FCC Web Documents citing 1.430

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-62A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-62A1.pdf
  • and enterprises. This Notice of Inquiry is a critical first step toward understanding survivability of our broadband communications networks to all types of failures and severe traffic overloads. We look forward to collaborating with consumers, businesses, and network operators to improve and secure our broadband infrastructure for the future. Procedural Matters Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415, 1.419 and 1.430 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR §§ 1.415, 1.419, 1.430, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-63A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-63A1.pdf
  • and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one-or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415, 1.419 and 1.430 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR §§ 1.415, 1.419, 1.430, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-55A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-55A1.pdf
  • confidentiality should follow the procedures set forth in section 0.459 of the Commission's rules. Confidential submissions may not be filed via ECFS but rather should be filed with the Secretary's Office following the procedures set forth in 47 C.F.R. § 0.459. Redacted versions of confidential submissions may be filed via ECFS. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415, 1.419, and 1.430 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing paper copies. . Paper Filers: Parties who choose to file by paper
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch//FCC-02-263A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch//FCC-02-263A1.pdf
  • activities of any provider of telecommunications service,'' and (2) to ``determine whether any such regulation is no longer necessary in the public interest as the result of meaningful economic competition between the providers of such service.'' The Commission is directed to repeal or modify any such regulations that it finds are no longer in the public interest. Pursuant to section 1.430 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.430, we seek suggestions from the public as to what rules should be modified or repealed as part of the 2002 biennial review. The Commission also encourages parties to comment on or recommend changes to rules that might enable the Commission to operate more efficiently and effectively. Submissions by the public should identify
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch//FCC-02-264A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch//FCC-02-264A1.pdf
  • activities of any provider of telecommunications service,'' and (2) to ``determine whether any such regulation is no longer necessary in the public interest as the result of meaningful economic competition between the providers of such service.'' The Commission is directed to repeal or modify any such regulations that it finds are no longer in the public interest. Pursuant to Section 1.430 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.430, we seek suggestions from the public as to what rules should be modified or repealed as part of the 2002 biennial review. The Commission also encourages parties to comment on or recommend changes to rules that might enable the Commission to operate more efficiently and effectively. Submissions by the public should identify
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch//FCC-02-265A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch//FCC-02-265A1.pdf
  • activities of any provider of telecommunications service,'' and (2) to ``determine whether any such regulation is no longer necessary in the public interest as the result of meaningful economic competition between the providers of such service.'' The Commission is directed to repeal or modify any such regulations that it finds are no longer in the public interest. Pursuant to Section 1.430 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.430, the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau (CGB) seeks suggestions from the public as to what rules should be modified or repealed as part of the 2002 biennial review. The Commission also encourages parties to comment on or recommend changes to rules that might enable the Commission to operate more efficiently and effectively.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2382A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2382A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2382A1.txt
  • activities of any provider of telecommunications service,'' and (2) to ``determine whether any such regulation is no longer necessary in the public interest as the result of meaningful economic competition between the providers of such service.'' The Commission is directed to repeal or modify any such regulations that it finds are no longer in the public interest. Pursuant to section 1.430 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.430, we seek suggestions from the public as to what rules should be modified or repealed as part of the 2002 biennial review. The rule parts containing regulations administered by the International Bureau are set out in an attachment to this Notice. The Commission also encourages parties to comment on or recommend changes
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-661A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-661A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-661A1.txt
  • of factors will influence a broadband consumer's experience. Some of those factors are in the consumer's control, some are in the service provider's control, and some are outside of the control of both. How can these determinants of network performance best be conveyed to consumers so that they can optimize their broadband service quality? Pursuant to sections 1.415, 1.419 and 1.430 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419 and 1.430, interested parties may file comments on or before May 26, 2011, and reply comments on or before June 16, 2011. All filings must reference CG Docket No. 09-158. Comments may be filed using: the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS): http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs, or by filing paper copies. Electronic filers should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-247351A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-247351A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-247351A2.txt
  • activities of any provider of telecommunications service,'' and (2) to ``determine whether any such regulation is no longer necessary in the public interest as the result of meaningful economic competition between the providers of such service.'' The Commission is directed to repeal or modify any such regulations that it finds are no longer in the public interest. Pursuant to Section 1.430 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.430, we seek suggestions from the public as to what rules should be modified or repealed as part of the 2004 biennial review. Submissions by the public should identify with as much specificity as possible the rule or rules that should be modified or repealed, and why the regulations should be modified or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284321A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284321A2.txt
  • in the United States (by Country of Origin) in the United States Billed Percent Share by Carrier Receipts Percent Share by Carrier Receipts Percent Share by Carrier Total Percent Share by Carrier Revenues 1 2 3 4 Other from PTT 1 2 3 4 Other from PTT 1 2 3 4 Other Minutes 1 2 3 4 Other Andorra $177,714 1.430.4 0.031.4 36.7 $1,408 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $45 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 2,454,842 0.210.2 0.049.9 39.6 Austria $11,694,079 1.122.3 0.723.9 52.0 $1,634,603 0.038.8 0.048.1 13.1 $2,713 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 141,462,544 0.617.9 0.644.2 36.7 Belgium $23,084,490 0.034.0 1.912.3 51.8 $2,233,776 0.012.6 0.037.9 49.5 $2,882,868 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 270,815,840 0.018.1 3.733.5 44.7 Cyprus $1,565,113 0.121.4 0.122.1 56.2 $98,760 0.039.3 0.029.0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-355A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-355A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-355A1.txt
