FCC Web Documents citing 1.92

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-377A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-377A1.pdf
  • to be heard, David L. Titus, in person or by his attorney, SHALL FILE with the Commission, within 30 calendar days of the release of this Order to Show Cause, a written appearance stating that he will appear on the date fixed for hearing and present evidence on the issues specified herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 1.92(c) of the Commission's rules, if David L. Titus fails to timely file a written appearance within the 30-day period, or has not filed a petition to accept, for good cause shown, a written appearance beyond the expiration of the 30-day period, his right to a hearing shall be deemed by the Presiding Administrative Law Judge to be waived, and the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4675A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4675A1.pdf
  • in this proceeding, Lonnie L. Keeney, in person or by his attorney, SHALL FILE with the Commission, within thirty (30) days of the release of this Order to Show Cause, a written appearance stating that he will appear on the date fixed for hearing and present evidence on the issues specified herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 1.92(c) of the Commission's rules, if Lonnie L. Keeney fails to timely file a written appearance within the thirty (30)-day period, or has not filed a petition to accept, for good cause shown, a written appearance beyond the expiration of the thirty (30)-day period, the right to a hearing shall be deemed to be waived. Where a hearing is waived, the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4676A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4676A1.pdf
  • of appearance to state that Mr. Landis would appear on the hearing date and present evidence on the specified issues. In addition, the OSC informed Mr. Landis that, if he failed to so file a written notice of appearance, his right to a hearing would be deemed waived, and the hearing proceeding would be resolved thereafter in accordance with Section 1.92(c) of the Commission's rules. The Presiding Judge determined that Mr. Landis had received a copy of the OSC but had failed to file a written notice of appearance seeking to avail himself of the right to a hearing. Mr. Landis sent separate letters to the Chief of the Enforcement Bureau and the Presiding Judge, stating that he could not appear
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1370A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1370A1.pdf
  • for Station KBKH(FM), Shamrock, Texas ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) EB Docket No. 06-163 File No. EB-03-IH-0130 File No. BRH-20050401AAA Facility ID No. 81640 Memorandum opinion and ORDER Adopted: June 22, 2009 Released: June 22, 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION By this Memorandum Opinion and Order, we dismiss the above-captioned proceeding pursuant to Section 1.92(d) of the Commission's rules. Based upon the evidence of his felony conviction, we conclude that Terry Keith Hammond lacks the basic requisite character qualifications to be and remain a Commission licensee, and note that such conclusion would have warranted revocation of the license for Station KBKH(FM) (the ``Station'') prior to its cancellation. Our actions herein are taken pursuant to authority
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-916A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-916A1.pdf
  • file with the Commission within 30 days of release thereof, a written appearance stating his intention to appear on the date fixed for hearing and present evidence on the specified issues. The Order to Show Cause informed Mr. Keeney that if he failed to file a timely written appearance, his right to a hearing would be waived pursuant to Section 1.92(c) of the Commission's rules, and the Presiding Administrative Law Judge would thereafter issue an order terminating the hearing and certifying the case to the Commission for resolution. The ALJ issued Lonnie L. Keeney, Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 08M-13 (ALJ, rel. January 25, 2008) (``MO&O''), holding that Mr. Keeney had failed to file a written appearance and that his representations
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-246A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-246A1.pdf
  • this proceeding, Shenzhen, in person or by an attorney, SHALL FILE with the Commission, within thirty (30) days of the release of this Order to Show Cause, a written appearance stating that it will appear at the hearing and present evidence on the issues specified above. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 312(c) of the Act and sections 1.92(c) and 2.939(b) of the Rules, if Shenzhen fails to file a timely notice of appearance within the thirty (30) day period, or has not filed a petition to accept, for good cause shown, a written appearance beyond the expiration of the thirty (30)-day period, its right to a hearing SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE WAIVED. In the event that Shenzhen
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-125A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-125A1.pdf
  • 503(b)(6). See Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section 1.80 of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 17087, 17100-01, � 27, 17112 Appendix A (1997), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999); see also 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b). 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(3). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.91, � 1.221. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.92(a). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.92(c). (Continued from previous page.) (Continued...) Federal Communications Commission FCC 07-125 Federal Communications Commission FCC 07-125 � & ' ( - < c e y � � � � � � � h h| h| h h| h h h h h 8 h h� h� c c h� h� h� h� h� h�^ � �
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-165A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-165A1.pdf
  • APPEARANCE stating that they will, individually and/or by legal representative, appear on the date fixed for hearing and present evidence on the issues specified herein. 26. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Chief, Enforcement Bureau, SHALL BE MADE a party to this proceeding without the need to file a notice of appearance. 27. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.92(c) of the Commission's rules, that if Buzz Telecom Corporation, Business Options, Inc., US Bell Corporation, Link Technologies, AVATAR, and/or their principals Kurtis J. Kintzel and/or Keanan Kintzel fail to timely file written appearances within the 20-day period referenced above, or have not filed a petition to accept, for good cause shown, a written appearance beyond the expiration of the 20-day
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1826A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1826A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1826A1.txt
  • system (22,000 km of submarine cable and 3,000 km of terrestrial links across Argentina, Chile and Guatemala) in a self-healing ring architecture comprised of four fiber pairs ultimately capable of carrying 48 channels at 10 Gbps each. Initial capacity on the SAm-1 system will be 40 Gbps. Multiple upgrades will be possible using dense wave division multiplexing (DWDM) up to 1.92 Tbps. Applicants anticipate having the system in service by November 30, 2000. SAm-1's undersea cable segments and their capacity are summarized in Exhibit B attached to this Order. Comments We placed the Application on public notice on February 18, 2000. Tyco Submarine Systems Ltd. (Tyco Submarine) filed comments in support of the application on March 17, 2000. Pursuant to Section
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1489A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1489A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1489A1.txt
  • a written notice of appearance in order to avail himself of the opportunity to be heard. The OSC explained that if Mr. Brewer failed to file a timely written notice of appearance, his right to a hearing on the matter of his captioned station licenses would be deemed waived, and the proceeding thereafter would be conducted in accordance with Section 1.92 of the Commission's rules. By Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 01M-11, released May 4, 2001, the Presiding Judge determined that Mr. Brewer had received a copy of the OSC, but failed to file a written (or any other) notice of appearance seeking to avail himself of the opportunity to be heard. Accordingly, the Presiding Judge concluded that the hearing was
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2152A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2152A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2152A1.txt
  • Two-Way Radio, Inc. K. Lawson Pedigo, Esq. Ronnie Wilson, Esq. Fulbright & Jaworski, L.L.P. 100 North Central Expressway, Suite 1211 2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 2800 Richardson, Texas, 75080 Dallas, Texas, 75201 Counsel for David and Diane Brasher David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau Letter from Carolyn S. Lutz to the FCC dated September 29, 2000; Joint Statement Pursuant to Section 1.92 of the Rules filed by Jim Sumpter, Norma Sumpter, Melissa Sumpter and Jennifer Hill on October 6, 2000. We note that Melissa Sumpter recently married, but her license for station WPJS437 is in her maiden name. Federal Communications Commission DA 01-2152 � (c) M N � � M N � � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3513A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3513A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3513A1.txt
  • a written notice of appearance in order to avail itself of the opportunity to be heard. The OSC admonished RMI that, if it failed to so file a written notice of appearance, its right to a hearing on the matter of its captioned broadcast license would be deemed waived, and the proceeding thereafter would be resolved in accordance with Section 1.92 (c) of the Commission's rules. 5. The Presiding Judge determined that RMI had received a copy of the OSC but had failed to file a written (or any other) notice of appearance seeking to avail itself of the opportunity to be heard. Accordingly, the Presiding Judge concluded that RMI had waived its right to a hearing, and he terminated the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3738A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3738A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3738A1.txt
  • in this proceeding, Roger Thomas Scaggs, in person or by his attorney, SHALL FILE with the Commission, within thirty (30) days of the release of this Order to Show Cause, a written appearance stating that he will appear on the date fixed for hearing and present evidence on the issues specified herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 1.92(c) of the Commission's rules, if Roger Thomas Scaggs fails to timely file a written appearance within the thirty (30)-day period, or has not filed a petition to accept, for good cause shown, a written appearance beyond the expiration of the thirty (30)-day period, the right to a hearing shall be deemed to be waived. Where a hearing is waived, the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3738A1_Erratum.doc
  • in this proceeding, Roger Thomas Scaggs, in person or by his attorney, SHALL FILE with the Commission, within thirty (30) days of the release of this Order to Show Cause, a written appearance stating that he will appear on the date fixed for hearing and present evidence on the issues specified herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 1.92(c) of the Commission's rules, if Roger Thomas Scaggs fails to timely file a written appearance within the thirty (30)-day period, or has not filed a petition to accept, for good cause shown, a written appearance beyond the expiration of the thirty (30)-day period, the right to a hearing shall be deemed to be waived. Where a hearing is waived, the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1068A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1068A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1068A1.txt
  • would appear on the date fixed for the hearing and present evidence on the specified issues. The OSC informed Mr. Scaggs that, if he failed to so file a written notice of appearance, his right to a hearing on the matter of his amateur license would be deemed waived, and the proceeding would be resolved thereafter in accordance with section 1.92(c) of the Commission's rules. The Presiding Judge determined that Mr. Scaggs had received a copy of the OSC but had failed to file a written notice of appearance seeking to avail himself of the opportunity to be heard. Accordingly, the Presiding Judge concluded that Mr. Scaggs had waived his right to a hearing, and the Presiding Judge terminated the proceeding
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1704A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1704A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1704A1.txt
  • a copy of the OSC but had failed to file a written notice of appearance seeking to avail itself of the opportunity to be heard. Accordingly, the Presiding Judge concluded that J Communications had waived its right to a hearing, and he terminated the proceeding and certified the case to the Commission for disposition in accordance with 47 C.F.R. � 1.92(c). The Commission has delegated authority to the Enforcement Bureau for such revocation proceedings, terminated on the basis of waiver, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 0.111(a)(17). III. DISCUSSION A. Facts The GMRS is a short-distance, two-way land mobile radio service available for communications that facilitate personal or business activities of licensees and their immediate family members. Section 95.631(a) of the rules
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1014A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1014A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1014A1.txt
  • Shih had received a copy of the OSC but had failed to file a written notice of appearance seeking to avail itself of the opportunity to be heard. Accordingly, he concluded that Tung Shih had waived its right to a hearing, and terminated the proceeding and certified the case to the Commission for disposition in accordance with 47 C.F.R. � 1.92(c). The Commission has delegated authority to the Enforcement Bureau for such revocation proceedings, terminated on the basis of waiver, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 0.111(a)(17). III. DISCUSSION A. Facts Learned mode transmitters are typically sold as universal replacements or duplicates for garage door openers, keyless entry systems, security alarms, remote switches and similar types of radio controlled devices. These transmitters
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1889A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1889A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1889A1.txt
  • Facility ID No. 92810 Facility ID No. 94199 File No. BPED-19990907MG MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: July 6, 2005 Released: July 7, 2005 By the Acting Chief, Enforcement Bureau: introduction By this Memorandum Opinion And Order, acting pursuant to authority delegated to the Enforcement Bureau under section 0.111(a)(17) of the Commission's rules, we dismiss the above-captioned proceeding pursuant to section 1.92(d) of the Commission's rules. We conclude, based on the evidence described herein that KEGG Communications, Inc. (``KCI'') surrendered the license for FM translator Station K216EQ, Daingerfield, Texas and that the Media Bureau canceled that authorization. We further note that the presiding Administrative Law Judge (``Presiding Judge'') dismissed with prejudice KCI's captioned application for a construction permit for a new noncommercial
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2015A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2015A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2015A1.txt
  • in this proceeding, David Edward Cox, in person or by his attorney, SHALL FILE with the Commission, within thirty (30) days of the release of this Order to Show Cause, a written appearance stating that he will appear on the date fixed for hearing and present evidence on the issues specified herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.92(c) of the Commission's rules, if David Edward Cox fails to timely file a written appearance within the thirty (30)-day period, or has not filed a petition to accept, for good cause shown, a written appearance beyond the expiration of the thirty (30)-day period, the right to a hearing shall be deemed to be waived. Where a hearing is waived, the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1570A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1570A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1570A1.txt
  • in this proceeding, Robert D. Landis, in person or by his attorney, SHALL FILE with the Commission, within thirty (30) days of the release of this Order to Show Cause, a written appearance stating that he will appear on the date fixed for hearing and present evidence on the issues specified herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.92(c) of the Commission's rules, if Robert D. Landis fails to timely file a written appearance within the thirty (30)-day period, or has not filed a petition to accept, for good cause shown, a written appearance beyond the expiration of the thirty (30)-day period, the right to a hearing shall be deemed to be waived. Where a hearing is waived, the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2463A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2463A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2463A1.txt
  • would appear on the date fixed for the hearing and present evidence on the specified issues. The OSC informed Mr. Cox that, if he failed to so file a written notice of appearance, his right to a hearing on the matter of his amateur license would be deemed waived, and the proceeding would be resolved thereafter in accordance with Section 1.92(c) of the Commission's rules. The Presiding Judge determined that Mr. Cox had received a copy of the OSC but had failed to file a written notice of appearance seeking to avail himself of the opportunity to be heard. Accordingly, the Presiding Judge concluded that Mr. Cox had waived his right to a hearing, and the Presiding Judge terminated the proceeding
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1564A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1564A2.txt
  • the bandlimited Gaussian noise signal. Table 7-5. D/U Ratio With DVB-H as Undesired Signal Relative to That with Bandlimited Gaussian Noise D/U Ratio Relative to Baseline (dB) Channel Offset A3 D3 I1 J1 M1 N1 O1 G4 Mean (dB) (Excluding G4) Standard Deviation (dB) (Excluding G4) N-6 -0.87 -0.08 0.24 0.17 -0.78 -0.23 -0.54 -1.47 -0.30 0.44 N-4 -0.94 -0.1 1.92 0.04 -0.74 -0.43 -0.54 -0.87 -0.11 0.96 N-3 -0.53 -0.53 0.09 -1.13-0.52-5.44-0.53 0.49 -1.23 1.89 N-2 -0.54 -0.15 0.2 -0.09-0.05 -0.08 0.00 -0.08 -0.10 0.22 N+2 0.12 -2.37 -0.57 0.26 0.43 0.11 0.24 -1.53 -0.25 0.99 Mean -0.55 -0.65 0.38 -0.15-0.33 -1.21 -0.27 -0.69 -0.40 (-0.25) Std Dev 0.42 0.98 0.92 0.56 0.52 2.37 0.37 0.88 1.09 (0.66) Note: The
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A4.txt
