FCC Web Documents citing 1.49

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1065A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1065A1.pdf
  • Dismiss because the Motion does not comply with certain procedural rules. MAP Opposition to Motion to Dismiss at 2, �� 1-2. Specifically, MAP asserts that the Motion fails to include proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.727(b), and to include a table of contents and summary, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.49. As to the latter, we decline to dismiss the Motion at this stage of the proceeding for such minor noncompliance with the rules. As to the former, we note that Defendants did provide, in compliance with 47 C.F.R. � 1.727(c), a proposed order that incorporates its proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law. We decline to dismiss the Motion
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-967A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-967A1.pdf
  • 1 Order''). Id. at � � 10, 15. Id. at � 10. Id. at � 15. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.720-1.736. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1401-1.1418. Note that these new rules do not affect existing section 208 formal complaints or existing section 224 pole attachment complaints. They also do not concern carrier-to-carrier informal complaints. See Id. at Appendix A, (listing new rule �1.49(f)(1)(i) that requires ``[f]ormal complaint proceedings under Section 208 . . . '' to be filed electronically and excluding informal complaints from that rule). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 ��PNG r v ��"r�9 I'6� �d�Y�͆aX ���; Wh� �X,�aX���y�]\\.W`h���va6l! �v"]�V�at�������-``````�"m(c)x<��G�<���={-N��J%t�<== �"""x ҍ� � ��(c)���!��'' �R)&�
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-361A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-361A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-361A1.txt
  • S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. Comments and reply comments will be available for public inspection during regular business hours in the FCC Reference Center, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with section 1.49, 47 C.F.R. � 1.49, and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. We also direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, regardless of the length of their submission. D.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1405A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1405A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1405A1.txt
  • reconsideration submitted to the Bureau office is not properly filed). 47 C.F.R. � 1.51(c)(2) (designating number of copies to be filed). Id. at � 1.51(c)(2) (requiring that a party not represented by an attorney ``sign and verify the document and state his address''). Id. at � 1.106(i) (``[p]etitions for reconsideration . . . shall conform to the requirements of �� 1.49, 1.51, and 1.52'') (emphasis added). See, e.g., In re 929 MHz Paging Licenses, Motions for Reconsideration of Waiver Requests of Construction Period, Order on Reconsideration, 14 FCC Rcd 9738 (CWD 1999); In re 929 and 931 MHz Paging Licenses, Motions for Reconsideration of Waiver Requests of Construction Period, Order on Reconsideration, 14 FCC Rcd 18,723 (CWD 1999); In re 800
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1415A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1415A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1415A1.txt
  • reconsideration submitted to the Bureau office is not properly filed). 47 C.F.R. � 1.51(c)(2) (designating number of copies to be filed). Id. at � 1.51(c)(2) (requiring that a party not represented by an attorney ``sign and verify the document and state his address''). Id. at � 1.106(i) (``[p]etitions for reconsideration . . . shall conform to the requirements of �� 1.49, 1.51, and 1.52'') (emphasis added). See, e.g., In re 929 MHz Paging Licenses, Motions for Reconsideration of Waiver Requests of Construction Period, Order on Reconsideration, 14 FCC Rcd 9738 (CWD 1999); In re 929 and 931 MHz Paging Licenses, Motions for Reconsideration of Waiver Requests of Construction Period, Order on Reconsideration, 14 FCC Rcd 18,723 (CWD 1999); In re 800
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1415A1_Erratum.doc
  • reconsideration submitted to the Bureau office is not properly filed). 47 C.F.R. � 1.51(c)(2) (designating number of copies to be filed). Id. at � 1.51(c)(2) (requiring that a party not represented by an attorney ``sign and verify the document and state his address''). Id. at � 1.106(i) (``[p]etitions for reconsideration . . . shall conform to the requirements of �� 1.49, 1.51, and 1.52'') (emphasis added). See, e.g., In re 929 MHz Paging Licenses, Motions for Reconsideration of Waiver Requests of Construction Period, Order on Reconsideration, 14 FCC Rcd 9738 (CWD 1999); In re 929 and 931 MHz Paging Licenses, Motions for Reconsideration of Waiver Requests of Construction Period, Order on Reconsideration, 14 FCC Rcd 18,723 (CWD 1999); In re 800
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1416A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1416A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1416A1.txt
  • 1.115(d). Id. at � 1.51(a)(2) (designating number of copies to be filed for matters to be acted on by the Commission). Id. at � 1.52 (requiring that a party not represented by an attorney ``sign and verify the document and state his address''). Id. at �� 1.106(i) (``[p]etitions for reconsideration . . . shall conform to the requirements of �� 1.49, 1.51, and 1.52'') (emphasis added), 1.115(f) (``[a]pplications for review . . . shall conform to the requirements of �� 1.49, 1.51, and 1.52'') (emphasis added). We note that the Commission has addressed all of the various Goodman/Chan-related issues in several orders relating to the numerous previous requests for relief filed in the Goodman/Chan and related cases. See, e.g., Goodman/Chan Order,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1416A1_Erratum.doc
  • 1.115(d). Id. at � 1.51(a)(2) (designating number of copies to be filed for matters to be acted on by the Commission). Id. at � 1.52 (requiring that a party not represented by an attorney ``sign and verify the document and state his address''). Id. at �� 1.106(i) (``[p]etitions for reconsideration . . . shall conform to the requirements of �� 1.49, 1.51, and 1.52'') (emphasis added), 1.115(f) (``[a]pplications for review . . . shall conform to the requirements of �� 1.49, 1.51, and 1.52'') (emphasis added). We note that the Commission has addressed all of the various Goodman/Chan-related issues in several orders relating to the numerous previous requests for relief filed in the Goodman/Chan and related cases. See, e.g., Goodman/Chan Order,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1632A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1632A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1632A1.txt
  • Unified Policy for Reviewing License Applications and Pleadings, Public Notice, 14 FCC Rcd 11,182, 11,187-88 (Wireless Tel. Bur. 1999). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.106. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(b). We note also that petitioner failed to file four copies of its pleading (47 C.F.R. � 1.51), and that it was not otherwise in proper form. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.49. POCC claims that the petition was faxed on June 22, 1999, but staff of the Enforcement Division did not receive a fax of the petition until August 5, 1999. AT&T and Sprint state that they did not receive a copy of the petition until August 8, 1999. Joint Opposition at 2. POCC petition at 1. Id. at Attachment 1, letter
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-87A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-87A5.txt
  • 1.81 n/a n/a 1.81 n/a n/a 2.59 n/a Italy 1.54 1.51 1.00 2.52 2.47 1.60 n/a n/a 2.30 Ireland n/a 2.20 1.00 n/a 4.15 1.60 n/a 5.18 2.26 Luxembourg n/a 2.01 2.25 n/a 2.01 2.25 n/a 2.01 2.25 Netherlands 2.00 1.17 1.00 2.00 1.60 1.41 2.52 2.06 1.70 Portugal n/a 1.20 0.99 n/a 2.37 1.63 n/a 18.00 2.58 Spain 1.51 1.49 0.99 1.51 1.49 1.59 4.22 4.17 3.07 Sweden 1.68 1.14 0.86 2.15 1.77 1.16 2.98 2.41 1.59 U.K. 0.64 0.61 0.62 0.91 0.87 0.90 1.74 1.69 1.27 Attachment 4 EU interconnection rates U.S. Cents per minute at peak rates Local Single Transit Double Transit 1997 1998 1999 1997 1998 1999 1997 1998 1999 Country Austria 8.36 2.00 1.91 8.36 2.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1497A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1497A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1497A1.txt
  • (a) informal requests for Commission action in application and licensing matters pertaining to Wireless Radio Services, see 47 C.F.R. � 1.41; (b) pleadings associated with licenses, applications, waivers and other documents in the Wireless Radio Services, see 47 C.F.R. � 1.45; (c) petitions, pleadings, and other documents associated with licensing matters in the Wireless Radio Services, see 47 C.F.R. � 1.49(e); (d) pleadings, briefs or other documents for application and licensing matters involving the Wireless Radio Services, see 47 C.F.R. � 1.51(f); (e) petitions for reconsideration of licensing actions, as well as oppositions and replies thereto, that are filed with respect to Wireless Radio Services, see 47 C.F.R. � 1.106(o); (f) petitions to deny and other related pleadings filed in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1760A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1760A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1760A1.txt
  • FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William H. Johnson Deputy Chief Cable Services Bureau See In the Matter of Century Cable TV, 10 FCC Rcd 1710 (1995). See Letter dated February 2, 1995 from Mr. Ken Simmons, Assistant City Manager, City of Redondo Beach to the Federal Communications Commission. Although this letter format does not conform to the requirements of 47 C.F.R. �� 1.49, 1.51 and 1.52, we will address the merits of the LFA's letter as a petition for reconsideration. Communications Act, Section 623(c), as amended, 47 U.S.C. �543(c) (1996). Pub. L. No. 102-385, 106 Stat. 1460 (1992). See Section 76.956 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �76.956. Id. See Section 76.957 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 76.957. Implementation of Sections
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2117A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2117A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2117A1.txt
  • the net weekly circulation share statistics fall below the required minimum for significantly viewed status. Accordingly, the submitted audience surveys for WABC-TV are sufficient to show that it no longer attains the viewing levels needed to demonstrate significantly viewed status in the community of New Haven. For WWOR-TV the shares for the first year, with the standard errors included, were 1.49 percent of total weekly viewing hours and a 7.83 percent net weekly circulation, and for the second year, with the standard errors included, shares of 0.20 percent and 14.63 percent, respectively. For WWOR-TV for both years, the share of total weekly viewing hours falls below the required minimum for significantly viewed status while the net weekly circulation shares exceed the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2482A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2482A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2482A1.txt
  • represent that after closing of the transaction, certain Class A shares of SES Global will be held as follows: Class A Shareholder Economic Interest (%) Voting Interest (%) Voting Power (%) Dresdner Bank Luxembourg S.A. 3.07 2.46 2.57 Deutsche Bank Luxembourg S.A. 2.68 2.14 2.24 Luxempart S.A. 2.27 1.81 1.90 TITA S.A. 2.03 1.62 1.70 Loran Telecommunications S.A. 1.78 1.42 1.49 Trufidee S.A. 1.70 1.36 1.42 Compagnie de Financement C.E.F. 1.70 1.36 1.42 Audiolux S.A. 1.34 1.07 1.12 Aachener & M�nchener BG AG 1.34 1.07 1.12 Banque G�n�rale du Luxembourg S.A. 1.05 0.84 0.88 Space Equipment S.A. 0.74 0.59 0.62 BGL Investment Partners S.A. 0.59 0.47 0.50 Other A Shareholders (57 unnamed individuals and companies) 0.35 0.28 0.29 Fiduciary Depositary Receipts
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-734A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-734A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-734A1.txt
  • section 271 statutory requirements for a given state, the BOC may incorporate by reference its prior showing for those aspects, provided that it certifies in the subsequent application that its actions and performance at that time are consistent with the prior showing. See, e.g., Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3969, para. 53. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.49, 1.741-1.749. See id. at � 1.49. Item (e) is obviously the core portion of the Brief in Support, and may be quite lengthy. It may help to divide it, therefore, into three subsections, one corresponding to each of the three requirements set forth in section 271(d)(3). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.743. See Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-788A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-788A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-788A1.txt
  • Report and Order''). See ``Auction of Licenses for the 747-762 and 777-792 MHz Bands Postponed Until September 12, 2001,'' Public Notice, Report No. AUC-01-31-A, DA 01-266 (rel. Jan. 31, 2001). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (suspension, amendment, and waiver of Commission Rules). See also 5 U.S.C. � 553(b)(3)(B). See, e.g., 47 U.S.C. �� 309(j), 337. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. �� 1.49, 1.429. See, e.g., 47 U.S.C. �� 303, 309(j), 337. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). See id. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.419(c). - PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202 / 418-2830 TTY 202 / 418-2555 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov B J
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-819A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-819A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-819A1.txt
  • for Reconsideration . . . shall be submitted to the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, D.C., 20554'') (emphasis added). Id. at � 1.7 (``[P]leadings and other documents are considered to be filed with the Commission upon their receipt at the location designated by the Commission"). In addition, as further required by section 1.106(i), Edmark's Petition does not comply with sections 1.49(a), 1.51(c)(2), and 1.52 of the Commission's rules. Id. at � 1.106(i) (``Petitions for Reconsideration . . . shall conform to the requirements of �� 1.49, 1.51, and 1.52'') (emphasis added); � 1.49(a) (requiring all pleadings to be typewritten or prepared by mechanical processing methods); � 1.51(c)(2) (designating number of copies to be filed); � 1.52 (requiring that a party not
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1390A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1390A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1390A2.txt
  • section 271 statutory requirements for a given state, the BOC may incorporate by reference its prior showing for those aspects, provided that it certifies in the subsequent application that its actions and performance at that time are consistent with the prior showing. See, e.g., Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3969, para. 53. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.49, 1.741-1.749. See id. at � 1.49. Item (e) is obviously the core portion of the Brief in Support, and may be quite lengthy. It may help to divide it, therefore, into three subsections, one corresponding to each of the three requirements set forth in section 271(d)(3). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.743. See Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1589A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1589A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1589A2.txt
  • These regressions were run to determine whether sellers varied in their ability to operate profitably in the various concentration treatments. Observations = 24 F(3, 20) = 2.38 Prob > F = 0.1000 R2 = .2631 Root MSE = 50.43 Seller #1 Net Surplus Coefficient (t-value) (95% Confidence. Interval) Low/High -27.37 (1.09) -79.97 25.22 High/High -55.87 (-2.22) -108.47 -3.27 Period -13.75 (-1.49) -32.95 5.45 Constant 49.5 (.79) -80.77 179.77 Table 18: Seller #1 Net Surplus Regression (CAP MFN Treatment) Observations = 24 F(3, 20) = 1.90 Prob > F = 0.1622 R2 = .3054 Root MSE = 19.382 Seller #2 Net Surplus Coefficient (t-value) (95% Confidence. Interval) Low/High -28.125 (-1.63) -64.14 7.89 High/High -36.75 (-2.13) -72.76 -.7315 Period 3.41 (.54) -9.73 16.56
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1666A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1666A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1666A2.txt
  • section 271 statutory requirements for a given state, the BOC may incorporate by reference its prior showing for those aspects, provided that it certifies in the subsequent application that its actions and performance at that time are consistent with the prior showing. See, e.g., Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3969, para. 53. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.49, 1.741-1.749. See id. at � 1.49. Item (e) is obviously the core portion of the Brief in Support, and may be quite lengthy. It may help to divide it, therefore, into three subsections, one corresponding to each of the three requirements set forth in section 271(d)(3). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.743. See Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1777A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1777A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1777A1.txt
  • Arkansas, et al., MM Docket No. 87-619, 4 FCC Rcd 6170 (1989). Furthermore, LLBN's counsel's reliance on the claimed inoperability of the Commission's ECFS system is misplaced. In fact, the Commission has specifically excluded the filing of comments in broadcast allotment proceedings from electronic filing. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998) and Section 1.49(f) of the Commission's Rules. Additionally, there is no public interest basis to accept LLBN's comments. Essentially, LLBN opposes the subject rulemaking proposal, in part, because it has a mutually exclusive application for a new LPTV station on NTSC Channel 29 at Banning, California, and, if DTV Channel 29 is allotted to Ontario as proposed, no substitute channel is available to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1857A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1857A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1857A2.txt
  • section 271 statutory requirements for a given state, the BOC may incorporate by reference its prior showing for those aspects, provided that it certifies in the subsequent application that its actions and performance at that time are consistent with the prior showing. See, e.g., Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3969, para. 53. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.49, 1.741-1.749. See id. at � 1.49. Item (e) is obviously the core portion of the Brief in Support, and may be quite lengthy. It may help to divide it, therefore, into three subsections, one corresponding to each of the three requirements set forth in section 271(d)(3). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.743. See Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1893A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1893A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1893A2.txt
  • section 271 statutory requirements for a given state, the BOC may incorporate by reference its prior showing for those aspects, provided that it certifies in the subsequent application that its actions and performance at that time are consistent with the prior showing. See, e.g., Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3969, para. 53. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.49, 1.741-1.749. See id. at � 1.49. Item (e) is obviously the core portion of the Brief in Support, and may be quite lengthy. It may help to divide it, therefore, into three subsections, one corresponding to each of the three requirements set forth in section 271(d)(3). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.743. See Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2357A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2357A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2357A2.txt
  • section 271 statutory requirements for a given state, the BOC may incorporate by reference its prior showing for those aspects, provided that it certifies in the subsequent application that its actions and performance at that time are consistent with the prior showing. See, e.g., Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3969, para. 53. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.49, 1.741-1.749. See id. at � 1.49. Item (e) is obviously the core portion of the Brief in Support, and may be quite lengthy. It may help to divide it, therefore, into three subsections, one corresponding to each of the three requirements set forth in section 271(d)(3). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.743. See Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2438A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2438A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2438A2.txt
  • section 271 statutory requirements for a given state, the BOC may incorporate by reference its prior showing for those aspects, provided that it certifies in the subsequent application that its actions and performance at that time are consistent with the prior showing. See, e.g., Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3969, para. 53. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.49, 1.741-1.749. See id. at � 1.49. Item (e) is obviously the core portion of the Brief in Support, and may be quite lengthy. It may help to divide it, therefore, into three subsections, one corresponding to each of the three requirements set forth in section 271(d)(3). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.743. See Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3090A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3090A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3090A1.txt
  • public notices were released more than ten days before comments were due in this proceeding, providing ample time for counsel to seek clarification from the Commission's Secretary. Further, the Electronic Comment Filing System has never been an option for parties participating in broadcast allotment proceedings. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998) and Section 1.49(f) of the Commission's Rules. In any case, even if we allowed SJL's late comments, it had presented no basis for denial of the proposed channel change. 8 < @ K � � 3 4 L M x y @G
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-419A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-419A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-419A1.txt
  • Control of a Submarine Cable Landing License, CC Docket No. 98-184, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 14032 (Bell Atlantic/GTE Merger Order). Bell Atlantic/GTE Merger Order at Appendix D, � 19(f). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.200 et seq. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(2). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24121 (1998). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.49. Federal Communications Commission DA 02-419 PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 z { �� ��PNG r v ��"r�9 I'6� �d�Y�͆aX ���; Wh� �X,�aX���y�]\\.W`h���va6l! �v"]�V�at�������-``````�"m(c)x<��G�<���={-N��J%t�<== �"""x ҍ� � ��(c)���!��'' �R)&� �A�� "���\��v`` � 6� �� @&
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-567A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-567A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-567A1.txt
  • Regulatory, Verizon, to William Caton, Acting Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, CC Docket No. 98-184 (filed Mar. 7, 2002) (Verizon March 7th Ex Parte). Bell Atlantic/GTE Merger Order at Appendix D, para. 43. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.200 et seq. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(2). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24121 (1998). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.49. Federal Communications Commission DA 02-419 PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 �� ��PNG r v ��"r�9 I'6� �d�Y�͆aX ���; Wh� �X,�aX���y�]\\.W`h���va6l! �v"]�V�at�������-``````�"m(c)x<��G�<���={-N��J%t�<== �"""x ҍ� � ��(c)���!��'' �R)&� �A�� "���\��v`` � 6� ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-684A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-684A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-684A1.txt
  • section 271 statutory requirements for a given state, the BOC may incorporate by reference its prior showing for those aspects, provided that it certifies in the subsequent application that its actions and performance at that time are consistent with the prior showing. See, e.g., Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3969, para. 53. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.49, 1.741-1.749. See id. at � 1.49. Item (e) is obviously the core portion of the Brief in Support, and may be quite lengthy. It may help to divide it, therefore, into three subsections, one corresponding to each of the three requirements set forth in section 271(d)(3). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.743. See Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1019A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1019A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1019A2.txt
  • section 271 statutory requirements for a given state, the BOC may incorporate by reference its prior showing for those aspects, provided that it certifies in the subsequent application that its actions and performance at that time are consistent with the prior showing. See, e.g., Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3969, para. 53. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.49, 1.741-1.749. See id. at � 1.49. Item (e) is obviously the core portion of the Brief in Support, and may be quite lengthy. It may help to divide it, therefore, into three subsections, one corresponding to each of the three requirements set forth in section 271(d)(3). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.743. See Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1064A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1064A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1064A1.txt
  • This document may also be purchased from the Commission's duplicating contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-B402, Washington, DC, 20554, telephone 202-863-2893, facsimile 202-863-2898, or via e-mail qualexint@aol.com. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. We direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, regardless of the length of their submission. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-125A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-125A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-125A2.txt
  • section 271 statutory requirements for a given state, the BOC may incorporate by reference its prior showing for those aspects, provided that it certifies in the subsequent application that its actions and performance at that time are consistent with the prior showing. See, e.g., Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3969, para. 53. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.49, 1.741-1.749. See id. at � 1.49. Item (e) is obviously the core portion of the Brief in Support, and may be quite lengthy. It may help to divide it, therefore, into three subsections, one corresponding to each of the three requirements set forth in section 271(d)(3). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.743. See Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1458A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1458A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1458A1.txt
  • This document may also be purchased from the Commission's duplicating contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-B402, Washington, DC, 20554, telephone 202-863-2893, facsimile 202-863-2898, or via e-mail qualexint@aol.com. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. We direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, regardless of the length of their submission. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-156A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-156A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-156A2.txt
  • section 271 statutory requirements for a given state, the BOC may incorporate by reference its prior showing for those aspects, provided that it certifies in the subsequent application that its actions and performance at that time are consistent with the prior showing. See, e.g., Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3969, para. 53. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.49, 1.741-1.749. See id. at � 1.49. Item (e) is obviously the core portion of the Brief in Support, and may be quite lengthy. It may help to divide it, therefore, into three subsections, one corresponding to each of the three requirements set forth in section 271(d)(3). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.743. See Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2039A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2039A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2039A2.txt
  • section 271 statutory requirements for a given state, the BOC may incorporate by reference its prior showing for those aspects, provided that it certifies in the subsequent application that its actions and performance at that time are consistent with the prior showing. See, e.g., Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3969, para. 53. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.49, 1.741-1.749. See id. at � 1.49. Item (e) is obviously the core portion of the Brief in Support, and may be quite lengthy. It may help to divide it, therefore, into three subsections, one corresponding to each of the three requirements set forth in section 271(d)(3). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.743. See Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2081A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2081A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2081A1.txt
  • This document may also be purchased from the Commission's duplicating contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-B402, Washington, DC, 20554, telephone 202-863-2893, facsimile 202-863-2898, or via e-mail qualexint@aol.com. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. We direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, regardless of the length of their submission. We also strongly encourage parties to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2344A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2344A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2344A2.txt
  • section 271 statutory requirements for a given state, the BOC may incorporate by reference its prior showing for those aspects, provided that it certifies in the subsequent application that its actions and performance at that time are consistent with the prior showing. See, e.g., Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3969, para. 53. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.49, 1.741-1.749. See id. at � 1.49. Item (e) is obviously the core portion of the Brief in Support, and may be quite lengthy. It may help to divide it, therefore, into three subsections, one corresponding to each of the three requirements set forth in section 271(d)(3). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.743. See Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2684A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2684A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2684A1.txt
  • 96-42, 11 FCC Rcd 3030 (1996) (``Frivolous Pleadings Notice''). In particular, we find the LRT Petition to be procedurally defective because, when its 11-point typeface and 1.5 line spacing are converted to the required 12-point typeface and double spacing, the petition exceeds 30 pages, considerably longer than the prescribed 25 page limit for petitions for reconsideration. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.49(a), 1.106(f) (2002). Furthermore, the rules provide that the length of any document filed in electronic form shall be equal to the length of the document if printed out and formatted according to the specifications of � 1.49(a) or shall be no more than 250 words per page. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.49(f)(2) (2002). LRT's petition, even without its attachment, exceeds
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2685A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2685A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2685A1.txt
  • This document may also be purchased from the Commission's duplicating contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-B402, Washington, DC, 20554, telephone 202-863-2893, facsimile 202-863-2898, or via e-mail qualexint@aol.com. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. We direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, regardless of the length of their submission. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2799A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2799A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2799A2.txt
  • section 271 statutory requirements for a given state, the BOC may incorporate by reference its prior showing for those aspects, provided that it certifies in the subsequent application that its actions and performance at that time are consistent with the prior showing. See, e.g., Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3969, para. 53. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.49, 1.741-1.749. See id. at � 1.49. Item (e) is obviously the core portion of the Brief in Support, and may be quite lengthy. It may help to divide it, therefore, into three subsections, one corresponding to each of the three requirements set forth in section 271(d)(3). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.743. See Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2827A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2827A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2827A1.txt
  • This document may also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-B402, Washington, DC, 20554, telephone 202-863-2893, facsimile 202-863-2898, or via e-mail qualexint@aol.com. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. � 1.49. We direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, regardless of the length of their submission. Pursuant to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-92A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-92A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-92A2.txt
  • section 271 statutory requirements for a given state, the BOC may incorporate by reference its prior showing for those aspects, provided that it certifies in the subsequent application that its actions and performance at that time are consistent with the prior showing. See, e.g., Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3969, para. 53. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.49, 1.741-1.749. See id. at � 1.49. Item (e) is obviously the core portion of the Brief in Support, and may be quite lengthy. It may help to divide it, therefore, into three subsections, one corresponding to each of the three requirements set forth in section 271(d)(3). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.743. See Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1499A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1499A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1499A1.txt
  • 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554; e-mail: John.Copes@ fcc.gov. . (7) James Lande, Economist, Industry Analysis and Technology Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554; e-mail: Jim.Lande@fcc.gov. . Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments' length of their submission. We also strongly encourage that parties track the organization set forth in the NPRM in order to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2092A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2092A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2092A1.txt
  • 14882-84, �� 410 -12 (Appendix D, 14 FCC Rcd at 15034-35, � 66). See also Delegation of Additional Authority to the Enforcement Bureau, 17 FCC Rcd 4795 (2002) (delegating authority to the Enforcement Bureau to carry out merger-related audit and compliance tasks). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.415, 1.419. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.49. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202 / 418-2830 TTY 202 / 418-2555 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov � � gd@ �@��� ' 7 � � � � � � � � ����PNG RR�~R�n� |�o� |�o� X*�N�*K � ~j0tm@"Iu�� �2~��y=��b��"���05 X� ?''z[�'';: ''@�/'", �Z!� g$!���H (c)� � .[�'' ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2093A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2093A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2093A1.txt
  • at 14190-93, �� 336-342 (Appendix D, 15 FCC Rcd at 14327-28, � 56). See also Delegation of Additional Authority to the Enforcement Bureau, 17 FCC Rcd 4795 (2002) (delegating authority to the Enforcement Bureau to carry out merger-related audit and compliance tasks). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.415, 1.419. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.49. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202 / 418-2830 TTY 202 / 418-2555 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov � � gd@ E U � (c) � � � � � � ����PNG RR�~R�n� |�o� |�o� X*�N�*K � ~j0tm@"Iu�� �2~��y=��b��"���05 X� ?''z[�'';: ''@�/'", �Z!� g$!���H (c)� � .[�'' �� �]�'
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2512A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2512A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2512A1.txt
  • International Bureau, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554; e-mail: John.Copes@ fcc.gov. (7) Peggy Reitzel, Telecommunications Specialist, Policy Division, International Bureau, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554; e-mail: Peggy.Reitzel@fcc.gov. . . Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. All parties are encouraged to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments' length of their submission. We also strongly encourage that parties track the organization set forth in this International E-Filing NPRM in order to facilitate our internal review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3857A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3857A1.txt
  • Fox, Deputy Division Chief, Policy Division, International Bureau, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554; e-mail: claudia.fox@fcc.gov. (4) Francis Gutierrez, Attorney, Policy Division, International Bureau, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554; e-mail: francis.gutierrez@fcc.gov. (5) Mark Uretsky, Senior Economist, Policy Division, International Bureau, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554; e-mail: mark.uretsky@fcc.gov. Comments and reply comments must comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. All parties are encouraged to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their submission. Commenters that file what they consider to be proprietary information may request confidential treatment pursuant to section 0.459 of the Commission's rules. Commenters should file both their
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3864A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3864A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3864A1.txt
  • this case there was no equipment available to order. We also reject Mobex's contention that a petition for rulemaking is needed for the requested extension. Havens merely seeks an extension of the construction deadline for his licenses rather than global relief or wholesale change to the M-LMS rules. Finally, Mobex contends that Havens' Reply Comments do not comply with Sections 1.49(b) and (c) of the Commission's rules and therefore should be dismissed. Section 1.49(b) requires that all pleadings which exceed ten pages shall include a table of contents, and Section 1.49(c) requires that all such pleadings shall include a summary. As noted above, we have accepted Havens' belated filing of the required table of contents and summary, and we do not
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-550A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-550A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-550A1.txt
  • FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Barbara A. Kreisman Chief, Video Division Media Bureau United filed a Petition for Leave to Submit Comments since its comments were received after the date established for filing comments. In its Petition, United states that its comments were late because, the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (``ECFS'') refused to accept its comments. We note, however, that Section 1.49 (f) of the Commission's Rules specifically excludes electronic filing of comments in broadcast allotment proceedings. Also see Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). However, we will consider United's comments in part in order to address United's concerns regarding interference. Citing, Sixth Report and Order (``Sixth Report and Order''), 12 FCC Rcd 14588 (1997) at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-763A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-763A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-763A1.txt
  • electronic file. All parties must file one copy of each pleading electronically or by paper to each of the following: ; facsimile: (202) 863-2898; phone (202) 863-2893. . . . . . Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments' length of their submission. We also strongly encourage that parties track the organization set forth in the NPRM in order to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2950A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2950A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2950A1.txt
  • actual knowledge of the contents thereof. The City also requests that the Commission sanction Comcast by dismissing the Petition -- for failing to adhere to a prior warning by the Bureau in an unrelated matter-- because the footnote font is smaller than 12-point and the spacing between footnote lines may be smaller than the minimum allowed by Commission rule Section 1.49(a). In reply, Comcast argues that the City's preliminary objections are misguided and provide no basis for dismissal. Comcast asserts that the declaration supporting the Petition is consistent with Section 1.16 of the Commission's rules because it was signed by the local Comcast official under the penalty of perjury that the information was true and accurate. Finally, Comcast argues that the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-520A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-520A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-520A1.txt
  • 47 C.F.R. � 54.713. Thus, the Commission has given USAC the authority to assess late filing fees. Atlantic Digital Appeal at 1. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.7. See Instructions to the Telecommunications Reporting Worksheet, FCC Form 499-Q, at 7 (dated March 2001). Id. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.721(c); July 29, 2004 Letter at 1. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.49, 54.721(b)(2). The Division also noted that the appeal failed to comply with section 54.721(a) of the Commission's rules, requiring a particular format for captions for requests for review. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.721(a); July 29, 2004 Letter at 1. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 05-520 Federal Communications Commission DA 05-520 � - O W Z s