  • if it decides to regulate in this area? If so, what are these other goals? Should the Commission emphasize some of these goals more than competitive neutrality or other goals? Commenters should provide a detailed explanation of how the Commission's section 10 analysis should be applied to various providers of high-speed services. Procedural Matters Pursuant to sections 1.415, 1.419, and 1.430 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, 1.430, interested parties may file comments within 45 days after publication in the Federal Register, and reply comments within 75 days after publication in the Federal Register. All filings should refer to GEN Docket No. 00-185. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-132A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-132A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-132A1.txt
  • intercarrier compensation regime. When seeking comment on the alternative of contractual arrangements for intercarrier compensation, we ask commenters to address the potential impacts of such a market-based approach on small entities, such as the refusal to carry traffic. Federal Rules that May Duplicate, Overlap or Conflict With the Proposed Rules None. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415, 1.419, and 1.430 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, 1.430, interested parties may file comments within 90 days after publication in the Federal Register, and reply comments within 135 days after publication in the Federal Register. All filings should refer to CC Docket No. 01-92. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-146A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-146A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-146A1.txt
  • the resources available to small entities. We ask commenters to indicate whether and how such provisions would be consistent with our goals in this proceeding, including our obligation to ensure just and reasonable rates for interstate access services. Federal Rules that May Duplicate, Overlap, or Conflict With the Proposed Rules None. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415, 1.419, and 1.430 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, 1.430, interested parties may file comments within 30 days after publication in the Federal Register, and reply comments within 60 days after publication in the Federal Register. All filings should refer to CC Docket No. 96-262. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-223A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-223A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-223A1.txt
  • low-income, and tribal communities reflected in our data. Can these trends be replicated in other areas? Are there groups of Americans for whom the pace of deployment justifies particular actions under section 706? If so, what would those specific actions entail, and what would the costs and benefits of those actions be? Procedural Matters Pursuant to sections 1.415, 1.419, and 1.430 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.415, 1.419, 1.430, interested parties may file comments 30 days from publication in the Federal Register, and reply comments 45 days from publication in the Federal Register. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-263A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-263A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-263A1.txt
  • activities of any provider of telecommunications service,'' and (2) to ``determine whether any such regulation is no longer necessary in the public interest as the result of meaningful economic competition between the providers of such service.'' The Commission is directed to repeal or modify any such regulations that it finds are no longer in the public interest. Pursuant to section 1.430 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.430, we seek suggestions from the public as to what rules should be modified or repealed as part of the 2002 biennial review. The Commission also encourages parties to comment on or recommend changes to rules that might enable the Commission to operate more efficiently and effectively. Submissions by the public should identify
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-264A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-264A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-264A1.txt
  • activities of any provider of telecommunications service,'' and (2) to ``determine whether any such regulation is no longer necessary in the public interest as the result of meaningful economic competition between the providers of such service.'' The Commission is directed to repeal or modify any such regulations that it finds are no longer in the public interest. Pursuant to Section 1.430 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.430, we seek suggestions from the public as to what rules should be modified or repealed as part of the 2002 biennial review. The Commission also encourages parties to comment on or recommend changes to rules that might enable the Commission to operate more efficiently and effectively. Submissions by the public should identify
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-265A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-265A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-265A1.txt
  • activities of any provider of telecommunications service,'' and (2) to ``determine whether any such regulation is no longer necessary in the public interest as the result of meaningful economic competition between the providers of such service.'' The Commission is directed to repeal or modify any such regulations that it finds are no longer in the public interest. Pursuant to Section 1.430 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.430, the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau (CGB) seeks suggestions from the public as to what rules should be modified or repealed as part of the 2002 biennial review. The Commission also encourages parties to comment on or recommend changes to rules that might enable the Commission to operate more efficiently and effectively.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-266A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-266A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-266A1.txt
  • activities of any provider of telecommunications service,'' and (2) to ``determine whether any such regulation is no longer necessary in the public interest as the result of meaningful economic competition between the providers of such service.'' The Commission is directed to repeal or modify any such regulations that it finds are no longer in the public interest. Pursuant to Section 1.430 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.430, we seek suggestions from the public as to what rules should be modified or repealed as part of the 2002 biennial review. The Commission also encourages parties to comment on or recommend changes to rules that might enable the Commission to operate more efficiently and effectively. Submissions by the public should identify
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-267A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-267A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-267A1.txt
  • activities of any provider of telecommunications service,'' and (2) to ``determine whether any such regulation is no longer necessary in the public interest as the result of meaningful economic competition between the providers of such service.'' The Commission is directed to repeal or modify any such regulations that it finds are no longer in the public interest. Pursuant to Section 1.430 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.430, we seek suggestions from the public as to what rules should be modified or repealed as part of the 2002 biennial review. The Commission also encourages parties to comment on or recommend changes to rules that might enable the Commission to operate more efficiently and effectively. Submissions by the public should identify
