FCC Web Documents citing 2.803

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1271A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1271A1.pdf
  • 2007 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Richard Mann d/b/a The Antique Radio Collector apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted apparent violations involve marketing of uncertified AM radio transmitters. background . Mr. Mann has sold a number of completed units to end users since December 2003. discussion Section 302(b) of the Act provides that ``[n]o person shall manufacture, import, sell, offer for sale, or ship devices or home electronic equipment and systems, or
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1313A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1313A1.pdf
  • March 16, 2007 By the Regional Director, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000) to Charles E. Vance, III d/b/a CB Candy Electronics (``Vance''), for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Commissions Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 2.815(c) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). On March 22, 2006, the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of $14,000 to Vance for offering for sale non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceivers and external RF power amplifiers in Ontario, California. In this Order, we affirm the findings of the Los
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1673A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1673A1.pdf
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that Audio Direct is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1674A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1674A1.pdf
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that Buy.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'')
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1675A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1675A1.pdf
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that Audio Discounters is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1676A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1676A1.pdf
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that Ambient Weather is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1753A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1753A1.pdf
  • 812 Kings Highway Saugerties, NY 12477 Re: File No. EB-06-SE-365 Dear Mr. Krein: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Section 2.803 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. � 2.803; for importing radio frequency devices that do not meet one or more of the specified import conditions in violation of Section 2.1204(a) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1204(a); and for being unable to document compliance with the selected import conditions in violation of Section 2.1204(b) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1754A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1754A1.pdf
  • or Madam: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States a police radar jamming device manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-C450 device, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that Chumbo.com is marketing the RMR-C450 device. The Division staff observed that Chumbo.com was not marketing the RMR-S201 device at that time. The Division
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1756A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1756A1.pdf
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that CompSource, Inc. is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1757A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1757A1.pdf
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that Cybergiftcenter.com, Inc. is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1758A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1758A1.pdf
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that Dealznet.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'')
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1760A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1760A1.pdf
  • Vitec Group Communications Limited (``Vitec''). Vitec seeks reconsideration of a Forfeiture Order issued by the Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') to Vitec on October 31, 2006, which assessed a forfeiture of eleven thousand two hundred dollars ($11,200) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted violations involve Vitec's marketing of unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. II. BACKGROUND In May 2005, the Bureau received a complaint alleging that Clear-Com Communication Systems was marketing unapproved radiofrequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a) of the Rules. Specifically, the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1763A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1763A1.pdf
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. TheElectronicCompany.com and observed that TheElectronicCompany.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1764A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1764A1.pdf
  • Mr. Berkowitz: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States a police radar jamming device manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-C450 device, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. Focuscamera.com and observed that Focus Camera, Inc. is marketing the RMR-C450 device. The Division staff observed that Focus Camera, Inc. was not marketing the RMR-S201 device
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1766A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1766A1.pdf
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that Fadfusion is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'')
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1767A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1767A1.pdf
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. DSMiller.com and observed that DSMiller.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1784A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1784A1.pdf
  • by AboCom Systems, Inc. (``AboCom''). Abocom seeks reconsideration of a Forfeiture Order issued by the Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau on November 7, 2006, in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000). In the Forfeiture Order, the Division found willful and repeated violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), involving AboCom's marketing of wireless access points that do not comply with the terms of its equipment authorization and the requirements of Section 15.247(d) of the Rules. background In 2005, the Division received a report from Industry Canada indicating that a wireless access point marketed under an equipment certification granted to AboCom, FCC ID MQ4ARM94,
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1789A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1789A1.pdf
  • 20, 2007 Released: April 24, 2007 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau and Trimble Navigation, Limited (``TNL''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Enforcement Bureau into whether TNL violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 2.803 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), regarding the manufacture, importation, marketing and sale of unlicensed wireless devices. The Enforcement Bureau and TNL have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve this matter and terminate the investigation. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. In the absence of new material evidence, we
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2994A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2994A1.pdf
  • an official CITATION, issued to Mr. Lance McCuistion, d/b as LM Services and Scorpion Jammer Technology (``Scorpion'') pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States, specifically, the Scorpion ``Ultimate'' KA Jammer and Scorpion Jammer devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). In addition, you have failed to respond to directives of the Enforcement Bureau to provide certain information and documents. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On June 14, 2005, December 15, 2006, and January 25, 2007, staff from the Spectrum Enforcement Division observed on your
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-299A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-299A1.pdf
  • Released: January 31, 2007 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted apparent violations involve RMR's marketing of its RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 models of police radar jamming devices (``jammers''). background The Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information, through several informal complaints, alleging that RMR was manufacturing and marketing unauthorized police radar jammers in the United States. The Division's
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-304A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-304A1.pdf
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Auto-Radar-Detectors.com, were marketing police radar jamming
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-307A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-307A1.pdf
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Best Radar Detectors, were marketing police
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-308A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-308A1.pdf
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803 and 15.205. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. , and observed that Electronic Retail Solutions, Inc. was marketing the RMR-S201 (also known as the Phazer II) and the RMR-C450 devices. On September 1, 2005, the Division
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-309A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-309A1.pdf
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Global Trade Group, Inc., were marketing
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-310A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-310A1.pdf
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Hoeffener International, were marketing police radar
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-311A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-311A1.pdf
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803 and 15.205. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Radar Detectors Direct, were marketing police radar jamming
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-312A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-312A1.pdf
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Radarjammers.com, were marketing police radar jamming
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-313A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-313A1.pdf
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803 and 15.205. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including The Twister Group, Inc., were marketing police radar
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-321A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-321A1.pdf
  • Lane Williamsville, NY 14221 Re: File No. EB-05-SE-174 Dear Mr. Struckmeyer: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Section 2.803 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. � 2.803. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that DreamBox USA was importing and marketing unauthorized direct broadcast satellite receivers, the DreamBox DM500-S (``DM500-S'') and the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3266A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3266A1.pdf
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Overseas Best Buy, Inc. dba 110220volts.com is marketing
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3270A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3270A1.pdf
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Unbeatablesale.com, Inc. is marketing the RMR-S201 and the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3392A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3392A1.pdf
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. shopperschoice.com and observed that ShoppersChoice.com, LLC is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3393A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3393A1.pdf
  • Dear Sir/Madam: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-C450 device, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. shopila.com and observed that Shopila Corporation is marketing the RMR-C450 device. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'')
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3483A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3483A1.pdf
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that Gain Saver is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3599A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3599A1.pdf
  • FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: August 14, 2007 Released: August 16, 2007 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) against Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR'') for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted violations involve RMR's marketing of its RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 models of police radar jamming devices. On January 31, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of $25,000 to RMR. RMR has not filed a response to the NAL. Based on
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3974A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3974A1.pdf
  • � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain wireless cameras and wireless camera converters, specifically, 10 Watt, 1.2 GHz Cantek Wireless Camera and Camera Converter Transmitter Receivers (``1.2 GHz wireless camera transmitter receivers''), that are not eligible to receive a grant of equipment certification, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communication Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803 and 15.205(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 6, 2007, staff in the Enforcement Bureau's Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') visited the internet store for Surveillance-Video products, www.surveillance-video.com (``Surveillance-Video online store''). The Surveillance-Video online store listed
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4374A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4374A1.pdf
  • October 26, 2007 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Microwave Radio Communications LLC (``MRC'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 90.203 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted apparent violations involve the marketing of uncertified 4.9 GHz aeronautical transmitting equipment (``4.9 GHz equipment''). background On January 10, 2007, the Commission's Office of Engineering and Technology (``OET'') sent a letter to MRC in response to allegations that it may be manufacturing and marketing uncertified 4.9 GHz equipment. In its response
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4449A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4449A1.pdf
  • N. Camac Street Philadelphia, PA 19133 Re: File No. EB-06-SE-222 Dear Mr. King: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Section 2.803 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. � 2.803. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry dated March 28, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau (``the Division'') initiated an investigation into whether Basic Home Shopping is marketing in the United
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-452A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-452A1.pdf
  • FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: January 31, 2007 Released: February 2, 2007 By the Regional Director, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000) to Jason Kaltenbach (``Kaltenbach'') d/b/a Metamerchant, for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 302(b) of the Commissions Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted violation includes offering for sale non-certified VHF and UHF transceivers in Laguna Nigel, California. 2. On November 9, 2006, the District Director of the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of $14,000 to Kaltenbach. Despite repeated contacts by the Los Angeles Office,
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4570A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4570A1.pdf
  • Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Liam Patrick Ryan d/b/a L. P. Ryan / Low Power Radio (``Low Power Radio'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted apparent violations involve marketing of uncertified AM radio transmitters. background On May 30, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Enforcement Bureau issued a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to Low Power Radio in response to information that Low Power Radio was marketing in the United States fully-assembled AM transmitters; specifically, the SSTRAN model
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4716A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4716A1.pdf
  • November 27, 2007 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Richard Mann d/b/a The Antique Radio Collector (``Antique Radio Collector'') for willful and repeated violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted violations involve Antique Radio Collector's marketing of uncertified AM radio transmitters. background Section 302(b) of the Act provides that ``[n]o person shall manufacture, import, sell, offer for sale, or ship devices or home electronic equipment and systems, or use devices, which fail to comply with regulations promulgated pursuant to this section.'' Section 2.803(a)(1)
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4874A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4874A1.pdf
  • No. EB-07-SE-194 Dear Mr. Melo: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), to BRD Security Products, Inc. d/b/a Spybase.com (``BRD'') for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803 and 15.205(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry dated October 9, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau (``the Division'') initiated an investigation into whether BRD is marketing in
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4894A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4894A1.pdf
  • means the 4.9 GHz Carry-Coder II COFDM Digital Wireless Camera System. (f) ``Commission'' and ``FCC'' mean the Federal Communications Commission. (g) ``Effective Date'' means the date on which the Bureau releases the Adopting Order. (h) ``Investigation'' means the investigation commenced by the Bureau's May 23, 2007 Letter of Inquiry regarding whether BMS violated Section 302(b) of the Act and/or Section 2.803 of the Rules. (i) ``Parties'' means BMS and the Bureau. (j) ``Rules'' means the Commission's Rules found in Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations. III. BACKGROUND 3. BMS manufactures and distributes the Carry-Coder II (``CCII'') COFDM Digital Wireless Camera System that operates in the 4.9 GHz band. The CCII System provides law enforcement and public safety agencies with
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-808A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-808A1.pdf
  • Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau and Communications Specialists, Inc. (``CSI''). The Consent Decree terminates the forfeiture proceeding initiated by the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Enforcement Bureau against CSI for its possible violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The Enforcement Bureau and CSI have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve this matter and terminate the forfeiture proceeding. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. Based on the record before us, we conclude that no substantial or material questions of fact exist with respect
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-881A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-881A1.pdf
  • Director, South Central Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Ben Metzger dba 1 Stop Communications / 1 Stop CB Shop in Titusville, Florida for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted violation involves Mr. Metzger's offering for sale non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceivers. II. BACKGROUND On March 21, 2006, the Commission's Tampa Office of the Enforcement Bureau (``Tampa Office'') issued Mr. Metzger / 1 Stop Communications / 1 Stop CB Shop a Citation for marketing at his store in Titusville non-certified CB transceivers, including
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1193A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1193A1.pdf
  • Victor McCormack Phonejammer.com Re: File No. EB-07-SE-031 Dear Mr. McCormack: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), to Phonejammer.com (``Phonejammer'') for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and section 2.803 of the Commission's rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. � 2.803, and for failing to respond to Enforcement Bureau directives to provide certain information and documents. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry (``LOI'') dated November 6, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Commission's
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1196A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1196A1.pdf
  • File No. EB-08-SE-202 Dear Mr. Bassler: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), to David Steele Enterprises, Inc. (``David Steele'') for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803 and 15.205(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry of inquiry (``LOI'') dated May 15, 2008, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau (``Division'') initiated an investigation into whether David Steele
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1202A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1202A1.pdf
  • Kittridge Street #12 Reseda, California 91335-6164 Re: File No. EB-08-SE-203 Dear Mr. Henry: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803 and 15.205(a), and for failing to fully respond to Enforcement Bureau directives to provide certain information and documents. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry (``LOI'') dated May 16, 2008, the Spectrum Enforcement
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1299A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1299A1.pdf
  • Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of six hundred ten dollars ($610) to Liam Patrick Ryan d/b/a L. P. Ryan / Low Power Radio (``Low Power Radio'') for the willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted violation involves Low Power Radio's marketing of uncertified AM radio transmitters. BACKGROUND On May 30, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau issued a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to Low Power Radio in response to information alleging that Low Power Radio was marketing in the United States fully-assembled AM transmitters;
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-155A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-155A1.pdf
  • Dear Ms. and Mr. Bollaro: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), to Garden State Investigations and Security (``Garden State'') for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803 and 15.205(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry dated October 2, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau (``Division'') initiated an investigation into whether Garden State is marketing in
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-167A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-167A1.pdf
  • Released: January 29, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Ryzex, Inc. (``Ryzex'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of eight thousand dollars ($8,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted apparent violations involve Ryzex's marketing of noncompliant portable data terminals (``PDTs''). II. BACKGROUND The Enforcement Bureau's Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') received a complaint alleging that Ryzex had modified PDTs manufactured by Symbol Technologies, Inc. (``Symbol'') by replacing their two megabytes per second (``mbps'') radio assemblies with 11 mbps radio assemblies without authorization from
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1685A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1685A1.pdf
  • RECEIPT REQUESTED Vladimir Reznik, Owner RangeVideo Re: File No. EB-08-SE-182 Dear Mr. Reznik: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. � 2.803 and 15.205(a), and importing radio frequency devices without filing FCC Form 740 (or the electronic equivalent) with the United States Customs and Border Patrol, in violation of Section 1.1203 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1203. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1754A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1754A1.pdf
  • Kersnowski d/b/a www.radioactiveradios.com Salem, Oregon ) ) ) ) ) ) File Number: EB-08-PO-0044 NAL/Acct. No.: 200832920002 FRN: 0017594524 FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: July 28, 2008 Released: July 30, 2008 By the Regional Director, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: , in Salem, Oregon, for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted violations involve Kersnowski's marketing and offering for sale non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceivers. 2. On March 28, 2008, the Resident Agent of the Enforcement Bureau's Portland Resident Agent Office issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of $7,000 to Kersnowski for offering for sale non-certified CB transceivers in
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1937A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1937A1.pdf
  • August 25, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Microboards Technology, LLC (``Microboards'') is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The apparent violations involve marketing unauthorized and non-compliant digital devices in the United States. background The Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Microboards was marketing the Orbit 3 Disc Duplicator, and the MicroOrbit Disc Duplicator digital video disc (``DVD'') and/or compact disc (``CD'') duplicators in the United States
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1951A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1951A1.pdf
  • August 25, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Leetek America, Inc. (``Leetek'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000) for willful and repeated violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted apparent violations involve Leetek's marketing of two unauthorized pager transmitter systems. II. BACKGROUND . The pager transmitter systems involved in this matter must be authorized by the Commission via the certification process prior to being marketed in, or imported into, the United States. Further, users of these systems must obtain licenses from the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1952A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1952A1.pdf
  • 25, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Data Capture Solutions, Inc. (``DCS'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of four thousand dollars ($4,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted apparent violations involve DCS's marketing of noncompliant portable data terminals (``PDTs''). II. BACKGROUND The Enforcement Bureau's Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') received a complaint alleging that DCS had modified a PDT manufactured by Symbol Technologies, Inc. (``Symbol'') by replacing the two megabytes per second (``mbps'') radio assembly with an 11 mbps radio assembly without
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2042A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2042A1.pdf
  • 2008 Released: September 8, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find CoachComm, LLC (``CoachComm'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for willful and repeated violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted apparent violations involve the marketing of an unauthorized radio frequency device. background On August 15, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Enforcement Bureau (``Division'') received a complaint regarding CoachComm's manufacture and marketing of a wireless intercom system under the trade name Connex that uses a belt pack and base station configuration. The
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2051A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2051A1.pdf
  • Maurine Lane Grand Junction, CO 81504 Re: File No. EB-08-SE-034 Dear Mr. Marston: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Section 2.803 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. � 2.803. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry (``LOI'') dated June 3, 2008, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau (``the Division'') initiated an investigation into whether MicroVideoX, LLC, (``MicroVideoX'') is marketing in the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2052A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2052A1.pdf
  • September 11, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Wavetrend Technologies, Ltd. (``Wavetrend''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Wavetrend for possible violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') regarding the marketing of certain radio frequency identification devices. The Bureau and Wavetrend have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find that
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2437A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2437A1.pdf
  • 4, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find XLNT Idea, Inc. (``XLNT Idea'') is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000) for willful and repeated violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The apparent violations involve marketing unauthorized digital devices in the United States. background The Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that XLNT Idea was marketing the Nexis 100AP AutoPrinter, the Nexis 100AP Publisher, and the Xi440 CD/DVD Printer in the United States without the appropriate labels as required in
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2673A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2673A1.pdf
  • Released: December 10, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Multi-Tech Systems, Inc. (``Multi-Tech'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of four thousand dollars ($4,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.105(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted apparent violations involve Multi-Tech's marketing of a radio frequency device without including the required consumer disclosure in the user manual. BACKGROUND Multi-Tech is a manufacturer of communications and device networking products that provide voice and data services over internet protocol networks. One of its products, the CallFinder(R) Global System for Mobile
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2734A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2734A1.pdf
  • 23, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Redflex Traffic Systems, Inc. (``Redflex''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Redflex for possible violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803(a), 2.925, 15.19, 15.201 and 90.203 of the Commission's rules (``Rules'') regarding the marketing and use of two models of radar speed meter equipment. The Bureau and Redflex have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-472A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-472A1.pdf
  • February 29, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find DBK Concepts, Inc. (``DBK'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted apparent violations involve DBK's marketing of noncompliant portable data terminals (``PDTs''). II. BACKGROUND The Enforcement Bureau's Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') received a complaint alleging that DBK had modified PDTs manufactured by Symbol Technologies, Inc. (``Symbol'') by replacing their two megabytes per second (``mbps'') radio assemblies with 11 mbps radio assemblies without authorization from
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-528A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-528A1.pdf
  • 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Memorandum Opinion and Order, we admonish Global Microwave Systems, Inc. (``GMS'') for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices, specifically, uncertified 4.9 GHz aeronautical transmitting equipment (``4.9 GHz equipment''), in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 90.203 of the Commission's rules (``rules''). II. BACKGROUND GMS manufactures and markets microwave radio systems and other devices. On January 10, 2007, the Commission's Office of Engineering and Technology (``OET'') sent a letter to GMS in response to allegations that it may be manufacturing and marketing uncertified 4.9 GHz equipment. In its response to OET's letter, GMS acknowledged that
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-597A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-597A1.pdf
  • 21, 2008 By the Regional Director, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to CB Shop & More, LLLP ("CB Shop"), in Loveland, Colorado, for willful and repeated violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). On August 28, 2007, the Enforcement Bureau's Denver Office issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') to CB Shop after determining that CB Shop offered for sale a non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceiver. In this Order, we consider CB Shop's argument that the CB transceiver at issue did not require Commission certification. II.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-74A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-74A1.pdf
  • South 1675 West Orem, UT 84058 Re: File No. EB-07-SE-250 Dear Mr. Royer: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and section 2.803 of the Commission's rules (``rules''), 47 C.F.R. � 2.803. In addition, you have failed to respond to directives of the Enforcement Bureau to provide certain information and documents. As explained below, future violations of these rules may subject Absolute Toy Marketing, Inc. to monetary forfeitures. After receiving a complaint, the Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau began an
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-968A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-968A1.pdf
  • Mann d/b/a The Antique Radio Collector (``Antique Radio Collector''). Antique Radio Collector seeks reconsideration of a Forfeiture Order issued by the Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau on November 27, 2007, in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for willful and repeated violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted violations involved Antique Radio Collector's marketing of uncertified AM radio transmitters. BACKGROUND On November 15, 2006, the Division sent a letter of inquiry (``LOI'') to Antique Radio Collector in response to a complaint alleging that Antique Radio Collector was marketing in the United States fully assembled uncertified AM transmitters, specifically the SSTRAN model
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1031A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1031A1.pdf
  • 2009 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order (``NAL''), we find Sennheiser Electronic Corporation (``Sennheiser'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The apparent violation involves Sennheiser's marketing of unauthorized radio frequency devices. II. BACKGROUND In July 2008, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') began an investigation into Sennheiser's marketing of wireless microphones. In a letter of inquiry (``LOI'') dated August 15, 2008, the Division instructed Sennheiser to provide specific information regarding the manufacture, marketing,
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1198A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1198A1.pdf