  • Special 27 SportingEvent 20 Sports 28 SportsAnthology 20 Sports 29 Sports-related 20 Sports 30 Syndicated 21 Syndicated 31 TalkShow 22 TalkShow 32 Teamvs.Team 20 Sports 33 TVMovie 23 TVMovie Source:TMSandauthordecisions.SeeAppendixAfordefinitionsofTMSProgramTypes. 32 Table4:DistributionofProgramTypesandCategoriesintheEstimationDataset ProgramTypeNumber ShareCategory Number Share ArtsSci 273 0.18ActionAdv 5,397 3.63 Business 786 0.53Adult 3,898 2.62 Cartoon 5,091 3.42Animated 6,498 4.37 Children 6,356 4.27Anthol 534 0.36 DaytimeSoap 961 0.65ArtsSci 2,857 1.92 GameShow 1,441 0.97Business 1,453 0.98 Health 2,370 1.59Children 920 0.62 Hobbies 10,237 6.88Comedy 4,764 3.20 Infomercial 6,042 4.06Community 1,231 0.83 Instructional 3,811 2.56Documentary 2,235 1.50 Miniseries 352 0.24Drama 13,622 9.16 Movie 11,078 7.45Educational 13,090 8.80 Music 2,999 2.02Entertainment 2,800 1.88 NetworkSeries 20,919 14.07Fantasy 952 0.64 News 1,610 1.08French 159 0.11 Other 8,333 5.60GameShow 501 0.34 Pelicula 941 0.63Health 2,181 1.47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • (1.27) 0.0076 (1.80) 0.0253 (0.32) -0.0212 (-0.98) 0.0000 (-0.55) 0.0401 276 Percent Entertainment/Leisure/DJ Banter, Evening 0.0471 (0.10) 0.0000 (0.00) -0.0724 (-0.55) -0.0030 (-0.08) 0.0000 (0.06) -0.0315 276 Percent Music, Evening -1.8120*(2.34) 0.0120 (1.02) -0.0628 (-0.28) -0.0138 (-0.23) -0.0001 (-1.51) 0.3553 276 Percent News, Evening 0.0460 (0.30) 0.0010 (0.45) 0.0406 (0.92) -0.0030 (-0.25) 0.0000 (-0.37) 0.1381 276 Percent Sports, Evening 1.1875 (1.92) -0.0139 (1.49) -0.1275 (-0.72) 0.0867 (1.80) 0.0001 (1.76) 0.1494 276 Average Block, Advertisements, AM Drive -0.3488 (0.11) 0.0394 (0.77) -0.9434 (-1.00) 0.1923 (0.74) -0.0003 (-1.63) 0.0093 250 Average Block, Entertainment/Leisure/DJ Banter, AM Drive -4.2684 (0.56) 0.0226 (0.19) 6.0971*(2.79) -0.3916 (-0.65) 0.0003 (0.60) 0.0232 250 Average Block, Music, AM Drive -0.4603 (0.10) -0.0554 (0.80) -0.7444 (-0.58) -0.3532 (-0.99) 0.0001 (0.50) 0.1028
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A7.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A7.txt
  • Notes: Absolute values of t-statistics in parentheses (using heteroscedastic-consistent standard errors corrected for clustering by television station); ***p<.01, **p<.05 and *p<.10. 41 Table 9: Total State and Local Candidate Coverage (in seconds) Independent variables (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Local station ownership Cross-owned newspaper 7.8 (0.87) 16.8 (1.50) 16.6 (1.48) 18.6 (1.62) 21.8* (1.87) Cross-owned radio station -37.6** (2.15) -34.3* (1.92) -15.4 (1.12) -7.2 (0.58) Cross-owned radio and newspaper 1.9 (0.07) 6.4 (0.25) -0.9 (0.04) -16.3 (0.80) Parent company coverage of all television households (%) 1.2 (1.47) 1.2* (1.90) 0.2 (0.31) Network owned and operated -5.7 (0.27) -25.4 (1.50) -9.3 (0.57) Network affiliation (omitted category is CW\MyNetwork) ABC 2.1 (0.13) 6.4 (0.32) CBS -9.5 (0.59) -0.5 (0.02) FOX 54.1*** (3.56) 40.0**
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-377A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-377A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-377A1.txt
  • to be heard, David L. Titus, in person or by his attorney, SHALL FILE with the Commission, within 30 calendar days of the release of this Order to Show Cause, a written appearance stating that he will appear on the date fixed for hearing and present evidence on the issues specified herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 1.92(c) of the Commission's rules, if David L. Titus fails to timely file a written appearance within the 30-day period, or has not filed a petition to accept, for good cause shown, a written appearance beyond the expiration of the 30-day period, his right to a hearing shall be deemed by the Presiding Administrative Law Judge to be waived, and the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4675A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4675A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4675A1.txt
  • in this proceeding, Lonnie L. Keeney, in person or by his attorney, SHALL FILE with the Commission, within thirty (30) days of the release of this Order to Show Cause, a written appearance stating that he will appear on the date fixed for hearing and present evidence on the issues specified herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 1.92(c) of the Commission's rules, if Lonnie L. Keeney fails to timely file a written appearance within the thirty (30)-day period, or has not filed a petition to accept, for good cause shown, a written appearance beyond the expiration of the thirty (30)-day period, the right to a hearing shall be deemed to be waived. Where a hearing is waived, the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4676A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4676A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4676A1.txt
  • of appearance to state that Mr. Landis would appear on the hearing date and present evidence on the specified issues. In addition, the OSC informed Mr. Landis that, if he failed to so file a written notice of appearance, his right to a hearing would be deemed waived, and the hearing proceeding would be resolved thereafter in accordance with Section 1.92(c) of the Commission's rules. The Presiding Judge determined that Mr. Landis had received a copy of the OSC but had failed to file a written notice of appearance seeking to avail himself of the right to a hearing. Mr. Landis sent separate letters to the Chief of the Enforcement Bureau and the Presiding Judge, stating that he could not appear
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1580A1.pdf
  • in Vietnam, a WTO Member county, and agrees to accept and abide by the reporting requirements in section 1.767(l) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.767(l). Cable Design and Capacity: The AAG system will be approximately 19,000 kilometers in length, with spans of 2 to 3 fiber pairs, depending upon the segment. The AAG has a design capacity of 1.92 terabits per second ("Tbps") for 2-fiber pair segments, and a maximum of 2.88 Tbps for 3-fiber pair segments. The United States terminal points will initially operate at 540 gigabits per second ("Gbps"). The cable system will employ a Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing Erbium Doped Fiber amplifier system, which will provide 96 wavelengths of 10 Gbps on each fiber pair. The
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2082A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2082A1.txt
  • connecting Madang, Papua New Guinea with a branching unit located on the Australia-Guam Trunk. There will be an additional branching unit allowing for a future connection to Popondetta, Papua New Guinea. The Australia-Guam Trunk will consist of two optical fiber pairs, with a design capacity of 96 wavelengths (10 Gbps) on each fiber pair, for a total design capacity of 1.92 Tbps. The initial configuration of the Australia-Guam Trunk will provide a total of 140 Gbps of capacity. The initial configuration of the PNG Spur will provide a total of 20 Gbps of capacity, 10 Gbps on the Papua New Guinea-Guam route and 10 Gbps on the Papua New Guinea-Australia route. Cable Landing Point Arrangements: The PPC 1 System will use
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1370A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1370A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1370A1.txt
  • for Station KBKH(FM), Shamrock, Texas ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) EB Docket No. 06-163 File No. EB-03-IH-0130 File No. BRH-20050401AAA Facility ID No. 81640 Memorandum opinion and ORDER Adopted: June 22, 2009 Released: June 22, 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION By this Memorandum Opinion and Order, we dismiss the above-captioned proceeding pursuant to Section 1.92(d) of the Commission's rules. Based upon the evidence of his felony conviction, we conclude that Terry Keith Hammond lacks the basic requisite character qualifications to be and remain a Commission licensee, and note that such conclusion would have warranted revocation of the license for Station KBKH(FM) (the ``Station'') prior to its cancellation. Our actions herein are taken pursuant to authority
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-456A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-456A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-456A1.txt
  • his attorney, to file with the Commission within 30 days of release of the OSC a written appearance stating his intention to appear on the date fixed for hearing and present evidence on the specified issues. The OSC informed Mr. Keeney that if he failed to file a timely written appearance, his right to a hearing would, pursuant to Section 1.92(c) of the Commission's Rules, be deemed to be waived, and the Presiding Administrative Law Judge would thereafter issue an order terminating the hearing and certifying the case to the Commission for resolution. On January 25, 2008, the Presiding Administrative Law Judge released Lonnie L. Kenney, Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 08M-03 (ALJ, rel. January 25, 2008) (``MO&O''). The MO&O initially
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2060A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2060A2.txt
  • in these coordinations would be approximately 4.6. For a possible coordination arc of 6�, the average number of satellites involved in the coordination increases to 6. It has been noted that the distribution of satellites currently in orbit is significantly non-uniform over the 360� geostationary arc. In the arc 139 �W to 180 �E the average orbital separation becomes about 1.92�9 while there are only two satellites in the interval (139 �W-180 �W). The largest arc without a satellite using the frequencies 3 700-4 200 MHz extends from 139 �W to 167 �W. Therefore, for a 5� coordination arc a hypothetical filing at, for instance, 153 �W would have to coordinate with several satellite networks but at the moment none of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2060A2_Rcd.pdf
  • in these coordinations would be approximately 4.6. For a possible coordination arc of 6�, the average number of satellites involved in the coordination increases to 6. It has been noted that the distribution of satellites currently in orbit is significantly non-uniform over the 360� geostationary arc. In the arc 139 �W to 180 �E the average orbital separation becomes about 1.92�9 while there are only two satellites in the interval (139 �W-180 �W). The largest arc without a satellite using the frequencies 3 700-4 200 MHz extends from 139 �W to 167 �W. Therefore, for a 5� coordination arc a hypothetical filing at, for instance, 153 �W would have to coordinate with several satellite networks but at the moment none of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-916A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-916A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-916A1.txt
  • file with the Commission within 30 days of release thereof, a written appearance stating his intention to appear on the date fixed for hearing and present evidence on the specified issues. The Order to Show Cause informed Mr. Keeney that if he failed to file a timely written appearance, his right to a hearing would be waived pursuant to Section 1.92(c) of the Commission's rules, and the Presiding Administrative Law Judge would thereafter issue an order terminating the hearing and certifying the case to the Commission for resolution. The ALJ issued Lonnie L. Keeney, Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 08M-13 (ALJ, rel. January 25, 2008) (``MO&O''), holding that Mr. Keeney had failed to file a written appearance and that his representations
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-246A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-246A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-246A1.txt
  • this proceeding, Shenzhen, in person or by an attorney, SHALL FILE with the Commission, within thirty (30) days of the release of this Order to Show Cause, a written appearance stating that it will appear at the hearing and present evidence on the issues specified above. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 312(c) of the Act and sections 1.92(c) and 2.939(b) of the Rules, if Shenzhen fails to file a timely notice of appearance within the thirty (30) day period, or has not filed a petition to accept, for good cause shown, a written appearance beyond the expiration of the thirty (30)-day period, its right to a hearing SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE WAIVED. In the event that Shenzhen
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-646A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-646A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-646A1.txt
  • -2.22 0.03 * PctUndepPlant 0.008 0.001 6.47 0.00 * LnDensity -0.128 0.034 -3.72 0.00 * LnExchanges 0.125 0.032 3.94 0.00 * PctBedrock36 0.279 0.098 2.84 0.01 * Difficulty 0.114 0.057 2.02 0.04 * Climate 0.135 0.020 6.91 0.00 * PctTribalLand 0.002 0.001 2.79 0.01 * PctParkLand 0.006 0.004 1.65 0.10 * PctUrban 0.002 0.001 2.52 0.01 * Alaska 0.299 0.155 1.92 0.06 * Midwest 0.134 0.063 2.13 0.03 * Northeast 0.015 0.085 0.18 0.86 Constant 8.198 0.255 32.21 0.00 * N = 726 Pseudo R2 = 0.6234 Notes: An * indicates significance at the 0.10 level. P-values are based on Wald statistics. Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 APPENDIX B Quantile Regression Cost Per Loop (CPL) $511 $595 $1,779
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-205321A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-205321A1.txt
  • OTHER - Remote 1 Red Mesa,AZ - OTHER - Remote 1 Red Mesa,AZ - OTHER - E000489 SES-LIC-20000808-01388 WILLIAMS COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Application for Authority Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service, International Fixed Satellite Service 40 � 44 ' 3.00 " N LAT. SITE ID: COM-21 27 RANDOLPH STREET, CARTERET, NJ 74 � 13 ' 1.92 " W LONG. LOCATION: ANDREW 1 5.6 meters ANTENNA ID: ES56 75.30 dBW COMPRESSED DIGITAL VIDEO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 36M0G1F 75.30 dBW COMPRESSED DIGITAL VIDEO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 31M2G2F 71.70 dBW COMPRESSED DIGITAL VIDEO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 8M00G7W 75.30 dBW DIGITAL DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 36M0G1W 63.10 dBW DIGITAL DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 1M54G7D 54.85
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206497A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206497A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206497A1.txt
  • Docket No. 99-255). Request of the American Society for Health Care Engineering of the American Hospital Association for Certification as WMTS Frequency Coordinator. In the Matter of Ronald Brasher Licensee of Private Land Mobile Stations WPLQ202, KCG967, WPLD495, WPKH771, WPK1739, WPK1733, WPK1707, WIL990, WPLQ475, WPLY658, WPKY903, WPKY901, WPLZ533, WPK1762, and WPDU262 (EB Docket No. 00-156). Joint Statement Pursuant to Section 1.92 of the Rules - Jim Sumpter, Norma Sumpter, Melissa Sumpter, and Jennifer Hill. -3- In the Matter of Redesignation of the 17.7 - 19.7 GHz Frequency Band, Blanket Licensing of Satellite Earth Stations in the 17.7 - 20.2 GHz and 27.5 - 30.0 GHz Frequency Bands, and the Allocation of Additional Spectrum in the 17.3 - 17.8 GHz and 24.75
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208380A7.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208380A7.txt
  • 48 3,532 4,580 0.87 0.71 1.64 2.32 7 23 n.a. 21 18India 1,453 1,986 23 3,462 734 0.72 1.44 1.77 2.50 1 24 17 18 12Italy 2,650 709 92 3,451 1,765 3.31 2.60 2.09 2.34 9 25 26 28 27Russia 1,528 1,484 40 3,052 439 1.00 1.53 2.38 3.53 7 26 22 25 22China 1,673 1,320 21 3,014 1,223 1.25 1.92 3.56 4.27 4 27 20 14 13Dominican Republic 2,297 556 0 2,853 633 4.13 5.17 3.10 2.15 2 28 n.a. n.a. n.a.Egypt 270 2,365 0 2,635 68 0.11 1.04 1.75 3.63 7 29 21 24 n.a.Malaysia 680 1,927 0 2,607 173 0.35 0.37 0.37 1.54 1 30 18 15 26Spain 1,493 1,057 2 2,552 1,878 1.41 1.73 1.65 6.01 Top
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-234231A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-234231A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-234231A1.txt
  • Name: KETCHIKAN TV, LLC Requested Facility: Ch No:32 N Latitude: 61-9-42; W Longitude: 149-51-9 ERP (Average): 0.647 kW; HAAT: -74 meters; Antenna: ND Facility ID: 20426 Call Sign: WTWO-DT File No: BDSTA-20030129AMX City: TERRE HAUTE State: IN Grant Date: 02/27/2003 Licensee Name: NEXSTAR BROADCASTING OF THE MIDWEST, INC. Requested Facility: Ch No:36 N Latitude: 39-14-33; W Longitude: 87-23-29 ERP (Average): 1.92 kW; HAAT: 268.2 meters; Antenna: DA Facility ID: 21536 Call Sign: WCIV-DT File No: BDSTA-20030130AHT City: CHARLESTON State: SC Grant Date: 02/24/2003 Licensee Name: WCIV, LLC Requested Facility: Ch No:34 N Latitude: 32-55-28; W Longitude: 79-41-58 ERP (Average): 20 kW; HAAT: 522 meters; Antenna: ND Facility ID: 67089 Call Sign: KING-DT File No: BDSTA-20030131AJV City: LAS VEGAS State: NV Grant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.txt
  • Table 18 Average U.S. Billed Revenue per Minute for International Telephone Service By Region of the World Average Revenue per Minute 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 200210 Year Decline Africa $1.48 $1.38 $1.34 $1.29 $1.08 $1.01 $0.81 $0.71 $0.57 $0.40 $0.29 -80% Antarctica and Maritime 10.15 10.25 8.37 4.37 6.97 3.80 1.67 3.61 3.83 3.73 1.92 -81 Asia 1.54 1.45 1.25 1.17 0.92 0.82 0.71 0.64 0.55 0.38 0.31 -80 Caribbean 0.98 1.02 0.96 0.97 0.84 0.75 0.66 0.48 0.44 0.32 0.25 -74 Eastern Europe 1.37 1.40 1.30 1.21 1.02 1.02 0.70 0.55 0.51 0.32 0.22 -84 Middle East 1.37 1.36 1.22 1.23 1.06 1.08 0.91 0.71 0.64 0.47 0.33 -76 North and Central America 0.65
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255118A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255118A1.txt
  • Subs -0.06*** (4.96) -0.17*** (6.73) Missing Subs -0.51** (2.21) -2.10** (2.12) Vertical Integration 0.00 (0.07) -0.01 (1.15) Spinoff -1.21** (2.40) -1.50*** (2.95) Missing Vertical or Spinoff 0.26 (1.23) -0.22 (1.22) Born before 1984 -0.74 (1.62) -1.08** (2.01) Duration 2 years -1.03*** (3.91) Duration 3 years -0.93*** (3.36) Duration 4 years -0.49* (1.91) Duration 5 years -0.82** (2.43) Duration 6 years -1.92*** (3.23) Duration 7 years -0.44 (1.25) Duration 8 years -0.60 (1.36) Duration 10 years -0.47 (3.47) Duration 12 years -0.35 (0.55) Duration 13 years -1.03 (0.98) Duration 19 years 1.52 (1.29) Constant Observations 305 305 Failures 96 96 Likelihood Ratio -364.60*** -324.91*** * - significant at 10% level, ** - significant at 5% level, *** - significant at 1% level
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.txt
  • Table 18 Average U.S. Billed Revenue per Minute for International Telephone Service By Region of the World Average Revenue per Minute 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 10 Year Decline Africa $1.38 $1.34 $1.29 $1.08 $1.01 $0.81 $0.71 $0.57 $0.40 $0.29 $0.21 -85% Antarctica and Maritime 10.25 8.37 4.37 6.97 3.80 1.67 3.61 3.83 3.73 1.92 1.48 -86 Asia 1.45 1.25 1.17 0.92 0.82 0.71 0.64 0.55 0.38 0.31 0.22 -85 Caribbean 1.02 0.96 0.97 0.84 0.75 0.66 0.48 0.44 0.32 0.25 0.24 -77 Eastern Europe 1.40 1.30 1.21 1.02 1.02 0.70 0.55 0.51 0.32 0.22 0.17 -88 Middle East 1.36 1.22 1.23 1.06 1.08 0.91 0.71 0.64 0.47 0.33 0.25 -81 North and Central America
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • End-User Revenues Revenues 1 - 48 Table 1.19 Information for Allocating CLEC Revenues: 2003 (Dollars in Millions) CLEC Allocation Interstate InterstateIntrastateIntrastate Lines Percentage End-User Total End-User Total Jun 03 1/ Revenues RevenuesRevenuesRevenues Alabama 265,556 NA 0.98% $41 $64 $80 $102 Alaska NA NA NA NA NA NA NA American Samoa NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Arizona 519,128 NA 1.92 81 124 156 199 Arkansas * 140,865 0.46 19 30 37 47 California 3,046,959 NA 11.29 475 729 915 1,167 Colorado 495,007 NA 1.83 77 118 149 190 Connecticut 234,372 NA 0.87 37 56 70 90 Delaware * 53,540 0.17 7 11 14 18 District of Columbia 174,584 NA 0.65 27 42 52 67 Florida 1,552,996 NA 5.75 242 371
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A13.txt
  • KY (70) (54) (16) 22.86 ALLTEL Kentucky, Inc. - Lexington KY (352) (263) (89) 25.28 Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company - Kentucky KY 43 32 0 0.00 BellSouth - Kentucky KY (17,188) (17,291) 103 (0.60) BellSouth - Louisiana LA (17,608) (17,859) 251 (1.43) Verizon - New England - Maine ME (14,862) (14,773) (89) 0.60 Verizon - Maryland MD 38,972 39,722 (750) (1.92) Verizon - New England - Massachusetts MA 37,342 38,724 (1,382) (3.70) Verizon - North - Michigan MI (19,859) (19,849) (10) 0.05 SBC - Ameritech - Michigan MI (13,517) (13,317) (200) 1.48 Qwest - Minnesota MN 4,189 4,492 (302) (7.21) BellSouth - Mississippi MS (33,882) (34,001) 119 (0.35) SBC - Southwestern Bell - Missouri MO 54,985 54,946 39 0.07 Sprint -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A3.txt
