FCC Web Documents citing 1.52

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1405A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1405A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1405A1.txt
  • Reconsideration Letters relate to the Goodman/Chan matter. 2. None of the Reconsideration Letters complies with our procedural requirements for the filing of petitions for reconsideration. In particular, none of the Reconsideration Letters was filed with the Secretary of the Commission, as required by section 1.106(i) of the Commission's rules. Additionally, none of the Reconsideration Letters complies with sections 1.51(c)(2) and 1.52, thereby further failing to satisfy the requirements of section 1.106(i). 3. Moreover, the Commission has considered all of the various Goodman/Chan-related issues in several orders addressing numerous previous requests for relief filed in Goodman/Chan and related cases. All of the issues raised in the Reconsideration Letters have been resolved by these orders, and petitioners present no new arguments or facts
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1415A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1415A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1415A1.txt
  • Reconsideration Letters relate to the Goodman/Chan matter. 2. None of the Reconsideration Letters complies with our procedural requirements for the filing of petitions for reconsideration. In particular, none of the Reconsideration Letters was filed with the Secretary of the Commission, as required by section 1.106(i) of the Commission's rules. Additionally, none of the Reconsideration Letters complies with sections 1.51(c)(2) and 1.52, thereby further failing to satisfy the requirements of section 1.106(i). 3. Moreover, the Commission has considered all of the various Goodman/Chan-related issues in several orders addressing numerous previous requests for relief filed in Goodman/Chan and related cases. All of the issues raised in the Reconsideration Letters have been resolved by these orders, and petitioners present no new arguments or facts
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1415A1_Erratum.doc
  • Reconsideration Letters relate to the Goodman/Chan matter. 2. None of the Reconsideration Letters complies with our procedural requirements for the filing of petitions for reconsideration. In particular, none of the Reconsideration Letters was filed with the Secretary of the Commission, as required by section 1.106(i) of the Commission's rules. Additionally, none of the Reconsideration Letters complies with sections 1.51(c)(2) and 1.52, thereby further failing to satisfy the requirements of section 1.106(i). 3. Moreover, the Commission has considered all of the various Goodman/Chan-related issues in several orders addressing numerous previous requests for relief filed in Goodman/Chan and related cases. All of the issues raised in the Reconsideration Letters have been resolved by these orders, and petitioners present no new arguments or facts
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1416A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1416A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1416A1.txt
  • and 1.115(f) of the Commission's rules. Additionally, most of the AFR Letters appear not to comply with the requirements in sections 1.106(f) and 1.115(d), respectively, that petitions for reconsideration and applications for review be filed within 30 days of public notice of the action for which review is sought. Moreover, none of the AFR Letters complies with sections 1.51(a)(2) and 1.52, thereby further failing to satisfy the respective requirements of sections 1.106(h) and 1.115(f). Accordingly, we dismiss all of the AFR Letters for failure to comply with the Commission's procedural rules. Section 1.106(b)(3) of the Commission's rules provides an additional basis for dismissing the AFR Letters listed in Appendix B. The Commission dismissed or denied previous applications for review filed by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1416A1_Erratum.doc
  • and 1.115(f) of the Commission's rules. Additionally, most of the AFR Letters appear not to comply with the requirements in sections 1.106(f) and 1.115(d), respectively, that petitions for reconsideration and applications for review be filed within 30 days of public notice of the action for which review is sought. Moreover, none of the AFR Letters complies with sections 1.51(a)(2) and 1.52, thereby further failing to satisfy the respective requirements of sections 1.106(h) and 1.115(f). Accordingly, we dismiss all of the AFR Letters for failure to comply with the Commission's procedural rules. Section 1.106(b)(3) of the Commission's rules provides an additional basis for dismissing the AFR Letters listed in Appendix B. The Commission dismissed or denied previous applications for review filed by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1418A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1418A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1418A1.txt
  • examination by interested parties during regular business hours in the Commission's Reference Center (Room CY-A257) at its headquarters, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. Although petitioner's request indicates that the original copy of its proposal was signed, petitioner failed to include an affidavit verifying that the statements contained in its petition were accurate to the best of its knowledge. Section 1.52 of the Commission's rules requires that the original of any document filed with the Commission by a party not represented by counsel be signed and verified by the party and his/her address stated. Section 1.401(b) of the Commission rules concerning rulemaking proceeding places petitioners on notice that their proposals must conform with the requirements of Section 1.52 regarding subscription and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1632A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1632A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1632A1.txt
  • Sprint PCS, Chicago BTA, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 9489 (1999) (``Orland Park Order''). During the pendency of this case, environmental compliance functions within the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau were transferred from the Enforcement Division to the Commercial Wireless Division. Orland Park Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 9495, � 9. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.106. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.52 See Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Revises and Begins Phased Implementation of Its Unified Policy for Reviewing License Applications and Pleadings, Public Notice, 14 FCC Rcd 11,182, 11,187-88 (Wireless Tel. Bur. 1999). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.106. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.47(b). We note also that petitioner failed to file four copies of its pleading (47 C.F.R. � 1.51), and that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2425A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2425A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2425A1.txt
  • an allotment at Mount Pleasant are unacceptable. Broadcast Services did not file a certificate of service with its comments indicating that a copy was served on Ashcraft in compliance with Section 1.420(a) of the Commission's Rules. See Wilson Creek, Washington and Pendleton, Oregon, 11 FCC Rcd 11842 (1996). Further, Broadcast Services neglected to provide an address in compliance with Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules, subscription and verification. Therefore, in view of the above discussion, no further consideration will be given to the allotment of an FM channel at Mount Pleasant, Texas. 4. In response to the counterproposal filed by BBC, we shall allot Channel 263A at Bogata, Texas. Channel 263A can be allotted to Bogata in compliance with the Commission's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2590A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2590A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2590A1.txt
  • 418-2180. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION John A. Karousos Chief, Allocations Branch Policy and Rules Division Mass Media Bureau In accordance with the request in the Notice, petitioner has clarified that Aaron Bruton and Jeffrey A. Bruton are the same person and thus the affidavit verifying the statements contained in the petition was indeed signed by the petitioner, as required by Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules. The coordinates for Channel 221C3 at Pilot Rock are 45-30-00 NL; 119-00-56 WL. � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �`� �0� �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1150A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1150A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1150A1.txt
  • application filing process should be addressed to the Audio Services Division, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 418-2700. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION John A. Karousos Chief, Allocations Branch Policy and Rules Division Mass Media Bureau As stated in the Notice, petitioner's request, although signed and an address provided, failed to include an affidavit verifying statements contained in her petition, as required by Section 1.52 of the Commission's rules. Petitioner was requested to correct the deficiency in her responsive comments and has complied accordingly. The site restriction is required to negate a short spacing to both the licensed site and pending construction permit site (BPH-19991202ABZ) of Station WOKA-FM, Channel 294C1, Douglas, Georgia. Federal Communications Commission DA 01-1150 Federal Communications Commission DA 01-1150 - - �0�
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1321A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1321A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1321A1.txt
  • FURTHER ORDERED, That this proceeding IS TERMINATED. 6. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact Pam Blumenthal, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 418-1600. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Barbara A. Kreisman Chief, Video Services Division Mass Media Bureau As stated in the Notice, petitioner's request, although signed, failed to include an affidavit verifying the statements contained in its petition, as required by Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules. Petitioner was requested to correct this deficiency in its responsive comments and has complied accordingly by filing a properly executed affidavit. � � � � � � � � �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �`� �0� i i i i K M N O a c g j K M N O a c
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1393A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1393A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1393A1.txt
  • Darien is governed by an elected mayor and a four-person city council. It has its own zip code (31305), post office, and newspaper (The Darien News), two public and three private schools, police and fire departments, two banks, 29 churches, two medical clinics, and twelve civic and social clubs. Its primary areas of employment are tourism and commercial fishing. Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules requires that all pleadings filed by parties not represented by legal counsel be signed and verified by the petitioner and provide the petitioner's mailing address. In this case, petitioner signed the petition and provided his address. However, he did not submit a statement attesting that the information included in the petition is correct and true to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1482A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1482A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1482A1.txt
  • original and four copies of all comments, reply comments, pleadings, briefs, or other documents shall be furnished the Commission. 6. Public Inspection of Filings. All filings made in this proceeding will be available for examination by interested parties during regular business hours in the Commission's Reference Information Center (Room CY-A257) at its headquarters, 445 Twelfth Street, SW, Washington, D.C. Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules requires that all pleadings filed by parties not represented by legal counsel be signed and verified by the petitioner and provide the petitioner's mailing address. In all three cases included in this Notice of Proposed rule Making, the petitioner signed the petition and provided his address. However, he did not submit a statement attesting that the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1484A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1484A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1484A1.txt
  • in this proceeding will be available for examination by interested parties during regular business hours in the Commission's Public Reference Room at its headquarters, 445 Twelfth Street, SW, Washington, D. C 20554. In the Report and Order in MM Docket No. 99-357, 15 FCC Rcd 9179 (2000), the Commission substituted Channel 281C2 for vacant Channel 249C2 at Mason, Texas. Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules requires that all pleadings filed by parties not represented by legal counsel be signed and verified by the petitioner and provide the petitioner's mailing address. In this case, Crawford and Pyeatt have signed their respective petitions and provided mailing addresses. However, neither Crawford or Pyeatt submitted a statement attesting that the information included in their respective
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1601A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1601A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1601A1.txt
  • IS FURTHER ORDERED That this proceeding IS TERMINATED. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact Victoria M. McCauley, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 418-2180. Questions related to the application filing process should be addressed to the Audio Services Division, Mass Media Bureau (202) 418-2700. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION John A. Karousos Chief, Allocations Branch Policy and Rules Division Mass Media Bureau Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules requires that all pleadings filed by parties not represented by legal counsel be signed and verified by the petitioner and provide the petitioner's mailing address. Petitioner rectified this ommission in its comments. The coordinates for Channel 280A at Bordelonville are 31-06-19 North Latitude and 91-54-26 West Longitude. As we noted in the Notice, we recognize that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1619A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1619A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1619A1.txt
  • contents of financial statements. There is no rule that requires applicants to have a certified public accountant prepare cost information for submission in a Commission proceeding, nor does the Commission require applicants to submit affidavits or to swear to the truth of information they submit. The document in question was signed by AT&T's attorney and therefore is subject to Section 1.52 of the Commission's rules. Furthermore, Hoxeng has not provided us with any reason to question the accuracy of any of the cost information that AT&T submitted or the truthfulness of any statements AT&T has made in this proceeding. We agree with Hoxeng that the figures cited in the Discontinuance Order understate the revenue AT&T derived from High Seas Service, but
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1669A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1669A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1669A1.txt
  • The proposed allotment will require concurrence by Mexico because Encinal is located within 320 kilometers (199 miles) of the Mexican border. Encinal is a city in La Salle County and has a population of 620 persons. La Salle County is located in the southern part of the State of Texas and has a population of 5,254 persons. In compliance with �1.52 of the Commission's rules, petitioner is requested to include with his comments verification that the statements contained in the petition are accurate to the best of his knowledge. FCC Contact: Deborah A. Dupont (202) 418-7072 MM Docket No. 01-153; RM-10169 Petitioner: Charles Crawford 4553 Bordeaux Avenue Dallas, Texas 75205 Proposal: Allot Channel 245C3 at Tilden, Texas as the community's first
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1760A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1760A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1760A1.txt
  • William H. Johnson Deputy Chief Cable Services Bureau See In the Matter of Century Cable TV, 10 FCC Rcd 1710 (1995). See Letter dated February 2, 1995 from Mr. Ken Simmons, Assistant City Manager, City of Redondo Beach to the Federal Communications Commission. Although this letter format does not conform to the requirements of 47 C.F.R. �� 1.49, 1.51 and 1.52, we will address the merits of the LFA's letter as a petition for reconsideration. Communications Act, Section 623(c), as amended, 47 U.S.C. �543(c) (1996). Pub. L. No. 102-385, 106 Stat. 1460 (1992). See Section 76.956 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �76.956. Id. See Section 76.957 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 76.957. Implementation of Sections of the Cable
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1862A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1862A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1862A1.txt
  • coordinates of 30-24-50 NL and 86-37-40 WL). The proposed allotment requires a site restriction of 2.1 km (1.3 miles) southeast of Port St. Joe at the coordinates indicated above. Port St. Joe is an incorporated community that serves as the county seat of Gulf County. Petitioner states that Port St. Joe has a population of 4,044 persons. In compliance with �1.52 of the Commission's rules, petitioner is requested to include with his comments verification that the statements contained in the petition are accurate to the best of his knowledge. FCC Contact: Deborah A. Dupont (202) 418-7072 B. MM Docket No. 01-180; RM-10200 Petitioner: Katherine Pyeatt 6655 Airtree Circle Dallas, Texas 75214 Proposal: Allot Channel 265A at Holdenville, Oklahoma as the community's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-186A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-186A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-186A1.txt
  • be available for examination by interested parties during regular business hours in the Commission's Reference Information Center (Room CY-A257), at its headquarters, 445 Twelfth Street, SW., Washington, D.C. Although petitioner's request was signed and an address provided, he did not include an affidavit verifying that the statements contained in the petition are accurate to the best of his knowledge. Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules requires that the original of any document filed with the Commission by a party not represented by counsel must be signed and verified by the party and his/her address stated. In the absence of such verification, the petition may be dismissed. Section 1.401(b) of the Commission's Rules concerning rule making proceedings places petitioners on notice that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2117A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2117A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2117A1.txt
  • periods using non-cable household diaries for the zip codes included in New Haven that have been gathered for their routine audience sweep measurements. The submitted audience information is as follows: Survey Households Share Standard Net Standard Year Studied Viewing Error Weekly Error Hours Circulation 1997/1998 WABC-TV 20 0 0 0 0 WWOR-TV 20 0.77 0.72 3.88 3.95 1998/1999 WABC-TV 22 1.52 1.21 9.37 5.12 WWOR-TV 22 0.10 0.10 7.17 7.46 WTNH argues that the Bureau found this type of submission acceptable in its recent decision in Benedek License Corporation. WTNH asserts that this study establishes that, for two consecutive years, WABC-TV and WWOR-TV have not met the applicable viewing levels required for a distant station to be considered significantly viewed in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2250A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2250A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2250A1.txt
  • original and four copies of all comments, reply comments, pleadings, briefs, or other documents shall be furnished the Commission. 6. Public Inspection of Filings. All filings made in this proceeding will be available for examination by interested parties during regular business hours in the Commission's Reference Information Center at its headquarters, 445 Twelfth Street, SW, Washington, D. C 20554. Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules requires that the original of any document filed with the Commission by a party not represented by counsel, be signed and verified by the commenting or petitioning party and his/her address stated. In the absence of such verification, the petition may be dismissed. Section 1.401(b) of the Commission's Rules concerning rule making proceedings places petitioners on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-254A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-254A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-254A1.txt
  • Regulations, an original and four copies of all comments, reply comments, pleadings, briefs, or other documents shall be furnished the Commission. 6. Public Inspection of Filings. All filings made in this proceeding will be available for examination by interested parties during regular business hours in the Commission's Reference Information Center, at its headquarters, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules requires that all pleadings filed by parties not represented by legal counsel be signed and verified by the petitioner and provide the petitioner's mailing address. In this case, petitioner signed the petition and provided her address. However, she did not submit a statement attesting that the information included in the petition is correct and true to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-255A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-255A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-255A1.txt
  • 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, That this proceeding IS TERMINATED. 6. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact Leslie K. Shapiro, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 418-2180. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION John A. Karousos Chief, Allocations Branch Policy and Rules Division Mass Media Bureau The Notice requested clarification as to whether the verification statement included in the petition, as required by Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules, was signed by the petitioner or its technical consultant. In response, petitioner states that since he is now represented by counsel, counsel verifies the pleadings submitted in the proceeding. IBC's comments, which were served on the petitioner, were not timely filed or accompanied by a request for their acceptance. However, because the comments contain information of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2581A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2581A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2581A1.txt
  • absence of precedent supporting the dismissal for failure to sign a pleading, and in light of the absence of any prejudice to Commco, we are not inclined to dismiss Mr. Beyerle's Petition on that basis. We remind petitioners that unsigned pleadings may be stricken ``and the matter may proceed as though the document had not been filed.'' 47 C.F.R. � 1.52. In the future, we reserve the discretion to strictly enforce the requirement of Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules that all pleadings be signed at the time of filing. Opposition at 3-5. See AT&T Wireless PCS, Inc., Order, 15 FCC Rcd 4587, 4588 � 3 (WTB CWD 2000) (AT&T Wireless) (citing Sierra Club v. Morton, 405 U.S. 727, 73 (1972);
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2836A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2836A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2836A1.txt
  • (rel. Oct. 10, 2001) (``Procedures PN''). Documents filed electronically as miscellaneous attachments to FCC Forms 175 remain subject to the restriction prohibiting the filing of major amendments to an FCC Form 175 after the initial short-form filing deadline, which, for Auction No. 43, was November 16, 2001. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105(b)(2); Procedures PN at 11. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.52. See Interim Electronic Filing Order, � 3. � � �$ �����PNG > �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� �� � �a�% Tf(c) U~��Uy�Ӛ�o=�c� {�YAD ���Zv�}�YAD e/�,�-�%E9 ^1�J 2�� bʆPh=f 8H�]}��`��2@ ���'����X�t�p�O � ��$��>��� -�m�``�Q(q P� ���e D �_�� p�/]b|?�O� V��Jõ tXT���e� 2)�V``� (c)}�l�tmE...bϡ gs�>o���(R)"q�Q ܆���D N ��- >��r�Kp��-~i�f�M�� z} ���� tm��(c)��cv `��� 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2909A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2909A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2909A1.txt
  • C3 or Class A channel) should be allotted to Paonia, petitioner hereby states his present intention to apply for such a channel if allotted, and if authorized, to build the facilities promptly. Discussion 5. As a threshold matter, we must address a procedural issue. Babudro contends that GGR's counterproposal should be dismissed for violation of the verification requirement of Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules. Although Babudro acknowledges that GGR's counterproposal was signed by one of its principals and contained a statement verifying that the statements contained in the instant document are true and correct to the best of that principal's knowledge and belief, Babudro appears to contend that this verification is defective because it was not in a separate, notarized
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-380A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-380A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-380A1.txt
  • FURTHER ORDERED, That this proceeding IS TERMINATED. 9. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact Pam Blumenthal, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 418-1600. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Barbara A. Kreisman Chief, Video Services Division Mass Media Bureau As stated in the Notice, petitioner's request, although signed, failed to include an affidavit verifying the statements contained in his petition, as required by Section 1.52 of the Commission Rules. Petitioner's was requested to correct this deficiency in his responsive comments and has complied accordingly by filing an affidavit. Petitioner is also now represented by counsel. ACME filed supporting comments noting that on July 17, 2000, ACME; Pappas Telecasting of America, and Television Capital Corporation of Lexington filed a "Supplement to Joint Request for Approval of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-399A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-399A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-399A1.txt
  • Regulations, an original and four copies of all comments, reply comments, pleadings, briefs, or other documents shall be furnished the Commission. 6. Public Inspection of Filings. All filings made in this proceeding will be available for examination by interested parties during regular business hours in the Commission's Reference Information Center, at its headquarters, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules requires that all pleadings filed by parties not represented by legal counsel be signed and verified by the petitioner and provide the petitioner's mailing address. In this case, petitioner signed the petition and provided its address. However, it did not submit a statement attesting that the information included in the petition is correct and true to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-428A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-428A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-428A1.txt
  • examination by interested parties during regular business hours in the Commission's Reference Center (Room CY-A257) at its headquarters, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. Although petitioner's request indicates that the original copy of his proposal was signed, petitioner failed to include an affidavit verifying that the statements contained in his petition were accurate to the best of his knowledge. Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules requires that the original of any document filed with the Commission by a party not represented by counsel must be signed and verified by the party and his/her address stated. In absence of such verification, the petition may be dismissed. Section 1.401(b) of the Commission's Rules concerning rule making proceedings places petitioners on notice that their
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-60A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-60A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-60A1.txt
  • Regulations, an original and four copies of all comments, reply comments, pleadings, briefs, or other documents shall be furnished the Commission. 6. Public Inspection of Filings. All filings made in this proceeding will be available for examination by interested parties during regular business hours in the Commission's Reference Information Center, at its headquarters, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules requires that all pleadings filed by parties not represented by legal counsel be signed and verified by the petitioner and provide the petitioner's mailing address. In this case, petitioner signed the petition and provided his address. However, he did not submit a statement attesting that the information included in his petition is correct and true to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-692A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-692A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-692A1.txt
  • Regulations, an original and four copies of all comments, reply comments, pleadings, briefs, or other documents shall be furnished the Commission. 6. Public Inspection of Filings. All filings made in this proceeding will be available for examination by interested parties during regular business hours in the Commission's Reference Information Center, at its headquarters, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules requires that all pleadings filed by parties not represented by legal counsel be signed and verified by the petitioner and provide the petitioner's mailing address. In this case, petitioner signed the petition and provided his address. However, he did not submit a statement attesting that the information included in his petition is correct and true to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-693A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-693A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-693A1.txt
  • Twelfth Street, SW, Washington, D.C. Parker, Arizona, is already served by AM Station KLPZ, 1380 kHz, and two FM Stations: KWFH, Channel 211A, and KVEZ , Channel 257C2. Parker is an incorporated town with a population of 2,897 persons. Quartzside is already served by Station KBUX(FM), Channel 232A. Quartzside is an incorporated town with a population of 1,876 persons. Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules requires that all pleadings filed by parties not represented by legal counsel be signed and verified by the petitioner and provide the petitioner's mailing address. In this case, the petitioner signed the petition and provided its address. However, it did not submit a statement attesting that the information included in the petition is correct and true
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-802A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-802A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-802A1.txt
  • these orders collectively as the Carrier Change Orders. 47 C.F.R. �� 64.1100 - 64.1190. On March 2, 2001, PNG filed a Petition for Waiver relating to PNG's acquisition of the customer bases of U.S. TeleStar Communications Group, Inc. and LDC Consultants, Inc. (Waiver Petition). Because PNG's counsel inadvertently failed to sign the March 2 Waiver Petition, as required by section 1.52 of our rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.52, PNG refiled the petition with counsel's signature on March 28, 2001. 47 U.S.C. � 258. The Commission's rules and orders clearly contemplate that a switchless reseller may be a customer's preferred carrier. Therefore, changes to a customer's preferred carrier that do not involve a change in the customer's underlying facilities-based carrier are nonetheless
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-804A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-804A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-804A1.txt
  • 3,774 persons. Petitioner states that Eagle Lake is a Class A General Law City with a City Manager-Council form of government. It has a post office and a zip code (77434). Although the petitioner's request was signed, it failed to include an affidavit verifying that the statements contained in the petition were accurate to the best of his knowledge. Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules requires that the original of any document filed with the Commission by a party not represented by counsel be signed and verified by the party and his/her address stated. In the absence of such verification, the petition may be dismissed. Section 1.401(b) of the Commission's Rules concerning rule making proceedings places petitioners on notice that their
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-819A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-819A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-819A1.txt
  • . . shall be submitted to the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, D.C., 20554'') (emphasis added). Id. at � 1.7 (``[P]leadings and other documents are considered to be filed with the Commission upon their receipt at the location designated by the Commission"). In addition, as further required by section 1.106(i), Edmark's Petition does not comply with sections 1.49(a), 1.51(c)(2), and 1.52 of the Commission's rules. Id. at � 1.106(i) (``Petitions for Reconsideration . . . shall conform to the requirements of �� 1.49, 1.51, and 1.52'') (emphasis added); � 1.49(a) (requiring all pleadings to be typewritten or prepared by mechanical processing methods); � 1.51(c)(2) (designating number of copies to be filed); � 1.52 (requiring that a party not represented by counsel
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1149A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1149A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1149A1.txt
  • same time period. Repeater further contends that the Branch erred in considering Bay's Section 308(b) Response because it was filed by a non-party to the proceeding and not verified by a declaration under penalty of perjury. Repeater argues that the Section 308(b) Response is invalid because Bay's station manager, who is not an attorney, signed the document without verification. Section 1.52 of the Commission's rules requires an attorney of record to sign any document filed with the Commission in his or her individual name and address. A party who files a document, but is not represented by counsel, must sign and verify the document and state his or her address. We find good cause to waive the verification requirement of Section
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1246A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1246A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1246A1.txt
  • Owen, Wisconsin --- 242C3 Coordinates: 45-03-08 NL and 90-29-21 WL Additional Information: The proposed allotment of Channel 242C3 at Owen requires a site restriction of 12.9 km (8.0 miles) northeast of Owen at the coordinates indicated above. Petitioner states that Owen is a city with a population of 936 persons according to the 2000 US Census Statistics. In compliance with �1.52 of the Commission's rules, petitioner is requested to include with its comments verification that the statements contained in the petition are accurate to the best of the affiant's knowledge. FCC Contact: Deborah A. Dupont (202) 418-7072 B. MB Docket No. 02-121; RM-10443 Petitioner: Jeff Barth 4937 Heathmoore Court Louisville, Kentucky 40241 Proposal: Allot Channel 232A at Hartington, Nebraska as the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1389A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1389A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1389A1.txt
  • (202) 418-2180. Questions related to the application filing process for Channel 269C3 at Mason, Texas, should be addressed to the Audio Division, Media Bureau, (202) 418-2700. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION John A. Karousos Assistant Chief, Audio Division Office of Broadcast License Policy Media Bureau The Notice requested that Crawford and Pyeatt submit a subscription and verification statement in compliance with Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules. Crawford and Pyeatt have responded with the requested statements. The coordinates for Channel 269C3 at Mason are 30-45-00 and 99-10-14. In the Report and Order in MM Docket No. 99-257, 15 FCC Rcd 9179 (2000), the Commission substituted Channel 281C2 for vacant Channel 249C2 at Mason, Texas. Federal Communications Commission DA 02-1389 Federal Communications Commission DA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1727A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1727A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1727A1.txt
  • IS FURTHER ORDERED, That this proceeding IS TERMINATED. 6. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact Kathleen Scheuerle, Media Bureau, (202) 418-2180. Questions related to the application filing process for Channel 278A at La Pryor, Texas, should be addressed to the Audio Division, Media Bureau, (202) 418-2700. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION John A. Karousos Assistant Chief, Audio Division Media Bureau Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules requires that all pleadings filed by parties not represented by legal counsel be signed and verified by the petitioner and provide the petitioner's mailing address. Petitioner rectified this omission in comments. The coordinates for Channel 278A at La Pryor are 28-58-09 and 99-56-05. Federal Communications Commission DA 02-1727 Federal Communications Commission DA 02-1727 8 z �L�
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1901A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1901A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1901A1.txt
  • examination by interested parties during regular business hours in the Commission's Reference Center (Room CY-A257) at its headquarters, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. Although petitioner's request indicates that the original copy of his proposal was signed, petitioner failed to include an affidavit verifying that the statements contained in his petition were accurate to the best of his knowledge. Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules requires that the original of any document filed with the Commission by a party not represented by counsel must be signed and verified by the party and his/her address stated. In absence of such verification, the petition may be dismissed. Section 1.401(b) of the Commission's Rules concerning rule making proceedings places petitioners on notice that their
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1948A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1948A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1948A1.txt
  • original and four copies of all comments, reply comments, pleadings, briefs, or other documents shall be furnished the Commission. 6. Public Inspection of Filings. All filings made in this proceeding will be available for examination by interested parties during regular business hours in the Commission's Reference Information Center (Room CY-A257) at its headquarters, 445 12th Street, S.W, Washington, D.C. Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules (47 C.F.R. � 1.52) requires that all pleadings filed by parties not represented by legal counsel be signed and verified by the petitioner and provide the petitioner's mailing address. In this case, the petitioner signed the petition and provided its address. However, it did not submit a statement attesting that the information included in the petition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-204A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-204A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-204A1.txt
  • COMMISSION John A. Karousos Chief, Allocations Branch Policy and Rules Division Mass Media Bureau The community of Reynolds, Georgia, has been added to the caption. Although Hedrick signed the petition for rule making and provided his address, he did not provide a verification statement and was requested to correct the deficiency in responsive comments to the Notice. Pursuant to Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules, all petitions and pleadings filed by parties not represented by legal counsel must, in addition to providing a signature and address, submit a statement attesting that the information included in the filing is correct and true to the best of its knowledge. The verification requirement can be met by a declaration made before any officer authorized
