FCC Web Documents citing 1.59

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-87A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-87A5.txt
  • n/a n/a 2.59 n/a Italy 1.54 1.51 1.00 2.52 2.47 1.60 n/a n/a 2.30 Ireland n/a 2.20 1.00 n/a 4.15 1.60 n/a 5.18 2.26 Luxembourg n/a 2.01 2.25 n/a 2.01 2.25 n/a 2.01 2.25 Netherlands 2.00 1.17 1.00 2.00 1.60 1.41 2.52 2.06 1.70 Portugal n/a 1.20 0.99 n/a 2.37 1.63 n/a 18.00 2.58 Spain 1.51 1.49 0.99 1.51 1.49 1.59 4.22 4.17 3.07 Sweden 1.68 1.14 0.86 2.15 1.77 1.16 2.98 2.41 1.59 U.K. 0.64 0.61 0.62 0.91 0.87 0.90 1.74 1.69 1.27 Attachment 4 EU interconnection rates U.S. Cents per minute at peak rates Local Single Transit Double Transit 1997 1998 1999 1997 1998 1999 1997 1998 1999 Country Austria 8.36 2.00 1.91 8.36 2.00 1.91 9.24 2.63 2.52
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2925A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2925A2.txt
  • 2000 2.52 3.14 (0.62) December 2000 3.03 4.74 (1.71) December 2000 2.88 3.87 (0.99) January 2001 2.33 4.15 (1.82) January 2001 2.54 3.56 (1.02) February 2001 3.25 3.74 (0.49) February 2001 2.42 3.13 (0.71) March 2001 3.42 3.36 0.06 March 2001 2.44 3.01 (0.57) Oklahoma March 2001 1.68 3.69 (2.01) March 2001 2.29 2.83 (0.54) Kansas March 2001 1.97 3.56 (1.59) March 2001 2.78 3.13 (0.35) Performance Measure Differences Attachment A-7 Objective VIII, Procedure 3 8 Performance Measurement No. 6 Time from PIC change request to implementation (Measured in terms of percentage implemented within each successive 6 hour period, until 95% completed) Texas BOC & Affiliates Non-Affiliates Variance Period Period July 1 ñ September 30, 2000 Dallas 7-12 hours July 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A4.txt
  • Sports 29 Sports-related 20 Sports 30 Syndicated 21 Syndicated 31 TalkShow 22 TalkShow 32 Teamvs.Team 20 Sports 33 TVMovie 23 TVMovie Source:TMSandauthordecisions.SeeAppendixAfordefinitionsofTMSProgramTypes. 32 Table4:DistributionofProgramTypesandCategoriesintheEstimationDataset ProgramTypeNumber ShareCategory Number Share ArtsSci 273 0.18ActionAdv 5,397 3.63 Business 786 0.53Adult 3,898 2.62 Cartoon 5,091 3.42Animated 6,498 4.37 Children 6,356 4.27Anthol 534 0.36 DaytimeSoap 961 0.65ArtsSci 2,857 1.92 GameShow 1,441 0.97Business 1,453 0.98 Health 2,370 1.59Children 920 0.62 Hobbies 10,237 6.88Comedy 4,764 3.20 Infomercial 6,042 4.06Community 1,231 0.83 Instructional 3,811 2.56Documentary 2,235 1.50 Miniseries 352 0.24Drama 13,622 9.16 Movie 11,078 7.45Educational 13,090 8.80 Music 2,999 2.02Entertainment 2,800 1.88 NetworkSeries 20,919 14.07Fantasy 952 0.64 News 1,610 1.08French 159 0.11 Other 8,333 5.60GameShow 501 0.34 Pelicula 941 0.63Health 2,181 1.47 PublicAffairs 3,240 2.18History 170 0.11 Religious 5,704 3.84Hobbies
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A5.txt
  • by MCC Radio (Morris Communications), which also owns the Topeka Capital-Journal, with circulation of about 64,000; and WBNS-FM (Columbus, OH) is owned by RadiOhio, Inc. which is part of the Dispatch Printing Co., which also owns The Columbus Dispatch, with circulation of about 350,000. II - 19 cross-owned with an in-market TV station aired about 59% more news (exp(0.46) = 1.59) than their counterparts. At the same time, however, such a cross-ownership arrangement decreased the odds that a station aired news by a factor of 0.56 (exp(-0.58) = 0.56). These effects imply that a radio station cross-owned with an in-market TV station is less likely to air news, but if it does air some news the quantity will be relatively larger
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • -0.8221 (1.37) -0.0057 (1.35) 2.4257* (2.53) -0.0354 (-0.14) 0.000096* (2.64) 0.0589161 Percent Sports, AM Drive -0.1603 (0.39) 0.0017 (0.58) -0.8116 (-1.23) 0.0064 (0.04) -0.000064*(-2.56) 0.0673161 Percent News, Evening 0.1985 (1.44) 0.0008 (0.83) 0.2831 (1.18) -0.1233*(-2.42) 0.000000 (-0.05) 0.0883164 Average Block, Entertainment/Leisure/DJ Banter, AM Drive -15.6691*(2.06) -0.0675 (1.25) 34.1562* (2.80) -3.8290 (-1.20) 0.000841 (1.82) 0.0474161 Average Block, Music, Evening -9.6674*(1.99) -0.0551 (1.59) -8.9634 (-1.06) -0.7137 (-0.40) -0.000015 (-0.05) -0.0375164 Average Block, News, Evening 2.7455 (1.70) 0.0054 (0.47) 5.4568 (1.94) -1.2399*(-2.08) -0.000011 (-0.11) 0.0409164 Average Block, Sports, Evening 13.6651*(2.50) 0.0743 (1.91) 0.6487 (0.07) -2.4003 (-1.19) -0.000611 (-1.80) 0.0366164 Note: Asterisk denotes statistical significance at least at the 5 percent level. Each row summarizes the results of a single regression model. See Table 17a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1852A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1852A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1852A1.txt
  • the Forbearance Procedures Order on August 6, 2009. Accordingly, the following rules adopted in the Forbearance Procedures Order will take effect on September 8, 2009: § 1.55 Public notice of petitions for forbearance. § 1.56 Motions for summary denial of petitions for forbearance. § 1.57 Circulation and voting of petitions for forbearance. § 1.58 Forbearance petition quiet period prohibition. § 1.59 Withdrawal or narrowing of petitions for forbearance. As noted, the Forbearance Procedures Order also contains a new rule that specifies filing requirements for forbearance petitions. The rule contains new information collection requirements that are subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), Public Law No. 104-13. The information collection is being submitted to the Office of Management and Budget
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1348A1_Rcd.pdf
  • 2.052 748Swaziland 752Sweden 9.363 756Switzerland 1.787 760Syrian Arab Republic 26.544 762Tajikistan 1.087 764Thailand 17.598 807The former Yugoslav Republic of Mac 22.848 626Timor-Leste 0.53 768Togo 274.38 776Tonga 1.393 780Trinidad and Tobago 5.079 788Tunisia 0.707 792Turkey 1.104 795Turkmenistan 800Uganda 794.308 804Ukraine 1.982 784United Arab Emirates 826United Kingdom 0.651 834United Republic of Tanzania 521.6 840United States 1 858Uruguay 16.588 860Uzbekistan 548Vanuatu 69.307 862Venezuela 1.59 704Viet Nam 6520.248 887Yemen 114.001 894Zambia 3216.006 Source United Nations Statistics Millennium Indicators. 12018 Federal Communications Commission DA 10-1348 APPENDIX D: Demographics Dataset 12019 Federal Communications Commission DA 10-1348 Community % Households with broadband Population Total Population density (avg population per square meter) GDP total (US$m), PPP (puchashing power parity) GDP per cap, PPP (purchasing power parity) Education (% of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1348A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1348A2.txt
  • 2.052 748Swaziland 752Sweden 9.363 756Switzerland 1.787 760Syrian Arab Republic 26.544 762Tajikistan 1.087 764Thailand 17.598 807The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia 22.848 626Timor-Leste 0.53 768Togo 274.38 776Tonga 1.393 780Trinidad and Tobago 5.079 788Tunisia 0.707 792Turkey 1.104 795Turkmenistan 800Uganda 794.308 804Ukraine 1.982 784United Arab Emirates 826United Kingdom 0.651 834United Republic of Tanzania 521.6 840United States 1 858Uruguay 16.588 860Uzbekistan 548Vanuatu 69.307 862Venezuela 1.59 704Viet Nam 6520.248 887Yemen 114.001 894Zambia 3216.006 Source United Nations Statistics Millennium Indicators.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2027A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2027A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2027A1.txt
  • the statutory criteria for forbearance. On November 14, 2011, Telispire submitted a request to withdraw its petition for forbearance and requested that the Commission dismiss its petition without prejudice. We grant the request to dismiss the petition and do not address the merits of Telispire's forbearance request or the comments filed in opposition. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.59(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.59(b), and the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request to withdraw the petition of Zefcom, LLC d/b/a Telispire PCS IS GRANTED and that the petition for forbearance filed on January 13, 2011 IS DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-284A1.txt
  • 0.73 137 $32.46 1.15 $30.48 0.94 2008 140 $46.03 0.64 $33.46 0.75 $30.41 0.85 137 $33.72 1.14 $33.56 1.01 Second operator subgroup (incumbents) 2009 70 $43.10 0.86 $36.34 0.74 $35.38 0.82 70 $30.87 1.10 $34.77 1.08 2008 70 $45.87 0.61 $36.27 0.75 $33.54 0.98 70 $34.34 1.25 $38.07 1.13 Second operator subgroup (rivals) 2009 70 $45.84 2.37 $19.69 2.41 $15.97 1.59 67 $40.25 4.06 $9.36 1.54 2008 70 $46.76 2.33 $20.18 2.38 $15.63 1.55 67 $30.68 2.75 $11.36 2.19 DBS subgroup 2009 207 $44.47 1.01 $33.79 0.89 $32.28 0.90 207 $23.21 0.85 $29.27 0.91 2008 207 $43.74 0.62 $31.04 0.52 $29.05 0.51 207 $22.86 0.80 $28.78 0.83 Wireless MVPD subgroup 2009 31 $54.25 0.92 $33.87 0.48 $29.16 0.52 31 $35.54 1.59
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-540A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-540A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-540A1.txt
  • and that if Airvoice subsequently seeks forbearance for the purpose of becoming an ETC or seeks designation as such, we expect that Airvoice will notify the relevant commission of its decision here to withdraw its petition for forbearance and explain with specificity the change of circumstances that warrant any such request by Airvoice. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.59(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.59(b), and the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request to withdraw the petition of Airvoice Wireless, LLC IS GRANTED and that the petition for forbearance filed on December 1, 2010 IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-732A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-732A3.txt
  • data is from OECD. Federal Communications Commission DA 11-732 2007 2008 2009 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2004 2005 21070056 21429366 2.61 2.65 2.69 2.74 2.78 631769.45 666878.05 6904942 6984172 8.37 8.43 8.51 8.62 8.72 210276.96 220744.57 5221310 5313823 21.89 22.18 22.53 22.94 23.35 163102.14 168762.94 4195981 4293915 2.25 2.30 2.36 2.42 2.48 113143.74 123064.28 1585794 1603361 1.56 1.58 1.59 1.61 1.63 44892.29 45696.50 2112967 2171197 0.78 0.80 0.81 0.83 0.86 67044.09 73255.00 493204 497529 7.11 7.16 7.21 7.26 7.33 12546.21 13165.21 214804 219818 0.15 0.15 0.16 0.16 0.16 7438.47 8208.27 341054 345551 139.39 140.53 142.21 145.17 147.08 13325.55 13981.29 8282984 8318592 8355260 97.44 98.19 98.74 99.14 99.33 266408.34 274801.22 280062 281185 283118 75.36 75.74 70.67 70.86 70.98 6205.24 6264.86
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-848A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-848A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-848A1.txt
  • ``intends to supplement its original demonstration of the burden justifying forbearance at a future date, but it cannot gather the needed information within the time frame of its current forbearance petition.'' Given the particular circumstances surrounding NTCH's petition and its request to withdraw, we grant the request and dismiss the petition without prejudice. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.59(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.59(b), and the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request to withdraw the petition of NTCH, Inc. and NTCH-West Tenn, Inc. IS GRANTED and that the petition for forbearance filed on March 5, 2010 IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.txt