  • End-User Revenues Revenues 1 - 48 Table 1.19 Information for Allocating CLEC Revenues: 2003 (Dollars in Millions) CLEC Allocation Interstate InterstateIntrastateIntrastate Lines Percentage End-User Total End-User Total Jun 03 1/ Revenues RevenuesRevenuesRevenues Alabama 265,556 NA 0.98% $41 $64 $80 $102 Alaska NA NA NA NA NA NA NA American Samoa NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Arizona 519,128 NA 1.92 81 124 156 199 Arkansas * 140,865 0.46 19 30 37 47 California 3,046,959 NA 11.29 475 729 915 1,167 Colorado 495,007 NA 1.83 77 118 149 190 Connecticut 234,372 NA 0.87 37 56 70 90 Delaware * 53,540 0.17 7 11 14 18 District of Columbia 174,584 NA 0.65 27 42 52 67 Florida 1,552,996 NA 5.75 242 371
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • 0.01 0.47 0.24 0.13 1.36 Idaho 2.40 0.01 0.00 0.21 0.74 1.80 0.90 6.06 Illinois 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.55 Indiana 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.22 0.56 0.19 1.23 Iowa 0.72 0.05 0.00 0.23 1.13 0.28 1.05 3.47 Kansas 3.26 0.03 0.00 0.29 1.42 0.38 0.67 6.06 Kentucky 0.69 0.01 0.62 0.10 0.47 0.64 0.18 2.70 Louisiana 1.92 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.58 0.34 0.22 3.39 Maine 0.76 0.00 0.18 0.28 0.69 0.03 0.70 2.64 Maryland 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.06 Massachusetts 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.04 Michigan 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.15 0.01 0.12 0.66 Minnesota 0.75 0.02 0.00 0.22 0.83 0.12 0.56 2.50 Mississippi 0.81 0.00 5.67 0.11 0.28 0.74 0.14
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 914 924 914 2002 957 972 851 952 934 987 936 2003 956 967 875 932 917 1002 941 2004 990 1000 923 988 946 1031 971 1980 1.94% 1.94% 1.95% 1.89% 2.09% 1.78% 1981 2.05 2.05 2.10 2.04 2.14 1.90 1982 2.08 2.08 2.07 2.01 2.09 2.16 1983 2.11 2.11 2.15 2.01 2.28 1.95 1984 1.98 1.98 1.97% 2.01 1.92 2.06 1.89 1985 1.94 1.93 1.98 2.01 1.85 1.97 1.93 1986 1.97 1.95 2.16 1.89 1.96 2.12 1.87 1987 2.04 2.01 2.32 2.02 2.02 2.17 1.95 1988 2.07 2.04 2.31 1.99 2.01 2.21 2.03 1989 2.04 2.02 2.19 2.02 2.04 2.18 1.87 1990 2.09 2.07 2.24 2.08 2.11 2.28 1.88 1991 2.09 2.04 2.42 2.01 2.15 2.20 1.95 1992 2.09
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 13 Illinois 1,672,522 NA 5.22 245 335 439 555 Indiana 501,936 NA 1.57 74 101 132 167 Iowa 199,115 NA 0.62 29 40 52 66 Kansas 316,946 NA 0.99 46 64 83 105 Kentucky 218,810 NA 0.68 32 44 57 73 Louisiana 283,333 NA 0.88 42 57 74 94 Maine 113,957 NA 0.36 17 23 30 38 Maryland 615,757 NA 1.92 90 123 162 204 Massachusetts 997,760 NA 3.11 146 200 262 331 Michigan 1,575,267 NA 4.92 231 316 413 523 Minnesota 604,152 NA 1.89 89 121 159 201 Mississippi 131,218 NA 0.41 19 26 34 44 Missouri 430,538 NA 1.34 63 86 113 143 Montana * 23,578 0.08 4 5 7 9 Nebraska 205,560 NA 0.64 30 41 54 68
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A3.txt
  • 13 Illinois 1,672,522 NA 5.22 245 335 439 555 Indiana 501,936 NA 1.57 74 101 132 167 Iowa 199,115 NA 0.62 29 40 52 66 Kansas 316,946 NA 0.99 46 64 83 105 Kentucky 218,810 NA 0.68 32 44 57 73 Louisiana 283,333 NA 0.88 42 57 74 94 Maine 113,957 NA 0.36 17 23 30 38 Maryland 615,757 NA 1.92 90 123 162 204 Massachusetts 997,760 NA 3.11 146 200 262 331 Michigan 1,575,267 NA 4.92 231 316 413 523 Minnesota 604,152 NA 1.89 89 121 159 201 Mississippi 131,218 NA 0.41 19 26 34 44 Missouri 430,538 NA 1.34 63 86 113 143 Montana * 23,578 0.08 4 5 7 9 Nebraska 205,560 NA 0.64 30 41 54 68
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.txt
  • 10.00 9.85 8.08 13.50 13.35 Vermont 8.13 8.25 8.16 0.00 3.50 3.50 0.00 1.75 1.75 8.13 10.00 9.91 8.13 13.50 13.41 Virgin Islands 8.25 8.25 8.25 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 10.00 10.00 10.00 13.50 13.50 13.50 Virginia 6.62 8.25 7.47 1.76 3.50 3.26 0.88 1.75 1.63 7.50 10.00 9.10 9.26 13.50 12.35 Washington 6.97 8.25 7.82 0.00 3.50 1.92 0.00 1.75 0.96 6.97 10.00 8.78 6.97 13.50 10.70 West Virginia 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 2.75 0.00 1.75 1.37 8.25 10.00 9.62 8.25 13.50 12.37 Wisconsin 6.81 8.25 7.25 0.00 3.50 1.23 0.00 1.75 0.61 6.81 10.00 7.86 6.81 13.50 9.08 Wyoming 8.16 8.25 8.20 3.32 3.50 3.40 1.66 1.75 1.70 9.82 10.00 9.90 13.14 13.50 13.30 Nationwide $1.75
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • TEL. CO. -0.67 -4.13 3.60 -1.34 310680 C CHIPPEWA COUNTY TEL. CO. 1.17 -3.20 4.51 1.62 310682 C FRONTIER COMM. OF MICHIGAN, INC. 8.72 -9.27 19.84 0.00 310683 C CARR TEL. CO. 17.57 -5.81 24.83 162.76 310685 C CHATHAM TEL. CO.-MI -2.01 -6.91 5.26 0.25 310688 A CLIMAX TEL. CO. 8.45 -6.36 15.81 194.38 310689 C CENTURYTEL OF UPPER MICHIGAN -1.92 -4.19 2.37 -5.45 310691 C DEERFIELD FARMERS TEL. CO. 1.38 -4.20 5.83 2.27 310692 A DRENTHE TEL. CO. 4.75 0.13 4.61 6.01 310694 A FARMERS MUT. OF CHAPIN DBA CHAPIN TEL. CO. 3.54 -0.70 4.27 3.41 310695 C VERIZON NORTH INC.-MI -0.83 -4.03 3.33 0.00 310702 C CENTURYTEL OF MICHIGAN, INC. 1.23 -2.97 4.33 1.33 310703 A KALEVA TEL. CO.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • 9,173 0 0.00 0 0.00 80 0.87 1983 9,156 0 0.00 0 0.00 171 1.87 1984 9,102 0 0.00 0 0.00 347 3.81 1985 9,124 0 0.00 0 0.00 860 9.43 1986 9,167 0 0.00 0 0.00 1,620 17.67 1987 9,190 29 0.32 4 0.04 2,538 27.62 1988 9,300 435 4.68 82 0.88 3,577 38.46 1989 9,338 931 9.97 179 1.92 4,403 47.15 1990 9,872 2,428 24.59 600 6.08 5,816 58.91 1991 9,951 3,670 36.88 920 9.25 6,636 66.69 1992 10,069 5,392 53.55 1,219 12.11 7,530 74.78 1993 10,089 6,688 66.29 1,874 18.57 8,239 81.66 1994 10,023 8,334 83.15 2,400 23.94 8,795 87.75 1995 10,051 8,977 89.31 2,868 28.53 9,015 89.69 1996 9,966 9,286 93.18 3,329 33.40 9,247 92.79 1997 9,965
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277237A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277237A1.txt
  • Singapore, and Thailand. The system can interconnect with existing submarine cables that serve the Asia-Pacific region, and also is designed to allow future extensions to Australia, India, Indonesia, Africa, and Europe. The AAG system will be approximately 19,000 kilometers in length, with spans of 2 to 3 fiber pairs, depending upon the segment. The AAG has a design capacity of 1.92 terabits per second ("Tbps") for 2-fiber pair segments, and a maximum of 2.88 Tbps for 3-fiber pair segments. The United States terminal points will initially operate at 540 gigabits per second ("Gbps"). The cable system will employ a Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing Erbium Doped Fiber amplifier system, which will provide 96 wavelengths of 10 Gbps on each fiber pair. The
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • minutes and access revenues. % of Nation Access Minutes % of Nation 3/ Totals in the last two columns include revenues for locations not estimated. 1 - 54 Table 1.26 Information for Allocating Interstate Toll: 2005 Access MinutesAllocation for Percentage Allocation 1/ Alabama 6,207,659 1.56% $540 $729 Alaska NA NA NA NA American Samoa NA NA NA NA Arizona 7,641,971 1.92 664 897 Arkansas 4,051,568 1.02 352 476 California 39,174,961 9.82 3,406 4,600 Colorado 7,688,254 1.93 668 903 Connecticut 7,700,937 1.93 670 904 Delaware 1,625,899 0.41 141 191 District of Columbia 2,149,087 0.54 187 252 Florida 29,664,188 7.44 2,579 3,483 Georgia 13,027,789 3.27 1,133 1,530 Guam NA NA NA NA Hawaii 1,471,109 0.37 128 173 Idaho 2,360,787 0.59 205 277 Illinois
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A3.txt
  • minutes and access revenues. % of Nation Access Minutes % of Nation 3/ Totals in the last two columns include revenues for locations not estimated. 1 - 54 Table 1.26 Information for Allocating Interstate Toll: 2005 Access MinutesAllocation for Percentage Allocation 1/ Alabama 6,207,659 1.56% $540 $729 Alaska NA NA NA NA American Samoa NA NA NA NA Arizona 7,641,971 1.92 664 897 Arkansas 4,051,568 1.02 352 476 California 39,174,961 9.82 3,406 4,600 Colorado 7,688,254 1.93 668 903 Connecticut 7,700,937 1.93 670 904 Delaware 1,625,899 0.41 141 191 District of Columbia 2,149,087 0.54 187 252 Florida 29,664,188 7.44 2,579 3,483 Georgia 13,027,789 3.27 1,133 1,530 Guam NA NA NA NA Hawaii 1,471,109 0.37 128 173 Idaho 2,360,787 0.59 205 277 Illinois
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • 11.11 -5.17 17.17 0.00 351171 A FARMERS MUTUAL TEL. CO.-JESUP -0.61 -2.81 2.26 -18.65 351172 A FARMERS MUTUAL TEL. CO.-NORA SPRINGS 8.70 -0.87 9.65 33.77 351173 A FARMERS MUTUAL TEL. COOP.-SHELLSBURG 6.76 -1.58 8.47 27.26 351174 A FARMERS MUTUAL TEL. CO.-STANTON 10.04 -6.83 18.10 46.01 351175 A FARMERS TEL. CO.-BATAVIA 8.21 -8.60 18.40 45.74 351176 A FARMERS TEL. CO.-ESSEX 3.43 -1.92 5.46 13.50 351177 A FARMERS TEL. CO.-RICEVILLE 12.45 -3.13 16.09 46.16 351178 C IOWA TELECOMM. SVCS. DBA IOWA TELECOM 2.51 -4.10 6.88 0.00 351179 A FENTON COOP. TEL. CO. 13.27 -4.68 18.83 47.19 351187 A PARTNER COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE 3.71 -8.42 13.25 44.47 351188 A GOLDFIELD TEL. CO. 11.07 1.91 8.99 33.54 351189 A RIVER VALLEY TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOP. 10.52 -3.54 14.58
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280982A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280982A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280982A1.txt
  • endstream endobj 34 0 obj<>stream �V� cb� endstream endobj 35 0 obj<>stream nx� �7U o`z�~�X���| �� endstream endobj 36 0 obj<>stream }C�����$+� �c�-``鯭�WJB�\;^� ��`��J<�T``-�@�N��c�ф���Px�ӄ2~%�W(c)�78 @ g v� endstream endobj 37 0 obj<>stream endstream endobj 38 0 obj<>/ColorSpace<>/ProcSet[/PDF/ImageB]/ExtGState<>>> endobj 39 0 obj<1.92 1.92 0 -0.000012 0.000012]/PatternType 1/Resources 38 0 R/XStep 1/Type/Pattern/TilingType 1/YStep 1/BBox[0 0 1 1]>>stream � endstream endobj 40 0 obj<> endobj 41 0 obj<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]/ExtGState<>>> endobj 42 0 obj<>stream ���������^ 5� �`�C�.0����/B� �|�q��8�s�� R�E...FK��' z
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282571A1.pdf
  • connect Madang, Papua New Guinea, with a branching unit located on the Australia-Guam Trunk. There will be an additional branching unit allowing for a future connection to Popondetta, Papua New Guinea. The Australia-Guam Trunk will consist of two optical fiber pairs, with a design capacity of 96 wavelengths (10 Gbps) on each fiber pair, for a total design capacity of 1.92 Tbps. The initial configuration of the Australia-Guam Trunk will provide a total of 140 Gbps of capacity. The initial configuration of the PNG Spur will provide a total of 20 Gbps of capacity, 10 Gbps on the Papua New Guinea-Guam route and 10 Gbps on the Papua New Guinea-Australia route. PPC 1 (US), Inc. will construct, own, and operate the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • Building Tomorrow's Network, p.30 3 U.S. Census Bureau, Annual Capital Expenditures: 2006, (Issued January 24, 2008) Table 4a, http://www.census.gov/csd/ace/xls/2006/Full%20Report.htm (last visited February 4, 2008.) Year End Total Signaling System 7 ISDN Digital Stored Switches Switches Switches Program Controlled Switches 1987 9,190 29 0.32% 4 0.04% 2,538 27.62% 1988 9,300 435 4.68 82 0.88 3,577 38.46 1989 9,338 931 9.97 179 1.92 4,403 47.15 1990 9,872 2,428 24.59 600 6.08 5,816 58.91 1991 9,951 3,670 36.88 920 9.25 6,636 66.69 1992 10,069 5,392 53.55 1,219 12.11 7,530 74.78 1993 10,089 6,688 66.29 1,874 18.57 8,239 81.66 1994 10,023 8,334 83.15 2,400 23.94 8,795 87.75 1995 10,051 8,977 89.31 2,868 28.53 9,015 89.69 1996 9,966 9,286 93.18 3,329 33.40 9,247 92.79 1997 9,965
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • 917 1,002 941 2004 990 1,000 923 988 946 1,031 971 2005 1,048 1,055 966 1,035 1,000 1,085 1,047 2006 1,087 1,091 1,038 1,051 998 1,167 1,081 1980 1.94% 1.94% 1.95% 1.89% 2.09% 1.78% 1981 2.05 2.05 2.10 2.04 2.14 1.90 1982 2.08 2.08 2.07 2.01 2.09 2.16 1983 2.11 2.11 2.15 2.01 2.28 1.95 1984 1.98 1.98 1.97% 2.01 1.92 2.06 1.89 1985 1.94 1.93 1.98 2.01 1.85 1.97 1.93 1986 1.97 1.95 2.16 1.89 1.96 2.12 1.87 1987 2.04 2.01 2.32 2.02 2.02 2.17 1.95 1988 2.07 2.04 2.31 1.99 2.01 2.21 2.03 1989 2.04 2.02 2.19 2.02 2.04 2.18 1.87 1990 2.09 2.07 2.24 2.08 2.11 2.28 1.88 1991 2.09 2.04 2.42 2.01 2.15 2.20 1.95 1992 2.09
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • and Technology Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Local Telephone Competition (March 2008). 2/ Totals in the last four columns include revenues for locations not estimated. 1 - 48 Table 1.20 Information for Allocating Mobile Wireless Revenues: 2006 Alabama 3,276 1.51% $1,262 $395 $1,322 $413 Alaska NA NA NA NA NA NA American Samoa NA NA NA NA NA NA Arizona 4,153 1.92 1,600 501 1,676 523 Arkansas 1,924 0.89 741 232 776 242 California 27,497 12.68 10,590 3,315 11,095 3,464 Colorado 3,428 1.58 1,320 413 1,383 432 Connecticut 2,582 1.19 995 311 1,042 325 Delaware 650 0.30 250 78 262 82 District of Columbia 879 0.41 338 106 355 111 Florida 14,177 6.54 5,460 1,709 5,720 1,786 Georgia 6,865 3.17 2,644 828
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A3.pdf
  • and Technology Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Local Telephone Competition (March 2008). 2/ Totals in the last four columns include revenues for locations not estimated. 1 - 48 Table 1.20 Information for Allocating Mobile Wireless Revenues: 2006 Alabama 3,276 1.51% $1,262 $395 $1,322 $413 Alaska NA NA NA NA NA NA American Samoa NA NA NA NA NA NA Arizona 4,153 1.92 1,600 501 1,676 523 Arkansas 1,924 0.89 741 232 776 242 California 27,497 12.68 10,590 3,315 11,095 3,464 Colorado 3,428 1.58 1,320 413 1,383 432 Connecticut 2,582 1.19 995 311 1,042 325 Delaware 650 0.30 250 78 262 82 District of Columbia 879 0.41 338 106 355 111 Florida 14,177 6.54 5,460 1,709 5,720 1,786 Georgia 6,865 3.17 2,644 828
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • 1.03 Minnesota 1.34 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.43 0.11 0.62 3.59 Mississippi 0.99 0.02 0.00 5.63 0.00 0.59 0.69 0.17 8.09 Missouri 1.25 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.89 0.25 0.21 2.64 Montana 3.53 0.03 0.00 2.77 0.00 2.93 0.12 1.03 10.41 Nebraska 2.15 0.07 0.00 0.72 0.00 2.11 0.60 1.25 6.91 Nevada 0.41 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.38 0.67 0.44 1.92 New Hampshire 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.21 0.50 1.05 New Jersey 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.02 New Mexico 2.20 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.33 0.79 0.69 5.03 New York 0.04 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.11 0.09 0.33 North Carolina 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.43 0.09 1.15 North Dakota 3.70 0.23 0.01
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A7.pdf
  • Mexico 329 856 0.38 New York 27 1,537 0.02 North Carolina 150 2,612 0.06 North Dakota 695 367 1.89 Northern Mariana Islands 0 69 0.00 Ohio 85 2,139 0.04 Oklahoma 129 1,378 0.09 Oregon 12 977 0.01 Pennsylvania 58 1,893 0.03 Puerto Rico 0 3,859 0.00 Rhode Island 0 55 0.00 South Carolina 51 1,205 0.04 South Dakota 964 503 1.92 Tennessee 167 1,827 0.09 Texas 958 3,280 0.29 Utah 746 531 1.41 Vermont 83 448 0.18 Virgin Islands 41 109 0.38 Virginia 312 1,503 0.21 Washington 68 1,136 0.06 West Virginia 119 1,043 0.11 Wisconsin 2,169 1,757 1.23 Wyoming 115 354 0.33 Totals $38,345 58,795 $0.65 1 Source: USAC data. Rollups performed by the Industry Analysis and Technology Division, Wireline
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • ROCKLAND, INC. -5.77 -2.52 -3.33 -11.22 472233 C RURAL TELEPHONE COMPANY - ID 9.93 -5.46 16.27 13.42 472295 C SILVER STAR TEL. CO. INC.-ID 10.70 -1.96 12.91 14.50 472416 C VERIZON NORTHWEST INC.-ID 0.12 -4.43 4.76 -47.39 472423 C INLAND TELEPHONE COMPANY - ID -7.16 -8.43 1.39 -9.01 474427 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF ID DBA FRONTIER COMM OF ID -1.92 -1.08 -0.85 -26.19 475103 C QWEST CORPORATION - ID 43.33 -7.10 54.28 0.00 475162 C QWEST CORPORATION - IDAHO -2.52 -5.75 3.43 0.00 ILLINOIS TOTAL 1.09 -7.16 8.89 -7.06 340976 A ADAMS TEL. COOP. -17.80 -4.40 -14.01 -49.71 340978 C ALHAMBRA-GRANTFORK TEL. CO. -1.88 0.52 -2.38 -42.84 340983 A CAMBRIDGE TEL. CO.-IL -7.67 -10.24 2.86 -28.36 340984 C CASS TELEPHONE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • ROCKLAND, INC. -5.77 -2.52 -3.33 -11.22 472233 C RURAL TELEPHONE COMPANY - ID 9.93 -5.46 16.27 13.42 472295 C SILVER STAR TEL. CO. INC.-ID 10.70 -1.96 12.91 14.50 472416 C VERIZON NORTHWEST INC.-ID 0.12 -4.43 4.76 -47.39 472423 C INLAND TELEPHONE COMPANY - ID -7.16 -8.43 1.39 -9.01 474427 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF ID DBA FRONTIER COMM OF ID -1.92 -1.08 -0.85 -26.19 475103 C QWEST CORPORATION - ID 43.33 -7.10 54.28 0.00 475162 C QWEST CORPORATION - IDAHO -2.52 -5.75 3.43 0.00 ILLINOIS TOTAL 1.09 -7.16 8.89 -7.06 340976 A ADAMS TEL. COOP. -17.80 -4.40 -14.01 -49.71 340978 C ALHAMBRA-GRANTFORK TEL. CO. -1.88 0.52 -2.38 -42.84 340983 A CAMBRIDGE TEL. CO.-IL -7.67 -10.24 2.86 -28.36 340984 C CASS TELEPHONE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301482A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301482A1.txt
  • Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) E000489 SES-RWL-20100910-01155 E Date Effective: 09/13/2010 Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Grant of Authority 10/11/2010 - 10/11/2025 Renewal All Mobile Video Inc Nature of Service: Domestic Fixed Satellite Service, International Fixed Satellite Service 40 � 44 ' 3.00 " N LAT. SITE ID: COM-21 27 RANDOLPH STREET, CARTERET, NJ 74 � 13 ' 1.92 " W LONG. LOCATION: ANDREW 1 5.6 meters ANTENNA ID: ES56 75.30 dBW COMPRESSED DIGITAL VIDEO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 36M0G1F 75.30 dBW COMPRESSED DIGITAL VIDEO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 31M2G2F 71.70 dBW COMPRESSED DIGITAL VIDEO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 8M00G7W 75.30 dBW DIGITAL DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 36M0G1W 63.10 dBW DIGITAL DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 1M54G7D 54.85
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
  • 0 365 65 769 0.49 Florida 2,869 807 10 5,508 655 9,849 6.24 Georgia 1,329 347 5 2,837 304 4,821 3.06 Guam 22 8 0 25 5 62 0.04 Hawaii 187 34 0 389 43 652 0.41 Idaho 220 37 1 392 50 700 0.44 Illinois 2,012 494 6 3,705 460 6,675 4.23 Indiana 964 168 3 1,680 220 3,035 1.92 Iowa 420 92 2 782 96 1,392 0.88 Kansas 353 125 1 810 81 1,371 0.87 Kentucky 558 148 2 1,165 127 2,000 1.27 Louisiana 618 146 2 1,357 141 2,265 1.44 Maine 209 63 0 339 48 659 0.42 Maryland 1,010 256 2 1,785 231 3,284 2.08 Massachusetts 944 477 2 1,959 216 3,598 2.28 Michigan 1,345 432 4
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A3.txt
  • 0 365 65 769 0.49 Florida 2,869 807 10 5,508 655 9,849 6.24 Georgia 1,329 347 5 2,837 304 4,821 3.06 Guam 22 8 0 25 5 62 0.04 Hawaii 187 34 0 389 43 652 0.41 Idaho 220 37 1 392 50 700 0.44 Illinois 2,012 494 6 3,705 460 6,675 4.23 Indiana 964 168 3 1,680 220 3,035 1.92 Iowa 420 92 2 782 96 1,392 0.88 Kansas 353 125 1 810 81 1,371 0.87 Kentucky 558 148 2 1,165 127 2,000 1.27 Louisiana 618 146 2 1,357 141 2,265 1.44 Maine 209 63 0 339 48 659 0.42 Maryland 1,010 256 2 1,785 231 3,284 2.08 Massachusetts 944 477 2 1,959 216 3,598 2.28 Michigan 1,345 432 4
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.txt
  • 4.45 -3.55 482248 C NORTHERN TEL COOP 12.24 -1.78 14.27 17.25 482249 C CENTURYTEL-MONTANA -0.69 -7.20 7.01 0.00 482250 C PROJECT TEL CO 2.66 -6.27 9.53 4.56 482251 C RANGE TEL COOP-MT 10.35 -2.48 13.15 29.43 482252 A RONAN TEL CO -2.83 -5.50 2.82 -100.00 482254 C SOUTHERN MONTANA TEL 47.29 -3.42 52.50 67.85 482255 C 3-RIVERS TEL COOP 15.41 -1.92 17.67 28.70 482257 C TRIANGLE TEL COOP 23.24 -1.82 25.52 51.44 483308 C BLACKFOOT TEL - CFT 0.61 -3.34 4.09 -6.16 483310 C CENTRAL MONTANA 17.75 -3.07 21.48 29.73 484322 C CITIZENS-FRONTIER-MT 2.26 -4.36 6.92 -100.00 485104 C QWEST CORP-MT -7.61 -10.55 3.29 0.00 TOTAL NEBRASKA -0.59 -7.70 7.70 17.05 371128 C CITIZENS-FRONTIER-NE 65.60 -6.10 76.37 0.00 371516 C ARAPAHOE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A9.txt
