FCC Web Documents citing 1.731

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2079A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2079A1.pdf
  • text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit ð ð ð Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of APCC Services, Inc., Data Net Systems, LLC, Davel Communications, Inc., Jaroth, Inc. d/b/a Pacific Telemanagement Services, and Intera Communications Corp., Complainants, v. ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-03-MD-011 ) ) REDACTS Information Designated ) as Confidential Under 47 C.F.R. § 1.731 ) ) ) ) ) NetworkIP, LLC, and Network Enhanced Telecom, LLP, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ORDER Adopted: May 21, 2007 Released: May 21, 2007 By the Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we deny a motion filed by defendants NetworkIP, LLC and Network Enhanced Services, LLP (collectively, ``Network'') to stay pending appeal the effect
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-477A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-477A1.pdf
  • OTHER MATTERS 29. Complainants filed a letter requesting clarification on 11 issues in the instant proceeding, a motion to strike, and a motion requesting the Commission's adjudication of this complaint. We find that the resolution of this proceeding as stated herein renders those filings moot, and we therefore deny each of them. 30. As to Defendants' confidentiality claim under section 1.731 of the Commission's rules for certain documents that Defendants filed in Response to Complainants First and Second Set of Interrogatories, we are persuaded that the documents relating to brand names and trademarks in Exhibits A-C of Defendants' response meet the disclosure exemption under 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(4) of the Freedom of Information Act (``FOIA''). First, Defendants argue that Verizon's Brand
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-270A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-270A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-270A1.txt
  • then the Commission may proceed on the basis of the best information available to it from whatever source derived. 6. Ex Parte Status; Confidentiality of Information. These proceedings are restricted for ex parte purposes. Therefore, ex parte presentations are prohibited. Parties seeking to protect the confidentiality of information produced or exchanged shall follow the procedures set forth in Commission rule 1.731, substituting the phrase ``this proceeding'' for ``formal complaint proceeding.'' By the Chief, Common Carrier Bureau. News Media contact: Michael Balmoris (202)418-1500 FCC Common Carrier Bureau contacts: Katherine Farroba (202)418-1580, Jeffrey Dygert (202)418-7300 See Petition of WorldCom, Inc. for Preemption of Jurisdiction of the Virginia State Corporation Commission Pursuant to Section 252(e)(5) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and for Arbitration
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2733A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2733A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2733A1.txt
  • then the Commission may proceed on the basis of the best information available to it from whatever source derived. 6. Ex Parte Status; Confidentiality of Information. These proceedings are restricted for ex parte purposes. Therefore, ex parte presentations are prohibited. Parties seeking to protect the confidentiality of information produced or exchanged shall follow the procedures set forth in Commission rule 1.731, substituting the phrase ``this proceeding'' for ``formal complaint proceeding.'' By the Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau. News Media contact: Michael Balmoris (202) 418-1500 FCC Wireline Competition Bureau contacts: Jeremy Miller (202) 418-1580 Richard Lerner (202) 418-1500 ATTACHMENT Cavalier/Verizon Virginia Arbitration Schedule Day Date Action 0 Friday, August 1, 2003 Cavalier Files Petition 35 Friday, September 5 Verizon files Response and Additional
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.txt
  • common carrier pursuant to section 208 of the Communications Act (47 U.S.C. 208) alleging a violation of the Communications Act. Need: These rules result in the effective, efficient, and timely resolution of formal complaints. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(u)(j), 208, 303(r). Section Number and Title: 1.720 General pleading requirements. 1.724 Answers. 1.726 Replies. 1.727 Motions. 1.729 Interrogatories to parties. 1.731 Confidentiality of information produced through discovery. 1.732 Other required written submissions. 1.733 Status conference. 1.734 Specification as to pleadings, briefs, and other documents; subscription. 1.735 Copies; service; separate filings against multiple defendants. Brief Description: Directions on how to file applications, including the place of filing, the amount of fees, who may sign the application, and the number of copies required.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2079A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2079A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2079A1.txt