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2199A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2199A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2199A1.txt
  • extent it requests a rulemaking. We take this action pursuant to section 4(i) of the Act and sections 0.331, 1.2, and 1.401(e) of the Commission's rules. Sincerely, Jeffrey S. Steinberg Deputy Chief, Commercial Wireless Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Request for Clarification and Rulemaking, Cellular Directory Information, Inc., February 20, 2002. The CDI Petition is not verified as required in section 1.52 of the Commission's rules. We remind you that the Commission's rules require a party not represented by an attorney to verify pleadings. We find that waiver of the verification requirement of Section 1.52 is warranted in this case to permit consideration of the issues raised in the CDI Petition. 47 C.F.R. � 1.52. Id. at 1-2. See also Letter from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2814A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2814A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2814A1.txt
  • Petitioner: JEM Broadcasting Company, Inc. Elvis Moody, President 101 Christian Lane Bentonville, Arkansas 72712 Proposal: Allot Channel 245A at Jasper, Arkansas, as that community's first local aural transmission service. Community Present Proposed Jasper, Arkansas --------- 245A Coordinates: 36-00-29 NL and 93-11-11 WL Additional Information: The allotment is at city reference coordinates and requires no site restriction. In compliance with � 1.52 of the Commission's rules, petitioner is requested to include with its comments verification that the statements contained in the petition are accurate to the best of its knowledge. FCC Contact: Rolanda F. Smith (202) 418-2180 B. MB Docket No. 02-331; RM-10589 Petitioner: Larry Jackson 7107 Bur Oak Ct. Apt. 1 Louisville, KY 40291 Proposal: Allot Channel 288C2 at Milford, Utah,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3420A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3420A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3420A1.txt
  • at Midway-Hardwick, Georgia, IS DISMISSED. 6. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, That this proceeding IS TERMINATED. 7. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact Kathleen Scheuerle, Media Bureau, (202) 418-2180. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION John A. Karousos Assistant Chief, Audio Division Media Bureau Crawfordville, Georgia, 17 FCC Rcd 15670(MB 2002). As requested in the Notice, petitioner complied with the requirements of Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules by verifying that the information contained in the petition for rule making is true to the best of its knowledge and belief. Sutton proposed the allotment of Channel 234A at Midway-Hardwick, Georgia, as a first local service. Sutton's counterproposal was not accepted in this proceeding as it specified a transmitter site too far away from the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3442A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3442A1.txt
  • of frivolousness, and the Commission, like federal courts, forbids such improper submissions. Consequently, we urge DDA and its counsel to act in accordance with this prohibition in the future. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 151, 154(i), 154(j), 208, and sections 1.52, 1.115(d), and 1.711-1.736 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.52, 1.115(d), 1.711-1.736, and authority delegated by sections 0.111, and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311, the filings of DDA referenced herein ARE DISMISSED, and the proceeding is TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Radhika V. Karmarkar Deputy Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau For administrative convenience,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-488A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-488A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-488A1.txt
  • an original and four copies of all comments, reply comments, pleadings, briefs, or other documents shall be furnished the Commission. 6. Public Inspection of Filings. All filings made in this proceeding will be available for examination by interested parties during regular business hours in the Commission's Reference Center (Room 239) at its headquarters, 1919 M Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules requires that all pleadings filed by parties not represented by legal counsel be signed and verified by the petitioner and provide the petitioner's mailing address. In this case, petitioner signed the petition and provided his address. However, he did not submit a statement attesting that the information included in his petition is correct and true to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-858A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-858A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-858A1.txt
  • school, volunteer fire department and some businesses, e.g., W. J. Transport, Rocket Sanitation, Wyoming Sanitation, Ice Age, Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co., Western Wyoming Beverages, Inc., Van Waters & Rogers, Lyons Machine Services, Four Square Builders, Dowell A Division of Schlumberger Technology Corp., Aspen Welding & Fabrication, Action Plumbing & Heating, Knudsen Asphalt Maintenance, and Pablo & Picasso Painting. Pursuant to Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules, petitioner was requested to provide an affidavit verifying that the statements contained in its petition were accurate to the best of its knowledge, and petitioner has complied accordingly. In response to the request to demonstrate ``community'' status, petitioner states that while Montana City is unincorporated, the city has several businesses, including gas stations, restaurants, a hotel,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1843A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1843A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1843A1.txt
  • IS FURTHER ORDERED, That the aforementioned proceedings ARE TERMINATED. 12. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact Rolanda F. Smith, Media Bureau, (202) 418-2180. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION John A. Karousos Assistant Chief, Audio Division Media Bureau The community of Eastpoint, Florida was added to the captioned. Port St. Joe, Florida, 18 FCC Rcd 791 (MB 2003). In compliance with � 1.52 of the Commission's rules, Petitioner was requested to include with its comments verification that the statements contained in the petition are accurate to the best of its knowledge. Petitioner has complied with this request. See Public Notice, Report No. 2206 released on April 23, 2003. See Stock Island, Florida, 8 FCC Rcd 343 (M.M. Bur. 1993); East Hemet, California, et
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1844A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1844A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1844A1.txt
  • of formal concurrence in the allotment by the Mexican government, the construction permit will include the following condition: ``Operation with the facilities specified for Kermit herein is subject to modification, suspension or, termination without right to hearing, if found by the Commission to be necessary in order to conform to the 1992 USA-Mexico FM Broadcast Agreement.'' In compliance with � 1.52 of the Commission's rules, petitioner was requested to include with its comments verification that the statements contained in the petition are accurate to the best of its knowledge. Petitioner has complied with this request. FCC Contact: Rolanda F. Smith (202) 418-2180. C. MB Docket No. 03-54; RM-10659 Action: At the request of Katherine Pyeatt, we are allotting Channel 257A at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-193A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-193A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-193A1.txt
  • can be allotted to Port St. Joe, consistent with the minimum distance separation requirements of the Commission's Rules provided there is a site restriction 2.2 kilometers (1.4 miles) south to avoid a short-spacing to the application site of Station WWAV, Channel 271C2, Santa Rose, Florida and license site of Station WBGE, Channel 270A, Brainbridge, Georgia. 3. In compliance with � 1.52 of the Commission's rules, Petitioner is requested to include with its comments verification that the statements contained in the petition are accurate to the best of its knowledge. Although the Petitioner's request was signed, it failed to include an affidavit verifying that the statements contained in the petition were accurate to the best of its knowledge. Section 1.52 of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2067A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2067A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2067A1.txt
  • U.S.C. � 154(i), and Section 73.3534(a) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 73.3534(a), that the relief sought in the Informal Comments filed by the Grand MMDS Alliance New York F/P Partnership on March 14, 1996 IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. � 154(i), and Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.52, that the request of Trans Video Communications, Inc. contained in its March 27, 1996 ``Opposition to Informal Comments'' that we issue sanctions against Grand Alliance for filing its Informal Comments IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 309 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2106A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2106A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2106A1.txt
  • auction will be addressed by the Commission in a subsequent order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, That this proceeding IS TERMINATED. 6. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact Rolanda F. Smith, Media Bureau, (202) 418-2180. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION John A. Karousos Assistant Chief, Audio Division Media Bureau See Okeechobee, Florida, 18 FCC Rcd 6202 (MB 2003). In compliance with � 1.52 of the Commission Rules, Petitioner was requested to include with its comments verification that the statements contained in the petition are accurate to the best of its knowledge. Petitioner has complied with this request. The reference coordinates for Channel 291A at Okeechobee are 27-20-30 NL and 80-54-08 WL. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 03-2106 Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2411A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2411A2.txt
  • 3.66 26 42 57N 80 3 9W Bunche Park Dade FL 73.46 4.57 26 40 9N 80 40 9W Vero Beach Indian River FL 94.49 22.56 30 43 7N 81 55 34W HoweyHeight Lake FL 62.79 7.62 26 36 16N 81 33 48W Lehigh Acres Lee FL 62.18 3.05 26 38 16N 81 52 49W Fort Myers Lee FL 61.87 1.52 25 47 35N 80 8 36W Bluefield Martin FL 71.32 2.44 26 10 3N 80 7 4W Big Pine Key Monroe FL 91.44 6.1 30 23 14.5N 86 48 16.7W Wynnehaven Beach Okaloosa FL 91.44 6.1 30 23 14.5N 86 48 16.7W Wynnehaven Beach Okaloosa FL 87.48 5.18 26 42 44N 80 40 58W Runyon PalmBeach FL 80.47 2.13 25
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2990A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2990A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2990A1.txt
  • -- must be filed by November 21, 2003. Reservation showings may not be filed against any vacant FM allotments for which an FCC Form 301 application is pending. NCE Second Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 6703-06. 47 C.F.R. � 73.202(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.401 which, inter alia, incorporates the subscription and verification requirements of 47 C.F.R � 1.52. See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.411. In addition, the Petition for Rulemaking must contain an expression of interest that the petitioner will apply for the requested channel, if successfully reserved. See generally 47 C.F.R. �� 1.401(a) (``any interested person'' may petition for rulemaking),1.401(c) (supportive materials required in a petition for rulemaking). See, e.g., Fort Stockton and Sanderson, Texas, 18 FCC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-584A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-584A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-584A1.txt
  • Texas as that community's second FM commercial aural transmission service. Community Present Proposed Kermit, Texas 292A 229A, 292A Coordinates: 31-51-27 NL and 103-05-32 WL Additional Information: This allotment is at city reference coordinates and requires no site restriction. Since Kermit is located within 320 kilometers (199 miles) of the U.S.-Mexican border, Mexican concurrence has been requested. In compliance with � 1.52 of the Commission's rules, petitioner is requested to include with its comments verification that the statements contained in the petition are accurate to the best of its knowledge. FCC Contact: Rolanda F. Smith (202) 418-2180 C. MB Docket No. 03-54; RM-10659 Petitioner: Katherine Pyeatt 6655 Aintree Circle Dallas, Texas 75214 Proposal: Allot Channel 257A at Leakey, Texas as that community's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-600A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-600A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-600A1.txt
  • 2. As stated in the Appendix to the Notice, a showing of continuing interest is required before a channel will be allotted. It is the Commission's policy to refrain from making an allotment to a community absent an adequate expression of interest. Petitioner has neither demonstrated a continuing interest in the requested allotment nor supplied the verification required by Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules. 3. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, That the petition for rule making filed by Virgil Todd IS DISMISSED. 4. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, That this proceeding IS TERMINATED. 5. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact Deborah Dupont, Media Bureau, (202)418-7072. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION John A. Karousos Assistant Chief, Audio Division Media Bureau Lone Pine, California, 17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-967A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-967A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-967A1.txt
  • persons. Okeechobee has its own city government, police department, fire department, school system, and chamber of commerce. A staff engineering analysis indicates that Channel 291A can be allotted to Okeechobee, consistent with the minimum distance separation requirements of the Commission's Rules, provided there is a site restriction 13 kilometers (8.1 miles) northwest of the community. 3. In compliance with � 1.52 of the Commission's rules, Petitioner is requested to include with its comments verification that the statements contained in the petition are accurate to the best of its knowledge. Although the Petitioner's request was signed, it failed to include an affidavit verifying that the statements contained in the petition were accurate to the best of its knowledge. Section 1.52 of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1281A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1281A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1281A1.txt
  • filings made in this proceeding will be available for examination by interested parties during regular business hours in the Commission's Reference Information Center, at its headquarters, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. Petitioner's petition was signed by Christopher W. Johnson, Vice President, but not verified. The petition also included petitioner's address and the relevant engineering. However, as required by Section 1.52 of the rules, a party not represented by counsel must sign and verify the facts in the petition by including a sworn statement that the facts are true. Petitioner is requested to include this sworn statement with its comments in this proceeding. File No. BLH-2003130AAH (license to cover File No. BPH-20020305AAD). An Order to Show Cause to CXR, Holdings, Inc.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1348A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1348A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1348A1.txt
  • examination by interested parties during regular business hours in the Commission's Reference Center (Room CY-A257) at its headquarters, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. Although petitioner's request indicates that the original copy of his proposal was signed, petitioner failed to include an affidavit verifying that the statements contained in his petition were accurate to the best of his knowledge. Section 1.52 of the Commission's rules requires that the original of any document filed with the Commission by a party not represented by counsel must be signed and verified by the party and his/her address stated. In the absence of such verification, the petition may be dismissed. Section 1.401(b) of the Commission's rules concerning rule-making proceedings places petitioners on notice that their
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1415A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1415A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1415A1.txt
  • Manager SSR Communications Incorporated 5270 West Jones Bridge Road Norcross, GA 30092-1628 Proposal: Allot Channel 300A at Shorter, Alabama, as that community's first local aural transmission service. Community Present Proposed Shorter, Alabama ---------- 300A Coordinates: 32-16-36 NL and 85-56-20 WL Additional Information: This allotment requires a site restriction of 13.3 kilometers (8.3 miles) south of Shorter. In compliance with � 1.52 of the Commission's rules, SSR Communications Incorporated is requested to include with its comments verification that the statements contained in the petition are accurate to the best of its knowledge. FCC Contact: Rolanda F. Smith (202) 418-2180 3. Comments, reply comments, counterproposals and other pleadings filed in response to this multiple docket Notice of Proposed Rule Making should reference only
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1735A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1735A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1735A1.txt
  • Country proposes that Channel 269A remain in Sierra Vista and that Channel 267C3 be allotted to Corona de Tucson as a new allotment and reserved for noncommercial educational (``NCE'') use. 4. We are dismissing the Christian Country Counterproposal for three reasons. First, the Christian Broadcasting was not represented by counsel and did not verify this Counterproposal as required by Section 1.52 of the rules. Second, the Christian Broadcasting Counterproposal did not submit an engineering exhibit demonstrating that its Counterproposal would be in compliance with Commission technical requirements. Even if we were to assume that Christian Broadcasting intended to propose the same coordinates proposed by Cochise Broadcasting, its Counterproposal for a Channel 267C3 allotment at Corona de Tucson would be in contravention
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2131A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2131A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2131A1.txt
  • of Boise Community Radio Project, Inc., we are reserving vacant Channel 280C1 at Weiser, Idaho for NCE use. Coordinates: 44-20-39 NL and 117-07-14 WL Additional Information: In response to the Notice, Boise Community Radio Project, Inc. included in its comments verification that the statements contained in its petition are accurate to the best of its knowledge in compliance with � 1.52 of the Commission's rules. Starboard Media Foundation, Inc. filed supporting comments expressing an interest in applying for vacant Channel 280C1 at Weiser, if reserved for NCE use. No other comments were received in response to this proceeding. 4. Accordingly, pursuant to the authority found in Sections 4(i), 5(c)(1), 303(g) and (r) and 307(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3051A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3051A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3051A1.txt
  • IS FURTHER ORDERED, That this proceeding IS TERMINATED. 6. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact Pam Blumenthal, Media Bureau, (202) 418-1600. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Barbara A. Kreisman Chief, Video Division Media Bureau As stated in the Notice, Glendive failed to include an affidavit verifying the statements in its petition and was directed to comply with the requirements of Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules. However, Glendive did subsequently file the required affidavit and is now in compliance with the Rules. In its petition for rule making, Glendive stated that operating on DTV channel 10 will enable KXGN-DT to reduce its costs and improve its service. � � � ( ) + , - . 0 1 3 4 � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-611A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-611A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-611A1.txt
  • at the time Czelada filed, use of Channel 218C3 at Ubly was precluded by pending applications for noncommercial educational stations on Channel 218A at Bridgeport (File No. BNPED-20000214ABC (dismissed February 18, 2004)) and Fremont, Michigan (File No 20000307AAA). Edwards points out that there were additional defects with Czelada's Petition for Rulemaking, i.e., it was not verified, as required by Section 1.52 of the Rules, Czelada failed to pledge to apply for the channel and construct the station, and Czelada, as an individual, is ineligible to hold an authorization for a noncommercial educational station. See Auburn, et al., Alabama, 18 FCC Rcd 10333 (2003); Lincoln, Osage Beach, Steelville and Warsaw, Missouri, 17 FCC Rcd 6119 (2003). See 47 CFR ��73.501 and 73.509;
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-780A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-780A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-780A1.txt
  • Proposed Rudd, Iowa 268A *268A Coordinates: 43-7-34 NL and 92-54-20 WL MB Docket No. 04-95; RM-10896 Proposal: Reserve Channel 280C1 at Weiser, Idaho for non-commercial use. Petitioner: Jeff Abrams, Chairman Boise Community Radio Project, Inc. 4370 Kitsap Way Boise, ID 83703 Community Present Proposed Weiser, Idaho 280C1 *280C1 Coordinates: 44-20-39 NL and 117-7-14 WL Additional Information: In compliance with � 1.52 of the Commission's rules, Boise Community Radio Project, Inc. is requested to include with its comments verification that the statements contained in the petition are accurate to the best of its knowledge. 5. Comments, reply comments and other pleadings filed in response to this Notice of Proposed Rule Making should reference the docket to which the pleading pertains. The Commission's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-963A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-963A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-963A1.txt
  • 8433 Falls Church, VA 22041 William J. Byrnes, Esq. c/o Radio Bilingue, Inc. 7921 Old Falls Road McLean, VA 22102 David A. O'Connor, Esq. c/o Lifetime Ministries, Inc. Holland & Knight LLP 2099 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 100 Washington, DC 20006 Community Present Proposed Dallas, Oregon 252C3 *252C3 Coordinates: 44-55-6 NL and 123-19-0 WL Additional Information: In compliance with � 1.52 of the Commission's rules, Northwest Community Radio Project is requested to include with its comments verification that the statements contained in the petition are accurate to the best of its knowledge. MB Docket No. 04-125; RM-10940 Proposal: Reserve Channel 251C1 at Madras, Oregon for non-commercial use. Petitioner: William J. Byrnes, Esq. c/o Radio Bilingue, Inc. 7921 Old Falls Road McLean,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1282A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1282A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1282A1.txt
  • Order, 9 FCC Rcd 2348, 2375-81 �� 161-88 (1994) (purpose of short-form application deadlines). See Auction No. 59 Procedures Public Notice, 19 FCC Rcd 24,445. Further, we find that the expense of time and resources to address what appear to be frivolous arguments is a detriment to the public interest. A filing may be deemed frivolous under 47 C.F.R. � 1.52 if there is no ``good ground to support it.'' See ``Commission Taking Tough Measures against Frivolous Pleadings,'' Public Notice, 11 FCC Rcd 3030 (1996). 47 C.F.R. � 0.331. Mr. Ameer Flippin DA 05-1282 May 12, 2005 Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 $ � � ? A � � � � � � � � � �e ���A&3+"� �C��b�M�*[�*K*�� G3�d"��''�
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1889A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1889A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1889A1.txt
  • 20 FCC Rcd at 5771, � 12. Id. FCC 05M-13 (rel. Mar. 17, 2005). See.Judge's Ex. 2. Id. at 1-2. Id. at 4. See Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 05M-16 (rel. Mar. 30, 2005) (``MO&O''). Specifically, the MO&O concluded that the Show Cause Reply and its submission to the Presiding Judge were in violation of sections 0.401, 1.7, 1.47, 1.51(a)(1), 1.52, 1.209, 1.211, 1.291(a)(4), and 1.296 of the Commission's Rules. Id. at 2, � 4. Id. Id. at 2, � 5. Id. at 2, n.2. Id. at 3. See Judge's Ex. 3. Id. at 1. As noted above, the Media Bureau canceled the license for Station K216EQ on May 9, 2005. See Dismissal Order, note 4 supra, at 2, � 5.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-290A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-290A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-290A1.txt
  • All filings made in this proceeding will be available for examination by interested parties during regular business hours in the Commission's Reference Information Center, at its headquarters, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. The petition was signed by Clyde Scott, Jr., President, but not verified. The petition also included Petitioner's address and the relevant engineering. However, as required by Section 1.52 of the rules, a party not represented by counsel must sign and verify the facts in the petition by including a sworn statement that the facts are true. Petitioner is requested to include this sworn statement with its comments in this proceeding. See Section 73.207(b)(1). The distance between the required site for requested Channel 246A at Homerville and the license
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3212A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3212A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3212A1.txt
  • this proceeding, contact Andrew J. Rhodes, Media Bureau, (202) 418-2180. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION John A. Karousos Assistant Chief Audio Division Media Bureau Holdenville, OK, 16 FCC Rcd 14912 (MMB 2001). The supplement contains a certificate of service that was not included in the Petitioner's reply comments. We will accept this pleading because it will facilitate resolution of this case. Section 1.52 of the Commission's rules requires that all pleadings filed by parties not represented by legal counsel be signed and verified by the petitioner and provide the petitioner's mailing address. Although the Petitioner's rulemaking petition was signed by the Petitioner and included her address, it did not contain a verification statement. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.207. The required spacing between Channel
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3328A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3328A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3328A1.txt
  • estimate by the North Central Texas Council of Governments that in early 2004 McKinney's population was 82,800; similar estimate of households by McKinney's City Planning Department). See, e.g., Comcast of Dallas, L.P. (``Dallas''), DA-05-2950 at � 9 & n.31 (rel. Nov. 14, 2005); Mediacom Minnesota LLC, 18 FCC Rcd 12768, 12770-71 (2003) � 8. 18,186 Census 2000 McKinney households times 1.52 equals 27,643 estimated 2005 McKinney households. 9,757 McKinney DBS subscribers divided by 27,643 estimated McKinney households equals 35.3%. 47 U.S.C. � 543(l)(1)(b)(ii); see also Reply at 2. Opposition at 4. 47 U.S.C. � 543(l)(1)(A). Comcast Petition CSR 6398-E at 9-10 (16.26% cable penetration in Cockrell Hill); Comcast Petition CSR 6401-E at 9-10 (1.11% cable penetration in Hebron). 47 C.F.R. �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1479A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1479A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1479A1.txt
  • fraudulent because Rick Morrison, the president and sole owner of RJM, died on June 3, 2004, yet the petition for reconsideration bearing his signature was filed on April 3, 2006; and (3) the petition presents no new information to contradict the findings in the March 2, 2006, staff decision. A petition for reconsideration must comply with the requirements of Section 1.52 of the Rules. Section 1.52 of the Rules requires documents submitted to the Commission to be signed by an attorney or a party. A party's signature verifies that such party has read the document; that to the best of his or her knowledge, information, and belief there is good ground to support it; and that it is not interposed for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1585A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1585A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1585A1.txt
  • A minimum distance separation of 165 kilometers is required in this instance. However, if Station WKQL(FM) is reclassified to operate as a Class C0 facility, the short spacing issue will be eliminated. The petition was signed by Clyde Scott, Jr., President, but not verified. In response to the Notice, Petitioner's comments included his signed sworn statement as required by Section 1.52 of the rules. See 1998 Biennial Regulatory Review-Streamlining of Radio Technical Rules in Parts 73 and 74 of the Commission's Rules, 15 FCC Rcd 21,649 (2000). See 47 C.F.R. �� 73.3573, n. 4 and 1.420(g), n.2. See also Second Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 21,662, � 26. See In Re Reclassification of License of Station WKQL(FM), Jacksonville, Florida,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-342A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-342A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-342A1.txt
  • between these proposals is 11.6 kilometers. See Santa Isabel, PR and Christiansted, VI, 3 FCC Rcd 2336 (1988), aff'd. sub nom. Amor Family Broadcasting v. FCC, 918 F.2d 960 (D.C. Cir. 1990). Although BK Radio (``BK'') submitted an expression of interest in the proposed Butler allotment, its comments were unacceptable and not considered because BK did not comply with Section 1.52 of the Commission's rules. This rule requires that all pleadings filed by parties not represented by legal counsel be signed and verified by the petitioner and provide the petitioner's mailing address. While BK's comments were signed by a partner and an address was provided, no verification statement was supplied. BK did not file a petition for reconsideration of the dismissal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A4.txt
  • 3.11 1.06 3.42 Eitheroftheabove 5.03 1.90 5.52 FamilyProgramming NetworksTargetingFamilies 10.93 0.00 12.61 TY-GProgramming 11.59 17.05 10.75 Arts,Educational,orDocumentaryProgramming 7.60 6.46 7.77 Eitherofthetwoabove 19.18 23.50 18.52 AdultProgramming NetworksShowingAdultProgramming 4.98 0.00 5.75 NC-17MoviesorTV-MA-S/TV-MA-LTV 0.67 0.39 0.72 ViolentProgramming "ViolentProgramming" 1.70 0.53 1.88 TV-PG-VTelevision 1.46 2.31 1.33 TV-14-VTelevision 1.47 2.07 1.37 TV-MA-VTelevision 0.19 0.12 0.20 Anyofthethreeabove 3.11 4.50 2.90 Anyofthelasttwoabove 1.65 2.18 1.57 ReligiousProgramming NetworksShowingPrimarilyReligiousProgramming 1.52 7.58 0.58 "ReligiousProgramming" 3.03 11.76 1.69 OverallTargeting AverageTVContentRating(wherenotedforTV) 3.81 3.66 3.86 AverageMPAARating(wherenotedformovies) 3.96 4.00 3.95 Observations 265,388 35,448 229,940 Notes:Reportedinthetableisthepercentageofquarter-hoursofprogrammingononeof27broadcast televisionnetworks(cf.Table5)or192cabletelevisionnetworks(cf.Table27-28)between6:00p.m.and 12:00a.m.EST(ortheequivalent)duringeachofthetwoweeksperyearfor4years(cf.Table1)devoted toprogrammingofthelistedtypes.SeeSection4.2forfurtherdetailaboutthedefinitionofprogramtypes. Source:Authorcalculations. 35 Table7: ProgramAvailabilitybyProgramType 6:00p.m.-12:00a.m.EST(orequivalent),2weeks/year,2003-2006 AllBroadcast Cable Variable Networks NetworksNetworks NewsProgramming AnyNews 48.00 66.38 36.74 NetworkNews 52.81 76.26 1.23 LocalNews 47.33 63.54 39.09 PublicAffairsProgramming 56.64 40.49 61.47 MinorityProgramming NetworksTargetingBlackAudiences 20.99 - 20.99 TargetingLatinoAudiences OnNetworksTargetingLatinoAudiences 13.47 31.39 7.53
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A5.txt
  • 0.9999 -0.0004 0.1810 0.9996 0.00 Distance between Station and Parent (in ln(miles)) 0.0078 0.8140 1.0078 0.1469** 0.0120 1.1583 -3.51 Waived Prohibition on In-Market Newspaper Cross- ownership (1=yes) 0.3260 0.3140 1.3855 -19.4672***0.0000 0.0000 98.20 Cross-owned with TV Station in DMA (1=yes) 0.2773 0.1150 1.3196 0.2503 0.4850 1.2844 22.95 Percentage of Other Market Stations with News Format -0.0162***0.0010 0.9840 -0.0058 0.6600 0.9942 -1.52** Total Stations in the Market 0.0049* 0.0910 1.0049 -0.0001 0.9850 0.9999 0.51 Market Median Commute Time 0.0319* 0.0730 1.0324 -0.0195 0.6040 0.9807 3.91* Percentage of Market Population Male 0.0925 0.2080 1.0969 0.0388 0.7130 1.0395 8.52 Percentage of Market Population Black or African American -0.0003 0.9660 0.9997 0.0382***0.0000 1.0390 -1.15* Percentage of Market Population Hispanic or Latino -0.0129***0.0020 0.9872 0.0282***0.0020 1.0286
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • T-Stat Marg. Effect T-Stat Adj R-Squared N Format 101 Count 2.867 (0.27) 0.296* (5.96) 10.3716 (0.44) 1.871 (0.58) 0.001932* (3.45) 0.726 104 Format 101 HHI -0.098 (1.17) -0.001 (1.45) -0.1761 (-0.95) 0.013 (0.51) -0.000011* (-2.52) 0.072 104 Format 20 Count 1.226 (0.17) 0.116* (3.55) 11.1151 (0.72) 0.578 (0.27) 0.000810* (2.20) 0.426 104 Format 20 HHI -0.203 (1.94) -0.001 (1.79) -0.3479 (-1.52) 0.025 (0.80) -0.000008 (-1.42) 0.074 104 Format 11 Count -0.441 (0.13) 0.040* (2.47) -4.0090 (-0.53) -1.588 (-1.53) 0.000417* (2.31) 0.209 104 Format 11 HHI -0.219* (2.23) -0.001 (1.55) -0.4659* (-2.17) 0.020 (0.67) -0.000009 (-1.67) 0.035 104 With Demographics: Format 101 Count 11.711 (1.10) 0.268* (4.96) 11.8832 (0.50) 2.130 (0.64) 0.001146 (1.93) 0.763 104 Format 101 HHI -0.154 (1.76) -0.001 (1.39)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A7.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A7.txt
  • (3) (4) (5) Local station ownership Cross-owned newspaper 25.7 (0.65) 8.4 (0.15) -10.2 (0.20) 25.0 (0.59) 12.6 (0.38) Cross-owned radio station -301.4*** (2.88) -264.8** (2.64) -213.0*** (3.01) -170.6*** (2.77) Cross-owned radio and newspaper 239.6* (1.73) 285.2** (2.29) 258.3** (2.57) 210.2** (2.30) Parent company coverage of all television households (%) 12.0*** (3.39) 10.4*** (3.40) 5.3* (1.87) Network owned and operated -129.1 (1.52) -175.0* (1.89) -68.4 (0.83) Network affiliation (omitted category is CW\MyNetwork) ABC 33.6 (0.34) 276.4*** (3.51) CBS -42.0 (0.43) 234.3*** (2.94) FOX 276.0** (2.54) 157.4* (1.94) NBC -52.7** (0.51) 225.8*** (2.74) Other control variables Time and length of broadcast fixed effects No No No No Yes DMA and date fixed effects Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Adjusted R-squared .35 .41 .46
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A8.txt
  • 31-33 Manufacturing 3.33 88.19 0.67 0.45 3.81 42 WholesaleTrade 3.58 85.31 0.56 0.23 7.07 44-45 RetailTrade 3.47 86.28 1.18 0.40 8.27 48-49 Transportation&Warehousing 5.29 88.82 2.82 0.51 1.98 51 Information 2.48 81.84 1.82 0.35 3.81 515112 RadioStations 3.06 76.84 3.58 0.14 1.87 515120 TVStations 3.66 53.98 2.96 0.00 3.65 511110 NewspaperPublishers 1.48 87.68 2.29 0.94 3.04 52 FinanceandInsurance 2.71 85.31 1.52 0.34 2.27 53 RealEstate,Rental,Leasing 2.18 86.35 0.95 0.24 3.24 54 Prof.,Scienti�c,Tech.Svcs. 2.66 89.79 1.51 0.45 4.12 55 Mgmt.ofCompanies 0.83 58.59 0.63 0.23 1.69 56 Admin.Support,Waste Mgmt.,RemediationSvc. 5.23 88.62 3.21 0.60 2.48 61 EducationalServices 2.19 55.90 1.91 0.40 3.24 62 HealthCare&SocialAssist. 3.58 74.30 3.58 0.38 7.96 71 Arts,Entertainment,Recreation 1.63 72.64 1.78 0.26 1.58 81 OtherServices(exceptpublic) 4.92 85.66 2.19 0.43 7.85 AllNon-FarmBusinesses
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4340A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4340A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4340A1.txt
  • to deny''). Id. See also, Secret Communications II, LLC, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 9139 (2003); Heidi Damsky, Order, 13 FCC Rcd 16352 (1998); Pikes Peak Broadcasting Co., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 4626 (1997). Furthermore, Blanchard did not sign or provide her address with her informal objection, rendering it procedurally defective under 47 C.F.R. �� 1.52, 73.3587. 47 U.S.C. � 309(k). Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 October 19, 2007 = > 8 9 ; = > ? I L U n } � � � � � � �%���PNG �` �` b``D� 4 �&)�@�-�@�@�7 H >��O��� p j�� �2�=��k��� �"_� - J��, �Nt�Rb �7�P���U�ZS '��wp��ˈ jP�T{.|�87w]�g��yA�Ҩ-��=T#�O> �#W p����U�^S� �t�''�TxNt�l ۦ��X6`T{������:�r�� �A�R\ )]h]e�M8�I̟`�?K^��� ?C��A�UU �3ꡟ=��A �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4382A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4382A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4382A1.txt
  • a petition for reconsideration ``and any supplement thereto'' must be filed within 30 days of public notice of the action for which reconsideration is sought. Hammond's Supplement was filed more than four months late. The Supplement is accompanied by a ``Motion to Accept Supplement to Petition for Reconsideration.'' It supplies the verification of the Petition required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.52 for pleadings not submitted by an attorney and makes additional arguments in support of the Petition. Because the Petition was timely filed and the Supplement presents new facts not occurring until after the petition deadline, the Motion is granted and the Supplement accepted. Letter to from Peter H. Doyle, Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau to Terry Keith Hammond, Reference 1800B3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5114A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5114A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5114A1.txt
  • Commission. See generally Five State Autotel Order Application for Review. See Nevada Autotel Order, 19 FCC Rcd 20920; Five State Autotel Order, 21 FCC Rcd 11301; Arizona Autotel Preemption Order, 22 FCC Rcd 289. See Arizona Autotel Preemption Order, 22 FCC Rcd at 294-95, para. 14. See Nevada Commission Comments at 6-7; Embarq Comments at 7-9. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.52; Commission Taking Tough Measures Against Frivolous Pleadings, Public Notice, 11 FCC Rcd 303 (1996). Implementation of Cable Television Consumer Protection Act, MM Docket No. 92-265, Public Notice, 9 FCC Rcd 2642, 2657 (1993); see also Nevada Commission Comments at 1; Embarq Comments at 1-3. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 07-5114 Federal Communications Commission DA 07-5114 �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-69A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-69A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-69A1.txt
  • Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. FCC, 476 U.S. 355 (1986) (finding a basis for Commission preemption where compliance with both federal and state law is in effect physically impossible). See Petition at 1. We need not consider whether the Arizona Commission properly addressed Autotel's request for termination of Citizens' rural exemption under section 251(f) on the merits. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.52; Commission Taking Tough Measures Against Frivolous Pleadings, Public Notice, 11 FCC Rcd 303 (1996). We recognize that Autotel has filed an Application for Review of the Five State Autotel Order. The Application for Review is currently pending before the Commission. See Five State Autotel Order Application for Review. Implementation of Cable Television Consumer Protection Act, MM Docket No. 92-265, Public
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1372A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1372A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1372A1.txt