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-125A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-125A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-125A1.txt
  • file petitions and informal objections (pleadings) regarding ULS applications or licenses by submitting paper copies with the FCC Secretary's office. With this enhancement, the Bureau furthers the Commission's Spectrum Management and Modernizing the FCC goals by expediting the existing process, simplifying how users file pleadings, and implementing the ULS electronic filing capability for pleadings that the Commission adopted in Section 1.49(e) of its Rules. ULS Pleadings Enhancements The on-line pleadings submission feature provides ULS users with filing and search capabilities. Filing. Users can submit pleadings regarding ULS applications and/or licenses; Search. If there is a pleading regarding an application or license, the ULS Application and License Search results will display the type of pleading, the title of the pleading, and the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-224A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-224A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-224A1.txt
  • parties and announce a date, ten business days after such notification, by which each party may file a Statement of Position with the Chief of PSCID, stating the submitting party's position on disputed issues. The filing of Statements of Position is optional. Statements shall not exceed twenty pages, inclusive of all appendices, attachments, and exhibits, and shall comply with Section 1.49 of the Commission's rules. Statements must be strictly limited to issues raised in the course of mediation and facts contained in the record. Parties may not introduce facts not contained in the record or introduce arguments on issues that were not presented to the mediator for consideration during mediation. Any material not conforming to the foregoing restrictions will be stricken.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1838A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1838A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1838A1.txt
  • March 7, 2005. Broadcast Actions, Public Notice, Report No. 45935 (Mar. 7, 2005). Petition at unnumbered page 2. 47 C.F.R. � 73.3527. WWIZ, Inc., 37 FCC at 686; see also National Association of Broadcasters, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 24414, 24415 (2003). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.106(c). The Hoosier Petition fails to comply with 47 C.F.R. � 1.49(a) (containing specifications for pleadings filed with the Commission), 47 C.F.R. � 1.49(c) (requiring that pleadings exceeding ten pages include as part of the pleading, ``a succinct, but accurate and clear condensation of the substance of the filing''), and 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106(d)(1) and (2) (requiring petitions for reconsideration to ``state with particularity the respects in which petitioner believes the action
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1938A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1938A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1938A1.txt
  • (1964), aff'd sub. nom Lorain Journal Co. v. FCC, 351 F.2d 824 (D.C. Cir. 1965), cert. denied 383 U.S. 967 (1966)(``WWIZ, Inc.''); see also National Association of Broadcasters, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 24414, 24415 (2003). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.106(c). Among the procedural rules with which the Hoosier Petition fails to comply are 47 C.F.R. � 1.49(a) (specifying pleading format requirements) and 47 C.F.R. � 1.49(c) (requiring succinct summaries of pleadings that exceed ten pages). WWIZ, Inc., 37 FCC at 686; See also William L. Carroll, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 8 FCC Rcd 6279 (1993). 47 C.F.R. � 73.561(b). Staff Decision at 2. 47 C.F.R. � 1.106(b) and (c). See Fatima Response, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1939A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1939A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1939A1.txt
  • was released on March 7, 2005, Public Notice, Broadcast Actions, Report No. 45935 (March 7, 2005). WWIZ, Inc., 37 FCC at 686; see also National Association of Broadcasters, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 24414, 24415 (2003). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.106(c). Among the procedural rules with which the Hoosier Petition fails to comply are 47 C.F.R. � 1.49(a), (specifying pleading format requirements) and 47 C.F.R. � 1.49(c) (requiring succinct summaries for pleadings that exceed ten pages). WWIZ, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 37 FCC 685, 686 (1964), aff'd sub. nom Lorain Journal Co. v. FCC, 351 F.2d 824 (D.C. Cir. 1965), cert. denied 383 U.S. 967 (1966)(``WWIZ, Inc.''). See also William L. Carroll, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 8
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A4.txt
  • 11.35 12.18 11.93 10.94 Arts,Educational,orDocumentaryProgramming 8.32 7.46 7.05 7.62 Eitherofthetwoabove 19.67 19.64 18.98 18.56 AdultProgramming NetworksShowingAdultProgramming 4.84 4.60 4.89 5.52 NC-17MoviesorTV-MA-S/TV-MA-LTV 0.75 0.48 0.63 0.83 ViolentProgramming "ViolentProgramming" 1.52 1.71 1.94 1.63 TV-PG-VTelevision 1.43 1.45 1.54 1.41 TV-14-VTelevision 1.37 1.40 1.56 1.51 TV-MA-VTelevision 0.15 0.16 0.23 0.22 Anyofthethreeabove 2.95 3.01 3.33 3.14 Anyofthelasttwoabove 1.52 1.56 1.79 1.73 ReligiousProgramming NetworksShowingPrimarilyReligiousProgramming 1.64 1.56 1.49 1.40 "ReligiousProgramming" 3.31 3.15 2.92 2.79 OverallTargeting AverageTVContentRating(wherenotedforTV) 3.71 3.75 3.84 3.93 AverageMPAARating(wherenotedformovies) 3.99 3.93 3.98 3.95 Observations 61,31464,56067,53071,984 Notes:Reportedinthetableisthepercentageofquarter-hoursofprogrammingbyprogramtypeandyear. ItistheanalogofTable6splitoutbyyear.Averageisoverthesamenetworksandtimeperiodsdescribed inthenotestoTable6.Source:Authorcalculations.39 Table11: ProgramAvailabilitybyProgramTypeandTime 6:00p.m.-12:00a.m.EST(orequivalent),2weeks/year,2003-2006 Variable 2003 2004 2005 2006 NewsProgramming AnyNews 47.79 46.11 48.59 51.07 NetworkNews 55.60 52.73 52.15 47.71 LocalNews 46.52 45.14 48.11 51.53 PublicAffairsProgramming 57.48 57.79 54.52 48.05 MinorityProgramming NetworksTargetingBlackAudiences 17.91 19.00 21.41 23.61 TargetingLatinoAudiences OnNetworksTargetingLatinoAudiences 14.14
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A5.txt
  • dependent variable is zero. To determine the factor change in the probability the dependent variable is non-zero, multiply the parameter estimate by -1 and take the antilog. II - 42 Table II-12 - ZINB Regression Results: Local Public Affairs Dependent Variable Independent Variables P-value Factor E[y|x] P-value Factor Pr(y=0|z) In-Market Stations Owned by Parent -0.0596 0.8110 0.9422 0.1333 0.2540 1.1426 -1.49 Out-of-Market Stations Owned by Parent -0.0004 0.8560 0.9996 -0.0004 0.5700 0.9996 0.00 Distance between Station and Parent (in ln(miles)) -0.2669 0.2490 0.7658 0.0422 0.6940 1.0431 -2.44 Waived Prohibition on In-Market Newspaper Cross- ownership (1=yes) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Cross-owned with TV Station in DMA (1=yes) -0.9246 0.3200 0.3967 0.3295 0.5440 1.3903 -6.15 Percentage of Other Market Stations
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • (1.80) 0.0253 (0.32) -0.0212 (-0.98) 0.0000 (-0.55) 0.0401 276 Percent Entertainment/Leisure/DJ Banter, Evening 0.0471 (0.10) 0.0000 (0.00) -0.0724 (-0.55) -0.0030 (-0.08) 0.0000 (0.06) -0.0315 276 Percent Music, Evening -1.8120*(2.34) 0.0120 (1.02) -0.0628 (-0.28) -0.0138 (-0.23) -0.0001 (-1.51) 0.3553 276 Percent News, Evening 0.0460 (0.30) 0.0010 (0.45) 0.0406 (0.92) -0.0030 (-0.25) 0.0000 (-0.37) 0.1381 276 Percent Sports, Evening 1.1875 (1.92) -0.0139 (1.49) -0.1275 (-0.72) 0.0867 (1.80) 0.0001 (1.76) 0.1494 276 Average Block, Advertisements, AM Drive -0.3488 (0.11) 0.0394 (0.77) -0.9434 (-1.00) 0.1923 (0.74) -0.0003 (-1.63) 0.0093 250 Average Block, Entertainment/Leisure/DJ Banter, AM Drive -4.2684 (0.56) 0.0226 (0.19) 6.0971*(2.79) -0.3916 (-0.65) 0.0003 (0.60) 0.0232 250 Average Block, Music, AM Drive -0.4603 (0.10) -0.0554 (0.80) -0.7444 (-0.58) -0.3532 (-0.99) 0.0001 (0.50) 0.1028 250 Average
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A7.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A7.txt
  • Yes Yes Adjusted R-squared .04 .04 .04 .05 .05 Notes: Absolute values of t-statistics in parentheses (using heteroscedastic-consistent standard errors corrected for clustering by television station); ***p<.01, **p<.05 and *p<.10 47 Table 15: Difference in Partisan Issue Coverage (Democratic coverage less Republican coverage, in seconds) Independent variables (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Local station ownership Cross-owned newspaper -2.9 (0.33) -17.9 (1.49) -9.3 (0.77) -6.2 (0.53) -6.6 (0.56) Cross-owned radio station -10.3 (0.86) -17.0 (1.34) -27.1* (1.87) -27.0* (1.89) Cross-owned radio and newspaper 44.5* (1.91) 37.4* (1.71) 41.8* (1.96) 42.2* (1.90) Parent company coverage of all television households (%) -1.9*** (3.05) -1.9** (2.38) -1.9** (2.25) Network owned and operated 43.9*** (2.83) 44.1** (2.00) 44.4** (1.92) Network affiliation (omitted category is CW\MyNetwork) ABC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3543A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3543A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3543A1.txt
  • substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). Pursuant to sections 1.49 and 1.51 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R �� 1.49, 1.51, interested parties may file comments on or before September 7, 2007 and reply comments on or before September 24, 2007. All filings should refer to WC Docket No. 07-168. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4453A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4453A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4453A1.txt
  • and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. See id. Pursuant to sections 1.45 and 1.49 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.45, 1.49, interested parties may file comments on the petition on or before November 13, 2007 and reply comments on or before November 23, 2007. All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Marlene H. Dortch, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW, Suite TW-A325, Washington, D.C. 20554.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-947A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-947A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-947A1.txt
  • to support the methodology used by Bright House. The County requests that we disregard the Petition and exhibits because the declaration does not authenticate them. The County also requests that the Commission reject or dismiss the Petition because the footnote font is smaller than 12-point and the spacing between footnote lines may be smaller than the minimum allowed by Section 1.49(a) of the Commission's rules. The County claims that Bright House used the small footnote font and spacing for the purpose of evading the Commission's requirement that documents exceeding 10 pages contain a table of contents and a summary. Alternatively, the County asks that we view the declaration as an evidence of Bright House's lack of credibility and refuse to accept
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1086A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1086A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1086A1.txt
  • with sufficient prima facie evidence that WPV has been warehousing spectrum in seeking reconsideration of WPV I. On May 18, WPV filed an opposition to the Petition. WPV contends that the petitioners lack standing to petition for the denial of the instant assignment application. In addition, WPV states that the petitioners failed to comply with the requirements set-forth in Section 1.49 of the Commission's Rules for the filing of pleadings that exceed ten pages in length. With respect to the eligibility of ATI and WPV to hold an EBS license, WPV contends that the Petition is an untimely attempt to seek reconsideration of the license grant. WPV further states that the ownership information in its FCC Form 602 is correct. Moreover,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1482A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1482A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1482A1.txt
  • substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). Pursuant to section 1.49 and 1.51 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.49, 1.51, interested parties may file comments on or before July 25, 2008 and reply comments on or before August 11, 2008. All filings should refer to WC Docket No. 08-93. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1586A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1586A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1586A1.txt
  • Priority mail must be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW, Washington DC 20554. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (tty). . or via fax at 202-395-5167. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments also must comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, and to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their submission. We also strongly encourage that parties track the organization set forth in this Further Notice in order to facilitate our
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1065A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1065A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1065A1.txt
  • Dismiss because the Motion does not comply with certain procedural rules. MAP Opposition to Motion to Dismiss at 2, �� 1-2. Specifically, MAP asserts that the Motion fails to include proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.727(b), and to include a table of contents and summary, as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.49. As to the latter, we decline to dismiss the Motion at this stage of the proceeding for such minor noncompliance with the rules. As to the former, we note that Defendants did provide, in compliance with 47 C.F.R. � 1.727(c), a proposed order that incorporates its proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law. We decline to dismiss the Motion
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2515A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2515A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2515A1.txt
  • is the day after the day on which the act . . . occurs''); see also Third E-Mail at 1. 47 C.F.R. � 1.106 (g, h). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.46(a). Second E-Mail at 1. Fourth E-Mail at 1. Petition, Exh. 1. Third E-Mail at 2; Petition, Exh. 2. 47 C.F.R. � 1.106 (g, h). See generally 47 C.F.R. �� 1.49 - .52. 47 C.F.R. � 0.283. (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2515 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2515 / 0 � � / 4 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1741A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1741A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1741A1.txt
  • Plan Survey of Businesses 02/28/13 3060-1131 Implementation of the NET 911 Improvement Act of 2008: Location Information from Owners and Controllers of 911 and E911 Capabilities 12/31/12 3060-1133 FCC 308 and Secs. 73.3545 and 73.3580 01/31/13 3060-1135 Revisions to Rules Authorizing the Operation of Low Power Auxiliary Stations (including Wireless Microphones) 08/31/13 3060-1136 Spectrum Dashboard Customer Feedback 08/31/13 3060-1138 Secs. 1.49 and 1.54 04/30/13 3060-1139 Residential Fixed Broadband Services Testing and Measurement 04/30/11 3060-1140 Requests for Waiver of Various Petitioners to Allow the Establishment of 700 MHz Interoperable Public Safety Wireless Broadband Networks 11/30/13 Federal Communications Commission DA 10-1741 � � kd� kd kd kd" * @ I J T a j k u � � � - � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-459A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-459A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-459A1.txt
  • programming in Toledo, Ohio. We find that WTVG made the requisite showing to support its petition. As required by the rules, WTVG has provided community-specific survey results for WXYZ-TV for each year surveyed. For the first year, the results show that WXYZ-TV attained a 0.10 percent share of total viewing hours (0.05 reported share + 0.05 standard error) and a 1.49 percent net weekly circulation share (0.74 reported share + 0.75 standard error). For the second year, the results indicate that WXYZ-TV attained a 0.05 percent share of total viewing hours (0.03 reported share + 0.02 standard error) and a 3.99 percent net weekly circulation share (2.33 reported share + 1.68 standard error). Accordingly, each of the reported audience statistics, plus
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-812A1.pdf
  • Formatting Your Petition Your petition must include the following items: oA plain, concise, written summarystatement of the relief you seek; oA full statement of your case for relief; and oAppendices that list: othe scope of relief you seek; oall relevant data, including market analysis; and oanysupporting statements or affidavits. Your petition must complywith the general filing requirements in 47 C.F.R. �1.49, which include requirements on the paper size, margins and font size you should use in your petition.3 1A copy of the rules is at http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/cpd/forbearance/forbearance-rules.pdf. You can also find the Commission's order on the Commission website at http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/cpd/forbearance. SeePetition to Establish Procedural Requirements to Govern Proceedings for Forbearance Under Section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as Amended, Report
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1011A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1011A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1011A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1011A1_Rcd.pdf
  • prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex partepresentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) orfor which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should familiarize
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1017A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1017A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1017A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1019A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1019A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1019A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1019A1_Rcd.pdf
  • prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex partepresentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1046A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1046A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1046A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1046A1_Rcd.pdf
  • prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex partepresentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1047A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1047A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1047A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1133A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1133A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1133A1.txt
  • filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. In proceedings governed by section 1.49(f) of the rules or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1133A1_Rcd.pdf
  • or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex partepresentations and must be filedconsistent with section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. In proceedings governed by section 1.49(f) of the rules or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1177A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1177A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1177A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1182A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1182A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1182A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with Section 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by Section 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1182A1_Rcd.pdf
  • prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex partepresentations and must be filed consistent with Section 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by Section 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1198A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1198A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1198A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1210A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1210A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1210A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with Section 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by Section 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1210A1_Rcd.pdf
  • prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex partepresentations and must be filed consistent with Section 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by Section 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1231A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1231A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1231A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1231A1_Rcd.pdf
  • prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex partepresentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentationsand memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should familiarize
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1238A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1488A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1488A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1488A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1488A1_Rcd.pdf
  • prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex partepresentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1555A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1555A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1555A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1555A1_Rcd.pdf
  • prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex partepresentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1557A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1557A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1557A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1557A1_Rcd.pdf
  • the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them 2547 C.F.R. �� 1.1200 et seq. 13022 in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex partepresentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1558A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1558A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1558A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1563A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1563A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1563A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1576A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1576A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1576A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1590A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1590A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1590A1.txt
  • filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. In proceedings governed by section 1.49(f) of the rules or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1606A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1606A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1606A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1707A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1707A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1707A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1879A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1879A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1879A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1930A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1930A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1930A1.txt
  • PETITIONS, VIA THE ELECTRONIC COMMENT FILING SYSTEM Effective January 3, 2012, the Commission will no longer accept and consider Cable Special Relief (CSR) and Cable Show Cause (CSC) petitions filed on paper. As of that date, such petitions must be submitted electronically, utilizing the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS). This change in filing procedures is made pursuant to Section 1.49(f) of the Commission's Rules, as recently amended in the Commission's Report and Order released on February 4, 2011. Therein, the Commission revised portions of its Part 1 practice and procedural rules and its Part 0 organizational rules to increase the efficiency of Commission decision-making and modernize the agency's processes in the digital age. How to File To allow parties to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1936A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1936A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1936A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1954A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1954A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1954A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2002A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2002A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2002A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2038A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2038A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2038A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2038A1_Rcd.pdf
  • prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex partepresentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2095A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2095A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2095A1.txt
  • VIA THE ELECTRONIC COMMENT FILING SYSTEM Effective January 3, 2012, the Commission will no longer accept and consider new Cable Special Relief (CSR) and Cable Show Cause (CSC) petitions filed on paper. As of that date, such petitions must be submitted electronically, utilizing the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS). This change in filing procedures is made pursuant to Section 1.49(f) of the Commission's Rules, as recently amended in the Commission's Report and Order released on February 4, 2011. Therein, the Commission revised portions of its Part 1 practice and procedural rules and its Part 0 organizational rules to increase the efficiency of Commission decision-making and modernize the agency's processes in the digital age. The Commission implemented the requirement by Public
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-614A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-614A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-614A1.txt
  • the Federal Register. Accordingly, interested parties may file comments on or before May 20, 2011, and reply comments on or before July 5, 2011. All pleadings are to reference CG Docket No. 11-41. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with Section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. We direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, regardless of the length of their submission. We also strongly encourage parties to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-967A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-967A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-967A1.txt
  • 1 Order''). Id. at � � 10, 15. Id. at � 10. Id. at � 15. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.720-1.736. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1401-1.1418. Note that these new rules do not affect existing section 208 formal complaints or existing section 224 pole attachment complaints. They also do not concern carrier-to-carrier informal complaints. See Id. at Appendix A, (listing new rule �1.49(f)(1)(i) that requires ``[f]ormal complaint proceedings under Section 208 . . . '' to be filed electronically and excluding informal complaints from that rule). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 ��PNG r v ��"r�9 I'6� �d�Y�͆aX ���; Wh� �X,�aX���y�]\\.W`h���va6l! �v"]�V�at�������-``````�"m(c)x<��G�<���={-N��J%t�<== �"""x ҍ� � ��(c)���!��'' �R)&�
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-992A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-992A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-992A1.txt
  • filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. In proceedings governed by section 1.49(f) of the rules or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-1002A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-1002A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-1002A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-1007A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-1007A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-1007A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-1009A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-1009A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-1009A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-103A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-103A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-103A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-103A1_Rcd.pdf
  • prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex partepresentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-119A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-119A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-119A1.txt
  • filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with � 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. In proceedings governed by � 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-121A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-121A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-121A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-121A1_Rcd.pdf
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-156A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-156A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-156A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-176A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-176A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-176A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-176A1_Rcd.pdf
  • prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex partepresentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-202A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-202A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-202A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-202A1_Rcd.pdf
  • prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex partepresentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex partepresentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex partepresentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should familiarize themselves
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-208A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-208A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-208A1.txt
  • filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. In proceedings governed by section 1.49(f) of the rules or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-209A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-209A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-209A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-209A1_Rcd.pdf
  • or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data orarguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex partepresentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedingsgoverned by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-210A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-210A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-210A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-210A1_Rcd.pdf
  • prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex partepresentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-214A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-214A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-214A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-214A1_Rcd.pdf
  • prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex partepresentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-220A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-220A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-220A1.txt
  • filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. In proceedings governed by section 1.49(f) of the rules or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-256A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-256A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-256A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-256A1_Rcd.pdf
  • prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex partepresentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.txt
  • 2009 3.84 3.67 2.93 * (805) (810) (1295) Contour Measure 2005 3.65 4.71 * 5.91 * (1250) (827) (990) 2007 3.37 4.42 * 5.62 * (1018) (793) (1206) 2009 2.48 3.29 * 4.14 * (925) (766) (1219) Foreign Language Format Market Measure 2005 2.45 2.07 1.85 * (89) (50) (75) 2007 2.87 2.28 2.17 * (69) (57) (104) 2009 2.23 1.49 * 1.53 * (76) (54) (116) Contour Measure 2005 2.04 2.17 2.40 (108) (64) (42) 2007 2.31 2.46 2.51 (98) (73) (59) 2009 1.70 1.76 1.77 (103) (68) (75) Religion Format Market Measure 2005 2.14 1.65 1.30 * (55) (41) (52) 2007 1.53 1.85 1.33 (39) (32) (62) 2009 1.18 1.59 0.88 (34) (36) (57) Contour Measure 2005 1.70 1.55
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-304A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-304A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-304A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-304A1_Rcd.pdf
  • prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex partepresentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-308A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-308A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-308A1.txt
  • filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with � 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. In proceedings governed by � 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-311A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-311A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-311A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-32A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-32A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-32A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-46A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-46A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-46A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-46A1_Rcd.pdf
  • prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex partepresentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-506A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-506A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-506A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-506A1_Rcd.pdf
  • prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex partepresentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-511A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-511A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-511A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-523A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-523A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-523A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-523A1_Rcd.pdf
  • her prior comments, memoranda,or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex partepresentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oralex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should familiarize
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-544A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-544A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-544A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-555A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-555A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-555A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-566A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-566A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-566A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-573A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-573A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-573A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-573A1_Rcd.pdf
  • prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex partepresentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filedthrough the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should familiarize
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-581A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-581A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-581A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-583A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-583A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-583A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-609A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-609A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-609A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-633A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-633A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-633A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-635A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-635A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-635A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-636A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-636A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-636A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-662A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-662A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-662A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-672A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-672A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-672A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-677A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-677A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-677A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-681A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-681A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-681A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-683A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-683A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-683A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-686A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-686A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-686A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-692A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-692A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-692A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-700A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-700A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-700A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-705A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-705A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-705A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-707A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-707A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-707A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-712A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-712A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-712A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-718A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-718A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-718A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-719A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-719A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-719A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-723A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-723A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-723A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-759A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-759A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-759A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-75A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-75A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-75A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-75A1_Rcd.pdf
  • her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or givento Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex partepresentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-760A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-760A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-760A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-776A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-776A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-776A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-779A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-779A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-779A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-783A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-783A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-783A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-794A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-794A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-794A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-798A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-798A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-798A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-811A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-811A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-811A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-818A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-818A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-818A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-825A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-825A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-825A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-834A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-834A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-834A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-850A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-850A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-850A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-852A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-852A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-852A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-857A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-857A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-865A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-865A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-865A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-868A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-868A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-868A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-881A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-881A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-881A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-883A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-883A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-883A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-905A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-905A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-905A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-911A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-911A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-911A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-922A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-922A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-922A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-926A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-926A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-926A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-950A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-950A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-950A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-959A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-959A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-959A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-976A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-976A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-976A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-983A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-983A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-983A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-984A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-984A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-984A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-994A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-994A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-994A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-104945A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-104945A1.txt
