FCC Web Documents citing 2.1093

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2042A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2042A1.pdf
  • this case does not raise safety concerns because the source-based time-averaged RF output power is below the threshold level required for SAR testing per OET equipment authorization policies, and as a general matter, part 15 spread spectrum devices are categorically excluded from routine environmental evaluation for RF exposure prior to equipment authorization or use. See 47 C.F.R. § § 1.1307(b)(1), 2.1093(c), and 15.247(i). 47 C.F.R. § 15.247(b)(4). As explained by CoachComm, the peak output powers of the initial and substitute RF modules are 69 mW and 60 mW, respectively. Because the directional corner reflector antenna has a gain of 9 dBi, however, the one watt power limit must be derated to reflect the coverage of a 6 dBi antenna. Both modules
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-91A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-91A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-91A1.txt
  • FNPRM at ¶¶ 21-27. See Upper 700 MHz First Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 519-20, ¶ 106; see also Upper 700 MHz MO&O and FNPRM at ¶¶ 21-27. Upper 700 MHz First Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 521-22, ¶ 111. See supra para. 43. These existing requirements are found in 47 CFR §§ 1.1307(b), 1.1310, 2.1091, 2.1093. See supra paras. 4, 14. Upper 700 MHz First Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 494, ¶ 43 n.95 (``The provision of new broadcast-type services compliant with Part 27 technical standards does not alter the underlying nature of such services, or the licensee's related regulatory and statutory obligations.'') (emphasis added). The Upper 700 MHz First Report and Order did
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-180A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-180A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-180A1.txt
  • a need for antenna gain regulation if we adopt geographic area licensing. To the extent commenters believe a minimum antenna gain requirement is necessary, we seek comment on Endwave's proposal to relax the technical parameters proposed by Loea. RF Safety. We propose that licensees and manufacturers be subject to the RF radiation exposure requirements specified in Sections 1.1307(b), 2.1091 and 2.1093 of our Rules, which list the services and devices for which an environmental evaluation must be performed. We seek comment on requiring routine environmental evaluations for RF exposure in the case of fixed operations, including base stations in cases where there is a possible safety risk if the installation of the transmitter antenna is not properly designed. We propose to
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-305A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-305A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-305A1.txt
  • situations. Moreover, the Commission found the 1,000 watts ERP threshold consistent with its existing rules for transmitters and devices of comparable use and similar operating frequencies. For the same reasons, we propose to adopt the 1,000 watts ERP safety threshold for fixed operations in the 1710-1755 MHz and 2110-2155 MHz bands. We therefore propose to modify sections 1.1307(b), 2.1091, and 2.1093 of our rules to include services and devices applicable to the 1710-1755 MHz and 2110-2155 MHz bands. We invite comment on this proposal and any alternatives. Other Technical Rules; Canadian and Mexican Coordination Other Technical Rules. The application of general provisions of Part 22, 24 or 27 would include rules related to equipment authorization, frequency stability, antenna structures and air
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-222A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-222A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-222A1.txt
  • and Applications of Broadwave USA, PDC Broadband Corporation, and Satellite Receivers, Ltd. To Provide a Fixed Service in the 12.2 - 12.7 GHz Band, Fourth Memorandum Opinion and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 8428 (2003). We note that some cellular handsets available today already approach the specific absorption rate limits specified in our rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1310, 2.1091, and 2.1093. Therefore, commenters who advocate higher power level for cellular handsets may wish to consider whether other design considerations can compensate for increased power levels so that such handsets do not violate our electromagnetic radiation exposure rules. >. >. >. Many commercial wireless licenses have site-based incumbents, including the 220 MHz, 800 MHz SMR, and paging services. 47 U.S.C. § 309(j)(4)(C).
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-56A4.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-56A4.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-56A4.txt
  • some cases licensees may refrain from entering into such transactions to preclude potential competitors. We seek comment on whether high transaction costs or anti-competitive motivations will hinder such transactions. RF Safety The Coalition states that to implement its proposed approach, we should amend our RF emissions rules. More specifically, the Coalition contends that we should amend Sections 1.1307(b)(2), 2.1091(c) and 2.1093(c) to include MDS and ITFS services. The Commission considers RF safety procedures to be essential in protecting human beings from excessive exposure to RF energy. Accordingly, we seek comment on whether and how we should amend the RF safety rules. North American Datum (NAD) 83 Coordinate Data The Coalition notes that our rules require the submission of different coordinate data
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-218A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-218A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-218A1.txt
  • the exposure guidelines for 1710-1755 and 2110-2155 MHz bands are the same as those for spectrum at 1915-1920 MHz, 1995-2000 MHz, 2020-2025 MHz, and 2175-2180 MHz, we tentatively conclude that the threshold for environmental review of fixed transmission facilities should be an ERP greater than 1000 watts, and that we should make any necessary modifications to sections 1.1307(b), 2.1091, and 2.1093 of our rules to include services and devices applicable to the 1915-1920 MHz, 1995-2000 MHz, 2020-2025 MHz, and 2175-2180 MHz bands. Evaluation of mobile and portable devices in these bands will follow the rules adopted in sections 2.1091 and 2.1093, respectively. We seek comment on this tentative conclusion. Other Technical Rules; Canadian and Mexican Coordination Other Technical Rules: The application
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-164A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-164A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-164A1.txt
  • Section 1.1307(b) provides that Commission actions granting construction permits, licenses to transmit or renewals thereof, equipment authorizations, or modifications in existing facilities require the preparation of an EA if the particular facility, operation or transmitter would cause human exposure to levels of radiofrequency (RF) emissions in excess of the guidelines that the Commission has adopted. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1310, 2.1093. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1306(a). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1307(c), (d). Under Section 1.1307(c), an interested person may petition the Bureau responsible for processing a particular action to require environmental consideration, where such consideration would not otherwise be required by the rules. If the Bureau determines that the action may have a significant environmental impact, it will require that an EA be
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-24A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-24A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-24A1.txt
  • proposals that would provide more flexibility to M-LMS than current rules. We also seek comment on whether allowing these stations to operate using such technologies at higher power levels than permitted generally under Section 15.247 would raise any questions related to human exposure to electromagnetic radiation and whether they therefore should be subject to the procedures of Sections 2.1091 and 2.1093. C. M-LMS Spectrum Aggregation Limit The Commission's Part 90 M-LMS rules provide that within an EA, a licensee may aggregate M-LMS spectrum in Blocks B (2.25 megahertz) and C (5.75 megahertz), for a total of 8 megahertz, but spectrum Block A (6 megahertz) may not be aggregated with these other blocks. We note that when the Commission adopted this aggregation
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-164A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-164A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-164A1.txt
  • exposure guidelines for the 2110-2155 MHz band are the same as those for spectrum at 1915-1920 MHz, 1995-2000 MHz, 2020-2025 MHz, and 2175-2180 MHz, we propose that the threshold for environmental review of fixed transmission facilities should, as a result, be an ERP greater than 1000 Watts, and that we should make any necessary modifications to sections 1.1307(b), 2.1091, and 2.1093 of our rules to include services and devices applicable to the 2155-2175 MHz band. Evaluation of mobile and portable devices in these bands will follow the rules adopted in sections 2.1091 and 2.1093, respectively. We seek comment on this proposal. Other Technical Rules; Canadian and Mexican Coordination Other Technical Rules: The application of general provisions of Part 27 would include
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-20A1.pdf
  • such a provision, any MMN control transmitter used outdoors would not be allowed to be affixed to any structure for which the height to the tip of the antenna will exceed three (3) meters (9.8 feet) above ground. This would replicate the same requirement that applies to the MedRadio Service. 49.RF safety.We note that portable devices are subject to Section 2.1093 of the rules, pursuant to which an environmental assessment must be prepared under Section 1.1307. These rule sections also govern existing MedRadio devices. Devices covered by these rules are subject to routine environmental evaluation for RF exposure prior to equipment authorization of use.54We further note, however, that our ongoing RF safety proceeding (ETDocket No. 03-137)anticipates dealing with proposed changes in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2196A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2196A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2196A1.txt
  • the County, to Marlene H. Dortch, FCC Secretary, dated February 5, 2003 at 2 (``February 5, 2003 County Letter''). See Anne Arundel County Code, Article 28, Preamble. Id., Article 28, § 1-101(14B). Id., Article 28, § 1-128(a). Id., Article 28, § 10-125(j)(l). Id., Article 28, § 10-125(k)(1). The Commission's RF emissions guidelines are set forth at 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1310, 2.1093. Anne Arundel County Code, Article 28, § 10-125(j)(2), (k)(2). See Letter from James Hobson, attorney for the County, to Marlene H. Dortch, FCC Secretary, dated August 26, 2002 (``August 26, 2002 County Letter''); Letter from Brian Fontes, Cingular Vice President, to Marlene H. Dortch, FCC Secretary, dated September 11, 2002, Attachment A (``September 11, 2002 Cingular Letter''). Specifically, in August
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-121A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-121A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-121A1.txt
  • prove that Globalstar MSS/ATC can be implemented with existing technology at low cost. 3. Compliance with Radiation Limits As required by Section 25.149(a)(5), GLLC guarantees that Globalstar ATC base stations and MSS/ATC terminals will operate in compliance with the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act incorporated in the Commission's rules, including the provisions in Sections 1.1307(b), 1.1310, 2.1091, and 2.1093 pertaining to radio-frequency radiation exposure. The base-station antennas will typically be mounted atop tall masts and will be enclosed by perimeter security fences. Standard radiation-hazard warnings will be posted, and access to areas directly in a base station's main antenna beam will be barred except as required for maintenance by authorized engineering personnel after amplifier input signals have been blocked.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2042A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2042A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2042A1.txt
  • this case does not raise safety concerns because the source-based time-averaged RF output power is below the threshold level required for SAR testing per OET equipment authorization policies, and as a general matter, part 15 spread spectrum devices are categorically excluded from routine environmental evaluation for RF exposure prior to equipment authorization or use. See 47 C.F.R. § § 1.1307(b)(1), 2.1093(c), and 15.247(i). 47 C.F.R. § 15.247(b)(4). As explained by CoachComm, the peak output powers of the initial and substitute RF modules are 69 mW and 60 mW, respectively. Because the directional corner reflector antenna has a gain of 9 dBi, however, the one watt power limit must be derated to reflect the coverage of a 6 dBi antenna. Both modules
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-38A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-38A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-38A1.txt
  • herein for any such operation. Application Exhibit 1, Attachment A at 5. Application Exhibit 1 at 7. Id. at 8 and n.17. Id. at 10. Id. at 7. Id. at 8. Id. Id. at 9. See 47 C.F.R. § 25.149(a)(1). Id. See 47 C.F.R. § 25.149(a)(3). Id. See 47 C.F.R. § 25.149(a)(4). Application Exhibit 2. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1310, 2.1093, and 25.149(a)(5). Application Exhibit 1 at 10. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.924 and 25.203(e)-(g). Id. Id. at 7-8. Inmarsat Petition at 2, citing ATC Second Reconsideration Order at ¶¶ 89-90. ATC Second Reconsideration Order at ¶87. Inmarsat Petition at 4. Accord, Sprint Nextel Reply at 13. Inmarsat Reply at 2. Id. at 5. ICO Opposition at 3-4, citing Globalstar LLC,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1600A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1600A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1600A1.txt
  • element method (FEM) computational modeling. ANSYS is the developer and marketer of High Frequency Structure Simulator (HFSS), a FEM-based software tool for simulation testing used by engineers, designers, and researchers in various industries. Section 1.1307 (b)(2) requires routine environmental evaluation for radio frequency (RF) exposure from equipment transmitting in the MedRadio Service prior to equipment certification, as specified in Section 2.1093 by laboratory measurement techniques or finite difference time domain (FDTD) computational modeling. ANSYS submits that FEM-based software is capable of simulating fundamental physics on an equal basis with FDTD-based software, and thus should be permitted for evaluating medical implant or body-worn transmitter compliance with the Commission's RF exposure rules. ANSYS notes that the IEEE International Committee for Electromagnetic Safety Technical
