FCC Web Documents citing 1.958

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-95A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-95A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-95A1.txt
  • 97 and 101, and other Subparts of Part 90 currently do not specify a distance calculation method. Applying a single distance calculation method to all Wireless Radio Services should provide regulatory certainty and consistency to service providers licensed under these rule parts. We therefore tentatively conclude that section 22.157 should be recodified to Part 1, Subpart F, as new section 1.958, and that the reference to section 73.611 in section 90.309(a)(1) should be deleted and replaced by a reference to new section 1.958. The recodification of section 22.157 to Part 1, Subpart F, will make this distance calculation method applicable to all Wireless Radio Services described in Parts 1 (except Parts 21 and 101 as explained below), 20, 22, 24, 27,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1356A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1356A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1356A1.txt
  • an Automated Maritime Telecommunications System station at Chicago, Illinois, on September 20, 1999, IS GRANTED ON THE CONDITION that the effective radiated power shall not exceed 400 watts along any radial. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority of Sections 4(i) and 309 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 309, and Sections 1.958, 1.962, 80.215, and 80.475 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.958, 1.962, 80.215, 80.475, the Petition to Deny Automated Maritime Telecommunications System application, Lockport, Illinois, filed by KM LPTV of Chicago-13, LLC on November 4, 1999, IS GRANTED, and the application filed by RegioNet Wireless License, LLC, for authorization to construct and operate an Automated Maritime Telecommunications System station
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1709A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1709A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1709A1.txt
  • the area he proposes to operate. See 47 C.F.R. � 90.625(a). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.934(e)(2), which provides that the Commission may dismiss applications that request spectrum which is unavailable because it was previously assigned to another licensee on an exclusive basis or cannot be assigned to the applicant without causing harmful interference. This provision clarifies former 47 C.F.R. � 1.958(a)(6) (1998) which categorized these applications as not in accordance with the Commission's rules or requirements and subject to dismissal. See former 47 C.F.R. � 1.958(a)(6). Federal Communications Commission DA 00-1709 Federal Communications Commission DA 00-1709 i j { � � - Y c ' � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1717A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1717A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1717A1.txt
  • MHz, and CN WAN clarifies this frequency was not part of its application. We agree, and, like CN WAN, treat any reference in the LTAB decision to the ``952.58125/928.20625 MHz'' frequency pair to instead be a reference to the ``952/928.20625 MHz'' frequency pair. Although the LTAB decision characterized this dismissal as pursuant to the provisions of former 47 C.F.R. � 1.958, it was instead pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.934, which includes the provisions of former Section 1.958. File Nos. 0000013414, 0000013423, 0000013429 and 0000013435, deleting sites operating on the frequency pair 952/928.21250 MHz under the call sign KNKK276 (notifications filed May 13, 1999). CN Wan reconsideration at 3. Public Notice, Application Requirements for Stations in the Private Operational Fixed Microwave
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2673A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2673A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2673A1.txt
  • the missing information, and warned that a failure to comply with the request could result in the Application being dismissed. On October 22, 1999, PCIA resubmitted the Application to the Branch with the antenna structure registration number, but without the requested loading information. Consequently, on November 3, 1999, the Branch dismissed the Application as defective, in accordance with former Section 1.958 of the Commission's Rules, because of the lack of a loading justification. Discussion. In the Petition, JSM seeks reinstatement of the Application. JSM maintains that it complied in good faith with the Commission's request and provided PCIA the requested information in a timely fashion, but that PCIA subsequently failed to provide the loading information to the Branch. JSM argues that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-473A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-473A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-473A1.txt
