FCC Web Documents citing 1.917

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-132A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-132A1.pdf
  • ``Licensees must file maps and other supporting documents showing compliance with the respective construction requirements within the appropriate five- and ten-year benchmarks of the date of their initial licenses.'' 47 C.F.R. � 24.203(c). See, e.g., Cellular South 700 MHz Further Notice Comments at 5. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. � 1.17 (Truthful and accurate statements to the Commission); 47 C.F.R. � 1.917 (``Willful false statements made therein, however, are punishable by fine and imprisonment, 18 U.S.C. 1001, and by appropriate administrative sanctions, including revocation of station license pursuant to 312(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.''). We decline to adopt the suggestion from RTG that we define a bright line test for what constitutes sufficient signal strength, because we will
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-230A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-230A1.pdf
  • is consistent with the performance benchmarks and requirements that we propose above. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. � 1.946. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.946(d) (``The notification must be filed with Commission within 15 days of the expiration of the applicable construction or coverage period.''). See, e.g., 47 C.F. R. � 1.17 (Truthful and accurate statements to the Commission); 47 C.F.R. � 1.917 (``Willful false statements made therein, however, are punishable by fine and imprisonment, 18 U.S.C. 1001, and by appropriate administrative sanctions, including revocation of station license pursuant to 312(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.''). See, e.g., AASHTO Comments at 11; APCO Comments at 30; Council Tree Comments at 19; Ericsson Comments at 26; NENA Comments at 2; PSST
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-220A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-220A1.txt
  • 2 Since the Petitioners' filing, the former Land Mobile Branch of the Licensing Division of the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau was reorganized into the Licensing and Technical Analysis Branch of the Commercial Wireless Division of the Wireless TelecommunicationsBureau. 3 Petition for Reccnsiderationfiled on July 12, 1996 by Thelma Lucas, Brenda Porte, et al. 2689 Federal Communications Commission DA 00-220 application.4 Section 1.917 of the Commission's rules states that an application must be signed by one of the partners if the applicant is a partnership.5 Because the license for WPDU965 was authorized under a partnership classification, we believe the partnership agreement clearly demonstrates that Grincewicz was a partner and, therefore, had authority to sign the modification application. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2565A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2565A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2565A1.txt
  • the following address: FCC, Attention: Trunking License Correction, 1270 Fairfield Road, Gettysburg, PA 17325-7245. Licensees may request the conversion of multiple licenses in a single request. The letter request must include the licensee's name, contact phone number, the call sign(s) of all licenses to be converted (listed alphabetically), and the signature of the applicant as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.917. In order to maintain the necessary distinction between licenses previously granted with a trunked radio service code and those licenses being modified under the above procedure, the Commission will, prior to acting on the letter requests, update its database to reflect a FB8 station class code on all licenses that currently specify a trunked radio service code. This update will
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2503A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2503A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2503A1.txt
  • MHz Service). U.S. Telemetry requested a waiver of Section 1.913(a) of our Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.913(a), to the extent needed for acceptance of the Step 1 application because the application is signed by the Trustee rather than an officer, director or duly authorized employee of TV Active. Cover Letter to U.S. Telemetry Applications at 7. However, it is Section 1.917(a), 47 C.F.R. � 1.917(a), that governs who may sign FCC applications. Since the Trustee does not fit squarely into any of the enumerated classes of eligible signatories, we will grant a waiver of Section 1.917. This comports with the waiver granted by the Commission in Arecibo. See � 18, supra. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 01-2503
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2504A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2504A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2504A1.txt
  • right to apply for the assignment of licenses, authorized the Trustee to file assignment applications for these licenses. Commission precedent allows us to defer to the Court's decision in this regard. Therefore, the Syn-Tel assignment applications were signed by a party who was not authorized to seek assignment of the licenses. The lack of a valid authorized signature violates Section 1.917 of our Rules. Thus, the Syn-Tel applications are subject to dismissal for this failure to comply with Section 1.917. Accordingly, our decision here is supported by Commission precedent and comports with our rules. We note that both the Wincom bankruptcy estate and Interactive filed elections for these licenses pursuant to the restructuring plan for the 218-219 MHz Service. Both elected
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-37A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-37A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-37A1.txt
  • we dismiss the petition for reconsideration. Background. On March 17, 2000 Hard Rock submitted its application requesting use of three frequency pairs in the 450-470 MHz band at two locations in the Las Vegas, Nevada area. On August 2, 2000, the Branch dismissed Hard Rock's application because the application did not bear an original handwritten signature in accordance with Section 1.917 of the Commission's Rules. On August 14, 2000 Hard Rock sent a letter to the Commission's Gettysburg, Pennsylvania office requesting reconsideration of the August 2 action. Discussion. We will dismiss Hard Rock's petition because it was not filed at the correct location. Section 1.106(i) of the Commission's Rules provides that a petition for reconsideration must be submitted to the Secretary,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-527A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-527A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-527A1.txt
  • on September 24, 1999. Id. See Requests at 1 citing Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture of International Business Machines, Order, 15 FCC Rcd 10393 (2000) (Enforcement Order). See Enforcement Order, 15 FCC Rcd 10393, 10394 � 4. See 47 U.S.C. � 310(d) Requests at 2. See FCC Form 1046. Requests at 2. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.948(a); 1.948(c); 1.907; 1.917(a); 1.917(b). Requests at 2. IBM states that the IBM employees who signed Form 1046 were former employees of Lotus and Sequent, as applicable, with direct knowledge of the stations, and the persons likely to have signed Form 1046 for Lotus and Sequent, as applicable, had timely applications been filed before IBM acquired each licensee. Id. See Letter from James M.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1929A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1929A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1929A1.txt
  • the Overlook objection can not form the basis for dismissal of his application. Based on our review of the record, we find that the Division's dismissal of Mr. Ryan's applications was correct. As filed, the application containing the renewal request was defective and could not be granted. Mr. Ryan was not the proper entity to sign the renewal application. Section 1.917 of the Commission's Rules and the instructions for completing Form 600 clearly state that only those parties listed may sign a license application. A proposed assignee is not among those individuals who may sign an application for renewal of license. Accordingly, the Form 600 application was defective to the extent that it sought renewal because it was not signed by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-20A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-20A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-20A1.txt