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-57A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-57A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-57A1.txt
  • equal access and nondiscrimination obligations of competitive LECs be? We note that there is no prohibition on these carriers providing interLATA services, and providing such services on an integrated basis. Can we harmonize the obligations of competitive LECs with the obligations of other LECs that provide interLATA services on an integrated basis? PROCEDURAL MATTERS Pursuant to sections 1.415, 1.419, and 1.430 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, 1.430, interested parties may file comments within 60 days after publication in the Federal Register, and reply comments within 90 days after publication in the Federal Register. All filings should refer to CC Docket No. 02-39. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-105A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-105A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-105A1.txt
  • activities of any provider of telecommunications service,'' and (2) to ``determine whether any such regulation is no longer necessary in the public interest as the result of meaningful economic competition between the providers of such service.'' The Commission is directed to repeal or modify any such regulations that it finds are no longer in the public interest. Pursuant to Section 1.430 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.430, we seek suggestions from the public as to what rules should be modified or repealed as part of the 2004 biennial review. Submissions by the public should identify with as much specificity as possible the rule or rules that should be modified or repealed, and why the regulations should be modified or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-189A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-189A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-189A1.txt
  • NPRM should be changed, and if so, why. Finally, although we have identified above particular subjects that we believe of interest to the public regarding EAS and public alert and warning in general, we welcome comment on any other ideas relevant to the issues addressed in this NPRM. procedural matters Comments and Reply Comments. Pursuant to sections 1.415, 1.419, and 1.430 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, 1.430, interested parties may file comments on or before 60 days after publication of this NPRM in the Federal Register, and reply comments on or before 90 days after publication of this NPRM in the Federal Register. All filings should refer to EB Docket No. 04-296. Comments may be filed using
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-196A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-196A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-196A1.txt
  • providers to implement the solutions proposed in this Notice. We also seek comment on whether there continues to be any reason to have separate deadlines for VRS and IP Relay. Finally, we ask parties to provide any further information that may illuminate the issues raised in this Notice. procedural matters Comments and Reply Comments. Pursuant to sections 1.415, 1.419, and 1.430 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, 1.430, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All filings should refer to CG Docket No. 03-123. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. For additional information
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-106A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-106A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-106A1.txt
  • number of minutes of use continuing to increase, particularly with respect to VRS and IP Relay, the Fund is compensating providers only for legitimate minutes of use provided in compliance with the mandatory minimum standards, and that the compensation rates are based on accurate demand and cost data. procedural matters Comments and Reply Comments. Pursuant to Sections 1.415, 1.419, and 1.430 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, 1.430, interested parties may file comments on or before 45 days after publication of this Notice in the Federal Register, and reply comments on or before 60 days after publication of this Notice in the Federal Register. All filings should refer to CG Docket No. 03-123. Comments may be filed using
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-115A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-115A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-115A1.txt
  • activities of any provider of telecommunications service,'' and (2) to ``determine whether any such regulation is no longer necessary in the public interest as the result of meaningful economic competition between the providers of such service.'' The Commission is directed to repeal or modify any such regulations that it finds are no longer in the public interest. Pursuant to Section 1.430 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.430, we seek suggestions from the public as to what rules should be modified or repealed as part of the 2006 biennial review. Submissions should identify with as much specificity as possible the rule or rules that should be modified or repealed, and explain why and how the rule or rules should be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-57A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-57A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-57A1.txt
  • comment on whether we can ensure interoperability in some way other than mandating protocols, and on any other issues relating to ensuring that VRS consumers can use VRS equipment to call any of the VRS providers, and the VRS providers can make calls to all VRS consumers. VI. procedural matters Comments and Reply Comments. Pursuant to sections 1.415, 1.419, and 1.430 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, 1.430, interested parties may file comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All filings should refer to CG Docket No. 03-123. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-58A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-58A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-58A1.txt
  • of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 605, or any other federal or state statute, would restrict the Commission's authority to take any of the remedial actions discussed above. We also request parties to provide any additional information that may be relevant to our resolution of this issue. procedural matters Comments and Reply Comments. Pursuant to sections 1.415, 1.419, and 1.430 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, 1.430, interested parties may file comments on or before 30 days after publication of this Notice in the Federal Register, and reply comments on or before 45 days after publication of this Notice in the Federal Register. All filings should refer to CG Docket No. 03-123. Comments may be filed using
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-201A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-201A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-201A1.txt
  • or activities of any provider of telecommunications service,'' and (2) to ``determine whether any such regulation is no longer necessary in the public interest as the result of meaningful economic competition between providers of such service.'' The Commission is directed to repeal or modify any such regulations that it finds are no longer in the public interest. Pursuant to Section 1.430 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.430, we seek suggestions from the public as to what rules should be modified or repealed as part of the 2008 biennial review. Submissions should identify with as much specificity as possible the rule or rules that should be modified or repealed, and explain why and how the rule or rules should be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-212A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-212A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-212A1.txt
