.0 W 0004609953 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCNew Gloucester 02/10/2011 43-59-54.3 N ME MD KNKA708 070-17-44.2 W 0004609953 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCNEW GLOUCESTER 02/10/2011 43-57-01.3 N ME MD KNKA708 069-49-40.2 W 0004609953 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCPHIPPSBURG 02/10/2011 43-50-01.8 N ME MD KNKA708 070-15-49.2 W 0004609953 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCPORTLAND 02/10/2011 43-39-17.3 N ME MD KNKA708 070-18-19.2 W 0004609953 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCPORTLAND 02/10/2011 43-43-00.3 N ME MD KNKA708 070-19-53.2 W 0004609953 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCSOUTH PORTLAND 02/10/2011 43-37-28.3 N ME MD
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304662A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304662A1.txt
      • STATE OF WOODBINE 02/09/2011 06034.15000 39-14-07.4 N Page 10 MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NJ MD WNEW472 074-48-38.6 W 0004608747 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF WOODBINE 02/09/2011 06755.00000 39-14-07.4 N NJ MD WNTY250 074-15-00.5 W 0004608748 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF Ringwood 02/09/2011 06315.84000 41-04-01.3 N NJ MD WNTY250 074-15-00.5 W 0004608748 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF Ringwood 02/09/2011 06685.00000 41-04-01.3 N NJ MD WPNC414 074-55-57.0 W 0004608753 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF BERLIN 02/09/2011 06152.75000 39-48-14.0 N NJ MD WPNC414 074-55-57.0 W 0004608753 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF BERLIN 02/09/2011 06825.00000 39-48-14.0 N NJ MD WPNC414 074-55-57.0 W 0004608753 NEW JERSEY, STATE OF BERLIN 02/09/2011 11445.00000 39-48-14.0
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304910A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304910A1.txt
      • (OWIN) WASHINGTON 02/23/2011 06286.19000 45-44-12.6 N WA MD WQHG488 121-40-52.4 W 0004627978 Oregon State (OWIN) WASHINGTON 02/23/2011 06315.84000 45-44-12.6 N WA MD WQHG488 121-40-52.4 W 0004627978 Oregon State (OWIN) WASHINGTON 02/23/2011 11215.00000 45-44-12.6 N WA MD WQHG488 121-40-52.4 W 0004627978 Oregon State (OWIN) WASHINGTON 02/23/2011 11325.00000 45-44-12.6 N WA MD WQHG252 122-04-16.2 W 0004627982 Oregon State (OWIN) WASHINGTON 02/23/2011 05945.20000 45-41-01.3 N WA MD WQHG252 122-04-16.2 W 0004627982 Oregon State (OWIN) WASHINGTON 02/23/2011 06034.15000 45-41-01.3 N WA MD WQHG252 122-04-16.2 W 0004627982 Oregon State (OWIN) WASHINGTON 02/23/2011 06063.80000 45-41-01.3 N WA MD WQHG252 122-04-16.2 W 0004627982 Oregon State (OWIN) WASHINGTON 02/23/2011 06093.45000 45-41-01.3 N OR MD WQHF919 122-33-04.1 W 0004627987 Oregon State (OWIN) Happy Valley 02/23/2011 06286.19000 45-27-16.0 N OR MD
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304911A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304911A1.txt
      • WQCS504 121-53-21.2 W 0004630631 The Internet Connection Inc D/B/A got.netSan Jose 02/24/2011 21985.00000 37-20-01.5 N CA MD WQCS899 122-01-53.0 W 0004631108 The Internet Connection Inc D/B/A got.netSanta Cruz 02/25/2011 11445.00000 36-58-57.5 N KY NE 084-33-40.6 W 0004623639 QX Networking and Design, Inc. Nicholasville 02/22/2011 19360.00000 37-54-36.3 N KY NE 084-33-01.2 W 0004623640 QX Networking and Design, Inc. Lexington-Fayette 02/22/2011 23275.00000 38-01-01.3 N Page 42 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City IL NE 087-52-31.2 W 0004623828 MPX, INC. Deerfield 02/22/2011 23285.00000 42-09-45.3 N IL NE 087-52-30.4 W 0004623829 MPX, INC. Northbrook 02/22/2011 22085.00000 42-08-57.1 N TX NE 097-33-29.2 W 0004623837 Wireless Infrastructure Partners, LLC Boyd 02/22/2011
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305045A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305045A1.txt
      • MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City IN NE 086-06-34.9 W 0004632388 EMERGENCY RADIO SERVICE, INC. Kokomo 02/28/2011 19375.00000 40-29-52.1 N TX NE 094-06-04.6 W 0004632746 Wireless Infrastructure Partners, LLC LEIGH 02/28/2011 10855.00000 32-36-14.2 N ID NE 113-37-26.5 W 0004632755 Safelink Internet Albion 02/28/2011 19525.00000 42-26-01.3 N ID NE 116-34-27.0 W 0004632758 Safelink Internet Nampa 02/28/2011 19325.00000 43-36-21.5 N ID NE 116-34-27.0 W 0004632758 Safelink Internet Nampa 02/28/2011 19425.00000 43-36-21.5 N ID NE 116-48-40.8 W 0004632759 Safelink Internet Caldwell 02/28/2011 17765.00000 43-36-29.9 N ID NE 116-55-43.7 W 0004632761 Safelink Internet Parma 02/28/2011 17865.00000 43-49-29.3 N MI NE 083-13-48.8 W 0004632920 Detroit Edison Company Detroit 02/28/2011 00928.35625
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305196A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305196A1.txt
      • Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership PALMDALE 03/07/2011 18000.00000 34-30-11.9 N CA MD WQKN235 118-09-57.5 W 0004641563 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership Lancaster 03/07/2011 10577.50000 34-41-06.1 N CA MD WQKN235 118-09-57.5 W 0004641563 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership Lancaster 03/07/2011 11525.00000 34-41-06.1 N CA MD WQKN235 118-09-57.5 W 0004641563 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership Lancaster 03/07/2011 11645.00000 34-41-06.1 N CA MD WQDM578 118-09-01.3 W 0004642464 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership Lancaster 03/08/2011 11245.00000 34-39-59.0 N CA MD WQDM578 118-09-01.3 W 0004642464 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership Lancaster 03/08/2011 11565.00000 34-39-59.0 N CA MD WQDM578 118-09-01.3 W 0004642464 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership Lancaster 03/08/2011 11687.50000 34-39-59.0 N CA MD WLT475 118-08-42.3 W 0004642465 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership PALMDALE 03/08/2011 06197.24000 34-31-47.0 N
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305197A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305197A1.txt
      • WQJC298 119-27-35.0 W 0004622588 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCTAFT 03/09/2011 11215.00000 35-07-03.0 N CA AM WQJC298 119-27-35.0 W 0004622588 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCTAFT 03/09/2011 11235.00000 35-07-03.0 N CA AM WQJC298 119-27-35.0 W 0004622588 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCTAFT 03/09/2011 11245.00000 35-07-03.0 N CO AM WQES769 104-54-04.4 W 0004624089 LP Broadband, Inc. Thornton 03/11/2011 11545.00000 39-57-01.4 N CA AM WQDM578 118-09-01.3 W 0004642464 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership Lancaster 03/11/2011 11245.00000 34-39-59.0 N CA AM WQDM578 118-09-01.3 W 0004642464 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership Lancaster 03/11/2011 11565.00000 34-39-59.0 N CA AM WQDM578 118-09-01.3 W 0004642464 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership Lancaster 03/11/2011 11687.50000 34-39-59.0 N Page 4 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305297A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305297A1.txt
      • 3.6 Eight 2.9 3.0 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.2 3.1 3.0 3.4 Nine 2.8 2.7 2.9 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.6 2.7 2.8 Ten or More 35.3 34.0 33.5 33.1 33.6 44.7 44.0 44.0 46.6 Zero 2.3% 2.4% 2.4% 2.8% 2.6% 0.4% 0.5% 0.6% 0.4% One 2.4 2.5 2.4 2.6 2.4 0.9 1.2 1.2 0.9 Two 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.4 2.4 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.0 Three 2.2 2.4 2.3 2.5 2.4 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.3 Four 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.2 2.2 1.3 1.5 1.5 1.3 Five 2.0 2.4 2.5 2.2 2.2 1.6 1.4 1.5 1.4 Six 1.9 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.1 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.3 Seven 2.2 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.3 1.8 1.5 1.6 1.4 Eight 2.3 2.5 2.4 2.8 2.8 1.7 1.8
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305322A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305322A1.txt
      • 03/17/2011 10795.00000 34-34-48.0 N AZ NE 110-27-37.3 W 0004656396 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Benson 03/17/2011 10632.50000 31-58-49.0 N AZ NE 110-23-55.2 W 0004656403 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Benson 03/17/2011 10567.50000 31-57-37.9 N VA NE 077-23-48.8 W 0004656431 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Richmond 03/17/2011 23380.00000 37-34-52.7 N VA NE 077-24-41.8 W 0004656433 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Richmond 03/17/2011 23310.00000 37-35-01.3 N VA NE 077-20-16.5 W 0004656486 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Mechanicsville 03/17/2011 22680.00000 37-36-53.1 N AL NE 088-07-07.8 W 0004656677 ALLTEL Communications, LLC Alabama Port 03/18/2011 06286.19000 30-21-25.9 N AL NE 088-07-07.8 W 0004656677 ALLTEL Communications, LLC Alabama Port 03/18/2011 06315.84000 30-21-25.9 N VA NE 076-23-59.2 W 0004657135 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. HAMPTON 03/18/2011 17790.00000 37-00-42.1 N VA NE 076-25-19.9
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305346A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305346A1.txt
      • Stn Class Licensee Name Lower/Upper Frequency City Latitude State Longitude Loc./ Path ## Ant. MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool Broadband Division 02/12/2011 WQIF501 FXO AIRCELL LLC 11265.00000000 DATIL 34-16-58.1 N NM 107-54-46.0 W2 1 02/12/2011 WQIF501 FXO AIRCELL LLC 11345.00000000 DATIL 34-16-58.1 N NM 107-54-46.0 W2 1 02/10/2011 WQKQ302 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 23025.00000000 Algonquin 42-9-47.1 N IL 88-19-1.3 W 2 1 02/11/2011 WQKQ447 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 17815.00000000 Elgin 42-4-1.5 N IL 88-15-36.1 W 1 1 02/11/2011 WQKQ447 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 17915.00000000 Elgin 42-4-1.5 N IL 88-15-36.1 W 1 1 02/11/2011 WQKQ470 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 11345.00000000 JOLIET 41-33-3.0 N IL 88-8-5.0 W 1 1 02/11/2011 WQKQ470 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305453A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305453A1.txt
      • E 03/22/2011 03650.00000 - 03700.00000 NE 0004660585 SyncWave, LLC 03/22/2011 03650.00000 - 03700.00000 NE 0004662564 Board of Water Electric & Communication 03/23/2011 03650.00000 - 03700.00000 Page 52 RP - Broadcast Auxiliary Remote Pickup State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NY NE 073-42-01.8 W 0004659764 WMHT EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICTroy 03/21/2011 00161.70000 42-41-01.3 N NY NE 073-42-01.8 W 0004659764 WMHT EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICTroy 03/21/2011 00161.76000 42-41-01.3 N TI - TV Intercity Relay State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OR AM WPNI848 123-08-33.3 W 0004530991 CALIFORNIA OREGON BROADCASTINGSALEM 03/23/2011 06950.00000 - 06975.00000 44-58-39.4 N OR AM WPJC665 123-03-43.3 W 0004531894 CALIFORNIA OREGON BROADCASTINGEugene 03/23/2011
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305657A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305657A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305657A1.txt
      • R 936 0 R 939 0 R 942 0 R]/Type/Pages/Parent 1160 0 R>> endobj 1169 0 obj<> endobj 1170 0 obj<>stream xmlns:pdf='http://ns.adobe.com/pdf/1.3/' pdf:Producer='Acrobat Distiller 6.0 (Windows)'> Microsoft Word - f-press09.doc Linda.Blake endstream endobj 1171 0 obj<> endobj xref 0 1172 0000000000 65535 f 0000015814 00000 n 0000015942 00000 n 0000016080 00000 n
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305717A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305717A1.txt
      • Lakes 04/05/2011 13100.00000 - 13125.00000 45-07-40.8 N MN NE 093-08-22.0 W 0004679273 CBS BROADCASTING INC. SHOREVIEW 04/05/2011 13200.00000 - 13225.00000 45-03-44.0 N Page 53 TP - TV Pickup State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City IL MD KB55028 P 087-37-45.5 W 0004681339 CBS BROADCASTING INC. CHICAGO 04/06/2011 02025.00000 - 02025.50000 41-53-01.3 N IL MD KB55028 P 087-37-45.5 W 0004681339 CBS BROADCASTING INC. CHICAGO 04/06/2011 02025.50000 - 02109.50000 41-53-01.3 N IL MD KB55028 P 087-37-45.5 W 0004681339 CBS BROADCASTING INC. CHICAGO 04/06/2011 02109.50000 - 02110.00000 41-53-01.3 N IL MD KB55028 P 087-37-45.5 W 0004681339 CBS BROADCASTING INC. CHICAGO 04/06/2011 02450.00000 - 02467.00000 41-53-01.3 N IL MD KB55028 P 087-37-45.5 W 0004681339 CBS
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305779A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305779A1.pdf
      • that service providers can efficiently provide services to their customers -- and I was looking at a report by CTIA, it's semiannual wireless industry survey which shows the amount of wireless usage 12 months ending June `05 when we started this debate and 12 months as of June 2010. And in June `05, for the wireless industry there was about 1.3 trillion minutes of use and only 57 billion SMS texting messages. Five years later when we're having this debate as to whether URIs are necessary for efficient routing of services to customers, the (unintelligible) the level of voice minutes of use has leveled off over the last three years at about 2.3 trillion and yet the amount of MMS SMS
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305954A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305954A1.txt
      • Name Latitude City UT MD WQKT418 111-40-38.9 W 0004687782 DIGIS LLC OREM 04/12/2011 18015.00000 40-15-50.2 N UT MD WQMG532 111-59-49.6 W 0004687785 Digis LLC Eagle Mountain 04/12/2011 17865.00000 40-21-33.7 N UT MD WQMG532 111-59-49.6 W 0004687785 Digis LLC Eagle Mountain 04/12/2011 18015.00000 40-21-33.7 N UT MD WQKT419 111-38-32.2 W 0004687792 DIGIS LLC PROVO 04/12/2011 19475.00000 40-18-00.8 N UT MD WQNP265 111-44-01.3 W 0004687800 Digis LLC Orem 04/12/2011 18115.00000 40-16-37.2 N AZ MD WQJY482 111-51-22.9 W 0004688102 Bluewire LLC Mesa 04/12/2011 17760.00000 33-23-33.3 N IL MD WQGW739 087-37-07.4 W 0004688132 Towerstream Corp. Chicago 04/12/2011 21875.00000 41-51-14.8 N IL MD WQLB324 087-52-30.9 W 0004688750 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIINorthbrook 04/13/2011 11225.00000 42-06-52.7 N IL MD WQLB324 087-52-30.9 W 0004688750 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIINorthbrook 04/13/2011
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305957A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305957A1.txt
      • 11265.00000 42-04-02.0 N IL MD WQLB509 088-08-35.0 W 0004689172 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISOUTH BARRINGT 04/13/2011 11385.00000 42-04-02.0 N IL MD WQLB509 088-08-35.0 W 0004689172 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISOUTH BARRINGT 04/13/2011 18065.00000 42-04-02.0 N IL MD WQLB509 088-08-35.0 W 0004689172 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIISOUTH BARRINGT 04/13/2011 21825.00000 42-04-02.0 N IL MD WQKN921 088-08-44.4 W 0004689177 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIStreamwood 04/13/2011 10735.00000 42-02-01.3 N IL MD WQKN921 088-08-44.4 W 0004689177 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIStreamwood 04/13/2011 10775.00000 42-02-01.3 N IL MD WQKN921 088-08-44.4 W 0004689177 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIStreamwood 04/13/2011 10815.00000 42-02-01.3 N Page 41 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City IL MD WQKN921 088-08-44.4 W 0004689177 CLEARWIRE
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306104A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306104A1.txt
      • N PA MD WPRR396 078-46-09.1 W 0004698822 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIAFALLS CREEK 04/21/2011 06256.54000 41-10-15.2 N PA MD WPRR396 078-46-09.1 W 0004698822 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIAFALLS CREEK 04/21/2011 06730.62500 41-10-15.2 N PA MD WPRR396 078-46-09.1 W 0004698822 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIAFALLS CREEK 04/21/2011 06765.00000 41-10-15.2 N PA MD WPRR396 078-46-09.1 W 0004698822 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIAFALLS CREEK 04/21/2011 06845.00000 41-10-15.2 N PA MD WPRR412 078-32-01.3 W 0004698827 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIAClearfield 04/21/2011 06197.24000 41-05-59.4 N PA MD WPRR412 078-32-01.3 W 0004698827 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIAClearfield 04/21/2011 06315.84000 41-05-59.4 N PA MD WPRR412 078-32-01.3 W 0004698827 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIAClearfield 04/21/2011 06615.00000 41-05-59.4 N PA MD WPRR412 078-32-01.3 W 0004698827 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIAClearfield 04/21/2011 06685.00000 41-05-59.4 N PA MD WPOP765 077-22-43.0 W 0004698841 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIAMILL HALL 04/21/2011 06034.15000
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306105A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306105A1.txt
      • Wireless (VAW) LLC Santa Fe 04/18/2011 35-41-17.1 N OK MD KNKA614 094-34-39.0 W 0004698080 Alltel Communications, LLC HEAVENER 04/20/2011 34-53-44.1 N FL MD KNKA595 082-08-13.8 W 0004698411 ALLTEL WIRELESS HOLDINGS, LLC Bokeelia 04/20/2011 26-41-24.9 N Page 22 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City FL MD KNKA595 081-57-01.3 W 0004698411 ALLTEL WIRELESS HOLDINGS, LLC Cape Coral 04/20/2011 26-38-03.3 N FL MD KNKA595 082-18-37.3 W 0004698411 ALLTEL WIRELESS HOLDINGS, LLC GROVE 04/20/2011 26-53-54.2 N CA MD KNKA209 117-34-33.4 W 0004699017 Los Angeles SMSA Limited PartnershipPhelan 04/21/2011 34-23-33.8 N MO MD KNKN553 094-18-36.5 W 0004699910 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Albany 04/21/2011 40-15-41.5 N MO MD KNKN553 095-04-52.7 W 0004699910
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306296A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306296A1.txt
      • Inc. Chester 04/25/2011 19380.00000 35-27-56.8 N TN NE 088-32-28.9 W 0004703856 NTCH-West Tenn, Inc. Chester 04/25/2011 19460.00000 35-27-56.8 N TN NE 088-23-44.0 W 0004703882 NTCH-West Tenn, Inc. Adamsville 04/25/2011 17980.00000 35-14-43.2 N TN NE 088-47-25.2 W 0004703890 NTCH-West Tenn, Inc. Jackson 04/25/2011 19460.00000 35-32-06.9 N TN NE 088-47-25.2 W 0004703890 NTCH-West Tenn, Inc. Jackson 04/25/2011 19540.00000 35-32-06.9 N FL NE 085-18-01.3 W 0004703968 Main Street Boadband LLC Port St. Joe 04/26/2011 10795.00000 29-48-42.5 N TN NE 088-48-39.7 W 0004704624 NTCH-West Tenn, Inc. Jackson 04/26/2011 17900.00000 35-33-47.6 N NY NE 073-48-58.5 W 0004707150 Jamaica Hospital Medical Center Jamaica 04/27/2011 17815.00000 40-42-01.2 N CO NE 108-19-04.6 W 0004707268 Xcel Energy Services Inc. Palisade 04/27/2011 06171.87500 39-08-53.6 N TX NE 097-47-05.0 W 0004708991 UNION
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306419A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306419A1.txt
      • LLC Rainsville 05/04/2011 35-59-44.7 N NM AM WQJE415 105-33-03.6 W 0004662674 Excomm, LLC Sipapu 05/04/2011 36-09-23.6 N MI MD KNKA506 086-23-20.1 W 0004712340 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Hart 05/02/2011 43-38-56.7 N MI MD KNKA506 086-22-14.4 W 0004712340 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Hart 05/02/2011 43-40-55.1 N MI MD KNKA506 086-22-59.4 W 0004712340 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Hart 05/02/2011 43-45-01.3 N MI MD KNKA506 086-22-46.4 W 0004712340 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC HART 05/02/2011 43-39-42.7 N MI MD KNKA506 086-02-41.5 W 0004712340 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Holton 05/02/2011 43-28-49.6 N MI MD KNKA506 086-11-07.0 W 0004712340 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Muskegon 05/02/2011 43-09-19.0 N MI MD KNKA506 086-15-46.5 W 0004712340 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Muskegon 05/02/2011 43-09-56.1
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306421A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306421A1.txt
      • WQDT456 081-20-18.2 W 0004715037 North Carolina State Highway Patrol Kings Mountain 05/04/2011 06605.00000 35-15-33.9 N NC MD WQDT456 081-20-18.2 W 0004715037 North Carolina State Highway Patrol Kings Mountain 05/04/2011 06685.00000 35-15-33.9 N NC MD WQDT456 081-20-18.2 W 0004715037 North Carolina State Highway Patrol Kings Mountain 05/04/2011 10557.50000 35-15-33.9 N WA MD WNEV796 121-53-34.3 W 0004715179 Pierce County ENUMCLAW 05/04/2011 06083.57000 47-07-01.3 N WA MD WNEV796 121-53-34.3 W 0004715179 Pierce County ENUMCLAW 05/04/2011 06725.00000 47-07-01.3 N WA MD WNEV796 121-53-34.3 W 0004715179 Pierce County ENUMCLAW 05/04/2011 10755.00000 47-07-01.3 N ID MD WQEF235 116-08-46.6 W 0004715183 ADA, COUNTY OF BOISE 05/04/2011 06635.00000 43-35-50.6 N ID MD WQEF235 116-08-46.6 W 0004715183 ADA, COUNTY OF BOISE 05/04/2011 06645.00000 43-35-50.6 N NY MD WIR36 075-06-03.6 W
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306653A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306653A1.txt
      • MD WPJE272 117-28-31.2 W 0004723263 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership Fontana 05/10/2011 11645.00000 34-09-10.0 N CA MD WMG849 117-06-49.1 W 0004723264 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership Yucaipa 05/10/2011 10557.50000 34-01-32.0 N CA MD WMG849 117-06-49.1 W 0004723264 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership Yucaipa 05/10/2011 11365.00000 34-01-32.0 N AL MD WLU643 086-30-15.9 W 0004723392 Alltel Communications, LLC WHITE CITY 05/10/2011 05945.20000 32-38-01.3 N AL MD WLU643 086-30-15.9 W 0004723392 Alltel Communications, LLC WHITE CITY 05/10/2011 06034.15000 32-38-01.3 N AL MD WLU643 086-30-15.9 W 0004723392 Alltel Communications, LLC WHITE CITY 05/10/2011 06063.80000 32-38-01.3 N PR MD WPSN612 066-15-38.4 W 0004723394 PR Wireless, Inc. ALBONITO 05/10/2011 06197.24000 18-07-28.4 N PR MD WPSN612 066-15-38.4 W 0004723394 PR Wireless, Inc. ALBONITO 05/10/2011 06286.19000 18-07-28.4 N PR
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306819A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306819A1.txt
      • RO WPSQ539 0004733530 MPX 05/19/2011 RO WPSQ540 0004733531 MPX 05/19/2011 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MS MD KNKQ345 088-19-42.0 W 0004730948 RCC Minnesota, Inc. Greenwood Springs 05/17/2011 33-53-40.0 N SC MD KNKA299 079-38-25.3 W 0004732028 Charleston-North Charleston MSA LimitedAWENDAW 05/18/2011 32-59-09.6 N SC MD KNKA299 079-58-01.3 W 0004732028 Charleston-North Charleston MSA LimitedCharleston 05/18/2011 32-42-44.6 N SC MD KNKA299 080-17-07.4 W 0004732028 Charleston-North Charleston MSA LimitedDelemar Crossroads 05/18/2011 32-51-22.6 N Page 13 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City SC MD KNKA299 080-23-07.3 W 0004732028 Charleston-North Charleston MSA LimitedDORCHESTER 05/18/2011 33-08-49.0 N SC MD
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306918A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306918A1.txt
      • WQKY409 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 11545.00000000 CHARLOTTE 35-12-33.8 N NC 80-55-43.1 W 1 1 04/26/2011 WQKY409 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 11505.00000000 CHARLOTTE 35-12-33.8 N NC 80-55-43.1 W 3 1 04/26/2011 WQKY409 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 11585.00000000 CHARLOTTE 35-12-33.8 N NC 80-55-43.1 W 3 1 04/26/2011 WQKY422 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 19325.00000000 Raleigh 35-45-1.3 N NC 78-42-14.9 W 2 1 04/26/2011 WQKY424 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 17865.00000000 Cary 35-43-50.5 N NC 78-48-12.0 W 2 1 Page 10 Frequency Termination Pending Call Sign Termination Date Stn Class Licensee Name Lower/Upper Frequency City Latitude State Longitude Loc./ Path ## Ant. MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool Broadband Division 04/27/2011 WQKY551 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III,
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306919A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306919A1.txt
      • Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NV NE 115-18-28.1 W 0004742335 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC LAS VEGAS 05/25/2011 17760.00000 36-07-11.4 N NV NE 115-19-44.3 W 0004742339 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC LAS VEGAS 05/25/2011 19320.00000 36-07-19.1 N AZ NE 114-35-28.3 W 0004742352 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC Bullhead City 05/25/2011 19400.00000 35-05-44.9 N TN NE 086-52-57.0 W 0004742357 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC LEWISBURG 05/25/2011 11325.00000 35-24-01.3 N TN NE 086-53-08.5 W 0004742364 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC Mooresville 05/25/2011 10755.00000 35-28-31.7 N TN NE 086-53-08.5 W 0004742364 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC Mooresville 05/25/2011 10835.00000 35-28-31.7 N TN NE 086-53-45.0 W 0004742370 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC COLUMBIA 05/25/2011 11245.00000 35-31-51.3 N TN NE 086-53-45.0 W 0004742370 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC COLUMBIA 05/25/2011 11285.00000 35-31-51.3 N TN NE 087-02-16.6
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306921A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306921A1.txt
      • EMS, CommunSalt Rock 05/24/2011 06063.80000 38-18-43.6 N WV MD WQKM913 082-13-42.1 W 0004740105 WV DHHR BPH, Office of EMS, CommunSalt Rock 05/24/2011 06123.10000 38-18-43.6 N WV MD WQKM913 082-13-42.1 W 0004740105 WV DHHR BPH, Office of EMS, CommunSalt Rock 05/24/2011 06825.00000 38-18-43.6 N MN MD WQNC211 095-53-47.0 W 0004740404 Minnesota, State of Goodridge 05/24/2011 06713.75000 48-14-27.6 N MN MD WQMQ376 095-15-01.3 W 0004740617 Minnesota, State of Thorhult 05/24/2011 06718.75000 48-13-46.8 N CA MD WPVT836 121-17-21.0 W 0004740673 STOCKTON, CITY OF Stockton 05/24/2011 17865.00000 37-59-30.0 N CA MD WQNN557 121-17-26.4 W 0004740681 STOCKTON, CITY OF Stockton 05/24/2011 19325.00000 37-57-11.9 N CA MD WQNN557 121-17-26.4 W 0004740681 STOCKTON, CITY OF Stockton 05/24/2011 19425.00000 37-57-11.9 N Page 7 MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307209A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307209A1.txt
      • 0004614457 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Tolar 06/01/2011 32-21-43.1 N TX AM KNKN457 097-28-40.9 W 0004614457 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Valley Mills 06/01/2011 31-39-21.2 N TX AM KNKN457 099-55-49.5 W 0004614457 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Winters 06/01/2011 31-57-05.9 N GA MD KNKA579 081-15-31.4 W 0004747581 Verizon Wireless of the East LP KELLER 05/31/2011 31-50-53.5 N GA MD KNKA579 081-06-01.3 W 0004747581 Verizon Wireless of the East LP SAVANNAH 05/31/2011 31-57-19.7 N TX MD KNKA221 095-31-01.1 W 0004747934 GTE MOBILNET OF SOUTH TEXAS LIMIBrazoria 05/31/2011 28-59-01.9 N MD MD KNKA779 077-36-25.0 W 0004750648 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC BOONSBORO 06/02/2011 39-32-26.0 N MD MD KNKA779 077-58-07.7 W 0004750648 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC CLEAR SPRING 06/02/2011 39-38-49.2 N MD MD
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307210A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307210A1.txt
      • LLC Pullman 06/02/2011 23125.00000 46-44-48.1 N WA AM 117-10-52.0 W 0004749245 First Step Internet LLC Pullman 06/02/2011 23175.00000 46-44-48.1 N WA AM 117-11-42.4 W 0004749246 First Step Internet LLC Pullman 06/02/2011 23025.00000 46-43-03.7 N WA AM 117-12-43.9 W 0004749248 First Step Internet LLC Pullman 06/02/2011 23075.00000 46-43-39.4 N WA AM 117-12-07.6 W 0004749249 First Step Internet LLC Pullman 06/02/2011 21975.00000 46-44-01.3 N WA AM 117-09-25.2 W 0004749251 First Step Internet LLC Pullman 06/02/2011 21925.00000 46-44-50.3 N Page 16 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City WA AM 117-10-35.4 W 0004749252 First Step Internet LLC Pullman 06/02/2011 23125.00000 46-44-07.8 N WA AM 117-10-22.8 W 0004749253 First Step
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307406A1.pdf
      • Development, PBS Interactive, to Ellen P. Goodman, FCC (June 14, 2010). Brendsel estimates that the average visitor to COVE, the PBS video streaming portal, watches ap- proximately 3 videos per month, with an average viewing time of 1 hour per month. This translates to approximately 1.39-cents/hour in stream- ing costs incurred by PBS. For the month of May 2010, approximately 1.3 million hours of video were streamed, amounting to roughly $20,000 for video streaming. 202 Memorandum Summary of Trends in Online Delivery Costs, from Eric Wolf, Project Executive, PBS, to Jason Seiken, Sr. V.P., Interactive, PBS & John McCoskey, Chief Technology O cer, PBS (July 26, 2010) (Summary of Trends in Online Delivery Costs), at 3. 203 Summary of Trends in
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307528A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307528A1.txt
      • Inc. ALTA SIERRA 06/10/2011 11425.00000 39-08-02.5 N TX NE 100-30-35.8 W 0004759770 West Central Wireless San Angleo 06/10/2011 10955.00000 31-24-31.7 N ID NE 117-00-39.8 W 0004760318 Newmax, LLC. Post Falls, ID 06/10/2011 10735.00000 47-42-07.6 N ID NE 116-49-14.1 W 0004760324 Newmax, LLC. Rathdrum, ID 06/10/2011 11225.00000 47-53-44.7 N ID NE 116-47-39.9 W 0004760328 Newmax, LLC. Coeur d Alene 06/10/2011 10955.00000 47-42-01.3 N ID NE 116-56-30.0 W 0004760335 Newmax, LLC. Post Falls 06/10/2011 11445.00000 47-39-58.0 N UT NE 111-51-26.3 W 0004760336 Cache Broadband, Inc. Logan 06/10/2011 11385.00000 41-44-11.6 N UT NE 111-51-26.3 W 0004760336 Cache Broadband, Inc. Logan 06/10/2011 11425.00000 41-44-11.6 N Page 15 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz)
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307529A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307529A1.txt
      • 06197.24000 33-41-39.3 N MS NE 088-52-29.8 W 0004760460 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatWest Point 06/10/2011 06256.54000 33-41-39.3 N MS NE 088-52-29.8 W 0004760460 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatWest Point 06/10/2011 06286.19000 33-41-39.3 N MS NE 088-52-29.8 W 0004760460 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatWest Point 06/10/2011 06404.79000 33-41-39.3 N MS NE 089-08-17.3 W 0004760461 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatWoodland 06/10/2011 05974.85000 33-48-01.3 N MS NE 089-08-17.3 W 0004760461 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatWoodland 06/10/2011 06034.15000 33-48-01.3 N MS NE 089-08-17.3 W 0004760461 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatWoodland 06/10/2011 06093.45000 33-48-01.3 N MS NE 089-08-17.3 W 0004760461 State of Mississippi Wireless CommunicatWoodland 06/10/2011 06152.75000 33-48-01.3 N Page 14 MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308078A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308078A1.txt
      • State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MI AM KNKA506 086-23-20.1 W 0004712340 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Hart 06/20/2011 43-38-56.7 N MI AM KNKA506 086-22-14.4 W 0004712340 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Hart 06/20/2011 43-40-55.1 N MI AM KNKA506 086-22-59.4 W 0004712340 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Hart 06/20/2011 43-45-01.3 N MI AM KNKA506 086-22-46.4 W 0004712340 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC HART 06/20/2011 43-39-42.7 N MI AM KNKA506 086-02-41.5 W 0004712340 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Holton 06/20/2011 43-28-49.6 N Page 25 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MI AM KNKA506 086-11-07.0 W 0004712340 New
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308079A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308079A1.txt
      • 37-30-38.3 N VA MD WQDE939 077-29-24.8 W 0004780781 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Richmond 06/24/2011 22530.00000 37-30-38.3 N VA MD WQGT596 077-28-28.2 W 0004780791 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Richmond 06/24/2011 22685.00000 37-30-19.4 N VA MD WQGT621 077-30-56.8 W 0004780825 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Richmond 06/24/2011 22710.00000 37-37-50.1 N VA MD WQNG526 077-32-24.4 W 0004780835 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Richmond 06/24/2011 21510.00000 37-38-01.3 N VA MD WQGK749 076-14-56.0 W 0004780904 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. CHESAPEAKE 06/24/2011 11545.00000 36-47-08.0 N VA MD WQGK749 076-14-56.0 W 0004780904 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. CHESAPEAKE 06/24/2011 11585.00000 36-47-08.0 N VA MD WQGK749 076-14-56.0 W 0004780904 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. CHESAPEAKE 06/24/2011 19465.00000 36-47-08.0 N VA MD WQFZ442 076-16-00.0 W 0004780934 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Chesapeake 06/24/2011 17905.00000 36-45-48.0
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308228A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308228A1.txt
      • 10795.00000 38-28-11.0 N WV NE 081-29-41.2 W 0004782111 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Pinch 06/27/2011 10745.00000 38-24-38.4 N NY NE 073-42-50.0 W 0004782206 Goosetown Network Services, LLC QUEENS 06/27/2011 10755.00000 40-45-26.0 N TX NE 097-26-10.3 W 0004783937 AirCanopy Internet Services Joshua 06/28/2011 10775.00000 32-26-26.4 N TX NE 097-11-49.2 W 0004783939 AirCanopy Internet Services Alvarado 06/28/2011 18015.00000 32-28-02.9 N TX NE 097-10-01.3 W 0004783940 AirCanopy Internet Services Alvarado 06/28/2011 10775.00000 32-30-57.4 N Page 19 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TX NE 097-14-37.5 W 0004783941 AirCanopy Internet Services Fort Worth 06/28/2011 11265.00000 32-35-23.5 N TX NE 097-14-37.5 W 0004783941 AirCanopy Internet Services
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308245A2.doc
      • Free Service from another Toll Free Service Provider and resells the Toll Free Service to its Customer. 800 Service Management System (SMS/800): The main operations support system used to create and update Toll Free records that are then downloaded to SCPs for processing Toll Free Service calls. The system is used by Resp Orgs to manage and administer SMS/800 records. 1.3 Additional Resources Additional definitions, terms and Rules may be found in: Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), TITLE 47-TELECOMMUNICATION, CHAPTER I--FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, PART 52 - NUMBERING, Subpart D - Toll Free Numbers. There is a Toll Free Numbers and a Toll Free Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) web page prepared by the FCC that may be found at: A partial listing
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308346A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308346A1.txt
      • 00468.42500 FL RM WNXI435 X 0004794902 FIORINI, JOSEPH E 07/07/2011 00469.02500 Page 26 IK - Industrial/Business Pool - Commercial, Conventional State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City FL RM WNXI435 X 0004794902 FIORINI, JOSEPH E 07/07/2011 00469.12500 FL RM WNXI435 081-47-12.3 W 0004794902 FIORINI, JOSEPH E BONITA SPRINGS 07/07/2011 00460.75000 26-19-01.3 N FL RM WNXI435 081-56-46.3 W 0004794902 FIORINI, JOSEPH E FORT MYERS 07/07/2011 00461.60000 26-33-53.3 N FL RM WNXI435 081-21-15.3 W 0004794902 FIORINI, JOSEPH E LABELLE 07/07/2011 00464.02500 26-48-47.2 N FL RM WNXI435 081-48-52.3 W 0004794902 FIORINI, JOSEPH E North Fort Myers 07/07/2011 00460.80000 26-44-31.4 N FL RM WNXI435 081-48-52.3 W 0004794902 FIORINI, JOSEPH E North Fort Myers 07/07/2011 00461.97500
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308471A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308471A1.txt
      • TX AM 097-11-49.2 W 0004783939 AirCanopy Internet Services, Inc. dba SKYAlvarado 07/12/2011 18015.00000 32-28-02.9 N Page 3 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TX AM 097-11-49.2 W 0004783939 AirCanopy Internet Services, Inc. dba SKYAlvarado 07/12/2011 19375.00000 32-28-02.9 N TX AM 097-10-01.3 W 0004783940 AirCanopy Internet Services, Inc. dba SKYAlvarado 07/12/2011 10775.00000 32-30-57.4 N TX AM 097-10-01.3 W 0004783940 AirCanopy Internet Services, Inc. dba SKYAlvarado 07/12/2011 22075.00000 32-30-57.4 N ME AM WML583 068-30-43.1 W 0004789495 MAINE RSA #4, INC. ORONO 07/11/2011 05945.20000 44-32-51.3 N ME AM WML583 068-30-43.1 W 0004789495 MAINE RSA #4, INC. ORONO 07/11/2011 06063.80000 44-32-51.3 N ME AM WML583
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308532A1.doc
      • takers, 2,936 or 93% responded to this question as follows: 596 or 20.3 % used a landline telephone; 522 or 17.8 % used a wireless telephone; 26 or 0.9 % used a captioned telephone; 47 or 1.6 % used an amplified telephone; 99 or 3.4 % used a TTY; 317 or 10.8 % used video relay service (VRS); 39 or 1.3 % used Internet relay service; 1,623 or 55.6 % had not called 9-1-1 in the last 2 years; and 95 or 3.2% checked ``other,'' and were provided an opportunity to elaborate. Examples of responses to ``Other'' for question #13: ``Which telephone device or service did respondents use to call 9-1-1?'' III.3.c. Survey Question # 14 Question # 14 asked survey
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308628A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308628A1.txt
      • CO MD WQHN339 107-06-40.9 W 0004808349 Cellular, Inc. Financial Corporation HAYDEN 07/19/2011 06412.20000 40-27-47.3 N WA MD WQHM639 121-57-18.4 W 0004808354 Seattle SMSA Limited Partnership Fall City 07/19/2011 10995.00000 47-37-39.4 N WA MD WQHM639 121-57-18.4 W 0004808354 Seattle SMSA Limited Partnership Fall City 07/19/2011 11173.12500 47-37-39.4 N WA MD WLV975 121-41-26.3 W 0004808359 Seattle SMSA Limited Partnership TANNER 07/19/2011 10618.75000 47-27-01.3 N WA MD WLV975 121-41-26.3 W 0004808359 Seattle SMSA Limited Partnership TANNER 07/19/2011 11485.00000 47-27-01.3 N WA MD WLV975 121-41-26.3 W 0004808359 Seattle SMSA Limited Partnership TANNER 07/19/2011 11663.12500 47-27-01.3 N GA MD WPOM460 084-20-12.7 W 0004808363 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC ATLANTA 07/19/2011 11035.00000 33-55-02.3 N GA MD WPOM460 084-20-12.7 W 0004808363 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC ATLANTA 07/19/2011 11132.50000 33-55-02.3
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308828A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308828A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308828A2.txt
      • on the Internet service account with the ISP. Participant's Equipment: any equipment, systems, cabling or facilities provided by the Participant and used directly or indirectly in support of the Services, excluding the Connection Equipment. ISP: the company providing broadband internet connection to the Participant during the term of this Program. 1.2 Headings in these conditions shall not affect their interpretation. 1.3 A person includes a natural person, corporate or unincorporated body (whether or not having separate legal personality). 1.4 The schedules form part of these terms and conditions. 1.5 A reference to writing or written includes faxes and e-mails. 1.6 Any obligation in these terms and conditions on a person not to do something includes, without limitation, an obligation not to
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308928A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308928A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308928A1.txt
      • District, Holy Name of Jesus School, The Center for Life Enrichment, and The Potomac School.'' Paragraph 3 is corrected to read as follows: ``ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review and/or Requests for Waiver filed by Burlington Township School District, Holy Name of Jesus, Lakewood Cheder School, The Center for Life Enrichment, and The Potomac School ARE GRANTED and their underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308978A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308978A1.txt
      • 084-59-07.8 W 0004828242 Southwestco Wireless, L.P. VILLA RICA 08/04/2011 06123.10000 33-44-11.4 N GA MD WPJF481 084-59-07.8 W 0004828242 Southwestco Wireless, L.P. VILLA RICA 08/04/2011 06256.54000 33-44-11.4 N GA MD WPJF481 084-59-07.8 W 0004828242 Southwestco Wireless, L.P. VILLA RICA 08/04/2011 06315.84000 33-44-11.4 N GA MD WPJF481 084-59-07.8 W 0004828242 Southwestco Wireless, L.P. VILLA RICA 08/04/2011 06404.79000 33-44-11.4 N OK MD WMJ808 099-26-01.3 W 0004829090 TEXAHOMA CELLULAR LIMITED PARTNALTUS 08/05/2011 05945.20000 34-39-05.2 N OK MD WMJ808 099-26-01.3 W 0004829090 TEXAHOMA CELLULAR LIMITED PARTNALTUS 08/05/2011 06004.50000 34-39-05.2 N OK MD WMJ808 099-26-01.3 W 0004829090 TEXAHOMA CELLULAR LIMITED PARTNALTUS 08/05/2011 06820.00000 34-39-05.2 N CA NE 118-15-13.1 W 0004821308 Towerstream Corp. Los Angeles 07/29/2011 19585.00000 33-56-04.4 N CA NE 118-23-23.8 W 0004821309 Towerstream Corp. Los Angeles
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308979A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308979A1.txt
      • SOUTHERN RAILWAYCHATTANOOGA 08/05/2011 06775.00000 35-03-52.2 N TN MD KBR32 085-22-09.8 W 0004829443 ALABAMA GREAT SOUTHERN RAILWAYCHATTANOOGA 08/05/2011 06785.00000 35-03-52.2 N TN MD KBR32 085-22-09.8 W 0004829443 ALABAMA GREAT SOUTHERN RAILWAYCHATTANOOGA 08/05/2011 06825.00000 35-03-52.2 N TN MD KBR32 085-22-09.8 W 0004829443 ALABAMA GREAT SOUTHERN RAILWAYCHATTANOOGA 08/05/2011 06846.25000 35-03-52.2 N TN MD KBR70 083-49-29.6 W 0004829477 NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPKNOXVILLE 08/05/2011 06226.89000 36-02-01.3 N TN MD KBR70 083-49-29.6 W 0004829477 NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPKNOXVILLE 08/05/2011 06345.49000 36-02-01.3 N IA MD WPYB215 092-54-57.0 W 0004829706 Corn Belt Power Cooperative Wellsburg 08/05/2011 06345.49000 42-22-58.9 N IA MD WPYB215 092-54-57.0 W 0004829706 Corn Belt Power Cooperative Wellsburg 08/05/2011 06375.14000 42-22-58.9 N Page 10 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309087A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309087A1.txt
      • N OK AM WMQ978 099-05-03.2 W 0004823584 TEXAHOMA CELLULAR LIMITED PARTNTIPTON 08/08/2011 06226.89000 34-30-24.2 N OK AM WMQ978 099-05-03.2 W 0004823584 TEXAHOMA CELLULAR LIMITED PARTNTIPTON 08/08/2011 06315.84000 34-30-24.2 N OK AM WMQ978 099-05-03.2 W 0004823584 TEXAHOMA CELLULAR LIMITED PARTNTIPTON 08/08/2011 06375.14000 34-30-24.2 N OK AM WMQ978 099-05-03.2 W 0004823584 TEXAHOMA CELLULAR LIMITED PARTNTIPTON 08/08/2011 06404.79000 34-30-24.2 N OK AM WMJ808 099-26-01.3 W 0004829090 TEXAHOMA CELLULAR LIMITED PARTNAltus 08/08/2011 05945.20000 34-39-05.2 N OK AM WMJ808 099-26-01.3 W 0004829090 TEXAHOMA CELLULAR LIMITED PARTNAltus 08/08/2011 06004.50000 34-39-05.2 N Page 3 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OK AM WMJ808 099-26-01.3 W 0004829090 TEXAHOMA CELLULAR
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309243A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309243A1.txt
      • 117-37-56.3 W 0004843493 Sierra Pacific Power dba NV Energy SILVER PEAK 08/17/2011 02187.20000 37-45-16.7 N Page 22 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NV MD WNEK260 117-37-56.3 W 0004843493 Sierra Pacific Power dba NV Energy SILVER PEAK 08/17/2011 06795.00000 37-45-16.7 N NV MD WNEK259 117-23-01.3 W 0004843500 Sierra Pacific Powerdba NV Energy GOLDFIELD 08/17/2011 02130.80000 37-42-03.7 N NV MD WNEK259 117-23-01.3 W 0004843500 Sierra Pacific Powerdba NV Energy GOLDFIELD 08/17/2011 02137.20000 37-42-03.7 N NV MD WNEK259 117-23-01.3 W 0004843500 Sierra Pacific Powerdba NV Energy GOLDFIELD 08/17/2011 06595.00000 37-42-03.7 N NV MD WNEK259 117-23-01.3 W 0004843500 Sierra Pacific Powerdba NV Energy GOLDFIELD 08/17/2011 06635.00000 37-42-03.7 N
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309245A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309245A1.txt
      • N Page 1 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City AZ AM 110-42-55.3 W 0004836185 Commnet Four Corners, LLC Winslow 08/16/2011 06375.14000 35-02-01.5 N AZ AM 110-42-55.3 W 0004836185 Commnet Four Corners, LLC Winslow 08/16/2011 19575.00000 35-02-01.5 N PR MD WQNC456 066-08-01.3 W 0004840671 T-MOBILE PUERTO RICO LLC Bayamon 08/16/2011 11265.00000 18-23-50.6 N PR MD WQNC456 066-08-01.3 W 0004840671 T-MOBILE PUERTO RICO LLC Bayamon 08/16/2011 11465.00000 18-23-50.6 N PR MD WQNC456 066-08-01.3 W 0004840671 T-MOBILE PUERTO RICO LLC Bayamon 08/16/2011 17960.00000 18-23-50.6 N PR MD WQNC456 066-08-01.3 W 0004840671 T-MOBILE PUERTO RICO LLC Bayamon 08/16/2011 18000.00000 18-23-50.6 N PR MD WQNC456 066-08-01.3
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309247A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309247A1.txt
      • 40-54-39.0 N Page 15 IK - Industrial/Business Pool - Commercial, Conventional State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City RO WPTN378 0004846201 MULTICOMM, INC. 08/19/2011 LP - Broadcast Auxiliary Low Power State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NJ AM P 075-03-01.3 W 0004750982 UNIVISION PHILADELPHIA LLC Newfield 08/18/2011 00054.00000 - 00072.00000 39-33-13.6 N NJ AM P 075-03-01.3 W 0004750982 UNIVISION PHILADELPHIA LLC Newfield 08/18/2011 00174.00000 - 00216.00000 39-33-13.6 N NJ AM P 075-03-01.3 W 0004750982 UNIVISION PHILADELPHIA LLC Newfield 08/18/2011 00470.00000 - 00488.00000 39-33-13.6 N NJ AM P 075-03-01.3 W 0004750982 UNIVISION PHILADELPHIA LLC Newfield 08/18/2011 00494.00000 - 00608.00000 39-33-13.6 N
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309249A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309249A1.txt
      • 06755.00000 41-03-05.0 N PA MD WPOP765 077-22-43.0 W 0004839447 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania MILL HALL 08/15/2011 06785.00000 41-03-05.0 N PA MD WPOP765 077-22-43.0 W 0004839447 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania MILL HALL 08/15/2011 06795.00000 41-03-05.0 N PA MD WPOP765 077-22-43.0 W 0004839447 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania MILL HALL 08/15/2011 06855.00000 41-03-05.0 N PA MD WPSS660 077-20-37.4 W 0004839448 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania WATERVILLE 08/15/2011 06063.80000 41-19-01.3 N PA MD WPSS660 077-20-37.4 W 0004839448 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania WATERVILLE 08/15/2011 06698.75000 41-19-01.3 N PA MD WPSL662 077-34-40.6 W 0004839449 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Renovo 08/15/2011 06197.24000 41-27-15.7 N PA MD WPSL662 077-34-40.6 W 0004839449 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Renovo 08/15/2011 06256.54000 41-27-15.7 N PA MD WPSL662 077-34-40.6 W 0004839449 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Renovo 08/15/2011 06315.84000 41-27-15.7 N PA MD WPSL662
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309456A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309456A1.txt
      • KNKN572 093-37-45.8 W 0004862558 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC WINNEBAGO 09/02/2011 43-16-57.8 N VA MD KNKN791 082-50-38.9 W 0004862565 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Big Stone Gap 09/02/2011 36-46-52.9 N VA MD KNKN791 082-47-24.0 W 0004862565 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Big Stone Gap 09/02/2011 36-50-33.0 N VA MD KNKN791 083-36-41.4 W 0004862565 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Ewing 09/02/2011 36-36-01.3 N Page 36 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City VA MD KNKN791 082-02-13.2 W 0004862565 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Honaker 09/02/2011 37-03-04.9 N VA MD KNKN791 083-07-38.7 W 0004862565 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Jonesville 09/02/2011 36-39-52.4 N VA MD KNKN791 082-11-03.0 W 0004862565 New
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309559A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309559A1.txt
      • N MI AM KNKN834 083-57-29.0 W 0004714561 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Rogers City 09/06/2011 45-24-52.0 N MI AM KNKN834 083-26-34.4 W 0004714561 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Spruce 09/06/2011 44-51-24.9 N MI AM KNKN834 084-36-53.2 W 0004714561 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC TOPINABEE 09/06/2011 45-29-39.0 N MI AM KNKN834 084-36-04.6 W 0004714561 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Wolverine 09/06/2011 45-21-01.3 N TX MD KNKN458 100-14-07.3 W 0004865101 WWC TEXAS RSA LIMITED PARTNERSSonora 09/06/2011 30-27-13.7 N MN MD KNKA822 096-29-54.3 W 0004867160 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Ada 09/07/2011 47-14-13.0 N ND MD KNKA822 097-24-10.6 W 0004867160 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Ayr 09/07/2011 47-08-16.6 N ND MD KNKA822 097-17-09.0 W 0004867160 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC CASSELTON 09/07/2011 46-54-13.0 N
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309689A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309689A1.txt
      • Houston 09/16/2011 11265.00000 29-51-04.1 N TX MD WQOB961 095-30-27.8 W 0004877718 Franklin Group Inc. Houston 09/16/2011 11345.00000 29-51-04.1 N TX MD WQOB961 095-30-27.8 W 0004877718 Franklin Group Inc. Houston 09/16/2011 11365.00000 29-51-04.1 N WY MD WNTA926 107-55-50.2 W 0004877880 PACIFICORP JEFFERY CITY 09/16/2011 06286.19000 42-12-18.8 N MT NE 109-25-11.6 W 0004875833 NorthWestern Corporation/Utility TelecomLewistown 09/15/2011 06765.00000 47-03-53.9 N NV NE 115-33-01.3 W 0004876579 Barrick Gold of North America - Bald Mtn MEly 09/15/2011 11225.00000 39-57-08.5 N NV NE 115-33-01.3 W 0004876579 Barrick Gold of North America - Bald Mtn MEly 09/15/2011 11305.00000 39-57-08.5 N Page 23 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MT NE 111-30-39.9
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309701A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309701A1.txt
      • WQLJ280 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 10735.00000000 STEELTON 40-14-37.6 N PA 76-50-37.0 W 3 1 08/05/2011 WQLJ280 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 10855.00000000 STEELTON 40-14-37.6 N PA 76-50-37.0 W 3 1 08/05/2011 WQLJ280 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 10855.00000000 STEELTON 40-14-37.6 N PA 76-50-37.0 W 3 1 08/05/2011 WQLJ284 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 19375.00000000 Hampden 40-14-1.3 N PA 76-58-7.0 W 1 1 08/05/2011 WQLJ284 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 19375.00000000 Hampden 40-14-1.3 N PA 76-58-7.0 W 1 1 08/05/2011 WQLJ284 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 19475.00000000 Hampden 40-14-1.3 N PA 76-58-7.0 W 1 1 08/05/2011 WQLJ284 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 19475.00000000 Hampden 40-14-1.3 N PA 76-58-7.0 W 1 1 08/05/2011 WQLJ284 FXO
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309881A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309881A1.txt
      • 27-12-27.0 N FL NE 081-20-45.5 W 0004879798 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC LAKE PLACID 09/19/2011 11265.00000 27-04-03.9 N Page 24 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City FL NE 081-20-45.5 W 0004879798 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC LAKE PLACID 09/19/2011 11385.00000 27-04-03.9 N FL NE 080-34-01.3 W 0004879799 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC FORT PIERCE 09/19/2011 05945.20000 27-29-00.0 N FL NE 080-34-01.3 W 0004879799 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC FORT PIERCE 09/19/2011 06004.50000 27-29-00.0 N FL NE 080-49-50.3 W 0004879800 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC Okeechobee 09/19/2011 11505.00000 27-15-03.1 N FL NE 080-49-50.3 W 0004879800 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC Okeechobee 09/19/2011 11585.00000 27-15-03.1 N FL NE 080-50-07.7 W 0004879801 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC Okeechobee
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310160A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310160A1.txt
      • IA MD WPUW280 090-45-56.0 W 0004889805 DUBUQUE CELLULAR TELEPHONE, L.PDUBUQUE 09/27/2011 10765.00000 42-30-13.0 N WA MD WPJF821 124-04-02.6 W 0004889910 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC GRAYLAND 09/27/2011 06151.51500 46-48-42.3 N WA MD WPJF821 124-04-02.6 W 0004889910 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC GRAYLAND 09/27/2011 06286.19000 46-48-42.3 N UT MD WQOB844 111-41-14.5 W 0004890341 Digis LLC Orem 09/27/2011 19425.00000 40-17-05.2 N OR MD WPRU842 122-50-01.3 W 0004890364 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCEagle Point 09/27/2011 06004.50000 42-29-38.2 N OR MD WPRU842 122-50-01.3 W 0004890364 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCEagle Point 09/27/2011 06601.25000 42-29-38.2 N Page 14 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OR MD WPRU843 122-36-31.3
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310261A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310261A1.txt
      • 100% or more aDSL 4.9 10.2 11.1 25.6 20.4 13.2 7.5 3.4 2.4 0.7 0.7 sDSL 95.1 4.6 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Other Wireline 98.8 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cable Modem 6.4 4.2 4.3 13.2 16.7 16.3 14.1 10.5 9.5 2.7 2.1 FTTP 80.7 7.6 1.7 2.7 2.0 1.7 1.3 1.0 0.9 0.3 0.2 Satellite 46.4 48.6 3.7 1.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Fixed Wireless 85.4 11.6 1.6 1.0 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Power Line 99.9 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 All Other 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 0.7 0.4 0.6 3.5
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310264A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310264A1.txt
      • 2.9 3.0 3.2 3.1 3.0 3.4 3.5 Nine 2.8 2.7 2.9 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.6 2.7 2.8 3.0 Ten or More 35.3 34.0 33.5 33.1 33.6 44.7 44.0 44.0 46.6 45.7 Zero 2.3% 2.4% 2.4% 2.8% 2.6% 0.4% 0.5% 0.6% 0.4% 0.4% One 2.4 2.5 2.4 2.6 2.4 0.9 1.2 1.2 0.9 0.8 Two 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.4 2.4 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.0 1.1 Three 2.2 2.4 2.3 2.5 2.4 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.2 Four 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.2 2.2 1.3 1.5 1.5 1.3 1.3 Five 2.0 2.4 2.5 2.2 2.2 1.6 1.4 1.5 1.4 1.4 Six 1.9 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.1 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.3 1.5 Seven 2.2 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.3 1.8 1.5 1.6 1.4 1.5 Eight 2.3
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310317A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310317A1.txt
      • N ID AM KOU44 116-32-56.6 W 0004828631 Frontier Communications Northwest Inc.SANDPOINT 10/04/2011 10835.00000 48-16-34.7 N ID AM KOU44 116-32-56.6 W 0004828631 Frontier Communications Northwest Inc.SANDPOINT 10/04/2011 10915.00000 48-16-34.7 N ID AM KOU44 116-32-56.6 W 0004828631 Frontier Communications Northwest Inc.SANDPOINT 10/04/2011 10955.00000 48-16-34.7 N ID AM KOU44 116-32-56.6 W 0004828631 Frontier Communications Northwest Inc.SANDPOINT 10/04/2011 10995.00000 48-16-34.7 N OK AM WMJ808 099-26-01.3 W 0004829090 TEXAHOMA CELLULAR LIMITED PARTNAltus 10/03/2011 05945.20000 34-39-05.2 N OK AM WMJ808 099-26-01.3 W 0004829090 TEXAHOMA CELLULAR LIMITED PARTNAltus 10/03/2011 05974.85000 34-39-05.2 N Page 2 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OK AM WMJ808 099-26-01.3 W 0004829090 TEXAHOMA CELLULAR
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310456A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310456A1.txt
      • GM MD KQH3 091-20-35.1 W 0004908408 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc OFFSHORE 10/11/2011 00128.90000 28-08-17.9 N TX MD WLJ3 094-47-22.0 W 0004908415 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc Galveston 10/11/2011 00136.50000 29-18-23.0 N LA MD KYU7 090-12-11.7 W 0004908456 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc Harahan 10/11/2011 00130.10000 29-58-13.3 N TX MD WQFN827 096-57-00.9 W 0004908460 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc South Padre Island 10/11/2011 00136.50000 26-01-01.3 N GM MD KNM5 093-27-26.7 W 0004908466 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc OFFSHORE 10/11/2011 00130.10000 28-01-07.7 N GM MD KLK4 097-23-31.0 W 0004908496 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc OFFSHORE 10/11/2011 00131.10000 27-48-00.0 N GM MD KYL4 093-57-17.1 W 0004908502 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc OFFSHORE 10/11/2011 00131.67500 29-19-16.1 N TX MD WFC8 098-23-29.1 W 0004908520 Aviation Spectrum Resources Inc Corpus Christi 10/11/2011 00129.47500
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310633A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310633A1.txt
      • MD KNKA595 081-42-02.4 W 0004916034 ALLTEL WIRELESS HOLDINGS, LLC Alva 10/18/2011 26-42-19.2 N FL MD KNKA595 082-08-13.8 W 0004916034 ALLTEL WIRELESS HOLDINGS, LLC Bokeelia 10/18/2011 26-41-24.9 N FL MD KNKA595 081-46-20.0 W 0004916034 ALLTEL WIRELESS HOLDINGS, LLC Bonita Springs 10/18/2011 26-19-31.0 N FL MD KNKA595 081-57-23.3 W 0004916034 ALLTEL WIRELESS HOLDINGS, LLC Cape Coral 10/18/2011 26-33-43.3 N FL MD KNKA595 081-57-01.3 W 0004916034 ALLTEL WIRELESS HOLDINGS, LLC Cape Coral 10/18/2011 26-38-03.3 N FL MD KNKA595 082-01-31.0 W 0004916034 ALLTEL WIRELESS HOLDINGS, LLC CAPE CORAL 10/18/2011 26-38-25.0 N FL MD KNKA595 081-48-09.3 W 0004916034 ALLTEL WIRELESS HOLDINGS, LLC ESTERO 10/18/2011 26-25-50.3 N FL MD KNKA595 081-52-11.3 W 0004916034 ALLTEL WIRELESS HOLDINGS, LLC FORT MYERS 10/18/2011 26-32-26.3 N FL MD KNKA595 081-51-32.3 W
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310654A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310654A1.txt
      • FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 19440.00000000 Santa Maria 34-50-5.6 N CA 120-23-0.0 W 1 1 09/17/2011 WQLN815 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 19525.00000000 Santa Barbara 34-26-55.0 N CA 119-46-29.3 W1 1 09/17/2011 WQLN815 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 19625.00000000 Santa Barbara 34-26-55.0 N CA 119-46-29.3 W1 1 09/17/2011 WQLN817 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 19575.00000000 Goleta 34-26-1.3 N CA 119-48-46.8 W1 1 09/17/2011 WQLN817 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 19675.00000000 Goleta 34-26-1.3 N CA 119-48-46.8 W1 1 09/17/2011 WQLN819 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 23025.00000000 Costa Mesa 33-37-42.1 N CA 117-54-35.0 W1 1 09/17/2011 WQLN819 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 23175.00000000 Costa Mesa 33-37-42.1 N CA 117-54-35.0 W1 1 Page 20 Frequency Termination Pending
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310779A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310779A1.txt
      • WQLG407 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 21725.00000000 Alexandria 38-48-25.9 N VA 77-4-40.1 W 6 1 09/26/2011 WQLG408 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 18015.00000000 Ashburn 38-59-56.1 N VA 77-28-44.8 W 3 1 09/25/2011 WQLG409 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 21825.00000000 Bowie 38-59-43.4 N MD 76-47-58.6 W 3 1 09/25/2011 WQLG584 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 23125.00000000 Arlington 38-52-1.3 N VA 77-4-20.8 W 4 1 09/26/2011 WQLG751 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 22225.00000000 Gaithersburg 39-6-58.3 N MD 77-15-4.3 W 2 1 09/26/2011 WQLG751 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 19375.00000000 Gaithersburg 39-6-58.3 N MD 77-15-4.3 W 3 1 09/26/2011 WQLG751 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 19475.00000000 Gaithersburg 39-6-58.3 N MD 77-15-4.3 W 3 1 09/29/2011 WQLH315 FXO
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310781A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310781A1.txt
      • Newton 10/28/2011 00946.37500 41-42-42.0 N IA MD WPXI268 093-01-47.9 W 0004932097 NEWTON LICENSE CO, LLC Newton 10/28/2011 00946.50000 41-42-42.0 N IA MD WPXI268 093-01-47.9 W 0004932097 NEWTON LICENSE CO, LLC Newton 10/28/2011 00946.62500 41-42-42.0 N GA NE 081-08-49.0 W 0004927262 CLEAR CHANNEL BROADCASTING LICSAVANNAH 10/25/2011 00948.00000 32-05-24.0 N CT NE 072-42-28.8 W 0004929695 HARTFORD BOARD OF EDUCATION Hartford 10/27/2011 00948.00000 41-48-01.3 N VA NE 078-54-10.7 W 0004930211 VIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION, INC. Lovingston 10/27/2011 00948.50000 37-47-53.3 N VA NE 079-05-23.0 W 0004930218 VIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION, INC. Rustburg 10/27/2011 00945.50000 37-17-08.7 N VA NE 078-47-53.1 W 0004930236 VIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION, INC. Waynesboro 10/27/2011 00951.50000 38-03-58.5 N LA NE 092-07-01.2 W 0004931149 MEDIA MINISTRIES, INC. MONROE 10/28/2011 00949.25000 32-30-09.6 N CF - Common Carrier
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310782A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310782A1.txt
      • WPOR656 079-24-46.2 W 0004880158 USCOC OF CUMBERLAND, LLC OAKLAND 10/28/2011 06093.45000 39-24-32.5 N MD AM WPOR656 079-24-46.2 W 0004880158 USCOC OF CUMBERLAND, LLC OAKLAND 10/28/2011 06123.10000 39-24-32.5 N MD AM WPOR656 079-24-46.2 W 0004880158 USCOC OF CUMBERLAND, LLC OAKLAND 10/28/2011 06595.00000 39-24-32.5 N MD AM WPOR656 079-24-46.2 W 0004880158 USCOC OF CUMBERLAND, LLC OAKLAND 10/28/2011 11627.50000 39-24-32.5 N TX AM 097-39-01.3 W 0004880416 AIRCANOPY INTERNET SERVICES SPRINGTOWN 10/28/2011 10735.00000 32-55-39.4 N TX AM 097-39-01.3 W 0004880416 AIRCANOPY INTERNET SERVICES SPRINGTOWN 10/28/2011 10895.00000 32-55-39.4 N TX AM 097-39-01.3 W 0004880416 AIRCANOPY INTERNET SERVICES SPRINGTOWN 10/28/2011 17865.00000 32-55-39.4 N TX AM 097-47-09.6 W 0004889806 AIRCANOPY INTERNET SERVICES Weatherford 10/28/2011 11265.00000 32-49-55.5 N TX AM 097-47-09.6 W 0004889806 AIRCANOPY INTERNET SERVICES Weatherford 10/28/2011 11385.00000
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310888A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310888A1.txt
      • 05974.85000 40-21-23.1 N KS NE 100-51-07.5 W 0004934952 NE Colorado Cellular, Inc. Oakley 11/01/2011 06256.50000 38-54-08.6 N NE NE 100-32-05.0 W 0004934953 NE Colorado Cellular, Inc. Valentine (South) 11/01/2011 06034.15000 42-39-47.6 N NE NE 100-32-05.0 W 0004934954 NE Colorado Cellular, Inc. Valentine (South) 11/01/2011 06093.45000 42-39-47.6 N NE NE 098-21-29.9 W 0004934955 NE Colorado Cellular, Inc. Grand Island 11/01/2011 11632.50000 40-55-01.3 N NC NE 080-45-37.0 W 0004935077 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC CHARLOTTE 11/01/2011 11465.00000 35-19-07.0 N NC NE 080-41-30.3 W 0004935078 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC Concord 11/01/2011 10975.00000 35-21-01.0 N SC NE 079-54-16.4 W 0004935243 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC TIMMONSVILLE 11/01/2011 10755.00000 34-06-15.4 N WI NE 090-10-37.1 W 0004935259 Wisconsin RSA #7 Limited Partnership Marshfield 11/01/2011 11225.00000 44-40-40.1 N WI
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311026A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311026A1.txt
      • N CO NE 104-56-06.3 W 0004948391 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Colorado Springs 11/09/2011 11525.00000 38-36-45.1 N CO NE 104-58-08.2 W 0004948404 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Clinton 11/09/2011 10835.00000 38-31-42.8 N VA NE 079-18-16.8 W 0004948916 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Forest 11/10/2011 10755.00000 37-25-19.6 N VA NE 079-18-14.2 W 0004948943 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Forest 11/10/2011 11245.00000 37-22-01.3 N TX NE 102-28-54.0 W 0004948968 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Andrews 11/10/2011 05974.85000 32-08-04.7 N PR NE 066-47-07.1 W 0004948980 T-MOBILE PUERTO RICO LLC Guayanilla 11/10/2011 11095.00000 18-01-09.1 N Page 19 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TX NE
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311141A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311141A1.txt
      • 35-41-24.3 N TX MD KNKN425 101-58-21.2 W 0004958733 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Dumas 11/18/2011 35-50-53.9 N TX MD KNKN425 102-09-42.6 W 0004958733 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Dumas 11/18/2011 35-52-04.4 N TX MD KNKN425 101-48-39.4 W 0004958733 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Dumas 11/18/2011 35-52-44.3 N TX MD KNKN425 101-58-42.5 W 0004958733 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC DUMAS 11/18/2011 35-53-01.3 N NM MD KNKN425 103-02-47.5 W 0004958733 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Glen Rio 11/18/2011 35-10-14.8 N TX MD KNKN425 102-23-00.2 W 0004958733 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC HARTLEY 11/18/2011 35-51-47.0 N TX MD KNKN425 102-48-59.7 W 0004958733 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Hereeford 11/18/2011 34-57-33.3 N TX MD KNKN425 102-24-23.9 W 0004958733 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Hereford 11/18/2011
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311142A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311142A1.txt
      • LLC HENRYETTA 11/18/2011 06226.89000 35-26-09.9 N OK NE 095-57-53.3 W 0004960004 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC HENRYETTA 11/18/2011 05974.85000 35-20-29.0 N Page 22 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City VA NE 077-04-22.1 W 0004960185 airBand Communications, Inc. Arlington 11/18/2011 23475.00000 38-52-01.3 N AR NE 091-55-51.1 W 0004960209 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC WILMAR 11/18/2011 06197.24000 33-39-15.2 N AR NE 091-55-51.1 W 0004960209 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC WILMAR 11/18/2011 06345.49000 33-39-15.2 N AR NE 092-04-30.7 W 0004960310 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Warren 11/18/2011 06004.50000 33-36-45.3 N AR NE 092-04-30.7 W 0004960310 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Warren 11/18/2011 06093.45000 33-36-45.3
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311143A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311143A1.txt
      • N PA MD WQLJ290 076-39-43.8 W 0004960714 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHershey 11/18/2011 11425.00000 40-15-02.8 N PA MD WQLJ290 076-39-43.8 W 0004960714 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHershey 11/18/2011 11625.00000 40-15-02.8 N PA MD WQLJ290 076-39-43.8 W 0004960714 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHershey 11/18/2011 19325.00000 40-15-02.8 N PA MD WQLJ290 076-39-43.8 W 0004960714 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHershey 11/18/2011 23025.00000 40-15-02.8 N PA MD WQLJ294 076-51-01.3 W 0004960720 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHarrisburg 11/18/2011 17765.00000 40-16-17.8 N PA MD WQLJ294 076-51-01.3 W 0004960720 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIHarrisburg 11/18/2011 19525.00000 40-16-17.8 N PA MD WQLI812 076-48-15.5 W 0004960724 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIColonial Park 11/18/2011 11305.00000 40-18-19.1 N PA MD WQLI812 076-48-15.5 W 0004960724 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIColonial Park 11/18/2011 11425.00000 40-18-19.1 N PA MD WQLI812 076-48-15.5 W 0004960724
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311144A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311144A1.txt
      • 36-35-32.4 N CA NE 119-27-10.0 W 0004956458 Kings Canyon Unified School District Reedley 11/16/2011 23375.00000 36-35-32.4 N CA NE 119-26-20.0 W 0004956459 Kings Canyon Unified School District Reedley 11/16/2011 23225.00000 36-35-34.5 N CA NE 119-26-20.0 W 0004956459 Kings Canyon Unified School District Reedley 11/16/2011 23325.00000 36-35-34.5 N CA NE 119-26-35.3 W 0004956460 Kings Canyon Unified School District Reedley 11/16/2011 23025.00000 36-36-01.3 N CA NE 119-26-35.3 W 0004956460 Kings Canyon Unified School District Reedley 11/16/2011 23225.00000 36-36-01.3 N CA NE 119-26-35.3 W 0004956460 Kings Canyon Unified School District Reedley 11/16/2011 23275.00000 36-36-01.3 N CA NE 119-26-35.3 W 0004956460 Kings Canyon Unified School District Reedley 11/16/2011 23425.00000 36-36-01.3 N CA NE 119-26-44.2 W 0004956461 Kings Canyon Unified School District Reedley 11/16/2011 21825.00000 36-36-02.8
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311160A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311160A1.txt
      • HOLDINGS III, LLC 19625.00000000 Houston 29-42-54.8 N TX 95-23-55.6 W 3 1 10/16/2011 WQLS837 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 22025.00000000 Missouri City 29-35-1.7 N TX 95-31-22.5 W 1 1 10/16/2011 WQLS838 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 22075.00000000 HOUSTON 29-42-52.8 N TX 95-33-14.8 W 1 1 10/16/2011 WQLS839 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 11545.00000000 Houston 29-47-47.6 N TX 95-18-1.3 W 1 1 10/16/2011 WQLS839 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 11625.00000000 Houston 29-47-47.6 N TX 95-18-1.3 W 1 1 Page 19 Frequency Termination Pending Call Sign Termination Date Stn Class Licensee Name Lower/Upper Frequency City Latitude State Longitude Loc./ Path ## Ant. MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool Broadband Division 10/16/2011 WQLS839 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 11305.00000000 Houston
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311248A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311248A1.txt
      • SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 18115.00000000 New York City 40-50-1.7 N NY 73-56-40.6 W 1 1 10/21/2011 WQLT599 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 21875.00000000 Valley Stream 40-38-42.7 N NY 73-42-13.3 W 2 1 10/21/2011 WQLT604 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 22225.00000000 Paramus 40-56-45.2 N NJ 74-5-38.5 W 1 1 10/21/2011 WQLT606 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 11225.00000000 Springfield 40-41-1.3 N NJ 74-20-0.3 W 2 1 10/21/2011 WQLT606 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 11385.00000000 Springfield 40-41-1.3 N NJ 74-20-0.3 W 2 1 10/21/2011 WQLT606 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 11465.00000000 Springfield 40-41-1.3 N NJ 74-20-0.3 W 3 1 10/21/2011 WQLT606 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 11545.00000000 Springfield 40-41-1.3 N NJ 74-20-0.3 W 3 1 10/21/2011 WQLT611 FXO
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311375A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311375A1.txt
      • WQIR526 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II LLC 23125.00000000 ALPHARETTA 34-3-20.0 N GA 84-18-19.0 W 3 1 11/03/2011 WQIR622 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II LLC 18115.00000000 Atlanta 33-55-42.1 N GA 84-22-51.2 W 4 1 10/30/2011 WQIT310 FXO Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II, LLC 23025.00000000 Atlanta 33-40-20.7 N GA 84-29-48.2 W 3 1 11/03/2011 WQIY535 FXO Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II, LLC 19525.00000000 ATLANTA 33-47-1.3 N GA 84-24-33.7 W 7 1 11/03/2011 WQLD248 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 11225.00000000 Frisco 33-9-32.8 N TX 96-49-24.2 W 2 1 11/03/2011 WQLD255 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 23075.00000000 Frisco 33-8-55.2 N TX 96-48-27.6 W 4 1 11/03/2011 WQLD417 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 11015.00000000 DALLAS 32-44-56.0 N TX 96-53-53.0 W 6 1 11/03/2011 WQLD426 FXO
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311377A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311377A1.txt
      • Port Townsend 11/29/2011 10995.00000 48-06-48.8 N WA MD WPXH869 122-48-38.8 W 0004970908 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Port Townsend 11/29/2011 11035.00000 48-06-48.8 N WA MD WPXH869 122-48-38.8 W 0004970908 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Port Townsend 11/29/2011 11075.00000 48-06-48.8 N WA MD WPXH869 122-48-38.8 W 0004970908 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Port Townsend 11/29/2011 11115.00000 48-06-48.8 N OK MD WMJ808 099-26-01.3 W 0004970931 TEXAHOMA CELLULAR LIMITED PARTNALTUS 11/29/2011 05945.20000 34-39-05.2 N OK MD WMJ808 099-26-01.3 W 0004970931 TEXAHOMA CELLULAR LIMITED PARTNALTUS 11/29/2011 06034.15000 34-39-05.2 N OK MD WMJ808 099-26-01.3 W 0004970931 TEXAHOMA CELLULAR LIMITED PARTNALTUS 11/29/2011 06820.00000 34-39-05.2 N ID MD WPON684 116-49-22.0 W 0004970944 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Spirit Lake 11/29/2011 10622.50000 47-56-52.0 N ID MD WPON684 116-49-22.0 W 0004970944
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311482A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311482A1.txt
      • 12/07/2011 00131.82500 42-23-43.7 N CA NE 118-24-29.0 W 0004983188 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Los Angeles 12/07/2011 00131.27500 33-56-32.9 N CA NE 122-13-14.6 W 0004983190 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Oakland 12/07/2011 00130.57500 37-43-16.6 N GA NE 084-11-40.1 W 0004983196 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Albany 12/07/2011 00129.10000 31-32-07.9 N TX NE 098-28-11.2 W 0004983202 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc San Antonio 12/07/2011 00129.70000 29-32-01.3 N TX NE 098-28-11.2 W 0004983209 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc San Antonio 12/07/2011 00130.62500 29-32-01.3 N HI NE 155-02-54.5 W 0004983212 Aviation Spectrum Resources, Inc Hilo 12/07/2011 00131.95000 19-43-12.9 N AS - Aural Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA MD WPWB467 122-43-26.0 W 0004982177 SINCLAIR
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311483A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311483A1.txt
      • LP Wetumpka 12/07/2011 06004.50000 32-32-06.0 N AL MD WQEI484 086-11-33.0 W 0004983375 Verizon Wireless of The East LP Wetumpka 12/07/2011 06795.00000 32-32-06.0 N AL MD WQEI484 086-11-33.0 W 0004983375 Verizon Wireless of The East LP Wetumpka 12/07/2011 11325.00000 32-32-06.0 N AL MD WQEI484 086-11-33.0 W 0004983375 Verizon Wireless of The East LP Wetumpka 12/07/2011 11405.00000 32-32-06.0 N OR MD WQCA350 122-35-01.3 W 0004983524 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Leaburg 12/07/2011 06286.19000 44-07-30.5 N OR MD WQCA350 122-35-01.3 W 0004983524 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Leaburg 12/07/2011 10593.12500 44-07-30.5 N GA MD WQMP553 084-23-27.6 W 0004983527 MPX, Inc. Atlanta 12/07/2011 23170.00000 33-45-21.5 N GA MD WQMP554 084-23-43.8 W 0004983528 MPX, Inc. Atlanta 12/07/2011 21970.00000 33-47-31.1 N NV MD WQDX506 116-01-00.4 W 0004983586 WWC License
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311489A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311489A1.txt
      • CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 17915.00000000 Ewing 40-15-2.9 N NJ 74-47-35.7 W 1 1 11/10/2011 WQLW375 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 21825.00000000 Fontana 34-5-41.4 N CA 117-26-17.5 W1 1 11/10/2011 WQLW375 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 21975.00000000 Fontana 34-5-41.4 N CA 117-26-17.5 W1 1 11/10/2011 WQLW376 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 23325.00000000 New York 40-52-8.4 N NY 73-55-1.3 W 3 1 Page 16 Frequency Termination Pending Call Sign Termination Date Stn Class Licensee Name Lower/Upper Frequency City Latitude State Longitude Loc./ Path ## Ant. MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool Broadband Division 11/10/2011 WQLW376 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 23475.00000000 New York 40-52-8.4 N NY 73-55-1.3 W 3 1 11/10/2011 WQLW380 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 23225.00000000
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311602A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311602A1.txt
      • New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC THREE RIVER 12/16/2011 42-01-43.0 N MI AM KNKN857 085-38-15.0 W 0004860102 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC THREE RIVERS 12/16/2011 41-55-43.0 N MI AM KNKN857 085-47-51.7 W 0004860102 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC White Pigeon 12/16/2011 41-48-29.9 N GA AM KNKQ280 083-15-50.5 W 0004861243 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Alapaha 12/12/2011 31-17-00.0 N GA AM KNKQ280 083-54-01.3 W 0004861243 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Doerun 12/12/2011 31-17-51.9 N GA AM KNKQ280 082-55-14.1 W 0004861243 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC FARGO 12/12/2011 30-43-11.0 N GA AM KNKQ280 082-07-47.8 W 0004861243 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC FOLKSTON 12/12/2011 30-47-23.3 N GA AM KNKQ280 083-13-59.9 W 0004861243 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Lake Park 12/12/2011 30-41-16.2 N GA AM KNKQ280
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311603A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311603A1.txt
      • AM WLL786 122-59-47.3 W 0004961947 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC MARION 12/15/2011 11545.00000 44-46-56.4 N OR AM WLL786 122-59-47.3 W 0004961947 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC MARION 12/15/2011 11585.00000 44-46-56.4 N AZ MD WQOF666 112-13-11.1 W 0004991888 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC Peoria 12/14/2011 23220.00000 33-33-35.2 N AZ MD WQOF666 112-13-11.1 W 0004991888 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC Peoria 12/14/2011 23420.00000 33-33-35.2 N CA MD WQCI703 118-13-01.3 W 0004991948 T-Mobile License LLC Glendale 12/14/2011 19415.00000 34-11-11.0 N CA MD WQCI703 118-13-01.3 W 0004991948 T-Mobile License LLC Glendale 12/14/2011 19440.00000 34-11-11.0 N CA MD WQCH208 118-14-11.2 W 0004991949 T-Mobile License LLC LA CANADA 12/14/2011 17825.00000 34-16-03.9 N CA MD WQCH208 118-14-11.2 W 0004991949 T-Mobile License LLC LA CANADA 12/14/2011 17855.00000 34-16-03.9 N CA MD WQCH208 118-14-11.2 W 0004991949
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311609A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311609A1.txt
      • SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 21575.00000000 Arlington 38-53-50.9 N VA 77-5-17.9 W 3 1 11/11/2011 WQLG503 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 21675.00000000 Arlington 38-53-50.9 N VA 77-5-17.9 W 3 1 11/11/2011 WQLG503 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 22175.00000000 Arlington 38-53-50.9 N VA 77-5-17.9 W 4 1 11/17/2011 WQLJ294 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 19525.00000000 Harrisburg 40-16-17.8 N PA 76-51-1.3 W 2 1 11/14/2011 WQLJ659 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 21925.00000000 St. Louis 38-40-58.3 N MO 90-26-25.4 W 3 1 11/14/2011 WQLJ659 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 22075.00000000 St. Louis 38-40-58.3 N MO 90-26-25.4 W 3 1 11/14/2011 WQLJ677 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 22225.00000000 Maryland Heigh 38-42-13.0 N MO 90-26-7.8 W 3 1 11/17/2011 WQLJ679 FXO
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311726A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311726A1.txt
      • W 0004996438 City of Pullman PULLMAN 12/19/2011 23175.00000 46-45-06.0 N MN NE 095-28-25.4 W 0004996441 Minnesota, State of Garfield 12/19/2011 06541.25000 45-55-33.1 N WA NE 117-09-25.2 W 0004996447 City of Pullman PULLMAN 12/19/2011 21925.00000 46-44-50.3 N WA NE 117-10-35.4 W 0004996449 City of Pullman PULLMAN 12/19/2011 23125.00000 46-44-07.8 N WA NE 117-12-07.6 W 0004996514 City of Pullman Pullman 12/19/2011 21975.00000 46-44-01.3 N WA NE 117-12-43.9 W 0004996517 City of Pullman Pullman 12/19/2011 23075.00000 46-43-39.4 N WA NE 117-11-30.1 W 0004996539 City of Pullman PULLMAN 12/19/2011 23175.00000 46-43-23.9 N WA NE 117-11-23.3 W 0004996550 City of Pullman PULLMAN 12/19/2011 23225.00000 46-43-47.3 N Page 14 MW - Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311729A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311729A1.txt
      • 071-02-04.3 W 0004999981 Towerstream Corp. Boston 12/20/2011 17920.00000 42-24-16.0 N MA NE 071-02-22.4 W 0004999982 Towerstream Corp. Boston 12/20/2011 21625.00000 42-20-52.6 N MA NE 071-04-01.7 W 0004999983 Towerstream Corp. Boston 12/20/2011 22325.00000 42-21-01.8 N MA NE 071-01-20.9 W 0004999984 Towerstream Corp. Boston 12/20/2011 21385.00000 42-20-38.5 N MA NE 071-02-54.9 W 0004999985 Towerstream Corp. Boston 12/20/2011 22225.00000 42-20-57.2 N MA NE 071-03-01.3 W 0004999986 Towerstream Corp. Boston 12/20/2011 22375.00000 42-20-59.9 N MA NE 071-02-14.9 W 0004999987 Towerstream Corp. Boston 12/20/2011 21575.00000 42-21-06.6 N MA NE 071-06-52.3 W 0004999989 Towerstream Corp. Boston 12/20/2011 22775.00000 42-18-13.9 N MA NE 071-13-54.6 W 0004999990 Towerstream Corp. Boston 12/20/2011 22625.00000 42-19-06.2 N MA NE 071-28-45.1 W 0004999991 Towerstream Corp. Boston 12/20/2011 11155.00000 42-17-52.0 N MA NE 071-12-07.2
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.txt
      • Street SW, Room 6-A233 Washington, DC 20554 Ellen.Burton@fcc.gov Cathy Zima, Deputy Division Chief Industry Analysis & Technology Division Wireline Competition Bureau Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street SW, Room 6-A221 Washington, DC 20554 Cathy.Zima@fcc.gov 2010 Table/Chart # StatusTable/Chart #Table/Chart Title Table 1.1 Report Table 1.1 Total Telecommunications Industry Revenues Table 1.2 Report Table 1.2 Telecommunications Industry Revenues by Service Table 1.3 Report Table 1.3 Telecommunications and Interconnected VoIP Revenues Reported by Type of Carrier Table 1.4 Report Table 1.4 Contribution Base Revenues By Program: 2009 Table 1.5 Report Table 1.5 Revenues from Telecommunications and Interconnected VoIP Service Provided for Resale: 2009 Table 1.6 Report Table 1.6 Revenues from Telecommunications and Interconnected VoIP Service Provided to End Users: 2009 Table 1.7 Report
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311914A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311914A1.txt
      • N MI MD KNKN834 083-37-48.0 W 0005019276 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC POSEN 01/06/2012 45-19-06.1 N MI MD KNKN834 083-57-29.0 W 0005019276 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Rogers City 01/06/2012 45-24-52.0 N MI MD KNKN834 083-26-34.4 W 0005019276 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Spruce 01/06/2012 44-51-24.9 N MI MD KNKN834 084-36-04.6 W 0005019276 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC WOLVERINE 01/06/2012 45-21-01.3 N WI MD KNKA763 090-18-24.5 W 0005019294 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC ABBOTSFORD 01/06/2012 44-56-25.2 N WI MD KNKA763 090-04-38.6 W 0005019294 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Athens 01/06/2012 45-04-03.8 N WI MD KNKA763 090-13-14.6 W 0005019294 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Colby 01/06/2012 44-55-13.2 N WI MD KNKA763 089-56-28.6 W 0005019294 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Edgar 01/06/2012 44-47-55.3
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311988A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311988A1.txt
      • Microwave Public Safety Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OR NE 120-10-42.3 W 0005022393 Frontier Telenet Fossil 01/09/2012 19625.00000 45-00-41.0 N OR NE 120-08-15.0 W 0005022440 Frontier Telenet Fossil 01/09/2012 11405.00000 44-53-54.0 N OR NE 118-57-41.5 W 0005022786 Frontier Telenet Canyon City 01/09/2012 23025.00000 44-22-37.8 N OR NE 118-57-01.3 W 0005022827 Frontier Telenet Canyon City 01/09/2012 21825.00000 44-23-14.3 N CA NE 121-56-02.1 W 0005022941 CITY OF SAN JOSE (ECOMM) San Jose 01/09/2012 10785.00000 37-24-04.5 N CA NE 121-55-29.4 W 0005022942 CITY OF SAN JOSE (ECOMM) Los Gatos 01/09/2012 11285.00000 37-13-29.9 N NJ NE 074-03-27.4 W 0005023205 Hudson County Prosecutors Office Jersey City 01/10/2012 11585.00000 40-43-55.9 N NJ NE 074-10-08.0
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311989A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311989A1.txt
      • Transport Management, Inc. St. Paul 01/13/2012 21325.00000 44-57-10.4 N MN MD WQJR640 093-09-00.4 W 0005029819 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. St. Paul 01/13/2012 21425.00000 44-57-10.4 N MN MD WQJR640 093-09-00.4 W 0005029819 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. St. Paul 01/13/2012 21525.00000 44-57-10.4 N MN MD WQJR640 093-09-00.4 W 0005029819 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. St. Paul 01/13/2012 22320.00000 44-57-10.4 N MN MD WQKG659 093-08-01.3 W 0005029826 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. St. Paul 01/13/2012 23520.00000 44-56-24.0 N MN MD WQJS435 092-58-55.0 W 0005030139 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Cannon Falls 01/13/2012 11665.00000 44-35-35.3 N MN MD WQJC535 093-01-37.9 W 0005030210 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. St. Paul 01/13/2012 21275.00000 44-59-21.8 N Page 14 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312140A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312140A1.txt
      • N PA MD WQOP518 077-58-27.0 W 0005033982 Newgig Networks, LLC Julian 01/18/2012 06226.89000 40-55-11.2 N PA MD WQOP518 077-58-27.0 W 0005033982 Newgig Networks, LLC Julian 01/18/2012 06404.79000 40-55-11.2 N PA MD WQOP518 077-58-27.0 W 0005033982 Newgig Networks, LLC Julian 01/18/2012 11215.00000 40-55-11.2 N PA MD WQOP518 077-58-27.0 W 0005033982 Newgig Networks, LLC Julian 01/18/2012 11565.00000 40-55-11.2 N PA MD WQOP520 078-32-01.3 W 0005033983 Newgig Networks, LLC Penfield 01/18/2012 06256.54000 41-05-59.4 N PA MD WQOP520 078-32-01.3 W 0005033983 Newgig Networks, LLC Penfield 01/18/2012 06286.19000 41-05-59.4 N PA MD WQOP520 078-32-01.3 W 0005033983 Newgig Networks, LLC Penfield 01/18/2012 10955.00000 41-05-59.4 N PA MD WQOP520 078-32-01.3 W 0005033983 Newgig Networks, LLC Penfield 01/18/2012 11035.00000 41-05-59.4 N PA MD WQOP520 078-32-01.3 W 0005033983 Newgig Networks,
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312218A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312218A1.txt
      • SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 17915.00000000 HAMPDEN TOW 40-16-2.6 N PA 76-58-27.9 W 4 1 12/28/2011 WQLI894 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 17815.00000000 HAMPDEN TOW 40-16-2.6 N PA 76-58-27.9 W 5 1 12/28/2011 WQLI894 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 17915.00000000 HAMPDEN TOW 40-16-2.6 N PA 76-58-27.9 W 5 1 12/25/2011 WQLJ284 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 19575.00000000 Hampden 40-14-1.3 N PA 76-58-7.0 W 4 1 12/25/2011 WQLJ284 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 19675.00000000 Hampden 40-14-1.3 N PA 76-58-7.0 W 4 1 12/25/2011 WQLJ284 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 21925.00000000 Hampden 40-14-1.3 N PA 76-58-7.0 W 5 1 12/25/2011 WQLJ284 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 22025.00000000 Hampden 40-14-1.3 N PA 76-58-7.0 W 5 1 12/28/2011 WQLJ420 FXO
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312324A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312324A1.txt
      • Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MN MD WQIW801 093-27-25.0 W 0005060292 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Plymouth 02/03/2012 21420.00000 44-59-11.0 N MN MD WQIL603 093-35-05.0 W 0005060306 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Long Lake 02/03/2012 11265.00000 44-59-11.0 N MN MD WQJZ987 093-31-25.3 W 0005060309 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Corcoran 02/03/2012 17960.00000 45-05-01.3 N MN MD WQJZ987 093-31-25.3 W 0005060309 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Corcoran 02/03/2012 18080.00000 45-05-01.3 N MN MD WQJM989 093-28-41.0 W 0005060312 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. PLYMOUTH 02/03/2012 19440.00000 44-59-33.0 N MN MD WQIL597 093-27-29.2 W 0005060409 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Plymouth 02/03/2012 17880.00000 45-00-51.5 N MN MD WQIL597 093-27-29.2 W 0005060409 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Plymouth 02/03/2012 22620.00000 45-00-51.5
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312336A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312336A1.txt
      • Division 01/01/2012 WQCC526 FXO Business Only Broadband, LLC 17915.00000000 Chicago 41-52-54.0 N IL 87-38-51.0 W 3 1 Call Sign Termination Date Stn Class Licensee Name Lower/Upper Frequency City Latitude State Longitude Loc./ Path ## Ant. IG - Industrial/Business Pool, Conventional Mobility Division 01/03/2012 WPRI761 MO Griffith Energy LLC 466.32500000 -- -- 5 1 12/30/2011 WQEW583 MO Wilmington Hospital 72.14000000 Wilmington 39-45-1.3 N DE 75-33-2.3 W 2 1 12/30/2011 WQEW583 MO Wilmington Hospital 72.28000000 Wilmington 39-45-1.3 N DE 75-33-2.3 W 2 1 12/30/2011 WQEW583 MO Wilmington Hospital 72.36000000 Wilmington 39-45-1.3 N DE 75-33-2.3 W 2 1 12/30/2011 WQEW583 MO Wilmington Hospital 72.40000000 Wilmington 39-45-1.3 N DE 75-33-2.3 W 2 1 01/03/2012 WQND744 MO CAR POOL LLC 451.53750000 MECHANICSV 37-36-37.7 N VA 77-20-41.5
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312417A1.pdf
      • that the USF remains sustainable over time. (3) Promote and advance universal service by increasing the number of USF enforcement actions. Promote and advance universal service by reviewing 100% of referrals from the Commission's Office of Inspector General and taking enforcement action where appropriate in cases of non- compliance. Report at least annually on USF enforcement actions. Outcome-oriented Performance Goal 1.3: Enable the private sector to accelerate the deployment and expansion of broadband networks by minimizing regulatory and other barriers to broadband build out. Targets with Subordinate Measures: (1) Employ strategies to encourage investment in networks and services by existing providers, while encouraging participation in broadband markets by new and non-traditional participants. Initiate or adopt rulemaking actions that provide opportunities for
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312456A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312456A1.txt
      • 0005068655 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Bitely 02/09/2012 43-43-56.7 N MI MD KNKA552 086-10-10.2 W 0005068655 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Fruitport 02/09/2012 43-08-58.0 N Page 26 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MI MD KNKA552 086-22-59.4 W 0005068655 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Hart 02/09/2012 43-45-01.3 N MI MD KNKA552 086-22-46.4 W 0005068655 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC HART 02/09/2012 43-39-42.7 N MI MD KNKA552 086-04-56.6 W 0005068655 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Holton 02/09/2012 43-24-14.6 N MI MD KNKA552 086-22-17.0 W 0005068655 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC MONTAGUE 02/09/2012 43-24-25.7 N MI MD KNKA552 086-12-26.3 W 0005068655 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Muskegon 02/09/2012 43-12-35.5
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312457A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312457A1.txt
      • Wireless (VAW) LLC TWISP 02/09/2012 48-19-02.5 N SD MD KNKA648 103-23-33.5 W 0005068924 Cellular, Inc. Financial Corporation PIEDMONT 02/09/2012 44-16-00.4 N SD MD KNKA648 103-30-48.0 W 0005068924 Cellular, Inc. Financial Corporation RAPID CITY 02/09/2012 44-25-25.0 N KS MD KNKN772 100-37-52.5 W 0005069195 Alltel Communications, LLC COPELAND 02/10/2012 37-33-09.3 N KS MD KNKN772 101-54-31.3 W 0005069195 Alltel Communications, LLC ELKHART 02/10/2012 37-00-01.3 N KS MD KNKN801 099-59-57.0 W 0005069254 Alltel Communications, LLC ASHLAND 02/10/2012 37-12-56.0 N KS MD KNKN801 100-37-52.5 W 0005069254 Alltel Communications, LLC COPELAND 02/10/2012 37-33-09.3 N ID MD KNKN234 111-26-39.0 W 0005069434 Idaho 6-Clark Limited Partnership Mack's Inn 02/10/2012 44-33-46.0 N ID MD KNKN234 111-20-41.8 W 0005069434 Idaho 6-Clark Limited Partnership VICTOR 02/10/2012 43-42-22.7 N VA MD KNKN714 079-35-46.0
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312574A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312574A1.txt
      • 18115.00000 18-09-58.7 N PR MD WQCY437 065-59-30.6 W 0005072689 SprintCom, Inc. Trujillo Alto 02/13/2012 19605.00000 18-22-19.0 N PR MD WQCY437 065-59-30.6 W 0005072689 SprintCom, Inc. Trujillo Alto 02/13/2012 19625.00000 18-22-19.0 N PR MD WQAK509 066-16-25.6 W 0005072691 SprintCom, Inc. Dorado 02/13/2012 18065.00000 18-28-38.8 N PR MD WQAK509 066-16-25.6 W 0005072691 SprintCom, Inc. Dorado 02/13/2012 21975.00000 18-28-38.8 N PR MD WQAK510 066-08-01.3 W 0005072692 SprintCom, Inc. Bayamon 02/13/2012 17925.00000 18-23-50.3 N PR MD WQAK510 066-08-01.3 W 0005072692 SprintCom, Inc. Bayamon 02/13/2012 23075.00000 18-23-50.3 N Page 15 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City PR MD WQBM452 066-09-46.5 W 0005072693 SprintCom, Inc. Bayamon 02/13/2012
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312576A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312576A1.txt
      • 123-08-34.0 W 0005078699 Cellco Partnership Hopland 02/16/2012 05945.20000 38-55-53.6 N CA MD WPZC391 123-08-34.0 W 0005078699 Cellco Partnership Hopland 02/16/2012 06605.00000 38-55-53.6 N CA MD WPZC391 123-08-34.0 W 0005078699 Cellco Partnership Hopland 02/16/2012 10563.12500 38-55-53.6 N CA MD WPZC391 123-08-34.0 W 0005078699 Cellco Partnership Hopland 02/16/2012 11325.00000 38-55-53.6 N CA MD WPZE306 123-14-00.2 W 0005078704 Cellco Partnership UKIAH 02/16/2012 06197.24000 39-07-01.3 N CA MD WPZE306 123-14-00.2 W 0005078704 Cellco Partnership UKIAH 02/16/2012 06765.00000 39-07-01.3 N CA MD WPZE306 123-14-00.2 W 0005078704 Cellco Partnership UKIAH 02/16/2012 10567.50000 39-07-01.3 N NV MD WMM888 119-27-50.9 W 0005078859 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCWADSWORTH 02/16/2012 06765.00000 39-39-06.3 N NV MD WMM888 119-27-50.9 W 0005078859 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCWADSWORTH 02/16/2012 10755.00000 39-39-06.3 N TX MD WQOF717
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312690A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312690A1.txt
      • N CA NE 119-52-26.8 W 0005086172 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Lemoore Station 02/21/2012 10627.50000 36-16-09.5 N TX NE 097-44-29.0 W 0005086482 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Austin 02/22/2012 18085.00000 30-15-39.8 N TX NE 095-32-00.3 W 0005086483 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Powderly 02/22/2012 10755.00000 33-46-53.6 N TX NE 097-43-54.8 W 0005086959 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Austin 02/22/2012 19645.00000 30-15-52.7 N MS NE 089-08-01.3 W 0005087416 Cellular South Licenses, LLC Ellisville 02/22/2012 05945.20000 31-31-51.5 N MS NE 089-08-01.3 W 0005087416 Cellular South Licenses, LLC Ellisville 02/22/2012 05974.85000 31-31-51.5 N Page 24 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MS NE 089-08-01.3 W 0005087416 Cellular South
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312691A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312691A1.txt
      • Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MO AM 094-34-45.8 W 0005042006 Computers & Tele-Comm, Inc. (CTC) Kansas City 02/23/2012 10795.00000 39-05-06.6 N MO AM 094-34-45.8 W 0005042006 Computers & Tele-Comm, Inc. (CTC) Kansas City 02/23/2012 19460.00000 39-05-06.6 N CA MD WQLQ584 118-02-12.0 W 0005087576 Nextweb, Inc Whitter 02/22/2012 23170.00000 33-59-53.0 N NY MD WQLW376 073-55-01.3 W 0005089166 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIINew York 02/23/2012 23175.00000 40-52-08.4 N NY MD WQLW376 073-55-01.3 W 0005089166 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIINew York 02/23/2012 23275.00000 40-52-08.4 N NY MD WQLW376 073-55-01.3 W 0005089166 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIINew York 02/23/2012 23325.00000 40-52-08.4 N NY MD WQLW376 073-55-01.3 W 0005089166 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIINew York 02/23/2012 23375.00000 40-52-08.4 N NY MD WQLW376 073-55-01.3
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312788A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312788A1.txt
      • W 0005091518 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIChicago 02/24/2012 19375.00000 41-41-31.3 N Page 28 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City IL MD WQKM704 087-38-55.0 W 0005091518 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIChicago 02/24/2012 19475.00000 41-41-31.3 N IL MD WQMY805 088-12-15.3 W 0005091519 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIPlainfield 02/24/2012 21825.00000 41-36-01.3 N IL MD WQMY805 088-12-15.3 W 0005091519 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIPlainfield 02/24/2012 21975.00000 41-36-01.3 N IL MD WQMY805 088-12-15.3 W 0005091519 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIPlainfield 02/24/2012 22125.00000 41-36-01.3 N IL MD WQMY805 088-12-15.3 W 0005091519 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIPlainfield 02/24/2012 22225.00000 41-36-01.3 N IL MD WQMY805 088-12-15.3 W 0005091519 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIPlainfield 02/24/2012 22275.00000 41-36-01.3 N IL MD WQKM746
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312789A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312789A1.txt
      • Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NJ MD WQLT441 074-16-46.3 W 0005095989 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIKenilworth 02/28/2012 23025.00000 40-40-24.8 N NJ MD WQLT441 074-16-46.3 W 0005095989 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIKenilworth 02/28/2012 23175.00000 40-40-24.8 N NJ MD WQLT606 074-20-00.3 W 0005095990 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIMountainside 02/28/2012 11225.00000 40-41-01.3 N NJ MD WQLT606 074-20-00.3 W 0005095990 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIMountainside 02/28/2012 11265.00000 40-41-01.3 N NJ MD WQLT606 074-20-00.3 W 0005095990 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIMountainside 02/28/2012 11345.00000 40-41-01.3 N NJ MD WQLT606 074-20-00.3 W 0005095990 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIMountainside 02/28/2012 11425.00000 40-41-01.3 N NJ MD WQLT606 074-20-00.3 W 0005095990 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIMountainside 02/28/2012 11465.00000 40-41-01.3 N NJ MD WQLT606
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312802A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312802A1.txt
      • 1 Page 19 Frequency Termination Pending Call Sign Termination Date Stn Class Licensee Name Lower/Upper Frequency City Latitude State Longitude Loc./ Path ## Ant. MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool Broadband Division 01/28/2012 WQMF919 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 22075.00000000 Arden-Arcade 38-35-57.9 N CA 121-24-52.5 W2 1 01/28/2012 WQMF922 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 19675.00000000 Folsom 38-38-36.9 N CA 121-10-1.3 W 1 1 01/28/2012 WQMF922 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 19475.00000000 Folsom 38-38-36.9 N CA 121-10-1.3 W 2 1 01/28/2012 WQMF922 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 23125.00000000 Folsom 38-38-36.9 N CA 121-10-1.3 W 3 1 01/28/2012 WQMF922 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 23275.00000000 Folsom 38-38-36.9 N CA 121-10-1.3 W 3 1 01/28/2012 WQMF922 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312929A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312929A1.txt
      • Jordan 03/06/2012 47-18-24.6 N MT MD KNKR256 107-29-16.0 W 0005106138 WWC HOLDING CO., INC. Malta 03/06/2012 48-23-41.0 N FL MD KNKA598 081-36-53.8 W 0005106949 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCALVA 03/07/2012 26-43-29.0 N FL MD KNKA598 082-15-38.9 W 0005106949 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCBoca Grand 03/07/2012 26-45-00.9 N FL MD KNKA598 081-47-12.3 W 0005106949 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCBonita Springs 03/07/2012 26-19-01.3 N FL MD KNKA598 082-01-31.0 W 0005106949 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCCape Coral 03/07/2012 26-38-25.0 N FL MD KNKA598 082-11-42.5 W 0005106949 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCCaptiva 03/07/2012 26-32-30.2 N FL MD KNKA598 081-37-48.0 W 0005106949 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCESTERO 03/07/2012 26-25-23.0 N FL MD KNKA598 081-33-53.6 W 0005106949 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCFELDA 03/07/2012 26-35-59.7 N FL MD
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312930A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312930A1.txt
      • Mantachie 03/08/2012 10995.00000 34-19-02.9 N MS NE 089-08-50.1 W 0005108713 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC Myrtle 03/08/2012 11365.00000 34-33-31.5 N MS NE 089-01-59.6 W 0005108714 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC New Albany 03/08/2012 10875.00000 34-28-47.9 N TN NE 088-45-53.6 W 0005108715 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC Milan 03/08/2012 10875.00000 35-56-43.1 N AR NE 093-00-42.6 W 0005108716 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC Harrison 03/08/2012 10875.00000 36-18-01.3 N AR NE 093-44-09.0 W 0005108717 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC NASHVILLE 03/08/2012 11245.00000 33-53-12.0 N AR NE 090-32-56.0 W 0005108718 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC PARAGOULD 03/08/2012 11325.00000 36-06-03.0 N AR NE 090-30-06.4 W 0005108719 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC Paragould 03/08/2012 10835.00000 36-03-06.1 N MS NE 088-27-04.0 W 0005108720 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC TUPELO 03/08/2012 11325.00000 34-16-16.0 N OK NE 096-39-50.0
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312932A1.txt
      • Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City CA NE 119-42-24.3 W 0005109313 KINGS COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATIOArmona 03/08/2012 23175.00000 36-18-43.4 N CA NE 119-42-39.5 W 0005109414 KINGS COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATIOHanford 03/08/2012 21875.00000 36-20-50.9 N CA NE 119-42-39.5 W 0005109414 KINGS COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATIOHanford 03/08/2012 21975.00000 36-20-50.9 N CA NE 119-40-01.3 W 0005109492 KINGS COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATIOHanford 03/08/2012 19425.00000 36-19-58.5 N CA NE 119-40-01.3 W 0005109492 KINGS COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATIOHanford 03/08/2012 19625.00000 36-19-58.5 N CA NE 119-46-47.1 W 0005110112 KINGS COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATIOLemoore 03/08/2012 18015.00000 36-14-39.1 N CA NE 119-46-47.1 W 0005110112 KINGS COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATIOLemoore 03/08/2012 18115.00000 36-14-39.1 N CA NE 119-49-15.1 W 0005110133 KINGS COUNTY
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313091A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313091A1.txt
      • Wireless PCS, LLC Bluefield 03/12/2012 19375.00000 37-15-30.0 N WV NE 081-11-24.7 W 0005114375 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Bluefield 03/12/2012 10755.00000 37-15-51.9 N VA NE 081-16-11.7 W 0005114385 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC BLUEFIELD 03/12/2012 17815.00000 37-14-48.9 N MA NE 071-29-20.7 W 0005114445 Towerstream Corp. Boston 03/12/2012 11035.00000 42-17-45.9 N MA NE 071-03-33.2 W 0005114447 Towerstream Corp. Boston 03/12/2012 22725.00000 42-21-01.3 N MA NE 071-03-31.6 W 0005114448 Towerstream Corp. Boston 03/12/2012 23175.00000 42-21-57.5 N MA NE 071-04-20.0 W 0005114449 Towerstream Corp. BOSTON 03/12/2012 22275.00000 42-20-55.4 N MA NE 070-55-36.1 W 0005114450 Towerstream Corp. Boston 03/12/2012 10815.00000 41-38-15.4 N MA NE 071-03-53.1 W 0005114451 Towerstream Corp. Boston 03/12/2012 23125.00000 42-20-51.7 N Page 12 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313110A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313110A1.txt
      • 1 1 02/14/2012 WPWW857 MO LAYMAN WHOLESALE NURSERIES INC 463.62500000 TRENTON 33-44-27.0 N SC 81-50-25.0 W 1 1 02/14/2012 WPWW857 MO LAYMAN WHOLESALE NURSERIES INC 463.82500000 TRENTON 33-44-27.0 N SC 81-50-25.0 W 1 1 02/14/2012 WPWW857 MO LAYMAN WHOLESALE NURSERIES INC 464.62500000 TRENTON 33-44-27.0 N SC 81-50-25.0 W 1 1 02/15/2012 WPZA438 FB Springfield Water and Sewer Commission 153.30500000 Granville 42-7-1.3 N MA 72-51-51.4 W 1 1 Page 8 Frequency Termination Pending Call Sign Termination Date Stn Class Licensee Name Lower/Upper Frequency City Latitude State Longitude Loc./ Path ## Ant. IG - Industrial/Business Pool, Conventional Mobility Division 02/15/2012 WPZA438 MO Springfield Water and Sewer Commission 153.30500000 -- -- 2 1 Call Sign Termination Date Stn Class Licensee Name Lower/Upper Frequency City
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313254A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313254A1.txt
      • New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC BEAVER ISLAND 03/23/2012 45-44-47.4 N MI MD KNKN656 085-17-42.0 W 0005131507 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Central Lake 03/23/2012 45-05-30.0 N MI MD KNKN656 085-19-16.0 W 0005131507 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC CHARLEVOIX 03/23/2012 45-13-32.0 N MI MD KNKN656 085-00-19.4 W 0005131507 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC CROSS VILLAGE 03/23/2012 45-37-51.6 N MI MD KNKN656 084-54-01.3 W 0005131507 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Elmira 03/23/2012 44-58-20.6 N MI MD KNKN656 084-41-29.6 W 0005131507 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC GRAYLING 03/23/2012 44-34-15.4 N MI MD KNKN656 085-01-48.9 W 0005131507 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC HARBOR SPRINGS 03/23/2012 45-30-05.2 N MI MD KNKN656 084-52-57.2 W 0005131507 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC KALKASKA 03/23/2012 44-42-25.5 N MI MD KNKN656
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313286A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313286A2.txt
      • 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $1,891,134 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 99.8 396,761,258 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.7 99.2 Italy $32,470,005 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.3 96.7 $8,131,637 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $39,099,750 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 818,950,600 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.3 94.7 Liechtenstein $2,064,776 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.4 99.3 $772 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $7,471 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 98.2 7,661,264 0.0 0.0 1.1 1.3 97.5 Luxembourg $1,510,384 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 99.1 $366,390 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $6,104,760 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 57,007,671 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 99.1 Malta $830,676 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.3 97.7 $37,334 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $1,60316.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 83.1 6,915,471 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.5 92.5 Netherlands $23,424,030 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 99.6 $1,594,086 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $12,116,320
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313398A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313398A1.txt
      • 03/26/2012 03650.00000 - 03700.00000 NE 0005135633 Bascule Concepts LLC 03/27/2012 03650.00000 - 03700.00000 NE WQPB460 0005137038 Coles Moultrie Electric Cooperative 03/27/2012 03650.00000 - 03700.00000 TI - TV Intercity Relay State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NH MD WDT46 071-35-23.2 W 0005136038 HEARST PROPERTIES INC. GOFFSTOWN 03/27/2012 06975.00000 - 07000.00000 42-59-01.3 N NH MD WLF658 071-35-23.2 W 0005136179 HEARST PROPERTIES INC. GOFFSTOWN 03/27/2012 07025.00000 - 07050.00000 42-59-01.3 N NH MD WLF709 071-35-23.2 W 0005136195 HEARST PROPERTIES INC. GOFFSTOWN 03/27/2012 07100.00000 - 07125.00000 42-59-01.3 N TP - TV Pickup State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City IL MD KC26213 P 087-38-10.1 W
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313405A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313405A1.txt
      • HOLDINGS III, LLC 23125.00000000 Los Angeles 34-11-13.5 N CA 118-24-46.8 W4 1 02/25/2012 WQMB703 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 17965.00000000 Los Angeles 34-11-13.5 N CA 118-24-46.8 W5 1 02/25/2012 WQMB703 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 18065.00000000 Los Angeles 34-11-13.5 N CA 118-24-46.8 W5 1 02/26/2012 WQMC257 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 23125.00000000 Los Angeles 34-3-10.4 N CA 118-17-1.3 W 2 1 Page 6 Frequency Termination Pending Call Sign Termination Date Stn Class Licensee Name Lower/Upper Frequency City Latitude State Longitude Loc./ Path ## Ant. MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool Broadband Division 02/26/2012 WQMC257 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 23275.00000000 Los Angeles 34-3-10.4 N CA 118-17-1.3 W 2 1 02/24/2012 WQMJ559 FXO CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS III, LLC 19375.00000000
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313615A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313615A1.txt
      • 35-41-24.3 N TX AM KNKN425 101-58-21.2 W 0004958733 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Dumas 04/13/2012 35-50-53.9 N TX AM KNKN425 102-09-42.6 W 0004958733 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Dumas 04/13/2012 35-52-04.4 N TX AM KNKN425 101-48-39.4 W 0004958733 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Dumas 04/13/2012 35-52-44.2 N TX AM KNKN425 101-58-42.5 W 0004958733 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC DUMAS 04/13/2012 35-53-01.3 N Page 28 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NM AM KNKN425 103-02-47.6 W 0004958733 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Glen Rio 04/13/2012 35-10-14.8 N TX AM KNKN425 102-23-00.2 W 0004958733 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC HARTLEY 04/13/2012 35-51-47.0 N TX AM KNKN425 102-48-59.7 W 0004958733
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313951A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313951A1.txt
      • State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City KS AM KNKN518 100-33-25.5 W 0004992420 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC CHARLESTON 04/30/2012 37-52-26.0 N KS AM KNKN518 100-33-34.2 W 0004992420 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Copeland 04/30/2012 37-33-23.3 N KS AM KNKN518 101-54-31.3 W 0004992420 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC ELKHART 04/30/2012 37-00-01.3 N KS AM KNKN518 100-54-45.8 W 0004992420 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Friend 04/30/2012 38-15-52.8 N KS AM KNKN518 100-50-13.6 W 0004992420 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Garden City 04/30/2012 37-59-31.1 N KS AM KNKN518 101-19-57.0 W 0004992420 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Hugoton 04/30/2012 37-11-34.0 N KS AM KNKN518 101-49-05.0 W 0004992420 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC JOHNSON 04/30/2012
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-138A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-138A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-138A1.txt
      • to investigate whether further enforcement action is warranted against Defendants for apparent knowing or repeated violations of Commission rules in relation to the facts raised in these complaint proceedings. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 201(b), 203(c), and 208 of the Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 154(j), 201(b), 203(c), 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.106 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 1.106, that the Application for Review of the Bell Atlantic Order filed by Frontier Communications Services, Inc. IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 201(b), 203(c), and 208 of the Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 154(j), 201(b), 203(c), 208, and
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-163A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-163A1.pdf
      • center frequency. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories (LLNL) expects that UWB devices will operate with a center frequency anywhere between 20 MHz and 60 GHz, with bandwidths ranging from 150 MHz to 30 GHz. Multi Spectral Solutions, Inc. (MSSI) indicates that it has developed systems for the U.S. Government operating in the bands 30 - 50 MHz, 225 - 400 MHz, 1.3 - 1.7 GHz, 2.2 -2.7 GHz, 5.4 - 5.9 GHz and 9.0 - 11.0 GHz using bandwidths from 20 MHz to 2 GHz. Time Domain provides a table of potential UWB applications and the frequency ranges in which they are likely to operate. In this table, Time Domain suggests that GPRs and long range military communications will tend to operate
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-166A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-166A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-166A1.txt
      • request makes Comsat's argument unconvincing. IV. Conclusion and Ordering Clauses For the foregoing reasons, we conclude that good cause has been shown and the public interest is served by granting BTNA a waiver of the Commission's direct access dominant foreign Signatory restriction. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that the petition for waiver filed by BT North America Inc., pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that this Order is effective on release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Magalie Roman Salas Secretary In the Matter of Direct Access to the INTELSAT System, Report and Order, FCC 99-236, 14 FCC Rcd 15703 (1999) (``Direct Access decision''). The Open Market Reorganization for the Betterment of International
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-183A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-183A1.txt
      • the circuit that the requesting carrier seeks to convert terminate at a single collocation arrangement in the incumbent LEC's network.71 66 Letter from Susanne A. Guyer, Assistant Vice President, Federal Regulatory, Bell Atlantic, to Magalie Roman Salas, Secretary, FCC, CC Docket No. 96-98, Attachment at 2 (filed Apr. 11, 2000) (Bell Atlantic Apr. 11, 2000 Letter). 67 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. 68 Third Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3912, para. 486 69 Supplemental Order at n.9. 70 See Third Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3831, para. 298. 71 See February 28, 2000 Joint Letter at 2 (stating in options 1 and 2 that "the loop/transport combination originates at a customer's premises and terminates at the telecommunications carrier's
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-190A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-190A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-190A1.txt
      • Application for Review at 13. Ordinarily, we do not consider questions of law or fact on application for review that are not first presented to the bureau or office that rendered the initial decision. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.115(c). However, we have waived this rule in the past where doing so was in the public interest. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (Commission may waive its rules for good cause); Sperzel v. NEC Telephone, Inc., 86 FCC 2d 97, 100 � 9 (1981) (waiver of section 1.115(c) and consideration of issue not presented to the designated authority was in the public interest); Silverman v. KOOL-TV, 63 FCC 2d 507, 507 n.1 (1977) (pursuant to section 1.3, waiver of section 1.115(c) was in
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-202A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-202A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-202A1.txt
      • 9 (1995) (entity to purchase discount airline tickets on behalf of a group of corporations); IFA Shippers' Ass'n, 1990 DOJBRL LEXIS 2 (1990) (shippers form group to purchase volume discounts from ocean carriers); Utilities Service Alliance, 1996 DOJBRL LEXIS 4 (1996) (electric power utilities form alliance to purchase resources). Applicants Dec. 21 Ownership Reply Comments at 35. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co., LP v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1165 (D.C. Cir. 1990); United States v. Storer Broadcasting Co., 351 U.S. 192, 205 (1956). WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972). Attribution Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 19029-19031 �� 33-37 (rejecting commenters' ``day-to-day control'' arguments). See Letter from Mark
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-221A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-221A1.txt
      • between regulated and nonregulated affiliates on their books of account, and thereby help ensure that such transactions occur at arm's length. See 47 C.F.R. � 32.27. See Implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996: Accounting Safeguards Under the Telecommunications Act of 1996, CC Docket 96-150, Second Order on Reconsideration, FCC 00-9 (rel. Jan. 18, 2000). 241 See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 32.18; see also Aliant Communications Co. Petition for Waiver of Section 32.27 of the Commission's Rules, Order on Reconsideration, 14 FCC Rcd 6231 (1999); Puerto Rico Telephone Co. Petition for Waiver of Section 32.27 of the Commission's Rules, Memorandum Opinion and Order, DA 99-2233 (rel. Nov. 5, 1999). 242 See AT&T May 5, 2000 Opposition at 7 & n.4. Federal
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-287A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-287A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-287A1.txt
      • been successfully placed into orbit and the operations conform to the terms and conditions of this authorization. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Intelsat LLC requests for waiver of Sections 25.140(b), 25.202(a)(1), 25.202(g), 25.210(a)(1)&(3), 25.210(c), 25.210(i), 25.211(a), 25.210(j)(1), and 25.210(g)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 25.140(b), 25.202(a)(1), 25.202(g), 25.210(a), 25.210(c), 25.210(i), 25.211(a), 25.210(j)(1), and 25.210(g)(1), pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, ARE GRANTED as provided in this Order for the satellites as specifically indicated in Appendix C. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Intelsat LLC requests for waiver of Section 25.140(f) of our Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 25.140(f), pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, ARE GRANTED, as
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-289A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-289A1.txt
      • percent of the total U.S. population, have three or more different operators (cellular, PCS, and/or Nextel) offering mobile telephone service in the counties in which they live. However, these counties make up only 35 percent of the total land area of the United States, reflecting the nation's uneven population distribution. On the other hand, the land area of these counties, 1.3 million square miles, is roughly equal to the combined land area of the 15 members of the European Union. Over 173 million people, or 69 percent of the U.S. population, live in areas with five or more mobile telephone operators competing to offer service. And 11 million people, or 4 percent of the population, can choose from among seven different
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-326A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-326A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-326A1.txt
      • Reply Comments at 3; PCIA Comments at 6. NENA Reply Comments at 4, 5; APCO Reply Comments at 1, 2. E911 Third Report and Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 17425. Id. See VoiceStream June 15 Ex Parte Comments at 15, indicating that hybrid E-OTD technology can eventually achieve the same 50-meter accuracy level required for handset-based solutions. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) citing WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969). See E911 First Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 18710, 18718. We emphasize that the filing of a waiver request does not and will not excuse noncompliance with our E911 rules. Moreover, carriers are
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-348A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-348A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-348A1.txt
      • Public Safety Band-Spectrum & Channels Designated Purpose Amount of Spectrum Narrowband (6.25 kHz) Wideband (50 kHz) General Use 12.5 MHz (52.1 %) 7.7 MHz (1232 channels) 4.8 MHz (96 channels) Interoperability 2.6 MHz (10.8 %) 0.8 MHz (128 channels) 1.8 MHz (36 channels) State License 2.4 MHz (10.0 %) 2.4 MHz (384 channels) - 0 - Low Power 0.3 MHz (1.3 %) 0.3 MHz (48 channels) - 0 - Reserve 6.2 MHz (25.8 %) 0.8 MHz (128 channels) 5.4 MHz ( 108 channels) T O T A L 24 MHz (100 %) 12 MHz (1920 channels) 12 MHz (240 channels) GNSS Protection Criteria We adopt technical solutions to protect certain global navigation satellite systems (GNSS), particularly the Global Orbiting Navigation Satellite
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-366A1_Erratum.pdf
      • ofothercarrierstotheowners'propertiesordiscriminatingagainstthefacilitiesofothercarrierssuchas [competitiveLECs]."OrderInstitutingRulemakingontheCommission'sOwnMotionintoCompetitionjorLocal Exch"angeService,1998WL1109255,SlipGp.at48(Cal.P.u.e.Oct22,1998). 91 See47U.S.e. �208. 92 Wenotethathotels,orsimilarestablishments,arenotcoveredbytheprohibitionagainstexclusivecontracts becausehotelguestsarenot"tenants"withinthemeaningofourrules.Atthesametime,totheextentthatahotel itselfisatenantinacommercialbuilding,ourprohibitionagainstexclusivecontractswouldapply.Thus,a telecommunicationscarrierprovidingserviceinanMTEthatincludesahotelasoneofitstenantswouldbe prohibitedfromenteringintoanexclusivecontract. 93 See,e.g.,NebraskaMDUOrderat6;Conn.Gen.Stat.Ann. �16-2471(1997);MassachusettsNondiscriminatory AccessOrderat30;16Tex.Admin.Code �26.129(Sept.7,2000). 94 Forexample,Massachusettspermitsaserviceproviderorpropertyownertorebutthepresumptionthatan exclusivecontractisanticompetitivebyshowingthatthecontractbenefitstenantsandisthereforeinthepublic (continued....) 23001 FederalCommunicationsCommission FCC00-366 conflictedwithourrulesonexclusivecontractswouldpotentiallybesubjecttopreemption,wedonot believeasapracticalmatterthissituationwillariseveryoften.However,totheextentanystate'slawis allegedtodirectlyconflictwithourrules,wewillconsidertheallegedconflictifnecessaryonacase-by- casebasis. 40.Also,wenotethatourruleisnotintendedtopreventapremisesownerfromenteringintoan exclusivecontractwhenitisa::tingasapurchaseroftelecommunicationsserviceonbehalfofits affiliatedentities,suchassubsidiaryunits,oremployees.Forexample,werecognizethatcertainstate governmentsdevelopandadministerexclusivecontractsforthepublicagenciesorofficesundertheir jurisdiction.Similarly,acollegeoruniversitymayenterintoanexclusivecontractonbehalfofits affiliatedschools,departments,faculty,andstafe5Giventhatthepurposeofourprohibitionon exclusivecontractsistoensureconsumerchoice,itwouldnotbeconsistentwiththispurposetorestrict exclusivearrangementswithpropertyownersthatareaffiliatedinthismannerwiththeirtenant consumers,andwethereforedonotreachsucharrangements. C. AccesstoWiring 41.Inthissection,wetakethefollowingactionsregardingthedemarcationpointthatmarksthe divisionbetweentelecommunicationsnetworkwiringunderLECcontrolandwiringunderbuilding owner/endusercontrol:(1)clarifYthattheCommission'sdemarcationpointrules,includingthe revisionsadoptedinthissection,governthecontrolofinsidewiringandrelatedfacilitiesforpurposesof competitiveaccess,aswellasthecontrolofthesefacilitiesforpurposesofinstallationandmaintenance; (2)establishprocedurestofacilitatetherelocationofthedemarcationpointtotheMPOEatthebuilding owner'srequestinMTEs;(3)requireLECstodisclosethelocationofthedemarcationpointwhereitis notlocatedattheMPOE;and(4)resolvependingissuesintheCommission'sdemarcationpoint proceedinginCCDocket88-57. Webelievethattheseactionswillfacilitateaccessto telecommunicationsinsidewiringbycompetitiveprovidersoflocaltelecommunicationsservices.96In addition,wedeclinetorequireauniformrelocationofthedemarcationpointtotheMPOEforthe reasonsdiscussedbelow. 1. Background 42.IntheCompetitiveNetworksNPRM,werequestedcommentonhowourrulesgoverningthe locationofthedemarcationpointbetweenfacilitiescontrolledbythelocaltelephonecarrierandthe (Continuedfrompreviouspage)-------------- interest,consideringsuchfactorsasthedurationofthecontract,thecontractingprovider'sstatusasanewentrant, theeffectoftheexclusivecontractonthedevelopmentofcompetitionandnewtechnology,andefficiencybenefits. MassachusettsNondiscriminatoryAccessOrderat30.Similarly,ourregulationspermitthewaiverofanyprovision ofourrulesforgoodcauseshown.See47C.F.R.�1.3(rulesmaybesuspended,revoked,amended,orwaivedfor goodcauseshown).Thus,inordertocomplywithboththeMassachusettsandthefederalregulations,aprovider seekingtoenterintoanexclusivecontractmustbothmaketherequiredpublicinterestshowingbeforethe MassachusettsDepartmentofTelecommunicationsandobtainawaiverfromtheCommission. 95 SeeEducationPartiesCommentsat10. 96 WenotethattheCompetitiveNetworksNPRMalsoraisedtheissueofwhethertheCommissionshouldamendits rulesgoverningcableinsidewiringsothattelecommunicationsserviceproviders,aswellasmultichannelvideo programmingdistributors(MVPDs),cantakeadvantageofproceduresgoverningthedispositionofhomerunwiring whenanincumbentMVPDnolongerhasalegallyenforceablerighttomaintainitshomerunwiringinabuilding. AsdiscussedintheFurtherNoticeofProposedRulemaking,SectionV.E,infra,weconcludethatwelacksufficient informationintherecordtodeterminewhethertotakethisaction,andseekfurthercommentontheissue. 23002 FederalCommunicationsCommission FCC00-366 propertyownerinmultipleunitpremisesimpactcompetitiveprovideraccessandwhethermodification ofthoserulesisappropriatetopromotecompetitiveaccess.97 43.Atthetimethecurrenttelecommunicationsinsidewmngruleswereestablished,there existedessentiallynocompetitioninthemarketfortheprovisionoflocaltelephoneservices.Inthetime sincetheenactmentoftheTelecommunicationsActof1996,manycompetitiveLECshavebegun providingservicesthatwereoncetheexclusivedomainoftheincumbents.Thereisevidence,however, thatcontinuedincumbentcontrolovermuchofthewiringinsomeMTEshashinderedthedevelopment offacilities-basedcompetitiveLECsasviablecompetitorsbyunnecessarilyrequiringthemtodealwith theircompetitorsinordertoservetheselocations.98Ontheotherhand,otherpartiesarguethatbuilding ownercontroloverinsidewiringobstructsthegrowthofcompetitorsthatuseunbundledlocalloops, becausetheywouldoftennototherwiseneedtodealwiththebuildingowner.99Inaddition,someargue thattheCommission'srulescreateconfusionregardingthelocationofthedemarcationpointandhave permitteddemarcationpointstobelocatedatinaccessibleplaces. 44.TheCommissionadopteditsdemarcationpointrulesin1984,inordertofostercompetition inthemarketforinstallationandmaintenanceoftelecommunicationsinsidewiring-thewiringthat connectscustomerpremisesequipment(CPE)tothepublicswitchedtelephonenetwork(PSTN)andto otherCPE.IOOThenewrulesestablisheda"demarcationpoint"thatmarkstheendofwiringunder controloftheLECandthebeginningofwiringunderthecontrolofthepropertyownerorsubscriber.1ol Thus,thenewrulespermittedtelecommunicationssubscribersandpremisesownerstoassumeorassign responsibilityforinstallationandmaintenanceofinsidewiring,whichpreviouslyhadbeenmanaged solelybytheLECsundertariff.102 97 SeeCompetitiveNetworksNPRM,14FCCRedat12708-9,'1!'1!65-67. 98 See,e.g.TeligentCommentsat78;WinStarCommentsat67. 99 SeeletterfromJasonD.Oxman,SeniorGovernmentAffairsCounsel,CovadCommunicationsCompany,toLeon Jaclder,StaffAttorney,FCC,datedAug.24,2000(CovadLetter).Further,buildingownerswouldnotbeobligated toprovide"conditioned"linescapableoftransmittingDigitalSubscriberLine(DSL)signals,asareincumbent LECs. 100 SeePetitionsSeekingAmendmentofPart68oftheCommission'sRulesConcerningtheConnectionof TelephoneEquipment,SystemandProtectiveApparatustotheTelephoneNetwork,FirstReportandOrder,CC DocketNo.81-216,97FCC2d527(1984)(1984DemarcationPointOrder);47C.F.R. ��68.3,68.213. 101 See47C.F.R. �68.3.ThissectioncurrentlydefmestheDemarcationPointformultipleunitpremisesasfollows: "(1)InmultiunitpremisesexistingasofAugust13,1990,theDemarcationPointshallbedeterminedinaccordance withthelocalcarrier'sreasonableandnon-discriminatorystandardoperatingpractices.Provided,however,that wheretherearemultipledemarcationpointswithinthemultiunitpremises,ademarcationpointshallnotbefurther insidethecustomer'spremisesthanapointtwelveinchesfromwherethewiringentersthecustomer'spremises,or asclosetheretoaspracticable.(2)InmultiunitpremisesinwhichwiringisinstalledafterAugust13,1990,including majoradditionsorrearrangementsofwiringexistingasofthatdate,thetelephonecompanymayestablisha reasonableandnon-discriminatorypracticeofplacingthedemarcationpointattheminimumpointofentry.Ifthe
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-387A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-387A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-387A1.txt
      • pending the outcome of the hearing. HDO, 12 FCC Rcd at 5231 n. 11. Consequently 47 C.F.R. � 73.3523(b) on its face would disallow the proposed payment. 16. We agree with the Enforcement Bureau, however, that a waiver of the payment restrictions contained in 47 C.F.R. � 73.3523(b) would serve the public interest in this case. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972). The rule restricting payments is primarily intended to deter abuse in the filing of competing applications. Where the circumstances establish that the competing applications were not filed ``for speculative or other improper purpose,'' we are willing to waive the limitations on payments to
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-388A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-388A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-388A1.txt
      • packages selected by individual subscribers. We conclude that, with no specific evidence to the contrary, the costs of compliance with these rules, on a per subscriber basis and relative to total revenues, will be small given the large subscriber base of each DBS satellite carrier. In contrast to DBS carriers, however, we note that C-Band satellite carriers, while still serving 1.3 million subscribers nationwide, are experiencing a steady decline in subscribers from a high in 1995 of nearly 2.4 million. C-Band commenters contend that Congress intended to exempt them from application of the exclusivity rules. However, they offer only an isolated and ambiguous colloquy between two Senators in support of this assertion. C-Band commenters describe their subscribers as primarily rural and
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-416A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-416A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-416A1.txt
      • degradation due to water, proximity to metal structures such as downspouts, and poor terminations, whereas currently available RG-6 coaxial cable is shielded and much less susceptible to attenuation changes and the connectors used with it provide more consistent terminations. Network Affiliates state that the current specifications for attenuation of 50 feet of RG-6 cable are 0.8-0.94 dB for low VHF, 1.3-1.4 dB for high VHF, and 2.2-2.9 dB for UHF, values which fall within the existing planning factor for Grade B. NAB agrees, pointing out that the specifications published by a leading manufacturer of antennas and cable (Winegard) for readily available RG-6 coaxial cable, the cable recommended by the UHF Comparability Report for use in downleads, are 0.7-0.95 dB (low VHF),
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-427A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-427A2.txt
      • 1.4 0.89 A WPAO AMChristian Youngstown - Warren, OH 104Farrell PAGOCOM Communications LLC 1954 0 0 0 B WBBW AMSports Youngstown - Warren, OH 104Youngstown OHCumulus Broadcasting Inc 1949 150 0.6 0.58 C WHOT FMCHR Youngstown - Warren, OH 104Youngstown OHCumulus Broadcasting Inc 1959 3400 9.3 1.31 B WLLF FMEasy Youngstown - Warren, OH 104Mercer PACumulus Broadcasting Inc 1985 175 1.3 0.68 A WPIC AMMOR Youngstown - Warren, OH 104Sharon PACumulus Broadcasting Inc 1938 525 0.8 0 B WQXK FMCountry Youngstown - Warren, OH 104Salem OHCumulus Broadcasting Inc 1958 3400 13.4 1.05 B WSOM AMOldies Youngstown - Warren, OH 104Salem OHCumulus Broadcasting Inc 1965 150 2.1 0.21 B WWIZ FMCountry Youngstown - Warren, OH 104Mercer PACumulus Broadcasting Inc 1972 325 0
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-456A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-456A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-456A2.txt
      • inter alia, the enforcement of such regulation or provision is not necessary for the protection of consumers and if forbearance is consistent with the public interest. 47 U.S.C. � 160(a). In determining whether forbearance is consistent with the public interest, the Commission must consider whether forbearance would enhance competition among telecommunications service providers. 47 U.S.C. � 160(b). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. 47 U.S.C. � 161. See Appendix I for a listing of the completed and ongoing proceedings that were initiated as a result of the 1998 Biennial Regulatory Review. This includes consideration of how adroitly, precisely, and cost-effectively the rule addresses the problem at issue. This includes consideration of whether the rule is over- or under-inclusive in its scope, and whether
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-47A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-47A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-47A1.txt
      • the CMRS LNP implementation deadline to November 24, 2002 under a section 10 forbearance analysis, we could have accomplished the same result by granting a waiver of the CMRS service provider LNP requirement in section 52.31(a) until November 24, 2002. The record for the CMRS LNP Forbearance Order contained sufficient evidence to satisfy the ``good cause'' waiver standard of section 1.3 of the Commission's rules. Specifically, the record demonstrated that the wireless industry needs additional time beyond the March 31, 2000 implementation deadline to finalize standards, produce software, and deploy number portability in their networks. The record also established that extending the deadline until November 24, 2002 will give CMRS carriers greater flexibility in that time-frame to complete network buildout, technical
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-51A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-51A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-51A1.txt
      • Broadcasting, 8 FCC Rcd 1637, � 8 (stating that allegations within petitions and supporting affidavits which "consist of ultimate, conclusory facts or more general allegations on information and belief, supported by general affidavits . . are not sufficient." (quoting Gencom v. FCC, 823 F.2d 171, n.11). See 47 C.F.R. � 90.139(c) (1992) (Commission processing of applications). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (Suspension, amendment or waiver of rules). See 47 C.F.R. � 90.175 (1992) (Frequency coordination requirements). See 47 C.F.R. �� 90.119(a)(1), 90.119(a)(3) (1992) (FCC Form 574 shall be used to apply for new station authorizations and for modification of an existing authorization). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1102(6) (Schedule of charges for private radio service, Land Mobile Stations: (a) New, Reinstatement, Modification
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-53A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-53A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-53A1.txt
      • marketed its IS-661 models at tradeshows, in brochures, by direct sales to prospective PCS operators and direct sales to major manufacturers, such as Nortel, which paid several million dollars for IS-661 licensing rights and, in 1995, began marketing IS-661. Id. at 36, 41. Omnipoint Opposition at 15-17, 20, 26-28. Third Report and Order, 9 FCC Rcd at 1339 n.11. Section 1.3 of our rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that, for good cause shown, we may grant waivers of our rules either pursuant to a request or on our own motion. As discussed above, we believe that Omnipoint has shown that good cause exists for a waiver of the substantial use condition. VoiceStream/Omnipoint Public Interest Statement at 6, 11. Id. at
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-53A1_Erratum.doc
      • marketed its IS-661 models at tradeshows, in brochures, by direct sales to prospective PCS operators and direct sales to major manufacturers, such as Nortel, which paid several million dollars for IS-661 licensing rights and, in 1995, began marketing IS-661. Id. at 36, 41. Omnipoint Opposition at 15-17, 20, 26-28. Third Report and Order, 9 FCC Rcd at 1339 n.11. Section 1.3 of our rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that, for good cause shown, we may grant waivers of our rules either pursuant to a request or on our own motion. As discussed above, we believe that Omnipoint has shown that good cause exists for a waiver of the substantial use condition. VoiceStream/Omnipoint Public Interest Statement at 6, 11. Id. at
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-76A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-76A1.pdf
      • regulated by the Commission do not pose a hazard to air safety, and will rely on our antenna structure registration program to fulfill our statutory responsibilities in this area. V. ORDERING CLAUSES 17. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 303(q) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i) and 303(q), and Sections 1.2, 1.3 and 1.429 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.2, 1.3 and 1.429, that the petition for partial reconsideration filed by of Comp Comm, Inc., on February 24, 1996, IS DENIED. 18. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for partial reconsideration filed by the Wireless Cable Association International, Inc., on March 6, 1996, IS DISMISSED AS MOOT. 19. IT
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-107A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-107A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-107A1.txt
      • the area of the continental United States. New Skies Petition at 20-24 and Consolidated Reply at 3-4; as clarified in Letter from William M. Wiltshire, Counsel for New Skies Satellites, N.V. to Secretary, FCC, dated January 22, 2001(Wiltshire January 22 letter). New Skies Petition at 21. New Skies Petition at 22-23; Wiltshire January 22 letter at 1. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (``Any provision of the rules may be waived by the Commission on its own motion or on petition if good cause therefor is shown''). WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969)(``WAIT Radio''). While we address New Skies' request as a petition for waiver, we could have treated it as a request to modify the licenses issued in
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-123A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-123A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-123A1.txt
      • WB Petition at 21). WB Petition at 21. Davis Opposition at 2-6 (citing Carolina Petition at 1-3; Kelly Petition at 11-14; WB Petition at 21). KM Reply at 5 (citing Section 336(f)(2)(A)(i)(II)). PAI Petition at 5-7(citing Report and Order at �� 17-20); Univision Petition at 6-7. Report and Order at � 20. PAI Petition at 7. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. 47 U.S.C. � 336(f)(2)(A)(i)(III). 47 U.S.C. � 336(f)(2)(A)(ii). Report and Order at �� 23-31. IBN Petition at 1-2; Tiger Eye Petition at 4-6. CBA Petition at 11-12; Grossman Petition at 2. Report and Order at �� 21-31. Report and Order at � 23. Tiger Eye Petition at 4-6. Id. at 4-5. See Main Studio and Program Origination Rules, 2 FCC
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.txt
      • for DSL loops in Massachusetts. These results further support our conclusion that Verizon provides competing carriers with maintenance and repair service in substantially the same time and manner as Verizon's own retail operations. Competing carriers experienced a trouble report rate of 1.9 percent for the months of September through December 2000 while Verizon experienced trouble report rates at a comparable 1.3 percent rate. See MR 2-02/2-03 (Maintenance, 2-Wire xDSL Services, Network Trouble Report Rate, Loop; Network Trouble Report Rate, Central Office). Although nondiscriminatory access to subloops technically falls under checklist item 2, we treat subloops in this section because it is logically related to the provision of unbundled loops. UNE Remand Order at para. 206. The Commission held that technically feasible
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-13A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-13A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-13A1.txt
      • unserved areas of the Mescalero Apache Reservation. We will not, however, routinely grant waiver of this rule and those seeking a waiver of section 54.305 will bear a heavy burden. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 254, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.305 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.305 filed by Mescalero Apache Telecom, Inc., IS GRANTED, as described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Magalie Roman Salas Secretary Mescalero Apache Telecom Inc., GTE Southwest Incorporated, and Valor Telecommunications of New Mexico, LLC, Joint Petition for Waiver
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-143A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-143A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-143A1.txt
      • send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. V. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4, 201-205, 254, 303(r), and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154, 201-205, 254, 303(r), 403, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 1.411 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 1.411, this FURTHER NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING and ORDER IS ADOPTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline for the implementation of non-recurring services in Funding Year 3 of the schools and libraries universal support mechanism for all applicants is extended from June 30,
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-158A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-158A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-158A1.txt
      • 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. 47 C.F.R. �2.1(c). Letter from Dale N. Hatfield, Chief of the Office of Engineering and Technology, to Mitchell Lazarus, August 18, 2000. Application for Review, September 20, 2000. The Commission gave public notice of receipt of the Application for Review. See DA 00-2317, October 17, 2000. See 47 C.F.R. ��15.257(a), (b), (c), and (d). 47 C.F.R. �1.3 grants the Commission authority to waive any provision of its rules provided good cause is demonstrated. See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969). 5 U.S.C. � 603. See Joint Petition for Clarification or, in the Alternative, Partial Reconsideration filed October 25, 2000 in ET Docket 99-231 on behalf of 3Comm, Apple Computer, Cisco Systems,
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-162A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-162A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-162A1.txt
      • that a mandatory categories freeze for all rate-of-return carriers would provide disincentives for these carriers to deploy new technologies due to insufficient cost recovery. Furthermore, the Joint Board recognized that a categories freeze may have a negative impact on some rate-of-return carriers' current universal service high cost support levels. The Joint Board noted that COE Category 4.13 and CW&F Category 1.3 are included in the current Universal Service High Cost Loop formula that is used for the rate-of-return carriers under Part 36. The investment levels in these two categories may increase for rate-of-return carriers as new technologies are deployed, such as facilities to provide DSL services. If the category relationships are frozen at the current year level, rate-of-return carriers may not
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-173A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-173A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-173A1.txt
      • segment. January 16, 2001 Letter at Attachment B, Attachment 1 at � 2.1; Answer at 3, � 5; COMSAT Brief at 4; IDB Supplemental Brief at 4. See January 16, 2001 Letter at Exhibit A. Id. at Exhibit A, � 1.8. Id. at Exhibit A, Annex A, � 1.1. Id. at Exhibit A, � 2.3. Id. at Exhibit A, � 1.3. See February 2, 2001 Letter at 1. COMSAT Brief at 4, 7, 9; IDB Mobile Communications, Inc. v. COMSAT Corporation, IDB Mobile Communications, Inc. Final Reply, File No. E-97-48 (filed Mar. 9, 1998) at 10-11 (``IDB Reply''). IDB Mobile Communications, Inc. v. COMSAT Corporation, Reply Brief of COMSAT Corporation, File No. E-97-48 (filed Mar. 9, 1998) at 3 (``COMSAT Reply'');
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A1.txt
      • loop or UNE-P raises significant additional issues concerning the precise extent of an incumbent LEC's resale obligations under the Act and the ASCENT decision that we do not reach in this proceeding. Waiver of Procedural Requirements. We waive the Commission's general procedures restricting the submission of late filed information by section 271 applicants on our own motion pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, to the extent necessary to consider the additional information and tariff changes discussed above. The Commission's procedural rules governing section 271 applications provide that when an applicant files new information after the comment date, the Commission retains discretion to start the 90-day review period again or to accord such information no weight in determining section 271
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-216A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-216A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-216A1.txt
      • and the Reconsideration Order and summarized in this paragraph, the Bureau reasonably concluded that granting earth station applications filed before the associated space stations have been authorized would not serve the public interest, convenience, and necessity. Dismissal Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 8154 (para. 10). Dismissal Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 8154 (para. 10). TelQuest Reply at 3. See Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (WAIT Radio); Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). 1996 Conditional Support in Principle at 1. These five requirements are as follows: (1) The DBS licenses would be owned and operated by Telesat,
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-231A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-231A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-231A1.txt
      • Bell Atlantic/NYNEX Merger Order, Public Notice, DA 01-810 (Mar. 30, 2001). While considering the request, the Bureau extended Verizon's May 15, 2001 filing deadline to August 15, 2001. See Letter from Kenneth Moran, Chief, Accounting Safeguards Division, Common Carrier Bureau, to Mr. Gordon Evans, Vice President, Federal Regulatory, Verizon (July 13, 2001). See 47 U.S.C. � 416(b); 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; Applications of Ameritech Corp., Transferor, and SBC Communications, Inc., Transferee, For Consent to Transfer Control of Corporations Holding Commission Licenses and Lines Pursuant to Sections 214 and 310(d) of the Communications Act and Parts 5, 22, 24, 25, 63, 90, 95, and 101 of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket 98-141, Second Memorandum Opinion and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 17521, 17532,
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-268A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-268A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-268A1.txt
      • those costs from their customers. Although we dismiss Federal Transtel's petition, we will incorporate a copy of its petition into the record relating to the Contribution Methodology NPRM. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 254, and 405 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 254, and 405, and sections 1.3, 1.429 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.429, that the Petition for Waiver or Reconsideration filed July 20, 1999 by Federal Transtel, Inc. IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Magalie Roman Salas Secretary Petition of Federal Transtel, Inc. for Waiver or, in the Alternative, for Reconsideration, CC Docket No. 96-45, filed on July 20, 1999 (Federal Transtel Petition). See
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-292A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-292A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-292A1.txt
      • 477-78 (1940); Gregory v. Helvering, 293 U.S. 465, 469-70 (1935). See ITC Public Notice Comments at 1-3; PSI Public Notice Comments at 2-3. 47 C.F.R. � 36.2(c)(2). See 47 C.F.R. �� 32.27(b), 36.2(c)(2). See Waiver Request at 4. See id. See Waiver Request at 6; ITC Public Notice Comments at 4-6; PSI Public Notice Comments at 3-6. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972). Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1157. Id.; Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. See Motion for Stay at 1. Federal Communications Commission FCC 01-292 a b � � � �
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-29A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-29A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-29A1.txt
      • information no weight in determining section 271 compliance. An exception to this approach exists for new information that is directly responsive to allegations raised in the comments. The Commission has also strictly limited the consideration of developments that occur after the date for filing comments. In this proceeding, we waive these procedural requirements on our own motion pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, to the extent necessary to consider rate reductions filed by SWBT on day 63 of the 90-day period for Commission review of the Kansas and Oklahoma section 271 applications. ``[A] waiver is appropriate only if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule and such deviation will serve the public interest.'' We conclude that the
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-304A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-304A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-304A1.txt
      • in consumers with only one line paying more than they otherwise would had the LECs simply passed onto them directly the $1.04 worth of permitted revenues that the LEC recovers through the single-line PICC.''). We note that the current average multi-line business PICC paid by interexchange carriers to price cap carriers is $1.41, Trends in Telephone Service, August, 2001, Table 1.3, Page 1-7, compared to the following PICC charges assessed by the three largest interexchange carriers to multi-line business customers: $3.40 for AT&T (Tariff FCC No. 30, 1st Revised Page 29.3, Section C.3, effective September 14, 2001); $3.65 for WorldCom (Tariff FCC No. 1, 5th Revised Page No. 288, Section C.1, effective March 1, 2001); and $4.31 for Sprint (Tariff FCC
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-305A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-305A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-305A1.txt
      • Telephone Company Request for an Extension of Time to File ARMIS Reports, ASD File No. 00-43, Order, 15 FCC Rcd 24093 (Com.Car.Bur. 2000); CenturyTel, Inc. and CenturyTel of Washington, Inc. Request for Extension of Time to Submit Cost Allocation Manual Attestation Reports and File ARMIS Reports, ASD File No. 00-45, Order, 16 FCC Rcd 1493 (Com.Car.Bur. 2000). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See United States Telephone Association Petition for Waiver of Part 32 of the Commission's Rules, Order, 13 FCC Rcd 214 (Com. Car. Bur. 1997) (citing Northeast Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C.Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular); WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C.Cir. 1969), cert. denied 409 U.S. 1027 (1972) (WAIT Radio). See Notice at �� 87-98.