  • 2009 Released: May 29, 2009 By the Regional Director, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Orvac Electronics, Inc. ("Orvac"), in Fullerton, California, for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). On May 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') to Orvac after determining that Orvac marketed non-certified 2.4 GHz wireless video transmitters and wireless cameras (intentional radiators). In this Order, we consider Orvac's argument that the devices at issue were registered with the FCC. II.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1281A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1281A1.pdf
  • Released: June 12, 2009 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Mobilarm, Ltd. (``Mobilarm''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Mobilarm for possible violations of 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (the ``Act''), and Sections 2.803 and 80.203(a) of the Communications Rules (``Rules''), regarding the marketing of an uncertified radio frequency device in the United States. The Bureau and Mobilarm have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1304A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1304A1.pdf
  • Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Honeywell International Inc., acting through its Sensing and Control strategic business unit (``Honeywell Sensing and Control''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau into whether Honeywell Sensing and Control violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.223 of the Commission's rules (``Rules'') regarding the marketing and radio frequency emissions of the Honeywell Sensing and Control TMS-9000, a torque measurement device. The Bureau and Honeywell Sensing and Control have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1358A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1358A1.pdf
  • Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Alco Electronics Ltd. (``Alco''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Alco for possible violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (the ``Act'') 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803(a), 2.948(d), and 15.19(b) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803(a), 2.948(d), and 15.19(b), regarding the marketing and labeling of digital television converter boxes. The Bureau and Alco have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1390A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1390A1.pdf
  • June 25, 2009 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Midland Radio Corporation. (``Midland'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-one thousand dollars ($21,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and Section 2.803(g) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted apparent violations involve Midland's marketing of noncompliant General Mobile Radio Service (``GMRS'') transmitters. II. BACKGROUND Section 95.183(a)(4) of the Rules prohibits GMRS operators from transmitting coded messages and messages with hidden meanings. The Enforcement Bureau's Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') received information indicating that Midland was marketing GMRS transmitters that have a voice scrambling
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1428A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1428A1.pdf
  • the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order (``NAL''), we find Iftron Technologies, Inc. (``Iftron'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of five thousand six hundred dollars ($5,600) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The apparent violation involves Iftron's marketing of an audio/video transmitter that operates on a restricted frequency and therefore is not eligible for a grant of equipment certification. II. BACKGROUND The Enforcement Bureau's Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') received information that Iftron was marketing audio/video transmitters that are capable of operating on a restricted frequency,
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-146A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-146A1.pdf
  • February 2, 2009 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Proxim Wireless Corporation (``Proxim'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of eleven thousand dollars ($11,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted apparent violations involve Proxim's marketing of non-compliant wireless access points. II. BACKGROUND The Commission received a report from the National Telecommunication and Information Administration (``NTIA'') indicating that Proxim's ORiNICO AP-4000 wireless access point (``AP-4000''), an unlicensed National Information Infrastructure (``U-NII'') device operating in the frequency band 5.250-5.350 GHz, is not in compliance with
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-147A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-147A1.pdf
  • February 2, 2009 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Inter Tech FM (``Inter Tech'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted apparent violation involves Inter Tech's marketing of an unauthorized FM broadcast transmitter. In addition, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of eleven thousand dollars ($11,000) against Inter Tech for providing to the Commission, during the course of this investigation, material factual information that is incorrect without a reasonable basis for believing the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1485A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1485A1.pdf
  • dba Vector Manufacturing, Ltd. (``Vector''), a wholly owned subsidiary of Black & Decker (U.S.A.) Inc. (``Black & Decker''), for marketing in the United States an unauthorized radio frequency device, the Vector iMobile VEC 429 FM transmitter (``Vector Transmitter'' or ``device''), in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803(a)(1), 2.926(e), and 15.239(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803(a)(1), 2.926(e), and 15.239(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On March 7, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') received a complaint regarding the manufacture and marketing of the Vector Transmitter, a Part 15 intentional radiator operating
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1513A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1513A1.pdf
  • July 10, 2009 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Inter Tech FM (``Inter Tech'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-two thousand dollars ($22,000) for willful and repeated violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted apparent violations involve Inter Tech's marketing of FM broadcast transmitters and external RF power amplifiers (``amplifiers'') without proper authorization. background In response to complaints alleging that Inter Tech was marketing unauthorized FM broadcast equipment in the United States, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Enforcement Bureau ("Division") began an investigation. As part of
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1535A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1535A1.pdf
  • By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order (``NAL''), we find LawMate Technology Co., Ltd. (``LawMate'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The apparent violation involves LawMate's marketing of unauthorized radio frequency devices. II. BACKGROUND By letter of inquiry (``LOI'') dated September, 19, 2007, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') initiated an investigation into whether LawMate had marketed non-compliant wireless video transmitter devices in the United States. In subsequent LOIs dated August 4, 2008, and
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1626A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1626A1.pdf
  • Re: File No. EB-08-SE-695 Dear Mr. Cleveland: This is an official CITATION, issued to Hobby Lobby International, Inc. (``HLI'') pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing non-compliant radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803 and 15.209, and importing radio frequency devices without filing FCC Form 740 (or the electronic equivalent) with the United States Customs and Border Patrol in violation of Section 1.1203 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1203. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1697A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1697A1.pdf
  • Division St., Suite 155 Spokane, WA 99218 Re: File No. EB-08-SE-602 Dear Mr. O'Harvey: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to The Spy Store, Inc. (``Spy Store'') for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), and importing radio frequency devices without filing FCC Form 740 (or the electronic equivalent) with the United States Customs and Border Patrol in violation of Section 2.1203 of the Rules. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1772A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1772A1.pdf
  • Adelaide Way San Jose, CA 95124-5548 Re: File No. EB-08-SE-692 Dear Mr. Hirsch: This is an official CITATION issued to Future Hobbies pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States that operate on restricted frequencies in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In response to a complaint alleging that Future Hobbies was marketing unauthorized audio/video transmitters that are capable of operating on restricted frequencies in the 900 MHz and 2.4 GHz frequency bands, the Spectrum Enforcement
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1823A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1823A1.pdf
  • Re: File No. EB-09-SE-133 Dear Mr. Olin: This is an official CITATION issued to Costco Warehouse Corporation (``Costco''), pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for marketing non-compliant radio frequency devices, specifically, the Astak CM-918T2 wireless security camera (``Astak CM-918T2), in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803, 15.209 and 15.249(d) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In March 2009, the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that the Astak CM-918T2 is causing harmful interference to Sprint Nextel's licensed operation of its iDEN network in the 800 MHz and 900
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1824A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1824A1.pdf
  • Re: File No. EB-09-SE-134 Dear Mr. Dach: This is an official CITATION issued to Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (``Wal-Mart''), pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for marketing non-compliant radio frequency devices, specifically, the Astak CM-918T2 wireless security camera (``Astak CM-918T2), in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803, 15.209 and 15.249(d) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In March 2009, the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that the Astak CM-918T2 is causing harmful interference to Sprint Nextel's licensed operation of its iDEN network in the 800 MHz and 900
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-182A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-182A1.pdf
  • By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Pro Tech Monitoring, Inc. (``Pro Tech''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation of Pro Tech by the Bureau for possible violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803(a) and 90.203 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') regarding the marketing and selling of a model of radio frequency transmitting equipment, specifically a Global Positioning System (``GPS'') based tracking device. The Bureau and Pro Tech have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1968A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1968A1.pdf
  • citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation. Sincerely, Kathryn Berthot Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division Enforcement Bureau Federal Communications Commission cc: Dean J Polales. Esq. Ungaretti & Harris, LLP 3500 Three First National Plaza Chicago , IL 60602 (312) 977-9206 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5). 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. � 2.815(b). Section 2.803(e)(4) of the Rules defines ``marketing'' as the ``sale or lease, or offering to sale or lease, including advertising for sale or lease, or importation, shipment or distribution for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease.'' 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(e)(4). Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, to Eric
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2103A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2103A1.pdf
  • By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Imation Corp. (``Imation''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Imation for possible violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803(a), 2.948(d), and 15.19(b) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803(a), 2.948(d), and 15.19(b), regarding the marketing and labeling of digital television (``DTV'') converter boxes. The Bureau and Imation have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2216A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2216A1.pdf
  • Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Midland Radio Corporation. (``Midland''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') by the Bureau against Midland for possible violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (the ``Act''), and Section 2.803(g) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') regarding the marketing of General Mobile Radio Service (GMRS) transmitters equipped with voice scrambling technology. The Bureau and Midland have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2303A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2303A1.pdf
  • Released: October 29, 2009 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: introduction By this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Richfield Electronics (China) Ltd. (``Richfield'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of eighteen thousand dollars ($18,000) for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted violations involve Richfield's marketing of equipment that did not comply with the emission limit of Section 15.239(b) of the Rules and the labeling requirements Section 2.925(a)(1) of the Rules. Background In March 2008, the Commission's Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that the Whole House FM Transmitter (``WH Transmitter'') exceeded the emission limit
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2374A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2374A1.pdf
  • November 5, 2009 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Uniden America Corporation (``Uniden'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-three thousand dollars ($23,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and Section 2.803(g) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted apparent violations involve Uniden's marketing of non-compliant General Mobile Radio Service (``GMRS'') transmitters. II. BACKGROUND Section 95.183(a)(4) of the Rules prohibits GMRS operators from transmitting coded messages and messages with hidden meanings. The Enforcement Bureau's Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') received information indicating that Uniden was marketing GMRS transmitters equipped with voice scrambling technology.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2383A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2383A1.pdf
  • November 6, 2009 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find R.F. Technologies, Inc. (``R.F. Technologies'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The apparent violation involves R.F. Technologies' marketing of an unauthorized radio frequency device. BACKGROUND R.F. Technologies sells and services products, such as the RF400BP, that are designed for business drive-thru facilities. The RF400BP, a portable belt-pack transceiver, is connected to a headset and is typically worn by fast food restaurant employees to communicate with drive-thru
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2426A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2426A1.pdf
  • No. EB-09-SE-136 Dear Mr. Hsia: This is an official CITATION, issued to Team Research, Inc. (``Team Research'') pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for marketing a non-compliant radio frequency device, specifically, the Astak CM-918T2 wireless security camera (``Astak CM-918T2''), in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803, 15.209 and 15.249(d) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In March 2009, the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that the Astak CM-918T2 is causing harmful interference to Sprint Nextel's licensed operation of its iDEN network in the 800 MHz and 900
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2447A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2447A1.pdf
  • President & CEO Troxell Communications, Inc. 4830 S. 38th Street Phoenix, Arizona 85040 Re: File No. EB-09-SE-103 Dear Mr. Troxell: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject Troxell Communications, Inc. ("Troxell") to monetary forfeitures. On May 7, 2009, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau (``Division'') received a complaint alleging that Troxell was marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device, namely the QRF600 interactive wireless audience response
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2506A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2506A1.pdf
  • Weston, Florida 33327 Re: File No. EB-08-SE-099 Dear Mr. Roshberg: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Creativewirelesssav.com d/b/a/ Creative Audio, Inc. (``Creative Audio'') for marketing in the United States radiofrequency devices that operate on restricted frequencies, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry of inquiry (``LOI'') dated August 22, 2008, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau (``Division'') initiated an investigation into whether Creative Audio was marketing in the United States
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-253A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-253A1.pdf
  • the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order (``NAL''), we find Power 7 Technology Corporation (``Power 7'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The apparent violations involve Power 7's marketing of unauthorized radio frequency devices. II. BACKGROUND In March 2008, the FCC's Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') received a complaint alleging that the emissions of the Macally FM Cup Automobile Full Channel FM Transmitter and iPOD Charger (``FM Cup Transmitter'') exceed the limit specified in Section 15.239(b) of the Rules
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2545A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2545A1.pdf
  • Adopted: December 7, 2009 Released: December 9, 2009 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000) against XLNT Idea, Inc. (``XLNT Idea'') for willful and repeated violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted violations involve the marketing of unauthorized digital devices in the United States. On November 4, 2008, the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau (``Division'') issued a Notice of Apparent Liability (``NAL'') for Forfeiture to XLNT Idea in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000). XLNT Idea filed a response to the NAL on
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2623A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2623A1.pdf
  • Suffern, NY 10901-3834 Re: File No. EB-08-SE-142 Dear Mr. Lee: This is an official CITATION, issued to SCS Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Spy Camera Specialists, Inc. (``Spy Camera''), pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In March 2008, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Enforcement Bureau (``Division'') received a complaint alleging that Spy Camera was marketing unauthorized wireless video transmitters that operate in the 1.08, 1.12, 1.16 and 1.2
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-27A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-27A1.pdf
  • January 16, 2009 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Silver Spring Networks (``Silver Spring''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau into whether Silver Spring violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.212(a)(vi)(A) of the Commission's rules (``Rules'') regarding the marketing and labeling of a modular utility meter transmitter. The Bureau and Silver Spring have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-407A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-407A1.pdf
  • Drive Ontario, CA 91761 Re: File No. EB-08-SE-531 Dear Mr. Chen: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing unauthorized and non-compliant radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.239(b) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803 and 15.239(b). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry (``LOI'') dated June 18, 2008, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau initiated an investigation into whether Macally USA Mace Group, Inc.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-7A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-7A1.pdf
  • 15, 2009 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Arkion Systems, LLC (``Arkion''). The Consent Decree is for the purpose of terminating the Bureau's investigation into whether Arkion violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803(a), 2.925 and 15.19 of the Commission's rules (``Rules'') regarding the marketing and use of four models of utility meter transmitters. The Bureau and Arkion have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-831A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-831A1.pdf
  • ProLingo pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for marketing in the United States a radio frequency device, specifically, the Listentech LT700 transmitter, in a manner inconsistent with the terms of its authorization and the requirements of Section 15.237 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 15.237 of the Rules. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In response to a complaint alleging that ProLingo was marketing, as a component of its simultaneous language interpretation systems, certain transmitters that operate on frequencies in the 72-76 MHz band which are restricted under Section 15.237
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1088A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1088A1.pdf
  • Head Boulevard Naples, FL 34110 Re: File No. EB-09-SE-124 Dear Mr. Kallstrom: This is an official CITATION, issued to USA Shutter Company, LLC, d/b/a MaestroShield, (``USA Shutter''), pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803 and 15.201 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In 2009, the Commission received a complaint alleging that USA Shutter was marketing unauthorized wireless remote control transmitters used to control window shutters. The complaint was referred to the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1256A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1256A1.pdf
  • July 6, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Wireless Extenders, Inc. (``Wi-Ex'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of four thousand dollars ($4,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted apparent violation involves Wi-Ex's marketing of radio frequency devices that are not labeled in accordance with Section 2.925(a)(1) of the Rules. II. BACKGROUND The Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Wi-Ex was marketing a dual band cellular/PCS signal booster (``booster'') that was labeled with FCC Identification number SO4YX510-PCS-CEL, an FCC ID number
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1257A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1257A1.pdf
  • Released: July 6, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Cellphone-Mate Inc. (``Cellphone-Mate'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of four thousand dollars ($4,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted apparent violation involves Cellphone-Mate's marketing of radio frequency devices that are not labeled in accordance with Section 2.925(a)(1) of the Rules. II. BACKGROUND pectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') began an investigation. The Division issued a letter of inquiry (``LOI'') to Cellphone-Mate on January 29, 2010. Cellphone-Mate responded to the LOI on March 1, 2010.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1321A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1321A1.pdf
  • July 20, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Qomo HiteVision, LLC (``Qomo''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Qomo for possible violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.201(b) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') regarding the marketing of unauthorized radio frequency response systems. The Bureau and Qomo have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1511A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1511A1.pdf
  • Released: August 27, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Kannad SAS (``Kannad''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Kannad for possible violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), regarding Kannad's marketing of 406.0-406.1 MHz emergency locator transmitters (``406 MHz ELTs'') that were not labeled in accordance with Section 87.199(f) the Rules. The Bureau and Kannad have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1897A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1897A1.pdf
  • October 4, 2010 Released: October 4, 2010 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Callaway Golf Company (``Callaway''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau into whether Callaway violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803, 15.19, 15.31(j), and 15.107(a) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''), regarding the marketing of computer peripheral devices and a battery charger. 2. The Bureau and Callaway have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2187A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2187A1.pdf
  • Released: November 18, 2010 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Wolf Seeberg Video for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). Wolf Seeberg Video should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may subject your company to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of equipment, and criminal sanctions. background On April
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2188A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2188A1.pdf
  • Released: November 18, 2010 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Able Cine Tech for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). Able Cine Tech should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may subject your company to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of equipment, and criminal sanctions. background On June
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2189A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2189A1.pdf
  • 2010 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to South Bay Film and Video Services for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). South Bay Film and Video Services should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may subject your company to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of equipment, and criminal sanctions.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2220A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2220A1.pdf
  • Released: November 23, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), to Hobby Lobby International, Inc. (``HLI'') for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''). HLI should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Rules in this regard may subject your company to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of equipment, and criminal sanctions. background The Office of Engineering and
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2240A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2240A1.pdf
  • November 26, 2010 By the District Director, Columbia Office, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), to Jammer World/theJammerStore.com (``Jammer World'') for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''). Jammer World should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Rules in this regard may subject your company to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of equipment, and criminal sanctions. background , and observed an
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2290A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2290A1.pdf
  • Released: December 8, 2010 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and RF Linx Corporation (``RF Linx''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against RF Linx for possible violations of section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and sections 2.803(a), 2.925, and 15.204(d)(1), (2) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''), regarding RF Linx's marketing of external radio frequency power amplifiers. The Bureau and RF Linx have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2295A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2295A1.pdf
  • 6, 2010 Released: December 6, 2010 By the District Director, Columbia Office, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), to Everbuying.com for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''). Everbuying.com should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Rules in this regard may subject your company to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of equipment, and criminal sanctions. background , and observed an advertisement
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-521A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-521A1.pdf
  • 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Enhanced Vision Systems, Inc. (``Enhanced Vision''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Enhanced Vision for possible violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Sections 2.803(a), 15.19, 15.21, and 15.105 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') regarding the marketing of Class B Digital Devices, specifically, vision assistance products for the legally blind. The Bureau and Enhanced Vision have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-616A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-616A1.pdf
  • By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Motorola, Inc. (``Motorola''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Motorola for possible violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803(a), 2.926(e), 15.37(l), and 15.407(h) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803(a), 2.926(e), 15.37(l), and 15.407(h), regarding the marketing and labeling of Unlicensed National Information Infrastructure (U-NII) devices. The Bureau and Motorola have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-618A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-618A1.pdf
  • 15, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Airspan Networks (Israel), Ltd. (``Airspan''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Airspan for possible violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803, 2.925, and 15. 407(h)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') regarding the marketing and selling of unlicensed National Information Infrastructure (``U-NII'') devices. The Bureau and Airspan have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-669A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-669A1.pdf
  • April 20, 2010 Released: April 20, 2010 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Phonejammer.com (``Phonejammer'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty five thousand dollars ($25,000) for willful and repeated violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted apparent violations involve the marketing in the United States of radio frequency devices designed to intentionally interfere with licensed cellular and Personal Communications Services (``PCS''). II. BACKGROUND On May 22, 2008, the Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') issued a Citation to Phonejammer pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Act.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-689A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-689A1.pdf
  • April 23, 2010 Released: April 26, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Axxcelera Broadband Wireless, Inc. (``Axxcelera''). The Consent Decree terminates the Bureau's investigation into Axxcelera's possible violations of Section 302(b) the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 15.407(h)(2) of the Commission's Rules, regarding the marketing of unlicensed National Information Infrastructure (``U-NII'') devices. The Bureau and Axxcelera have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-7A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-7A1.pdf
  • 2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29416 Re: File No. EB-09-SE-087 Dear Mr. Wolf: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to MAL� GeoScience USA, Inc. (``MAL�'') for marketing in the United States an unauthorized radio frequency device in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), and for importing a radio frequency device without filing FCC Form 740 (or the electronic equivalent) with the United States Customs and Border Patrol in violation of Section 2.1203 of the Rules. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In April of 2009,
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-804A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-804A1.pdf
  • 14, 2010 Released: May 14, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Entone, Inc. (``Entone''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau into whether Entone violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (``Act''), and Sections 2.803(a), 2.925, 2.1074, 2.1204, and 15.19 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') regarding the marketing, labeling, and identification of unauthorized radio frequency devices. The Bureau and Entone have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1164A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1164A1.pdf
  • Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), to New Generation Hobbies (``New Generation'') for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices that operate on restricted frequencies in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the rules (``Rules'') of the Federal Communications Commission (``Commission'' or ``FCC''). New Generation should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Rules in this regard may subject your company to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1165A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1165A1.pdf
  • 2011 By the Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), to Sound Around Inc. (``Sound Around'') for marketing in the United States radiofrequency devices that operate on restricted frequencies in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act and sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the rules (``Rules'') of the Federal Communications Commission (``Commission''), and for marketing wireless microphones that are capable of operating in the 700 MHz band (698-806 MHz) in violation of section 74.851(g) of the Rules. Sound Around should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct, including removing from display (including
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1188A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1188A1.pdf
  • Director, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') of the Federal Communications Commission (``FCC'' or ``Commission'') and ReconRobotics, Inc. (``ReconRobotics''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau into whether ReconRobotics violated section 302a(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and section 2.803 of the Commission's rules (``Rules''), regarding the manufacturing, marketing, distributing, and selling of radio frequency transmitters. 2. The Bureau and ReconRobotics have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-125A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-125A1.pdf
  • 2011 Released: January 26, 2011 By the Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), to DeadlyDeal.com (``Deadly Deal'') for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and section 2.803 of the Commission's rules (``Rules''). Deadly Deal should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Rules in this regard may subject your company to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of equipment and criminal sanctions. bACKGROUND By letter of inquiry