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2004A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2004A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2004A1.txt
  • FCC Rcd 14212, 14220 (2006); CMP-Houston KC, LLC, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 10656, 10660 n.31 (2008), citing Cloud Nine Broadcasting, Inc., Letter, 10 FCC Rcd 11555, 11556 (1995). Filed on Mar. 10, 2009. The Lay/Moore Objection noted that it ``has the same concerns'' as Matthews and agrees with her comments. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1307(b), 1.1310, 2.1091, and 2.1093. Third Matthews Objection at 2; 42 U.S.C. §§ 4321 et. seq. (1976). Second Matthews Objection at 2. Letter to the Honorable Lisa Murkowski from Julius P. Knapp, Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology (Jan. 6, 2009) (``First Congressional''); Letter to the Honorable Lisa Murkowski from Julius P. Knapp, Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology (May 12, 2009) (``Second Congressional''). The
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-676A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-676A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-676A1.txt
  • decode an enabling signal transmitted by a registered base station) citing 47 C.F.R. § 90.1333 (WTB 2007) . 47 C.F.R. § 90.1319(b). See 47 C.F.R. § 90.203(o); 3650 MHz Order, 20 FCC Rcd at 6527-28 ¶¶ 67-69 (2005). 47 C.F.R. § 90.1335 (``Licensees in the 3650-3700 MHz band are subject to the exposure requirements found in Sections 1.1307(b), 2.1091 and 2.1093 of our Rules.''). 3650 MHz Order, 20 FCC Rcd at 6519 ¶ 47. MO&O, 22 FCC Rcd at 10435 ¶ 36; 47 C.F.R. § 90.1319(c). ``Restricted'' protocols are those capable of avoiding interference only to other devices using the same protocol. MO&O, 22 FCC Rcd at 10437-38 ¶¶ 41-43. MO&O, 22 FCC Rcd at 10437-38 ¶ 43. See BreezeMAX CPE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-676A1_Rcd.pdf
  • and decode an enabling signal transmitted by a registered base station) citing 47 C.F.R. § 90.1333 (WTB 2007) . 1047 C.F.R. § 90.1319(b). 11See47 C.F.R. § 90.203(o); 3650 MHz Order, 20 FCC Rcd at 6527-28 ¶¶ 67-69 (2005). 1247 C.F.R. § 90.1335 ("Licensees in the 3650-3700 MHz band are subject to the exposure requirements found in Sections 1.1307(b), 2.1091 and 2.1093 of our Rules."). 133650 MHz Order, 20 FCC Rcd at 6519 ¶ 47. 14MO&O, 22FCC Rcd at 10435 ¶ 36; 47 C.F.R. § 90.1319(c). "Restricted" protocols are those capable of avoiding interference only to other devices using the same protocol. 15MO&O, 22FCC Rcd at 10437-38 ¶¶ 41-43. 16MO&O, 22FCC Rcd at 10437-38 ¶ 43. 3864 Federal Communications Commission DA 10-676
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1455A2_Rcd.pdf
  • existing tower or towers. An EA would also be required for changes to existing towers involving: (1) a change to steady-burning lighting; (2) a change to high-intensity white lighting in a residentially zoned neighborhood; (3) addition of lighting; or (4) human exposure to levels of radio frequency (RF) radiation in excess of the limits in 47 CFR §§ 1.1310 and 2.1093. Every EA would need to consider, in addition to other potential environmental effects, the effects that the project would have on migratory birds and Bald and Golden Eagles. Under Option A, the only projects that would be categorically excluded from preparation of an EA would be those that propose: (1) a change from red steady-burning to flashing lights or removal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-192A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-192A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-192A1.txt
  • of 47 C.F.R. § 1.1307(b)(2) of Commission Rules Declaratory Ruling Concerning Section 1.1307(b)(2) of Commission Rules ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ET Docket No. 10-166 Order Adopted: February 1, 2011 Released: February 1, 2011 By the Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology: Introduction This Order grants a waiver to ANSYS Inc. (Ansys) of Sections 1.1307(b)(2) and 2.1093 of the Commission's Rules to permit routine environmental evaluation of medical implant or body-worn equipment authorized for use in the Medical Device Radiocommunication Service (MedRadio) by finite element method (FEM) computational modeling. ANSYS requested a waiver of Section 1.1307(b)(2) to permit the use of FEM-based modeling as an alternative to the finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) technique explicitly permitted by the current
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-96-1962A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-96-1962A1.txt
  • orbit and that the first transmission to or from that satellite in the authorized spectrum band has occurred. 20. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this license grant is issued on condition that the applicant must submit, within 30 days from the release-date of this order, a showing of compliance with the applicable exposure guidelines referenced in 47 C.F.R. §2.1091 or §2.1093. as required by 47 C.F.R. §1.1307(b).12 21. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the FCC, NTIA, and FAA concerning protection of GNSS.13 that this license will be subject to any applicable out-of-band emission standards subsequently incorporated in the FCC's rules for protection of such systems in response to RTCA reports or recommendations. Pending
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-184135A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-184135A1.txt
  • the OOBE limits we adopt herein will limit such occurrences, and that in adopting these limits we have satisfied the Congressional concern to ensure that public safety licensees are protected from interference. 3. RF Safety/Power Limits 108. Background. Section 27.52 of the Commission's Rules237 subjects licensees and manufacturers to the RF radiation exposure requirements specified in Sections 1.1307(b), 2.1091, and 2.1093 of the Commission's Rules, which list the services and devices for which an environmental evaluation must be performed.258 In adopting the rule, we concluded that routine environmental evaluations for RF exposure are required for applicants desiring to use the following types of We believe that it would be more difficult for manufacturers to produce mobile and portable equipment that could
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258385A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258385A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258385A1.txt
  • March 16, 2005, the Commission released a Report and Order and Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 05-56, in the above captioned proceeding. This erratum makes the following corrections to the Report and Order and Memorandum Opinion: (a) Revise Appendix A (``Final Rules'') by deleting the references to ``Part 26'' and the ``General Wireless Communications Services'' in Sections 1.1307, 2.1091 and 2.1093 of the amended rules. (b) Revise Appendix A (``Final Rules'') by changing Section 90.1311 to read as follows: ``The license term is ten years, beginning on the date of the initial authorization (non-exclusive nationwide license) grant. Registering fixed and base stations will not change the overall renewal period of the license.'' >." (d) Revise Appendix E (``List of Grandfathered FSS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298965A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298965A1.txt
  • Applicant certifies that the facilities, operations, and transmitters for which this authorization is hereby requested are either: (1) categorically excluded from routine environmental evaluation for RF exposure as set forth in 47 C.F.R. 1.1307(b); or, (2) have been found not to cause human exposure to levels of radiofrequency radiation in excess of the limits specified in 47 C.F.R. 1.1310 and 2.1093; or, (3) are the subject of one or more Environmental Assessments filed with the Commission. 7) The Applicant certifies that it has reviewed the appropriate Commission Rules defining eligibility to hold the requested license(s), and is eligible to hold the requested license(s). 8) The Applicant certifies that it is not in default on any payment for Commission licenses and that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312921A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312921A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312921A1.txt
  • existing tower or towers. An EA would also be required for changes to existing towers involving: (1) a change to steady-burning lighting; (2) a change to high-intensity white lighting in a residentially zoned neighborhood; (3) addition of lighting; or (4) human exposure to levels of radio frequency (RF) radiation in excess of the limits in 47 CFR §§ 1.1310 and 2.1093. Every EA would need to consider, in addition to other potential environmental effects, the effects that the project would have on migratory birds and Bald and Golden Eagles. Under Option A, the only projects that would be categorically excluded from preparation of an EA would be those that propose: (1) a change from red steady-burning to flashing lights or removal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-272A1_Erratum.doc
  • proposed to remove the current 80 km coordination distance, and instead require that 24 GHz band licensees coordinate their facilities whenever their facilities have line-of-sight into other 24 GHz band licensees' facilities or are within the same geographic area. We also proposed that licensees and manufacturers be subject to the RF radiation exposure requirements specified in Sections 1.1307(b), 2.1091 and 2.1093 of the Commission's Rules. Emission Mask Many commenters suggest that the proposed emission mask requirement in Section 101.111(a)(5) is inappropriate for the 24 GHz band and request that we instead apply the emission mask set forth in Section 101.111(a)(2)(ii) of our Rules. One commenter notes that the proposed mask is too lax with regard to channel roll off and requires
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-90A1.pdf
  • spectrum, we will permit users in adjoining areas to agree to alternate field strengths at their common border to provide users increased flexibility in implementing their systems without increasing the risk of harmful interference. 99. RF Safety/Power Limits. Section 27.52 of the Commission's Rules217 subjects licensees and manufacturers to the RF radiation exposure requirements specified in Sections 1.1307(b), 2.1091, and 2.1093 of the Commission's Rules.218 In the 700 MHz First Report and Order, we adopted a threshold of 1000 w ERP for categorical exclusion from routine evaluation for RF exposure for base and fixed stations.219 We adopt this threshold for base and fixed stations in the Guard Bands, as well. As with the 30 megahertz block, the threshold for routine evaluation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-90A1_Erratum.doc
  • megahertz spectrum, we will permit users in adjoining areas to agree to alternate field strengths at their common border to provide users increased flexibility in implementing their systems without increasing the risk of harmful interference. RF Safety/Power Limits. Section 27.52 of the Commission's Rules subjects licensees and manufacturers to the RF radiation exposure requirements specified in Sections 1.1307(b), 2.1091, and 2.1093 of the Commission's Rules. In the 700 MHz First Report and Order, we adopted a threshold of 1000 w ERP for categorical exclusion from routine evaluation for RF exposure for base and fixed stations. We adopt this threshold for base and fixed stations in the Guard Bands, as well. As with the 30 megahertz block, the threshold for routine evaluation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-319A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-319A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-319A1.txt
  • In addition, section 1.1307(b) provides that Commission actions granting construction permits, licenses to transmit including renewals of licenses to transmit, equipment authorization or modification in existing facilities require the preparation of an EA if the facility, operation or transmitter would cause human exposure to levels of radio frequency radiation in excess of the limits in 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1310 and 2.1093. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1307(a)-(b), 1.1310, 2.1093. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1307(a)-(b), 1.1308, 1.1311. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1308(a) and 1.1311(a); 40 C.F.R. § 1506.5(b). 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1308(c), 1.1314-1.1319. See Petition for Rulemaking at 6. PEER proposes that the Commission adopt the following definitions: a ``private utility'' would be any facility element of a networked system required to store, supply or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-364A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-364A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-364A1.txt
  • the Commission proposed to require that facilities and devices operating in the Lower 700 MHz Band be subject to the existing RF safety criteria and procedures applicable to facilities and devices having similar technical parameters and operating characteristics. Section 27.52 of the Commission's rules subjects licensees and manufacturers to the RF radiation exposure requirements specified in Sections 1.1307(b), 2.1091, and 2.1093 of the Commission's rules, which list the services and devices for which an environmental evaluation must be performed. Other than Qwest's general support for the adoption of existing Part 27 technical rules, no other party to this proceeding addressed this issue in their comments or reply comments. Discussion. We will require transmitting facilities and devices in the Lower 700 MHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-91A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-91A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-91A1.txt
  • FNPRM at ¶¶ 21-27. See Upper 700 MHz First Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 519-20, ¶ 106; see also Upper 700 MHz MO&O and FNPRM at ¶¶ 21-27. Upper 700 MHz First Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 521-22, ¶ 111. See supra para. 43. These existing requirements are found in 47 CFR §§ 1.1307(b), 1.1310, 2.1091, 2.1093. See supra paras. 4, 14. Upper 700 MHz First Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 494, ¶ 43 n.95 (``The provision of new broadcast-type services compliant with Part 27 technical standards does not alter the underlying nature of such services, or the licensee's related regulatory and statutory obligations.'') (emphasis added). The Upper 700 MHz First Report and Order did