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-329A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-329A1.txt
      • definition of the relevant geographic scope of relevant markets, see United States v. Philadelphia Nat'l Bank, 374 U.S. 321, 359 (1963) (defining relevant geographic market as an area in which a buyer may purchase a product or service from alternative sources, or in which the presence of other sellers restrains prices charged to buyers). 120 See 1992 Merger Guidelines � 1.3. 121 See, e.g. Philadelphia Nat'l Bank, 374 U.S. at 363 ("[A] significant increase in the concentration . . . must be enjoined in the absence of evidence clearly showing that the merger is not likely to have such anticompetitive effects."). See also 1992 Horizontal Guidelines at 41558 �� 2.1, 2.2; New York v. Kraft General Foods, 926 F. Supp. 321,
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-330A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-330A1.pdf
      • licensee to meet the signal strength requirements for the community of license. See, e.g., Petitions for Reconsideration of MSTV/NAB/ALTV at 9; Joint Broadcasters at 5; APTS/PBS at 8; Delta College at 2-4; Petition for Reconsideration of APTS/PBS at 8-9. Of course, the Commission may waive any provision of its rules upon a showing of good cause. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Specifically, the FCC may exercise its discretion to waive a rule where ``particular facts would make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest'' and where ``special circumstances'' might warrant a waiver. WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972) (``An applicant for waiver faces a high hurdle even at the starting
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-350A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-350A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-350A1.txt
      • subject to the provided conditions. We are confident that this waiver will ensure that appropriate steps will be made to ensure the integrity of the schools and libraries universal service mechanism. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), and 254 and sections 1.3, 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, the waiver request filed by the State of Alaska on January 29, 2001, is GRANTED, subject to the conditions indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Magalie Roman Salas Secretary Petition of the State of Alaska for Waiver for the Utilization
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-369A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-369A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-369A1.txt
      • Four parties filed letters in support of the transaction. One party, Litigation Recovery Trust (LRT) filed in opposition to the proposed transaction. On August 23, 2001, LRT submitted a filing outside the established pleading cycle (Supplement to Petition to Deny), along with a motion for waiver requesting that the Commission accept its August 23, 2001 filing (Waiver Request). Under Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, we are authorized to grant waivers "if good cause therefor is shown." As interpreted by the courts, this requires that a petitioner demonstrate that "special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule and such a deviation will serve the public interest." The LRT Supplement to Petition to Deny largely concerns a newspaper article that has
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-389A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-389A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-389A1.txt
      • there were an estimated 12 million digital cable subscribers industry-wide. Some predict that digital video subscriptions will reach 15.1 million by the end of 2001. As of year-end 2000, Cox reported approximately 840,000 digital video subscribers. As of June 2001, Cox reported approximately one million digital video subscribers. Analysts estimate that by year-end 2001, Cox will have as many as 1.3 million subscribers. As of June 2001, Comcast reported 1.8 million digital video subscribers and expects to end the year with as many as 2.2 million digital video subscribers. As of June 2001, Adelphia had approximately 1.5 million digital video subscribers with a target of 1.8 million digital video subscribers by year-end. As of year-end 2000, AOL Time Warner had more
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-86A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-86A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-86A1.txt
      • program years, it should take steps to ensure that all applicable certifications necessary to secure federal high-cost support are filed with the Commission before the expiration of the applicable filing deadline. III. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1-4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 U.S.C. � 1.3, that the Petition for waiver of section 54.313(c)(2)(i) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.313(c)(2)(i), filed by the West Virginia Public Service Commission on January 29, 2001, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Magalie Roman Salas Secretary Public Service Commission of West Virginia's Request for Leave to
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-89A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-89A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-89A1.txt
      • the outline of this Second Further Notice, such comments must be included in a clearly labelled section at the beginning or end of the filing. For further information contact: Pam Slipakoff at (202) 418-7705 (voice), (202) 418-0484 (TTY), or pslipako@fcc.gov (e-mail). ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91(a), 0.204, 0.291 and 1.3, that enforcement of the requirement that Telecommunications Relay Services must be capable of handling coin sent-paid calls, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 64.604(a)(3), IS SUSPENDED pending the publication in the Federal Register of final rules adopted in this proceeding. This Order is effective upon release. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that common carriers providing telephone voice transmission services, and TRS
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-92A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-92A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-92A1.txt
      • representatives from a number of Federal Agencies and assists the Assistant Secretary of Commerce, Communications and Information in assigning frequencies to U.S. Government radio stations and in developing and executing policies, programs, procedures, and technical criteria pertaining to the allocation, management, and use of the spectrum. See NTIA Manual of Regulations and Procedures for Federal Frequency Management (NTIA Manual), Section 1.3. See NTIA Manual, Section 4.3.7A. The exact bands subject to Federal Government narrowbanding are 162.0125-173.2 MHz and 173.4-174 MHz. 47 C.F.R. � 74.402. 47 C.F.R. � 2.106, Note US11. The Tennessee Valley Authority Area is described in detail in Footnote US11. This area encompasses Tennessee, the southern portion of Kentucky, southwest Virginia, most of Mississippi and Alabama, Northern Georgia, the
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-107A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-107A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-107A1.txt
      • and charged 9.4% less per channel than noncompetitive operators. Table 2. Differential between the Competitive and Noncompetitive Groups Competitive Differential Percent Date Competitive Noncompetitive Amount Percent Average Monthly Rate July 1, 2001 $34.93 $37.13 $2.20 6.3% * July 1, 2000 $32.49 $34.54 $2.05 6.3% * Number of Channels July 1, 2001 60.9 59.3 -1.6 -2.6% July 1, 2000 57.5 56.2 -1.3 -2.3% Average Rate per Channel (Programming Only) July 1, 2001 $0.551 $0.603 $0.052 9.4% * July 1, 2000 $0.551 $0.594 $0.043 7.8% * An asterisk denotes a statistically significant differential. See Attachments B-1, B-2, and B-3. *An asterisk denotes a statistically significant difference between the two groups. In order to determine if the competitive differentials shown in Table 2 hold
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-108A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-108A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-108A1.txt
      • supra n.2, at Appendix B. Figure is for wireline and wireless carriers. Id. Figure is for wireline carriers only. Based on 96-98 million U.S. households with wireline telephone service, the cost would average 28 cents per subscribing household. See n.153, supra. Specifically, a $27 million charge to carriers, converted to a rate increase to 96-98 million residential ratepayers, would average 1.3 cents per month per ratepayer using a relatively rapid amortization period of two years and a relatively high discount rate of 12%; and would average 0.5 cents per month per ratepayer using a relatively slow amortization period of 5 years and a relatively low discount rate of 6%. See � 8, supra. House Report No. 103-827, at 3493. USTA Comments,
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-114A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-114A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-114A1.txt
      • as well. See Bell Atlantic/GTE Merger Order at Appendix D, Attachment A, � 9. See Verizon January 10th Letter at 2. See Common Carrier Bureau Seeks Comment on Verizon's Request for a Temporary Suspension of Two Merger Conditions, CC Docket No. 98-184, Public Notice, DA 02-419 (rel. Feb. 22, 2002). See 47 U.S.C. � 416(b); 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3; Applications of GTE Corporation, Transferor, and Bell Atlantic Corporation, Transferee, For Consent to Transfer Control of Domestic and International Sections 214 and 310 Authorizations and Application to Transfer Control of a Submarine Cable Landing License, CC Docket No. 98-184, Order, DA 01-2203, at � 7 (Com. Car. Bur. rel. Sept. 26, 2001) (finding in the public interest Verizon's request to
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-116A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-116A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-116A1.txt
      • 619.5 10.2 57.2 -0.1 119 810.3 891.33 -173.2 -172.1 926.7 14.4 116.4 1.1 Salt Lake City, UT Satellite Baseline Outage Baseline Outage plus 10% Increase EPFD For 10% Increase FCC Adopted EPFD Outage With FCC EPFD Outage Increase Difference Between Calculated And FCC EPFDs (minutes) (minutes) (dBW/m2/4 kHz) (minutes) % (minutes) DB 101 65.5 72.05 -172.3 -171.0 75.6 15.4 10.1 1.3 110 64.4 70.84 -172.5 -171.0 74.5 15.7 10.1 1.5 119 84.9 93.39 -173.4 -171.0 101.2 19.2 16.3 2.4 Omaha, Nebraska Satellite Baseline Outage Baseline Outage plus 10% Increase EPFD For 10% Increase FCC Adopted EPFD Outage With FCC EPFD Outage Increase Difference Between Calculated And FCC EPFDs (minutes) (minutes) (dBW/m2/4 kHz) (minutes) % (minutes) DB 101 360.3 396.33 -168.8 -169.8
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-121A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-121A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-121A1.txt
      • 4-5; National Association for the Deaf (NAD) Comments, at 6-7; Telecommunications for the Deaf, Inc. (TDI) Comments, at 6; Self Help for Hard of Hearing People (SHHH) Comments, at 8; California Public Utilities Commission (California) Comments, at 3-4; Dana Mulvany Comments, at 5-6; Ronald Vickery Comments, at 4. FPC v Texaco, Inc., 377 U.S. 33, 39 (1964). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Id. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc., v. Volpe, 401 U.S. 402, 416 (1971). WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969). Northeast Cellular Telephone Company, L.P v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166(D.C. Cir. 1990). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; Part 68 Waiver Request of Alameda Engineering Inc., et al, Order, 10 FCC Rcd. 12135, 12139 (1995).
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-136A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-136A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-136A1.txt
      • interference to such uses are not serious because the communications can be repeated. ARRL also claims that PLCs operating in the 135.7-137.8 kHz and 160-190 kHz bands are not likely to receive interference which might interrupt the power grid, even if co-frequency operation occurs. ARRL's analysis shows that with its suggested EIRP of 2 W, a separation distance of about 1.3 km from PLC systems operating on 161 kV power lines is needed to avoid interference. The separation distance decreases to approximately 170 meters for PLC systems operating on 765 kV power lines. ARRL contends that, at these frequencies and corresponding wavelengths, the antenna inefficiencies and ground losses would prevent amateur operations from generating interfering signals. ARRL states it could not
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-139A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-139A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-139A1.txt
      • ...................................... 15�07'08.4'' 145�43'45.7'' E St. Louis, MO--IL: Spirit of St. Louis (SUS) ............................................ St. Louis-Lambert Int'l (STC) ..................................... 38�39'42.7" 38�44'51.7" 90�39'04.4" 90�21'35.9" St. Petersburg, FL: Albert Whitted Municipal (SPG) ................................. St. Petersburg Clearwater Int'l (PIE) ............................. 27�45'54.4" 27�54'38.8" 82�37'37.1" 82�41'14.9" Salt Lake City, UT: Salt Lake City Int'l (SLC) ........................................... 40�47'18.2" 111�58'39.9" San Antonio, TX: San Antonio Int'l (SAT) .............................................. 29�32'01.3" 98�28'11.2" San Diego, CA: San Diego Lindbergh Int'l (SAN) ................................ 32�44'00.8'' 117�11'22.8'' San Francisco-Oakland, CA: Metropolitan Oakland Int'l (OAK) ............................... San Francisco Int'l (SFO) .......................................... 37�43'16.7" 37�37'08.4" 122�13'14.6" 122�22'29.4" San Jose, CA: San Jose Int'l (SJC) .................................................. 37�21'42.7" 121� 55'44.4" San Juan, PR: Luis Munoz (SJU) .................................................. 18�26'21.9'' 66�00'06.6'' Santa Barbara, CA: Santa Barbara Municipal (SBA) ................................ 34�25'34.4'' 119�50'25.3'' Santa
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.txt
      • for some metrics during the period provided there may be changes in the metric definition, or changes in the retail analog applied, making it difficult to compare data over time. LIST OF AGGREGATE PERFORMANCE METRICS Metric No. SQM No. Metric Name RESALE Ordering A.1.1 O-7 % Rejected Service Requests - Mechanized A.1.2 O-7 % Rejected Service Requests - Partially Mechanized A.1.3 O-7 % Rejected Service Requests - Non-Mechanized A.1.4 O-8 Reject Interval - Mechanized A.1.7 O-8 Reject Interval - Partially Mechanized - 10 hours A.1.8 O-8 Reject Interval - Non-Mechanized A.1.9 O-9 FOC Timeliness - Mechanized A.1.12 O-9 FOC Timeliness - Partially Mechanized - 10 hours A.1.13 O-9 FOC Timeliness - Non-Mechanized A.1.14 O-11 FOC & Reject Response Completeness - Mechanized
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-176A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-176A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-176A1.txt
      • of the current status of competition in the market for the distribution of video programming. AOLTW and other cable MSO commenters assert that the exclusivity prohibition should sunset in light of indisputable competitive developments in the MVPD market. NCTA notes that in 1992, multichannel competitors to cable comprised about one million C-band satellite dish customers, about 300,000 MMDS customers, and 1.3 million overbuild customers. NCTA states that the situation had not changed materially by the time the First Report on Competition was issued two years after the 1992 Cable Act was passed. NCTA argues that today cable competes with these providers and a wide range of others. NCTA asserts that customers have increasingly subscribed to these alternatives, with non-cable subscribership growing
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-179A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-179A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-179A1.txt
      • 11, 2002. ALLTEL to Purchase CenturyTel's Wireless Properties for $1.65 billion, News Release, ALLTEL, Mar. 19, 2002. In 2001, ALLTEL made an unsolicited $6.1 billion bid for all of CenturyTel, but the offer was rejected. Communications Daily, Mar. 20, 2002. Also included in the transaction are minority partnership interests in cellular operations of 2 million POPs, and PCS licenses covering 1.3 million POPs in Wisconsin and Iowa. Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Grants Consent for the Transfer of Control of Licenses from Centurytel, Inc. to ALLTEL Communications, Inc., Public Notice, DA 02-1366 (rel. June 12, 2002). U.S. Cellular Enters into Agreement to Purchase PrimeCo Wireless, News Release, U.S. Cellular, May 10, 2002. Id. Application of Pacific Wireless, Inc. and Nextel of California, Inc.
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-179A1_Erratum.doc
      • 11, 2002. ALLTEL to Purchase CenturyTel's Wireless Properties for $1.65 billion, News Release, ALLTEL, Mar. 19, 2002. In 2001, ALLTEL made an unsolicited $6.1 billion bid for all of CenturyTel, but the offer was rejected. Communications Daily, Mar. 20, 2002. Also included in the transaction are minority partnership interests in cellular operations of 2 million POPs, and PCS licenses covering 1.3 million POPs in Wisconsin and Iowa. Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Grants Consent for the Transfer of Control of Licenses from Centurytel, Inc. to ALLTEL Communications, Inc., Public Notice, DA 02-1366 (rel. June 12, 2002). U.S. Cellular Enters into Agreement to Purchase PrimeCo Wireless, News Release, U.S. Cellular, May 10, 2002. Id. Application of Pacific Wireless, Inc. and Nextel of California, Inc.
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-181A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-181A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-181A1.txt
      • Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) and found to impose no new or modified reporting or recordkeeping requirements or burdens to the public. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4, 10, 201-02, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934 as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 1-4, 10, 201-02, and 254, and sections 1.3 and 1.103 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 1.103, this ORDER AND SECOND ORDER ON RECONSIDERATION is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that section 54.904(d) IS WAIVED with respect to the filing required pursuant to that rule on June 30, 2002. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that section 54.303(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.303(b), is
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-190A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-190A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-190A1.txt
      • to the Public Notice, ``AM Auction Filing Window and Application Freeze,'' 14 FCC Rcd 19490 (1999). See Public Notice, ``AM Auction No. 32 Non-Mutually Exclusive Applications,'' 15 FCC Rcd 18004 (2000). File No. BNP-20001023ACZ. File No. BP-19990929ABJ. Affidavit of Donald L. Markey, P.E., attached to Star's waiver request. 47 C.F.R. � 73.3571(h). 47 C.F.R. � 73.3522(a)(3). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See, e.g., Northeast Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990); WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972) (``WAIT Radio''). See Tucson Radio, Inc. v. F.C.C., 452 F.2d 1380, 1382 (D.C. Cir. 1971); WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1157. See Public Notice, ``Mass Media Bureau Lists Commercial FM
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-197A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-197A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-197A1.txt
      • with one exception, we find LRT's multiple supplemental filings made subsequent to the end of the pleading cycle in the reconsideration phase of this proceeding unacceptable under our rules. While LRT has accompanied its 5 supplemental filings with motions to accept those comments, we are unpersuaded by the reasons advanced by LRT for accepting additional, often repetitive, filings. Under Section 1.3 of the rules, the Commission may waive its general rules of practice and procedure ``for good cause shown.'' As interpreted by the courts, this requires that a petitioner demonstrate that ``special circumstances'' warrant a deviation from the general rule and such a deviation will serve the public interest. In its motions to accept its various supplemental reply comments, LRT maintains
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-210A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-210A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-210A1.txt
      • of the Commission's Rules To Ensure Compatibility with Enhanced 911 Emergency Calling Systems Phase II Compliance Deadlines for Non-Nationwide CMRS Carriers ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CC Docket No. 94-102 Adopted: July 11, 2002 Released: July 26, 2002 By the Commission: ORDER TO STAY Introduction In this Order, we reluctantly, and temporarily stay, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, the application of certain specific E911 Phase II deadlines set forth in section 20.18(f) and (g) of the Commission's rules to two classes of non-nationwide Commercial Mobile Radio Service (CMRS) providers who have filed requests relating to those deadlines. Specifically, we extend our E911 Phase II interim handset and network upgrade compliance deadlines by seven months
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-230A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-230A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-230A1.txt
      • sales of set-top DTV receivers and receivers with an integrated DTV tuner were only 128,845 units and 70,295 units respectively. This contrasts sharply with information from the same market research showing that sales of DTV-ready receivers, i.e. receivers that can display DTV programming but do not have the capability to tune over-the-air DTV signals or decode them for display, exceeded 1.3 million units in 2001. CEA's market research report also indicates that sales of all digital television products, including set-top DTV tuner units and receivers with an integrated DTV tuner, are continuing to increase. We believe the overall level of DTV equipment sales provides a strong indication that consumers are interested in higher quality video and DTV service. However, they are
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-257A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-257A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-257A1.txt
      • would not cause harmful interference if Onsat communicates with other satellites. Onsat Waiver Order, DA 00-2663, 15 FCC Rcd at 24491-92 (para. 8). Also, Onsat failed to show that it faced any unusual hardship that would warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. Onsat Waiver Order, DA 00-2663, 15 FCC Rcd at 24491-92 (para. 8). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (2001) (petitioners seeking a waiver must show "good cause"), WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (WAIT Radio). See FWCC Request for Declaratory Ruling on Partial-Band Licensing of Earth Stations in the Fixed Satellite Service That Share Terrestrial Spectrum, First Report and Order, IB Docket No. 00-203, FCC 01-177, 16 FCC Rcd 11511 (2001) (FWCC/Onsat First
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-257A1_Erratum.doc
      • would not cause harmful interference if Onsat communicates with other satellites. Onsat Waiver Order, DA 00-2663, 15 FCC Rcd at 24491-92 (para. 8). Also, Onsat failed to show that it faced any unusual hardship that would warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. Onsat Waiver Order, DA 00-2663, 15 FCC Rcd at 24491-92 (para. 8). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (2001) (petitioners seeking a waiver must show "good cause"), WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (WAIT Radio). See FWCC Request for Declaratory Ruling on Partial-Band Licensing of Earth Stations in the Fixed Satellite Service That Share Terrestrial Spectrum, First Report and Order, IB Docket No. 00-203, FCC 01-177, 16 FCC Rcd 11511 (2001) (FWCC/Onsat First
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-268A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-268A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-268A1.txt
      • Federal Communications Commission, to Thomas W. Dean, Esq., Litigation Director, NORML Foundation, 16 FCC Rcd 1421 (2000). 16 FCC Rcd at 1424. Ad Council Request at 7. Drug-Free National Media Campaign Act of 1998, 21 U.S.C. � 1801 et seq. 11 FCC Rcd 20415, 20418 (MMB 1996). Ad Council Request at 7. Ad Council Request at 9. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Ad Council Request at 10-11. Ad Council Request at 3. Ad Council Request at 11. Ad Council Request at 11. 34 FCC 2d 600 (1972) (``Young & Rubican''). 47 C.F. R. � 73.1212(e). 44 Stat. 1162, 1170. 41 RR2d 877, 878 (1977), citing Sponsorship Identification, 40 FCC 2 (1950). Application of Sponsorship Identification Rules to political broadcast, teaser announcements, governmental
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-284A1.txt
      • little or no firmly demonstrated traffic commitments.'' Rulemaking on the Licensing of Space Stations in the Domestic Fixed-Satellite Service and Related Revisions of Part 25 of the Rules and Regulations, CC Docket No. 81-704, Report and Order, 54 RR 2d 577 (1983), See also Licensing Space Stations in the Domestic Fixed-Satellite Service, 50 Fed. Reg 36071 (Sept. 5, 1985). Section 1.3 of the Commission rules provides that waivers may be granted when good cause is shown. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. According to criteria delineated by the Court of Appeals a waiver is appropriate only when it is found in light of special circumstances presented in the case at hand that granting such relief would not undermine the underlying purpose of
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-298A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-298A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-298A1.txt
      • from a number of Federal Agencies and assists the Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Communications and Information in assigning frequencies to U.S. Government radio stations and in developing and executing policies, programs, procedures, and technical criteria pertaining to the allocation, management, and use of the spectrum. See NTIA Manual of Regulations and Procedures for Federal Frequency Management (NTIA Manual), Section 1.3. See NTIA Manual, Section 4.3.7A. The bands subject to Federal Government narrowbanding are 162.0125-173.2 MHz and 173.4-174 MHz. 47 C.F.R. � 74.402. The exceptions are within 150 miles of New York City, where these frequencies are reserved for use by public safety users; in Alaska; or in the Tennessee Valley Authority area. The Tennessee Valley Authority Area is described in
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-309A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-309A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-309A1.txt
      • 6565) into Account 6562, Depreciation and amortization expenses; (4) the revised ``Loop Sheath Kilometers'' data collection in Table II of ARMIS Report 43-07; Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 5(c), 201, 202 and 220 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), 201, 202, and 220, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, implementation of certain rule modifications described in paragraph five above IS SUSPENDED until July 1, 2003. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Federal-State Joint Conference on Accounting Issues, Order, WC Docket No. 02-269, FCC 02-240 (September 5, 2002) (Convening Order); Federal-State Joint Conference on Accounting Issues, Order, WC Docket No. 02-269,
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-310A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-310A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-310A1.txt
      • video programming, telephony, and high-speed Internet services. These non-consolidated interests include AT&T's interest in TWE, which owns both cable systems and video programming services. TWE serves approximately 12.8 million subscribers and is the nation's second largest cable operator. AT&T's non-consolidated interests also include Insight Midwest, a Delaware limited partnership which owns and operates cable systems in Indiana, and serves approximately 1.3 million subscribers. As general partner, Insight Communications manages the business of the partnership, although certain matters require the approval of AT&T. Another AT&T non-consolidated interest is Texas Cable Partners (``TCP''), a Delaware limited partnership that owns and operates cable systems in Texas, and serves approximately 1.12 million customers. The remaining 50% partnership interest is owned by Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse Partnership,
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-314A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-314A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-314A1.txt
      • the EUCL charges were imposed. Second, Complainants assert that, irrespective of the accrual date of their causes of action, the statute of limitations should be tolled on equitable and administrative grounds, based on the filing of a petition for declaratory ruling by a payphone trade association (APCC) and the voluminous number of informal complaints. Complainants seek a waiver, under Section 1.3 of our Rules, of the application of Section 415(b) of the Act, which provides a party with two years from the date the cause of action accrues to file a complaint. Based on Commission and court precedent, as well as the facts of this case, as discussed below, we decline to extend the recovery period for which Complainants may collect
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-329A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-329A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-329A1.txt
      • H. Dortch, Federal Communications Commission, filed Dec. 3, 2002 (Sprint Dec. 3 Ex Parte). See AT&T Dec. 4 Ex Parte at 4. Id. See Sprint Dec. 3 Ex Parte at 3. If a carrier believes that it has special circumstances that warrant deviation from the rules, that carrier may request a waiver of the Commission's rules. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See id. See Policy and Rules Concerning the Interstate, Interexchange Marketplace, Implementation of Section 254(g) of the Communications Act of 1934, CC Docket No. 96-61, Order on Reconsideration, 12 FCC Rcd 15014 (1997); Policy and Rules Concerning the Interstate, Interexchange Marketplace, Implementation of Section 254(g) of the Communications Act of 1934, CC Docket No. 96-61, Second Order on Reconsideration and
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.txt
      • and the state commission can fulfill their statutory consultative roles, and to afford the Commission adequate time to evaluate the record. The Commission can waive its procedural rules, however, "if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule and such deviation will serve the public interest."66 27. We waive the complete-as-filed requirement on our own motion pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules to the extent necessary to consider the rate reduction filed by Pacific Bell on day 45.67 We conclude that the special circumstances before us here warrant a deviation from the general rules for consideration of late-filed information or developments that take place during the application review period. In particular, as we discuss below, we find that
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.txt
      • the retail analog applied, making it difficult to compare data over time. Metric SQM No.Metric Name Metric SQM No.Metric Name RESALE A.3.5 M&R-5Out of Service > 24 hours Ordering Billing A.1.1 O-7 % Rejected Service Requests � Mech. A.4.1 B-1 Invoice Accuracy A.1.2 O-7 % Rejected Service Requests - Partially Mech. A.4.2 B-2 Mean Time to Deliver Invoices � CRIS A.1.3 O-7 % Rejected Service Requests - Non-Mech. UNBUNDLED NETWORK ELEMENTS A.1.4 O-8 Reject Interval � Mech. Ordering A.1.7 O-8 Reject Interval - Partially Mech. � 10 hours B.1.1 O-7/O-13% Rejected Service Requests � Mech. A.1.8 O-8 Reject Interval - Non-Mech. B.1.2 O-7/O-13% Rejected Service Requests - Partially Mech. A.1.9 O-9 FOC Timeliness � Mech. B.1.3 O-7/O-13% Rejected Service Requests -
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-338A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-338A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-338A1.txt
      • the top ten cable operators (representing more than 85% of subscribers nationwide) will offer to carry the signals of up to five digital broadcast stations or other programming networks that provide HDTV during at least 50% of their prime time schedule or a substantial portion of their broadcast week by January 1, 2003. Comcast offers HDTV service to more than 1.3 million subscribers. In addition to providing access to high-definition broadcasts of ABC, NBC, CBS, HBO, and Showtime in selected areas, Comcast will also offer HDTV signals for certain local PBS stations and its own Comcast SportsNet. AOL Time Warner has launched HDTV in more than 40 markets including high-definition broadcasts of ABC, CBS, NBC, and PBS, as well as HBO
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-40A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-40A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-40A1.txt
      • interference is caused)). Petition at 5-9 (asserting a sunset provision was specifically rejected when Section 336(h) and the DDSA were legislated). Id. at 5. The Commission was required to report back to Congress on June 30, 2001 and June 30, 2002. See Section 336(h). Id. at 4-5. 47 C.F.R. � 74.731(g); see also 47 C.F.R. � 74.701(f). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (``Any provision of the rules may be waived by the Commission on its own motion or on petition if good cause therefor is shown.'') We will waive the following rules as inapplicable to the services provided under this pilot project: 47 C.F.R. � � 74.731(g)(permissible service), 74.732(g)(booster eligibility), 74.736(a)(emissions), 74.750(a)(FCC transmitter certification), 74.751(a)(modification of transmission systems), 74.761(frequency tolerance), and 74.763(c)(time
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-47A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-47A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-47A1.txt
      • the only non-Government services currently permitted in the 4.9 GHz band are passive and operate on a secondary (unprotected) basis. Finally, we note that the 4.9 GHz band is currently being studied internationally as a candidate band for global harmonization of spectrum for public protection and disaster relief, with band identification and regulatory provisions to be considered under Agenda Item 1.3 at the 2003 World Radio Conference (WRC-03). OBRA-93 required that the Secretary of Commerce identify at least 200 megahertz of spectrum then allocated for Government use to be transferred to non-Government use. Pursuant to these requirements, in its February 1995 Final Report on spectrum allocation, the Department of Commerce reallocated the 4660-4685 MHz band, and identified the lower adjacent 4635-4660
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-63A3.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-63A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-63A3.txt
      • General and the state commission can fulfill their statutory consultative roles, and to afford the Commission adequate time to evaluate the record. The Commission can waive its procedural rules, however, ``if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule and such deviation will serve the public interest.'' We waive the complete-as-filed requirement on our own motion pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules to the extent necessary to consider rate reductions filed by Verizon on day 80 of the 90-day period for Commission review of the Rhode Island application. We conclude that the special circumstances before us here warrant a deviation from the general rules for consideration of late-filed information or developments that take place during the application review
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-67A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-67A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-67A1.txt
      • R&O, 16 FCC Rcd at 2042 � 63. ``[T]he single most critical element [for enhancing interoperability] is the idea of bringing together decision-makers from several governmental sectors, with ultimate authority derived from the executive power of the state.'' See PSWN Program, SIECs: States' Most Effective Tool For Coordinating Interoperability, Washington State Case Study and Best Practices Guide, at 2 � 1.3 (October 8, 2001). PSWN advises that ``even federal entities are generally subject to state law for activities entirely within that state's borders unless the Congress chooses to preempt that right specifically and for a clearly defined purpose.'' Id. at 8 � 2.5. Fourth R&O, 16 FCC Rcd at 2042 � 64. Id. at 2039 � 55, ``Florida, for example, while
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-77A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-77A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-77A1.txt
      • made that choice to be a common carrier, however, both by offering `pure' transmission and by offering information services over its own facilities, neither Cox nor any other cable company with similar offerings can now avoid the undisputed legal obligations that attach to providers of such services.''). , � 36 (italics added). Id. at � 22. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972). Northeast Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). Cable operators have repeatedly stated that if local governments imposed multiple ISP access requirements, they would delay deployment of cable modem service and other services, apparently including local exchange service.
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-78A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-78A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-78A1.txt
      • must notify the Commission of any changes to this information within one week of the change. See 47 C.F.R. � 64.1195(g); see also ``Consumer Information Bureau Reminds Telecommunications Carriers of their Obligations to Register and Designate an Agent for Service of Process," Public Notice, CC Docket No. 94-129, DA 02-222 (Jan. 30, 2002). Notice at para. 31. Pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, the Commission is permitted to waive its rules if good cause is shown. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Notice at para. 31. See, e.g., Verizon Comments at 8; WorldCom Comments at 13. We note that the Common Carrier Bureau does not have authority to act on any applications or requests which present novel questions of fact, law
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-89A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-89A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-89A1.txt
      • requirements or burdens on the public. Implementation of these new or modified reporting and/or recordkeeping requirements will be subject to approval by the Office of Management and Budget. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1-4, 10, 201-202, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 1-4, 10, 201-202, and 254, and sections 1.3 and 1.103 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 and 1.103, this ORDER ON RECONSIDERATION is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as Amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, that THIS ORDER IS EFFECTIVE UPON PUBLICATION IN
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-8A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-8A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-8A1.txt
      • are available to persons with disabilities by contacting Brian Millin at (202) 418-7426, (202) 418-7365 TTY, or at bmillin@fcc.gov. VII. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4, 201-205, 254, 303(r), and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154, 201-205, 254, 303(r), 403, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 1.411 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 1.411, this NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULE MAKING IS ADOPTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Commission's Consumer Information Bureau, Reference Information Center, SHALL SEND a copy of this Notice of Proposed Rule Making, including the Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, to the Chief Counsel for
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02J-1A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02J-1A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02J-1A1.txt
      • services, even though such loops may be more costly than those needed merely to provide voice service. The model limits loop length at 18,000 feet, thereby enabling ``ADSL1'' services but not ``ADSL2'' services. 5th Report and Order � 70. Rural carriers receive loop support based on costs that, under Parts 32 and 36 of the Commission's rules, qualify as category 1.3 cable and wire (loop) or category 4.13 central office equipment (circuit equipment). In its Rural Task Force Order the Commission agreed with the Rural Task Force that the FCC's ``universal service policies should not inadvertently create barriers to the provision of access to advanced services,'' and stated that ``[we] believe that our current universal service system does not create such
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-102A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-102A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-102A1.txt
      • Provide Channel Exclusivity to Qualified Private Paging Systems at 929-930 MHz, Report and Order, PR Docket No. 93-35, 8 FCC Rcd 8318, 8325-27 (paras. 22-23) (1993) (Private Paging Exclusivity Order). In that Order, the Commission adopted a bond requirement for paging companies seeking an extension of their milestones. SES Americom Reply at 16-17. PanAmSat Reply at 3. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. For more on the meaning of "good cause" for purposes of waivers of Commission rules, see WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (WAIT Radio); Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). Private Paging Exclusivity Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 8326 n.45; Intelsat Comments at 10-11. The surety on the
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-102A1_Erratum.doc
      • Provide Channel Exclusivity to Qualified Private Paging Systems at 929-930 MHz, Report and Order, PR Docket No. 93-35, 8 FCC Rcd 8318, 8325-27 (paras. 22-23) (1993) (Private Paging Exclusivity Order). In that Order, the Commission adopted a bond requirement for paging companies seeking an extension of their milestones. SES Americom Reply at 16-17. PanAmSat Reply at 3. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. For more on the meaning of "good cause" for purposes of waivers of Commission rules, see WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (WAIT Radio); Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). Private Paging Exclusivity Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 8326 n.45; Intelsat Comments at 10-11. The surety on the
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-106A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-106A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-106A1.txt
      • Management and Budget (OMB) as prescribed by the Act, and will go into effect upon announcement in the Federal Register of OMB approval. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4, 10, 201-202, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934 as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 1-4, 10, 201-02, and 254, and section 1.3 and 1.103 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 1.103, this THIRD ORDER ON RECONSIDERATION is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Part 54 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. Part 54, IS AMENDED as set forth in Appendix A hereto, effective 30 days after their publication in the Federal Register. The collections of information are contingent upon
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-113A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-113A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-113A1.txt
      • ANIK F1 Permitted List Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 16368 � 7. See Amendment of the Commission's Space Station Licensing Rules and Policies, First Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 10760, 10839-10846 �� 209-225 (2003), Erratum, DA 03-2087 (rel. June 26, 2003), Second Erratum, DA 03-2861 (rel. Sept. 10, 2003). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Spectrum Policy Task Force Report at 12. 47 U.S.C. �� 309(j)(3)(A)-(D). See generally Policy Statement at �� 11-12. At the same time, our efforts to promote secondary market mechanisms do not preclude us from exploring unlicensed operations as a means of facilitating access to spectrum by new technologies. See, e.g., In the Matter of Additional Spectrum for Unlicensed Devices Below
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-113A1_Erratum.doc
      • ANIK F1 Permitted List Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 16368 � 7. See Amendment of the Commission's Space Station Licensing Rules and Policies, First Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 10760, 10839-10846 �� 209-225 (2003), Erratum, DA 03-2087 (rel. June 26, 2003), Second Erratum, DA 03-2861 (rel. Sept. 10, 2003). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Spectrum Policy Task Force Report at 12. 47 U.S.C. �� 309(j)(3)(A)-(D). See generally Policy Statement at �� 11-12. At the same time, our efforts to promote secondary market mechanisms do not preclude us from exploring unlicensed operations as a means of facilitating access to spectrum by new technologies. See, e.g., In the Matter of Additional Spectrum for Unlicensed Devices Below
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-114A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-114A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-114A1.txt
      • the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 52.19(c) the petition filed by the Connecticut Department of Public Utility Control, is CONDITIONALLY GRANTED AS MODIFIED HEREIN upon the submission of additional information by the Connecticut Department and the approval of such information by the Wireline Competition Bureau, as discussed herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to the authority contained in Sections 1.3 and 52.19(c) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 52.19(c), and the delegated authority in sections 0.91 and 0.291, of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291 that the Connecticut Department of Public Utility Control's Request for Temporary Waiver of 47 C.F.R. Section 52.19(c)(3)(ii) is GRANTED for a period of six months from the date of implementation of
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-127A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-127A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-127A1.txt
      • caps were interfering with the marketplace's creation of incentives regarding choice of technology. Our basis for choosing to move to a case-by-case analysis in that context simply does not apply in the context of broadcast rules. WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (setting out criteria for waivers of Commission rules); see also 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See 47 U.S.C.� 309(d). A petition must contain specific allegations of fact sufficient to show that (1) the petitioner is a party in interest, (2) a grant of the application would be prima facie inconsistent with the public interest, and (3) a substantial and material question is presented to be determined by the Commission. Sanders Bros, 309 U.S. at 477;
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-133A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-133A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-133A1.txt
      • 7; Sprint Reply at 2. APCO Comments, CC Docket No. 94-102 (January 24, 2003) (APCO Comments). APCO Comments at 5. APCO Comments at 2. APCO Comments at 3. Id. APCO Comments at 3, 4. Sprint Reply Comments at 3 . Sprint Reply Comments at 3-4. Sprint Reply Comments at 4. Id. Sprint Reply Comments at 5. Id. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D. C. Cir. 1990) (citing WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D. C. Cir. 1969)). Revision of the Commission's Rules to Ensure Compatibility with Enhanced 911 Emergency Calling Systems, CC Docket No. 94-102, Fourth Memorandum Opinion and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 17442, 17457-58, paras. 43-44 (2000) (E911 Fourth
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-136A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-136A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-136A1.txt
      • 38.9 42.0 2.1 8.0% Standard error 1.2 1.2 0.8 0.8 Total of above 59.9 62.9 2.9 4.8% 58.9 62.7 3.8 6.5% Standard error 1.6 1.6 1.0 1.0 Other Analog Channels Other Analog�� 9.2 7.4 -1.9 -20.4% 9.8 7.4 -2.4 -24.5% Standard error 0.9 0.8 0.9 0.8 Total analog 69.2 70.3 1.1 1.6% 68.7 70.1 1.4 2.0% Standard error 2.0 1.9 1.3 1.3 � Excluding music and other non-video channels. �� Includes premium, pay-per-view, and mini-tiers. Statement of Commissioner Michael J. Copps, Dissenting Re: Implementation of Section 3 of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992. I respectfully dissent from today's Report on cable rates. At a time of significant increases in cable rates year after year, consumers deserve
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-140A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-140A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-140A1.txt
      • from stockpiling excessive inventories and helps ensure that carriers optimize the use of existing numbering resources. Due in part to these measures, the projected life of the NANP has been significantly extended. Even CTIA lauds the success of these measures. Furthermore, the Pennsylvania Commission submits that forbearance from increasing the utilization threshold could result in the unnecessary stranding of over 1.3 million individual telephone numbers in Pennsylvania's NPAs. Thus, we find that the Commission's numbering resources utilization threshold and its scheduled increases are necessary to ensure that carrier practices with regard to numbering resources are not unjust or unreasonable. We also disagree with CTIA's suggestion that scheduled increases are rendered unnecessary by the Commission's already existing authority under sections 201 and
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-141A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-141A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-141A1.txt
      • 2003 and on less than 30-days publication in the Federal Register. Absent this early effectiveness, all of the burdens described above would result. 5. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 5(c), 201, 202 and 220 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), 201, 202, and 220, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, sections 553(b) and 553(d)(3) of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. � 553(b), 553(d)(3), implementation of certain rule modifications described in paragraph 2, above IS SUSPENDED from July 1, 2003 until January 1, 2004. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Federal-State Joint Conference on Accounting Issues, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 17025
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-14A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-14A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-14A1.txt
      • to potential interference to a Cuban broadcast station. Kesselman did not object to the September 9, 1999, construction deadline at the time the WIJR permit was issued. 47 C.F.R. � 73.3598(b). See generally, 47 C.F.R. � 1.106(b)(2). 47 C.F.R. �1.115(b)(2)(i)-(v). Wendell & Associates, 17 FCC Rcd 18576, 18577 (2002) (``Wendell''). See also 47 C.F.R. � 73.3598(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (``WAIT Radio''), citing Rio Grande Family Radio Fellowship Inc. v. FCC, 406 F.2d 664 (D.C. Cir. 1968). WAIT Radio,418 F.2d at 1157. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe, 401 U.S. 402, 416 (1971). Streamlining MO&O, 14 FCC Rcd at 17541. See 47 C.F.R. �� 73.3534(d) and 73.3535(c)
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-150A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-150A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-150A1.txt
      • 2003) ; T-Mobile, T-Zones Pricing (visited Jan. 24, 2003) ; Cingular Wireless, Wireless Internet Pricing (visited Jan. 23, 2003) . Sprint PCS's monthly mobile data plan is called Vision. Sprint PCS Vision, How Can I Use It? (visited Jan. 28, 2003) ; Sprint PCS, PCS Service Plans: Select Your Plan (visited Jan. 28, 2003) . Sprint PCS was serving 1.3 million Vision customers as of the end of March 2003. Q1 2003 Sprint FON Group Earnings Conference Call - Final, FD (Fair Disclosure) Wire, Apr. 21, 2003 (Len Lauer, President of Sprint PCS). As discussed in the Seventh Report, smartphones are devices that combine the voice capabilities of mobile telephones with the data and personal information management functions of PDAs.
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A1.txt
      • geographic separation does not necessarily imply ``true'' adjacent sharing. The ``adjacent beam'' with which ATC sharing is feasible must have sufficient beam isolation for sharing with MSV's MSS operation to occur. See App. C2 at Tables 2.1.1.B and 2.1.1.D (summarizing the results of our calculations). See MSV Jan. 11, 2002 Ex Parte Letter at 22. See infra App. C2 � 1.3.5. See infra App. C2 at Table 2.1.1.B. It is emphasized that the percentages of increased noise do not take into account MSV's proposed use of variable rate vocoders. For the assumptions used in our analyses, see infra App. C2 � 1. See infra App. C2 at Table 2.1.1.B. See infra App. C2 at Table 2.1.1.D. It is again emphasized that
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A1_Erratum.doc
      • geographic separation does not necessarily imply ``true'' adjacent sharing. The ``adjacent beam'' with which ATC sharing is feasible must have sufficient beam isolation for sharing with MSV's MSS operation to occur. See App. C2 at Tables 2.1.1.B and 2.1.1.D (summarizing the results of our calculations). See MSV Jan. 11, 2002 Ex Parte Letter at 22. See infra App. C2 � 1.3.5. See infra App. C2 at Table 2.1.1.B. It is emphasized that the percentages of increased noise do not take into account MSV's proposed use of variable rate vocoders. For the assumptions used in our analyses, see infra App. C2 � 1. See infra App. C2 at Table 2.1.1.B. See infra App. C2 at Table 2.1.1.D. It is again emphasized that
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A4.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A4.txt
      • and body blockage is approximately 2-4 dB. The actual dynamic range of the power control system is expected to be greater than the sum of the individual attenuation factors. We use a 10 dB power control factor for MT transmissions in our analysis of 2 GHz ATC operations. A more detailed discussion of these factors is provided in Appendix C2 1.3. 1.2.3 Frequency Polarization Isolation Some frequency polarization isolation will exist between a transmitter and receiver using different polarization schemes. In comments submitted with regard to this proceeding Inmarsat references a value of 1.4 dB for polarization isolation for all cases of linear to circular, non-identical polarization mismatch between a PCS-like transmitter and a satellite transmitter. MSV argued that when considering
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A4_Erratum.doc
      • and body blockage is approximately 2-4 dB. The actual dynamic range of the power control system is expected to be greater than the sum of the individual attenuation factors. We use a 10 dB power control factor for MT transmissions in our analysis of 2 GHz ATC operations. A more detailed discussion of these factors is provided in Appendix C2 1.3. 1.2.3 Frequency Polarization Isolation Some frequency polarization isolation will exist between a transmitter and receiver using different polarization schemes. In comments submitted with regard to this proceeding Inmarsat references a value of 1.4 dB for polarization isolation for all cases of linear to circular, non-identical polarization mismatch between a PCS-like transmitter and a satellite transmitter. MSV argued that when considering
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-190A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-190A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-190A1.txt
      • and Baudot formats. Further, a commenter asserts that we should permit captioned telephone CAs to interrupt the conversation to ask the speaker to slow down if the captioned text is lagging too far behind the conversation. In analyzing the applicability of our TRS mandatory minimum standards to captioned telephone service, we consider established legal standards for waiver pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules. The Commission will adhere strictly to its rules unless a party can demonstrate that ``in the public interest the rule should be waived.'' Furthermore, the Commission may only waive a provision of its rules for ``good cause shown.'' The Commission must take a ``hard look'' at applications for waiver and consider all relevant factors when determining
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-196A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-196A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-196A1.txt
      • analyzed, as discussed in the California Commission's initial filing. We hereby grant the California Commission's motion to accept this supplemental data into the record in this proceeding. ORdering CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 3, 4, 201-205 and 251 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 153, 154, 201-205, 254, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 that the Petition for Waiver filed by the California Public Utilities Commission and the People of the State of California on September 5, 2002, IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, as discussed in this Order. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Accept Supplemental Data filed by the California
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-201A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-201A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-201A1.txt
      • under Section 1.925 ``must be filed on FCC Form 601, 603, or 605,'' and must be accompanied by a $145.00 fee. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.925(a), 1.925(b), 1.1102. Delta did not file its waiver request on one of those forms, nor did it pay a fee. The Media Bureau has no rules-based waiver standard corresponding to 47 C.F.R. � 1.925. Section 1.3 of the Rules (47 C.F.R. � 1.3), under Part 1 - Practice and Procedure, states that rule provisions may be waived ``for good cause shown,'' and 47 C.F.R. � 73.3566(a), under Part 73 - Radio Broadcast Services, Subpart H - Rules Applicable to All Broadcast Stations, provides that requests for waiver ``shall show the nature of the waiver or exception
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-217A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-217A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-217A1.txt
      • - The privatized successor entities and separated entities of INTELSAT and Inmarsat shall conduct an initial public offering . . . to achieve such independence. Such offerings shall substantially dilute the aggregate ownership of such entities by such signatories or former signatories.'' The Commission's rules may be waived if there is good cause to do so, see 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, but, for the reasons discussed herein, we affirm that no waiver is warranted here. See infra, paras. 21-22. It should be noted that Intelsat has not claimed that the same factors justifying extension of the IPO deadline also justify milestone extensions, and, in fact, recently surrendered an authorization for a satellite contemporaneously with the satellite's milestone for construction completion. See
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-228A4.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-228A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-228A4.txt
      • Michigan Bell explained that it had elected to invoke the rate structure set out in the ISP Remand Order, and the rate structure change would be effective in Michigan on July 6, 2003. This rate change occurred after comments were filed on Michigan Bell's supplemental application. Complete-As-Filed Waiver. We waive the complete-as-filed requirement on our own motion pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules to the limited extent necessary to consider Michigan Bell's revised reciprocal compensation rates. The Commission maintains certain procedural requirements governing section 271 applications. In particular, the ``complete-as-filed'' requirement provides that when an applicant files new information after the comment date, the Commission reserves the right to start the 90-day review period again or to accord such
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-237A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-237A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-237A1.txt
      • Portability Technical, Operational, and Implementation Requirements Phase II, CC Docket No. 95-116 (filed Sept. 26, 2000); ATIS Operations and Billing Forum, Wireless Intercarrier Communications: Interface Specification for Local Number Portability, Version 2, at � 2 p. 6 (Jan. 2003). May 13th Petition at 16-23. Ex Parte Presentation of the Rural Wireless Working Group Re: Rural Wireless Number Portability Guidelines, Section 1.3, (filed Aug. 25, 2003) (Rural Wireless Working Group Filing). Letter from Diane Cornell, CTIA to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC (filed Aug. 26, 2003). Letter from John T. Scott, III, Verizon Wireless to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, CC Docket No. 95-116 (filed May 20, 2003). Id. at 2. Id. at 1. Letter from John B. Muleta, Chief, Wireless Telecommunications
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-240A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-240A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-240A1.txt
      • the Division found that North Dakota's Block 6 certification page was filed outside the filing window, it determined that it was not necessary to consider whether the Item 21 attachments were timely filed. See Division Order. Id. at para. 7. Id. at para. 8. Id. at paras. 9-13. Application for Review. Id. Request for Review at 1. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972); Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1159. Application for Review. To the extent North Dakota is suggesting that this was the first year FCC Form
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-241A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-241A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-241A1.txt
      • contrary to the public interest. The good cause standard, as applied in the E911 waiver context, is discussed further in Section III C below, which discusses generally the showing expected to demonstrate good cause for a grant of waiver relief. For the foregoing reasons, with respect to a Tier III carrier who has petitioned for temporary waiver pursuant to sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the rules that is beyond the deadlines set forth in the Non-Nationwide Carriers Order, we stay the application of sections 20.18(d), (e), (f), (g), and/or (h) until we rule on that carrier's waiver petition or six months from the release date of this Order, whichever is sooner. We will not act on these waiver petitions until at
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-241A1_Erratum.doc
      • contrary to the public interest. The good cause standard, as applied in the E911 waiver context, is discussed further in Section III C below, which discusses generally the showing expected to demonstrate good cause for a grant of waiver relief. For the foregoing reasons, with respect to a Tier III carrier who has petitioned for temporary waiver pursuant to sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the rules that is beyond the deadlines set forth in the Non-Nationwide Carriers Order, we stay the application of sections 20.18(d), (e), (f), (g), and/or (h) until we rule on that carrier's waiver petition or six months from the release date of this Order, whichever is sooner. We will not act on these waiver petitions until at
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-242A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-242A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-242A1.txt
      • raises compliance problems for its underlying carrier partners. Therefore, we conclude in this instance that a waiver of the E911 Phase II equipment activation rules to exempt OnStar analog and first generation digital telematics units for a limited period is an appropriate relief and is consistent with the Commission's prior waiver orders. Consequently, on our own motion, pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, we grant wireless carriers a waiver of the Commission's E911 Phase II rules, including the particular equipment activation requirements of Section 20.18(g), with regard to the OnStar telematics units until December 31, 2005, and as conditioned below. We also emphasize that the waiver applies only to OnStar telematics units that have the capability to enable OnStar's
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-249A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-249A1.pdf
      • 2000 are DENIED, and the Petition for Reconsideration of the Ninth Report and Order and Eighteenth Order on Reconsideration filed by SBC Communications Inc. on January 3, 2000 is DENIED in part and DISMISSED AS MOOT in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �154(i), and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �1.3, the Petition for Waiver of Section 36.631 of the Commission's Rules Governing the Universal Service Fund, filed by the Vermont Department of Public Service and the Vermont Public Service Board, September 21, 1993, AAD 93-103, is DISMISSED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Commission's Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau, Reference Information
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-268A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-268A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-268A1.txt
      • FCC Rcd 7125 (1990), HarryCo's loss of financing after refusal of its creditors to meet a lender requirement would be viewed as HarryCo's own inability to meet its loan commitment rather than as an external event beyond its control. Letter from Chief, Audio Division, to John F. Garziglia, Esq., Ref. No. 1800B3-KDY (M.M.B. Aug. 30, 1996). Id. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972). For example, Southern provides an affidavit from Southern's president, which describes the ways in which the station's issue-responsive programming addresses the needs and interests of Semora residents, as well as those of Caswell County, North Carolina, in which Semora is located. It also
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-284A1.txt
      • local number portability at this time are likely to be better addressed in the context of Section 208 formal compliant proceedings or related mediations as opposed to FCC-initiated forfeiture proceedings. In this connection, we note that a violation of our number portability rules would constitute an unjust and unreasonable practice under section 201(b) of the Act. . 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, 52.25(e). See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1158 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972). See e.g., Franklin Telephone Company, Inc. Petition for Waiver, CC Docket Nos. 95-116 (filed Sept. 24, 2003); Intercommunity Telephone Company, LLC Petition for Waiver, CC Docket No. 95-116 (filed Sept. 24, 2003); and North Central Telephone Cooperative, Inc. Petition for
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-313A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-313A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-313A1.txt
      • Review of Albuquerque School District, Albuquerque, New Mexico, filed May 23, 2003; and Request for Review of International Business Machines, Inc., on behalf of Albuquerque School District, Albuquerque, New Mexico, filed May 23, 2003. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1-4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-54 and 254, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that the Funding Year 2002 filing window deadline established by the Schools and Libraries Division of the Universal Service Administrative Company pursuant to section 54.507(c) of the Commission's rules IS WAIVED for the affected applicants listed in the Appendix of this Order, and the Schools and Libraries Division shall take the steps
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-325A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-325A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-325A1.txt
      • on less than 30 days' publication in the Federal Register. Absent this early effectiveness, all of the burdens described above would result. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 5(c), 201, 202, 219 and 220 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), 201, 202, 219 and 220, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, sections 553(b) and 553(d)(3) of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. � 553(b), 553(d)(3), implementation of certain rule modifications described in paragraph 2, above, IS SUSPENDED from January 1, 2004 through June 30, 2004. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Federal-State Joint Conference on Accounting Issues, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 17025
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-328A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-328A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-328A1.txt
      • retransmission consent and, given the variation in terms of RSN contracts, should give the Commission sufficient experience and data to evaluate the success and continued need for the condition. 47 U.S.C � 307(b). See Letter from William M. Wiltshire, counsel for News Corp., to Marlene H. Dortch (Sept. 22, 2003) (``Applicants' Sept. 22 Ex Parte'') at 2. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See Rules and Policies on Foreign Participation in the U.S. Telecommunications Market, 12 FCC Rcd 23894 (1997); Order on Reconsideration, 15 FCC Rcd 18158 (2000). See Petition to Adopt Conditions to Authorizations and Licenses (filed Nov. 25, 2003) (``Petition to Adopt Conditions''). See Petition to Adopt Conditions at Appendix E, Exhibit 1 (Hughes By-Laws Amendment), Exhibit 2 (Proposed Resolutions) and
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-330A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-330A1.txt
      • TELEVISON SERVICE OFFERINGS By year end 2004, DirecTV must provide local broadcast channels to subscribers in an additional 30 designated market areas (``DMAs'') beyond what had been previously funded, projected or planned by Hughes/DirecTV. In the event that circumstances beyond DirecTV's control limit its ability to fulfill this license condition, DirecTV may petition the Commission for waiver pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. VII. CONDITIONS TO MITIGATE NATIONAL SECURITY, LAW ENFORCEMENT, FOREIGN POLICY AND TRADE POLICY CONCERNS Pursuant to the request of the U.S. Department of Justice (``DOJ'') and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (``FBI''), with the concurrence of the Department of Homeland Security (``DHS''), the transfer of control is conditioned on: GM causing Hughes
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-337A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-337A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-337A1.txt
      • same basis as that used for intertoll TWX circuits. The special circuit equipment cost assigned to telegraph grade and other private line services is directly assigned to the appropriate operations. **** 5. Section 36.142 is proposed to be revised as follows: Section 36.142 Categories and apportionment procedures. (a) Other Information Origination/Termination Equipment-Category 1. This category includes . . . subcategory 1.3 Exchange Line C&WF. If amounts of coinless pay telephone equipment are substantial, the cost of such equipment should be separately identified and allocated on the basis of relative toll minutes-of-use for interxchange carriers and minutes-of-use for exchange carriers. **** 6. Section 36.152 is proposed to be revised as follows: Section 36.152 Categories of Cable and Wire Facilities (C&WF). (a) ****
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-33A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-33A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-33A1.txt
      • minimize the potential effect of other, non-UWB sources of interference on SDARS service, noting that Part 27 WCS stations must reduce their emissions that appear in the SDARS bands to -80 dBm, but fail to point out that certain fixed, land, and radiolocation stations in the WCS service are allowed to have emissions in the SDARS bands at -50 dBm, 1.3 dB more than allowed for indoor UWB devices. Further, it says that the number cited by Sirius and XM for terrestrial stations at the U.S.-Mexican border of -154 dBW/m2/4 kHz is the limit that U.S. stations must meet, adding that the requirements for Mexican stations, depending on frequency, are -150 and -145.5 dBW/m2/4 kHz for terrestrial stations and -130.5 dBW/m2/4
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-36A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-36A1.pdf
      • BOCs state that they provided 19.5 million special access lines in 1996, growing to 78.6 million lines in 2001. BOC provisioning of fiber and high-capacity loops to end-user customers' premises significantly increased in recent years. Total BOC reported DS1s terminating at customer premises increased over four fold from fewer than 300,000 in 1996, to over 600,000 by 1999 and almost 1.3 million in 2001. BOC reported fiber terminated to customers' premises more than doubled between 1996 and 2001, from just under 1 million to over 2 million lines. To meet the business demands of enterprise customers, competitive carriers must meet more stringent design and operational standards with higher capacity and more reliability. Specifically, enterprise customers demand several different kinds of packet
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-3A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-3A2.txt
      • framework for the set of documents to be submitted to the FCC including recommendations to be implemented as regulations and, as necessary, to Congress for appropriate implementation. Some of the elements of this understanding are private sector undertakings. 1.2. No conditions or obligations will be placed on the Parties except for those which are explicitly called for in this MOU. 1.3. This MOU constitutes a system that necessarily relies on all its parts to provide consumers with solutions to cable and CE issues affecting digital television. Should any part of this MOU not be implemented as proposed, or if additional obligations are imposed on a Party, each of the Parties reserves its right to withdraw support for any implementation. 1.4. This
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-46A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-46A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-46A1.txt
      • from Gary Warren, Hamilton Relay Inc., to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, dated January 12, 2003; Ex Parte letter from Karen Peltz Strauss, CSD Consultant, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, dated December 5, 2002. See Sprint ex parte letter dated November 18, 2002. FPC v Texaco, Inc., 377 U.S. 33, 39 (1964). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. FPC v Texaco, Inc., 377 U.S. 33, 39 (1964) Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc., v. Volpe, 401 U.S. 402, 416 (1971). WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969). Northeast Cellular Telephone Company, L.P v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; Part 68 Waiver Request of Alameda Engineering Inc.,
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-47A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-47A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-47A1.txt
      • and that any further relaxation of this policy ``would be inconsistent with the role of FM translators as a secondary service not intended to supplement the services provided by radio broadcasters.'' Translator R&O, 5 FCC Rcd at 7221. The Commission imposed this restriction to promote the establishment of full service FM broadcast stations. Id. at 7215. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (``WAIT Radio''). See Northeast Cellular Telephone Company, L.P., et al., v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (``Northeast Cellular''); see also WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1157, 1159; Capital Cities/ABC, Inc., ET. al., 11 FCC Rcd 5841, 5872-73, 5898 (1996). See Translator R&O, 5 FCC
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-58A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-58A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-58A1.txt
      • 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154, 201-202, 254, and 405 and section 1.108 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.108, this ORDER AND ORDER ON RECONSIDERATION is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 254 and 405 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 254, and 405, and sections 1.3, 1.429 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.429, that the Verizon, SBC, and BellSouth Joint Petition for Interim Waiver and the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., National Telecommunications Cooperative Association, Organization for the Promotion and Advancement of Small Telecommunications Companies Joint Petition for Interim Waiver are GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-70A1.txt
      • to Petition for Reconsideration, filed by Hill & Welch and Myers Keller Communications Law Group on December 18, 2000. Reconsideration Order, 16 FCC Rcd. 9485. Reconsideration Order, 16 FCC Rcd. at 9490, �9 (citing Zimsky, 9 FCC Rcd. at 3239-41; Common Fund Order, 15 FCC Rcd. at 20437, �10). Reconsideration Order, 16 FCC Rcd. at 9490, �9. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (Providing the Commission with the authority to grant waivers ``if good cause therefore is shown.''); 47 C.F.R. � 1.925 (``The Commission may grant a waiver request if: (i) the underlying purpose of the rule(s) would not be served or would be frustrated by application to the instant case, and that a grant of the requested waiver would be in the
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-112A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-112A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-112A1.txt
      • anticompetitive behavior of the six Philippine carriers cutting off circuits in an attempt to force U.S. carriers to agree an increase in previously negotiated rates. Waiver request. ABS-CBN argues that the Bureau's March 10, 2003 Order was arbitrary and capricious because it ignored ABS-CBN's waiver request. We find that there was no specific waiver request submitted by ABS-CBN. Under Section 1.3 of our rules, ``[w]aiver of the Commission's rules is appropriate only if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule. Such deviation must serve the public interest and be consistent with the policies underlying the rule.'' We find that, while ABS-CBN made a general argument that action taken by the Commission should be tailored narrowly to exclude any U.S.
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-123A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-123A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-123A1.txt
      • not add to the relocation costs for FSS licensees. . .''). But see 47 C.F.R. � 101.83 (2003) (noting that certain ``stations that remain co-primary [in the 18.3-19.3 GHz band] may not make modifications to their systems that increase interference to satellite earth stations, or result in a facility that would be more costly to relocate''). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (2003) (``Any provision of the rules may be waived by the Commission on its own motion or by petition if good cause therefor is shown.''); see also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (1969) (a waiver is appropriate only if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule and such deviation will serve the public interest). See,
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-12A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-12A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-12A1.txt
      • Telephone and Telecommunications Alliance, the National Telecommunications Cooperation Association, and the Organization for the Promotion and Advancement of Small Telecommunications Companies, filed on November 21, 2003 (Joint Petition) at 22. See Appendix A. Sprint and Nextel Communications, Inc. opposed the Joint Petition. See Appendix B Joint Petition at 4, 7, 12. Id. at 4. Id. at 7-11. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972) (WAIT Radio). Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (Northeast Cellular). WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1159; Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1157. Id. at 1159. See, e.g., MoKan Petition at 4;
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-130A1.txt
      • Docket No. 02-54 (filed July 17, 2002). Response of the University of Mississippi National Remote Sensing and Space Law Center to Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, IB Docket No. 02-54 (filed July 16, 2002). See 5 U.S.C. � 601(6) (``small entity'' has same meaning as ``small business'' under RFA). See Second Report and Order at paras. 89-92. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See Second Report and Order at Section III.D.4.i. 5 U.S.C. � 603(b)(3). Id. � 601(6). 5 U.S.C. � 601(3) (incorporating by reference the definition of "small business concern" in 15 U.S.C. � 632). Pursuant to the RFA, the statutory definition of a small business applies "unless an agency, after consultation with the Office of Advocacy of the Small Business Administration
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-131A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-131A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-131A1.txt
      • to hold the licenses past the one-year deadline for as long as it would take to resolve any issues presented by their last-minute assignment or transfer-of-control applications. Such a precedent would also tend to encourage speculative filings by applicants with no reasonable prospect or intention of constructing a system. Constellation/MCHI Milestone Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 1102 � 20. Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules provides that waiver of a rule may be granted upon "good cause shown." 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. However, as noted by the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, agency rules are presumed valid, and "an applicant for waiver faces a high hurdle even at the starting gate." WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-133A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-133A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-133A1.txt
      • C.F.R.�63.13 International Special Project (ISP) -Amendments ISP-AMD Amendment of an ISP-PDR to correct information required for the processing of the original Petition for Declaratory Ruling. See e.g., 47 U.S.C.� 310(b)(4); 47 C.F.R.�1.2 47 C.F.R.�63.13. International Special Project ISP -- Other Filings TBD Request to waive the Commission's rules for international common carriers (other than waiver of the international settlements policy). �1.3 DATA NETWORK IDENTIFICATION CODE Data Network Identification Codes (DNC) -- Other Filings TBD Notification of miscellaneous items. Data Network Identification Codes (DNC) -- Code Re-Assignment TBD Request for reassignment of the DNC when one company acquires the packet-switched operations of another company, or when a company reorganizes. R&O in Docket 83-1230 104 FCC 2d 208, 7378-80 paras, 70-77 (1986), recon.
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-137A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-137A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-137A1.txt
      • should be a mandatory type of TRS has only recently been raised, and therefore it would be premature to address it at this time. We seek comment on that issue in the FNPRM below. See 47 C.F.R. � 64.604. See Improved TRS Order & FNPRM at � 39. FPC v Texaco, Inc., 377 U.S. 33, 39 (1964). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe, 401 U.S. 402, 416 (1971). WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969). Northeast Cellular Telephone Company, L.P. v FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; Part 68 Waiver Request of Alameda Engineering, Inc., Order, 10 FCC Rcd 12135, 12139 (Sept. 28, 1995).
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-140A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-140A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-140A1.txt
      • (1998) (``We do not believe the public interest is best served by allowing the only broadcast station assigned to Caldwell to provide the requisite 70 dBu signal to less than the entire community of license.''). See Letter to James Withers (MB Oct. 21, 2003) (For commercial FM - 3.16mV/m with 1.0 mV/m contour). Pacific Petition at 7. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. For instance, Pacific argues that the public interest would be served by deleting the condition specified in both the Taft allocation and construction permit in order to permit STA operations from the Taft site; that the Taft facilities would cover a greater population, noting that all but approximately 1,000 of the listeners served by KTKY(FM)'s Refugio facilities would receive a
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-144A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-144A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-144A1.txt
      • Rcd 22337. TMI Milestone Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 1730 �12. United States Satellite Broadcasting Company, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 7 FCC Rcd 7247, 7250 � 17 (Mass Media Bur. 1992). Volunteers in Technical Assistance, Order, 12 FCC Rcd 3094 (Int'l Bur. 1997) (``VITA''). DISCO II Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 24168 �173 and 24173 n.358. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990) ("Northeast Cellular"). WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969); Dominion Video Satellite, Inc., Order and Authorization, 14 FCC Rcd 8182 (Int'l Bur. 1999). TMI claims that Canadian law requires a minimum of 80 percent Canadian ownership of Canadian licensees. See TMI Milestone Order, 18 FCC
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-149A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-149A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-149A1.txt
      • 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 154(j), 201-205, 215 and 218-220, FCC Report 43-07, the Infrastructure Report, IS REVISED as set forth above. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 5(c), 201, 202, 219 and 220 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), 201, 202, 219 and 220, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and sections 553(b) and 553(d)(3) of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. �� 553(b), 553(d)(3), implementation of certain rule modifications described in paragraph 3, above, IS SUSPENDED from July 1, 2004 through December 31, 2004. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to the authority contained in section 0.291 of the Commission's rules,
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-170A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-170A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-170A1.txt
      • request and asked that the Commission extend the waiver to all similarly situated carriers. No other party submitted comments in response to the petitions for waiver. Discussion As discussed below, we grant, in part, Petitioners' request for waiver of the Commission's universal service true-up procedures for 2003 and conclude that Petitioners have demonstrated good cause to justify the waiver. Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules provides that waiver of a rule may be granted upon ``good cause shown.'' Commission rules are presumed valid, however, and an applicant for waiver bears a heavy burden. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule ``only if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule and such deviation will serve the public
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-174A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-174A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-174A1.txt
      • Information Bureau, Reference Information Center, SHALL SEND a copy of this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, including the Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 2, 4(i), 4(j), and 201-205 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 152, 154(i), 154(j), 201-205 and 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the Joint Petition for Expedited Waiver IS GRANTED to the extent stated herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary APPENDIX LIST OF COMMENTERS Petition for Rulemaking: Comments ALLTEL Communications, Inc. GVNW Consulting, Inc. (GVNW) National Telecommunications Cooperative Association (NTCA) Organization for the
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-190A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-190A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-190A1.txt
      • Accounting Office, Government Auditing Standards: 2003 Revision, GAO-03-673G, �� 6.01, 6.05 (Jun. 2003) (``GAGAS Handbook'') (specifying differences between government auditing standards and private sector auditing standards for certain audits). In this regard, we recognize that there may be mitigating circumstances which warrant waiver of a rule. The Commission's rules may be waived when good cause is demonstrated. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972). The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (1990). In doing so, we may take into account,
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-208A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-208A1.txt
      • implementation of BPL remain, the technology has the potential to take advantage of the large-scale deployed infrastructure of the power grid to provide broadband services to some customers not yet served by DSL or cable modem services. Satellite Technologies High-speed Internet access over satellite remains a nas- cent technology. As of December 2003, satellite and wireless technology accounted for approximately 1.3 percent of total high-speed lines in the United States. Moreover, none of the satellite-based Internet access services satisfy the Commission's definition of advanced services, which calls for a minimum trans- mission speed of 200 kpbs downstream and upstream. As of mid-year 2003, the two major providers of high-speed Internet access through two-way satellite technology, DirecWay, an affiliate of Hughes Network
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-214A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-214A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-214A1.txt
      • 201, 206-208, and 258, and sections 1.421 and 1.429 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.421 and 1.429, that this Fifth Order on Reconsideration in CC Docket No. 94-129 IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), and 4(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), and 154(j), and sections 1.3, 1.43, and 1.429 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.43, and 1.429, that the petitions for waiver, emergency partial stay, and reconsideration filed by the LEC Petitioners, LEC Commenters, TDS Telecom and the Nebraska LECs ARE DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), and 4(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-222A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-222A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-222A1.txt
      • its content meets applicable standards and guidelines.''). See 36 C.F.R. Part 61, Appendix A (providing professional standards for the fields of history, archeology, architectural history, architecture, historic architecture). California SHPO Comments at 1; Georgia SHPO Comments at 1-2; Idaho SHPO Comments at 1. Cf. � 81, supra (use of experts unnecessary to establish objectively defined exclusions). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (permitting waiver of rules ``for good cause shown''). Idaho SHPO Comments at 2. We note that ``Indian tribes and Native Hawaiian organizations possess special expertise in assessing the eligibility of historic properties that may possess religious and cultural significance to them.'' 36 C.F.R. � 800.4(c)(1). Notice, 18 FCC Rcd at 11690-11693. See 36 C.F.R. �� 800.6, 800.7. See, e.g., American
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-222A1_Erratum.doc
      • its content meets applicable standards and guidelines.''). See 36 C.F.R. Part 61, Appendix A (providing professional standards for the fields of history, archeology, architectural history, architecture, historic architecture). California SHPO Comments at 1; Georgia SHPO Comments at 1-2; Idaho SHPO Comments at 1. Cf. � 81, supra (use of experts unnecessary to establish objectively defined exclusions). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (permitting waiver of rules ``for good cause shown''). Idaho SHPO Comments at 2. We note that ``Indian tribes and Native Hawaiian organizations possess special expertise in assessing the eligibility of historic properties that may possess religious and cultural significance to them.'' 36 C.F.R. � 800.4(c)(1). Notice, 18 FCC Rcd at 11690-11693. See 36 C.F.R. �� 800.6, 800.7. See, e.g., American
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-227A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-227A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-227A1.txt
      • WAIT Radio v. FCC , 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied 409 U.S. 1027 (1972). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.106(c). As indicated above, KRI initially requested tolling, not a waiver, based on KRI's lawsuit against the County. Texas Grace Communications, 16 FCC Rcd at 19171 (citing Streamlining MO&O, 14 FCC Rcd at 17541). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (Commission will not waive the rules absent a showing of good cause). Contrary to KRI's argument, the permit was not encumbered by ``administrative review.'' For tolling-related purposes, our rules define administrative review as consideration of ``petitions for reconsideration and applications for review of the grant of a construction permit.'' 47 C.F.R. � 73.3598(b)(ii). KRI alleges something quite different: a petition
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-249A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-249A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-249A1.txt
      • ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 1.106 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.106, the petition for reconsideration filed by Verizon Wireless on July 19, 2004, is DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority granted in Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 1.3, 1.407, and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.407, 1.925, the petition for rulemaking and request for waiver filed by CTIA - The Wireless Association on July 8, 2004, is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, the request for waiver filed by Dobson Communications Corporation is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-254A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-254A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-254A1.txt
      • it happen. And choosing to ignore the Commission's own data does not help the weak analytical structure on which this decision is built. The facts are clear. This Commission's most recent report on high-speed services shows that the residential and small business market is a duopoly. Our data show that new satellite and wireless technologies-exciting though they are-together serve only 1.3 percent of this market. Broadband over powerline does not yet even register. Yet the majority chooses to ignore the Commission's statistics, preferring instead sweeping rhetoric about regulatory relief and broadband competition. One problem here is that the majority gets so carried away with its vision of the country's telecom future that they act like it is already here, that competition
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-254A4.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-254A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-254A4.txt
      • it happen. And choosing to ignore the Commission's own data does not help the weak analytical structure on which this decision is built. The facts are clear. This Commission's most recent report on high-speed services shows that the residential and small business market is a duopoly. Our data show that new satellite and wireless technologies-exciting though they are-together serve only 1.3 percent of this market. Broadband over powerline does not yet even register. Yet the majority chooses to ignore the Commission's statistics, preferring instead sweeping rhetoric about regulatory relief and broadband competition. One problem here is that the majority gets so carried away with its vision of the country's telecom future that they act like it is already here, that competition
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-257A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-257A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-257A1.txt
      • Glendale Electronics, Inc., Regarding the License of SMR Station WNGQ365, Santiago Peak and Mount Lukens, California, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 19 FCC Rcd 2540 (2004). See 2003 Petition at 8-9. See June Supplement at 1. See 2004 Order at � 6. See 2003 Order at 802 47 C.F.R. �� 1.946, 1.955(a)(2), 24.203. 47 C.F.R. � 1.925. Alternatively, pursuant to section 1.3, the Commission has authority to waive its rules if there is ``good cause'' to do so. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.946, 24.843. Section 1.946(e) also states specific circumstances that would not warrant an extension of time to complete construction. 47 C.F.R. � 1.946(e)(2)-(3).
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-261A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-261A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-261A1.txt
      • minor typographic errors in the Division decision. These typographic errors are of no decisional significance and therefore are harmless error. See North Florida MMDS Partners, 10 FCC Rcd 11593, 11599 n. 19 (1995), quoting Greater Boston Television Corp. v. FCC, 444 F.2d 841, 851 (D.C. Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 923, 91 S.Ct. 2233 (1971). See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 1.925. See WAMC, Inc., 10 FCC Rcd 12219 (1995) (denying an application for review raising essentially the same arguments as in a petition for reconsideration). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 04-261 Federal Communications Commission FCC 04-261 �@��� [ \ ^ | � � � \ h� gd� h� \ F S � tm \ �
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-266A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-266A1.txt
      • National Exchange Carrier Association, Fulfilling the Digital Dream: A report on the technology of small and rural telephone companies (2003) at 4, available at http://www.neca.org/media/2003AMS.pdf . 29 We note that entities serving a limited number of local telephone or broadband subscribers can seek waivers alleging that the burden of completing the Form 477 is unreasonably great. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. 30 See, e.g., NTCA Comments at 1-3, OPASTCO Comments at 2, 6. 31 See paras. 22-23, infra. 32 See, e.g., Fourth 706 Report at 14 (noting increased speeds of several cable modem services over the past year). 33 Some commenters argue that gathering data about broadband or high-speed services at speeds exceeding the current definition of broadband services (200 kbps)
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-27A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-27A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-27A1.txt
      • R 128 0 R]/Type/Pages/Parent 187 0 R>> endobj 190 0 obj<> endobj 191 0 obj<>stream xmlns:pdf='http://ns.adobe.com/pdf/1.3/' pdf:Producer='Acrobat Distiller 6.0 (Windows)'> 37 erratacstephen endstream endobj 192 0 obj<
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-27A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-27A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-27A2.txt
        • endobj 2 0 obj<>stream y(O))')) 9L �e�� endstream endobj 3 0 obj<>stream �4�E~ȴb�7�i I����S�wzg� -��� endstream endobj 4 0 obj<> endobj 5 0 obj<> endobj 6 0 obj<> endobj 7 0 obj<>stream xmlns:pdf='http://ns.adobe.com/pdf/1.3/' pdf:Producer='Acrobat Distiller 6.0 (Windows)'> 7 erratacstephen endstream endobj 8 0 obj<
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-27A3.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-27A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-27A3.txt
          • 0 obj<>stream endstream endobj 5 0 obj<>stream q--� � 9�I'���T(R)5 "-o �ȁW endstream endobj 6 0 obj<> endobj 7 0 obj<> endobj 8 0 obj<> endobj 9 0 obj<>stream xmlns:pdf='http://ns.adobe.com/pdf/1.3/' pdf:Producer='Acrobat Distiller 6.0 (Windows)'> 8 erratacstephen endstream endobj 10 0 obj<
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-27A4.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-27A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-27A4.txt
            • 419/Filter/FlateDecode>>stream s, ��o[BH$@�êH� �� ĝ�� endstream endobj 5 0 obj<>stream ' 1 ̳�� endstream endobj 6 0 obj<> endobj 7 0 obj<> endobj 8 0 obj<> endobj 9 0 obj<>stream xmlns:pdf='http://ns.adobe.com/pdf/1.3/' pdf:Producer='Acrobat Distiller 6.0 (Windows)'> 5 erratacstephen endstream endobj 10 0 obj<
            • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-27A5.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-27A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-27A5.txt
              • 1>> endobj 2 0 obj<>stream ���t� r��' endstream endobj 3 0 obj<>stream HH� ��Y-�- �S;g endstream endobj 4 0 obj<> endobj 5 0 obj<> endobj 6 0 obj<> endobj 7 0 obj<>stream xmlns:pdf='http://ns.adobe.com/pdf/1.3/' pdf:Producer='Acrobat Distiller 6.0 (Windows)'> 5 erratacstephen endstream endobj 8 0 obj<
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-27A6.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-27A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-27A6.txt
                • 8�T�``�s�/�A�A �`" �� "��� b��� endstream endobj 5 0 obj<>stream s}�<|kOã0�U= S(R) �{� endstream endobj 6 0 obj<> endobj 7 0 obj<> endobj 8 0 obj<> endobj 9 0 obj<>stream xmlns:pdf='http://ns.adobe.com/pdf/1.3/' pdf:Producer='Acrobat Distiller 6.0 (Windows)'> 4 erratacstephen endstream endobj 10 0 obj<
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-290A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-290A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-290A1.txt
                  • the state commission order with respect to UNE loop rates (when not ordered as part of the UNE platform). UNE-P arrangements no longer subject to unbundling shall be subject to true-up to the applicable transition rate upon the amendment of the relevant interconnection agreements, including any applicable change of law processes. See id. at 16799, para. 30. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See, e.g., MCI, MCI and Qwest Reach Commercial Agreement for Wholesale Services, Press Release (May 31, 2004), available at http://global.mci.com/news/news2.xml?newsid=10710&mode=long&lang=en&widt h=530&langlinks=off; SBC, SBC, Sage Telecom Reach Wholesale Telecom Services Agreement, Press Release (Apr. 3, 2004), available at http://www.sbc.com/gen/press-room?pid=5097&cdvn=news&newsarticleid=21080 . Triennial Review Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 17348-50, paras. 585-89. USTA II, 359 F.3d at 592-93. See BellSouth Comments at 37-38;
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-5A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-5A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-5A1.txt
                  • access to more than 250 hours of movies and allows the customer to control the content using full VCR-like functionality. Another example of VOD service is Cablevision's Interactive Optimum (``iO''), which is the first VOD service to make high-definition programming available to iO subscribers. High-Definition Television (``HDTV''). In 2001, Comcast announced the launch of an HDTV service to more than 1.3 million customers. Also in 2001, Time Warner agreed to carry the HDTV signals of broadcast television stations in its operating areas, and the HDTV versions of HBO and Showtime in certain areas. Today, cable operators are deploying HDTV nationwide. Over 60 million television households are passed by cable systems offering HDTV, including 83 of the top 100 designated market areas
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-67A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-67A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-67A1.txt
                  • for forbearance filed by BellSouth, SBC, and Verizon with respect to their international directory assistance services ARE GRANTED to the extent stated and subject to the conditions established herein, and otherwise ARE DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 10, and 201-205 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 160, 201-205, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that the petitions for waiver of the Computer III CEI requirements filed by BellSouth, SBC, and Verizon for the provision of international electronic reverse directory assistance services and international operator-assisted reverse directory assistance services ARE GRANTED to the extent stated and subject to the conditions established herein, and otherwise ARE DENIED. IT
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-69A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-69A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-69A1.txt
                  • infer an intent to deceive based on applicant's alleged motive to obtain favorable action on pending applications). Action regarding KM's construction at the wrong site is discussed infra, note 36. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3598(e). See 47 C.F.R. � 73.1690(b)(2). CMA's own initial survey was also wrong, which may suggest that the site presents survey difficulties. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; Northeast Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (``[W]aiver is appropriate . . . if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule and such deviation will serve the public interest.''); WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969). See 47 C.F.R. � 73.1350(a) (``Each licensee is responsible for maintaining and
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-86A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-86A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-86A1.txt
                  • Telephone to participate in NECA pools and tariffs and receive high-cost universal service support. This waiver does not affect Skyline Telephone's obligations under section 251 of the Act. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 154(j), and 254, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules IS GRANTED, as described herein, to Qwest Corporation, Verizon Northwest Inc., and M&L Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Skyline Telephone Company. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. ��
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-91A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-91A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-91A1.txt
                  • not satisfy the Commission's cost recovery standards for portability-related charges. See id. at 7. Were BellSouth to seek recovery of such costs through its intermodal tariff filing, they would be rejected. However, because BellSouth is not seeking to recover these costs from its own end-users, there is no danger of double recovery. , supra, and accompanying text. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See Northeast Cellular Telephone Company v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990); WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969). Cost Recovery Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 11777, para. 144. BellSouth Petition at 18-20. . WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1159. See CenturyTel Comments at 4-5; SBC Comments at 5 & n.17, 7-8; Sprint Comments
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-97A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-97A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-97A1.txt
                  • access charges that traditional long-distance carriers must pay.'' IP-Enabled Services, WC Docket No. 04-36, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 04-28 at para. 30 (citing Intercarrier Compensation, 16 FCC Rcd at 9657, para. 133). It is not clear whether or not this reference to ``IP telephony'' was intended to include phone-to-phone services that use IP in the backbone. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969). infra. AT&T Petition at 24; Global Crossing Comments at 6. AT&T Petition at 24; Global Crossing Comments at 4-5. 47 U.S.C. � 230(b)(2). AT&T Petition at 25; Americans for Tax Reform Comments at 1; Small Business Survival Committee Comments at 1; AT&T Reply at 19-23; ITAA Reply at 12-13.
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-122A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-122A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-122A1.txt
                  • Order, 17 FCC Rcd at 14844 �� 10-11. See, e.g., SHHH Comments at 7; Cingular Reply Comments at 2. See Cingular Reply Comments at 2. See Letter from Michael S. Bennet, counsel for RTG, and Joshua Zeldis, counsel for the TDMA Carriers, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, WT Docket No. 01-309 (filed May 27, 2005). See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925. See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969), appeal after remand, 459 F.2d 1203 (D.C. Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972); see also Northeast Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (a waiver of the Commission's rules may be granted in instances where the particular facts make strict compliance
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-12A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-12A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-12A1.txt
                  • compares averages on January 1, 2003 with those on January 1, 2004. Operating Capacity, Digital Programming, and Advanced Services As of January 1, 2004, the average cable system had a capacity of 734 MHz for the noncompetitive and competitive groups combined and for each of these groups individually. This represents a 7.3 percent increase over a 5-year period and a 1.3 percent increase over the previous year. Only 14 percent of subscribers were served by systems below 750 MHz, down from 54 percent on July 1, 1999. About 60 percent of subscribers were served by systems at 750 MHz, and 26 percent of subscribers were served by systems above 750 MHz, with most of those reporting a capacity of 870 MHz.
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-138A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-138A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-138A1.txt
                  • Merger Agreement also provides that licensee entities in which ALLTEL currently holds interests would remain directly and indirectly held by ALLTEL Communications, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of ALLTEL that would become a sister corporation of Wigeon. ALLTEL's existing licensee entities, therefore, would not be affected by the proposed transaction. As a result of the proposed merger, ALLTEL would add approximately 1.3 million domestic wireless customers in nineteen midwestern and western states that are contiguous to the its existing wireless properties, increasing the number of wireless customers served by ALLTEL to more than 10 million in 33 states. Furthermore, post-transaction, the combined service area of the Applicants would cover 72 million POPs, which is 25 percent of the United States population, in
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-13A1.txt
                  • their intent to re-enter the video distribution market in the next several years using fiber facilities. The number of subscribers receiving their video programming from a wireless (MMDS) operator remained steady over the past year at about 0.22 percent of MVPD subscribers, and MVPD subscribers served by private cable operators (PCOs) has declined slightly over the last year, from a 1.3 percent to 1.2 percent of all MVPD subscribers. Cable multiple system operators (MSOs) and other MVPDs continue to offer nonvideo advanced services. Some cable operators continue to offer access to the Internet through the subscriber's television and a specially designed set-top box, but the most popular way to access the Internet over cable is through the use of a cable
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-148A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-148A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-148A1.txt
                  • assets to its shareholders. As currently planned, the merged entity's executive headquarters would reside in Reston, Virginia, and its operational headquarters would be in Overland Park, Kansas. Sprint Nextel will be led by a board of directors drawn equally from the pre-merger boards of the two companies. The merger would be achieved through a stock-for-stock transaction with Nextel shareholders receiving 1.3 shares of Sprint common stock and $.50 in cash for each Nextel common share. The actual stock/cash allocation is subject to adjustment in order to facilitate the spin-off of Sprint's local telecommunications business on a tax-free basis, and will be determined at the time of the merger. The equity interests in Sprint and Nextel are being valued equally in the
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-154A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-154A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-154A1.txt
                  • U.S.-Philippines route from the International Settlements Policy (ISP) in accordance with the policies that we adopted in the 2004 ISP Reform Policy. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 5, 201, 214, and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 154(j), 155, 201-205, 214, 303(r), 309 and Sections 1.3 and 1.115 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.115, that the Petition for Reconsideration of the Commission's Order on Review and the International Bureau's March 10, 2003 Order filed by PLDT is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the ISP Reform First Report and Order and sections 0.51 and 0.261 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. ��
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-161A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-161A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-161A1.txt
                  • the Commission's numbering rules require certain types of carriers to offer local number portability (``LNP''). The Commission's number portability rules, however, do not extend to location or service portability. Due to the catastrophic damage to telecommunications systems caused by Hurricane Katrina in the Gulf Coast states, carriers may need to port numbers to destinations outside the affected rate centers. Section 1.3 of our rules authorizes the Commission to suspend, revoke, amend, or waive a Commission rule for good cause shown. We recognize that telecommunications service must be restored to the hurricane victims as quickly as possible and we find that waiver of the Commission's local number portability and number assignment rules is a reasonable and practical means for doing so. Accordingly,
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-163A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-163A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-163A1.txt
                  • a private entity for a fee'' - and we will be sure to investigate any allegations of abuse and to pursue appropriate enforcement action against any entity that may violate these rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i) and 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), and 251(e), and sections 1.3 and 52.111 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 52.111, that Database Service Management, Inc. (``DSMI''), reassign the toll-free number which spells 1-800-RED-CROSS (1-800-733-2767) to the national chapter of the American Red Cross for a period of one year as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 251(e) and 408 of the Communications Act
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-164A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-164A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-164A1.txt
                  • affected areas. We recognize that customers that have been displaced by the hurricane may desire to discontinue their service temporarily and to reinstate it at a later time. Due to the catastrophic nature of the damage to telecommunications systems, we expect that in many cases these customers may seek to reinstate their service after the 90-day period has lapsed. Section 1.3 of our rules authorizes the Commission to suspend, revoke, amend, or waive a Commission rule for good cause shown. Accordingly, we find that, in order to promote the maintenance and rebuilding of communities in hurricane ravaged areas and to facilitate continued access to telecommunications services for hurricane victims, it is in the public interest to waive section 52.15(f)(ii) of the
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-166A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-166A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-166A1.txt
                  • application to the instant case, and grant of the waiver would be in the public interest; or (ii) in view of the unique or unusual factual circumstances of the specific situation, application of the rule would be inequitable, unduly burdensome or contrary to the public interest, or the entity requesting the waiver has no reasonable alternative. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925. See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969), appeal after remand, 459 F.2d 1203 (D.C. Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972); see also Northeast Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (a waiver of the Commission's rules may be granted in instances where the particular facts make strict compliance
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-169A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-169A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-169A1.txt
                  • application to the instant case, and grant of the waiver would be in the public interest; or (ii) in view of the unique or unusual factual circumstances of the specific situation, application of the rule would be inequitable, unduly burdensome or contrary to the public interest, or the entity requesting the waiver has no reasonable alternative. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925. See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969), appeal after remand, 459 F.2d 1203 (D.C. Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972); see also Northeast Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (a waiver of the Commission's rules may be granted in instances where the particular facts make strict compliance
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-171A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-171A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-171A1.txt
                  • areas where it already has qualified for pricing flexibility for special access services by satisfying the applicable competitive triggers for its advanced services. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1, 2, 4(i), 4(j), and 201-205 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 152, 154(i), 154(j), 201-205, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, Verizon's petition for waiver of section 69.729 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 69.729, and paragraph 173 of the Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14310, paragraph 173, IS DENIED, as set forth herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1, 2, 4(i), 4(j), and
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-178A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-178A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-178A1.txt
                  • 254, 303(r), and 403 this Order IS ADOPTED, and the temporary rules SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE immediately upon release of this Order, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. �� 408, 553(d)(3), 47 U.S.C. �� 408, 553(d)(3). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to 4(i) and 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i) and 251(e), and sections 1.1 and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1 and 1.3, that our procedural rules relating to the universal service fund are waived to the extent herein described. Furthermore, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 251(b)(2),and 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 251(b)(2) and 251(e), and section 1.3 of the Commission's
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-181A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-181A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-181A1.txt
                  • II service. After ensuring that 100 percent of all new digital handsets activated are location-capable, licensees must achieve ninety-five percent penetration among their subscribers of location-capable handsets no later than December 31, 2005. Applicable Waiver Standards The Commission has recognized that smaller carriers may face extraordinary circumstances in meeting one or more of the deadlines for Phase II deployment. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules establishes that the Commission may grant relief from its rules for good cause shown. Further, pursuant to Section 1.925(b)(3), the Commission may grant a request for waiver if the underlying purpose of the rule(s) would not be served or would be frustrated by application to the instant case, and that grant would be in the public
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-182A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-182A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-182A1.txt
                  • the deadline for ensuring that 100 percent of all new digital handsets activated will be April 1, 2006. We reiterate that any party seeking a waiver from our E911 rules must demonstrate a clear path to full compliance. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the ENHANCE 911 Act, Pub. L. No. 108-494, 118 Stat. 3986 (2004), and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the foregoing Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Petition of Missouri RSA No. 7 Limited Partnership d/b/a Mid-Missouri Cellular for Waiver of Section 20.18(g)(1)(v) of the Commission's Rules IS GRANTED IN PART, to the extent described above, and subject to the conditions and reporting requirements
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-188A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-188A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-188A1.txt
                  • and impose conditions and reporting requirements to ensure that SouthernLINC achieves full compliance with the Commission's E911 requirements. We reiterate that any party seeking a waiver from our E911 rules must demonstrate a clear path to full compliance. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the ENHANCE 911 Act, Pub. L. No. 108-494, 118 Stat. 3986 (2004), and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the foregoing Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Request for Waiver by Southern Communications Services, Inc. d/b/a SouthernLINC Wireless IS GRANTED IN PART to the extent described above, and subject to the conditions and reporting requirements specified herein. The deadline for compliance with Section 20.18(g)(1)(v)
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-18A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-18A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-18A1.txt
                  • is the percentage change in the quantity demanded for a particular product will be following a one percent change in the price of that product. See Robert S. Pindyck & Daniel L. Rubenfeld, Microeconomics 29 (1992). See Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14267-69, paras. 84-86. See Pindyck & Rubenfeld at 32; see also DOJ Merger Guidelines �� 1.0, 1.3, 3 (the guidelines refer to these factors as supply substitution factors, i.e., possible production responses). Pricing Flexibility Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 14297-98, para. 144. Id. Supply responsiveness is typically measured using elasticity of supply, a concept parallel to that used for demand elasticity. See Pindyck & Rubenfeld at 32. Supply elasticity measures the percentage change in the quantity supplied
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-199A1.txt
                  • MINIMUM SIGNAL LEVEL AT TOV Chan 3 Chan 10 Chan 30 Planning factor values (dBm) -81.0 -81.0 -84.0 Median across all receivers (dBm) -82.2 -83.2 -83.9 Difference from OET-69 planning factors -1.2 -2.2 0.1 Deviations of receivers from median (dB) --Best performing receiver (dB) -2.5 -1.7 -1.4 --Worst performing receiver (dB) 12.5 4.3 2.5 --90th percentile receiver (dB) 5.1 3.1 1.3 Standard deviation (dB) 3.7 1.6 0.9 Total span from worst to best receiver (dB) 15.0 6.0 3.9 Table 1 Statistics of Minimum Signal Level at TOV The median minimum signal levels for the study sample were slightly better - by 1.2 dB and 2.2 dB, respectively - than the low-VHF and high-VHF planning factor value (-81.0 dBm) and closely matched
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-200A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-200A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-200A1.txt
                  • and impose conditions and reporting requirements to ensure that Cellcom achieves full compliance with the Commission's E911 requirements. We reiterate that any party seeking a waiver from our E911 rules must demonstrate a clear path to full compliance. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the ENHANCE 911 Act, Pub. L. No. 108-494, 118 Stat. 3986 (2004), and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the foregoing Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Request for Limited Waiver and Extension of the Commission's Phase II E911 Rules filed by Northeast Communications of Wisconsin, Inc. dba Cellcom IS GRANTED IN PART to the extent described above, and subject to the conditions and
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-200A1_Erratum.doc
                  • and impose conditions and reporting requirements to ensure that Cellcom achieves full compliance with the Commission's E911 requirements. We reiterate that any party seeking a waiver from our E911 rules must demonstrate a clear path to full compliance. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the ENHANCE 911 Act, Pub. L. No. 108-494, 118 Stat. 3986 (2004), and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the foregoing Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Request for Limited Waiver and Extension of the Commission's Phase II E911 Rules filed by Northeast Communications of Wisconsin, Inc. dba Cellcom IS GRANTED IN PART to the extent described above, and subject to the conditions and
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-201A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-201A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-201A1.txt
                  • conditions and reporting requirements to ensure that Golden State achieves full compliance with the Commission's E911 requirements. We reiterate that any party seeking a waiver from the Commission's E911 rules must demonstrate a clear path to full compliance. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the ENHANCE 911 Act, Pub. L. No. 108-494, 118 Stat. 3986 (2004), and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the foregoing Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Request for Limited Waiver and Extension of the Handset Penetration Deadline of the Commission's Phase II E911 Rules filed by California RSA No. 3 Limited Partnership d/b/a Golden State Cellular IS GRANTED IN PART to the extent
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-205A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-205A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-205A1.txt
                  • at 22659-70, App. C: Adjusted GAO Rate Data (showing rates in several urban areas near or exceeding the reasonable comparability benchmark of the nationwide average urban rate plus two standard deviations that the Qwest II court rejected); see also Industry Analysis and Technology Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Reference Book of Rates, Price Indices, and Household Expenditures for Telephone Service, Table 1.3 (May 2005) (showing urban areas with rates near or exceeding the 2005 nationwide urban rate benchmark of $34.21). Order on Remand, 18 FCC Rcd at 22659-70, App. C (showing rates in many rural areas below the nationwide average urban rate). For example, would a requirement that any universal service funds received by a carrier be displayed on an end user's
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-208A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-208A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-208A1.txt
                  • Order''); see also Applications for Consent to the Transfer of Control of Licenses and Section 214 Authorizations by Time Warner Inc. and America Online, Inc., Transferors, to AOL Time Warner Inc., Transferee, CS Docket No. 00-30, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 18 FCC Rcd. 16835, 16836 � 5 (2003). We note that we are not granting the waiver pursuant to section 1.3, as requested by petitioners, since Section 1.3 concerns waiver of our rules. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Rather, we are modifying the merger conditions pursuant to our authority under sections 303(r) (which authorizes the Commission ``as public convenience, interest or necessity requires ... [to] prescribe ... such restrictions and conditions, not inconsistent with law, as may be necessary to carry
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-20A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-20A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-20A1.txt
                  • resources in the North American Numbering Plan. IP-Enabled Services NPRM, 19 FCC Rcd at 4914. Id. See SBCIS Petition at 2. Comment Sought on SBC IP Communications, Inc. Petition for Limited Waiver of Section 52.15(g)(2)(i) of the Commission's Rules Regarding Access to Numbering Resources, Public Notice, CC Docket No. 99-200, 19 FCC Rcd 13158 (2004). See Appendix. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; see also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972) (WAIT Radio). Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (Northeast Cellular). WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1159; Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1157. Id. at 1159. The Commission emphasizes that it is
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-210A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-210A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-210A1.txt
                  • and impose conditions and reporting requirements to ensure that Leaco achieves full compliance with the Commission's E911 requirements. We reiterate that any party seeking a waiver from our E911 rules must demonstrate a clear path to full compliance. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the ENHANCE 911 Act, Pub. L. No. 108-494, 118 Stat. 3986 (2004), and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, that the foregoing Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that an extension of time IS GRANTED to Leaco to augment the record with respect to its request for further extensions of time to comply with the location-capable handset sale and activation requirements contained in Section 20.18(g)(1)(i)-(iv), as requested in the Leaco Rural Telephone
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-215A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-215A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-215A1.txt
                  • impose conditions and reporting requirements to ensure that Cellular South achieves full compliance with the Commission's E911 requirements. We reiterate that any party seeking a waiver from our E911 rules must demonstrate a clear path to full compliance. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the ENHANCE 911 Act, Pub. L. No. 108-494, 118 Stat. 3986 (2004), and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the foregoing Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Request for Limited Waiver and Extension of the Handset Penetration Deadline of the Commission's Phase II E911 Rules by Cellular South Licenses, Inc., IS GRANTED IN PART to the extent described above, and subject to the conditions
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-2A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-2A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-2A1.txt
                  • We find that the precedent cited by Valor does not provide a basis for granting Valor a waiver of section 54.305 of the Commission's rules three years after consummation of the transfer. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1-4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 U.S.C. � 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.305 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.305, filed by Valor Telecommunications of Texas, L.P., on April 30, 2003, IS DENIED IN PART and GRANTED IN PART to the extent provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Valor Telecommunications of Texas, L.P.,
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-30A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-30A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-30A1.txt
                  • and Inmarsat, we decided to conduct independent tests on Inmarsat METs. The International Bureau asked Inmarsat to supply METs and the special test equipment required to simulate the link from the METs through its satellites to its land earth stations. The Bureau asked MSV to supply the METs on which it had conducted receiver front-end 1 dB compression point measurements. 1.3. Inmarsat arranged to have its equipment manufacturers supply four METs for testing. One of these METs is an Inmarsat Fleet 77 marine terminal, one is designed for vehicular mounting and is based on a similar Inmarsat Fleet 55 marine terminal, and two are portable METs. These METs are all capable of receiving 64 kilobit per second (kbps) 16-state quadrature-amplitude modulation
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-32A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-32A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-32A1.txt
                  • Att. A at 2, Row 23 Column F and Row 36 Column F (filed Nov. 4, 2003) (BellSouth Transmittal No. 756) (showing total weighted costs of $2.45 for a manually processed PIC change and $0.48 for an electronically processed PIC change); AT&T Supplemental Comments at 6-7; Verizon Supplemental Comments at Att. B, Ex. Verizon East PIC Cost Workpapers 1.2 and 1.3 Row 38 (loaded manual PIC change cost is $6.25 and electronic is $2.06 for Verizon East), Ex. Verizon West PIC Cost Workpapers 1.2 and 1.3 Row 29 (loaded manual PIC change cost is $6.28 and electronic is $1.86 for Verizon West). ACUTA Supplemental Comments at 2; Cincinnati Bell Supplemental Comments at 3; Sprint Supplemental Comments at 3; Verizon Supplemental Comments
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-62A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-62A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-62A1.txt
                  • disclose proprietary data regarding their antenna installation practices. Discussion. We revise our rules to begin the Ku-band antenna gain pattern envelope at 1.5� off-axis, instead of the current 1.25�. Spacenet and SIA argue that VSAT licensees can generally achieve a pointing error of 0.4� and 0.5�, respectively. While this suggests starting the Ku-band antenna gain pattern envelope at 1.4� or 1.3� off-axis, other commenters support starting the Ku-band antenna gain pattern envelope at 1.5� off-axis. We adopt the 1.5� proposal. We base this decision in part on Spacenet's observation that the Commission has licensed a number of sub-meter earth station antennas in the past, and that those antennas intersect the antenna gain pattern envelope at 1.5� off-axis or less. In addition,
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-62A1_Erratum.doc
                  • disclose proprietary data regarding their antenna installation practices. Discussion. We revise our rules to begin the Ku-band antenna gain pattern envelope at 1.5� off-axis, instead of the current 1.25�. Spacenet and SIA argue that VSAT licensees can generally achieve a pointing error of 0.4� and 0.5�, respectively. While this suggests starting the Ku-band antenna gain pattern envelope at 1.4� or 1.3� off-axis, other commenters support starting the Ku-band antenna gain pattern envelope at 1.5� off-axis. We adopt the 1.5� proposal. We base this decision in part on Spacenet's observation that the Commission has licensed a number of sub-meter earth station antennas in the past, and that those antennas intersect the antenna gain pattern envelope at 1.5� off-axis or less. In addition,
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-63A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-63A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-63A1.txt
                  • noise plus interference (C/N+I) ratio of about 0.7 dB, assuming a 6.1-meter hub earth station antenna, 1.2-meter remote earth station antennas, and two-degree orbital spacing between co-coverage satellite networks. PanAmSat asserts further that an increase in downlink EIRP spectral density of 6 dB, i.e., to 12 dBW/4 kHz, would result in a degradation of the composite C/N+I ratio of about 1.3 dB under the same assumptions. PanAmSat maintains that most link budgets have a 1 dB margin, and so a higher EIRP downlink density can be tolerated. In other words, PanAmSat asserts that all earth stations currently in operation could increase their power to 10 dBW/4 kHz without causing harmful interference into each others' systems. Hughes responds that increasing the power
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-63A1_Erratum.doc
                  • noise plus interference (C/N+I) ratio of about 0.7 dB, assuming a 6.1-meter hub earth station antenna, 1.2-meter remote earth station antennas, and two-degree orbital spacing between co-coverage satellite networks. PanAmSat asserts further that an increase in downlink EIRP spectral density of 6 dB, i.e., to 12 dBW/4 kHz, would result in a degradation of the composite C/N+I ratio of about 1.3 dB under the same assumptions. PanAmSat maintains that most link budgets have a 1 dB margin, and so a higher EIRP downlink density can be tolerated. In other words, PanAmSat asserts that all earth stations currently in operation could increase their power to 10 dBW/4 kHz without causing harmful interference into each others' systems. Hughes responds that increasing the power
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-74A1.txt
                  • are inconsistent with sections 65.600(d)(2) and 61.45(d). We find it to be in the public interest to grant waivers of these rules to the extent necessary to permit the LECs to restore for the years 1992 through 1995 the accrued OPEB liabilities that the LECs deducted from their rate bases in compliance with the now vacated RAO Letter 20. Section 1.3 gives the Commission plenary authority to waive ``at any time'' any rule provision on its own motion or at the request of a petitioning party ``for good cause.'' Good cause exists ``if particular facts would make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest.'' We conclude that, in the specific circumstances of this case, it would be inequitable to enforce the
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-77A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-77A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-77A1.txt
                  • of enhancing telecommunications access among consumers on Tribal lands and its responsibility to ensure a standard of livability for members of Indian tribes. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1, 4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 254, and the authority under sections 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the Waiver Petition filed by Smith Bagley, Inc., on November 15, 2004, IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary The Lifeline and Link-Up program is a universal service support mechanism designed to ensure that quality telecommunications services are available to low-income consumers at just, reasonable, and affordable rates. See 47
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-79A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-79A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-79A1.txt
                  • ruling on their waiver petitions. The stay permitted additional time for the Tier III carriers to supplement the record and for the Commission to address the issues presented in the requests for relief. APPLICABLE WAIVER STANDARDS The Commission has recognized that smaller carriers may face extraordinary circumstances in meeting one or more of the deadlines for Phase II deployment. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules establishes that the Commission may grant relief from its rules for good cause shown. The Commission generally finds good cause to grant a waiver of its rules where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest if applied to the petitioner and when the relief requested would not undermine the policy objective of
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-87A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-87A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-87A1.txt
                  • local number portability at this time are likely to be better addressed in the context of Section 208 formal compliant proceedings or related mediations as opposed to FCC-initiated forfeiture proceedings. In this connection, we note that a violation of our number portability rules would constitute an unjust and unreasonable practice under section 201(b) of the Act. . 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, 52.25(e). See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1158 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972). See e.g., Franklin Telephone Company, Inc. Petition for Waiver, CC Docket Nos. 95-116 (filed Sept. 24, 2003); Intercommunity Telephone Company, LLC Petition for Waiver, CC Docket No. 95-116 (filed Sept. 24, 2003); and North Central Telephone Cooperative, Inc. Petition for
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-91A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-91A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-91A1.txt
                  • will return them to the applicant without processing. Notwithstanding these transition periods, there may be limited instances where electronic filing may be unduly burdensome or create a hardship for some potential applicants. For such cases, we will permit applicants to file a request for waiver of our electronic filing requirements under limited circumstances for good cause shown, pursuant to section 1.3 of our rules. In order to qualify for a waiver, applicants must show, at a minimum, that filing electronically would cause a hardship, and they must plead with particularity the facts and circumstances warranting relief. For example, the applicant must set forth the specific reasons why electronic filing would constitute an unreasonable burden or expense. This approach is consistent with
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-91A1_Erratum.doc
                  • will return them to the applicant without processing. Notwithstanding these transition periods, there may be limited instances where electronic filing may be unduly burdensome or create a hardship for some potential applicants. For such cases, we will permit applicants to file a request for waiver of our electronic filing requirements under limited circumstances for good cause shown, pursuant to section 1.3 of our rules. In order to qualify for a waiver, applicants must show, at a minimum, that filing electronically would cause a hardship, and they must plead with particularity the facts and circumstances warranting relief. For example, the applicant must set forth the specific reasons why electronic filing would constitute an unreasonable burden or expense. This approach is consistent with
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-105A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-105A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-105A1.txt
                  • We believe all parties will benefit, especially the American consumer. For similar reasons, I also wholeheartedly support binding arbitration of the dispute between the Mid-Atlantic Sports Network and Comcast over carriage of the Washington Nationals games. Protracted negotiations and legal wrangling between the parties somehow have failed to produce televised coverage of 75 percent of this season's games for the 1.3 million Comcast subscribers in the Washington D.C. market. And, apparently, the MASN complaint has been left to rot in some lost crypt inside this building. Accordingly, the narrow arbitration remedy in the Order creates a private-sector solution to the dispute. This remedy also does not dictate a particular outcome, nor does it create a new legal standard for reviewing program
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-105A6.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-105A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-105A6.txt
                  • We believe all parties will benefit, especially the American consumer. For similar reasons, I also wholeheartedly support binding arbitration of the dispute between the Mid-Atlantic Sports Network and Comcast over carriage of the Washington Nationals games. Protracted negotiations and legal wrangling between the parties somehow have failed to produce televised coverage of 75 percent of this season's games for the 1.3 million Comcast subscribers in the Washington D.C. market. And, apparently, the MASN complaint has been left to rot in some lost crypt inside this building. Accordingly, the narrow arbitration remedy in the Order creates a private-sector solution to the dispute. This remedy also does not dictate a particular outcome, nor does it create a new legal standard for reviewing program
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-123A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-123A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-123A1.txt
                  • PDI in meeting the March 1, 2007 effective date when all new TV receivers must comply with the DTV tuner requirement. In view of these circumstances, and pursuant to PDI's request that the Commission provide for a waiver of the rules in such cases, we find that a limited waiver of the DTV tuner requirement under the provisions of Section 1.3 is warranted to allow PDI additional time to bring the existing models of its viewing units into compliance. In this limited case of receivers used as part of a system intended for use in health care facilities, we find that providing an additional year for PDI Communications to bring its existing video system viewing unit models into compliance would serve
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-126A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-126A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-126A1.txt
                  • period of time is necessary to protect the integrity of the program, and to guard against the possibility of additional waste, fraud, and abuse. Accordingly, we debar NextiraOne. We also deny NextiraOne's request to waive the debarment rule in this case. Those who seek to avoid debarment by requesting waiver of the rule must meet a similarly high burden. Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules governs petitions for waiver generally, and provides that a waiver may be granted upon ``good cause shown.'' Because Commission rules are presumed valid, the petitioner bears a heavy burden. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule ``only if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule and such a deviation will serve
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-144A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-144A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-144A1.txt
                  • For a list of members, see http://www.internet2.edu/membership/. May 8th Universal Service Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 9109, � 634. We note that whether the Commission's existing RHC rules should be modified to permit funding of such facilities is under consideration in an open proceeding. 2004 Rural Health Care FNPRM, 19 FCC Rcd 24613, at 24636-37, �� 51-53. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that ``[a]ny provision of the rules may be waived by the Commission on its own motion or on petition if good cause therefore is shown.'' Waiver of the Commission's rules is therefore appropriate only if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, and such deviation will serve the public interest. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-145A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-145A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-145A1.txt
                  • 160, and section 1.103(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.103(a), that the Commission's forbearance decision SHALL BE EFFECTIVE on September 28, 2006. Pursuant to sections 1.4 and 1.13 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.4 and 1.13, the time for appeal shall run from the release date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that the emergency petition for interim waiver of Fones4All IS DISMISSED AS MOOT as set forth herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 5(c)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 155(c)(5), and section 1.115(g) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.115(g), that the application for
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-150A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-150A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-150A1.txt
                  • licensees in the Bay Area, but elected channel *6 in response to the conflict letter it received. As a licensee with a low-VHF TCD, KVIE was permitted to seek an alternative TCD in the third round, and did so by again electing (via FCC Form 386) channel *9. In its application, KVIE acknowledges that its proposal is predicted to cause 1.3 percent new interference to the TCD of DTV channel *9 for NCE station KIXE-TV, Redding, California. KVIE argues, however, that use of channel 6 would provide inferior service to its viewers, and that the public interest would be better served by Commission approval of KVIE's third round channel selection. The Northern California Educational Television Association filed comments opposing KVIE's request,
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-150A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-150A2.txt
                  • 21 20 500 436 42051 303518 873316 27240 1215 0 83740ALMOBILE 23 337 574 75124 303645 873843 38025 1283 0 73187ALMOBILE 5 271000 581 74800 304120 874949 45411 1406 0.3 721ALMOBILE 42 41 199 185 303933 875333 16297 912 0.1 13993ALMONTGOMERY 12 12 24.9 507 74369 315828 860944 31615 788 0.5 73642ALMONTGOMERY 20 161000 518 29552 315828 860944 37695 829 1.3 706ALMONTGOMERY 26 27 568 176 322255 861733 18017 549 3.7 72307ALMONTGOMERY 32 32 199 545 75049 320830 864443 28414 579 0.6 60829ALMONTGOMERY 45 46 500 308 28430 322413 861147 21909 641 0.3 711ALMOUNT CHEAHA 7 7 19 610 74635 332907 854833 40921 2236 2.9 11113ALOPELIKA 66 47 136 539 74487 321916 844728 24321 662 1.3 32851ALOZARK 34 33 15 151
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-158A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-158A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-158A1.txt
                  • and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 26912, 26929, para. 40 (2003). 47 C.F.R. � 54.522. See Pleading Cycle Established for Eligible Services List for Universal Service Mechanism for Schools and Libraries, CC Docket No. 96-45, FCC 06-109, Public Notice (rel. Jul. 21, 2006) (July 21st Public Notice). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.522. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (providing that the Commission's rules may be waived for good cause). See Comments of Nsight 1-2; On-Tech Consulting, Inc. 4. See, e.g., Comments of IBM Global Services 2, On-Tech Consulting, Inc. 2; E-Rate Service Provider Forum 4. See Comments and Reply Comments of State E-rate Coordinators Alliance 4; E-Rate Service Provider Forum 3; Tropos Networks 1-6; Sprint Nextel Corporation 2-3;
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-15A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-15A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-15A1.txt
                  • location-capable handsets. Specifically, we extend the date that Thumb must achieve 95% penetration until July 31, 2006. We further impose the conditions and reporting requirements described above to ensure that Thumb achieves full compliance with the Commission's E911 requirements. ordering clauses IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the ENHANCE 911 Act, Pub. L. No. 108-494, 118 Stat. 3986 (2004), and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the foregoing Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Request for Waiver of the December 31, 2005 95% GPS Subscriber Penetration Requirement filed by Thumb Cellular LLC IS GRANTED, subject to the conditions and reporting requirements specified herein. The deadline for compliance with Section 20.18(g)(1)(v) will
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-162A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-162A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-162A1.txt
                  • handsets. Specifically, we extend the date by which Appalachian must achieve 95% penetration to December 31, 2006. We further impose the conditions and reporting requirements described above to ensure that Appalachian achieves full compliance with the Commission's E911 requirements. ordering clauses IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the ENHANCE 911 Act, Pub. L. No. 108-494, 118 Stat. 3986 (2004), and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the foregoing Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Request for Additional Limited Waiver and Extension of the Handset Penetration Deadline of the Commission's Phase II E911 Rules by East Kentucky Network, LLC d/b/a Appalachian Wireless IS GRANTED, subject to the conditions and reporting requirements specified
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-166A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-166A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-166A1.txt
                  • this vein, we note that so-called ``live'' programming is not literally live - viewers at home do not see an event at the very time that it is actually occurring. Rather, there is a natural delay caused by the time that it takes a signal to reach viewers. The record shows that digital signals, for example, may take up to 1.3 to 3.3 seconds to reach viewers over-the-air. And, if viewers are receiving such signals through a cable operator or satellite provider, there may be an additional delay of up to 3 seconds. Finally, if a viewer has a digital video recorder, there is another additional delay of approximately another half-second. Thus, using a conservative estimate, a viewer may be watching
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-167A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-167A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-167A1.txt
                  • maintained by a Domestic Communications Company in the normal course of business, includes without limitation subscriber identification, called party number, calling party number, start time, end time, call duration, feature invocation and deactivation, feature interaction, registration information, user location, diverted to number, conference party numbers, post cut-through dial digit extraction, in-band and out-of-band signaling, and party add, drop and hold. 1.3. ``Classified Information'' means any information that has been determined pursuant to Executive Order 12958, or any predecessor or successor order, or the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, or any statute that succeeds or amends the Atomic Energy Act, to require protection against unauthorized disclosure. 1.4. ``Control'' and ``Controls'' means the power, direct or indirect, whether or not exercised, and whether
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-16A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-16A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-16A1.txt
                  • and impose conditions and reporting requirements to ensure that Farmers achieves full compliance with the Commission's E911 requirements. We reiterate that any party seeking a waiver from our E911 rules must demonstrate a clear path to full compliance. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the ENHANCE 911 Act, Pub. L. No. 108-494, 118 Stat. 3986 (2004), and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the foregoing Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Farmers Mutual Telephone Company Petition for Temporary and Limited Waiver of Section 21.18(g)(1)(v) of the Commission's Rules filed November 14, 2005 IS GRANTED IN PART to the extent described above, and subject to the conditions and reporting
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-170A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-170A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-170A1.txt
                  • of the program and will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under our own procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 54.722(a), that Kan-ed, Kansas Board of Regents' Request for Waiver IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-171A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-171A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-171A1.txt
                  • find that Dobson has failed to satisfy the Commission's waiver standards. For these reasons, we deny Dobson's request to waive the handset penetration deadline. In light of the particular circumstances faced by Dobson, however, we will not pursue enforcement action with respect to Dobson's failure to timely comply with Section 20.18(g)(1)(v). ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED pursuant to Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the foregoing Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Dobson Cellular Systems, Inc. Request for Limited Waiver of December 31, 2005 E911 Deadline IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary See Dobson Cellular Systems, Inc. Request for Limited Waiver of December 31, 2005 E911
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-172A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-172A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-172A1.txt
                  • about Superior's business (including direct contact information), how a Superior livestock auction works (including definitions of commonly-used terms), and how to participate in a Superior livestock auction. Indeed, RFD-TV's web site acknowledges that it maintains a special relationship with Superior, noting that the commercial enterprise ``teamed up with RFD-TV'' and touting that, through programming distributed by RFD-TV, Superior ``sells over 1.3 million head of cattle a year over the television.'' Likewise, the record and publicly-available information also indicate that Superior informs the viewing public of its special relationship with RFD-TV. For example, Superior describes itself in an agricultural publication as engaged in ``[c]ommercial cattle marketing through the use of bi-weekly satellite video auctions broadcast on RFD-TV, daily Internet auctions, private treaty
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-175A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-175A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-175A1.txt
                  • Petitioners argue that they should be allowed to treat these settlement costs as exogenous. DISCUSSION We find that Petitioners have made a showing sufficient to warrant waiver of section 61.45(d) to permit them to treat as exogenous those settlement costs that relate to refunds of EUCL charges improperly assessed on IPSPs from October 15, 1993, to April 15, 1997. Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules provides the Commission with the authority to grant waivers "if good cause therefore is shown." Courts have interpreted this rule as requiring Petitioners to demonstrate that special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule and that such a deviation will serve the public interest. As discussed below, we find that Petitioners have demonstrated that a
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-179A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-179A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-179A1.txt
                  • of Channels Cable Service Sample Groups Overall Non-Comp. Sample Communities With a Finding of Effective Competition by Primary Basis for Finding Sample Group Overall Communities with a Second Cable Operator DBS Wire-less LP Test Sub-group Overall First Cable System Rival Cable System January 1, 2005 Basic tier 24.9 24.9 24.5 23.8 21.2 30.9 26.0 23.3 24.6 Standard error 0.7 0.7 1.3 1.5 0.9 3.0 1.2 1.0 2.6 Expanded basic tier 45.6 45.4 47.5 50.1 52.0 45.0 44.5 48.0 44.1 Standard error 0.8 0.8 1.5 1.6 1.0 3.1 1.5 1.3 3.4 Basic + expanded 70.5 70.3 72.0 73.9 73.2 75.9 70.5 71.3 68.7 Standard error 0.6 0.5 0.9 0.9 0.7 1.5 0.9 0.9 2.1 Digital tier 33.7 33.6 34.2 35.8 35.1 37.8
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-182A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-182A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-182A1.txt
                  • find that such action will not affect businesses with fewer than 25 employees. Materials in Accessible Formats . ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 2, 4(i), 4(j), 218 and 225 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 152, 154(i), 154(j), 218 and 225, and sections 1.2, 1.3, 64.604 and 64.605 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.2, 1.3, 64.604 and 64.605, this Declaratory Ruling hereby IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition to Amend filed by Petitioners IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Ultratec Petition to Clarify IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-183A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-183A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-183A1.txt
                  • contained in this proceeding. In addition, we note that pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4), we previously sought specific comment on how the Commission might ``further reduce the information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees.'' ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 1.925, that the foregoing Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Request for Limited Waiver by Sprint Nextel Corporation, filed Sept. 29, 2005, IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Sprint Nextel is subject to the reporting requirements specified herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the matter
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-184A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-184A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-184A1.txt
                  • contained in this proceeding. In addition, we note that pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4), we previously sought specific comment on how the Commission might ``further reduce the information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees.'' ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, that the foregoing Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Limited Waiver by Nextel Partners, Inc., filed Oct. 21, 2005, IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Nextel Partners is subject to the reporting requirements specified herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the matter of the non-compliance of Nextel Partners
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-20A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-20A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-20A1.txt
                  • conditions and reporting requirements to ensure that VA Cellular achieves full compliance with the Commission's E911 requirements. We reiterate that any party seeking a waiver from the Commission's E911 rules must demonstrate a clear path to full compliance. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the ENHANCE 911 Act, Pub. L. No. 108-494, 118 Stat. 3986 (2004), and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the foregoing Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Request for a Limited Waiver and Extension of the Commission's Phase II E911 Rules filed by Virginia Cellular LLC, Inc. d/b/a Cellular One IS GRANTED IN PART to the extent described above, and subject to the conditions
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-23A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-23A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-23A1.txt
                  • advantage of the relief provided herein and ETCs that provide this federal Lifeline Katrina relief are required to comply with the additional certification and program requirements set forth in the Hurricane Katrina Order. ORdering ClauseS Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to 4(i) and 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i) and 251(e), and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that the Petition filed by the states of Louisiana and Mississippi filed on November 28, 2005 IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to 4(i) and 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i) and 251(e), and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3,
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-25A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-25A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-25A1.txt
                  • (3) we extend the date that South Canaan must achieve 95% penetration until December 31, 2006. We further impose the conditions and reporting requirements described above to ensure that all Petitioners achieve full compliance with the Commission's E911 requirements. ordering clauses IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the ENHANCE 911 Act, Pub. L. No. 108-494, 118 Stat. 3986 (2004), and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the foregoing Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Request for Waiver of GPS Handset Penetration Rule by Badlands Cellular of North Dakota Limited Partnership IS GRANTED, subject to the conditions and reporting requirements specified herein. The deadline for compliance with Section 20.18(g)(1)(v) will be June
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-26A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-26A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-26A1.txt
                  • after which we expect Chinook to have transitioned its subscribers to a network-based E911 Phase II solution. We further impose the conditions and reporting requirements described above to ensure that Chinook achieves full compliance with the Commission's E911 requirements. ordering clauses IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the ENHANCE 911 Act, Pub. L. No. 108-494, 118 Stat. 3986 (2004), and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the foregoing Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Request For a Limited Waiver and Extension of the Commission's Phase II E911 Rules by MTPCS, LLC dba Chinook Wireless IS GRANTED, subject to the conditions and reporting requirements specified herein. Section 20.18(g)(1)(v) is waived until September
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-29A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-29A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-29A1.txt
                  • separations factors. Accordingly, Heart of Iowa is required to recalculate its jurisdictional separations factors pursuant to the Separations Freeze Order and the Commission's rules. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that the petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze as codified in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Heart of Iowa Communications Cooperative and Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc. on November 26, 2003, IS CONDITIONALLY GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i),
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-2A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-2A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-2A1.txt
                  • we extend the date that Appalachian must achieve 95% penetration until June 30, 2006. We further impose the conditions and reporting requirements described above to ensure that Carolina West and Appalachian achieve full compliance with the Commission's E911 requirements. ordering clauses IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the ENHANCE 911 Act, Pub. L. No. 108-494, 118 Stat. 3986 (2004), and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the foregoing Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Request for Limited Waiver and Extension of the Handset Penetration Deadline of the Commission's Phase II E911 Rules by North Carolina RSA 3 Cellular Telephone Company d/b/a Carolina West Wireless IS GRANTED, subject to the conditions and
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-32A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-32A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-32A1.txt
                  • location-capable handsets. Specifically, we extend the date that Petitioners must achieve 95% penetration until one year following release of this Order, and impose conditions and reporting requirements to ensure that they achieve full compliance with the Commission's E911 requirements. ordering clauses IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the ENHANCE 911 Act, Pub. L. No. 108-494, 118 Stat. 3986 (2004), and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that this Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Request for Waiver of the December 31, 2005 95% GPS Subscriber Penetration Requirement by CTC Telecom, Inc. IS GRANTED IN PART to the extent described above, and subject to the conditions and reporting requirements specified herein. The deadline
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-36A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-36A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-36A1.txt
                  • we extend the date that South Central must achieve 95% penetration until one year following release of this Order. We further impose conditions and reporting requirements to ensure that Petitioners achieve full compliance with the Commission's E911 requirements. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the ENHANCE 911 Act, Pub. L. No. 108-494, 118 Stat. 3986 (2004), and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the foregoing Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Petition for Temporary Waiver or Temporary Stay by North Dakota Network Company IS GRANTED( subject to the conditions and reporting requirements specified herein. The deadline for compliance with Section 20.18(g)(1)(v) will be September 30( 2006. IT IS
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-39A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-39A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-39A1.txt
                  • and impose conditions and reporting requirements to ensure that C&CC achieves full compliance with the Commission's E911 requirements. We reiterate that any party seeking a waiver from our E911 rules must demonstrate a clear path to full compliance. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the ENHANCE 911 Act, Pub. L. No. 108-494, 118 Stat. 3986 (2004), and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the foregoing Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Petition for Waiver of Section 20.18(g)(1)(v) filed by Cable & Communications Corporation, IS GRANTED IN PART to the extent described above, and subject to the conditions and reporting requirements specified herein. The deadline for compliance with Section
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-40A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-40A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-40A1.txt
                  • and impose conditions and reporting requirements to ensure that Pacifica achieves full compliance with the Commission's E911 requirements. We reiterate that any party seeking a waiver from our E911 rules must demonstrate a clear path to full compliance. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the ENHANCE 911 Act, Pub. L. No. 108-494, 118 Stat. 3986 (2004), and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the foregoing Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the GTE Pacifica, Inc. d/b/a Verizon Pacifica Request for Waiver filed December 19, 2005 IS GRANTED to the extent described above, and subject to the conditions and reporting requirements specified herein. The deadline for compliance with Section 20.18(g)(1)(v)
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-41A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-41A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-41A1.txt
                  • and impose conditions and reporting requirements to ensure that CVW achieves full compliance with the Commission's E911 requirements. We reiterate that any party seeking a waiver from our E911 rules must demonstrate a clear path to full compliance. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the ENHANCE 911 Act, Pub. L. No. 108-494, 118 Stat. 3986 (2004), and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the foregoing Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Copper Valley Wireless, Inc. Petition for Waiver or Temporary Stay filed December 20, 2005 IS GRANTED IN PART to the extent described above, and subject to the conditions and reporting requirements specified herein. The deadline for compliance
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-47A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-47A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-47A2.txt
                  • R 55 0 R]/Type/Pages/Parent 87 0 R>> endobj 90 0 obj<> endobj 91 0 obj<>stream xmlns:pdf='http://ns.adobe.com/pdf/1.3/' pdf:Producer='Acrobat Distiller 6.0 (Windows)'> Procedures Att.A.Proposed.Final.041106.xlsrknowles endstream endobj 92 0 obj<> endobj xref 0 93 0000000000 65535 f 0000007401 00000 n 0000007528 00000 n 0000007662 00000 n 0000010585 00000 n 0000010712
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-54A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-54A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-54A1.txt
                  • of the program and will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under our own procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review and Requests for Waiver of 47 C.F.R. �� 54.507(c) and 54.504(b) filed by the petitioners as listed in Appendices A-C ARE GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934,
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-55A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-55A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-55A1.txt
                  • that, after USAC completes its application review procedures for the appeals identified in this Order, it may conclude that funding is not warranted and deny the request. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 54.722(a), this Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any and all pending appeals before this Commission identified in the Appendix of this Order ARE REMANDED to the Administrator for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-59A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-59A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-59A1.txt
                  • for addressing individual requests for waiver. Instead, the Commission will continue to apply its well-established waiver criteria, and the standard enunciated under the ENHANCE 911 Act, on a case-by-case basis, in evaluating requests for waiver of the December 31, 2005 handset penetration requirement contained in Section 20.18(g)(1)(v) of the Commission's Rules. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the foregoing Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Joint Petition for Suspension or Waiver of the Location-Capable Handset Penetration Deadline filed by CTIA - The Wireless Association and the Rural Cellular Association IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary APPENDIX Comments ACS Wireless,
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-60A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-60A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-60A1.txt
                  • contained in this proceeding. In addition, we note that pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4), we previously sought specific comment on how the Commission might ``further reduce the information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees.'' ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the foregoing Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Request for Limited Waiver by Verizon IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that Verizon is subject to the reporting requirements specified herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary See Request for Limited Waiver by Verizon Wireless,
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-61A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-61A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-61A1.txt
                  • contained in this proceeding. In addition, we note that pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4), we previously sought specific comment on how the Commission might ``further reduce the information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees.'' ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED pursuant to Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the foregoing Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Petition for Limited Waiver and Brief Extension of Leap Wireless International, Inc. IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that Leap is subject to the reporting requirements specified herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Qwest Wireless, LLC
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-64A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-64A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-64A1.txt
                  • contained in this proceeding. In addition, we note that pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4), we previously sought specific comment on how the Commission might ``further reduce the information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees.'' ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED pursuant to Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the foregoing Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Alltel Corporation Petition for Limited Waiver IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that Alltel is subject to the reporting requirements specified herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the matter of Alltel's non-compliance with Section 20.18(g)(1)(v) SHALL BE
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-65A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-65A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-65A1.txt
                  • contained in this proceeding. In addition, we note that pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4), we previously sought specific comment on how the Commission might ``further reduce the information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees.'' ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED pursuant to Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the foregoing Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Request of Centennial Communications Corp. for Limited Waiver/Extension of Location-Capable Handset Penetration Deadline IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Centennial is subject to the reporting requirements specified herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Request
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-66A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-66A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-66A1.txt
                  • contained in this proceeding. In addition, we note that pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4), we previously sought specific comment on how the Commission might ``further reduce the information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees.'' ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED pursuant to Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the foregoing Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Request for a Limited Waiver of United States Cellular Corporation IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that USCC is subject to the reporting requirements specified herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the matter of USCC's non-compliance with
                • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-70A1.txt
                  • 0 R]/P 522 0 R/S/Sect>> endobj 522 0 obj<> endobj 523 0 obj<> endobj 524 0 obj<>stream xmlns:pdf='http://ns.adobe.com/pdf/1.3/'> endstream endobj 525 0 obj<
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-7A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-7A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-7A1.txt
                    • its subscribers, of location-capable handsets. Specifically, we extend the date that NTELOS must achieve 95% penetration until November 1, 2006, and impose conditions and reporting requirements to ensure that NTELOS achieves full compliance with the Commission's E911 requirements. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the ENHANCE 911 Act, Pub. L. No. 108-494, 118 Stat. 3986 (2004), and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the foregoing Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that The NTELOS Companies Petition for Limited Waiver filed October 21, 2005 IS GRANTED IN PART to the extent described above, and subject to the conditions and reporting requirements specified herein. The deadline for compliance with Section 20.18(g)(1)(v) will
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-86A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-86A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-86A1.txt
                    • for intertoll TWX circuits. The special circuit equipment cost assigned to telegraph grade and other private line services is directly assigned to the appropriate operations. * * * * * 4. Section 36.142 is revised by amending paragraph (a) as follows: Section 36.142 Categories and apportionment procedures. (a) Other Information Origination/Termination Equipment-Category 1. This category includes . . . subcategory 1.3 Exchange Line C&WF. If amounts of coinless pay telephone equipment are substantial, the cost of such equipment should be separately identified and allocated on the basis of relative toll minutes-of-use for interxchange carriers and minutes-of-use for exchange carriers. * * * * * 5. Section 36.152 is revised by amending paragraph (a) as follows: Section 36.152 Categories of Cable and
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-91A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-91A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-91A1.txt
                    • concluded that the person has committed some form of fraud related to the E-Rate program. The Second Report and Order offers only one example of such ``extraordinary circumstances'' -- reversal of the conviction or judgment upon which the debarment was based. Those who seek to avoid debarment by requesting waiver of the rule must meet a similarly high burden. Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules governs petitions for waiver generally, and provides that a waiver may be granted upon ``good cause shown.'' Because Commission rules are presumed valid, the petitioner bears a heavy burden. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule ``only if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule and such a deviation will serve
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-97A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-97A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-97A1.txt
                    • the carrier's control that have not been recovered elsewhere. Section 61.45(d) provides that exogenous costs ``shall be limited to those cost changes that the Commission shall permit or require by rule, rule waiver, or declaratory ruling.'' AT&T seeks a waiver of this rule because LNP costs are not listed in the rules as costs to be accorded exogenous treatment. Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules provides the Commission with the authority to grant waivers "if good cause therefore is shown." Courts have interpreted this rule as requiring petitioners to demonstrate that special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule and that such a deviation will serve the public interest. As discussed below, we find that the petitioner has demonstrated special
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-9A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-9A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-9A1.txt
                    • 2006, and we extend the date that Midwest must achieve 95% penetration until June 30, 2006. We further impose the conditions and reporting requirements described above to ensure that the Petitioners achieve full compliance with the Commission's E911 requirements. ordering clauses IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the ENHANCE 911 Act, Pub. L. No. 108-494, 118 Stat. 3986 (2004), and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the foregoing Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Petition for Temporary and Limited Waiver of Section 20.18(g)(1)(v) of the Commission's Rules by LL License Holdings, Inc. IS GRANTED, subject to the conditions and reporting requirements specified herein. The deadline for compliance with Section 20.18(g)(1)(v) will
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-107A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-107A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-107A1.txt
                    • service in the affected areas and shelters around the country. See Written Statement of Kevin J. Martin, Chairman, Federal Communications Commission at Hearing on Public Safety Communications from 9/11 to Katrina: Critical Public Policy Lessons, Before the Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Internet, Committee on Energy and Commerce, U.S. House of Representatives (September 29, 2005). See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.915(b), 1.925, 1.931(b)(5). See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. � 90.407 (providing a self-actuating mechanism whereby private land mobile and public safety licensees may utilize their radio stations for emergency communications in a manner other than that specified in the station authorization or in the rules and regulations governing the operation of such stations, during a period of emergency in which the
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-10A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-10A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-10A1.txt
                    • consistent with the waiver standards set out in Section 1.925 of the Commission's rules, and the Commission's E911 Phase II waiver standards, including a demonstration of a clear path to full compliance. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 405 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i) and 405, and Sections 1.3, 1.106, and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.106, and 1.925, that the foregoing Order on Reconsideration IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Joint Petition for Reconsideration filed by the Commnet Carriers IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary See Revision of the Commission's Rules to Ensure Compatibility with Enhanced 911 Emergency Calling
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-11A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-11A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-11A1.txt
                    • is scarce by excluding or delaying others from establishing satellite systems. 7. Rainbow seeks a waiver of the Commission's bond requirements in order to obtain consent to withdraw and unconditionally release the performance bonds it submitted to the Commission in obtaining the five Ka-band fixed-satellite service licenses at issue here. We are authorized to grant such a waiver under Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules if the petitioner demonstrates good cause for such action. Good cause, in turn, may be found and a waiver granted ``where particular facts would make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest.'' To make this public interest determination, the waiver cannot undermine the purposes of the rule, and there must be a stronger public interest benefit
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-11A1_Erratum.doc
                    • is scarce by excluding or delaying others from establishing satellite systems. 7. Rainbow seeks a waiver of the Commission's bond requirements in order to obtain consent to withdraw and unconditionally release the performance bonds it submitted to the Commission in obtaining the five Ka-band fixed-satellite service licenses at issue here. We are authorized to grant such a waiver under Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules if the petitioner demonstrates good cause for such action. Good cause, in turn, may be found and a waiver granted ``where particular facts would make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest.'' To make this public interest determination, the waiver cannot undermine the purposes of the rule, and there must be a stronger public interest benefit
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-127A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-127A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-127A1.txt
                    • The Bureau denied Comcast's request for waiver of the ban on integrated set-top boxes, finding that the boxes for which Comcast sought waiver (the ``Subject Boxes'') are not eligible for relief under (1) Section 629(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''); (2) the waiver policy established by the Commission for low-cost, limited-capability devices; and/or (3) Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's rules. As set forth below, we deny Comcast's Application for Review and affirm the Bureau's Order. BACKGROUND Congress directed the Commission to adopt regulations to assure the commercial availability of navigation devices more than ten years ago as part of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. The Commission implemented this directive in 1998 through the adoption
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-127A3.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-127A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-127A3.txt