  • text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit ð ð ð Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of APCC Services, Inc., Data Net Systems, LLC, Davel Communications, Inc., Jaroth, Inc. d/b/a Pacific Telemanagement Services, and Intera Communications Corp., Complainants, v. ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-03-MD-011 ) ) REDACTS Information Designated ) as Confidential Under 47 C.F.R. § 1.731 ) ) ) ) ) NetworkIP, LLC, and Network Enhanced Telecom, LLP, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ORDER Adopted: May 21, 2007 Released: May 21, 2007 By the Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we deny a motion filed by defendants NetworkIP, LLC and Network Enhanced Services, LLP (collectively, ``Network'') to stay pending appeal the effect
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1880A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1880A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1880A1.txt
  • then the Commission may proceed on the basis of the best information available to it from whatever source derived. 6. Ex Parte Status; Confidentiality of Information. These proceedings are restricted for ex parte purposes. Therefore, ex parte presentations are prohibited. Parties seeking to protect the confidentiality of information produced or exchanged shall follow the procedures set forth in Commission rule 1.731, substituting the phrase ``this proceeding'' for ``formal complaint proceeding.'' By the Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau. News Media contact: Mark Wigfield (202) 418-1500 Wireline Competition Bureau contact: Christi Shewman (202) 418-1686 See Petition of Intrado Communications of Virginia Inc. Pursuant to Section 252(e)(5) of the Communications Act for Preemption of Jurisdiction of the Virginia State Corporation Commission Regarding Arbitration of an
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2680A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2680A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2680A1.txt
  • then the Commission may proceed on the basis of the best information available to it from whatever source derived. 6. Ex Parte Status; Confidentiality of Information. These proceedings are restricted for ex parte purposes. Therefore, ex parte presentations are prohibited. Parties seeking to protect the confidentiality of information produced or exchanged shall follow the procedures set forth in Commission rule 1.731, substituting the phrase ``this proceeding'' for ``formal complaint proceeding.'' By the Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau. News Media contact: Mark Wigfield (202) 418-1500 Wireline Competition Bureau contact: Stephanie Weiner (202) 418-1553 See Petition of Intrado Communications of Virginia Inc. Pursuant to Section 252(e)(5) of the Communications Act for Preemption of Jurisdiction of the Virginia State Corporation Commission Regarding Arbitration of an
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-477A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-477A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-477A1.txt
  • OTHER MATTERS 29. Complainants filed a letter requesting clarification on 11 issues in the instant proceeding, a motion to strike, and a motion requesting the Commission's adjudication of this complaint. We find that the resolution of this proceeding as stated herein renders those filings moot, and we therefore deny each of them. 30. As to Defendants' confidentiality claim under section 1.731 of the Commission's rules for certain documents that Defendants filed in Response to Complainants First and Second Set of Interrogatories, we are persuaded that the documents relating to brand names and trademarks in Exhibits A-C of Defendants' response meet the disclosure exemption under 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(4) of the Freedom of Information Act (``FOIA''). First, Defendants argue that Verizon's Brand
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284321A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284321A2.txt
  • 0.113.612.919.0 54.5 Kazakhstan $5,408,598 0.117.1 5.321.9 55.7 $35,493 0.0 0.0 0.066.0 34.0 $27 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 47,782,951 0.1 6.8 6.828.2 58.1 Kyrgyzstan $1,807,656 0.020.3 1.140.3 38.3 $34,816 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $59 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 18,600,611 0.019.4 1.345.4 33.9 Latvia $3,690,931 0.1 9.6 0.616.1 73.6 $68,828 0.0 0.0 0.014.8 85.2 $293 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 19,899,894 0.1 7.5 1.731.3 59.4 Lithuania $3,914,239 0.122.9 1.518.7 56.8 $89,922 0.0 0.9 0.022.8 76.3 $12,753 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 33,578,978 0.016.2 1.327.5 54.9 Moldova $3,291,183 0.034.6 2.416.5 46.5 $50,477 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $1,513 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 20,923,875 0.029.9 3.820.8 45.5 Poland $28,627,708 0.016.8 2.021.0 60.1 $265,401 0.021.4 0.027.3 51.3 $12,772 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 95.0 629,521,883 0.0 5.0 5.720.3 69.0 Romania
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-278A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-278A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-278A1.txt
