FCC Web Documents citing 1.928

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1064A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1064A1.pdf
  • Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at (717) 338-2602 or by email at Terry.Fishel@fcc.gov. - FCC - Attachment A Map: Frequency Coordination Between the United States and Canada By clicking on the following link, applicants can access a program on the FCC's web site which will determine if a set of coordinates is within the coordination zone: http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/index.htm?job=line_a_c See 47 C.F.R. § 1.928 (detailing FCC rule requirements pursuant to the Above 30 MHz Agreement). See Attachment A. For commercial applications, the Commission only coordinates proposals below five watts ERP upon request. Any proposal with an ERP of three to five watts that is rejected by Canada may be granted secondary status under the treaty if the Commission determines the potential for harmful interference
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-15A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-15A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-15A1.txt
  • entity. Disaggregation allows for multiple transmitters in the same area operated by different companies (thus the possibility of harmful interference increases). 47 C.F.R. § 27.15. Part 27 Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 10836-39 ¶¶ 96-103. 47 C.F.R. § 27.15(b)(1). 47 C.F.R. § 27.15(c)(1)(2); see also 47 C.F.R. § 1.2111. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1307. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. § 1.928 (regarding frequency coordination arrangements between the U.S. and Canada). 47 C.F.R. § 1.924. We will discuss FAS coordination in the section describing coordination with Government incumbents. See infra at Section III.E.3. Cf. Section 22.940(a)(2)(I) through Section 22.940(a)(2)(iv) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 22.940(a)(2)(i)-(iv). See LMDS Second Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 12659 ¶¶ 263-267. See, e.g.,
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-180A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-180A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-180A1.txt
  • 91. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 101.56(g)-(h). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 101.535(d)-(e). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 101.1111(d)-(e). Cf. 47 C.F.R. §§ 22.940(a)(2)(i)-(iv). See e.g., 47 C.F.R. § 22.940(a)(1)(i). See, e.g. 47 C.F.R. §§ 101.17(b), 101.1011(a). See, e.g. 47 C.F.R. § 101.1011(a). See 47 C.F.R. § 101.63(a). See 47 C.F.R. § 101.63(b). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1307. See, e.g. 47 C.F.R. § 1.928 (regarding frequency coordination arrangements between the U.S. and Canada). 47 C.F.R. § 1.924. This coordination may be necessary depending on the final rules adopted in this proceeding, near a limited number of Federal Government installations that require protection from FCC licensed stations in these bands. See 47 U.S.C. § 160(a)(1-3). This section provides the Commission with authority to forbear from
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-302A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-302A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-302A1.txt
  • Economic Census, Industry Series: Manufacturing, "Industry Statistics by Employment Size," Table 4, NAICS code 334220 (issued Aug. 1999). Id. Table 5, "Industry Statistics by Industry and Primary Product Class Specialization: 1997." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.913(a)(1). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.2105. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.913(a)(1). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.2107. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1307. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. § 1.928 (regarding frequency coordination arrangements between the U.S. and Canada). 47 C.F.R. 1.924. FAS coordination is required for DSRCS stations within 75 kilometers of certain government radar locations listed in 47 C.F.R. § 90.371(b). See 5 U.S.C. § 603(c). . As proposed by ITS America. See Second Proposed Band Plan at 3. See also July Ex Parte Comments at 24. (continued....)
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-56A4.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-56A4.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-56A4.txt
  • SBA's small business size standard for "other telecommunications" (annual receipts of $11 million or less)). See 13 C.F.R. 121.201, NAICS code 513220. 13 C.F.R. § 121.201. See 5 U.S.C. §§ 601 (3)-(5). See 13 C.F.R. § 121.210 (SIC 4833, 4841, and 4899). supra. 47 C.F.R. § 1.913(a)(1). 47 C.F.R. § 1.2107. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1307. See e.g., 47 C.F.R. § 1.928 (regarding frequency coordination arrangements between the U.S. and Canada). , supra. See 5 U.S.C. § 603(c). See supra para. 234. Coalition Proposal at 14. The Coalition states that ``high-power, high-site one-way operations tend to cause two types of problems. First, high-power, high-site one-way operations tend to cause interference to co-channel cellular system base stations that are located quite far away.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-11A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-11A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-11A1.txt
  • in the Industrial/Business Pool of the Private Land Mobile Radio Services. Under a 1962 international agreement, coordination between the United States (U.S.) and Canadian authorities generally is required in the assignment of these frequencies for areas north of ``Line A.'' ``Line A'' is an ``imaginary'' line within the U.S. approximately paralleling the U.S.-Canadian border. This definition is incorporated in Sections 1.928(e) and 90.7 of the Commission's Rules. ``Line A'' commences at Aberdeen, Washington, and terminates at the southernmost point of Searsport, Maine. License Modification Request. Under his license, Jubon is authorized for nationwide mobile itinerant operation on 151.625 MHz, and nationwide mobile operation on 151.925 MHz. On January 28, 2000, Jubon filed an application (FCC Form 600) with the Commission requesting