                    • applicants sought and were granted relief for exactly the same boxes covered by the Comcast request. The basis for granting the waivers had nothing to do with the boxes - in each instance, the Bureau found the two-way functionality of these boxes to be too advanced to qualify as limited-capability devices. Instead, the Bureau orders used generic regulations in Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the CFR to grant waivers based on certain characteristics of the operator - for instance, the operator's ``demonstrated financial hardship,'' the operator's delivery of service to an area prone to natural disasters, or most often, the operator's commitment to migrate to an all-digital network before the digital transition date for broadcast television. We concur in this Order
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-132A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-132A1.pdf
                    • such leased spectrum. � 90.1432 Conditions for waiver to allow limited and temporary wideband operations in the 700 MHz Public Safety spectrum. (a) Wideband operations in the 700 MHz Public Safety spectrum. Wideband operations are prohibited in the public safety allocation of the 700 MHz band public safety spectrum except where the Commission has granted a waiver pursuant to �� 1.3 and 1.925 of this chapter and subject to the additional conditions and requirements specified below. Grants of waiver are restricted to the deployment of a wideband system in the consolidated narrowband portion or the internal public safety guard band portion of the public safety broadband spectrum. Where spectrum in the narrowband segment or internal guard band segment is unavailable for
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-132A1_Erratum.doc
                    • such leased spectrum. � 90.1432 Conditions for waiver to allow limited and temporary wideband operations in the 700 MHz Public Safety spectrum. (a) Wideband operations in the 700 MHz Public Safety spectrum. Wideband operations are prohibited in the public safety allocation of the 700 MHz band public safety spectrum except where the Commission has granted a waiver pursuant to �� 1.3 and 1.925 of this chapter and subject to the additional conditions and requirements specified below. Grants of waiver are restricted to the deployment of a wideband system in the consolidated narrowband portion or the internal public safety guard band portion of the public safety broadband spectrum. Where spectrum in the narrowband segment or internal guard band segment is unavailable for
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-138A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-138A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-138A1.txt
                    • changing the certification to correct the station's mistake in citing the incorrect application on its Form 381 certification. In addition, cumulative changes to station parameters made over the course of establishing the final DTV Table may also affect the level of interference caused to other stations. The Commission may waive its rules when good cause is demonstrated. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied 409 U.S. 1027 (1972). See Seventh Further Notice, 21 FCC Rcd at 12123, App. A. See Comments of Trinity Christian Center of Santa Ana, Inc., filed Jan. 10, 2007, at 3. See Seventh Further Notice, 21 FCC Rcd at 12123, App. A. This commenter also
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-138A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-138A2.txt
                    • 21 20 105 529 70813 303640 873627 23682 1116 0 83740ALMOBILE 23 337 574 75124 303645 873843 37989 1283 0.1 73187ALMOBILE 5 271000 581 74800 304120 874949 45411 1406 0.3 721ALMOBILE 42 41 199 185 303933 875333 16361 912 0 13993ALMONTGOMERY 12 12 24.9 507 74369 315828 860944 31615 788 0.5 73642ALMONTGOMERY 20 161000 518 29552 315828 860944 37703 829 1.3 706ALMONTGOMERY 26 27 568 176 322255 861733 18025 549 3.7 72307ALMONTGOMERY 32 32 199 545 75049 320830 864443 28378 579 0.7 60829ALMONTGOMERY 45 46 500 308 28430 322413 861147 21909 641 0.3 711ALMOUNT CHEAHA 7 7 24.1 610 80203 332907 854833 42633 2370 3.4 11113ALOPELIKA 66 47 136 539 74487 321916 844728 24321 662 1.3 32851ALOZARK 34 33 15 151
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-13A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-13A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-13A1.txt
                    • FAQ, available at http://www.mplsrc.com/faq1.shtml#MPLS%20History (visited July 31, 2006). See SBC/AT&T Order, 20 FCC Rcd at 18322, para. 57. See SBC/AT&T Order, 20 FCC Rcd at 18322, para. 58; Verizon/MCI Order, 20 FCC Rcd at 18464, para. 58; Qwest Jan. 16, 2007 Ex Parte Letter, Attachs. 3-4. From 1997 through 2002, the number of Frame Relay ports more than tripled to 1.3 million; since then, however, the market has shifted to IP-VPNs, and Frame Relay port growth has dropped. See TIA 2006 Market Review at 140. From 2000 through 2005, ATM service revenues nearly tripled, from $1.1 billion to $2.70 billion. Id. at 143. The number of ATM ports in the United States reached a peak of 40,000 in 2005, however, and
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-149A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-149A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-149A1.txt
                    • � 160, ACS's Petition for forbearance IS GRANTED to the extent described herein and otherwise IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 2, 4(i), 4(j), 201, 202, 203, 205, 218, and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 152, 154(i), 154(j), 201, 202, 203, 205, 218, and 403, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, sections 54.901(a), 54.903 and 69.3(e)(9) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 54.901(a), 54.903 and 69.3(e)(9) ARE WAIVED to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHERED ORDERED that, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. � 160, and section 1.103(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-159A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-159A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-159A1.txt
                    • 214, 220(a), 251, 252, 271, 272, and 303(r) that AT&T's Petition for Forbearance, filed June 2, 2006, IS GRANTED in part, to the extent set forth herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 201-204, 251(g), and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i)-154(j), 201-204, 251(g), and 303(r), and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that the Equal Access Scripting Requirement IS WAIVED as applied to Southern New England Telephone Company and the General Telephone Operating Companies as described in the Memorandum Opinion and Order, effective on August 31, 2007. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-162A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-162A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-162A1.txt
                    • relocate the 1.9 GHz BAS incumbents, Sprint Nextel's obligation is to complete relocation of all BAS facilities by September 7, 2007. On September 4, 2007, Sprint Nextel, MSTV, NAB and SBE filed a Joint Petition requesting that the Commission waive the current BAS transition completion date for an additional twenty-nine months. On our own motion, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, we hereby waive the deadline by which Sprint Nextel must complete relocation of the broadcast auxiliary service to frequencies above 2025 MHz for a period of 60 days (i.e., the new deadline will become November 6, 2007). This will provide the Commission with time to consider the issues raised by the Joint Petition. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-16A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-16A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-16A1.txt
                    • in Crown Castle's Initial Market Deployment Plan, and to the portions of the two CMAs that encompass the White Mountain Apache Reservation, 75% of the population of which OP LLC must serve by August 31, 2007. Further, we will require OP LLC to coordinate the proposed operation or modification of any high-power (i.e., above 2 kW EIRP) base station within 1.3 kilometers of any National Weather Service (NWS) radiosonde receive sites, which are located in the adjacent 1675-1683 MHz band. We also we will require OP LLC to consult with the National Science Foundation (NSF) before operating or modifying any high-power base station within 185 kilometers of key radio astronomy facilities that perform observations in the adjacent 1660.5-1670 MHz band. BACKGROUND
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-174A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-174A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-174A1.txt
                    • did not present an analysis of the reduction in carrier-to-noise-plus-interference ratio (C/(N+I)), which is the more appropriate signal quality metric that determines the satellite link performance. Waiver. Finally, both DIRECTV and SES Americom suggest that where the existing flexibility adopted in our Report and Order is insufficient, EchoStar and other applicants should avail themselves of the waiver process under Section 1.3 of our R ules. As we have concluded, adopting the flexibility proposed by EchoStar best serves the public interest. There is no public policy benefit from resolving this issue in a piecemeal fashion through individual waiver requests. Acting here, rather than through individual waiver requests, provides regulatory certainty now to all parties. Consequently, we conclude that adopting the additional flexibility
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-177A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-177A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-177A1.txt
                    • at (202) 418-0530, TTY (202) 418-0432. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 1, 4(i)-(k), 4(o), 201, 218, 219, 301, 303(g), 303(j), 303(r), 332, 403, 405, 621(b)(3) and 621(d) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i)-(k), 154(o), 201, 218, 219, 301, 303(g), 303(j), 303(r), 332, 403, 405, 541(b)(3), and 541(d), and Sections 1.3 and 1.106 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.106, that this Order on Reconsideration in EB Docket No. 06-119 and WC Docket No. 06-63 IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Petitions for Reconsideration filed by The American Association of Paging Carriers, the DAS Forum, MetroPCS Communications, Inc., NextG Networks, Inc., PCIA - The Wireless Infrastructure Association
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-182A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-182A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-182A1.txt
                    • & Sovereign Consulting, LLC at 4; South Carolina Budget and Control Board 3. See Comments of South Carolina Budget and Control Board 3. Id.; see also Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Third Report and Order and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 26912, 26928, para. 40 (2003). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (providing that the Commission's rules may be waived for good cause). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 < _ < ��PNG r v ��"r�9 I'6� �d�Y�͆aX ���; Wh� �X,�aX���y�]\\.W`h���va6l! �v"]�V�at�������-``````�"m(c)x<��G�<���={-N��J%t�<== �"""x ҍ� � ��(c)���!��'' �R)&� �A�� "���\��v`` � 6� �� N �f �L...=�f �b
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-188A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-188A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-188A1.txt
                    • Public Notice is included as Appendix A. See Intermodal Number Portability Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 23698, para. 1. We note that a carrier may petition the Commission for additional time or waiver of the intermodal porting requirements if it can provide substantial, credible evidence that there are special circumstances that warrant departure from existing rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 52.25(e). In addition, under section 251(f)(2) of the Act, a LEC with fewer than two percent of the nation's subscriber lines installed in the aggregate nationwide may petition the appropriate state commission for suspension or modification of the requirements of section 251(b). See 47 U.S.C. � 251(f)(2). Further, in light of the court's determination that the Intermodal Number Portability Order
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-192A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-192A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-192A1.txt
                    • 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on or before 30 days after publication of the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in the Federal Register and reply comments on or before 45 days after publication in the Federal Register. he Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the requirements of sections 20.19(c)(1)(ii), 20.19(c)(2)(ii), and 20.19(c)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 20.19(c)(1)(ii), 20.19(c)(2)(ii), 20.19(c)(3)(ii), ARE STAYED until April 18, 2008. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Commission's Consumer Information Bureau, Reference Information Center, SHALL SEND a copy of the Second Report and Order and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, including the IRFA, to the Chief Counsel for
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-193A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-193A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-193A1.txt
                    • introduction of MSS in a timely manner. To allow the Commission the time to consider the record after the plans or proposals are submitted, we also extend the waiver of the deadline by which Sprint Nextel must complete relocation of the broadcast auxiliary service for an additional period of 60 days, on our own motion, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and (j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 C.F.R. �� 154(i) and (j), and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that the waiver of the deadline by which Sprint Nextel must complete relocation of the broadcast auxiliary service to frequencies above 2025 MHz adopted in
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-197A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-197A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-197A1.txt
                    • the impermissible material relationship rule, section 1.2110(b)(3)(iv)(A), 47 C.F.R. � 1.2110(b)(3)(iv)(A), with respect to arrangements for lease or resale (including wholesale) of the spectrum capacity of the D Block license. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority granted in Sections 4(i) and 309(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 309(j), and sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, section 1.2110(b)(3)(iv)(A), 47 C.F.R. � 1.2110(b)(3)(iv)(A), is WAIVED to the extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to � 155(c) and 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131(c) and 0.331, the Chief of the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau IS GRANTED DELEGATED AUTHORITY to prescribe and set forth procedures for the implementation
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-200A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-200A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-200A1.txt
                    • appropriate to ensure that both manufacturers and carriers provide convenient access to up-to-date and accurate information regarding available hearing aid-compatible digital handsets as we monitor the ongoing deployment and marketing of such handsets. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 1 and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that this Memorandum Opinion and Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 1 and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the Motion for
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-206A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-206A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-206A1.txt
                    • DVR, high-speed Internet service, and digital telephone service. Northland Cable Television operates smaller market cable systems in Georgia, South Carolina, North Carolina, Mississippi, Alabama, Texas, Washington, California, and Idaho. Northland offers digital video service, high-speed Internet service, and digital telephone service, but does not appear to offer HDTV, VOD, or DVR service. Cebridge Connections provides cable service to more than 1.3 million subscribers in 15 states and offers digital video service, HDTV, DVR, high-speed Internet service, and telephone service, but does not appear to offer VOD. Like Cebridge, GCI, which operates cable systems in Alaska, offers digital video service, HDTV, DVR, high-speed Internet service, and digital telephone service, but does not appear to offer VOD. CableAmerica serves 50,000 subscribers in Arizona,
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-217A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-217A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-217A1.txt
                    • acquired, provided that the lender does not hold an equity interest in the licensee or any related person, does not hold an option or other right to acquire an equity interest in the future and has not received a promise of such a right, unless such combined interest has been granted subject to an appropriate waiver as provided at Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules; and (2)(i) The interest holder also holds an interest in a broadcast licensee, cable television system, newspaper, or other media outlet operating in the same market that is subject to the broadcast multiple ownership or cross-ownership rules and is attributable under paragraphs of this note other than this paragraph (i); or (ii) The interest holder supplies
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-219A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-219A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-219A1.txt
                    • of DBS subscribers will increase the size of the open field available to a network, which will be reflected in our calculations by a reduction of cable operators' share of the MVPD market. This effect is real, not hypothetical. From 2001 through 2005, the number of MVPD subscribers increased by 8.16 million, but the number of cable subscribers decreased by 1.3 million, and cable's share of MVPD subscribers declined from 77.54 percent to 69.41 percent. During the same period, DBS providers added 10 million subscribers, and their share of MVPD subscribers increased from 18.67 percent to 27.72 percent. See 2005 Video Competition Report, Table B-1. There is no simple rule concerning the relationship between the level of competition in the downstream
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-34A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-34A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-34A1.txt
                    • Consumer-Oriented Measures. Revenue statistics for SDARS operators show a very high growth rate. Revenue for SDARS in 2002 was approximately $21 million, but the industry generated revenues of over $800 million in 2005. During this time period, ARPU has increased slowly. For example, Sirius' monthly charge rose from $9.48 in 2003 to $10.34 in 2005 while industry subscribers rose from 1.3 million in 2003 to 9.2 million in 2005. Fixed Satellite Broadband Services Two-way satellite-based fixed broadband service was first offered only in 2005, and satellite-based broadband of all types represents less that 1 percent of the U.S. broadband subscriber base. The sector does show growing subscriber up-take and increasing competition among three emerging providers. WildBlue began to offer service in
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-35A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-35A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-35A1.txt
                    • integrity of the program and will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under our procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that the Requests for Review and Requests for Waiver filed by the Petitioners as listed in Appendices A and B ARE GRANTED and REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-37A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-37A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-37A1.txt
                    • U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, that the Requests for Review or Waiver filed by the Petitioners as listed in the Appendix ARE GRANTED to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that sections 54.504(b)(2)(iii)-(iv), (c)(1)(iv)-(v) and 54.508(c)-(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 54.504(b)(2)(iii)-(iv), (c)(1)(iv)-(v) and 54.508(c)-(d), ARE WAIVED to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254,
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-43A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-43A1.txt
                    • alter information or technology stored on or by software, hardware, a system or a network; and (iii) alter the physical or logical state of software, hardware, a system or a network (e.g., turning it on or off, changing configuration, removing or adding components or connections). 1.2. "Am�rica M�vil" has the meaning given to it in the Preamble to this Agreement. 1.3. "Call Associated Data" means any information related to a Domestic Communication or related to the sender or recipient of Domestic Communication, to the extent the Domestic Companies maintain such information in the normal course of business. Call Associated Data includes without limitation: subscriber identification; called party number; calling-party number; start time; end time; call duration; feature invocation and deactivation; feature
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-51A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-51A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-51A1.txt
                    • petitioners fall short of the Commission's criteria for waiver of the hearing aid compatibility requirements. Accordingly, we find that petitioners' failure to meet these important requirements should be addressed through the enforcement process. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 1 and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that this Memorandum Opinion and Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 1 and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the Petition for
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-5A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-5A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-5A1.txt
                    • is entitled to a limited extension of the deadline by which it was required to achieve 95% penetration among its subscribers of location-capable handsets. Accordingly, we grant, nunc pro tunc, Illinois Valley's request for additional waiver and extend the date by which Illinois Valley must achieve 95% penetration to December 12, 2006. ordering clauses IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the foregoing Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that Illinois Valley's Request for Additional Limited Waiver and Extension of the Handset Penetration Deadline of the Commission's Phase II E911 Rules IS GRANTED, nunc pro tunc. The deadline for compliance with section 20.18(g)(1)(v) of the Commission's rules is
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-60A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-60A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-60A1.txt
                    • the integrity of the program and will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under our procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed by the petitioners as listed in the Appendix ARE GRANTED and REMANDED to USAC for further consideration to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934,
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-61A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-61A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-61A1.txt
                    • integrity of the program and will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed by the petitioners as listed in Appendix A and B ARE GRANTED AND REMANDED to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-63A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-63A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-63A1.txt
                    • integrity of the program and will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 54.722(a), that 47. C.F.R. �� 54.504(b)(4) and (c) ARE WAIVED, to the extent detailed herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 1.3, and 54.722(a) of
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-64A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-64A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-64A1.txt
                    • aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under our own procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Macomb Intermediate School District Technology Consortium, Clinton Township, Michigan, IS DENIED in part and GRANTED in part and IS REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-6A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-6A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-6A1.txt
                    • opportunity to more fully develop the specific elements of its infrastructure proposal, particularly where only a specific non-profit nationwide backbone provider will fulfill the applicant's network plan or meet its need to access a particular institution that is currently connected to only one nationwide network. For these reasons, where an applicant proposes to pre-select Internet2 or NLR, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, we waive, on our own motion, the rural health care program's competitive bidding and cost-effectiveness rules for pilot program applicants. Alternatively, those applicants who have not yet selected a backbone provider at the time of their applications may request funding for such a connection and, if selected, seek bids through the established rural health care competitive
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-70A1.txt
                    • that proceeding, the National Association of Broadcasters (``NAB'') indicated that there are approximately 69 million television sets are not connected to any MVPD service. Specifically, NAB reported that nearly 19.6 million households rely solely on over-the-air broadcast television, and there are approximately 45.5 million sets in those homes. NAB states that ``in these 19.6 million over-the-air households, there are approximately 1.3 million over-the-air digital sets.'' Thus, according to NAB, ``[t]here are roughly 18.7 million over-the-air households with only analog sets, and these households have about 44.2 million analog sets.'' NAB reports that an additional 23.5 million television sets in 14.7 million MVPD households remain unconnected to the MVPD service. NAB states that this 2006 data showing large numbers of over-the-air television
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-73A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-73A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-73A1.txt
                    • contributions. In light of the seriousness, duration and scope of Carrera's violations, we conclude that the forfeiture proposed in the Carrera NAL and revised as set forth above to $345,900 is warranted. V. ORDERING CLAUSES 20. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 303(r) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 303(r), and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, Carrera's Petition for Waiver is GRANTED. 21. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT, pursuant to section 503(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 503(b), and section 1.80 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.80, Carrera IS LIABLE FOR A MONETARY FORFEITURE in the amount of $345,900 for willfully and repeatedly violating the
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-76A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-76A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-76A1.txt
                    • may have sufficiently similar characteristics to the 17 GHz receivers. See Letter from John M. R. Kneuer, Assistant Secretary for Communications and Information, United States Department of Commerce to Kevin J. Martin, Chairman, Federal Communications Commission, dated March 21, 2007. Id. Id. Id. See also 47 U.S.C. � 154(j); 5 U.S.C. � 552(b)(1); 47 C.F.R. � 0.603(a); 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; Bendix Aviation Corp. v. FCC, 272 F. 2d 533, 536-537 (D.C. Cir. 1959), cert. denied sub nom. Aeronautical Radio, Inc. v. United States, 361 U.S. 965 (1960). Id. at A-15. First Space Station Licensing Reform Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 10863, para. 276. First Space Station Licensing Reform Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 10863-6, paras. 275-284. See Establishment of Policies
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-77A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-77A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-77A1.txt
                    • the Petitioners to the Commission's Enforcement Bureau for appropriate actions. Finally, we deny CPK and Litchfield of Kentucky's requests for further waiver of the handset deployment and activation deadlines and admonish these carriers for their noncompliance with Section 20.18(g)(1)(i)-(iv). ordering clauses IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the ENHANCE 911 Act, Pub. L. No. 108-494, 118 Stat. 3986 (2004), and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the foregoing Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Waiver of the Location-Capable Handset Benchmark Deadlines filed by Cellular Phone of Kentucky, Inc. IS GRANTED IN PART, subject to the conditions and reporting requirements specified herein, AND IS OTHERWISE DENIED. The deadline for compliance
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-95A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-95A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-95A1.txt
                    • waiver. There shall be no synchronization (e.g., common clocking) among transmitter tags. This waiver shall apply to all models of the Sapphire DART produced by MSSI as described herein provided no major changes are made to the transmitter circuitry that would increase the device's duty cycle, radiated power, or bandwidth. CONCLUSION AND ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, pursuant to authority in Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. section 1.3, and Sections 4(i), 302, 303(e), and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. Sections 154(i), 302, 303(e), and 303(r), IT IS ORDERED that the Request for Waiver filed by Multispectral Solutions, Inc. IS GRANTED consistent with the terms of this Order. This action is effective upon release of
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-9A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-9A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-9A1.txt
                    • the date by which Washington RSA 8 must achieve 95% penetration to August 8, 2007. We further impose the conditions and reporting requirements described herein to ensure that Washington RSA 8 achieves full compliance with the Commission's E911 requirements. ordering clauses IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the ENHANCE 911 Act, Pub. L. No. 108-494, 118 Stat. 3986 (2004), and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the foregoing Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Request for Additional Limited Waiver and Extension of the Handset Penetration Deadline of the Commission's Phase II E911 Rules by Washington RSA No. 8 Limited Partnership IS GRANTED IN PART, subject to the conditions and reporting requirements
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-117A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-117A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-117A1.txt
                    • 710 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 303(r), and 610, and Section 1.108 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.108, this Order on Reconsideration and Erratum IS HEREBY ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority of section 4(i) of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the requirements of sections 20.19(c)(1)(ii), 20.19(c)(2)(ii), and 20.19(c)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 20.19(c)(1)(ii), 20.19(c)(2)(ii), 20.19(c)(3)(ii), ARE STAYED until 30 days after publication of the First Report and Order in the Federal Register. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Commission's Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau, Reference Information Center, SHALL SEND
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-121A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-121A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-121A1.txt
                    • 4. Petitioners contended that such a result was unfair since the first quarter revenues were not being used to calculate universal service contributions. Id. Id. Id. Id. at 13852, n.15. Id. See CTIA Reconsideration Petition at 3. Id. at 4. Id. at 6 (citing, for example, submission of cost data by cable operators, implementation of payphone compensation rules). 47 C.F.R. �1.3. Northeast Cellular Telephone v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). See True-Up Waiver Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 13581, para. 4. Id. Id. at 13582, para. 7. CTIA Reconsideration Petition at 6. See Joint Petition of CTIA and The Rural Cellular Association for Suspension or Waiver of the Location-Capable Handset Penetration Deadline, WT Docket No. 05-288, Order, 22
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-159A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-159A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-159A1.txt
                    • the potential customer base, and the ``self-certification'' as common carriers - were suggested by the Complaint itself, and are not complex. Thus, Verizon has had an adequate opportunity to respond. Accordingly, to the extent that our rules require those facts to be alleged more clearly in the Complaint, we waive those rules for good cause shown. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.721, 1.726. See NARUC I, 525 F.2d at 608. As mentioned previously, ``[o]ne may be a common carrier though the nature of the service rendered is sufficiently specialized as to be of possible use to only a fraction of the total population.'' NARUC I, 525 F.2d at 608. This undermines the probative value of the fact that the Comcast and
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-173A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-173A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-173A1.txt
                    • Docket No. 02-6, Public Notice, 21 FCC Rcd 12310 (2006) (Oct. 2006 Public Notice); 2008 ESL; Release of Funding Year 2007 Eligible Services List for Schools and Libraries Universal Service Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Public Notice, 22 FCC Rcd 18751 (2007) (Oct. 2007 Public Notice). See Oct. 2006 Public Notice; Oct. 2007 Public Notice; see also 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (providing that the Commission's rules may be waived for good cause). See Oct. 2006 Public Notice at 1; Oct. 2007 Public Notice at 2. See Oct. 2006 Public Notice at 1; Oct. 2007 Public Notice at 2. See Oct. 2006 Public Notice at 1; Oct. 2007 Public Notice at 2. As noted above, during the pleading cycles established for the
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-193A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-193A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-193A1.txt
                    • Government Accountability Office pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. � 801(a)(1)(A). Additional Information , of the Media Bureau, 202-418-7200. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that, pursuant to authority found in Sections 4(i), 4(j), 303(r), 614, and 615 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 303(r), 534, and 535, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, this Fourth Report and Order is HEREBY ADOPTED and shall become effective 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that cable systems with (1) 2,500 or fewer subscribers that are not affiliated with a cable operator serving more than 10% of all MVPD subscribers, or (2) an
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-210A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-210A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-210A1.txt
                    • personnel. Finally, because the provision of section 64.605(c) waived herein terminates as of December 31, 2008, the waiver granted herein to VRS providers shall also terminate on that date. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in section 225 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 225, and sections 0.141, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.141, 0.361, 1.3, that this Order is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Limited Waiver of Interim Section 64.605(c) of the Commission's Rules, filed by Sorenson Communications, Inc. on July 11, 2008, is granted to the extent described above and is extended to all VRS providers. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-246A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-246A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-246A1.txt
                    • by the system with the contention protocol. For the conditions assumed in the SIA study, this reduction mostly offsets the outages that may be caused by the multiple simultaneous transmissions which occur when multiple earth stations simultaneously seek access. Specifically, there was a decrease in unavailability in five of the six case studies examined in the SIA study, ranging from 1.3 percent to 5.1 percent. In the one case of an increase in unavailability, SIA's study shows that increase to be de minimis. The SIA study also shows that a system meeting the mask proposed by the Commission in the Third Further Notice would increase the unavailability of a "static system," a VSAT system that does not employ a contention protocol,
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-254A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-254A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-254A1.txt
                    • provide ATC, we conclude that Globalstar operations do not meet the spare-satellite gating requirement with respect to S-band at the present time. Waivers Globalstar requests interim waiver of the coverage, integration and spare-satellite rules in the event we conclude, as we do, that its current MSS operation and modified ATC proposal do not fully comport with those gating requirements. Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules states that the Commission may waive its rules for ``good cause shown.'' Good cause for interim waiver exists ``where particular facts would make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest.'' To make this public interest finding, the waiver cannot undermine the purposes of the rule, and there must be a stronger public interest benefit in granting
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-256A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-256A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-256A1.txt
                    • consider, among other things, the extent to which the area is currently served by other affiliates of the same network. We believe that providing the flexibility to apply within six months after the transition date will allow stations to deal with unforeseen circumstances that come to light when they make their transition. See supra � 11. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (waiver requests). 47 C.F.R. � 73.622(i). See, e.g., Seventh Report and Order, 22 FCC Rcd at 15672, app B; First Order on Reconsideration, 23 FCC Rcd at 4311, app B. See Appendix B - Rule Changes; 47 C.F.R. � 73.626(c)(2). In November 2004, licensees filed certifications via FCC Form 381 in order to define their proposed post-transition facilities. In these
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-262A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-262A1.txt
                    • WC Docket No. 06-122; Intercarrier Compensation for ISP-Bound Traffic, WC Docket 99-68; Establishing Just and Reasonable Rates for Local Exchange Carriers, WC Docket No. 07-135, October 20, 2008. 11 The Commission estimates there were about 40 million multi-line business lines that companies reported as qualified to receive Subscriber Line Charges in 2006, and another 9.7 non-primary residential lines. See Table 1.3 in ``Trends in Telephone Service'', Industry Analysis Division, August 2008. 12 Here we assume 86 million SLC-qualified primary residential and single line business lines, 9 million non-primary residential lines, and 40 million multi-line business access lines. Based on the current ratios of the residential-to-multiline SLCs ($6.50/$9.20 = 0.7), the increase in the multi-line business SLC under this scenario would be
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-263A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-263A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-263A1.txt
                    • not otherwise possible, at lower emission levels than are provided for under the rules. It contends that to the extent that the rules block this technology, they are inequitable, burdensome and contrary to the public interest. UltraVision believes that its proposed separation distances would help address all of MSTV's concerns. DISCUSSION We are authorized to grant a waiver under Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules if the petitioner demonstrates good cause for such action. Good cause, in turn, may be found and a waiver granted ``where particular facts would make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest.'' To make this public interest determination, the waiver cannot undermine the purposes of the rule, and there must be a stronger public interest benefit
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-265A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-265A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-265A1.txt
                    • Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Public Notice, 23 FCC Rcd 11769 (2008) (July 31st Public Notice). 47 C.F.R. � 54.422; see also Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Third Report and Order and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 26912, 26928, para. 40 (2003). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (providing that the Commission's rules may be waived for good cause). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 (c) � ��PNG r v ��"r�9 I'6� �d�Y�͆aX ���; Wh� �X,�aX���y�]\\.W`h���va6l! �v"]�V�at�������-``````�"m(c)x<��G�<���={-N��J%t�<== �"""x ҍ� � ��(c)���!��'' �R)&� �A�� "���\��v`` � 6� �� ������������������������������������������������������������������������ ������ �� �f �L...=�f
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-275A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-275A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-275A1.txt
                    • See TDI Coalition Further Notice Comments at 26-27 (supporting use of the Commission's ancillary jurisdiction over point-to-point services in the context of CPNI requirements). 47 U.S.C. � 225(b)(1). 47 U.S.C. � 255(b). Id. 47 U.S.C. � 151 (emphasis added). See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. �� 64.604(a)(3); 64.605. Generally, the Commission's rules may be waived for good cause shown. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular); see also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969). Waiver of the Commission's rules is appropriate only if special
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-28A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-28A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-28A1.txt
                    • Callers Hung Up in a Digital Country, NYTimes.com, May 3, 2006 (citing Ana Hermoso, an analyst at Informa Telecoms & Media, a research firm in London). Using a range of 2.3 million (Informa estimate) to 3.2 million (Eleventh Report estimate) for analog-only subscribers from 2005, and assuming that all new subscribers in 2006 were digital, we generate a range of 1.3 to .95 percent analog-only subscribers by the end of 2006. Eleventh Report, at 11011. Verizon Wireless Analog Sunset Report, Mar. 2, 2007, at 3; AT&T Mobility LLC F/K/A Cingular Wireless LLC Second Analog Sunset Report, Feb. 26, 2007, at 11; Alltel Cellular AMPS Report, Mar. 19, 2007, at 1. All of the analog sunset reports are available of the FCC's
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-2A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-2A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-2A1.txt
                    • in holding further discussions with BAS licensees to find ways to share use of the spectrum before the transition would be completed under the plan. We extend the waiver of the deadline by which Sprint Nextel must complete relocation of the broadcast auxiliary service for an additional period of 30 days, on our own motion, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (i.e., the new deadline will become February 4, 2008). We encourage MSS operators and the BAS licensees to continue discussing ways for the parties to share use of the spectrum before the transition would be completed under the plan. We will also continue to review the Consensus Plan and the comments filed in response to it during this time. Accordingly,
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-30A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-30A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-30A1.txt
                    • ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) WT Docket No. 02-55 ET Docket No. 00-258 ET Docket No. 95-18 ORDER Adopted: February 4, 2008 Released: February 4, 2008 By the Commission: We extend for an additional thirty days (i.e., to March 5, 2008), on our own motion, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, our waiver of the deadline by which Sprint Nextel Corporation (Sprint Nextel) is required to complete the transition of the broadcast auxiliary service (BAS) to frequencies above 2025 MHz. This will provide additional time for the Commission to consider a Joint Petition for Waiver of Sprint Nextel, the Association for Maximum Service Television, Inc. (MSTV), the National Association of Broadcasters
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-31A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-31A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-31A1.txt
                    • therefore grant all affected entities additional time to implement the Declaratory Ruling in a manner that allows for an orderly transition to these requirements. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 251 and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i)-(j), 251, 303(r) and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the request of Embarq for a waiver of the deadline for compliance with the LNP validation requirements until September 30, 2008 IS GRANTED as described above. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, on the Commission's own motion, that the deadline for compliance with the LNP validation requirements is hereby waived for all other affected
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-49A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-49A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-49A1.txt
                    • LERG. Similarly, absent any evidence of problems, we decline Qwest's request that we impose a definition regarding ``the relevant market.'' Ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 3, 4(i), 201-205, 251, 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 153, 154(i), 201-205, 251, and 303(r), and sections 1.3, 1.106, and 61.26 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 1.106, and 61.26, the petitions for waiver filed by SouthEast and PrairieWave ARE DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for clarification filed by Cox IS GRANTED to the extent discussed herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary APPENDIX Comments and Replies PRAIRIEWAVE PETITION Comments and Oppositions:
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-56A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-56A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-56A1.txt
                    • Review of the Commission's Rules and Policies Affecting the Conversion to Digital Television, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 22 FCC Rcd 9478, 9485 (2007) (noting that in connection with the 2006 Competition Report, NAB indicated that there were nearly 19.6 million households relying solely on over-the-air broadcast television, and that these households owned approximately 45.5 million sets of which only approximately 1.3 million were digital sets). Benton at note 9 (citing May 2007 findings from Leichtman Research Group, Inc. that 9% of TV sets in cable households are broadcast-only, and 19% of TV sets in DBS households are broadcast-only, representing approximately 35 million television sets). Compare CEA at 4 (reporting that there are roughly 5.5 million households subscribing to cable and satellite
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-67A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-67A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-67A1.txt
                    • that these petitioners' failure to meet these important requirements should be addressed through the enforcement process. Further, we expect those petitioners not yet in compliance to come into compliance as soon as possible. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 1 and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that this Memorandum Opinion and Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 1 and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925, that the Petition for
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-72A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-72A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-72A1.txt
                    • 8, 2007, at 1-2, n.3 (citing FCC File No. BMPCDT-20070104ACH). Id. at 2. Id. Id. See Ion January 22 Ex Parte Letter at Attachment, Board of County Comm'rs v. Canyon Area Residents for the Env't, No. 06SC777, 2007 WL 4153502 (Colo. Nov. 26, 2007) (denying certiorari). The Commission may waive its rules when good cause is demonstrated. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied 409 U.S. 1027 (1972). See Seventh Report and Order, 22 FCC Rcd at 15647, App A. See Petition for Reconsideration by Winston Broadcasting Network, Inc., filed Oct. 25, 2007 at 1-2. See also FCC File No. BLCDT-20070430AXX (WBNX-DT license). See Seventh Report and Order, 22
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-72A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-72A2.txt
                    • 303640 873627 23682 1116 0 83740AL MOBILE 23 337 574 75124 303645 873843 38025 1283 0 73187AL MOBILE 5 271000 581 74800 304120 874949 45375 1406 0.3 721AL MOBILE 42 41 199 185 303933 875333 16357 912 0.1 13993AL MONTGOMERY 12 12 24.9 507 74369 315828 860944 31615 788 0.5 73642AL MONTGOMERY 20 161000 518 29552 315828 860944 37703 829 1.3 706AL MONTGOMERY 26 27 600 179 322255 861733 18271 555 3.7 72307AL MONTGOMERY 32 32 199 545 75049 320830 864443 28378 579 0.7 60829AL MONTGOMERY 45 46 500 308 28430 322413 861147 21909 641 0.3 711AL MOUNT CHEAHA 7 7 24.1 610 80203 332907 854833 42613 2362 3.8 11113AL OPELIKA 66 47 136 539 74487 321916 844728 24321 662 1.3
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-73A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-73A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-73A1.txt
                    • the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002,[1] we seek specific comment on how we might ``further reduce the information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees.'' . ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and (j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 C.F.R. �� 154(i) and (j), and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that the waiver of the deadline by which Sprint Nextel must complete relocation of the broadcast auxiliary service to frequencies above 2025 MHz adopted in FCC 07-162, IS EXTENDED until March 5, 2009. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Joint Petition is GRANTED IN PART consistent with the terms of this order
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-81A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-81A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-81A1.txt
                    • undue hardship on NECA in developing its annual access tariff filing. ordering clauseS Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 201-203, and 254(g) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 160, 201-203, and 254(g), that the Windstream petition for waiver IS GRANTED to the extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that section 69.3(i)(1) of the Commission's rules IS WAIVED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Windstream Petition for Conversion to Price Cap Regulation and for Limited Waiver Relief, WC Docket No. 07-171 (filed Aug.
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-91A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-91A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-91A1.txt
                    • interest to provide additional time to consider all options with respect to the D Block spectrum. Therefore, we elect not to re-offer the D Block license immediately in Auction 76. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority granted in Sections 4(i) and 309(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 309(j), and sections 1.3 of the Commission's rules, we direct the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau to not proceed with offering the Upper 700 MHz Band D Block license until further notice. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary The frequency block under consideration here is referred to simply as the D Block, without designating that it is located in the upper portion (the 758-763 and
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-105A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-105A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-105A1.txt
                    • Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 26912, 26928, para. 40 (2003) (Schools and Libraries Third Report and Order). Releasing the ESL with this report and order fulfills the purpose of the rule; nevertheless, to the extent necessary, we waive the public notice requirement in section 54.522 to release the ESL with this report and order. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. These proposals would require revisions to sections 54.502, 54.503, 54.506, 54.517 and 54.518 of the Commission's rules. See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.502, 54.503, 54.506, 54.517 and 54.518. Proposed revised rules are attached as Appendix C. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.522. 47 C.F.R. �� 54.502, 54.503, 54.517. 47 U.S.C. � 254(c)(1), (c)(3), (h)(2)(A). Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-13A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-13A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-13A1.txt
                    • relocation by extending the relocation deadline to March 5, 2009, and holding in abeyance the parties' original waiver request, which asked that the relocation deadline be extended to February 7, 2010. By the Supplemental Request, the parties renew their request to extend the BAS relocation deadline to February 7, 2010. 3. On our own motion, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, we hereby waive the deadline by which Sprint Nextel must complete relocation of the broadcast auxiliary service to frequencies above 2025 MHz for a period of 45 days (i.e., the new deadline will become April 19, 2009). This will provide the Commission with time to consider the issues raised by the Supplemental Request and the comments regarding the Supplemental Request.
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-16A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-16A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-16A1.txt
                    • Alaska to regions previously devoid of wireless infrastructure, thus confirming the Commission's conclusion in the Interim Cap Order that competitive ETCs are not merely providing complementary services in Covered Locations. GCI also asserts that allowing uncapped support for all competitive ETC lines in Covered Locations would have a de minimis impact on the universal service fund. Discussion Pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, we find that there is good cause to waive, on our own motion, the requirement that ``uncapped per line support is limited to one payment per each residential account'' for competitive ETCs that opt into the Covered Locations exception to the interim cap on high-cost support for competitive ETCs. Accordingly, pursuant to the Interim Cap Order,
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-24A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-24A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-24A1.txt
                    • the twelve month period ending December 31, 2000. * * * * * 10. Amend Section 36.154 by revising paragraph (g) to read as follows: � 36.154 Exchange Line Cable and Wire Facilities (C&WF) - Category 1 - apportionment procedures. * * * * * (g) Effective July 1, 2001, through June 30, 2010, all study areas shall apportion Subcategory 1.3 Exchange Line C&WF among the jurisdictions as specified in � 36.154(c). Direct assignment of subcategory Categories 1.1 and 1.2 Exchange Line C&WF to the jurisdictions shall be updated annually as specified in � 36.154(b). * * * * * 11. Amend Section 36.155 by revising paragraph (b) to read as follows: � 36.155 Wideband and exchange trunk (C&WF) - Category
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-35A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-35A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-35A1.txt
                    • ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) WT Docket No. 02-55 ET Docket No. 00-258 ET Docket No. 95-18 ORDER Adopted: April 19, 2009 Released: April 20, 2009 By the Commission: 1. We extend for an additional forty-five days (i.e., to June 3, 2009), on our own motion, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, our waiver of the deadline by which Sprint Nextel Corporation (Sprint Nextel) is required to complete the transition of the broadcast auxiliary service (BAS) to frequencies above 2025 MHz. This will provide additional time to consider a Supplemental Joint Request Concerning the BAS Relocation (Supplemental Request) of Sprint Nextel Corporation, the Association for Maximum Service Television, Inc. (MSTV), the National
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-41A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-41A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-41A1.txt
                    • upgrades, or both); NTCA Reply at 2-3; MIC Comments at 3 (arguing that it would be unreasonable to require rural companies to expand operations beyond normal business hours in order to perform ports, as a typical rural company has few business office or plant employees and very few are likely to be trained to complete port requests). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Id. See, e.g., Embarq Comments at 10-11 (explaining that Embarq experiences significant delays when porting in numbers from other carriers and when asked, many, if not most, carriers state that the intervals are not mandatory or do not apply to them); Verizon Comments at 5-8 (explaining that some providers currently do not meet the standard porting intervals and may even
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-44A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-44A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-44A1.txt
                    • the twelve month period ending December 31, 2000. * * * * * 10. Amend Section 36.154 by revising paragraph (g) to read as follows: � 36.154 Exchange Line Cable and Wire Facilities (C&WF) - Category 1 - apportionment procedures. * * * * * (g) Effective July 1, 2001, through June 30, 2010, all study areas shall apportion Subcategory 1.3 Exchange Line C&WF among the jurisdictions as specified in � 36.154(c). Direct assignment of subcategory Categories 1.1 and 1.2 Exchange Line C&WF to the jurisdictions shall be updated annually as specified in � 36.154(b). * * * * * 11. Amend Section 36.155 by revising paragraph (b) to read as follows: � 36.155 Wideband and exchange trunk (C&WF) - Category
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-45A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-45A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-45A1.txt
                    • Cable One further contends that use of CableCARD devices does not present a reasonable solution because such devices are prohibitively costly at ``$300 to $400 per'' device. Finally, Cable One reasserts its position that waiver will further the public interest, for the same reasons provided in the Waiver Request. discussion Cable One makes its request for waiver pursuant to Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's rules, as clarified by the low-cost, limited-capability standard set forth in the Commission's 2005 Deferral Order. As discussed below, we find good cause to grant Cable One's waiver under Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's rules because (1) the limited functionality, one-way device Cable One plans to deploy is unlikely to have a significant
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-46A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-46A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-46A1.txt
                    • operators' obligation to support CableCARD technology. Finally, Evolution states that its waiver request is time-limited as required by Section 629(c) of the Act. discussion Evolution makes its request for waiver pursuant to Section 629(c) of the Communications Act, Section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, and Section 76.1207 of the Commission's rules. Alternatively, Evolution seeks waiver pursuant to Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's rules as clarified by the 2005 Deferral Order. Accordingly, we analyze its request pursuant to the waiver standards set forth in Section 629(c) and under the general waiver provisions found in Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's rules as clarified by the low-cost, limited-capability standard set forth in the Commission's 2005 Deferral Order. As
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-48A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-48A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-48A1.txt
                    • ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) WT Docket No. 02-55 ET Docket No. 00-258 ET Docket No. 95-18 ORDER Adopted: June 3, 2009 Released: June 4, 2009 By the Commission: 1. We extend for an additional seven days (i.e., to June 10, 2009), on our own motion, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, our waiver of the deadline by which Sprint Nextel Corporation (Sprint Nextel) is required to complete the transition of the broadcast auxiliary service (BAS) to frequencies above 2025 MHz. This will provide additional time to consider a Supplemental Joint Request Concerning the BAS Relocation (Supplemental Request) of Sprint Nextel Corporation, the Association for Maximum Service Television, Inc. (MSTV), the National
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-49A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-49A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-49A1.txt
                    • Sections 4(i), 5(c), 303(f), 332, 337 and 405 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 155(c), 303(f), 332, 337 and 405, this Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and (j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 C.F.R. �� 154(i) and (j), and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that the waiver of the deadline by which Sprint Nextel must complete relocation of the broadcast auxiliary service to frequencies above 2025 MHz adopted in FCC 08-73, IS EXTENDED until February 8, 2010. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Supplemental Request is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-64A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-64A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-64A1.txt
                    • as applied to VMES, based on that assumption. We follow the procedures the Commission adopted in the ESV rules. We do not adopt an explicit national security exception for VMES licensees. We find that a better approach would be to consider an applicable request to waive the availability component of the rule for national security reasons. We observe that section 1.3 of the Commission's rules authorizes the Commission to waive its rules for ``good cause shown.'' Waiver is appropriate only if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule and such deviation would better serve the public interest than would strict adherence to the general rule. Generally, the Commission may grant a waiver of its rules in a particular case
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-8A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-8A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-8A1.txt
                    • own motion, we stay the February 17, 2009 deadline for relocating existing narrowband operations to the consolidated narrowband channels (769-775/799-805 MHz) until a new deadline is established in a subsequent order in this proceeding. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and (j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i) and (j), and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that the February 17, 2009 deadline for consolidating existing narrowband operations to the upper half of the 700 MHz Public Safety band (769-775/799-805 MHz) IS STAYED until a new effective deadline is adopted in a subsequent order in this proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the effective date of this Order is
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-91A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-91A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-91A1.txt
                    • public interest because it fulfilled Congress's command to ``promot[e] safety of life.'' For all the reasons discussed above, we deny KBHC's application for review of the Bureau's 800-SUICIDE Order. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), and 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), and 251(e), and sections 1.3 and 52.111 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 52.111, the request of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, a component of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, IS GRANTED and the toll free numbers 1-800-SUICIDE (1-800-784-2433), 1-888-SUICIDE (1-888-784-2433), and 1-877-SUICIDA (1-877-784-2432) are permanently reassigned to SAMHSA. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-100A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-100A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-100A1.txt
                    • undermine the purpose of these obligations. Further, under the plain and unambiguous terms of the suretyship agreement among Safeco, AtContact, and the United States, Safeco was obligated to tender the amount due within 30 business days of the Notice of Default. AtContact's request for a waiver does not alter that requirement. We are authorized to grant a waiver under Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules if the petitioner demonstrates good cause for such action. Good cause, in turn, may be found and a waiver granted ``where particular facts would make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest.'' To make this public interest determination, the waiver cannot undermine the purposes of the rule, and there must be a stronger public interest benefit
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-100A1_Rcd.pdf
                    • the purpose of these obligations.109 Further, under the plain and unambiguous terms of the suretyship agreement among Safeco, AtContact, and the United States, Safeco was obligated to tender the amount due within 30 business days of the Notice of Default. AtContact's request for a waiver does not alter that requirement. 41. We are authorized to grant a waiver under Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules if the petitioner demonstrates good cause for such action.110Good cause, in turn, may be found and a waiver granted "where particular facts would make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest."111To 102Petition for Reconsiderationat 22. 103Id.at 22. 104Id. at 24. 105Id. 106Id. 107Petition for Reconsiderationat 22, citingRainbow DBS Company, LLC,Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-122A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-122A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-122A1.txt
                    • other circumstances justifying waiver. Therefore, we find that the 160 petitioners listed in appendix D did not present special circumstances justifying a waiver of the Commission's rules. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the appeals filed by the petitioners, as listed in appendices A, B, and C, ARE GRANTED and the applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration consistent with this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-129A7.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-129A7.txt
                    • 8.1 12.0 6.9 19.8 30.6 27.7 2.5 0.4 0.0 88.0 100.0 sDSL 0.0 0.0 0.0 44.9 32.5 * 1.6 0.0 * 0.0 100.0 100.0 Other Wireline 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.5 12.3 55.1 8.7 3.1 2.2 3.1 100.0 100.0 Cable Modem 1.1 1.5 2.5 0.8 2.8 4.1 13.9 53.0 22.6 0.3 97.5 100.0 FTTP 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.7 1.4 2.7 24.2 1.3 68.4 1.2 99.8 100.0 Satellite 53.2 35.0 88.3 * * * * 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.7 100.0 Fixed Wireless 14.2 4.5 18.7 20.8 22.3 25.2 9.2 1.9 1.8 0.2 81.3 100.0 Mobile Wireless 30.2 11.9 42.1 17.1 33.3 7.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 57.9 100.0 Power Line and Other 0.0 0.0 0.0 * * * * 0.0 * 0.0 100.0
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-13A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-13A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-13A1.txt
                    • GHz band under the conditions requested is mistaken. The decisions cited by FiberTower were based on the waiver standard in 47 C.F.R. � 1.925 (b)(3) of the Commission's rules which is applicable to wireless radio services governed under specified rule parts for licensed services rather than to Part 15. OET correctly evaluated L-3 SafeView's Part 15 waiver request under Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, which does not require that the applicant demonstrate that it has no reasonable alternative but to operate in the requested band. Rather, Section 1.3 requires that the petitioner only demonstrate good cause for such action. Good cause, in turn, may be found and a waiver granted ``where particular facts would make strict compliance inconsistent with the
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-145A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-145A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-145A1.txt
                    • Global Government Affairs, Motorola, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, at 2-3, dated July 29, 2010 (July 29, 2010 Motorola Letter); July 29, 2010 TIA Letter at 2 See infra, paras. 51-56. See 47 U.S.C. � 610(b)(3) (authorizing waivers of hearing aid compatibility requirements for new telephones for reasons of technological infeasibility or prohibitive costs); see also 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (Commission may waive its rules for good cause). See Nokia Reply Comments at 8; Motorola Ex Parte Comments at 3-4; TIA Ex Parte Comments at 5. See CTIA Ex Parte Comments at 3; RIM Ex Parte Comments at 5; TIA Ex Parte Comments at 6. Motorola Ex Parte Comments at 4. RIM Ex Parte Comments at 3-4. Apple introduced the
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-145A1_Rcd.pdf
                    • from Katie Peters, Director, Global Government Affairs, Motorola, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, at 2-3, dated July 29, 2010 (July 29, 2010 Motorola Letter); July 29,2010 TIA Letterat 2 102See infra, paras. 51-56. 103See 47 U.S.C. � 610(b)(3) (authorizing waivers of hearing aid compatibility requirements for newtelephones for reasons of technological infeasibility or prohibitive costs); see also47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (Commission may waive its rules for good cause). 104SeeNokia Reply Comments at 8; Motorola Ex ParteComments at 3-4; TIA Ex ParteComments at 5. 11184 Federal Communications Commission FCC 10-145 handsets that are currently on the market, it is unnecessary to apply hearing aid compatibility requirements to large entities with limited product lines.105This argument overlooks that each company that offers a
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-146A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-146A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-146A1.txt
                    • of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Section 1.2 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.2, that the Request for Declaratory Ruling filed by Wireless Strategies, Inc. on February 23, 2007 IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's Rules, that the Request for Waiver of Section 101.141(a)(3) filed by the Fixed Wireless Communications Coalition on May 14, 2010 IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that WT Docket Nos. 07-121 and 09-106 ARE TERMINATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Commission's Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau, Reference Information Center, SHALL SEND a copy of
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-14A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-14A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-14A1.txt
                    • 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. Sections 151, 154(i), 303(g), and 303(r), this Notice of Proposed Rule Making IS ADOPTED and the Petition for Rule Making by Siemens Milltronics Process Instruments, Inc. filed on November 3, 2006, is hereby GRANTED to the extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to authority in Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. Section 1.3, and Sections 4(i), 302, and 303(e), of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. Sections 154(i), 302, and 303(e), the Request for Waiver filed by Siemens Milltronics Process Instruments, Inc. filed on November 3, 2006, IS GRANTED, consistent with the terms of this Order. This action is effective upon release
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-155A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-155A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-155A1.txt
                    • USAC carry forward any ``excess payments'' from contributors to the next quarter. In this instance, the excess payments would be due to the reduction in disbursements to Sprint Nextel and Verizon Wireless. The ``next quarter'' refers to USAC's next quarterly demand filing. The effect of this rule is to reduce the contribution factor in the subsequent quarter. Pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, ``any provision of the rules may be waived by the Commission on its own motion . . . if good cause therefor is shown.'' 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. . Without this waiver, we expect that the contribution factor would experience (1) in the first quarter of 2011, a sudden decrease associated with the one-time collection of
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-155A1_Rcd.pdf
                    • USAC carry forward any "excess payments" from contributors to the next quarter. In this instance, the excess payments would be due to the reduction in disbursements to Sprint Nextel and Verizon Wireless. The "next quarter" refers to USAC's next quarterly demand filing. The effect of this rule is to reduce the contribution factor in the subsequent quarter. 46Pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, "any provision of the rules may be waived by the Commission on its own motion . . . if good cause therefor is shown." 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. 47See suprapara. 20. 12862 Federal Communications Commission FCC 10-155 service reform, as we consider the National Broadband Plan.48To ensure appropriate and timely use of these funds, we waive
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-161A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-161A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-161A1.txt
                    • be purchased from BCPI, telephone (202) 488-5300, facsimile (202) 488-5563, TTY (202) 488-5562, e-mail fcc@bcpiweb.com. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 225, 251(e), and 255 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 154(j), 225, 251(e), and 255, and sections 0.91, 0.141, 0.291, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.141, 0.291, 0.361, 1.3, that this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Commission's Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau, Reference Information Center, SHALL SEND a copy of this Notice, including the Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration. FEDERAL
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-16A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-16A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-16A1.txt
                    • cause harmful interference and must accept any interference received pursuant to Section 15.5 of our Rules. Finally, users operating in the 700 MHz Band must comply with the conditions for continued operation in that band during the transition period, including the early clearing procedures discussed above. The waivers will be effective upon the release of the Report and Order. Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules provides that ``[a]ny provision of the rules may be waived by the Commission on its own motion or on petition if good cause therefor is shown'' subject to the provisions of the APA and its own rules. Waiver is appropriate when ``particular facts would make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest.'' A waiver cannot undermine
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-175A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-175A1.txt
                    • set forth in Appendix A, effective thirty (30) days after the publication of this report and order in the Federal Register. 119. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to the authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.723(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Petition for Clarification or Waiver filed by E-rate Central, as identified in paragraph 84 herein, IS DISMISSED. 120. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-186A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-186A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-186A1.txt
                    • dB required by Table 4.2. This compensation requirement would decrease FSS channel capacity by over 99 percent during moderate rain fades, effectively forcing the FSS to cease operation. Even in Los Angeles, a city with a very low average rain rate, an FSS would have to compensate for 7.9 dB of rain fade prior to raising PFDs, compared with the 1.3 dB of non-power ameliorative measures in Table 4.2. This means that, even in cities with low rain rates, FSS operators would be giving up nearly 84 percent of system capacity for a relatively large percent of the time, if PFD in excess of the clear-air values are permitted for only 0.1 percent of the time. 4.4 Trade-off Between the Costs
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-186A1_Rcd.pdf
                    • 5.4 dB required by Table 4.2.146This compensation requirement would decrease FSS channel capacity by over 99 percent during moderate rain fades, effectively forcing the FSS to cease operation. Even in Los Angeles, a city with a very low average rain rate, an FSS would have to compensate for 7.9 dB of rain fade prior to raising PFDs, compared with the 1.3 dB147of non-power ameliorative measures in Table 4.2. This means that, even in cities with low rain rates, FSS operators would be giving up nearly 84 percent of system capacity for a relatively large percent of the time, if PFD in excess of the clear-air values are permitted for only 0.1 percent of the time. 4.4 Trade-off Between the Costs to
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-187A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-187A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-187A1.txt
                    • burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees.'' ; phone 202-418-0214. ORDERING CLAUSES For the reasons discussed above, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), and 5, of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 154(j), 155, sections 34-39 of the Cable Landing License Act, 47 U.S.C. �� 34-39, and Sections 1.3 and 1.115 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.115, that the Petition for Reconsideration of the Commission's Report and Order filed by NASCA is GRANTED to the extent described in this Order and is otherwise DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), and 5 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-187A1_Rcd.pdf
                    • Washington, DC 20554, or via the Internet to Judith-B.Herman@fcc.gov; phone 202-418-0214. VI. ORDERING CLAUSES 26. For the reasons discussed above, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), and 5, of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 154(j), 155, sections 34-39 of the Cable Landing License Act, 47 U.S.C. �� 34-39, and Sections 1.3 and 1.115 of the Commission's 58Id. 595 U.S.C. � 601(3) (incorporating by reference the definition of "small-business concern" in the Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C. � 632). Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. � 601(3), the statutory definition of a small business applies "unless an agency, after consultation with the Office of Advocacy of the Small Business Administration and after opportunity for
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-191A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-191A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-191A1.txt
                    • issuing a statement. introduction Section 11.56 of our rules states in relevant part that ``all EAS Participants must be able to receive CAP-formatted EAS alerts no later than 180 days after FEMA publishes the technical standards and requirements for such FEMA transmissions'' (the CAP reception requirement). In this order, for the reasons set forth herein, we waive pursuant to section 1.3 of our rules the 180-day period for implementation of the CAP reception requirement until September 30, 2011. We believe that this amount of time will prove sufficient for an orderly and efficient implementation of the CAP reception requirement. Background On July 12, 2007, the Commission adopted the EAS Second Report and Order, in which it revised its Part 11 EAS
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-199A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-199A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-199A1.txt
                    • with Commission's rules. We permit GRTI to unfreeze its separations category assignments as of December 2, 2010 and to file revised account information as set forth herein. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154, 254, and pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that sections 36.141, 36.191, 36.3, 36.123-126, 36.152-157, and 36.372-382 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 36.14, 36.191, 36.3, 36.123-126, 36.141, 36.152-157, 36.372-382, 36.191, ARE WAIVED to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 408 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 408,
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-201A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-201A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-201A1.txt
                    • 70-71; DISH Network Reply at 23; TIA Reply at 18-19. See, e.g., Ad Hoc Comments at 27; Google Comments at 88; Google-Verizon Joint Comments at 4-7; NJ Rate Counsel Comments at 11-12; PK et al. Comments at 71; Qwest Comments at 51; Microsoft Reply at 13. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.730. Furthermore, for good cause, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the Commission may shorten the deadlines or otherwise revise the procedures herein to expedite the adjudication of complaints. The rules adopted today explicitly authorize the Enforcement Bureau to resolve complaints alleging open Internet violations. See 47 U.S.C. �� 403, 503(b); 47 C.F.R. � 1.80. . See 5 U.S.C. � 603. See Open Internet NPRM, 24 FCC Rcd at 13136-52 (App.
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-201A1_Rcd.pdf
                    • at 70�71; DISH Network Reply at 23; TIA Reply at 18�19. 493See, e.g., Ad Hoc Comments at 27; Google Comments at 88; Google-Verizon Joint Comments at 4�7; NJ Rate Counsel Comments at 11�12; PK et al.Comments at 71; Qwest Comments at 51; Microsoft Reply at 13. 494See 47 C.F.R. � 1.730. Furthermore, for good cause, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the Commission may shorten the deadlines or otherwise revise the procedures herein to expedite the adjudication of complaints. 17988 Federal Communications Commission FCC 10-201 facilitate prompt decision-making, when possible we will resolve open Internet formal complaints at the bureau level, rather than the Commission level.495 C. FCC Initiated Actions 160. As noted above, in addition to ruling on complaints, the
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-25A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-25A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-25A1.txt
                    • #4 and US Cellular Wisconsin to withdraw their petitions because the Wisconsin Public Service Commission clarified that its state verification procedures apply to wireless ETCs. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4, 201-205, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154, 201-205, and 254, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that the Requests for Waiver filed by US Cellular Corporation, USOC of Washington RSA-4, Inc., Western Sub-RSA Ltd. Partnership, McDaniel Cellular Telephone Company, Oregon RSA No. 2 Limited Partnership, United States Cellular Operating Company of Richland, Yakima Washington MSA Limited Partnership, Alaska DigiTel, LLC, and Virginia Cellular, LLC d/b/a Cellular One on
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-27A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-27A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-27A1.txt
                    • addressed in this order. Accordingly, we remand the underlying funding year 2008 and 2009 FCC Form 471 applications to USAC for further action consistent with this order. ordering clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the underlying applications associated with the Requests for Waivers filed by the State of Louisiana Department of Education, the Recovery School District, and the New Orleans Public Schools filed on June 28, 2006, April 20, 2009, June 22, 2009, July 16, 2009, and August 4, 2009, respectively,
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-33A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-33A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-33A1.txt
                    • (202) 418-0530 or (202) 418-0432 (TTY). For further information, contact Regina Brown at (202) 418-7400 in the Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau. VI. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that sections 54.504(b)(2)(v) and 54.504(c)(1)(vii) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 54.504(b)(2)(v) and 54.504(c)(1)(vii) ARE WAIVED to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.102(b)(1), this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. IT IS FURTHER
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-47A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-47A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-47A1.txt
                    • the twelve month period ending December 31, 2000. * * * * * 10. Amend Section 36.154 by revising paragraph (g) to read as follows: � 36.154 Exchange Line Cable and Wire Facilities (C&WF) - Category 1 - apportionment procedures. * * * * * (g) Effective July 1, 2001, through June 30, 2011, all study areas shall apportion Subcategory 1.3 Exchange Line C&WF among the jurisdictions as specified in � 36.154(c). Direct assignment of subcategory Categories 1.1 and 1.2 Exchange Line C&WF to the jurisdictions shall be updated annually as specified in � 36.154(b). * * * * * 11. Amend Section 36.155 by revising paragraph (b) to read as follows: � 36.155 Wideband and exchange trunk (C&WF) - Category
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-81A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-81A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-81A1.txt
                    • 29.9 24.3 0.0 20.0 13.5 0.0 0.0 AT&T 17.0 21.2 0.0 33.7 10.1 0.0 0.0 Sprint Nextel 0.0 0.0 17.7 34.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 T-Mobile 0.0 0.0** 0.0 25.6 24.8 0.0 0.0 MetroPCS 0.4 0.0 0.0 3.4 5.3 0.0 0.0 US Cellular 1.9 2.2 0.0 2.3 1.8 0.0 0.0 Leap 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 7.9 0.0 0.0 Other 20.9 2.5 1.3 7.2 26.6 10.1 42.8 Clearwire 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 63.4 69.8 * Weighted average megahertz is the sum of the provider's MHz-POPs, divided by the U.S. population. ** T-Mobile holds a very small amount of Cellular spectrum. Mobile Wireless Provider Spectrum Holdings by Band Weighted by Population Analysis of Spectrum Holdings by Spectrum Characteristics In addition to considering the
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-81A1_Rcd.pdf
                    • 29.9 24.3 0.0 20.0 13.5 0.0 0.0 AT&T 17.0 21.2 0.0 33.7 10.1 0.0 0.0 Sprint Nextel 0.0 0.0 17.7 34.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 T-Mobile 0.0 0.0** 0.0 25.6 24.8 0.0 0.0 MetroPCS 0.4 0.0 0.0 3.4 5.3 0.0 0.0 US Cellular 1.9 2.2 0.0 2.3 1.8 0.0 0.0 Leap 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 7.9 0.0 0.0 Other 20.9 2.5 1.3 7.2 26.6 10.1 42.8 Clearwire 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 63.4 69.8 * Weighted average megahertz is the sum of the provider's MHz-POPs, divided by the U.S. population. ** T-Mobile holds a very small amount of Cellular spectrum. 11569 Federal Communications Commission FCC 10-81 Chart 40 Mobile Wireless Provider Spectrum Holdings by Band Weighted by Population 0 5 10 15
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-85A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-85A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-85A1.txt
                    • ``All Other Information Services,'' NAICS code 514199. The data cited in the text above are derived from the superseded category. See 5 U.S.C. � 603(c). See Porting Interval Order and Further Notice, 24 FCC Rcd at 6095, para. 19. Id. at 6089, para. 8. See id. at 6089, para. 8. See 47 U.S.C. �� 251(f)(2), 251(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See 5 U.S.C. � 801(a)(1)(A). See 5 U.S.C. � 604(b). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 10-85 Federal Communications Commission FCC 10-85 � � � � � kd[ kd� ��" ��" ��" ��" ��" ��" ��" ��" ��" ��" ��" ��" ��" ��" ��" ��" ��" ��" ��" ��" ��" ��" ��" ��" ��" ��" ��" ��" ��" ��" ��" ��"
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-89A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-89A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-89A1.txt
                    • the twelve month period ending December 31, 2000. * * * * * 10. Amend Section 36.154 by revising paragraph (g) to read as follows: � 36.154 Exchange Line Cable and Wire Facilities (C&WF) - Category 1 - apportionment procedures. * * * * * (g) Effective July 1, 2001, through June 30, 2011, all study areas shall apportion Subcategory 1.3 Exchange Line C&WF among the jurisdictions as specified in � 36.154(c). Direct assignment of subcategory Categories 1.1 and 1.2 Exchange Line C&WF to the jurisdictions shall be updated annually as specified in � 36.154(b). * * * * * 11. Amend Section 36.155 by revising paragraph (b) to read as follows: � 36.155 Wideband and exchange trunk (C&WF) - Category
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-91A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-91A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-91A1.txt
                    • will also continue to monitor carrier compliance with the hearing aid compatibility rules to ensure that deaf and hard-of-hearing Americans have access to the rapidly growing number of digital wireless handsets. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 1, 4(i), and 405 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 405 and Sections 1.3, 1.429, 1.925, and 20.19 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.429, 1.925, 20.19, that this Order on Reconsideration IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 1, 4(i), and 405 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 405 and Sections 1.3, 1.429, 1.925, and 20.19 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-91A1_Rcd.pdf
                    • 2006.19The Commission ruled that CC hadfailed to make the requisite showing justifying a waiver of 12See47 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(3). See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969), appeal after remand, 459F.2d 1203 (D.C. Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972); Northeast Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990); 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. 13See WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1158 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972); see also Family Stations, Inc. v. DirecTV, Inc., Order on Reconsideration,19 FCC Rcd 14777, 14780 (MB 2004). 14Rio Grande Family Radio Fellowship, Inc. v. FCC, 406 F.2d 664 (D.C. Cir. 1968). 15CC November 17, 2005 Report at 2. 16Id. 17CC April 25,
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-92A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-92A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-92A1.txt
                    • workshops, there was general support among the broadcasters and other representatives for bright line structural ownership rules with some flexibility built in for exceptional circumstances where a waiver would be appropriate. See, e.g., NAB Comments at 6-7. See supra nn. 40, 47, 50, 59, and 121. Generally, the Commission's rules may be waived for good cause shown. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. Northeast Celllular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). In addition, the Commission may take into account considerations of hardship, equity, or more effective implementation of overall policy on an individual basis. WAIT Radio
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-102A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-102A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-102A1.txt
                    • for redefinition filed by Standing Rock on February 18, 2010 IS DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Standing Rock Telecommunications, Inc. SHALL SUBMIT additional information pursuant to section 54.209 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.209, no later than October 1, 2011, as part of its annual reporting requirements. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, sections 54.307, 54.313, 54.314, and 54.316 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 54.307, 54.313, 54.314, 54.316, ARE WAIVED to the extent discussed herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Order SHALL BE TRANSMITTED by the Wireline Competition Bureau to the North Dakota Public Service Commission, the South Dakota
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-103A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-103A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-103A1.txt
                    • 16.2 21.3 0.0 32.5 6.8 0.0 0.0 Sprint Nextel 0.0 0.0 17.7 33.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 Clearwire 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 63.4 69.8 T-Mobile 0.0 0.0** 0.0 24.3 23.4 0.0 0.0 MetroPCS 0.3 0.0 0.0 3.2 7.9 0.0 0.0 US Cellular 1.8 2.1 0.0 2.3 1.8 0.0 0.0 Leap 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.8 7.4 0.0 0.0 Other 19.5 2.1 1.3 7.2 25.5 10.1 42.8 * Weighted average megahertz is the sum of the provider's MHz-POPs, divided by the U.S. population. ** SunCom Wireless License Company, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of T-Mobile, holds one Cellular license. Mobile Wireless Provider Spectrum Holdings by Band, Weighted by Population Analysis of Spectrum Holdings by Spectrum Characteristics In addition to considering the quantity of
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-103A1_Rcd.pdf
                    • Less Competitive? The Case of 800-Number Portability," RAND Journal of Economics. His results showthat competition intensified (via a price reduction of around 14 percent per customer) after the implementation of 800-number portability. The average number of wireless subscribers per month porting their phone number from one service provider to another has been steadily increasing over time to an average of 1.3 million per month for the first nine months of 2009, up from 0.9 million per month in 2005, the first full year after (continued....) 9809 Federal Communications Commission FCC 11-103 loyalty, although extremely difficult to quantify, are also important. 1. Access to Information on Mobile Wireless Services 241. In order to make informed decisions, consumers need detailed information about the
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-110A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-110A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-110A1.txt
                    • Licensing Freezes,'' Public Notice, RM 11626, DA 11-562, released March 28, 2011. Applicants filing displacement applications should take this into account when seeking an in-core channel to specify in their displacement application. While applicants unable to meet the September 1, 2011 deadline for submission of an in-core channel digital displacement application may, of course, seek a waiver pursuant to Section 1.3 of the rules, see 47 C.F.R. 1.3, applicants will be expected to comply with the December 31, 2011 deadline for all LPTV stations to cease operations in the 700 MHz bands. Further Notice, 24 FCC Rcd at 13841. Stations should be mindful of Section 312(g) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. � 312(g), which provides that: ``If a broadcasting station
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-118A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-118A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-118A1.txt
                    • 8. See ASL Comments at 9; Consumer Groups Comments at 4; Snap Comments at 7; contra, CSDVRS Comments at 5. See Consumer Groups Comments at 4. See Sorenson Comments at 9; see also Purple Reply Comments at 6. See ASL Comments at 9. Under those circumstances, we will entertain a request for waiver for good cause shown pursuant to section 1.3 of our rules. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See Sorenson Comments at 8-9. See Snap Comments at 6. See 47 C.F.R. � 67.604(b)(4)(i). This includes iTRS providers that are presently eligible because they are operating relay facilities under contract with a certified state TRS program, own or operate relay facilities under contract with a common carrier providing interstate services, or are
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-123A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-123A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-123A1.txt
                    • in a report to be sent to Congress and the Government Accountability Office pursuant to the Congressional Review Act. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 225, 251(e), and 255 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 154(j), 225, 251(e), and 255, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, this Report and Order IS ADOPTED, and that Part 64 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. Part 64, IS AMENDED as set forth in Appendix A. The Report and Order shall become effective 30 days after publication in the Federal Register, except for the information collections, which require approval by OMB under
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-138A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-138A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-138A1.txt
                    • special considerations for these devices? If the Commission considers waivers for a particular ``class'' of apparatus, what factors should we consider, and how should we determine what apparatus constitute a ``class''? Should the Commission adopt a process for determining whether to waive the closed captioning requirements of Section 203 of the CVAA, or should we handle waivers pursuant to Section 1.3 of our rules? We also seek comment on whether apparatus also includes software. To what extent is hardware that is designed to receive or play back video programming dependent on software for its functionality? For example, consumers view programming intended to be covered by Section 202 on personal computers and cellular telephones. Both a computer and a cellular phone can
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-150A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-150A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-150A1.txt
                    • among other things, any provider of advanced communications services (including non-interconnected VoIP service), or any class of such services that is ``designed for multiple purposes, but is designed primarily for purposes other than using advanced communications services.'' 47 U.S.C. � 617(h)(1). 47 U.S.C. � 616. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h) ; 47 C.F.R. �� 64.604(c)(5)(iii)(A) and (B) 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. In general, waivers must articulate an ``appropriate general standard,'' show special circumstances warranting a deviation from the general rule, and show such a deviation will serve the public interest. See Northeast Cellular Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990), citing WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969). To the extent that such providers
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-151A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-151A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-151A1.txt
                    • specific act or thing complained of, together with such facts as are necessary to give a full understanding of the matter, including relevant legal and documentary support). Wherefore, complainant asks (here state specifically the relief desired). (Date) (Name of each complainant) (Name, address, and telephone number of attorney, if any) (c) The complainant may petition the staff, pursuant to � 1.3, for a waiver of any of the requirements of this section. Such waiver may be granted for good cause shown. (d) Supplemental complaints. (1) Supplemental complaints filed pursuant to � 14.39 shall conform to the requirements set out in this section and � 14.38 of this subpart, except that the requirements in �� 14.38(b), 14.39 (a)(4), (a)(5), (a)(8), (a)(9), (a)(12),
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-159A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-159A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-159A1.txt
                    • exemption because petitioner had failed to provide documentary support or affidavit for its claim that it was unable to provide captions because it received less then $3 million per year in donations, and that it had received quotes of $300 per half hour of captioning). Generally, the Commission's rules may be waived only for good cause shown. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular); see also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969). None of the Bureau Letter Orders analyzed the individual circumstances
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.txt
                    • specific method of compliance. Carriers will have flexibility to devise their own means to pass this information in their MF signaling. Nevertheless, to the extent that a party is unable to comply with our rule as a result of technical limitations related to MF signaling in its network, it can seek a waiver for good cause shown, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules. IP Signaling. Consistent with the proposal in the USF/ICC Transformation NPRM, the rules we adopt today also apply to interconnected VoIP traffic. Failure to include interconnected VoIP traffic in our signaling rules would create a large and growing loophole as the number of interconnected VoIP lines in service continues to grow. Many commenters supported application of
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-175A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-175A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-175A1.txt
                    • good cause is demonstrated.) Tj 1 0 0 1 387.35 207.149 Tm 85 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (See) Tj 1 0 0 1 403.65 207.149 Tm 89 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (47 C.F.R.) Tj 1 0 0 1 445.65 205.5 Tm 65 Tz /OPBaseFont0 11 Tf (�) Tj 1 0 0 1 453.8 207.149 Tm 79 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (1.3;) Tj 1 0 0 1 471.6 207.149 Tm 86 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (WAITRadio v.) Tj 1 0 0 1 67.65 195.6 Tm 91 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 \(D.C. Cir. 1969\). An applicant for waiver faces a "high hurdle," and must plead the facts) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.4 184.35 Tm 90 Tz (and
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-177A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-177A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-177A1.txt
                    • Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (Petition for Reconsideration at 14-15.) Tj 1 0 0 1 76.049 186.75 Tm (56 Generally, the Commission's rules may be waived for good cause shown. 47 C.F.R.) Tj 1 0 0 1 424.8 184.799 Tm 72 Tz /OPBaseFont0 10 Tf (�) Tj 1 0 0 1 432.95 186.25 Tm 87 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (1.3.) Tj 1 0 0 1 451.9 186.25 Tm 98 Tz (The Commission may) Tj 1 0 0 1 76.049 174.75 Tm (exercise its discretion to waive a rule where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public) Tj 1 0 0 1 76.299 163.199 Tm 95 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (interest.) Tj 1 0 0 1 112.55 163
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-182A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-182A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-182A1.txt
                    • obtaining the equipment to comply with the regulation adopted pursuant to subsection (a) would result in financial hardship, the Federal Communications Commission may grant a waiver of the effective date set forth in paragraph (1) for 1 year and may renew such waiver for 1 additional year.[] (3) Waiver Authority. Nothing in this section affects the Commission's authority under section 1.3 of its rules (47 C.F.R. 1.3) to waive any rule required by this Act, or the application of any such rule, for good cause shown to a television broadcast station, cable operator, or other multichannel video programming distributor, or to a class of such stations, operators, or distributors.[] (c) Compliance. Any broadcast television operator, cable operator, or other multichannel video
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-183A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-183A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-183A1.txt
                    • companies by revenue. These four firms accounted for approximately 50 percent of FSS global industry revenues in 2007, and 42 percent in 2010. TABLE III.4 TOP FOUR FSS OPERATORS, GLOBAL REVENUES, 2007-2010 Firm Name Satellites in Fleet Total Revenue (billions US$) 2007 2008 2009 2010 Intelsat 52 2.2 2.4 2.5 2.5 SES 34 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.3 Eutelsat 24 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.6 Telesat 12 0.7 0.6 0.8 0.8 Total 4-Firm Revenues 6.5 6.6 6.8 7.2 Total Industry Revenues 13.0 14.5 16.4 17.1 4-Firm Share 50% 46% 42% 42% Worldwide, the fixed satellite industry has significant unused capacity. The annual levels of worldwide unused capacity for the years from 2003-2010 are given in Figure III.1. FIGURE III.1 Capacity varies by region.
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-183A1_Rcd.pdf
                    • companies by revenue. These four firms accounted for approximately 50 percent of FSS global industry revenues in 2007,60 and 42 percent in 2010. TABLE III.4 TOP FOUR FSS OPERATORS, GLOBAL REVENUES, 2007-201061 Firm Name Satellites in Fleet Total Revenue (billions US$) 2007 2008 2009 2010 Intelsat 52 2.2 2.4 2.5 2.5 SES 34 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.3 Eutelsat 24 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.6 Telesat 12 0.7 0.6 0.8 0.8 Total 4-Firm Revenues62 6.5 6.6 6.8 7.2 Total Industry Revenues63 13.0 14.5 16.4 17.1 4-Firm Share 50% 46% 42% 42% 60 Data from Space News, List of Top Fixed Satellite Operator (June 30, 2008). 61 Data from company reports and 10-K filings, then converted to US dollars using the average annual exchange
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-185A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-185A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-185A1.txt
                    • should place limitations on radiolocation equipment in general or FOD detection equipment in particular, the costs of doing or not doing so, and the benefits of either course of action. order Trex requests a waiver of Section 90.103 to permit certification, manufacture, licensing, and use of its FOD detection radar equipment pending the resolution of its petition for rulemaking. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules provides that we may grant a waiver if good cause therefor is shown. We conclude that we should grant a waiver to permit the certification, manufacture, and licensed use of the Trex equipment pursuant to Part 90, pending the resolution of this proceeding, under certain conditions. We find granting this waiver to be in the public
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-185A1_Rcd.pdf
                    • should place limitations on radiolocation equipment in general or FOD detection equipment in particular, the costs of doing or not doing so, and the benefits of either course of action. III. ORDER 15.Trex requests a waiver of Section 90.103 to permit certification, manufacture, licensing, and use of its FOD detection radar equipment pending the resolution of its petition for rulemaking.29Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules provides that we may grant a waiver if good cause therefor is shown.30 We conclude that we should grant a waiver to permit the certification, manufacture, and licensed use of the Trex equipment pursuant to Part 90, pending the resolution of this proceeding, under certain conditions. We find granting this waiver to be in the public
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-186A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-186A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-186A1.txt
                    • whether it may be appropriate to adopt specific factors to consider in instance in which an applicant is seeking a waiver of the restriction on combinations involving a top-four television station or the eight voice test. Finally, we seek comment on whether and why such provisions are needed given that filing a waiver petition is always an option under section 1.3 of the Commission's rules? Minority and Female Ownership. According to DCS, there are still significant barriers to entry by minority owners in both the traditional and new media industries; DCS supports measures to facilitate minority media ownership. DCS states that minority-owned stations are more likely to provide programming geared towards minority audiences and that minority communities are underserved as a
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-188A1_Rcd.pdf
                    • apply only to new device offerings by AT&T, "beginning as early as 6 months after the transaction closes and fully implemented two years following the close of the transaction."187Vulcan also states that to preserve future interoperability and protect Lower A Block licenses from potential interference, the Commission 184See 47 C.F.R. � 1.730.Furthermore, for good cause, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the Commission may shorten the deadlines or otherwise revise the procedures herein to expedite the adjudication of complaints. 185SeeCellular South Petition to Deny at 5-6, 19; RTG Petition to Deny at 19; RTG Reply Comments at 7; RCA Petition to Deny at 12; King Street Petition to Condition Grant at 5; Free Press Petition to Condition Grant at 5; Letter
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-189A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-189A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-189A1.txt
                    • be the same. See USF/ICC Transformation Order App. A at 509 (amending � 51.709(c)). We emphasize that, by providing for a default bill-and-keep methodology to apply on July 1, 2012 rather than on December 29, 2011, we do not extend the terms of existing contracts until July 1, 2012 that would otherwise expire before that time. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (citing WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (petitioners for waiver must show special circumstances warranting a deviation from the general rule, and show such deviation will serve the public interest)). See Letter from Norina T. Moy, Director, Government Affairs, Sprint,
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-2A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-2A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-2A1.txt
                    • the Third Report and Order prohibiting the certification, manufacture, importation, sale or use of 121.5 MHz ELTs. No action will be taken regarding 121.5 MHz ELTs until further notice, following an additional opportunity for interested parties to comment. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that the effectiveness of the amendment of Section 87.195 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 87.195, adopted in the Third Report and Order in WT Docket 01-289, IS STAYED pending further Commission action, as described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary See Review of Part 87 of the Commission's
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-2A1_Rcd.pdf
                    • Letter at 1; see also AOPA Letter at 1-2. 686 Federal Communications Commission FCC 11-2 of 121.5 MHz ELTs.16No action will be taken regarding 121.5 MHz ELTs until further notice, following an additional opportunity for interested parties to comment.17 6. Accordingly,ITIS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that the effectiveness of the amendment of Section 87.195 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 87.195, adopted in the Third Report and Orderin WT Docket 01-289, IS STAYED pending further Commission action, as described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary 16In determining whether to stay the effectiveness of one
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-34A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-34A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-34A1.txt
                    • the twelve month period ending December 31, 2000. * * * * * 10. Amend Section 36.154 by revising paragraph (g) to read as follows: � 36.154 Exchange Line Cable and Wire Facilities (C&WF) - Category 1 - apportionment procedures. * * * * * (g) Effective July 1, 2001, through June 30, 2012, all study areas shall apportion Subcategory 1.3 Exchange Line C&WF among the jurisdictions as specified in � 36.154(c). Direct assignment of subcategory Categories 1.1 and 1.2 Exchange Line C&WF to the jurisdictions shall be updated annually as specified in � 36.154(b). * * * * * 11. Amend Section 36.155 by revising paragraph (b) to read as follows: � 36.155 Wideband and exchange trunk (C&WF) - Category
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-37A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-37A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-37A1.txt
                    • comment on the process that we should adopt for determining whether to waive the requirements of Section 716 and specifically on the extent to which we need to adopt any procedures to ensure that such process is efficient and effective. Alternatively, we seek comment on whether we should handle waivers as we have in the normal course pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules. We agree with commenters who state that we should ``incorporate protections for confidential information'' and propose that parties seeking waivers be able to request confidential treatment of information pursuant to Section 0.459 of the Commission's rules. At the same time, we agree with AAPD that, to the extent possible, the process should be ``transparent and public,''
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-39A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-39A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-39A1.txt
                    • the integrity of the program and will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under our procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the requests for review by Chicago Public Schools, Coosa County School District, Gallup-McKinley County Public Schools, Holyoke School District, KIPP Academy, and Whitley County School System ARE GRANTED and the underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order.
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-52A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-52A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-52A1.txt
                    • these costs as variable costs yields a variable cost to revenue ratio of 19,944/62,131 = ~ 0.32.) The record does not address the elasticity of demand for wireless broadband services, but the academic literature provides estimates of elasticities for wireless voice minutes of use and wired broadband usage. For wireless voice minutes of use, these estimates range between -0.1 and -1.3. (See, e.g., Allan T. Ingraham, Sidak, J. Gregory, ``Do States Tax Wireless Services Inefficiently - Evidence on the Price Elasticity of Demand,'' 24 Va. Tax Rev. 249, Fall, 2004; Christian Growitsch, J. Scott Marcus, and Christian Wernick, ``The effects of lower Mobile Termination Rates (MTRs) on retail price and demand,'' Communications & Strategies Article, October 1, 2010; Youngsoo Kim, Rahul
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-54A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-54A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-54A1.txt
                    • is initiated. See, e.g. United States v. Kim E. Hawkins et al., Criminal No. 09-857, D.N.J. (Nov. 18, 2009); United States v. Verson et al., Criminal No. 859, D.N.J. (Nov. 18, 2009); See e.g., Transcript of Testimony at 281-285, United States v. Pena, D.N.J. (2010)(No. 09-858). Generally, the Commission's rules may be waived for good cause shown. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular); see also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969). Waiver of the Commission's rules is appropriate only if special
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-71A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-71A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-71A1.txt
                    • the twelve month period ending December 31, 2000. * * * * * 10. Amend Section 36.154 by revising paragraph (g) to read as follows: � 36.154 Exchange Line Cable and Wire Facilities (C&WF) - Category 1 - apportionment procedures. * * * * * (g) Effective July 1, 2001, through June 30, 2012, all study areas shall apportion Subcategory 1.3 Exchange Line C&WF among the jurisdictions as specified in � 36.154(c). Direct assignment of subcategory Categories 1.1 and 1.2 Exchange Line C&WF to the jurisdictions shall be updated annually as specified in � 36.154(b). * * * * * 11. Amend Section 36.155 by revising paragraph (b) to read as follows: � 36.155 Wideband and exchange trunk (C&WF) - Category
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-72A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-72A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-72A1.txt
                    • The staff practice has been to waive relatively minor filing deadline violations, so long as the applicant can demonstrate that construction was, in fact, completed in a timely manner. BCI argues, however, that the staff's sua sponte waiver of the automatic expiration provision of Section 73.3598(e) of the Rules changes a Commission rule without notice and comment. We disagree. Section 1.3 of the Rules expressly provides that ``any provision of the [R]ules may be waived by the Commission on its own motion . . . ,'' in whole or in part, for good cause shown; such waivers also are well within the staff's delegated authority established in Section 0.283 of the Rules. The staff has exercised its waiver authority in many
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-79A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-79A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-79A1.txt
                    • Section 15.253(b). See Era comments in ET Docket 10-28. See ``Electromagnetic compatibility and Radio spectrum Matters (ERM); Short Range Devices; Road Transport and Traffic Telematics (RTTT); Radar equipment operating in the 76 GHz to 77 GHz range; Part 1: Technical characteristics and test methods for radar equipment operating in the 76 GHz to 77 GHz range'', EN 301 091 Ver. 1.3.3 See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1307(b), 2.1091 and 2.1093. See generally 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. See 5 U.S.C. � 603. -612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, (SBREFA) Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). 5 U.S.C. � 604(a)(3). 5 U.S.C. � 601(6). 5 U.S.C. � 601(3) (incorporating by
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-84A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-84A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-84A1.txt
                    • obtaining the equipment to comply with the regulation adopted pursuant to subsection (a) would result in financial hardship, the Federal Communications Commission may grant a waiver of the effective date set forth in paragraph (1) for 1 year and may renew such waiver for 1 additional year. (3) Waiver Authority. Nothing in this section affects the Commission's authority under section 1.3 of its rules (47 C.F.R. 1.3) to waive any rule required by this Act, or the application of any such rule, for good cause shown to a television broadcast station, cable operator, or other multichannel video programming distributor, or to a class of such stations, operators, or distributors. (c) Compliance. Any broadcast television operator, cable operator, or other multichannel video
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-92A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-92A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-92A1.txt
                    • OMB approval does not occur until later than 120 days after this order is published in the Federal Register, the effective date will be the date of OMB approval. See 47 C.F.R. � 61.87. We note that the Commission has discretion to waive its rules on its own motion at any time ``for good cause shown.'' See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a regulation where the particular facts make strict compliance unnecessary or inconsistent with the public interest. See Northeast Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). Here, we find that waiver of section 61.87 is warranted in order to streamline the initial electronic filing of Base Documents. We
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-27A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-27A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-27A1.txt
                    • the twelve month period ending December 31, 2000. * * * * * 10. Amend Section 36.154 by revising paragraph (g) to read as follows: � 36.154 Exchange Line Cable and Wire Facilities (C&WF) - Category 1 - apportionment procedures. * * * * * (g) Effective July 1, 2001, through June 30, 2014, all study areas shall apportion Subcategory 1.3 Exchange Line C&WF among the jurisdictions as specified in � 36.154(c). Direct assignment of subcategory Categories 1.1 and 1.2 Exchange Line C&WF to the jurisdictions shall be updated annually as specified in � 36.154(b). * * * * * 11. Amend Section 36.155 by revising paragraph (b) to read as follows: � 36.155 Wideband and exchange trunk (C&WF) - Category
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-28A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-28A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-28A1.txt
                    • the LPFM stations at risk of displacement, the Bureau had identified alternate channels that would require waivers of the second-adjacent channel spacing requirements. To avoid ``potential harm to this small but not insignificant number of LPFM stations,'' the Commission adopted the waiver processing policy. In adopting this policy, the Commission relied on the general waiver provisions set forth in Section 1.3 of the rules. Section 3(b)(2)(A) of the LCRA explicitly grants the Commission the authority to waive the second-adjacent channel spacing requirements. Section 3(b)(2)(A) permits waivers where an LPFM station establishes, ``using methods of predicting interference taking into account all relevant factors, including terrain-sensitive propagation models,'' that its proposed operations ``will not result in interference to any authorized radio service.'' We
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-44A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-44A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-44A1.txt
                    • of federal political advertising dollars spent on broadcast television, respectively. Id. In our review of the political files of the Baltimore DMA, the political files of the stations that will be exempt averaged 247 pages, which is substantially smaller than the political files for the stations affiliated with the top four networks, which averaged 2104 pages. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. NAB Supplemental Comments at 1, citing the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, P.L. 107-155, 116 Stat. 81 (2002). See also Ex Parte Presentation of Target Enterprises at 13-15 (filed April 19, 2012). Id. at 1-2. Id. at 3-4; citing Gozlon-Peretz v. U.S., 498 U.S. 395, 404 (1991). See 47 U.S.C. � 315(e)(1). See 47 U.S.C. � 315(e)(3). See 47
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-46A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-46A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-46A1.txt
                    • Methodology Order and FNPRM, 17 FCC Rcd at 3806, para. 125. Although we anticipate that the contribution factor will be less likely to increase above that year's LIRE-qualifying factor if we use a formula rather than a fixed percentage, the Commission's waiver rules would remain in effect even with revision of the LIRE, as discussed herein. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. 47 U.S.C. � 254(d). 47 C.F.R. � 54.708. Id. The 55 percent includes 1,920 filers that reported no revenue. This information was calculated based on a review of the Telecommunications Reporting Worksheets filed in April 2011. De minimis telecommunications providers may indirectly contribute to the universal service support mechanisms through contribution pass through charges that they pay to their wholesale
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-49A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-49A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-49A1.txt
                    • the twelve month period ending December 31, 2000. * * * * * 10. Amend Section 36.154 by revising paragraph (g) to read as follows: � 36.154 Exchange Line Cable and Wire Facilities (C&WF) - Category 1 - apportionment procedures. * * * * * (g) Effective July 1, 2001, through June 30, 2014, all study areas shall apportion Subcategory 1.3 Exchange Line C&WF among the jurisdictions as specified in � 36.154(c). Direct assignment of subcategory Categories 1.1 and 1.2 Exchange Line C&WF to the jurisdictions shall be updated annually as specified in � 36.154(b). * * * * * 11. Amend Section 36.155 by revising paragraph (b) to read as follows: � 36.155 Wideband and exchange trunk (C&WF) - Category
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-50A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-50A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-50A1.txt
                    • continue its efforts in this regard notwithstanding our stay. See Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Ass'n, 259 F.2d at 925 (``In litigation involving the administration of regulatory statutes designed to promote the public interest, [the public interest] factor necessarily becomes crucial. The interests of private litigants must give way to the realization of public purposes.''). 47 C.F.R. � 76.1302(j)(1); see id. � 1.3 (Commission may waive any rule on its own motion for good cause). In granting a stay on our own motion for the reasons stated, we need not consider Comcast's arguments in favor of a stay. See AT&T Services, Inc. & S. New England Tel. Co. d/b/a AT&T Connecticut, 26 FCC Rcd 14293, 14293 & n.7 (MB 2011) (``In taking this
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-52A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-52A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-52A1.txt
                    • in section 405 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 405, and section 1.429 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.429, the Petition for Reconsideration of General Communication, Inc., is GRANTED to the extent provided herein and DENIED to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the Petition for Waiver of Crocket Telephone Company Inc., Peoples Telephone Company, and West Tennessee Telephone Company, Inc., is DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the Petition for Waiver of Shoreham Telephone Company is DISMISSED. IT
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-7A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-7A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-7A1.txt
                    • Houston Christian Broadcasters, Inc., The Moody Bible Institute of Chicago, Augusta Radio Fellowship Institute, Inc., Big River Public Broadcasting Corporation, Life on The Way Communications, Inc., and The Sister Sherry Lynn Foundation Inc., Comments, EB Docket 04-296 (filed July 20, 2011) at 4. The Commission may, on its own motion, waive its rules for good cause shown. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See, also Northeast Cellular Telephone Co., L.P. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (``FCC has authority to waive its rules if there is ``good cause'' to do so.''). The Commission may also exercise its discretion to waive a rule where particular facts would make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest, and grant of a waiver would
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-9A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-9A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-9A1.txt
                    • contains no justification for shortening the response time or denying extensions, and more time rather than less may be needed in light of the complicated chain of entities that could be involved in determining why any particular program might appear online without captions.''). See NPRM, 26 FCC Rcd at 13757, 13771, � 45 and App. A. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.46; see also 47 U.S.C. � 154(j) (``The Commission may conduct its proceedings in such manner as will best conduce to the proper dispatch of business and to the ends of justice.''). Motions for extension of time, however, are not routinely granted, 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a), and waivers are granted only for good cause, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See, e.g.,
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-96-325A1.pdf
                    • Commission comments at 2-3; Ohio Commission comments at 4-5; accord NYNEX reply at 4. 76 Ohio Commission comments at 4-5; accord NARUC comments at 6-7. 77 Ohio Commission comments at 4-5. 78 47 U.S.C. � 252(a) (parties may negotiate and enter into a binding agreement without regard to standards set forth 79 in sections 251(b) and (c)). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. 80 35 showing of need. The Ohio and Florida Commissions recommend that the FCC adopt explicit 75 requirements that states could choose to adopt, but that states would have the option of developing their own requirements. Under the proposal recommended by the Ohio Commission, existing state 76 regulations that are consistent with the 1996 Act would be "grandfathered." In addition,
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-96-349A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-96-349A1.txt
                    • Trans-Oceanic Facilities- Based Telecommunications Services (June 24,1994). 17 Comsat adds that it is also subject to additional rules not applicable to other carriers. Those rules affect its corporate structure, its issuance of debt and equity, information flow among its affiliates, and its participation in INTELSAT. Comsat Petition at n.9. 18 International Competitive Carrier, 102 F.C.C.2d at 839. " See Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. * WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1158 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert, denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972). 21 Northeast Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). 9625 justified.22 Contrary to some commenters' claims, we do not need to conduct a rulemaking to waive a portion of
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-97-145A1.pdf
                    • ATU has shown that there is a likelihood that its revenues will soon decrease once again to a level below the reporting and filing threshold. Under these unique circumstances, we find that there is good cause shown to waive ATU's compliance with our reporting requirements. The public interest will not be served by requiring ATU to incur 165 See section 1.3 of the Commissions rules, 47 C.F.R.�1.3. 166 Northeast Cellular Tel, Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). 167 WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d1153, 1157(D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972). 168 WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d at1158. 169 See Northeast Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d at 1166, jjjg WAIT Radio v.
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-98-296A1.pdf
                    • INMARSAT geostationary satellite in which continuous alerting is available (the area between 70o North Latitude and 70o South Latitude, which is within the footprint of the INMARSAT system); Sea Area A4 � an area outside Sea Areas A1, A2, and A3 (essentially the polar regions). See 47 C.F.R. � 80.1069. Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-296 4 III. DISCUSSION 5. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules17 provides that any rule may be waived or suspended by the Commission on its own motion. A waiver or suspension of a given rule pursuant to Section 1.3 is appropriate when "special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule and such deviation will serve the public interest."18 We find such circumstances present here. Permitting small
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-206A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-206A1.txt
                    • Rcd at 21487. 32 Id. 33 Id. at 21488. 34 See 47 C.F.R. Part 69; see also MTS and WATS Market Structure, CC Docket No. 78-72, Phase I, Third Report and Order, 93 FCC 2d 241 (1983) (Access Charge Order). The Commission has not prescribed a special access rate structure. Access Charge Order, 93 FCC 2d at 314-15. 35 Section 1.3 permits the Commission to grant waivers of any of its rules if "good cause therefor is shown." 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. 36 See Northeast Cellular Telephone Company v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular); WAIT Radio v. FCC (WAIT Radio), 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969) ("Good cause" is interpreted to require petitioners to show that
                  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-313A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-313A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-313A1.txt
                    • Government Security Committee ("GSC"), as hereinafter provided. The GSC shall be established no later than 30 days after the last of its members has received the appropriate security clearance. Until that time, oversight of the Company's protection of Classified, Controlled Unclassified, and Sensitive Information shall be the responsibility of the Company's designated representative identified in Section 7.3 of this Agreement. 1.3 Departure and Replacement of Principal Managers 1.3.1 The Company shall provide written notification to the DSS and the FBISC in advance, to the extent feasible, of the departure of a Principal Manager of the Company, and of any replacement for the departed Principal Manager. Any replacement for any departed Principal Manager shall meet the qualifications set forth in this Agreement.
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1999/fcc99024.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1999/fcc99024.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1999/fcc99024.wp
                    • customers obtain a higher(c)quality connection at speeds up to 128 kbps using Integrated �Services Digital Network ("ISDN") services sold by LECs. ISDN services can be used to connect with �AT&T is the largest provider of residential Internet access service that does not bundle � (press release), Jan. 22, 1999. AT&T's WorldNet dial(c)up service is the �number two online service, with 1.3 million residential customers as compared with America Online's 15 million �total customers. AT&T is considering selling WorldNet to @Home Corp. in exchange for $1 billion in @Home � �TCI does not provide dial(c)up Internet access service. MCI(c)WorldCom is the leading provider of the ԍThe facilities used by dial(c)up Internet access providers include the servers and connections to local exchange �and
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/fcc00202.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/fcc00202.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/fcc00202.txt
                    • 9 (1995) (entity to purchase discount airline tickets on behalf of a group of corporations); IFA Shippers' Ass'n, 1990 DOJBRL LEXIS 2 (1990) (shippers form group to purchase volume discounts from ocean carriers); Utilities Service Alliance, 1996 DOJBRL LEXIS 4 (1996) (electric power utilities form alliance to purchase resources). Applicants Dec. 21 Ownership Reply Comments at 35. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co., LP v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1165 (D.C. Cir. 1990); United States v. Storer Broadcasting Co., 351 U.S. 192, 205 (1956). WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972). Attribution Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 19029-19031 �� 33-37 (rejecting commenters' ``day-to-day control'' arguments). See Letter from Mark
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc98335.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc98335.txt
                    • and Subscriber Size of Major Cable System Clusters (Cumulative Figures) Range of Clustered Subscribers (thousands) 1994 1995 1996 1997 Clusters Subs. (millions) Clusters Subs. (millions) Clusters Subs. (millions) Clusters Subs. (millions) 100-199 58 8.0 76 10.4 76 10.3 49 6.7 200-299 26 6.0 35 8.4 34 8.3 33 8.2 300-399 6 2.0 8 2.8 11 3.7 11 3.8 400-499 3 1.3 10 4.5 8 3.6 8 3.7 > 500 4 2.8 8 5.1 10 7.7 16 11.9 Total 97 20.1 137 31.2 139 33.6 117 34.3 Sources: Paul Kagan Associates, Inc., Major Cable TV Systems/Clusters, The Cable TV Financial Databook, 1995, at 38-39; 1996, at 38-40; 1997, at 39-41; 1998, at 38-42. Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-335 1MSO subscriber totals as
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98118.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98118.wp
                    • a thorough history of the Computer III proceeding, see Computer III Further Notice, supra, n.14, �� 9-16. Given the on-going Computer III Further Remand proceedings, as noted above, we direct parties to raise general comments about the Commission's regulatory framework for BOC provision of information services in that docket. 24 47 C.F.R. � 5.01 et seq. 25 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (authorizing the Commission to issue waivers "for good cause shown"). 6 technology and on whether affirmative steps are necessary to further encourage and facilitate testing by removing regulatory barriers to such testing. We believe that the Commission's regulatory processes should not unduly impede experiments in new technology, and we ask commenters in this proceeding to discuss fully how current Commission
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99122.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99122.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99122.wp
                    • code sharing between service providers. NANC Report at � 1.10. 177 NANC Report at �� 1.5.1 and 1.10.2; ALTS comments at 7; GTE comments at 8-9; PrimeCo comments at 3-4; Sprint comments at summary iv. 178 NANC Report at �� 1.1 and 1.10; NASUCA comments at 4; RCN comments at 2; Vanguard comments at 2. 179 NANC Report at � 1.3. See also ALTS comments at 7; MediaOne comments at 5; U S West comments at 27. Because rate centers are regulated by states, rate center consolidation requires state regulatory approval. NANC Report at � 1.10.1. 180 SBC comments at 29. 49 113.Rate center consolidation is the combining or aggregating of several existing rate centers into fewer rate centers.175 Rate center
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99204.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99204.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99204.wp
                    • carriers must provide, the Commission has established a uniform, nationwide standard for the services to which all Americans should have access. Individual carriers, however, may obtain a waiver of the Commission's rules if good cause is shown therefor.446 6. Federal Rules that May Duplicate, Overlap, or Conflict With the Notice 222. None. 445 See para. 95. 446 See 47 C.F.R. �1.3 Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-204 97 SEPARATE STATEMENT OF COMMISSIONER HAROLD FURCHTGOTT-ROTH DISSENTING IN PART Re: Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service: Promoting Deployment and Subscribership in Unserved and Underserved Areas, Including Tribal and Insular Areas, CC Docket 96-45. I support many of the worthwhile goals of today's Order. Although I write separately to express limited concerns about this item,
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/da971728.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/da971728.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/da971728.wp
                    • ATU regarding 11(b)). On or before November 15, 1997, PRTC and ATU must submit complete responses to question 2. V. ORDERING CLAUSES 17. Accordingly, pursuant to Sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202, 218-220, 254, and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, 218-220, 254, and 403, and Sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, IT IS ORDERED that the United States Telephone Association's Request for Extension of Time to File Data, on behalf of the RHCs, GTE, and Sprint, IS GRANTED to the extent described herein and otherwise IS DENIED. 18. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202, 218-220,
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97387.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97387.wp
                    • AND DISCUSSION 12. Beehive raises several arguments in support of its position that the decision to modify the ex parte procedures applicable to its complaint violated the Commission's own rules, and thereby tainted that proceeding. We will address these arguments seriatim. Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-387 _____________________________________________________________________________ Application at 5-10. 38 Id. 39 Id. at 8. 40 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. 41 Omnipoint Corp. v. FCC, 78 F.3d 620, 631 (D.C. Cir. 1996) (upholding Commission's authority to 42 waive rules providing parties right to file reply comments in rulemaking proceeding). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200(a). 43 See, e.g., East River Electric Cooperative, DA 97-205 (Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, 44 released Jan. 28, 1997); Application of Comsat Corp., DA 96-1972 (International Bureau, released Nov.
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da982333.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da982333.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da982333.wp
                    • a population of 6,140 and occupies only 40 square miles. The District contends that other cities within Maine having larger and more dense populations are classified as rural, and argue that the designation of Berwick as urban is derived from its close proximity to Portland.18 Federal Communications Commission DA 98-2333 19 District 267 Petition at 1. 20 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. 21 WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972) (WAIT Radio). 22 Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). 23 WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1157. 24 Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. 25 47 C.F.R. � 54.505(b)(3)(ii). See Universal Service Order, 12 FCC Rcd
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98082.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98082.wp
                    • lists the commenters and reply commenters in this proceeding. The comment deadline was August 16, 1996. The reply deadline was September 16, 1996. The Illinois Commerce Commission and the Telecommunications Resellers Association filed late comments, and GST Telecom Inc. and WinStar Communications Inc. filed late replies. We grant these commenters' motions to accept their late-filed pleadings. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (stating that "[a]ny provision of the rules may be waived by the Commission on its own motion or on petition if good cause therefor is shown"). 100 Many commenters use the phrase "cost recovery" in some contexts to refer to the distribution among carriers of the costs of providing number portability, and in other contexts to refer to the collection
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98271.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98271.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98271.wp
                    • are more credible. We advise BellSouth to respond, in future applications, with verifiable information refuting competitive LEC allegations. Likewise, we advise competitive LECs to respond with verifiable information refuting BellSouth's assertions and evidence. For example, in response to Sprint's allegation that it has experienced "ongoing" problems with loops, BellSouth asserts that between January 2, 1998 and August 14, 1998, only 1.3 percent of unbundled loops provided to Sprint had problems resulting in missed due dates. BellSouth adds that during this same period it met 91 percent of its due dates. Moreover, BellSouth claims that 97.5 percent of unbundled loop cutovers for Sprint were completed within the expected time interval.646 BellSouth's affiant, however, simply presents these figures without any supporting documentation or
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99206.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99206.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99206.wp
                    • Rcd at 21487. 32 Id. 33 Id. at 21488. 34 See 47 C.F.R. Part 69; see also MTS and WATS Market Structure, CC Docket No. 78-72, Phase I, Third Report and Order, 93 FCC 2d 241 (1983) (Access Charge Order). The Commission has not prescribed a special access rate structure. Access Charge Order, 93 FCC 2d at 314-15. 35 Section 1.3 permits the Commission to grant waivers of any of its rules if "good cause therefor is shown." 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. 36 See Northeast Cellular Telephone Company v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular); WAIT Radio v. FCC (WAIT Radio), 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969) ("Good cause" is interpreted to require petitioners to show that
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.txt
                    • terms of variability of transactions and service hours) and capture response times properly. We further find that, in addition to accommodating current demand, Bell Atlantic demonstrates that its pre-ordering systems and interfaces are scalable to handle reasonably foreseeable demand volumes. We base our conclusion on Bell Atlantic's current performance and KPMG's findings. We find that Bell Atlantic processed more than 1.3 million pre-ordering transactions from January through July 1999, with more than 200,000 processed in July alone. In addition, KPMG found that Bell Atlantic's pre-ordering interfaces and systems are capable of handling projected year-end 1999 volumes. KPMG also evaluated Bell Atlantic's network architecture and found that its systems have sufficient capacity to meet expected future usage volumes. We also reject assertions
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.txt
                    • services offered in the "limited corridors" established by the District Court in United States v. Western Electric Co., Inc., 569 F. Supp. 1057, 1107 (D.D.C. 1983). (xx) Toll dialing parity. "Toll dialing parity" exists when there is dialing parity, as defined in � 51.5 of this chapter, for toll services. (yy) Loop-based services. Loop-based services are services that employ Subcategory 1.3 facilities, as defined in � 36.154 of this chapter. (zz) Zone Average Revenue per Line. The Price Cap CMT Revenue per Line allocated to a particular state-defined zone used for deaveraging of UNE loop prices. The Zone Average Revenue per Line is computed according to the following formula: Zone Average Revenue Per Line = (25% * (Loopzone price + (Port)price))+
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00238.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00238.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00238.txt
                    • of the other five months for both interfaces, and thus conclude that the single shortfalls do not appear to reflect a systemic problem. For the months of December 1999 to April 2000, SWBT returned order confirmation notices for unbundled loop orders in an average of 0.9, 1.2, 2.0, 1.4 and 1.4 hours for LEX, and 2.3, 1.6, 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3 hours for orders submitted via EDI. See SWBT Aggregated Performance Data, Measurement No. 6 (``Average Time to Return FOC (Hours) - Mechanized'') (UNE Loop 1-50) (LEX) at 271-No. 6b, and (EDI) at 271-No. 6d. SWBT's performance for these months with respect to order confirmation notices for UNE-P and resale orders averaged 1.2, 1.0, 1.0, 0.6 and 0.6 hours for LEX
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00290.pdf
                    • number of municipalities in the Boston area with which RCN has agreements to offer service. 2/28/00 Bell Atlantic announces the first widespread rollout of DSL service to homes on Boston's South Shore, to be completed by July 1, 2000. 3/23/00 National Grid USA completes the buyout of New England Electric Systems and indicates plans to offer high-speed Internet access to 1.3 million homes in New England, including Boston's South Shore. A. Cable Modem Services 18. The incumbent cable provider, MediaOne, provides video service, residential cable modem service, and telephony service in Waltham. MediaOne was the first provider of this package of services in the area, beginning in September 1996. MediaOne provides no separate services for businesses, and will not build out
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00326.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00326.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00326.txt
                    • Reply Comments at 3; PCIA Comments at 6. NENA Reply Comments at 4, 5; APCO Reply Comments at 1, 2. E911 Third Report and Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 17425. Id. See VoiceStream June 15 Ex Parte Comments at 15, indicating that hybrid E-OTD technology can eventually achieve the same 50-meter accuracy level required for handset-based solutions. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) citing WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969). See E911 First Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 18710, 18718. We emphasize that the filing of a waiver request does not and will not excuse noncompliance with our E911 rules. Moreover, carriers are
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01029.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01029.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01029.txt
                    • information no weight in determining section 271 compliance. An exception to this approach exists for new information that is directly responsive to allegations raised in the comments. The Commission has also strictly limited the consideration of developments that occur after the date for filing comments. In this proceeding, we waive these procedural requirements on our own motion pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, to the extent necessary to consider rate reductions filed by SWBT on day 63 of the 90-day period for Commission review of the Kansas and Oklahoma section 271 applications. ``[A] waiver is appropriate only if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule and such deviation will serve the public interest.'' We conclude that the
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da972623.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da972623.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da972623.wp
                    • projections of demand and administrative expenses are as follows (revised figures are in bold): ($ millions) Program Program Demand Administrative Expenses Interest Income Total Program Costs Schools and Libraries 299.3 2.7 (2.0) 300.0 Rural Health Care 23.0 2.2[24]^(21) (0.2) 25.0 Subtotal 322.3 4.9 (2.2) 325.0 High Cost 434.0 1.1 (1.0) 434.1 Low Income 125.0 0.6 (0.3) 125.3 Subtotal 559.0 1.7 (1.3) 559.4 TOTAL 881.3 6.6 (3.5) 884.4 Based on information contained in the Universal Service Worksheets, FCC Form 457, USAC submitted the following information regarding end-user telecommunications revenues on November 13, 1997: Total Interstate, Intrastate, and International End-User Telecommunications Revenues from January 1, 1997 - June 30, 1997: $89.827 billion Total Interstate and International End-User Telecommunications Revenues from January 1, 1997
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/cr980413.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/cr980413.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/cr980413.wp
                    • SLC, and RHCC submitted the following projections of second quarter 1998 demand and administrative expenses: ($ millions) Program Program Demand Administrative Expenses Interest Income12 Total Program Costs Schools and Libraries 322.4 4.4 (1.8) 325.0 Rural Health Care 23.2 1.9 (0.1) 25.0 Subtotal 345.6 6.3 (1.9) 350.0 High Cost 431.1 0.9 (0.9) 431.1 Low Income 122.3 0.4 (0.3) 122.4 Subtotal 553.4 1.3 (1.2) 553.5 TOTAL 899.0 7.6 (3.1) 903.5 Based on information contained in the Universal Service Worksheets, FCC Form 457, USAC submitted end-user telecommunications revenues for the first half of 1997 on January 30, 1998. On February 24, 1998, USAC revised these revenue estimates to reflect newly-filed or revised Form 457 submissions and to exclude revenues from contributors that the Commission
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980413.html
                    • SLC, and RHCC submitted the following projections of second quarter 1998 demand and administrative expenses: ($ millions) Program Program Demand Administrative Expenses Interest Income[17]^(12) Total Program Costs Schools and Libraries 322.4 4.4 (1.8) 325.0 Rural Health Care 23.2 1.9 (0.1) 25.0 Subtotal 345.6 6.3 (1.9) 350.0 High Cost 431.1 0.9 (0.9) 431.1 Low Income 122.3 0.4 (0.3) 122.4 Subtotal 553.4 1.3 (1.2) 553.5 TOTAL 899.0 7.6 (3.1) 903.5 Based on information contained in the Universal Service Worksheets, FCC Form 457, USAC submitted end-user telecommunications revenues for the first half of 1997 on January 30, 1998. On February 24, 1998, USAC revised these revenue estimates to reflect newly-filed or revised Form 457 submissions and to exclude revenues from contributors that the Commission
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002912.pdf
                    • Michigan, Public Notice, DA 97-127 (Jan. 17, 1997); Revised Procedures for Bell Operating Company Applications Under Section 271 of the Communications Act, Public Notice, 13 FCC Rcd 17457 (Sept. 19, 1997); Updated Filing Requirements for Bell Operating Company Applications Under Section 271 of the Communications Act, Public Notice, DA-99-1994 (Sept. 28, 1999) (collectively "271 Procedural Public Notices"). 2 See section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. "to start the 90-day review process anew, or to accord such evidence no weight."3 Pursuant to our procedures governing section 271 applications4 and sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on such information. Comments must be filed by January 8, 2001
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/lcomp99-1.pdf
                    • available on the World Wide Web at . 19 Tables 2.3 and 2.4 do not contain about $2.3 billion of revenue from carriers that were considered de minimis for universal service contribution purposes. 12 [Note to electronic version: This page intentionally not numbered and left blank.] 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 7.5 0.2 9.0 0.4 3.1 16.1 1.8 14.0 1.3 12.3 10.7 0.6 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 Millions of Fiber Miles Chart 2.1 Fiber Miles Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers Competitive Access Providers 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 32% 88% 20% 72% 72% 15% 39% 14% 104% 15% 19% 62% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% Growth Rate Chart 2.2 Percentage Growth In
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/in-region_applications/bellsouth_la/bellsout.html
                    • Public Notice of Revised Comment Cycle on Application by BellSouth Corporation, BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., and BellSouth Long Distance, Inc., for Provision of In-Region, Interlata Services in Lousiana (CC Docket No. 98-121) [5]7/9/98 Public Notice Requesting Comments on BellSouth 271 Application __________________________________________________________________ 8/28/98 REPLY COMMENTS: * [6]Zip File (127 KB Zipped)-- (9 files, 732 KB Unzipped) 8/4/98 COMMENTS: * [7]Zip File (1.3 MB Zipped)-- (44 files, 5.2 MB Unzipped) __________________________________________________________________ To download a zip file: click on the highlighted file name above, then use your browser's normal save function to save the zip file to your computer. Once it's on your system, use an [8]unzip program to unzip the downloaded file. __________________________________________________________________ List of Reply Comments # Commenter Filename 1 Ameritech ameritec.doc
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/News_Releases/1998/et8002a.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/News_Releases/1998/et8002a.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/News_Releases/1998/et8002a.wp
                    • 5 27 1000.0 581.0 49332 1311 49268 1310 0.0 0.0 99.6 AL MOBILE 10 9 16.5 381.0 31418 1008 30422 998 0.0 0.0 99.9 AL MOBILE 15 47 494.6 521.0 25702 1024 25722 1039 1.7 1.0 99.6 AL MOBILE 21 20 198.9 436.0 21838 950 21326 882 0.3 0.1 100.0 AL MOBILE 42 41 50.0 183.0 11664 544 11453 533 1.3 0.5 100.0 AL MONTGOMERY 12 57 1000.0 610.0 43525 908 41216 868 0.0 0.0 99.9 AL MONTGOMERY 20 16 50.0 226.0 12730 369 12234 365 0.5 0.2 100.0 AL MONTGOMERY 26 14 50.0 183.0 12881 376 12595 372 4.0 2.9 100.0 AL MONTGOMERY 32 51 284.8 545.0 28418 538 28011 535 3.2 2.1 99.8 AL MONTGOMERY 45 46 50.0 308.0
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01158.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01158.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01158.txt
                    • 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. 47 C.F.R. �2.1(c). Letter from Dale N. Hatfield, Chief of the Office of Engineering and Technology, to Mitchell Lazarus, August 18, 2000. Application for Review, September 20, 2000. The Commission gave public notice of receipt of the Application for Review. See DA 00-2317, October 17, 2000. See 47 C.F.R. ��15.257(a), (b), (c), and (d). 47 C.F.R. �1.3 grants the Commission authority to waive any provision of its rules provided good cause is demonstrated. See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969). 5 U.S.C. � 603. See Joint Petition for Clarification or, in the Alternative, Partial Reconsideration filed October 25, 2000 in ET Docket 99-231 on behalf of 3Comm, Apple Computer, Cisco Systems,
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fc97115a.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fc97115a.wp
                    • 0.0 100.0 ALBIRMINGHAM 42 30 159.2 421.0 26381 1330 23781 1253 0.3 0.3 99.9 ALBIRMINGHAM 68 36 50.0 314.0 14449 1016 13255 977 0.0 0.0 99.5 ALDEMOPOLIS 41 19 50.0 333.0 15153 121 15040 121 0.4 0.4 100.0 ALDOTHAN 4 36 1000.0 573.0 48620 784 44475 765 0.0 0.0 99.7 ALDOTHAN 18 21 50.0 223.0 13976 291 13879 291 2.7 1.3 100.0 ALDOZIER 2 59 1000.0 210.0 25755 466 21786 298 0.0 0.0 98.7 ALFLORENCE 15 14 50.0 223.0 12858 286 12862 285 2.6 5.0 99.4 ALFLORENCE 26 20 50.0 230.0 12022 258 10994 240 1.8 1.1 100.0 ALFLORENCE 36 22 50.0 221.0 12336 261 12098 259 8.1 3.6 100.0 ALGADSDEN 44 45 50.0 303.0 12500 628 11830 523 1.6 1.1
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024.pdf
                    • from KUHT-TV's transmitter site. UHS submits that it has obtained the tentative agreement of Civic Communication Corp. (Civic), the licensee of KTRE-TV, to KUHT-TV's use of channel 9 for DTV service, with ERP up to a maximum of 8.4 kW. UHS states that it has committed to resolve interference problems that might result to KTRE-TV, including potential power reductions to 1.3 kW. On June 16, 1997, UHS submitted a letter from Mr. Errol R. Kapellusch, Senior Vice President and General Manager of Civic License Holding Company, the licensee of KTRE-TV, consenting to operation of KUHT's DTV service on channel 9, based on a maximum power of 8.4 kW. Mr. Kapellusch further conditions his consent on KUHT-TV's agreement that in the event
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024a.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024a.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024a.wp
                    • 5 27 1000.0 581.0 49332 1311 49268 1310 0.0 0.0 99.6 AL MOBILE 10 9 16.5 381.0 31418 1008 30422 998 0.0 0.0 99.9 AL MOBILE 15 47 494.6 521.0 25702 1024 25722 1039 1.7 1.0 99.6 AL MOBILE 21 20 198.9 436.0 21838 950 21326 882 0.3 0.1 100.0 AL MOBILE 42 41 50.0 183.0 11664 544 11453 533 1.3 0.5 100.0 AL MONTGOMERY 12 57 1000.0 610.0 43525 908 41216 868 0.0 0.0 99.9 AL MONTGOMERY 20 16 50.0 226.0 12730 369 12234 365 0.5 0.2 100.0 AL MONTGOMERY 26 14 50.0 183.0 12881 376 12595 372 4.0 2.9 100.0 AL MONTGOMERY 32 51 284.8 545.0 28418 538 28011 535 3.2 2.1 99.8 AL MONTGOMERY 45 46 50.0 308.0
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1998/fcc98078.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1998/fcc98078.wp
                    • have no competitive alternative in this market. On the other hand, in the occasional-use multiple carrier market, U.S. consumers have competitive alternatives to Comsat. We next assess the competitors and Comsat's market power in each of these product and geographic markets identified. 2.Market Participants Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-78 98 See 1992 Horizontal Merger Guidelines, 57 Fed. Reg. at 41556 �1.3 ("1992 Merger Guidelines") . 99 Id. 100 Barriers to entry represent anything that prevents an entrepreneur from instantaneously creating a new firm in a market. See Dennis W. Carlton and Jeffrey M. Perloff, Modern Industrial Organization, 919 (2d ed. 1994). 29 50. After determining the relevant service and geographic markets, the next step in our competitive analysis is to analyze
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1999/da990633.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1999/da990633.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1999/da990633.wp
                    • DIRECTV submitted a separate application to transfer control of two transmit/receive earth stations (Call Signs E930485 and E950153) from USSB to DIRECTV. That application was previously granted by the Satellite and Radiocommunication Division. USSB II, Inc., Consent to Transfer Control, File No. SES-T/C-19981217-01925 (March 15, 1999). See also Public Notice, Report No. SES-00061 (March 17, 1999). 2 47 C.F.R � 1.3. 3 47 U.S.C. � 100.19(a). 4 Application of USSB II, File No. 45-SAT-EXT-97, IBFS File No.: SAT-MOD-19970226-00020 (Feb. 26, 1997) ("USSB Extension Application"). 5 CBS, Inc., For Authority to Establish Interim Direct Broadcast Satellite Systems, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 92 FCC 2d 64 (1982) ("CBS I"). CBS Inc., For Modification of Construction Permit to Establish Interim Direct Broadcast Satellite Systems,
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2001/fcc01329.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2001/fcc01329.txt
                    • definition of the relevant geographic scope of relevant markets, see United States v. Philadelphia Nat'l Bank, 374 U.S. 321, 359 (1963) (defining relevant geographic market as an area in which a buyer may purchase a product or service from alternative sources, or in which the presence of other sellers restrains prices charged to buyers). 120 See 1992 Merger Guidelines � 1.3. 121 See, e.g. Philadelphia Nat'l Bank, 374 U.S. at 363 ("[A] significant increase in the concentration . . . must be enjoined in the absence of evidence clearly showing that the merger is not likely to have such anticompetitive effects."). See also 1992 Horizontal Guidelines at 41558 �� 2.1, 2.2; New York v. Kraft General Foods, 926 F. Supp. 321,
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98315.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98315.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98315.wp
                    • 5 27 1000.0 581.0 49332 1311 49268 1310 0.0 0.0 99.6 AL MOBILE 10 9 16.5 381.0 31418 1008 30422 998 0.0 0.0 99.9 AL MOBILE 15 47 494.6 521.0 25702 1024 25722 1039 1.7 1.0 99.6 AL MOBILE 21 20 198.9 436.0 21838 950 21326 882 0.3 0.1 100.0 AL MOBILE 42 41 50.0 183.0 11664 544 11453 533 1.3 0.5 100.0 AL MONTGOMERY 12 57 1000.0 610.0 43525 908 41216 868 0.0 0.0 99.9 AL MONTGOMERY 20 16 50.0 226.0 12730 369 12234 365 0.5 0.2 100.0 AL MONTGOMERY 26 14 50.0 183.0 12881 376 12595 372 4.0 2.9 100.0 AL MONTGOMERY 32 51 284.8 545.0 28418 538 28011 535 3.2 2.1 99.8 AL MONTGOMERY 45 46 50.0 308.0
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1999/fcc99209.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1999/fcc99209.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1999/fcc99209.wp
                    • ownership, which promises would be enforced by the Commission.184 Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-209 185 See Louis DeArias, 11 FCC Rcd 3662, 3667 (1996) (delegating to staff authority to rule on uncontested one-to-a-market waiver requests that involve a proposed combination of 1 TV, 2 AM, and 2 FM stations in the top 100 television markets). 186 See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Wait Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972). 187 Any existing combination based on a five-factor waiver can be transferred together only if the combination meets our revised radio/TV cross-ownership rule or failed station waiver standard, at the time of transfer. 188 See, e.g., S.E. Licensee G.P., FCC 96-464 (released Nov. 27,
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2001/fcc01123.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2001/fcc01123.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2001/fcc01123.txt
                    • WB Petition at 21). WB Petition at 21. Davis Opposition at 2-6 (citing Carolina Petition at 1-3; Kelly Petition at 11-14; WB Petition at 21). KM Reply at 5 (citing Section 336(f)(2)(A)(i)(II)). PAI Petition at 5-7(citing Report and Order at �� 17-20); Univision Petition at 6-7. Report and Order at � 20. PAI Petition at 7. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. 47 U.S.C. � 336(f)(2)(A)(i)(III). 47 U.S.C. � 336(f)(2)(A)(ii). Report and Order at �� 23-31. IBN Petition at 1-2; Tiger Eye Petition at 4-6. CBA Petition at 11-12; Grossman Petition at 2. Report and Order at �� 21-31. Report and Order at � 23. Tiger Eye Petition at 4-6. Id. at 4-5. See Main Studio and Program Origination Rules, 2 FCC
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2001/fcc01330.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2001/fcc01330.txt
                    • the signal strength requirements for the community of license. 63 See, e.g., Petitions for Reconsideration of MSTV/NAB/ALTV at 9; Joint Broadcasters at 5; APTS/PBS at 8; Delta College at 2-4; 64 Petition for Reconsideration of APTS/PBS at 8-9. 65 Of course, the Commission may waive any provision of its rules upon a showing of good cause. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Specifically, the FCC may exercise its discretion to waive a rule where "particular facts would make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest" and where "special circumstances" might warrant a waiver. WAIT (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 01-330 17 D. Construction Deadlines 41. A number of petitioners request that the Commission extend the May 1, 2002 DTV construction deadline for
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/News_Releases/1998/nrmc8022.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/News_Releases/1998/nrmc8022.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/News_Releases/1998/nrmc8022.wp
                    • be unnecessarily dependent on the rest of society, and it deprives this country of the wealth of ideas and ability that people with disabilities have. With the demand for accessible telecommunications, Kennard said, people with disabilities have expanded employment opportunities. He noted "there is simply no industry in America with the opportunity for well-paying jobs like telecommunications. The U.S. needs 1.3 million new workers in information technology by 2006. People with disabilities can and should fill many of those jobs. "The fact is, that if we do things right, the burgeoning world of telecommunications should make it easier for those with disabilities to have meaningful, well-paid jobs. More and more, people will not have to hop in a car and drive
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp31.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp31.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp31.txt
                    • interacting with one another in an online community. The growth of the Internet is nothing short of explosive, driven by the invention in this decade of the World Wide Web, which gives consumers a user-friendly platform from which to access content in the online world. In 1993, the year the first commercial web browser hit the consumer market, there were 1.3 million computers linked to the Internet. In four short years, that number reached over 16 million, and an estimated 80 million Americans are online today. Americans are using the Internet to communicate with each other like never before, as email has become the communications medium of choice for millions of users. And the Internet is an unprecedented educational tool as
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Comments/fcc98055/210097-1.pdf
                    • startup - 1 percent. The tables below show the calculations from this model. 46 Program Type A B C D Average % MIX: 31.0 48.8 20.0 .2 100 * Months Months Months Months Months Function HC Min Max HC Min Max HC Min Max HC MinMaxHCMinMax Research 2 0.5 1 4 1 3 10 3 6 20 6 12 5 1.3 3 Specs/Design 3 1 2 6 3 8 20 10 18 100 18 24 8 3.88.17 Proto to Manuf 3 1 5 6 5 10 20 18 24 100 24 36 8 6.411.3 Manuf Startup 6 1 2 10 2 8 30 6 12 160 12 24 13 2.56.97 Total 3.5 10 11 29 37 60 60 96 14 29.4
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/fcc99022.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/fcc99022.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/fcc99022.wp
                    • accordingly we grant their applications for transfer of control. II. BACKGROUND A. The Applicants 2. PRTA is an instrumentality of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico ("Government").5 PRTA wholly owns PRTC, which is Puerto Rico's leading provider of telecommunications services, including local exchange, intra-island long distance, wireless, and Internet access services, in both business and residential markets.6 PRTC serves more than 1.3 million access lines, more than 155,000 cellular subscribers, and more than 237,000 paging customers.7 In addition to its cellular and paging licenses, PRTC holds licenses in Puerto Rico in the personal communications service (PCS), narrowband rural radiotelephone, common carrier point-to-point microwave, digital electronic messaging, telephone maintenance and private carrier paging, and fixed satellite services. 3. GTE Holdings is a wholly-owned
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00053.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00053.txt
                    • marketed its IS-661 models at tradeshows, in brochures, by direct sales to prospective PCS operators and direct sales to major manufacturers, such as Nortel, which paid several million dollars for IS-661 licensing rights and, in 1995, began marketing IS-661. Id. at 36, 41. Omnipoint Opposition at 15-17, 20, 26-28. Third Report and Order, 9 FCC Rcd at 1339 n.11. Section 1.3 of our rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that, for good cause shown, we may grant waivers of our rules either pursuant to a request or on our own motion. As discussed above, we believe that Omnipoint has shown that good cause exists for a waiver of the substantial use condition. VoiceStream/Omnipoint Public Interest Statement at 6, 11. Id. at
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00313.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00313.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00313.txt
                    • Atlantic, BellSouth, and GTE only supplied very general assertions that, absent lifting of the cap, they would face considerable difficulty rolling out 3G and other advanced broadband services. We agree with most of the commenters to the petitions that the petitioners failed to satisfy the waiver standard set forth either in the Biennial CMRS Spectrum Cap Order or in Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules. We also agree that Bell Atlantic failed to establish the basis for reversing our determination that the spectrum cap promoted the public interest, as would be necessary for granting a forbearance request. Finally, we find unpersuasive GTE's argument that the CMRS spectrum cap does not apply to the C and F block spectrum in the upcoming
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00366.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00366.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00366.txt
                    • antenna that: (1) provides adequate notice regarding potential radiofrequency safety hazards, e.g., information regarding the safe minimum separation distance required between users and transceiver antennas; and (2) references the applicable FCC-adopted limits for radiofrequency exposure specified in � 1.1310 of this chapter. (d) Local governments or associations may apply to the Commission for a waiver of this section under � 1.3. Waiver requests must comply with the procedures in paragraphs (f) and (h) of this section and will be put on public notice. The Commission may grant a waiver upon a showing by the applicant of local concerns of a highly specialized or unusual nature. No petition for waiver shall be considered unless it specifies the restriction at issue. Waivers granted
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000318.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000318.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000318.txt
                    • C and F block spectrum. Comments submitted in response to those Public Notices may, to the extent relevant, be incorporated by reference in comments submitted in response to this Public Notice. Commenters should address the sufficiency of the showings made by AT&T Wireless, BellSouth and Bell Atlantic in light of the requirements of 47 U.S.C. � 160, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 and any other public interest considerations. All comments should reference the DA number of this Public Notice (DA 00-318). Comments should be filed with the Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, TW B204, 445 12th St. S.W. Washington, DC 20554. Comments also should be provided to Steven Weingarten, Chief, Commercial Wireless Division, Room # 4-C224, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Federal
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Reports/fcc00289.pdf
                    • percent of the total U.S. population, have three or more different operators (cellular, PCS, and/or Nextel) offering mobile telephone service in the counties in which they live. However, these counties make up only 35 percent of the total land area of the United States, reflecting the nation's uneven population distribution. On the other hand, the land area of these counties, 1.3 million square miles, is roughly equal to the combined land area of the 15 members of the European Union. Over 173 million people, or 69 percent of the U.S. population, live in areas with five or more mobile telephone operators competing to offer service. And 11 million people, or 4 percent of the population, can choose from among seven different
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
                    • 9.92 0 7.1 5.26 5.46 10 12.2 0 5.29 0 PR-4-05-2341 % Missed Appointment � Verizon � No Dispatch 0.37 0 0 0 0 1.69 0 0 0 2.04 PR-4-08-2341 % Missed Appt. � Customer � Late Order Conf. 0 0 0 0 0 PR-6 � Installation Quality PR-6-01-2341 % Install. Troubles Reported within 30 Days 1.94 2.76 1.41 2.06 1.3 1.18 1.04 0 0.61 1 PR-6-03-2341 % Install. Troubles Reported w/in 30 Days - FOK/TOK/CPE 4.07 1.66 3.72 3.09 2.44 0.59 1.46 2.67 PR-8 � Open Orders in a Hold Status PR-8-01-2341 Open Orders in a Hold Status > 30 Days 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PR-8-02-2341 Open Orders in a Hold Status > 90
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Reports/biennial2000report.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Reports/biennial2000report.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Reports/biennial2000report.txt
                    • inter alia, the enforcement of such regulation or provision is not necessary for the protection of consumers and if forbearance is consistent with the public interest. 47 U.S.C. � 160(a). In determining whether forbearance is consistent with the public interest, the Commission must consider whether forbearance would enhance competition among telecommunications service providers. 47 U.S.C. � 160(b). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. 47 U.S.C. � 161. See Appendix II for a listing of the completed and ongoing proceedings that were initiated as a result of the 1998 Biennial Regulatory Review. This includes consideration of how adroitly, precisely, and cost-effectively the rule addresses the problem at issue. This includes consideration of whether the rule is over- or under-inclusive in its scope, and whether
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2008budget_complete.pdf
                    • informal working groups to look at issues on the agenda for the WRC-07. In preparation for WRC-07, the WAC has produced over 40 recommendations for the Commission. The various conference agenda items have been initially assigned to the informal working groups as follows: Informal Working Groups (IWG) Agenda Items (Major WRC-07 Issues) IWG-1 � Terrestrial and Space Science Services 1.2, 1.3, 1.5, 1.14, 1.16, & 1.20 IWG-2 � Satellite Services including those related to High Altitude Platform Stations (HAPS) 1.6 (Resolution 415), 1.7, 1.8, 1.17, 1.18, 1.19, & 1.21) IWG-3 � International Mobile Telephone (IMT-2000) & 2.5 GHz 1.4 & 1.9 IWG-4 � Broadcasting and Amateur Services 1.6 (Resolution 414), 1.11, 1.13, 1.15, & 7.1 (Recommendation 952) IWG-5 � Regulatory Issues
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Abernathy/Statements/2002/stkqa204.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Abernathy/Statements/2002/stkqa204.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Abernathy/Statements/2002/stkqa204.txt
                    • will allow the public safety community to utilize the latest technological tools - through real time video displays, Internet access, and other capabilities - in respond to emergency situations. International Considerations: As we prepare for the 2003 World Radiocommunication Conference in Caracas, the U.S. is examining the value of a possible global allocation for public protection use. WRC Agenda Item 1.3 is actually the topic of an ITU Working Group meeting in Rome as we speak. Going forward, it is important that any international allocation decision grant respective administrations significant flexibility, while also identifying multiple possible bands for such use. In this regard, the United States must be vigilant that the international decisions reached include bands identified domestically - such as
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/Statements/2000/stwek007.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/Statements/2000/stwek007.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/Statements/2000/stwek007.txt
                    • very day. Finally, partly because of the downward pressure we have brought to bear on international settlement rates, international call rates dropped 25% from 1996 to 1998. New York State For a look at the future of the 1996 Act, look at New York State. That is where the Act is working now. Competitive local carriers there already serve over 1.3 million business and residential telephone lines, and over 55% of those lines are delivered over the competitors' own facilities. Worldcom alone has over 200,000 local unbundled lines. AT&T was scheduled to add 30,000 unbundled lines last month (December), for an estimated total of 80,000 unbundled lines. Incumbents I also want to tip my hat to the Bell Companies. For all
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/Statements/stwek972.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/Statements/stwek972.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/Statements/stwek972.txt
                    • large measure to their exceptional skills. Much credit here also goes to the New York State Public Service Commission in pioneering work on the requirements and indices of local competition. And to the Department of Justice for their tireless vigilance and their expert insight. The progress of local competition in New York is impressive. Competitive local carriers already serve over 1.3 million business and residential telephone lines, and over 55% of those lines are delivered over the competitors' own facilities. The states are becoming the laboratories for innovation in local competition, and we look forward to many paths toward this end. Third, the road to this moment has not been easy. Shifting a $100 billion market even a few degrees is
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/spwek807.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/spwek807.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/spwek807.wp
                    • express your concerns to the Commission. And we want to meet those concerns. So far, I've talked about access. Access to the Commission. Access to the rulemaking process. And access to telecommunications. Now I want to talk about education and training. There is simply no industry in America with the opportunity for well-paying jobs like telecommunications. None. The U.S. needs 1.3 million new workers in information technology by 2006. The hi-tech industry was the single largest industry in the United States in 1996. People with disabilities can and should fill many of those jobs. After all, is there any doubt -- any at all -- that they can compete, and are even pace-setters, in the world of science and technology? Whether
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/spwek809.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/spwek809.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/spwek809.wp
                    • the home -- four out of every ten homes have a personal computer. You see it on the street when every second person walking down Michigan Avenue in this city seems to have a cell phone the size of a wallet pressed to his ear. Telecommunications is now 14% of the economy -- and growing. The United States will need 1.3 million new workers in information technology over the next eight years. We're going to need 95,000 new computer scientists, analysts and programmers each year. Revolutionary change in our economic life. Revolutionary change in our social life. I often say that the Information Highway can bring us together as a Nation, or it can divide us. It's not unlike the conventional
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/spwek815.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/spwek815.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/spwek815.wp
                    • 10 homes have a PC. You see it on the street when every second person walking down the street seems to have a cell phone the size of a wallet pressed to the ear. Skilled labor today requires the ability to use computers and telecommunications. Telecommunications is now 14% of the economy -- and growing. The United States will need 1.3 million new workers in information technology over the next eight years. We're going to need 95,000 new computer scientists, analysts and programmers each year. How do we make sure the Information Highway has on-ramps and off-ramps into every neighborhood? How do we avoid creating a country of information haves and have-nots? How do we make sure this revolution in communications
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/spwek816.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/spwek816.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/spwek816.wp
                    • University writing course to students in Israel and Kenya, you're not just watching a revolution. You're in it. Four in 10 American families have a personal computer in their homes. More Americans make semiconductors than work in construction. By the year 2000, 46 million Americans will be buying products on line. What about jobs? Well, the United States will need 1.3 million new workers in information technology occupations by 2006. Well over 100,000 a year. That's like graduating a class like yours every day, seven days a week for ten years, just to keep up. Tremendous opportunity -- for those prepared to seize it. Your generation will benefit from information technology more than any other generation in history. Newsweek wrote about
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/spwek818.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/spwek818.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/spwek818.wp
                    • their time and dedication to the work of the Committee. I have learned a lot from you and from Kevin McCarty, your Washington representative. Why do we need to work together? Because, make no mistake about it, telecommunications policy is about jobs and education for your cities. Let's talk about jobs. By the year 2006, the United States will need 1.3 million new workers in Information Technology core occupations of the Information Technology sector. Well over 100,000 a year. We must have an educational system that produces skilled workers to meet that demand. You know, when I meet with the CEOs who run high tech businesses, telecommunications policy is not the top issue on their agenda. It's education. They know that
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/spwek824.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/spwek824.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/spwek824.wp
                    • a new infrastructure being built that offers new hope. It is an information infrastructure of digital communications and computers, carried by wire, cable, satellite, and microwaves -- and it is recasting our world. Telecommunications represents 14% of our gross national product. Eight out of every ten new jobs are in information-intensive sectors of the economy. The United States will need 1.3 million new workers in information technology over the next eight years. We're going to need 95,000 new computer scientists, analysts, and programmers each year. Some say we should import these skills from outside the country. I say let's train the people who are already here. And these statistics don't even begin to tell the story of how communications and computers
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/spwek835.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/spwek835.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/spwek835.wp
                    • in a brave new world that will be characterized increasingly by new broadband media services: wireless, cable, DBS, and the Internet. Advances in technology are fundamentally changing the way we live. By the year 2,000 over 60 percent of all jobs in the United States will require computer knowledge and experience. In the next eight years, the U.S. will need 1.3 million new workers in information technology, and 95,000 new computer scientists, analysts and programmers, each year. These changes signal enormous opportunities. Americans with technical skills, regardless of race or income, will have the necessary tools to succeed and compete in an information age economy. As technology takes quantum leaps forward, African Americans and people of color cannot afford to be
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Powell/Statements/2002/stmkp211.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Powell/Statements/2002/stmkp211.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Powell/Statements/2002/stmkp211.txt
                    • calculations here. [30][10] Significantly the sum total of the entire range of EPFDs across all 32 markets and all three satellites is less than 8 dB. We note that DBS providers would have the right to petition for special relief from our rules even if we chose not to adopt a specific safety valve procedure. See, e.g., 47 CFR 1.2, 1.3. [31][11] Similarly the dissent criticizes the model for failing to weight the rainfall data based on the population. For example by weighting Los Angeles at four times the weight given to Denver based on population. Yet if such weighting were to occur it would only further diminish the weight given to the rural areas that the dissent later argues need
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Tristani/Statements/2001/stgt124.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Tristani/Statements/2001/stgt124.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/Tristani/Statements/2001/stgt124.txt
                    • relevant geographic scope of relevant markets, see United States v. Philadelphia Nat'l Bank, 374 U.S. 321, 359 (1963) (defining relevant geographic market as an area in which a buyer may purchase a product or service from alternative sources, or in which the presence of other sellers restrains prices charged to buyers). See Merger Guidelines, 57 Fed. Reg. at 41556-41557 � 1.3. See, e.g. Philadelphia Nat'l Bank, 374 U.S. at 363 (``[A] significant increase in the concentration . . . must be enjoined in the absence of evidence clearly showing that the merger is not likely to have such anticompetitive effects.''). See also Merger Guidelines at 41558 �� 2.1, 2.2; New York v. Kraft General Foods, 926 F. Supp. 321, 359 (S.D.N.Y.