  • or duly authorized employees of corporations to sign applications, amendments, thereto, and related statements of fact required by the Commission, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 69 FCC2d 934 n.1 (1978). See e.g. Character Qualifications MO&O, 6 FCC Rcd at 3448-3449 � 6; Transfer of Control of Station KGA, Spokane Wash., to Monroe Broadcasting, Order, 26 FCC2d 204 (1970). 47 C.F.R. � 1.958 (1997). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA - 00-473 Federal Communications Commission DA 00-473 �@��� @& b i
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-4A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-4A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-4A1.txt
  • the Commission to the applicant will be processed in its original position in the processing line if it is resubmitted and received by the Commission within 30 days. Creative Airtime Petition at 2; Hardrock Concrete June 25th Letter at 2. 47 C.F.R. � 1.913(a), (c) (1998); See also Denver Partners, Order, 13 FCC Rcd. 14051 (CWD 1998). 47 C.F.R. � 1.958(b); see also Amendment of Parts 0, 1, 2 and 95 of the Commission's Rules to Provide for Interactive Video Data Services, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 8 FCC Rcd 6409 (1993). Hardrock June 25th Letter at 2. 47 C.F.R. � 1.913(b) also permits an applicant's designated vessel master to sign the form when a temporary permit is requested for a vessel.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-60A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-60A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-60A1.txt
  • � 154(i), and sections 0.331 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.331, 1.925, the request for waiver filed by Robert Ventresca on April 5, 1999 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Suzan Friedman Deputy Chief, Policy and Rules Branch Commercial Wireless Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 1.949(a). Ventresca actually requests a waiver of 47 U.S.C. � 1.958 (1998), which has been superseded by 47 C.F.R. � 1.934. Section 1.958, however, addressed Defective Applications, not license renewals. Accordingly, we will construe his request as a waiver of section 1.949(a). Id. Federal Communications Commission DA 00-61 Federal Communications Commission DA 00-60 x y `` '' < = > ? B C E F q r s t y z
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1552A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1552A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1552A1.txt
  • 8. 47 C.F.R. � 1.929(k) states that ``any change not specifically listed above as major is considered minor.'' Petitions at 8-9. We note that SDGE is correct in its assessment that the Branch did not cite the correct authority for its action. See Petitions at 12-13. 47 C.F.R. � 1.227 is not applicable in this instance and 47 C.F.R. � 1.958 no longer exists. 47 C.F.R. � 1.934 is the appropriate authority. Federal Communications Commission DA 01-1552 Federal Communications Commission DA 01-1552 � � � � �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �`� �0� � $ *
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1364A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1364A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1364A1.txt
  • request for antenna height clearance and obstruction and marking specifications (FCC Form 854).'' The Commission revised this form by amending Section 22.143(d)(4) of the rules to include the correct filing location for FCC Form 854 as ``WTB, Spectrum Management Resources and Technologies Division, 1270 Fairfield Road, Gettysburg, PA 17325.'' Computation of Distance The Commission recodified Section 22.157 as new Section 1.958 in Part 1, Subpart F. This will make the Section 22.157 distance calculation method applicable to all Wireless Radio Services described in Parts 1 (except Parts 21 and 101 as explained below), 20, 22, 24, 27, 80, 87, 90, 95, and 97 (see 47 C.F.R. � 1.901) and supersede any conflicting regulations in these Parts (see 47 C.F.R. � 1.902).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-732A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-732A2.txt
  • 3.131 1.893 1.953 2.021 18.127 18.317 20.015 238.305 261.998 269.53 1.348 1.467 1.45 8,920.6710,408.7911,790.44 3.053 2.373 2.671 270.39 265.398 266.293 34.135 36.102 37.968 4.623 5.603 5.502 1,361.831,420.911,609.49 1.062 1.056 1.04 0.563 0.551 0.548 0.625 0.639 0.637 3.264 3.496 3.529 4.469 4.745 4.991 0.779 0.776 0.776 47.794 49.912 52.729 2.041 2.065 2.096 1.482 1.466 1.479 1.428 1.412 1.416 1.376 1.362 1.625 1.958 1.997 2.146 4.06 4.241 4.422 9.194 9.278 9.262 1.719 1.708 1.683 25.387 24.447 25.723 17.005 16.987 16.567 1.346 1.504 1.676 452.951 487.456 518.809 16.598 16.767 17.215 0.178 0.195 0.206 257.871 260.458 264.263 0.898 0.906 0.954 6.438 4.802 5.018 0.602 0.615 0.634 1.04 1.083 1.16 1.583 1.573 1.655 0.997 0.973 0.96 667.89 758.255 819.153 2.809 3.153 3.549 4.772 4.192 4.492 0.653
