FCC Web Documents citing 1.47

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-576A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-576A1.pdf
  • FCC Rcd 12682, 12684 (2004) (dismissing opposition late-filed by 30 days). See National Ready Mixed Concrete Co., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 5250, 5251 n.12 (2008). See also Charles T. Crawford, et al. Memorandum Opinion and Order, 17 FCC Rcd 19328, 19329 (2002) (Commission not obligated to consider informal requests). Smartcomm Motion at 2. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.47 (Service of Documents and Proof of Service). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 10-576 Federal Communications Commission DA 10-576 � � � � j l � l � 0 l � 0 . / 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 : ; < = > ? @ A B C D E F
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275668A1.pdf
  • different builder) at the time of the tests. 2-3 Table 2-2. Test Configurationsat Each Site Site 0: No Wall Site 1: Exterior House Wall Site 2: Inter-Unit Townhouse Wall Transmit Antenna: --Location Outdoors Garage Townhouse A, ground floor --Mount Wood/fiberglass mast Wood/fiberglass mast Wood tripod --Floor Asphalt driveway Concrete slab Carpeted concrete slab --Height (center of antenna) 0.97 m and 1.47 m 0.97 m and 1.47 m for2-m distance 0.97 m and 2.39m for10- m distance 0.88m and 1.26m at 2-m distance 0.88m and 1.45m at 10- m distance TV: --Location Outdoors Outdoors Townhouse B, ground floor --Mount 0.85-m tall plastic cart 0.85-m tall plastic cart 0.85-m tall plastic cart --Floor Asphalt driveway Asphalt driveway extensionat 2-m distance Grass at 10-m
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-14A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-14A1.pdf
  • service problem alleged here by NetworkIP, LLC. Thus, Network cannot complain about the Commission's attempts to work around NetworkIP LLC's rule violation and provide Network actual notice of the informal complaint. Moreover, especially in light of the absence of a registered agent, the address used to serve the March 2002 Informal Complaint qualifies as the ``last known address'' under rule 1.47(d), because (i) the individual addressee, Doug Williams, worked for a closely related affiliate of NetworkIP, LLC; (ii) the business addressee, ``Network IP, Inc.'', is so close to ``NetworkIP, LLC'' that any reasonable person would have suspected that NetworkIP, LLC was the intended recipient; (iii) though not of NetworkIP's headquarters, the address used was of a NetworkIP, LLC office containing collocation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1604A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1604A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1604A1.txt
  • was submitted to the FCC within thirty days of the Public Notice announcing the grant of ADF's application, authorizing ADF to operate on the subject frequencies under call sign WPLQ307. The Revere Public Notice required the City of Revere to serve a copy of the Revere Letter on ADF, and to file proof of such service in accordance with Section 1.47(g) of the Commission's Rules, within three business days of the date of release of the Public Notice. 8. As explained in the 1999 MO&O, after receiving the Revere Letter and performing a balancing test of public interest considerations versus any procedural shortcomings on the part of the Revere Police Department, the Bureau released the Revere Public Notice, which made the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1632A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1632A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1632A1.txt
  • Orland Park Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 9495, � 9. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.106. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.52 See Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Revises and Begins Phased Implementation of Its Unified Policy for Reviewing License Applications and Pleadings, Public Notice, 14 FCC Rcd 11,182, 11,187-88 (Wireless Tel. Bur. 1999). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.106. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(b). We note also that petitioner failed to file four copies of its pleading (47 C.F.R. � 1.51), and that it was not otherwise in proper form. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.49. POCC claims that the petition was faxed on June 22, 1999, but staff of the Enforcement Division did not receive a fax of the petition until August 5, 1999.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1001A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1001A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1001A1.txt
  • payment of the full amount of this Notice of Apparent Liability under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief, Revenue and Receivables Operations Group, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1914. Commission records indicate that Neclec, Inc. apparently has not designated an agent for service of Commission decisions, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h). Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be posted in the Office of the Secretary. In addition, a copy will be sent by Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested, to Neclec, LLC, 190 Old Derby, Suite 310, Hingham, MA 02043. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau Numbering Resource Optimization,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1002A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1002A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1002A1.txt
  • payment of the full amount of this Notice of Apparent Liability under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief, Revenue and Receivables Operations Group, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1914. Commission records indicate that Net-Tel Corporation apparently has not designated an agent for service of Commission decisions, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h). Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be posted in the Office of the Secretary. In addition, a copy will be sent by Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested, to Net-Tel Corporation, 1023 31st Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20007. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau Numbering Resource Optimization, Report
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1004A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1004A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1004A1.txt
  • the full amount of this Notice of Apparent Liability under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief, Revenue and Receivables Operations Group, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1914. Commission records indicate that North American Telecommunications Corporation apparently has not designated an agent for service of Commission decisions, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h). Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be posted in the Office of the Secretary. In addition, a copy will be sent by Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested, to North American Telecommunications Corporation, 875 Merrick Ave., Westbury, NY 11590. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau Numbering Resource Optimization,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1005A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1005A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1005A1.txt
  • the full amount of this Notice of Apparent Liability under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief, Revenue and Receivables Operations Group, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1914. Commission records indicate that North County Communications Corp. apparently has not designated an agent for service of Commission decisions, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h). Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be posted in the Office of the Secretary. In addition, a copy will be sent by Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested, to North County Communications Corp., 3802 Rosecrans #485, San Diego, CA 92110. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau Numbering Resource
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1006A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1006A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1006A1.txt
  • the full amount of this Notice of Apparent Liability under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief, Revenue and Receivables Operations Group, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1914. Commission records indicate that Optel Texas Telecom, Inc. apparently has not designated an agent for service of Commission decisions, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h). Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be posted in the Office of the Secretary. In addition, a copy will be sent by Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested, to Optel Texas Telecom, Inc., 1111 W. Mockingbird Lane, Suite 1000, Dallas, TX 75247. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1007A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1007A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1007A1.txt
  • the full amount of this Notice of Apparent Liability under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief, Revenue and Receivables Operations Group, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1914. Commission records indicate that Paging Source USA, LLC apparently has not designated an agent for service of Commission decisions, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h). Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be posted in the Office of the Secretary. In addition, a copy will be sent by Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested, to Paging Source USA LLC, 240-19 Jamaica Ave, Bellerose, NY 11426. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau Numbering Resource Optimization,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1008A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1008A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1008A1.txt
  • full amount of this Notice of Apparent Liability under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief, Revenue and Receivables Operations Group, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1914. Commission records indicate that R and G Distributors, Inc. apparently has not designated an agent for service of Commission decisions, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h). Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be posted in the Office of the Secretary. In addition, a copy will be sent by Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested, to R and G Distributors, Inc., 1665 W. 68th Street, Suite 201, Hialeah, FL 33014 and to its agent registered with the Secretary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1009A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1009A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1009A1.txt
  • of the full amount of this Notice of Apparent Liability under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief, Revenue and Receivables Operations Group, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1914. Commission records indicate that Trivergent Communications, Inc. apparently has not designated an agent for service of Commission decisions, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h). Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be posted in the Office of the Secretary. In addition, a copy will be sent by Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested, to Trivergent Communications, Inc., 301 N. Main Street, Suite 5000, Greenville, SC 29601. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau Numbering
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1011A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1011A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1011A1.txt
  • the full amount of this Notice of Apparent Liability under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief, Revenue and Receivables Operations Group, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1914. Commission records indicate that Vanguard Cellular Systems, Inc. apparently has not designated an agent for service of Commission decisions, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h). Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be posted in the Office of the Secretary. In addition, a copy will be sent by Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested, to Vanguard Cellular Systems, Inc., 7277 164th Ave. N.E., Redmond, WA 98052. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau Numbering Resource
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1012A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1012A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1012A1.txt
  • of the full amount of this Notice of Apparent Liability under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief, Revenue and Receivables Operations Group, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1914. Commission records indicate that Winsome Paging, Inc. apparently has not designated an agent for service of Commission decisions, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h). Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be posted in the Office of the Secretary. In addition, a copy will be sent by Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested, to Winsome Paging, Inc., 429 Broadway, Bayonne, NJ 07002. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau Numbering Resource Optimization, Report and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1044A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1044A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1044A1.txt
  • determining the exact number of public and semi-public payphones may be difficult. We therefore encourage the parties to consider proxies that can be used to obtain a reasonable estimation of that number. Bureau Participation The Enforcement Bureau shall be a party to the proceeding and will determine its level of participation, as appropriate, on an issue-by-issue basis. Pursuant to section 1.47(c) of the Commission's rules, the Bureau shall be served with documents in the same manner as other parties. damages instructions Measure of Damages The scope of the hearing is limited to determining the proper amount of damages to which Complainants are entitled. The measure of damages is the amount of EUCL payments Defendants assessed and collected from the Complainants for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-140A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-140A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-140A1.txt
  • LP, Order on Reconsideration, 14 FCC Rcd 2782 (WTB PSPWD 1999) (finding that a petition for reconsideration sent to the Commission's lock box at Mellon Bank neither complied with the Commission's Rules nor ameliorated the late filing with the Secretary's office), aff'd., Order on Reconsideration, 15 FCC Rcd 10251 (WTB PSPWD 2000). 47 C.F.R. � 1.106(f). We note that Section 1.47(g) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(g), states that failure to make proof of service will not affect the validity of the service. The Commission may allow the proof to be amended or supplied at any time, unless to do so would result in material prejudice to a party. In the instant matter, we are not requiring PM Realty
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1829A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1829A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1829A1.txt
  • not ruled on these pending discovery requests and leave to the discretion of the ALJ the manner and extent of discovery. Bureau Participation The Enforcement Bureau shall be a party to the proceedings before the ALJ and, subject to specific requests from the ALJ, will determine its level of participation as to each issue in the case. Pursuant to section 1.47(c) of the Commission's rules, the Bureau shall be served with documents in the same manner as other parties. damages instructions The parties correctly agree that the ultimate issues in dispute are whether complainants are entitled to damages for U S WEST's violation of section 271, and if so, what is the appropriate amount of such damages. Accordingly, the scope of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2369A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2369A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2369A1.txt
  • dismissal as procedurally defective. The ICG Petition, on the other hand, was timely because it was filed on February 15, 2001. However, ICG failed to serve its Petition on Spectrum or its counsel. Section 1.939(c) of the Commission's Rules requires a petitioner to deny to serve the petition ``on the applicant and on all other interested parties pursuant to � 1.47.'' As the proposed transferee, Spectrum was entitled to service as a party to the application. Accordingly, we dismiss the ICG Petition as defective for failure to comply with the service requirement set-forth in Section 1.939 of the Commission's Rules. CONCLUSION AND ORDERING CLAUSES We dismiss the petitions to deny filed against the Americom Application for failure to comply with the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2392A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2392A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2392A1.txt
  • other matter which may be of decisional significance in a Commission proceeding involving the pending application, the applicant shall as promptly as possible and in any event within 30 days, unless good cause is shown, submit a statement furnishing such additional or corrected information as may be appropriate, which shall be served upon parties of record in accordance with � 1.47. 47 C.F.R. � 1.102(b)(2). 47 C.F.R. �� 0.321, 1.43 and 1.102(b)(2). (...continued from previous page) (continued...) Federal Communications Commission DA 01-2392 Federal Communications Commission DA 01-2392 - - @& ''... ... �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2581A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2581A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2581A1.txt
  • 7941, 7943 � 7 (WTB PSPWD 2001). Commco also argues that the Petition is procedurally improper because Mr. Beyerle served the Petition on Commco by electronic mail without Commco's consent and because Mr. Beyerle allegedly did not sign the Petition. Opposition at 2-3. We decline to dismiss the Petition on these bases. While Commco is correct that 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(d) requires that documents be served in paper form, we decline to dismiss the Petition because Commco has not demonstrated any prejudice from the fact that it was served by electronic mail. As to Commco's second argument, Mr. Beyerle cured that deficiency when he signed the letter attached to the version of the Petition that he resubmitted to the Commission on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2748A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2748A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2748A1.txt
  • of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151-154, 201-205, and Sections 1.1 and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1, 1.3, this Order is ADOPTED. 9. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Section 1.4(f) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.4(f), IS WAIVED for the purpose specified in paragraph 5 supra. 10. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Section 1.47(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(d), IS WAIVED for the purpose specified in paragraph 7 supra. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tamara L. Preiss Chief, Competitive Pricing Division Common Carrier Bureau Multi-Association Group (MAG) Plan for Regulation of Interstate Services of Non-Price Cap Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers and Interexchange Carriers, CC Docket No. 00-256, Second Report and Order and Further
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-474A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-474A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-474A1.txt
  • Memorandum Opinion and Order, 40 FCC 2d 1102, 1103 � 6 (1973). That standard, however, is not applicable here, because there is no claim or evidence in Tower's Petition that the decision granting the assignment application was procured by fraud on the Commission's application process or that the result is manifestly unconscionable. 47 C.F.R. � 1.106(f). We note that Section 1.47(g) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.47, states that failure to make proof of service will not affect the validity of service. The Commission may allow the proof to be amended or supplied at any time, unless to do so would result in material prejudice to a party. In the instant matter, we are not requiring Tower to provide
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-548A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-548A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-548A1.txt
  • April 2001 Worksheet (FCC Form 499-A) and instructions may be downloaded from the Commission's Forms Web Page (www.fcc.gov/formpage.html). Finally, copies may be obtained from NECA at (973) 560-4400. For further information, contact Suzanne McCrary, Jim Lande or Scott Bergmann, Industry Analysis Division, Common Carrier Bureau, at (202) 418-0940. 47 C.F.R. �� 52.1(b), 52.32(b), 54.711(a), 64.604(c)(4)(iii)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h) (requiring every common carrier to file information concerning their designated agents pursuant to the Telecommunications Reporting Worksheet). 47 C.F.R. � 64.1195; see also Implementation of the Subscriber Carrier Selection Changes Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Policies and Rules Concerning Unauthorized Changes of Consumers Long Distance Carriers, Order, FCC 01-67, CC Docket No. 94-129, �� 8-13 (rel. Feb. 22,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-581A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-581A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-581A1.txt
  • CC Docket No. 96-45 CC Docket No. 98-77 CC Docket No. 98-166 Adopted: March 5, 2001 Released: March 5, 2001 By the Chief, Common Carrier Bureau: On February 21, 2001, the Illinois Commerce Commission filed a motion seeking an extension of time in which to file comments and reply comments in the above-captioned rulemaking proceedings pursuant to sections 1.46(b) and 1.47 of the Commission's rules. Specifically, the Illinois Commerce Commission requests that the date on which comments are due be extended from February 26, 2001, to March 7, 2001, and that the date on which reply comments are due be extended from March 12, 2001, to March 21, 2001. In support of its request, it states that the next regularly scheduled
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-838A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-838A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-838A1.txt
  • 2 supra. 10. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Section 61.49(k) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �61.49(k), IS WAIVED for the purpose specified in paragraph 5 supra. 11. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Section 1.4(f) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.4(f), IS WAIVED for the purpose specified in paragraph 6 supra. 12. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Section 1.47(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(d), IS WAIVED for the purpose specified in paragraph 8 supra. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jane E. Jackson Chief, Competitive Pricing Division Common Carrier Bureau 47 U.S.C. � 204(a)(3). Tariffs to be effective July 1 on 15 days' notice would have to be filed on Saturday, June 16; tariffs to be effective July 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-947A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-947A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-947A1.txt
  • developing a fuller factual record. We therefore exercise our discretionary authority to consider all of the information submitted in this proceeding. Southern further asserts that Nextel's service of its March 8 submission was improper because Nextel served only Southern's in-house counsel, and not its outside counsel concurrently. We find that Nextel's service complies with our rules. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(d). Finally, each of the parties has had ample opportunity to respond to the pleadings, and therefore has not been prejudiced. Accordingly, the three motions are denied. We note that our approval of this transaction is consistent with the position of U.S. Department of Justice (``DOJ''), which has not challenged Nextel's proposed acquisition of Motorola's licenses. 47 U.S.C. � 310(d). Section
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-991A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-991A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-991A1.txt
  • for payment of the full amount of this Notice of Apparent Liability under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief, Revenue and Receivables Operations Group, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1914. Commission records indicate that Allpage apparently has not designated an agent for service of Commission decisions, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h). Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be posted in the Office of the Secretary. In addition, a copy will be sent by Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested, to Allpage, 3141 Bordentown Avenue, Parlin, New Jersey, 08859. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau Numbering Resource Optimization, Report and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-992A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-992A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-992A1.txt
  • of the full amount of this Notice of Apparent Liability under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief, Revenue and Receivables Operations Group, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1914. Commission records indicate that American Metrocomm Corp. apparently has not designated an agent for service of Commission decisions, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h). Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be posted in the Office of the Secretary. In addition, a copy will be sent by Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested, to American Metrocomm Corp., 1615 Poydras Street, New Orleans, LA 70112. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau Numbering Resource Optimization,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-994A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-994A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-994A1.txt
  • of the full amount of this Notice of Apparent Liability under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief, Revenue and Receivables Operations Group, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1914. Commission records indicate that CDS Networks, Inc. apparently has not designated an agent for service of Commission decisions, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h). Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be posted in the Office of the Secretary. In addition, a copy will be sent by Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested, to CDS Networks, Inc., 2661 S. Pacific Highway, Medford, OR 97502 and to its agent registered with the Secretary of State of Oregon,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-996A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-996A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-996A1.txt
  • of the full amount of this Notice of Apparent Liability under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief, Revenue and Receivables Operations Group, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1914. Commission records indicate that Core Communications, Inc. apparently has not designated an agent for service of Commission decisions, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h). Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be posted in the Office of the Secretary. In addition, a copy will be sent by Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested, to Core Communications, Inc., 209 West Street, Suite 302, Annapolis, MD 21401. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau Numbering Resource
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-997A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-997A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-997A1.txt
  • of the full amount of this Notice of Apparent Liability under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief, Revenue and Receivables Operations Group, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1914. Commission records indicate that Digital Teleport, Inc. apparently has not designated an agent for service of Commission decisions, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h). Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be posted in the Office of the Secretary. In addition, a copy will be sent by Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested, to Digital Teleport Inc., 8112 Maryland Ave., 4th Floor, St. Louis, MO 63105. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau Numbering
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-998A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-998A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-998A1.txt
  • payment of the full amount of this Notice of Apparent Liability under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief, Revenue and Receivables Operations Group, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1914. Commission records indicate that Fulltel, Inc. apparently has not designated an agent for service of Commission decisions, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h). Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be posted in the Office of the Secretary. In addition, a copy will be sent by Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested, to Fulltel, Inc., 210 Robert S. Kerr, Oklahoma City, OK 73102. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau Numbering Resource Optimization,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-999A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-999A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-999A1.txt
  • for payment of the full amount of this Notice of Apparent Liability under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief, Revenue and Receivables Operations Group, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1914. Commission records indicate that IDS apparently has not designated an agent for service of Commission decisions, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h). Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be posted in the Office of the Secretary. In addition, a copy will be sent by Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested, to IDS Long Distance, 1525 N.W. 167th Street, Suite 200, Miami, FL 33169. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau Numbering
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-113A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-113A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-113A1.txt
  • to counsel's name. According to KHCV, it would be illogical for the administrative assistant to sign but not actually send the letter. See Declaration of Tracy L. Trynock, Director of Administration for the law firm of Irwin, Campbell & Tannenwald, P.C., dated October 23, 2001, attached as part of Exhibit A, KHCV Reply. Reply at 2; see 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(f). Reply at 2, citing United States v. Bowman, 783 F.2d 1192, 1197 (5th Cir. 1986); United States v. Ledesma, 632 F.2d 670, 675 (7th Cir. 1980) (``Testimony as to office practice is sufficient proof of mailing.''), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 998 (1980). Reply at 3, 6. Id. See 17 U.S.C. � 122. Reply at 3, 6. Id. at 6. Id.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-222A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-222A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-222A1.txt
  • of long-term local number portability. See 47 C.F.R. � 64.1195(h) (requiring underlying carriers to confirm that a potential carrier-customer is registered with the Commission prior to providing that carrier-customer with service). 47 C.F.R. �� 64.1195(e) and (f). See also 47 U.S.C. � 413 (requiring designation of agent for service of process). 47 U.S.C. � 413. See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h) (stating that every common carrier subject to the Act ``shall designate an agent in the District of Columbia'' for service of process). 47 C.F.R. � 64.1195(g). 2 PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202 / 418-2830 TTY 202 / 418-2555 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov +D�� +D`� +D`� �����PNG
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-326A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-326A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-326A1.txt
  • Id. Id. at 5. Id. at 4. Id. Id. at 4-5. Id. at 6-7; Gannon, 10 FCC Rcd 8619 (CSB 1995). Answer at 6-7, citing Gannon, 10 FCC Rcd 8619 (CSB 1995). Answer at 9-10. Reply at 2. Id., citing Complaint at 1, Exhibit 1. Reply at 3, Exhibit A. Id. Id. Id. Reply at 3; see 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(f). Reply at 3-4, citing United States v. Bowman, 783 F.2d 1192, 1197 (5th Cir. 1986); United States v. Ledesma, 632 F.2d 670, 675 (7th Cir. 1980)(``Testimony as to office practice is sufficient proof of mailing.''), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 998 (1980). Reply at 5, 9. Id. See 17 U.S.C. � 122. Reply at 5, 9. Id. at 9. Id. DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-327A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-327A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-327A1.txt