  • to a third party, CELSMER, the geographic licensee for the same frequencies in the Orlando, FL Metropolitan Trading Area (MTA), which includes Bithlo City. The Licensing and Technical Analysis Branch (Branch) of the Commercial Wireless Division consented to the assignment on July 18, 1997. CELSMER cancelled its authorization for call sign WNVE296 on April 24, 2001. III. Discussion 6. Section 1.917(a)(3) of the Commission's rules requires an ``officer, director, or duly authorized employee'' to sign an application when the applicant is a corporation. The dispute concerning who is the rightful licensee of Station WNVE296 arises out of a disagreement between Dawson and ANCC concerning Robert Eaton's authority to sign the June 1993 assignment application on behalf of ANCC. In setting aside
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2751A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2751A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2751A1.txt
  • or forfeiture. Renewal expiration date refers to the date the license expires absent the filing of a timely renewal application. Applies to Table C and D only. For example, the licensee or applicant could submit a copy of the authorization containing the disputed information. See 47 C.F.R. �� 21.303, 74.932(d). Authorized representative refers to persons listed in 47 C.F.R. � 1.917 (e.g. individual, partner, corporate officer or director etc.). See 47 C.F.R. �� 21.28(d), 73.3568(a)(1). PUBLIC NOTICE Approved by OMB 3060-0893 Estimated time per response: .50 hours Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 8 ��PNG r v ��"r�9 I'6� �d�Y�͆aX ���; Wh� �X,�aX���y�]\\.W`h���va6l! �v"]�V�at�������-``````�"m(c)x<��G�<���={-N��J%t�<== �"""x ҍ� � ��(c)���!��'' �R)&� �A�� "���\��v`` � 6� �� ( y �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-252A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-252A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-252A1.txt
  • listed under section 1.9139(d) of the Commission's rules. In these instances, FCC Form 603-T may be submitted either electronically or manually. In the Matter of Promoting Efficient Use of Spectrum Through Elimination of Barriers to the Development of Secondary Markets, Memorandum Opinion and Order, DA 04-239 (rel. Jan. 30, 2004) (Spectrum Leasing Interim Process Implementation Order). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.917(d). Id., � 5. The Bureau will release a public notice once amendments to Form 603-T can be submitted electronically via ULS. Id. Id., � 4. If a filing is submitted manually, it will be available via ULS Application Search once Bureau staff have entered the filing into ULS. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2987A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2987A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2987A1.txt
  • Collection Improvement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321, 1358 (1996)). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.1112. Applicants that have their long-form applications dismissed will be deemed to have defaulted and will be subject to default payments under 47 C.F.R. �� 1.2104(g) and 1.2109(c). 47 C.F.R. � 1.2110(c)(2). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.917. 47 C.F.R. � 1.65. For example, if ownership changes result in the attribution of new interest holders that affect the applicant's qualifications for a new entrant bidding credit, such information must be clearly stated in the applicant's notification. See Liberty Productions, 16 FCC Rcd at 12078. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105(b)(2). 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105(a). 47 C.F.R. � 73.3573(f)(4). In
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3022A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3022A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3022A1.txt
  • ATU License Correction, 1270 Fairfield Road, Gettysburg, PA 17325-7245 by January 31, 2006. Licensees may request the conversion of multiple licenses in a single request. The letter request must include the licensee's name, contact phone number, the call sign(s) of all licenses to be converted (listed alphabetically), location(s) and frequency(ies), and the signature of the applicant as required by Section 1.917 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.917. We will also accept a marked-up copy of the current authorization indicating the information above along with a letter requesting the changes be made. Requests not meeting these requirements will be dismissed or granted in part as deemed appropriate. Alternatively, licensees may request to have the station class codes changed if they
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3126A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3126A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3126A1.txt
  • 2005). AWS Allocation Eighth Report and Order, Fifth NPRM, and Order, � 53 (notes omitted). The Commission also noted that the information submitted need not be signed under oath; however, willful false statements made therein are punishable by fine and imprisonment, and by appropriate administrative sanctions, including revocation of a station's license. See id. at n.139 (citing 47 C.F.R. � 1.917(c)). Id. Id. Licensees may make minor modifications to station authorizations, as defined in �1.929 of this part (other than pro forma transfers and assignments), as a matter of right without prior Commission approval. Where other rule parts permit licensees to make permissive changes to technical parameters without notifying the Commission (e.g., adding, modifying, or deleting internal sites), no notification is
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1272A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1272A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1272A1.txt
  • 154(i)). Id., 2005 Commission Order. See also 70 Fed. Reg. 61747 (Oct. 26, 2005). Id. The Commission also noted that the information submitted need not be signed under oath; however, willful false statements made therein are punishable by fine and imprisonment, and by appropriate administrative sanctions, including revocation of a station's license. See id. at n.139 (citing 47 C.F.R. � 1.917(c)). Licensees of Broadband Radio Service Channels 1 and/or 2/2A Must File Site and Technical Data by December 27, 2005, Public Notice, DA 05-3126, 20 FCC Rcd 19273 (OET&WTB 2005) (First BRS Data Collection PN). See 2005 Commission Order, 20 FCC Rcd at 15890-91, 15893 �� 53, 66. The new or revised information collections contained in the Second Data Collection were
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1591A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1591A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1591A1.txt
  • Implementation of the Commercial Spectrum Enhancement Act and Modernization of the Commission's Competitive Bidding Rules and Procedures, WT Docket No. 05-211, Memorandum Opinion and Order, DA 06-1281 (rel. June 16, 2006) (``MO&O''). See MO&O at � 5. Id. Id. at � 4. Id. Id. at n.6. or through the FCC's Fax Information System at (202) 418-0177. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.917(d). 47 C.F.R. � 1.2114(d). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 hSp � � � � � � ��PNG r v ��"r�9 I'6� �d�Y�͆aX ���; Wh� �X,�aX���y�]\\.W`h���va6l! �v"]�V�at�������-``````�"m(c)x<��G�<���={-N��J%t�<== �"""x ҍ� � ��(c)���!��'' �R)&� �A�� "���\��v`` � 6� �� _H _H � Sp m �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1949A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1949A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1949A1.txt
  • applications dismissed will be deemed to have defaulted and will be subject to default payments under 47 C.F.R. �� 1.2104(g) and 1.2109(c). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.2110(c)(3). Designated entities are defined as small businesses, businesses owned by members of minority groups and/or women, and rural telephone companies. 47 C.F.R. � 1.2110(a). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.917; see also 47 C.F.R. � 73.3513. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.65. For example, if ownership changes result in the attribution of new interest holders that affect the applicant's qualifications for a new entrant bidding credit, such information must be clearly stated in the bidder's amendment. See Liberty Productions, 16 FCC Rcd at 12078. Events occurring after the short-form filing deadline,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2014A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2014A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2014A1.txt