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-135A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-135A1.pdf
  • January 26, 2011 By the Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), to Comtrex Communications Ltd. (``Comtrex'') for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and section 2.803 of the Commission's rules (``Rules''). Comtrex should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Rules in this regard may subject your company to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of equipment, and criminal sanctions. II. BACKGROUND On June 9, 2009,
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1468A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1468A1.pdf
  • Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Marshall Amplification PLC (``Marshall'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand two hundred dollars ($7,200) for its apparent willful and repeated violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and sections 2.803(a)(2) and 15.105(b) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''). The noted apparent violations involve Marshall's marketing of a Class B digital audio radio frequency device in the United States without providing mandatory disclosures to consumers in the device's user manual. II. BACKGROUND 2. On July 12, 2010, the Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau issued a letter of inquiry to
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1661A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1661A1.pdf
  • Act''), to each of the companies listed in the caption to this Citation and in Appendix A attached hereto (each, an ``Online Vendor,'' and collectively, the ``Online Vendors'') for marketing in the United States a total of 215 uniquely described models of cell, GPS, and other signal jamming devices in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act and sections 2.803 and 15.201(b) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''). Signal jamming devices pose significant risks to public safety and potentially compromise other radio communications services. Each Online Vendor must take immediate steps to cease marketing signal jamming devices to consumers in the United States and its territories and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. This may include actions such as removing
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1720A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1720A1.pdf
  • operated by the United States Government.'' In addition, section 302(b) of the Communications Act provides that ``[n]o person shall manufacture, import, sell, offer for sale, or ship devices or home electronic equipment and systems, or use devices, which fail to comply with regulations promulgated pursuant to this section.'' The applicable implementing regulations for section 302(b) are set forth in sections 2.803, 15.201 and 15.3(o) of the Rules. Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Rules provides that: no person shall sell or lease, or offer for sale or lease (including advertising for sale or lease), or import, ship, or distribute for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease, any radio frequency device unless ... [i]n the case of a
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1911A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1911A1.pdf
  • 2011 Released: November 17, 2011 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Custom Interface Technologies, a Division of Thornstar Corporation (``CIT''), in Joshua Tree, California, willfully and repeatedly violated section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and sections 2.803(a)(1) and 74.851(f) of the Commission's rules (``Rules'') by manufacturing and marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices. We conclude that CIT is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000). BACKGROUND In May and June, 2010, the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office (``Los Angeles Office'') investigated allegations that uncertified video assist transmitters were being sold and rented
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-246A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-246A1.pdf
  • evidence that the original application for certification was tainted by misrepresentations and/or that unauthorized changes were made to the TxTStopperTM device post-certification. Grant of an application for equipment certification is governed by section 2.915 of the Rules, which requires that the grant serve the public interest and that the device comply with the pertinent technical rules, in this case, sections 2.803(a), 2.931, and 15.201. Section 333 of the Act, moreover, states that ``[n]o person shall willfully or maliciously interfere with or cause interference to any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under this Act or operated by the United States Government.'' In addition, section 302(b) of the Act provides that ``[n]o person shall manufacture, import, sell, offer
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-247A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-247A1.pdf
  • February 9, 2011 By the Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), to Share Enterprises Unlimited, Inc. (``Share'') for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and section 2.803 of the Commission's rules (``Rules''), and for providing incorrect, material factual information to the Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') in violation of section 1.17(a)(2) of the Rules. Share should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-248A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-248A1.pdf
  • February 9, 2011 Released: February 9, 2011 By the Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), to DealExtreme for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''), and for failing to respond to Enforcement Bureau Letters of Inquiry (``LOIs'') directing DealExtreme to provide certain information and documents. DealExtreme should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. In addition, you must to respond to the Enforcement Bureau's June 12, 2009 LOI within thirty
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-249A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-249A1.pdf
  • actions is available at www.fcc.gov/eb/jammerenforcement. What is Prohibited? Federal law prohibits the manufacture, marketing, and operation of jammers in the United States. As to operation, section 333 of the Communications Act prohibits ``willful or malicious'' interference to authorized radio communications, and thus prohibits the operation of jammers. As to manufacture and marketing, section 302(b) of the Communications Act and section 2.803 of the Commission's rules prohibit the manufacture, import, sale, offer for sale, or shipment of devices that do not comply with the FCC's rules. In turn, the FCC prohibits the marketing of radio frequency devices in the United States unless the devices are properly authorized or meet other applicable requirements. Jammers, by definition, can never be authorized because they are
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-408A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-408A1.pdf
  • 2011 Released: March 3, 2011 By the District Director, Los Angeles Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to SecurityMan, Inc. (``SecurityMan'') for marketing non-compliant radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of section 302(b) of the Act, and section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's rules. SecurityMan should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of equipment, and criminal sanctions. background In December 2009, the Enforcement
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-5A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-5A1.pdf
  • 2011 By the District Director, Detroit Office, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), to Doctor Radio's CB Shop (``Doctor Radio'') for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''). Doctor Radio should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Rules in this regard may subject your company to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of equipment, and criminal sanctions. background On October 20, 2010,
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-754A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-754A1.pdf
  • 28, 2011 Released: April 28, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and PreSonus Audio Electronics, Inc. (``PreSonus''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Bureau regarding PreSonus's compliance with section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and sections 2.803, 2.1203, 15.19, and 15.105 of the Commission's rules (``Rules'') pertaining to the marketing of unauthorized Class B digital audio radio frequency devices. The Bureau and PreSonus have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that would resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-812A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-812A1.pdf
  • operated by the United States Government.'' In addition, section 302(b) of the Communications Act provides that ``[n]o person shall manufacture, import, sell, offer for sale, or ship devices or home electronic equipment and systems, or use devices, which fail to comply with regulations promulgated pursuant to this section.'' The applicable implementing regulations for section 302(b) are set forth in sections 2.803, 15.201 and 15.3(o) of the Rules. Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Rules provides that: no person shall sell or lease, or offer for sale or lease (including advertising for sale or lease), or import, ship, or distribute for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease, any radio frequency device unless ... [i]n the case of a
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-885A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-885A1.pdf
  • May 19, 2011 Released: May 20, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Luxul Wireless, Inc. (``Luxul''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Bureau regarding Luxul's compliance with section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and sections 2.803(a), 2.925, and 15.204(d)(1), (2) of the Commission's rules (``Rules'') pertaining to the marketing of external radio frequency power amplifiers. The Bureau and Luxul have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that would resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-924A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-924A1.pdf
  • operated by the United States Government.'' In addition, section 302(b) of the Communications Act provides that ``[n]o person shall manufacture, import, sell, offer for sale, or ship devices or home electronic equipment and systems, or use devices, which fail to comply with regulations promulgated pursuant to this section.'' The applicable implementing regulations for section 302(b) are set forth in sections 2.803, 15.201 and 15.3(o) of the Rules. Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Rules provides that: no person shall sell or lease, or offer for sale or lease (including advertising for sale or lease), or import, ship, or distribute for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease, any radio frequency device unless ... [i]n the case of a
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-976A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-976A1.pdf
  • Released: June 1, 2011 By the Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find SmartLabs, Inc. (``SmartLabs'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of ten thousand dollars ($10,000) for willful and repeated violations of section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''). The apparent violations involve SmartLabs' marketing of an unauthorized radio frequency device. BACKGROUND C Identification number (``FCC ID'') SBP2440, an FCC ID that was not found in the FCC's equipment authorization database. SmartLabs responded to the LOI on June 17, 2010. In its LOI Response, SmartLabs indicated that it began manufacturing and marketing the RemoteLinc
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-984A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-984A1.pdf
  • INTRODUCTION This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), to Gary L. Stanford, d.b.a. Spark Gap CB Shop (``Spark Gap CB'') for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices and external radio frequency power amplifiers in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and sections 2.803(a)(1) and 2.815(b) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''). Spark Gap CB should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Rules in this regard may subject you to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of equipment, and criminal sanctions. background On November
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-98A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-98A1.pdf
  • 2011 By the District Director, Columbia Office, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), to New Century Technology Limited (``New Century'') for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''). New Century should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below, and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Rules in this regard may subject your company to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of equipment, and criminal sanctions. background , and observed an
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-270A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-270A1.pdf
  • 2, 2012 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (Bureau) of the Federal Communications Commission and American Music and Sound (AMS). The Consent Decree resolves and terminates the Bureau's investigation into AMS's compliance with Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (Act), and Sections 2.803, 2.1203, 15.19, 15.21, and 15.105 of the Commission's rules (Rules) pertaining to the marketing of unauthorized Class A digital audio radio frequency devices. The Bureau and AMS have negotiated the Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-360A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-360A1.pdf
  • By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (Bureau) of the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) and ETI Sound Systems, Inc. (ETI). The Consent Decree resolves and terminates the Bureau's investigation into ETI's compliance with Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the Act), and Sections 2.803, 2.1203, 15.19, 15.21, and 15.105 of the Commission's rules (Rules) pertaining to the marketing of digital radio frequency devices, including guitar amplifiers, CD/MP3 players, and active speaker systems. The Bureau and ETI have negotiated the Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. After reviewing the terms of
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-42A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-42A1.pdf
  • 2012 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') of the Federal Communications Commission (``Commission'') and Hawking Technologies, Inc. (``Hawking''). The Consent Decree settles an enforcement proceeding against Hawking regarding Hawking's compliance with section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and sections 2.803(a) and 15.204(d) of the Commission's rules in connection with its marketing of certain external radio frequency power amplifiers. The Bureau and Hawking have negotiated the Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-574A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-574A1.pdf
  • In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (Bureau) of the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) and Richard Mann d/b/a The Antique Radio Collector (Mr. Mann). The Consent Decree settles an enforcement proceeding regarding Mr. Mann's willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (Act), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's rules (Rules) in connection with the marketing in the United States of uncertified AM radio transmitters assembled from kits. The Bureau and Mr. Mann have negotiated the Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-63A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-63A1.pdf
  • South Central Region, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order (NAL), we find US Jetting, Inc. (US Jetting) apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of eight thousand four hundred dollars ($8,400) for its apparent willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (Act), and Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 15.201(b) of the Commission's rules (Rules). The noted apparent violations involve US Jetting's marketing of radio frequency devices in the United States prior to obtaining Commission authorization for such devices. Further, we order US Jetting to submit a statement signed under penalty of perjury by an officer or director of the company stating that it is no longer marketing
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-745A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-745A1.pdf
  • Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: On November 27, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division (Division) of the Enforcement Bureau (Bureau) issued a Forfeiture Order against Richard Mann d/b/a The Antique Radio Collector (Mr. Mann), assessing a forfeiture in the amount of $7,000 for the willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (Act), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's rules (Rules) in connection with the marketing in the United States of uncertified AM radio transmitters assembled from kits. On December 27, 2007, Mr. Mann filed an Appeal of Forfeiture Order in which he sought cancellation or reduction of the forfeiture. On April 30, 2008, the Bureau released the Reconsideration Order, which affirmed the Forfeiture Order and
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310226A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310226A1.pdf
  • Enforcement Bureau has issued 20 enforcement actions against online retailers in 12 states for illegally marketing more than 200 uniquely-described models of cell phone jammers, GPS jammers, Wi-Fi jammers, and similar signal jamming devices. These devices have the capacity to prevent, block, or otherwise interfere with authorized radio communications in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act and sections 2.803 and 15.201(b) of the Commission's rules. The Enforcement Bureau's actions are intended to warn retailers and potential purchasers that marketing, selling, or using signal jamming devices in the U.S. is illegal and that the FCC will vigorously prosecute these violations. Enforcement Bureau Chief Michele Ellison said, ``Our actions should send a strong message to retailers of signal jamming devices that
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-100A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-100A1.pdf
  • 0014638803 FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: May 23, 2007 Released: June 1, 2007 By the Commission: I. INTRODUCTION By this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we find that Behringer USA, Inc. (``Behringer'') marketed 50 models of unauthorized radio frequency equipment, specifically digital audio music devices, in willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). We further find that Behringer's violations warrant, and the record before us supports, the imposition of a forfeiture in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000). II. BACKGROUND Section 302(b) of the Act provides that ``[n]o person shall manufacture, import, sell, offer for sale, or ship devices of home electronic equipment and systems, or use
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-209A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-209A1.pdf
  • Released: December 3, 2007 By the Commission: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Austin Hughes Solutions, Inc. (``Austin Hughes'') apparently liable for a forfeiture for marketing nine models of non-verified Class A digital devices in apparent willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). Based on the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that Austin Hughes is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of sixty-three thousand dollars ($63,000). background Section 302 of the Act authorizes the Commission to make reasonable regulations, consistent with the public interest, governing the interference potential of equipment that emits radio frequency
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-3A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-3A1.pdf
  • radiating equipment, specifically Global Positioning Satellite (``GPS'') signal re-radiator kits, which are not authorized and not eligible for authorization by the Commission because the devices operate in restricted frequency bands. We further find that, in marketing these GPS signal re-radiator kits, San Jose willfully and repeatedly violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). For San Jose's violations, we impose a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000). II. BACKGROUND Section 302(b) of the Act provides that ``[n]o person shall manufacture, import, sell, offer for sale, or ship devices of home electronic equipment and systems, or use devices, which fail to comply with regulations
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-45A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-45A1.pdf
  • 0012065009 Adopted: March 28, 2007 Released: April 2, 2007 By the Commission: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Hawking Technologies, Inc. (``Hawking'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.204(d) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The apparent violations involve marketing external radio frequency power amplifiers in a manner that was inconsistent with the terms of Hawking's equipment authorization and the requirements of Section 15.204(d) of the Rules. background Section 302 of the Act authorizes the Commission to make reasonable regulations, consistent with the public interest, governing the interference
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-49A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-49A1.pdf
  • LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE Adopted: March 30, 2007 Released: March 30, 2007 By the Commission: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Ramko Distributors, Inc. (``Ramko'') apparently liable for marketing 17 models of non-certified radio transceivers, in apparent willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The subject devices are neither Commission authorized, nor eligible for such authorization. Based on the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that Ramko is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). background Section 302 of the Act authorizes the Commission to make reasonable regulations, consistent with
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-107A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-107A1.pdf
  • this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Commission and San Jose Technology, Inc. (formerly known as San Jose Navigation, Inc.) (collectively ``San Jose''). The Consent Decree terminates the Commission's enforcement proceeding regarding San Jose's compliance with the equipment requirements set forth in Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205 of the Commission's Rules. The Commission and San Jose have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve this matter and terminate the enforcement proceeding. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. Based on the available facts related to this matter, we conclude that there are no substantial or material
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-25A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-25A1.pdf
  • ) ) FRN # 0012065009 FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: March 27, 2009 Released: March 31, 2009 By the Commission: In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) to Hawking Technologies, Inc. (``Hawking'') for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.204(d) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The apparent violations involve marketing external radio frequency power amplifiers in a manner that was inconsistent with the terms of Hawking's equipment authorization and the requirements of Section 15.204(d) of the Rules. 2. On April 2, 2007, the Commission issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of $50,000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2090A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2090A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2090A1.txt
  • September 14, 2000 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Memorandum Opinion and Order (``Order''), we deny The Two Way Shop's Petition for Reconsideration of the $7,000 Forfeiture Order that we issued to it on April 7, 2000. The Two Way Shop willfully and repeatedly violated Section 302 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803 and 2.815 of the Commission's Rules by offering linear amplifiers for sale. 2. In a letter dated May 3, 2000, the Two Way Shop responded to the Forfeiture Order. We will treat the May 3, 2000 letter as a Petition for Reconsideration of the Forfeiture Order. 3. The Two Way Shop raises one new issue in its Petition for Reconsideration.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2408A1_Erratum.doc
  • with the instructions and by the deadline set forth in the NAL, NOV or Citation. NOTICES OF APPARENT LIABILITY Communications Act 47 U.S.C. � 301 - Unlicensed Operation Hormigonera Chaparro Inc. Aguada, PR. $5,000 NAL. San Juan, PR Resident Agent Office (9/26/00). 47 C.F.R. Part 2 - Frequency Allocations and Radio Treaty Matters; General Rules and Regulations 47 C.F.R. � 2.803 - Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization Stephen Fowler d/b/a Exports R Us., Pineville LA. $7,000 NAL. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. � 2.815 (External Radio Frequency Power Amplifiers). New Orleans, LA District Office (9/28/00). 47 C.F.R. Part 17 - Construction, Marking and Lighting of Antenna Structures 47 C.F.R. � 17.4 - Antenna Structure Registration Natchez Communications, Inc.,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2635A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2635A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2635A1.txt
  • VA Resident Agent Office (10/19/00). 47 C.F.R. � 17.51 - Time When Lights Should Be Exhibited Netcom Technologies, Inc. San Juan, PR. $13,000 NAL. San Juan, PR Resident Agent Office (10/20/00). NOTICES OF VIOLATION Communications Act 47 U.S.C. � 302a - Devices Which Interfere With Radio Reception Mikes CB Sales and Service, Green Bay, WI. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior To Equipment Authorization). Chicago, IL District Office (10/4/00). 47 C.F.R. Part 1 - Practice and Procedure 47 C.F.R. � 1.89 - Notice of Violation Schindler Elevator Corp., KNGK438, Morristown, NJ. Boston, MA District Office (10/18/00). Route 66 Broadcasting Company, Santa Rosa, New Mexico. Denver, CO District Office (10/26/00). 47 C.F.R. � 1.903 - Authorization Required
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2810A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2810A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2810A1.txt
  • � 302. 47 C.F.R. � 2.907. Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, NAL/No. X3248003 (Enf. Bur., Atlanta Office, released May 9, 2000). FCC Identifier NX3SKY2000. The grant was originally issued on August 18, 1998, and was updated to reflect a modification of the device on July 13, 1999. 47 C.F.R. � 15.239. 47 U.S.C. � 302(b) and 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(a)(1). See 47 C.F.R. � 2.907. Section 312(f)(1) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 312(f)(1), which also applies to Section 503(b) of the Act, provides: ``the term `willful,' when used with reference to the commission or omission of any act, means the conscious and deliberate commission or omission of such act, irrespective of any intent to violate any provision of this
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2915A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2915A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2915A1.txt
  • Louisiana ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File Number EB-00-OR-104 NAL/Acct. No. X3262010 FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: December 28, 2000 Released: December 29, 2000 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) against Stephen Fowler d/b/a Exports R Us, for willfully violating Sections 2.803 and 2.815 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by marketing an unauthorized external frequency power amplifier. On September 28, 2000, the Commission's New Orleans, Louisiana Field Office issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Stephen Fowler d/b/a Exports R Us. Stephen Fowler d/b/a Exports R Us has not filed a response.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-475A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-475A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-475A1.txt
  • Bureau: 1. This order imposes a forfeiture against Leslie D. Brewer, d/b/a/ L.D. Brewer's 2-way Radio (collectively, ``Mr. Brewer''), in the amount of $10,000, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``the Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (``the Rules''), 47 C.F.R. � 1.80, for willful violation of Sections 2.803(a)(1), and 15.201(b) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803(a)(1), and 15.201(b). These violations are based on the marketing of a transmitter not authorized by the Commission. The transmitter at issue was sold to an undercover agent of the Commission's Tampa, Florida Field Office. BACKGROUND 2. In early 1997, an agent from the Tampa Field Office visited L.D. Brewer's 2-Way Radio
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-579A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-579A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-579A1.txt
  • 14, 1999, by Cellular Systems Northwest, Inc. (``Northwest''). Northwest seeks reconsideration of the Forfeiture Order released March 15, 1999, in which the former Compliance and Information Bureau (``Bureau'') found it liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of $7,000 for willful and repeated violations of Section 302 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``the Act'') and Sections 2.803 and 2.815 of the Commission's Rules (``the Rules'') relating to the sale of transmitting equipment. For the reasons discussed below, we deny the petition for reconsideration and affirm the monetary forfeiture of $7,000. BACKGROUND 2. Northwest is a consumer electronics dealer in Enumclaw, Washington. On July 9, 1997, Northwest sold and offered to sell external radio frequency power amplifiers --
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-765A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-765A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-765A1.txt
  • Adopted: April 6, 2000 Released: April 7, 2000 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) against the Two Way Shop (``Two Way'') for willful and repeated violations of Section 302 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803 and 2.815 of the of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). These violations involve Two Way's offer for sale of linear amplifiers capable of operation in the 26.965 to 27.405 MHz frequency band. On July 14, 1999, the Commission's Seattle, Washington, Field Office, issued the referenced Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1019A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1019A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1019A1.txt
  • Operating Requirements). Denver, CO District Office (3/15/01). 47 C.F.R. � 90.403 - General Operating Requirements Atlantic Wireless, Inc, WPMM-224, Rochelle Park, NJ. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. � 90.425 (Station Identification). New York, NY District Office (3/30/01). CITATIONS Communications Act 47 U.S.C. � 302 - Devices Which Interfere With Radio Reception CTI of Miami, Miami, FL. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. � 2.803 (Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization) . Miami, FL Resident Agent Office (3/26/01). CANCELLED NOTICES OF VIOLATION Western Wireless Corporation, Bellevue, WA. Saint Paul, MN Resident Agent Office (1/16/01). Cancelled 1/24/01. ; < � - - � � $ B ; < - - ; < - - � F � � � � ��PNG �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1314A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1314A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1314A1.txt
  • WV. Other violations: 47 C.F.R. �� 95.410 ((CB Rule 10) How Much Power May I Use?) and 95.411 ((CB Rule 11) May I Use Power Amplifiers?). Columbia, MD District Office (4/11/01). Steve Wheeler, JR, Berlin, MD. Columbia, MD District Office (4/26/01). CITATIONS 47 C.F.R. Part 2 - Frequency Allocation and Radio Treaty Matters; General Rules and Regulations 47 C.F.R. � 2.803 - Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization A.R.Cellular Accessories, Inc, Brooklyn NY. Philadelphia, PA District Office (4/9/01). Innovision Optics, Santa Monica, CA. Other violations: 47 C.F.R. �� 2.925 (Identification of Equipment) and 2.926 (FCC Identifier) and 15.201 (Equipment Authorization Requirement). Los Angeles, CA District Office (4/17/01). 47 C.F.R. Part 15 - Radio Frequency Devices 47 C.F.R. �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1489A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1489A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1489A1.txt
  • (b) To determine whether Leslie D. Brewer willfully and/or repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, by operating an unlicensed Studio-to-Transmitter Link in 1999 and/or 2000, and, if so, the effect thereof on his basic qualifications to be and remain a Commission licensee. (c) To determine whether Leslie D. Brewer willfully and/or repeatedly violated Sections 2.803(a)(1) and/or 15.201(b) of the Commission's rules by marketing and/or selling an unauthorized radio frequency device or devices, and, if so, the effect thereof on his basic qualifications to be and remain a Commission licensee. (d) To determine whether, in light of the evidence adduced pursuant to the foregoing issues, Leslie D. Brewer is qualified to be and remain a Commission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1644A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1644A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1644A1.txt
  • C. Colflesh, Willards, MD. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. � 95.411 ((CB Rule 11) May I Use Power Amplifiers?). Columbia, MD District Office (5/9/01). CITATIONS Communications Act 47 U.S.C. � 302 - Devices Which Interfere With Radio Reception First Choice Wireless, LLC, Lake Mary, FL. Tampa, FL District Office (5/8/01). High Tech CB Shop, Jacksonville, FL. Other violations: 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803 (Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization) and 2.815 (External Radio Frequency Power Amplifiers). Tampa, FL District Office (5/9/01). White Diamond Communications, Inc., San Juan, PR. San Juan, PR Resident Agent Office (5/14/01). Cell-Station, Inc., Oldsmar, FL. Tampa, FL District Office (5/22/01). 47 C.F.R. Part 15 - Radio Frequency Devices 47 C.F.R. � 15.204 - External Radio Frequency
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2031A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2031A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2031A1.txt
  • and Associated Control Equipment The Original Company, Inc., WBTO-FM, Petersburg, IN. $5,000 NAL. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. � 17.48 (Notification of Extinguishment or Improper Functioning of Lights). Chicago, IL District Office (7/3/01). NOTICES OF VIOLATION Communications Act 47 U,S.C. � 302 - Devices Which Interfere With Radio Reception Fifties Inc. d.b.a. Fifties Communications, San Juan, PR. Other violation: 47 C.F.R.� 2.803 (Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization). San Juan, PR Resident Agent Office (7/23/01). 47 C.F.R. Part 1 - Practice and Procedure 47 C.F.R. � 1.923 - Content of Applications Electronic Communications of WV Inc., WNQE563, NQE723, WNSS299 WPHM360, WPQA433 and ASR# 103090, Kopperston, WV. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. � 17.4(g) (Posting of Antenna Structure Registration Numbers). Columbia,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2273A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2273A1.txt
