FCC Web Documents citing 1.94

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-87A7.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-87A7.txt
  • 56.50 59.16 66.87 69.17 Malaysia 16.56 18.32 19.49 19.76 ATTACHMENT 6 TELEDENSITY IN WTO SIGNATORIES ATTACHMENT 6 (continued) WTO SIGNATORY TELEDENSITY 1995 1996 1997 1998 Mauritius 13.11 16.21 19.52 21.37 Mexico 9.39 9.28 9.60 10.36 Morroco 4.33 4.60 5.00 5.44 Netherlands 52.52 54.33 56.43 59.31 New Zealand 47.85 49.92 48.57 47.91 Norway 55.64 55.55 62.11 66.01 Pakistan 1.64 1.77 1.85 1.94 Papua New Guinea 1.01 1.07 Not Available 1.14 Peru 4.71 5.99 6.75 6.67 Philippines 2.09 2.49 2.90 3.70 Poland 14.84 16.91 19.43 22.76 Portugal 36.13 37.49 40.25 41.35 Romania 13.08 13.98 Not Available 16.73 Senegal 0.98 1.11 1.32 1.55 Singapore 48.18 51.33 54.29 56.20 Slovak Republic 20.84 23.19 25.86 28.63 South Africa 9.47 10.05 10.72 11.46 Spain 38.50 39.25 40.32
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1557A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1557A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1557A1.txt
  • or more: Loral Space owns 8.76 percent of GTL's voting stock. A U.S. entity, Private Capital Management, Inc., holds an 8.6 percent interest. GLP's limited partners and their respective equity interests in GLP are: (1) DACOM Corporation of South Korea, with 0.14 percent; (2) Hyundai Corporation of South Korea with 0.28 percent; (3) Hynix Semiconductor, Inc. of South Korea with 1.94 percent; (4) TeleSat Limited of China, with 1.42 percent; (5) Vodafone Satellite Service, Ltd. of the U.K., with 2.78 percent; (6) TE.SA.M of France, with 2.78 percent; (7) San Giorgio S.p.A. of Italy, with 0.92 percent; (8) Vodafone Satellite Services, Inc., a Delaware company owned by transferee Globalstar Corporation, with 4.55 percent; (9) Loral/DASA Globalstar, L.P., itself 73.34 percent owned
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1557A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1557A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1557A1.txt
  • Commission's attribution principles to the ownership information submitted for the record by GLP and Globalstar Corporation, we find that the foreign entities identified below have the following attributable equity and voting interests in GLP: Interest Holder Equity Interests (%) Voting Interests (%) Loral Space 40.24 56.05 GTL 42.45 42.45 DACOM Corporation 00.14 00.14 Hyundai Corporation 00.28 00.28 Hynix Semiconductor, Inc. 01.94 01.94 San Giorgio S.p.A. 00.92 00.92 TeleSat Limited 01.42 01.42 Vodafone Satellite Service, Ltd. 03.20 03.78 TE.SA.M 03.20 03.78 Daimler-Chrysler Aerospace 01.85 06.88 AXA 02.49 06.20 Alenia ESpace 00.47 01.73 Home Market Determination for GLP's Foreign Investors As discussed above, there is a rebuttable presumption that foreign investment by entities having their ``home markets'' in WTO Member countries raises no
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-437A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-437A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-437A2.txt
  • ) EB Docket No. 03-85 File No. EB-02-TC-151 NAL/Acct. No. 200332170002 FRN: 0007179054 CONSENT ORDER Issued: February 18, 2004 Released: February 20, 2004 This is a ruling on Joint Request for Adoption of Consent Decree and Termination of Proceeding, filed on February 17, 2004, by the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Business Options, Inc. (``BOI'') in accordance with §§ 1.93 and 1.94 of the Commission's rules [47 C.F.R. §§ 1.93, 1.94]. This proceeding was set for hearing by Order to Show Cause and Notice of Opportunity for Hearing, 18 F.C.C. Rcd 6881, released April 7, 2003 (``OSC''). Issues were specified to determine whether BOI had made misrepresentations or engaged in lack of candor (Issue a); to determine whether BOI had changed consumers'
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1564A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1564A2.txt
  • Table 7-4. D/U Ratio With 8-VSB as Undesired Signal Relative to That with Bandlimited Gaussian Noise D/U Ratio Relative to Baseline (dB) Channel Offset A3 D3 I1 J1 M1 N1 O1 G4 Mean (dB) (Excluding G4) Standard Deviation (dB) (Excluding G4) N-6 -1.32 -1.25 -1.61 -0.73 -1.85 -0.87 -1.76 -3.72 -1.34 0.43 N-4 -1.31 -1.43 -0.92 -1.07 -1.66 -1.07 -0.87 -1.94 -1.19 0.29 N-3 -0.79 -1.85 -2.23 -1.73 -1.50 -2.38 -1.47 -0.26 -1.71 0.53 N-2 -0.76 -1.94 -2.31 -0.53 -1.31 -0.91 -0.71 -0.89 -1.21 0.68 N+2 0.02 -2.99 -1.94 -0.48 -0.04 -0.67 -0.40 0.50 -0.93 1.12 Mean -0.83 -1.89 -1.80 -0.91 -1.27 -1.18 -1.04 -1.26 -1.28 Std Dev 0.55 0.68 0.56 0.51 0.72 0.69 0.56 1.64 0.68 Note: The overall means
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A4.txt
  • alsousedasoneofourmeasuresofProgramQuality.Averageisoverthesamenetworksandtimeperiods describedinthenotestoTable6.ItiscalculatedbytakingtheaverageratinginTable8anddividingby theaverageavailabilityinTable7.SeeSection5.1formoredetails.Source:Authorcalculations. 38 Table10: ProgramProductionbyProgrammingTypeandTime 6:00p.m.-12:00a.m.EST(orequivalent),2weeks/year,2003-2006 Variable 2003 2004 2005 2006 NewsProgramming AnyNews 4.29 3.99 4.07 4.22 NetworkNews 0.60 0.51 0.49 0.46 LocalNews 3.69 3.47 3.58 3.76 PublicAffairsProgramming 2.37 2.13 1.88 1.59 MinorityProgramming NetworksTargetingBlackAudiences 3.26 3.61 3.45 3.23 TargetingLatinoAudiences OnNetworksTargetingLatinoAudiences 7.11 8.07 8.35 8.87 Spanish-LanguageProgramming 2.94 3.01 3.41 4.09 NetworksTargetingOtherDiverseAudiences 2.65 2.55 2.67 2.72 Children'sProgramming "Children'sProgramming" 1.70 1.91 2.15 1.94 GMoviesorTV-Y/TV-Y7TV 3.18 3.28 3.04 2.94 Eitheroftheabove 4.88 5.19 5.19 4.88 FamilyProgramming NetworksTargetingFamilies 11.46 10.89 10.69 10.74 TY-GProgramming 11.35 12.18 11.93 10.94 Arts,Educational,orDocumentaryProgramming 8.32 7.46 7.05 7.62 Eitherofthetwoabove 19.67 19.64 18.98 18.56 AdultProgramming NetworksShowingAdultProgramming 4.84 4.60 4.89 5.52 NC-17MoviesorTV-MA-S/TV-MA-LTV 0.75 0.48 0.63 0.83 ViolentProgramming "ViolentProgramming" 1.52 1.71 1.94 1.63 TV-PG-VTelevision 1.43 1.45 1.54 1.41 TV-14-VTelevision 1.37 1.40 1.56 1.51 TV-MA-VTelevision 0.15
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • Effect T-Stat Marg. Effect T-Stat Marg. Effect T-Stat Adj R-Squared N Format 101 Count 2.867 (0.27) 0.296* (5.96) 10.3716 (0.44) 1.871 (0.58) 0.001932* (3.45) 0.726 104 Format 101 HHI -0.098 (1.17) -0.001 (1.45) -0.1761 (-0.95) 0.013 (0.51) -0.000011* (-2.52) 0.072 104 Format 20 Count 1.226 (0.17) 0.116* (3.55) 11.1151 (0.72) 0.578 (0.27) 0.000810* (2.20) 0.426 104 Format 20 HHI -0.203 (1.94) -0.001 (1.79) -0.3479 (-1.52) 0.025 (0.80) -0.000008 (-1.42) 0.074 104 Format 11 Count -0.441 (0.13) 0.040* (2.47) -4.0090 (-0.53) -1.588 (-1.53) 0.000417* (2.31) 0.209 104 Format 11 HHI -0.219* (2.23) -0.001 (1.55) -0.4659* (-2.17) 0.020 (0.67) -0.000009 (-1.67) 0.035 104 With Demographics: Format 101 Count 11.711 (1.10) 0.268* (4.96) 11.8832 (0.50) 2.130 (0.64) 0.001146 (1.93) 0.763 104 Format 101 HHI
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A7.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A7.txt
  • (5) Local station ownership Cross-owned newspaper 46.9 (0.91) 77.2 (1.13) 50.5 (0.89) 91.6 (1.63) 78.8** (1.98) Cross-owned radio station -307.8** (2.56) -255.0** (2.16) -167.1* (1.89) -76.5 (1.20) Cross-owned radio and newspaper 124.2 (0.80) 190.1 (1.38) 143.4 (1.23) 23.0 (0.26) Parent company coverage of all television households (%) 17.3*** (3.70) 14.4*** (3.28) 3.4 (1.02) Network owned and operated -185.5* (1.70) -231.4* (1.94) -17.0 (0.18) Network affiliation (omitted category is CW\MyNetwork) ABC -16.3 (0.12) 324.1*** (3.35) CBS -74.3 (0.56) 331.6*** (3.47) FOX 333.0** (2.37) 106.6 (1.28) NBC -79.6 (0.60) 327.4*** (3.36) Other control variables Time and length of broadcast fixed effects No No No No Yes DMA and date fixed effects Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Adjusted R-squared .16 .23 .31 .51 .67
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1372A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1372A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1372A1.txt
  • findings. GLBA, in its Response, provided a new explanation that completely contradicted its prior explanation: When [GLBA] acquired the construction permit from American Family Association, there was about 6 months left to construct. SBA Towers owned the authorized tower and [Dr. McCluskey] did not realize that it was SBA instead of Clear Channel who owns a tower very close by (1.94 km due east of CP site). It was Clear Channel with whom [Dr. McCluskey] made his agreement and constructed on that tower, again not realizing that it was the wrong tower. Again, [Dr. McCluskey] constructed the facility according to what he believed to be accurate information. . . . [GRCAC's] objection caused the inspection of November 20, 2003. However, before
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1372A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1372A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1372A1.txt
  • 4.67 Cass Township OH2009 535 6 1.12 Homer Township OH1382 451 87 19.29 Hubbard Township OH0310 5,749 474 8.24 Mechanic Township OH2050 889 225 25.31 Mifflin Township OH2187 452 31 6.86 Nelson Township OH1592 1,167 23 1.97 Richland Township OH0061 459 1 .22 Ridgefield Township OH0463 875 38 4.34 Ripley Township OH1255 346 41 11.85 Smith Township OH0558 1,808 35 1.94 Springfield Township OH1690 OH1808 4,386 78 1.78 Washington Township (Stark County) OH1623 1,758 376 21.39 Weathersfield Township OH0211 11,025 548 4.79 CSR 8490-E Cuyahoga Heights Village OH1196 258 73 28.29 Linndale Village OH2289 66 6 9.09 Middlefield Township OH2653 1,186 96 8.09 Rice Township OH2099 514 114 22.18 Page 3 of the Petition in 8489-E states that competing provider effective
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.txt
  • (73) (42) (33) 2007 1.19 1.51 1.95 * (53) (40) (40) 2009 0.88 1.22 1.46 * (53) (31) (43) Table 11 (continued) Average Full-Service Commercial FM Stations' Revenue per Adult by Format Year No LPFM One LPFM Two or More LPFM News/Talk/Sports Format Market Measure 2005 3.02 2.35 2.46 (35) (20) (44) 2007 2.83 2.87 2.19 (25) (33) (71) 2009 1.94 1.94 1.66 (38) (46) (83) Contour Measure 2005 2.31 2.80 3.03 (45) (30) (24) 2007 2.05 2.76 2.71 (45) (38) (46) 2009 1.50 1.81 2.07 * (56) (48) (63) Miscellaneous Format Market Measure 2005 3.03 2.51 1.34 (8) (5) (6) 2007 4.54 6.17 4.32 (35) (25) (41) 2009 3.94 4.27 3.43 (51) (44) (79) Contour Measure 2005 1.52 1.77 4.43