  • applications dismissed will be deemed to have defaulted and will be subject to default payments under 47 C.F.R. �� 1.2104(g) and 1.2109(c). 47 C.F.R. � 1.2110(c)(3). Designated entities are defined as small businesses, businesses owned by members of minority groups and/or women, and rural telephone companies. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.2110(a). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.917. 47 C.F.R. � 1.65. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105(b)(2). 47 C.F.R. � 12105(a). See Section III.D. ``Upfront Payments - Due January 12, 2007,'' infra. 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105(b); see also Two Way Radio of Carolina, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12035 (1999). See Letter to Patrick Shannon, Counsel for Lynch 3G Communications Corp., from Margaret W. Wiener,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2248A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2248A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2248A1.txt
  • to default payments under 47 C.F.R. �� 1.2104(g) and 1.2109(c). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.2110(c)(3). Designated entities are defined as small businesses, businesses owned by members of minority groups and/or women, and rural telephone companies. 47 C.F.R. � 1.2110(a). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105(b); see also NCE Second Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 6700. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.917; see also 47 C.F.R. � 73.3513. After the filing window has closed, the auction system will not permit applicants to make certain changes, such as legal classification or NCE identification. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.65. For example, if ownership changes result in the attribution of new interest holders that affect the applicant's qualifications for a new entrant bidding credit, such
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-299A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-299A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-299A1.txt
  • long-form applications dismissed will be deemed to have defaulted and will be subject to default payments under 47 C.F.R. �� 1.2104(g) and 1.2109(c). 47 C.F.R. � 1.2110(c)(3). Designated entities are defined as small businesses, businesses owned by members of minority groups and/or women, and rural telephone companies. 47 C.F.R. � 1.2110(a). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.917. 47 C.F.R. � 1.65. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105(b)(2). 47 C.F.R. � 12105(a). See infra Section III.D ``Upfront Payments - Due April 17, 2006.'' 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105(b); see also Two Way Radio of Carolina, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12035 (1999). See Letter to Patrick Shannon, Counsel for Lynch 3G Communications Corp., from Margaret W. Wiener,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-874A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-874A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-874A1.txt
  • delinquency disclosure requirements for auction applicants). See Debt Collection Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 6540.See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.1112. Applicants that have their long-form applications dismissed will be deemed to have defaulted and will be subject to default payments under 47 C.F.R. �� 1.2104(g) and 1.2109(c). 47 C.F.R. � 1.2110(c)(2). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.917. 47 C.F.R. � 1.65. For example, if ownership changes result in the attribution of new interest holders that affect the applicant's qualifications for a new entrant bidding credit, such information must be clearly stated in the applicant's notification. See Liberty Productions, 16 FCC Rcd at 12078. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105(b)(2). See generally, 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105. See generally, 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-112A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-112A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-112A1.txt
  • license cancelled on February 8, 2005. CMHC contends that it did not file this cancellation request, and that it did not authorize anyone else to request the cancellation on its behalf. Accordingly, CMHC requests that the Commission reinstate the license for Station WPRK272 and initiate an investigation into the matter. For the reasons discussed herein, we deny the petition. Section 1.917(a) of the Commission's Rules specifies who may sign FCC applications. Applications and related statements of fact required by the Commission must be signed (either electronically or manually) (1) by the applicant, if the applicant is an individual; (2) by one of the partners if the applicant is a partnership; (3) by an officer, director, or duly authorized employee, if the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-30A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-30A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-30A1.txt
  • dismissed will be deemed to have defaulted and will be subject to default payments under 47 C.F.R. �� 1.2104(g) and 1.2109(c). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.2110(c)(3). Designated entities are defined as small businesses, businesses owned by members of minority groups and/or women, and rural telephone companies. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.2110(a). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.917. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.65. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105(b)(2). See 47 C.F.R. � 12105(a). See Section III.D. ``Upfront Payments - Due April 20, 2007,'' below. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105(b); see also Two Way Radio of Carolina, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12035 (1999). A wire transfer is a transaction that you initiate through your bank.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3793A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3793A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3793A2.txt
  • applicant, or an affiliate of a controlling interest are in default on any payment for any Commission construction permit or license or are delinquent on any non-tax debt owed to any Federal agency as of the short-form application filing deadline, the applicant will not be eligible to participate in the auction. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105(a)(2)(x). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.917; see also 47 C.F.R. � 73.3513. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105(a)(2)(v). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105. An applicant must not submit application-specific material through the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS). 47 C.F.R. � 1.65. For example, if ownership changes result in the attribution of new interest holders that affect the applicant's qualifications for a new entrant bidding credit, such
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1944A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1944A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1944A1.txt
  • Public Notice, DA 08-1644 (rel. July 14, 2008). . See 47 C.F.R. � 73.622. 47 C.F.R. Ch. 1, Subpart I. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1305-1.1319. See 47 C.F.R. Part 1, Appendix C. See infra Section IV.A.1. ``Simultaneous Multiple Round Auction.'' See 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105(b); see also NCE Second Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 6700. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.917; see also 47 C.F.R. � 73.3513. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.65. For example, if ownership changes result in the attribution of new interest holders that affect the applicant's qualifications for a new entrant bidding credit, such information must be clearly stated in the bidder's amendment. See Liberty Productions, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 16 FCC Rcd 12061, 12078 (2001). Events occurring