  • of this Notice, or in the body of the text if by Internet). You must note whether an electronic submission is an exact copy of formal comments on the subject line. You also must include your full name and Postal Service mailing address in your submission. 16172 Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-158 457. Comments and replies must comply with Section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. We also direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and replies. Comments and replies must also clearly identify the specific portion of this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to which a particular comment or set
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208380A7.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208380A7.txt
  • 6,414 582 0.22 0.82 1.28 1.77 7 15 19 20 20Singapore 867 4,748 152 5,767 2,604 0.18 0.43 0.40 0.56 6 16 29 n.a. n.a.Chile 1,081 4,585 38 5,704 1,308 0.23 0.82 1.09 1.96 7 17 13 12 14Philippines 3,143 1,847 2 4,992 2,574 1.70 2.17 3.43 5.05 6 18 16 16 16Venezuela 1,913 2,412 0 4,325 1,700 0.79 1.31 1.49 2.14 1 19 n.a. n.a. n.a.Denmark 1,267 234 2,520 4,021 542 0.46 2.89 5.82 7.00 6 20 23 29 29Argentina 779 3,150 30 3,959 1,128 0.24 0.46 0.76 1.34 6 21 28 27 23Colombia 1,391 2,273 24 3,688 1,313 0.61 1.26 1.54 3.11 7 22 15 17 17Taiwan 1,647 1,837 48 3,532 4,580 0.87 0.71 1.64 2.32 7 23 n.a.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • five and added to multiline business counts. 1 - 7 Table 1.4 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges by Carrier (In Cents per Minute) 1/ Rates Effective from 7/1/01-12/31/01 Year 2000 Minutes of Use Carrier (Millions) Common Line per Company Originating Access CCL CCL Local Minute OriginatingTerminatingSwitching BellSouth 0.00� 0.00� 0.36� 0.18� 1.10� 27,845 57,012 83,187 Cincinnati Bell 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.21 1.49 1,042 2,162 3,215 Citizens 0.57 0.00 0.87 0.65 3.69 2,747 2,865 5,680 Global Crossing 0.05 0.00 0.61 0.41 2.15 575 1,583 2,160 Iowa Telecom 0.81 0.00 0.84 0.15 2.90 134 185 331 Qwest 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.18 1.47 21,018 39,686 61,107 SBC 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.21 1.30 64,610 92,623 158,985 Sprint 0.03 0.00 0.63 0.17 1.68 10,375 15,681 26,235 Verizon
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A8.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A8.txt
  • (6) (7) (8) Chg. HUT Viewing '95-'00 Chg. Daily Paper Circ. per cap '93-'99 Chg. Weekly Paper Circ. per cap '93-'99 Chg. AQH List '94-'98 Chg. AQH News List '93-'97 Chg. Cable Use '94-'00 Int Use '00 Int News Use '00 Chg. TV Stns. '94-'00 0.6104 -0.0157 0.1023 0.0779 -0.0259 -0.3002 -0.7365 -0.6838 (1.84) (0.07) (0.14) (1.33) (0.78) (1.06) (0.91) (1.49) Chg. Inside Radio Stns '93-'97 -0.0898 -0.1078 -0.1958 0.0091 -0.1842 -0.1856 (1.01) (1.67) (1.02) (0.56) (2.43)* (0.85) Chg. Daily Papers '93-'99 -0.2157 1.4125 -0.1983 -0.0929 0.0028 -0.2911 1.3533 0.8029 (0.63) (5.72)** (0.27) (1.56) (0.08) (1.00) (1.62) (1.70) Chg. Weekly Papers '93-'99 0.0075 0.0203 0.0444 -0.0033 0.0024 0.0180 0.0504 0.0198 (0.39) (1.48) (1.09) (1.01) (1.24) (1.11) (1.08) (0.75) Chg. Inside News
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262086A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262086A1.txt
  • Selected Financial Data Revenues $8,246 $30,537 $20,300 $2,407 $1,207 Costs and Expenses 6,325 40,625 15,011 1,653 908 Interest Expense 353 803 916 211 203 Other Income and Adjustments 1 43 (138) 2,177 4 4 Income Taxes 565 (4,560) 1,792 210 36 Net Income (Loss) 1,046 (6,469) 4,758 337 64 Earnings per Share 3.40 (8.14) 2.60 2.45 0.22 Dividends per Share 1.49 0.95 1.06 0.23 0 Average Shares Outstanding (millions) 307 795 1,832 137 245 Property, Plant and Equipment - Net 7,548 11,509 22,039 3,341 851 Total Assets 16,604 32,804 59,496 7,797 1,959 Long-Term Debt 5,352 8,779 15,108 2,762 2,111 Shareholders' Equity 7,129 7,019 23,066 3,410 (625) Operating Data Customer Lines (thousands) 2 3,009 - 21,356 2,314 970 Number of Employees 18,598
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • 751 New Mexico 240 103 137 0.74 30 139 New York 2,122 789 1,333 7.16 294 1,354 North Carolina 933 415 518 2.78 114 525 North Dakota 91 28 63 0.34 14 64 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA Ohio 1,018 446 572 3.07 126 581 Oklahoma 354 135 220 1.18 48 223 Oregon 447 169 278 1.49 61 282 Pennsylvania 1,381 587 795 4.27 175 807 Puerto Rico 219 105 114 0.61 25 116 Rhode Island 88 42 47 0.25 10 47 South Carolina 416 190 227 1.22 50 230 South Dakota 85 30 55 0.29 12 56 Tennessee 555 257 298 1.60 66 303 Texas 2,113 801 1,312 7.04 289 1,331 Utah 241 91 150 0.80
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A3.txt
  • 751 New Mexico 240 103 137 0.74 30 139 New York 2,122 789 1,333 7.16 294 1,354 North Carolina 933 415 518 2.78 114 525 North Dakota 91 28 63 0.34 14 64 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA Ohio 1,018 446 572 3.07 126 581 Oklahoma 354 135 220 1.18 48 223 Oregon 447 169 278 1.49 61 282 Pennsylvania 1,381 587 795 4.27 175 807 Puerto Rico 219 105 114 0.61 25 116 Rhode Island 88 42 47 0.25 10 47 South Carolina 416 190 227 1.22 50 230 South Dakota 85 30 55 0.29 12 56 Tennessee 555 257 298 1.60 66 303 Texas 2,113 801 1,312 7.04 289 1,331 Utah 241 91 150 0.80
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • 351213A A JORDAN SOLDIER VALLEY TELEPHONE COMPANY 1.83 -2.39 4.32 1.90 351214 C KALONA COOP. TEL. CO. 10.33 -2.48 13.14 39.93 351217 A KEYSTONE FRMS. COOP. TEL. CO. 1.56 -4.39 6.22 6.43 351220 A LA PORTE CITY TEL. CO. 11.96 -1.91 14.14 83.35 351222 A LA MOTTE TEL. CO. 18.89 4.85 13.39 67.14 351223 A LAUREL TEL. CO., INC. 3.90 -1.49 5.47 6.87 351225 A LEHIGH VALLEY COOP. TEL. ASSN. 11.07 0.15 10.91 37.38 351228 A LONE ROCK COOP. TEL. CO. -0.61 -5.26 4.92 0.82 351229 C LOST NATION-ELWOOD TEL. CO. -3.62 -1.71 -1.94 -9.30 351230 A NORTHEAST IOWA TEL. CO. 24.98 11.04 12.56 69.94 351232 A LYNNVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY 47.67 42.08 3.93 45.82 351235 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE CO.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A7.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A7.txt
  • Table 5.3 shows state-by-state disbursements by service speed. In some instances, such as with frame relay service, the service speed was not clearly identifiable. Whenever possible, the most likely speed for each service was assumed. For example, Frame Relay theoretically could be provided at voice grade speeds, but the vast majority of it is provided at broadband speeds (200K to 1.49Mb), so Frame Relay was assumed to be broadband at that level. Table 5.4 shows, for Funding Years 2002 and 2003, state-by-state disbursements from the Rural Health Care Support Mechanism, the population of the rural areas, and the disbursements per person in rural areas. 19 Universal Service Administrative Company, Federal Universal Service Support Mechanisms Fund Size Projections for the Third Quarter
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 1,441 2004 562 787 956 1,185 1,460 1980 2.61% 2.32% 2.18% 1.81% 1.51% 1981 2.96 2.52 2.24 1.95 1.55 1982 3.18 2.66 2.19 1.97 1.52 1983 3.13 2.82 2.24 2.02 1.55 1984 2.71 2.44 2.21 1.82 1.51 1985 2.72 2.41 2.20 1.81 1.39 1986 2.94 2.62 2.15 1.83 1.43 1987 3.24 2.57 2.31 1.85 1.44 1988 3.23 2.61 2.31 1.82 1.49 1989 3.05 2.61 2.30 1.88 1.43 1990 3.11 2.77 2.37 1.89 1.48 1991 3.08 2.80 2.28 1.84 1.45 1992 3.35 2.77 2.34 1.88 1.46 1993 3.27 2.70 2.45 1.96 1.53 1994 3.17 2.83 2.36 1.95 1.58 1995 3.38 2.71 2.41 1.99 1.55 1996 3.20 2.94 2.46 2.05 1.57 1997 3.24 3.02 2.53 2.09 1.63 1998 3.17 2.79 2.55 2.16 1.69
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • rounding. 1/ Excludes subscriber line charges. 2/ Totals in the first six columns include revenues for locations not estimated. (Dollars in Millions) 1 - 45 Table 1.17 Adjustment Formula: 2004 Average PercentAdjustment Formula Reporting 2/ 100/Average Percent 2004 2004 Reporting Alabama 2,275,897 90.1% 1.11 Alaska 414,396 0.0 NA American Samoa 10,872 0.0 NA Arizona 2,577,209 92.3 1.08 Arkansas 1,371,860 67.2 1.49 California 21,285,036 98.3 1.02 Colorado 2,606,818 95.0 1.05 Connecticut 2,135,021 98.9 1.01 Delaware 546,439 100.0 1.00 District of Columbia 791,292 100.0 1.00 Florida 10,356,878 98.1 1.02 Georgia 4,611,880 88.0 1.14 Guam 67,059 0.0 NA Hawaii 665,486 99.8 1.00 Idaho 714,999 90.5 1.11 Illinois 7,323,440 95.0 1.05 Indiana 3,492,042 95.4 1.05 Iowa 1,540,622 81.0 1.23 Kansas 1,380,168 82.7 1.21 Kentucky 2,003,264
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A3.txt
  • rounding. 1/ Excludes subscriber line charges. 2/ Totals in the first six columns include revenues for locations not estimated. (Dollars in Millions) 1 - 45 Table 1.17 Adjustment Formula: 2004 Average PercentAdjustment Formula Reporting 2/ 100/Average Percent 2004 2004 Reporting Alabama 2,275,897 90.1% 1.11 Alaska 414,396 0.0 NA American Samoa 10,872 0.0 NA Arizona 2,577,209 92.3 1.08 Arkansas 1,371,860 67.2 1.49 California 21,285,036 98.3 1.02 Colorado 2,606,818 95.0 1.05 Connecticut 2,135,021 98.9 1.01 Delaware 546,439 100.0 1.00 District of Columbia 791,292 100.0 1.00 Florida 10,356,878 98.1 1.02 Georgia 4,611,880 88.0 1.14 Guam 67,059 0.0 NA Hawaii 665,486 99.8 1.00 Idaho 714,999 90.5 1.11 Illinois 7,323,440 95.0 1.05 Indiana 3,492,042 95.4 1.05 Iowa 1,540,622 81.0 1.23 Kansas 1,380,168 82.7 1.21 Kentucky 2,003,264
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • 4.45 4.98 KENTUCKY -1.87 -3.96 2.17 -3.57 LOUISIANA -0.01 -5.02 5.27 -2.15 MAINE 1.10 -4.82 6.22 15.59 MARYLAND -0.77 -3.61 2.94 52.89 MASSACHUSETTS -1.46 -5.16 3.90 -59.52 MICHIGAN -2.05 -4.60 2.68 -1.32 MINNESOTA -1.63 -5.10 3.65 12.83 MISSISSIPPI 1.88 -3.48 5.55 5.94 MISSOURI -3.03 -4.12 1.13 1.29 MONTANA -0.16 -3.19 3.13 -9.75 NEBRASKA -0.66 -4.14 3.64 4.96 NEVADA -2.10 -3.54 1.49 9.52 NEW HAMPSHIRE 0.80 -3.82 4.80 -62.82 NEW JERSEY 0.27 -5.45 6.04 0.00 NEW MEXICO -2.04 -2.73 0.71 3.19 NEW YORK -32.56 -5.96 -28.28 10.23 NORTH CAROLINA -1.67 -5.06 3.57 -21.48 NORTH DAKOTA -1.06 -5.06 4.21 17.43 NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS 8.33 1.80 6.41 0.00 OHIO 0.32 -4.31 4.84 -17.47 OKLAHOMA -0.95 -5.15 4.43 -2.53 OREGON -3.32 -3.51 0.19 2.60 PENNSYLVANIA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A7.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A7.txt
  • service speed for Funding Years 2003 through 2005. In some instances, such as with frame relay service, the service speed was not clearly identifiable. Whenever possible, the most likely speed for each service was assumed. For example, Frame Relay theoretically could be provided at voice grade speeds, but the vast majority of it is provided at broadband speeds (200K to 1.49Mb), so Frame Relay was assumed to be broadband at that level. Table 5.4 shows, for Funding Years 2003 and 2004, state-by-state disbursements from the Rural Health Care Support Mechanism, the population of the rural areas, and the disbursements per person in rural areas. 19 Universal Service Administrative Company, Federal Universal Service Support Mechanisms Fund Size Projections for the Third Quarter
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • FCC. Table 19.14 Schools and Libraries Funding by State and by Type of Service (Funding Period: July 1, 2004 Through June 30, 2005 Activity Through December 31, 2005) 1 19 - 18 Table 19.15 Rural Health Care Fund Disbursements by Service Speed (Activity Through December 31, 2005) 1 56 kbps to 200 kbps to 1.5 Mbps Funding Period 199 kbps 1.49 Mbps and Faster Total Jan-98 to Jun-99 $202,778 $880,375 $2,292,252 $0 $3,375,405 Jul-99 to Jun-00 452,992 1,073,816 2,719,619 58,132 4,304,559 Jul-00 to Jun-01 613,595 3,015,004 6,685,573 0 10,314,172 Jul-01 to Jun-02 319,539 8,110,537 10,125,267 0 18,555,343 Jul-02 to Jun-03 423,756 10,639,476 10,405,314 0 21,468,545 Jul-03 to Jun-04 469,172 10,913,686 13,076,176 7,559 24,466,593 Jul-04 to Jun-05 518,231 6,657,441 13,555,208 459,502 21,190,382
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 1,002 2,311 4,637 7,476 12,113 4.07 Indiana 1,525 2,753 4,278 609 501 1,110 2,134 3,254 5,389 1.81 Iowa 749 1,267 2,016 331 282 614 1,080 1,550 2,630 0.88 Kansas 713 1,250 1,963 327 198 525 1,040 1,448 2,488 0.84 Kentucky 1,023 2,043 3,066 430 361 790 1,453 2,404 3,856 1.29 Louisiana 1,144 2,426 3,570 466 394 860 1,610 2,820 4,430 1.49 Maine 380 755 1,134 175 116 291 555 870 1,425 0.48 Maryland 1,842 3,286 5,128 788 524 1,313 2,630 3,811 6,441 2.16 Massachusetts 1,892 3,704 5,595 836 531 1,366 2,728 4,234 6,962 2.34 Michigan 2,338 4,955 7,293 888 908 1,796 3,225 5,864 9,089 3.05 Minnesota 1,294 2,358 3,652 577 401 977 1,871 2,759 4,629 1.55 Mississippi 726 1,539 2,265 318
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.txt
  • Verizon Southwest - Texas TX 37,041 28,005 97,703 263.77 AT&T - Southwestern Bell - Texas TX (915,127) (972,077) 12,360 (1.35) Embarq - United Telephone Company of Texas TX 5,978 4,539 5,966 99.80 Windstream/Valor Telecom. of Texas - Texas TX 5,284 3,798 3,055 57.82 Qwest - Utah UT 11,305 7,843 18,807 166.36 Verizon New England - Vermont VT (93,110) (93,805) (1,388) 1.49 Embarq - Central Telephone Company of Virginia VA 5,536 4,284 1,428 25.79 Verizon South - Contel/Virginia VA 5,587 4,136 13,553 242.58 Verizon Virginia VA (71,976) (97,360) 89,881 (124.88) Verizon South - Virginia VA 1,227 1,203 1,314 107.09 Embarq - United Telephone Co. - Southeast - Virginia VA 2,054 1,544 2,318 112.85 CenturyTel of Washington WA 3,606 2,568 1,866 51.75 Verizon
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A3.txt
  • 1,002 2,311 4,637 7,476 12,113 4.07 Indiana 1,525 2,753 4,278 609 501 1,110 2,134 3,254 5,389 1.81 Iowa 749 1,267 2,016 331 282 614 1,080 1,550 2,630 0.88 Kansas 713 1,250 1,963 327 198 525 1,040 1,448 2,488 0.84 Kentucky 1,023 2,043 3,066 430 361 790 1,453 2,404 3,856 1.29 Louisiana 1,144 2,426 3,570 466 394 860 1,610 2,820 4,430 1.49 Maine 380 755 1,134 175 116 291 555 870 1,425 0.48 Maryland 1,842 3,286 5,128 788 524 1,313 2,630 3,811 6,441 2.16 Massachusetts 1,892 3,704 5,595 836 531 1,366 2,728 4,234 6,962 2.34 Michigan 2,338 4,955 7,293 888 908 1,796 3,225 5,864 9,089 3.05 Minnesota 1,294 2,358 3,652 577 401 977 1,871 2,759 4,629 1.55 Mississippi 726 1,539 2,265 318
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • 0.23 0.00 367123 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF MN, LLC DBA FRONTIER MN -30.93 -2.69 -29.02 -100.00 TOTAL MISSISSIPPI 5.84 -5.81 12.37 12.70 280446 C BAY SPRINGS TEL. CO., INC. 14.27 -2.35 17.01 28.75 280447 C BRUCE TEL. CO.-MS -4.93 -3.24 -1.74 -10.50 280448 C CALHOUN CITY TEL. CO., INC. -2.72 -1.59 -1.15 -12.87 280451 A DECATUR TEL. CO., INC.-MS 1.49 -0.10 1.59 -27.02 280452 C DELTA TEL. CO., INC. -4.43 -1.08 -3.39 -10.81 280453 C WINDSTREAM MISSISSIPPI, INC. (ALLTEL) -3.77 -0.93 -2.87 -22.66 280454 C FRANKLIN TEL. CO., INC.-MS 1.15 0.37 0.78 -0.52 280455 C FULTON TEL. CO., INC. -5.03 -3.68 -1.41 -25.27 280456 C GEORGETOWN TELE. CO., INC. -9.01 -0.27 -8.77 -11.75 3 - 172 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A6.txt
  • 12.83 North Dakota 98,283 3,546,005 36.08 3,262,265 33.19 283,740 2.89 Northern Mariana Is. 11,718 1,154,104 98.49 885,051 75.53 269,053 22.96 Ohio 1,839,683 66,884,786 36.36 51,675,465 28.09 15,209,321 8.27 Oklahoma 634,739 50,644,635 79.79 28,407,619 44.75 22,237,016 35.03 Oregon 552,194 10,500,273 19.02 8,312,935 15.05 2,187,338 3.96 Pennsylvania 1,830,684 67,330,867 36.78 52,376,689 28.61 14,954,178 8.17 Puerto Rico 563,490 2,329,385 4.13 1,490,674 2.65 838,711 1.49 Rhode Island 153,422 5,156,960 33.61 4,101,148 26.73 1,055,812 6.88 South Carolina 701,544 42,186,482 60.13 27,628,738 39.38 14,557,744 20.75 South Dakota 122,012 5,532,819 45.35 4,462,145 36.57 1,070,674 8.78 Tennessee 953,928 53,252,424 55.82 42,491,861 44.54 10,760,563 11.28 Texas 4,525,394 219,009,161 48.40 140,614,639 31.07 78,394,522 17.32 Utah 508,430 15,598,354 30.68 11,604,928 22.83 3,993,426 7.85 Vermont 96,638 1,793,324 18.56 1,364,177 14.12 429,147 4.44 Virgin
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A7.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A7.txt
  • service speed for Funding Years 2004 through 2006. In some instances, such as with frame relay service, the service speed was not clearly identifiable. Whenever possible, the most likely speed for each service was assumed. For example, Frame Relay theoretically could be provided at voice grade speeds, but the vast majority of it is provided at broadband speeds (200K to 1.49Mb), so Frame Relay was assumed to be broadband at that level. http://www.universalservice.org/about/governance/fcc-filings/2007/ at 16. 18 Universal Service Administrative Company, Federal Universal Service Support Mechanisms Fund Size Projections for the Third Quarter 2007, at 16. 19 Universal Service Administrative Company, Federal Universal Service Support Mechanisms Fund Size Projections for the Third Quarter 2007 at 17. 20 See Table 5.2. 21 Universal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • 1,002 2,311 4,637 7,476 12,113 4.07 Indiana 1,525 2,753 4,278 609 501 1,110 2,134 3,254 5,389 1.81 Iowa 749 1,267 2,016 331 282 614 1,080 1,550 2,630 0.88 Kansas 713 1,250 1,963 327 198 525 1,040 1,448 2,488 0.84 Kentucky 1,023 2,043 3,066 430 361 790 1,453 2,404 3,856 1.29 Louisiana 1,144 2,426 3,570 466 394 860 1,610 2,820 4,430 1.49 Maine 380 755 1,134 175 116 291 555 870 1,425 0.48 Maryland 1,842 3,286 5,128 788 524 1,313 2,630 3,811 6,441 2.16 Massachusetts 1,892 3,704 5,595 836 531 1,366 2,728 4,234 6,962 2.34 Michigan 2,338 4,955 7,293 888 908 1,796 3,225 5,864 9,089 3.05 Minnesota 1,294 2,358 3,652 577 401 977 1,871 2,759 4,629 1.55 Mississippi 726 1,539 2,265 318
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • 1,532 2006 634 862 1,089 1,297 1,551 1980 2.61% 2.32% 2.18% 1.81% 1.51% 1981 2.96 2.52 2.24 1.95 1.55 1982 3.18 2.66 2.19 1.97 1.52 1983 3.13 2.82 2.24 2.02 1.55 1984 2.71 2.44 2.21 1.82 1.51 1985 2.72 2.41 2.20 1.81 1.39 1986 2.94 2.62 2.15 1.83 1.43 1987 3.24 2.57 2.31 1.85 1.44 1988 3.23 2.61 2.31 1.82 1.49 1989 3.05 2.61 2.30 1.88 1.43 1990 3.11 2.77 2.37 1.89 1.48 1991 3.08 2.80 2.28 1.84 1.45 1992 3.35 2.77 2.34 1.88 1.46 1993 3.27 2.70 2.45 1.96 1.53 1994 3.17 2.83 2.36 1.95 1.58 1995 3.38 2.71 2.41 1.99 1.55 1996 3.20 2.94 2.46 2.05 1.57 1997 3.24 3.02 2.53 2.09 1.63 1998 3.17 2.79 2.55 2.16 1.69
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • rounding. 1/ Excludes subscriber line charges. 2/ Totals in the first six columns include revenues for locations not estimated. (Dollars in Millions) 1 - 45 Table 1.17 Adjustment Formula: 2006 Average PercentAdjustment Formula Reporting 2/ 100/Average Percent 2006 2006 Reporting Alabama 2,085,906 89.6% 1.12 Alaska 369,991 0.0 NA American Samoa 10,746 0.0 NA Arizona 2,251,616 91.4 1.09 Arkansas 1,246,108 67.3 1.49 California 19,638,748 98.8 1.01 Colorado 2,301,366 94.7 1.06 Connecticut 1,854,403 98.8 1.01 Delaware 491,408 100.0 1.00 District of Columbia 724,194 100.0 1.00 Florida 9,214,613 98.0 1.02 Georgia 4,166,995 87.5 1.14 Guam 62,640 0.0 NA Hawaii 587,742 98.8 1.01 Idaho 673,389 90.2 1.11 Illinois 6,463,779 94.9 1.05 Indiana 3,071,465 95.2 1.05 Iowa 1,381,950 80.2 1.25 Kansas 1,191,789 81.6 1.23 Kentucky 1,811,672
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A3.pdf
  • rounding. 1/ Excludes subscriber line charges. 2/ Totals in the first six columns include revenues for locations not estimated. (Dollars in Millions) 1 - 45 Table 1.17 Adjustment Formula: 2006 Average PercentAdjustment Formula Reporting 2/ 100/Average Percent 2006 2006 Reporting Alabama 2,085,906 89.6% 1.12 Alaska 369,991 0.0 NA American Samoa 10,746 0.0 NA Arizona 2,251,616 91.4 1.09 Arkansas 1,246,108 67.3 1.49 California 19,638,748 98.8 1.01 Colorado 2,301,366 94.7 1.06 Connecticut 1,854,403 98.8 1.01 Delaware 491,408 100.0 1.00 District of Columbia 724,194 100.0 1.00 Florida 9,214,613 98.0 1.02 Georgia 4,166,995 87.5 1.14 Guam 62,640 0.0 NA Hawaii 587,742 98.8 1.01 Idaho 673,389 90.2 1.11 Illinois 6,463,779 94.9 1.05 Indiana 3,071,465 95.2 1.05 Iowa 1,381,950 80.2 1.25 Kansas 1,191,789 81.6 1.23 Kentucky 1,811,672
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • BELL 2.67 -4.87 7.92 0.00 TOTAL COLORADO -10.59 -6.98 -3.88 -0.80 461835 C SUNFLOWER TELEPHONE CO.,INC. - CO -6.55 -6.03 -0.55 -9.59 462178 C AGATE MUTUAL TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE ASSOC. 9.73 -8.00 19.28 14.05 462181 C BIJOU TEL COOPERATIVE ASSOC. INC 7.45 -1.97 9.60 13.77 462182 C BLANCA TELEPHONE CO. 7.98 -3.85 12.30 13.35 462184 C DELTA COUNTY TELE-COMM INC. -6.35 -1.49 -4.93 -60.71 462185 C CENTURYTEL OF EAGLE, INC. -2.16 -4.57 2.52 -2.80 462186 C EASTERN SLOPE RURAL TEL ASSN INC 2.43 -4.37 7.11 7.16 462187 C THE EL PASO COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY -3.16 -3.82 0.69 -15.51 462188 C FARMERS TEL CO, INC. - COLORADO 6.38 -3.96 10.76 10.60 462190 C HAXTUN TELEPHONE COMPANY -1.86 -1.91 0.06 -4.83 462192 C BIG
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A7.pdf
  • service speed for Funding Years 2005 through 2007. In some instances, such as with frame relay service, the service speed was not clearly identifiable. Whenever possible, the most likely speed for each service was assumed. For example, Frame Relay theoretically could be provided at voice grade speeds, but the vast majority of it is provided at broadband speeds (200K to 1.49Mb), so Frame Relay was assumed to be broadband at that level. Table 5.4 shows, for Funding Years 2005 and 2006, state-by-state disbursements from the Rural Health Care Support Mechanism, the population of the rural areas, and the disbursements per person in rural areas. 18 Universal Service Administrative Company, Federal Universal Service Support Mechanisms Fund Size Projections for the Third Quarter
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289172A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289172A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289172A1.txt
  • by the Commission's Numbering Resource Optimization Orders, carriers are returning large quantities of telephone numbers that they do not need to the NANPA so that those numbers can be assigned to other carriers with more immediate needs. In the second quarter of 2008, carriers returned 0.96 million telephone numbers to the NANPA. In the third quarter of 2008, carriers returned 1.49 million telephone numbers to the NANPA. Most Utilized Area Codes in the United States -New York's area code 646 (which is coincident with New York City's area code 212) is the most utilized, with 77.0% of numbers assigned to customers. Arizona's area code 480 is next, with 75.3% of numbers assigned to customers. (The above statistics exclude area code 947,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289173A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289173A1.txt
  • 96-98, 95-116, Fourth Report and Order in CC Docket No. 99-200 and CC Docket No. 95-116, and Fourth Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in CC Docket No. 99-200, 18 FCC Rcd 12472 (2003) (Fourth NRO Order). 3 In the second quarter of 2008, carriers returned 0.96 million telephone numbers to the NANPA. In the third quarter of 2008, carriers returned 1.49 million telephone numbers to the NANPA. Background The United States uses ten-digit telephone numbers, which are organized in accordance with the North American Numbering Plan (NANP).3 The NANP divides the country into separate geographic areas called numbering plan areas (NPAs), more commonly called area codes. Calls between these areas are generally dialed using the three-digit area code, followed by a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292562A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292562A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292562A1.txt
  • Veach Acting Chief Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX B Final Rules Part 1 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: PART 1 - PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE 1. The authority of part 1 is amended to read as follows: Authority: 15 U.S.C. 79 et seq.; 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(j), 160, 201, 225, and 303. 2. Section 1.49 is amended by adding paragraph (f)(1)(iv) to read as follows: � 1.49 Specifications as to pleadings and documents. (f)(1) (iv) Petition for forbearance proceedings. 3. Subpart A [Amended] Add undesignated center heading below � 1.52 to read as follows: Forbearance Proceedings 4. Add new �� 1.54 through 1.59 as follows: � 1.54 Petitions for forbearance must be complete as filed.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • rounding. 1/ Excludes subscriber line charges. 2/ Totals in the first six columns include revenues for locations not estimated. (Dollars in Millions) 1 - 47 Table 1.17 Adjustment Formula: 2007 Average PercentAdjustment Formula Reporting 2/ 100/Average Percent 2007 2007 Reporting Alabama 1,970,808 90.1% 1.11 Alaska 337,614 0.0 NA American Samoa 10,594 0.0 NA Arizona 2,076,125 92.1 1.09 Arkansas 1,162,844 67.1 1.49 California 18,406,883 98.3 1.02 Colorado 2,132,055 94.9 1.05 Connecticut 1,709,510 98.9 1.01 Delaware 444,456 100.0 1.00 District of Columbia 668,803 100.0 1.00 Florida 8,422,504 98.1 1.02 Georgia 3,875,280 87.9 1.14 Guam 62,004 0.0 NA Hawaii 543,734 99.8 1.00 Idaho 632,849 90.4 1.11 Illinois 6,000,648 95.0 1.05 Indiana 2,854,564 95.3 1.05 Iowa 1,291,940 81.0 1.23 Kansas 1,104,052 82.5 1.21 Kentucky 1,667,945
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.txt
  • rounding. 1/ Excludes subscriber line charges. 2/ Totals in the first six columns include revenues for locations not estimated. (Dollars in Millions) 1 - 47 Table 1.17 Adjustment Formula: 2007 Average PercentAdjustment Formula Reporting 2/ 100/Average Percent 2007 2007 Reporting Alabama 1,970,808 90.1% 1.11 Alaska 337,614 0.0 NA American Samoa 10,594 0.0 NA Arizona 2,076,125 92.1 1.09 Arkansas 1,162,844 67.1 1.49 California 18,406,883 98.3 1.02 Colorado 2,132,055 94.9 1.05 Connecticut 1,709,510 98.9 1.01 Delaware 444,456 100.0 1.00 District of Columbia 668,803 100.0 1.00 Florida 8,422,504 98.1 1.02 Georgia 3,875,280 87.9 1.14 Guam 62,004 0.0 NA Hawaii 543,734 99.8 1.00 Idaho 632,849 90.4 1.11 Illinois 6,000,648 95.0 1.05 Indiana 2,854,564 95.3 1.05 Iowa 1,291,940 81.0 1.23 Kansas 1,104,052 82.5 1.21 Kentucky 1,667,945
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.33 0.00 0.00 5.33 Rhode Island 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 South Carolina 1.27 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.89 0.42 0.23 3.86 South Dakota 5.83 0.31 0.01 0.33 0.00 4.84 0.02 1.70 13.03 Tennessee 0.33 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.61 0.23 0.15 1.37 Texas 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.26 0.11 1.49 Utah 0.38 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.17 0.28 1.49 Vermont 0.92 0.08 0.00 1.58 0.00 1.40 0.22 0.58 4.77 Virgin Islands 10.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.12 0.00 0.00 24.58 Virginia 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.88 0.08 1.15 Washington 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.62 (0.03) 0.13 1.21 West Virginia 0.49 0.00 0.00 1.68 0.00 0.19 1.12
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A7.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A7.txt
  • Fourth Quarter 2009 at 20. 25 Universal Service Administrative Company, Federal Universal Service Support Mechanisms Fund Size Projections for the Fourth Quarter 2009 at 21. 26 See Table 5.2. 27 Id.. 28 Universal Service Administrative Company, Federal Universal Service Support Mechanisms Fund Size Projections for the Fourth Quarter 2009 at 22. 5 - 5 provided at broadband speeds (200K to 1.49Mb), so Frame Relay was assumed to be broadband at that level. Table 5.4 shows, for Funding Years 2006 and 2007, state-by-state disbursements from the Rural Health Care Support Mechanism, the population of the rural areas, and the disbursements per person in rural areas. Table 5.1 Rural Health Care Funding Disbursements by Funding Year Voice Grade Broadband Other Service Funding 56K
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.txt
  • Libraries Funding by State and by Type of Service Funding Period: July 1, 2007 Through June 30, 2008 Activity Through June 30, 20091 (In Thousands of Dollars) 19 - 21 Table 19.15 Rural Health Care Fund Disbursements by Service Speed Activity Through June 30, 20091 Voice Grade Broadband Other Service Funding 56K to 200K to 1.5Mb or Speed Year 199K 1.49Mb and faster Unknown Total Jan-98 to Jun-99 $202,778 $880,375 $2,292,252 $0 $3,375,405 Jul-99 to Jun-00 452,992 1,073,816 2,719,619 58,132 4,304,559 Jul-00 to Jun-01 613,595 3,802,601 5,897,976 0 10,314,172 Jul-01 to Jun-02 319,539 13,256,841 4,978,963 0 18,555,343 Jul-02 to Jun-03 428,506 14,222,035 6,969,587 0 21,620,128 Jul-03 to Jun-04 477,657 15,917,701 9,469,267 7,559 25,872,184 Jul-04 to Jun-05 611,101 17,511,205 12,733,212 141,133 30,996,651
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
  • 9 0.01 Ohio 435 230 0 1,171 992 2,828 3.48 Oklahoma 123 82 0 351 299 855 1.05 Oregon 159 90 0 376 356 981 1.21 Pennsylvania 581 343 0 1,238 1,193 3,357 4.13 Puerto Rico 85 33 0 313 322 753 0.93 Rhode Island 31 50 0 109 77 267 0.33 South Carolina 201 74 0 447 484 1,206 1.49 South Dakota 31 22 0 76 80 209 0.26 Tennessee 273 118 0 725 607 1,722 2.12 Texas 835 369 1 2,552 1,898 5,656 6.97 Utah 89 42 0 256 218 606 0.75 Vermont 34 14 0 53 97 197 0.24 Virgin Islands 8 0 0 13 35 56 0.07 Virginia 378 224 0 781 899 2,283 2.81 Washington 273
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A3.txt
  • 9 0.01 Ohio 435 230 0 1,171 992 2,828 3.48 Oklahoma 123 82 0 351 299 855 1.05 Oregon 159 90 0 376 356 981 1.21 Pennsylvania 581 343 0 1,238 1,193 3,357 4.13 Puerto Rico 85 33 0 313 322 753 0.93 Rhode Island 31 50 0 109 77 267 0.33 South Carolina 201 74 0 447 484 1,206 1.49 South Dakota 31 22 0 76 80 209 0.26 Tennessee 273 118 0 725 607 1,722 2.12 Texas 835 369 1 2,552 1,898 5,656 6.97 Utah 89 42 0 256 218 606 0.75 Vermont 34 14 0 53 97 197 0.24 Virgin Islands 8 0 0 13 35 56 0.07 Virginia 378 224 0 781 899 2,283 2.81 Washington 273
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.txt
  • 0.42 0.03 0.00 0.18 0.00 1.22 0.00 0.60 2.46 MARYLAND 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.06 0.01 0.11 MASSACHUSETTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.04 0.02 0.07 MICHIGAN 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.01 0.18 1.09 MINNESOTA 1.26 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.84 0.13 0.55 3.88 MISSISSIPPI 1.04 0.04 0.00 5.71 0.00 0.62 0.62 0.15 8.17 MISSOURI 1.49 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.04 0.29 0.16 3.03 MONTANA 3.99 0.04 0.00 2.38 0.00 3.53 0.11 0.66 10.70 NEBRASKA 2.30 0.04 0.00 0.61 0.00 2.46 0.72 1.27 7.41 NEVADA 0.33 (0.00) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.34 0.67 0.32 1.66 NEW HAMPSHIRE 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.18 0.36 1.01 NEW JERSEY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.02
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A7.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A7.txt
  • Table 5.3 shows state-by-state disbursements by service speed. In some instances, such as with frame relay service, the service speed was not clearly identifiable. Whenever possible, the most likely speed for each service was assumed. For example, Frame Relay theoretically could be provided at voice grade speeds, but the vast majority of it is provided at broadband speeds (200K to 1.49Mb), so Frame Relay was assumed to be broadband at that level. Table 5.4 shows state-by-state disbursements from the Rural Health Care Support Mechanism, the population of the rural areas, and the disbursements per person in rural areas. 21 See Rural Health Care at http://www.usac.org/rhc/ . 22 Because of the appeals process, funding commitments and disbursements may be made after the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.txt
  • invoiced for Funding Year 2007. Universal Service Administrative Company, Federal Universal Service Support Mechanisms Fund Size Projections for the Fourth Quarter 2009 at 21. 22 See Rural Health Care Pilot Program at www.fcc.gov/encyclopedia/rural-health-care-pilot-program. Table 2.21 Rural Health Care Funding Disbursements by Funding Year Voice Grade Broadband Other Service Funding 56K to 200K to 1.5Mb to 4.0Mb or Speed Year 199K 1.49Mb 3.99Mb and faster Unknown Total 1998 $98,339 $201,476 $3,075,590 $0 $0 $3,375,405 1999 178,433 778,169 3,289,825 0 58,132 4,304,559 2000 242,640 451,643 9,559,894 59,994 0 10,314,172 2001 288,619 204,066 17,964,276 98,382 0 18,555,343 2002 406,711 146,886 20,492,887 573,644 0 21,620,128 2003 440,617 760,318 23,189,835 1,473,855 7,559 25,872,184 2004 570,681 2,741,730 25,265,034 2,283,207 141,133 31,001,784 2005 874,374 3,061,965 32,608,427 3,054,174 527,767
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313859A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313859A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313859A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313860A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313860A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313860A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314031A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314031A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314031A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314097A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314097A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314097A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314200A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314200A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314200A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314201A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314201A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314201A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314386A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314386A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314386A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314479A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314479A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314479A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314497A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314497A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314497A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314632A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314632A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314632A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314633A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314633A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314633A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314635A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314635A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314635A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314636A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314636A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314636A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314667A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314667A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314667A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314668A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314668A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314668A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314669A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314669A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314669A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314670A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314670A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314670A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314671A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314671A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314671A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314672A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314672A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314672A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314673A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314673A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314673A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314674A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314674A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314674A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314675A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314675A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314675A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314806A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314806A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314806A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314807A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314807A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314807A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314813A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314813A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314813A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-104A1.pdf
  • each filing. All filings must be sent to the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W. Room TW A325, Washington, D.C. 20554. 257. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules.606 We also direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, regardless of the length of their submission. 258. Parties who choose to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-186A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-186A1.txt
  • to ecfs@fcc.gov, and should include the following words in the body of the message, "get form ." A sample form and directions will be sent in reply. 34. Other requirements: Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with Section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules.47 We also direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. Comments and reply comments also must clearly identify the specific portion of this Notice to which a particular comment or set of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-244A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-244A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-244A1.txt
  • pleadings, referable in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's Copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Other requirements. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with Section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commissions rules. We also direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. Additional Information. For additional information on this proceeding, contact David Roberts at (202) 418-1600, Video Services Division, Mass Media Bureau, 445 Twelfth
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-264A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-264A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-264A1.txt
  • of Pennsylvania, John Powell, Project 25 Steering Committee, Safety Tech Industries, State of California, and State of Florida between November 12, 1998 and December 2, 1998, respectively, ARE GRANTED to the extent indicated herein and otherwise ARE DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i) and Sections 1.49 and 1.429 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.49 and 1.429, that Motorola's Motion for Leave to Extend Page Limit IS GRANTED and Maxon America, Inc. Reply Comment IS DENIED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), that the Consumer Information
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-297A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-297A1.txt
  • Washington, D.C. 20036. Comments and reply comments will be available for public inspection during regular business hours in the FCC Reference Center, Room CY-A257, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. 143. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules.287 We also direct all 286See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24,121 (1998). 287See 47 C.F.R. � 1.49. Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-297 61 interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-355A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-355A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-355A1.txt
  • one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. We also direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, regardless of the length of their submission. We also strongly encourage that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-361A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-361A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-361A1.txt
  • S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. Comments and reply comments will be available for public inspection during regular business hours in the FCC Reference Center, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with section 1.49, 47 C.F.R. � 1.49, and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. We also direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, regardless of the length of their submission. D.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-366A1_Erratum.pdf
