FCC Web Documents citing 1.413

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2812A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2812A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2812A1.txt
  • a Memorandum Opinion and Order granting Alcatel USA, Inc., (Alcatel) a waiver of Section 68.308(e)(1) of the Commission's rules for a similar ADSL modem. The Commission granted the waiver subject to two conditions (Alcatel conditions), which were corrected by erratum to read as follows: the ADSL modem must (1) meet the transmitter spectral response requirements specified in Section 7.14 of T1.413- Issue Two (1998), and (2) operate with an aggregate power of less than 12.5 dBm over the range 25.875 to 138 kHz as specified in Section 7.15 of the same document. 5. The Alcatel Waiver Order additionally established a streamlined process for Part 68 waivers of ADSL modems, eliminating the usual public notice and comment procedures if a petitioner certifies
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2921A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2921A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2921A1.txt
  • ADSL equipment in Alcatel USA, Inc. Petition for Waiver of the Signal Power Limitations Contained in Section 68.308(e)(1) of the Commission's Rules, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 4388 (2000) (Alcatel Waiver Order). In the Alcatel Waiver Order, the Commission determined that if a petitioner shows that an ADSL device meets two performance conditions set out in ANSI standard T1.413, it is in the public interest to grant a waiver of rule 308(e)(1). Elastic contends that compliance with the dpANS standard should be an alternative basis for the Commission to waive section 68.308(e)(1). Although the dpANS standards document has not been finalized, Elastic Networks claims that industry consensus for it is high, and that industry expects T1E1.4 to issue the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1039A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1039A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1039A1.txt
  • released a Memorandum Opinion and Order granting Alcatel USA, Inc., (Alcatel) a waiver of Section 68.308(e)(1) of the Commission's rules for its ADSL modem. The Commission granted the waiver subject to two conditions (Alcatel conditions), which were corrected by erratum to read as follows: the ADSL modem must (1) meet the transmitter spectral response requirements specified in Section 7.14 of T1.413- Issue Two (1998), and (2) operate with an aggregate power of less than 12.5 dBm over the range 25.875 to 138 kHz as specified in Section 7.15 of the same document. 5. The Alcatel Waiver Order additionally established a streamlined process for Part 68 waivers of ADSL modems, eliminating the usual public notice and comment procedures if a petitioner certifies
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1243A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1243A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1243A1.txt
  • released a Memorandum Opinion and Order granting Alcatel USA, Inc., (Alcatel) a waiver of Section 68.308(e)(1) of the Commission's rules for its ADSL modem. The Commission granted the waiver subject to two conditions (Alcatel conditions), which were corrected by erratum to read as follows: the ADSL modem must (1) meet the transmitter spectral response requirements specified in Section 7.14 of T1.413- Issue Two (1998), and (2) operate with an aggregate power of less than 12.5 dBm over the range 25.875 to 138 kHz as specified in Section 7.15 of the same document. 5. The Alcatel Waiver Order additionally established a streamlined process for Part 68 waivers of ADSL modems, eliminating the usual public notice and comment procedures if a petitioner certifies
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1606A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1606A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1606A1.txt
  • released a Memorandum Opinion and Order granting Alcatel USA, Inc., (Alcatel) a waiver of Section 68.308(e)(1) of the Commission's rules for its ADSL modem. The Bureau granted the waiver subject to two conditions (Alcatel conditions), which were corrected by erratum to read as follows: the ADSL modem must (1) meet the transmitter spectral response requirements specified in Section 7.14 of T1.413- Issue Two (1998), and (2) operate with an aggregate power of less than 12.5 dBm over the range 25.875 to 138 kHz as specified in Section 7.15 of the same document. 5. The Alcatel Waiver Order additionally established a streamlined process for Part 68 waivers of ADSL modems, eliminating the usual public notice and comment procedures if a petitioner certifies
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-167A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-167A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-167A1.txt
  • a Memorandum Opinion and Order granting Alcatel USA, Inc., (Alcatel) a waiver of Section 68.308(e)(1) of the Commission's rules for a similar ADSL modem. The Commission granted the waiver subject to two conditions (Alcatel conditions), which were corrected by erratum to read as follows: the ADSL modem must (1) meet the transmitter spectral response requirements specified in Section 7.14 of T1.413- Issue Two (1998), and (2) operate with an aggregate power of less than 12.5 dBm over the range 25.875 to 138 kHz as specified in Section 7.15 of the same document. 5. The Alcatel Waiver Order additionally established a streamlined process for Part 68 waivers of ADSL modems, eliminating the usual public notice and comment procedures if a petitioner certifies
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1704A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1704A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1704A1.txt