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1307A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1307A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1307A1.txt
  • for the Wireless Radio Services, including requirements concerning specific forms, electronic filing, application content, ownership information, waivers, and public notice. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 154, 161, 303 and 332. Section Number and Title: 1.901 Basis and purpose. 1.902 Scope. 1.903 Authorization required. 1.907 Definitions. 1.911 Station files. 1.913 Application and notification forms; electronic and manual filing. 1.915 General application requirements. 1.917 Who may sign applications. 1.919 Ownership information. 1.923 Content of applications. 1.924 Quiet zones. 1.925 Waivers. 1.926 Application processing; initial procedures. 1.927 Amendment of applications. 1.929 Classification of filings as major or minor. 1.931 Application for special temporary authority. 1.933 Public notices. 1.934 Defective applications and dismissal. 1.935 Agreements to dismiss applications, amendments or pleadings. 1.937 Repetitious or conflicting applications.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-810A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-810A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-810A2.txt
  • rural telephone companies. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.2110(a). 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105(b); see also NCE Second Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 6700. We reiterate that, even if an applicant's short-form application is dismissed, the applicant would remain subject to the anti-collusion rule until the down-payment deadline, which will be established after the auction closes. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.917; see also 47 C.F.R. � 73.3513. The Bureaus advise applicants to print and retain a copy of this confirmation page. 47 C.F.R. � 1.65. For example, if ownership changes result in the attribution of new interest holders that affect the applicant's qualifications for a new entrant bidding credit, such information must be clearly stated in the bidder's amendment. See Liberty
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-810A2_Rcd.pdf
  • and rural telephone companies. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.2110(a). 12147 C.F.R. � 1.2105(b); see also NCE Second Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 6700. 122We reiterate that, even if an applicant's short-form application is dismissed, the applicant would remain subject to the anti-collusion rule until the down-payment deadline, which will be established after the auction closes. 123See47 C.F.R. � 1.917; see also47 C.F.R. � 73.3513. 4470 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-810 73.If an applicant wishes to make permissible minor changes to its short-form application, such changes should be made electronically to its short-formapplication using the FCC Auction System whenever possible. Applicants are reminded to click on the SUBMIT button in the FCC Auction System for the changes to be submitted
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2008A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2008A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2008A1.txt
  • 18 FCC Rcd at 6700. We reiterate that, even if an applicant's short-form application is dismissed, the applicant would remain subject to the communication prohibitions of 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105(c) until the down-payment deadline, which will be established after the auction closes. The Bureaus advise applicants to print and retain a copy of this confirmation page. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.917; see also 47 C.F.R. � 73.3513. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.65, 1.2105(b). For example, if ownership changes result in the attribution of new interest holders that affect the applicant's qualifications for a new entrant bidding credit, such information must be clearly stated in the bidder's amendment. See Liberty Productions, 16 FCC Rcd at 12078. Events occurring after the application filing deadline,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2008A1_Rcd.pdf
  • Rcd at 6700. 121 We reiterate that, even if an applicant's short-form application is dismissed, the applicant would remain subject to the communication prohibitions of 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105(c) until the down-payment deadline, which will be established after the auction closes. 122 The Bureaus advise applicants to print and retain a copy of this confirmation page. 123See 47 C.F.R. � 1.917; see also 47 C.F.R. � 73.3513. 14902 Federal Communications Commission DA 10-2008 amendment.124 Changes that cause a loss of or reduction in the percentage of bidding credit specified on the originally submitted application must be reported immediately.125 If an amendment reporting substantial changes is a "major amendment," as defined by section 1.2105, the major amendment will not be accepted and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2253A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2253A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2253A1.txt
  • Rcd at 6700 � 22. We reiterate that, even if an applicant's short-form application is dismissed, the applicant would remain subject to the communication prohibitions of 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105(c) until the down-payment deadline, which will be established after the auction closes. The Bureaus advise applicants to print and retain a copy of this confirmation page. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.917; see also 47 C.F.R. � 73.3513. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.65, 1.2105(b). See also Part 1 Procedural Amendments Order, 25 FCC Rcd at 523 � 8. See 47 C.F.R. � 73.5007 (a). See also Rural First Report and Order, 25 FCC Rcd at 1611-1614 �� 57-63. For example, if ownership changes result in the attribution of new interest holders that affect
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2253A1_Rcd.pdf
  • after these windows close, applicants must submit a letter, briefly summarizing the changes, by e-mail to auction91@fcc.gov. The e-mail summarizing the changes must include a subject or caption referring to Auction 91 and the name of the applicant. The Bureaus request that parties format any attachments to e-mail as Adobe� Acrobat� (pdf) or Microsoft� Word documents. 131See 47 C.F.R. � 1.917; see also 47 C.F.R. � 73.3513. 132 47 C.F.R. �� 1.65, 1.2105(b). See also Part 1 Procedural Amendments Order, 25 FCC Rcd at 523 � 8. 133See 47 C.F.R. � 73.5007 (a). See alsoRural First Report and Order, 25 FCC Rcd at 1611-1614 �� 57-63. For example, if ownership changes result in the attribution of new interest holders that affect
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-524A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-524A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-524A1.txt
  • Inc. at 3 (filed Feb. 25, 2010) (``Metro Comments''). See Revision of Procedures Governing Amendments to FM Table of Allotments and Changes of Community of License in the Radio Broadcast Services, Report and Order, 21 FCC Rcd 14212, 14218-19 (2006), recon. pending. The Bureaus advise applicants to print and retain a copy of this confirmation page. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.917; see also 47 C.F.R. � 73.3513. 47 C.F.R. � 1.65. For example, if ownership changes result in the attribution of new interest holders that affect the applicant's qualifications for a new entrant bidding credit, such information must be clearly stated in the bidder's amendment. See Liberty Productions, 16 FCC Rcd at 12078. Events occurring after the application filing deadline, such
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-106A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-106A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-106A1.txt
  • asserts that, because ASTCA and STI had not disclosed an agreement by the short-form deadline, any sharing of information between them would have violated the Commission's rules. We are not persuaded that the disclosures by ASTCA and STI were procedurally improper, as Blue Sky contends. Blue Sky argues that the Disclosure Letters failed to meet the procedural requirements of section 1.917 and section 1.2105(a)(2)(viii) of the Commission's rules because each of the Disclosure Letters was signed by the respective outside counsel of ASTCA or STI, rather than ``by an officer, director, or duly authorized employee of either company.'' At the outset, we note that section 1.917 applies to applications for Wireless Radio Services licenses. Short-form applications are governed by the competitive