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2213A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2213A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2213A1.txt
  • contour does not include areas surrounded by the composite interior contour that is not part of the interference contours of the incumbent's individual sites''). See Public Notice, ``Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Site-by-Site Accepted for Filing,'' Report No. 895 (June 27, 2001) (File No. 0000494731). Range also argued that Superior's original application should have been coordinated with Canada. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.928 (coordination requirements). In its modification application, Superior requested Canadian coordination for the Baraga and Iron River sites, which the Commission obtained. Petition at 5-6. Id. at 5. See 47 C.F. R. § 1.931(b)(5) (citing 47 C.F.R. § 1.915(b)(1)). See Letter dated October 14, 1999, from Timothy E. Welch, Esq., counsel to Superior, to Roger Noel, Chief, Licensing and Technical Analysis
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-590A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-590A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-590A1.txt
  • Letter from JoAnn Boggs, Director, Pend Oreille County, Department of Emergency Management, to FCC, Gettysburg, Pennsylvania (dated Oct. 9, 2000) (STA Request). Line A refers to an imaginary line within the United States approximately paralleling the United States-Canada border and is the southern boundary of the established U.S./Canadian coordination zone. For a definition of Line A, see 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.928(e)(5), 90.7. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.928. See Coordination and Use of Radio Frequencies Above 30 Megacycles Per Second, Agreement Between the United States and Canada Revising the Technical Annex to the Agreement of October 24, 1962, June 24, 1965, T.I.A.S. No. 5833, at Arrangement A, 1(a)-4(a) (U.S./Canadian Above 30 MHz Agreement); 47 C.F.R. § 1.928(a). STA Request at 1-5. Id.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2030A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2030A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2030A1.txt
  • with Canada. In his Petition, Taylor argues that the Branch's decision is arbitrary and capricious, because it is not supported by the Commission's rules and does not take into account Taylor's technical showing. The frequencies requested by Taylor may not be assigned in the continental United States north of Line A, without prior coordination with Industry Canada, pursuant to Sections 1.928 and 22.169 of the Commission's rules, and the U.S.-Canada Interim Coordination Considerations for Band 929-932 MHz, as amended. On August 13, 2002, however, Taylor obtained permission from Industry Canada to relocate station WPMW737, subject to the conditions specified in an agreement letter. We therefore dismiss Taylor's Petition as moot and return his application to pending status for further processing. Accordingly,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2354A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2354A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2354A1.txt
  • Report and Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 17555, ¶ 17. 47 C.F.R. § 1.2107(d). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.2109(d). Id. 47 C.F.R. § 101.105 (Interference protection criteria), 47 C.F.R. § 101.1421 (Coordination of adjacent area MVDDS stations and incumbent public safety POFS stations), and 47 C.F.R. § 101.1440 (MVDDS protection of DBS). 47 C.F.R. § 101.147(p), § 101.1423, and §§ 1.928(f)(1) and (2). 47 C.F.R. § 101.105 and § 1.924. See supra note 1. 47 C.F.R. Ch. 1, Subpart I. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1305-1.1319. 47 C.F.R. § 1.2105 requires the disclosure on the short-form of the applicant's ownership information as set forth in 47 C.F.R. § 1.2112. Note that both of these sections were revised in the Part 1 Fifth Report
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3781A3.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3781A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3781A3.txt
  • No. 98-206, Memorandum Opinion and Order and Second Report and Order, 17 FCC Rcd 9614 (2002) (``Second Report and Order''). 47 C.F.R. § 101.105 (Interference protection criteria), 47 C.F.R. § 101.1421 (Coordination of adjacent area MVDDS stations and incumbent public safety POFS stations), and 47 C.F.R. § 101.1440 (MVDDS protection of DBS). 47 C.F.R. § 101.147(p), § 101.1423, and §§ 1.928(f)(1) and (2). 47 C.F.R. § 1.2105(c)(7)(i). See Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Provides Guidance on the Anti-Collusion Rule for D, E, and F Block Bidders, Pubic Notice, DA 96-1460, 15 FCC Rcd 6196 (1996). 47 C.F.R. § 1.2105(c)(1). See ``Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Clarifies Spectrum Auction Anti-Collusion Rules,'' Public Notice, 11 FCC Rcd 9645 (1995). See Auction No. 53 Procedures Public Notice at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3968A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3968A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3968A1.txt
  • No. 98-206, Memorandum Opinion and Order and Second Report and Order, 17 FCC Rcd 9614 (2002) (``Second Report and Order''). 47 C.F.R. § 101.105 (Interference protection criteria), 47 C.F.R. § 101.1421 (Coordination of adjacent area MVDDS stations and incumbent public safety POFS stations), and 47 C.F.R. § 101.1440 (MVDDS protection of DBS). 47 C.F.R. § 101.147(p), § 101.1423, and §§ 1.928(f)(1) and (2). See, e.g., International Bureau Seeks Comment on Proposals to Permit Reducing Orbital Spacings Between U.S. Direct Broadcast Satellites, Public Notice, DA 03-3903 (rel. December 16, 2003). 47 C.F.R. § 1.2105(c)(1); 47 C.F.R. § 1.2105(a)(2)(viii). See also Part 1 Seventh Report and Order, 16 FCC Rcd 17546 (2001); Part 1 Fifth Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 15297-98,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1554A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1554A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1554A1.txt