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/misc/statements/bafranca.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/misc/statements/bafranca.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Speeches/misc/statements/bafranca.txt
                    • receivers could potentially experience degradation from interference is small, generally 1 km or less. This interference analysis is shown in the following table: LPFM Potential Interference Radius Based on NAB Tests Receiver Category Desired Signal Level -45 dBm (Close to Station) -55 dBm (~Principle Community) -65 dBm (~Protected Service) Clock 0.3 km (0.2 mi.) 0.7 km (0.4 mi.) 2.1 km (1.3 mi.) Portable 1.0 km (0.6 mi.) 0.9 km (0.6 mi.) 1.0 km (0.6 mi.) Personal 0.4 km (0.3 mi.) 0.5 km (0.3 mi.) 0.5 km (0.3 mi.) The above Table shows the approximate radius around an LPFM station where interference could potentially occur to a 3rd adjacent channel full service station with different types of radios, based on the NAB
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/cgb/dro/comments/99339/5507117144.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/cgb/dro/comments/99339/5507117144.txt
                    • 8:WPM4l:OOPM MTWTFSS 8:00PM-1l:OOPM MTWTFSS B:WPM-1l:WPM MTWTFSS &WPM-1l:WPM MTWTFSS 8:WPM.1l:OOPM MTWTFSS I:WPM-1l:WPM MTWTFSS 8:00PM-1l:OOPM MTWTF8.S &OOPM-1l:OOPM MTWTFSS 8:WPM-11 :OOPH MTWTFSS8:WPM-1l:WPM MTWTFSS .SzWPM-1l:OOPM MTWTFSS 8:OOPM.11 :WPM MTWTFSS &OOPM-1 1 :OOPM For explanatiin of symbols, see Boilerplate. Copyright 2000 Nielsen Media Research 1607 1511 1348 1303 1221 1077 944 933 658 607 546 541 540 503 458 419 356 329 295 1.6 1.5 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.1 0.9 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 04 0.4 03 0.3 2.7 2.6 2.2 2.2 2.2 2 1.9 1.5 1.5 1.2 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.5 56.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 50.7 56.7 56.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 NielsenN National People Meter
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/cgb/dro/csd_letter.html
                    • March 10, 2009 (CG Docket No. 03-123). 2 Letter from William Banks, General Counsel, CSDVRS, to Thomas Chandler, Chief, Disability Rights Office dated June 24, 2009 (CG Docket No. 03-123). 3 This percentage is based on data we received from the Fund administrator. 4 47 C.F.R. 64.604(c)(5)(iii)(E). Generally, the Commission's rules may be waived for good cause shown. 47 C.F.R. 1.3. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular); see also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969). We find that CSDVRS's explanation for not complying with this
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/cgb/dro/trs_history_docket.html
                    • and being denied compensation from the TRS Fund. In light of these impending deadlines for initial and recertification applications, and to avoid waste, fraud, and abuse in the VRS program, the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau finds that good cause exists in this instance to alter the comment periods specified in Section 1.429 of the Commission's rules. See 47 C.F.R. 1.3 (providing for suspension, amendment, or waiver of Commission rules, in whole or in part, for good cause shown, and on the Commission's own motion). Accordingly, oppositions to Sorenson's and/or AT&T's petitions for reconsideration of the Second Report and Order shall be filed no later than October 7, 2011, and replies to oppositions will be due no later October 12, 2011.
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/cgb/dro/vc_notic.doc
                    • telephone does not meet some of the technical requirements of this section. A request for waiver of one or more requirements of Part 68 does not excuse an applicant from meeting the requirements for which the applicant did not request waiver. The Commission will not waive any provision of its rules unless good cause is shown, see 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Under the relevant case law, the applicant has the burden of showing good cause for a waiver: "[a]n applicant [for a waiver] faces a high hurdle even at the starting gate." WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969). Nevertheless, an agency must take a "hard look" at applications for waiver, id., and must consider all relevant
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-256485A1.html
                    • of any RMTs being received or transmitted. The printouts that were available indicated that the LP-2 station was not being monitored and that no RWT from the LP-1 station was received during this period of time. No log entries existed in any station log identifying the cause of any equipment failures or any actions taken to remedy any equipment failures. 1.3. On October 25, 2004, the FCC's San Diego office sent a letter of inquiry (``LOI'') to Lazer concerning the operation and condition of the KXRS EAS equipment and questioned the station's recordkeeping of outages and repairs.3 In its response to the LOI, Lazer admitted that the power supply of their EAS equipment failed in the ``fall of 2003 rendering the
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-260117A1.html
                    • these tests were retransmitted. EAS logs also indicated that numerous RWTs were not transmitted by KCEC-FM and numerous RWTs were not received from either designated LP-1 or LP-2 stations during this same period. No entries were made by KCEC-FM staff in the EAS log to identify the causes of these failures or what steps were taken to remedy any failures. 1.3. On April 22, 2005, the San Diego agent spoke with the KCEC-FM's Chief Engineer. The Chief Engineer acknowledged that problems were found with the EAS equipment during the engineer's inspection of the station's EAS equipment on April 9, 2005. Specifically, he indicated that the EAS equipment was originally set for the automatic mode to receive and to forward the information
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-262295A1.html
                    • according to Mr. Peterson. The San Diego agent observed that KBSZ(AM) maintained no EAS logs and had no way to monitor any EAS alerts at its station. The agent then contacted KSWG(FM) by telephone and requested that KSWG(FM) conduct an EAS weekly test. The agent monitored station KBSZ(AM) and noted that the EAS test signal from KSWG(FM) was being relayed. 1.3. On August 18, 2005, the San Diego agent contacted the KSWG(FM) general manager. The general manager told the agent that KSWG(FM) did not have any agreement with KBSZ(AM) to continue sharing EAS equipment since KBSZ(AM) was sold to the Petersons in 2001. The general manager also told the agent that he was not aware that KSWG(FM) continued to share its
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-263779A1.html
                    • KPAL-LP's EAS equipment. The inspection revealed that KPAL-LP's EAS equipment was not operational. Specifically, the agent found that the EAS equipment was not connected to the station transmitter, that the EAS equipment was programmed to monitor only one local primary (``LP-1'') source, and that the station had not received or transmitted a required monthly test (``RMT'') for over 18 months. 1.3. On November 2, 2005, the Los Angeles Office arranged for the LP-1 to transmit a required weekly test (``RWT''). The test revealed that KPAL-LP's EAS equipment failed to receive the RWT. 1.4. On November 3, 2005, the Los Angeles Office received a fax from KPAL stating that the EAS equipment at KPAL- LP had been installed and was now receiving
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da012158.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da012158.html
                    • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of AT&T Corp. to Extend Time in Which to Convert Informal Complaints to Formal Complaints and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da012159.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da012159.html
                    • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of Sprint IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section 1.718 of our rules, 47
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da012428.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da012428.pdf
                    • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of AT&T Corp. to Extend Time in Which to Convert Informal Complaints to Formal Complaints and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da012551.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da012551.pdf
                    • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of AT&T Corp. to Extend Time in Which to Convert Informal Complaints to Formal Complaints and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01173.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01173.html
                    • segment. January 16, 2001 Letter at Attachment B, Attachment 1 at � 2.1; Answer at 3, � 5; COMSAT Brief at 4; IDB Supplemental Brief at 4. See January 16, 2001 Letter at Exhibit A. Id. at Exhibit A, � 1.8. Id. at Exhibit A, Annex A, � 1.1. Id. at Exhibit A, � 2.3. Id. at Exhibit A, � 1.3. See February 2, 2001 Letter at 1. COMSAT Brief at 4, 7, 9; IDB Mobile Communications, Inc. v. COMSAT Corporation, IDB Mobile Communications, Inc. Final Reply, File No. E-97-48 (filed Mar. 9, 1998) at 10-11 (``IDB Reply''). IDB Mobile Communications, Inc. v. COMSAT Corporation, Reply Brief of COMSAT Corporation, File No. E-97-48 (filed Mar. 9, 1998) at 3 (``COMSAT Reply'');
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-104A1.html
                    • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 6. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Petition for Additional Extension of Time filed by Indiana Paging Network, Inc. IS GRANTED. 7. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-1065A1.html
                    • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of AT&T Corp. Requesting Additional Extension of Time in Which to Convert Informal Complaint Against CTC Telcom to Formal Complaint and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-1072A1.html
                    • Informal Complaint.21 Indiana Paging indicates that it has settled its dispute with the final remaining defendant, Verizon. Thus, Indiana Paging requests that the Commission dismiss its informal complaint and terminate this proceeding. 10. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Partial Withdrawal and Request for Dismissal of Informal Complaint filed by Indiana Paging Network, Inc. IS GRANTED and this proceeding IS TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Radhika V. Karmarkar Deputy Chief, Market
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-1890A1.html
                    • deadline for the conversion of these EUCL informal complaints into formal complaints. 7 Because this extension will facilitate the possible settlement of these numerous claims, we are satisfied that our action today serves the public interest. 3. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), 208, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, and the authority delegated by sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.011 and 0.311, that section 1.718(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.718(a), IS HEREBY WAIVED, with regard to the IPP EUCL informal complaints described herein and the deadline for the conversion and filing of these informal complaints
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-2070A1.html
                    • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that CTC Communications, Inc.'s Consent Motion For Extension of Time To File Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-210A1.html
                    • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of AT&T Corp. to Extend Time in Which to Convert Informal Complaints to Formal Complaints and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-2204A1.html
                    • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of Complainants For Extension of Time In Which To Convert Informal Complaints To Formal Complaint and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-2340A1.html
                    • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of Complainants For Extension of Time In Which To Convert Informal Complaints To Formal Complaint and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-2511A1.html
                    • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 5. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Waiver of Commission Rule 1.718(a) IS GRANTED. 6. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section 1.718 of our
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-2552A1.html
                    • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of Complainants For Extension of Time In Which To Convert Informal Complaints To Formal Complaint and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-259A1.html
                    • deadline for the conversion of these EUCL informal complaints into formal complaints. 8 Because this extension will facilitate the possible settlement of these numerous claims, we are satisfied that our action today serves the public interest. 4. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), 208, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, and the authority delegated by sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.011 and 0.311, that section 1.718(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.718(a), IS HEREBY WAIVED, with regard to the IPP EUCL informal complaints described herein and the deadline for the conversion and filing of these informal complaints
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-2758A1.html
                    • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Fourth Consent Motion of Complainants For Extension of Time In Which To Convert Informal Complaints To Formal Complaint and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-3013A1.html
                    • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Fifth Consent Motion of Complainants For Extension of Time In Which To Convert Informal Complaints To Formal Complaint and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-3182A1.html
                    • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Sixth Consent Motion of Complainants For Extension of Time In Which To Convert Informal Complaints To Formal Complaint and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-323A1.html
                    • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Partial Withdrawal of Informal Complaint and Petition for Additional Extension of Time filed by Indiana Paging Network, Inc. IS GRANTED. 8. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order,
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-3305A1.html
                    • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Seventh Consent Motion of Complainants For Extension of Time In Which To Convert Informal Complaints To Formal Complaint and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-3342A1.html
                    • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-3343A1.html
                    • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-3344A1.html
                    • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-3345A1.html
                    • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-3346A1.html
                    • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-3401A1.html
                    • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-3414A1.html
                    • of complaint proceedings, and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3, 1.716-18, and 1.720- 1.736 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.716-18, 1.720-36, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Joint Motion to Convert Case IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-3467A1.html
                    • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Eighth Consent Motion of Complainants For Extension of Time In Which To Convert Informal Complaints To Formal Complaint and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-3492A1.html
                    • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of Complainant For Extension of Time In Which To Convert Informal Complaint To Formal Complaint and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-35A1.html
                    • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of AT&T Corp. to Extend Time in Which to Convert Informal Complaints to Formal Complaints and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-360A1.html
                    • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of AT&T Corp. to Extend Time in Which to Convert Informal Complaints to Formal Complaints and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the informal complaints
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-450A1.html
                    • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of AT&T Corp. to Extend Time in Which to Convert Other Informal Complaints to Formal Complaints and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-597A1.html
                    • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of AT&T Corp. Requesting An Additional Extension of Time in Which to Convert Other Informal Complaints to Formal Complaints and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-707A1.html
                    • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 8. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Partial Withdrawal of Informal Complaint and Petition for Additional Extension of Time filed by Indiana Paging Network, Inc. IS GRANTED. 9. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order,
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-721A1.html
                    • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of AT&T Corp. Resolving Certain Informal Complaints and Requesting An Additional Extension of Time in Which to Convert Other Informal Complaints to Formal Complaints and Toll Limitations Period IS
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-822A1.html
                    • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of AT&T Corp. Resolving Certain Informal Complaints and Requesting An Additional Extension of Time in Which to Convert Informal Complaint Against CTC Telcom to Formal Complaint and Toll Limitations
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-930A1.html
                    • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 9. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Partial Withdrawal of Informal Complaint and the Petition for Additional Extension of Time filed by Indiana Paging Network, Inc. ARE GRANTED. 10. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-960A1.html
                    • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of AT&T Corp. Requesting Additional Extension of Time in Which to Convert Informal Complaint Against CTC Telcom to Formal Complaint and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-314A1.html
                    • EUCL charges were imposed. 49. Second, Complainants assert that, irrespective of the accrual date of their causes of action, the statute of limitations should be tolled on equitable and administrative grounds, based on the filing of a petition for declaratory ruling by a payphone trade association (APCC) and the voluminous number of informal complaints. Complainants seek a waiver, under Section 1.3 of our Rules, of the application of Section 415(b) of the Act, which provides a party with two years from the date the cause of action accrues to file a complaint.142 Based on Commission and court precedent, as well as the facts of this case, as discussed below, we decline to extend the recovery period for which Complainants may collect
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-1083A1.html
                    • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of MCI WORLDCOM Network Services, Inc. Requesting Waiver of Section 1.718 of the Commission's Rules and Further Extension of Time In Which to Convert Its Informal Complaint to a
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-1132A1.html
                    • circumstances of this proceeding require that any additional pleadings, other than those described herein, must be served and filed prior to the initial status conference. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. 1.726 (replies), 1.729 (discovery). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), 208, and 255 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), 208, 255, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Unopposed Motion of Complainant for Limited Modification of the Procedural Schedule IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Colleen K. Heitkamp Chief, Telecommunications Consumers Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 1 See O'Day v. Audiovox Communications Corporation and
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-1134A1.html
                    • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-1174A1.html
                    • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of MCI WORLDCOM Network Services, Inc. Requesting Waiver of Section 1.718 of the Commission's Rules and Further Extension of Time In Which to Convert Its Informal Complaint to a
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-1187A1.html
                    • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-1261A1.html
                    • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties, and of this Commission, until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-160A1.html
                    • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-170A1.html
                    • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of Complainants For Extension of Time In Which To Convert Informal Complaints To Formal Complaint and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i),
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-1723A1.html
                    • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-1740A1.html
                    • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-1750A1.html
                    • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-1751A1.html
                    • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties, and of this Commission, until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-1811A1.html
                    • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-1900A1.html
                    • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 5. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that Notesan's Request for Waiver of Commission Rule 1.718(a) IS GRANTED. 6. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadline that would otherwise apply under section 1.718 of the
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-1975A1.html
                    • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-1976A1.html
                    • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-2000A1.html
                    • Because this extension will facilitate the possible settlement of these numerous claims and allow the parties to await the Court's review of the Liability Order, we are satisfied that our action today serves the public interest. 3. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), 208, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, and the authority delegated by sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111 and 0.311, that section 1.718(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.718(a), IS HEREBY WAIVED, with regard to the IPP EUCL informal complaints described herein and the deadline for the conversion and filing of these informal complaints
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-207A1.html
                    • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of MCI WORLDCOM Network Services, Inc. Requesting Waiver of Section 1.718 of the Commission's Rules and an Extension of Time In Which to Convert Its Informal Complaint to a
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-2110A1.html
                    • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-2180A1.html
                    • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-22A1.html
                    • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of MCI WORLDCOM Network Services, Inc. Requesting Waiver of Section 1.718 of the Commission's Rules and an Extension of Time In Which to Convert Its Informal Complaint to a
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-2377A1.html
                    • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-2378A1.html
                    • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-2617A1.html
                    • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-2618A1.html
                    • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-2736A1.html
                    • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-2880A1.html
                    • of disputes, and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-2881A1.html
                    • of disputes, and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-3022A1.html
                    • and Commission staff on Tuesday, October 14, 2003 at 11:00. Counsel for Complainants will establish a telephone bridge for this call, and inform the Defendant and Commission staff of the call-in information. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-3222A1.html
                    • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-3223A1.html
                    • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-351A1.html
                    • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that Notesan's Request for Waiver of Commission Rule 1.718(a) IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section 1.718 of the
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-358A1.html
                    • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Third Consent Motion of Complainant For Extension of Time In Which To Convert Informal Complaint To Formal Complaint and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-3595A1.html
                    • with sufficient time to devote their resources to reaching a settlement within the time estimated by the parties, yet establishes a reasonable deadline in the event that such an agreement proves unobtainable. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-371A1.html
                    • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of MCI WORLDCOM Network Services, Inc. Requesting Waiver of Section 1.718 of the Commission's Rules and an Extension of Time In Which to Convert Its Informal Complaint to a
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-3849A1.html
                    • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-3850A1.html
                    • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-406A1.html
                    • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-4092A1.html
                    • addition, the public interest will be served by affording KIS sufficient time to construct a formal complaint that complies with the Commission's rigorous rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.720-1.736, should such a complaint be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the requests for extension ARE GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-4110A1.html
                    • report on or before February 20, 2004. This report shall be addressed to: Suzanne Perrin Room CY-B526 Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau Federal Communication Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 5. This order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Radhika V. Karmarkar Deputy Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 1 47 C.F.R. 1.718. 2 See Letter from Warren Firschein, Attorney, Market Disputes Resolution Division, Enforcement Bureau, FCC,
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-449A1.html
                    • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that Qwest Corporation's request for waiver of Rule 1.718 and for extension of time IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934,
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-478A1.html
                    • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of MCI WORLDCOM Network Services, Inc. Requesting Waiver of Section 1.718 of the Commission's Rules and Further Extension of Time In Which to Convert Its Informal Complaint to a
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-569A1.html
                    • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Fourth Consent Motion of Complainant For Extension of Time In Which To Convert Informal Complaint To Formal Complaint and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-607A1.html
                    • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-67A1.html
                    • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that Qwest Corporation's Request for waiver of Rule 1.718 and for Extension of Time IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934,
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-75A1.html
                    • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-767A1.html
                    • circumstances of this proceeding require that any additional pleadings, other than those described herein, must be served and filed prior to the initial status conference. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. 1.726 (replies), 1.729 (discovery). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), 208, and 255 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), 208, 255, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Unopposed Motion of Defendants to Modify Procedural Schedule IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Colleen K. Heitkamp Chief, Telecommunications Consumers Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 1 See O'Day v. Audiovox Communications Corporation and Verizon Wireless, Notice
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-76A1.html
                    • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-77A1.html
                    • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-787A1.html
                    • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of MCI WORLDCOM Network Services, Inc. Requesting Waiver of Section 1.718 of the Commission's Rules and Further Extension of Time In Which to Convert Its Informal Complaint to a
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-78A1.html
                    • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-827A1.html
                    • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Fifth Consent Motion of Complainant For Extension of Time In Which To Convert Informal Complaint To Formal Complaint and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-836A1.html
                    • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of MCI WORLDCOM Network Services, Inc. Requesting Waiver of Section 1.718 of the Commission's Rules and Further Extension of Time In Which to Convert Its Informal Complaint to a
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-861A1.html
                    • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-875A1.html
                    • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-1043A1.html
                    • the public interest by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 3. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 4. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section 1.718 of our rules, 47
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-1099A1.html
                    • report on or before June 18, 2004. This report shall be addressed to: Suzanne Perrin Room CY-B526 Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau Federal Communication Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 5. This order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Radhika V. Karmarkar Deputy Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 1 47 C.F.R. 1.718. 2 See Judware v. Verizon, Order, DA 04-577, 2004 WL 369089 (F.C.C.) (February 27,
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-1450A1.html
                    • informal complaints into formal complaints.10 Because this extension will facilitate the possible settlement of these numerous claims, particularly in light of the Court's recent opinion, we are satisfied that our action today serves the public interest. 3. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), 208, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, and the authority delegated by sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111 and 0.311, that section 1.718(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.718(a), IS HEREBY WAIVED, with regard to the IPP EUCL informal complaints described herein and the deadline for the conversion and filing of these informal complaints
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-14A1.html
                    • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-1749A1.html
                    • public interest, and will postpone the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the request for extension of time to file complainants' formal complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadlines that otherwise would apply under section 1.718 of the Commission's rules,
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-1809A1.html
                    • motion requesting such action within sixty (60) days after notice of termination or expiration of the automatic stay in Cable & Wireless' bankruptcy proceedings, rather than filing an entirely new formal complaint.12 6. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3, 1.716-18, and 1.720-1.736 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.716-18, 1.720-36, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that Qwest's and U.S. South's Joint Request for Dismissal With Prejudice as to U.S. South IS GRANTED. 7. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-1874A1.html
                    • report on or before Auguest 20, 2004. This report shall be addressed to: Suzanne Perrin Room CY-B526 Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau Federal Communication Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 5. This order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Radhika V. Karmarkar Deputy Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 1 47 C.F.R. 1.718. 2 See Judware v. Verizon, Order, DA 04-1099, 2004 WL 877367 (F.C.C.) (April 26,
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-2000A1.html
                    • public interest, and will postpone the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the request for extension of time to file complainants' formal complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadlines that otherwise would apply under section 1.718 of the Commission's rules,
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-2704A1.html
                    • James A. Dailey Director, Office of Homeland Security Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 1 47 C.F.R. 11.51(j). 2 See id. 3 Letter from Matthew H. McCormick, Counsel for Hull Broadcasting, Inc. (filed May 4, 2004). 4 Email from Matthew H. McCormick, Counsel for Hull Broadcasting, Inc. (Aug. 3, 2004) (providing supplemental information in response to Commission staff inquiry). 5 See 47 C.F.R. 1.3 (``Any provision of the rules may be waived by the Commission on its own motion or by petition if good cause therefore is shown."). See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (finding that a waiver is appropriate only if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule and such deviation will serve the
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-2837A1.html
                    • report on or before October 22, 2004. This report shall be addressed to: Suzanne Perrin Room CY-B526 Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 5. This order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Radhika V. Karmarkar Deputy Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 1 47 C.F.R. 1.718. 2 See Judware v. Verizon, Order, DA 04-1874, 2004 WL 1432325 (F.C.C.) (June 24,
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-2972A1.html
                    • settlement of this dispute and by postponing the need for litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3, 1.716- 18, and 1.720-1.736 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.716-18, 1.720-36, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request to Convert IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j),
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-3087A1.html
                    • the public interest by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 5. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.722 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.722, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that Innovative's Petition for waiver and extension of time IS GRANTED. 6. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadline for AT&T to file a supplemental complaint for damages
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-3167A1.html
                    • filing deadline for the conversion of these EUCL informal complaints into formal complaints. Because this extension will facilitate the possible settlement of these numerous claims, we are satisfied that our action today serves the public interest. 3. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), 208, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, and the authority delegated by sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111 and 0.311, that section 1.718(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.718(a), IS HEREBY WAIVED, with regard to the IPP EUCL informal complaints described herein and the deadline for the conversion and filing of these informal complaints
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-3265A1.html
                    • the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. We are not satisfied, however, that the additional safeguard requested by ACS is necessary and/or serves the public interest. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3, 1.716- 18, and 1.720-1.736 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.716-18, 1.720-36, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Joint Motion to Dismiss Claims Against ACS of Fairbanks, Inc. and ACS of Alaska, Inc.; Request to Convert Claims Against ACS of Anchorage, Inc. to Claims in an
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-3394A1.html
                    • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of MCI IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section 1.718 of our rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.718,
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-343A1.html
                    • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section 1.718 of our rules, 47
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-3467A1.html
                    • report on or before December 17, 2004. This report shall be addressed to: Suzanne Perrin Room 4-B522 Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 5. This Order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Radhika V. Karmarkar Deputy Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 1 47 C.F.R. 1.718. 2 See Judware v. Verizon, Order, DA 04-2837, 2004 WL 1944886 (F.C.C.) (September 1,
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-3569A1.html
                    • sections 0.111, 0.311, and 1.727 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, and 1.727, Verizon's Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Defer, is GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. 29. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3, 1.716-1.718, and 1.720-1.736 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.716-1.718, and 1.720-36, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111 and 0.311, Broadview's formal complaint of December 30, 2003 SHALL BE CONVERTED into an informal complaint with a designated filing date of December 30, 2003, and that the formal complaint and
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-3871A1.html
                    • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of MCI IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section 1.718 of our rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.718,
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-3978A1.html
                    • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that Verizon's request for extension IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.718,
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-4022A1.html
                    • order, a notice of intent to convert its informal complaint into a formal complaint. Any informal complainant who does not submit such notice shall waive its right to convert its informal complaint into a formal complaint. 4. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), 208, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, and the authority delegated by sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111 and 0.311, that section 1.718(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.718(a), IS HEREBY WAIVED, with regard to the IPP EUCL informal complaints described herein and the deadline for the conversion and filing of these informal complaints
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-577A1.html
                    • report on or before April 16, 2004. This report shall be addressed to: Suzanne Perrin Room CY-B526 Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau Federal Communication Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 5. This order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Radhika V. Karmarkar Deputy Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 1 47 C.F.R. 1.718. 2 See Judware v. Verizon, Order, DA 03-4110, 2003 WL 23095472 (F.C.C.) (December 31,
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-682A1.html
                    • public interest, and will postpone the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section 1.718 of our rules, 47
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-753A1.html
                    • the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Joint Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice the Complaint against the Remaining Defendants IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3, 1.716-18, and 1.720-1.736 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.716-18, 1.720-36, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Complainants' formal complaint is converted to an informal complaint, and that the formal complaint and answer filed in the above- captioned proceeding satisfy sections 1.716-17 of the Commission's rules,
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-2819A1.html
                    • Inc., ) File No. EB-03-MD-011 Jaroth, Inc. d/b/a Pacific ) Telemanagement ) Services, and ) Intera Communications Corp., ) ) Complainants, ) ) v. ) Network IP, LLC, and ) Network Enhanced Telecom, LLP, ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER Adopted: October 26, 2005Released: October 27, 2005 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Order, pursuant to sections 1.3 and 1.727 of the Commission's rules,1 we grant in substantial part a motion2 filed by Complainants (collectively, ``APCC'') for waiver of the six-month filing deadline set forth in section 1.718 of the Commission's rules.3 For statute of limitations purposes, rule 1.718 allows the filing date of a formal complaint to ``relate back'' to the filing date of a prior informal
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-328A1.html
                    • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of MCI, Inc. IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section 1.718 of our rules, 47 C.F.R.
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-484A1.html
                    • report on or before April 15, 2005. This report shall be addressed to: Suzanne Perrin Room 4-B522 Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 5. This Order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Lisa B. Griffin, Deputy Division Chief Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 1 47 C.F.R. 1.718. 2 See Judware v. Verizon, Order, DA 05-6, 2005 WL 22880 (F.C.C.) (January
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-48A1.html
                    • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of MCI IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section 1.718 of our rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.718,
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-4A1.html
                    • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that OCI's request for extension IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.718,
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-668A1.html
                    • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of MCI, Inc. IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section 1.718 of our rules, 47 C.F.R.
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-674A1.html
                    • service by hand delivery and permit complainants to serve defendants by overnight mail. 24. All other rules relating to formal complaints apply in their entirety, including sections 1.725- 1.736 of the Commission's rules.31 IV. ORDERING CLAUSES 25. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), 208, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, and the authority delegated by sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111 and 0.311, that on or before April 22, 2005, informal complainants submit notice of intent to proceed as specified above. Any informal complainant that does not provide such notice waives its right to convert its informal complaint
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-6A1.html
                    • report on or before February 18, 2005. This report shall be addressed to: Suzanne Perrin Room 4-B522 Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 5. This Order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Lisa B. Griffin, Deputy Division Chief Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 1 47 C.F.R. 1.718. 2 See Judware v. Verizon, Order, DA 04-3467, 2004 WL 2434283 (F.C.C.) (November
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-1328A1.html
                    • be imposed or should be reduced shall include a detailed factual statement and such documentation and affidavits as may be pertinent." Section 1.80(f)(3) of the Rules. 47 C.F.R. S 1.80(f)(3). Public Notice: Low Power FM Filing Window Deadline Extended, 15 FCC Rcd 9533 (2000). 47 C.F.R. S 73.870(b). Waivers will only be granted for "good cause shown." 47 C.F.R. S 1.3. We note that 916 Radio, by continuing to operate an unlicensed station, after receiving warnings from the San Francisco Office, was not in compliance with the Commission's Rules when it filed the March 17, 2005 waiver request and application. See 47 C.F.R. S 73.854 ("No application for an LPFM station may be granted unless the applicant certifies, under penalty of
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-166A1.html
                    • this vein, we note that so-called "live" programming is not literally live - viewers at home do not see an event at the very time that it is actually occurring. Rather, there is a natural delay caused by the time that it takes a signal to reach viewers. The record shows that digital signals, for example, may take up to 1.3 to 3.3 seconds to reach viewers over-the-air. And, if viewers are receiving such signals through a cable operator or satellite provider, there may be an additional delay of up to 3 seconds. Finally, if a viewer has a digital video recorder, there is another additional delay of approximately another half-second. Thus, using a conservative estimate, a viewer may be watching
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-91A1.html
                    • that the person has committed some form of fraud related to the E-Rate program. The Second Report and Order offers only one example of such "extraordinary circumstances" -- reversal of the conviction or judgment upon which the debarment was based. 19. Those who seek to avoid debarment by requesting waiver of the rule must meet a similarly high burden. Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules governs petitions for waiver generally, and provides that a waiver may be granted upon "good cause shown." Because Commission rules are presumed valid, the petitioner bears a heavy burden. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule "only if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule and such a deviation will serve
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-2150A1.html
                    • P 19; NPTC Nov. 23, 2005 Letter. See Implementation of Section 703(e) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996; Amendment of the Commission's Rules and Policies Governing Pole Attachments, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 6777, 6788-89, P 19 (1998) (rejecting pole owners' proposal to impose a statute of limitations on pole attachment complaints) (subsequent history omitted). See 47 C.F.R. S 1.3 ("Any provision of the rules may be waived by the Commission on its own motion or on petition if good cause therefor is shown."). Reply at 19-20; Reply, Declaration of Loren Salsgiver, Chief Executive Officer of Salsgiver Telecom, at 2, PP 3, 4. See, e.g., Implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Amendment of Rules Governing Procedures to be Followed
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-06-126A1.html
                    • of time is necessary to protect the integrity of the program, and to guard against the possibility of additional waste, fraud, and abuse. Accordingly, we debar NextiraOne. 15. We also deny NextiraOne's request to waive the debarment rule in this case. Those who seek to avoid debarment by requesting waiver of the rule must meet a similarly high burden. Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules governs petitions for waiver generally, and provides that a waiver may be granted upon "good cause shown." Because Commission rules are presumed valid, the petitioner bears a heavy burden. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule "only if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule and such a deviation will serve
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-73A1.html
                    • contributions. In light of the seriousness, duration and scope of Carrera's violations, we conclude that the forfeiture proposed in the Carrera NAL and revised as set forth above to $345,900 is warranted. V. ORDERING CLAUSES 20. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 303(r) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. SS 154(i), 154(j), and 303(r), and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S 1.3, Carrera's Petition for Waiver is GRANTED. 21. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT, pursuant to section 503(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 503(b), and section 1.80 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S 1.80, Carrera IS LIABLE FOR A MONETARY FORFEITURE in the amount of $345,900 for willfully and repeatedly violating the
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1685A1.html
                    • the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau initiated an investigation into whether RangeVideo is marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices, specifically, wireless video transmitters. At the time of that letter, we observed on your website, www.rangevideo.com, your marketing of the following radio frequency devices: 1. 900MHz 100mW audio/video transmitter 2. 900MHz 500mW audio/video transmitter 3. 1.3GHz 300mW audio/video transmitter 4. 2.4GHz 200mW audio/video transmitter 5. 2.4GHz 500mW audio/video transmitter 6. 2.4GHz 1000mW audio/video transmitter 7. 2.4GHz 1000mW cased audio/video transmitter. In your response to the LOI dated June 30, 2008, you state that you do not manufacture these transmitter devices. You admit that you first imported the devices on August 2, 2006, that you continue to
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/FCC-08-159A1.html
                    • the potential customer base, and the "self-certification" as common carriers - were suggested by the Complaint itself, and are not complex. Thus, Verizon has had an adequate opportunity to respond. Accordingly, to the extent that our rules require those facts to be alleged more clearly in the Complaint, we waive those rules for good cause shown. See 47 C.F.R. S:S: 1.3, 1.721, 1.726. See NARUC I, 525 F.2d at 608. As mentioned previously, "[o]ne may be a common carrier though the nature of the service rendered is sufficiently specialized as to be of possible use to only a fraction of the total population." NARUC I, 525 F.2d at 608. This undermines the probative value of the fact that the Comcast and
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-2506A1.html
                    • of any of the video transmitters, and that the devices are imported from import/export companies in China and Hong Kong. You indicate that you imported the specified devices between December 19, 2007 and June 8, 2008, and imported a total of 124 units. Additionally, you indicate that the frequency bands on which the 1.2 GHz transmitters operate are 0.9 GHz/1.2 GHz/1.3 GHz and that the frequency bands on which the 2.4 GHz transmitters operate are 2.2 GHz/2.3 GHz/2.4 GHz. Your response also states that "[you] have immediately ceased all sales of the products in question. The website has been dismantled and the domain name will be relinquished." You admit that the devices have not been certified in accordance with the Rules,
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2012/DA-12-789A1.html
                    • the president of Mount Rushmore. After being informed that the Mount Rushmore president was in the area, the agent left his business card with an employee who agreed to have the president contact the agent, however, the agent never heard from the president. 4. Also on June 1, 2011, the Denver agent inspected the Station KZMX-FM transmitter facility located approximately 1.3 miles from the Stations' main studio location. The agent observed that Station KZMX-FM was operating using a 4-bay, circularly polarized FM antenna, while a 4-bay horizontal FM antenna was on the ground near the KZMX-FM tower. According to the Station KZMX-FM license, it is authorized to operate using horizontal polarization only. 5. In the morning of June 2, 2011, the
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/fcc00138.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/fcc00138.txt
                    • to investigate whether further enforcement action is warranted against Defendants for apparent knowing or repeated violations of Commission rules in relation to the facts raised in these complaint proceedings. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 201(b), 203(c), and 208 of the Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 154(j), 201(b), 203(c), 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.106 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 1.106, that the Application for Review of the Bell Atlantic Order filed by Frontier Communications Services, Inc. IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 201(b), 203(c), and 208 of the Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 154(j), 201(b), 203(c), 208, and
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-1073A1.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-1073A1.pdf
                    • we invited petitions for rule making to reserve vacant FM allotments for NCE use pursuant to the NCE Second Report and Order. In response to the Public Notice, we received 129 petitions for the reservation of 91 allotments. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.7002(b). See Michael S. Rice, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 16 FCC Rcd 18394 (2001) See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 06-1073 Federal Communications Commission DA 06-1073 m � � � � � � � F � � T�Ӑ � ^� � ^� �
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4510A1.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4510A1.pdf
                    • 303 (1999); 47 C.F.R � 1.80(b)(4), note to paragraph (b)(4), Section I. A broadcast station requires an authorization from the Commission to operate. See 47 U.S.C. � 301. 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(2)(D); see also Forfeiture Policy Statement, 12 FCC Rcd at 17100-01; 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(4); 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(4), note to paragraph (b)(4), Section II. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; Northeast Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (``[W]aiver is appropriate . . . if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule and such deviation will serve the public interest''); WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969). See also 1998 Biennial Regulatory Review -- Streamlining of Mass Media Applications,
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-27A1.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-27A1.pdf
                    • of a first local broadcast service to Nunn, Colorado, under Priority 3 of the FM allotment priorities. A staff engineering analysis indicates that Channel 286A can be substituted for vacant Channel 247A at Wheatland, Wyoming, consistent with the technical engineering requirements of the Commission's Rules, at coordinates of 42-04-28 NL and 104-56-51 WL, with a site restriction of 2.2 kilometers (1.3 miles) northeast of Wheatland. 3. Accordingly, we seek comment on the proposed amendment of the FM Table of Allotments, Section 73.202(b), as follows: Community Present Proposed Wheatland, Wyoming 247A 286A 4. The Commission's authority to institute rule making proceedings, showings required, cut-off procedures, and filing requirements are contained in the attached Appendix and are incorporated by reference herein. In particular,
                  • http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-448A2.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-448A2.pdf
                    • endobj 382 0 obj[383 0 R] endobj 383 0 obj<> endobj 384 0 obj<> endobj 385 0 obj<> endobj 386 0 obj<>stream xmlns:pdf='http://ns.adobe.com/pdf/1.3/' pdf:Producer='HyperGEAR PDF Make Library'> HyperGEAR,Inc.< /rdf:li> endstream endobj 387 0 obj<> endobj 388 0 obj<> endobj 389 0 obj<
                    • http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-12-28A1.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-12-28A1.pdf
                      • the LPFM stations at risk of displacement, the Bureau had identified alternate channels that would require waivers of the second-adjacent channel spacing requirements. To avoid ``potential harm to this small but not insignificant number of LPFM stations,'' the Commission adopted the waiver processing policy. In adopting this policy, the Commission relied on the general waiver provisions set forth in Section 1.3 of the rules. Section 3(b)(2)(A) of the LCRA explicitly grants the Commission the authority to waive the second-adjacent channel spacing requirements. Section 3(b)(2)(A) permits waivers where an LPFM station establishes, ``using methods of predicting interference taking into account all relevant factors, including terrain-sensitive propagation models,'' that its proposed operations ``will not result in interference to any authorized radio service.'' We
                    • http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-99-55A1.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-99-55A1.pdf
                      • applicants, or designation of the applications for comparative hearing to eliminate the mutual exclusivity. The prospect of expending significant resources to prosecute an application without any certainty of grant may substantially deter applicants from seeking to improve service. Therefore, we proposed in the Notice to extend first come/first served processing to AM, NCE FM and FM translator minor change applications. 1.3 Our current rules also treat proposed facilities changes in the different radio services inconsistently. In the commercial FM service, only proposed changes in community of license and changes to a non-adjacent or non-intermediate frequency channel are defined as major changes. In the other radio services, however, the following changes are so defined: (1) for AM stations, most proposed increases in
                    • http://transition.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Databases/documents_collection/AttachC-04-18-1997.html
                      • allotment will have sixty (60) days from the date the public notice of selection to file an application for construction permit. The [3]Memorandum Opinion and Order that was released simultaneously with the revised expanded band allotment plan extended the filing period to ninety days. A waiver of this requirement would require a traditional "good cause" showing. See 47 C.F.R. Section 1.3. 15. Must I comply with the publication requirements of 47 C.F.R. Section 73.3580? Yes. Applicants must comply with all "new station" publication requirements. 16. I am currently at the local radio ownership cap. Will I need to divest or obtain a waiver prior to obtaining an expanded band station license? No. Expanded band stations are not counted for multiple ownership
                    • http://transition.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files09/CREPOR09.pdf
                      • 91.7 $30,712 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $1,364 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 5,665,106 0.0 0.0 6.6 0.0 93.4 Netherlands $32,208,619 0.0 0.1 0.8 0.0 99.1 $2,223,119 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $14,258,219 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 598,578,371 0.0 0.1 1.5 0.0 98.4 Norway $14,375,622 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 98.7 $979,485 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $11,905,368 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 245,541,162 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 98.6 Portugal $8,661,424 0.0 0.1 3.0 0.0 96.9 $676,929 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $6,455,101 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 179,171,913 0.0 0.1 7.9 0.0 92.0 Spain $39,578,183 0.0 0.2 1.4 0.1 98.3 $2,623,640 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $76,596,771 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 636,657,859 0.0 0.1 2.9 0.0 96.9 Sweden $18,295,719 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 99.0 $1,032,549 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0
                    • http://transition.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files10/CREPOR10.pdf
                      • 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $1,891,134 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 99.8 396,761,258 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.7 99.2 Italy $32,470,005 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.3 96.7 $8,131,637 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $39,099,750 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 818,950,600 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.3 94.7 Liechtenstein $2,064,776 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.4 99.3 $772 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $7,471 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 98.2 7,661,264 0.0 0.0 1.1 1.3 97.5 Luxembourg $1,510,384 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 99.1 $366,390 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $6,104,760 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 57,007,671 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 99.1 Malta $830,676 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.3 97.7 $37,334 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $1,60316.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 83.1 6,915,471 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.5 92.5 Netherlands $23,424,030 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 99.6 $1,594,086 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $12,116,320
                    • http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/materials/already-released/survivor090002.pdf
                      • viewing, the figures are percentages of total viewing and sum to 100 percent. 1990-91 2000-01 Broadcast- Only Households Cable Households Difference Broadcast- Only Households Cable HouseholdsDifference Total TV Viewing 41.6 54.7 13.1 45.3 63.0 17.7 Total Broadcast 41.6 31.9 -9.7 45.3 26.8 -18.5 Network Affiliates* 29.4 24 -5.4 29.4 20.8 -8.6 Independents** 10.3 8.1 -2.2 12.9 4.7 -8.2 PBS 1.9 1.3 -0.6 3.0 1.3 -1.7 Total Cable -- 22.8 -- 36.2 Ad-Supported -- 18.2 -- 29.8 Premium Pay -- 4.6 -- 4.0 All Other Cable*** -- -- -- 2.4 Source: Cabletelevision Advertising Bureau,Cable TV Facts 1992 ed., p. 6 and 2002 ed. p. 41. Notes: * Network affiliates ABC/CBS/NBC in 1990-91 and ABC/CBS/NBC/FOX in 2000-01. ** WB/UPN/PAX affiliates and independents. ***This
                    • http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-b.pdf
                      • 2.9 1.5 Adult Contemp./New Rock 0.6 1.1 0.3 1.1 1.5 0.6 AC/Soft Adult Contemp. 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 Album Oriented Rock (AOR) 5.3 6.0 0.7 4.5 4.9 2.4 AOR/Adult Contemp. 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 AOR/Classic Rock 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Album Oriented Rock/New Rock 3.0 3.7 0.5 3.1 3.3 1.9 Album Oriented Rock/Progressive 1.0 1.3 0.1 1.8 1.6 0.6 Black 7.5 1.7 32.5 1.6 4.0 1.6 Black/Adult Contemp. 3.2 0.8 18.3 1.4 4.6 1.7 Black/Gospel 1.2 0.0 1.8 0.1 0.0 0.0 Black/Oldies 1.0 0.1 2.4 0.3 0.5 0.0 Black/Talk 0.2 0.0 1.4 0.3 0.4 0.0 Big Band/Nostalgia 4.7 4.2 0.5 4.2 4.1 1.2 Big Band/Nostalgia/Religious 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Country 13.0 11.9 1.5
                    • http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-c.pdf
                      • 2.9 1.5 Adult Contemp./New Rock 0.6 1.1 0.3 1.1 1.5 0.6 AC/Soft Adult Contemp. 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 Album Oriented Rock (AOR) 5.3 6.0 0.7 4.5 4.9 2.4 AOR/Adult Contemp. 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 AOR/Classic Rock 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Album Oriented Rock/New Rock 3.0 3.7 0.5 3.1 3.3 1.9 Album Oriented Rock/Progressive 1.0 1.3 0.1 1.8 1.6 0.6 Black 7.5 1.7 32.5 1.6 4.0 1.6 Black/Adult Contemp. 3.2 0.8 18.3 1.4 4.6 1.7 Black/Gospel 1.2 0.0 1.8 0.1 0.0 0.0 Black/Oldies 1.0 0.1 2.4 0.3 0.5 0.0 Black/Talk 0.2 0.0 1.4 0.3 0.4 0.0 Big Band/Nostalgia 4.7 4.2 0.5 4.2 4.1 1.2 Big Band/Nostalgia/Religious 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Country 13.0 11.9 1.5
                    • http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/workshop-110209/wildman.pdf
                      • StnsOther Radio Stations City gov't 24.0 20.6 16.4 19.4 19.4 County gov't 2.8 2.5 3.9 5.4 5.4 Reg. gov't 0.8 0.1 0.3 1.0 0.5 Education 7.8 10.7 4.5 5.4 4.3 Crime/Courts 23.2 8.2 31.1 28.1 26.3 Accidents/Disasters 5.6 1.0 11.6 9.7 11.8 Human/Community interest 16.3 41.3 12.7 14.0 11.3 Business/Economy 17.0 14.4 16.7 15.7 17.2 All else 2.6 1.1 2.7 1.3 3.8 Total 100 100 100 100 100 12 News Outlets vsOutlets with Local News TV Stations News Outlets vsOutlets with Local News Radio News Outlets vsOutlets with Local News Daily Newspapers News Outlets vsOutlets with Local News Weekly Newspapers News Outlets vsOutlets with Local News Citizen web news and blogsites
                    • http://transition.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/speeches/Hinshaw%20-%20PSAP%20Brfg%20-%20FCC%20Trng%206-25-09.pdf
                      • support, funding stream, legislation, national organizations (National Emergency Number Association) 9 1 1 In Disaster Operations �All 911 calls are routed to the nearest 911 Call Center (Public Safety Answer Point) �Accurate call back number (ANI) and location information (ALI) are provided to 911 call takers with all Wireline calls �During 2005 AT&T California processed: �15.4 Million 911 calls �Average 1.3 Million 911 calls per month 9 1 1 In Disaster Operations �911 Network �SS7 trunking, `Digital ALI'Network, CAMA Trunks, 911 Selective Routers, etc �911 Database �20 Million ALI records within the AT&T footprint �Fully redundant system and network configuration �Developed and maintained in partnership with County Coordinators, ILECs and CLECs �AT&T Ca. 911 Database accuracy exceeds 99.89%! 9 1 1
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/00a/releases/da011161.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/00a/releases/da011161.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/00a/releases/da011161.txt
                      • �� 6-10. Zimsky, 9 FCC Rcd. 3239. Id., at 3241, � 23; Knight, 982 F.3d at 1581 (citing Sprague, 307 U.S. at 166-67; Alyeska Pipeline Serv. Co. v. Wilderness Soc'y., 421 U.S. at 257-8; Boeing, 444 U.S. at 478) (emphasis added). Zimsky, 9 FCC Rcd. 3239; Common Fund Order, 15 FCC Rcd. at 20437, � 10. Id. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules provides the Commission with the authority to grant waivers ``if good cause therefor is shown.''); 47 C.F.R. � 1.925 (``The Commission may grant a waiver request if: (i) the underlying purpose of the rule(s) would not be served or would be frustrated by application to the instant case, and that a grant of the
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/02/releases/fcc97390.pdf
                      • ready and able to provide IVDS service. 24 Implementation of Section 309(j) of the Communications Act--Competitive Bidding, Second Report and 25 Order, PP Docket No. 93-253, 9 FCC Rcd 2348, 2382-84 (1994). Id. at 2381. 26 Id.; see also Interactive Video and Data Service (IVDS) Licenses--Requests to Extend Payment Deadline, 10 27 FCC Rcd 4520 (1995). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (holding that 28 grant of a waiver in the absence of special circumstances and good cause is improper). See 47 C.F.R. �� 95.816(d)(1)-(2) and 1.2110(e) (1996). 29 5 IV. DISCUSSION 6. After carefully reviewing the record, we find no justification for overturning the Bureau's decision. In the Second
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/da981573.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/da981573.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/da981573.wp
                      • change its election once again. In support of its request, OnQue argues that it has negotiated a funding agreement for infrastructure costs that would permit it to build out all of its broadband PCS C and F block licenses. 3. Having granted the June 23, 1998 waiver request, we consider the August 4, 1998 letter a second 47 CFR � 1.3; WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972). 2 47 CFR � 0.331. 3 2 waiver request. A request for a waiver of Commission rules must "set forth the reasons in support thereof including a showing that unique circumstances are involved and that there is no reasonable alternative within existing rules." On
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/fc980002.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/fc980002.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/fc980002.wp
                      • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-2 Petitions for reconsideration have been filed and the deadline for filing replies to oppositions is January 14, 1998. 1 Second Report and Order at para. 70. 2 Id. at paras. 72-76. 3 Id. at para. 75. 4 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Section 1.3 provides that the Commission's rules may be "suspended, revoked, amended, o r 5 waived for good cause shown, in whole or in part, at any time by the Commission, subject to the provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act . . . ." The Commission may act on its own motion. Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/or_95301.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/or_95301.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/or_95301.wp
                      • applicants to keep and find sources of investment.125 Small Business PCS was even more adamant that any other alternative would result in further delay and no viable licenses for any small businesses.126 Although the majority of commenters favor our proposal, Minority Media et al. also suggests allowing any applicant who can demonstrate "good cause" to request a waiver under Sections 1.3 and 24.819(a) of our rules127 to be eligible for small business preferences and the bidding credit under our proposed rule.128 Under Minority Media et al.'s proposed alternative, any waiver requests by women and minorities would receive a "plus" factor since there is record evidence in this proceeding and in congressional legislation that establishes compelling governmental interests in diversity of ownership.129
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/10/releases/da981573.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/10/releases/da981573.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/10/releases/da981573.wp
                      • change its election once again. In support of its request, OnQue argues that it has negotiated a funding agreement for infrastructure costs that would permit it to build out all of its broadband PCS C and F block licenses. 3. Having granted the June 23, 1998 waiver request, we consider the August 4, 1998 letter a second 47 CFR � 1.3; WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972). 2 47 CFR � 0.331. 3 2 waiver request. A request for a waiver of Commission rules must "set forth the reasons in support thereof including a showing that unique circumstances are involved and that there is no reasonable alternative within existing rules." On
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/10/releases/fc980002.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/10/releases/fc980002.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/10/releases/fc980002.wp
                      • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-2 Petitions for reconsideration have been filed and the deadline for filing replies to oppositions is January 14, 1998. 1 Second Report and Order at para. 70. 2 Id. at paras. 72-76. 3 Id. at para. 75. 4 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Section 1.3 provides that the Commission's rules may be "suspended, revoked, amended, o r 5 waived for good cause shown, in whole or in part, at any time by the Commission, subject to the provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act . . . ." The Commission may act on its own motion. Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/da970548.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/da970548.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/da970548.wp
                      • would mitigate the need for the out-of-band emission limits adopted in the WCS Report and Order. In an effort to rapidly resolve these matters given the statutory deadline of April 15, 1997, for commencement of competitive bidding in the WCS auction, the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau is establishing an expedited pleading cycle. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.429 and 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (providing that Commission rules may be suspended, revoked, amended or waived for good cause shown). Parties should file oppositions to the petitions by Friday, March 21, 1997, and replies to oppositions by Tuesday, March 25, 1997, with the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 1919 M Street, N.W., Room 222, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, two copies should be hand delivered to:
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da991788.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da991788.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da991788.wp
                      • Martinez Estevez at 2. 4 Waiver Request at 3. 5 47 C.F.R. � 90.905. Under 47 C.F.R. � 90.907, winning bidders must make full payment of the balance of their 6 winning bids ten business days after issuance of the Public Notice announcing that the Commission is prepared to award the license. 47 C.F.R. � 1.2109(a). 7 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. At the time of High Tech's waiver request, an applicant seeking a waiver of section 90.905 was 8 required under 47 C.F.R. � 90.151 to show that unique circumstances were involved and that there was no reasonable alternative solution within the existing rules. Arctic Slope Telephone Association Cooperative, Inc., Order, 13 FCC Rcd. 24217, 24219 (CCB 1998)(citing 9 Northeast Cellular
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/da980307.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/da980307.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/da980307.wp
                      • de facto control of VTF, and has not been authorized by the Commonwealth of Virginia to expend funds in the LMDS auction. A request for a waiver of the Commission's rules must "set forth the reasons in support thereof including a showing that unique circumstances are involved and that there is no reasonable alternative within existing rules." 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972). On the basis of the record before us, we are not persuaded that VTF has presented unique circumstances sufficient to justify grant of its waiver request and exclude the identified revenues from its gross revenues calculation. With regard to VTF's first basis for seeking
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/da981920.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/da981920.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/da981920.wp
                      • 1; NTCA Comments at 3; RTG Comments at 1-2; RTFC Comments at 7; Venture 34 Comments at 1; USTA Reply Comments at 7. 5 Sections 101.23 and 101.1003(a)(2) of the Commission's Rules. Other petitioners did not cite to 27 either of these waiver rules, but based their waiver requests on factors similar to the criteria established in Sections 101.23 and 1.3 of the Commission's Rules. 28 6. In a Public Notice released on April 16, 1998, the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau ("Bureau") sought comment on a March 26, 1998 letter from the United States Telephone Association ("USTA") to Chairman Kennard urging the Commission to eliminate eligibility restrictions for reauctioned licenses and all ownership restrictions on previously auctioned licenses.29 The Bureau also sought
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/fc960311.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/fc960311.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/fc960311.wp
                      • license within their respective service areas, we consider whether LMDS will provide a unique and important new source of competition to incumbent cable and telephone companies. The record of this proceeding strongly supports the conclusion that LMDS is a potentially important source of competition to both LECs and cable operators. 28 GHz LMDS licenses will permit use of up to 1.3 GHz of spectrum by a single provider, and equipment is relatively close to marketability. While it is not possible to identify all potential uses of LMDS, licensees could use this unparalleled amount of spectrum to construct sophisticated networks that will incorporate aspects of many current telecommunications offerings. It also appears that LMDS is uniquely positioned to provide competitive telecommunications services
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/da982397.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/da982397.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/da982397.wp
                      • net high bid for the subject licenses, or $1,948.05. Pursuant to section 1.2104(g), this payment will be deducted from the upfront payment amount that Rush has on deposit with the Commission. If additional payment is 28 required following the reauction of the subject licenses, a second Order will assess such payment. III. ORDERING CLAUSES 8. Accordingly, pursuant to sections 0.331, 1.3 and 90.151 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.331, 1.3, 90.151, IT IS ORDERED, that the Waiver Request, filed on November 13, 1998, by Rush Network Corp., is DENIED. 9. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to 0.331 and 90.161 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.331, 90.161, that the FCC Form 601, File No. 0000002616, filed on November
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/da981796.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/da981796.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/da981796.wp
                      • in which case the applicant must indicate in 41 Exhibit E that it has filed a confidentiality request. Because the required information bears on applicants' qualifications, the FCC envisions that confidentiality requests will not be routinely granted. Waivers: Applicants requesting waiver of any rules must submit a statement of reasons sufficient to justify the waiver sought. See 47 CFR � 1.3. 42 AUCTION-SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FCC REMITTANCE ADVICE, FCC FORM 159 UPFRONT PAYMENTS The following information supplements the standard instructions for FCC Form 159, and is provided to help ensure correct completion of FCC Form 159 for upfront payments for VHF Public Coast Service auction (Auction No. 20). Applicants need to complete FCC Form 159 carefully, since: #Mistakes may affect their bidding
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/21/releases/da981879.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/21/releases/da981879.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/21/releases/da981879.wp
                      • Division), in which case the applicant must indicate in Exhibit E that it has filed a confidentiality request. Because the required information bears on applicants' qualifications, the FCC envisions that confidentiality requests will not be routinely granted. Waivers: Applicants requesting waiver of any rules must submit a statement of reasons sufficient to justify the waiver sought. See 47 CFR � 1.3. 48 AUCTION-SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FCC REMITTANCE ADVICE, FCC FORM 159 UPFRONT PAYMENTS The following information supplements the standard instructions for FCC Form 159, and is provided to help ensure correct completion of FCC Form 159 for upfront payments for Location and Monitoring Service (LMS) auction (Auction No. 21). Applicants need to complete FCC Form 159 carefully, since: #Mistakes may affect their
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/21/releases/lmsbp_f.pdf
                      • Division), in which case the applicant must indicate in Exhibit E that it has filed a confidentiality request. Because the required information bears on applicants' qualifications, the FCC envisions that confidentiality requests will not be routinely granted. Waivers: Applicants requesting waiver of any rules must submit a statement of reasons sufficient to justify the waiver sought. See 47 CFR � 1.3. INSERT 175 EXAMPLE, EXHIBIT EXAMPLE, 159, 159-C September 13, 1998 Exhibit A: Applicant Identity and Ownership Information John Buck (50%) and Jane Doe (50%) U.S. Citizen U.S. Citizen 123 Any Street 456 Some Road Anytown, USA 99999 Anytown, USA 99999 We hereby certify that we are a 50/50 partnership. There are no other partners. Exhibit B: Agreements with Other Parties/Joint
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/22/releases/da982604.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/22/releases/da982604.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/22/releases/da982604.wp
                      • in which case the applicant must indicate in Exhibit E that it has filed a confidentiality request. Because the required information bears on applicants' qualifications, the FCC envisions that confidentiality requests will not be routinely granted. 47 Waivers: Applicants requesting waiver of any rules must submit a statement of reasons sufficient to justify the waiver sought. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. 48 AUCTION-SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FCC REMITTANCE ADVICE, FCC FORM 159 UPFRONT PAYMENTS The following information supplements the standard instructions for FCC Form 159, and is provided to help ensure correct completion of FCC Form 159 for upfront payments for the C, D, E, and F Block Broadband PCS auction (Auction No. 22). Applicants need to complete FCC Form 159 carefully, since:
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/22/releases/da990302.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/22/releases/da990302.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/22/releases/da990302.wp
                      • Division), in which case the applicant must indicate in Exhibit E that it has filed a confidentiality request. Because the required information bears on applicants' qualifications, the FCC envisions that confidentiality requests will not be routinely granted. Waivers: Applicants requesting waiver of any rules must submit a statement of reasons sufficient to justify the waiver sought. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. 11 AUCTION-SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FCC REMITTANCE ADVICE, FCC FORM 159 UPFRONT PAYMENTS The following information supplements the standard instructions for FCC Form 159, and is provided to help ensure correct completion of FCC Form 159 for upfront payments for the C, D, E, and F Block Broadband PCS auction (Auction No. 22). Applicants need to complete FCC Form 159 carefully, since:
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/22/releases/pcsbipf.pdf
                      • and Industry Analysis Division. The applicant must also indicate in Exhibit E that it has filed a confidentiality request. Because the required information bears on applicants' qualifications, the FCC envisions that confidentiality requests will not be routinely granted. Waivers: Applicants requesting waiver of any rules must submit a statement of reasons sufficient to justify the waiver sought. See 47 C.F.R. �1.3. March 20, 1999 Exhibit A: Applicant Identity and Ownership Information John Buck (50%) and Jane Doe (50%) U.S. Citizen U.S. Citizen 123 Any Street 456 Some Road Anytown, USA 99999 Anytown, USA 99999 We hereby certify that we are a 50/50 partnership. There are no other partners. Exhibit B: Agreements with Other Parties/Joint Bidding Arrangements We wish to disclose that
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/23/releases/da000556.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/23/releases/da000556.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/23/releases/da000556.txt
                      • won at auction, then the Commission has stated that it will assess an initial default deposit of between three percent and twenty percent of the defaulted bid amount. Once the license(s) have been auctioned the total default payment will be calculated and the Commission will either assess the final balance or refund any amounts due to the defaulting bidder. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules permits the Commission to waive its rules if good cause is demonstrated. Section 1.925 of the Commission's Rules provides that a waiver of the Commission's rules will not be permitted except upon an affirmative showing that either: (a) the underlying purpose of the rule will not be served in a particular situation and that granting the
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/23/releases/da990266.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/23/releases/da990266.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/23/releases/da990266.wp
                      • in which case the applicant must indicate in Exhibit E that it has filed a confidentiality request. Because the required information bears on applicants' qualifications, the FCC envisions that confidentiality requests will 8 not be routinely granted. Waivers: Applicants requesting waiver of any rules must submit a statement of reasons sufficient to justify the waiver sought. See 47 CFR � 1.3. 9 AUCTION-SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FCC REMITTANCE ADVICE, FCC FORM 159 UPFRONT PAYMENTS The following information supplements the standard instructions for FCC Form 159, and is provided to help ensure correct completion of FCC Form 159 for upfront payments for Local Multipoint Distribution Service (LMDS) reauction (Auction No. 23). Applicants need to complete FCC Form 159 carefully, since: ! Mistakes may affect
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/24/releases/da990474.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/24/releases/da990474.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/24/releases/da990474.wp
                      • Division), in which case the applicant must indicate in Exhibit E that it has filed a confidentiality request. Because the required information bears on applicants' qualifications, the FCC envisions that confidentiality requests will not be routinely granted. Waivers: Applicants requesting waiver of any rules must submit a statement of reasons sufficient to justify the waiver sought. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. 42 ATTACHMENT D AUCTION-SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR FCC REMITTANCE ADVICE (FCC FORM 159) A. UPFRONT PAYMENTS The following information supplements the standard instructions for FCC Form 159, and is provided to help ensure correct completion of FCC Form 159 for upfront payments for Auction No. 24. Applicants need to complete FCC Form 159 carefully, since: !Mistakes may affect their bidding eligibility;
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/24/releases/pt1_pt90.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/24/releases/pt1_pt90.wp
                      • 14' 47.3"......85 degrees 45' 48.9" Providence-Pawtucket-Warwick, RI/MA....41 degrees 49' 32.4"......71 degrees 24' 39.2" Salt Lake City, Utah..................40 degrees 45' 22.8"......111 degrees 53' 28.8" Dayton, Ohio......................39 degrees 45' 32.2"......84 degrees 11' 42.8" Birmingham, Alabama................33 degrees 31' 01.4"......86 degrees 48' 36.0" Bridgeport, Connecticut...............41 degrees 10' 49.3"......73 degrees 11' 20.4" Norfolk-Portsmouth, Virginia............36 degrees 51' 10.5"......76 degrees 17' 19.8" Albany-Schenectady-Troy, New York......42 degrees 39' 01.3"......73 degrees 44' 59.4" Oklahoma City, Oklahoma..............35 degrees 28' 26.2"......97 degrees 31' 05.1" Nashville-Davidson, Tennessee...........36 degrees 09' 33.2"......86 degrees 46' 55.0" Toledo, Ohio/Michigan................41 degrees 39' 14.2"......83 degrees 32' 38.8" New Haven, Connecticut...............41 degrees 18' 25.3"......72 degrees 55' 28.4" Honolulu, Hawaii...................21 degrees 18' 48.6"......157 degrees 51' 50.1" Jacksonville, Florida..................30 degrees 19' 44.9"......81 degrees 39' 41.3" Akron, Ohio.......................41 degrees 05' 00.2"......81 degrees 30'
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/26/releases/d991591c.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/26/releases/d991591c.txt
                      • Division), in which case the applicant must indicate in Exhibit E that it has filed a confidentiality request. Because the required information bears on applicants' qualifications, the FCC envisions that confidentiality requests will not be routinely granted. Waivers: Applicants requesting waiver of any rules must submit a statement of reasons sufficient to justify the waiver sought. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. AUCTION-SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FCC REMITTANCE ADVICE, FCC FORM 159 UPFRONT PAYMENTS The following information supplements the standard instructions for FCC Form 159, and is provided to help ensure correct completion of the FCC Form 159 for upfront payments for Paging Upper Bands 929 and 931 MHz (Auction No. 26). Applicants need to complete FCC Form 159 carefully, since: Mistakes may affect
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/26/releases/pagebp_f.pdf
                      • Division), in which case the applicant must indicate in Exhibit E that it has filed a confidentiality request. Because the required information bears on applicants' qualifications, the FCC envisions that confidentiality requests will not be routinely granted. Waivers: Applicants requesting waiver of any rules must submit a statement of reasons sufficient to justify the waiver sought. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. 5. AUCTION-SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FCC REMITTANCE ADVICE, FCC FORM 159 UPFRONT PAYMENTS The following information supplements the standard instructions for FCC Form 159, and is provided to help ensure correct completion of the FCC Form 159 for upfront payments for the 929 and 931 MHz Paging Auction (Auction #26). Applicants need to complete FCC Form 159 carefully, since: � Mistakes may
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/30/releases/da000112.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/30/releases/da000112.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/30/releases/da000112.txt
                      • Division), in which case the applicant must indicate in Exhibit E that it has filed a confidentiality request. Because the required information bears on applicants' qualifications, the FCC envisions that confidentiality requests will not be routinely granted. Waivers: Applicants requesting waiver of any rules must submit a statement of reasons sufficient to justify the waiver sought. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. AUCTION-SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR FCC REMITTANCE ADVICE (FCC FORM 159) Upfront Payments The following information supplements the standard instructions for FCC Form 159, and is provided to help ensure correct completion of FCC Form 159 for upfront payments for Auction No. 30. Applicants need to complete FCC Form 159 carefully, since: Mistakes may affect their bidding eligibility; and Lack of consistency
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/31/releases/da000292.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/31/releases/da000292.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/31/releases/da000292.txt
                      • Division), in which case the applicant must indicate in Exhibit E that it has filed a confidentiality request. Because the required information bears on applicants' qualifications, the FCC envisions that confidentiality requests will not be routinely granted. Waivers: Applicants requesting waiver of any rules must submit a statement of reasons sufficient to justify the waiver sought. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Attachment E AUCTION-SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR FCC REMITTANCE ADVICE (FCC FORM 159) Upfront Payments The following information supplements the standard instructions for FCC Form 159, and is provided to help ensure correct completion of FCC Form 159 for upfront payments for Auction No. 31. Applicants need to complete FCC Form 159 carefully, since: Mistakes may affect their bidding eligibility; and Lack
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/31/releases/da001486.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/31/releases/da001486.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/31/releases/da001486.txt
                      • 4-A435), in which case the applicant must indicate in Exhibit E that it has filed a confidentiality request. Because the required information bears on applicants' qualifications, the FCC envisions that confidentiality requests will not be routinely granted. Waivers: Applicants requesting waiver of any rules must submit a statement of reasons sufficient to justify the waiver sought. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Attachment e ACCESSING THE FCC NETWORK TO FILE FCC FORM 175 This attachment describes how to access the FCC Network from a system that is running the Microsoft Windows 95 or Microsoft Windows 98 operating system. This involves configuring dial-up network access and then performing the dial-up procedure. Note: Dial-up access to the FCC Network is not required to submit
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/31/releases/da010012.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/31/releases/da010012.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/31/releases/da010012.txt
                      • 4-A435), in which case the applicant must indicate in Exhibit F that it has filed a confidentiality request. Because the required information bears on applicants' qualifications, the FCC envisions that confidentiality requests will not be routinely granted. Waivers: Applicants requesting waiver of any rules must submit a statement of reasons sufficient to justify the waiver sought. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Certifications: Applicants should carefully read the list of certifications on the FCC Form 175. These certifications help to ensure a fair and competitive auction and require, among other things, disclosure to the Commission of certain information on applicant ownership and agreements or arrangements concerning the auction. Submission of an FCC Form 175 application constitutes a representation by the certifying official
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/31/releases/da010788.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/31/releases/da010788.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/31/releases/da010788.txt
                      • Conversion to Digital Television, WT Docket No. 99-168, CS Docket No. 98-120, MM Docket No. 00-39, Third Report and Order, FCC 01-25 (rel. Jan. 23, 2001)(``Third Report and Order''). See ``Auction of Licenses for the 747-762 and 777-792 MHz Bands Postponed Until September 12, 2001,'' Public Notice, Report No. AUC-01-31-A, DA 01-266 (rel. Jan. 31, 2001). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (suspension, amendment, and waiver of Commission Rules). See also 5 U.S.C. � 553(b)(3)(B). See, e.g., 47 U.S.C. �� 309(j), 337. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. �� 1.49, 1.429. See, e.g., 47 U.S.C. �� 303, 309(j), 337. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). See id. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.419(c). - PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/31/releases/da020659.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/31/releases/da020659.txt
                      • to make minor corrections. During each filing period, submitted applications may be updated and amended multiple times until the filing deadline. A. Software Requirements Applicants will need to meet the following minimum software requirements: � Web Browser, either of the following: � Microsoft� Internet Explorer 4.0 or higher (recommended). Your browser must have either Microsoft VM or Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1 installed. � Netscape� Communicator� 4.0 or higher, with Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1. Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1 is available for downloading at http://java.sun.com/getjava/download.html. � PDF Viewer: Adobe Acrobat Reader 4.0 or higher (available at http://www.adobe.com) � If you wish to use the download feature on the Search Results page, you will need a .tar file extraction utility, e.g., Winzip (available at
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/31/releases/da020971.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/31/releases/da020971.txt
                      • by Erratum, Public Notice, DA 02-880 (rel. April 16, 2002); and Auction of Licenses in the 698-746 MHz Band Scheduled for June 19, 2002; Notice and Filing Requirements, Minimum Opening Bids, Upfront Payments and Other Auction Procedures, Public Notice, DA 02-563 (rel. March 20, 2002). 3 See 47 C.F.R. � 0.331 (authority delegated to Wireless Telecommunications Bureau); 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (suspension, amendment, and waiver of Commission Rules). Procedural Matters Parties submitting oppositions should address the issues raised in the Application for Review in light of the relevant statutory requirements,4 procedures,5 and public interest considerations.6 All responsive filings should reference the docket numbers of the underlying proceedings, i.e., WT Docket No. 99-168, GN Docket No. 01-74, as well as any other
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/33/releases/d000850a.doc
                      • Division), in which case the applicant must indicate in Exhibit E that it has filed a confidentiality request. Because the required information bears on applicants' qualifications, the FCC envisions that confidentiality requests will not be routinely granted. Waivers: Applicants requesting waiver of any rules must submit a statement of reasons sufficient to justify the waiver sought. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. XIII. ATTACHMENT H ACCESSING THE FCC NETWORK USING WINDOWS 95/98 This attachment describes how to access the FCC Network from a system that is running the Microsoft Windows 95 or Microsoft Windows 98 operating system. This involves configuring dial-up network access and then performing the dial-up procedure. Dial-up access to the FCC Network is required to submit FCC Form 175
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/33/releases/da000781.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/33/releases/da000781.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/33/releases/da000781.txt
                      • Division), in which case the applicant must indicate in Exhibit E that it has filed a confidentiality request. Because the required information bears on applicants' qualifications, the FCC envisions that confidentiality requests will not be routinely granted. Waivers: Applicants requesting waiver of any rules must submit a statement of reasons sufficient to justify the waiver sought. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Attachment E AUCTION-SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR FCC REMITTANCE ADVICE (FCC FORM 159) Upfront Payments The following information supplements the standard instructions for FCC Form 159, and is provided to help ensure correct completion of FCC Form 159 for upfront payments for Auction No. 33. Applicants need to complete FCC Form 159 carefully, since: Mistakes may affect their bidding eligibility; and Lack
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/34/releases/da001100.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/34/releases/da001100.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/34/releases/da001100.txt
                      • 4-A337), in which case the applicant must indicate in Exhibit E that it has filed a confidentiality request. Because the required information bears on applicants' qualifications, the FCC envisions that confidentiality requests will not be routinely granted. Waivers: Applicants requesting waiver of any rules must submit a statement of reasons sufficient to justify the waiver sought. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. X. ATTACHMENT E AUCTION-SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR FCC REMITTANCE ADVICE (FCC FORM 159) Upfront Payments The following information supplements the standard instructions for FCC Form 159, and is provided to help ensure correct completion of FCC Form 159 for upfront payments for Auction No. 34. Applicants need to complete FCC Form 159 carefully, since: Mistakes may affect their bidding eligibility; and
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/35/releases/d000145a.pdf
                      • CONCLUSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..__.........._........................._........................................... 19 ATTACHMENT: Affidavit of Stanley T. Sigman Group President --SBC National Operations - iv - : 0 --?--- `. PETITION OF SBC COMMUNICATIONS INC. FOR A WAIVER OF SECTION 24.709 AND FOR EXPEDITED ACTION . I. INTRODUCTION Pursuant to Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's Rules, SBC Communications Inc. ("SBC") hereby petitions for an expedited waiver of 47 C.F.R. 3 24.709 so that it can participate in the auction scheduled to begin on July 26,200O for reclaimed C and F block PCS authorizations. If the Commission wishes to see this spectrura, which has now lain fallow for over three years,
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/35/releases/d000191b.pdf
                      • CONCLUSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..__.........._........................._........................................... 19 ATTACHMENT: Affidavit of Stanley T. Sigman Group President --SBC National Operations - iv - : 0 --?--- `. PETITION OF SBC COMMUNICATIONS INC. FOR A WAIVER OF SECTION 24.709 AND FOR EXPEDITED ACTION . I. INTRODUCTION Pursuant to Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's Rules, SBC Communications Inc. ("SBC") hereby petitions for an expedited waiver of 47 C.F.R. 3 24.709 so that it can participate in the auction scheduled to begin on July 26,200O for reclaimed C and F block PCS authorizations. If the Commission wishes to see this spectrura, which has now lain fallow for over three years,
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/35/releases/da000191.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/35/releases/da000191.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/35/releases/da000191.txt
                      • ON NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.'S PETITION REGARDING PCS C AND F BLOCK SPECTRUM EXTENSION OF FILING DEADLINE FOR COMMENTS TO SBC COMMUNICATIONS INC.'S REQUEST FOR WAIVER Comment Date: February 14, 2000 Reply Date: February 22, 2000 Nextel Communications, Inc. (``Nextel'') has filed a petition requesting expedited rulemaking under Section 1.401, or in the alternative, waiver of the Commission's rules under Sections 1.3 and 1.925. Nextel seeks modification or waiver of the Commission's eligibility and bidding rules with respect to PCS C and F block spectrum. Section 24.709 of the Commission's rules restricts the eligibility for C and F block licenses to entities with total assets and gross revenues below specified levels. Nextel requests that the Commission allow companies other than such entities
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/35/releases/da000318.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/35/releases/da000318.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/35/releases/da000318.txt
                      • C and F block spectrum. Comments submitted in response to those Public Notices may, to the extent relevant, be incorporated by reference in comments submitted in response to this Public Notice. Commenters should address the sufficiency of the showings made by AT&T Wireless, BellSouth and Bell Atlantic in light of the requirements of 47 U.S.C. � 160, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 and any other public interest considerations. All comments should reference the DA number of this Public Notice (DA 00-318). Comments should be filed with the Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, TW B204, 445 12th St. S.W. Washington, DC 20554. Comments also should be provided to Steven Weingarten, Chief, Commercial Wireless Division, Room # 4-C224, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Federal
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/35/releases/da000760.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/35/releases/da000760.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/35/releases/da000760.txt
                      • Waiver of the Eligibility Requirements of 47 C.F.R. Section 24.709 for the PCS C and F Block Auction and for Expedited Action, filed January 21, 2000 (seeking expedited consideration of request to waive eligibility rules in Auction No. 35 to facilitate their preparation for that auction). See 47 C.F.R. � 0.331 (authority delegated to Wireless Telecommunications Bureau); 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (suspension, amendment, and waiver of Commission Rules). See also 5 U.S.C. � 553(b)(B). We note also that there are pending petitions for reconsideration on spectrum cap issues. See "Petitions for Reconsideration and Clarification of Action in Rulemaking Proceedings," Public Notice, Report No. 2387 (rel. February 8, 2000). See "Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Seeks Comment on SBC Communications Inc.'s Request for Waiver
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/35/releases/da002259.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/35/releases/da002259.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/35/releases/da002259.txt
                      • 4-A665), in which case the applicant must indicate in Exhibit G that it has filed a confidentiality request. Because the required information bears on applicants' qualifications, the FCC envisions that confidentiality requests will not be routinely granted. Waivers: Applicants requesting waiver of any rules must submit a statement of reasons sufficient to justify the waiver sought. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925. Attachment E AUCTION-SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR FCC REMITTANCE ADVICE (FCC FORM 159-July 1997 edition) Upfront Payments The following information supplements the standard instructions for FCC Form 159, and is provided to help ensure correct completion of FCC Form 159 for upfront payments for Auction No. 35. Applicants need to complete FCC Form 159 carefully, since: Mistakes may affect their bidding
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/35/releases/fc000313A.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/35/releases/fc000313A.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/35/releases/fc000313A.txt
                      • Atlantic, BellSouth, and GTE only supplied very general assertions that, absent lifting of the cap, they would face considerable difficulty rolling out 3G and other advanced broadband services. We agree with most of the commenters to the petitions that the petitioners failed to satisfy the waiver standard set forth either in the Biennial CMRS Spectrum Cap Order or in Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules. We also agree that Bell Atlantic failed to establish the basis for reversing our determination that the spectrum cap promoted the public interest, as would be necessary for granting a forbearance request. Finally, we find unpersuasive GTE's argument that the CMRS spectrum cap does not apply to the C and F block spectrum in the upcoming
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/36/releases/da001388.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/36/releases/da001388.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/36/releases/da001388.txt
                      • 4-A337), in which case the applicant must indicate in Exhibit E that it has filed a confidentiality request. Because the required information bears on applicants' qualifications, the FCC envisions that confidentiality requests will not be routinely granted. Waivers: Applicants requesting waiver of any rules must submit a statement of reasons sufficient to justify the waiver sought. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. ATTACHMENT E AUCTION-SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR FCC REMITTANCE ADVICE (FCC FORM 159) Upfront Payments The following information supplements the standard instructions for FCC Form 159, and is provided to help ensure correct completion of FCC Form 159 for upfront payments for Auction No. 36. Applicants need to complete FCC Form 159 carefully, since: Mistakes may affect their bidding eligibility; and Lack
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/37/releases/da010119.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/37/releases/da010119.txt
                      • Division), in which case the applicant must indicate in Exhibit F that it has filed a confidentiality request. Because the required information bears on applicants' qualifications, the FCC envisions that confidentiality requests will not be routinely granted. Waivers: Applicants requesting waiver of any rules must submit a statement of reasons sufficient to justify the waiver sought. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. X. ATTACHMENT E AUCTION-SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR FCC REMITTANCE ADVICE (FCC FORM 159) Upfront Payments The following information supplements the standard instructions for FCC Form 159, and is provided to help ensure correct completion of FCC Form 159 for upfront payments for Auction No. 37. Applicants need to complete FCC Form 159 carefully, since: Mistakes may affect their bidding eligibility; and
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/37/releases/da010119e.pdf
                      • in which case the 48 applicant must indicate in Exhibit F that it has filed a confidentiality request. Because the required information bears on applicants' qualifications, the FCC envisions that confidentiality requests will not be routinely granted. Waivers: Applicants requesting waiver of any rules must submit a statement of reasons sufficient to justify the waiver sought. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. 49 X. ATTACHMENT E AUCTION-SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR FCC REMITTANCE ADVICE (FCC FORM 159) Upfront Payments The following information supplements the standard instructions for FCC Form 159, and is provided to help ensure correct completion of FCC Form 159 for upfront payments for Auction No. 37. Applicants need to complete FCC Form 159 carefully, since: � Mistakes may affect their bidding
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/38/releases/da002571.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/38/releases/da002571.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/38/releases/da002571.txt
                      • Division), in which case the applicant must indicate in Exhibit F that it has filed a confidentiality request. Because the required information bears on applicants' qualifications, the FCC envisions that confidentiality requests will not be routinely granted. Waivers: Applicants requesting waiver of any rules must submit a statement of reasons sufficient to justify the waiver sought. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Attachment E AUCTION-SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR FCC REMITTANCE ADVICE (FCC FORM 159) Upfront Payments The following information supplements the standard instructions for FCC Form 159, and is provided to help ensure correct completion of FCC Form 159 for upfront payments for Auction No. 38. Applicants need to complete FCC Form 159 carefully, since: Mistakes may affect their bidding eligibility; and Lack
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/40/releases/da010850.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/40/releases/da010850.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/40/releases/da010850.txt
                      • on the FCC Form 175, will assist the Commission in monitoring the participation of these ``designated entities'' in its auctions. Exhibit F -- Miscellaneous Information: Applicants wishing to submit additional information should include it in Exhibit F. Waivers: Applicants requesting waiver of any rules must submit a statement of reasons sufficient to justify the waiver sought. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925. Certifications: Applicants should carefully read the list of certifications on the FCC Form 175. These certifications help to ensure a fair and competitive auction and require, among other things, disclosure to the Commission of certain information on applicant ownership and agreements or arrangements concerning the auction. Submission of an FCC Form 175 application constitutes a representation by the certifying
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/40/releases/da011961.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/40/releases/da011961.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/40/releases/da011961.txt
                      • is determined based on the percentage of the high bid used to calculate the defined increment. At the outset of the auction, the Bureau will use twenty percent (20%), in which case the Factor will be 1.2. The Bureau has discretion to change the percentage during the auction. If the percentage is thirty percent, for example, the Factor will be 1.3. In addition, the Bureau has discretion during Stage III of the auction to use a second, smaller percentage when calculating the increment used to set acceptable bids higher than the minimum acceptable bid. In all other respects, any such smaller defined increment will be calculated in the same manner as the defined increment used to set the minimum acceptable bid.
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/40/releases/da012262.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/40/releases/da012262.txt
                      • software: � CPU: Pentium 133 or above � RAM: 32 MB (64 MB recommended) � Monitor: VGA or above � Mouse or other pointing device � Operating System: Microsoft� Windows� 95�, 98�, 2000�, ME�, NT� � Web Browser, either of the following: � Microsoft Internet Explorer 4.0 or higher (recommended) � Netscape� Communicator� 4.0 or higher, with Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1 (available for downloading at http://java.sun.com/products/plugin/) In addition, users accessing the Bidding System via the FCC's Wide Area Network will need: � Modem: 28.8 Kbps Hayes� compatible modem or faster (56.6 Kbps recommended) � Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) Dialer: Use the Dial-Up Networking feature included with the operating system Access to the FCC Bidding System via the Wide Area Network requires access
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/40/releases/da012418.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/40/releases/da012418.txt
                      • software: � CPU: Pentium 133 or above � RAM: 32 MB (64 MB recommended) � Monitor: VGA or above � Mouse or other pointing device � Operating System: Microsoft� Windows� 95�, 98�, 2000�, ME�, NT� � Web Browser, either of the following: � Microsoft Internet Explorer 4.0 or higher (recommended) � Netscape� Communicator� 4.0 or higher, with Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1 (available for downloading at http://java.sun.com/products/plugin/) In addition, users accessing the Bidding System via the FCC's wide area network will need: D-2 � Modem: 28.8 Kbps Hayes� compatible modem or faster (56.6 Kbps recommended) � Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) Dialer: Use the Dial-Up Networking feature included with the operating system B. Accessing the FCC Mock Auction To access the Mock Auction, point
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/40/releases/da012418D.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/40/releases/da012418D.txt
                      • software: � CPU: Pentium 133 or above � RAM: 32 MB (64 MB recommended) � Monitor: VGA or above � Mouse or other pointing device � Operating System: Microsoft� Windows� 95�, 98�, 2000�, ME�, NT� � Web Browser, either of the following: � Microsoft Internet Explorer 4.0 or higher (recommended) � Netscape� Communicator� 4.0 or higher, with Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1 (available for downloading at http://java.sun.com/products/plugin/) In addition, users accessing the Bidding System via the FCC's wide area network will need: D-2 � Modem: 28.8 Kbps Hayes� compatible modem or faster (56.6 Kbps recommended) � Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) Dialer: Use the Dial-Up Networking feature included with the operating system B. Accessing the FCC Mock Auction To access the Mock Auction, point
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/40/releases/da012418E.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/40/releases/da012418E.txt
                      • System: Microsoft� Windows� 95�, 98�, 2000�, ME�, NT� � Modem: 28.8 Kbps Hayes� compatible modem or faster (56.6 Kbps recommended) � Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) Dialer: Use the Dial-Up Networking feature included with the operating system � Web Browser, either of the following: � Microsoft Internet Explorer 4.0 or higher (recommended) � Netscape� Communicator� 4.0 or higher, with Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1 (available for downloading at http://java.sun.com/products/plugin/) 2. Connecting to the FCC Network To connect to the FCC Network, you must use Dial-Up Networking. Dial-Up Networking E-6 establishes a point-to-point connection from your PC to the FCC Network. This point-to-point connection is not routed through the Internet. To access the FCC Bidding System, configure your dial-up network to dial 900-555-5335. (Alternatively, you
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/41/releases/da011592.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/41/releases/da011592.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/41/releases/da011592.txt
                      • on the FCC Form 175, will assist the Commission in monitoring the participation of these ``designated entities'' in its auctions. Exhibit F -- Miscellaneous Information: Applicants wishing to submit additional information should include it in Exhibit F. Waivers: Applicants requesting waiver of any rules must submit a statement of reasons sufficient to justify the waiver sought. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925. Certifications: Applicants should carefully read the list of certifications on the FCC Form 175. These certifications help to ensure a fair and competitive auction and require, among other things, disclosure to the Commission of certain information on applicant ownership and agreements or arrangements concerning the auction. Submission of an FCC Form 175 application constitutes a representation by the certifying
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/42/releases/da012349.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/42/releases/da012349.txt
                      • �1.1208. 20 See "Commission Announces that Mutually Exclusive `Short-Form' Applications (Form 175) to Participate in Competitive Bidding Process (`Auctions') Are Treated as Exempt for Ex Parte Purposes," Public Notice, 9 FCC Rcd 6760 (1994). 6 � Web Browser, either of the following: � Microsoft Internet Explorer 4.0 or higher (recommended) � Netscape� Communicator� 4.0 or higher, with Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1 (available for downloading at http://java.sun.com/products/plugin/) In addition, users accessing the Bidding System via the FCC's Wide Area Network will need: � Modem: 28.8 Kbps Hayes� compatible modem or faster (56.6 Kbps recommended) � Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) Dialer: Use the Dial-Up Networking feature included with the operating system Access to the FCC Bidding System via the Wide Area Network requires access
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/42/releases/da012507.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/42/releases/da012507.txt
                      • software: � CPU: Pentium 133 or above � RAM: 32 MB (64 MB recommended) � Monitor: VGA or above � Mouse or other pointing device � Operating System: Microsoft� Windows� 95�, 98�, 2000�, ME�, NT� � Web Browser, either of the following: � Microsoft Internet Explorer 4.0 or higher (recommended) � Netscape� Communicator� 4.0 or higher, with Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1 (available for downloading at http://java.sun.com/products/plugin/) In addition, users accessing the Bidding System via the FCC's wide area network will need: � Modem: 28.8 Kbps Hayes� compatible modem or faster (56.6 Kbps recommended) � Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) Dialer: Use the Dial-Up Networking feature included with the operating system B. Accessing the FCC Mock Auction To access the Mock Auction, point your
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/42/releases/da012507D.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/42/releases/da012507D.txt
                      • software: � CPU: Pentium 133 or above � RAM: 32 MB (64 MB recommended) � Monitor: VGA or above � Mouse or other pointing device � Operating System: Microsoft� Windows� 95�, 98�, 2000�, ME�, NT� � Web Browser, either of the following: � Microsoft Internet Explorer 4.0 or higher (recommended) � Netscape� Communicator� 4.0 or higher, with Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1 (available for downloading at http://java.sun.com/products/plugin/) In addition, users accessing the Bidding System via the FCC's wide area network will need: � Modem: 28.8 Kbps Hayes� compatible modem or faster (56.6 Kbps recommended) � Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) Dialer: Use the Dial-Up Networking feature included with the operating system B. Accessing the FCC Mock Auction To access the Mock Auction, point your
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/42/releases/da012507E.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/42/releases/da012507E.txt
                      • System: Microsoft� Windows� 95�, 98�, 2000�, ME�, NT� � Modem: 28.8 Kbps Hayes� compatible modem or faster (56.6 Kbps recommended) � Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) Dialer: Use the Dial-Up Networking feature included with the operating system � Web Browser, either of the following: � Microsoft Internet Explorer 4.0 or higher (recommended) � Netscape� Communicator� 4.0 or higher, with Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1 (available for downloading at http://java.sun.com/products/plugin/) 2. Connecting to the FCC Network To connect to the FCC Network, you must use Dial-Up Networking. Dial-Up Networking establishes a point-to-point connection from your PC to the FCC Network. This point-to-point connection is not routed through the Internet. To access the FCC Bidding System, configure your dial-up network to dial 900-555-5335. (Alternatively, you can
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/43/releases/da012315.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/43/releases/da012315.txt
                      • period to make minor corrections. During each filing period, submitted applications may be updated and amended multiple times until the filing deadline. A. Software Requirements Applicants will need to meet the following minimum software requirements: � Web Browser, either of the following: � Microsoft Internet Explorer 4.0 or higher (recommended) � Netscape� Communicator� 4.0 or higher, with Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1 (available for downloading at http://java.sun.com/products/plugin/) � PDF Viewer: Adobe Acrobat Reader 4.0 or higher (available at http://www.adobe.com) � If you wish to use the download feature on the Search Results page, you will need a .tar file extraction utility, e.g., Winzip (available at http://www.winzip.com) or Pkzip for Windows (available at http://www.pkware.com/shareware). B. Submitting FCC Form 175 Applications You can submit
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/43/releases/da012902.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/43/releases/da012902.txt
                      • software: � CPU: Pentium 133 or above � RAM: 32 MB (64 MB recommended) � Monitor: VGA or above � Mouse or other pointing device � Operating System: Microsoft� Windows� 95�, 98�, 2000�, ME�, NT� � Web Browser, either of the following: � Microsoft Internet Explorer 4.0 or higher (recommended) � Netscape� Communicator� 4.0 or higher, with Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1 (available for downloading at http://java.sun.com/products/plugin/) In addition, users accessing the Bidding System via the FCC's wide area network will need: � Modem: 28.8 Kbps Hayes� compatible modem or faster (56.6 Kbps recommended) � Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) Dialer: Use the Dial-Up Networking feature included with the operating system B. Accessing the FCC Mock Auction To access the Mock Auction, point your
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/43/releases/da012902D.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/43/releases/da012902D.txt
                      • software: � CPU: Pentium 133 or above � RAM: 32 MB (64 MB recommended) � Monitor: VGA or above � Mouse or other pointing device � Operating System: Microsoft� Windows� 95�, 98�, 2000�, ME�, NT� � Web Browser, either of the following: � Microsoft Internet Explorer 4.0 or higher (recommended) � Netscape� Communicator� 4.0 or higher, with Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1 (available for downloading at http://java.sun.com/products/plugin/) In addition, users accessing the Bidding System via the FCC's wide area network will need: � Modem: 28.8 Kbps Hayes� compatible modem or faster (56.6 Kbps recommended) � Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) Dialer: Use the Dial-Up Networking feature included with the operating system B. Accessing the FCC Mock Auction To access the Mock Auction, point your
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/43/releases/da012902E.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/43/releases/da012902E.txt
                      • System: Microsoft� Windows� 95�, 98�, 2000�, ME�, NT� � Modem: 28.8 Kbps Hayes� compatible modem or faster (56.6 Kbps recommended) � Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) Dialer: Use the Dial-Up Networking feature included with the operating system � Web Browser, either of the following: � Microsoft Internet Explorer 4.0 or higher (recommended) � Netscape� Communicator� 4.0 or higher, with Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1 (available for downloading at http://java.sun.com/products/plugin/) 2. Connecting to the FCC Network To connect to the FCC Network, you must use Dial-Up Networking. Dial-Up Networking establishes a point-to-point connection from your PC to the FCC Network. This point-to-point connection is not routed through the Internet. To access the FCC Bidding System, configure your dial-up network to dial 900-555-5335. (Alternatively, you can
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/44/releases/da020563.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/44/releases/da020563.txt
                      • to make minor corrections. During each filing period, submitted applications may be updated and amended multiple times until the filing deadline. A. Software Requirements Applicants will need to meet the following minimum software requirements: � Web Browser, either of the following: � Microsoft� Internet Explorer 4.0 or higher (recommended). Your browser must have either Microsoft VM or Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1 installed. � Netscape� Communicator� 4.0 or higher, with Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1. Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1 is available for downloading at http://java.sun.com/getjava/download.html. � PDF Viewer: Adobe Acrobat Reader 4.0 or higher (available at http://www.adobe.com) If you wish to use the download feature on the Search Results page, you will need a .tar file extraction utility, e.g., Winzip (available at http://www.winzip.com)
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/44/releases/da020607.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/44/releases/da020607.txt
                      • the Reference Center, Room CY A257, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20554. Copies of the petitions are also available from Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554, telephone (202) 863- 2893, facsimile (202) 863-2898, or e-mail at qualexint@aol.com. 4 See 47 C.F.R. � 0.331 (authority delegated to Wireless Telecommunications Bureau); 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (suspension, amendment, and waiver of Commission Rules). See also 5 U.S.C. � 553(b)(B). 5 See, e.g., 47 U.S.C. � 309. 6 See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. � 1.429. 7 See, e.g., 47 U.S.C. �� 303, 309. 8 See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206. 9 See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). 10 Id. Oppositions to petitions for reconsideration and replies may be filed
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/44/releases/da021346.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/44/releases/da021346.txt
                      • 32 MB (64 MB recommended) � Monitor: VGA or above � Mouse or other pointing device � Operating System: Microsoft� Windows� 95�, 98�, 2000�, ME�, NT� � Web Browser, either of the following: � Microsoft� Internet Explorer 4.0 or higher (recommended). If you have Internet Explorer 5.0 or higher, your browser must have either Microsoft VM or Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1 installed. � Netscape� Communicator� 4.0 or higher, with Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1. Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1 is available for downloading at D-2 http://java.sun.com/getjava/download.html. In addition, users accessing the Automated Auction System via the FCC's wide area network will need: � Modem: 28.8 Kbps Hayes� compatible modem or faster (56.6 Kbps recommended) � Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) Dialer: Use the Dial-Up Networking
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/44/releases/da021346d.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/44/releases/da021346d.txt
                      • 32 MB (64 MB recommended) � Monitor: VGA or above � Mouse or other pointing device � Operating System: Microsoft� Windows� 95�, 98�, 2000�, ME�, NT� � Web Browser, either of the following: � Microsoft� Internet Explorer 4.0 or higher (recommended). If you have Internet Explorer 5.0 or higher, your browser must have either Microsoft VM or Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1 installed. � Netscape� Communicator� 4.0 or higher, with Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1. Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1 is available for downloading at D-2 http://java.sun.com/getjava/download.html. In addition, users accessing the Automated Auction System via the FCC's wide area network will need: � Modem: 28.8 Kbps Hayes� compatible modem or faster (56.6 Kbps recommended) � Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) Dialer: Use the Dial-Up Networking
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/44/releases/da021346e.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/44/releases/da021346e.txt
                      • Hayes� compatible modem or faster (56.6 Kbps recommended) � Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) Dialer: Use the Dial-Up Networking feature included with the operating system � Web Browser, with cookies enabled, either of the following: � Microsoft� Internet Explorer 4.0 or higher (recommended). If you have Internet Explorer 5.0 or higher, your browser must have either Microsoft VM or Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1 installed. � Netscape� Communicator� 4.0 or higher, with Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1. Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1 is available for downloading at http://java.sun.com/getjava/download.html. E-7 2. Connecting to the FCC Network To connect to the FCC Network, you must use Dial-Up Networking. Dial-Up Networking establishes a point-to-point connection from your PC to the FCC Network. This point-to-point connection is not routed through
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/44/releases/fc010364.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/44/releases/fc010364.txt
                      • calculated using the manufacturer specifications of the transmitting antenna to be used. Federal Communications Commission FCC 01-364 D-2 available according to manufacturer specifications for typical land mobile base station receive antennas (see Figure 1, for example). In fact, vertical attenuation values as great as 30 dB can be provided, and this value is assumed in the sample computations of Table 1.3 The sample computations examine the desired- to-undesired (D/U) signal ratio at base station receivers with an antenna height of 38.1 meters (125 feet). The undesired adjacent channel signal source is assumed to be a 50 kW transmitting antenna at a height of 381 meters (1250 feet). The Hata propagation prediction model is used to estimate the strength of the signal
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/45/releases/da020470.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/45/releases/da020470.txt
                      • submitted applications may be updated and amended multiple times until the filing deadline. A. Software Requirements Applicants will need to meet the following minimum software requirements: � Web Browser, either of the following: � Microsoft� Internet Explorer 4.0 or higher (recommended). If you have Internet Explorer 5.0 or higher, your browser must have either Microsoft VM or Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1 installed. � Netscape� Communicator� 4.0 or higher, with Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1. Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1 is available for downloading at http://java.sun.com/getjava/download.html. � PDF Viewer: Adobe Acrobat Reader 4.0 or higher (available at http://www.adobe.com) � If you wish to use the download feature on the Search Results page, you will need a .tar file extraction utility, e.g., Winzip (available at
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/45/releases/da020965.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/45/releases/da020965.txt
                      • FCC Rcd 6760 (1994). 6 � Monitor: VGA or above � Mouse or other pointing device � Operating System: Microsoft� Windows� 95�, 98�, 2000�, ME�, NT� � Web Browser, either of the following: � Microsoft� Internet Explorer 4.0 or higher (recommended). If you have Internet Explorer 5.0 or higher, your browser must have either Microsoft VM or Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1 installed. � Netscape� Communicator� 4.0 or higher, with Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1. Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1 is available for downloading at http://java.sun.com/getjava/download.html. In addition, users accessing the FCC Automated Auction System via the FCC's Wide Area Network will need: � Modem: 28.8 Kbps Hayes� compatible modem or faster (56.6 Kbps recommended) � Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) Dialer: Use the Dial-Up Networking
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/45/releases/da021147.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/45/releases/da021147.txt
                      • 32 MB (64 MB recommended) � Monitor: VGA or above � Mouse or other pointing device � Operating System: Microsoft� Windows� 95�, 98�, 2000�, ME�, NT� � Web Browser, either of the following: � Microsoft� Internet Explorer 4.0 or higher (recommended). If you have Internet Explorer 5.0 or higher, your browser must have either Microsoft VM or Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1 installed. � Netscape� Communicator� 4.0 or higher, with Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1. Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1 is available for downloading at http://java.sun.com/getjava/download.html. In addition, users accessing the FCC Automated Auction System via the FCC's wide area network will need: � Modem: 28.8 Kbps Hayes� compatible modem or faster (56.6 Kbps recommended) � Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) Dialer: Use the Dial-Up Networking
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/45/releases/da021147d.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/45/releases/da021147d.txt
                      • 32 MB (64 MB recommended) � Monitor: VGA or above � Mouse or other pointing device � Operating System: Microsoft� Windows� 95�, 98�, 2000�, ME�, NT� � Web Browser, either of the following: � Microsoft� Internet Explorer 4.0 or higher (recommended). If you have Internet Explorer 5.0 or higher, your browser must have either Microsoft VM or Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1 installed. � Netscape� Communicator� 4.0 or higher, with Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1. Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1 is available for downloading at http://java.sun.com/getjava/download.html. In addition, users accessing the FCC Automated Auction System via the FCC's wide area network will need: � Modem: 28.8 Kbps Hayes� compatible modem or faster (56.6 Kbps recommended) � Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) Dialer: Use the Dial-Up Networking
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/45/releases/da021147e.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/45/releases/da021147e.txt
                      • Modem: 28.8 Kbps Hayes� compatible modem or faster (56.6 Kbps recommended) � Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) Dialer: Use the Dial-Up Networking feature included with the operating system � Web Browser, either of the following: � Microsoft� Internet Explorer 4.0 or higher (recommended). If you have Internet Explorer 5.0 or higher, your browser must have either Microsoft VM or Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1 installed. � Netscape� Communicator� 4.0 or higher, with Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1. Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1 is available for downloading at http://java.sun.com/getjava/download.html. 2. Connecting to the FCC Network To connect to the FCC Network, you must use Dial-Up Networking. Dial-Up Networking establishes a point-to-point connection from your PC to the FCC Network. This point-to-point connection is not routed through the
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/46/releases/da021871.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/46/releases/da021871.txt
                      • resubmission period to make minor corrections. During each filing period, submitted applications may be updated and amended multiple times until the filing deadline. A. Software Requirements Applicants will need to meet the following minimum software requirements: Web Browser, either of the following: Microsoft� Internet Explorer 4.0 or higher (recommended). Your browser must have either Microsoft VM or Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1 installed. Netscape� Communicator� 4.0 or higher, with Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1. Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1 is available for downloading at http://java.sun.com/getjava/download.html. PDF Viewer: Adobe Acrobat Reader 5.0 or higher (available at http://www.adobe.com) If you wish to use the download feature on the Search Results page, you will need a .tar file extraction utility, e.g., Winzip (available at http://www.winzip.com) or Pkzip
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc020116.pdf
                      • -0.2 110 562.3 618.53 -172.0 -172.1 619.510.2 57.2 -0.1 119 810.3 891.33 -173.2 -172.1 926.714.4 116.4 1.1 Salt Lake City, UT SatelliteBaseline Outage Baseline Outage plus 10% Increase EPFD For 10% Increase FCC Adopted EPFD Outage With FCC EPFD Outage IncreaseDifference Between Calculated And FCC EPFDs (minutes)(minutes) (dBW/m2/4 kHz) (minutes) % (minutes) DB 101 65.5 72.05 -172.3 -171.0 75.615.4 10.1 1.3 110 64.4 70.84 -172.5 -171.0 74.515.7 10.1 1.5 119 84.9 93.39 -173.4 -171.0 101.219.2 16.3 2.4 Omaha, Nebraska SatelliteBaseline Outage Baseline Outage plus 10% Increase EPFD For 10% Increase FCC Adopted EPFD Outage With FCC EPFD Outage IncreaseDifference Between Calculated And FCC EPFDs (minutes)(minutes) (dBW/m2/4 kHz) (minutes) % (minutes) DB 101 360.3 396.33 -168.8 -169.8 389 8.0 28.7 -1 110
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/82/releases/da020004.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/82/releases/da020004.txt
                      • software: � CPU: Pentium 133 or above � RAM: 32 MB (64 MB recommended) � Monitor: VGA or above � Mouse or other pointing device � Operating System: Microsoft� Windows� 95�, 98�, 2000�, ME�, NT� � Web Browser, either of the following: � Microsoft Internet Explorer 4.0 or higher (recommended) � Netscape� Communicator� 4.0 or higher, with Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1 (available for downloading at http://java.sun.com/products/plugin/) In addition, users accessing the Bidding System via the FCC's Wide Area Network will need: � Modem: 28.8 Kbps Hayes� compatible modem or faster (56.6 Kbps recommended) � Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) Dialer: Use the Dial-Up Networking feature included with the operating system Access to the FCC Bidding System via the Wide Area Network requires access
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/82/releases/da020004c.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/82/releases/da020004c.txt
                      • their FCC Form 175 amendments. During the filing period, submitted applications may be updated and amended multiple times until the filing deadline. A. Software Requirements Applicants will need to meet the following minimum software requirements: � Web Browser, either of the following: � Microsoft Internet Explorer 4.0 or higher (recommended) � Netscape� Communicator� 4.0 or higher, with Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1 (available for downloading at http://java.sun.com/products/plugin/) � PDF Viewer: Adobe Acrobat Reader 4.0 or higher (available at http://www.adobe.com) � If you wish to use the download feature on the Search Results page, you will need a .tar file extraction utility, e.g., Winzip (available at http://www.winzip.com) or Pkzip for Windows (available at http://www.pkware.com/shareware). B. Registering In CORES To participate in FCC auctions,
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/82/releases/da02155.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/82/releases/da02155.txt
                      • software: � CPU: Pentium 133 or above � RAM: 32 MB (64 MB recommended) � Monitor: VGA or above � Mouse or other pointing device � Operating System: Microsoft� Windows� 95�, 98�, 2000�, ME�, NT� � Web Browser, either of the following: � Microsoft Internet Explorer 4.0 or higher (recommended) � Netscape� Communicator� 4.0 or higher, with Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1 (available for downloading at http://java.sun.com/products/plugin/) In addition, users accessing the Bidding System via the FCC's wide area network will need: D-2 � Modem: 28.8 Kbps Hayes� compatible modem or faster (56.6 Kbps recommended) � Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) Dialer: Use the Dial-Up Networking feature included with the operating system B. Accessing the FCC Mock Auction To access the Mock Auction, point
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/82/releases/da02155d.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/82/releases/da02155d.txt
                      • software: � CPU: Pentium 133 or above � RAM: 32 MB (64 MB recommended) � Monitor: VGA or above � Mouse or other pointing device � Operating System: Microsoft� Windows� 95�, 98�, 2000�, ME�, NT� � Web Browser, either of the following: � Microsoft Internet Explorer 4.0 or higher (recommended) � Netscape� Communicator� 4.0 or higher, with Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1 (available for downloading at http://java.sun.com/products/plugin/) In addition, users accessing the Bidding System via the FCC's wide area network will need: D-2 � Modem: 28.8 Kbps Hayes� compatible modem or faster (56.6 Kbps recommended) � Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) Dialer: Use the Dial-Up Networking feature included with the operating system B. Accessing the FCC Mock Auction To access the Mock Auction, point
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/82/releases/da02155e.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/82/releases/da02155e.txt
                      • System: Microsoft� Windows� 95�, 98�, 2000�, ME�, NT� � Modem: 28.8 Kbps Hayes� compatible modem or faster (56.6 Kbps recommended) � Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) Dialer: Use the Dial-Up Networking feature included with the operating system � Web Browser, either of the following: � Microsoft Internet Explorer 4.0 or higher (recommended) � Netscape� Communicator� 4.0 or higher, with Java Plug-In Version 1.3.1 (available for downloading at http://java.sun.com/products/plugin/) E-6 2. Connecting to the FCC Network To connect to the FCC Network, you must use Dial-Up Networking. Dial-Up Networking establishes a point-to-point connection from your PC to the FCC Network. This point-to-point connection is not routed through the Internet. To access the FCC Bidding System, configure your dial-up network to dial 900-555-5335. (Alternatively, you
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/conferences/combin2000/releases/98540192.pdf
                      • 250 17 96% 26% 8 565 18 553 15 92% 28% 9 300 18 300 18 100% 28% 10610 18 610 18 100% 33% 11365 18 350 15 85% 88% 12550 18 558 15 88% 55% 13450 18 450 18 100% 31% 14410 18 410 18 100% 5% 15485 18 484 19 89% 39% � = 17.3 95% 27% = 1.3 5 21 37 H. Combinatorial Auctions The general concept of smart computer-assisted markets, and the specific version known as a "combinatorial auction," originated in the early 1980s. (Rassenti, 1981; Rassenti, Smith and Bulfin, 1982; hereafter RSB). As noted by RSB (p. 672): To our knowledge, this study constitutes the first attempt to design a "smart" computer-assisted exchange institution. In all
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/conferences/combin2000/releases/cr_1.pdf
                      • on the current round. The example rounds the calculation of the index to the nearest tenth and the bid increment to the nearest percentage point. Round New Bids Activity Index Percentage Increment 0 0.0 1 4 2.0 15 2 3 2.5 15 3 3 2.8 15 4 2 2.4 15 5 2 2.2 15 6 1 1.6 13 7 1 1.3 11 8 1 1.1 11 9 0 0.6 8 10 0 0.3 6 11 1 0.6 8 12 1 0.8 9 13 4 2.4 15 14 4 3.2 15 15 2 2.6 15 16 1 1.8 14 17 0 0.9 10 18 0 0.5 7 19 0 0.2 6 20 1 0.6 8 21 0 0.3 7 22 1 0.7
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/conferences/combin2000/releases/cr_3.pdf
                      • upshot is that the outcome is inefficient. The nationwide bidder N wins and the auction revenues are reduced from $3.2 billion to $3.0 billion. This result is a consequence of a free-rider problem in that, while either E or W could raise their individual bids to beat N, each would prefer the other to bear the cost of doing so. 1.3 The Computational Complexity Problem There is another problem constraining the use of package bidding. As the number of possible packages that bidders are allowed to bid on grows, the computational burden imposed on the mechanism and on the bidders grows even faster. For example, with only five regional licenses to sell, allowing all possible packages would require only 25 -1=31
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/conferences/combin2003/presentations/parkes8fcc03a.pdf
                      • ! bi(S)=(1-() vi(S), "S, if buyer ! bi(S)=(1+()vi(S), "S, if seller x*((,(*)is the allocation, pi((,(*)is payment to agent i. ! Compute a symmetric ex anteBNE: (*= arg max(EiE-i[vi(x((,(*)) -pi((,(*)] Naive Approach ! Enumerate a payoff matrix, compute ex anteBNE -0.5 -0.48 ...0 ...0.12 0.14 ...0.98 1.0 -0.5 -0.48 ... 0 ... 0.12 0.14 ... 0.98 1.0 (-i (i 1.5 1.4 1.3 Took 2.5 days, for a grid size of 0.01, 500 instances, 5 buyers, 5 sellers, 20 goods, 10 bids/asks per agent. 11/23/2003 Combinatorial Exchanges Iterative Approach. 10 14 11 8 6 10 16 13 10 6 (=0.26 (=0.18 (=0.22 11/23/2003 Combinatorial Exchanges Algorithm ! Choose a small set of strategies At=((t1,...,(tM). ! Assume all agents except agent 1 play (t$At
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/data/papersAndStudies/fc000289.pdf
                      • percent of the total U.S. population, have three or more different operators (cellular, PCS, and/or Nextel) offering mobile telephone service in the counties in which they live. However, these counties make up only 35 percent of the total land area of the United States, reflecting the nation's uneven population distribution. On the other hand, the land area of these counties, 1.3 million square miles, is roughly equal to the combined land area of the 15 members of the European Union. Over 173 million people, or 69 percent of the U.S. population, live in areas with five or more mobile telephone operators competing to offer service. And 11 million people, or 4 percent of the population, can choose from among seven different
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/data/papersAndStudies/fc9775.pdf
                      • allocate more spectrum that can be used to provide CMRS.260 In March 1996, we released a Spectrum Plan indicating how we plan to make spec- trum being transferred from Federal Government use available for private sector use.261 The process of implementing this Plan is underway and, by the year 2000, could make an additional 70 megahertz of spectrum in the 1.3-1.6 GHz, and the 3.6 GHz bands available for CMRS. These additional spectrum allocations should expand the quantity, quality, and variety of wireless services, increase the number of CMRS providers and, ultimately, lead to lower prices for con- sumers. The Commission has made extensive use of its auction authority as the most efficient means of assigning this newly-allocated spectrum to providers
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/data/papersAndStudies/fc99136.pdf
                      • 1997. Some operators even experienced quarters with churn as high as 5.5 percent. While cellular operators have lower churn, usually at or below 2 percent,117 their churn levels have grown from 1.9 percent in 1996 to 2.0 percent in 1998. Historically, Nextel has kept its churn around 1.0 percent. However, its churn has risen from 1.0 percent in 1996118 to 1.3 percent in 1997119 to 1.8 percent in 1998.120 114See DLJ Report, at 18. 115This assumes that each churned customer is a unique individual and that the same customers do not churn multiple times. 116See Appendix B, Table 7, p. B-9. 117A lower level of geographic coverage and a higher reliance on pre-paid subscribers are reasons most often given for the
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/isas/Ausubel_et_al.pdf
                      • approach where the valuation of a package depends on a few parameters. In auctions where the licenses differ greatly in the population covered, the scale component is better represented by the population covered rather than the number of licenses. However, in the context of the experiment it seems fine to have licenses about the same size. The valuation model (eq. 1.3) is too simple to address the differing effects of geographic coverage and bandwidth. For example, it is common for bidders to have diminishing marginal value for bandwidth in a geographic area and yet increasing returns with greater geographic coverage. This is not possible with the proposed model. The experimental design mentions budget constraints, but then they are not considered in
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/commoperators/Element%209.pdf
                      • Figure 9B-1 9B01 (C) With a 1VDC input the output of the operational amplifier shown on Figure 9B-1 is: A. -3VDC. B. 2VDC. C. 3VDC. D. -2VDC. Figure 9B-2 9B02 (B) On Figure 9B-2, with an input voltage of +5 volts, the voltage measured at the inverting (-) input of the op-amp will be: A. +5 volts B. 0V. C. 1.3 volts D. 0.7 volts 9B03 (C) In the op amp circuit shown on Figure 9B-3, the output voltage will be: A. V2 - V1 B. 2 x (V1 - V2) C. -2 x (V1 + V2). D. V1 + V2 Figure 9B-3 Figure 9B-4 9B04 (A) In the comparator circuit shown on Figure 9B-4, the nominal output voltage when the
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/commoperators/element6.doc
                      • same volume of distilled water: A.Specific gravity B.Specific mass C.Specific volume D.None of the above 6A256 D Edison type batteries: A.Have plates up nickel B.Have plates of iron C.Have plates of compounds of nickel and iron D.All of the above 6A257 D The electrolyte of a lead-acid storage cell: A.Concentrated sulfuric acid B.Dilute sulfuric acid C.Has a specific gravity about 1.3 fully charged D.B & C 6A258 A The negative plate of a lead-acid storage cell: A.Is composed of pure spongy lead B.Is composed of lead peroxide C.Is composed of a compound of pure spongy lead and lead peroxide D.None of the above 6A259 B The positive plate of a lead-acid storage cell: A.Is composed of pure spongy lead B.Is composed
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/100317/Airadigm%20Communicati_188.PDF
                      • FCC ID W490 IHDT56HB1 Air Interfaces/Frequency Bands 850 MHz GSM 900 MHz GSM 1800 MHz GSM 1900 MHz GSM Page5 of 16 FCC Form 655 June 2009 Reference Copy Is this handset capable of Wi-Fi voice operations? No This handset model was offered from: 11/09 to 12/09 M-Rating: M3 T-Rating: T3 Wi-Fi Interface Dates Ratings Functionality Level Memory card slot, 1.3 Megapixel camera, Bluetooth (Med/High) Remarks Handset Maker Handset 9: Motorola W510 Motorola Handset Model Name FCC ID W510 IHDT56HB1 Air Interfaces/Frequency Bands 850 MHz GSM 900 MHz GSM 1800 MHz GSM 1900 MHz GSM Is this handset capable of Wi-Fi voice operations? No This handset model was offered from: 01/09 to 06/09 M-Rating: M3 T-Rating: T3 Wi-Fi Interface Dates Ratings
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/100317/Centennial%20Communica_205.PDF
                      • offered on handsets in this category are simple handsets with no cameras to a handset with a VGA camera; Bluetooth and speakerphone options. From a design perspective, Basic handsets can be a bar or flip-phone. Enhanced � Handsets in this category have price points from $150 to $300. Features offered on handsets in this category include camera with 1 to 1.3 mega pixels; Bluetooth, EVDO and MP3. Premium - Handsets in this category include any handset exceeding $300. Features offered on handsets in this category include camera phones with at least 1.3 mega pixels and/or video capability; Stereo Bluetooth; touch screens; EVDO; MP3, personal organizers. Methodology for Functionality Levels Centennial sales and customer representatives have been made aware of the HAC
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/100317/Horry%20Telephone%20Coop_103.PDF
                      • ID SGH-A767 A3LSGHA767 Air Interfaces/Frequency Bands 850 MHz GSM 900 MHz GSM 1800 MHz GSM 1900 MHz GSM Page9 of 31 FCC Form 655 June 2009 Reference Copy Is this handset capable of Wi-Fi voice operations? No This handset model was offered from: 11/08 to 12/09 M-Rating: M3 T-Rating: T4 Wi-Fi Interface Dates Ratings Functionality Level Slider, Bluetooth, Camera, GPS, 1.3 MP Camera, HSDPA 3.6 Remarks Handset Maker Handset 17: Samsung SGH-A837 Samsung Handset Model Name FCC ID SGH-A837 A3LSGHA837 Air Interfaces/Frequency Bands 850 MHz GSM 900 MHz GSM 1800 MHz GSM 1900 MHz GSM Is this handset capable of Wi-Fi voice operations? No This handset model was offered from: 09/08 to 12/09 M-Rating: M3 T-Rating: T3 Wi-Fi Interface Dates Ratings
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/120307/6565969_263.PDF
                      • 850 MHz CDMA 1900 MHz CDMA Is this handset capable of voice communication over any air interface or frequency band that does not currently have hearing aid compatibility technical standards? No This handset model was offered from: 01/11 to 12/11 M-Rating: M3 T-Rating: T3 Additional Air Interfaces and Frequency Bands Dates Ratings Functionality Level bluetooth, QWERTY Remarks email, SMS and 1.3Mega Pixel Camera Handset Maker Handset 3: LG VI5225 LG Handset Model Name FCC ID VI5225 BEJLX5400 Air Interfaces/Frequency Bands 850 MHz CDMA 1900 MHz CDMA Is this handset capable of voice communication over any air interface or frequency band that does not currently have hearing aid compatibility technical standards? No This handset model was offered from: 01/11 to 12/11 M-Rating:
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/licensing/index.htm?job=const_req_by_service
                      • MHz (747-762 MHz and 777-792 MHz) and 700 MHz Guardband Provide substantial service in its licensed area by January 1, 2015, except that a licensee commencing broadcast services must submit a showing demonstrating that it is providing substantial service within 8 years of the commencement of the broadcast services. WX, WY, WZ 27.13, 27.14 601 Main Form and Schedule K 1.3 GHz (1390-1392 MHz) Provide substantial service to its licensed area within 10 years of initial license grant. BA 27.13, 27.14 601 Main Form and Schedule K 1.4 GHz (1392-1395 MHz and 1432-1434 MHz) Provide substantial service to its licensed area within 10 years of initial license grant. BB 27.13, 27.14 601 Main Form and Schedule K 1.6 GHz (1670-1675 MHz)
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/releases/da051650PublicUse.pdf
                      • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 1 Wireless Priority Service for National Security / Emergency Preparedness: Algorithms for Public Use Reservation and Network Performance Prepared for: DynCorp 15000 Conference Center Drive Chantilly, VA Prepared by: Nyquetek Inc 8397 Piping Rock Millersville, MD August 30, 2002 Version 0.9 2 Table of Contents 1. Summary.....................................................................................................................5 1.1 Purpose................................................................................................................9 1.2 Scope...................................................................................................................9 1.3 Organization of Paper.........................................................................................9 2. Problem Description.................................................................................................11 2.1 Severe Congestion............................................................................................12 2.2 NS/EP Leadership and Key Staff Traffic..........................................................12 2.3 Network Architecture........................................................................................14 2.4 WPS Queuing Features.....................................................................................16 3. Public Use Reservation Algorithms..........................................................................17 3.1 PURQ-AC Performance....................................................................................21 3.2 Public Use Reservation by Channel Allocation (PURCA)...............................24 3.3 Public Use Reservation by Preference and Limitation (PURPL).....................24 3.4 Public Use Reservation by Departure Allocation (PURDA)............................25 3.5 Public Use Reservation
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/releases/fcc00-348.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/releases/fcc00-348.pdf
                      • Public Safety Band-Spectrum & Channels Designated Purpose Amount of Spectrum Narrowband (6.25 kHz) Wideband (50 kHz) General Use 12.5 MHz (52.1 %) 7.7 MHz (1232 channels) 4.8 MHz (96 channels) Interoperability 2.6 MHz (10.8 %) 0.8 MHz (128 channels) 1.8 MHz (36 channels) State License 2.4 MHz (10.0 %) 2.4 MHz (384 channels) - 0 - Low Power 0.3 MHz (1.3 %) 0.3 MHz (48 channels) - 0 - Reserve 6.2 MHz (25.8 %) 0.8 MHz (128 channels) 5.4 MHz ( 108 channels) T O T A L 24 MHz (100 %) 12 MHz (1920 channels) 12 MHz (240 channels) GNSS Protection Criteria We adopt technical solutions to protect certain global navigation satellite systems (GNSS), particularly the Global Orbiting Navigation Satellite
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/reports/documents/avatar-migratory-bird-report10104.pdf
                      • by Avatar Environmental, LLC 107 S. Church St. West Chester, Pennsylvania 19382 EDM International, Inc. 4001 Automation Way Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 Pandion Systems, Inc 5200 NW 43rd Street Suite 102-314 Gainesville, Florida 32606 September 30, 2004 Notice Of Inquiry Comment Review i September 2004 Final TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1. INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM................................................................................1-1 1.2 OBJECTIVES...................................................................................................................1-2 1.3 GENERAL CAVEATS....................................................................................................1-2 2.TECHNICAL APPROACH ..................................................................................................2-1 2.1 COMMENT REVIEW PROCESS...................................................................................2-1 2.1.1 Review and Selection Process...............................................................................2-1 2.2 STUDY/CITATION REVIEW PROCESS......................................................................2-1 3. BIRD COLLISIONS WITH TELECOMMUNICATIONS TOWERS............................3-1 3.1 GENERAL OVERVIEW..................................................................................................3-1 3.2 REPRESENTATIVE STUDIES AND INCIDENTAL MORTALITY REPORTS .......3-4 3.2.1 Study Duration and Survey Methods.......................................................3-11 3.2.2 Survey Biases...........................................................................................3-11 3.2.3 Mass Mortalities vs. "Trickle Kills"........................................................3-13 3.2.4 Declining Mortality..................................................................................3-15 3.3 NOTICE OF INQUIRY COMMENT REVIEW AND
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/reports/documents/cmrscomp.pdf
                      • allocate more spectrum that can be used to provide CMRS.260 In March 1996, we released a Spectrum Plan indicating how we plan to make spec- trum being transferred from Federal Government use available for private sector use.261 The process of implementing this Plan is underway and, by the year 2000, could make an additional 70 megahertz of spectrum in the 1.3-1.6 GHz, and the 3.6 GHz bands available for CMRS. These additional spectrum allocations should expand the quantity, quality, and variety of wireless services, increase the number of CMRS providers and, ultimately, lead to lower prices for con- sumers. The Commission has made extensive use of its auction authority as the most efficient means of assigning this newly-allocated spectrum to providers
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/reports/documents/fc000289.pdf
                      • percent of the total U.S. population, have three or more different operators (cellular, PCS, and/or Nextel) offering mobile telephone service in the counties in which they live. However, these counties make up only 35 percent of the total land area of the United States, reflecting the nation's uneven population distribution. On the other hand, the land area of these counties, 1.3 million square miles, is roughly equal to the combined land area of the 15 members of the European Union. Over 173 million people, or 69 percent of the U.S. population, live in areas with five or more mobile telephone operators competing to offer service. And 11 million people, or 4 percent of the population, can choose from among seven different
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/reports/documents/fcc00289.doc
                      • percent of the total U.S. population, have three or more different operators (cellular, PCS, and/or Nextel) offering mobile telephone service in the counties in which they live. However, these counties make up only 35 percent of the total land area of the United States, reflecting the nation's uneven population distribution. On the other hand, the land area of these counties, 1.3 million square miles, is roughly equal to the combined land area of the 15 members of the European Union. Over 173 million people, or 69 percent of the U.S. population, live in areas with five or more mobile telephone operators competing to offer service. And 11 million people, or 4 percent of the population, can choose from among seven different
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/reports/documents/whtepapr.pdf
                      • are often interconnected, they are now regulated as commercial entities (with the onset of certain sunset provisions) as a result of the 1993 Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. The only remaining paging in the private radio services is paging for an entity's own internal communications needs. See 47 C.F.R. � 90.494. 6 identify, and monitor the movement and location of over 1.3 million rail cars and equipment throughout the United States.7 Other Private Radio Services Private Land Mobile Paging A private paging service is a paging service that is not-for-profit and that serves the licensee's internal communications needs as defined in Part 90 of the Commission's Rules. Private paging systems in general provide the same applications 8 offered by commercial paging services:
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/releases/d001033a.pdf
                      • pointed within 2 degrees ( N )Yes No of the Geostationary Satellite Arc? *If >Yes=, attach waiver request explaining circumstances . Final Receiver 21) Receiver Location Name: QUARRYHILL 22) Receiver antenna manufacturer: ANTENNA SYSTEMS CO 23) Receiver antenna model number: YZ1-23 24) Call Sign: WPNK759 25) Height to Center of RX Antenna AGL (meters): 54.9 36) RX Antenna Beamwidth (degrees): 1.3 37) RX Antenna Gain (dBi): 42.4 28) Diversity RX Antenna Height AGL 29) Diversity RX Antenna Beamwidth 30) Diversity RX Antenna Gain (dBi): 31) RX Periscope Reflector Dimensions (meters): Height: Width: 32) RX Periscope Reflector Separation (meters): FCC 601 Schedule I August 1999 - Page 3 FCC Form 601 Schedule I Supplement 2 Path Data Transmit Location 1) Transmit location
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/releases/d001033c.pdf
                      • Final Receiver 21) Receiver Location Name: PARK CIRCLE 22) Receiver antenna manufacturer: ABC RADIO COMM 23) Receiver antenna model number: ABC123 24) Call Sign: 25) Height to Center of RX Antenna AGL (meters): 59.1 36) RX Antenna Beamwidth (degrees): 1.O 37) RX Antenna Gain (dBi): 44.3 28) Diversity RX Antenna Height AGL (meters): 46.9 29) Diversity RX Antenna Beamwidth (degrees): 1.3 30) Diversity RX Antenna Gain (dBi): 42.3 31) RX Periscope Reflector Dimensions (meters): Height: Width: 32) RX Periscope Reflector Separation (meters): FCC 601 Schedule I August 1999 - Page 3 FCC Form 601 Schedule I Supplement 4 Frequency Data Transmitter Location Information 1) Transmit Location Name: KNOBHILL 2) Path Number: 1 Frequency Information 3) Action A/M/D 4) Lower or Center
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/releases/da012729.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/releases/da012729.txt
                      • a heading which reads, "Run ActiveX controls and plug-ins." Again highlight the "Enable" button. 6. Click "OK" to close the Custom Level window. 1 If you do not receive the download message, and you are experiencing problems with online filing, you may have an older, incompatible version of the Java Plug-in installed on your computer. (The current version is V. 1.3.0_02.) Please uninstall the older version. Go to Start>Settings>Control Panel>Add/Remove Programs. Select "Java2 Runtime Environment Standard Edition" from the list, and click Add/Remove. Once the old Java Plug-in is uninstalled, restart your machine and proceed to ULS and ASR. Download the new Java Plug-in when prompted. 3 7. Click "OK" to close the Internet Options window. For more information, contact ULS
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/releases/da980827.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/releases/da980827.pdf
                      • Extension Of Time, filed by the Federal Communications Bar Association on April 29, 1998, IS GRANTED. Comments are due on or before May 22, 1998. Reply comments are due on or before June 8, 1998. 7. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 4(i) and 5 of the Communications Act 154(i); 155, authority delegated by section 0.331 of the Commission's 1.3, that sections 1.49(a); 1.415; 1.419, ARE hereby WAIVED to the extent described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Steven E. Weingarten Chief, Commercial Wireless Division q � q � � '' � �
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/weeklypn/2011/DOC-304028A1.pdf
                      • 118-21-42.5 W 0004560856 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILos Angeles 01/05/2011 22125.00000 34-04-23.5 N CA MD WQLP382 118-21-42.5 W 0004560856 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILos Angeles 01/05/2011 22175.00000 34-04-23.5 N CA MD WQLP382 118-21-42.5 W 0004560856 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILos Angeles 01/05/2011 22225.00000 34-04-23.5 N CA MD WQLP382 118-21-42.5 W 0004560856 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIILos Angeles 01/05/2011 22275.00000 34-04-23.5 N CA MD WQMH272 117-46-01.3 W 0004560859 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIPomona 01/05/2011 21925.00000 34-04-05.2 N CA MD WQMH272 117-46-01.3 W 0004560859 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIPomona 01/05/2011 22075.00000 34-04-05.2 N CA MD WQMH396 118-23-38.7 W 0004560860 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIManhattan Beach 01/05/2011 10775.00000 33-53-22.0 N CA MD WQMH396 118-23-38.7 W 0004560860 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIIManhattan Beach 01/05/2011 23125.00000 33-53-22.0 N CA MD WQMH809 118-13-16.8 W 0004560861
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/weeklypn/2011/DOC-304247A1.pdf
                      • 0004575764 TEXAS ELECTRONIC TRANSPORT COMD HANIS 01/18/2011 06152.75000 29-18-48.8 N TX RM KLR38 099-16-04.1 W 0004575764 TEXAS ELECTRONIC TRANSPORT COMD HANIS 01/18/2011 06226.89000 29-18-48.8 N WI RM WPNG601 091-23-45.2 W 0004575789 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC ALTOONA 01/18/2011 02162.00000 44-46-44.1 N WI RM WPNG601 091-23-45.2 W 0004575789 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC ALTOONA 01/18/2011 06760.00000 44-46-44.1 N HI RM WLN238 158-00-01.3 W 0004576702 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCKOOLAULOA 01/18/2011 06850.00000 21-39-52.5 N MA RM WPJD813 071-17-54.9 W 0004577051 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC WELLESLEY 01/18/2011 10628.75000 42-17-34.9 N CO RM WMN807 104-46-11.5 W 0004577538 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC WALSENBURG 01/18/2011 06197.24000 37-38-32.2 N CO RM WMN807 104-46-11.5 W 0004577538 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC WALSENBURG 01/18/2011 06256.54000 37-38-32.2 N WY
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/weeklypn/2011/DOC-304388A1.pdf
                      • PARTNERS SPECHalawa 01/24/2011 10775.00000 21-21-56.4 N HI MD WQLB220 157-56-10.9 W 0004585102 CLEARWIRE HAWAII PARTNERS SPECHalawa 01/24/2011 10935.00000 21-21-56.4 N HI MD WQLB220 157-56-10.9 W 0004585102 CLEARWIRE HAWAII PARTNERS SPECHalawa 01/24/2011 23025.00000 21-21-56.4 N HI MD WQLB220 157-56-10.9 W 0004585102 CLEARWIRE HAWAII PARTNERS SPECHalawa 01/24/2011 23275.00000 21-21-56.4 N HI MD WQMG388 157-53-18.6 W 0004585103 CLEARWIRE HAWAII PARTNERS SPECHonolulu 01/24/2011 21975.00000 21-21-01.3 N HI MD WQKU949 157-53-02.4 W 0004585104 CLEARWIRE HAWAII PARTNERS SPECHonolulu 01/24/2011 17915.00000 21-20-11.0 N HI MD WQKU949 157-53-02.4 W 0004585104 CLEARWIRE HAWAII PARTNERS SPECHonolulu 01/24/2011 17965.00000 21-20-11.0 N HI MD WQKU949 157-53-02.4 W 0004585104 CLEARWIRE HAWAII PARTNERS SPECHonolulu 01/24/2011 18065.00000 21-20-11.0 N HI MD WQKU949 157-53-02.4 W 0004585104 CLEARWIRE HAWAII PARTNERS SPECHonolulu 01/24/2011 21825.00000 21-20-11.0 N HI MD WQKU949
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/weeklypn/2011/DOC-304657A1.pdf
                      • Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City ME MD KNKA708 069-44-31.0 W 0004609953 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCHARRINGTON 02/10/2011 43-48-31.1 N ME MD KNKA708 070-16-53.0 W 0004609953 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCNew Gloucester 02/10/2011 43-59-54.3 N ME MD KNKA708 070-17-44.2 W 0004609953 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCNEW GLOUCESTER 02/10/2011 43-57-01.3 N ME MD KNKA708 069-49-40.2 W 0004609953 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCPHIPPSBURG 02/10/2011 43-50-01.8 N ME MD KNKA708 070-15-49.2 W 0004609953 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCPORTLAND 02/10/2011 43-39-17.3 N ME MD KNKA708 070-18-19.2 W 0004609953 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCPORTLAND 02/10/2011 43-43-00.3 N ME MD KNKA708 070-19-53.2 W 0004609953 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLCSOUTH PORTLAND 02/10/2011 43-37-28.3 N ME MD
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/weeklypn/2011/DOC-304911A1.pdf
                      • WQCS504 121-53-21.2 W 0004630631 The Internet Connection Inc D/B/A got.netSan Jose 02/24/2011 21985.00000 37-20-01.5 N CA MD WQCS899 122-01-53.0 W 0004631108 The Internet Connection Inc D/B/A got.netSanta Cruz 02/25/2011 11445.00000 36-58-57.5 N KY NE 084-33-40.6 W 0004623639 QX Networking and Design, Inc. Nicholasville 02/22/2011 19360.00000 37-54-36.3 N KY NE 084-33-01.2 W 0004623640 QX Networking and Design, Inc. Lexington-Fayette 02/22/2011 23275.00000 38-01-01.3 N Page 42 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City IL NE 087-52-31.2 W 0004623828 MPX, INC. Deerfield 02/22/2011 23285.00000 42-09-45.3 N IL NE 087-52-30.4 W 0004623829 MPX, INC. Northbrook 02/22/2011 22085.00000 42-08-57.1 N TX NE 097-33-29.2 W 0004623837 Wireless Infrastructure Partners, LLC Boyd 02/22/2011
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/weeklypn/2011/DOC-305045A1.pdf
                      • MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City IN NE 086-06-34.9 W 0004632388 EMERGENCY RADIO SERVICE, INC. Kokomo 02/28/2011 19375.00000 40-29-52.1 N TX NE 094-06-04.6 W 0004632746 Wireless Infrastructure Partners, LLC LEIGH 02/28/2011 10855.00000 32-36-14.2 N ID NE 113-37-26.5 W 0004632755 Safelink Internet Albion 02/28/2011 19525.00000 42-26-01.3 N ID NE 116-34-27.0 W 0004632758 Safelink Internet Nampa 02/28/2011 19325.00000 43-36-21.5 N ID NE 116-34-27.0 W 0004632758 Safelink Internet Nampa 02/28/2011 19425.00000 43-36-21.5 N ID NE 116-48-40.8 W 0004632759 Safelink Internet Caldwell 02/28/2011 17765.00000 43-36-29.9 N ID NE 116-55-43.7 W 0004632761 Safelink Internet Parma 02/28/2011 17865.00000 43-49-29.3 N MI NE 083-13-48.8 W 0004632920 Detroit Edison Company Detroit 02/28/2011 00928.35625
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/weeklypn/2011/DOC-305322A1.pdf
                      • 03/17/2011 10795.00000 34-34-48.0 N AZ NE 110-27-37.3 W 0004656396 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Benson 03/17/2011 10632.50000 31-58-49.0 N AZ NE 110-23-55.2 W 0004656403 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Benson 03/17/2011 10567.50000 31-57-37.9 N VA NE 077-23-48.8 W 0004656431 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Richmond 03/17/2011 23380.00000 37-34-52.7 N VA NE 077-24-41.8 W 0004656433 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Richmond 03/17/2011 23310.00000 37-35-01.3 N VA NE 077-20-16.5 W 0004656486 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. Mechanicsville 03/17/2011 22680.00000 37-36-53.1 N AL NE 088-07-07.8 W 0004656677 ALLTEL Communications, LLC Alabama Port 03/18/2011 06286.19000 30-21-25.9 N AL NE 088-07-07.8 W 0004656677 ALLTEL Communications, LLC Alabama Port 03/18/2011 06315.84000 30-21-25.9 N VA NE 076-23-59.2 W 0004657135 Telecom Transport Management, Inc. HAMPTON 03/18/2011 17790.00000 37-00-42.1 N VA NE 076-25-19.9
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/weeklypn/2011/DOC-305453A1.pdf
                      • E 03/22/2011 03650.00000 - 03700.00000 NE 0004660585 SyncWave, LLC 03/22/2011 03650.00000 - 03700.00000 NE 0004662564 Board of Water Electric & Communication 03/23/2011 03650.00000 - 03700.00000 Page 52 RP - Broadcast Auxiliary Remote Pickup State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NY NE 073-42-01.8 W 0004659764 WMHT EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICTroy 03/21/2011 00161.70000 42-41-01.3 N NY NE 073-42-01.8 W 0004659764 WMHT EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICTroy 03/21/2011 00161.76000 42-41-01.3 N TI - TV Intercity Relay State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OR AM WPNI848 123-08-33.3 W 0004530991 CALIFORNIA OREGON BROADCASTINGSALEM 03/23/2011 06950.00000 - 06975.00000 44-58-39.4 N OR AM WPJC665 123-03-43.3 W 0004531894 CALIFORNIA OREGON BROADCASTINGEugene 03/23/2011
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/weeklypn/2011/DOC-305717A1.pdf
                      • Lakes 04/05/2011 13100.00000 - 13125.00000 45-07-40.8 N MN NE 093-08-22.0 W 0004679273 CBS BROADCASTING INC. SHOREVIEW 04/05/2011 13200.00000 - 13225.00000 45-03-44.0 N Page 53 TP - TV Pickup State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City IL MD KB55028 P 087-37-45.5 W 0004681339 CBS BROADCASTING INC. CHICAGO 04/06/2011 02025.00000 - 02025.50000 41-53-01.3 N IL MD KB55028 P 087-37-45.5 W 0004681339 CBS BROADCASTING INC. CHICAGO 04/06/2011 02025.50000 - 02109.50000 41-53-01.3 N IL MD KB55028 P 087-37-45.5 W 0004681339 CBS BROADCASTING INC. CHICAGO 04/06/2011 02109.50000 - 02110.00000 41-53-01.3 N IL MD KB55028 P 087-37-45.5 W 0004681339 CBS BROADCASTING INC. CHICAGO 04/06/2011 02450.00000 - 02467.00000 41-53-01.3 N IL MD KB55028 P 087-37-45.5 W 0004681339 CBS
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/weeklypn/2011/DOC-305954A1.pdf
                      • Name Latitude City UT MD WQKT418 111-40-38.9 W 0004687782 DIGIS LLC OREM 04/12/2011 18015.00000 40-15-50.2 N UT MD WQMG532 111-59-49.6 W 0004687785 Digis LLC Eagle Mountain 04/12/2011 17865.00000 40-21-33.7 N UT MD WQMG532 111-59-49.6 W 0004687785 Digis LLC Eagle Mountain 04/12/2011 18015.00000 40-21-33.7 N UT MD WQKT419 111-38-32.2 W 0004687792 DIGIS LLC PROVO 04/12/2011 19475.00000 40-18-00.8 N UT MD WQNP265 111-44-01.3 W 0004687800 Digis LLC Orem 04/12/2011 18115.00000 40-16-37.2 N AZ MD WQJY482 111-51-22.9 W 0004688102 Bluewire LLC Mesa 04/12/2011 17760.00000 33-23-33.3 N IL MD WQGW739 087-37-07.4 W 0004688132 Towerstream Corp. Chicago 04/12/2011 21875.00000 41-51-14.8 N IL MD WQLB324 087-52-30.9 W 0004688750 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIINorthbrook 04/13/2011 11225.00000 42-06-52.7 N IL MD WQLB324 087-52-30.9 W 0004688750 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS IIINorthbrook 04/13/2011
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/weeklypn/2011/DOC-306105A1.pdf
                      • Wireless (VAW) LLC Santa Fe 04/18/2011 35-41-17.1 N OK MD KNKA614 094-34-39.0 W 0004698080 Alltel Communications, LLC HEAVENER 04/20/2011 34-53-44.1 N FL MD KNKA595 082-08-13.8 W 0004698411 ALLTEL WIRELESS HOLDINGS, LLC Bokeelia 04/20/2011 26-41-24.9 N Page 22 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City FL MD KNKA595 081-57-01.3 W 0004698411 ALLTEL WIRELESS HOLDINGS, LLC Cape Coral 04/20/2011 26-38-03.3 N FL MD KNKA595 082-18-37.3 W 0004698411 ALLTEL WIRELESS HOLDINGS, LLC GROVE 04/20/2011 26-53-54.2 N CA MD KNKA209 117-34-33.4 W 0004699017 Los Angeles SMSA Limited PartnershipPhelan 04/21/2011 34-23-33.8 N MO MD KNKN553 094-18-36.5 W 0004699910 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Albany 04/21/2011 40-15-41.5 N MO MD KNKN553 095-04-52.7 W 0004699910
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/weeklypn/2011/DOC-306296A1.pdf
                      • Inc. Chester 04/25/2011 19380.00000 35-27-56.8 N TN NE 088-32-28.9 W 0004703856 NTCH-West Tenn, Inc. Chester 04/25/2011 19460.00000 35-27-56.8 N TN NE 088-23-44.0 W 0004703882 NTCH-West Tenn, Inc. Adamsville 04/25/2011 17980.00000 35-14-43.2 N TN NE 088-47-25.2 W 0004703890 NTCH-West Tenn, Inc. Jackson 04/25/2011 19460.00000 35-32-06.9 N TN NE 088-47-25.2 W 0004703890 NTCH-West Tenn, Inc. Jackson 04/25/2011 19540.00000 35-32-06.9 N FL NE 085-18-01.3 W 0004703968 Main Street Boadband LLC Port St. Joe 04/26/2011 10795.00000 29-48-42.5 N TN NE 088-48-39.7 W 0004704624 NTCH-West Tenn, Inc. Jackson 04/26/2011 17900.00000 35-33-47.6 N NY NE 073-48-58.5 W 0004707150 Jamaica Hospital Medical Center Jamaica 04/27/2011 17815.00000 40-42-01.2 N CO NE 108-19-04.6 W 0004707268 Xcel Energy Services Inc. Palisade 04/27/2011 06171.87500 39-08-53.6 N TX NE 097-47-05.0 W 0004708991 UNION
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/weeklypn/2011/DOC-306419A1.pdf
                      • LLC Rainsville 05/04/2011 35-59-44.7 N NM AM WQJE415 105-33-03.6 W 0004662674 Excomm, LLC Sipapu 05/04/2011 36-09-23.6 N MI MD KNKA506 086-23-20.1 W 0004712340 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Hart 05/02/2011 43-38-56.7 N MI MD KNKA506 086-22-14.4 W 0004712340 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Hart 05/02/2011 43-40-55.1 N MI MD KNKA506 086-22-59.4 W 0004712340 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Hart 05/02/2011 43-45-01.3 N MI MD KNKA506 086-22-46.4 W 0004712340 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC HART 05/02/2011 43-39-42.7 N MI MD KNKA506 086-02-41.5 W 0004712340 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Holton 05/02/2011 43-28-49.6 N MI MD KNKA506 086-11-07.0 W 0004712340 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Muskegon 05/02/2011 43-09-19.0 N MI MD KNKA506 086-15-46.5 W 0004712340 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Muskegon 05/02/2011 43-09-56.1
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/weeklypn/2011/DOC-306653A1.pdf
                      • MD WPJE272 117-28-31.2 W 0004723263 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership Fontana 05/10/2011 11645.00000 34-09-10.0 N CA MD WMG849 117-06-49.1 W 0004723264 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership Yucaipa 05/10/2011 10557.50000 34-01-32.0 N CA MD WMG849 117-06-49.1 W 0004723264 Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership Yucaipa 05/10/2011 11365.00000 34-01-32.0 N AL MD WLU643 086-30-15.9 W 0004723392 Alltel Communications, LLC WHITE CITY 05/10/2011 05945.20000 32-38-01.3 N AL MD WLU643 086-30-15.9 W 0004723392 Alltel Communications, LLC WHITE CITY 05/10/2011 06034.15000 32-38-01.3 N AL MD WLU643 086-30-15.9 W 0004723392 Alltel Communications, LLC WHITE CITY 05/10/2011 06063.80000 32-38-01.3 N PR MD WPSN612 066-15-38.4 W 0004723394 PR Wireless, Inc. ALBONITO 05/10/2011 06197.24000 18-07-28.4 N PR MD WPSN612 066-15-38.4 W 0004723394 PR Wireless, Inc. ALBONITO 05/10/2011 06286.19000 18-07-28.4 N PR
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/weeklypn/2011/DOC-306919A1.pdf
                      • Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NV NE 115-18-28.1 W 0004742335 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC LAS VEGAS 05/25/2011 17760.00000 36-07-11.4 N NV NE 115-19-44.3 W 0004742339 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC LAS VEGAS 05/25/2011 19320.00000 36-07-19.1 N AZ NE 114-35-28.3 W 0004742352 T-MOBILE LICENSE LLC Bullhead City 05/25/2011 19400.00000 35-05-44.9 N TN NE 086-52-57.0 W 0004742357 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC LEWISBURG 05/25/2011 11325.00000 35-24-01.3 N TN NE 086-53-08.5 W 0004742364 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC Mooresville 05/25/2011 10755.00000 35-28-31.7 N TN NE 086-53-08.5 W 0004742364 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC Mooresville 05/25/2011 10835.00000 35-28-31.7 N TN NE 086-53-45.0 W 0004742370 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC COLUMBIA 05/25/2011 11245.00000 35-31-51.3 N TN NE 086-53-45.0 W 0004742370 Conterra Ultra Broadband LLC COLUMBIA 05/25/2011 11285.00000 35-31-51.3 N TN NE 087-02-16.6
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/weeklypn/2011/DOC-307209A1.pdf
                      • 0004614457 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Tolar 06/01/2011 32-21-43.1 N TX AM KNKN457 097-28-40.9 W 0004614457 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Valley Mills 06/01/2011 31-39-21.2 N TX AM KNKN457 099-55-49.5 W 0004614457 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Winters 06/01/2011 31-57-05.9 N GA MD KNKA579 081-15-31.4 W 0004747581 Verizon Wireless of the East LP KELLER 05/31/2011 31-50-53.5 N GA MD KNKA579 081-06-01.3 W 0004747581 Verizon Wireless of the East LP SAVANNAH 05/31/2011 31-57-19.7 N TX MD KNKA221 095-31-01.1 W 0004747934 GTE MOBILNET OF SOUTH TEXAS LIMIBrazoria 05/31/2011 28-59-01.9 N MD MD KNKA779 077-36-25.0 W 0004750648 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC BOONSBORO 06/02/2011 39-32-26.0 N MD MD KNKA779 077-58-07.7 W 0004750648 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC CLEAR SPRING 06/02/2011 39-38-49.2 N MD MD
                    • http://wireless.fcc.gov/weeklypn/2011/DOC-308228A1.pdf
                      • 10795.00000 38-28-11.0 N WV NE 081-29-41.2 W 0004782111 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Pinch 06/27/2011 10745.00000 38-24-38.4 N NY NE 073-42-50.0 W 0004782206 Goosetown Network Services, LLC QUEENS 06/27/2011 10755.00000 40-45-26.0 N TX NE 097-26-10.3 W 0004783937 AirCanopy Internet Services Joshua 06/28/2011 10775.00000 32-26-26.4 N TX NE 097-11-49.2 W 0004783939 AirCanopy Internet Services Alvarado 06/28/2011 18015.00000 32-28-02.9 N TX NE 097-10-01.3 W 0004783940 AirCanopy Internet Services Alvarado 06/28/2011 10775.00000 32-30-57.4 N Page 19 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TX NE 097-14-37.5 W 0004783941 AirCanopy Internet Services Fort Worth 06/28/2011 11265.00000 32-35-23.5 N TX NE 097-14-37.5 W 0004783941 AirCanopy Internet Services
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/3G/3G_appendices.doc http://www.fcc.gov/3G/3G_appendices.pdf
                      • the benefits of this third generation of wireless products and services. In less than 20 years, the U.S. wireless industry has blossomed from virtually nothing to one with 100 million subscribers, and it continues to grow at a rate of 25 to 30 percent annually. Globally, there are over 470 million wireless subscribers, a number expected to grow to approximately 1.3 billion within the next 5 years. It is an industry in which U.S. companies have developed the leading technologies for current and future systems. It is an industry whose products help people throughout the world communicate better and in more places, saving time, money, and lives. Many saw the first generation of wireless -- cell phones -- as an extravagant
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/3G/3gfinalreport.doc http://www.fcc.gov/3G/3gfinalreport.pdf
                      • 3750 125 -90 161 16 1.6 0.02 W-CDMA 27 5000 125 -90 161 16 1.6 0.02 TDMA 27 30 125 -90 100 10 1.0 0.02 TDMA 27 200 125 -90 161 16 1.6 0.02 CDMA 27 1250 Response Station 6000 -67 6.4 0.6 0.06 0.00 CDMA 27 3750 6000 -67 11.3 1.1 0.11 0.00 W-CDMA 27 5000 6000 -67 12.9 1.3 0.13 0.00 TDMA 27 30 6000 -67 1.6 0.2 0.02 0.00 TDMA 27 200 6000 -67 3.2 0.3 0.03 0.00 Table 5.2 also shows that only 2 megahertz of guard band is need to account for the 3G system energy that overlaps the ITFS/MDS channel. Therefore, the energy in the adjacent channel is the limiting factor in this case. We
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/3G/3gfinalreportappendices.doc http://www.fcc.gov/3G/3gfinalreportappendices.pdf
                      • the benefits of this third generation of wireless products and services. In less than 20 years, the U.S. wireless industry has blossomed from virtually nothing to one with 100 million subscribers, and it continues to grow at a rate of 25 to 30 percent annually. Globally, there are over 470 million wireless subscribers, a number expected to grow to approximately 1.3 billion within the next 5 years. It is an industry in which U.S. companies have developed the leading technologies for current and future systems. It is an industry whose products help people throughout the world communicate better and in more places, saving time, money, and lives. Many saw the first generation of wireless -- cell phones -- as an extravagant
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1999/fcc99024.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1999/fcc99024.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1999/fcc99024.wp
                      • customers obtain a higher(c)quality connection at speeds up to 128 kbps using Integrated �Services Digital Network ("ISDN") services sold by LECs. ISDN services can be used to connect with �AT&T is the largest provider of residential Internet access service that does not bundle � (press release), Jan. 22, 1999. AT&T's WorldNet dial(c)up service is the �number two online service, with 1.3 million residential customers as compared with America Online's 15 million �total customers. AT&T is considering selling WorldNet to @Home Corp. in exchange for $1 billion in @Home � �TCI does not provide dial(c)up Internet access service. MCI(c)WorldCom is the leading provider of the ԍThe facilities used by dial(c)up Internet access providers include the servers and connections to local exchange �and
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da000499.doc
                      • that the time for reconsideration has long passed. Further, WTXL-TV maintains that there is no basis for Time Warner's concern that carriage of WTXL-TV will cause harm to the system particularly since previous retransmission consent agreements between WTXL-TV and Time Warner indicated the system's willingness to carry two ABC affiliates. Finally, WTXL-TV argues that waiver would be appropriate because Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules authorizes the agency to waive its rules ``at any time'' for ``good cause.'' WTXL-TV maintains that a waiver is particularly appropriate here because had the Bureau had the current facts before it at the time of the Diversified decision it would have reached a different conclusion. We do not agree with the arguments raised by WTXL-TV
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da000903.doc
                      • conducted during the weeks of June 10-16, and September 16-22, 1998, and the second year's surveys during the weeks of June 9-15, and September 15-21, 1999. The results of the VPI survey submitted by KAAL are as follows: Survey Households Share Standard Net Standard Year Studied Viewing Error Weekly Error Hours Circulation 1998 191 3.6 1.4 14.8 3.4 1999 183 1.3 1.0 11.5 3.4 As a result, KAAL requests that the Commission grant its petition so that it can assert its network nonduplication and syndicated exclusivity rights in the subject communities. In opposition, KSTP-TV and Bresnan argue that KAAL's petition should be denied because KSTP-TV continues to receive a significant level of over-the-air viewership in the communities. The parties point out
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da001870.doc
                      • at 7602. Comments in support of the petitions were filed by the National Cable Television Association (``NCTA''). Comments in opposition were filed by Circuit City Stores, Inc. (``Circuit City'') and the Consumer Electronics Associaton (``CEA''). Charter Communications et al., Order, DA 00-1483 (Cable Service Bureau June 30, 2000). FPC v. Texaco Inc., 377 U.S. 33, 39 (1964). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Pikes Peak Broadcasting v. FCC, 422 F2d 671, 682 (D.C.Cir 1969). Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe, 401 U.S. 402, 416 (1971). See e.g., Charter Petition at 2 In support of this contention, NCTA cites the responses to a CableLabs request for information to which no company indicated an intention to build analog PODs or host hybrid devices
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/fcc00202.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/fcc00202.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/fcc00202.txt
                      • 9 (1995) (entity to purchase discount airline tickets on behalf of a group of corporations); IFA Shippers' Ass'n, 1990 DOJBRL LEXIS 2 (1990) (shippers form group to purchase volume discounts from ocean carriers); Utilities Service Alliance, 1996 DOJBRL LEXIS 4 (1996) (electric power utilities form alliance to purchase resources). Applicants Dec. 21 Ownership Reply Comments at 35. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co., LP v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1165 (D.C. Cir. 1990); United States v. Storer Broadcasting Co., 351 U.S. 192, 205 (1956). WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972). Attribution Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 19029-19031 �� 33-37 (rejecting commenters' ``day-to-day control'' arguments). See Letter from Mark
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc98335.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc98335.txt
                      • and Subscriber Size of Major Cable System Clusters (Cumulative Figures) Range of Clustered Subscribers (thousands) 1994 1995 1996 1997 Clusters Subs. (millions) Clusters Subs. (millions) Clusters Subs. (millions) Clusters Subs. (millions) 100-199 58 8.0 76 10.4 76 10.3 49 6.7 200-299 26 6.0 35 8.4 34 8.3 33 8.2 300-399 6 2.0 8 2.8 11 3.7 11 3.8 400-499 3 1.3 10 4.5 8 3.6 8 3.7 > 500 4 2.8 8 5.1 10 7.7 16 11.9 Total 97 20.1 137 31.2 139 33.6 117 34.3 Sources: Paul Kagan Associates, Inc., Major Cable TV Systems/Clusters, The Cable TV Financial Databook, 1995, at 38-39; 1996, at 38-40; 1997, at 39-41; 1998, at 38-42. Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-335 1MSO subscriber totals as
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Comments/access_reform/samples/MCICOM.htm
                      • strategic investment in plant in preparation for LEC entry into video and long distance markets.[107]^(107) Research submitted by MCI in the Local Competition Proceeding showed that approximately $.21 billion of the gap can be attributed to under-depreciation.[108]^(108) Table V-1 summarizes the sources to which the gap is attributed: Table V-1 Sources of the Gap Source Annual Revenue ($Billion) Universal Service 1.3 Excess Profits 1.7 Overbuilt Plant 3.2 Depreciation Reserve Deficit .2 Residual/Operational Inefficiencies 5.2 Total Gap 11.6 Under-depreciation accounts for approximately 2 percent ($.2 billion) of the difference between existing interstate access revenues and the economic cost of interstate access services. LECs' claims that Commission-prescribed depreciation rates are too low and have overvalued their assets have not withstood serious scrutiny.[109]^(109) The
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Comments/cc96152.html
                      • Docket No. 96-152, FCC 96-310 [ [1]Text Format | [2]Wordperfect Format ] __________________________________________________________________ Comments, September 4, 1996 16 out of a total of 20 comments were filed electronically with the FCC for this proceeding and are provided here in one zip file, [3]cc96152.zip, for easy downloading. The zip file is approximately 200KB in size and contains 18 files that occupy 1.3MB when unzipped. See the [4]Table below for the names of the parties who submitted disks and their associated files. __________________________________________________________________ To download a zip file: click on one of the highlighted file names above, then use your browser's normal save function to save the zip file to your computer. Once it's on your system, use an [5]unzip program to unzip
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/News_Releases/2000/nrcc0002.pdf
                      • to Table 3.1 of the Monitoring Report for more details on the percentage of additional allocations of NTS costs to the interstate jurisdiction. 12 Administrative expenses and interest earnings of the administrator have been ignored in determining total contributions necessary to support the HCL mechanism. This same assumption also applies to LTS, LSS and low-income support funding estimates in Tables 1.3 � 1.9. 5 companies in the pool. The amount of LTS that a NECA pool member is eligible to receive in 1999 is the 1997 level of LTS (the difference between the 1997 CCL revenue requirements and the sum of 1997 CCL revenues using the NECA pool rate and 1997 subscriber line charge revenues) multiplied by the rate of growth
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1995/fcc95419.html
                      • and/or resolving all trouble reports related to an 800 service for which it is identified as the RespOrg in the SMS/800 database. Such troubleshooting responsibilities include providing around the clock contact numbers for receiving subscriber trouble reports and advising its subscriber and the affected 800 Service Provider of the status of service during resolution of an 800 problem. Id. at 1.3. Footnote 20 Prior to 1986, AT&T was the only IXC capable of completing 800 calls. In May 1993, when 800 number portability was first offered, there were approximately three million 800 numbers assigned to various IXCs, with most of these numbers being assigned to AT&T. By July 1, 1995, over seven million 800 numbers were assigned. Footnote 21 Letter from
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98118.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98118.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98118.wp
                      • a thorough history of the Computer III proceeding, see Computer III Further Notice, supra, n.14, �� 9-16. Given the on-going Computer III Further Remand proceedings, as noted above, we direct parties to raise general comments about the Commission's regulatory framework for BOC provision of information services in that docket. 24 47 C.F.R. � 5.01 et seq. 25 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (authorizing the Commission to issue waivers "for good cause shown"). 6 technology and on whether affirmative steps are necessary to further encourage and facilitate testing by removing regulatory barriers to such testing. We believe that the Commission's regulatory processes should not unduly impede experiments in new technology, and we ask commenters in this proceeding to discuss fully how current Commission
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98187.pdf
                      • to Amend Parts 1, 2, 21, & 25 of the Commission's Rules to Designate the 27.5- 29.5 GHz Frequency Band, to Re-Allocate the 29.5-30.0 GHz Frequency Band, to Establish Rules & Policies for Local Multipoint Distribution Service & for Fixed Satellite Services, Second Report & Order, Order on Reconsideration, & Fifth Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 12 FCC Rcd 12545 (1997) (1.3 GHz at 27.5-28.35 GHz, 29.1-29.25 GHz, and 31.0-31.3 GHz for virtually any service), aff'd, Melcher v. FCC, 134 F.3d 1143 (D.C. Cir. 1998). 42 See, e.g., Fred Dawson, WinStar to Deploy Point-to-Multipoint Network, MULTICHANNEL NEWS, Nov. 3, 1997, available at 1997 WL 8742459; John T. Mulqueen, Winstar to Expand Long Distance, Internet & Wireless Services, COMM. WEEK, Sept. 15, 1997,
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99122.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99122.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99122.wp
                      • code sharing between service providers. NANC Report at � 1.10. 177 NANC Report at �� 1.5.1 and 1.10.2; ALTS comments at 7; GTE comments at 8-9; PrimeCo comments at 3-4; Sprint comments at summary iv. 178 NANC Report at �� 1.1 and 1.10; NASUCA comments at 4; RCN comments at 2; Vanguard comments at 2. 179 NANC Report at � 1.3. See also ALTS comments at 7; MediaOne comments at 5; U S West comments at 27. Because rate centers are regulated by states, rate center consolidation requires state regulatory approval. NANC Report at � 1.10.1. 180 SBC comments at 29. 49 113.Rate center consolidation is the combining or aggregating of several existing rate centers into fewer rate centers.175 Rate center
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99204.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99204.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99204.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99204.wp
                      • Letter from Patricia Taylor, ORHP/HHS, to John Clark, FCC, dated May 2, 1997 (ORHP/HHS May 2 ex parte). 13 C.F.R.� 121.201, SIC 8060. See paras. 63-65 See paras. 66-67. See paras. 71-72. See paras. 118-120. See paras. 121-122. See paras. 128-133. See para. 95. See para. 123. See paras. 124-127. See 47 C.F.R. �54.705. See para. 95. See 47 C.F.R. �1.3 Texas Office of Public Utility Counsel, et al., v. FCC, United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, No. 97-60421, rel. July 30, 1999. Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-204 Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-204 a � a � @ A [ \ ] _ ` `` '' (R) � � � � � � � j� � �0� �
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99235.doc
                      • and the portion of local switching reallocated pursuant to paragraph 3.2. Price Cap CMT Revenue includes marketing expenses presently collected pursuant to FCC rule 69.156(a), and residual interconnection charge revenues collected through PICC charges, but it does not include the current recovery of incumbent LEC universal service contributions that are first removed from existing price cap baskets pursuant to paragraph 1.3. Average Price Cap CMT Revenue Per Line. The Average Price Cap CMT Revenue Per Line is Price Cap CMT Revenue per month as of December 31, 1999 using base period demand, divided by the base period demand number of lines as of December 31, 1999. In filing entities with multiple study areas, if it becomes necessary to calculate the Price
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99379.doc
                      • was 20%, up from 17% in the fourth quarter of 1998, and from 8% in the third quarter of 1997. 23. Finally, the potential of ILECs' competitors to gain market share in the future also can be assessed by information about the build-out of their own facilities. The Local Competition Report estimates that the competitive access providers' fiber grew from 1.3 million fiber miles in 1996 to 1.8 million fiber miles in 1997 to 3.1 million fiber miles in 1998. Over this same time period, the ILECs increased their fiber from 12.3 million fiber miles to 16.1 million fiber miles. At the end of 1998, therefore, competitors had at least 16% of the total fiber-optic system capacity potentially available to carry
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2000/fcc00119.doc
                      • Order at paras. 24 - 35. The waiver process contemplates that in particular circumstances there may be public interest justification for granting relief to an entity from full application of a Commission policy or rule. As provided under our rules, a deviation from strict application of the Commission rules may be permitted for good cause shown. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. The Commission may grant a waiver where special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, such deviation serves the public interest, and the waiver is consistent with the principles underlying the rule. See United States Telephone Association Petition for Waiver of Part 32 of the Commission's Rules, Order, 13 FCC Rcd 214 (Com. Car. Bur. 1997) (citing Northeast Cellular
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1996/fcc96325.pdf
                      • Commission comments at 2-3; Ohio Commission comments at 4-5; accord NYNEX reply at 4. 76 Ohio Commission comments at 4-5; accord NARUC comments at 6-7. 77 Ohio Commission comments at 4-5. 78 47 U.S.C. � 252(a) (parties may negotiate and enter into a binding agreement without regard to standards set forth 79 in sections 251(b) and (c)). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. 80 35 showing of need. The Ohio and Florida Commissions recommend that the FCC adopt explicit 75 requirements that states could choose to adopt, but that states would have the option of developing their own requirements. Under the proposal recommended by the Ohio Commission, existing state 76 regulations that are consistent with the 1996 Act would be "grandfathered." In addition,
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/da971728.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/da971728.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/da971728.wp
                      • ATU regarding 11(b)). On or before November 15, 1997, PRTC and ATU must submit complete responses to question 2. V. ORDERING CLAUSES 17. Accordingly, pursuant to Sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202, 218-220, 254, and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, 218-220, 254, and 403, and Sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, IT IS ORDERED that the United States Telephone Association's Request for Extension of Time to File Data, on behalf of the RHCs, GTE, and Sprint, IS GRANTED to the extent described herein and otherwise IS DENIED. 18. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202, 218-220,
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97074.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97074.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97074.wp
                      • Time Warner Ex Parte Presentation at 2, CC Docket No. 95-116, filed Dec. 10, 1996 (Time Warner 66 December 10, 1996 Ex Parte Filing). See supra note 40. 67 AT&T October 29, 1996 Ex Parte Filing at 8; MCI Opposition at 9. 68 See, e.g., Pacific Reply at 6 (a ported call utilizing QOR will have post-dial delay of approximately 1.3 69 seconds); but see MCI Opposition at 9-10 (post-dial delay associated with QOR is 1.7 seconds or more). AT&T and Sprint dispute the claim that the post-dial delay is imperceptible to customers, arguing there is 70 no record evidence to support this claim. AT&T Opposition at 12; Sprint Opposition at 4. See, e.g., AT&T Ex Parte Letter at 2, from
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97298.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97298.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97298.wp
                      • TCG for purposes of satisfying section 271(c)(1)(A), we will focus in this section only on the record evidence concerning these carriers' activities in Michigan. We conclude below that Ameritech has demonstrated that it complies with section 271(c)(1)(A). Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-298 Ameritech Application at 7; Michigan Commission Consultation at 5. 133 Ameritech Application at 5; see also id., Vol. 1.3, Interconnection Agreement between Brooks Fiber 134 Communications of Michigan, Inc. and Ameritech Michigan (Brooks Fiber Interconnection Agreement); id., Vol. 1.4, Interconnection Agreement between MFS Intelenet of Michigan, Inc. and Ameritech Michigan (MFS WorldCom Interconnection Agreement); id., Vol. 1.6, Interconnection Agreement between TCG Detroit and Ameritech Michigan (TCG Interconnection Agreement). Ameritech Application at 10, and Vol. 2.3, Edwards Aff. at 5;
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97368.pdf
                      • federal universal service support payments for previously-received recovery from the interstate access charge system through LTS.163 The rule revisions in the First Report and Order removed LTS amounts from price cap LEC CCL calculations, but postponed making conforming revisions in Section 69.105(b) to the CCL rate calculation for NECA tariff participants.164 Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-368 165 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. 166 Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990); WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969). 167 Universal Service Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 9170; see also id. at 9164, 9165-66, 9169. 168 Prior to January 1, 1998, LTS is a carrier's total common line revenue requirement less revenues received from SLCs and
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97387.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97387.wp
                      • AND DISCUSSION 12. Beehive raises several arguments in support of its position that the decision to modify the ex parte procedures applicable to its complaint violated the Commission's own rules, and thereby tainted that proceeding. We will address these arguments seriatim. Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-387 _____________________________________________________________________________ Application at 5-10. 38 Id. 39 Id. at 8. 40 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. 41 Omnipoint Corp. v. FCC, 78 F.3d 620, 631 (D.C. Cir. 1996) (upholding Commission's authority to 42 waive rules providing parties right to file reply comments in rulemaking proceeding). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200(a). 43 See, e.g., East River Electric Cooperative, DA 97-205 (Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, 44 released Jan. 28, 1997); Application of Comsat Corp., DA 96-1972 (International Bureau, released Nov.