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-106A1_Rcd.pdf
  • that, because ASTCA and STI had not disclosed an agreement by the short-form deadline, any sharing of information between them would have violated the Commission's rules.94 48. We are not persuaded that the disclosures by ASTCA and STI were procedurally improper, as Blue Sky contends. Blue Sky argues that the Disclosure Letters failed to meet the procedural requirements of section 1.917 and section 1.2105(a)(2)(viii) of theCommission's rules because each of the Disclosure Letters was signed by the respective outside counsel of ASTCA or STI, rather than "by an officer, director, or duly authorized employee of either company."95At the outset, we bid will not be responsible for any final withdrawal payment if there is a subsequent higher bid in the same or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1845A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1845A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1845A1.txt
  • status after application filing deadline). We reiterate that, even if an applicant's short-form application is dismissed, the applicant would remain subject to the communication prohibitions of 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105(c) until the down-payment deadline, which will be established after the auction closes. The Bureaus advise applicants to print and retain a copy of this confirmation page. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.917; see also 47 C.F.R. � 73.3513. We remind each applicant of its duty to continuously maintain the accuracy of information submitted in its auction application. See, e.g., Vermont Telephone Company, Inc., DA 11-1536, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (EB rel. Oct. 14, 2011) (finding Vermont Telephone Company was apparently liable for forfeiture in the amount of $34,000 for failing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1845A1_Rcd.pdf
  • entity status after application filing deadline). 125We reiterate that, even if an applicant's short-form application is dismissed, the applicant would remain subject to the communication prohibitions of 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105(c) until the down-payment deadline, which will be established after the auction closes. 126The Bureaus advise applicants to print and retain a copy of this confirmation page. 127See47 C.F.R. � 1.917; see also47 C.F.R. � 73.3513. 128We remind each applicant of its duty to continuously maintain the accuracy ofinformation submitted in its auction application. See, e.g., Vermont Telephone Company, Inc., DA 11-1536, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture(EB rel. Oct. 14, 2011) (finding Vermont Telephone Company was apparently liable for forfeiture in the (continued....) 15507 Federal Communications Commission DA 11-1845 becomes
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-205A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-205A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-205A1.txt
  • the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, that you provide copies of any evidence documenting the date that J.W. Lail no longer owned AA or otherwise ceased to be authorized to act on behalf of the company. Your response, received October 25, 2010, consisted of tax records that did not address the ownership or management structure of the company. Section 1.917(a) of the Commission's Rules specifies who may sign FCC applications. Applications must be signed (1) by the applicant, if the applicant is an individual; (2) by one of the partners if the applicant is a partnership; (3) by an officer, director, or duly authorized employee, if the applicant is a corporation; (4) by a member who is an officer, if
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-205A1_Rcd.pdf
  • of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended,3that you provide copies of any evidence documenting the date that J.W. Lail no longer owned AA or otherwise ceased to be authorized to act on behalf of the company. Your response, received October 25, 2010, consisted of tax records that did not address the ownership or management structure of the company. Section 1.917(a) of the Commission's Rules specifies who may sign FCC applications.4 Applications must be signed (1) by the applicant, if the applicant is an individual; (2) by one of the partners if the applicant is a partnership; (3) by an officer, director, or duly authorized employee, if the applicant is a corporation; (4) by a member who is an officer, if
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-420A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-420A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-420A1.txt
  • 1.2110(a). 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105(b). We reiterate that, even if an applicant's short-form application is dismissed, the applicant would remain subject to the communication prohibitions of 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105(c) until the down-payment deadline, which will be established after the auction closes. The Bureau advises applicants to print and retain a copy of this confirmation page. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.917. See Section I.B.2.f. ``Duty to Report Prohibited Communications: Reporting Procedure,'' above. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.65, 1.2105(b). See also Part 1 Procedural Amendments Order, 25 FCC Rcd at 523 � 8. 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105(b)(2). . Contact information for subject matter experts may be found in Section VI. of this Public Notice, below. 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105(a). See Section III.D. ``Upfront
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-420A1_Rcd.pdf
  • 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105(b). 118 We reiterate that, even if an applicant's short-form application is dismissed, the applicant would remain subject to the communication prohibitions of 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105(c) until the down-payment deadline, which will be established after the auction closes. 119 The Bureau advises applicants to print and retain a copy of this confirmation page. 120See47 C.F.R. � 1.917. 3364 Federal Communications Commission DA 11-420 22 91. Applicants must not submit application-specific material through the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System ("ECFS"), which was used for submitting comments regarding Auction 92. Further, as discussed above, parties submitting information related to their applications should use caution to ensure that their submissions do not contain confidential information or communicate information that would
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-537A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-537A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-537A1.txt
  • Form 602 Ownership Report, coupled with the information on its FCC Form 603 Transfer of Control Applications, is sufficient for the Commission to make the requisite public interest determination. See FCC File No. 0003470445 (filed June 12, 2008) (FCC Form 602 with attached Ownership Exhibit detailing MariTEL's ownership after the proposed transfer of control is consummated). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.917(a) (applications may be signed ``by an officer, director, or duly authorized employee, if the applicant is a corporation''). See, e.g., Opposition to PFR at 12-13. See FCC File Nos. 0004899076, 0004899125, 0004899129 (all filed Oct. 4, 2011); 0004903064, 0004903144, 0004903166, 0004903170 (all filed Oct. 6, 2011). With one exception, the Commission has accepted those notifications as demonstrating that MariTEL has
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-537A1_Rcd.pdf
  • FCC Form 602 Ownership Report, coupled with the information on its FCC Form 603 Transfer of Control Applications, is sufficient for the Commission to make the requisite public interest determination. SeeFCC File No. 0003470445 (filed June 12, 2008) (FCC Form 602 with attached Ownership Exhibit detailing MariTEL's ownership after the proposed transfer of control is consummated). 46See 47 C.F.R. � 1.917(a) (applications may be signed "by an officer, director, or duly authorized employee, if the applicant is a corporation"). 47See, e.g., Opposition to PFR at 12-13. 48SeeFCC File Nos. 0004899076, 0004899125, 0004899129 (all filed Oct. 4, 2011); 0004903064, 0004903144, 0004903166, 0004903170 (all filed Oct. 6, 2011). With one exception, the Commission has accepted those notifications as demonstrating that MariTEL has met