  • Id. Id. at 5. Id. at 4. Id. Id. at 4-5. Id. at 6-7; Gannon, 10 FCC Rcd 8619 (CSB 1995). Answer at 6-7, citing Gannon, 10 FCC Rcd 8619 (CSB 1995). Answer at 9-10. Reply at 2. Id., citing Complaint at 1, Exhibit 1. Reply at 3, Exhibit A. Id. Id. Id. Reply at 3; see 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(f). Reply at 3-4, citing United States v. Bowman, 783 F.2d 1192, 1197 (5th Cir. 1986); United States v. Ledesma, 632 F.2d 670, 675 (7th Cir. 1980)(``Testimony as to office practice is sufficient proof of mailing.''), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 998 (1980). Reply at 5, 9. Id. See 17 U.S.C. � 122. Reply at 5, 9. Id. at 9. Id. DBS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-529A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-529A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-529A1.txt
  • 499-A) and instructions may be downloaded from the Commission's Forms Web Page (www.fcc.gov/formpage.html). Finally, copies may be obtained from the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) at (973) 560-4400. For further information, contact Suzanne McCrary, Jim Lande or Kenneth Lynch, Industry Analysis Division, Common Carrier Bureau, at (202) 418-0940. 47 C.F.R. �� 52.1(b), 52.32(b), 54.711(a), 64.604(c)(5)(iii)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h) (requiring every common carrier to file information concerning their designated agents pursuant to the Telecommunications Reporting Worksheet). 1998 Biennial Regulatory Review -- Streamlined Contributor Reporting Requirements Associated with Administration of Telecommunications Relay Services, North American Numbering Plan, Local Number Portability, and Universal Service Support Mechanisms, CC Docket No. 98-171, Report and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 16602 (1999) (Contributor Reporting Requirements
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-970A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-970A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-970A1.txt
  • paragraph 5 supra. 14. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commissions rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, section 1.4(f) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.4(f), IS WAIVED for the purpose specified in paragraph 6 supra. 15. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commissions rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, section 1.47(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(d), IS WAIVED for the purpose specified in paragraph 8 supra. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tamara Preiss Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau 47 U.S.C. � 204(a)(3). Pursuant to this section of the Act, ILECs may file certain tariffs that take effect 15 days after they are filed. To be effective on July
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-990A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-990A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-990A1.txt
  • the GDPPI. Annual 1987 Access Tariff Filings, Petitions for Waivers of Filing Requirements, Mimeo No. 6945 (rel. Sept. 16, 1986) (1987 Waiver Order). In the Matter of July 2, 2002 Annual Access Charge Tariff Filing, WCB/Pricing 02-12, Order, DA 02-970 (Pricing Policy Division, released Apr. 26, 2002). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.773(a)(4) and (b)(3). We waive any inconsistent portions of section 1.47(d) of the Commission's rules. ' ( �� �� �� ��¿�����������������������������(c)��������������� � /(2��o祴��Q^W�] ���*��� E�7���''V�?��B�"�| �� ���� ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1175A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1175A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1175A1.txt
  • paragraph 6 supra. 14. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, section 1.4(f) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.4(f), IS WAIVED for the purpose specified in paragraph 7 supra. 15. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, section 1.47(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(d), IS WAIVED for the purpose specified in paragraph 10 supra. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Deena M. Shetler Deputy Division Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 69.3(a). 47 C.F.R. � 61.13(b). 47 C.F.R. � 61.43. 47 C.F.R. � 61.38. 47 C.F.R. � 69.3(f)(1). 47 C.F.R. � 61.39. 47 C.F.R. �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-97A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-97A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-97A1.txt
  • year's survey audience estimates were based on the November 1999/February 2000 sweep periods and the second year's estimates were based on November 2000/February 2001 data. The submitted audience information is as follows: Survey Households Share Standard Net Standard Year Studied Viewing Error Weekly Error Hours Circulation Lansing: Nov. 99/ 14 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Feb. 00 Nov. 00/ 13 1.4 1.47 5.9 5.69 Feb. 01 East Lansing: Nov. 99/ 57 0.9 0.40 12.7 5.29 Feb. 00 Nov. 00/ 50 0.9 0.44 13.8 5.41 Feb. 01 WILX-TV argues that the above submission meets the standards established in KCST-TV and has been found acceptable in other Bureau decisions. WILX-TV asserts that this study establishes that, for two consecutive years, WOOD-TV has not met
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1049A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1049A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1049A1.txt
  • paragraph 8 supra. 18. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, section 1.4(f) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.4(f), IS WAIVED for the purpose specified in paragraph 9 supra. 19. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, section 1.47(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(d), IS WAIVED for the purpose specified in paragraph 15 supra. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tamara L. Preiss Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau The price cap ILECs that must file a short form TRP on April 30, 2004, are Alltel Telephone System, Ameritech Operating Companies, BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., Cincinnati Bell Telephone, Citizens
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-181A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-181A1.txt
  • of underground, aerial, and buried operations to incorporate the 18.44 percent of underground plant. AT&T/WorldCom assume that half of the above ground operations are for aerial plant and half occur at pedestals for buried plant. We thus use the following weights: 18.44 percent underground, 40.78 percent aerial, and 40.78 percent buried. This produces a weighted average of 80.22 minutes, or 1.47 times AT&T/WorldCom's estimate of 54.5 minutes. (The sums of the work times were all identified on the AT&T/WorldCom Compliance Filing, CD-ROM AT&T/MCI Joint Testimony, Excel file "ATT_MCI VA Compliance DSL NRCs.xls," Worksheet "Bridged Tap Removal.") We therefore multiply AT&T/WorldCom's proposed rate by 1.47. 52 Verizon Rebuttal, Minion Rebuttal Decl. at para. 13. Federal Communications Commission DA 04-181 10 Coordination Center
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1999A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1999A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1999A1.txt
  • all minutes of service provided, and therefore, the 40% tax allowance rate is reduced by 20%, which results in a rate of 32%; and (5) using the 32% rate, and applying the formula to convert from an after-tax allowance to a pre-tax allowance, the result is that the .9375% monthly rate of return must be adjusted by multiplying it by 1.47, which equals a monthly working capital allowance of 1.4% (that is applied to the per-minute compensation rate that is based on the providers' projected costs and minutes, adjusted as necessary). See 2004 NECA Filing at 7, Exs. 1C, 1D, & 1E. The formula for converting from an after-tax basis to a pre-tax basis is: 1 + X/(1-X), where X =
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3048A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3048A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3048A1.txt
  • moving party with respect to the Petition, it bears the burden of proceeding with the introduction of evidence and the burden of proving it is entitled to compensation above marginal cost with respect to specific poles. Bureau Participation The Enforcement Bureau shall be a party to the proceeding and will determine its level of participation, as appropriate. Pursuant to section 1.47(c) of the Commission's rules, the Bureau shall be served with documents in the same manner as other parties. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 224, and 405 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 154(j), 224, 405, and sections 0.111, 0.311, 1.106, and 1.1411 of the Commission's rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3553A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3553A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3553A1.txt
  • to an additional extent, as the Commission acknowledged. tes that the Commission assumed when calculating the channel re-use limit. After adjusting for the previously-noted differential between average power reduction that would result from MSV's proposed vocoder/duty-cycle operation and the average reduction that would result from operation in strict compliance with Section 25.253(a)(2), there is still a net power reduction of 1.47 dB more than the Commission assumed. This warrants a 40% increase in channel re-use. We therefore grant a partial waiver to allow MSV to simultaneously operate up to 2415 co-frequency ATC base stations in the United States. To provide an adequate transition, however, MSV shall not operate more than 1208 base stations on the same channel during the first eighteen
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3669A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3669A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3669A1.txt
  • 1990, Administration of the North American Numbering Plan and North American Numbering Plan Cost Recovery Contribution Factor and Fund Size, Number Resource Optimization, Telephone Number Portability, Truth-in-Billing and Billing Format, Report and Order, CC Docket Nos. 96-45, 98-171, 90-571, 92-237, 99-200, 95-116, 98-170, FCC 99-175 (rel. July 14, 1999), at para. 1 (Form Consolidation Order). See 47 C.F.R. �� 64.1195(a), 1.47. 47 U.S.C. � 254(d). See 47 C.F.R. � 54.706(b). See Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, 1998 Biennial Regulatory Review - Streamlined Contributor Reporting Requirements Associated with Administration of Telecommunications Relay Service, North American Numbering Plan, Local Number Portability, and Universal Service Support Mechanisms, Telecommunications Services for Individuals with Hearing and Speech Disabilities, and the Americans With Disabilities Act of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-549A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-549A3.txt
  • the Commission; or (b) any employee of the Commission; or (c) the United States government, is a party to a proceeding before the body or has an interest in the proceeding. With the exception of your employer identification number, if you do not provide the information we request on the Worksheet, the Commission may consider you in violation of sections 1.47, 52.17, 52.32, 54.713, 64.604, and 64.1195 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.47, 52.17, 52.32, 54.713, 64.604, and 64.1195. The foregoing Notice is required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, P.L. No. 104-13, 44 U.S.C. � 3501, et seq. * * * * * Table of Contents I. Introduction 3 II. Filing Requirements and General Instructions 4 A.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1039A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1039A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1039A1.txt
  • 16. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, sections 1.4(f) and 1.773(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.4(f), 1.773(b) ARE WAIVED for the purpose specified in paragraph 8 supra. 17. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, section 1.47(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(d), IS WAIVED for the purpose specified in paragraph 13 supra. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tamara L. Preiss Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau The price cap ILECs that must file a short form TRP on May 2, 2005, are ALLTEL Telephone System, Ameritech Operating Companies, BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., Cincinnati Bell Telephone, Citizens
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1317A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1317A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1317A1.txt
  • 1. Joint Opposition at 1. See Motion to Dismiss at 1, 4-6. The Applicants further argue that the Petition lacks the required certification and fails to establish that Alpine has standing to challenge the assignment, pursuant to section 1.939(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.939(d), and was not properly served upon the Debtor or Cricket, pursuant to sections 1.47 and 1.939(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.47, 1.939(d). See Accepted for Filing PN at 1. See Promoting Efficient Use of Spectrum Through Elimination of Barriers to the Development of Secondary Markets, WT Docket No. 00-230, Report and Order and Further Notice and Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd. 20,604, 20,683 � 197 (2003). See Accepted for Filing PN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1889A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1889A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1889A1.txt
  • 1.221(c). OSC, 20 FCC Rcd at 5771, � 12. Id. FCC 05M-13 (rel. Mar. 17, 2005). See.Judge's Ex. 2. Id. at 1-2. Id. at 4. See Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 05M-16 (rel. Mar. 30, 2005) (``MO&O''). Specifically, the MO&O concluded that the Show Cause Reply and its submission to the Presiding Judge were in violation of sections 0.401, 1.7, 1.47, 1.51(a)(1), 1.52, 1.209, 1.211, 1.291(a)(4), and 1.296 of the Commission's Rules. Id. at 2, � 4. Id. Id. at 2, � 5. Id. at 2, n.2. Id. at 3. See Judge's Ex. 3. Id. at 1. As noted above, the Media Bureau canceled the license for Station K216EQ on May 9, 2005. See Dismissal Order, note 4 supra, at 2,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-520A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-520A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-520A1.txt
  • Indira Rabindranatham, Controller, Atlantic Digital, Inc. (dated July 29, 2004) (July 29, 2004 Letter). Specifically, Atlantic Digital failed to file an affidavit supporting its appeal. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.721(b)(2). In addition, there is no indication that Atlantic Digital served a copy of the request for review upon the Administrator. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.721(c). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.47. Thus, the Division requested that Atlantic Digital file an amended appeal that fully conforms to the Commission's rules by August 12, 2004. See July 29, 2004 Letter at 1. An amended appeal would relate back to the date of the original filing. The Commission has not received an amended appeal from Atlantic Digital. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.709(a)(3). Atlantic Digital
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1546A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1546A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1546A1.txt
  • Commission should withhold making a decision on the Application ``until the LIM informal objection and all other issues of the informal objection are resolved by the FCC.'' Discussion. Procedural Matter. In the Opposition, LIM and NYStar claim that the Objection was not timely because it was served after it had been filed and contained no proof of service. Under Section 1.47(b) of the Rules, ``service shall be made ... on or before the day on which the document is filed.'' The Objection was filed with the Commission on May 12, 2006. LIM was served the Objection via mail on May 20, 2006, and received it on May 22, 2006. Though the Objection should have been served on or before May 12,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1549A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1549A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1549A1.txt
  • is styled as a petition to deny, Alex has failed to provide an affidavit to support any allegations of fact as required by Section 309(d)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (``Act''). Additionally, Alex failed to serve a copy of the pleading on the applicant or its counsel, as required by Section 309(d)(1) of the Act and Section 1.47 of the Commission's Rules. Accordingly, Alex's petition to deny is procedurally defective and must be dismissed. We will, however, treat the petition as an informal objection pursuant to Section 73.3587 of the Commission's Rules. Substantive Matters. In evaluating an application for license renewal, the Commission's decision is governed by Section 309(k) of the Act. That section provides that we are
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1919A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1919A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1919A1.txt
  • than October 5, 2006. Stations requesting a waiver may file a Response to an Opposition no later than October 13, 2006. Such Oppositions and Responses should be filed electronically using the ECFS and reference MB Docket No. 05-317 and the call sign of the station requesting the waiver, and should be served on the affected parties. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.47. . TTY: (202) 418-7172. --FCC-- See 47 U.S.C. � 339(a)(2)(D)(viii) as amended by Section 204 of the SHVERA. See TV Station Requests for Waiver of Digital Testing Pursuant to the Satellite Home Viewer Extension and Reauthorization Act of 2004 to be Filed by November 30, 2005 or February 15, 2007, Public Notice (DA 05-2979, Nov. 17, 2005). Other stations are
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2087A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2087A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2087A1.txt
  • and finding that the public interest, convenience, and necessity would be served thereby, the application for renewal of license for station WJAB(FM), Huntsville, Alabama, (File No. BRED-20031204AJF) IS GRANTED. Sincerely, Peter H. Doyle Chief, Audio Division Media Bureau cc: Alabama A & M University WJAB(FM) filed an opposition on November 11, 2004. 47 U.S.C. � 309(d)(1). Id.; 47 C.F.R. � 1.47. Williams' failure to serve a copy of the pleading did not violate the Commission's ex parte rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200 et seq., because Williams is exempt as a listener pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(8). The opposition states that the applicant received a copy of the pleading from Commission staff after inquiring about the status of its renewal application.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2329A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2329A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2329A1.txt
  • period by 120 days. Comments on and oppositions to petitions listed in the November 7 Public Notice now are due no later than March 27, 2007. We also establish a 40-day period for the filing of replies to these comments and oppositions. Petitioners also seek a limited waiver of the Commission's service rules, requesting that ``the service requirement of Section 1.47(g) be waived for all parties other than Petitioner.'' Section 1.47(g) provides that all comments, oppositions, and replies must be served on the relevant petitioner(s), commenting parties, or opposing parties, and shall include a certification that such service occurred. Petitioners state that they ``do not seek this waiver for their benefit, as they intend to serve all parties in this proceeding
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2429A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2429A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2429A1.txt
  • below, we dismiss the application, as amended, and the STA request as defective without prejudice to refiling. Specifically, Telenor lists 42.3 and 53.8 dBW/4 kHz as the Maximum EIRP densities per Carrier in response to question E49 for the 48M6G7W and 69K0G7W emissions. These levels correspond to a power density at the input of the antenna flange of -10.03 and 1.47 dBW/4 kHz, respectively. These values exceed the maximum input power spectral density limit for routinely authorized earth stations in Section 25.212(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �25.212(c). In such cases, applicants may not use ALSAT-designated satellites as the point of communication. Thus, Telenor must identify specific satellites as its point of communication. Also, in accordance with Section 25.220(f)(2) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-494A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-494A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-494A1.txt
  • in violation of Section 224(f)(1) and (2) of the Act, and Entergy shall have the burden of proving that the denial was lawful, once a prima facie case is established by the Complainants. Bureau Participation The Enforcement Bureau shall be a party to the hearing before the ALJ and will determine its level of participation, as appropriate. Pursuant to section 1.47(c) of the Commission's rules, the Bureau shall be served with documents in the same manner as other parties. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), and 224 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 154(j), and 224, and sections 0.111, 0.311, 1.1411, and 1.1415 of the Commission's rules, 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-494A1_Erratum.doc
  • in violation of Section 224(f)(1) and (2) of the Act, and Entergy shall have the burden of proving that the denial was lawful, once a prima facie case is established by the Complainants. Bureau Participation The Enforcement Bureau shall be a party to the hearing before the ALJ and will determine its level of participation, as appropriate. Pursuant to section 1.47(c) of the Commission's rules, the Bureau shall be served with documents in the same manner as other parties. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), and 224 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 154(j), and 224, and sections 0.111, 0.311, 1.1411, and 1.1415 of the Commission's rules, 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-579A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-579A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-579A1.txt
  • See 47 U.S.C. � 339(a)(D)(viii), as amended by Section 204 of the SHVERA. TV Station Requests for Waiver of Digital Testing Pursuant to the Satellite Home Viewer Extension and Reauthorization Act of 2004 to be Filed by November 30, 2005 or February 15, 2007, Public Notice, DA 05-2979 (released November 17, 2005) (the ``Public Notice''). See generally 47 C.F.R. � 1.47. See also 47 C.F.R. �1.1200, et seq. 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(d). 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(g). Responses should be filed electronically using the ECFS and reference MB Docket No. 05-317 and the call sign of the station that is the subject of the waiver request. See Public Notice. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-649A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-649A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-649A1.txt
  • 16. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, sections 1.4(f) and 1.773(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.4(f), 1.773(b) ARE WAIVED for the purpose specified in paragraph 8 supra. 17. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, section 1.47(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(d), IS WAIVED for the purpose specified in paragraph 13 supra. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tamara L. Preiss Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau The price cap ILECs that must file a short form TRP on May 1, 2006, are ALLTEL Telephone System; Ameritech Operating Companies; BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc.; CenturyTel Operating Companies; Cincinnati
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-651A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-651A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-651A1.txt
  • auction participant is sufficient by itself to bring the issues raised in the PTD and PFR before us. See Opposition to PTD at 2-4; Reply at 1-2. In addition, given our disposition of this matter, we do not reach PSI's other procedural challenge to the PFR, which asserts that service of the PFR on PSI's counsel was defective under Section 1.47 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.47. See Opposition to PFR at 2-3. PTD at 1-2; Reply at 2-5; PFR at 2-5. The Petitioners contend that counsel's omissions must be imputed to the applicant, citing Section 217 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 217. Reply at 2-3; PFR at 3-4. However, the grant of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1309A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1309A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1309A1.txt
  • than April 9, 2007. Stations requesting a waiver may file a Response to an Opposition no later than April 23, 2007. Such Oppositions and Responses should be filed electronically using the ECFS and reference MB Docket No. 05-317 and the call sign of the station requesting the waiver, and should be served on the affected parties. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.47. Nine stations listed on the Attachment which were previously granted waivers filed for second extensions. In order to ensure action before April 30, 2007, any Oppositions to such further extensions should be filed with the Commission and served on the relevant parties by March 30, 2007, and any Responses to such Oppositions must be filed and served no later than
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1483A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1483A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1483A1.txt
  • 15. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, sections 1.4(f) and 1.773(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.4(f), 1.773(b) ARE WAIVED for the purpose specified in paragraph 7 supra. 16. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, section 1.47(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(d), IS WAIVED for the purpose specified in paragraph 12 supra. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Albert M. Lewis Acting Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau The price cap ILECs that must file a short form TRP on May 1, 2007, are The Ameritech Operating Companies; BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc.; CenturyTel Operating Companies; Cincinnati Bell
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1550A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1550A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1550A1.txt
  • Struhar has failed to provide an affidavit to support any of the allegations of fact that he has made, as required by Section 309(d)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the "Act"). Additionally, Struhar failed to serve a copy of his pleadings on the Licensee or its counsel, as required by Section 309(d)(1) of the Act and Section 1.47 of the Rules. Accordingly, we will treat these and the other Objections collectively as an informal objection pursuant to Section 73.3587 of the Rules. Substantive Matters. In evaluating an application for license renewal, the Commission's decision is governed by Section 309(k)(1) of the Act. That section provides that the Commission is to grant a license renewal application if, upon consideration
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1564A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1564A2.txt
  • to That with Bandlimited Gaussian Noise D/U Ratio Relative to Baseline (dB) Channel Offset A3 D3 I1 J1 M1 N1 O1 G4 Mean (dB) (Excluding G4) Standard Deviation (dB) (Excluding G4) N-6 -1.32 -1.25 -1.61 -0.73 -1.85 -0.87 -1.76 -3.72 -1.34 0.43 N-4 -1.31 -1.43 -0.92 -1.07 -1.66 -1.07 -0.87 -1.94 -1.19 0.29 N-3 -0.79 -1.85 -2.23 -1.73 -1.50 -2.38 -1.47 -0.26 -1.71 0.53 N-2 -0.76 -1.94 -2.31 -0.53 -1.31 -0.91 -0.71 -0.89 -1.21 0.68 N+2 0.02 -2.99 -1.94 -0.48 -0.04 -0.67 -0.40 0.50 -0.93 1.12 Mean -0.83 -1.89 -1.80 -0.91 -1.27 -1.18 -1.04 -1.26 -1.28 Std Dev 0.55 0.68 0.56 0.51 0.72 0.69 0.56 1.64 0.68 Note: The overall means and standard deviations (lower right corner of the chart) omitted
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2761A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2761A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2761A1.txt
  • together with a notice of the filing of the complaint. Such notice shall call upon the defendant to satisfy or answer the complaint in writing within the time specified in said notice of complaint. (2) All subsequent pleadings and briefs shall be served by the filing party on all other parties to the proceeding in accordance with the requirements of �1.47 of this chapter. Proof of such service shall also be made in accordance with the requirements of said section. (G) Answers to complaints and amended complaints. Any party upon whom a copy of a complaint or amended complaint is served under this subpart shall serve an answer within the time specified by the Commission in its notice of complaint. The
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-291A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-291A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-291A1.txt
  • AT&T Wireless, 15 FCC Rcd at 4588 � 3 (citing Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc. 438 U.S. 59, 72, 78 (1978)). In addition, given our disposition of this matter, we do not reach PSI's other procedural challenge to the PTD, which asserts that service of the PTD on PSI's counsel was defective under 47 C.F.R. � 1.47. See Opposition at 2-3. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.939(d)(1). Section 309(d)(1) of the Communications Act, as amended, permits any ``party in interest'' to file a petition to deny any application. 47 U.S.C. � 309(d)(1). To establish standing, a petitioner must show ``(1) a distinct and palpable personal injury-in-fact that is (2) traceable to the respondent's conduct and (3) redressable by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3109A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3109A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3109A1.txt
  • to read as described by Section 204(a) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. 56 (1996). See Implementation of Sections204(a) and 204(c) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (Broadcast License Renewal Procedures), Order, 11 FCC Rcd 6363 (1996). 47 U.S.C. �� 309(k)(2), 309(k)(3). 47 C.F.R. � 1.45. Supplement at 1. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(d). Facility ID No. 55461. Facility ID No. 55462. According to Ruby, Stations KCLS(FM) and KELY(AM) provide ``city grade coverage to the community of McGill, Nevada, and compete with Station K237AJ for audience in that community.'' Petition at 1. N.R.S. � 318.1187. N.R.S. � 318.1187 (2)(b). Petition at 2. See Abundant Life, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 16 FCC Rcd 4972,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A4.txt
  • 1.92 GameShow 1,441 0.97Business 1,453 0.98 Health 2,370 1.59Children 920 0.62 Hobbies 10,237 6.88Comedy 4,764 3.20 Infomercial 6,042 4.06Community 1,231 0.83 Instructional 3,811 2.56Documentary 2,235 1.50 Miniseries 352 0.24Drama 13,622 9.16 Movie 11,078 7.45Educational 13,090 8.80 Music 2,999 2.02Entertainment 2,800 1.88 NetworkSeries 20,919 14.07Fantasy 952 0.64 News 1,610 1.08French 159 0.11 Other 8,333 5.60GameShow 501 0.34 Pelicula 941 0.63Health 2,181 1.47 PublicAffairs 3,240 2.18History 170 0.11 Religious 5,704 3.84Hobbies 1,011 0.68 Special 7,308 4.91HomeGarden 12,994 8.74 Sports 11,701 7.87Infomercial 6,042 4.06 Syndicated 31,942 21.48Missing 18,586 12.50 TVMovie 1,456 0.98Movie 158 0.11 TalkShow 3,773 2.54Music 2,960 1.99 News 1,218 0.82 Other 629 0.42 Outdoor 5,877 3.95 PublicAffairs 2,230 1.50 Reality 5,236 3.52 Religious 1,750 1.18 Shopping 1,388 0.93 Sitcom 13,668 9.19 Spanish
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A5.txt
  • variable was not significantly related to public affairs programming. The total number of stations in the market and the share of males in the market population each had a positive and significant effect on the chance a station aired any public affairs programming, just as they did in the public affairs estimations. The magnitudes of the effects were 1.02 and 1.47, respectively. The noncommercial and band dummies were related to local public affairs in much the same way as they were related to public affairs. A noncommercial station was significantly more likely to air local public affairs, by a factor of 3, II - 26 while an FM station was significantly less likely to air public affairs, by a factor of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • -0.0007* (-2.22) 0.1788 276 Average Block, News, Evening 2.8603 (1.67) -0.0276 (1.06) 1.0977*(2.23) -0.0870 (-0.65) 0.0001 (1.06) 0.1372 276 Average Block, Sports, Evening 14.3771*(2.63) -0.0751 (0.91) -0.8603 (-0.55) 0.5272 (1.24) 0.0002 (0.74) 0.1124 276 Number of Syndicated Programs 5.4206 (1.43) 0.0010 (0.02) 0.4993 (0.38) -0.2558 (-0.78) 0.0006* (2.37) 0.1367 561 Number of Personalities -3.0812 (0.57) -0.0097 (0.13) 1.3210 (0.71) 0.6883 (1.47) 0.0001 (0.26) 0.1177 561 Note: Asterisk denotes statistical significance at least at the 5 percent level. Source: Ownership Database (from FCC), Edison Airplay Database Dependent Variable Table 21: Station Level Regressions Estimating the Effect of Ownership Structure on Other Program Content Measures FM Only, In-Market, Edison Surveyed Stations Includes Demographics and Station Characteristics HHI Sisters Television Cross- Ownership Number of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A7.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A7.txt