  • agenciesontheinformationcollectionscontainedinthisFirstReportandOrderandFurtherNoticeof ProposedRulemaking,FifthReportandOrderandMemorandumOpinionandOrder,andFourthReport andOrderandMemorandumOpinionandOrderaredue60daysfromdateofpublicationoftheitemin theFederalRegister.Commentsshouldaddress:(a)whetherthecollectionofinformationisnecessary fortheproperperformanceofthefunctionsoftheCommission,includingwhethertheinformationshall havepracticalutility;(b)theaccuracyoftheCommission'sburdenestimates;(c)waystoenhancethe quality,utility,andclarityoftheinformationcollected;and(d)waystominimizetheburdenofthe collectionofinformationontherespondents,includingtheuseofautomatedcollectiontechniquesor otherformsofinformationtechnology. 179. ExParteRules.ThisFirstReportandOrderandFurtherNoticeofProposed Rulemaking,FifthReportandOrderandMemorandumOpinionandOrder,andFourthReportandOrder andMemorandumOpinionandOrderconstitutea"permit-but-disclose"proceedinginaccordancewith theCommission'sexparterules.389PersonsmakingoralexpartepresentationsrelatingtotheFirst ReportandOrderandFurtherNoticeofProposedRulemaking,FifthReportandOrderand MemorandumOpinionandOrder,andFourthReportandOrderandMemorandumOpinionandOrder areremindedthatmemorandasummarizingthepresentationsmustcontainsummariesofthesubstanceof thepresentationsandnotmerelyalistingofthesubjectsdiscussed.Morethanaoneortwosentence descriptionoftheviewsandargumentspresentedisgenerallyrequired.390Otherrulespertainingtooral andwrittenpresentationsaresetforthinSection1.1206(b)aswell.Interestedpartiesaretofilewiththe Secretary,FCC,andserveInternationalTranscriptionServices(ITS)withcopiesofanywrittenexparte presentationsorsummariesoforalexpartepresentationsintheseproceedingsinthemannerspecified belowforfilingcomments. 180. FilingProcedures.PursuanttoSections1.415and1.419oftheCommission'srules,47 C.F.R.��1.415and1.419,interestedpartiesmayfilecommentsonorbeforeDecember22,2000,and replycommentsonorbeforeJanuary22,2001.CommentsmaybefiledusingtheCommission's ElectronicCommentFilingSystem(ECFS)orbyfilingpapercopies.SeeElectronicFilingof DocumentsinRulemakingProceedings,63Fed.Reg.24,121(1998). 181. CommentsfiledthroughtheECFScanbesentasanelectronicfileviatheInternetto http://www.fcc.gov/e-file/ecfs.html.Generally,onlyonecopyofanelectronicsubmissionmustbefiled. Incompletingthetransmittalscreen,commentersshouldincludetheirfullname,PostalServicemailing address,andtheapplicabledocketorrulemakingnumber.Partiesmayalsosubmitanelectronic commentbyInternete-mail.Togetfilinginstructionsfore-mailcomments,commentersshouldsendan e-mailtoecfs@fcc.gov,andshouldincludethefollowingwordsinthebodyofthemessage,"getform ."Asampleformanddirectionswillbesentinreply.Partieswhochoosetofile bypapermustfileanoriginalandfourcopiesofeachfiling.Allfilingsmustbesenttothe Commission'sSecretary,MagalieRomanSalas,OfficeoftheSecretary,FederalCommunications Commission,445TwelfthStreet,S.W.,TW-A325,Washington,D.C.20554. 182. Regardlessofwhetherpartieschoosetofileelectronicallyorbypaper,partiesshould alsofileonecopyofanydocumentsfiledinthisdocketwiththeCommission'scopycontractor, InternationalTranscriptionServices,Inc.,445TwelfthStreet,S.W.,RoomCY-B402,Washington,D.C. 389 SeeAmendmentof47C.F.R. �1.1200etseq.ConcerningExPartePresentationsinCommissionProceedings,GC DocketNo.95-21, ReportandOrder,12FCCRcd7348,7356-57,'\l27,citing47C.F.R. �1.1204(b)(1)(1997). 390 See47C.F.R. �1.1206(b)(2),asrevised. 23059 Federal 20554.Commentsandreplycommentswillbeavailableforpublicinspectionduringregularbusiness hoursintheFCCReferenceCenter,44512thStreet,S.W.,Washington,D.C.20554. 183. Commentsandreplycommentsmustincludeashortandconcisesummaryofthe substantiveargumentsraisedinthepleading.Commentsandreplycommentsmustalsocomplywith Section1.49,47C.F.R.�1.49,andallotherapplicablesectionsoftheCommission'sRules.Wealso directallinterestedpartiestoincludethenameofthefilingpartyandthedateofthefilingoneachpage oftheircommentsandreplycomments.Allpartiesareencouragedtoutilizeatableofcontents, regardlessofthelengthoftheirsubmission. 184. Writtencommentsbythepublic,OMB,orotheragenciesontheinformationcollections aredueonorbefore60daysafterthedateofpublicationintheFederalRegister.Inadditiontofiling conunentswiththeSecretary,acopyofanycommentsontheinformationcollectionscontainedherein shouldbesubmittedtoJudyBoley,FederalCommunicationsCommission,Room1-C804,44512th Street,SW,Washington,DC20554,orviatheInternettojboley@fcc.govandtoEdwardSpringer, OMBDeskOfficer,Room10236NEOB,72517thStreet,N.W.,Washington,DC20503orviathe Internettoedward.springer@omb.eop.gov. 185. FurtherInformation. Forfurtherinformationaboutthisproceeding,contactJoel Taubenblattat202-418-1513,jtaubenb@fcc.gov,orLaurenVanWazerat202-418-0030, lvanwaze@fcc.gov. YIn.ORDERINGCLAUSES 186. Accordingly,ITISORDERED,pursuanttoSections1,2(a),4(j),4(i),7,201,202,205, 221,224,251,303,and405oftheCommunicationsActof1934,asamended,47U.S.c.��151,152(a), 154(i),154(j),157,201,202,205,221,224,251,303,and405,thatthisFirstReportandOrderand FurtherNoticeofProposedRulemakinginWTDocketNo.99-217,FifthReportandOrderand MemorandumOpinionandOrderinCCDocketNo.96-98,andFourthReportandOrderand MemorandumOpinionandOrderinCCDocketNo.88-57andtheamendmentstotheCommission's rulessetforthinAppendixBareADOPTED.. 187. ITISFURTHERORDEREDthatnewSections64.2500,64.2501,and64.2502ofthe Commission'srules,47C.F.R.��64.2500,64.2501,and64.2502,setforthinAppendixB,SHALL BECOMEEFFECTIVE60daysafterpublicationintheFederalRegister. 188. ITISFURTHERORDEREDthattherevisionstoSection1.4000oftheCommission's rules,47C.F.R.�1.4000,setforthinAppendixB,andtherevisionstoSection68.3oftheCommission's rules,47C.F.R.�68.3,setforthinAppendixB,SHALLBECOMEEFFECTIVE120daysafter publicationintheFederalRegister,pendingOMBapproval. 189. ITISFURTHERORDEREDthatthemotionstosubmitFurtherReplyCommentsfiled byConcernedCommunitiesandOrganizationsandtheWirelessCommunicationsAssociation InternationalAREGRANTED. 190. ITISFURTHERORDEREDthatthePetitionforClarificationandReconsiderationof the1997DemarcationPointOrderfiledbyBellAtlanticISGRANTED,asdiscussedinSectionIV.C. 191. ITISFURTHERORDEREDthatthePetitionforClarificationandReconsiderationof the1997DemarcationPointOrderfiledbyBellSouthISDENIED,asdiscussedinSectionIV.C. 23060 FederalCommunicationsCommission FCC00-366 192. ITISFURTHERORDEREDthatthePetitionforReconsiderationoftheLocal CompetitionFirstReportandOrderfiledbyWinStarISGRANTEDtotheextentdiscussedinSection N.DandotherwiseISDENIED. 193. ITISFURTHERORDEREDthatthePetitionforEnvironmentalImpactStatementfiled bytheNationalLeagueofCities,theNationalAssociationofCounties,theMichiganMunicipalLeague, andtheTexasCoalitionofCitiesforUtilityIssuesISDENIEDasdiscussedinSectionIV.E,exceptto theextentthatthePetitionconcernsissuesraisedintheNoticeofInquiryportionoftheCompetitive NetworksNPRM,whichwillbeaddressedseparatelyatalatertime. 194. ITISFURTHERORDEREDthattheCommission'sConsumerInformationBureau, ReferenceInformationCenter,SHALLSENDacopyofthisFirstReportandOrderandFurtherNotice
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-367A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-367A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-367A1.txt
  • Copies also can be obtained from International Transcription Services, Inc. at 1231 20th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20036, or by calling ITS at (202) 857-3800 or by faxing ITS at (202) 857-3805. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with Section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments length of their submission. We also strongly encourage that parties track the organization set forth in this Notice in order to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-408A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-408A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-408A1.txt
  • at 22974. See Amendment of 47 C.F.R. �1.1200 et seq. Concerning Ex Parte Presentations in Commission Proceedings, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 18831, 18838-39, � 29 (1999) (Ex Parte Order). Id. See, e.g., Ameritech Comments at 7; CCO Comments at 30-31; NATOA Reply at 17; Vermont Environmental Board Comments at 13. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. �� 1.45 - 1.49 (filing procedures) and 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(a)(3) (permit-but-disclose ex parte status). 47 C.F.R. � 1.45(b). See NATOA Reply at 17-18; PCIA Comments at 10; US West Comments at 22; see also CCO Comments at 30-31 (45 days). See NATOA Reply at 18. Some commenters further contend that State and local governments will have to hire outside counsel in Washington, D.C.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-429A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-429A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-429A1.txt
  • of each filing. All filings must be sent to the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W. Room TW A325, Washington, D.C. 20554. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. We also direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, regardless of the length of their submission. Parties who choose to file
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-132A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-132A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-132A1.txt
  • one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. We also direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, regardless of the length of their submission. We also strongly encourage that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-146A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-146A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-146A1.txt
  • docket number, CC Docket No. 96-262), type of pleading (comment or reply comment), date of submission, and the name of the electronic file on the diskette. The label should also include the following phrase: "Disk Copy-Not an Original." Each diskette should contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. Comments and reply comments must comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. We also direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. This proceeding will continue to be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-205A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-205A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-205A1.txt
  • N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036. Comments and reply comments will be available for public inspection during regular business hours in the FCC Reference Center, Room CY-A257, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. We direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, regardless of the length of their submission. We also strongly encourage that parties
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.txt
  • OSS Maintenance Interface Response Times MR-1-01 Create Trouble 6.67 5.39 6.97 5.72 6.61 6.42 6.57 6.79 MR-1-02 Status Trouble 4.52 2.38 4.63 2.78 4.60 3.34 4.62 3.83 MR-1-03 Modify Trouble 6.67 5.26 6.97 5.94 6.61 6.33 6.57 6.40 1c,2b,3c,4c MR-1-04 Request Cancellation of Trouble 7.80 6.25 8.12 6.51 7.79 8.08 7.75 7.50 MR-1-05 Trouble Report History (by TN/Circuit) 0.82 1.02 1.49 2.04 1.10 2.74 0.57 3.42 MR-1-06 Test Trouble (POTS Only) 58.24 57.97 57.23 49.32 57.60 49.36 57.74 48.51 Change Management, Billing, OS/DA Change Management Notices PO-4-01 % Notices Sent on Time - Emergency Maint. 100 100 100 100 1a,2a,3a,4a PO-4-01 % Notices Sent on Time - Regulatory NA NA NA 100 4b PO-4-01 % Notices Sent on Time - Industry
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A3.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A3.txt
  • OSS Maintenance Interface Response Times MR-1-01 Create Trouble 6.67 5.39 6.97 5.72 6.61 6.42 6.57 6.79 MR-1-02 Status Trouble 4.52 2.38 4.63 2.78 4.60 3.34 4.62 3.83 MR-1-03 Modify Trouble 6.67 5.26 6.97 5.94 6.61 6.33 6.57 6.40 1c,2b,3c,4c MR-1-04 Request Cancellation of Trouble 7.80 6.25 8.12 6.51 7.79 8.08 7.75 7.50 MR-1-05 Trouble Report History (by TN/Circuit) 0.82 1.02 1.49 2.04 1.10 2.74 0.57 3.42 MR-1-06 Test Trouble (POTS Only) 58.24 57.97 57.23 49.32 57.60 49.36 57.74 48.51 Change Management, Billing, OS/DA Change Management Notices PO-4-01 % Notices Sent on Time - Emergency Maint. 100 100 100 100 1a,2a,3a,4a PO-4-01 % Notices Sent on Time - Regulatory NA NA NA 100 4b PO-4-01 % Notices Sent on Time - Industry
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-247A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-247A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-247A1.txt
  • Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554.Comments and reply comments will be available for public inspection during regular business hours in the FCC Reference Center, Room CY-A257, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with Section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. We also direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, regardless of the length of their submission. We also strongly encourage that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-26A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-26A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-26A1.txt
  • N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036. Comments and reply comments will be available for public inspection during regular business hours in the FCC Reference Center, Room CY-A257, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. We also direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, regardless of the length of their submission. We also strongly encourage that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-331A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-331A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-331A1.txt
  • and for the competing carrier, e.g., a difference greater than three standard deviations might be considered an extreme difference. We seek comment on these and other criteria. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.200 et seq. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(2). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.415, 1.419. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24121 (1998). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.49. 5 U.S.C. � 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. � 601 et seq., has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). See 5 U.S.C. � 603(a). Id. Id., �� 603(b)(3), 604(a)(3). Id., � 601(3). Id., � 632. Id., � 601(3). Letter from Jere W.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-339A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-339A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-339A1.txt
  • UNE Measurements and Standards Notice, paras. 89- 91. We note, however, that the requirements set forth in section 272(e) do not sunset. See 47 U.S.C. � 272(f)(2). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.200 et seq. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(2). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.415, 1.419. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24121 (1998). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.49. 5 U.S.C. � 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. � 601 et seq., has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). See 5 U.S.C. � 603(a). Id. Id., �� 603(b)(3), 604(a)(3). Id., � 601(3). Id., � 632. Id., � 601(3). Letter from Jere W.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-384A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-384A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-384A1.txt
  • . Alternative formats (computer diskette, large print, audio cassette and Braille) are available to persons with disabilities by contacting Brian Millin at (202) 418-7426, TTY (202) 418-7365, or at bmillin@fcc.gov. Other requirements. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commissions rules. We also direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. Comments and reply comments also must clearly identify the specific portion of this Notice to which a particular comment or set of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-89A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-89A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-89A1.txt
  • available to persons with disabilities by contacting Martha Contee at (202) 418-0260, TTY (202) 418-2555, or at mcontee@fcc.gov, or Ruth Dancey at (202) 418-0305, TTY (202) 418-2970, or at rdancey@fcc.gov. Other requirements. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commissions rules. We also direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. Comments and reply comments also must clearly identify the specific portion of this Second Further Notice to which a particular comment or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-101A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-101A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-101A1.txt
  • Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. Finally, we request that a courtesy copy be filed with Shellie Blakeney, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Room 3-A223, Federal Communications Commission. 53. Other requirements. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with Section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commissions rules. We also direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. 54. Parties who choose to file by paper should also submit their comments on diskette. Parties should submit diskettes to Jonathan Levy,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.txt
  • not required to be accompanied by a fee and which are hand-delivered must be tendered for filing in complete form, as directed by the Rules, with the Office of the Secretary before 7:00 p.m., at 445 12th Street, SW, TW-A325, Washington, DC. The Secretary will determine whether a tendered document meets the pre-7:00 p.m. deadline. Documents filed electronically pursuant to �1.49(f) must be received by the Commission's electronic filing system before midnight. Applications, attachments and pleadings filed electronically in the Universal Licensing System (ULS) pursuant to �1.939(b) must be received before midnight on the filing date. Media Bureau applications and reports filed electronically pursuant to �73.3500 of this chapter must be received by the electronic filing system before midnight on the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-182A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-182A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-182A1.txt
  • R. Nordrehaug, counsel for Complainants, Blumenthal Ostroff & Markham, dated December 7, 2000 (stating, for example, that the complaint fails to comply with section 1.721(a)(12) which requires that each copy of the complaint filed with the Commission contain a Formal Complaint Intake Form and that the complaint does not include a summary or table of contents as required by section 1.49(b)-(c)). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.728(a). Amended Formal Complaint at 1. Id. Id. MCI WorldCom Answer at 17. See American Message Centers v. FCC, 50 F.3d 35, 41 (D.C. Cir. 1995) (citing Amendment of Rules Governing Procedures to be Followed Where Formal Complaints are Filed Against Common Carriers, Report and Order, 3 FCC Rcd 1806, 1806, � 8 (1988)); see also
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-252A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-252A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-252A1.txt
  • 22298 � 5. Order on Reconsideration, 16 FCC Rcd at 9337 � 1. Id. at 9339 � 5. Id. at 9340 � 8. Order on Further Reconsideration, 16 FCC Rcd at 19240. Id. at 19242 � 6. Id. at 19242-43 � 7. Id. at 19243 � 8. Id. Regionet argues that Havens's application for review did not comply with Section 1.49(c) of the Commission's Rules and therefore, should be dismissed. Opposition at 1-2. Specifically, Regionet refers to the summary section of the application for review where Havens states that a full summary of the item is provided by the section headings listed in the table of contents. Application for Review at 2. As Regionet indicates, see Opposition at 1-4, such a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-285A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-285A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-285A1.txt
  • paper to each of the following: ; facsimile: (202) 863-2898; phone (202) 863-2893. James Ball, Chief, Policy Division, International Bureau, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554; e-mail: JBall@fcc.gov. . . . Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with Section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments' length of their submission. We also strongly encourage that parties track the organization set forth in this Notice in order to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.txt
  • 6.00 4.31 6.00 2.31 6.00 3.02 6.00a 2 - 203300Elct Man-Resale DS1/ISDN-PRI 16.03 6.00 5.55 6.00 5.15 6.00 6.00 6.00abcde 2 - 203500Elct Man-Resale VGPL/DS0 6.00 7.02 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00abcde 2 - 203601Elct Man-8.0 dB and 5.5 dB Loop 2.24 6.00 1.89 6.00 1.96 6.00 2.33 6.00 2.15 6.00 2 - 203800Elct Man-2 Digital ISDN 1.50 6.00 2.24 6.00 1.49 6.00 1.77 6.00 2.03 6.00 2 - 203900Elct Man-2 Digital xDSL 1.85 6.00 2.00 6.00 1.85 6.00 2.07 6.00 2.50 6.00 2 - 204000Elct Man-4 Digital 1.544 mbpd HDSL 1.91 6.00 1.84 6.00 1.93 6.00 1.97 6.00 1.86 6.00 2 - 204001Elct Man-4 Digital DS3 Loop 1.74 6.00 6.00 2.53 6.00 2.80 6.00 5.02 6.00abcde 2 - 204003Elct Man- UNE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.txt
  • 21.31 45.60 1 B.2.1.3.1.1Loop + Port Combinations/<10 circuits/Dispatch/TN (days) 4.75 2.96 5.57 3.09 5.72 3.14 6.01 2.87 5.92 2.98 B.2.1.3.1.2Loop + Port Combinations/<10 circuits/Non-Dispatch/TN (days) 0.90 0.64 0.89 0.67 0.91 0.70 0.91 0.94 1.10 0.83 B.2.1.3.1.3Loop + Port Combinations/<10 circuits/Switch Based Orders/TN (days) 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 B.2.1.3.1.4Loop + Port Combinations/<10 circuits/Dispatch In/TN (days) 1.49 1.25 1.46 1.29 1.51 1.33 1.50 1.49 1.80 1.43 B.2.1.3.2.1Loop + Port Combinations/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/TN (days) 11.74 3.50 21.18 2.67 9.77 0.33 13.56 4.50 12.66 3.00 1,2,3,4,5 B.2.1.3.2.2Loop + Port Combinations/>=10 circuits/Non-Dispatch/TN (days) 4.49 3.00 6.44 6.08 7.01 4.00 7.18 1,4 B.2.1.3.2.4Loop + Port Combinations/>=10 circuits/Dispatch In/TN (days) 5.47 3.00 10.05 7.76 8.84 4.00 9.62 1,4 B.2.1.4.1.1Combo Other/<10 circuits/Dispatch/TN (days) 5.91
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-41A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-41A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-41A1.txt
  • This document may also be purchased from the Commission's duplicating contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-B402, Washington, DC, 20554, telephone 202-863-2893, facsimile 202-863-2898, or via e-mail qualexint@aol.com. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. We direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, regardless of the length of their submission. We also strongly encourage parties to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-57A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-57A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-57A1.txt
  • 20554. They may also be purchased from the Commission's duplicating contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-B402, Washington, DC, 20554, telephone 202-863-2893, facsimile 202-863-2898, or via e-mail qualexint@aol.com. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. We also direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, regardless of the length of their submission. We also strongly encourage that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-63A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-63A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-63A1.txt
  • of Service > 24 Hours 23.1 NA 20 NA 44.44 NA 28 NA 8.33 NA MR-5 - Repeat Trouble Reports MR-5-01-3343 % Repeat Reports within 30 Days 30.8 NA 45.45 NA 33.33 NA 61.54 NA 33.33 NA Special Services - Maintenance MR-2 - Trouble Report Rate MR-2-01-3200 Network Trouble Report Rate 0.29 1.55 0.29 3.31 0.2 0.93 0.27 1.52 0.23 1.49 MR-2-05-3200 % CPE/TOK/FOK Trouble Report Rate 0.44 1.55 0.34 2.26 0.24 1.24 0.33 3.03 0.33 1.34 MR-4 - Trouble Duration Intervals MR-4-01-3200 Mean Time To Repair - Total 5.5 10.35 5.39 5.77 5.44 6.64 5.04 6.75 4.99 5.95 3 MR-4-04-3200 % Cleared (all troubles) within 24 Hours 98.2 90 100 100 99.1 100 98.64 100 100 100 3 MR-4-06-3200 %
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-63A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-63A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-63A2.txt
  • of Service > 24 Hours 28 16.7 30 50 25 5.88 26 0 25 20 1,2,4,5 MR-5 - Repeat Trouble Reports MR-5-01-3343 % Repeat Reports within 30 Days 47 42.9 44 100 46 17.65 52 14.29 56 20 1,2,4,5 Special Services - Maintenance MR-2 - Trouble Report Rate MR-2-01-3200 Network Trouble Report Rate 0.3 1.21 0.3 1.89 0.2 1.45 0.2 1.49 0.2 1.62 MR-2-05-3200 % CPE/TOK/FOK Trouble Report Rate 0.4 2.11 0.4 2.84 0.3 1.94 0.3 2.66 0.3 2.63 MR-4 - Trouble Duration Intervals MR-4-01-3200 Mean Time To Repair - Total 8.2 7.82 7.1 7.01 6.9 7.23 7.8 7.45 5 MR-4-04-3200 % Cleared (all troubles) within 24 Hours 95 100 97 97 98 98 97 100 5 MR-4-06-3200 % Out of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-73A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-73A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-73A1.txt
  • . Alternative formats (computer diskette, large print, audio cassette and Braille) are available to persons with disabilities by contacting Brian Millin at (202) 418-7426, TTY (202) 418-7365, or at bmillin@fcc.gov. Other requirements. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commissions rules. We also direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. Comments and reply comments also must clearly identify the specific portion of this Further Notice to which a particular comment or set
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-101A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-101A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-101A1.txt
  • This document may also be purchased from the Commission's duplicating contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-B402, Washington, DC, 20554, telephone 202-863-2893, facsimile 202-863-2898, or via e-mail qualexint@aol.com. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. We direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, regardless of the length of their submission. We also strongly encourage parties to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-120A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-120A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-120A1.txt
  • This document may also be purchased from the Commission's duplicating contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-B402, Washington, DC, 20554, telephone 202-863-2893, facsimile 202-863-2898, or via e-mail qualexint@aol.com. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. We direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, regardless of the length of their submission. We also strongly encourage parties to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-13A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-13A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-13A1.txt
  • This document may also be purchased from the Commission's duplicating contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-B402, Washington, DC, 20554, telephone 202-863-2893, facsimile 202-863-2898, or via e-mail qualexint@aol.com. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. We direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, regardless of the length of their submission. We also strongly encourage parties to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-286A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-286A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-286A1.txt
  • hours in the FCC Reference Information Center, Room CY-A257, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554 and through the Commission's Electronic Filing System (ECFS) accessible on the Commission's World Wide Website, www.fcc.gov. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with Section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments' length of their submission. We also strongly encourage that parties track the organization set forth in this Notice in order to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-323A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-323A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-323A1.txt
  • document may also be purchased from the Commission's duplicating contractor, Qualex International, Inc., Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-B402, Washington, DC, 20554, telephone 202-863-2893, facsimile 202-863-2898, or via e-mail qualexint@aol.com. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. We direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, regardless of the length of their submission. We also strongly encourage parties to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-337A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-337A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-337A1.txt
  • This document may also be purchased from the Commission's duplicating contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554, telephone 202-863-2893, facsimile 202-863-2898, or via e-mail qualexint@aol.com. Comments and reply comments should include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments also must comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. Parties should include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, regardless of the length of their submission. We also strongly encourage parties to track the organization set
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-55A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-55A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-55A1.txt
  • multiple amendments or modifications that individually would be considered minor changes, but that, cumulatively, might constitute a major change. We received no comments on this issue and, upon further consideration, we do not anticipate that cumulative minor amendments or changes will be a significant issue. Therefore, cumulative minor amendments or changes will not become major amendments or changes. Currently, Section 1.49 of our rules allows pleadings and documents filed in most Commission proceedings to be filed electronically. Once COALS is implemented, we intend to enhance COALS to allow pleadings and informal requests for Commission actions associated with CARS applications or licenses to be filed electronically. Such pleadings include petitions to deny, petitions for reconsideration, applications for review, comments, motions for extension
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-133A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-133A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-133A1.txt
  • International Bureau, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554; e-mail: John.Copes@ fcc.gov. (7) Peggy Reitzel, Telecommunications Specialist, Policy Division, International Bureau, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554; e-mail: Peggy.Reitzel@fcc.gov. . . Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. All parties are encouraged to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments' length of their submission. We also strongly encourage that parties track the organization set forth in this International E-Filing NPRM in order to facilitate our internal review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-294A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-294A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-294A1.txt
  • spectrum, $1.49 per MHz-pop for interleaved spectrum), yielding the results in the table below: MHz POPs Value MHz POP Actual Value NPSPAC Spectrum 6.00 285,620,445 $ 1.70 $2,913,328,539 Restricted Use (0.5) 285,620,445 $ 1.70 ($242,777,378) Guard Band (2.00) 247,051,622 $ 1.70 ($839,975,515) Nextel Upper Channel Gain 3.50 1,831,000,000 General Category (4.51) 285,620,445 $ 1.70 ($2,188,000,000) SMR Interleaved (2.96) 285,620,445 $ 1.49 ($1,258,000,000) B/ILT Interleaved (1.04) 285,620,445 $ 1.49 ($444,000,000) Total Nextel Loss (5.01) ($2,059,000,000) Based on the above analysis, Nextel proposed that its credit for 800 MHz spectrum be increased by $452 million rather than the $738 million originally requested, for a total credit of $2.059 billion. We have carefully reviewed the Nextel analysis and the comments that parties have filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-294A1_Erratum.doc
  • spectrum, $1.49 per MHz-pop for interleaved spectrum), yielding the results in the table below: MHz POPs Value MHz POP Actual Value NPSPAC Spectrum 6.00 285,620,445 $ 1.70 $2,913,328,539 Restricted Use (0.5) 285,620,445 $ 1.70 ($242,777,378) Guard Band (2.00) 247,051,622 $ 1.70 ($839,975,515) Nextel Upper Channel Gain 3.50 1,831,000,000 General Category (4.51) 285,620,445 $ 1.70 ($2,188,000,000) SMR Interleaved (2.96) 285,620,445 $ 1.49 ($1,258,000,000) B/ILT Interleaved (1.04) 285,620,445 $ 1.49 ($444,000,000) Total Nextel Loss (5.01) ($2,059,000,000) Based on the above analysis, Nextel proposed that its credit for 800 MHz spectrum be increased by $452 million rather than the $738 million originally requested, for a total credit of $2.059 billion. We have carefully reviewed the Nextel analysis and the comments that parties have filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-40A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-40A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-40A1.txt
  • single electronic file. All parties must file one copy of each pleading electronically or by paper to each of the following: ; facsimile: (202) 863-2898; phone (202) 863-2893. . . . . Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments' length of their submission. We also strongly encourage that parties track the organization set forth in this Notice in order to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-70A1.txt
  • the FCC Reference Information Center, Room CY- A257, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554 and through the Commission's Electronic Filing System (ECFS) accessible on the Commission's World Wide Website, www.fcc.gov. 90. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules.155 All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, to include the name of the filing party and the date of 155 47 C.F.R. � 1.49. Federal Communications Commission FCC 04-70 34 the filing on each page of their comments' length of their submission. We also strongly encourage that parties
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-119A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-119A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-119A1.txt
  • receipts. The Commission has certified 25 OVS operators with some now providing service. Broadband service providers (BSPs) are currently the only significant holders of OVS certifications or local OVS franchises, even though OVS is one of four statutorily-recognized options for local exchange carriers (LECs) to offer video programming services. As of June 2003, BSPs served approximately 1.4 million subscribers, representing 1.49 percent of all MVPD households. Among BSPs, however, those operating under the OVS framework are in the minority, with approximately eight percent operating with an OVS certification. Serving approximately 460,000 of these subscribers, Affiliates of Residential Communications Network, Inc. (``RCN'') is currently the largest BSP and 11th largest MVPD. RCN received approval to operate OVS systems in New York City,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-14A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-14A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-14A1.txt
  • hours in the FCC Reference Information Center, Room CY-A257, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554 and through the Commission's Electronic Filing System (ECFS) accessible on the Commission's World Wide Website, www.fcc.gov. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with Section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, and to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their submission. We also strongly encourage that parties track the organization set forth in this Notice in order to facilitate our internal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-14A1_Erratum.doc
  • hours in the FCC Reference Information Center, Room CY-A257, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554 and through the Commission's Electronic Filing System (ECFS) accessible on the Commission's World Wide Website, www.fcc.gov. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with Section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, and to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their submission. We also strongly encourage that parties track the organization set forth in this Notice in order to facilitate our internal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-192A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-192A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-192A1.txt
  • receipts. The Commission has certified 25 OVS operators with some now providing service. Broadband service providers (BSPs) are currently the only significant holders of OVS certifications or local OVS franchises, even though OVS is one of four statutorily-recognized options for local exchange carriers (LECs) to offer video programming services. As of June 2003, BSPs served approximately 1.4 million subscribers, representing 1.49 percent of all MVPD households. Among BSPs, however, those operating under the OVS framework are in the minority, with approximately eight percent operating with an OVS certification. Serving approximately 460,000 of these subscribers, Affiliates of Residential Communications Network, Inc. (``RCN'') is currently the largest BSP and 11th largest MVPD. RCN received approval to operate OVS systems in New York City,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-24A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-24A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-24A1.txt
  • receipts. The Commission has certified 25 OVS operators with some now providing service. Broadband service providers (BSPs) are currently the only significant holders of OVS certifications or local OVS franchises, even though OVS is one of four statutorily-recognized options for local exchange carriers (LECs) to offer video programming services. As of June 2003, BSPs served approximately 1.4 million subscribers, representing 1.49 percent of all MVPD households. Among BSPs, however, those operating under the OVS framework are in the minority, with approximately eight percent operating with an OVS certification. Serving approximately 460,000 of these subscribers, Affiliates of Residential Communications Network, Inc. (``RCN'') is currently the largest BSP and 11th largest MVPD. RCN received approval to operate OVS systems in New York City,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-49A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-49A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-49A1.txt
  • receipts. The Commission has certified 25 OVS operators with some now providing service. Broadband service providers (BSPs) are currently the only significant holders of OVS certifications or local OVS franchises, even though OVS is one of four statutorily-recognized options for local exchange carriers (LECs) to offer video programming services. As of June 2003, BSPs served approximately 1.4 million subscribers, representing 1.49 percent of all MVPD households. Among BSPs, however, those operating under the OVS framework are in the minority, with approximately eight percent operating with an OVS certification. Serving approximately 460,000 of these subscribers, Affiliates of Residential Communications Network, Inc. (``RCN'') is currently the largest BSP and 11th largest MVPD. RCN received approval to operate OVS systems in New York City,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-51A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-51A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-51A1.txt
  • 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 405 and Section 1.106 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.106, that the Petition for Reconsideration filed by Hispanic Information and Telecommunications Network, Inc. on March 5, 2004 IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i) and Sections 1.49 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.49, that the Motion to Dismiss Application for Review and Application for Stay filed by Ball State University on January 5, 2004 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATION COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Application for Review and Request for Stay (filed Dec. 15, 2003) (AFR). Hispanic Information and Telecommunications Network, et al., Memorandum Opinion and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-76A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-76A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-76A1.txt
  • receipts. The Commission has certified 25 OVS operators with some now providing service. Broadband service providers (BSPs) are currently the only significant holders of OVS certifications or local OVS franchises, even though OVS is one of four statutorily-recognized options for local exchange carriers (LECs) to offer video programming services. As of June 2003, BSPs served approximately 1.4 million subscribers, representing 1.49 percent of all MVPD households. Among BSPs, however, those operating under the OVS framework are in the minority, with approximately eight percent operating with an OVS certification. Serving approximately 460,000 of these subscribers, Affiliates of Residential Communications Network, Inc. (``RCN'') is currently the largest BSP and 11th largest MVPD. RCN received approval to operate OVS systems in New York City,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-120A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-120A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-120A1.txt
  • the diskette. The label should also include the following phrase "Disk Copy - Not an Original." Each diskette should contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. . . Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with Section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, and to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their submission. We also strongly encourage that parties track the organization set forth in this Notice in order to facilitate our internal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-163A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-163A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-163A1.txt
  • Marlene H. Dortch Secretary APPENDIX A Rule Changes Part 1 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended to read as follows: 1. Section 1.401 is amended by revising paragraphs (b) and (d) to read as follows: � 1.401 Petitions for rule making. ***** (b) The petition for rule making shall conform to the requirements of �� 1.49, 1.52, and 1.419(b) (or � 1.420(e), if applicable), and shall be submitted or addressed to the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 20554, or may be submitted electronically. ***** (d) . . . Petitions to amend the FM Table of Allotments must be accompanied by the appropriate construction permit application and payment of the appropriate application filing fee. 2. Section
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.txt
  • the diskette. The label should also include the following phrase "Disk Copy - Not an Original." Each diskette should contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. . . Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with Section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, and to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their submission. We also strongly encourage that parties track the organization set forth in this NPRM in order to facilitate our internal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1_Erratum.doc
  • the diskette. The label should also include the following phrase "Disk Copy - Not an Original." Each diskette should contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. . . Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with Section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, and to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their submission. We also strongly encourage that parties track the organization set forth in this NPRM in order to facilitate our internal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-128A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-128A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-128A1.txt