  • IS TERMINATED. This action is taken pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j) and 303 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), and 303. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Nondiscrimination in the Distribution of Interactive Television Services Over Cable, 16 FCC Rcd 1321 (2001). Proceedings on a notice of inquiry are governed by Section 1.430 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.430. Id., 16 FCC Rcd at 1322-23. Id. See Applications for Consent to the Transfer of Control of Licenses and Section 214 Authorization by Time Warner, Inc. and America Online, Inc. to AOL Time Warner, Inc., 16 FCC Rcd 6547 (2001) (``AOL Time Warner Order''). AOL Time Warner Order, 16 FCC Rcd at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-28A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-28A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-28A1.txt
  • presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.430, 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. Electronic Filers: Comments may be filed electronically using the Internet by accessing the ECFS: http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-148A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-148A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-148A1.txt
  • summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415, 1.419, and 1.430 of the Commission's rules, interested persons may file comments and replies regarding the Inquiry on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All filings related to this Inquiry should refer to GN Docket No. 10-159. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-204A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-204A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-204A1.txt
  • operations or activities of any provider of telecommunications service,'' and (2) to ``determine whether any such regulation is no longer necessary in the public interest as the result of meaningful economic competition between providers of such service.'' The Commission is directed to repeal or modify any regulations that it finds are no longer in the public interest. Pursuant to Section 1.430 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.430, we seek input from the public as to what rules should be modified or repealed as part of the 2010 biennial review. Submissions should identify with as much specificity as possible the rule or rules that should be modified or repealed, and explain why and how the rule or rules should be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-62A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-62A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-62A1.txt
  • and enterprises. This Notice of Inquiry is a critical first step toward understanding survivability of our broadband communications networks to all types of failures and severe traffic overloads. We look forward to collaborating with consumers, businesses, and network operators to improve and secure our broadband infrastructure for the future. Procedural Matters Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415, 1.419 and 1.430 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR §§ 1.415, 1.419, 1.430, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-63A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-63A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-63A1.txt
  • and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one-or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415, 1.419 and 1.430 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR §§ 1.415, 1.419, 1.430, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-124A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-124A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-124A1.txt
  • and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should familiarize themselves with the Commission's ex parte rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415, 1.419, and 1.430 of the Commission's rules, interested persons may file comments and replies regarding the Inquiry on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All filings related to this Inquiry should refer to GN Docket No. 11-121. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-51A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-51A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-51A1.txt
  • substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. It is generally required to have more than a one or two sentence description of the presented views and arguments. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415, 1.419, and 1.430 of the Commission's rules, interested persons may file comments and replies regarding the Notice on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All filings related to this Notice should refer to WC Docket No. 11-59. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-55A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-55A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-55A1.txt
  • confidentiality should follow the procedures set forth in section 0.459 of the Commission's rules. Confidential submissions may not be filed via ECFS but rather should be filed with the Secretary's Office following the procedures set forth in 47 C.F.R. § 0.459. Redacted versions of confidential submissions may be filed via ECFS. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415, 1.419, and 1.430 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing paper copies. . Paper Filers: Parties who choose to file by paper
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-53A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-53A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-53A1.txt
  • 20554. Accessible Formats for People with Disabilities or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (tty). ORdering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 4(o), 7(b), 301, 316, and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i)-(j) & (o), 157(b), 301, 316 and 403, section 1.430 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.430, this Notice of Inquiry IS ADOPTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary STATEMENT OF CHAIRMAN JULIUS GENACHOWSKI Re: Utilizing Rapidly Deployable Aerial Communications Architecture in Response to an Emergency, PS Docket No. 11-15. This item is one of several we have considered at the Commission, including another later today, that seem
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99168.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99168.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99168.wp
  • the communications industry? Is there any reason for the Commission to object to flat rate pricing for all long distance services? Should the Commission intervene if a customer chooses such a plan, and the Commission later determines that a usage rate plan would result in a nominally lower bill for the consumer? IV. Procedures 27.Pursuant to Sections 1.415, 1.419, and 1.430 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, 1.430, interested parties may file comments no later than September 20, 1999, and reply comments no later than October 20, 1999. Interested parties may file using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24,121 (1998).
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2000/fcc00057.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2000/fcc00057.txt
  • and manner of growth of deployment. We ask for comment whether any of the models described above is likely to lead to more rapid deployment of advanced telecommunications capability to all Americans in a reasonable and timely manner. Would some other regulatory model, or a de-regulatory or non-regulatory one, speed deployment? VII. PROCEDURAL MATTERS Pursuant to sections 1.415, 1.419, and 1.430 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.415, 1.419, 1.430, interested parties may file comments on or before March 20, 2000, and reply comments on or before April 4, 2000. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24,121 (1998).