  • compliant with section 68.308(e)(1), would not cause harm to the PSTN because it complies with the ANSI T1.417 standard. Elastic also notes that the Commission established a streamlined waiver process for ADSL equipment in the Alcatel Order. In that order, the Commission determined that, if a petitioner shows that an ADSL device meets two performance conditions established in ANSI standard T1.413, then it is in the public interest to grant a waiver of section 308(e)(1). Elastic contends that compliance with ANSI standard T1.417 should be an alternate basis for the Commission to waive the same rule. Discussion The issues raised by Elastic's Petition are similar to those raised in other petitions seeking waiver of the Commission's rules in Part 68. Based
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1801A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1801A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1801A1.txt
  • released a Memorandum Opinion and Order granting Alcatel USA, Inc., (Alcatel) a waiver of Section 68.308(e)(1) of the Commission's rules for its ADSL modem. The Bureau granted the waiver subject to two conditions (Alcatel conditions), which were corrected by erratum to read as follows: the ADSL modem must (1) meet the transmitter spectral response requirements specified in Section 7.14 of T1.413- Issue Two (1998), and (2) operate with an aggregate power of less than 12.5 dBm over the range 25.875 to 138 kHz as specified in Section 7.15 of the same document. 5. The Alcatel Waiver Order additionally established a streamlined process for Part 68 waivers of ADSL modems, eliminating the usual public notice and comment procedures if a petitioner certifies
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-304A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-304A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-304A1.txt
  • a Memorandum Opinion and Order granting Alcatel USA, Inc., (Alcatel) a waiver of Section 68.308(e)(1) of the Commission's rules for a similar ADSL modem. The Commission granted the waiver subject to two conditions (Alcatel conditions), which were corrected by erratum to read as follows: the ADSL modem must (1) meet the transmitter spectral response requirements specified in Section 7.14 of T1.413- Issue Two (1998), and (2) operate with an aggregate power of less than 12.5 dBm over the range 25.875 to 138 kHz as specified in Section 7.15 of the same document. 5. The Alcatel Waiver Order additionally established a streamlined process for Part 68 waivers of ADSL modems, eliminating the usual public notice and comment procedures if a petitioner certifies
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-471A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-471A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-471A1.txt
  • a Memorandum Opinion and Order granting Alcatel USA, Inc., (Alcatel) a waiver of Section 68.308(e)(1) of the Commission's rules for a similar ADSL modem. The Commission granted the waiver subject to two conditions (Alcatel conditions), which were corrected by erratum to read as follows: the ADSL modem must (1) meet the transmitter spectral response requirements specified in Section 7.14 of T1.413- Issue Two (1998), and (2) operate with an aggregate power of less than 12.5 dBm over the range 25.875 to 138 kHz as specified in Section 7.15 of the same document. 5. The Alcatel Waiver Order additionally established a streamlined process for Part 68 waivers of ADSL modems, eliminating the usual public notice and comment procedures if a petitioner certifies
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-695A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-695A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-695A1.txt
  • a Memorandum Opinion and Order granting Alcatel USA, Inc., (Alcatel) a waiver of Section 68.308(e)(1) of the Commission's rules for a similar ADSL modem. The Commission granted the waiver subject to two conditions (Alcatel conditions), which were corrected by erratum to read as follows: the ADSL modem must (1) meet the transmitter spectral response requirements specified in Section 7.14 of T1.413- Issue Two (1998), and (2) operate with an aggregate power of less than 12.5 dBm over the range 25.875 to 138 kHz as specified in Section 7.15 of the same document. 5. The Alcatel Waiver Order additionally established a streamlined process for Part 68 waivers of ADSL modems, eliminating the usual public notice and comment procedures if a petitioner certifies
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-400A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-400A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-400A1.txt
  • comments and replies. This, in turn, will help the Commission in its decision-making and resolving the complex and significant public policy issues raised in this proceeding. Draft of Proposed Rules. In the Second NPRM, the Commission did not elect to prepare a draft of specific proposed rules. MMTC urges that such a draft of specific rules should be prepared. Section 1.413(c) of the Commission's Rules indicates that a notice of proposed rule making shall contain ``[e]ither the terms or substance of the proposed rule or a description of the subjects and issues involved.'' MMTC does not allege that the Second NPRM failed to meet this requirement. It asserts only that a draft of specific proposed rules could prevent some of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2990A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2990A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2990A1.txt
  • rulemaking),1.401(c) (supportive materials required in a petition for rulemaking). See, e.g., Fort Stockton and Sanderson, Texas, 18 FCC Rcd 11759 (MB 2003); Clarendon, Texas, 18 FCC Rcd 12701 (MB 2003) (refraining from adopting an allotment when petitioner fails to make timely expression of interest). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.407 (notice of proposed rulemaking issued, if appropriate), 1.412(a) (notice procedures) and 1.413 (content of notices of proposed rulemaking, including docket number assigned to the proceeding). See 47 C.F.R. §1.415(a) & (b). NCE Second Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 6705. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.415(c). $ $ 5 6 4 ; B F ] ^ _ n z • tm ¬ ¯ ¹ º ÿ‰PNG É!´R>^ÒïS›Sß¿†"KækÆý˜÷¯‡er4 ÐJùdM¿O­O ° ˜,I TV¨Û5 0Žz̪ƒ§