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-180A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-180A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-180A1.txt
  • a need for antenna gain regulation if we adopt geographic area licensing. To the extent commenters believe a minimum antenna gain requirement is necessary, we seek comment on Endwave's proposal to relax the technical parameters proposed by Loea. RF Safety. We propose that licensees and manufacturers be subject to the RF radiation exposure requirements specified in Sections 1.1307(b), 2.1091 and 2.1093 of our Rules, which list the services and devices for which an environmental evaluation must be performed. We seek comment on requiring routine environmental evaluations for RF exposure in the case of fixed operations, including base stations in cases where there is a possible safety risk if the installation of the transmitter antenna is not properly designed. We propose to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-305A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-305A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-305A1.txt
  • situations. Moreover, the Commission found the 1,000 watts ERP threshold consistent with its existing rules for transmitters and devices of comparable use and similar operating frequencies. For the same reasons, we propose to adopt the 1,000 watts ERP safety threshold for fixed operations in the 1710-1755 MHz and 2110-2155 MHz bands. We therefore propose to modify sections 1.1307(b), 2.1091, and 2.1093 of our rules to include services and devices applicable to the 1710-1755 MHz and 2110-2155 MHz bands. We invite comment on this proposal and any alternatives. Other Technical Rules; Canadian and Mexican Coordination Other Technical Rules. The application of general provisions of Part 22, 24 or 27 would include rules related to equipment authorization, frequency stability, antenna structures and air
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-40A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-40A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-40A1.txt
  • among potential subscribers, causing the pilot project to fail from lack of consumer acceptance. Arguing that its portable devices are not expected to exceed one watt in power, it contends that the Commission's current rules sufficiently protect the public. It argues that the Implementation Order should be revised to provide that portable devices shall comply with the provisions of Section 2.1093 of the Commission's rules, including the radiation exposure limitations set forth in Section 2.1093(d)(2). We agree with the petitioner that RF safety rules for digital data service devices should be consistent with existing rules for similar devices. However, similar devices that are used as subscriber transceivers and marketed to the public have been subject to labeling requirements to alert consumers
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-113A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-113A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-113A1.txt
  • and questions of control will necessarily turn on the specific circumstances of the particular arrangement. See, e.g., La Star Cellular Telephone Company, 9 FCC Rcd 7108, 7109 ¶ 13 (1994) (wireless radio case); Stereo Broadcasters, Inc., 55 FCC 2d 819, 822 ¶ 7 (1975) (broadcast case). See Section IV.A.5.a, infra. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1307(b). See also 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1310, 2.1093 (exposure limits generally applicable to all facilities, operations, and transmitters regulated by the Commission). We note that this is consistent with current policies regarding a licensee's use of its own agents to carry out certain licensee responsibilities. As we discuss below, the licensee responsibilities outlined under this new de facto control standard cannot be delegated to spectrum lessees or their
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-113A1_Erratum.doc
  • and questions of control will necessarily turn on the specific circumstances of the particular arrangement. See, e.g., La Star Cellular Telephone Company, 9 FCC Rcd 7108, 7109 ¶ 13 (1994) (wireless radio case); Stereo Broadcasters, Inc., 55 FCC 2d 819, 822 ¶ 7 (1975) (broadcast case). See Section IV.A.5.a, infra. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1307(b). See also 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1310, 2.1093 (exposure limits generally applicable to all facilities, operations, and transmitters regulated by the Commission). We note that this is consistent with current policies regarding a licensee's use of its own agents to carry out certain licensee responsibilities. As we discuss below, the licensee responsibilities outlined under this new de facto control standard cannot be delegated to spectrum lessees or their
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-132A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-132A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-132A1.txt
  • refer to a specific document, which can become outdated. Rather, we propose to include a more generic reference to Supplement C in the rules, so that as SAR evaluation guidelines are refined by experts, they can be accommodated more quickly by our procedures without waiting for rule amendment. Accordingly, for portable devices, we propose to delete the sentence in Section 2.1093(d)(3) of our rules that refers to IEEE standard C95.3-1991 and refer instead to the most current edition of Supplement C to OET Bulletin 65, issued by the Commission's Office of Engineering and Technology. For mobile devices, we propose to add a similar reference to Bulletin 65 in the introductory text of Section 2.1091(d). In addition, we propose to amend Section
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A3.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A3.txt
  • equipment authorization following the procedures set forth in subpart J of part 2 of this chapter. Equipment authorization for an individual transmitter may be requested by an applicant for a station authorization by following the procedures set forth in part 2 of this chapter. Licensees and manufacturers are subject to the radiofrequency radiation exposure requirements specified in 1.1307(b), 2.1091 and 2.1093 of this chapter, as appropriate. MSS ATC base stations must comply with the requirements specified in 1.1307(b) for PCS base stations. MSS ATC mobile terminals must comply with the requirements specified for mobile and portable PCS transmitting devices in 1.1307(b). MSS ATC mobile terminals must also comply with the requirements in 2.1091 and 2.1093 for Satellite Communications Services devices. Applications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A3_Erratum.doc
  • equipment authorization following the procedures set forth in subpart J of part 2 of this chapter. Equipment authorization for an individual transmitter may be requested by an applicant for a station authorization by following the procedures set forth in part 2 of this chapter. Licensees and manufacturers are subject to the radiofrequency radiation exposure requirements specified in 1.1307(b), 2.1091 and 2.1093 of this chapter, as appropriate. MSS ATC base stations must comply with the requirements specified in 1.1307(b) for PCS base stations. MSS ATC mobile terminals must comply with the requirements specified for mobile and portable PCS transmitting devices in 1.1307(b). MSS ATC mobile terminals must also comply with the requirements in 2.1091 and 2.1093 for Satellite Communications Services devices. Applications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-162A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-162A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-162A1.txt
  • equipment authorization following the procedures set forth in subpart J of part 2 of this chapter. Equipment authorization for an individual transmitter may be requested by an applicant for a station authorization by following the procedures set forth in part 2 of this chapter. Licensees and manufacturers are subject to the radiofrequency radiation exposure requirements specified in 1.1307(b), 2.1091 and 2.1093 of this chapter, as appropriate. MSS ATC base stations must comply with the requirements specified in 1.1307(b) for PCS base stations. MSS ATC mobile terminals must comply with the requirements specified for mobile and portable PCS transmitting devices in 1.1307(b). MSS ATC mobile terminals must also comply with the requirements in 2.1091 and 2.1093 for Satellite Communications Services devices. Applications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-191A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-191A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-191A1.txt
  • Review filed by EMR Network IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary We consider herein both the Application for Review filed by EMR Network and its Supplement to that application. Letter from Bruce A. Franca to James R. Hobson, December 11, 2001 (``Dismissal letter''). 42 U.S.C. §§ 4321 et seq. (1976). 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1307(b), 1.1310, 2.1091, and 2.1093. Report and Order in GEN Docket 79-144 (RF Report and Order I), 100 F.C.C. 2d 543 (1985); Memorandum Opinion and Order in GEN Docket 79-144, FCC 85-467, released August 22, 1985, 58 RR 2d 1128 (1985). Report and Order in ET Docket No. 93-62 (RF Report and Order II), 11 FCC Rcd 15123 (1996); Second Memorandum Opinion and Order and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-222A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-222A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-222A1.txt
  • and Applications of Broadwave USA, PDC Broadband Corporation, and Satellite Receivers, Ltd. To Provide a Fixed Service in the 12.2 - 12.7 GHz Band, Fourth Memorandum Opinion and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 8428 (2003). We note that some cellular handsets available today already approach the specific absorption rate limits specified in our rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1310, 2.1091, and 2.1093. Therefore, commenters who advocate higher power level for cellular handsets may wish to consider whether other design considerations can compensate for increased power levels so that such handsets do not violate our electromagnetic radiation exposure rules. >. >. >. Many commercial wireless licenses have site-based incumbents, including the 220 MHz, 800 MHz SMR, and paging services. 47 U.S.C. § 309(j)(4)(C).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-223A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-223A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-223A1.txt
  • met before a transmitter is authorized for operation under Section 15.231. For instance, data transmission is prohibited, except for operation under Section 15.231(e), in which case there are separate field strength level and timing requirements. Compliance with these requirements must be assured. The modular transmitter must comply with any applicable RF exposure requirements. For example, FCC Rules in Sections 2.1091, 2.1093 and specific Sections of Part 15, including 15.319(i), 15.407(f), 15.253(f) and 15.255(g), require that applicants for equipment authorization of Unlicensed PCS, U-NII and millimeter wave devices perform routine environmental evaluation for RF Exposure to demonstrate compliance. In addition, spread spectrum transmitters operating under Section 15.247 are required to address RF Exposure compliance in accordance with Section 15.247(b)(4). Modular transmitters approved
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-248A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-248A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-248A1.txt
  • operation are also appropriate for 92-95 GHz. We here create a new Section 15.257 that is based on Section 15.255 for 57-64 GHz, but reflects our limitation of unlicensed devices to indoor use. RF Safety. Background. In the NPRM, the Commission proposed that licensees and manufacturers be subject to the RF radiation exposure requirements specified in Sections 1.1307(b), 2.1091 and 2.1093 of our Rules. The Commission also asked for comments on requiring routine environmental evaluations for RF exposure in the case of fixed operations, including base stations, in cases where there is a possible safety risk if the installation of the transmitter antenna is not properly designed. Discussion. The record does not provide detailed comments concerning the issue of RF safety.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-251A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-251A1.txt
  • exposure standards for most situations. Moreover, the Commission found the 1,000 watts ERP threshold consistent with its existing rules for transmitters and devices of comparable use and similar operating frequencies. For the same reasons, we adopt the 1,000 watts ERP safety threshold for fixed operations in the 1710-1755 and 2110-2155 MHz bands. We therefore will modify sections 1.1307(b), 2.1091, and 2.1093 of our rules to include services and devices applicable to the 1710-1755 and 2110-2155 MHz bands. We note, however, that the standard we adopt today is subject to change. Canadian and Mexican Coordination Background: In the AWS Service Rules NPRM, we noted that section 2.301 of our rules requires stations using radio frequencies to identify their transmissions with a view
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-283A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-283A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-283A1.txt
  • in maritime vessels or aircraft. Most such devices are already subject to test-based equipment authorization requirements. Therefore, the mandatory certification rule that we adopt here applies only to portable earth-station transceivers not designed for installation in aircraft or maritime vessels. An FSS transceiver is portable for purposes of this rule if it is a ``portable device'' as defined in Section 2.1093 of the Commission's rules - i.e., if its radiating antenna would ordinarily be within 20 centimeters of the operator's body when the device is in use. Devices Used Only Within the United States: No Exemption. In the NPRM, the Commission asked for comment as to whether the certification rule should be limited to exclude devices of a kind that are
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-322A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-322A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-322A1.txt
  • 15.323(c)(2). This section specifies a monitoring threshold of 30 dB above the thermal noise floor for a bandwidth equivalent to the emission bandwidth for a device. While a precise emission bandwidth is not specified, this section specifies channel bandwidths of 1.25 MHz. Other numbers may well be appropriate in bands with other sharing scenarios. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.1091 and 2.1093. See generally Rural NPRM at 7, para. 10. Secondary Markets R&O/FNPRM at 37, para. 84. See generally id. at 84, paras. 221-23. Proc. 31st Telecommunications Policy Research Conference (TPRC), Sept. 2003. . The Commission's statutory authority limits its jurisdiction to the regulation of non-federal entities. Use of spectrum by federal entities is managed by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-324A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-324A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-324A1.txt