  • to § 2.301 of this chapter, MVDDS systems in the United States within 56 km (35 miles) of the Canadian and Mexican border will be granted conditional licenses, until final international agreements are approved. These systems may not cause harmful interference to stations in Canada or Mexico. MVDDS stations must comply with the procedures outlined under § 101.147(p) and § 1.928(f)(1) and (f)(2) of this chapter until final international agreements concerning MVDDS are signed. Section 1.928(f) of this chapter states that transmitting antennas can be located as close as five miles (eight kilometers) of the border if they point within a sector of 160 degrees away from the border, and as close as thirty-five miles (fifty-six km) of the border if
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2188A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2188A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2188A1.txt
  • § 101.103 (Frequency coordination procedures), 47 C.F.R. § 101.105 (Interference protection criteria), 47 C.F.R. § 101.109 (Treatment of incumbent licensees), 47 C.F.R. § 101.129 (Transmitter locations), 47 C.F.R. § 101.1421 (Coordination of adjacent area MVDDS stations and incumbent public safety POFS stations), and 47 C.F.R. § 101.1440 (MVDDS protection of DBS). See 47 C.F.R. § 101.147(p), § 101.1423, and §§ 1.928(f)(1) and (2). See 47 C.F.R. § 101.105 and § 1.924. See id. See supra note 1. Public Safety incumbents in the 12.2 - 12.7 GHz band can be identified by searching on the radio service code ``MW'' and limiting the search by upper and lower frequency band. 47 C.F.R. Ch. 1, Subpart I. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1305-1.1319. Auction No. 63
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2223A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2223A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2223A1.txt
  • 18 FCC Rcd at 23668 ¶ 58. 800 MHz R&O, 19 FCC Rcd 14969 (2004) ¶ 269. Existing BAS channel 1 occupies 1990 - 2008 MHz. Existing BAS channel 2 occupies 2008 - 2025 MHz Modification requires the filing of FCC Form 601 Main Form and Schedule I. 47 C.F.R. § 74.25. 47 C.F.R. § 74.24. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.928. See 47 C.F.R. § 74.25 Id. Id. See Request for Declaratory Ruling in the Matter of Number of Transmitters Authorized by a Part 74 TV Pickup License, filed by SBE on March 11, 2005. (Request) See 47 C.F.R 74.601(a) Request at ¶ 1 Id. Request at ¶ 2 Id. at ¶ 3 See 47 C.F.R. § 74.632(a). 47 C.F.R. §
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2960A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2960A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2960A1.txt
  • (2002) (``Second Report and Order''). (Auction 63 Seminar, ``Overview of MVDDS Rules and Due Diligence,'' held on September 28, 2005). 47 C.F.R. § 101.105 (interference protection criteria), 47 C.F.R. § 101.1421 (coordination of adjacent area MVDDS stations and incumbent public safety POFS stations), and 47 C.F.R. § 101.1440 (MVDDS protection of DBS). 47 C.F.R. § 101.147(p), § 101.1423, and §§ 1.928(f)(1) and (2). See, e.g., International Bureau Seeks Comment on Proposals to Permit Reducing Orbital Spacings Between U.S. Direct Broadcast Satellites, Public Notice, 18 FCC Rcd 25683 (2003). Auction No. 63 Procedures Public Notice at 6-7. 47 C.F.R § 101.1412; see also Second Report and Order at ¶¶159-170. 47 C.F.R § 101.1412(a). 47 C.F.R. § 1.2105(a)(2)(viii); 47 C.F.R. § 1.2105(c)(1). See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-459A6.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-459A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-459A6.txt
  • button, which appears at the bottom of appropriate Ownership Filing screens. When the filing is submitted successfully, a confirmation screen will display the filer's FRN and the date of submission. Note: For additional instructions regarding electronic filing of ownership information, use the Help button, located on the top right of any screen within Ownership Filing. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.927, 1.928(a)(2), and 1.2107(c). Applicants applying for markets where they are seeking a tribal lands bidding credit must attach all tribal government certifications, applicant certifications, and waiver exhibits, as applicable, within 180 days of filing their long-form application. See discussion in Section IV. Applicants do not need to include these attachments in applications in which tribal lands bidding credits are not being
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-746A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-746A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-746A1.txt
  • Order, 9 FCC Rcd 4957, 5019 (1994) (PCS MO&O), citing WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969). Waiver Request at 2. Id. Id. Id. at 4. Id. Id. at 1. Canadian approval is required for certain frequencies, including those associated with the Rochester license, when the proposed facilities will be above Line A. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.928. Id. Amendment to Waiver Request at 1. Id. Id. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.925(b)(3)(i). See Interstate Power and Light Co, Requests for Extension of Time to Construct Private Land Mobile Radio Stations WPBI312, WPBI313, WPBI314, WPBI315, WPBI316, WPBI317, and WPBI318, and Waiver of Sections 1.946 and 90.629 of the Commission's Rules, Order, 18 FCC Rcd 11051, 11056 ¶ 15(2003). 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1064A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1064A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1064A1.txt
  • Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at (717) 338-2602 or by email at Terry.Fishel@fcc.gov. - FCC - Attachment A Map: Frequency Coordination Between the United States and Canada By clicking on the following link, applicants can access a program on the FCC's web site which will determine if a set of coordinates is within the coordination zone: http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/index.htm?job=line_a_c See 47 C.F.R. § 1.928 (detailing FCC rule requirements pursuant to the Above 30 MHz Agreement). See Attachment A. For commercial applications, the Commission only coordinates proposals below five watts ERP upon request. Any proposal with an ERP of three to five watts that is rejected by Canada may be granted secondary status under the treaty if the Commission determines the potential for harmful interference
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-534A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-534A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-534A1.txt
  • the subject bands 1525-1559 and 1626.5-1660.5 MHz for exchange of specific station information concerning ATC operations. However, as a general rule, wireless operations must not cause harmful interference across the Canadian and Mexican borders. In order to ensure that ATC operations do not cause harmful interference across our Canadian and Mexican borders, we will apply the notification thresholds in Section 1.928(f) of the Commission's rules for SkyTerra base stations near either of those borders. If, in the future, further agreements between and among the United States, Mexico and Canada concerning ATC operations should be reached, we will require licensees to comply with the provisions in those agreements. Out-of-Band Emissions in the 1559-1610 MHz Band. To prevent interference with reception of satellite
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-534A1_Rcd.pdf
  • to the subject bands 1525-1559 and 1626.5-1660.5 MHz for exchange of specific station information concerning ATC operations. However, as a general rule, wireless operations must not cause harmful interference across the Canadian and Mexican borders. In order to ensure that ATC operations do not cause harmful interference across our Canadianand Mexican borders, we will apply the notification thresholds in Section 1.928(f) of the Commission's rules for SkyTerra base stations near either of those borders. If, in the future, further agreements between and among the United States, Mexico and Canada concerning ATC operations should be reached, we will require licensees to comply with the provisions in those agreements. 45.Out-of-Band Emissions in the 1559-1610 MHz Band. To prevent interference with reception of satellite
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-412A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-412A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-412A1.txt
  • are needed to set forth the general application process and licensing rules for the Wireless Radio Services, including requirements for submitting applications that specify a mailing address for receiving service and correspondence and coordinating the assignment of frequencies near the Canada-United States borders. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 154, 161, 303 and 332. Section Number and Title: 1.923(i) Content of applications. 1.928 Frequency coordination, Canada. SUBPART Z-COMMUNICATIONS ASSISTANCE FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT ACT [CALEA] Brief Description: Part 1 contains rules pertaining to Commission practices and procedures. Subpart Z specifies that all carriers subject to CALEA must comply with the assistance capability requirements of CALEA section 103 and the systems security and integrity requirements of CALEA section 105, and also lists the specific capability
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262093A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262093A1.pdf
  • by great circle arc. . . so as to include all the Alaskan Panhandle. Id. See Exchange of Notes (October 24, 1962) Between the Government of Canada and the Government of the United States of America Concerning the Coordination and Use of Radio Frequencies Above Thirty Megacycles Per Second, Technical Annex (revised June 16, 1965). See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.928. Section 312(f)(1) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 312(f)(1), which applies to violations for which forfeitures are assessed under Section 503(b) of the Act, provides that "[t]he term 'willful', when used with reference to the commission or omission of any act, means the conscious and deliberate commission or omission of such act, irrespective of any intent to violate any provision
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298965A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298965A2.txt
  • number of the receiver. FCC 601 Schedule M - Instructions February 2008 - Page 4 Revised June 22, 2010 Item 45 Not required for ITS and 3650 ­ 3700 MHz. Enter the receiver stability (percentage). Item 46 Not required for ITS and 3650 ­ 3700 MHz. Enter the receiver noise figure (dB). Item 47 For 70/80/90 GHz, refer to Rule 1.928(f). For ITS operations that require coordination with Canada, answer `Y' only if operation is north of Line A (or east of Line C) and the station is operating with a power (ERP) greater than 5 watts. Refer to Rule 1.928(e) for a definition of Line A (or Line C). Item 48 This item is required for compliance with the National
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-92A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-92A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-92A1.txt