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-646A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-646A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-646A1.txt
  • 0.25 -0.09 -0.02 -0.08 -0.18 -0.10 0.00 -0.01 -0.05 -0.24 1.00 Table 3 Capex (LnCapex) Regression Variable Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| LnLoops 0.788 0.071 11.15 0.00 * LnRoadMiles -0.208 0.136 -1.53 0.13 LnRoadCrossings 0.240 0.091 2.64 0.01 * LnStateSACs -0.070 0.043 -1.65 0.10 * PctUndepPlant 0.031 0.002 18.39 0.00 * LnDensity -0.158 0.072 -2.20 0.03 * LnExchanges 0.118 0.061 1.94 0.05 * PctBedrock36 -0.072 0.156 -0.46 0.64 Difficulty 0.118 0.087 1.36 0.17 Climate 0.089 0.030 2.99 0.00 * PctTribalLand 0.0005 0.001 0.47 0.64 PctParkLand 0.018 0.005 3.71 0.00 * PctUrban 0.001 0.002 0.34 0.73 Alaska -0.6223 0.337 -1.85 0.07 * Midwest 0.092 0.091 1.01 0.31 Northeast -0.309 0.124 -2.49 0.01 * Constant 6.039 0.416 14.51 0.00 * N = 726
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-244194A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-244194A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-244194A1.txt
  • the Act and section 54.706 of the Commission's rules, had willfully and repeatedly failed to make TRS Fund contributions in violation of section 64.604(c)(5)(iii)(A) of the Commission's rules, and had willfully and repeatedly failed to file Telecommunications Reporting Worksheets in a timely manner in violation of sections 54.711 of the Commission's rules. 7. On January 28, 2004, pursuant to section 1.94(a) of the Commission's Rules, the Bureau informed the presiding officer of the initiation of the negotiations that lead to this Consent Decree. Pursuant to section 1.93(b) of the Commission's rules, the Bureau negotiated this Consent Decree to secure future compliance with sections 214, 254, and 258 of the Act and related Commission rules in exchange for prompt disposition of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.txt
  • 0.68 0.67 0.42 0.41 0.31 -61.5 Pakistan 1.77 1.70 1.56 1.53 1.24 1.12 0.99 0.74 0.67 0.46 0.29 -74.2 Peru 1.14 1.07 1.03 1.03 0.87 0.87 0.80 0.67 0.49 0.31 0.20 -77.5 Philippines 1.52 1.41 1.29 1.29 1.08 0.96 0.76 0.62 0.47 0.31 0.26 -73.4 Poland 1.10 1.06 0.90 0.85 0.73 0.76 0.57 0.41 0.39 0.37 0.26 -65.2 Russia 1.99 1.94 1.82 1.57 1.28 1.17 0.69 0.62 0.43 0.27 0.24 -79.6 Saudi Arabia 1.34 1.41 1.25 1.20 1.05 1.08 1.00 0.88 0.75 0.53 0.30 -72.6 Sierra Leone 1.93 1.94 1.78 1.80 1.22 1.07 0.47 0.75 0.61 0.83 0.43 -60.0 Singapore 1.48 1.38 1.19 1.08 0.85 0.56 0.56 0.58 0.52 0.44 0.55 -0.7 South Africa 1.32 1.07 0.94 0.95 0.69 0.78 0.68
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255118A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255118A1.txt
  • e ba + - - . 16 TABLE 3 PARAMETRIC WEIBULL SURVIVAL ESTIMATES (Z-statistics in parentheses) Weibull (No Unobserved Heterogeneity) Weibull (Gamma-distributed Unobserved Heterogeneity) Millions of Subs -0.07*** (3.92) -0.13*** (3.95) Missing Subs -0.65*** (2.61) -1.07** (2.31) Vertical Integration 0.00 (0.07) 0.00 (0.02) Spinoff -1.39*** (2.64) -2.69*** (2.67) Missing Vertical or Spinoff 0.56** (2.51) 1.74*** (3.22) Born before 1984 -0.89* (1.94) -3.48*** (3.25) Constant -2.87*** (9.23) -4.46*** (6.58) a 0.28* (1.83) 2.39*** (3.95) sports a 0.79 (1.63) 3.36 (1.27) shop a 0.68** (2.52) 4.26*** (2.57) gvariance 6.30*** (3.24) Observations 305 305 Failures 96 96 Log Likelihood -363.10*** -348.97*** *- significant at 10% level, ** - significant at 5% level, *** - significant at 1% level 17 In the estimation without unobserved
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.txt
  • 0.68 0.67 0.42 0.41 0.31 0.27 -60.7 Pakistan 1.70 1.56 1.53 1.24 1.12 0.99 0.74 0.67 0.46 0.29 0.20 -79.4 Peru 1.07 1.03 1.03 0.87 0.87 0.80 0.67 0.49 0.31 0.20 0.12 -84.9 Philippines 1.41 1.29 1.29 1.08 0.96 0.76 0.62 0.47 0.31 0.26 0.16 -78.4 Poland 1.06 0.90 0.85 0.73 0.76 0.57 0.41 0.39 0.37 0.26 0.13 -77.6 Russia 1.94 1.82 1.57 1.28 1.17 0.69 0.62 0.43 0.27 0.24 0.24 -65.4 Saudi Arabia 1.41 1.25 1.20 1.05 1.08 1.00 0.88 0.75 0.53 0.30 0.26 -74.2 Sierra Leone 1.94 1.78 1.80 1.22 1.07 0.47 0.75 0.61 0.83 0.43 0.31 -33.8 Singapore 1.38 1.19 1.08 0.85 0.56 0.56 0.58 0.52 0.44 0.55 0.48 -13.9 South Africa 1.07 0.94 0.95 0.69 0.78 0.68
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • 0.15 0.07 0.13 18 23 District of Columbia 1 0.00 0.02 0.00 1 1 Florida 11,381,404 5.38 7.70 5.96 793 1,029 Georgia 4,371,379 2.07 1.75 1.99 264 343 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 337,463 0.16 0.42 0.22 30 39 Idaho 416,870 0.20 0.41 0.25 33 43 Illinois 4,959,073 2.34 3.60 2.66 353 459 Indiana 3,927,153 1.86 2.18 1.94 258 334 Iowa 1,965,442 0.93 1.50 1.07 143 185 Kansas 1,489,937 0.70 0.43 0.64 84 110 Kentucky 1,922,862 0.91 0.48 0.80 107 138 Louisiana 2,684,779 1.27 0.81 1.15 153 199 Maine 1,698,869 0.80 0.24 0.66 88 114 Maryland 4,864,029 2.30 1.24 2.03 271 351 Massachusetts 7,892,158 3.73 0.78 2.99 398 517 Michigan 5,075,422 2.40 4.27 2.87 381 495 Minnesota 1,939,714
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A3.txt
  • 0.15 0.07 0.13 18 23 District of Columbia 1 0.00 0.02 0.00 1 1 Florida 11,381,404 5.38 7.70 5.96 793 1,029 Georgia 4,371,379 2.07 1.75 1.99 264 343 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 337,463 0.16 0.42 0.22 30 39 Idaho 416,870 0.20 0.41 0.25 33 43 Illinois 4,959,073 2.34 3.60 2.66 353 459 Indiana 3,927,153 1.86 2.18 1.94 258 334 Iowa 1,965,442 0.93 1.50 1.07 143 185 Kansas 1,489,937 0.70 0.43 0.64 84 110 Kentucky 1,922,862 0.91 0.48 0.80 107 138 Louisiana 2,684,779 1.27 0.81 1.15 153 199 Maine 1,698,869 0.80 0.24 0.66 88 114 Maryland 4,864,029 2.30 1.24 2.03 271 351 Massachusetts 7,892,158 3.73 0.78 2.99 398 517 Michigan 5,075,422 2.40 4.27 2.87 381 495 Minnesota 1,939,714
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • 12.57 220348 C BULLOCH CNTY. RURAL TEL. COOP., INC. 0.14 0.00 0.14 -13.45 220351 C CAMDEN TEL. & TEL. CO., INC.-GA 7.73 -0.54 8.32 0.00 220354 C CHICKAMAUGA TEL. CORP. -3.19 -1.23 -1.99 0.00 220355 C CITIZENS TEL. CO., INC.-GA -3.65 0.05 -3.71 -18.59 220356 C COASTAL UTILITIES, INC. -7.35 -4.26 -3.23 -31.35 220357 C ALLTEL GEORGIA, INC. 1.69 -0.24 1.94 -6.53 220358 C DARIEN TEL. CO., INC. 15.58 -0.77 16.48 32.28 220360 C ELLIJAY TEL. CO. 3.80 1.63 2.14 1.08 220362 C FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF FAIRMOUNT, LLC -2.05 -1.79 -0.27 -7.29 220364 A GEORGIA TEL. CORP. 12.61 2.16 10.23 INFINITE 3 - 256 Table 3.32 High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2002 to 2003 by Study Area Study Area
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 957 972 851 952 934 987 936 2003 956 967 875 932 917 1002 941 2004 990 1000 923 988 946 1031 971 1980 1.94% 1.94% 1.95% 1.89% 2.09% 1.78% 1981 2.05 2.05 2.10 2.04 2.14 1.90 1982 2.08 2.08 2.07 2.01 2.09 2.16 1983 2.11 2.11 2.15 2.01 2.28 1.95 1984 1.98 1.98 1.97% 2.01 1.92 2.06 1.89 1985 1.94 1.93 1.98 2.01 1.85 1.97 1.93 1986 1.97 1.95 2.16 1.89 1.96 2.12 1.87 1987 2.04 2.01 2.32 2.02 2.02 2.17 1.95 1988 2.07 2.04 2.31 1.99 2.01 2.21 2.03 1989 2.04 2.02 2.19 2.02 2.04 2.18 1.87 1990 2.09 2.07 2.24 2.08 2.11 2.28 1.88 1991 2.09 2.04 2.42 2.01 2.15 2.20 1.95 1992 2.09 2.06 2.29 2.04 2.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • Delaware 175 0.29 160 1 187 13 District of Columbia 358 0.59 327 2 382 27 Florida 3,978 6.56 3,625 23 4,242 300 Georgia 2,285 3.77 2,082 13 2,436 172 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 253 0.42 230 1 270 19 Idaho 253 0.42 230 1 270 19 Illinois 2,261 3.73 2,060 13 2,411 170 Indiana 1,177 1.94 1,072 7 1,255 89 Iowa 497 0.82 453 3 530 37 Kansas 519 0.86 473 3 554 39 Kentucky 921 1.52 840 5 983 69 Louisiana 1,108 1.83 1,010 6 1,182 83 Maine 324 0.53 295 2 345 24 Maryland 1,240 2.05 1,130 7 1,323 93 Massachusetts 1,275 2.10 1,162 7 1,360 96 Michigan 1,686 2.78 1,536 10 1,798 127
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A3.txt
  • Delaware 175 0.29 160 1 187 13 District of Columbia 358 0.59 327 2 382 27 Florida 3,978 6.56 3,625 23 4,242 300 Georgia 2,285 3.77 2,082 13 2,436 172 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 253 0.42 230 1 270 19 Idaho 253 0.42 230 1 270 19 Illinois 2,261 3.73 2,060 13 2,411 170 Indiana 1,177 1.94 1,072 7 1,255 89 Iowa 497 0.82 453 3 530 37 Kansas 519 0.86 473 3 554 39 Kentucky 921 1.52 840 5 983 69 Louisiana 1,108 1.83 1,010 6 1,182 83 Maine 324 0.53 295 2 345 24 Maryland 1,240 2.05 1,130 7 1,323 93 Massachusetts 1,275 2.10 1,162 7 1,360 96 Michigan 1,686 2.78 1,536 10 1,798 127
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.txt
  • Island 9.40 - 9.84 - 9.81 - 16.92 - 16.92 - 16.92 - South Carolina 9.54 10.60 9.89 11.92 9.80 12.26 18.76 - 18.18 - 17.79 - South Dakota 7.35 17.56 8.08 18.53 7.91 20.71 12.56 52.64 12.18 65.43 19.58 62.53 Tennessee 9.34 - 9.53 - 9.48 - 19.18 - 18.46 - 17.86 - Texas 8.77 2.46 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 19.35 19.00 18.99 19.00 19.11 - Utah 9.89 7.69 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 12.40 18.03 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 Vermont 9.72 - 9.72 - 9.82 - 14.22 - 14.10 - 14.08 - Virgin Islands - - - - 11.43 - - - - - 16.76 - Virginia 9.24 - 9.12 - 9.18 - 18.63 - 18.73 - 23.85 - Washington
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • LOGAN TEL. COOP., INC. 0.15 -4.69 5.07 0.86 260414 A MOUNTAIN RURAL TEL. COOP. CORP., INC. 29.80 -0.15 29.99 INFINITE 260415 C PEOPLES RURAL TEL. COOP. CORP. 13.64 -0.67 14.41 27.16 260417 A SALEM TEL. CO. 25.49 -2.92 29.27 INFINITE 260418 C SOUTH CENTRAL RURAL TEL. COOP. CORP., INC. 10.35 -0.75 11.19 21.64 260419 A THACKER/GRIGSBY TEL. CO., INC. 10.80 -1.94 12.99 103.96 260421 C WEST KY. RURAL TEL. COOP. CORP., INC. 3.94 -2.10 6.17 6.59 265061 C CINCINNATI BELL-KY -1.17 -2.81 1.69 0.00 265182 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-KY -1.03 -4.93 4.11 94.14 269690 C KENTUCKY ALLTEL, INC. - LEXINGTON -9.35 -3.75 -5.82 -83.50 269691 C KENTUCKY ALLTEL, INC. - LONDON -3.74 -0.55 -3.21 -100.00 LOUISIANA TOTAL -0.01 -5.02 5.27 -2.15
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • Minute) 1 Rates Effective from 7/1/06-06/30/07 Year 2005 Minutes of Use Carrier (Millions) Common Line per Company Originating Access Local Minute 2 OriginatingTerminatingSwitching ALLTEL (KY & NE) 0.00¢ 0.00¢ 0.55¢ 0.31¢ 1.75¢ 596 938 2,083 BellSouth 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.33 1.54 20,492 66,617 57,115 CenturyTel 5 0.16 0.00 0.51 0.31 1.86 409 1,488 1,897 Cincinnati Bell 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.37 1.94 651 2,097 2,750 Citizens 0.15 0.00 0.50 0.45 2.10 1,304 4,744 6,049 Hawaiian Telecom 0.00 0.00 0.82 0.15 1.99 365 1,071 1,525 Iowa Telecom 0.00 0.00 1.55 0.66 4.53 297 349 647 Qwest 0.00 0.00 0.68 0.16 1.72 14,059 26,119 40,322 SBC 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.21 1.34 50,453 51,797 109,030 Sprint 0.00 0.00 0.73 0.15 1.81 5,197 20,146 22,856 Valor