  • licensees to restrict all transmissions to the minimum practical transmission time and that communications involving the imminent safety of life or property are to be accorded priority to all licensees. As noted earlier, the Control Channel Standard is still under development. RF Exposure OBUs may operate as either a mobile or a portable transmitter with respect to Sections 2.1091 and 2.1093 of the Commission's Rules to comply with RF exposure requirements. In mobile configurations, OBU antennas are normally mounted on vehicles where the antennas can be located with sufficient distance from passengers for meeting RF exposure requirements. A separation distance of 50 cm between the antenna and persons is necessary at the maximum output of 30 W EIRP to ensure compliance.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-56A4.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-56A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-56A4.txt
  • some cases licensees may refrain from entering into such transactions to preclude potential competitors. We seek comment on whether high transaction costs or anti-competitive motivations will hinder such transactions. RF Safety The Coalition states that to implement its proposed approach, we should amend our RF emissions rules. More specifically, the Coalition contends that we should amend Sections 1.1307(b)(2), 2.1091(c) and 2.1093(c) to include MDS and ITFS services. The Commission considers RF safety procedures to be essential in protecting human beings from excessive exposure to RF energy. Accordingly, we seek comment on whether and how we should amend the RF safety rules. North American Datum (NAD) 83 Coordinate Data The Coalition notes that our rules require the submission of different coordinate data
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-56A4_Erratum.doc
  • some cases licensees may refrain from entering into such transactions to preclude potential competitors. We seek comment on whether high transaction costs or anti-competitive motivations will hinder such transactions. RF Safety The Coalition states that to implement its proposed approach, we should amend our RF emissions rules. More specifically, the Coalition contends that we should amend Sections 1.1307(b)(2), 2.1091(c) and 2.1093(c) to include MDS and ITFS services. The Commission considers RF safety procedures to be essential in protecting human beings from excessive exposure to RF energy. Accordingly, we seek comment on whether and how we should amend the RF safety rules. North American Datum (NAD) 83 Coordinate Data The Coalition notes that our rules require the submission of different coordinate data
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-99A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-99A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-99A1.txt
  • transmitter power output (TPO) limit of 33 dBm (2 watts), which would appear to provide a sufficient amount of power and the in-building penetration required. Therefore, we adopt Motorola's power limit proposals based on a spectral power density limit of 20 dBm per 1 MHz along with the antenna gain limits. Threshold Levels for Routine Environmental Evaluation. Sections 2.1091 and 2.1093 of our rules list services and devices for which an environmental evaluation for RF exposure must be routinely performed. DCCTO argues that power limits should be limited to values compatible with the RF exposure limits defined by the FCC to protect on-scene personnel. We agree. Therefore, we will require that mobile and portable equipment for use in the 4940-4990 MHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-113A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-113A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-113A1.txt
  • much smaller than a 6 MHz TV channel and/or can look for specific features of the TV signal such as the visual and audio carriers. See Notice of Proposed Rule Making and Order in ET Docket No. 03-108, 18 FCC Rcd 26859 (2003). The same characteristics would apply to both transmit and receive antenna(s). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1307(b) and 2.1093. To the extent that DTV reception capability encompassing either a demodulator and associated transport stream processor or a peripheral TSP product as defined in §73.9000(j) of the Commission's rules, were to be incorporated into such devices, they would be required to comply with the Commission's DTV redistribution control rules. See 47 C.F.R. subpart M; see also Digital Broadcast Content Protection,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-135A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-135A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-135A1.txt
  • ability of licensed operation to co-exist with unlicensed operations in the 2500-2655 MHz band, we see no reason to maintain this restriction in this band. RF Safety The Coalition's proposal for revisions to the 2500-2690 MHz band includes a recommendation that we amend our RF Safety rules. More specifically, the Coalition contends that we should amend Sections 1.1307(b)(2), 2.1091(c) and 2.1093(c) to include MDS and ITFS services. These Rules were enacted pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act in order to assure the protection of human health and safety from radio frequency radiation exposure. The Commission considers RF safety procedures to be essential in protecting human beings from excessive exposure to RF energy. Accordingly, we sought comment on whether and how
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-218A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-218A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-218A1.txt
  • the exposure guidelines for 1710-1755 and 2110-2155 MHz bands are the same as those for spectrum at 1915-1920 MHz, 1995-2000 MHz, 2020-2025 MHz, and 2175-2180 MHz, we tentatively conclude that the threshold for environmental review of fixed transmission facilities should be an ERP greater than 1000 watts, and that we should make any necessary modifications to sections 1.1307(b), 2.1091, and 2.1093 of our rules to include services and devices applicable to the 1915-1920 MHz, 1995-2000 MHz, 2020-2025 MHz, and 2175-2180 MHz bands. Evaluation of mobile and portable devices in these bands will follow the rules adopted in sections 2.1091 and 2.1093, respectively. We seek comment on this tentative conclusion. Other Technical Rules; Canadian and Mexican Coordination Other Technical Rules: The application
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-56A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-56A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-56A1.txt
  • Wireless Communications Service, the Maritime Services (ship earth stations only), the Specialized Mobile Radio Service, and the 3650MHz Wireless Broadband Service authorized under Subpart H of parts 22, 24, 25, 26, 27, 80, and 90 of this chapter are subject to routine environmental evaluation for RF exposure prior to equipment authorization or use, as specified in Sec. Sec. 2.1091 and 2.1093 of this chapter. Unlicensed PCS, unlicensed NII and millimeter wave devices are also subject to routine environmental evaluation for RF exposure prior to equipment authorization or use, as specified in Sec. Sec. 15.253(f), 15.255(g), 15.319(i), and 15.407(f) of this chapter. Portable transmitting equipment for use in the Wireless Medical Telemetry Service (WMTS) is subject to routine environment evaluation as specified
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-156A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-156A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-156A1.txt
  • the transmission of control or signaling information or the use of repetitive codes used by certain digital technologies to complete frame or burst intervals. Applicants shall include in their application for equipment authorization a description of how this requirement is met. (d) TV band devices are subject to the radio frequency radiation exposure requirements specified in §§ 1.1307(b), 2.1091 and 2.1093 of this chapter, as appropriate. All equipment shall be considered to operate in a "general population/uncontrolled" environment. Applications for equipment authorization of devices operating under this section must contain a statement confirming compliance with these requirements for both fundamental emissions and unwanted emissions. Technical information showing the basis for this statement must be submitted to the Commission upon request. (e)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-164A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-164A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-164A1.txt
  • Section 1.1307(b) provides that Commission actions granting construction permits, licenses to transmit or renewals thereof, equipment authorizations, or modifications in existing facilities require the preparation of an EA if the particular facility, operation or transmitter would cause human exposure to levels of radiofrequency (RF) emissions in excess of the guidelines that the Commission has adopted. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1310, 2.1093. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1306(a). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1307(c), (d). Under Section 1.1307(c), an interested person may petition the Bureau responsible for processing a particular action to require environmental consideration, where such consideration would not otherwise be required by the rules. If the Bureau determines that the action may have a significant environmental impact, it will require that an EA be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-24A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-24A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-24A1.txt
  • proposals that would provide more flexibility to M-LMS than current rules. We also seek comment on whether allowing these stations to operate using such technologies at higher power levels than permitted generally under Section 15.247 would raise any questions related to human exposure to electromagnetic radiation and whether they therefore should be subject to the procedures of Sections 2.1091 and 2.1093. C. M-LMS Spectrum Aggregation Limit The Commission's Part 90 M-LMS rules provide that within an EA, a licensee may aggregate M-LMS spectrum in Blocks B (2.25 megahertz) and C (5.75 megahertz), for a total of 8 megahertz, but spectrum Block A (6 megahertz) may not be aggregated with these other blocks. We note that when the Commission adopted this aggregation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-164A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-164A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-164A1.txt
  • exposure guidelines for the 2110-2155 MHz band are the same as those for spectrum at 1915-1920 MHz, 1995-2000 MHz, 2020-2025 MHz, and 2175-2180 MHz, we propose that the threshold for environmental review of fixed transmission facilities should, as a result, be an ERP greater than 1000 Watts, and that we should make any necessary modifications to sections 1.1307(b), 2.1091, and 2.1093 of our rules to include services and devices applicable to the 2155-2175 MHz band. Evaluation of mobile and portable devices in these bands will follow the rules adopted in sections 2.1091 and 2.1093, respectively. We seek comment on this proposal. Other Technical Rules; Canadian and Mexican Coordination Other Technical Rules: The application of general provisions of Part 27 would include
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-56A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-56A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-56A1.txt
  • met before a transmitter is authorized for operation under Section 15.231. For instance, data transmission is prohibited, except for operation under Section 15.231(e), in which case there are separate field strength level and timing requirements. Compliance with these requirements must be assured. The modular transmitter must comply with any applicable RF exposure requirements. For example, FCC Rules in Sections 2.1091, 2.1093 and specific Sections of Part 15, including 15.319(i), 15.407(f), 15.253(f), 15.255(g) and 15.257(g) require that applicants for authorization of Unlicensed PCS, U-NII and millimeter wave devices perform a routine environmental evaluation for RF exposure to demonstrate compliance. In addition, applicants for authorization of spread spectrum transmitters operating under Section 15.247 are required to address RF exposure compliance in accordance with
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-258A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-258A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-258A1.txt
  • of the Commission's order [adopting new location accuracy standards], an industry group to evaluate methodologies for assessing wireless E9-1-1 location accuracy for calls originating indoors and report back to the Commission within one year.'' Id. See Verizon Wireless November 3, 2008 Ex Parte Letter at 2. See id. 42 U.S.C. §§ 4321 et seq. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1307(b), 1.1310, 2.1091, 2.1093. Responsibility of the Federal Communications Commission to Consider Biological Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation when Authorizing the Use of Radiofrequency Devices; Potential Effects of a Reduction in the Allowable Level of Radiofrequency Radiation on FCC-Authorized Communications Services and Equipment, Report and Order, 100 FCC 2d 543 (1985) (``RF Report & Order''); on reconsideration, FCC 85-467, 58 RR 2d 1128 (Aug. 22,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-260A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-260A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-260A1.txt
  • on these techniques but is near a fixed device or another personal/portable device that can act as a master, it could operate in client mode if it makes contact with a master station. With respect to RF exposure, we first observe that personal/portable TV band devices could operate as either ``mobile'' or ``portable'' devices as defined in Sections 2.1091 and 2.1093 of the rules, respectively. Under Section 2.1091, a mobile device is a transmitter designed to be used in other than fixed locations and to generally be used in such a way that a separation distance of at least 20 centimeters is normally maintained between the transmitter's radiating structure(s) and the body of the user or other nearby persons. Such devices
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-85A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-85A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-85A1.txt