  • Letter, 22 FCC Rcd 18600 (MB 2007), petition for recon. pending (``Toole Decision''). Objection at 2. Id. Id. Opposition at 3-4. Memorandum Opinion and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 15464 (1996) (``Greater Muskegon Broadcasters''). Id. at 15472 (emphasis added). See, e.g., 47 U.S.C. � 309(d); 47 C.F.R. �� 1.17, 1.41 - 1.77, 73.3584, 73.3587, 73.5006, 73.7004. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. �� 1.52, 73.3584(b). Coleman Objection, first unnumbered page. Id., second unnumbered page. Id., second-third unnumbered pages. See 47 U.S.C. � 310(d); Dorothy J. Owens, Debtor-in-Possession, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 5 FCC Rcd 6615 (1990). Cf. Policy Regarding Character Qualifications in Broadcast Licensing, Report, Order and Policy Statement, 102 FCC 2d 1179, 1223-25 (1986) (there should be no presumption that misconduct at one
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1844A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1844A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1844A1.txt
  • from Jose A. Ribas Dominicci, informing the Commission that ``no such person'' existed at that address. Arsuante's copy returned unopened with ``No Such Number'' stamped on the envelope. III. DISCUSSION 8. Procedural Issues. Subscription and Verification. Petitioners or their representing attorneys must ``sign and verify'' all petitions submitted to the Commission for review and ``state [their] address'' pursuant to Section 1.52 of the Rules. Documents signed with ``intent to defeat the purpose of [Section 1.52] . . . may be stricken as sham and false, and the matter may proceed as though the document had not been filed.'' However, the staff may still consider a petition's merits even when it is dismissed for failure to conform to Commission rules and procedures.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1956A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1956A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1956A1.txt
  • pleadings, SHU offers a solution that will accommodate both SHU and Monroe. SHU states that Sepulveda, the original rulemaking petitioner in this proceeding, has failed to file an acceptable expression of interest for its proposal to allot an FM channel at Water Mill because none of Sepulveda's filings were verified. SHU points out that the Commission has strictly enforced Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') in FM allotment proceedings because of the potential for abuse and has not permitted this defect to be cured if it would prejudice other mutually exclusive proposals. Thus, SHU contends that the allotment at Water Mill should be reversed, thereby eliminating the need to make a choice between Channels 277A or 233A at Water
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1988A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1988A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1988A1.txt
  • . . . [and that his] name is being used without . . . [his] knowing [sic] and . . . [his] signature has been forged . . . .'' Johnson states that he is ``not being compensated'' and would like his ``name cleared of any ties to this matter.'' Accordingly, we dismiss the ``unsigned'' Johnson Objection, pursuant to Sections 1.52 and 73.3587 of Rules. On June 24, 2008, an individual identifying himself as ``Ray Smith'' filed an unsigned letter objecting to the Application. Pursuant to Sections 1.52 and 73.3587 of Rules, the original copy of informal objections ``shall'' be signed. Accordingly, we also dismiss the unsigned Smith Objection as procedurally defective. The College's Petition to Deny. The Application specifies that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-57A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-57A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-57A1.txt
  • Smith,'' filed an unsigned letter objecting to the Application, making numerous allegations. On August 1, 2008, counsel for ICR filed a declaration made under penalty of perjury dated July 31, 2008, provided to her by Smith stating that he ``did not submit or authorize the submission of the letter, and [he asks] that the letter be dismissed.'' Pursuant to Sections 1.52 and 73.3587 of Rules, the original copy of informal objections ``shall'' be signed. Accordingly, we also dismiss the unsigned Smith Objection as procedurally defective. Conclusion/Actions. Based on the record before us, we conclude that ICR is qualified to hold an NCE-FM authorization and grant of the Application would serve the public interest, convenience and necessity. The terms of the grant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-619A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-619A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-619A1.txt
  • the MRA Modification Request filed seven months after grant of NSTN's application was untimely and that the NSTN Modification Request filed seven months after grant of MRA's application was proper. We remind counsel that an attorney may be subjected to appropriate disciplinary action pursuant Section 1.24 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.24, for a willful violation of Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.52, which provides that an attorney's signature on a pleading constitutes a certificate by him that there is good ground to support it, to the best of his knowledge, information, and belief. See NSTN Modification Request at 4-5. The San Rafael Hills site is approximately twenty-eight miles from the Sunset Ridge site, thirty-seven
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-773A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-773A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-773A1.txt
  • 09-616 (WTB MD rel. Mar. 19, 2009); Mobile Relay Associates, Order, 23 FCC Rcd 4099 (WTB MD 2008); Mobile Relay Associates, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 3202 (2008). We remind counsel that an attorney may be subjected to appropriate disciplinary action pursuant Section 1.24 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.24, for a willful violation of Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.52, which provides that an attorney's signature on a pleading constitutes a certificate by him that there is good ground to support it, to the best of his knowledge, information, and belief. See Mobile Relay Associates, Order on Reconsideration and Order Proposing Modification, DA 09-619, n.15 (WTB MD rel. Mar. 19, 2009). (...continued
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-888A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-888A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-888A1.txt
  • shall furnish the Commission with an address to be used by the Commission in serving documents or directing correspondence to that licensee,'' and ``the address contained in the licensee's most recent application will be used by the Commission for this purpose.'' 47 C.F.R. � 1.5(a). Ms. Kurian did not state her mailing address on her reply, as required by Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.52. Nor does it appear that she properly served MRA, as required by Section 1.47 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.47. Therefore, we conclude that it was reasonable for MRA to send its motion to strike to Ms. Kurian's Dunster Castle Drive address. Moreover, we note that consideration of the information
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-888A1_Rcd.pdf
  • prevailing extraordinary circumstances."40We disagree. Ms. Kurian obtained STAs authorizing transmission at the same locations and on the same frequencies as some (...continued from previous page) contained in the licensee's most recent application will be used by the Commission for this purpose." 47 C.F.R. � 1.5(a). Ms. Kurian did not state her mailing address on her reply, as required by Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.52. Nor does it appear that she properly served MRA, as required by Section 1.47 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.47. Therefore, we conclude that it was reasonable for MRA to send its motion to strike to Ms. Kurian's Dunster Castle Drive address. 33Moreover, we note that consideration of the information
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-896A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-896A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-896A1.txt
  • of a complete record, and because the Response was served on all parties this proceeding, we grant Cornerstone's request for leave to file the Response. Notice and Preliminary Opposition to Response (filed Aug. 31, 2007). The Petitioners assert that Cornerstone's Opposition was defective and should be disregarded because it was not signed by an authorized person as required by Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.52, and was not supported by an affidavit as required by Section 1.2108(c) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.2108(c). See Reply at 1. We note, however, that because the Opposition was filed electronically, the filer's typed name in the signature block of the Opposition is sufficient to satisfy the Commission's rule
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-896A1_Rcd.pdf
  • of a complete record, and because the Response was served on all parties this proceeding, we grant Cornerstone's request for leave to file the Response. 17Notice and Preliminary Opposition to Response (filed Aug. 31, 2007). The Petitioners assert that Cornerstone's Opposition was defective and should be disregarded because it was not signed by an authorized person as required by Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.52, and was not supported by an affidavit as required by (continued....) 4858 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-896 II. DISCUSSION 5. A petition to deny must set forth "specific allegations of fact sufficient to show that ... a grant of the application would be primafacie inconsistent with [the public interest, convenience, and necessity]."18If
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1441A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1441A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1441A1.txt
  • challenge others' applications in different radio services. See City of El Segundo, Order, 20 FCC Rcd 10105, aff'd, Order on Reconsideration, 20 FCC Rcd 18857 (WTB PSCID 2005). We again remind NSTN's counsel that an attorney may be subjected to appropriate disciplinary action pursuant Section 1.24 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.24, for a willful violation of Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.52, which provides that an attorney's signature on a pleading constitutes a certificate by him that there is good ground to support it, to the best of his knowledge, information, and belief. See National Science and Technology Network, Inc., Order on Reconsideration, 24 FCC Rcd 4089, 4091 n.23 (WTB MD 2009) (citing Mobile
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1441A1_Rcd.pdf
  • standing to challenge others' applications in different radio services. SeeCity of El Segundo, Order, 20 FCC Rcd 10105, aff'd, Order on Reconsideration, 20 FCC Rcd 18857 (WTB PSCID 2005). We again remind NSTN's counsel that an attorneymay be subjected to appropriate disciplinary action pursuant Section 1.24 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.24, for a willful violation of Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.52, which provides that an attorney's signature on a pleading constitutes a certificate by him that there is good ground to support it, to the best of his knowledge, information, and belief. See National Science and Technology Network, Inc., Order on Reconsideration, 24 FCC Rcd 4089, 4091 n.23 (WTB MD 2009) (citing Mobile
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-628A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-628A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-628A1.txt
  • Lewis' Objection as a petition to deny. We will, however, treat the Objection as an informal objection pursuant to Section 73.3587 of the Rules. Other Procedural Defects. Applicants allege that Lewis' pleading contains additional procedural defects. We agree. While Lewis asserts that ``[a]ll Commission copies were signed,'' the pleading received by the Commission is not signed as required by Section 1.52 of the Rules. Moreover, Lewis fails to provide an affidavit to support the allegations made in the Petition, as required by Section 309(d)(1) of the Act. The Commission cannot waive this statutory requirement. Accordingly, for these reasons too, we dismiss Lewis' Objection as a petition to deny. As noted above, we will, however, treat the pleading as an informal objection
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1015A1_Rcd.pdf
  • below Section 25.159(d)'s limits. 19.EchoStar, however, also submitted documentation that it claims shows it is very likely to construct Jupiter 1 and asked us to find that it should therefore no longer be subject to Section 25.159(d)'s limits on filing new applications.51In this regard, EchoStar submitted documentation from Hughes providing information concerning the progress towards construction and launch of Jupiter 1.52 Specifically, the documentation contains a photograph of Jupiter 1 taken at the manufacturing facility. The photograph shows that the panels are complete and have been integrated with the satellite, and that integration of the main body of the spacecraft is underway.53In addition, the documentation includes copies of invoices from the spacecraft manufacturer with notations that Hughes has authorized payment of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1948A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1948A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1948A1.txt
  • documentation while not treating HSARG's established local applicant documentation with the same scrutiny. In its Opposition, HSARG argues that its documentation was in fact sufficient. In its Reply, MBMC's restates the arguments in the Petition and also seeks dismissal of the Opposition due to a procedural defect, namely, that it is allegedly not signed and verified as required by Section 1.52 of the Rules. Discussion. Petition for Reconsideration. Reconsideration is warranted only if the petitioner sets forth an error of fact or law, or presents new facts or changed circumstances which raise substantial or material questions of fact that otherwise warrant reconsideration of the prior action. Furthermore, the Bureau has the authority to dismiss or deny petitions for reconsideration of actions
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-187A2_Rcd.pdf
  • 193 88 24 44,204 4,814 0.00 568.03 7,729.43 205.00 0.76 0.92 0.47 774.97 58.08 MS 2,334 137 84 48 12 17,641 2,204 1.14 279.27 3,019.10 52.28 0.46 0.00 0.00 219.98 85.90 MT 22,680 185 117 55 12 25,783 50,324 34.79 1,400.28 35,527.85 13,667.14 7.26 6,754.65 7.33 2,877.58 56.97 NC 7,084 414 254 78 24 68,148 3,509 0.68 491.64 5,754.77 308.02 1.52 40.11 0.00 498.92 51.48 ND 2,564 63 46 38 6 2,239 2,455 0.00 152.81 3,598.28 578.21 0.00 0.00 0.05 279.87 0.00 NE 6,225 111 73 59 10 10,216 10,321 13.06 599.52 6,484.90 1,591.07 0.55 0.07 1.36 585.78 1.67 NH 2,692 108 62 10 5 14,390 1,369 1.89 245.03 1,845.08 76.53 1.07 6.13 0.00 195.77 4.63 NJ 82222 38 4 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.txt
  • (71) 2009 1.94 1.94 1.66 (38) (46) (83) Contour Measure 2005 2.31 2.80 3.03 (45) (30) (24) 2007 2.05 2.76 2.71 (45) (38) (46) 2009 1.50 1.81 2.07 * (56) (48) (63) Miscellaneous Format Market Measure 2005 3.03 2.51 1.34 (8) (5) (6) 2007 4.54 6.17 4.32 (35) (25) (41) 2009 3.94 4.27 3.43 (51) (44) (79) Contour Measure 2005 1.52 1.77 4.43 (8) (6) (5) 2007 3.46 5.44 * 5.64 * (34) (27) (40) 2009 2.68 3.33 4.75 * (47) (49) (78) * - difference between the category mean and the mean of the No LPFM category is statistically different from zero using a two-sided unpaired t-test at the 95 percent level of confidence. Numbers in parentheses are the number
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202669A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202669A1.txt
  • Satellite Service Amendment filed pursuant to the requirements of Section 621 and 624 of the Orbit Act. See FCC Order, DA 00-74, released April 3, 2000. 41 � 27 ' 6.00 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 2120 RIVER RD., NEW HAVEN, SOUTHBURY, CT 73 � 17 ' 23.00 " W LONG. LOCATION: Page 11 of 34 COMSAT LABS 1 1.52 meters ANTENNA ID: 77.00 dBW 6417.5000 - 6443.0000 MHz 24K0F3E 77.00 dBW 6417.5000 - 6443.0000 MHz 600HG1D 77.00 dBW 6417.5000 - 6443.0000 MHz 1K20G1D 77.00 dBW 6417.5000 - 6443.0000 MHz 1K20G1D 77.00 dBW 6417.5000 - 6443.0000 MHz 2K40G1D 77.00 dBW 6417.5000 - 6443.0000 MHz 10K5G1E 4192.5000 - 4200.0000 MHz 600HG1D 4192.5000 - 4200.0000 MHz 1K20G1D 4192.5000 - 4200.0000 MHz 2K40G1D
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Representative Monthly Charge 1/ $12.58 $12.44 $12.32 $12.30 $12.36 $13.03 $13.05 $13.16 $13.19 $13.62 $13.71 $13.67 $13.75 $13.77 $13.64 Subscriber Line Charges 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 3.54 3.53 3.52 3.58 4.50 Additional Monthly Charge for Touch- Tone Service 1.57 1.52 1.54 1.52 1.33 1.06 0.97 0.94 0.77 0.44 0.30 0.25 0.10 0.09 0.06 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.39 2.48 2.57 Total Monthly Charge $17.70 $18.18 $18.11 $19.05 $19.24 $19.77 $19.72 $19.95 $19.81 $20.01 $19.95 $19.88 $19.76 $19.93 $20.78 Basic Connection Charge $45.63 $44.04 $42.94 $43.06 $43.06 $42.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A8.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A8.txt
  • CHR/NR 9 0.14 Classic AOR(CL AOR) 151 2.76 CHR/U 56 0.89 Ethnic (E) 16 0.29 CL 70 1.11 Easy Listening (EZ) 2 0.04 CL AOR 284 4.5 EZ/New Age Contemp. (NAC) 1 0.02 CL HITS 83 1.31 EZ/SAC 3 0.05 E 14 0.22 FS 202 3.69 EZ 13 0.21 FS/T 41 0.75 EZ/SAC 1 0.02 G 55 1 FS 96 1.52 G/B 1 0.02 FS/T 81 1.28 Jazz (J) 59 1.08 G 62 0.98 News (N) 37 0.68 J 118 1.87 News/Talk (N/T) 161 2.94 KIDS 1 0.02 NAC/AOR 2 0.04 N 75 1.19 O 352 6.43 N/T 170 2.69 Religious (REL) 200 3.65 O 394 6.24 Soft Adult Contemp. (SAC) 379 6.92 REL 276 4.37 SP 172 3.14 SAC 253
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226883A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226883A1.txt
  • transmit/receive earth stations (KA 312) to add ALSAT as point of communication, to add additional emissions, increase EIRP and EIRP density, and to change assigned frequencies to communicate with domestic satellites. 41 � 27 ' 6.30 " N LAT. SITE ID: SOUTHBURY 2120 RIVER RD., NEW HAVEN, SOUTHBURY, CT 73 � 17 ' 21.40 " W LONG. LOCATION: COMSAT LABS 1.52M 1.52 meters ANTENNA ID: 31.00 dBW PILOT 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz NON 36.00 dBW ANALOG CARRIER 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 24K0F3E 36.00 dBW DIGTIAL CARRIER 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 10K5G2F Page 28 of 63 36.00 dBW DIGTIAL CARRIER 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 1K20G1D 36.00 dBW DIGTIAL CARRIER 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 1K20G2D 36.00 dBW DIGTIAL CARRIER 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-232865A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-232865A1.txt
  • of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Grant of Authority Telenor Satellite, Inc. KA312 SES-MOD-20020919-01620E Nature of Service:Domestic Mobile-Satellite Service, Fixed Satellite Service, Feeder Link for Mobile Satellite Service, International Mobile Satellite Service 41 � 27 ' 6.30 " N LAT. SITE ID: SOUTHBURY 2120 RIVER RD., NEW HAVEN, SOUTHBURY, CT 73 � 17 ' 21.40 " W LONG. LOCATION: COMSAT LABS 1.52M 1.52 meters ANTENNA ID: 31.00 dBW PILOT 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz NON 36.00 dBW ANALOG CARRIER 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 24K0F3E 36.00 dBW DIGTIAL CARRIER 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 10K5G2F 36.00 dBW DIGTIAL CARRIER 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 1K20G1D 36.00 dBW DIGTIAL CARRIER 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 1K20G2D 36.00 dBW DIGTIAL CARRIER 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 2K40G2D 36.00 dBW DIGTIAL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.txt
  • 1.27 0.84 0.73 0.62 0.43 0.24 -81.5 Netherlands 1.03 1.02 0.86 0.78 0.57 0.50 0.40 0.44 0.47 0.38 0.21 -58.4 Nigeria 1.14 1.17 1.09 1.08 0.86 0.79 0.68 0.67 0.42 0.41 0.31 -61.5 Pakistan 1.77 1.70 1.56 1.53 1.24 1.12 0.99 0.74 0.67 0.46 0.29 -74.2 Peru 1.14 1.07 1.03 1.03 0.87 0.87 0.80 0.67 0.49 0.31 0.20 -77.5 Philippines 1.52 1.41 1.29 1.29 1.08 0.96 0.76 0.62 0.47 0.31 0.26 -73.4 Poland 1.10 1.06 0.90 0.85 0.73 0.76 0.57 0.41 0.39 0.37 0.26 -65.2 Russia 1.99 1.94 1.82 1.57 1.28 1.17 0.69 0.62 0.43 0.27 0.24 -79.6 Saudi Arabia 1.34 1.41 1.25 1.20 1.05 1.08 1.00 0.88 0.75 0.53 0.30 -72.6 Sierra Leone 1.93 1.94 1.78 1.80 1.22 1.07 0.47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255118A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255118A1.txt
  • Born before 1984 -0.74 (1.62) -1.08** (2.01) Duration 2 years -1.03*** (3.91) Duration 3 years -0.93*** (3.36) Duration 4 years -0.49* (1.91) Duration 5 years -0.82** (2.43) Duration 6 years -1.92*** (3.23) Duration 7 years -0.44 (1.25) Duration 8 years -0.60 (1.36) Duration 10 years -0.47 (3.47) Duration 12 years -0.35 (0.55) Duration 13 years -1.03 (0.98) Duration 19 years 1.52 (1.29) Constant Observations 305 305 Failures 96 96 Likelihood Ratio -364.60*** -324.91*** * - significant at 10% level, ** - significant at 5% level, *** - significant at 1% level 25 D. Discussion of Results This study concludes that the piecewise-constant model generates the most reliable results. The piecewise-constant hazards model allows for a completely flexible hazard form and does
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262571A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262571A1.txt
  • Service Modification filed to add the new Inmarsat 4F2 satellite at 52.75 W as a point of communication using frequencies in the 1626.5-1660.5 and 1525-1559 MHz bands. 41 � 27 ' 6.30 " N LAT. SITE ID: SOUTHBURY 2120 RIVER RD., NEW HAVEN, SOUTHBURY, CT 73 � 17 ' 21.40 " W LONG. LOCATION: Page 8 of 35 COMSAT LABS 1.52M 1.52 meters ANTENNA ID: 31.00 dBW PILOT 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz NON 36.00 dBW ANALOG CARRIER 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 24K0F3E 36.00 dBW DIGTIAL CARRIER 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 10K5G2F 36.00 dBW DIGTIAL CARRIER 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 1K20G1D 36.00 dBW DIGTIAL CARRIER 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 1K20G2D 36.00 dBW DIGTIAL CARRIER 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 2K40G2D 36.00 dBW DIGTIAL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • 8.25 13.50 13.49 Connecticut 6.10 7.53 7.53 1.18 1.18 1.18 0.59 0.59 0.59 6.69 8.12 8.12 7.87 9.30 9.30 Delaware 8.23 8.23 8.23 2.30 2.30 2.30 1.15 1.15 1.15 9.38 9.38 9.38 11.68 11.68 11.68 District of Columbia 5.62 5.62 5.62 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 7.37 7.37 7.37 10.87 10.87 10.87 Florida 8.25 8.25 8.25 3.04 3.50 3.50 1.52 1.75 1.75 9.77 10.00 10.00 12.81 13.50 13.49 Georgia 6.50 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 3.40 0.00 1.75 1.70 6.50 10.00 9.95 6.50 13.50 13.35 Guam 8.25 8.25 8.25 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 10.00 10.00 10.00 13.50 13.50 13.50 Hawaii 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25 Idaho 6.50 8.25 8.25
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A4.txt
  • 8.25 13.50 13.49 Connecticut 6.10 7.53 7.53 1.18 1.18 1.18 0.59 0.59 0.59 6.69 8.12 8.12 7.87 9.30 9.30 Delaware 8.23 8.23 8.23 2.30 2.30 2.30 1.15 1.15 1.15 9.38 9.38 9.38 11.68 11.68 11.68 District of Columbia 5.62 5.62 5.62 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 7.37 7.37 7.37 10.87 10.87 10.87 Florida 8.25 8.25 8.25 3.04 3.50 3.50 1.52 1.75 1.75 9.77 10.00 10.00 12.81 13.50 13.49 Georgia 6.50 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 3.40 0.00 1.75 1.70 6.50 10.00 9.95 6.50 13.50 13.35 Guam 8.25 8.25 8.25 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 10.00 10.00 10.00 13.50 13.50 13.50 Hawaii 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25 Idaho 6.50 8.25 8.25
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • -0.64 -10.50 -34.07 250298 C GULF TEL. CO.-AL 31.27 -0.09 31.40 0.00 250299 C HAYNEVILLE TEL. CO., INC. -15.26 -2.34 -13.22 -35.30 250300 C HOPPER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., INC. -0.96 -1.86 0.92 -2.47 250301 A FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF LAMAR COUNTY, LLC 14.22 0.92 13.18 105.58 250302 C ALLTEL ALABAMA 2.07 -0.05 2.12 -5.51 250304 C MILLRY TEL. CO., INC. 0.87 -0.64 1.52 -6.05 250305 C MON-CRE TEL. COOP. INC. 1.26 0.88 0.37 -1.18 250306 C FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF ALABAMA, LLC 36.59 -1.91 39.24 2,668.71 250307 C MOUNDVILLE TEL. CO. 0.21 -1.24 1.47 -2.55 250308 C NEW HOPE TEL. COOP., INC.-AL 8.19 -6.67 15.93 23.70 250311 A OAKMAN TEL. CO., INC. 20.14 5.88 13.47 66.56 250312 A OTELCO TELEPHONE LLC 4.10 -0.60 4.73
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.txt
  • Indices - Continued 51711031 5171109 7-19 Year 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003* 2004** Representative Monthly Charge *** $12.58$12.44$12.32$12.30$12.36$13.03$13.05$13.16$13.19$13.62$13.71$13.67$13.75$13.77$13.64$14.49$14.38$14.54$14.53 Subscriber Line Charges 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 3.54 3.53 3.52 3.58 4.50 5.05 5.74 5.86 5.81 Additional Monthly Charge for Touch-Tone Service 1.57 1.52 1.54 1.52 1.33 1.06 0.97 0.94 0.77 0.44 0.30 0.25 0.10 0.09 0.06 0.04 **** **** **** Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.39 2.48 2.57 3.03 3.94 4.12 3.97 Total Monthly Charge 17.70 18.18 18.11 19.05 19.24 19.77 19.72 19.95 19.81 20.01 19.95 19.88 19.76 19.93 20.78 22.62
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 2002 2003 2004 1 2005 2 Representative Monthly Charge 3,4 $12.58 $12.44 $12.32 $12.30 $12.36 $13.03 $13.05 $13.16 $13.19 $13.62 $13.71 $13.67 $13.75 $13.77 $13.64 $14.49 $14.38 $14.54 $14.57 $14.75 Subscriber Line Charges 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 3.54 3.53 3.52 3.58 4.50 5.05 5.74 5.86 5.81 5.81 Additional Monthly Charge for Touch-Tone Service 1.57 1.52 1.54 1.52 1.33 1.06 0.97 0.94 0.77 0.44 0.30 0.25 0.10 0.09 0.06 0.04 a4 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.39 2.48 2.57 3.03 3.94 4.12 4.14 4.19 Total Monthly Charge $17.70 $18.18 $18.11 $19.05 $19.24 $19.77 $19.72 $19.95 $19.81 $20.01 $19.95 $19.88 $19.76 $19.93
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 1.00 Idaho 714,999 90.5 1.11 Illinois 7,323,440 95.0 1.05 Indiana 3,492,042 95.4 1.05 Iowa 1,540,622 81.0 1.23 Kansas 1,380,168 82.7 1.21 Kentucky 2,003,264 91.5 1.09 Louisiana 2,268,720 91.9 1.09 Maine 808,894 82.1 1.22 Maryland 3,606,266 99.8 1.00 Massachusetts 3,779,199 99.9 1.00 Michigan 5,688,091 96.2 1.04 Minnesota 2,703,043 70.1 1.43 Mississippi 1,328,966 92.8 1.08 Missouri 3,247,315 80.0 1.25 Montana 506,462 66.0 1.52 Nebraska 815,003 77.7 1.29 Nevada 1,267,684 95.4 1.05 New Hampshire 754,305 92.6 1.08 New Jersey 5,983,090 99.8 1.00 New Mexico 940,723 84.6 1.18 New York 11,284,257 96.5 1.04 North Carolina 4,596,547 89.6 1.12 North Dakota 347,899 51.7 1.93 N. Mariana Islands 24,480 0.0 NA Ohio 6,372,077 94.9 1.05 Oklahoma 1,732,719 80.2 1.25 Oregon 1,933,674 90.8 1.10 Pennsylvania 7,345,084 95.5 1.05
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A13.txt
  • 19 16 3 15.79 Valor Telecommunications of Texas - Texas TX (14,736) (14,733) (1) 0.01 Qwest - Utah UT 55,606 55,728 (121) (0.22) Verizon New England - Vermont VT (9,078) (8,959) (119) 1.31 Sprint - Central Telephone Company of Virginia VA (100) (77) (23) 23.00 Verizon South - Contel/Virginia VA (11,906) (11,888) (18) 0.15 Verizon Virginia VA (77,517) (76,339) (1,178) 1.52 Verizon South - Virginia VA (916) (916) 0 0.00 Sprint - United Telephone Co. - Southeast - Virginia VA (17) (13) (4) 23.53 CenturyTel of Washington WA 459 407 52 11.33 Verizon Northwest - Contel/Washington WA (622) (595) (27) 4.34 Verizon - Northwest - Washington WA (6,694) (6,644) (50) 0.75 Qwest - Washington WA (41,169) (40,876) (293) 0.71 Verizon West
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A3.txt
  • 1.00 Idaho 714,999 90.5 1.11 Illinois 7,323,440 95.0 1.05 Indiana 3,492,042 95.4 1.05 Iowa 1,540,622 81.0 1.23 Kansas 1,380,168 82.7 1.21 Kentucky 2,003,264 91.5 1.09 Louisiana 2,268,720 91.9 1.09 Maine 808,894 82.1 1.22 Maryland 3,606,266 99.8 1.00 Massachusetts 3,779,199 99.9 1.00 Michigan 5,688,091 96.2 1.04 Minnesota 2,703,043 70.1 1.43 Mississippi 1,328,966 92.8 1.08 Missouri 3,247,315 80.0 1.25 Montana 506,462 66.0 1.52 Nebraska 815,003 77.7 1.29 Nevada 1,267,684 95.4 1.05 New Hampshire 754,305 92.6 1.08 New Jersey 5,983,090 99.8 1.00 New Mexico 940,723 84.6 1.18 New York 11,284,257 96.5 1.04 North Carolina 4,596,547 89.6 1.12 North Dakota 347,899 51.7 1.93 N. Mariana Islands 24,480 0.0 NA Ohio 6,372,077 94.9 1.05 Oklahoma 1,732,719 80.2 1.25 Oregon 1,933,674 90.8 1.10 Pennsylvania 7,345,084 95.5 1.05
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.txt
  • 8.25 13.50 13.49 Connecticut 6.10 7.46 7.46 1.18 1.18 1.18 0.59 0.59 0.59 6.69 8.05 8.05 7.87 9.23 9.23 Delaware 8.17 8.17 8.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.17 8.17 8.17 8.17 8.17 8.17 District of Columbia 5.59 5.59 5.59 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 7.34 7.34 7.34 10.84 10.84 10.84 Florida 8.20 8.25 8.24 3.04 3.50 3.50 1.52 1.75 1.75 9.72 10.00 9.99 12.76 13.50 13.49 Georgia 3.50 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 3.38 0.00 1.75 1.69 3.50 10.00 9.94 3.50 13.50 13.32 Guam 8.25 8.25 8.25 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 10.00 10.00 10.00 13.50 13.50 13.50 Hawaii 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25 Idaho 6.50 8.25 8.14
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • 0.00 0.01 South Carolina 0.96 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.16 0.49 0.18 2.82 South Dakota 4.41 0.08 0.00 0.34 0.00 3.95 0.02 2.05 10.86 Tennessee 0.34 (0.00) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.24 0.17 1.28 Texas 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 (0.00) 0.45 0.27 0.13 1.56 Utah 0.52 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.67 0.18 0.29 1.67 Vermont 1.23 0.00 0.00 1.66 0.00 1.52 0.39 0.87 5.67 Virgin Islands 17.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.82 0.00 0.00 27.05 Virginia 0.05 (0.00) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 1.04 0.09 1.30 Washington 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 (0.00) 0.43 0.61 0.15 1.66 West Virginia 1.01 0.01 0.00 1.72 0.00 0.14 1.28 0.16 4.33 Wisconsin 0.67 0.03 0.08 0.00 0.01 1.22 0.01 0.56 2.57 Wyoming 3.25 0.04 0.00 3.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 75.3 101.1 103.2 101.1 7-20 Year 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004* 2005** Representative Monthly Charge ***$12.58$12.44$12.32$12.30$12.36$13.03$13.05$13.16$13.19$13.62$13.71$13.67$13.75$13.77$13.64$14.49$14.38$14.54$14.57$14.75 Subscriber Line Charges 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 3.54 3.53 3.52 3.58 4.50 5.05 5.74 5.86 5.81 5.81 Additional Monthly Charge for Touch-Tone Service 1.57 1.52 1.54 1.52 1.33 1.06 0.97 0.94 0.77 0.44 0.30 0.25 0.10 0.09 0.06 0.04 **** **** **** **** Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.39 2.48 2.57 3.03 3.94 4.12 4.41 4.19 Total Monthly Charge 17.70 18.18 18.11 19.05 19.24 19.77 19.72 19.95 19.81 20.01 19.95 19.88 19.76 19.93
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • 2004 1 2005 2 Representative Monthly Charge 3 4 $12.58 $12.44 $12.32 $12.30 $12.36 $13.03 $13.05 $13.16 $13.19 $13.62 $13.71 $13.67 $13.75 $13.77 $13.64 $14.49 $14.38 $14.54 $14.57 $14.75 Subscriber Line Charges 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 3.54 3.53 3.52 3.58 4.50 5.05 5.74 5.86 5.81 5.81 Additional Monthly Charge for Touch- Tone Service 1.57 1.52 1.54 1.52 1.33 1.06 0.97 0.94 0.77 0.44 0.30 0.25 0.10 0.09 0.06 0.04 4 4 4 4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.39 2.48 2.57 3.03 3.94 4.12 4.14 4.19 Total Monthly Charge $17.70 $18.18 $18.11 $19.05 $19.24 $19.77 $19.72 $19.95 $19.81 $20.01 $19.95 $19.88 $19.76 $19.93
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 42 79 0.38 23 80 District of Columbia 188 39 148 0.72 43 151 Florida 2,333 874 1,459 7.05 421 1,480 Georgia 1,191 362 828 4.00 239 841 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 149 65 84 0.41 24 85 Idaho 183 61 123 0.59 35 124 Illinois 1,097 415 682 3.30 197 692 Indiana 572 257 315 1.52 91 319 Iowa 305 104 201 0.97 58 204 Kansas 279 83 197 0.95 57 200 Kentucky 400 160 240 1.16 69 244 Louisiana 422 169 253 1.22 73 256 Maine 159 54 105 0.51 30 107 Maryland 699 243 456 2.21 132 463 Massachusetts 798 275 524 2.53 151 531 Michigan 784 335 449 2.17 130 456 Minnesota 544
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A3.txt
  • 42 79 0.38 23 80 District of Columbia 188 39 148 0.72 43 151 Florida 2,333 874 1,459 7.05 421 1,480 Georgia 1,191 362 828 4.00 239 841 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 149 65 84 0.41 24 85 Idaho 183 61 123 0.59 35 124 Illinois 1,097 415 682 3.30 197 692 Indiana 572 257 315 1.52 91 319 Iowa 305 104 201 0.97 58 204 Kansas 279 83 197 0.95 57 200 Kentucky 400 160 240 1.16 69 244 Louisiana 422 169 253 1.22 73 256 Maine 159 54 105 0.51 30 107 Maryland 699 243 456 2.21 132 463 Massachusetts 798 275 524 2.53 151 531 Michigan 784 335 449 2.17 130 456 Minnesota 544
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.txt
  • Hampshire 8.15 8.25 8.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.15 8.25 8.16 8.15 8.25 8.16 New Jersey 7.08 8.25 8.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.08 8.25 8.02 7.08 8.25 8.02 New Mexico 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 3.33 0.00 1.75 1.66 8.25 10.00 9.91 8.25 13.50 13.24 New York 5.93 8.25 8.02 0.00 3.50 3.04 0.00 1.75 1.52 5.93 10.00 9.54 5.93 13.50 12.58 North Carolina 7.45 8.25 7.92 0.00 3.50 3.49 0.00 1.75 1.75 7.45 10.00 9.67 7.45 13.50 13.16 North Dakota 8.23 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 1.73 0.00 1.75 0.86 8.23 10.00 9.11 8.23 13.50 10.84 N. Marianna Islands 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25 Ohio 6.99
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • TEL. CO.-IA 2.85 -2.29 5.26 12.41 351274 A CENTURYTEL OF POSTVILLE, INC. 1.12 -1.42 2.58 -8.30 351275 A PRAIRIEBURG TEL. CO., INC. 18.62 -1.82 20.81 50.99 351276 A PRESTON TEL. CO. 11.05 6.32 4.45 15.18 351277 A RADCLIFFE TEL. CO., INC. 11.19 -1.75 13.18 43.12 351278 A READLYN TEL. CO. 16.77 13.54 2.84 12.96 351280 A RINGSTED TEL. CO. 14.67 -1.52 16.43 47.44 351282 A ROCKWELL COOP. TEL. ASSN. 14.73 -3.34 18.69 48.10 351283 A ROYAL TEL. CO. 17.80 5.30 11.87 43.47 351284 A RUTHVEN TEL. EXCH. CO. -3.52 -8.88 5.88 8.47 351285 A SAC COUNTY MUTUAL TEL. CO. 9.16 -3.18 12.74 42.47 351291 A SCHALLER TEL. CO. 14.49 0.06 14.43 45.69 351292 A SEARSBORO TEL. CO. 111.55 98.90 6.36 122.09
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.txt
  • 107.0 101.5 7-20 Year 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005* 2006** Representative Monthly Charge ***$12.58$12.44$12.32$12.30$12.36$13.03$13.05$13.16$13.19$13.62$13.71$13.67$13.75$13.77$13.64$14.49$14.38$14.54$14.57$14.60$15.03 Subscriber Line Charges 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 3.54 3.53 3.52 3.58 4.50 5.05 5.74 5.86 5.81 5.82 5.98 Additional Monthly Charge for Touch-Tone Service 1.57 1.52 1.54 1.52 1.33 1.06 0.97 0.94 0.77 0.44 0.30 0.25 0.10 0.09 0.06 0.04 **** **** **** **** **** Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.39 2.48 2.57 3.03 3.94 4.12 4.41 4.15 4.26 Total Monthly Charge 17.70 18.18 18.11 19.05 19.24 19.77 19.72 19.95 19.81 20.01 19.95 19.88
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281262A1.pdf
  • 94 SOUTHBURY - MARISAT-F2 - (33.9 W.L.) KA312 SES-AMD-20070112-00109 E Date Effective: 03/27/2008 Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Grant of Authority Amendment Vizada, Inc. Nature of Service: Mobile Satellite Service 41 � 27 ' 6.30 " N LAT. SITE ID: SOUTHBURY 2120 RIVER RD., NEW HAVEN, SOUTHBURY, CT 73 � 17 ' 21.40 " W LONG. LOCATION: COMSAT LABS 1.52M 1.52 meters ANTENNA ID: 31.00 dBW PILOT 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz NON 36.00 dBW ANALOG CARRIER 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 24K0F3E 36.00 dBW DIGTIAL CARRIER 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 10K5G2F 36.00 dBW DIGTIAL CARRIER 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 1K20G1D 36.00 dBW DIGTIAL CARRIER 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 1K20G2D 36.00 dBW DIGTIAL CARRIER 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 2K40G2D 36.00 dBW DIGTIAL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • 0.00 0.61 0.40 2.07 655 1,998 2,580 Citizens 0.20 0.00 0.51 0.51 2.28 1,107 3,957 5,063 Embarq 7 0.00 0.00 0.79 0.17 1.97 4,708 18,683 20,669 Hawaiian Telecom 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.20 1.71 355 1,013 1,839 Iowa Telecom 0.00 0.00 1.59 0.67 4.63 221 331 551 Qwest 0.00 0.00 0.74 0.16 1.84 13,007 24,166 37,296 Verizon 0.03 0.00 0.50 0.22 1.52 30,245 83,119 113,797 Windstream 8 0.00 0.00 0.77 0.48 2.56 245 832 1,120 Price Caps 0.01 0.00 0.53 0.24 1.59 97,723 245,311 345,069 NECA 0.00 0.00 1.30 0.69 4.07 * * 17,063 All Price Caps and NECA 0.01 0.00 0.56 0.26 1.71 * * 362,132 * NECA no longer files information regarding originating and terminating Carrier Common Line (CCL) charges.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 1 2007 2 Representative Monthly Charge 3,4 $12.58$12.44$12.32$12.30$12.36$13.03$13.05$13.16$13.19$13.62$13.71$13.67$13.75$13.77$13.64$14.49$14.38$14.54$14.57$14.66 $15.03 $15.62 Subscriber Line Charges 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 3.54 3.53 3.52 3.58 4.50 5.05 5.74 5.86 5.81 5.82 5.97 5.74 Additional Monthly Charge for Touch-Tone Service 1.57 1.52 1.54 1.52 1.33 1.06 0.97 0.94 0.77 0.44 0.30 0.25 0.10 0.09 0.06 0.04 a4 a4 a4 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.39 2.48 2.57 3.03 3.94 4.12 4.14 4.15 4.26 4.26 Total Monthly Charge $17.70$18.18$18.11$19.05$19.24$19.77$19.72$19.95$19.81$20.01$19.95$19.88$19.76$19.93$20.78$22.62$24.07$24.52$24.52$24.64 $25.26 $25.62 Basic Connection Charge 4 45.63 44.04 42.94
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • -4.09 5.34 5.06 NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS -10.62 -8.10 -2.74 0.00 OHIO -3.33 -7.69 4.73 -2.89 OKLAHOMA 1.91 -6.00 8.41 6.97 OREGON -6.12 -6.57 0.48 8.40 PENNSYLVANIA -0.58 -6.14 5.92 4.50 PUERTO RICO -2.88 -7.78 5.31 152.96 RHODE ISLAND -2.97 -11.64 9.81 0.00 SOUTH CAROLINA -0.12 -5.26 5.43 15.81 SOUTH DAKOTA -3.56 -7.78 4.57 5.78 TENNESSEE -1.13 -5.36 4.47 14.58 TEXAS 1.52 -5.82 7.79 0.97 UTAH -10.16 -4.38 -6.04 -10.28 VERMONT 0.98 -3.14 4.25 -10.24 VIRGIN ISLANDS -4.48 -1.20 -3.33 -16.38 VIRGINIA -2.11 -5.77 3.87 -10.25 WASHINGTON -10.92 -8.22 -2.94 9.16 WEST VIRGINIA -4.04 -5.18 1.20 -8.71 WISCONSIN -0.51 -6.87 6.83 -3.12 WYOMING -15.48 -7.32 -8.81 -7.97 GRAND TOTAL -2.33 -6.49 4.44 1.84 * Percentage changes from 2007 to 2008. Source: Calculated
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A13.pdf
  • (117) (88) (28) 23.93 Windstream/Valor Telecom. of Texas - Texas TX (226) (162) (64) 28.32 Qwest - Utah UT (352) (243) (109) 30.97 Verizon New England - Vermont VT (3,193) (3,161) (32) 1.00 Embarq - Central Telephone Company of Virginia VA 1,441 1,115 326 22.62 Verizon South - Contel/Virginia VA (22,628) (22,612) (16) 0.07 Verizon Virginia VA (92,037) (90,641) (1,397) 1.52 Verizon South - Virginia VA (1,752) (1,752) 0 0.00 Embarq - United Telephone Co. - Southeast - Virginia VA (22) (17) (5) 22.73 Verizon Northwest - Contel/Washington WA (98) (99) 0 0.00 Verizon - Northwest - Washington WA (1,356) (1,217) (139) 10.25 Qwest - Washington WA 285,417 285,627 (210) (0.07) Verizon West Virginia WV (89,231) (88,955) (276) 0.31 Verizon North
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • -4.09 5.34 5.06 NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS -10.62 -8.10 -2.74 0.00 OHIO -3.33 -7.69 4.73 -2.89 OKLAHOMA 1.91 -6.00 8.41 6.97 OREGON -6.12 -6.57 0.48 8.40 PENNSYLVANIA -0.58 -6.14 5.92 4.50 PUERTO RICO -2.88 -7.78 5.31 152.96 RHODE ISLAND -2.97 -11.64 9.81 0.00 SOUTH CAROLINA -0.12 -5.26 5.43 15.81 SOUTH DAKOTA -3.56 -7.78 4.57 5.78 TENNESSEE -1.13 -5.36 4.47 14.58 TEXAS 1.52 -5.82 7.79 0.97 UTAH -10.16 -4.38 -6.04 -10.28 VERMONT 0.98 -3.14 4.25 -10.24 VIRGIN ISLANDS -4.48 -1.20 -3.33 -16.38 VIRGINIA -2.11 -5.77 3.87 -10.25 WASHINGTON -10.92 -8.22 -2.94 9.16 WEST VIRGINIA -4.04 -5.18 1.20 -8.71 WISCONSIN -0.51 -6.87 6.83 -3.12 WYOMING -15.48 -7.32 -8.81 -7.97 GRAND TOTAL -2.33 -6.49 4.44 1.84 * Percentage changes from 2007 to 2008. Source: Calculated
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.pdf
  • 2 Representative Monthly Charge 3,4 $12.58 $12.44 $12.32 $12.30 $12.36 $13.03 $13.05 $13.16 $13.19 $13.62 $13.71 $13.67 $13.75 $13.77 $13.64 $14.49 $14.38 $14.54 $14.57 $14.66 $15.03 $15.62 Subscriber Line Charges 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 3.54 3.53 3.52 3.58 4.50 5.05 5.74 5.86 5.81 5.82 5.97 5.74 Additional Monthly Charge for Touch- Tone Service 1.57 1.52 1.54 1.52 1.33 1.06 0.97 0.94 0.77 0.44 0.30 0.25 0.10 0.09 0.06 0.04 a4 a4 a4 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.39 2.48 2.57 3.03 3.94 4.12 4.14 4.15 4.26 4.26 Total Monthly Charge $17.70 $18.18 $18.11 $19.05 $19.24 $19.77 $19.72 $19.95 $19.81 $20.01
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288384A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288384A1.txt