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • NEW JERSEY 1,415,473,749 5,577,359 253.79 0 0.000 NEW MEXICO 329,606,283 909,041 362.59 21,133,231 1.889 NEW YORK 3,066,808,463 10,230,291 299.78 6,963,673 0.623 NORTH CAROLINA 1,451,265,675 4,362,919 332.64 14,933,220 1.335 NORTH DAKOTA 128,834,131 332,667 387.28 15,872,591 1.419 NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS 7,403,905 22,770 325.16 0 0.000 OHIO 1,506,307,465 5,887,158 255.86 9,763,604 0.873 OKLAHOMA 568,239,379 1,635,403 347.46 51,458,316 4.601 OREGON 624,280,825 1,855,141 336.51 21,903,762 1.958 PENNSYLVANIA 1,891,148,729 7,034,040 268.86 2,046,791 0.183 PUERTO RICO 449,367,142 1,158,243 387.97 4,558,460 0.408 RHODE ISLAND 124,589,161 431,042 289.04 0 0.000 SOUTH CAROLINA 803,178,662 2,073,761 387.31 25,629,237 2.291 SOUTH DAKOTA 149,578,638 333,770 448.15 25,983,729 2.323 TENNESSEE 1,004,647,939 2,987,705 336.26 13,324,211 1.191 TEXAS 3,796,857,360 10,945,498 346.89 109,604,487 9.799 UTAH 325,400,601 1,022,713 318.17 7,796,511 0.697 VERMONT 138,211,828 397,603 347.61 5,648,531 0.505 VIRGIN ISLANDS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • NEW JERSEY 1,415,473,749 5,577,359 253.79 0 0.000 NEW MEXICO 329,606,283 909,041 362.59 21,133,231 1.889 NEW YORK 3,066,808,463 10,230,291 299.78 6,963,673 0.623 NORTH CAROLINA 1,451,265,675 4,362,919 332.64 14,933,220 1.335 NORTH DAKOTA 128,834,131 332,667 387.28 15,872,591 1.419 NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS 7,403,905 22,770 325.16 0 0.000 OHIO 1,506,307,465 5,887,158 255.86 9,763,604 0.873 OKLAHOMA 568,239,379 1,635,403 347.46 51,458,316 4.601 OREGON 624,280,825 1,855,141 336.51 21,903,762 1.958 PENNSYLVANIA 1,891,148,729 7,034,040 268.86 2,046,791 0.183 PUERTO RICO 449,367,142 1,158,243 387.97 4,558,460 0.408 RHODE ISLAND 124,589,161 431,042 289.04 0 0.000 SOUTH CAROLINA 803,178,662 2,073,761 387.31 25,629,237 2.291 SOUTH DAKOTA 149,578,638 333,770 448.15 25,983,729 2.323 TENNESSEE 1,004,647,939 2,987,705 336.26 13,324,211 1.191 TEXAS 3,796,857,360 10,945,498 346.89 109,604,487 9.799 UTAH 325,400,601 1,022,713 318.17 7,796,511 0.697 VERMONT 138,211,828 397,603 347.61 5,648,531 0.505 VIRGIN ISLANDS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-14A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-14A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-14A1.txt
  • had approved and authorized the signature on the application at the time it was made. On August 10, 1998, the Branch concurred with Creative Airtime's contention that the applicant did not properly sign the application. As a result, the Branch returned the application to Hardrock Concrete for correction in accordance with the former Private Radio Bureau's policy of waiving Section 1.958 of the Commission's Rules for the limited purpose of permitting applicants who failed to sign their applications an opportunity to do so without forfeiting their fee. The Branch concluded that the policy applied to the Hardrock Concrete application because the improper signature resulted in the application being unsigned. On August 27, 1998, Creative Airtime requested reconsideration of the Branch's decision
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-95A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-95A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-95A1.txt
  • 97 and 101, and other Subparts of Part 90 currently do not specify a distance calculation method. Applying a single distance calculation method to all Wireless Radio Services should provide regulatory certainty and consistency to service providers licensed under these rule parts. We therefore tentatively conclude that section 22.157 should be recodified to Part 1, Subpart F, as new section 1.958, and that the reference to section 73.611 in section 90.309(a)(1) should be deleted and replaced by a reference to new section 1.958. The recodification of section 22.157 to Part 1, Subpart F, will make this distance calculation method applicable to all Wireless Radio Services described in Parts 1 (except Parts 21 and 101 as explained below), 20, 22, 24, 27,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-287A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-287A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-287A1.txt
  • correct filing location for FCC Form 854 is ``WTB, Spectrum Management Resources and Technologies Division, 1270 Fairfield Road, Gettysburg, PA 17325.'' We revise this form accordingly, and we amend Section 22.143(d)(4) of our rules to include this updated address. Computation of Distance Background. In the Notice, we proposed to recodify Section 22.157 in Part 1, Subpart F, as new Section 1.958, so that a single distance calculation method would apply to all Wireless Radio Services, providing regulatory certainty and consistency to service providers licensed under these rule parts. Currently, Section 22.157 requires that distance calculations be rounded to the nearest whole kilometer, while Section 90.309(a)(1) requires that they be rounded to the nearest 0.1 kilometer. We also noted that the Section
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-287A1_Erratum.doc