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269807A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269807A1.pdf
  • relative current amplitude ratios for towers 1, 3, and 4 with respect to reference tower 2 all measured at least 19.3% above the authorized ratios in both day and night modes, exceeding the allowable 5% tolerance. The observed values are summarized in the following table: Mode Day Night Tower # 1 3 4 1 3 4 Sample Current Ratio 1.379 1.413 1.693 0.920 0.691 0.697 Authorized Ratio 1.153 1.167 1.331 0.771 0.560 0.550 Deviation (%) 19.6% 21.0% 27.2% 19.3% 23.3% 26.7% . All replies and documentation sent in response to this Notice should be marked with the File No. and NOV No. specified above, and mailed to the following address: Federal Communications Commission New York Office 201 Varick Street, Suite 1151
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-221A3.pdf
  • the incumbent LEC to provide Interim Line Sharing. The compatibility standard in the previous sentence shall be presumptively met if the Advanced Service utilizes a technology for which the spectral mask complies with an industry-recognized standard that would be compatible with both (i) the incumbent LEC's voice grade service, and (ii) the filters specified in Annex E to ANSI standard T1.413-1998. For any other technology, the separate Advanced Services affiliate may meet the compatibility standard by showing that the technology (i) would be compatible with the incumbent LEC's voice grade service and (ii) is compatible with the filters specified in Annex E to ANSI standard T1.413-1998. Surrogate Line Sharing Charges shall not apply retroactively to charges for an unbundled loop 52
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-103A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-103A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-103A1.txt
  • (Bureau) released a Memorandum Opinion and Order granting Alcatel USA, Inc., a waiver of Section 68.308(e)(1) of the Commission's rules for its ADSL modem. The Bureau granted the waiver subject to two conditions (Alcatel conditions), which were corrected by erratum to read as follows: the ADSL modem must (1) meet the transmitter spectral response requirements specified in Section 7.14 of T1.413- Issue Two (1998), and (2) operate with an aggregate power of less than 12.5 dBm over the range 25.875 to 138 kHz as specified in Section 7.15 of the same document. The Alcatel Waiver Order additionally established a streamlined process for Part 68 waivers of ADSL modems, eliminating the usual public notice and comment procedures if a petitioner certifies that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-110A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-110A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-110A1.txt
  • voted on in late 2005, but that has not yet occurred. Pursuant to the Commission's rules, parties may initiate a new proceeding by filing a petition for rule making or the Commission may institute such a proceeding on its own motion. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.411. In either event, a new docket number will be assigned. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.413(d). Regulatory Flexibility Act § 603, 5 U.S.C. § 603 (2005). See Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding Dedicated Short-Range Communication Services in the 5.850-5.925 GHz Band (5.9 GHz Band), Report and Order, 19 FCC Rcd 2458, 2496 ¶ 87 (2004) (DSRC Report and Order). See 5 U.S.C. § 604. See 5 U.S.C. § 604(b). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 06-110
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-56A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-56A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-56A1.txt
  • has been found unsupported or unpersuasive. For that matter, the Commission may sua sponte incorporate a forbearance petition record in a notice of proposed rulemaking. We perceive no limitation on such actions in the letter or intent of section 10. Although we model our notice rules for petitions for forbearance on our notice rules for rulemakings at 47 C.F.R. § 1.413, this in no way implies that we consider forbearance petition proceedings to be, or fundamentally to resemble, rulemakings. Most commenters favor the use of notice and comment procedures in forbearance proceedings. See, e.g., SBA Comments at 5-6 (stating that the forbearance process should be subject to notice and comment procedures because receiving input from industry is critical to well-reasoned decisions
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-16A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-16A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-16A1.txt
  • 6 Ex Parte at 3; see also Google Apr. 24 Ex Parte at 2 (asserting that ``any issues surrounding granting more expansive rights to wireless microphones in the TV White Spaces bands properly should be decided in [the white spaces proceeding]''). Dell and Microsoft May 6 Ex Parte at 3 n.8 (citing 5 U.S.C. § 553(b)(3) and 47 C.F.R. § 1.413(c)). Shure June 29 Ex Parte Comments at 8-9 (footnote omitted). Verizon Wireless June 8 Ex Parte at 5 (footnote omitted) (asserting that ``there can be no doubt that a Part 15 regime, with wireless microphone operations subject to the technical rules of Part 74 LPAS devices in the TV Bands, is a `logical outgrowth' of the NPRM'') (footnote omitted); see
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-355A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-355A1.txt