  • 2.87 2.28 2.17 * (69) (57) (104) 2009 2.23 1.49 * 1.53 * (76) (54) (116) Contour Measure 2005 2.04 2.17 2.40 (108) (64) (42) 2007 2.31 2.46 2.51 (98) (73) (59) 2009 1.70 1.76 1.77 (103) (68) (75) Religion Format Market Measure 2005 2.14 1.65 1.30 * (55) (41) (52) 2007 1.53 1.85 1.33 (39) (32) (62) 2009 1.18 1.59 0.88 (34) (36) (57) Contour Measure 2005 1.70 1.55 1.93 (73) (42) (33) 2007 1.19 1.51 1.95 * (53) (40) (40) 2009 0.88 1.22 1.46 * (53) (31) (43) Table 11 (continued) Average Full-Service Commercial FM Stations' Revenue per Adult by Format Year No LPFM One LPFM Two or More LPFM News/Talk/Sports Format Market Measure 2005 3.02 2.35 2.46 (35)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • 2,160 Iowa Telecom 0.81 0.00 0.84 0.15 2.90 134 185 331 Qwest 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.18 1.47 21,018 39,686 61,107 SBC 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.21 1.30 64,610 92,623 158,985 Sprint 0.03 0.00 0.63 0.17 1.68 10,375 15,681 26,235 Verizon 0.20 0.00 0.44 0.21 1.54 58,300 131,143 190,087 Price Caps 0.07 0.00 0.45 0.21 1.42 186,646 342,940 530,987 NECA 1.00 1.40 1.59 1.43 8.62 16,085 17,824 17,354 All Price Caps and NECA 0.15¢ 0.07¢ 0.48¢ 0.24¢ 1.71¢ 202,731 360,764 548,341 Source: Access tariff filings. 2/ Non-traffic sensitive charges include charges assessed on a per-month, per-unit basis. Prior to 07/01/94 these charges were included in the average traffic- sensitive rates. 3/ The total charge per conversation minute consists of charges on the originating
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228584A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228584A3.txt
  • 0.14 0.18 0.49 0.28 3 17 19 14 14Switzerland 4,586 20,842 0 25,428 1,711 0.22 0.45 0.30 1.43 6 18 14 9 11Hong Kong 2,783 15,166 3,193 21,142 8,113 0.15 0.11 0.11 0.26 1 19 26 20 n.a .India 1,993 10,888 0 12,881 1,555 0.18 0.40 0.46 1.40 7 20 20 19 13Philippines 6,588 5,675 2 12,265 3,611 1.16 1.11 1.59 2.17 6 21 22 n.a . n.a .New Zealand 1,786 3,418 6,110 11,314 2,642 0.19 0.13 1.63 2.16 7 22 23 21 16Venezuela 2,016 5,157 3,855 11,028 20,536 0.22 0.38 0.70 1.31 6 23 21 24 28Colombia 2,566 5,079 2,941 10,586 1,592 0.32 0.31 0.58 1.26 8 24 27 26 n.a .Malaysia 810 7,456 630 8,896 2,368 0.10 0.15 0.25
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-242532A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-242532A8.txt
  • 42,929 0.22 0.11 0.09 0.24 7 18 15 15 15Taiwan 2,201 27,413 1 29,615 14,811 0.08 0.06 0.12 0.29 1 19 14 11 8France 13,738 5,778 7,561 27,077 6,581 1.03 0.38 0.29 0.51 7 20 19 26 20India 3,529 23,029 0 26,558 3,121 0.15 0.18 0.40 0.46 7 21 20 20 19Philippines 10,642 8,814 634 20,090 10,754 1.13 1.16 1.11 1.59 6 22 23 21 24Colombia 4,008 6,851 5,220 16,079 2,911 0.33 0.32 0.31 0.58 6 23 22 23 21Venezuela 3,086 5,886 3,717 12,689 20,365 0.32 0.22 0.38 0.70 8 24 21 22 n.a.New Zealand 2,630 3,912 4,095 10,637 2,136 0.33 0.19 0.13 1.63 4 25 n.a. n.a. 27Dominican Republic 3,266 1,643 4,032 8,941 5,846 0.58 2.14 2.15 2.94 7 26
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.txt
  • of from Billed to Revenues from Revenues Minutes Revenues Foreign Minutes Foreign RevenuesForeign Foreign for all U.S. 4/ Carriers Carriers 6/ Carriers Carriers and Foreign Minutes 1964 20.2 $62.9 $30.3 $32.6 12.0 $19.6 $3.11 $1.50 $1.62 $1.63 $1.62 1965 25.5 78.2 37.2 41.1 15.4 24.7 3.07 1.46 1.61 1.60 1.61 1966 32.3 100.1 47.6 52.5 18.9 30.1 3.10 1.47 1.63 1.59 1.61 1967 39.7 114.2 54.6 59.6 23.4 31.8 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46.4 126.9 61.5 65.4 28.2 40.0 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 64.6 172.0 82.7 89.4 38.3 51.6 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81.1 196.6 98.9 97.7 51.0 59.8 2.43 1.22 1.21 1.17 1.19 1971 100.9 237.4 120.7 116.6 68.4 75.1 2.35 1.20 1.16 1.10
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.txt
  • Revenues of from Billed to Revenues from Revenues Minutes RevenuesForeign Minutes Foreign RevenuesForeign Foreign for all U.S. 4/ Carriers Carriers 6/ Carriers Carriers and Foreign Minutes 1964 20.2 $62.9 $30.3 $32.6 12.0 $19.6 $3.11 $1.50 $1.62 $1.63 $1.62 1965 25.5 78.2 37.2 41.1 15.4 24.7 3.07 1.46 1.61 1.60 1.61 1966 32.3 100.1 47.6 52.5 18.9 30.1 3.10 1.47 1.63 1.59 1.61 1967 39.7 114.2 54.6 59.6 23.4 31.8 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46.4 126.9 61.5 65.4 28.2 40.0 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 64.6 172.0 82.7 89.4 38.3 51.6 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81.1 196.6 98.9 97.7 51.0 59.8 2.43 1.22 1.21 1.17 1.19 1971 100.9 237.4 120.7 116.6 68.4 75.1 2.35 1.20 1.16 1.10
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • to ARMIS (Report 43-01) is based on USF loops. USF Loops 1/ Year End 1 - 47 Table 1.18 Information for Allocating Incumbent Local Exchange Revenues: 2003 (Dollars in Millions) Revenues Interstate for Total Allocation Revenues Alabama $1,106 1.78% $1,050 $16 $1,200 $86 Alaska NA NA NA NA NA NA American Samoa NA NA NA NA NA NA Arizona 986 1.59 937 14 1,070 77 Arkansas 571 0.92 542 8 619 45 California 6,145 9.88 5,837 89 6,667 480 Colorado 1,149 1.85 1,092 17 1,247 90 Connecticut 809 1.30 768 12 877 63 Delaware 175 0.28 166 3 190 14 District of Columbia 349 0.56 331 5 378 27 Florida 4,041 6.50 3,839 59 4,384 315 Georgia 2,382 3.83 2,263 35
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A3.txt
  • to ARMIS (Report 43-01) is based on USF loops. USF Loops 1/ Year End 1 - 47 Table 1.18 Information for Allocating Incumbent Local Exchange Revenues: 2003 (Dollars in Millions) Revenues Interstate for Total Allocation Revenues Alabama $1,106 1.78% $1,050 $16 $1,200 $86 Alaska NA NA NA NA NA NA American Samoa NA NA NA NA NA NA Arizona 986 1.59 937 14 1,070 77 Arkansas 571 0.92 542 8 619 45 California 6,145 9.88 5,837 89 6,667 480 Colorado 1,149 1.85 1,092 17 1,247 90 Connecticut 809 1.30 768 12 877 63 Delaware 175 0.28 166 3 190 14 District of Columbia 349 0.56 331 5 378 27 Florida 4,041 6.50 3,839 59 4,384 315 Georgia 2,382 3.83 2,263 35
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • TELEPHONE CO. (DEFIANCE) 1.76 -2.67 4.54 2.35 351150 A DIXON TEL. CO. 11.02 -3.17 14.65 61.71 351152 A DUMONT TEL. CO. 4.60 -9.59 15.69 61.80 351153 A DUNKERTON TEL. COOP., INC. 12.94 -1.15 14.25 66.22 351156 C EAST BUCHANAN TEL. COOP. 13.45 -0.30 13.80 21.76 351157 A ELLSWORTH COOP. TEL. ASSN. 4.45 -2.13 6.72 11.08 351158 C MINBURN TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 1.59 -9.85 12.70 26.61 351160 A FARMERS & BUSINESSMEN'S TEL. CO. 30.43 16.21 12.23 72.86 351162 A FARMERS COOP. TEL. CO.-DYSART 14.45 0.39 14.00 66.35 351166 A FARMERS & MERCHANTS MUTUAL TEL. CO. 11.94 -2.12 14.36 69.59 351167 C IOWA TELECOMM. SVCS. DBA IOWA TELECOM-NORTH -4.55 -2.65 -1.95 0.00 351168 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOP TEL CO- HARLAN 1.73 -2.10 3.90 0.87
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • and coal products 324,568.3 871.1 0.27 0.14 325 Chemical products 519,460.4 1,006.3 0.19 0.16 326 Plastics and rubber products 191,591.4 2,297.0 1.20 0.36 327 Nonmetallic mineral products 98,577.5 1,291.2 1.31 0.20 331 Primary metals 174,729.2 1,270.4 0.73 0.20 332 Fabricated metal products 260,534.1 5,641.4 2.17 0.87 333 Machinery 277,545.9 195.4 0.07 0.03 334 Computer and electronic products 387,241.3 10,238.8 2.64 1.59 335 Electrical equipment, appliances, and components 101,826.4 4,040.8 3.97 0.63 3361MVMotor vehicles, bodies and trailers, and parts 487,938.7 105.8 0.02 0.02 3364OTOther transportation equipment 173,337.4 1.8 0.00 0.00 337 Furniture and related products 78,213.7 131.8 0.17 0.02 339 Miscellaneous manufacturing 135,922.7 215.9 0.16 0.03 42 Wholesale trade 1,011,981.6 4,462.8 0.44 0.69 44RT Retail trade 1,138,896.6 256.4 0.02 0.04 481 Air
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • New York 23,303,950 5.55 2,001 2,615 North Carolina 13,503,157 3.21 1,160 1,515 North Dakota 973,429 0.23 84 109 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA Ohio 13,760,686 3.27 1,182 1,544 Oklahoma 5,232,871 1.25 449 587 Oregon 5,507,327 1.31 473 618 Pennsylvania 17,145,532 4.08 1,472 1,924 Puerto Rico 3,232,275 0.77 278 363 Rhode Island 1,321,925 0.31 114 148 South Carolina 6,667,116 1.59 573 748 South Dakota 1,082,229 0.26 93 121 Tennessee 8,158,156 1.94 701 915 Texas 25,858,875 6.15 2,220 2,901 Utah 3,075,292 0.73 264 345 Vermont 1,404,008 0.33 121 158 Virginia 12,967,395 3.09 1,114 1,455 Virgin Islands NA NA NA NA Washington 9,220,135 2.19 792 1,034 West Virginia 3,421,974 0.81 294 384 Wisconsin 7,051,270 1.68 605 791 Wyoming 1,091,803 0.26 94 122
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A3.txt
  • New York 23,303,950 5.55 2,001 2,615 North Carolina 13,503,157 3.21 1,160 1,515 North Dakota 973,429 0.23 84 109 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA Ohio 13,760,686 3.27 1,182 1,544 Oklahoma 5,232,871 1.25 449 587 Oregon 5,507,327 1.31 473 618 Pennsylvania 17,145,532 4.08 1,472 1,924 Puerto Rico 3,232,275 0.77 278 363 Rhode Island 1,321,925 0.31 114 148 South Carolina 6,667,116 1.59 573 748 South Dakota 1,082,229 0.26 93 121 Tennessee 8,158,156 1.94 701 915 Texas 25,858,875 6.15 2,220 2,901 Utah 3,075,292 0.73 264 345 Vermont 1,404,008 0.33 121 158 Virginia 12,967,395 3.09 1,114 1,455 Virgin Islands NA NA NA NA Washington 9,220,135 2.19 792 1,034 West Virginia 3,421,974 0.81 294 384 Wisconsin 7,051,270 1.68 605 791 Wyoming 1,091,803 0.26 94 122
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • 0.72 -5.97 7.12 14.11 TENNESSEE -0.11 -3.75 3.79 1.41 TEXAS -0.01 -3.73 3.86 2.84 UTAH -3.16 -3.17 0.01 1.27 VERMONT 2.78 -1.74 4.60 4.30 VIRGIN ISLANDS -8.51 -0.38 -8.16 -25.01 VIRGINIA -2.55 -4.00 1.51 5.88 WASHINGTON -2.40 -3.04 0.66 -4.19 WEST VIRGINIA 5.59 -1.57 7.27 11.00 WISCONSIN -0.24 -4.22 4.16 -0.86 WYOMING -5.81 -2.33 -3.56 -17.59 GRAND TOTAL -2.62 -4.14 1.59 2.47 * Percentage changes from 2005 to 2006. Source: Calculated from National Exchange Carrier Association data. Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* NTS Revenue of Requirement Projections in Unseparated High Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment 3 - 30 Table 3.19 State or Jurisdiction 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 ALABAMA 669,940,042 725,835,191 747,265,108 776,864,426 790,346,242 ALASKA 180,391,482 186,752,252
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 #06/30/01 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/03 06/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44 07/01/04 06/30/05 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.25 1.53 07/01/05 06/30/06 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.25 1.59 * # Source: Access tariff filings. Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did not take effect until August 11, 2000. From This table shows average rates (weighted by minutes of use) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269872A1.pdf