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da982014.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da982014.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da982014.wp
                      • the petitioners that requested the respective extensions or waivers. With the exception of the limited extensions granted herein, all respondents remain bound by the October 6, 1998 deadline. III. ORDERING CLAUSES 11. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. section 154(i), and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 1.46, that GTE's request for extension of time is GRANTED to the extent described herein. 12. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. section 154(i), and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 1.46
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da982050.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da982050.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da982050.wp
                      • extensions or waivers. With the exception of the limited extensions granted herein, all respondents remain bound by the October 6, 1998 deadline. III. ORDERING CLAUSES 6. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. section 154(i), and sections 0.91, Federal Communications Commission DA 98-2050 3 0.291, 1.3, and 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 1.46, that Sprint's request for extension of time is GRANTED to the extent described herein. 7. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. section 154(i), and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 1.46
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da982333.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da982333.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da982333.wp
                      • a population of 6,140 and occupies only 40 square miles. The District contends that other cities within Maine having larger and more dense populations are classified as rural, and argue that the designation of Berwick as urban is derived from its close proximity to Portland.18 Federal Communications Commission DA 98-2333 19 District 267 Petition at 1. 20 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. 21 WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972) (WAIT Radio). 22 Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). 23 WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1157. 24 Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. 25 47 C.F.R. � 54.505(b)(3)(ii). See Universal Service Order, 12 FCC Rcd
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98082.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98082.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98082.wp
                      • lists the commenters and reply commenters in this proceeding. The comment deadline was August 16, 1996. The reply deadline was September 16, 1996. The Illinois Commerce Commission and the Telecommunications Resellers Association filed late comments, and GST Telecom Inc. and WinStar Communications Inc. filed late replies. We grant these commenters' motions to accept their late-filed pleadings. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (stating that "[a]ny provision of the rules may be waived by the Commission on its own motion or on petition if good cause therefor is shown"). 100 Many commenters use the phrase "cost recovery" in some contexts to refer to the distribution among carriers of the costs of providing number portability, and in other contexts to refer to the collection
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98271.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98271.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98271.wp
                      • are more credible. We advise BellSouth to respond, in future applications, with verifiable information refuting competitive LEC allegations. Likewise, we advise competitive LECs to respond with verifiable information refuting BellSouth's assertions and evidence. For example, in response to Sprint's allegation that it has experienced "ongoing" problems with loops, BellSouth asserts that between January 2, 1998 and August 14, 1998, only 1.3 percent of unbundled loops provided to Sprint had problems resulting in missed due dates. BellSouth adds that during this same period it met 91 percent of its due dates. Moreover, BellSouth claims that 97.5 percent of unbundled loop cutovers for Sprint were completed within the expected time interval.646 BellSouth's affiant, however, simply presents these figures without any supporting documentation or
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da991474.doc
                      • cannot afford the expense of an SS7 network by allowing access to foreign databases through the use of transient TCAP messages carried over U S WEST's SS7 network. On July 27, 1999, the Commission released a Public Notice seeking comments on U S WEST's Petition. No comments were filed. II. DISCUSSION A. Restructured SS7 Call Set-Up Rate Elements 6. Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules provides that the Commission may grant waivers of its rules ``if good cause therefor is shown.'' Courts have interpreted this rule to require petitioners to demonstrate that special circumstances justify a departure from the general rule and that such a deviation will serve the public interest. U S WEST has made investments to provide its network
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da991878.doc
                      • assess a forfeiture against any person found to have willfully or repeatedly violated any provision of the Act or any Commission rule, regulation, or order. . Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j) and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.717, and 1.718 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.717, and 1.718 et seq., that the informal request from JMJ Associates, Inc. for reconsideration of the February 6, 1998 letter ruling of the Formal Complaints and Investigations Branch IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Acting Assistant Chief, Enforcement Division Common Carrier Bureau
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992036.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992036.txt
                      • conclude that, on the facts presented, granting SMBSD's petition for waiver would undermine the Commission's method for ensuring that universal service support mechanisms are ``specific, predictable and sufficient'' and, therefore, SMBSD's petition is denied. conclusion It is THEREFORE ORDERED, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i) and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the Santa Maria-Bonita School District's petition for waiver IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Lisa M. Zaina Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from Gail M. Tisser, Ph.D., Santa Maria-Bonita School District (SMBSD), to Magalie R. Salas, FCC, dated March 2, 1999 (SMBSD Petition). See Federal-State Joint Board
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992037.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992037.txt
                      • waiver of the September 30, 1999, deadline for implementation of non-recurring services is, therefore, granted. Furthermore, MVCSD's petition to extend the deadline for MVCSD by 30 days to October 30, 1999, is also granted. conclusion It is THEREFORE ORDERED, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i) and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the Mesa Vista Consolidated School District's petition for waiver IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Lisa M. Zaina Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from Bruce Peterson, Mesa Vista Consolidated Schools District (MVCSD), to Kathy Dole and Irene M. Flannery, FCC, dated September 15, 1999 (MVCSD Petition). See
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992219.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992219.txt
                      • Cirpiano, Jr. to Federal Communications Commission, Office of the Secretary, dated July 16, 1999, at 2. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b) ("[a]n affected party requesting review of a division decision by a Committee of the Board pursuant to � 54.719(a), shall file such request within thirty (30) days of issuance of the decision by the division."). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972) ("An applicant for waiver faces a high hurdle even at the starting gate."). "An applicant for waiver faces a high hurdle even at the starting gate." WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969),). See Changes to the Board of
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992638.doc
                      • On April 29, 1999, the Commission released a Public Notice seeking comment on the Petition. Two parties filed comments, both in support of the Petition. This Order grants Bristol Bay a limited one-year waiver of the corporate operations expense limit requirements of section 36.621(a)(4) of the Commission's rules. II. BACKGROUND A. The Standard for Granting a Waiver . Under section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, a waiver may be granted "if good cause therefor is shown." As interpreted by the courts, this requires that a petitioner demonstrate that "special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule and such a deviation will serve the public interest." . In the Universal Service Order, the Commission adopted a high standard for granting a
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992728.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992728.txt
                      • and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by Horton Free Public Library, Horton, Kansas, on September 7, 1999, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R. Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Universal Service Administrative Co. to Horton Free Public Library, dated July 8, 1999 (Funding Commitment Decision Letter) (emphasis added). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. -2728 -2728 � 9 � � �
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992763.doc
                      • interest. We, therefore, waive the year-end 1999 CAM filing date until March 15, 2000, for mid-sized ILECs planning to file CAMs at the Class B level for the 1999 reporting year. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i) and 155(c) and Sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291 and 1.3, that the filing date for year-end cost allocation manual revisions in Section 64.903(b) is waived until March 15, 2000, for mid-sized ILECs planning to file their cost allocation manuals at the Class B account level effective for the 1999 reporting year. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Kenneth P. Moran Chief, Accounting
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992776.doc
                      • conditioned upon Conversent's provision of customer notification and handling of customer complaints as described above and further detailed in their Waiver Petition and Supplement to Petition. Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1, 4, and 258, of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.111, 0.311, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Conversent Communications, LLC on November 15, 1999, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon its release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Robert C. Atkinson Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Implementation of the Subscriber Carrier Selection Changes Provisions
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992777.doc
                      • of this waiver is conditioned upon ITS' provision of customer notification and handling of customer complaints as described above and further detailed in its Waiver Petition. Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1, 4, and 258, of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.111, 0.311, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Iowa Telecommunications Services on October 8, 1999, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Robert C. Atkinson Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Implementation of the Subscriber Carrier Selection Changes Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and Policies and Rules Concerning Unauthorized
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992796.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992796.txt
                      • � 54.720(b); see also "SLD Procedure for Post-Commitment Appeals" at http://www.sl.universalservice/org/reference/appeals.asp. ("To submit a letter of appeal to the SLD": 1. Write a letter and submit it by mail to the SLD so that is received no later than 30 days after the date your FCD Letter was issued.") (emphasis in original). Appeal Letter at 2. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969) ("An applicant for waiver faces a high hurdle even at the starting gate.") Federal Communications Commission DA 99-2796 Federal Communications Commission DA 99-2796 @& �|� ! 1 A Q a q � ` � � � � � � �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �`� �0�
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992970.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992970.txt
                      • Fort Mojave's request that this waiver, as applied to Fort Mojave, be retroactive to January 1, 1998. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE . Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4, 10, 201-205, 254, 303(r), and 405 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154, 160, 201-205, 254, 303(r), and 405, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 the Petitions for Waiver filed by Gila River Telecommunications, Inc., Tohono O'odham Utility Authority, San Carlos Apache Telecommunications Utility, Inc., and Fort Mojave Telecommunications, Inc. ARE GRANTED temporarily, until the Commission rules on these issues in a further proceeding and any rules adopted in that proceeding go into effect. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992982.doc
                      • Petitioners have shown good cause for granting this Petition, and that grant of this petition will not result in harm to the PSTN. We emphasize the conditions for grant of this waiver. ORDERING CLAUSE 16. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 0.91, 0.291, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �1.3, that Lucent Technologies, Inc.'s Petition for Waiver of Section 68.6 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 68.6 IS GRANTED subject to the conditions stated herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION L. Charles Keller Chief, Network Services Division Common Carrier Bureau Lucent Technologies, Inc., Files Petition for Waiver; Public Comment Invited, File No. NSD-L-99-49, Public Notice,
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da993013.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da993013.txt
                      • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Federal-State Joint Board on ) CC Docket No. 96-45 Universal Service ) order Adopted: December 28, 1999 Released: December 28, 1999 By the Common Carrier Bureau: INTRODUCTION Pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, we find good cause to waive, on our own motion, Commission rules pertaining to the deadline for the implementation of non-recurring services during Year One of the schools and libraries universal service support mechanism. As described in more detail below, we waive the September 30, 1999, deadline for implementation of non-recurring services during Year One for
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99206.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99206.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99206.wp
                      • Rcd at 21487. 32 Id. 33 Id. at 21488. 34 See 47 C.F.R. Part 69; see also MTS and WATS Market Structure, CC Docket No. 78-72, Phase I, Third Report and Order, 93 FCC 2d 241 (1983) (Access Charge Order). The Commission has not prescribed a special access rate structure. Access Charge Order, 93 FCC 2d at 314-15. 35 Section 1.3 permits the Commission to grant waivers of any of its rules if "good cause therefor is shown." 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. 36 See Northeast Cellular Telephone Company v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular); WAIT Radio v. FCC (WAIT Radio), 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969) ("Good cause" is interpreted to require petitioners to show that
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99256.doc
                      • providers, which are likely to be small entities, the services they require for the provision of health care services. VI. ORDERING CLAUSES IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4, 10, 201-202, 214, 220, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154, 160, 201-202, 214, 220 and 254, and sections 1.3 and 1.103 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 1.103, this ORDER is ADOPTED. The requirements adopted in this ORDER shall be effective immediately upon publication in the Federal Register. They shall be applied prospectively to all future commitments of support for the benefit of rural health care providers, including all pending applications. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that,
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99292.doc
                      • Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matters of ) ) Changes to the Board of ) CC Docket No. 97-21 Directors of the National Exchange ) Carrier Association, Inc. ) ) Federal-State Joint Board on ) CC Docket No. 96-45 Universal Service ) ORDER Adopted: October 8, 1999 Released: October 8, 1999 By the Commission: I. INTRODUCTION 1. Pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, we find good cause to grant, on our own motion, a one-time, limited waiver of four Commission rules pertaining to the schools and libraries universal service support mechanism in cases where discount funding commitments were made or disbursed in violation of our rules. We also direct the Administrator of the universal service support mechanisms (the Universal
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99397.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99397.txt
                      • regulatory and financial accounting purposes; (3) foregoes the opportunity to seek recovery of the write-off through a low-end adjustment, an exogenous adjustment, or an above-cap filing; and (4) agrees to submit information concerning its depreciation accounts, including forecast additions and retirements for major network accounts and replacement plans for digital central offices. Finally, the waiver request must comply with section 1.3 of the Commission's rules. We will consider alternative proposals by carriers seeking a waiver of our depreciation requirements. Such alternative proposals, however, must provide the same protections to guard against adverse impacts on consumers and competition as the conditions adopted in this Order provide. The first and second conditions of the waiver process we establish in this Order require that
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.txt
                      • terms of variability of transactions and service hours) and capture response times properly. We further find that, in addition to accommodating current demand, Bell Atlantic demonstrates that its pre-ordering systems and interfaces are scalable to handle reasonably foreseeable demand volumes. We base our conclusion on Bell Atlantic's current performance and KPMG's findings. We find that Bell Atlantic processed more than 1.3 million pre-ordering transactions from January through July 1999, with more than 200,000 processed in July alone. In addition, KPMG found that Bell Atlantic's pre-ordering interfaces and systems are capable of handling projected year-end 1999 volumes. KPMG also evaluated Bell Atlantic's network architecture and found that its systems have sufficient capacity to meet expected future usage volumes. We also reject assertions
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000033.doc
                      • will conform to the conditions specified in that order, we conclude that the devices should be submitted for Part 68 conformance testing to prove that they will pose no harm to the PSTN. ORDERING CLAUSES 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that the requests for waiver of Section 68.312(i) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. � 68.312(i), by Nor Pac Group, Inc., RadioShack, CIDCO Incorporated, and UNICO Pacific Group ARE GRANTED to the extent stated herein. 8. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitions for waiver ARE GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: that
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000106.doc
                      • policy goals. Accordingly, we grant its waiver request at this time. This waiver applies only to those services specified in BellSouth's waiver petition and supplement. . Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 201-205, and 218-220 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 154(j), 201-205, and 218-220, and Sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.106, and 32.27 of the Commissions rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.106, and 32.27, that the Petition for Waiver filed by BellSouth IS HEREBY GRANTED. Kenneth P. Moran Chief, Accounting Safeguards Division See 47 CFR � 32.27. On August 9, 1995, BellSouth filed a supplement to its petition in which it identified additional affiliate transactions to be included
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000264.doc
                      • D.C. In the Matter of ) ) Puerto Rico Telephone Company ) ) CCB/CPD No. 99-36 Petition for Waiver of ) Section 61.41 or Section 54.303(a) ) of the Commission's Rules ) ORDER Adopted: February 10, 2000 Released: February 11, 2000 By the Chief, Competitive Pricing Division: On December 10, 1999, Puerto Rico Telephone Company, Inc. (PRTC), pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, filed a petition for waiver of section 61.41 of the Commission's rules, as well as any other provisions that would otherwise prevent PRTC from remaining subject to rate-of-return regulation and in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) Common Line Pool (PRTC Petition). PRTC alternatively requests a limited waiver of section 54.303(a) of the Commission's rules in
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000305.doc
                      • Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, (rel. Aug. 27, 1999). Because the instant petition was filed before our new rules took effect, U S West's request is subject to the previous standard. Policy and Rules Concerning Rates for Dominant Carriers, Order, CC Docket No. 87-313, 5 FCC Rcd 6786, 6824 (1990) (LEC Price Cap Order). Id. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See, e.g., Petitions for Waiver of Part 69 of the Commission's rules to Establish Switched Access Rate Elements for SONET-Based Service, 11 FCC Rcd 21010 (1996) (SONET Waiver Order), and U S West Communications, Inc. Petition for Waiver Part 69 of the Commission's Rules to Provide Additional SONET-Based Switched Access Services, 13 FCC Rcd 3129 (1998) (U S West SONET
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000388.doc
                      • to monitor the performance of these ADSL modems and the networks that serve them, and to gather and share with us information that might be relevant to general harm to the PSTN or cross-talk problems. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE 28. Accordingly, pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. sections 0.91, 0.291, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. section 1.3, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the request for waiver of section 68.308(e)(1) of the Commission's rules 47 C.F.R. � 68.308(e)(1), by Alcatel USA, Inc., IS GRANTED to the extent discussed herein. 29. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the petition for waiver is granted SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: that the equipment (1)
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000389.doc
                      • contract by US West and Advanced Technologies to MediaOne and covers the period from June 12, 1998, to April 1, 1999. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 201-205, 218-220, and 254(k) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 154(j), 201-205, 218-220, and 254(k), and Sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.106, 32.18, and 32.27 of the Commissions rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.106, 32.18, and 32.27, that the Petition for Waiver filed by US West, Inc. IS GRANTED to the extent described above in paragraph 7. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Kenneth P. Moran Chief, Accounting Safeguards Division Common Carrier Bureau US West, Inc. is the holding company for several
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000477.doc
                      • Winstar. Ameritech; the City of Chicago, Citizens Utility Board, and Public Utilities Bureau (Illinois Intervenors); SBC; and the United States Telephone Association (USTA) support the Waiver Petition. We believe that Illinois' need to engage in a customer education program within a geographically contiguous area with minimal dialing ``islands'' justifies a temporary delay of ten-digit dialing. III. DISCUSSION Pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, the Commission may grant a waiver of a provision of its rules upon a showing of "good cause." As construed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, section 1.3 allows the Commission to grant a waiver if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule and such a deviation will
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000620.doc
                      • Recon. Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 3218). Pursuant to these new procedures, a carrier must: (1) obtain the subscriber's written authorization; (2) obtain confirmation from the subscriber via a toll-free number provided exclusively for the purpose of confirming orders electronically; or (3) utilize an independent third party to verify the subscriber's order. See 47 C.F.R. � 64.1150. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972) (Wait Radio). Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1157. Id. at 1159. Sprint included with its February 16, 2000 waiver petition a draft of the notification letter that GTE-LD
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000742.doc
                      • Recon. Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 3218). Pursuant to these new procedures, a carrier must: (1) obtain the subscriber's written authorization; (2) obtain confirmation from the subscriber via a toll-free number provided exclusively for the purpose of confirming orders electronically; or (3) utilize an independent third party to verify the subscriber's order. See 47 C.F.R. � 64.1150. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972) (Wait Radio). Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1157. Id. at 1159. Waiver Petition at 2. Amended Waiver Petition at 2. IECOM included a draft notification letter in its
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000746.doc
                      • provisions of 47 C.F.R. � 64.2401 by April 1, 2000. The resulting short-term delay in the effective date of these rule provisions also has the potential to provide partial relief to many petitioners. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(j), section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91 and 0.291, that the petitions, specified in the Order, that seek limited or temporary waiver from compliance with any of the requirements of 47 C.F.R. � 64.2401 by April 1, 2000, are hereby DENIED. IT
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000748.doc
                      • provision of customer notification and handling of customer complaints as described above and further detailed in its Waiver Petition. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1, 4, and 258, of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.111, 0.311, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Broadwing Telecommunications, Inc. on February 2, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon its release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Implementation of the Subscriber Carrier Selection Changes Provisions
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000761.doc
                      • Public Schools, issued November 8, 1999. 47 C.F.R. � 54.720. 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. Letter from Universal Service Administrative Company to Lola S. Tornabene, Amelia County Public School District, issued August 24, 1999. Letter from Janet H. Ashman, Amelia County Public Schools, to Schools and Libraries Division, filed October 29, 1999. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990); WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969). Federal Communications Commission DA 00-761 Federal Communications Commission DA 00-761 � � �
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000893.doc
                      • section 64.2401 of the Commission's rules by April 1, 2000. The resulting short-term delay in the effective date of these rule provisions also has the potential to provide partial relief to many petitioners. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(j), section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91 and 0.291, that the petitions, specified in this Order, that seek limited or temporary waiver from compliance with any of the requirements of 47 C.F.R. � 64.2401 by April 1, 2000, are hereby DENIED. IT
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000956.doc
                      • DA 00-843 (rel. April 12, 2000). Because of the May 1, 2000, deadline, there was insufficient time for pleading cycles on the other petitions. There was also insufficient time to consider the reply pleadings in the Ohio proceeding. It is unlikely, in any event, that additional pleadings would have raised issues not presented by the other filings. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Northeast Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972). Id., 418 F.2d at 1159; Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. Oregon Petition at 1. Id. at 2. Id. at 2, 4 n.3. Id. at 3, 4. Id.
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000975.doc
                      • conditioned upon One Call's provision of customer notification and handling of customer complaints as described above and further detailed in its Waiver Petition and Supplement thereto. Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.111, 0.311, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, 1.3, the waiver request filed by One Call Communications, Inc. d/b/a Opticom on February 28, 2000, and supplemented on March 10, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon its release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000981.doc
                      • in the Alcatel Waiver Order, that Petitioners have shown good cause for granting the requested waivers. Applications to register these devices under Part 68 of our rules may be submitted with this waiver. ORDERING CLAUSES 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that the requests for waiver of Section 68.308(e)(1) ) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. � 68.308(e)(1) by Lucent Technologies, Ramp Networks, Telocity, Diamond Multimedia, CIS Technology, Analog & Digital Devices, Arescom, Digicom Systems, Sumitomo Electric Industries, and Askey Computer Corp. ARE GRANTED to the extent stated herein. 8. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000985.doc
                      • Recon. Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 3218). Pursuant to these new procedures, a carrier must: (1) obtain the subscriber's written authorization; (2) obtain confirmation from the subscriber via a toll-free number provided exclusively for the purpose of confirming orders electronically; or (3) utilize an independent third party to verify the subscriber's order. See 47 C.F.R. � 64.1150. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972) (WAIT Radio). Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1157. WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1159; Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. Waiver Petition at 2. IECOM included a notification
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000986.doc
                      • Recon. Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 3218). Pursuant to these new procedures, a carrier must: (1) obtain the subscriber's written authorization; (2) obtain confirmation from the subscriber via a toll-free number provided exclusively for the purpose of confirming orders electronically; or (3) utilize an independent third party to verify the subscriber's order. See 47 C.F.R. � 64.1150. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972) (WAIT Radio). Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1157. WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1159; Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. Waiver Petition at 2. Access Point included a
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001003.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001003.txt
                      • May 4, 2000 Released: May 5, 2000 Before the Common Carrier Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. The Bureau has under review a request by the Illinois State Department of Education (ISDE) to waive the June 30, 2000 deadline for the use of nonrecurring services by Illinois schools receiving services under the schools and libraries universal service support mechanism. Pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, and for the reasons outlined below, we find good cause to waive Commission rules pertaining to the deadline for the implementation of nonrecurring services in Year Two of the schools and libraries universal service support mechanism for the Illinois petitioners as well as for all schools and libraries receiving support in Year Two of this program.
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001097.doc
                      • Tech Valley's provision of customer notification and handling of customer complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and supplements. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Tech Valley Communications, Inc. and GFC Communications, Inc. on April 5, 2000, and supplemented on April 18, 2000, and April 26, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon its release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001113.doc
                      • notice of the account changes to the affected customers, following completion of the transfer, through a billing message in the next billing cycle. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by GTE Service Corporation, GTE North Incorporated, and GTE Communications Corporation on April 10, 2000, and supplemented on April 18, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon its release. Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001114.doc
                      • and handling of customer complaints, as described above and further detailed in their Supplemental Waiver Petition and Second Supplement. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Touch America, Inc. and Qwest Communications International, Inc. on March 17, 2000, and supplemented on April 12, 2000 and May 3, 2000, IS GRANTED subject to the conditions, and to the extent, indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release.
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001133.doc
                      • reasons as in that order, that Petitioners have shown good cause for granting the requested waivers. Applications to register these devices under Part 68 of our rules may be submitted with this waiver. ORDERING CLAUSES 9. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that the requests for waiver of Section 68.312(i) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. � 68.312(i), by Telephone Equipment Supply, Inc., Casio Communications Inc., Tandy Corporation, Atlinks USA, Inc., Matsushita Electric Corporation of America, Vtech Communications Limited, and Cidco Incorporated ARE GRANTED to the extent stated herein. 10. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001160.doc
                      • customer notification and handling of customer complaints, as described above and further detailed in their Waiver Petition and Supplement. ORDERING CLAUSES 11. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 091, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by PowerNet Global, Inc. and America One Communications, Inc. on March 17, 2000, and supplemented on May 3, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001183.doc
                      • in the Alcatel Waiver Order, that Petitioners have shown good cause for granting the requested waivers. Applications to register these devices under Part 68 of our rules may be submitted with this waiver. ORDERING CLAUSES 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that the requests for waiver of Section 68.308(e)(1) ) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. � 68.308(e)(1) by 3Com Corporation, Intel Corporation, Multi-Tech Systems, Inc., Xircom, Inc., GlobeSpan, Inc., Telocity, Inc., Askey Computer Corporation, and Aztech Systems, Ltd. ARE GRANTED to the extent stated herein. 8. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitions
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001278.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001278.txt
                      • School Board of Brevard County, to Federal Communications Commission, filed February 8, 2000 (Letter of Appeal). Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Joe Boyle and Lori Fadok, Brevard County School District, dated November 2, 1999 (Funding Commitment Decision Letter). 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). 47 C.F.R.� 1.7. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. -1278 -1278 � � � �
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001402.doc
                      • of this waiver is conditioned upon CenturyTel's provision of customer notification, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplement. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by CenturyTel Communications, Inc. on April 19, 2000, and supplemented on June 5, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Irene M. Flannery Chief, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau Implementation
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001426.doc
                      • TTI National and MRP's provision of customer notification and handling of customer complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by grant MCI WorldCom, Inc. and its subsidiary, TTI National, Inc., on April 11, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Irene M. Flannery Chief, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001427.doc
                      • upon Talk.com's provision of customer notification and handling of customer complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplement. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Talk.com, Inc. and Talk.com Holding Corp. on April 19, 2000, and supplemented on May 15, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Irene M. Flannery Chief, Accounting Policy Division, Common
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001430.doc
                      • in the Alcatel Waiver Order, that Petitioners have shown good cause for granting the requested waivers. Applications to register these devices under Part 68 of our rules may be submitted with this waiver. ORDERING CLAUSES 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that the requests for waiver of Section 68.308(e)(1) ) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. � 68.308(e)(1) by Westell Technologies Inc., GVC Corporation, Ambit Microsystems Corporation, Xpeed Inc., Askey Computer Corporation, Arescom Inc., Motorola Inc., and Cayman Systems, Inc. ARE GRANTED to the extent stated herein. 8. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001434.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001434.txt
                      • that CenturyTel is not a small company and, therefore, would operate more efficiently under price cap regulation. Discussion For the reasons discussed below, we find that good cause exists for us to waive section 61.41(c)(2) of our rules, and that it would be in the public interest to grant CenturyTel's waiver request. As discussed previously, the courts have interpreted section 1.3 of the Commission's rules to require a petitioner seeking a waiver of a Commission rules to demonstrate that special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, and such a deviation will serve the public interest. We conclude that, in this case, waiver of section 61.41(c)(2) of the Commission's rules will serve the public interest. We agree with CenturyTel that
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001509.doc
                      • provision of customer notification and handling of customer complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition, Supplement, and Further Supplement. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by TXU Communications Telecom Services Company dba TXU Communications on April 14, 2000, and supplemented on June 6, 2000, and June 8, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001548.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001548.txt
                      • the sale of exchanges operated by carriers subject to price cap regulation. We, therefore, require U S WEST to make such an adjustment. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Citizens Telecommunications Company of North Dakota and U S WEST Communications, Inc. on February 16, 2000, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001566.doc
                      • Id. at �� 1, 19. Id. at � 7. Id. at �� 7, 17-18. Id. at � 18. Id. In re Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, CC Docket No. 96-98, Petition by the Iowa Utilities Board for Temporary Waiver, CCB/CPD No. 00-15, at 1-2 (filed April 26, 2000) (Iowa Pet.). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Northeast Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972). Id., 418 F.2d at 1159; Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. Iowa Pet. at 3. Iowa Pet. at 3 & attach. A at 1-2. Iowa Pet. at 3.
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001583.doc
                      • of this waiver is conditioned upon Citizen's provision of customer notification, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplements. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Citizens Utilities Company on April 14, 2000, and supplemented on May 26, 2000 and June 12, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters Associate Division Chief, Accounting
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001584.doc
                      • this waiver is conditioned upon the petitioners' provision of customer notification, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplement. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request jointly filed by Citizens Utilities Company and U S WEST Communications, Inc. on April 7, 2000, and supplemented on July 6, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters Associate
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001585.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001585.txt
                      • regulation no later than one year after acquiring the price cap access lines from U S WEST. Discussion For the reasons discussed below, we find that good cause exists for us to waive section 61.41(c)(2) of our rules, and that it would be in the public interest to grant Rye's waiver request. As discussed previously, the courts have interpreted section 1.3 of the Commission's rules to require a petitioner seeking a waiver of a Commission rules to demonstrate that special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, and such a deviation will serve the public interest. Because Rye is significantly smaller than any of the carriers subject to mandatory price caps, we conclude that special circumstances support a waiver of
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001613.doc
                      • in the Alcatel Waiver Order, that Petitioners have shown good cause for granting the requested waivers. Applications to register these devices under Part 68 of our rules may be submitted with this waiver. ORDERING CLAUSES 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that the requests for waiver of Section 68.308(e)(1) ) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. � 68.308(e)(1) by Lucent Technologies, ECI Telecom, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Multi-Tech Systems, Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., TelGen, Inc., Integrated Telecom Express, Inc., Shark Multimedia, Inc., Intel Corporation, and Asustek Computer Inc. ARE GRANTED to the extent stated
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001625.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001625.txt
                      • price cap regulation no later than one year after acquiring the price cap exchanges from GTE. Discussion For the reasons discussed below, we find that good cause exists for us to waive section 61.41(c)(2) of the Commission's rules, and that it would be in the public interest to grant Spectra's waiver request. As discussed previously, the courts have interpreted section 1.3 of the Commission's rules to require a petitioner seeking a waiver of a Commission rule to demonstrate that special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, and such a deviation will serve the public interest. Because Spectra is significantly smaller than any of the carriers subject to mandatory price caps, we find that special circumstances support a waiver of
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001653.doc
                      • monitor the performance of these ADSL, RADSL, and G.LITE modems and the networks that serve them, and to gather and share with us information that might be relevant to general harm to the PSTN or cross-talk problems. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. sections 0.91, 0.291, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. section 1.3, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the request for waiver of section 68.308(e)(1) of the Commission's rules 47 C.F.R. � 68.308(e)(1), by Paradyne Corporation, IS GRANTED to the extent discussed herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Certification and Request is granted SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: that the equipment: (1) meets the
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001677.doc
                      • of this waiver is conditioned upon CenturyTel's provision of customer notification, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplement. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by CenturyTel of Central Wisconsin, LLC on May 11, 2000, and supplemented on June 14, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Irene M. Flannery Chief, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001678.doc
                      • of this waiver is conditioned upon Spectra's provision of customer notification, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplement. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Spectra Communications Group, LLC on May 11, 2000, and supplemented on June 14, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Irene M. Flannery Chief, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001679.doc
                      • this waiver is conditioned upon Telephone USA's provision of customer notification, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplement. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Telephone USA of Wisconsin, LLC on May 11, 2000, and supplemented on June 14, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Irene M. Flannery Chief, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001690.doc
                      • conditioned upon U S WEST's and Rye's provision of customer notification, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplements. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the joint waiver request filed by U S WEST Communications, Inc. and The Rye Telephone Company on March 24, 2000, and supplemented on May 17, 2000 and June 2, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001696.doc
                      • not required for addition of models, addition of manufacturers, or modification of equipment. Of course, an application to register these devices is required which should reference the waiver grant to facilitate staff review. ORDERING CLAUSES 8. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that the requests for waiver of Section 68.308(e)(1) ) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. � 68.308(e)(1) by Arescom Inc., Askey Computer Corp., CIS Technology Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., 2WIRE, INC., Efficient Networks, Inc., and Turbocomm Tech. Inc. ARE GRANTED to the extent stated herein. 9. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitions
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001761.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001761.txt
                      • that we remove all remaining individual caps on high-cost loop support. We deny the additional relief requested by Interstate and its co-petitioners, Western, and Vtel. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4, 5, 201, 202, 219-220, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154, 155, 201, 202, 219-220, 254, and sections 1.3, 0.91, and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 0.91, and 0.291, that the petitioners' requests for removal of individual caps on high-cost loop support imposed as part of the grant of study area waivers ARE GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4, 5, 201, 202, 219-220, and 254 of the Communications Act
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001772.doc
                      • is conditioned upon Stratos' provision of customer notification and handling of customer complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Stratos Telecom, Inc. and Stratos Offshore Services Company on May 10, 2000 IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Irene M. Flannery Chief, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau Implementation of
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001801.doc
                      • reasons as in that order, that Petitioners have shown good cause for granting the requested waivers. Applications to register these devices under Part 68 of our rules may be submitted with this waiver. ORDERING CLAUSES 9. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that the requests for waiver of Section 68.312(i) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. � 68.312(i), by ATLINKS USA, Inc., VTECH Communications Ltd., Matsushita Electric Corporation of America, and CIDCO Incorporated ARE GRANTED to the extent stated herein. 10. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitions for waiver ARE GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001819.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001819.txt
                      • the Commission's competitive bidding requirements for certain existing, binding contracts). See, e.g., Mastermind Internet Service, Inc., Order, DA 00-167, para. 15 (rel. May 23, 2000) (``Waiver is . . . appropriate if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, and such deviation would better serve the public interest than strict adherence to the general rule.''); 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See, e.g., Scranton School District, CC Docket Nos. 96-45 and 97-21, Order, DA 00-20, para. 8 (rel. January 7, 2000). -1819 -1819 L M � � �
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001820.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001820.txt
                      • the Commission's competitive bidding requirements for certain existing, binding contracts). See, e.g., Mastermind Internet Service, Inc., Order, DA 00-167, para. 15 (rel. May 23, 2000) (``Waiver is . . . appropriate if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, and such deviation would better serve the public interest than strict adherence to the general rule.''); 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See, e.g., Scranton School District, CC Docket Nos. 96-45 and 97-21, Order, DA 00-20, para. 8 (rel. January 7, 2000). -1820 -1820 F G � � �
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001821.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001821.txt
                      • the Commission's competitive bidding requirements for certain existing, binding contracts). See, e.g., Mastermind Internet Service, Inc., Order, DA 00-167, para. 15 (rel. May 23, 2000) (``Waiver is . . . appropriate if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, and such deviation would better serve the public interest than strict adherence to the general rule.''); 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See, e.g., Scranton School District, CC Docket Nos. 96-45 and 97-21, Order, DA 00-20, para. 8 (rel. January 7, 2000). -1821 -1821 V W (R) � �
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001862.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001862.txt
                      • cap regulation no later than one year after acquiring the price cap exchanges from GTE. Discussion For the reasons discussed below, we find that good cause exists for us to waive section 61.41(c)(2) of the Commission's rules, and that it would be in the public interest to grant Telephone USA's waiver request. As discussed previously, the courts have interpreted section 1.3 of the Commission's rules to require a petitioner seeking a waiver of a Commission rule to demonstrate that special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, and such a deviation will serve the public interest. Because Telephone USA is significantly smaller than any of the carriers subject to mandatory price caps, we also find that special circumstances support a
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001863.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001863.txt
                      • price cap regulation no later than one year after acquiring the price cap exchanges from GTE. Discussion For the reasons discussed below, we find that good cause exists for us to waive section 61.41(c)(2) of the Commission's rules, and that it would be in the public interest to grant CenturyTel's waiver request. As discussed previously, the courts have interpreted section 1.3 of the Commission's rules to require a petitioner seeking a waiver of a Commission rule to demonstrate that special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, and such a deviation will serve the public interest. Because CenturyTel is significantly smaller than any of the carriers subject to mandatory price caps, we also find that special circumstances support a waiver
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001883.doc
                      • waiver would further the Commission's interest in relieving some of the administrative burdens faced by small telephone companies. III. DISCUSSION 10. For the reasons discussed below, we find that the Petitioners demonstrate good cause for waiver of sections 61.41(c) and (d) of our rules, and that it is in the public interest to grant the Petitioners' waiver request. Under section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, "[a]ny provision of the rules may be waived by the Commission on its own motion or on petition if good cause therefor is shown." As interpreted by the courts, this requires that a petitioner demonstrate that "special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule and such deviation will serve the public interest." In this case,
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001894.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001894.txt
                      • cap regulation no later than one year after acquiring the price cap exchange from Qwest. Discussion For the reasons discussed below, we find that good cause exists for us to waive section 61.41(c) of the Commission's rules, and that it would be in the public interest to grant Sully Buttes' waiver request. As discussed previously, the courts have interpreted section 1.3 of the Commission's rules to require a petitioner seeking a waiver of a Commission rule to demonstrate that special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, and such a deviation will serve the public interest. Because Sully Buttes is significantly smaller than any of the carriers subject to mandatory price caps, we also find that special circumstances support a
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001903.doc
                      • is conditioned upon PNG's provision of customer notification and handling of customer complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by PNG Telecommunications, Inc. d/b/a PowerNet Global Communications on June 15, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters Associate Division Chief, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau Implementation
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001908.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001908.txt
                      • make adjustments to their price cap indices to reflect cost changes resulting from rule waivers. We require GTE to make such an adjustment. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Valor Telecommunications of Texas, LP and GTE Southwest Incorporated on April 20, 2000, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001911.doc
                      • near future. During the suspension of the enforcement of the coin sent-paid requirement, we direct carriers and TRS providers to continue to make payphones accessible to TRS users under the terms of the Alternative Plan, as modified and set forth in the 1997 Suspension Order. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 0.91, 0.204, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91(a), 0.204, 0.291, 1.3, that enforcement of the requirement that telecommunications relay services be capable of handling coin sent-paid calls, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 64.604(a)(3), IS SUSPENDED until May 26, 2001, or until such time as the Commission adopts final rules governing TRS users' access to payphones, whichever is earlier. This
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001925.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001925.txt
                      • Service Administrative Co., filed February 2, 1999. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Ken Kern, Catoosa Public Schools, dated January 19, 2000; Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Ken Kern, Catoosa Public Schools, dated March 24, 2000 (Administrator's Decisions on Appeal). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. -1925 -1925 � 7 7 a �f� a [Uk� [Uk� [Uk�
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001934.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001934.txt
                      • October 4, 1999. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Kirstina Popey, Our Lady of Grace School, dated September 27, 1999; Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Kirstina Popey, Our Lady of Grace School, dated March 24, 2000. (Administrator's Decisions on Appeal). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. -1934 -1934 � (c) (c) � �� � ) �� ) �� ) ��
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001965.doc
                      • in the Alcatel Waiver Order, that Petitioners have shown good cause for granting the requested waivers. Applications to register these devices under Part 68 of our rules may be submitted with this waiver. ORDERING CLAUSES 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that the requests for waiver of Section 68.308(e)(1) ) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. � 68.308(e)(1) by Cisco Systems, Integrated Telecom Express Inc., Nokia Networks, Lucent Technologies Inc., Taicom Data Systems Co., Ltd., E-Tech, Inc., GVC Corporation, Efficient Networks, Inc., and Thomson Consumer Electronics ARE GRANTED to the extent stated herein. 8.
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001966.doc
                      • reasons as in that order, that Petitioners have shown good cause for granting the requested waivers. Applications to register these devices under Part 68 of our rules may be submitted with this waiver. ORDERING CLAUSES 9. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that the requests for waiver of Section 68.312(i) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. � 68.312(i), by Lionda Technology Company Limited, North American Foreign Trading Corporation, and ATLINKS USA, Inc. ARE GRANTED to the extent stated herein. 10. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitions for waiver ARE GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001986.doc
                      • upon ACS and LDX's provision of customer notification and handling of customer complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the joint waiver request filed by ACS Systems, Inc. and LD Exchange.com on July 3, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters Associate Division Chief, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau Implementation
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002000.doc
                      • of this waiver is conditioned upon Jordan's provision of customer notification, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplements. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Jordan-Soldier Valley Telephone Company on June 12, 2000, and supplemented on July 17, 2000 and August 15, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters Associate Division Chief
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002001.doc
                      • FCA and GCTI of customer notification and handling of customer complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplement. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Frontier Communications of America, Inc. on June 19, 2000, and supplemented by Frontier Communications of America, Inc. and Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc. on August 18, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002012.doc
                      • upon Zone's provision of customer notification and handling of customer complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplement. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the emergency waiver request filed by Zone Telecom, Inc. on August 7, 2000, and supplemented on August 9, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters Associate Division Chief, Accounting Policy Division, Common
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002043.doc
                      • March 21, 2000. (Administrator's Decisions on Appeal). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See e.g. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (``Waiver is [] appropriate if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, and such deviation would better serve the public interest than strict adherence to the general rule.''); 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. -2043 -2043 � � � � � 3If
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002063.doc
                      • upon IEComm's provision of customer notification and handling of customer complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplement. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by International Exchange Communications, Inc. on May 4, 2000, and supplemented on August 31, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters Associate Chief, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002074.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002074.txt
                      • March 23, 2000 (Administrator's Decisions on Appeal). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See e.g. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (``Waiver is [] appropriate if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, and such deviation would better serve the public interest than strict adherence to the general rule.''); 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. -2074 -2074 � z z z z
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002081.doc
                      • grant of this waiver is conditioned upon Broadwing Local's provision of customer notification, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Broadwing Local Services Inc. on August 17, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters Associate Chief, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau Implementation of the Subscriber Carrier
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002082.doc
                      • is conditioned upon Qwest's and Sully Buttes' provision of customer notification, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplement. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91,0.291, 1.3, the joint waiver request filed by Qwest Corporation and Sully Buttes Telephone Cooperative, Inc. on July 25, 2000, and supplemented on September 6, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters Associate Chief, Accounting
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002093.doc
                      • upon INET's provision of customer notification and handling of customer complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplement. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by INET Interactive Network System, Inc. on July 27, 2000, and supplemented on September 7, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters Associate Chief, Accounting Policy Division, Common
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002151.doc
                      • upon McLeodUSA's provision of customer notification and handling of customer complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplement. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by McLeodUSA Telecommunications Services, Inc. on July 21, 2000, and supplemented on September 15, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters Associate Chief Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002173.doc
                      • in the Alcatel Waiver Order, that Petitioners have shown good cause for granting the requested waivers. Applications to register these devices under Part 68 of our rules may be submitted with this waiver. ORDERING CLAUSES 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that the requests for waiver of Section 68.308(e)(1) ) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. � 68.308(e)(1) by ASUSTeK COMPUTER, INC., Turbocomm Tech. Inc., MAC System Co., Ltd., Dataquest Technology, Inc., Lucent Technologies Inc., 3Com Corporation, and Eicon Technology ARE GRANTED to the extent stated herein. 8. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002174.doc
                      • reasons as in that order, that Petitioners have shown good cause for granting the requested waivers. Applications to register these devices under Part 68 of our rules may be submitted with this waiver. ORDERING CLAUSES 9. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that the requests for waiver of Section 68.312(i) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. � 68.312(i), by Vtech Communications Limited, Kyushu Matsushita Electric Co., Ltd., and ATLINKS USA, Inc. ARE GRANTED to the extent stated herein. 10. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitions for waiver ARE GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002221.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002221.txt
                      • make adjustments to their price cap indices to reflect cost changes resulting from rule waivers. We require Qwest to make such an adjustment. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Citizens Telecommunications Company of Iowa and Qwest Corporation on June 20, 2000, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002222.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002222.txt
                      • make adjustments to their price cap indices to reflect cost changes resulting from rule waivers. We require Qwest to make such an adjustment. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Citizens Telecommunications Company of Nebraska and Qwest Corporation on June 16, 2000, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002407.doc
                      • in the Alcatel Waiver Order, that Petitioners have shown good cause for granting the requested waivers. Applications to register these devices under Part 68 of our rules may be submitted with this waiver. ORDERING CLAUSES 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that the requests for waiver of Section 68.308(e)(1) ) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. � 68.308(e)(1) by Actiontec Electronics, Inc., Broadxent, Inc., Askey Computer Corp., Netopia, Inc., ORCKIT communications Ltd., Telocity, Inc., Coppercom, Inc., CIS Technology Inc., Lectron Co., LTD., ERICSSON RADIO SYSTEMS AB, and Conexant Systems, Inc. ARE GRANTED to the
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002445.doc
                      • upon the Petitioners' provision of customer notification and handling of complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplements. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by OnePoint Communications Corp., Talk.Com, Inc., and Talk.Com Holding Corp., d/b/a The Phone Company, on September 8, 2000, and supplemented on October 25, 2000 and October 30, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release.
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002473.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002473.txt
                      • of section 69.605(c) to similarly-sized carriers. We, therefore, find that Jordan-Soldier's request waiver of section 69.605(c) of the Commission rules should be granted. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Jordan-Soldier Valley Telephone Company and Alpine Communications, L.C. on June 15, 2000, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002522.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002522.txt
                      • that Bell Atlantic-NJ filed its designation application on December 18, 1997). United-NJ Petition at 4; Bell Atlantic-NJ Petition at 4. United-NJ Petition at 2 (designation effective Feb. 1, 1998). Bell Atlantic-NJ Petition at 1-2. United-NJ Petition at 4-5; Bell Atlantic-NJ Petition at 4. United-NJ Petition at 5; Bell Atlantic-NJ Petition at 4. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.201(a)(2). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. Denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972). Northeast Cellular Telephone Co., v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1159; Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. 47 C.F.R. � 54.201(a)(2). D.C. Petition at 1-2, 5; United-NJ Petition at 2, 4; Bell Atlantic-NJ Petition at
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002640.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002640.txt
                      • make adjustments to their price cap indices to reflect cost changes resulting from rule waivers. We require USQwest to make such an adjustment. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Citizens Telecommunications Company of Idaho, Inc. and Qwest Corporation on July 11, 2000, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002662.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002662.txt
                      • to their price cap indices to reflect cost changes resulting from rule waivers. We require USthe Verizon companies to make such an adjustment. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Citizens Telecommunications Company of Illinois, GTE North Incorporated and GTE South Incorporated on September 8, 2000, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002699.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002699.txt
                      • � 54.720(b). 47 C.F.R.� 1.7. Letter from Diana Larson, Northwestern School District 56-3, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., filed September 5, 2000. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Diana Larson, Northwestern School District 56-3, dated September 5, 2000. (Administrator's Decision on Appeal). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. -2699 -2699 � V W V W � �
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002899.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002899.txt
                      • verification process, but it will also diminish the burden on Bell Atlantic and Lifeline customers without imposing any significant costs. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1, 4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 254, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Bell Atlantic-Pennsylvania on December 22, 1999 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order SHALL BE transmitted to the Universal Service Administrative Company. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Katherine L. Schroder Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Subsequent to
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002900.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002900.txt
                      • deadline to September 30, 2001. Applicants eligible for the extension, therefore, may extend their existing contracts for non-recurring services voluntarily until September 30, 2001, without having to comply with the Commission's competitive bidding process. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i) and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, this Order is ADOPTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Order, CC Docket No. 96-45, DA 00-2444 (Common Carrier Bur., rel. November 1, 2000) (November 2000 Extension Order). The Commission's rules require schools and libraries to implement
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00026.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00026.txt
                      • shall be effective 30 days after publication of a summary thereof in the Federal Register. The collection of information contained within is contingent upon approval by the OMB. 49. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 3(25) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended by the Telecommunications Act of 1996, 47 U.S.C. � 153(25), and pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that the Petition of Bell Atlantic-West Virginia for Interim Relief Under Section 706, or, in the Alternative, a LATA Boundary Modification, IS DENIED. 50. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Commission's Consumer Information Bureau, Consumer Information Center, SHALL SEND a copy of this FOURTH REPORT AND ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER,
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00079.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00079.txt
                      • lagged behind commitments for Year 2, we waive section 54.507(a) of the Commission's rules to enable USAC to make disbursements in excess of $562.5 million for the schools and libraries support mechanism in the second quarter of 2000. It is therefore ORDERED, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that the Universal Service Administrative Company's request for waiver is GRANTED, and that sections 54.623(a) and 54.507(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 54.623(a) and 54.507(a), are WAIVED to the extent indicated herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Magalie Roman Salas Secretary See Federal Universal Service Programs Fund Size Projections & Contribution Base
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc000j2.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc000j2.txt
                      • process. In effect, a mandatory categories freeze for all rate-of-return carriers may provide disincentives for these carriers to deploy new technologies due to insufficient cost recovery. Furthermore, certain parties have reported that a categories freeze may have a negative impact on some rate-of-return carriers current universal service high cost support levels. We note that COE Category 4.13 and CW&F Category 1.3 are included in the current Universal Service High Cost Loop formula that is used for the rate-of-return carriers under Part 36. The investment levels in these two categories may increase for rate-of-return carriers as new technologies are deployed, such as facilities to provide DSL services. If the category relationships are frozen at the current year level, rate-of-return carriers will not
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00113.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00113.txt
                      • evidenced by our rules. Accordingly, we conclude that based on the record before us, a modification of our rules is not warranted here and we deny Washington DIS's petition for reconsideration. V. ORDERING CLAUSES 13. It is THEREFORE ORDERED, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i) and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the State of Washington Department of Information Services request for waiver IS GRANTED and the petition for reconsideration IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Magalie Roman Salas Secretary See Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 8776, 9029-9031, paras. 475-483
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00167.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00167.txt
                      • Company, to Chris Webber, Velma Alma Independent School District No. 15 (SLD-148035), issued November 16, 1999; Funding Commitment Letter from Universal Service Administrative Company, to Chris Webber, Life Christian School (SLD-148154), issued November 16, 1999; Funding Commitment Letter from Universal Service Administrative Company, to Chris Webber, Lowrey School District (SLD-152314), issued October 26, 1999). MasterMind Letter at 5. 47 C.F.R. �1.3. WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1158 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972) (WAIT Radio). Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular) WAIT Radio, 897 F.2d at 1157. Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. MasterMind letter at 5. (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-167 Federal Communications Commission FCC
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00183.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00183.txt
                      • the DS3 level passes through electronic equipment that allows the signals carried on the DS1 to be consolidated on to the DS3. Letter from Susanne A. Guyer, Assistant Vice President, Federal Regulatory, Bell Atlantic, to Magalie Roman Salas, Secretary, FCC, CC Docket No. 96-98, Attachment at 2 (filed Apr. 11, 2000) (Bell Atlantic Apr. 11, 2000 Letter). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Third Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3912, para. 486 Supplemental Order at n.9. See Third Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3831, para. 298. See February 28, 2000 Joint Letter at 2 (stating in options 1 and 2 that ``the loop/transport combination originates at a customer's premises and terminates at the telecommunications carrier's collocation arrangement.''); Letter from
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.txt
                      • services offered in the "limited corridors" established by the District Court in United States v. Western Electric Co., Inc., 569 F. Supp. 1057, 1107 (D.D.C. 1983). (xx) Toll dialing parity. "Toll dialing parity" exists when there is dialing parity, as defined in � 51.5 of this chapter, for toll services. (yy) Loop-based services. Loop-based services are services that employ Subcategory 1.3 facilities, as defined in � 36.154 of this chapter. (zz) Zone Average Revenue per Line. The Price Cap CMT Revenue per Line allocated to a particular state-defined zone used for deaveraging of UNE loop prices. The Zone Average Revenue per Line is computed according to the following formula: Zone Average Revenue Per Line = (25% * (Loopzone price + (Port)price))+
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00199.doc
                      • Communications Commission Washington, D.C. In the Matter of ) ) Puerto Rico Telephone Company ) ) CCB/CPD No. 99-36 Petition for Waiver of ) Section 61.41 or Section 54.303(a) ) of the Commission's Rules ) ORDER Adopted: June 2, 2000 Released: June 5, 2000 By the Commission: On December 10, 1999, Puerto Rico Telephone Company, Inc. (PRTC), pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, filed a petition for waiver of section 61.41 of the Commission's rules, as well as any other provisions that would prevent PRTC from remaining subject to rate-of-return regulation and in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) Common Line Pool (PRTC Petition). In its petition, PRTC alternatively requests a limited waiver of section 54.303(a) of the Commission's
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00204.doc
                      • USAC Letter at 2. The Administrator states that SLD's online filing capabilities were significantly enhanced for the Year 3 funding period, but online filing increased four-fold to about 28,000 of more than 36,000 Forms 471, significantly more than anticipated. USAC Letter at 2. USAC Letter at 3. USAC Letter at 4. USAC Letter at 4. USAC Letter at 3-4. Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, allows for waiver of Commission rules if special circumstances warrant deviation from the general rule and such deviation will serve the public interest. See Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular); WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (WAIT Radio),
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00238.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00238.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00238.txt
                      • of the other five months for both interfaces, and thus conclude that the single shortfalls do not appear to reflect a systemic problem. For the months of December 1999 to April 2000, SWBT returned order confirmation notices for unbundled loop orders in an average of 0.9, 1.2, 2.0, 1.4 and 1.4 hours for LEX, and 2.3, 1.6, 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3 hours for orders submitted via EDI. See SWBT Aggregated Performance Data, Measurement No. 6 (``Average Time to Return FOC (Hours) - Mechanized'') (UNE Loop 1-50) (LEX) at 271-No. 6b, and (EDI) at 271-No. 6d. SWBT's performance for these months with respect to order confirmation notices for UNE-P and resale orders averaged 1.2, 1.0, 1.0, 0.6 and 0.6 hours for LEX
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00260.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00260.txt
                      • 254 of the Act if schools are unable to receive the funding necessary to obtain telecommunications services and advanced services solely because of the possible irregular actions of a service provider. III. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1-4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 U.S.C. � 1.3, that the Year 3 filing window deadline established by the Schools and Libraries Division of the Universal Service Administrative Company pursuant to section 54.507(c) of the Commission's rules IS WAIVED for the affected applicants listened in Appendix A of this Order, and the Schools and Libraries Division shall take the steps outlined
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00290.pdf
                      • number of municipalities in the Boston area with which RCN has agreements to offer service. 2/28/00 Bell Atlantic announces the first widespread rollout of DSL service to homes on Boston's South Shore, to be completed by July 1, 2000. 3/23/00 National Grid USA completes the buyout of New England Electric Systems and indicates plans to offer high-speed Internet access to 1.3 million homes in New England, including Boston's South Shore. A. Cable Modem Services 18. The incumbent cable provider, MediaOne, provides video service, residential cable modem service, and telephony service in Waltham. MediaOne was the first provider of this package of services in the area, beginning in September 1996. MediaOne provides no separate services for businesses, and will not build out
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00326.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00326.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00326.txt
                      • Reply Comments at 3; PCIA Comments at 6. NENA Reply Comments at 4, 5; APCO Reply Comments at 1, 2. E911 Third Report and Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 17425. Id. See VoiceStream June 15 Ex Parte Comments at 15, indicating that hybrid E-OTD technology can eventually achieve the same 50-meter accuracy level required for handset-based solutions. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) citing WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969). See E911 First Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 18710, 18718. We emphasize that the filing of a waiver request does not and will not excuse noncompliance with our E911 rules. Moreover, carriers are
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00332.doc
                      • addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4, 201-205, 254, 303(r), and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154, 201-205, 254, 303(r), 403, and sections 1.3 and 1.429(k) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.429(k), this ORDER AND FURTHER NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING IS ADOPTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1 and 4(i) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), and sections 1.3 and 1.429(k) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.429(k), the application
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00336.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00336.txt
                      • to offer service). ALTS Comments at 2; DATA April 11, 2000 Ex Parte at 1-5; Comptel May 18, 2000 Ex Parte at 2; Jato May 23, 2000 Ex Parte at 4-5; see SBC Request at 6; SBC Reply at 5 (arguing that the Commisson can modify the conditions); MCIW Comments at 2 (citing 47 U.S.C. � 416(b), 47 C.F.R. � 1.3); DATA Reply at 5; SBC Ex parte (Mar. 3, 2000) (SBC March 3, 2000 Ex Parte) (citing Application of GTE Corporation and Southern Pacific Company for Consent to Transfer Control of Southern Pacific Communications Company and Southern Pacific Satellite Company, Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 84-254 (rel. June 4, 1984)); see also SBC/Ameritech Merger Order at para. 415 (noting the
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00379.doc
                      • Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ATU Telecommunications Request for Waiver of Sections 69.106(b) and 69.124(b)(1) of the Commission's Rules ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CPD 98-40 Adopted: October 18, 2000 Released: October 26, 2000 By the Commission I. INTRODUCTION On June 22, 1998, ATU Telecommunications (ATU) filed a petition pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules seeking a waiver of sections 69.106(b) and 69.124(b)(1) of the Commission's rules relating to the computation of the charge for the local switching rate element and the transport interconnection charge, respectively, in order to permit it to offer term and volume discounts for access to ATU's local switched network. ATU argues that the competition it faces
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010101.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010101.txt
                      • the statements of the Alaska Commission, we conclude that the Petitioners have demonstrated that grant of this waiver request serves the public interest. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by ATEAC, Inc., Alaska Telephone Company, Arctic Slope Telephone Association Cooperative, Inc., Interior Telephone Company, Inc., Mukluk Telephone Company, Inc., and United-KUC, Inc., on September 22, 2000, IS GRANTED, as described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010129.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010129.txt
                      • cap regulation no later than one year after acquiring the price cap access lines from Valor. Discussion For the reasons discussed below, we find that good cause exists for us to waive section 61.41(c)(2) of the Commission's rules, and that it would be in the public interest to grant Mescalero's waiver request. As discussed previously, the courts have interpreted section 1.3 of the Commission's rules to require a petitioner seeking a waiver of a Commission rule to demonstrate that special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, and that such a deviation will serve the public interest. Because Mescalero is significantly smaller than any of the carriers subject to mandatory price cap regulation, we find that special circumstances support a
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010146.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010146.txt
                      • 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). 47 C.F.R.� 1.7. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See e.g. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (``Waiver is [] appropriate if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, and such deviation would better serve the public interest than strict adherence to the general rule.''); 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. -146 -xxxx � � �
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010175.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010175.txt
                      • 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). 47 C.F.R.� 1.7. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See e.g. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (``Waiver is [] appropriate if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, and such deviation would better serve the public interest than strict adherence to the general rule.''); 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See Funding Commitment Decision Letter page 5. -175 -175 ... � � � �
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010316.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010316.txt
                      • C.F.R. � 54.720(b). 47 C.F.R.� 1.7. Letter from Renee C. Melby, Ashby Public Schools, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., filed December 15, 2000. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Renee Melby, Ashby Public Schools, dated December 20, 2000 (Administrator's Decision on Appeal). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. -316 -316 �
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010353.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010353.txt
                      • Tennessee of the Decision of the Universal Service Administrator, Request for Review by Integrated Systems and Internet Solutions, Inc., of the Decision of the Universal Service Administrator, Request for Review by Education Networks of America of the Decision of the Universal Service Administrator, CC Docket Nos. 96-45 and 97-21, Order, 14 FCC Rcd 13734 (1999) (Tennessee Order). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972); Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. Tennessee Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 13746-55, paras. 25-42. In the Tennessee Order, the Commission concluded that a facility located on an applicant's premises
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010410.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010410.txt
                      • make adjustments to their price cap indices to reflect cost changes resulting from rule waivers. We require USQwest to make such an adjustment. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Citizens Telecommunications Company of Wyoming and Qwest Corporation on August 21, 2000, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010507.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010507.txt
                      • NTCA and USTA support this waiver request. Discussion For the reasons discussed below, we find that good cause exists for us to waive section 61.41(c)(2) of the Commission's rules, and that it would be in the public interest to grant the waiver request of All West, Carbon/Emery, Central Utah, Hanksville, and UBET. As discussed previously, the courts have interpreted section 1.3 of the Commission's rules to require a petitioner seeking a waiver of a Commission rule to demonstrate that special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, and that such a deviation will serve the public interest. We find that special circumstances warrant a waiver of section 61.41(c)(2). In evaluating requests for waiver of section 61.41(c)(2), the Bureau has taken
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010509.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010509.txt
                      • By extending this deadline, we provide the independent auditor with more time to complete its work, thereby ensuring a complete and accurate draft audit report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 254 and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, the waiver request filed by the Universal Service Administrative Company on July 26, 2000 is GRANTED to the extent indicated herein to allow submission of the draft audit report for the year 2000 on or before April 15, 2001. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010612.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010612.txt
                      • after USAC receives all necessary information from the Wyoming Commission, whichever is later. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 254, sections 54.309 and 54.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 54.309, 54.311, and authority delegated by sections 0.291 and 1.3 of the Commission rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.291, 1.3, that the petition filed by the Wyoming Public Service Commission on March 30, 2000, is GRANTED to the extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this order is EFFECTIVE UPON RELEASE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See 47 C.F.R. �� 54.309, 54.311. Petition of
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010773.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010773.txt
                      • FCC Form 471 filing deadline. The record shows that Audrey Pack complied with the program's requirements in providing additional information to SLD on December 13, 2000. Thus, the untimely posting of the FCC Form 470 is not attributable to Audrey Pack. We therefore grant Audrey Pack's waiver request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Audrey Pack Memorial Library, Spring City, Tennessee on July 3, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent provide herein. We direct SLD to process Audrey Pack's FCC Form 471 as timely filed within the filing window. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G.