  • (in seconds) Independent variables (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Local station ownership Cross-owned newspaper 20.5 (1.11) 19.2 (0.81) 14.5 (0.68) 26.3 (1.29) 24.9 (1.30) Cross-owned radio station -126.2** (2.38) -112.8** (2.18) -96.2** (2.35) -79.6** (2.03) Cross-owned radio and newspaper 85.4 (1.32) 102.7* (1.74) 96.7* (1.87) 73.3 (1.48) Parent company coverage of all television households (%) 4.5** (2.60) 4.6*** (2.74) 2.6 (1.47) Network owned and operated -39.0 (0.81) -72.5 (1.50) -34.8 (0.71) Network affiliation (omitted category is CW\MyNetwork) ABC 39.7 (0.93) 19.0 (0.36) CBS -5.9 (0.14) -17.2 (0.33) FOX 119.0** (2.48) 81.8* (1.70) NBC 0.3 (0.01) -11.2 (0.20) Other control variables Time and length of broadcast fixed effects No No No No Yes DMA and date fixed effects Yes Yes Yes Yes
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3475A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3475A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3475A1.txt
  • late-filed petition on either party to the WYTV(TV) assignment application. Under Section 1.45 of the Commission's rules, a petitioner must file its petition to deny in accordance with the procedures of Section 1.939. That section requires that a ``petitioner shall serve a copy of its petition to deny on the applicant and on all other interested parties pursuant to Section 1.47.'' Furthermore, the applicants note that the certificate of service appended to the petition does not even purport to provide service on the parties to the application or their respective counsel. On the merits, the applicants argue that nothing in NABET's petition supports any conclusion that the contemplated arrangements are not in compliance with the Commission's rules and policies. They contend
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-469A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-469A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-469A1.txt
  • Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) providers. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.706. The terms ``telecommunications carrier'' and ``telecommunications'' are defined in section 54.5 of the Commission's rules. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.5. 47 C.F.R. � 54.706. See also 47 C.F.R. � 54.5 (defining ``interconnected VoIP provider''); 47 C.F.R. � 9.3 (defining ``interconnected VoIP service''). 47 C.F.R. � 1.8002(a). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.47, 64.1195. See Universal Service Contribution Methodology, WC Docket Nos. 06-122 & 04-36, CC Docket Nos. 96-45, 98-171, 90-571, 92-237, 99-200, 95-116, & 98-170, & NSD File no. L-00-72, Report and Order and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 21 FCC Rcd 7518, 7548-49, para. 61 (2006) (2006 Contribution Methodology Order); Federal Communications Commission, Instructions to the Telecommunications Reporting Worksheet, Form 499-A, pp.16-17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2614A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2614A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2614A1.txt
  • Intelligent Transportation & Monitoring Wireless LLC, AMTS Consortium LLC, Telesaurus VPC LLC, Further Comments (Based on the Recently Released Redacted Attachment A) (filed Aug. 25, 2008) (``Havens Further Comments''). , and 47 C.F.R. � 1.4(f). However, the Havens Further Comments were received by the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) after the August 22, 2008 deadline. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.47. Progeny LMS, LLC, Response of Progeny LMS, LLC and Opposition to Request for Additional Time (filed Aug. 26, 2008). In its response to Havens' Further Comments, Progeny maintains that the attachment is consistent with its extension request, which is based upon the unavailability of M-LMS equipment under the existing rules rather than under any proposed rules. Id. at 5, 6.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-448A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-448A2.txt
  • 12/5/05 1305 3.00 Figure 1 Sheet 7 of 7 Valcom AM Broadcast Antenna (85 foot with Valcosphere) Operating Frequency: 1200 kHz 315 Degree Radial Point Distance Time Field Strength Desig. (km) Date (local) (mV/m) 1 0.25 11/23/05 1625 410 2 0.50 11/23/05 1615 189 3 0.75 11/23/05 1609 120 4 1.01 11/23/05 1558 93.0 5 1.23 11/23/05 1353 80.0 6 1.47 11/23/05 1359 69.0 7 1.75 11/23/05 1405 49.0 8 2.00 11/23/05 1412 37.5 9 2.48 11/23/05 1430 33.0 10 3.00 11/23/05 1435 22.2 11 3.90 11/23/05 1441 16.6 12 5.03 11/23/05 1449 6.60 13 6.00 11/23/05 1455 4.50 14 7.00 11/23/05 1504 4.60 15 8.00 11/23/05 1509 3.50 16 9.40 11/23/05 1515 3.00 17 11.60 11/23/05 1522 3.50 18 14.80
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-758A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-758A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-758A1.txt
  • and 1.773(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.4(f), 1.773(b) ARE WAIVED for the purpose specified in paragraph 7 supra. 16. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91 and 0.291, section 1.47(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(d), IS WAIVED for the purpose specified in paragraph 12, note 10 supra. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Albert M. Lewis Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 61.38. The price cap ILECs that must file a short form TRP on May 1, 2008, are: the Ameritech Operating Companies; BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc.;
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-831A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-831A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-831A1.txt
  • time. Id. Id. at 1. Id. CCI Opposition; East Kentucky Network, LLC Opposition to Petition to Deny (filed June 12, 2007) (``East Kentucky Opposition''). CCI and East Kentucky assert that section 1.939 of the Commission's rules requires a petitioner ``to serve a copy of its petition to deny upon the applicant and on all other interested parties'' and that section 1.47 of the Commission's rules requires service to be provided ``on or before the day on which the document is filed.'' CCI Opposition at 1-2; see East Kentucky Opposition at 2. CCI and East Kentucky assert that neither the parties nor their counsel were properly served with the Petition. CCI Opposition at 2, East Kentucky Opposition at 2. East Kentucky Opposition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1003A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1003A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1003A1.txt
  • Shekira Iglesia filed an Opposition to the Objection on January 9, 2009, to which Trinity replied on January 27, 2009. 47 C.F.R. �� 73.3527 and 73.3580. The Opposition also contains a request, to the extent that one is necessary, for waiver of Section 73.3580 of the Rules. File No. BNPED-20071018AHP (granted April 22, 2008). Reply at 2. 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(g) lists the requirements for valid proof of service. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1202(b), 1.1208. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.47. See John F. Garziglia, Esq., and Donald E. Martin, Esq., Letter, 22 FCC Rcd 8409, 8414 (MB 2007) (admonishing NCE licensee, not represented by FCC counsel, for apparent violation of the ex parte Rules due to ignorance of the Rules). 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2033A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2033A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2033A1.txt
  • Discussion. Procedural Issues. Miller's pleading is procedurally defective. Miller fails to provide an affidavit to support the allegations raised within her pleading, as required by Section 309(d)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''). Additionally, Miller's failure to properly serve the pleading on either the licensee or its counsel violates Section 309(d)(1) of the Act, and Section 1.47 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''). Accordingly, we will dismiss Miller's pleading as a petition to deny. We will, however, treat the pleading as an informal objection pursuant to Section 73.3587 of the Rules. Substantive Issues. As noted, Simpson is President and majority shareholder of Farm and Home. Miller has failed to provide documentation demonstrating that Simpson lacks authority to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-683A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-683A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-683A1.txt
  • and 1.773(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.4(f), 1.773(b) ARE WAIVED for the purpose specified in paragraph 7 supra. 16. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91 and 0.291, section 1.47(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(d), IS WAIVED for the purpose specified in paragraph 12, note 11 supra. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Albert M. Lewis Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 61.39. The price cap ILECs that must file a short form TRP on May 1, 2009, are the Ameritech Operating Companies; BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc.;
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-888A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-888A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-888A1.txt
  • and ``the address contained in the licensee's most recent application will be used by the Commission for this purpose.'' 47 C.F.R. � 1.5(a). Ms. Kurian did not state her mailing address on her reply, as required by Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.52. Nor does it appear that she properly served MRA, as required by Section 1.47 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.47. Therefore, we conclude that it was reasonable for MRA to send its motion to strike to Ms. Kurian's Dunster Castle Drive address. Moreover, we note that consideration of the information set forth in the reply would not have changed the outcome. Ms. Kurian submitted a copy of an unexecuted agreement for MRA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-888A1_Rcd.pdf
  • from previous page) contained in the licensee's most recent application will be used by the Commission for this purpose." 47 C.F.R. � 1.5(a). Ms. Kurian did not state her mailing address on her reply, as required by Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.52. Nor does it appear that she properly served MRA, as required by Section 1.47 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.47. Therefore, we conclude that it was reasonable for MRA to send its motion to strike to Ms. Kurian's Dunster Castle Drive address. 33Moreover, we note that consideration of the information set forth in the reply would not have changed the outcome. Ms. Kurian submitted a copy of an unexecuted agreement for MRA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-893A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-893A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-893A1.txt
  • Public Notice, DA 05-689 (WTB rel. Apr. 6, 2005) (``If the FCC does not receive either a notification of consummation or a request for an extension of time to consummate on or before the consummation deadline, the application will be dismissed and a dismissal letter will be sent to the parties involved with the application.''). See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. �� 1.47, 1.106(f)-(h), 1.115(f), 1.939(c), 1.1204(a)(10)(ii). ACL suggests that it filed its notice of consummation before the Division processed the withdrawal request, because ``ACL did not see any grant of the Withdrawal Request when filing the Notice of Consummation on ULS.'' First Petition at 2 n.1; Second Petition at 4 n.5. We note, however, that processing actions taken during the business day
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-893A1_Rcd.pdf
  • Assignment and Transfer of Control Applications, Public Notice, DA 05-689 (WTB rel. Apr. 6, 2005) ("If the FCC does not receive either a notificationof consummationor a request for an extension of time to consummate on or before theconsummation deadline, the application will be dismissedand a dismissalletter will be sent to the parties involved with the application."). 19See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. ��1.47, 1.106(f)-(h), 1.115(f), 1.939(c), 1.1204(a)(10)(ii). 20ACL suggests that it filedits notice of consummation before the Division processed the withdrawal request, because "ACL did not see any grant of the Withdrawal Request when filing the Notice of Consummation on ULS." First Petition at 2 n.1; Second Petition at 4 n.5. We note, however, that processing actions taken during the business (continued....) 4851
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1037A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1037A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1037A1.txt
  • are without merit. Discussion. Procedural Issue. Hensley's November Objection is procedurally defective as a petition to deny. Hensley failed to provide an affidavit to support his factual allegations, as required by Section 309(d)(1) of the Act. Additionally, Hensley failed to properly serve this pleading on the Respondents or their counsel, as required by Section 309(d)(1) of the Act and Section 1.47 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''). Hensley attempted to correct these defects in his December Objection, but that pleading was not filed within the 30-day period for filing petitions to deny established by the Public Notice announcing the acceptance of the Application. Accordingly, we will dismiss Hensley's pleadings as petitions to deny. We will, however, treat the pleadings as informal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-460A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-460A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-460A1.txt
  • year surveyed. The showings are for two four-week survey periods in each of two years for WJBK. For the first year, the submitted data show that for the May 2006/November 2006 audience sweep periods, combined, with the standard errors added, WJBK attains a 0.076 percent share of total weekly viewing hours (0.038 reported share + 0.038 standard error) and a 1.47 percent average net weekly circulation share (0.73 reported share + 0.74 standard error). For the second year, the submitted data for the May 2007/November 2007 audience sweep periods, combined, WJBK attains no measurable audience shares. FOX affiliates are considered independent stations for the purposes of determining whether a station is significantly viewed. Independent stations, therefore, must attain a 2 percent
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-505A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-505A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-505A1.txt
  • and 1.773(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.4(f), 1.773(b) ARE WAIVED for the purpose specified in paragraph 7 supra. 16. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91 and 0.291, section 1.47(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(d), IS WAIVED for the purpose specified in paragraph 12, note 11 supra. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Albert M. Lewis Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 61.38. The price cap ILECs that must file a short form TRP on May 17, 2010, are the ACS Companies; the Ameritech Operating Companies;
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-576A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-576A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-576A1.txt
  • FCC Rcd 12682, 12684 (2004) (dismissing opposition late-filed by 30 days). See National Ready Mixed Concrete Co., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 5250, 5251 n.12 (2008). See also Charles T. Crawford, et al. Memorandum Opinion and Order, 17 FCC Rcd 19328, 19329 (2002) (Commission not obligated to consider informal requests). Smartcomm Motion at 2. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.47 (Service of Documents and Proof of Service). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 10-576 Federal Communications Commission DA 10-576 � � � � j l � l � 0 l � 0 . / 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 : ; < = > ? @ A B C D E F
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1454A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1454A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1454A1.txt
  • Number of Broadcast Stations Licensed to State Household-weighted Number of Stations Carried by DBS DMA DMA Rank State Segment No. of HHs in State Segment % DMA HHs in State Segment Measured by Nielsen Full-Power Stations Only All Full- and Low-Power Stations DISH Network DIRECTV SIOUX CITY 149 IA 110,500 70.70% 9 5.01 5.86 5 7 NE 39,800 25.46% 6 1.47 2.88 1 1 SD 6,000 3.84% 3 4.81 4.81 0 0 SIOUX FALLS(MITCHELL) 112 IA 6,800 2.56% 2 5.01 6.51 0 0 MN 21,300 8.01% 2 1.46 1.72 1 1 NE 2,300 0.86% 1 1.64 1.65 0 6 SD 235,500 88.57% 25 5.68 7.32 6 0 SOUTH BEND-ELKHART 93 IN 255,500 75.30% 10 8.67 13.76 8 6 MI 83,800 24.70%
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1658A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1658A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1658A1.txt
  • U.S.C. 151, 154(i), 154(j), 155, 157, 225, 227, 303(r), and 309. Amend � 1.4 by revising paragraph (h) to read as follows: � 1.4 Computation of time. * * * * * (h) If a document is required to be served upon other parties by statute or Commission regulation and the document is in fact served by mail (see � 1.47(f)), and the filing period for a response is 10 days or less, an additional 3 days (excluding holidays) will be allowed to all parties in the proceeding for filing a response. This paragraph (h) shall not apply to documents filed pursuant to � 1.89, � 1.315(b) or � 1.316. For purposes of this paragraph (h) service by facsimile or by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-400A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-400A3.txt
  • 54.711, 64.604(b)(5)(iii)(B). 3 See 47 U.S.C. � 159(a), (b)(1)(A), (g) (authorizing the Commission to collect annual regulatory fees to recover the costs of enforcement, policy and rulemaking, user information, and international activities). 4 See 47 C.F.R. �� 52.17 (numbering administration), 52.32 (local number portability), 54.706 (universal service), 64.604 (interstate TRS). 5 47 U.S.C. � 413; see also 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h). 6 47 C.F.R. � 64.1195. 7 For this purpose, the United States is defined as the contiguous United States, Alaska, Hawaii, American Samoa, Baker Island, Guam, Howland Island, Jarvis Island, Johnston Atoll, Kingman Reef, Midway Island, Navassa Island, the Northern Mariana Islands, Palmyra, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and Wake Island. 8 Section 254(d) applies not only to "every
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-558A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-558A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-558A1.txt
  • goes on notice pursuant to paragraph (c)(4) of this section. The Wireless Telecommunications Bureau shall establish by Public Notice the process for filing Requests for environmental processing and responsive pleadings consistent with the following provisions. (A) Service and pleading cycle. The interested person or entity shall serve a copy of its Request on the prospective ASR applicant pursuant to � 1.47 of this chapter. Oppositions may be filed no later than 10 days after the time for filing Requests has expired. Replies to oppositions may be filed no later than 5 days after the time for filing oppositions has expired. Oppositions shall be served upon the Requester, and replies shall be served upon the prospective applicant. (B) Content. An Environmental Request
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-558A1_Rcd.pdf
  • goes on notice pursuant to paragraph (c)(4) of this section. The Wireless Telecommunications Bureau shall establish by Public Notice the process for filing Requests for environmental processing and responsive pleadings consistent with the following provisions. (A) Service and pleading cycle. The interested person or entity shall serve a copy of its Request on the prospective ASR applicant pursuant to � 1.47 of this chapter. Oppositions may be filed no later than 10 days after the time for filing Requests has expired. Replies to oppositions may be filed no later than 5 days after the time for filing oppositions has expired. Oppositions shall be served upon the Requester, and replies shall be served upon the prospective applicant. (B) Content. An Environmental Request
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-569A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-569A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-569A1.txt
  • 1.4(f) and 1.773(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.4(f), 1.773(b), ARE WAIVED for the purpose specified in paragraph 7 supra. 16. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, section 1.47(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(d), IS WAIVED for the purpose specified in paragraph 12, note 17 supra. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Albert M. Lewis Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 61.39. The price cap ILECs that must file a short form TRP on May 17, 2011, are the ACS Companies; the Ameritech Operating Companies;
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.txt
  • in that particular regression specification in table 13 is being driven by listener behavior in markets that are outside of the full-service commercial FM stations home territory. Table 15 Effect of LPFM Entry on the Ratings of Full-Service Commercial FM Stations in Home Radio Markets Independent Variable Contour Measure Market Measure Contour/Market Measure Number of LPFM stations 0.000 (0.03) 0.007 (1.47) 0.004 (0.74) Number of AM stations in market -0.004 (0.97) -0.003 (0.85) -0.004 (0.90) Number of AM stations in contour -0.001 (0.12) -0.001 (0.09) -0.001 (0.13) Number of FM stations in market 0.001 (0.35) 0.001 (0.30) 0.001 (0.39) Number of FM stations in contour -0.007 (1.63) -0.007 (1.68) -0.007 (1.69) Number of commercial TV stations -0.003 (0.29) -0.005 (0.48) -0.004
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-482A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-482A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-482A1.txt
  • and 1.773(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.4(f), 1.773(b), ARE WAIVED for the limited purpose specified in paragraph 8 supra. 18. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.3, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.91, 0.291, section 1.47(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(d), IS WAIVED for the limited purpose specified in paragraph 13, note 28 supra. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Victoria S. Goldberg Acting Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 61.38 (rate-of-return carriers that file tariffs based on projected costs and demand). 47 C.F.R. �� 51.915(e) and 61.39 (rate-of-return carriers that file
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-96-1482A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-96-1482A1.txt
  • EchoStar Reply at 7. 22 EchoStar Reply at 8-9. 23 Both DBSC and EchoStar maintain that they were not served in compliance with the Commission's rules for service of an opposition pleading, and that CPT impermissibly combined separate petitions (for denial of the application and for rulemaking) in a single pleading. 47 U.S.C. � 309 (d); 47 C.F.R. � � 1.47 and 1.44(d). 24 We also note that issues concerning the potential anticompetitive effects of consolidation among DBS permittees were extensively discussed by actual and potential competitors in that proceeding. Notwithstanding their demonstrated interest in anti-competitive concerns, neither existing nor prospective DBS permittees have opposed the present transaction between DBSC and EchoStar. 10497 11. CPT's principal objection in this case arises
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-99-274A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-99-274A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-99-274A1.txt
  • Public Notice SPB-144 (rel. December 15, 1998) (EchoStar/MCI PN). "For purposes of this paragraph service by facsimile or by electronic means shall be deemed equivalent to hand delivery." 47 C.F.R. � 1.4(h) (1998). "If a document is required to be served upon other parties by statute or Commission regulation and the document is in fact served by mail (see � 1.47(f)), and the filing period for a response is 10 days or less, an additional 3 days (excluding holidays) will be allowed to all parties in the proceeding for filing a response." Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). Federal Communications Commission DA 99-274 Federal Communications Commission DA 99-274 � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206118A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206118A1.pdf
  • (FCC Form 499), which is used to calculate carriers' contributions to fund four different programs: interstate telecommunications relay service (TRS), federal universal service support mechanisms, the cost-recovery mechanism for the North American Numbering Plan Administration, and the cost recovery mechanism for the shared costs of long-term local number portability. In addition, to assist carriers in meeting the requirement of section 1.47 of our rules that all common carriers must designate an agent for service of process in the District of Columbia, we have allowed carriers to report such information on the Form 499. Our rules now provide that carriers may file the relevant portion of the Form 499 with the Commission to satisfy this requirement, and must update the information about
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • Originating Access CCL CCL Local Minute OriginatingTerminatingSwitching BellSouth 0.00� 0.00� 0.36� 0.18� 1.10� 27,845 57,012 83,187 Cincinnati Bell 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.21 1.49 1,042 2,162 3,215 Citizens 0.57 0.00 0.87 0.65 3.69 2,747 2,865 5,680 Global Crossing 0.05 0.00 0.61 0.41 2.15 575 1,583 2,160 Iowa Telecom 0.81 0.00 0.84 0.15 2.90 134 185 331 Qwest 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.18 1.47 21,018 39,686 61,107 SBC 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.21 1.30 64,610 92,623 158,985 Sprint 0.03 0.00 0.63 0.17 1.68 10,375 15,681 26,235 Verizon 0.20 0.00 0.44 0.21 1.54 58,300 131,143 190,087 Price Caps 0.07 0.00 0.45 0.21 1.42 186,646 342,940 530,987 NECA 1.00 1.40 1.59 1.43 8.62 16,085 17,824 17,354 All Price Caps and NECA 0.15� 0.07� 0.48� 0.24� 1.71� 202,731
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-241968A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-241968A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-241968A1.txt
  • concentrated gender groups. Examining our vector of content characteristics, we find that sitcoms and programs with characters aged 18-34 receive premia from advertisers, while news programs, Table 3 Determinants of Expected Advertising Price: The Full Model Regression Coefficients and Goodness of Fit Statistics (t-statistics in parentheses) Variable Estimated Coefficient t Statistic Log (Expected Share) 1.39*** (9.38) Log (Total Viewers) 0.05 (1.47) Percentage Upper-Income 0.01** (2.55) Percentage 18-34 -0.00 (0.02) Gender Concentration 0.01* (1.88) Sitcom 0.20** (2.52) News -0.26*** (3.81) Police -0.26*** (3.10) Genx 0.16** (2.06) Ethnic 0.08 (0.46) Teens or Children -0.12* (1.76) Sports 0.09 (1.01) Late 0.13* (1.97) Constant 7.01*** (22.27) Observations 71 Adjusted R-Squared .83 F-Statistic 27.74*** *** - significant at 99% confidence level, ** - significant at 95%
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.txt
  • to Revenues of from Billed to Revenues from Revenues Minutes Revenues Foreign Minutes Foreign RevenuesForeign Foreign for all U.S. 4/ Carriers Carriers 6/ Carriers Carriers and Foreign Minutes 1964 20.2 $62.9 $30.3 $32.6 12.0 $19.6 $3.11 $1.50 $1.62 $1.63 $1.62 1965 25.5 78.2 37.2 41.1 15.4 24.7 3.07 1.46 1.61 1.60 1.61 1966 32.3 100.1 47.6 52.5 18.9 30.1 3.10 1.47 1.63 1.59 1.61 1967 39.7 114.2 54.6 59.6 23.4 31.8 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46.4 126.9 61.5 65.4 28.2 40.0 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 64.6 172.0 82.7 89.4 38.3 51.6 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81.1 196.6 98.9 97.7 51.0 59.8 2.43 1.22 1.21 1.17 1.19 1971 100.9 237.4 120.7 116.6 68.4 75.1 2.35 1.20
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.txt
  • Billed to Revenues of from Billed to Revenues from Revenues Minutes RevenuesForeign Minutes Foreign RevenuesForeign Foreign for all U.S. 4/ Carriers Carriers 6/ Carriers Carriers and Foreign Minutes 1964 20.2 $62.9 $30.3 $32.6 12.0 $19.6 $3.11 $1.50 $1.62 $1.63 $1.62 1965 25.5 78.2 37.2 41.1 15.4 24.7 3.07 1.46 1.61 1.60 1.61 1966 32.3 100.1 47.6 52.5 18.9 30.1 3.10 1.47 1.63 1.59 1.61 1967 39.7 114.2 54.6 59.6 23.4 31.8 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46.4 126.9 61.5 65.4 28.2 40.0 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 64.6 172.0 82.7 89.4 38.3 51.6 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81.1 196.6 98.9 97.7 51.0 59.8 2.43 1.22 1.21 1.17 1.19 1971 100.9 237.4 120.7 116.6 68.4 75.1 2.35 1.20
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • 0.92 -2.47 250301 A FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF LAMAR COUNTY, LLC 14.22 0.92 13.18 105.58 250302 C ALLTEL ALABAMA 2.07 -0.05 2.12 -5.51 250304 C MILLRY TEL. CO., INC. 0.87 -0.64 1.52 -6.05 250305 C MON-CRE TEL. COOP. INC. 1.26 0.88 0.37 -1.18 250306 C FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF ALABAMA, LLC 36.59 -1.91 39.24 2,668.71 250307 C MOUNDVILLE TEL. CO. 0.21 -1.24 1.47 -2.55 250308 C NEW HOPE TEL. COOP., INC.-AL 8.19 -6.67 15.93 23.70 250311 A OAKMAN TEL. CO., INC. 20.14 5.88 13.47 66.56 250312 A OTELCO TELEPHONE LLC 4.10 -0.60 4.73 0.00 250314 C PEOPLES TEL. CO. 1.64 -3.59 5.43 3.86 250315 C PINE BELT TEL. CO. 0.87 -3.27 4.28 0.87 250316 C RAGLAND TEL. CO. -1.75 7.50 -8.60 -8.19 250317
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A13.txt
  • - Illinois IL 6,310 4,679 79,788 12.64 SBC - Ameritech - Illinois Bell IL (566,083) (578,029) 210,540 (0.37) Verizon - North - Contel/Indiana IN 2,504 1,863 8,349 3.33 Verizon - North - Indiana IN 10,766 7,727 65,383 6.07 SBC - Ameritech - Indiana Bell IN (670,446) (677,913) 67,230 (0.10) Sprint - United Tel Company of Indiana IN 4,551 3,614 6,680 1.47 Iowa Telecom - Iowa IA 8,364 6,457 924 0.11 Iowa Telecom - Iowa North IA 12,211 9,307 1,403 0.11 Iowa Telecom - Iowa System IA 6,784 5,165 856 0.13 Qwest - Iowa IA (26,796) (31,123) 7,439 (0.28) SBC - Southwestern Bell - Kansas KS 32,933 30,195 (3,394) (0.10) ALLTEL Kentucky, Inc. - London KY 4,080 3,137 1,282 0.31 ALLTEL Kentucky,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • 0.92 -2.47 250301 A FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF LAMAR COUNTY, LLC 14.22 0.92 13.18 105.58 250302 C ALLTEL ALABAMA 2.07 -0.05 2.12 -5.51 250304 C MILLRY TEL. CO., INC. 0.87 -0.64 1.52 -6.05 250305 C MON-CRE TEL. COOP. INC. 1.26 0.88 0.37 -1.18 250306 C FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF ALABAMA, LLC 36.59 -1.91 39.24 2,668.71 250307 C MOUNDVILLE TEL. CO. 0.21 -1.24 1.47 -2.55 250308 C NEW HOPE TEL. COOP., INC.-AL 8.19 -6.67 15.93 23.70 250311 A OAKMAN TEL. CO., INC. 20.14 5.88 13.47 66.56 250312 A OTELCO TELEPHONE LLC 4.10 -0.60 4.73 0.00 250314 C PEOPLES TEL. CO. 1.64 -3.59 5.43 3.86 250315 C PINE BELT TEL. CO. 0.87 -3.27 4.28 0.87 250316 C RAGLAND TEL. CO. -1.75 7.50 -8.60 -8.19 250317
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 955 2,154 4,440 7,369 11,809 4.05 Indiana 1,487 2,761 4,248 556 494 1,050 2,043 3,254 5,298 1.82 Iowa 733 1,268 2,001 300 257 558 1,033 1,525 2,559 0.88 Kansas 711 1,238 1,949 304 183 487 1,015 1,421 2,436 0.84 Kentucky 977 1,930 2,907 397 330 727 1,374 2,260 3,634 1.25 Louisiana 1,101 2,398 3,499 423 356 779 1,524 2,754 4,278 1.47 Maine 364 718 1,081 165 106 271 529 824 1,353 0.46 Maryland 1,785 3,178 4,963 712 488 1,200 2,497 3,666 6,163 2.11 Massachusetts 1,909 3,724 5,633 778 487 1,265 2,687 4,211 6,897 2.36 Michigan 2,276 4,926 7,203 834 861 1,695 3,110 5,787 8,897 3.05 Minnesota 1,294 2,368 3,662 542 374 916 1,836 2,742 4,578 1.57 Mississippi 709 1,542 2,251 292
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A3.txt
  • 955 2,154 4,440 7,369 11,809 4.05 Indiana 1,487 2,761 4,248 556 494 1,050 2,043 3,254 5,298 1.82 Iowa 733 1,268 2,001 300 257 558 1,033 1,525 2,559 0.88 Kansas 711 1,238 1,949 304 183 487 1,015 1,421 2,436 0.84 Kentucky 977 1,930 2,907 397 330 727 1,374 2,260 3,634 1.25 Louisiana 1,101 2,398 3,499 423 356 779 1,524 2,754 4,278 1.47 Maine 364 718 1,081 165 106 271 529 824 1,353 0.46 Maryland 1,785 3,178 4,963 712 488 1,200 2,497 3,666 6,163 2.11 Massachusetts 1,909 3,724 5,633 778 487 1,265 2,687 4,211 6,897 2.36 Michigan 2,276 4,926 7,203 834 861 1,695 3,110 5,787 8,897 3.05 Minnesota 1,294 2,368 3,662 542 374 916 1,836 2,742 4,578 1.57 Mississippi 709 1,542 2,251 292
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.txt
  • 7.09 13.50 10.27 Minnesota 6.65 8.25 7.15 0.00 3.50 1.54 0.00 1.75 0.77 6.65 10.00 7.92 6.65 13.50 9.46 Mississippi 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 3.35 0.00 1.75 1.67 8.25 10.00 9.92 8.25 13.50 13.27 Missouri 6.50 8.25 8.04 0.00 1.16 0.77 0.00 0.58 0.39 6.50 8.83 8.43 6.50 9.99 9.20 Montana 8.23 8.25 8.24 0.00 3.50 2.93 0.00 1.75 1.47 8.23 10.00 9.70 8.23 13.50 12.64 Nebraska 6.17 8.25 7.05 0.00 3.50 3.44 0.00 1.75 1.72 6.17 10.00 8.77 6.17 13.50 12.21 Nevada 5.55 8.25 6.15 0.00 3.50 2.95 0.00 1.75 1.47 5.55 10.00 7.63 5.55 13.50 10.57 New Hampshire 8.13 8.25 8.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.13 8.25 8.14 8.13 8.25 8.14 New Jersey 7.02 8.25 8.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • 452169 C SAN CARLOS APACHE TELECOMM. UTILITY, INC. 0.75 1.03 -0.27 -1.64 452171 C ARIZONA TEL. CO. -2.30 -7.04 5.11 -0.26 452172 C CITIZENS UTIL RURAL CO INC DBA FRONTIER 7.12 -0.94 8.14 47.38 452173 C TOHONO O'ODHAM UTILITY AUTHORITY 28.54 -1.09 29.96 55.79 452174 C SOUTHWESTERN TEL. CO. -6.27 -8.06 1.95 -13.85 452175 C CENTURYTEL OF SOUTHWEST, INC.-AZ 4.58 1.47 3.07 1.79 452176 C VALLEY TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC-AZ 8.75 -0.77 9.59 11.12 452179 C GILA RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 2.49 -7.60 10.92 6.53 452191 C ACCIPITER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 20.95 4.19 16.09 21.89 452200 C FORT MOJAVE TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 13.04 10.35 2.44 11.02 452226 C MIDVALE TELEPHONE EXCHANGE, INC.-ARIZONA 37.62 21.19 13.56 43.10 452302 C VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC. - AZ 41.25 -1.49