  • receipts. The Commission has certified 25 OVS operators with some now providing service. Broadband service providers (BSPs) are currently the only significant holders of OVS certifications or local OVS franchises, even though OVS is one of four statutorily-recognized options for local exchange carriers (LECs) to offer video programming services. As of June 2003, BSPs served approximately 1.4 million subscribers, representing 1.49 percent of all MVPD households. Among BSPs, however, those operating under the OVS framework are in the minority, with approximately eight percent operating with an OVS certification. Serving approximately 460,000 of these subscribers, Affiliates of Residential Communications Network, Inc. (``RCN'') is currently the largest BSP and 11th largest MVPD. RCN received approval to operate OVS systems in New York City,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-138A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-138A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-138A1.txt
  • the proposed DTV Table Appendix B to specify the parameters of the construction permit application that was pending at the time IBC's comments were filed and that has now been granted. IBC states that the proposed change in site and technical facilities will enable WTCV to serve an additional 318,230 viewers. However, the WTCV facilities requested by IBC would cause 1.49 percent new interference to WSJU-TV, San Juan, Puerto Rico (analog channel 30, post-transition digital channel 31) and WTCV is not currently operational. As the facilities requested by IBC would cause new interference in excess of the 0.1 percent interference standard and the station is not yet providing service to the public, we will deny IBC's request to change DTV Table
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-169A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-169A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-169A1.txt
  • has approved approximately 120 OVS certifications with some OVS operators now providing service. Broadband service providers (BSPs) are currently the only significant holders of OVS certifications or local OVS franchises, even though OVS is one of four statutorily-recognized options for local exchange carriers (LECs) to offer video programming services. As of June 2005, BSPs served approximately 1.4 million subscribers, representing 1.49 percent of all MVPD households. Among BSPs, however, those operating under the OVS framework are in the minority. As of June 2005, RCN Corporation is the largest BSP and 14th largest MVPD, serving approximately 371,000 subscribers. RCN received approval to operate OVS systems in New York City, Boston, Washington, D.C. and other areas. The Commission does not have financial information
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-18A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-18A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-18A1.txt
  • receipts. The Commission has certified 25 OVS operators with some now providing service. Broadband service providers (BSPs) are currently the only significant holders of OVS certifications or local OVS franchises, even though OVS is one of four statutorily-recognized options for local exchange carriers (LECs) to offer video programming services. As of June 2003, BSPs served approximately 1.4 million subscribers, representing 1.49 percent of all MVPD households. Among BSPs, however, those operating under the OVS framework are in the minority, with approximately eight percent operating with an OVS certification. Serving approximately 460,000 of these subscribers, Affiliates of Residential Communications Network, Inc. (``RCN'') is currently the largest BSP and 11th largest MVPD. RCN received approval to operate OVS systems in New York City,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-208A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-208A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-208A1.txt
  • has approved approximately 120 OVS certifications with some OVS operators now providing service. Broadband service providers (BSPs) are currently the only significant holders of OVS certifications or local OVS franchises, even though OVS is one of four statutorily-recognized options for local exchange carriers (LECs) to offer video programming services. As of June 2005, BSPs served approximately 1.4 million subscribers, representing 1.49 percent of all MVPD households. Among BSPs, however, those operating under the OVS framework are in the minority. As of June 2005, RCN Corporation is the largest BSP and 14th largest MVPD, serving approximately 371,000 subscribers. RCN received approval to operate OVS systems in New York City, Boston, Washington, D.C. and other areas. The Commission does not have financial information
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-34A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-34A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-34A1.txt
  • is a high degree of correlation between excess supply and lease rates, indicating that the volume of outside options has a strong influence on market prices. TABLE 7 TRANSPONDER LEASE RATES AND EXCESS SUPPLY OF TRANSPONDERS Region 2003/2004 Average Revenue/Transponder in Millions of $ Excess Supply/Total Supply (2005) Western Europe 3.02 30.7 % Asia Pacific 1.51 46.4 % North America 1.49 47.1 % Sub Saharan Africa 1.37 53.5 % Middle East and North Africa 1.41 28.3 % Latin America 1.36 38.8 % Central Europe 1.40 52.0 % Russia and Central Asia 1.31 52.6 % Southern Asia 0.87 55.7 % Source: Euroconsult 2006 Report. Retail Markets For retail markets with many customers, short term financial arrangements, and high customer mobility, substantial investments
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-76A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-76A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-76A1.txt
  • the diskette. The label should also include the following phrase "Disk Copy - Not an Original." Each diskette should contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. . . Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with Section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, and to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their submission. We also strongly encourage that parties track the organization set forth in this NPRM in order to facilitate our internal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-7A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-7A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-7A1.txt
  • receipts. The Commission has certified 25 OVS operators with some now providing service. Broadband service providers (BSPs) are currently the only significant holders of OVS certifications or local OVS franchises, even though OVS is one of four statutorily-recognized options for local exchange carriers (LECs) to offer video programming services. As of June 2003, BSPs served approximately 1.4 million subscribers, representing 1.49 percent of all MVPD households. Among BSPs, however, those operating under the OVS framework are in the minority, with approximately eight percent operating with an OVS certification. Serving approximately 460,000 of these subscribers, Affiliates of Residential Communications Network, Inc. (``RCN'') is currently the largest BSP and 11th largest MVPD. RCN received approval to operate OVS systems in New York City,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-86A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-86A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-86A1.txt
  • copying during regular business hours in the FCC Reference Information Center, Room CY-A257, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554 and through the ECFS, accessible on the Commission's World Wide Website, www.fcc.gov. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments also must comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, and to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their submission. We also strongly encourage that parties track the organization set forth in this Notice in order to facilitate our internal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-151A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-151A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-151A1.txt
  • We further direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. We strongly encourage that parties track the organization set forth in this Further Notice in order to facilitate our internal review process. Comments and reply comments must otherwise comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. Ex Parte Rules. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-173A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-173A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-173A1.txt
  • Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. Antoinette Stevens's e-mail address is Antoinette.Stevens@fcc.gov and telephone number is (202) 418-7387. , by telephone at (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, or by facsimile at (202) 488-5563. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. We direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, regardless of the length of their submission. We also strongly encourage parties to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-203A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-203A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-203A1.txt
  • Internet to Judith-B.Herman@fcc.gov, and to Kristy L. LaLonde, OMB Desk Officer, Room 10234 NEOB, 725 17th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20503 via the Internet to Kristy_L._LaLonde@omb.eop.gov or by fax to (202) 395-5167. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments also must comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, and to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their submission. We also strongly encourage that parties track the organization set forth in this Notice in order to facilitate our internal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-255A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-255A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-255A1.txt
  • comments and reply comments to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. We further encourage that parties in their comments track the organization set forth in this NPRM in order to facilitate our internal review process. Comments and reply comments otherwise must comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. Ex Parte Rules. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-89A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-89A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-89A1.txt
  • Internet to Judith-B.Herman@fcc.gov, and to Kristy L. LaLonde, OMB Desk Officer, Room 10234 NEOB, 725 17th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20503 via the Internet to Kristy_L._LaLonde@omb.eop.gov or by fax to (202) 395-5167. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments also must comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, and to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their submission. We also strongly encourage that parties track the organization set forth in this Further Notice in order to facilitate our
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-56A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-56A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-56A1.txt
  • identical to, or comparable to, the relief sought in the forbearance petition. Alternatively, the petition must state that the petitioner has not, in a pending proceeding, requested or otherwise taken a position on the relief sought, if that is the case. Format and Filing Requirements. Petitions for forbearance must comply with the Commission's general filing requirements in 47 C.F.R. � 1.49. In addition, all petitions for forbearance must be emailed to forbearance@fcc.gov at the time of filing. All filings including all data related to a forbearance petition must be provided in a searchable format. The steps a filer must take to ensure its submission is searchable will vary by context. At a minimum, a party that submits large spreadsheets of data
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-125A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-125A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-125A1.txt
  • Washington DC 20554. . or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (tty). , by telephone at (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, or by facsimile at (202) 488-5563. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. We direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, regardless of the length of their submission. We also strongly encourage parties to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-31A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-31A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-31A1.txt
  • computer or the Internet or because the filing contains confidential business or financial information. We therefore propose to codify an exception. Specifically, we propose the following language in rule 1.1206(b): The memorandum required to be submitted to the Secretary under this subpart must be submitted no later than the next business day after the presentation. In proceedings governed by � 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, the memorandum shall, when feasible, be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding. In other proceedings or if filing through the electronic comment filing system would present an undue hardship, an original and one copy must be submitted to the Secretary and also
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-32A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-32A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-32A1.txt
  • for ECFS, and seek comment generally on issues raised by the increased use of electronic filing in Commission proceedings. In what types of non-rulemaking matters might it be appropriate to permit electronic filing of all pleadings through ECFS? Are there certain non-rulemaking proceedings that do not lend themselves to electronic filing of pleadings through ECFS? How should we amend section 1.49 of our rules (and any other rules the revision of which may be necessary) to augment the number of proceedings in which parties may file all pleadings through ECFS? Are there statutory implications for enhanced electronic filing that we should take into account, such as the Privacy Act? If we permit more filings under ECFS, what are the implications for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-83A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-83A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-83A1.txt
  • Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (tty). and his telephone number is (202) 418-7400. , by telephone at (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, or by facsimile at (202) 488-5563. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. We direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, regardless of the length of their submission. We also strongly encourage parties to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-101A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-101A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-101A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-106A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-106A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-106A1.txt
  • filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. In proceedings governed by section 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-107A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-107A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-107A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-120A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-120A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-120A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-121A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-121A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-121A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-121A1_Rcd.pdf
  • prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex partepresentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-124A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-124A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-124A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-133A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-133A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-133A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with Section 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by Section 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-134A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-134A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-134A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-138A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-138A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-138A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-151A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-151A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-151A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-153A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-153A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-153A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-155A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-155A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-155A1.txt
  • filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. In proceedings governed by section 1.49(f) of the rules or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-159A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-159A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-159A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.txt
  • 0.143** 0.220** 0.0 544 0.117* 0.171** 0.186*** 0.222 (6.11) (3.57) (2.60) (2.42) (1.74) (2.86) (2.91) (0.68) (2.30) (3.05) ( 4.33) (1.69) Land_Area_uc 0.00647 0.0223 -0.0051 -0.0614 -0.216 -0.0178 0.0292 0.145 -0.0146 -0.109 -0.104 -0.297 (0.10) (0.21) (-0.02) (-0.22) (-1.41) (-0.12) (0.15) (0.72) (-0.13) (-0 .86) (-0.71) (-0.98) Land_Area_ua -0.101 0.137 0.596 0.265 -0.0041 -0.289* 0.0983 0.219 0.169 0.482 -0.384** -0.467 (-1.49) (0.72) (1.19) (0.48) (-0.02) (-2.33) (0.24) (0.68) (1.36) (1.86 ) (-2.59) (-0.95) Percent_Water 0.866*** -0.0712 -0.434 -1.103 0.299 -0.244 0.808 1.731* 0.577 -0.821 - 0.246 -0.0843 (3.31) (-0.19) (-0.36) (-0.91) (0.38) (-0.54) (0.86) (2.53) (1.03) (-1. 37) (-0.31) (-0.05) Census_Blocs_nu 0.134* 0.200* 0.228 0.297 0.0559 0.113 -0.129 0.135 0.17 6 0.0630 0.0840 -0.259 (2.44) (2.37) (1.27) (1.53) (0.58) (1.05) (-0.77)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-162A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-162A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-162A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-169A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-169A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-169A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-16A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-16A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-16A1.txt
  • feasible.'' NAB too supports this proposal, commenting that greater use of docketing, ``along with the proposal to increase electronic filing, should enable interested parties to more easily locate, follow and participate in proceedings.'' Several other commenters voice similar assessments. We therefore find it in the public interest to require the use of electronic filing whenever technically feasible. We amend Section 1.49 accordingly. To begin the implementation of this policy, and in conjunction with our decision to expand the use of numbered docketing, we will require migration of the following categories of proceedings to a fully electronic filing format via ECFS: Newly filed Section 208 formal common carrier complaints and newly filed Section 224 pole attachment complaints before the Enforcement Bureau; customer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-184A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-184A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-184A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-185A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-185A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-185A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-185A1_Rcd.pdf
  • prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex partepresentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-186A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-186A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-186A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-30A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-30A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-30A1.txt
  • plans, we suggest that parties consult Section 0.459 of the Commission's rules about the submission of confidential information. , by telephone at (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, or by facsimile at (202) 488-5563. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with Section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. We direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, regardless of the length of their submission. We also strongly encourage parties to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-32A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-32A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-32A1.txt
  • Washington DC 20554. . or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (tty). , by telephone at (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, or by facsimile at (202) 488-5563. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. We direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, regardless of the length of their submission. We also strongly encourage parties to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-37A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-37A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-37A1.txt
  • notice, to appear at a scheduled conference will be deemed a waiver by that party and will not preclude the Commission staff from conferring with those parties and/or counsel present. � 8.36 Specifications as to pleadings, briefs, and other documents; subscription. (a) All papers filed in any formal complaint proceeding must be drawn in conformity with the requirements of �� 1.49 and 1.50 of this chapter. (b) All averments of claims or defenses in complaints and answers shall be made in numbered paragraphs. The contents of each paragraph shall be limited as far as practicable to a statement of a single set of circumstances. Each claim founded on a separate transaction or occurrence and each affirmative defense shall be separately stated
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-75A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-75A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-75A1.txt
  • International Bureau, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554; e-mail Kimberly. Cook@ fcc.gov. (5) Mark Uretsky, Economist, Policy Division, International Bureau, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554; e-mail Mark.Uretsky@ fcc.gov . Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments' length of their submission. We also strongly encourage that parties track the organization set forth in the Further Notice of Proposed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-75A1_Rcd.pdf
  • CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554, telephone: (202) 488-5300, fax: (202) 488-5563, or via e-mail www.bcpiweb.com. They will also be accessible through the Commission's Electronic Filing System (ECFS) on the Commission's website, www.fcc.gov. 69. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules.137All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments' length of their submission. We also strongly encourage that parties track the organization set forth in the Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-76A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-76A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-76A1.txt
  • Division, International Bureau, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554; e-mail Sean.O'More@ fcc.gov. (6) Mark Uretsky, Economist, Policy Division, International Bureau, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554; e-mail Mark.Uretsky@ fcc.gov . Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments' length of their submission. We also strongly encourage that parties track the organization set forth in the Further Notice of Proposed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-76A1_Rcd.pdf
  • CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554, telephone: (202) 488-5300, fax: (202) 488-5563, or via e-mail www.bcpiweb.com. They will also be accessible through the Commission's Electronic Filing System (ECFS) on the Commission's website, www.fcc.gov. 155. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules.293All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments' length of their submission. We also strongly encourage that parties track the organization set forth in the Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-18A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-18A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-18A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-20A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-20A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-20A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with section 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by section 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-20A1_Rcd.pdf
  • or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given toCommission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex partepresentations and must be filed consistent with section 1.1206(b).182In proceedings governed by section 1.49(f)183or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g.,.doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should familiarize themselves
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-25A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-25A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-25A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-28A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-28A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-28A1.txt
  • other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. In proceedings governed by Section 1.49(f) of the rules or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-30A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-30A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-30A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-31A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-31A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-31A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-32A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-32A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-32A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-34A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-34A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-34A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-42A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-42A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-42A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-43A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-43A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-43A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-46A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-46A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-46A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-53A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-53A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-53A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-54A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-54A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-54A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-56A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-56A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-56A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with section 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by section 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-61A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-61A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-61A1.txt
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1997/cor97316.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1997/cor97316.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1997/cor97316.wp
  • we tentatively conclude to eliminate several options because they Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-316 A supporting statement, prepared in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, that details the 73 Commission's estimates with respect to the burdens imposed by the proposals in this NPRM is available from the Commission or from the Office of Management and Budget. Cf. 47 C.F.R. � 1.49(b). 74 18 would be too administratively burdensome. The proposals we tentatively reject include: creating and maintaining a national database of primary line designations; using local property records to identify and track primary lines; and using social security numbers to track primary lines. 34. Federal rules which overlap, duplicate or conflict with this rule. None. C. Initial Paperwork Reduction Act Analysis
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98090.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98090.wp
  • utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission's burden estimates; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-90 193 See 47 C.F.R. � 1.49. We require, however, that a summary be included with all comments and reply comments. The summary may be paginated separately from the rest of the pleading (e.g., as "i, ii"). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.49. 39 C. Comment Filing Procedures 92. General Requirements. Pursuant to applicable procedures set forth in sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98118.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98118.wp
  • each Commissioner to receive a personal copy of your comments, you must file an original and twelve copies. Comments and reply comments should be sent to the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 1919 M Street, N.W., Room 222, Washington, D.C. 20554, with copies to: Thomas J. Beers, Common Carrier Bureau, Industry Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-118 79 See 47 C.F.R. � 1.49. 20 Analysis Division, 2033 M Street, N.W., Room 500, Washington, D.C. 20554; Scott K. Bergmann, Common Carrier Bureau, Industry Analysis Division, 2033 M Street, N.W., Room 500, Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties should file one copy of any documents filed in this docket with the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Services, Inc., 2100 M Street, N.W., Suite 140, Washington, D.C. 20037.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98233.pdf
  • 205, 210, 214, 218, 225, 251, 254, 303(r), 332, and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 154(j), 161, 201-205, 210, 214, 218, 225, 251, 254, 303(r), 332 and 403 that this NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING is hereby ADOPTED and that COMMENT IS SOUGHT on these issues. 126 See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.49 (concerning paper copies). 34 Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-233 74. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 11, 201- 205, 210, 214, 218, 225, 251, 254, 303(r), 332, and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 154(j), 161, 201-205, 210, 214, 218, 225, 251, 254, 303(r), 332 and 403 that
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99122.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99122.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99122.wp
  • comments will be available for public inspection during regular business hours in the FCC Reference Center, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. 288.Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-122 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 437 See 47 C.F.R. � 1.49. 119 with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules.437 We also direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, regardless of the length of their submission. Federal
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2001/fcc01132.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2001/fcc01132.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2001/fcc01132.txt
  • one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. We also direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, regardless of the length of their submission. We also strongly encourage that
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97051.pdf
  • proposal. E. Procedural Matters 1. Ex Parte Presentations 76. This is a non-restricted notice-and-comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided that they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1202, 1.1203, Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-51 235 See paras. 78-80, infra. 236 See 47 C.F.R. � 1.49. We require, however, that a summary be included with all comments and reply comments, although a summary that does not exceed three pages will not count towards the 75 page limit for comments or the 35 page limit for reply comments. The summary may be paginated separately from the rest of the pleading (e.g., as "i, ii"). See 47 C.F.R.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.wp
  • CC Docket No. 98-147. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24,121 (1998). Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic file via the Internet to Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-48 229 See 47 C.F.R. � 1.49. 54 . Generally, only one copy of an electronic submission must be filed. In completing the transmittal screen, commenters should include their full name, Postal Service mailing address, and the applicable docket or rulemaking number, which in this instance is CC Docket No. 98-147. Parties may also submit an electronic comment by Internet e-mail. To get filing instructions for e-mail
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01146.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01146.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01146.txt
  • docket number, CC Docket No. 96-262), type of pleading (comment or reply comment), date of submission, and the name of the electronic file on the diskette. The label should also include the following phrase: "Disk Copy-Not an Original." Each diskette should contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. Comments and reply comments must comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. We also direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. That this proceeding will continue to be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01205.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01205.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01205.txt
  • N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036. Comments and reply comments will be available for public inspection during regular business hours in the FCC Reference Center, Room CY-A257, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. We direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, regardless of the length of their submission. We also strongly encourage that parties
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.wp
  • in Michigan, CC Docket No. 97-137, Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 97-298, at 51 (rel. Aug. 19, 1997). 3. WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972). 4. Northside Sanitary Landfill, Inc. v. Thomas, 849 F.2d 1516, 1519 (D.C. Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1078 (1989). 5. See 47 C.F.R. 1.49, 1.741-1.749. 6. See id. at 1.49. 7. Item (g) is obviously the core portion of the Brief in Support, and may be quite lengthy. It may help to divide it, therefore, into three subsections, one corresponding to each of the three requirements set forth in section 271(d)(3). 8. See 47 C.F.R. 1.743. 9. We are increasing the page limit for
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980872.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980872.wp
  • proposed contribution factors for the third quarter. See Proposed Third Quarter 1998 Universal Service Contribution Factors Announced, CC Docket No. 96-45, DA 98-856, Public Notice (rel. May 13, 1998). 20 5 U.S.C. � 804(2)(exempting such rules from definition of "major rule"); see also 5 U.S.C. � 801(a)(3)(only major rules subject to 60-day review requirement). 21 See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. �� 1.49, 1.415, 1.419. 4 not impact the level of support available to the most economically disadvantaged schools and libraries, and seek comment on ways to ensure that those entities receive adequate support.18 We seek comment on directing the Universal Service Administrative Company ("USAC") to collect only as much money as is required by demand, but in no event more than $25
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.wp
  • at para. 205 (released December 30, 1997) (Fourth Order on Reconsideration). 4. Fourth Order on Reconsideration, FCC 97-420, at para. 205. 5. Fourth Order on Reconsideration, FCC 97-420, at para. 206. 6. Kentucky Department of Education, Petition for Waiver (filed June 3, 1998) (Kentucky Petition). 7. Kentucky Petition at 2. 8. Kentucky Petition at 4. 9. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. 1.49, 1.415, 1.419. 10. See 47 C.F.R. 1.1206. References 1. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.wp 2. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.txt 3. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.html#N_1_ 4. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.html#N_2_ 5. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.html#N_3_ 6. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.html#N_4_ 7. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.html#N_5_ 8. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.html#N_6_ 9. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.html#N_7_ 10. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.html#N_8_ 11. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.html#N_9_ 12. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.html#N_10_
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991994.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991994.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991994.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991994.txt
  • InterLATA Services in Michigan, CC Docket No. 97-137, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 20543, at � 51 (1997). WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972). Northside Sanitary Landfill, Inc., v. Thomas, 849 F.2d 1516, 1519 (D.C. Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1078 (1989). See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.49, 1.741-1.749. See id. at � 1.49. Item (g) is obviously the core portion of the Brief in Support, and may be quite lengthy. It may help to divide it, therefore, into three subsections, one corresponding to each of the three requirements set forth in section 271(d)(3). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.743. The Commission expects that parties will include all substantive
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fcc97303.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fcc97303.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fcc97303.wp
  • Relief 149. We seek comment on the following proposed procedures for reviewing requests for relief filed under Section 332(c)(7)(B)(v) of the Communications Act. We propose that parties seeking relief file a request for declaratory ruling pursuant to Section 1.2 of the Commission's Rules, asking that the Commission review the state or local regulation and grant appropriate relief.207 Sections 1.45 through 1.49 of the Commission's Rules, concerning the filing of pleadings and responsive pleadings, shall be applicable with respect to such 207See 47 C.F.R. � 1.2. 63 Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-303 requests.208 We propose that a copy of the request be served on the state or local authority that took the action or failed to take the action against which relief
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Notices/2000/fcc00367.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Notices/2000/fcc00367.txt
  • Copies also can be obtained from International Transcription Services, Inc. at 1231 20th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20036, or by calling ITS at (202) 857-3800 or by faxing ITS at (202) 857-3805. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with Section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments length of their submission. We also strongly encourage that parties track the organization set forth in this Notice in order to
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Notices/2000/fcc00355.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Notices/2000/fcc00355.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Notices/2000/fcc00355.txt
  • one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. We also direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, regardless of the length of their submission. We also strongly encourage that
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1998/fcc98056.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1998/fcc98056.wp
  • or other documents not required to be accompanies by a fee and which are hand-delivered must be tendered for filing in complete form before 5:30 p.m. in the Office of the Secretary, wither in Washington or Gettysburg, as directed by the Rules. The Secretary will determine whether a tendered document meets the pre-5:30 deadline. Documents filed electronically pursuant to � 1.49(f) of the Rules must be received by the Commission's electronic comment filing system before midnight. (h) If a document is required to be served upon other parties by statute or Commission regulation and the document is in fact served by mail (see � 1.47(f)), and the filing period for a response is 10 days or less, an additional 3 days
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.wp
  • the public interest because such requirements are unnecessary under ULS. In the past, multiple copies and microfiche were required to make application and licensing information available to the public. ULS, however, provides an unprecedented degree of accessibility to this information. Whether applications Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-25 See proposed 47 C.F.R. � 1.913 at Appendix C. 39 47 C.F.R. � 1.49(a). 40 See Electronic Filing NPRM, supra. 41 See proposed rules 47 C.F.R. �� 1.45, 1.49, 1.106. 42 See proposed rule 47 C.F.R. � 1.925(b). 43 See Electronic Filing NPRM, supra. 44 We seek comment on whether parties submitting manually-filed pleadings would be required to include a 45 diskette copy. See Section III-A-3, infra. 11 or pleadings are filed electronically or
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99141.pdf
  • Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. Comments and reply comments will be available for public inspection during regular business hours in the FCC Reference Center, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. 94. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with section 1.49, 47 C.F.R. � 1.49, and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. We also direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, regardless of the length of their submission. D.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00366.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00366.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00366.txt
  • S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. Comments and reply comments will be available for public inspection during regular business hours in the FCC Reference Center, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with Section 1.49, 47 C.F.R. � 1.49, and all other applicable sections of the Commission's Rules. We also direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, regardless of the length of their submission. .