  • 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/03 06/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44 07/01/04 06/30/05 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.25 1.53 07/01/05 06/30/06 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.25 1.59 07/01/06 06/30/07 0.01 0.00 0.54 0.25 1.63 07/01/07 06/30/08 0.01 0.00 0.56 0.26 1.71 07/01/08 06/30/09 0.01 0.00 0.63 0.24 1.80 07/01/09 06/30/10 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.26 1.85 07/01/10 06/30/11 0.00 0.00 0.67 0.27 1.92 Source: Access tariff filings. Rates in Effect From To Sensitive per Switched Interstate Charges for Switched Access Service Carrier Common Line per Originating Traffic Non-Traffic Carrier Common Line per Terminating Sensitive per Switched Access Minute 2 Minute 1 4 Although the charges took effect on 7/1/2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did not take effect until 8/11/2000.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.txt
  • 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/03 06/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44 07/01/04 06/30/05 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.25 1.53 07/01/05 06/30/06 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.25 1.59 07/01/06 06/30/07 0.01 0.00 0.54 0.25 1.63 07/01/07 06/30/08 0.01 0.00 0.56 0.26 1.71 07/01/08 06/30/09 0.01 0.00 0.63 0.24 1.80 07/01/09 06/30/10 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.26 1.85 07/01/10 06/30/11 0.00 0.00 0.67 0.27 1.92 07/01/11 06/30/12 0.00 0.00 0.68 0.28 1.98 Access Minute 2 Minute 1 4 Although the charges took effect on 7/1/2000, some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did not take effect until 8/11/2000. 1 This table shows average rates (weighted by minutes of use) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-314A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-314A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-314A1.txt
  • their attorneys, shall each file, within 30 days after receipt of this Order, a written appearance stating that it will appear at the hearing and present evidence on matters specified in that Order. If any of the licensees fail to file a timely written notice of appearance, the right to a hearing shall be deemed to be waived. See Section 1.92(a) of the Commission's rules. Where a hearing is waived the licensee may submit a written, signed statement of mitigation or justification within 30 days of receipt of the Order to Show Cause. See Section 1.92(b) of the Commission's rules. In the event the right to a hearing is waived, the Chief Administrative Law Judge (or presiding officer if one has
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.txt
  • MR-2-01 Network Trouble Report Rate 0.83 1.53 0.81 0.97 0.90 1.12 1.04 1.33 2n,3n MR-4-01 Mean Time To Repair - Total 6.97 6.55 6.20 7.80 5.82 7.68 5.73 7.53 2n MR-4-06 % Out of Service > 4 Hours 59.31 67.31 57.19 61.54 55.67 63.46 50.21 66.67 1n,2n,3n MR-4-08 % Out of Service > 24 Hours 2.15 0.00 2.46 5.13 1.90 1.92 2.05 3.51 2n,3n,4n MR-5-01 % Repeat Reports within 30 Days 22.13 25.00 24.32 28.89 24.56 26.92 27.28 25.81 1n,2n,3n UNEs: Ordering All UNE Orders OR-8-01 % Acknowledgements on Time 99.49 98.21 99.05 98.22 OR-9-01 % Acknowledgement Completeness 96.67 99.90 99.23 99.64 OR-3-01 % Rejects 21.73 23.25 21.87 21.09 OR-4-02 Completion Notice - % On Time 99.58 97.18 99.43 99.59 OR-4-05
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-44A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-44A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-44A1.txt
  • or by its attorney, shall file within 30 days of the release of this Order, a written appearance stating that it will appear at the hearing and present evidence on matters specified in this Order. If the licensee fails to file a timely written notice of appearance, the right to a hearing shall be deemed to be waived. See Section 1.92(a) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.92(a). Where a hearing is waived, the licensee may submit a written, signed statement of mitigation or justification within 30 days of the release of this Order. See Section 1.92(b) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.92(b). In the event the right to a hearing is waived, the Chief Administrative Law Judge (or presiding
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-74A1.txt
  • at the hearing and present evidence on issues specified in � 17, above. If Leslie D. Brewer fails to file a timely written notice of appearance, his right to a hearing on the matter of his captioned Amateur radio station and GMRS licenses shall be deemed to be waived, and the proceeding thereafter shall be conducted in accordance with Section 1.92 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.92. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that Leslie D. Brewer may file his written request for a hearing on the matter of his captioned Amateur radio operator license in a consolidated filing with his written notice of appearance on the matter of his captioned Amateur radio station and GMRS licenses. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-319A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-319A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-319A1.txt
  • days of its receipt of this ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY FOR HEARING, file with the Commission a written appearance stating that it will appear at the hearing and present evidence on the issues specified above. An unexcused failure to each file a timely notice of appearance will constitute a waiver of such hearing, pursuant to Section 1.92(a)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.92(a)(1). 18. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT, if the hearing is waived, RMI may submit written signed statements pursuant to Section 1.92(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.92(b), which can deny, seek to mitigate, or justify its conduct with respect to Station WMGA(AM). In the event that RMI waives its right
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-32A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-32A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-32A1.txt
  • 47 C.F.R. � 1.91(c), SHALL, within thirty days of its receipt of this ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, FILE with the Commission a written appearance stating that it will appear at the hearing and present evidence on the issues specified above. An unexcused failure to file a timely notice of appearance will constitute a waiver of such hearing, pursuant to section 1.92(a)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.92(a)(1). If the hearing is waived, Peninsula Communications, Inc. may submit a written signed statement pursuant to section 1.92(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.92(b), which can deny, seek to mitigate or justify its unauthorized operation of the seven noted translators. In the event Peninsula Communications, Inc. waives its right to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.txt
  • 1,2,3,4,5 B.2.21.8.1.12W Analog Loop Design/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (hours) 3.68 10.03 4.33 8.32 6.54 20.82 5.77 12.93 4.93 14.31 B.2.21.8.2.12W Analog Loop Design/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (hours) 8.15 0.02 13.65 0.02 8.63 21.33 9.59 46.23 4.07 71.48 1,2,3,4,5 B.2.21.9.1.12W Analog Loop Non-Design/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (hours) 3.63 0.51 4.30 1.51 6.53 0.41 5.64 0.23 4.91 0.06 B.2.21.9.1.42W Analog Loop Non-Design/<10 circuits/Dispatch In/FL (hours) 0.98 0.40 1.11 1.92 1.14 0.17 0.95 0.06 0.87 0.02 4,5 B.2.21.9.2.12W Analog Loop Non-Design/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (hours) 8.62 1.01 13.37 2.48 6.53 0.39 4.24 0.41 3.65 0.03 B.2.21.12.1.12W Analog Loop w/LNP Design/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (hours) 3.68 16.77 4.33 7.69 6.54 11.81 5.77 10.83 4.93 13.81 B - 37 Metric Metric Name [SQM Number] May June July August September Number and Disaggregation BST CLEC BST CLEC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-113A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-113A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-113A1.txt
  • 1.108, 1.117. We also note that, should information be brought to our attention at some later date suggesting that the parties to a lease implemented pursuant to this proposed forbearance option had not complied with the requirements and conditions we adopt for such action, the Commission may initiate a formal or informal investigation. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.80, 1.89, 1.91, 1.92. See Craig O. McCaw, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 9 FCC Rcd 5836, 5880-5881 � 76 (1994), aff'd sub nom. SBC Communications, Inc. v. FCC, 56 F.3d 1484 (D.C. Cir. 1995), recon. in part, 10 FCC Rcd 11786 (1995). See generally Policy Statement. We note that this proposal encompasses only services covered by the Report and Order and services that might
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-113A1_Erratum.doc
  • 1.108, 1.117. We also note that, should information be brought to our attention at some later date suggesting that the parties to a lease implemented pursuant to this proposed forbearance option had not complied with the requirements and conditions we adopt for such action, the Commission may initiate a formal or informal investigation. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.80, 1.89, 1.91, 1.92. See Craig O. McCaw, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 9 FCC Rcd 5836, 5880-5881 � 76 (1994), aff'd sub nom. SBC Communications, Inc. v. FCC, 56 F.3d 1484 (D.C. Cir. 1995), recon. in part, 10 FCC Rcd 11786 (1995). See generally Policy Statement. We note that this proposal encompasses only services covered by the Report and Order and services that might
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-158A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-158A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-158A1.txt
  • 1033 (EB 2003). 47 U.S.C. �� 312(a) and 312(c). Id. � 312(g). Id. � 312(d). 47 C.F.R. � 1.91(d). 47 U.S.C. � 309(e). Id. � 503(b)(3)(A). 47 C.F.R. � 1.80. 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(3)(A). 47 C.F.R. � 1.80. 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(3)(A). 47 C.F.R. � 1.80. 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(3)(A). 47 C.F.R. � 1.80. Id. � 1.91(c). See id. �� 1.92(a), 1.221(e). See id. � 1.92(b). See id. � 1.92(c). Id. � 1.221. Id. � 1.221(c). (...continued from previous page) (continued next page) Federal Communications Commission FCC 03-158 Federal Communications Commission FCC 03-158 � � � � '' - - � � � � - - � � � � � � " � � � � (c) � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-79A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-79A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-79A1.txt
  • 17 FCC Rcd at 5630 � 5. We do not expand the language of Section 1.937 to prohibit applications repeating renewal applications that were dismissed without prejudice, as this would bar a licensee whose renewal application was dismissed as late-filed, see 47 C.F.R. � 1.949(a), from seeking a new license to replace the expired license. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.91, 1.92. 5 U.S.C. � 605(b). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 03-79 Federal Communications Commission FCC 03-79 �@��� D L T [ a b c d G H 0 G H 0 l� �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-167A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-167A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-167A1.txt
  • information be brought to our attention at some later date suggesting that the parties to a spectrum lease implemented pursuant to this proposed forbearance option had not complied with the requirements and conditions we adopt for such action, the Commission could initiate a formal or informal investigation. Further Notice at � 268 n.461; see 47 C.F.R. �� 1.80, 1.89, 1.91, 1.92. Further Notice at �� 263-265. All parties commenting on the forbearance proposal supported the Commission's general approach. See, e.g., Blooston Rural Carriers Comments at 11-12; Cantor Fitzgerald Telecom Comments at 2; CTIA Comments at 2-4; Nextel Communications Comments at 6-9; Nextel Partners Reply Comments at 8; PCIA Comments at 5; RTG Comments at 2-5; SBC Comments at 7-10; Spectrum Market
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-124A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-124A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-124A1.txt
  • 1.80 of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 17087, 17100-01, � 27, 17112 Appendix A (1997), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999); see also 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b). 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(3). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.91, � 1.221. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.21(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.221(c). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.92(a). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.92(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.92(c). 47 U.S.C. � 311(a)(2). 47 C.F.R. � 73.3594. 47 C.F.R. � 73.3594(g). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 06-124 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06-124 F � � � � � 0 0 �' �> �? �O �o � Y � v � { '' � � V
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-128A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-128A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-128A1.txt
  • Timothy M. Doty, in person or by their respective attorneys, SHALL FILE with the Commission, within 30 calendar days of the release of this Order to Show Cause, a written appearance in triplicate stating that they will appear on the date fixed for hearing and present evidence on the issues specified herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 1.92(c) of the Commission's rules, if either CRS or Timothy M. Doty or both fails to timely file a written appearance as specified in paragraph 14, above, or has not filed a petition to accept, for good cause shown, a written appearance beyond the expiration of the 30-day period, the right to a hearing as to CRS and/or Mr. Doty SHALL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-125A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-125A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-125A1.txt
  • 503(b)(6). See Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section 1.80 of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 17087, 17100-01, � 27, 17112 Appendix A (1997), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999); see also 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b). 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(3). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.91, � 1.221. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.92(a). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.92(c). (Continued from previous page.) (Continued...) Federal Communications Commission FCC 07-125 Federal Communications Commission FCC 07-125 � & ' ( - < c e y � � � � � � � h h| h| h h| h h h h h 8 h h� h� c c h� h� h� h� h� h�^ � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-165A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-165A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-165A1.txt
  • APPEARANCE stating that they will, individually and/or by legal representative, appear on the date fixed for hearing and present evidence on the issues specified herein. 26. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Chief, Enforcement Bureau, SHALL BE MADE a party to this proceeding without the need to file a notice of appearance. 27. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.92(c) of the Commission's rules, that if Buzz Telecom Corporation, Business Options, Inc., US Bell Corporation, Link Technologies, AVATAR, and/or their principals Kurtis J. Kintzel and/or Keanan Kintzel fail to timely file written appearances within the 20-day period referenced above, or have not filed a petition to accept, for good cause shown, a written appearance beyond the expiration of the 20-day
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-219A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-219A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-219A1.txt
  • Furthermore, the regression yields a reasonable increase in the value of R2, which represents the fraction of the variation in the data that is explained by the regression. The next specification adds age raised to the third power to the previous specification and yields the following results: Regression Specification 3 Independent Variable Coefficient Robust Standard Error t-Statistic Constant 0.1080096 0.0563045 1.92 Age 0.0283781 0.0183821 1.54 Age2 0.0009049 0.0015611 0.58 Age3 -0.0000393 0.0000367 -1.07 R2 = 0.435 This result generates an estimate of the penetration rate of 26.76% for a network five years after launch. The result also yields coefficients that ensure that no network, regardless of its age, has a penetration rate above 100%. The increase in the value of R2
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-10A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-10A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-10A1.txt
  • Appx. 1 (D.C. Cir. 2003) (per curiam). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.106(b)(1). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.102(b)(3). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.106(n). We reject A-O's claim that the staff was without authority to order A-O to cease broadcasting without either convening a hearing under 47 C.F.R. � 1.91 or determining that a hearing was waived pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.92. Where the facts demonstrate that a station has failed to transmit broadcast signals for a consecutive 12-month period, Section 312(g) results in automatic cancellation, without requirement of a hearing. See 47 U.S.C. � 307(c); 5 U.S.C. � 558(c); 47 C.F.R. � 1.62. See Miami MDS Co., 14 F.3d 658 (D.C. Cir. 1994); Commission for Open Media v. FCC, 543 F.2d
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-129A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-129A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-129A1.txt
  • $30,125 $42,435 13.9 1.55 3.98 94.0 U.S. Virgin Islands 3 108.6 40.6 36,204 13,549 $14,647 $26,925 NA NA 315.37 831.58 1 7.2 Nebraska 33 108.5 43.4 3,289 1,316 $15,094 $29,650 $37,598 13.5 2.04 5.1 4 96.3 Illinois 6 107.5 41.6 17,916 6,934 $17,767 $36,164 $43,527 15.1 14.77 38 .30 60.7 Wyoming 5 106.4 42.4 21,277 8,486 $17,760 $35,259 $54,543 8.3 1.92 4.84 74.4 Colorado 19 100.5 38.1 5,289 2,007 $16,830 $31,610 $39,726 17.7 2.17 5.5 5 88.4 Nevada 10 98.9 38.2 9,894 3,822 $18,492 $39,158 $50,779 12.7 1.07 2.61 7 1.1 Arizona 2 90.3 28.7 45,147 14,354 $11,951 $24,592 $32,351 29.7 1.85 5.36 72.3 Idaho 11 75.4 27.2 6,853 2,471 $15,014 $32,460 $42,417 13.3 2.04 5.79 88 .8 Northern Mariana Islands
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-147A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-147A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-147A1.txt
  • Muskegon Broadcasters, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 15464, 15472-73, �� 22-23 (1996). 47 U.S.C. �� 312(a) and (c). 47 C.F.R. � 1.91(a). 47 U.S.C. � 309(e), (k). 47 U.S.C. � 312(d). 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(1). 47 C.F.R. � 1.17. 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(3). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.91, 1.221. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.221(c). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.92(a)(1). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.92(c). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 10-147 Federal Communications Commission FCC 10-147 � � � � � � \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0 0
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98076.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98076.wp
  • 413; see also supra para. 7 & note 24 (citing Section 413 of the Act). 31 See Show Cause Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 8554-56, paras. 10-12. 32 The failure of a principal, principals, or other legal representative to file a notice of appearance or to appear at the hearing waives their right to a hearing. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.92 (stating in pertinent part, "[a]fter issuance of an order to show cause . . . calling upon a person to appear at a hearing before the Commission, the (1) fail[ure] to file a timely written appearance as prescribed in � 1.91(c) indicating that he will appear at a hearing and present evidence on the matters specified in the order" constitutes