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • 1987 113.6 0.25 0.41 0.99 0.22 1948 24.1 0.19 1.46 1988 118.3 0.23 0.37 1.02 0.21 1949 23.8 0.19 1.50 1989 124.0 0.22 0.33 1.02 0.19 1950 24.1 0.19 1.51 1990 130.7 0.20 0.29 1.00 0.17 1951 26.0 0.20 1.46 1991 136.2 0.20 0.27 1.02 0.15 1952 26.5 0.20 1.44 1992 140.3 0.19 0.26 1.01 0.15 $0.09 1953 26.7 0.21 1.47 1993 144.5 0.19 0.25 1.02 0.15 0.09 1954 26.9 0.22 1.56 1994 148.2 0.18 0.23 0.93 0.14 0.08 1955 26.8 0.23 1.62 1995 152.4 0.17 0.21 0.91 0.12 0.07 1956 27.2 0.23 1.62 1996 156.9 0.16 0.20 0.76 0.12 0.08 1957 28.1 0.24 1.60 1997 160.5 0.15 0.17 0.69 0.11 0.06 1958 28.9 0.24 1.56 1998 163.0 0.14 0.17 0.58
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272807A1.pdf
  • Commission 445 Twelfth Street SW Washington, D.C. 20554 Recorded listing of releases and texts202 / 418-2222 202 / 418-0500 News media information REPORT NO.26478 CALL LETTERSAPPLICANT AND LOCATION N A T U R E O F A P P L I C A T I O N STATEFILE NUMBER E/P CP FOR A NEW EDUCATIONAL STN ON FREQ: 98.5MHZ; ERP: 1.47KW (H&V); HAAT: 200 METERS(H&V) 42-13-23 121-49-03 PETITION TO DENY FILED 8/16/2000 OPPOSITION TO PETITION TO DENY FILED 10/25/2000 REQUEST TO REMOVE APPLICATION FROM 11/30/01 SETTLEMENT WINDOW FOR MX APPLICATIONS FILED 11/20/01 BY "KLAMATH BASIN". Settlement filed 12/7/01 proposing grant of 950206MH on Channel 253A and grant of 950206MB on Channel 265A. Grant contingent on outcome of rulemaking MM Dkt No.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272810A2.pdf
  • Twelfth Street SW Washington, D.C. 20554 Recorded listing of releases and texts202 / 418-2222 202 / 418-0500 News media information REPORT NO.46478 APPLICANT AND LOCATION CALL LETTERS N A T U R E O F A P P L I C A T I O N FILE NUMBER STATE E/P CP FOR A NEW EDUCATIONAL STN ON FREQ: 98.5MHZ; ERP: 1.47KW (H&V); HAAT: 200 METERS(H&V) 42-13-23 121-49-03 PETITION TO DENY FILED 8/16/2000 OPPOSITION TO PETITION TO DENY FILED 10/25/2000 REQUEST TO REMOVE APPLICATION FROM 11/30/01 SETTLEMENT WINDOW FOR MX APPLICATIONS FILED 11/20/01 BY "KLAMATH BASIN". Settlement filed 12/7/01 proposing grant of 950206MH on Channel 253A and grant of 950206MB on Channel 265A. Grant contingent on outcome of rulemaking MM Dkt No.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275668A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275668A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275668A1.txt
  • the time of the tests. . Test Configurations at Each Site Site 0: No Wall Site 1: Exterior House Wall Site 2: Inter-Unit Townhouse Wall Transmit Antenna: -- Location Outdoors Garage Townhouse A, ground floor -- Mount Wood/fiberglass mast Wood/fiberglass mast Wood tripod -- Floor Asphalt driveway Concrete slab Carpeted concrete slab -- Height (center of antenna) 0.97 m and 1.47 m 0.97 m and 1.47 m for 2-m distance 0.97 m and 2.39 m for 10-m distance 0.88 m and 1.26 m at 2-m distance 0.88 m and 1.45 m at 10-m distance TV: -- Location Outdoors Outdoors Townhouse B, ground floor -- Mount 0.85-m tall plastic cart 0.85-m tall plastic cart 0.85-m tall plastic cart -- Floor Asphalt driveway
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 10.10 13.50 10.36 Minnesota 6.63 8.25 7.11 0.00 3.50 1.86 0.00 1.75 0.93 6.63 10.00 8.04 6.63 13.50 9.90 Mississippi 6.50 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 3.29 0.00 1.75 1.64 6.50 10.00 9.89 6.50 13.50 13.18 Missouri 6.50 8.25 7.41 0.00 3.50 3.50 0.00 1.75 1.75 6.50 10.00 9.16 6.50 13.50 12.65 Montana 8.24 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 2.94 0.00 1.75 1.47 8.24 10.00 9.71 8.24 13.50 12.65 Nebraska 6.10 8.25 7.07 0.00 3.50 3.43 0.00 1.75 1.72 6.10 10.00 8.79 6.10 13.50 12.22 Nevada 5.54 8.25 6.17 0.00 3.50 1.95 0.00 1.75 0.97 5.54 10.00 7.14 5.54 13.50 9.09 New Hampshire 8.15 8.25 8.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.15 8.25 8.16 8.15 8.25 8.16 New Jersey 7.08 8.25 8.02
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.txt
  • 10.10 13.50 10.36 Minnesota 6.63 8.25 7.11 0.00 3.50 1.86 0.00 1.75 0.93 6.63 10.00 8.04 6.63 13.50 9.90 Mississippi 6.50 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 3.29 0.00 1.75 1.64 6.50 10.00 9.89 6.50 13.50 13.18 Missouri 6.50 8.25 7.41 0.00 3.50 3.50 0.00 1.75 1.75 6.50 10.00 9.16 6.50 13.50 12.65 Montana 8.24 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 2.94 0.00 1.75 1.47 8.24 10.00 9.71 8.24 13.50 12.65 Nebraska 6.10 8.25 7.07 0.00 3.50 3.43 0.00 1.75 1.72 6.10 10.00 8.79 6.10 13.50 12.22 Nevada 5.54 8.25 6.17 0.00 3.50 1.95 0.00 1.75 0.97 5.54 10.00 7.14 5.54 13.50 9.09 New Hampshire 8.15 8.25 8.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.15 8.25 8.16 8.15 8.25 8.16 New Jersey 7.08 8.25 8.02
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • -4.05 7.50 0.00 150076 A CASSADAGA TEL. CORP. 1.81 -1.67 3.54 2.87 150077 C CHAMPLAIN TEL. CO. 6.75 -2.06 9.00 147.52 150078 C CHAUTAUQUA & ERIE TEL. CORP. 1.10 -3.60 4.88 0.00 150079 C CHAZY & WESTPORT TEL. CORP. -3.58 -1.90 -1.71 -44.94 150081 C CITIZENS TEL. CO. OF HAMMOND, NY -9.39 -1.23 -8.26 -16.66 150084 C TACONIC TEL. CORP. 1.47 -0.15 1.63 0.00 150085 C CROWN POINT TEL. CORP. 0.80 -1.11 1.93 -0.33 150088 A DELHI TELEPHONE COMPANY -3.41 -3.84 0.45 0.00 150089 C DEPOSIT TELEPHONE CO. INC. 2.25 -2.66 5.05 0.00 150091 C DUNKIRK AND FREDONIA TEL. CO. -3.13 -2.81 -0.33 0.00 150092 C EDWARDS TELEPHONE CO. INC. -0.43 0.00 -0.43 -8.30 150093 C EMPIRE TELEPHONE CORP-NY -3.51 1.60
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • 1,147 90 Iowa 499 0.89 443 1 527 41 Kansas 484 0.87 430 1 511 40 Kentucky 812 1.45 721 1 857 67 Louisiana 955 1.71 849 2 1,008 79 Maine 300 0.54 266 1 317 25 Maryland 1,138 2.04 1,012 2 1,202 95 Massachusetts 1,173 2.10 1,043 2 1,239 98 Michigan 1,612 2.88 1,432 3 1,701 134 Minnesota 820 1.47 728 2 865 68 Mississippi 724 1.30 643 1 764 60 Missouri 1,117 2.00 992 2 1,179 93 Montana 181 0.32 161 0 191 15 Nebraska 322 0.58 286 1 340 27 Nevada 424 0.76 377 1 447 35 New Hampshire 220 0.39 195 0 232 18 New Jersey 1,461 2.61 1,298 3 1,542 121 New Mexico 335 0.60 298
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A3.pdf
  • 1,147 90 Iowa 499 0.89 443 1 527 41 Kansas 484 0.87 430 1 511 40 Kentucky 812 1.45 721 1 857 67 Louisiana 955 1.71 849 2 1,008 79 Maine 300 0.54 266 1 317 25 Maryland 1,138 2.04 1,012 2 1,202 95 Massachusetts 1,173 2.10 1,043 2 1,239 98 Michigan 1,612 2.88 1,432 3 1,701 134 Minnesota 820 1.47 728 2 865 68 Mississippi 724 1.30 643 1 764 60 Missouri 1,117 2.00 992 2 1,179 93 Montana 181 0.32 161 0 191 15 Nebraska 322 0.58 286 1 340 27 Nevada 424 0.76 377 1 447 35 New Hampshire 220 0.39 195 0 232 18 New Jersey 1,461 2.61 1,298 3 1,542 121 New Mexico 335 0.60 298
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • CENTURYTEL OF THE GEM STATE, INC.-NV -18.55 3.44 -21.26 -71.49 552233 C RURAL TELEPHONE COMPANY - NV -6.02 -0.83 -5.23 -9.64 552284 C BEEHIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC., NV -15.51 -14.61 -1.06 -16.08 552302 C VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC.-NV -3.47 -2.45 -1.05 0.00 552348 C CENTRAL TELEPHONE COMPANY - NEVADA 3.03 -6.28 9.93 0.00 552349 C CHURCHILL COUNTY TEL. DBA CC COMMUNICATIONS 1.47 -1.99 3.52 2.84 552351 C LINCOLN COUNTY TELEPHONE SYSTEM INC. -3.90 2.02 -5.80 -45.83 552353 C MOAPA VALLEY TELEPHONE COMPANY 1.18 -1.92 3.16 0.00 552356 C RIO VIRGIN TELEPHONE COMPANY 19.63 4.83 14.11 0.00 553304 C HUMBOLDT TELEPHONE COMPANY 0.97 1.82 -0.83 0.02 554431 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF NV DBA FRONTIER COMM OF NV -6.36 -1.15 -5.27 -74.27 554432
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • 67 80 New Jersey 896,827 3.14 177 259 348 418 New Mexico 76,701 0.27 15 22 30 36 New York 2,867,919 10.03 566 828 1,114 1,338 North Carolina 846,146 2.96 167 244 329 395 North Dakota 70,727 0.25 14 20 27 33 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA Ohio 1,068,758 3.74 211 309 415 499 Oklahoma 419,998 1.47 83 121 163 196 Oregon 325,293 1.14 64 94 126 152 Pennsylvania 1,520,708 5.32 300 439 591 710 Puerto Rico * 0.46 26 38 51 61 Rhode Island 291,057 1.02 57 84 113 136 South Carolina 348,666 1.22 69 101 135 163 South Dakota 116,651 0.41 23 34 45 54 Tennessee 483,262 1.69 95 140 188 225 Texas 1,858,766 6.50
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.txt
  • 67 80 New Jersey 896,827 3.14 177 259 348 418 New Mexico 76,701 0.27 15 22 30 36 New York 2,867,919 10.03 566 828 1,114 1,338 North Carolina 846,146 2.96 167 244 329 395 North Dakota 70,727 0.25 14 20 27 33 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA Ohio 1,068,758 3.74 211 309 415 499 Oklahoma 419,998 1.47 83 121 163 196 Oregon 325,293 1.14 64 94 126 152 Pennsylvania 1,520,708 5.32 300 439 591 710 Puerto Rico * 0.46 26 38 51 61 Rhode Island 291,057 1.02 57 84 113 136 South Carolina 348,666 1.22 69 101 135 163 South Dakota 116,651 0.41 23 34 45 54 Tennessee 483,262 1.69 95 140 188 225 Texas 1,858,766 6.50
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • 215191 C SOUTHERN BELL-FL -9.37 -8.12 -1.36 0.00 GEORGIA TOTAL -6.23 -7.00 0.83 -22.31 220324 A VALLEY TELEPHONE CO., LLC 4.97 -8.49 14.71 0.00 220338 C QUINCY TEL. CO.-GA DIV. -1.51 -2.57 1.08 -20.11 220344 C ALMA TEL. CO., INC. -12.38 -1.98 -10.62 0.00 220346 C BLUE RIDGE TEL. CO. 1.21 -4.42 5.88 2.31 220347 C BRANTLEY TEL. CO., INC. -1.47 -2.74 1.31 -14.66 220348 C BULLOCH CNTY. RURAL TEL. COOP., INC. 14.72 -3.31 18.65 72.20 220351 C CAMDEN TEL. & TEL. CO., INC.-GA 0.17 -2.94 3.20 0.00 220354 C CHICKAMAUGA TEL. CORP. 5.84 -3.59 9.78 0.00 220355 C CITIZENS TEL. CO., INC.-GA -8.42 -6.14 -2.42 -42.66 220356 C COASTAL UTILITIES, INC. -10.12 -4.62 -5.76 -100.00 220357 C WINDSTREAM GEORGIA, INC.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A8.txt
  • Low-Income Households All Households 1984 to 1997 1997 to 2008 1984 to 1997 1997 to 2008 Ohio 1987 5.24 81.0% 88.5% 95.1% 7.5% * 6.7% 93.2% 95.0% 97.1% 1.8% 2.0% Oklahoma 1996 1.63 81.9% 78.9% 90.3% -3.0% 11.4%* 91.0% 91.8% 94.8% 0.7% 3.1% Oregon 1986 5.21 76.4% 90.5% 94.4% 14.1% * 3.8% 91.4% 95.3% 97.3% 3.9% * 2.0% Pennsylvania 1996 1.47 85.6% 93.6% 94.0% 8.0% * 0.4% 94.4% 97.3% 97.7% 3.0% * 0.3% Rhode Island 1987 5.25 86.4% 87.6% 90.5% 1.2% 2.9% 94.0% 94.6% 96.3% 0.5% 1.7% South Carolina 1995 5.25 66.1% 76.2% 82.8% 10.1% * 6.6% 85.1% 92.0% 91.8% 6.9% * -0.3% South Dakota 1988 0.40 84.6% 90.5% 91.3% 5.9% 0.8% 93.0% 94.7% 96.3% 1.7% 1.5% Tennessee 1992 4.78 71.1%
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301505A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301505A1.txt
  • 721 282 305 1,504 1,633 Interest Expense 444 1,399 3,507 3,390 213 202 155 140 432 405 Income Taxes 307 139 6,253 7,036 201 194 57 74 392 463 Net Income (Loss) 183 -250 11,951 12,867 418 366 73 103 683 769 Earnings per Share N/A - 1.94 2.16 3.72 3.56 0.24 0.38 4.50 5.22 Dividends per Share 0.13 - 1.47 1.61 0.26 2.17 - - 2.38 2.75 Average Shares Outstanding (millions) N/A - 6,170 5,958 113 103 257 243 154 147 Capital Expenditures N/A 364 17,717 19,676 326 287 234 231 829 686 Property, Plant and Equipment - Net 10,633 4,990 95,890 99,088 3,108 2,896 934 1,044 7,748 7,411 Total Assets 50,479 31,552 275,644265,245 8,185 8,254 2,020 2,087 8,901 8,371
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
  • 1.59 UTAH 0.41 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.16 0.27 1.48 VERMONT 0.67 0.09 0.00 1.54 0.00 1.50 0.42 0.66 4.87 VIRGIN ISLANDS 5.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.26 0.00 0.00 19.24 VIRGINIA 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.91 0.06 1.18 WASHINGTON 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.51 0.13 1.79 WEST VIRGINIA 0.20 0.01 0.00 1.61 0.00 0.17 1.47 0.19 3.64 WISCONSIN 0.71 0.06 (0.00) 0.00 0.00 1.62 0.00 0.41 2.80 WYOMING 3.49 0.04 0.00 2.80 0.00 3.22 1.45 1.05 12.06 INDUSTRY $0.69 $0.03 $0.00 $0.16 $0.00 $0.76 $0.30 $0.18 $2.12 Based on 2009 support payments and reported loops or lines from USAC filing for the Fourth Quarter 2009. Support Term Total High Cost Support Support Access Switching High
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.txt
  • 1.59 UTAH 0.41 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.16 0.27 1.48 VERMONT 0.67 0.09 0.00 1.54 0.00 1.50 0.42 0.66 4.87 VIRGIN ISLANDS 5.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.26 0.00 0.00 19.24 VIRGINIA 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.91 0.06 1.18 WASHINGTON 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.51 0.13 1.79 WEST VIRGINIA 0.20 0.01 0.00 1.61 0.00 0.17 1.47 0.19 3.64 WISCONSIN 0.71 0.06 (0.00) 0.00 0.00 1.62 0.00 0.41 2.80 WYOMING 3.49 0.04 0.00 2.80 0.00 3.22 1.45 1.05 12.06 INDUSTRY $0.69 $0.03 $0.00 $0.16 $0.00 $0.76 $0.30 $0.18 $2.12 Based on 2009 support payments and reported loops or lines from USAC filing for the Fourth Quarter 2009. Support Term Total High Cost Support Support Access Switching High
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305369A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305369A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305369A1.txt
  • on this proposal and on the specific text of the proposed rule, set forth as new subsection 64.604(c)(5)(iii)(C) in Appendix A, as well as any other registration requirements, guidance, or rules that would be appropriate for non-interconnected VoIP service providers.'' The following sentence is added at the end of paragraph 26: ``Lastly, we seek comment on whether to amend section 1.47(h) of our rules as set out in Appendix A to include providers of non-interconnected VoIP services among those required to designate a District of Columbia agent for service of process using the FCC Form 499-A in accordance with its instructions.'' The first sentence of paragraph 31 is corrected to read as follows: ``To meet the one-year statutory deadline with respect
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-155A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-155A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-155A1.txt
  • petitions and will address the arguments raised in them. In addition to the petitioners to deny, a number of individuals filed letters commenting on the proceeding. Those letters have been reviewed and considered in reaching our decision here. CBS and Viacom served their oppositions on the petitioners by facsimile, relying on �1.4(h) of our rules. We wish to clarify that �1.47, not �1.4(h), governs service requirements in Commission proceedings. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.47. The reference in �1.4 as to how to treat service by facsimile or electronic mail only relates to timing issues that arise when such service is specifically authorized by our rules. It is not a blanket authorization of service by such means. In this proceeding, no party
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-255A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-255A1.pdf
  • (FCC Form 499), which is used to calculate carriers' contributions to fund four different programs: interstate telecommunications relay service (TRS), federal universal service support mechanisms, the cost-recovery mechanism for the North American Numbering Plan Administration, and the cost recovery mechanism for the shared costs of long-term local number portability. In addition, to assist carriers in meeting the requirement of section 1.47 of our rules that all common carriers must designate an agent for service of process in the District of Columbia, we have allowed carriers to report such information on the Form 499. Our rules now provide that carriers may file the relevant portion of the Form 499 with the Commission to satisfy this requirement, and must update the information about
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-408A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-408A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-408A1.txt
  • PCIA Comments at 12; US West Reply at 22-23; PrimeCo Comments at 15-16; Southwestern Bell Reply at 4-5. But see NATOA Reply at 22-23 (asserting that proceedings addressing petitions for relief under Section 332(c)(7)(B)(v) will be inherently fact-based and, in some cases, may require more than 30 days for thorough consideration). See CCO Comments at 29-30. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.47. See US West Comments at 1; PrimeCo Comments at 17. See RF Procedures Notice, 12 FCC Rcd at 13552, � 142. See 47 U.S.C. � 301. See Cellular Phone Taskforce, 205 F.3d at 95-96. See Local Official's Guide at 10. The provision of such information is consistent with the operator's affirmative obligation to confirm compliance for all facilities that are
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.txt
  • 4.80 0.10 3.65 0.10 3.51 PO-1-08 OSS Interface - % Timeouts - EDI 0.10 0.25 1.53 0.64 PO-1-08 OSS Interface - % Timeouts - CORBA 0.12 0.36 0.40 0.12 PO-1-08 OSS Interface - % Timeouts - Web GUI 0.54 0.21 0.37 PO-1-09 Parsed CSR - EDI 2.75 3.17 2.76 4.12 2.69 2.36 2.70 2.41 PO-1-09 Parsed CSR - CORBA 2.75 1.47 2.76 1.12 2.69 0.47 2.70 0.46 PO-8-01 Avg Response Time - Manual Loop Qualification UD UD UD UD PO-8-02 Avg Response Time - Engineering Record Request UD UD NA NA OSS Interface Availability PO-2-01 Total - EDI 99.96 99.77 99.88 99.66 PO-2-01 Total - CORBA 100.00 99.79 99.95 99.83 PO-2-01 Total - Maintenance Web GUI (RETAS) 99.36 99.00 98.61 99.14
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A3.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A3.txt
  • 4.12 0.10 3.65 0.10 3.51 PO-1-08 OSS Interface - % Timeouts - EDI 0.10 0.00 0.40 0.41 PO-1-08 OSS Interface - % Timeouts - CORBA 0.12 0.00 0.28 0.16 PO-1-08 OSS Interface - % Timeouts - Web GUI 0.82 0.04 0.00 PO-1-09 Parsed CSR - EDI 2.75 3.17 2.76 NA 2.69 2.20 2.70 2.60 PO-1-09 Parsed CSR - CORBA 2.75 1.47 2.76 NA 2.69 NA 2.70 NA PO-8-01 Avg Response Time - Manual Loop Qualification UD UD UD UD PO-8-02 Avg Response Time - Engineering Record Request UD UD NA NA OSS Interface Availability PO-2-01 Total - EDI 99.96 99.77 99.88 99.66 PO-2-01 Total - CORBA 100.00 99.79 99.95 99.83 PO-2-01 Total - Maintenance Web GUI (RETAS) 99.36 99.00 98.61 99.14
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-282A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-282A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-282A1.txt
  • to Petitioners' Emergency Motion for Stay, Mpower Comm. Corp. et al v. FCC, No. 01-1280 (D.C. Cir. filed Jun. 26, 2001) at 8 n.8, Petitioners' counsel improperly failed to serve the parties (or Commission counsel) on the same day that they submitted the Petition to the Commission, and failed to include a proper proof of service. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.47(b), (c), (g), 1.106(f), 1.735(f); Letter from Anthony J. DeLaurentis, Attorney, Market Disputes Resolution Division, Enforcement Bureau, to James F. Bendernagel, Counsel for AT&T, Jonathan E. Canis, Counsel for BTI, and Cheryl A. Tritt, Counsel for Sprint, File Nos. EB-01-MD-001, 002 (Jan. 18, 2001). Because Petitioners submitted the Petition to the Commission Secretary on the last day for filing permitted by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-308A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-308A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-308A1.txt
  • other matter which may be of decisional significance in a Commission proceeding involving the pending application, the applicant shall as promptly as possible and in any event within 30 days, unless good cause is shown, submit a statement furnishing such additional or corrected information as may be appropriate, which shall be served upon parties of record in accordance with � 1.47. Where the matter is before any court for review, statements and requests to amend shall in addition be served upon the Commission's General Counsel. For the purposes of this section, an application is ``pending'' before the Commission from the time it is accepted for filing by the Commission until a Commission grant or denial of the application is no longer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-67A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-67A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-67A1.txt
  • Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 15996, at para. 63. On the next scheduled filing date for the Form 499-A, April 1, 2001, carriers will file the revised form containing the additional information described above in accordance with the Instructions to FCC Form 499-A. Third Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 15996, at para. 63. See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.47. Third Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 15996, at para. 64. See Third Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 15996, at para. 65. See Third Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 15996, at para. 65. See Third Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 15996, at para. 66. 47 U.S.C. � 258. See Third Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 15996,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-78A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-78A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-78A1.txt
  • Opposition at 1-3. First Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 22547-51, �� 115-125. AirTouch Petition at 4-13; ACTA Petition at 1-4; MCI Petition at 2-4. Bell Atlantic Comments at 2-3; TRA Comments at 4-6. First Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 22511-14, �� 32-37. First Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 22528, � 67; 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h). 47 C.F.R. � 1.735(d) (emphasis added). ACTA Petition for Reconsideration at 5. See Bell Atlantic Comments at 5. ACTA Petition for Reconsideration at 5. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.721(a)(8). First Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 22541, �100. BellSouth AD Petition at 2-5; SBC AD Comments at 2-3. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.729(i), 1.724(k)(5). TRA AD Comments at 3.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-85A3.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-85A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-85A3.txt
  • offset your salary, IRS tax refund, or other payments to collect that debt. The Commission also may provide this information to those agencies through the matching of computer records where authorized. With the exception of your employer identification number, if you do not provide the information we request on the worksheet, the Commission may consider you in violation of sections 1.47, 52.17, 52.32, 54.713, and 64.604 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.47, 52.17, 52.32, 54.713, 64.604, and 64.1195. The foregoing Notice is required by the Privacy Act of 1974, P.L. 93-579, December 31, 1974, 5 U.S.C. � 552(a)(e)(3), and the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, P.L. No. 104-13, 44 U.S.C. � 3501, et seq. * * * * *
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-107A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-107A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-107A1.txt
  • 0.37 0.37 0.50 0.98 1.52 Programming total $35.00 $33.87 $33.87 $33.51 $28.41 Standard error 0.33 0.34 0.28 0.41 0.98 Equipment $3.76 $3.76 $3.31 $2.00 $1.03 Standard error 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.22 0.22 Programming and equipment $38.76 $37.63 $37.18 $35.51 $29.44 Standard error 0.34 0.35 0.30 0.49 1.04 Number of channels 66.84 63.51 59.79 45.85 34.21 Standard error 0.80 0.96 0.84 1.47 2.01 Rate per channel � $0.529 $0.545 $0.584 $0.778 $0.899 Standard error 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.04 No. of satellite channels 48.91 47.15 46.05 36.19 26.88 Standard error 0.68 0.77 0.73 1.37 1.79 Rate per satellite channel $0.726 $0.739 $0.764 $1.026 $1.192 Standard error 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.05 0.07 July 1, 2000 BST $11.12 $10.54 $12.57 $16.23 $21.48 Standard error
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-153A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-153A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-153A1.txt
  • other matter which may be of decisional significance in a Commission proceeding involving the pending application, the applicant shall as promptly as possible and in any event within 30 days, unless good cause is shown, submit a statement furnishing such additional or corrected information as may be appropriate, which shall be served upon parties of record in accordance with � 1.47. . . For the purposes of this section, an application is ``pending'' before the Commission from the time it is accepted for filing by the Commission until a Commission grant or denial of the application is no longer subject to reconsideration by the Commission or to review by any court. See, e.g., 47 U.S.C. � 503(b). See Loop Qualification Letter
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-318A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-318A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-318A1.txt
  • no later than 21 days prior to such filing, the wireless carrier must notify the affected PSAP, in writing, of its intent to file such certification. Any response that the carrier receives from the PSAP must be included with the carrier's certification filing. (ii) The certification process shall be subject to the procedural requirements set forth in sections 1.45 and 1.47 of this chapter. (iii) The certification must be in the form of an affidavit signed by a director or officer of the carrier, documenting: (A) the basis for the carrier's determination that the PSAP will not be ready; (B) each of the specific steps the carrier has taken to provide the E911 service requested; (C) the reasons why further implementation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-318A1_Erratum.doc
  • no later than 21 days prior to such filing, the wireless carrier must notify the affected PSAP, in writing, of its intent to file such certification. Any response that the carrier receives from the PSAP must be included with the carrier's certification filing. (ii) The certification process shall be subject to the procedural requirements set forth in sections 1.45 and 1.47 of this chapter. (iii) The certification must be in the form of an affidavit signed by a director or officer of the carrier, documenting: (A) the basis for the carrier's determination that the PSAP will not be ready; (B) each of the specific steps the carrier has taken to provide the E911 service requested; (C) the reasons why further implementation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-329A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-329A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-329A1.txt
  • the Commission; or (b) any employee of the Commission; or (c) the United States government, is a party to a proceeding before the body or has an interest in the proceeding. With the exception of your employer identification number, if you do not provide the information we request on the Worksheet, the Commission may consider you in violation of sections 1.47, 52.17, 52.32, 54.713, and 64.604 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.47, 52.17, 52.32, 54.713, and 64.604. The foregoing Notice is required by the Privacy Act of 1974, P.L. 93-579, December 31, 1974, 5 U.S.C. � 552(a)(e)(3), and the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, P.L. No. 104-13, 44 U.S.C. � 3501, et seq. * * * * * Table
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.txt
  • 1 - 106000Avg Resp Pre-Order Addr Verif EDI-CORBA: Rndtrp 3.14 4.50 2.98 4.50 2.89 4.50 4.42 4.50 1.62 4.50 1 - 106002Avg Resp Pre-Order TN EDI-CORBA: Rndtrp 2.85 4.50 2.37 4.50 2.32 4.50 4.32 4.50 4.02 4.50 1 - 106003Avg Resp Pre-Order CSR EDI-CORBA: Rndtrp 2.6710.00 2.7010.00 3.1310.00 11.7410.00 1.4710.00 1 - 106005Avg Resp Pre-Order Svc Appt Sch EDI-CORBA: Rndtrp 1.47 2.00 1.31 2.00 1.18 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.11 2.00 1 - 106006Avg Resp Pre-Order Rej/Fail Inq EDI-CORBA: Rndtrp 3.30 tbd 4.90 tbd 3.89 tbd 8.75 tbd 3.64 tbd 1 - 106007Avg Resp Pre-Order Mech Loop Qual Actual - EDI- CORBA: Rndtrp 10.7610.34 16.23 9.60 11.2011.94 17.8112.10 15.6812.17 1 - 106008Avg Resp Pre-Order Mech Loop Qual Design - EDI- CORBA: Rndtrp
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-102A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-102A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-102A1.txt
  • band segment it wishes to use no earlier than 60 days before they plan to launch the first satellite in its system, and no later than 30 days before that date, by submitting a letter to the Secretary of the Commission. The licensee shall serve copies of this letter to the other participants in the processing round pursuant to Section 1.47 of this title. (2) The licensee shall request contiguous bandwidth in both the uplink and downlink band. Each licensee's bandwidth selection in both the uplink and downlink band shall not preclude other licensees from selecting contiguous bandwidth. (3) If two or more licensees in a processing round request the same band segment, all licensees other than the first one to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-102A1_Erratum.doc
  • band segment it wishes to use no earlier than 60 days before they plan to launch the first satellite in its system, and no later than 30 days before that date, by submitting a letter to the Secretary of the Commission. The licensee shall serve copies of this letter to the other participants in the processing round pursuant to Section 1.47 of this title. (2) The licensee shall request contiguous bandwidth in both the uplink and downlink band. Each licensee's bandwidth selection in both the uplink and downlink band shall not preclude other licensees from selecting contiguous bandwidth. (3) If two or more licensees in a processing round request the same band segment, all licensees other than the first one to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-305A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-305A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-305A1.txt
  • is inaccurate. Finally, the rule provides for notice of the certification to the PSAP with an opportunity to comment and requires notice of the intended certification 21 days prior to the filing, a copy of the certification when it is filed with the Commission, and adherence to the procedural requirements of our general rules at 47 C.F.R. �� 1.45 and 1.47. The certification must not be based on a carrier's own failures to comply with its implementation requirements. On reconsideration, petitioners request that we eliminate the rule and the certification requirements. Specifically, Cingular argues that the certification process exacerbates PSAP readiness issues and prescribes a difficult course of conduct for carriers. Nextel argues that the rules create a labyrinth of new
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-114A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-114A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-114A1.txt
  • of the petition and its service on SFUSD. Further, SFUSD contends, and we agree, that the petition did not comply with the verification requirements of Section 1.52 of the Commission's rules. However, in light of our decision to accept the GGPR pleading as an informal objection, we decline to dismiss it for failure to comply with the requirements of Sections 1.47 and 1.52. 6. The GGPR Reply. In its February 17, 1998, reply, GGPR raises two arguments for the first time: (1) that SFUSD lacked a designated Chief Operator and has failed to designate an Interim Chief Operator since November 4, 1997; and (2) SFUSD failed to comply with the terms of the Public Telecommunications Funding Program (``PTFP'') grant it received
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-102A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-102A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-102A1.txt
  • Tele- communication Service Providers $53,100,000,000 1 131,220,000 140,325,193 0.00264266 0.00264 140,184,000 CMRS Mobile Services (Cellular/Public Mobile) 210,000,000 subscribers 1 39,380,000 42,547,534 0.203 0.20 42,000,000 CMRS Messaging Services 6,500,000 subscribers 1 896,000 523,167 0.08 0.08 520,000 BRS2 LMDS 1,767 330 1 1 459,000 84,150 489,416 91,422 277 277 275 275 485,925 90,750 International Bearer Circuits 64kb circuits 5,300,000 1 7,261,000 7,764,832 1.47 1.47 7,791,000 International Public Fixed 1 1 1,800 1,925 1,925 1,925 1,925 Earth Stations 3,500 1 697,000 745,364 213 215 752,500 International HF Broadcast 5 1 3,825 4,090 818 820 4,100 Space Stations (Geostationary) 87 1 9,065,925 9,694,998 111,437 111,425 9,693,975 Space Stations (Non-Geostationary 6 1 674,550 721,356 120,226 120,225 721,350 ****** Total Estimated Revenue to be Collected 281,118,728 300,592,490
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-140A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-140A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-140A1.txt
  • Telecommunication Service Providers (per revenue dollar) .00264 Earth Stations (47 CFR part 25) 215 Space Stations (per operational station in geostationary orbit) (47 CFR part 25) also includes Direct Broadcast Satellite Service (per operational station) (47 CFR part 100) 111,425 Space Stations (per operational system in non-geostationary orbit) (47 CFR part 25) 120,225 International Bearer Circuits (per active 64KB circuit) 1.47 International Public Fixed (per call sign) (47 CFR part 23) 1,925 International (HF) Broadcast (47 CFR part 73) 820 FY 2006 Schedule Of Regulatory Fees (continued) RADIO STATION REGULATORY FEES Population Served AM Class A AM Class B AM Class C AM Class D FM Classes A, B1 & C3 FM Classes B, C, C0, C1 & C2 <=25,000 625
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-14A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-14A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-14A1.txt