  • transmission systems that use the voiceband frequency range are not generally suitable for line sharing. See Covad Comments at 5; Rhythms Reply Comments at 16. 137 Covad Comments at 5 and Joshi Aff. at 2; Rhythms Reply Comments at 4-5. 138 NorthPoint Comments at 21. 139 Id. 140 Id. 141 Splitters are generally standardized products, manufactured to comply with ANSI T1.413-1998, Annex E.1, Figure E.1. Covad Comments at 5, n.11 and Joshi Aff. at 4. Cf. Paradyne Oct. 12 Ex Parte (arguing that no single POTS splitter design will accommodate all technologies). 142 The splitter at the customer end handles one line, and the splitter at the central office can handle multiple lines simultaneously. See Covad Comments at 5, n.11 and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fc99279c.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fc99279c.txt
  • the incumbent LEC to provide Interim Line Sharing. The compatibility standard in the previous sentence shall be presumptively met if the Advanced Service utilizes a technology for which the spectral mask complies with an industry-recognized standard that would be compatible with both (i) the incumbent LEC's voice grade service, and (ii) the filters specified in Annex E to ANSI standard T1.413-1998. For any other technology, the separate Advanced Services affiliate may meet the compatibility standard by showing that the technology (i) would be compatible with the incumbent LEC's voice grade service and (ii) is compatible with the filters specified in Annex E to ANSI standard T1.413-1998. Surrogate Line Sharing Charges shall not apply retroactively to charges for an unbundled loop incurred
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.wp
  • as establishing binder group administration and deployment practices.151 The development of spectral compatibility standards should help to minimize Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-48 152 The T1E1.4 working group of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) is developing standards for the various varieties of xDSL. See e.g., Network and Customer Installation Interfaces - Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line (ADSL) Metallic Interface (ANSI T1.413-1995) (ANSI T1.413 standard presents the electrical characteristics of the ADSL signals appearing at the network interface.) The physical interface between the network and the customer installation is also described. The transport medium for the signals is a single twisted-wire pair that supports both Message Telecommunications Service (also referred to as POTS) and full-duplex (simultaneous two-way) and simplex (from the network
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99355.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99355.txt
  • and install such equipment in response to a competitive LEC's request than it would take the incumbent to procure and install the same equipment for itself. Any failure to make this accommodation in a reasonably prompt manner would constitute a violation of the incumbent LEC's section 251 unbundling obligations. As described by NorthPoint, the passive splitter called for in the T1E1.413 ADSL standard directs the voice and data traffic to the appropriate transmission equipment and is available from an array of vendors. These splitters are generally located at or adjacent to the main distribution frame (MDF) at an incumbent's central office. That configuration permits the incumbent to easily control the local loop and the splitter functions and reduces the possibility of
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/d000335c.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/d000335c.txt
  • any SBC-12STATE ILECs equipment deployed in the COT or serving wire center (SWC). SBC-12STATE shall publish Technical Publications for the purpose of communicating current standards and their application within the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN). This offering will support the deployment of any DSL equipment which provides for the transmission of ADSL technologies which comply with current national standards (ANSI T1.413-1998). Loop qualification will be offered as described in Appendix DSL to this agreement. At this time other DSL technologies will not be offered in conjunction with this offering due to technical limitations with the DLE infrastructure being deployed by the SBC ILECs. As additional technologies are made technically feasible, the SBC ILECs will consider such technologies at that time. A
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2000/fcc00345.pdf
  • Legal Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 418-2130. VI. ORDERING CLAUSES 45. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking is issued pursuant to the authority contained in Sections 4(i), 303, 307, 309, and 336 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 303, 307, 309, and 336, and Sections 1.412, 1.413, and 1.415 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1,412, 1.413, and 1.415. 46. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Commission's Consumer Information Bureau, Reference Information Center, SHALL SEND a copy of this Notice, including the Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Magalie Roman Salas Secretary Federal Communications
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Public_Notices/Exparte/1999/esbc917a.doc
  • the incumbent LEC to provide Interim Line Sharing. The compatibility standard in the previous sentence shall be presumptively met if the Advanced Service utilizes a technology for which the spectral mask complies with an industry-recognized standard that would be compatible with both (i) the incumbent LEC's voice grade service, and (ii) the filters specified in Annex E to ANSI standard T1.413-1998. For any other technology, the separate Advanced Services affiliate may meet the compatibility standard by showing that the technology (i) would be compatible with the incumbent LEC's voice grade service and (ii) is compatible with the filters specified in Annex E to ANSI standard T1.413-1998. Surrogate Line Sharing Charges shall not apply retroactively to charges for an unbundled loop incurred