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277103A7.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277103A7.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277103A7.txt
  • primary results are based on a random sample of 77 WONUMS (FRNS), where twelve non-random substitutes are deleted from the sample of 89 observations. The estimates from this random sample do not contain substitution errors. For this random sample of 77 observations, the estimated erroneous payment rate is 20.64 percent. The lower limit of a 90 percent confidence interval is 1.94 percent, and the upper limit of this 90 percent confidence the interval is 39.35 percent. The magnitude of the erroneous payment rate, however, suggests significant problems in the administration of the program. Non-compliance was found on assertions B1, B2, B4, C3, C4, C5, C6, D1, and D2 of Table 1. For the remaining assertions of Table 1, there was 100
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • Delaware 173 0.30 159 1 189 15 District of Columbia 350 0.61 322 3 382 30 Florida 3,857 6.70 3,549 28 4,206 328 Georgia 2,169 3.77 1,995 16 2,365 185 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 253 0.44 233 2 276 22 Idaho 243 0.42 224 2 265 21 Illinois 2,183 3.79 2,009 16 2,380 186 Indiana 1,118 1.94 1,029 8 1,219 95 Iowa 487 0.85 448 3 531 41 Kansas 489 0.85 450 4 533 42 Kentucky 878 1.53 808 6 957 75 Louisiana 970 1.69 893 7 1,058 83 Maine 307 0.53 283 2 335 26 Maryland 1,200 2.09 1,105 9 1,309 102 Massachusetts 1,231 2.14 1,133 9 1,342 105 Michigan 1,637 2.84 1,506 12 1,785 139
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A3.txt
  • Delaware 173 0.30 159 1 189 15 District of Columbia 350 0.61 322 3 382 30 Florida 3,857 6.70 3,549 28 4,206 328 Georgia 2,169 3.77 1,995 16 2,365 185 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 253 0.44 233 2 276 22 Idaho 243 0.42 224 2 265 21 Illinois 2,183 3.79 2,009 16 2,380 186 Indiana 1,118 1.94 1,029 8 1,219 95 Iowa 487 0.85 448 3 531 41 Kansas 489 0.85 450 4 533 42 Kentucky 878 1.53 808 6 957 75 Louisiana 970 1.69 893 7 1,058 83 Maine 307 0.53 283 2 335 26 Maryland 1,200 2.09 1,105 9 1,309 102 Massachusetts 1,231 2.14 1,133 9 1,342 105 Michigan 1,637 2.84 1,506 12 1,785 139
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.txt
  • - Rhode Island 9.83 - 9.88 - 9.89 - 16.92 - 16.92 - 12.86 - South Carolina 9.89 11.92 9.91 12.26 9.86 12.86 18.18 - 17.76 - 17.81 - South Dakota 8.08 18.53 7.91 20.71 8.37 21.76 12.18 65.43 19.58 62.53 20.46 64.01 Tennessee 9.53 - 9.49 - 9.48 - 18.46 - 17.86 - 18.67 - Texas 8.93 0.98 8.92 1.94 8.96 3.13 18.98 19.00 18.67 - 20.21 - Utah 9.92 11.84 9.86 9.94 9.82 10.06 20.60 64.65 13.64 25.91 12.90 29.29 Vermont 9.72 - 9.81 - 9.96 - 14.10 - 14.07 - 13.94 - Virgin Islands - - 11.41 - 11.90 - - - 13.53 - 13.79 - Virginia 9.12 - 9.25 - 9.15 - 18.73 - 24.28 - 18.09
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • 341091 C WOODHULL TELEPHONE COMPANY 1.84 -6.07 8.42 22.86 341092 A STELLE TEL. CO. 23.17 0.00 23.17 54.98 341093 C YATES CITY TEL. CO. -18.14 -3.85 -14.86 -42.98 341183 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF IL DBA FRONTIER COMM OF IL -6.26 -4.60 -1.74 0.00 343035 C VERIZON SOUTH INC.-IL (ALLTEL) -2.00 -6.70 5.03 0.00 345070 C ILLINOIS BELL TEL. CO. -1.94 -5.19 3.42 0.00 TOTAL INDIANA 2.53 -5.11 8.05 23.12 320742 C BLOOMINGDALE HOME TEL. CO., INC. 39.26 -2.20 42.39 71.20 320744 A CAMDEN TEL. CO., INC.-IN 8.01 -2.62 10.92 37.70 320747 C CENTURYTEL OF CENTRAL INDIANA, INC. 2.52 -3.57 6.31 7.07 320750 A FRONTIER COMM. OF INDIANA, INC. -2.91 -4.75 1.93 -54.22 320751 A CITIZENS TEL. CORP.-WARREN 2.14 -1.91 4.12
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.txt
  • regulation. 7 - 28 2005 Minutes of Use Carrier (Millions) Common Line per Company Originating Access CCL CCL Local Minute** Originating Terminating Switching ALLTEL (KY & NE) 0.00¢ 0.00¢ 0.55¢ 0.31¢ 1.75¢ 596 938 2,083 BellSouth 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.33 1.54 20,492 66,617 57,115 CenturyTel # 0.16 0.00 0.51 0.31 1.86 409 1,488 1,897 Cincinnati Bell 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.37 1.94 651 2,097 2,750 Citizens 0.15 0.00 0.50 0.45 2.10 1,304 4,744 6,049 Hawaiian Telecom 0.00 0.00 0.82 0.15 1.99 365 1,071 1,525 Iowa Telecom 0.00 0.00 1.55 0.66 4.53 297 349 647 Qwest 0.00 0.00 0.68 0.16 1.72 14,059 26,119 40,322 AT&T 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.21 1.34 50,453 51,797 109,030 Sprint 0.00 0.00 0.73 0.15 1.81 5,197 20,146 22,856 Valor
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • 990 1,000 923 988 946 1,031 971 2005 1,048 1,055 966 1,035 1,000 1,085 1,047 2006 1,087 1,091 1,038 1,051 998 1,167 1,081 1980 1.94% 1.94% 1.95% 1.89% 2.09% 1.78% 1981 2.05 2.05 2.10 2.04 2.14 1.90 1982 2.08 2.08 2.07 2.01 2.09 2.16 1983 2.11 2.11 2.15 2.01 2.28 1.95 1984 1.98 1.98 1.97% 2.01 1.92 2.06 1.89 1985 1.94 1.93 1.98 2.01 1.85 1.97 1.93 1986 1.97 1.95 2.16 1.89 1.96 2.12 1.87 1987 2.04 2.01 2.32 2.02 2.02 2.17 1.95 1988 2.07 2.04 2.31 1.99 2.01 2.21 2.03 1989 2.04 2.02 2.19 2.02 2.04 2.18 1.87 1990 2.09 2.07 2.24 2.08 2.11 2.28 1.88 1991 2.09 2.04 2.42 2.01 2.15 2.20 1.95 1992 2.09 2.06 2.29 2.04 2.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • Delaware 162 0.29 144 0 171 13 District of Columbia 310 0.56 276 1 328 26 Florida 3,776 6.76 3,356 7 3,986 314 Georgia 2,102 3.76 1,868 4 2,219 175 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 200 0.36 177 0 211 17 Idaho 242 0.43 215 0 256 20 Illinois 2,180 3.90 1,937 4 2,301 181 Indiana 1,087 1.94 966 2 1,147 90 Iowa 499 0.89 443 1 527 41 Kansas 484 0.87 430 1 511 40 Kentucky 812 1.45 721 1 857 67 Louisiana 955 1.71 849 2 1,008 79 Maine 300 0.54 266 1 317 25 Maryland 1,138 2.04 1,012 2 1,202 95 Massachusetts 1,173 2.10 1,043 2 1,239 98 Michigan 1,612 2.88 1,432 3 1,701 134
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A13.pdf
  • 11 - 13 Table 11.6 Average Net Investment ($000) - 2007 Study Area State Code Subject to Separations Interstate Intrastate Percent Interstate Percent Rate of Return Verizon New England - New Hampshire NH $540,190 $354,706 $179,868 33.30 (6.04) Verizon New Jersey NJ 1,051,342 335,755 866,590 82.43 33.41 Embarq - United Telephone Company of New Jersey NJ 143,565 117,597 26,719 18.61 (1.94) Qwest - New Mexico NM 415,402 313,529 116,194 27.97 8.08 Windstream/Valor Telecom. of Texas - New Mexico 1 NM 32,158 18,632 13,783 42.86 64.24 Windstream/Valor Telecom. of Texas - New Mexico 2 NM 39,701 26,607 13,314 33.54 12.78 Citizens Telecom. of New York - Red Hook NY 16,099 11,789 4,310 26.77 29.31 Citizens Telecom. of New York - Upstate NY
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A3.pdf
  • Delaware 162 0.29 144 0 171 13 District of Columbia 310 0.56 276 1 328 26 Florida 3,776 6.76 3,356 7 3,986 314 Georgia 2,102 3.76 1,868 4 2,219 175 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 200 0.36 177 0 211 17 Idaho 242 0.43 215 0 256 20 Illinois 2,180 3.90 1,937 4 2,301 181 Indiana 1,087 1.94 966 2 1,147 90 Iowa 499 0.89 443 1 527 41 Kansas 484 0.87 430 1 511 40 Kentucky 812 1.45 721 1 857 67 Louisiana 955 1.71 849 2 1,008 79 Maine 300 0.54 266 1 317 25 Maryland 1,138 2.04 1,012 2 1,202 95 Massachusetts 1,173 2.10 1,043 2 1,239 98 Michigan 1,612 2.88 1,432 3 1,701 134
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A4.pdf
  • - 21.24 - Rhode Island 9.88 - 9.89 - 9.89 - 16.92 - 12.86 - 3.62 - South Carolina 9.91 12.26 9.86 12.86 9.77 13.14 17.76 - 17.81 - 19.72 - South Dakota 7.91 20.71 8.37 21.76 8.34 21.66 19.58 62.53 20.46 64.01 13.49 63.85 Tennessee 9.49 - 9.47 - 9.62 - 17.86 - 18.67 - 23.24 - Texas 8.92 1.94 8.96 3.16 9.07 2.84 18.67 - 20.21 - 20.66 18.04 Utah 9.86 9.94 9.81 10.06 9.89 15.76 13.64 25.91 12.90 29.29 13.24 20.82 Vermont 9.81 - 9.96 - 9.98 - 14.07 - 13.94 - 13.86 - Virgin Islands 11.41 - 11.95 - 5.07 - 13.53 - 11.58 - 19.00 - Virginia 9.25 - 9.15 - 9.11 - 24.28 - 18.09
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • 401720 C CENTURYTEL OF REDFIELD, INC. -1.24 -6.68 5.83 1.59 401721 C RICE BELT TEL. CO.,INC. -8.59 -7.51 -1.17 -12.39 401722 A E. RITTER TELEPHONE COMPANY -0.47 -4.21 3.90 2.20 401724 C SOUTHWEST ARKANSAS TEL. COOP. INC. 5.19 -3.70 9.23 13.26 401726 C TRI-COUNTY TEL. CO. INC.-AR 6.59 -1.50 8.21 11.40 401727 C CENTURYTEL OF SOUTH ARKANSAS, INC. -4.12 -5.95 1.94 -4.73 401729 C WALNUT HILL TELEPHONE COMPANY 3.12 -4.77 8.29 6.48 401733 C YELCOT TEL. CO.,INC. -0.01 -2.82 2.89 -0.19 401734 C ARKWEST COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 2.38 -2.58 5.09 6.12 403031 C SCOTT COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY -0.98 1.60 -2.54 -2.92 405211 C SOUTHWESTERN BELL-ARKANSAS 1.04 -5.14 6.51 0.00 TOTAL CALIFORNIA 0.86 -4.72 5.85 3.90 542301 C CALAVERAS TELEPHONE COMPANY 6.07 0.45
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • 2,969,742 99.9 1.00 Michigan 4,154,613 96.1 1.04 Minnesota 2,258,483 69.8 1.43 Mississippi 1,117,195 92.8 1.08 Missouri 2,759,571 90.1 1.11 Montana 417,198 65.8 1.52 Nebraska 679,178 77.7 1.29 Nevada 1,077,677 95.4 1.05 New Hampshire 617,676 92.5 1.08 New Jersey 4,516,948 99.8 1.00 New Mexico 822,959 84.3 1.19 New York 8,304,253 96.4 1.04 North Carolina 3,860,991 89.4 1.12 North Dakota 284,695 51.5 1.94 N. Mariana Islands 18,719 0.0 NA Ohio 4,924,217 94.9 1.05 Oklahoma 1,432,001 79.9 1.25 Oregon 1,587,119 91.3 1.09 Pennsylvania 6,108,671 95.5 1.05 Puerto Rico 924,692 100.0 1.00 Rhode Island 348,325 100.0 1.00 South Carolina 1,839,847 71.7 1.40 South Dakota 283,872 57.9 1.73 Tennessee 2,617,191 85.2 1.17 Texas 9,692,891 92.2 1.08 Utah 920,272 91.3 1.10 Vermont 363,274 84.2 1.19 Virginia 3,611,657
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.txt
  • 2,969,742 99.9 1.00 Michigan 4,154,613 96.1 1.04 Minnesota 2,258,483 69.8 1.43 Mississippi 1,117,195 92.8 1.08 Missouri 2,759,571 90.1 1.11 Montana 417,198 65.8 1.52 Nebraska 679,178 77.7 1.29 Nevada 1,077,677 95.4 1.05 New Hampshire 617,676 92.5 1.08 New Jersey 4,516,948 99.8 1.00 New Mexico 822,959 84.3 1.19 New York 8,304,253 96.4 1.04 North Carolina 3,860,991 89.4 1.12 North Dakota 284,695 51.5 1.94 N. Mariana Islands 18,719 0.0 NA Ohio 4,924,217 94.9 1.05 Oklahoma 1,432,001 79.9 1.25 Oregon 1,587,119 91.3 1.09 Pennsylvania 6,108,671 95.5 1.05 Puerto Rico 924,692 100.0 1.00 Rhode Island 348,325 100.0 1.00 South Carolina 1,839,847 71.7 1.40 South Dakota 283,872 57.9 1.73 Tennessee 2,617,191 85.2 1.17 Texas 9,692,891 92.2 1.08 Utah 920,272 91.3 1.10 Vermont 363,274 84.2 1.19 Virginia 3,611,657