  • service problem alleged here by NetworkIP, LLC. Thus, Network cannot complain about the Commission's attempts to work around NetworkIP LLC's rule violation and provide Network actual notice of the informal complaint. Moreover, especially in light of the absence of a registered agent, the address used to serve the March 2002 Informal Complaint qualifies as the ``last known address'' under rule 1.47(d), because (i) the individual addressee, Doug Williams, worked for a closely related affiliate of NetworkIP, LLC; (ii) the business addressee, ``Network IP, Inc.'', is so close to ``NetworkIP, LLC'' that any reasonable person would have suspected that NetworkIP, LLC was the intended recipient; (iii) though not of NetworkIP's headquarters, the address used was of a NetworkIP, LLC office containing collocation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-55A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-55A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-55A1.txt
  • Telecommunication Service Providers (per revenue dollar) .00264 Earth Stations (47 CFR part 25) 215 Space Stations (per operational station in geostationary orbit) (47 CFR part 25) also includes Direct Broadcast Satellite Service (per operational station) (47 CFR part 100) 111,425 Space Stations (per operational system in non-geostationary orbit) (47 CFR part 25) 120,225 International Bearer Circuits (per active 64KB circuit) 1.47 International Public Fixed (per call sign) (47 CFR part 23) 1,925 International (HF) Broadcast (47 CFR part 73) 820 FY 2006 SCHEDULE OF REGULATORY FEES (continued) RADIO STATION REGULATORY FEES Population Served AM Class A AM Class B AM Class C AM Class D FM Classes A, B1 & C3 FM Classes B, C, C0, C1 & C2 <=25,000 625
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-115A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-115A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-115A1.txt
  • review sets forth the issues sufficiently for us to address them. We also reject PSI's argument that the application for review was defective due to untimely service. See id. at 1-2. That the envelope was postmarked the day after service was required does not indicate that service is untimely, for service by mail is complete upon mailing, 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(f), i.e., upon deposit in a United States Postal Service mailbox, see Dena Pictures, Incorporated, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 90 F.C.C. 2d 105, 111 � 17 (1982). See AFR at 2. Id. Order, 21 FCC Rcd at 3035 � 7. See Order on Reconsideration, 22 FCC Rcd at 4605-06 �� 8-9. 47 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(3)(ii). See, e.g., LEOSAT Corporation, Memorandum Opinion
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-115A1_Rcd.pdf
  • application for review sets forth the issues sufficiently for us to address them. We also reject PSI's argument that the application for review wasdefective due to untimely service. See id.at 1-2. That the envelope was postmarked the day after service was required does not indicate that service is untimely, for service by mail is complete upon mailing, 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(f), i.e., upon deposit in aUnited States Postal Service mailbox, seeDena Pictures, Incorporated, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 90 F.C.C. 2d 105, 111 � 17 (1982). 33See AFR at 2. 34Id. 35Order, 21 FCC Rcd at 3035 � 7. 36See Order on Reconsideration, 22 FCC Rcd at 4605-06 �� 8-9. 3747 C.F.R. � 1.925(b)(3)(ii). 38See, e.g., LEOSAT Corporation, Memorandum Opinion and Order,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-32A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-32A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-32A1.txt
  • such circumstances, service is effectuated by mail. This process can be cumbersome and time consuming, for example when there are many parties to a particular proceeding, or when many documents in a particular docket must be served on the parties over the life of the proceeding. We seek to establish a more efficient approach. Accordingly, we propose to amend section 1.47 of the Commission's rules to allow the agency to serve parties to a proceeding in electronic form (e.g., email or an Internet-based notification system such as an RSS feed) following any change in the docket, to the extent the Commission is required to serve such parties. In a proceeding involving a large number of parties, we propose to satisfy the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-4A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-4A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-4A1.txt
  • other matter which may be of decisional significance in a Commission proceeding involving the pending application, the applicant shall as promptly as possible and in any event within 30 days, unless good cause is shown, submit a statement furnishing such additional or corrected information as may be appropriate, which shall be served upon parties of record in accordance with � 1.47. Where the matter is before any court for review, statements and requests to amend shall in addition be served upon the Commission's General Counsel. For the purposes of this section, an application is ``pending'' before the Commission from the time it is accepted for filing by the Commission until a Commission grant or denial of the application is no longer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-4A1_Rcd.pdf
  • other matter which may be of decisional significance in a Commission proceeding involving the pending application, the applicant shall as promptly as possible and in any event within 30 days, unless good cause is shown, submit a statement furnishing such additional or corrected information as may be appropriate, which shall be served upon parties of record in accordance with � 1.47. Where the matter is before any court for review, statements and requests to amend shall in addition be served upon the Commission's General Counsel. For the purposes of this section, an application is "pending" before the Commission from the time it is accepted for filing by the Commission until a Commission grant or denial of the application is no longer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-107A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-107A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-107A1.txt
  • Cir. 2009) (noting that agencies can interpret imprecise terms differently in separate sections of a statute that have different purposes); U S West Communications, Inc. v. FCC, 177 F.3d 1058, 1059-60 (D.C. Cir. 1999) (noting that the term ``provide'' used in different places in the Communications Act can be subject to different meanings depending on context). See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.47, 6.1, 6.3(e), 12.3, 43.11, 52.12, 52.13, 52.17, 52.21(h), 52.32, 52.33, 52.34, 52.35(e)(1), 52.36(d), 54.5, 54.706, 54.708, 63.60, 64.2003, 64.2005. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200 et seq. Pub. L. No. 107-198. 44 U.S.C. � 3506(c)(4). Location Accuracy FNPRM and NOI at Appendix. See 5 U.S.C. � 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. � 601 - 612, has been amended by the Small
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-150A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-150A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-150A1.txt
  • like other contributors to the TRS Fund, to register with the Commission using FCC Form 499-A. In addition, we sought comment on our proposal that the registration requirements for carriers and interconnected VoIP service providers be adapted as part of our TRS rules or incorporated into Section 64.1195 of our rules. We also sought comment on whether to amend Section 1.47(h) of our rules to include providers of non-interconnected VoIP services among those required to designate a District of Columbia agent for service of process using the FCC Form 499-A in accordance with its instructions. Discussion. As proposed, we require non-interconnected VoIP service providers with interstate end-user revenues to register with the Commission and designate a District of Columbia agent for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-151A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-151A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-151A1.txt
  • by the filing party on the attorney of record for each party to the proceeding, or, where a party is not represented by an attorney, each party to the proceeding either by hand delivery, overnight delivery, or by facsimile transmission followed by regular U.S. mail delivery, together with a proof of such service in accordance with the requirements of � 1.47(g) of this chapter. Service is deemed effective as follows: (1) Service by hand delivery that is delivered to the office of the recipient by 5:30 pm, local time of the recipient, on a business day will be deemed served that day. Service by hand delivery that is delivered to the office of the recipient after 5:30 pm, local time of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-154A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-154A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-154A1.txt
  • the Installment Payment Order to all seven of the other parties. TVCN's copy was sent to the email address that TVCN had listed on its application for review. Commission staff received no indication that the email was not delivered to TVCN's email address or that any of the other emails failed to reach their designated addresses. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(f) (``Service by mail is complete upon mailing.''). Commission staff sent a copy of the Installment Payment Order by certified mail on January 6, 2010, to each of the other seven parties, as well. United States Postal Service, Track & Confirm Web page. Id.; Petition for Extension. The February 3, 2010, delivery date is also on the certified mail receipt returned
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-154A1_Rcd.pdf
  • of the Installment Payment Orderto all seven of the other parties. TVCN's copy was sent to the email address that TVCN had listed on its application for review. Commission staff received no indication that the email was not delivered to TVCN's email address or that any of the other emails failed to reach their designated addresses. 9See 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(f) ("Service by mail is complete upon mailing."). Commission staff sent a copy of the Installment Payment Orderby certified mail on January 6, 2010, to each of the other seven parties, as well. 10United States Postal Service, Track & Confirm Web page. 11Id.;Petition for Extension. The February 3, 2010, delivery date is also on the certified mail receipt returned to the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-16A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-16A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-16A1.txt
  • addition to easing the practical burdens of participation on parties and members of the general public (for example, in some circumstances, our rules currently require the submission of an original and 14 copies of a filing), this reform will lessen the storage demands on Commission staff and promote more environmentally sustainable agency practice. 3. Electronic Notification in Certain Proceedings Section 1.47 of the Commission's rules requires agency service of copies of orders, pleadings, and other documents on parties to a proceeding when required by statute or regulation. Typically, such service is made by mail. As we observed in the Notice, this process can be cumbersome and time-consuming, particularly when many parties participate in a particular proceeding or when every document in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-181A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-181A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-181A1.txt
  • goes on notice pursuant to paragraph (c)(4) of this section. The Wireless Telecommunications Bureau shall establish by Public Notice the process for filing Requests for environmental processing and responsive pleadings consistent with the following provisions. (A) Service and pleading cycle. The interested person or entity shall serve a copy of its Request on the prospective ASR applicant pursuant to � 1.47 of this chapter. Oppositions may be filed no later than 10 days after the time for filing Requests has expired. Replies to oppositions may be filed no later than 5 days after the time for filing oppositions has expired. Oppositions shall be served upon the Requester, and replies shall be served upon the prospective applicant. (B) Content. An Environmental Request
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-181A1_Rcd.pdf
  • structure goes on notice pursuant to paragraph (c)(4) of this section. The Wireless Telecommunications Bureau shall establish by Public Notice the process for filing Requests for environmental processing and responsive pleadings consistentwith the following provisions. (A) Service and pleading cycle. The interested person or entity shall serve a copy of its Request on the prospective ASR applicant pursuant to � 1.47 of this chapter. Oppositions may be filed no later than 10 days after the time for filing Requests has expired. Replies to oppositions may be filed no later than 5 days after the time for filing oppositions has expired. Oppositions shall be served upon the Requester, and replies shall be served upon the prospective applicant. (B) Content. An Environmental Request
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-37A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-37A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-37A1.txt
  • by the filing party on the attorney of record for each party to the proceeding, or, where a party is not represented by an attorney, each party to the proceeding either by hand delivery, overnight delivery, or by facsimile transmission followed by regular U.S. mail delivery, together with a proof of such service in accordance with the requirements of � 1.47(g) of this chapter. Service is deemed effective as follows: (1) Service by hand delivery that is delivered to the office of the recipient by 5:30 pm, local time of the recipient, on a business day will be deemed served that day. Service by hand delivery that is delivered to the office of the recipient after 5:30 pm, local time of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-38A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-38A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-38A1.txt
  • set forth as new subsection 64.604(c)(5)(iii)(C) in Appendix A, as well as any other registration requirements, guidance, or rules that would be appropriate for non-interconnected VoIP service providers. We also seek comment on whether we should instead incorporate these registration requirements for non-interconnected VoIP providers into section 64.1195 of our rules. Lastly, we seek comment on whether to amend section 1.47(h) of our rules as set out in Appendix A to include providers of non-interconnected VoIP services among those required to designate a District of Columbia agent for service of process using the FCC Form 499-A in accordance with its instructions. Safe Harbor. As noted above in Section II.B., the Commission recognized in the 2006 Interim Contribution Methodology Order that some
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-46A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-46A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-46A1.txt
  • by the amount of time needed to process a hardcopy form, excluding management oversight and overhead. See 15 U.S.C. �� 7001-7006, especially at � 7001(b)(2). See 29 U.S.C. � 794D. In 1998, Congress amended the Rehabilitation Act of 1978 to require Federal agencies to make their electronic and information technology accessible to people with disabilities. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h); 47 C.F.R. � 64.1195(a); 2006 Contribution Methodology Order, 21 FCC Rcd at 7549 n.205. See 47 C.F.R. � 64.1195(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 64.1195(h); see also FCC Form 499 Filer Database, available athttp://apps.fcc.gov/cgb/form499/499a.cfm?CFID=178928&CFTOKEN=89260093& jsessionid=phZFPvyR1XSLz65gpBxVypXc1cg5G3hQltQL7KqHGRWjCNfW54s0!-6900652 46!1331832945195 (last visited Apr. 16, 2012). See 47 C.F.R. � 64.1195(h). Although this requirement was adopted in the context of combating slamming violations, the application of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-9A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-9A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-9A1.txt
  • serve the commenting or opposing party with a copy of the reply and shall include a certification that the party was served with a copy. Comments or oppositions and replies shall be served upon a party, its attorney, or its other duly constituted agent by delivering or mailing a copy to the party's last known address in accordance with � 1.47 of this chapter or by sending a copy to the e-mail address last provided by the party, its attorney, or other duly constituted agent. (8) Upon a finding of good cause, the Commission may lengthen or shorten any comment period and waive or establish other procedural requirements. (9) Persons filing petitions and responsive pleadings must include a detailed, full showing,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1999/fcc99057.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1999/fcc99057.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1999/fcc99057.wp
  • amended by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows: � 76.956 Cable operator response. (a) Unless otherwise directed by the local franchising authority, a cable operator must file with the local franchise authority a response to the complaint. The response shall indicate when the cable operator received notice of the complaint. Service by mail is complete upon mailing. See � 1.47(f) of this chapter. The response shall include the information required by the appropriate FCC form, including rate cards, channel line-ups, and an explanation of any discrepancy in the figures provided in these documents and the rate filing. The cable operator must file its response with the local franchise authority via first class mail. 11. Section 76.961 is amended by revising
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98090.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98090.wp
  • with a notice of the filing of the complaint. Such notice shall call upon the defendant to satisfy or answer the complaint in writing within the time specified in said notice of complaint. (2) All subsequent pleadings and briefs shall be served by the filing party on all other parties to the proceeding in accordance with the requirements of � 1.47 of this chapter. Proof of such service shall also be made in accordance with the requirements of said section. (E) Answers to complaints and amended complaints. Any party upon whom a copy of a complaint or amended complaint is served under this subpart shall serve an answer within the time specified by the Commission in its notice of complaint. The
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98233.pdf
  • LNP Cost Recovery Order , � 116; 47 C.F.R. � 52.32. 8 Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-233 E. Section 413 Agent for Service of Process 14. Section 413 of the Communications Act, as amended, requires all carriers subject to the Act to designate in writing an agent in the District of Columbia for service of all process.40 Pursuant to section 1.47(h) of the Commission's rules, carriers are required to file this information by letter with the Chief of the Formal Complaints Branch.41 F. Section 43.21(c) Revenue and Plant Data 15. Pursuant to section 43.21(c) of our rules, the Commission has required all toll carriers with operating revenues for a calendar year in excess of an indexed revenue threshold to file data
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Enforcement/Orders/2001/fcc01308.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Enforcement/Orders/2001/fcc01308.txt
  • other matter which may be of decisional significance in a Commission proceeding involving the pending application, the applicant shall as promptly as possible and in any event within 30 days, unless good cause is shown, submit a statement furnishing such additional or corrected information as may be appropriate, which shall be served upon parties of record in accordance with � 1.47. Where the matter is before any court for review, statements and requests to amend shall in addition be served upon the Commission's General Counsel. For the purposes of this section, an application is "pending" before the Commission from the time it is accepted for filing by the Commission until a Commission grant or denial of the application is no longer
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fcc97303.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fcc97303.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fcc97303.wp
  • by demonstrating that the facility in question does not or will not, in fact, comply with our RF guidelines.211 We believe that such a presumption would be consistent with Commission practice. Generally, we presume that licensees are in compliance with our rules unless presented with evidence to the contrary.212 In addition, 208See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.45 - 1.49. 209See Section 1.47 of the Commission's Rules concerning service of documents and proof of service. 47 C.F.R. � 1.47. 21047 U.S.C. � 332(c)(7)(B)(v). 211The Commission's RF guidelines and procedures are set forth in Sections 1.1307 of the rules. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1307. 212See Improvement of the Quality of AM Broadcast Service, MM Docket No. 88-376, First Report and Order , 4 FCC Rcd
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1998/fcc98056.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1998/fcc98056.wp
  • will determine whether a tendered document meets the pre-5:30 deadline. Documents filed electronically pursuant to � 1.49(f) of the Rules must be received by the Commission's electronic comment filing system before midnight. (h) If a document is required to be served upon other parties by statute or Commission regulation and the document is in fact served by mail (see � 1.47(f)), and the filing period for a response is 10 days or less, an additional 3 days (excluding holidays) will be allowed to all parties in the proceeding for filing a response. This paragraph (� 1.4(h)) shall not apply to documents filed pursuant to � 1.89, � 1.120(d), � 1.315(b) or � 1.316. For purposes of this paragraph service by facsimile
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Comments/fcc98055/209973-1.pdf
  • in which a service provider or manufacturer should communicate a response to a 41: See id. 71 132-134; see also Implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Amendment of Rules to Be Followed When Formal Complaints Are Filed Against Common Carriers, CC Docket No. 96-238, Report and Order, FCC 97-396 (rel. Nov. 25, 1997) 00 54, 67; 47 C.F.R Ej 1.47(h). 16 customer, especially if the Commission has determined that one form of communication is preferable to another. D. Procedures For Informal And Formal Complaints Should Address The Complexity Of Section 255 Issues To minimize confusion and increase efficiency, Commission rules for formal and informal complaints under section 255 that involve LECs should not deviate from those already in place for
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.wp
  • Filing of petitions. Petitions to deny and related pleadings may be filed electronically via ULS. Manually filed petitions to deny must be filed with the Office of the Secretary, 1919 M Street, Washington, DC 20554. (c) Service. A petitioner shall serve a copy of its petition to deny on the applicant and on all other interested parties pursuant to section 1.47. Oppositions and replies shall be served on the petitioner and all other interested parties. (d) Content. A petition to deny must contain specific allegations of fact sufficient to make a prima facie showing that the petitioner is a party in interest and that a grant of the application would be inconsistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. Such allegations
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
  • % Missed Appointment � Verizon � No Dispatch 0.28 0 0.04 0 0.07 0 0.03 0 0.02 0 PR-4-08-2100 % Missed Appt. � Customer � Late Order Conf. 0 0 PR-6 - Installation Quality PR-6-01-2100 % Installation Troubles reported within 30 Days 2.59 3.37 2.31 1.06 1.98 2.14 2.27 0.64 1.87 3.55 PR-6-02-2100 % Installation Troubles reported within 7 Days 1.47 2.02 1.41 0.71 PR-6-03-2100 % Inst. Troubles reported w/ in 30 Days - FOK/TOK/CPE 2.28 0.9 2.19 1.95 1.88 0.46 0.64 1.55 PR-8 - Open Orders in a Hold Status PR-8-01-2100 Open Orders in a Hold Status > 30 Days 0.02 0 0.01 0 0.01 0 0.01 0 0 0 PR-8-02-2100 Open Orders in a Hold Status > 90 Days
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Forms/Form499-A/499a-2012.pdf
  • 54.711, 64.604(b)(5)(iii)(B). 3 See 47 U.S.C. � 159(a), (b)(1)(A), (g) (authorizing the Commission to collect annual regulatory fees to recover the costs of enforcement, policy and rulemaking, user information, and international activities). 4 See 47 C.F.R. �� 52.17 (numbering administration), 52.32 (local number portability), 54.706 (universal service), 64.604 (interstate TRS). 5 47 U.S.C. � 413; see also 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h). 6 47 C.F.R. � 64.1195. 7 For this purpose, the United States is defined as the contiguous United States, Alaska, Hawaii, American Samoa, Baker Island, Guam, Howland Island, Jarvis Island, Johnston Atoll, Kingman Reef, Midway Island, Navassa Island, the Northern Mariana Islands, Palmyra, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and Wake Island. 8 Section 254(d) applies not only to "every
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011001.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011001.html
  • payment of the full amount of this Notice of Apparent Liability under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief, Revenue and Receivables Operations Group, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1914. Commission records indicate that Neclec, Inc. apparently has not designated an agent for service of Commission decisions, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h). Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be posted in the Office of the Secretary. In addition, a copy will be sent by Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested, to Neclec, LLC, 190 Old Derby, Suite 310, Hingham, MA 02043. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau Numbering Resource Optimization,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011002.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011002.html
  • payment of the full amount of this Notice of Apparent Liability under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief, Revenue and Receivables Operations Group, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1914. Commission records indicate that Net-Tel Corporation apparently has not designated an agent for service of Commission decisions, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h). Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be posted in the Office of the Secretary. In addition, a copy will be sent by Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested, to Net-Tel Corporation, 1023 31st Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20007. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau Numbering Resource Optimization, Report
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011004.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011004.html
  • the full amount of this Notice of Apparent Liability under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief, Revenue and Receivables Operations Group, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1914. Commission records indicate that North American Telecommunications Corporation apparently has not designated an agent for service of Commission decisions, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h). Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be posted in the Office of the Secretary. In addition, a copy will be sent by Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested, to North American Telecommunications Corporation, 875 Merrick Ave., Westbury, NY 11590. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau Numbering Resource Optimization,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011005.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011005.html
  • the full amount of this Notice of Apparent Liability under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief, Revenue and Receivables Operations Group, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1914. Commission records indicate that North County Communications Corp. apparently has not designated an agent for service of Commission decisions, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h). Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be posted in the Office of the Secretary. In addition, a copy will be sent by Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested, to North County Communications Corp., 3802 Rosecrans #485, San Diego, CA 92110. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau Numbering Resource
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011006.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011006.html
  • the full amount of this Notice of Apparent Liability under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief, Revenue and Receivables Operations Group, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1914. Commission records indicate that Optel Texas Telecom, Inc. apparently has not designated an agent for service of Commission decisions, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h). Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be posted in the Office of the Secretary. In addition, a copy will be sent by Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested, to Optel Texas Telecom, Inc., 1111 W. Mockingbird Lane, Suite 1000, Dallas, TX 75247. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011007.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011007.html
  • the full amount of this Notice of Apparent Liability under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief, Revenue and Receivables Operations Group, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1914. Commission records indicate that Paging Source USA, LLC apparently has not designated an agent for service of Commission decisions, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h). Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be posted in the Office of the Secretary. In addition, a copy will be sent by Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested, to Paging Source USA LLC, 240-19 Jamaica Ave, Bellerose, NY 11426. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau Numbering Resource Optimization,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011008.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011008.html
  • full amount of this Notice of Apparent Liability under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief, Revenue and Receivables Operations Group, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1914. Commission records indicate that R and G Distributors, Inc. apparently has not designated an agent for service of Commission decisions, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h). Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be posted in the Office of the Secretary. In addition, a copy will be sent by Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested, to R and G Distributors, Inc., 1665 W. 68th Street, Suite 201, Hialeah, FL 33014 and to its agent registered with the Secretary
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011009.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011009.html
  • of the full amount of this Notice of Apparent Liability under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief, Revenue and Receivables Operations Group, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1914. Commission records indicate that Trivergent Communications, Inc. apparently has not designated an agent for service of Commission decisions, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h). Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be posted in the Office of the Secretary. In addition, a copy will be sent by Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested, to Trivergent Communications, Inc., 301 N. Main Street, Suite 5000, Greenville, SC 29601. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau Numbering
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011011.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011011.html
  • the full amount of this Notice of Apparent Liability under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief, Revenue and Receivables Operations Group, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1914. Commission records indicate that Vanguard Cellular Systems, Inc. apparently has not designated an agent for service of Commission decisions, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h). Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be posted in the Office of the Secretary. In addition, a copy will be sent by Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested, to Vanguard Cellular Systems, Inc., 7277 164th Ave. N.E., Redmond, WA 98052. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau Numbering Resource
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011012.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011012.html
  • of the full amount of this Notice of Apparent Liability under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief, Revenue and Receivables Operations Group, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1914. Commission records indicate that Winsome Paging, Inc. apparently has not designated an agent for service of Commission decisions, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h). Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be posted in the Office of the Secretary. In addition, a copy will be sent by Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested, to Winsome Paging, Inc., 429 Broadway, Bayonne, NJ 07002. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau Numbering Resource Optimization, Report and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011044.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011044.html