  • Use? Angel Guillermety, Levttown, PR. San Juan, PR Resident Agent Office (8/23/01). 47 C.F.R. � 95.413 � (CB Rule 13) What Communcations Are Prohibited? The Truck Wash, West Memphis, AR. New Orleans, LA District Office (8/2/01). CITATIONS Communications Act 47 U.S.C. � 302 � Devices Which Interfere With Radio Reception Custom Electronics, Witt Springs, AR. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. � 2.803 (Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization). New Orleans, LA District Office (8/30/01)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2540A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2540A1.txt
  • Accessories, Brooklyn, NY. New York, NY District Office (9/4/01). K & T Photo Electronics, Flushing, NY. New York, NY District Office (9/4/01). Jade Mountain, Boulder, CO. Denver, CO District Office (9/5/01). Deer 1 Electronics, Tampa, FL. Tampa, FL District Office (9/25/01). 47 C.F.R. Part 2 � Frequency Allocation and Radio Treaty Matters; General Rules and Regulations � 47 C.F.R. � 2.803 � Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization TRUCK-N-TRAVEL, Coburg, Oregon. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. � 15.101(Equipment Authorization of Unintentional Radiators). Portland, OR Resident Agent Office (9/17/01). 47 C.F.R. Part 15 � Radio Frequency Devices � 47 C.F.R. � 15.5 � General Conditions of Operation Impact Video, Las Vegas, Nevada. Seattle, WA District Office (9/28/01). � 47 C.F.R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2818A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2818A1.txt
  • NAL or to file a response to a NOV or Citation must do so in accordance with the instructions and by the deadline set forth in the NAL, NOV or Citation. NOTICES OF APPARENT LIABILITY Communications Act � 47 U.S.C. � 302a � Devices Which Interfere With Radio Reception Electronic Unlimited, Miami, FL. $7,000 NAL Other violation: 47 C.F.R. � 2.803 (Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization). Tampa, FL District Office (10/23/01). Lightning Electronics, Inc., Miami, FL. $7,000 NAL. Other violations: 47 C.F.R. � 2.803 (Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization). Tampa, FL District Office (10/29/01). New Image Electronics, Miami, FL. $7,000 NAL. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. � 2.803 (Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2818A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2818A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2818A2.txt
  • a NAL or to file a response to a NOV or Citation must do so in accordance with the instructions and by the deadline set forth in the NAL, NOV or Citation. NOTICES OF APPARENT LIABILITY Communications Act 47 U.S.C. � 302a - Devices Which Interfere With Radio Reception Electronic Unlimited, Miami, FL. $7,000 NAL Other violation: 47 C.F.R. � 2.803 (Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization). Tampa, FL District Office (10/23/01). Lightning Electronics, Inc., Miami, FL. $7,000 NAL. Other violations: 47 C.F.R. � 2.803 (Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization). Tampa, FL District Office (10/29/01). New Image Electronics, Miami, FL. $7,000 NAL. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. � 2.803 (Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2948A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2948A1.txt
  • � 97.103 � Station Licensee Responsibilities Stanley Clewett KF6IKC, Redding, CA. San Francisco, CA District Office (11/21/01). Terms of Station Authorization � First State Bank, Socorro, NM (WNFT448). Denver, CO District Office (11/7/01). 7 CITATIONS Communications Act � 47 U.S.C. � 302 � Devices Which Interfere With Radio Reception TravelCenters of America, Inc., Troutdale, Oregon. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. � 2.803 (Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization). Portland, OR Resident Agent Office (11/19/01). TravelCenters of America, Inc., Aurora, Oregon. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. � 2.803 (Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization). Portland, OR Resident Agent Office (11/19/01). American PCS, New York, NY. New York, NY District Office (11/20/01). A I Telecom, Inc., Niles, MI. Other
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1127A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1127A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1127A1.txt
  • 10, 2002 Released: May 14, 2002 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Memorandum Opinion and Order (``Order''), we cancel a seven thousand dollar ($7,000) Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') that the Miami Resident Agent Office issued to Lightning Electronics, Inc. (``Lightning''), for apparently violating Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The alleged violations involve Lightning's marketing of non-compliant high-power cordless telephones. The Commission's Miami, Florida, Resident Agent Office issued the NAL to Lightning on October 29, 2001. Lightning did not file a response to the NAL. On February 21, 2002, the Chief, Enforcement Bureau, issued a Forfeiture Order affirming the forfeiture proposed by the NAL.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1141A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1141A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1141A1.txt
  • May 15, 2002 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seventeen thousand dollars ($17,000) to CTI of Miami, Inc. (``CTI''), for willful violation of Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and repeated and willful violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted violations involve CTI's marketing of non-compliant high-power cordless telephones and CTI's operation of a non-compliant high-power cordless telephone without authorization from the Commission. On January 25, 2002, the Commission's Miami, Florida, Resident Agent Office issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture in the amount of $17,000 to CTI for the noted violations.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1367A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1367A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1367A1.txt
  • C.F.R. � 1.903 (Authorization Required). San Diego, CA District Office (5/17/02). Mount Rushmore Broadcasting, Inc., KAWK(FM), Custer, SD. $10,000 NAL. Denver, CO District Office (5/31/02). California Speedway, Fontana, CA. $10,000 NAL. Los Angeles, CA District Office (5/30/02). 47 U.S.C. � 302 - Devices Which Interfere With Radio Reception Lightning Electronics, Inc., Miami, FL. $7,000 NAL. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. � 2.803 (Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization). Tampa, FL District Office (5/21/02). 47 C.F.R. Part 11 - Emergency Alert System Rules 47 C.F.R. � 11.35 - Equipment Operational Readiness Fenix Broadcasting Corp., Miami, FL. $21,000 NAL. Other violations: 47 C.F.R. �� 17.51 (Time When Lights Should Be Exhibited) and 73.49 (AM Transmission System Fencing Requirements). Tampa, FL District
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-197A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-197A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-197A1.txt
  • C.F.R. � 95.410 - (CB Rule 10) How Much Power May I Use? Emerson Owerns, Detroit, MI. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. � 95.411 ((CB Rule 11) May I Use Power Amplifiers?). Detroit, MI District Office (12/14/01). CITATIONS Communications Act 47 U.S.C. � 302 - Devices Which Interfere With Radio Reception TravelCenters of America, Arvin, CA. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. � 2.803 (Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization). Los Angeles, CA District Office (12/3/01). TravelCenters of America, Buttonwillow, CA. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. � 2.803 (Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization). Los Angeles, CA District Office (12/3/01). ABC Phone, Brooklyn, NY. New York, NY District Office (12/5/01). Beeper Street, Chris Bruner, Somerville, NJ. New York, NY
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2474A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2474A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2474A1.txt
  • FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: September 30, 2002 Released: October 2, 2002 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. Introduction 1. In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) against Lightning Electronics, Inc. (``Lightning''), for willful and repeated violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted violations involve Lightning's marketing of unapproved long-range cordless telephones. 2. On May 21, 2002, the District Director of the Enforcement Bureau's (``Bureau'') Tampa, Florida, Office (``Tampa Office'') released a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') against Lightning in the amount of $7,000. Lightning filed a response to the NAL dated June 11,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2561A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2561A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2561A1.txt
  • act on similar allegations made by AirCell against one of the petitioners. See Letter from Bill Gordon, V.P. Federal Regulatory Affairs, AirCell, Inc., filed September 18, 2002. See also response of petitioners, Letter from L. Andrew Tollin, Wilkinson Barker Knauer, LLP, filed September 23, 2002. See 47 U.S.C. � 333; see also 47 U.S.C. �� 301, 302(a), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 2.1203, 22.377, http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/cellular/operations/blockingjamming.htm l. See In the Matter of AirCell, Inc., Petition, Pursuant to Section 7 of the Act, for a Waiver of the Airborne Cellular Rule, or, in the Alternative, for a Declaratory Ruling, Order, 14 FCC Rcd. 806 (WTB 1998), recon. granted in part, denied in part, DA 99-1522 (WTB 1999), app. for rev. Denied 15 FCC Rcd.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2983A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2983A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2983A1.txt
  • 5150, and 7150 two-way radios, which are Latin American model radios that are not authorized for resale or use in the United States, including Puerto Rico and the USVI because they do not comply with FCC regulations. Id. at 4, Ex. 1 and 3. Arcom contends that Hughroy Thomas violated Section 302 of the Communications Act, as amended, and Sections 2.803, 2.901, 2.925, and 15.19 of the Commission's rules. Id. at 1. Arcom includes in its Petition a letter dated May 18, 2001, from the USVI Government's Department of Property and Procurement to the Commission's Enforcement Bureau stating that the Department had become aware that various USVI Government agencies were purchasing two-way radios that did not comply with FCC rules from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-373A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-373A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-373A1.txt
  • Miami, Florida ) FRN 0006-1134-84 FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: February 15, 2002 Released: February 20, 2002 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Electronics Unlimited for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted violations involve Electronic Unlimited's marketing of a non-compliant high-power cordless telephone (``Alcon, AT526''). On October 23, 2001, the Commission's Miami, Florida Resident Agent Office (``Miami Office'') issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Electronics Unlimited for the noted violations. Electronics Unlimited has not
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-383A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-383A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-383A1.txt
  • ) FRN 0006-2915-95 FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: February 19, 2002 Released: February 21, 2002 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Lightning Electronics, Inc. (``Lightning''), for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted violations involve Lightning's marketing of non-compliant high-power cordless telephones. On October 29, 2001, the Commission's Miami, Florida, Resident Agent Office issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture in the amount of $7,000 to Lightning for the noted violations. Lightning has not filed a response. Based on the information before us, we affirm
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-402A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-402A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-402A1.txt
  • Carlisle, PA. $10,000 NAL. Philadelphia, PA District Office (1/10/02). Rev. Dr. Philius Nicholas, Brooklyn, NY. $10,000 NAL. New York, NY District Office (1/10/02). Thomas A. Brothers, Berkley, MI. $11,000 NAL. Detroit, MI District Office (1/14/02). CTI of Miami, Inc., Miami, FL. $ 17,000 NAL. Other violations: 47 U.S.C. � 302a (Devices Which Interfere With Radio Reception) and 47 C.F.R. � 2.803 (Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization). Tampa, FL District Office (1/24/02). 47 C.F.R. Part 73 - Radio Broadcast Services 47 C.F.R. � 73.3538 - Application to Make Changes in an Existing Station ACS Television LLC, Eagle River, AK. $13,000 NAL. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. � 74.780 (Broadcast Regulations Applicable to Translators, Low Power, and Booster Stations). Anchorage,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-453A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-453A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-453A1.txt
  • 0006-3343-12 ) FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: February 26, 2002 Released: March 1, 2002 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000), to New Image Electronics (``NIE''), for willful violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted violation involves NIE's marketing of non-compliant long-range cordless telephones. 2. On October 29, 2001, the District Director of the Commission's Tampa, Florida Field Office issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), on behalf of the Commission's Miami, Florida Resident Agent Office ("Miami Office"), in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-724A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-724A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-724A1.txt
  • Dimensions, Langhorne, PA. Philadelphia, PA District Office (2/1/02). AmeriPage Wireless, Lakewood, CA. Los Angeles, CA District Office (2/4/02). Get Connected, Los Angeles, CA. Los Angeles, CA District Office (2/4/02). National Cellular, Brooklyn NY. New York, NY District Office (2/4/02). Power Cell, La Puente, CA. Los Angeles, CA District Office (2/4/02). Delconn Wireless Products, Anaheim, CA. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. � 2.803 (Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization). Los Angeles, CA District Office (2/5/02). Mr. Mahmoud Salem, Stockton, CA. San Francisco, CA District Office (2/6/02). The Cell Gallery, Tracy, CA. San Francisco, CA District Office (2/6/02). Blue Rock Wireless, Inc., MS. New Orleans, LA District Office (2/7/02). Wireless Dimensions, Inc., McLean, VA. Columbia, MD District Office (2/7/02). Wireless Dimensions,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-929A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-929A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-929A1.txt
  • Agent Office (3/18/02). CITATIONS Communications Act 47 U.S.C. � 302 - Devices Which Interfere With Radio Reception Abie Hamideh d.b.a. Planet Wireless, Garland, TX. Dallas, TX District Office (3/4/02). Salena Kinney, Earl Troutman, and Rigo Ochoa d.b.a. Arken Communications, Plano, TX. Dallas, TX District Office (3/4/02). Mr. Michael B. Faulkner, Express Electronics Inc., Longview, TX. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. � 2.803 (Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization). Dallas, TX District Office (3/5/02). Pilot Travel Center #282, Barstow, CA. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. � 2.803 (Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization). Los Angeles, CA District Office (3/5/02). Pilot Travel Center, North Las Vegas, NV. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. � 2.803 (Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2923A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2923A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2923A1.txt
  • significantly exceed the Part 15 emission limits, they present a serious potential for harmful interference to licensed radio services. The Enforcement Bureau is considering appropriate enforcement action against Vector for importing and marketing radio frequency devices that do not comply with the FCC's technical standards in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 2.803(a) of the Rules. This public notice is intended to warn retailers that continued marketing of the six models of Vector battery chargers referenced above will constitute a violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a) of the Rules and may result in sanctions, including monetary forfeitures. For further information contact Suzanne Tetreault at 202-418-7450 or Kathy Berthot at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3107A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3107A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3107A1.txt
  • 7, 2003 Released: October 10, 2003 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Memorandum Opinion and Order (``Order''), we deny the request filed by Lightning Electronics, Inc. (``Lightning''), for reconsideration of the Forfeiture Order issued to Lightning on October 2, 2002, for willful and repeated violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted violations involve Lightning's marketing of unapproved long-range cordless telephones. On May 21, 2002, the District Director of the Enforcement Bureau's (``Bureau'') Tampa, Florida, Office (``Tampa Office'') released a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') against Lightning in the amount of $7,000. Lightning filed its response to the NAL dated June 11, 2002.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3544A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3544A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3544A1.txt
  • of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order (``NAL''), we find Johannus Orgelbouw b.v. (``Johannus'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for importing and marketing radio frequency devices which do not comply with the Commission's technical standards in repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted violations involve Johannus's importing and marketing digital electronic organs that do not comply with the technical requirements set forth in Part 15 of the Rules. In addition, we order Johannus, pursuant to Section 2.956(a)(1) of the Rules, to submit to the Enforcement Bureau a copy of the verification records for each model of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4118A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4118A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4118A1.txt
  • Released: January 2, 2004 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Datel Design and Development, Inc. (``Datel'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of ten thousand dollars ($10,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted violations involve Datel's importing and marketing of approximately 15,000 thousand units of the Datel Talknet USB Headset, Model Number DUS0049, that do not comply with the radiated emission limits set forth in Part 15 of the Rules. BACKGROUND The Talknet USB Headsets involved in this case were manufactured outside the United States. Datel
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4118A1_Erratum.doc
  • Released: January 2, 2004 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Datel Design and Development, Inc. (``Datel'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of ten thousand dollars ($10,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted violations involve Datel's importing and marketing of approximately 15,000 thousand units of the Datel Talknet USB Headset, Model Number DUS0049, that do not comply with the radiated emission limits set forth in Part 15 of the Rules. BACKGROUND The Talknet USB Headsets involved in this case were manufactured outside the United States. Datel
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-690A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-690A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-690A1.txt
  • of a proceeding, and we will address the merits of the instant Informal Requests given that the allegations therein bear on the basic qualifications of the applicant. See Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration, 17 FCC Rcd 20900, 20902 � 8 (WTB PSPWD 2002), and cases cited therein. 47 U.S.C. � 302. 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 2.901, 2.925, 15.19. See June 2001 Informal Request at 1. The June 2001 Informal Request was incorporated by reference in the October 2001 Informal Request. See October 2001 Informal Request at 1. June 2001 Informal Request at 1. Id. Arcom includes in the pleading a letter dated May 18, 2001, from the USVI Government Department of Property and Procurement to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1013A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1013A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1013A1.txt
  • and distributed in the United States by Vector Products, Inc. d/b/a Vector Manufacturing, Ltd. (``Vector'') were not in compliance with the technical standards of Part 15 of the Commission's Rules. The Public Notice advised retailers that continued marketing of the battery chargers would constitute a violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (``Act'') and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). On October 23, 2003, Vector filed a petition for reconsideration of that Public Notice. On April 2, 2004, Vector filed a motion to withdraw the petition for reconsideration. Vector notes that it has entered into a Consent Decree with the Enforcement Bureau and the Office of Engineering and Technology which terminates the Enforcement Bureau's investigation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1092A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1092A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1092A1.txt
  • ) FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: April 23, 2004 Released: April 27, 2004 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of five thousand, six hundred dollars ($5,600) to Johannus Orgelbouw b.v. (``Johannus''), for repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted violations involve Johannus's importing and marketing digital electronic organs that do not comply with the technical requirements set forth in Part 15 of the Rules. On November 6, 2003, the Enforcement Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Johannus. Johannus filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1377A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1377A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1377A1.txt
  • 2004 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau and Schumacher Electric Corporation (``Schumacher''). The Consent Decree terminates the forfeiture proceeding initiated by the Enforcement Bureau against Schumacher for its apparent failure to comply with the equipment requirements set forth in Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The Enforcement Bureau and Schumacher have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve this matter and terminate the forfeiture proceeding. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. Based on the record before us, we conclude that no substantial or material questions of fact exist with respect
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1704A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1704A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1704A1.txt
  • attorney at the prehearing conference held on April 7, 2004. See 47 C.F.R. � 95.1. 47 C.F.R. � 95.631(a). That provision limits non-voice emissions from GMRS transmitters to selective calling or tone-operated squelch tones to establish or continue voice communications. See also 47 C.F.R. � 95.181(f), (g). 47 C.F.R. � 95.631(f). 47 C.F.R. � 95.603(a). See also 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(a)(1). OET originally granted J Communications' Application for Equipment Authorization (FCC Form 731) for its GMRS radios on May 2, 2001. OET reissued the certification on March 20, 2002, after testing the device in accordance with its post-grant sampling program. Emissions are designated by an alphanumeric code according to their classification and necessary bandwidth. The first symbol designates the type of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1705A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1705A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1705A1.txt
  • give manufacturers and distributors the ability to import and/or distribute devices following equipment authorization, while maintaining the confidentiality of detailed technical information about the product prior to product launch. Electronic submittal of a request for such confidentiality will ensure expedited approval and will make it less burdensome for manufacturers and distributors to comply with the marketing regulations in 47 CFR �2.803 and the importation rules in 47 CFR �2.1204, while ensuring that business sensitive information remains confidential until the actual marketing of newly authorized devices. Such confidentiality will extend for 45 days from the date of the Grant of Equipment Authorization, and, absent any other action, the subject exhibits will be automatically placed on the public database at the end of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2253A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2253A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2253A1.txt
  • devices and amplifiers being improperly marketed and imported into the US pursuant to our Verification procedures, despite associated instructions and marketing materials that clearly indicate that they contemplate a connection to a personal computer via a USB port or other connection. This connection places the device into the category of a Class B personal computer peripheral, and under Sections 15.101, 2.803, and 2.1204 of the Commission's rules (47 C.F.R. �� 15.101, 2.803, 2.1204) the device must either be authorized under the Declaration of Conformity procedures (Sections 2.1071-1077) or certification procedures (Sections 2.1031 et al), All digital devices are subject to the same emissions limits, however, different approval processes have been established based on the complexity of testing required to conform with
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2530A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2530A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2530A1.txt
  • Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find IKUSI-Angel Iglesias, S.A. (``IKUSI'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for importing and marketing in the United States non-compliant equipment in willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 15.231(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). II. BACKGROUND The Office of Engineering and Technology referred to the Enforcement Bureau a complaint alleging that IKUSI's Remote Crane Transmitter (``RCT Model TM60''), a radio frequency device designed for the remote control of cranes and hoists, fails to comply with Section 15.231(a) of the Rules, which requires a manually operated transmitter to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3189A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3189A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3189A1.txt
  • VIA Technologies, Inc. (``VIA'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000) for importing and marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices, specifically, its model EPIA-M and EPIA-CL computer central processing unit (``CPU'') boards, in willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). II. BACKGROUND The FCC's Office of Engineering and Technology referred to the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Enforcement Bureau a complaint alleging that VIA was importing and marketing in the U.S. CPU boards which include a setup option to disable the board's spread spectrum clocking (``SSC'') function. The complainant alleged that VIA was importing the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3553A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3553A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3553A1.txt
  • �� 1.1307, 17.4, and 17.7. Equipment authorization must be obtained for ATC user terminals pursuant to the test-based certification procedure specified in Part 2, Subpart J of the Commission's rules before such devices are marketed in the United States or imported for sale or lease in the United States. 47 C.F.R. � 25.149(c)(1) and (2). Also see 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 2.901 et seq., and 2.1204. Dual-mode MSS/ATC terminals are also subject to blanket licensing for the earth-station component. ATC Report and Order at �248. The other petitioners are Inmarsat Ventures Ltd, the U.S. GPS Industry Council, the Cellular Telecommunications and Internet Association, Cingular Wireless LLC, The Boeing Company, and the Society of Broadcast Engineers, Inc. Coordination of use of upper
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3947A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3947A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3947A1.txt
  • issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000) against VIA Technologies, Inc. (``VIA'') for importing and marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices, specifically, its model EPIA-M and EPIA-CL computer central processing unit (``CPU'') boards, in willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). On October 6, 2004, the Spectrum Enforcement Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of $14,000 to VIA. VIA has not filed a response to the NAL. Based on the information before us, we affirm this forfeiture. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Act,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-976A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-976A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-976A1.txt
  • April 12, 2004 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Schumacher Electric Corporation (``Schumacher'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for marketing unauthorized equipment in willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). background On November 5, 2003, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') received a complaint alleging that Schumacher was marketing a new line of SpeedCharge automobile battery chargers (``SpeedChargers'') at the ongoing Automobile Aftermarket Products Expo (``AAPEX'') in Las Vegas, Nevada. According to the complaint, Schumacher did not label the exhibited SpeedChargers under Section 15.19(a)(3) of the Rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1029A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1029A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1029A1.txt
  • Bentonville, Arkansas 72716-0710 Re: File No. EB-05-SE-050 Dear Ms. Nounou: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter dated February 24, 2005, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau initiated an investigation into whether Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (``Wal-Mart'') is marketing in the United States unauthorized radio
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1030A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1030A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1030A1.txt
  • Winchester, Virginia 22602 Re: File No. EB-05-SE-063 Dear Mr. Ryberg: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. It has come to our attention that GPS Outfitters, Inc. (``GPS Outfitters'') has been marketing the Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna in the United States. Specifically, on March 4, 2005, staff of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1031A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1031A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1031A1.txt
  • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15275 Re: File No. EB-05-SE-062 Dear Mr. Colombo: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. It has come to our attention that Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc. (``Dick's'') has been marketing the GPS Outfitters Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna in the United States. Specifically, on March 4, 2005, staff
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1033A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1033A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1033A1.txt
  • Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406 Re: File No. EB-05-SE-064 Dear Mr. Rubin: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. It has come to our attention that Fogdog, Inc. (``Fogdog'') has been marketing the GPS Outfitters Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna in the United States. Specifically, on February 14, 2005 and March 18,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1034A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1034A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1034A1.txt
  • Canton, Massachusetts 02021 Re: File No. EB-05-SE-065 Dear Mr. Stone: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. It has come to our attention that Tweeter Home Entertainment Group (``Tweeter'') has been marketing the GPS Outfitters Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna in the United States. Specifically, on March 7, 2005 and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1035A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1035A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1035A1.txt
  • Englewood, Colorado 80110 Re: File No. EB-05-SE-078 Dear Mr. Hendrickson: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. It has come to our attention that The Sports Authority, Inc. (``Sports Authority'') has been marketing the GPS Outfitters Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna in the United States. Specifically, on March 15, 2005,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1036A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1036A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1036A1.txt
  • Canada, California 91011 Re: File No. EB-05-SE-080 Dear Mr. Levra: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. It has come to our attention that Sport Chalet, Inc. (``Sport Chalet'') has been marketing the GPS Outfitters Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna in the United States. Specifically, on March 15, 2005, staff
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1037A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1037A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1037A1.txt
  • Isle Beach, NC 28469 Re: File No. EB-05-SE-079 Dear Sir/Madam: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. It has come to our attention that The GPS Store, Inc. (``GPS Store'') has been marketing the GPS Outfitters Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna in the United States. Specifically, on March 15, 2005,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1107A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1107A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1107A1.txt
  • Dallas, Texas 75228 Re: File No. EB-05-SE-007 Dear Mr. Baker: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the Rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter dated March 11, 2005, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau initiated an investigation into whether Dallas Avionics, Inc., (``Dallas'') is domestically marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices, specifically, the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1155A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1155A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1155A1.txt
  • 94545 Re: File No. EB-05-SE-005 Dear Mr. Ho: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for importing and marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter dated March 7, 2005, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau initiated an investigation into whether Gilsson Technologies (``Gilsson'') is marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1388A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1388A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1388A1.txt