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • COMM. DBA COALFIELDS TEL. CO. 6.10 -3.17 9.57 INFINITE 260411 C LESLIE COUNTY TEL. CO., INC. -7.47 -1.38 -6.18 -52.29 260412 A LEWISPORT TEL. CO., INC. 1.54 -3.38 5.09 -3.42 260413 C LOGAN TEL. COOP., INC. -4.13 -3.10 -1.06 -10.25 260414 A MOUNTAIN RURAL TEL. COOP. CORP., INC. 8.12 -2.13 10.47 INFINITE 260415 C PEOPLES RURAL TEL. COOP. CORP. 9.87 -1.94 12.05 18.50 260417 A SALEM TEL. CO. 6.03 -2.75 9.03 INFINITE 260418 C SOUTH CENTRAL RURAL TEL. COOP. CORP., INC. -0.96 -0.74 -0.22 -9.59 260419 A THACKER/GRIGSBY TEL. CO., INC. 1.08 -3.67 4.93 -5.91 260421 C WEST KY. RURAL TEL. COOP. CORP., INC. 4.03 -5.07 9.59 8.66 265061 C CINCINNATI BELL-KY -11.44 -12.57 1.28 0.00 265182 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-KY
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301505A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301505A1.txt
  • 1,863 1,878 1,026 1,079 4,861 4,491 Operating income 806 965 20,404 23,063 793 721 282 305 1,504 1,633 Interest Expense 444 1,399 3,507 3,390 213 202 155 140 432 405 Income Taxes 307 139 6,253 7,036 201 194 57 74 392 463 Net Income (Loss) 183 -250 11,951 12,867 418 366 73 103 683 769 Earnings per Share N/A - 1.94 2.16 3.72 3.56 0.24 0.38 4.50 5.22 Dividends per Share 0.13 - 1.47 1.61 0.26 2.17 - - 2.38 2.75 Average Shares Outstanding (millions) N/A - 6,170 5,958 113 103 257 243 154 147 Capital Expenditures N/A 364 17,717 19,676 326 287 234 231 829 686 Property, Plant and Equipment - Net 10,633 4,990 95,890 99,088 3,108 2,896 934 1,044
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
  • 0.43 480 0.19 1,025,583 0.32 American Samoa 11 0.01 0 0.00 0 0.02 20 0.01 19,087 0.01 Arizona 1,943 1.56 1,218 2.78 13 3.26 4,936 1.93 6,058,782 1.92 Arkansas 1,069 0.86 223 0.51 2 0.58 2,446 0.96 3,098,534 0.98 California 17,149 13.76 4,536 10.37 66 16.36 31,946 12.49 31,440,776 9.96 Colorado 1,973 1.58 838 1.91 8 2.02 4,066 1.59 6,116,346 1.94 Connecticut 1,632 1.31 625 1.43 3 0.68 2,959 1.16 4,795,494 1.52 Delaware 396 0.32 164 0.37 1 0.25 775 0.30 1,391,815 0.44 District of Columbia 788 0.63 182 0.42 0 0.12 1,047 0.41 1,719,594 0.54 Florida 7,932 6.37 2,690 6.15 25 6.25 15,809 6.18 22,233,772 7.04 Georgia 3,675 2.95 1,157 2.65 13 3.21 8,142 3.18 10,993,228 3.48 Guam 62 0.05
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A3.txt
  • 0.43 480 0.19 1,025,583 0.32 American Samoa 11 0.01 0 0.00 0 0.02 20 0.01 19,087 0.01 Arizona 1,943 1.56 1,218 2.78 13 3.26 4,936 1.93 6,058,782 1.92 Arkansas 1,069 0.86 223 0.51 2 0.58 2,446 0.96 3,098,534 0.98 California 17,149 13.76 4,536 10.37 66 16.36 31,946 12.49 31,440,776 9.96 Colorado 1,973 1.58 838 1.91 8 2.02 4,066 1.59 6,116,346 1.94 Connecticut 1,632 1.31 625 1.43 3 0.68 2,959 1.16 4,795,494 1.52 Delaware 396 0.32 164 0.37 1 0.25 775 0.30 1,391,815 0.44 District of Columbia 788 0.63 182 0.42 0 0.12 1,047 0.41 1,719,594 0.54 Florida 7,932 6.37 2,690 6.15 25 6.25 15,809 6.18 22,233,772 7.04 Georgia 3,675 2.95 1,157 2.65 13 3.21 8,142 3.18 10,993,228 3.48 Guam 62 0.05
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.txt
  • 17.52 340984 C CASS TEL CO -0.58 -7.53 7.51 -2.01 340990 A CLARKSVILLE MUTUAL 16.41 -4.80 22.28 69.72 340993 A CROSSVILLE TEL CO 6.20 -9.82 17.76 51.84 340998 A FRONTIER-DEPUE 12.43 -2.03 14.77 45.85 341003 C EGYPTIAN COOP ASSN -10.11 -2.75 -7.57 -27.59 341004 C EL PASO TEL CO -10.82 -9.58 -1.36 0.00 341009 C C-R TEL CO -2.35 -0.42 -1.94 -27.05 341011 C FRONTIER OF LAKESIDE -5.67 -8.65 3.26 0.00 341012 C FLAT ROCK TEL CO-OP -8.10 -3.32 -4.95 0.00 341015 C FRONTIER NORTH-IL -3.61 -10.39 7.56 0.00 341016 A GENESEO TEL CO -8.80 -4.15 -4.86 0.00 341017 A GLASFORD TEL CO 2.02 -2.04 4.15 -70.20 341020 C GRAFTON TEL CO -5.44 -6.63 1.27 -22.54 341021 A GRANDVIEW MUTUAL TEL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.txt
  • 13.25 7.99 3.49 1.75 9.74 13.23 New Mexico 8.25 3.23 1.61 9.86 13.09 8.25 3.50 1.75 10.00 13.50 8.25 3.30 1.65 9.90 13.20 New York 8.01 3.30 1.65 9.65 12.95 8.10 3.49 1.75 9.85 13.34 8.07 3.44 1.72 9.79 13.23 North Carolina 7.86 3.50 1.75 9.61 13.11 8.05 3.50 1.75 9.80 13.30 8.01 3.50 1.75 9.76 13.26 North Dakota 8.25 1.94 0.97 9.22 11.17 8.25 2.89 1.44 9.70 12.58 8.25 1.99 0.99 9.25 11.23 N. Mariana Islands 8.25 0.00 0.00 8.25 8.25 8.26 0.00 0.00 8.26 8.26 8.25 0.00 0.00 8.25 8.25 Ohio 7.27 3.49 1.75 9.02 12.51 7.38 3.50 1.75 9.13 12.63 7.34 3.50 1.75 9.09 12.58 Oklahoma 7.41 0.39 0.20 7.60 8.00 7.14 0.95 0.48 7.62 8.57 7.21 0.81
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.txt
  • and then excluding those I-codes that could have been discovered by a properly conducted acceptance test, Verizon shows that the gap between competitive LECs and retail I-code rate in September and November 2000 is eliminated and reduced to less than one percent in October 2000. The adjusted rate is 1.43 percent for September 2000, 4.04 percent for October 2000 and 1.94 percent for November 2000 compared to the weighted average during this period of 2.36 percent for competitive LECs and 3.30 percent for Verizon. See Verizon Massachusetts II Lacouture/Ruesterholz Decl. at para. 96 and Attach. AA. See Rhythms Massachusetts II Williams Decl. para. 26; Covad Clancy Decl. para. 10-23; see also USISPA Massachusetts II Reply at 8. The Department of Justice
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.txt
  • 9.18 5.11 24.79 8.00 1b,2a,3a,4a PR-2-06 Average Interval Completed - DS0 3.00 3.07 3.28 1.55 3.04 2.95 6.82 4.00 4a,1x PR-2-07 Average Interval Completed - DS1 16.19 7.44 18.04 2.75 13.40 4.00 25.02 NA 1a,2a,3a PR-2-08 Average Interval Completed - DS3 31.80 NA 16.88 NA 20.33 NA 50.49 NA PR-4-01 % Missed Appointment - Verizon - Total 2.39 0.65 6.60 1.94 4.30 0.88 2.30 0.00 4b PR-4-01 % Missed Appointment - Verizon - DS0 1.66 1.41 1.61 1.67 1.75 1.56 1.39 0.00 4a,2n PR-4-01 % Missed Appointment - Verizon - DS1 4.59 0.00 3.69 0.00 1.18 0.00 30.51 NA 1b,2a,3a PR-4-01 % Missed Appointment - Verizon - DS3 0.00 NA 8.33 NA 0.00 NA 33.67 NA PR-4-01 % Missed Appointment -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.txt
  • Orders Jeopardized Provisioning B - 8 CLEC Result P*B CLEC Result P*B CLEC Result P*B CLEC Result P*B CLEC Result P*B Notes Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-330 California Performance Metric Data Sept. 2002 August 2002 Metric Name and Disaggregation Metric Number July 2002 May 2002 June 2002 5 - 522200Resale Centrex 0.00 1.15 0.57 1.90 0.00 1.69 0.89 1.98 0.00 1.94 5 - 522900UNE (8db and 5.5db) field wk/no field wk 2.19 2.51 0.46 2.53 0.50 2.38 0.43 2.13 0.50 2.23 5 - 523300UNE Loop 2w Dig IDSL capable field wk/no field wk 4.96 5.76 7.7110.79 6.79 5.80 9.08 5.27 6.33 4.38 5 - 523500UNE Loop 2w Dig xDSL capable field wk/no field wk 2.06 n/a 2.40 n/a 2.49 n/a 2.24
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.txt
  • In/FL (hours) 18.22 18.66 14.99 19.98 14.87 2,4,5 B.2.22.13.2.12W Analog Loop w/LNP Non- Design/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (hours) 30.66 1 B.2.22.14.1.1Other Design/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (hours) 18.27 40.57 3,5 B.2.22.15.1.1Other Non-Design/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (hours) 21.76 21.29 18.87 19.55 15.52 4,5 B.2.22.17.1.1LNP (Standalone)/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (hours) 0.23 7.01 43.55 23.80 2,3,4,5 B.2.22.17.1.2LNP (Standalone)/<10 circuits/Non- Dispatch/FL (hours) 4.12 4.34 4.24 3.16 1.80 B.2.22.17.2.2LNP (Standalone)/>=10 circuits/Non- Dispatch/FL (hours) 0.69 1.94 2.30 4.31 0.62 4,5 B.2.22.18.1.1Digital Loop < DS1/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (hours) 32.20 29.48 27.96 35.60 42.39 B - 40 Metric Metric Name [SQM Number] May June July August September Number and Disaggregation BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC Notes Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-331 Florida Performance Metric Data B.2.22.19.1.1Digital Loop >= DS1/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (hours) 55.06 37.91 76.16
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-63A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-63A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-63A2.txt
  • 20 1,2,4,5 MR-5 - Repeat Trouble Reports MR-5-01-3343 % Repeat Reports within 30 Days 47 42.9 44 100 46 17.65 52 14.29 56 20 1,2,4,5 Special Services - Maintenance MR-2 - Trouble Report Rate MR-2-01-3200 Network Trouble Report Rate 0.3 1.21 0.3 1.89 0.2 1.45 0.2 1.49 0.2 1.62 MR-2-05-3200 % CPE/TOK/FOK Trouble Report Rate 0.4 2.11 0.4 2.84 0.3 1.94 0.3 2.66 0.3 2.63 MR-4 - Trouble Duration Intervals MR-4-01-3200 Mean Time To Repair - Total 8.2 7.82 7.1 7.01 6.9 7.23 7.8 7.45 5 MR-4-04-3200 % Cleared (all troubles) within 24 Hours 95 100 97 97 98 98 97 100 5 MR-4-06-3200 % Out of Service > 4 Hours 67 65 63 59.7 61 61.22 59 72.92 5 MR-4-08-3200
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05M-12A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05M-12A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05M-12A1.txt
  • ORDER Adopted: March 14, 2005 Released: March 15, 2005 This is a ruling on a Joint Request for Adoption of Consent Decree and Termination of Proceeding, filed March 9, 2005, by the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Publix Network Corporation, Customer Attendants, LLC, Revenue Controls Corporation, SignTel, Inc., and Focus Group, LLC, (the ``Publix Companies'') in accordance with sections 1.93 and 1.94 of the Commission's rules [47 C.F.R. §§ 1.93, 1.94]. This proceeding was set for hearing by the Order to Show Cause and Notice of Opportunity for Hearing (``OSC''), 17 FCC Rcd 11487 (2002), released June 19, 2002. Issues were specified to determine whether: (1) the Commission should revoke the operating authority of the Publix Companies; (2) the Publix Companies and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-110A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-110A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-110A1.txt
  • Comments (filed Oct. 31, 2003) at 10. ARINC Comments on 3M's Petition For Reconsideration at 5-6. See 3M Petition at ii, 1-2. ARINC Comments on 3M's Petition For Reconsideration at 5-6. For example, at a height of ten meters, the 20 log (Ht/6) formula requires a 4.44 dB reduction in power, while the 20 log (Ht/8) formula only requires a 1.94 dB reduction, a 2.5 dB increase (or a proportional increase in power of 7/9) permitted under the new formula. See 3M Ex Parte at 9. ARINC Comments on 3 M's Petition For Reconsideration at 7. ARINC Petition at 14. Id. Id. The IEEE is a non-profit, technical professional association of more than 360,000 individual members in approximately 175 countries. It