  • determining the exact number of public and semi-public payphones may be difficult. We therefore encourage the parties to consider proxies that can be used to obtain a reasonable estimation of that number. Bureau Participation The Enforcement Bureau shall be a party to the proceeding and will determine its level of participation, as appropriate, on an issue-by-issue basis. Pursuant to section 1.47(c) of the Commission's rules, the Bureau shall be served with documents in the same manner as other parties. damages instructions Measure of Damages The scope of the hearing is limited to determining the proper amount of damages to which Complainants are entitled. The measure of damages is the amount of EUCL payments Defendants assessed and collected from the Complainants for
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01991.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01991.html
  • payment of the full amount of this Notice of Apparent Liability under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief, Revenue and Receivables Operations Group, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1914. Commission records indicate that Allpage, Inc. apparently has not designated an agent for service of Commission decisions, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h). Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be posted in the Office of the Secretary. In addition, a copy will be sent by Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested, to Allpage, Inc., P.O. Box 161184, Mobile, AL 36616. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau Numbering Resource Optimization, Report and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01992.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01992.html
  • of the full amount of this Notice of Apparent Liability under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief, Revenue and Receivables Operations Group, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1914. Commission records indicate that American Metrocomm Corp. apparently has not designated an agent for service of Commission decisions, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h). Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be posted in the Office of the Secretary. In addition, a copy will be sent by Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested, to American Metrocomm Corp., 1615 Poydras Street, New Orleans, LA 70112. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau Numbering Resource Optimization,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01994.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01994.html
  • of the full amount of this Notice of Apparent Liability under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief, Revenue and Receivables Operations Group, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1914. Commission records indicate that CDS Networks, Inc. apparently has not designated an agent for service of Commission decisions, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h). Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be posted in the Office of the Secretary. In addition, a copy will be sent by Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested, to CDS Networks, Inc., 2661 S. Pacific Highway, Medford, OR 97502 and to its agent registered with the Secretary of State of Oregon,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01996.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01996.html
  • of the full amount of this Notice of Apparent Liability under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief, Revenue and Receivables Operations Group, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1914. Commission records indicate that Core Communications, Inc. apparently has not designated an agent for service of Commission decisions, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h). Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be posted in the Office of the Secretary. In addition, a copy will be sent by Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested, to Core Communications, Inc., 209 West Street, Suite 302, Annapolis, MD 21401. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau Numbering Resource
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01997.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01997.html
  • of the full amount of this Notice of Apparent Liability under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief, Revenue and Receivables Operations Group, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1914. Commission records indicate that Digital Teleport, Inc. apparently has not designated an agent for service of Commission decisions, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h). Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be posted in the Office of the Secretary. In addition, a copy will be sent by Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested, to Digital Teleport Inc., 8112 Maryland Ave., 4th Floor, St. Louis, MO 63105. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau Numbering
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01998.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01998.html
  • payment of the full amount of this Notice of Apparent Liability under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief, Revenue and Receivables Operations Group, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1914. Commission records indicate that Fulltel, Inc. apparently has not designated an agent for service of Commission decisions, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h). Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be posted in the Office of the Secretary. In addition, a copy will be sent by Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested, to Fulltel, Inc., 210 Robert S. Kerr, Oklahoma City, OK 73102. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau Numbering Resource Optimization,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01999.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01999.html
  • for payment of the full amount of this Notice of Apparent Liability under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief, Revenue and Receivables Operations Group, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1914. Commission records indicate that IDS apparently has not designated an agent for service of Commission decisions, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h). Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be posted in the Office of the Secretary. In addition, a copy will be sent by Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested, to IDS Long Distance, 1525 N.W. 167th Street, Suite 200, Miami, FL 33169. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau Numbering
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01282.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01282.html
  • to Petitioners' Emergency Motion for Stay, Mpower Comm. Corp. et al v. FCC, No. 01-1280 (D.C. Cir. filed Jun. 26, 2001) at 8 n.8, Petitioners' counsel improperly failed to serve the parties (or Commission counsel) on the same day that they submitted the Petition to the Commission, and failed to include a proper proof of service. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.47(b), (c), (g), 1.106(f), 1.735(f); Letter from Anthony J. DeLaurentis, Attorney, Market Disputes Resolution Division, Enforcement Bureau, to James F. Bendernagel, Counsel for AT&T, Jonathan E. Canis, Counsel for BTI, and Cheryl A. Tritt, Counsel for Sprint, File Nos. EB-01-MD-001, 002 (Jan. 18, 2001). Because Petitioners submitted the Petition to the Commission Secretary on the last day for filing permitted by
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01308.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01308.pdf
  • any other matter which may be of decisional significance in a Commission proceeding involving the pending application, the applicant shall as promptly as possible and in any event within 30 days, unless good cause is shown, submit a statement furnishing such additional or corrected information as may be appropriate, which shall be served upon parties of record in accordance with 1.47. Where the matter is before any court for review, statements and requests to amend shall in addition be served upon the Commission's General Counsel. For the purposes of this section, an application is ``pending'' before the Commission from the time it is accepted for filing by the Commission until a Commission grant or denial of the application is no longer
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-153A1.html
  • any other matter which may be of decisional significance in a Commission proceeding involving the pending application, the applicant shall as promptly as possible and in any event within 30 days, unless good cause is shown, submit a statement furnishing such additional or corrected information as may be appropriate, which shall be served upon parties of record in accordance with 1.47. . . For the purposes of this section, an application is ``pending'' before the Commission from the time it is accepted for filing by the Commission until a Commission grant or denial of the application is no longer subject to reconsideration by the Commission or to review by any court. 18 See, e.g., 47 U.S.C. 503(b). 19 See Loop Qualification
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-3048A1.html
  • with respect to the Petition,25 it bears the burden of proceeding with the introduction of evidence and the burden of proving it is entitled to compensation above marginal cost with respect to specific poles.26 III.D. Bureau Participation 9. The Enforcement Bureau shall be a party to the proceeding and will determine its level of participation, as appropriate. Pursuant to section 1.47(c) of the Commission's rules,27 the Bureau shall be served with documents in the same manner as other parties. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES 10. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 224, and 405 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i), 154(j), 224, 405, and sections 0.111, 0.311, 1.106, and 1.1411 of the Commission's
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1889A1.html
  • 5771, 12. 9 Id. 10 FCC 05M-13 (rel. Mar. 17, 2005). 11 See.Judge's Ex. 2. 12 Id. at 1-2. 13 Id. at 4. 14 See Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 05M-16 (rel. Mar. 30, 2005) (``MO&O''). 15 Specifically, the MO&O concluded that the Show Cause Reply and its submission to the Presiding Judge were in violation of sections 0.401, 1.7, 1.47, 1.51(a)(1), 1.52, 1.209, 1.211, 1.291(a)(4), and 1.296 of the Commission's Rules. Id. at 2, 4. 16 Id. 17 Id. at 2, 5. 18 Id. at 2, n.2. 19 Id. at 3. 20 See Judge's Ex. 3. 21 Id. at 1. As noted above, the Media Bureau canceled the license for Station K216EQ on May 9, 2005. 22 See Dismissal Order,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-494A1.html
  • of Section 224(f)(1) and (2) of the Act, and Entergy shall have the burden of proving that the denial was lawful, once a prima facie case is established by the Complainants. A. Bureau Participation 22. The Enforcement Bureau shall be a party to the hearing before the ALJ and will determine its level of participation, as appropriate. Pursuant to section 1.47(c) of the Commission's rules, the Bureau shall be served with documents in the same manner as other parties. VI. ORDERING CLAUSES 23. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), and 224 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. SS 151, 154(i), 154(j), and 224, and sections 0.111, 0.311, 1.1411, and 1.1415 of the Commission's
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-14A1.html
  • service problem alleged here by NetworkIP, LLC. Thus, Network cannot complain about the Commission's attempts to work around NetworkIP LLC's rule violation and provide Network actual notice of the informal complaint. Moreover, especially in light of the absence of a registered agent, the address used to serve the March 2002 Informal Complaint qualifies as the "last known address" under rule 1.47(d), because (i) the individual addressee, Doug Williams, worked for a closely related affiliate of NetworkIP, LLC; (ii) the business addressee, "Network IP, Inc.", is so close to "NetworkIP, LLC" that any reasonable person would have suspected that NetworkIP, LLC was the intended recipient; (iii) though not of NetworkIP's headquarters, the address used was of a NetworkIP, LLC office containing collocation
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/materials/already-released/empirical120003.pdf
  • concentrated gender groups7. Examining our vector of content characteristics, we find that sitcoms and programs with characters aged 18-34 receive premia from advertisers, while news programs, Table 3 Determinants of Expected Advertising Price: The Full Model Regression Coefficients and Goodness of Fit Statistics (t-statistics in parentheses) Variable Estimated Coefficient t Statistic Log (Expected Share) 1.39*** (9.38) Log (Total Viewers) 0.05 (1.47) Percentage Upper-Income 0.01** (2.55) Percentage 18-34 -0.00 (0.02) Gender Concentration 0.01* (1.88) Sitcom 0.20** (2.52) News -0.26*** (3.81) Police -0.26*** (3.10) Genx 0.16** (2.06) Ethnic 0.08 (0.46) Teens or Children -0.12* (1.76) Sports 0.09 (1.01) Late 0.13* (1.97) Constant 7.01*** (22.27) Observations 71 Adjusted R-Squared .83 F-Statistic 27.74*** *** - significant at 99% confidence level, ** - significant at 95%
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/25/releases/fc980194.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/25/releases/fc980194.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/25/releases/fc980194.wp
  • other matter which may be of decisional significance in a Commission proceeding involving the pending application, the applicant shall as promptly as possible and in any event within 30 days, unless good cause is shown, submit a statement furnishing such additional or corrected information as may be appropriate, which shall be served upon parties of record in accordance with � 1.47. Where the matter is before any court for review, statements and requests to amend shall in addition be served upon the Commission's General Counsel. For the purposes of this section, an application is "pending" before the Commission from the time it is accepted for filing by the Commission until a Commission grant or denial of the application is no longer
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/28/releases/fc980194.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/28/releases/fc980194.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/28/releases/fc980194.wp
  • other matter which may be of decisional significance in a Commission proceeding involving the pending application, the applicant shall as promptly as possible and in any event within 30 days, unless good cause is shown, submit a statement furnishing such additional or corrected information as may be appropriate, which shall be served upon parties of record in accordance with � 1.47. Where the matter is before any court for review, statements and requests to amend shall in addition be served upon the Commission's General Counsel. For the purposes of this section, an application is "pending" before the Commission from the time it is accepted for filing by the Commission until a Commission grant or denial of the application is no longer
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/rss/index.htm?job=ainf&id=70
  • 114 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=70T hu, 15 Mar 2007 14:35:01 GMT Summary Permits: 120 construction permits in the FM broadcast service Qualified Bidders: 114 Rounds Completed: 27 Bidding Days: 7 Results for Round 27 Gross Revenue: $21,513,200.00 - Dollar Change: $380,700.00 - % Change: 1.80 Net Revenue: $18,539,050.00 - Dollar Change: $268,795.00 - % Change: 1.47 New Bids: 44 Withdrawn Bids: 0 Proactive Waivers: 1 Bidders that Reduced Eligibility: 7 Permits with PWBs*: 108 FCC Held Permits: 12 Eligible Bidders: 65 (of 114 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=70T hu, 15 Mar 2007 15:50:01 GMT Summary Permits: 120 construction permits in the FM broadcast service Qualified Bidders: 114 Rounds Completed: 28 Bidding Days:
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1999/fcc99057.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1999/fcc99057.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1999/fcc99057.wp
  • amended by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows: � 76.956 Cable operator response. (a) Unless otherwise directed by the local franchising authority, a cable operator must file with the local franchise authority a response to the complaint. The response shall indicate when the cable operator received notice of the complaint. Service by mail is complete upon mailing. See � 1.47(f) of this chapter. The response shall include the information required by the appropriate FCC form, including rate cards, channel line-ups, and an explanation of any discrepancy in the figures provided in these documents and the rate filing. The cable operator must file its response with the local franchise authority via first class mail. 11. Section 76.961 is amended by revising
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98090.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98090.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98090.wp
  • with a notice of the filing of the complaint. Such notice shall call upon the defendant to satisfy or answer the complaint in writing within the time specified in said notice of complaint. (2) All subsequent pleadings and briefs shall be served by the filing party on all other parties to the proceeding in accordance with the requirements of � 1.47 of this chapter. Proof of such service shall also be made in accordance with the requirements of said section. (E) Answers to complaints and amended complaints. Any party upon whom a copy of a complaint or amended complaint is served under this subpart shall serve an answer within the time specified by the Commission in its notice of complaint. The
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98233.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98233.wp
  • LNP Cost Recovery Order , � 116; 47 C.F.R. � 52.32. 8 Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-233 E. Section 413 Agent for Service of Process 14. Section 413 of the Communications Act, as amended, requires all carriers subject to the Act to designate in writing an agent in the District of Columbia for service of all process.40 Pursuant to section 1.47(h) of the Commission's rules, carriers are required to file this information by letter with the Chief of the Formal Complaints Branch.41 F. Section 43.21(c) Revenue and Plant Data 15. Pursuant to section 43.21(c) of our rules, the Commission has required all toll carriers with operating revenues for a calendar year in excess of an indexed revenue threshold to file data
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992744.doc
  • their complete tariff filings, including accompanying cost studies, upon all persons that filed comments to their 1999 annual access tariff filings. Parties filing comments and replies electronically are reminded they are still required to serve copies in accordance with Sections 1.773(a)(4) and (b)(3) of the Commission's Rules, and as stated herein. We waive the service requirement set forth in section 1.47(d) of the Commission's rules for these filings. III. ORDERING CLAUSE . Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Section 1.47(d) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(d), IS WAIVED for the purpose specified in paragraph 7 supra. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jane E. Jackson Chief, Competitive Pricing Division Common Carrier Bureau Access Charge Reform, et. al., CC Docket No. 96-262, et.al., First
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99175.pdf
  • NANP Funding Worksheet Notice). 20 See 47 C.F.R. � 52.32. See also All Telecommunications Carriers Must Begin Contributing To the Regional Database Costs for Long-Term Number Portability in 1999, Public Notice, DA 99-544, CC Docket No. 95-116 (rel. Mar. 15, 1999) (1999 LNP Worksheet Notice). 21 See 47 C.F.R. � 0.459. 22 See 47 U.S.C. � 413; 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h). 23 1998 Biennial Regulatory Review -- Streamlined Contributor Reporting Requirements Associated with Administration of Telecommunications Relay Services, North American Numbering Plan, Local Number Portability, and Universal Service Support Mechanisms, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Notice of Inquiry, FCC 98-233, CC Docket No. 98-171, 13 FCC Rcd 19295 (rel. Sept. 25, 1998) (Contributor Reporting 5 telecommunications carriers and certain other providers
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001668.doc
  • filing petitions and replies electronically are reminded they are still required to serve copies in accordance with these rules as stated herein. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Sections 1.773(a)(2) (iii) and 1.773(b)(1)(iii) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.773(a)(2) (iii), 1.773(b)(1)(iii), ARE WAIVED, for the purpose specified in paragraph 5 supra. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Section 1.47(d) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(d), IS WAIVED for the purpose specified in paragraph 7 supra. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Richard Lerner Deputy Chief, Competitive Pricing Division Common Carrier Bureau These expected filings will revise the tariffs filed by ILECs in the July 1, 2000 Annual Access Charge Tariff Filings. 47 C.F.R. � 61.13(b). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.773(a)(4) and
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00056.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00056.txt
  • with a notice of the filing of the complaint. Such notice shall call upon the defendant to satisfy or answer the complaint in writing within the time specified in said notice of complaint. (2) All subsequent pleadings and briefs shall be served by the filing party on all other parties to the proceeding in accordance with the requirements of � 1.47 of this chapter. Proof of such service shall also be made in accordance with the requirements of said section. (G) Answers to complaints and amended complaints. Any party upon whom a copy of a complaint or amended complaint is served under this subpart shall serve an answer within the time specified by the Commission in its notice of complaint. The
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00200.doc
  • with a notice of the filing of the complaint. Such notice shall call upon the defendant to satisfy or answer the complaint in writing within the time specified in said notice of complaint. (2) All subsequent pleadings and briefs shall be served by the filing party on all other parties to the proceeding in accordance with the requirements of � 1.47 of this chapter. Proof of such service shall also be made in accordance with the requirements of said section. (G) Answers to complaints and amended complaints. Any party upon whom a copy of a complaint or amended complaint is served under this subpart shall serve an answer within the time specified by the Commission in its notice of complaint. The
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00255.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00255.txt
  • (FCC Form 499), which is used to calculate carriers' contributions to fund four different programs: interstate telecommunications relay service (TRS), federal universal service support mechanisms, the cost-recovery mechanism for the North American Numbering Plan Administration, and the cost recovery mechanism for the shared costs of long-term local number portability. In addition, to assist carriers in meeting the requirement of section 1.47 of our rules that all common carriers must designate an agent for service of process in the District of Columbia, we have allowed carriers to report such information on the Form 499. Our rules now provide that carriers may file the relevant portion of the Form 499 with the Commission to satisfy this requirement, and must update the information about
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fc01085a.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fc01085a.txt
  • offset your salary, IRS tax refund, or other payments to collect that debt. The Commission also may provide this information to those agencies through the matching of computer records where authorized. With the exception of your employer identification number, if you do not provide the information we request on the worksheet, the Commission may consider you in violation of sections 1.47, 52.17, 52.32, 54.713, and 64.604 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.47, 52.17, 52.32, 54.713, 64.604, and 64.1195. The foregoing Notice is required by the Privacy Act of 1974, P.L. 93-579, December 31, 1974, 5 U.S.C. � 552(a)(e)(3), and the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, P.L. No. 104-13, 44 U.S.C. � 3501, et seq. * * * * *
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000471.pdf
  • portablity need only file the Telecommunications Reporting Worksheet for the purpose of determining their contributions to these mechanisms.2 As an attachment to that order, we released the initial version of the Telecommunications Reporting Worksheet. On July 30, 1999, a three-judge panel of the United States Court of 1 47 C.F.R. �� 52.1(b), 52.32(b), 54.711(a), 64.604(c)(4)(iii)(B). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h) (requiring every common carrier to file information concerning their designated agents pursuant to the Telecommunications Reporting Worksheet). 2 1998 Biennial Regulatory Review -- Streamlined Contributor Reporting Requirements Associated with Administration of Telecommunications Relay Services, North American Numbering Plan, Local Number Portability, and Universal Service Support Mechanisms, Report and Order, FCC 99-175, CC Docket No. 98-171 (rel. July 14, 1999) (Contributor
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000843.doc
  • 20554. Replies to these comments should be filed with the Secretary no later than April 28, 2000. The filing date of pleadings is the date of receipt. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. When filing pleadings, please reference the internal file number: CCB/CPD 00-10. Pleadings must also be served on the petitioner in accordance with the provisions of 47 C.F.R. �� 1.47. In addition, one copy of each pleading must be sent to: Neil Fried, Competitive Pricing Division, 445 12th Street, S.W., 5-B431, Washington, D.C. 20554; Wanda Harris, Competitive Pricing Division, 445 12th Street, S.W., 5-A452; and International Transcription Services (ITS), the Commission's duplicating contractor, at its office at 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036. Copies of filings are available for
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001137.doc
  • Street, S.W., TW-A325, Washington, D.C. 20554. Interested parties may file replies no later than June 12, 2000. The filing date of pleadings is the date of receipt. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. When filing pleadings, please reference the internal file number: CCB/CPD 00-15. Pleadings must also be served on the petitioner in accordance with the provisions of 47 C.F.R. �� 1.47. In addition, one copy of each pleading must be sent to: Neil Fried, Competitive Pricing Division, 445 12th Street, S.W., 5-B431, Washington, D.C. 20554; Wanda Harris, Competitive Pricing Division, 445 12th Street, S.W., 5-A452; and ITS, the Commission's duplicating contractor, at its office at 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036. Copies of filings are available for inspection and copying
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ldrpt103.pdf
  • 1945 0.21 2.09 1985 0.31 0.51 1946 0.20 1.79 1986 0.28 0.45 1947 0.19 1.52 1987 0.25 0.38 1948 0.19 1.37 1988 0.23 0.35 1949 0.19 1.40 1989 0.22 0.31 1950 0.19 1.42 1990 0.20 0.27 1951 0.20 1.37 1991 0.20 0.26 1952 0.20 1.35 1992 0.19 0.24 $1.01 $0.15 1953 0.21 1.38 1993 0.19 0.24 1.02 0.15 1954 0.22 1.47 1994 0.18 0.21 0.93 0.14 1955 0.23 1.52 1995 0.17 0.20 0.91 0.12 1956 0.23 1.52 1996 0.16 0.18 0.76 0.12 1957 0.24 1.50 1997 0.15 0.16 0.69 0.11 1958 0.24 1.46 1998 0.14 0.16 0.58 0.11 1959 0.24 1.47 1999 0.14 0.15 0.54 0.11 1960 0.24 1.44 2000 0.12 0.12 0.52 0.09 1961 0.25 1.47 2001 0.10 0.10 0.35
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • 4.43 4.28 4.10 1986 1.75 1.67 1.61 2.26 2.12 2.11 2.57 2.47 2.46 2.95 2.85 2.84 3.14 3.04 3.03 3.33 3.25 3.24 3.44 3.35 3.34 3.54 3.46 3.45 3.79 3.68 3.67 1987 1.48 1.45 1.46 1.89 1.85 1.86 2.09 2.04 2.06 2.38 2.32 2.34 2.56 2.51 2.52 2.75 2.70 2.70 2.95 2.90 2.92 2.96 2.91 2.93 3.08 3.04 3.04 1988 1.47 1.44 1.44 1.78 1.75 1.76 1.98 1.94 1.94 2.16 2.12 2.13 2.34 2.40 2.40 2.43 2.50 2.50 2.64 2.69 2.71 2.64 2.71 2.73 2.75 2.84 2.84 1989 1.71 1.70 1.70 2.01 2.00 2.00 2.21 2.15 2.20 2.21 2.15 2.20 2.30 2.15 2.25 2.31 2.15 2.30 2.40 2.35 2.35 2.50 2.45 2.45 2.50 2.45 2.45 1990 1.71 1.70 1.71 1.97 1.90
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 1.55 1.44 1.32 1.80 1.71 1.45 2.08 1.98 2.05 2.19 2.09 2.13 2.31 2.14 2.25 2.38 2.32 2.30 2.44 2.40 2.36 2.65 2.59 2.56 19861.05 0.99 0.98 1.35 1.29 1.28 1.54 1.48 1.46 1.77 1.70 1.68 1.88 1.80 1.79 1.99 1.91 1.90 2.06 2.03 2.02 2.12 2.09 2.08 2.27 2.24 2.23 19870.91 0.86 0.90 1.17 1.10 1.16 1.29 1.25 1.28 1.47 1.43 1.45 1.58 1.44 1.56 1.70 1.45 1.68 1.82 1.80 1.81 1.83 1.81 1.82 1.90 1.89 1.89 19880.98 0.86 0.90 1.19 1.08 1.15 1.32 1.24 1.28 1.44 1.37 1.40 1.56 1.44 1.56 1.62 1.44 1.63 1.76 1.75 1.77 1.76 1.77 1.78 1.84 1.85 1.86 19891.14 1.12 1.12 1.34 1.31 1.32 1.48 0.92 1.45 1.48 1.45 1.45 1.54 1.45 1.45 1.54
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 3.40 70BInsurance 356,818 6,791 1.90 1.77 71AOwner-occupied dwellings 673,525 - 0.00 0.00 71BReal estate and royalties 855,883 5,761 0.67 1.50 72AHotels and lodging places 88,331 1,186 1.34 0.31 72BPersonal and repair services 134,522 1,805 1.34 0.47 73AComputer and data processing services 419,702 9,237 2.20 2.40 73BLegal engineering accounting services 397,290 5,375 1.35 1.40 73COther businesses and professional services 653,498 9,601 1.47 2.50 73DAdvertising 213,214 586 0.27 0.15 74Eating and drinking places 394,950 1,573 0.40 0.41 75Automobile repair and services 282,793 2,350 0.83 0.61 76Amusements 216,302 1,842 0.85 0.48 77AHealth Services 798,018 7,865 0.99 2.05 77BEducational and social services 345,272 3,805 1.10 0.99 78Federal government enterprises 79,082 452 0.57 0.12 79State and local government enterprises 46,513 659 1.42 0.17 82General government industry
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 3.40 70BInsurance 356,818 6,791 1.90 1.77 71AOwner-occupied dwellings 673,525 - 0.00 0.00 71BReal estate and royalties 855,883 5,761 0.67 1.50 72AHotels and lodging places 88,331 1,186 1.34 0.31 72BPersonal and repair services 134,522 1,805 1.34 0.47 73AComputer and data processing services 419,702 9,237 2.20 2.40 73BLegal engineering accounting services 397,290 5,375 1.35 1.40 73COther businesses and professional services 653,498 9,601 1.47 2.50 73DAdvertising 213,214 586 0.27 0.15 74Eating and drinking places 394,950 1,573 0.40 0.41 75Automobile repair and services 282,793 2,350 0.83 0.61 76Amusements 216,302 1,842 0.85 0.48 77AHealth Services 798,018 7,865 0.99 2.05 77BEducational and social services 345,272 3,805 1.10 0.99 78Federal government enterprises 79,082 452 0.57 0.12 79State and local government enterprises 46,513 659 1.42 0.17 82General government industry
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref97.pdf
  • 15 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 Unlimited local calling 12.5812.4412.3212.3012.39 13.1013.1213.2213.2813.62 Federal and state SLCs 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 Taxes and 911 charges 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 1.85 2.00 2.03 2.17 2.24 2.34 Total for rotary service 16.1316.6616.5717.5317.79 18.6618.7018.9419.0719.49 Additional monthly charge for touch-tone service 1.57 1.52 1.54 1.52 1.47 1.17 1.08 1.04 0.74 0.49 (including tax) Total for touch-tone service 17.7018.1818.1119.0519.26 19.8319.7819.9819.8119.98 Lowest generally available monthly rate 5.96 5.81 5.67 5.67 5.68 6.18 6.22 6.43 6.47 6.68 Federal and state SLCs 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 Taxes and 911 charges 0.84 0.94 0.91 1.03 1.15 1.28 1.31 1.45 1.50 1.56 Total for rotary service
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • 1.8% 2.0% 1.9% 0.15 1982 1.13 4.07 4.80 10.18 0.9% 1.0% 1.0% 0.20 1983 1.76 4.09 5.15 11.38 $10.50 2.7% 3.0% 2.9% 0.20 1984 1.76 4.09 5.15 12.10 2.7% 3.0% 2.9% 0.20 1985 1.65 3.87 4.83 13.18 2.7% 3.0% 2.9% 0.22 1986 1.75 3.14 3.79 14.62 2.7% 3.0% 2.9% 0.25 1987 1.58 2.67 3.28 15.10 2.7% 3.0% 2.9% 0.25 1988 1.47 2.45 2.88 14.99 2.7% 3.0% 2.9% 0.25 1989 1.47 2.34 2.75 15.83 2.7% 3.0% 2.9% 0.25 1990 1.71 2.15 2.50 15.94 2.7% 3.0% 2.9% 0.25 1991 1.71 2.10 2.49 16.66 2.7% 3.0% 2.9% 0.25 1992 1.70 2.10 2.45 16.67 2.7% 3.0% 2.9% 0.29 1993 2.00 2.20 2.50 16.77 2.7% 3.0% 2.9% 0.29 1994 2.20 2.40 2.50 16.83 2.7% 3.0% 2.9%
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 1.8% 2.0% 1.9% 0.15 1982 1.13 4.07 4.80 10.18 0.9% 1.0% 1.0% 0.20 1983 1.76 4.09 5.15 11.38 $10.50 2.7% 3.0% 2.9% 0.20 1984 1.76 4.09 5.15 12.10 2.7% 3.0% 2.9% 0.20 1985 1.65 3.87 4.83 13.18 2.7% 3.0% 2.9% 0.22 1986 1.75 3.14 3.79 14.62 2.7% 3.0% 2.9% 0.25 1987 1.58 2.67 3.28 15.10 2.7% 3.0% 2.9% 0.25 1988 1.47 2.45 2.88 14.99 2.7% 3.0% 2.9% 0.25 1989 1.47 2.34 2.75 15.83 2.7% 3.0% 2.9% 0.25 1990 1.71 2.15 2.50 15.94 2.7% 3.0% 2.9% 0.25 1991 1.71 2.10 2.49 16.66 2.7% 3.0% 2.9% 0.25 1992 1.70 2.10 2.45 16.67 2.7% 3.0% 2.9% 0.29 1993 2.00 2.20 2.50 16.77 2.7% 3.0% 2.9% 0.29 1994 2.20 2.40 2.50 16.83 2.7% 3.0% 2.9%
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-95.pdf
  • 2.60 WASHINGTON 1,885 2,274 4,159 2.09 WEST VIRGINIA 536 645 1,180 0.59 WISCONSIN 1,340 2,014 3,354 1.69 WYOMING 205 165 370 0.19 Alaska and Other Territories na na 1,977 0.99 Total $85,319 $111,709 $199,005 100.00 -8 Table 2 Retail Revenue Interstate Instrastate Interstate + Intrastate Percent of Total (millions) (millions) (millions) ALABAMA $868 $1,500 $2,368 1.42 ARIZONA 1,232 1,225 2,457 1.47 ARKANSAS 526 803 1,329 0.80 CALIFORNIA 6,322 13,488 19,810 11.86 COLORADO 1,236 1,465 2,701 1.62 CONNECTICUT 1,082 1,406 2,488 1.49 DELAWARE 237 198 435 0.26 DC 372 409 781 0.47 FLORIDA 4,099 5,860 9,959 5.96 GEORGIA 2,085 2,884 4,968 2.97 HAWAII 269 424 694 0.42 IDAHO 321 329 650 0.39 ILLINOIS 2,701 4,408 7,109 4.26 INDIANA 1,177 2,070 3,248 1.94