  • Rules (``Rules'') by failing to exhibit all red obstruction lighting on antenna structure # 1059331 from sunset to sunrise. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), that Roy is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of ten thousand dollars ($10,000). BACKGROUND Antenna structure #1059331 is located on County Highway 553, 1.59 miles south of Bark River, Michigan. The structure is 145.9 meters (479 feet) in height above ground. Station WMGX, which is licensed to Escanaba License Corp. (``Escanaba''), transmits from the top of the structure. According to the antenna structure registration, the structure is required to have ``Obstruction Marking and Lighting'' in accordance with paragraphs 3, 4, 5, and 13 of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/03 06/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44 07/01/04 06/30/05 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.25 1.53 07/01/05 06/30/06 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.25 1.59 07/01/06 06/30/07 0.01 0.00 0.54 0.25 1.63 Source: Access tariff filings. 4 Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did not take effect until August 11, 2000. 1 This table shows average rates (weighted by minutes of use) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • locations not estimated. 1 - 48 Table 1.20 Information for Allocating Mobile Wireless Revenues: 2005 Alabama 2,843 1.48% $1,147 $342 $1,225 $358 Alaska NA NA NA NA NA NA American Samoa NA NA NA NA NA NA Arizona 3,547 1.85 1,431 426 1,528 447 Arkansas 1,681 0.88 678 202 724 212 California 24,598 12.84 9,926 2,958 10,595 3,098 Colorado 3,053 1.59 1,232 367 1,315 385 Connecticut 2,332 1.22 941 280 1,004 294 Delaware 711 0.37 287 85 306 90 District of Columbia 747 0.39 301 90 322 94 Florida 12,578 6.57 5,075 1,512 5,418 1,584 Georgia 6,023 3.14 2,430 724 2,594 759 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 935 0.49 377 112 403 118 Idaho 777 0.41 314 93
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A3.txt
  • locations not estimated. 1 - 48 Table 1.20 Information for Allocating Mobile Wireless Revenues: 2005 Alabama 2,843 1.48% $1,147 $342 $1,225 $358 Alaska NA NA NA NA NA NA American Samoa NA NA NA NA NA NA Arizona 3,547 1.85 1,431 426 1,528 447 Arkansas 1,681 0.88 678 202 724 212 California 24,598 12.84 9,926 2,958 10,595 3,098 Colorado 3,053 1.59 1,232 367 1,315 385 Connecticut 2,332 1.22 941 280 1,004 294 Delaware 711 0.37 287 85 306 90 District of Columbia 747 0.39 301 90 322 94 Florida 12,578 6.57 5,075 1,512 5,418 1,584 Georgia 6,023 3.14 2,430 724 2,594 759 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 935 0.49 377 112 403 118 Idaho 777 0.41 314 93
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • ISLAND -4.26 -12.23 9.09 0.00 SOUTH CAROLINA 2.11 -4.65 7.09 0.08 SOUTH DAKOTA 1.97 -4.14 6.37 10.35 TENNESSEE 0.97 -3.18 4.28 5.94 TEXAS -1.05 -5.56 4.78 11.23 UTAH -1.90 -3.20 1.34 -11.61 VERMONT -2.12 -2.36 0.25 -2.94 VIRGIN ISLANDS 4.85 -0.68 5.56 8.87 VIRGINIA 2.84 -4.49 7.67 21.81 WASHINGTON -0.58 -4.68 4.30 17.91 WEST VIRGINIA -4.30 -2.74 -1.60 -31.61 WISCONSIN -1.59 -6.83 5.63 4.44 WYOMING -1.76 -5.40 3.85 4.13 GRAND TOTAL 2.35 -5.38 8.18 2.55 * Percentage changes from 2006 to 2007. Source: Calculated from National Exchange Carrier Association data. Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* NTS Revenue of Requirement Projections in Unseparated High Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment 3 - 31 Table 3.19 Unseparated ILEC Non-Traffic-Sensitive Revenue
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.txt
  • 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 #06/30/01 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/03 06/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44 07/01/04 06/30/05 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.25 1.53 07/01/05 06/30/06 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.25 1.59 07/01/06 06/30/07 0.01 0.00 0.54 0.25 1.63 * # Source: Access tariff filings. Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did not take effect until August 11, 2000. From This table shows average rates (weighted by minutes of use) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/03 06/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44 07/01/04 06/30/05 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.25 1.53 07/01/05 06/30/06 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.25 1.59 07/01/06 06/30/07 0.01 0.00 0.54 0.25 1.63 07/01/07 06/30/08 0.01 0.00 0.56 0.26 1.71 Source: Access tariff filings. Rates in Effect From To Sensitive per Switched Interstate Charges for Switched Access Service Minute 2 Traffic Sensitive per Switched Minute Non-Traffic Minute 1 Carrier Common Line per Terminating Access Minute 1 Carrier Common Line per Originating Access 4 Although the charges
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • care facilities 641,480.4 12,411.5 1.93 1.94 624 Social assistance 129,431.2 1,924.6 1.49 0.30 711AS Performing arts, spectator sports, museums, and related activities 85,475.0 778.1 0.91 0.12 713 Amusements, gambling, and recreation industries 120,540.4 1,359.6 1.13 0.21 721 Accommodation 123,704.9 2,319.7 1.88 0.36 722 Food services and drinking places 571,785.1 8,569.6 1.50 1.34 81 Other services, except government 709,867.8 10,164.1 1.43 1.59 GFE Federal government enterprises 95,862.0 550.9 0.57 0.09 GFG Federal general government 820,889.0 10,702.5 1.30 1.67 GSLE State and local government enterprises 215,337.4 1,649.8 0.77 0.26 GSLG State and local general government 1,594,339.4 22,877.8 1.43 3.57 F010 Personal consumption expenditures 9,224,507.6 209,153.1 2.27 F020 Private fixed investment 2,162,503.3 8,615.7 0.40 F030 Change in private inventories 46,652.4 0.0 0.00 F040 Exports
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • New York 20,565 5.45 1,725 2,312 North Carolina 11,880 3.15 997 1,336 North Dakota 827 0.22 69 93 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA Ohio 12,523 3.32 1,051 1,408 Oklahoma 4,225 1.12 354 475 Oregon 4,758 1.26 399 535 Pennsylvania 15,324 4.06 1,285 1,723 Puerto Rico 3,490 0.93 293 392 Rhode Island 994 0.26 83 112 South Carolina 6,015 1.59 505 676 South Dakota 979 0.26 82 110 Tennessee 7,652 2.03 642 860 Texas 23,426 6.21 1,965 2,633 Utah 2,848 0.75 239 320 Vermont 1,283 0.34 108 144 Virginia 11,346 3.01 952 1,276 Virgin Islands NA NA NA NA Washington 7,854 2.08 659 883 West Virginia 3,078 0.82 258 346 Wisconsin 6,294 1.67 528 708 Wyoming 997 0.26 84 112
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A3.pdf
  • New York 20,565 5.45 1,725 2,312 North Carolina 11,880 3.15 997 1,336 North Dakota 827 0.22 69 93 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA Ohio 12,523 3.32 1,051 1,408 Oklahoma 4,225 1.12 354 475 Oregon 4,758 1.26 399 535 Pennsylvania 15,324 4.06 1,285 1,723 Puerto Rico 3,490 0.93 293 392 Rhode Island 994 0.26 83 112 South Carolina 6,015 1.59 505 676 South Dakota 979 0.26 82 110 Tennessee 7,652 2.03 642 860 Texas 23,426 6.21 1,965 2,633 Utah 2,848 0.75 239 320 Vermont 1,283 0.34 108 144 Virginia 11,346 3.01 952 1,276 Virgin Islands NA NA NA NA Washington 7,854 2.08 659 883 West Virginia 3,078 0.82 258 346 Wisconsin 6,294 1.67 528 708 Wyoming 997 0.26 84 112
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A4.pdf
  • Hampshire 8.14 8.25 8.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.14 8.25 8.15 8.14 8.25 8.15 New Jersey 7.07 8.25 8.02 0.00 3.50 3.48 0.00 1.75 1.74 7.07 10.00 9.76 7.07 13.50 13.24 New Mexico 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 3.35 0.00 1.75 1.67 8.25 10.00 9.92 8.25 13.50 13.27 New York 5.93 8.25 8.02 0.00 3.50 3.17 0.00 1.75 1.59 5.93 10.00 9.60 5.93 13.50 12.78 North Carolina 7.43 8.25 7.88 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.18 10.00 9.63 12.68 13.50 13.13 North Dakota 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 1.64 0.00 1.75 0.82 8.25 10.00 9.07 8.25 13.50 10.71 N. Marianna Islands 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25 Ohio 6.99
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • 32.85 401710 A MAGAZINE TELEPHONE COMPANY 0.75 -2.02 2.83 0.37 401711 C CENTURYTEL OF MOUNTAIN HOME, INC. -2.67 -3.55 0.92 -6.10 401712 A MOUNTAIN VIEW TELEPHONE COMPANY -0.25 -0.51 0.26 -16.71 401713 C NORTHERN ARKANSAS TEL. CO.,INC. 1.40 -3.90 5.52 4.04 401718 C PRAIRIE GROVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 6.05 -0.46 6.54 11.82 401720 C CENTURYTEL OF REDFIELD, INC. -1.24 -6.68 5.83 1.59 401721 C RICE BELT TEL. CO.,INC. -8.59 -7.51 -1.17 -12.39 401722 A E. RITTER TELEPHONE COMPANY -0.47 -4.21 3.90 2.20 401724 C SOUTHWEST ARKANSAS TEL. COOP. INC. 5.19 -3.70 9.23 13.26 401726 C TRI-COUNTY TEL. CO. INC.-AR 6.59 -1.50 8.21 11.40 401727 C CENTURYTEL OF SOUTH ARKANSAS, INC. -4.12 -5.95 1.94 -4.73 401729 C WALNUT HILL TELEPHONE COMPANY 3.12 -4.77
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A8.pdf
  • Low-Income Households All Households 1984 to 1997 1997 to 2007 1984 to 1997 1997 to 2007 Ohio 1987 5.23 81.0% 88.5% 91.2% 7.5% * 2.8% 93.2% 95.0% 95.1% 1.8% 0.1% Oklahoma 1996 1.67 81.9% 78.9% 84.7% -3.0% 5.8% 91.0% 91.8% 93.1% 0.7% 1.4% Oregon 1986 5.21 76.4% 90.5% 93.1% 14.1% * 2.6% 91.4% 95.3% 97.1% 3.9% * 1.8% Pennsylvania 1996 1.59 85.6% 93.6% 91.3% 8.0% * -2.3% 94.4% 97.3% 96.3% 3.0% * -1.1% Rhode Island 1987 5.25 86.4% 87.6% 90.8% 1.2% 3.2% 94.0% 94.6% 95.8% 0.5% 1.2% South Carolina 1995 5.25 66.1% 76.2% 87.7% 10.1% * 11.5%* 85.1% 92.0% 91.7% 6.9% * -0.3% South Dakota 1988 0.37 84.6% 90.5% 93.8% 5.9% 3.3% 93.0% 94.7% 97.5% 1.7% 2.7% Tennessee 1992 4.77 71.1%
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.pdf
  • 3.82 01/01/9906/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/9912/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/0006/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/0006/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/0112/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/0206/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/0206/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/0306/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44 07/01/0406/30/05 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.25 1.53 07/01/0506/30/06 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.25 1.59 07/01/0606/30/07 0.01 0.00 0.54 0.25 1.63 07/01/0706/30/08 0.01 0.00 0.56 0.26 1.71 Source: Access tariff filings. Rates in Effect From To Sensitive per Switched Interstate Charges for Switched Access Service Minute 2 Traffic Sensitive per Switched Minute Non-Traffic Minute 1 Carrier Common Line per Terminating Access Minute 1 Carrier Common Line per Originating Access 4 Although the charges took effect
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292562A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292562A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292562A1.txt
  • seq.; 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(j), 160, 201, 225, and 303. 2. Section 1.49 is amended by adding paragraph (f)(1)(iv) to read as follows: § 1.49 Specifications as to pleadings and documents. (f)(1) (iv) Petition for forbearance proceedings. 3. Subpart A [Amended] Add undesignated center heading below § 1.52 to read as follows: Forbearance Proceedings 4. Add new §§ 1.54 through 1.59 as follows: § 1.54 Petitions for forbearance must be complete as filed. (a) Description of relief sought. Petitions for forbearance must identify the requested relief, including: (1) Each statutory provision, rule, or requirement from which forbearance is sought. (2) Each carrier, or group of carriers, for which forbearance is sought. (3) Each service for which forbearance is sought. (4) Each
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • Rhode Island 8.15 8.15 8.15 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.90 9.90 9.90 13.40 13.40 13.40 South Carolina 7.38 8.25 8.24 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.13 10.00 9.99 12.63 13.50 13.49 South Dakota 7.89 8.25 8.19 0.00 3.50 0.31 0.00 1.75 0.15 7.89 10.00 8.34 7.89 13.50 8.65 Tennessee 6.85 8.25 8.15 0.00 3.50 3.19 0.00 1.75 1.59 6.85 10.00 9.75 6.85 13.50 12.94 Texas 5.36 8.25 7.28 0.00 3.50 3.35 0.00 1.75 1.67 5.36 10.00 8.95 5.36 13.50 12.30 Utah 8.09 8.25 8.15 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.84 10.00 9.90 13.34 13.50 13.40 Vermont 8.15 8.25 8.17 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.90 10.00 9.92 13.40 13.50 13.42 Virgin Islands 8.25 8.25 8.25 3.50
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A4.txt