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
  • of Service > 12 Hours 64.45NA 73.67 NA 68.59 NA MR-4-08- 3345 % Out of Service > 24 Hours 24.86NA 25.39 NA 27.56 NA MR-5 � Repeat Trouble Reports MR-5-01- 3345 % Repeat Reports within 30 Days 55.52NA 57.53 NA 56.83 NA Special Services - Maintenance MR-2 � Trouble Report Rate MR-2-01- 3200 Network Trouble Report Rate 0.24 1.45 0.24 1.49 0.2 1.62 0.21 1.8 0.21 1.54 MR-2-05- 3200 % CPE/TOK/FOK Trouble Report Rate 0.29 1.94 0.31 2.66 0.27 2.63 2.57 2.94 MR-4 � Trouble Duration Intervals MR-4-01- 3200 Mean Time To Repair � Total 6.9 7.23 7.76 7.45 MR-4-01- 3216 Mean Time To Repair � Total - Non DS0 & DS0 6.52NA 5.77 NA 6.45 2.25 MR-4-01- 3217 Mean Time
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-182A1.html
  • R. Nordrehaug, counsel for Complainants, Blumenthal Ostroff & Markham, dated December 7, 2000 (stating, for example, that the complaint fails to comply with section 1.721(a)(12) which requires that each copy of the complaint filed with the Commission contain a Formal Complaint Intake Form and that the complaint does not include a summary or table of contents as required by section 1.49(b)-(c)). 11 See 47 C.F.R. 1.728(a). 12 Amended Formal Complaint at 1. 13 Id. 14 Id. 15 MCI WorldCom Answer at 17. 16 See American Message Centers v. FCC, 50 F.3d 35, 41 (D.C. Cir. 1995) (citing Amendment of Rules Governing Procedures to be Followed Where Formal Complaints are Filed Against Common Carriers, Report and Order, 3 FCC Rcd 1806, 1806,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1065A1.html
  • Dismiss because the Motion does not comply with certain procedural rules. MAP Opposition to Motion to Dismiss at 2, P:P: 1-2. Specifically, MAP asserts that the Motion fails to include proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, as required by 47 C.F.R. S: 1.727(b), and to include a table of contents and summary, as required by 47 C.F.R. S: 1.49. As to the latter, we decline to dismiss the Motion at this stage of the proceeding for such minor noncompliance with the rules. As to the former, we note that Defendants did provide, in compliance with 47 C.F.R. S: 1.727(c), a proposed order that incorporates its proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law. We decline to dismiss the Motion
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-04-2092A1.html
  • Rcd at 14882-84, 410 -12 (Appendix D, 14 FCC Rcd at 15034-35, 66). See also Delegation of Additional Authority to the Enforcement Bureau, 17 FCC Rcd 4795 (2002) (delegating authority to the Enforcement Bureau to carry out merger-related audit and compliance tasks). 4 47 C.F.R. 1.1200(a), 1.1206. 5 47 C.F.R. 1.1206(b). 6 47 C.F.R. 1.415, 1.419. 7 See 47 C.F.R. 1.49. References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2092A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2092A1.doc 3. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2092A2.pdf 4. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2092A3.pdf
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-04-2093A1.html
  • FCC Rcd at 14190-93, 336-342 (Appendix D, 15 FCC Rcd at 14327-28, 56). See also Delegation of Additional Authority to the Enforcement Bureau, 17 FCC Rcd 4795 (2002) (delegating authority to the Enforcement Bureau to carry out merger-related audit and compliance tasks). 4 47 C.F.R. 1.1200(a), 1.1206. 5 47 C.F.R. 1.1206(b). 6 47 C.F.R. 1.415, 1.419. 7 See 47 C.F.R. 1.49. References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2093A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2093A1.doc 3. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2093A2.pdf 4. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2093A3.pdf
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-11-967A1.html
  • 1 Order"). Id. at P: P: 10, 15. Id. at P: 10. Id. at P: 15. 47 C.F.R. S:S: 1.720-1.736. 47 C.F.R. S:S: 1.1401-1.1418. Note that these new rules do not affect existing section 208 formal complaints or existing section 224 pole attachment complaints. They also do not concern carrier-to-carrier informal complaints. See Id. at Appendix A, (listing new rule S:1.49(f)(1)(i) that requires "[f]ormal complaint proceedings under Section 208 . . . " to be filed electronically and excluding informal complaints from that rule). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 References 1. http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-967A1.pdf 2. http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-967A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/broadcast/Pleadings/Fox_Broadcasting_Company.pdf
  • 1 See In re Complaints Against Various Licensees Regarding Their Broadcast of the Fox Television Network Program "Married By America" on April 7, 2003, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, FCC 04-242 (rel. October 12, 2004) (the "NAL"). Due to the complexity of the issues involved, parties to this Opposition hereby request, to the extent necessary, a waiver of Section 1.49(c) of the Commission's rules (47 C.F.R. � 1.49(c)) to allow for a complete and accurate summary of the Opposition. 2 Each of the licensees listed on Attachment A is an affiliate of Fox and was identified on the attachment to the NAL. While joining this opposition to the NAL, each of these licensees expressly reserves all, and does not waive
• http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-06-163A1.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-06-163A1.pdf
  • Marlene H. Dortch Secretary APPENDIX A Rule Changes Part 1 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended to read as follows: 1. Section 1.401 is amended by revising paragraphs (b) and (d) to read as follows: � 1.401 Petitions for rule making. ***** (b) The petition for rule making shall conform to the requirements of �� 1.49, 1.52, and 1.419(b) (or � 1.420(e), if applicable), and shall be submitted or addressed to the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 20554, or may be submitted electronically. ***** (d) . . . Petitions to amend the FM Table of Allotments must be accompanied by the appropriate construction permit application and payment of the appropriate application filing fee. 2. Section
• http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-12-28A1.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-12-28A1.pdf
  • other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. In proceedings governed by Section 1.49(f) of the rules or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/materials/already-released/consumer090002.pdf
  • Chg. HUT Viewing '95- '00 Chg. Daily Paper Circ. per cap '93- '99 Chg. Weekly Paper Circ. per cap '93- '99 Chg. AQH List '94-'98 Chg. AQH News List '93-'97 Chg. Cable Use '94-'00 Int Use '00 Int News Use '00 Chg. TV Stns. '94-'00 0.6104 -0.0157 0.1023 0.0779 -0.0259 -0.3002 -0.7365 -0.6838 (1.84) (0.07) (0.14) (1.33) (0.78) (1.06) (0.91) (1.49) Chg. Inside Radio Stns '93-'97 -0.0898 -0.1078 -0.1958 0.0091 -0.1842 -0.1856 (1.01) (1.67) (1.02) (0.56) (2.43)* (0.85) Chg. Daily Papers '93-'99 -0.2157 1.4125 -0.1983 -0.0929 0.0028 -0.2911 1.3533 0.8029 (0.63) (5.72)** (0.27) (1.56) (0.08) (1.00) (1.62) (1.70) Chg. Weekly Papers '93-'99 0.0075 0.0203 0.0444 -0.0033 0.0024 0.0180 0.0504 0.0198 (0.39) (1.48) (1.09) (1.01) (1.24) (1.11) (1.08) (0.75) Chg. Inside News
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/31/releases/da010788.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/31/releases/da010788.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/31/releases/da010788.txt
  • Report and Order''). See ``Auction of Licenses for the 747-762 and 777-792 MHz Bands Postponed Until September 12, 2001,'' Public Notice, Report No. AUC-01-31-A, DA 01-266 (rel. Jan. 31, 2001). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (suspension, amendment, and waiver of Commission Rules). See also 5 U.S.C. � 553(b)(3)(B). See, e.g., 47 U.S.C. �� 309(j), 337. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. �� 1.49, 1.429. See, e.g., 47 U.S.C. �� 303, 309(j), 337. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). See id. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.419(c). - PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202 / 418-2830 TTY 202 / 418-2555 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov B J
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/releases/da980827.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/releases/da980827.pdf
  • the ULS proceeding, and to encourage parties in the proceeding to file comments electronically. The Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) is already fully operational and prepared to receive electronic comments. We also note that the Commission recently allowed electronic filing by waiver in the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking adopted in the section 255 proceeding. 5. Therefore, we hereby waive sections 1.49(a), 1.415, and 1.419 of our rules and will allow comments and reply comments in this proceeding to be filed electronically, provided they conform to the filing procedures established in the Electronic Filing Report and Order. Such comments will be considered part of the record in this proceeding and accorded the same treatment as comments filed on paper pursuant to our
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Notices/2000/fcc00165.doc
  • to the original authorization or the last major change exceed the threshold(s) set forth above as major changes. We seek comment on this proposal. Commenters should address the standard we should adopt to alert applicants and licensees that multiple minor amendments or modifications will be considered a major change. 2. Filing of Pleadings Associated with Applications 34. Background. Currently, Section 1.49 of our rules allows pleadings and documents filed in most Commission proceeding to be filed electronically. 35. Discussion. Once COALS is implemented, we intend to enhance COALS to allow pleadings and informal requests for Commission actions associated with applications or licenses in cable services to be filed electronically. Such pleadings include petitions to deny, petitions for reconsideration, applications for review,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Comments/96149.html
  • (ISA)(Filed 08/19/96) LDDS WorldCom comments.doc MCI MFS Communications Company, Inc. (MFS) 167057.1 167065.1 Michigan Public Service Commission Missouri Public Service Commission 96_149.wp5 95_116.wp5 96_45.wp5 readme.txt NARUC NCTA 57201.1 New Jersey Division of the Rate Payer Advocate New York State Department of Public Service cc96-149 cc96-149.cos cc96-149.toc NYNEX nynex.doc nynextoc.doc Pacific Telesis Group ptgcmt.wp Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (PUCO)(Filed 08/19/96) !wp596-1.49 !wp5mtne.xt Public Utilities Commission of the State of California fccsaf~1.doc SBC Communications Inc. 96-149.cvr 96149.cos comment1.fin summary.fin toc.doc Sprint Corporation (Sprint) Telecommunications Industry Association ashley.doc Telecommunications Resellers Association (TRA) comments.tra Teleport Communications Group, Inc. 29107 1.wp5 Time Warner Cable cc96-149.doc TLD US West 96-149.doc erratum.doc USTA comments.cov comments.fnl comments.toc Voice-Tel Yellow Pages Publishers Association 272.cmt SEPARATE REPLY COMMENTS on LEC/Non-Dom.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1997/cor97316.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1997/cor97316.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1997/cor97316.wp
  • we tentatively conclude to eliminate several options because they Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-316 A supporting statement, prepared in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, that details the 73 Commission's estimates with respect to the burdens imposed by the proposals in this NPRM is available from the Commission or from the Office of Management and Budget. Cf. 47 C.F.R. � 1.49(b). 74 18 would be too administratively burdensome. The proposals we tentatively reject include: creating and maintaining a national database of primary line designations; using local property records to identify and track primary lines; and using social security numbers to track primary lines. 34. Federal rules which overlap, duplicate or conflict with this rule. None. C. Initial Paperwork Reduction Act Analysis
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1997/fcc97316.pdf
  • we tentatively conclude to eliminate several options because they Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-316 A supporting statement, prepared in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, that details the 73 Commission's estimates with respect to the burdens imposed by the proposals in this NPRM is available from the Commission or from the Office of Management and Budget. Cf. 47 C.F.R. � 1.49(b). 74 18 would be too administratively burdensome. The proposals we tentatively reject include: creating and maintaining a national database of primary line designations; using local property records to identify and track primary lines; and using social security numbers to track primary lines. 34. Federal rules which overlap, duplicate or conflict with this rule. None. C. Initial Paperwork Reduction Act Analysis
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1997/fcc97317.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1997/fcc97317.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1997/fcc97317.wp
  • under consideration in this Further Notice do not include reporting and record keeping requirements. 14. Any significant alternatives minimizing impact on small entities and consistent with stated objectives. Wherever possible, this Further Notice proposes general rules, or alternative rules to reduce the administrative burden and cost of compliance for small telecommunications Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-317 Cf. 47 C.F.R. � 1.49(b). 20 6 service providers. In addition, this Further Notice invites comment on measures to avoid significant burdens on small entities and small telecommunications service providers. 15. Federal rules which overlap, duplicate, or conflict with this rule. None. C. Deadlines and Instructions for Filing Comments 16. Pursuant to applicable procedures set forth in sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98090.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98090.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98090.wp
  • utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission's burden estimates; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-90 193 See 47 C.F.R. � 1.49. We require, however, that a summary be included with all comments and reply comments. The summary may be paginated separately from the rest of the pleading (e.g., as "i, ii"). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.49. 39 C. Comment Filing Procedures 92. General Requirements. Pursuant to applicable procedures set forth in sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98118.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98118.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98118.wp
  • each Commissioner to receive a personal copy of your comments, you must file an original and twelve copies. Comments and reply comments should be sent to the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 1919 M Street, N.W., Room 222, Washington, D.C. 20554, with copies to: Thomas J. Beers, Common Carrier Bureau, Industry Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-118 79 See 47 C.F.R. � 1.49. 20 Analysis Division, 2033 M Street, N.W., Room 500, Washington, D.C. 20554; Scott K. Bergmann, Common Carrier Bureau, Industry Analysis Division, 2033 M Street, N.W., Room 500, Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties should file one copy of any documents filed in this docket with the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Services, Inc., 2100 M Street, N.W., Suite 140, Washington, D.C. 20037.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98233.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98233.wp
  • 205, 210, 214, 218, 225, 251, 254, 303(r), 332, and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 154(j), 161, 201-205, 210, 214, 218, 225, 251, 254, 303(r), 332 and 403 that this NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING is hereby ADOPTED and that COMMENT IS SOUGHT on these issues. 126 See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.49 (concerning paper copies). 34 Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-233 74. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 11, 201- 205, 210, 214, 218, 225, 251, 254, 303(r), 332, and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 154(j), 161, 201-205, 210, 214, 218, 225, 251, 254, 303(r), 332 and 403 that
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99122.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99122.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99122.wp
  • comments will be available for public inspection during regular business hours in the FCC Reference Center, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. 288.Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-122 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 437 See 47 C.F.R. � 1.49. 119 with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules.437 We also direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, regardless of the length of their submission. Federal
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2000/fcc00171.doc
  • Reference Center, Room CY A-257, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20554; and with Al McCloud, Network Services Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Room 6 A-207, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20554. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's Rules. We also direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. All parties are encouraged to provide a table of contents, regardless of the length of their submission. We also strongly encourage that
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2001/fcc01132.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2001/fcc01132.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2001/fcc01132.txt
  • one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. We also direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, regardless of the length of their submission. We also strongly encourage that
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97051.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97051.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97051.wp
  • proposal. E. Procedural Matters 1. Ex Parte Presentations 76. This is a non-restricted notice-and-comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided that they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1202, 1.1203, Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-51 235 See paras. 78-80, infra. 236 See 47 C.F.R. � 1.49. We require, however, that a summary be included with all comments and reply comments, although a summary that does not exceed three pages will not count towards the 75 page limit for comments or the 35 page limit for reply comments. The summary may be paginated separately from the rest of the pleading (e.g., as "i, ii"). See 47 C.F.R.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97292.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97292.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97292.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97292.wp
  • See 47 C.F.R. 69.601, 69.603. NECA subsequently assumed responsibility for administering the existing universal service fund (47 C.F.R. 69.116, 69.603), the Lifeline Assistance program (47 C.F.R. 69.117, 69.603), the LTS program (47 C.F.R. 69.2(y), 69.612); and TRS Fund (47 C.F.R. 64.604(c)(4)(iii). 48. 5 U.S.C. 605(b). 49. 47 C.F.R. 1.415, 1.419. 50. Comments and reply comments also must comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. See 47 C.F.R. 1.49. We require that a summary be included, however, with all comments and reply comments, regardless of length. References 1. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97292.txt 2. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97292.wp 3. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97292.pdf 4. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97292.html#N_1_ 5. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97292.html#N_2_ 6. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97292.html#N_3_ 7. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97292.html#N_4_ 8. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97292.html#N_5_ 9. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97292.html#N_6_ 10. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97292.html#N_7_ 11. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97292.html#N_8_ 12. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97292.html#N_9_ 13. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97292.html#N_10_ 14. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97292.html#N_11_ 15.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98188.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98188.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98188.wp
  • whether parties choose to file electronically or by paper, parties should also file one copy of any documents filed in this docket with the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Services, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C., 20036. Comments and reply comments will be available for public inspection during regular Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-188 371 See 47 C.F.R. � 1.49. 89 business hours in the FCC Reference Center, 1919 M Street, N.W., Room 239, Washington, D.C., 20554. 204.Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules.371 We also direct all interested
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.wp
  • CC Docket No. 98-147. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24,121 (1998). Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic file via the Internet to Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-48 229 See 47 C.F.R. � 1.49. 54 . Generally, only one copy of an electronic submission must be filed. In completing the transmittal screen, commenters should include their full name, Postal Service mailing address, and the applicable docket or rulemaking number, which in this instance is CC Docket No. 98-147. Parties may also submit an electronic comment by Internet e-mail. To get filing instructions for e-mail
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00056.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00056.txt
  • must be sent to the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W. Room TW A325, Washington, D.C. 20554. Comment Filing Procedures: Other Requirements. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. We also direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, regardless of the length of their submission. Parties who choose to file
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00104.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00104.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00104.txt
  • of each filing. All filings must be sent to the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W. Room TW A325, Washington, D.C. 20554. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. We also direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, regardless of the length of their submission. Parties who choose to file
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00297.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00297.txt
  • N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036. Comments and reply comments will be available for public inspection during regular business hours in the FCC Reference Center, Room CY-A257, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. We also direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, regardless of the length of their submission. We also strongly encourage that
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00429.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00429.txt
  • of each filing. All filings must be sent to the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W. Room TW A325, Washington, D.C. 20554. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. We also direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, regardless of the length of their submission. Parties who choose to file
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01026.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01026.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01026.txt
  • N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036. Comments and reply comments will be available for public inspection during regular business hours in the FCC Reference Center, Room CY-A257, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. We also direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, regardless of the length of their submission. We also strongly encourage that
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01146.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01146.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01146.txt
  • docket number, CC Docket No. 96-262), type of pleading (comment or reply comment), date of submission, and the name of the electronic file on the diskette. The label should also include the following phrase: "Disk Copy-Not an Original." Each diskette should contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. Comments and reply comments must comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. We also direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. That this proceeding will continue to be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01205.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01205.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01205.txt
  • N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036. Comments and reply comments will be available for public inspection during regular business hours in the FCC Reference Center, Room CY-A257, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. We direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, regardless of the length of their submission. We also strongly encourage that parties
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2002/fcc02331.pdf
  • 21.31 45.60 1 B.2.1.3.1.1Loop + Port Combinations/<10 circuits/Dispatch/TN (days) 4.75 2.96 5.57 3.09 5.72 3.14 6.01 2.87 5.92 2.98 B.2.1.3.1.2Loop + Port Combinations/<10 circuits/Non-Dispatch/TN (days) 0.90 0.64 0.89 0.67 0.91 0.70 0.91 0.94 1.10 0.83 B.2.1.3.1.3Loop + Port Combinations/<10 circuits/Switch Based Orders/TN (days) 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 B.2.1.3.1.4Loop + Port Combinations/<10 circuits/Dispatch In/TN (days) 1.49 1.25 1.46 1.29 1.51 1.33 1.50 1.49 1.80 1.43 B.2.1.3.2.1Loop + Port Combinations/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/TN (days) 11.74 3.50 21.18 2.67 9.77 0.33 13.56 4.50 12.66 3.00 1,2,3,4,5 B.2.1.3.2.2Loop + Port Combinations/>=10 circuits/Non-Dispatch/TN (days) 4.49 3.00 6.44 6.08 7.01 4.00 7.18 1,4 B.2.1.3.2.4Loop + Port Combinations/>=10 circuits/Dispatch In/TN (days) 5.47 3.00 10.05 7.76 8.84 4.00 9.62 1,4 B.2.1.4.1.1Combo Other/<10 circuits/Dispatch/TN (days) 5.91
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1996/fcc96469.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1996/fcc96469.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1996/fcc96469.wp
  • and policies contained herein will become effective.[12]^(10) By the Commission. News Media contact: Mindy J. Ginsburg (202) 418-1500. FCC Common Carrier Bureau contact: David Ellen (202) 418-1580. - FCC - __________________________________________________________________ 1. See also Comment Sought on Standard Protective Order to be Used in Connection With Section 271 Applications, DA 96-1751 (rel. Oct. 23, 1996). 2. ^2 See 47 C.F.R. 1.49, 1.741-1.749. 3. ^3 See id. at 1.49. 4. ^4 Item (g) is obviously the core item of the Brief in Support, and may be quite lengthy. It may help to divide it, therefore, into three subsections, one corresponding to each of the three requirements set forth in section 271(d)(3). 5. ^5 See 47 C.F.R. 1.743. 6. ^6 See id. at
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.wp
  • in Michigan, CC Docket No. 97-137, Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 97-298, at 51 (rel. Aug. 19, 1997). 3. WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972). 4. Northside Sanitary Landfill, Inc. v. Thomas, 849 F.2d 1516, 1519 (D.C. Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1078 (1989). 5. See 47 C.F.R. 1.49, 1.741-1.749. 6. See id. at 1.49. 7. Item (g) is obviously the core portion of the Brief in Support, and may be quite lengthy. It may help to divide it, therefore, into three subsections, one corresponding to each of the three requirements set forth in section 271(d)(3). 8. See 47 C.F.R. 1.743. 9. We are increasing the page limit for
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980181.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980181.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980181.wp
  • and Tohono O'odham Utility Authority Petition for Designation as Eligible Telecommunications Carriers (filed Dec. 18, 1997). 4. Fort Mojave Telecommunications, Inc., Gila River Telecommunications, Inc., San Carlos Telecommunications, Inc., and Tohono O'odham Utility Authority Supplement to Petition for Designation as Eligible Telecommunications Carriers Pursuant to Section 214(e)(6) of the Communications Act (filed Jan. 28, 1998). 5. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. 1.49, 1.415, 1.419. 6. See 47 C.F.R. 1.1206. References 1. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980181.txt 2. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980181.wp 3. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980181.html#N_1_ 4. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980181.html#N_2_ 5. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980181.html#N_3_ 6. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980181.html#N_4_ 7. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980181.html#N_5_ 8. http://www.fcc.gov/e-file/ecfs.html 9. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980181.html#N_6_
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980872.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980872.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980872.wp
  • proposed contribution factors for the third quarter. See Proposed Third Quarter 1998 Universal Service Contribution Factors Announced, CC Docket No. 96-45, DA 98-856, Public Notice (rel. May 13, 1998). 20 5 U.S.C. � 804(2)(exempting such rules from definition of "major rule"); see also 5 U.S.C. � 801(a)(3)(only major rules subject to 60-day review requirement). 21 See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. �� 1.49, 1.415, 1.419. 4 not impact the level of support available to the most economically disadvantaged schools and libraries, and seek comment on ways to ensure that those entities receive adequate support.18 We seek comment on directing the Universal Service Administrative Company ("USAC") to collect only as much money as is required by demand, but in no event more than $25
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.wp
  • at para. 205 (released December 30, 1997) (Fourth Order on Reconsideration). 4. Fourth Order on Reconsideration, FCC 97-420, at para. 205. 5. Fourth Order on Reconsideration, FCC 97-420, at para. 206. 6. Kentucky Department of Education, Petition for Waiver (filed June 3, 1998) (Kentucky Petition). 7. Kentucky Petition at 2. 8. Kentucky Petition at 4. 9. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. 1.49, 1.415, 1.419. 10. See 47 C.F.R. 1.1206. References 1. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.wp 2. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.txt 3. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.html#N_1_ 4. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.html#N_2_ 5. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.html#N_3_ 6. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.html#N_4_ 7. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.html#N_5_ 8. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.html#N_6_ 9. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.html#N_7_ 10. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.html#N_8_ 11. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.html#N_9_ 12. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.html#N_10_
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991994.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991994.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991994.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991994.txt