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-641A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-641A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-641A1.txt
  • C.F.R. � 54.8. 47 C.F.R. � 1.21001(d). We reiterate that, even if an applicant's short-form application is dismissed, the applicant would remain subject to the communication prohibitions of 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105(c) until the long form application deadline after the auction closes. The Bureaus advise applicants to print and retain a copy of this confirmation page. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.917. See Section I.D.2.f. ``Duty to Report Prohibited Communications,'' above. 47 C.F.R. � 1.65. 47 C.F.R. � 1.21001(d)(4). . Contact information for subject matter experts may be found in Section VI. of this Public Notice, below. See Section II.J. ``Minor Modifications to Short-Form Applications,'' above. 47 C.F.R. � 1.21001(d)(4); see also Two Way Radio of North Carolina, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-114A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-114A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-114A1.txt
  • (1988) (MCI). Swan Creek Communications v. FCC, 39 F.3d 1217, 1222 (D.C. Cir. 1994). See MCI, 3 FCC Rcd at 512 � 35. In its Reinstatement Application, SLTHS describes itself as ``a local hospital providing emergency response to the general public.'' See Application File No. D122643, FCC Form 600, Item D12 See 47 C.F.R. � 90.35(a). See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.917(a), 90.33. Section 310(d) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1.948 of the Commission's Rules, provide that no license shall be transferred or assigned, or disposed of by transfer of control of any corporation holding such license, to any person except upon application to the Commission, and upon a finding by the Commission that the public interest,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-14A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-14A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-14A1.txt
  • Therefore, we reiterate that in accordance with the Commission's Rules, applicants must sign their applications themselves. conclusion For the reasons set forth above, we grant the Application for Review. We believe that this result squares with past Commission precedent, although we proscriptively overrule that precedent. Effective with the release of this Memorandum Opinion and Order, applicants must comply with Section 1.917 of our Rules or the applications are subject to dismissal. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 5(c)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 155(c)(5), and Section 1.115(g) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.115(g), the Application for Review filed by Hardrock Concrete Placement Company on February 4,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-210A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-210A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-210A1.txt
  • applicant. The Branch sent a courtesy notice of the ``database removal'' to Transit Mix's counsel. Transit Mix filed its AFR on November 7, 2000, and its Petition for Reconsideration on January 2, 2001. III. Discussion In its AFR, Transit Mix submits three reasons to support reinstatement of the assignment application, and reinstatement/renewal of Lafarge's license for Station WNQJ776. First, Section 1.917 does not prohibit the filing of a reinstatement application by an assignee. Second, our Form 600 instructions do not preclude a proposed assignee from serving as the applicant on a Form 600 seeking reinstatement of a license that had been expired for less than thirty days. Finally, Transit Mix argues that under our Late-filed Renewal Policy, the Branch erred in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-113A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-113A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-113A1.txt
  • an agent for a licensee with respect to such ministerial actions, so long as the lessee is in fact acting as the licensee's agent. The licensee would remain responsible for the substance and form of the filings, which would require, at a minimum, the licensee to review and approve of them before they are filed. The signature requirements of section 1.917, 47 C.F.R. � 1.917, remain in effect. For example, we will require all lease agreements to contain certain types of provisions designed to preserve the fundamental regulatory status quo in the event of a licensee's or spectrum lessee's bankruptcy. See paragraphs 188-89, infra. See NPRM at � 71; paragraph 61, supra. Congress left the task of defining ``control'' to the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-113A1_Erratum.doc
  • an agent for a licensee with respect to such ministerial actions, so long as the lessee is in fact acting as the licensee's agent. The licensee would remain responsible for the substance and form of the filings, which would require, at a minimum, the licensee to review and approve of them before they are filed. The signature requirements of section 1.917, 47 C.F.R. � 1.917, remain in effect. For example, we will require all lease agreements to contain certain types of provisions designed to preserve the fundamental regulatory status quo in the event of a licensee's or spectrum lessee's bankruptcy. See paragraphs 188-89, infra. See NPRM at � 71; paragraph 61, supra. Congress left the task of defining ``control'' to the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-210A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-210A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-210A1.txt
  • Ron Brasher tells me that these people, whoever they are, are eligible to hold a license, then I'm going to submit the application . . . . `` Tr. 1707. The Commission's rules require that if an applicant is an individual, the application must bear the original, handwritten signature of the applicant. 47 C.F.R. � 1.913(a), (e) (1996) (current � 1.917(a),(d)). See also Garcia v. Caremark, Inc., 921 S.W.2d 417, 420-21 (Tex. App. 1996) (``De facto'' administrator did not ``qualify'' as personal representative under the terms of the Probate Code). In responding to EB's request for admissions, Ronald admitted that neither O.C. nor his estate paid for the construction or operating costs of the station. He further stated that: ``The estate
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-172A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-172A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-172A1.txt
  • (ULS). See 47 U.S.C. � 154(i) (the Commission may make regulations, not inconsistent with the Act, as necessary in the execution of its functions). The information submitted need not be signed under oath; however, willful false statements made therein are punishable by fine and imprisonment, and by appropriate administrative sanctions, including revocation of a station's license. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.917(c). We find that there is good cause to make the requirement for BRS licensees to file information effective upon publication of the Order in the Federal Register. The Commission has provided BRS licensees with ample time to file the required information and the ability to use the ULS to submit the information easily. As noted above, reliable data on each
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-47A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-47A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-47A1.txt
  • long-form applications dismissed will be deemed to have defaulted and will be subject to default payments under 47 C.F.R. �� 1.2104(g) and 1.2109(c). 47 C.F.R. � 1.2110(c)(3). Designated entities are defined as small businesses, businesses owned by members of minority groups and/or women, and rural telephone companies. 47 C.F.R. � 1.2110(a). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.917. 47 C.F.R. � 1.65. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105(b)(2). CSEA/Part 1 Designated Entity FNPRM. Id., � 1. Id., � 21. Id., � 21, n.54. 47 C.F.R. � 12105(a). See Section III.D. ``Upfront Payments - Due June 1, 2006,'' infra. 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105(b); see also Two Way Radio of Carolina, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 12035 (1999).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-132A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-132A1.pdf