  • East Hampstead, NH 03826 Re: File No. EB-05-SE-066 Dear Mr. Clark: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter dated March 15, 2005, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau initiated an investigation into whether Sandown Wireless (``Sandown'') is marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1622A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1622A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1622A1.txt
  • 108 Seattle, WA 98105 Re: File No. EB-05-SE-059 Dear Shaker Hassan: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter dated March 15, 2005, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau initiated an investigation into whether Grand Trades Co. (``Grand Trades'') is marketing in the United States unauthorized
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1666A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1666A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1666A1.txt
  • CA 91411 Re: File No. EB-05-SE-170 Dear Sir or Madam: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The equipment authorization for the LRT-1 learned mode remote control transmitter device (``learned mode transmitter'') manufactured by Tung Shih Technology Co., Ltd. was revoked on April 18, 2005 (copy of revocation order
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1701A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1701A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1701A1.txt
  • Released: June 22, 2005 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Hawking Technologies, Inc. (``Hawking''), apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-two thousand dollars ($22,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.204(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The alleged violations involve marketing external radiofrequency power amplifiers in a manner that was inconsistent with the terms of its equipment authorization and the requirements of Section 15.204(a) of the Rules. background On December 9 and 14, 2004, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') received complaints alleging that Hawking was illegally marketing the Hawking Model
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1776A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1776A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1776A1.txt
  • jammers suggest that the devices may be used on commuter trains, in theaters, hotels, restaurants and other locations the public frequents. The Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and the FCC rules prohibit the manufacture, importation, marketing, sale or operation of these devices within the United States (See Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 USC � 302a(b) and Section 2.803(a) of the FCC's rules, 47 CFR � 2.803(a)). In addition, it is unlawful for any person to willfully or maliciously interfere with the radio communications of any station licensed or authorized under the Act or operated by the U.S. Government (See Section 333 of the Communications Act, 47 USC � 333). Further, Section 301 of the Act, 47 USC �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2036A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2036A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2036A1.txt
  • MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: July 18, 2005 Released: July 20, 2005 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Memorandum Opinion and Order, we admonish TeleRadio AB (``TeleRadio'') for importing and marketing in the United States non-compliant radiofrequency devices in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.231(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). II. BACKGROUND In 2004, the FCC's Office of Engineering and Technology (``OET'') Laboratory requested four TeleRadio remote control transmitters, designed for the remote control of cranes and hoists in industrial use, for compliance testing as part of its post-grant sampling program. On June 21, 2004, the OET Lab tested the transmitters and found
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2069A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2069A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2069A1.txt
  • July 25, 2005 Released: July 27, 2005 By the Regional Director, South Central Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Hightech CB Shop (``Hightech'') for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted violation involves Hightech's offering for sale a non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceiver. II. BACKGROUND On May 9, 2001, the Commission's Tampa Office of the Enforcement Bureau (``Tampa Office'') issued a Citation to Hightech for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 2.815(b) of the Rules by offering for sale
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2236A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2236A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2236A1.txt
  • Angeles, CA 90036 Re: File No. EB-05-SE-229 Dear Mr. Premore: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The equipment authorization for the Remocon LRT-1 learned mode remote control transmitter device (``learned mode transmitter''), also known as the Remocon RMC-600, manufactured by Tung Shih Technology Co., Ltd. was revoked on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2237A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2237A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2237A1.txt
  • Reseda, CA 91335 Re: File No. EB-05-SE-227 Dear Mr. Bitton: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The equipment authorization for the LRT-1 learned mode remote control transmitter device (``learned mode transmitter'') manufactured by Tung Shih Technology Co., Ltd. was revoked on April 18, 2005 (copy of revocation order
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2238A1.txt
  • Reseda, CA 91335 Re: File No. EB-05-SE-228 Dear Mr. Bitton: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The equipment authorization for the LRT-1 learned mode remote control transmitter device (``learned mode transmitter'') manufactured by Tung Shih Technology Co., Ltd. was revoked on April 18, 2005 (copy of revocation order
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2318A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2318A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2318A1.txt
  • Parker Irvine, CA 92618 Re: File No. EB-04-SE-253 Dear Mr. Wei: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing unlabeled radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(a)(1). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter dated December 7, 2004, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau initiated an investigation into whether Blitzz Technology, Inc. (``Blitzz'') is marketing in the United States unauthorized radio
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2352A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2352A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2352A1.txt
  • 11237 Re: File No. EB-05-SE-350 Dear Mr. Yao: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for importing and marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter dated December 2, 2004, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau initiated an investigation into whether Joe's Photo Auction is marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2382A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2382A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2382A1.txt
  • September 1, 2005 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division: I. INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Gibson Tech Ed, Inc. (``Gibson'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000) for apparent willful and repeated violation of Sections 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted apparent violations involve Gibson's marketing of two models of unauthorized FM broadcast transmitters. II. BACKGROUND On June 30, 2004, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') issued Gibson a Citation for marketing unauthorized FM broadcast transmission equipment manufactured by Veronica Ltd. (``Veronica''), in violation Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803 of the Rules, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2394A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2394A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2394A1.txt
  • 02818 Re: File No. EB-05-SE-173 Dear Mr. Jensen: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for: (1) marketing an unauthorized radio frequency (``RF'') device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(a); and (2) importing RF devices without declaring an import condition in violation of Section 2.1203 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1203. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject you to monetary forfeitures. Your response of July 14, 2005, to our letter of inquiry
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2429A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2429A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2429A1.txt
  • 0009360082 NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE Adopted: September 8, 2005 Released: September 12, 2005 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Inteligain Corporation, Inc. (``Inteligain'') has apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by marketing the Inteligain model DBA-819 dual band cellular and Personal Communications Service (``PCS'') amplifier, FCC ID # RCUDBA819-807, in a manner inconsistent with a condition in its equipment certification intended to ensure compliance with RF exposure limits. We conclude that Inteligain is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2928A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2928A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2928A1.txt
  • 0009800848 FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: November 4, 2005 Released: November 8, 2005 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION By this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we find that Bureau D'Electronique Appliquee, Inc. (``B.E.A.'') marketed and imported unauthorized intentional radiating equipment, in willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). For these violations, we impose a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seventeen thousand dollars ($17,000). II. BACKGROUND Section 302(b) of the Act provides that ``[n]o person shall manufacture, import, sell, offer for sale, or ship devices of home electronic equipment and systems, or use devices, which fail to comply with regulations promulgated pursuant to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2994A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2994A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2994A1.txt
  • CA 91406 Re: File No. EB-05-SE-323 Dear Sir or Madam: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. . Section 302(b) of the Act provides that ``[n]o person shall manufacture, import, sell, offer for sale, or ship devices or home electronic equipment and systems, or use devices, which fail to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2998A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2998A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2998A1.txt
  • Alexandria, VA 22312-2707 Re: File No. EB-04-SE-362 Dear Sir or Madame: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing a radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803 and 15.205(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter dated January 11, 2005, (Letter of Inquiry) the Spectrum Enforcement Division (SED) of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau informed Navtech Seminars and GPS Supply (Navtech) that it
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3062A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3062A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3062A1.txt
  • Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau sent Sandown Wireless, a distributor of AS&S's products, an LOI seeking information and documents concerning its marketing of cell phone jammers and multi-purpose jammers to state and local law enforcement agencies in the United States in apparent violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). On behalf of Sandown, AS&S submitted a response to this LOI on March 25, 2005. AS&S included with its response a confidentiality request, in which AS&S asked that ``all documents found within a directory (CD-ROM) and an appendix (printed) named CONFIDENTIAL or marked CONFIDENTIAL be held in confidence and not be made available for public
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3063A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3063A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3063A1.txt
  • 3, 2004, at least a year after the Freetalker was first marketed in the United States. The Bureau subsequently began an investigation to determine whether Shenzhen Ruidian Communication had marketed the Freetalker two-way radio in the United States prior to obtaining an equipment certification in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Rules, and whether Shenzhen Ruidian Communication marketed the Freetalker labeled with Global Link's FCC Identifier. On March 10, 2005, the Bureau sent a letter of inquiry to Shenzhen Ruidian Communication via international certified mail, return receipt requested, facsimile and email. The letter directed Shenzhen Ruidian Communication to submit a response to the letter within 20 days. Shenzhen Ruidian
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3125A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3125A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3125A1.txt
  • this Memorandum Opinion and Order (``Order''), we deny the petition for reconsideration filed by Hightech CB Shop (``Hightech'') of the Forfeiture Order issued July 27, 2005. The Forfeiture Order imposed a monetary forfeiture in the amount of $7,000 to Hightech for the willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted violation involved Hightech's offering for sale a non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceiver. II. BACKGROUND On May 9, 2001, the Commission's Tampa Office of the Enforcement Bureau (``Tampa Office'') issued a Citation to Hightech for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 2.815(b) of the Rules by offering for sale
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-345A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-345A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-345A1.txt
  • (``NAL''), we find Bureau D'Electronique Appliquee, Inc. (``B.E.A.'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000) for importing and marketing in the United States unauthorized intentional radiating devices, specifically, the Wizard and Falcon microwave motion sensors, in willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). II. BACKGROUND On August 3, 2004, the Enforcement Bureau received an informal complaint alleging that B.E.A. is importing and marketing a substantial number of unauthorized motion sensors in the United States, specifically, the Wizard, Falcon and MS-07. In support of the allegation, the complainant explained that none of the subject motion sensors are listed on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-42A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-42A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-42A1.txt
  • this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau and St. Louis Music, Inc. (``SLM''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Enforcement Bureau into whether SLM's manufacture, importation, marketing and sale of certain Class B digital audio devices violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (``Act'') and Sections 2.803(a), 15.19 and 15.105(b) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The Enforcement Bureau and SLM have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve this matter and terminate the investigation. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. Based on the record before us, we conclude that no substantial or material questions of fact exist
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1084A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1084A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1084A1.txt
  • 1001 W. Fayette Street Syracuse, New York 13204-2859 Re: File No. EB-06-SE-071 Dear Mr. Hill: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). As explained below, future violations of the equipment provisions of the Act and Rules may subject Oneida Air Systems, Inc. (``Oneida'') to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry (``LOI'') dated March 6, 2006, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau initiated an investigation into whether Oneida marketed dust collection equipment with unauthorized remote
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-121A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-121A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-121A1.txt
  • spectrum or blanket license for mobile earth stations. Id. at �245. An individual, site-specific license must be obtained for any ATC base station that presents an aviation-hazard issue or for which an Environmental Assessment must be prepared. Id. at �239; also see 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1307, 17.4, and 17.7. 47 C.F.R. � 25.149(c)(1) and (2). Also see 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 2.901 et seq., and 2.1204. ATC Report and Order at � 72. 47 C.F.R. � 25.149(b)(1). 47 C.F.R. � 25.149(b)(2). 47 C.F.R. � 25.149(b)(3). 47 C.F.R. � 25.149(b)(4). See 47 C.F.R. � 25.149(b) and Flexibility for Delivery of Communications by Mobile Satellite Service Providers in the 2 GHz Band, the L-Band, and the 1.6/2.4 GHz Bands; Review of the Spectrum
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-132A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-132A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-132A1.txt
  • FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: January 23, 2006 Released: January 25, 2006 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) against Inteligain Corporation, Inc. (``Inteligain'') for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted violation involves Inteligain marketing the dual band cellular (``DBA-819 model'') and Personal Communications Service (``PCS'') amplifier, FCC ID # RCUDBA819-807, in a manner inconsistent with a condition in its equipment certification intended to ensure compliance with RF exposure limits. On September 12, 2005, the Enforcement Bureau, Spectrum Enforcement Division issued a Notice of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1334A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1334A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1334A1.txt
  • 27, 2006 Released: June 29, 2006 By the Regional Director, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to TravelCenters of America (``TravelCenters'') in Troutdale, Oregon, for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 302(b) of the Commissions Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). On July 27, 2005, the Enforcement Bureau's Portland Resident Agent Office issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') after determining that TravelCenters offered for sale a non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceiver. In this Order, we consider TravelCenters' argument that the type of transceivers it offered for sale are not covered by the Commission's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-136A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-136A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-136A1.txt
  • Released: January 25, 2006 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Ramsey Electronics, Inc. (``Ramsey''), apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803(a) and (g) and 2.815(b) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted apparent violations involve Ramsey's marketing of two models of unauthorized FM broadcast transmitters and two models of external radio frequency (``RF'') power amplifiers (``amplifiers''). background The Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') obtained information indicating that Ramsey was apparently marketing unauthorized FM broadcast transmitters and RF amplifiers in the United States. The
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-136A1_Erratum.doc
  • Released: January 25, 2006 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Ramsey Electronics, Inc. (``Ramsey''), apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803(a) and (g) and 2.815(b) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted apparent violations involve Ramsey's marketing of two models of unauthorized FM broadcast transmitters and two models of external radio frequency (``RF'') power amplifiers (``amplifiers''). background The Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') obtained information indicating that Ramsey was apparently marketing unauthorized FM broadcast transmitters and RF amplifiers in the United States. The
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1413A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1413A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1413A1.txt
  • the Bureau. (f) ``Adopting Order'' means an order of the Bureau adopting the terms and conditions of this Consent Decree. (g) ``Effective Date'' means the date on which the Bureau releases the Adopting Order. (h) ``Investigation'' means the investigation commenced by the Bureau's November 17, 2004 Letter of Inquiry regarding whether AMAC violated Section 302(b) of the Act and/or Sections 2.803 and 2.925 of the Rules. (i) ``Rules'' means the Commission's Rules found in Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations. (j) ``Act'' means the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. ��151 et seq. Terms of Agreement The Parties agree that the provisions of this Consent Decree shall be subject to final approval by the Bureau by incorporation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1436A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1436A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1436A1.txt
  • John Reed Court City of Industry, CA 91745 Re: File No. EB-05-SE-018 Dear Mr. Ho: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices, specifically, external radio frequency power amplifiers, in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections 2.803 and 15.204(d) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On August 2, 2005, staff from the Spectrum Enforcement Division (``SED'') of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau visited the internet web site store for OvisLink products, http://store.ovislink.com (``OvisLink online store''). The OvisLink online store listed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1442A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1442A1.txt
  • Released: July 17, 2006 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find AboCom Systems, Inc. (``AboCom'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The apparent violations involve marketing wireless access points that do not comply with the terms of its equipment authorization and the requirements of Section 15.247(d) of the Rules. background The equipment involved in this proceeding is the Hawking Technology, Inc. (``Hawking'') Model HWRG54 wireless access point (``HWRG54'') and the identical Phoebe Micro, Inc. (``Phoebe'') AR315W
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1607A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1607A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1607A1.txt
  • EB-06-SE-259 Dear Mr. Mazursky: This is an official CITATION, issued to Digital Innovations, L.L.C. (``Digital Innovations'') pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing two non-compliant radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. Following receipt of a complaint alleging that Digital Innovations is marketing in the United States two radio frequency devices, specifically, the Security Dr. PC Defender Screen Lock and the Security Dr. Wireless
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1697A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1697A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1697A1.txt
  • 29, 2006 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Memorandum Opinion and Order, we deny a petition for reconsideration filed by Gibson Tech Ed Inc., d/b/a/ Hobbytron.com (``Gibson''), of a Forfeiture Order imposing a forfeiture of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The violations involved Gibson's marketing of two models (R-FM25B-WT) and (R-FM100B-WT) of unauthorized FM broadcast transmitters. BACKGROUND On June 30, 2004, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") issued Gibson a Citation for marketing unauthorized FM broadcast transmission equipment manufactured by Veronica Ltd. ("Veronica"), in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a) of the Rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1933A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1933A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1933A1.txt
  • Adopted: September 27, 2006 Released: September 29, 2006 By the Regional Director, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Clegg Industries, Inc. (``Clegg'') in Torrance, California, for repeatedly violating Section 302(b) of the Commissions Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). On December 21, 2005, the Enforcement Bureau's Seattle District Office issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') after determining that Clegg had apparently repeatedly imported and marketed non-authorized radio frequency devices. In this Order, we consider Clegg's argument that it was unaware that the device in question was in violation of the Commission's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1936A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1936A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1936A1.txt
  • September 29, 2006 By the Regional Director, South Central Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) to Love's Travel Stops and Country Stores, Inc. (``Loves'') for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted violation involves Love's offering for sale non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceivers. II. BACKGROUND On October 15, 2001, and November 13, 2002, Enforcement Bureau field agents visited two Loves' retail outlets in Weatherford and Anna, Texas. At these locations, the stores displayed and offered for sale various models of non-certified CB transceivers marketed as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2019A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2019A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2019A1.txt
  • of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain wireless cameras, specifically, 10 Watt 1.2 GHz Wireless Camera Video AV Transmitter Receivers (``1.2 GHz wireless cameras''), that are not eligible to receive a grant of equipment certification, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803 and 15.205(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On August 30, 2005, the Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that LightObject d/b/a Actionbuy Trading Co. (``LightObject'') was marketing on eBay
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2229A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2229A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2229A1.txt
  • Released Date: November 2, 2006 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of eleven thousand two hundred dollars ($11,200) to Vitec Group Communications Limited (``Vitec'') for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted violations involve Vitec's marketing of unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. II. BACKGROUND In May 2005, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') received a complaint alleging that Clear-Com Communication Systems was marketing unapproved radiofrequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a) of the Rules.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2286A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2286A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2286A1.txt
  • FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: November 7, 2006 Released: November 9, 2006 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) against AboCom Systems, Inc. (``AboCom'') for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The violations involve marketing wireless access points that do not comply with the terms of its equipment authorization and the requirements of Section 15.247(d) of the Rules. On July 17, 2006, the Spectrum Enforcement Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of $25,000 to AboCom. AboCom has not filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2350A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2350A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2350A1.txt
  • 22, 2006 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Communications Specialists, Inc. (``CSI'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for apparent willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted apparent violations involve CSI's marketing of radio frequency devices in the United States that do not comply with the radiated emission limits set forth in Section 15.209 of the Rules and the periodic operation limits set forth in Section 15.231 of the Rules. II. BACKGROUND CSI manufactures and markets the PT-1 ``Petlocator'' transmitter,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2479A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2479A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2479A1.txt
  • Region, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of twenty-one thousand dollars ($21,000) to Wesley Noe, d.b.a. GI Joe's Radio Electronics and GI Joe's CB Radio (collectively referred to herein as ``GI Joe's'') for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (``Act''), and Sections 2.803(a)(1), 2.815(b), and 2.815(c) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by offering for sale non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceivers and external radio frequency (``RF'') power amplifiers. BACKGROUND On April 19, 2006, the Detroit Office issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture in the amount of $21,000 to GI Joe's. In the NAL, the Detroit Office found that GI Joe's apparently willfully
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2497A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2497A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2497A1.txt
  • the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find American Future Technology Corporation d/b/a iBuypower (``iBuypower'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000) for apparent willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted apparent violations involve iBuypower's marketing of unauthorized computers to the general public. II. BACKGROUND By letter dated November 29, 2005, the Commission's Office of Engineering and Technology (``OET'') notified iBuypower of the apparent improper marketing of its AMD Athlon-64 and Athlon-64 X2 computers. Specifically, OET noted that iBuypower was marketing the computers to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2499A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2499A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2499A1.txt
  • MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: December 12, 2006 Released: December 14, 2006 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Memorandum Opinion and Order, we admonish Multispectral Solutions, Inc. (``MSSI'') for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). II. BACKGROUND MSSI manufactures and markets an ultra-wideband (``UWB'') precision asset localization system that utilizes an UWB receiver and processor hub. The receiver and processor hub are classified as Class A digital devices and are required to be verified under Section 15.101(a) of the Rules. On October 31, 2006, in response to a complaint alleging
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2549A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2549A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2549A1.txt
  • 2006 Released: December 21, 2006 By the Regional Director, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Gambler's CB & Ham Radio Sales & Service (``Gambler'') for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by offering for sale non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceivers. BACKGROUND On April 5, 2004, the FCC Enforcement Bureau's Detroit Field Office (``Detroit Office'') received information that Gambler was marketing illegal, non-FCC certified devices. Agents from the Detroit Office visited Gambler in Pinconning, Michigan on April 9, 2004, and observed that Gambler displayed and offered
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-587A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-587A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-587A1.txt
  • Myers, FL 33917 Re: File No. EB-05-SE-196 Dear Mr. Holbrook: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Section 2.803 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. � 2.803. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. . Furthermore, you indicated that upon receipt of our December 5, 2005 letter, you ceased marketing the device and discontinued offering it for sale on your web site. Section 302(b) of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-591A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-591A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-591A1.txt
  • thousand six hundred dollars ($5,600) for marketing in the United States unauthorized intentional radiating devices, specifically, wireless monitoring devices used primarily by oil and gas companies for the collection of data and monitoring of remote well sites, process facilities and pipelines, in willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). II. BACKGROUND On October 26, 2005, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Enforcement Bureau received an informal complaint alleging that OleumTech was manufacturing and marketing unauthorized radiofrequency devices. The complaint listed the model numbers of several transmitters which were allegedly unauthorized. In support of the allegation, the complainant explained that it ordered one of OleumTech's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-606A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-606A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-606A1.txt
  • ORDER Adopted: March 17, 2006 Released: March 21, 2006 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000) against Gibson Tech Ed, Inc. (``Gibson'') for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted violations involve Gibson marketing of two models (R-FM25B-WT) and (R-FM100B-WT) of unauthorized FM broadcast transmitters. On September 1, 2005, the Enforcement Bureau, Spectrum Enforcement Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of $14,000 to Gibson. Gibson has not filed a response to the NAL. Based on the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-853A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-853A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-853A1.txt
  • April 13, 2006 Released: April 17, 2006 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seventeen thousand six hundred dollars ($17,600) to Hawking Technologies, Inc. (``Hawking'') for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.204(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The violations involve marketing external radiofrequency power amplifiers in a manner that was inconsistent with the terms of its equipment authorization and the prohibition against the marketing of such devices. background On December 9 and 14, 2004, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') received complaints alleging that Hawking was illegally marketing the Hawking Model HSB1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-861A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-861A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-861A1.txt
  • 2006 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Vitec Group Communications Limited (``Vitec'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000) for apparent willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted apparent violations involve Vitec's marketing of unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. II. BACKGROUND In May 2005, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') received a complaint alleging that Clear-Com Communication Systems (``Vitec'') was marketing unapproved radiofrequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-999A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-999A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-999A1.txt