  • also August 700 MHz Order, 22 FCC Rcd at 15417-18. See, e.g., April 700 MHz Order, 22 FCC Rcd at 8103. As we explain above (see supra note 100), licensees will remain subject to our existing environmental regulations. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1307 and 1.1310; id. § 2.1091 (governing RF radiation exposure evaluation specifically for mobile devices); id. § 2.1093 (governing RF radiation exposure evaluation specifically for portable devices). This requirement applies to PCS/AWS base stations and mobile/portable units alike. We also clarify that the calculation method that AWS licensees must use if they choose to continue measuring power in terms of peak values rather than average is the same method currently specified for PCS licensees. See 47 C.F.R. §
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-20A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-20A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-20A1.txt
  • a provision, any MMN control transmitter used outdoors would not be allowed to be affixed to any structure for which the height to the tip of the antenna will exceed three (3) meters (9.8 feet) above ground. This would replicate the same requirement that applies to the MedRadio Service. RF safety. We note that portable devices are subject to Section 2.1093 of the rules, pursuant to which an environmental assessment must be prepared under Section 1.1307. These rule sections also govern existing MedRadio devices. Devices covered by these rules are subject to routine environmental evaluation for RF exposure prior to equipment authorization of use. We further note, however, that our ongoing RF safety proceeding (ET Docket No. 03-137) anticipates dealing with
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-23A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-23A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-23A1.txt
  • * * * (b) * * * (2) * * * Equipment authorized for use in the Medical Device Radiocommunication Service (MedRadio) as a medical implant or body-worn transmitter (as defined in Appendix 1 to Subpart E of part 95 of this chapter) is subject to routine environmental evaluation for RF exposure prior to equipment authorization, as specified in § 2.1093 of this chapter by finite difference time domain computational modeling or laboratory measurement techniques. Where a showing is based on computational modeling, the Commission retains the discretion to request that specific absorption rate measurement data be submitted. All other mobile, portable, and unlicensed transmitting devices are categorically excluded from routine environmental evaluation for RF exposure under §§ 2.1091, 2.1093 of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-57A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-57A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-57A1.txt
  • more practical in other frequency bands to follow the approach of the present MedRadio rules by which temporary outdoor antennas are permitted? We invite commenters to address the relative advantages and disadvantages of either approach for MBAN use in any of the frequency bands under consideration in this proceeding. RF safety. We note that portable devices are subject to Section 2.1093 of the rules, pursuant to which an environmental assessment must be prepared under Section 1.1307. These rule sections also govern existing MedRadio devices. Devices covered by these rules are subject to routine environmental evaluation for RF exposure prior to equipment authorization. We further note, however, that in our ongoing RF safety proceeding (ET Docket No. 03-137) we anticipate dealing with
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-64A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-64A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-64A1.txt
  • us to apply the same rules to VMES as are applicable to VSATs. Raysat, SIA, and General Dynamics, for example, assert that VMES terminals will not be located within 20 centimeters of the body of a user or nearby person when the terminal is transmitting and thus by definition are not ``portable earth station transceivers'' pursuant to sections 25.129 and 2.1093 of the Commission's rules. General Dynamics observes that the Commission's rules do not require equipment certification for FSS Ku-band terminals, including ESVs authorized under section 25.222. It asserts that VMES terminals should be considered more analogous to FSS Ku-band VSAT operations than ancillary terrestrial components (``ATC'') because ATC operations reasonably can be expected to result in radiating structures within 20
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-106A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-106A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-106A1.txt
  • on a case-by-case basis, for the higher powered portable GMRS devices, particularly those with very thin body worn accessories. In order to apply RF exposure standards that are appropriate for GMRS hand-held portable transmitters that are used by the public, we propose to require routine SAR evaluation for portable GMRS devices to meet the General Population/Uncontrolled exposure limits of section 2.1093(d)(2) of the Commission's rules within 60 days of the effective date of the Order that adopts such changes. We seek comment on this proposal. We also seek comment on whether GMRS devices operating in mobile exposure conditions should continue to be categorically excluded from routine evaluation of human RF exposure for all power levels. In the same context, we seek
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-106A1_Rcd.pdf
  • of Part 95 of the Commission's Rules to Establish a Very Short Distance Two-way Voice Radio Service, Order, RM-10564, DA 04-1035, released April 21, 2004. 6547 C.F.R. § 90.267(b)(2)(i). 66Staff review performed on January 5, 2010 by searching the equipment authorization database at http://www.fcc.gov/oet.ea for GMRS handheld portable radios. 67SeeIndustry Canada Radio Standards Specification RSS-210 at A6.2.4. 6847 C.F.R. § 2.1093. 7663 Federal Communications Commission FCC 10-106 transmitters was based on certain assumptions concerning their operating configurations in mobile exposure conditions (e.g., vehicular mobile installation where the antenna is away from the body, see §2.1091) combined with a low transmit duty cycle (ratio of transmit time to receive time), particularly for "push-to-talk" type operations.69As noted above, our current rules have allowed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-110A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-110A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-110A1.txt
  • a 2182 kHz watch receiver for all vessels, and amended a number of rules accordingly. It inadvertently neglected to remove the references to 2182 kHz watch receivers in the aforementioned rules, however, and we now rectify that omission. We also take this opportunity to correct the inadvertent removal of the qualifying parenthetical phrase ``(ship earth station devices only)'' from Section 2.1093(c) of the Rules in the Federal Register summary of the rule amendments adopted in 2003 in the Memorandum Opinion and Third Report and Order in WT Docket No. 00-32. In addition, to both streamline Part 80 and facilitate the future incorporation by reference in Part 80 of additional or updated international standards, in accord with the policies of the Office
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-197A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-197A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-197A1.txt
  • such an arrangement, we could require the designation of a single person who would be able to respond to interference complaints and who holds the authority to stop any ongoing tests. , supra. We note that all experiments must comply with the Commission's RF safety rules limiting human exposure to RF radiation. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1307(b), 1.1310, 1.1091 and 2.1093. . Given the particular importance of advancing health care and the immense potential that many new medical device proposals hold, we want to find ways to avoid having to evaluate arguments that are based solely on paper filings and theoretical calculations. See e.g., MedRadio Report and Order. The National Institutes of Health in describing its policy for the sharing of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-36A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-36A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-36A1.txt
  • See 47 C.F.R. § 90.403(e) (licensees shall take reasonable precautions to avoid causing harmful interference; this includes monitoring the transmitting frequency for communications in progress and such other measures as may be necessary to minimize the potential for causing interference). See Motorola comments at 5. See 47 C.F.R. § 90.247(c). See 47 C.F.R. § 90.205. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.1901, 2.1093; see also 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1307, 1.1310. See Motorola comments at 5. See 47 C.F.R. § 90.247(f). Some commenters expressed concern over the length of the delay. See FIT comments at 5-6; Sprint Nextel comments at 3-4; PCIA comments at 4-5; EWA reply comments at 4. See Amendment of Parts 1 and 90 of the Commission's Rules Concerning the Construction,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-82A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-82A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-82A1.txt
  • way that a separation distance of at least 20 centimeters is normally maintained between the transmitter's radiating structure(s) and the body of the user or nearby persons. 47 C.F.R. § 2.1091. A portable device is defined as a transmitting device where the radiating structure(s) of the device is/are within 20 centimeters of the body of the user. 47 C.F.R. § 2.1093. TDD is a radio communications technology where a single radio frequency band is divided into timeslots and used for uplink (i.e., user device) and downlink (i.e., base station) transmissions. Duty cycle (also known as duty factor) is the percentage of a transmission frame that a WCS user device uses to transmit uplink information to the base station (i.e., the ``on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-82A1_Rcd.pdf
  • in such a way that a separation distance of at least 20 centimeters is normally maintained between the transmitter's radiating structure(s) and the body of the user or nearby persons. 47 C.F.R. § 2.1091. A portable device is defined as a transmitting device where the radiating structure(s) of the device is/are within 20 centimeters of the body of the user. 47C.F.R.§2.1093. 2TDD is a radio communications technology where a single radio frequency band is divided into timeslots and used for uplink (i.e., user device) and downlink (i.e., base station) transmissions. 3Duty cycle (also known as duty factor) is the percentage of a transmission frame that a WCS user device uses to transmit uplink information to the base station (i.e., the "on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-176A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-176A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-176A1.txt
  • programmer/controller to locations on or in close proximity to the patient. Because the rules will effectively restrict MMNs to portable body-worn devices and preclude the use of fixed antennas, we conclude that it is unnecessary for us to adopt a new rule containing these restrictions.. RF Safety. In the NPRM, the Commission noted that portable devices are subject to Section 2.1093 of its rules, pursuant to which an environmental assessment must be prepared under Section 1.1307, and that these rule sections also govern existing MedRadio devices. The Commission further noted that its ongoing RF safety proceeding (ET Docket No. 03-137) anticipated dealing with proposed changes in the Commission's rules regarding human exposure to RF electromagnetic fields in a more comprehensive fashion.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-181A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-181A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-181A1.txt
  • 1.1307(a). Under Section 1.1307(b), a Commission action granting a construction permit, license to transmit (including a renewal of a license to transmit), equipment authorization, or modification in existing facilities requires preparation of an EA if the proposed facility, operation, or transmitter would cause human exposure to radiofrequency radiation in excess of the limits specified in 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1310 and 2.1093. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1307(b). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1308. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.1312 (requiring Commission applicants and licensees to perform environmental review of proposed actions requiring no other preconstruction Commission authorization). We note, however, that licensees and applicants must consider effects on migratory birds that are listed or proposed as endangered or threatened species under the ESA. 47 C.F.R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-181A1_Rcd.pdf
  • 1.1307(a). Under Section 1.1307(b), a Commission action granting a construction permit, license to transmit (including a renewal of a license to transmit), equipment authorization, or modification in existing facilities requires preparation of an EA if the proposed facility, operation, or transmitter would cause human exposure to radiofrequency radiation in excess of the limits specified in 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1310 and 2.1093. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1307(b). 3947 C.F.R. § 1.1308. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.1312 (requiring Commission applicants and licensees to perform environmental review of proposed actions requiring no other preconstruction Commission authorization). 40We note, however, that licensees and applicants must consider effects on migratory birds that are listed or proposed as endangered or threatened species under the ESA. 47 C.F.R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-53A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-53A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-53A1.txt
  • RF Exposure. As discussed above, we propose to apply the relevant Part 22, 24, 27 or 90 mobile station technical requirements to signal boosters. In addition, we propose to prohibit signal boosters that are designed to be used so that the radiating structure(s) is/are within 20 centimeters of the user or other persons, as defined for portable devices in section 2.1093(b). Thus, we propose to permit only fixed and mobile signal boosters, which will be governed by the RF exposure rules regarding how the devices are deployed. The RF exposure rules in sections 1.1307 and 2.1091 outline exposure limits, equipment authorization requirements, and other regulatory requirements that are based on the type of device, how it is deployed or used, the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-79A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-79A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-79A1.txt