  • a tariff revision filed in compliance with relevant requirements of the Commission's rules, effective June 9, 2005. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Confidential Appendix Not Included in Public Files Complaint of AT&T Corp. v. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., File No. EB-04-MD-010 (filed July 1, 2004) (``Complaint''). 47 U.S.C. § 208. 47 U.S.C. §§ 201(b), 202(a), 272. Pursuant to section 1.731 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.731, Commission staff entered a Protective Order limiting the disclosure of sensitive business information that either AT&T or BellSouth designated as confidential (``Confidential Information"). AT&T Corp. v. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., File No. EB-04-MD-010, Letter Ruling (July 8, 2004) (``Protective Order''). Pursuant to that Protective Order, this public version of the Memorandum Opinion and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.txt
  • Land_Area_uc 0.00647 0.0223 -0.0051 -0.0614 -0.216 -0.0178 0.0292 0.145 -0.0146 -0.109 -0.104 -0.297 (0.10) (0.21) (-0.02) (-0.22) (-1.41) (-0.12) (0.15) (0.72) (-0.13) (-0 .86) (-0.71) (-0.98) Land_Area_ua -0.101 0.137 0.596 0.265 -0.0041 -0.289* 0.0983 0.219 0.169 0.482 -0.384** -0.467 (-1.49) (0.72) (1.19) (0.48) (-0.02) (-2.33) (0.24) (0.68) (1.36) (1.86 ) (-2.59) (-0.95) Percent_Water 0.866*** -0.0712 -0.434 -1.103 0.299 -0.244 0.808 1.731* 0.577 -0.821 - 0.246 -0.0843 (3.31) (-0.19) (-0.36) (-0.91) (0.38) (-0.54) (0.86) (2.53) (1.03) (-1. 37) (-0.31) (-0.05) Census_Blocs_nu 0.134* 0.200* 0.228 0.297 0.0559 0.113 -0.129 0.135 0.17 6 0.0630 0.0840 -0.259 (2.44) (2.37) (1.27) (1.53) (0.58) (1.05) (-0.77) (0.87) (1.69) (0.53) (0.91) (-1.01) Census_Blocs_nu -0.252** -0.318** -0.341 -0.388 0.0386 -0.0340 -0.0735 - 0.325 -0.251 -0.246 -0.297 -0.0890 (-2.72) (-2.89)
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99181.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99181.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99181.wp
  • the record before us that the type of business information that may be submitted by companies to support a readily achievable defense is so unique as to require additional protective measures. 161. Moreover, we note that in the context of formal complaint actions, in which relevant information or material designated as confidential must be produced to the opposing party, section 1.731 of our rules places very specific requirements and limitations on the use of information or materials. Section 1.731 makes it clear that confidential or proprietary information may not be used for any purpose other than prosecuting or defending the complaint at issue, or disclosed to any employees other than those directly involved in such prosecution or defense. The rule further
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Comments/fcc98055/210102-1.pdf
  • days set forth in the Notice. Providing additional time will better enable companies to respond, while also still facilitating a rapid resolution of any Section 255 complaints under a "fast track" process. With respect to the proposed new complaint process, Nortel also urges the Commission to adopt procedures to ensure the confidentiality of proprietary information 16 Cf., 47 C.F.R. § 1.731. 17 E.g., Notice at ¶¶ 99, 110, 122 and 164. 18 Notice at ¶ 100. that may be provided in response to the complaint.16 Nortel anticipates that a Section 255 complaint proceeding likely will involve review of highly sensitive information of the manufacturer, such as research and development procedures, the specific costs of particular products and the manufacturer's design or
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Comments/fcc98055/210104-1.pdf
  • variety of entities, including potential competitors. 67 See NPRM ¶ 153. 68 See discussion of "readily achievable" standards, Section III infra. -55- The FCC requested comment on ways to protect the confidentiality of information provided during the complaint process, referencing confidentiality protections provided in its regulations in connection with FOIA requests and discovery. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.457(d), 0.457(g) and 1.731. Section 1.731 limits disclosure of information obtained through discovery, that is designated proprietary, to particular persons for use only in the complaint proceedings, and only to the extent necessary to assist in prosecution or defense of such complaint. However, § 1.731 places the burden of proof on the party designating documents as proprietary to prove they are such if challenged.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/FCC-04-278A1.html
  • through a tariff revision filed in compliance with relevant requirements of the Commission's rules, effective June 9, 2005. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Confidential Appendix Not Included in Public Files _________________________ 1Complaint of AT&T Corp. v. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., File No. EB-04-MD-010 (filed July 1, 2004) (``Complaint''). 247 U.S.C. 208. 347 U.S.C. 201(b), 202(a), 272. 4Pursuant to section 1.731 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.731, Commission staff entered a Protective Order limiting the disclosure of sensitive business information that either AT&T or BellSouth designated as confidential (``Confidential Information"). AT&T Corp. v. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., File No. EB-04-MD-010, Letter Ruling (July 8, 2004) (``Protective Order''). Pursuant to that Protective Order, this public version of the Memorandum Opinion and Order