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-96.pdf
  • 99,264,435 4,791,539 43,646,254 106,846,817 5,135,90746,609,938 76.20 5.55 $7,845 FIGURES MAY NOT ADD UP DUE TO ROUNDING. 26 Table 16 Interstate Switched and Special Access Revenue for 1996 Interstate Access Interstate Access Allocation Interstate End User Access Interstate Switched & Special, SOCC, 2.13 SOCC, Adjusted Percentage Access, TRS (Millions) TRS (Interstate Acc- End User) (Millions) (Millions) (Millions) (Millions) ALABAMA $350 $382 1.47 $381 $109 $272 ALASKA N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A ARIZONA 408 435 1.67 434 127 308 ARKANSAS 162 213 0.82 212 61 151 CALIFORNIA 2,395 2,433 9.33 2,427 852 1,575 COLORADO 466 487 1.87 486 125 360 CONNECTICUT 386 390 1.49 389 99 290 DELAWARE 82 82 0.31 82 25 57 DIST. OF COLUMBIA 163 163 0.63 163 30
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-99.pdf
  • 92.7 0.0 7.3 92.7 1.08 Maine 861,935 83.3 0.0 16.7 83.3 1.20 Maryland 3,840,931 99.8 0.0 0.2 99.8 1.00 Massachusetts 4,586,982 99.9 0.0 0.1 99.9 1.00 Michigan 6,531,214 84.4 12.4 3.2 96.4 1.04 Minnesota 3,069,719 73.2 13.8 13.0 73.2 1.37 Mississippi 1,420,042 93.4 0.4 6.2 93.4 1.07 Missouri 3,626,683 74.9 20.0 5.1 94.8 1.05 Montana 538,433 68.1 1.6 30.3 68.1 1.47 Nebraska 1,006,467 50.5 38.2 11.3 85.7 1.17 Nevada 1,317,578 27.2 70.4 2.4 95.5 1.05 New Hampshire 875,302 93.5 0.0 6.5 93.5 1.07 New Jersey 6,749,679 96.6 3.3 0.2 99.8 1.00 New Mexico 954,496 85.0 10.5 4.5 89.9 1.11 New York 12,818,544 89.5 8.3 2.2 96.7 1.03 North Carolina 5,093,322 50.0 35.9 14.1 90.2 1.11 North Dakota 417,866 60.8 0.0 39.2
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • Single-Line Single-Line and Business Centrex Business Business Centrex ALLTEL $4.35 $5.41 $6.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.003/ $0.003/ 180 17 82 BellSouth 4.35 6.96 7.84 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.48 14,845 2,527 6,736 Cincinnati Bell 4.35 6.07 6.22 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.08 650 87 297 Citizens 4.34 6.97 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.22 0.63 765 39 201 Global Crossing 4.35 6.05 8.34 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.24 648 81 263 Iowa Telecom 4.35 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 225 12 47 Qwest 4.35 6.39 8.33 0.00 0.00 2.78 2.78 10,371 1,767 4,748 SBC 4.35 5.14 5.65 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.11 31,160 7,093 19,038 Sprint 4.32 6.37 8.13 0.00 0.00 3.28 0.45 5,138 736 1,794 Verizon 4.35 6.40 7.41 0.00 0.00 3.55 0.55 35,491 6,458 16,905
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
  • Originating Access CCL CCL Local Minute OriginatingTerminatingSwitching BellSouth 0.00� 0.00� 0.36� 0.18� 1.10� 27,845 57,012 83,187 Cincinnati Bell 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.21 1.49 1,042 2,162 3,215 Citizens 0.57 0.00 0.87 0.65 3.69 2,747 2,865 5,680 Global Crossing 0.05 0.00 0.61 0.41 2.15 575 1,583 2,160 Iowa Telecom 0.81 0.00 0.84 0.15 2.90 134 185 331 Qwest 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.18 1.47 21,018 39,686 61,107 SBC 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.21 1.30 64,610 92,623 158,985 Sprint 0.03 0.00 0.63 0.17 1.68 10,375 15,681 26,235 Verizon 0.20 0.00 0.44 0.21 1.54 58,300 131,143 190,087 Price Caps 0.07 0.00 0.45 0.21 1.42 186,646 342,940 530,987 NECA 1.00 1.50 1.12 1.43 7.75 16,085 17,824 17,354 All Price Caps and NECA 0.15� 0.07� 0.47� 0.24� 1.69� 202,731
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • 339 730 Qwest 0.00 0.00 0.57 0.16 1.51 18,088 33,606 51,941 SBC 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.19 1.23 63,965 66,731 132,324 Sprint 0.00 0.00 0.60 0.14 1.51 5,825 19,008 24,880 Valor 0.00 0.00 0.79 0.41 2.45 332 1,016 1,348 Verizon 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.18 1.24 44,067 119,169 163,656 Price Caps 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.20 1.31 160,440 304,385 452,382 NECA 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.75 4.54 NA NA 19,168 All Price Caps and NECA 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44 160,440 304,385 471,550 NA - Not Available. 5 Data reflect only those company study areas subject to price-cap regulation. Source: Access tariff filings. Carrier Common Line 2 Effective 07/01/03, the carrier common line (CCL) rates for NECA carriers were eliminated. 3 Non-traffic sensitive charges include
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • 2.25 1984 103.9 0.32 0.57 1.05 0.30 1945 18.0 0.21 2.17 1985 107.6 0.31 0.53 1.01 0.29 1946 19.5 0.20 1.86 1986 109.6 0.28 0.47 0.97 0.26 1947 22.3 0.19 1.58 1987 113.6 0.25 0.40 0.99 0.22 1948 24.1 0.19 1.42 1988 118.3 0.23 0.36 1.02 0.21 1949 23.8 0.19 1.46 1989 124.0 0.22 0.32 1.02 0.19 1950 24.1 0.19 1.47 1990 130.7 0.20 0.28 1.00 0.17 1951 26.0 0.20 1.42 1991 136.2 0.20 0.27 1.02 0.15 1952 26.5 0.20 1.41 1992 140.3 0.19 0.25 1.01 0.15 $0.09 1953 26.7 0.21 1.43 1993 144.5 0.19 0.25 1.02 0.15 0.09 1954 26.9 0.22 1.52 1994 148.2 0.18 0.22 0.93 0.14 0.08 1955 26.8 0.23 1.58 1995 152.4 0.17 0.20 0.91 0.12 0.07
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
  • Originating Access CCL CCL Local Minute OriginatingTerminatingSwitching BellSouth 0.00� 0.00� 0.36� 0.18� 1.10� 27,845 57,012 83,187 Cincinnati Bell 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.21 1.49 1,042 2,162 3,215 Citizens 0.57 0.00 0.87 0.65 3.69 2,747 2,865 5,680 Global Crossing 0.05 0.00 0.61 0.41 2.15 575 1,583 2,160 Iowa Telecom 0.81 0.00 0.84 0.15 2.90 134 185 331 Qwest 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.18 1.47 21,018 39,686 61,107 SBC 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.21 1.30 64,610 92,623 158,985 Sprint 0.03 0.00 0.63 0.17 1.68 10,375 15,681 26,235 Verizon 0.20 0.00 0.44 0.21 1.54 58,300 131,143 190,087 Price Caps 0.07 0.00 0.45 0.21 1.42 186,646 342,940 530,987 NECA 1.00 1.40 1.59 1.43 8.62 16,085 17,824 17,354 All Price Caps and NECA 0.15� 0.07� 0.48� 0.24� 1.71� 202,731
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • 1.52 1987 113.6 0.25 0.38 1948 24.1 0.19 1.37 1988 118.3 0.23 0.35 1949 23.8 0.19 1.40 1989 124.0 0.22 0.31 1950 24.1 0.19 1.42 1990 130.7 0.20 0.27 1951 26.0 0.20 1.37 1991 136.2 0.20 0.26 1952 26.5 0.20 1.35 1992 140.3 0.19 0.24 $1.01 $0.15 1953 26.7 0.21 1.38 1993 144.5 0.19 0.24 1.02 0.15 1954 26.9 0.22 1.47 1994 148.2 0.18 0.21 0.93 0.14 1955 26.8 0.23 1.52 1995 152.4 0.17 0.20 0.91 0.12 1956 27.2 0.23 1.52 1996 156.9 0.16 0.18 0.76 0.12 1957 28.1 0.24 1.50 1997 160.5 0.15 0.16 0.69 0.11 1958 28.9 0.24 1.46 1998 163.0 0.14 0.16 0.58 0.11 1959 29.1 0.24 1.47 1999 166.6 0.14 0.15 0.54 0.11 1960 29.6 0.24 1.44
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd98.pdf
  • of Billed To Retained of from Billed To Retained from U.S. retained & Minutes Revenue PTT Revenue Minutes PTT Revenue PTT Revenue PTT foreign receipts 1964 2/ 20 $63 $30 $33 12 $20 $3.11 $1.50 $1.62 $1.63 $1.62 1965 2/ 26 78 37 41 15 25 3.07 1.46 1.61 1.60 1.61 1966 2/ 32 100 48 53 19 30 3.10 1.47 1.63 1.59 1.61 1967 2/ 40 114 55 60 23 32 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46 127 62 65 28 40 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 65 172 83 89 38 52 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81 197 99 98 51 60 2.43 1.22 1.21 1.17 1.19 1971 101 237 121 117 68 75 2.35
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd99.pdf
  • of Billed To Retained of from Billed To Retained from U.S. retained & Minutes Revenue PTT Revenue Minutes PTT Revenue PTT Revenue PTT foreign receipts 1964 2/ 20 $63 $30 $33 12 $20 $3.11 $1.50 $1.62 $1.63 $1.62 1965 2/ 26 78 37 41 15 25 3.07 1.46 1.61 1.60 1.61 1966 2/ 32 100 48 53 19 30 3.10 1.47 1.63 1.59 1.61 1967 2/ 40 114 55 60 23 32 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46 127 62 65 28 40 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 65 172 83 89 38 52 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81 197 99 98 51 60 2.43 1.22 1.21 1.17 1.19 1971 101 237 121 117 68 75 2.35
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd00.pdf
  • to Retained of from Billed to Retained from Revenues for Minutes Revenues PTT Revenues Minutes PTT Revenues PTT Revenues PTT all U.S. and 4/ 5/ 4/ Foreign Minutes 1964 20.2 $62.9 $30.3 $32.6 12.0 $19.6 $3.11 $1.50 $1.62 $1.63 $1.62 1965 25.5 78.2 37.2 41.1 15.4 24.7 3.07 1.46 1.61 1.60 1.61 1966 32.3 100.1 47.6 52.5 18.9 30.1 3.10 1.47 1.63 1.59 1.61 1967 39.7 114.2 54.6 59.6 23.4 31.8 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46.4 126.9 61.5 65.4 28.2 40.0 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 64.6 172.0 82.7 89.4 38.3 51.6 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81.1 196.6 98.9 97.7 51.0 59.8 2.43 1.22 1.21 1.17 1.19 1971 100.9 237.4 120.7 116.6 68.4 75.1 2.35 1.20
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd01.pdf
  • to Revenues of from Billed to Revenues from Revenues Minutes Revenues Foreign Minutes Foreign RevenuesForeign Foreign for all U.S. 4/ Carriers Carriers 6/ Carriers Carriers and Foreign Minutes 1964 20.2 $62.9 $30.3 $32.6 12.0 $19.6 $3.11 $1.50 $1.62 $1.63 $1.62 1965 25.5 78.2 37.2 41.1 15.4 24.7 3.07 1.46 1.61 1.60 1.61 1966 32.3 100.1 47.6 52.5 18.9 30.1 3.10 1.47 1.63 1.59 1.61 1967 39.7 114.2 54.6 59.6 23.4 31.8 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46.4 126.9 61.5 65.4 28.2 40.0 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 64.6 172.0 82.7 89.4 38.3 51.6 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81.1 196.6 98.9 97.7 51.0 59.8 2.43 1.22 1.21 1.17 1.19 1971 100.9 237.4 120.7 116.6 68.4 75.1 2.35 1.20
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-1.pdf
  • 1.00 Idaho 762,986 90.8 1.10 Illinois 8,012,870 95.0 1.05 Indiana 3,803,634 95.4 1.05 Iowa 1,704,785 64.9 1.54 Kansas 1,666,630 84.1 1.19 Kentucky 2,206,741 88.7 1.13 Louisiana 2,575,040 92.5 1.08 Maine 883,970 82.8 1.21 Maryland 3,940,615 99.8 1.00 Massachusetts 4,410,394 99.9 1.00 Michigan 6,149,365 96.2 1.04 Minnesota 3,136,277 73.1 1.37 Mississippi 1,443,215 93.3 1.07 Missouri 3,630,138 91.1 1.10 Montana 553,795 68.0 1.47 Nebraska 955,957 79.3 1.26 Nevada 1,349,473 95.5 1.05 New Hampshire 855,403 93.1 1.07 New Jersey 6,923,410 99.8 1.00 New Mexico 1,003,993 85.2 1.17 New York 13,076,558 96.7 1.03 North Carolina 5,106,719 89.9 1.11 North Dakota 392,284 54.1 1.85 N. Mariana Islands 21,521 0.0 NA Ohio 7,053,650 95.1 1.05 Oklahoma 2,035,796 82.0 1.22 Oregon 2,171,014 92.0 1.09 Pennsylvania 8,301,408 95.5 1.05
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • -2.55 -19.50 320825 C SUNMAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION -2.36 -0.27 -2.10 -11.81 320826 A SWAYZEE TEL. CO., INC. 12.71 -0.68 13.48 132.40 320827 A SWEETSER RURAL TEL. CO., INC. 14.06 0.71 13.25 INFINITE 320828 C FRONTIER COMM. OF THORNTOWN, INC. -2.15 4.91 -6.73 0.00 320829 A TIPTON TEL. CO., INC. 10.06 1.05 8.92 0.00 320830 A TRI-COUNTY TEL. CO., INC.-IN 14.61 1.47 12.95 117.15 320832 C UNITED TEL. CO. OF INDIANA, INC. 1.10 3.66 -2.47 0.00 320834 A WASHINGTON CTY. RURAL TEL. COOP., INC. 13.31 2.11 10.97 0.00 320837 A WEST POINT TEL. CO., INC. 16.09 3.68 11.97 72.08 320839 A YEOMAN TEL. CO., INC. 12.86 -0.62 13.57 173.46 323034 C VERIZON NORTH INC.-IN (ALLTEL) -3.50 0.43 -3.91 -100.00 325080 C INDIANA
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • 11.05 66.09 351297 A HEART OF IOWA COMMUNICATIONS COOP. 0.25 -2.94 3.29 -1.74 351298 A SOUTH SLOPE COOP. TEL. CO. 10.56 -0.02 10.58 0.00 351298A A SOUTH SLOPE COOP. TEL. CO. 10.40 -0.92 11.42 202.21 351301 A SOUTHWEST TEL. EXCH., INC. 3.19 2.46 0.71 -3.56 351302 A SPRINGVILLE COOP. TEL. ASSN. 9.96 -1.28 11.38 126.65 351303 A COOPERATIVE TEL. EXCHANGE 1.47 -1.82 3.36 -0.45 351304 A SWISHER TEL. CO. 10.62 0.49 10.08 53.40 351305 A STRATFORD MUTUAL TEL. CO. 8.69 -0.94 9.72 36.88 351306 A SULLY TEL. ASSOC. 57.06 51.74 3.50 52.66 351307 A SUPERIOR TEL. COOP. -5.18 -6.02 0.89 -10.61 351308 A TEMPLETON TEL. CO. 1.59 -3.73 5.53 5.27 351309 A TERRIL TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE 3.96 -2.13 6.22 10.40 351310 A
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
  • 339 730 Qwest 0.00 0.00 0.57 0.16 1.51 18,088 33,606 51,941 SBC 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.19 1.23 63,965 66,731 132,324 Sprint 0.00 0.00 0.60 0.14 1.51 5,825 19,008 24,880 Valor 0.00 0.00 0.79 0.41 2.45 332 1,016 1,348 Verizon 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.18 1.24 44,067 119,169 163,656 Price Caps 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.20 1.31 160,440 304,385 452,382 NECA 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.75 4.54 NA NA 19,168 All Price Caps and NECA 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44 160,440 304,385 471,550 NA: Not Available. * ** #Data reflect only those company study areas subject to price-cap regulation. Source: Access tariff filings. Effective 07/01/03, the carrier common line (CCL) rates for NECA carriers were eliminated. Minute Non-traffic sensitive charges include charges assessed on a
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-9.pdf
  • Line-Minutes per 1,000 Access Lines 5,524.8 765.3 1,070.2 4,397.2 305.5 1,169.5 4,042.8 3,395.8 3,599.8 For Scheduled Downtime More than 2 Minutes Number of Occurrences or Events 182 37 15 5 13 144 239 24 39 Events per Hundred Switches 12.9 2.6 0.9 0.4 1.6 9.6 14.3 0.5 2.4 Events per Million Access Lines 9.92 1.93 0.74 0.31 0.73 10.44 16.70 1.47 5.94 Average Outage Duration in Minutes 3.4 3.3 2.9 7.3 4.9 3.5 3.7 11.0 18.6 Avg. Lines Affected per Event in Thousands 23.8 27.1 32.5 22.2 20.2 11.9 7.2 7.9 7.1 Outage Line-Minutes per Event in Thousands 77.7 80.7 97.6 220.5 67.5 47.7 45.6 54.8 56.8 Outage Line-Minutes per 1,000 Access Lines 770.3 155.8 72.6 69.1 49.6 497.7 762.0 80.3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-9.pdf
  • Repairs: Residential 12.39 12.28 10.19 12.69 15.57 7.59 7.65 11.00 Small Business 11.71 10.46 8.30 11.43 9.72 5.95 8.54 12.52 Large Business 12.60 14.58 5.38 13.25 9.57 8.03 NA 2.49 Business Office: Residential 8.91 5.35 7.60 6.76 6.76 6.32 2.14 2.13 Small Business 9.61 9.52 7.99 8.11 9.36 5.80 5.02 4.76 Large Business 9.27 11.61 4.28 8.17 7.68 5.34 NA 1.47 Please refer to text for notes and data qualifications 9 - 23 Table 9.5(a): Company Comparision -- 1996 Customer Perception Surveys Sample Sizes Company Ameritech Bell Atlantic BellSouth NYNEX Pacific SBC US West GTE Overall: Residential 7,269 4,486 159,902 3,805 70,539 59,701 7,496 13,838 Small Business 6,530 2,768 120,400 3,156 68,727 59,740 7,451 13,204 Large Business 5,001 554 8,863 8,054
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-9.pdf
  • 4.06 Repairs:Residential 12.39 12.28 10.19 12.69 15.57 7.59 7.65 11.00 Small Business 11.71 10.46 8.30 11.43 9.72 5.95 8.54 12.52 Large Business 12.60 14.58 5.38 13.25 9.57 8.03 NA 2.49 Business Office: Residential 8.91 5.35 7.60 6.76 6.76 6.32 2.14 2.13 Small Business 9.61 9.52 7.99 8.11 9.36 5.80 5.02 4.76 Large Business 9.27 11.61 4.28 8.17 7.68 5.34 NA 1.47 Please refer to text for notes and data qualifications 9 - 15 Table 9.5: Company Comparision -- 1998 Customer Perception Surveys Company Ameritech Bell Atlantic BellSouth NYNEXPacific SBCUS West GTE Sample Sizes -- Customer Perception Surveys Installations: Residential 28,568 12,767 49,182 17,86518,905 13,426 2,361 27,277 Small Business 27,746 12,627 26,156 17,46518,223 16,197 2,584 27,328 Large Business 1,421 2,304 NA 2,518
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • Single-Line Single-Line and Business Centrex Business Business Centrex AllTel $4.35 $5.41 $6.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 180 17 82 BellSouth 4.35 6.96 7.84 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.48 14,845 2,527 6,736 Cincinnati Bell 4.35 6.07 6.22 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.08 650 87 297 Citizens 4.34 6.97 9.12 0.00 0.00 4.22 0.63 765 39 201 Global Crossing 4.35 6.05 8.34 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.24 648 81 263 Iowa Telecom 4.35 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.86 225 12 47 Qwest 4.35 6.39 8.33 0.00 0.00 2.78 2.78 10,371 1,767 4,748 SBC 4.35 5.14 5.65 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.11 31,160 7,093 19,038 Sprint 4.32 6.37 8.13 0.00 0.00 3.28 0.45 5,138 736 1,794 Verizon 4.35 6.40 7.41 0.00 0.00 3.55 0.55 35,491 6,458 16,905
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* MINNESOTA (CONT.) 361373 A CONSOLIDATED TEL. CO.-MN 8.43 7.69 0.68 -6.54 361374 C ARROWHEAD COMM. CORP. 6.80 2.11 4.59 9.25 361375 A MID-COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 7.35 3.72 3.50 29.22 361380 A DELAVAN TEL. CO. 15.81 2.69 12.77 79.71 361381 A DUNNELL TEL. CO., INC. 13.68 1.47 12.03 66.09 361383 C EAGLE VALLEY TEL. CO. -3.91 3.71 -7.35 -20.82 361384 A EASTON TEL. CO. 15.26 2.40 12.56 73.81 361385 C EAST OTTER TAIL TEL. CO. 1.72 4.16 -2.34 -11.20 361386 A ECKLES TEL. CO. 12.85 4.00 8.51 0.00 361387 C EMILY COOP. TEL. CO. -3.68 3.29 -6.75 -30.17 361389 A FARMERS MUTUAL TEL. CO.-BELLINGHAM 15.14 1.46 13.48
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • 1.00 Idaho 769,877 90.7 1.10 Illinois 8,211,379 95.8 1.04 Indiana 3,710,627 95.5 1.05 Iowa 1,729,098 73.5 1.36 Kansas 1,732,809 84.4 1.19 Kentucky 2,225,549 86.6 1.15 Louisiana 2,612,644 92.6 1.08 Maine 873,935 83.1 1.20 Maryland 3,932,364 99.8 1.00 Massachusetts 4,531,432 99.9 1.00 Michigan 6,478,361 96.4 1.04 Minnesota 3,202,647 73.4 1.36 Mississippi 1,453,578 93.4 1.07 Missouri 3,696,167 93.0 1.08 Montana 559,538 68.1 1.47 Nebraska 1,015,125 82.7 1.21 Nevada 1,336,888 95.4 1.05 New Hampshire 860,595 93.3 1.07 New Jersey 6,927,404 99.8 1.00 New Mexico 1,009,203 87.6 1.14 New York 13,230,572 96.7 1.03 North Carolina 5,213,187 90.1 1.11 North Dakota 397,442 57.5 1.74 N. Mariana Islands 20,990 0.0 NA Ohio 7,001,888 95.1 1.05 Oklahoma 2,110,393 85.4 1.17 Oregon 2,206,230 91.9 1.09 Pennsylvania 8,385,348 95.3 1.05
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/QualSvc/qual98.pdf
  • Repairs: Residential 12.39 12.28 10.19 12.69 15.57 7.59 7.65 11.00 Small Business 11.71 10.46 8.30 11.43 9.72 5.95 8.54 12.52 Large Business 12.60 14.58 5.38 13.25 9.57 8.03 NA 2.49 Business Office: Residential 8.91 5.35 7.60 6.76 6.76 6.32 2.14 2.13 Small Business 9.61 9.52 7.99 8.11 9.36 5.80 5.02 4.76 Large Business 9.27 11.61 4.28 8.17 7.68 5.34 NA 1.47 Please refer to text for notes and data qualifications Table 3(e): Company Comparision -- 1998 Customer Perception Surveys Company Ameritech Bell Atlantic BellSouth NYNEX Pacific SBC US West GTE Sample Sizes -- Customer Perception Surveys Installations: Residential 28,568 12,767 49,182 17,865 18,905 13,426 2,361 27,277 Small Business 27,746 12,627 26,156 17,465 18,223 16,197 2,584 27,328 Large Business 1,421 2,304 NA
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/00socc.pdf
  • Sierra Leone 3.00 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 0.77 0.75 Singapore 1.10 1.20 0.97 0.85 0.86 0.92 0.92 0.90 0.85 0.52 0.30 0.30 0.30 South Africa 2.00 2.00 1.80 1.80 1.50 1.20 1.20 1.00 1.00 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.38 Spain 10/ 2.10 2.28 2.15 2.06 1.80 1.78 1.44 0.64 0.48 0.26 0.27 0.26 0.25 Switzerland 1.47 1.59 1.16 1.11 0.84 0.91 0.52 0.51 0.34 0.28 0.27 0.26 0.25 Taiwan 1.90 1.80 1.60 1.40 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.14 0.45 0.30 0.30 0.30 Thailand 2.30 2.30 2.00 1.75 1.60 1.60 1.55 1.50 1.20 0.90 0.60 0.48 0.38 Turkey 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.93 1.66 1.78 1.63 1.16 0.82 0.76 0.66 0.51 0.41 United Kingdom 10/ 1.06 1.06 0.97
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/01socc.pdf
  • 221.7 541.5 20.778AZ Arkansas 266.7 266.7 79.3 187.3 75.3 31.7 80.3 187.3 AR California 4,711.3 22.29 4,689.1 1,360.8 3,328.3 1,588.5 311.0 1,428.5 3,328.0 0.287CA Colorado 729.4 13.25 716.1 104.7 611.5 233.2 90.7 266.0 589.9 21.539CO Connecticut 550.2 550.2 43.9 506.2 183.4 84.1 238.8 506.2 CT Delaware 102.3 2.22 100.0 10.8 89.3 30.0 12.8 46.4 89.1 0.124DE District of Columbia 200.0 1.47 198.6 0.4 198.2 57.9 26.3 113.8 198.0 0.184DC Florida 2,772.5 43.98 2,728.5 646.8 2,081.8 985.2 252.1 806.5 2,043.9 37.922FL Georgia 1,094.0 24.45 1,069.5 107.5 962.0 365.3 124.1 448.3 937.7 24.250GA Hawaii 162.1 3.09 159.0 24.7 134.3 64.5 24.2 45.4 134.0 0.222HI Idaho 202.2 4.27 197.9 28.9 169.0 73.8 28.5 62.7 164.9 4.027ID Illinois 1,300.8 3.42 1,297.4 215.3 1,082.1 441.2 162.3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/95socc.pdf
  • 1.05 1.10 5.62 27.1 MA MICHIGAN 233.5 115.6 117.8 97.8 20.0 (0.95) 0.10 0.28 (0.57) 20.6 MI MINNESOTA 26.2 33.6 (7.4) (7.1) (0.4) (3.00) (1.41) (1.37) (5.79) 5.4 MN MISSISSIPPI 55.2 19.4 35.8 31.2 4.6 (0.33) 0.02 (0.03) (0.34) 4.9 MS MISSOURI 181.3 132.9 48.5 36.8 11.6 (0.34) (0.62) 0.04 (0.92) 12.6 MO MONTANA (4.4) 4.8 (9.2) (7.0) (2.2) (1.77) (1.47) (0.84) (4.08) 1.8 MT NEBRASKA 138.1 31.9 106.2 80.0 26.2 8.07 6.45 6.93 21.45 4.8 NE NEVADA 98.0 57.4 40.6 31.6 9.0 (0.06) (0.26) 0.02 (0.29) 9.3 NV NEW HAMPSHIRE 33.7 4.8 28.8 22.3 6.5 0.64 0.01 0.12 0.76 5.8 NH NEW JERSEY 539.0 421.0 118.0 73.2 44.8 6.45 4.18 4.57 15.19 29.6 NJ NEW MEXICO 34.3 15.9 18.3 12.7
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/96socc.pdf
  • 0.64 1.22 1979 2.06 3.96 1.34 2.57 0.82 1.58 1.86 3.56 1.21 2.31 0.74 1.42 1.59 3.04 1.03 1.98 0.64 1.22 1980 15/ 2.17 4.17 1.41 2.71 0.87 1.67 1.97 3.77 1.28 2.45 0.79 1.51 1.65 3.15 1.07 2.05 0.66 1.26 1981 16/ 2.50 4.80 1.63 3.12 1.00 1.92 2.29 4.39 1.49 2.85 0.92 1.76 1.92 3.67 1.25 2.39 0.77 1.47 1982 17/ 2.70 5.15 1.62 3.09 1.08 2.06 2.34 4.49 1.40 2.69 0.94 1.80 2.05 3.90 1.23 2.34 0.82 1.56 1983 2.70 5.15 1.62 3.09 1.08 2.06 2.34 4.49 1.40 2.69 0.94 1.80 2.05 3.90 1.23 2.34 0.82 1.56 1984 18/ 2.53 4.83 1.52 2.90 1.01 1.93 2.18 4.18 1.31 2.51 0.87 1.67 1.94 3.69 1.16 2.21 0.78 1.48 1985
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/97socc.pdf
  • BETWEEN MEXICO AND THE U.S. MAINLAND, GUAM OR COMMONWEALTH OF NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS (CNMI). ** INCLUDING REAL TIME RATED CALLS AND ALL COLLECT CALLS. 235 STATISTICS OF COMMUNICATIONS COMMON CARRIERS TABLE 5.6-AT&T RATES FOR LONG DISTANCE MESSAGE TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE UNITED STATES-OVERSEAS DIAL STATION DIAL STATION COUNTRY STANDARD ECONOMY COUNTRY STANDARD ECONOMY ARGENTINA $2.17 $1.49ITALY $1.69 $1.20 AUSTRALIA 1.70 1.17JAMAICA 1.79 1.47 AUSTRIA 1.62 1.16JAPAN (INCLUDING OKINAWA) 1.63 1.18 BAHAMAS 1.29 1.04KOREA, REPUBLIC OF 2.04 1.43 BELGIUM 1.74 1.11NETHERLANDS 1.48 0.96 BERMUDA 1.40 1.16PAKISTAN 4.64 3.05 BRAZIL 2.07 1.51PANAMA, REPUBLIC OF 1.97 1.51 CHILE 1.96 1.54PERU 2.24 1.57 CHINA, PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF 2.92 2.26PHILIPPINES 2.44 1.64 COLOMBIA 2.09 1.53POLAND, REPUBLIC OF 1.77 1.42 COSTA RICA 1.85 1.38PORTUGAL (INCLUDING AZORES 1.85 1.20 DENMARK
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/98SOCC.PDF
  • 0.64 1.22 1979 2.06 3.96 1.34 2.57 0.82 1.58 1.86 3.56 1.21 2.31 0.74 1.42 1.59 3.04 1.03 1.98 0.64 1.22 1980 15/ 2.17 4.17 1.41 2.71 0.87 1.67 1.97 3.77 1.28 2.45 0.79 1.51 1.65 3.15 1.07 2.05 0.66 1.26 1981 16/ 2.50 4.80 1.63 3.12 1.00 1.92 2.29 4.39 1.49 2.85 0.92 1.76 1.92 3.67 1.25 2.39 0.77 1.47 1982 17/ 2.70 5.15 1.62 3.09 1.08 2.06 2.34 4.49 1.40 2.69 0.94 1.80 2.05 3.90 1.23 2.34 0.82 1.56 1983 2.70 5.15 1.62 3.09 1.08 2.06 2.34 4.49 1.40 2.69 0.94 1.80 2.05 3.90 1.23 2.34 0.82 1.56 1984 18/ 2.53 4.83 1.52 2.90 1.01 1.93 2.18 4.18 1.31 2.51 0.87 1.67 1.94 3.69 1.16 2.21 0.78 1.48 1985
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/99socc.pdf
  • 2.30 0.81 1.56 1.76 3.34 1.07 2.05 0.71 1.36 1986 AT&T 1.99 3.79 1.19 2.27 0.88 1.67 1.79 3.44 1.07 2.06 0.79 1.51 1.55 2.95 0.93 1.77 0.68 1.30 MCI 1.89 3.68 1.16 2.24 0.84 1.62 1.72 3.35 1.04 2.03 0.76 1.48 1.46 2.85 0.86 1.70 0.62 1.23 Sprint 1.88 3.67 1.15 2.23 0.83 1.61 1.71 3.34 1.03 2.02 0.75 1.47 1.45 2.84 0.85 1.68 0.61 1.22 1987 AT&T 1.58 3.08 0.98 1.91 0.74 1.45 1.50 2.95 0.93 1.83 0.71 1.39 1.23 2.38 0.76 1.48 0.58 1.12 MCI 1.53 3.02 0.96 1.89 0.71 1.42 1.46 2.90 0.90 1.80 0.69 1.37 1.17 2.32 0.71 1.43 0.55 1.09 Sprint 1.54 3.04 0.96 1.89 0.73 1.43 1.37 2.92 0.92 1.81 0.69 1.37 1.19 2.34
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Enforcement/Orders/2001/fcc01308.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Enforcement/Orders/2001/fcc01308.txt
  • other matter which may be of decisional significance in a Commission proceeding involving the pending application, the applicant shall as promptly as possible and in any event within 30 days, unless good cause is shown, submit a statement furnishing such additional or corrected information as may be appropriate, which shall be served upon parties of record in accordance with � 1.47. Where the matter is before any court for review, statements and requests to amend shall in addition be served upon the Commission's General Counsel. For the purposes of this section, an application is "pending" before the Commission from the time it is accepted for filing by the Commission until a Commission grant or denial of the application is no longer
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fcc97303.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fcc97303.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fcc97303.wp
  • by demonstrating that the facility in question does not or will not, in fact, comply with our RF guidelines.211 We believe that such a presumption would be consistent with Commission practice. Generally, we presume that licensees are in compliance with our rules unless presented with evidence to the contrary.212 In addition, 208See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.45 - 1.49. 209See Section 1.47 of the Commission's Rules concerning service of documents and proof of service. 47 C.F.R. � 1.47. 21047 U.S.C. � 332(c)(7)(B)(v). 211The Commission's RF guidelines and procedures are set forth in Sections 1.1307 of the rules. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1307. 212See Improvement of the Quality of AM Broadcast Service, MM Docket No. 88-376, First Report and Order , 4 FCC Rcd
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1999/da992453.doc
  • this upgrade and new allotment, the First Report and Order also substituted Channel 259A for Channel 232A at Jackson, and modified the Station KNGT license to specify operation on Channel 259A. 5. Gold Country filed a Petition for Reconsideration directed against the First Report and Order. However, Gold Country did not provide a proof of service as required by Section 1.47(g) of the Rules there was no indication whatsoever that the Petition for Reconsideration had been served on the other parties in the proceeding as specifically required by Section 1.106(f) of the Commission's Rules. For this reason, the Petition for Reconsideration was dismissed as procedurally defective. 6. In the Petition for Reconsideration directed against that dismissal, Gold Country contends that the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00149.doc
  • that the public interest considerations reflected in this order are relevant and may be given weight in conjunction with the handling of the television translator applications. Attached to the Motion are letters from Members of Congress and numerous citizens supporting Shenandoah's opposition to the grant of a construction permit for channel 19. Pursuant to Sections 0.251(c) and (h), 1.41, and 1.47(g) of the Rules, Shenandoah requests that the citizens' letters be placed in the record. No party to this adjudicatory proceeding will be harmed by entry of the attached letters into the record in MM Docket No. 86-440. With one exception, each of the letters was mailed to the parties in this proceeding at the time of their submission to the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00155.doc
  • petitions and will address the arguments raised in them. In addition to the petitioners to deny, a number of individuals filed letters commenting on the proceeding. Those letters have been reviewed and considered in reaching our decision here. CBS and Viacom served their oppositions on the petitioners by facsimile, relying on �1.4(h) of our rules. We wish to clarify that �1.47, not �1.4(h), governs service requirements in Commission proceedings. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.47. The reference in �1.4 as to how to treat service by facsimile or electronic mail only relates to timing issues that arise when such service is specifically authorized by our rules. It is not a blanket authorization of service by such means. In this proceeding, no party
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Notices/1997/fcc97113.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Notices/1997/fcc97113.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Notices/1997/fcc97113.wp
  • notice and comment rule making proceedings is filed less than 7 days prior to the filing day, the party filing the motion shall (in addition to serving the motion on other parties) orally notify other parties and Commission staff personnel responsible for acting on the motion that the motion has been (or is being) filed. * * * 3. Section 1.47 is amended by revising paragraph (d) to read as follows: ''1.47 Service of documents and proof of service. (d) Documents may be served upon a party, its attorney, or other duly constituted agent by delivering a copy or by mailing a copy to the last known address. When a party is represented by an attorney of record in a formal
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1998/fcc98056.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1998/fcc98056.wp
  • will determine whether a tendered document meets the pre-5:30 deadline. Documents filed electronically pursuant to � 1.49(f) of the Rules must be received by the Commission's electronic comment filing system before midnight. (h) If a document is required to be served upon other parties by statute or Commission regulation and the document is in fact served by mail (see � 1.47(f)), and the filing period for a response is 10 days or less, an additional 3 days (excluding holidays) will be allowed to all parties in the proceeding for filing a response. This paragraph (� 1.4(h)) shall not apply to documents filed pursuant to � 1.89, � 1.120(d), � 1.315(b) or � 1.316. For purposes of this paragraph service by facsimile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Comments/fcc98055/209973-1.pdf
  • in which a service provider or manufacturer should communicate a response to a 41: See id. 71 132-134; see also Implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Amendment of Rules to Be Followed When Formal Complaints Are Filed Against Common Carriers, CC Docket No. 96-238, Report and Order, FCC 97-396 (rel. Nov. 25, 1997) 00 54, 67; 47 C.F.R Ej 1.47(h). 16 customer, especially if the Commission has determined that one form of communication is preferable to another. D. Procedures For Informal And Formal Complaints Should Address The Complexity Of Section 255 Issues To minimize confusion and increase efficiency, Commission rules for formal and informal complaints under section 255 that involve LECs should not deviate from those already in place for
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.wp
  • Filing of petitions. Petitions to deny and related pleadings may be filed electronically via ULS. Manually filed petitions to deny must be filed with the Office of the Secretary, 1919 M Street, Washington, DC 20554. (c) Service. A petitioner shall serve a copy of its petition to deny on the applicant and on all other interested parties pursuant to section 1.47. Oppositions and replies shall be served on the petitioner and all other interested parties. (d) Content. A petition to deny must contain specific allegations of fact sufficient to make a prima facie showing that the petitioner is a party in interest and that a grant of the application would be inconsistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. Such allegations
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/da992116.doc
  • Communications Commission William W. Kunze Deputy Chief, Commercial Wireless Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau 47 CFR � 90.157. The assignment of WNMT733 to Doering was granted on February 13, 1996. See letter from William H. Kellett, Esq. to Lewis Goldman, Esq., dated July 5, 1996. Petition at 3. Id. Reply to Opposition to Petition for Reconsideration at 2. 47 CFR � 1.47. We note that Lewis Goldman Esq. has handled numerous finder's preference cases for other clients. 47 CFR 1.106(c) For the record, Doering filed a Notification of Station Closure with the Commission on November 26, 1996 (FCC Form 405A, signed by Jim Doering 10/31/96 requesting cancellation of the license for WNMT733). Federal Communications Commission DA 99-2116 Federal Communications Commission DA 99-XXXX
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da001604.doc
  • was submitted to the FCC within thirty days of the Public Notice announcing the grant of ADF's application, authorizing ADF to operate on the subject frequencies under call sign WPLQ307. The Revere Public Notice required the City of Revere to serve a copy of the Revere Letter on ADF, and to file proof of such service in accordance with Section 1.47(g) of the Commission's Rules, within three business days of the date of release of the Public Notice. 8. As explained in the 1999 MO&O, after receiving the Revere Letter and performing a balancing test of public interest considerations versus any procedural shortcomings on the part of the Revere Police Department, the Bureau released the Revere Public Notice, which made the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00097.doc
  • 1994) (Opposition to Petition). Id. at 2. Id. at 8. See note 2, supra. Id. at 2. Id. See note 1, supra. Id. at 3. Id. at 2 and Exhibit B. Opposition to Application for Review (filed April 1, 1997) (Opposition). Id. at 2-3. Id. Id. at 3-4 (citing 47 C.F.R. � 90.173(k)(4) (1994)). Under the provisions of Commission Rule 1.47(d), 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(d), documents may be served upon a party by delivering a copy or by mailing a copy to the last known address. 47 C.F.R. � 90.173(k)(4) (1994). See also Amendment of Parts 1 and 90 of the Commission's Rules, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 8 FCC Rcd 6690 � 29 (1993) (citing 47 C.F.R. �� 1.47 and 1.5).