  • temperature range -20 to +50 degrees Celsius with an input voltage variation of 85% to 115% of rated input voltage, unless justification is presented to demonstrate otherwise. (e) Regardless of the power density levels permitted under this section, devices operating under the provisions of this section are subject to the radiofrequency radiation exposure requirements specified in §§ 1.1307(b), 2.1091 and 2.1093 of this chapter, as appropriate. Applications for equipment authorization of devices operating under this section must contain a statement confirming compliance with these requirements for both fundamental emissions and unwanted emissions. Technical information showing the basis for this statement must be submitted to the Commission upon request. APPENDIX B Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-54A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-54A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-54A1.txt
  • to MBAN hub devices without modification. Because no MBAN sensor will be implanted, we further conclude that the 25°C to 45°C range we have used for implanted devices should not apply to sensors. Instead we will use the broader 0°C to 55°C specification. RF Safety. In the NPRM, we noted that portable radiofrequency (RF) transmitting devices are subject to Section 2.1093 of the Rules, pursuant to which an environmental assessment concerning human exposure to RF electromagnetic fields must be prepared under Section 1.1307, and that these rule sections also govern existing MedRadio devices. We also noted that the Commission has an open RF safety proceeding (ET Docket No. 03-137) in which it proposed to conduct a comprehensive review of its rules
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-7A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-7A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-7A1.txt
  • authorization rules generally require all test reports to be signed by the person who performed or supervised the tests. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.911(d) and (e). The party responsible for equipment compliance must retain a copy of the ECIG Implementation Guide test results, as specified in section 2.938. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.938 See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.1091(c) and 2.1093(c) (requiring that certification applications for mobile and portable devices, respectively, associated with various services to include with their certification applications a statement confirming compliance with applicable radiofrequency radiation exposure limits); 47 C.F.R. § 80.231(e) (requiring that certification applications for maritime Class B Automatic Identification System equipment include a letter from the U.S. Coast Guard stating that the device meets certain
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-333A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-333A1.pdf
  • in the United States will be subject to any agreements reached with Canada and Mexico. We are in the process of holding discussions with these countries to determine the types of coordination that would be necessary. 2. RF Safety 41. We propose that licensees and manufacturers be subject to the RF radiation exposure requirements specified in Sections 1.1307(b), 2.1091, and 2.1093 of the Commission's Rules, which lists the services and devices for which an environmental evaluation must be performed. We tentatively conclude that routine environmental evaluations for RF exposure should be required in the case of fixed operations, including base stations, when the effective radiated power (ERP) is greater than 1,000 watts. 42. We propose to treat services and devices in
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01091.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01091.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01091.txt
  • FNPRM at ¶¶ 21-27. See Upper 700 MHz First Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 519-20, ¶ 106; see also Upper 700 MHz MO&O and FNPRM at ¶¶ 21-27. Upper 700 MHz First Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 521-22, ¶ 111. See supra para. 43. These existing requirements are found in 47 CFR §§ 1.1307(b), 1.1310, 2.1091, 2.1093. See supra paras. 4, 14. Upper 700 MHz First Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 494, ¶ 43 n.95 (``The provision of new broadcast-type services compliant with Part 27 technical standards does not alter the underlying nature of such services, or the licensee's related regulatory and statutory obligations.'') (emphasis added). The Upper 700 MHz First Report and Order did
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fcc97303.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fcc97303.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fcc97303.wp
  • facilities for which licensees and applicants are required to conduct an initial, routine environmental evaluation to determine whether these transmitting facilities comply with our RF guidelines.29 See 47 CFR § 1.1307(b)(1). Our rules also identify certain types of mobile and portable transmitting devices that are subject to routine environmental evaluation prior to equipment authorization. See 47 CFR §§ 2.1091(c) and 2.1093(c). As for transmitting facilities and devices not specifically identified under 47 CFR §§ 1.1307(b)(1), 2.1091(c) or 2.1093(c), we have determined, based on calculations, measurement data, and other information, that such transmitting facilities offer little potential for causing exposure in excess of the applicable guidelines, and thus have "categorically excluded" those transmitters from the initial, routine environmental evaluation requirement.30 41. In
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fcc98338.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fcc98338.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fcc98338.wp
  • the band 1559-1605 MHz shall be limited to -70 dBW / MHz averaged over any 20 millisecond period for wideband signals, and a standard of -80 dBW across within the measurement bandwidth of 700 Hz or less for narrowband signals. (d) Licensees and manufacturers are subject to the radiofrequency radiation exposure requirements specified in § 1.1307(b), § 2.1091 and § 2.1093 of this chapter, as appropriate. Applications for equipment authorization of mobile or portable devices operating under this section shall contain a statement confirming compliance with these requirements for both fundamental emissions and unwanted emissions. Technical information showing the basis for this statement shall be submitted to the Commission upon request. (e) Equipment authorizations issued pursuant to this section will be
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00211.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00211.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00211.txt
  • the General Wireless Communications Service, the Wireless Communications Service, the Maritime Services (ship earth stations only) and the Specialized Mobile Radio Service authorized under Subpart H of Parts 22, 24, 25, 26, 27, 80, and 90 of this chapter are subject to routine environmental evaluation for RF exposure prior to equipment authorization or use, as specified in §§ 2.1091 and 2.1093 of this chapter. Unlicensed PCS, unlicensed NII and millimeter wave devices are also subject to routine environmental evaluation for RF exposure prior to equipment authorization or use, as specified in §§ 15.253(f), 15.255(g), 15.319(i), and 15.407(f) of this chapter. Portable transmitting equipment for use in the Wireless Medical Telemetry Service (WMTS) is subject to routine environment evaluation as specified in
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99097.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99097.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99097.wp
  • a general matter.121 To implement sharing between conventional broadcast and other commercial services, different interference limits may be indicated. We request comment on this proposal and any other emission limits that commenters believe are appropriate. 3.RF Safety 70. Section 27.52 of the Commission's Rules122 subjects licensees and manufacturers to the RF radiation exposure requirements specified in Sections 1.1307(b), 2.1091, and 2.1093 of the Commission's Rules, which list the services and devices for which an environmental evaluation must Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-97 123 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1307(b), 2.1091, 2.1093. The RF radiation exposure limits are set forth in 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1310, 2.1091, and 2.1093, as modified in Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation, ET Docket No. 93-62,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00005.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00005.txt
  • believe that the OOBE limits we adopt herein will limit such occurrences, and that in adopting these limits we have satisfied the Congressional concern to ensure that public safety licensees are protected from interference. RF Safety/Power Limits Background. Section 27.52 of the Commission's Rules subjects licensees and manufacturers to the RF radiation exposure requirements specified in Sections 1.1307(b), 2.1091, and 2.1093 of the Commission's Rules, which list the services and devices for which an environmental evaluation must be performed. In adopting the rule, we concluded that routine environmental evaluations for RF exposure are required for applicants desiring to use the following types of transmitters: (1) fixed operations, including base stations and radiolocation transmitters, when the effective radiated power (ERP) is greater
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00090.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00090.txt
  • megahertz spectrum, we will permit users in adjoining areas to agree to alternate field strengths at their common border to provide users increased flexibility in implementing their systems without increasing the risk of harmful interference. RF Safety/Power Limits. Section 27.52 of the Commission's Rules subjects licensees and manufacturers to the RF radiation exposure requirements specified in Sections 1.1307(b), 2.1091, and 2.1093 of the Commission's Rules. In the 700 MHz First Report and Order, we adopted a threshold of 1000 w ERP for categorical exclusion from routine evaluation for RF exposure for base and fixed stations. We adopt this threshold for base and fixed stations in the Guard Bands, as well. As with the 30 megahertz block, the threshold for routine evaluation
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2042A1.html
  • this case does not raise safety concerns because the source-based time-averaged RF output power is below the threshold level required for SAR testing per OET equipment authorization policies, and as a general matter, part 15 spread spectrum devices are categorically excluded from routine environmental evaluation for RF exposure prior to equipment authorization or use. See 47 C.F.R. S: S: 1.1307(b)(1), 2.1093(c), and 15.247(i). 47 C.F.R. S: 15.247(b)(4). As explained by CoachComm, the peak output powers of the initial and substitute RF modules are 69 mW and 60 mW, respectively. Because the directional corner reflector antenna has a gain of 9 dBi, however, the one watt power limit must be derated to reflect the coverage of a 6 dBi antenna. Both modules
• http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/rfsafety.html
  • of 300 kHz to 100 GHz. In addition, the Commission adopted the specific absorption rate (SAR) limits for devices operating within close proximity to the body as specified within the ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992 guidelines. (See [40]Report and Order, FCC 96-326) The Commission's requirements are detailed in Parts 1 and 2 of the FCC's Rules and Regulations [47 C.F.R. 1.1307(b), 1.1310, 2.1091, 2.1093]. The potential hazards associated with RF electromagnetic fields are discussed in [41]OET Bulletin No. 56, "Questions and Answers About the Biological Effects and Potential Hazards of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields." [42]More Info.... Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Human Exposure to RF * [43]Radiofrequency Energy FAQs This section contains answers to the most frequently asked questions received by the Commission concerning RF fields
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/fo9750.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/fo9750.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/fo9750.wp
  • to be adopted shortly in a Report and Order Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-50 See Establishment of Rules and Policies for the Digital Audio Radio Satellite Service in the 2310-2360 MHz Frequency 338 Band, IB Docket No. 95-91, GEN Docket No. 90-357, Notice of Proposed Rule Making, 11 FCC Rcd 1 (1995). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1301, 1.1307(b), 2.1091, and 2.1093. The RF radiation exposure limits are set forth in 47 C.F.R. 339 §§ 1.1310, 2.1091, and 2.1093, as applicable. For the purposes of our RF safety rules, mobile devices are defined as transmitters designed to be used in other than fixed 340 locations and to generally be used in such a way that a separation distance of at least 20
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/wcsbip.pdf
  • Signal Levels. For purposes of partitioning and disaggregation, WCS systems must be designed so as not to exceed a signal level of 47 dBµV/m at the Licensees and manufacturers are subject to the radio licensee's service area boundary, unless the affected frequency radiation exposure requirements specified in adjacent service area licensees have agreed to a different sections 1.1307(b), 2.1091, and 2.1093 of this chapter, as signal level. See section 27.55. appropriate. Applications for equipment authorization of (c) Unjust Enrichment. mobile or portable devices operating under this section (1) Bidding Credits. Licensees that received must contain a statement confirming compliance with a bidding credit and partition their licenses or these requirements for both fundamental emissions and disaggregate their spectrum to entities not
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/22/releases/pcsbipg.pdf
  • is required to submit a statement affirming that the equipment complies with these standards as measured by an approved method and to maintain a record showing the basis for the statement of compliance with IEEE C.95.1- 1991. § 24.52 RF hazards. Licensees and manufacturers are subject to the radiofrequency radiation exposure requirements specified in § 1.1307(b), § 2.1091 and § 2.1093 of this chapter, as appropriate. Applications for equipment authorization of mobile or portable devices operating under this section must contain a statement confirming compliance with these requirements for both fundamental emissions and unwanted emissions. Technical information showing the basis for this statement must be submitted to the Commission upon request. § 24.53 Calculation of height above average terrain (HAAT). (a)
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/31/releases/fc000005.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/31/releases/fc000005.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/31/releases/fc000005.txt