  • 02/06/2009 Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Grant of Authority 02/27/2009 - 02/27/2024 Renewal Vizada, Inc. Nature of Service: Fixed Satellite Service, Feeder Link for Mobile Satellite Service, Mobile Satellite Service 41 � 27 ' 6.30 " N LAT. SITE ID: SOUTHBURY 2120 RIVER RD., NEW HAVEN, SOUTHBURY, CT 73 � 17 ' 21.40 " W LONG. LOCATION: COMSAT LABS 1.52M 1.52 meters ANTENNA ID: 31.00 dBW PILOT 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz NON 36.00 dBW ANALOG CARRIER 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 24K0F3E 36.00 dBW DIGTIAL CARRIER 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 10K5G2F 36.00 dBW DIGTIAL CARRIER 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 1K20G1D 36.00 dBW DIGTIAL CARRIER 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 1K20G2D 36.00 dBW DIGTIAL CARRIER 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 2K40G2D 36.00 dBW DIGTIAL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292562A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292562A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292562A1.txt
  • part 1 is amended to read as follows: Authority: 15 U.S.C. 79 et seq.; 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(j), 160, 201, 225, and 303. 2. Section 1.49 is amended by adding paragraph (f)(1)(iv) to read as follows: � 1.49 Specifications as to pleadings and documents. (f)(1) (iv) Petition for forbearance proceedings. 3. Subpart A [Amended] Add undesignated center heading below � 1.52 to read as follows: Forbearance Proceedings 4. Add new �� 1.54 through 1.59 as follows: � 1.54 Petitions for forbearance must be complete as filed. (a) Description of relief sought. Petitions for forbearance must identify the requested relief, including: (1) Each statutory provision, rule, or requirement from which forbearance is sought. (2) Each carrier, or group of carriers, for which
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • 1.00 Idaho 632,849 90.4 1.11 Illinois 6,000,648 95.0 1.05 Indiana 2,854,564 95.3 1.05 Iowa 1,291,940 81.0 1.23 Kansas 1,104,052 82.5 1.21 Kentucky 1,667,945 91.5 1.09 Louisiana 1,802,351 91.7 1.09 Maine 675,014 81.9 1.22 Maryland 3,040,460 99.8 1.00 Massachusetts 2,969,742 99.9 1.00 Michigan 4,154,613 96.1 1.04 Minnesota 2,258,483 69.8 1.43 Mississippi 1,117,195 92.8 1.08 Missouri 2,759,571 90.1 1.11 Montana 417,198 65.8 1.52 Nebraska 679,178 77.7 1.29 Nevada 1,077,677 95.4 1.05 New Hampshire 617,676 92.5 1.08 New Jersey 4,516,948 99.8 1.00 New Mexico 822,959 84.3 1.19 New York 8,304,253 96.4 1.04 North Carolina 3,860,991 89.4 1.12 North Dakota 284,695 51.5 1.94 N. Mariana Islands 18,719 0.0 NA Ohio 4,924,217 94.9 1.05 Oklahoma 1,432,001 79.9 1.25 Oregon 1,587,119 91.3 1.09 Pennsylvania 6,108,671 95.5 1.05
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.txt
  • 1.00 Idaho 632,849 90.4 1.11 Illinois 6,000,648 95.0 1.05 Indiana 2,854,564 95.3 1.05 Iowa 1,291,940 81.0 1.23 Kansas 1,104,052 82.5 1.21 Kentucky 1,667,945 91.5 1.09 Louisiana 1,802,351 91.7 1.09 Maine 675,014 81.9 1.22 Maryland 3,040,460 99.8 1.00 Massachusetts 2,969,742 99.9 1.00 Michigan 4,154,613 96.1 1.04 Minnesota 2,258,483 69.8 1.43 Mississippi 1,117,195 92.8 1.08 Missouri 2,759,571 90.1 1.11 Montana 417,198 65.8 1.52 Nebraska 679,178 77.7 1.29 Nevada 1,077,677 95.4 1.05 New Hampshire 617,676 92.5 1.08 New Jersey 4,516,948 99.8 1.00 New Mexico 822,959 84.3 1.19 New York 8,304,253 96.4 1.04 North Carolina 3,860,991 89.4 1.12 North Dakota 284,695 51.5 1.94 N. Mariana Islands 18,719 0.0 NA Ohio 4,924,217 94.9 1.05 Oklahoma 1,432,001 79.9 1.25 Oregon 1,587,119 91.3 1.09 Pennsylvania 6,108,671 95.5 1.05
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • 15,090,302 42,601,319 15,639,298 38,885,392 17,215,121 38,617,397 17,607,951 39,425,676 19,288,388 Industry 1,717,446,369 534,0122,233,276,459 1,494,6422,574,679,349 16,947,9572,888,868,69546,127,1363,135,612,366129,620,5343,152,615,875315,759,8083,168,575,065627,659,4013,143,188,367966,618,5483,112,131,4701,176,893,0363,093,298,7231,384,487,077 Table 3.15 Total High-Cost Support Payments By State or Jurisdiction - ILECs and CETCs (Dollars) 2007 2004 2006 2005 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2008 3 - 28 Alabama $0.60 $0.01 $0.00 $1.31 $0.00 $0.59 $0.58 $0.17 $3.25 Alaska 6.93 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.37 0.00 1.52 15.88 American Samoa 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.74 0.00 2.97 7.71 Arizona 0.87 0.02 (0.00) 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.54 0.28 2.10 Arkansas 3.89 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.93 0.01 0.53 7.37 California 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.17 0.02 0.44 Colorado 1.24 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.81 0.63 0.17 2.86 Connecticut 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (0.01) 0.02
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301505A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301505A1.txt
  • 69,056 38,277 77,891 80,470 2,110 2,039 Operating income 705 642 1,756 2,097 -28,910 -2,642 15,578 16,884 1,151 1,132 Interest Expense 381 363 1,095 1,021 1,433 1,362 1,829 1,819 444 416 Income Taxes 128 106 2,253 418 365 1,264 3,982 3,331 252 283 Net Income (Loss) 215 183 2,917 681 -29,580 -2,796 5,521 6,428 917 413 Earnings per Share 0.65 0.57 1.52 0.39 -10.31 -0.98 1.90 2.26 1.94 0.93 Dividends per Share 1.00 1.00 0.08 0.32 0.10 - 1.67 1.78 1.00 1.00 Average Shares Outstanding (millions) 332 318 1,921 1,737 2,868 2,854 2,902 2,850 472 441 Capital Expenditures 316 288 1,669 1,777 6,322 3,882 17,538 17,238 366 318 Property, Plant and Equipment - Net 3,335 3,240 13,671 13,045 26,496 22,373 85,294 86,546
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
  • 0 0.02 20 0.01 19,087 0.01 Arizona 1,943 1.56 1,218 2.78 13 3.26 4,936 1.93 6,058,782 1.92 Arkansas 1,069 0.86 223 0.51 2 0.58 2,446 0.96 3,098,534 0.98 California 17,149 13.76 4,536 10.37 66 16.36 31,946 12.49 31,440,776 9.96 Colorado 1,973 1.58 838 1.91 8 2.02 4,066 1.59 6,116,346 1.94 Connecticut 1,632 1.31 625 1.43 3 0.68 2,959 1.16 4,795,494 1.52 Delaware 396 0.32 164 0.37 1 0.25 775 0.30 1,391,815 0.44 District of Columbia 788 0.63 182 0.42 0 0.12 1,047 0.41 1,719,594 0.54 Florida 7,932 6.37 2,690 6.15 25 6.25 15,809 6.18 22,233,772 7.04 Georgia 3,675 2.95 1,157 2.65 13 3.21 8,142 3.18 10,993,228 3.48 Guam 62 0.05 28 0.06 0 0.06 73 0.03 221,235 0.07 Hawaii 516 0.41
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A3.txt
  • 0 0.02 20 0.01 19,087 0.01 Arizona 1,943 1.56 1,218 2.78 13 3.26 4,936 1.93 6,058,782 1.92 Arkansas 1,069 0.86 223 0.51 2 0.58 2,446 0.96 3,098,534 0.98 California 17,149 13.76 4,536 10.37 66 16.36 31,946 12.49 31,440,776 9.96 Colorado 1,973 1.58 838 1.91 8 2.02 4,066 1.59 6,116,346 1.94 Connecticut 1,632 1.31 625 1.43 3 0.68 2,959 1.16 4,795,494 1.52 Delaware 396 0.32 164 0.37 1 0.25 775 0.30 1,391,815 0.44 District of Columbia 788 0.63 182 0.42 0 0.12 1,047 0.41 1,719,594 0.54 Florida 7,932 6.37 2,690 6.15 25 6.25 15,809 6.18 22,233,772 7.04 Georgia 3,675 2.95 1,157 2.65 13 3.21 8,142 3.18 10,993,228 3.48 Guam 62 0.05 28 0.06 0 0.06 73 0.03 221,235 0.07 Hawaii 516 0.41
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.txt
  • 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.26 0.05 0.78 PUERTO RICO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.85 0.00 0.00 1.85 RHODE ISLAND 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 SOUTH CAROLINA 1.42 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.25 0.43 0.20 4.36 SOUTH DAKOTA 5.67 0.24 0.01 0.26 0.00 5.59 0.04 1.86 13.67 TENNESSEE 0.38 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.72 0.23 0.13 1.52 TEXAS 0.73 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.25 0.11 1.59 UTAH 0.41 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.16 0.27 1.48 VERMONT 0.67 0.09 0.00 1.54 0.00 1.50 0.42 0.66 4.87 VIRGIN ISLANDS 5.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.26 0.00 0.00 19.24 VIRGINIA 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.91 0.06 1.18 WASHINGTON 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.51 0.13
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.txt
  • Guam 8.25 3.50 1.75 10.00 13.50 NA NA NA NA NA 8.25 3.50 1.75 10.00 13.50 Hawaii 8.25 0.00 0.00 8.25 8.25 NA NA NA NA NA 8.25 0.00 0.00 8.25 8.25 Idaho 8.16 3.47 1.74 9.90 13.37 8.25 2.93 1.46 9.71 12.64 8.17 3.42 1.71 9.88 13.30 Illinois 6.57 0.00 0.00 6.57 6.57 6.43 1.84 0.92 7.35 9.20 6.45 1.52 0.76 7.22 8.74 Indiana 7.51 0.00 0.00 7.51 7.51 7.93 3.45 1.72 9.66 13.11 7.54 0.26 0.13 7.68 7.94 Iowa 7.08 0.00 0.00 7.08 7.08 7.17 0.00 0.00 7.17 7.17 7.09 0.00 0.00 7.09 7.09 Kansas 7.25 3.50 1.75 9.00 12.50 7.05 2.24 1.12 8.17 10.41 7.16 2.93 1.46 8.62 11.55 Kentucky 8.19 3.47 1.74 9.92 13.39 8.55 3.49 1.75
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-435A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-435A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-435A1.txt
  • * * (c) Except for opposition to petitions to deny an application filed pursuant to � 25.220 of this Chapter, oppositions to petitions to deny an application or responses to comments and informal objections may be filed 10 days after the petition, comment, or objection is filed and must be in accordance with other applicable provisions of �� 1.41 through 1.52 of this chapter. (d) Except for opposition to petitions to deny an application filed pursuant to � 25.220 of this Chapter, reply comments by the party that filed the original petition may be filed with respect to pleadings filed pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section within 5 days after the time for filing oppositions has expired unless the Commission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-55A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-55A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-55A1.txt
  • Exhibit B, Letter from Alfred N. Koplin, Hinsdale Management Corporation, to concerned parties (March 13, 1996). Gencom, Inc. v. FCC, 832 F.2d 171, 181 (D.C. Cir. 1987). Application of Wine Country Radio, 11 FCC Rcd 2333, 2334 �6 (1996) (citing Johnson v. United States, 628 F.2d 187 (D.C. Cir. 1980)). Application at 7. 47 C.F.R. � 1.16. 47 C.F.R. � 1.52. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.17. Swan Creek Communications v. FCC, 39 F.3d 1217, 1222 (D.C. Cir. 1994). See 18 U.S.C. � 1001. Quatron Opposition at 6-7; O'Hare Opposition at 6-7. 47 C.F.R. � 90.157(a) (emphasis added). 47 C.F.R. 90.157(a). Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-55 Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-55 8 9 ������� < = ) 9 W � � b
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A3.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A3.txt
  • 1a,4a OR-2-06 % On Time LSR/ASR Reject Facility Check NA NA NA NA Resale: Provisioning Resale POTS PR-2-04 Avg. Interval Completed - Dispatch (6-9 Lines) 2.00 NA NA NA NA NA 6.00 NA PR-2-05 Avg. Interval Completed - Dispatch (>= 10 Lines) 4.00 NA 8.00 NA 14.50 NA NA NA PR-2-01 Avg. Int. Completed - Total No Dispatch - Business 1.52 2.00 1.07 2.09 1.03 2.15 1.07 1.80 1a,2b,3b,4a,1n,4n PR-2-03 Avg. Int. Completed - Dispatch (1-5 Lines) - Bus. 4.31 NA 13.00 4.50 6.60 5.25 4.00 3.00 2a,3a,4a PR-2-01 Avg. Int. Completed - Total No Dispatch - Residence 0.76 NA 0.57 3.50 0.45 2.00 0.89 5.00 2a,3a,4a,3n PR-2-03 Avg. Int. Completed - Dispatch (1-5 Lines) - Res. 7.93 5.00 6.41 NA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-228A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-228A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-228A1.txt
  • Orion is correct that we do not require applicants under the one-step standard for domsats to certify the balance sheets they submit with their applications. Section 25.140(c) of the rules requires applicants to submit their financial-qualification showing under an affidavit that the information in the showing is true to the best of the applicant's knowledge and belief. Furthermore, under Section 1.52 of our rules, the signature of the applicant or its lawyer upon a submission has the effect of a certification by the signing party that the information is true. Similarly, where a parent is making a commitment for its subsidiary, the parent corporation's signature falls within Section 1.52. A parent corporation that commits to finance its subsidiary is risking its
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-107A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-107A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-107A1.txt
  • because the number of channels and the monthly rate shown are weighted separately. ATTACHMENT B-2 AVERAGE MONTHLY RATES, COMPETITIVE GROUP BY STRATA Cable Service Wireline Overbuild DBS Overbuild Local Exchange Carrier (LEC) Low Penetration Municipal July 1, 2001 BST $15.09 $11.01 $11.45 $15.42 $12.77 Standard error 0.99 0.39 0.42 0.79 1.28 Major CPST $16.04 $23.31 $19.85 $17.01 $9.50 Standard error 1.52 1.07 0.57 0.97 2.10 Programming total $31.13 $34.32 $31.30 $32.43 $22.27 Standard error 1.10 0.84 0.46 0.54 1.12 Equipment $2.90 $2.81 $3.73 $1.87 $2.08 Standard error 0.27 0.24 0.14 0.19 0.52 Programming and equipment $34.03 $37.13 $35.03 $34.30 $24.35 Standard error 1.22 1.00 0.51 0.55 1.31 Number of channels 55.98 53.26 65.32 52.94 51.38 Standard error 2.42 2.63 0.88 1.74
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-197A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-197A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-197A1.txt
  • 22,891, Erratum, 17 FCC Rcd 2147 (2001). Lockheed Martin's Motion to Strike LRT's Fourth Supplement to Reply at 3-5, dated September 17, 2001. Public Notice Report No. SAT-00040, August 4, 2000. In addition, LRT has ignored procedural requirements in our rules, including subscription and verification requirements and page limits. Some pleadings filed by LRT are unsigned. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.52 (2001). The supplemental reply comments all exceed the page limits specified in our rules. See 47 C.F.R. � 106(h)(I) (2001). 47 C.F.R. � 1.3 (2001). See Northeast Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) citing WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1970). LRT Further Supplement with newly discovered evidence dated March
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.txt
  • - 2 CLEC Result P*B CLEC Result P*B CLEC Result P*B CLEC Result P*B CLEC Result P*B Notes Pre-Ordering 1 - Average FOC/LSC Notice Interval 1 - 103300Avg Resp Pre-Order Man Fax/Req for CSR 96.5995.00100.0095.00 99.9695.00 98.1195.00 97.6695.00 1 - 103500Avg Resp Pre-Order K1023: xDSL Loop Qual 2.8615.09 2.8419.99 1.8733.32 2.1613.16 4.2219.98 1 - 103501Avg Resp Pre-Order K1023: Manual K1023 1.52 8.36 1.9715.85 1.7212.30 6.9414.27 7.67 7.26 1 - 104101Avg Resp Pre-Order CSR Datagate: Rndtrp 2.0610.00 1.8510.00 2.0710.00 1.7010.00 1.2310.00 1 - 104400Avg Resp Pre-Order Rej/Fail Inq Datagate: Rndtrp 3.72 tbd 5.04 tbd 1.62 tbd 0.98 tbd 0.80 tbd 1 - 104501Avg Resp Pre-Order Addr Verif Verigate: Rndtrp 2.00 4.50 1.78 4.50 1.81 4.50 1.64 4.50 1.74 4.50 1 - 104502Avg
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.txt
  • Loop Design/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 4.03 4.83 4.82 4.52 5.33 4.63 4.50 4.58 5.00 4.21 B.2.1.8.2.12W Analog Loop Design/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 10.00 8.00 11.41 6.50 10.61 7.00 11.32 6.00 11.16 5.67 1,2,3,4,5 B.2.1.9.1.12W Analog Loop Non-Design/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 4.01 3.64 4.81 3.73 5.31 4.29 4.54 3.75 5.01 3.76 B.2.1.9.1.42W Analog Loop Non-Design/<10 circuits/Dispatch In/FL (days) 1.61 3.33 1.53 3.11 1.59 3.64 1.52 3.50 1.89 4.22 4,5 B.2.1.9.2.12W Analog Loop Non-Design/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 9.03 4.55 9.89 6.14 10.18 8.08 11.42 7.92 11.33 5.90 B.2.1.11.1.42W Analog Loop w/INP Non- Design/<10 circuits/Dispatch In/FL (days) 1.61 1.53 1.59 4.00 1.52 1.89 3 B - 25 Metric Metric Name [SQM Number] May June July August September Number and Disaggregation BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-35A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-35A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-35A1.txt
  • Channel 283A for proposed Channel 264A at Doolittle, Missouri, in MM Docket 90-173. Klautzer counterproposed the allotment of Channel 253A to Lincoln, Missouri, as that community's first local service. 4. The Report and Order (``R&O''), 7 FCC Rcd 3015 (Allocations Br. 1992), in this proceeding dismissed the counterproposals filed by Twenty-One Sound and Klautzer for failure to comply with Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules. This section requires that the original of any document filed with the Commission by a party not represented by counsel be signed and verified by the party and his or her address stated. Since both Twenty-One Sound and Klautzer had failed to include affidavits verifying that the statements contained in their counterproposals were accurate to the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-63A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-63A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-63A1.txt
  • % Out of Service > 24 Hours 23.1 NA 20 NA 44.44 NA 28 NA 8.33 NA MR-5 - Repeat Trouble Reports MR-5-01-3343 % Repeat Reports within 30 Days 30.8 NA 45.45 NA 33.33 NA 61.54 NA 33.33 NA Special Services - Maintenance MR-2 - Trouble Report Rate MR-2-01-3200 Network Trouble Report Rate 0.29 1.55 0.29 3.31 0.2 0.93 0.27 1.52 0.23 1.49 MR-2-05-3200 % CPE/TOK/FOK Trouble Report Rate 0.44 1.55 0.34 2.26 0.24 1.24 0.33 3.03 0.33 1.34 MR-4 - Trouble Duration Intervals MR-4-01-3200 Mean Time To Repair - Total 5.5 10.35 5.39 5.77 5.44 6.64 5.04 6.75 4.99 5.95 3 MR-4-04-3200 % Cleared (all troubles) within 24 Hours 98.2 90 100 100 99.1 100 98.64 100 100 100 3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-136A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-136A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-136A1.txt
  • � 1.22 1.12 0.46 0.79 1.60 CPST $18.00 $17.23 $22.08 $17.89 $10.34 Standard error 1.77 1.91 0.65 1.10 2.33 Programming total $34.37 $34.28 $34.41 $34.48 $24.69 Standard error 1.29 1.32 0.54 0.60 1.35 Equipment $3.24 $2.77 $4.07 $2.08 $0.79 Standard error 0.33 0.35 0.18 0.24 0.42 Programming & equipment $37.61 $37.05 $38.48 $36.56 $25.48 Standard error 1.45 1.59 0.62 0.70 1.52 Channels 60.9 53.9 67.6 53.4 50.4 Standard error 2.7 3.2 1.0 1.8 3.6 Rate per channel $0.646 $0.776 $0.577 $0.762 $0.528 Standard error 0.034 0.043 0.011 0.033 0.036 Satellite channels 46.4 42.2 51.1 41.5 39.5 Standard error 2.3 2.6 0.9 1.5 3.2 Rate per satellite channel $0.864 $1.105 $0.771 $1.010 $0.679 Standard error 0.052 0.114 0.017 0.052 0.047 July 2001
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-154A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-154A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-154A1.txt
  • Part 25 of this Chapter, the application must be filed electronically through the International Bureau Filing System (IBFS). Applications for other earth station applications are permitted but not required to be filed electronically. Any party choosing to file an earth station application electronically must file in accordance with the pleading limitations, periods and other applicable provisions of �� 1.41 through 1.52 of this chapter; * * * * * 6. Amend � 25.117 by revising paragraphs (a), (b), and (c), and removing paragraph (e), to read as follows: �25.117 Modification of station license. (a) Except as provided for in � 25.118 (Modifications not requiring prior authorization), no modification of a radio station governed by this part which affects the parameters or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-154A1_Erratum.doc
  • Part 25 of this Chapter, the application must be filed electronically through the International Bureau Filing System (IBFS). Applications for other earth station applications are permitted but not required to be filed electronically. Any party choosing to file an earth station application electronically must file in accordance with the pleading limitations, periods and other applicable provisions of �� 1.41 through 1.52 of this chapter; * * * * * 6. Amend � 25.117 by revising paragraphs (a), (b), and (c), and removing paragraph (e), to read as follows: �25.117 Modification of station license. (a) Except as provided for in � 25.118 (Modifications not requiring prior authorization), no modification of a radio station governed by this part which affects the parameters or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-182A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-182A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-182A1.txt
  • 4-5. Id. See Sagir I MO&O, 16 FCC Rcd. at 8161-62 � 4. Although we find these arguments repetitive and deny them on the merits for the reasons previously stated by the Bureau, we note that further administrative filings and/or proceedings attempting to call into question the validity of Sagir's 1995 alternative CGSA grant could be deemed frivolous under Section 1.52 of the rules given our rejection of these arguments both here and in the Sagir I MO&O. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.52; see also Commission Taking Tough Measures against Frivolous Pleadings, Public Notice, 11 FCC Rcd 3030 (1996). The Commission first, and Division second, left no doubt that such arguments had been specifically rejected, and given our decision here, there
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-201A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-201A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-201A1.txt
  • a condition of receipt requires greater financial accountability from applicants, thus serving the public interest objectives of 47 U.S.C. � 309(j)). In Closed Broadcast Auction No. 25, for example, only 14 petitions to deny or informal objections were filed against the 94 long-form applications filed by winning bidders. Our Rules prohibit filing frivolous petitions to deny. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.52. Further, it is Commission policy to investigate legitimate claims of abuse of process, and to take appropriate enforcement action when warranted. See, e.g., Public Notice, ``Commission Takes Tough Measures Against Frivolous Pleadings,'' 11 FCC Rcd 3030 (1996). See also ConQuest Operator Services Corp., 14 FCC Rcd 12518, 12523-24 and n.32 (1999) (parties ``are under the obligation to be truthful and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-114A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-114A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-114A1.txt
  • the petition until December 11, 1997, more than one month after filing the petition with the Commission. We find that GGPR has not offered any compelling reason to justify this delay between the filing of the petition and its service on SFUSD. Further, SFUSD contends, and we agree, that the petition did not comply with the verification requirements of Section 1.52 of the Commission's rules. However, in light of our decision to accept the GGPR pleading as an informal objection, we decline to dismiss it for failure to comply with the requirements of Sections 1.47 and 1.52. 6. The GGPR Reply. In its February 17, 1998, reply, GGPR raises two arguments for the first time: (1) that SFUSD lacked a designated
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-154A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-154A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-154A1.txt
  • for Channel 229A at Warsaw, Missouri. In response to a Notice of Proposed Rule Making, Twenty-One Sound counter proposed the upgrade of its Station KNSX(FM), Steelville, Missouri, from Channel 227C2 to Channel 227C1. The staff Report and Order dismissed Twenty-One Sound's counterproposal and granted the upgrade for Station KRMS-FM. Twenty-One Sound's counterproposal was dismissed for failure to comply with Section 1.52 of the rules, which requires that the original of any document filed with the Commission by a party not represented by counsel be signed and verified by the party and his or her address stated. Specifically, Twenty-One Sound had failed to include either a notarized affidavit or an unsworn verification that the statements contained in its counterproposal were accurate to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-92A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-92A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-92A1.txt
  • the extent that form is available. If Form 312EZ is not available, such earth station license applicants must file on FCC Form 312, Main Form and Schedule B, and include the information specified in Section 25.130. (3) Applications for earth station authorizations must be filed in accordance with the pleading limitations, periods and other applicable provisions of �� 1.41 through 1.52 of this chapter, except that such earth station applications must be filed electronically through the International Bureau Filing System (IBFS) in accordance with the applicable provisions of Part 1, Subpart Y of this Chapter; 6. Amend � 25.116 by revising paragraph (e) to read as follows: � 25.116 Amendments to applications. * * * * * (e) Any amendment to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-125A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-125A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-125A1.txt
  • D. Wyatt, Associate Chief, CIB, to David Walker, Direct Dial, Direct Dial Audio Corp. v. SBC, et al., IC-01-N50387 (Mar. 21, 2002) (notifying Direct Dial that its informal complaint was closed after response from the carriers). EB previously urged Direct Dial not to submit frivolous pleadings to the Commission. Direct Dial Complaint Order, at 2 n.11, citing 47 C.F.R. � 1.52 and Public Notice, 11 FCC Rcd 3030 (1996). EB also noted that the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan earlier found Direct Dial's filings related to the matters raised here to be so frivolous as to violate Fed. R. Civ. P. 11. See Direct Dial Complaint Order, at 2. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-63A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-63A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-63A1.txt
  • for opposition to petitions to deny an application filed pursuant to � 25.220 of this chapter, oppositions to petitions to deny an application or responses to comments and informal objections regarding an application may be filed within 10 days after the petition, comment, or objection is filed and must be in accordance with other applicable provisions of �� 1.41 through 1.52 of this chapter, except that such oppositions must be filed electronically through the International Bureau Filing System (IBFS) in accordance with the applicable provisions of Part 1, Subpart Y of this Chapter. (d) Except for opposition to petitions to deny an application filed pursuant to � 25.220 of this chapter, reply comments by the party that filed the original petition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-63A1_Erratum.doc
  • for opposition to petitions to deny an application filed pursuant to � 25.220 of this chapter, oppositions to petitions to deny an application or responses to comments and informal objections regarding an application may be filed within 10 days after the petition, comment, or objection is filed and must be in accordance with other applicable provisions of �� 1.41 through 1.52 of this chapter, except that such oppositions must be filed electronically through the International Bureau Filing System (IBFS) in accordance with the applicable provisions of Part 1, Subpart Y of this Chapter. (d) Except for opposition to petitions to deny an application filed pursuant to � 25.220 of this chapter, reply comments by the party that filed the original petition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-163A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-163A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-163A1.txt
  • H. Dortch Secretary APPENDIX A Rule Changes Part 1 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended to read as follows: 1. Section 1.401 is amended by revising paragraphs (b) and (d) to read as follows: � 1.401 Petitions for rule making. ***** (b) The petition for rule making shall conform to the requirements of �� 1.49, 1.52, and 1.419(b) (or � 1.420(e), if applicable), and shall be submitted or addressed to the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 20554, or may be submitted electronically. ***** (d) . . . Petitions to amend the FM Table of Allotments must be accompanied by the appropriate construction permit application and payment of the appropriate application filing fee. 2. Section 1.420
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-178A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-178A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-178A1.txt
  • subscribers listening to XM or Sirius programming in their automobile must also obtain a receiver and have it installed. XM and Sirius often subsidize the price of the receiver and the price of installation. C3SR, Sidak Decl. at 55. We find unpersuasive Sidak's estimated own-price elasticity of demand. While Sidak estimates a ``critical'' own-price elasticity of demand for SDARS of -1.52 using current operating margins of 65 percent and an assumption of constant own-price elasticity of demand. Sidak then explains why the ``actual'' own-price elasticity of demand is less than -1.52 (in absolute terms) using information from XM's price increase from $9.95 to $12.95, churn rates, conversion rates, and marquee content (specifically, indecent content). Sidak concludes that this is evidence that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-222A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-222A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-222A1.txt
  • Rcd 6507, 6511 n.2 (MMB 1988). See File Nos. BNPED-20000214ABC and BPNED-20000307AAA. See 47 C.F.R. �1.420(a) (establishing procedures for the ``FM Table of Allotments'') and 47 C.F.R. �73.202(a) (limiting the FM Table of Allotments to non-reserved channels 221-300). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.401(e). In addition to the identified technical defects, Czelada did not verify his counterproposal as required by Section 1.52 of the rules. He also failed to include an engineering study or make the requisite commitment to apply for and construct the proposed NCE facility. See 47 C.F.R. �1.420(h) Note 1. See 47 C.F.R �1.115(c). See also Bear Lake and Honor, Michigan, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 8799 (1999). See FM Allocation Rules of Part 73, Subpart B,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-56A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-56A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-56A1.txt
  • of part 1 is amended to read as follows: Authority: 15 U.S.C. 79 et seq.; 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(j), 160, 201, 225, and 303. 2. Section 1.49 is amended by adding paragraph (f)(1)(iv) to read as follows: � 1.49 Specifications as to pleadings and documents. (f)(1) (iv) Petition for forbearance proceedings. Subpart A [Amended] 3. Add undesignated center heading below �1.52 to read as follows: Forbearance Proceedings 4. Add new ��1.54 through 1.59 as follows: � 1.54 Petitions for forbearance must be complete as filed. (a) Description of relief sought. Petitions for forbearance must identify the requested relief, including: (1) Each statutory provision, rule, or requirement from which forbearance is sought. (2) Each carrier, or group of carriers, for which forbearance
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-63A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-63A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-63A1.txt
  • 20 FCC Rcd at 690, � 33. ESV Order, 20 FCC Rcd at 690, � 33. MTN Petition at 4 & Attachment. See MTN Petition at 4-5. See MTN Petition at 4-5. MTN Petition at 4. MTN Petition at 4. See Intelsat Opposition at 23-24. FWCC Opposition at 3. FWCC Opposition at 3 & n.7 (citing 47 C.F.R. �� 1.17, 1.52). MTN Reply at 3. See MTN Petition at 3-4. See the International Bureau Provides Guidance Concerning the Notice Requirement for C-band Coordination by Earth Stations on Vessels, Public Notice, DA 05-1671, 20 FCC Rcd 10748 (2005). ESV Order, 20 FCC Rcd at 691-692, � 39. Full-band, full-arc is defined as the entire 1000 megahertz of C-band spectrum, 500 MHz of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-63A1_Rcd.pdf
  • to ESV operations taking place outside of the coordination agreement. These matters, however, would be handled by the frequency coordinator, or the 107See MTN Petition at 4-5. 108See MTN Petition at 4-5. 109MTN Petition at 4. 110MTN Petition at 4. 111See Intelsat Opposition at 23-24. 112FWCC Opposition at 3. 113FWCC Opposition at 3 & n.7 (citing 47 C.F.R. �� 1.17, 1.52). 114MTN Reply at 3. 10386 Federal Communications Commission FCC 09-63 Commission, through ordinary complaint procedures, not in response to the Public Notice requirement in Section 25.221(a)(11). Accordingly, we decline to require FS operators to make any specific demonstrations. 44.Thus, when the FS operator informs the Commission that it has been omitted from the coordination, along with specifying the relevant frequencies
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-150A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-150A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-150A1.txt
  • Petitioners Monte Nido Opposition at 1. This is not correct. The petition filed by James A. Kay, Jr., on October 27, 2003 did not expressly or implicitly reference TSB-88. We remind counsel that an attorney may be subjected to appropriate disciplinary action pursuant to Section 1.24 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.24, for a willful violation of Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.52, which provides that an attorney's signature on a pleading constitutes a certificate by him that there is good ground to support it, to the best of his knowledge, information, and belief. See Glendale Order, 24 FCC Rcd at 4091 n.23. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 10-150 Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-150A1_Rcd.pdf
  • Petitioners Monte Nido Opposition at 1. This is not correct. The petition filed by James A. Kay, Jr., on October 27, 2003 did not expressly or implicitly reference TSB-88. We remind counsel that an attorney may be subjected to appropriate disciplinary action pursuant to Section 1.24 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.24, for a willful violation of Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.52, which provides that an attorney's signature on a pleading constitutes acertificate by him that there is good ground to support it, to the best of his knowledge, information, and belief. SeeGlendale Order, 24 FCC Rcd at 4091 n.23. 11388 Federal Communications Commission FCC 10-150 IV. CONCLUSION 13. Petitioners have not demonstrated that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-197A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-197A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-197A1.txt
  • of the problem and take whatever action is deemed appropriate. � 5.95 Informal objections. A person or entity desiring to object to or to oppose an Experimental Radio application for a station license or authorization may file an informal objection against that application. The informal objection and any responsive pleadings shall comply with the requirements set forth in ��1.41 through 1.52 of this chapter. Subpart C-Technical Standards and Operating Requirements � 5.101 Frequency stability. h an input voltage variation of 85% to 115% of rated input voltage, unless justification is presented to demonstrate otherwise. � 5.103 Types of emission. Stations in the Experimental Radio Service may be authorized to use any of the classifications of emissions covered in part 2 of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-21A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-21A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-21A1.txt
  • in the 11.7-12.2 GHz and 14.0-14.5 GHz bands; and (ii) The earth station will meet all the applicable technical specifications set forth in part 25 of this chapter. (iii) The earth station is not an ESV. (3) Applications for earth station authorizations must be filed in accordance with the pleading limitations, periods and other applicable provisions of �� 1.41 through 1.52 of this chapter, except that such earth station applications must be filed electronically through the International Bureau Filing System (IBFS) in accordance with the applicable provisions of part 1, subpart Y of this chapter; * * * * * 8. In � 25.116, revise paragraph (e) to read as follows: �25.116 Amendments to applications. * * * * * (e)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-21A1_Rcd.pdf
  • 14.0-14.5 GHz bands; and (ii) The earth station will meet all the applicable technical specifications set forth in part 25 1558 Federal Communications Commission FCC 10-21 of this chapter. (iii) The earth station is not an ESV. (3) Applications for earthstation authorizations must be filed in accordance with the pleading limitations, periods and other applicable provisions of �� 1.41 through 1.52 of this chapter, except that such earth station applications must be filed electronically through the International Bureau Filing System (IBFS) in accordance with the applicable provisions of part 1, subpart Y of this chapter; * * * * * 8. In � 25.116, revise paragraph (e) to read as follows: �25.116 Amendments to applications. * * * * * (e)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-32A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-32A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-32A1.txt
  • which petitioner believes to be erroneous, and shall state with particularity the respects in which he believes such findings and/or conclusions should be changed. The petition may request that additional findings of fact and/or conclusions of law be made. * * * * (i) Petitions for reconsideration, oppositions, and replies shall conform to the requirements of �� 1.49, 1.51, and 1.52 and shall be submitted to the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, D.C., 20554, by mail, by commercial courier, by hand, or by electronic submission through the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System or other electronic filing system (such as ULS). Petitions submitted by electronic mail and petitions submitted directly to staff without submission to the Secretary shall not be considered to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-53A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-53A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-53A1.txt
  • actual length, excluding heliports. (2) 50 to 1 for a horizontal distance of 3.05 kilometers (10,000 feet) from the nearest point of the nearest runway of each airport specified in paragraph (d) of this section with its longest runway no more than 0.98 kilometers (3,200 feet) in actual length, excluding heliports. (3) 25 to 1 for a horizontal distance of 1.52 kilometers (5,000 feet) from the nearest point of the nearest landing and takeoff area of each heliport specified in paragraph (d) of this section. (c) When requested by the FAA, any construction or alteration that would be in an instrument approach area (defined in the FAA standards governing instrument approach procedures) and available information indicates it might exceed an obstruction
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-116A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-116A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-116A1.txt
  • petition for reconsideration was properly dismissed in 2005 as untimely filed. Moreover, as discussed above, Havens' allegations about other AMTS licensees - even if true - provide no basis for reconsidering the decisions to dismiss Havens' own AMTS applications in this proceeding. We therefore find that Havens' pleadings filed subsequent to our 2008 MO&O are frivolous, in violation of rule 1.52, because they are ``based on arguments that have been specifically rejected by the Commission'' or otherwise have ``no plausible basis for relief.'' We gave Havens clear notice in the 2010 Order on Reconsideration that the staff would summarily dismiss subsequent pleadings with respect to the above-captioned applications. Yet, Havens continues to file repetitious petitions for reconsideration. Responding to each subsequent
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-116A1_Rcd.pdf
  • whether Havens' petition for reconsideration was properly dismissed in 2005 as untimely filed. Moreover, as discussed above, Havens' allegations about other AMTS licensees �even if true �provide no basis for reconsidering the decisions to dismiss Havens' own AMTS applications in this proceeding. We therefore find that Havens' pleadings filed subsequent to our 2008 MO&O are frivolous, in violation of rule 1.52,29because they are "based on arguments that have been specifically rejected by the Commission" or otherwise have "no plausible basis for relief."30 12. We gave Havens clear notice in the 2010 Order on Reconsideration that the staff would summarily dismiss subsequent pleadings with respect to the above-captioned applications.31Yet, Havens continues to file repetitious petitions for reconsideration. Responding to each subsequent petition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-152A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-152A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-152A1.txt