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2001/fcc01132.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2001/fcc01132.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2001/fcc01132.txt
  • intercarrier compensation regime. When seeking comment on the alternative of contractual arrangements for intercarrier compensation, we ask commenters to address the potential impacts of such a market-based approach on small entities, such as the refusal to carry traffic. Federal Rules that May Duplicate, Overlap or Conflict With the Proposed Rules None. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415, 1.419, and 1.430 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, 1.430, interested parties may file comments within 90 days after publication in the Federal Register, and reply comments within 135 days after publication in the Federal Register. All filings should refer to CC Docket No. 01-92. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01146.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01146.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01146.txt
  • the resources available to small entities. We ask commenters to indicate whether and how such provisions would be consistent with our goals in this proceeding, including our obligation to ensure just and reasonable rates for interstate access services. Federal Rules that May Duplicate, Overlap, or Conflict With the Proposed Rules None. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415, 1.419, and 1.430 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, 1.430, interested parties may file comments within 30 days after publication in the Federal Register, and reply comments within 60 days after publication in the Federal Register. All filings should refer to CC Docket No. 96-262. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2000/fcc00184.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2000/fcc00184.txt
  • alternative DTV standard for purposes of determining eligibility pursuant to SHVA. PROCEDURAL MATTERS Ex Parte Status of Proceeding. Subject to the provisions of 47 C.F.R. § 1.1203 concerning ``Sunshine Period'' prohibitions, this proceeding is exempt from ex parte restraints and disclosure requirements, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1204(b)(1). Filing of Comments and Reply Comments. Pursuant to Sections 1.415, 1.419, and 1.430 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, 1.430, interested parties may file comments on or before June 27, 2000, and reply comments on or before July 12, 2000. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24,121 (1998).
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Notices/2000/fcc00355.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Notices/2000/fcc00355.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Notices/2000/fcc00355.txt
  • if it decides to regulate in this area? If so, what are these other goals? Should the Commission emphasize some of these goals more than competitive neutrality or other goals? Commenters should provide a detailed explanation of how the Commission's section 10 analysis should be applied to various providers of high-speed services. Procedural Matters Pursuant to sections 1.415, 1.419, and 1.430 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, 1.430, interested parties may file comments within 45 days after publication in the Federal Register, and reply comments within 75 days after publication in the Federal Register. All filings should refer to GN Docket No. 00-185. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Public_Notices/2000/fcc00346.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Public_Notices/2000/fcc00346.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Public_Notices/2000/fcc00346.txt
  • documents, the Commission will issue a report, determining which if any regulations are no longer necessary in the public interest, as required by the statute. The Commission expects that it will concurrently or subsequently initiate notice and comment rulemaking proceedings, pursuant to the Administrative Procedures Act, to modify or eliminate selected rules identified in the Commission report. Pursuant to Section 1.430 of the Commission's rules, we seek comment on the staff report and rule analysis being released today. In particular, we request comment on (1) the analysis of the statutory requirements for this biennial review; (2) whether staff's analysis is an appropriate way to determine whether a rule is necessary in the public interest; (3) the process used for conducting the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/FCC-04-189A1.html
  • be changed, and if so, why. Finally, although we have identified above particular subjects that we believe of interest to the public regarding EAS and public alert and warning in general, we welcome comment on any other ideas relevant to the issues addressed in this NPRM. V. PROCEDURAL MATTERS 49. Comments and Reply Comments. Pursuant to sections 1.415, 1.419, and 1.430 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.415, 1.419, 1.430, interested parties may file comments on or before 60 days after publication of this NPRM in the Federal Register, and reply comments on or before 90 days after publication of this NPRM in the Federal Register. All filings should refer to EB Docket No. 04-296. Comments may be filed using the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Notices/2000/fcc00341.doc
  • the accuracy of the Commission's burden estimates; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Filing of Comments and Reply Comments. Pursuant to Sections 1.415, 1.419, and 1.430 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, 1.430, interested parties may file comments on or before November 15, 2000, and reply comments on or before December 18, 2000. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24,121 (1998).
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da000327.doc
  • and manner of growth of deployment. We ask for comment whether any of the models described above is likely to lead to more rapid deployment of advanced telecommunications capability to all Americans in a reasonable and timely manner. Would some other regulatory model, or a de-regulatory or non-regulatory one, speed deployment? VII. PROCEDURAL MATTERS Pursuant to sections 1.415, 1.419, and 1.430 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.415, 1.419, 1.430, interested parties may file comments on or before March 20, 2000, and reply comments on or before April 4, 2000. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24,121 (1998).
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98187.pdf
  • that the promise of advanced telecommunications capability extend to all Americans -- including those in schools, rural areas, inner cities, and on reservations. We intend to accomplish these aims consistently with the deregulatory, market emphasis of the Act. We call for the aid of all in this great national effort. IV. PROCEDURAL MATTERS 86. Pursuant to Sections 1.415, 1.419, and 1.430 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, 1.430, interested parties may file comments on or before September 8, 1998, and reply comments on or before October 8, 1998. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24,121 (1998).