  • believe that the OOBE limits we adopt herein will limit such occurrences, and that in adopting these limits we have satisfied the Congressional concern to ensure that public safety licensees are protected from interference. RF Safety/Power Limits Background. Section 27.52 of the Commission's Rules subjects licensees and manufacturers to the RF radiation exposure requirements specified in Sections 1.1307(b), 2.1091, and 2.1093 of the Commission's Rules, which list the services and devices for which an environmental evaluation must be performed. In adopting the rule, we concluded that routine environmental evaluations for RF exposure are required for applicants desiring to use the following types of transmitters: (1) fixed operations, including base stations and radiolocation transmitters, when the effective radiated power (ERP) is greater
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/33/releases/fc000090.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/33/releases/fc000090.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/33/releases/fc000090.txt
  • megahertz spectrum, we will permit users in adjoining areas to agree to alternate field strengths at their common border to provide users increased flexibility in implementing their systems without increasing the risk of harmful interference. RF Safety/Power Limits. Section 27.52 of the Commission's Rules subjects licensees and manufacturers to the RF radiation exposure requirements specified in Sections 1.1307(b), 2.1091, and 2.1093 of the Commission's Rules. In the 700 MHz First Report and Order, we adopted a threshold of 1000 w ERP for categorical exclusion from routine evaluation for RF exposure for base and fixed stations. We adopt this threshold for base and fixed stations in the Guard Bands, as well. As with the 30 megahertz block, the threshold for routine evaluation
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/44/releases/fc010364.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/44/releases/fc010364.txt
  • the Commission proposed to require that facilities and devices operating in the Lower 700 MHz Band be subject to the existing RF safety criteria and procedures applicable to facilities and devices having similar technical parameters and operating characteristics.312 Section 27.52 of the Commission's rules313 subjects licensees and manufacturers to the RF radiation exposure requirements specified in Sections 1.1307(b), 2.1091, and 2.1093 of the Commission's rules,314 which list the services and devices for which an environmental evaluation must be performed. Other than Qwest's general support for the adoption of existing Part 27 technical rules, no other party to this 307 See supra Section III.B.2.a.i. 308 When applicable, this requirement includes notification to Part 27 commercial and guard band manager licensees operating on
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/46/releases/fc020152.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/46/releases/fc020152.txt
  • application of our Part 27 technical rule standards with two significant exceptions: 1) the threshold levels for routine environmental evaluations listed in Section 1.1307 of our rules, and 2) the applicability of AM disturbance requirements of Section 27.63 of our rules.375 We consider each of ArrayComm's proposals in turn. 113. Threshold Levels for Routine Environmental Evaluation. Sections 1.1307(b), 2.1091 and 2.1093 of our rules list services and devices for which an environmental evaluation for RF exposure must be routinely performed.376 Section 1.1307(b) requires an environmental evaluation for all Part 27 fixed stations operating at an EIRP of 1640 watts or greater.377 Sections 2.1091 and 2.1093 require routine environmental evaluation for all Part 27 mobile and portable devices.378 ArrayComm requests that we
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/56/releases/fc000272.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/56/releases/fc000272.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/56/releases/fc000272.txt
  • proposed to remove the current 80 km coordination distance, and instead require that 24 GHz band licensees coordinate their facilities whenever their facilities have line-of-sight into other 24 GHz band licensees' facilities or are within the same geographic area. We also proposed that licensees and manufacturers be subject to the RF radiation exposure requirements specified in Sections 1.1307(b), 2.1091 and 2.1093 of the Commission's Rules. Emission Mask Many commenters suggest that the proposed emission mask requirement in Section 101.111(a)(5) is inappropriate for the 24 GHz band and request that we instead apply the emission mask set forth in Section 101.111(a)(2)(ii) of our Rules. One commenter notes that the proposed mask is too lax with regard to channel roll off and requires
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/index.htm?job=service_home&id=wireless_medical_telemetry
  • from the radiating structures of a device and a person's body. Since medical telemetry devices are typically worn on the body of the patient, it is expected that most WMTS devices will be classified as portable transmitters and will therefore be required to demonstrate RF exposure compliance with respect to the SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) limit (specified in 47 C.F.R. 2.1093). Nonetheless, there may be situations in which the WMTS device is mounted on a patient bed or incorporated within a separate device that is more than 20 centimeters away from the patient and nearby persons. In those cases, the WMTS device will not be required to undergo routine evaluation to demonstrate RF exposure compliance because, as a consequence of the
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/siting/fact2.pdf
  • actions listed in paragraph (a) of this section, Commission actions granting construction permits, licenses to transmit or renewals thereof, equipment authorizations or modifications in existing facilities, require the preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA) if the particular facility, operation or transmitter would cause human exposure to levels of radiofrequency radiation in excess of the limits in § 1.1310 and § 2.1093 of this chapter. Applications to the Commission for construction permits, licenses to transmit or renewals thereof, equipment authorizations or modifications in existing facilities must contain a statement confirming compliance with the limits unless the facility, operation, or transmitter is categorically excluded, as discussed below. Technical information showing the basis for this statement must be submitted to the Commission upon request.
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/releases/DA002644.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/releases/DA002644.pdf
  • applicant certifies that the facilities, operations, and transmitters for which this authorization is hereby requested are either: (1) categorically excluded from routine environmental evaluation for RF exposure as set for in 47 C.F.R. 1.1307(b); or, (2) have been found not to cause human exposure to levels of radiofrequency radiation in excess of the limits specified in 47 C.F.R. 1.1310 and 2.1093; or, (3) are the subject of one or more Environmental Assessments filed with the Commission.'' Schedule B Changes Market/Channel Block Item 5-For each market and channel block won in auction, applicants must indicate whether they intend to seek a tribal lands bidding credit by checking the appropriate box. Tribal Lands Information . Note: It is anticipated that this information will
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2000/fcc00103.doc
  • modulation characteristics, occupied bandwidth, spurious emissions at antenna terminals, field strength of spurious emissions and frequency stability. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.1046 through 2.1055. For the purpose of safety, certain transmitters designed to operate within 20 cm of the user are subject to limits on the specific absorption rate (SAR) of radiofrequency energy by the body. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.1093. For further information on software authentication, see N. Doraswamy and D. Harris, IPSEC: The New Security Standard for the Internet, Intranets, and Virtual Private Networks, Prentice Hall, 1999, p. 12-17 and Computer Science and Telecommunications Board, National Research Council, Trust in Cyberspace, National Academy Press, 1999, p. 122-126 See 47 C.F.R. § 2.925. Under the current rules, changes to an
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01091.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01091.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01091.txt
  • FNPRM at ¶¶ 21-27. See Upper 700 MHz First Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 519-20, ¶ 106; see also Upper 700 MHz MO&O and FNPRM at ¶¶ 21-27. Upper 700 MHz First Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 521-22, ¶ 111. See supra para. 43. These existing requirements are found in 47 CFR §§ 1.1307(b), 1.1310, 2.1091, 2.1093. See supra paras. 4, 14. Upper 700 MHz First Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 494, ¶ 43 n.95 (``The provision of new broadcast-type services compliant with Part 27 technical standards does not alter the underlying nature of such services, or the licensee's related regulatory and statutory obligations.'') (emphasis added). The Upper 700 MHz First Report and Order did
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1996/fcc96326.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1996/fcc96326.txt
  • actions listed in paragraph (a) of this section, Commission actions granting construction permits, licenses to transmit or renewals thereof, equipment authorizations or modifications in existing facilities, require the preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA) if the particular facility, operation or transmitter would cause human exposure to levels of radiofrequency radiation in excess of the limits in § 1.1310 and § 2.1093 of this chapter. Applications to the Commission for construction permits, licenses to transmit or renewals thereof, equipment authorizations or modifications in existing facilities must contain a statement confirming compliance with the limits unless the facility, operation, or transmitter is categorically excluded, as discussed below. Technical information showing the basis for this statement must be submitted to the Commission upon request.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fcc97303.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fcc97303.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fcc97303.wp
  • facilities for which licensees and applicants are required to conduct an initial, routine environmental evaluation to determine whether these transmitting facilities comply with our RF guidelines.29 See 47 CFR § 1.1307(b)(1). Our rules also identify certain types of mobile and portable transmitting devices that are subject to routine environmental evaluation prior to equipment authorization. See 47 CFR §§ 2.1091(c) and 2.1093(c). As for transmitting facilities and devices not specifically identified under 47 CFR §§ 1.1307(b)(1), 2.1091(c) or 2.1093(c), we have determined, based on calculations, measurement data, and other information, that such transmitting facilities offer little potential for causing exposure in excess of the applicable guidelines, and thus have "categorically excluded" those transmitters from the initial, routine environmental evaluation requirement.30 41. In
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fcc98338.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fcc98338.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1998/fcc98338.wp
  • the band 1559-1605 MHz shall be limited to -70 dBW / MHz averaged over any 20 millisecond period for wideband signals, and a standard of -80 dBW across within the measurement bandwidth of 700 Hz or less for narrowband signals. (d) Licensees and manufacturers are subject to the radiofrequency radiation exposure requirements specified in § 1.1307(b), § 2.1091 and § 2.1093 of this chapter, as appropriate. Applications for equipment authorization of mobile or portable devices operating under this section shall contain a statement confirming compliance with these requirements for both fundamental emissions and unwanted emissions. Technical information showing the basis for this statement shall be submitted to the Commission upon request. (e) Equipment authorizations issued pursuant to this section will be
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00211.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00211.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00211.txt
  • the General Wireless Communications Service, the Wireless Communications Service, the Maritime Services (ship earth stations only) and the Specialized Mobile Radio Service authorized under Subpart H of Parts 22, 24, 25, 26, 27, 80, and 90 of this chapter are subject to routine environmental evaluation for RF exposure prior to equipment authorization or use, as specified in §§ 2.1091 and 2.1093 of this chapter. Unlicensed PCS, unlicensed NII and millimeter wave devices are also subject to routine environmental evaluation for RF exposure prior to equipment authorization or use, as specified in §§ 15.253(f), 15.255(g), 15.319(i), and 15.407(f) of this chapter. Portable transmitting equipment for use in the Wireless Medical Telemetry Service (WMTS) is subject to routine environment evaluation as specified in
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00363.doc
  • to draw the attention of terrestrial service equipment manufacturers and prospective bidders to the technical specifications, for Federal Government radiolocation systems that operate in the 3100-3700 MHz band, that are contained in the NTIA Radiolocation Report. RF Safety Section 27.52 of the Commission's rules subjects licensees and manufacturers to the RF radiation exposure requirements specified in Sections 1.1307(b), 2.1091, and 2.1093 of the Commission's rules, which list the services and devices for which an environmental evaluation must be performed. In adopting the rule, the Commission concluded that routine environmental evaluations for RF exposure are required by applicants desiring to use the following types of transmitters: (1) fixed operations, including base stations and radiolocation transmitters, when the effective radiated power (ERP) is
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Public_Notices/2000/da000705.doc
  • routine environmental evaluation for demonstrating RF exposure compliance with respect to MPE and/or SAR limits. These devices are not exempted from compliance. As indicated in Section 15.247(b)(4), these transmitters are required to operate in a manner that ensures that exposure to the public (users and nearby persons) does not exceed the Commission's RF exposure guidelines (see Sections 1.1307, 2.1091 and 2.1093). Unless a device operates at substantially low output power levels, with a low gain antenna(s), supporting information is generally needed to establish the various potential operating configurations and exposure conditions of a transmitter and its antenna(s), in order to determine compliance with the RF exposure guidelines. In order to demonstrate compliance with MPE requirements (see Section 2.1091), the following information