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010876.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010876.txt
                      • (affirming Universal Service First Report and Order in part and reversing and remanding on unrelated grounds), cert. denied, Celpage, Inc. v. FCC, 120 S. Ct. 2212 (May 30, 2000), cert. denied, AT&T Corp. v. Cincinnati Bell Tel. Co., 120 S. Ct. 2237 (June 5, 2000), cert. dismissed, GTE Service Corp. v. FCC, 121 S.Ct. 423 (Nov. 2, 2000). 47 C.F.R. �1.3. WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1158 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972) (WAIT Radio). Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular) WAIT Radio, 897 F.2d at 1157. Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.505(b)(1); Instructions for Completing the Schools and Libraries Universal Service,
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011119.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011119.txt
                      • Homer is subject to the funding priorities set forth in Section 54.507(c). We conclude that the particular facts of this case do rise to the level of special circumstances required for a deviation from the general rule. We, therefore, find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Homer Community Consolidated School District 33C, Lockport, Illinois, on July 6, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Letter from John Lavelle, Homer Community Consolidated School District 33C, Lockport, Illinois, to the Federal
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011120.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011120.txt
                      • applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, ICS fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We, therefore, find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Immaculate Conception School, Irvington-on-Hudson, New York, on July 24, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Louise Frangella, Immaculate Conception School, Irvington-on-Hudson, to Federal Communications Commission, filed on
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011251.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011251.txt
                      • actions of those employees to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely and proper requests for discounts on its behalf. Here, Danbury fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Danbury Public Schools, Danbury, Connecticut, on July 25, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Melanie C. Schroeder, Danbury Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed on July
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011252.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011252.txt
                      • applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Dummerston fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Dummerston Elementary School, Dummerston, Vermont, on August 24, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Betsy Whittaker, Dummerston Elementary School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed on August 24,
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011327.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011327.txt
                      • interest would be served by such a waiver. Accordingly, we grant South Slope's request for waiver of section 69.605(c) of the Commission's rules. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by South Slope Cooperative Telephone Company, Amana Colonies Telephone Company, d/b/a HickoryTech and Heartland Telecommunications Company of Iowa on December 13, 2000, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1,
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011504.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011504.txt
                      • window. Instead, the burden of ensuring that complete and accurate information is provided on the correct forms properly rests with applicants themselves. We therefore conclude that, under these circumstances, Fair Lawn has failed to make a showing warranting relief and, therefore, its Request for Waiver must be denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed June 22, 2000 by Fair Lawn Board of Education, Fair Lawn, New Jersey IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey, Deputy Chief Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Bruce Watson, Fair Lawn Board of Education, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011507.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011507.txt
                      • � 54.720(b). 47 C.F.R.� 1.7. Letter from Rabbi Michel Gurkov, Chabad Hebrew School, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., filed March 28, 2001. Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Rabbi Michel Gurkov, Chabad Hebrew School, dated March 30, 2001 (Administrator's Decision on Appeal). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See FCDL Re-Mail Advisory Cover Sheet Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Rabbi Michel Gurkov, Chabad Center Hebrew School, dated November 8, 2000. -1507 -1507 � � � �
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011536.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011536.txt
                      • to their price cap indices to reflect cost changes resulting from rule waivers. We require USQwest and Citizens to make such an adjustment. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Citizens Utilities Rural Company, Inc. and Qwest Corporation on December 20, 2000, IS DENIED AS FILED AND GRANTED AS DESCRIBED HEREIN. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011834.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011834.txt
                      • waiver of sections 36.611 and 36.612 of the Commission's rules. Consequently, San Carlos's request for accelerated high-cost loop support is denied. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition of San Carlos Apache Telecommunications Utility, Inc. for waiver of sections 36.611 and 36.612 of the Commission's rules IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Petition of San Carlos Apache Telecommunications Utility, Inc., for Waiver of Sections 36.611 and 36.612
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011881.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011881.txt
                      • window. Instead, the burden of ensuring that complete and accurate information is provided on the correct forms properly rests with applicants themselves. We therefore conclude that, under these circumstances, Chapel Hill has failed to make a showing warranting relief and, therefore, its Request for Waiver must be denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver, filed June 22, 2000 by Chapel Hill Independent School District, Tyler, Texas IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Rita Simpson, Chapel Hill Independent School District, to Federal Communications Commission,
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011898.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011898.txt
                      • close of the filing window. Instead, the burden of ensuring that complete and accurate information is provided on the correct forms properly rests with applicants themselves. We therefore conclude that Henry-Senachwine has failed to make a showing warranting relief and, therefore, its Request for Waiver must be denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed June 23, 2000 by Henry-Senachwine Community Unit District #5, Henry, Illinois IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark Seifert, Deputy Chief Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Beverly Privratsky, Henry-Senachwine Community Unit District 5, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011911.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011911.txt
                      • mandate to ensure that consumers in all regions of the Nation, including low-income consumers and those in rural, insular, and high-cost areas, have access to telecommunications and information services. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1-4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 U.S.C. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.809(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.809(c), filed by Smith Bagley, Inc. on July 16, 2001, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Smith Bagley, Inc. Petition For Waiver
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011977.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011977.txt
                      • filing window deadline is warranted. We therefore grant WASD's Waiver Request. We direct SLD to process WASD's FCC Form 471 as timely filed, and if otherwise appropriate, to issue an appropriate Funding Commitment Letter. However, we make no determination as to whether WASD is ultimately entitled to discounts. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by West Allegheny School District, Imperial, Pennsylvania on June 30, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent provide herein, and WASD's application is REMANDED to SLD for further consideration in light of this decision. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief,
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012016.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012016.txt
                      • must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, New Paltz fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by New Paltz Central School District, New Paltz, New York, on February 29, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Deborah Brush, New Paltz Central School District, to Federal
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012017.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012017.txt
                      • those employees or agents to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely and proper requests for discounts on its behalf. Here, Painesville fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Painesville City Schools, Painesville, Ohio, on February 28, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from James R. Fodor, Painesville City Local Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed February
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012019.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012019.txt
                      • or agents to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely and proper requests for discounts on its behalf. Here, St. Ignatius Loyola fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by St. Ignatius Loyola Academy, Baltimore, Maryland, on September 27, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Jeffrey R. Sindler, Saint Ignatius Loyola Academy, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012020.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012020.txt
                      • applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Stephen/Argyle fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by the Stephen/Argyle Central School District, Stephen, Minnesota, on February 26, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Melanie K. Stark, Stephen/Argyle Central School District, to Federal Communications Commission,
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012023.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012023.txt
                      • those employees or agents to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely and proper requests for discounts on its behalf. Here, Winchendon fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by the Winchendon School, Winchendon, Massachusetts, on June 30, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from C. Jackson Blair, the Winchendon School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed June 30,
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012024.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012024.txt
                      • applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Ballard fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by the Ballard Community School District, Huxley, Iowa, on February 20, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Connie Marker, Ballard Community School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012025.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012025.txt
                      • applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Elgin fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by the Elgin Independent School District, Elgin, Texas, on November 17, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Barbara Allbright, Elgin Independent School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012027.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012027.txt
                      • applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Renaissance fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Renaissance Charter School, Moscow, Idaho on March 20, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Carol Kampenhout, Renaissance Charter School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed March 20, 2001
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012087.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012087.txt
                      • assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, St. Jean Vianney fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by St. Jean Vianney School, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on October 31, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Patrice A. Robinson, St. Jean Vianney School, to Federal Communications Commission,
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012137.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012137.txt
                      • Central's request for a retroactive waiver of the 30-day appeal deadline for Funding Year 1 applicants who filed untimely appeals, E-Rate Central's request that we also authorize new appeal funding procedures for these applicants is moot. We therefore dismiss this part of the Request for Waiver as well. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed E-Rate Central, Plandome, New York, on August 12, 1999, is DENIED-IN-PART AND DISMISSED-IN-PART. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Winston E. Himsworth, E-Rate Central, to Federal Communications Commission, filed August 12, 1999 (Request
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012185.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012185.txt
                      • applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Watonwan fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by the Watonwan County Library, St. James, Minnesota, on July 11, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Cheryl Bjoin, Watonwan County Library, to Federal Communications Commission, filed July
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012276.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012276.txt
                      • application number 127047 because the record shows that Sperry failed to complete this application. Because there is no completed FCC Form 471 for application number 127045, and because Sperry has failed to demonstrate special circumstances that would so necessitate, a waiver of the filing window is not warranted. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed by Sperry Public Schools, Sperry, Oklahoma, on October 7, 1999 IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from David Jobe, Sperry Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed October 7,
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012328.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012328.txt
                      • must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Bear Lake fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Bear Lake County Library District, Montpelier, Idaho, on November 3, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Mary Nate, Bear Lake County Library District, to Federal Communications Commission,
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012330.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012330.txt
                      • the SLD website was incorrect. Thus, we find that SLD's posting of an incorrect zip code contributed to the untimely filing by West Las Vegas of its FCC Form 471. We therefore conclude that West Las Vegas has demonstrated special circumstances upon which to grant its waiver request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by West Las Vegas Schools, Las Vegas, New Mexico, on June 26, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent provide herein. We direct SLD to process West Las Vegas's FCC Form 471 as timely filed within the filing window. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012332.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012332.txt
                      • applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Midland fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by the Midland School District, Pleasant Plains, Arkansas, on February 15, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Jim LaRue, Midland School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed February
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012333.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012333.txt
                      • applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Montville fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by the Montville Township Public Schools, Montville, New Jersey, on March 23, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Dominic J. Butler, Montville Township Public Schools, to Federal Communications
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012372.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012372.txt
                      • filing window. Instead, the burden of ensuring that complete and accurate information is provided on the correct forms properly rests with applicants themselves. We therefore conclude that, under these circumstances, Elkhart has failed to make a showing warranting relief and, therefore, its Request for Review must be denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review, filed July 10, 2000 by Elkhart Community Schools, Elkhart, Indiana IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Robert Woods, Elkhart Community Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed July 10, 2000
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012399.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012399.txt
                      • the filing window. Instead, the burden of ensuring that complete and accurate information is provided on the correct forms properly rests with applicants themselves. We therefore conclude that, under these circumstances, Garfield has failed to make a showing warranting relief and, therefore, its Waiver Request must be denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed April 17, 2000 by Garfield School District, Garfield, New Jersey IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert, Deputy Chief Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Raymond Hryczyk, Garfield School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed April 17,
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012401.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012401.txt
                      • Form 470, SLD should have notified Lettie Jensen of the signature deficiency in the form in time for Lettie Jensen to submit an in-window FCC Form 471 that complied with the competitive bidding rules. We therefore further find that good cause exists to grant Lettie Jensen's Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Lettie W. Jensen Library, Amherst, Wisconsin, on February 26, 2001 IS GRANTED to the extent provide herein, and Lettie Jensen's application is REMANDED to SLD for further consideration in light of this decision. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01013.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01013.txt
                      • unserved areas of the Mescalero Apache Reservation. We will not, however, routinely grant waiver of this rule and those seeking a waiver of section 54.305 will bear a heavy burden. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 254, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.305 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.305 filed by Mescalero Apache Telecom, Inc., IS GRANTED, as described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Magalie Roman Salas Secretary Mescalero Apache Telecom Inc., GTE Southwest Incorporated, and Valor Telecommunications of New Mexico, LLC, Joint Petition for Waiver
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01029.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01029.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01029.txt
                      • information no weight in determining section 271 compliance. An exception to this approach exists for new information that is directly responsive to allegations raised in the comments. The Commission has also strictly limited the consideration of developments that occur after the date for filing comments. In this proceeding, we waive these procedural requirements on our own motion pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, to the extent necessary to consider rate reductions filed by SWBT on day 63 of the 90-day period for Commission review of the Kansas and Oklahoma section 271 applications. ``[A] waiver is appropriate only if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule and such deviation will serve the public interest.'' We conclude that the
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01086.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01086.txt
                      • program years, it should take steps to ensure that all applicable certifications necessary to secure federal high-cost support are filed with the Commission before the expiration of the applicable filing deadline. III. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1-4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 U.S.C. � 1.3, that the Petition for waiver of section 54.313(c)(2)(i) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 54.313(c)(2)(i), filed by the West Virginia Public Service Commission on January 29, 2001, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Magalie Roman Salas Secretary Public Service Commission of West Virginia's Request for Leave to
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.txt
                      • for DSL loops in Massachusetts. These results further support our conclusion that Verizon provides competing carriers with maintenance and repair service in substantially the same time and manner as Verizon's own retail operations. Competing carriers experienced a trouble report rate of 1.9 percent for the months of September through December 2000 while Verizon experienced trouble report rates at a comparable 1.3 percent rate. See MR 2-02/2-03 (Maintenance, 2-Wire xDSL Services, Network Trouble Report Rate, Loop; Network Trouble Report Rate, Central Office). Although nondiscriminatory access to subloops technically falls under checklist item 2, we treat subloops in this section because it is logically related to the provision of unbundled loops. UNE Remand Order at para. 206. The Commission held that technically feasible
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01162.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01162.txt
                      • that a mandatory categories freeze for all rate-of-return carriers would provide disincentives for these carriers to deploy new technologies due to insufficient cost recovery. Furthermore, the Joint Board recognized that a categories freeze may have a negative impact on some rate-of-return carriers' current universal service high cost support levels. The Joint Board noted that COE Category 4.13 and CW&F Category 1.3 are included in the current Universal Service High Cost Loop formula that is used for the rate-of-return carriers under Part 36. The investment levels in these two categories may increase for rate-of-return carriers as new technologies are deployed, such as facilities to provide DSL services. If the category relationships are frozen at the current year level, rate-of-return carriers may not
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01268.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01268.txt
                      • those costs from their customers. Although we dismiss Federal Transtel's petition, we will incorporate a copy of its petition into the record relating to the Contribution Methodology NPRM. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 254, and 405 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 254, and 405, and sections 1.3, 1.429 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.429, that the Petition for Waiver or Reconsideration filed July 20, 1999 by Federal Transtel, Inc. IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Magalie Roman Salas Secretary Petition of Federal Transtel, Inc. for Waiver or, in the Alternative, for Reconsideration, CC Docket No. 96-45, filed on July 20, 1999 (Federal Transtel Petition). See
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2002/fcc02331.pdf
                      • the retail analog applied, making it difficult to compare data over time. Metric SQM No.Metric Name Metric SQM No.Metric Name RESALE A.3.5 M&R-5Out of Service > 24 hours Ordering Billing A.1.1 O-7 % Rejected Service Requests � Mech. A.4.1 B-1 Invoice Accuracy A.1.2 O-7 % Rejected Service Requests - Partially Mech. A.4.2 B-2 Mean Time to Deliver Invoices � CRIS A.1.3 O-7 % Rejected Service Requests - Non-Mech. UNBUNDLED NETWORK ELEMENTS A.1.4 O-8 Reject Interval � Mech. Ordering A.1.7 O-8 Reject Interval - Partially Mech. � 10 hours B.1.1 O-7/O-13% Rejected Service Requests � Mech. A.1.8 O-8 Reject Interval - Non-Mech. B.1.2 O-7/O-13% Rejected Service Requests - Partially Mech. A.1.9 O-9 FOC Timeliness � Mech. B.1.3 O-7/O-13% Rejected Service Requests -
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da971957.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da971957.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da971957.wp
                      • the report are available for review and copying at the FCC Reference Center, Room 239, 1919 M Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20554 or on the Internet at www.ed.gov/Technology. Procedure for Filing Comments should be filed in CC Docket No. 96-45 on or before September 25, 1997, and should include the DA number shown on this Public Notice. Pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, we find good cause to waive Section 1.415 (c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.415, providing for replies to original comments. Dispensing with reply comments is crucial due to the urgent need to provide definitive guidance to the schools, libraries, and rural health care providers that are applying for services supported by
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da972623.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da972623.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da972623.wp
                      • projections of demand and administrative expenses are as follows (revised figures are in bold): ($ millions) Program Program Demand Administrative Expenses Interest Income Total Program Costs Schools and Libraries 299.3 2.7 (2.0) 300.0 Rural Health Care 23.0 2.2[24]^(21) (0.2) 25.0 Subtotal 322.3 4.9 (2.2) 325.0 High Cost 434.0 1.1 (1.0) 434.1 Low Income 125.0 0.6 (0.3) 125.3 Subtotal 559.0 1.7 (1.3) 559.4 TOTAL 881.3 6.6 (3.5) 884.4 Based on information contained in the Universal Service Worksheets, FCC Form 457, USAC submitted the following information regarding end-user telecommunications revenues on November 13, 1997: Total Interstate, Intrastate, and International End-User Telecommunications Revenues from January 1, 1997 - June 30, 1997: $89.827 billion Total Interstate and International End-User Telecommunications Revenues from January 1, 1997
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/cr980413.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/cr980413.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/cr980413.wp
                      • SLC, and RHCC submitted the following projections of second quarter 1998 demand and administrative expenses: ($ millions) Program Program Demand Administrative Expenses Interest Income12 Total Program Costs Schools and Libraries 322.4 4.4 (1.8) 325.0 Rural Health Care 23.2 1.9 (0.1) 25.0 Subtotal 345.6 6.3 (1.9) 350.0 High Cost 431.1 0.9 (0.9) 431.1 Low Income 122.3 0.4 (0.3) 122.4 Subtotal 553.4 1.3 (1.2) 553.5 TOTAL 899.0 7.6 (3.1) 903.5 Based on information contained in the Universal Service Worksheets, FCC Form 457, USAC submitted end-user telecommunications revenues for the first half of 1997 on January 30, 1998. On February 24, 1998, USAC revised these revenue estimates to reflect newly-filed or revised Form 457 submissions and to exclude revenues from contributors that the Commission
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980413.html
                      • SLC, and RHCC submitted the following projections of second quarter 1998 demand and administrative expenses: ($ millions) Program Program Demand Administrative Expenses Interest Income[17]^(12) Total Program Costs Schools and Libraries 322.4 4.4 (1.8) 325.0 Rural Health Care 23.2 1.9 (0.1) 25.0 Subtotal 345.6 6.3 (1.9) 350.0 High Cost 431.1 0.9 (0.9) 431.1 Low Income 122.3 0.4 (0.3) 122.4 Subtotal 553.4 1.3 (1.2) 553.5 TOTAL 899.0 7.6 (3.1) 903.5 Based on information contained in the Universal Service Worksheets, FCC Form 457, USAC submitted end-user telecommunications revenues for the first half of 1997 on January 30, 1998. On February 24, 1998, USAC revised these revenue estimates to reflect newly-filed or revised Form 457 submissions and to exclude revenues from contributors that the Commission
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da992963.doc
                      • media information 202/418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202/418-2830 TTY 202/418-0484 202/418-0485 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov Released: December 21, 1999 Puerto Rico Telephone Company, Inc. Petitions for Waiver of Parts 61 and 69 of the Commission's Rules Pleading Cycle Established CCB/CPD NO. 99-36 COMMENTS: January 11, 2000 REPLY COMMENTS: January 21, 2000 On December 10, 1999, Puerto Rico Telephone Company, Inc. (PRTC), pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, filed a petition for waiver of section 61.41 of the Commission's rules, and any other provisions necessary for it to remain subject to rate-of-return regulation and in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) Common Line Pool. If the Commission does not grant a waiver of section 61.41, PRTC requests a limited waiver of section 54.303(a) of
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001811.doc
                      • telephone does not meet some of the technical requirements of this section. A request for waiver of one or more requirements of Part 68 does not excuse an applicant from meeting the requirements for which the applicant did not request waiver. The Commission will not waive any provision of its rules unless good cause is shown, see 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Under the relevant case law, the applicant has the burden of showing good cause for a waiver: "[a]n applicant [for a waiver] faces a high hurdle even at the starting gate." WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969). Nevertheless, an agency must take a "hard look" at applications for waiver, id., and must consider all relevant
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002131.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002131.txt
                      • of the Local Competition Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. The Order sets out the requirements regarding the ability of requesting carriers to use combinations of unbundled network elements (UNEs) to provide local exchange and exchange access service prior to the Commission's resolution of the Fourth Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in this docket. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 and paragraph 23 of the Order, WorldCom petitions for a waiver of three provisions of the Order so that it may convert local circuits leased under the incumbent local exchange carriers' special access tariffs to UNE combinations. These provisions are (1) the restriction on co-mingling of loops or loop-transport combinations with tariffed special access services; (2) the local usage requirements
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002912.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002912.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002912.txt
                      • of Michigan, Public Notice, DA 97-127 (Jan. 17, 1997); Revised Procedures for Bell Operating Company Applications Under Section 271 of the Communications Act, Public Notice, 13 FCC Rcd 17457 (Sept. 19, 1997); Updated Filing Requirements for Bell Operating Company Applications Under Section 271 of the Communications Act, Public Notice, DA-99-1994 (Sept. 28, 1999) (collectively ``271 Procedural Public Notices''). See section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Ameritech Michigan Order at 20575, para. 57; Application of Bell Atlantic New York for Authorization Under Section 271 of the Communications Act To Provide In-Region, InterLATA Service in the State of New York, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 3953, 3968, para. 34 (1999). See 271 Procedural Public Notices. PUBLIC NOTICE
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Fiber/fiber96.pdf
                      • Table 12: Fiber and Copper in Total Plant in Relation to Access Lines -- End of Year 1996 * Total Plant Per Thousand Access Lines Access Lines Strand Miles Sheath Miles Miles Miles Miles Miles Percent Fiber Company (thousands)** (thousands) Copper Fiber CopperFiber Fiber Copper Fiber Copper Fiber Wire Strand SheathSheathSheath Ameritech 22,998 193,775 1,339 327,400 29,600 8,426 58.2 14.2 1.3 8.3% Bell Atlantic 22,017 194,315 2,403 287,092 38,985 8,825 109.2 13.0 1.8 12.0% BellSouth 24,493 247,482 2,012 586,008 55,981 10,104 82.1 23.9 2.3 8.7% NYNEX 19,119 160,184 1,423 255,115 27,939 8,378 74.4 13.3 1.5 9.9% Pacific Telesis 20,521 157,099 540 203,334 13,369 7,656 26.3 9.9 0.7 6.2% SBC 17,602 174,119 1,504 383,947 34,419 9,892 85.5 21.8 2.0 8.2% US West
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Fiber/infra98.pdf
                      • 92,493 109,465 116,568 122,344 130,778 135,981 Total Switches Equipped with ISDN 920 1,219 1,874 2,400 2,868 3,329 3,902 4,146 Lines with Access to ISDN (000) 20,565 28,376 39,875 56,546 71,274 85,435 95,956 106,834 Basic Rate ISDN (BRI) Interfaces Equipped 289,292 468,667 560,820 738,506 948,1301,409,4061,670,3082,393,662 Primary Rate ISDN (PRI) Interfaces Equipped 1,653 2,672 4,920 14,120 29,877 60,508 119,768 310,129 7 Table 1.3 Switching Data Ameritech Companies 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 Gross Plant Expenditures (Millions) $1,877 $1,716 $1,719 $1,517 $1,578 $1,997 $1,912 $2,250 Local Switches 1,421 1,433 1,422 1,413 1,415 1,410 1,435 1,419 Tandems 49 46 47 47 46 46 47 51 Hosts 224 178 230 236 238 236 243 236 Remotes (Stand Alone Only) 654 666 684 717
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Fiber/infra99.pdf
                      • 130,778 135,981 139,271 Total Switches Equipped with ISDN 920 1,219 1,874 2,400 2,868 3,329 3,902 4,146 4,352 Lines with Access to ISDN (000) 20,565 28,376 39,875 56,546 71,274 85,435 95,956 106,834 112,103 Basic Rate ISDN (BRI) Interfaces Equipped 289,292 468,667 560,820 738,506 948,1301,409,4061,670,3082,352,0382,552,907 Primary Rate ISDN (PRI) Interfaces Equipped 1,653 2,672 4,920 14,120 29,877 60,508 119,768 198,129 287,322 8 Table 1.3 Switching Data SBC Ameritech Companies 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Total Gross Capital Expenditures (Millions) $1,877 $1,716 $1,719 $1,517 $1,578 $1,997 $1,912 $2,250 $2,244 Local Switches 1,421 1,433 1,422 1,413 1,415 1,410 1,435 1,419 1,432 Tandems 49 46 47 47 46 46 47 51 52 Hosts 224 178 230 236 238 236 243 236 234 Remotes
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/hspd1208_tables.doc
                      • 8.9 13.0 7.1 20.6 29.9 26.6 2.4 0.4 0.0 87.0 100.0 sDSL 0.0 0.0 0.0 49.6 29.6 * 1.2 0.0 * 0.0 100.0 100.0 Other Wireline 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.8 48.5 19.8 3.4 18.9 0.6 0.0 100.0 100.0 Cable Modem 1.0 1.4 2.5 0.8 2.9 4.2 14.6 53.4 21.5 0.2 97.5 100.0 FTTP 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.5 1.1 2.0 25.0 1.3 69.4 0.6 99.8 100.0 Satellite 56.1 32.2 88.3 * * * * 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.7 100.0 Fixed Wireless 14.1 4.8 18.9 21.2 22.5 25.2 8.7 1.7 1.8 0.1 81.1 100.0 Mobile Wireless 28.8 13.0 41.8 30.1 21.5 6.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 58.2 100.0 Power Line and Other 0.0 0.0 0.0 * * * * 0.0 * 0.0 100.0
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ias0609_tables.doc
                      • 100% 100% or more aDSL 4.4 10.2 10.3 26.3 20.9 13.4 7.0 3.4 2.5 0.8 0.9 sDSL 94.5 5.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Other Wireline 99.3 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cable Modem 6.9 4.5 5.1 14.9 17.2 16.2 13.7 9.4 8.3 2.2 1.6 FTTP 85.2 5.4 1.6 2.4 1.9 1.3 1.0 0.6 0.5 0.1 0.1 Satellite 45.7 50.9 2.7 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Fixed Wireless 0.0 86.7 10.8 1.3 0.8 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Power Line 99.9 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 All Other 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 0.9 0.6 0.9
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ias0611_tables.doc
                      • * 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.6 100.0 Fixed Wireless 5.7 2.8 8.5 12.8 23.4 30.2 19.9 4.4 0.8 0.1 91.5 100.0 Mobile Wireless 8.5 5.7 14.2 27.6 28.8 * 3.1 5.1 * 0.0 85.8 100.0 Power Line and Other 0.0 0.0 0.0 * * * * 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 Total 5.3 4.3 9.6 15.8 18.6 17.4 8.4 8.5 20.4 1.3 90.4 100.0 # = Rounds to Zero. * = Data withheld to maintain firm confidentiality. Note: Figures may not sum to totals due to rounding. Source: FCC Form 477, Part I. Table 14 Nationwide Number of Providers of Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction by Technology 2007-2011 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Technology Jun Dec Jun Dec
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ias1209_tables.doc
                      • than 100% 100% or more aDSL 1.1 2.3 6.1 28.9 31.0 19.9 7.0 2.3 0.7 0.3 0.3 sDSL 79.2 19.3 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Other Wireline 92.6 7.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cable Modem 12.7 12.2 11.5 20.0 18.8 12.8 7.6 3.2 1.0 0.1 0.0 FTTP 67.6 24.8 2.8 2.4 1.3 0.7 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Satellite 0.9 89.0 8.7 1.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Fixed Wireless 51.4 39.6 5.4 2.6 0.7 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Power Line 99.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 All Other 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 0.1 0.5
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ias1210_tables.doc
                      • 100% or more aDSL 4.9 10.2 11.1 25.6 20.4 13.2 7.5 3.4 2.4 0.7 0.7 sDSL 95.1 4.6 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Other Wireline 98.8 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cable Modem 6.4 4.2 4.3 13.2 16.7 16.3 14.1 10.5 9.5 2.7 2.1 FTTP 80.7 7.6 1.7 2.7 2.0 1.7 1.3 1.0 0.9 0.3 0.2 Satellite 46.4 48.6 3.7 1.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Fixed Wireless 85.4 11.6 1.6 1.0 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Power Line 99.9 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 All Other 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 0.7 0.4 0.6 3.5
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/lcom0501.pdf
                      • state were not required to report. 2/ Percentage of mobile wireless subscribers receiving their service from a mobile wireless reseller. Table 9 Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers Number of CLECs June 2000 December 2000 0 46.2 % 44.5 % 1 19.8 17.0 2 9.1 10.3 3 6.8 7.2 4 5.1 5.3 5 3.9 4.1 6 2.4 2.9 7 1.7 2.3 8 1.3 1.7 9 1.1 1.4 10 or More 2.6 3.4 Table 11 Households in Zip Codes with Competitive Local Exchange Carriers Households Percentage Households Percentage 14,039,322 13.6 12,514,914 12.1 14,055,272 13.6 11,054,909 10.7 12,244,926 11.8 11,034,005 10.7 12,670,581 12.3 12,118,475 11.7 11,846,579 11.5 11,512,655 11.1 10,072,717 9.7 9,891,501 9.6 6,565,183 6.4 7,307,707 7.1 4,651,512 4.5 6,324,420 6.1 3,820,321 3.7 4,993,994 4.8
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/lcom1200.pdf
                      • confidentiality. ILEC CLEC (As of June 30, 2000) State Reporting Carriers 1/ Subscribers Percentage of Nation Population 2/Subscribers per Capita Alabama 11 1,253,084 1.4 % 4,370 0.29 Alaska 4 169,892 0.2 620 0.27 Arizona 11 1,624,668 1.8 4,778 0.34 Arkansas 5 715,467 0.8 2,551 0.28 California 12 12,283,369 13.6 33,145 0.37 Colorado 8 1,654,989 1.8 4,056 0.41 Connecticut 6 1,136,618 1.3 3,282 0.35 Delaware 6 275,219 0.3 754 0.37 District of Columbia 5 333,815 0.4 519 0.64 Florida 11 4,983,478 5.5 15,111 0.33 Georgia 13 2,687,238 3.0 7,788 0.35 Hawaii 7 454,364 0.5 1,185 0.38 Idaho 4 296,066 0.3 1,252 0.24 Illinois 12 4,309,660 4.8 12,128 0.36 Indiana 11 1,717,378 1.9 5,943 0.29 Iowa 6 975,629 1.1 2,869 0.34 Kansas 9
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/lcomp98.pdf
                      • provided to other carriers and 6.3% of such services provided to end users. This reflects the fact that CAPs concentrated on providing special access type services to business customers when they first entered the market and that these services continue to represent significant parts of their businesses. 10 Chart 2.1 Fiber Miles 7.5 9.0 10.7 12.3 14.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 1.3 1.8 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 Millions of Fiber Miles Incumbent LECs New Entrants Chart 2.2 Percentage Growth In Fiber Systems 32% 20% 19% 15% 14% 88% 72% 62% 104% 39% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 Growth Rate Incumbent LECs New Entrants Table 2.1
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/lcomp99-1.pdf
                      • available on the World Wide Web at . 19 Tables 2.3 and 2.4 do not contain about $2.3 billion of revenue from carriers that were considered de minimis for universal service contribution purposes. 12 [Note to electronic version: This page intentionally not numbered and left blank.] 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 7.5 0.2 9.0 0.4 3.1 16.1 1.8 14.0 1.3 12.3 10.7 0.6 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 Millions of Fiber Miles Chart 2.1 Fiber Miles Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers Competitive Access Providers 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 32% 88% 20% 72% 72% 15% 39% 14% 104% 15% 19% 62% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% Growth Rate Chart 2.2 Percentage Growth In
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ldrpt101.pdf
                      • Total Market Carrier Revenues In 1999, long distance carriers generated approximately $99 billion in toll revenues. Local telephone companies also provide toll service, primarily intrastate calling within their service territories. In 1999, local telephone companies provided over $9 billion of such service. When combined, the total long distance market was more than $108 billion. These revenues are shown in Table 1.3 Toll calls can be divided into three jurisdictional categories--intrastate, interstate, and international. The revenues for each of the three types of calls are shown in Table 2.4 Of considerable interest is the enormous growth (more than 500%) in international revenues from 1984 to 1999. Toll revenues divided between residential and nonresidential services are shown in Table 3.5 In 1999, residential
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ldrpt103.pdf
                      • 6,859 Ordinary Long Distance and Other Switched 6.9 8.4 9.4 13.9 12.0 1,702 2,271 1,692 1,218 1,015 Private Line 1.2 1.9 2.1 5.2 4.7 3,111 2,275 1,589 3,469 2,403 Other Toll Revenues 2 1.8 1.7 2.3 0.5 0.4 All Toll Revenues Provided for Resale 10.6 12.3 14.0 20.3 18.1 1,270 1,675 1,225 1,359 1,044 End-User Services: Prepaid Card 0.9 1.2 1.3 1.2 0.9 1,725 1,526 1,098 1,105 1,176 Operator Services 9.2 8.9 6.5 8.0 7.0 3,859 3,537 2,688 3,580 2,999 Ordinary Long Distance and Other Switched 52.5 56.1 59.6 53.0 45.5 3,387 3,225 3,260 2,781 2,832 Private Line 8.2 8.5 9.7 8.8 9.6 3,450 3,904 3,427 3,951 3,587 Other Toll Revenues 2 5.2 1.4 4.0 5.6 6.4 All Toll Revenues Provided
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/mksh3q98.pdf
                      • 0.0% 4.3 DEC 77.4 11.7 6.4 0.1 4.5 1990JUNE 76.2 12.9 6.2 0.1 4.7 DEC 75.6 13.2 6.6 0.1 4.6 1991JUNE 75.4 13.1 6.5 0.1 4.8 DEC 75.0 13.5 6.2 0.2 5.0 1992JUNE 74.2 14.0 6.2 0.2 5.4 DEC 73.0 14.5 6.4 0.3 5.8 1993JUNE 72.4 15.1 6.1 0.7 5.8 DEC 71.2 15.3 6.5 1.2 5.8 1994JUNE 70.5 15.3 6.4 1.3 6.5 DEC 70.0 14.8 6.4 1.3 7.4 1995JUNE 68.2 15.6 6.4 2.4 7.4 DEC 66.4 15.7 6.4 2.7 8.8 1996JUNE 64.0 15.6 7.0 2.6 10.8 DEC 63.3 14.5 7.4 2.7 12.1 PRESUBSCRIBED TELEPHONE LINES 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 Dec-87 Jun-89 Dec-90 Jun-92 Dec-93 Jun-95 Dec-96 (MILLIONS) AT&T MCI&SPRINT ALL OTHER 9 TABLE 2.3 -
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/mksh4q98.pdf
                      • 0.0% 4.3 DEC 77.4 11.7 6.4 0.1 4.5 1990JUNE 76.2 12.9 6.2 0.1 4.7 DEC 75.6 13.2 6.6 0.1 4.6 1991JUNE 75.4 13.1 6.5 0.1 4.8 DEC 75.0 13.5 6.2 0.2 5.0 1992JUNE 74.2 14.0 6.2 0.2 5.4 DEC 73.0 14.5 6.4 0.3 5.8 1993JUNE 72.4 15.1 6.1 0.7 5.8 DEC 71.2 15.3 6.5 1.2 5.8 1994JUNE 70.5 15.3 6.4 1.3 6.5 DEC 70.0 14.8 6.4 1.3 7.4 1995JUNE 68.2 15.6 6.4 2.4 7.4 DEC 66.4 15.7 6.4 2.7 8.8 1996JUNE 64.0 15.6 7.0 2.6 10.8 DEC 63.3 14.5 7.4 2.7 12.1 PRESUBSCRIBED TELEPHONE LINES 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 Dec-87 Jun-89 Dec-90 Jun-92 Dec-93 Jun-95 Dec-96 (MILLIONS) AT&T MCI&SPRINT ALL OTHER 9 TABLE 2.3 -
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/quarterly_roll-upsasof110110.pdf
                      • 1,112.1 19.3 4,454.5 4,509.6 1.2 4,383.0 2.8 Personal Communications Service (PCS) and SMR Telephony Carriers Paging & Messaging Service Providers 47.1 * 33.8 37.3 10.3 37.1 0.5 Specialized Mobile Radio (SMR) Dispatch * * 4.5 4.6 1.1 4.4 2.9 Wireless Data and Other Mobile Service 47.0 14.3 41.1 42.2 2.5 40.7 3.5 Providers Wireless Service Providers 1,206.3 34.4 4,534.0 4,593.6 1.3 4,465.2 2.8 Interexchange Carriers (IXCs) 3,321.8 425.0 8,786.5 8,494.1 -3.3 8,128.9 4.3 Operator Service Providers (OSPs) 7.4 1.0 49.4 49.3 -0.2 43.6 11.7 Prepaid Calling Card Providers 1.1 * 14.0 13.9 -0.7 13.6 1.6 Satellite Service Providers 37.4 59.5 59.3 -0.3 54.8 7.6 Toll Resellers 346.3 84.0 1,142.7 1,349.3 18.1 1,275.7 5.5 Other Toll Carriers 8/ 463.1 43.8 76.4 76.8
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
                      • Analysis Division, in April 2001, which is also available on the FCC-State Link... ii Table of Contents Executive Summary...................................................................................v I. Rates........................................................................................................................................1 A. Local Service Rates...........................................................................................................1 1. Residential Rates...................................................................................................1 Table 1.1 Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas (As of October 15, 2001)......................................................3 Table 1.2 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas (As of October 15), 1986-2001........................4 Table 1.3 Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities (As of October 15, 2001)......................................................5 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities (As of October 15), 1990-2001...................................7 Table 1.5 Connection Charges for a Residential Telephone Line in the Sample Cities (As of October 15), 1990-2001.................9 2. Rates for Low-Income Households.....................................................................11 Table 1.6 Comparison of Standard Local Rates to Lifeline and
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
                      • Local Service Rates..........................................................................I-2 1. Residential Rates..........................................................................I-2 2. Rates for Low-Income Households.....................................................I-3 3. Business Rates.............................................................................I-3 B. Toll Service Rates............................................................................I-4 C. Additional Sources of Information on Local and Toll Rates...........................I-5 Table 1.1 Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas (As of October 15, 2002) Table 1.2 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas (As of October 15), 1986-2002 Table 1.3 Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities (As of October 15, 2002) Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities (As of October 15), 1990-2002 Table 1.5 Connection Charges for a Residential Telephone Line in the Sample Cities (As of October 15), 1990-2002 Table 1.6 Comparison of Standard Local Rates to Lifeline and LinkUp Rates (As of October
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
                      • Rates for Low-Income Households....................................................I-3 3. Business Rates............................................................................I-3 B. Standard Deviation Analysis of Residential Rates.......................................I-4 C. Toll Service Rates...........................................................................I-4 D. Additional Sources of Information on Local and Toll Rates..........................I-5 Table 1.1 Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas (As of October 15, 2003) Table 1.2 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas (As of October 15), 1986-2003 Table 1.3 Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities (As of October 15, 2003) Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities (As of October 15), 1993-2003 Table 1.5 Connection Charges for a Residential Telephone Line in the Sample Cities (As of October 15), 1993-2003 Table 1.6 Comparison of Standard Local Rates to Lifeline and Link-Up Rates (As of October
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
                      • Rates for Low-Income Households....................................................I-3 3. Business Rates............................................................................I-3 B. Standard Deviation Analysis of Residential Rates.......................................I-4 C. Toll Service Rates...........................................................................I-4 D. Additional Sources of Information on Local and Toll Rates..........................I-5 Table 1.1 Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas (As of October 15, 2004) Table 1.2 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas (As of October 15), 1986-2004 Table 1.3 Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities (As of October 15, 2004) Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities (As of October 15), 1993-2004 Table 1.5 Connection Charges for a Residential Telephone Line in the Sample Cities (As of October 15), 1993-2004 Table 1.6 Comparison of Standard Local Rates to Lifeline and Link-Up Rates (As of October
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
                      • refer to the Industry Analysis Division's Trends in the U.S. International Telecommunications Industry, which is also available on the FCC-State Link. ii Table of Contents I. Rates for Local Service..........................................1 A. Rates in Urban Areas..........................................1 1. Residential Rates........................................1 Table 1.1 Residential Rates for Local Service as of October 15, 1997......................3 Table 1.2 Average Residential Rates for Local Service, 1986-1997.........................4 Table 1.3 Residential Rates in the Sample Cities as of October 15, 1997......................5 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Rates in the Sample Cities, 1990-1997..........................7 Table 1.5 Charges for Connection of a Residential Line in the Sample Cities, 1990-1997...........9 2. Rates for Low-Income Households..........................11 Table 1.6 Comparison of Standard Local Rates to Subsidized Rates.........................12 Table 1.7 Lifeline and Link-up Rates in the Sample Cities
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
                      • refer to the Industry Analysis Division's Trends in the U.S. International Telecommunications Industry, which is also available on the FCC-State Link. i Table of Contents I. Rates for Local Service.......................................1 A. Rates in Urban Areas......................................1 1. Residential Rates....................................1 Table 1.1 Residential Rates for Local Service as of October 15, 1998....................3 Table 1.2 Average Residential Rates for Local Service, 1986-1998.......................4 Table 1.3 Residential Rates in the Sample Cities as of October 15, 1998....................5 Table 1.4 Monthly Residential Rates in the Sample Cities, 1990-1998........................7 Table 1.5 Charges for Connection of a Residential Line in the Sample Cities, 1990-1998..........9 2. Rates for Low-Income Households.......................11 Table 1.6 Comparison of Standard Local Rates to Subsidized Rates.......................12 Table 1.7 Lifeline and Link-up Rates in the Sample Cities
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-98.pdf
                      • to Table 3.1 of the Monitoring Report for more details on the percentage of additional allocations of NTS costs to the interstate jurisdiction. 12 Administrative expenses and interest earnings of the administrator have been ignored in determining total contributions necessary to support the HCL mechanism. This same assumption also applies to LTS, LSS and low-income support funding estimates in Tables 1.3 � 1.9. 5 companies in the pool. The amount of LTS that a NECA pool member is eligible to receive in 1999 is the 1997 level of LTS (the difference between the 1997 CCL revenue requirements and the sum of 1997 CCL revenues using the NECA pool rate and 1997 subscriber line charge revenues) multiplied by the rate of growth
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-99.pdf
                      • LEC toll. LEC toll is assumed to be end-user toll. Intrastate toll revenues are reported in Table 1 and LEC toll in Table A-9. Region 1/ Percentage Point Difference Southeast 20.9% 21.6% 0.7 Western 12.1 12.8 0.7 West Coast 12.8 12.1 -0.7 Mid-Atlantic 13.1 13.5 0.4 Mid-West 14.9 15.6 0.7 Northeast 12.7 12.7 0.0 Southwest 12.2 11.8 -0.4 Non-Identified 2/ 1.3 0.0 -1.3 Nationwide 100.0% 100.0% 0.0 1/ States included in each region: 2/ Revenues from filers that did not identify region. Percentage of End-User Revenues by Region Table A-1 Southeast: Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, Puerto Rico, South Carolina, Tennessee, Northeast: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, Rhode Island, and Vermont. FCC Form 499-A Data State
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0300.pdf
                      • Month (March, July, November) Percent with Telephone N83M84J84N84M85J85N85M86J86N86M87J87N87M88J88N88M89J89N89M90J90N90M91J91N91M92J92N92M93J93N93M94J94N94M95J95N95M96J96N96M97J97N97M98J98N98M99J99N99M00 In Housing Unit Available Telephone Penetration Households 6 Table 2 Telephone Penetration by State (Percentage of Households with Telephone Service) State November 1983 March 2000 Change Alabama 87.9% 91.2% 3.3% Alaska 83.8 95.4 11.6 * Arizona 88.8 94.8 6.1 * Arkansas 88.2 90.1 1.9 California 91.7 95.6 3.9 * Colorado 94.4 95.7 1.3 Connecticut 95.5 95.8 0.3 Delaware 95.0 97.2 2.2 District of Columbia 94.7 90.8 -3.9 Florida 85.5 92.2 6.7 * Georgia 88.9 91.8 2.9 Hawaii 94.6 93.6 -1.0 Idaho 89.5 93.6 4.1 * Illinois 95.0 93.0 -2.0 Indiana 90.3 95.7 5.4 * Iowa 95.4 96.7 1.3 Kansas 94.9 94.6 -0.3 Kentucky 86.9 93.9 7.0 * Louisiana 88.9 90.8 1.9 Maine 90.7
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0302.pdf
                      • Minnesota 96.4 97.8 1.5 Mississippi 82.4 90.7 8.3 * Missouri 92.1 95.9 3.8 * Montana 92.8 96.2 3.4 * Nebraska 94.0 96.2 2.2 Nevada 89.4 96.4 7.0 * New Hampshire 95.0 97.6 2.6 New Jersey 94.1 95.6 1.5 New Mexico 85.3 92.7 7.4 * New York 90.8 95.6 4.8 * North Carolina 89.3 94.3 5.0 * North Dakota 95.1 96.4 1.3 Ohio 92.2 96.3 4.1 * Oklahoma 91.5 92.8 1.3 Oregon 91.2 97.3 6.1 * Pennsylvania 95.1 97.7 2.6 * Rhode Island 93.3 96.1 2.8 South Carolina 81.8 93.4 11.6 * South Dakota 92.7 95.1 2.4 Tennessee 87.6 93.6 6.0 * Texas 89.0 94.7 5.7 * Utah 90.3 96.6 6.3 * Vermont 92.7 98.0 5.3 * Virginia 93.1 96.6 3.5 *
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0398.pdf
                      • 85.5 93.3 7.8 * Georgia 88.9 89.9 1.0 Hawaii 94.6 95.1 0.6 Idaho 89.5 92.7 3.3 Illinois 95.0 92.7 -2.3 ** Indiana 90.3 93.8 3.4 * Iowa 95.4 96.6 1.2 Kansas 94.9 95.4 0.5 Kentucky 86.9 94.1 7.2 * Louisiana 88.9 93.5 4.6 * Maine 90.7 95.8 5.0 * Maryland 96.3 96.1 -0.2 Massachusetts 94.3 94.0 -0.3 Michigan 93.8 95.1 1.3 Minnesota 96.4 97.4 1.1 Mississippi 82.4 89.1 6.7 * Missouri 92.1 95.0 2.9 Montana 92.8 93.2 0.4 Nebraska 94.0 95.7 1.7 Nevada 89.4 93.0 3.6 New Hampshire 95.0 95.3 0.4 New Jersey 94.1 95.7 1.6 New Mexico 85.3 88.2 2.8 New York 90.8 95.2 4.4 * North Carolina 89.3 93.2 3.8 North Dakota 95.1 96.5 1.4 Ohio 92.2 95.9 3.7
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0399.pdf
                      • 95.1 3.9 * Pennsylvania 95.1 96.9 1.8 * Rhode Island 93.3 95.1 1.8 South Carolina 81.8 94.4 12.6 * South Dakota 92.7 91.3 -1.4 Tennessee 87.6 93.3 5.7 * Texas 89.0 92.2 3.2 * Utah 90.3 95.5 5.2 * Vermont 92.7 95.4 2.7 Virginia 93.1 93.1 -0.0 Washington 92.5 95.9 3.5 West Virginia 88.1 93.1 5.0 * Wisconsin 94.8 96.0 1.3 Wyoming 89.7 95.2 5.5 * Total United States 91.4 94.0 2.6 * * Increase is statistically significant at the 95% confidence level. ** Decrease is statistically significant at the 95% confidence level. Differences may not appear to equal changes due to rounding. 7 Chart 2 8 92.9% or less 93.0% - 95.0% 95.1% or more March 1999 Telephone Penetration Chart
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0701.pdf
                      • (March, July, November) Percent with Telephone N83M84J84N84M85J85N85M86J86N86M87J87N87M88J88N88M89J89N89M90J90N90M91J91N91M92J92N92M93J93N93M94J94N94M95J95N95M96J96N96M97J97N97M98J98N98M99J99N99M00J00N00M01J01 In Housing Unit Available Telephone Penetration Households 7 Table 2 Telephone Penetration by State (Percentage of Households with Telephone Service) State Alabama 87.9% 93.0% 5.1% * Alaska 83.8 94.7 10.9 * Arizona 88.8 93.5 4.8 * Arkansas 88.2 91.4 3.3 California 91.7 97.0 5.3 * Colorado 94.4 97.4 3.0 * Connecticut 95.5 96.8 1.3 Delaware 95.0 94.4 -0.6 District of Columbia 94.7 93.8 -0.9 Florida 85.5 93.2 7.7 * Georgia 88.9 93.2 4.3 * Hawaii 94.6 96.9 2.3 Idaho 89.5 94.1 4.6 * Illinois 95.0 93.7 -1.3 Indiana 90.3 95.0 4.7 * Iowa 95.4 97.2 1.8 Kansas 94.9 95.4 0.5 Kentucky 86.9 93.7 6.8 * Louisiana 88.9 94.5 5.6 * Maine 90.7 97.7 7.0
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0702.pdf
                      • 93.6 8.1 * Georgia 88.9 94.6 5.7 * Hawaii 94.6 96.4 1.8 Idaho 89.5 94.0 4.5 * Illinois 95.0 91.2 -3.8 Indiana 90.3 92.5 2.2 Iowa 95.4 96.5 1.1 Kansas 94.9 95.6 0.7 Kentucky 86.9 94.6 7.7 * Louisiana 88.9 92.7 3.8 * Maine 90.7 97.4 6.7 * Maryland 96.3 96.1 -0.2 Massachusetts 94.3 97.4 3.1 * Michigan 93.8 95.1 1.3 Minnesota 96.4 98.0 1.7 Mississippi 82.4 91.8 9.4 * Missouri 92.1 95.8 3.7 * Montana 92.8 94.9 2.1 Nebraska 94.0 95.3 1.3 Nevada 89.4 94.9 5.5 * New Hampshire 95.0 96.9 2.0 New Jersey 94.1 94.9 0.8 New Mexico 85.3 92.3 7.0 * New York 90.8 95.7 4.9 * North Carolina 89.3 94.4 5.1 * North Dakota 95.1 93.3 -1.8
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0703.pdf
                      • 88.9 94.7 5.8 * Hawaii 94.6 97.5 2.9 Idaho 89.5 95.8 6.3 * Illinois 95.0 91.3 -3.7 Indiana 90.3 92.8 2.5 Iowa 95.4 96.5 1.1 Kansas 94.9 95.3 0.4 Kentucky 86.9 96.0 9.1 * Louisiana 88.9 93.7 4.8 * Maine 90.7 97.3 6.6 * Maryland 96.3 97.2 0.9 Massachusetts 94.3 97.9 3.5 * Michigan 93.8 94.2 0.4 Minnesota 96.4 97.7 1.3 Mississippi 82.4 92.5 10.2 * Missouri 92.1 95.2 3.1 Montana 92.8 92.7 -0.1 Nebraska 94.0 95.9 1.9 Nevada 89.4 94.3 4.9 * New Hampshire 95.0 98.0 3.1 * New Jersey 94.1 96.6 2.5 * New Mexico 85.3 90.4 5.0 * New York 90.8 95.4 4.5 * North Carolina 89.3 92.9 3.6 * North Dakota 95.1 93.7 -1.4 Ohio 92.2 96.4
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0798.pdf
                      • 6.7 * Georgia 88.9 92.2 3.3 Hawaii 94.6 96.1 1.5 Idaho 89.5 93.4 3.9 Illinois 95.0 93.3 -1.7 Indiana 90.3 94.5 4.2 * Iowa 95.4 97.3 1.9 Kansas 94.9 93.2 -1.7 Kentucky 86.9 93.6 6.7 * Louisiana 88.9 91.7 2.7 Maine 90.7 97.7 7.0 * Maryland 96.3 96.9 0.6 Massachusetts 94.3 94.0 -0.3 Michigan 93.8 95.3 1.5 Minnesota 96.4 97.7 1.3 Mississippi 82.4 89.3 6.9 * Missouri 92.1 93.6 1.5 Montana 92.8 93.9 1.1 Nebraska 94.0 96.7 2.7 Nevada 89.4 90.7 1.3 New Hampshire 95.0 95.6 0.6 New Jersey 94.1 93.7 -0.4 New Mexico 85.3 89.8 4.5 New York 90.8 94.7 3.8 * North Carolina 89.3 92.8 3.5 North Dakota 95.1 96.5 1.4 Ohio 92.2 95.4 3.2 * Oklahoma 91.5 91.5
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs0799.pdf
                      • Nevada 89.4 94.9 5.5 * New Hampshire 95.0 97.9 3.0 New Jersey 94.1 92.4 -1.7 New Mexico 85.3 90.9 5.6 New York 90.8 95.4 4.6 * North Carolina 89.3 94.3 5.0 * North Dakota 95.1 98.9 3.8 Ohio 92.2 94.8 2.6 * Oklahoma 91.5 91.3 -0.2 Oregon 91.2 95.8 4.6 * Pennsylvania 95.1 96.9 1.8 * Rhode Island 93.3 94.6 1.3 South Carolina 81.8 91.1 9.3 * South Dakota 92.7 94.5 1.8 Tennessee 87.6 94.9 7.3 * Texas 89.0 93.5 4.5 * Utah 90.3 94.6 4.3 Vermont 92.7 94.5 1.8 Virginia 93.1 93.0 -0.1 Washington 92.5 96.8 4.4 * West Virginia 88.1 92.7 4.6 * Wisconsin 94.8 95.7 0.9 Wyoming 89.7 95.0 5.3 * Total United States 91.4 94.4 3.0 *
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1100.pdf
                      • -1.7 Florida 88.7 92.1 3.4 * Georgia 86.2 91.1 4.9 * Hawaii 93.5 94.7 1.2 Idaho 90.7 93.9 3.2 * Illinois 94.2 91.5 -2.6 # Indiana 91.6 94.5 2.9 * Iowa 96.2 96.2 0.0 Kansas 94.3 94.8 0.5 Kentucky 88.1 93.3 5.2 * Louisiana 89.7 92.6 2.9 * Maine 93.4 97.9 4.4 * Maryland 95.7 95.0 -0.7 Massachusetts 95.9 94.6 -1.3 # Michigan 92.8 95.0 2.1 * Minnesota 95.8 97.4 1.6 * Mississippi 82.4 89.2 6.8 * Missouri 91.5 95.8 4.3 * Montana 91.0 94.6 3.6 * Nebraska 95.7 97.3 1.7 * Nevada 90.4 94.0 3.6 * New Hampshire 94.3 97.7 3.3 * New Jersey 94.8 94.6 -0.2 New Mexico 82.0 91.2 9.2 * New York 91.8 95.1 3.3 * North
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1103.pdf
                      • N83M84J84N84M85J85N85M86J86N86M87J87N87M88J88N88M89J89N89M90J90N90M91J91N91M92J92N92M93J93N93M94J94N94M95J95N95M96J96N96M97J97N97M98J98N98M99J99N99M00J00N00M01J01N01M02J02N02M03J03N03 In Housing Unit Available Telephone Penetration Households 7 Table 2 Telephone Penetration by State (Annual Average Percentage of Households with Telephone Service) State 1984 2003 Change Alabama 88.4% 91.7% 3.3% * Alaska 86.5 96.8 10.3 * Arizona 86.9 95.1 8.2 * Arkansas 86.6 91.0 4.5 * California 92.5 97.1 4.6 * Colorado 93.2 96.8 3.6 * Connecticut 95.5 96.8 1.3 Delaware 94.3 96.6 2.3 * District of Columbia 94.9 95.3 0.4 Florida 88.7 94.6 5.9 * Georgia 86.2 93.7 7.6 * Hawaii 93.5 97.3 3.8 * Idaho 90.7 94.5 3.8 * Illinois 94.2 91.7 -2.5 # Indiana 91.6 93.5 1.9 * Iowa 96.2 96.8 0.6 Kansas 94.3 95.9 1.5 Kentucky 88.1 94.6 6.4 * Louisiana 89.7 93.2 3.5 * Maine
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1104.pdf
                      • 95.5 95.5 0.0 Delaware 94.3 96.0 1.8 * District of Columbia 94.9 91.9 -3.0 # Florida 88.7 93.4 4.7 * Georgia 86.2 91.2 5.0 * Hawaii 93.5 95.4 1.8 * Idaho 90.7 94.8 4.1 * Illinois 94.2 90.1 -4.1 # Indiana 91.6 91.8 0.3 Iowa 96.2 95.4 -0.8 Kansas 94.3 94.8 0.4 Kentucky 88.1 91.4 3.3 * Louisiana 89.7 90.9 1.3 Maine 93.4 96.6 3.2 * Maryland 95.7 93.4 -2.3 # Massachusetts 95.9 96.4 0.5 Michigan 92.8 93.7 0.9 Minnesota 95.8 97.1 1.3 Mississippi 82.4 89.6 7.2 * Missouri 91.5 93.7 2.2 * Montana 91.0 93.5 2.5 * Nebraska 95.7 95.7 0.0 Nevada 90.4 92.2 1.8 New Hampshire 94.3 96.4 2.1 * New Jersey 94.8 95.1 0.3 New Mexico 82.0 91.4
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1196.pdf
                      • 1984 1996 Change Alabama 88.4% 92.2% 3.7% * Alaska 86.5 94.4 7.9 * Arizona 86.9 93.1 6.2 * Arkansas 86.6 86.9 0.3 California 92.5 95.0 2.6 * Colorado 93.2 95.5 2.2 * Connecticut 95.5 97.5 2.0 * Delaware 94.3 96.1 1.8 District of Columbia 94.9 93.0 -1.9 Florida 88.7 93.1 4.4 * Georgia 86.2 89.7 3.5 * Hawaii 93.5 94.8 1.3 Idaho 90.7 92.9 2.2 Illinois 94.2 93.0 -1.2 Indiana 91.6 93.7 2.2 * Iowa 96.2 96.6 0.4 Kansas 94.3 93.9 -0.4 Kentucky 88.1 92.3 4.2 * Louisiana 89.7 91.1 1.4 Maine 93.4 96.5 3.1 * Maryland 95.7 96.7 1.0 Massachusetts 95.9 95.7 -0.2 Michigan 92.8 95.0 2.1 * Minnesota 95.8 97.1 1.3 Mississippi 82.4 87.5 5.2 * Missouri 91.5 95.3
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1197.pdf
                      • Telephone N83M84J84N84M85J85N85M86J86N86M87J87N87M88J88N88M89J89N89M90J90N90M91J91N91M92J92N92M93J93N93M94J94N94M95J95N95M96J96N96M97J97N97 In Housing Unit Available Telephone Penetration Households 6 Table 2 Telephone Penetration by State (Annual Average Percentage of Households with Telephone Service) State 1984 1997 Change Alabama 88.4% 92.3% 3.9% * Alaska 86.5 94.5 8.0 * Arizona 86.9 91.6 4.7 * Arkansas 86.6 89.8 3.2 California 92.5 94.3 1.8 * Colorado 93.2 95.9 2.6 * Connecticut 95.5 94.2 -1.3 Delaware 94.3 95.7 1.5 District of Columbia 94.9 90.8 -4.1 ** Florida 88.7 92.8 4.1 * Georgia 86.2 92.0 5.8 * Hawaii 93.5 94.5 0.9 Idaho 90.7 94.0 3.3 * Illinois 94.2 92.2 -2.0 ** Indiana 91.6 93.8 2.2 * Iowa 96.2 96.7 0.5 Kansas 94.3 94.0 -0.4 Kentucky 88.1 93.2 5.0 * Louisiana 89.7 91.0 1.4 Maine 93.4 96.1
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/subs1199.pdf
                      • 3.9 * Georgia 86.2 92.1 5.9 * Hawaii 93.5 96.3 2.8 * Idaho 90.7 93.8 3.1 * Illinois 94.2 91.8 -2.4 ** Indiana 91.6 93.8 2.3 * Iowa 96.2 95.8 -0.4 Kansas 94.3 93.8 -0.5 Kentucky 88.1 92.8 4.6 * Louisiana 89.7 91.5 1.9 Maine 93.4 97.2 3.8 * Maryland 95.7 95.3 -0.4 Massachusetts 95.9 95.4 -0.5 Michigan 92.8 94.2 1.3 Minnesota 95.8 96.9 1.1 Mississippi 82.4 88.0 5.6 * Missouri 91.5 95.6 4.1 * Montana 91.0 95.3 4.3 * Nebraska 95.7 95.9 0.2 Nevada 90.4 93.1 2.8 New Hampshire 94.3 97.0 2.7 * New Jersey 94.8 93.9 -0.8 New Mexico 82.0 89.8 7.8 * New York 91.8 95.3 3.5 * North Carolina 88.3 93.9 5.6 * North Dakota 94.6 97.3
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/telrev-98.pdf
                      • arrangement 23b Provided under state or federal access tariff 7.6 0.1 7.7 0.1 0.1 0.2 58.0 49.2 107.2 8,495.1 9,441.117,936.2 Total per-minute access charges 25.9 0.1 26.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 128.1 49.2 177.3 9,007.9 9,441.118,449.0 24Local private line & special access 2.1 * 2.1 10.9 38.4 49.3 1,157.7 4,697.0 5,854.8 25Pay telephone compensation from toll carriers 0.6 0.6 1.2 1.7 1.3 3.0 204.2 221.7 425.9 26Other local telecommunications service revenues 3.9 3.9 4.2 10.9 15.2 351.6 81.2 432.8 27Universal service support receipts 5.9 1.2 7.1 385.1 1,020.9 1,406.1 Total fixed local service provided for resale 33.9 1.2 35.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 167.5 101.2 268.7 12,404.216,802.229,206.5 Mobile service: 28Wireless telephony, paging & messaging, and other mobile 2,177.7 85.8 2,263.5 482.7 81.7 564.4
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/telrev01.pdf
                      • are exempt from contributing to universal service support mechanisms. 38 Table 18 Contribution Base Information by Type of Service Provider (Dollar Amounts in Millions) FCC Form 499-Q Type of Provider Q3 2002 Q4 2002 Billed Collected Billed Collected1 Regional Bell Operating Companies $3,513 $3,461 $3,408 $3,344 1.9% $3,365 $3,300 1.9% Other Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers (ILECs) 405 410 421 415 1.3 424 418 1.4 Total ILECs 3,918 3,871 3,829 3,759 1.8 3,788 3,718 1.9 Competitive Access Providers (CAPs) and Competitive Local Exchange Carriers (CLECs) 919 1,006 1,053 1,020 3.2 1,096 1,058 3.4 Local Resellers 52 57 59 56 4.1 61 58 4.5 Private Service Providers * 5 5 5 2.0 5 5 2.0 Shared-Tenant Service Providers 3 3 3 2 7.2
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/telrev02.pdf
                      • Q1 Service Provider Category 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Projected Regional Bell Operating Companies (RBOCs) 11.7% 14.4% 14.3% 16.2% 18.3% 19.9% 19.3% 19.8% Including CLEC Affiliates. Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers (ILECs) 2.6 1.4 1.5 1.7 2.1 2.8 3.6 3.9 Other Than RBOCs Competitive Local Exchange Carriers (CLECs) Local Resellers and Other Local Carriers Other Than RBOCs 0.8 1.3 2.6 2.2 2.7 3.3 3.2 3.3 Total: Fixed Local Service Providers 15.1 17.1 18.5 20.1 23.1 26.0 26.2 27.0 Payphone Providers 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Wireless Service Providers 3.3 5.1 6.6 9.2 12.0 17.2 24.5 26.8 RBOC Toll Service Providers 1.7 1.7 2.0 2.3 3.0 3.4 7.2 6.3 Other Toll Service Providers 79.9 76.0 72.9 68.3
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/telrev03.pdf
                      • Shown in Millions) Data from FCC Form 499-A Cellular, PCS and SMR Wireless Other Wireless Telephony Line Intrastate InterstateInternational Total Intrastate InterstateInternational Total Fixed local service 303Monthly service, local calling, connection charges, vertical features, and other local exchange service including subscriber line and PICC charges to IXCs a Provided as unbundled network elements $1 $1 b Provided under other arrangements 1.3 0.5 * 1.8 Total Line 303 2 1 * 3 304Per-minute charges for originating or terminating calls a Provided under state or federal access tariff 1 1 * 2 b Provided as unbundled network elements or other contract arrangement 40 5 * 45 1 * 1 Total Line 304 40 6 * 46 1 * 1 305Local private line &
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend100.pdf
                      • Street, S.W., Courtyard Level. Copies may be purchased by calling International Transcription Service, Inc. at (202) 857-3800. The report can also be downloaded [file names: TREND100.ZIP, TREND100.PDF] from the FCC-State Link internet site at http://www.fcc.gov/ccb/stats on the World Wide Web. i TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................1-1 ACCESS CHARGES.................................................................................................................1-1 TABLE 1.1 INTERSTATE PER-LINE ACCESS CHARGES..............................................................1-3 TABLE 1.2 INTERSTATE PER-MINUTE ACCESS CHARGES........................................................1-4 TABLE 1.3 INTERSTATE PER-LINE ACCESS CHARGES BY CARRIER..........................................1-5 TABLE 1.4 INTERSTATE PER-MINUTE ACCESS CHARGES BY CARRIER....................................1-6 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE...................................................................................2-1 TABLE 2.1 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SUBSCRIBERS....................................................................2-3 TABLE 2.2 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE: INDUSTRY SURVEY RESULTS...........................2-4 COMPLAINTS...........................................................................................................................3-1 TABLE 3.1 WRITTEN COMPLAINTS PROCESSED.......................................................................3-3 TABLE 3.2 COMPLAINT INDICES FOR IXCS SERVED 20 OR MORE COMPLAINTS......................3-4 TABLE 3.3 COMPLAINT INDICES FOR LECS SERVED 20 OR MORE COMPLAINTS.....................3-6 TABLE 3.4
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend199.pdf
                      • Transcription Services, Inc. (ITS) at (202) 857-3800. The report can be downloaded [file names TREND199.ZIP, TREND199.PDF] from the FCC-State Link internet site at http://www.fcc.gov/ccb/stats on the World Wide Web. TRENDS IN TELEPHONE SERVICE TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.................................................1 - 1 ACCESS CHARGES...............................................1 - 1 Table 1.1 Interstate Per-Line Access Charges........................1 - 3 Table 1.2 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges......................1 - 4 Table 1.3 Interstate Per-Line Access Charges by Carrier................1 - 5 Table 1.4 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges by Carrier..............1 - 6 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE...................................2 - 1 Table 2.1 Cellular Telephone Subscribers..........................2 - 3 Table 2.2 Cellular Telephone Service: Survey Results.................2 - 4 COMPLAINTS...................................................3 - 1 Table 3.1 Written Complaints Processed January 1, 1998 Through June 30, 1998............................................3 - 3 Table 3.2 Companies Served
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
                      • Information Center at 445 12th Street, S.W., Courtyard Level. Copies may be purchased by calling International Transcription Service, Inc. at (202) 857-3800. The report can also be downloaded [file names: TREND200.ZIP, TREND200.PDF] from the FCC-State Link Internet site at . i Table of Contents Introduction..................................................................................................1-1 Access Charges............................................................................................1-3 Table 1.1 Interstate Per-Line Access Charges..........................................................................1-5 Table 1.2 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges......................................................................1-6 Table 1.3 Interstate Per-Line Access Charges by Carrier..........................................................1-7 Table 1.4 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges by Carrier......................................................1-8 Advanced Telecommunications....................................................................2-1 Table 2.1 High-Speed Lines.....................................................................................................2-3 Table 2.2 Advanced Services Lines..........................................................................................2-3 Table 2.3 Residential and Small Business High-Speed Lines......................................................2-3 Table 2.4 High-Speed Lines by Technology..............................................................................2-4 Consumer Expenditures...............................................................................3-1 Table 3.1 Household Expenditures for Telephone Service.........................................................3-3 Chart 3.1 Monthly Telephone Service Expenditures..................................................................3-3 Table 3.2 Average Monthly Household Telecommunications
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend298.pdf
                      • Telephone #: To discuss the information in this report, contact: Industry Analysis Division at 202-418-0940 Fax this response to or Mail this response to 202-418-0520 FCC/IAD Mail Stop 1600 F Washington, DC 20554 TRENDS IN TELEPHONE SERVICE TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION......................................................... 1 ACCESS CHARGES....................................................... 1 Table 1.1 Interstate Per-Line Access Charges............................... 3 Table 1.2 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges............................. 4 Table 1.3 Interstate Per-Line Access Charges by Carrier...................... 5 Table 1.4 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges by Carrier.................... 6 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE.......................................... 7 Table 2.1 Cellular Telephone Subscribers.................................. 8 Table 2.2 Cellular Telephone Service: Survey Results........................ 9 COMPLAINTS........................................................... 10 Table 3.1 Carriers Served with More Than 50 Complaints in 1997.............. 12 Table 3.2 Local Exchange Carriers Served with More Than 50 Complaints in
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend299.pdf
                      • Transcription Services, Inc. (ITS) at (202) 857-3800. The report can be downloaded [file names TREND299.ZIP, TREND299.PDF] from the FCC-State Link internet site at http://www.fcc.gov/ccb/stats on the World Wide Web. TRENDS IN TELEPHONE SERVICE TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.................................................1 - 1 ACCESS CHARGES...............................................1 - 1 Table 1.1 Interstate Per-Line Access Charges........................1 - 3 Table 1.2 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges......................1 - 4 Table 1.3 Interstate Per-Line Access Charges by Carrier................1 - 5 Table 1.4 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges by Carrier..............1 - 6 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICE...................................2 - 1 Table 2.1 Cellular Telephone Subscribers..........................2 - 3 Table 2.2 Cellular Telephone Service: Survey Results.................2 - 4 COMPLAINTS...................................................3 - 1 Table 3.1 Written Complaints Processed January 1, 1998 Through June 30, 1998............................................3 - 3 Table 3.2 Companies Served
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
                      • Name: Telephone #: To discuss the information in this report contact: call 202-418-0940 or for users of TTY equipment, call (202) 418-0484 Fax this response to Or Mail this response to 202-418-0520 FCC/IATD Mail Stop 1600 F Washington, DC 20554 i Table of Contents Introduction..........................................................................................................1-1 Access Charges.....................................................................................................1-3 Table 1.1 Interstate Per-Line Access Charges.......................................................................1-5 Table 1.2 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges...................................................................1-6 Table 1.3 Interstate Per-Line Access Charges by Carrier......................................................1-7 Table 1.4 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges by Carrier.................................................1-8 Advanced Telecommunications..........................................................................2-1 Table 2.1 High-Speed Lines..................................................................................................2-3 Table 2.2 Advanced Services Lines.......................................................................................2-3 Table 2.3 Residential and Small Business High-Speed Lines...............................................2-4 Table 2.4 Residential and Small Business Advanced Services Lines...................................2-4 Table 2.5 High-Speed Lines by Technology.........................................................................2-5 Consumer Expenditures......................................................................................3-1 Table 3.1 Household Expenditures for Telephone Service...................................................3-3 Chart 3.1 Monthly
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
                      • by calling Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington DC 20554 at (202) 863-2893, facimile (202) 863-2898, or via e-mail qualexint@ aol.com. The report can also be downloaded from the FCC-State Link Internet site at www.fcc.gov/wcb/stats. i Table of Contents Introduction..........................................................................................................1-1 Access Charges.....................................................................................................1-3 Table 1.1 Interstate Per-Line Access Charges.......................................................................1-5 Table 1.2 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges...................................................................1-6 Table 1.3 Interstate Per-Line Access Charges by Carrier......................................................1-7 Table 1.4 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges by Carrier.................................................1-8 Advanced Telecommunications..........................................................................2-1 Table 2.1 High-Speed Lines..................................................................................................2-3 Chart 2.1 High-Speed Lines...................................................................................................2-3 Chart 2.2 High-Speed Lines by Technology.........................................................................2-3 Table 2.2 Advanced Services Lines.......................................................................................2-4 Chart 2.3 Advanced Services Lines.......................................................................................2-4 Chart 2.4 Advanced Services Lines by Technology..............................................................2-4 Table 2.3 Residential and Small Business High-Speed Lines...............................................2-5 Chart 2.5 Residential and Small
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
                      • by calling Best Copy and Printing, Inc., Portals II, 445 12th Street S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington DC 20554 at 800-378-3160, facimile 202-488-5563, or via e-mail fcc@bcpiweb.com. The report can also be downloaded from the FCC-State Link Internet site at: www.fcc.gov/wcb/trends.html. i Table of Contents Introduction..........................................................................................................1-1 Access Charges.....................................................................................................1-1 Table 1.1 Interstate Per-Line Access Charges.......................................................................1-3 Table 1.2 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges...................................................................1-4 Table 1.3 Interstate Per-Line Access Charges by Carrier......................................................1-5 Table 1.4 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges by Carrier.................................................1-6 Advanced Telecommunications..........................................................................2-1 Table 2.1 High-Speed Lines..................................................................................................2-3 Chart 2.1 Total High-Speed Lines.........................................................................................2-3 Chart 2.2 High-Speed Lines by Technology.........................................................................2-3 Table 2.2 Advanced Services Lines.......................................................................................2-4 Chart 2.3 Advanced Services Lines.......................................................................................2-4 Chart 2.4 Advanced Services Lines by Technology..............................................................2-4 Table 2.3 Residential and Small Business High-Speed Lines...............................................2-5 Chart 2.5 Residential and
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
                      • Information Center at 445 12th Street, S.W., Courtyard Level. Copies may be purchased by calling International Transcription Service, Inc. at (202) 857-3800. The report can also be downloaded [file names: TREND101.ZIP, TREND101.PDF] from the FCC-State Link Internet site at . i Table of Contents Introduction..................................................................................................1-1 Access Charges............................................................................................1-3 Table 1.1 Interstate Per-Line Access Charges..........................................................................1-5 Table 1.2 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges......................................................................1-6 Table 1.3 Interstate Per-Line Access Charges by Carrier..........................................................1-7 Table 1.4 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges by Carrier......................................................1-8 Advanced Telecommunications....................................................................2-1 Table 2.1 High-Speed Lines.....................................................................................................2-3 Table 2.2 Advanced Services Lines..........................................................................................2-3 Table 2.3 Residential and Small Business High-Speed Lines......................................................2-3 Table 2.4 High-Speed Lines by Technology..............................................................................2-4 Consumer Expenditures...............................................................................3-1 Table 3.1 Household Expenditures for Telephone Service.........................................................3-3 Chart 3.1 Monthly Telephone Service Expenditures..................................................................3-3 Table 3.2 Average Monthly Household Telecommunications
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
                      • by calling Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington DC 20554 at (202) 863-2893, facimile (202) 863-2898, or via e-mail qualexint@ aol.com. The report can also be downloaded from the FCC-State Link Internet site at www.fcc.gov/wcb/stats. i Table of Contents Introduction..........................................................................................................1-1 Access Charges.....................................................................................................1-3 Table 1.1 Interstate Per-Line Access Charges.......................................................................1-5 Table 1.2 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges...................................................................1-6 Table 1.3 Interstate Per-Line Access Charges by Carrier......................................................1-7 Table 1.4 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges by Carrier.................................................1-8 Advanced Telecommunications..........................................................................2-1 Table 2.1 High-Speed Lines..................................................................................................2-3 Table 2.2 Advanced Services Lines.......................................................................................2-3 Table 2.3 Residential and Small Business High-Speed Lines...............................................2-4 Table 2.4 Residential and Small Business Advanced Services Lines...................................2-4 Table 2.5 High-Speed Lines by Technology as of December 31, 2002................................2-5 Table 2.6 High-Speed Lines by State....................................................................................2-6 Consumer
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trsrv-95.pdf
                      • Interstate Intrastate + Interstate Interstate as % of Total RevenueAs Percent of RevenueAs Percent of RevenueAs Percent of Revenue Total Intrastate Total Interstate Total Carrier in Revenue Revenue Revenue Category Local Exchange Service $45,160.2 40.0% $27.5 0.0% $45,187.7 22.7% 0.1% Local Private Line Service $1,221.5 1.1 $4.5 0.0 $1,225.9 0.6 0.4 Cellular, PCS, Paging & Other Mobile $17,616.8 15.6 $1,081.5 1.3 $18,698.2 9.4 5.8 Alternative Access and Other $9,262.8 8.2 $1,164.9 1.4 $10,427.8 5.2 11.2 Total Local Revenues $73,261.3 64.9 $2,278.3 2.6 $75,539.6 38.0 3.0 Interstate Access $4.5 0.0 $24,820.5 28.8 $24,825.0 12.5 100.0 Intrastate Access $9,062.8 8.0 $7.7 0.0 $9,070.4 4.6 0.1 Total Access Revenues $9,067.2 8.0 $24,828.2 28.8 $33,895.4 17.0 73.2 Operator Service, Pay Telephone & Card $4,290.1 3.8
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trsrv-96.pdf
                      • of Revenue As Percent of Revenue As Percent of Revenue Total Intrastate Total Interstate Total Carrier in Revenue Revenue Revenue Category Local Exchange Service $48,666.3 38.1% $50.6 0.1% $48,717.0 21.9% 0.1% Local Private Line Service $1,504.1 1.2 $111.5 0.1 $1,615.6 0.7 6.9 Cellular, PCS, Paging & Other Mobile $24,673.7 19.3 $1,375.1 1.5 $26,048.8 11.7 5.3 Other Local $9,294.3 7.3 $1,248.8 1.3 $10,543.1 4.7 11.8 Total Local Revenues $84,138.4 65.8 $2,786.0 3.0 $86,924.4 39.1 3.2 Interstate Access $76.5 0.1 $26,110.9 27.7 $26,187.4 11.8 99.7 Intrastate Access $9,453.1 7.4 $0.0 0.0 $9,453.1 4.3 0.0 Total Access Revenues $9,529.6 7.5 $26,110.9 27.7 $35,640.5 16.0 73.3 Operator Service, Pay Telephone & Card $4,521.9 3.5 $6,453.5 6.8 $10,975.4 4.9 58.8 Non-Operator Switched Toll Service $25,150.7 19.7
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trsrv-97.pdf
                      • 16.3 0.8 0.8 110.3 110.3 contract arrangement 23 b Provided under state or federal access tariff 8,275.1 13,004.3 21,279.4 11.2 1.8 13.0 17.8 2.2 20.0 8,304.2 13,008.2 21,312.4 24 Local private line & special access 933.1 3,595.7 4,528.9 * 0.2 0.2 10.5 2.5 13.0 943.6 3,598.4 4,542.1 25 Pay telephone compensation from toll carriers 246.5 51.6 298.1 1.6 1.6 1.2 1.3 2.5 249.3 52.9 302.2 26 Other local telecommunications service revenues 216.7 30.0 246.7 * * * 15.1 1.1 16.2 231.8 31.1 262.9 27 Universal service support revenue 354.3 788.9 1,143.2 0.6 0.6 354.3 789.5 1,143.9 Total fixed local service provided for resale 10,528.5 17,487.8 28,016.4 30.7 2.7 33.4 62.0 10.5 72.4 10,621.2 17,501.0 28,122.2 Mobile service (including wireless telephony, paging
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/utilizationdec2000.pdf
                      • 1.9 251 2.1 5,150 42.4 12,139 Delaware 1,418 36.4 91 2.3 69 1.8 53 1.4 38 1.0 2,224 57.1 3,893 District of Columbia 2,693 54.6 57 1.2 594 12.0 114 2.3 26 0.5 1,450 29.4 4,933 Florida 26,635 46.9 1,072 1.9 2,588 4.6 1,737 3.1 1,044 1.8 23,692 41.7 56,768 Georgia 12,880 37.9 1,011 3.0 1,988 5.8 797 2.3 428 1.3 16,890 49.7 33,994 Hawaii 2,045 50.0 38 0.9 5 0.1 107 2.6 59 1.4 1,836 44.9 4,090 Idaho 1,733 32.7 261 4.9 39 0.7 106 2.0 83 1.6 3,074 58.0 5,297 Illinois 20,073 38.7 2,468 4.8 3,019 5.8 1,245 2.4 599 1.2 24,498 47.2 51,902 Indiana 7,713 35.5 417 1.9 974 4.5 466 2.1 308 1.4 11,869 54.6 21,747 Iowa
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/utilizationdec2001.pdf
                      • % 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s Alabama 6,340 37.5 1,138 6.7 173 1.0 499 3.0 334 2.0 8,403 49.8 16,887 Alaska 1,027 21.7 12 0.3 51 1.1 65 1.4 24 0.5 3,542 75.0 4,722 Arizona 9,767 52.1 295 1.6 362 1.9 747 4.0 184 1.0 7,381 39.4 18,737 Arkansas 3,349 28.8 701 6.0 153 1.3 207 1.8 91 0.8 7,139 61.3 11,639 California 58,005 39.7 7,640 5.2 1,333 0.9 4,073 2.8 2,115 1.4 73,062 50.0 146,228 Colorado 9,472 50.6 76 0.4 295 1.6 832 4.4 273 1.5 7,773 41.5 18,722 Connecticut 5,549 38.7 884 6.2 122 0.9 318 2.2 177 1.2 7,278 50.8 14,328 Delaware 1,701 38.2 33 0.7 74 1.7 92 2.1 56 1.3
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/utilizationdec2002.pdf
                      • not add due to rounding. Table 4 Telephone Number Utilization by State as of December 31, 2002 Assigned Intermediate Reserved Aging Administrative Available1 Total State/jurisdiction 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s Alabama 6,209 34.1 1,326 7.3 139 0.8 426 2.3 258 1.4 9,871 54.1 18,229 Alaska 1,115 23.0 33 0.7 26 0.5 64 1.3 40 0.8 3,566 73.6 4,845 Arizona 9,825 51.7 346 1.8 300 1.6 625 3.3 137 0.7 7,773 40.9 19,006 Arkansas 3,324 25.8 811 6.3 185 1.4 212 1.6 241 1.9 8,099 62.9 12,872 California 59,018 39.5 8,002 5.4 1,104 0.7 3,515 2.4 2,056 1.4 75,767 50.7 149,462 Colorado 9,622 50.0 68 0.4 232 1.2 707 3.7 226 1.2 8,385 43.6
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/utilizationdec2003.pdf
                      • add due to rounding. 12 Table 4 Telephone Number Utilization by State as of December 31, 2003 Assigned Intermediate Reserved Aging Administrative Available1 Total State/jurisdiction 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s Alabama 7,093 36.1 638 3.3 156 0.8 587 3.0 221 1.1 10,928 55.7 19,623 Alaska 1,075 23.6 5 0.1 54 1.2 61 1.3 20 0.4 3,344 73.4 4,559 Arizona 9,483 49.6 871 4.6 208 1.1 588 3.1 165 0.9 7,818 40.9 19,133 Arkansas 3,606 25.2 898 6.3 103 0.7 237 1.7 453 3.2 9,015 63.0 14,311 California 62,551 41.8 8,485 5.7 598 0.4 3,753 2.5 2,088 1.4 71,991 48.2 149,467 Colorado 9,635 50.1 210 1.1 141 0.7 577 3.0 242 1.3 8,435 43.8
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/utilizationjun2001.pdf
                      • 1.0 514 3.0 332 1.9 8,866 51.2 17,314 Alaska 965 18.7 21 0.4 73 1.4 74 1.4 28 0.5 3,992 77.5 5,153 Arizona 9,539 52.0 431 2.4 307 1.7 629 3.4 251 1.4 7,183 39.2 18,340 Arkansas 3,015 26.4 772 6.8 129 1.1 208 1.8 84 0.7 7,218 63.2 11,426 California 57,879 40.7 8,391 5.9 1,568 1.1 4,022 2.8 1,916 1.3 68,500 48.1 142,276 Colorado 9,189 52.8 236 1.4 264 1.5 650 3.7 300 1.7 6,771 38.9 17,411 Connecticut 5,456 41.6 966 7.4 266 2.0 293 2.2 220 1.7 5,905 45.1 13,104 Delaware 1,725 38.3 67 1.5 17 0.4 81 1.8 48 1.1 2,563 57.0 4,500 District of Columbia 2,777 55.4 132 2.6 45 0.9 312 6.2 26 0.5 1,725 34.4
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/utilizationjun2003.pdf
                      • of Columbia 3,252 63.4 14 0.3 167 3.3 127 2.5 26 0.5 1,543 30.1 5,130 Florida 28,921 45.2 3,401 5.3 469 0.7 2,186 3.4 985 1.5 28,023 43.8 63,984 Georgia 14,398 39.5 3,063 8.4 271 0.7 1,035 2.8 390 1.1 17,323 47.5 36,480 Guam Not shown to protect carrier confidentiality Hawaii 2,490 55.4 77 1.7 12 0.3 114 2.5 58 1.3 1,740 38.7 4,491 Idaho 2,216 38.5 14 0.2 55 1.0 129 2.2 80 1.4 3,259 56.7 5,752 Illinois 22,264 38.9 1,211 2.1 790 1.4 1,203 2.1 642 1.1 31,088 54.4 57,198 Indiana 9,047 35.3 391 1.5 358 1.4 482 1.9 266 1.0 15,095 58.9 25,639 Iowa 4,490 26.9 129 0.8 219 1.3 250 1.5 135 0.8 11,487 68.7 16,711 Kansas
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/utilizationjun2004.pdf
                      • yet been assigned to carriers. 2 Unduplicated total. Note: Figures may not add due to rounding. 13 Table 4 Telephone Number Utilization by State as of June 30, 2004 Assigned Intermediate Reserved Aging Administrative Available1 Total State/jurisdiction 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s % 000s Alabama 7,515 38.0 415 2.1 216 1.1 644 3.3 259 1.3 10,708 54.2 19,756 Alaska 1,085 24.2 6 0.1 15 0.3 58 1.3 18 0.4 3,303 73.6 4,486 Arizona 10,274 53.5 391 2.0 201 1.0 589 3.1 174 0.9 7,579 39.5 19,209 Arkansas 3,801 27.4 769 5.5 89 0.6 283 2.0 446 3.2 8,470 61.1 13,858 California 64,497 43.7 7,563 5.1 758 0.5 3,418 2.3 2,053 1.4 69,262 46.9 147,551 Colorado
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/4361-96.pdf
                      • Percent share by carrier Receipts Percent share by carrier Receipts Percent share by carrier Total Percent share by carrier revenues 1 2 3 4 Other from PTT 1 2 3 4 Other from PTT 1 2 3 4 Other Minutes 1 2 3 4 Other Andorra $312,27236.018.938.7 0.0 6.3 $30,08598.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 $0 614,06938.816.930.8 0.013.4 Austria $41,084,18166.218.313.9 0.2 1.3 $6,702,12940.433.326.3 0.0 0.1 $640,568100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 78,468,44845.025.926.2 0.3 2.6 Belgium $84,981,48261.321.112.9 4.1 0.6 $12,973,51748.128.917.2 5.8 0.0 $2,428,36766.925.5 2.3 0.0 5.3 156,690,80745.726.319.8 6.7 1.5 Cyprus $8,653,92663.423.110.3 0.0 3.2 $3,220,36954.932.113.0 0.0 0.0 $607,35457.935.3 6.8 0.0 0.0 13,638,36254.328.213.9 0.0 3.6 Denmark $43,009,23157.722.511.1 7.9 0.8 $7,370,74149.925.517.4 7.2 0.0 $986,36135.854.010.2 0.0 0.0 88,916,02842.323.620.611.8 1.8 Finland $22,523,77570.816.9 9.2 2.2 0.9 $4,512,42650.923.622.3 3.1 0.0 $255,67151.020.414.5
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/4361-97.pdf
                      • $20,799,22456.427.9 7.9 3.6 4.2 $4,248,12842.719.515.622.3 0.0 $1,016,01792.7 6.7 0.6 0.0 0.0 47,252,20945.822.413.510.1 8.2 France $322,044,82152.535.0 7.8 3.6 1.1 $29,592,33041.027.915.615.2 0.3 $7,141,72866.718.311.0 0.0 4.0 719,308,75541.927.913.913.7 2.5 Germany $503,613,45264.222.2 7.8 3.0 2.8 $34,185,89545.330.9 9.9 9.9 4.0 $8,426,11957.336.5 0.7 0.0 5.5 1,320,125,71643.128.2 9.210.2 9.2 Gibraltar $503,82791.8 0.1 1.9 1.6 4.7 $114,996100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $31,573100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 866,25391.0 0.1 1.0 1.3 6.7 Greece $94,234,04061.729.6 5.5 2.4 0.7 $16,516,92371.319.9 8.8 0.0 0.0 $7,972,62188.911.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 132,482,55967.021.7 7.3 2.8 1.2 Greenland $2,951,522 4.4 2.0 2.2 0.091.4 $0 $0 9,121,560 0.0 0.8 1.4 0.097.8 Iceland $8,204,06565.823.7 8.7 0.1 1.7 $3,159,19057.729.612.6 0.0 0.1 $238,33279.719.7 0.6 0.0 0.0 17,481,25352.232.911.9 0.1 3.0 Ireland $96,555,32765.326.7 7.5 0.2 0.4 $9,779,38965.921.812.1 0.0 0.2 $521,84369.330.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 182,992,64963.622.512.5 0.3
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/4361-98.pdf
                      • 0.040.4 0.0 0.5 $755,13899.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 4,922,55144.6 2.731.011.710.0 Uganda $7,576,23058.8 1.125.6 1.612.9 $320,45958.2 0.028.8 0.013.0 $1,167,59884.6 0.015.0 0.0 0.4 11,532,11245.3 1.520.6 1.231.4 Western Sahara $0 $0 $1100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 Zaire $15,579,76679.0 0.714.6 1.0 4.7 $56,64925.4 0.066.0 1.9 6.7 $5,900,246100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 23,938,72070.5 0.921.9 1.4 5.3 Zambia $4,988,67268.8 0.616.8 8.7 5.1 $350,16745.2 0.053.5 0.0 1.3 $398,68950.3 0.049.7 0.0 0.0 6,816,13458.3 1.025.2 9.0 6.5 Zimbabwe $8,224,79268.1 0.812.2 7.411.5 $1,678,77952.6 0.031.213.6 2.6 $295,29660.1 0.035.5 4.4 0.0 13,924,24348.5 1.320.3 8.421.4 Africa $684,496,30552.8 2.028.1 9.4 7.7 $67,474,30540.3 0.037.511.510.7 $57,012,52883.7 0.015.2 0.1 1.0 983,501,67240.7 2.932.010.114.3 Bahrain $16,971,75571.6 0.313.7 6.7 7.7 $3,865,59151.2 0.032.014.2 2.6 $255,67198.9 0.0 1.1 0.1 0.0 20,434,36659.7 0.521.5 9.0 9.3 Iran $66,047,28260.1 2.622.5 5.7 9.1 $18,847,85070.8 0.021.7 5.3
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/4361-f00.pdf
                      • 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,879,48288.3 0.0 0.5 1.210.0 Greece $132,243,15834.260.9 0.7 3.2 1.0 $5,266,54643.343.1 0.012.9 0.7 $1,562,64139.560.1 0.0 0.4 0.0 252,187,00949.037.1 0.7 8.6 4.6 Greenland $35,85115.044.9 7.931.2 1.0 $838 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $155100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 87,186 4.039.5 5.343.7 7.5 Iceland $7,004,23949.532.4 0.117.6 0.4 $1,202,92046.418.6 0.034.9 0.1 $302,63967.332.6 0.0 0.1 0.0 24,958,89838.322.8 0.037.8 1.1 Ireland $83,126,93656.832.3 0.2 9.4 1.3 $3,211,04645.333.8 0.016.8 4.0 $1,437,07976.022.9 0.0 1.0 0.1 218,960,11748.431.2 0.315.3 4.8 Italy $273,177,71327.662.6 0.4 8.2 1.4 $8,419,06138.832.9 0.012.815.4 $2,418,93280.4 8.7 0.010.9 0.0 626,689,38023.753.1 0.312.110.8 Liechtenstein $25,99224.7 0.0 1.147.626.5 $553 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $1,582100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 345,078 8.0 0.0 0.271.820.0 Luxembourg $6,034,03052.634.8 0.311.8 0.4 $648,92557.820.3 0.021.4 0.5 $1,657,10099.1 0.5 0.0 0.4 0.0 18,901,54050.627.0 0.219.7 2.5 Malta $3,277,74840.857.0 0.6 0.0
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/4361-f01.pdf
                      • traffic. Table A1 shows that carriers reported 33.3 billion minutes of U.S. billed traffic in 2001, for which they billed $10.8 billion. Table A40 shows that 27.5 billion of these minutes and $8.9 billion of this revenue was for calls that originated in the United States or terminated collect or caller toll-free in the United States. Table A41 shows that 1.3 billion of these minutes and $1.2 billion of this revenue was for country-direct and country-beyond type services. Table A42 shows that 4.4 billion of these minutes and $.7 billion of this revenue was for reorigination services billed to foreign carriers. Foreign billed traffic is all traffic billed by a foreign or correspondent carrier and includes most calls that originate at
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/4361-f02.pdf
                      • 0.0 3.097.0 0.0 0.0 3,718,661 0.015.9 1.080.2 2.9 Luxembourg $4,078,07071.8 9.6 1.514.0 3.1 $248,92151.925.7 0.021.2 1.2 $243,066 1.679.418.3 0.7 0.0 28,042,77650.216.8 3.723.2 6.1 Malta $1,457,36561.013.1 0.812.812.5 $156,74976.3 0.0 0.023.7 0.0 $35,25148.4 0.250.9 0.4 0.0 12,273,75420.1 8.2 1.153.217.3 Netherlands $84,134,90956.712.6 1.326.5 2.8 $8,270,94930.3 6.8 0.153.3 9.5 $16,991,03813.4 0.2 0.3 1.584.5 627,313,01534.710.0 2.841.910.6 Norway $21,921,39937.210.7 0.428.223.5 $1,147,89142.232.0 0.025.4 0.4 $72,439 0.0 6.279.912.6 1.3 139,693,80027.414.7 1.126.830.0 Portugal $32,218,96771.2 2.8 2.917.8 5.3 $892,94347.6 7.9 0.044.5 0.0 $346,87146.515.537.7 0.3 0.0 156,426,61151.0 2.0 6.324.616.2 Spain $87,156,58029.419.1 4.021.326.2 $4,290,19029.4 8.2 0.114.248.1 $27,227,803 0.5 3.1 0.5 0.395.6 511,822,71530.720.6 5.520.422.9 Sweden $48,400,31161.014.2 0.321.2 3.3 $6,176,23134.528.8 0.036.7 0.0 $65,27329.110.457.1 1.1 2.2 380,860,20830.419.9 0.844.7 4.1 Switzerland $48,065,94657.016.5 0.521.6 4.4 $2,835,82739.416.8 0.043.5 0.3 $841,56363.3 3.5 7.411.714.1 395,645,84130.411.2 1.253.4 3.8 Turkey $51,736,82639.818.4 0.634.1 7.1
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/4361-f99.pdf
                      • carrier revenues 1 2 3 4 Other from PTT 1 2 3 4 Other from PTT 1 2 3 4 Other Minutes 1 2 3 4 Other Andorra $65,875 4.827.726.4 4.736.4 $924 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $0 195,230 1.217.720.113.347.6 Austria $49,393,43145.838.7 9.3 1.6 4.5 $2,484,80850.927.816.4 0.0 4.9 $1,437,87299.7 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 134,403,60028.633.417.1 7.413.4 Belgium $76,019,97649.734.010.9 0.5 5.0 $4,412,48057.630.510.6 0.0 1.3 $763,19719.975.6 4.4 0.0 0.0 179,985,31933.925.911.1 2.726.4 Cyprus $11,531,61550.427.912.9 0.5 8.2 $1,577,25043.422.910.5 0.023.2 $39,12022.940.037.1 0.0 0.0 22,880,48131.716.624.4 1.625.7 Denmark $32,113,95550.430.211.2 1.0 7.2 $2,217,94534.942.016.4 0.0 6.7 $450,20942.557.1 0.4 0.0 0.0 89,076,52830.332.713.2 7.216.6 Finland $19,457,33354.632.410.1 0.8 2.1 $1,935,50643.535.820.1 0.2 0.4 $3,111,937 2.7 2.0 0.395.0 0.0 49,027,58240.328.119.7 4.9 7.0 France $204,684,69648.230.412.8 1.6 7.1 $16,921,18356.516.422.2 0.0 4.8 $11,573,38568.4 9.9 1.720.0 0.0 803,344,64732.417.218.7 3.528.1 Germany $543,995,47261.723.2
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/crepor03.pdf
                      • 97.4 0.0 33,435,294 57.2 1.8 26.0 11.9 3.1 Malta $3,098,774 46.5 7.0 17.8 17.5 11.2 $93,977 70.3 0.0 29.5 0.0 0.1 $394 0.0 0.0100.0 0.0 0.0 22,608,801 29.0 10.5 27.6 17.8 15.1 Netherlands $111,368,352 66.1 0.8 14.5 16.4 2.2 $9,250,560 33.1 5.0 43.4 11.8 6.7 $15,889,017 0.7 97.7 1.6 0.0 0.0 798,023,705 35.4 3.5 33.2 16.7 11.2 Norway $28,785,730 42.3 1.3 15.9 26.1 14.4 $2,235,416 20.2 1.0 12.3 66.0 0.5 $861,416 0.0100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 206,065,128 21.0 2.2 18.7 41.1 17.0 Portugal $31,812,704 76.4 3.2 13.3 3.9 3.2 $1,612,633 68.0 0.0 26.5 4.9 0.5 $8,824 0.0 19.9 10.9 69.2 0.0 180,759,687 50.8 8.9 24.9 6.1 9.3 Spain $114,772,545 55.0 4.0 11.2 26.4 3.5 $3,613,281 34.3 20.8 30.7 8.3 5.9 $12,437,764 0.8
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/filingmanual.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/filingmanual.pdf
                      • obtaining a waiver from the FCC. Carriers may consolidate pure resale traffic for domestic U.S. points (the Conterminous United States, Alaska, Hawaii, and Puerto Rico). However, carriers may not consolidate pure resale data for an off-shore U.S. point and a domestic U.S. point, or for two off-shore U.S. points, without obtaining a waiver from the FCC. See 47 CFR Section 1.3. Carriers should not include in their report U.S. points that they do not serve. 2. Filing data on a Country-by-Country Basis For each large U.S. point, facilities-based and facilities resale carriers must provide country-by-country data on diskette for each service that they provide. However, region-by-region data may be substituted for miscellaneous services. For small U.S. points, each carrier must report
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd98.pdf
                      • Estimated Facilities-based & Pure Resale All International End-user Facilities Resale Revenue 1/ 2/ Share Share Share Share International MTS AT&T $8,425 59.5% $0 0.0%$8,425 52.9% MCI 3,968 28.0 52 3.0 4,020 25.3 Sprint 1,289 9.1 68 3.9 1,357 8.5 WorldCom 291 2.1 188 10.7 479 3.0 Total 4 largest 13,973 98.7 308 17.6 14,281 89.7 13,097 89.7% Other Carriers 187 1.3 1,446 82.4 1,633 10.3 1,501 10.3 Total all carriers 14,160100.0 1,754100.0 15,914100.0 14,599100.0 1/Carriers do not report 43.61 traffic data separately for service sold to other carriers vs. service sold to end-users. Estimates are made by using two assumptions: that toll resellers purchase 90% of service from the four largest carriers versus 10% from other facilities-based and resale carriers; and,
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd99.pdf
                      • Revenues Estimated Facilities-based & Pure Resale All International End-user Facilities-Resale Revenue 1/ 2/ Share Share Share Share International MTS AT&T $8,425 59.5% $0 0.0%$8,425 52.9% MCI 3,968 28.0 52 3.0 4,020 25.3 Sprint 1,289 9.1 68 3.9 1,357 8.5 WorldCom 291 2.1 188 10.7 479 3.0 Total 4 largest 13,973 98.7 308 17.6 14,281 89.7 13,097 89.7% Other Carriers 187 1.3 1,446 82.4 1,633 10.3 1,501 10.3 Total all carriers 14,160100.0 1,754100.0 15,914100.0 14,599100.0 1/The data in this table were taken from Section 43.61 Traffic Data reports. The figures are world totals for international message telephone service and, unlike data in Table 4, include international traffic between domestic and offshore U.S. points. Carriers do not report 43.61 traffic data separately for
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd00.pdf
                      • Total Messages 1,485 1,723 2,295 2,750 3,165 3,755 4,354 5,496 6,361 6,611 7,972 16.5 Average Minutes per Message U.S. Calls 7.2 7.3 6.6 6.2 5.9 5.8 5.6 5.5 5.3 5.4 5.4 -1.7 Foreign Calls 5.3 5.3 5.2 4.9 4.7 4.5 4.6 4.2 4.4 4.8 4.0 -1.6 All Telephone Calls 7.1 7.2 6.2 5.8 5.6 5.5 5.4 5.1 5.1 5.5 5.1 -1.3 Billed Revenues $6,901 $8,042 $9,219$10,331$11,505$12,431$14,160$14,234$15,250$14,246$14,505 3.8 Settlement Payments $4,735 $5,297 $5,852 $6,008 $6,372 $7,010 $7,569 $8,252 $8,031 $7,022 $6,361 0.2 Retained Billed Revenues $2,166 $2,745 $3,367 $4,324 $5,133 $5,421 $6,591 $5,982 $7,219 $7,225 $8,144 7.6 Settlement Receipts $2,213 $2,426 $2,410 $2,481 $2,477 $2,502 $2,464 $2,451 $2,459 $2,158 $1,576 -5.7 Transiting Traffic Receipts $282 $370 $452 $496 $565 $369 $408 $1,094
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd01.pdf
                      • 199412,430.9 1,122.7 440.9 122.7 12.4 25.3 13,144.314,154.8 80,726 17.5 199514,159.8 1,759.4 514.2 119.3 6.3 47.9 15,023.416,606.8 85,475 19.4 199614,234.1 3,642.7 660.7 118.9 5.0 26.1 15,409.118,687.5 93,361 20.0 199715,250.4 4,113.1 850.9 109.8 3.5 28.3 16,654.220,356.0 $89,193100,793 18.7%20.2 199814,246.4 4,798.3 921.5 50.5 2.7 36.3 15,737.220,055.7 91,607105,055 17.2 19.1 199914,527.6 4,528.0 1,215.9 56.8 1.6 30.8 16,285.520,360.8 93,311108,246 17.5 18.8 200014,172.2 7,366.7 1,501.9 32.7 1.3 250.6 16,751.423,381.4 87,767109,615 19.1 21.3 200110,844.4 5,341.8 1,467.0 10.3 0.3 199.2 13,392.318,200.0 79,302 99,301 16.9 18.3 2002 9,446.4 5,100.7 988.1 5/ 5/ 112.8 12,005.916,596.6 67,222 83,697 17.9 19.8 See notes at the end of the tables. Table 2 International Telephone Service Per-Minute Data 1/ (Revenues, Payouts, Receipts and Minutes Amounts Shown in Millions) U.S. Billed Amounts Foreign Billed Amounts Per-Minute
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/datadefa.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/datadefa.pdf
                      • Area Code N/A 7. D CC_ABBR Common Control Abbreviation N/A $20. E T_ Tier N/A 2. F S_ Subset N/A 2. G PRD USF Data Collection Period 040 4. H F File N/A $2. I CL Calculation Method N/A $2. J ST State Abbreviation N/A $3. K EXCH Number of Exchanges Within the Study Area N/A 5. L USFLOOPS Category 1.3 Loops N/A 11. M SAR_CPL Study Area Cost Per Loop N/A 8.2 N NACPL National Average Cost Per Loop N/A 8.2 O ANNPAY Annual Expense Adjustment N/A 15.2 P MOPAY Monthly Expense Adjustment N/A 15.2 Q USFURR USF Unseparated Revenue Requirement N/A 15.2 R SAR_CPLU Study Area Cost Per Loop Unlimited N/A 8.2 S NACPLU National Average Cost Per Loop
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/datadefc.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/datadefc.pdf
                      • C CC_ID Exchange Carrier Study Area Code N/A 7. D CC_ABBR Common Control Abbreviation N/A $20. E T_ Tier N/A 2. F S_ Subset N/A 2. G PRD USF Data Collection Period 040 4. H F File N/A $2. I CL Calculation Method N/A $2. J ST State Abbreviation N/A $3. K TOTLOOPS Total Loops 060 11. L USFLOOPS Category 1.3 Loops 070 11. M ACCT2001 Account 2001 - Telecommunication Plant in Service 160 11. N ACCT1220 Account 1220 - Material and Supplies 170 11. O ACCT3100 Account 3100 - Accumulated Depreciation 190 11. P ACCT3400 Account 3400 - Accumulated Amortization - Tangible 195 11. Q ACCT4340 Account 4340 - Net Noncurrent Deferred Operating Income Taxes 210 11. R ACCT2210 Account
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/m96-indx.pdf
                      • .......................................................... Chart 1.6 Penetration by Income ........................................................................................ Table 1.4 Penetration by Income - Critical Values ............................................................. Table 1.9 Penetration by Income - 1995 ............................................................................. Chart 1.4 Penetration by Labor Force Status ...................................................................... Table 1.7 Penetration by Labor Force Status - Critical Values ........................................... Table 1.12 Penetration by Labor Force Status - 1995 .......................................................... Chart 1.7 Penetration by State ............................................................................................ Table 1.3 Penetration by State - Changes - 1984 to 1995 .................................................. Table 1.2 Penetration by State - Changes - 1984 to 1995 - Map ....................................... Chart 1.3 Penetration by State - Critical Values ................................................................. Table 1.8 Penetration by State - 1995 - Map ...................................................................... Chart 1.2 Pool - NECA - Common Line ............................................................................ Table 7.1 Pool - NECA - Common Line
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-1.pdf
                      • the known operations of the filer. Some corrections have been made based on supplemental filer information. Nonetheless, disaggregated data are likely to be less accurate than industry totals. Table 1.1 shows the major components of telecommunications revenues for 2001. This table was created by simply aggregating the revenues in the major classifications designated on Form 499- A. Tables 1.2 and 1.3 provide a look at annual industry revenues over time. Generally, Form 499-A revenue data can be tabulated in two distinct ways: by type of service provided and by type of business. Table 1.2 categorizes revenues by type of service and shows, for example, that carriers reported $74.7 billion in wireless service revenues for 2001. This total includes wireless service revenues
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
                      • 1946 1951 1956 1961 1966 1971 1976 1981 1986 1991 1996 2001 CPI All Items CPI Telephone Services 7 - 5 1978 7.1% 9.0% 0.9% 1979 8.3 13.3 0.7 1980 9.2 12.5 4.6 1981 9.3 8.9 11.7 1982 6.2 3.8 7.2 1983 3.9 3.8 3.6 1984 3.7 3.9 9.2 1985 3.2 3.8 4.7 1986 2.2 1.1 2.7 1987 3.0 4.4 -1.3 1988 3.4 4.4 1.3 1989 3.8 4.6 -0.3 1990 3.9 6.1 -0.4 1991 3.6 3.1 3.5 1992 2.4 2.9 -0.3 1993 2.4 2.7 1.8 1994 2.1 2.7 0.7 1995 2.2 2.5 1.2 1996 1.9 3.3 2.1 1997 1.9 1.7 0.2 1998 1.2 1.6 0.3* 1999 1.4 2.7 0.4 2000 2.1 3.4 -2.3 2001 2.4 1.6 1.3 2002 1.1 2.4 0.2
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-9.pdf
                      • 20.5 9.9 Average Repair Interval (hours) 3.0 2.4 4.0 3.4 3.2 8.1 3.3 14.6 4.7 LOCAL SERVICES PROVIDED TO RESIDENTIAL AND BUSINESS CUSTOMERS Percent Installation Commitments Met 93.0 99.4 99.0 99.5 98.6 98.6 98.5 98.7 97.8 Residence 97.1 99.5 99.1 99.6 98.7 98.6 98.7 98.9 98.2 Business 88.9 98.6 98.3 98.9 98.0 97.8 96.7 96.8 94.9 Average Installation Interval (days) 1.3 0.6 2.1 1.4 1.6 1.1 1.3 0.6 1.6 Residence 1.0 0.5 2.1 1.2 1.6 1.0 1.2 0.4 1.5 Business 1.6 1.4 2.6 2.7 1.8 1.8 2.4 1.7 2.5 Average Out of Service Repair Interval (hours) 18.4 13.6 18.6 23.5 19.8 23.8 21.6 14.3 15.1 Residence 20.0 13.6 18.9 25.9 21.0 25.1 22.9 15.4 15.2 Business 10.6 13.5 17.1 12.1 13.2
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-intro.pdf
                      • Trust Land: Federal ..........Table 2.14 Subscribership - Household - United States ........................................................... Table 6.1 Switch Downtime and Trunk Blocking ................................................................... Table 9.2 Switch Downtime Causes ....................................................................................... Table 9.3 Switching Systems .................................................................................................. Table 10.1 Taxes ................................................................................................................ Table 11.11 Telecommunications Industry Revenues by Service .......................................... Table 1.2 Telecommunications Industry Revenues - Total ...................................................Table 1.1 Telecommunications Revenues by Type of Carrier ............................................. Table 1.3 Telecommunications Revenues - Interstate ........................................................ Table 1.16 Telecommunications Revenues - Intrastate ........................................................ Table 1.15 Telecommunications Revenues - Total - by State ................................................ Table 1.13 Telecommunications Revenues - 2001................................... ................... Table 1.14 Transmission Systems ............................................................................................. Table 10.2 Universal Service Program Requirements and Fund Factors ................................. Table 1.10 Universal Service Support - Distribution of Disbursements ........................... Chart 1.1 Universal Service Support Mechanisms
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
                      • known operations of the filer. Some corrections have been made based on supplemental filer information. Nonetheless, disaggregated data are likely to be less accurate than industry totals. Table 1.1 shows the major components of telecommunications revenues for 1997 through 2003. This table was created by simply aggregating the revenues in the major classifications designated on Form 499-A. Tables 1.2 and 1.3 provide a look at annual industry revenues over time. Generally, Form 499-A revenue data can be tabulated in two distinct ways: by type of service provided and by type of business. Table 1.2 categorizes revenues by type of service and shows, for example, that carriers reported $81.5 billion in wireless service revenues for 2002. This total includes wireless service revenues
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-6.pdf
                      • Housing Unit Available Telephone Penetration Households 6 - 11 Table 6.2 Telephone Penetration by State (Annual Average Percentage of Households with Telephone Service) State 1984 2003 Change Alabama 88.4% 91.7% 3.3% * Alaska 86.5 96.8 10.3 * Arizona 86.9 95.1 8.2 * Arkansas 86.6 91.0 4.5 * California 92.5 97.1 4.6 * Colorado 93.2 96.8 3.6 * Connecticut 95.5 96.8 1.3 Delaware 94.3 96.6 2.3 * District of Columbia 94.9 95.3 0.4 Florida 88.7 94.6 5.9 * Georgia 86.2 93.7 7.6 * Hawaii 93.5 97.3 3.8 * Idaho 90.7 94.5 3.8 * Illinois 94.2 91.7 -2.5 # Indiana 91.6 93.5 1.9 * Iowa 96.2 96.8 0.6 Kansas 94.3 95.9 1.5 Kentucky 88.1 94.6 6.4 * Louisiana 89.7 93.2 3.5 * Maine
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
                      • 1938 19431948 1953 1958 1963 1968 1973 19781983 1988 1993 1998 2003 CPI All Items CPI Telephone Services 7 - 6 1978 5.6% 9.0% 0.9% 1979 3.2 13.3 0.7 1980 -0.2 12.5 4.6 1981 2.5 8.9 11.7 1982 -1.9 3.8 7.2 1983 4.5 3.8 3.6 1984 7.2 3.9 9.2 1985 4.1 3.8 4.7 1986 3.5 1.1 2.7 1987 3.4 4.4 -1.3 1988 4.1 4.4 1.3 1989 3.5 4.6 -0.3 1990 1.9 6.1 -0.4 1991 -0.2 3.1 3.5 1992 3.3 2.9 -0.3 1993 2.7 2.7 1.8 1994 4.0 2.7 0.7 1995 2.5 2.5 1.2 1996 3.7 3.3 2.1 1997 4.5 1.7 0.2 1998 4.2 1.6 0.3* 1999 4.5 2.7 0.4 2000 3.7 3.4 -2.3 2001 0.5 1.6 1.3 2002 2.2 2.4 0.2
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-9.pdf
                      • (hours) 3.2 2.8 4.3 3.5 3.1 3.6 8.0 4.4 18.2 LOCAL SERVICES PROVIDED TO RESIDENTIAL AND BUSINESS CUSTOMERS Percent Installation Commitments Met 97.3 99.6 98.9 99.5 99.0 99.5 98.5 98.7 98.6 Residence 98.3 99.7 98.9 99.6 99.1 99.5 98.6 98.8 98.8 Business 90.1 98.8 98.2 99.2 98.3 98.9 97.5 97.1 96.0 Average Installation Interval (days) 1.4 0.4 1.5 1.7 2.0 1.3 1.1 1.5 0.5 Residence 1.1 0.4 1.5 1.5 1.9 1.0 1.0 1.4 0.5 Business 1.8 1.2 1.7 3.3 2.4 3.3 2.3 2.3 1.9 Average Out of Service Repair Interval (hours) 19.7 14.6 16.4 23.6 20.9 26.6 32.6 31.1 18.4 Residence 21.5 14.7 16.9 25.8 22.1 26.7 34.8 33.9 19.9 Business 10.6 13.8 14.1 13.0 14.4 26.1 23.7 16.0 11.2 Initial
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-intro.pdf
                      • Subscribership - Household - United States ........................................................... Table 6.1 Switch Downtime and Trunk Blocking ................................................................... Table 9.2 Switch Downtime Causes ....................................................................................... Table 9.3 Switching Systems .................................................................................................. Table 10.1 5 Index of Tables and Charts Taxes ................................................................................................................ Table 11.11 Telecommunications Industry Revenues by Service ............................................. Table 1.2 Telecommunications Industry Revenues - Total ...................................................Table 1.1 Telecommunications Revenues by Type of Carrier ..............................................Table 1.3 Telecommunications Revenues - Interstate ........................................................ Table 1.16 Telecommunications Revenues - Intrastate ........................................................ Table 1.15 Telecommunications Revenues - Total - by State ................................................. Table 1.13 Telecommunications Revenues - 2002................................... ................... Table 1.14 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs ...........................Table 8.3 Transmission Systems ............................................................................................. Table 10.2 Universal Service Program Requirements and Contribution Factors ..................... Table 1.10 Universal Service Support
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr97-0.pdf
                      • Penetration by Labor Force Status ...................................................................... Table 1.8 Penetration by Labor Force Status - Critical Values ........................................... Table 1.14 Penetration by Labor Force Status - 1996 .......................................................... Chart 1.7 Penetration by State ............................................................................................ Table 1.4 Penetration by State - Changes - 1984 to 1996 .................................................. Table 1.2 Penetration by State - Changes - 1984 to 1996 - Map ....................................... Chart 1.3 Penetration by State - Changes - States With and Without Lifeline Programs ... Table 1.3 Penetration by State - Critical Values ................................................................. Table 1.10 Penetration by State - 1996 - Map ...................................................................... Chart 1.2 Pool - NECA - Common Line ............................................................................ Table 7.1 Pool - NECA - Common Line - Revenue Sources ............................................. Chart 7.1 Pool - NECA - Traffic
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr97-1.pdf
                      • results can be compared over time with a great deal of confidence. Unfortunately, the results of the CPS cannot be directly compared with the penetration figures contained in the 1980 and 1990 decennial censuses. This is due to differences in sampling and survey methodologies and because of differences in the context in which the questions were asked. The 2 Tables 1.3, 1.9, and 1.15 of this section are derived from these raw data files. 3 The determination of the statistical significance of a change over time is discussed below. The critical value is dependent on the sizes of the samples from which the change is computed. 4 The responses from the additional Hispanic households are not included in Tables 1.4 through
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr97-5.pdf
                      • 1935. 579 Table 5.2 Annual Rate of Change in Price Indices GDP Chain-type CPI: CPI: Price Index All Items Telephone Services 1978 7.2% 9.0% 0.9% 1979 8.6 13.3 0.7 1980 9.2 12.5 4.6 1981 9.4 8.9 11.7 1982 6.2 3.8 7.2 1983 4.3 3.8 3.6 1984 3.7 3.9 9.2 1985 3.6 3.8 4.7 1986 2.5 1.1 2.7 1987 3.1 4.4 -1.3 1988 3.6 4.4 1.3 1989 4.2 4.6 -0.3 1990 4.3 6.1 -0.4 1991 4.0 3.1 3.5 1992 2.8 2.9 -0.3 1993 2.6 2.7 1.8 1994 2.3 2.7 0.7 1995 2.5 2.5 1.2 1996 2.1 3.0 1.5 1997* 2.5 3.6 * The 1997 CPI changes are measured April through April. -5 0 5 10 15 Percent Change from Prior Year 1978
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-0.pdf
                      • Table 8.21 Subscribership - United States ............................................................................ Table 6.1 Switch Downtime and Trunk Blocking ............................................................... Table 9.2 Switch Downtime Causes .................................................................................... Table 9.3 Switching Systems ............................................................................................. Table 10.1 Taxes - Federal Income ...................................................................................... Table 11.11 Taxes - Total Other ............................................................................................. Table 11.12 Telecommunications Industry Revenue - by Service .......................................... Table 1.2 Telecommunications Industry Revenue - by Type of Carrier .............................Table 1.3 Telecommunications Industry Revenue - Total ................................................... Table 1.1 Transmission Systems ......................................................................................... Table 10.2 Universal Service Fund by State ......................................................................... Table 3.9 Universal Service Fund by Study Area ............................................................... Table 3.19 Universal Service Fund High Cost Formulas ...................................................... Table 3.1 Universal Service Fund History .......................................................................... Table 3.2 Universal Service Fund Payment Projections - by Study Area ...........................Table 3.15 Universal Service Fund
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-1.pdf
                      • less than $10,000. To fill out the industry totals, data was added from a separate source -- worksheets filed in connection with Telecommunications Relay Services (TRS)1. Data for 1,138 additional carriers were taken from this source. As shown in Table 1.1, about 99% of telecommunications revenue was reported by carriers that contribute to universal service support mechanisms. Tables 1.2 and 1.3 compare 1997 revenue with revenue for prior years. Revenue data shown for 1992 through 1996 are derived from information filed on TRS worksheets. Universal service requirements include several mechanisms that help ensure that all Americans have access to affordable telecommunications service. In section 254(d) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. 56 codified at 47
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-6.pdf
                      • 6.7 * Georgia 88.9 92.2 3.3 Hawaii 94.6 96.1 1.5 Idaho 89.5 93.4 3.9 Illinois 95.0 93.3 -1.7 Indiana 90.3 94.5 4.2 * Iowa 95.4 97.3 1.9 Kansas 94.9 93.2 -1.7 Kentucky 86.9 93.6 6.7 * Louisiana 88.9 91.7 2.7 Maine 90.7 97.7 7.0 * Maryland 96.3 96.9 0.6 Massachusetts 94.3 94.0 -0.3 Michigan 93.8 95.3 1.5 Minnesota 96.4 97.7 1.3 Mississippi 82.4 89.3 6.9 * Missouri 92.1 93.6 1.5 Montana 92.8 93.9 1.1 Nebraska 94.0 96.7 2.7 Nevada 89.4 90.7 1.3 New Hampshire 95.0 95.6 0.6 New Jersey 94.1 93.7 -0.4 New Mexico 85.3 89.8 4.5 New York 90.8 94.7 3.8 * North Carolina 89.3 92.8 3.5 North Dakota 95.1 96.5 1.4 Ohio 92.2 95.4 3.2 * Oklahoma 91.5 91.5
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-7.pdf
                      • 7 - 5 TABLE 7.2 ANNUAL CHANGES IN MAJOR PRICE INDEXES GDP Chain-type CPI: CPI: Price Index All Items Telephone Services 1978 7.2% 9.0% 0.9% 1979 8.6 13.3 0.7 1980 9.2 12.5 4.6 1981 9.4 8.9 11.7 1982 6.2 3.8 7.2 1983 4.3 3.8 3.6 1984 3.7 3.9 9.2 1985 3.6 3.8 4.7 1986 2.5 1.1 2.7 1987 3.1 4.4 -1.3 1988 3.6 4.4 1.3 1989 4.2 4.6 -0.3 1990 4.3 6.1 -0.4 1991 4.0 3.1 3.5 1992 2.8 2.9 -0.3 1993 2.6 2.7 1.8 1994 2.3 2.7 0.7 1995 2.5 2.5 1.2 1996 2.3 3.0 1.5 1997 1.8 1.7 0.2 Sources: Bureau of Labor Statistics and Bureau of Economic Analysis -5 0 5 10 15 Percent Change from Prior Year
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-9.pdf
                      • LOCAL SERVICES PROVIDED TO RESIDENTIAL AND BUSINESS CUSTOMERS Percent Installation Commitments Met 98.6 99.7 98.7 97.6 99.1 99.2 97.3 98.1 98.9 Residence 99.1 99.7 98.8 98.5 99.2 99.3 97.8 98.5 99.1 Business 96.7 99.4 98.3 95.7 98.9 98.6 94.6 95.9 97.9 Average Installation Interval (days) 3.0 1.6 NA 6.7 2.7 1.4 1.9 3.1 2.9 Residence 2.6 1.4 NA 5.4 2.3 1.3 1.3 2.9 2.5 Business 4.2 3.3 NA 7.4 4.2 1.7 3.4 4.1 4.9 Initial Trouble Reports per Thousand Lines 226.4 242.1 289.1 323.6 156.8 214.3 184.8 198.0 242.7 Total MSA 224.6 245.6 284.4 335.5 155.6 218.3 183.5 187.0 NA Total Non MSA 245.6 200.1 308.2 247.2 181.9 222.1 189.3 226.2 NA Total Residence 279.2 280.5 322.2 373.0 194.5 258.7 208.4
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-6.pdf
                      • 3.9 * Georgia 86.2 92.1 5.9 * Hawaii 93.5 96.3 2.8 * Idaho 90.7 93.8 3.1 * Illinois 94.2 91.8 -2.4 ** Indiana 91.6 93.8 2.3 * Iowa 96.2 95.8 -0.4 Kansas 94.3 93.8 -0.5 Kentucky 88.1 92.8 4.6 * Louisiana 89.7 91.5 1.9 Maine 93.4 97.2 3.8 * Maryland 95.7 95.3 -0.4 Massachusetts 95.9 95.4 -0.5 Michigan 92.8 94.2 1.3 Minnesota 95.8 96.9 1.1 Mississippi 82.4 88.0 5.6 * Missouri 91.5 95.6 4.1 * Montana 91.0 95.3 4.3 * Nebraska 95.7 95.9 0.2 Nevada 90.4 93.1 2.8 New Hampshire 94.3 97.0 2.7 * New Jersey 94.8 93.9 -0.8 New Mexico 82.0 89.8 7.8 * New York 91.8 95.3 3.5 * North Carolina 88.3 93.9 5.6 * North Dakota 94.6 97.3
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-7.pdf
                      • 4.5 3.8 CPI telephone services*** 2.0 0.9 CPI major categories: - food & beverages * 3.0 - housing * 3.0 - apparel & upkeep 3.0 1.0 - transportation 3.7 2.4 - medical care 5.2 5.8 - recreation ** * 2.5 - other goods & services * 5.9 CPI public transportation 4.9 4.1 CPI piped gas 3.5 1.9 CPI electricity 2.2 1.3 CPI sewer & water maintenance * 4.9 CPI postage 4.1 2.8 Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics. * Series not established until after 1935. ** Series not established until 1998. Figure reflects annual change between 1992 and 1997. *** The CPI telephone service index was revised in December of 1997 CHART 7.1 0 50 100 150 200 1920192519301935194019451950195519601965197019751980198519901995 CPI All Items
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-9.pdf
                      • 3.7 2.5 3.3 10.7 4.7 2.1 5.1 8.9 3.1 LOCAL SERVICES PROVIDED TO RESIDENTIAL AND BUSINESS CUSTOMERS Percent Installation Commitments Met 98.3 99.1 98.7 98.1 99.0 99.0 97.8 98.0 98.8 Residence 98.4 99.2 98.9 98.5 99.0 99.1 98.3 98.3 99.0 Business 97.1 98.3 97.5 96.0 98.7 98.1 94.3 95.6 97.8 Average Installation Interval (days) 2.2 1.6 0.7 3.1 2.2 0.7 1.3 2.8 2.9 Residence 2.0 1.5 0.6 2.9 1.9 0.7 0.7 2.6 2.5 Business 3.5 2.6 1.4 5.3 3.4 0.7 3.4 4.2 5.1 Initial Trouble Reports per Thousand Lines 218.9 178.1 277.8 221.6 126.3 244.3 191.2 201.0 222.6 Total MSA 217.1 179.5 263.5 216.9 126.0 245.0 186.3 191.7 212.8 Total Non MSA 238.7 159.9 360.1 265.0 132.7 240.8 208.9 224.1 234.8
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-0.pdf
                      • Table 8.21 Subscribership - United States ............................................................................ Table 6.1 Switch Downtime and Trunk Blocking ............................................................... Table 9.2 Switch Downtime Causes .................................................................................... Table 9.3 Switching Systems ............................................................................................. Table 10.1 Taxes - Federal Income ...................................................................................... Table 11.11 Taxes - Total Other ............................................................................................. Table 11.12 Telecommunications Industry Revenue - by Service .......................................... Table 1.2 Telecommunications Industry Revenue - by Type of Carrier .............................Table 1.3 Telecommunications Industry Revenue - Total ................................................... Table 1.1 Telecommunications Revenues - All Carriers ..................................................... Table 1.7 Transmission Systems ......................................................................................... Table 10.2 Universal Service Fund by State ......................................................................... Table 3.9 Universal Service Fund by Study Area ............................................................... Table 3.19 Universal Service Fund High Cost Formulas ...................................................... Table 3.1 Universal Service Fund History .......................................................................... Table 3.2 Universal Service Fund Payment Projections -
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-1.pdf
                      • some carriers due to late filings or inadequate filings. The data contained in the universal service filings cover about 99% of industry revenue but less than two thirds of carriers. The remaining 1% of revenue was estimated using data filed on Telecommunications Relay Service (TRS) worksheets. Table 1.1 shows the major components of telecommunications revenue for 1998. Tables 1.2 and 1.3 compare 1998 revenue with revenue for prior years. Revenue data shown for 1992 through 1996 derives from information filed on TRS worksheets. Universal service requirements include several mechanisms that help ensure that all Americans have access to affordable telecommunications service. In section 254(d) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. 56 codified at 47 U.S.C.
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-7.pdf
                      • 4.5 3.8 CPI telephone services*** 2.0 0.9 CPI major categories: - food & beverages * 3.0 - housing * 3.0 - apparel & upkeep 3.0 1.0 - transportation 3.7 2.4 - medical care 5.2 5.8 - recreation ** * 2.5 - other goods & services * 5.9 CPI public transportation 4.9 4.1 CPI piped gas 3.5 1.9 CPI electricity 2.2 1.3 CPI sewer & water maintenance * 4.9 CPI postage 4.1 2.8 Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics. * Series not established until after 1935. ** Series not established until 1998. Figure reflects annual change between 1992 and 1997. *** The CPI telephone service index was revised in December of 1997 CHART 7.1 0 50 100 150 200 1920192519301935194019451950195519601965197019751980198519901995 CPI All Items
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-9.pdf
                      • SERVICES PROVIDED TO RESIDENTIAL AND BUSINESS CUSTOMERS Percent Installation Commitments Met 98.7 98.2 73.0 98.2 98.7 98.8 98.2 98.0 98.4 Residence 98.8 98.7 98.6 98.3 98.8 98.9 98.5 98.3 98.5 Business 97.8 95.0 96.8 97.4 97.9 98.1 96.4 95.7 97.6 Average Installation Interval (days) 2.3 2.4 0.6 1.2 2.4 0.7 1.6 3.0 4.1 Residence 2.2 2.2 0.7 1.1 2.2 0.7 1.3 2.8 3.9 Business 2.9 3.4 1.4 1.6 3.8 0.8 3.1 4.3 5.4 Initial Trouble Reports per Thousand Lines 216.9 154.6 286.5 190.7 155.7 223.9 196.0 201.7 240.7 Total MSA 213.2 155.0 262.5 190.6 NA 195.3 192.9 0.2 234.7 Total Non MSA 266.1 149.4 375.2 191.6 NA 375.4 207.3 0.2 253.2 Total Residence 277.5 195.2 325.5 232.1 NA 265.1 234.4 0.2
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
                      • Table 6.15 Subscribership - Effect of Do Not Disconnect Policies in Place for 120 Months ... Table 6.16 Subscribership - United States ................................................................................Table 6.1 Switch Downtime and Trunk Blocking ................................................................... Table 9.2 Switch Downtime Causes .......................................................................................Table 9.3 Switching Systems ..................................................................................................Table 10.1 Taxes ................................................................................................................Table 11.11 Telecommunications Revenue - by Service .......................................................Table 1.2 Telecommunications Revenue - by Type of Carrier ............................................. Table 1.3 Telecommunications Revenue - Total .............................................................Table 1.1 Transmission Systems .............................................................................................Table 10.2 Universal Service Program Requirements and Fund Factors ................................. Table 1.9 5 Universal Service Monitoring Report CC Docket No. 98-202 September 2000 Introduction and Summary This is the fourth report in a series of reports prepared by federal and state staff members for the Federal-State Joint Board in CC Docket No.
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
                      • Total 1999 Total 2000 1st Quarter - 2001 2nd Quarter - 2001 Lifeline Assistance $415.7 $437.5 $326.4 $158.7 $167.7 LinkUp 42.5 34.0 17.0 9.0 8.0 Incremental Toll Limitation 2.7 3.1 1.6 0.9 0.7 PICC Reimbursement 2.8 4.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 Prior Period True-Ups 0.0 0.0 -9.7 -3.8 -5.9 Administrative Expenses 1.7 2.1 0.8 0.4 0.4 Less Interest Income -3.2 -4.4 -1.3 -0.5 -0.8 Total Low-Income Programs $462.2 $476.7 $334.6 $164.4 $170.2 Note: Detail may not match totals because of necessary rounding. Source: USAC quarterly filings: November 2, 1999; January 30, 2000; May 2, 2000 (amended June 2, 2000); August 2, 2000; November 2, 2000; and February 6, 2001. Table 2.4 Federal Low-Income Programs Fund Size Projections for 1999, 2000 and 1st
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
                      • 4.5 State Code Reference ............................................................................................... Table 8.13 Subscribership - United States ................................................................................ Table 6.1 Switch Downtime and Trunk Blocking ................................................................... Table 9.2 Switch Downtime Causes ....................................................................................... Table 9.3 Switching Systems .................................................................................................. Table 10.1 Taxes ................................................................................................................ Table 11.11 Telecommunications Industry Revenues by Service .......................................... Table 1.2 Telecommunications Industry Revenues - Total ...................................................Table 1.1 Telecommunications Revenues by Type of Carrier ............................................. Table 1.3 Telecommunications Revenues � Interstate ........................................................Table 1.16 Telecommunications Revenues � Intrastate ........................................................Table 1.15 Telecommunications Revenues � Total � by State ................................................ Table 1.13 Telecommunications Revenues Used to Allocate Revenues by State ................... Table 1.14 Transmission Systems ............................................................................................. Table 10.2 Universal Service Program Requirements and Fund Factors ................................. Table 1.10 Universal Service Support - Distribution of Disbursements ........................... Chart 1.1 Universal Service
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/QualSvc/qual00.pdf
                      • Verizon South 98.2 98.6 98.5 98.4 98.5 Sprint 98.9 98.3 98.5 98.0 97.7 96 97 98 99 100 Years Percent of Commitments Met 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Composite Verizon Bell South SBC Qwest Sprint Percent Installation Commitments Met Chart 5 Average Installation Interval -- Local Services (Using Company Provided Composites) 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 BellSouth 0.6 0.6 0.7 1.3 1.3 Qwest 0.6 0.7 1.0 1.1 1.0 SBC Ameritech 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.1 2.1 SBC Pacific 1.9 2.8 2.2 1.5 1.8 SBC Southwestern 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 Verizon GTE 2.6 2.8 3.0 1.4 1.0 Verizon North 2.0 (Combined with Verizon South) Verizon South 1.5 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.5 Sprint 2.5 2.6 3.5 4.5 3.9 0 1 2 3 4
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/QualSvc/qual01.pdf
                      • Sprint 99.0 98.3 98.5 98.0 97.7 98.8 Chart 4 Percent Installation Commitments Met -- Residential Services (Using Company Provided Composites) Percent Installation Commitments Met 96.0 97.0 98.0 99.0 100.0 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Years Percent o f Co mmitments M et Composite Verizon BellSouth SBC Qwest Sprint 11 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 BellSouth 0.6 0.6 0.7 1.3 1.3 1.2 Qwest 0.6 0.7 1.0 1.1 1.0 0.6 SBC Ameritech 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.0 SBC Pacific 1.9 2.8 2.2 1.5 1.8 1.3 SBC Southwestern 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 1.0 Verizon GTE 2.6 2.8 3.0 1.4 1.0 0.8 Verizon North 2.0 (Combined with Verizon South) Verizon South 1.5 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.1 Sprint 2.5 2.6 3.5
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/QualSvc/qual02.pdf
                      • Services (Using Company Provided Composites) Chart 4 Percent Residential Installation Commitments Met 96.0 96.5 97.0 97.5 98.0 98.5 99.0 99.5 100.0 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Years Percent o f Co mmitments M et Weighted Composite * Weighted Verizon Avg BellSouth Weighted SBC Avg. Qwest Sprint 11 ARMIS 43-05 Report 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 BellSouth 0.6 0.7 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.1 Qwest 0.7 1.0 1.1 1.0 0.6 0.5 SBC Ameritech 2.1 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.1 SBC Pacific 2.8 2.2 1.5 1.8 1.3 1.2 SBC Southwestern 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 2.2 1.8 Verizon GTE 2.8 3.0 1.4 1.0 0.8 0.6 Verizon North (Combined with Verizon South) Verizon South 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.1 1.0 Sprint 2.6 3.5 4.5
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/QualSvc/qual03.pdf
                      • Residential Services (Using Company Provided Composites) Chart 4 Percent Residential Installation Commitments Met Large Price-Cap Carriers 97.0 97.5 98.0 98.5 99.0 99.5 100.0 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Years Percent o f Co mmitments M et Weighted BOC/Sprint Composite* Weighted Verizon Avg BellSouth Weighted SBC Avg. Qwest 13 ARMIS 43-05 Report 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 BellSouth 0.7 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.1 Qwest 1.0 1.1 1.0 0.6 0.5 0.4 SBC Ameritech 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.1 1.5 SBC Pacific 2.2 1.5 1.8 1.3 1.2 1.5 SBC Southwestern 0.7 0.8 0.8 2.2 1.8 1.9 SBC SNET 5.4 2.1 2.2 1.8 1.0 1.0 Verizon GTE 3.0 1.4 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.6 Verizon North (Combined with Verizon South) Verizon South 1.5
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/QualSvc/qual98.pdf
                      • 3.7 2.5 3.3 10.7 4.7 2.1 5.1 8.9 3.1 LOCAL SERVICES PROVIDED TO RESIDENTIAL AND BUSINESS CUSTOMERS Percent Installation Commitments Met 98.3 99.1 98.7 98.1 99.0 99.0 97.8 98.0 98.8 Residence 98.4 99.2 98.9 98.5 99.0 99.1 98.3 98.3 99.0 Business 97.1 98.3 97.5 96.0 98.7 98.1 94.3 95.6 97.8 Average Installation Interval (days) 2.2 1.6 0.7 3.1 2.2 0.7 1.3 2.8 2.9 Residence 2.0 1.5 0.6 2.9 1.9 0.7 0.7 2.6 2.5 Business 3.5 2.6 1.4 5.3 3.4 0.7 3.4 4.2 5.1 Initial Trouble Reports per Thousand Lines 218.9 178.1 277.8 221.6 126.3 244.3 191.2 201.0 222.6 Total MSA 217.1 179.5 263.5 216.9 126.0 245.0 186.3 191.7 212.8 Total Non MSA 238.7 159.9 360.1 265.0 132.7 240.8 208.9 224.1 234.8
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/00socc.pdf
                      • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Table 1.3 - Changes Affecting Coverage of Table 1.2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/01socc.pdf
                      • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Table 1.3 - Changes Affecting Coverage of Table 1.2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/02socc.pdf
                      • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Table 1.3 - Changes Affecting Coverage of Table 1.2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Table
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/03socc.pdf
                      • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Table 1.3 - Changes Affecting Coverage of Table 1.2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/95socc.pdf
                      • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 TABLE 1.2-INTERCORPORATE RELATIONS OF COMMUNICATIONS CARRIERS AND CONTROLLING COMPANIES, DECEMBER 31, 1995. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 TABLE 1.3-CHANGES AFFECTING COVERAGE OF TABLE 1.2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/96socc.pdf
                      • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 TABLE 1.2-INTERCORPORATE RELATIONS OF COMMUNICATIONS CARRIERS AND CONTROLLING COMPANIES, DECEMBER 31, 1996. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 TABLE 1.3-CHANGES AFFECTING COVERAGE OF TABLE 1.2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/97socc.pdf
                      • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 TABLE 1.2-INTERCORPORATE RELATIONS OF COMMUNICATIONS CARRIERS AND CONTROLLING COMPANIES, DECEMBER 31, 1997. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 TABLE 1.3-CHANGES AFFECTING COVERAGE OF TABLE 1.2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/98SOCC.PDF
                      • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 TABLE 1.2-INTERCORPORATE RELATIONS OF COMMUNICATIONS CARRIERS AND CONTROLLING COMPANIES, DECEMBER 31, 1998. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 TABLE 1.3-CHANGES AFFECTING COVERAGE OF TABLE 1.2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/99socc.pdf
                      • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Table 1.3 - Changes Affecting Coverage of Table 1.2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/prelim02socc.pdf
                      • ongoing review of its accounting practices and restatement of financial results with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 3/ The division consists principally of Sprint Communications Company L.P. 4/ WilTel Communications has been engaged primarily in non-common carrier activities, but it is required to report to the FCC because of its long distance operations. 5 Statistics of Communications Common Carriers Table 1.3 - Changes Affecting Coverage of Table 1.2 Type No. Name of Company of Remarks Company Additions: 1 CenturyTel, Inc. Holding Parent company of CenturyTel of Washington, Inc. 2 CenturyTel of Washington, Inc. Telephone Company classified as a carrier subject to the Communica- tions Act of 1934, as amended. 3 Cox California Telcom, LLC d/b/a Cox Communications Interexchange Carrier became subject
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/scc00idx.pdf
                      • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Table 1.3 - Changes Affecting Coverage of Table 1.2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/scc01idx.pdf
                      • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Table 1.3 - Changes Affecting Coverage of Table 1.2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/scc02idx.pdf
                      • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Table 1.3 - Changes Affecting Coverage of Table 1.2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Table
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/scc03idx.pdf
                      • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Table 1.3 - Changes Affecting Coverage of Table 1.2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/scc04idx.pdf
                      • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Table 1.3 - Changes Affecting Coverage of Table 1.2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/scc05idx.pdf
                      • - Selected Data of Holding Companies of Reporting Carriers as of December 31, 2005 - 2006. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Table 1.2 - Intercorporate Relations of Wireline Affiliates of Subject Local Exchange Carriers, as of December 31, 2006. . . . . . . Table 1.3 - Toll Service Revenues by Provider. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/scc06_07idx.pdf
                      • - Selected Data of Holding Companies of Reporting Carriers as of December 31, 2007 - 2008. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Table 1.2 - Intercorporate Relations of Wireline Affiliates of Subject Local Exchange Carriers, as of December 31, 2007. . . . . . . Table 1.3 - Toll Service Revenues by Provider. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/scc93idx.pdf
                      • DATA OF HOLDING COMPANIES OF REPORTING CARRIERS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1993. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 TABLE 1.2-INTERCORPORATE RELATIONS OF COMMUNICATIONS CARRIERS AND CONTROLLING COMPANIES, DECEMBER 31, 1993. . . . . . . . 4 TABLE 1.3-CHANGES AFFECTING COVERAGE OF TABLE 1.2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/scc94idx.pdf
                      • DATA OF HOLDING COMPANIES OF REPORTING CARRIERS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1994. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 TABLE 1.2-INTERCORPORATE RELATIONS OF COMMUNICATIONS CARRIERS AND CONTROLLING COMPANIES, DECEMBER 31, 1994. . . . . . . . 4 TABLE 1.3-CHANGES AFFECTING COVERAGE OF TABLE 1.2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/scc95idx.pdf
                      • DATA OF HOLDING COMPANIES OF REPORTING CARRIERS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1995. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 TABLE 1.2-INTERCORPORATE RELATIONS OF COMMUNICATIONS CARRIERS AND CONTROLLING COMPANIES, DECEMBER 31, 1995. . . . . . . . 4 TABLE 1.3-CHANGES AFFECTING COVERAGE OF TABLE 1.2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/scc96idx.pdf
                      • 1.1-SELECTED DATA OF HOLDING COMPANIES OF REPORTING CARRIERS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 TABLE 1.2-INTERCORPORATE RELATIONS OF COMMUNICATIONS CARRIERS AND CONTROLLING COMPANIES, DECEMBER 31, 1996. . . . . . . 4 TABLE 1.3-CHANGES AFFECTING COVERAGE OF TABLE 1.2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/scc97idx.pdf
                      • 1.1-SELECTED DATA OF HOLDING COMPANIES OF REPORTING CARRIERS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1997. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 TABLE 1.2-INTERCORPORATE RELATIONS OF COMMUNICATIONS CARRIERS AND CONTROLLING COMPANIES, DECEMBER 31, 1997. . . . . . . 4 TABLE 1.3-CHANGES AFFECTING COVERAGE OF TABLE 1.2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/scc98idx.pdf
                      • 1.1-SELECTED DATA OF HOLDING COMPANIES OF REPORTING CARRIERS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 TABLE 1.2-INTERCORPORATE RELATIONS OF COMMUNICATIONS CARRIERS AND CONTROLLING COMPANIES, DECEMBER 31, 1998. . . . . . . 4 TABLE 1.3-CHANGES AFFECTING COVERAGE OF TABLE 1.2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/scc99idx.pdf
                      • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Table 1.3 - Changes Affecting Coverage of Table 1.2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/scard98.pdf
                      • Complaints in 1997 (Which Have Publicly Disclosed Revenues) APPENDIX B Complaints Revenue Complaint Company Served (Millions) Index WinStar Gateway Network, Inc. (long distance operations) 224 16 14.4 EqualNet Corporation 345 36 9.6 Group Long Distance, Inc. 298 48 6.2 OPTICOM (One Call Communications, Inc.) 500 118 4.2 American Network Exchange, Inc. (AMNEX) 435 116 3.7 USLD Communications Corp. 309 241 1.3 Communication TeleSystems International (Worldxchange) 409 345 1.2 Telco Communications Group, Inc. 370 555 0.7 LCI International, Inc. 571 1,001 0.6 Frontier Corporation (long distance operations) 752 1,322 0.6 EXCEL Communications, Inc. 613 1,180 0.5 Cherry Communications, Inc. 88 180 0.5 Tel-Save, Inc. 125 305 0.4 MCI Communications Corporation 4,364 17,150 0.3 Sprint Corporation (long distance operations) 2,065 8,595 0.2 VarTec
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/staterev.doc
                      • of LTS that a NECA pool member is eligible to receive in 1999 is the 1997 level of LTS (the difference between the 1997 CCL revenue requirements and the sum of 1997 CCL revenues using the NECA pool rate and 1997 subscriber line charge revenues) multiplied by the rate of growth of the national average NTS cost per loop. Table 1.3 presents data on the LTS mechanism. The first column presents the projected sum of annual support payments that are made in 1999 to local telephone companies in each state. The second column expresses the same payments on a per-loop per-month basis. Column 3 shows estimated contributions by state. These are computed by multiplying the total LTS payments by the ratio
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/in-region_applications/bellsouth_la/bellsout.html
                      • Public Notice of Revised Comment Cycle on Application by BellSouth Corporation, BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., and BellSouth Long Distance, Inc., for Provision of In-Region, Interlata Services in Lousiana (CC Docket No. 98-121) [5]7/9/98 Public Notice Requesting Comments on BellSouth 271 Application __________________________________________________________________ 8/28/98 REPLY COMMENTS: * [6]Zip File (127 KB Zipped)-- (9 files, 732 KB Unzipped) 8/4/98 COMMENTS: * [7]Zip File (1.3 MB Zipped)-- (44 files, 5.2 MB Unzipped) __________________________________________________________________ To download a zip file: click on the highlighted file name above, then use your browser's normal save function to save the zip file to your computer. Once it's on your system, use an [8]unzip program to unzip the downloaded file. __________________________________________________________________ List of Reply Comments # Commenter Filename 1 Ameritech ameritec.doc
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Enforcement/Orders/2000/da000420.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Enforcement/Orders/2000/da000420.txt
                      • N.E. Colorado Cellular, Inc., 12 FCC Rcd. 1185, � 18 (rel. Feb. 3, 1997). See 47 C.F.R. �� 22.911(d), 22.912(a). See Bachow's Reply to Answer, Exhibit M (filed Sep. 14, 1998). Convention on the Territorial Sea and the Contiguous Zone, Apr. 29, 1958, art. 10(1), 15 U.S.T. 1606, 516 U.N.T.S. 205. 47 C.F.R. �� 22.911(d), 22.912(a). See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 22.119(a). See Halprin v. MCI Telecommunications Corp., 13 FCC Rcd. 22568, � 31 (rel. Nov. 10, 1998); see also 47 U.S.C. �� 208, 503((b); see also 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(e). Federal Communications Commission DA 00-420 Federal Communications Commission DA 00-420 E H W a b d e q r F G H b c �@��� iI�G���
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Enforcement/Orders/2000/fcc00138.doc
                      • to investigate whether further enforcement action is warranted against Defendants for apparent knowing or repeated violations of Commission rules in relation to the facts raised in these complaint proceedings. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 201(b), 203(c), and 208 of the Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 154(j), 201(b), 203(c), 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.106 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 1.106, that the Application for Review of the Bell Atlantic Order filed by Frontier Communications Services, Inc. IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 201(b), 203(c), and 208 of the Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 154(j), 201(b), 203(c), 208, and
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/News_Releases/1998/et8002a.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/News_Releases/1998/et8002a.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/News_Releases/1998/et8002a.wp
                      • 5 27 1000.0 581.0 49332 1311 49268 1310 0.0 0.0 99.6 AL MOBILE 10 9 16.5 381.0 31418 1008 30422 998 0.0 0.0 99.9 AL MOBILE 15 47 494.6 521.0 25702 1024 25722 1039 1.7 1.0 99.6 AL MOBILE 21 20 198.9 436.0 21838 950 21326 882 0.3 0.1 100.0 AL MOBILE 42 41 50.0 183.0 11664 544 11453 533 1.3 0.5 100.0 AL MONTGOMERY 12 57 1000.0 610.0 43525 908 41216 868 0.0 0.0 99.9 AL MONTGOMERY 20 16 50.0 226.0 12730 369 12234 365 0.5 0.2 100.0 AL MONTGOMERY 26 14 50.0 183.0 12881 376 12595 372 4.0 2.9 100.0 AL MONTGOMERY 32 51 284.8 545.0 28418 538 28011 535 3.2 2.1 99.8 AL MONTGOMERY 45 46 50.0 308.0
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/1996/fcc96317.pdf
                      • 7 0.0 0.0 100.0 AK DILLINGHAM 2 11 16.2 305.0 33890 4 33677 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 AK FAIRBANKS 2 44 123.0 200.0 6744 77 6670 77 0.0 0.0 100.0 AK FAIRBANKS 9 5 1.1 152.0 13637 78 13637 78 0.0 0.0 100.0 AK FAIRBANKS 11 13 0.4 51.2 4966 76 4966 76 0.0 0.0 100.0 AK JUNEAU 3 34 1.3 78.9 2195 27 2155 27 0.0 0.0 100.0 AK JUNEAU 8 9 0.1 33.0 3096 27 771 25 0.0 0.0 100.0 AK KETCHIKAN 9 17 436.5 366.0 22177 17 22184 17 0.0 0.0 100.0 AK NORTH POLE 4 28 436.5 485.0 30801 79 30801 79 0.0 0.0 100.0 AK SITKA 13 4 0.1 47.2 2148 8 1132 8 0.0 0.0
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2000/fcc00163.doc
                      • center frequency. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories (LLNL) expects that UWB devices will operate with a center frequency anywhere between 20 MHz and 60 GHz, with bandwidths ranging from 150 MHz to 30 GHz. Multi Spectral Solutions, Inc. (MSSI) indicates that it has developed systems for the U.S. Government operating in the bands 30 - 50 MHz, 225 - 400 MHz, 1.3 - 1.7 GHz, 2.2 -2.7 GHz, 5.4 - 5.9 GHz and 9.0 - 11.0 GHz using bandwidths from 20 MHz to 2 GHz. Time Domain provides a table of potential UWB applications and the frequency ranges in which they are likely to operate. In this table, Time Domain suggests that GPRs and long range military communications will tend to operate
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01158.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01158.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01158.txt
                      • 47 C.F.R. � 2.1. 47 C.F.R. �2.1(c). Letter from Dale N. Hatfield, Chief of the Office of Engineering and Technology, to Mitchell Lazarus, August 18, 2000. Application for Review, September 20, 2000. The Commission gave public notice of receipt of the Application for Review. See DA 00-2317, October 17, 2000. See 47 C.F.R. ��15.257(a), (b), (c), and (d). 47 C.F.R. �1.3 grants the Commission authority to waive any provision of its rules provided good cause is demonstrated. See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969). 5 U.S.C. � 603. See Joint Petition for Clarification or, in the Alternative, Partial Reconsideration filed October 25, 2000 in ET Docket 99-231 on behalf of 3Comm, Apple Computer, Cisco Systems,
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fc97115a.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fc97115a.wp
                      • 0.0 100.0 ALBIRMINGHAM 42 30 159.2 421.0 26381 1330 23781 1253 0.3 0.3 99.9 ALBIRMINGHAM 68 36 50.0 314.0 14449 1016 13255 977 0.0 0.0 99.5 ALDEMOPOLIS 41 19 50.0 333.0 15153 121 15040 121 0.4 0.4 100.0 ALDOTHAN 4 36 1000.0 573.0 48620 784 44475 765 0.0 0.0 99.7 ALDOTHAN 18 21 50.0 223.0 13976 291 13879 291 2.7 1.3 100.0 ALDOZIER 2 59 1000.0 210.0 25755 466 21786 298 0.0 0.0 98.7 ALFLORENCE 15 14 50.0 223.0 12858 286 12862 285 2.6 5.0 99.4 ALFLORENCE 26 20 50.0 230.0 12022 258 10994 240 1.8 1.1 100.0 ALFLORENCE 36 22 50.0 221.0 12336 261 12098 259 8.1 3.6 100.0 ALGADSDEN 44 45 50.0 303.0 12500 628 11830 523 1.6 1.1
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024.pdf
                      • from KUHT-TV's transmitter site. UHS submits that it has obtained the tentative agreement of Civic Communication Corp. (Civic), the licensee of KTRE-TV, to KUHT-TV's use of channel 9 for DTV service, with ERP up to a maximum of 8.4 kW. UHS states that it has committed to resolve interference problems that might result to KTRE-TV, including potential power reductions to 1.3 kW. On June 16, 1997, UHS submitted a letter from Mr. Errol R. Kapellusch, Senior Vice President and General Manager of Civic License Holding Company, the licensee of KTRE-TV, consenting to operation of KUHT's DTV service on channel 9, based on a maximum power of 8.4 kW. Mr. Kapellusch further conditions his consent on KUHT-TV's agreement that in the event
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024a.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024a.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fc98024a.wp
                      • 5 27 1000.0 581.0 49332 1311 49268 1310 0.0 0.0 99.6 AL MOBILE 10 9 16.5 381.0 31418 1008 30422 998 0.0 0.0 99.9 AL MOBILE 15 47 494.6 521.0 25702 1024 25722 1039 1.7 1.0 99.6 AL MOBILE 21 20 198.9 436.0 21838 950 21326 882 0.3 0.1 100.0 AL MOBILE 42 41 50.0 183.0 11664 544 11453 533 1.3 0.5 100.0 AL MONTGOMERY 12 57 1000.0 610.0 43525 908 41216 868 0.0 0.0 99.9 AL MONTGOMERY 20 16 50.0 226.0 12730 369 12234 365 0.5 0.2 100.0 AL MONTGOMERY 26 14 50.0 183.0 12881 376 12595 372 4.0 2.9 100.0 AL MONTGOMERY 32 51 284.8 545.0 28418 538 28011 535 3.2 2.1 99.8 AL MONTGOMERY 45 46 50.0 308.0
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1998/fcc98078.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1998/fcc98078.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1998/fcc98078.wp
                      • have no competitive alternative in this market. On the other hand, in the occasional-use multiple carrier market, U.S. consumers have competitive alternatives to Comsat. We next assess the competitors and Comsat's market power in each of these product and geographic markets identified. 2.Market Participants Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-78 98 See 1992 Horizontal Merger Guidelines, 57 Fed. Reg. at 41556 �1.3 ("1992 Merger Guidelines") . 99 Id. 100 Barriers to entry represent anything that prevents an entrepreneur from instantaneously creating a new firm in a market. See Dennis W. Carlton and Jeffrey M. Perloff, Modern Industrial Organization, 919 (2d ed. 1994). 29 50. After determining the relevant service and geographic markets, the next step in our competitive analysis is to analyze
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1999/da990633.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1999/da990633.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1999/da990633.wp
                      • DIRECTV submitted a separate application to transfer control of two transmit/receive earth stations (Call Signs E930485 and E950153) from USSB to DIRECTV. That application was previously granted by the Satellite and Radiocommunication Division. USSB II, Inc., Consent to Transfer Control, File No. SES-T/C-19981217-01925 (March 15, 1999). See also Public Notice, Report No. SES-00061 (March 17, 1999). 2 47 C.F.R � 1.3. 3 47 U.S.C. � 100.19(a). 4 Application of USSB II, File No. 45-SAT-EXT-97, IBFS File No.: SAT-MOD-19970226-00020 (Feb. 26, 1997) ("USSB Extension Application"). 5 CBS, Inc., For Authority to Establish Interim Direct Broadcast Satellite Systems, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 92 FCC 2d 64 (1982) ("CBS I"). CBS Inc., For Modification of Construction Permit to Establish Interim Direct Broadcast Satellite Systems,
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1999/da992519.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1999/da992519.txt
                      • and 25 of the Commission's Rules to Permit Operation of NGSO FSS Systems Co-Frequency with GSO Terrestrial Systems in the Ku-band Frequency Range, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 14 FCC Rcd 1131 (1998) (proposing to amend NG104 to permit domestic NGSO FSS systems to operate in the10.7-11.7 GHz band). GE-4 Modification Application, FCC Form 312 at Exhibit D. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969). Id. See In the Matter of Amendment of Parts 2, 25, and 90 of the Commission's Rules to Allocate the 13.75-14.0 GHz Band to the Fixed-Satellite Service, Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 11951 (1996) at � 26. See Amendment of Parts 2 and 25 of the Commission's Rules
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1999/da992555.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1999/da992555.txt
                      • waive the section 214 benchmarks condition on the U.S.-Chile route. Therefore, we deny the request for waiver. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 1, 2, 4(i), 4 (j), 5(c), 201, 214 and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 152, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 214 and 303(r), and Sections 0.51, 0.261, 1.3, 1.80, 63.10 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.51, 0.261, 1.3, 1.80, 63.10, that TLD's petition for waiver of the Section 214 Settlement Rate Condition in the U.S.-Chile route IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Rebecca Arbogast Chief, Telecommunications Division International Bureau Telef�nica Larga Distancia de Puerto Rico, Inc.,
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1999/fcc99313.doc
                      • Government Security Committee ("GSC"), as hereinafter provided. The GSC shall be established no later than 30 days after the last of its members has received the appropriate security clearance. Until that time, oversight of the Company's protection of Classified, Controlled Unclassified, and Sensitive Information shall be the responsibility of the Company's designated representative identified in Section 7.3 of this Agreement. 1.3 Departure and Replacement of Principal Managers 1.3.1 The Company shall provide written notification to the DSS and the FBISC in advance, to the extent feasible, of the departure of a Principal Manager of the Company, and of any replacement for the departed Principal Manager. Any replacement for any departed Principal Manager shall meet the qualifications set forth in this Agreement.
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1999/fcc99394.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1999/fcc99394.txt
                      • to comply with the Order. EchoStar maintains that it can resolve these issues and make available public interest programming to the public on January 28, 2000. According to EchoStar, the delay is of little consequence because many of the public interest programmers seeking carriage will not be ready to start programming until after January 1, 2000. II. DISCUSSION 6. Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules allows the waiver of a rule provision ``if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule and such deviation will serve the public interest.'' In the DBS Public Interest Obligations Order, the Commission stated that DBS providers were required to make the public interest programming capacity available as soon as the rules became effective, which
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/2000/da000422.doc
                      • section 214 authorization). Telmex USA Notification. Public Notice, List of Foreign Telecommunications Carriers that are Presumed to Possess Market Power in Foreign Telecommunications Markets, DA 99-809 (rel. June 18, 1999). Telmex USA Notification; 47 C.F.R. �63.10 (a)(4). The notification appeared on a Public Notice released Jan. 31, 2000. In the Public Notice, the International Bureau granted, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. �1.3, Telmex USA's request for waiver of the sixty-day prior notification period in section 63.11(a) of the Commission's rules by reducing the notification period to forty-five days. In the Matter of Telmex International, Inc.: Notification of Foreign Affiliation Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. Section 63.11(a), Response of Telmex International, Inc. (filed Feb. 22, 2000) (Telmex Response). Rules and Policies on Foreign Participation
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/2000/da000702.doc
                      • coordination issues with other countries); MCI Order, 2 FCC Rcd at 234 (paras. 7-9) (extending the milestones for one of MCI's two licenses because a series of launch failures that disrupted the industry at that time, including the Challenger disaster, may have played a part in MCI's failure to begin construction of that satellite). Columbia Request at 6-7. See Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (WAIT Radio); Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. See also Comsat Corporation, Petition for Partial Relief from the Current Regulatory Treatment of Comsat World Systems' Switched
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/2000/da000909.doc
                      • control that preclude it from launching QuickBird-2 by April 2001. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Application File No. SAT-MOD-19990720-00074 IS GRANTED IN PART, and EarthWatch, Inc., IS AUTHORIZED to operate the satellite QuickBird-1 at an orbital inclination of 66� and the satellite QuickBird-2 at an orbital inclination of 98�. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, EarthWatch IS GRANTED a waiver of Section 25.117(e)(1) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 25.117(e)(1), for purposes of rescheduling the construction completion and launch milestones of QuickBird-2 to December 2000 and April 2001. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless extended by the Commission for good cause shown, this authorization shall become
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/2000/fcc00166.doc
                      • request makes Comsat's argument unconvincing. IV. Conclusion and Ordering Clauses For the foregoing reasons, we conclude that good cause has been shown and the public interest is served by granting BTNA a waiver of the Commission's direct access dominant foreign Signatory restriction. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that the petition for waiver filed by BT North America Inc., pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that this Order is effective on release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Magalie Roman Salas Secretary In the Matter of Direct Access to the INTELSAT System, Report and Order, FCC 99-236, 14 FCC Rcd 15703 (1999) (``Direct Access decision''). The Open Market Reorganization for the Betterment of International
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/2000/fcc00287.doc
                      • been successfully placed into orbit and the operations conform to the terms and conditions of this authorization. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Intelsat LLC requests for waiver of Sections 25.140(b), 25.202(a)(1), 25.202(g), 25.210(a)(1)&(3), 25.210(c), 25.210(i), 25.211(a), 25.210(j)(1), and 25.210(g)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 25.140(b), 25.202(a)(1), 25.202(g), 25.210(a), 25.210(c), 25.210(i), 25.211(a), 25.210(j)(1), and 25.210(g)(1), pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, ARE GRANTED as provided in this Order for the satellites as specifically indicated in Appendix C. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Intelsat LLC requests for waiver of Section 25.140(f) of our Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 25.140(f), pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, ARE GRANTED, as
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1998/pnin8220.pdf
                      • the rules. DATA SQUARE ITC-214-19980824-00580 International Telecommunications Certificate Global Facilities-based/Global Resale Services Application for authority to operate as a facilities-based carrier in accordance with the provisions of Section 63.18(e)(1) of the rules and also to provide service in accordance with the provisions of Section 63.18(e)(2) of the rules. Page 1 of 2 CORRECTIONS ITC-214-19980717-00496 TRANSATLANTIC COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, Transatlantic Communications, Inc.'s application, File No. ITC-98-544, has been removed from Streamline processing until futher notice. This application appeared on Public Notice Report No. TEL-171-A for streamline process, released July 24, 1998. TELECARRIER SERVICES, INC. ITC-214-19980824-00581 International Telecommunications Certificate Global Facilities-based/Global Resale Services Application for authority to operate as a facilities-based carrier in accordance with the
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1998/pnin8245.pdf
                      • license, per letter dated September 10, 1998. LOCATION: SITE ID: 1 201 TABOR ROAD, MORRIS, MORRIS PLAINS, NJ E890958 Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Surrender of Authorization SES-MOD-19941122-00248 AT&T CORP. Application for Modification Date Effective: 10/02/1998 Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service Licensee has surrendered license, per letter dated September 10, 1998. LOCATION: SITE ID: 1 ROAD 887 KILO 1.3, SAN ANTON, CAROLINA, PR E890982 Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Surrender of Authorization SES-MOD-19960417-01395 AT&T CORP. Application for Modification Date Effective: 10/02/1998 Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service Licensee has surrendered license, per letter dated September 10, 1998. LOCATION: SITE ID: 1 RTS. 202/206 NORTH, SOMERSET, BEDMINSTER, NJ E920075 Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Surrender of Authorization SES-MOD-19960522-01106
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9052.pdf
                      • degrees E.L. using 28.35-28.6 GHz, 29.25-29.5 GHz and 29.5-30.0 GHz bands for uplink and 18.3-18.55 GHz, 18.55-18.80 GHz and 19.7-20.20 GHz bands for downlink. Proposed services are non-common carrier and include Internet, voice, data and video transmission directly to domestic and international business enterprises. If necessary, Loral Orion -- Asia Pacific seeks a waiver of Section 25.114(c)(13) pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, to permit Loral Orion -- Asia Pacific to make its financial showing in accordance with the two-step financial qualification rules it argures were in effect as of the date its application was filed, or in the alternative, a deferral of the financial showing. S2219 SAT-LOA-19951109-00186 LORAL ORION ATLANTIC, L.P. Launch and Operating
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/da993036.doc
                      • / 418-2555 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 DA 99-3036 Tuesday, January 4, 2000 WAIVER OF THE SECTION 214 BENCHMARKS CONDITION Unless otherwise specified, the following procedures apply to the applications listed below: The applications listed below have been found, upon initial review, to be acceptable for filing pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. These applications shall not be deemed granted until the Commission affirmatively acts upon the application, either by public notice or by written order. Operation for which authorization is sought may not commence except in accordance with any terms or conditions imposed by the Commission. Unless otherwise specified, interested parties may file comments
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0017.pdf
                      • Date Effective: 01/14/2000 Class of Station: Grant of Authority Fixed Earth Stations Renewal 12/26/1999 - 12/26/2009 Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service SITE ID: 1 MATAGORDA, PALACIOS, TX LOCATION: E900051 SES-RWL-19991228-02313 MINNESOTA PUBLIC RADIO Date Effective: 01/14/2000 Class of Station: Grant of Authority Fixed Earth Stations Renewal 02/02/2000 - 02/02/2010 Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service SITE ID: 1 APPROX. 1.3 MILES ENE OF EUCLID, POLK, EUCLID, MN LOCATION: E900046 SES-RWL-20000107-00028 DIAMOND P SPORTS, LLC Date Effective: 01/14/2000 Class of Station: Grant of Authority Fixed Earth Stations Renewal 02/09/2000 - 02/09/2010 Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service SITE ID: 1 14375 MYERLAKE CIRCLE, PINELLAS, CLEARWATER, FL LOCATION: For more information concerning this Notice, contact the Satellite and Radiocommunication Division at 418-0719;
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2000/da001111.doc
                      • 00-89, RM-9872 Petitioner: SSR Communications Incorporated C. Michael Adkins 5116 Wesleyan Circle Macon, Georgia 31210 Proposal: Allot Channel 225A to Waynesboro, Georgia, as the community's third local FM service. Community Present Proposed Waynesboro, Georgia 265A, 296C3 225A, 265A, 296C3 Coordinates: 33-06-23 NL; 82-00-14 WL. Additional Information: The allotment of Channel 225A at Waynesboro requires a site restriction of 2.0 kilometers (1.3 miles) northeast to avoid a short-spacing to Station WKKZ, Channel 224C2, Dublin, Georgia, and Station WEAS-FM, Channel 226C1, Savannah, Georgia. FCC Contact: Leslie Shapiro, (202) 418-2189 3. Comments, reply comments, counterproposals and other pleadings filed in response to this multiple docket Notice of Proposed Rule Making should reference only the specific docket to which the filing pertains. The Commission's authority
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2000/da001905.doc
                      • comments and/or counterproposals to the following proposals: A. MM Docket No. 00-146; RM-9937 Petitioner: Robert Sanders 135 Highway 371 Marietta, Mississippi 38856 . Proposal: Allot Channel 250A at Marietta, Mississippi, as the community's first local aural transmission service. Community Present Proposed Marietta, Mississippi -- 250A Coordinates: 34-30-20 NL and 88-27-18 WL Additional Information: This allotment requires a site restriction of 1.3 kilometers (0.8 miles) east to avoid a short-spacing to the licensed sites of Station WWMS(FM), Channel 248C1, Oxford, Mississippi, and Station WZLQ(FM), Channel 253C1, Tupelo, Mississippi. FCC Contact: Sharon P. McDonald (202) 418-2180 B. MM Docket No. 00-147; RM-9938 Petitioner: The Parker Radio Project c/o Matthew H. McCormick, Esq. Reddy, Begley & McCormick 2175 K Street, N.W., Suite 350 Washington,
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2001/fcc01329.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2001/fcc01329.txt
                      • definition of the relevant geographic scope of relevant markets, see United States v. Philadelphia Nat'l Bank, 374 U.S. 321, 359 (1963) (defining relevant geographic market as an area in which a buyer may purchase a product or service from alternative sources, or in which the presence of other sellers restrains prices charged to buyers). 120 See 1992 Merger Guidelines � 1.3. 121 See, e.g. Philadelphia Nat'l Bank, 374 U.S. at 363 ("[A] significant increase in the concentration . . . must be enjoined in the absence of evidence clearly showing that the merger is not likely to have such anticompetitive effects."). See also 1992 Horizontal Guidelines at 41558 �� 2.1, 2.2; New York v. Kraft General Foods, 926 F. Supp. 321,
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1996/fcc96335.htm http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1996/fcc96335.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1996/fcc96335.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1996/fcc96335.wp
                      • than 20 percent of children 2 to 5, close to 12 percent of children 6 to 8, and just under 9 percent of children 9 to 11, were in the audience.[257]^(228) Thus, at 7:00 a.m. Monday through Friday, nearly four times as many young children are watching television than at 6:00 a.m. In other words, at 6:00 a.m. on weekdays, 1.3 million children are watching television. By 7:00 a.m., the number of children watching television is 5.1 million. Data also show that roughly as many (i.e., very few) young children are watching television at 6:00 a.m. as are watching at midnight.[258]^(229) With respect to weekend viewing, the same data show that less than 4 percent of children 2 to 17 were
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98315.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98315.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98315.wp
                      • 5 27 1000.0 581.0 49332 1311 49268 1310 0.0 0.0 99.6 AL MOBILE 10 9 16.5 381.0 31418 1008 30422 998 0.0 0.0 99.9 AL MOBILE 15 47 494.6 521.0 25702 1024 25722 1039 1.7 1.0 99.6 AL MOBILE 21 20 198.9 436.0 21838 950 21326 882 0.3 0.1 100.0 AL MOBILE 42 41 50.0 183.0 11664 544 11453 533 1.3 0.5 100.0 AL MONTGOMERY 12 57 1000.0 610.0 43525 908 41216 868 0.0 0.0 99.9 AL MONTGOMERY 20 16 50.0 226.0 12730 369 12234 365 0.5 0.2 100.0 AL MONTGOMERY 26 14 50.0 183.0 12881 376 12595 372 4.0 2.9 100.0 AL MONTGOMERY 32 51 284.8 545.0 28418 538 28011 535 3.2 2.1 99.8 AL MONTGOMERY 45 46 50.0 308.0
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1999/fcc99209.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1999/fcc99209.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1999/fcc99209.wp
                      • ownership, which promises would be enforced by the Commission.184 Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-209 185 See Louis DeArias, 11 FCC Rcd 3662, 3667 (1996) (delegating to staff authority to rule on uncontested one-to-a-market waiver requests that involve a proposed combination of 1 TV, 2 AM, and 2 FM stations in the top 100 television markets). 186 See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Wait Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972). 187 Any existing combination based on a five-factor waiver can be transferred together only if the combination meets our revised radio/TV cross-ownership rule or failed station waiver standard, at the time of transfer. 188 See, e.g., S.E. Licensee G.P., FCC 96-464 (released Nov. 27,
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/da000865.doc
                      • first full-time reception service to 411 people). Specifically, 4,829 people would go from three to two services, 1,843 people would go from four to three services, and 8,104 persons would go from five to four services. The reference coordinates for a Channel 280C2 allotment at Cheyenne, Wyoming are 41-08-17 North Latitude and 104-48-22 West Longitude with a site restriction of 1.3 kilometers (.64 miles) northeast. The reference coordinates for Channel 239C3 at Gering, Nebraska are 41-51-50 North Latitude and 103-42-20 West Longitude. We recognize that in Seabrook and Huntsville, TX, 10 FCC Rcd 9360 (Commission 1995), the Commission held that a second aural service to 455 persons was de minimis and did not trigger priority (2) in view of a differential
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/da002062.doc
                      • K. Shapiro, (202) 418-2180. D. MM Docket No. 00-89, RM-9872; 15 FCC Rcd 8964 (2000) Action: At the request of SSR Communications Incorporated, we are allotting Channel 225A to Waynesboro, Georgia, as the community's third local FM service. Coordinates: 33-06-23 NL; 82-00-14 WL. Additional Information: The allotment of Channel 225A at Waynesboro, Georgia, requires a site restriction of 2.0 kilometers (1.3 miles) northeast to avoid short-spacings to Station WKKZ, Channel 224C2, Dublin, Georgia, and Station WEAS-FM, Channel 226C1, Savannah, Georgia. FCC Contact: Leslie K. Shapiro, (202) 418-2180. E. MM Docket No. 00-111, RM-9900; 15 FCC Rcd 10902 (2000) Action: At the request of FBB Broadcasting, we are allotting Channel 281C to Fallon, Nevada, as the community's third local FM service. Coordinates:
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00059.doc
                      • 73.623(c), but without the allowance to create de minimis interference as defined in Section 73.623(c)(2). The same criteria for technical acceptability will apply to all amended applications and petitions submitted by applicants, regardless of whether the applicant had originally sought an NTSC allotment on a channel below channel 60, or in the range of channels 60-69. As provided in Section 1.3 of the rules, the Commission will consider individual requests for waiver of these provisions. We therefore find KB's request that we consider individual requests by pending applicants for new NTSC stations in areas affected by the Freeze Order, and collaterally that we afford pending applicants for NTSC stations on channels below 60 in freeze areas the same flexibility afforded applicants
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2001/fcc01123.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2001/fcc01123.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2001/fcc01123.txt
                      • WB Petition at 21). WB Petition at 21. Davis Opposition at 2-6 (citing Carolina Petition at 1-3; Kelly Petition at 11-14; WB Petition at 21). KM Reply at 5 (citing Section 336(f)(2)(A)(i)(II)). PAI Petition at 5-7(citing Report and Order at �� 17-20); Univision Petition at 6-7. Report and Order at � 20. PAI Petition at 7. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. 47 U.S.C. � 336(f)(2)(A)(i)(III). 47 U.S.C. � 336(f)(2)(A)(ii). Report and Order at �� 23-31. IBN Petition at 1-2; Tiger Eye Petition at 4-6. CBA Petition at 11-12; Grossman Petition at 2. Report and Order at �� 21-31. Report and Order at � 23. Tiger Eye Petition at 4-6. Id. at 4-5. See Main Studio and Program Origination Rules, 2 FCC
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2001/fcc01330.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2001/fcc01330.txt
                      • the signal strength requirements for the community of license. 63 See, e.g., Petitions for Reconsideration of MSTV/NAB/ALTV at 9; Joint Broadcasters at 5; APTS/PBS at 8; Delta College at 2-4; 64 Petition for Reconsideration of APTS/PBS at 8-9. 65 Of course, the Commission may waive any provision of its rules upon a showing of good cause. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Specifically, the FCC may exercise its discretion to waive a rule where "particular facts would make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest" and where "special circumstances" might warrant a waiver. WAIT (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 01-330 17 D. Construction Deadlines 41. A number of petitioners request that the Commission extend the May 1, 2002 DTV construction deadline for
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Public_Notices/MDS_Notices/mdaa0324.html
                      • 29 54 59 N. - Lon. 98 10 16 W. JACOBS CESER RD., APPROXIMATELY 2.8 MILES NE OF CANYON LAKE, FISCHER, TX Antenna C/L RCAMSL 592.55 meters File Number Applicant Channel(s) Station City & State BPMD-20000310AAA NUCENTRIX SPECTRUM RESOURCES, INC. 2A NOLANVILLE, TX Call Sign 20000310AAA Non-Common Carrier Status. Lat. 31 5 38 N. - Lon. 97 34 51 W. 1.3 W & 0.2 N OF INTERSECT GLEN HOLLOW RD & ST. RT. 439, NOLANVILLE, TX Antenna C/L RCAMSL 374.90 meters File Number Applicant Channel(s) Station City & State BPMD-20000309AAD NUCENTRIX SPECTRUM RESOURCES, INC. H3 TYLER, TX Call Sign 20000309AAD Non-Common Carrier Status. Lat. 32 19 21 N. - Lon. 95 14 8 W. 960 CR 219, TYLER, TX Antenna C/L
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Public_Notices/Radio_Cutoffs/pnmm9217.doc
                      • as a matter of right not later than the close of business on the cut-off date. Amendments filed pursuant to this notice are subject to the provisions of Section 73.3573 of the Commission's Rules. -FCC- Attachment APPENDIX BPED -990104MA NEW Beverly Beach FL Good Idea, Inc. REQ: 91.100 MHz; Channel No. 216A H Erp: KW; H Haat: M V Erp: 1.3 KW; V Haat: 57 M BPED -990104MN NEW Beverly Beach FL Community Public Radio, Inc. REQ: 91.100 MHz; Channel No. 216A H Erp: KW; H Haat: M V Erp: 0.5 KW; V Haat: 80 M BPED -981231MB NEW Favoretta FL Day Star Public Radio, Inc. REQ: 91.100 MHz; Channel No. 216A H Erp: KW; H Haat: M V Erp: 1.3
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/News_Releases/1998/nrmc8022.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/News_Releases/1998/nrmc8022.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/News_Releases/1998/nrmc8022.wp
                      • be unnecessarily dependent on the rest of society, and it deprives this country of the wealth of ideas and ability that people with disabilities have. With the demand for accessible telecommunications, Kennard said, people with disabilities have expanded employment opportunities. He noted "there is simply no industry in America with the opportunity for well-paying jobs like telecommunications. The U.S. needs 1.3 million new workers in information technology by 2006. People with disabilities can and should fill many of those jobs. "The fact is, that if we do things right, the burgeoning world of telecommunications should make it easier for those with disabilities to have meaningful, well-paid jobs. More and more, people will not have to hop in a car and drive
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Open_Proceedings/op990326.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Open_Proceedings/op990326.wp
                      • due March 31; replies April 7. Contact: Alan Thomas, Network Services Division at (202) 418-2338; TTY: (202) 418-2325. PN 3/17/99; DA 99-525 The National Exchange Carrier Association Petitions For Expedited Waiver of Part 69 of the Commission's Rules - Pleading Cycle Established On March 8, 1999, the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. (NECA) filed an expedited petition pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules requesting that the Commission waive Part 69 of the Commission's rules to permit NECA to establish various new rate elements to offer Switched Access Synchronous Optical Transport service. Comments due March 29; replies April 5. Contact: Renee Terry, Competitive Pricing Division at (202) 418-1520. CC 96-45 and 97-21; PN 3/17/99; DA 99-521 Universal Service Administrative Company
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Open_Proceedings/op990402.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Open_Proceedings/op990402.wp
                      • due March 31*; replies April 7. Contact: Alan Thomas, Network Services Division at (202) 418-2338; TTY: (202) 418-2325. PN 3/17/99; DA 99-525 The National Exchange Carrier Association Petitions For Expedited Waiver of Part 69 of the Commission's Rules - Pleading Cycle Established On March 8, 1999, the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. (NECA) filed an expedited petition pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules requesting that the Commission waive Part 69 of the Commission's rules to permit NECA to establish various new rate elements to offer Switched Access Synchronous Optical Transport service. Comments due March 29*; replies April 5. Contact: Renee Terry, Competitive Pricing Division at (202) 418-1520. CC 96-45 and 97-21; PN 3/17/99; DA 99-521 Universal Service Administrative Company
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp31.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp31.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp31.txt
                      • interacting with one another in an online community. The growth of the Internet is nothing short of explosive, driven by the invention in this decade of the World Wide Web, which gives consumers a user-friendly platform from which to access content in the online world. In 1993, the year the first commercial web browser hit the consumer market, there were 1.3 million computers linked to the Internet. In four short years, that number reached over 16 million, and an estimated 80 million Americans are online today. Americans are using the Internet to communicate with each other like never before, as email has become the communications medium of choice for millions of users. And the Internet is an unprecedented educational tool as
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Comments/fcc98055/210097-1.pdf
                      • startup - 1 percent. The tables below show the calculations from this model. 46 Program Type A B C D Average % MIX: 31.0 48.8 20.0 .2 100 * Months Months Months Months Months Function HC Min Max HC Min Max HC Min Max HC MinMaxHCMinMax Research 2 0.5 1 4 1 3 10 3 6 20 6 12 5 1.3 3 Specs/Design 3 1 2 6 3 8 20 10 18 100 18 24 8 3.88.17 Proto to Manuf 3 1 5 6 5 10 20 18 24 100 24 36 8 6.411.3 Manuf Startup 6 1 2 10 2 8 30 6 12 160 12 24 13 2.56.97 Total 3.5 10 11 29 37 60 60 96 14 29.4
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1997/da972530.pdf
                      • 1, 1997 (E911 Reconsideration Order). The original wireless E911 rules were adopted in Revision of the Commission's Rules To Ensure Compatibility with Enhanced 911 Emergency Calling Systems, CC Docket No. 94-102, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 11 FCC Rcd 18767, 61 Fed. Reg. 40348 (1996) (E911 First Report and Order). 2 See Sections 0.131, 0.331, and 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131, 0.331, 1.3. 3 47 C.F.R. � 20.18(c). Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. In the Matter of ) ) Revision of the Commission's Rules ) CC Docket No. 94-102 To Ensure Compatibility with ) RM-8143 Enhanced 911 Emergency Calling Systems ) ORDER Adopted: December 1, 1997Released: December 1, 1997 By the
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/da991930.doc
                      • directly or indirectly by Frontier or its subsidiaries. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i) and (j), 214(a), 214(c), 309, 310(b), and 310(d) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 214(a), 214(c), 309, 310(d), that the "Petition to Deny" filed by Price Communications Corporation IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that the "Motion For Extension of Time" filed by Price Communications Corporation and the "Expedited Request for Extension of Time" filed by Qwest Communications Corp. ARE GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, that the "Consolidated
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/da992547.doc
                      • technical rules with a general requirement that systems not interfere with television reception within a TV Channel 13 station's Grade B predicted contour. In this connection, we note that Section 95.855 of the Commission's Rules was modified to limit mobile RTU transmissions to four watts, and Section 95.863 - the duty cycle limitation - was removed. III. DISCUSSION 4. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules allows the waiver of a rule provision ``if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule and such deviation will serve the public interest.'' Celtronix claims that a special circumstance exists because the underlying purpose of the rules will not be served. While we recognize that the technical rules at issue are designed to protect
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/da992640.doc
                      • Petitioners have made the showings and commitments required by the AirCell Order, as amended, and the opposing carriers have not persuaded us that granting these identical waivers is otherwise contrary to the public interest, we hereby grant the Petitioners' requests for waiver of section 22.925 of the Commission rules. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE . Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1.3 and 22.119(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 22.119(a), that the requests of AirCell, Inc., ALLTEL Communications, Inc., American Rural Cellular, Inc., Centennial Cellular Corporation, CenturyTel Wireless, Inc., Kentucky RSA 4 Cellular General Partnership and Smith Bagley, Inc. d/b/a Cellular One of Northeast Arizona for waiver of section 22.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 22.925, ARE
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/da992667.doc
                      • auction procedures for 218-219 MHz Service). Competitive Bidding Second Report and Order, 9 FCC Rcd. at 2381 � 190. Id. at 2381-82 � 192. Styles Interactive, Inc. Application for Review of Denial of Petition for Reconsideration Seeking Waiver of IVDS Final Down Payment Deadline, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 12 FCC Rcd. 17987, 17991 � 6 (1997) (citing 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990)). Waiver Order, 9 FCC Rcd. at 6385 � 7; see also Auction of Interactive Video and Data Service Licenses Scheduled to Begin February 18, 1997, Order, 12 FCC Rcd 19, 20-1 � 4 (1997) (holding that "such issues as auction winners' confusion over equipment availability, disparate treatment
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/da992836.doc
                      • instance, Davis has failed to provide any evidence indicative of financial viability. Furthermore, there is no indication that Davis' failure to make it's second down payment resulted from miscalculation, inadvertence, or administrative complications. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE 11. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i) and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the Emergency Request for Contingent Waiver and Reinstatement of Licenses filed by Carl N. Davis on January 15, 1997, and amended on November 22, 1999, IS DENIED. 12. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.131 and 0.331 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.131 and 0.331. FEDERAL
                    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/da993017.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/da993017.txt
                      • (1998) (CMRS Forbearance Order). Id. at 16884-87. Id. In the Matter of GTE Airfone, Inc., Petition for Waiver of Section 20.15(d) of the Commission's Rules, 14 FCC Rcd. 7903 (Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, 1999). See also In the Matter of Iridium, U.S., L.P., Motorola Cellular Service, Inc., and Motorola Worldwide Information Network Services, DA 99-1688 (released August 23, 1999). See Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 37 C.F.R � 1.3; WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972). Federal Communications Commission DA 99-3017 Federal Communications Commission DA 99-3017 � � 0 $ % f g �r:�J�[�a�
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/fcc99022.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/fcc99022.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/fcc99022.wp
                        • accordingly we grant their applications for transfer of control. II. BACKGROUND A. The Applicants 2. PRTA is an instrumentality of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico ("Government").5 PRTA wholly owns PRTC, which is Puerto Rico's leading provider of telecommunications services, including local exchange, intra-island long distance, wireless, and Internet access services, in both business and residential markets.6 PRTC serves more than 1.3 million access lines, more than 155,000 cellular subscribers, and more than 237,000 paging customers.7 In addition to its cellular and paging licenses, PRTC holds licenses in Puerto Rico in the personal communications service (PCS), narrowband rural radiotelephone, common carrier point-to-point microwave, digital electronic messaging, telephone maintenance and private carrier paging, and fixed satellite services. 3. GTE Holdings is a wholly-owned
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/fcc99136.pdf
                        • 1997. Some operators even experienced quarters with churn as high as 5.5 percent. While cellular operators have lower churn, usually at or below 2 percent,117 their churn levels have grown from 1.9 percent in 1996 to 2.0 percent in 1998. Historically, Nextel has kept its churn around 1.0 percent. However, its churn has risen from 1.0 percent in 1996118 to 1.3 percent in 1997119 to 1.8 percent in 1998.120 Minutes-of-Use. One of the goals operators hoped to achieve by offering customers price plans with large bundles of low-price MOUs was to encourage increased overall usage of wireless services.121 Since, as mentioned above, much of the most active price competition has been occurring in digital services, both cellular and broadband PCS, it
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da000442.doc
                        • January 1, 1995. Opposition at 2. Id. at 4. Sagir filed a complaint on June 8, 1995, against NECC alleging an improper extension into its CGSA. The Commission granted Sagir's request for relief and ordered NECC to remove the unauthorized extension. See, Sagir, Inc. v N.E. Colorado Cellular, Inc. 13 FCC Rcd 23762(1998). 47 C.F.R. � 22.912(a). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; Wait Radio v FCC, 418 F.2d1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972). Id (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 00-442 Federal Communications Commission DA 00-442 � ` @& � 0 � � � � � �
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da000556.doc
                        • won at auction, then the Commission has stated that it will assess an initial default deposit of between three percent and twenty percent of the defaulted bid amount. Once the license(s) have been auctioned the total default payment will be calculated and the Commission will either assess the final balance or refund any amounts due to the defaulting bidder. Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules permits the Commission to waive its rules if good cause is demonstrated. Section 1.925 of the Commission's Rules provides that a waiver of the Commission's rules will not be permitted except upon an affirmative showing that either: (a) the underlying purpose of the rule will not be served in a particular situation and that granting the
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da000660.doc
                        • for ATC communications (namely, 117.975 MHz to 136.975 MHz). The listed frequencies are based on 25 kHz spacing. There is no provision in the Commission's Rules for operating on 8.33-kHz spaced channels as envisioned by the ICAO channel plan. Accordingly, type acceptance of dual spacing transceivers may not be obtained absent a waiver of Section 87.173(b). III. DISCUSSION . Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules permits waiver of any rule provision for good cause shown. We find that the waiver requested by TCC is warranted. We note, as an initial matter, that we have granted similar waivers regarding dual spacing transceivers. As noted in the Garmin Order, two industry standard setting organizations, RTCA, Inc. (RTCA) and Aeronautical Radio, Inc. (ARINC), have
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da000828.doc
                        • the Greenmail Waiver Notice, and permitting the withdrawal is in the public interest. Accordingly, we will approve Binghamton's request to withdraw the above-captioned application. We therefore will dismiss PA4's petition to deny as moot. 4. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and sections 0.331 and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.331, 1.3, the request to withdraw the above-captioned application filed by Binghamton Celltelco Cellular One on July 26, 1999 IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C � 154(i), and sections 0.331 and 1.939(g) of the Commission's rules, 47
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da001077.doc
                        • U.S., L.P., Motorola Cellular Service, Inc., and Motorola Worldwide Information Network Services, DA 99-1688 (released August 23, 1999) (Iridium Waiver Order). In the Matter of Stratos Mobile Networks, Order DA 00-82, WTB, rel. January 18, 2000. The two earlier decisions were the GTE Waiver Order, and the Iridium Waiver Order. Amendment to Waiver Request, filed February 8, 2000. See Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 37 C.F.R � 1.3; WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972). CMRS Forbearance Order, 13 FCC Rcd. at 16884. See In the Matter of Regulation of International Accounting Rates, CC Docket No. 90-337, Phase II, Fourth Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 20,063 (1996) (Flexibility Order). Id.