  • ORDER Adopted: May 9, 2006 Released: May 11, 2006 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of five thousand six hundred dollars ($5,600) against OleumTech Corporation (``OleumTech'') for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted violations involve OleumTech's marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices, specifically, wireless monitoring devices used primarily by oil and gas companies for the collection of data and monitoring of remote well sites, process facilities and pipelines. On March 17, 2006, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Enforcement Bureau issued a Notice
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1271A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1271A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1271A1.txt
  • 2007 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Richard Mann d/b/a The Antique Radio Collector apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted apparent violations involve marketing of uncertified AM radio transmitters. background . Mr. Mann has sold a number of completed units to end users since December 2003. discussion Section 302(b) of the Act provides that ``[n]o person shall manufacture, import, sell, offer for sale, or ship devices or home electronic equipment and systems, or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1313A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1313A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1313A1.txt
  • March 16, 2007 By the Regional Director, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000) to Charles E. Vance, III d/b/a CB Candy Electronics (``Vance''), for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Commissions Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 2.815(c) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). On March 22, 2006, the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of $14,000 to Vance for offering for sale non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceivers and external RF power amplifiers in Ontario, California. In this Order, we affirm the findings of the Los
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1673A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1673A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1673A1.txt
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that Audio Direct is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1674A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1674A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1674A1.txt
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that Buy.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'')
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1675A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1675A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1675A1.txt
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that Audio Discounters is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1676A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1676A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1676A1.txt
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that Ambient Weather is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1753A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1753A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1753A1.txt
  • 812 Kings Highway Saugerties, NY 12477 Re: File No. EB-06-SE-365 Dear Mr. Krein: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Section 2.803 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. � 2.803; for importing radio frequency devices that do not meet one or more of the specified import conditions in violation of Section 2.1204(a) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 2.1204(a); and for being unable to document compliance with the selected import conditions in violation of Section 2.1204(b) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1754A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1754A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1754A1.txt
  • or Madam: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States a police radar jamming device manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-C450 device, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that Chumbo.com is marketing the RMR-C450 device. The Division staff observed that Chumbo.com was not marketing the RMR-S201 device at that time. The Division
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1756A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1756A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1756A1.txt
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that CompSource, Inc. is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1757A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1757A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1757A1.txt
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that Cybergiftcenter.com, Inc. is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1758A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1758A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1758A1.txt
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that Dealznet.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'')
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1760A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1760A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1760A1.txt
  • Vitec Group Communications Limited (``Vitec''). Vitec seeks reconsideration of a Forfeiture Order issued by the Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') to Vitec on October 31, 2006, which assessed a forfeiture of eleven thousand two hundred dollars ($11,200) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted violations involve Vitec's marketing of unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. II. BACKGROUND In May 2005, the Bureau received a complaint alleging that Clear-Com Communication Systems was marketing unapproved radiofrequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a) of the Rules. Specifically, the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1763A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1763A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1763A1.txt
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. TheElectronicCompany.com and observed that TheElectronicCompany.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1764A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1764A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1764A1.txt
  • Mr. Berkowitz: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States a police radar jamming device manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-C450 device, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. Focuscamera.com and observed that Focus Camera, Inc. is marketing the RMR-C450 device. The Division staff observed that Focus Camera, Inc. was not marketing the RMR-S201 device
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1766A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1766A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1766A1.txt
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that Fadfusion is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'')
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1767A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1767A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1767A1.txt
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. DSMiller.com and observed that DSMiller.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1784A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1784A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1784A1.txt
  • by AboCom Systems, Inc. (``AboCom''). Abocom seeks reconsideration of a Forfeiture Order issued by the Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau on November 7, 2006, in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000). In the Forfeiture Order, the Division found willful and repeated violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), involving AboCom's marketing of wireless access points that do not comply with the terms of its equipment authorization and the requirements of Section 15.247(d) of the Rules. background In 2005, the Division received a report from Industry Canada indicating that a wireless access point marketed under an equipment certification granted to AboCom, FCC ID MQ4ARM94,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1789A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1789A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1789A1.txt
  • 20, 2007 Released: April 24, 2007 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau and Trimble Navigation, Limited (``TNL''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Enforcement Bureau into whether TNL violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and Section 2.803 of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), regarding the manufacture, importation, marketing and sale of unlicensed wireless devices. The Enforcement Bureau and TNL have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve this matter and terminate the investigation. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. In the absence of new material evidence, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2994A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2994A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2994A1.txt
  • an official CITATION, issued to Mr. Lance McCuistion, d/b as LM Services and Scorpion Jammer Technology (``Scorpion'') pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States, specifically, the Scorpion ``Ultimate'' KA Jammer and Scorpion Jammer devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). In addition, you have failed to respond to directives of the Enforcement Bureau to provide certain information and documents. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On June 14, 2005, December 15, 2006, and January 25, 2007, staff from the Spectrum Enforcement Division observed on your
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-299A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-299A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-299A1.txt
  • Released: January 31, 2007 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted apparent violations involve RMR's marketing of its RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 models of police radar jamming devices (``jammers''). background The Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information, through several informal complaints, alleging that RMR was manufacturing and marketing unauthorized police radar jammers in the United States. The Division's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-304A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-304A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-304A1.txt
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Auto-Radar-Detectors.com, were marketing police radar jamming
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-307A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-307A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-307A1.txt
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Best Radar Detectors, were marketing police
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-308A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-308A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-308A1.txt
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803 and 15.205. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. , and observed that Electronic Retail Solutions, Inc. was marketing the RMR-S201 (also known as the Phazer II) and the RMR-C450 devices. On September 1, 2005, the Division
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-309A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-309A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-309A1.txt
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Global Trade Group, Inc., were marketing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-310A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-310A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-310A1.txt
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Hoeffener International, were marketing police radar
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-311A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-311A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-311A1.txt
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803 and 15.205. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Radar Detectors Direct, were marketing police radar jamming
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-312A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-312A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-312A1.txt
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Radarjammers.com, were marketing police radar jamming
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-313A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-313A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-313A1.txt
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803 and 15.205. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including The Twister Group, Inc., were marketing police radar
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-321A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-321A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-321A1.txt
  • Lane Williamsville, NY 14221 Re: File No. EB-05-SE-174 Dear Mr. Struckmeyer: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Section 2.803 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. � 2.803. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that DreamBox USA was importing and marketing unauthorized direct broadcast satellite receivers, the DreamBox DM500-S (``DM500-S'') and the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3266A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3266A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3266A1.txt
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Overseas Best Buy, Inc. dba 110220volts.com is marketing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3270A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3270A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3270A1.txt
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Unbeatablesale.com, Inc. is marketing the RMR-S201 and the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3392A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3392A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3392A1.txt
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. shopperschoice.com and observed that ShoppersChoice.com, LLC is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3393A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3393A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3393A1.txt
  • Dear Sir/Madam: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-C450 device, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. shopila.com and observed that Shopila Corporation is marketing the RMR-C450 device. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'')
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3483A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3483A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3483A1.txt
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR''), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. and observed that Gain Saver is marketing the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices. On January 31, 2007, the Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3599A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3599A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3599A1.txt
  • FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: August 14, 2007 Released: August 16, 2007 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) against Rocky Mountain Radar (``RMR'') for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted violations involve RMR's marketing of its RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 models of police radar jamming devices. On January 31, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of $25,000 to RMR. RMR has not filed a response to the NAL. Based on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3974A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3974A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3974A1.txt
  • � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain wireless cameras and wireless camera converters, specifically, 10 Watt, 1.2 GHz Cantek Wireless Camera and Camera Converter Transmitter Receivers (``1.2 GHz wireless camera transmitter receivers''), that are not eligible to receive a grant of equipment certification, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communication Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803 and 15.205(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 6, 2007, staff in the Enforcement Bureau's Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') visited the internet store for Surveillance-Video products, www.surveillance-video.com (``Surveillance-Video online store''). The Surveillance-Video online store listed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4354A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4354A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4354A2.txt
  • the Commission's Rules to Redesignate the 27.5 - 29.5 GHz Frequency Band, to Reallocate the 29.5 - 30.0 GHz Frequency Band, and to Establish Rules and Policies for Local Multipoint Distribution Services (LMDS) and for the Fixed Satellite Service (FSS) 01/31/09 3060-0770 Price Cap Performance Review for Local Exchange Carriers - CC Docket No. 94-1 (New Services) 11/30/08 3060-0773 Sec. 2.803 02/28/10 3060-0774 Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service -- CC Docket No. 96-45, and 47 CFR Part 54 12/31/07 3060-0775 Sec. 64.1903 01/31/10 3060-0779 Amendment of Part 90 of the Commission's Rules to Provide for Use of the 220 MHz Band by the Private Land Mobile Radio Service (PLMRS), PR Docket No. 89-552 09/30/10 3060-0782 Petition for Limited Modification of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4374A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4374A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4374A1.txt
  • October 26, 2007 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Microwave Radio Communications LLC (``MRC'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 90.203 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted apparent violations involve the marketing of uncertified 4.9 GHz aeronautical transmitting equipment (``4.9 GHz equipment''). background On January 10, 2007, the Commission's Office of Engineering and Technology (``OET'') sent a letter to MRC in response to allegations that it may be manufacturing and marketing uncertified 4.9 GHz equipment. In its response
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4449A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4449A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4449A1.txt
  • N. Camac Street Philadelphia, PA 19133 Re: File No. EB-06-SE-222 Dear Mr. King: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Section 2.803 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. � 2.803. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry dated March 28, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau (``the Division'') initiated an investigation into whether Basic Home Shopping is marketing in the United
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-452A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-452A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-452A1.txt
  • FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: January 31, 2007 Released: February 2, 2007 By the Regional Director, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000) to Jason Kaltenbach (``Kaltenbach'') d/b/a Metamerchant, for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 302(b) of the Commissions Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted violation includes offering for sale non-certified VHF and UHF transceivers in Laguna Nigel, California. 2. On November 9, 2006, the District Director of the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of $14,000 to Kaltenbach. Despite repeated contacts by the Los Angeles Office,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4570A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4570A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4570A1.txt
  • Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Liam Patrick Ryan d/b/a L. P. Ryan / Low Power Radio (``Low Power Radio'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted apparent violations involve marketing of uncertified AM radio transmitters. background On May 30, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Enforcement Bureau issued a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to Low Power Radio in response to information that Low Power Radio was marketing in the United States fully-assembled AM transmitters; specifically, the SSTRAN model
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4716A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4716A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4716A1.txt
  • November 27, 2007 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Richard Mann d/b/a The Antique Radio Collector (``Antique Radio Collector'') for willful and repeated violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted violations involve Antique Radio Collector's marketing of uncertified AM radio transmitters. background Section 302(b) of the Act provides that ``[n]o person shall manufacture, import, sell, offer for sale, or ship devices or home electronic equipment and systems, or use devices, which fail to comply with regulations promulgated pursuant to this section.'' Section 2.803(a)(1)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4874A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4874A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4874A1.txt
  • No. EB-07-SE-194 Dear Mr. Melo: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), to BRD Security Products, Inc. d/b/a Spybase.com (``BRD'') for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803 and 15.205(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry dated October 9, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau (``the Division'') initiated an investigation into whether BRD is marketing in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4894A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4894A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4894A1.txt
  • means the 4.9 GHz Carry-Coder II COFDM Digital Wireless Camera System. (f) ``Commission'' and ``FCC'' mean the Federal Communications Commission. (g) ``Effective Date'' means the date on which the Bureau releases the Adopting Order. (h) ``Investigation'' means the investigation commenced by the Bureau's May 23, 2007 Letter of Inquiry regarding whether BMS violated Section 302(b) of the Act and/or Section 2.803 of the Rules. (i) ``Parties'' means BMS and the Bureau. (j) ``Rules'' means the Commission's Rules found in Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations. III. BACKGROUND 3. BMS manufactures and distributes the Carry-Coder II (``CCII'') COFDM Digital Wireless Camera System that operates in the 4.9 GHz band. The CCII System provides law enforcement and public safety agencies with
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-808A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-808A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-808A1.txt
  • Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau and Communications Specialists, Inc. (``CSI''). The Consent Decree terminates the forfeiture proceeding initiated by the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Enforcement Bureau against CSI for its possible violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The Enforcement Bureau and CSI have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve this matter and terminate the forfeiture proceeding. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. Based on the record before us, we conclude that no substantial or material questions of fact exist with respect
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-817A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-817A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-817A1.txt
  • distance, speed, or position for purposes other than navigation. The Radiolocation Service is governed by rules contained in Subpart F of Part 90 of the Commission's Rules. Additionally, the Part 90 rules contain General Technical Standards under Subpart I of the Part 90 rules. Further, any transmitter used for the radiolocation service must satisfy the equipment certification provisions of Section 2.803 of the Commission's rules as detailed in Section 90.203(d). We can confirm that Bulletin 37 still applies for radar operations in the 24.05-24.25 GHz band. Given the limited information contained in the filing we are unable to determine if the devices under consideration for development would completely satisfy the technical requirements of Bulletin 37. It is important to note that,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-881A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-881A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-881A1.txt
  • Director, South Central Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Ben Metzger dba 1 Stop Communications / 1 Stop CB Shop in Titusville, Florida for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted violation involves Mr. Metzger's offering for sale non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceivers. II. BACKGROUND On March 21, 2006, the Commission's Tampa Office of the Enforcement Bureau (``Tampa Office'') issued Mr. Metzger / 1 Stop Communications / 1 Stop CB Shop a Citation for marketing at his store in Titusville non-certified CB transceivers, including
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1193A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1193A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1193A1.txt
  • Victor McCormack Phonejammer.com Re: File No. EB-07-SE-031 Dear Mr. McCormack: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), to Phonejammer.com (``Phonejammer'') for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and section 2.803 of the Commission's rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. � 2.803, and for failing to respond to Enforcement Bureau directives to provide certain information and documents. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry (``LOI'') dated November 6, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Commission's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1196A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1196A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1196A1.txt
  • File No. EB-08-SE-202 Dear Mr. Bassler: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), to David Steele Enterprises, Inc. (``David Steele'') for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803 and 15.205(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry of inquiry (``LOI'') dated May 15, 2008, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau (``Division'') initiated an investigation into whether David Steele
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1202A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1202A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1202A1.txt
  • Kittridge Street #12 Reseda, California 91335-6164 Re: File No. EB-08-SE-203 Dear Mr. Henry: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803 and 15.205(a), and for failing to fully respond to Enforcement Bureau directives to provide certain information and documents. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry (``LOI'') dated May 16, 2008, the Spectrum Enforcement
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1299A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1299A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1299A1.txt
  • Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of six hundred ten dollars ($610) to Liam Patrick Ryan d/b/a L. P. Ryan / Low Power Radio (``Low Power Radio'') for the willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted violation involves Low Power Radio's marketing of uncertified AM radio transmitters. BACKGROUND On May 30, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau issued a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to Low Power Radio in response to information alleging that Low Power Radio was marketing in the United States fully-assembled AM transmitters;
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-155A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-155A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-155A1.txt
  • Dear Ms. and Mr. Bollaro: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), to Garden State Investigations and Security (``Garden State'') for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803 and 15.205(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry dated October 2, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau (``Division'') initiated an investigation into whether Garden State is marketing in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-167A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-167A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-167A1.txt
  • Released: January 29, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Ryzex, Inc. (``Ryzex'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of eight thousand dollars ($8,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted apparent violations involve Ryzex's marketing of noncompliant portable data terminals (``PDTs''). II. BACKGROUND The Enforcement Bureau's Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') received a complaint alleging that Ryzex had modified PDTs manufactured by Symbol Technologies, Inc. (``Symbol'') by replacing their two megabytes per second (``mbps'') radio assemblies with 11 mbps radio assemblies without authorization from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1685A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1685A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1685A1.txt
  • RECEIPT REQUESTED Vladimir Reznik, Owner RangeVideo Re: File No. EB-08-SE-182 Dear Mr. Reznik: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. � 2.803 and 15.205(a), and importing radio frequency devices without filing FCC Form 740 (or the electronic equivalent) with the United States Customs and Border Patrol, in violation of Section 1.1203 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1203. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1754A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1754A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1754A1.txt
  • Kersnowski d/b/a www.radioactiveradios.com Salem, Oregon ) ) ) ) ) ) File Number: EB-08-PO-0044 NAL/Acct. No.: 200832920002 FRN: 0017594524 FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: July 28, 2008 Released: July 30, 2008 By the Regional Director, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: , in Salem, Oregon, for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted violations involve Kersnowski's marketing and offering for sale non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceivers. 2. On March 28, 2008, the Resident Agent of the Enforcement Bureau's Portland Resident Agent Office issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of $7,000 to Kersnowski for offering for sale non-certified CB transceivers in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1937A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1937A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1937A1.txt
  • August 25, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Microboards Technology, LLC (``Microboards'') is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The apparent violations involve marketing unauthorized and non-compliant digital devices in the United States. background The Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Microboards was marketing the Orbit 3 Disc Duplicator, and the MicroOrbit Disc Duplicator digital video disc (``DVD'') and/or compact disc (``CD'') duplicators in the United States
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1951A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1951A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1951A1.txt
  • August 25, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Leetek America, Inc. (``Leetek'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000) for willful and repeated violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted apparent violations involve Leetek's marketing of two unauthorized pager transmitter systems. II. BACKGROUND . The pager transmitter systems involved in this matter must be authorized by the Commission via the certification process prior to being marketed in, or imported into, the United States. Further, users of these systems must obtain licenses from the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1952A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1952A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1952A1.txt
  • 25, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Data Capture Solutions, Inc. (``DCS'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of four thousand dollars ($4,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted apparent violations involve DCS's marketing of noncompliant portable data terminals (``PDTs''). II. BACKGROUND The Enforcement Bureau's Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') received a complaint alleging that DCS had modified a PDT manufactured by Symbol Technologies, Inc. (``Symbol'') by replacing the two megabytes per second (``mbps'') radio assembly with an 11 mbps radio assembly without
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2042A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2042A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2042A1.txt
  • 2008 Released: September 8, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find CoachComm, LLC (``CoachComm'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for willful and repeated violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted apparent violations involve the marketing of an unauthorized radio frequency device. background On August 15, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Enforcement Bureau (``Division'') received a complaint regarding CoachComm's manufacture and marketing of a wireless intercom system under the trade name Connex that uses a belt pack and base station configuration. The
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2051A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2051A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2051A1.txt
  • Maurine Lane Grand Junction, CO 81504 Re: File No. EB-08-SE-034 Dear Mr. Marston: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Section 2.803 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. � 2.803. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry (``LOI'') dated June 3, 2008, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau (``the Division'') initiated an investigation into whether MicroVideoX, LLC, (``MicroVideoX'') is marketing in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2052A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2052A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2052A1.txt
  • September 11, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Wavetrend Technologies, Ltd. (``Wavetrend''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Wavetrend for possible violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') regarding the marketing of certain radio frequency identification devices. The Bureau and Wavetrend have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2062A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2062A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2062A1.txt
  • the Commission's Rules to Redesignate the 27.5 - 29.5 GHz Frequency Band, to Reallocate the 29.5 - 30.0 GHz Frequency Band, and to Establish Rules and Policies for Local Multipoint Distribution Services (LMDS) and for the Fixed Satellite Service (FSS) 01/31/09 3060-0770 Price Cap Performance Review for Local Exchange Carriers - CC Docket No. 94-1 (New Services) 11/30/08 3060-0773 Sec. 2.803 02/28/10 3060-0774 Parts 36 and 54, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service 04/30/11 3060-0775 Sec. 64.1903 01/31/10 3060-0779 Amendment of Part 90 of the Commission's Rules to Provide for Use of the 220 MHz Band by the Private Land Mobile Radio Service (PLMRS), PR Docket No. 89-552 09/30/10 3060-0782 Petition for Limited Modification of LATA Boundaries to Provide Expanded Local