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Public_Notices/2000/da001407.doc
  • before a transmitter is authorized for operation under Section 15.231. For instance, data transmission is prohibited, except for operation under Section 15.231(e), in which case there are separate field strength level and timing requirements. Compliance with these requirements must be assured. 8. The modular transmitter must comply with any applicable RF exposure requirements. For example, FCC Rules in Sections 2.1091, 2.1093 and specific Sections of Part 15, including 15.319(i), 15.407(f), 15.253(f) and 15.255(g), require that Unlicensed PCS, UNII and millimeter wave devices perform routine environmental evaluation for RF Exposure to demonstrate compliance. In addition, spread spectrum transmitters operating under Section 15.247 are required to address RF Exposure compliance in accordance with Section 15.247(b)(4). Modular transmitters approved under other Sections of Part
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Orders/1997/fcc97050.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Orders/1997/fcc97050.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Orders/1997/fcc97050.wp
  • Use of the WCS spectrum for DARS services 337 Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-50 See Establishment of Rules and Policies for the Digital Audio Radio Satellite Service in the 2310-2360 MHz 338 Frequency Band, IB Docket No. 95-91, GEN Docket No. 90-357, Notice of Proposed Rule Making, 11 FCC Rcd 1 (1995). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1301, 1.1307(b), 2.1091, and 2.1093. The RF radiation exposure limits are set forth in 47 339 C.F.R. §§ 1.1310, 2.1091, and 2.1093, as applicable. For the purposes of our RF safety rules, mobile devices are defined as transmitters designed to be used in other than 340 fixed locations and to generally be used in such a way that a separation distance of at least 20
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99097.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99097.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99097.wp
  • a general matter.121 To implement sharing between conventional broadcast and other commercial services, different interference limits may be indicated. We request comment on this proposal and any other emission limits that commenters believe are appropriate. 3.RF Safety 70. Section 27.52 of the Commission's Rules122 subjects licensees and manufacturers to the RF radiation exposure requirements specified in Sections 1.1307(b), 2.1091, and 2.1093 of the Commission's Rules, which list the services and devices for which an environmental evaluation must Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-97 123 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1307(b), 2.1091, 2.1093. The RF radiation exposure limits are set forth in 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1310, 2.1091, and 2.1093, as modified in Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation, ET Docket No. 93-62,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99333.doc
  • in the United States will be subject to any agreements reached with Canada and Mexico. We are in the process of holding discussions with these countries to determine the types of coordination that would be necessary. 2. RF Safety 41. We propose that licensees and manufacturers be subject to the RF radiation exposure requirements specified in Sections 1.1307(b), 2.1091, and 2.1093 of the Commission's Rules, which lists the services and devices for which an environmental evaluation must be performed. We tentatively conclude that routine environmental evaluations for RF exposure should be required in the case of fixed operations, including base stations, when the effective radiated power (ERP) is greater than 1,000 watts. 42. We propose to treat services and devices in
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00005.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00005.txt
  • believe that the OOBE limits we adopt herein will limit such occurrences, and that in adopting these limits we have satisfied the Congressional concern to ensure that public safety licensees are protected from interference. RF Safety/Power Limits Background. Section 27.52 of the Commission's Rules subjects licensees and manufacturers to the RF radiation exposure requirements specified in Sections 1.1307(b), 2.1091, and 2.1093 of the Commission's Rules, which list the services and devices for which an environmental evaluation must be performed. In adopting the rule, we concluded that routine environmental evaluations for RF exposure are required for applicants desiring to use the following types of transmitters: (1) fixed operations, including base stations and radiolocation transmitters, when the effective radiated power (ERP) is greater
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00090.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00090.txt
  • megahertz spectrum, we will permit users in adjoining areas to agree to alternate field strengths at their common border to provide users increased flexibility in implementing their systems without increasing the risk of harmful interference. RF Safety/Power Limits. Section 27.52 of the Commission's Rules subjects licensees and manufacturers to the RF radiation exposure requirements specified in Sections 1.1307(b), 2.1091, and 2.1093 of the Commission's Rules. In the 700 MHz First Report and Order, we adopted a threshold of 1000 w ERP for categorical exclusion from routine evaluation for RF exposure for base and fixed stations. We adopt this threshold for base and fixed stations in the Guard Bands, as well. As with the 30 megahertz block, the threshold for routine evaluation
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00272.doc
  • proposed to remove the current 80 km coordination distance, and instead require that 24 GHz band licensees coordinate their facilities whenever their facilities have line-of-sight into other 24 GHz band licensees' facilities or are within the same geographic area. We also proposed that licensees and manufacturers be subject to the RF radiation exposure requirements specified in Sections 1.1307(b), 2.1091 and 2.1093 of the Commission's Rules. Emission Mask Many commenters suggest that the proposed emission mask requirement in Section 101.111(a)(5) is inappropriate for the 24 GHz band and request that we instead apply the emission mask set forth in Section 101.111(a)(2)(ii) of our Rules. One commenter notes that the proposed mask is too lax with regard to channel roll off and requires
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2011/dd110202.html
  • the information was correct and accurate. By Order. Action by: Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 02/01/2011 by NALF. (DA No. 11-184). EB [80]DA-11-184A1.doc [81]DA-11-184A1.pdf [82]DA-11-184A1.txt ANSYS INC. REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF 47 C.F.R. SECTIONS 1.1307(B) (2) OF COMMISSION RULES; DECLARATORY RULING CONCERNING SECTIONS 1.1307(B)(2) OF COMMISSION RULES. Granted a waiver to ANSYS Inc. of Sections 1.1307(b)(2) and 2.1093 of the Commission's Rules. (Dkt No. 10-166 ). Action by: Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology. Adopted: 02/01/2011 by ORDER. (DA No. 11-192). OET [83]DA-11-192A1.doc [84]DA-11-192A1.pdf [85]DA-11-192A1.txt References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304384A1.doc 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304384A1.pdf 3. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304384A1.txt 4. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304372A1.pdf 5. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304372A1.txt 6. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304370A1.pdf 7. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304370A1.txt 8. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304374A1.pdf 9. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304374A2.txt 10. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304373A1.pdf 11. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304373A2.txt 12. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304410A1.pdf 13. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304410A1.txt 14. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304411A1.pdf 15. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304411A1.txt 16. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304406A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/Forms/Form601/601ps.pdf
  • Applicant certifies that the facilities, operations, and transmitters for which this authorization is hereby requested are either: (1) categorically excluded from routine environmental evaluation for RF exposure as set forth in 47 C.F.R. 1.1307(b); or, (2) have been found not to cause human exposure to levels of radiofrequency radiation in excess of the limits specified in 47 C.F.R. 1.1310 and 2.1093; or, (3) are the subject of one or more Environmental Assessments filed with the Commission. 7) The Applicant certifies that it has reviewed the appropriate Commission Rules defining eligibility to hold the requested license(s), and is eligible to hold the requested license(s). 8) The Applicant certifies that it is not in default on any payment for Commission licenses and that
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2042A1.html
  • this case does not raise safety concerns because the source-based time-averaged RF output power is below the threshold level required for SAR testing per OET equipment authorization policies, and as a general matter, part 15 spread spectrum devices are categorically excluded from routine environmental evaluation for RF exposure prior to equipment authorization or use. See 47 C.F.R. S: S: 1.1307(b)(1), 2.1093(c), and 15.247(i). 47 C.F.R. S: 15.247(b)(4). As explained by CoachComm, the peak output powers of the initial and substitute RF modules are 69 mW and 60 mW, respectively. Because the directional corner reflector antenna has a gain of 9 dBi, however, the one watt power limit must be derated to reflect the coverage of a 6 dBi antenna. Both modules
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-03-2196A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-03-2196A1.pdf
  • the County, to Marlene H. Dortch, FCC Secretary, dated February 5, 2003 at 2 (``February 5, 2003 County Letter''). See Anne Arundel County Code, Article 28, Preamble. Id., Article 28, § 1-101(14B). Id., Article 28, § 1-128(a). Id., Article 28, § 10-125(j)(l). Id., Article 28, § 10-125(k)(1). The Commission's RF emissions guidelines are set forth at 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1310, 2.1093. Anne Arundel County Code, Article 28, § 10-125(j)(2), (k)(2). See Letter from James Hobson, attorney for the County, to Marlene H. Dortch, FCC Secretary, dated August 26, 2002 (``August 26, 2002 County Letter''); Letter from Brian Fontes, Cingular Vice President, to Marlene H. Dortch, FCC Secretary, dated September 11, 2002, Attachment A (``September 11, 2002 Cingular Letter''). Specifically, in August
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-2004A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-2004A1.pdf
  • FCC Rcd 14212, 14220 (2006); CMP-Houston KC, LLC, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 10656, 10660 n.31 (2008), citing Cloud Nine Broadcasting, Inc., Letter, 10 FCC Rcd 11555, 11556 (1995). Filed on Mar. 10, 2009. The Lay/Moore Objection noted that it ``has the same concerns'' as Matthews and agrees with her comments. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1307(b), 1.1310, 2.1091, and 2.1093. Third Matthews Objection at 2; 42 U.S.C. §§ 4321 et. seq. (1976). Second Matthews Objection at 2. Letter to the Honorable Lisa Murkowski from Julius P. Knapp, Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology (Jan. 6, 2009) (``First Congressional''); Letter to the Honorable Lisa Murkowski from Julius P. Knapp, Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology (May 12, 2009) (``Second Congressional''). The
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-06-164A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-06-164A1.pdf
  • Section 1.1307(b) provides that Commission actions granting construction permits, licenses to transmit or renewals thereof, equipment authorizations, or modifications in existing facilities require the preparation of an EA if the particular facility, operation or transmitter would cause human exposure to levels of radiofrequency (RF) emissions in excess of the guidelines that the Commission has adopted. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1310, 2.1093. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1306(a). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1307(c), (d). Under Section 1.1307(c), an interested person may petition the Bureau responsible for processing a particular action to require environmental consideration, where such consideration would not otherwise be required by the rules. If the Bureau determines that the action may have a significant environmental impact, it will require that an EA be
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/rfsafety/Welcome.html
  • of 300 kHz to 100 GHz. In addition, the Commission adopted the specific absorption rate (SAR) limits for devices operating within close proximity to the body as specified within the ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992 guidelines. (See [40]Report and Order, FCC 96-326) The Commission's requirements are detailed in Parts 1 and 2 of the FCC's Rules and Regulations [47 C.F.R. 1.1307(b), 1.1310, 2.1091, 2.1093]. The potential hazards associated with RF electromagnetic fields are discussed in [41]OET Bulletin No. 56, "Questions and Answers About the Biological Effects and Potential Hazards of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields." [42]More Info.... Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Human Exposure to RF * [43]Radiofrequency Energy FAQs This section contains answers to the most frequently asked questions received by the Commission concerning RF fields
• http://www.fcc.gov/oet/rfsafety/background.html
  • frequencies of 300 kHz to 100 GHz. In addition, the Commission adopted the specific absorption rate (SAR) limits for devices operating within close proximity to the body as specified within the ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992 guidelines.(See [24]Report and Order, FCC 96-326) The Commission's requirements are detailed in Parts 1 and 2 of the FCC's Rules and Regulations [47 C.F.R. 1.1307(b), 1.1310, 2.1091, 2.1093]. Certain applicants are required to routinely perform an environmental evaluation with respect to determining compliance with the Commission's exposure limits. In the event that an applicant determines the site is not within compliance, the submission of an Environmental Analysis is required. The SAR limits for portable and mobile devices became effective August 7, 1996. The Commission's limits for field strength