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-142A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-142A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-142A1.txt
  • on customer experiences with three point-of-contact methods: telephone with a service representative and/or automated response system (``ARS''); walk-in at a retail store; and online Internet connection. For each contact method, processing issues such as problem resolution efficiency and hold-time duration are also measured. The 2006 Wireless Customer Care Study found that wireless customers contact their service provider an average of 1.94 times by phone to resolve an issue or problem, the highest level since measurement of the average problem resolution frequency (``PRF'') rate began in 2000. The average PRF rate was 1.36 in 2000 and has climbed steadily since then at an average annual rate of 14 percent. According to J.D. Power and Associates, the main factors contributing to this increase
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-169A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-169A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-169A1.txt
  • using the generalized method of moments. The first regression differs from the Adelphia Order only in adding TEAM COUNT. Table 1 DBS Penetration and RSN Access Independent Variables Dependent Variable: LN DBS PENETRATION Coefficient z-statistic LN CABLE PRICE 2.11* 2.15 LN CABLE CHANNELS -1.11* -2.61 PHILLY -0.53* -6.59 SANDIEGO -0.47* -5.52 CHARLOTTE -0.21 -1.45 KEYDMA 0.21* 3.29 TEAM COUNT -0.03 -1.94 DBSOVERAIR -0.09 -1.43 CABLECOMP 0.27 1.18 HDTV -0.12 -1.53 INTERNET -0.06 -0.52 LN INCOME -0.29* -2.44 LN MULTIDWELL -0.37* -10.45 LN LATITUDE -0.01 -0.03 CONSTANT -0.73 -0.26 Observations 676 Centered R-Squared 0.26 F-Statistic (14, 661) 40.57 Hansen J Statistic 27.22 * - significant at 95% confidence level Most coefficients change only slightly in terms of statistical significance or magnitude as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-247A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-247A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-247A1.txt
  • income, a substantial fluctuation in net earnings resulting from a moderate change in sales revenue. The estimates of DOL reported in Table 3 are highly suggestive of significant business risk that communications satellite carriers face in their business operations. Table 3 also shows that the communication satellite industry faces a capital intensive cost structure. In column (4), DOL ranges from 1.94 for pre-merger PanAmSat to 3.43 for post-merger Intelsat. DOL viewed as an elasticity coefficient will be 1.00 if the firm incurs no fixed costs and presumably makes no investment in durable capital assets. Because the estimates of DOL are in excess of 1.00, it is shown that the communications satellite industry operates with a capital-intensive cost structure as also shown
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-129A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-129A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-129A1.txt
  • 10.48 380.98 17.78 Panola 23,084 8,949 $15,439 $31,909 $42,917 13.9 28.82 1117.36 75.72 Parmer 9,224 3,046 $14,184 $30,813 $40,346 14.2 10.46 345.43 62.70 Pecos 16,307 5,002 $12,212 $28,033 $37,283 20.5 3.42 105.00 40.11 Polk 46,144 16,983 $15,834 $30,495 $36,930 15.5 43.64 1606.35 89.16 Potter 120,918 43,402 $14,947 $29,492 $36,988 22.5 132.99 4773.43 6.92 Presidio 7,467 2,564 $9,558 $19,860 $27,490 21.3 1.94 66.50 53.23 Real 2,875 1,162 $14,321 $25,118 $31,677 18.8 4.11 165.95 100.00 Red River 12,955 5,264 $15,058 $27,558 $32,902 18.8 12.34 501.23 76.89 Reeves 11,062 3,449 $10,811 $23,306 $31,057 27.5 4.20 130.85 24.21 Roberts 833 343 $20,923 $44,792 $63,265 6.7 0.90 37.09 100.00 Robertson 15,693 6,018 $14,714 $28,886 $37,219 20.5 18.36 704.25 76.49 Sabine 10,062 4,319 $15,821 $27,198 $33,443 15.6
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-56A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-56A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-56A1.txt
  • subscribership to telephone service continues to increase. Furthermore, average consumer expenditures on telephone service as a percentage of total household expenditures have remained relatively stable over time - at approximately two percent - even though consumers purchase more different types of telephone services than they did decades ago. Data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) indicate that consumers spent 1.94 percent of their household expenditures on telephone service in 1980 and 2.23 percent in 2008. Moreover, consumers are buying more telephone services than they did in 1980. An alternative measure of consumer expenditures shows that telephone service as a percentage of all goods and services accounted for 1.6 percent of consumer expenditures in both 1980 and 2005. Further, consumers now
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.txt
  • AS2 AS7 AS8 AS13 AS14 AS15 AS16 AS17 AS18 AS21 AS22 Loops 0.885*** 0.964*** 1.167*** 1.291*** 0.542*** 0.725*** 0.919*** 0.8 76*** 0.892*** 0.834*** 0.785*** 0.769*** (15.99) (14.49) (6.65) (9.05) (6.40) (9.99) (6.50) (8.86) (8.56) (8.32) (13.26) (3.67) Housing_Units_nu -0.32*** -0.43*** -0.519* -0.66*** 0.0594 -0.272** -0.1 85 -0.337** -0.319* -0.216 -0.125 -0.149 (-4.57) (-5.69) (-2.36) (-3.70) (0.61) (-2.96) (-1.05) (-2.62) (-2.43) (-1.94) (-1.51) (-0.55) Housing_Units_uc 0.166** 0.194** 0.222 0.250 0.0353 0.0261 0.0476 0.223 0.161 0.174 0.241* 0.151 (2.79) (2.63) (0.85) (0.86) (0.30) (0.26) (0.30) (1.42) (1.30) (1.61) ( 1.96) (0.58) Housing_Units_ua -0.0356 0.0895 0.143 -0.0056 0.103 -0.0519 -0.00828 -0. 189 -0.0520 0.191 -0.230* -0.454 (-0.52) (0.66) (0.35) (-0.01) (0.52) (-0.40) (-0.05) (-0.80) (-0.36) (1 .02) (-2.38) (-1.11) Land_Area_nu 0.163*** 0.138*** 0.218** 0.215*
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
  • ­ EDI 0.69 0 0 0.83 0 PO-1-08-6030 % Timeouts ­ CORBA 0 0 0 0 0 PO-1-08-6050 % Timeouts - Web GUI 0.4 0.24 0.11 0 0.04 Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-118 B-5 Metric Metric September October November December January Notes Number Name VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC PO-1-09-6020 Parsed CSR ­ EDI 1.41 1.94 1.31 1.81 1.33 1.69 1.32 2.08 1.42 1.87 b,e PO-1-09-6030 Parsed CSR ­ CORBA 1.41 0.35 1.31 0.26 1.33 0.26 1.32 0.36 1.42 0.32 a,b,c,d,e PO-2 - OSS Interface Availability PO-2-01-6020 OSS Interf. Avail. ­ Total ­ EDI 99.97 99.97 a,b PO-2-01-6030 OSS Interf. Avail. ­ Total ­ CORBA 99.9 99.95 a,b PO-2-01-6040 OSS Interf. Avail. ­ Total ­ Maint.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DOC-244194A1.html
  • the Act19 and section 54.706 of the Commission's rules,20 had willfully and repeatedly failed to make TRS Fund contributions in violation of section 64.604(c)(5)(iii)(A) of the Commission's rules,21 and had willfully and repeatedly failed to file Telecommunications Reporting Worksheets in a timely manner in violation of sections 54.711 of the Commission's rules.22 7. On January 28, 2004, pursuant to section 1.94(a) of the Commission's Rules,23 the Bureau informed the presiding officer of the initiation of the negotiations that lead to this Consent Decree. Pursuant to section 1.93(b) of the Commission's rules,24 the Bureau negotiated this Consent Decree to secure future compliance with sections 214, 254, and 258 of the Act25 and related Commission rules in exchange for prompt disposition of the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/FCC-05M-12A1.html
  • ORDER Adopted: March 14, 2005 Released: March 15, 2005 This is a ruling on a Joint Request for Adoption of Consent Decree and Termination of Proceeding, filed March 9, 2005, by the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Publix Network Corporation, Customer Attendants, LLC, Revenue Controls Corporation, SignTel, Inc., and Focus Group, LLC, (the ``Publix Companies'') in accordance with sections 1.93 and 1.94 of the Commission's rules [47 C.F.R. 1.93, 1.94].1 This proceeding was set for hearing by the Order to Show Cause and Notice of Opportunity for Hearing (``OSC''), 17 FCC Rcd 11487 (2002), released June 19, 2002. Issues were specified to determine whether: (1) the Commission should revoke the operating authority of the Publix Companies; (2) the Publix Companies and the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-04-437A2.html
  • and Notice ) NAL/Acct. No. 200332170002 of ) FRN: 0007179054 Opportunity for Hearing ) CONSENT ORDER Issued: February 18, 2004 Released: February 20, 2004 This is a ruling on Joint Request for Adoption of Consent Decree and Termination of Proceeding, filed on February 17, 2004, by the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Business Options, Inc. (``BOI'') in accordance with 1.93 and 1.94 of the Commission's rules [47 C.F.R. 1.93, 1.94].1 This proceeding was set for hearing by Order to Show Cause and Notice of Opportunity for Hearing, 18 F.C.C. Rcd 6881, released April 7, 2003 (``OSC''). Issues were specified to determine whether BOI had made misrepresentations or engaged in lack of candor (Issue a); to determine whether BOI had changed consumers' preferred
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.txt
  • and then excluding those I-codes that could have been discovered by a properly conducted acceptance test, Verizon shows that the gap between competitive LECs and retail I-code rate in September and November 2000 is eliminated and reduced to less than one percent in October 2000. The adjusted rate is 1.43 percent for September 2000, 4.04 percent for October 2000 and 1.94 percent for November 2000 compared to the weighted average during this period of 2.36 percent for competitive LECs and 3.30 percent for Verizon. See Verizon Massachusetts II Lacouture/Ruesterholz Decl. at para. 96 and Attach. AA. See Rhythms Massachusetts II Williams Decl. para. 26; Covad Clancy Decl. para. 10-23; see also USISPA Massachusetts II Reply at 8. The Department of Justice
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2002/fcc02331.pdf