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da001161.doc
                        • file appropriate applications to accomplish the necessary divestitures by this date, whether to the contemplated carrier, to another carrier, or to a divestiture trust that complies with the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to sections 1, 2, and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 152, and 154(i), and sections 0.331, 1.3, 1.925(a), and 20.6(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 U.S.C. �� 0.331, 1.3, 1.925(a), 20.6(a), the Request for Extension of Waiver filed by VoiceStream Wireless Corporation and Omnipoint Corporation is GRANTED as indicated herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William W. Kunze Deputy Chief, Commercial Wireless Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 20.6. Pursuant to Section 20.6(e)(1), divestiture of interests exceeding the
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da001404.doc
                        • frustrated by application to the instant case, and that grant of the waiver would be in the public interest; or (2) in view of the unique or unusual factual circumstances of the instant case, application of the rule would be inequitable, unduly burdensome or contrary to the public interest, or the applicant has no reasonable alternative. Alternatively, under Commission rule 1.3, the Commission has authority to waive its rules if there is ``good cause'' to do so. American Wireless asserts three basic reasons as grounds for granting its waiver request. First, it asserts that prolonged negotiations with Bay Springs, as well as the additional time involved in obtaining Commission consent to the assignment (nearly four months in this instance), prevented American
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da001525.doc
                        • be served or would be frustrated by application to the instant case, and that grant of the waiver would be in the public interest; or (2) where petitioner establishes unique or unusual factual circumstances, application of the rule would be inequitable, unduly burdensome, or contrary to the public interest, or the applicant has no reasonable alternative. Alternatively, under Commission Rule 1.3, the Commission has authority to waive its rules if there is ``good cause'' to do so. 4. In its request, GTE states that because the assignment of the WPOI208 license from ELLTELL back to GTE occurred on June 20, 2000, GTE will not be able to meet the five-year benchmark requiring one-third coverage to the BTA by the June 23,
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da001606.doc
                        • Petitioners have made the showings and commitments required by the AirCell Order, as amended, and the opposing carriers have not persuaded us that granting these identical waivers is otherwise contrary to the public interest, we hereby grant the Petitioners' requests for waiver of section 22.925 of the Commission rules. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE . Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1.3 and 22.119(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 22.119(a), that the requests of AirCell, Inc., Douglas Telecommunications, Inc., and California RSA No. 3, Limited Partnership, a California Limited Partnership d/b/a Golden State Cellular, for waiver of section 22.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 22.925, ARE GRANTED, subject to the terms and conditions set forth In re
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da001762.doc
                        • be served or would be frustrated by application to the instant case, and that grant of the waiver would be in the public interest; or (2) where the petitioner establishes unique or unusual factual circumstances, application of the rule would be inequitable, unduly burdensome, or contrary to the public interest, or the applicant has no reasonable alternative. Alternatively, under section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, the Commission has authority to waive its rules if there is ``good cause'' to do so. 8. On the facts before us, we find that a partial waiver of our 220 MHz construction requirements is warranted. On a nationwide basis, NRTC holds a total of 22 channels in the 220 MHz service, but because these channels
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/er000828.doc
                        • the Greenmail Waiver Notice, and permitting the withdrawal is in the public interest. Accordingly, we will approve Binghamton's request to withdraw the above-captioned application. We therefore will dismiss PA4's petition to deny as moot. 4. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and sections 0.331 and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.331, 1.3, the request to withdraw the above-captioned application filed by Binghamton Celltelco Cellular One on July 26, 1999 IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C � 154(i), and sections 0.331 and 1.939(g) of the Commission's rules, 47
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00047.doc
                        • the CMRS LNP implementation deadline to November 24, 2002 under a section 10 forbearance analysis, we could have accomplished the same result by granting a waiver of the CMRS service provider LNP requirement in section 52.31(a) until November 24, 2002. The record for the CMRS LNP Forbearance Order contained sufficient evidence to satisfy the ``good cause'' waiver standard of section 1.3 of the Commission's rules. Specifically, the record demonstrated that the wireless industry needs additional time beyond the March 31, 2000 implementation deadline to finalize standards, produce software, and deploy number portability in their networks. The record also established that extending the deadline until November 24, 2002 will give CMRS carriers greater flexibility in that time-frame to complete network buildout, technical
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00051.doc
                        • Broadcasting, 8 FCC Rcd 1637, � 8 (stating that allegations within petitions and supporting affidavits which "consist of ultimate, conclusory facts or more general allegations on information and belief, supported by general affidavits . . are not sufficient." (quoting Gencom v. FCC, 823 F.2d 171, n.11). See 47 C.F.R. � 90.139(c) (1992) (Commission processing of applications). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (Suspension, amendment or waiver of rules). See 47 C.F.R. � 90.175 (1992) (Frequency coordination requirements). See 47 C.F.R. �� 90.119(a)(1), 90.119(a)(3) (1992) (FCC Form 574 shall be used to apply for new station authorizations and for modification of an existing authorization). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1102(6) (Schedule of charges for private radio service, Land Mobile Stations: (a) New, Reinstatement, Modification
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00053.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00053.txt
                        • marketed its IS-661 models at tradeshows, in brochures, by direct sales to prospective PCS operators and direct sales to major manufacturers, such as Nortel, which paid several million dollars for IS-661 licensing rights and, in 1995, began marketing IS-661. Id. at 36, 41. Omnipoint Opposition at 15-17, 20, 26-28. Third Report and Order, 9 FCC Rcd at 1339 n.11. Section 1.3 of our rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, provides that, for good cause shown, we may grant waivers of our rules either pursuant to a request or on our own motion. As discussed above, we believe that Omnipoint has shown that good cause exists for a waiver of the substantial use condition. VoiceStream/Omnipoint Public Interest Statement at 6, 11. Id. at
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00190.doc
                        • Application for Review at 13. Ordinarily, we do not consider questions of law or fact on application for review that are not first presented to the bureau or office that rendered the initial decision. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.115(c). However, we have waived this rule in the past where doing so was in the public interest. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (Commission may waive its rules for good cause); Sperzel v. NEC Telephone, Inc., 86 FCC 2d 97, 100 � 9 (1981) (waiver of section 1.115(c) and consideration of issue not presented to the designated authority was in the public interest); Silverman v. KOOL-TV, 63 FCC 2d 507, 507 n.1 (1977) (pursuant to section 1.3, waiver of section 1.115(c) was in
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00313.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00313.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00313.txt
                        • Atlantic, BellSouth, and GTE only supplied very general assertions that, absent lifting of the cap, they would face considerable difficulty rolling out 3G and other advanced broadband services. We agree with most of the commenters to the petitions that the petitioners failed to satisfy the waiver standard set forth either in the Biennial CMRS Spectrum Cap Order or in Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules. We also agree that Bell Atlantic failed to establish the basis for reversing our determination that the spectrum cap promoted the public interest, as would be necessary for granting a forbearance request. Finally, we find unpersuasive GTE's argument that the CMRS spectrum cap does not apply to the C and F block spectrum in the upcoming
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00366.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00366.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00366.txt
                        • antenna that: (1) provides adequate notice regarding potential radiofrequency safety hazards, e.g., information regarding the safe minimum separation distance required between users and transceiver antennas; and (2) references the applicable FCC-adopted limits for radiofrequency exposure specified in � 1.1310 of this chapter. (d) Local governments or associations may apply to the Commission for a waiver of this section under � 1.3. Waiver requests must comply with the procedures in paragraphs (f) and (h) of this section and will be put on public notice. The Commission may grant a waiver upon a showing by the applicant of local concerns of a highly specialized or unusual nature. No petition for waiver shall be considered unless it specifies the restriction at issue. Waivers granted
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/da981687.pdf
                        • and applications (9 22.139) should be removed. License trafficking provisions were necessary when comparative hearings and lotteries were prevalent. With competitive bidding procedures in place, these outdated restrictions are no longer necessary. l Restrictions on operation prior to grant of authorizations for paging and cellular should be eased in a manner similar to Part 10 1 guidelines (see 5 10 1.3 1). Under Part 10 1, fixed microwave applicants are permitted to operate systems at their own risk prior to the grant of an authorization if certain specific requirements are met (0 22.143 permits construction prior to grant, but not operation). l Developmental Licensing Guidelines (94 22.401 - 22.417): l Classification of developmental applications as "major" actions (0 22.123(b)) should be
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/pnwl8062.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/pnwl8062.wp
                        • CARMEN OK RO WSI661 06/11/1998 00454.47500 36-34-42.1 N 098-27-32.2 W CD - Paging and Radiotelephone File Number Applicant Name City State Purpose Call Sign Receipt Date Frequency (MHz) Latitude Longitude Area Op. 0000000262 PIONEER TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE, INC MCWILLIE OK RO WSI661 06/11/1998 00454.47500 36-33-03.1 N 098-22-53.2 W 0000000263 PIONEER TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE, INC. THOMAS OK RO WSI675 06/11/1998 00454.50000 35-44-38.1 N 098-45-01.3 W 0000000264 PIONEER TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE, INC MEDFORD OK RO WSI676 06/11/1998 00454.50000 36-47-49.1 N 097-42-00.1 W 0000000264 PIONEER TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE, INC POND CREEK OK RO WSI676 06/11/1998 00454.50000 36-40-06.1 N 097-48-02.1 W 0000000265 PIONEER TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE, INC. DRUMMOND OK RO WSI677 06/11/1998 00454.60000 36-17-53.1 N 098-02-17.2 W 0000000265 PIONEER TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE, INC. LAHOMA OK RO WSI677 06/11/1998 00454.60000 36-23-33.1 N
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/pnwl8065.pdf
                        • W 0000000380 AIRTOUCH PAGING PARK CITY UT RO KNKL30506/17/1998 00931.98750 40-40-58.8 N 111-31-24.7 W 0000000380 AIRTOUCH PAGING SALT LAKE CITY UT RO KNKL30506/17/1998 00931.98750 40-46-08.8 N 111-53-19.7 W 0000000381 AIRTOUCH PAGING PORTLAND OR RO KNKL39106/17/1998 00931.98750 45-29-24.4 N 122-41-53.3 W 0000000382 AIRTOUCH PAGING CAMAS WA RO KNKL91806/17/1998 00931.98750 45-40-34.4 N 122-22-43.3 W 0000000382 AIRTOUCH PAGING ENUMCLAW WA RO KNKL91806/17/1998 00931.98750 47-07-01.3 N 121-53-34.3 W 0000000382 AIRTOUCH PAGING ISSAQUAH WA RO KNKL91806/17/1998 00931.98750 47-32-40.3 N 122-06-32.4 W 0000000382 AIRTOUCH PAGING ORTING WA RO KNKL91806/17/1998 00931.98750 47-02-51.3 N 122-08-37.4 W 0000000383 AIRTOUCH PAGING FERNLEY NV RO KNKM46806/17/1998 00931.98750 39-29-11.6 N 119-17-33.6 W 0000000384 SHENANDOAH MOBILE COMPANY PARKVIEW VA RO KIY580 06/17/1998 00152.63000 38-28-16.4 N 078-52-56.0 W 0000000385 SHENANDOAH MOBILE COMPANY EDINBURG VA RO
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/pnwl8075.pdf
                        • MT. AIRY MD RO KNKM88006/10/1998 00931.86250 39-19-45.3 N 077-11-21.9 W 0000000722 MOBILEMEDIA PAGING, INC. OCEAN CITY MD RO KNKM88006/10/1998 00931.86250 38-22-52.4 N 075-10-30.6 W 0000000722 MOBILEMEDIA PAGING, INC. ODENTON MD RO KNKM88006/10/1998 00931.83750 39-05-00.3 N 076-42-31.8 W 0000000722 MOBILEMEDIA PAGING, INC. ODENTON MD RO KNKM88006/10/1998 00931.86250 39-05-00.3 N 076-42-31.8 W 0000000722 MOBILEMEDIA PAGING, INC. OWINGS MILLS MD RO KNKM88006/10/1998 00931.83750 39-27-01.3 N 076-46-35.9 W 0000000722 MOBILEMEDIA PAGING, INC. OWINGS MILLS MD RO KNKM88006/10/1998 00931.86250 39-27-01.3 N 076-46-35.9 W 0000000722 MOBILEMEDIA PAGING, INC. POOLESVILLE MD RO KNKM88006/10/1998 00931.83750 39-11-58.3 N 077-20-52.9 W 0000000722 MOBILEMEDIA PAGING, INC. POOLESVILLE MD RO KNKM88006/10/1998 00931.86250 39-11-58.3 N 077-20-52.9 W CD - Paging and Radiotelephone File Number Applicant Name City State Purpose Call Sign Receipt Date Frequency
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/pnwl8077.pdf
                        • N 091-54-39.6 W CD - Paging and Radiotelephone File Number Applicant Name City State Purpose Call Sign Receipt Date Frequency (MHz) Latitude Longitude Area Op. 0000000833 NELSON TELEPHONE COOPERATIVEEAU CLAIRE WI RM KNKM43506/17/1998 00075.74000 44-51-01.8 N 091-25-24.5 W 0000000833 NELSON TELEPHONE COOPERATIVENELSON WI RM KNKM43506/17/1998 00158.10000 44-25-38.8 N 091-59-57.5 W 0000000835 CELLCO PARTNERSHIP NEW YORK NY RM KEA763 06/18/1998 00152.51000 40-46-01.3 N 073-59-27.5 W 0000000835 CELLCO PARTNERSHIP NEW YORK NY RM KEA763 06/18/1998 00152.51000 40-46-01.3 N 073-59-27.5 W 0000000835 CELLCO PARTNERSHIP NEW YORK NY RM KEA763 06/18/1998 00152.57000 40-46-01.3 N 073-59-27.5 W 0000000835 CELLCO PARTNERSHIP NEW YORK NY RM KEA763 06/18/1998 00152.63000 40-46-01.3 N 073-59-27.5 W 0000000835 CELLCO PARTNERSHIP NEW YORK NY RM KEA763 06/18/1998 00152.69000 40-46-01.3 N 073-59-27.5 W 0000000835
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/pnwl8087.pdf
                        • AR RM KNKO56806/30/1998 00152.60000 36-01-08.2 N 094-13-12.7 W 0000001164 ALLTEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. HOT SPRINGS AR RM KNKD95306/30/1998 00152.84000 34-30-19.3 N 093-05-06.6 W 0000001164 ALLTEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. HOT SPRINGS AR RM KNKD95306/30/1998 00152.84000 34-30-19.3 N 093-05-06.6 W 0000001165 ALLTEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. PINE BLUFF AR RM KNKD95006/30/1998 00152.84000 34-13-35.3 N 091-59-59.5 W 0000001165 ALLTEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. PINE BLUFF AR RM KNKD95006/30/1998 00152.84000 34-17-01.3 N 091-01-58.4 W 0000001165 ALLTEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. PINE BLUFF AR RM KNKD95006/30/1998 00152.84000 34-17-15.3 N 092-02-02.5 W 0000001166 ALLTEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. LITTLE ROCK AR RM KNKC77606/30/1998 00075.50000 34-44-39.3 N 092-16-36.5 W 0000001166 ALLTEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. SEARCY AR RM KNKC77606/30/1998 00152.84000 35-16-01.3 N 091-46-25.5 W 0000001166 ALLTEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. SEARCY AR RM KNKC77606/30/1998 00152.84000 35-16-50.3 N 091-47-08.5 W CD - Paging
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/pnwl8089.pdf
                        • 44-30-28.4 N 123-34-25.3 W 0000001114 PIONEER TELEPHONE COOPERATIVEPHILOMATH OR RM KOK340 06/30/1998 00152.78000 44-30-28.4 N 123-34-25.3 W 0000001294 CYBERTEL ST. LOUIS PAGING CORPORATION ALTON IL RM KNKS24006/30/1998 00931.33750 38-54-08.1 N 090-11-43.3 W 0000001294 CYBERTEL ST. LOUIS PAGING CORPORATION BELLEVILLE IL RM KNKS24006/30/1998 00931.33750 38-31-03.1 N 089-58-09.3 W 0000001294 CYBERTEL ST. LOUIS PAGING CORPORATION BREESE IL RM KNKS24006/30/1998 00931.33750 38-39-10.1 N 089-32-01.3 W PUBLIC NOTICE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 1919 M Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20554 31 Report Number: ftp.fcc.gov Internet:http://www.fcc.gov Fax-On-Demand (202) 418-2830 News Media Information (202) 418-0500 Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Site-By-Site Accepted for Filing Date of Report: 08/05/1998 Below is a listing of applications, subject to the pre-grant notice and petition procedure of Section 309 of the Communications Act of 1934,
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/pnwl8103.pdf
                        • PAGING NETWORK OF TENNESSEE, INC. NAPLES FL MD KNKG56805/26/1998 00931.33750 26-12-56.3 N 081-46-56.3 W 0000001574 PAGING NETWORK OF TENNESSEE, INC. PALM CITY FL MD KNKG56805/26/1998 00931.33750 27-09-19.1 N 080-19-12.1 W 0000001574 PAGING NETWORK OF TENNESSEE, INC. PALM CITY FL MD KNKG56805/26/1998 00931.33750 37-07-20.4 N 080-23-20.1 W 0000001574 PAGING NETWORK OF TENNESSEE, INC. PUNTA GORDA FL MD KNKG56805/26/1998 00931.33750 26-46-58.2 N 082-02-01.3 W 0000001574 PAGING NETWORK OF TENNESSEE, INC. SWEETWATER FL MD KNKG56805/26/1998 00931.33750 25-46-24.3 N 080-25-16.1 W 0000001574 PAGING NETWORK OF TENNESSEE, INC. WEST PALM BEACHFL MD KNKG56805/26/1998 00043.20000 26-45-40.2 N 080-03-08.1 W 0000001576 PAGING NETWORK OF SAN FRANCISCO, INC. LOS GATOS CA MD KMA741 05/20/1998 00454.30000 37-06-38.8 N 121-50-40.8 W 0000001576 PAGING NETWORK OF SAN FRANCISCO, INC. DANVILLE CA MD
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/pnwl8130.pdf
                        • BARNETT DBA: STAR NET PAGING RICHARDSON TX MD KNKO62005/26/1998 00485.28750 32-59-03.4 N 096-42-50.9 W 0000001814 ROBERT L AND DEBORAH J BARNETT DBA: STAR NET PAGING SHERMAN TX MD KNKO62005/26/1998 00931.36250 33-42-38.3 N 096-34-20.9 W 0000001856 GTE NORTH INC DEKALB IL RO KDS784 06/26/1998 00152.84000 41-55-53.1 N 088-45-04.3 W 0000001856 GTE NORTH INC ROCHELLE IL RO KDS784 06/26/1998 00152.84000 41-55-29.1 N 089-04-01.3 W 0000001857 GTE NORTH INC ALEDO IL RO KDS788 06/26/1998 00043.58000 41-11-48.1 N 090-43-44.5 W PUBLIC NOTICE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 1919 M Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20554 53 Report Number: ftp.fcc.gov Internet:http://www.fcc.gov Fax-On-Demand (202) 418-2830 News Media Information (202) 418-0500 Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Site-By-Site Accepted for Filing Date of Report: 09/23/1998 Below is a listing of applications, subject to the
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/pnwl8152.pdf
                        • GTE CALIFORNIA INC 00158.10000 GTE CALIFORNIA INC 00158.10000 GTE CALIFORNIA INC 00158.10000 GTE CALIFORNIA INC 00158.10000 Page 4 LOMPOC CA 34-44-16.9 N 120-26-43.5 W LOS ANGELES CA 34-03-42.0 N 118-l 7-35.2 W LOS ANGELES CA 34-l 9-35.0 N 118-35-I 3.3 W MALIBU CA 34-04-32.0 N 118-39-33.3 W NEWBERRY PARK CA 34-09-52.0 N 118-54-27.3 W NEWBERRY PARK CA 34-09-53.0 N 118-54-l 1.3 W ONTARIO CA 34-04-00.0 N 117-39-12.1 w OXNARD CA 34-l I-32.0 N 119-l O-50.3 w PALMDALE CA 34-32-21.9 N 118-07-07.2 W PANORAMA CA 34-13-09.0 N 118-26-58.2 W PORTAL RIDGE CA 34-40-30.9 N 118-24-48.2 W RANCH0 CALIFORNCA 33-28-50.1 N 117-11-00.1 w RIVERSIDE CA 33-58-05.0 N 117-17-16.1 W SAN LUIS OBISPO CA 35-21-37.9 N 120-39-24.6 W SAN YNEZ CA 34-31-35.9 N 119-58-42.5
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/da991591.pdf
                        • Division), in which case the applicant must indicate in Exhibit E that it has filed a confidentiality request. Because the required information bears on applicants' qualifications, the FCC envisions that confidentiality requests will not be routinely granted. Waivers: Applicants requesting waiver of any rules must submit a statement of reasons sufficient to justify the waiver sought. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. C - 8 AUCTION-SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FCC REMITTANCE ADVICE, FCC FORM 159 UPFRONT PAYMENTS The following information supplements the standard instructions for FCC Form 159, and is provided to help ensure correct completion of the FCC Form 159 for upfront payments for Paging Upper Bands 929 and 931 MHz (Auction No. 26). Applicants need to complete FCC Form 159 carefully, since:
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/pnwl9060.pdf
                        • 0000005530 COOK TELECOM, INC. DBA: COOK PAGING BOTHEL WA RO KNKM58003/03/1999 00931.13750 47-48-12.3 N 122-14-07.4 W 0000005530 COOK TELECOM, INC. DBA: COOK PAGING BOTHELL WA RO KNKM58003/03/1999 00931.13750 47-43-58.3 N 122-15-26.4 W 0000005530 COOK TELECOM, INC. DBA: COOK PAGING BREMERTON WA RO KNKM58003/03/1999 00931.13750 47-32-51.3 N 122-46-57.5 W 0000005530 COOK TELECOM, INC. DBA: COOK PAGING BUCKLEY WA RO KNKM58003/03/1999 00931.13750 47-07-01.3 N 121-53-34.3 W 0000005530 COOK TELECOM, INC. DBA: COOK PAGING CAMAS WA RO KNKM58003/03/1999 00931.13750 45-40-34.4 N 122-22-43.3 W 0000005530 COOK TELECOM, INC. DBA: COOK PAGING CLINTON WA RO KNKM58003/03/1999 00931.13750 47-57-09.3 N 122-21-57.5 W 0000005530 COOK TELECOM, INC. DBA: COOK PAGING COMSMOPOLIS WA RO KNKM58003/03/1999 00931.13750 46-55-52.3 N 123-44-06.5 W 0000005530 COOK TELECOM, INC. DBA: COOK PAGING DES MOINES
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/pnwl9066.pdf
                        • RM KOR793 02/22/1999 00035.54000 44-00-10.4 N 123-06-52.3 W 0000005193 SIMS COMPANY, INC. GRANTS PASS OR RM KOR793 02/22/1999 00931.76250 42-22-55.4 N 123-16-33.2 W Page 21 CD - Paging and Radiotelephone File Number Applicant Name City State Purpose Call Sign Receipt Date Frequency (MHz) Latitude Longitude Area Op. 0000005193 SIMS COMPANY, INC. JUNCTION CITY OR RM KOR793 02/22/1999 00075.60000 44-16-47.4 N 123-35-01.3 W 0000005193 SIMS COMPANY, INC. JUNCTION CITY OR RM KOR793 02/22/1999 00075.76000 44-16-47.4 N 123-35-01.3 W 0000005193 SIMS COMPANY, INC. MCKENZIE BRIDGEOR RM KOR793 02/22/1999 00075.92000 44-00-18.4 N 122-15-18.1 W 0000005193 SIMS COMPANY, INC. MEDFORD OR RM KOR793 02/22/1999 00931.76250 42-17-56.4 N 122-45-00.1 W 0000005193 SIMS COMPANY, INC. MILWAUKIE OR RM KOR793 02/22/1999 00931.76250 45-27-16.4 N 122-32-59.3 W 0000005193 SIMS
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/pnwl9078.pdf
                        • OK RM KNKG73003/24/1999 00931.13750 36-05-34.3 N 096-04-22.9 W 0000010251 MOBILE PHONE OF OKLAHOMA SEMINOLE OK RM KNKG73003/24/1999 00931.13750 35-11-15.2 N 096-40-02.0 W 0000010251 MOBILE PHONE OF OKLAHOMA SHAWNEE OK RM KNKG73003/24/1999 00931.13750 35-18-18.2 N 097-05-29.0 W 0000010251 MOBILE PHONE OF OKLAHOMA STILLWATER OK RM KNKG73003/24/1999 00931.13750 36-07-04.1 N 097-00-06.1 W 0000010251 MOBILE PHONE OF OKLAHOMA TULSA OK RM KNKG73003/24/1999 00928.93750 36-09-01.3 N 095-59-25.9 W 0000010251 MOBILE PHONE OF OKLAHOMA TULSA OK RM KNKG73003/24/1999 00931.13750 36-09-01.3 N 095-59-25.9 W 0000010251 MOBILE PHONE OF OKLAHOMA VELMA OK RM KNKG73003/24/1999 00931.13750 34-25-38.3 N 097-40-32.1 W 0000010251 MOBILE PHONE OF OKLAHOMA VELMA OK RM KNKG73003/24/1999 00959.96250 34-25-38.3 N 097-40-32.1 W 0000010251 MOBILE PHONE OF OKLAHOMA VERNON TX RM KNKG73003/24/1999 00931.13750 34-08-37.3 N 099-16-22.2 W 0000010251
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/pnwl9081.pdf
                        • USA, INC. TALLAHASSEE FL RO KNKP42103/18/1999 00931.91250 30-29-03.7 N 084-19-26.6 W 0000007115 METROCALL USA, INC. TOLEDO OH RO KNKP42103/18/1999 00931.91250 41-38-43.1 N 083-36-21.7 W 0000007115 METROCALL USA, INC. TOM'S RIVER NJ RO KNKP42103/18/1999 00931.91250 39-57-06.4 N 074-12-14.5 W 0000007115 METROCALL USA, INC. TOPEKA KS RO KNKP42103/18/1999 00931.91250 39-03-08.0 N 095-40-22.9 W 0000007115 METROCALL USA, INC. TULSA OK RO KNKP42103/18/1999 00931.91250 36-09-01.3 N 095-59-25.9 W 0000007115 METROCALL USA, INC. VENTURA CA RO KNKP42103/18/1999 00931.91250 34-20-52.9 N 119-20-10.4 W Page 32 CD - Paging and Radiotelephone File Number Applicant Name City State Purpose Call Sign Receipt Date Frequency (MHz) Latitude Longitude Area Op. 0000007115 METROCALL USA, INC. VIDOR TX RO KNKP42103/18/1999 00931.91250 30-05-18.7 N 093-57-12.6 W 0000007115 METROCALL USA, INC. WARRENVILLE NJ RO
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/pnwl9158.pdf
                        • 080-49-09.1 W 0000015974 SKYTEL CORP. TOLEDO OH RM KNKG78303/29/1999 00931.93750 41-39-01.1 N 083-32-05.7 W 0000015974 SKYTEL CORP. TOLEDO OH RM KNKG78303/29/1999 00931.93750 41-39-01.1 N 083-32-05.7 W 0000015974 SKYTEL CORP. TOLEDO OH RM KNKG78303/29/1999 00931.93750 41-39-02.1 N 083-32-04.7 W 0000015974 SKYTEL CORP. TUCSON AZ RM KNKG78303/29/1999 00931.93750 32-13-20.2 N 110-58-16.3 W 0000015974 SKYTEL CORP. TUCSON AZ RM KNKG78303/29/1999 00931.93750 32-14-56.2 N 111-07-01.3 W 0000015974 SKYTEL CORP. VENTURA CA RM KNKG78303/29/1999 00928.88750 34-18-10.0 N 119-13-44.3 W 0000015974 SKYTEL CORP. VENTURA CA RM KNKG78303/29/1999 00928.88750 34-18-10.0 N 119-13-44.3 W 0000015974 SKYTEL CORP. VENTURA CA RM KNKG78303/29/1999 00931.93750 34-18-10.0 N 119-13-49.3 W 0000015974 SKYTEL CORP. WAIMANALO HI RM KNKG78303/29/1999 00931.93750 21-19-11.5 N 157-40-43.1 W 0000015974 SKYTEL CORP. WASHINGTON DC RM KNKG78303/29/1999 00928.88750 38-57-44.3 N 077-01-34.9
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/pnwl9161.pdf
                        • 096-50-31.3 W 0000016293 SKYTEL CORP. W. KINGSTON RI RM KNLM50503/29/1999 00931.43750 41-35-13.3 N 071-39-01.2 W 0000016297 SKYTEL CORP. ROUND ROCK TX RM KNLM80203/29/1999 00931.43750 30-26-41.7 N 097-47-04.0 W 0000016299 SKYTEL CORP. FLORENCE KY RM KNLM91803/29/1999 00931.43750 39-01-36.2 N 084-38-06.8 W 0000016299 SKYTEL CORP. FRANKFORT KY RM KNLM91803/29/1999 00931.43750 38-13-39.2 N 084-55-55.8 W 0000016300 SKYTEL CORP. PORTSMOUTH RI RM KNLP67303/29/1999 00931.43750 41-33-01.3 N 071-17-33.1 W 0000016300 SKYTEL CORP. PROVIDENCE RI RM KNLP67303/29/1999 00931.43750 41-49-19.3 N 071-25-00.2 W 0000016414 TELNET OF DICKINSON, INC. DICKINSON ND RM WSI674 05/25/1999 00152.06000 46-43-30.0 N 102-54-59.6 W 0000016414 TELNET OF DICKINSON, INC. DICKINSON ND RM WSI674 05/25/1999 00152.03000 46-55-15.0 N 102-43-49.6 W 0000016415 MOBILE-PAGING COMMUNICATIONSCOLMAN SD RM KNKD75006/10/1999 00454.15000 43-59-30.8 N 096-46-11.1 W 0000016415 MOBILE-PAGING COMMUNICATIONSMADISON SD
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/pnwl9171.pdf
                        • SARASOTA FL RM KNKI72704/16/1999 00152.15000 27-20-06.1 N 082-28-20.3 W 0000012588 QUALICOM ELECTRONICS CORPORATION SARSOTA FL RM KNKI72704/16/1999 00454.37500 27-20-07.1 N 082-25-12.3 W 0000012591 QUALICOM ELECTRONICS CORPORATION FORT MYERS FL RM KNKI73504/16/1999 00454.40000 26-38-51.2 N 081-51-53.3 W 0000012591 QUALICOM ELECTRONICS CORPORATION FORT MYERS FL RM KNKI73504/16/1999 00454.50000 26-38-51.2 N 081-51-53.3 W 0000012592 QUALICOM ELECTRONICS CORPORATION FORT MYERS FL RM WRW22704/16/1999 00454.35000 26-19-01.3 N 081-47-12.3 W 0000013216 BAXLEY RADIO-TELEPHONE BAXLEY GA RM KLF581 04/22/1999 00152.21000 31-46-33.7 N 082-21-11.4 W 0000013216 BAXLEY RADIO-TELEPHONE BAXLEY GA RM KLF581 04/22/1999 00152.60000 31-46-33.7 N 082-21-11.4 W 273 Report Number: Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Site-By-Site Accepted for Filing Date of Report: 07/21/1999 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION News Media Information (202) 418-0500 Washington, DC 20554 Fax-On-Demand (202) 418-2830 Internet:http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov PUBLIC
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/pnwl9244.pdf
                        • W 0000027013 OKLAHOMA RSA 3 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP SOUTHWESTERN BELL WIRELESS, INC. TONKAWA OK RO KNKN82109/21/1999 36-38-46.1 N 097-21-15.2 W 0000027013 OKLAHOMA RSA 3 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP SOUTHWESTERN BELL WIRELESS, INC. WELLSTON OK RO KNKN82109/21/1999 35-41-03.2 N 097-03-11.1 W 0000027014 COPPER VALLEY CELLULAR, INC. CORDOVA AK RO KNKQ40109/21/1999 60-31-28.1 N 145-41-43.2 W 0000027014 COPPER VALLEY CELLULAR, INC. LAKE LOUISE AK RO KNKQ40109/21/1999 62-11-01.3 N 146-31-13.9 W 0000027014 COPPER VALLEY CELLULAR, INC. MCCARTHY AK RO KNKQ40109/21/1999 61-23-43.4 N 142-47-38.4 W 0000027014 COPPER VALLEY CELLULAR, INC. NAKED ISLAND AK RO KNKQ40109/21/1999 60-38-42.8 N 147-20-55.1 W 0000027014 COPPER VALLEY CELLULAR, INC. PAXSON AK RO KNKQ40109/21/1999 62-58-03.5 N 145-28-14.0 W 0000027014 COPPER VALLEY CELLULAR, INC. SLANA AK RO KNKQ40109/21/1999 62-43-15.6 N 144-02-24.9 W 0000027015 MISSOURI RSA 8
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/pnwl9250.pdf
                        • ST. LOUIS PAGING CORPORATION WARRENTON 03/29/1999 00931.33750 38-49-23.1 N MO RM KNKO661 093-19-05.7 W 0000010543 CYBERTEL ST. LOUIS PAGING CORPORATION WARSAW 03/29/1999 00931.33750 38-14-17.0 N IL RM KNKS240 090-11-43.3 W 0000010544 CYBERTEL ST. LOUIS PAGING CORPORATION ALTON 03/29/1999 00931.33750 38-54-08.1 N IL RM KNKS240 089-58-09.3 W 0000010544 CYBERTEL ST. LOUIS PAGING CORPORATION BELLEVILLE 03/29/1999 00931.33750 38-31-03.1 N IL RM KNKS240 089-32-01.3 W 0000010544 CYBERTEL ST. LOUIS PAGING CORPORATION BREESE 03/29/1999 00931.33750 38-39-10.1 N IL RM KNKS240 089-52-37.3 W 0000010544 CYBERTEL ST. LOUIS PAGING CORPORATION CHESTER 03/29/1999 00931.33750 37-57-11.1 N IL RM KNKS240 089-52-37.3 W 0000010544 CYBERTEL ST. LOUIS PAGING CORPORATION CHESTER 03/29/1999 00931.33750 37-57-11.1 N IL RM KNKS240 090-11-20.4 W 0000010544 CYBERTEL ST. LOUIS PAGING CORPORATION COLUMBIA 03/29/1999 00931.33750 38-27-23.1 N
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/pnwl9261.pdf
                        • 57-47-l 8.2 N ALVA 26-42-29.2 N TX 101-51-18.6 W TX 101-51-18.6 W TX 101-51-19.6 W TX 101-51-19.6 W TX 101-51-19.6 W TX 101-51-19.6 W TX 101-57-55.6 W TX 102-26-08.7 W TX 101-00-25.5 W TX 100-57-55.5 w TX 101-51-18.6 W TX 101-51-18.6 W AR 092-09-28.5 W AR 092-09-28.5 W AR 092-22-07.5 w AK 152-25-51.8 W FL 081-36-23.2 W BONITA SPRINGS FL 26-20-01.3 N 081-43-52.3 W BONITA SPRINGS FL 26-20-01.3 N 081-43-52.3 W RM RM RM RM RM RM RM RM RM RM RM RM RM RM RM RM RM RM RM cCD - Paging and Radiotelephone Call Sign File Number Applicant Name Receipt Date Frequency (MHz) City Latitude State Longitude Purpose Area Op. KWU489 KWU489 KWU489 KWU489 KWU489 KWU489 KWU489 KWU489 KNKJ435
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/pnwl9311.pdf
                        • 099-05-03.2 W 0000053258 TEXAHOMA CELLULAR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP TIPTON 12/01/1999 06605.00000 34-30-24.2 N OK MD WML213 098-37-52.2 W 0000053259 TEXAHOMA CELLULAR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP CACHE 12/01/1999 02112.00000 34-35-37.2 N OK MD WML213 098-37-52.2 W 0000053259 TEXAHOMA CELLULAR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP CACHE 12/01/1999 06063.80000 34-35-37.2 N OK MD WML213 098-37-52.2 W 0000053259 TEXAHOMA CELLULAR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP CACHE 12/01/1999 06765.00000 34-35-37.2 N OK MD WMJ808 099-26-01.3 W 0000053260 TEXAHOMA CELLULAR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ALTUS 12/01/1999 02121.60000 34-39-05.2 N Page 11 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City OK MD WMJ808 099-26-01.3 W 0000053260 TEXAHOMA CELLULAR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ALTUS 12/01/1999 06745.00000 34-39-05.2 N CA MD WMN205 122-20-04.9 W 0000053483
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/pnwl9320.pdf
                        • 118-19-49.3 W 0000059078 KATLINK LLC BURBANK 12/16/1999 22625.00000 34-09-34.1 N CA NE 118-19-49.3 W 0000059078 KATLINK LLC BURBANK 12/16/1999 22675.00000 34-09-34.1 N CA NE 118-19-49.3 W 0000059078 KATLINK LLC BURBANK 12/16/1999 22725.00000 34-09-34.1 N CA NE 118-19-49.3 W 0000059078 KATLINK LLC BURBANK 12/16/1999 22775.00000 34-09-34.1 N CA NE 118-19-49.3 W 0000059078 KATLINK LLC BURBANK 12/16/1999 22975.00000 34-09-34.1 N CA NE 118-20-01.3 W 0000059079 KATLINK LLC BURBANK 12/16/1999 21525.00000 34-09-02.6 N CA NE 118-20-36.7 W 0000059080 KATLINK LLC BURBANK 12/16/1999 21225.00000 34-09-11.7 N CA NE 118-19-49.0 W 0000059081 KATLINK LLC BURBANK 12/16/1999 21775.00000 34-09-28.3 N CA NE 118-20-55.2 W 0000059082 KATLINK LLC BURBANK 12/16/1999 21575.00000 34-09-07.2 N CA NE 118-18-37.2 W 0000059083 KATLINK LLC BURBANK 12/16/1999 21475.00000 34-11-03.1 N CA NE 118-20-41.9
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000112.doc
                        • Division), in which case the applicant must indicate in Exhibit E that it has filed a confidentiality request. Because the required information bears on applicants' qualifications, the FCC envisions that confidentiality requests will not be routinely granted. Waivers: Applicants requesting waiver of any rules must submit a statement of reasons sufficient to justify the waiver sought. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. AUCTION-SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR FCC REMITTANCE ADVICE (FCC FORM 159) Upfront Payments The following information supplements the standard instructions for FCC Form 159, and is provided to help ensure correct completion of FCC Form 159 for upfront payments for Auction No. 30. Applicants need to complete FCC Form 159 carefully, since: Mistakes may affect their bidding eligibility; and Lack of consistency
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000191.doc
                        • ON NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.'S PETITION REGARDING PCS C AND F BLOCK SPECTRUM EXTENSION OF FILING DEADLINE FOR COMMENTS TO SBC COMMUNICATIONS INC.'S REQUEST FOR WAIVER Comment Date: February 14, 2000 Reply Date: February 22, 2000 Nextel Communications, Inc. (``Nextel'') has filed a petition requesting expedited rulemaking under Section 1.401, or in the alternative, waiver of the Commission's rules under Sections 1.3 and 1.925. Nextel seeks modification or waiver of the Commission's eligibility and bidding rules with respect to PCS C and F block spectrum. Section 24.709 of the Commission's rules restricts the eligibility for C and F block licenses to entities with total assets and gross revenues below specified levels. Nextel requests that the Commission allow companies other than such entities
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000292.doc
                        • Division), in which case the applicant must indicate in Exhibit E that it has filed a confidentiality request. Because the required information bears on applicants' qualifications, the FCC envisions that confidentiality requests will not be routinely granted. Waivers: Applicants requesting waiver of any rules must submit a statement of reasons sufficient to justify the waiver sought. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Attachment E AUCTION-SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR FCC REMITTANCE ADVICE (FCC FORM 159) Upfront Payments The following information supplements the standard instructions for FCC Form 159, and is provided to help ensure correct completion of FCC Form 159 for upfront payments for Auction No. 31. Applicants need to complete FCC Form 159 carefully, since: Mistakes may affect their bidding eligibility; and Lack
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000318.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000318.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000318.txt
                        • C and F block spectrum. Comments submitted in response to those Public Notices may, to the extent relevant, be incorporated by reference in comments submitted in response to this Public Notice. Commenters should address the sufficiency of the showings made by AT&T Wireless, BellSouth and Bell Atlantic in light of the requirements of 47 U.S.C. � 160, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 and any other public interest considerations. All comments should reference the DA number of this Public Notice (DA 00-318). Comments should be filed with the Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, TW B204, 445 12th St. S.W. Washington, DC 20554. Comments also should be provided to Steven Weingarten, Chief, Commercial Wireless Division, Room # 4-C224, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Federal
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000397.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000397.txt
                        • U.S.C. � 309(j)(3)(E)(ii). The bidding rules for the auction have been announced. Auction of Licenses in the 747-762 and 777-792 MHz Bands, Auction Notice and Filing Requirements for 12 Licenses in the 700 MHz Bands, Auction Scheduled for May 10, 2000, DA 00-292 (Feb. 18, 2000). See 47 C.F.R. � 0.331 (authority delegated to Wireless Telecommunications Bureau); 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (suspension, amendment, and waiver of Commission Rules). See also 5 U.S.C. � 553(b)(B). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202 / 418-2830 TTY 202 / 418-2555 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov S T $ $ �����PNG > �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� �� � �a�% Tf(c)
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000760.doc
                        • Waiver of the Eligibility Requirements of 47 C.F.R. Section 24.709 for the PCS C and F Block Auction and for Expedited Action, filed January 21, 2000 (seeking expedited consideration of request to waive eligibility rules in Auction No. 35 to facilitate their preparation for that auction). See 47 C.F.R. � 0.331 (authority delegated to Wireless Telecommunications Bureau); 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (suspension, amendment, and waiver of Commission Rules). See also 5 U.S.C. � 553(b)(B). We note also that there are pending petitions for reconsideration on spectrum cap issues. See "Petitions for Reconsideration and Clarification of Action in Rulemaking Proceedings," Public Notice, Report No. 2387 (rel. February 8, 2000). See "Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Seeks Comment on SBC Communications Inc.'s Request for Waiver
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001100.doc
                        • 4-A337), in which case the applicant must indicate in Exhibit E that it has filed a confidentiality request. Because the required information bears on applicants' qualifications, the FCC envisions that confidentiality requests will not be routinely granted. Waivers: Applicants requesting waiver of any rules must submit a statement of reasons sufficient to justify the waiver sought. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. X. ATTACHMENT E AUCTION-SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR FCC REMITTANCE ADVICE (FCC FORM 159) Upfront Payments The following information supplements the standard instructions for FCC Form 159, and is provided to help ensure correct completion of FCC Form 159 for upfront payments for Auction No. 34. Applicants need to complete FCC Form 159 carefully, since: Mistakes may affect their bidding eligibility; and
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001113.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001113.txt
                        • notice of the account changes to the affected customers, following completion of the transfer, through a billing message in the next billing cycle. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by GTE Service Corporation, GTE North Incorporated, and GTE Communications Corporation on April 10, 2000, and supplemented on April 18, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon its release. Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001388.doc
                        • 4-A337), in which case the applicant must indicate in Exhibit E that it has filed a confidentiality request. Because the required information bears on applicants' qualifications, the FCC envisions that confidentiality requests will not be routinely granted. Waivers: Applicants requesting waiver of any rules must submit a statement of reasons sufficient to justify the waiver sought. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. ATTACHMENT E AUCTION-SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR FCC REMITTANCE ADVICE (FCC FORM 159) Upfront Payments The following information supplements the standard instructions for FCC Form 159, and is provided to help ensure correct completion of FCC Form 159 for upfront payments for Auction No. 36. Applicants need to complete FCC Form 159 carefully, since: Mistakes may affect their bidding eligibility; and Lack
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001486.doc
                        • 4-A435), in which case the applicant must indicate in Exhibit E that it has filed a confidentiality request. Because the required information bears on applicants' qualifications, the FCC envisions that confidentiality requests will not be routinely granted. Waivers: Applicants requesting waiver of any rules must submit a statement of reasons sufficient to justify the waiver sought. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Attachment e ACCESSING THE FCC NETWORK TO FILE FCC FORM 175 This attachment describes how to access the FCC Network from a system that is running the Microsoft Windows 95 or Microsoft Windows 98 operating system. This involves configuring dial-up network access and then performing the dial-up procedure. Note: Dial-up access to the FCC Network is not required to submit
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da002259.doc
                        • 4-A665), in which case the applicant must indicate in Exhibit G that it has filed a confidentiality request. Because the required information bears on applicants' qualifications, the FCC envisions that confidentiality requests will not be routinely granted. Waivers: Applicants requesting waiver of any rules must submit a statement of reasons sufficient to justify the waiver sought. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.925. Attachment E AUCTION-SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR FCC REMITTANCE ADVICE (FCC FORM 159-July 1997 edition) Upfront Payments The following information supplements the standard instructions for FCC Form 159, and is provided to help ensure correct completion of FCC Form 159 for upfront payments for Auction No. 35. Applicants need to complete FCC Form 159 carefully, since: Mistakes may affect their bidding
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/pnwl0003.pdf
                        • DOBSON KNOB 11/17/1999 06256.54000 35-49-19.5 N NC NE 081-57-17.4 W 0000063090 Cellco Partnership DOBSON KNOB 11/17/1999 06256.54000 35-49-19.5 N NC NE 081-57-17.4 W 0000063090 Cellco Partnership DOBSON KNOB 11/17/1999 06315.84000 35-49-19.5 N NC NE 081-57-17.4 W 0000063090 Cellco Partnership DOBSON KNOB 11/17/1999 06315.84000 35-49-19.5 N NC NE 081-57-17.4 W 0000063090 Cellco Partnership DOBSON KNOB 11/17/1999 06375.14000 35-49-19.5 N SC NE 081-14-01.3 W 0000063093 Cellco Partnership YORK 11/18/1999 06197.24000 34-57-53.5 N SC NE 081-14-01.3 W 0000063093 Cellco Partnership YORK 11/18/1999 06256.54000 34-57-53.5 N SC NE 081-14-01.3 W 0000063093 Cellco Partnership YORK 11/18/1999 06256.54000 34-57-53.5 N SC NE 081-14-01.3 W 0000063093 Cellco Partnership YORK 11/18/1999 06315.84000 34-57-53.5 N SC NE 081-14-01.3 W 0000063093 Cellco Partnership YORK 11/18/1999 06315.84000 34-57-53.5 N SC NE 081-14-01.3
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/pnwl0052.pdf
                        • MO AM 094-34-44.0 W 0000042125 BACKLINK LLC KANSAS CITY 02/22/2000 22775.00000 39-06-04.0 N MO AM 094-34-44.0 W 0000042125 BACKLINK LLC KANSAS CITY 02/22/2000 22825.00000 39-06-04.0 N OR AM 122-40-33.4 W 0000046939 BACKLINK LLC PORTLAND 02/23/2000 22875.00000 45-30-43.7 N OR AM 122-40-34.3 W 0000046940 BACKLINK LLC PORTLAND 02/23/2000 22575.00000 45-30-48.6 N OR AM 122-39-37.9 W 0000046941 BACKLINK LLC PORTLAND 02/23/2000 17880.00000 45-31-01.3 N OR AM 122-39-37.9 W 0000046941 BACKLINK LLC PORTLAND 02/23/2000 18040.00000 45-31-01.3 N OR AM 122-39-37.9 W 0000046941 BACKLINK LLC PORTLAND 02/23/2000 21375.00000 45-31-01.3 N OR AM 122-39-37.9 W 0000046941 BACKLINK LLC PORTLAND 02/23/2000 21675.00000 45-31-01.3 N Page 6 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/pnwl0060.pdf
                        • N CA NE 119-36-08.0 W 0000060909 Texaco Communications Inc. DERBY ACRES 11/19/1999 18595.00000 35-16-35.0 N FL NE 086-28-28.8 W 0000064694 WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS CORPDESTIN 10/28/1999 18142.00000 - 18580.00000 30-23-05.7 N FL NE 086-28-28.8 W 0000064694 WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS CORPDESTIN 10/28/1999 18142.00000 - 18580.00000 30-23-05.7 N VT NE 072-20-19.3 W 0000066341 Central Vermont Public Service Corp CLAREMONT 12/27/1999 06868.75000 43-22-11.3 N VT NE 072-00-01.3 W 0000066354 Central Vermont Public Service Corp BATH 12/27/1999 00958.20000 44-08-35.2 N TX NE 097-21-30.0 W 0000069253 Brazos Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.LA GUNA PARK 12/13/1999 06620.00000 31-51-28.6 N TX NE 097-22-19.0 W 0000069256 Brazos Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.LA GUNA PARK 12/13/1999 06780.00000 31-51-44.6 N WA NE 124-39-47.9 W 0000073804 KCPQ Inc NEAH BAY 01/13/2000 06093.45000 48-22-04.2 N WA NE 124-18-19.8
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/pnwl0096.pdf
                        • NE 114-36-49.8 W 0000106472 Yuma, Arizona RSA Limited PartnershipYuma 04/11/2000 10583.12500 32-41-41.2 N NY NE 073-51-49.5 W 0000107183 BACKLINK LLC Flushing 04/12/2000 22475.00000 40-43-52.0 N NY NE 073-51-49.0 W 0000107184 BACKLINK LLC Corona 04/12/2000 22425.00000 40-44-05.8 N NY NE 073-51-30.3 W 0000107185 BACKLINK LLC Rego Park 04/12/2000 22575.00000 40-43-45.0 N NY NE 073-52-09.7 W 0000107186 BACKLINK LLC Flushing 04/12/2000 22525.00000 40-44-01.3 N NY NE 073-51-52.1 W 0000107187 BACKLINK LLC Flushing 04/12/2000 21225.00000 40-44-05.3 N Page 23 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NY NE 073-51-52.1 W 0000107187 BACKLINK LLC Flushing 04/12/2000 21275.00000 40-44-05.3 N NY NE 073-51-52.1 W 0000107187 BACKLINK LLC
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/pnwl0109.pdf
                        • 0000112470 CORN BELT POWER COOPERATIVE LAKE CITY 04/06/2000 00952.10625 42-20-22.9 N IA MD WNTL203 093-36-30.8 W 0000112471 CORN BELT POWER COOPERATIVE KLEMME 04/06/2000 00928.56875 42-58-48.9 N IA MD WNTL203 093-36-30.8 W 0000112471 CORN BELT POWER COOPERATIVE KLEMME 04/06/2000 00952.56875 42-58-48.9 N TX MD WNEF700 098-15-53.0 W 0000112623 GUADALUPE VALLEY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE INC SCHERTZ 04/20/2000 06655.00000 29-33-26.8 N LA MD WNTT421 091-08-01.3 W 0000112636 TEXAS EASTERN COMMUNICATIONS INC WHITE CASTLE 04/20/2000 00928.78125 30-06-42.7 N LA MD WNTT421 091-08-01.3 W 0000112636 TEXAS EASTERN COMMUNICATIONS INC WHITE CASTLE 04/20/2000 00952.78125 30-06-42.7 N LA MD WNTN266 090-21-59.2 W 0000112698 TEXAS EASTERN COMMUNICATIONS INC LAROSE 04/20/2000 00928.51875 29-35-17.7 N LA MD WNTN266 090-21-59.2 W 0000112698 TEXAS EASTERN COMMUNICATIONS INC LAROSE 04/20/2000 00952.51875 29-35-17.7 N LA MD
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/pnwl0113.pdf
                        • W 0000115041 TEXAS EASTERN COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Gladeville 04/24/2000 00952.25625 36-09-14.0 N OK NE 097-35-07.0 W 0000115043 Duke Energy Field Services Assets LLCCOUNTY LINE 04/24/2000 00928.31875 34-29-58.0 N OK NE 097-35-07.0 W 0000115043 Duke Energy Field Services Assets LLCCOUNTY LINE 04/24/2000 00952.31875 34-29-58.0 N NC NE P 080-33-06.0 W 0000116428 UNION COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS MONROE 04/20/2000 00956.40625 34-59-03.0 N NV NE 117-23-01.3 W 0000116585 Sierra Pacific Power Company Goldfield 04/25/2000 00932.30625 37-42-03.8 N NV NE 117-23-01.3 W 0000116585 Sierra Pacific Power Company Goldfield 04/25/2000 00941.30625 37-42-03.8 N NV NE 116-41-19.3 W 0000116586 Sierra Pacific Power Company Battle Mountain 04/25/2000 00932.29375 40-37-17.7 N NV NE 116-41-19.3 W 0000116586 Sierra Pacific Power Company Battle Mountain 04/25/2000 00941.29375 40-37-17.7 N NV NE 118-45-10.5 W 0000116595
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/pnwl0121.pdf
                        • 084-21-06.7 W 0000119008 BACKLINK, L.L.C. Atlanta 05/01/2000 22775.00000 33-56-00.9 N GA MD WPOL700 084-20-43.0 W 0000119009 BACKLINK, L.L.C. Atlanta 05/01/2000 17840.00000 33-55-54.0 N GA MD WPOL700 084-20-43.0 W 0000119009 BACKLINK, L.L.C. Atlanta 05/01/2000 18040.00000 33-55-54.0 N GA MD WPOL700 084-20-43.0 W 0000119009 BACKLINK, L.L.C. Atlanta 05/01/2000 21625.00000 33-55-54.0 N MI MD WPOL476 083-03-01.6 W 0000119077 BACKLINK, L.L.C. Detroit 05/01/2000 19680.00000 42-20-01.3 N MI MD WPOL476 083-03-01.6 W 0000119077 BACKLINK, L.L.C. Detroit 05/01/2000 21275.00000 42-20-01.3 N MI MD WPOL476 083-03-01.6 W 0000119077 BACKLINK, L.L.C. Detroit 05/01/2000 21375.00000 42-20-01.3 N MI MD WPOL476 083-03-01.6 W 0000119077 BACKLINK, L.L.C. Detroit 05/01/2000 21475.00000 42-20-01.3 N MI MD WPOL476 083-03-01.6 W 0000119077 BACKLINK, L.L.C. Detroit 05/01/2000 21575.00000 42-20-01.3 N MI MD WPOL476 083-03-01.6 W 0000119077 BACKLINK,
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/pnwl0128.pdf
                        • 122-35-41.0 W 0000126692 WirelessCo, L.P. PETALUMA 05/10/2000 19265.00000 38-10-57.0 N ID NE 116-12-02.0 W 0000128105 AT&T Wireless Services of Florida, Inc. Boise 05/11/2000 17840.00000 43-36-57.0 N ID NE 116-54-55.0 W 0000128120 AT&T Wireless Services of Florida, Inc. Moscow 05/11/2000 06840.00000 46-48-41.0 N ID NE 117-00-11.0 W 0000128123 AT&T Wireless Services of Florida, Inc. Moscow 05/11/2000 06680.00000 46-44-56.0 N CA NE 118-21-01.3 W 0000128150 Cox Communication PCS, LP Pinteree 05/11/2000 19365.00000 34-27-49.0 N CA NE 118-22-53.3 W 0000128162 Cox Communication PCS, LP Vasquez Rocks 05/11/2000 17805.00000 34-26-53.0 N NM NE 106-40-59.1 W 0000128182 U S WEST Communications, Inc. ALBUQUERQUE 05/11/2000 19600.00000 35-01-48.2 N Page 10 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/pnwl0137.pdf
                        • LICENSES INC MEMPHIS 04/13/2000 00951.00000 35-08-36.3 N TN AM WPNI792 090-03-10.3 W 0000100162 CLEAR CHANNEL BROADCAST LICENSES INC MEMPHIS 05/11/2000 00951.00000 35-08-36.3 N Page 1 AS - Aural Studio Transmitter Link State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City NJ MD WME864 074-49-36.5 W 0000047768 WRNJ RADIO, INC. Washington 10/04/1999 00944.87500 40-49-01.3 N TN MD WPNI792 090-03-10.3 W 0000100162 CLEAR CHANNEL BROADCASTING LICENSES INC MEMPHIS 03/23/2000 00951.00000 35-08-36.3 N CA MD WLP775 122-23-30.0 W 0000131835 McCarthy Wireless, Inc. REDDING 05/16/2000 00949.50000 40-35-09.1 N VA NE 077-30-55.0 W 0000099312 Clear Channel Broadcasting Licenses, Inc.RICHMOND 03/23/2000 00951.00000 37-36-53.0 N FL NE 082-30-40.0 W 0000099815 Clear Channel Broadcasting Licenses, Inc.TAMPA 03/23/2000 00945.00000 27-53-33.0 N FL
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/pnwl0142.pdf
                        • 117-09-37.2 W 0000140355 BACKLINK LLC San Diego 05/25/2000 18000.00000 32-43-04.7 N CA NE 117-09-44.0 W 0000140356 BACKLINK LLC San Diego 05/25/2000 17880.00000 32-43-05.4 N NJ NE 074-02-05.9 W 0000140359 BACKLINK LLC JERSEY CITY 05/25/2000 18080.00000 40-42-58.2 N NJ NE 074-02-32.0 W 0000140360 BACKLINK LLC JERSEY CITY 05/25/2000 19640.00000 40-43-07.5 N MN NE 093-20-44.5 W 0000140364 KATLINK LLC MINNEAPOLIS 05/25/2000 19360.00000 44-58-01.3 N MN NE 093-20-44.5 W 0000140364 KATLINK LLC MINNEAPOLIS 05/25/2000 19360.00000 44-58-01.3 N MN NE 093-20-44.5 W 0000140364 KATLINK LLC MINNEAPOLIS 05/25/2000 19360.00000 44-58-01.3 N MN NE 093-20-44.5 W 0000140364 KATLINK LLC MINNEAPOLIS 05/25/2000 19400.00000 44-58-01.3 N Page 29 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/pnwl0194.pdf
                        • #6 - High School Heber 07/18/2000 21925.00000 34-25-43.1 N AZ AM 110-35-44.0 W 0000100247 Heber Overgaard Unified School District #6 - High School Heber 07/18/2000 23125.00000 34-25-43.1 N CA AM 121-22-26.8 W 0000160428 TRANSMISSION AGENCY OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA Patterson 07/17/2000 06715.00000 37-30-26.8 N CA AM 121-22-26.8 W 0000160428 TRANSMISSION AGENCY OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA Patterson 07/17/2000 06805.00000 37-30-26.8 N AK AM 146-50-01.3 W 0000165383 ALYESKA PIPELINE SERVICE COMPANY AGENT 30 Mi. S. of Valdez 07/21/2000 06541.25000 60-50-46.1 N IN AM WGX813 085-08-18.0 W 0000179203 INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY dba AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER FORT WAYNE 07/20/2000 06197.24000 41-04-40.0 N Page 31 MG - Microwave Industrial/Business Pool State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/pnwl0207.pdf
                        • 0000197397 MICHIGAN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY 07/31/2000 RO KVI34 0000197865 BROADWING INC 08/01/2000 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TX MD KNKN665 094-21-24.7 W 0000198001 WWC Texas RSA Limited Partnership Linden 08/01/2000 32-58-34.5 N MO MD KNKN825 092-00-59.6 W 0000198716 MISSOURI RSA 11/12 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP DUKE 08/01/2000 37-50-01.3 N SD MD KNKN272 098-14-58.7 W 0000199065 WWC License LLC Woonsocket 08/02/2000 44-02-26.3 N CO MD KNKR307 102-15-14.6 W 0000200150 N.E. COLORADO CELLULAR, INC. Stuart 08/03/2000 38-23-51.4 N CO MD KNKR307 102-04-15.6 W 0000200150 N.E. COLORADO CELLULAR, INC. Towner 08/03/2000 38-31-21.0 N AK MD KNKQ402 148-20-04.0 W 0000200535 AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES OF ALASKA, INC. Chickaloon 08/04/2000 61-48-25.0 N GA NE
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/pnwl0216.pdf
                        • 0000165243 Pacific Bell Wireless, LLC TEHACHAPI 08/16/2000 19385.00000 35-06-39.7 N CA AM WPON572 118-10-14.6 W 0000165265 Pacific Bell Wireless, LLC MOJAVE 08/16/2000 17825.00000 35-03-18.9 N MI AM 083-02-54.9 W 0000165268 BACKLINK LLC DEROIT 08/16/2000 17760.00000 42-19-46.6 N MI AM 083-02-54.9 W 0000165268 BACKLINK LLC DEROIT 08/16/2000 18080.00000 42-19-46.6 N MI AM WPOL476 083-03-01.6 W 0000165269 BACKLINK, L.L.C. Detroit 08/16/2000 19320.00000 42-20-01.3 N Page 4 CF - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City MI AM WPOL476 083-03-01.6 W 0000165269 BACKLINK, L.L.C. Detroit 08/16/2000 19640.00000 42-20-01.3 N MI AM WPOL476 083-03-01.6 W 0000165269 BACKLINK, L.L.C. Detroit 08/16/2000 21275.00000 42-20-01.3 N MI AM WPOL476 083-03-01.6 W
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/pnwl0219.pdf
                        • LLC Los Angeles 08/24/2000 17960.00000 34-02-44.9 N CA NE 118-15-21.9 W 0000210330 BACKLINK LLC Los Angeles 08/24/2000 17840.00000 34-02-51.2 N TX NE 096-52-21.0 W 0000210335 MCI WORLDCOM Network Services, Inc.DALLAS 08/24/2000 18807.50000 32-49-50.5 N NY NE 074-00-11.8 W 0000210341 BACKLINK LLC New York 08/24/2000 19680.00000 40-43-04.8 N MA NE 071-04-26.6 W 0000210361 Teligent License Company II, L.L.C. Boston 08/24/2000 17960.00000 42-21-01.3 N MA NE 071-03-53.6 W 0000210367 Teligent License Company II, L.L.C. BOSTON 08/24/2000 17840.00000 42-20-33.8 N MA NE 071-03-37.3 W 0000210500 BACKLINK LLC Charlestown 08/24/2000 19640.00000 42-22-56.4 N MA NE 070-56-38.3 W 0000210510 BACKLINK LLC Lynn 08/24/2000 19560.00000 42-28-02.2 N MA NE 070-56-38.3 W 0000210510 BACKLINK LLC Lynn 08/24/2000 19680.00000 42-28-02.2 N MA NE 070-56-58.2 W 0000210511 BACKLINK LLC Lynn
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/pnwl0228.pdf
                        • of Tennessee IncorporatedFLINTVILLE 08/28/2000 35-05-42.3 N TN RM KNKN742 086-25-34.0 W 0000211173 GTE Mobilnet of Tennessee IncorporatedFOSTERVILLE 08/28/2000 35-37-13.3 N TN RM KNKN742 086-52-45.0 W 0000211173 GTE Mobilnet of Tennessee IncorporatedFRANKEWING 08/28/2000 35-11-34.3 N TN RM KNKN742 086-45-41.0 W 0000211173 GTE Mobilnet of Tennessee IncorporatedLEWISBURG 08/28/2000 35-23-05.3 N TN RM KNKN742 086-52-57.0 W 0000211173 GTE Mobilnet of Tennessee IncorporatedLEWISBURG 08/28/2000 35-24-01.3 N TN RM KNKN742 086-21-36.5 W 0000211173 GTE Mobilnet of Tennessee IncorporatedLynchburg 08/28/2000 35-16-32.3 N TN RM KNKN742 066-36-49.0 W 0000211173 GTE Mobilnet of Tennessee IncorporatedPark City 08/28/2000 35-05-20.0 N Page 49 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City TN RM KNKN742 087-01-04.0 W 0000211173 GTE Mobilnet
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/pnwl0239.pdf
                        • 42-45-09.9 N IA RM KNKN315 095-36-14.0 W 0000216907 CELLULAR INC. NETWORK CORPORATION Cherokee 09/11/2000 42-45-26.9 N IA RM KNKN315 096-06-42.1 W 0000216907 CELLULAR INC. NETWORK CORPORATION LE MARS 09/11/2000 42-50-15.0 N IA RM KNKN315 096-12-52.0 W 0000216907 CELLULAR INC. NETWORK CORPORATION Merrill 09/11/2000 42-42-25.0 N NY RM KNKQ273 077-48-14.0 W 0000216919 NEW YORK RSA NO. 3 CELLULAR PARTNERSHIP ALFRED 09/11/2000 42-14-01.3 N NY RM KNKQ273 078-25-50.1 W 0000216919 NEW YORK RSA NO. 3 CELLULAR PARTNERSHIP Arcade 09/11/2000 42-30-12.2 N NY RM KNKQ273 079-14-18.2 W 0000216919 NEW YORK RSA NO. 3 CELLULAR PARTNERSHIP ARKWRIGHT 09/11/2000 42-24-51.2 N NY RM KNKQ273 078-17-05.0 W 0000216919 NEW YORK RSA NO. 3 CELLULAR PARTNERSHIP ATTICA 09/11/2000 42-51-48.1 N NY RM KNKQ273 077-25-59.0 W 0000216919 NEW YORK
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/pnwl0252.pdf
                        • KNKN964 084-47-12.8 W 0000226563 KENTUCKY CGSA, INC. BELLSOUTH MOBILITY INC. Danville 09/27/2000 37-38-52.3 N KY RM KNKN964 084-55-39.8 W 0000226563 KENTUCKY CGSA, INC. BELLSOUTH MOBILITY INC. Liberty 09/27/2000 37-18-37.3 N KY RM KNKN964 084-33-28.8 W 0000226563 KENTUCKY CGSA, INC. BELLSOUTH MOBILITY INC. NICHOLASVILLE 09/27/2000 37-55-48.3 N KY RM KNKN964 084-16-42.8 W 0000226563 KENTUCKY CGSA, INC. BELLSOUTH MOBILITY INC. RICHMOND 09/27/2000 37-43-01.3 N Page 54 CL - Cellular State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City KY RM KNKN964 084-19-32.8 W 0000226563 KENTUCKY CGSA, INC. BELLSOUTH MOBILITY INC. RICHMOND 09/27/2000 37-52-45.3 N KY RM KNKN964 084-19-32.8 W 0000226563 KENTUCKY CGSA, INC. BELLSOUTH MOBILITY INC. RICHMOND 09/27/2000 37-52-45.3 N KY RM KNKN964 084-41-32.8 W
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/pnwl0265.pdf
                        • - Common Carrier Fixed Point to Point Microwave State Purpose Call Sign Longitude Area Op. Receipt Date File Number Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City DE AM 075-40-29.1 W 0000218142 BACKLINK LLC NEWARK 10/13/2000 21225.00000 39-40-07.3 N DE AM 075-40-29.1 W 0000218142 BACKLINK LLC NEWARK 10/13/2000 21375.00000 39-40-07.3 N OR AM WPON434 122-39-37.9 W 0000223765 BACKLINK LLC PORTLAND 10/12/2000 17760.00000 45-31-01.3 N OR AM WPON434 122-39-37.9 W 0000223765 BACKLINK LLC PORTLAND 10/12/2000 17920.00000 45-31-01.3 N OR AM WPON434 122-39-37.9 W 0000223765 BACKLINK LLC PORTLAND 10/12/2000 18080.00000 45-31-01.3 N OR AM WPON434 122-39-37.9 W 0000223765 BACKLINK LLC PORTLAND 10/12/2000 18120.00000 45-31-01.3 N AZ AM KPV76 112-33-35.6 W 0000226042 CNG COMMUNICATIONS, INC. PERRYVILLE 10/11/2000 03730.00000 33-34-10.1 N AZ AM KPV76 112-33-35.6 W 0000226042
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/pnwl0271.pdf
                        • Frequency (MHz) Applicant Name Latitude City PA AM KGC59 075-34-15.7 W 0000209711 PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE COMMISSION Lionville 10/17/2000 06795.00000 40-04-13.3 N PA AM KGC59 075-34-15.7 W 0000209711 PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE COMMISSION Lionville 10/17/2000 06795.00000 40-04-13.3 N PA AM KGC59 075-34-15.7 W 0000209711 PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE COMMISSION Lionville 10/17/2000 06825.00000 40-04-13.3 N PA AM KGC61 075-51-59.7 W 0000209712 PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE COMMISSION Morgantown 10/17/2000 06585.00000 40-08-01.3 N PA AM KGC61 075-51-59.7 W 0000209712 PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE COMMISSION Morgantown 10/17/2000 06605.00000 40-08-01.3 N PA AM KGC61 075-51-59.7 W 0000209712 PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE COMMISSION Morgantown 10/17/2000 06635.00000 40-08-01.3 N PA AM KGC61 075-51-59.7 W 0000209712 PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE COMMISSION Morgantown 10/17/2000 06665.00000 40-08-01.3 N PA AM KGC61 075-51-59.7 W 0000209712 PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE COMMISSION Morgantown 10/17/2000 06685.00000 40-08-01.3 N PA AM KGC62
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2001/da010121.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2001/da010121.txt
                        • NOTICE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION News media information 202/418-0500 445 12th St. SW Fax-On-Demand 202/418-2830 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov DA 01-121 Released: January 18, 2001 WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU SEEKS COMMENT ON FCI 900, INC.'S EXPEDITED REQUEST FOR 3-YEAR EXTENSION OF 900 MHZ BAND CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS Comment Date: February 1, 2001 Reply Comment Date: February 8, 2001 Pursuant to Sections 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 1.925, the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (Bureau) hereby seeks comment on the Request for Expedited Waiver filed by FCI 900, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Nextel Communications, Inc. (collectively, Nextel). Nextel requests waiver of Section 90.665(c) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 90.665(c), to extend the 5-year construction period
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2001/da010122.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2001/da010122.txt
                        • media information 202/418-0500 445 12th St. SW Fax-On-Demand 202/418-2830 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov DA 01-122 Released: January 18, 2001 WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU SEEKS COMMENT ON NEOWORLD LICENSE HOLDINGS, INC.'S REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF 900 MHZ BAND CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS AND PETITION FOR DECLARATORY RULING Comment Date: February 1, 2001 Reply Comment Date: February 8, 2001 Pursuant to Sections 1.2, 1.3 and 1.925 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.2, 1.3 and 1.925, the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (Bureau) hereby seeks comment on the Request for Waiver and Petition for Declaratory Ruling filed by Neoworld License Holdings, Inc. (Neoworld), an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Neoworld License Holdings, LLC, on January 10, 2001. Neoworld requests waiver of Section 90.665(c) of the Commission's
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Reports/fcc00289.pdf
                        • percent of the total U.S. population, have three or more different operators (cellular, PCS, and/or Nextel) offering mobile telephone service in the counties in which they live. However, these counties make up only 35 percent of the total land area of the United States, reflecting the nation's uneven population distribution. On the other hand, the land area of these counties, 1.3 million square miles, is roughly equal to the combined land area of the 15 members of the European Union. Over 173 million people, or 69 percent of the U.S. population, live in areas with five or more mobile telephone operators competing to offer service. And 11 million people, or 4 percent of the population, can choose from among seven different
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
                        • 9.92 0 7.1 5.26 5.46 10 12.2 0 5.29 0 PR-4-05-2341 % Missed Appointment � Verizon � No Dispatch 0.37 0 0 0 0 1.69 0 0 0 2.04 PR-4-08-2341 % Missed Appt. � Customer � Late Order Conf. 0 0 0 0 0 PR-6 � Installation Quality PR-6-01-2341 % Install. Troubles Reported within 30 Days 1.94 2.76 1.41 2.06 1.3 1.18 1.04 0 0.61 1 PR-6-03-2341 % Install. Troubles Reported w/in 30 Days - FOK/TOK/CPE 4.07 1.66 3.72 3.09 2.44 0.59 1.46 2.67 PR-8 � Open Orders in a Hold Status PR-8-01-2341 Open Orders in a Hold Status > 30 Days 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PR-8-02-2341 Open Orders in a Hold Status > 90
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/1998/dd980930.html
                        • . Internet URL: [12]http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1998/da981967.wp CABLEVISION OF BOSTON, INC.; CABLEVISION OF FRAMINGHAM, INC.; A-R CABLE SERVICES, INC. A-R CABLE PARTNERS. Denied petition of Cablevision of Boston, Inc. et al, to become a video programming provider on the open video system operated by RCN-BECoCom, LLC, in Boston, Massachusetts and surrounding communities. Also denied Cablevision of Boston, et. al, request pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules for a waiver of Section 76.1503(c)(2)(v)(B) of the Commission's rules. Action by Chief, Cable Services Bureau. Adopted: September 28, 1998. by MO&O. (DA No. 98-1968). CSB Internet URL: [13]http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1998/da981968.wp THE DEVELOPMENT OF OPERATIONAL, TECHNICAL AND SPECTRUM REQUIREMENTS FOR MEETING FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL PUBLIC SAFETY AGENCY COMMUNICATION REQUIREMENTS THROUGH THE YEAR 2010. Established band plan and
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2000/dd000628.html
                        • LLC/CENTURYTEL OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS, LLC AND GTE ARKANSAS INCORPORATED/GTE MIDWEST INCORPORATED/GTE SOUTHWEST INCORPORATED. Granted the petition for waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by CenturyTel of Northwest Arkansas, LLC, CenturyTel of Central Arkansas, LLC, GTE Arkansas Incorporated and the petition for waiver of sections 61.41(c) and 69.3(g)(2) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. Sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 61.43. Action by Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau. Adopted: June 27, 2000. by MO&O. (DA No. 00-1434). CCB Internet URL: [20]http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001434.doc ADDENDA: The following items, released June 26, 2000, did not appear in Digest No. 121: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- GTE CORPORATION, VODAFONE AIRTOUCH PLC , AND BELL ATLANTIC CORPORATION. Granted the Applications filed by
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2007/dd070702.html
                        • by MO&O. (DA No. 07-2919). MB [35]DA-07-2919A1.doc [36]DA-07-2919A1.pdf [37]DA-07-2919A1.txt ARMSTRONG UTILITIES, INC., ET AL. Denied Petitioners' Waiver Requests, but granted Petitioners leave to amend their requests. (Dkt No. 97-80). Action by: Chief, Media Bureau. Adopted: 06/29/2007 by MO&O. (DA No. 07-2916). MB [38]DA-07-2916A1.doc [39]DA-07-2916A1.pdf [40]DA-07-2916A1.txt THE CITY OF CROSSLAKE, MINNESOTA D/B/A CROSSLAKE COMMUNICATIONS. Granted Crosslake's deferral request pursuant to Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's rules. (Dkt No. 97-80). Action by: Chief, Media Bureau. Adopted: 06/29/2007 by MO&O. (DA No. 07-2918). MB [41]DA-07-2918A1.doc [42]DA-07-2918A1.pdf [43]DA-07-2918A1.txt CONSOLIDATED REQUESTS FOR WAIVER OF SECTION 76.1204(A)(1) OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES. Granted the Waiver Requests pursuant to Sections 1.3 and 76.7 of the Commission's rules. (Dkt No. 97-80). Action by: Chief, Media Bureau. Adopted: 06/29/2007
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2008/dd080501.html
                        • testing waiver for KOGG-DT, Honolulu, Hawaii, pursuant to Section 339(a)(2)(D) of the Communications Act. (Dkt No. 05-317). Action by: Chief, Video Division, Media Bureau by LETTER. (DA No. 08-1015). MB [33]DA-08-1015A1.doc [34]DA-08-1015A1.pdf [35]DA-08-1015A1.txt MICRONESIAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. AND PTI PACIFICA, INC./REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF SECTION 54.418 OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES/DTV CONSUMER EDUCATION INITIATIVE. Granted the Petitioners a waiver pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules. (Dkt No. 96-45, 07-148). Action by: Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau. Adopted: 04/30/2008 by ORDER. (DA No. 08-1029). WCB [36]DA-08-1029A1.doc [37]DA-08-1029A1.pdf [38]DA-08-1029A1.txt References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1031A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281880A2.txt 3. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281880A1.pdf 4. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281879A2.txt 5. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281879A1.pdf 6. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281905A1.doc 7. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281905A1.pdf 8. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281905A1.txt 9. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1033A1.doc 10. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1033A1.pdf 11. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1033A1.txt 12. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1035A1.doc 13. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1035A1.pdf 14. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1035A1.txt 15. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1032A1.doc 16. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1032A1.pdf 17. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1032A1.txt
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2009/dd090421.html
                        • ON REGION 5 (SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA) 700 MHZ REGIONAL PLAN AMENDMENT. (DA No. 09-875). (Dkt No 02-378, 06-229). Comments Due: 05/11/2009. Reply Comments Due: 05/20/2009. PSHSB. Contact: Jeannie Benfaida at (202) 418-2313, email: Jeannie.Benfaida@fcc.gov [64]DA-09-875A1.doc [65]DA-09-875A1.pdf [66]DA-09-875A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- IMPROVING PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS IN THE 800 MHZ BAND. Extended for an additional forty-five days pursuant to 47 C.F.R. 1.3 waiver of the deadline by which Sprint Nextel Corporation (Sprint Nextel) is required to complete the transition of the broadcast auxiliary service (BAS) to frequencies above 2025 MHz. (Dkt No. 95-18, 00-258 , 02-55). Action by: the Commission. Adopted: 04/19/2009 by ORDER. (FCC No. 09-35). OET [67]FCC-09-35A1.doc [68]FCC-09-35A1.pdf [69]FCC-09-35A1.txt References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290260A1.doc 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290260A1.pdf 3. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290260A1.txt 4. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-864A1.doc 5. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-864A1.pdf
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/DiversityFAC/041004/T-MobilePetitionComments.pdf
                        • five-year benchmark by the FCC, the spectrum should no longer be considered restricted, as NextWave itself could have assigned these authorizations to any entity without the imposition of unjust enrichment payments.40 These unique facts make the application of the current eligibility rule to these licenses especially inappropriate, inconsistent with Commission policy, and contrary to the public interest. Pursuant to Section 1.3 of its rules, the Commission may waive any of its rules for good cause.41 More specifically, the Commission "may grant a request for waiver if it is shown that: 40 Indeed, the Commission has already shown a willingness to waive such provisions and grant restricted licenses to non-DEs when it approved the sale of such licenses to Cingular from NextWave.
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/DiversityFAC/041004/transcript100404.doc http://www.fcc.gov/DiversityFAC/041004/transcript100404.pdf
                        • possible by relaxing engineering and operational regulations that may disproportionately inhibit the development of new and small entrepreneurs which would particularly include minority broadcasters and entrepreneurs. The white paper contains some fairly detailed statistics on the dilemma facing minority broadcasters, most significantly that while 4.2 percent of the broadcast stations, the radio stations, are owned by minorities, they just constitute 1.3 percent of the asset value because minorities tend to have gotten in later. And consequently tend not to own the most powerful and most valuable facilities. In fact, only 3.2 percent of FM stations are minority owned as of 2001 and of those, 40 percent are the lower-powered Class A facilities. So these recommendations actually are the process of a
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Abernathy/Statements/2002/stkqa204.html http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Abernathy/Statements/2002/stkqa204.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Abernathy/Statements/2002/stkqa204.txt
                        • will allow the public safety community to utilize the latest technological tools - through real time video displays, Internet access, and other capabilities - in respond to emergency situations. International Considerations: As we prepare for the 2003 World Radiocommunication Conference in Caracas, the U.S. is examining the value of a possible global allocation for public protection use. WRC Agenda Item 1.3 is actually the topic of an ITU Working Group meeting in Rome as we speak. Going forward, it is important that any international allocation decision grant respective administrations significant flexibility, while also identifying multiple possible bands for such use. In this regard, the United States must be vigilant that the international decisions reached include bands identified domestically - such as
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/2000/spwek006.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/2000/spwek006.html http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/2000/spwek006.txt
                        • happening today in New York is not unlike what happened here in 1894 when the first telephone patents expired, and independent carriers rushed into the marketplace. They drove down prices, spurred innovations, and made phone service accessible to average residents-no longer simply a perk enjoyed by businesses. The numbers tell part of the story. Today, competitive local carriers serve over 1.3 million business and residential phone lines. Over 55% of those lines are delivered over the competitors' own facilities. Competitors have deployed nearly 6,000 network fiber miles and 47 local switches in New York. Nearly 40 local competitors hold numbering codes. They also have access to more than 10 million local phone numbers in New York. The competitive future in local
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/Statements/2000/stwek007.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/Statements/2000/stwek007.html http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/Statements/2000/stwek007.txt
                        • very day. Finally, partly because of the downward pressure we have brought to bear on international settlement rates, international call rates dropped 25% from 1996 to 1998. New York State For a look at the future of the 1996 Act, look at New York State. That is where the Act is working now. Competitive local carriers there already serve over 1.3 million business and residential telephone lines, and over 55% of those lines are delivered over the competitors' own facilities. Worldcom alone has over 200,000 local unbundled lines. AT&T was scheduled to add 30,000 unbundled lines last month (December), for an estimated total of 80,000 unbundled lines. Incumbents I also want to tip my hat to the Bell Companies. For all
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/Statements/stwek972.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/Statements/stwek972.html http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/Statements/stwek972.txt
                        • large measure to their exceptional skills. Much credit here also goes to the New York State Public Service Commission in pioneering work on the requirements and indices of local competition. And to the Department of Justice for their tireless vigilance and their expert insight. The progress of local competition in New York is impressive. Competitive local carriers already serve over 1.3 million business and residential telephone lines, and over 55% of those lines are delivered over the competitors' own facilities. The states are becoming the laboratories for innovation in local competition, and we look forward to many paths toward this end. Third, the road to this moment has not been easy. Shifting a $100 billion market even a few degrees is
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/spwek807.html http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/spwek807.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/spwek807.wp
                        • express your concerns to the Commission. And we want to meet those concerns. So far, I've talked about access. Access to the Commission. Access to the rulemaking process. And access to telecommunications. Now I want to talk about education and training. There is simply no industry in America with the opportunity for well-paying jobs like telecommunications. None. The U.S. needs 1.3 million new workers in information technology by 2006. The hi-tech industry was the single largest industry in the United States in 1996. People with disabilities can and should fill many of those jobs. After all, is there any doubt -- any at all -- that they can compete, and are even pace-setters, in the world of science and technology? Whether
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/spwek809.html http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/spwek809.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/spwek809.wp
                        • the home -- four out of every ten homes have a personal computer. You see it on the street when every second person walking down Michigan Avenue in this city seems to have a cell phone the size of a wallet pressed to his ear. Telecommunications is now 14% of the economy -- and growing. The United States will need 1.3 million new workers in information technology over the next eight years. We're going to need 95,000 new computer scientists, analysts and programmers each year. Revolutionary change in our economic life. Revolutionary change in our social life. I often say that the Information Highway can bring us together as a Nation, or it can divide us. It's not unlike the conventional
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/spwek815.html http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/spwek815.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/spwek815.wp
                        • 10 homes have a PC. You see it on the street when every second person walking down the street seems to have a cell phone the size of a wallet pressed to the ear. Skilled labor today requires the ability to use computers and telecommunications. Telecommunications is now 14% of the economy -- and growing. The United States will need 1.3 million new workers in information technology over the next eight years. We're going to need 95,000 new computer scientists, analysts and programmers each year. How do we make sure the Information Highway has on-ramps and off-ramps into every neighborhood? How do we avoid creating a country of information haves and have-nots? How do we make sure this revolution in communications
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/spwek816.html http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/spwek816.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/spwek816.wp
                        • University writing course to students in Israel and Kenya, you're not just watching a revolution. You're in it. Four in 10 American families have a personal computer in their homes. More Americans make semiconductors than work in construction. By the year 2000, 46 million Americans will be buying products on line. What about jobs? Well, the United States will need 1.3 million new workers in information technology occupations by 2006. Well over 100,000 a year. That's like graduating a class like yours every day, seven days a week for ten years, just to keep up. Tremendous opportunity -- for those prepared to seize it. Your generation will benefit from information technology more than any other generation in history. Newsweek wrote about
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/spwek818.html http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/spwek818.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/spwek818.wp
                        • their time and dedication to the work of the Committee. I have learned a lot from you and from Kevin McCarty, your Washington representative. Why do we need to work together? Because, make no mistake about it, telecommunications policy is about jobs and education for your cities. Let's talk about jobs. By the year 2006, the United States will need 1.3 million new workers in Information Technology core occupations of the Information Technology sector. Well over 100,000 a year. We must have an educational system that produces skilled workers to meet that demand. You know, when I meet with the CEOs who run high tech businesses, telecommunications policy is not the top issue on their agenda. It's education. They know that
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/spwek824.html http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/spwek824.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/spwek824.wp
                        • a new infrastructure being built that offers new hope. It is an information infrastructure of digital communications and computers, carried by wire, cable, satellite, and microwaves -- and it is recasting our world. Telecommunications represents 14% of our gross national product. Eight out of every ten new jobs are in information-intensive sectors of the economy. The United States will need 1.3 million new workers in information technology over the next eight years. We're going to need 95,000 new computer scientists, analysts, and programmers each year. Some say we should import these skills from outside the country. I say let's train the people who are already here. And these statistics don't even begin to tell the story of how communications and computers
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/spwek835.html http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/spwek835.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/spwek835.wp
                        • in a brave new world that will be characterized increasingly by new broadband media services: wireless, cable, DBS, and the Internet. Advances in technology are fundamentally changing the way we live. By the year 2,000 over 60 percent of all jobs in the United States will require computer knowledge and experience. In the next eight years, the U.S. will need 1.3 million new workers in information technology, and 95,000 new computer scientists, analysts and programmers, each year. These changes signal enormous opportunities. Americans with technical skills, regardless of race or income, will have the necessary tools to succeed and compete in an information age economy. As technology takes quantum leaps forward, African Americans and people of color cannot afford to be
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Powell/Statements/2002/stmkp211.html http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Powell/Statements/2002/stmkp211.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Powell/Statements/2002/stmkp211.txt
                        • calculations here. [30][10] Significantly the sum total of the entire range of EPFDs across all 32 markets and all three satellites is less than 8 dB. We note that DBS providers would have the right to petition for special relief from our rules even if we chose not to adopt a specific safety valve procedure. See, e.g., 47 CFR 1.2, 1.3. [31][11] Similarly the dissent criticizes the model for failing to weight the rainfall data based on the population. For example by weighting Los Angeles at four times the weight given to Denver based on population. Yet if such weighting were to occur it would only further diminish the weight given to the rural areas that the dissent later argues need
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Tristani/Statements/2001/stgt124.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Tristani/Statements/2001/stgt124.html http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Tristani/Statements/2001/stgt124.txt
                        • relevant geographic scope of relevant markets, see United States v. Philadelphia Nat'l Bank, 374 U.S. 321, 359 (1963) (defining relevant geographic market as an area in which a buyer may purchase a product or service from alternative sources, or in which the presence of other sellers restrains prices charged to buyers). See Merger Guidelines, 57 Fed. Reg. at 41556-41557 � 1.3. See, e.g. Philadelphia Nat'l Bank, 374 U.S. at 363 (``[A] significant increase in the concentration . . . must be enjoined in the absence of evidence clearly showing that the merger is not likely to have such anticompetitive effects.''). See also Merger Guidelines at 41558 �� 2.1, 2.2; New York v. Kraft General Foods, 926 F. Supp. 321, 359 (S.D.N.Y.
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/misc/statements/bafranca.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/misc/statements/bafranca.html http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/misc/statements/bafranca.txt
                        • receivers could potentially experience degradation from interference is small, generally 1 km or less. This interference analysis is shown in the following table: LPFM Potential Interference Radius Based on NAB Tests Receiver Category Desired Signal Level -45 dBm (Close to Station) -55 dBm (~Principle Community) -65 dBm (~Protected Service) Clock 0.3 km (0.2 mi.) 0.7 km (0.4 mi.) 2.1 km (1.3 mi.) Portable 1.0 km (0.6 mi.) 0.9 km (0.6 mi.) 1.0 km (0.6 mi.) Personal 0.4 km (0.3 mi.) 0.5 km (0.3 mi.) 0.5 km (0.3 mi.) The above Table shows the approximate radius around an LPFM station where interference could potentially occur to a 3rd adjacent channel full service station with different types of radios, based on the NAB
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/bureaus/pshs/docs/maine_comop.pdf
                        • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit i Submitted by State Office of Information Technology and Maine Emergency Management Agency VERSION 3.1 March 19, 2007 STATE OF MAINE Concept of Operations Plan (CONOPS) FOR INCIDENT COMMUNICATIONS INTEROPERABILITY ii TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 SECTION 1 � GENERAL 1 1.1. Purpose 1 1.2. Background 1 1.3. Definitions 2 1.4. Assumptions 3 SECTION 2 � OPERATIONS 3 2.1. Employment 3 2.2. Implementation 4 SECTION 3 � TRAINING 4 3.1. General 4 3.2. Training Requirements 4 3.3. Training Support 4 4 SECTION 4 � Use of the Six CONOPS Frequencies 4 SECTION 5 � SUMMARY 6 1 INTRODUCTION Two-way radio voice communications are critical to the effective management
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/dro/comments/99339/5507117144.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/dro/comments/99339/5507117144.txt
                        • 8:WPM4l:OOPM MTWTFSS 8:00PM-1l:OOPM MTWTFSS B:WPM-1l:WPM MTWTFSS &WPM-1l:WPM MTWTFSS 8:WPM.1l:OOPM MTWTFSS I:WPM-1l:WPM MTWTFSS 8:00PM-1l:OOPM MTWTF8.S &OOPM-1l:OOPM MTWTFSS 8:WPM-11 :OOPH MTWTFSS8:WPM-1l:WPM MTWTFSS .SzWPM-1l:OOPM MTWTFSS 8:OOPM.11 :WPM MTWTFSS &OOPM-1 1 :OOPM For explanatiin of symbols, see Boilerplate. Copyright 2000 Nielsen Media Research 1607 1511 1348 1303 1221 1077 944 933 658 607 546 541 540 503 458 419 356 329 295 1.6 1.5 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.1 0.9 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 04 0.4 03 0.3 2.7 2.6 2.2 2.2 2.2 2 1.9 1.5 1.5 1.2 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.5 56.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 50.7 56.7 56.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 NielsenN National People Meter
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/dro/csd_letter.html
                        • March 10, 2009 (CG Docket No. 03-123). 2 Letter from William Banks, General Counsel, CSDVRS, to Thomas Chandler, Chief, Disability Rights Office dated June 24, 2009 (CG Docket No. 03-123). 3 This percentage is based on data we received from the Fund administrator. 4 47 C.F.R. 64.604(c)(5)(iii)(E). Generally, the Commission's rules may be waived for good cause shown. 47 C.F.R. 1.3. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular); see also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969). We find that CSDVRS's explanation for not complying with this
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/dro/trs_history_docket.html
                        • and being denied compensation from the TRS Fund. In light of these impending deadlines for initial and recertification applications, and to avoid waste, fraud, and abuse in the VRS program, the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau finds that good cause exists in this instance to alter the comment periods specified in Section 1.429 of the Commission's rules. See 47 C.F.R. 1.3 (providing for suspension, amendment, or waiver of Commission rules, in whole or in part, for good cause shown, and on the Commission's own motion). Accordingly, oppositions to Sorenson's and/or AT&T's petitions for reconsideration of the Second Report and Order shall be filed no later than October 7, 2011, and replies to oppositions will be due no later October 12, 2011.
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/dro/vc_notic.doc
                        • telephone does not meet some of the technical requirements of this section. A request for waiver of one or more requirements of Part 68 does not excuse an applicant from meeting the requirements for which the applicant did not request waiver. The Commission will not waive any provision of its rules unless good cause is shown, see 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. Under the relevant case law, the applicant has the burden of showing good cause for a waiver: "[a]n applicant [for a waiver] faces a high hurdle even at the starting gate." WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969). Nevertheless, an agency must take a "hard look" at applications for waiver, id., and must consider all relevant
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-250390A1.html
                        • the Commission's San Diego Office attempted to conduct a routine inspection of FM Station KRIT in Parker, Arizona. The field agent discovered that there was neither a studio address nor telephone listing for KRIT. A contact person for KRIT was ultimately found through inquires with other broadcasters in the area and an inspection was scheduled at the KRIT transmitter site. 1.3. On February 12, 2004, the field agent met with an engineer for KRIT. The engineer advised the field agent that the transmitter site had served as KRIT's studio since the station began operations on December 15, 2002. The field agent observed that the transmitter site was located on a dirt road off a main street, was surrounded by a locked
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-256120A1.html
                        • General Partner told the agent that KWYS was run remotely from Idaho Falls and that an advertising agent in West Yellowstone went to the studio infrequently to work on ads. He also advised the agent that he or KWYS's contract engineer could arrive at the station in three to four hours to complete the inspection, but no sooner. III. DISCUSSION 1.3. Section 503(b) of the Act provides that any person who willfully or repeatedly fails to comply substantially with the terms and conditions of any license, or willfully or repeatedly fails to comply with any of the provisions of the Act or of any rule, regulation or order issued by the Commission thereunder, shall be liable for a forfeiture penalty. The
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-256485A1.html
                        • of any RMTs being received or transmitted. The printouts that were available indicated that the LP-2 station was not being monitored and that no RWT from the LP-1 station was received during this period of time. No log entries existed in any station log identifying the cause of any equipment failures or any actions taken to remedy any equipment failures. 1.3. On October 25, 2004, the FCC's San Diego office sent a letter of inquiry (``LOI'') to Lazer concerning the operation and condition of the KXRS EAS equipment and questioned the station's recordkeeping of outages and repairs.3 In its response to the LOI, Lazer admitted that the power supply of their EAS equipment failed in the ``fall of 2003 rendering the
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-260117A1.html
                        • these tests were retransmitted. EAS logs also indicated that numerous RWTs were not transmitted by KCEC-FM and numerous RWTs were not received from either designated LP-1 or LP-2 stations during this same period. No entries were made by KCEC-FM staff in the EAS log to identify the causes of these failures or what steps were taken to remedy any failures. 1.3. On April 22, 2005, the San Diego agent spoke with the KCEC-FM's Chief Engineer. The Chief Engineer acknowledged that problems were found with the EAS equipment during the engineer's inspection of the station's EAS equipment on April 9, 2005. Specifically, he indicated that the EAS equipment was originally set for the automatic mode to receive and to forward the information
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-262295A1.html
                        • according to Mr. Peterson. The San Diego agent observed that KBSZ(AM) maintained no EAS logs and had no way to monitor any EAS alerts at its station. The agent then contacted KSWG(FM) by telephone and requested that KSWG(FM) conduct an EAS weekly test. The agent monitored station KBSZ(AM) and noted that the EAS test signal from KSWG(FM) was being relayed. 1.3. On August 18, 2005, the San Diego agent contacted the KSWG(FM) general manager. The general manager told the agent that KSWG(FM) did not have any agreement with KBSZ(AM) to continue sharing EAS equipment since KBSZ(AM) was sold to the Petersons in 2001. The general manager also told the agent that he was not aware that KSWG(FM) continued to share its
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-263779A1.html
                        • KPAL-LP's EAS equipment. The inspection revealed that KPAL-LP's EAS equipment was not operational. Specifically, the agent found that the EAS equipment was not connected to the station transmitter, that the EAS equipment was programmed to monitor only one local primary (``LP-1'') source, and that the station had not received or transmitted a required monthly test (``RMT'') for over 18 months. 1.3. On November 2, 2005, the Los Angeles Office arranged for the LP-1 to transmit a required weekly test (``RWT''). The test revealed that KPAL-LP's EAS equipment failed to receive the RWT. 1.4. On November 3, 2005, the Los Angeles Office received a fax from KPAL stating that the EAS equipment at KPAL- LP had been installed and was now receiving
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-272117A1.html
                        • unauthorized locations: 1. Hydropneumatic Pump Station 3.1 located at 37DEG 56' 10" north, 121DEG 44' 50" west; 2. Hydropneumatic Pump Station 3.3 located at 37DEG 53' 55.3" north, 121DEG 44' 13.7" west; 3. Booster Pump Station 2.3 located at 37DEG 54' 23.8" north, 121DEG 43' 25.6" west; 4. Hydropneumatic Pump Station 2.2 located at 37DEG 57' 27.8" north, 121DEG 45' 1.3" west. v. Control Unit operating on 452.400 MHz operating at the unauthorized location of 37DEG 57' 36" north, 121DEG 41' 18" west. c. 47 C.F.R. S 2.105(c)(2): "Stations of a secondary service shall not cause harmful interference to stations of primary services . . ." At the time of the inspections, the City's operation of WQCY221, WQCY224, and WQCY226 continued
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-275917A1.html
                        • 461.225 MHz in Newfoundland, Pennsylvania, not Carbondale. Furthermore, the agent found that Conway is operating station WPNT858 on the antenna structure 1025402 in Carbondale, Pennsylvania at the wrong coordinates. Conway is operating station WPNT858 from the coordinates 41-32-41.2 N Latitude 075-27-39.3 W Longitude. The license for station WPNT858 specifies that Conway must operate its station in Carbondale at the coordinates 41-33-01.3 N Latitude 075-27-26.7 W Longitude. b. 47 C.F.R. S: 90.425(a) "Stations licensed under this part . . . shall be identified by the transmission of the assigned call sign during each transmission or exchange of transmissions, or once each 15 minutes . . . during periods of continuous operation." Between 1:45 p.m. and 2:30 p.m. on July 18, 2007, the
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-287610A1.html
                        • of the antenna tower. The agent then employed a spatial averaging measurement technique, using a calibrated RFR meter and probe, where measurements in four quadrants are averaged to give a representative reading for each location. In the first area of concern, the agent determined that the RFR levels exceeded the public MPE limits, with a RFR power density measurement of 1.3 mW/cm2 (650% of the public MPE limits). In the second area of concern, the agent determined that RFR levels exceeded the public MPE limits, with a RFR power density measurement of 0.72 mW/cm2 (360% of the public MPE limits). The Portland agent observed no warning signs at or around either area of concern alerting the public to the excessive RFR
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da012158.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da012158.html
                        • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of AT&T Corp. to Extend Time in Which to Convert Informal Complaints to Formal Complaints and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da012159.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da012159.html
                        • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of Sprint IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section 1.718 of our rules, 47
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da012428.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da012428.pdf
                        • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of AT&T Corp. to Extend Time in Which to Convert Informal Complaints to Formal Complaints and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da012551.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da012551.pdf
                        • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of AT&T Corp. to Extend Time in Which to Convert Informal Complaints to Formal Complaints and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01173.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01173.html
                        • segment. January 16, 2001 Letter at Attachment B, Attachment 1 at � 2.1; Answer at 3, � 5; COMSAT Brief at 4; IDB Supplemental Brief at 4. See January 16, 2001 Letter at Exhibit A. Id. at Exhibit A, � 1.8. Id. at Exhibit A, Annex A, � 1.1. Id. at Exhibit A, � 2.3. Id. at Exhibit A, � 1.3. See February 2, 2001 Letter at 1. COMSAT Brief at 4, 7, 9; IDB Mobile Communications, Inc. v. COMSAT Corporation, IDB Mobile Communications, Inc. Final Reply, File No. E-97-48 (filed Mar. 9, 1998) at 10-11 (``IDB Reply''). IDB Mobile Communications, Inc. v. COMSAT Corporation, Reply Brief of COMSAT Corporation, File No. E-97-48 (filed Mar. 9, 1998) at 3 (``COMSAT Reply'');
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-104A1.html
                        • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 6. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Petition for Additional Extension of Time filed by Indiana Paging Network, Inc. IS GRANTED. 7. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-1065A1.html
                        • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of AT&T Corp. Requesting Additional Extension of Time in Which to Convert Informal Complaint Against CTC Telcom to Formal Complaint and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-1072A1.html
                        • Informal Complaint.21 Indiana Paging indicates that it has settled its dispute with the final remaining defendant, Verizon. Thus, Indiana Paging requests that the Commission dismiss its informal complaint and terminate this proceeding. 10. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Partial Withdrawal and Request for Dismissal of Informal Complaint filed by Indiana Paging Network, Inc. IS GRANTED and this proceeding IS TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Radhika V. Karmarkar Deputy Chief, Market
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-1890A1.html
                        • deadline for the conversion of these EUCL informal complaints into formal complaints. 7 Because this extension will facilitate the possible settlement of these numerous claims, we are satisfied that our action today serves the public interest. 3. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), 208, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, and the authority delegated by sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.011 and 0.311, that section 1.718(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.718(a), IS HEREBY WAIVED, with regard to the IPP EUCL informal complaints described herein and the deadline for the conversion and filing of these informal complaints
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-2070A1.html
                        • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that CTC Communications, Inc.'s Consent Motion For Extension of Time To File Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-210A1.html
                        • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of AT&T Corp. to Extend Time in Which to Convert Informal Complaints to Formal Complaints and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-2204A1.html
                        • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of Complainants For Extension of Time In Which To Convert Informal Complaints To Formal Complaint and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-2340A1.html
                        • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of Complainants For Extension of Time In Which To Convert Informal Complaints To Formal Complaint and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-2511A1.html
                        • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 5. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Waiver of Commission Rule 1.718(a) IS GRANTED. 6. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section 1.718 of our
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-2552A1.html
                        • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of Complainants For Extension of Time In Which To Convert Informal Complaints To Formal Complaint and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-259A1.html
                        • deadline for the conversion of these EUCL informal complaints into formal complaints. 8 Because this extension will facilitate the possible settlement of these numerous claims, we are satisfied that our action today serves the public interest. 4. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), 208, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, and the authority delegated by sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.011 and 0.311, that section 1.718(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.718(a), IS HEREBY WAIVED, with regard to the IPP EUCL informal complaints described herein and the deadline for the conversion and filing of these informal complaints
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-2758A1.html
                        • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Fourth Consent Motion of Complainants For Extension of Time In Which To Convert Informal Complaints To Formal Complaint and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-3013A1.html
                        • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Fifth Consent Motion of Complainants For Extension of Time In Which To Convert Informal Complaints To Formal Complaint and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-3182A1.html
                        • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Sixth Consent Motion of Complainants For Extension of Time In Which To Convert Informal Complaints To Formal Complaint and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-323A1.html
                        • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Partial Withdrawal of Informal Complaint and Petition for Additional Extension of Time filed by Indiana Paging Network, Inc. IS GRANTED. 8. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order,
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-3305A1.html
                        • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Seventh Consent Motion of Complainants For Extension of Time In Which To Convert Informal Complaints To Formal Complaint and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-3342A1.html
                        • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-3343A1.html
                        • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-3344A1.html
                        • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-3345A1.html
                        • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-3346A1.html
                        • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-3401A1.html
                        • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-3414A1.html
                        • of complaint proceedings, and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3, 1.716-18, and 1.720- 1.736 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.716-18, 1.720-36, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Joint Motion to Convert Case IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-3467A1.html
                        • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Eighth Consent Motion of Complainants For Extension of Time In Which To Convert Informal Complaints To Formal Complaint and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-3492A1.html
                        • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of Complainant For Extension of Time In Which To Convert Informal Complaint To Formal Complaint and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-35A1.html
                        • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of AT&T Corp. to Extend Time in Which to Convert Informal Complaints to Formal Complaints and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-360A1.html
                        • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of AT&T Corp. to Extend Time in Which to Convert Informal Complaints to Formal Complaints and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the informal complaints
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-450A1.html
                        • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of AT&T Corp. to Extend Time in Which to Convert Other Informal Complaints to Formal Complaints and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-597A1.html
                        • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of AT&T Corp. Requesting An Additional Extension of Time in Which to Convert Other Informal Complaints to Formal Complaints and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-707A1.html
                        • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 8. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Partial Withdrawal of Informal Complaint and Petition for Additional Extension of Time filed by Indiana Paging Network, Inc. IS GRANTED. 9. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order,
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-721A1.html
                        • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of AT&T Corp. Resolving Certain Informal Complaints and Requesting An Additional Extension of Time in Which to Convert Other Informal Complaints to Formal Complaints and Toll Limitations Period IS
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-822A1.html
                        • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of AT&T Corp. Resolving Certain Informal Complaints and Requesting An Additional Extension of Time in Which to Convert Informal Complaint Against CTC Telcom to Formal Complaint and Toll Limitations
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-930A1.html
                        • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 9. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Partial Withdrawal of Informal Complaint and the Petition for Additional Extension of Time filed by Indiana Paging Network, Inc. ARE GRANTED. 10. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-960A1.html
                        • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of AT&T Corp. Requesting Additional Extension of Time in Which to Convert Informal Complaint Against CTC Telcom to Formal Complaint and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-314A1.html
                        • EUCL charges were imposed. 49. Second, Complainants assert that, irrespective of the accrual date of their causes of action, the statute of limitations should be tolled on equitable and administrative grounds, based on the filing of a petition for declaratory ruling by a payphone trade association (APCC) and the voluminous number of informal complaints. Complainants seek a waiver, under Section 1.3 of our Rules, of the application of Section 415(b) of the Act, which provides a party with two years from the date the cause of action accrues to file a complaint.142 Based on Commission and court precedent, as well as the facts of this case, as discussed below, we decline to extend the recovery period for which Complainants may collect
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-1083A1.html
                        • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of MCI WORLDCOM Network Services, Inc. Requesting Waiver of Section 1.718 of the Commission's Rules and Further Extension of Time In Which to Convert Its Informal Complaint to a
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-1132A1.html
                        • circumstances of this proceeding require that any additional pleadings, other than those described herein, must be served and filed prior to the initial status conference. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. 1.726 (replies), 1.729 (discovery). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), 208, and 255 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), 208, 255, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Unopposed Motion of Complainant for Limited Modification of the Procedural Schedule IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Colleen K. Heitkamp Chief, Telecommunications Consumers Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 1 See O'Day v. Audiovox Communications Corporation and
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-1134A1.html
                        • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-1174A1.html
                        • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of MCI WORLDCOM Network Services, Inc. Requesting Waiver of Section 1.718 of the Commission's Rules and Further Extension of Time In Which to Convert Its Informal Complaint to a
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-1187A1.html
                        • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-1261A1.html
                        • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties, and of this Commission, until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-160A1.html
                        • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-170A1.html
                        • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of Complainants For Extension of Time In Which To Convert Informal Complaints To Formal Complaint and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i),
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-1723A1.html
                        • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-1740A1.html
                        • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-1750A1.html
                        • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-1751A1.html
                        • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties, and of this Commission, until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-1811A1.html
                        • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-1900A1.html
                        • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 5. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that Notesan's Request for Waiver of Commission Rule 1.718(a) IS GRANTED. 6. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadline that would otherwise apply under section 1.718 of the
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-1975A1.html
                        • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-1976A1.html
                        • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-2000A1.html
                        • Because this extension will facilitate the possible settlement of these numerous claims and allow the parties to await the Court's review of the Liability Order, we are satisfied that our action today serves the public interest. 3. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), 208, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, and the authority delegated by sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111 and 0.311, that section 1.718(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.718(a), IS HEREBY WAIVED, with regard to the IPP EUCL informal complaints described herein and the deadline for the conversion and filing of these informal complaints
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-207A1.html
                        • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of MCI WORLDCOM Network Services, Inc. Requesting Waiver of Section 1.718 of the Commission's Rules and an Extension of Time In Which to Convert Its Informal Complaint to a
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-2110A1.html
                        • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-2180A1.html
                        • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-22A1.html
                        • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of MCI WORLDCOM Network Services, Inc. Requesting Waiver of Section 1.718 of the Commission's Rules and an Extension of Time In Which to Convert Its Informal Complaint to a
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-2377A1.html
                        • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-2378A1.html
                        • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-2617A1.html
                        • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-2618A1.html
                        • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-2736A1.html
                        • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-2880A1.html
                        • of disputes, and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-2881A1.html
                        • of disputes, and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-3022A1.html
                        • and Commission staff on Tuesday, October 14, 2003 at 11:00. Counsel for Complainants will establish a telephone bridge for this call, and inform the Defendant and Commission staff of the call-in information. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-3222A1.html
                        • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-3223A1.html
                        • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-351A1.html
                        • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that Notesan's Request for Waiver of Commission Rule 1.718(a) IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section 1.718 of the
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-358A1.html
                        • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Third Consent Motion of Complainant For Extension of Time In Which To Convert Informal Complaint To Formal Complaint and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-3595A1.html
                        • with sufficient time to devote their resources to reaching a settlement within the time estimated by the parties, yet establishes a reasonable deadline in the event that such an agreement proves unobtainable. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-371A1.html
                        • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of MCI WORLDCOM Network Services, Inc. Requesting Waiver of Section 1.718 of the Commission's Rules and an Extension of Time In Which to Convert Its Informal Complaint to a
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-3849A1.html
                        • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-3850A1.html
                        • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-406A1.html
                        • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-4092A1.html
                        • addition, the public interest will be served by affording KIS sufficient time to construct a formal complaint that complies with the Commission's rigorous rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.720-1.736, should such a complaint be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the requests for extension ARE GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-4110A1.html
                        • report on or before February 20, 2004. This report shall be addressed to: Suzanne Perrin Room CY-B526 Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau Federal Communication Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 5. This order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Radhika V. Karmarkar Deputy Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 1 47 C.F.R. 1.718. 2 See Letter from Warren Firschein, Attorney, Market Disputes Resolution Division, Enforcement Bureau, FCC,
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-449A1.html
                        • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that Qwest Corporation's request for waiver of Rule 1.718 and for extension of time IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934,
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-478A1.html
                        • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of MCI WORLDCOM Network Services, Inc. Requesting Waiver of Section 1.718 of the Commission's Rules and Further Extension of Time In Which to Convert Its Informal Complaint to a
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-569A1.html
                        • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Fourth Consent Motion of Complainant For Extension of Time In Which To Convert Informal Complaint To Formal Complaint and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-607A1.html
                        • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-67A1.html
                        • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that Qwest Corporation's Request for waiver of Rule 1.718 and for Extension of Time IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934,
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-75A1.html
                        • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-767A1.html
                        • circumstances of this proceeding require that any additional pleadings, other than those described herein, must be served and filed prior to the initial status conference. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. 1.726 (replies), 1.729 (discovery). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), 208, and 255 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), 208, 255, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Unopposed Motion of Defendants to Modify Procedural Schedule IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Colleen K. Heitkamp Chief, Telecommunications Consumers Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 1 See O'Day v. Audiovox Communications Corporation and Verizon Wireless, Notice
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-76A1.html
                        • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-77A1.html
                        • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-787A1.html
                        • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of MCI WORLDCOM Network Services, Inc. Requesting Waiver of Section 1.718 of the Commission's Rules and Further Extension of Time In Which to Convert Its Informal Complaint to a
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-78A1.html
                        • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-827A1.html
                        • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Fifth Consent Motion of Complainant For Extension of Time In Which To Convert Informal Complaint To Formal Complaint and Toll Limitations Period IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-836A1.html
                        • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of MCI WORLDCOM Network Services, Inc. Requesting Waiver of Section 1.718 of the Commission's Rules and Further Extension of Time In Which to Convert Its Informal Complaint to a
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-861A1.html
                        • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-875A1.html
                        • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-1043A1.html
                        • the public interest by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 3. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 4. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section 1.718 of our rules, 47
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-1099A1.html
                        • report on or before June 18, 2004. This report shall be addressed to: Suzanne Perrin Room CY-B526 Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau Federal Communication Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 5. This order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Radhika V. Karmarkar Deputy Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 1 47 C.F.R. 1.718. 2 See Judware v. Verizon, Order, DA 04-577, 2004 WL 369089 (F.C.C.) (February 27,
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-1450A1.html
                        • informal complaints into formal complaints.10 Because this extension will facilitate the possible settlement of these numerous claims, particularly in light of the Court's recent opinion, we are satisfied that our action today serves the public interest. 3. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), 208, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, and the authority delegated by sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111 and 0.311, that section 1.718(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.718(a), IS HEREBY WAIVED, with regard to the IPP EUCL informal complaints described herein and the deadline for the conversion and filing of these informal complaints
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-14A1.html
                        • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-1749A1.html
                        • public interest, and will postpone the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the request for extension of time to file complainants' formal complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadlines that otherwise would apply under section 1.718 of the Commission's rules,
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-1809A1.html
                        • motion requesting such action within sixty (60) days after notice of termination or expiration of the automatic stay in Cable & Wireless' bankruptcy proceedings, rather than filing an entirely new formal complaint.12 6. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3, 1.716-18, and 1.720-1.736 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.716-18, 1.720-36, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that Qwest's and U.S. South's Joint Request for Dismissal With Prejudice as to U.S. South IS GRANTED. 7. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-1874A1.html
                        • report on or before Auguest 20, 2004. This report shall be addressed to: Suzanne Perrin Room CY-B526 Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau Federal Communication Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 5. This order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Radhika V. Karmarkar Deputy Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 1 47 C.F.R. 1.718. 2 See Judware v. Verizon, Order, DA 04-1099, 2004 WL 877367 (F.C.C.) (April 26,
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-2000A1.html
                        • public interest, and will postpone the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the request for extension of time to file complainants' formal complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadlines that otherwise would apply under section 1.718 of the Commission's rules,
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-2704A1.html
                        • James A. Dailey Director, Office of Homeland Security Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 1 47 C.F.R. 11.51(j). 2 See id. 3 Letter from Matthew H. McCormick, Counsel for Hull Broadcasting, Inc. (filed May 4, 2004). 4 Email from Matthew H. McCormick, Counsel for Hull Broadcasting, Inc. (Aug. 3, 2004) (providing supplemental information in response to Commission staff inquiry). 5 See 47 C.F.R. 1.3 (``Any provision of the rules may be waived by the Commission on its own motion or by petition if good cause therefore is shown."). See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (finding that a waiver is appropriate only if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule and such deviation will serve the
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-2837A1.html
                        • report on or before October 22, 2004. This report shall be addressed to: Suzanne Perrin Room CY-B526 Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 5. This order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Radhika V. Karmarkar Deputy Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 1 47 C.F.R. 1.718. 2 See Judware v. Verizon, Order, DA 04-1874, 2004 WL 1432325 (F.C.C.) (June 24,
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-2972A1.html
                        • settlement of this dispute and by postponing the need for litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3, 1.716- 18, and 1.720-1.736 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.716-18, 1.720-36, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request to Convert IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j),
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-3087A1.html
                        • the public interest by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 5. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.722 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.722, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that Innovative's Petition for waiver and extension of time IS GRANTED. 6. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadline for AT&T to file a supplemental complaint for damages
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-3167A1.html
                        • filing deadline for the conversion of these EUCL informal complaints into formal complaints. Because this extension will facilitate the possible settlement of these numerous claims, we are satisfied that our action today serves the public interest. 3. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), 208, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, and the authority delegated by sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111 and 0.311, that section 1.718(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.718(a), IS HEREBY WAIVED, with regard to the IPP EUCL informal complaints described herein and the deadline for the conversion and filing of these informal complaints
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-3265A1.html
                        • the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. We are not satisfied, however, that the additional safeguard requested by ACS is necessary and/or serves the public interest. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3, 1.716- 18, and 1.720-1.736 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.716-18, 1.720-36, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Joint Motion to Dismiss Claims Against ACS of Fairbanks, Inc. and ACS of Alaska, Inc.; Request to Convert Claims Against ACS of Anchorage, Inc. to Claims in an
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-3394A1.html
                        • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of MCI IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section 1.718 of our rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.718,
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-343A1.html
                        • of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section 1.718 of our rules, 47
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-3467A1.html
                        • report on or before December 17, 2004. This report shall be addressed to: Suzanne Perrin Room 4-B522 Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 5. This Order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Radhika V. Karmarkar Deputy Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 1 47 C.F.R. 1.718. 2 See Judware v. Verizon, Order, DA 04-2837, 2004 WL 1944886 (F.C.C.) (September 1,
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-3569A1.html
                        • sections 0.111, 0.311, and 1.727 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, and 1.727, Verizon's Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Defer, is GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. 29. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3, 1.716-1.718, and 1.720-1.736 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.716-1.718, and 1.720-36, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111 and 0.311, Broadview's formal complaint of December 30, 2003 SHALL BE CONVERTED into an informal complaint with a designated filing date of December 30, 2003, and that the formal complaint and
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-3871A1.html
                        • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of MCI IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section 1.718 of our rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.718,
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-3978A1.html
                        • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that Verizon's request for extension IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.718,
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-4022A1.html
                        • order, a notice of intent to convert its informal complaint into a formal complaint. Any informal complainant who does not submit such notice shall waive its right to convert its informal complaint into a formal complaint. 4. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), 208, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, and the authority delegated by sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111 and 0.311, that section 1.718(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.718(a), IS HEREBY WAIVED, with regard to the IPP EUCL informal complaints described herein and the deadline for the conversion and filing of these informal complaints
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-577A1.html
                        • report on or before April 16, 2004. This report shall be addressed to: Suzanne Perrin Room CY-B526 Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau Federal Communication Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 5. This order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Radhika V. Karmarkar Deputy Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 1 47 C.F.R. 1.718. 2 See Judware v. Verizon, Order, DA 03-4110, 2003 WL 23095472 (F.C.C.) (December 31,
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-682A1.html
                        • public interest, and will postpone the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Request for Extension of Time to File Complainants' Formal Complaint IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section 1.718 of our rules, 47
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-753A1.html
                        • the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Joint Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice the Complaint against the Remaining Defendants IS GRANTED. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3, 1.716-18, and 1.720-1.736 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.716-18, 1.720-36, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Complainants' formal complaint is converted to an informal complaint, and that the formal complaint and answer filed in the above- captioned proceeding satisfy sections 1.716-17 of the Commission's rules,
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-2819A1.html
                        • Inc., ) File No. EB-03-MD-011 Jaroth, Inc. d/b/a Pacific ) Telemanagement ) Services, and ) Intera Communications Corp., ) ) Complainants, ) ) v. ) Network IP, LLC, and ) Network Enhanced Telecom, LLP, ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER Adopted: October 26, 2005Released: October 27, 2005 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Order, pursuant to sections 1.3 and 1.727 of the Commission's rules,1 we grant in substantial part a motion2 filed by Complainants (collectively, ``APCC'') for waiver of the six-month filing deadline set forth in section 1.718 of the Commission's rules.3 For statute of limitations purposes, rule 1.718 allows the filing date of a formal complaint to ``relate back'' to the filing date of a prior informal
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-328A1.html
                        • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of MCI, Inc. IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section 1.718 of our rules, 47 C.F.R.
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-484A1.html
                        • report on or before April 15, 2005. This report shall be addressed to: Suzanne Perrin Room 4-B522 Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 5. This Order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Lisa B. Griffin, Deputy Division Chief Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 1 47 C.F.R. 1.718. 2 See Judware v. Verizon, Order, DA 05-6, 2005 WL 22880 (F.C.C.) (January
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-48A1.html
                        • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of MCI IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section 1.718 of our rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.718,
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-4A1.html
                        • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that OCI's request for extension IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.718,
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-668A1.html
                        • resolution of disputes and by postponing the need for further litigation and expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and of this Commission until such time as may actually be necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, that the Consent Motion of MCI, Inc. IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise extended by order, the deadlines that would otherwise apply under section 1.718 of our rules, 47 C.F.R.
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-674A1.html
                        • service by hand delivery and permit complainants to serve defendants by overnight mail. 24. All other rules relating to formal complaints apply in their entirety, including sections 1.725- 1.736 of the Commission's rules.31 IV. ORDERING CLAUSES 25. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), 208, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, and the authority delegated by sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111 and 0.311, that on or before April 22, 2005, informal complainants submit notice of intent to proceed as specified above. Any informal complainant that does not provide such notice waives its right to convert its informal complaint
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-6A1.html
                        • report on or before February 18, 2005. This report shall be addressed to: Suzanne Perrin Room 4-B522 Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 5. This Order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.718 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, 1.718, and the authority delegated in sections 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Lisa B. Griffin, Deputy Division Chief Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 1 47 C.F.R. 1.718. 2 See Judware v. Verizon, Order, DA 04-3467, 2004 WL 2434283 (F.C.C.) (November
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-1328A1.html
                        • be imposed or should be reduced shall include a detailed factual statement and such documentation and affidavits as may be pertinent." Section 1.80(f)(3) of the Rules. 47 C.F.R. S 1.80(f)(3). Public Notice: Low Power FM Filing Window Deadline Extended, 15 FCC Rcd 9533 (2000). 47 C.F.R. S 73.870(b). Waivers will only be granted for "good cause shown." 47 C.F.R. S 1.3. We note that 916 Radio, by continuing to operate an unlicensed station, after receiving warnings from the San Francisco Office, was not in compliance with the Commission's Rules when it filed the March 17, 2005 waiver request and application. See 47 C.F.R. S 73.854 ("No application for an LPFM station may be granted unless the applicant certifies, under penalty of
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-166A1.html
                        • this vein, we note that so-called "live" programming is not literally live - viewers at home do not see an event at the very time that it is actually occurring. Rather, there is a natural delay caused by the time that it takes a signal to reach viewers. The record shows that digital signals, for example, may take up to 1.3 to 3.3 seconds to reach viewers over-the-air. And, if viewers are receiving such signals through a cable operator or satellite provider, there may be an additional delay of up to 3 seconds. Finally, if a viewer has a digital video recorder, there is another additional delay of approximately another half-second. Thus, using a conservative estimate, a viewer may be watching
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-91A1.html
                        • that the person has committed some form of fraud related to the E-Rate program. The Second Report and Order offers only one example of such "extraordinary circumstances" -- reversal of the conviction or judgment upon which the debarment was based. 19. Those who seek to avoid debarment by requesting waiver of the rule must meet a similarly high burden. Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules governs petitions for waiver generally, and provides that a waiver may be granted upon "good cause shown." Because Commission rules are presumed valid, the petitioner bears a heavy burden. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule "only if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule and such a deviation will serve
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-2150A1.html
                        • P 19; NPTC Nov. 23, 2005 Letter. See Implementation of Section 703(e) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996; Amendment of the Commission's Rules and Policies Governing Pole Attachments, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 6777, 6788-89, P 19 (1998) (rejecting pole owners' proposal to impose a statute of limitations on pole attachment complaints) (subsequent history omitted). See 47 C.F.R. S 1.3 ("Any provision of the rules may be waived by the Commission on its own motion or on petition if good cause therefor is shown."). Reply at 19-20; Reply, Declaration of Loren Salsgiver, Chief Executive Officer of Salsgiver Telecom, at 2, PP 3, 4. See, e.g., Implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Amendment of Rules Governing Procedures to be Followed
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-06-126A1.html
                        • of time is necessary to protect the integrity of the program, and to guard against the possibility of additional waste, fraud, and abuse. Accordingly, we debar NextiraOne. 15. We also deny NextiraOne's request to waive the debarment rule in this case. Those who seek to avoid debarment by requesting waiver of the rule must meet a similarly high burden. Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules governs petitions for waiver generally, and provides that a waiver may be granted upon "good cause shown." Because Commission rules are presumed valid, the petitioner bears a heavy burden. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule "only if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule and such a deviation will serve
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-73A1.html
                        • contributions. In light of the seriousness, duration and scope of Carrera's violations, we conclude that the forfeiture proposed in the Carrera NAL and revised as set forth above to $345,900 is warranted. V. ORDERING CLAUSES 20. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 303(r) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. SS 154(i), 154(j), and 303(r), and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S 1.3, Carrera's Petition for Waiver is GRANTED. 21. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT, pursuant to section 503(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 503(b), and section 1.80 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S 1.80, Carrera IS LIABLE FOR A MONETARY FORFEITURE in the amount of $345,900 for willfully and repeatedly violating the
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1685A1.html
                        • the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau initiated an investigation into whether RangeVideo is marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices, specifically, wireless video transmitters. At the time of that letter, we observed on your website, www.rangevideo.com, your marketing of the following radio frequency devices: 1. 900MHz 100mW audio/video transmitter 2. 900MHz 500mW audio/video transmitter 3. 1.3GHz 300mW audio/video transmitter 4. 2.4GHz 200mW audio/video transmitter 5. 2.4GHz 500mW audio/video transmitter 6. 2.4GHz 1000mW audio/video transmitter 7. 2.4GHz 1000mW cased audio/video transmitter. In your response to the LOI dated June 30, 2008, you state that you do not manufacture these transmitter devices. You admit that you first imported the devices on August 2, 2006, that you continue to
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2012/DA-12-789A1.html
                        • the president of Mount Rushmore. After being informed that the Mount Rushmore president was in the area, the agent left his business card with an employee who agreed to have the president contact the agent, however, the agent never heard from the president. 4. Also on June 1, 2011, the Denver agent inspected the Station KZMX-FM transmitter facility located approximately 1.3 miles from the Stations' main studio location. The agent observed that Station KZMX-FM was operating using a 4-bay, circularly polarized FM antenna, while a 4-bay horizontal FM antenna was on the ground near the KZMX-FM tower. According to the Station KZMX-FM license, it is authorized to operate using horizontal polarization only. 5. In the morning of June 2, 2011, the
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/fcc00138.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/fcc00138.txt
                        • to investigate whether further enforcement action is warranted against Defendants for apparent knowing or repeated violations of Commission rules in relation to the facts raised in these complaint proceedings. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 201(b), 203(c), and 208 of the Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 154(j), 201(b), 203(c), 208, and sections 1.3 and 1.106 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 1.106, that the Application for Review of the Bell Atlantic Order filed by Frontier Communications Services, Inc. IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 201(b), 203(c), and 208 of the Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 154(j), 201(b), 203(c), 208, and
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/enbanc/102998/tr102998.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/enbanc/102998/tr102998.txt http://www.fcc.gov/enbanc/102998/tr102998.wp
                        • that the 7 Federal-State Joint Board took was to significantly enhance 8 the Lifeline and Link-Up Programs. 9 As a member of the USAC board, I'm happy to report 10 that as of August 1998, the last month which we have data 11 available, there were 5.1 million Lifeline participants. 12 More importantly, the first eight months of this year 1.3 13 million households took advantage of the Link-Up Program to 14 offset some of the initial connect charges for getting basic 15 service. Currently, these programs are growing at an 16 average rate of about two percent a month in terms of the 17 demand on those two different funds. 18 Jorge Schement has done extensive research work in 19
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-04-3554A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-04-3554A1.pdf
                        • properly reclassified as a Class C0 station, it will apply to upgrade KRVG(FM) to Class C1 status. See Application No. BALH-20030530BLR. Cool Radio, LLC filed a petition to deny this application (and other applications in the transaction) on July 10, 2003. The application was granted May 28, 2004 and consummated July 9, 2004. AGM and NRC cite 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 and WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969). The Class C1 KIDN-FM facility envisioned by AGM and NRC would increase the station's population coverage from 13,482 to 31,159 (2000 Census data). Puopolo objection at 3. Jacor and Citicasters cite Melody Music, 345 F.2d 730 (D.C. Cir. 1965). Streamlining of Radio Technical Rules in Parts 73 and 74
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-05-1941A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-05-1941A1.pdf
                        • U.S.C. � 307(b). Petition for Reconsideration at 5. See WWIZ, Inc., 37 FCC 685, 686 (1964), aff'd sub nom., The Lorain Journal Co. v. FCC, 351 F.2d 824 (D.C. Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 967 (1966). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.106. See WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157-59 (D.C. Cir. 1969). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (rule provisions may be waived ``for good cause shown''); 47 C.F.R. � 73.3566(a) (requests for waiver ``shall show the nature of the waiver or exception desired and shall set forth reasons in support thereof''). Rio Grande Family Radio Fellowship, Inc. v. FCC, 406 F.2d 664, 665-66 (D.C. Cir. 1968). Technical Streamlining Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 21670. Id. (emphasis added).