  • Rhode Island 8.15 8.15 8.15 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.90 9.90 9.90 13.40 13.40 13.40 South Carolina 7.38 8.25 8.24 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.13 10.00 9.99 12.63 13.50 13.49 South Dakota 7.89 8.25 8.19 0.00 3.50 0.31 0.00 1.75 0.15 7.89 10.00 8.34 7.89 13.50 8.65 Tennessee 6.85 8.25 8.15 0.00 3.50 3.19 0.00 1.75 1.59 6.85 10.00 9.75 6.85 13.50 12.94 Texas 5.36 8.25 7.28 0.00 3.50 3.35 0.00 1.75 1.67 5.36 10.00 8.95 5.36 13.50 12.30 Utah 8.09 8.25 8.15 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.84 10.00 9.90 13.34 13.50 13.40 Vermont 8.15 8.25 8.17 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.90 10.00 9.92 13.40 13.50 13.42 Virgin Islands 8.25 8.25 8.25 3.50
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • NEW PARIS TEL., INC. 0.76 -3.83 4.78 -2.49 320800 C NORTHWESTERN INDIANA TEL. CO., INC. 1.13 -4.25 5.62 0.00 320801 C CENTURYTEL OF ODON, INC. -4.99 -4.03 -1.00 -12.45 320807 C PERRY-SPENCER RURAL TEL. COOP., INC. DBA PSC 4.42 -1.58 6.10 5.32 320809 A COMM. CORP. OF SOUTHERN INDIANA -7.02 -4.34 -2.80 -35.71 320813 C PULASKI-WHITE RURAL TEL. COOP., INC. 1.59 -5.97 8.05 4.56 320815 C ROCHESTER TEL. CO., INC. 9.38 -5.34 15.55 47.17 320816 A S & W TEL. CO., INC. -15.49 -6.31 -9.80 -47.35 320818 C SMITHVILLE TEL. CO., INC. 6.59 -2.28 9.08 20.45 320819 C SOUTHEASTERN INDIANA RURAL TEL. COOP., INC. 6.65 -4.11 11.22 13.12 320825 C SUNMAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION 7.46 -1.92 9.56 14.18 320826 A SWAYZEE TEL.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.txt
  • 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/03 06/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44 07/01/04 06/30/05 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.25 1.53 07/01/05 06/30/06 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.25 1.59 07/01/06 06/30/07 0.01 0.00 0.54 0.25 1.63 07/01/07 06/30/08 0.01 0.00 0.56 0.26 1.71 07/01/08 06/30/09 0.01 0.00 0.63 0.24 1.77 07/01/09 06/30/10 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.26 1.85 Source: Access tariff filings. Rates in Effect From To Sensitive per Switched Interstate Charges for Switched Access Service Carrier Common Line per Originating Traffic Non-Traffic Carrier Common Line per Terminating Sensitive per
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.txt
  • 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/03 06/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44 07/01/04 06/30/05 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.25 1.53 07/01/05 06/30/06 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.25 1.59 07/01/06 06/30/07 0.01 0.00 0.54 0.25 1.63 07/01/07 06/30/08 0.01 0.00 0.56 0.26 1.71 07/01/08 06/30/09 0.01 0.00 0.63 0.24 1.80 07/01/09 06/30/10 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.26 1.85 Source: Access tariff filings. Rates in Effect From To Sensitive per Switched Interstate Charges for Switched Access Service Carrier Common Line per Originating Traffic Non-Traffic Carrier Common Line per Terminating Sensitive per
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
  • 0 291 265 718 0.88 Kentucky 177 77 0 418 385 1,058 1.30 Louisiana 196 77 0 488 400 1,160 1.43 Maine 58 33 0 122 131 344 0.42 Maryland 277 134 0 641 727 1,779 2.19 Massachusetts 282 250 0 704 613 1,849 2.28 Michigan 365 226 0 979 746 2,316 2.85 Minnesota 195 137 0 521 435 1,288 1.59 Mississippi 114 29 0 282 304 728 0.90 Missouri 254 82 0 605 628 1,569 1.93 Montana 52 16 0 90 117 275 0.34 Nebraska 57 47 0 182 169 455 0.56 Nevada 82 65 0 281 327 756 0.93 New Hampshire 56 54 0 131 155 395 0.49 New Jersey 421 302 0 980 1,010 2,714 3.34 New Mexico
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A3.txt
  • 0 291 265 718 0.88 Kentucky 177 77 0 418 385 1,058 1.30 Louisiana 196 77 0 488 400 1,160 1.43 Maine 58 33 0 122 131 344 0.42 Maryland 277 134 0 641 727 1,779 2.19 Massachusetts 282 250 0 704 613 1,849 2.28 Michigan 365 226 0 979 746 2,316 2.85 Minnesota 195 137 0 521 435 1,288 1.59 Mississippi 114 29 0 282 304 728 0.90 Missouri 254 82 0 605 628 1,569 1.93 Montana 52 16 0 90 117 275 0.34 Nebraska 57 47 0 182 169 455 0.56 Nevada 82 65 0 281 327 756 0.93 New Hampshire 56 54 0 131 155 395 0.49 New Jersey 421 302 0 980 1,010 2,714 3.34 New Mexico
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.txt
  • 2,574,679,349 16,947,9572,888,868,695 46,127,1363,135,612,366129,620,5343,152,615,875315,759,8083,168,575,065627,659,4013,143,188,367966,618,5483,112,131,4701,176,893,0363,007,823,3981,074,462,8603,018,231,4981,273,948,640 *See 2009 Universal Service Monitoring Report for 1999 - 2000 data. Table 3.15 Total High-Cost Support Payments By State or Jurisdiction - ILECs and CETCs * (Dollars) 2007 2004 2006 2005 2008 2001 2002 2003 2009 3 - 29 ALABAMA $0.49 $0.01 $0.00 $1.10 $0.00 $0.58 $0.43 $0.13 $2.73 ALASKA 7.44 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.20 0.00 1.59 21.29 AMERICAN SAMOA (0.00) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.94 0.00 2.58 9.53 ARIZONA 0.93 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.54 0.26 2.19 ARKANSAS 3.48 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.96 0.01 0.41 6.87 CALIFORNIA 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.17 0.02 0.49 COLORADO 1.27 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.84 0.66 0.17 2.94 CONNECTICUT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A9.txt
  • 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/03 06/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44 07/01/04 06/30/05 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.25 1.53 07/01/05 06/30/06 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.25 1.59 07/01/06 06/30/07 0.01 0.00 0.54 0.25 1.63 07/01/07 06/30/08 0.01 0.00 0.56 0.26 1.71 07/01/08 06/30/09 0.01 0.00 0.63 0.24 1.80 07/01/09 06/30/10 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.26 1.85 07/01/10 06/30/11 0.00 0.00 0.67 0.27 1.92 Source: Access tariff filings. Rates in Effect From To Sensitive per Switched Interstate Charges for Switched Access Service Carrier Common Line per Originating Traffic Non-Traffic
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305080A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305080A1.txt
  • 56.00 dBW Digital Video and Audio 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 2M00G7W 64.00 dBW Digital Video and Audio 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 36M0G7W Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) E110030 SES-LIC-20110308-00249 E Class of Station: Temporary Fixed Earth Station Application for Authority Brigham Young University EZ Nature of Service: Fixed Satellite Service SITE ID: BYUSNG1 LOCATION: Advent Communications B1.5M 1.59 meters ANTENNA ID: Flydrive 150 60.38 dBW 8PSK, digital video with assoc. digital audio 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 4M00G7F Points of Communication: BYUSNG1 - PERMITTED LIST - () E090029 SES-MOD-20110131-00073 E Class of Station: Mobile Earth Station Application for Modification COMTECH MOBILE DATACOM CORP. Nature of Service: Mobile Satellite Service "MOD to add points of communications, add two new site
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305981A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305981A1.txt
  • 64.00 dBW Digital Video and Audio 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 36M0G7W Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) E110030 SES-LIC-20110308-00249 E Date Effective: 04/13/2011 Class of Station: Temporary Fixed Earth Station Grant of Authority 04/13/2011 - 04/13/2026 Application for Authority Brigham Young University EZ Nature of Service: Fixed Satellite Service SITE ID: 1 BYUSNG1, VARIOUS LOCATION: ADVENT COMMUNICATIONS B1.5M. 1.59 meters ANTENNA ID: FlLY DRIVE 150 60.38 dBW 8PSK, DIGITAL VIDEO WITH ASSOC. DIGITAL AUDIO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 4M00G7F 8PSK, DIGITAL VIDEO WITH ASSOC. DIGITAL AUDIO 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 4M00G7F Points of Communication: 1 - PERMITTED LIST - () E110031 SES-LIC-20110310-00284 E Date Effective: 04/18/2011 Class of Station: Temporary Fixed Earth Station Grant of Authority 04/18/2011 - 04/18/2026
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.txt
  • 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/03 06/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44 07/01/04 06/30/05 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.25 1.53 07/01/05 06/30/06 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.25 1.59 07/01/06 06/30/07 0.01 0.00 0.54 0.25 1.63 07/01/07 06/30/08 0.01 0.00 0.56 0.26 1.71 07/01/08 06/30/09 0.01 0.00 0.63 0.24 1.80 07/01/09 06/30/10 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.26 1.85 07/01/10 06/30/11 0.00 0.00 0.67 0.27 1.92 07/01/11 06/30/12 0.00 0.00 0.68 0.28 1.98 Access Minute 2 Minute 1 4 Although the charges took effect on 7/1/2000, some companies made adjustments to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.txt
  • % Missed Appointment - Verizon - No Dispatch 0.46 2.49 0.88 11.54 0.73 3.85 0.53 1.41 2c PR-4-14 % Completed On Time [With Serial Number] 85.70 86.98 90.59 94.72 PR-6-01 % Install. Troubles Reported within 30 Days 4.28 8.59 4.28 8.45 4.27 5.31 5.02 3.99 PR-8-01 Open Orders in a Hold Status > 30 Days 0.33 3.75 0.15 4.07 0.15 1.59 0.00 1.17 PR-8-02 Open Orders in a Hold Status > 90 Days 0.33 0.84 0.00 1.22 0.00 0.48 0.00 0.29 UNE 2 Wire xDSL Line Sharing PR-2-01 Av. Interval Completed - Total No Dispatch 4.23 4.90 3.86 3.98 3.85 4.98 PR-2-02 Av. Interval Completed - Total Dispatch 4.75 4.73 NA 19.00 24.00 0.00 1b,2a,3a,4a PR-4-02 Average Delay Days - Total
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.txt
  • 1.58 1.08 1.68 7 Resale ISDN BRI field work 9.56 14.33 9.88 7.00 9.45 8.76 9.24a cde 7 Resale ISDN BRI no field work 2.99 15.00 3.19 4.81 2.46 1.88abcde 7 Resale PBX field work 8.68 7.18 6.17 7.99 1.33 6.58abcde 7 Resale PBX no field work 7.58 6.36 4.65 5.99 1.00 5.04abcde 7 Resale Residential POTS field work 0.76 1.59 0.73 1.59 0.83 1.51 0.80 1.67 0.68 1.44 7 Resale Residential POTS no field work 0.16 0.54 0.13 0.65 0.14 0.62 0.10 0.74 0.07 0.69 7 Resale VGPL/DS0 field work 13.04 6.0010.20 3.0012.92 10.67 9.87abcde 7 UNE Dark Fiber 30.00 tbd tbd tbd 29.00 tbd tbdabcde 7 UNE Dedicated Transport - DS1- Field Work/No field work 9.0012.07 8.0010.95 11.49 9.2911.95
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.txt
  • B.2.1.8.1.12W Analog Loop Design/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 4.03 4.83 4.82 4.52 5.33 4.63 4.50 4.58 5.00 4.21 B.2.1.8.2.12W Analog Loop Design/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 10.00 8.00 11.41 6.50 10.61 7.00 11.32 6.00 11.16 5.67 1,2,3,4,5 B.2.1.9.1.12W Analog Loop Non-Design/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 4.01 3.64 4.81 3.73 5.31 4.29 4.54 3.75 5.01 3.76 B.2.1.9.1.42W Analog Loop Non-Design/<10 circuits/Dispatch In/FL (days) 1.61 3.33 1.53 3.11 1.59 3.64 1.52 3.50 1.89 4.22 4,5 B.2.1.9.2.12W Analog Loop Non-Design/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 9.03 4.55 9.89 6.14 10.18 8.08 11.42 7.92 11.33 5.90 B.2.1.11.1.42W Analog Loop w/INP Non- Design/<10 circuits/Dispatch In/FL (days) 1.61 1.53 1.59 4.00 1.52 1.89 3 B - 25 Metric Metric Name [SQM Number] May June July August September Number and Disaggregation BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-136A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-136A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-136A1.txt