  • In/FL (hours) 18.22 18.66 14.99 19.98 14.87 2,4,5 B.2.22.13.2.12W Analog Loop w/LNP Non- Design/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (hours) 30.66 1 B.2.22.14.1.1Other Design/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (hours) 18.27 40.57 3,5 B.2.22.15.1.1Other Non-Design/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (hours) 21.76 21.29 18.87 19.55 15.52 4,5 B.2.22.17.1.1LNP (Standalone)/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (hours) 0.23 7.01 43.55 23.80 2,3,4,5 B.2.22.17.1.2LNP (Standalone)/<10 circuits/Non- Dispatch/FL (hours) 4.12 4.34 4.24 3.16 1.80 B.2.22.17.2.2LNP (Standalone)/>=10 circuits/Non- Dispatch/FL (hours) 0.69 1.94 2.30 4.31 0.62 4,5 B.2.22.18.1.1Digital Loop < DS1/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (hours) 32.20 29.48 27.96 35.60 42.39 B - 40 Metric Metric Name [SQM Number] May June July August September Number and Disaggregation BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC Notes Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-331 Florida Performance Metric Data B.2.22.19.1.1Digital Loop >= DS1/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (hours) 55.06 37.91 76.16
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • Line in Urban Areas (As of October 15) 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Monthly Representative Service Charge* $37.19 $36.74 $36.92 $37.18 $37.36 $36.98 $37.34 $36.98 $37.25 $37.30 $36.99 $36.48 $36.79 Subscriber Line Charges 4.87 4.98 4.85 4.78 5.36 5.45 5.61 5.50 5.75 5.82 6.92 6.95 6.68 Extra for Touch-Tone Service 2.65 2.49 1.94 1.82 1.67 1.23 1.00 0.85 0.41 0.33 0.26 0.20 0.19 Taxes, 911 and Other Charges 5.18 5.23 5.13 5.29 5.39 5.37 5.59 5.66 5.81 6.11 5.95 5.82 5.77 Total Monthly Charge $49.89 $49.44 $48.84 $49.08 $49.78 $49.04 $49.54 $49.00 $49.22 $49.56 $50.12 $49.45 $49.43 Monthly Charge for Flat-Rate Service $44.84 $44.75 $44.35 $44.44 $44.85 $44.88 $45.31 $45.33 $44.71 $45.05 $43.78
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • (As of October 15, 2002) 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Monthly Representative Service Charge* $37.19 $36.74 $36.92 $37.18 $37.36 $36.98 $37.34 $36.98 $37.25 $37.30 $36.99 $36.48 $37.76 $36.72 Subscriber Line Charges 4.87 4.98 4.85 4.78 5.36 5.45 5.61 5.50 5.75 5.82 6.92 6.95 6.62 6.40 Extra for Touch-Tone Service 2.65 2.49 1.94 1.82 1.67 1.23 1.00 0.85 0.41 0.33 0.26 0.20 0.19 0.14 Taxes, 911 and Other Charges 5.18 5.23 5.13 5.29 5.39 5.37 5.59 5.66 5.81 6.11 5.95 5.82 6.65 6.67 Total Monthly Charge $49.89 $49.44 $48.84 $49.08 $49.78 $49.04 $49.54 $49.00 $49.22 $49.56 $50.12 $49.45 $51.22 $49.94 Monthly Charge for Flat-Rate Service $44.84 $44.75 $44.35 $44.44 $44.85 $44.88 $45.31 $45.33
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 877 889 790 856 884 891 864 2001 914 927 825 897 914 924 914 2002 957 972 851 952 934 987 936 1980 1.94% 1.94% 1.95% 1.89% 2.09% 1.78% 1981 2.05 2.05 2.10 2.04 2.14 1.90 1982 2.08 2.08 2.07 2.01 2.09 2.16 1983 2.11 2.11 2.15 2.01 2.28 1.95 1984 1.98 1.98 1.97% 2.01 1.92 2.06 1.89 1985 1.94 1.93 1.98 2.01 1.85 1.97 1.93 1986 1.97 1.95 2.16 1.89 1.96 2.12 1.87 1987 2.04 2.01 2.32 2.02 2.02 2.17 1.95 1988 2.07 2.04 2.31 1.99 2.01 2.21 2.03 1989 2.04 2.02 2.19 2.02 2.04 2.18 1.87 1990 2.09 2.07 2.24 2.08 2.11 2.28 1.88 1991 2.09 2.04 2.42 2.01 2.15 2.20 1.95 1992 2.09 2.06 2.29 2.04 2.07
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 914 927 825 897 914 924 914 2002 957 972 851 952 934 987 936 2003 956 967 875 932 917 1,002 941 1980 1.94% 1.94% 1.95% 1.89% 2.09% 1.78% 1981 2.05 2.05 2.10 2.04 2.14 1.90 1982 2.08 2.08 2.07 2.01 2.09 2.16 1983 2.11 2.11 2.15 2.01 2.28 1.95 1984 1.98 1.98 1.97% 2.01 1.92 2.06 1.89 1985 1.94 1.93 1.98 2.01 1.85 1.97 1.93 1986 1.97 1.95 2.16 1.89 1.96 2.12 1.87 1987 2.04 2.01 2.32 2.02 2.02 2.17 1.95 1988 2.07 2.04 2.31 1.99 2.01 2.21 2.03 1989 2.04 2.02 2.19 2.02 2.04 2.18 1.87 1990 2.09 2.07 2.24 2.08 2.11 2.28 1.88 1991 2.09 2.04 2.42 2.01 2.15 2.20 1.95 1992 2.09 2.06 2.29 2.04 2.07
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref97.pdf
  • available, and measured service with 200 same-zone 6 local calls elsewhere. 23 Table 3B Nationwide Averages for a Local Key System Business Line5 Rates as of October 15 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 Representative Service charge6 $37.19 $36.81 $37.03 $37.27 $37.23 $37.01 $36.56 Subscriber Line Charges 4.87 4.98 4.85 4.78 5.32 5.45 5.59 Extra for Touch-tone 2.65 2.49 1.94 1.82 1.75 1.22 1.02 Tax including 911 charges 5.18 5.21 5.12 5.28 5.36 5.35 5.49 Total monthly charge 49.89 49.49 48.94 49.15 49.66 49.03 48.66 # cities offering Unlimited Service 59 56 54 54 54 53 53 Unlimited Service base rate 44.84 44.80 44.40 44.49 44.61 44.96 43.55 Subscriber Line Charges 5.65 5.68 5.55 5.52 6.01 6.16 6.17 Extra for
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • Connection Block Needed 9.55 0.00 24 Table 1.14 Average Local Rates for Businesses with a Key System Line in Urban Areas 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 Monthly Representative Service Charge* $37.19 $36.74 $36.92 $37.18 $37.36 $36.98 $37.34 $36.98 $37.59 Subscriber Line Charges 4.87 4.98 4.85 4.78 5.36 5.45 5.61 5.50 5.73 Extra for Touch-tone 2.65 2.49 1.94 1.82 1.67 1.23 1.00 0.85 0.47 Taxes including 911 Charges 5.18 5.23 5.13 5.29 5.39 5.37 5.59 5.66 5.82 Total Monthly Charge 49.89 49.44 48.84 49.08 49.78 49.04 49.54 49.00 49.62 Monthly Charge for Flat-rate Service $44.84 $44.75 $44.35 $44.44 $44.85 $44.88 $45.31 $45.33 $45.52 Subscriber Line Charges 5.65 5.68 5.55 5.52 6.02 6.16 6.17 6.10 6.59 Extra for Touch-tone
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 9.57 0.00 24 Table 1.14 Average Local Rates for Businesses with a Key System Line in Urban Areas 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 Monthly Representative Service Charge* $37.19 $36.74 $36.92 $37.18 $37.36 $36.98 $37.34 $36.98 $37.25 $37.30 Subscriber Line Charges 4.87 4.98 4.85 4.78 5.36 5.45 5.61 5.50 5.75 5.82 Extra for Touch-tone 2.65 2.49 1.94 1.82 1.67 1.23 1.00 0.85 0.41 0.33 Other 5.18 5.23 5.13 5.29 5.39 5.37 5.59 5.66 5.81 6.11 Total Monthly Charge 49.89 49.44 48.84 49.08 49.78 49.04 49.54 49.00 49.22 49.56 Monthly Charge for Flat-rate Service $44.84 $44.75 $44.35 $44.44 $44.85 $44.88 $45.31 $45.33 $44.71 $45.05 Subscriber Line Charges 5.65 5.68 5.55 5.52 6.02 6.16 6.17 6.10 6.63 7.06 Extra
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-95.pdf
  • 0.46 FLORIDA 5,214 6,635 11,849 5.95 GEORGIA 2,709 3,087 5,796 2.91 HAWAII 373 432 805 0.40 IDAHO 437 363 800 0.40 ILLINOIS 3,507 4,668 8,175 4.11 INDIANA 1,550 2,353 3,903 1.96 IOWA 827 1,089 1,917 0.96 KANSAS 821 1,036 1,857 0.93 KENTUCKY 1,188 1,540 2,729 1.37 LOUISIANA 1,129 1,680 2,809 1.41 MAINE 424 461 886 0.45 MARYLAND 1,779 2,091 3,869 1.94 MASSACHUSETTS 2,457 2,670 5,127 2.58 MICHIGAN 2,265 4,320 6,586 3.31 MINNESOTA 1,373 1,769 3,142 1.58 MISSISSIPPI 727 918 1,645 0.83 MISSOURI 1,684 2,110 3,794 1.91 MONTANA 307 338 646 0.32 NEBRASKA 553 785 1,338 0.67 NEVADA 2,075 1,151 3,226 1.62 NEW HAMPSHIRE 580 425 1,005 0.51 NEW JERSEY 3,618 3,541 7,159 3.60 NEW MEXICO 595 557 1,152 0.58 NEW YORK
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-97.pdf
  • 1,546 2,705 1.44 98.45 99.78 DELAWARE 273 253 527 0.28 98.45 99.75 DIST. OF COLUMBIA 380 451 831 0.44 98.46 99.76 FLORIDA 4,645 6,685 11,330 6.04 98.47 99.69 GEORGIA 2,259 3,339 5,598 2.99 98.47 99.72 HAWAII 286 460 746 0.40 98.48 99.76 IDAHO 356 392 748 0.40 98.46 99.75 ILLINOIS 3,038 5,409 8,446 4.51 98.47 99.70 INDIANA 1,293 2,341 3,634 1.94 98.48 99.71 IOWA 680 1,013 1,693 0.90 98.47 99.71 KANSAS 684 1,059 1,743 0.93 98.47 99.73 KENTUCKY 872 1,411 2,283 1.22 98.47 99.72 LOUISIANA 947 1,708 2,655 1.42 98.48 99.71 MAINE 314 476 790 0.42 98.48 99.82 MARYLAND 1,540 2,324 3,864 2.06 98.47 99.71 MASSACHUSETTS 1,942 2,970 4,912 2.62 98.47 99.75 MICHIGAN 1,948 4,655 6,603 3.52 98.49 99.72 MINNESOTA 1,207
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-99.pdf
  • 0.26 -2,183 -0.15 Vermont 2,389 0.48 1,344 0.27 1,045 0.21 Virginia 3,342 0.06 14,268 0.25 -10,926 -0.19 Washington 13,268 0.29 10,674 0.24 2,594 0.06 West Virginia 1,061 0.09 2,690 0.22 -1,628 -0.13 Wisconsin 12,832 0.31 7,786 0.19 5,046 0.12 Wyoming 4,501 1.26 1,115 0.31 3,386 0.95 United States 378,101 0.17 475,899 0.22 -97,798 -0.04 Guam 1,946 2.09 144 0.15 1,803 1.94 N. Mariana Islands 0 0.00 54 0.18 -54 -0.18 Puerto Rico 91,622 5.90 2,760 0.18 88,861 5.72 Virgin Islands 7,206 8.93 277 0.34 6,929 8.59 Grand Total 1/ $479,134 $0.22 $479,134 $0.22 $0 $0.00 2/ Net flow of funds is positive when payments from USF to carriers exceed contributions to USF. 1/ Grand total includes approximately $258,000 for American Somoa.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend100.pdf
  • 7 TABLE 3.5 SLAMMING COMPLAINTS: INDICES FOR IXCs SERVED 40 OR MORE - CONTINUED (January 1, 1999 Through June 30, 1999) RevenueSlammingRevenue SlammingFigure UsedComplaintSource Carrier Complaints(millions) Index Code* USN Communications 65 $17.5 3.71 2 North American Telephone 58 17.5 3.31 2 Minimum Rate Pricing 344 112.0 3.07 4 RSL COM USA, Inc. 444 183.6 2.42 1 Quest Communications 34 17.5 1.94 2 Equal Net Corporation 31 17.5 1.77 2 Flat Rate Long Distance 65 37.5 1.73 2 Consumer Access 29 17.5 1.66 2 QAI, Inc. 56 37.5 1.49 2 I-Link Communication 22 17.5 1.26 2 Long Distance International, Inc. 38 37.5 1.01 2 Frontier Communications Services 346 538.8 0.64 1 Matrix Telecom 20 37.5 0.53 2 Qwest Communications 648 1,664.2 0.39
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend199.pdf
  • TresCom International) 88,957,638 418,573,684 171,361,442 4.17 PT-1 Communications, Inc. 129,812,625 713,969,445 223,981,624 5.45 Qwest Communications Corporation 12,439,141 55,680,300 22,908,762 0.56 Rapid Link, USA 6,254,012 72,484,004 13,866,190 0.34 RSL Communications, Ltd. 49,477,156 327,508,880 146,446,583 3.56 SNET America, Inc. 4,117,786 31,748,129 21,314,318 0.52 Sprint 29,033,590 124,420,373 94,956,028 2.31 Star Telecommunications, Inc. 154,478,661 636,791,938 233,338,821 5.68 Startec Global Communications Corporation 24,172,259 120,861,296 79,745,577 1.94 TeleData International, Inc. 6,985,582 32,160,175 18,430,158 0.45 Teleglobe USA Inc. 73,536,382 301,409,296 185,070,176 4.50 Telegroup, Inc. 116,900,785 499,681,774 247,055,248 6.01 Telephone Company of Central Florida, Inc. (TCCF) 5,110,878 35,776,146 28,620,917 0.70 Tel-Save, Inc. 6,179,772 24,359,108 23,544,448 0.57 URSUS Telecom Corporation 7,146,987 28,203,784 26,879,811 0.65 USA Global Link, Inc. 10,156,332 48,039,881 23,130,402 0.56 USLD Communications, Inc. (USLD) 12,894,744 67,091,493 22,121,834 0.54
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend299.pdf