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fc01269a.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fc01269a.pdf
  • or changes in the retail analog applied, making it difficult to compare the data over time. AGGREGATE METRICS DISAGGREGATED METRICS 0.00 0.00 10.00 16.67 12.50 0.00 0.00 1b,2b,3b,4a,5a Interconnection Trunk Blockage NP-1-01-5120 % FTG Exceeding Blocking Standard - Common Final Trunks 4.21 4.19 3.27 0.84 0.42 NP-1-01-5400 % FTG Exceeding Blocking Standard - Dedicated Final Trunks 4.90 4.08 2.88 0.00 1.92 NP-1-02-5120 % FTG Exceeding Blocking Standard (No Exceptions) - Common Final Trunks 4.21 4.19 3.27 0.84 0.42 NP-1-02-5400 % FTG Exceeding Blocking Standard (No Exceptions) - Dedicated Final Trunks 4.90 5.44 4.32 0.68 3.85 NP-1-03-5400 Number Dedicated FTG Exceeding Blocking Standard - 2 Months 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 NP-1-04-5400 Number Dedicated FTG Exceeding Blocking Standard - 3 Months 0.00
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
  • Completed � Total No Dispatch 0.71 0 0.57 0.43 a,b PR-2-03-2120 Average Interval Completed � Dispatch (1-5 Lines) 4.49 NA 4.55 11 b POTS & Complex Aggregate PR-2 - Average Completed Interval PR-2-18-2103 Average Interval Completed � Disconnects 2.92 2.19 2.72 3.37 2-Wire Digital Services PR-2 - Average Completed Interval PR-2-01-2341 Average Interval Completed � Total No Dispatch 1.63 2.67 1.92 1.36 a PR-2-02-2341 Average Interval Completed � Total Dispatch 5 NA 5.8 4 b PR-4 - Missed Appointments PR-4-02-2341 Average Delay Days � Total 3.67 NA 6 NA NA NA 30 NA 2 NA PR-4-03-2341 % Missed Appointment � Customer 4.44 0 20.88 0 26.79 11.11 5.88 0 PR-4-04-2341 % Missed Appointment � Verizon � Dispatch 5 NA 1.69 0
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011489.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011489.html
  • a written notice of appearance in order to avail himself of the opportunity to be heard. The OSC explained that if Mr. Brewer failed to file a timely written notice of appearance, his right to a hearing on the matter of his captioned station licenses would be deemed waived, and the proceeding thereafter would be conducted in accordance with Section 1.92 of the Commission's rules. By Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 01M-11, released May 4, 2001, the Presiding Judge determined that Mr. Brewer had received a copy of the OSC, but failed to file a written (or any other) notice of appearance seeking to avail himself of the opportunity to be heard. Accordingly, the Presiding Judge concluded that the hearing was
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da012152.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da012152.html
  • Two-Way Radio, Inc. K. Lawson Pedigo, Esq. Ronnie Wilson, Esq. Fulbright & Jaworski, L.L.P. 100 North Central Expressway, Suite 1211 2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 2800 Richardson, Texas, 75080 Dallas, Texas, 75201 Counsel for David and Diane Brasher David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau Letter from Carolyn S. Lutz to the FCC dated September 29, 2000; Joint Statement Pursuant to Section 1.92 of the Rules filed by Jim Sumpter, Norma Sumpter, Melissa Sumpter and Jennifer Hill on October 6, 2000. We note that Melissa Sumpter recently married, but her license for station WPJS437 is in her maiden name. Federal Communications Commission DA 01-2152 L M � O P F [ \ � � � � ... � � " � � �
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01044.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01044.html
  • or by its attorney, shall file within 30 days of the release of this Order, a written appearance stating that it will appear at the hearing and present evidence on matters specified in this Order. If the licensee fails to file a timely written notice of appearance, the right to a hearing shall be deemed to be waived. See Section 1.92(a) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.92(a). Where a hearing is waived, the licensee may submit a written, signed statement of mitigation or justification within 30 days of the release of this Order. See Section 1.92(b) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.92(b). In the event the right to a hearing is waived, the Chief Administrative Law Judge (or presiding
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01074.html
  • appear at the hearing and present evidence on issues specified in 17, above. If Leslie D. Brewer fails to file a timely written notice of appearance, his right to a hearing on the matter of his captioned Amateur radio station and GMRS licenses shall be deemed to be waived, and the proceeding thereafter shall be conducted in accordance with Section 1.92 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.92. 22. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that Leslie D. Brewer may file his written request for a hearing on the matter of his captioned Amateur radio operator license in a consolidated filing with his written notice of appearance on the matter of his captioned Amateur radio station and GMRS licenses. 23. IT IS FURTHER
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-319A1.html
  • days of its receipt of this ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY FOR HEARING, file with the Commission a written appearance stating that it will appear at the hearing and present evidence on the issues specified above. An unexcused failure to each file a timely notice of appearance will constitute a waiver of such hearing, pursuant to Section 1.92(a)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.92(a)(1). 18. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT, if the hearing is waived, RMI may submit written signed statements pursuant to Section 1.92(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.92(b), which can deny, seek to mitigate, or justify its conduct with respect to Station WMGA(AM). In the event that RMI waives its right to a
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-32A1.html
  • rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.91(c), SHALL, within thirty days of its receipt of this ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, FILE with the Commission a written appearance stating that it will appear at the hearing and present evidence on the issues specified above. An unexcused failure to file a timely notice of appearance will constitute a waiver of such hearing, pursuant to section 1.92(a)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.92(a)(1). If the hearing is waived, Peninsula Communications, Inc. may submit a written signed statement pursuant to section 1.92(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.92(b), which can deny, seek to mitigate or justify its unauthorized operation of the seven noted translators. In the event Peninsula Communications, Inc. waives its right to a hearing,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-3513A1.html
  • a written notice of appearance in order to avail itself of the opportunity to be heard.10 The OSC admonished RMI that, if it failed to so file a written notice of appearance, its right to a hearing on the matter of its captioned broadcast license would be deemed waived, and the proceeding thereafter would be resolved in accordance with Section 1.92 (c) of the Commission's rules.11 5. The Presiding Judge determined that RMI had received a copy of the OSC but had failed to file a written (or any other) notice of appearance seeking to avail itself of the opportunity to be heard.12 Accordingly, the Presiding Judge concluded that RMI had waived its right to a hearing, and he terminated the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-1068A1.html
  • would appear on the date fixed for the hearing and present evidence on the specified issues.5 The OSC informed Mr. Scaggs that, if he failed to so file a written notice of appearance, his right to a hearing on the matter of his amateur license would be deemed waived, and the proceeding would be resolved thereafter in accordance with section 1.92(c) of the Commission's rules.6 4. The Presiding Judge determined that Mr. Scaggs had received a copy of the OSC but had failed to file a written notice of appearance seeking to avail himself of the opportunity to be heard.7 Accordingly, the Presiding Judge concluded that Mr. Scaggs had waived his right to a hearing, and the Presiding Judge terminated the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-1704A1.html
  • received a copy of the OSC but had failed to file a written notice of appearance seeking to avail itself of the opportunity to be heard.7 Accordingly, the Presiding Judge concluded that J Communications had waived its right to a hearing, and he terminated the proceeding and certified the case to the Commission for disposition in accordance with 47 C.F.R. 1.92(c). The Commission has delegated authority to the Enforcement Bureau for such revocation proceedings, terminated on the basis of waiver, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. 0.111(a)(17). III. DISCUSSION A. Facts 5. The GMRS is a short-distance, two-way land mobile radio service available for communications that facilitate personal or business activities of licensees and their immediate family members.8 Section 95.631(a) of the rules9
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1014A1.html
  • Tung Shih had received a copy of the OSC but had failed to file a written notice of appearance seeking to avail itself of the opportunity to be heard.7 Accordingly, he concluded that Tung Shih had waived its right to a hearing, and terminated the proceeding and certified the case to the Commission for disposition in accordance with 47 C.F.R. 1.92(c). The Commission has delegated authority to the Enforcement Bureau for such revocation proceedings, terminated on the basis of waiver, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. 0.111(a)(17). III. DISCUSSION A. Facts 5. Learned mode transmitters are typically sold as universal replacements or duplicates for garage door openers, keyless entry systems, security alarms, remote switches and similar types of radio controlled devices. These transmitters
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1889A1.html
  • File No. BPED-19990907MG Station in Daingerfield, Texas ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: July 6, 2005 Released: July 7, 2005 By the Acting Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. By this Memorandum Opinion And Order, acting pursuant to authority delegated to the Enforcement Bureau under section 0.111(a)(17) of the Commission's rules,1 we dismiss the above- captioned proceeding pursuant to section 1.92(d) of the Commission's rules.2 We conclude, based on the evidence described herein that KEGG Communications, Inc. (``KCI'') surrendered the license for FM translator Station K216EQ, Daingerfield, Texas and that the Media Bureau canceled that authorization.3 We further note that the presiding Administrative Law Judge (``Presiding Judge'') dismissed with prejudice KCI's captioned application for a construction permit for a new noncommercial
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-2015A1.html
  • this proceeding, David Edward Cox, in person or by his attorney, SHALL FILE with the Commission, within thirty (30) days of the release of this Order to Show Cause, a written appearance stating that he will appear on the date fixed for hearing and present evidence on the issues specified herein. 8. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.92(c) of the Commission's rules, if David Edward Cox fails to timely file a written appearance within the thirty (30)-day period, or has not filed a petition to accept, for good cause shown, a written appearance beyond the expiration of the thirty (30)-day period, the right to a hearing shall be deemed to be waived.15 Where a hearing is waived, the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-1570A1.html
  • this proceeding, Robert D. Landis, in person or by his attorney, SHALL FILE with the Commission, within thirty (30) days of the release of this Order to Show Cause, a written appearance stating that he will appear on the date fixed for hearing and present evidence on the issues specified herein. 8. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.92(c) of the Commission's rules, if Robert D. Landis fails to timely file a written appearance within the thirty (30)-day period, or has not filed a petition to accept, for good cause shown, a written appearance beyond the expiration of the thirty (30)-day period, the right to a hearing shall be deemed to be waived. Where a hearing is waived, the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-2463A1.html
  • would appear on the date fixed for the hearing and present evidence on the specified issues. The OSC informed Mr. Cox that, if he failed to so file a written notice of appearance, his right to a hearing on the matter of his amateur license would be deemed waived, and the proceeding would be resolved thereafter in accordance with Section 1.92(c) of the Commission's rules. 4. The Presiding Judge determined that Mr. Cox had received a copy of the OSC but had failed to file a written notice of appearance seeking to avail himself of the opportunity to be heard. Accordingly, the Presiding Judge concluded that Mr. Cox had waived his right to a hearing, and the Presiding Judge terminated the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-124A1.html
  • 1.80 of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 17087, 17100-01, P 27, 17112 Appendix A (1997), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999); see also 47 C.F.R. S 1.80(b). 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(3). 47 C.F.R. SS 1.91, S 1.221. See 47 C.F.R. S 1.21(b). See 47 C.F.R. S 1.221(c). See 47 C.F.R. S 1.92(a). See 47 C.F.R. S 1.92(b). See 47 C.F.R. S 1.92(c). 47 U.S.C. S 311(a)(2). 47 C.F.R. S 73.3594. 47 C.F.R. S 73.3594(g). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 06-124 7 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06-124 References Visible links 1. mailto:fccinfo@fcc.gov References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-124A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-124A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-128A1.html
  • M. Doty, in person or by their respective attorneys, SHALL FILE with the Commission, within 30 calendar days of the release of this Order to Show Cause, a written appearance in triplicate stating that they will appear on the date fixed for hearing and present evidence on the issues specified herein. 17. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 1.92(c) of the Commission's rules, if either CRS or Timothy M. Doty or both fails to timely file a written appearance as specified in paragraph 14, above, or has not filed a petition to accept, for good cause shown, a written appearance beyond the expiration of the 30-day period, the right to a hearing as to CRS and/or Mr. Doty SHALL
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-377A1.html
  • be heard, David L. Titus, in person or by his attorney, SHALL FILE with the Commission, within 30 calendar days of the release of this Order to Show Cause, a written appearance stating that he will appear on the date fixed for hearing and present evidence on the issues specified herein. 8. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 1.92(c) of the Commission's rules, if David L. Titus fails to timely file a written appearance within the 30-day period, or has not filed a petition to accept, for good cause shown, a written appearance beyond the expiration of the 30-day period, his right to a hearing shall be deemed by the Presiding Administrative Law Judge to be waived, and the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-4675A1.html
  • this proceeding, Lonnie L. Keeney, in person or by his attorney, SHALL FILE with the Commission, within thirty (30) days of the release of this Order to Show Cause, a written appearance stating that he will appear on the date fixed for hearing and present evidence on the issues specified herein. 9. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 1.92(c) of the Commission's rules, if Lonnie L. Keeney fails to timely file a written appearance within the thirty (30)-day period, or has not filed a petition to accept, for good cause shown, a written appearance beyond the expiration of the thirty (30)-day period, the right to a hearing shall be deemed to be waived. Where a hearing is waived, the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-4676A1.html
  • of appearance to state that Mr. Landis would appear on the hearing date and present evidence on the specified issues. In addition, the OSC informed Mr. Landis that, if he failed to so file a written notice of appearance, his right to a hearing would be deemed waived, and the hearing proceeding would be resolved thereafter in accordance with Section 1.92(c) of the Commission's rules. 4. The Presiding Judge determined that Mr. Landis had received a copy of the OSC but had failed to file a written notice of appearance seeking to avail himself of the right to a hearing. Mr. Landis sent separate letters to the Chief of the Enforcement Bureau and the Presiding Judge, stating that he could not
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-125A1.html
  • 503(b)(6). See Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section 1.80 of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 17087, 17100-01, P: 27, 17112 Appendix A (1997), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999); see also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.80(b). 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(3). 47 C.F.R. S:S: 1.91, S: 1.221. See 47 C.F.R. S: 1.92(a). See 47 C.F.R. S: 1.92(c). (Continued from previous page.) (Continued...) Federal Communications Commission FCC 07-125 25 Federal Communications Commission FCC 07-125 References 1. http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-125A1.pdf 2. http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-125A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-165A1.html
  • APPEARANCE stating that they will, individually and/or by legal representative, appear on the date fixed for hearing and present evidence on the issues specified herein. 26. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Chief, Enforcement Bureau, SHALL BE MADE a party to this proceeding without the need to file a notice of appearance. 27. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.92(c) of the Commission's rules, that if Buzz Telecom Corporation, Business Options, Inc., US Bell Corporation, Link Technologies, AVATAR, and/or their principals Kurtis J. Kintzel and/or Keanan Kintzel fail to timely file written appearances within the 20-day period referenced above, or have not filed a petition to accept, for good cause shown, a written appearance beyond the expiration of the 20-day
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1370A1.html
  • HAMMOND File No. EB-03-IH-0130 ) Application for Renewal of Licensee for File No. BRH-20050401AAA Station KBKH(FM), Shamrock, Texas ) Facility ID No. 81640 ) ) ) Memorandum opinion and ORDER Adopted: June 22, 2009 Released: June 22, 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. By this Memorandum Opinion and Order, we dismiss the above-captioned proceeding pursuant to Section 1.92(d) of the Commission's rules. Based upon the evidence of his felony conviction, we conclude that Terry Keith Hammond lacks the basic requisite character qualifications to be and remain a Commission licensee, and note that such conclusion would have warranted revocation of the license for Station KBKH(FM) (the "Station") prior to its cancellation. Our actions herein are taken pursuant to authority
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-916A1.html