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
  • % Missed Appointment � Verizon � No Dispatch 0.28 0 0.04 0 0.07 0 0.03 0 0.02 0 PR-4-08-2100 % Missed Appt. � Customer � Late Order Conf. 0 0 PR-6 - Installation Quality PR-6-01-2100 % Installation Troubles reported within 30 Days 2.59 3.37 2.31 1.06 1.98 2.14 2.27 0.64 1.87 3.55 PR-6-02-2100 % Installation Troubles reported within 7 Days 1.47 2.02 1.41 0.71 PR-6-03-2100 % Inst. Troubles reported w/ in 30 Days - FOK/TOK/CPE 2.28 0.9 2.19 1.95 1.88 0.46 0.64 1.55 PR-8 - Open Orders in a Hold Status PR-8-01-2100 Open Orders in a Hold Status > 30 Days 0.02 0 0.01 0 0.01 0 0.01 0 0 0 PR-8-02-2100 Open Orders in a Hold Status > 90 Days
• http://www.fcc.gov/Forms/Form499-A/499a-2000.pdf
  • offset your salary, IRS tax refund, or other payments to collect that debt. The Commission also may provide this information to those agencies through the matching of computer records where authorized. With the exception of your social security number, if you do not provide the information we request on the Worksheet, the Commission may consider you in violation of sections 1.47, 52.17, 52.32, 54.713, and 64.604 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.47, 52.17, 52.32, 54.713, and 64.604. The foregoing Notice is required by the Privacy Act of 1974, P.L. 93-579, December 31, 1974, 5 U.S.C. � 552(a)(e)(3), and the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, P.L. No. 104-13, 44 U.S.C. � 3501, et seq. * * * * * Table
• http://www.fcc.gov/Forms/Form499-A/499a-2001.pdf
  • offset your salary, IRS tax refund, or other payments to collect that debt. The Commission also may provide this information to those agencies through the matching of computer records where authorized. With the exception of your employer identification number, if you do not provide the information we request on the worksheet, the Commission may consider you in violation of sections 1.47, 52.17, 52.32, 54.713, and 64.604 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.47, 52.17, 52.32, 54.713, 64.604, and 64.1195. The foregoing Notice is required by the Privacy Act of 1974, P.L. 93-579, December 31, 1974, 5 U.S.C. � 552(a)(e)(3), and the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, P.L. No. 104-13, 44 U.S.C. � 3501, et seq. * * * * *
• http://www.fcc.gov/Forms/Form499-A/499a-2002.pdf
  • the Commission; or (b) any employee of the Commission; or (c) the United States government, is a party to a proceeding before the body or has an interest in the proceeding. With the exception of your employer identification number, if you do not provide the information we request on the worksheet, the Commission may consider you in violation of sections 1.47, 52.17, 52.32, 54.713, and 64.604 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.47, 52.17, 52.32, 54.713, 64.604, and 64.1195. The foregoing Notice is required by the Privacy Act of 1974, P.L. 93-579, December 31, 1974, 5 U.S.C. � 552(a)(e)(3), and the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, P.L. No. 104-13, 44 U.S.C. � 3501, et seq. * * * * *
• http://www.fcc.gov/Forms/Form499-A/499a-2003.pdf
  • the Commission; or (b) any employee of the Commission; or (c) the United States government, is a party to a proceeding before the body or has an interest in the proceeding. With the exception of your employer identification number, if you do not provide the information we request on the Worksheet, the Commission may consider you in violation of sections 1.47, 52.17, 52.32, 54.713, 64.604, and 64.1195 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.47, 52.17, 52.32, 54.713, 64.604, and 64.1195. The foregoing Notice is required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, P.L. No. 104-13, 44 U.S.C. � 3501, et seq. * * * * * Table of Contents I. Introduction 3 II. Filing Requirements and General Instructions 4 A.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Forms/Form499-A/499a-2004.pdf
  • the Commission; or (b) any employee of the Commission; or (c) the United States government, is a party to a proceeding before the body or has an interest in the proceeding. With the exception of your employer identification number, if you do not provide the information we request on the Worksheet, the Commission may consider you in violation of sections 1.47, 52.17, 52.32, 54.713, 64.604, and 64.1195 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.47, 52.17, 52.32, 54.713, 64.604, and 64.1195. The foregoing Notice is required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, P.L. No. 104-13, 44 U.S.C. � 3501, et seq. * * * * * Table of Contents I. Introduction 3 II. Filing Requirements and General Instructions 4 A.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Forms/Form499-A/499a-2006.pdf
  • the Commission; or (b) any employee of the Commission; or (c) the United States government, is a party to a proceeding before the body or has an interest in the proceeding. With the exception of your employer identification number, if you do not provide the information we request on the Worksheet, the Commission may consider you in violation of sections 1.47, 52.17, 52.32, 54.713, 64.604, and 64.1195 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.47, 52.17, 52.32, 54.713, 64.604, and 64.1195. The foregoing Notice is required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, P.L. No. 104-13, 44 U.S.C. � 3501, et seq. * * * * * Table of Contents I. Introduction 3 II. Filing Requirements and General Instructions 4 A.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Forms/Form499-A/499a-2007.pdf
  • the Commission; or (b) any employee of the Commission; or (c) the United States government, is a party to a proceeding before the body or has an interest in the proceeding. With the exception of your employer identification number, if you do not provide the information we request on the Worksheet, the Commission may consider you in violation of sections 1.47, 52.17, 52.32, 54.713, 64.604, and 64.1195 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.47, 52.17, 52.32, 54.713, 64.604, and 64.1195. The foregoing Notice is required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, P.L. No. 104-13, 44 U.S.C. � 3501, et seq. * * * * * Table of Contents I. Introduction 3 II. Filing Requirements and General Instructions 4 A.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Forms/Form499-A/499a-2008.pdf
  • the Commission; or (b) any employee of the Commission; or (c) the United States government, is a party to a proceeding before the body or has an interest in the proceeding. With the exception of your employer identification number, if you do not provide the information we request on the Worksheet, the Commission may consider you in violation of sections 1.47, 52.17, 52.32, 54.713, 64.604, and 64.1195 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.47, 52.17, 52.32, 54.713, 64.604, and 64.1195. The foregoing Notice is required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, P.L. No. 104-13, 44 U.S.C. � 3501, et seq. * * * * * Table of Contents I. Introduction 3 II. Filing Requirements and General Instructions 4 A.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Forms/Form499-A/499a-2009.pdf
  • the Commission; or (b) any employee of the Commission; or (c) the United States government, is a party to a proceeding before the body or has an interest in the proceeding. With the exception of your employer identification number, if you do not provide the information we request on the Worksheet, the Commission may consider you in violation of sections 1.47, 52.17, 52.32, 54.713, 64.604, and 64.1195 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.47, 52.17, 52.32, 54.713, 64.604, and 64.1195. The foregoing Notice is required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, P.L. No. 104-13, 44 U.S.C. � 3501, et seq. * * * * * Table of Contents I. Introduction 3 II. Filing Requirements and General Instructions 4 A.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Forms/Form499-A/499a-2010.pdf
  • the Commission; or (b) any employee of the Commission; or (c) the United States government, is a party to a proceeding before the body or has an interest in the proceeding. With the exception of your employer identification number, if you do not provide the information we request on the Worksheet, the Commission may consider you in violation of sections 1.47, 52.17, 52.32, 54.713, 64.604, and 64.1195 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.47, 52.17, 52.32, 54.713, 64.604, and 64.1195. The foregoing Notice is required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, P.L. No. 104-13, 44 U.S.C. � 3501, et seq. * * * * * Table of Contents I. Introduction 3 II. Filing Requirements and General Instructions 4 A.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Forms/Form499-A/499a-2011.pdf
  • 54.711, 64.604(b)(5)(iii)(B). 3 See 47 U.S.C. � 159(a), (b)(1)(A), (g) (authorizing the Commission to collect annual regulatory fees to recover the costs of enforcement, policy and rulemaking, user information, and international activities). 4 See 47 C.F.R. �� 52.17 (numbering administration), 52.32 (local number portability), 54.706 (universal service), 64.604 (interstate TRS). 5 47 U.S.C. � 413; see also 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h). 6 47 C.F.R. � 64.1195. 7 For this purpose, the United States is defined as the contiguous United States, Alaska, Hawaii, American Samoa, Baker Island, Guam, Howland Island, Jarvis Island, Johnston Atoll, Kingman Reef, Midway Island, Navassa Island, the Northern Mariana Islands, Palmyra, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and Wake Island. 8 Section 254(d) applies not only to "every
• http://www.fcc.gov/Forms/Form499-A/499a2-2011.pdf
  • 54.711, 64.604(b)(5)(iii)(B). 3 See 47 U.S.C. � 159(a), (b)(1)(A), (g) (authorizing the Commission to collect annual regulatory fees to recover the costs of enforcement, policy and rulemaking, user information, and international activities). 4 See 47 C.F.R. �� 52.17 (numbering administration), 52.32 (local number portability), 54.706 (universal service), 64.604 (interstate TRS). 5 47 U.S.C. � 413; see also 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h). 6 47 C.F.R. � 64.1195. 7 For this purpose, the United States is defined as the contiguous United States, Alaska, Hawaii, American Samoa, Baker Island, Guam, Howland Island, Jarvis Island, Johnston Atoll, Kingman Reef, Midway Island, Navassa Island, the Northern Mariana Islands, Palmyra, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and Wake Island. 8 Section 254(d) applies not only to "every
• http://www.fcc.gov/Forms/Form499-Q/499q.pdf
  • the Commission; or (b) any employee of the Commission; or (c) the United States government, is a party to a proceeding before the body or has an interest in the proceeding. With the exception of your employer identification number, if you do not provide the information we request on the Worksheet, the Commission may consider you in violation of sections 1.47, 52.17, 52.32, 54.713, and 64.604 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.47, 52.17, 52.32, 54.713, and 64.604. 2 The foregoing Notice is required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, P.L. No. 104-13, 44 U.S.C. �� 3501, et seq. * * * * * Table of Contents I. Introduction 3 II. Filing Requirements and General Instructions 3 A. Who
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011001.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011001.html
  • payment of the full amount of this Notice of Apparent Liability under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief, Revenue and Receivables Operations Group, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1914. Commission records indicate that Neclec, Inc. apparently has not designated an agent for service of Commission decisions, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h). Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be posted in the Office of the Secretary. In addition, a copy will be sent by Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested, to Neclec, LLC, 190 Old Derby, Suite 310, Hingham, MA 02043. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau Numbering Resource Optimization,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011002.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011002.html
  • payment of the full amount of this Notice of Apparent Liability under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief, Revenue and Receivables Operations Group, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1914. Commission records indicate that Net-Tel Corporation apparently has not designated an agent for service of Commission decisions, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h). Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be posted in the Office of the Secretary. In addition, a copy will be sent by Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested, to Net-Tel Corporation, 1023 31st Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20007. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau Numbering Resource Optimization, Report
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011004.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011004.html
  • the full amount of this Notice of Apparent Liability under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief, Revenue and Receivables Operations Group, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1914. Commission records indicate that North American Telecommunications Corporation apparently has not designated an agent for service of Commission decisions, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h). Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be posted in the Office of the Secretary. In addition, a copy will be sent by Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested, to North American Telecommunications Corporation, 875 Merrick Ave., Westbury, NY 11590. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau Numbering Resource Optimization,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011005.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011005.html
  • the full amount of this Notice of Apparent Liability under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief, Revenue and Receivables Operations Group, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1914. Commission records indicate that North County Communications Corp. apparently has not designated an agent for service of Commission decisions, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h). Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be posted in the Office of the Secretary. In addition, a copy will be sent by Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested, to North County Communications Corp., 3802 Rosecrans #485, San Diego, CA 92110. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau Numbering Resource
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011006.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011006.html
  • the full amount of this Notice of Apparent Liability under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief, Revenue and Receivables Operations Group, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1914. Commission records indicate that Optel Texas Telecom, Inc. apparently has not designated an agent for service of Commission decisions, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h). Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be posted in the Office of the Secretary. In addition, a copy will be sent by Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested, to Optel Texas Telecom, Inc., 1111 W. Mockingbird Lane, Suite 1000, Dallas, TX 75247. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011007.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011007.html
  • the full amount of this Notice of Apparent Liability under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief, Revenue and Receivables Operations Group, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1914. Commission records indicate that Paging Source USA, LLC apparently has not designated an agent for service of Commission decisions, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h). Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be posted in the Office of the Secretary. In addition, a copy will be sent by Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested, to Paging Source USA LLC, 240-19 Jamaica Ave, Bellerose, NY 11426. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau Numbering Resource Optimization,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011008.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011008.html
  • full amount of this Notice of Apparent Liability under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief, Revenue and Receivables Operations Group, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1914. Commission records indicate that R and G Distributors, Inc. apparently has not designated an agent for service of Commission decisions, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h). Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be posted in the Office of the Secretary. In addition, a copy will be sent by Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested, to R and G Distributors, Inc., 1665 W. 68th Street, Suite 201, Hialeah, FL 33014 and to its agent registered with the Secretary
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011009.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011009.html
  • of the full amount of this Notice of Apparent Liability under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief, Revenue and Receivables Operations Group, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1914. Commission records indicate that Trivergent Communications, Inc. apparently has not designated an agent for service of Commission decisions, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h). Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be posted in the Office of the Secretary. In addition, a copy will be sent by Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested, to Trivergent Communications, Inc., 301 N. Main Street, Suite 5000, Greenville, SC 29601. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau Numbering
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011011.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011011.html
  • the full amount of this Notice of Apparent Liability under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief, Revenue and Receivables Operations Group, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1914. Commission records indicate that Vanguard Cellular Systems, Inc. apparently has not designated an agent for service of Commission decisions, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h). Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be posted in the Office of the Secretary. In addition, a copy will be sent by Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested, to Vanguard Cellular Systems, Inc., 7277 164th Ave. N.E., Redmond, WA 98052. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau Numbering Resource
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011012.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011012.html
  • of the full amount of this Notice of Apparent Liability under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief, Revenue and Receivables Operations Group, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1914. Commission records indicate that Winsome Paging, Inc. apparently has not designated an agent for service of Commission decisions, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h). Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be posted in the Office of the Secretary. In addition, a copy will be sent by Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested, to Winsome Paging, Inc., 429 Broadway, Bayonne, NJ 07002. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau Numbering Resource Optimization, Report and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011044.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011044.html
  • determining the exact number of public and semi-public payphones may be difficult. We therefore encourage the parties to consider proxies that can be used to obtain a reasonable estimation of that number. Bureau Participation The Enforcement Bureau shall be a party to the proceeding and will determine its level of participation, as appropriate, on an issue-by-issue basis. Pursuant to section 1.47(c) of the Commission's rules, the Bureau shall be served with documents in the same manner as other parties. damages instructions Measure of Damages The scope of the hearing is limited to determining the proper amount of damages to which Complainants are entitled. The measure of damages is the amount of EUCL payments Defendants assessed and collected from the Complainants for
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01991.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01991.html
  • payment of the full amount of this Notice of Apparent Liability under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief, Revenue and Receivables Operations Group, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1914. Commission records indicate that Allpage, Inc. apparently has not designated an agent for service of Commission decisions, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h). Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be posted in the Office of the Secretary. In addition, a copy will be sent by Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested, to Allpage, Inc., P.O. Box 161184, Mobile, AL 36616. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau Numbering Resource Optimization, Report and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01992.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01992.html
  • of the full amount of this Notice of Apparent Liability under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief, Revenue and Receivables Operations Group, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1914. Commission records indicate that American Metrocomm Corp. apparently has not designated an agent for service of Commission decisions, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h). Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be posted in the Office of the Secretary. In addition, a copy will be sent by Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested, to American Metrocomm Corp., 1615 Poydras Street, New Orleans, LA 70112. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau Numbering Resource Optimization,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01994.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01994.html
  • of the full amount of this Notice of Apparent Liability under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief, Revenue and Receivables Operations Group, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1914. Commission records indicate that CDS Networks, Inc. apparently has not designated an agent for service of Commission decisions, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h). Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be posted in the Office of the Secretary. In addition, a copy will be sent by Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested, to CDS Networks, Inc., 2661 S. Pacific Highway, Medford, OR 97502 and to its agent registered with the Secretary of State of Oregon,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01996.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01996.html
  • of the full amount of this Notice of Apparent Liability under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief, Revenue and Receivables Operations Group, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1914. Commission records indicate that Core Communications, Inc. apparently has not designated an agent for service of Commission decisions, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h). Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be posted in the Office of the Secretary. In addition, a copy will be sent by Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested, to Core Communications, Inc., 209 West Street, Suite 302, Annapolis, MD 21401. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau Numbering Resource
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01997.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01997.html
  • of the full amount of this Notice of Apparent Liability under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief, Revenue and Receivables Operations Group, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1914. Commission records indicate that Digital Teleport, Inc. apparently has not designated an agent for service of Commission decisions, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h). Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be posted in the Office of the Secretary. In addition, a copy will be sent by Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested, to Digital Teleport Inc., 8112 Maryland Ave., 4th Floor, St. Louis, MO 63105. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau Numbering
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01998.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01998.html
  • payment of the full amount of this Notice of Apparent Liability under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief, Revenue and Receivables Operations Group, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1914. Commission records indicate that Fulltel, Inc. apparently has not designated an agent for service of Commission decisions, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h). Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be posted in the Office of the Secretary. In addition, a copy will be sent by Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested, to Fulltel, Inc., 210 Robert S. Kerr, Oklahoma City, OK 73102. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau Numbering Resource Optimization,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01999.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01999.html
  • for payment of the full amount of this Notice of Apparent Liability under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief, Revenue and Receivables Operations Group, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1914. Commission records indicate that IDS apparently has not designated an agent for service of Commission decisions, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(h). Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be posted in the Office of the Secretary. In addition, a copy will be sent by Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested, to IDS Long Distance, 1525 N.W. 167th Street, Suite 200, Miami, FL 33169. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau Numbering
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01282.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01282.html
  • to Petitioners' Emergency Motion for Stay, Mpower Comm. Corp. et al v. FCC, No. 01-1280 (D.C. Cir. filed Jun. 26, 2001) at 8 n.8, Petitioners' counsel improperly failed to serve the parties (or Commission counsel) on the same day that they submitted the Petition to the Commission, and failed to include a proper proof of service. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.47(b), (c), (g), 1.106(f), 1.735(f); Letter from Anthony J. DeLaurentis, Attorney, Market Disputes Resolution Division, Enforcement Bureau, to James F. Bendernagel, Counsel for AT&T, Jonathan E. Canis, Counsel for BTI, and Cheryl A. Tritt, Counsel for Sprint, File Nos. EB-01-MD-001, 002 (Jan. 18, 2001). Because Petitioners submitted the Petition to the Commission Secretary on the last day for filing permitted by
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01308.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01308.pdf
  • any other matter which may be of decisional significance in a Commission proceeding involving the pending application, the applicant shall as promptly as possible and in any event within 30 days, unless good cause is shown, submit a statement furnishing such additional or corrected information as may be appropriate, which shall be served upon parties of record in accordance with 1.47. Where the matter is before any court for review, statements and requests to amend shall in addition be served upon the Commission's General Counsel. For the purposes of this section, an application is ``pending'' before the Commission from the time it is accepted for filing by the Commission until a Commission grant or denial of the application is no longer
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-153A1.html
  • any other matter which may be of decisional significance in a Commission proceeding involving the pending application, the applicant shall as promptly as possible and in any event within 30 days, unless good cause is shown, submit a statement furnishing such additional or corrected information as may be appropriate, which shall be served upon parties of record in accordance with 1.47. . . For the purposes of this section, an application is ``pending'' before the Commission from the time it is accepted for filing by the Commission until a Commission grant or denial of the application is no longer subject to reconsideration by the Commission or to review by any court. 18 See, e.g., 47 U.S.C. 503(b). 19 See Loop Qualification
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-3048A1.html
  • with respect to the Petition,25 it bears the burden of proceeding with the introduction of evidence and the burden of proving it is entitled to compensation above marginal cost with respect to specific poles.26 III.D. Bureau Participation 9. The Enforcement Bureau shall be a party to the proceeding and will determine its level of participation, as appropriate. Pursuant to section 1.47(c) of the Commission's rules,27 the Bureau shall be served with documents in the same manner as other parties. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES 10. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 224, and 405 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i), 154(j), 224, 405, and sections 0.111, 0.311, 1.106, and 1.1411 of the Commission's
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1889A1.html
  • 5771, 12. 9 Id. 10 FCC 05M-13 (rel. Mar. 17, 2005). 11 See.Judge's Ex. 2. 12 Id. at 1-2. 13 Id. at 4. 14 See Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 05M-16 (rel. Mar. 30, 2005) (``MO&O''). 15 Specifically, the MO&O concluded that the Show Cause Reply and its submission to the Presiding Judge were in violation of sections 0.401, 1.7, 1.47, 1.51(a)(1), 1.52, 1.209, 1.211, 1.291(a)(4), and 1.296 of the Commission's Rules. Id. at 2, 4. 16 Id. 17 Id. at 2, 5. 18 Id. at 2, n.2. 19 Id. at 3. 20 See Judge's Ex. 3. 21 Id. at 1. As noted above, the Media Bureau canceled the license for Station K216EQ on May 9, 2005. 22 See Dismissal Order,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-494A1.html
  • of Section 224(f)(1) and (2) of the Act, and Entergy shall have the burden of proving that the denial was lawful, once a prima facie case is established by the Complainants. A. Bureau Participation 22. The Enforcement Bureau shall be a party to the hearing before the ALJ and will determine its level of participation, as appropriate. Pursuant to section 1.47(c) of the Commission's rules, the Bureau shall be served with documents in the same manner as other parties. VI. ORDERING CLAUSES 23. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), and 224 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. SS 151, 154(i), 154(j), and 224, and sections 0.111, 0.311, 1.1411, and 1.1415 of the Commission's
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-14A1.html
  • service problem alleged here by NetworkIP, LLC. Thus, Network cannot complain about the Commission's attempts to work around NetworkIP LLC's rule violation and provide Network actual notice of the informal complaint. Moreover, especially in light of the absence of a registered agent, the address used to serve the March 2002 Informal Complaint qualifies as the "last known address" under rule 1.47(d), because (i) the individual addressee, Doug Williams, worked for a closely related affiliate of NetworkIP, LLC; (ii) the business addressee, "Network IP, Inc.", is so close to "NetworkIP, LLC" that any reasonable person would have suspected that NetworkIP, LLC was the intended recipient; (iii) though not of NetworkIP's headquarters, the address used was of a NetworkIP, LLC office containing collocation
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-1546A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-1546A1.pdf
  • Commission should withhold making a decision on the Application ``until the LIM informal objection and all other issues of the informal objection are resolved by the FCC.'' Discussion. Procedural Matter. In the Opposition, LIM and NYStar claim that the Objection was not timely because it was served after it had been filed and contained no proof of service. Under Section 1.47(b) of the Rules, ``service shall be made ... on or before the day on which the document is filed.'' The Objection was filed with the Commission on May 12, 2006. LIM was served the Objection via mail on May 20, 2006, and received it on May 22, 2006. Though the Objection should have been served on or before May 12,
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-1549A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-1549A1.pdf
  • is styled as a petition to deny, Alex has failed to provide an affidavit to support any allegations of fact as required by Section 309(d)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (``Act''). Additionally, Alex failed to serve a copy of the pleading on the applicant or its counsel, as required by Section 309(d)(1) of the Act and Section 1.47 of the Commission's Rules. Accordingly, Alex's petition to deny is procedurally defective and must be dismissed. We will, however, treat the petition as an informal objection pursuant to Section 73.3587 of the Commission's Rules. Substantive Matters. In evaluating an application for license renewal, the Commission's decision is governed by Section 309(k) of the Act. That section provides that we are
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-2087A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-2087A1.pdf
  • and finding that the public interest, convenience, and necessity would be served thereby, the application for renewal of license for station WJAB(FM), Huntsville, Alabama, (File No. BRED-20031204AJF) IS GRANTED. Sincerely, Peter H. Doyle Chief, Audio Division Media Bureau cc: Alabama A & M University WJAB(FM) filed an opposition on November 11, 2004. 47 U.S.C. � 309(d)(1). Id.; 47 C.F.R. � 1.47. Williams' failure to serve a copy of the pleading did not violate the Commission's ex parte rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200 et seq., because Williams is exempt as a listener pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(8). The opposition states that the applicant received a copy of the pleading from Commission staff after inquiring about the status of its renewal application.
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1550A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1550A1.pdf
  • Struhar has failed to provide an affidavit to support any of the allegations of fact that he has made, as required by Section 309(d)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the "Act"). Additionally, Struhar failed to serve a copy of his pleadings on the Licensee or its counsel, as required by Section 309(d)(1) of the Act and Section 1.47 of the Rules. Accordingly, we will treat these and the other Objections collectively as an informal objection pursuant to Section 73.3587 of the Rules. Substantive Matters. In evaluating an application for license renewal, the Commission's decision is governed by Section 309(k)(1) of the Act. That section provides that the Commission is to grant a license renewal application if, upon consideration
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2033A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-2033A1.pdf
  • Discussion. Procedural Issues. Miller's pleading is procedurally defective. Miller fails to provide an affidavit to support the allegations raised within her pleading, as required by Section 309(d)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''). Additionally, Miller's failure to properly serve the pleading on either the licensee or its counsel violates Section 309(d)(1) of the Act, and Section 1.47 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''). Accordingly, we will dismiss Miller's pleading as a petition to deny. We will, however, treat the pleading as an informal objection pursuant to Section 73.3587 of the Rules. Substantive Issues. As noted, Simpson is President and majority shareholder of Farm and Home. Miller has failed to provide documentation demonstrating that Simpson lacks authority to
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1037A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-1037A1.pdf
  • are without merit. Discussion. Procedural Issue. Hensley's November Objection is procedurally defective as a petition to deny. Hensley failed to provide an affidavit to support his factual allegations, as required by Section 309(d)(1) of the Act. Additionally, Hensley failed to properly serve this pleading on the Respondents or their counsel, as required by Section 309(d)(1) of the Act and Section 1.47 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''). Hensley attempted to correct these defects in his December Objection, but that pleading was not filed within the 30-day period for filing petitions to deny established by the Public Notice announcing the acceptance of the Application. Accordingly, we will dismiss Hensley's pleadings as petitions to deny. We will, however, treat the pleadings as informal
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-2A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-2A1.pdf
  • in that particular regression specification in table 13 is being driven by listener behavior in markets that are outside of the full-service commercial FM stations home territory. Table 15 Effect of LPFM Entry on the Ratings of Full-Service Commercial FM Stations in Home Radio Markets Independent Variable Contour Measure Market Measure Contour/Market Measure Number of LPFM stations 0.000 (0.03) 0.007 (1.47) 0.004 (0.74) Number of AM stations in market -0.004 (0.97) -0.003 (0.85) -0.004 (0.90) Number of AM stations in contour -0.001 (0.12) -0.001 (0.09) -0.001 (0.13) Number of FM stations in market 0.001 (0.35) 0.001 (0.30) 0.001 (0.39) Number of FM stations in contour -0.007 (1.63) -0.007 (1.68) -0.007 (1.69) Number of commercial TV stations -0.003 (0.29) -0.005 (0.48) -0.004
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files/ITRND01.pdf
  • Billed to Revenues of from Billed to Revenues from Revenues Minutes RevenuesForeign Minutes Foreign RevenuesForeign Foreign for all U.S. 4/ Carriers Carriers 6/ Carriers Carriers and Foreign Minutes 1964 20.2 $62.9 $30.3 $32.6 12.0 $19.6 $3.11 $1.50 $1.62 $1.63 $1.62 1965 25.5 78.2 37.2 41.1 15.4 24.7 3.07 1.46 1.61 1.60 1.61 1966 32.3 100.1 47.6 52.5 18.9 30.1 3.10 1.47 1.63 1.59 1.61 1967 39.7 114.2 54.6 59.6 23.4 31.8 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46.4 126.9 61.5 65.4 28.2 40.0 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 64.6 172.0 82.7 89.4 38.3 51.6 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81.1 196.6 98.9 97.7 51.0 59.8 2.43 1.22 1.21 1.17 1.19 1971 100.9 237.4 120.7 116.6 68.4 75.1 2.35 1.20
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/engineering/76print.html
  • the complaint with prejudice.

    
    [TOP]
    76.956 Cable operator response.
    

    (a) Unless otherwise directed by the local franchising authority, a cable operator must file with the local franchise authority a response to the complaint. The response shall indicate when the cable operator received notice of the complaint. Service by mail is complete upon mailing. See 1.47(f) of this chapter. The response shall include the information required by the appropriate FCC form, including rate cards, channel line-ups, and an explanation of any discrepancy in the figures provided in these documents and the rate filing. The cable operator must file its response with the local franchise authority via first class mail.

    (b) The burden shall be on the

• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/engineering/part76.pdf
  • will result in dismissal of the complaint with prejudice. � 76.956 Cable operator response. top (a) Unless otherwise directed by the local franchising authority, a cable operator must file with the local franchise authority a response to the complaint. The response shall indicate when the cable operator received notice of the complaint. Service by mail is complete upon mailing. See �1.47(f) of this chapter. The response shall include the information required by the appropriate FCC form, including rate cards, channel line-ups, and an explanation of any discrepancy in the figures provided in these documents and the rate filing. The cable operator must file its response with the local franchise authority via first class mail. (b) The burden shall be on the
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/peer_review/prlpfm_rpt_economic_study.pdf
  • in that particular regression specification in table 13 is being driven by listener behavior in markets that are outside of the full-service commercial FM stations home territory. Table 15 Effect of LPFM Entry on the Ratings of Full-Service Commercial FM Stations in Home Radio Markets Independent Variable Contour Measure Market Measure Contour/Market Measure Number of LPFM stations 0.000 (0.03) 0.007 (1.47) 0.004 (0.74) Number of AM stations in market -0.004 (0.97) -0.003 (0.85) -0.004 (0.90) Numberof AM stations in contour -0.001 (0.12) -0.001 (0.09) -0.001 (0.13) Number of FM stations in market 0.001 (0.35) 0.001 (0.30) 0.001 (0.39) Number of FM stations in contour -0.007 (1.63) -0.007 (1.68) -0.007 (1.69) Number of commercial TV stations -0.003 (0.29) -0.005 (0.48) -0.004 (0.38)
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/peer_review/prrespstudy4c.pdf
  • Format Prior Period 6.59*** 0.00 727.49 6.59*** 0.000 725.18 AM Station 1.81*** 0.00 6.10 1.85*** 0.000 6.35 Crossowned With Newspaper 1.46** 0.04 4.29 1.43** 0.041 4.16 Crossowned With TV Station 0.79*** 0.00 2.20 0.79*** 0.000 2.21 Commercial Station -1.45*** 0.00 0.24 -1.50*** 0.000 0.22 Local Marketing Agreement -0.42 0.15 0.66 -0.39 0.182 0.67 Sibling News Station in Market 0.39*** 0.01 1.47 0.41*** 0.007 1.51 Owner in Same State 0.24* 0.06 1.27 0.23* 0.078 1.26 Parent Stations in Market 0.04 0.16 1.04 0.05 0.138 1.05 Broadband Lines per Person -6.21 0.360 0.00 Year 2002 -0.13 0.41 0.88 -0.77 0.260 0.46 Year 2003 -0.11 0.49 0.90 -0.57 0.259 0.56 Year 2004 0.09 0.59 1.09 -0.17 0.583 0.84 % News Stats in Mkt Previous
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/materials/already-released/empirical120003.pdf
  • concentrated gender groups7. Examining our vector of content characteristics, we find that sitcoms and programs with characters aged 18-34 receive premia from advertisers, while news programs, Table 3 Determinants of Expected Advertising Price: The Full Model Regression Coefficients and Goodness of Fit Statistics (t-statistics in parentheses) Variable Estimated Coefficient t Statistic Log (Expected Share) 1.39*** (9.38) Log (Total Viewers) 0.05 (1.47) Percentage Upper-Income 0.01** (2.55) Percentage 18-34 -0.00 (0.02) Gender Concentration 0.01* (1.88) Sitcom 0.20** (2.52) News -0.26*** (3.81) Police -0.26*** (3.10) Genx 0.16** (2.06) Ethnic 0.08 (0.46) Teens or Children -0.12* (1.76) Sports 0.09 (1.01) Late 0.13* (1.97) Constant 7.01*** (22.27) Observations 71 Adjusted R-Squared .83 F-Statistic 27.74*** *** - significant at 99% confidence level, ** - significant at 95%
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/aol-tw_rc051100.pdf
  • consider changes in its rules."). 123 Several of these comments were not properly served on AOL and Time Warner as required under the Commission's rules. Because commenters American Cable Association; Memphis Networx, LLC; Memphis Light, Gas and Water Division; iCast; and Tribal Voice failed to serve the Applicants, their submissions must be treated as informal objections. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.47(a), (e); 76.7(b)(1). The few other informal objections, submitted to the Commission via e-mail by certain consumers and one municipality, are likewise not merger specific (and generally raise claims already addressed herein). 46 unauthorized access to its IM servers.124 These two IM competitors, which have sought such unauthorized access, now wish to entangle the FCC in a matter that remains the
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/nextel-motorola/da010947.doc
  • developing a fuller factual record. We therefore exercise our discretionary authority to consider all of the information submitted in this proceeding. Southern further asserts that Nextel's service of its March 8 submission was improper because Nextel served only Southern's in-house counsel, and not its outside counsel concurrently. We find that Nextel's service complies with our rules. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(d). Finally, each of the parties has had ample opportunity to respond to the pleadings, and therefore has not been prejudiced. Accordingly, the three motions are denied. We note that our approval of this transaction is consistent with the position of U.S. Department of Justice (``DOJ''), which has not challenged Nextel's proposed acquisition of Motorola's licenses. 47 U.S.C. � 310(d). Section
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/filing.html
  • Forms 492 and 492A Rate of Return * [26]FCC Form 499-A Telecommunications Reporting Worksheet [FCC Form 499-A replaced FCC Forms 431, 457, 487, and 496; and satisfies carriers agent for service of process and registration requirements.] * [27]FCC Form 499-Q Telecommunications Reporting Worksheet [FCC Form 499-Q replaced FCC Form 499-S.] * [28]FCC Form 502 Numbering Resource Utilization/Forecast (NRUF) * [29]Section 1.47(h) Designation of Agent for Service of Process * [30]Section 1.8001 Commission Registration System (CORES) * [31]Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS) [ARMIS Reports 43-01 through 43-08 and ARMIS Reports 495-A and 495-B.] * [32]Section 43.21(c) Letter [Formerly Form P.] * [33]Interstate Service Tariff * [34]Section 64.709 Interstate Service INFORMATIONAL Tariff Requirement * [35]Section 64.1195 Carrier Registration Requirement * [36]Section 64.1900