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Public_Notices/Exparte/1999/exparsbc.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Public_Notices/Exparte/1999/exparsbc.txt
  • the incumbent LEC to provide Interim Line Sharing. The compatibility standard in the previous sentence shall be presumptively met if the Advanced Service utilizes a technology for which the spectral mask complies with an industry-recognized standard that would be compatible with both (i) the incumbent LEC's voice grade service, and (ii) the filters specified in Annex E to ANSI standard T1.413-1998. For any other technology, the separate Advanced Services affiliate may meet the compatibility standard by showing that the technology (i) would be compatible with the incumbent LEC's voice grade service and (ii) is compatible with the filters specified in Annex E to ANSI standard T1.413-1998. Surrogate Line Sharing Charges shall not apply retroactively to charges for an unbundled loop incurred
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/04/releases/fmoo4264.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/04/releases/fmoo4264.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/04/releases/fmoo4264.wp
  • be used for auctionable services.78 The Notice's proposal to adopt processing rules based on Parts 22 and 90 of the Commission's Rules, with any appropriate modifications for PCS services, clearly indicated to commenters the terms of the proposed rules, as is required by the Administrative Procedures Act and the Commission's Rules (see 5 U.S.C. § 553 and 47 C.F.R. § 1.413(c)). Thus, we believe our original description of the proposed rule was sufficiently specific to alert interested parties to the substance of our proposal and to provide an adequate opportunity for comment on those proposals. Several commenters did, in fact, address the proposed application and processing rules set forth in our Notice, a further indication that sufficient notice was provided.79 We
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/04/releases/frao3253.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/04/releases/frao3253.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/04/releases/frao3253.wp
  • the general procedural, processing and petition to deny procedures that should be used for auctionable services. The Notice's proposal to adopt processing rules based on Part 22 of the Commission's Rules, with any appropriate modifications for PCS services, clearly indicated to commenters the terms of the proposed rules, as is required by 5 U.S.C. § 553 and 47 C.F.R. § 1.413(c). Accordingly, we believe that the Notice's description of the proposed rules was sufficiently specific to alert interested parties to the substance of our proposal and to provide an adequate opportunity for comment on those proposals. Moreover, we conclude that these issues are well within the scope of the Notice. 83. As we proposed, we adopt for broadband PCS a modified
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98188.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98188.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98188.wp
  • FCC 98-188 304 See, e.g., NorthPoint July 7 Ex Parte at 8-9. 305 See MCI July 30 Ex Parte at 19. 306 See, e.g., id. 307 The T1E1.4 working group of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) is developing standards for xDSL spectrum management. See e.g., Network and Customer Installation Interfaces - Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line (ADSL) Metallic Interface (ANSI T1.413-1995) (ANSI T1.413 standard presents the electrical characteristics of the ADSL signals appearing at the network interface. The physical interface between the network and the customer installation is also described. The transport medium for the signals is a single twisted-wire pair that supports both Message Telecommunications Service (POTS) and full-duplex (simultaneous two-way) and simplex (from the network to the customer installation)
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fc99279c.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fc99279c.txt
  • the incumbent LEC to provide Interim Line Sharing. The compatibility standard in the previous sentence shall be presumptively met if the Advanced Service utilizes a technology for which the spectral mask complies with an industry-recognized standard that would be compatible with both (i) the incumbent LEC's voice grade service, and (ii) the filters specified in Annex E to ANSI standard T1.413-1998. For any other technology, the separate Advanced Services affiliate may meet the compatibility standard by showing that the technology (i) would be compatible with the incumbent LEC's voice grade service and (ii) is compatible with the filters specified in Annex E to ANSI standard T1.413-1998. Surrogate Line Sharing Charges shall not apply retroactively to charges for an unbundled loop incurred
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.wp
  • as establishing binder group administration and deployment practices.151 The development of spectral compatibility standards should help to minimize Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-48 152 The T1E1.4 working group of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) is developing standards for the various varieties of xDSL. See e.g., Network and Customer Installation Interfaces - Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line (ADSL) Metallic Interface (ANSI T1.413-1995) (ANSI T1.413 standard presents the electrical characteristics of the ADSL signals appearing at the network interface.) The physical interface between the network and the customer installation is also described. The transport medium for the signals is a single twisted-wire pair that supports both Message Telecommunications Service (also referred to as POTS) and full-duplex (simultaneous two-way) and simplex (from the network