  • file with the Commission within 30 days of release thereof, a written appearance stating his intention to appear on the date fixed for hearing and present evidence on the specified issues. The Order to Show Cause informed Mr. Keeney that if he failed to file a timely written appearance, his right to a hearing would be waived pursuant to Section 1.92(c) of the Commission's rules, and the Presiding Administrative Law Judge would thereafter issue an order terminating the hearing and certifying the case to the Commission for resolution. 4. The ALJ issued Lonnie L. Keeney, Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 08M-13 (ALJ, rel. January 25, 2008) ("MO&O"), holding that Mr. Keeney had failed to file a written appearance and that his
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-246A1.html
  • proceeding, Shenzhen, in person or by an attorney, SHALL FILE with the Commission, within thirty (30) days of the release of this Order to Show Cause, a written appearance stating that it will appear at the hearing and present evidence on the issues specified above. 22. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 312(c) of the Act and sections 1.92(c) and 2.939(b) of the Rules, if Shenzhen fails to file a timely notice of appearance within the thirty (30) day period, or has not filed a petition to accept, for good cause shown, a written appearance beyond the expiration of the thirty (30)-day period, its right to a hearing SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE WAIVED. In the event that Shenzhen
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/fcc00314.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/fcc00314.txt
  • their attorneys, shall each file, within 30 days after receipt of this Order, a written appearance stating that it will appear at the hearing and present evidence on matters specified in that Order. If any of the licensees fail to file a timely written notice of appearance, the right to a hearing shall be deemed to be waived. See Section 1.92(a) of the Commission's rules. Where a hearing is waived the licensee may submit a written, signed statement of mitigation or justification within 30 days of receipt of the Order to Show Cause. See Section 1.92(b) of the Commission's rules. In the event the right to a hearing is waived, the Chief Administrative Law Judge (or presiding officer if one has
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/materials/already-released/survivor090002.pdf
  • GDP Total Ad Volume Video Ad Volume Broadcast Ad Volume Cable Ad Volume Total Ad Volume as Percentage of GDP Total Video Ad Volume as Percentage of GDP Total Broadcast Ad Volume as Percentage of GDP Total Cable Ad Volume as Percentage of GDP 1975 1,635,200 27,900 5,263 5,263 0 1.71 0.32 0.32 0 1980 2,795,600 53,570 11,488 11,416 72 1.92 0.41 0.41 0.0026 1985 4,213,000 94,900 21,287 20,298 989 2.25 0.51 0.48 0.0235 1990 5,803,200 129,968 29,247 26,616 2,631 2.24 0.50 0.46 0.0453 1991 5,986,200 128,352 28,606 25,461 3,145 2.14 0.48 0.43 0.0525 1992 6,318,900 133,750 31,079 27,249 3,830 2.12 0.49 0.43 0.0606 1993 6,642,300 140,956 32,471 28,020 4,451 2.12 0.49 0.42 0.0670 1994 7,054,300 153,024 36,342 31,133 5,209 2.17
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-a.pdf
  • 0.02 0.34 0.54 0.79 1.57 Circulated Papers 7,397 2.92 1 1 2 4 7 MSA's Total Circulation 269 129,735 21,092 30,989 50,946 104,769 540,584 Circulation Per Capita 269 0.23 0.15 0.20 0.23 0.26 0.33 Circulation Per Household 269 .59 0.42 0.53 0.59 0.65 0.78 Circulated Papers 269 8.72 2 4 6 10 22 Paper Equivalents1 269 1.68 1.01 1.1 1.35 1.92 3.41 Newspaper Statistics2 (Burrelle's, Editor & Publisher) Newspaper Price 728 0.48 0.25 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 MSA Average Newspaper Price 234 0.49 0.35 0.48 0.50 0.50 0.57 Newspaper Pages 776 35 14 22 30 42 69 MSA Average Newspaper Pages 259 42 24 30 38 48 71 Newspaper Staff 830 17 4 8 11 16 51 MSA Average Newspaper Staff
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-b.pdf
  • Paper presented at 1997 Aspen Institute Forum, "Delivering on Diversity: New Approaches to Marketing Minority Programming." November 1997. 35 Table 1a: Summary Statistics, 1997 All MarketsMarkets with Black Data Markets with Hispanic Data Formats 14.80 16.31 16.84 Stations Total 24.48 26.65 29.33 Youth-Targeted 5.56 6.48 5.53 Middle-Age-Targeted 14.12 15.32 17.96 Older-Targeted 4.80 4.85 5.84 White-Targeted 22.55 22.62 27.96 Black (non-white)-Targeted 1.92 4.03 1.37 Hispanic-Targeted 1.07 0.78 4.65 Non-Hispanic Targeted 23.41 25.87 24.69 AQH Listening (%) Total 15.77 15.98 16.36 White (Non-Black) 15.44 Black 17.88 Non-Hispanic 15.80 Hispanic 17.50 Population (millions) Total 0.70 1.16 1.62 White (Non-Black) 0.63 0.97 Black 0.08 0.19 Non-Hispanic 1.28 Hispanic 0.07 0.11 0.33 Fraction Black 0.08 0.19 0.05 Fraction Black 0.05 0.03 0.25 Northeast 0.21 0.16 0.12
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=conference_agenda&y=2001
  • 10:30 Break 10:30 - 12:00 Tradeoffs in Combinatorial Auction Design Aleksandar Pekec and Michael Rothkopf [49]Tradeoffs in Combinatorial Auction Design (pdf) (130 KB) Discussant(s): Robert Forsythe, Dan Levin, Daniel Vincent 12:00 - 1:30 Lunch - Keynote speech David Sappington, Chief Economist FCC 1:30 - 2:00 FCC 700 MHz Auction Design and Software Craig Bomberger, FCC [50]Package Bidding System Screenshots (pdf) (1.92 MB) 2:00 - 3:00 Issues in Scaling Up the 700 MHz Auction Design Karla Hoffman, FCC [51]Issues in Scaling Up the 700 MHz Auction Design (pdf) (1.17 MB) 3:00 - 3:30 Discussion Discussant(s): Craig Bomberger, Karla Hoffman, Evan Kwerel, Walter Strack, Karen Wrege 3:30 - 4:00 Break 4:00 - 5:00 Market Clearing Technology for Markets with Expressive Bidding Tuomas Sandholm
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=conference_presentations&y=2001
  • [Select an Auction............][44] Go . [45]Summary | [46]Agenda | [47]Papers | Presentations October 26-28, 2001 Combinatorial Bidding Conference Presentations 10/27/2001 Ascending Auctions with Package Bidding Lawrence Ausubel and Paul Milgrom [48]pdf (140 KB) - Presentation Slides ([49]pdf) (155 KB) Tradeoffs in Combinatorial Auction Design Aleksandar Pekec and Michael Rothkopf [50]pdf (130 KB) Package Bidding System Screenshots Craig Bomberger, FCC [51]pdf (1.92 MB) Issues in Scaling Up the 700 MHz Auction Design Karla Hoffman, FCC [52]pdf (1.17 MB) 10/28/2001 Balanced Budget Mechanism Design for Combinatorial Exchanges David Parkes, Jayant Kalagnanam and Marta Eso Balanced Budget Mechanism Design for Combinatorial Exchanges ([53]pdf) (217 KB) - Complete Paper ([54]pdf) (425 KB) [55]Return to Top Arrow Return To Top Last reviewed/updated on 7/23/2004 [56]FCC Home
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/rss/index.htm?job=ainf&id=69
  • * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=69M on, 12 Feb 2007 17:35:08 GMT Summary Licenses: Auction 69 will offer 64 1.4 GHz bands licenses: 12 Economic Area Grouping ("EAG") licenses, and 52 Major Economic Area ("MEA") licenses. Qualified Bidders: 9 Rounds Completed: 20 Bidding Days: 4 Results for Round 20 Gross Revenue: $104,301,300.00 - Dollar Change: $1,968,000.00 - % Change: 1.92 Net Revenue: $101,296,425.00 - Dollar Change: ($688,125.00) - % Change: - 0.67 New Bids: 42 Withdrawn Bids: 0 Proactive Waivers: 0 Bidders that Reduced Eligibility: 2 Licenses with PWBs*: 64 FCC Held Licenses: 0 Eligible Bidders: 7 (of 9 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=69M on, 12 Feb 2007 18:50:07 GMT Summary Licenses: Auction 69 will offer
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Comments/access_reform/samples/MCICOM.htm
  • and the removal of $2.13 billion by raising the productivity factor to 15.2%. Revenue changes subsequent to 1996 are due solely to the higher productivity factor. Table III-2: Existing Price Cap Baskets v TELRIC Baskets Interstate Switched Access Revenues A B C Year Revenue ($Billion) Revenue Reduction ($Billion) Percent Change in PCI 1996 21.50 1997 16.57 4.93 22.93 1998 14.65 1.92 11.59 1999 12.91 1.74 11.88 2000 11.34 1.57 12.16 2001 9.92 1.42 12.52 Column "C" shows the annual change in the PCI required each year to bring existing price cap rates down to economic cost. Table III-2 shows the amount PCI's would have to be reduced each year in order bring the rates of each price cap service to the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98076.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98076.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98076.wp
  • 413; see also supra para. 7 & note 24 (citing Section 413 of the Act). 31 See Show Cause Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 8554-56, paras. 10-12. 32 The failure of a principal, principals, or other legal representative to file a notice of appearance or to appear at the hearing waives their right to a hearing. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.92 (stating in pertinent part, "[a]fter issuance of an order to show cause . . . calling upon a person to appear at a hearing before the Commission, the (1) fail[ure] to file a timely written appearance as prescribed in � 1.91(c) indicating that he will appear at a hearing and present evidence on the matters specified in the order" constitutes
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fc01269a.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fc01269a.pdf
  • or changes in the retail analog applied, making it difficult to compare the data over time. AGGREGATE METRICS DISAGGREGATED METRICS 0.00 0.00 10.00 16.67 12.50 0.00 0.00 1b,2b,3b,4a,5a Interconnection Trunk Blockage NP-1-01-5120 % FTG Exceeding Blocking Standard - Common Final Trunks 4.21 4.19 3.27 0.84 0.42 NP-1-01-5400 % FTG Exceeding Blocking Standard - Dedicated Final Trunks 4.90 4.08 2.88 0.00 1.92 NP-1-02-5120 % FTG Exceeding Blocking Standard (No Exceptions) - Common Final Trunks 4.21 4.19 3.27 0.84 0.42 NP-1-02-5400 % FTG Exceeding Blocking Standard (No Exceptions) - Dedicated Final Trunks 4.90 5.44 4.32 0.68 3.85 NP-1-03-5400 Number Dedicated FTG Exceeding Blocking Standard - 2 Months 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 NP-1-04-5400 Number Dedicated FTG Exceeding Blocking Standard - 3 Months 0.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2002/fcc02331.pdf
  • 1,2,3,4,5 B.2.21.8.1.12W Analog Loop Design/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (hours) 3.68 10.03 4.33 8.32 6.54 20.82 5.77 12.93 4.93 14.31 B.2.21.8.2.12W Analog Loop Design/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (hours) 8.15 0.02 13.65 0.02 8.63 21.33 9.59 46.23 4.07 71.48 1,2,3,4,5 B.2.21.9.1.12W Analog Loop Non-Design/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (hours) 3.63 0.51 4.30 1.51 6.53 0.41 5.64 0.23 4.91 0.06 B.2.21.9.1.42W Analog Loop Non-Design/<10 circuits/Dispatch In/FL (hours) 0.98 0.40 1.11 1.92 1.14 0.17 0.95 0.06 0.87 0.02 4,5 B.2.21.9.2.12W Analog Loop Non-Design/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (hours) 8.62 1.01 13.37 2.48 6.53 0.39 4.24 0.41 3.65 0.03 B.2.21.12.1.12W Analog Loop w/LNP Design/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (hours) 3.68 16.77 4.33 7.69 6.54 11.81 5.77 10.83 4.93 13.81 B - 37 Metric Metric Name [SQM Number] May June July August September Number and Disaggregation BST CLEC BST CLEC
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • &T WorldCom Sprint AT &T WorldCom Sprint AT &T WorldCom Sprint AT &T WorldCom Sprint AT &T WorldCom Sprint 1980 $0.40 $0.56 $0.94 $1.26 $0.71 $0.92 $1.46 $0.77 $1.00 $1.49 $0.84 $1.08 $1.50 $0.97 $1.16 $1.58 $1.08 $1.28 $1.66 $1.15 $1.32 1981 0.45 0.65 1.10 1.46 1.01 1.07 1.62 1.12 1.16 1.74 1.21 1.25 1.75 1.21 1.35 1.84 1.27 1.48 1.92 1.33 1.53 1982 0.70 $0.51 $0.36 0.95 $0.69 $0.50 1.20 $0.87 $0.80 1.56 1.14 1.00 1.63 1.20 1.19 1.74 1.28 1.20 1.79 1.31 1.27 1.84 1.35 1.29 2.06 1.50 1.31 1983 0.70 0.61 0.59 0.95 0.84 0.79 1.20 1.08 0.99 1.56 1.25 1.20 1.63 1.32 1.30 1.74 1.41 1.33 1.67 1.45 1.40 1.84 1.48 1.48 2.06 1.66 1.56 1984 0.66
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 2.95 3.00 2.40 2.95 3.00 2.40 2.95 3.00 2.40 2.95 3.00 2.40 2.95 3.00 2.40 2.95 3.00 2.40 90-Mile Call AT&TWorldComSprintAT&TWorldComSprintAT&TWorldComSprintAT&TWorldComSprintAT&TWorldComSprintAT&TWorldComSprintAT&TWorldComSprintAT&TWorldComSprintAT&TWorldComSprint 1980$0.40 $0.56 $0.94 $1.26 $0.71 $0.92 $1.46 $0.77 $1.00 $1.49 $0.84 $1.08 $1.50 $0.97 $1.16 $1.58 $1.08 $1.28 $1.66 $1.15 $1.32 19810.45 0.65 1.10 1.46 1.01 1.07 1.62 1.12 1.16 1.74 1.21 1.25 1.75 1.21 1.35 1.84 1.27 1.48 1.92 1.33 1.53 19820.70 $0.51 $0.36 0.95 $0.69 $0.50 1.20 $0.87 $0.80 1.56 1.14 1.00 1.63 1.20 1.19 1.74 1.28 1.20 1.79 1.31 1.27 1.84 1.35 1.29 2.06 1.50 1.31 19830.70 0.61 0.59 0.95 0.84 0.79 1.20 1.08 0.99 1.56 1.25 1.20 1.63 1.32 1.30 1.74 1.41 1.33 1.67 1.45 1.40 1.84 1.48 1.48 2.06 1.66 1.56 19840.66 0.60 0.64 0.90
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 858 862 822 2000 877 889 790 856 884 891 864 2001 914 927 825 897 914 924 914 2002 957 972 851 952 934 987 936 1980 1.94% 1.94% 1.95% 1.89% 2.09% 1.78% 1981 2.05 2.05 2.10 2.04 2.14 1.90 1982 2.08 2.08 2.07 2.01 2.09 2.16 1983 2.11 2.11 2.15 2.01 2.28 1.95 1984 1.98 1.98 1.97% 2.01 1.92 2.06 1.89 1985 1.94 1.93 1.98 2.01 1.85 1.97 1.93 1986 1.97 1.95 2.16 1.89 1.96 2.12 1.87 1987 2.04 2.01 2.32 2.02 2.02 2.17 1.95 1988 2.07 2.04 2.31 1.99 2.01 2.21 2.03 1989 2.04 2.02 2.19 2.02 2.04 2.18 1.87 1990 2.09 2.07 2.24 2.08 2.11 2.28 1.88 1991 2.09 2.04 2.42 2.01 2.15 2.20 1.95 1992 2.09
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 884 891 864 2001 914 927 825 897 914 924 914 2002 957 972 851 952 934 987 936 2003 956 967 875 932 917 1,002 941 1980 1.94% 1.94% 1.95% 1.89% 2.09% 1.78% 1981 2.05 2.05 2.10 2.04 2.14 1.90 1982 2.08 2.08 2.07 2.01 2.09 2.16 1983 2.11 2.11 2.15 2.01 2.28 1.95 1984 1.98 1.98 1.97% 2.01 1.92 2.06 1.89 1985 1.94 1.93 1.98 2.01 1.85 1.97 1.93 1986 1.97 1.95 2.16 1.89 1.96 2.12 1.87 1987 2.04 2.01 2.32 2.02 2.02 2.17 1.95 1988 2.07 2.04 2.31 1.99 2.01 2.21 2.03 1989 2.04 2.02 2.19 2.02 2.04 2.18 1.87 1990 2.09 2.07 2.24 2.08 2.11 2.28 1.88 1991 2.09 2.04 2.42 2.01 2.15 2.20 1.95 1992 2.09
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • 1.38 3.562.311.42 3.76 2.44 1.50 3.96 2.57 1.58 September 13, 19771.000.650.40 1.310.850.52 2.241.450.89 3.041.971.21 3.342.17 1.33 3.542.30 1.41 3.562.311.42 3.76 2.44 1.50 3.96 2.57 1.58 June 6, 1980 1.010.650.40 1.410.910.56 2.351.520.94 3.152.041.26 3.542.30 1.41 3.742.43 1.49 3.772.451.50 3.97 2.58 1.58 4.17 2.71 1.66 June 28, 1981 1.130.730.45 1.631.050.65 2.771.801.10 3.672.381.46 4.072.64 1.62 4.362.83 1.74 4.392.851.75 4.60 2.98 1.84 4.80 3.11 1.92 April 2, 1982 1.761.050.70 2.381.420.95 3.001.801.20 3.902.331.56 4.092.45 1.63 4.372.62 1.74 4.492.691.79 4.60 2.76 1.84 5.15 3.09 2.06 May 25, 1984 1.650.990.66 2.271.360.90 2.791.671.11 3.692.211.47 3.872.32 1.54 4.062.43 1.62 4.182.501.67 4.29 2.57 1.71 4.83 2.89 1.93 April 26, 1985 2.091.250.83 2.711.621.08 3.211.921.28 3.692.211.47 3.872.32 1.54 4.062.43 1.62 4.182.501.67 4.29 2.57 1.71 4.83 2.89 1.93 June 1, 1985 1.981.180.79 2.591.551.03 3.001.801.20
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 1.38 3.562.311.42 3.76 2.44 1.50 3.96 2.57 1.58 September 13, 19771.000.650.40 1.310.850.52 2.241.450.89 3.041.971.21 3.342.17 1.33 3.542.30 1.41 3.562.311.42 3.76 2.44 1.50 3.96 2.57 1.58 June 6, 1980 1.010.650.40 1.410.910.56 2.351.520.94 3.152.041.26 3.542.30 1.41 3.742.43 1.49 3.772.451.50 3.97 2.58 1.58 4.17 2.71 1.66 June 28, 1981 1.130.730.45 1.631.050.65 2.771.801.10 3.672.381.46 4.072.64 1.62 4.362.83 1.74 4.392.851.75 4.60 2.98 1.84 4.80 3.11 1.92 April 2, 1982 1.761.050.70 2.381.420.95 3.001.801.20 3.902.331.56 4.092.45 1.63 4.372.62 1.74 4.492.691.79 4.60 2.76 1.84 5.15 3.09 2.06 May 25, 1984 1.650.990.66 2.271.360.90 2.791.671.11 3.692.211.47 3.872.32 1.54 4.062.43 1.62 4.182.501.67 4.29 2.57 1.71 4.83 2.89 1.93 April 26, 1985 2.091.250.83 2.711.621.08 3.211.921.28 3.692.211.47 3.872.32 1.54 4.062.43 1.62 4.182.501.67 4.29 2.57 1.71 4.83 2.89 1.93 June 1, 1985 1.981.180.79 2.591.551.03 3.001.801.20
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-95.pdf
  • 416 NEW YORK 32,384,838 33,447,032 7.57 4,426 NORTH CAROLINA 10,070,261 12,045,152 2.73 1,594 NORTH DAKOTA 875,016 1,235,922 0.28 164 OHIO 13,480,471 15,567,188 3.52 2,060 OKLAHOMA 4,359,667 4,914,223 1.11 650 OREGON 5,177,768 5,638,096 1.28 746 PENNSYLVANIA 17,944,134 18,928,898 4.28 2,505 RHODE ISLAND 2,022,014 2,022,014 0.46 268 SOUTH CAROLINA 4,566,990 6,110,433 1.38 809 SOUTH DAKOTA 1,044,889 1,343,495 0.30 178 TENNESSEE 7,463,760 8,503,943 1.92 1,125 TEXAS 23,096,614 24,601,672 5.57 3,255 UTAH 3,019,822 3,160,149 0.72 418 VERMONT 1,190,287 1,412,509 0.32 187 VIRGINIA 12,509,981 12,846,775 2.91 1,700 WASHINGTON 8,828,059 9,687,267 2.19 1,282 WEST VIRGINIA 2,180,871 2,611,302 0.59 346 WISCONSIN 5,567,930 6,838,058 1.55 905 WYOMING 939,912 1,131,812 0.26 150 Total 403,911,702 441,954,084 100.00 $58,482 -18 Table 12 Intrastate Billed Revenue Local Exchange Wireless Intrastate Access Intralata Toll
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-99.pdf
  • NA 4.06 1,589 186 1,764 199 Oklahoma 826,637 NA 1.04 406 47 450 51 Oregon 914,848 NA 1.15 449 52 498 56 Pennsylvania 2,767,474 NA 3.47 1,358 159 1,508 170 Rhode Island 279,304 NA 0.35 137 16 152 17 South Carolina 1,137,232 NA 1.43 558 65 620 70 South Dakota * 16,300 0.28 108 13 120 14 Tennessee 1,529,054 NA 1.92 750 88 833 94 Texas 5,792,453 NA 7.27 2,843 332 3,156 356 Utah 643,824 NA 0.81 316 37 351 40 Vermont * 14,300 0.24 95 11 106 12 Virginia 1,860,262 NA 2.33 913 107 1,013 114 Washington 1,873,475 NA 2.35 919 107 1,021 115 West Virginia 241,265 NA 0.30 118 14 131 15 Wisconsin 1,525,818 NA 1.91 749 87 831
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend100.pdf
  • 3.16 4.16 1936 0.25 0.35 13.9 2.95 4.10 1937 0.22 0.35 14.4 2.45 3.96 1938 0.21 0.26 14.1 2.48 2.95 1939 0.22 0.26 13.9 2.53 2.99 1940 0.21 0.26 14.0 2.45 2.97 1941 0.21 0.26 14.7 2.30 2.83 1942 0.22 0.26 16.3 2.16 2.55 1943 0.21 0.22 17.3 1.98 2.07 1944 0.22 0.22 17.6 1.99 2.04 1945 0.21 0.22 18.0 1.92 1.99 1946 0.20 0.22 19.5 1.65 1.84 1947 0.19 0.22 22.3 1.40 1.61 1948 0.19 0.22 24.1 1.26 1.49 1949 0.19 0.22 23.8 1.29 1.51 1950 0.19 0.22 24.1 1.31 1.49 1951 0.20 0.22 26.0 1.26 1.38 1952 0.20 0.22 26.5 1.24 1.35 1953 0.21 0.22 26.7 1.27 1.34 1954 0.22 0.22 26.9 1.35 1.33 1955 0.23 0.22 26.8 1.40
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend299.pdf
  • 3.16 4.16 1936 25 35 13.9 2.95 4.10 1937 22 35 14.4 2.45 3.96 1938 21 26 14.1 2.48 2.95 1939 22 26 13.9 2.53 2.99 1940 21 26 14.0 2.45 2.97 1941 21 26 14.7 2.30 2.83 1942 22 26 16.3 2.16 2.55 1943 21 22 17.3 1.98 2.07 1944 22 22 17.6 1.99 2.04 1945 21 22 18.0 1.92 1.99 1946 20 22 19.5 1.65 1.84 1947 19 22 22.3 1.40 1.61 1948 19 22 24.1 1.26 1.49 1949 19 22 23.8 1.29 1.51 1950 19 22 24.1 1.31 1.49 1951 20 22 26.0 1.26 1.38 1952 20 22 26.5 1.24 1.35 1953 21 22 26.7 1.27 1.34 1954 22 22 26.9 1.35 1.33 1955 23 22 26.8 1.40
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd00.pdf
  • 1.35 1.20 1.36 1.33 1.23 1.35 1.19 1.27 0.84 0.73 Netherlands 1.14 1.07 1.06 1.03 1.02 0.86 0.78 0.57 0.50 0.40 0.44 Nigeria 0.96 1.09 1.06 1.14 1.17 1.09 1.08 0.86 0.79 0.68 0.67 Pakistan 1.79 1.76 1.80 1.77 1.70 1.56 1.53 1.24 1.12 0.99 0.74 Peru 1.11 1.12 1.15 1.14 1.07 1.03 1.03 0.87 0.87 0.80 0.67 Philippines 1.48 1.92 1.52 1.52 1.41 1.29 1.29 1.08 0.96 0.76 0.62 Poland 1.02 1.07 1.07 1.10 1.06 0.90 0.85 0.73 0.76 0.57 0.41 Russia 16/ 2.11 2.03 1.97 1.99 1.94 1.82 1.57 1.28 1.17 0.69 0.62 Saudi Arabia 1.22 1.34 1.37 1.34 1.41 1.25 1.20 1.05 1.08 1.00 0.88 Sierra Leone 2.49 2.11 1.93 1.93 1.94 1.78 1.80 1.22 1.07 0.47 0.75
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd01.pdf
  • Table 18 Average U.S. Billed Revenue per Minute for International Telephone Service By Region of the World Average Revenue per Minute 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 200210 Year Decline Africa $1.48 $1.38 $1.34 $1.29 $1.08 $1.01 $0.81 $0.71 $0.57 $0.40 $0.29 -80% Antarctica and Maritime 10.15 10.25 8.37 4.37 6.97 3.80 1.67 3.61 3.83 3.73 1.92 -81 Asia 1.54 1.45 1.25 1.17 0.92 0.82 0.71 0.64 0.55 0.38 0.31 -80 Caribbean 0.98 1.02 0.96 0.97 0.84 0.75 0.66 0.48 0.44 0.32 0.25 -74 Eastern Europe 1.37 1.40 1.30 1.21 1.02 1.02 0.70 0.55 0.51 0.32 0.22 -84 Middle East 1.37 1.36 1.22 1.23 1.06 1.08 0.91 0.71 0.64 0.47 0.33 -76 North and Central America 0.65
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-1.pdf