  • $14.35 Standard error † 1.22 1.12 0.46 0.79 1.60 CPST $18.00 $17.23 $22.08 $17.89 $10.34 Standard error 1.77 1.91 0.65 1.10 2.33 Programming total $34.37 $34.28 $34.41 $34.48 $24.69 Standard error 1.29 1.32 0.54 0.60 1.35 Equipment $3.24 $2.77 $4.07 $2.08 $0.79 Standard error 0.33 0.35 0.18 0.24 0.42 Programming & equipment $37.61 $37.05 $38.48 $36.56 $25.48 Standard error 1.45 1.59 0.62 0.70 1.52 Channels 60.9 53.9 67.6 53.4 50.4 Standard error 2.7 3.2 1.0 1.8 3.6 Rate per channel $0.646 $0.776 $0.577 $0.762 $0.528 Standard error 0.034 0.043 0.011 0.033 0.036 Satellite channels 46.4 42.2 51.1 41.5 39.5 Standard error 2.3 2.6 0.9 1.5 3.2 Rate per satellite channel $0.864 $1.105 $0.771 $1.010 $0.679 Standard error 0.052 0.114 0.017 0.052
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A4.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A4.txt
  • navigable waterway or harbor, then the potential interference to these types of Inmarsat terminals would be significantly reduced if not eliminated. Potential Interference to Airborne AMS(R)S/Inmarsat Terminals The frequency band 1545-1555 MHz is allocated to the aeronautical mobile satellite en-route service (AMS(R)S) in the space-to-Earth direction. AMS(R)S is reserved for communications relating to safety of flights (see Provisions No. 1.36, 1.59, 5.37A, and Article 44 of the international Radio Regulations). Inmarsat receivers are often used in the AMS(R)S service. In order to analyze the impact of ATC base stations on AMS(R)S receivers, two cases will be considered: 1) out-of-band interference and 2) receiver desensitization. As discussed earlier, the threshold of -50 dBm is used for the receiver-desensitization analysis. An interference threshold
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A4_Erratum.doc
  • navigable waterway or harbor, then the potential interference to these types of Inmarsat terminals would be significantly reduced if not eliminated. Potential Interference to Airborne AMS(R)S/Inmarsat Terminals The frequency band 1545-1555 MHz is allocated to the aeronautical mobile satellite en-route service (AMS(R)S) in the space-to-Earth direction. AMS(R)S is reserved for communications relating to safety of flights (see Provisions No. 1.36, 1.59, 5.37A, and Article 44 of the international Radio Regulations). Inmarsat receivers are often used in the AMS(R)S service. In order to analyze the impact of ATC base stations on AMS(R)S receivers, two cases will be considered: 1) out-of-band interference and 2) receiver desensitization. As discussed earlier, the threshold of -50 dBm is used for the receiver-desensitization analysis. An interference threshold
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-169A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-169A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-169A1.txt
  • DEVIATION ELEVATION and LN STANDARD DEVIATION ELEVATION*LATITUDE. Thus, it addresses all of the omitted variable claims. Table 2 DBS Penetration and RSN Access Independent Variables Dependent Variable: LN DBS PENETRATION Coefficient z-statistic LN CABLE PRICE 1.06 1.22 LN CABLE CHANNELS -0.72* -1.96 PHILLY -0.51* -6.59 SANDIEGO -0.87* -9.37 CHARLOTTE -0.22 -1.64 KEYDMA 0.23* 4.13 TEAM COUNT -0.04* -3.03 DBSOVERAIR -0.09 -1.59 CABLECOMP 0.04 0.18 HDTV -0.11 -1.57 INTERNET -0.02 -0.21 LN INCOME -0.21 -1.89 LN MULTIDWELL -0.39* -11.53 LN LATITUDE 0.38 0.91 LN STANDARD DEVIATION ELEVATION 1.01* 2.59 LN STANDARD DEVIATION ELEVATION*LATITUDE -0.25* -2.31 CONSTANT -1.08 -0.34 Observations 674 Centered R-Squared 0.42 F-Statistic (16, 657) 81.41 Hansen J Statistic 30.65 * - significant at 95% confidence level This model also does
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-206A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-206A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-206A1.txt
  • slightly. For DIRECTV, ARPU was $70.73 for the six months ended June 2006, compared with $66.91 at mid-year 2005. For EchoStar, ARPU rose to $62.71 in mid-year 2006 from $58.46 in mid-year 2005. EchoStar's turnover rate rose slightly from 1.69 percent in mid-year 2005 to 1.70 percent in mid-year 2006, while DIRECTV's fell from 1.69 percent in mid-year 2005 to 1.59 percent in mid-year 2006. Programming Services and Pricing. DIRECTV and EchoStar offer numerous programming packages. DIRECTV offers five English language and six Spanish language packages. EchoStar offers seven English language and four Spanish language program packages. EchoStar and DIRECTV also offer packages to subscribers in Hawaii and Alaska; DIRECTV and EchoStar offer local stations as well, but Sky Angel service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-56A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-56A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-56A1.txt
  • 79 et seq.; 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(j), 160, 201, 225, and 303. 2. Section 1.49 is amended by adding paragraph (f)(1)(iv) to read as follows: § 1.49 Specifications as to pleadings and documents. (f)(1) (iv) Petition for forbearance proceedings. Subpart A [Amended] 3. Add undesignated center heading below §1.52 to read as follows: Forbearance Proceedings 4. Add new §§1.54 through 1.59 as follows: § 1.54 Petitions for forbearance must be complete as filed. (a) Description of relief sought. Petitions for forbearance must identify the requested relief, including: (1) Each statutory provision, rule, or requirement from which forbearance is sought. (2) Each carrier, or group of carriers, for which forbearance is sought. (3) Each service for which forbearance is sought. (4) Each
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-137A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-137A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-137A1.txt
  • Bur. 2010). The Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (Pennsylvania Commission) and TracFone Wireless, Inc. (TracFone) filed comments on this petition. Cricket filed reply comments. Letter from Matthew A. Brill, Counsel for Cricket Communications, Inc., to Marlene Dortch, FCC, WC Docket No. 09-197, at 1 (filed April 29, 2011) (Cricket Ex Parte Letter April 29, 2011) ; see also 47 C.F.R. § 1.59(b). NTCH Forbearance Petition at 1. See id. at i. On June 29, 2011, the Bureau issued a public notice seeking comment on the Forbearance Petition. Comment Sought on NTCH, Inc. Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in Alabama and Tennessee and Petition for Forbearance from Eligible Telecommunications Carrier Service Area Requirement, WC Docket No. 09-197, Public Notice, 25
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.txt
  • 0.204** 0.011 4 0.125** 0.181** 0.197*** 0.321 (4.75) (3.07) (2.03) (2.23) (1.05) (2.73) (3.18) (0.12) (3.08) (3.00) ( 4.47) (1.96) Land_Area_uc 0.0226 0.0142 -0.0659 0.0955 -0.214 -0.0018 0.0815 0.153 -0 .0904 -0.114 -0.128 -0.269 (0.33) (0.12) (-0.23) (0.29) (-1.45) (-0.01) (0.53) (0.65) (-1.06) (-0. 87) (-0.91) (-0.77) Land_Area_ua -0.107 0.108 0.524 -0.0237 0.140 -0.242 0.0972 0.190 -0.110 0.263 -0.413** -0.476 (-1.59) (0.51) (1.12) (-0.04) (0.56) (-1.95) (0.38) (0.50) (-0.84) (0.9 7) (-3.12) (-0.79) Percent_Water 0.905** -0.0899 -0.825 -1.349 0.167 -0.260 0.654 1.685* 0.375 -0.762 -0 .166 0.131 (3.00) (-0.21) (-0.73) (-0.94) (0.20) (-0.59) (0.84) (2.08) (0.76) (-1. 19) (-0.21) (0.07) Census_Blocs_nu 0.178** 0.192* 0.301 0.232 0.0850 0.126 -0.107 0.192 0.1 40 0.0200 0.0809 -0.352 (2.95) (1.99) (1.71) (0.98) (0.82) (1.17) (-0.75)
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fc99279c.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fc99279c.txt
  • $ 2.94 Missouri $ 16.31 $ 1.36 Nevada $ 2.31 $ 0.19 Ohio $ 26.72 $ 2.23 Oklahoma $ 10.57 $ 0.88 Texas $ 61.48 $ 5.12 Wisconsin $ 14.18 $ 1.18 $ 375.00 $ 31.25 ATTACHMENT A-6 (cont'd) YEAR 3 CAPS ($M) State Annual Monthly Arkansas $ 8.32 $ 0.69 California $ 158.02 $ 13.17 Connecticut $ 19.12 $ 1.59 Illinois $ 60.82 $ 5.07 Indiana $ 19.42 $ 1.62 Kansas $ 11.78 $ 0.98 Michigan $ 47.10 $ 3.93 Missouri $ 21.75 $ 1.81 Nevada $ 3.08 $ 0.26 Ohio $ 35.62 $ 2.97 Oklahoma $ 14.10 $ 1.18 Texas $ 81.97 $ 6.83 Wisconsin $ 18.90 $ 1.57 $ 500.00 $ 41.67 ATTACHMENT B MODEL COLLOCATION ATTESTATION REPORT
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.txt
  • The calculations we make to the competing carriers data, and the resulting differences that we find for non-dispatch resale orders (measured in days), are summarized in the Table below. Estimated Difference in Average Completed Intervals for Non-dispatch Resale Orders June July August BA CLEC Diff BA CLEC Diff BA CLEC Diff Carrier to carrier metrics data 0.96 1.90 -0.94* 1.01 1.59 -0.58* 1.06 1.58 -0.52* Using properly "W" coded CLEC orders 0.96 0.86 0.10 1.01 1.10 -0.09 1.06 1.15 -0.09 Adjustment to CLEC data for difference in standard intervals +0.07 +0.19 +0.10 CLEC data revised for alleged biases 0.96 0.93 0.03 1.01 1.29 -0.28* 1.06 1.25 -0.19* As evidenced by the bottom line of this table, the differences in Average Completed
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Public_Notices/Exparte/1999/exparsbc.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Public_Notices/Exparte/1999/exparsbc.txt
  • 2.94 Missouri $ 16.31 $ 1.36 Nevada $ 2.31 $ 0.19 Ohio $ 26.72 $ 2.23 Oklahoma $ 10.57 $ 0.88 Texas $ 61.48 $ 5.12 Wisconsin $ 14.18 $ 1.18 $ 375.00 $ 31.25 ATTACHMENT A-6 (cont'd) YEAR 3 CIPP CAPS ($M) State Annual Monthly Arkansas $ 8.32 $ 0.69 California $ 158.02 $ 13.17 Connecticut $ 19.12 $ 1.59 Illinois $ 60.82 $ 5.07 Indiana $ 19.42 $ 1.62 Kansas $ 11.78 $ 0.98 Michigan $ 47.10 $ 3.93 Missouri $ 21.75 $ 1.81 Nevada $ 3.08 $ 0.26 Ohio $ 35.62 $ 2.97 Oklahoma $ 14.10 $ 1.18 Texas $ 81.97 $ 6.83 Wisconsin $ 18.90 $ 1.57 $ 500.00 $ 41.67 ATTACHMENT B MODEL COLLOCATION ATTESTATION REPORT
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
  • Report Rate MR-2-02-2341 Network Trouble Report Rate ­ Loop 0.48 0 0.79 0 1.18 1.2 0.23 0 0.36 0 MR-2-03-2341 Network Trouble Report Rate ­ Central Office 0.38 0 0.23 0.65 0.32 1.2 0.27 0 0.36 0 MR-2-04-2341 % Subsequent Reports 21.74 NA 21.43 0 13.16 20 NA NA b,c MR-2-05-2341 % CPE/TOK/FOK Trouble Report Rate 2.42 1.38 2.32 3.25 1.59 0 3.77 5.29 MR-3 ­ Missed Repair Appointments MR-3-01-2341 % Missed Repair Appointment ­ Loop 30 NA 17.65 NA 30.77 0 60 NA 37.5 NA c MR-3-02-2341 % Missed Repair Appointment ­ Central Office 0 NA 40 0 14.29 0 0 NA 25 NA b,c MR-3-03-2341 % CPE/TOK/FOK - Missed Appointment 13.73 0 14 0 8.57 NA 0 0 a,b,d
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-269872A1.html
  • by failing to exhibit all red obstruction lighting on antenna structure # 1059331 from sunset to sunrise. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), that Roy is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of ten thousand dollars ($10,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. Antenna structure #1059331 is located on County Highway 553, 1.59 miles south of Bark River, Michigan. The structure is 145.9 meters (479 feet) in height above ground. Station WMGX, which is licensed to Escanaba License Corp. ("Escanaba"), transmits from the top of the structure. According to the antenna structure registration, the structure is required to have "Obstruction Marking and Lighting" in accordance with paragraphs 3, 4, 5, and 13 of
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/napoli-stmt.pdf
  • Cable Penetration .03 .04 .07 Commercial TV Stations .52** .16 .51 Station Characteristics Station Revenues (000) .00001.00 .14 VHF/UHF (0 = U; 1 = V) .82 .79 .11 Big Four Affiliate (0 = No; 1 = Yes) 3.1* 1.41 .35 Other Net Affiliate (0 = No; 1 = Yes) -.19 1.20 -.02 Local Owner (0 = No; 1 = Yes) 1.59* .79 .20 National Audience Reach (000) .00001.00 .04 Constant -3.67 4.51 Adjusted R2 = .24 (p < .01). * p < .05. ** p < .01. 17 Localism Policy Priorities When we assess these results within the context of the traditional rationales for localism, a number of important points arise. First, there may be little reason to expect localism ­