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99355.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99355.txt
  • and install such equipment in response to a competitive LEC's request than it would take the incumbent to procure and install the same equipment for itself. Any failure to make this accommodation in a reasonably prompt manner would constitute a violation of the incumbent LEC's section 251 unbundling obligations. As described by NorthPoint, the passive splitter called for in the T1E1.413 ADSL standard directs the voice and data traffic to the appropriate transmission equipment and is available from an array of vendors. These splitters are generally located at or adjacent to the main distribution frame (MDF) at an incumbent's central office. That configuration permits the incumbent to easily control the local loop and the splitter functions and reduces the possibility of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000388.doc
  • section 68.308(e) of the Commission's rules to permit Paradyne Corporation to register its Hotwire(c) MVL modem, a device that complied with the ANSI T1.601 standard. On July 30, 1999, NSD released an Order granting waiver of section 68.308(e)(1) of the Commission's rules to permit Northern Telecom Inc. (``Nortel'') to register its 1-Meg Modem, a device that complied with the ANSI T1.413 standard. In the former proceeding, we formulated and applied, and in the latter elaborated on and applied, a two-part test to determine the merits of a request for waiver of Section 68.308(e)(1) to permit registration of non-conforming Customer Premises Equipment (CPE) (Nortel Test). The first prong of the test is an evaluation of the CPE's benefit to the public interest,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000981.doc
  • a Memorandum Opinion and Order granting Alcatel USA, Inc., (Alcatel) a waiver of Section 68.308(e)(1) of the Commission's rules for a similar ADSL modem. The Commission granted the waiver subject to two conditions (Alcatel conditions), which were corrected by erratum to read as follows: the ADSL modem must (1) meet the transmitter spectral response requirements specified in Section 7.14 of T1.413- Issue Two (1998), and (2) operate with an aggregate power of less than 12.5 dBm over the range 25.875 to 138 kHz as specified in Section 7.15 of the same document. 5. The Alcatel Waiver Order additionally established a streamlined process for Part 68 waivers of ADSL modems, eliminating the usual public notice and comment procedures if a petitioner certifies
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001183.doc
  • a Memorandum Opinion and Order granting Alcatel USA, Inc., (Alcatel) a waiver of Section 68.308(e)(1) of the Commission's rules for a similar ADSL modem. The Commission granted the waiver subject to two conditions (Alcatel conditions), which were corrected by erratum to read as follows: the ADSL modem must (1) meet the transmitter spectral response requirements specified in Section 7.14 of T1.413- Issue Two (1998), and (2) operate with an aggregate power of less than 12.5 dBm over the range 25.875 to 138 kHz as specified in Section 7.15 of the same document. 5. The Alcatel Waiver Order additionally established a streamlined process for Part 68 waivers of ADSL modems, eliminating the usual public notice and comment procedures if a petitioner certifies
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001430.doc
  • a Memorandum Opinion and Order granting Alcatel USA, Inc., (Alcatel) a waiver of Section 68.308(e)(1) of the Commission's rules for a similar ADSL modem. The Commission granted the waiver subject to two conditions (Alcatel conditions), which were corrected by erratum to read as follows: the ADSL modem must (1) meet the transmitter spectral response requirements specified in Section 7.14 of T1.413- Issue Two (1998), and (2) operate with an aggregate power of less than 12.5 dBm over the range 25.875 to 138 kHz as specified in Section 7.15 of the same document. 5. The Alcatel Waiver Order additionally established a streamlined process for Part 68 waivers of ADSL modems, eliminating the usual public notice and comment procedures if a petitioner certifies
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001613.doc
  • a Memorandum Opinion and Order granting Alcatel USA, Inc., (Alcatel) a waiver of Section 68.308(e)(1) of the Commission's rules for a similar ADSL modem. The Commission granted the waiver subject to two conditions (Alcatel conditions), which were corrected by erratum to read as follows: the ADSL modem must (1) meet the transmitter spectral response requirements specified in Section 7.14 of T1.413- Issue Two (1998), and (2) operate with an aggregate power of less than 12.5 dBm over the range 25.875 to 138 kHz as specified in Section 7.15 of the same document. 5. The Alcatel Waiver Order additionally established a streamlined process for Part 68 waivers of ADSL modems, eliminating the usual public notice and comment procedures if a petitioner certifies
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001653.doc
  • of the Commission's rules does not excuse an applicant from compliance with the Commission's other requirements. On February 8, 2000, NSD released an Order granting waiver of section 68.308(e) of the Commission's rules to permit Alcatel USA, Inc., to register its Model 1000 Asynchronous Digital Subscriber Line (ADSL) modem, a device that complied with sections 7.14 and 7.15 of ANSI T1.413-1998 standard. In that proceeding, we formulated and applied a two-part test to determine the merits of a request for waiver of Section 68.308(e)(1) to permit registration of non-conforming Customer Premises Equipment (CPE) (Nortel Test). The first prong of the test is an evaluation of the CPE's benefit to the public interest, with an emphasis on the potential gain in consumer
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001696.doc