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99168.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99168.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99168.wp
  • the communications industry? Is there any reason for the Commission to object to flat rate pricing for all long distance services? Should the Commission intervene if a customer chooses such a plan, and the Commission later determines that a usage rate plan would result in a nominally lower bill for the consumer? IV. Procedures 27.Pursuant to Sections 1.415, 1.419, and 1.430 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, 1.430, interested parties may file comments no later than September 20, 1999, and reply comments no later than October 20, 1999. Interested parties may file using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24,121 (1998).
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2000/fcc00057.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2000/fcc00057.txt
  • and manner of growth of deployment. We ask for comment whether any of the models described above is likely to lead to more rapid deployment of advanced telecommunications capability to all Americans in a reasonable and timely manner. Would some other regulatory model, or a de-regulatory or non-regulatory one, speed deployment? VII. PROCEDURAL MATTERS Pursuant to sections 1.415, 1.419, and 1.430 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.415, 1.419, 1.430, interested parties may file comments on or before March 20, 2000, and reply comments on or before April 4, 2000. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24,121 (1998).
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2001/fcc01132.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2001/fcc01132.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2001/fcc01132.txt
  • intercarrier compensation regime. When seeking comment on the alternative of contractual arrangements for intercarrier compensation, we ask commenters to address the potential impacts of such a market-based approach on small entities, such as the refusal to carry traffic. Federal Rules that May Duplicate, Overlap or Conflict With the Proposed Rules None. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415, 1.419, and 1.430 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, 1.430, interested parties may file comments within 90 days after publication in the Federal Register, and reply comments within 135 days after publication in the Federal Register. All filings should refer to CC Docket No. 01-92. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2001/fcc01223.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2001/fcc01223.txt
  • low-income, and tribal communities reflected in our data. Can these trends be replicated in other areas? Are there groups of Americans for whom the pace of deployment justifies particular actions under section 706? If so, what would those specific actions entail, and what would the costs and benefits of those actions be? Procedural Matters Pursuant to sections 1.415, 1.419, and 1.430 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.415, 1.419, 1.430, interested parties may file comments 30 days from publication in the Federal Register, and reply comments 45 days from publication in the Federal Register. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01146.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01146.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01146.txt
  • the resources available to small entities. We ask commenters to indicate whether and how such provisions would be consistent with our goals in this proceeding, including our obligation to ensure just and reasonable rates for interstate access services. Federal Rules that May Duplicate, Overlap, or Conflict With the Proposed Rules None. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415, 1.419, and 1.430 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, 1.430, interested parties may file comments within 30 days after publication in the Federal Register, and reply comments within 60 days after publication in the Federal Register. All filings should refer to CC Docket No. 96-262. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/00socc.pdf
  • 198.6 2.045 FL Georgia 591.7 733.5 (141.8) (218.5) 109.8 63.8 15.5 28.2 107.4 2.378GA Hawaii 79.9 66.4 13.4 10.3 70.9 40.5 10.4 18.6 69.5 1.319 HI Idaho 456.1 445.6 10.5 0.7 19.6 10.8 3.9 4.8 19.5 0.103 ID Illinois (495.0) 135.4 (630.4) (661.8) 226.8 122.5 66.2 35.3 223.9 2.883 IL Indiana (137.8) 204.6 (342.4) (356.1) 94.7 58.3 16.2 18.8 93.3 1.430 IN Iowa 259.9 244.0 15.8 1.9 16.7 7.6 3.3 5.7 16.6 0.091 IA Kansas 98.9 23.0 75.9 63.1 (1.3) (0.7) (0.2) (0.4) (1.3) (0.013)KS Kentucky 118.6 194.8 (76.2) (86.6) 47.8 31.9 7.2 10.0 49.1 (1.283)KY Louisiana 387.3 179.5 207.9 197.8 23.8 16.0 3.0 4.6 23.6 0.219LA Maine 36.4 25.9 10.5 0.3 12.2 5.8 2.4 3.9 12.1 0.079ME Maryland 25.8 177.5
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2000/fcc00184.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2000/fcc00184.txt
  • alternative DTV standard for purposes of determining eligibility pursuant to SHVA. PROCEDURAL MATTERS Ex Parte Status of Proceeding. Subject to the provisions of 47 C.F.R. § 1.1203 concerning ``Sunshine Period'' prohibitions, this proceeding is exempt from ex parte restraints and disclosure requirements, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1204(b)(1). Filing of Comments and Reply Comments. Pursuant to Sections 1.415, 1.419, and 1.430 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, 1.430, interested parties may file comments on or before June 27, 2000, and reply comments on or before July 12, 2000. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24,121 (1998).
