FCC Web Documents citing 1.723

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-494A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-494A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-494A1.txt
  • Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 6777, 6780 at ¶ 2 (1998) (subsequent history omitted) (citing S. Rep. No. 580, 95th Cong., 1st Sess. 19, 20 (1977)). Joint Statement at 16, ¶ 44; Response at 8, ¶ 14; 45, ¶ 73. Joint Statement at 16, ¶ 44. Joint Statement at 11, ¶ 30. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1404(a). By contrast, section 1.723(a) of the Commission's rules, which governs formal complaints under section 208 of the Act, specifies that joinder of two or more complainants in one complaint is permitted only ``if their respective causes of action are against the same defendant and concern substantially the same facts and alleged violation of the Communications Act.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.723(a). This proviso does not
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-494A1_Erratum.doc
  • Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 6777, 6780 at ¶ 2 (1998) (subsequent history omitted) (citing S. Rep. No. 580, 95th Cong., 1st Sess. 19, 20 (1977)). Joint Statement at 16, ¶ 44; Response at 8, ¶ 14; 45, ¶ 73. Joint Statement at 16, ¶ 44. Joint Statement at 11, ¶ 30. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1404(a). By contrast, section 1.723(a) of the Commission's rules, which governs formal complaints under section 208 of the Act, specifies that joinder of two or more complainants in one complaint is permitted only ``if their respective causes of action are against the same defendant and concern substantially the same facts and alleged violation of the Communications Act.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.723(a). This proviso does not
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-917A1.pdf
  • requesting provider's provision of mobile data serviceto its 4 own subscribers using a generation of wireless technology comparable to the technology on which the requesting provider seeks to roam. (47 C.F.R. § 20.12(e)(1)) ßA party alleging a violation of this data roaming requirement may file a formal or informal complaint pursuant to the procedures in §§ 1.716-1.718, 1.720, 1.721, and 1.723-1.735. For purposes of section 20.12(e) as referenced above, references to a "carrier" or "common carrier" in the formal and informal complaint procedures that are extended here, as applicable, will mean a provider of commercial mobile data services. ßRegarding data roaming disputes, the Commission will resolve such disputes on a case- by-case basis, taking into consideration the totality of the circumstances
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-1A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-1A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-1A1.txt
  • Rcd at 7601 n.2. Marpin's pleadings on reconsideration, like its original pleadings, also fail to identify any separate violation of section 214, apart from the alleged violation of CW USA's section 214 authorization. The formal complaint rules require a complaint to separately and clearly identify each legal ground on which the complainant's claims are based. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R §§ 1.723(b) (``Two or more grounds of complaint ... should be separately stated and numbered''); 1.720(a) (``Pleadings must be clear, concise and explicit. All matters concerning a claim ... should be pleaded fully and with specificity.''); 1.721(a) (5), (6) (complaints must contain ``[c]itation to the section of the Communications Act and/or order and/or regulation ... alleged to have been violated'' and ``legal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-52A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-52A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-52A1.txt
  • a roaming arrangement on the requesting provider's provision of mobile data service to its own subscribers using a generation of wireless technology comparable to the technology on which the requesting provider seeks to roam. (2) A party alleging a violation of this section may file a formal or informal complaint pursuant to the procedures in §§ 1.716-1.718, 1.720, 1.721, and 1.723-1.735 of this chapter, which sections are incorporated herein. For purposes of section 20.12(e), references to a ``carrier'' or ``common carrier'' in the formal and informal complaint procedures incorporated herein will mean a provider of commercial mobile data services. The Commission will resolve such disputes on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration the totality of the circumstances presented in each case.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/FCC-03-1A1.html