  • coordination must be done on a non-discriminatory basis. (iv) All licensees must abide by the decision of the coordinator. The Commission will be the final arbiter of any disputes. (3) An unanticipated need will never be deemed to exist for a scheduled event, such as a convention, sporting event, etc. (h) * * * (1) * * * See § 1.928(e) of this chapter for a definition of Line A and Line C. * * * * * (i) * * * It shall simply be necessary for the licensee to contact the potentially affected agency and obtain advance approval for the proposed short-term operation. Where protection to FCC monitoring stations is concerned, approval for short-term operation may be given by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-116A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-116A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-116A1.txt
  • Although we recognize Telesat's concerns, we agree with Pegasus and Northpoint that conditioning these licenses on future agreements addressing interference concerns between the affected countries will adequately protect Canadian licensees. Although we received no comments on specific methods or parameters for licensing MVDDS systems near the borders, we will rely on our existing procedures outlined under Sections 101.147(p) and Sections 1.928(f)(1) and (2) of our rules until final international agreements concerning MVDDS are signed. Section 101.147(p) of our rules states that terrestrial stations in the 12 GHz frequency band cannot cause any interference to broadcasting satellite stations of other countries operating in accordance with the Region 2 plan established at the 1983 WARC. Section 1.928(f) of our rules states that transmit
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-15A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-15A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-15A1.txt
  • entity. Disaggregation allows for multiple transmitters in the same area operated by different companies (thus the possibility of harmful interference increases). 47 C.F.R. § 27.15. Part 27 Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 10836-39 ¶¶ 96-103. 47 C.F.R. § 27.15(b)(1). 47 C.F.R. § 27.15(c)(1)(2); see also 47 C.F.R. § 1.2111. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1307. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. § 1.928 (regarding frequency coordination arrangements between the U.S. and Canada). 47 C.F.R. § 1.924. We will discuss FAS coordination in the section describing coordination with Government incumbents. See infra at Section III.E.3. Cf. Section 22.940(a)(2)(I) through Section 22.940(a)(2)(iv) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 22.940(a)(2)(i)-(iv). See LMDS Second Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 12659 ¶¶ 263-267. See, e.g.,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-180A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-180A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-180A1.txt
  • 91. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 101.56(g)-(h). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 101.535(d)-(e). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 101.1111(d)-(e). Cf. 47 C.F.R. §§ 22.940(a)(2)(i)-(iv). See e.g., 47 C.F.R. § 22.940(a)(1)(i). See, e.g. 47 C.F.R. §§ 101.17(b), 101.1011(a). See, e.g. 47 C.F.R. § 101.1011(a). See 47 C.F.R. § 101.63(a). See 47 C.F.R. § 101.63(b). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1307. See, e.g. 47 C.F.R. § 1.928 (regarding frequency coordination arrangements between the U.S. and Canada). 47 C.F.R. § 1.924. This coordination may be necessary depending on the final rules adopted in this proceeding, near a limited number of Federal Government installations that require protection from FCC licensed stations in these bands. See 47 U.S.C. § 160(a)(1-3). This section provides the Commission with authority to forbear from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-298A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-298A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-298A1.txt
  • coordination must be done on a non-discriminatory basis. (iv) All licensees must abide by the decision of the coordinator. The Commission will be the final arbiter of any disputes. (3) An unanticipated need will never be deemed to exist for a scheduled event, such as a convention, sporting event, etc. (h) * * * (1) * * * See § 1.928(e) of this chapter for a definition of Line A and Line C. * * * * * (i) * * * It shall simply be necessary for the licensee to contact the potentially affected agency and obtain advance approval for the proposed short-term operation. Where protection to FCC monitoring stations is concerned, approval for short-term operation may be given by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-302A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-302A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-302A1.txt
  • Economic Census, Industry Series: Manufacturing, "Industry Statistics by Employment Size," Table 4, NAICS code 334220 (issued Aug. 1999). Id. Table 5, "Industry Statistics by Industry and Primary Product Class Specialization: 1997." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.913(a)(1). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.2105. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.913(a)(1). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.2107. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1307. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. § 1.928 (regarding frequency coordination arrangements between the U.S. and Canada). 47 C.F.R. 1.924. FAS coordination is required for DSRCS stations within 75 kilometers of certain government radar locations listed in 47 C.F.R. § 90.371(b). See 5 U.S.C. § 603(c). . As proposed by ITS America. See Second Proposed Band Plan at 3. See also July Ex Parte Comments at 24. (continued....)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-248A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-248A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-248A1.txt