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/21/charts/21press2.pdf
  • 3 $5,185,771.00 $3,370,757.00 4 0.75 3 0.94 42 1 1 $5,029,088.00 $3,268,910.00 4 0.75 3 0.28 43 7 5 $5,063,664.00 $3,291,385.00 4 0.75 3 2.04 44 4 3 $5,070,364.00 $3,295,740.00 4 0.75 3 0.97 45 4 3 $5,081,264.00 $3,302,825.00 4 0.75 3 0.95 46 2 2 $5,090,264.00 $3,308,675.00 4 0.75 3 0.86 47 2 2 $5,222,264.00 $3,394,475.00 4 0.75 3 1.59 48 2 2 $5,234,580.00 $3,402,480.00 4 0.75 3 0.68 49 2 2 $5,250,180.00 $3,412,620.00 4 0.75 3 0.68 50 2 2 $5,252,353.00 $3,414,033.00 4 0.75 3 0.81 51 2 2 $5,256,553.00 $3,416,763.00 4 0.75 3 0.81 52 1 1 $5,260,553.00 $3,419,363.00 4 0.75 3 0.59 53 6 6 $5,289,677.00 $3,438,294.00 4 0.75 3 0.84 54 0 0 $5,289,677.00 $3,438,294.00 4
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/rss/index.htm?job=ainf&id=93
  • Bidders: 77 (of 109 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=93M on, 02 Apr 2012 15:05:01 GMT Summary Permits: 119 FM Broadcast construction permits Qualified Bidders: 109 Rounds Completed: 18 Bidding Days: 5 Results for Round 18 Gross Revenue: $3,843,650.00 - Dollar Change: $136,350.00 - % Change: 3.68 Net Revenue: $3,253,437.50 - Dollar Change: $50,875.00 - % Change: 1.59 New Bids: 37 Withdrawn Bids: 0 Proactive Waivers: 0 Bidders that Reduced Eligibility: 7 Permits with PWBs*: 93 FCC Held Permits: 26 Eligible Bidders: 75 (of 109 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=93M on, 02 Apr 2012 17:05:01 GMT Summary Permits: 119 FM Broadcast construction permits Qualified Bidders: 109 Rounds Completed: 19 Bidding Days: 5 Results for
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fc99279c.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fc99279c.txt
  • $ 2.94 Missouri $ 16.31 $ 1.36 Nevada $ 2.31 $ 0.19 Ohio $ 26.72 $ 2.23 Oklahoma $ 10.57 $ 0.88 Texas $ 61.48 $ 5.12 Wisconsin $ 14.18 $ 1.18 $ 375.00 $ 31.25 ATTACHMENT A-6 (cont'd) YEAR 3 CAPS ($M) State Annual Monthly Arkansas $ 8.32 $ 0.69 California $ 158.02 $ 13.17 Connecticut $ 19.12 $ 1.59 Illinois $ 60.82 $ 5.07 Indiana $ 19.42 $ 1.62 Kansas $ 11.78 $ 0.98 Michigan $ 47.10 $ 3.93 Missouri $ 21.75 $ 1.81 Nevada $ 3.08 $ 0.26 Ohio $ 35.62 $ 2.97 Oklahoma $ 14.10 $ 1.18 Texas $ 81.97 $ 6.83 Wisconsin $ 18.90 $ 1.57 $ 500.00 $ 41.67 ATTACHMENT B MODEL COLLOCATION ATTESTATION REPORT
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.txt
  • The calculations we make to the competing carriers data, and the resulting differences that we find for non-dispatch resale orders (measured in days), are summarized in the Table below. Estimated Difference in Average Completed Intervals for Non-dispatch Resale Orders June July August BA CLEC Diff BA CLEC Diff BA CLEC Diff Carrier to carrier metrics data 0.96 1.90 -0.94* 1.01 1.59 -0.58* 1.06 1.58 -0.52* Using properly "W" coded CLEC orders 0.96 0.86 0.10 1.01 1.10 -0.09 1.06 1.15 -0.09 Adjustment to CLEC data for difference in standard intervals +0.07 +0.19 +0.10 CLEC data revised for alleged biases 0.96 0.93 0.03 1.01 1.29 -0.28* 1.06 1.25 -0.19* As evidenced by the bottom line of this table, the differences in Average Completed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001105.doc
  • this petition to the FCC. In the Palenville exchange, fifty-one percent of those responding voted for the EAS. It was not necessary to survey the Kingston exchange since their rates will not increase. The Palenville exchange (Bell Atlantic) has 1,454 access lines; the Kingston exchange (Bell Atlantic), has 29,119 access lines. Customer calls per month from Palenville to Kingston is 1.59, and from Kingston to Palenville is .06. Customer calls per month was taken from a 1982 point-to-point study. Data on percent of subscribers making calls is not available. See U.S.C. § 271(b)(1). The BOC may provide ELCS service without meeting the section 271 requirements, see 47 U.S.C. § 271(a), and a separate affiliate is not required, see 47 U.S.C. §
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2002/fcc02331.pdf
  • B.2.1.8.1.12W Analog Loop Design/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 4.03 4.83 4.82 4.52 5.33 4.63 4.50 4.58 5.00 4.21 B.2.1.8.2.12W Analog Loop Design/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 10.00 8.00 11.41 6.50 10.61 7.00 11.32 6.00 11.16 5.67 1,2,3,4,5 B.2.1.9.1.12W Analog Loop Non-Design/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 4.01 3.64 4.81 3.73 5.31 4.29 4.54 3.75 5.01 3.76 B.2.1.9.1.42W Analog Loop Non-Design/<10 circuits/Dispatch In/FL (days) 1.61 3.33 1.53 3.11 1.59 3.64 1.52 3.50 1.89 4.22 4,5 B.2.1.9.2.12W Analog Loop Non-Design/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (days) 9.03 4.55 9.89 6.14 10.18 8.08 11.42 7.92 11.33 5.90 B.2.1.11.1.42W Analog Loop w/INP Non- Design/<10 circuits/Dispatch In/FL (days) 1.61 1.53 1.59 4.00 1.52 1.89 3 B - 25 Metric Metric Name [SQM Number] May June July August September Number and Disaggregation BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • 1.05 1.80 2.38 1.41 1.07 2.64 1.57 1.16 2.83 1.68 1.25 2.85 1.69 1.35 2.98 1.77 1.48 3.11 1.85 1.53 1982 1.05 $0.65 $0.61 1.42 $0.89 $0.84 1.80 $1.12 $1.05 2.33 1.46 1.39 2.45 1.45 1.44 2.62 1.65 1.54 2.69 1.69 1.60 2.76 1.73 1.63 3.09 1.93 1.82 1983 1.05 0.92 0.89 1.42 1.26 1.19 1.80 1.39 1.30 2.33 1.61 1.59 2.45 1.70 1.68 2.62 1.81 1.72 2.69 1.86 1.80 2.76 1.91 1.82 3.09 2.13 1.99 1984 0.99 0.90 0.97 1.36 1.21 1.31 1.67 1.55 1.65 2.21 2.05 2.09 2.32 2.19 2.23 2.43 2.25 2.33 2.50 2.40 2.43 2.57 2.47 2.49 2.89 2.73 2.69 1985 1.18 1.10 1.12 1.55 1.44 1.32 1.80 1.71 1.45 2.08 1.98 2.05 2.19 2.09 2.13 2.31
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • $1.32 19810.73 1.05 1.80 2.38 1.41 1.07 2.64 1.57 1.16 2.83 1.68 1.25 2.85 1.69 1.35 2.98 1.77 1.48 3.11 1.85 1.53 19821.05 $0.65 $0.61 1.42 $0.89 $0.84 1.80 $1.12 $1.05 2.33 1.46 1.39 2.45 1.45 1.44 2.62 1.65 1.54 2.69 1.69 1.60 2.76 1.73 1.63 3.09 1.93 1.82 19831.05 0.92 0.89 1.42 1.26 1.19 1.80 1.39 1.30 2.33 1.61 1.59 2.45 1.70 1.68 2.62 1.81 1.72 2.69 1.86 1.80 2.76 1.91 1.82 3.09 2.13 1.99 19840.99 0.90 0.97 1.36 1.21 1.31 1.67 1.55 1.65 2.21 2.05 2.09 2.32 2.19 2.23 2.43 2.25 2.33 2.50 2.40 2.43 2.57 2.47 2.49 2.89 2.73 2.69 19851.18 1.10 1.12 1.55 1.44 1.32 1.80 1.71 1.45 2.08 1.98 2.05 2.19 2.09 2.13 2.31 2.14 2.25
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-97.pdf
  • 650 0.03 LOUISIANA 8,025 0.27 5,557 0.19 2,468 0.08 MAINE 6,145 0.63 1,842 0.19 4,303 0.44 MARYLAND 498 0.01 9,032 0.22 (8,534) (0.20) MASSACHUSETTS 270 0.01 11,389 0.21 (11,118) (0.21) MICHIGAN 10,043 0.13 11,428 0.15 (1,385) (0.02) MINNESOTA 18,068 0.52 7,079 0.20 10,989 0.32 MISSISSIPPI 4,227 0.27 3,359 0.21 868 0.05 MISSOURI 9,464 0.24 7,703 0.19 1,761 0.04 MONTANA 9,694 1.59 1,527 0.25 8,167 1.34 NEBRASKA 10,409 0.87 2,543 0.21 7,865 0.66 NEVADA 4,789 0.33 3,955 0.27 834 0.06 NEW HAMPSHIRE 4,873 0.50 2,775 0.28 2,098 0.21 NEW JERSEY 1,098 0.01 18,056 0.24 (16,958) (0.23) NEW MEXICO 9,279 0.86 2,839 0.26 6,440 0.60 NEW YORK 18,238 0.12 29,926 0.20 (11,688) (0.08) NORTH CAROLINA 6,241 0.11 11,569 0.21 (5,328) (0.09) NORTH DAKOTA
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-99.pdf
  • New Jersey 20.52 4.76 19.12 33.48 1.02 0.75 79.64 15.49 95.13 New Mexico 30.10 5.49 10.22 38.43 0.94 1.01 86.20 17.41 103.61 New York 36.37 4.82 11.32 28.41 3.96 0.87 85.75 17.22 102.97 North Carolina 31.29 4.76 13.18 30.04 1.39 0.77 81.43 22.74 104.17 North Dakota 24.73 5.10 15.26 35.62 0.86 1.07 82.65 20.45 103.10 Ohio 28.33 4.50 14.35 24.70 1.59 0.71 74.18 21.11 95.29 Oklahoma 28.14 4.53 9.44 27.73 0.88 0.70 71.42 18.10 89.52 Oregon 27.25 5.37 10.32 32.14 0.95 0.95 76.97 19.63 96.59 Pennsylvania 22.18 4.39 14.81 25.41 2.08 0.61 69.47 14.93 84.39 Rhode Island 24.60 4.68 9.44 35.80 1.02 0.80 76.34 18.81 95.15 South Carolina 36.57 4.87 11.40 32.96 0.91 0.81 87.52 22.30 109.82 South Dakota 26.22 5.05
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend199.pdf
  • after the initial publication of the data. 19 - 6 TABLE 19.5 TELEPHONE REVENUE BY STATE (REVENUE IN MILLION OF DOLLARS) 1995 1996 1997 PERCENTPERCENT CARRIER'S END OF CHANGE STATE NAME TOTAL TOTAL CARRIER USER TOTAL TOTAL 1995-1997 ALABAMA $2,668 $2,946 $558 $2,647 $3,205 1.39% 20.1% ALASKA 464 518 109 452 561 0.24 21.0 ARIZONA 2,842 3,249 719 2,948 3,667 1.59 29.0 ARKANSAS 1,534 1,719 347 1,538 1,885 0.82 22.9 CALIFORNIA 22,379 25,100 4,887 22,349 27,236 11.78 21.7 COLORADO 3,128 3,526 785 3,222 4,006 1.73 28.1 CONNECTICUT 2,765 2,943 561 2,705 3,266 1.41 18.1 DELAWARE 492 567 101 527 627 0.27 27.5 DIST. OF COLUMBIA 886 955 218 831 1,049 0.45 18.3 FLORIDA 11,582 12,972 2,831 11,330 14,161 6.13 22.3 GEORGIA
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • Iowa Telecom 1.66 0.00 0.84 0.22 3.96 252 516 770 Qwest 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.19 1.41 21,588 40,107 62,239 SBC 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.21 1.46 63,313 86,767 152,856 Sprint 0.30 0.00 0.70 0.18 2.12 9,467 14,759 24,349 Verizon 0.35 0.00 0.48 0.21 1.79 61,426 127,515 190,453 All Price Caps 0.16 0.00 0.49 0.22 1.63 188,412 328,724 521,451 NECA 1.00 1.39 1.59 1.43 8.62 14,074 16,181 15,903 All Price Caps and NECA 0.23¢ 0.07¢ 0.52¢ 0.26¢ 1.91¢ 202,487 344,905 537,355 Source: Access tariff filings. Switched Traffic Sensitive Per Carrier Common Line per Terminating Switched Non-Traffic Sensitive Per Total Charge per Conversation Minute 3/ 2/ Non-traffic sensitive charges include charges assessed on a per-month, per-unit basis. Prior to 07/01/94 these charges were included
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend299.pdf
  • the initial publication of the data. 19 - 6 TABLE 19.5 TELEPHONE REVENUE BY STATE (REVENUE IN MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) 1995 1996 1997 Percent Percent Carrier's End Of Change State Name Total Total Carrier User Total Total 1995-1997 Alabama $2,668 $2,946 $558 $2,647 $3,205 1.39% 20.1% Alaska 464 518 109 452 561 0.24 21.0 Arizona 2,842 3,249 719 2,948 3,667 1.59 29.0 Arkansas 1,534 1,719 347 1,538 1,885 0.82 22.9 California 22,379 25,100 4,887 22,349 27,236 11.78 21.7 Colorado 3,128 3,526 785 3,222 4,006 1.73 28.1 Connecticut 2,765 2,943 561 2,705 3,266 1.41 18.1 Delaware 492 567 101 527 627 0.27 27.5 Dist. of Columbia 886 955 218 831 1,049 0.45 18.3 Florida 11,582 12,972 2,831 11,330 14,161 6.13 22.3 Georgia
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
  • 3.16 1940 0.21 0.26 14.0 2.59 3.14 1941 0.21 0.26 14.7 2.43 2.99 1942 0.22 0.26 16.3 2.28 2.69 1943 0.21 0.22 17.3 2.10 2.19 1944 0.22 0.22 17.6 2.11 2.15 1945 0.21 0.22 18.0 2.03 2.10 1946 0.20 0.22 19.5 1.74 1.94 1947 0.19 0.22 22.3 1.48 1.70 1948 0.19 0.22 24.1 1.33 1.57 1949 0.19 0.22 23.8 1.36 1.59 1950 0.19 0.22 24.1 1.38 1.57 1951 0.20 0.22 26.0 1.33 1.46 1952 0.20 0.22 26.5 1.32 1.43 1953 0.21 0.22 26.7 1.34 1.42 1954 0.22 0.22 26.9 1.43 1.41 1955 0.23 0.22 26.8 1.48 1.41 1956 0.23 0.22 27.2 1.48 1.39 1957 0.24 0.22 28.1 1.46 1.35 1958 0.24 0.22 28.9 1.42 1.31 1959 0.24 0.22 29.1 1.43 1.30
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
  • 2,160 Iowa Telecom 0.81 0.00 0.84 0.15 2.90 134 185 331 Qwest 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.18 1.47 21,018 39,686 61,107 SBC 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.21 1.30 64,610 92,623 158,985 Sprint 0.03 0.00 0.63 0.17 1.68 10,375 15,681 26,235 Verizon 0.20 0.00 0.44 0.21 1.54 58,300 131,143 190,087 Price Caps 0.07 0.00 0.45 0.21 1.42 186,646 342,940 530,987 NECA 1.00 1.40 1.59 1.43 8.62 16,085 17,824 17,354 All Price Caps and NECA 0.15¢ 0.07¢ 0.48¢ 0.24¢ 1.71¢ 202,731 360,764 548,341 Source: Access tariff filings. 2/ Non-traffic sensitive charges include charges assessed on a per-month, per-unit basis. Prior to 07/01/94 these charges were included in the average traffic- sensitive rates. 3/ The total charge per conversation minute consists of charges on the originating