  • correct filing location for FCC Form 854 is ``WTB, Spectrum Management Resources and Technologies Division, 1270 Fairfield Road, Gettysburg, PA 17325.'' We revise this form accordingly, and we amend Section 22.143(d)(4) of our rules to include this updated address. Computation of Distance Background. In the Notice, we proposed to recodify Section 22.157 in Part 1, Subpart F, as new Section 1.958, so that a single distance calculation method would apply to all Wireless Radio Services, providing regulatory certainty and consistency to service providers licensed under these rule parts. Currently, Section 22.157 requires that distance calculations be rounded to the nearest whole kilometer, while Section 90.309(a)(1) requires that they be rounded to the nearest 0.1 kilometer. We also noted that the Section
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-20A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-20A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-20A1.txt
  • Limit Proposal 54 G. Other Alternatives to the Commission's Proposed Transition 59 H. Proposed Amendments to Rules and Possible Rule Relocation 62 1. Proposed Amendments 62 a. Transition-related Amendments 62 b. AMPS-related Data Collection; Other Deletions and Updates 63 2. Possible Relocation of Part 22 Cellular and Part 24 PCS Rules to Part 27 65 3. Proposed Correction of Section 1.958(d) 66 IV. Order 67 A. Suspension of Certain Filings 67 B. Currently Pending Non-Mutually Exclusive Applications in Covered CMA Blocks 73 V. Procedural Matters 76 A. Ex Parte Rules - Permit-But-Disclose 76 B. Comment Period and Procedures 77 C. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis 79 D. Initial Paperwork Reduction Analysis 80 E. Further Information 81 VI. ORDERING CLAUSES 82 APPENDIX A
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-20A1_Rcd.pdf
  • Procedures...................................................................................................46 E.Gulf of Mexico Service Area.........................................................................................................52 F.Signal Field Strength Limit Proposal.............................................................................................54 G.Other Alternatives to the Commission's Proposed Transition.......................................................59 H.Proposed Amendments to Rules and Possible Rule Relocation....................................................62 1.Proposed Amendments............................................................................................................62 a.Transition-related Amendments........................................................................................62 b.AMPS-related DataCollection; Other Deletions and Updates.........................................63 1745 Federal Communications Commission FCC 12-20 2.Possible Relocation of Part 22 Cellular and Part 24 PCS Rules to Part 27.............................65 3.Proposed Correction of Section 1.958(d)................................................................................66 IV.ORDER.................................................................................................................................................67 A.Suspension of Certain Filings........................................................................................................67 B.Currently Pending Non-Mutually Exclusive Applications in Covered CMA Blocks....................73 V.PROCEDURAL MATTERS................................................................................................................76 A.Ex ParteRules �Permit-But-Disclose...........................................................................................76 B.Comment Period and Procedures...................................................................................................77 C.Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis...........................................................................................79 D.Initial Paperwork Reduction Analysis...........................................................................................80 E.Further Information........................................................................................................................81 VI.ORDERING CLAUSES.......................................................................................................................82 APPENDIX A �List of Commenters APPENDIX B �Maps Showing Unserved Area in (1) Continental U.S., (2) Alaska APPENDIX C �List of CMA Blocks That Meet
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.wp
  • ULS forms). 1.951 How applications are distributed (deleted). No new rule Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-25 C-3 1.952 How file numbers are assigned (deleted). No new rule 1.953 How applications are processed (renumbered and revised 1.926 to reflect ULS procedures). 1.955 Frequency coordination, Canada (renumbered and 1.923 combined with other rules into new consolidated rule for all Wireless Radio Services). 1.958 Defective applications (renumbered and combined with 1.934 other rules into new consolidated rule for all Wireless Radio Services). 1.959 Resubmitted applications (renumbered and combined 1.933, 1.934 with other rules into new consolidated rule for all Wireless Radio Services). 1.961 Dismissal of applications (renumbered and combined 1.934 with other rules into new consolidated rule for all Wireless Radio Services). 1.962 Public