  • and 92-95 GHz bands. However, as a general rule, wireless operations must not cause harmful interference across the Canadian and Mexican borders. Discussion. In order to ensure that 71-76 GHz, 81-86 GHz and 92-95 GHz band operations do not cause harmful interference across our Canadian and Mexican borders, we will apply the restrictions at the border that are found in 1.928(f) of our rules for both Mexico and Canada. If, in the future, coordination agreements between and among the United States, Mexico and Canada should arise, we will require that licensees comply with the provisions contained in those agreements. License Term Background. In the NPRM, the Commission sought comment on the appropriate license term for licensees in the 71-76 GHz, 81-86
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-324A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-324A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-324A1.txt
  • in Appendix F. By comparison, in the 70-80-90 GHz Report and Order, we determined that non-Federal Government links will be registered in a third-party (i.e., non-FCC) database after an interim period. See 70-80-90 GHz Report and Order at ¶ 50. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.923(d) citing 47 C.F.R. Part 17. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1307. See, e.g. 47 C.F.R. § 1.928 (regarding frequency coordination arrangements between the United States and Canada). 47 C.F.R. § 1.924. Accord 70-80-90 GHz Report and Order at ¶ 56 (the Commission believes the licensee is in the best position to determine the nature of its operations and whether those operations impact certain settings). We clarify that this prioritization only applies between DSRC operations and does not
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-56A4.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-56A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-56A4.txt
  • SBA's small business size standard for "other telecommunications" (annual receipts of $11 million or less)). See 13 C.F.R. 121.201, NAICS code 513220. 13 C.F.R. § 121.201. See 5 U.S.C. §§ 601 (3)-(5). See 13 C.F.R. § 121.210 (SIC 4833, 4841, and 4899). supra. 47 C.F.R. § 1.913(a)(1). 47 C.F.R. § 1.2107. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1307. See e.g., 47 C.F.R. § 1.928 (regarding frequency coordination arrangements between the U.S. and Canada). , supra. See 5 U.S.C. § 603(c). See supra para. 234. Coalition Proposal at 14. The Coalition states that ``high-power, high-site one-way operations tend to cause two types of problems. First, high-power, high-site one-way operations tend to cause interference to co-channel cellular system base stations that are located quite far away.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-56A4_Erratum.doc
  • SBA's small business size standard for "other telecommunications" (annual receipts of $11 million or less)). See 13 C.F.R. 121.201, NAICS code 513220. 13 C.F.R. § 121.201. See 5 U.S.C. §§ 601 (3)-(5). See 13 C.F.R. § 121.210 (SIC 4833, 4841, and 4899). supra. 47 C.F.R. § 1.913(a)(1). 47 C.F.R. § 1.2107. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1307. See e.g., 47 C.F.R. § 1.928 (regarding frequency coordination arrangements between the U.S. and Canada). , supra. See 5 U.S.C. § 603(c). See supra para. 234. Coalition Proposal at 14. The Coalition states that ``high-power, high-site one-way operations tend to cause two types of problems. First, high-power, high-site one-way operations tend to cause interference to co-channel cellular system base stations that are located quite far away.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-99A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-99A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-99A1.txt
  • * * * * 9. Section 90.175 is amended by revising paragraph (i) and adding a new paragraph (j)(17) to read as follows: § 90.175 Frequency coordination requirements. * * * * * (i) Applications for facilities near the Canadian border north of line A or east of line C in Alaska may require coordination with the Canadian government. See §1.928 of this Chapter. * * * * * Applications for frequencies in the 4940-4990 MHz band. * * * * * 10. Section 90.205 is amended by redesignating paragraphs (o) through (q) as (p), (q), and (r) respectively, and adding a new paragraph (o) to read as follows: § 90.205 Power and antenna height limits. * * * * *
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-135A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-135A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-135A1.txt
  • and special districts with populations of less than 50,000). 5 U.S.C. §§ 601(4)-(6). We do not collect annual revenue data on ITFS licensees. 13 C.F.R. § 121.201. See 5 U.S.C. §§ 601 (3)-(5). See 13 C.F.R. § 121.210 (SIC 4833, 4841, and 4899). 47 C.F.R. § 1.913(a)(1). 47 C.F.R. § 1.2107. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1307. See e.g., 47 C.F.R. § 1.928 (regarding frequency coordination arrangements between the U.S. and Canada). , supra. , supra. , supra. See generally, 5 U.S.C. § 801 (a)(1)(A). See 5 U.S.C. § 604(b). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 04-135 Federal Communications Commission FCC 04-135 A- B- C- C- Federal Communications Commission FCC 04-135 C- Federal Communications Commission FCC 04-135 C- D- F- h h h h
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-207A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-207A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-207A1.txt
  • that it is providing substantial service within these service areas until May 19, 2006. On January 5, 2004, the Coast Guard filed an Application for Review of the grant of the waiver and extension to MariTEL. The Application for Review remains pending. MariTEL, Inc. Petition for Declaratory Ruling (filed Apr. 4, 2003) (MariTEL Channel 88 Petition). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.928(e), 2.1. The MariTEL Channel 88 Petition is concerned solely with the use of Channel 88 in the United States in the Great Lakes, Saint Lawrence Seaway, and Puget Sound and the Strait of Juan de Fuca and its approaches above Line A. MariTEL Channel 88 Petition at 1-2 n.2. 47 C.F.R. § 2.106 n.US223. See MariTEL Channel 88 Petition at