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • 0.19 McLeodUSA Telecommunications Services, Inc. 71,043,812 266,596,652 38,431,235 0.69 Mpower Communications Corporation 1,813,190 5,439,569 4,177,314 0.08 Network Communications International Corporation 383,749 2,722,626 14,534,255 0.26 NOS Communications, Inc. 2,135,119 15,267,492 4,304,577 0.08 PaeTec Communications, Inc. 7,306,880 25,670,877 5,567,621 0.10 Primus Telecommunications, Inc. 59,136,613 202,518,601 13,824,516 0.25 Qwest Communications International, Inc. 93,775,111 609,540,002 152,203,832 2.73 RSL COM U.S.A., Inc. 136,975,857 722,034,414 88,524,359 1.59 SBC Communications, Inc. 16,915,381 129,768,660 57,472,407 1.03 Sprint Corporation 110,098,596 567,570,336 146,381,204 2.63 Sprint PCS 9,453,853 50,419,403 28,787,634 0.52 Startec Global Communications Corp. 56,161,433 378,562,427 72,000,682 1.29 Talk America Inc. 64,152,315 453,142,969 26,863,417 0.48 TeleDirect Telecommunications Group, LLC 19,933,965 108,294,945 26,107,000 0.47 Telenational Communication, Inc. d/b/a Worldport 4,218,807 42,188,072 5,273,509 0.09 Telstar International, Inc. 31,963,374 318,669,847 64,950,978 1.17 UniPlex Telecom
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd98.pdf
  • To Retained of from Billed To Retained from U.S. retained & Minutes Revenue PTT Revenue Minutes PTT Revenue PTT Revenue PTT foreign receipts 1964 2/ 20 $63 $30 $33 12 $20 $3.11 $1.50 $1.62 $1.63 $1.62 1965 2/ 26 78 37 41 15 25 3.07 1.46 1.61 1.60 1.61 1966 2/ 32 100 48 53 19 30 3.10 1.47 1.63 1.59 1.61 1967 2/ 40 114 55 60 23 32 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46 127 62 65 28 40 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 65 172 83 89 38 52 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81 197 99 98 51 60 2.43 1.22 1.21 1.17 1.19 1971 101 237 121 117 68 75 2.35 1.20 1.16
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd99.pdf
  • To Retained of from Billed To Retained from U.S. retained & Minutes Revenue PTT Revenue Minutes PTT Revenue PTT Revenue PTT foreign receipts 1964 2/ 20 $63 $30 $33 12 $20 $3.11 $1.50 $1.62 $1.63 $1.62 1965 2/ 26 78 37 41 15 25 3.07 1.46 1.61 1.60 1.61 1966 2/ 32 100 48 53 19 30 3.10 1.47 1.63 1.59 1.61 1967 2/ 40 114 55 60 23 32 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46 127 62 65 28 40 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 65 172 83 89 38 52 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81 197 99 98 51 60 2.43 1.22 1.21 1.17 1.19 1971 101 237 121 117 68 75 2.35 1.20 1.16
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd00.pdf
  • of from Billed to Retained from Revenues for Minutes Revenues PTT Revenues Minutes PTT Revenues PTT Revenues PTT all U.S. and 4/ 5/ 4/ Foreign Minutes 1964 20.2 $62.9 $30.3 $32.6 12.0 $19.6 $3.11 $1.50 $1.62 $1.63 $1.62 1965 25.5 78.2 37.2 41.1 15.4 24.7 3.07 1.46 1.61 1.60 1.61 1966 32.3 100.1 47.6 52.5 18.9 30.1 3.10 1.47 1.63 1.59 1.61 1967 39.7 114.2 54.6 59.6 23.4 31.8 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46.4 126.9 61.5 65.4 28.2 40.0 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 64.6 172.0 82.7 89.4 38.3 51.6 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81.1 196.6 98.9 97.7 51.0 59.8 2.43 1.22 1.21 1.17 1.19 1971 100.9 237.4 120.7 116.6 68.4 75.1 2.35 1.20 1.16 1.10
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd01.pdf
  • of from Billed to Revenues from Revenues Minutes Revenues Foreign Minutes Foreign RevenuesForeign Foreign for all U.S. 4/ Carriers Carriers 6/ Carriers Carriers and Foreign Minutes 1964 20.2 $62.9 $30.3 $32.6 12.0 $19.6 $3.11 $1.50 $1.62 $1.63 $1.62 1965 25.5 78.2 37.2 41.1 15.4 24.7 3.07 1.46 1.61 1.60 1.61 1966 32.3 100.1 47.6 52.5 18.9 30.1 3.10 1.47 1.63 1.59 1.61 1967 39.7 114.2 54.6 59.6 23.4 31.8 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46.4 126.9 61.5 65.4 28.2 40.0 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 64.6 172.0 82.7 89.4 38.3 51.6 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81.1 196.6 98.9 97.7 51.0 59.8 2.43 1.22 1.21 1.17 1.19 1971 100.9 237.4 120.7 116.6 68.4 75.1 2.35 1.20 1.16 1.10
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • 0.00 0.27 0.19 0.09 0.21 1.20 Texas 0.69 0.00 0.19 0.24 0.05 0.12 1.28 Utah 0.47 0.00 0.11 0.17 0.19 0.39 1.34 Vermont 1.15 1.78 0.48 0.38 0.36 0.88 5.04 Virgin Islands 24.55 0.00 9.88 0.00 7.72 0.00 42.15 Virginia 0.07 0.00 0.06 0.99 0.03 0.10 1.24 Washington 0.75 0.00 0.34 0.53 0.05 0.17 1.85 West Virginia 2.03 2.47 0.09 1.59 0.05 0.29 6.51 Wisconsin 0.51 0.00 0.31 0.03 0.25 0.54 1.64 Wyoming 3.65 2.63 1.24 1.64 0.36 1.67 11.19 Total $0.48 $0.10 $0.22 $0.27 $0.08 $0.18 $1.34 1 Includes only hold harmless payments to non-rural carriers. High Cost Support1 Interstate Interstate Support Notes: Figures may not add due to rounding. Support payments do not include quarterly true-ups. Common Line Access
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-11.pdf
  • 0.82 Verizon - South - Virginia VA (1,270) (1,270) 0 0.00 Sprint - UTC - Southeast - Virginia VA (139) (104) (34) 24.46 CenturyTel - Washington WA (152) (162) 10 (6.58) Verizon - NW - Contel - Washington WA (1,660) (1,589) (72) 4.34 Verizon - NW - Washington WA (5,932) (5,864) (68) 1.15 Qwest - Washington WA (32,830) (32,354) (521) 1.59 Sprint - United Tel. Co. of the NW - Washington WA (59) (45) (14) 23.73 Verizon - West Virginia WV 6,739 6,888 (148) (2.20) Verizon - North - Wisconsin WI (2,724) (2,713) (11) 0.40 SBC - Ameritech - Wisconsin Bell WI 71,374 71,436 (62) (0.09) Qwest - Wyoming WY 2,313 2,353 (43) (1.86) 11 - 42 Table 11.10 Total Non-Operating
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-2.pdf
  • 13.17 South Carolina 7.50 8.25 8.23 0.00 3.50 3.48 0.00 1.75 1.74 7.50 10.00 9.97 7.50 13.50 13.46 South Dakota 5.25 8.25 7.63 0.00 3.50 0.00 0.00 1.75 0.00 5.25 10.00 7.63 5.25 13.50 7.63 Tennessee 7.24 8.25 8.16 0.00 3.50 3.19 0.00 1.75 1.60 7.24 10.00 9.76 7.24 13.50 12.95 Texas 3.50 8.25 7.23 0.00 3.50 3.18 0.00 1.75 1.59 3.50 10.00 8.82 3.50 13.50 12.00 Utah 8.25 8.25 8.25 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 10.00 10.00 10.00 13.50 13.50 13.49 Vermont 8.20 8.25 8.21 2.70 3.50 3.48 1.35 1.75 1.74 9.55 10.00 9.95 12.25 13.50 13.43 Virginia 7.16 8.25 7.72 0.00 3.50 2.97 0.00 1.75 1.48 7.16 10.00 9.21 7.16 13.50 12.17 Washington 5.85 8.25 7.89 0.00 3.50
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.10 0.27 0.13 1.36 Utah 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.42 0.18 0.43 1.69 Vermont 1.09 0.00 1.99 0.50 0.77 0.39 0.96 5.69 Virgin Islands 17.28 0.00 0.00 9.20 9.79 0.00 0.00 36.27 Virginia 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.06 1.07 0.11 1.39 Washington 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.11 0.58 0.18 1.92 West Virginia 1.83 0.00 2.61 0.09 0.10 1.59 0.36 6.58 Wisconsin 0.61 0.02 0.00 0.33 0.64 0.01 0.60 2.21 Wyoming 4.22 0.02 2.94 1.46 0.86 2.07 1.65 13.22 Industry $0.50 $0.00 $0.11 $0.23 $0.18 $0.29 $0.20 $1.52 Based on 2003 support payments and year-end 2002 loops. Loop Model Support Table 3.15 Monthly Support per Loop for High-Cost Support Mechanisms: 2003 Local Long Safety Net Additive High Cost Support
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • Iowa Telecom 1.66 0.00 0.84 0.22 3.96 252 516 770 Qwest 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.19 1.41 21,588 40,107 62,239 SBC 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.21 1.46 63,313 86,767 152,856 Sprint 0.30 0.00 0.70 0.18 2.12 9,467 14,759 24,349 Verizon 0.35 0.00 0.48 0.21 1.79 61,426 127,515 190,453 All Price Caps 0.16 0.00 0.49 0.22 1.63 188,412 328,724 521,451 NECA 1.00 1.39 1.59 1.43 8.62 14,074 16,181 15,903 All Price Caps And NECA 0.23¢ 0.07¢ 0.52¢ 0.26¢ 1.91¢ 202,487 344,905 537,355 Source: Access tariff filings. Switched Traffic Sensitive per Carrier Common Line per Terminating Switched Non-Traffic Sensitive per Total Charge per Conversation Minute*** ** Non-traffic sensitive charges include charges assessed on a per-month per-unit basis. Prior to 07/01/94 these charges were included in
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • TELEPHONE COMPANY 27.60 7.58 18.61 INFINITE 613013 C KETCHIKAN PUBLIC UTILITIES -3.50 3.90 -7.13 -28.34 613015 C MATANUSKA TELEPHONE ASSOC., INC. 3.44 9.30 -5.37 -3.55 613016 C MUKLUK TEL. COMPANY, INC. -5.41 12.16 -15.67 -13.46 613017A>CALASKA TELEPHONE COMPANY 8.70 0.15 8.53 46.75 613018 C NUSHAGAK TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE, INC. 14.25 4.22 9.62 26.53 613019 C OTZ TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE, INC. -2.55 -0.98 -1.59 -5.93 613020 C SITKA TELEPHONE COMPANY 31.51 -2.17 34.43 94.08 613022 C TELEPHONE UTILITIES OF ALASKA 21.24 3.84 16.75 0.00 613023 C UNITED UTILITIES INC. 5.23 9.26 -3.69 -0.31 613025 C YUKON TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. 22.35 12.85 8.41 31.19 613026 A NORTH COUNTRY TELEPHONE COMPANY 3.95 4.89 -0.90 -3.71 613028 C SUMMIT TEL & TEL CO OF ALASKA 8.99 -6.55
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • DBA RTC COMM. 22.92 8.29 13.52 90.25 320771 A GEETINGSVILLE TEL. CO., INC. 19.71 11.22 7.63 140.00 320772 C VERIZON NORTH INC.-IN (GTE) 4.76 0.99 3.73 0.00 320775 C HANCOCK RURAL TEL. CORP. DBA HANCOCK TELECOM 17.20 -0.51 17.80 134.18 320776 C COMM. CORP. OF INDIANA 1.94 4.80 -2.73 1.53 320777 A HOME TEL. CO. OF PITTSBORO, INC. 9.21 7.51 1.59 0.00 320778 A HOME TEL. CO., INC. 5.76 1.03 4.68 0.00 320779 C VERIZON NORTH INC. - IN (CONTEL) (GTE) 8.76 2.23 6.38 0.00 320783 A LIGONIER TEL. CO. 5.82 3.77 1.98 0.00 320788 C MERCHANTS & FARMERS TEL. CO. -3.83 2.45 -6.13 -16.00 3 - 189 Table 3.33 High-Cost Loop Support Percentage Changes from 1999 to 2000 by Study
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/00socc.pdf
  • Leone 3.00 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 0.77 0.75 Singapore 1.10 1.20 0.97 0.85 0.86 0.92 0.92 0.90 0.85 0.52 0.30 0.30 0.30 South Africa 2.00 2.00 1.80 1.80 1.50 1.20 1.20 1.00 1.00 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.38 Spain 10/ 2.10 2.28 2.15 2.06 1.80 1.78 1.44 0.64 0.48 0.26 0.27 0.26 0.25 Switzerland 1.47 1.59 1.16 1.11 0.84 0.91 0.52 0.51 0.34 0.28 0.27 0.26 0.25 Taiwan 1.90 1.80 1.60 1.40 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.14 0.45 0.30 0.30 0.30 Thailand 2.30 2.30 2.00 1.75 1.60 1.60 1.55 1.50 1.20 0.90 0.60 0.48 0.38 Turkey 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.93 1.66 1.78 1.63 1.16 0.82 0.76 0.66 0.51 0.41 United Kingdom 10/ 1.06 1.06 0.97 0.74
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/01socc.pdf
  • 306.7 85.8 45.4 40.4 8.06 5.63 1.88 15.57 24.8 IL Indiana 241.5 185.7 55.8 37.1 18.7 2.60 0.98 0.59 4.16 14.5IN Iowa 82.1 29.3 52.9 38.5 14.4 8.10 2.79 (0.53) 10.35 4.0IA Kansas 212.0 132.2 79.8 68.1 11.7 4.04 1.08 1.21 6.34 5.4KS Kentucky 108.7 67.6 41.1 28.3 12.8 1.89 0.75 1.24 3.88 9.0KY Louisiana 111.1 51.1 60.0 48.3 11.7 1.59 (0.17) 1.00 2.42 9.3LA Maine 37.6 16.9 20.7 10.6 10.1 2.69 0.84 2.06 5.58 4.5ME Maryland 274.8 143.3 131.6 78.9 52.7 12.58 5.29 12.07 29.94 22.7MD Massachusetts 249.2 110.1 139.1 66.2 72.9 11.37 7.91 26.17 45.45 27.4MA Michigan 221.5 187.1 34.4 15.2 19.2 3.01 1.92 0.83 5.76 13.5MI Minnesota 153.4 74.1 79.2 57.2 22.1 11.28 1.71 0.72 13.71 8.4MN Mississippi
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/95socc.pdf