  • a Memorandum Opinion and Order granting Alcatel USA, Inc., (Alcatel) a waiver of Section 68.308(e)(1) of the Commission's rules for a similar ADSL modem. The Commission granted the waiver subject to two conditions (Alcatel conditions), which were corrected by erratum to read as follows: the ADSL modem must (1) meet the transmitter spectral response requirements specified in Section 7.14 of T1.413- Issue Two (1998), and (2) operate with an aggregate power of less than 12.5 dBm over the range 25.875 to 138 kHz as specified in Section 7.15 of the same document. 5. The Alcatel Waiver Order additionally established a streamlined process for Part 68 waivers of ADSL modems, eliminating the usual public notice and comment procedures if a petitioner certifies
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001965.doc
  • a Memorandum Opinion and Order granting Alcatel USA, Inc., (Alcatel) a waiver of Section 68.308(e)(1) of the Commission's rules for a similar ADSL modem. The Commission granted the waiver subject to two conditions (Alcatel conditions), which were corrected by erratum to read as follows: the ADSL modem must (1) meet the transmitter spectral response requirements specified in Section 7.14 of T1.413- Issue Two (1998), and (2) operate with an aggregate power of less than 12.5 dBm over the range 25.875 to 138 kHz as specified in Section 7.15 of the same document. 5. The Alcatel Waiver Order additionally established a streamlined process for Part 68 waivers of ADSL modems, eliminating the usual public notice and comment procedures if a petitioner certifies
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002173.doc
  • a Memorandum Opinion and Order granting Alcatel USA, Inc., (Alcatel) a waiver of Section 68.308(e)(1) of the Commission's rules for a similar ADSL modem. The Commission granted the waiver subject to two conditions (Alcatel conditions), which were corrected by erratum to read as follows: the ADSL modem must (1) meet the transmitter spectral response requirements specified in Section 7.14 of T1.413- Issue Two (1998), and (2) operate with an aggregate power of less than 12.5 dBm over the range 25.875 to 138 kHz as specified in Section 7.15 of the same document. 5. The Alcatel Waiver Order additionally established a streamlined process for Part 68 waivers of ADSL modems, eliminating the usual public notice and comment procedures if a petitioner certifies
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002407.doc
  • a Memorandum Opinion and Order granting Alcatel USA, Inc., (Alcatel) a waiver of Section 68.308(e)(1) of the Commission's rules for a similar ADSL modem. The Commission granted the waiver subject to two conditions (Alcatel conditions), which were corrected by erratum to read as follows: the ADSL modem must (1) meet the transmitter spectral response requirements specified in Section 7.14 of T1.413- Issue Two (1998), and (2) operate with an aggregate power of less than 12.5 dBm over the range 25.875 to 138 kHz as specified in Section 7.15 of the same document. 5. The Alcatel Waiver Order additionally established a streamlined process for Part 68 waivers of ADSL modems, eliminating the usual public notice and comment procedures if a petitioner certifies
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/er000388.doc
  • of an industry standard. The second condition did not cite a standard. Only section 7.14 should have been cited in the first condition. Section 7.15 should instead be cited in the second condition. The conditions in paragraph 26 of that order are hereby amended to read as follows: "(1) meets the transmitter spectral response requirements specified in Section 7.14 of T1.413- Issue Two (1998), and (2) operates with an aggregate power of less than 12.5 dBm over the range 25.875 to 138 kHz as specified in Section 7.15 of the same document." FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION L. Charles Keller Chief, Network Services Division Common Carrier Bureau Federal Communications Commission DA 00-388 ________________________________________________________________________ _____________ Federal Communications Commission DA 00-388 ________________________________________________________________________ _____________ „Ð „Ð
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da992281.doc
  • carrier network offerings. We seek comment on Alcatel's claimed benefits with respect to innovation, consumer choice, consumer value, etc., and generally on the benefits to consumers were we to grant this waiver. Alcatel claims that the Model 1000 ADSL modem will not cause harm to the network because the Model 1000 ADSL modem satisfies Sections 7.14 and 7.15 of ANSI T1.413-1998, a widely accepted industry standard. More specifically, Alcatel claims that this modem's performance meets the transmitter spectral response power spectral density mask for the transmitted signal, as required in Section 7.14 of T1.413-1998; and operates within an aggregate transmit power over the 25.875 to 138 kHz band of less than 12.5 dBm. In support of the claims that this modem
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/d000335c.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/d000335c.txt
  • any SBC-12STATE ILECs equipment deployed in the COT or serving wire center (SWC). SBC-12STATE shall publish Technical Publications for the purpose of communicating current standards and their application within the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN). This offering will support the deployment of any DSL equipment which provides for the transmission of ADSL technologies which comply with current national standards (ANSI T1.413-1998). Loop qualification will be offered as described in Appendix DSL to this agreement. At this time other DSL technologies will not be offered in conjunction with this offering due to technical limitations with the DLE infrastructure being deployed by the SBC ILECs. As additional technologies are made technically feasible, the SBC ILECs will consider such technologies at that time. A