  • TresCom International) 88,957,638 418,573,684 171,361,442 4.17 PT-1 Communications, Inc. 129,812,625 713,969,445 223,981,624 5.45 Qwest Communications Corporation 12,439,141 55,680,300 22,908,762 0.56 Rapid Link, USA 6,254,012 72,484,004 13,866,190 0.34 RSL Communications, Ltd. 49,477,156 327,508,880 146,446,583 3.56 SNET America, Inc. 4,117,786 31,748,129 21,314,318 0.52 Sprint 29,033,590 124,420,373 94,956,028 2.31 Star Telecommunications, Inc. 154,478,661 636,791,938 233,338,821 5.68 Startec Global Communications Corporation 24,172,259 120,861,296 79,745,577 1.94 TeleData International, Inc. 6,985,582 32,160,175 18,430,158 0.45 Teleglobe USA Inc. 73,536,382 301,409,296 185,070,176 4.50 Telegroup, Inc. 116,900,785 499,681,774 247,055,248 6.01 Telephone Company of Central Florida, Inc. (TCCF) 5,110,878 35,776,146 28,620,917 0.70 Tel-Save, Inc. 6,179,772 24,359,108 23,544,448 0.57 URSUS Telecom Corporation 7,146,987 28,203,784 26,879,811 0.65 USA Global Link, Inc. 10,156,332 48,039,881 23,130,402 0.56 USLD Communications, Inc. (USLD) 12,894,744 67,091,493 22,121,834 0.54
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
  • 4.34 1937 0.22 0.35 14.4 2.59 4.19 1938 0.21 0.26 14.1 2.62 3.11 1939 0.22 0.26 13.9 2.67 3.16 1940 0.21 0.26 14.0 2.59 3.14 1941 0.21 0.26 14.7 2.43 2.99 1942 0.22 0.26 16.3 2.28 2.69 1943 0.21 0.22 17.3 2.10 2.19 1944 0.22 0.22 17.6 2.11 2.15 1945 0.21 0.22 18.0 2.03 2.10 1946 0.20 0.22 19.5 1.74 1.94 1947 0.19 0.22 22.3 1.48 1.70 1948 0.19 0.22 24.1 1.33 1.57 1949 0.19 0.22 23.8 1.36 1.59 1950 0.19 0.22 24.1 1.38 1.57 1951 0.20 0.22 26.0 1.33 1.46 1952 0.20 0.22 26.5 1.32 1.43 1953 0.21 0.22 26.7 1.34 1.42 1954 0.22 0.22 26.9 1.43 1.41 1955 0.23 0.22 26.8 1.48 1.41 1956 0.23 0.22 27.2 1.48 1.39
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd00.pdf
  • 1.09 1.08 0.86 0.79 0.68 0.67 Pakistan 1.79 1.76 1.80 1.77 1.70 1.56 1.53 1.24 1.12 0.99 0.74 Peru 1.11 1.12 1.15 1.14 1.07 1.03 1.03 0.87 0.87 0.80 0.67 Philippines 1.48 1.92 1.52 1.52 1.41 1.29 1.29 1.08 0.96 0.76 0.62 Poland 1.02 1.07 1.07 1.10 1.06 0.90 0.85 0.73 0.76 0.57 0.41 Russia 16/ 2.11 2.03 1.97 1.99 1.94 1.82 1.57 1.28 1.17 0.69 0.62 Saudi Arabia 1.22 1.34 1.37 1.34 1.41 1.25 1.20 1.05 1.08 1.00 0.88 Sierra Leone 2.49 2.11 1.93 1.93 1.94 1.78 1.80 1.22 1.07 0.47 0.75 Singapore 1.44 1.51 1.51 1.48 1.38 1.19 1.08 0.85 0.56 0.56 0.58 South Africa 1.07 1.13 1.11 1.32 1.07 0.94 0.95 0.69 0.78 0.68 0.57 Spain 1.06 1.07
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd01.pdf
  • 0.68 0.67 0.42 0.41 0.31 -61.5 Pakistan 1.77 1.70 1.56 1.53 1.24 1.12 0.99 0.74 0.67 0.46 0.29 -74.2 Peru 1.14 1.07 1.03 1.03 0.87 0.87 0.80 0.67 0.49 0.31 0.20 -77.5 Philippines 1.52 1.41 1.29 1.29 1.08 0.96 0.76 0.62 0.47 0.31 0.26 -73.4 Poland 1.10 1.06 0.90 0.85 0.73 0.76 0.57 0.41 0.39 0.37 0.26 -65.2 Russia 1.99 1.94 1.82 1.57 1.28 1.17 0.69 0.62 0.43 0.27 0.24 -79.6 Saudi Arabia 1.34 1.41 1.25 1.20 1.05 1.08 1.00 0.88 0.75 0.53 0.30 -72.6 Sierra Leone 1.93 1.94 1.78 1.80 1.22 1.07 0.47 0.75 0.61 0.83 0.43 -60.0 Singapore 1.48 1.38 1.19 1.08 0.85 0.56 0.56 0.58 0.52 0.44 0.55 -0.7 South Africa 1.32 1.07 0.94 0.95 0.69 0.78 0.68
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-1.pdf
  • 593 California 53,706,350 9.99 5,201 6,757 Colorado 11,075,336 2.06 1,073 1,393 Connecticut 9,010,873 1.68 873 1,134 Delaware 2,355,485 0.44 228 296 District of Columbia 3,097,823 0.58 300 390 Florida 36,986,820 6.88 3,582 4,654 Georgia 17,098,898 3.18 1,656 2,151 Guam NA NA NA NA Hawaii 2,227,301 0.41 216 280 Idaho 2,953,397 0.55 286 372 Illinois 22,968,104 4.27 2,224 2,890 Indiana 10,406,774 1.94 1,008 1,309 Iowa 5,156,864 0.96 499 649 Kansas 5,304,145 0.99 514 667 Kentucky 6,370,439 1.19 617 802 Louisiana 7,203,322 1.34 698 906 Maine 2,714,618 0.51 263 342 Maryland 13,227,683 2.46 1,281 1,664 Massachusetts 14,068,906 2.62 1,363 1,770 Michigan 14,516,983 2.70 1,406 1,827 Minnesota 9,045,195 1.68 876 1,138 Mississippi 4,660,870 0.87 451 586 Missouri 10,310,053 1.92 998 1,297 Montana 2,075,948 0.39
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-2.pdf
  • 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 1.08 Iowa 0.90 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.94 Kansas 0.86 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.90 Kentucky 2.40 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.02 2.49 Louisiana 0.71 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.73 Maine 10.32 0.05 0.67 0.00 0.02 11.06 Maryland 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 Massachusetts 3.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.99 Michigan 1.84 0.01 0.10 0.00 0.00 1.94 Minnesota 1.25 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.26 Mississippi 1.66 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 1.67 Missouri 0.82 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.01 0.87 Montana 2.55 0.48 0.02 0.03 0.06 3.14 Nebraska 1.65 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.04 1.75 Nevada 2.47 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.01 2.57 New Hampshire 0.74 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.75 New Jersey 0.67 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.68 New Mexico
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • 250282 C BLOUNTSVILLE TEL. CO., INC. -7.50 3.00 -10.20 -29.00 250283 A BRINDLEE MOUNTAIN TEL. CO. 7.71 -2.01 9.93 0.00 250284 C BUTLER TEL. CO., INC. 0.87 0.96 -0.09 -6.40 250285 A CASTLEBERRY TEL. CO., INC. 13.70 0.79 12.80 95.32 250286 A NATIONAL TEL. CO. OF AL 12.49 0.08 12.40 69.57 250290 C FARMERS TEL. COOP., INC.-AL 3.60 0.05 3.55 1.94 250293 C VERIZON SOUTH INC.-AL -14.08 -0.16 -13.94 0.00 250295 A>CGRACEBA TOTAL COMM. 58.08 -0.17 58.35 653.52 250298 C GULF TEL. CO.-AL 20.43 11.89 7.63 0.00 250299 C HAYNEVILLE TEL. CO., INC. 6.46 0.38 6.06 9.24 250300 C HOPPER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., INC. 10.70 1.08 9.53 13.17 250301 A FRONTIER COMM. OF LAMAR COUNTY, INC. 12.45 -1.05 13.65 150.27 250302 C
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • October 15) 7 - 20 Year 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Monthly Representative Service Charge* $37.19 $36.74 $36.92 $37.18 $37.36 $36.98 $37.34 $36.98 $37.25 $37.30 $36.99 $36.48 $37.76 $36.72 Subscriber Line Charges 4.87 4.98 4.85 4.78 5.36 5.45 5.61 5.50 5.75 5.82 6.92 6.95 6.62 6.40 Extra for Touch-Tone 2.65 2.49 1.94 1.82 1.67 1.23 1.00 0.85 0.41 0.33 0.26 0.20 0.19 0.14 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 5.18 5.23 5.13 5.29 5.39 5.37 5.59 5.66 5.81 6.11 5.95 5.82 6.65 6.67 Total Monthly Charge 49.89 49.44 48.84 49.08 49.78 49.04 49.54 49.00 49.22 49.56 50.12 49.43 51.22 49.94 Monthly Charge for Flat-Rate Service $44.84 $44.75 $44.35 $44.44 $44.85 $44.88 $45.31 $45.33
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 2,170,914 NA 10.03 365 572 717 957 Utah 161,193 NA 0.74 27 42 53 71 Vermont * 18,998 0.09 3 5 6 9 Virginia 558,206 NA 2.58 94 147 184 246 Virgin Islands 0 NA NA NA NA NA NA Washington 358,933 NA 1.66 60 95 119 158 West Virginia * 35,988 0.17 6 10 12 16 Wisconsin 420,200 NA 1.94 71 111 139 185 Wyoming * 29,538 0.14 5 8 10 13 Total 3/ 21,644,928 NA 100.00% $3,656 $5,731 $7,178 $9,578 NA - Not Applicable. * Data withheld to maintain firms confidentiality or CLECs have less than 100,000 lines in state. 1/ Industry Analysis and Technology Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Local Telephone Competition (June 2004). 2/ RBOC data from FCC
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • 18.73 799.23 341038 C FRONTIER COMM. OF ILLINOIS, INC. -16.37 3.74 -19.38 -100.00 341041 A KINSMAN MUTUAL TEL. CO. 0.22 1.87 -1.62 -8.45 341043 C LA HARPE TEL. CO. -2.29 -2.25 -0.04 -4.50 341045 C LEAF RIVER TEL. CO. -4.21 -1.60 -2.65 -7.65 341046 A LEONORE MUTUAL TEL. CO. 4.97 6.13 -1.10 -4.02 341047 C MCDONOUGH TEL. COOP., INC. 17.92 -1.94 20.25 37.13 341048 C MCNABB TEL. CO. -1.07 0.00 -1.07 -18.14 341049 C MADISON TEL. CO. 5.03 -1.55 6.69 5.78 341049A C MADISON TEL. CO. 118.92 -2.38 124.25 INFINITE 341050 A MARSEILLES TEL. CO. OF MARS. 3.05 -3.88 7.20 0.00 341053 A METAMORA TEL. CO. 9.86 -1.67 11.72 0.00 341054 A MID CENTURY TEL. COOP., INC. 2.96 -0.51 3.49 1.25
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • Table 7.9 Average Local Rates for Businesses with a Key System Line in Urban Areas 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Monthly Representative Service Charge* $37.19 $36.74 $36.92 $37.18 $37.36 $36.98 $37.34 $36.98 $37.25 $37.30 $37.10 Subscriber Line Charges 4.87 4.98 4.85 4.78 5.36 5.45 5.61 5.50 5.75 5.82 6.78 Extra for Touch-tone 2.65 2.49 1.94 1.82 1.67 1.23 1.00 0.85 0.41 0.33 0.27 Taxes, 911 and Other Charges 5.18 5.23 5.13 5.29 5.39 5.37 5.59 5.66 5.81 6.11 5.95 Total Monthly Charge 49.89 49.44 48.84 49.08 49.78 49.04 49.54 49.00 49.22 49.56 50.09 Monthly Charge for Flat-rate Service $44.84 $44.75 $44.35 $44.44 $44.85 $44.88 $45.31 $45.33 $44.71 $45.05 $43.87 Subscriber Line Charges 5.65 5.68 5.55
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • - CA -1.44 3.52 -4.79 0.00 542308 C CITIZENS UTILITIES CO. OF CALIF. 9.88 8.38 1.38 8.90 542311 C CAL-ORE TELEPHONE CO. -0.61 -0.58 -0.03 -3.14 542313 C DUCOR TELEPHONE COMPANY -6.74 4.46 -10.72 -12.19 542315 C EVANS TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.08 3.42 -1.29 -10.67 542318 C FORESTHILL TELEPHONE COMPANY -1.49 6.24 -7.28 -14.25 542319 C GTE CALIFORNIA INC. - CA -1.94 3.12 -4.91 0.00 542321 C HAPPY VALLEY TELEPHONE COMPANY -0.03 4.43 -4.27 -4.12 542322 C HORNITOS TELEPHONE COMPANY -10.77 3.12 -13.47 -17.14 542323 C WINTERHAVEN TELEPHONE COMPANY -7.61 -0.62 -7.04 -15.62 542324 C KERMAN TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.41 3.83 -1.37 -8.35 542332 C THE PONDEROSA TELEPHONE COMPANY 3.80 5.90 -1.98 1.49 542334 C ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.19 4.80 2.28 17.17 3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • 410 1,173 2,610 3,173 5,783 1.98 Massachusetts 2,240 3,646 5,887 1,035 507 1,542 3,275 4,153 7,428 2.54 Michigan 2,319 5,609 7,928 1,079 930 2,009 3,398 6,539 9,937 3.39 Minnesota 1,432 2,354 3,786 680 412 1,091 2,112 2,765 4,877 1.67 Mississippi 680 1,347 2,028 305 153 458 986 1,500 2,486 0.85 Missouri 1,554 2,758 4,312 773 603 1,376 2,327 3,361 5,688 1.94 Montana 300 418 718 137 82 219 437 500 937 0.32 N. Mariana Islands 9 16 25 4 3 7 13 19 32 0.01 Nebraska 484 890 1,374 237 149 386 721 1,039 1,760 0.60 Nevada 762 786 1,548 305 102 407 1,066 888 1,954 0.67 New Hampshire 511 596 1,107 236 86 322 747 682 1,429 0.49 New Jersey
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/00socc.pdf