  • InterLATA Services in Michigan, CC Docket No. 97-137, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 20543, at � 51 (1997). WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1157 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972). Northside Sanitary Landfill, Inc., v. Thomas, 849 F.2d 1516, 1519 (D.C. Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1078 (1989). See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.49, 1.741-1.749. See id. at � 1.49. Item (g) is obviously the core portion of the Brief in Support, and may be quite lengthy. It may help to divide it, therefore, into three subsections, one corresponding to each of the three requirements set forth in section 271(d)(3). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.743. The Commission expects that parties will include all substantive
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2001/da010734.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2001/da010734.txt
  • section 271 statutory requirements for a given state, the BOC may incorporate by reference its prior showing for those aspects, provided that it certifies in the subsequent application that its actions and performance at that time are consistent with the prior showing. See, e.g., Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3969, para. 53. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.49, 1.741-1.749. See id. at � 1.49. Item (e) is obviously the core portion of the Brief in Support, and may be quite lengthy. It may help to divide it, therefore, into three subsections, one corresponding to each of the three requirements set forth in section 271(d)(3). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.743. See Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • 1.56 1.62 1.44 1.63 1.76 1.75 1.77 1.76 1.77 1.78 1.84 1.85 1.86 1989 1.14 1.12 1.12 1.34 1.31 1.32 1.48 0.92 1.45 1.48 1.45 1.45 1.54 1.45 1.45 1.54 1.52 1.52 1.60 1.55 1.55 1.67 1.55 1.55 1.67 1.55 1.55 1990 1.14 1.12 1.12 1.34 1.30 1.30 1.45 1.38 1.40 1.45 1.38 1.40 1.45 1.38 1.40 1.45 1.40 1.40 1.49 1.40 1.40 1.49 1.40 1.40 1.49 1.40 1.40 1991 1.11 1.10 1.11 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.45 1.35 1.40 1.45 1.35 1.40 1.45 1.35 1.40 1.49 1.40 1.40 1.79 1.40 1.40 1.49 1.40 1.40 1992 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.40 1.34 1.40 1.40 1.34 1.40 1.40 1.34 1.40 1.40 1.35 1.40 1.40 1.35 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.50 1.48
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 1.56 1.44 1.56 1.62 1.44 1.63 1.76 1.75 1.77 1.76 1.77 1.78 1.84 1.85 1.86 19891.14 1.12 1.12 1.34 1.31 1.32 1.48 0.92 1.45 1.48 1.45 1.45 1.54 1.45 1.45 1.54 1.52 1.52 1.60 1.55 1.55 1.67 1.55 1.55 1.67 1.55 1.55 19901.14 1.12 1.12 1.34 1.30 1.30 1.45 1.38 1.40 1.45 1.38 1.40 1.45 1.38 1.40 1.45 1.40 1.40 1.49 1.40 1.40 1.49 1.40 1.40 1.49 1.40 1.40 19911.11 1.10 1.11 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.45 1.35 1.40 1.45 1.35 1.40 1.45 1.35 1.40 1.49 1.40 1.40 1.79 1.40 1.40 1.49 1.40 1.40 19921.30 1.30 1.30 1.40 1.34 1.40 1.40 1.34 1.40 1.40 1.34 1.40 1.40 1.35 1.40 1.40 1.35 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.50 1.48 1.50 1.50
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 1,343 2002 584 741 928 1,150 1,433 1980 2.61% 2.32% 2.18% 1.81% 1.51% 1981 2.96 2.52 2.24 1.95 1.55 1982 3.18 2.66 2.19 1.97 1.52 1983 3.13 2.82 2.24 2.02 1.55 1984 2.71 2.44 2.21 1.82 1.51 1985 2.72 2.41 2.20 1.81 1.39 1986 2.94 2.62 2.15 1.83 1.43 1987 3.24 2.57 2.31 1.85 1.44 1988 3.23 2.61 2.31 1.82 1.49 1989 3.05 2.61 2.30 1.88 1.43 1990 3.11 2.77 2.37 1.89 1.48 1991 3.08 2.80 2.28 1.84 1.45 1992 3.35 2.77 2.34 1.88 1.46 1993 3.27 2.70 2.45 1.96 1.53 1994 3.17 2.83 2.36 1.95 1.58 1995 3.38 2.71 2.41 1.99 1.55 1996 3.20 2.94 2.46 2.05 1.57 1997 3.24 3.02 2.53 2.09 1.63 1998 3.17 2.79 2.55 2.16 1.69
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 1,433 2003 564 768 932 1,142 1,441 1980 2.61% 2.32% 2.18% 1.81% 1.51% 1981 2.96 2.52 2.24 1.95 1.55 1982 3.18 2.66 2.19 1.97 1.52 1983 3.13 2.82 2.24 2.02 1.55 1984 2.71 2.44 2.21 1.82 1.51 1985 2.72 2.41 2.20 1.81 1.39 1986 2.94 2.62 2.15 1.83 1.43 1987 3.24 2.57 2.31 1.85 1.44 1988 3.23 2.61 2.31 1.82 1.49 1989 3.05 2.61 2.30 1.88 1.43 1990 3.11 2.77 2.37 1.89 1.48 1991 3.08 2.80 2.28 1.84 1.45 1992 3.35 2.77 2.34 1.88 1.46 1993 3.27 2.70 2.45 1.96 1.53 1994 3.17 2.83 2.36 1.95 1.58 1995 3.38 2.71 2.41 1.99 1.55 1996 3.20 2.94 2.46 2.05 1.57 1997 3.24 3.02 2.53 2.09 1.63 1998 3.17 2.79 2.55 2.16 1.69
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref97.pdf
  • with Subsidy Plan AverageSubsidy Plan Rate Benefit (a) (b) (c) (b) - (c) Unlimited local calling $13.62 $13.84 $8.99 Federal and state SLCs 3.54 3.47 0.23 Taxes and 911 charges 2.34 2.31 1.34 Total for rotary service 19.49 19.62 10.56 9.06 Lowest generally available rate 6.68 6.61 2.87 Federal and state SLCs 3.54 3.47 0.23 Taxes and 911 charges 1.56 1.49 0.65 Total for rotary service 11.79 11.57 3.75 7.82 Minimum connection charge 40.91 41.01 15.86 Taxes 2.42 2.51 1.00 Total for rotary service 43.33 43.52 16.86 26.66 Subsidized monthly service rate averages are for the 70 cities with subsidized monthly rates. These cities represent 73% of the sample weight. Subsidized connection charge averages are for the 90 cities with connection
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • 0.700.450.27 1.020.660.40 1.951.260.78 2.751.781.10 3.152.04 1.26 3.352.17 1.34 3.652.371.45 3.96 2.57 1.58 4.16 2.70 1.66 February 29, 1976 0.910.590.36 1.400.910.56 2.151.390.86 2.951.911.18 3.252.11 1.30 3.452.24 1.38 3.562.311.42 3.76 2.44 1.50 3.96 2.57 1.58 September 13, 19771.000.650.40 1.310.850.52 2.241.450.89 3.041.971.21 3.342.17 1.33 3.542.30 1.41 3.562.311.42 3.76 2.44 1.50 3.96 2.57 1.58 June 6, 1980 1.010.650.40 1.410.910.56 2.351.520.94 3.152.041.26 3.542.30 1.41 3.742.43 1.49 3.772.451.50 3.97 2.58 1.58 4.17 2.71 1.66 June 28, 1981 1.130.730.45 1.631.050.65 2.771.801.10 3.672.381.46 4.072.64 1.62 4.362.83 1.74 4.392.851.75 4.60 2.98 1.84 4.80 3.11 1.92 April 2, 1982 1.761.050.70 2.381.420.95 3.001.801.20 3.902.331.56 4.092.45 1.63 4.372.62 1.74 4.492.691.79 4.60 2.76 1.84 5.15 3.09 2.06 May 25, 1984 1.650.990.66 2.271.360.90 2.791.671.11 3.692.211.47 3.872.32 1.54 4.062.43 1.62 4.182.501.67 4.29 2.57 1.71 4.83 2.89
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 0.700.450.27 1.020.660.40 1.951.260.78 2.751.781.10 3.152.04 1.26 3.352.17 1.34 3.652.371.45 3.96 2.57 1.58 4.16 2.70 1.66 February 29, 1976 0.910.590.36 1.400.910.56 2.151.390.86 2.951.911.18 3.252.11 1.30 3.452.24 1.38 3.562.311.42 3.76 2.44 1.50 3.96 2.57 1.58 September 13, 19771.000.650.40 1.310.850.52 2.241.450.89 3.041.971.21 3.342.17 1.33 3.542.30 1.41 3.562.311.42 3.76 2.44 1.50 3.96 2.57 1.58 June 6, 1980 1.010.650.40 1.410.910.56 2.351.520.94 3.152.041.26 3.542.30 1.41 3.742.43 1.49 3.772.451.50 3.97 2.58 1.58 4.17 2.71 1.66 June 28, 1981 1.130.730.45 1.631.050.65 2.771.801.10 3.672.381.46 4.072.64 1.62 4.362.83 1.74 4.392.851.75 4.60 2.98 1.84 4.80 3.11 1.92 April 2, 1982 1.761.050.70 2.381.420.95 3.001.801.20 3.902.331.56 4.092.45 1.63 4.372.62 1.74 4.492.691.79 4.60 2.76 1.84 5.15 3.09 2.06 May 25, 1984 1.650.990.66 2.271.360.90 2.791.671.11 3.692.211.47 3.872.32 1.54 4.062.43 1.62 4.182.501.67 4.29 2.57 1.71 4.83 2.89
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror00.pdf
  • Mexico #1164 20.57 63 VALOR New Mexico #1193 13.41 64 VALOR Oklahoma 11.17 65 VALOR Texas 6.70 Maximum Rate of Return 47.71%43.42%47.21%48.69%42.53%47.29%32.60%22.33%17.72%17.27% Minimum Rate of Return (11.23) (9.93) (6.85) (25.83) (24.03) (16.99) (15.37) 7.05 8.51 8.54 Weighted Arithmetic Mean 19.53 18.50 16.52 15.60 15.15 14.02 13.58 13.12 12.42 11.78 Standard Deviation 5.987 5.96 5.13 3.96 3.64 3.03 2.59 1.76 0.96 1.49 * The interstate rates of return reported by carriers on the FCC Form 492A may not necessarily agree with the interstate rates of return reported by the carriers on other Commission forms. For example, price-cap carriers also report interstate rates of return on the Commission's Automated Reporting Management Information System's (ARMIS) 43-01 report. The interstate rates of return reported by
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
  • 9.82 14.18 234.12 12.02 14.56 60CITIZENS TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.83 13.97 7.10 11.09 4.57 9.93 61EAST ASCENSION TELEPHONE CO. 12.35 13.90 7.42 4.21 38.55 11.14 62GREAT PLAINS COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 12.58 12.55 9.24 13.39 200.00 12.43 13.03 63GRIDLEY TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.62 13.90 14.34 5.60 11.37 6.63 64ILLINOIS CONSOLIDATED TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.72 13.57 24.74 11.74 (300.00) 4.83 7.52 65KERMAN TELEPHONE COMPANY 12.49 13.90 (1.49) 10.72 13.07 10.94 66LINCOLN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY 12.80 13.57 9.75 13.44 11.95 12.76 67MOULTRIE INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.94 13.90 11.97 6.23 11.02 68PLAINS COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE ASSN. 9.91 13.90 4.18 8.16 6.50 7.36 69ROCHESTER TELEPHONE CORPORATION 10.89 11.39 5.93 12.64 (261.54) 12.93 12.67 70ROCHESTER TELEPHONE CORPORATION SUBSIDIARIES 11.60 11.39 16.67 12.20 10.66 11.76 RATE OF RETURN DATA JANUARY 1, 1989
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror97.pdf
  • 23.71 21.90 19.65 14.99 13.65 13.71 75 SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE COMPANY 24/ 12.70 11.64 11.58 11.34 11.52 12.90 8.56 MAXIMUM RATE OF RETURN 48.86% 42.53% 47.29% 32.60% 22.33% 17.72% 17.27% MINIMUM RATE OF RETURN (28.51) (24.03) (16.99) (15.37) 7.05 8.51 8.54 WEIGHTED ARITHMETIC MEAN 15.64 15.15 14.02 13.58 13.12 12.42 11.78 STANDARD DEVIATION 4.09 3.64 3.03 2.59 1.76 0.96 1.49 INTERSTATE RATE OF RETURN SUMMARY YEARS 1991 THROUGH 1997 PRICE CAP COMPANIES FINAL REPORTS FOR 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996 AND INITIAL REPORT FOR 1997 1/ AT&T COMMUNICATIONS FILED INDIVIDUAL REPORTS FOR 1991 - 1994 NINETY DAYS AFTER END OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR. THE LOCAL TELEPHONE COMPANIES FILED FINAL REPORTS FOR EACH YEAR FIFTEEN MONTHS AFTER THE CALENDAR YEAR.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror98.pdf
  • FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF MINNESOTA & IOWA 25/ 26/ 29.28 28.26 23.71 21.90 19.65 14.99 13.65 13.71 MAXIMUM RATE OF RETURN 48.40% 48.69% 42.53% 47.29% 32.60% 22.33% 17.72% 17.27% MINIMUM RATE OF RETURN (5.40) (25.83) (24.03) (16.99) (15.37) 7.05 8.51 8.54 WEIGHTED ARITHMETIC MEAN 15.94 15.60 15.15 14.02 13.58 13.12 12.42 11.78 STANDARD DEVIATION 6.08 3.96 3.64 3.03 2.59 1.76 0.96 1.49 INTERSTATE RATE OF RETURN SUMMARY YEARS 1991 THROUGH 1998 PRICE CAP COMPANIES FINAL REPORTS FOR 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, AND INITIAL REPORT FOR 1998 PREPARED BY KATIE RANGOS, INDUSTRY ANALYSIS DIVISION, MAY 13, 1999. 1/ AT&T COMMUNICATIONS FILED INDIVIDUAL REPORTS FOR 1991 - 1994 NINETY DAYS AFTER END OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR. THE LOCAL TELEPHONE COMPANIES FILED
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror99.pdf
  • of Minnesota & Iowa 29/ 30/ 35.40 29.28 28.26 23.71 21.90 19.65 15 13.7 13.71 Maximum Rate of Return 43.42% 47.21% 48.69% 42.53% 47.29% 32.60%22.33%17.72%17.27% Minimum Rate of Return (10.09) (6.85) (25.83) (24.03) (16.99) (15.37) 7.05 8.51 8.54 Weighted Arithmetic Mean 18.52 16.52 15.60 15.15 14.02 13.58 13.12 12.42 11.78 Standard Deviation 5.98 5.13 3.96 3.64 3.03 2.59 1.76 0.96 1.49 * BellSouth has been contacted about their 1998 rate of return. However, the said they will not be able to verify the number reported until Monday, April 10th. Notes. 1/ AT&T Communications filed individual reports for 1991 - 1994 ninety days after end of each calendar year. The local telephone companies filed final reports for each year fifteen months after
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-95.pdf
  • 370 0.19 Alaska and Other Territories na na 1,977 0.99 Total $85,319 $111,709 $199,005 100.00 -8 Table 2 Retail Revenue Interstate Instrastate Interstate + Intrastate Percent of Total (millions) (millions) (millions) ALABAMA $868 $1,500 $2,368 1.42 ARIZONA 1,232 1,225 2,457 1.47 ARKANSAS 526 803 1,329 0.80 CALIFORNIA 6,322 13,488 19,810 11.86 COLORADO 1,236 1,465 2,701 1.62 CONNECTICUT 1,082 1,406 2,488 1.49 DELAWARE 237 198 435 0.26 DC 372 409 781 0.47 FLORIDA 4,099 5,860 9,959 5.96 GEORGIA 2,085 2,884 4,968 2.97 HAWAII 269 424 694 0.42 IDAHO 321 329 650 0.39 ILLINOIS 2,701 4,408 7,109 4.26 INDIANA 1,177 2,070 3,248 1.94 IOWA 629 908 1,538 0.92 KANSAS 629 904 1,533 0.92 KENTUCKY 892 1,381 2,274 1.36 LOUISIANA 871 1,552 2,423 1.45
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-96.pdf
  • 1.07 MISSOURI 93.07 1.07 MONTANA 69.45 1.44 NEBRASKA 87.30 1.15 NEVADA 95.50 1.05 NEW HAMPSHIRE 93.93 1.06 NEW JERSEY 99.85 1.00 NEW MEXICO 90.07 1.11 NEW YORK 96.81 1.03 NORTH CAROLINA 86.20 1.16 NORTH DAKOTA 58.63 1.71 OHIO 86.27 1.16 OKLAHOMA 88.40 1.13 OREGON 91.92 1.09 PENNSYLVANIA 94.69 1.06 RHODE ISLAND 100.00 1.00 SOUTH CAROLINA 74.30 1.35 SOUTH DAKOTA 66.91 1.49 TENNESSEE 87.68 1.14 TEXAS 94.19 1.06 UTAH 95.66 1.05 VERMONT 84.15 1.19 VIRGINIA 97.33 1.03 WASHINGTON 91.03 1.10 WEST VIRGINIA 83.13 1.20 WISCONSIN 81.43 1.23 WYOMING 82.42 1.21 UNITED STATES 93.00 1.08 GUAM N/A N/A N. MARIANA ISL. N/A N/A PUERTO RICO 100.00 1.00 VIRGIN ISLANDS N/A N/A GRAND TOTAL 93.00 1.08 FIGURES MAY NOT ADD UP DUE TO ROUNDING.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-97.pdf
  • CAROLINA 23,681 0.92 11,794 0.46 11,887 0.46 SOUTH DAKOTA 3,160 0.65 2,497 0.51 663 0.14 TENNESSEE 8,152 0.21 16,486 0.42 (8,334) (0.21) TEXAS 75,838 0.53 50,820 0.35 25,018 0.17 UTAH 2,982 0.23 6,281 0.48 (3,299) (0.25) VERMONT 4,144 0.88 2,433 0.51 1,711 0.36 VIRGINIA 4,780 0.09 24,490 0.47 (19,709) (0.37) WASHINGTON 23,443 0.56 18,079 0.43 5,363 0.13 WEST VIRGINIA 17,173 1.49 4,806 0.42 12,368 1.07 WISCONSIN 13,109 0.33 13,319 0.34 (210) (0.01) WYOMING 12,502 3.67 1,987 0.58 10,514 3.08 UNITED STATES 767,327 0.37 826,479 0.40 (59,152) (0.03) GUAM 0 0.00 350 0.40 (350) (0.40) N. MARIANA ISL. 3,601 14.54 45 0.18 3,556 14.36 PUERTO RICO 48,786 3.24 3,691 0.24 45,095 2.99 VIRGIN ISLANDS 11,316 15.48 465 0.64 10,850 14.85 GRAND TOTAL
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-99.pdf
  • 1.61 22,423 1.96 New York 102,139 0.66 196,223 1.28 -94,084 -0.61 North Carolina 40,006 0.65 80,380 1.32 -40,374 -0.66 North Dakota 25,975 5.18 7,583 1.51 18,393 3.67 Ohio 33,475 0.40 93,995 1.12 -60,520 -0.72 Oklahoma 66,651 2.66 30,106 1.20 36,545 1.46 Oregon 49,801 1.95 35,679 1.40 14,122 0.55 Pennsylvania 33,328 0.33 113,584 1.12 -80,255 -0.79 Rhode Island 4,345 0.53 12,131 1.49 -7,786 -0.96 South Carolina 52,152 1.87 39,504 1.41 12,648 0.45 South Dakota 21,841 4.24 8,416 1.63 13,425 2.61 Tennessee 37,854 0.92 52,887 1.28 -15,033 -0.36 Texas 161,793 1.02 172,534 1.09 -10,741 -0.07 Utah 14,130 1.00 21,137 1.50 -7,007 -0.50 Vermont 28,619 5.73 7,736 1.55 20,883 4.18 Virginia 39,134 0.68 82,155 1.44 -43,021 -0.75 Washington 58,734 1.31 61,457 1.37 -2,724 -0.06
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend100.pdf
  • Code* USN Communications 65 $17.5 3.71 2 North American Telephone 58 17.5 3.31 2 Minimum Rate Pricing 344 112.0 3.07 4 RSL COM USA, Inc. 444 183.6 2.42 1 Quest Communications 34 17.5 1.94 2 Equal Net Corporation 31 17.5 1.77 2 Flat Rate Long Distance 65 37.5 1.73 2 Consumer Access 29 17.5 1.66 2 QAI, Inc. 56 37.5 1.49 2 I-Link Communication 22 17.5 1.26 2 Long Distance International, Inc. 38 37.5 1.01 2 Frontier Communications Services 346 538.8 0.64 1 Matrix Telecom 20 37.5 0.53 2 Qwest Communications 648 1,664.2 0.39 1 Lifeline 30 81.0 0.37 2 US Long Distance, Inc. 95 279.1 0.34 1 Excel Communications 336 1,218.7 0.28 1 Tel-Save, Inc. 107 425.9 0.25 1 GTE
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend199.pdf
  • 23.71 21.90 19.65 14.99 13.65 13.71 75 SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE COMPANY 24/ 12.70 11.64 11.58 11.34 11.52 12.90 8.56 MAXIMUM RATE OF RETURN 48.86% 42.53% 47.29% 32.60% 22.33% 17.72% 17.27% MINIMUM RATE OF RETURN (28.51) (24.03) (16.99) (15.37) 7.05 8.51 8.54 WEIGHTED ARITHMETIC MEAN 15.64 15.15 14.02 13.58 13.12 12.42 11.78 STANDARD DEVIATION 4.09 3.64 3.03 2.59 1.76 0.96 1.49 15 - 4 NOTES FOR TABLE 15.1. 1/ AT&T COMMUNICATIONS FILED INDIVIDUAL REPORTS FOR 1991 - 1994 NINETY DAYS AFTER END OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR. THE LOCAL TELEPHONE COMPANIES FILED FINAL REPORTS FOR EACH YEAR FIFTEEN MONTHS AFTER THE CALENDAR YEAR. 2/ BELL ATLANTIC FILED A REVISED 1997 REPORT APRIL 29, 1998. 3/ IN 1992, NYNEX STARTED TO FILE A
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • of Minnesota & Iowa 29/ 30/ 35.40 29.28 28.26 23.71 21.90 19.65 15 13.7 13.71 Maximum Rate of Return 43.42% 47.21% 48.69% 42.53% 47.29% 32.60%22.33%17.72%17.27% Minimum Rate of Return (10.09) (6.85) (25.83) (24.03) (16.99) (15.37) 7.05 8.51 8.54 Weighted Arithmetic Mean 18.52 16.52 15.60 15.15 14.02 13.58 13.12 12.42 11.78 Standard Deviation 5.98 5.13 3.96 3.64 3.03 2.59 1.76 0.96 1.49 4 - 4 Notes to Table 4.1. 1/ AT&T Communications filed individual reports for 1991-1994 ninety days after end of each calendar year. The local telephone companies filed final reports for each year fifteen months after the calendar year. 2/ Bell Atlantic filed revised reports August 12, 1999 reflecting the reassignment of expenses and revenues associated with internet service provider
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend298.pdf
  • 23.71 21.90 19.65 14.99 13.65 13.71 75 SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE COMPANY 24/ 12.70 11.64 11.58 11.34 11.52 12.90 8.56 MAXIMUM RATE OF RETURN 48.86% 42.53% 47.29% 32.60% 22.33% 17.72% 17.27% MINIMUM RATE OF RETURN (28.51) (24.03) (16.99) (15.37) 7.05 8.51 8.54 WEIGHTED ARITHMETIC MEAN 15.64 15.15 14.02 13.58 13.12 12.42 11.78 STANDARD DEVIATION 4.09 3.64 3.03 2.59 1.76 0.96 1.49 77 NOTES FOR TABLE 14.1. 1/ AT&T COMMUNICATIONS FILED INDIVIDUAL REPORTS FOR 1991 - 1994 NINETY DAYS AFTER END OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR. THE LOCAL TELEPHONE COMPANIES FILED FINAL REPORTS FOR EACH YEAR FIFTEEN MONTHS AFTER THE CALENDAR YEAR. 2/ BELL ATLANTIC FILED A REVISED 1997 REPORT APRIL 29, 1998. 3/ IN 1992, NYNEX STARTED TO FILE A COMBINED REPORT.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend299.pdf
  • 2.95 1939 22 26 13.9 2.53 2.99 1940 21 26 14.0 2.45 2.97 1941 21 26 14.7 2.30 2.83 1942 22 26 16.3 2.16 2.55 1943 21 22 17.3 1.98 2.07 1944 22 22 17.6 1.99 2.04 1945 21 22 18.0 1.92 1.99 1946 20 22 19.5 1.65 1.84 1947 19 22 22.3 1.40 1.61 1948 19 22 24.1 1.26 1.49 1949 19 22 23.8 1.29 1.51 1950 19 22 24.1 1.31 1.49 1951 20 22 26.0 1.26 1.38 1952 20 22 26.5 1.24 1.35 1953 21 22 26.7 1.27 1.34 1954 22 22 26.9 1.35 1.33 1955 23 22 26.8 1.40 1.34 1956 23 22 27.2 1.40 1.32 1957 24 22 28.1 1.38 1.28 1958 24 22 28.9 1.35 1.24
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
  • five and added to multiline business counts. 1 - 7 Table 1.4 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges by Carrier (In Cents per Minute) 1/ Rates Effective from 01/01/02-06/30/02 Year 2000 Minutes of Use Carrier (Millions) Common Line per Company Originating Access CCL CCL Local Minute OriginatingTerminatingSwitching BellSouth 0.00� 0.00� 0.36� 0.18� 1.10� 27,845 57,012 83,187 Cincinnati Bell 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.21 1.49 1,042 2,162 3,215 Citizens 0.57 0.00 0.87 0.65 3.69 2,747 2,865 5,680 Global Crossing 0.05 0.00 0.61 0.41 2.15 575 1,583 2,160 Iowa Telecom 0.81 0.00 0.84 0.15 2.90 134 185 331 Qwest 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.18 1.47 21,018 39,686 61,107 SBC 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.21 1.30 64,610 92,623 158,985 Sprint 0.03 0.00 0.63 0.17 1.68 10,375 15,681 26,235 Verizon
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • 113.6 0.25 0.39 1948 24.1 0.19 1.39 1988 118.3 0.23 0.36 1949 23.8 0.19 1.42 1989 124.0 0.22 0.32 1950 24.1 0.19 1.44 1990 130.7 0.20 0.28 1951 26.0 0.20 1.39 1991 136.2 0.20 0.26 1952 26.5 0.20 1.37 1992 140.3 0.19 0.25 $1.01 $0.15 $0.09 1953 26.7 0.21 1.40 1993 144.5 0.19 0.24 1.02 0.15 0.09 1954 26.9 0.22 1.49 1994 148.2 0.18 0.22 0.93 0.14 0.08 1955 26.8 0.23 1.54 1995 152.4 0.17 0.20 0.91 0.12 0.07 1956 27.2 0.23 1.55 1996 156.9 0.16 0.19 0.76 0.12 0.08 1957 28.1 0.24 1.52 1997 160.5 0.15 0.16 0.69 0.11 0.06 1958 28.9 0.24 1.49 1998 163.0 0.14 0.16 0.58 0.11 0.08 1959 29.1 0.24 1.50 1999 166.6 0.14 0.15 0.54
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • 0.11 0.06 1958 28.9 0.24 1.52 1998 163.0 0.14 0.16 0.58 0.11 0.08 1959 29.1 0.24 1.53 1999 166.6 0.14 0.16 0.54 0.11 0.08 1960 29.6 0.24 1.50 2000 172.2 0.12 0.13 0.52 0.09 0.06 1961 29.9 0.25 1.53 2001 177.1 0.10 0.11 0.35 0.08 0.06 1962 30.2 0.25 1.54 2002 179.9 0.09 0.09 0.28 0.07 0.05 1963 30.6 0.25 1.49 2003 184.0 0.08 0.08 0.20 0.07 0.05 1964 31.0 0.25 1.48 1965 31.5 0.24 1.40 1966 32.4 0.24 1.38 1967 33.4 0.24 1.34 1968 34.8 0.24 1.25 1969 36.7 0.24 1.20 Note: Data for some prior years have been revised. 1/ Starting in 1992, billed revenue per minute for international service differs in Table 6.1 and Table 13.4. Data in
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
  • five and added to multiline business counts. 1 - 7 Table 1.4 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges by Carrier (In Cents per Minute) 1/ Rates Effective from 7/1/01-12/31/01 Year 2000 Minutes of Use Carrier (Millions) Common Line per Company Originating Access CCL CCL Local Minute OriginatingTerminatingSwitching BellSouth 0.00� 0.00� 0.36� 0.18� 1.10� 27,845 57,012 83,187 Cincinnati Bell 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.21 1.49 1,042 2,162 3,215 Citizens 0.57 0.00 0.87 0.65 3.69 2,747 2,865 5,680 Global Crossing 0.05 0.00 0.61 0.41 2.15 575 1,583 2,160 Iowa Telecom 0.81 0.00 0.84 0.15 2.90 134 185 331 Qwest 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.18 1.47 21,018 39,686 61,107 SBC 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.21 1.30 64,610 92,623 158,985 Sprint 0.03 0.00 0.63 0.17 1.68 10,375 15,681 26,235 Verizon
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • Health Care Providers receive. These service descriptions are rolled up into the categories above. Some inferences were made when service speed was not clearly indicated. For example, frame relay was assumed to be broadband in the range of 200Kbps to 1.5 Mbps, even though some frame relay service speeds may be faster. Other Service Unknown 2 Broadband 2 200K to 1.49Mb or Speed 1.5Mb 199K 19 - 8 Year 1998First Quarter 3.19 % 0.72% Second Quarter 3.14 0.76 Third Quarter 3.14 0.75 Fourth Quarter 3.18 0.75 1999First Quarter 3.18 0.58 Second Quarter 3.05 0.57 Third Quarter 2.94 0.99 Fourth Quarter 2.887 1.10 5.89952 2000First Quarter 5.8770 Second Quarter 5.7101 Third Quarter 5.5360 Fourth Quarter 5.6688 2001First Quarter 6.6827 Second Quarter 6.8823
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd00.pdf
  • 1.88 1.56 1.38 1.01 0.96 0.81 0.66 Israel 1.36 1.32 1.35 1.34 1.25 1.10 1.16 0.98 1.01 0.79 0.47 Italy 1.07 1.05 1.08 1.08 1.05 1.02 1.00 0.79 0.74 0.70 0.59 Jamaica 1.00 1.08 1.06 1.06 1.05 1.05 1.03 0.91 0.80 0.74 0.64 Japan 1.39 1.34 1.35 1.32 1.23 1.05 1.00 0.76 0.62 0.47 0.45 Korea, Republic of 1.51 1.46 1.49 1.46 1.36 1.15 1.09 0.93 0.89 0.81 0.70 Mexico 9/ 1.08 1.02 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.93 0.85 0.74 0.67 0.60 0.50 Morocco 1.19 1.35 1.20 1.36 1.33 1.23 1.35 1.19 1.27 0.84 0.73 Netherlands 1.14 1.07 1.06 1.03 1.02 0.86 0.78 0.57 0.50 0.40 0.44 Nigeria 0.96 1.09 1.06 1.14 1.17 1.09 1.08 0.86 0.79 0.68 0.67 Pakistan 1.79 1.76
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • NTS Revenue Loop Support NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Jurisdiction Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* Alabama 6.87 -1.45 8.45 15.40 Alaska 3.24 1.14 2.07 2.32 American Samoa 27.70 3.48 23.40 INFINITE Arizona 3.24 -1.39 4.70 11.88 Arkansas 5.08 -2.49 7.76 18.30 California 7.83 -1.65 9.64 2.63 Colorado 1.06 -1.88 2.99 7.93 Connecticut 0.83 -5.72 6.94 0.00 Delaware 2.68 -1.49 4.23 0.00 District Of Columbia -0.22 -0.54 0.32 0.00 Florida 4.59 -1.46 6.14 10.47 Georgia 6.39 -2.60 9.23 -2.49 Guam -9.34 0.00 -9.34 0.00 Hawaii 10.84 -0.31 11.19 217.38 Idaho 2.95 -0.88 3.87 3.72 Illinois -1.64 -2.42 0.80 24.24 Indiana 0.20 2.54 -2.28 8.39 Iowa 1.25 -1.41 2.70 33.47 Kansas 0.95 -3.83 4.96 14.79 Kentucky 2.14 -0.84 3.00 -2.35 Louisiana
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-5.pdf
  • speed information for Funding Years 2000 through 2002. In some instances, the service speed was not clearly identifiable, such as with frame relay service. Where possible, the most likely speed for that service was chosen. For example, Frame Relay theoretically could be provided at voice grade speeds, but the vast majority of it is provided at broadband speeds (200K to 1.49Mb), so Frame Relay was assumed to be broadband at that level. Table 5.3 shows, for Funding Years 2000 and 2001, on a state-by-state basis, disbursements from the Rural Health Care Support Mechanism, the population of the rural counties, and the disbursements per person in rural counties. Table 5.1 Rural Health Care Funding Commitments and Authorizations by State Funding Year 2000:
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-9.pdf
  • 460.8 For Unscheduled Events Over 2 Minutes 88.0 78.0 29.5 3.2 44.7 33.6 30.3 118.9 381.1 For Unscheduled Downtime More Than 2 Minutes Number of Occurrences or Events 33 42 25 8 11 26 13 42 71 Events per Hundred Switches 2.0 3.1 1.7 1.0 0.7 2.0 1.0 1.3 4.5 Events per Million Access Lines 1.44 2.68 1.31 0.46 0.72 1.49 0.61 2.49 8.93 Average Outage Duration in Minutes 72.7 41.4 28.6 5.1 111.8 27.6 52.2 147.7 139.8 Average Lines Affected per Event in Thousands 21.8 6.3 28.1 37.5 23.8 23.7 22.2 6.9 12.3 Outage Line-Minutes per Event in Thousands 766.9 218.7 644.9 171.9 2,900.1 483.1 163.6 859.8 1,896.0 Outage Line-Minutes per 1,000 Access Lines 1,102.5 585.7 841.9 79.7 2,085.8 720.1
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 2,159 450 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 706,712 0.50 314 66 336 70 Idaho 568,555 0.40 253 53 270 56 Illinois 6,298,548 4.45 2,801 592 2,992 624 Indiana 2,456,469 1.74 1,092 231 1,167 243 Iowa 1,299,463 0.92 578 122 617 129 Kansas 1,092,975 0.77 486 103 519 108 Kentucky 1,764,954 1.25 785 166 838 175 Louisiana 2,106,263 1.49 937 198 1,001 209 Maine 516,702 0.37 230 49 245 51 Maryland 2,970,267 2.10 1,321 279 1,411 294 Massachusetts 3,438,844 2.43 1,529 323 1,634 341 Michigan 4,674,299 3.31 2,079 440 2,221 463 Minnesota 2,527,653 1.79 1,124 238 1,201 251 Mississippi 1,112,483 0.79 495 105 528 110 Missouri 2,653,371 1.88 1,180 250 1,260 263 Montana 346,187 0.24 154 33 164 34
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-2.pdf
  • 8.25 13.50 13.32 Missouri 7.04 8.25 7.35 0.00 1.14 0.84 0.00 0.57 0.42 7.04 8.82 7.77 7.04 9.96 8.60 Montana 8.24 8.25 8.24 0.00 3.50 3.06 0.00 1.75 1.53 8.24 10.00 9.78 8.24 13.50 12.84 Nebraska 6.51 8.25 7.08 0.00 3.50 3.47 0.00 1.75 1.74 6.51 10.00 8.82 6.51 13.50 12.29 Nevada 5.25 8.25 6.47 0.00 3.50 2.99 0.00 1.75 1.49 5.25 10.00 7.96 5.25 13.50 10.95 New Hampshire 8.20 8.25 8.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.20 8.25 8.20 8.20 8.25 8.20 New Jersey 7.38 8.06 8.05 0.00 3.44 3.41 0.00 1.72 1.70 7.38 9.78 9.76 7.38 13.22 13.17 New Mexico 7.92 8.25 8.24 0.00 3.50 3.31 0.00 1.75 1.65 7.92 10.00 9.89 7.92 13.50 13.20 New York 6.17
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • 542338 C SIERRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. 10.30 2.25 7.87 13.91 542339 C THE SISKIYOU TELEPHONE CO. 5.48 0.00 5.48 6.25 542343 C VOLCANO TELEPHONE COMPANY -0.46 2.19 -2.59 -10.86 542344 C VERIZON WEST COAST INC.-CA 2.68 -0.86 3.58 0.00 542346 C PINNACLES TELEPHONE COMPANY 32.70 5.32 25.99 38.75 543402 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF GOLDEN ST DBA FRONTIER COM 5.35 1.49 3.81 4.38 544342 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF TUOLUMNE DBA FRONTIER COMM -2.61 3.89 -6.26 -14.82 545170 C PACIFIC BELL -1.17 -3.40 2.30 0.00 3 - 172 Table 3.31 High-Cost Loop Support Percentage Changes from 2001 to 2002 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Loop Support NTS Revenue of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-5.pdf
  • Universal Service Support Mechanisms Fund Size Projections for the Third Quarter 2004, at 19. 21 See Table 5.2. 5 - 4 frame relay service. Where possible, the most likely speed for that service was chosen. For example, Frame Relay theoretically could be provided at voice grade speeds, but the vast majority of it is provided at broadband speeds (200K to 1.49Mb), so Frame Relay was assumed to be broadband at that level. Table 5.4 shows, for Funding Years 2001 and 2002, on a state-by-state basis, disbursements from the Rural Health Care Support Mechanism, the population of the rural areas, and the disbursements per person in rural areas. Table 5.1 Rural Health Care Funding Disbursements by Funding Year Voice Grade Broadband Other
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-7.pdf
  • 2.95 1939 22 26 13.9 2.53 2.99 1940 21 26 14.0 2.45 2.97 1941 21 26 14.7 2.30 2.83 1942 22 26 16.3 2.16 2.55 1943 21 22 17.3 1.98 2.07 1944 22 22 17.6 1.99 2.04 1945 21 22 18.0 1.92 1.99 1946 20 22 19.5 1.65 1.84 1947 19 22 22.3 1.40 1.61 1948 19 22 24.1 1.26 1.49 1949 19 22 23.8 1.29 1.51 1950 19 22 24.1 1.31 1.49 1951 20 22 26.0 1.26 1.38 1952 20 22 26.5 1.24 1.35 1953 21 22 26.7 1.27 1.34 1954 22 22 26.9 1.35 1.33 1955 23 22 26.8 1.40 1.34 1956 23 22 27.2 1.40 1.32 1957 24 22 28.1 1.38 1.28 1958 24 22 28.9 1.35 1.24
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • 19.30 Arkansas 4.90 5.57 -0.63 -8.54 California 0.96 2.32 -1.33 6.43 Colorado 4.50 3.89 0.59 -1.51 Connecticut 6.64 10.11 -3.15 0.00 Delaware 8.94 4.40 4.34 0.00 District of Columbia 5.38 -0.81 6.24 0.00 Florida 4.26 3.20 1.03 22.50 Georgia 5.25 4.07 1.13 5.03 Guam -2.42 3.41 -5.63 -91.10 Hawaii -3.13 0.63 -3.73 86.10 Idaho -1.32 3.74 -4.88 -6.99 Illinois 1.02 1.49 -0.46 21.79 Indiana -0.19 2.57 -2.69 -13.42 Iowa -1.21 2.22 -3.36 49.61 Kansas 6.39 4.21 2.09 20.31 Kentucky 1.34 2.71 -1.33 -41.18 Louisiana 1.92 2.23 -0.30 0.21 Maine -3.32 4.48 -7.46 6.52 Maryland 0.83 5.64 -4.55 0.00 Massachusetts 8.46 1.61 6.75 -10.77 Michigan 3.95 1.84 2.08 -3.06 Minnesota 1.90 2.58 -0.66 9.69 Mississippi 3.55 3.69 -0.14 6.92 Missouri 4.13 5.09
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • 0.00 3,756 0.52 -3,756 -0.52 Dist. of Columbia 0 0 0 0.00 5,431 0.49 -5,431 -0.49 Florida 12,971 0 12,971 0.09 64,295 0.47 -51,325 -0.37 Georgia 48,044 0 48,044 0.76 31,264 0.49 16,780 0.26 Guam 384 0 384 0.43 318 0.36 66 0.07 Hawaii 1,277 0 1,277 0.15 3,858 0.44 -2,580 -0.30 Idaho 18,772 0 18,772 2.03 4,973 0.54 13,799 1.49 Illinois 8,157 0 8,157 0.08 42,635 0.43 -34,478 -0.35 Indiana 4,366 0 4,366 0.10 17,843 0.40 -13,477 -0.30 Iowa 5,684 0 5,684 0.27 8,559 0.41 -2,876 -0.14 Kansas 48,929 0 48,929 2.35 9,098 0.44 39,830 1.92 Kentucky 8,032 0 8,032 0.30 11,903 0.45 -3,870 -0.14 Louisiana 44,796 0 44,796 1.43 12,708 0.41 32,089 1.02 Maine 7,748 0 7,748 0.74 4,522
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/QualSvc/qual02.pdf
  • 460.8 For Unscheduled Events Over 2 Minutes 90.3 78.0 29.5 3.2 44.7 33.6 30.3 21.8 381.1 For Unscheduled Downtime More Than 2 Minutes Number of Occurrences or Events 34 42 25 8 11 26 13 13 71 Events per Hundred Switches 2.1 3.1 1.7 1.0 0.7 2.0 1.0 0.4 4.5 Events per Million Access Lines 1.48 2.68 1.31 0.46 0.72 1.49 0.61 0.77 8.93 Average Outage Duration in Minutes per Event 72.4 41.4 28.6 5.1 111.8 27.6 52.2 88.4 139.8 Average Lines Affected per Event in Thousands 21.7 6.3 28.1 37.5 23.8 23.7 22.2 5.1 12.3 Outage Line-Minute per Event in Thousands 777.3 218.7 644.9 171.9 2,900.1 483.1 163.6 234.1 1,896.0 Outage Line-Minute per 1,000 Access Lines 1,151.3 585.7 841.9 79.7
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/00socc.pdf
  • 1.40 0.52 1.04 1989AT&T 1.252.500.841.680.671.33 1.20 2.40 0.80 1.61 0.63 1.26 1.11 2.21 0.74 1.48 0.60 1.20 MCI 1.22 2.45 0.77 1.55 0.62 1.25 1.17 2.35 0.77 1.55 0.61 1.22 1.07 2.15 0.72 1.45 0.57 1.15 Sprint 1.22 2.45 0.77 1.55 0.62 1.25 1.17 2.35 0.77 1.55 0.61 1.22 1.10 2.20 0.72 1.45 0.57 1.15 1990AT&T 1.252.490.751.500.681.36 1.20 2.39 0.75 1.49 0.65 1.31 1.08 2.15 0.73 1.45 0.60 1.21 MCI 1.20 2.40 0.70 1.40 0.62 1.25 1.15 2.30 0.70 1.40 0.61 1.22 1.05 2.10 0.69 1.38 0.57 1.15 Sprint 1.20 2.40 0.70 1.40 0.65 1.30 1.15 2.30 0.70 1.40 0.62 1.25 1.05 2.10 0.70 1.40 0.60 1.20 1991AT&T 1.232.460.751.500.681.36 1.15 2.30 0.75 1.50 0.65 1.31 1.05 2.10 0.73 1.45 0.60 1.21
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/01socc.pdf