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/46/releases/fc020015.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/46/releases/fc020015.txt
  • Under the safe harbor, the licensee would be required to reach a minimum of one-third of the population in its licensed area, no later than the mid-point of the license term and two-thirds of the population by the end of the license term. We also seek comment on whether, 224 47 C.F.R. § 1.1307. 225 See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. § 1.928 (regarding frequency coordination arrangements between the U.S. and Canada). 226 47 C.F.R. § 1.924. 227 We will discuss FAS coordination in the section describing coordination with Government incumbents. See infra at Section III.E.3. 228 Cf. Section 22.940(a)(2)(I) through Section 22.940(a)(2)(iv) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 22.940(a)(2)(i)-(iv). 229 See LMDS Second Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 12659
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/46/releases/fc020152.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/46/releases/fc020152.txt
  • FCC Rcd at 10110; PCS Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 21866. 269 See, e.g., 39 GHz Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 18635 ¶ 73. 270 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.948. 271 47 C.F.R. § 1.2111(e). 272 See Service Rules Notice, 17 FCC Rcd at 2536 ¶ 91. 273 47 C.F.R. § 1.1307. 274 See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. § 1.928 (regarding frequency coordination arrangements between the U.S. and Canada). 275 47 C.F.R. § 1.924. 276 We will discuss FAS coordination in the section describing coordination with Government incumbents. See discussion infra Section IV.E.2. 277 See Service Rules Notice, 17 FCC Rcd at 2536 ¶ 93. Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-152 38 this requirement would apply to both new stations and
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc020116.pdf
  • we recognize Telesat's concerns, we agree with Pegasus and Northpoint that conditioning these licenses on future agreements addressing interference concerns between the affected countries464 will adequately protect Canadian licensees. 195. Although we received no comments on specific methods or parameters for licensing MVDDS systems near the borders, we will rely on our existing procedures outlined under Sections 101.147(p) and Sections 1.928(f)(1) and (2) of our rules until final international agreements concerning MVDDS are signed.465 Section 101.147(p) of our rules states that terrestrial stations in the 12 GHz frequency band cannot cause any interference to broadcasting satellite stations of other countries operating in accordance with the Region 2 plan established at the 1983 WARC.466 Section 1.928(f) of our rules states that transmit
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/resources/M_Pollak.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/resources/M_Pollak.pdf
  • of this chapter, MVDDS systems in the United States within 56 km (35 miles) of the Canadian and Mexican border will be granted conditional licenses, until final international agreements are approved. These systems may not cause harmful interference to stations in Canada or Mexico. MVDDS stations must comply with the procedures outlined under § 101.147(p) of this part and §§ 1.928(f)(1) and (2) of this chapter until final international agreements concerning MVDDS are signed. Section 1.928(f) of this chapter states that transmitting antennas can be located as close as five miles (eight kilometers) of the border if they point within a sector of 160 degrees away from the border, and as close as thirty-five miles (fifty-six kilometers) of the border if
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/63/resources/MVDDS_rules_excerpts.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/63/resources/MVDDS_rules_excerpts.pdf
  • Mexican coordination. Pursuant to §2.301 of this chapter, MVDDS systems in the United States within 56 km (35 miles) of the Canadian and Mexican border will be granted conditional licenses, until final international agreements are approved. These systems may not cause harmful interference to stations in Canada or Mexico. MVDDS stations must comply with the procedures outlined under §101.147(p) and §1.928(f)(1) and (f)(2) of this chapter until final international agreements concerning MVDDS are signed. Section 1.928(f) of this chapter states that transmitting antennas can be located as close as five miles (eight kilometers) of the border if they point within a sector of 160 degrees away from the border, and as close as thirty-five miles (fifty-six km) of the border if
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_factsheet&id=63
  • web site at [53]Tribal Land Bidding Credits. Interference Protection and Coordination MVDDS is licensed on a non-harmful interference co-primary basis to existing DBS operations and on a co-primary basis with NGSO FSS stations in this band. Among other things, the MVDDS operator must comply strictly with all of the interference protection and coordination requirements set forth in 47 C.F.R. 1.924, 1.928, 101.103, 101.105, 101.129, 101.147, 101.1421, 101.1423, and 101.1440. NGSO FSS: The MVDDS licensee must not locate MVDDS transmitting antennas within 10 km of any qualifying NGSO FSS receiver unless mutual agreement is obtained between the MVDDS and NGSO FSS licensees. (See 47 C.F.R. 101.129). Prior to the construction or addition of an MVDDS transmitting antenna, the MVDDS licensee must provide
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/4361-f00.pdf