  • commercial use by Havens' commercial wireless businesses. While we will carefully examine any new facts that Skybridge may raise in future proceedings, we put Skybridge on notice that if it continues to make repetitious claims without a reasonable basis in fact or law, in light of our precedent and judicial decisions, it may be subject to enforcement action under Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules, which prohibits frivolous pleadings. Fee computation in FOIA No. 2011-241. We modify WTB's computation of the fee for processing the 241 Request. The fee consisted of $201.63 for search and review and $4.10 for copying 41 pages. Skybridge's contention that it did not seek copies of 37 pages of the documents released has no bearing on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-16A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-16A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-16A1.txt
  • petitioner believes to be erroneous, and shall state with particularity the respects in which he believes such findings and/or conclusions should be changed. The petition may request that additional findings of fact and/or conclusions of law be made. * * * * * (i) Petitions for reconsideration, oppositions, and replies shall conform to the requirements of �� 1.49, 1.51, and 1.52 and shall be submitted to the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, D.C., 20554, by mail, by commercial courier, by hand, or by electronic submission through the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System or other electronic filing system (such as ULS). Petitions submitted only by electronic mail and petitions submitted directly to staff without submission to the Secretary shall not be considered
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-67A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-67A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-67A1.txt
  • Application in a petition to deny prior to July 28, 2010, the Commission's Rules permit the filing of informal objections at any time. We will treat the portions of the Opposition that address the MBMC Application as an informal objection and address them herein. In addition, we decline to dismiss the Opposition because it allegedly did not comply with Section 1.52 of the Rules. As noted, we are treating those portions of the Opposition that address the MBMC Application as an informal objection. The Opposition satisfies our requirements for informal objections. Moreover, as discussed further below, we find the Petition moot and do not address the arguments made therein. Accordingly, we need not address whether those portions of the Opposition responsive
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-73A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-73A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-73A1.txt
  • Rcd 6119, 6123, � 13 (2002); Conflicts between Applications and Petitions to Amend the FM Table of Allotments, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 8 FCC Rcd 4743, 4744 (1993) (footnote omitted); and Amendment of Sections 1.420 and 73.3584 Concerning Abuses of the Commission's Processes, Report and Order, 5 FCC Rcd 3910, 3919 n.41 (1990) (establishing a strict policy of enforcing Section 1.52 verification requirements). Springdale, Arkansas, 4 FCC Rcd at 677 n.7; and Eldorado and Lawton, Oklahoma, Report and Order, 5 FCC Rcd 6737 (MMB 1990). Compare Detroit, Texas, 13 FCC Rcd at 15592, � 6 (rejecting late-filed curative amendment to counterproposal), and Eldorado, and Lawton, Oklahoma, Report and Order, 5 FCC Rcd at 6737 (rejecting counterproposal that was not substantially complete
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-26A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-26A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-26A1.txt
  • of an agency's ability to manage its proceedings and execute its functions is the ability to impose sanctions to ``protect the integrity of its own processes.'' Section 558(b) does not apply to such sanctions designed to protect the integrity of an agency's internal processes, but only to those designed to modify regulated entities' ``primary conduct.'' Havens further contends that section 1.52 of the Commission's rules does not support the proposed sanction in this case because the rule imposes standards of conduct only on attorneys, not pro se applicants such as Havens. We need not - and do not - decide the reach of section 1.52 in this proceeding. As discussed above, we have authority under the Act, as well as under
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.txt
  • for all pre-order functions reported, we rely on data starting in August because, as discussed below, Bell Atlantic made changes in the way that it calculates response times in August that more accurately capture response times experienced by competing carriers. For EDI unparsed CSR retrieval, Bell Atlantic failed to meet the standard by .95 of a second in August and 1.52 seconds in September. For EDI due date availability, Bell Atlantic met the standard each month. For EDI address validation, Bell Atlantic met the standard in August and deviated by 1.87 seconds in September. For EDI product and service availability, Bell Atlantic met the standard in August and deviated by .16 of a second in September. See Bell Atlantic Dowell/Canny Decl.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fcc97303.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fcc97303.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fcc97303.wp
  • record of all possible exposure locations is not necessary, but, for example, the "worst case" exposure value in an accessible area could be mentioned as showing that no exposures would ever be greater than that level. Reference should be given to the actual FCC exposure limit or limits relevant for the particular transmitting site. 206See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.17 and 1.52. 62 Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-303 (3) An explanation as to what, if any, restrictions on access to certain areas will be maintained to ensure compliance with the public or occupational exposure limits. This includes control procedures that are established for workers who may be exposed as a result of maintenance or other tasks related to their jobs. (4) A
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1999/fcc99051.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1999/fcc99051.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1999/fcc99051.wp
  • ITC-214-19981118-00820 and ITC-214-19980930-00689, Order, Authorization and Certificate, DA 98-2654 (rel. Jan. 4, 1999). 37 Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-51 that petitions to deny applications for international Section 214 authorizations are often filed based on arguments that have been specifically rejected by the Commission with the apparent intent of removing the application from streamlined review. Cable & Wireless recognizes that Section 1.52 of the Commission's rules addresses frivolous pleadings filed in Commission proceedings and provides that the Commission can strike such pleadings, issue forfeitures, or seek disciplinary action against the attorneys involved. The Commission issued a public notice in February 1996 reminding parties of Section 1.52 and stating that the Commission intends to fully utilize its authority to discourage and deter frivolous
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1998/fcc98056.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1998/fcc98056.wp
  • the public has had experience with the ECFS system, we anticipate adding other types of pleadings and documents to the electronic filing system and moving toward an all- electronic filing system. K In the Notice, we observed that if we extended the ECFS to proceedings other than rulemaking proceedings, we might have to amend the signature rule, 47 C.F.R. � 1.52, which requires that "[t]he original of all petitions, motions, pleadings, briefs, and other documents filed" FCC 98-56 Federal Communications Commission 30 12 FCC Rcd at 5154 n.15, citing 47 C.F.R. � 1.52. 31 See 47 C.F.R. � 1.429(h). 32 PCIA Comments at 3. 33 Bell Atlantic/NYNEX Comments at 4; Ameritech Comments at 2. We address security concerns infra at ��
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Comments/fcc98055/210020-2.pdf
  • they engage in such abuse. CEMA therefore urges the Commission to establish a standing requirement for complaints under Section 255, in order to preserve the integrity of the complaint process, Additionally, CEMA encourages the Commission to impose sanctions on parties who file frivolous Section 255 complaints before the Commission or its staff.37 A pleading may be deemed frivolous under Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. $ 1.52, if there is no "good ground to support it' or if it is "interposed for delay."`*Without a standing requirement, there are no safeguards against the filing of frivolous complaints under Section 255. B. The Commission Should Establish A Time Limit For The Filing Of A Complaint Under Section 255. In the NPRM,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.wp
  • requirement). 1.49 Specifications as to pleadings and documents (change to 1.49 allow electronic filing of pleadings and other documents via ULS and to delete microfiche requirements). 1.50 Specifications as to briefs (add specifications for briefs 1.50 filed via ULS). 1.51 Number of copies of pleadings, briefs, and other papers 1.51(f) (eliminate provision requiring extra copies for pleadings filed via ULS). 1.52 Subscription and verification (change to allow electronic 1.52 versions of pleadings and other documents via ULS to be acceptable for filing). 1.83(b) Applications for radio operator licenses (change 1.83(b) organizational name from Private Radio Bureau to Licensing and Technical Analysis Branch, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division). 1.85 Suspensions of operator licenses (change organizational 1.85 name from Private Radio Bureau
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/da980572.pdf
  • or manual filers applying for multiple licenses are not required to submit a separate application for each market if all filing requirements associated with the application are identical except for the market designator, channel block, and market name. Under these circumstances, applicants may submit one FCC Form 601 Main Form and Schedule B. Frivolous Pleadings Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.52, the Commission reminds parties to our proceedings and their attorneys that the Commission intends to fully use its authority to discourage and deter the filing of frivolous pleadings. See Public Notice, "Commission Taking Tough Measures Against Frivolous Pleadings," FCC 96-42 (rel. Feb. 9, 1996). D-2 Organization of Application Main Form The FCC Form 601 Main Form should be completed in
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
  • 22.4 18.93 14.17 17.67 17.8 Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-118 C-32 Metric Metric September October November December January Notes Number Full Name VZ CLE C VZ CLE C VZ CLE C VZ CLE C VZ CLE C 2-Wire Digital Services - Maintenance MR-2 � Trouble Report Rate MR-2-02- 3341 Network Trouble Report Rate - Loop 0.3 1.33 0.31 1.45 0.79 1.52 0.9 0.62 0.83 0.97 MR-2-03- 3341 Network Trouble Report Rate - Central Office 0.17 0.26 0.14 0.47 0.09 0.1 0.08 0.23 0.09 0.29 MR-2-04- 3341 % Subsequent Reports 27.41 26.09 27.72 14.29 15.19 11.11 17.5 20 MR-3 � Missed Repair Appointments MR-3-01- 3341 % Missed Repair Appointment � Loop 35.83 10.53 41.97 15.25 8.68 3.33 9.71 0 8.55 5.41 MR-3-02-
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-3442A1.html
  • of frivolousness, and the Commission, like federal courts, forbids such improper submissions.11 Consequently, we urge DDA and its counsel to act in accordance with this prohibition in the future.7. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED th at, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i), 154(j), 208, and sections 1.52, 1.115(d), and 1.711-1.736 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.52, 1.115(d), 1.711-1.736, and authority delegated by sections 0.111, and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, the filings of DDA referenced herein ARE DISMISSED, and the proceeding is TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Radhika V. Karmarkar Deputy Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 1 For administrative convenience,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1889A1.html
  • 9 Id. 10 FCC 05M-13 (rel. Mar. 17, 2005). 11 See.Judge's Ex. 2. 12 Id. at 1-2. 13 Id. at 4. 14 See Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 05M-16 (rel. Mar. 30, 2005) (``MO&O''). 15 Specifically, the MO&O concluded that the Show Cause Reply and its submission to the Presiding Judge were in violation of sections 0.401, 1.7, 1.47, 1.51(a)(1), 1.52, 1.209, 1.211, 1.291(a)(4), and 1.296 of the Commission's Rules. Id. at 2, 4. 16 Id. 17 Id. at 2, 5. 18 Id. at 2, n.2. 19 Id. at 3. 20 See Judge's Ex. 3. 21 Id. at 1. As noted above, the Media Bureau canceled the license for Station K216EQ on May 9, 2005. 22 See Dismissal Order, note 4
• http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-1585A1.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-1585A1.pdf
  • A minimum distance separation of 165 kilometers is required in this instance. However, if Station WKQL(FM) is reclassified to operate as a Class C0 facility, the short spacing issue will be eliminated. The petition was signed by Clyde Scott, Jr., President, but not verified. In response to the Notice, Petitioner's comments included his signed sworn statement as required by Section 1.52 of the rules. See 1998 Biennial Regulatory Review-Streamlining of Radio Technical Rules in Parts 73 and 74 of the Commission's Rules, 15 FCC Rcd 21,649 (2000). See 47 C.F.R. �� 73.3573, n. 4 and 1.420(g), n.2. See also Second Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 21,662, � 26. See In Re Reclassification of License of Station WKQL(FM), Jacksonville, Florida,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-342A1.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-342A1.pdf
  • between these proposals is 11.6 kilometers. See Santa Isabel, PR and Christiansted, VI, 3 FCC Rcd 2336 (1988), aff'd. sub nom. Amor Family Broadcasting v. FCC, 918 F.2d 960 (D.C. Cir. 1990). Although BK Radio (``BK'') submitted an expression of interest in the proposed Butler allotment, its comments were unacceptable and not considered because BK did not comply with Section 1.52 of the Commission's rules. This rule requires that all pleadings filed by parties not represented by legal counsel be signed and verified by the petitioner and provide the petitioner's mailing address. While BK's comments were signed by a partner and an address was provided, no verification statement was supplied. BK did not file a petition for reconsideration of the dismissal
• http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1956A1.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1956A1.pdf
  • pleadings, SHU offers a solution that will accommodate both SHU and Monroe. SHU states that Sepulveda, the original rulemaking petitioner in this proceeding, has failed to file an acceptable expression of interest for its proposal to allot an FM channel at Water Mill because none of Sepulveda's filings were verified. SHU points out that the Commission has strictly enforced Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules'') in FM allotment proceedings because of the potential for abuse and has not permitted this defect to be cured if it would prejudice other mutually exclusive proposals. Thus, SHU contends that the allotment at Water Mill should be reversed, thereby eliminating the need to make a choice between Channels 277A or 233A at Water
• http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-06-163A1.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-06-163A1.pdf
  • H. Dortch Secretary APPENDIX A Rule Changes Part 1 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended to read as follows: 1. Section 1.401 is amended by revising paragraphs (b) and (d) to read as follows: � 1.401 Petitions for rule making. ***** (b) The petition for rule making shall conform to the requirements of �� 1.49, 1.52, and 1.419(b) (or � 1.420(e), if applicable), and shall be submitted or addressed to the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 20554, or may be submitted electronically. ***** (d) . . . Petitions to amend the FM Table of Allotments must be accompanied by the appropriate construction permit application and payment of the appropriate application filing fee. 2. Section 1.420
• http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-08-222A1.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-08-222A1.pdf
  • Rcd 6507, 6511 n.2 (MMB 1988). See File Nos. BNPED-20000214ABC and BPNED-20000307AAA. See 47 C.F.R. �1.420(a) (establishing procedures for the ``FM Table of Allotments'') and 47 C.F.R. �73.202(a) (limiting the FM Table of Allotments to non-reserved channels 221-300). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.401(e). In addition to the identified technical defects, Czelada did not verify his counterproposal as required by Section 1.52 of the rules. He also failed to include an engineering study or make the requisite commitment to apply for and construct the proposed NCE facility. See 47 C.F.R. �1.420(h) Note 1. See 47 C.F.R �1.115(c). See also Bear Lake and Honor, Michigan, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 8799 (1999). See FM Allocation Rules of Part 73, Subpart B,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-11-73A1.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-11-73A1.pdf
  • Rcd 6119, 6123, � 13 (2002); Conflicts between Applications and Petitions to Amend the FM Table of Allotments, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 8 FCC Rcd 4743, 4744 (1993) (footnote omitted); and Amendment of Sections 1.420 and 73.3584 Concerning Abuses of the Commission's Processes, Report and Order, 5 FCC Rcd 3910, 3919 n.41 (1990) (establishing a strict policy of enforcing Section 1.52 verification requirements). Springdale, Arkansas, 4 FCC Rcd at 677 n.7; and Eldorado and Lawton, Oklahoma, Report and Order, 5 FCC Rcd 6737 (MMB 1990). Compare Detroit, Texas, 13 FCC Rcd at 15592, � 6 (rejecting late-filed curative amendment to counterproposal), and Eldorado, and Lawton, Oklahoma, Report and Order, 5 FCC Rcd at 6737 (rejecting counterproposal that was not substantially complete
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/materials/already-released/consumer090002.pdf
  • CHR/NR 9 0.14 Classic AOR(CL AOR) 151 2.76 CHR/U 56 0.89 Ethnic (E) 16 0.29 CL 70 1.11 Easy Listening (EZ) 2 0.04 CL AOR 284 4.5 EZ/New Age Contemp. (NAC) 1 0.02 CL HITS 83 1.31 EZ/SAC 3 0.05 E 14 0.22 FS 202 3.69 EZ 13 0.21 FS/T 41 0.75 EZ/SAC 1 0.02 G 55 1 FS 96 1.52 G/B 1 0.02 FS/T 81 1.28 Jazz (J) 59 1.08 G 62 0.98 News (N) 37 0.68 J 118 1.87 News/Talk (N/T) 161 2.94 KIDS 1 0.02 NAC/AOR 2 0.04 N 75 1.19 O 352 6.43 N/T 170 2.69 Religious (REL) 200 3.65 O 394 6.24 Soft Adult Contemp. (SAC) 379 6.92 REL 276 4.37 SP 172 3.14 SAC 253
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/napoli-stmt.pdf
  • with the relationship between market conditions and public affairs programming, and involves an analysis of the broadcast schedules for 111 commercial television stations during a two week time period in January of 2000. As Table Four indicates, television stations owned locally aired an average of .85 hours of local public affairs programming during this two week time period, compared with 1.52 hours for stations not locally owned. These results approach, but do not achieve, accepted levels of statistical significance. 13 Table 4 Means Comparison: Local Public Affairs Programming (N = 111). Station Type Local Public Affairs Programming HoursS.D. N Local Owner 1.52 3.1136 Non-Local Owner .85 1.9775 Note: F = 1.902; p = .17 Table Five presents the results of a
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-c.pdf
  • 45.7 Sports 2.9 2.1 1.0 3.0 2.7 1.0 Talk 6.0 6.1 1.7 7.0 8.0 2.2 Talk/Classic AOR 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.0 Talk/Full Service 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Talk/Jazz 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 Unknown 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 34 Table 2 Per-Market Averages 1. All 244 Markets 1993 1997 Stations 21.39 24.55 Black-Targeted 1.52 1.93 Black-Owned 0.65 0.55 Hispanic-Targeted 0.68 1.07 Hispanic-Owned 0.19 0.28 AQH Listening 16.80 15.78 Formats 11.48 14.88 Owners 18.65 14.92 HHI 1269.83 2091.66 Population (000) 685.18 707.74 Black Population 84.32 Hispanic Population 69.54 2. 73 Markets with Black Listening Data in both Years 1993 1997 Stations 25.33 28.01 Black-Targeted 3.53 4.26 Black-Owned 1.60 1.36 Non-Black AQH Listening 16.71 15.67 Black
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/04/releases/frao3253.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/04/releases/frao3253.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/04/releases/frao3253.wp
  • for other forms of relief) and responsive pleadings for Commission consideration must comply with � 1.2108 and must: (1) Identify the application or applications (including applicant's name, station location, Commission file numbers and radio service involved) with which it is concerned; (2) Be filed in accordance with the pleading limitations, filing periods, and other applicable provisions of �� 1.41 through 1.52 except where otherwise provided in � 1.2108; (3) Contain specific allegations of fact which, except for facts of which official notice may be taken, shall be supported by affidavit of a person or persons with personal 138 knowledge thereof, and which shall be sufficient to demonstrate that the petitioner (or respondent) is a party in interest and that a grant
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/da960716.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/da960716.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/da960716.wp
  • I) that it has a confidentiality request on file. Because the required information bears on an applicant's qualifications, the Commission envisions that confidentiality requests will not be routinely granted. An applicant's request for confidentiality must include a demonstration that it would suffer substantial competitive harm from the public disclosure of the confidential information. Frivolous Pleadings Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.52, the Commission reminds parties to our proceedings and their attorneys that the Commission intends to fully utilize its authority to discourage and deter the filing of frivolous pleadings. See Public Notice, "Commission Taking Tough Measures Against Frivolous Pleadings," FCC 96-42 (rel. February 9, 1996). 9 ORGANIZATION OF EXHIBITS Main Form and Schedule Exhibits The FCC Form 600 Main Form should
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/07/releases/da960586.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/07/releases/da960586.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/07/releases/da960586.wp
  • the licensee coming into compliance with our requirements. Petitions to Deny Once FCC Form 600s are filed, the Commission will review the applications and issue a Public Notice announcing that those applications have been accepted for filing. This Public Notice will trigger the 30-day filing window for petitions to deny. All petitions to deny must comply with 47 C.F.R. � 1.52. Final Payment and Licensing Matters After resolving any petitions to deny, and if the Commission is otherwise satisfied that the applicant is qualified, the Commission will issue a Public Notice announcing its readiness to issue the MTA licenses, assuming that the applicant (except for small businesses making quarterly installment payments) makes full payment of its winning bid amount. See 47
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/10/releases/da961153.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/10/releases/da961153.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/10/releases/da961153.wp
  • I) that it has a confidentiality request on file. Because the required information bears on the applicant's qualifications, the Commission envisions that confidentiality requests will not be routinely granted. An applicant's request for confidentiality must include a demonstration that it would suffer substantial competitive harm from the public disclosure of the confidential information. Frivolous Pleadings Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.52, the Commission reminds parties to our proceedings and their attorneys that the Commission intends to fully utilize its authority to discourage and deter the filing of frivolous pleadings, including petitions to deny. See Public Notice, "Commission Taking Tough Measures Against Frivolous Pleadings," FCC 96-42 (rel. February 9, 1996). ORGANIZATION OF EXHIBITS Main Form and Schedule Exhibits The FCC Form 600
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/11/releases/bip_def.pdf
  • of relief) and responsive pleadings for Commission consideration must comply with � 1.2108 of this Chapter and must: (1) Identify the application or applications (including applicant's name, station location, Commission file numbers and radio service involved) with which it is concerned; (2) Be filed in accordance with the pleading limitations, filing periods, and other applicable provisions of �� 1.41 through 1.52 of this Chapter except where otherwise provided in � 1.2108 of this Chapter; 131 (3) Contain specific allegations of fact which, except objections filed, or other matters which may be officially for facts of which official notice may be taken, shall be noticed, the Commission finds that: supported by affidavit of a person or persons with (1) The application is
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/11/releases/da970081.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/11/releases/da970081.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/11/releases/da970081.wp
  • � 1.65. An applicant that fails to submit the required FCC Form 600 application by January 30, 1997, and fails to establish good cause for any late-filed submissions, shall be deemed to have defaulted and will be subject to the default payments set forth in Sections 1.2104 and 24.704 of the Commission's rules. Frivolous Pleadings Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.52, the Commission reminds parties to our proceedings and their attorneys that the Commission intends to fully utilize its authority to discourage and deter the filing of frivolous pleadings. See Public Notice, "Commission Taking Tough Measures Against Frivolous Pleadings," FCC 96-42 (rel. Feb. 9, 1996). Organization of Application and Exhibits Main Form and Schedule A The FCC Form 600 Main Form
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/12/releases/da970153.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/12/releases/da970153.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/12/releases/da970153.wp
  • of the Commission's Rules (47 C.F.R. � 0.459). Because the required information bears on the applicant's qualifications, the Commission envisions that confidentiality requests will not be routinely granted. An applicant's request for confidentiality must include a demonstration that it would suffer substantial competitive harm from the public disclosure of the confidential information. 6 Frivolous Pleadings. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.52, the Commission reminds parties to our proceedings and their attorneys that the Commission intends to fully utilize its authority to discourage and deter the filing of frivolous pleadings, including petitions to deny. See Public Notice, "Commission Taking Tough Measures Against Frivolous Pleadings," FCC 96-42 (rel. February 9, 1996). Organization of Application and Exhibits Main Form and Schedule Exhibits. The FCC
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/da970886.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/da970886.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/da970886.wp
  • application. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.65. An applicant that fails to submit the required FCC Form 600 application by May 12, 1997, and fails to establish good cause for any late-filed submissions, shall be deemed to have defaulted and will be subject to the default payments set forth in 47 C.F.R. � 27.203. Frivolous Pleadings Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.52, the Commission reminds parties to our proceedings and their attorneys that the Commission intends to fully utilize its authority to discourage and deter the filing of frivolous pleadings. See Public Notice, "Commission Taking Tough Measures Against Frivolous Pleadings," FCC 96-42 (rel. Feb. 9, 1996). D-7 Organization of Application and Exhibits Main Form and Schedule A The FCC Form 600 Main
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/fo9750.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/fo9750.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/fo9750.wp
  • (including petitions for other forms of relief) and responsive pleadings for Commission consideration must comply with section 27.207 and must: (1)Identify the application or applications (including applicant's name, station location, Commission file numbers and radio service involved) with which it is concerned; (2)Be filed in accordance with the pleading limitations, filing periods, and other applicable provisions of sections 1.41 through 1.52 of this chapter except where otherwise provided in section 27.207; (3)Contain specific allegations of fact which, except for facts of which official notice may be taken, shall be supported by affidavit of a person or persons with personal knowledge thereof, and which shall be sufficient to demonstrate that the petitioner (or respondent) is a party in interest and that a
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/wcsbip.pdf
  • radio service involved) with which it is officially notice, the Commission finds that the grant will concerned; serve the public interest, convenience, and necessity. See (2) Be filed in accordance with the pleading also section 1.2108 of this chapter. limitations, filing periods, and other applicable provisions (b) The grant shall be without a formal hearing if, of sections 1.41 through 1.52 of this chapter except upon consideration of the application, any pleadings or where otherwise provided in section 27.207; objections filed, or other matters which may be officially (3) Contain specific allegations of fact noticed, the Commission finds that: which, except for facts of which official notice may be (1) The application is acceptable for filing, taken, shall be supported by
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da972583.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da972583.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da972583.wp
  • or manual filers applying for multiple licenses are not required to submit a separate application for each market if all filing requirements associated with the application are identical except for the market designator, channel block, and market name. Under these circumstances, applicants may submit one FCC Form 601 Main Form and Schedule B. Frivolous Pleadings Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.52, the Commission reminds parties to our proceedings and their attorneys that the Commission intends to fully use its authority to discourage and deter the filing of frivolous pleadings. See Public Notice, "Commission Taking Tough Measures Against Frivolous Pleadings," FCC 96-42 (rel. Feb. 9, 1996). D-2 Organization of Application Main Form The FCC Form 601 Main Form should be completed in
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/d980572d.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/d980572d.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/d980572d.wp
  • or manual filers applying for multiple licenses are not required to submit a separate application for each market if all filing requirements associated with the application are identical except for the market designator, channel block, and market name. Under these circumstances, applicants may submit one FCC Form 601 Main Form and Schedule B. Frivolous Pleadings Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.52, the Commission reminds parties to our proceedings and their attorneys that the Commission intends to fully use its authority to discourage and deter the filing D-2 of frivolous pleadings. See Public Notice, "Commission Taking Tough Measures Against Frivolous Pleadings," FCC 96-42 (rel. Feb. 9, 1996). Organization of Application Main Form The FCC Form 601 Main Form should be completed in
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/da982143.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/da982143.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/da982143.wp
  • or manual filers applying for multiple licenses are not required to submit a separate application for each market if all filing requirements associated with the application are identical except for the market designator, channel block, and market name. Under these circumstances, applicants may submit one FCC Form 601 Main Form and Schedule B. Frivolous Pleadings Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.52, the Commission reminds parties to our proceedings and their attorneys that the Commission intends to fully use its authority to discourage and deter the filing of frivolous pleadings. See Public Notice, "Commission Taking Tough Measures Against Frivolous Pleadings," 11 FCC Rcd. 3030 (1996). D-2 Organization of Application Main Form The FCC Form 601 Main Form should be completed in its
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/19/releases/fc950319.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/19/releases/fc950319.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/19/releases/fc950319.wp
  • of relief) and responsive pleadings for Commission consideration must comply with � 1.2108 of this chapter and must: (1) Identify the application or applications (including applicant's name, station location, Commission file numbers and radio service involved) with which it is concerned; (2) Be filed in accordance with the pleading limitations, filing periods, and other applicable provisions of �� 1.41 through 1.52 of this chapter except where otherwise provided in � 1.2108 of this chapter; (3) Contain specific allegations of fact which, except for facts of which official notice may be taken, shall be supported by affidavit of a person or persons with personal knowledge thereof, and which shall be sufficient to demonstrate that the petitioner (or respondent) is a party in
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/da982542.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/da982542.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/da982542.wp
  • Filed Electronic or manual filers applying for multiple licenses are not required to submit a separate application for each market if all filing requirements associated with the application are identical except for the market designator and market name. Under these circumstances, applicants may submit one FCC Form 601 Main Form and Schedule B. Frivolous Pleadings Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.52, the Commission reminds parties to our proceedings and their attorneys that the Commission intends to fully use its authority to discourage and deter the filing of frivolous pleadings. See Public Notice, "Commission Taking Tough Measures Against Frivolous Pleadings," 11 FCC Rcd 3030 (1996). D-2 Organization of Application Main Form The FCC Form 601 Main Form should be completed in its
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/21/releases/da990405.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/21/releases/da990405.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/21/releases/da990405.wp
  • Forms To Be Filed Filers applying for multiple licenses are not required to submit a separate application for each market if all filing requirements associated with the application are identical except for the market designator and market name. Under these circumstances, applicants may submit one FCC Form 601 Main Form and Schedule B. Frivolous Pleadings Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.52, the Commission reminds parties to our proceedings and their attorneys that the Commission intends to fully use its authority to discourage and deter the filing of frivolous pleadings. See Public Notice, "Commission Taking Tough Measures Against Frivolous Pleadings," 11 FCC Rcd 3030 (1996). D-2 Organization of Application Main Form The FCC Form 601 Main Form should be completed in its
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/22/releases/d990757d.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/22/releases/d990757d.wp
  • Forms To Be Filed Filers applying for multiple licenses are not required to submit a separate application for each market if all filing requirements associated with the application are identical except for the market designator and market name. Under these circumstances, applicants may submit one FCC Form 601 Main Form and Schedule B. Frivolous Pleadings Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.52, the Commission reminds parties to our proceedings and their attorneys that the Commission intends to use its authority fully to discourage and deter the filing of frivolous pleadings. See Public Notice, "Commission Taking Tough Measures Against Frivolous Pleadings," 11 FCC Rcd 3030 (1996). D-2 Organization of Application Filing FCC Form 601 Electronically. Follow the instructions set forth in Attachment E
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/22/releases/e990757d.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/22/releases/e990757d.wp
  • Forms To Be Filed Filers applying for multiple licenses are not required to submit a separate application for each market if all filing requirements associated with the application are identical except for the market designator and market name. Under these circumstances, applicants may submit one FCC Form 601 Main Form and Schedule B. Frivolous Pleadings Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.52, the Commission reminds parties to our proceedings and their attorneys that the Commission intends to use its authority fully to discourage and deter the filing of frivolous pleadings. See Public Notice, "Commission Taking Tough Measures Against Frivolous Pleadings," 11 FCC Rcd 3030 (1996). D-2 Organization of Application Filing FCC Form 601 Electronically. Follow the instructions set forth in Attachment E
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/22/releases/pcsbipg.pdf
  • of relief) and responsive pleadings for Commission consideration must comply with � 1.2108 of this Chapter and must: (1) Identify the application or applications (including applicant's name, station location, Commission file numbers and radio service involved) with which it is concerned; (2) Be filed in accordance with the pleading limitations, filing periods, and other applicable provisions of �� 1.41 through 1.52 of this Chapter except where otherwise provided in � 1.2108 of this Chapter; (3) Contain specific allegations of fact which, except for facts of which official notice may be taken, shall be supported by affidavit of a person or persons with personal knowledge thereof, and which shall be sufficient to demonstrate that the petitioner (or respondent) is a party in
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/23/charts/23press2.pdf
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Summary Measures by Round FCC Local Multipoint Distribution Service Re-Auction ** Final ** RoundNew Bids New High Gross Bids Net Bids Eligible BiddersEligibility Ratio Stage Stage Trans. % 24 37 30 $56,500,000.00 $40,261,800.00 52 1.52 1 15.64 25 33 31 $57,642,000.00 $40,739,500.00 50 1.48 1 17.52 26 28 27 $58,697,000.00 $41,353,000.00 47 1.41 1 13.20 27 15 15 $59,604,000.00 $41,253,050.00 45 1.40 1 7.44 28 8 8 $59,982,000.00 $41,588,550.00 45 1.39 1 3.44 29 19 19 $60,146,000.00 $40,974,100.00 43 1.35 1 14.11 30 17 17 $60,624,000.00 $42,081,250.00 43 1.23 2 7.10 31 18 18 $61,782,000.00
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/23/releases/da990927.pdf
  • Forms To Be Filed Filers applying for multiple licenses are not required to submit a separate application for each market if all filing requirements associated with the application are identical except for the market designator and market name. Under these circumstances, applicants may submit one FCC Form 601 Main Form and Schedule B. Frivolous Pleadings Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.52, the Commission reminds parties to this proceeding and their attorneys that the Commission intends to use its authority fully to discourage and deter the filing of frivolous pleadings. See Public Notice, "Commission Taking Tough Measures Against Frivolous Pleadings," 11 FCC Rcd. 3030 (1996). Organization of Application Filing FCC Form 601 Electronically. Follow the instructions set forth in Attachment G to
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/43/releases/da012836.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/43/releases/da012836.txt
  • Oct. 10, 2001) ("Procedures PN"). Documents filed electronically as miscellaneous attachments to FCC Forms 175 remain subject to the restriction prohibiting the filing of major amendments to an FCC Form 175 after the initial short-form filing deadline, which, for Auction No. 43, was November 16, 2001. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105(b)(2); Procedures PN at 11. 5 See 47 C.F.R. � 1.52. 6 See Interim Electronic Filing Order, � 3.