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/220_e.pdf
  • Second Report and Order that alternative, albeit inferior sites may exist. Petitioners also assert that such an alternative showing procedure is utilized for all public 385 mobile services governed by Part 22, and Incom argues that the Budget Act of 1993 would 386 387 Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-93 Incom Second Order Petition at 12 n.5. 388 47 C.F.R. � 1.958. 389 220 MHz Second Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 3671 (para. 11). 390 AMTA Second Order Petition at 9 n.5; Incom Second Order Petition at 12. 391 47 C.F.R. � 22.119. 392 Section 1.958 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.958. 393 Wait Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1158 (D.C. Cir. 1969). 394 PAGE 87 appear
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/fc980093.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/fc980093.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/fc980093.wp
  • AMTA Second Order Petition at 9-10; Incom Second Order Petition at 13. 386 AMTA Second Order Petition at 9 n.5; Incom Second Order Petition at 12. 387 Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993, Pub. L. No. 103-66, Title VI, � 6002(d)(3)(B), 107 Stat. 312, 397 (1993) (Budget Act). 388 Incom Second Order Petition at 12 n.5. 389 47 C.F.R. � 1.958. PAGE 83 Commission adopted in the 220 MHz Second Report and Order. AMTA and Incom express concern that the 380 220 MHz Second Report and Order did not provide for a protection mechanism or for a tolling of the construction period for licensees filing such waiver requests. They argue that if a waiver request 381 is ultimately denied, a licensee
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/4361-97.pdf
  • share by carrier Total Percent share by carrier revenues 1 2 3 4 Other from PTT 1 2 3 4 Other from PTT 1 2 3 4 Other Words 1 2 3 4 Other Andorra $0 $0 $0 0 Austria $20,04630.969.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $7,53764.917.6 0.017.4 0.0 $2,29219.337.7 0.043.0 0.0 70,42550.941.8 0.0 7.3 0.0 Belgium $30,04063.136.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 $8,941 1.958.4 0.039.7 0.0 $12,36026.858.0 0.015.2 0.0 93,21547.339.2 0.013.5 0.0 Cyprus $11,06669.230.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 $1,843 2.997.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 $66529.867.4 0.0 2.9 0.0 33,09256.044.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Denmark $5,96462.835.1 0.0 2.1 0.0 $1,79096.4 1.8 0.0 1.8 0.0 $2,50391.7 6.1 0.0 2.2 0.0 20,06979.518.0 0.0 2.4 0.0 Finland $5,32452.147.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 $3,56798.4 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 $2,89116.774.6 0.0 8.7 0.0 26,09382.717.3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • basis, funding commitments for the three types of services: internal connections, Internet access, and telecommunications & dedicated access. Because the data in these tables show commitments through August 8, 2000, the commitment totals in these tables differ from the commitment totals reported above, which reflect commitments made through June 7 The 1.988 billion figure was arrived at by adding the 1.958 billion dollars of commitments reported by USAC last quarter (see Universal Service Administrative Company, Federal Universal Service Programs, Fund Size Projections and Contribution Base for the Third Quarter 2000, page 27) and the additional 30 million dollars of funding commitments that USAC reports in this quarter (see Universal Service Administrative Company, Federal Universal Service Programs, Fund Size Projections and Contribution
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.wp
  • ULS forms). 1.951 How applications are distributed (deleted). No new rule Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-25 C-3 1.952 How file numbers are assigned (deleted). No new rule 1.953 How applications are processed (renumbered and revised 1.926 to reflect ULS procedures). 1.955 Frequency coordination, Canada (renumbered and 1.923 combined with other rules into new consolidated rule for all Wireless Radio Services). 1.958 Defective applications (renumbered and combined with 1.934 other rules into new consolidated rule for all Wireless Radio Services). 1.959 Resubmitted applications (renumbered and combined 1.933, 1.934 with other rules into new consolidated rule for all Wireless Radio Services). 1.961 Dismissal of applications (renumbered and combined 1.934 with other rules into new consolidated rule for all Wireless Radio Services). 1.962 Public
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/da992540.doc
