FCC Web Documents citing 2.1073

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3189A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3189A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3189A1.txt
  • DOC procedures. However, VIA admits that it only tested these CPU boards for compliance with the Part 15 emission limits with the SSC function enabled. Under Section 2.906(b) of the Rules, a DOC attaches only to items subsequently marketed by the responsible party which are identical to the sample tested and found acceptable by the responsible party. Furthermore, under Section 2.1073 of the Rules, the responsible party must warrant that each unit of equipment marketed under a DOC is identical to the unit tested and found acceptable with the standards and that the records maintained by the responsible party continue to reflect the equipment being produced under the DOC within the variation that can be expected due to quantity production and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.txt
  • and thus allow such products to reach the marketplace more quickly. These rules all align the FCC's equipment authorization requirements for personal computers with those used in other parts of the world. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 154, 302, 303, 307. Section Number and Title: 2.906 Declaration of Conformity. 2.909 Responsible Party. 2.1071 Cross Reference. 2.1072 Limitation on Declaration of Conformity. 2.1073 Responsibilities. 2.1074 Identification. 2.1075 Retention of Records. 2.1076 FCC inspection and submission of equipment for testing. 2.1077 Compliance information. PART 15-RADIO FREQUENCY DEVICES SUBPART A-GENERAL Brief Description: These rules specify the testing and labeling requirements for the ``Declaration of Conformity'' (DoC) procedure which permits these devices to be authorized based on a manufacturer's or supplier's declaration that the computer product
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-92A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-92A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-92A1.txt
  • Rules to Create a Wireless Medical Telemetry Service, ET Docket No. 99-255, Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd. 11,206 (2000). , supra. AMPTP reply comments at 2; AMPTP Petition at 5. AMPTP Petition at 5. , supra for our proposals regarding the TV BAS emission mask. 47 C.F.R. Part 2, Subpart J. 47 C.F.R. § 2.952. Id. 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.1073, 2.1074, and 2.1077 AMPTP Petition at 4. 47 C.F.R. § 73.683. 47 C.F.R. § 74.861(e)(1). supra. The 250 milliwatts proposed for WAVDs is 7 dB more than the 50 milliwatts allowed for wireless microphones in the VHF-TV band. 47 C.F.R. § 74.861(e)(5). An NTSC television signal contains a picture carrier at 1.25 MHz from the lower band edge, a chrominance
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-3189A1.html
  • DOC procedures. However, VIA admits that it only tested these CPU boards for compliance with the Part 15 emission limits with the SSC function enabled. Under Section 2.906(b) of the Rules,12 a DOC attaches only to items subsequently marketed by the responsible party which are identical13 to the sample tested and found acceptable by the responsible party. Furthermore, under Section 2.1073 of the Rules,14 the responsible party must warrant that each unit of equipment marketed under a DOC is identical to the unit tested and found acceptable with the standards and that the records maintained by the responsible party continue to reflect the equipment being produced under the DOC within the variation that can be expected due to quantity production and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-3189A1.html
  • DOC procedures. However, VIA admits that it only tested these CPU boards for compliance with the Part 15 emission limits with the SSC function enabled. Under Section 2.906(b) of the Rules,12 a DOC attaches only to items subsequently marketed by the responsible party which are identical13 to the sample tested and found acceptable by the responsible party. Furthermore, under Section 2.1073 of the Rules,14 the responsible party must warrant that each unit of equipment marketed under a DOC is identical to the unit tested and found acceptable with the standards and that the records maintained by the responsible party continue to reflect the equipment being produced under the DOC within the variation that can be expected due to quantity production and