  • 123.6 118.0 5.7 (0.50) (0.21) 0.46 (0.26) 5.9MS Missouri 479.6 363.8 115.8 84.1 31.7 11.52 3.51 5.02 20.05 11.6MO Montana 10.4 9.4 1.0 (0.3) 1.3 0.03 (0.17) (0.37) (0.51) 1.8MT Nebraska 131.3 49.5 81.8 60.4 21.4 8.13 3.37 6.21 17.71 3.7NE Nevada 122.2 77.0 45.2 31.6 13.6 2.57 2.17 0.67 5.40 8.2NV New Hampshire 38.9 17.7 21.2 8.4 12.8 3.43 1.49 3.06 7.98 4.8NH New Jersey 366.9 224.3 142.6 55.9 86.7 25.34 8.39 19.28 53.01 33.7NJ New Mexico 60.2 33.7 26.5 20.3 6.2 1.97 0.20 (0.07) 2.10 4.1NM New York 1,462.4 297.5 1,164.9 795.2 369.7 101.21 29.54 162.49 293.24 76.5NY North Carolina 389.9 275.9 113.9 81.9 32.1 11.12 2.71 4.38 18.21 13.9NC North Dakota 15.3 5.3 10.0 7.0 3.0 1.64 0.52
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/02socc.pdf
  • Data Incorporated Int'l Inc. Inc. 4/ Inc. Revenues $992 $15,385 $43,138 $26,634 $67,625 Costs and Expenses 2,905 34,282 34,515 24,534 52,628 Interest Expense 64 1,789 1,382 1,406 3,237 Other Income and Adjustments 2/ 2,551 (20,282) 1,426 (103) (6,063) Income Taxes 0 (2,500) 2,984 (39) 1,618 Net Income (Loss) 574 (38,468) 5,653 630 4,079 Earnings per Share n.m. (22.87) 1.70 1.36 1.49 Dividends per Share n.m. 0 1.08 0.50 1.54 Average Shares Outstanding (millions) n.m. 1,682 3,330 892 2,745 Property, Plant and Equipment - Net 1,203 18,995 48,490 28,745 74,496 Total Assets 2,000 29,345 95,057 45,293 167,468 Long-Term Debt 705 19,754 18,536 18,405 44,791 Shareholders' Equity 776 (2,830) 33,199 12,294 32,616 Operating Data Customer Lines (thousands) - 3/ 16,500 3/ 57,083 8,100
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/03socc.pdf
  • 21, 2002. In April 2003, the Interest Expense 3,237 190 company began doing business as MCI, and it Other Income and Adjustments1 (6,063) 21,900 adopted fresh-start reporting as of year's end Income Taxes 1,618 407 As the company emerged from bankruptcy on Net Income (Loss) 4,079 22,211 April 20, 2004, it merged with and into MCI, Inc., Earnings per Share 1.49 n.a. and WorldCom as a separate entity ceased to Dividends per Share 1.54 n.a. exist. Average Shares Outstanding (millions) 2,745 n.a. Property, Plant and Equipment - Net 74,496 11,758 Total Assets 167,468 27,367 Long-Term Debt 44,791 7,117 Shareholders' Equity 32,616 8,472 Operating Data Customer Lines (thousands)2 60,276 - Number of Employees 229,500 56,600 n.a. - not available. 1 Includes extraordinary
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/95socc.pdf
  • (0.49) (2.24) 1.8 SD TENNESSEE 166.6 54.5 112.1 98.5 13.6 (0.20) 0.06 (0.19) (0.32) 13.9 TN TEXAS 514.9 355.8 159.0 122.2 36.8 (0.71) (0.56) 0.53 (0.74) 37.6 TX UTAH 54.9 17.8 37.2 26.2 11.0 2.77 2.00 1.39 6.16 4.8 UT VERMONT 15.3 3.3 12.0 9.0 3.0 0.45 0.13 0.05 0.63 2.4 VT VIRGINIA 413.2 290.5 122.7 95.2 27.5 2.98 (0.35) 1.49 4.11 23.4 VA WASHINGTON 172.2 110.0 62.2 52.0 10.2 (2.74) (1.05) (0.05) (3.85) 14.0 WA WEST VIRGINIA 52.2 41.4 10.8 7.0 3.8 0.35 (0.00) 0.09 0.44 3.3 WV WISCONSIN 105.1 51.9 53.3 42.7 10.6 1.10 (0.05) 0.24 1.30 9.3 WI WYOMING (3.5) 2.8 (6.3) (4.8) (1.5) (1.56) (1.09) (0.39) (3.04) 1.6 WY PUERTO RICO 67.2 41.9 25.4 21.7 3.6 (3.97)
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/96socc.pdf
  • & EXPENSES 2,188 15,851 959 16,181 10,841 7,390 INTEREST EXPENSE 43 1,026 29 196 637 341 OTHER INCOME & ADJUSTMENTS 2/ 8 (50) 0 (162) 242 26 INCOME TAXES 143 1,614 40 753 741 741 NET INCOME 210 2,798 75 1,202 1,477 1,142 EARNINGS PER SHARE 1.27 2.89 0.86 1.73 3.38 2.67 DIVIDENDS PER SHARE 0.86 1.88 0 0.05 2.36 1.49 AVG. SHARES OUTSTANDING (MIL.) 164 969 87 695 437 428 TOTAL ASSETS 2,222 38,422 950 22,978 27,659 16,608 PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIP. (NET) 971 22,902 403 12,174 17,675 12,073 LONG-TERM DEBT 675 13,210 223 4,798 9,326 5,424 SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY 1,060 7,336 431 10,661 7,059 2,773 OPERATING DATA: CUSTOMER LINES (THOUS.) 951 3/ 20,025 - - 17,740 16,427 NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/97socc.pdf
  • $0.29 $0.20 $0.17 $0.20 11-22 0.29 0.26 0.20 0.26 0.29 0.26 0.20 0.26 23-55 0.36 0.48 0.29 0.48 0.36 0.48 0.29 0.48 56-124 0.46 0.56 0.34 0.56 0.46 0.56 0.34 0.56 125-292 0.51 0.79 0.40 0.79 0.51 0.79 0.40 0.79 293-430 0.51 1.04 0.40 1.04 0.51 1.04 0.40 1.04 431-925 0.51 1.41 0.40 1.41 0.51 1.41 0.40 1.41 926-3000 0.51 1.49 0.40 1.49 0.51 1.49 0.40 1.49 RES. = RESIDENTIAL USAGE BUS. = COMMERCIAL USAGE SERVICE CHARGE PER CALL* CLASS OF SERVICE AT&T LEC COMMERCIAL CARD CARD CREDIT CARD CUSTOMER DIALED CALLING CARD STATION: CUSTOMER DIALED/AUTOMATED $2.00 $2.50 $3.50 CUSTOMER DIALED AND OPERATOR ASSISTED 2.50 3.00 4.00 CUSTOMER DIALED AND OPERATOR MUST ASSIST 2.50 3.00 4.00 OPERATOR STATION:** U.S. MAINLAND MEXICO
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/98SOCC.PDF
  • 3.56 1.21 2.31 0.74 1.42 1.59 3.04 1.03 1.98 0.64 1.22 1979 2.06 3.96 1.34 2.57 0.82 1.58 1.86 3.56 1.21 2.31 0.74 1.42 1.59 3.04 1.03 1.98 0.64 1.22 1980 15/ 2.17 4.17 1.41 2.71 0.87 1.67 1.97 3.77 1.28 2.45 0.79 1.51 1.65 3.15 1.07 2.05 0.66 1.26 1981 16/ 2.50 4.80 1.63 3.12 1.00 1.92 2.29 4.39 1.49 2.85 0.92 1.76 1.92 3.67 1.25 2.39 0.77 1.47 1982 17/ 2.70 5.15 1.62 3.09 1.08 2.06 2.34 4.49 1.40 2.69 0.94 1.80 2.05 3.90 1.23 2.34 0.82 1.56 1983 2.70 5.15 1.62 3.09 1.08 2.06 2.34 4.49 1.40 2.69 0.94 1.80 2.05 3.90 1.23 2.34 0.82 1.56 1984 18/ 2.53 4.83 1.52 2.90 1.01 1.93 2.18 4.18 1.31 2.51
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/99socc.pdf
  • 2.40 0.80 1.61 0.63 1.26 1.11 2.21 0.74 1.48 0.60 1.20 MCI 1.22 2.45 0.77 1.55 0.62 1.25 1.17 2.35 0.77 1.55 0.61 1.22 1.07 2.15 0.72 1.45 0.57 1.15 Sprint 1.22 2.45 0.77 1.55 0.62 1.25 1.17 2.35 0.77 1.55 0.61 1.22 1.10 2.20 0.72 1.45 0.57 1.15 1990 AT&T 1.25 2.49 0.75 1.50 0.68 1.36 1.20 2.39 0.75 1.49 0.65 1.31 1.08 2.15 0.73 1.45 0.60 1.21 MCI 1.20 2.40 0.70 1.40 0.62 1.25 1.15 2.30 0.70 1.40 0.61 1.22 1.05 2.10 0.69 1.38 0.57 1.15 Sprint 1.20 2.40 0.70 1.40 0.65 1.30 1.15 2.30 0.70 1.40 0.62 1.25 1.05 2.10 0.70 1.40 0.60 1.20 1991 AT&T 1.23 2.46 0.75 1.50 0.68 1.36 1.15 2.30 0.75 1.50 0.65 1.31
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/prelim02socc.pdf
  • Data Incorporated Int'l Inc. Inc. 5/ Inc. Revenues $992 $15,385 $43,138 $26,634 $67,625 Costs and Expenses 2,905 34,282 34,515 24,534 52,628 Interest Expense 64 1,789 1,382 1,406 3,237 Other Income and Adjustments 2/ 2,551 (20,282) 1,426 (103) (6,063) Income Taxes 0 (2,500) 2,984 (39) 1,618 Net Income (Loss) 574 (38,468) 5,653 630 4,079 Earnings per Share n.m. (22.87) 1.70 1.36 1.49 Dividends per Share n.m. 0 1.08 0.50 1.54 Average Shares Outstanding (millions) n.m. 1,682 3,330 892 2,745 Property, Plant and Equipment - Net 1,203 18,995 48,490 28,745 74,496 Total Assets 2,000 29,345 95,057 45,293 167,468 Long-Term Debt 705 19,754 18,536 18,405 44,791 Shareholders' Equity 776 (2,830) 33,199 12,294 32,616 Operating Data Customer Lines (thousands) - 4/ 16,500 4/ 57,083 8,100
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fcc97303.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fcc97303.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fcc97303.wp
  • Relief 149. We seek comment on the following proposed procedures for reviewing requests for relief filed under Section 332(c)(7)(B)(v) of the Communications Act. We propose that parties seeking relief file a request for declaratory ruling pursuant to Section 1.2 of the Commission's Rules, asking that the Commission review the state or local regulation and grant appropriate relief.207 Sections 1.45 through 1.49 of the Commission's Rules, concerning the filing of pleadings and responsive pleadings, shall be applicable with respect to such 207See 47 C.F.R. � 1.2. 63 Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-303 requests.208 We propose that a copy of the request be served on the state or local authority that took the action or failed to take the action against which relief
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Notices/2000/fcc00186.pdf
  • to ecfs@fcc.gov, and should include the following words in the body of the message, "get form ." A sample form and directions will be sent in reply. 34. Other requirements: Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with Section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules.47 We also direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. Comments and reply comments also must clearly identify the specific portion of this Notice to which a particular comment or set of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Notices/2000/fcc00367.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Notices/2000/fcc00367.txt
  • Copies also can be obtained from International Transcription Services, Inc. at 1231 20th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20036, or by calling ITS at (202) 857-3800 or by faxing ITS at (202) 857-3805. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with Section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments length of their submission. We also strongly encourage that parties track the organization set forth in this Notice in order to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Notices/2000/fcc00355.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Notices/2000/fcc00355.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Notices/2000/fcc00355.txt
  • one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. We also direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, regardless of the length of their submission. We also strongly encourage that
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Notices/1997/fcc97113.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Notices/1997/fcc97113.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Notices/1997/fcc97113.wp
  • filing initiative, but in our ongoing efforts to prepare the FCC for the information age. FCC 97-113 Federal Communications Commission 11 See, e.g., Jared Sandberg, "U.S. Households with Internet Access Doubled to 14.7 Million in Past Year," Wall Street Journal, October 21, 1996, at B11. 12 See footnote 2, supra, and & 10, infra. 13 See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. '' 1.49, 1.419. 14 47 C.F.R. ' 1.419(b). 15 If the Commission decides to do so, other rules may need to be modified, including Rule 1.52, 47 C.F.R. ' 1.52. See also & 20, infra. III. DISCUSSION A. Formal Status of Electronically Filed Comments 8. An estimated 40 million people in the United States now have access to the global Internet, and
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1998/fcc98056.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1998/fcc98056.wp
  • or other documents not required to be accompanies by a fee and which are hand-delivered must be tendered for filing in complete form before 5:30 p.m. in the Office of the Secretary, wither in Washington or Gettysburg, as directed by the Rules. The Secretary will determine whether a tendered document meets the pre-5:30 deadline. Documents filed electronically pursuant to � 1.49(f) of the Rules must be received by the Commission's electronic comment filing system before midnight. (h) If a document is required to be served upon other parties by statute or Commission regulation and the document is in fact served by mail (see � 1.47(f)), and the filing period for a response is 10 days or less, an additional 3 days
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp35.pdf
  • These regressions were run to determine whether sellers varied in their ability to operate profitably in the various concentration treatments.70 Observations = 24 F(3, 20) = 2.38 Prob > F = 0.1000 R2 = .2631 Root MSE = 50.43 Seller #1 Net Surplus Coefficient (t-value) (95% Confidence. Interval) Low/High -27.37 (1.09) -79.97 25.22 High/High -55.87 (-2.22) -108.47 -3.27 Period -13.75 (-1.49) -32.95 5.45 Constant 49.5 (.79) -80.77 179.77 Table 18: Seller #1 Net Surplus Regression (CAP MFN Treatment) 70 In the regressions that employ Seller #3 Net Surplus and Seller #4 Net Surplus as dependent variables, a Shapiro-Wilkes test rejects the null hypothesis that the respective regression error terms are normally distributed. 46 Observations = 24 F(3, 20) = 1.90 Prob
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.wp
  • the public interest because such requirements are unnecessary under ULS. In the past, multiple copies and microfiche were required to make application and licensing information available to the public. ULS, however, provides an unprecedented degree of accessibility to this information. Whether applications Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-25 See proposed 47 C.F.R. � 1.913 at Appendix C. 39 47 C.F.R. � 1.49(a). 40 See Electronic Filing NPRM, supra. 41 See proposed rules 47 C.F.R. �� 1.45, 1.49, 1.106. 42 See proposed rule 47 C.F.R. � 1.925(b). 43 See Electronic Filing NPRM, supra. 44 We seek comment on whether parties submitting manually-filed pleadings would be required to include a 45 diskette copy. See Section III-A-3, infra. 11 or pleadings are filed electronically or
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99141.pdf
  • Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. Comments and reply comments will be available for public inspection during regular business hours in the FCC Reference Center, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. 94. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with section 1.49, 47 C.F.R. � 1.49, and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. We also direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, regardless of the length of their submission. D.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/2000/fcc00361.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/2000/fcc00361.txt
  • S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. Comments and reply comments will be available for public inspection during regular business hours in the FCC Reference Center, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with section 1.49, 47 C.F.R. � 1.49, and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. We also direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, regardless of the length of their submission. D.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da001415.doc
  • reconsideration submitted to the Bureau office is not properly filed). 47 C.F.R. � 1.51(c)(2) (designating number of copies to be filed). Id. at � 1.51(c)(2) (requiring that a party not represented by an attorney ``sign and verify the document and state his address''). Id. at � 1.106(i) (``[p]etitions for reconsideration . . . shall conform to the requirements of �� 1.49, 1.51, and 1.52'') (emphasis added). See, e.g., In re 929 MHz Paging Licenses, Motions for Reconsideration of Waiver Requests of Construction Period, Order on Reconsideration, 14 FCC Rcd 9738 (CWD 1999); In re 929 and 931 MHz Paging Licenses, Motions for Reconsideration of Waiver Requests of Construction Period, Order on Reconsideration, 14 FCC Rcd 18,723 (CWD 1999); In re 800
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da001416.doc
  • 1.115(d). Id. at � 1.51(a)(2) (designating number of copies to be filed for matters to be acted on by the Commission). Id. at � 1.52 (requiring that a party not represented by an attorney ``sign and verify the document and state his address''). Id. at �� 1.106(i) (``[p]etitions for reconsideration . . . shall conform to the requirements of �� 1.49, 1.51, and 1.52'') (emphasis added), 1.115(f) (``[a]pplications for review . . . shall conform to the requirements of �� 1.49, 1.51, and 1.52'') (emphasis added). We note that the Commission has addressed all of the various Goodman/Chan-related issues in several orders relating to the numerous previous requests for relief filed in the Goodman/Chan and related cases. See, e.g., Goodman/Chan Order,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00264.doc
  • John Powell, Project 25 Steering Committee, Safety Tech Industries, State of California, and State of Florida between November 12, 1998 and December 2, 1998, respectively, ARE GRANTED OR DEFERRED to the extent indicated herein and otherwise ARE DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i) and Sections 1.49 and 1.429 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.49 and 1.429, that Motorola's Motion for Leave to Extend Page Limit IS GRANTED and Maxon America, Inc. Reply Comment IS DENIED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), that the Consumer Information
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00366.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00366.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00366.txt
  • S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. Comments and reply comments will be available for public inspection during regular business hours in the FCC Reference Center, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Comments and reply comments must include a short and concise summary of the substantive arguments raised in the pleading. Comments and reply comments must also comply with Section 1.49, 47 C.F.R. � 1.49, and all other applicable sections of the Commission's Rules. We also direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, regardless of the length of their submission. .
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2001/da012482.pdf
  • the Applicants represent that after closing of the transaction, certain Class A shares of SES Global will be held as follows:5 Class A Shareholder Economic Interest (%)6Voting Interest (%)7Voting Power (%)8 Dresdner Bank Luxembourg S.A. 3.07 2.46 2.57 Deutsche Bank Luxembourg S.A. 2.68 2.14 2.24 Luxempart S.A. 2.27 1.81 1.90 TITA S.A. 2.03 1.62 1.70 Loran Telecommunications S.A. 1.78 1.42 1.49 Trufidee S.A. 1.70 1.36 1.42 Compagnie de Financement C.E.F. 1.70 1.36 1.42 Audiolux S.A. 1.34 1.07 1.12 Aachener & M�nchener BG AG 1.34 1.07 1.12 Banque G�n�rale du Luxembourg S.A. 1.05 0.84 0.88 Space Equipment S.A. 0.74 0.59 0.62 BGL Investment Partners S.A. 0.59 0.47 0.50 Other A Shareholders (57 unnamed individuals and companies) 0.35 0.28 0.29 Fiduciary Depositary Receipts
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
  • of Service > 12 Hours 64.45NA 73.67 NA 68.59 NA MR-4-08- 3345 % Out of Service > 24 Hours 24.86NA 25.39 NA 27.56 NA MR-5 � Repeat Trouble Reports MR-5-01- 3345 % Repeat Reports within 30 Days 55.52NA 57.53 NA 56.83 NA Special Services - Maintenance MR-2 � Trouble Report Rate MR-2-01- 3200 Network Trouble Report Rate 0.24 1.45 0.24 1.49 0.2 1.62 0.21 1.8 0.21 1.54 MR-2-05- 3200 % CPE/TOK/FOK Trouble Report Rate 0.29 1.94 0.31 2.66 0.27 2.63 2.57 2.94 MR-4 � Trouble Duration Intervals MR-4-01- 3200 Mean Time To Repair � Total 6.9 7.23 7.76 7.45 MR-4-01- 3216 Mean Time To Repair � Total - Non DS0 & DS0 6.52NA 5.77 NA 6.45 2.25 MR-4-01- 3217 Mean Time
• http://www.fcc.gov/DiversityFAC/041004/RichardDeanHodson.pdf
  • Page I. Introduction....................................................................................1 II. History and Development of Hodson Broadcasting......................3 III. Disappointment and Dismay in Commission=s Constant Apathetic Attitude Toward Commenting Parties..........................6 IV. Suggestions and Proposals to Assist New Entrants and Designated Entities.........................................................................8 V. Summary/Conclusion..................................................................17 I. Introduction 2 Hodson Broadcasting, a sole proprietorship, small business entity, formed by Richard Dean Hodson (hereafter called AHodson@), pursuant to Sections 1.415, 1.419, and 1.49 of the Commission=s Rules, respectfully submits the following AComments@ in response to the Public Notice1 that spawned this proceeding. 1See DA 04-1690, Media Bureau Seeks Comment on Ways to Further Section 257 Mandate and to Build on Earlier Studies, MB Docket No. 04-228 (MB June 15, 2004). The initial PN directed that interested parties may file comments within 30 days
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-182A1.html
  • R. Nordrehaug, counsel for Complainants, Blumenthal Ostroff & Markham, dated December 7, 2000 (stating, for example, that the complaint fails to comply with section 1.721(a)(12) which requires that each copy of the complaint filed with the Commission contain a Formal Complaint Intake Form and that the complaint does not include a summary or table of contents as required by section 1.49(b)-(c)). 11 See 47 C.F.R. 1.728(a). 12 Amended Formal Complaint at 1. 13 Id. 14 Id. 15 MCI WorldCom Answer at 17. 16 See American Message Centers v. FCC, 50 F.3d 35, 41 (D.C. Cir. 1995) (citing Amendment of Rules Governing Procedures to be Followed Where Formal Complaints are Filed Against Common Carriers, Report and Order, 3 FCC Rcd 1806, 1806,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-04-2092A1.html
  • Rcd at 14882-84, 410 -12 (Appendix D, 14 FCC Rcd at 15034-35, 66). See also Delegation of Additional Authority to the Enforcement Bureau, 17 FCC Rcd 4795 (2002) (delegating authority to the Enforcement Bureau to carry out merger-related audit and compliance tasks). 4 47 C.F.R. 1.1200(a), 1.1206. 5 47 C.F.R. 1.1206(b). 6 47 C.F.R. 1.415, 1.419. 7 See 47 C.F.R. 1.49. References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2092A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2092A1.doc 3. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2092A2.pdf 4. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2092A3.pdf
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-04-2093A1.html
  • FCC Rcd at 14190-93, 336-342 (Appendix D, 15 FCC Rcd at 14327-28, 56). See also Delegation of Additional Authority to the Enforcement Bureau, 17 FCC Rcd 4795 (2002) (delegating authority to the Enforcement Bureau to carry out merger-related audit and compliance tasks). 4 47 C.F.R. 1.1200(a), 1.1206. 5 47 C.F.R. 1.1206(b). 6 47 C.F.R. 1.415, 1.419. 7 See 47 C.F.R. 1.49. References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2093A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2093A1.doc 3. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2093A2.pdf 4. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2093A3.pdf
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-11-967A1.html
  • 1 Order"). Id. at P: P: 10, 15. Id. at P: 10. Id. at P: 15. 47 C.F.R. S:S: 1.720-1.736. 47 C.F.R. S:S: 1.1401-1.1418. Note that these new rules do not affect existing section 208 formal complaints or existing section 224 pole attachment complaints. They also do not concern carrier-to-carrier informal complaints. See Id. at Appendix A, (listing new rule S:1.49(f)(1)(i) that requires "[f]ormal complaint proceedings under Section 208 . . . " to be filed electronically and excluding informal complaints from that rule). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 References 1. http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-967A1.pdf 2. http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-967A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1838A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1838A1.pdf
  • March 7, 2005. Broadcast Actions, Public Notice, Report No. 45935 (Mar. 7, 2005). Petition at unnumbered page 2. 47 C.F.R. � 73.3527. WWIZ, Inc., 37 FCC at 686; see also National Association of Broadcasters, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 24414, 24415 (2003). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.106(c). The Hoosier Petition fails to comply with 47 C.F.R. � 1.49(a) (containing specifications for pleadings filed with the Commission), 47 C.F.R. � 1.49(c) (requiring that pleadings exceeding ten pages include as part of the pleading, ``a succinct, but accurate and clear condensation of the substance of the filing''), and 47 C.F.R. �� 1.106(d)(1) and (2) (requiring petitions for reconsideration to ``state with particularity the respects in which petitioner believes the action
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1938A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1938A1.pdf
  • (1964), aff'd sub. nom Lorain Journal Co. v. FCC, 351 F.2d 824 (D.C. Cir. 1965), cert. denied 383 U.S. 967 (1966)(``WWIZ, Inc.''); see also National Association of Broadcasters, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 24414, 24415 (2003). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.106(c). Among the procedural rules with which the Hoosier Petition fails to comply are 47 C.F.R. � 1.49(a) (specifying pleading format requirements) and 47 C.F.R. � 1.49(c) (requiring succinct summaries of pleadings that exceed ten pages). WWIZ, Inc., 37 FCC at 686; See also William L. Carroll, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 8 FCC Rcd 6279 (1993). 47 C.F.R. � 73.561(b). Staff Decision at 2. 47 C.F.R. � 1.106(b) and (c). See Fatima Response, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order,
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1939A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1939A1.pdf
  • was released on March 7, 2005, Public Notice, Broadcast Actions, Report No. 45935 (March 7, 2005). WWIZ, Inc., 37 FCC at 686; see also National Association of Broadcasters, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 24414, 24415 (2003). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.106(c). Among the procedural rules with which the Hoosier Petition fails to comply are 47 C.F.R. � 1.49(a), (specifying pleading format requirements) and 47 C.F.R. � 1.49(c) (requiring succinct summaries for pleadings that exceed ten pages). WWIZ, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 37 FCC 685, 686 (1964), aff'd sub. nom Lorain Journal Co. v. FCC, 351 F.2d 824 (D.C. Cir. 1965), cert. denied 383 U.S. 967 (1966)(``WWIZ, Inc.''). See also William L. Carroll, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 8
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-2A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-2A1.pdf
  • 2009 3.84 3.67 2.93 * (805) (810) (1295) Contour Measure 2005 3.65 4.71 * 5.91 * (1250) (827) (990) 2007 3.37 4.42 * 5.62 * (1018) (793) (1206) 2009 2.48 3.29 * 4.14 * (925) (766) (1219) Foreign Language Format Market Measure 2005 2.45 2.07 1.85 * (89) (50) (75) 2007 2.87 2.28 2.17 * (69) (57) (104) 2009 2.23 1.49 * 1.53 * (76) (54) (116) Contour Measure 2005 2.04 2.17 2.40 (108) (64) (42) 2007 2.31 2.46 2.51 (98) (73) (59) 2009 1.70 1.76 1.77 (103) (68) (75) Religion Format Market Measure 2005 2.14 1.65 1.30 * (55) (41) (52) 2007 1.53 1.85 1.33 (39) (32) (62) 2009 1.18 1.59 0.88 (34) (36) (57) Contour Measure 2005 1.70 1.55
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-06-163A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-06-163A1.pdf
  • Marlene H. Dortch Secretary APPENDIX A Rule Changes Part 1 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended to read as follows: 1. Section 1.401 is amended by revising paragraphs (b) and (d) to read as follows: � 1.401 Petitions for rule making. ***** (b) The petition for rule making shall conform to the requirements of �� 1.49, 1.52, and 1.419(b) (or � 1.420(e), if applicable), and shall be submitted or addressed to the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 20554, or may be submitted electronically. ***** (d) . . . Petitions to amend the FM Table of Allotments must be accompanied by the appropriate construction permit application and payment of the appropriate application filing fee. 2. Section
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-12-43A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-12-43A1.pdf
  • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/pd/pf/circuit.pdf
  • 53% -6% 13 8 10 1Netherlands 1,179 2,028 66 3,273 3,006 0.58 0.56 1.84 10% 7% 8% 78% 14 13 8 4Dominican Republic 2,156 695 0 2,851 833 3.10 2.15 2.57 30% -10% 17% 325% 15 26 22 1Spain 1,722 1,041 46 2,809 1,705 1.65 6.01 14.74 42% 418% 93% -17% 16 16 16 6Venezuela 1,611 1,080 2 2,693 1,567 1.49 2.14 4.14 15% 66% 31% -8% 17 17 21 7Taiwan 1,635 996 2 2,633 907 1.64 2.32 6.82 19% 68% 33% -24% 18 12 12 1Italy 1,700 813 44 2,557 1,356 2.09 2.34 9.36 -4% 8% -1% 10% 19 21 17 1Switzerland 1,237 1,111 1 2,349 1,923 1.11 1.33 2.29 30% 55% 41% 27% 20 20 27 7Singapore 641 1,617
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/pd/pf/csreport.pdf
  • 6,414 582 0.22 0.82 1.28 1.77 7 15 19 20 20Singapore 867 4,748 152 5,767 2,604 0.18 0.43 0.40 0.56 6 16 29 n.a. n.a.Chile 1,081 4,585 38 5,704 1,308 0.23 0.82 1.09 1.96 7 17 13 12 14Philippines 3,143 1,847 2 4,992 2,574 1.70 2.17 3.43 5.05 6 18 16 16 16Venezuela 1,913 2,412 0 4,325 1,700 0.79 1.31 1.49 2.14 1 19 n.a. n.a. n.a.Denmark 1,267 234 2,520 4,021 542 0.46 2.89 5.82 7.00 6 20 23 29 29Argentina 779 3,150 30 3,959 1,128 0.24 0.46 0.76 1.34 6 21 28 27 23Colombia 1,391 2,273 24 3,688 1,313 0.61 1.26 1.54 3.11 7 22 15 17 17Taiwan 1,647 1,837 48 3,532 4,580 0.87 0.71 1.64 2.32 7 23 n.a.
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/pd/pf/csreport_2000.pdf
  • 0.76 7 22 17 13 12Philippines 3,862 3,647 2 7,511 1,567 1.06 1.59 2.17 3.42 6 23 21 28 27Colombia 1,699 5,452 142 7,293 7,526 0.30 0.58 1.26 1.52 8 24 n.a . n.a . n.a .New Zealand 827 6,225 31 7,083 124 0.13 0.90 2.16 1.83 6 25 18 16 16Venezuela 1,890 4,896 180 6,966 1,065 0.37 0.70 1.31 1.49 7 26 29 21 24Malaysia 613 5,942 0 6,555 128 0.10 0.25 0.37 0.37 1 27 19 n.a . n.a .Denmark 1,258 763 4,410 6,431 657 0.24 0.46 2.87 3.96 9 28 25 26 28Russia 1,455 3,044 0 4,499 696 0.48 1.01 1.45 2.28 1 29 30 18 15Spain 2,726 1,256 2 3,984 3,765 2.17 1.28 1.72 1.58 1 30
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/engineering/coals_order03-55.pdf
  • amendments or modifications that individually would be considered minor changes, but that, cumulatively, might constitute a major change. We received no comments on this issue and, upon further consideration, we do not anticipate that cumulative minor amendments or changes will be a significant issue. Therefore, cumulative minor amendments or changes will not become major amendments or changes. 24. Currently, Section 1.49 of our rules allows pleadings and documents filed in most Commission proceedings to be filed electronically.32 Once COALS is implemented, we intend to enhance COALS to allow pleadings and informal requests for Commission actions associated with CARS applications or licenses to be filed electronically. Such pleadings include petitions to deny, petitions for reconsideration, applications for review, comments, motions for extension
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/peer_review/prlpfm_rpt_economic_study.pdf
  • 2009 3.84 3.67 2.93 * (805) (810) (1295) Contour Measure 2005 3.65 4.71 * 5.91 * (1250) (827) (990) 2007 3.37 4.42 * 5.62 * (1018) (793) (1206) 2009 2.48 3.29 * 4.14 * (925) (766) (1219) Foreign Language Format Market Measure 2005 2.45 2.07 1.85 * (89) (50) (75) 2007 2.87 2.28 2.17 * (69) (57) (104) 2009 2.23 1.49 * 1.53 * (76) (54) (116) Contour Measure 2005 2.04 2.17 2.40 (108) (64) (42) 2007 2.31 2.46 2.51 (98) (73) (59) 2009 1.70 1.76 1.77 (103) (68) (75) Religion Format Market Measure 2005 2.14 1.65 1.30 * (55) (41) (52) 2007 1.53 1.85 1.33 (39) (32) (62) 2009 1.18 1.59 0.88 (34) (36) (57) Contour Measure 2005 1.70 1.55
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/materials/already-released/consumer090002.pdf
  • Chg. HUT Viewing '95- '00 Chg. Daily Paper Circ. per cap '93- '99 Chg. Weekly Paper Circ. per cap '93- '99 Chg. AQH List '94-'98 Chg. AQH News List '93-'97 Chg. Cable Use '94-'00 Int Use '00 Int News Use '00 Chg. TV Stns. '94-'00 0.6104 -0.0157 0.1023 0.0779 -0.0259 -0.3002 -0.7365 -0.6838 (1.84) (0.07) (0.14) (1.33) (0.78) (1.06) (0.91) (1.49) Chg. Inside Radio Stns '93-'97 -0.0898 -0.1078 -0.1958 0.0091 -0.1842 -0.1856 (1.01) (1.67) (1.02) (0.56) (2.43)* (0.85) Chg. Daily Papers '93-'99 -0.2157 1.4125 -0.1983 -0.0929 0.0028 -0.2911 1.3533 0.8029 (0.63) (5.72)** (0.27) (1.56) (0.08) (1.00) (1.62) (1.70) Chg. Weekly Papers '93-'99 0.0075 0.0203 0.0444 -0.0033 0.0024 0.0180 0.0504 0.0198 (0.39) (1.48) (1.09) (1.01) (1.24) (1.11) (1.08) (0.75) Chg. Inside News
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/rcn_exparte070302.pdf
  • beyond the minimum protections mandated by the antitrust laws, the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and the FCC�s rules, and that such safeguards are warranted in view of AT&T Broadband�s and Comcast�s history of anti-competitive behavior and the magnitude of their proposed merger. Secretary, Federal Communications Commission July 3, 2002 Page 3 of 3 Pursuant to sections 1.1206(b)(2) and 1.49(f) of the Commissions rules, this ex parte notice is being electronically filed for inclusion in the public record for the above- referenced docket. Please direct any questions concerning this filing to the undersigned. Respectfully submitted, s/ L. Elise Dieterich Counsel for RCN Telecom Services, Inc. cc (by e-mail):Royce Sherlock Roger Holberg Erin Dozier David Sappington James Bird Donald Stockdale William
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/cpd/forbearance/forbearance-rules.pdf
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Forbearance Procedural Rules 47 C.F.R. � 1.49 Specifications as to pleadings and documents. * * * * * (f)(1) * * * (iv) Petition for forbearance proceedings. 47 C.F.R. � 1.53 Separate pleadings for petitions for forbearance. In order to be considered as a petition for forbearance subject to the one-year deadline set forth in 47 U.S.C. 160(c), any petition requesting that the Commission exercise its forbearance