  • 4.27 2,224 2,890 Indiana 10,406,774 1.94 1,008 1,309 Iowa 5,156,864 0.96 499 649 Kansas 5,304,145 0.99 514 667 Kentucky 6,370,439 1.19 617 802 Louisiana 7,203,322 1.34 698 906 Maine 2,714,618 0.51 263 342 Maryland 13,227,683 2.46 1,281 1,664 Massachusetts 14,068,906 2.62 1,363 1,770 Michigan 14,516,983 2.70 1,406 1,827 Minnesota 9,045,195 1.68 876 1,138 Mississippi 4,660,870 0.87 451 586 Missouri 10,310,053 1.92 998 1,297 Montana 2,075,948 0.39 201 261 Nebraska 3,136,139 0.58 304 395 Nevada 5,962,293 1.11 577 750 New Hampshire 3,587,862 0.67 347 451 New Jersey 24,248,836 4.51 2,348 3,051 New Mexico 3,869,040 0.72 375 487 New York 33,258,503 6.19 3,221 4,185 North Carolina 15,964,159 2.97 1,546 2,009 North Dakota 1,297,853 0.24 126 163 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-2.pdf
  • 0.00 0.01 1.57 Texas 3.33 0.01 0.10 0.00 0.01 3.46 Utah 1.79 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.02 1.83 Vermont 7.50 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.01 7.58 Virgin Islands 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Virginia 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.43 Washington 2.47 0.01 0.19 0.00 0.03 2.70 West Virginia 0.45 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.46 Wisconsin 1.75 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.00 1.92 Wyoming 0.66 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.88 Industry Total $3.35 $0.09 $0.16 $0.00 $0.02 $3.63 Note: These dollars represent submitted claims to USAC for the time period January 2002 through December 2002, including true-ups reported to date. Loops are as of year-end 2001. Source: Universal Service Administration Company (USAC). Table 2.13 Low-Income Support Payments per Loop by State or Jurisdiction
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • EXCHANGE, INC.-ARIZONA 36.02 3.25 31.73 51.68 452302 C VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC. - AZ -11.83 2.18 -13.72 -44.99 453334 C TABLE TOP TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. 16.77 2.23 14.23 29.78 454426 C CITIZENS TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO OF WHITE MTNS 11.38 1.52 9.71 19.27 454449 C NAVAJO COMMUNICATIONS CO INC-AZ 7.11 8.92 -1.65 -0.93 455101 C QWEST CORPORATION - AZ (+ 457991A SADDLEBACK) 2.43 -1.92 4.43 0.00 457991 C SADDLEBACK COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY Previously unserved territory 457991A C SADDLEBACK COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY (QWEST) Exchanges acquired from 455101 QWEST CORP-AZ TOTAL: ARKANSAS 5.08 -2.49 7.76 18.30 401142 C CENTURYTEL OF NW ARKANSAS, LLC - RUSSELLVILLE 22.50 -1.42 24.26 216.96 401143 C CENTURYTEL OF NW ARKANSAS, LLC-SILOAM SPRINGS 33.26 -1.55 35.36 INFINITE 401144 C CENTURYTEL OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS, LLC
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 672 38 Kentucky 893 1.39 877 5 994 57 Louisiana 1,218 1.90 1,196 7 1,356 78 Maine 311 0.48 306 2 346 20 Maryland 1,316 2.05 1,293 8 1,465 84 Massachusetts 1,273 1.98 1,250 7 1,417 81 Michigan 1,870 2.91 1,837 11 2,082 119 Minnesota 1,038 1.62 1,019 6 1,155 66 Mississippi 868 1.35 853 5 967 55 Missouri 1,233 1.92 1,211 7 1,373 79 Montana 206 0.32 202 1 229 13 Nebraska 445 0.69 437 3 495 28 Nevada 412 0.64 404 2 458 26 New Hampshire 238 0.37 233 1 264 15 New Jersey 1,700 2.65 1,670 10 1,893 108 New Mexico 353 0.55 346 2 393 22 New York 5,081 7.91 4,990 30 5,656 324 North Carolina 1,978
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • 0.00 0.27 0.20 0.23 0.22 1.41 Texas 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.10 0.27 0.13 1.36 Utah 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.42 0.18 0.43 1.69 Vermont 1.09 0.00 1.99 0.50 0.77 0.39 0.96 5.69 Virgin Islands 17.28 0.00 0.00 9.20 9.79 0.00 0.00 36.27 Virginia 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.06 1.07 0.11 1.39 Washington 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.11 0.58 0.18 1.92 West Virginia 1.83 0.00 2.61 0.09 0.10 1.59 0.36 6.58 Wisconsin 0.61 0.02 0.00 0.33 0.64 0.01 0.60 2.21 Wyoming 4.22 0.02 2.94 1.46 0.86 2.07 1.65 13.22 Industry $0.50 $0.00 $0.11 $0.23 $0.18 $0.29 $0.20 $1.52 Based on 2003 support payments and year-end 2002 loops. Loop Model Support Table 3.15 Monthly Support per Loop for High-Cost Support Mechanisms: 2003
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-7.pdf
  • 3.16 4.16 1936 25 35 13.9 2.95 4.10 1937 22 35 14.4 2.45 3.96 1938 21 26 14.1 2.48 2.95 1939 22 26 13.9 2.53 2.99 1940 21 26 14.0 2.45 2.97 1941 21 26 14.7 2.30 2.83 1942 22 26 16.3 2.16 2.55 1943 21 22 17.3 1.98 2.07 1944 22 22 17.6 1.99 2.04 1945 21 22 18.0 1.92 1.99 1946 20 22 19.5 1.65 1.84 1947 19 22 22.3 1.40 1.61 1948 19 22 24.1 1.26 1.49 1949 19 22 23.8 1.29 1.51 1950 19 22 24.1 1.31 1.49 1951 20 22 26.0 1.26 1.38 1952 20 22 26.5 1.24 1.35 1953 21 22 26.7 1.27 1.34 1954 22 22 26.9 1.35 1.33 1955 23 22 26.8 1.40
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • 4.34 0.00 District of Columbia 5.38 -0.81 6.24 0.00 Florida 4.26 3.20 1.03 22.50 Georgia 5.25 4.07 1.13 5.03 Guam -2.42 3.41 -5.63 -91.10 Hawaii -3.13 0.63 -3.73 86.10 Idaho -1.32 3.74 -4.88 -6.99 Illinois 1.02 1.49 -0.46 21.79 Indiana -0.19 2.57 -2.69 -13.42 Iowa -1.21 2.22 -3.36 49.61 Kansas 6.39 4.21 2.09 20.31 Kentucky 1.34 2.71 -1.33 -41.18 Louisiana 1.92 2.23 -0.30 0.21 Maine -3.32 4.48 -7.46 6.52 Maryland 0.83 5.64 -4.55 0.00 Massachusetts 8.46 1.61 6.75 -10.77 Michigan 3.95 1.84 2.08 -3.06 Minnesota 1.90 2.58 -0.66 9.69 Mississippi 3.55 3.69 -0.14 6.92 Missouri 4.13 5.09 -0.91 -2.98 Montana -0.76 2.80 -3.46 3.12 Nebraska 1.49 -0.81 2.32 17.04 Nevada 8.00 3.14 4.72 35.23 New Hampshire -1.37 3.71 -4.90 -34.69 New
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • 0 384 0.43 318 0.36 66 0.07 Hawaii 1,277 0 1,277 0.15 3,858 0.44 -2,580 -0.30 Idaho 18,772 0 18,772 2.03 4,973 0.54 13,799 1.49 Illinois 8,157 0 8,157 0.08 42,635 0.43 -34,478 -0.35 Indiana 4,366 0 4,366 0.10 17,843 0.40 -13,477 -0.30 Iowa 5,684 0 5,684 0.27 8,559 0.41 -2,876 -0.14 Kansas 48,929 0 48,929 2.35 9,098 0.44 39,830 1.92 Kentucky 8,032 0 8,032 0.30 11,903 0.45 -3,870 -0.14 Louisiana 44,796 0 44,796 1.43 12,708 0.41 32,089 1.02 Maine 7,748 0 7,748 0.74 4,522 0.43 3,226 0.31 Maryland 0 0 0 0.00 21,781 0.46 -21,781 -0.46 Massachusetts 50 0 50 0.00 26,427 0.49 -26,377 -0.49 Michigan 22,805 0 22,805 0.29 27,361 0.35 -4,556 -0.06 Minnesota 17,720 0 17,720 0.46 16,892
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/QualSvc/qual01.pdf
  • 291.1 For Unscheduled Events Over 2 Minutes 89.2 132.0 36.7 1.9 332.9 2608.9 28.9 87.0 180.8 For Unscheduled Downtime More Than 2 Minutes Number of Occurrences or Events 58 79 37 6 14 35 31 48 42 Events per Hundred Switches 3.5 5.8 2.5 0.8 0.8 2.7 2.3 1.4 3.1 Events per Million Access Lines 2.44 4.63 1.84 0.34 0.88 1.92 1.39 2.59 5.19 Average Outage Duration in Minutes 42.1 37.7 24.0 4.0 658.6 1595.1 20.8 100.5 91.8 Average Lines Affected per Event in Thousands 12.4 7.8 19.0 40.9 32.4 17.6 26.4 6.3 12.5 Outage Line-Minute per Event in Thousands 265.5 319.9 344.2 137.8 19,692.1 57,458.8 241.6 395.1 742.4 Outage Line-Minute per 1,000 Access Lines 648.1 1,480.5 634.5 46.5 17,402.6110,082.4 335.7
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/00socc.pdf
  • 0.77 0.75 Netherlands 1.45 1.56 1.29 0.69 0.69 0.59 0.37 0.36 0.27 0.19 0.14 0.13 0.12 Nigeria 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.40 1.15 0.77 0.75 Pakistan 2.55 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.20 2.00 1.20 1.20 0.84 0.72 Peru 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.50 1.40 1.30 1.30 1.23 1.00 0.85 0.66 0.50 0.50 Philippines 1.98 1.92 1.85 1.68 1.68 1.34 1.23 1.00 1.00 0.72 0.57 0.38 0.38 Poland 1.50 1.50 1.35 1.30 1.25 1.20 1.15 0.95 0.70 0.55 0.38 0.38 0.38 Russia 3.00 3.00 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 Saudia Arabia 2.36 2.36 2.20 2.20 2.20 2.20 2.20 2.20 2.03 1.73 1.37 0.28 0.28 Sierra Leone 3.00 1.50 1.50 1.50
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/01socc.pdf
  • 67.6 41.1 28.3 12.8 1.89 0.75 1.24 3.88 9.0KY Louisiana 111.1 51.1 60.0 48.3 11.7 1.59 (0.17) 1.00 2.42 9.3LA Maine 37.6 16.9 20.7 10.6 10.1 2.69 0.84 2.06 5.58 4.5ME Maryland 274.8 143.3 131.6 78.9 52.7 12.58 5.29 12.07 29.94 22.7MD Massachusetts 249.2 110.1 139.1 66.2 72.9 11.37 7.91 26.17 45.45 27.4MA Michigan 221.5 187.1 34.4 15.2 19.2 3.01 1.92 0.83 5.76 13.5MI Minnesota 153.4 74.1 79.2 57.2 22.1 11.28 1.71 0.72 13.71 8.4MN Mississippi 148.4 24.8 123.6 118.0 5.7 (0.50) (0.21) 0.46 (0.26) 5.9MS Missouri 479.6 363.8 115.8 84.1 31.7 11.52 3.51 5.02 20.05 11.6MO Montana 10.4 9.4 1.0 (0.3) 1.3 0.03 (0.17) (0.37) (0.51) 1.8MT Nebraska 131.3 49.5 81.8 60.4 21.4 8.13 3.37 6.21 17.71 3.7NE Nevada 122.2
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/95socc.pdf
  • TAX AFTER TAX INVESTMENT 3/ GTE CORPORATION: 27. CONTEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC. 27.82% 72.18% 8.95 6.07 13.64% 28. CONTEL OF THE SOUTH, INC. d/b/a GTE SYSTEMS OF THE SOUTH 37.09% 62.91% 9.06 6.30 13.63% 29. GTE CALIFORNIA INC. 30.67% 69.33% 7.03 4.76 8.20% 30. GTE FLORIDA INC. 37.70% 62.30% 5.02 3.36 8.42% 31. GTE HAWAIIAN TELEPHONE CO. INC. 38.18% 61.82% 1.92 1.73 4.34% 32. GTE MIDWEST INC. 35.68% 64.32% 6.32 4.43 12.00% 33. GTE NORTH INC. 30.99% 69.01% 7.30 5.03 10.86% 34. GTE NORTHWEST INC. 34.04% 65.96% 5.03 3.68 9.63% 35. GTE SOUTH INC. 23.37% 76.63% 6.44 4.42 9.13% 36. GTE SOUTHWEST INC. 36.11% 63.89% 5.74 4.08 7.61% 37. THE LINCOLN TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO. 21.59% 78.41% 7.56 5.07 15.56% 38.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/96socc.pdf
  • 0.60 1.10 0.55 1.05 1974 2.37 4.67 1.35 2.60 1.15 2.15 1.85 3.60 1.05 2.05 0.80 1.55 0.94 1.79 0.60 1.10 0.55 1.05 1975 12/ 2.16 4.16 1.40 2.70 0.86 1.66 1.90 3.65 1.24 2.37 0.76 1.46 1.40 2.65 0.91 1.72 0.56 1.06 1976 13/ 2.06 3.96 1.34 2.57 0.82 1.58 1.86 3.56 1.21 2.31 0.74 1.42 1.55 2.95 1.01 1.92 0.62 1.18 1977 14/ 2.06 3.96 1.34 2.57 0.82 1.58 1.86 3.56 1.21 2.31 0.74 1.42 1.59 3.04 1.03 1.98 0.64 1.22 1978 2.06 3.96 1.34 2.57 0.82 1.58 1.86 3.56 1.21 2.31 0.74 1.42 1.59 3.04 1.03 1.98 0.64 1.22 1979 2.06 3.96 1.34 2.57 0.82 1.58 1.86 3.56 1.21 2.31 0.74 1.42 1.59 3.04 1.03 1.98 0.64 1.22
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/97socc.pdf
  • 0.60 1.10 0.55 1.05 1974 2.37 4.67 1.35 2.60 1.15 2.15 1.85 3.60 1.05 2.05 0.80 1.55 0.94 1.79 0.60 1.10 0.55 1.05 1975 12/ 2.16 4.16 1.40 2.70 0.86 1.66 1.90 3.65 1.24 2.37 0.76 1.46 1.40 2.65 0.91 1.72 0.56 1.06 1976 13/ 2.06 3.96 1.34 2.57 0.82 1.58 1.86 3.56 1.21 2.31 0.74 1.42 1.55 2.95 1.01 1.92 0.62 1.18 1977 14/ 2.06 3.96 1.34 2.57 0.82 1.58 1.86 3.56 1.21 2.31 0.74 1.42 1.59 3.04 1.03 1.98 0.64 1.22 1978 2.06 3.96 1.34 2.57 0.82 1.58 1.86 3.56 1.21 2.31 0.74 1.42 1.59 3.04 1.03 1.98 0.64 1.22 1979 2.06 3.96 1.34 2.57 0.82 1.58 1.86 3.56 1.21 2.31 0.74 1.42 1.59 3.04 1.03 1.98 0.64 1.22
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/98SOCC.PDF
  • 0.60 1.10 0.55 1.05 1974 2.37 4.67 1.35 2.60 1.15 2.15 1.85 3.60 1.05 2.05 0.80 1.55 0.94 1.79 0.60 1.10 0.55 1.05 1975 12/ 2.16 4.16 1.40 2.70 0.86 1.66 1.90 3.65 1.24 2.37 0.76 1.46 1.40 2.65 0.91 1.72 0.56 1.06 1976 13/ 2.06 3.96 1.34 2.57 0.82 1.58 1.86 3.56 1.21 2.31 0.74 1.42 1.55 2.95 1.01 1.92 0.62 1.18 1977 14/ 2.06 3.96 1.34 2.57 0.82 1.58 1.86 3.56 1.21 2.31 0.74 1.42 1.59 3.04 1.03 1.98 0.64 1.22 1978 2.06 3.96 1.34 2.57 0.82 1.58 1.86 3.56 1.21 2.31 0.74 1.42 1.59 3.04 1.03 1.98 0.64 1.22 1979 2.06 3.96 1.34 2.57 0.82 1.58 1.86 3.56 1.21 2.31 0.74 1.42 1.59 3.04 1.03 1.98 0.64 1.22
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/99socc.pdf
  • 0.71 0.51 Mexico $.791/0.25 $.75/0.25$.715/0.25 $.68/0.25 $.58/0.25 $.53/0.28$.485/0.32$.395/.395 $.37/.37 $.19/.19 $.19/.19 Netherlands 1.56 1.29 0.69 0.69 0.59 0.37 0.36 0.27 0.19 0.14 0.13 Nigeria 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.40 1.15 0.92 Pakistan 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.20 2.00 1.20 1.20 1.20 Peru 2.00 2.00 1.50 1.40 1.30 1.30 1.23 1.00 0.85 0.66 0.58 Philippines 1.92 1.85 1.68 1.68 1.34 1.23 1.00 1.00 0.72 0.57 0.38 Poland 1.50 1.35 1.30 1.25 1.20 1.15 0.95 0.70 0.55 0.38 0.38 Russia 3.00 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 Saudi Arabia 2.36 2.20 2.20 2.20 2.20 2.20 2.20 2.03 1.73 1.37 1.32 South Africa 2.00 1.80 1.80 1.50 1.20 1.20 1.00 1.00 0.80 0.70 0.60
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/2000/da001826.doc
  • system (22,000 km of submarine cable and 3,000 km of terrestrial links across Argentina, Chile and Guatemala) in a self-healing ring architecture comprised of four fiber pairs ultimately capable of carrying 48 channels at 10 Gbps each. Initial capacity on the SAm-1 system will be 40 Gbps. Multiple upgrades will be possible using dense wave division multiplexing (DWDM) up to 1.92 Tbps. Applicants anticipate having the system in service by November 30, 2000. SAm-1's undersea cable segments and their capacity are summarized in Exhibit B attached to this Order. Comments We placed the Application on public notice on February 18, 2000. Tyco Submarine Systems Ltd. (Tyco Submarine) filed comments in support of the application on March 17, 2000. Pursuant to Section
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0201.pdf
  • OTHER - Remote 1 Red Mesa,AZ - OTHER - Remote 1 Red Mesa,AZ - OTHER - E000489 SES-LIC-20000808-01388 WILLIAMS COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Application for Authority Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service, International Fixed Satellite Service 40 � 44 ' 3.00 " N LAT. SITE ID: COM-21 27 RANDOLPH STREET, CARTERET, NJ 74 � 13 ' 1.92 " W LONG. LOCATION: ANDREW 1 5.6 meters ANTENNA ID: ES56 75.30 dBW COMPRESSED DIGITAL VIDEO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 36M0G1F 75.30 dBW COMPRESSED DIGITAL VIDEO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 31M2G2F 71.70 dBW COMPRESSED DIGITAL VIDEO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 8M00G7W 75.30 dBW DIGITAL DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 36M0G1W 63.10 dBW DIGITAL DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 1M54G7D 54.85
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
  • Completed � Total No Dispatch 0.71 0 0.57 0.43 a,b PR-2-03-2120 Average Interval Completed � Dispatch (1-5 Lines) 4.49 NA 4.55 11 b POTS & Complex Aggregate PR-2 - Average Completed Interval PR-2-18-2103 Average Interval Completed � Disconnects 2.92 2.19 2.72 3.37 2-Wire Digital Services PR-2 - Average Completed Interval PR-2-01-2341 Average Interval Completed � Total No Dispatch 1.63 2.67 1.92 1.36 a PR-2-02-2341 Average Interval Completed � Total Dispatch 5 NA 5.8 4 b PR-4 - Missed Appointments PR-4-02-2341 Average Delay Days � Total 3.67 NA 6 NA NA NA 30 NA 2 NA PR-4-03-2341 % Missed Appointment � Customer 4.44 0 20.88 0 26.79 11.11 5.88 0 PR-4-04-2341 % Missed Appointment � Verizon � Dispatch 5 NA 1.69 0
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011489.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011489.html
  • a written notice of appearance in order to avail himself of the opportunity to be heard. The OSC explained that if Mr. Brewer failed to file a timely written notice of appearance, his right to a hearing on the matter of his captioned station licenses would be deemed waived, and the proceeding thereafter would be conducted in accordance with Section 1.92 of the Commission's rules. By Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 01M-11, released May 4, 2001, the Presiding Judge determined that Mr. Brewer had received a copy of the OSC, but failed to file a written (or any other) notice of appearance seeking to avail himself of the opportunity to be heard. Accordingly, the Presiding Judge concluded that the hearing was
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da012152.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da012152.html
  • Two-Way Radio, Inc. K. Lawson Pedigo, Esq. Ronnie Wilson, Esq. Fulbright & Jaworski, L.L.P. 100 North Central Expressway, Suite 1211 2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 2800 Richardson, Texas, 75080 Dallas, Texas, 75201 Counsel for David and Diane Brasher David H. Solomon Chief, Enforcement Bureau Letter from Carolyn S. Lutz to the FCC dated September 29, 2000; Joint Statement Pursuant to Section 1.92 of the Rules filed by Jim Sumpter, Norma Sumpter, Melissa Sumpter and Jennifer Hill on October 6, 2000. We note that Melissa Sumpter recently married, but her license for station WPJS437 is in her maiden name. Federal Communications Commission DA 01-2152 L M � O P F [ \ � � � � ... � � " � � �
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01044.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01044.html
  • or by its attorney, shall file within 30 days of the release of this Order, a written appearance stating that it will appear at the hearing and present evidence on matters specified in this Order. If the licensee fails to file a timely written notice of appearance, the right to a hearing shall be deemed to be waived. See Section 1.92(a) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.92(a). Where a hearing is waived, the licensee may submit a written, signed statement of mitigation or justification within 30 days of the release of this Order. See Section 1.92(b) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.92(b). In the event the right to a hearing is waived, the Chief Administrative Law Judge (or presiding
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01074.html
  • appear at the hearing and present evidence on issues specified in 17, above. If Leslie D. Brewer fails to file a timely written notice of appearance, his right to a hearing on the matter of his captioned Amateur radio station and GMRS licenses shall be deemed to be waived, and the proceeding thereafter shall be conducted in accordance with Section 1.92 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.92. 22. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that Leslie D. Brewer may file his written request for a hearing on the matter of his captioned Amateur radio operator license in a consolidated filing with his written notice of appearance on the matter of his captioned Amateur radio station and GMRS licenses. 23. IT IS FURTHER
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-319A1.html
  • days of its receipt of this ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY FOR HEARING, file with the Commission a written appearance stating that it will appear at the hearing and present evidence on the issues specified above. An unexcused failure to each file a timely notice of appearance will constitute a waiver of such hearing, pursuant to Section 1.92(a)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.92(a)(1). 18. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT, if the hearing is waived, RMI may submit written signed statements pursuant to Section 1.92(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.92(b), which can deny, seek to mitigate, or justify its conduct with respect to Station WMGA(AM). In the event that RMI waives its right to a
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/FCC-02-32A1.html
  • rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.91(c), SHALL, within thirty days of its receipt of this ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, FILE with the Commission a written appearance stating that it will appear at the hearing and present evidence on the issues specified above. An unexcused failure to file a timely notice of appearance will constitute a waiver of such hearing, pursuant to section 1.92(a)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.92(a)(1). If the hearing is waived, Peninsula Communications, Inc. may submit a written signed statement pursuant to section 1.92(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.92(b), which can deny, seek to mitigate or justify its unauthorized operation of the seven noted translators. In the event Peninsula Communications, Inc. waives its right to a hearing,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-3513A1.html
  • a written notice of appearance in order to avail itself of the opportunity to be heard.10 The OSC admonished RMI that, if it failed to so file a written notice of appearance, its right to a hearing on the matter of its captioned broadcast license would be deemed waived, and the proceeding thereafter would be resolved in accordance with Section 1.92 (c) of the Commission's rules.11 5. The Presiding Judge determined that RMI had received a copy of the OSC but had failed to file a written (or any other) notice of appearance seeking to avail itself of the opportunity to be heard.12 Accordingly, the Presiding Judge concluded that RMI had waived its right to a hearing, and he terminated the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-1068A1.html