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/4361-97.pdf
  • 0.0 9,098,63159.128.1 1.6 7.2 4.1 Angola $3,096,65359.321.2 8.4 3.2 7.9 $577,543100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $255,219100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3,122,53263.212.0 6.4 4.414.0 Benin $3,849,32240.719.429.4 6.7 3.7 $174,79253.446.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 $454100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4,658,93234.524.125.511.3 4.6 Botswana $1,804,39363.226.2 9.1 0.1 1.5 $420,58399.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 $39,586100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,689,90776.915.0 5.7 0.1 2.2 Burkina $2,165,33642.634.8 8.1 1.413.2 $131,00153.446.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 $328,33698.3 1.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,267,98631.847.1 7.7 3.7 9.7 Burundi $1,147,59155.322.9 1.4 7.013.4 $0 $0 374,987 0.133.9 1.512.751.8 Cameroon $6,680,95360.831.7 1.6 1.3 4.6 $1,317,58351.648.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 $2,245,72172.127.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 6,812,25953.538.3 1.3 1.9 5.0 Canary Island $1,039 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $0 $0 3,629 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 Cape Verde $5,487,81748.631.314.0 2.4 3.7 $342,96660.639.4 0.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2000/fcc00345.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2000/fcc00345.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2000/fcc00345.txt
  • Cyndi Thomas, Legal Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 418-2130. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking is issued pursuant to the authority contained in Sections 4(i), 303, 307, 309, and 336 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 303, 307, 309, and 336, and Sections 1.412, 1.413, and 1.415 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1,412, 1.413, and 1.415. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Commission's Consumer Information Bureau, Reference Information Center, SHALL SEND a copy of this Notice, including the Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Magalie Roman Salas Secretary APPENDIX A COMMENTS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Public_Notices/Exparte/1999/esbc917a.doc
  • the incumbent LEC to provide Interim Line Sharing. The compatibility standard in the previous sentence shall be presumptively met if the Advanced Service utilizes a technology for which the spectral mask complies with an industry-recognized standard that would be compatible with both (i) the incumbent LEC's voice grade service, and (ii) the filters specified in Annex E to ANSI standard T1.413-1998. For any other technology, the separate Advanced Services affiliate may meet the compatibility standard by showing that the technology (i) would be compatible with the incumbent LEC's voice grade service and (ii) is compatible with the filters specified in Annex E to ANSI standard T1.413-1998. Surrogate Line Sharing Charges shall not apply retroactively to charges for an unbundled loop incurred
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Public_Notices/Exparte/1999/exparsbc.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Public_Notices/Exparte/1999/exparsbc.txt
  • the incumbent LEC to provide Interim Line Sharing. The compatibility standard in the previous sentence shall be presumptively met if the Advanced Service utilizes a technology for which the spectral mask complies with an industry-recognized standard that would be compatible with both (i) the incumbent LEC's voice grade service, and (ii) the filters specified in Annex E to ANSI standard T1.413-1998. For any other technology, the separate Advanced Services affiliate may meet the compatibility standard by showing that the technology (i) would be compatible with the incumbent LEC's voice grade service and (ii) is compatible with the filters specified in Annex E to ANSI standard T1.413-1998. Surrogate Line Sharing Charges shall not apply retroactively to charges for an unbundled loop incurred
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/1999/dd990802.html
  • SETTLEMENT AND WITHDRAWAL OF PETITION TO DENY THE GRANT OF MAJOR MODIFCATION APPLICATION. (DA No. 99-1396). Internet URL: [22]http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/da991396.wp ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- NORTHERN TELECOM, INC. Granted Northern Telecom, Inc.'s Petition for Waiver of Section 68.308(e) of the Rules, 47 C.F. R. Section 68.308(e) given with the condition that the NORTEL 1 MEG MODEM continue to comply with the T1.413 standard. Action by Chief, Network Services Division, Common Carrier Bureau. Adopted: July 12, 1999. by MO&O. (DA No. 99-1350). CCB Internet URL: [23]http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da991350.wp CITIZENS TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANY/ALLIANCE GROUP SERVICES, INC. Granted Citizens Telecommunications Company and Alliance Group Services, Inc. a limited waiver of the authorization and verification requirements of the Commission's rules and Carrier Change Orders to enable Alliance to change
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-269807A1.html
  • relative current amplitude ratios for towers 1, 3, and 4 with respect to reference tower 2 all measured at least 19.3% above the authorized ratios in both day and night modes, exceeding the allowable 5% tolerance. The observed values are summarized in the following table: Mode Day Night Tower # 1 3 4 1 3 4 Sample Current Ratio 1.379 1.413 1.693 0.920 0.691 0.697 Authorized Ratio 1.153 1.167 1.331 0.771 0.560 0.550 Deviation (%) 19.6% 21.0% 27.2% 19.3% 23.3% 26.7% 3. Pursuant to Section 308(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1.89 of the Commission's Rules, Millennium Shore License Holdco, LLC must submit a written statement concerning this matter within twenty (20) days of release of