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2437A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2437A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2437A1.txt
  • 4, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find XLNT Idea, Inc. (``XLNT Idea'') is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000) for willful and repeated violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The apparent violations involve marketing unauthorized digital devices in the United States. background The Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that XLNT Idea was marketing the Nexis 100AP AutoPrinter, the Nexis 100AP Publisher, and the Xi440 CD/DVD Printer in the United States without the appropriate labels as required in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2673A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2673A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2673A1.txt
  • Released: December 10, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Multi-Tech Systems, Inc. (``Multi-Tech'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of four thousand dollars ($4,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.105(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted apparent violations involve Multi-Tech's marketing of a radio frequency device without including the required consumer disclosure in the user manual. BACKGROUND Multi-Tech is a manufacturer of communications and device networking products that provide voice and data services over internet protocol networks. One of its products, the CallFinder(R) Global System for Mobile
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2734A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2734A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2734A1.txt
  • 23, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Redflex Traffic Systems, Inc. (``Redflex''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Redflex for possible violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803(a), 2.925, 15.19, 15.201 and 90.203 of the Commission's rules (``Rules'') regarding the marketing and use of two models of radar speed meter equipment. The Bureau and Redflex have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-461A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-461A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-461A1.txt
  • Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to David P. Pace Jr. d/b/a/ Pacetronics / Pace Marketing and 4:13 Electronics / Pacetronics ("Pace"), in Nacogdoches, Texas, for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). On May 23, 2007, the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') to Pace after determining that Pace offered for sale a non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceiver. In this Order, we consider Pace's arguments that he did not willfully violate the Act or the Rules; that he was
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-472A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-472A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-472A1.txt
  • February 29, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find DBK Concepts, Inc. (``DBK'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted apparent violations involve DBK's marketing of noncompliant portable data terminals (``PDTs''). II. BACKGROUND The Enforcement Bureau's Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') received a complaint alleging that DBK had modified PDTs manufactured by Symbol Technologies, Inc. (``Symbol'') by replacing their two megabytes per second (``mbps'') radio assemblies with 11 mbps radio assemblies without authorization from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-513A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-513A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-513A1.txt
  • Plaza Orchard Park, NY 14127 Re: File No. EB-06-SE-441 Dear Mr. Andersen: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), to K1CRA Radio Store (``K1CRA'') for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of Section 302(a) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302(a), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(a)(1). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. After receiving a complaint, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau (``Division'') initiated an investigation into whether K1CRA was marketing unauthorized hand held transceivers in the United States. On May
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-528A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-528A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-528A1.txt
  • 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Memorandum Opinion and Order, we admonish Global Microwave Systems, Inc. (``GMS'') for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices, specifically, uncertified 4.9 GHz aeronautical transmitting equipment (``4.9 GHz equipment''), in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 90.203 of the Commission's rules (``rules''). II. BACKGROUND GMS manufactures and markets microwave radio systems and other devices. On January 10, 2007, the Commission's Office of Engineering and Technology (``OET'') sent a letter to GMS in response to allegations that it may be manufacturing and marketing uncertified 4.9 GHz equipment. In its response to OET's letter, GMS acknowledged that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.txt
  • order to minimize the number of cells in which the footnote reference must be added. Accordingly, we amend footnote NG124 to read as follows: ``In the bands 30.85-34, 37-38, 39-40, 42-47.41, 150.995-156.25, 158.715-159.465, 453.0125-453.9875, 458.0125-458.9875, 460.0125-465.6375, and 467.9375-467.9875 MHz, police licensees are authorized to operate low power transmitters on a secondary basis in accordance with the provisions of 47 CFR 2.803 and 90.20(e)(5).'' In the non-Federal Table, we add a reference to footnote NG124 in the band 156.2475-157.0375 MHz. Format of Domestic Footnotes We are revising the format of 27 domestic footnotes in order to provide for consistency. First, we are revising the format of five footnotes so that the same paragraph structure of a rule section is also used in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-597A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-597A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-597A1.txt
  • 21, 2008 By the Regional Director, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to CB Shop & More, LLLP ("CB Shop"), in Loveland, Colorado, for willful and repeated violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). On August 28, 2007, the Enforcement Bureau's Denver Office issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') to CB Shop after determining that CB Shop offered for sale a non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceiver. In this Order, we consider CB Shop's argument that the CB transceiver at issue did not require Commission certification. II.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-74A1.txt
  • South 1675 West Orem, UT 84058 Re: File No. EB-07-SE-250 Dear Mr. Royer: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and section 2.803 of the Commission's rules (``rules''), 47 C.F.R. � 2.803. In addition, you have failed to respond to directives of the Enforcement Bureau to provide certain information and documents. As explained below, future violations of these rules may subject Absolute Toy Marketing, Inc. to monetary forfeitures. After receiving a complaint, the Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau began an
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-968A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-968A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-968A1.txt
  • Mann d/b/a The Antique Radio Collector (``Antique Radio Collector''). Antique Radio Collector seeks reconsideration of a Forfeiture Order issued by the Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau on November 27, 2007, in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for willful and repeated violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted violations involved Antique Radio Collector's marketing of uncertified AM radio transmitters. BACKGROUND On November 15, 2006, the Division sent a letter of inquiry (``LOI'') to Antique Radio Collector in response to a complaint alleging that Antique Radio Collector was marketing in the United States fully assembled uncertified AM transmitters, specifically the SSTRAN model
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1031A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1031A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1031A1.txt
  • 2009 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order (``NAL''), we find Sennheiser Electronic Corporation (``Sennheiser'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The apparent violation involves Sennheiser's marketing of unauthorized radio frequency devices. II. BACKGROUND In July 2008, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') began an investigation into Sennheiser's marketing of wireless microphones. In a letter of inquiry (``LOI'') dated August 15, 2008, the Division instructed Sennheiser to provide specific information regarding the manufacture, marketing,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1198A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1198A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1198A1.txt
  • 2009 Released: May 29, 2009 By the Regional Director, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Orvac Electronics, Inc. ("Orvac"), in Fullerton, California, for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). On May 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') to Orvac after determining that Orvac marketed non-certified 2.4 GHz wireless video transmitters and wireless cameras (intentional radiators). In this Order, we consider Orvac's argument that the devices at issue were registered with the FCC. II.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1281A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1281A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1281A1.txt
  • Released: June 12, 2009 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Mobilarm, Ltd. (``Mobilarm''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Mobilarm for possible violations of 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (the ``Act''), and Sections 2.803 and 80.203(a) of the Communications Rules (``Rules''), regarding the marketing of an uncertified radio frequency device in the United States. The Bureau and Mobilarm have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1304A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1304A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1304A1.txt
  • Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Honeywell International Inc., acting through its Sensing and Control strategic business unit (``Honeywell Sensing and Control''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau into whether Honeywell Sensing and Control violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.223 of the Commission's rules (``Rules'') regarding the marketing and radio frequency emissions of the Honeywell Sensing and Control TMS-9000, a torque measurement device. The Bureau and Honeywell Sensing and Control have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1307A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1307A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1307A1.txt
  • or are under close control of the licensed user. The rules allow marketing and operation of Radio frequency devices under specific conditions prior to approval of the radio frequency device. The rules are needed to allow manufacturers to evaluate, test and demonstrate the device for product suitability. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 154, 302a, 303, and 336. Section Number and Title: 2.803 Marketing of radio frequency devices prior to equipment authorization. SUBPART J-EQUIPMENT AUTHORIZATION PROCEDURES Brief Description: These rules specify conditions associated with grant of equipment authorization under the Commission's rules. Need: The rules provide procedures and conditions under which grants can be dismissed, limited and revoked. The rules also specify measurement procedures to be applied generally for radiofrequency devices. The rules
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1358A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1358A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1358A1.txt
  • Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Alco Electronics Ltd. (``Alco''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Alco for possible violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (the ``Act'') 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803(a), 2.948(d), and 15.19(b) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803(a), 2.948(d), and 15.19(b), regarding the marketing and labeling of digital television converter boxes. The Bureau and Alco have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1390A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1390A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1390A1.txt
  • June 25, 2009 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Midland Radio Corporation. (``Midland'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-one thousand dollars ($21,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and Section 2.803(g) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted apparent violations involve Midland's marketing of noncompliant General Mobile Radio Service (``GMRS'') transmitters. II. BACKGROUND Section 95.183(a)(4) of the Rules prohibits GMRS operators from transmitting coded messages and messages with hidden meanings. The Enforcement Bureau's Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') received information indicating that Midland was marketing GMRS transmitters that have a voice scrambling
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1428A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1428A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1428A1.txt
  • the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order (``NAL''), we find Iftron Technologies, Inc. (``Iftron'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of five thousand six hundred dollars ($5,600) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The apparent violation involves Iftron's marketing of an audio/video transmitter that operates on a restricted frequency and therefore is not eligible for a grant of equipment certification. II. BACKGROUND The Enforcement Bureau's Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') received information that Iftron was marketing audio/video transmitters that are capable of operating on a restricted frequency,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1485A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1485A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1485A1.txt
  • dba Vector Manufacturing, Ltd. (``Vector''), a wholly owned subsidiary of Black & Decker (U.S.A.) Inc. (``Black & Decker''), for marketing in the United States an unauthorized radio frequency device, the Vector iMobile VEC 429 FM transmitter (``Vector Transmitter'' or ``device''), in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803(a)(1), 2.926(e), and 15.239(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803(a)(1), 2.926(e), and 15.239(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On March 7, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') received a complaint regarding the manufacture and marketing of the Vector Transmitter, a Part 15 intentional radiator operating
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1513A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1513A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1513A1.txt
  • July 10, 2009 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Inter Tech FM (``Inter Tech'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-two thousand dollars ($22,000) for willful and repeated violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted apparent violations involve Inter Tech's marketing of FM broadcast transmitters and external RF power amplifiers (``amplifiers'') without proper authorization. background In response to complaints alleging that Inter Tech was marketing unauthorized FM broadcast equipment in the United States, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Enforcement Bureau ("Division") began an investigation. As part of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1535A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1535A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1535A1.txt
  • By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order (``NAL''), we find LawMate Technology Co., Ltd. (``LawMate'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The apparent violation involves LawMate's marketing of unauthorized radio frequency devices. II. BACKGROUND By letter of inquiry (``LOI'') dated September, 19, 2007, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') initiated an investigation into whether LawMate had marketed non-compliant wireless video transmitter devices in the United States. In subsequent LOIs dated August 4, 2008, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1626A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1626A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1626A1.txt
  • Re: File No. EB-08-SE-695 Dear Mr. Cleveland: This is an official CITATION, issued to Hobby Lobby International, Inc. (``HLI'') pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing non-compliant radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803 and 15.209, and importing radio frequency devices without filing FCC Form 740 (or the electronic equivalent) with the United States Customs and Border Patrol in violation of Section 1.1203 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1203. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1697A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1697A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1697A1.txt
  • Division St., Suite 155 Spokane, WA 99218 Re: File No. EB-08-SE-602 Dear Mr. O'Harvey: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to The Spy Store, Inc. (``Spy Store'') for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), and importing radio frequency devices without filing FCC Form 740 (or the electronic equivalent) with the United States Customs and Border Patrol in violation of Section 2.1203 of the Rules. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1772A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1772A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1772A1.txt
  • Adelaide Way San Jose, CA 95124-5548 Re: File No. EB-08-SE-692 Dear Mr. Hirsch: This is an official CITATION issued to Future Hobbies pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States that operate on restricted frequencies in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In response to a complaint alleging that Future Hobbies was marketing unauthorized audio/video transmitters that are capable of operating on restricted frequencies in the 900 MHz and 2.4 GHz frequency bands, the Spectrum Enforcement
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1823A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1823A1.txt
  • Re: File No. EB-09-SE-133 Dear Mr. Olin: This is an official CITATION issued to Costco Warehouse Corporation (``Costco''), pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for marketing non-compliant radio frequency devices, specifically, the Astak CM-918T2 wireless security camera (``Astak CM-918T2), in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803, 15.209 and 15.249(d) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In March 2009, the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that the Astak CM-918T2 is causing harmful interference to Sprint Nextel's licensed operation of its iDEN network in the 800 MHz and 900
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1824A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1824A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1824A1.txt
  • Re: File No. EB-09-SE-134 Dear Mr. Dach: This is an official CITATION issued to Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (``Wal-Mart''), pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for marketing non-compliant radio frequency devices, specifically, the Astak CM-918T2 wireless security camera (``Astak CM-918T2), in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803, 15.209 and 15.249(d) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In March 2009, the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that the Astak CM-918T2 is causing harmful interference to Sprint Nextel's licensed operation of its iDEN network in the 800 MHz and 900
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-182A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-182A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-182A1.txt
  • By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Pro Tech Monitoring, Inc. (``Pro Tech''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation of Pro Tech by the Bureau for possible violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803(a) and 90.203 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') regarding the marketing and selling of a model of radio frequency transmitting equipment, specifically a Global Positioning System (``GPS'') based tracking device. The Bureau and Pro Tech have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1968A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1968A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1968A1.txt
  • citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation. Sincerely, Kathryn Berthot Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division Enforcement Bureau Federal Communications Commission cc: Dean J Polales. Esq. Ungaretti & Harris, LLP 3500 Three First National Plaza Chicago , IL 60602 (312) 977-9206 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5). 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. � 2.815(b). Section 2.803(e)(4) of the Rules defines ``marketing'' as the ``sale or lease, or offering to sale or lease, including advertising for sale or lease, or importation, shipment or distribution for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease.'' 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(e)(4). Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, to Eric
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2103A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2103A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2103A1.txt
  • By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Imation Corp. (``Imation''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Imation for possible violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803(a), 2.948(d), and 15.19(b) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803(a), 2.948(d), and 15.19(b), regarding the marketing and labeling of digital television (``DTV'') converter boxes. The Bureau and Imation have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2145A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2145A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2145A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Era Systems Corporation Request for Waiver of Sections 2.803, 15.201 and 15.253 of the Commission's Rules ) ) ) ) ) ) ET Docket No. 09-55 ORDER Adopted: September 30, 2009 Released: September 30, 2009 By the Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology: Introduction By this action, we grant in part and deny in part a waiver request by Era Systems Corporation (``Era'') to allow the installation of up
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2216A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2216A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2216A1.txt
  • Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Midland Radio Corporation. (``Midland''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') by the Bureau against Midland for possible violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (the ``Act''), and Section 2.803(g) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') regarding the marketing of General Mobile Radio Service (GMRS) transmitters equipped with voice scrambling technology. The Bureau and Midland have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2303A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2303A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2303A1.txt
  • Released: October 29, 2009 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: introduction By this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Richfield Electronics (China) Ltd. (``Richfield'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of eighteen thousand dollars ($18,000) for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted violations involve Richfield's marketing of equipment that did not comply with the emission limit of Section 15.239(b) of the Rules and the labeling requirements Section 2.925(a)(1) of the Rules. Background In March 2008, the Commission's Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that the Whole House FM Transmitter (``WH Transmitter'') exceeded the emission limit
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2374A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2374A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2374A1.txt
  • November 5, 2009 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Uniden America Corporation (``Uniden'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-three thousand dollars ($23,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and Section 2.803(g) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted apparent violations involve Uniden's marketing of non-compliant General Mobile Radio Service (``GMRS'') transmitters. II. BACKGROUND Section 95.183(a)(4) of the Rules prohibits GMRS operators from transmitting coded messages and messages with hidden meanings. The Enforcement Bureau's Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') received information indicating that Uniden was marketing GMRS transmitters equipped with voice scrambling technology.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2383A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2383A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2383A1.txt
  • November 6, 2009 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find R.F. Technologies, Inc. (``R.F. Technologies'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The apparent violation involves R.F. Technologies' marketing of an unauthorized radio frequency device. BACKGROUND R.F. Technologies sells and services products, such as the RF400BP, that are designed for business drive-thru facilities. The RF400BP, a portable belt-pack transceiver, is connected to a headset and is typically worn by fast food restaurant employees to communicate with drive-thru
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2426A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2426A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2426A1.txt
  • No. EB-09-SE-136 Dear Mr. Hsia: This is an official CITATION, issued to Team Research, Inc. (``Team Research'') pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for marketing a non-compliant radio frequency device, specifically, the Astak CM-918T2 wireless security camera (``Astak CM-918T2''), in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803, 15.209 and 15.249(d) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In March 2009, the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that the Astak CM-918T2 is causing harmful interference to Sprint Nextel's licensed operation of its iDEN network in the 800 MHz and 900
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2447A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2447A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2447A1.txt
  • President & CEO Troxell Communications, Inc. 4830 S. 38th Street Phoenix, Arizona 85040 Re: File No. EB-09-SE-103 Dear Mr. Troxell: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject Troxell Communications, Inc. ("Troxell") to monetary forfeitures. On May 7, 2009, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau (``Division'') received a complaint alleging that Troxell was marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device, namely the QRF600 interactive wireless audience response
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2506A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2506A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2506A1.txt
  • Weston, Florida 33327 Re: File No. EB-08-SE-099 Dear Mr. Roshberg: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Creativewirelesssav.com d/b/a/ Creative Audio, Inc. (``Creative Audio'') for marketing in the United States radiofrequency devices that operate on restricted frequencies, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry of inquiry (``LOI'') dated August 22, 2008, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau (``Division'') initiated an investigation into whether Creative Audio was marketing in the United States
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-253A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-253A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-253A1.txt
  • the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order (``NAL''), we find Power 7 Technology Corporation (``Power 7'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The apparent violations involve Power 7's marketing of unauthorized radio frequency devices. II. BACKGROUND In March 2008, the FCC's Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') received a complaint alleging that the emissions of the Macally FM Cup Automobile Full Channel FM Transmitter and iPOD Charger (``FM Cup Transmitter'') exceed the limit specified in Section 15.239(b) of the Rules
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2545A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2545A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2545A1.txt
  • Adopted: December 7, 2009 Released: December 9, 2009 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000) against XLNT Idea, Inc. (``XLNT Idea'') for willful and repeated violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted violations involve the marketing of unauthorized digital devices in the United States. On November 4, 2008, the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau (``Division'') issued a Notice of Apparent Liability (``NAL'') for Forfeiture to XLNT Idea in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000). XLNT Idea filed a response to the NAL on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2623A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2623A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2623A1.txt
  • Suffern, NY 10901-3834 Re: File No. EB-08-SE-142 Dear Mr. Lee: This is an official CITATION, issued to SCS Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Spy Camera Specialists, Inc. (``Spy Camera''), pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In March 2008, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Enforcement Bureau (``Division'') received a complaint alleging that Spy Camera was marketing unauthorized wireless video transmitters that operate in the 1.08, 1.12, 1.16 and 1.2
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-27A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-27A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-27A1.txt
  • January 16, 2009 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Silver Spring Networks (``Silver Spring''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau into whether Silver Spring violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.212(a)(vi)(A) of the Commission's rules (``Rules'') regarding the marketing and labeling of a modular utility meter transmitter. The Bureau and Silver Spring have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-354A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-354A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-354A1.txt
  • both the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (``Communications Act'') as well as the Commission's rules. Specifically, Section 333 of the Communications Act prohibits willful or malicious interference with ``any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under the Act or operated by the United States Government.'' In addition, Section 302 of the Communications Act, and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's rules prohibit the manufacture, importation, marketing, sale or operation of devices deliberately designed to jam or disrupt wireless communications. As noted above, our denial of the request is consistent with past actions by the Commission's Wireless Telecommunications Bureau; Office of Engineering and Technology; and Enforcement Bureau addressing the permissibility of the sale or use of cell phone
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-407A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-407A1.txt
  • Drive Ontario, CA 91761 Re: File No. EB-08-SE-531 Dear Mr. Chen: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing unauthorized and non-compliant radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.239(b) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803 and 15.239(b). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry (``LOI'') dated June 18, 2008, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau initiated an investigation into whether Macally USA Mace Group, Inc.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-437A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-437A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-437A1.txt
  • TAW Global, LLC 8135 Cox's Drive, Suite 211 Portage, MI 49002 Re: File No. EB-08-SE-533 Dear Mr. Webb: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for marketing a non-compliant and unlabeled radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803(a), 2.925(a) and 15.239(b) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject TAW Global, LLC (``TAW'') to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry (``LOI'') dated September 29, 2008, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau initiated an investigation into whether TAW has been marketing an unauthorized and non-compliant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-545A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-545A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-545A1.txt
  • EB-07-SE-380 Dear Mr. Jordan: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), to A Click Away Remotes LLC (``A Click Away'') for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Section 2.803 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. � 2.803. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau (``Division'') initiated an investigation into whether A Click Away was marketing unauthorized learned mode remote control devices in the United States. On September
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-547A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-547A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-547A1.txt
  • Air Lane Drive Nashville, TN 37210 Re: File No. EB-06-SE-355 Dear Mr. Pack: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5), for marketing non-compliant radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.239(b) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803(a) and 15.239(b). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry (``LOI'') dated February 9, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau initiated an investigation into whether Griffin has been marketing a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-622A1.DOC http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-622A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-622A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-622A1.txt
  • prohibition in Section 333 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), against willful or malicious interference with ``any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under th[e] Act or operated by the United States Government.'' In addition, the Bureau found that the proposed jamming would violate Section 302 of the Communications Act and Section 2.803(a) of our rules which prohibit the manufacture, importation, marketing, sale, or operation of devices deliberately designed to jam or disrupt wireless communications. The Bureau also noted that its denial of DCDOC's request was consistent with past actions by the Bureau, the Office of Engineering and Technology, and the Enforcement Bureau. CellAntenna argues that the Bureau's reasoning in the DCDOC Request