  • Rcd at 7601 n.2. Marpin's pleadings on reconsideration, like its original pleadings, also fail to identify any separate violation of section 214, apart from the alleged violation of CW USA's section 214 authorization. 55 The formal complaint rules require a complaint to separately and clearly identify each legal ground on which the complainant's claims are based. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R 1.723(b) (``Two or more grounds of complaint ... should be separately stated and numbered''); 1.720(a) (``Pleadings must be clear, concise and explicit. All matters concerning a claim ... should be pleaded fully and with specificity.''); 1.721(a) (5), (6) (complaints must contain ``[c]itation to the section of the Communications Act and/or order and/or regulation ... alleged to have been violated'' and ``legal
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/FCC-03-83A1.html
  • decisions. I hope that if the Commission is presented with such an effort to supplant the statutory scheme, we squarely hold that our jurisdiction under section 208 does not authorize such actions. _________________________ 1 47 U.S.C. 208. 2 See Formal Complaint, File No. EB-01-MD-017 (filed Aug. 28, 2001) (``Complaint''). Core and Z-Tel filed the Complaint jointly pursuant to Commission rule 1.723(a). 47 C.F.R. 1.723(a). 3 47 U.S.C. 201(b), 202(a), 252(c)(1), (c)(3). 4 47 C.F. R. 51.309(a), 51.309(b), 51.313(b). 5 Applications of Ameritech Corp., Transferor, and SBC Communications Inc., Transferee, for Consent to Transfer Control of Corporations Holding Commission Licenses and Lines Pursuant to Sections 214 and 310(d) of the Communications Act and Parts 5, 22, 24, 25, 63, 90, 95 and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-494A1.html
  • Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 6777, 6780 at P 2 (1998) (subsequent history omitted) (citing S. Rep. No. 580, 95th Cong., 1st Sess. 19, 20 (1977)). Joint Statement at 16, P 44; Response at 8, P 14; 45, P 73. Joint Statement at 16, P 44. Joint Statement at 11, P 30. 47 C.F.R. S 1.1404(a). By contrast, section 1.723(a) of the Commission's rules, which governs formal complaints under section 208 of the Act, specifies that joinder of two or more complainants in one complaint is permitted only "if their respective causes of action are against the same defendant and concern substantially the same facts and alleged violation of the Communications Act." 47 C.F.R. S 1.723(a). This proviso does not
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/FCC-03-1A1.html
  • Rcd at 7601 n.2. Marpin's pleadings on reconsideration, like its original pleadings, also fail to identify any separate violation of section 214, apart from the alleged violation of CW USA's section 214 authorization. 55 The formal complaint rules require a complaint to separately and clearly identify each legal ground on which the complainant's claims are based. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R 1.723(b) (``Two or more grounds of complaint ... should be separately stated and numbered''); 1.720(a) (``Pleadings must be clear, concise and explicit. All matters concerning a claim ... should be pleaded fully and with specificity.''); 1.721(a) (5), (6) (complaints must contain ``[c]itation to the section of the Communications Act and/or order and/or regulation ... alleged to have been violated'' and ``legal
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/FCC-03-83A1.html
  • decisions. I hope that if the Commission is presented with such an effort to supplant the statutory scheme, we squarely hold that our jurisdiction under section 208 does not authorize such actions. _________________________ 1 47 U.S.C. 208. 2 See Formal Complaint, File No. EB-01-MD-017 (filed Aug. 28, 2001) (``Complaint''). Core and Z-Tel filed the Complaint jointly pursuant to Commission rule 1.723(a). 47 C.F.R. 1.723(a). 3 47 U.S.C. 201(b), 202(a), 252(c)(1), (c)(3). 4 47 C.F. R. 51.309(a), 51.309(b), 51.313(b). 5 Applications of Ameritech Corp., Transferor, and SBC Communications Inc., Transferee, for Consent to Transfer Control of Corporations Holding Commission Licenses and Lines Pursuant to Sections 214 and 310(d) of the Communications Act and Parts 5, 22, 24, 25, 63, 90, 95 and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-494A1.html
  • Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 6777, 6780 at P 2 (1998) (subsequent history omitted) (citing S. Rep. No. 580, 95th Cong., 1st Sess. 19, 20 (1977)). Joint Statement at 16, P 44; Response at 8, P 14; 45, P 73. Joint Statement at 16, P 44. Joint Statement at 11, P 30. 47 C.F.R. S 1.1404(a). By contrast, section 1.723(a) of the Commission's rules, which governs formal complaints under section 208 of the Act, specifies that joinder of two or more complainants in one complaint is permitted only "if their respective causes of action are against the same defendant and concern substantially the same facts and alleged violation of the Communications Act." 47 C.F.R. S 1.723(a). This proviso does not