  • STANDARD DISCOUNT ECONOMY 8AM-6PM 6PM-MIDN MIDN-8AM 8AM-6PM 6PM-MIDN MIDN-8AM ARGENTINA INTERNATIONAL DIAL $2.22 $1.47 $1.22 $1.97 $1.30 $1.09 ALL OTHER* 3.60 2.75 2.24 1.97 1.30 1.14 2PM-8PM 8PM-3AM 3AM-2PM 2PM-8PM 8PM-3AM 3AM-2PM AUSTRALIA (INCLUDING TASMANIA) INTERNATIONAL DIAL 1.93 1.26 1.10 1.71 1.12 0.99 ALL OTHER* 3.19 2.57 1.79 1.48 1.29 1.19 7AM-1PM 1PM-6PM 6PM-7AM 7AM-1PM 1PM-6PM 6PM-7AM AUSTRIA INTERNATIONAL DIAL 1.59 1.18 1.07 1.44 1.07 0.98 ALL OTHER* 2.08 1.54 1.32 1.46 1.09 0.99 8AM-5PM 5PM-11PM 11PM-8AM 8AM-5PM 5PM-11PM 11PM-8AM BAHAMAS INTERNATIONAL DIAL 1.28 0.92 0.84 1.14 0.84 0.76 ALL OTHER* 1.30 1.09 0.99 1.19 1.05 0.99 7AM-1PM 1PM-6PM 6PM-7AM 7AM-1PM 1PM-6PM 6PM-7AM BELGIUM INTERNATIONAL DIAL 1.84 1.17 1.03 1.65 1.04 0.94 ALL OTHER* 2.10 1.58 1.26 1.67 1.06 0.95 8AM-5PM
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/96socc.pdf
  • 2.03 (1.00) 1.01 2.04 48.9 FL GEORGIA 200.2 100.8 99.4 91.4 8.0 (2.81) (0.44) (0.53) (3.78) 11.8 GA HAWAII 126.3 74.1 52.2 46.3 5.9 0.93 (0.01) 0.35 1.27 4.6 HI IDAHO 11.9 17.8 (5.8) (5.5) (0.3) (2.23) (1.19) (0.72) (4.15) 3.8 ID ILLINOIS 412.5 289.4 123.1 99.9 23.2 (3.40) 0.64 0.58 (2.18) 25.4 IL INDIANA 224.9 161.9 63.1 47.1 16.0 1.59 0.79 0.82 3.21 12.8 IN IOWA 19.3 28.8 (9.6) (8.2) (1.4) (2.92) (1.99) (1.87) (6.78) 5.4 IA KANSAS 68.5 57.4 11.1 5.7 5.4 0.01 0.09 0.14 0.24 5.2 KS KENTUCKY 98.3 42.1 56.2 49.2 7.0 1.04 0.17 0.25 1.45 5.5 KY LOUISIANA 129.7 39.8 89.9 85.9 4.0 (1.16) 0.00 (0.17) (1.32) 5.3 LA MAINE 31.3 4.1 27.2 22.8 4.3 0.50
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/97socc.pdf
  • (0.86) (0.61) 0.11 (1.36) 27.7 IL INDIANA 267.2 191.5 75.7 58.1 17.6 2.21 0.33 0.71 3.25 14.3 IN IOWA 24.3 31.3 (7.0) (6.0) (1.0) (3.15) (1.80) (1.74) (6.69) 5.6 IA KANSAS 98.8 67.8 31.0 26.2 4.8 (0.40) (0.03) 0.01 (0.42) 5.3 KS KENTUCKY 89.8 48.3 41.4 34.6 6.9 0.48 (0.16) 0.21 0.53 6.3 KY LOUISIANA 102.3 49.7 52.6 46.7 5.9 (1.59) 0.04 (1.55) 7.4 LA MAINE 23.8 6.3 17.5 13.1 4.5 0.79 0.00 0.10 0.90 3.6 ME MARYLAND 211.4 107.4 104.0 72.1 31.9 6.78 2.91 4.52 14.21 17.7 MD MASSACHUSETTS 242.7 83.6 159.1 126.0 33.1 3.94 2.83 2.70 9.48 23.6 MA MICHIGAN 295.7 232.4 63.4 46.8 16.6 (1.13) (0.59) (0.09) (1.81) 18.4 MI MINNESOTA 52.1 50.4 1.6 (2.5) 4.2 (2.47) (0.93)
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/98SOCC.PDF
  • T A L MISCELLANEOUS SUBJECT TO STATE INTERSTATE COLLECTIONS ADJUSTMENTS SEPARATIONS COMMON TRAFFIC SPECIAL T O T A L AND LINE SENSITIVE INTEREXCHANGE ALL REPORTING COS. $33,757.3 $129.8 $33,541.2$8,281.6 $25,259.6$13,277.9 $6,230.2$5,735.3 $25,243.4 $16.2 BELL OPERATING COS. 25,223.2 58.6 25,164.7 5,300.3 19,864.4 10,076.8 4,948.2 4,823.2 19,848.2 16.2 ALL OTHER COS. 8,534.1 71.2 8,376.5 2,981.3 5,395.2 3,201.1 1,282.0 912.1 5,395.2 ALABAMA 403.1 1.59 401.5 52.2 349.3 207.1 77.3 64.3 348.7 0.591 AL ARIZONA 556.6 3.44 553.2 122.9 430.3 218.4 120.0 92.0 430.3 AZ ARKANSAS 217.8 0.03 217.8 43.5 174.3 89.1 44.9 40.3 174.3 AR CALIFORNIA 3,822.4 24.82 3,797.6 1,194.9 2,602.7 1,502.9 502.7 597.2 2,602.7 CA COLORADO 588.1 2.49 585.6 131.6 454.0 219.6 122.4 112.0 454.0 CO CONNECTICUT 429.8 (7.00) 436.8 58.3 378.5 157.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/99socc.pdf
  • 25.5 3.17 0.58 0.59 4.34 21.2GA Hawaii 137.2 86.0 51.3 44.8 6.5 0.70 (1.06) 0.46 0.09 6.4 HI Idaho 25.3 21.5 3.8 1.7 2.2 (1.26) (0.69) (0.41) (2.36) 4.5 ID Illinois 483.7 333.9 149.8 116.6 33.1 1.23 0.54 0.59 2.36 30.8 IL Indiana 273.5 195.8 77.8 59.1 18.7 2.02 (0.37) 0.81 2.45 16.2 IN Iowa 48.7 41.0 7.7 5.1 2.6 (1.59) (0.75) (0.95) (3.29) 5.9 IA Kansas 174.9 75.3 99.6 94.9 4.8 (0.74) (0.03) (0.00) (0.78) 5.5KS Kentucky 135.1 73.8 61.3 49.3 12.0 1.17 0.39 1.55 10.4KY Louisiana 145.4 68.5 76.9 68.5 8.4 (0.21) (0.07) 0.19 (0.10) 8.5 LA Maine 40.7 11.0 29.8 22.0 7.8 0.86 0.06 0.27 1.19 6.6ME Maryland 233.4 113.5 119.9 70.4 49.5 7.24 6.60 5.98 19.82 29.7MD
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Public_Notices/Exparte/1999/exparsbc.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Public_Notices/Exparte/1999/exparsbc.txt
  • 2.94 Missouri $ 16.31 $ 1.36 Nevada $ 2.31 $ 0.19 Ohio $ 26.72 $ 2.23 Oklahoma $ 10.57 $ 0.88 Texas $ 61.48 $ 5.12 Wisconsin $ 14.18 $ 1.18 $ 375.00 $ 31.25 ATTACHMENT A-6 (cont'd) YEAR 3 CIPP CAPS ($M) State Annual Monthly Arkansas $ 8.32 $ 0.69 California $ 158.02 $ 13.17 Connecticut $ 19.12 $ 1.59 Illinois $ 60.82 $ 5.07 Indiana $ 19.42 $ 1.62 Kansas $ 11.78 $ 0.98 Michigan $ 47.10 $ 3.93 Missouri $ 21.75 $ 1.81 Nevada $ 3.08 $ 0.26 Ohio $ 35.62 $ 2.97 Oklahoma $ 14.10 $ 1.18 Texas $ 81.97 $ 6.83 Wisconsin $ 18.90 $ 1.57 $ 500.00 $ 41.67 ATTACHMENT B MODEL COLLOCATION ATTESTATION REPORT
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
  • Report Rate MR-2-02-2341 Network Trouble Report Rate ­ Loop 0.48 0 0.79 0 1.18 1.2 0.23 0 0.36 0 MR-2-03-2341 Network Trouble Report Rate ­ Central Office 0.38 0 0.23 0.65 0.32 1.2 0.27 0 0.36 0 MR-2-04-2341 % Subsequent Reports 21.74 NA 21.43 0 13.16 20 NA NA b,c MR-2-05-2341 % CPE/TOK/FOK Trouble Report Rate 2.42 1.38 2.32 3.25 1.59 0 3.77 5.29 MR-3 ­ Missed Repair Appointments MR-3-01-2341 % Missed Repair Appointment ­ Loop 30 NA 17.65 NA 30.77 0 60 NA 37.5 NA c MR-3-02-2341 % Missed Repair Appointment ­ Central Office 0 NA 40 0 14.29 0 0 NA 25 NA b,c MR-3-03-2341 % CPE/TOK/FOK - Missed Appointment 13.73 0 14 0 8.57 NA 0 0 a,b,d
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-269872A1.html
  • by failing to exhibit all red obstruction lighting on antenna structure # 1059331 from sunset to sunrise. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), that Roy is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of ten thousand dollars ($10,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. Antenna structure #1059331 is located on County Highway 553, 1.59 miles south of Bark River, Michigan. The structure is 145.9 meters (479 feet) in height above ground. Station WMGX, which is licensed to Escanaba License Corp. ("Escanaba"), transmits from the top of the structure. According to the antenna structure registration, the structure is required to have "Obstruction Marking and Lighting" in accordance with paragraphs 3, 4, 5, and 13 of
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-2A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-2A1.pdf
  • 2.87 2.28 2.17 * (69) (57) (104) 2009 2.23 1.49 * 1.53 * (76) (54) (116) Contour Measure 2005 2.04 2.17 2.40 (108) (64) (42) 2007 2.31 2.46 2.51 (98) (73) (59) 2009 1.70 1.76 1.77 (103) (68) (75) Religion Format Market Measure 2005 2.14 1.65 1.30 * (55) (41) (52) 2007 1.53 1.85 1.33 (39) (32) (62) 2009 1.18 1.59 0.88 (34) (36) (57) Contour Measure 2005 1.70 1.55 1.93 (73) (42) (33) 2007 1.19 1.51 1.95 * (53) (40) (40) 2009 0.88 1.22 1.46 * (53) (31) (43) Table 11 (continued) Average Full-Service Commercial FM Stations' Revenue per Adult by Format Year No LPFM One LPFM Two or More LPFM News/Talk/Sports Format Market Measure 2005 3.02 2.35 2.46 (35)
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/pd/pf/TABALL02.pdf
  • 42,929 0.22 0.11 0.09 0.24 7 18 15 15 15Taiwan 2,201 27,413 1 29,615 14,811 0.08 0.06 0.12 0.29 1 19 14 11 8France 13,738 5,778 7,561 27,077 6,581 1.03 0.38 0.29 0.51 7 20 19 26 20India 3,529 23,029 0 26,558 3,121 0.15 0.18 0.40 0.46 7 21 20 20 19Philippines 10,642 8,814 634 20,090 10,754 1.13 1.16 1.11 1.59 6 22 23 21 24Colombia 4,008 6,851 5,220 16,079 2,911 0.33 0.32 0.31 0.58 6 23 22 23 21Venezuela 3,086 5,886 3,717 12,689 20,365 0.32 0.22 0.38 0.70 8 24 21 22 n.a.New Zealand 2,630 3,912 4,095 10,637 2,136 0.33 0.19 0.13 1.63 4 25 n.a. n.a. 27Dominican Republic 3,266 1,643 4,032 8,941 5,846 0.58 2.14 2.15 2.94 7 26
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/pd/pf/csreport_2000.pdf
  • 9,114 373 0.15 0.22 0.82 1.08 1 19 13 14 19Switzerland 2,799 6,235 0 9,034 1,947 0.45 0.30 1.43 1.11 7 20 23 n.a . 21India 1,839 5,920 0 7,759 280 0.31 0.46 1.40 1.77 6 21 20 23 29Argentina 1,041 6,347 151 7,539 8,467 0.16 0.22 0.46 0.76 7 22 17 13 12Philippines 3,862 3,647 2 7,511 1,567 1.06 1.59 2.17 3.42 6 23 21 28 27Colombia 1,699 5,452 142 7,293 7,526 0.30 0.58 1.26 1.52 8 24 n.a . n.a . n.a .New Zealand 827 6,225 31 7,083 124 0.13 0.90 2.16 1.83 6 25 18 16 16Venezuela 1,890 4,896 180 6,966 1,065 0.37 0.70 1.31 1.49 7 26 29 21 24Malaysia 613 5,942 0 6,555 128 0.10 0.25
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files/ITRND01.pdf
  • Revenues of from Billed to Revenues from Revenues Minutes RevenuesForeign Minutes Foreign RevenuesForeign Foreign for all U.S. 4/ Carriers Carriers 6/ Carriers Carriers and Foreign Minutes 1964 20.2 $62.9 $30.3 $32.6 12.0 $19.6 $3.11 $1.50 $1.62 $1.63 $1.62 1965 25.5 78.2 37.2 41.1 15.4 24.7 3.07 1.46 1.61 1.60 1.61 1966 32.3 100.1 47.6 52.5 18.9 30.1 3.10 1.47 1.63 1.59 1.61 1967 39.7 114.2 54.6 59.6 23.4 31.8 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46.4 126.9 61.5 65.4 28.2 40.0 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 64.6 172.0 82.7 89.4 38.3 51.6 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81.1 196.6 98.9 97.7 51.0 59.8 2.43 1.22 1.21 1.17 1.19 1971 100.9 237.4 120.7 116.6 68.4 75.1 2.35 1.20 1.16 1.10
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/peer_review/prlpfm_rpt_economic_study.pdf
  • 2.87 2.28 2.17 * (69) (57) (104) 2009 2.23 1.49 * 1.53 * (76) (54) (116) Contour Measure 2005 2.04 2.17 2.40 (108) (64) (42) 2007 2.31 2.46 2.51 (98) (73) (59) 2009 1.70 1.76 1.77 (103) (68) (75) Religion Format Market Measure 2005 2.14 1.65 1.30 * (55) (41) (52) 2007 1.53 1.85 1.33 (39) (32) (62) 2009 1.18 1.59 0.88 (34) (36) (57) Contour Measure 2005 1.70 1.55 1.93 (73) (42) (33) 2007 1.19 1.51 1.95 * (53) (40) (40) 2009 0.88 1.22 1.46 * (53) (31) (43) Federal Communications Commission DA 12-2 89 Table 11 (continued) Average Full-Service Commercial FM Stations' Revenue per Adult by Format Year No LPFM One LPFM Two or More LPFM News/Talk/Sports Format Market
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/napoli-stmt.pdf
  • Cable Penetration .03 .04 .07 Commercial TV Stations .52** .16 .51 Station Characteristics Station Revenues (000) .00001.00 .14 VHF/UHF (0 = U; 1 = V) .82 .79 .11 Big Four Affiliate (0 = No; 1 = Yes) 3.1* 1.41 .35 Other Net Affiliate (0 = No; 1 = Yes) -.19 1.20 -.02 Local Owner (0 = No; 1 = Yes) 1.59* .79 .20 National Audience Reach (000) .00001.00 .04 Constant -3.67 4.51 Adjusted R2 = .24 (p < .01). * p < .05. ** p < .01. 17 Localism Policy Priorities When we assess these results within the context of the traditional rationales for localism, a number of important points arise. First, there may be little reason to expect localism ­
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
  • 50.0% 17.93 $ 22.41 $ 26.89 $ 31.38 $ 35.86 $ 40.34 $ On-Line 80.0% 28.45 $ 35.56 $ 42.67 $ 49.78 $ 56.90 $ 64.01 $ Sensitivity 100.0% 35.46 $ 44.32 $ 53.19 $ 62.05 $ 70.92 $ 79.78 $ Analysis for Year 2000 Scenario PPPoE 3 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% *High* Percentage of 20.0% 1.27 $ 1.59 $ 1.91 $ 2.23 $ 2.55 $ 2.87 $ (Portland) Subscribers 50.0% 2.58 $ 3.23 $ 3.88 $ 4.52 $ 5.17 $ 5.82 $ On-Line 80.0% 3.90 $ 4.87 $ 5.84 $ 6.82 $ 7.79 $ 8.76 $ 100.0% 4.77 $ 5.96 $ 7.15 $ 8.35 $ 9.54 $ 10.73 $ Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Internet Cable Modem Penetration
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/cpd/forbearance/forbearance-rules.pdf
  • operation of law. 47 C.F.R. § 1.58 Forbearance petition quiet period prohibition. The prohibition in § 1.1203(a) on contacts with decisionmakers concerning matters listed in the Sunshine Agenda shall also apply to a petition for forbearance for a period of 14 days prior to the statutory deadline under 47 U.S.C. 160(c) or as announced by the Commission. 47 C.F.R. § 1.59 Withdrawal or narrowing of petitions for forbearance. (a) A petitioner may withdraw or narrow a petition for forbearance without approval of the Commission by filing a notice of full or partial withdrawal at any time prior to the end of the tenth business day after the due date for reply comments announced in the public notice. (b) Except as provided