  • previously authorized to use 864.6375 MHz for simplex, mobile-only operation. On March 5, 1998, the Branch asked Country Cousins for more information to justify its request for waiver and requested a response within thirty days. When Country Cousins did not respond within this time frame, the application was deemed defective and was dismissed on May 28, 1998, pursuant to Section 1.958 of the Rules. 4. On June 11, 1998, Country Cousins requested reconsideration of the dismissal claiming that it had been unaware of the March 5, 1998, letter because the person handling this issue had retired in March 1998. On July 22, 1998, a copy of the March 5, 1998, letter was sent, via facsimile, to Country Cousins. On July 27,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da000004.doc
  • the Commission to the applicant will be processed in its original position in the processing line if it is resubmitted and received by the Commission within 30 days. Creative Airtime Petition at 2; Hardrock Concrete June 25th Letter at 2. 47 C.F.R. � 1.913(a), (c) (1998); See also Denver Partners, Order, 13 FCC Rcd. 14051 (CWD 1998). 47 C.F.R. � 1.958(b); see also Amendment of Parts 0, 1, 2 and 95 of the Commission's Rules to Provide for Interactive Video Data Services, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 8 FCC Rcd 6409 (1993). Hardrock June 25th Letter at 2. 47 C.F.R. � 1.913(b) also permits an applicant's designated vessel master to sign the form when a temporary permit is requested for a vessel.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da000060.doc
  • � 154(i), and sections 0.331 and 1.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 0.331, 1.925, the request for waiver filed by Robert Ventresca on April 5, 1999 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Suzan Friedman Deputy Chief, Policy and Rules Branch Commercial Wireless Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau 47 C.F.R. � 1.949(a). Ventresca actually requests a waiver of 47 U.S.C. � 1.958 (1998), which has been superseded by 47 C.F.R. � 1.934. Section 1.958, however, addressed Defective Applications, not license renewals. Accordingly, we will construe his request as a waiver of section 1.949(a). Id. Federal Communications Commission DA 00-61 Federal Communications Commission DA 00-60 � � � � � � � � �
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da000473.doc
  • or duly authorized employees of corporations to sign applications, amendments, thereto, and related statements of fact required by the Commission, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 69 FCC2d 934 n.1 (1978). See e.g. Character Qualifications MO&O, 6 FCC Rcd at 3448-3449 � 6; Transfer of Control of Station KGA, Spokane Wash., to Monroe Broadcasting, Order, 26 FCC2d 204 (1970). 47 C.F.R. � 1.958 (1997). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA - 00-473 Federal Communications Commission DA 00-473 N O � � |� @& b i 0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da001709.doc
  • the area he proposes to operate. See 47 C.F.R. � 90.625(a). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.934(e)(2), which provides that the Commission may dismiss applications that request spectrum which is unavailable because it was previously assigned to another licensee on an exclusive basis or cannot be assigned to the applicant without causing harmful interference. This provision clarifies former 47 C.F.R. � 1.958(a)(6) (1998) which categorized these applications as not in accordance with the Commission's rules or requirements and subject to dismissal. See former 47 C.F.R. � 1.958(a)(6). Federal Communications Commission DA 00-1709 Federal Communications Commission DA 00-1709 � � 8 � - 0 0 Y c ' � � �
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da001717.doc
  • MHz, and CN WAN clarifies this frequency was not part of its application. We agree, and, like CN WAN, treat any reference in the LTAB decision to the ``952.58125/928.20625 MHz'' frequency pair to instead be a reference to the ``952/928.20625 MHz'' frequency pair. Although the LTAB decision characterized this dismissal as pursuant to the provisions of former 47 C.F.R. � 1.958, it was instead pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.934, which includes the provisions of former Section 1.958. File Nos. 0000013414, 0000013423, 0000013429 and 0000013435, deleting sites operating on the frequency pair 952/928.21250 MHz under the call sign KNKK276 (notifications filed May 13, 1999). CN Wan reconsideration at 3. Public Notice, Application Requirements for Stations in the Private Operational Fixed Microwave
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/da992631.doc
  • � I I I y I y I I I I I e � � I I I I I � � I FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 445 12TH STREET, S.W. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 DA 99-2631 News media information 202/418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202/418-2830 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov Released: November 23, 1999 39 GHZ APPLICATIONS DISMISSED Effective November 23, 1999, in accordance with Section 1.958(c) of the Commission's Rules, the following 39 GHz applications are dismissed pursuant to a Report and Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rule Making, ET Docket 95-183, (FCC 97-391), released November 3, 1997, and a Memorandum and Opinion Order, ET Docket 95-183 (FCC 99-179) released July 29, 1999. For more information contact the Licensing and Technical Analysis Branch at (717)