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-1550A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-1550A1.pdf
                        • Petition to Dismiss filed by Blakeney Communications, Inc., IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein and IS DENIED in all other respects. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that Clear Channel Broadcasting Licenses, Inc., IS ADMONISHED for its late-filed license application in violation of Section 73.3598(a) of the Commission's Rules and for its failure to have requested a waiver pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules. Finally, IT IS ORDERED, that Section 73.3598(e) of the Commission's Rules IS WAIVED to the extent indicated, and the WRKH(FM) license application (File No. BLH-20050615ACP) IS GRANTED. Sincerely, Peter H. Doyle Chief, Audio Division Media Bureau cc: Anne Goodwin Crump, Esq. Marissa G. Repp, Esq. CCBL filed an Opposition to the Petition on July 7, 2005,
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-548A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-548A1.pdf
                        • its most recent filing in this proceeding, the February Supplement, Northeast states that WLKC(FM) ``continues to be described by Arbitron as being in the [Burlington Metro]'' such that Northeast controls 6 stations in that Metro. See February Supplement at 1. January Supplement at 1. Waiver Request at 2. 418 F.2d 1153, 1157-59 (D.C. Cir. 1969)). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (stating that rule provisions may be waived "for good cause shown"). The Commission declined to adopt any specific waiver criteria relating to radio station ownership in the Ownership Order, but stated that ``[p]arties who believe that the particular facts of their case warrant a waiver of the local radio ownership rule may seek a waiver under the general `good cause'
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-644A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-644A1.pdf
                        • at 13808-09. 47 C.F.R. � 73.3555, Note 4. Application, Exhibit 5 at 6. Id. at 4. WAIT Radio v. F.C.C., 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (``WAIT Radio''). See Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v F.C.C., 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (citing WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1157-59). WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1157. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (rule may be waived ``for good cause shown'') (cited in Ownership Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 13747). 47 C.F.R. � 73.3555, Note 4 (emphasis added). Id., 18 FCC Rcd at 13810. Id., 18 FCC Rcd at 13809. See 5 U.S.C. �� 551(5), 553. See also McLouth Steel Products Corp. v. Thomas, 838 F.2d 1317 (D.C. Cir. 1988) (agency generally may
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1270A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1270A1.pdf
                        • filed by Send Technologies, L.L.C., on January 19, 2004 and March 22, 2004 ARE DENIED and the underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further processing consistent with this Order. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1- 4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154 and 254, and sections 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3, 54.722(a) and pursuant to the authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Waivers filed by Send Technologies, L.L.C. ARE DENIED and the underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further action consistent with this
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4367A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4367A1.pdf
                        • payment of $205,500 has already been deducted from the upfront payment it deposited with the Commission to participate in Auction No. 37, it owes no further payment to the Commission. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED pursuant to Sections 4(i), 303(r), and 309(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 303(r), and 309(j), and Sections 1.3 and 1.1204(g)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 1.1204(g)(1), that the Request for Waiver filed by Advance Acquisitions, Inc., on November 20, 2006, IS GRANTED, and the Amended Request for Waiver filed by Advance Acquisitions, Inc., on May 22, 2007, IS GRANTED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED pursuant to Sections 4(i), 303(r), and 309(j) of the
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4389A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4389A1.pdf
                        • Order, 5 FCC Rcd 3712 (1990) (waiver of minimum spacing rules for applicant to construct a new commercial FM station, where short-spacing was under a mile and served the public interest by avoiding potentially serious environmental problems at fully spaced sites); See also R&L Broadcasters, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 7 FCC Rcd 5551, 5552 (1992) (waiver to permit short-spacing of 1.3 miles, approximately one percent of the required spacing, in rugged mountain range where interference to short-spaced station was unlikely). See WREL, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 68 FCC2d 1043 (1978), aff'd, 45 R.R. 2d 319 (1979) (waiver of former radio contour overlap rule for overlap of 8.1 sq. miles with 185 people, with area of overlap comprising 2 percent of
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4510A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4510A1.pdf
                        • 303 (1999); 47 C.F.R � 1.80(b)(4), note to paragraph (b)(4), Section I. A broadcast station requires an authorization from the Commission to operate. See 47 U.S.C. � 301. 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(2)(D); see also Forfeiture Policy Statement, 12 FCC Rcd at 17100-01; 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(4); 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(4), note to paragraph (b)(4), Section II. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; Northeast Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (``[W]aiver is appropriate . . . if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule and such deviation will serve the public interest''); WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969). See also 1998 Biennial Regulatory Review -- Streamlining of Mass Media Applications,
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-640A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-640A1.pdf
                        • attachment to its Waiver Request, Arso provides a Technical Statement which Arso claims demonstrates compliance pursuant to the interim contour-overlap methodology, as discussed in the Ownership Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 13729-30. WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (``WAIT Radio''), cited in Ownership Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 13647. ). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (stating that rule provisions may be waived "for good cause shown"). The Commission declined to adopt any specific waiver criteria relating to radio station ownership in the Ownership Order, but stated that ``[p]arties who believe that the particular facts of their case warrant a waiver of the local radio ownership rule may seek a waiver under the general `good cause'
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1581A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1581A1.pdf
                        • of the date of this Order, transfer the full amount of the outstanding debt to the United States Department of Treasury for debt collection and other administrative or judicial action. Ordering clauseS Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED pursuant to Sections 4(i), 303(r), and 309(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 303(r), and 309(j), and Sections 1.3 and 1.1204(g)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 1.1204(g)(1), that the request for reduction of bid withdrawal payments filed on behalf of Barry P. Lunderville, Connoisseur Media, LLC, College Creek Broadcasting, Inc., Cumulus Licensing LLC, and Kemp Communications, Inc., on November 20, 2006, IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED pursuant to Sections 4(i), 303(r), and 309(j) of
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1874A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1874A1.pdf
                        • has not yet filed a covering license application. See BP-20070601BDE at Exhibit 5 (``Multiple Ownership Exhibit''). WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir 1969) ("WAIT Radio"), cited in Ownership Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 13647. See Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir 1990) (citing WAIT Radio); see also 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (stating that rule provisions may be waived "for good cause shown"). The Commission declined to adopt any specific waiver criteria relating to radio station ownership in the Ownership Order, but stated that "[p]arties who believe that the particular facts of their case warrant a waiver of the local radio ownership rule may seek a waiver under the general 'good cause'
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1948A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1948A1.pdf
                        • encounters significant construction difficulties'' -- would not be undermined by an abbreviated construction period for WUKQ-FM. We have examined the Application, and we find that it complies with all pertinent statutory and regulatory requirements and that its grant, as conditioned herein, would further the public interest, convenience, and necessity. Accordingly we will grant the Application below and, pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Rules, include a condition requiring the completion of the modification of the WUKQ-FM facilities within six months of the date of grant of the Application. We believe this to be sufficient time for Univision to implement the mandated frequency change and to publicize and promote the change to its listeners. Conclusion/Actions. For the reasons set forth above, the
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-588A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-588A1.pdf
                        • 7. We note, but reject, BCI's tautology that the ``automatic downgrade'' procedure adopted in the Streamlining Order, and codified in 47 C.F.R. � 73.3573 Note 4, cannot be waived by the staff because the procedure was adopted by the ``full Commission.'' Id. All Rules emanate from the ``full Commission.'' See 47 C.F.R. �� 0.201, 0.283. See also, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3573, Note 4. The Rule specifies, in pertinent part, that if a station does not implement Class C facilities before its upgrade construction permit expires, the station's allotment reverts to Class C0. See Reply at 5. Streamlining Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 23087. The automatic forfeiture provision eliminated ``the Commission's long-standing practice . . . to
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-673A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-673A1.pdf
                        • both stations. For example, on May 21, 2007, the staff granted an amendment to the KLQQ(FM), Clearmont, Wyoming, application for minor change of a facility (File No. BPH-20070231AFT) to make the application contingent with the application of KGCL(FM), Ten Sleep, Wyoming, for a minor modification to a construction permit (File No. BMPH-20070306AAX), which was also granted. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See Radio 2000, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 15453, 15456 (1996) (Commission affirms practice of accepting untimely amendments to minor change applications, renumbering the application as of the date of the amendment, and billing the applicant the appropriate filing fee where that process served the public interest by providing ``speedier initiation of improved broadcast service to the
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-1084A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-1084A1.pdf
                        • on-air operations, the application is unacceptable). See Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. F.C.C., 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (``[A] waiver is appropriate only if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule and such deviation will serve the public interest,'' citing WAIT Radio v. F.C.C., 418 F.2d 1153, 1157-59 (D.C. Cir. 1969)); see also 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3566(a) (applications which are determined to be patently not in accordance with the FCC rules, regulations, or other requirements, unless accompanied by an appropriate request for waiver, will be considered defective and will not be accepted for filing). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 May 18, 2009 2 3 � �
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-1578A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-1578A1.pdf
                        • Requirements, Minimum Opening Bids, Upfront Payments and Other Procedures for Auction 79,'' Public Notice, DA 09-810, 24 FCC Rcd 4448 � 64 (2009) (``Auction 79 Procedures Public Notice''). See Auction 79 Procedures Public Notice at � 94. 47 C.F.R. � 1.2106(a); see also Part 1 Fifth Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 15316-17 �� 40-42. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 1.925. Part 1 Fifth Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 15317. Id., 15 FCC Rcd at 15316-17. Id. at 15316. The Commission has determined that a policy of strict adherence to payment deadlines is necessary to serve the public interests of integrity, fairness and efficiency of the auction process. See Delta Radio, Inc. v. FCC, 387 F.3d 897,
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-1811A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-1811A1.pdf
                        • Journal Co. v. FCC, 351 F.2d 824 (D.C. Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 967 (1966). Petition at 1. Id. Id. AM Auction Public Notice, 20 FCC Rcd at 10566; see also 47 C.F.R. � 73.3568(a)(1) and Green Valley Broadcasters, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 19 FCC Rcd 13341, 13345-46 (2004) See 47 C.F.R. � 54.720(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (``Northeast Cellular''). In addition, the Commission may take into account considerations of hardship, equity, or more effective implementation of overall policy on an individual basis.
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2360A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2360A1.pdf
                        • (MB 2006) (``Clear Channel'') (waiving Section 73.3598(e) of the Rules and accepting WKRH(FM)'s license application based, in part, on the fact that the facility was fully constructed by the permit's expiration date) , recon. denied, Letter, 23 FCC Rcd 4526 (MB 2008). 47 C.F.R. � 1.106(a)(1). Petition at 1. 47 C.F.R. � 73.3598(e). 47 C.F.R. �� 0.201, 0.283 and � 1.3. See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1156-57 (DC Cir. 1969) (``WAIT'') (Commission may waive any provision of its rules if it determines that good cause has been shown and that grant of the waiver does not undermine the policies set forth by the rule). Id. at 1156-57. See WRKH(FM), Mobile, Alabama, Letter, 23 FCC Rcd 4526, 4529-30,
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-526A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-526A1.pdf
                        • that they ``have adequate access to communications services.'' In addition, we note that Seminole has made it clear that its proposed station would be focused on programming of interest to the Seminole people. Conclusion/Action. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that the Petition for Reconsideration filed by the Seminole Tribe of Florida, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, the request for waiver of Section 73.515 of the Rules, filed by Seminole Tribe of Florida, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that Seminole Tribe of Florida's application for a new NCE-FM station at Big Cypress, Florida, (File No. BNPED-20071019AUM) IS REINSTATED AND ACCEPTED FOR FILING. Petitions to deny are due within thirty
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1270A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1270A1.pdf
                        • Id. Waiver Request at 5; Declaration of Margaret Sommers. Id.. Declaration of Margaret Sommers Declaration of Joseph J. Triarsi. Id. Id. Declaration of Joseph J. Triarsi. 47 C.F.R. � 1.925. See also Waiver Request at 1, 3 (citing 47 C.F.R. � 1.925). We note that the waiver standards of section 1.925, applied in the context of wireless proceedings, and section 1.3, applied in the context of broadcast services, are substantially the same. See Application of Delta Radio, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 16889, 16891 � 7 & n.19 (2003) (citing BellSouth Corp. v. FCC, 162 F.3d 1215, 1225 n.10 (D.C. Cir. 1999), aff'd sub nom., Delta Radio, Inc. v. FCC, 387 F.3d 897 (D.C. Cir. 2004). See Letter
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1725A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1725A1.pdf
                        • would allow Simply Living to avoid its current obligations under the Time-Share Agreement, and ``would be unfair to Bexley, who also wishes to use the unused broadcast time.'' Id. Id. Id. Additionally, throughout the Opposition, Bexley discusses its difficulties in reaching an agreement with Simply Living. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.106. 47 C.F.R. � 73.872(c)(2), (3). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (``WAIT Radio''); Northeast Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). Id. at 1166. WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1157. In the Matter of 2000 Biennial Review, 2010 WL 2780733, (CPD July 13, 2010) (citing WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1157). See Creation of a
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1882A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1882A1.pdf
                        • chance.'') By ``teeing up'' consideration of a system that would select the ``best qualified applicant,'' the Commission clearly announced that it was considering a licensing regime under which it would ``dismiss all of the remaining applicants [in the group] and permit them to file again in the next filing window.'' Comparative MO&O, 16 FCC Rcd at 5104. 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969); Northeast Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). Id. at 1166. WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1157. Comparative MO&O, 16 FCC Rcd at 5104-05. Waiver Request at 5. Comparative MO&O at 5075. See 74 C.F.R. � 73.7003(a), (c); NCE Comparative Order at 7386; Comparative
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-628A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-628A1.pdf
                        • that the contents of the petition are true.''). Finer Living, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 5 FCC 2d 984, 987 (1966). 47 C.F.R. � 73.3587. We note that, like petitions to deny, informal objections must be signed. As discussed, Lewis' pleading was not signed. Nevertheless, we waive that requirement, and consider Lewis' Objection on its merits. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. 47 U.S.C. � 310(d). (informal objections, like petitions to deny, must contain adequate and specific factual allegations sufficient to warrant the relief requested). . See Ingles, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 8815, 8820 n. 32 (2008). See also, WGPR, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 10 FCC Rcd 8140, 8142-46 (1995) (``WGPR''), vacated on other grounds sub nom, Serafyn
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-763A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-763A1.pdf
                        • 595 (1988). 47 C.F.R. �� 73.872(c)(2) and (3). The Florida Institute of Technology made, and the court rejected, a similar argument in Florida Institute. See Florida Institute, 952 F.2d at 553 (arguing that the Commission's failure to follow its own regulations engendered enough detrimental reliance to oblige the Commission to waive its Rules). 47 C.F.R. �� 0.201, 0.283 and � 1.3. See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1156-57 (D.C. Cir. 1969). Sections 73.872(c)(2) and (3) require that each party to a time-share agreement agree to any amendment in the operating hours. 47 C.F.R. � 73.872(c)(2). Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 May 3, 2010 � � � � �%���PNG �` �` b``D� 4 �&)�@�-�@�@�7 H >��O��� p j��
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1492A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1492A1.pdf
                        • a hearsay statement depends on its truthfulness, reasonableness, and credibility. Johnson v. United States, 628 F.2d 187, 190-191 (D.C. Cir. 1980). Here, we can accord little weight to Mr. Kramer's statements, because he is an executive of the company that operates Oregon's stations. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.106. Petition at 8. Petition at 9-10. 47 C.F.R. �� 0.201, 0.283 and 1.3. See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1156-57 (DC Cir. 1969) (Commission may waive any provision of its rules if it determines that good cause has been shown and that grant of the waiver does not undermine the policies set forth by the rule). Amendments of Parts 73 and 74 of the Commission's Rules to Permit Certain Minor
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1605A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1605A1.pdf
                        • the Benefit of Southern Oregon University, Letter, 22 FCC Rcd 17643 (MB 2007) (application pending nine years); Thomas Aquinas School, Letter, 22 FCC Rcd 15651 (MB 2007) (application pending for 12 years). See also Eagle's Nest Fellowship Church, Letter, 23 FCC Rcd 862 (MB 2008) (application pending ten years). Omnibus Order, 22 FCC Rcd at 6125. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (``WAIT Radio''); Northeast Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). WAIT Radio 418 F.2d at 1166. Id. at 1157. KBOO submitted with its Opposition a copy of its bylaws and a detailed account of which Board members were elected, appointed, removed, quit, or were
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-2058A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-2058A1.pdf
                        • whether any of these figures are de minimis under Commission policy and would thus not trigger FM Priorities (1) or (2) for purposes of comparison with other mutually exclusive proposals. 8. A staff engineering analysis has determined that Channel 287C2 can be allotted to Williams, in conformity with the Commission's Rules, provided there is a site restriction of 2.1 kilometers (1.3 miles) northeast at reference coordinates 35-15-57 NL and 112-10-47 WL. Channel 228C2 can be allotted at Ehrenberg at a site 18.8 kilometers (17.9 miles) northeast of the community at coordinates 33-48-00 NL and 114-19-12 WL. Channel 281C can be allotted at First Mesa at a site 16.8 kilometers (105 miles) south of the community at coordinates 35-41-09 NL and 110-21-43
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-504A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-504A1.pdf
                        • the S-R Broadcasting Application , which encompassed not only the infrastructure needed for KRKO(AM) but also the infrastructure needed for another AM station tower at the site.}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs22 \ltrch\fcs0 \cs23\fs22\super \chftn {\footnote \ltrpar \pard\plain \ltrpar \s21\ql \li0\ri0\sa120\widctlpar\wrapdefault\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\ rin0\lin0\itap0 \rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs20\alang1025 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \cs23\super \chftn }{ \rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \i Id.}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 at Sections 1.3 & 3.1.4. The EA explains that \'93 [t]he cumulative impacts of both proposals were environmentally reviewed since the potential for a project similar to the CAAM project but larger in scope was known at the time the environmental review was conducted for KRKO-AM.\'94 }{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 \i Id.}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0 \ltrch\fcs0 at Section 3.1.4.}}}{\rtlch\fcs1 \af0\afs22 \ltrch\fcs0 \fs22 In particular, the EA
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-2A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-2A1.pdf
                        • are included in the ``religion'' format category, according to BIA's database. This category includes religious music and religious talk. If we group BIA's music-focused format categories, we find that 12.6 percent of LPFM stations have music as their primary format. The most popular types of music formats are rock (2.2 percent), classic rock (1.2 percent), oldies (2.3 percent), and country (1.3 percent). Gospel or Southern Gospel is listed as a format for 15 (1.9 percent) stations. There are 28 (3.6 percent) LPFM stations with a Spanish format and two stations with an ethnic format. In addition, 254 stations (33 percent) were classified in the ``miscellaneous'' format category, while only two have news formats and four have talk formats. In BIA's list
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-03-127A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-03-127A1.pdf
                        • caps were interfering with the marketplace's creation of incentives regarding choice of technology. Our basis for choosing to move to a case-by-case analysis in that context simply does not apply in the context of broadcast rules. WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (setting out criteria for waivers of Commission rules); see also 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. See 47 U.S.C.� 309(d). A petition must contain specific allegations of fact sufficient to show that (1) the petitioner is a party in interest, (2) a grant of the application would be prima facie inconsistent with the public interest, and (3) a substantial and material question is presented to be determined by the Commission. Sanders Bros, 309 U.S. at 477;
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-03-14A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-03-14A1.pdf
                        • to potential interference to a Cuban broadcast station. Kesselman did not object to the September 9, 1999, construction deadline at the time the WIJR permit was issued. 47 C.F.R. � 73.3598(b). See generally, 47 C.F.R. � 1.106(b)(2). 47 C.F.R. �1.115(b)(2)(i)-(v). Wendell & Associates, 17 FCC Rcd 18576, 18577 (2002) (``Wendell''). See also 47 C.F.R. � 73.3598(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3. WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969) (``WAIT Radio''), citing Rio Grande Family Radio Fellowship Inc. v. FCC, 406 F.2d 664 (D.C. Cir. 1968). WAIT Radio,418 F.2d at 1157. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe, 401 U.S. 402, 416 (1971). Streamlining MO&O, 14 FCC Rcd at 17541. See 47 C.F.R. �� 73.3534(d) and 73.3535(c)
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-03-201A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-03-201A1.pdf
                        • under Section 1.925 ``must be filed on FCC Form 601, 603, or 605,'' and must be accompanied by a $145.00 fee. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.925(a), 1.925(b), 1.1102. Delta did not file its waiver request on one of those forms, nor did it pay a fee. The Media Bureau has no rules-based waiver standard corresponding to 47 C.F.R. � 1.925. Section 1.3 of the Rules (47 C.F.R. � 1.3), under Part 1 - Practice and Procedure, states that rule provisions may be waived ``for good cause shown,'' and 47 C.F.R. � 73.3566(a), under Part 73 - Radio Broadcast Services, Subpart H - Rules Applicable to All Broadcast Stations, provides that requests for waiver ``shall show the nature of the waiver or exception
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-04-222A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-04-222A1.pdf
                        • its content meets applicable standards and guidelines.''). See 36 C.F.R. Part 61, Appendix A (providing professional standards for the fields of history, archeology, architectural history, architecture, historic architecture). California SHPO Comments at 1; Georgia SHPO Comments at 1-2; Idaho SHPO Comments at 1. Cf. � 81, supra (use of experts unnecessary to establish objectively defined exclusions). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (permitting waiver of rules ``for good cause shown''). Idaho SHPO Comments at 2. We note that ``Indian tribes and Native Hawaiian organizations possess special expertise in assessing the eligibility of historic properties that may possess religious and cultural significance to them.'' 36 C.F.R. � 800.4(c)(1). Notice, 18 FCC Rcd at 11690-11693. See 36 C.F.R. �� 800.6, 800.7. See, e.g., American
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-04-227A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-04-227A1.pdf
                        • WAIT Radio v. FCC , 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied 409 U.S. 1027 (1972). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.106(c). As indicated above, KRI initially requested tolling, not a waiver, based on KRI's lawsuit against the County. Texas Grace Communications, 16 FCC Rcd at 19171 (citing Streamlining MO&O, 14 FCC Rcd at 17541). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (Commission will not waive the rules absent a showing of good cause). Contrary to KRI's argument, the permit was not encumbered by ``administrative review.'' For tolling-related purposes, our rules define administrative review as consideration of ``petitions for reconsideration and applications for review of the grant of a construction permit.'' 47 C.F.R. � 73.3598(b)(ii). KRI alleges something quite different: a petition
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-04-69A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-04-69A1.pdf
                        • infer an intent to deceive based on applicant's alleged motive to obtain favorable action on pending applications). Action regarding KM's construction at the wrong site is discussed infra, note 36. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3598(e). See 47 C.F.R. � 73.1690(b)(2). CMA's own initial survey was also wrong, which may suggest that the site presents survey difficulties. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; Northeast Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (``[W]aiver is appropriate . . . if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule and such deviation will serve the public interest.''); WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969). See 47 C.F.R. � 73.1350(a) (``Each licensee is responsible for maintaining and
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-11-72A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-11-72A1.pdf
                        • The staff practice has been to waive relatively minor filing deadline violations, so long as the applicant can demonstrate that construction was, in fact, completed in a timely manner. BCI argues, however, that the staff's sua sponte waiver of the automatic expiration provision of Section 73.3598(e) of the Rules changes a Commission rule without notice and comment. We disagree. Section 1.3 of the Rules expressly provides that ``any provision of the [R]ules may be waived by the Commission on its own motion . . . ,'' in whole or in part, for good cause shown; such waivers also are well within the staff's delegated authority established in Section 0.283 of the Rules. The staff has exercised its waiver authority in many
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Databases/documents_collection/93-301.pdf
                        • requestforwaiverofSection73.509(x)oftheCommission's Rulesandapplicationforthesamefacility(ARN-880120MF). ThatwaiverrequestwasdeniedandOpenMedia'sapplication wasreturnedonApril20,1988. SeeLettertoOpenMedia FederalCommunicationsCommissionRecord BACKGROUND 2.OnJanuary22,1988,NIU/REBFfiledanapplication foranewnoncommercialeducationalFM("NCE-FM") stationtoserveRockford,Illinois.'OnMay27.1988.Open Mediafiledamutuallyexclusiveapplicationforanew NCE-FMstationtoserveChicago.Illinois.2Byletterdated May26.1989,followinganinformalobjectionbyNIU.the staffdeniedOpenMedia'srequestforwaiverofSection 73.509(x)oftheCommission'sRulesandreturnedOpen Media'sapplication.OnJune23.1989,OpenMediafiled itsapplicationforreviewofthereturnofitsapplication. OnJanuary23.1990,thestaff,bydelegatedauthority. grantedtheapplicationofNIU/REBFconditionedonthe finaldispositionofOpenMedia'sadministrativeappeal. ThegrantofthisconstructionpermitappearedonPublic Notice(ReportNo.20776)ofJanuary29,1990.Thereafter, onFebruary28.1990,OpenMediafileditspetitionfor reconsiderationofthestaffactiongrantingtheNIU/REBF application. DISCUSSION 8FCCRcd.No.13 3. ApplicationforReviewofDismissalofOpenMedia Application.Initsapplicationforreview.OpenMediaar- gues:thatthestafffailedtoconsiderthebasicpublicinter- estquestionsunderSection307(b)oftheCommunications Actof1934.asamended;thatithasmetthestandardfor waivertoreceiveinterferencebydemonstratingthe unavailabilityofalternativesites;thatthestaffrulingis premisedonaninappropriatelegalstandardinthatthe stafftookanabsolutistviewoftheoverlaprule:thatthe requestedwaiverisconsistentwithpreviousactionsbythe Commission;thatthestaffrulingispremisedonanerro- neousunderstandingofthenatureoftheoverlaparea;that underSection307(b)OpenMedia'sproposednewservice toChicagoistobepreferredoverNIU'sduplicativeservice toRockford:andthatthestationfromwhichOpenMedia wouldreceiveinterference.WAUS(FM). BerrienSprings, Michigan.woulditselfreceiveinterferencefromyetan- otherstation.Accordingly;OpenMediaseekstohavethe staffrulingvacated.grantofitsrequestedwaiverofSection 73.509oftheCommission'sRules.andnuncprotuncac- ceptanceofitsapplication. 4.Initsopposition,NIUarguesthat:OpenMedia's failuretocomplywiththeCommission'srulesisfataland thatwaiverisnotwarrantedbecauseOpenMedia'sinabil- itytocoverChicagodoesnotmakeothersitesunavailable; thenon-technicalpublicserviceargumentsshouldbeig- noredandshouldnotbesubstitutedforpurelytechnical allocationsquestions:OpenMedia'sapplicationhasnot beensubjecttodisparatetreatmentasevidencedbythefact thatNIU/REBF'searlierapplicationforanewFMfacility atRockford,Illinoishadbeenreturnedbecausethepro- posalwouldreceiveobjectionableinterferenceto1.3 percentofitsprotected60dBucontour;and.thatOpen Media'snon-technical,servicerelatedargumentsareirrele- CorporationfromDennisWilliams,Chief,FMBranch,Audio ServicesDivision(8920-WJG).Sincethisfirstapplicationwas returnedandnotdeniedordismissedwithprejudice.thestaff determinedthatOpenMedia'sMay27.1988.applicationdidnot violateSection73.3519(Repetitiousapplications)oftheCom- mission'sRules.SeeLettertoOpenMediaCorporationfrom LarryD.Eads,Chief,AudioServicesDivision,datedMay26, 1989(8920-DT)("Eadsletter'). Seen.l 8FCCRcd.No.13 vantandseektoshiftthefocusofinquiryawayfromthe onlyproperissue,namelytheacceptabilityofOpenMe- dia'sapplicationunderSection73.509oftheCommission's Rules.Insummary.NIUarguesthatOpenMedia's voluntarynon-compliancewithSection73.509oftheCom- mission'sRulesmilitatesagainsttherequestedreliefand mandatesaffirmanceofthestaffaction. 5.OpenMedia'sapplicationforreviewisessentiallya restatementofargumentspreviouslyconsideredandre- jectedbythestaff.SeeEadsletter.Therethestaff.citing BoardofEducationoftheCityofAtlanta,48RR2d637, 639(1980).correctlynotedthatincreasedcoverageatthe expenseofobjectionableinterferencealonedoesnotjustify awaiverof'theFMallocationsrules.Acomparisonbe- tweenthenumberofpeopleservedandthenumberpre- cludedisnotnowandhasneverbeenthepertinent standardforjudgingthepreclusionaryeffectofaNCE-FM proposal.ItistheoverallschemeofNCE-FMallocations whichisparamount.andwhenfacedwithachoicebe- tweenalargerserviceareawithoverlapreceivedonone hand.andalessercoveragewithnoprohibitedoverlapon theother.theCommissionfavorsthelatter.SeeEduca- tionalInformationCorporation,6FCCRcd2207.2208 (1991). 6.Moreover.citingICBCCorporationvFCC,716F.2d 926(D.C.Cir.1983).thestaffproperlyrejectedOpen Media'sargumentwhichfocusedonitsprovidingthe"first minority/femalepublicradioservice."Initially.thestaff correctlynotedthatOpenMediamadenoshowingofa deficiencyofNCEservicetoChicagosuchthatawaiverof thetechnicalrules(whichformthebasisfortheCommis- sion'sNCE-FMallocationsscheme)wasnecessarytoper- mitabasiclevelofNCE-FMserviceandthereforewas warranted.Further,eventhoughOpenMediaseeksto achievewhatitbelievestobeacommendableobjective.it iswellestablishedthatourpolicyofrefusingtobasewaiv- ersofrulesdesignedtopreventinterferenceuponnon- technical considerations such as ownership or programmingisarationalimplementationofourmandate to"[makesuchregulationsnotinconsistentwithlawas [we]maydeemnecessarytopreventinterferencebetween stations...."47U.S.C.Section303(f).This policyhasbeen
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Databases/documents_collection/AttachC-04-18-1997.html
                        • allotment will have sixty (60) days from the date the public notice of selection to file an application for construction permit. The [3]Memorandum Opinion and Order that was released simultaneously with the revised expanded band allotment plan extended the filing period to ninety days. A waiver of this requirement would require a traditional "good cause" showing. See 47 C.F.R. Section 1.3. 15. Must I comply with the publication requirements of 47 C.F.R. Section 73.3580? Yes. Applicants must comply with all "new station" publication requirements. 16. I am currently at the local radio ownership cap. Will I need to divest or obtain a waiver prior to obtaining an expanded band station license? No. Expanded band stations are not counted for multiple ownership
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/agree/files/can-bc/can-dtv.pdf
                        • 96 108 115 91 93 102 114 121 72 4.3 Maximum Parameters Associated with Classes Table 4.3.1 Maximum Permissible Parameters for DTV Stations During Transition Class UHF ERP UHF HAAT UPPER VHF ERP UPPER VHF HAAT LOWER VHF ERP LOWER VHF HAAT VL 250 kW 300 m 3.3 kW 300 m 7 kW 300 m VU 107 kW 300 m 1.3 kW 300 m 3 kW 300 m C 15 kW 300 m 300 W 300 m 700 W 300 m B 800 W 150 m 40 W 150 m 130 W 150 m A 40 W 100 m 5 W 100 m 15 W 100 m Table 4.3.2 Maximum Permissible Parameters for DTV Stations After Transition Class UHF ERP UHF
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/agree/files/can-nb/220fin.pdf
                        • to as the Agencies, covers the coordination and use of the frequency band 220 to 222 MHz in the vicinity of the United States-Canada border. The coordinating agency for the United States is the FCC while the coordinating agency for Canada is Industry Canada. 1.2 This Arrangement is subject to review at any time at the request of either Administration. 1.3 Within 120 km of the United States-Canada border the frequencies shall be used as specified in Sections 2, 3 and 4. 1.4 Notwithstanding any other provision of this Arrangement, beyond 120 km from the United States-Canada border each country shall have full use of the 220-222 MHz band. 2. General Sharing Arrangements 2.1 Except as indicated below in Section 3,
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/agree/files/can-nb/lmdsagre.pdf
                        • (LMDS), and certain other services in parts of the 27.35 - 28.35 GHz, 29.1 - 29.25 GHz and 31.0 - 31.3 GHz bands.1 1.2 The responsible coordinating agency for the U.S. is NTIA for the 27.35 � 27.5 GHz band and the FCC for all other bands covered by this Arrangement. The responsible coordinating agency for Canada is Industry Canada. 1.3This Arrangement is subject to review at any time at the request of either Administration. 2. Use of the Bands 2.1 In Canada, the 27.35 - 28.35 GHz (27 GHz) band is designated for LMCS. In the U.S., the 27.35 - 27.5 GHz portion of the band is designated for Federal Government fixed and mobile systems and inter-satellite service and the
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/agree/files/can-nb/mds2way.pdf
                        • in the mobile service. 1.2 This Arrangement replaces the General FCC/DOC Understanding Concerning the Coordination of the 2500-2686 MHz Band Within 80 km (50 miles) of the United States of America/Canada Border, December 5, 1997 and the letter dated December 6, 2000, to Bruce Franca, Office of Engineering and Technology, FCC, from Veena Rawat, Spectrum Planning and Engineering, Industry Canada. 1.3 This Arrangement will be applied provisionally until superceded by a replacement for the Agreement Concerning the Coordination and Use of Radio Frequencies Above Thirty Megacycles per Second, with Annex, as amended3, or other relevant agreements. 1.4 This Arrangement is subject to review at any time at the request of either Administration. 1 For the purpose of this Arrangement, the term
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/agree/files/can-nb/wcsagree.pdf
                        • fixed and mobile (except aeronautical) services; it does not apply to the digital audio radio service (DARS) by satellite nor its terrestrial repeater applications. 1.2 This Arrangement will be applied provisionally until superceded by a replacement for the Agreement Concerning the Coordination and Use of Radio Frequencies Above Thirty Megacycles per Second, with Annex, as amended2 or other relevant agreements. 1.3 This Arrangement is subject to review at any time at the request of either Administration. 2. General Principles 2.1 The bands 2305-2320 MHz and 2345-2360 MHz are to be shared on an equal basis along the border and, to the extent possible, both Administrations shall have full use of these frequencies or sub-bands for the provision of WCS within their
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/agree/files/mex-bc/am.pdf
                        • this Agreetlenc. 1.1 Broadcasting channel (AH) A part of the frequency spectrum,equal to the necessary bandwidth of AX sound broadcasting statloas,and characterlred by the nominal value of the carrier frequency located at its center. 1.2 Objectionable interference Iaterference caused by a signal exceediag the maximum permissible field strength tichia the protected contour,la accordance tith the values derived from this Annex- 1.3 Protected contour Continuous line that delfmfts the area of primary or secondary service which is protected from ob jeccioaable interference. 1.4 Primary service area Service area delimited by the coatour within which the calculated level of the groundwave field strength is protected from objectfoaable interference tn accordance with the provisions of Chapter 6. .- L.5 Secondary service area Service area
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/agree/files/mex-bc/usmexdars.pdf
                        • Appendix I. Furthermore, DARS Repeaters are not permitted to extend DARS coverage outside of the satellite systems' authorized service area, as described in Article III, Section 1. 1.2 The provisions of Section 1.1 above do not apply to existing terrestrial systems of either Party. Such systems shall be subject to the terms and conditions of Section 2 of this Article. 1.3 When coordination of DARS Repeater and terrestrial systems is required, the initiating Administration shall provide the other Administration both by registered mail and, on the same day, by using the most expeditious means (i.e., electronic mail and facsimile messages) with relevant information, including the following: a) Location (Community/State); b) Geographic coordinates of transmitting antenna; c) EIRP (including line loss) value;
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/agree/files/mex-nb/fire.pdf
                        • and use of emergency frequencies listed in Section I, paragraph 2 shall be coordinated with the FCC, San Diego Office. Use of emergency frequencies in Mexico shall be coordinated with the Secretar�a� de Comunicaciones y Transportes acting through the Comisi�n Federal de Telecomunicaciones, prior to each use within the border area described in Section II, paragraph 1 of this Annex. 1.3.Each year, during the first trimester, the United States-Mexico Mixed Commission Charged with Resolving Cases of Radio Interference shall undertake monitoring and coordination activities in order to ensure that, in accordance with paragraph 1.1 above, any unauthorized stations using emergency frequencies are closed down before the peak firefiqhtinq season beqins. ANNEX II MAP ANNEX III OPERATIONAL GUIDELINES FOR 1998 Table of
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/agree/files/mex-nb/usmexdars.pdf
                        • Appendix I. Furthermore, DARS Repeaters are not permitted to extend DARS coverage outside of the satellite systems' authorized service area, as described in Article III, Section 1. 1.2 The provisions of Section 1.1 above do not apply to existing terrestrial systems of either Party. Such systems shall be subject to the terms and conditions of Section 2 of this Article. 1.3 When coordination of DARS Repeater and terrestrial systems is required, the initiating Administration shall provide the other Administration both by registered mail and, on the same day, by using the most expeditious means (i.e., electronic mail and facsimile messages) with relevant information, including the following: a) Location (Community/State); b) Geographic coordinates of transmitting antenna; c) EIRP (including line loss) value;
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files/ITRND01.pdf
                        • 13,144.314,154.8 80,726 17.5 1995 14,159.8 1,759.4 514.2 119.3 6.3 47.9 15,023.416,606.8 85,475 19.4 1996 14,234.1 3,642.7 660.7 118.9 5.0 26.1 15,409.118,687.5 93,361 20.0 1997 15,250.4 4,113.1 850.9 109.8 3.5 28.3 16,654.220,356.0 $89,193100,793 18.7%20.2 1998 14,246.4 4,798.3 921.5 50.5 2.7 36.3 15,737.220,055.7 91,607105,055 17.2 19.1 1999 14,527.6 4,528.0 1,215.9 56.8 1.6 30.8 16,285.520,360.8 93,311108,246 17.5 18.8 2000 14,172.2 7,366.7 1,501.9 32.7 1.3 250.6 16,751.423,381.4 87,767109,615 19.1 21.3 2001 10,844.4 5,341.8 1,467.0 10.3 0.3 199.2 13,392.318,200.0 79,302 99,301 16.9 18.3 2002 9,446.4 5,100.7 988.1 5/ 5/ 112.8 12,005.916,596.6 67,222 83,697 17.9 19.8 2003 8,401.7 5,750.3 620.5 5/ 5/ 156.1 10,303.415,478.7 58,983 77,188 17.5 20.1 See notes at the end of the tables. Table 2 International Telephone Service Per-Minute Data 1/ (Revenues, Payouts, Receipts
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files05/CREPOR05.pdf
                        • 1.0 3.128.124.7 43.1 Luxembourg $3,483,601 0.8 0.020.919.6 58.7 $164,671 0.6 0.023.119.8 56.5 $57,897 98.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 35,632,116 1.6 0.012.232.8 53.4 Malta $1,010,356 6.0 0.5 9.621.9 62.0 $93,865 0.0 0.0 0.017.4 82.6 $430 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 99.8 8,175,730 4.4 0.2 6.232.5 56.6 Netherlands $46,126,097 1.4 0.026.219.7 52.7 $9,378,634 1.5 0.010.842.3 45.4 $10,375,680 97.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.7 760,730,297 1.3 0.015.331.6 51.8 Norway $16,101,944 4.2 0.014.917.7 63.2 $1,510,863 16.5 0.037.712.0 33.8 $6,588,608100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 179,963,091 4.6 0.023.721.3 50.4 Portugal $18,433,780 5.5 0.011.021.2 62.3 $1,214,563 0.8 0.0 4.028.9 66.3 $485,943 97.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.3 229,257,919 8.1 0.0 9.922.2 59.8 Spain $62,612,568 6.0 0.033.814.6 45.6 $3,784,926 24.5 0.013.026.8 35.7 $26,588,892 98.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.8 570,933,062 10.6 0.020.518.4 50.5
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files06/CREPOR06.PDF
                        • traffic. Table A1 shows that carriers reported 72.4 billion minutes of U.S. billed traffic in 2006, for which they billed $7.3 billion. Table A29 shows that 63.9 billion of these minutes and $6.1 billion of this revenue were for calls that originated in the United States or terminated collect or caller toll-free in the United States. Table A30 shows that 1.3 billion of these minutes and $0.3 billion of this revenue was for country-direct and country-beyond type services. Table A31 shows that 7.3 billion of these minutes and $0.9 billion of this revenue was for reorigination services billed to foreign carriers. Foreign billed traffic is all traffic billed by a foreign or correspondent carrier and includes most calls that originate at
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files07/CREPOR07.PDF
                        • 523,828,362 0.0 30.8 0.8 33.6 34.8 Turkey $19,337,349 0.1 25.0 4.9 16.0 53.9 $382,776 0.0 20.3 0.0 0.7 79.0 $379,346 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 200,273,502 0.1 14.8 15.0 17.4 52.8 United Kingdom $246,149,106 0.2 34.5 0.2 22.2 42.8 $26,829,095 0.0 13.3 0.0 17.5 69.2 $64,481,819 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 4,547,339,581 0.2 13.8 1.0 30.5 54.6 Western Europe $776,307,034 0.1 28.5 1.3 20.9 49.2 $81,479,312 0.0 18.1 0.0 26.3 55.6 $170,351,650 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 13,979,516,518 0.1 15.7 1.9 31.3 51.1 Algeria $8,715,356 0.0 7.0 4.3 21.5 67.3 $411,827 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $4,619 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 89,141,636 0.0 4.7 4.1 21.9 69.3 Angola $7,410,226 0.0 30.6 1.3 22.9 45.2 $48,675 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $31,630 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 39,282,697
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files08/CREPOR08.PDF
                        • U.S.-billed traffic. Table A1 shows that carriers reported 75 billion minutes of U.S.-billed traffic in 2008, for which they billed $6.5 billion. Table A25 shows that 64.3 billion of these minutes and $5.5 billion of this revenue were for calls that originated in the United States or terminated collect or caller toll-free in the United States. Table A26 shows that 1.3 billion of these minutes and $0.2 billion of this revenue was for country-direct and country-beyond type services. Table A27 shows that 9.3 billion of these minutes and $0.8 billion of this revenue was for reorigination services billed to foreign carriers. Foreign-billed traffic is all traffic billed by a foreign or correspondent carrier and includes most calls that originate at foreign
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/mb/aoltw/supplement.doc http://www.fcc.gov/mb/aoltw/supplement.txt
                        • post-it notes, alarms, greeting cards, and a daily planner). MovieFone, Inc., acquired by AOL in 1999, is a movie guide and ticketing service that is provided both online and through interactive telephony. Internet music brands Spinner.com, Winamp, and SHOUTcast provide online music services. Spinner.com is an Internet music hub offering access to the Spinner Web-based player and Spinner Plus, a 1.3 megabyte downloadable player that works independently of a listener's Web-browser. Winamp is a music player for Windows, supporting all music formats, including MP3, CD, AudioSoft, Audio Explosion, MOD, and WAV. SHOUTcast is a Winamp-based distribution streaming audio system that enables users with the Winamp high-fidelity audio player and a dial-up Internet connection to provide or tune into Internet streaming audio.
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/mb/peer_review/prlpfm_rpt_economic_study.pdf
                        • are included in the "religion" format category, according to BIA's database. This category includes religious music and religious talk. If we group BIA's music-focused format categories, we find that 12.6 percent of LPFM stations have music as their primary format. The most popular types of music formats are rock (2.2 percent), classic rock (1.2 percent), oldies (2.3 percent), and country (1.3 percent). Gospel or Southern Gospel islisted as a format for 15 (1.9 percent) stations. There are 28 (3.6 percent) LPFM stations with a Spanish format and two stations with an ethnic format. In addition, 254 stations (33 percent) were classified in the "miscellaneous" format category, whileonly two have news formats and four have talk formats. In BIA's list of more
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/mb/peer_review/prrespstudy4b.pdf
                        • a simple frequency distribution of the coded airplay of the 25 recorded LPFM stations versus the 207 recorded noncommercial FM stations in the sample, shown in Table 2. Table 2 � LPFM Airplay LPFM Non-Commercial FM General Category Code Description Intervals % Intervals % . Missing 319 0.9 480 0.2 01 News 120 0.3 42,955 14.4 02 Public Affairs 485 1.3 26,072 8.7 03 Announcements 8 0.0 810 0.3 04 Music 29,268 81.3 146,438 49.1 05 Entertainment & Leisure 2,118 5.9 52,715 17.7 06 Religious Broadcast (Non-music) 1,339 3.7 6,650 2.2 07 Fundraising & Charity 12 0.0 5,093 1.7 08 Advertisements 971 2.7 11,222 3.8 09 Sports 1,246 3.5 638 0.2 10 Other 68 0.2 1 0.0 11 Dead air/Unknown 33
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/database/spectrum/spinvdoc.pdf
                        • in support of your telecommunications needs? If so, This table offers you, the business and academic communities as well as the general public, information on how the radio spectrum is used in the United States so that you can select the most appropriate spectrum to support your needs and determine the impact of your proposed deployment on existing operations. 2 1.3What this table is not! This document is not a rule making procedure. It is just a document providing the public with information. We are not soliciting comments on changes to the allocation's table or service rules. However, we would appreciate knowing about any clerical errors that are found. 1.4What is the current format of this table? The "Spectrum Inventory Table"
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/SHVERA/SHVERA-FCC-05-199.pdf
                        • 30 MINIMUM SIGNAL LEVEL AT TOV Chan 3Chan 10 Chan 30 Planning factor values (dBm) -81.0 -81.0 -84.0 Median across all receivers (dBm) -82.2 -83.2 -83.9 Difference from OET-69 planning factors -1.2 -2.2 0.1 Deviations of receivers from median (dB) --Best performing receiver (dB) -2.5 -1.7 -1.4 --Worst performing receiver (dB) 12.5 4.3 2.5 --90th percentile receiver (dB) 5.1 3.1 1.3 Standard deviation (dB) 3.7 1.6 0.9 Total span from worst to best receiver (dB) 15.0 6.0 3.9 Table 1 Statistics of Minimum Signal Level at TOV 60. The median minimum signal levels for the study sample were slightly better - by 1.2 dB and 2.2 dB, respectively � than the low-VHF and high-VHF planning factor value (-81.0 dBm) and closely
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/peerreview/docs/SHVERA-peer-review-memo.doc
                        • MINIMUM SIGNAL LEVEL AT TOV Chan 3 Chan 10 Chan 30 Planning factor values (dBm) -81.0 -81.0 -84.0 Median across all receivers (dBm) -82.2 -83.2 -83.9 Difference from OET-69 planning factors -1.2 -2.2 0.1 Deviations of receivers from median (dB) --Best performing receiver (dB) -2.5 -1.7 -1.4 --Worst performing receiver (dB) 12.5 4.3 2.5 --90th percentile receiver (dB) 5.1 3.1 1.3 Standard deviation (dB) 3.7 1.6 0.9 Total span from worst to best receiver (dB) 15.0 6.0 3.9 Table 1 Statistics of Minimum Signal Level at TOV The median minimum signal levels for the study sample were slightly better - by 1.2 dB and 2.2 dB, respectively - than the low-VHF and high-VHF planning factor value (-81.0 dBm) and closely matched
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/filings/2004/BrandX.pet.app.final.pdf
                        • the public interest than adherence to the general rule.199 46.If we were to require cable operators to un- bundle cable modem service merely because they also provide cable telephony service, we would in essence create an open access regime for cable Internet service applicable only to some operators. We believe it is 197Id. at � 22. 198See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972). 199Northeast Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). 103a more appropriate to examine the issue of open access on a national basis involving all those Title VI cable systems that choose to offer cable modem service, rather than
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/1997/keller.html http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/1997/keller.wp
                        • Greene had canceled his license. On September 3, in an action central to this case, the Commission granted Lewisville's license even though Greene's canceled license remained in the database. Relying on its waiver regulations, which provide that agency rules "may be ... waived for good cause shown, in whole or in part, at any time by the Commission," 47 C.F.R. 1.3 (1996), the Commission explicitly waived the database deletion requirement as well as all other defects in Lewisville's application: Because Greene's station is no longer operating, we are waiving the requirement that the City of Lewisville obtain Greene's consent to convert this channel to trunked use and, alternatively, we are waiving the requirement that Greene's license be deleted from the database
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/1998/dunifer.html http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/1998/dunifer.wp
                        • in the " 'public interest' if extended to [the] applicant who proposes a new service that will not undermine the policy, served by the rule, that has been adjudged in the public interest." WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1157. FCC regulations do not limit which rules may be waived, upon a proper showing. See Blair Decl. at 3; 47 C.F.R. 1.3. In response to a properly presented waiver application which includes factual material to support a non-frivolous First Amendment claim, the agency must address the constitutional issues raised by the applicant. See WAIT Radio, 418 F.2d at 1156. See also Rio Grande Family Radio Fellowship, Inc. v. FCC, 406 F.2d 664, 666 (D.C.Cir.1968) (to be considered, an application for a waiver
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2000/98-60213.doc http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2000/98-60213.html
                        • 425 (noting "the sorts of implicit subsidies currently used by the FCC in its [DEM] weighting program"). See note 7, supra. See Alltel Corp. v. FCC, 838 F.2d 551, 561 (D.C. Cir. 1988) ("A regulation perfectly reasonable and appropriate in the face of a given problem may be highly capricious if that problem does not exist."). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3; Fourth Reconsideration Order �� 93, 102, 108. See, e.g., 47 U.S.C. � 254(b)(3) (stating that "Consumers in all regions of the Nation" shall receive comparable telephone service). Petitioners estimate that the introduction of competition will result in a loss of approximately 25% of the customer base. The FCC counters with historical trends that would predict market share losses of only
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2000/99-15035.html
                        • broadcasts to a two-block radius. [13]^3 From 1978 to early 2000, FCC regulations prevented the licensing of any new commercial and non-commercial FM stations below 100 watts (Class D stations) except in Alaska. See 47 C.F.R. SS 15.239(a), 73.211(a), 73.511(a). During that time period, however, waiver provisions potentially permitted low power radio broadcasters to receive a license. See 47 C.F.R. 1.3. On January 27, 2000, the FCC adopted rules authorizing the licensing of two new classes of radio stations -- one operating at a maximum power of 100 watts and another at a maximum power of 10 watts. See Creation of Low Power Radio Service, 65 Fed. Reg. 7616 (to be codified at 47 C.F.R. pts. 11, 73, 74) (Feb. 15,
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2001/00-1304.doc http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2001/00-1304.html http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2001/00-1304.pdf
                        • of the Commission's rules provides, in pertinent part: Cellular telephones installed in or carried aboard airplanes, balloons or any other type of aircraft must not be operated while such aircraft are airborne (not touching the ground). When any aircraft leaves the ground, all cellular telephones on board that aircraft must be turned off. 47 C.F.R. � 22.925 (2000). Under � 1.3, the Commission has authority to waive its rules "if good cause therefor is shown." Id. � 1.3. AirCell, Inc. began developing and testing a low-power cellular system installed on general aviation aircraft under a Special Temporary Authority from the Commission in 1992. Two years later, the Commission's Office of Engineering Technology authorized AirCell to operate as an experimental radio station,
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2004/03-3388-062404.pdf
                        • Thus we defer to the Commission's expertise and affirm this particular line-drawing. We also note that the modified rule does not preclude a top-four restriction waiver in a market with more than 12 stations, as the Commission expressly acknowledged its duty to give a "hard look . . . to waiver requests." Id. � 85; see also 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (authorizing waiver of Commission rules "for good cause shown"). 49In all but 18 of the markets ranked 76 to 201, the combined market share of the third- and fourth- ranked station is less than that of the top-ranked station. Ex Parte Communication of National Association of Broadcasters, MB Docket No. 02-277 at 4 88 reduced incentive to improve programming of
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/omd/contracts/pre-award/RFQ11000022-1.pdf
                        • CLINs for access or route diversity. Would the FCC please clarify the intent of providing both critical and diversity CLINs for a single solution? The RFQ is written this way to ensure diversity because Critical service does not in itself guarantee diversity but only conformance to specified Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). For example, refer to GSA Networx Enterprise SOW section B.1.3.1.5, "If the contractor's solution for an IPS Critical Service Level requirement employs two access links..." [emphasis added]. In the case where a vendor's solution for Critical service includes the diversity required by the diversity CLINs, the FCC will consider the diversity requirement as having been met. FCC Networx MTIPS Q&As 2.2.2.5 Equipment Requirements for FCC-DC 5 The RFQ states: "Equipment
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/omd/contracts/pre-award/RFQ11000022.pdf
                        • Office of Managing Director Information Technology Center 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 Wide Area Network Frame Relay Service to Private Line Service & Network Based IP-VPNs Networx Request for Quote RFQ11000022 August 30, 2011 WAN Networx Transition RFQ11000022 ___________________________________________________________________________ Page 2 of 29 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 PROJECT OVERVIEW ..................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Title..................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Background ....................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Acquisition Selected .......................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Fair Opportunity Exception............................................................................................. 3 2 SPECIFIC TASKS AND/OR SERVICES.......................................................................... 4 2.1 Network Based IP-VPN Service (NBIPVPN) ................................................................. 4 2.2 Private Line Service (PLS) ............................................................................................... 4 3 SERVICE REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................................ 5 3.1 Network Based IP-VPN Service ...................................................................................... 5 3.1.1 Network Based IP-VPN Service Requirements .......................................................... 5 3.1.2 Network-Based IP VPN CLINs .................................................................................. 5 3.2 Private Line
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/omd/contracts/pre-award/RevisedSOW-110729.pdf
                        • FCC Emergency Response Group members, employees and contractors that support these entities during times of disaster or crisis. 1.2 Acquisition Goal This statement of work is for an Emergency Mass Notification and Response System, as well as maintenance and support for that system, that will be under the direction of the Office of Managing Director, Associate Managing Director, Administrative Operations. 1.3 Scope of Work The purpose of this task order is to provide an Emergency Mass Notification and Response System, as well as maintenance and support for that system. An Emergency Mass Notification and Response System are critical to the FCC National Outreach Program which must be able to communicate rapidly with the public safety community, licenses and others from any
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/omd/contracts/pre-award/VendorQuestions.pdf
                        • is for the maintenance and support of an existing FCC Emergency Mass Notification and Response System. Section 1.2 should state "This statement of work is for an Emergency Mass Notification and Response System, as well as maintenance and support for that system, that will be under the direction of the Office of Managing Director, Associate Managing Director, Administrative Operations." Section 1.3 of the existing SOW is correct. Vendor Question: Able to simultaneously activate, FCC and personal E-mail, SMS (texting), voice calls, siren and computer pop-up screens. Please identify currently installed sirens that require activation by Manufacturer, Model, Interface etc? Will you be adding sirens to activate and please provide details? Response: The FCC does not currently have a requirement for sirens.
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-broadband-dead-zone-report.pdf
                        • March 2010, but it has been revised to reflect the changes that were made to the information system, etc., when the revised SORN was published in April 2010, as noted above. No 3 If a Privacy Threshold Assessment has not been done, please explain why not: If the Privacy Threshold Assessment (PTA) has been completed, please skip to Question 1.15 1.3 Has this information system, which contains information about individuals, e.g., personally identifiable information (PII), existed under another name, e.g., has the name been changed or modified? Yes No If yes, please explain your response: 1.4 Has this information system undergone a "substantive change" in the system's format or operating system? Yes No If yes, please explain your response: If there
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-ccd.pdf
                        • information: Placed in existing information system-Implementation Date: Placed in new auxiliary/ancillary information system-Date: Other use(s)-Implementation Date: Please explain your response: 1.2 Has a Privacy Threshold Assessment been done? Yes Date: September 2008 No If a Privacy Threshold Assessment has not been done, please explain why not: If the Privacy Threshold Assessment (PTA) has been completed, please skip to Question 1.15 1.3 Has this information system, which contains information about individuals, e.g., personally identifiable information (PII), existed under another name, e.g., has the name been changed or modified? Yes No If yes, please explain your response: 3 1.4 Has this information system undergone a "substantive change" in the system's format or operating system? Yes No If yes, please explain your response: If
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-core-financial.pdf
                        • information: Placed in existing information system-Implementation Date: Placed in new auxiliary/ancillary information system-Date: Other use(s)-Implementation Date: Please explain your response: 1.2 Has a Privacy Threshold Assessment been done? Yes Date: August 2008 No If a Privacy Threshold Assessment has not been done, please explain why not: If the Privacy Threshold Assessment (PTA) has been completed, please skip to Question 1.15 1.3 Has this information system, which contains information about individuals, e.g., personally identifiable information (PII), existed under another name, e.g., has the name been changed or modified? Yes No If yes, please explain your response: 3 1.4 Has this information system undergone a "substantive change" in the system's format or operating system? Yes No If yes, please explain your response: If
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-criminal-investigative-files.pdf
                        • been done, please explain why not: The Criminal Investigative Files information system, including the personally identifiable information (PII) that is covered by the system of records notice (SORN), FCC/OIG-1, "Criminal Investigative Files" SORN, pre-dates the OMB requirements contained in OMB Memorandum M-03-22 (September 22, 2003). If the Privacy Threshold Analysis (PTA) has been completed, please skip to Question 1.15 3 1.3 Has this information system, which contains information about individuals, e.g., personally identifiable information (PII), existed under another name, e.g., has the name been changed or modified? Yes No If yes, please explain your response: This information system has never existed under another name, nor has the name been changed since the SORN was published in the Federal Register on April
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-crisis.pdf
                        • Has a Privacy Threshold Assessment been done? Yes Date: No If a Privacy Threshold Assessment has not been done, please explain why not: This information system is covered by a system of records notice (SORN) that pre-dates the implementation of the Privacy Impact Assessment requirement. If the Privacy Threshold Assessment (PTA) has been completed, please skip to Question 1.15 3 1.3 Has this information system, which contains information about individuals, e.g., personally identifiable information (PII), existed under another name, e.g., has the name been changed or modified? Yes No If yes, please explain your response: This information system's system of records notice (SORN) was previously titled FCC/EB-4, "Crisis Management Contacts," SORN. It has been renamed FCC/PSHSB-1, "Emergency Contacts (EmCon)," SORN. 1.4
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-dqc.pdf
                        • "Data Quality Comments" SORN to collect, manage, maintain, and use any PII that individuals submitted via the Data Quality Comment process. The FCC published an update of FCC/OMD-13, "Data Quality Comments" SORN in the Federal Register on April 5, 2006, see 71 FR 17255, 17256). If the Privacy Threshold Analysis (PTA) has been completed, please skip to Question 1.15 3 1.3 Has this information system, which contains information about individuals, e.g., personally identifiable information (PII), existed under another name, e.g., has the name been changed or modified? Yes No If yes, please explain your response: The FCC created the Data Quality Comments information system to provide a database in which to store the comments that the Commission receives through the FCC's
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-ecfs.pdf
                        • Filing System (ECFS) information system contained personally identifiable information (PII) and created a system of records, FCC/CGB-2, "Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS)" to cover the PII. The FCC subsequently published this SORN in the Federal Register on April 5, 2006, see 71 FR 17255, 17236). If the Privacy Threshold Assessment (PTA) has been completed, please skip to Question 1.15 3 1.3 Has this information system, which contains information about individuals, e.g., personally identifiable information (PII), existed under another name, e.g., has the name been changed or modified? Yes No If yes, please explain your response: The FCC created the Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) information system as part of the Commission's automation and electronic filing system implementation program to improve the
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-email.pdf
                        • Threshold Analysis (PTA) been done? Yes Date: No If a Privacy Threshold Analysis has not been done, please explain why not: This system of records notice pre-dates the OMB requirements contained in OMB Memorandum M-03-18 (September 22, 2003) that established the Privacy Impact Assessment requirements. If the Privacy Threshold Analysis (PTA) has been completed, please skip to Question 1.15 3 1.3 Has this information system, which contains information about individuals, e.g., personally identifiable information (PII), existed under another name, e.g., has the name been changed or modified? Yes No If yes, please explain your response: The information system that is covered by this system of records notice, FCC/OMD-20, "Inter- Office and Remote Access Internet E-mail Systems" SORN, was originally part of
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-experimental-radio.pdf
                        • Privacy Threshold Analysis been done? Yes Date: No If a Privacy Threshold Analysis has not been done, please explain why not: This system of records notice (SORN) pre-dates the OMB requirements contained in OMB Memorandum M-03-22 (September 22, 2003) that created the Privacy Impact Assessment. If the Privacy Threshold Analysis (PTA) has been completed, please skip to Question 1.15 3 1.3 Has this information system, which contains information about individuals, e.g., personally identifiable information (PII), existed under another name, e.g., has the name been changed or modified? Yes No If yes, please explain your response: The Experimental Radio Station License Files information system has never existed under another name nor has the name been changed since this SORN was published in
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-faca.pdf
                        • Threshold Analysis (PTA) been done? Yes Date: No If a Privacy Threshold Analysis has not been done, please explain why not: This system of records notice (SORN) pre-dates the OMB requirements contained in OMB Memorandum M-03-22 (September 22, 2003) that created the Privacy Impact Assessment. If the Privacy Threshold Analysis (PTA) has been completed, please skip to Question 1.15 3 1.3 Has this information system, which contains information about individuals, e.g., personally identifiable information (PII), existed under another name, e.g., has the name been changed or modified? Yes No If yes, please explain your response: The Federal Advisory Committee Membership File (FACA) information system has never existed under another name nor has the name been changed since this SORN was published
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-financial.pdf
                        • system maintains. 1.2 Has a Privacy Threshold Assessment been done? Yes Date: No If a Privacy Threshold Assessment has not been done, please explain why not: This information system has a system of records notice (SORN) that pre-dates the implementation of the Privacy Impact Assessment requirement. If the Privacy Threshold Assessment (PTA) has been completed, please skip to Question 1.15 1.3 Has this information system, which contains information about individuals, e.g., personally identifiable information (PII), existed under another name, e.g., has the name been changed or modified? Yes No 2 If yes, please explain your response: 1.4 Has this information system undergone a "substantive change" in the system's format or operating system? Yes No If yes, please explain your response: The
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-foia.pdf
                        • done? Yes Date: No If a Privacy Threshold Assessment has not been done, please explain why not: The paper files and electronic data in this information system are covered by a system of records notice (SORN) that pre-dates the implementation of the Privacy Impact Assessment requirement. If the Privacy Threshold Assessment (PTA) has been completed, please skip to Question 1.15 1.3 Has this information system, which contains information about individuals, e.g., personally identifiable information (PII), existed under another name, e.g., has the name been changed or modified? Yes No 3 If yes, please explain your response: 1.4 Has this information system undergone a "substantive change" in the system's format or operating system? Yes No If yes, please explain your response: If
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-general-investigative-files.pdf
                        • 1.2 Has a Privacy Threshold Analysis (PTA) been done? Yes Date: No If a Privacy Threshold Analysis has not been done, please explain why not: This system of records, FCC/OIG-2, "General Investigative Files," pre-dates the OMB requirements contained in OMB Memorandum M-03-22 (September 22, 2003). If the Privacy Threshold Analysis (PTA) has been completed, please skip to Question 1.15 3 1.3 Has this information system, which contains information about individuals, e.g., personally identifiable information (PII), existed under another name, e.g., has the name been changed or modified? Yes No If yes, please explain your response: This information system has never existed under another name, nor has the name been changed since the SORN was published in the Federal Register on April
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-ils.pdf
                        • System (ILS) Records information system contained personally identifiable information (PII) and created a system of records, FCC/OMD-12, "Integrated Library System (ILS) Records" to cover the PII. The FCC subsequently published this SORN in the Federal Register on April 5, 2006, see 71 FR 17255, 17254). If the Privacy Threshold Assessment (PTA) has been completed, please skip to Question 1.15 2 1.3 Has this information system, which contains information about individuals, e.g., personally identifiable information (PII), existed under another name, e.g., has the name been changed or modified? Yes No If yes, please explain your response: The FCC created the Integrated Library System (ILS) Records information system as part of the library automation plan. This information system has never existed under another
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-investigations-hearings.pdf
                        • system contained personally identifiable information (PII) and created a system of records, FCC/EB-3, "Investigations and Hearings" SORN to cover the PII contained in this information system. The FCC subsequently published this SORN in the Federal Register on April 5, 2006; see 71 FR 17255, 17254). If the Privacy Threshold Assessment (PTA) has been completed, please skip to Question 1.15 3 1.3 Has this information system, which contains information about individuals, e.g., personally identifiable information (PII), existed under another name, e.g., has the name been changed or modified? Yes No If yes, please explain your response: The FCC created the Investigations and Hearings information system when the Enforcement Bureau was created to centralize the FCC's investigations and hearings policies, activities, and programs
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-labor-employee-relations.pdf
                        • "Labor and Employee Relations Case Files" SORN, pre-dates the requirements in OMD Memorandum M-03-22 (September 22, 2003). This SORN, which was previously titled, FCC/OMD-2, "Labor Relations and Employee Performance Files," was published in the Federal Register on April 5, 2006, see 71 FR 17234, 17248). 3 If the Privacy Threshold Analysis (PTA) has been completed, please skip to Question 1.15 1.3 Has this information system, which contains information about individuals, e.g., personally identifiable information (PII), existed under another name, e.g., has the name been changed or modified? Yes No If yes, please explain your response: As noted in Question 1.2, the Labor and Employee Relations Case Files information system was previously titled "Labor Relations and Employee Performance Files" when the SORN,
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-lmts.pdf
                        • analyze, use, and store. The FCC will publish the system of records notice (SORN) in the Federal Register. 1.2 Has a Privacy Threshold Analysis (PTA) been done? Yes Date: December 2008 No If a Privacy Threshold Analysis has not been done, please explain why not: If the Privacy Threshold Analysis (PTA) has been completed, please skip to Question 1.15 3 1.3 Has this information system, which contains information about individuals, e.g., personally identifiable information (PII), existed under another name, e.g., has the name been changed or modified? Yes No If yes, please explain your response: 1.4 Has this information system undergone a "substantive change" in the system's format or operating system? Yes No If yes, please explain your response: If there
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-pams.pdf
                        • system of records notice (SORN), FCC/OMD-26, "Personnel Availability Management System (PAMS)," to cover the PII in this information system. 1.2 Has a Privacy Threshold Analysis been done? Yes Date: April 22, 2009 No If a Privacy Threshold Analysis has not been done, please explain why not: If the Privacy Threshold Analysis (PTA) has been completed, please skip to Question 1.15 1.3 Has this information system, which contains information about individuals, e.g., personally identifiable information (PII), existed under another name, e.g., has the name been changed or modified? 3 Yes No If yes, please explain your response: 1.4 Has this information system undergone a "substantive change" in the system's format or operating system? Yes No If yes, please explain your response: If
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-pay-leave-garnish.pdf
                        • has not been done, please explain why not: 3 The merged system of records notice (SORN) FCC/OMD-14, "Pay, Leave, and Garnishment Records" that covers the personally identifiable information (PII) in the Pay, Leave, and Garnishment information system pre-dates the requirements in OMD Memorandum M-03-22 (September 22, 2003). If the Privacy Threshold Analysis has been completed, please skip to Question 1.15 1.3 Has this information system, which contains information about individuals, e.g., personally identifiable information (PII), existed under another name, e.g., has the name been changed or modified? Yes No If yes, please explain your response: The merged Pay, Leave, and Garnishment Records information system includes the databases that contain information with which the FCC performs a variety of payroll, wage collection,
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-personal-security-files.pdf
                        • information system, including the personnally identifiable information (PII) covered by the system of records notice (SORN), FCC/OMD-16, "Personal Security Files" pre-dates the implementation of the Privacy Impact Assessment requirement. The SORN was published in the Federal Register on September 25, 2006 (71 FR 55787, 55790). If the Privacy Threshold Analysis (PTA) has been completed, please skip to Question 1.15 3 1.3 Has this information system, which contains information about individuals, e.g., personally identifiable information (PII), existed under another name, e.g., has the name been changed or modified? Yes No If yes, please explain your response: As noted in Question 1.1, this information system was revised to conform to the HSPD-12 requirements in 2006. As part of this process, the FCC changed
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-physical-access.pdf
                        • Has a Privacy Threshold Assessment been done? Yes Date: No If a Privacy Threshold Assessment has not been done, please explain why not: This information system is covered by a system of records notice (SORN) that pre-dates the implementation of the Privacy Impact Assessment requirement. If the Privacy Threshold Assessment (PTA) has been completed, please skip to Question 1.15 3 1.3 Has this information system, which contains information about individuals, e.g., personally identifiable information (PII), existed under another name, e.g., has the name been changed or modified? Yes No If yes, please explain your response: The system of records notice (SORN) that covers this information system was previously titled FCC/Central-10, "Access Control System." It was renamed and re-numbered FCC/OMD-24, "Physical Access
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-reasonable-accommodation-requests.pdf
                        • Accommodations Requests" SORN, pre- dates the requirements in OMB Memorandum M-03-18 (September 22, 2003). This SORN, which was previously titled, FCC/OWD-1, "Reasonable Accommodation Requests under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973," was published in the Federal Register on April 5, 2006, see 71 FR 17234, 17268). 3 If the Privacy Threshold Analysis (PTA) has been completed, please skip to Question 1.15 1.3 Has this information system, which contains information about individuals, e.g., personally identifiable information (PII), existed under another name, e.g., has the name been changed or modified? Yes No If yes, please explain your response: As noted in Question 1.2, the Reasonable Accommodation Requests information system was previously titled, Reasonable Accommodations Requests under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. 1.4 Has this
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-remedy.pdf
                        • Threshold Analysis (PTA) been done? Yes Date: No If a Privacy Threshold Analysis has not been done, please explain why not: This system of records notice pre-dates the OMB requirements contained in OMB Memorandum M-03-22 (September 22, 2003) that created the Privacy Impact Assessment requirements. If the Privacy Threshold Analysis (PTA) has been completed, please skip to Question 1.15 2 1.3 Has this information system, which contains information about individuals, e.g., personally identifiable information (PII), existed under another name, e.g., has the name been changed or modified? Yes No If yes, please explain your response: The information system that is covered by this system of records notice was originally part of another FCC system of records notice (SORN), FCC/Central-8, "Telephone Call
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-rmis.pdf
                        • information: Placed in existing information system-Implementation Date: Placed in new auxiliary/ancillary information system-Date: Other use(s)-Implementation Date: Please explain your response: 1.2 Has a Privacy Threshold Assessment been done? Yes Date: September 2008 No If a Privacy Threshold Assessment has not been done, please explain why not: If the Privacy Threshold Assessment (PTA) has been completed, please skip to Question 1.15 1.3 Has this information system, which contains information about individuals, e.g., personally identifiable information (PII), existed under another name, e.g., has the name been changed or modified? Yes No If yes, please explain your response: 3 1.4 Has this information system undergone a "substantive change" in the system's format or operating system? Yes No If yes, please explain your response: If
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-small-business-contacts.pdf
                        • why not: In 2006, the FCC determined that the Small Business Contacts List information system included personally identifiable information (PII). The FCC published the system of records notice (SORN) covering the PII in the Federal Register on April 5, 2006, see 71 FR 17234, 17240. If the Privacy Threshold Analysis (PTA) has been completed, please skip to Question 1.15 3 1.3 Has this information system, which contains information about individuals, e.g., personally identifiable information (PII), existed under another name, e.g., has the name been changed or modified? Yes No If yes, please explain your response: The Small Business Contacts List information system has never existed under another name, nor has its name been changed since the FCC published this SORN in
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-telephone-call-details.pdf
                        • Threshold Analysis (PTA) been done? Yes Date: No If a Privacy Threshold Analysis has not been done, please explain why not: This system of records notice pre-dates the OMB requirements contained in OMB Memorandum M-03-22 (September 22, 2003) that created the Privacy Impact Assessment requirements. If the Privacy Threshold Analysis (PTA) has been completed, please skip to Question 1.15 3 1.3 Has this information system, which contains information about individuals, e.g., personally identifiable information (PII), existed under another name, e.g., has the name been changed or modified? Yes No If yes, please explain your response: The information system that is covered by this system of records notice, FCC/OMD-18, "Telephone Call Detail" SORN, was originally part of another FCC system of records
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-transit.pdf
                        • 22, 2007). 1.2 Has a Privacy Threshold Assessment been done? Yes Date: No If a Privacy Threshold Assessment has not been done, please explain why not: This information system has a system of records notice (SORN) that pre-dates the implementation of the Privacy Impact Assessment requirement. If the Privacy Threshold Assessment (PTA) has been completed, please skip to Question 1.15 1.3 Has this information system, which contains information about individuals, e.g., personally identifiable information (PII), existed under another name, e.g., has the name been changed or modified? Yes No If yes, please explain your response: 3 1.4 Has this information system undergone a "substantive change" in the system's format or operating system? Yes No If yes, please explain your response: If
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-uls.pdf
                        • Privacy Threshold Assessment been done? Yes Date: No If a Privacy Threshold Assessment has not been done, please explain why not: This system of records notice pre-dates the OMB requirements contained in OMB Memorandum M-03-22 (September 22, 2003) that created the Privacy Impact Assessment requirements. If the Privacy Threshold Assessment (PTA) has been completed, please skip to Question 1.15 3 1.3 Has this information system, which contains information about individuals, e.g., personally identifiable information (PII), existed under another name, e.g., has the name been changed or modified? Yes No If yes, please explain your response: The information systems that are covered by this system of records notice, FCC/WTB-1, "Wireless Services Licensing Records (ULS)" SORN have existed under this SORN since the
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-violators.pdf
                        • Privacy Threshold Analysis (PTA) been done? Yes Date: No If a Privacy Threshold Analysis has not been done, please explain why not: The Violators Files information system has a system of records, FCC/EB-1, "Violators Files," that pre-dates the implementation of the Privacy Impact Assessment requirement. 3 If the Privacy Threshold Analysis (PTA) has been completed, please skip to Question 1.15 1.3 Has this information system, which contains information about individuals, e.g., personally identifiable information (PII), existed under another name, e.g., has the name been changed or modified? Yes No If yes, please explain your response: The FCC developed the Violators Files information system when the Enforcement Bureau was created to centralize the FCC's Violators Files policies, activities, and programs in one
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pshsb-coop-plan.pdf
                        • the FCC determined that the COOP information system contained PII and created a system of records, FCC/OMD-11, "Continuity of Operations Plan (COOP)" to cover the PII. The FCC subsequently published this SORN in the Federal Register on April 5, 2006, see 71 FR 17234, 17254. 2 If the Privacy Threshold Analysis (PTA) has been completed, please skip to Question 1.15 1.3 Has this information system, which contains information about individuals, e.g., personally identifiable information (PII), existed under another name, e.g., has the name been changed or modified? Yes No If yes, please explain your response: The COOP plan information system has never existed under another name. However, the SORN that covers the PII contained in this information system was changed to
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pta-broadband-dead-zone-report.pdf
                        • the broadband services being provided. The Consumer Broadband Test permits users, e.g., individuals, to measure the quality of their fixed or mobile Internet broadband connection. If this is a new information system, please skip to Question 1.6. 1.2 Has this information system existed under another name, or has the name been changed or modified? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.3 Has this information system existed previously or been operated under any other software program, information system medium, i.e., electronic database or paper files, and/or other format? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.4 Has this information system existed under a system of records notice (SORN) by itself, or was it ever part or component of another SORN? Yes No Please
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pta-ccd.pdf
                        • have a paper copy of the comment card available for participants in PSHSB's summits, conferences, and public forums, etc. to write in their comments. If this is a new information system, please skip to Question 1.6. 3 1.2 Has this information system existed under another name, or has the name been changed or modified? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.3 Has this information system existed previously or been operated under any other software program, information system medium, i.e., electronic database or paper files, and/or other format? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.4 Has this information system existed under a system of records notice (SORN) by itself, or was it ever part or component of another SORN? Yes No Please
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pta-clarity.pdf
                        • Center (ITC) is installing the Clarity Portfolio Project Management Application information system ("Clarity") to track work performance measurements for the Commission's information technology investments. If this is a new information system, please skip to Question 1.6. 1.2 Has this information system existed under another name, or has the name been changed or modified? Yes 2 No Please explain your response: 1.3 Has this information system existed previously or been operated under any other software program, information system medium, i.e., electronic database or paper files, and/or other format? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.4 Has this information system existed under a system of records notice (SORN) by itself, or was it ever part or component of another SORN? Yes No Please
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pta-core-financial.pdf
                        • financial operations. The CFSR information system may also store and administer paper records and other documents in other formats, i.e., diskettes, electronic tape, etc. If this is a new information system, please skip to Question 1.6. 3 1.2 Has this information system existed under another name, or has the name been changed or modified? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.3 Has this information system existed previously or been operated under any other software program, information system medium, i.e., electronic database or paper files, and/or other format? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.4 Has this information system existed under a system of records notice (SORN) by itself, or was it ever part or component of another SORN? Yes No Please
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pta-lmts.pdf
                        • was known as the Automated Correspondence Management System (ACMS). In 2006, OLA took advantage of 3 new programming technologies and reprogrammed this information system, which OLA renamed as the Legislative Management Tracking System (LMTS), a new system built on the foundation (database) of the old information system. In 2009, the reporting capabilities of LMTS were moved to Business Objects software. 1.3 Has this information system existed previously or been operated under any other software program, information system medium, i.e., electronic database or paper files, and/or other format? Yes No Please explain your response: Please see Question 1.2 above. 1.4 Has this information system existed under a system of records notice (SORN) by itself, or was it ever part or component of
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pta-pams.pdf
                        • March, 2007. If this is a new information system, please skip to Question 1.6. 1.2 Has this information system existed under another name, or has the name been changed or modified? Yes No Please explain your response: 3 The FCC's Office of Managing Director, Associate Managing Director, Administrative Operations (AMD-AO) created PAMS in 2005 and has administrative responsbility for PAMS. 1.3 Has this information system existed previously or been operated under any other software program, information system medium, i.e., electronic database or paper files, and/or other format? Yes No Please explain your response: As noted above, the PAMS information system was upgraded from Cold Fusion 5 to Cold Fusion 7 in March 2007. 1.4 Has this information system existed under a
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pta-rmis.pdf
                        • financial operations. The CFSR information system may also store and administer paper records and other documents in other formats, i.e., diskettes, electronic tape, etc. If this is a new information system, please skip to Question 1.6. 3 1.2 Has this information system existed under another name, or has the name been changed or modified? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.3 Has this information system existed previously or been operated under any other software program, information system medium, i.e., electronic database or paper files, and/or other format? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.4 Has this information system existed under a system of records notice (SORN) by itself, or was it ever part or component of another SORN? Yes No Please
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/materials/already-released/survivor090002.pdf
                        • viewing, the figures are percentages of total viewing and sum to 100 percent. 1990-91 2000-01 Broadcast- Only Households Cable Households Difference Broadcast- Only Households Cable HouseholdsDifference Total TV Viewing 41.6 54.7 13.1 45.3 63.0 17.7 Total Broadcast 41.6 31.9 -9.7 45.3 26.8 -18.5 Network Affiliates* 29.4 24 -5.4 29.4 20.8 -8.6 Independents** 10.3 8.1 -2.2 12.9 4.7 -8.2 PBS 1.9 1.3 -0.6 3.0 1.3 -1.7 Total Cable -- 22.8 -- 36.2 Ad-Supported -- 18.2 -- 29.8 Premium Pay -- 4.6 -- 4.0 All Other Cable*** -- -- -- 2.4 Source: Cabletelevision Advertising Bureau,Cable TV Facts 1992 ed., p. 6 and 2002 ed. p. 41. Notes: * Network affiliates ABC/CBS/NBC in 1990-91 and ABC/CBS/NBC/FOX in 2000-01. ** WB/UPN/PAX affiliates and independents. ***This
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-b.pdf
                        • 2.9 1.5 Adult Contemp./New Rock 0.6 1.1 0.3 1.1 1.5 0.6 AC/Soft Adult Contemp. 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 Album Oriented Rock (AOR) 5.3 6.0 0.7 4.5 4.9 2.4 AOR/Adult Contemp. 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 AOR/Classic Rock 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Album Oriented Rock/New Rock 3.0 3.7 0.5 3.1 3.3 1.9 Album Oriented Rock/Progressive 1.0 1.3 0.1 1.8 1.6 0.6 Black 7.5 1.7 32.5 1.6 4.0 1.6 Black/Adult Contemp. 3.2 0.8 18.3 1.4 4.6 1.7 Black/Gospel 1.2 0.0 1.8 0.1 0.0 0.0 Black/Oldies 1.0 0.1 2.4 0.3 0.5 0.0 Black/Talk 0.2 0.0 1.4 0.3 0.4 0.0 Big Band/Nostalgia 4.7 4.2 0.5 4.2 4.1 1.2 Big Band/Nostalgia/Religious 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Country 13.0 11.9 1.5
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-c.pdf
                        • 2.9 1.5 Adult Contemp./New Rock 0.6 1.1 0.3 1.1 1.5 0.6 AC/Soft Adult Contemp. 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 Album Oriented Rock (AOR) 5.3 6.0 0.7 4.5 4.9 2.4 AOR/Adult Contemp. 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 AOR/Classic Rock 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Album Oriented Rock/New Rock 3.0 3.7 0.5 3.1 3.3 1.9 Album Oriented Rock/Progressive 1.0 1.3 0.1 1.8 1.6 0.6 Black 7.5 1.7 32.5 1.6 4.0 1.6 Black/Adult Contemp. 3.2 0.8 18.3 1.4 4.6 1.7 Black/Gospel 1.2 0.0 1.8 0.1 0.0 0.0 Black/Oldies 1.0 0.1 2.4 0.3 0.5 0.0 Black/Talk 0.2 0.0 1.4 0.3 0.4 0.0 Big Band/Nostalgia 4.7 4.2 0.5 4.2 4.1 1.2 Big Band/Nostalgia/Religious 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Country 13.0 11.9 1.5
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/workshop-110209/wildman.pdf
                        • StnsOther Radio Stations City gov't 24.0 20.6 16.4 19.4 19.4 County gov't 2.8 2.5 3.9 5.4 5.4 Reg. gov't 0.8 0.1 0.3 1.0 0.5 Education 7.8 10.7 4.5 5.4 4.3 Crime/Courts 23.2 8.2 31.1 28.1 26.3 Accidents/Disasters 5.6 1.0 11.6 9.7 11.8 Human/Community interest 16.3 41.3 12.7 14.0 11.3 Business/Economy 17.0 14.4 16.7 15.7 17.2 All else 2.6 1.1 2.7 1.3 3.8 Total 100 100 100 100 100 12 News Outlets vsOutlets with Local News TV Stations News Outlets vsOutlets with Local News Radio News Outlets vsOutlets with Local News Daily Newspapers News Outlets vsOutlets with Local News Weekly Newspapers News Outlets vsOutlets with Local News Citizen web news and blogsites
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/disaster/disaster_manual.pdf
                        • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Disaster Information Reporting System (DIRS) User Manual Version 2 March 9, 2009 ii Table of Contents 1 Using the System...............................................................................................1 1.1 Introduction........................................................................................................1 1.2 Accessing the Disaster Information Reporting System......................................1 1.3 Security Banner..................................................................................................1 1.4 DIRS Login........................................................................................................2 1.5 Screen for New Users.........................................................................................3 1.6 Screen for Forgotten Password Request.............................................................5 1.7 User Main Menu Screen.....................................................................................5 1.8 Display/Update Reports.....................................................................................7 1.9 Modify Password................................................................................................8 1.10 Modify User Profile............................................................................................9 1.11 Modify Company ID..........................................................................................9 1.12 Manage User.....................................................................................................10 1.13 Upload Tab Delimited File...............................................................................11 1.14 Download Excel File........................................................................................11 2 Wireline Switch...............................................................................................12 3 Wireline Digital Loop Carrier (DLC)..........................................................16 4 Wireline PSAP................................................................................................19 5
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs-best/NSTACreport07.pdf
                        • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit THE PRESIDENT'S NATIONAL SECURITY TELECOMMUNICATIONS ADVISORY COMMITTEE NSTAC Report to the President on Emergency Communications and Interoperability January 16, 2007 President's National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee Emergency Communications and Interoperability i TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................................................................ES�1 1.0 INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................................1 1.1 Background and Charge..........................................................................................1 1.2 Approach.................................................................................................................3 1.3 Scope of the NSTAC Review.................................................................................3 1.4 Report Organization................................................................................................5 2.0 EXPANSION OF NATIONAL SECURITY AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PRIORITY SERVICES AND DEPLOYABLE CAPABILITIES.............................................7 2.1 Deployable Communications Capabilities..............................................................8 2.2 Telecommunications Service Priority Enhancement for Wireless .......................... Networks...............................................................................................................13 3.0 INPUTS TO THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS STRATEGY........17 3.1 Expansion of National Security and Emergency Preparedness Policy to ................ Support Emergency Communications..................................................................18 3.2 Critical National Emergency
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/clearinghouse/GovernanceandSCIPImplementationGuide_FINAL_12_19_08.pdf
                        • training and exercises, and infrastructure sharing. Figure 2-1: NECP Strategy 6 Establishing Governance to Achieve Statewide Communications Interoperability There are four priority initiatives that support NECP Objective 1: 1.1 Facilitate the development of effective governance groups and designated emergency communications leadership roles. 1.2 Develop standardized emergency communications performance objectives and link to DHS' overall system for assessing preparedness capabilities nationwide. 1.3 Integrate strategic and tactical emergency communications planning efforts across all levels of government. 1.4 Develop coordinated grant requirements that promote Federal participation and coordination in communications planning processes, governance bodies, joint training and exercises, and infrastructure sharing. This document, specifically the collaborative governance methodology described in Chapter 3 (Statewide Governance Methodology-Key Elements & Fundamental Components), can help States align and
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/clearinghouse/plans/University_of_Washington_Emergency_Response_Management_Plan_4-2009.pdf
                        • SE E M MAANNAAG GE EM ME EN NTT P PLLAANN Table of Contents April 2009 University of Washington Emergency Response Management Plan Table of Contents Page Letter of Promulgation i Foreword ii Distribution List of Plan Holders iii Record of Revisions iv Basic Plan Section 1 Introduction 1.1 Purpose 1.1 Relationship with other University Groups 1.2 Laws and Authorities 1.3 Disaster Coordination with Local, County and State Agencies (Figure 1) 1.4 Planning Assumptions (Situation) 1.5 Concept of Operations 1.5 Plan Objectives 1.6 Levels of Emergency and Activation 1.8 Emergency Authority 1.9 (President's) Emergency Policy Council 1.9 UW Campus Emergency Operations Center 1.10 UW Campus EOC Activation Process (Figure 2) 1.11 Plan Usage 1.12 Plan Content and Format 1.12 Tabs and
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/clearinghouse/plans/WISCONSIN_EMS_Comms_Plan_10-2006.pdf
                        • 131 / 133 PO Box 2659 Madison, WI 35701-2659 Phone: (608) 261-9306 Fax: (608) 261-6392 Email: wittkpv@dhfs.state.wi.us 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 GLOSSARY 3 SECTION 1 � COMMUNICATION SYSTEM COMPONENTS 1.0 Introduction � System Components 6 1.1 Public Access to EMS after Discovery of a Medical Emergency 6 1.2 Dispatch and Coordination of Response 7 1.3 Medical Control Communications 7 1.4 Interagency Communications 7 1.5 Education for Users 8 SECTION 2 - STATE EMS COMMUNICATIONS PLAN 2.0 Administrative Overview � State Authority 9 2.1 Public Access to the EMS System after Discovery of a Medical Emergency 10 2.2 Dispatch and Coordination of Response 10 2.3 Medical Control Communications 10 2.4 Interagency Communications Local Regional ALS Intercept
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/emergency-information/Pandemic_Comms_Impact_Study_%28December%202007%29.pdf
                        • the probability of the telecommuting strategy succeeding during a pandemic. Worst Case Mechanisms � Continue to work with industry to investigate mechanisms to implement when voluntary compliance with best practices is not enough to enable the telecommuting strategy to succeed. iv Table of Contents 1 Introduction 1-1 1.1 Purpose 1-1 1.2 Background 1-1 1.2.1 Pandemic Influenza 1-1 1.2.2 Telecommuting 1-1 1.3 Problem Definition 1-2 1.4 Scope 1-2 1.5 Document Organization 1-3 2 Stakeholder Involvement 2-1 3 Methodology 3-1 3.1 Potential Congestion Points 3-1 3.2 Recommended Preparations 3-1 3.3 Modeling 3-1 4 Potential Congestion Points 4-1 4.1 Assumptions 4-1 4.1.1 Pandemic Influenza 4-1 4.1.2 Network User Behavior 4-1 4.1.3 Communications Infrastructure 4-1 4.2 Enterprise Networks 4-3 4.2.1 Pandemic Preparedness 4-3 4.2.2 Potential
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/emergency-information/Pandemic_Comms_Impact_Study_(December%202007).pdf
                        • the probability of the telecommuting strategy succeeding during a pandemic. Worst Case Mechanisms � Continue to work with industry to investigate mechanisms to implement when voluntary compliance with best practices is not enough to enable the telecommuting strategy to succeed. iv Table of Contents 1 Introduction 1-1 1.1 Purpose 1-1 1.2 Background 1-1 1.2.1 Pandemic Influenza 1-1 1.2.2 Telecommuting 1-1 1.3 Problem Definition 1-2 1.4 Scope 1-2 1.5 Document Organization 1-3 2 Stakeholder Involvement 2-1 3 Methodology 3-1 3.1 Potential Congestion Points 3-1 3.2 Recommended Preparations 3-1 3.3 Modeling 3-1 4 Potential Congestion Points 4-1 4.1 Assumptions 4-1 4.1.1 Pandemic Influenza 4-1 4.1.2 Network User Behavior 4-1 4.1.3 Communications Infrastructure 4-1 4.2 Enterprise Networks 4-3 4.2.1 Pandemic Preparedness 4-3 4.2.2 Potential
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/speeches/Hinshaw%20-%20PSAP%20Brfg%20-%20FCC%20Trng%206-25-09.pdf
                        • support, funding stream, legislation, national organizations (National Emergency Number Association) 9 1 1 In Disaster Operations �All 911 calls are routed to the nearest 911 Call Center (Public Safety Answer Point) �Accurate call back number (ANI) and location information (ALI) are provided to 911 call takers with all Wireline calls �During 2005 AT&T California processed: �15.4 Million 911 calls �Average 1.3 Million 911 calls per month 9 1 1 In Disaster Operations �911 Network �SS7 trunking, `Digital ALI'Network, CAMA Trunks, 911 Selective Routers, etc �911 Database �20 Million ALI records within the AT&T footprint �Fully redundant system and network configuration �Developed and maintained in partnership with County Coordinators, ILECs and CLECs �AT&T Ca. 911 Database accuracy exceeds 99.89%! 9 1 1
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/outage/nors_manual.pdf
                        • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Network Outage Reporting System User Manual Version 6 April 9, 2009 ii Table of Contents 1 Logging Onto the Network Outage Reporting System .................................1 1.1 Accessing the Network Outage Reporting System............................................1 1.2 Security Banner..................................................................................................1 1.3 NORS Login Screen...........................................................................................2 1.3.1 Screen for New Users with New Notifications...........................................4 1.3.2 Screen for Password Request......................................................................5 1.3.3 Password Expiration...................................................................................6 2 User Main Menu Screen..................................................................................6 2.1 Find a Report......................................................................................................8 2.2 Report Notification.............................................................................................8 2.3 Update/Resubmit/Withdraw a Report..............................................................10 2.3.1 Screen for Updating Notifications, Initial Reports and Drafts, and Filing Final Reports.............................................................................................11 2.3.2 Filing a Final Report.................................................................................11 2.3.3 Withdrawing a Report...............................................................................12 2.4 Upload XML
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/realaudio/tr062402.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/realaudio/tr062402.txt
                        • Commissioners, it is an honor to participate in these historic proceedings. It's an honor further to speak in my capacity as successor to Dr. Everett Parker, who so eloquently addressed us on videotape this morning. I serve as director of the Office of Communication, Inc., of the United Church of Christ or UCC, a mainline Protestant church of more than 1.3 million members in almost 6,000 congregations in every state and Puerto Rico. I also speak to you today on behalf of the National Council of Churches, the leading organization in the movement for ecumenical cooperation among Christians in the United States. The NCC's 36 Protestant, Anglican and Orthodox member communions and denominations include more than 50 million persons in 140,000
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/realaudio/tr072904.pdf
                        • out real quickly -- if that was a major draw and it 4 is successful, I'd certainly want to do the same 5 thing. 6 MODERATOR GOLANT: Thanks, Ben. 7 MR. HOOKS: Thank you. 8 MODERATOR GOLANT: Our next speaker is 9 Michael Willner, President and CEO, Insight 10 Communications. Insight is the ninth largest cable 11 operating company, serving 1.3 million cable 12 customers living in mid-sized communities in 13 Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky and Ohio. The company 14 offers high definition TV, DVRs, video on demand, 15 two tiers of high speed Internet access, voice 16 telephony as well as standard analog video. 17 Active in industry organizations, Mr. 18 Willner recently completed two consecutive terms as 19 Chairman of
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/arch-nextel/nextel_reply040201.pdf
                        • money in convertinits systems to a low power cellular network architecture to increase capacity further.ItiThis increase in efficiency has led to much greater use of the 800 MHz spectrum. Prior to the introduction of digital technology, the entire 800 MHz SMR indust had about two million users. l1 7% Today, Nextel alone has nearly seven million usersand there are almost 1.3 million additional SMR users on these bands outside of Nextel. l3 ' The third 10 MHz license sold for "only" $1.5 billion because it was a protected license that only "small" businesses could bid upon. But bidders were rational in their substitution between licenses as "small" businesses received a 25% bidding credit for the non-protected licenses and the difference between
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/bellsouth_comment042902.pdf
                        • a function of the fact that cable companies were able to exploit their technological and regulatory advantages to gain a large number of customers before DSL providers did. 45 2002 Annual Video Programming Assessment, p. 25. The Commission estimated that AOL Time Warner had 1.4M subscribers on its own cable systems by June 2001, and that AT&T and Comcast had 1.3M and 675K, respectively, or about 2M cable modem customers on that date. 46 Id., pp. 22-23, 44, and n. 129. 47 Id., p. 44; In the Matter of Inquiry Concerning the Deployment of Advanced Telecommunications Capability to All Americans in a Reasonable and Timely Fashion, and Possible Steps To Accelerate Such Deployment Pursuant to Section 706 of the Telecommunications Act
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/comcast_appli022802.pdf
                        • multiplexed premium channels, premium pay-per-view channels, and commercial-free, compact disc-quality, music channels. Comcast's Digital Plus service, also referred to as the "digital tier," adds roughly 40 more channels similar in format to those traditionally found on the cable programming service tier (e.g., BBC America, Discovery Civilization, and other commercially supported services). Comcast began making HDTV service available to more than 1.3 million customers in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Delaware in November 2001, and plans to launch this service in additional markets. Comcast is also investing significant resources to test and deploy various other services on its state- of-the-art cable systems, including Internet-based home security systems, and personal video recording. In addition to its wholly-owned systems, Comcast owns a 30% general partnership
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/verizon_petdeny042902.pdf
                        • (Mar. 1, 2002), at . Cable Datacom News reports that, at the end of 2001, AT&T Broadband and Comcast had 1,512,000 and 948,100 broadband subscribers, respectively. Id. 29 Cable Datacom News, Despite @Home Issues, Cable Industry Posts Strong Q4 (Mar. 1, 2002), at . Cable Datacom News reports that Verizon and SBC finished 2001 with 1.2 million and 1.3 million DSL subscribers, respectively. Id. 30 Broadband Fact Report at 1 and Figure A. 10 that would result in "the loss of the healthy intermodal competition that now exists in the [broadband Internet access] market in the short term, and the loss of broadband Internet access as a potential competitor to cable television's core video business in the long term."31
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/comsat-telenor/fcc01-369.pdf
                        • 2001; Nene Foxhall, Vice President State & Civic Affairs, Continental Airlines, June 19, 2001; and Carl Wheatley, Director, GLOBALink InFlight Communications, ARINC Incorporated, June 25, 2001 (collectively Support Letters). FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION FCC 01-369 6 (Supplement to Petition to Deny), along with a motion for waiver requesting that the Commission accept its August 23, 2001 filing (Waiver Request).38 Under Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, we are authorized to grant waivers "if good cause therefor is shown."39 As interpreted by the courts, this requires that a petitioner demonstrate that "special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule and such a deviation will serve the public interest."40 The LRT Supplement to Petition to Deny largely concerns a newspaper article that has
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/echostar-directv/genmot_attb022502.pdf
                        • a mix of spot beam sizes is employed, as proposed by Rusch. In these cases the small spot beams suffer greater interference from the large spot beams unless they are given additional geographic separation. The Rusch design does not provide this additional separation, but rather resorts to a 31 flawed interference cancellation technique that is addressed in the next section. VII.1.3 Interference Cancellation 58. Rusch rightly points out that his mix of large and small spot beams, in a contiguous spot beam array, will result in unacceptable levels of self-interference. To overcome this problem Rusch proposes the use of "... an accepted technique known as "signal nulling" or "signal cancellation." This technique involves deliberate (directional) coupling of a small part of
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/echostar-directv/wilson_resp022102.pdf
                        • FAX Nd: c I8 -Zi%b FROM: DATE: I I NUMBEROFPAGES(INCWDLNC; COVER): z-- If you do not receive all pages, please contact me at 202-225-2452. Thank you. FEB. 140 2002 4:OOPM NO.0664 P. 212 THE ELECTRIC COOPERATIV'ES OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC. . -- --... ..- . d ,' 73-e As.wc~~on of South Cudna's Conwner Owned Electric Coopemtiues Which SCWC More Than 1.3 Million Citizens . . I : ,. ; I'- `, . . 46, `, - , \ `3, ,, ._I ;., . . January 2,2002 The Honorable Joe Wilson U. S. House of Representatives 1700 Sunset Boulevard West CoIumbia, SC 29169 kL -.._,_ ---.._. ---. . . _ _ _-- _.I_ ,&-". .-. Dear Congressman Wilson: The proposed merger of
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/nbc-telemundo/exhibit6.pdf
                        • certificates representing shares of Parent Common Stock to be delivered to such Company Stockholder hereunder are to be issued. Each such Company Stockholder or its designee(s) shall be entitled to receive at the Closing cash (which shall be paid by wire transfer of immediately available funds) and/or such certificates representing whole shares (subject to Section 2.2(d)) of Parent Common Stock. 1.3 Effects of the Merger. At the Effective Time (i) the separate existence of the Company shall cease and the Company shall be merged with and into the Acquisition Subsidiary (the Acquisition Subsidiary following the Merger is sometimes referred to herein as the "Surviving Corporation"), (ii) the Certificate of Incorporation of the Acquisition Subsidiary as in effect immediately prior to the
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/nextel-motorola/nextel_exparte030801.pdf
                        • substantial money in convertinits systems to a low power cellular network architecture to increase capacity further.lfThis increase in efficiency has led to much greater use of the 800 MHz spectrum. Prior to the introduction of digital technology, the entire 800 MHz SMRindusThad about two million users. ' tToday, Nextel alone has nearly seven million users 2 and there are almost 1.3 million additional SMR users on these bands outside of Nextel. l3 9 The third 10 MHz license sold for "only" $1.5 billion because it was a protected license that only "small" businesses could bid upon. But bidders were rational in their substitution between licenses as "small" businesses received a 25% bidding credit for the non-protected licenses and the difference between
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/nextel-motorola/nextel_exparte032901.pdf
                        • power cellular network architecture to increase capacity further. 'its systems to a low This increase in efficiency has led to much greater use of the 800 MHz spectrum. Prior to the introduction of digital technology, the entire 800 MHz SMR indus million users. " 7had about two Today, Nextel alone has nearly seven million users 2 and there are almost 1.3 million additional SMR users on these bands outside of Nextel. l3 9 The third 10 MHz license sold for "only" $1.5 billion because it was a protected license that only "small" businesses could bid upon. But bidders were rational in their substitution between licenses as "small" businesses received a 25% bidding credit for the non-protected licenses and the difference between
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/nextel-pacific/appli_att2exh4.pdf
                        • in converting its systems to a low- power cellular network architecture to increase capacity further.10 This increase in efficiency has led to much greater use of the 800 MHz spectrum. Prior to the introduction of digital technology, the entire 800 MHz SMR industry had about two million users.11 Today, Nextel alone has nearly seven million users12 and there are almost 1.3 million additional SMR users on these bands outside of Nextel.13 9 The third 10 MHz license sold for "only" $1.5 billion because it was a protected license that only "small" businesses could bid upon. But bidders were rational in their substitution between licenses as "small" businesses received a 25% bidding credit for the non-protected licenses and the difference between the
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/1998PDFs/4304C98.PDF
                        • Loopallocationfactor(inpercent)thatisusedtoallocateOtherInformation Origination/TerminationEquipmentpursuanttoSection36.142(a)andtodetermine thenumberofequivalentlocalexchangesubscriberlinespursuanttoSection69.303. Foradefinitionoftheloopallocationfactor,seeSection36.154(c). 1422 OtherInformationOrigination/TerminationEquipmentthatisassociatedwithcoinless paytelephoneequipmentandisallocatedpursuanttoSection36.142(a). FCCReport43-04-Rep.Def.RowInstructions December1998 Page113of158 1423 Exchangecarrierminutes-of-useusedtoallocatecoinlesspaytelephoneequipment pursuanttoSection36.142(a). Part69Detail 1424 InvestmentinpublictelephoneequipmentthatisdirectlyassignedpursuanttoSection 69.303(a). 1425 OtherInformationOrigination/TerminationEquipmentthatisallocatedpursuantto Section69.303. 1426 NumberofequivalentlinesusedtoallocateallOtherInformation Origination/TerminationEquipmentpursuanttoSection69.303. 1427 Loopallocationfactor(inpercent)usedtodeterminethenumberofequivalentlocal exchangesubscriberlinespursuanttoSection69.303(b).Foradefinitionoftheloop allocationfactor,seeSection36.154(c)-(f)andinfrarows1456-1459. 1428 TotalCategory1,OtherInformationOrigination/TerminationEquipment,totalof Rows1419,1420,1422,1424,and1425.Exception:forColumnd,includeintotal onlyRows1419,1420,and1422. 2.Category2InformationOrigination/TerminationEquipment-NewCustomer PremisesEquipment 1430 Category2InformationOrigination/TerminationEquipmentthatisdirectlyassigned pursuanttoSection36.142(b). 1440 TotalInformationOrigination/TerminationEquipment,totalofRows1428and1430. D.CableandWireFacilities(C&WF) 1.Category1C&WF-ExchangeLineC&WF 1450 TotalnumberofworkingloopsusedtodeterminetheamountofCategory1C&WF pursuanttoSection36.154(a). 1451 NumberofworkingloopsthatareassociatedwithprivatelinesandWATSlines pursuanttoSection36.154(a). 1452 Numberofworkingloopsthatareassociatedwithsubscriberorcommonlinesthatare jointlyusedforlocalexchangeserviceandexchangeaccessforstateandinterstate interexchangeservicespursuanttoSection36.154(a). FCCReport43-04-Rep.Def.RowInstructions December1998 Page114of158 1453 AveragecostperworkingloopusedtodetermineCategory1C&WFpursuantto Section36.154(a). 1454 Categories1.1and1.2C&WFthatareassociatedwithprivatelinesandWATSlines andaredirectlyassignedpursuanttoSections36.154(a)and(b). 1455 Category1.3C&WFthatisassociatedwithsubscriberorcommonlinesthatare jointlyusedforlocalexchangeserviceandexchangeaccessforstateandinterstate interexchangeservicesandareallocatedpursuanttoSections36.154(c)-(f). 1456 Frozen1981SPF(inpercent)usedtocalculatetheallocationfactorforCategory1 C&WFpursuanttoSection36.154(e). 1457 PreviousyearadjustedtransitionalSPF(inpercent)(includinganyadjustments)used tocalculatetheallocationfactorforCategory1C&WFpursuanttoSection36.154(f). 1458 CurrentyearadjustedtransitionalSPF(inpercent)(includinganyadjustments)used tocalculatetheallocationfactorforCategory1C&WFpursuanttoSection36.154(f). 1459 Loopallocationfactor(inpresent)usedtoallocateCategory1C&WFpursuantto Section36.154(d). 1460 TotalCategory1C&WF,totalofRows1454and1455includingCategory1C&WF thatisdirectlyassignedpursuanttoSection69.304. 2.Category2C&WF-WidebandandExchangeTrunk(C&WF) a)ExchangeTrunkCategory2C&WF(Non-wideband) 1470 Non-WidebandexchangetrunkCategory2C&WFthatisassociatedwithprivatelines andWATSlinesandisdirectlyassignedpursuanttoSection36.155. 1471 Non-WidebandexchangetrunkCategory2C&WFthatisassociatedwithmessageuse andisdirectlyassignedpursuanttoSection36.155. 1472 Non-WidebandexchangetrunkCategory2C&WFthatisjointlyusedandisallocated pursuanttoSection36.155. 1473 Minutes-of-usethatareusedtoallocatenon-widebandexchangetrunkCategory2 C&WFpursuanttoSection36.155. 1474 Totalnon-widebandexchangetrunkCategory2C&WF,totalofRows1470,1471, and1472. FCCReport43-04-Rep.Def.RowInstructions December1998 Page115of158 b)WidebandCategory2C&WF 1480 WidebandCategory2C&WFthatisassociatedwithprivatelinesandWATSlines andisdirectlyassignedpursuanttoSection36.155. 1481 WidebandCategory2C&WFthatisassociatedwithmessageuseandisdirectly assignedpursuanttoSection36.155. 1482 WidebandCategory2C&WFthatisjointlyusedandisallocatedpursuanttoSection 36.155. 1483 Minutes-of-useusedtoallocatewidebandCategory2C&WFpursuanttoSection 36.155. 1484 TotalwidebandCategory2C&WFtotalofRows1480,1481,and1482. 1485 TotalCategory2C&WF,totalofRows1474and1484includingCategory2C&WF thatisdirectlyassignedpursuanttoSection69.305. 3.Category3C&WF,InterexchangeC&WF 1490 TotalcircuitkilometersthatareusedtodeterminetheamountofCategory3C&WF pursuanttoSection36.156(a). 1491
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/1998PDFs/4304P98.PDF
                        • Loopallocationfactor(inpercent)thatisusedtoallocateOtherInformation Origination/TerminationEquipmentpursuanttoSection36.142(a)andtodetermine thenumberofequivalentlocalexchangesubscriberlinespursuanttoSection69.303. Foradefinitionoftheloopallocationfactor,seeSection36.154(c). 1422 OtherInformationOrigination/TerminationEquipmentthatisassociatedwithcoinless paytelephoneequipmentandisallocatedpursuanttoSection36.142(a). FCCReport43-04-Rep.Def.RowInstructions December1998 Page113of158 1423 Exchangecarrierminutes-of-useusedtoallocatecoinlesspaytelephoneequipment pursuanttoSection36.142(a). Part69Detail 1424 InvestmentinpublictelephoneequipmentthatisdirectlyassignedpursuanttoSection 69.303(a). 1425 OtherInformationOrigination/TerminationEquipmentthatisallocatedpursuantto Section69.303. 1426 NumberofequivalentlinesusedtoallocateallOtherInformation Origination/TerminationEquipmentpursuanttoSection69.303. 1427 Loopallocationfactor(inpercent)usedtodeterminethenumberofequivalentlocal exchangesubscriberlinespursuanttoSection69.303(b).Foradefinitionoftheloop allocationfactor,seeSection36.154(c)-(f)andinfrarows1456-1459. 1428 TotalCategory1,OtherInformationOrigination/TerminationEquipment,totalof Rows1419,1420,1422,1424,and1425.Exception:forColumnd,includeintotal onlyRows1419,1420,and1422. 2.Category2InformationOrigination/TerminationEquipment-NewCustomer PremisesEquipment 1430 Category2InformationOrigination/TerminationEquipmentthatisdirectlyassigned pursuanttoSection36.142(b). 1440 TotalInformationOrigination/TerminationEquipment,totalofRows1428and1430. D.CableandWireFacilities(C&WF) 1.Category1C&WF-ExchangeLineC&WF 1450 TotalnumberofworkingloopsusedtodeterminetheamountofCategory1C&WF pursuanttoSection36.154(a). 1451 NumberofworkingloopsthatareassociatedwithprivatelinesandWATSlines pursuanttoSection36.154(a). 1452 Numberofworkingloopsthatareassociatedwithsubscriberorcommonlinesthatare jointlyusedforlocalexchangeserviceandexchangeaccessforstateandinterstate interexchangeservicespursuanttoSection36.154(a). FCCReport43-04-Rep.Def.RowInstructions December1998 Page114of158 1453 AveragecostperworkingloopusedtodetermineCategory1C&WFpursuantto Section36.154(a). 1454 Categories1.1and1.2C&WFthatareassociatedwithprivatelinesandWATSlines andaredirectlyassignedpursuanttoSections36.154(a)and(b). 1455 Category1.3C&WFthatisassociatedwithsubscriberorcommonlinesthatare jointlyusedforlocalexchangeserviceandexchangeaccessforstateandinterstate interexchangeservicesandareallocatedpursuanttoSections36.154(c)-(f). 1456 Frozen1981SPF(inpercent)usedtocalculatetheallocationfactorforCategory1 C&WFpursuanttoSection36.154(e). 1457 PreviousyearadjustedtransitionalSPF(inpercent)(includinganyadjustments)used tocalculatetheallocationfactorforCategory1C&WFpursuanttoSection36.154(f). 1458 CurrentyearadjustedtransitionalSPF(inpercent)(includinganyadjustments)used tocalculatetheallocationfactorforCategory1C&WFpursuanttoSection36.154(f). 1459 Loopallocationfactor(inpresent)usedtoallocateCategory1C&WFpursuantto Section36.154(d). 1460 TotalCategory1C&WF,totalofRows1454and1455includingCategory1C&WF thatisdirectlyassignedpursuanttoSection69.304. 2.Category2C&WF-WidebandandExchangeTrunk(C&WF) a)ExchangeTrunkCategory2C&WF(Non-wideband) 1470 Non-WidebandexchangetrunkCategory2C&WFthatisassociatedwithprivatelines andWATSlinesandisdirectlyassignedpursuanttoSection36.155. 1471 Non-WidebandexchangetrunkCategory2C&WFthatisassociatedwithmessageuse andisdirectlyassignedpursuanttoSection36.155. 1472 Non-WidebandexchangetrunkCategory2C&WFthatisjointlyusedandisallocated pursuanttoSection36.155. 1473 Minutes-of-usethatareusedtoallocatenon-widebandexchangetrunkCategory2 C&WFpursuanttoSection36.155. 1474 Totalnon-widebandexchangetrunkCategory2C&WF,totalofRows1470,1471, and1472. FCCReport43-04-Rep.Def.RowInstructions December1998 Page115of158 b)WidebandCategory2C&WF 1480 WidebandCategory2C&WFthatisassociatedwithprivatelinesandWATSlines andisdirectlyassignedpursuanttoSection36.155. 1481 WidebandCategory2C&WFthatisassociatedwithmessageuseandisdirectly assignedpursuanttoSection36.155. 1482 WidebandCategory2C&WFthatisjointlyusedandisallocatedpursuanttoSection 36.155. 1483 Minutes-of-useusedtoallocatewidebandCategory2C&WFpursuanttoSection 36.155. 1484 TotalwidebandCategory2C&WFtotalofRows1480,1481,and1482. 1485 TotalCategory2C&WF,totalofRows1474and1484includingCategory2C&WF thatisdirectlyassignedpursuanttoSection69.305. 3.Category3C&WF,InterexchangeC&WF 1490 TotalcircuitkilometersthatareusedtodeterminetheamountofCategory3C&WF pursuanttoSection36.156(a). 1491
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/1998PDFs/4304PF98.PDF
                        • Loopallocationfactor(inpercent)thatisusedtoallocateOtherInformation Origination/TerminationEquipmentpursuanttoSection36.142(a)andtodetermine thenumberofequivalentlocalexchangesubscriberlinespursuanttoSection69.303. Foradefinitionoftheloopallocationfactor,seeSection36.154(c). 1422 OtherInformationOrigination/TerminationEquipmentthatisassociatedwithcoinless paytelephoneequipmentandisallocatedpursuanttoSection36.142(a). FCCReport43-04-Rep.Def.RowInstructions December1998 Page113of158 1423 Exchangecarrierminutes-of-useusedtoallocatecoinlesspaytelephoneequipment pursuanttoSection36.142(a). Part69Detail 1424 InvestmentinpublictelephoneequipmentthatisdirectlyassignedpursuanttoSection 69.303(a). 1425 OtherInformationOrigination/TerminationEquipmentthatisallocatedpursuantto Section69.303. 1426 NumberofequivalentlinesusedtoallocateallOtherInformation Origination/TerminationEquipmentpursuanttoSection69.303. 1427 Loopallocationfactor(inpercent)usedtodeterminethenumberofequivalentlocal exchangesubscriberlinespursuanttoSection69.303(b).Foradefinitionoftheloop allocationfactor,seeSection36.154(c)-(f)andinfrarows1456-1459. 1428 TotalCategory1,OtherInformationOrigination/TerminationEquipment,totalof Rows1419,1420,1422,1424,and1425.Exception:forColumnd,includeintotal onlyRows1419,1420,and1422. 2.Category2InformationOrigination/TerminationEquipment-NewCustomer PremisesEquipment 1430 Category2InformationOrigination/TerminationEquipmentthatisdirectlyassigned pursuanttoSection36.142(b). 1440 TotalInformationOrigination/TerminationEquipment,totalofRows1428and1430. D.CableandWireFacilities(C&WF) 1.Category1C&WF-ExchangeLineC&WF 1450 TotalnumberofworkingloopsusedtodeterminetheamountofCategory1C&WF pursuanttoSection36.154(a). 1451 NumberofworkingloopsthatareassociatedwithprivatelinesandWATSlines pursuanttoSection36.154(a). 1452 Numberofworkingloopsthatareassociatedwithsubscriberorcommonlinesthatare jointlyusedforlocalexchangeserviceandexchangeaccessforstateandinterstate interexchangeservicespursuanttoSection36.154(a). FCCReport43-04-Rep.Def.RowInstructions December1998 Page114of158 1453 AveragecostperworkingloopusedtodetermineCategory1C&WFpursuantto Section36.154(a). 1454 Categories1.1and1.2C&WFthatareassociatedwithprivatelinesandWATSlines andaredirectlyassignedpursuanttoSections36.154(a)and(b). 1455 Category1.3C&WFthatisassociatedwithsubscriberorcommonlinesthatare jointlyusedforlocalexchangeserviceandexchangeaccessforstateandinterstate interexchangeservicesandareallocatedpursuanttoSections36.154(c)-(f). 1456 Frozen1981SPF(inpercent)usedtocalculatetheallocationfactorforCategory1 C&WFpursuanttoSection36.154(e). 1457 PreviousyearadjustedtransitionalSPF(inpercent)(includinganyadjustments)used tocalculatetheallocationfactorforCategory1C&WFpursuanttoSection36.154(f). 1458 CurrentyearadjustedtransitionalSPF(inpercent)(includinganyadjustments)used tocalculatetheallocationfactorforCategory1C&WFpursuanttoSection36.154(f). 1459 Loopallocationfactor(inpresent)usedtoallocateCategory1C&WFpursuantto Section36.154(d). 1460 TotalCategory1C&WF,totalofRows1454and1455includingCategory1C&WF thatisdirectlyassignedpursuanttoSection69.304. 2.Category2C&WF-WidebandandExchangeTrunk(C&WF) a)ExchangeTrunkCategory2C&WF(Non-wideband) 1470 Non-WidebandexchangetrunkCategory2C&WFthatisassociatedwithprivatelines andWATSlinesandisdirectlyassignedpursuanttoSection36.155. 1471 Non-WidebandexchangetrunkCategory2C&WFthatisassociatedwithmessageuse andisdirectlyassignedpursuanttoSection36.155. 1472 Non-WidebandexchangetrunkCategory2C&WFthatisjointlyusedandisallocated pursuanttoSection36.155. 1473 Minutes-of-usethatareusedtoallocatenon-widebandexchangetrunkCategory2 C&WFpursuanttoSection36.155. 1474 Totalnon-widebandexchangetrunkCategory2C&WF,totalofRows1470,1471, and1472. FCCReport43-04-Rep.Def.RowInstructions December1998 Page115of158 b)WidebandCategory2C&WF 1480 WidebandCategory2C&WFthatisassociatedwithprivatelinesandWATSlines andisdirectlyassignedpursuanttoSection36.155. 1481 WidebandCategory2C&WFthatisassociatedwithmessageuseandisdirectly assignedpursuanttoSection36.155. 1482 WidebandCategory2C&WFthatisjointlyusedandisallocatedpursuanttoSection 36.155. 1483 Minutes-of-useusedtoallocatewidebandCategory2C&WFpursuanttoSection 36.155. 1484 TotalwidebandCategory2C&WFtotalofRows1480,1481,and1482. 1485 TotalCategory2C&WF,totalofRows1474and1484includingCategory2C&WF thatisdirectlyassignedpursuanttoSection69.305. 3.Category3C&WF,InterexchangeC&WF 1490 TotalcircuitkilometersthatareusedtodeterminetheamountofCategory3C&WF pursuanttoSection36.156(a). 1491
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/1999PDFs/4304C99.PDF
                        • for local exchange service and exchange access for state and interstate interexchange services pursuant to Section 36.154(a). 1453 Average cost per working loop used to determine Category 1 C&WF pursuant to Section 36.154(a). 1454 Categories 1.1 and 1.2 C&WF that are associated with private lines and WATS lines and are directly assigned pursuant to Sections 36.154(a) and (b). 1455 Category 1.3 C&WF that is associated with subscriber or common lines that are jointly used for local exchange service and exchange access for state and interstate interexchange services and are allocated pursuant to Sections 36.154(c)-(f). 1456 Frozen 1981 SPF (in percent) used to calculate the allocation factor for Category 1 C&WF data not required. Enter "N/A." 1457 Previous year adjusted transitional SPF
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/1999PDFs/4304P99.PDF
                        • for local exchange service and exchange access for state and interstate interexchange services pursuant to Section 36.154(a). 1453 Average cost per working loop used to determine Category 1 C&WF pursuant to Section 36.154(a). 1454 Categories 1.1 and 1.2 C&WF that are associated with private lines and WATS lines and are directly assigned pursuant to Sections 36.154(a) and (b). 1455 Category 1.3 C&WF that is associated with subscriber or common lines that are jointly used for local exchange service and exchange access for state and interstate interexchange services and are allocated pursuant to Sections 36.154(c)-(f). 1456 Frozen 1981 SPF (in percent) used to calculate the allocation factor for Category 1 C&WF data not required. Enter "N/A." 1457 Previous year adjusted transitional SPF
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/2000PDFs/4304C00.PDF
                        • Section 36.154(a). 1453 Average cost per working loop used to determine Category 1 C&WF pursuant to Section 36.154(a). FCC Report 43-04 � Rep. Def. - Instructions December 2000 Page 80 of 121 . 1454 Categories 1.1 and 1.2 C&WF that are associated with private lines and WATS lines and are directly assigned pursuant to Sections 36.154(a) and (b). 1455 Category 1.3 C&WF that is associated with subscriber or common lines that are jointly used for local exchange service and exchange access for state and interstate interexchange services and are allocated pursuant to Sections 36.154(c)-(f). 1459 Loop allocation factor (in present) used to allocate Category 1 C&WF pursuant to Section 36.154(d). 1460 Total Category 1 C&WF, total of Rows 1454 and 1455
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/2000PDFs/4304P00.PDF
                        • Section 36.154(a). 1453 Average cost per working loop used to determine Category 1 C&WF pursuant to Section 36.154(a). FCC Report 43-04 � Rep. Def. - Instructions December 2000 Page 80 of 121 . 1454 Categories 1.1 and 1.2 C&WF that are associated with private lines and WATS lines and are directly assigned pursuant to Sections 36.154(a) and (b). 1455 Category 1.3 C&WF that is associated with subscriber or common lines that are jointly used for local exchange service and exchange access for state and interstate interexchange services and are allocated pursuant to Sections 36.154(c)-(f). 1459 Loop allocation factor (in present) used to allocate Category 1 C&WF pursuant to Section 36.154(d). 1460 Total Category 1 C&WF, total of Rows 1454 and 1455
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/2001PDFs/4304C01.PDF
                        • in total only Rows 1420. 1430 Category 2 Information Origination/Termination Equipment that is directly assigned pursuant to Section 36.142(c). 1440 Total Information Origination/Termination Equipment, total of Rows 1428 and 1430. Cable and Wire Facilities (C&WF) 1454 Categories 1.1 and 1.2 Exchange Linethat are associated with private lines and WATS lines and are directly assigned pursuant to Section 36.154(g). 1455 Category 1.3 Exchange Line that is associated with subscriber or common lines that are jointly used for local exchange service and exchange access for state and interstate interexchange services and are allocated pursuant to Sections 36.154(g). 1460 Total Category 1Exchange Line, total of Rows 1454 and 1455, including Category 1 Exchange Line that is directly assigned pursuant to Section 69.304. FCC Report
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/2002PDFs/4304c02.pdf
                        • assigned pursuant to Section 36.142(c). 1440 Total Information Origination/Termination Equipment, total of Rows 1428 and 1430. Cable and Wire Facilities (C&WF) 1454 Categories 1.1 and 1.2 Exchange Line that are associated with private lines and WATS lines and are directly assigned pursuant to Section 36.154(g). FCC Report 43-04 � Report Definition December 2002 Page 17 of 32 . 1455 Category 1.3 Exchange Line that is associated with subscriber or common lines that are jointly used for local exchange service and exchange access for state and interstate interexchange services and are allocated pursuant to Sections 36.154(g). 1460 Total Category 1 Exchange Line, total of Rows 1454 and 1455, including Category 1 Exchange Line that is directly assigned pursuant to Section 69.304. 1470
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/2002PDFs/4304p02.pdf
                        • assigned pursuant to Section 36.142(c). 1440 Total Information Origination/Termination Equipment, total of Rows 1428 and 1430. Cable and Wire Facilities (C&WF) 1454 Categories 1.1 and 1.2 Exchange Line that are associated with private lines and WATS lines and are directly assigned pursuant to Section 36.154(g). FCC Report 43-04 � Report Definition December 2002 Page 17 of 32 . 1455 Category 1.3 Exchange Line that is associated with subscriber or common lines that are jointly used for local exchange service and exchange access for state and interstate interexchange services and are allocated pursuant to Sections 36.154(g). 1460 Total Category 1 Exchange Line, total of Rows 1454 and 1455, including Category 1 Exchange Line that is directly assigned pursuant to Section 69.304. 1470
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/2003PDFs/4304c03.pdf
                        • total only Rows 1420. 1430 Category 2 Information Origination/Termination Equipment that is directly assigned pursuant to Section 36.142(c). 1440 Total Information Origination/Termination Equipment, total of Rows 1428 and 1430. Cable and Wire Facilities (C&WF) 1454 Categories 1.1 and 1.2 Exchange Line that are associated with private lines and WATS lines and are directly assigned pursuant to Section 36.154(g). 1455 Category 1.3 Exchange Line that is associated with subscriber or common lines that are jointly used for local exchange service and exchange access for state and interstate interexchange services and are allocated pursuant to Sections 36.154(g). 1460 Total Category 1 Exchange Line, total of Rows 1454 and 1455, including Category 1 Exchange Line that is directly assigned pursuant to Section 69.304. 1470
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/2003PDFs/4304p03.pdf
                        • total only Rows 1420. 1430 Category 2 Information Origination/Termination Equipment that is directly assigned pursuant to Section 36.142(c). 1440 Total Information Origination/Termination Equipment, total of Rows 1428 and 1430. Cable and Wire Facilities (C&WF) 1454 Categories 1.1 and 1.2 Exchange Line that are associated with private lines and WATS lines and are directly assigned pursuant to Section 36.154(g). 1455 Category 1.3 Exchange Line that is associated with subscriber or common lines that are jointly used for local exchange service and exchange access for state and interstate interexchange services and are allocated pursuant to Sections 36.154(g). 1460 Total Category 1 Exchange Line, total of Rows 1454 and 1455, including Category 1 Exchange Line that is directly assigned pursuant to Section 69.304. 1470
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/2004PDFs/4304c04.pdf
                        • total only Rows 1420. 1430 Category 2 Information Origination/Termination Equipment that is directly assigned pursuant to Section 36.142(c). 1440 Total Information Origination/Termination Equipment, total of Rows 1428 and 1430. Cable and Wire Facilities (C&WF) 1454 Categories 1.1 and 1.2 Exchange Line that are associated with private lines and WATS lines and are directly assigned pursuant to Section 36.154(g). 1455 Category 1.3 Exchange Line that is associated with subscriber or common lines that are jointly used for local exchange service and exchange access for state and interstate interexchange services and are allocated pursuant to Sections 36.154(g). 1460 Total Category 1 Exchange Line, total of Rows 1454 and 1455, including Category 1 Exchange Line that is directly assigned pursuant to Section 69.304. 1470
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/2004PDFs/4304p04.pdf
                        • total only Rows 1420. 1430 Category 2 Information Origination/Termination Equipment that is directly assigned pursuant to Section 36.142(c). 1440 Total Information Origination/Termination Equipment, total of Rows 1428 and 1430. Cable and Wire Facilities (C&WF) 1454 Categories 1.1 and 1.2 Exchange Line that are associated with private lines and WATS lines and are directly assigned pursuant to Section 36.154(g). 1455 Category 1.3 Exchange Line that is associated with subscriber or common lines that are jointly used for local exchange service and exchange access for state and interstate interexchange services and are allocated pursuant to Sections 36.154(g). 1460 Total Category 1 Exchange Line, total of Rows 1454 and 1455, including Category 1 Exchange Line that is directly assigned pursuant to Section 69.304. 1470
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/2005PDFs/4304c05.pdf
                        • total only Rows 1420. 1430 Category 2 Information Origination/Termination Equipment that is directly assigned pursuant to Section 36.142(c). 1440 Total Information Origination/Termination Equipment, total of Rows 1428 and 1430. Cable and Wire Facilities (C&WF) 1454 Categories 1.1 and 1.2 Exchange Line that are associated with private lines and WATS lines and are directly assigned pursuant to Section 36.154(g). 1455 Category 1.3 Exchange Line that is associated with subscriber or common lines that are jointly used for local exchange service and exchange access for state and interstate interexchange services and are allocated pursuant to Sections 36.154(g). 1460 Total Category 1 Exchange Line, total of Rows 1454 and 1455, including Category 1 Exchange Line that is directly assigned pursuant to Section 69.304. 1470
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/2005PDFs/4304p05.pdf
                        • total only Rows 1420. 1430 Category 2 Information Origination/Termination Equipment that is directly assigned pursuant to Section 36.142(c). 1440 Total Information Origination/Termination Equipment, total of Rows 1428 and 1430. Cable and Wire Facilities (C&WF) 1454 Categories 1.1 and 1.2 Exchange Line that are associated with private lines and WATS lines and are directly assigned pursuant to Section 36.154(g). 1455 Category 1.3 Exchange Line that is associated with subscriber or common lines that are jointly used for local exchange service and exchange access for state and interstate interexchange services and are allocated pursuant to Sections 36.154(g). 1460 Total Category 1 Exchange Line, total of Rows 1454 and 1455, including Category 1 Exchange Line that is directly assigned pursuant to Section 69.304. 1470
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/2006PDFs/4304c06.pdf
                        • total only Rows 1420. 1430 Category 2 Information Origination/Termination Equipment that is directly assigned pursuant to Section 36.142(c). 1440 Total Information Origination/Termination Equipment, total of Rows 1428 and 1430. Cable and Wire Facilities (C&WF) 1454 Categories 1.1 and 1.2 Exchange Line that are associated with private lines and WATS lines and are directly assigned pursuant to Section 36.154(g). 1455 Category 1.3 Exchange Line that is associated with subscriber or common lines that are jointly used for local exchange service and exchange access for state and interstate interexchange services and are allocated pursuant to Sections 36.154(g). 1460 Total Category 1 Exchange Line, total of Rows 1454 and 1455, including Category 1 Exchange Line that is directly assigned pursuant to Section 69.304. 1470
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/2006PDFs/4304p06.pdf
                        • total only Rows 1420. 1430 Category 2 Information Origination/Termination Equipment that is directly assigned pursuant to Section 36.142(c). 1440 Total Information Origination/Termination Equipment, total of Rows 1428 and 1430. Cable and Wire Facilities (C&WF) 1454 Categories 1.1 and 1.2 Exchange Line that are associated with private lines and WATS lines and are directly assigned pursuant to Section 36.154(g). 1455 Category 1.3 Exchange Line that is associated with subscriber or common lines that are jointly used for local exchange service and exchange access for state and interstate interexchange services and are allocated pursuant to Sections 36.154(g). 1460 Total Category 1 Exchange Line, total of Rows 1454 and 1455, including Category 1 Exchange Line that is directly assigned pursuant to Section 69.304. 1470
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/2007PDFs/4304c07.pdf
                        • total only Rows 1420. 1430 Category 2 Information Origination/Termination Equipment that is directly assigned pursuant to Section 36.142(c). 1440 Total Information Origination/Termination Equipment, total of Rows 1428 and 1430. Cable and Wire Facilities (C&WF) 1454 Categories 1.1 and 1.2 Exchange Line that are associated with private lines and WATS lines and are directly assigned pursuant to Section 36.154(g). 1455 Category 1.3 Exchange Line that is associated with subscriber or common lines that are jointly used for local exchange service and exchange access for state and interstate interexchange services and are allocated pursuant to Sections 36.154(g). 1460 Total Category 1 Exchange Line, total of Rows 1454 and 1455, including Category 1 Exchange Line that is directly assigned pursuant to Section 69.304. 1470
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/2007PDFs/4304p07.pdf
                        • total only Rows 1420. 1430 Category 2 Information Origination/Termination Equipment that is directly assigned pursuant to Section 36.142(c). 1440 Total Information Origination/Termination Equipment, total of Rows 1428 and 1430. Cable and Wire Facilities (C&WF) 1454 Categories 1.1 and 1.2 Exchange Line that are associated with private lines and WATS lines and are directly assigned pursuant to Section 36.154(g). 1455 Category 1.3 Exchange Line that is associated with subscriber or common lines that are jointly used for local exchange service and exchange access for state and interstate interexchange services and are allocated pursuant to Sections 36.154(g). 1460 Total Category 1 Exchange Line, total of Rows 1454 and 1455, including Category 1 Exchange Line that is directly assigned pursuant to Section 69.304. 1470
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/aad_92_42_moorder_da_93_765.pdf
                        • cost pools.)) 20. Discussion. We have decided to adopt our proposal that building costs be assigned to the various functions based on floor space studies that are to be updated at least annually because we believe this is necessary to achieve 28 4; C.F .R. �32.4Q9q(1). 29 4; C.F .R. �32.23(c). 30 USTA Comments at II: Bell Atlantic Comments at 1.3-4: CBT Comments at 2: NYNEX Comments at 7: Pacific Com- ments at 8-9: United Comments at 5: U S West Comments at 7-8. 3\ See Expanded Interconnections with Local Telephone Facili- ties: 23 FCC Rcd 7369 (19(j2). 32 BellSouth Comments at 11-12. 33 GTE Comments at 8-(j. 23 USTA Comments at 12: Bell Atlantic Comments at 4: CBT Comments at
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/armis/documents/order_da_91_143.pdf
                        • N/A I N/A I 1 1 I I I I 1 I I 50 'Tot Res' Def 36/6~1 N/A 1 II N/A IN/A 1 IN/AI 51 INet EA Inv 36/69 I N/A I I I N/A I N/A I I N/A I Nov.~r 1990 Page 3 of 90 Approved by OMB 3060-0395 Bxpire.10/31/92 xxxxxxxxxxxx VERSION SUBMISSION X TABLIC I PAGE 1.3 OF 30.3 FCC Report 43-04 -Report Definition -Form FCC REPORT 43-04 ARMIS ACCESS REPORT COMPANY I STUDY AREA I PERIOD I COSAI xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxzz xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxzx From -yyyy To -yyyy xxx:: TABLB I -SEPARATIONS A8ID ACCBSS 7ABL8 (Doll.r. in Thou.and.) I I Total I Billing' I I I .Category I Acce.. I Collection I IX I Row I {a} I {D} I
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/cpd/Nanc/toreport.doc
                        • LNPA Selection Working Group meeting the LNPA Architecture and LNPA Technical & Operational Requirements (T&O) Task Forces were formed to begin addressing these overall responsibilities. The LNPA T&O Task Force was directed to satisfy item F above, develop technical standards, network interface standards and technical specifications. This report describes the process the T&O Task Force used to satisfy this requirement. 1.3 The LNPA T&O Task Force interpreted this responsibility to include maintaining and updating these standards going forward and establishing a long term compliance process for Service Providers (SP) and Number Portability Administration Centers (NPACs). 2. MISSION STATEMENT 2.1 In support of the LNPA T&O Task Force responsibilities the following mission statement was developed: Develop initial and future NPAC SMS technical
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/cpd/Nanc/wknggrp.doc
                        • preceded formation of the Working Group were reviewed and compared to recommended national selection criteria to determine the adequacy of the selection process. 1.2 The activities of the Working Group and associated Task Forces focused primarily on the wireline segment of the industry, therefore a brief section (see Section 3) regarding potential issues involving wireless number portability follows the Introduction. 1.3 The LNPA Vendor Selection section (see Section 4) defines in some detail the criteria governing the selection process followed by a description of the actual process including an example of the neutrality requirement placed on LNPA vendors. Also included is a discussion of limited liability companies (LLCs) formation and the LLC processes designed to maintain competitive neutrality. The LLC discussion
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/cpd/archive/2004ord.html
                        • Declaratory Ruling. MO&O: [557]Word | [558]Acrobat Powell Statement: [559]Word | [560]Acrobat Abernathy Statement: [561]Word | [562]Acrobat Copps Statement: [563]Word | [564]Acrobat Martin Statement: [565]Word | [566]Acrobat Adelstein Statement: [567]Word | [568]Acrobat 2/18/04 PUBLIC NOTICE: Re: Pleading Cycle established for comments on BellSouth's Petition for Waiver, DA-04-404, Dkt. Nos. 01-338, 96-98, 98-147. BellSouth filed a petition for waiver, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, seeking a temporary waiver of its obligation to provide certain unbundled network elements (UNEs) under the Commission's eligibility requirements. [569]Acrobat | [570]Word 2/18/04 PUBLIC NOTICE: Re: Notice of Streamlined Domestic Section 214 Application Granted. DA-04-405. Dkt no. 04-01. [571]Acrobat | [572]Word 2/17/04 PUBLIC NOTICE: Re: Domestic Section 214 Application Filed for Transfer of Control of TXU
                      • http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/cpd/numbering/archives/numberingresourcesarchive05.html
                        • Brown, staff attorney, Telecommunication Access Policy Division, to serve as the Designated Federal Officer to FCC's federal advisory committee. CC Docket Nos. 92-237 and 99-200. DA 05-1266. [43]Word | [44]Acrobat 4/26/05 PUBLIC NOTICE: Inviting parties to refresh the record regarding issues raised on the two CIC per entity limit and the definition of the term "entity" as found in Section 1.3 of the CIC Assignment Guidelines, in the FNPRM in the Carrier Identification Code (CIC) docket, CC Docket No. 92-237. DA 05-1154. [45]Word | [46]Acrobat 3/14/05 6th R&O: Implementing the Pipeline Safety Act, which provides for the establishment of a nationwide toll-free abbreviated dialing arrangement to be used by state One Call notification systems. FCC 05-59. CC DKT 92-105. [47]Word |