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/61/comments/54564_1.pdf
  • Pursuant to the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC" or "Commission") Rule Section 1.41, PSI requests that the Bureau accept this Response to Reply Comments. The Reply Comments were irrelevant, as not limited to matters raised in PSI's Comments which went to the viability of Auction No. 61, 3 unsupported or insupportable by fact or by law or scandalous pursuant to Section 1.52 of the Rules. 2. Grant of this motion is necessary in order to allow basic procedural fairness to PSI. Consideration of the Commenters' Reply Comments with the offensive paragraphs, which have no basis in fact and are irrelevant to the Comments filed by PSI, would not only be procedurally incorrect, but would be grossly unfair to PSI if the Bureau
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/rss/index.htm?job=ainf&id=65
  • licenses in the 800 MHz band in the three alternative band configurations. Licenses in only one of these mutually incompatible band configurations will be awarded. Qualified Bidders: 9 Rounds Completed: 12 Bidding Days: 3 Results for Round 12 Gross Revenue: $9,565,000.00 - Dollar Change: 2213000.00 - % Change: 30.10 Net Revenue: $7,173,750.00 - Dollar Change: -111000.00 - % Change: - 1.52 New Bids: 7 Withdrawn Bids: 0 Proactive Waivers: 0 Bidders that Reduced Eligibility: 0 Licenses with PWBs*: 2 FCC Held Licenses: 0 Eligible Bidders: 8 (of 9 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=65T ue, 16 May 2006 19:05:01 GMT Summary Licenses: Auction No. 65 will offer nationwide commercial licenses in the 800 MHz band in the three
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/rss/index.htm?job=ainf&id=70
  • with PWBs*: 105 FCC Held Permits: 15 Eligible Bidders: 68 (of 114 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=70W ed, 14 Mar 2007 19:50:01 GMT Summary Permits: 120 construction permits in the FM broadcast service Qualified Bidders: 114 Rounds Completed: 25 Bidding Days: 6 Results for Round 25 Gross Revenue: $20,749,300.00 - Dollar Change: $309,800.00 - % Change: 1.52 Net Revenue: $17,908,780.00 - Dollar Change: $470,670.00 - % Change: 2.70 New Bids: 41 Withdrawn Bids: 0 Proactive Waivers: 2 Bidders that Reduced Eligibility: 14 Permits with PWBs*: 108 FCC Held Permits: 12 Eligible Bidders: 67 (of 114 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=70W ed, 14 Mar 2007 21:05:13 GMT Summary Permits: 120 construction permits in the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/fcc00022.doc
  • as amended, and the Commission's Rules. Date: (here insert the name and address of counsel for the complaining station). (b) A complaint lacking any of the foregoing information shall be dismissed by the FCC without prejudice to the complaining station. (c) Additional information may be provided, and, where applicable, should conform to the requirements set forth in �� 1.48 through 1.52 of the Commission's Rules. � 1.6003 Service Requirements. (a) General. Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. � 325(e), for purposes of any proceeding under this subsection, any satellite carrier that retransmits the signal of any broadcast station shall be deemed to designate the Secretary of the Commission as its agent for service of process. (b) Specific. (1) A television broadcast station shall
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.txt
  • for all pre-order functions reported, we rely on data starting in August because, as discussed below, Bell Atlantic made changes in the way that it calculates response times in August that more accurately capture response times experienced by competing carriers. For EDI unparsed CSR retrieval, Bell Atlantic failed to meet the standard by .95 of a second in August and 1.52 seconds in September. For EDI due date availability, Bell Atlantic met the standard each month. For EDI address validation, Bell Atlantic met the standard in August and deviated by 1.87 seconds in September. For EDI product and service availability, Bell Atlantic met the standard in August and deviated by .16 of a second in September. See Bell Atlantic Dowell/Canny Decl.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2002/fcc02331.pdf
  • Loop Design/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 4.03 4.83 4.82 4.52 5.33 4.63 4.50 4.58 5.00 4.21 B.2.1.8.2.12W Analog Loop Design/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 10.00 8.00 11.41 6.50 10.61 7.00 11.32 6.00 11.16 5.67 1,2,3,4,5 B.2.1.9.1.12W Analog Loop Non-Design/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 4.01 3.64 4.81 3.73 5.31 4.29 4.54 3.75 5.01 3.76 B.2.1.9.1.42W Analog Loop Non-Design/<10 circuits/Dispatch In/FL (days) 1.61 3.33 1.53 3.11 1.59 3.64 1.52 3.50 1.89 4.22 4,5 B.2.1.9.2.12W Analog Loop Non-Design/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 9.03 4.55 9.89 6.14 10.18 8.08 11.42 7.92 11.33 5.90 B.2.1.11.1.42W Analog Loop w/INP Non- Design/<10 circuits/Dispatch In/FL (days) 1.61 1.53 1.59 4.00 1.52 1.89 3 B - 25 Metric Metric Name [SQM Number] May June July August September Number and Disaggregation BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ldrpt103.pdf
  • 2.67 1977 0.28 0.83 1938 0.21 2.69 1978 0.29 0.78 1939 0.22 2.75 1979 0.29 0.71 1940 0.21 2.66 1980 0.30 0.65 1941 0.21 2.50 1981 0.33 0.64 1942 0.22 2.34 1982 0.34 0.63 1943 0.21 2.15 1983 0.35 0.62 1944 0.22 2.17 1984 0.32 0.55 1945 0.21 2.09 1985 0.31 0.51 1946 0.20 1.79 1986 0.28 0.45 1947 0.19 1.52 1987 0.25 0.38 1948 0.19 1.37 1988 0.23 0.35 1949 0.19 1.40 1989 0.22 0.31 1950 0.19 1.42 1990 0.20 0.27 1951 0.20 1.37 1991 0.20 0.26 1952 0.20 1.35 1992 0.19 0.24 $1.01 $0.15 1953 0.21 1.38 1993 0.19 0.24 1.02 0.15 1954 0.22 1.47 1994 0.18 0.21 0.93 0.14 1955 0.23 1.52 1995 0.17 0.20 0.91 0.12 1956
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Representative Monthly Charge * $12.58 $12.44 $12.32 $12.30 $12.36 $13.03 $13.05 $13.16 $13.19 $13.62 $13.71 $13.67 $13.75 $13.77 $13.64 $14.05 Subscriber Line Charges 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 3.54 3.53 3.52 3.58 4.50 5.03 Additional Monthly Charge for Touch-Tone Service 1.57 1.52 1.54 1.52 1.33 1.06 0.97 0.94 0.77 0.44 0.30 0.25 0.10 0.09 0.06 0.06 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.39 2.48 2.57 2.70 Total Monthly Charge $17.70 $18.18 $18.11 $19.05 $19.24 $19.77 $19.72 $19.95 $19.81 $20.01 $19.95 $19.88 $19.76 $19.93 $20.78 $21.84 Basic Connection Charge 45.63 44.04 42.94
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Representative Monthly Charge *$12.58 $12.44 $12.32 $12.30 $12.36 $13.03 $13.05 $13.16 $13.19 $13.62 $13.71 $13.67 $13.75 $13.77 $13.64 $14.49 $14.55 Subscriber Line Charges 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 3.54 3.53 3.52 3.58 4.50 5.05 5.64 Additional Monthly Charge for Touch-Tone Service 1.57 1.52 1.54 1.52 1.33 1.06 0.97 0.94 0.77 0.44 0.30 0.25 0.10 0.09 0.06 0.04 0.04 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.39 2.48 2.57 3.03 3.14 Total Monthly Charge $17.70 $18.18 $18.11 $19.05 $19.24 $19.77 $19.72 $19.95 $19.81 $20.01 $19.95 $19.88 $19.76 $19.93 $20.78 $22.62 $23.38 Basic Connection Charge
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • service offering. 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 1 2003 2 Representative Monthly Charge 3,4 $12.58$12.44$12.32$12.30$12.36$13.03$13.05$13.16$13.19$13.62$13.71$13.67$13.75$13.77 $13.64 $14.49 $14.38 $14.57 Subscriber Line Charges 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 3.54 3.53 3.52 3.58 4.50 5.05 5.74 5.91 Additional Monthly Charge for Touch- Tone Service 1.57 1.52 1.54 1.52 1.33 1.06 0.97 0.94 0.77 0.44 0.30 0.25 0.10 0.09 0.06 0.04 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.39 2.48 2.57 3.03 3.94 4.28 Total Monthly Charge $17.70$18.18$18.11$19.05$19.24$19.77$19.72$19.95$19.81$20.01$19.95$19.88$19.76$19.93 $20.78 $22.62 $24.07 $24.75 Basic Connection Charge 4 45.63 44.04 42.94 43.06 43.06 42.00 41.50 41.38 41.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 1 2004 2 Representative Monthly Charge 3,4 $12.58$12.44$12.32$12.30$12.36$13.03$13.05$13.16$13.19$13.62$13.71$13.67$13.75$13.77 $13.64 $14.49 $14.38 $14.54 $14.53 Subscriber Line Charges 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 3.54 3.53 3.52 3.58 4.50 5.05 5.74 5.86 5.81 Additional Monthly Charge for Touch- Tone Service 1.57 1.52 1.54 1.52 1.33 1.06 0.97 0.94 0.77 0.44 0.30 0.25 0.10 0.09 0.06 0.04 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.39 2.48 2.57 3.03 3.94 4.12 3.97 Total Monthly Charge $17.70$18.18$18.11$19.05$19.24$19.77$19.72$19.95$19.81$20.01$19.95$19.88$19.76$19.93 $20.78 $22.62 $24.07 $24.52 $24.31 Basic Connection Charge 4 45.63 44.04 42.94 43.06 43.06 42.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref97.pdf
  • as of October 15 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 Unlimited local calling 12.5812.4412.3212.3012.39 13.1013.1213.2213.2813.62 Federal and state SLCs 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 Taxes and 911 charges 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 1.85 2.00 2.03 2.17 2.24 2.34 Total for rotary service 16.1316.6616.5717.5317.79 18.6618.7018.9419.0719.49 Additional monthly charge for touch-tone service 1.57 1.52 1.54 1.52 1.47 1.17 1.08 1.04 0.74 0.49 (including tax) Total for touch-tone service 17.7018.1818.1119.0519.26 19.8319.7819.9819.8119.98 Lowest generally available monthly rate 5.96 5.81 5.67 5.67 5.68 6.18 6.22 6.43 6.47 6.68 Federal and state SLCs 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 Taxes and 911 charges 0.84 0.94 0.91 1.03 1.15 1.28 1.31 1.45 1.50 1.56 Total
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • Maintenance Plan $1.62 $1.99 3 Table 1.2 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-1997 (as of October 15) 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 Representative Monthly Charge * $12.58$12.44$12.32$12.30$12.36$13.03$13.05$13.16$13.19$13.62$13.71$13.82 Subscriber Line Charges 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 3.54 3.53 Additional Monthly Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.57 1.52 1.54 1.52 1.33 1.06 0.97 0.94 0.77 0.44 0.30 0.12 Taxes and 911 Charges 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.44 Total Monthly Charge 17.70 18.18 18.11 19.05 19.24 19.77 19.72 19.95 19.81 20.01 19.95 19.92 Basic Connection Charge 45.63 44.04 42.94 43.06 43.06 42.00 41.50 41.38 41.28 40.91 41.11 41.06 Additional Connection Charge for
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • $1.95 3 Table 1.2 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-1998 (as of October 15) 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 Representative Monthly Charge * $12.58$12.44$12.32$12.30$12.36$13.03$13.05$13.16$13.19$13.62$13.71 $13.67$13.77 Subscriber Line Charges 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 3.54 3.53 3.55 Additional Monthly Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.57 1.52 1.54 1.52 1.33 1.06 0.97 0.94 0.77 0.44 0.30 0.25 0.10 Other 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.44 Total Monthly Charge 17.70 18.18 18.11 19.05 19.24 19.77 19.72 19.95 19.81 20.01 19.95 19.88 19.85 Basic Connection Charge 45.63 44.04 42.94 43.06 43.06 42.00 41.50 41.38 41.28 40.91 41.11 41.04 41.31 Additional Connection Charge
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
  • OF RETURN DATA OCTOBER 1, 1985 - DECEMBER 31, 1986 REPORTS FILED SEPTEMBER 30, 1987 FINAL REPORT SWITCHED TRAFFIC SENSITIVE COMMON SPECIAL END LOCAL NO. NAME OF COMPANY INTERSTATE LINE ACCESS OFFICE INFORMATIONTRANSPORT TOTAL 69CONTINENTAL TELEPHONE CO. OF VIRGINIA 12.26 12.42 7.95 9.76 (87.89) 22.11 12.81 70C-R TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.09 12.38 - 4.12 - 16.50 7.73 71EAGLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS 11.70 12.44 (1.52) 10.99 - 6.94 9.95 72EAST ASCENSION TELEPHONE CO. 2/ 13.84 12.46 35.73 18.90 - 7.70 14.64 73EGYPTION TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE ASSN. 15.04 12.38 (0.55) 29.10 - (2.81) 21.40 74EL PASO TELEPHONE COMPANY 16.93 12.38 (3.93) 30.65 - 39.11 32.19 75ELKHART TELEPHONE COMPANY 2/ 11.59 12.95 (0.54) 21.16 - (4.29) 11.61 76FIDELITY TELEPHONE COMPANY 12.21 12.29 11.76 12.28 - 11.64 - 77GENERAL
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-95.pdf
  • TRS Exch, TRS (millions) (millions) (millions) (millions) (millions) (millions) (millions) ALABAMA $774 $74 $848 $926 1.74 $956 $21 $977 ARIZONA 697 (6) 691 737 1.38 761 16 777 ARKANSAS 303 7 310 405 0.76 418 9 427 CALIFORNIA 5,153 250 5,403 5,486 10.28 5,662 122 5,784 COLORADO 766 122 888 928 1.74 958 21 978 CONNECTICUT 618 185 803 811 1.52 837 18 855 DELAWARE 123 2 125 125 0.23 129 3 131 DC 299 44 343 343 0.64 354 8 362 FLORIDA 2,659 459 3,118 3,167 5.93 3,268 70 3,338 GEORGIA 1,462 112 1,574 1,853 3.47 1,912 41 1,953 HAWAII 236 43 279 279 0.52 288 6 294 IDAHO 145 (4) 142 153 0.29 158 3 161 ILLINOIS 2,281 156
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-96.pdf
  • is reduced by 0.31% and the interstate revenue is reduced by 0.37%. This takes into account revenue from Alaska, Guam, Northern Mariana Islands, and the Virgin Islands. 20 Table 10 Industry Telephone Revenue by State for 1996 Interstate Intrastate Intrastate+Interstate Percent Of Total (Millions) (Millions) (Millions) ALABAMA $1,303 $1,795 $3,097 1.39 ALASKA 251 290 541 0.24 ARIZONA 1,790 1,590 3,380 1.52 ARKANSAS 773 982 1,754 0.79 CALIFORNIA 8,890 17,070 25,961 11.68 COLORADO 1,823 1,859 3,683 1.66 CONNECTICUT 1,499 1,575 3,075 1.38 DELAWARE 352 236 588 0.26 DIST. OF COLUMBIA 566 447 1,013 0.46 FLORIDA 5,945 7,543 13,488 6.07 GEORGIA 3,034 3,617 6,651 2.99 HAWAII 414 474 887 0.40 IDAHO 500 432 932 0.42 ILLINOIS 3,902 5,441 9,343 4.20 INDIANA 1,730 2,629
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-97.pdf
  • 6,668 (6,668) 0.00 1.04 (1.04) DIST. OF COLUMBIA 0 9,255 (9,255) 0.00 0.84 (0.84) FLORIDA 22,140 113,265 (91,125) 0.18 0.90 (0.72) GEORGIA 71,803 55,097 16,706 1.25 0.96 0.29 HAWAII 899 6,965 (6,067) 0.11 0.82 (0.71) IDAHO 28,564 8,676 19,888 3.50 1.06 2.43 ILLINOIS 22,723 74,076 (51,353) 0.24 0.77 (0.54) INDIANA 16,037 31,542 (15,505) 0.39 0.76 (0.37) IOWA 29,053 16,582 12,471 1.52 0.87 0.65 KANSAS 58,180 16,677 41,503 3.06 0.88 2.18 KENTUCKY 25,185 21,261 3,924 1.02 0.86 0.16 LOUISIANA 66,764 23,103 43,660 2.28 0.79 1.49 MAINE 16,853 7,660 9,193 1.74 0.79 0.95 MARYLAND 591 37,552 (36,961) 0.01 0.90 (0.88) MASSACHUSETTS 367 47,350 (46,983) 0.01 0.88 (0.88) MICHIGAN 32,654 47,514 (14,861) 0.43 0.63 (0.20) MINNESOTA 38,395 29,434 8,961 1.11 0.85 0.26 MISSISSIPPI 27,469
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-99.pdf
  • quarterly true-ups. USF is an abbreviation for the Universal Service Fund. Table 11 (Annual Payments and Contributions in Thousands) Total Monthly per Loop Alabama $87,650 $2.90 $30,116 $1.00 $57,535 $1.90 Alaska 71,240 12.94 5,516 1.00 1 11.94 Arizona 35,414 0.99 45,109 1.27 -9,695 -0.27 Arkansas 72,887 4.05 18,481 1.03 54,406 3.02 California 65,692 0.24 207,324 0.76 -141,632 -0.52 Colorado 52,369 1.52 45,410 1.32 6,959 0.20 Connecticut 886 0.03 35,808 1.23 -34,922 -1.20 Delaware 195 0.03 9,067 1.30 -8,872 -1.27 District of Columbia 0 0.00 12,863 1.16 -12,863 -1.16 Florida 50,466 0.37 151,591 1.12 -101,124 -0.75 Georgia 79,527 1.27 72,344 1.16 7,184 0.11 Hawaii 2,055 0.24 8,616 0.99 -6,561 -0.76 Idaho 35,850 4.07 11,253 1.28 24,598 2.80 Illinois 31,393 0.31 98,816 0.99
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend100.pdf
  • interstate calls are greater than 200 miles and more than 5% of calls are to international points. 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999** Representative Monthly Charge * $12.58$12.44$12.32$12.30$12.36$13.03$13.05$13.16$13.19$13.62$13.71$13.67$13.75$13.75 Subscriber Line Charges 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 3.54 3.53 3.52 3.58 Additional Monthly Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.57 1.52 1.54 1.52 1.33 1.06 0.97 0.94 0.77 0.44 0.30 0.25 0.10 0.09 Taxes and Other Charges 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.39 2.45 Total Monthly Charge 17.70 18.18 18.11 19.05 19.24 19.77 19.72 19.95 19.81 20.01 19.95 19.88 19.76 19.87 Basic Connection Charge 45.63 44.04 42.94 43.06 43.06 42.00 41.50 41.38 41.28 40.91
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend199.pdf
  • in Urban Areas (as of October 15, 1986-1998) 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 Representative Monthly Charge * $12.58 $12.44 $12.32 $12.30 $12.36 $13.03 $13.05 $13.16 $13.19 $13.62 $13.71 $13.67 $13.77 Subscriber Line Charges 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 3.54 3.53 3.55 Additional Monthly Charge forTouch-tone Service 1.57 1.52 1.54 1.52 1.33 1.06 0.97 0.94 0.77 0.44 0.30 0.25 0.10 Taxes and 911 Charges 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.44 Total Monthly Charge 17.70 18.18 18.11 19.05 19.24 19.77 19.72 19.95 19.81 20.01 19.95 19.88 19.85 Basic Connection Charge 45.63 44.04 42.94 43.06 43.06 42.00 41.50 41.38 41.28 40.91 41.11 41.04 41.31
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • 14-2 international points. 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Representative Monthly Charge 1/ $12.58 $12.44 $12.32 $12.30 $12.36 $13.03 $13.05 $13.16 $13.19 $13.62 $13.71 $13.67 $13.75 $13.75 Subscriber Line Charges 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 3.54 3.53 3.52 3.58 Additional Monthly Charge for Touch- Tone Service 1.57 1.52 1.54 1.52 1.33 1.06 0.97 0.94 0.77 0.44 0.30 0.25 0.10 0.09 Taxes and Other Charges 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.39 2.45 Total Monthly Charge 17.70 18.18 18.11 19.05 19.24 19.77 19.72 19.95 19.81 20.01 19.95 19.88 19.76 19.87 Basic Connection Charge 45.63 44.04 42.94 43.06 43.06 42.00 41.50 41.38 41.28 40.91
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend298.pdf
  • BellSouth 1.41 0.03 0.80 0.27 3.74 27,870 45,484 73,846 NYNEX 1.26 0.00 1.44 0.26 4.85 18,536 36,892 56,308 Pacific Telesis 0.03 0.00 0.72 0.36 2.24 12,977 26,034 39,054 SBC 0.00 0.00 0.96 0.29 2.57 15,773 25,814 42,030 U S WEST 0.56 0.00 1.02 0.65 4.01 21,351 34,436 55,908 GTE 2.00 1.15 0.92 0.19 5.57 18,388 29,819 48,834 Aliant 0.06 0.00 1.52 0.32 3.85 258 426 688 Frontier 1.19 0.26 1.29 0.36 4.93 735 1,659 2,396 SNET 0.34 0.00 1.29 0.28 3.60 3,178 5,095 8,276 Sprint Local 1.29 0.61 1.06 0.22 4.62 8,213 12,767 21,110 Citizens 2.64 1.57 1.85 0.42 9.06 1,077 1,431 2,520 Cincinnati Bell 0.55 0.00 0.85 0.17 2.69 1,111 1,799 2,912 All Price Caps 0.91 0.15 0.92 0.30 3.64
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend299.pdf
  • 4.20 0.64 10,232 1,539 4,014 888 RBOCs 3.50 5.81 6.78 1.04 1.67 2.77 0.37 76,972 14,071 30,059 11,573 Aliant 3.50 6.07 6.77 1.04 1.13 1.13 0.35 182 16 47 30 Cincinnati Bell 3.50 6.07 6.30 1.04 2.09 2.09 0.23 645 79 213 72 Citizens 3.50 5.99 9.09 1.04 2.37 4.20 1.05 709 41 121 53 Frontier 3.50 5.57 5.88 1.04 1.52 1.95 0.31 648 70 171 81 GTE 3.50 6.07 8.62 1.04 2.53 4.31 0.82 12,294 1,415 3,219 1,207 SNET 3.50 6.07 8.02 1.04 2.38 2.38 0.51 1,421 134 198 379 Sprint Local 3.50 5.84 7.42 1.01 2.05 3.78 0.52 5,018 618 1,238 451 Independent Price Caps 3.50 6.00 8.09 1.03 2.34 3.91 0.67 20,918 2,373 5,206 2,273 All Price Caps
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
  • 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Representative Monthly Charge 1/ $12.58 $12.44 $12.32 $12.30 $12.36 $13.03 $13.05 $13.16 $13.19 $13.62 $13.71 $13.67 $13.75 $13.77 $13.64 $14.0 5 Subscriber Line Charges 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 3.54 3.53 3.52 3.58 4.50 5.03 Additional Monthly Charge for Touch - Tone Service 1.57 1.52 1.54 1.52 1.33 1.06 0.97 0.94 0.77 0.44 0.30 0.25 0.10 0.09 0.06 0.06 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.39 2.48 2.57 2.70 Total Monthly Charge $17.70 $18.18 $18.11 $19.05 $19.24 $19.77 $19.72 $19.95 $19.81 $20.01 $19.95 $19.88 $19.76 $19.93 $20.78 $21.84 Basic Connection Charge $45.63 $44.04 $42.94
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • LDMI & Fonetel) 4,452,556 38,712,022 9,819,083 0.20 McLeodUSA Incorporated 10,831,404 33,862,587 9,728,647 0.20 Net One International, Inc. 23,358,589 560,606 4,671,718 0.10 Network Communications International Corporation 576,343 2,873,976 15,614,731 0.32 NOS Communications, Inc. 13,327,799 119,406,702 30,365,500 0.62 PaeTec Communications, Inc. 10,152,658 40,559,986 10,154,196 0.21 PT-1 Long Distance, Inc. 40,516,128 296,826,557 24,909,900 0.51 Qwest Communications International, Inc. (including USLD) 54,979,857 356,325,154 73,971,433 1.52 Reach Services USA 85,363,586 357,001,804 46,979,578 0.96 Sprint Corporation 129,106,718 644,205,769 183,939,580 3.78 Startec Global Communications Corporation 58,183,315 383,386,662 52,532,699 1.08 Talk America Inc. 10,502,139 65,698,277 14,649,488 0.30 Telco Group Inc. 155,284,307 1,567,145,880 314,025,607 6.45 TeleDirect Telecommunications Group, LLC 31,165,761 131,248,657 17,769,000 0.36 Telenational Communications, Inc. 3,503,091 35,030,910 4,378,864 0.09 Trans National Communications International, Inc. 727,579,682 524,092,991 19,896,117 0.41 UniPlex
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • 2001 2002 2003 1 2004 2 Representative Monthly Charge 3 4 $12.58 $12.44 $12.32 $12.30 $12.36 $13.03 $13.05 $13.16 $13.19 $13.62 $13.71 $13.67 $13.75 $13.77 $13.64 $14.49 $14.38 $14.54 $14.53 Subscriber Line Charges 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 3.54 3.53 3.52 3.58 4.50 5.05 5.74 5.86 5.81 Additional Monthly Charge for Touch- Tone Service 1.57 1.52 1.54 1.52 1.33 1.06 0.97 0.94 0.77 0.44 0.30 0.25 0.10 0.09 0.06 0.04 4 4 4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.39 2.48 2.57 3.03 3.94 4.12 3.97 Total Monthly Charge $17.70 $18.18 $18.11 $19.05 $19.24 $19.77 $19.72 $19.95 $19.81 $20.01 $19.95 $19.88 $19.76 $19.93 $20.78 $22.62
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
  • 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Representative Monthly Charge 1/ $12.58 $12.44 $12.32 $12.30 $12.36 $13.03 $13.05 $13.16 $13.19 $13.62 $13.71 $13.67 $13.75 $13.77 $13.64 Subscriber Line Charges 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 3.54 3.53 3.52 3.58 4.50 Additional Monthly Charge for Touch- Tone Service 1.57 1.52 1.54 1.52 1.33 1.06 0.97 0.94 0.77 0.44 0.30 0.25 0.10 0.09 0.06 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.39 2.48 2.57 Total Monthly Charge $17.70 $18.18 $18.11 $19.05 $19.24 $19.77 $19.72 $19.95 $19.81 $20.01 $19.95 $19.88 $19.76 $19.93 $20.78 Basic Connection Charge $45.63 $44.04 $42.94 $43.06 $43.06 $42.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.20 1.13 27,108 55,240 76,617 Cincinnati Bell 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.26 1.60 992 2,133 3,134 Citizens 0.12 0.00 0.71 0.54 2.69 2,035 4,506 6,560 Iowa Telecomm 0.03 0.00 0.86 0.27 2.36 413 326 739 Qwest 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.15 1.41 20,509 37,988 58,539 SBC 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.17 1.25 71,493 76,858 149,482 Sprint 0.02 0.00 0.60 0.13 1.52 6,978 18,896 26,128 Valor 0.54 0.11 0.78 0.34 2.98 358 916 1,274 Verizon 0.02 0.00 0.42 0.23 1.35 53,826 128,385 182,882 Price Caps 0.01 0.00 0.44 0.20 1.33 183,968 325,891 506,268 NECA 0.20 0.20 1.45 0.83 5.08 11,755 21,652 18,521 All Price Caps and NECA 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 195,723 347,543 524,789 Source: Access tariff filings. 2 Non-traffic sensitive
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd00.pdf
  • 1.20 1.36 1.33 1.23 1.35 1.19 1.27 0.84 0.73 Netherlands 1.14 1.07 1.06 1.03 1.02 0.86 0.78 0.57 0.50 0.40 0.44 Nigeria 0.96 1.09 1.06 1.14 1.17 1.09 1.08 0.86 0.79 0.68 0.67 Pakistan 1.79 1.76 1.80 1.77 1.70 1.56 1.53 1.24 1.12 0.99 0.74 Peru 1.11 1.12 1.15 1.14 1.07 1.03 1.03 0.87 0.87 0.80 0.67 Philippines 1.48 1.92 1.52 1.52 1.41 1.29 1.29 1.08 0.96 0.76 0.62 Poland 1.02 1.07 1.07 1.10 1.06 0.90 0.85 0.73 0.76 0.57 0.41 Russia 16/ 2.11 2.03 1.97 1.99 1.94 1.82 1.57 1.28 1.17 0.69 0.62 Saudi Arabia 1.22 1.34 1.37 1.34 1.41 1.25 1.20 1.05 1.08 1.00 0.88 Sierra Leone 2.49 2.11 1.93 1.93 1.94 1.78 1.80 1.22 1.07 0.47 0.75 Singapore
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd01.pdf
  • 1.27 0.84 0.73 0.62 0.43 0.24 -81.5 Netherlands 1.03 1.02 0.86 0.78 0.57 0.50 0.40 0.44 0.47 0.38 0.21 -58.4 Nigeria 1.14 1.17 1.09 1.08 0.86 0.79 0.68 0.67 0.42 0.41 0.31 -61.5 Pakistan 1.77 1.70 1.56 1.53 1.24 1.12 0.99 0.74 0.67 0.46 0.29 -74.2 Peru 1.14 1.07 1.03 1.03 0.87 0.87 0.80 0.67 0.49 0.31 0.20 -77.5 Philippines 1.52 1.41 1.29 1.29 1.08 0.96 0.76 0.62 0.47 0.31 0.26 -73.4 Poland 1.10 1.06 0.90 0.85 0.73 0.76 0.57 0.41 0.39 0.37 0.26 -65.2 Russia 1.99 1.94 1.82 1.57 1.28 1.17 0.69 0.62 0.43 0.27 0.24 -79.6 Saudi Arabia 1.34 1.41 1.25 1.20 1.05 1.08 1.00 0.88 0.75 0.53 0.30 -72.6 Sierra Leone 1.93 1.94 1.78 1.80 1.22 1.07 0.47
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-2.pdf
  • 7.75 13.00 12.99 Connecticut 6.10 7.53 7.53 1.16 1.16 1.16 0.58 0.58 0.58 6.68 8.11 8.11 7.84 9.27 9.27 Delaware 7.75 7.75 7.75 2.30 2.30 2.30 1.15 1.15 1.15 8.90 8.90 8.90 11.20 11.20 11.20 District of Columbia 5.61 5.61 5.61 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 7.36 7.36 7.36 10.86 10.86 10.86 Florida 7.75 7.75 7.75 3.04 3.50 3.50 1.52 1.75 1.75 9.27 9.50 9.50 12.31 13.00 12.99 Georgia 7.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 3.50 3.43 0.00 1.75 1.71 7.75 9.50 9.46 7.75 13.00 12.89 Guam 7.75 7.75 7.75 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.50 9.50 9.50 13.00 13.00 13.00 Hawaii 7.75 7.75 7.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.75 Idaho 6.75 7.75 7.75
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • 452191 C ACCIPITER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 10.34 11.30 -0.86 10.00 452200 C FORT MOJAVE TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 5.12 6.97 -1.72 0.46 452226 C MIDVALE TELEPHONE EXCHANGE, INC.-ARIZONA 36.02 3.25 31.73 51.68 452302 C VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC. - AZ -11.83 2.18 -13.72 -44.99 453334 C TABLE TOP TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. 16.77 2.23 14.23 29.78 454426 C CITIZENS TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO OF WHITE MTNS 11.38 1.52 9.71 19.27 454449 C NAVAJO COMMUNICATIONS CO INC-AZ 7.11 8.92 -1.65 -0.93 455101 C QWEST CORPORATION - AZ (+ 457991A SADDLEBACK) 2.43 -1.92 4.43 0.00 457991 C SADDLEBACK COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY Previously unserved territory 457991A C SADDLEBACK COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY (QWEST) Exchanges acquired from 455101 QWEST CORP-AZ TOTAL: ARKANSAS 5.08 -2.49 7.76 18.30 401142 C CENTURYTEL OF NW ARKANSAS, LLC - RUSSELLVILLE
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 100) Table 7.5 Producer Price Indices - Continued 7 - 18 Year 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Representative Monthly Charge *$12.58$12.44$12.32$12.30$12.36$13.03$13.05$13.16$13.19$13.62$13.71$13.67$13.75$13.77$13.64$14.49$14.55 Subscriber Line Charges 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 3.54 3.53 3.52 3.58 4.50 5.05 5.64 Additional Monthly Charge for Touch-Tone Service 1.57 1.52 1.54 1.52 1.33 1.06 0.97 0.94 0.77 0.44 0.30 0.25 0.10 0.09 0.06 0.04 0.04 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.39 2.48 2.57 3.03 3.14 Total Monthly Charge 17.70 18.18 18.11 19.05 19.24 19.77 19.72 19.95 19.81 20.01 19.95 19.88 19.76 19.93 20.78 22.62 23.38 Basic Connection Charge
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 3 5 6 9 Nebraska 159,617 NA 0.74 27 42 53 70 Nevada 142,826 NA 0.66 24 38 47 63 New Hampshire 109,610 NA 0.51 18 29 36 48 New Jersey 396,865 NA 1.83 67 105 131 175 New Mexico * 13,062 0.06 2 4 4 6 New York 3,259,221 NA 15.06 548 859 1,077 1,437 North Carolina 328,715 NA 1.52 55 87 109 145 North Dakota * 43,950 0.21 8 12 15 20 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Ohio 510,623 NA 2.36 86 135 169 225 Oklahoma 203,028 NA 0.94 34 54 67 90 Oregon 154,492 NA 0.71 26 41 51 68 Pennsylvania 1,329,357 NA 6.14 224 350 439 586 Puerto Rico * 47,499 0.23
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-2.pdf
  • 8.25 13.50 13.49 Connecticut 6.10 7.53 7.53 1.18 1.18 1.17 0.59 0.59 0.59 6.69 8.12 8.11 7.87 9.30 9.28 Delaware 8.23 8.23 8.23 2.30 2.30 2.30 1.15 1.15 1.15 9.38 9.38 9.38 11.68 11.68 11.68 District of Columbia 5.62 5.62 5.62 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 7.37 7.37 7.37 10.87 10.87 10.87 Florida 8.25 8.25 8.25 3.04 3.50 3.50 1.52 1.75 1.75 9.77 10.00 10.00 12.81 13.50 13.49 Georgia 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 3.41 0.00 1.75 1.71 8.25 10.00 9.96 8.25 13.50 13.37 Guam 8.25 8.25 8.25 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 10.00 10.00 10.00 13.50 13.50 13.50 Hawaii 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25 Idaho 6.50 8.25 8.25
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • Dakota 3.23 -4.17 7.72 9.37 Tennessee 1.60 -2.82 4.54 7.11 Texas -4.26 -3.30 -0.99 3.74 Utah 1.16 -4.78 6.25 4.71 Vermont -2.18 -0.96 -1.24 -11.03 Virgin Islands -4.72 0.80 -5.48 -15.51 Virginia -2.06 -2.55 0.51 -36.58 Washington 1.25 -3.38 4.80 -9.48 West Virginia -2.73 -1.35 -1.40 -8.92 Wisconsin -2.51 -4.63 2.22 12.04 Wyoming 0.21 -2.62 2.90 -1.14 Industry -1.48 -2.95 1.52 1.24 * Percentage changes from 2003 to 2004. Source: Calculated from National Exchange Carrier Association data. High Cost Loop Support Payments in Later Year* NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop Unseparated Unseparated NTS Revenue Requirement Number of Loops 3 - 30 State or Jurisdiction 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Alabama 668,647,749 687,816,460 677,435,289 725,835,931 746,451,215 Alaska 159,465,673 176,042,390 178,266,722 184,295,000 201,396,103