  • ``Licensees must file maps and other supporting documents showing compliance with the respective construction requirements within the appropriate five- and ten-year benchmarks of the date of their initial licenses.'' 47 C.F.R. � 24.203(c). See, e.g., Cellular South 700 MHz Further Notice Comments at 5. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. � 1.17 (Truthful and accurate statements to the Commission); 47 C.F.R. � 1.917 (``Willful false statements made therein, however, are punishable by fine and imprisonment, 18 U.S.C. 1001, and by appropriate administrative sanctions, including revocation of station license pursuant to 312(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.''). We decline to adopt the suggestion from RTG that we define a bright line test for what constitutes sufficient signal strength, because we will
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-132A1_Erratum.doc
  • ``Licensees must file maps and other supporting documents showing compliance with the respective construction requirements within the appropriate five- and ten-year benchmarks of the date of their initial licenses.'' 47 C.F.R. � 24.203(c). See, e.g., Cellular South 700 MHz Further Notice Comments at 5. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. � 1.17 (Truthful and accurate statements to the Commission); 47 C.F.R. � 1.917 (``Willful false statements made therein, however, are punishable by fine and imprisonment, 18 U.S.C. 1001, and by appropriate administrative sanctions, including revocation of station license pursuant to 312(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.''). We decline to adopt the suggestion from RTG that we define a bright line test for what constitutes sufficient signal strength, because we will
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-230A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-230A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-230A1.txt
  • is consistent with the performance benchmarks and requirements that we propose above. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. � 1.946. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.946(d) (``The notification must be filed with Commission within 15 days of the expiration of the applicable construction or coverage period.''). See, e.g., 47 C.F. R. � 1.17 (Truthful and accurate statements to the Commission); 47 C.F.R. � 1.917 (``Willful false statements made therein, however, are punishable by fine and imprisonment, 18 U.S.C. 1001, and by appropriate administrative sanctions, including revocation of station license pursuant to 312(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.''). See, e.g., AASHTO Comments at 11; APCO Comments at 30; Council Tree Comments at 19; Ericsson Comments at 26; NENA Comments at 2; PSST
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-46A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-46A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-46A1.txt
  • Anti-Collusion Rule, WT Docket No. 07-166, Second Report and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 15289, 15348-55 ��153-175 (2007) (subsequent history omitted). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.946(d) (``notification[s] must be filed with Commission within 15 days of the expiration of the applicable construction or coverage period''). See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. � 1.17 (Truthful and accurate statements to the Commission); 47 C.F.R. � 1.917(c) (``[w]illful false statements . . . are punishable by fine and imprisonment, 18 U.S.C. 1001, and by appropriate administrative sanctions, including revocation of station license pursuant to 312(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended''). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200 et seq. See id. � 1.1206(b)(2). Id. � 1.1206(b). 5 U.S.C. � 603. See 5 U.S.C. � 603. The RFA,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-46A1_Rcd.pdf
  • name, U.S. Postal Service mailing address, and the applicable docket number. Parties may also submit an electronic comment by Internet e-mail. 5See47 C.F.R. � 1.946(d) ("notification[s] must be filed with Commission within 15 days of the expiration of the applicable construction or coverage period"). 6See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. � 1.17 (Truthful and accurate statements to the Commission); 47 C.F.R. � 1.917(c) ("[w]illful false statements . . . are punishable by fine and imprisonment, 18 U.S.C. 1001, and by appropriate administrative sanctions, including revocation of station license pursuant to 312(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended"). 3451 Paper Filers: Parties who choose to file by paper must file an original and four copies of each filing. Filings can be sent
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-82A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-82A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-82A1.txt
  • Corporation; Application for Transfer of Control, WC Docket No. 06-74, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 5662, 5816 (2007). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.946(d) (``notification[s] must be filed with Commission within 15 days of the expiration of the applicable construction or coverage period''). See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. � 1.17 (Truthful and accurate statements to the Commission); 47 C.F.R. � 1.917(c) (``[w]illful false statements . . . are punishable by fine and imprisonment, 18 U.S.C. 1001, and by appropriate administrative sanctions, including revocation of station license pursuant to 312(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended''). After a review of the record, we are persuaded that it is unnecessary to formally put the construction notifications out for public comment as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-82A1_Rcd.pdf
  • BellSouth Corporation; Application for Transfer of Control, WC Docket No. 06-74, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 5662, 5816 (2007). 527See47 C.F.R. � 1.946(d) ("notification[s] must be filed with Commission within 15 days of the expiration of the applicable construction or coverage period"). 528See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. � 1.17 (Truthful and accurate statements to the Commission); 47 C.F.R. � 1.917(c) ("[w]illful false statements . . . are punishable by fine and imprisonment, 18 U.S.C. 1001, and by appropriate administrative sanctions, including revocation of station license pursuant to 312(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended"). 529After a review of the record, we are persuaded that it is unnecessary to formally put the construction notifications out for public comment as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-32A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-32A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-32A1.txt
  • would need to evaluate the carrying value of these assets.''). ). ). See, e.g., 27 C.F.R. �� 27.14(a), (j), (o). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.946(d) (``notification[s] must be filed with Commission within 15 days of the expiration of the applicable construction or coverage period''). See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. � 1.17 (Truthful and accurate statements to the Commission); 47 C.F.R. � 1.917(c) (``Willful false statements . . . are punishable by fine and imprisonment, 18 U.S.C. 1001, and by appropriate administrative sanctions, including revocation of station license pursuant to 312(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.''). 47 C.F.R. � 2.106. Part 27 licensees must also comply with other Commission rules of general applicability. See 47 C.F.R. � 27.3. These service
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.wp
  • accessed by using software available for downloading from the Commission's web site at http://www.fcc.gov/wtb/uls. The initial set of clearances would include whether the manually filed application has been signed and whether 81 all applications included the appropriate filing fee. See proposed rule 47 C.F.R. � 1.934(d). Electronically filed applications may contain an electronic signature. See proposed rule 47 C.F.R. � 1.917(d). 21 52. There will be two means for parties to electronically file applications with the Commission: batch and interactive. Batch filers will follow a set Commission format for entering data. Batch filers will 78 79 then send via file transfer protocol (FTP) batches of data to the Commission for compiling. ULS will compile such filings overnight and respond the next