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-2079A1.html
  • Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version. ***************************************************************** Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 ) ) ) ) In the Matter of ) File No. EB-03-MD-011 APCC Services, Inc., Data Net Systems, LLC, ) Davel Communications, Inc., Jaroth, Inc. d/b/a Pacific Telemanagement Services, and ) REDACTS Information Intera Communications Corp., Designated Complainants, ) as Confidential Under 47 C.F.R. S 1.731 v. ) ) ) ) ) ) NetworkIP, LLC, and Network Enhanced Telecom, LLP, ) Defendants. ) ) ORDER Adopted: May 21, 2007 Released: May 21, 2007 By the Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we deny a motion filed by defendants NetworkIP, LLC and Network Enhanced Services, LLP (collectively, "Network") to stay pending appeal
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-477A1.html
  • OTHER MATTERS 29. Complainants filed a letter requesting clarification on 11 issues in the instant proceeding, a motion to strike, and a motion requesting the Commission's adjudication of this complaint. We find that the resolution of this proceeding as stated herein renders those filings moot, and we therefore deny each of them. 30. As to Defendants' confidentiality claim under section 1.731 of the Commission's rules for certain documents that Defendants filed in Response to Complainants First and Second Set of Interrogatories, we are persuaded that the documents relating to brand names and trademarks in Exhibits A-C of Defendants' response meet the disclosure exemption under 5 U.S.C. S: 552(b)(4) of the Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA"). First, Defendants argue that Verizon's Brand
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99181.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99181.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99181.wp
  • the record before us that the type of business information that may be submitted by companies to support a readily achievable defense is so unique as to require additional protective measures. 161. Moreover, we note that in the context of formal complaint actions, in which relevant information or material designated as confidential must be produced to the opposing party, section 1.731 of our rules places very specific requirements and limitations on the use of information or materials. Section 1.731 makes it clear that confidential or proprietary information may not be used for any purpose other than prosecuting or defending the complaint at issue, or disclosed to any employees other than those directly involved in such prosecution or defense. The rule further
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/4361-f02.pdf
  • 0.0 2.2 1.6 0.0 86,616,56312.311.2 1.039.436.1 Mozambique $1,627,79887.0 9.4 0.1 1.7 1.8 $50,395100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $111,73680.119.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,987,97861.527.2 0.7 5.2 5.5 Namibia $591,07064.321.6 0.4 7.8 5.9 $94,960100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $207,32298.9 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 2,837,69860.323.1 0.7 7.7 8.3 Niger $718,426 1.412.0 1.012.173.4 $516 0.0 0.0100.0 0.0 0.0 $0 3,516,932 0.3 9.6 1.212.976.0 Nigeria $28,540,93234.420.8 1.731.112.0 $3,349,40017.615.4 0.055.811.2 $1,883,92867.016.9 1.115.0 0.0 103,943,34211.220.2 2.248.517.9 Reunion $76,856 1.225.1 1.619.752.3 $73 0.0 0.0100.0 0.0 0.0 $1,37746.7 0.053.3 0.0 0.0 771,482 0.315.8 1.249.133.6 Rwanda $448,973 0.126.0 1.365.4 7.1 $132,870 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 0.0 $184,388 0.5 0.0 0.998.7 0.0 1,327,689 0.041.4 3.241.913.4 Saint Helena $189,96110.750.9 0.136.0 2.4 $0 $0 269,461 3.747.2 0.145.1 3.8 Sao Tome and Principe $1,145,503 2.460.6 3.619.214.2 $0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/97socc.pdf
  • 263.3 0.101 0.101 0.101 HI IDAHO 185.2 185.2 185.2 ID ILLINOIS 2,521.2 2,521.2 2,521.2 0.001 0.001 0.001 IL INDIANA 1,001.4 1,001.4 1,001.4 0.001 0.001 0.001 IN IOWA 345.8 345.8 345.8 0.001 0.001 0.001 IA KANSAS 398.0 398.0 398.0 KS KENTUCKY 622.1 622.1 622.1 0.002 0.002 0.002 KY LOUISIANA 882.9 0.002 882.9 882.9 LA MAINE 171.6 171.6 171.6 ME MARYLAND 1,191.0 1.731 1,189.3 1,189.3 MD MASSACHUSETTS 1,404.7 1,404.7 1,404.7 MA MICHIGAN 1,674.6 1,674.6 1,674.6 MI MINNESOTA 728.6 728.6 728.6 MN MISSISSIPPI 551.8 551.8 551.8 MS MISSOURI 1,007.8 1,007.8 1,007.8 MO MONTANA 113.2 113.2 113.2 MT NEBRASKA 313.0 0.978 312.0 311.7 0.326 NE NEVADA 269.5 269.5 269.5 NV NEW HAMPSHIRE 228.0 228.0 228.0 NH NEW JERSEY 1,474.0 1.620 1,472.4 1,472.4 NJ NEW MEXICO
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Comments/fcc98055/210102-1.pdf