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
  • Continued 51711031 (June 1995 = 100) Table 7.5 7-19 Year 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002* 2003** Representative Monthly Charge ***$12.58$12.44$12.32$12.30$12.36$13.03$13.05$13.16$13.19$13.62$13.71$13.67$13.75$13.77$13.64$14.49$14.38$14.57 Subscriber Line Charges 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 3.54 3.53 3.52 3.58 4.50 5.05 5.74 5.91 Additional Monthly Charge for Touch-Tone Service 1.57 1.52 1.54 1.52 1.33 1.06 0.97 0.94 0.77 0.44 0.30 0.25 0.10 0.09 0.06 0.04 **** **** Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.39 2.48 2.57 3.03 3.94 4.28 Total Monthly Charge 17.70 18.18 18.11 19.05 19.24 19.77 19.72 19.95 19.81 20.01 19.95 19.88 19.76 19.93 20.78 22.62 24.07 24.75
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-7.pdf
  • months after release 7 - 17 TABLE 7.7 AVERAGE RESIDENTIAL RATES FOR LOCAL SERVICE IN URBAN AREAS (as of October 15) 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 Representative Monthly Charge * $12.58$12.44$12.32$12.30$12.36$13.03$13.05$13.16$13.19$13.62$13.71$13.82 Subscriber Line Charges 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 3.54 3.53 Additional Monthly Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.57 1.52 1.54 1.52 1.33 1.06 0.97 0.94 0.77 0.44 0.30 0.12 Taxes and 911 Charges 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.44 Total Monthly Charge 17.70 18.18 18.11 19.05 19.24 19.77 19.72 19.95 19.81 20.01 19.95 19.92 Basic Connection Charge $45.63$44.04$42.94$43.06$43.06$42.00$41.50$41.38$41.28$40.91$41.11$41.06 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.34 1.31 1.55 1.76 1.77 1.27 1.22 1.23 0.85
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-7.pdf
  • 4.20 0.64 10,232 1,539 4,014 888 RBOCs 3.50 5.81 6.78 1.04 1.67 2.77 0.37 76,972 14,071 30,059 11,573 Aliant 3.50 6.07 6.77 1.04 1.13 1.13 0.35 182 16 47 30 Cincinnati Bell 3.50 6.07 6.30 1.04 2.09 2.09 0.23 645 79 213 72 Citizens 3.50 5.99 9.09 1.04 2.37 4.20 1.05 709 41 121 53 Frontier 3.50 5.57 5.88 1.04 1.52 1.95 0.31 648 70 171 81 GTE 3.50 6.07 8.62 1.04 2.53 4.31 0.82 12,294 1,415 3,219 1,207 SNET 3.50 6.07 8.02 1.04 2.38 2.38 0.51 1,421 134 198 379 Sprint Local 3.50 5.84 7.42 1.01 2.05 3.78 0.52 5,018 618 1,238 451 Independent Price Caps 3.50 6.00 8.09 1.03 2.34 3.91 0.67 20,918 2,373 5,206 2,273 All Price Caps
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-7.pdf
  • - 18 Table 7.7 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-1998 (as of October 15) 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 Representative Monthly Charge * $12.58$12.44$12.32$12.30$12.36$13.03$13.05$13.16$13.19$13.62$13.71 $13.67$13.77 Subscriber Line Charges 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 3.54 3.53 3.55 Additional Monthly Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.57 1.52 1.54 1.52 1.33 1.06 0.97 0.94 0.77 0.44 0.30 0.25 0.10 Other Mandatory Payments 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.44 Total Monthly Charge 17.70 18.18 18.11 19.05 19.24 19.77 19.72 19.95 19.81 20.01 19.95 19.88 19.85 Basic Connection Charge 45.63 44.04 42.94 43.06 43.06 42.00 41.50 41.38 41.28 40.91 41.11 41.04 41.31 Additional
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • (as of October 15) 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Representative Monthly Charge * $12.58 $12.44 $12.32 $12.30 $12.36 $13.03 $13.05 $13.16 $13.19 $13.62 $13.71 $13.67 $13.75 $13.75 Subscriber Line Charges 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 3.54 3.53 3.52 3.58 Additional Monthly Charge for Touch-tone Service 1.57 1.52 1.54 1.52 1.33 1.06 0.97 0.94 0.77 0.44 0.30 0.25 0.10 0.09 Taxes 911 and Other Charges 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 2.00 2.12 2.15 2.29 2.31 2.41 2.40 2.42 2.39 2.45 Total Monthly Charge 17.70 18.18 18.11 19.05 19.24 19.77 19.72 19.95 19.81 20.01 19.95 19.88 19.76 19.87 Basic Connection Charge 45.63 44.04 42.94 43.06 43.06 42.00 41.50 41.38 41.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • Support 3 - 21 (Annual Payments and Contributions in Thousands) Jurisdiction Total Monthly per Loop Alabama $87,650 $2.90 $30,123 $1.00 $57,527 $1.90 Alaska 71,240 12.94 5,518 1.00 $65,722 11.94 American Samoa 591 4.69 0 0.00 591 4.69 Arizona 35,414 0.99 45,121 1.27 -9,707 -0.27 Arkansas 72,887 4.05 18,486 1.03 54,401 3.02 California 65,692 0.24 207,379 0.76 -141,687 -0.52 Colorado 52,369 1.52 45,422 1.32 6,947 0.20 Connecticut 886 0.03 35,817 1.23 -34,932 -1.20 Delaware 195 0.03 9,069 1.30 -8,874 -1.27 District of Columbia 0 0.00 12,867 1.16 -12,867 -1.16 Florida 50,466 0.37 151,631 1.12 -101,164 -0.75 Georgia 79,527 1.27 72,363 1.16 7,165 0.11 Guam 3,266 3.51 672 0.72 2,594 2.79 Hawaii 2,055 0.24 8,618 0.99 -6,564 -0.76 Idaho 35,850 4.07 11,256 1.28
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • 18,194 1.50 6,060 0.50 12,134 1.00 New York 12,687 0 12,687 0.08 66,279 0.42 -53,592 -0.34 North Carolina 9,031 1,332 10,363 0.17 27,987 0.45 -17,625 -0.28 North Dakota 11,076 0 11,076 2.32 2,676 0.56 8,400 1.76 N. Mariana Islands 1,721 0 1,721 6.83 103 0.41 1,619 6.43 Ohio 6,876 0 6,876 0.08 32,749 0.39 -25,873 -0.31 Oklahoma 38,404 0 38,404 1.52 10,138 0.40 28,266 1.12 Oregon 23,809 0 23,809 0.90 12,501 0.47 11,308 0.43 Pennsylvania 1,065 0 1,065 0.01 40,235 0.40 -39,171 -0.39 Puerto Rico 0 20,279 20,279 1.27 4,880 0.31 15,399 0.96 Rhode Island 0 0 0 0.00 4,136 0.52 -4,136 -0.52 South Carolina 19,276 0 19,276 0.67 13,456 0.47 5,819 0.20 South Dakota 8,712 0 8,712 1.69 2,818 0.55
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/00socc.pdf
  • 0.404OH Oklahoma 306.0 306.0 33.9 272.1 123.7 50.9 97.5 272.1 OK Oregon 503.5 8.72 494.7 104.4 390.4 185.4 71.0 131.6 388.1 2.303OR Pennsylvania 1,688.3 20.49 1,667.8 458.1 1,209.8 571.1 173.4 406.0 1,150.4 59.347PA Rhode Island 111.7 2.23 109.5 5.4 104.1 52.4 22.7 29.0 104.1 RI South Carolina 383.5 9.05 374.5 83.6 290.8 150.8 54.5 82.6 287.8 3.019SC South Dakota 82.7 1.52 81.2 20.5 60.7 22.7 11.7 25.9 60.3 0.434SD Tennessee 513.1 12.37 500.7 38.5 462.3 232.7 86.1 138.0 456.8 5.532TN Texas 2,825.8 24.47 2,801.4 724.8 2,076.5 959.4 289.4 827.6 2,076.3 0.204TX Utah 265.7 6.64 259.1 36.4 222.6 96.7 38.9 85.2 220.8 1.894UT Vermont 82.7 1.18 81.5 12.9 68.6 27.9 19.9 20.9 68.6 VT Virginia 1,170.4 21.47 1,148.9 313.3 835.6 395.0 123.7
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/01socc.pdf
  • (0.005) 19.8 19.9 (0.08) (0.08)AZ Arkansas 48.2 48.2 48.0 0.19 0.19AR California 988.0 0.048 988.0 988.3 (0.28) (0.28)CA Colorado 35.7 35.7 35.8 (0.02) (0.02)CO Connecticut 198.5 198.5 191.8 6.73 6.73CT Delaware 12.8 12.8 7.5 5.30 1.000 1.883 2.883 2.42DE District of Columbia 2.5 2.5 0.0 2.52 0.327 0.596 0.923 1.60DC Florida 158.2 158.2 157.6 0.62 0.62FL Georgia 105.9 105.9 104.4 1.52 1.52GA Hawaii 8.0 8.0 8.0 0.04 0.04HI Idaho 11.0 0.138 10.8 9.6 1.23 1.23ID Illinois 304.4 304.4 273.3 31.09 31.09IL Indiana 108.3 108.3 94.3 13.97 13.97IN Iowa 18.4 0.099 18.3 17.5 0.82 0.82IA Kansas 40.0 40.0 33.3 6.72 6.72KS Kentucky 30.5 0.470 30.1 29.5 0.59 0.008 0.008 0.58KY Louisiana 38.0 38.0 37.8 0.18 0.18LA Maine 68.0 68.0 68.0 (0.00) (0.00)ME
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/95socc.pdf
  • KANSAS 279.6 (2.58) 282.2 91.3 190.9 88.0 67.9 35.1 190.9 KS KENTUCKY 366.0 (0.97) 367.0 99.6 267.4 148.8 86.5 31.5 266.8 0.646 KY LOUISIANA 400.2 1.56 398.7 93.6 305.1 174.9 92.7 36.4 304.0 1.140 LA MAINE 135.5 2.14 133.3 16.5 116.8 42.5 61.6 12.7 116.8 ME MARYLAND 542.4 (0.07) 542.4 116.6 425.9 202.1 158.3 64.8 425.2 0.692 MD MASSACHUSETTS 803.9 (1.52) 805.4 56.2 749.2 295.0 390.4 63.8 749.2 MA MICHIGAN 931.7 3.56 928.2 279.2 649.0 331.9 234.5 82.2 648.6 0.437 MI MINNESOTA 427.6 (0.45) 428.1 132.2 295.9 130.8 118.6 46.5 295.9 MN MISSISSIPPI 257.9 5.96 251.9 34.6 217.4 128.5 65.3 22.7 216.6 0.794 MS MISSOURI 699.6 (1.72) 701.4 185.5 515.9 263.6 160.5 91.8 515.9 MO MONTANA 78.2 0.09 78.1 19.6 58.4
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/96socc.pdf
  • ILLINOIS 1,128.7 (11.38) 1,140.1 185.6 954.4 390.5 406.8 155.8 953.1 1.379 IL INDIANA 657.0 (6.06) 663.1 213.8 449.3 205.8 177.2 65.8 448.8 0.472 IN IOWA 322.6 (3.28) 325.9 112.6 213.4 89.7 90.3 33.3 213.4 IA KANSAS 298.3 1.51 296.8 101.0 195.8 87.8 69.0 39.1 195.8 KS KENTUCKY 390.3 (0.29) 390.6 103.8 286.8 158.7 90.4 37.1 286.3 0.561 KY LOUISIANA 388.1 1.52 386.6 83.9 302.7 170.5 92.3 38.8 301.7 1.005 LA MAINE 156.0 3.52 152.5 35.1 117.4 42.9 58.5 16.0 117.4 ME MARYLAND 559.5 0.56 558.9 123.5 435.4 206.0 155.3 73.5 434.8 0.677 MD MASSACHUSETTS 851.5 (0.24) 851.7 70.1 781.6 298.0 395.4 88.3 781.6 MA MICHIGAN 967.4 (0.04) 967.5 275.3 692.2 336.3 251.0 104.3 691.5 0.669 MI MINNESOTA 433.0 (1.23) 434.3 116.8
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/97socc.pdf
  • MELILLA) (INCLUDING FORMER GERMAN SWEDEN 1.48 0.96 DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC) SWITZERLAND 1.58 0.98 GREECE 2.19 1.47TAIWAN 2.24 1.36 GUAM 2.19 1.07THAILAND 2.26 1.42 GUATEMALA 1.98 1.58TRINIDAD & TOBAGO, REPUBLIC OF 1.82 1.43 HAITI 1.97 1.67TURKEY 2.07 1.48 HONDURAS 2.15 1.58UNITED KINGDOM (INCLUDING THE 1.22 0.89 HONG KONG 2.07 1.35 CHANNEL ISLANDS, ENGLAND, INDIA 2.96 2.42 ISLE OF MAN, NORTHERN IRELAND, IRELAND 1.52 1.00 SCOTLAND AND WALES) ISRAEL 2.21 1.49VENEZUELA 1.52 1.14 SERVICE CHARGE PER CALL CLASS OF SERVICE AT&T CARD LEC CARD COMMERCIAL CREDIT CARD CUSTOMER DIALED CALLING CARD STATION: CUSTOMER DIALED/AUTOMATED $2.00 $2.50 $3.50 CUSTOMER DIALED AND OPERATOR ASSISTED $2.50 $3.00 $4.00 CUSTOMER DIALED AND OPERATOR MUST ASSIST $2.50 $3.00 $4.00 OPERATOR DIALED CALLING CARD STATION: N/A N/A N/A PERSON-TO-PERSON N/A
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/98SOCC.PDF
  • ISLANDS (CNMI). ** INCLUDING REAL TIME RATED CALLS AND ALL COLLECT CALLS. 229 STATISTICS OF COMMUNICATIONS COMMON CARRIERS TABLE 5.6-AT&T RATES FOR LONG DISTANCE MESSAGE TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE UNITED STATES-OVERSEAS DIAL STATION DIAL STATION COUNTRY STANDARD ECONOMY COUNTRY STANDARD ECONOMY ARGENTINA $2.30 $1.58 JAMAICA $1.90 $1.56 AUSTRALIA 1.80 1.24 JAPAN (INCLUDING OKINAWA) 1.73 1.25 AUSTRIA 1.72 1.23 KOREA, REPUBLIC OF 2.16 1.52 BAHAMAS 1.37 1.10 NETHERLANDS 1.57 1.02 BELGIUM 1.84 1.18 NIGERIA, FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF 2.33 1.84 BERMUDA 1.48 1.23 PAKISTAN 4.92 3.23 BRAZIL 2.19 1.60 PANAMA, REPUBLIC OF 2.09 1.60 CHILE 2.08 1.63 PERU 2.37 1.66 CHINA, PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF 3.10 2.40 PHILIPPINES 2.59 1.74 COLOMBIA 2.22 1.62 POLAND, REPUBLIC OF 1.88 1.51 COSTA RICA 1.96 1.46 PORTUGAL (INCLUDING AZORES 1.96
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/99socc.pdf
  • 1999 Interstate Message Toll Telephone Rates (Five and Ten Minute Calls) Between NEW YORK CITY, NY and SAN FRANCISCO and LOS ANGELES, CA CHICAGO, IL PHILADELPHIA, PA Day Evening Night/Weekend Day Evening Night/Weekend Day Evening Night/Weekend Dec 31 Five Ten Five Ten Five Ten Five Ten Five Ten Five Ten Five Ten Five Ten Five Ten 1984 AT&T 2.53 4.83 1.52 2.90 1.01 1.93 2.18 4.18 1.31 2.51 0.87 1.67 1.94 3.69 1.16 2.21 0.78 1.48 MCI 2.31 4.47 1.40 2.73 0.94 1.82 1.97 3.84 1.23 2.40 0.82 1.60 1.68 3.33 1.04 2.05 0.68 1.34 Sprint 2.39 4.61 1.39 2.69 0.94 1.81 2.06 3.98 1.26 2.43 0.83 1.61 1.80 3.49 1.08 2.09 0.71 1.36 1985 AT&T 2.33 4.43 1.40 2.66 0.93
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fcc97303.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fcc97303.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fcc97303.wp
  • record of all possible exposure locations is not necessary, but, for example, the "worst case" exposure value in an accessible area could be mentioned as showing that no exposures would ever be greater than that level. Reference should be given to the actual FCC exposure limit or limits relevant for the particular transmitting site. 206See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.17 and 1.52. 62 Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-303 (3) An explanation as to what, if any, restrictions on access to certain areas will be maintained to ensure compliance with the public or occupational exposure limits. This includes control procedures that are established for workers who may be exposed as a result of maintenance or other tasks related to their jobs. (4) A
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1999/da992172.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1999/da992172.txt
  • of approximately $5 million. AT&T has also said that it would need to make an additional $5 million investment to make the High Seas Service Y2K compliant. 9. AT&T has provided sufficiently detailed information for us to conclude that AT&T will be unduly financially burdened if AT&T is required to continue providing High Seas Service. We note that under section 1.52 of the Commission's rules, the signature of an applicant, or its lawyer, on a pleading constitutes its verification that the matters asserted in it are true. Hoxeng has not provided us with any reason to believe that AT&T has been untruthful in asserting that it is losing $5 million annually on High Seas Service. 10. In his Stay Motion, Hoxeng
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1999/fcc99051.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1999/fcc99051.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1999/fcc99051.wp
  • ITC-214-19981118-00820 and ITC-214-19980930-00689, Order, Authorization and Certificate, DA 98-2654 (rel. Jan. 4, 1999). 37 Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-51 that petitions to deny applications for international Section 214 authorizations are often filed based on arguments that have been specifically rejected by the Commission with the apparent intent of removing the application from streamlined review. Cable & Wireless recognizes that Section 1.52 of the Commission's rules addresses frivolous pleadings filed in Commission proceedings and provides that the Commission can strike such pleadings, issue forfeitures, or seek disciplinary action against the attorneys involved. The Commission issued a public notice in February 1996 reminding parties of Section 1.52 and stating that the Commission intends to fully utilize its authority to discourage and deter frivolous
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9024.pdf
  • AOR-W, and 2) Inmarsat-3 satellite at 15.5 WL in AOR-E and 54 WL in AOR-W to Inmarsat Ltd.-3 satellite at 15.5 WL in AOR-E and 54 WL in AOR-W. LOCATION: 41 � 27 ' 6.00 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 2120 RIVER RD., NEW HAVEN, SOUTHBURY, CT 73 � 17 ' 23.00 " W LONG. COMSAT LABS ANTENNA ID:1 1.52 meters 10K5G1E 77.00 dBW 6417.5000 - 6443.0000 MHz 600HG1D 0.00 dBW 4192.5000 - 4200.0000 MHz 1K20G1D 0.00 dBW 4192.5000 - 4200.0000 MHz 2K40G1D 0.00 dBW 4192.5000 - 4200.0000 MHz 4K80G1D 0.00 dBW 4192.5000 - 4200.0000 MHz 10K5G1E 0.00 dBW 4192.5000 - 4200.0000 MHz 600HG1D 0.00 dBW 3600.0000 - 3623.0000 MHz 1K20G1D 0.00 dBW 3600.0000 - 3623.0000 MHz 2K40G1D 0.00 dBW
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9073.pdf
  • Mobile Satellite Service Amendment to its pending application to reflect INMARSAT's relocation of the INMARSAT-2 F-2 (or INMARSAT Ltd.-2 ) satellite from 55 W.L. to 98 W.L. in AOR-W. LOCATION: 41 � 27 ' 6.00 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 2120 RIVER RD., NEW HAVEN, SOUTHBURY, CT 73 � 17 ' 23.00 " W LONG. COMSAT LABS ANTENNA ID:1 1.52 meters 10K5G1E 77.00 dBW 6417.5000 - 6443.0000 MHz 600HG1D 0.00 dBW 4192.5000 - 4200.0000 MHz 1K20G1D 0.00 dBW 4192.5000 - 4200.0000 MHz 2K40G1D 0.00 dBW 4192.5000 - 4200.0000 MHz 4K80G1D 0.00 dBW 4192.5000 - 4200.0000 MHz 10K5G1E 0.00 dBW 4192.5000 - 4200.0000 MHz Page 7 of 17 600HG1D 0.00 dBW 3600.0000 - 3623.0000 MHz 1K20G1D 0.00 dBW 3600.0000 - 3623.0000
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9219.pdf
  • MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Application for Modification Nature of Service:International Fixed Satellite Service "MOD" to add additional emission designator (2M20G1D) & frequency band (6454.4-6456.6 MHz). LOCATION: 41 � 27 ' 6.00 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 2120 RIVER RD., NEW HAVEN, SOUTHBURY, CT 73 � 17 ' 23.00 " W LONG. COMSAT LABS ANTENNA ID:1 1.52 meters 24K0F3E 77.00 dBW 6417.5000 - 6443.0000 MHz 600HG1D 77.00 dBW 6417.5000 - 6443.0000 MHz 1K20G1D 77.00 dBW 6417.5000 - 6443.0000 MHz 1K20G1D 77.00 dBW 6417.5000 - 6443.0000 MHz 2K40G1D 77.00 dBW 6417.5000 - 6443.0000 MHz 10K5G1E 77.00 dBW 6417.5000 - 6443.0000 MHz 600HG1D 4192.5000 - 4200.0000 MHz 1K20G1D 4192.5000 - 4200.0000 MHz 2K40G1D 4192.5000 - 4200.0000 MHz 4K80G1D 4192.5000
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0121.pdf
  • Satellite Service Amendment filed pursuant to the requirements of Section 621 and 624 of the Orbit Act. See FCC Order, DA 00-74, released April 3, 2000. 41 � 27 ' 6.00 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 2120 RIVER RD., NEW HAVEN, SOUTHBURY, CT 73 � 17 ' 23.00 " W LONG. LOCATION: Page 11 of 34 COMSAT LABS 1 1.52 meters ANTENNA ID: 77.00 dBW 6417.5000 - 6443.0000 MHz 24K0F3E 77.00 dBW 6417.5000 - 6443.0000 MHz 600HG1D 77.00 dBW 6417.5000 - 6443.0000 MHz 1K20G1D 77.00 dBW 6417.5000 - 6443.0000 MHz 1K20G1D 77.00 dBW 6417.5000 - 6443.0000 MHz 2K40G1D 77.00 dBW 6417.5000 - 6443.0000 MHz 10K5G1E 4192.5000 - 4200.0000 MHz 600HG1D 4192.5000 - 4200.0000 MHz 1K20G1D 4192.5000 - 4200.0000 MHz 2K40G1D
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1999/da992582.doc
  • of Filings. All filings made in this proceeding will be available for examination by interested parties during regular business hours in the Commission's Public Reference Room at its Headquarters, Washington, D. C. Although petitioner's request was signed, he failed to include an affidavit verifying that the statements contained in the petition were accurate to the best of his knowledge. Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules requires that the original of any document filed with the Commission by a party not represented by counsel shall be signed and verified by the party and his/her address stated. In the absence of such verification, the petition may be dismissed. Section 1.401(b) of the Commission's Rules concerning rule making proceedings places petitioners on notice that
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2000/da000646.doc
  • filings made in this proceeding will be available for examination by interested parties during regular business hours in the Commission's Public Reference Room at its headquarters, 445 Twelfth Street, SW, Washington, D. C 20554. Ashcraft's request was verified by its technical consultant. Although a petitioner may seek assistance in the preparation of a pleading or petition for rule making, Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules requires that the original of any document filed with the Commission by a party not represented by counsel, be signed and verified by the commenting or petitioning party and his/her address stated. In the absence of such verification, the petition may be dismissed. Section 1.401(b) of the Commission's Rules concerning rule making proceedings places petitioners on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2000/da001216.doc
  • examination by interested parties during regular business hours in the Commission's Reference Center (Room CY-A257) at its headquarters, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. Although petitioner's request indicates that the original copy of his proposal was signed, petitioner failed to include an affidavit verifying that the statements contained in his petition were accurate to the best of his knowledge. Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules requires that the original of any document filed with the Commission by a party not represented by counsel must be signed and verified by the party and his/her address stated. In absence of such verification, the petition may be dismissed. Section 1.401(b) of the Commission's Rules concerning rule making proceedings places petitioners on notice that their
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2000/da001217.doc
  • examination by interested parties during regular business hours in the Commission's Reference Center (Room CY-A257) at its headquarters, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. Although petitioner's request indicates that the original copy of his proposal was signed, petitioner failed to include an affidavit verifying that the statements contained in his petition were accurate to the best of his knowledge. Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules requires that the original of any document filed with the Commission by a party not represented by counsel must be signed and verified by the party and his/her address stated. In the absence of such verification, the petition may be dismissed. Section 1.401(b) of the Commission's Rules concerning rule making proceedings places petitioners on notice that
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2000/da001518.doc
  • Regulations, an original and four copies of all comments, reply comments, pleadings, briefs, or other documents shall be furnished the Commission. 6. Public Inspection of Filings. All filings made in this proceeding will be available for examination by interested parties during regular business hours in the Commission's Reference Information Center, at its headquarters, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules requires that all pleadings filed by parties not represented by legal counsel must be signed and verified by the petitioner and provide the petitioner's mailing address. In this case, the petition was signed by Jose J. Arzuaga, Jr. (``Arzuaga''), stating that he is a consulting radio and TV engineer and verifying that the calculations and exhibits
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2000/da001570.doc
  • Regulations, an original and four copies of all comments, reply comments, pleadings, briefs, or other documents shall be furnished the Commission. 6. Public Inspection of Filings. All filings made in this proceeding will be available for examination by interested parties during regular business hours in the Commission's Reference Information Center, at its headquarters, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules requires that all pleadings filed by parties not represented by legal counsel be signed and verified by the petitioner and provide the petitioner's mailing address. In this case, petitioner signed the request but failed to include an affidavit verifying that the statements contained in his petitioner were accurate to the best of his knowledge. We recognize
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/da000025.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/da000025.txt
  • representative of Newport, as permitted by Section 1.22, and will not ask Media Services to show its authority to so act. Moreover, Section 1.21(a), cited by Murray as a basis for dismissing the petition, is not mandatory. It states that ``any party may appear before the Commission in person or by an attorney. [emphasis added]'' Second, we recognize that Section 1.52 requires that a party not represented by a qualified attorney shall sign and verify the original of any petition filed with the Commission. Here, Newport is the party and has neither signed nor verified its reconsideration request. However, Newport's representative, Media Services, signed the pleading, and Section 1.429(h) specifically exempts reconsideration petitions in FM and TV allotment rulemaking proceedings from
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/da000649.doc
  • was also filed in this proceeding by Barry P. Lunderville ("Lunderville") requesting the allotment of Channel 229A to Milan, New Hampshire, as the community's first local aural service. However, Lunderville's counterproposal is not acceptable for consideration herein because he failed to include affidavits verifying that the statements contained in his counterproposal were accurate to the best of his knowledge. Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules requires that the original of any document filed with the Commission by a party not represented by counsel shall be signed and verified by the party and his/her address stated. In the absence of such verification, the petition may be dismissed. Further, Section 1.420(b) of the Commission's Rules places petitioners on notice that their proposal must
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/da000830.doc
  • Scheuerle, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 418-2180. Questions related to the application filing process for Channel 267A at Madisonvile, Texas, should be addressed to the Audio Services Division, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 418-2700. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION John A. Karousos Chief, Allocations Branch Policy and Rules Division Mass Media Bureau As requested in the Notice, Hunt complied with the requirements of Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules by verifying that the information contained in its petition for rule making is true to the best of its knowledge and belief. The coordinates for Channel 267A at Madisonville are 31-01-20 NL and 95-55-00 WL. Sunburst Media, L.P. filed a petition requesting the reallotment of Channel 241C2 from Madisonville to College Station, Texas. See 14 FCC
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/da000833.doc
  • 1999, Rept. No. 2329. The counterproposal filed by Barry P. Lunderville ("Lunderville") requests the allotment of Channel 247A to Newry, Maine, as the community's first local aural service. However, Lunderville's counterproposal is not acceptable for consideration herein because he failed to include affidavits verifying that the statements contained in his counterproposal were accurate to the best of his knowledge. Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules requires that the original of any document filed with the Commission by a party not represented by counsel shall be signed and verified by the party and his/her address stated. In the absence of such verification, the petition may be dismissed. Further, Section 1.420(b) of the Commission's Rules places petitioners on notice that their proposal must
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/da000920.doc
  • first local transmission service in the context of MM Docket No. 99-76. See 14 FCC Rcd 4071 (1999). Channel 296C was subsequently allotted to Bayfield. See 14 FCC Rcd 21502 (1999). 3 Petitioner refiled its comments after the record closed in this proceeding to substitute its original signature for the facsimile signature submitted earlier. Pursuant to the provisions of � 1.52 of the Commission's Rules, the facsimile signature of an attorney or unrepresented party is acceptable for filing providing the signatory retains the original document until the Commission's decision is final and no longer subject to judicial review. Public Notice of the counterproposal was given March 8, 2000 (Report No. 2393). The distance between Teec Nos Pos, Arizona and Bayfield, Colorado,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/da001156.doc
  • to apply for the channel, if allotted. Comments and a counterproposal were also filed by Barry P. Lunderville ("Lunderville") requesting the allotment of Channel 256A to Northumberland, New Hampshire, as its first local aural service, stating his intention to apply for the channel, if allotted. 2. As an initial matter, we recognize that Lunderville's counterproposal did not comply with Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules by including an affidavit verifying that the statements contained in his counterproposal were accurate to the best of his knowledge. Section 1.52 requires that the original of any document filed with the Commission by a party not represented by counsel shall be signed and verified by the party and his/her address stated. In the absence of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/da001208.doc
  • of LaBelle and Everglades City from having their own local radio stations and that the application of Toccoa Falls College for a non-commercial station on Channel 202 at LaBelle is an inferior service when compared to the existing service provided to LaBelle from Station WWWD. InterMart argues that Reisings's petition for rule making was not verified as required by Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules and should be dismissed. InterMart states that should the Commission ignore its rules and consider Reising's proposal, InterMart's proposal to reallot Channel 223C3 from LaBelle to Estero should be preferred over an allotment at Everglades City as Everglades City should be deemed a "quiet village" and no channel should be allotted to it. According to InterMart,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/da001245.doc
  • Policy and Rules Division Mass Media Bureau The community of Lincoln has been added to the caption. Lunderville originally filed its request for Channel 254A at Lincoln on March 15, 1999, after the adoption of the Notice herein, and later on May 10, 1999, as a counterproposal herein. However, in neither case did Lunderville comply with the requirements of Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules which require that the original of any document filed with the Commission by a party not represented by counsel be signed and verified by the party and his/her address stated. In the absence of such verification, the petition may be dismissed. Further, Section 1.420(b) of the Commission's Rules places petitioners on notice that their proposal must