  • 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $131,755100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 558,67948.8 8.4 3.9 9.928.9 Nigeria $44,553,00136.239.7 8.211.5 4.4 $4,744,51914.666.8 0.011.7 6.9 $4,970,16181.710.9 0.0 7.4 0.0 106,304,61615.144.8 3.711.924.5 Reunion $73,72015.262.9 1.2 3.916.9 $1,085 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $4,377100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 152,524 5.535.2 0.6 9.449.4 Rwanda $397,574 3.848.4 7.231.8 8.8 $307,496 0.099.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 $574,987 2.098.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,077,451 1.056.9 1.928.511.6 Saint Helena $242,924 1.2 0.6 0.197.3 0.8 $1,808 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $321100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 648,630 0.2 1.0 0.097.1 1.6 Sao Tome and Principe $653,92317.222.1 0.659.0 1.1 $125 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $55,131100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 648,255 6.013.6 0.478.3 1.7 Senegal $28,331,56036.122.3 0.737.2 3.7 $1,297,47736.835.6 0.0 0.027.6 $1,379,03492.1 7.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 52,597,58615.812.9 0.254.916.2 Seychelles $299,41372.116.6 1.6
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/4361-f01.pdf
  • 1 2 3 4 Other Minutes 1 2 3 4 Other Guyana $35,683,665 0.0 3.2 5.088.9 2.9 $8,533,974 0.0 1.1 0.090.2 8.7 $343,980 0.0 4.8 0.090.0 5.2 61,237,984 0.0 1.3 2.090.3 6.4 Paraguay $10,281,037 0.037.914.743.1 4.3 $712,647 0.017.312.030.440.3 $149,346 0.071.0 2.926.1 0.0 28,855,006 0.030.019.039.111.9 Peru $53,292,675 0.030.825.539.7 3.9 $5,285,334 0.022.3 4.334.239.2 $226,633 0.066.6 4.528.9 0.0 204,488,908 0.019.834.432.613.2 Suriname $11,256,043 0.062.1 1.928.5 7.5 $529,093 0.020.1 0.063.116.8 $658,941 0.088.9 0.011.1 0.0 16,280,384 0.048.4 2.034.215.3 Uruguay $18,077,800 0.047.817.231.9 3.1 $1,526,552 0.022.316.427.034.3 $137,138 0.091.7 4.6 3.7 0.0 55,025,412 0.038.025.927.6 8.5 Venezuela $71,059,130 0.049.525.521.1 3.9 $8,268,949 0.020.020.941.617.6 $166,171 0.057.312.929.8 0.0 281,840,053 0.028.930.633.1 7.3 South America $797,382,411 2.352.913.626.1 5.0 $93,151,282 0.022.019.246.212.6 $6,296,056 0.046.128.924.7 0.3 3,192,746,377 6.431.817.833.410.6 Afghanistan $261,702 0.0 0.010.0 0.090.0 $16,504 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $2
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/4361-f02.pdf
  • 1.9 Paraguay $6,383,67754.918.6 1.720.3 4.4 $463,72953.316.0 0.030.7 0.0 $93,26617.310.821.150.8 0.0 24,833,42540.718.9 2.930.4 7.1 Peru $30,095,93916.627.5 3.744.9 7.2 $2,076,65147.513.7 0.034.5 4.4 $390,16910.0 1.240.418.629.9 184,472,57514.625.4 5.139.515.3 Suriname $11,549,15876.4 0.5 0.221.7 1.2 $3,695,32691.2 0.0 0.0 8.8 0.0 $90,74895.2 0.2 1.0 3.6 0.0 29,073,35281.3 0.5 0.216.4 1.6 Uruguay $12,169,36857.716.9 1.218.1 6.1 $849,27247.813.7 0.036.6 1.9 $173,77586.0 3.3 0.0 4.4 6.4 51,506,95649.419.4 1.620.8 8.8 Venezuela $42,846,03039.724.5 1.928.1 5.8 $1,236,29812.927.7 0.049.510.0 $316,08050.521.4 7.520.7 0.0 166,857,23226.229.5 3.732.2 8.4 South America $578,155,39955.814.8 1.323.4 4.8 $59,298,83940.919.0 0.038.9 1.1 $9,880,23323.512.9 7.310.945.4 2,940,938,09532.518.2 2.836.8 9.8 Afghanistan $3,201,164 0.0 4.2 0.486.9 8.4 $219,870 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 0.0 $2,623 0.0 7.959.332.8 0.0 12,495,273 0.0 2.0 0.387.110.6 Bangladesh $23,422,91832.826.1 0.728.611.7 $207,86764.010.8 0.025.0 0.2 $967,03179.813.0 5.2 2.1 0.0 117,404,77411.929.5 1.044.213.3 Bhutan $56,605 1.935.0 0.631.231.2 $1 0.0 0.0100.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/02socc.pdf
  • 1,589 10,876 2,541 0.000 Borderland Communications, LLC 2 2 0 0.000 BPS Long Distance 71 448 134 0.000 Brazos Cellular Communications, Ltd. 296 1,032 403 0.000 BridgeCom International, LLC BridgeCom International, Inc. 1,066,988 2,962,677 835,648 0.016 Bright Long Distance, Ltd. 4,234 40,455 9,059 0.000 Broadview Networks, Inc. 1,548,676 6,413,542 1,957,276 0.037 Broadwing Incorporated Broadwing Communications Services, Inc. 211,920,286 964,237,301 102,982,804 1.928 Broadwing Telecommunications, Inc. 14,548,904 69,661,062 13,508,187 0.253 Cincinnati Bell Wireless, LLC 575,037 2,298,771 1,761,284 0.033 Progress International, LLC 5,123,804 64,047,547 11,061,507 0.207 BTC Communications, Inc. 16 484 143 0.000 BTC Holdings, Inc. Blackfoot Telephone Cooperative, Inc. 1,274 13,218 10,959 0.000 Clark Fork Telecommunications, Inc. 773 6,803 7,843 0.000 Montana Wireless, Inc. d/b/a Blackfoot Communications 536 3,213 1,718 0.000 Bulloch Net,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/prelim02socc.pdf
  • 1,589 10,876 2,541 0.000 Borderland Communications, LLC 2 2 0 0.000 BPS Long Distance 71 448 134 0.000 Brazos Cellular Communications, Ltd. 296 1,032 403 0.000 BridgeCom International, LLC BridgeCom International, Inc. 1,066,988 2,962,677 835,648 0.016 Bright Long Distance, Ltd. 4,234 40,455 9,059 0.000 Broadview Networks, Inc. 1,548,676 6,413,542 1,957,276 0.037 Broadwing Incorporated Broadwing Communications Services, Inc. 211,920,286 964,237,301 102,982,804 1.928 Broadwing Telecommunications, Inc. 14,548,904 69,661,062 13,508,187 0.253 Cincinnati Bell Wireless, LLC 575,037 2,298,771 1,761,284 0.033 Progress International, LLC 5,123,804 64,047,547 11,061,507 0.207 BTC Communications, Inc. 16 484 143 0.000 BTC Holdings, Inc. Blackfoot Telephone Cooperative, Inc. 1,274 13,218 10,959 0.000 Clark Fork Telecommunications, Inc. 773 6,803 7,843 0.000 Montana Wireless, Inc. d/b/a Blackfoot Communications 536 3,213 1,718 0.000 Bulloch Net,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-262093A1.html
  • thence by great circle arc. . . so as to include all the Alaskan Panhandle. Id. 4See Exchange of Notes (October 24, 1962) Between the Government of Canada and the Government of the United States of America Concerning the Coordination and Use of Radio Frequencies Above Thirty Megacycles Per Second, Technical Annex (revised June 16, 1965). See also 47 C.F.R. 1.928. 5Section 312(f)(1) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. 312(f)(1), which applies to violations for which forfeitures are assessed under Section 503(b) of the Act, provides that "[t]he term 'willful', when used with reference to the commission or omission of any act, means the conscious and deliberate commission or omission of such act, irrespective of any intent to violate any provision of