  • would appear on the date fixed for the hearing and present evidence on the specified issues.5 The OSC informed Mr. Scaggs that, if he failed to so file a written notice of appearance, his right to a hearing on the matter of his amateur license would be deemed waived, and the proceeding would be resolved thereafter in accordance with section 1.92(c) of the Commission's rules.6 4. The Presiding Judge determined that Mr. Scaggs had received a copy of the OSC but had failed to file a written notice of appearance seeking to avail himself of the opportunity to be heard.7 Accordingly, the Presiding Judge concluded that Mr. Scaggs had waived his right to a hearing, and the Presiding Judge terminated the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-1704A1.html
  • received a copy of the OSC but had failed to file a written notice of appearance seeking to avail itself of the opportunity to be heard.7 Accordingly, the Presiding Judge concluded that J Communications had waived its right to a hearing, and he terminated the proceeding and certified the case to the Commission for disposition in accordance with 47 C.F.R. 1.92(c). The Commission has delegated authority to the Enforcement Bureau for such revocation proceedings, terminated on the basis of waiver, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. 0.111(a)(17). III. DISCUSSION A. Facts 5. The GMRS is a short-distance, two-way land mobile radio service available for communications that facilitate personal or business activities of licensees and their immediate family members.8 Section 95.631(a) of the rules9
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1014A1.html
  • Tung Shih had received a copy of the OSC but had failed to file a written notice of appearance seeking to avail itself of the opportunity to be heard.7 Accordingly, he concluded that Tung Shih had waived its right to a hearing, and terminated the proceeding and certified the case to the Commission for disposition in accordance with 47 C.F.R. 1.92(c). The Commission has delegated authority to the Enforcement Bureau for such revocation proceedings, terminated on the basis of waiver, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. 0.111(a)(17). III. DISCUSSION A. Facts 5. Learned mode transmitters are typically sold as universal replacements or duplicates for garage door openers, keyless entry systems, security alarms, remote switches and similar types of radio controlled devices. These transmitters
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1889A1.html
  • File No. BPED-19990907MG Station in Daingerfield, Texas ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: July 6, 2005 Released: July 7, 2005 By the Acting Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. By this Memorandum Opinion And Order, acting pursuant to authority delegated to the Enforcement Bureau under section 0.111(a)(17) of the Commission's rules,1 we dismiss the above- captioned proceeding pursuant to section 1.92(d) of the Commission's rules.2 We conclude, based on the evidence described herein that KEGG Communications, Inc. (``KCI'') surrendered the license for FM translator Station K216EQ, Daingerfield, Texas and that the Media Bureau canceled that authorization.3 We further note that the presiding Administrative Law Judge (``Presiding Judge'') dismissed with prejudice KCI's captioned application for a construction permit for a new noncommercial
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-2015A1.html
  • this proceeding, David Edward Cox, in person or by his attorney, SHALL FILE with the Commission, within thirty (30) days of the release of this Order to Show Cause, a written appearance stating that he will appear on the date fixed for hearing and present evidence on the issues specified herein. 8. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.92(c) of the Commission's rules, if David Edward Cox fails to timely file a written appearance within the thirty (30)-day period, or has not filed a petition to accept, for good cause shown, a written appearance beyond the expiration of the thirty (30)-day period, the right to a hearing shall be deemed to be waived.15 Where a hearing is waived, the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-1570A1.html
  • this proceeding, Robert D. Landis, in person or by his attorney, SHALL FILE with the Commission, within thirty (30) days of the release of this Order to Show Cause, a written appearance stating that he will appear on the date fixed for hearing and present evidence on the issues specified herein. 8. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.92(c) of the Commission's rules, if Robert D. Landis fails to timely file a written appearance within the thirty (30)-day period, or has not filed a petition to accept, for good cause shown, a written appearance beyond the expiration of the thirty (30)-day period, the right to a hearing shall be deemed to be waived. Where a hearing is waived, the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-2463A1.html
  • would appear on the date fixed for the hearing and present evidence on the specified issues. The OSC informed Mr. Cox that, if he failed to so file a written notice of appearance, his right to a hearing on the matter of his amateur license would be deemed waived, and the proceeding would be resolved thereafter in accordance with Section 1.92(c) of the Commission's rules. 4. The Presiding Judge determined that Mr. Cox had received a copy of the OSC but had failed to file a written notice of appearance seeking to avail himself of the opportunity to be heard. Accordingly, the Presiding Judge concluded that Mr. Cox had waived his right to a hearing, and the Presiding Judge terminated the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-124A1.html
  • 1.80 of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 17087, 17100-01, P 27, 17112 Appendix A (1997), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999); see also 47 C.F.R. S 1.80(b). 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(3). 47 C.F.R. SS 1.91, S 1.221. See 47 C.F.R. S 1.21(b). See 47 C.F.R. S 1.221(c). See 47 C.F.R. S 1.92(a). See 47 C.F.R. S 1.92(b). See 47 C.F.R. S 1.92(c). 47 U.S.C. S 311(a)(2). 47 C.F.R. S 73.3594. 47 C.F.R. S 73.3594(g). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 06-124 7 Federal Communications Commission FCC 06-124 References Visible links 1. mailto:fccinfo@fcc.gov References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-124A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-124A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-128A1.html
  • M. Doty, in person or by their respective attorneys, SHALL FILE with the Commission, within 30 calendar days of the release of this Order to Show Cause, a written appearance in triplicate stating that they will appear on the date fixed for hearing and present evidence on the issues specified herein. 17. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 1.92(c) of the Commission's rules, if either CRS or Timothy M. Doty or both fails to timely file a written appearance as specified in paragraph 14, above, or has not filed a petition to accept, for good cause shown, a written appearance beyond the expiration of the 30-day period, the right to a hearing as to CRS and/or Mr. Doty SHALL
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-377A1.html
  • be heard, David L. Titus, in person or by his attorney, SHALL FILE with the Commission, within 30 calendar days of the release of this Order to Show Cause, a written appearance stating that he will appear on the date fixed for hearing and present evidence on the issues specified herein. 8. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 1.92(c) of the Commission's rules, if David L. Titus fails to timely file a written appearance within the 30-day period, or has not filed a petition to accept, for good cause shown, a written appearance beyond the expiration of the 30-day period, his right to a hearing shall be deemed by the Presiding Administrative Law Judge to be waived, and the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-4675A1.html
  • this proceeding, Lonnie L. Keeney, in person or by his attorney, SHALL FILE with the Commission, within thirty (30) days of the release of this Order to Show Cause, a written appearance stating that he will appear on the date fixed for hearing and present evidence on the issues specified herein. 9. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 1.92(c) of the Commission's rules, if Lonnie L. Keeney fails to timely file a written appearance within the thirty (30)-day period, or has not filed a petition to accept, for good cause shown, a written appearance beyond the expiration of the thirty (30)-day period, the right to a hearing shall be deemed to be waived. Where a hearing is waived, the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-4676A1.html
  • of appearance to state that Mr. Landis would appear on the hearing date and present evidence on the specified issues. In addition, the OSC informed Mr. Landis that, if he failed to so file a written notice of appearance, his right to a hearing would be deemed waived, and the hearing proceeding would be resolved thereafter in accordance with Section 1.92(c) of the Commission's rules. 4. The Presiding Judge determined that Mr. Landis had received a copy of the OSC but had failed to file a written notice of appearance seeking to avail himself of the right to a hearing. Mr. Landis sent separate letters to the Chief of the Enforcement Bureau and the Presiding Judge, stating that he could not
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-125A1.html
  • 503(b)(6). See Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section 1.80 of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 17087, 17100-01, P: 27, 17112 Appendix A (1997), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999); see also 47 C.F.R. S: 1.80(b). 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(3). 47 C.F.R. S:S: 1.91, S: 1.221. See 47 C.F.R. S: 1.92(a). See 47 C.F.R. S: 1.92(c). (Continued from previous page.) (Continued...) Federal Communications Commission FCC 07-125 25 Federal Communications Commission FCC 07-125 References 1. http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-125A1.pdf 2. http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-125A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-165A1.html
  • APPEARANCE stating that they will, individually and/or by legal representative, appear on the date fixed for hearing and present evidence on the issues specified herein. 26. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Chief, Enforcement Bureau, SHALL BE MADE a party to this proceeding without the need to file a notice of appearance. 27. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.92(c) of the Commission's rules, that if Buzz Telecom Corporation, Business Options, Inc., US Bell Corporation, Link Technologies, AVATAR, and/or their principals Kurtis J. Kintzel and/or Keanan Kintzel fail to timely file written appearances within the 20-day period referenced above, or have not filed a petition to accept, for good cause shown, a written appearance beyond the expiration of the 20-day
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-916A1.html
  • file with the Commission within 30 days of release thereof, a written appearance stating his intention to appear on the date fixed for hearing and present evidence on the specified issues. The Order to Show Cause informed Mr. Keeney that if he failed to file a timely written appearance, his right to a hearing would be waived pursuant to Section 1.92(c) of the Commission's rules, and the Presiding Administrative Law Judge would thereafter issue an order terminating the hearing and certifying the case to the Commission for resolution. 4. The ALJ issued Lonnie L. Keeney, Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 08M-13 (ALJ, rel. January 25, 2008) ("MO&O"), holding that Mr. Keeney had failed to file a written appearance and that his
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-246A1.html
  • proceeding, Shenzhen, in person or by an attorney, SHALL FILE with the Commission, within thirty (30) days of the release of this Order to Show Cause, a written appearance stating that it will appear at the hearing and present evidence on the issues specified above. 22. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 312(c) of the Act and sections 1.92(c) and 2.939(b) of the Rules, if Shenzhen fails to file a timely notice of appearance within the thirty (30) day period, or has not filed a petition to accept, for good cause shown, a written appearance beyond the expiration of the thirty (30)-day period, its right to a hearing SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE WAIVED. In the event that Shenzhen
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/fcc00314.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/fcc00314.txt
  • their attorneys, shall each file, within 30 days after receipt of this Order, a written appearance stating that it will appear at the hearing and present evidence on matters specified in that Order. If any of the licensees fail to file a timely written notice of appearance, the right to a hearing shall be deemed to be waived. See Section 1.92(a) of the Commission's rules. Where a hearing is waived the licensee may submit a written, signed statement of mitigation or justification within 30 days of receipt of the Order to Show Cause. See Section 1.92(b) of the Commission's rules. In the event the right to a hearing is waived, the Chief Administrative Law Judge (or presiding officer if one has
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-02-32A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-02-32A1.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-02-32A1.txt
  • 47 C.F.R. � 1.91(c), SHALL, within thirty days of its receipt of this ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, FILE with the Commission a written appearance stating that it will appear at the hearing and present evidence on the issues specified above. An unexcused failure to file a timely notice of appearance will constitute a waiver of such hearing, pursuant to section 1.92(a)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.92(a)(1). If the hearing is waived, Peninsula Communications, Inc. may submit a written signed statement pursuant to section 1.92(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.92(b), which can deny, seek to mitigate or justify its unauthorized operation of the seven noted translators. In the event Peninsula Communications, Inc. waives its right to
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-08-10A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-08-10A1.pdf
  • Appx. 1 (D.C. Cir. 2003) (per curiam). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.106(b)(1). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.102(b)(3). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.106(n). We reject A-O's claim that the staff was without authority to order A-O to cease broadcasting without either convening a hearing under 47 C.F.R. � 1.91 or determining that a hearing was waived pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.92. Where the facts demonstrate that a station has failed to transmit broadcast signals for a consecutive 12-month period, Section 312(g) results in automatic cancellation, without requirement of a hearing. See 47 U.S.C. � 307(c); 5 U.S.C. � 558(c); 47 C.F.R. � 1.62. See Miami MDS Co., 14 F.3d 658 (D.C. Cir. 1994); Commission for Open Media v. FCC, 543 F.2d
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-10-147A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-10-147A1.pdf
  • Muskegon Broadcasters, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 15464, 15472-73, �� 22-23 (1996). 47 U.S.C. �� 312(a) and (c). 47 C.F.R. � 1.91(a). 47 U.S.C. � 309(e), (k). 47 U.S.C. � 312(d). 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(1). 47 C.F.R. � 1.17. 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(3). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.91, 1.221. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.221(c). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.92(a)(1). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.92(c). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 10-147 Federal Communications Commission FCC 10-147 � � � � � � \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0 0
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/pd/pf/csreport.pdf
  • 48 3,532 4,580 0.87 0.71 1.64 2.32 7 23 n.a. 21 18India 1,453 1,986 23 3,462 734 0.72 1.44 1.77 2.50 1 24 17 18 12Italy 2,650 709 92 3,451 1,765 3.31 2.60 2.09 2.34 9 25 26 28 27Russia 1,528 1,484 40 3,052 439 1.00 1.53 2.38 3.53 7 26 22 25 22China 1,673 1,320 21 3,014 1,223 1.25 1.92 3.56 4.27 4 27 20 14 13Dominican Republic 2,297 556 0 2,853 633 4.13 5.17 3.10 2.15 2 28 n.a. n.a. n.a.Egypt 270 2,365 0 2,635 68 0.11 1.04 1.75 3.63 7 29 21 24 n.a.Malaysia 680 1,927 0 2,607 173 0.35 0.37 0.37 1.54 1 30 18 15 26Spain 1,493 1,057 2 2,552 1,878 1.41 1.73 1.65 6.01 Top
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files/ITRND01.pdf
  • Table 18 Average U.S. Billed Revenue per Minute for International Telephone Service By Region of the World Average Revenue per Minute 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 10 Year Decline Africa $1.38 $1.34 $1.29 $1.08 $1.01 $0.81 $0.71 $0.57 $0.40 $0.29 $0.21 -85% Antarctica and Maritime 10.25 8.37 4.37 6.97 3.80 1.67 3.61 3.83 3.73 1.92 1.48 -86 Asia 1.45 1.25 1.17 0.92 0.82 0.71 0.64 0.55 0.38 0.31 0.22 -85 Caribbean 1.02 0.96 0.97 0.84 0.75 0.66 0.48 0.44 0.32 0.25 0.24 -77 Eastern Europe 1.40 1.30 1.21 1.02 1.02 0.70 0.55 0.51 0.32 0.22 0.17 -88 Middle East 1.36 1.22 1.23 1.06 1.08 0.91 0.71 0.64 0.47 0.33 0.25 -81 North and Central America
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/materials/already-released/survivor090002.pdf
  • GDP Total Ad Volume Video Ad Volume Broadcast Ad Volume Cable Ad Volume Total Ad Volume as Percentage of GDP Total Video Ad Volume as Percentage of GDP Total Broadcast Ad Volume as Percentage of GDP Total Cable Ad Volume as Percentage of GDP 1975 1,635,200 27,900 5,263 5,263 0 1.71 0.32 0.32 0 1980 2,795,600 53,570 11,488 11,416 72 1.92 0.41 0.41 0.0026 1985 4,213,000 94,900 21,287 20,298 989 2.25 0.51 0.48 0.0235 1990 5,803,200 129,968 29,247 26,616 2,631 2.24 0.50 0.46 0.0453 1991 5,986,200 128,352 28,606 25,461 3,145 2.14 0.48 0.43 0.0525 1992 6,318,900 133,750 31,079 27,249 3,830 2.12 0.49 0.43 0.0606 1993 6,642,300 140,956 32,471 28,020 4,451 2.12 0.49 0.42 0.0670 1994 7,054,300 153,024 36,342 31,133 5,209 2.17
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-a.pdf
  • 0.02 0.34 0.54 0.79 1.57 Circulated Papers 7,397 2.92 1 1 2 4 7 MSA's Total Circulation 269 129,735 21,092 30,989 50,946 104,769 540,584 Circulation Per Capita 269 0.23 0.15 0.20 0.23 0.26 0.33 Circulation Per Household 269 .59 0.42 0.53 0.59 0.65 0.78 Circulated Papers 269 8.72 2 4 6 10 22 Paper Equivalents1 269 1.68 1.01 1.1 1.35 1.92 3.41 Newspaper Statistics2 (Burrelle's, Editor & Publisher) Newspaper Price 728 0.48 0.25 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 MSA Average Newspaper Price 234 0.49 0.35 0.48 0.50 0.50 0.57 Newspaper Pages 776 35 14 22 30 42 69 MSA Average Newspaper Pages 259 42 24 30 38 48 71 Newspaper Staff 830 17 4 8 11 16 51 MSA Average Newspaper Staff
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-b.pdf
  • Paper presented at 1997 Aspen Institute Forum, "Delivering on Diversity: New Approaches to Marketing Minority Programming." November 1997. 35 Table 1a: Summary Statistics, 1997 All MarketsMarkets with Black Data Markets with Hispanic Data Formats 14.80 16.31 16.84 Stations Total 24.48 26.65 29.33 Youth-Targeted 5.56 6.48 5.53 Middle-Age-Targeted 14.12 15.32 17.96 Older-Targeted 4.80 4.85 5.84 White-Targeted 22.55 22.62 27.96 Black (non-white)-Targeted 1.92 4.03 1.37 Hispanic-Targeted 1.07 0.78 4.65 Non-Hispanic Targeted 23.41 25.87 24.69 AQH Listening (%) Total 15.77 15.98 16.36 White (Non-Black) 15.44 Black 17.88 Non-Hispanic 15.80 Hispanic 17.50 Population (millions) Total 0.70 1.16 1.62 White (Non-Black) 0.63 0.97 Black 0.08 0.19 Non-Hispanic 1.28 Hispanic 0.07 0.11 0.33 Fraction Black 0.08 0.19 0.05 Fraction Black 0.05 0.03 0.25 Northeast 0.21 0.16 0.12