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/da002206.doc
  • FURTHER ORDERED, That this proceeding IS TERMINATED. 6. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact Pam Blumenthal, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 418-1600. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Barbara A. Kreisman Chief, Video Services Division Mass Media Bureau As stated in the Notice, petitioner's request, although signed, failed to include an affidavit verifying the statements contained in his petition, as required by Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules. Petitioner was requested to correct this deficiency in his responsive comments, and has complied accordingly by filing an affidavit. Petitioner is also now represented by counsel. Specifically, Channel 51 states that since WCTV-TV transmitter site (and Thomasville) are both less than 125 kilometers from Mariana, the first-adjacent DTV Channel 52 allotment for WCTV(TV) would greatly limit
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/da993040.doc
  • entire loss area will continue to be well-served in that the population within the loss area will receive fulltime aural service from anywhere between seven and sixteen fulltime aural services. 3. MBI, licensee of FM Station WNCS, Montpelier, Vermont, argues that petitioner's request should not be accepted for consideration because it failed to comply with the verification requirements of Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules and did not provide complete gain and loss and reception data upon parties could base their response. Rather, it states that parties will be required to await the reply comment period before responding to the complete request of the petitioner. However, should the Commission not dismiss the rule making, MBI states that the public interest would
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Orders/1997/fcc97050.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Orders/1997/fcc97050.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Orders/1997/fcc97050.wp
  • (including petitions for other forms of relief) and responsive pleadings for Commission consideration must comply with section 27.207 and must: (1)Identify the application or applications (including applicant's name, station location, Commission file numbers and radio service involved) with which it is concerned; (2)Be filed in accordance with the pleading limitations, filing periods, and other applicable provisions of sections 1.41 through 1.52 of this chapter except where otherwise provided in section 27.207; (3)Contain specific allegations of fact which, except for facts of which official notice may be taken, shall be supported by affidavit of a person or persons with personal knowledge thereof, and which shall be sufficient to demonstrate that the petitioner (or respondent) is a party in interest and that a
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Notices/1997/fcc97113.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Notices/1997/fcc97113.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Notices/1997/fcc97113.wp
  • Sandberg, "U.S. Households with Internet Access Doubled to 14.7 Million in Past Year," Wall Street Journal, October 21, 1996, at B11. 12 See footnote 2, supra, and & 10, infra. 13 See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. '' 1.49, 1.419. 14 47 C.F.R. ' 1.419(b). 15 If the Commission decides to do so, other rules may need to be modified, including Rule 1.52, 47 C.F.R. ' 1.52. See also & 20, infra. III. DISCUSSION A. Formal Status of Electronically Filed Comments 8. An estimated 40 million people in the United States now have access to the global Internet, and that number is growing rapidly.11 Allowing parties to use the Internet and other forms of electronic transmission to file comments in FCC rulemaking proceedings
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1998/fcc98056.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1998/fcc98056.wp
  • the public has had experience with the ECFS system, we anticipate adding other types of pleadings and documents to the electronic filing system and moving toward an all- electronic filing system. K In the Notice, we observed that if we extended the ECFS to proceedings other than rulemaking proceedings, we might have to amend the signature rule, 47 C.F.R. � 1.52, which requires that "[t]he original of all petitions, motions, pleadings, briefs, and other documents filed" FCC 98-56 Federal Communications Commission 30 12 FCC Rcd at 5154 n.15, citing 47 C.F.R. � 1.52. 31 See 47 C.F.R. � 1.429(h). 32 PCIA Comments at 3. 33 Bell Atlantic/NYNEX Comments at 4; Ameritech Comments at 2. We address security concerns infra at ��
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Comments/fcc98055/210020-2.pdf
  • they engage in such abuse. CEMA therefore urges the Commission to establish a standing requirement for complaints under Section 255, in order to preserve the integrity of the complaint process, Additionally, CEMA encourages the Commission to impose sanctions on parties who file frivolous Section 255 complaints before the Commission or its staff.37 A pleading may be deemed frivolous under Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. $ 1.52, if there is no "good ground to support it' or if it is "interposed for delay."`*Without a standing requirement, there are no safeguards against the filing of frivolous complaints under Section 255. B. The Commission Should Establish A Time Limit For The Filing Of A Complaint Under Section 255. In the NPRM,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.wp
  • requirement). 1.49 Specifications as to pleadings and documents (change to 1.49 allow electronic filing of pleadings and other documents via ULS and to delete microfiche requirements). 1.50 Specifications as to briefs (add specifications for briefs 1.50 filed via ULS). 1.51 Number of copies of pleadings, briefs, and other papers 1.51(f) (eliminate provision requiring extra copies for pleadings filed via ULS). 1.52 Subscription and verification (change to allow electronic 1.52 versions of pleadings and other documents via ULS to be acceptable for filing). 1.83(b) Applications for radio operator licenses (change 1.83(b) organizational name from Private Radio Bureau to Licensing and Technical Analysis Branch, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division). 1.85 Suspensions of operator licenses (change organizational 1.85 name from Private Radio Bureau
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da001415.doc
  • Reconsideration Letters relate to the Goodman/Chan matter. 2. None of the Reconsideration Letters complies with our procedural requirements for the filing of petitions for reconsideration. In particular, none of the Reconsideration Letters was filed with the Secretary of the Commission, as required by section 1.106(i) of the Commission's rules. Additionally, none of the Reconsideration Letters complies with sections 1.51(c)(2) and 1.52, thereby further failing to satisfy the requirements of section 1.106(i). 3. Moreover, the Commission has considered all of the various Goodman/Chan-related issues in several orders addressing numerous previous requests for relief filed in Goodman/Chan and related cases. All of the issues raised in the Reconsideration Letters have been resolved by these orders, and petitioners present no new arguments or facts
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da001416.doc
  • and 1.115(f) of the Commission's rules. Additionally, most of the AFR Letters appear not to comply with the requirements in sections 1.106(f) and 1.115(d), respectively, that petitions for reconsideration and applications for review be filed within 30 days of public notice of the action for which review is sought. Moreover, none of the AFR Letters complies with sections 1.51(a)(2) and 1.52, thereby further failing to satisfy the respective requirements of sections 1.106(h) and 1.115(f). Accordingly, we dismiss all of the AFR Letters for failure to comply with the Commission's procedural rules. Section 1.106(b)(3) of the Commission's rules provides an additional basis for dismissing the AFR Letters listed in Appendix B. The Commission dismissed or denied previous applications for review filed by
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00055.doc
  • Exhibit B, Letter from Alfred N. Koplin, Hinsdale Management Corporation, to concerned parties (March 13, 1996). Gencom, Inc. v. FCC, 832 F.2d 171, 181 (D.C. Cir. 1987). Application of Wine Country Radio, 11 FCC Rcd 2333, 2334 �6 (1996) (citing Johnson v. United States, 628 F.2d 187 (D.C. Cir. 1980)). Application at 7. 47 C.F.R. � 1.16. 47 C.F.R. � 1.52. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.17. Swan Creek Communications v. FCC, 39 F.3d 1217, 1222 (D.C. Cir. 1994). See 18 U.S.C. � 1001. Quatron Opposition at 6-7; O'Hare Opposition at 6-7. 47 C.F.R. � 90.157(a) (emphasis added). 47 C.F.R. 90.157(a). Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-55 Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-55 � � ) 9 W � � b a b c
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1997/d970886d.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1997/d970886d.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1997/d970886d.wp
  • in a pending application. See 47 C.F.R. 1.65. An applicant that fails to submit the required FCC Form 600 application by May 12, 1997, and fails to establish good cause for any late-filed submissions, shall be deemed to have defaulted and will be subject to the default payments set forth in 47 C.F.R. 27.203. Frivolous Pleadings Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. 1.52, the Commission reminds parties to our proceedings and their attorneys that the Commission intends to fully utilize its authority to discourage and deter the filing of frivolous pleadings. See Public Notice, "Commission Taking Tough Measures Against Frivolous Pleadings," FCC 96-42 (rel. Feb. 9, 1996). Organization of Application and Exhibits Main Form and Schedule A The FCC Form 600 Main Form
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/da980572.pdf
  • or manual filers applying for multiple licenses are not required to submit a separate application for each market if all filing requirements associated with the application are identical except for the market designator, channel block, and market name. Under these circumstances, applicants may submit one FCC Form 601 Main Form and Schedule B. Frivolous Pleadings Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.52, the Commission reminds parties to our proceedings and their attorneys that the Commission intends to fully use its authority to discourage and deter the filing of frivolous pleadings. See Public Notice, "Commission Taking Tough Measures Against Frivolous Pleadings," FCC 96-42 (rel. Feb. 9, 1996). D-2 Organization of Application Main Form The FCC Form 601 Main Form should be completed in
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/da982143.pdf
  • or manual filers applying for multiple licenses are not required to submit a separate application for each market if all filing requirements associated with the application are identical except for the market designator, channel block, and market name. Under these circumstances, applicants may submit one FCC Form 601 Main Form and Schedule B. Frivolous Pleadings Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.52, the Commission reminds parties to our proceedings and their attorneys that the Commission intends to fully use its authority to discourage and deter the filing of frivolous pleadings. See Public Notice, "Commission Taking Tough Measures Against Frivolous Pleadings," 11 FCC Rcd. 3030 (1996). D-2 Organization of Application Main Form The FCC Form 601 Main Form should be completed in its
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
  • 22.4 18.93 14.17 17.67 17.8 Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-118 C-32 Metric Metric September October November December January Notes Number Full Name VZ CLE C VZ CLE C VZ CLE C VZ CLE C VZ CLE C 2-Wire Digital Services - Maintenance MR-2 � Trouble Report Rate MR-2-02- 3341 Network Trouble Report Rate - Loop 0.3 1.33 0.31 1.45 0.79 1.52 0.9 0.62 0.83 0.97 MR-2-03- 3341 Network Trouble Report Rate - Central Office 0.17 0.26 0.14 0.47 0.09 0.1 0.08 0.23 0.09 0.29 MR-2-04- 3341 % Subsequent Reports 27.41 26.09 27.72 14.29 15.19 11.11 17.5 20 MR-3 � Missed Repair Appointments MR-3-01- 3341 % Missed Repair Appointment � Loop 35.83 10.53 41.97 15.25 8.68 3.33 9.71 0 8.55 5.41 MR-3-02-
• http://www.fcc.gov/Forms/Form854/854.pdf
  • heliports. (b) 50 to 1 for a horizontal distance of 3.05 kilometers (10,000 feet) from the nearest point of the nearest runway of each airport as specified in paragraph 3(a, b, c, and d) below with its longest runway no more than 0.98 kilometers (3,200 feet) in actual length, excluding heliports. (c) 25 to 1 for a horizontal distance of 1.52 kilometers (5,000 feet) from the nearest point of the nearest landing and takeoff area of each heliport specified in paragraph 3(a, b, c, and d) below. NOTE: Applicants can access the FCC's TOWAIR program via the Antenna Homepage on the Internet (http://wireless.fcc.gov/antenna) for assistance in determining if a proposed construction or alteration meets the above criteria. 3) Any construction of
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-3442A1.html
  • of frivolousness, and the Commission, like federal courts, forbids such improper submissions.11 Consequently, we urge DDA and its counsel to act in accordance with this prohibition in the future.7. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED th at, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i), 154(j), 208, and sections 1.52, 1.115(d), and 1.711-1.736 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.52, 1.115(d), 1.711-1.736, and authority delegated by sections 0.111, and 0.311 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.111, 0.311, the filings of DDA referenced herein ARE DISMISSED, and the proceeding is TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Radhika V. Karmarkar Deputy Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 1 For administrative convenience,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1889A1.html
  • 9 Id. 10 FCC 05M-13 (rel. Mar. 17, 2005). 11 See.Judge's Ex. 2. 12 Id. at 1-2. 13 Id. at 4. 14 See Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 05M-16 (rel. Mar. 30, 2005) (``MO&O''). 15 Specifically, the MO&O concluded that the Show Cause Reply and its submission to the Presiding Judge were in violation of sections 0.401, 1.7, 1.47, 1.51(a)(1), 1.52, 1.209, 1.211, 1.291(a)(4), and 1.296 of the Commission's Rules. Id. at 2, 4. 16 Id. 17 Id. at 2, 5. 18 Id. at 2, n.2. 19 Id. at 3. 20 See Judge's Ex. 3. 21 Id. at 1. As noted above, the Media Bureau canceled the license for Station K216EQ on May 9, 2005. 22 See Dismissal Order, note 4
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4340A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4340A1.pdf
  • to deny''). Id. See also, Secret Communications II, LLC, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 9139 (2003); Heidi Damsky, Order, 13 FCC Rcd 16352 (1998); Pikes Peak Broadcasting Co., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 4626 (1997). Furthermore, Blanchard did not sign or provide her address with her informal objection, rendering it procedurally defective under 47 C.F.R. �� 1.52, 73.3587. 47 U.S.C. � 309(k). Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 October 19, 2007 = > 8 9 ; = > ? I L U n } � � � � � � �%���PNG �` �` b``D� 4 �&)�@�-�@�@�7 H >��O��� p j�� �2�=��k��� �"_� - J��, �Nt�Rb �7�P���U�ZS '��wp��ˈ jP�T{.|�87w]�g��yA�Ҩ-��=T#�O> �#W p����U�^S� �t�''�TxNt�l ۦ��X6`T{������:�r�� �A�R\ )]h]e�M8�I̟`�?K^��� ?C��A�UU �3ꡟ=��A �
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4382A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4382A1.pdf
  • a petition for reconsideration ``and any supplement thereto'' must be filed within 30 days of public notice of the action for which reconsideration is sought. Hammond's Supplement was filed more than four months late. The Supplement is accompanied by a ``Motion to Accept Supplement to Petition for Reconsideration.'' It supplies the verification of the Petition required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.52 for pleadings not submitted by an attorney and makes additional arguments in support of the Petition. Because the Petition was timely filed and the Supplement presents new facts not occurring until after the petition deadline, the Motion is granted and the Supplement accepted. Letter to from Peter H. Doyle, Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau to Terry Keith Hammond, Reference 1800B3
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1372A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1372A1.pdf
  • Letter, 22 FCC Rcd 18600 (MB 2007), petition for recon. pending (``Toole Decision''). Objection at 2. Id. Id. Opposition at 3-4. Memorandum Opinion and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 15464 (1996) (``Greater Muskegon Broadcasters''). Id. at 15472 (emphasis added). See, e.g., 47 U.S.C. � 309(d); 47 C.F.R. �� 1.17, 1.41 - 1.77, 73.3584, 73.3587, 73.5006, 73.7004. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. �� 1.52, 73.3584(b). Coleman Objection, first unnumbered page. Id., second unnumbered page. Id., second-third unnumbered pages. See 47 U.S.C. � 310(d); Dorothy J. Owens, Debtor-in-Possession, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 5 FCC Rcd 6615 (1990). Cf. Policy Regarding Character Qualifications in Broadcast Licensing, Report, Order and Policy Statement, 102 FCC 2d 1179, 1223-25 (1986) (there should be no presumption that misconduct at one
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1844A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1844A1.pdf
  • from Jose A. Ribas Dominicci, informing the Commission that ``no such person'' existed at that address. Arsuante's copy returned unopened with ``No Such Number'' stamped on the envelope. III. DISCUSSION 8. Procedural Issues. Subscription and Verification. Petitioners or their representing attorneys must ``sign and verify'' all petitions submitted to the Commission for review and ``state [their] address'' pursuant to Section 1.52 of the Rules. Documents signed with ``intent to defeat the purpose of [Section 1.52] . . . may be stricken as sham and false, and the matter may proceed as though the document had not been filed.'' However, the staff may still consider a petition's merits even when it is dismissed for failure to conform to Commission rules and procedures.
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-57A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-57A1.pdf
  • Smith,'' filed an unsigned letter objecting to the Application, making numerous allegations. On August 1, 2008, counsel for ICR filed a declaration made under penalty of perjury dated July 31, 2008, provided to her by Smith stating that he ``did not submit or authorize the submission of the letter, and [he asks] that the letter be dismissed.'' Pursuant to Sections 1.52 and 73.3587 of Rules, the original copy of informal objections ``shall'' be signed. Accordingly, we also dismiss the unsigned Smith Objection as procedurally defective. Conclusion/Actions. Based on the record before us, we conclude that ICR is qualified to hold an NCE-FM authorization and grant of the Application would serve the public interest, convenience and necessity. The terms of the grant
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-628A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-628A1.pdf
  • Lewis' Objection as a petition to deny. We will, however, treat the Objection as an informal objection pursuant to Section 73.3587 of the Rules. Other Procedural Defects. Applicants allege that Lewis' pleading contains additional procedural defects. We agree. While Lewis asserts that ``[a]ll Commission copies were signed,'' the pleading received by the Commission is not signed as required by Section 1.52 of the Rules. Moreover, Lewis fails to provide an affidavit to support the allegations made in the Petition, as required by Section 309(d)(1) of the Act. The Commission cannot waive this statutory requirement. Accordingly, for these reasons too, we dismiss Lewis' Objection as a petition to deny. As noted above, we will, however, treat the pleading as an informal objection
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1948A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1948A1.pdf
  • documentation while not treating HSARG's established local applicant documentation with the same scrutiny. In its Opposition, HSARG argues that its documentation was in fact sufficient. In its Reply, MBMC's restates the arguments in the Petition and also seeks dismissal of the Opposition due to a procedural defect, namely, that it is allegedly not signed and verified as required by Section 1.52 of the Rules. Discussion. Petition for Reconsideration. Reconsideration is warranted only if the petitioner sets forth an error of fact or law, or presents new facts or changed circumstances which raise substantial or material questions of fact that otherwise warrant reconsideration of the prior action. Furthermore, the Bureau has the authority to dismiss or deny petitions for reconsideration of actions
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-2A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-2A1.pdf
  • (71) 2009 1.94 1.94 1.66 (38) (46) (83) Contour Measure 2005 2.31 2.80 3.03 (45) (30) (24) 2007 2.05 2.76 2.71 (45) (38) (46) 2009 1.50 1.81 2.07 * (56) (48) (63) Miscellaneous Format Market Measure 2005 3.03 2.51 1.34 (8) (5) (6) 2007 4.54 6.17 4.32 (35) (25) (41) 2009 3.94 4.27 3.43 (51) (44) (79) Contour Measure 2005 1.52 1.77 4.43 (8) (6) (5) 2007 3.46 5.44 * 5.64 * (34) (27) (40) 2009 2.68 3.33 4.75 * (47) (49) (78) * - difference between the category mean and the mean of the No LPFM category is statistically different from zero using a two-sided unpaired t-test at the 95 percent level of confidence. Numbers in parentheses are the number
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-03-201A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-03-201A1.pdf
  • a condition of receipt requires greater financial accountability from applicants, thus serving the public interest objectives of 47 U.S.C. � 309(j)). In Closed Broadcast Auction No. 25, for example, only 14 petitions to deny or informal objections were filed against the 94 long-form applications filed by winning bidders. Our Rules prohibit filing frivolous petitions to deny. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.52. Further, it is Commission policy to investigate legitimate claims of abuse of process, and to take appropriate enforcement action when warranted. See, e.g., Public Notice, ``Commission Takes Tough Measures Against Frivolous Pleadings,'' 11 FCC Rcd 3030 (1996). See also ConQuest Operator Services Corp., 14 FCC Rcd 12518, 12523-24 and n.32 (1999) (parties ``are under the obligation to be truthful and
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-06-163A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-06-163A1.pdf
  • H. Dortch Secretary APPENDIX A Rule Changes Part 1 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended to read as follows: 1. Section 1.401 is amended by revising paragraphs (b) and (d) to read as follows: � 1.401 Petitions for rule making. ***** (b) The petition for rule making shall conform to the requirements of �� 1.49, 1.52, and 1.419(b) (or � 1.420(e), if applicable), and shall be submitted or addressed to the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 20554, or may be submitted electronically. ***** (d) . . . Petitions to amend the FM Table of Allotments must be accompanied by the appropriate construction permit application and payment of the appropriate application filing fee. 2. Section 1.420
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/pd/pf/csreport_2000.pdf
  • 0.45 0.30 1.43 1.11 7 20 23 n.a . 21India 1,839 5,920 0 7,759 280 0.31 0.46 1.40 1.77 6 21 20 23 29Argentina 1,041 6,347 151 7,539 8,467 0.16 0.22 0.46 0.76 7 22 17 13 12Philippines 3,862 3,647 2 7,511 1,567 1.06 1.59 2.17 3.42 6 23 21 28 27Colombia 1,699 5,452 142 7,293 7,526 0.30 0.58 1.26 1.52 8 24 n.a . n.a . n.a .New Zealand 827 6,225 31 7,083 124 0.13 0.90 2.16 1.83 6 25 18 16 16Venezuela 1,890 4,896 180 6,966 1,065 0.37 0.70 1.31 1.49 7 26 29 21 24Malaysia 613 5,942 0 6,555 128 0.10 0.25 0.37 0.37 1 27 19 n.a . n.a .Denmark 1,258 763 4,410 6,431 657 0.24 0.46
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/peer_review/prlpfm_rpt_economic_study.pdf
  • (71) 2009 1.94 1.94 1.66 (38) (46) (83) Contour Measure 2005 2.31 2.80 3.03 (45) (30) (24) 2007 2.05 2.76 2.71 (45) (38) (46) 2009 1.50 1.81 2.07 * (56) (48) (63) Miscellaneous Format Market Measure 2005 3.03 2.51 1.34 (8) (5) (6) 2007 4.54 6.17 4.32 (35) (25) (41) 2009 3.94 4.27 3.43 (51) (44) (79) Contour Measure 2005 1.52 1.77 4.43 (8) (6) (5) 2007 3.46 5.44 * 5.64 * (34) (27) (40) 2009 2.68 3.33 4.75 * (47) (49) (78) * -difference between the category mean and the mean of the No LPFM category is statistically different from zero usinga two-sided unpaired t-test at the 95 percent level of confidence. Numbers in parentheses are the number of observations
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/materials/already-released/consumer090002.pdf
  • CHR/NR 9 0.14 Classic AOR(CL AOR) 151 2.76 CHR/U 56 0.89 Ethnic (E) 16 0.29 CL 70 1.11 Easy Listening (EZ) 2 0.04 CL AOR 284 4.5 EZ/New Age Contemp. (NAC) 1 0.02 CL HITS 83 1.31 EZ/SAC 3 0.05 E 14 0.22 FS 202 3.69 EZ 13 0.21 FS/T 41 0.75 EZ/SAC 1 0.02 G 55 1 FS 96 1.52 G/B 1 0.02 FS/T 81 1.28 Jazz (J) 59 1.08 G 62 0.98 News (N) 37 0.68 J 118 1.87 News/Talk (N/T) 161 2.94 KIDS 1 0.02 NAC/AOR 2 0.04 N 75 1.19 O 352 6.43 N/T 170 2.69 Religious (REL) 200 3.65 O 394 6.24 Soft Adult Contemp. (SAC) 379 6.92 REL 276 4.37 SP 172 3.14 SAC 253
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/napoli-stmt.pdf
  • with the relationship between market conditions and public affairs programming, and involves an analysis of the broadcast schedules for 111 commercial television stations during a two week time period in January of 2000. As Table Four indicates, television stations owned locally aired an average of .85 hours of local public affairs programming during this two week time period, compared with 1.52 hours for stations not locally owned. These results approach, but do not achieve, accepted levels of statistical significance. 13 Table 4 Means Comparison: Local Public Affairs Programming (N = 111). Station Type Local Public Affairs Programming HoursS.D. N Local Owner 1.52 3.1136 Non-Local Owner .85 1.9775 Note: F = 1.902; p = .17 Table Five presents the results of a
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-c.pdf
  • 45.7 Sports 2.9 2.1 1.0 3.0 2.7 1.0 Talk 6.0 6.1 1.7 7.0 8.0 2.2 Talk/Classic AOR 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.0 Talk/Full Service 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Talk/Jazz 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 Unknown 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 34 Table 2 Per-Market Averages 1. All 244 Markets 1993 1997 Stations 21.39 24.55 Black-Targeted 1.52 1.93 Black-Owned 0.65 0.55 Hispanic-Targeted 0.68 1.07 Hispanic-Owned 0.19 0.28 AQH Listening 16.80 15.78 Formats 11.48 14.88 Owners 18.65 14.92 HHI 1269.83 2091.66 Population (000) 685.18 707.74 Black Population 84.32 Hispanic Population 69.54 2. 73 Markets with Black Listening Data in both Years 1993 1997 Stations 25.33 28.01 Black-Targeted 3.53 4.26 Black-Owned 1.60 1.36 Non-Black AQH Listening 16.71 15.67 Black
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/echostar-directv/national_ehxib.pdf
  • levels . . . should be based on a theory that takes into account the many other phenomena that make industries differ in terms of the likelihood of tacit collusion." Franklin M. Fisher (1991), INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, ECONOMICS, AND THE LAW, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 202�203. 79. U.S. Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission, HORIZONTAL MERGER GUIDELINES, at � 1.52 (revised Apr. 8, 1997). 80. U.S. Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission, HORIZONTAL MERGER GUIDELINES, at � 2.0 (revised Apr. 8, 1997). 81. The Analytical Structure is developed in: Iwata, G. (1974), Measurement of Conjectural Variations in Oligopoly, ECONOMETRICA, vol. 42, pp. 949-966; Gollop and Roberts (1979), Firm Interdependence in Oligopolistic Markets, JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, vol. 10 pp. 313-331;
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/intelsat-comsat/lrt_mot072202.pdf
  • to Unsigned Pleadings The Order at footnote 13 includes a statement by the Commission concerning LRT�s alleged failures to comply with its rules. The statement is in error. The Commission states as follows: �LRT has ignored procedural requirements in our rules, including subscription and verification requirements and page limits. Some pleadings filed by LRT are unsigned. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.52 (2001). This statement, based on Comsat�s allegations, is erroneous. LRT did not ignore the Commission�s rules. All of LRT�s pleadings were properly signed. Conformed copies (unsigned) were forwarded to Comsat/Lockheed, a fact used as the basis of the companies� unsupported allegation against LRT. Furthermore, while LRT pleadings did exceed page limitations, in each and every case, as noted by the