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Notices/2000/fcc00355.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Notices/2000/fcc00355.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Notices/2000/fcc00355.txt
  • if it decides to regulate in this area? If so, what are these other goals? Should the Commission emphasize some of these goals more than competitive neutrality or other goals? Commenters should provide a detailed explanation of how the Commission's section 10 analysis should be applied to various providers of high-speed services. Procedural Matters Pursuant to sections 1.415, 1.419, and 1.430 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, 1.430, interested parties may file comments within 45 days after publication in the Federal Register, and reply comments within 75 days after publication in the Federal Register. All filings should refer to GN Docket No. 00-185. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Public_Notices/2000/fcc00346.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Public_Notices/2000/fcc00346.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Public_Notices/2000/fcc00346.txt
  • documents, the Commission will issue a report, determining which if any regulations are no longer necessary in the public interest, as required by the statute. The Commission expects that it will concurrently or subsequently initiate notice and comment rulemaking proceedings, pursuant to the Administrative Procedures Act, to modify or eliminate selected rules identified in the Commission report. Pursuant to Section 1.430 of the Commission's rules, we seek comment on the staff report and rule analysis being released today. In particular, we request comment on (1) the analysis of the statutory requirements for this biennial review; (2) whether staff's analysis is an appropriate way to determine whether a rule is necessary in the public interest; (3) the process used for conducting the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/FCC-04-189A1.html
  • be changed, and if so, why. Finally, although we have identified above particular subjects that we believe of interest to the public regarding EAS and public alert and warning in general, we welcome comment on any other ideas relevant to the issues addressed in this NPRM. V. PROCEDURAL MATTERS 49. Comments and Reply Comments. Pursuant to sections 1.415, 1.419, and 1.430 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.415, 1.419, 1.430, interested parties may file comments on or before 60 days after publication of this NPRM in the Federal Register, and reply comments on or before 90 days after publication of this NPRM in the Federal Register. All filings should refer to EB Docket No. 04-296. Comments may be filed using the
• http://www.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Databases/documents_collection/90-374.pdf
  • ofthespectrum.BrantleyarguesthatNAB'sfearofa massmigrationofstationsfromruraltourbancommu- nitiesisunfounded,andthatNABseekstorestrictthe Commissionfromexercisinganyversatilityunderthis procedure.BrantleyclaimsthatNABfailstoconsiderthat minimumdistanceseparationrequirements'willprevent moststationsfromrelocatingtheirantennasitestourban areas. 8.WordofGodsupportsSinclair'spetitionforreconsideration .claimingthattheCommissionadopteditsre- strictiononremovalofsolelocalbroadcastservice withoutadequatenoticeandopportunityforcomment. WordofGodarguesthatifthesolelocalbroadcastservice limitationisretained,theCommissionshouldexempt unbuiltfacilitiesfromthelimitation.WordofGodclaims thatthisexemptionisjustifiedbecauseanunbuiltfacility FederalCommunicationsCommissionRecord FCC90-374 cannotbeconsideredtoprovideexistingservicetoa community.ItarguesthattheCommissionshouldconsider inthecaseofunbuiltfacilitieswhetherotherchannels inthesameserviceareaareavailabletothe community,eitherasallottedbutunassignedchannelsor throughapetitionforrulemaking,andtheextentto whichthecommunitycouldreceiveservicefromthe unbuiltfacilityifitmoved.WordofGodclaimsthatthe Commissionshouldbaseitsevaluationonthetotalityof serviceimprovementsavailable. 9.KudzualsosupportsSinclair'spetitionforreconsideration .Kudzuclaimsthatdeletingtherestrictionon removalofsolelocaltransmissionservicewouldbeconsistent withotherCommissionrules,suchasthemain studiorule,thataredesignedtoenhancelicenseeflexibility . 10.Initspetitionforreconsideration.Harronargues thattheCommissionshouldnotlimittheuseoftherule toinstancesinwhichalicenseefilesarulemakingpetition andasimultaneousrequestformodificationoflicense .Harronnotesthatthisrequirementprohibitsuseof theprocedurebyatelevisionlicenseeseekingtoreassign tothecommunityspecifiedintheTelevisionTableof Allotmentsachannellicensedtoanothercommunitypursuant totheCommission'sformer"15mile"rule.8 Harronbelievesthatforcingtheselicenseestofileamajor changeapplicationvirtuallyguaranteesthatserviceimprovements bythatstationwillnotoccur.Harronargues thatthisprocedurecreatesanartificialdistinctionbetween twogroupsoflicenseesinwhichtheCommission treatsamodificationoflicensetospecifyacommunity addedbyanamendmenttotheTableofAllotmentsasa minorchange,whereasamodificationoflicensetospecify thecommunitylistedintheTelevisionTableofAllotments