  • 2.90 0.90 1.80 0.90 1.80 1.45 2.90 0.90 1.80 0.90 1.80 1.30 2.60 0.65 1.30 0.65 1.30 Sprint Res 1.55 3.10 0.95 1.90 0.80 1.60 1.50 3.00 0.95 1.90 0.80 1.60 1.40 2.80 0.85 1.70 0.75 1.50 1998 AT&T Bus 1.82 3.64 1.82 3.64 1.82 3.64 1.82 3.64 1.82 3.64 1.82 3.64 1.82 3.64 1.82 3.64 1.82 3.64 MCI Bus 1.94 3.87 1.45 2.90 1.45 2.90 1.94 3.87 1.45 2.90 1.45 2.90 1.94 3.87 1.45 2.90 1.45 2.90 Sprint Bus 1.55 3.10 0.95 1.90 0.80 1.60 1.50 3.00 0.95 1.90 0.80 1.60 1.40 2.80 0.85 1.70 0.75 1.50 AT&T Res 1.40 2.80 0.80 1.60 0.65 1.30 1.40 2.80 0.80 1.60 0.65 1.30 1.40 2.80 0.80 1.60 0.65 1.30 MCI Res 1.45
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/95socc.pdf
  • 1PM-6PM 6PM-7AM 7AM-1PM 1PM-6PM 6PM-7AM GERMANY, FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF INTERNATIONAL DIAL 1.39 1.01 0.88 1.36 0.89 0.78 ALL OTHER* 1.92 1.53 1.24 1.29 0.99 0.84 7AM-1PM 1PM-6PM 6PM-7AM 7AM-1PM 1PM-6PM 6PM-7AM GREECE INTERNATIONAL DIAL 2.29 1.32 1.18 2.03 1.19 1.07 ALL OTHER* 3.12 2.35 1.88 2.06 1.43 1.13 5PM-11PM 8AM-5PM 11PM-8AM 5PM-11PM 8AM-5PM 11PM-8AM GUAM INTERNATIONAL DIAL 2.19 1.39 1.19 1.94 1.24 1.07 ALL OTHER* 3.84 3.11 2.63 2.01 1.28 1.13 5PM-11PM 8AM-5PM 11PM-8AM 5PM-11PM 8AM-5PM 11PM-8AM GUATEMALA INTERNATIONAL DIAL 1.88 1.49 1.30 1.70 1.34 1.17 ALL OTHER* 2.80 2.23 1.81 1.73 1.49 1.29 4PM-10PM 7AM-4PM 10PM-7AM 4PM-10PM 7AM-4PM 10PM-7AM HAITI INTERNATIONAL DIAL 1.86 1.48 1.40 1.67 1.32 1.22 ALL OTHER* 2.07 1.62 1.32 1.76 1.33 1.21 STATISTICS OF COMMUNICATIONS COMMON
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/96socc.pdf
  • 1.76 1.92 3.67 1.25 2.39 0.77 1.47 1982 17/ 2.70 5.15 1.62 3.09 1.08 2.06 2.34 4.49 1.40 2.69 0.94 1.80 2.05 3.90 1.23 2.34 0.82 1.56 1983 2.70 5.15 1.62 3.09 1.08 2.06 2.34 4.49 1.40 2.69 0.94 1.80 2.05 3.90 1.23 2.34 0.82 1.56 1984 18/ 2.53 4.83 1.52 2.90 1.01 1.93 2.18 4.18 1.31 2.51 0.87 1.67 1.94 3.69 1.16 2.21 0.78 1.48 1985 19/ 2.33 4.43 1.40 2.66 0.93 1.77 2.07 3.97 1.24 2.38 0.83 1.59 1.83 3.48 1.10 2.09 0.73 1.39 1986 20/ 1.99 3.79 1.19 2.27 0.88 1.67 1.79 3.44 1.07 2.06 0.79 1.51 1.55 2.95 0.93 1.77 0.68 1.30 1987 21/ 1.58 3.08 0.98 1.91 0.74 1.45 1.50 2.95 0.93 1.83 0.71 1.39 1.23
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/97socc.pdf
  • 1.76 1.92 3.67 1.25 2.39 0.77 1.47 1982 17/ 2.70 5.15 1.62 3.09 1.08 2.06 2.34 4.49 1.40 2.69 0.94 1.80 2.05 3.90 1.23 2.34 0.82 1.56 1983 2.70 5.15 1.62 3.09 1.08 2.06 2.34 4.49 1.40 2.69 0.94 1.80 2.05 3.90 1.23 2.34 0.82 1.56 1984 18/ 2.53 4.83 1.52 2.90 1.01 1.93 2.18 4.18 1.31 2.51 0.87 1.67 1.94 3.69 1.16 2.21 0.78 1.48 1985 19/ 2.33 4.43 1.40 2.66 0.93 1.77 2.07 3.97 1.24 2.38 0.83 1.59 1.83 3.48 1.10 2.09 0.73 1.39 1986 20/ 1.99 3.79 1.19 2.27 0.88 1.67 1.79 3.44 1.07 2.06 0.79 1.51 1.55 2.95 0.93 1.77 0.68 1.30 1987 21/ 1.58 3.08 0.98 1.91 0.74 1.45 1.50 2.95 0.93 1.83 0.71 1.39 1.23
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/98SOCC.PDF
  • 1.76 1.92 3.67 1.25 2.39 0.77 1.47 1982 17/ 2.70 5.15 1.62 3.09 1.08 2.06 2.34 4.49 1.40 2.69 0.94 1.80 2.05 3.90 1.23 2.34 0.82 1.56 1983 2.70 5.15 1.62 3.09 1.08 2.06 2.34 4.49 1.40 2.69 0.94 1.80 2.05 3.90 1.23 2.34 0.82 1.56 1984 18/ 2.53 4.83 1.52 2.90 1.01 1.93 2.18 4.18 1.31 2.51 0.87 1.67 1.94 3.69 1.16 2.21 0.78 1.48 1985 19/ 2.33 4.43 1.40 2.66 0.93 1.77 2.07 3.97 1.24 2.38 0.83 1.59 1.83 3.48 1.10 2.09 0.73 1.39 1986 20/ 1.99 3.79 1.19 2.27 0.88 1.67 1.79 3.44 1.07 2.06 0.79 1.51 1.55 2.95 0.93 1.77 0.68 1.30 1987 21/ 1.58 3.08 0.98 1.91 0.74 1.45 1.50 2.95 0.93 1.83 0.71 1.39 1.23
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/99socc.pdf
  • Calls) Between NEW YORK CITY, NY and SAN FRANCISCO and LOS ANGELES, CA CHICAGO, IL PHILADELPHIA, PA Day Evening Night/Weekend Day Evening Night/Weekend Day Evening Night/Weekend Dec 31 Five Ten Five Ten Five Ten Five Ten Five Ten Five Ten Five Ten Five Ten Five Ten 1984 AT&T 2.53 4.83 1.52 2.90 1.01 1.93 2.18 4.18 1.31 2.51 0.87 1.67 1.94 3.69 1.16 2.21 0.78 1.48 MCI 2.31 4.47 1.40 2.73 0.94 1.82 1.97 3.84 1.23 2.40 0.82 1.60 1.68 3.33 1.04 2.05 0.68 1.34 Sprint 2.39 4.61 1.39 2.69 0.94 1.81 2.06 3.98 1.26 2.43 0.83 1.61 1.80 3.49 1.08 2.09 0.71 1.36 1985 AT&T 2.33 4.43 1.40 2.66 0.93 1.77 2.07 3.97 1.24 2.38 0.83 1.59 1.83 3.48 1.10
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
  • ­ EDI 0.69 0 0 0.83 0 PO-1-08-6030 % Timeouts ­ CORBA 0 0 0 0 0 PO-1-08-6050 % Timeouts - Web GUI 0.4 0.24 0.11 0 0.04 Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-118 B-5 Metric Metric September October November December January Notes Number Name VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC VZ CLEC PO-1-09-6020 Parsed CSR ­ EDI 1.41 1.94 1.31 1.81 1.33 1.69 1.32 2.08 1.42 1.87 b,e PO-1-09-6030 Parsed CSR ­ CORBA 1.41 0.35 1.31 0.26 1.33 0.26 1.32 0.36 1.42 0.32 a,b,c,d,e PO-2 - OSS Interface Availability PO-2-01-6020 OSS Interf. Avail. ­ Total ­ EDI 99.97 99.97 a,b PO-2-01-6030 OSS Interf. Avail. ­ Total ­ CORBA 99.9 99.95 a,b PO-2-01-6040 OSS Interf. Avail. ­ Total ­ Maint.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DOC-244194A1.html
  • the Act19 and section 54.706 of the Commission's rules,20 had willfully and repeatedly failed to make TRS Fund contributions in violation of section 64.604(c)(5)(iii)(A) of the Commission's rules,21 and had willfully and repeatedly failed to file Telecommunications Reporting Worksheets in a timely manner in violation of sections 54.711 of the Commission's rules.22 7. On January 28, 2004, pursuant to section 1.94(a) of the Commission's Rules,23 the Bureau informed the presiding officer of the initiation of the negotiations that lead to this Consent Decree. Pursuant to section 1.93(b) of the Commission's rules,24 the Bureau negotiated this Consent Decree to secure future compliance with sections 214, 254, and 258 of the Act25 and related Commission rules in exchange for prompt disposition of the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/FCC-05M-12A1.html
  • ORDER Adopted: March 14, 2005 Released: March 15, 2005 This is a ruling on a Joint Request for Adoption of Consent Decree and Termination of Proceeding, filed March 9, 2005, by the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Publix Network Corporation, Customer Attendants, LLC, Revenue Controls Corporation, SignTel, Inc., and Focus Group, LLC, (the ``Publix Companies'') in accordance with sections 1.93 and 1.94 of the Commission's rules [47 C.F.R. 1.93, 1.94].1 This proceeding was set for hearing by the Order to Show Cause and Notice of Opportunity for Hearing (``OSC''), 17 FCC Rcd 11487 (2002), released June 19, 2002. Issues were specified to determine whether: (1) the Commission should revoke the operating authority of the Publix Companies; (2) the Publix Companies and the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-04-437A2.html
  • and Notice ) NAL/Acct. No. 200332170002 of ) FRN: 0007179054 Opportunity for Hearing ) CONSENT ORDER Issued: February 18, 2004 Released: February 20, 2004 This is a ruling on Joint Request for Adoption of Consent Decree and Termination of Proceeding, filed on February 17, 2004, by the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Business Options, Inc. (``BOI'') in accordance with 1.93 and 1.94 of the Commission's rules [47 C.F.R. 1.93, 1.94].1 This proceeding was set for hearing by Order to Show Cause and Notice of Opportunity for Hearing, 18 F.C.C. Rcd 6881, released April 7, 2003 (``OSC''). Issues were specified to determine whether BOI had made misrepresentations or engaged in lack of candor (Issue a); to determine whether BOI had changed consumers' preferred
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-1372A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-1372A1.pdf
  • findings. GLBA, in its Response, provided a new explanation that completely contradicted its prior explanation: When [GLBA] acquired the construction permit from American Family Association, there was about 6 months left to construct. SBA Towers owned the authorized tower and [Dr. McCluskey] did not realize that it was SBA instead of Clear Channel who owns a tower very close by (1.94 km due east of CP site). It was Clear Channel with whom [Dr. McCluskey] made his agreement and constructed on that tower, again not realizing that it was the wrong tower. Again, [Dr. McCluskey] constructed the facility according to what he believed to be accurate information. . . . [GRCAC's] objection caused the inspection of November 20, 2003. However, before
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-2A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-2A1.pdf
  • (73) (42) (33) 2007 1.19 1.51 1.95 * (53) (40) (40) 2009 0.88 1.22 1.46 * (53) (31) (43) Table 11 (continued) Average Full-Service Commercial FM Stations' Revenue per Adult by Format Year No LPFM One LPFM Two or More LPFM News/Talk/Sports Format Market Measure 2005 3.02 2.35 2.46 (35) (20) (44) 2007 2.83 2.87 2.19 (25) (33) (71) 2009 1.94 1.94 1.66 (38) (46) (83) Contour Measure 2005 2.31 2.80 3.03 (45) (30) (24) 2007 2.05 2.76 2.71 (45) (38) (46) 2009 1.50 1.81 2.07 * (56) (48) (63) Miscellaneous Format Market Measure 2005 3.03 2.51 1.34 (8) (5) (6) 2007 4.54 6.17 4.32 (35) (25) (41) 2009 3.94 4.27 3.43 (51) (44) (79) Contour Measure 2005 1.52 1.77 4.43
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files/ITRND01.pdf
  • 0.68 0.67 0.42 0.41 0.31 0.27 -60.7 Pakistan 1.70 1.56 1.53 1.24 1.12 0.99 0.74 0.67 0.46 0.29 0.20 -79.4 Peru 1.07 1.03 1.03 0.87 0.87 0.80 0.67 0.49 0.31 0.20 0.12 -84.9 Philippines 1.41 1.29 1.29 1.08 0.96 0.76 0.62 0.47 0.31 0.26 0.16 -78.4 Poland 1.06 0.90 0.85 0.73 0.76 0.57 0.41 0.39 0.37 0.26 0.13 -77.6 Russia 1.94 1.82 1.57 1.28 1.17 0.69 0.62 0.43 0.27 0.24 0.24 -65.4 Saudi Arabia 1.41 1.25 1.20 1.05 1.08 1.00 0.88 0.75 0.53 0.30 0.26 -74.2 Sierra Leone 1.94 1.78 1.80 1.22 1.07 0.47 0.75 0.61 0.83 0.43 0.31 -33.8 Singapore 1.38 1.19 1.08 0.85 0.56 0.56 0.58 0.52 0.44 0.55 0.48 -13.9 South Africa 1.07 0.94 0.95 0.69 0.78 0.68
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/peer_review/prlpfm_rpt_economic_study.pdf
  • 1.95 * (53) (40) (40) 2009 0.88 1.22 1.46 * (53) (31) (43) Federal Communications Commission DA 12-2 89 Table 11 (continued) Average Full-Service Commercial FM Stations' Revenue per Adult by Format Year No LPFM One LPFM Two or More LPFM News/Talk/Sports Format Market Measure 2005 3.02 2.35 2.46 (35) (20) (44) 2007 2.83 2.87 2.19 (25) (33) (71) 2009 1.94 1.94 1.66 (38) (46) (83) Contour Measure 2005 2.31 2.80 3.03 (45) (30) (24) 2007 2.05 2.76 2.71 (45) (38) (46) 2009 1.50 1.81 2.07 * (56) (48) (63) Miscellaneous Format Market Measure 2005 3.03 2.51 1.34 (8) (5) (6) 2007 4.54 6.17 4.32 (35) (25) (41) 2009 3.94 4.27 3.43 (51) (44) (79) Contour Measure 2005 1.52 1.77 4.43