  • days set forth in the Notice. Providing additional time will better enable companies to respond, while also still facilitating a rapid resolution of any Section 255 complaints under a "fast track" process. With respect to the proposed new complaint process, Nortel also urges the Commission to adopt procedures to ensure the confidentiality of proprietary information 16 Cf., 47 C.F.R. § 1.731. 17 E.g., Notice at ¶¶ 99, 110, 122 and 164. 18 Notice at ¶ 100. that may be provided in response to the complaint.16 Nortel anticipates that a Section 255 complaint proceeding likely will involve review of highly sensitive information of the manufacturer, such as research and development procedures, the specific costs of particular products and the manufacturer's design or
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Comments/fcc98055/210104-1.pdf
  • variety of entities, including potential competitors. 67 See NPRM ¶ 153. 68 See discussion of "readily achievable" standards, Section III infra. -55- The FCC requested comment on ways to protect the confidentiality of information provided during the complaint process, referencing confidentiality protections provided in its regulations in connection with FOIA requests and discovery. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.457(d), 0.457(g) and 1.731. Section 1.731 limits disclosure of information obtained through discovery, that is designated proprietary, to particular persons for use only in the complaint proceedings, and only to the extent necessary to assist in prosecution or defense of such complaint. However, § 1.731 places the burden of proof on the party designating documents as proprietary to prove they are such if challenged.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/FCC-04-278A1.html
  • through a tariff revision filed in compliance with relevant requirements of the Commission's rules, effective June 9, 2005. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Confidential Appendix Not Included in Public Files _________________________ 1Complaint of AT&T Corp. v. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., File No. EB-04-MD-010 (filed July 1, 2004) (``Complaint''). 247 U.S.C. 208. 347 U.S.C. 201(b), 202(a), 272. 4Pursuant to section 1.731 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.731, Commission staff entered a Protective Order limiting the disclosure of sensitive business information that either AT&T or BellSouth designated as confidential (``Confidential Information"). AT&T Corp. v. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., File No. EB-04-MD-010, Letter Ruling (July 8, 2004) (``Protective Order''). Pursuant to that Protective Order, this public version of the Memorandum Opinion and Order
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-2079A1.html
  • Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version. ***************************************************************** Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 ) ) ) ) In the Matter of ) File No. EB-03-MD-011 APCC Services, Inc., Data Net Systems, LLC, ) Davel Communications, Inc., Jaroth, Inc. d/b/a Pacific Telemanagement Services, and ) REDACTS Information Intera Communications Corp., Designated Complainants, ) as Confidential Under 47 C.F.R. S 1.731 v. ) ) ) ) ) ) NetworkIP, LLC, and Network Enhanced Telecom, LLP, ) Defendants. ) ) ORDER Adopted: May 21, 2007 Released: May 21, 2007 By the Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we deny a motion filed by defendants NetworkIP, LLC and Network Enhanced Services, LLP (collectively, "Network") to stay pending appeal
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-477A1.html
  • OTHER MATTERS 29. Complainants filed a letter requesting clarification on 11 issues in the instant proceeding, a motion to strike, and a motion requesting the Commission's adjudication of this complaint. We find that the resolution of this proceeding as stated herein renders those filings moot, and we therefore deny each of them. 30. As to Defendants' confidentiality claim under section 1.731 of the Commission's rules for certain documents that Defendants filed in Response to Complainants First and Second Set of Interrogatories, we are persuaded that the documents relating to brand names and trademarks in Exhibits A-C of Defendants' response meet the disclosure exemption under 5 U.S.C. S: 552(b)(4) of the Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA"). First, Defendants argue that Verizon's Brand
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files06/CREPOR06.PDF
  • 0.113.612.919.0 54.5 Kazakhstan $5,408,598 0.117.1 5.321.9 55.7 $35,493 0.0 0.0 0.066.0 34.0 $27 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 47,782,951 0.1 6.8 6.828.2 58.1 Kyrgyzstan $1,807,656 0.020.3 1.140.3 38.3 $34,816 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $59 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 18,600,611 0.019.4 1.345.4 33.9 Latvia $3,690,931 0.1 9.6 0.616.1 73.6 $68,828 0.0 0.0 0.014.8 85.2 $293 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 19,899,894 0.1 7.5 1.731.3 59.4 Lithuania $3,914,239 0.122.9 1.518.7 56.8 $89,922 0.0 0.9 0.022.8 76.3 $12,753 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 33,578,978 0.016.2 1.327.5 54.9 Moldova $3,291,183 0.034.6 2.416.5 46.5 $50,477 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $1,513 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 20,923,875 0.029.9 3.820.8 45.5 Poland $28,627,708 0.016.8 2.021.0 60.1 $265,401 0.021.4 0.027.3 51.3 $12,772 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 95.0 629,521,883 0.0 5.0 5.720.3 69.0 Romania