isclassifiedasamajorchangeandsubjectto competingapplications.HarronproposesthattheCommission amendSection73.3573(a)(1)ofitsrulesto reclassifyasaminorchangeanapplicationformodification oflicenseinwhichalicenseeseekstoreassigna channeltoitsallottedcommunity.' DISCUSSION 11.Section307(b).WithrespecttoNAB'srequestto stateinthetextofCommissionrule1.430(1)thattherule canonlyheusedtofurtherthegoalsofSection307(b). webelieveitisaxiomaticthatourallotmentprioritiesand policiesareandshouldbeappliedconsistentwithandin furtheranceofthegoalsofSection307(b)oftheAct.As westatedintheR&O.proposalsfiledpursuanttothe newrulewillbeexaminedinlightofourlongstanding allotmentprioritiesandpolicies.andmustadvancethe prioritiesinordertobegranted.Althoughwedidnot specificallystateintheR&Othattheseprioritiesand policieswereadoptedandhavebeenappliedconsistent withandinordertoadvancethegoalsofSection307(b), thatpropositionisamplyevidentfromthedocuments adoptingandapplyingtheprioritiesandpolicies.Toinsure thatourintentisclear,however.weherebystate unequivocallythatSection1.430(1)wasadoptedtofurther theCommission'slongstandingpursuitofthegoals underlyingSection307(b)oftheAct.andthat.any changesintheFMandTVTablesofAllotmentsmustbe consistentwiththosegoals.Furthermore.wetakethis opportunitytoclarifyandexpandupontheR&O.In doingso.weaddresstheNAB'sspecificconcernsthatthe FCC90-374 flexibilityinherentintheCommission's"residual"allotment priorityof"otherpublicinterestmatters"willlead toresultsinconsistentwithSection307(b),andthatthe newprocedurecouldresultinthemigrationofstations fromruraltourbanareas.contrarytotheintentofSection 307(b).Therefore,wedonotbelieveitnecessaryto specificallyincorporatestatutoryprovisionsintherule. Notonlyissuchareferenceunnecessary,butincludingit inonlyoneofthemanyruleswhichcarryoutthe objectivesofSection307(b)couldleadtoconfusionand needlessquibblingovertheobjectivesofotherrules. 12.WithrespecttotheNAB'sconcernthatthe"other publicinterestmatters"categoryofourFMandTVallotment prioritiesmayprovidetoomuchflexibilitytolicensees andpermitteesseekingchangesofcommunity,it appearsthattheNABisconcernedthatifaproposaldoes notimplicatehigherprioritiessuchasfirstreceptionservice orfirstlocalservice,itwillautomaticallybeapproved .Wewishtodispelanysuchconcern.Consistent withlongstandingpracticeapplyingtheseresidualcategories, iftheCommissionispresentedwithconflicting options.suchastheoptionofretainingtheexistingarrangement ofallotmentsoradoptinganewarrangement ofallotments,itwilladopttheproposalwhichbestdischarges theCommission'sstatutorymandate.Amongother factorsrelevantpursuanttoSection307(b).the Commissionconsidersundertheseresidualcategoriesthe locationoftheproposedallotmentwithrespecttoother communities.andtheavailabilityofotherservicesinthe communitiesaffectedbytheproposedchange.Under thesecircumstances,itisproperfortheCommissionto considerwhetheraproposalwouldresultinshiftingof servicefromanunderservedruraltoawell-servedurban areaandthepublicinterestconsequencesofanysuch change.'° 13.WithrespecttotheNAB'sconcernthatthenew procedurewillresultinthewholesalemigrationofstations fromruraltourbanareas,asweindicatedinthe
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files06/CREPOR06.PDF
  • in the United States (by Country of Origin) in the United States Billed Percent Share by Carrier Receipts Percent Share by Carrier Receipts Percent Share by Carrier Total Percent Share by Carrier Revenues 1 2 3 4 Other from PTT 1 2 3 4 Other from PTT 1 2 3 4 Other Minutes 1 2 3 4 Other Andorra $177,714 1.430.4 0.031.4 36.7 $1,408 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $45 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 2,454,842 0.210.2 0.049.9 39.6 Austria $11,694,079 1.122.3 0.723.9 52.0 $1,634,603 0.038.8 0.048.1 13.1 $2,713 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 141,462,544 0.617.9 0.644.2 36.7 Belgium $23,084,490 0.034.0 1.912.3 51.8 $2,233,776 0.012.6 0.037.9 49.5 $2,882,868 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 270,815,840 0.018.1 3.733.5 44.7 Cyprus $1,565,113 0.121.4 0.122.1 56.2 $98,760 0.039.3 0.029.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/echostar-directv/nrtc_exparte072902.pdf
  • Video, Voice, And Data Services By Broadband Service Providers...................13 IV. Conclusion.............................................................................................................................15 BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC In the Matter of ) ) Annual Assessment of the Status of ) MB Docket No. 02-145 Competition in Markets for the ) Delivery of Video Programming ) ) To: The Commission COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL RURAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE Pursuant to Section 1.430 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations, the National Rural Telecommunications Cooperative (NRTC), by its attorneys, hereby submits these Comments in response to the Notice of Inquiry (NOI) issued by the Commission in the above-captioned proceeding.1 I. Summary As NRTC has made clear in previous Competition Reports, in order to gauge the status of competition in the multichannel video programming distribution