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/FCC-04-210A1.html
  • Ron Brasher tells me that these people, whoever they are, are eligible to hold a license, then I'm going to submit the application . . . . " Tr. 1707. The Commission's rules require that if an applicant is an individual, the application must bear the original, handwritten signature of the applicant. 47 C.F.R. S 1.913(a), (e) (1996) (current S 1.917(a),(d)). See also Garcia v. Caremark, Inc., 921 S.W.2d 417, 420-21 (Tex. App. 1996) ("De facto" administrator did not "qualify" as personal representative under the terms of the Probate Code). In responding to EB's request for admissions, Ronald admitted that neither O.C. nor his estate paid for the construction or operating costs of the station. He further stated that: "The estate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/4361-96.pdf
  • Island $0 $0 $0 0 Johnston Atoll $0 $0 $0 0 Kingman Reef $0 $0 $0 0 Midway Atoll $0 $0 $0 0 Northern Mariana Islands $26,104 6.391.9 1.7 0.1 0.0 $9,311 0.0100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $14,303 0.0100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 13,280 3.294.5 2.2 0.1 0.0 Palmyra Atoll $0 $0 $0 0 Wake Island $0 $0 $0 0 Oceania $2,526,31750.030.7 1.917.5 0.0 $322,34237.646.4 0.016.0 0.0 $371,71145.515.7 0.038.9 0.0 1,201,95344.140.0 2.313.6 0.0 Albania $12,77999.2 0.2 0.0 0.7 0.0 $0 $0 4,02398.3 1.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 Armenia $23,15149.034.7 0.016.3 0.0 $0 $0 14,28424.841.1 0.034.1 0.0 Azerbaijan $46,00294.6 2.6 0.2 2.7 0.0 $0 $0 16,45185.1 4.4 0.310.2 0.0 Belarus $30,57660.134.5 1.0 4.4 0.0 $0 $6100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 17,07334.445.5 8.911.2 0.0 Bosnia and
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/4361-f99.pdf
  • 0.0 14,504,422,76946.233.214.1 0.9 5.5 Argentina $134,003,81458.717.317.1 2.1 4.9 $18,259,48456.723.219.6 0.0 0.5 $748,91472.023.3 4.7 0.0 0.0 251,998,83641.719.726.0 3.7 8.9 Bolivia $33,817,69453.229.810.8 1.0 5.2 $2,972,82344.446.5 7.8 0.0 1.3 $354,84592.8 6.4 0.7 0.0 0.0 50,442,10539.234.014.9 2.2 9.7 Brazil $336,051,15050.633.410.2 2.5 3.3 $43,344,00149.932.417.7 0.0 0.1 $1,544,66385.710.9 3.3 0.0 0.0 772,279,82738.437.016.3 2.6 5.7 Chile $57,293,49745.433.013.6 0.6 7.5 $19,561,42446.335.016.7 0.0 2.0 $7,114,82181.9 5.412.7 0.0 0.0 154,864,09039.426.715.0 1.917.0 Colombia $208,600,74051.034.6 9.1 1.1 4.2 $24,342,94454.229.515.6 0.0 0.7 $794,49294.2 0.6 5.2 0.0 0.0 378,036,69639.531.414.1 4.210.7 Ecuador $107,297,74237.333.717.7 4.2 7.2 $5,174,76331.443.116.1 0.0 9.4 $1,401,03462.926.410.7 0.0 0.0 212,249,66326.329.623.7 9.411.1 French Guiana $911,86378.712.6 0.0 3.0 5.7 $181,776100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $95,145100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,721,83174.1 8.3 0.0 7.610.0 - Switched Services Market Shares Page 3 - 1999 Annual data SECTION 43.61
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/99socc.pdf
  • FirstWorld Communications, Inc. 22,400 134,400 24,300 0.000 Five Area Long Distance, Inc. 2,954 31,024 13,002 0.000 Flat Rock Communications, Inc. 236 3,861 9,932 0.000 Focal Communications Corporation 5,568 4,158,608 9,414 0.000 Fort Bend Long Distance Company, Inc. 30,768 243,179 157,249 0.003 FoxTel, Inc. 52,971 1,059,421 331,069 0.007 Frontier Corporation Allnet Comm. Svcs., Inc. d/b/a Frontier Comm. Svcs. 28,117,587 113,595,055 93,459,775 1.917 Budget Call Long Distance, Inc. 64,613 618,847 330,995 0.007 Frontier Long Distance of America, Inc. 199,301 577,224 440,198 0.009 FTC Management Group, Inc. Farmer's Long Distance, Inc. 57,497 459,745 223,331 0.005 GE Capital Corporation GE Capital Communication Services Corporation 1,032,145 5,055,311 6,319,139 0.130 Germantown Long Distance 594 2,649 822 0.000 Glasford Telephone Company 465 3,539 7,189 0.000 Global Telephone Corporation
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.wp
  • accessed by using software available for downloading from the Commission's web site at http://www.fcc.gov/wtb/uls. The initial set of clearances would include whether the manually filed application has been signed and whether 81 all applications included the appropriate filing fee. See proposed rule 47 C.F.R. � 1.934(d). Electronically filed applications may contain an electronic signature. See proposed rule 47 C.F.R. � 1.917(d). 21 52. There will be two means for parties to electronically file applications with the Commission: batch and interactive. Batch filers will follow a set Commission format for entering data. Batch filers will 78 79 then send via file transfer protocol (FTP) batches of data to the Commission for compiling. ULS will compile such filings overnight and respond the next
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/da992812.doc
  • a mistake rather than an intentional misrepresentation. We are satisfied that CJW inadvertently checked the wrong box on the application form when it identified itself as a corporation rather than a partnership. Thus, we do not believe that CJW's action constitutes a violation of the prohibition against misrepresentations in Commission filings. We are also satisfied that CJW complied with Section 1.917, regarding who can sign applications, because the record before us reflects that Dennis Cipcich is one of three owners of CJW. Therefore, this argument forms no basis for revoking the license for Station WPLF973. Next, KR&G asserts that CJW made misrepresentations regarding its eligibility for licensing on the channel by stating that it was engaged in business as a transportation
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da002565.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da002565.txt
  • the following address: FCC, Attention: Trunking License Correction, 1270 Fairfield Road, Gettysburg, PA 17325-7245. Licensees may request the conversion of multiple licenses in a single request. The letter request must include the licensee's name, contact phone number, the call sign(s) of all licenses to be converted (listed alphabetically), and the signature of the applicant as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.917. In order to maintain the necessary distinction between licenses previously granted with a trunked radio service code and those licenses being modified under the above procedure, the Commission will, prior to acting on the letter requests, update its database to reflect a FB8 station class code on all licenses that currently specify a trunked radio service code. This update will
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/FCC-04-210A1.html
  • Ron Brasher tells me that these people, whoever they are, are eligible to hold a license, then I'm going to submit the application . . . . " Tr. 1707. The Commission's rules require that if an applicant is an individual, the application must bear the original, handwritten signature of the applicant. 47 C.F.R. S 1.913(a), (e) (1996) (current S 1.917(a),(d)). See also Garcia v. Caremark, Inc., 921 S.W.2d 417, 420-21 (Tex. App. 1996) ("De facto" administrator did not "qualify" as personal representative under the terms of the Probate Code). In responding to EB's request for admissions, Ronald admitted that neither O.C. nor his estate paid for the construction or operating costs of the station. He further stated that: "The estate
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1845A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1845A1.pdf
  • status after application filing deadline). We reiterate that, even if an applicant's short-form application is dismissed, the applicant would remain subject to the communication prohibitions of 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105(c) until the down-payment deadline, which will be established after the auction closes. The Bureaus advise applicants to print and retain a copy of this confirmation page. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.917; see also 47 C.F.R. � 73.3513. We remind each applicant of its duty to continuously maintain the accuracy of information submitted in its auction application. See, e.g., Vermont Telephone Company, Inc., DA 11-1536, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (EB rel. Oct. 14, 2011) (finding Vermont Telephone Company was apparently liable for forfeiture in the amount of $34,000 for failing