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-7A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-7A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-7A1.txt
  • 15, 2009 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Arkion Systems, LLC (``Arkion''). The Consent Decree is for the purpose of terminating the Bureau's investigation into whether Arkion violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803(a), 2.925 and 15.19 of the Commission's rules (``Rules'') regarding the marketing and use of four models of utility meter transmitters. The Bureau and Arkion have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-831A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-831A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-831A1.txt
  • ProLingo pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for marketing in the United States a radio frequency device, specifically, the Listentech LT700 transmitter, in a manner inconsistent with the terms of its authorization and the requirements of Section 15.237 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 15.237 of the Rules. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In response to a complaint alleging that ProLingo was marketing, as a component of its simultaneous language interpretation systems, certain transmitters that operate on frequencies in the 72-76 MHz band which are restricted under Section 15.237
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-842A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-842A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-842A1.txt
  • requests that it be permitted to mount up to ten fixed 76-77 GHz radars on terminal building rooftops at Atlanta Airport. It states these radars would have a range of approximately 400 meters and would monitor the position of aircraft and vehicles on the ground to provide complete tracking information for airport management purposes. Era also requests waivers of Sections 2.803 and 15.201 to permit the marketing of radar equipment for use in the United States without first obtaining FCC certification. Era contends that the current limitation of 76-77 GHz operations to vehicle-mounted radars was adopted out of concern that other uses of the band could result in interference to vehicle-mounted radars. It states that the Commission expected that there would
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1088A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1088A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1088A1.txt
  • Head Boulevard Naples, FL 34110 Re: File No. EB-09-SE-124 Dear Mr. Kallstrom: This is an official CITATION, issued to USA Shutter Company, LLC, d/b/a MaestroShield, (``USA Shutter''), pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803 and 15.201 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In 2009, the Commission received a complaint alleging that USA Shutter was marketing unauthorized wireless remote control transmitters used to control window shutters. The complaint was referred to the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1256A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1256A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1256A1.txt
  • July 6, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Wireless Extenders, Inc. (``Wi-Ex'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of four thousand dollars ($4,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted apparent violation involves Wi-Ex's marketing of radio frequency devices that are not labeled in accordance with Section 2.925(a)(1) of the Rules. II. BACKGROUND The Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Wi-Ex was marketing a dual band cellular/PCS signal booster (``booster'') that was labeled with FCC Identification number SO4YX510-PCS-CEL, an FCC ID number
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1257A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1257A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1257A1.txt
  • Released: July 6, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Cellphone-Mate Inc. (``Cellphone-Mate'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of four thousand dollars ($4,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted apparent violation involves Cellphone-Mate's marketing of radio frequency devices that are not labeled in accordance with Section 2.925(a)(1) of the Rules. II. BACKGROUND pectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') began an investigation. The Division issued a letter of inquiry (``LOI'') to Cellphone-Mate on January 29, 2010. Cellphone-Mate responded to the LOI on March 1, 2010.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1321A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1321A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1321A1.txt
  • July 20, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Qomo HiteVision, LLC (``Qomo''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Qomo for possible violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.201(b) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') regarding the marketing of unauthorized radio frequency response systems. The Bureau and Qomo have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1511A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1511A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1511A1.txt
  • Released: August 27, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Kannad SAS (``Kannad''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Kannad for possible violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), regarding Kannad's marketing of 406.0-406.1 MHz emergency locator transmitters (``406 MHz ELTs'') that were not labeled in accordance with Section 87.199(f) the Rules. The Bureau and Kannad have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1741A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1741A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1741A1.txt
  • ET Docket No. 96-256 04/30/13 3060-0760 Access Charge Reform, CC Docket No. 96-262 09/30/11 3060-0761 Sec. 79.1 07/31/12 3060-0763 FCC Report 43-06 04/30/12 3060-0767 Secs. 1.2110, 1.2111, and 1.2112, Auction Forms and License Transfer Disclosure Requirements 04/30/11 3060-0768 28 GHz Band 12/31/11 3060-0770 Secs. 1.774, 61.49, 61.55, 61.58, 69.4, 69.707, 69.713, and 69.729, FCC 99-206 (New Services) 11/30/11 3060-0773 Sec. 2.803 12/31/12 3060-0774 Parts 36 and 54, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service 04/30/11 3060-0775 Sec. 64.1903 04/30/13 3060-0779 Secs. 90.20(a)(1)(iii), 90.769, 90.767, 09.763(b)(l)(i)(a), 90.763(b)(l)(i)(B), 90.771(b), and 90.743 11/30/13 3060-0782 Petition for Limited Modification of LATA Boundaries to Provide Expanded Local Calling Service (ELCS) at Various Locations 11/30/12 3060-0783 Sec. 90.176 03/31/12 3060-0787 Implementation of Subscriber Carrier Selection Changes Provisions of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1897A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1897A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1897A1.txt
  • October 4, 2010 Released: October 4, 2010 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Callaway Golf Company (``Callaway''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau into whether Callaway violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803, 15.19, 15.31(j), and 15.107(a) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''), regarding the marketing of computer peripheral devices and a battery charger. 2. The Bureau and Callaway have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2187A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2187A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2187A1.txt
  • Released: November 18, 2010 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Wolf Seeberg Video for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). Wolf Seeberg Video should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may subject your company to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of equipment, and criminal sanctions. background On April
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2188A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2188A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2188A1.txt
  • Released: November 18, 2010 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Able Cine Tech for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). Able Cine Tech should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may subject your company to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of equipment, and criminal sanctions. background On June
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2189A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2189A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2189A1.txt
  • 2010 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to South Bay Film and Video Services for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). South Bay Film and Video Services should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may subject your company to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of equipment, and criminal sanctions.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2220A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2220A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2220A1.txt
  • Released: November 23, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), to Hobby Lobby International, Inc. (``HLI'') for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''). HLI should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Rules in this regard may subject your company to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of equipment, and criminal sanctions. background The Office of Engineering and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2240A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2240A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2240A1.txt
  • November 26, 2010 By the District Director, Columbia Office, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), to Jammer World/theJammerStore.com (``Jammer World'') for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''). Jammer World should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Rules in this regard may subject your company to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of equipment, and criminal sanctions. background , and observed an
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2290A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2290A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2290A1.txt
  • Released: December 8, 2010 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and RF Linx Corporation (``RF Linx''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against RF Linx for possible violations of section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and sections 2.803(a), 2.925, and 15.204(d)(1), (2) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''), regarding RF Linx's marketing of external radio frequency power amplifiers. The Bureau and RF Linx have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2295A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2295A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2295A1.txt
  • 6, 2010 Released: December 6, 2010 By the District Director, Columbia Office, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), to Everbuying.com for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''). Everbuying.com should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Rules in this regard may subject your company to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of equipment, and criminal sanctions. background , and observed an advertisement
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-521A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-521A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-521A1.txt
  • 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Enhanced Vision Systems, Inc. (``Enhanced Vision''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Enhanced Vision for possible violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Sections 2.803(a), 15.19, 15.21, and 15.105 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') regarding the marketing of Class B Digital Devices, specifically, vision assistance products for the legally blind. The Bureau and Enhanced Vision have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-616A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-616A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-616A1.txt
  • By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Motorola, Inc. (``Motorola''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Motorola for possible violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b), and Sections 2.803(a), 2.926(e), 15.37(l), and 15.407(h) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803(a), 2.926(e), 15.37(l), and 15.407(h), regarding the marketing and labeling of Unlicensed National Information Infrastructure (U-NII) devices. The Bureau and Motorola have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-618A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-618A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-618A1.txt
  • 15, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Airspan Networks (Israel), Ltd. (``Airspan''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Airspan for possible violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803, 2.925, and 15. 407(h)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') regarding the marketing and selling of unlicensed National Information Infrastructure (``U-NII'') devices. The Bureau and Airspan have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-669A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-669A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-669A1.txt
  • April 20, 2010 Released: April 20, 2010 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Phonejammer.com (``Phonejammer'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty five thousand dollars ($25,000) for willful and repeated violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted apparent violations involve the marketing in the United States of radio frequency devices designed to intentionally interfere with licensed cellular and Personal Communications Services (``PCS''). II. BACKGROUND On May 22, 2008, the Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') issued a Citation to Phonejammer pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Act.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-689A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-689A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-689A1.txt
  • April 23, 2010 Released: April 26, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Axxcelera Broadband Wireless, Inc. (``Axxcelera''). The Consent Decree terminates the Bureau's investigation into Axxcelera's possible violations of Section 302(b) the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 15.407(h)(2) of the Commission's Rules, regarding the marketing of unlicensed National Information Infrastructure (``U-NII'') devices. The Bureau and Axxcelera have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-7A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-7A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-7A1.txt
  • 2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29416 Re: File No. EB-09-SE-087 Dear Mr. Wolf: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to MAL� GeoScience USA, Inc. (``MAL�'') for marketing in the United States an unauthorized radio frequency device in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), and for importing a radio frequency device without filing FCC Form 740 (or the electronic equivalent) with the United States Customs and Border Patrol in violation of Section 2.1203 of the Rules. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In April of 2009,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-804A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-804A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-804A1.txt
  • 14, 2010 Released: May 14, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Entone, Inc. (``Entone''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau into whether Entone violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (``Act''), and Sections 2.803(a), 2.925, 2.1074, 2.1204, and 15.19 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') regarding the marketing, labeling, and identification of unauthorized radio frequency devices. The Bureau and Entone have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1164A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1164A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1164A1.txt
  • Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), to New Generation Hobbies (``New Generation'') for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices that operate on restricted frequencies in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the rules (``Rules'') of the Federal Communications Commission (``Commission'' or ``FCC''). New Generation should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Rules in this regard may subject your company to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1165A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1165A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1165A1.txt
  • 2011 By the Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), to Sound Around Inc. (``Sound Around'') for marketing in the United States radiofrequency devices that operate on restricted frequencies in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act and sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the rules (``Rules'') of the Federal Communications Commission (``Commission''), and for marketing wireless microphones that are capable of operating in the 700 MHz band (698-806 MHz) in violation of section 74.851(g) of the Rules. Sound Around should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct, including removing from display (including
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1188A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1188A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1188A1.txt
  • Director, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') of the Federal Communications Commission (``FCC'' or ``Commission'') and ReconRobotics, Inc. (``ReconRobotics''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau into whether ReconRobotics violated section 302a(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and section 2.803 of the Commission's rules (``Rules''), regarding the manufacturing, marketing, distributing, and selling of radio frequency transmitters. 2. The Bureau and ReconRobotics have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-125A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-125A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-125A1.txt
  • 2011 Released: January 26, 2011 By the Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), to DeadlyDeal.com (``Deadly Deal'') for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and section 2.803 of the Commission's rules (``Rules''). Deadly Deal should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Rules in this regard may subject your company to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of equipment and criminal sanctions. bACKGROUND By letter of inquiry
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-135A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-135A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-135A1.txt
  • January 26, 2011 By the Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), to Comtrex Communications Ltd. (``Comtrex'') for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and section 2.803 of the Commission's rules (``Rules''). Comtrex should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Rules in this regard may subject your company to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of equipment, and criminal sanctions. II. BACKGROUND On June 9, 2009,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1468A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1468A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1468A1.txt
  • Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Marshall Amplification PLC (``Marshall'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand two hundred dollars ($7,200) for its apparent willful and repeated violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and sections 2.803(a)(2) and 15.105(b) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''). The noted apparent violations involve Marshall's marketing of a Class B digital audio radio frequency device in the United States without providing mandatory disclosures to consumers in the device's user manual. II. BACKGROUND 2. On July 12, 2010, the Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau issued a letter of inquiry to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1661A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1661A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1661A1.txt
  • Act''), to each of the companies listed in the caption to this Citation and in Appendix A attached hereto (each, an ``Online Vendor,'' and collectively, the ``Online Vendors'') for marketing in the United States a total of 215 uniquely described models of cell, GPS, and other signal jamming devices in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act and sections 2.803 and 15.201(b) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''). Signal jamming devices pose significant risks to public safety and potentially compromise other radio communications services. Each Online Vendor must take immediate steps to cease marketing signal jamming devices to consumers in the United States and its territories and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. This may include actions such as removing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1720A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1720A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1720A1.txt
  • operated by the United States Government.'' In addition, section 302(b) of the Communications Act provides that ``[n]o person shall manufacture, import, sell, offer for sale, or ship devices or home electronic equipment and systems, or use devices, which fail to comply with regulations promulgated pursuant to this section.'' The applicable implementing regulations for section 302(b) are set forth in sections 2.803, 15.201 and 15.3(o) of the Rules. Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Rules provides that: no person shall sell or lease, or offer for sale or lease (including advertising for sale or lease), or import, ship, or distribute for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease, any radio frequency device unless ... [i]n the case of a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1911A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1911A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1911A1.txt
  • 2011 Released: November 17, 2011 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Custom Interface Technologies, a Division of Thornstar Corporation (``CIT''), in Joshua Tree, California, willfully and repeatedly violated section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and sections 2.803(a)(1) and 74.851(f) of the Commission's rules (``Rules'') by manufacturing and marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices. We conclude that CIT is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000). BACKGROUND In May and June, 2010, the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office (``Los Angeles Office'') investigated allegations that uncertified video assist transmitters were being sold and rented
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-246A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-246A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-246A1.txt
  • evidence that the original application for certification was tainted by misrepresentations and/or that unauthorized changes were made to the TxTStopperTM device post-certification. Grant of an application for equipment certification is governed by section 2.915 of the Rules, which requires that the grant serve the public interest and that the device comply with the pertinent technical rules, in this case, sections 2.803(a), 2.931, and 15.201. Section 333 of the Act, moreover, states that ``[n]o person shall willfully or maliciously interfere with or cause interference to any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under this Act or operated by the United States Government.'' In addition, section 302(b) of the Act provides that ``[n]o person shall manufacture, import, sell, offer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-247A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-247A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-247A1.txt
  • February 9, 2011 By the Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), to Share Enterprises Unlimited, Inc. (``Share'') for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and section 2.803 of the Commission's rules (``Rules''), and for providing incorrect, material factual information to the Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') in violation of section 1.17(a)(2) of the Rules. Share should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-248A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-248A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-248A1.txt
  • February 9, 2011 Released: February 9, 2011 By the Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), to DealExtreme for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''), and for failing to respond to Enforcement Bureau Letters of Inquiry (``LOIs'') directing DealExtreme to provide certain information and documents. DealExtreme should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. In addition, you must to respond to the Enforcement Bureau's June 12, 2009 LOI within thirty
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-249A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-249A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-249A1.txt
  • actions is available at www.fcc.gov/eb/jammerenforcement. What is Prohibited? Federal law prohibits the manufacture, marketing, and operation of jammers in the United States. As to operation, section 333 of the Communications Act prohibits ``willful or malicious'' interference to authorized radio communications, and thus prohibits the operation of jammers. As to manufacture and marketing, section 302(b) of the Communications Act and section 2.803 of the Commission's rules prohibit the manufacture, import, sale, offer for sale, or shipment of devices that do not comply with the FCC's rules. In turn, the FCC prohibits the marketing of radio frequency devices in the United States unless the devices are properly authorized or meet other applicable requirements. Jammers, by definition, can never be authorized because they are
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-408A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-408A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-408A1.txt
  • 2011 Released: March 3, 2011 By the District Director, Los Angeles Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to SecurityMan, Inc. (``SecurityMan'') for marketing non-compliant radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of section 302(b) of the Act, and section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's rules. SecurityMan should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of equipment, and criminal sanctions. background In December 2009, the Enforcement
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-5A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-5A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-5A1.txt
  • 2011 By the District Director, Detroit Office, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), to Doctor Radio's CB Shop (``Doctor Radio'') for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''). Doctor Radio should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Rules in this regard may subject your company to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of equipment, and criminal sanctions. background On October 20, 2010,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-754A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-754A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-754A1.txt
  • 28, 2011 Released: April 28, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and PreSonus Audio Electronics, Inc. (``PreSonus''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Bureau regarding PreSonus's compliance with section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and sections 2.803, 2.1203, 15.19, and 15.105 of the Commission's rules (``Rules'') pertaining to the marketing of unauthorized Class B digital audio radio frequency devices. The Bureau and PreSonus have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that would resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-812A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-812A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-812A1.txt
  • operated by the United States Government.'' In addition, section 302(b) of the Communications Act provides that ``[n]o person shall manufacture, import, sell, offer for sale, or ship devices or home electronic equipment and systems, or use devices, which fail to comply with regulations promulgated pursuant to this section.'' The applicable implementing regulations for section 302(b) are set forth in sections 2.803, 15.201 and 15.3(o) of the Rules. Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Rules provides that: no person shall sell or lease, or offer for sale or lease (including advertising for sale or lease), or import, ship, or distribute for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease, any radio frequency device unless ... [i]n the case of a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-885A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-885A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-885A1.txt
  • May 19, 2011 Released: May 20, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Luxul Wireless, Inc. (``Luxul''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Bureau regarding Luxul's compliance with section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and sections 2.803(a), 2.925, and 15.204(d)(1), (2) of the Commission's rules (``Rules'') pertaining to the marketing of external radio frequency power amplifiers. The Bureau and Luxul have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that would resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-924A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-924A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-924A1.txt
  • operated by the United States Government.'' In addition, section 302(b) of the Communications Act provides that ``[n]o person shall manufacture, import, sell, offer for sale, or ship devices or home electronic equipment and systems, or use devices, which fail to comply with regulations promulgated pursuant to this section.'' The applicable implementing regulations for section 302(b) are set forth in sections 2.803, 15.201 and 15.3(o) of the Rules. Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Rules provides that: no person shall sell or lease, or offer for sale or lease (including advertising for sale or lease), or import, ship, or distribute for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease, any radio frequency device unless ... [i]n the case of a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-976A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-976A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-976A1.txt
  • Released: June 1, 2011 By the Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find SmartLabs, Inc. (``SmartLabs'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of ten thousand dollars ($10,000) for willful and repeated violations of section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''). The apparent violations involve SmartLabs' marketing of an unauthorized radio frequency device. BACKGROUND C Identification number (``FCC ID'') SBP2440, an FCC ID that was not found in the FCC's equipment authorization database. SmartLabs responded to the LOI on June 17, 2010. In its LOI Response, SmartLabs indicated that it began manufacturing and marketing the RemoteLinc
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-984A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-984A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-984A1.txt
  • INTRODUCTION This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), to Gary L. Stanford, d.b.a. Spark Gap CB Shop (``Spark Gap CB'') for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices and external radio frequency power amplifiers in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and sections 2.803(a)(1) and 2.815(b) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''). Spark Gap CB should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Rules in this regard may subject you to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of equipment, and criminal sanctions. background On November
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-98A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-98A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-98A1.txt
  • 2011 By the District Director, Columbia Office, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), to New Century Technology Limited (``New Century'') for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''). New Century should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below, and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Rules in this regard may subject your company to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of equipment, and criminal sanctions. background , and observed an
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-270A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-270A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-270A1.txt
  • 2, 2012 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (Bureau) of the Federal Communications Commission and American Music and Sound (AMS). The Consent Decree resolves and terminates the Bureau's investigation into AMS's compliance with Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (Act), and Sections 2.803, 2.1203, 15.19, 15.21, and 15.105 of the Commission's rules (Rules) pertaining to the marketing of unauthorized Class A digital audio radio frequency devices. The Bureau and AMS have negotiated the Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-360A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-360A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-360A1.txt
  • By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (Bureau) of the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) and ETI Sound Systems, Inc. (ETI). The Consent Decree resolves and terminates the Bureau's investigation into ETI's compliance with Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the Act), and Sections 2.803, 2.1203, 15.19, 15.21, and 15.105 of the Commission's rules (Rules) pertaining to the marketing of digital radio frequency devices, including guitar amplifiers, CD/MP3 players, and active speaker systems. The Bureau and ETI have negotiated the Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. After reviewing the terms of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-42A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-42A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-42A1.txt
  • 2012 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') of the Federal Communications Commission (``Commission'') and Hawking Technologies, Inc. (``Hawking''). The Consent Decree settles an enforcement proceeding against Hawking regarding Hawking's compliance with section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), and sections 2.803(a) and 15.204(d) of the Commission's rules in connection with its marketing of certain external radio frequency power amplifiers. The Bureau and Hawking have negotiated the Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-574A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-574A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-574A1.txt
  • In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (Bureau) of the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) and Richard Mann d/b/a The Antique Radio Collector (Mr. Mann). The Consent Decree settles an enforcement proceeding regarding Mr. Mann's willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (Act), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's rules (Rules) in connection with the marketing in the United States of uncertified AM radio transmitters assembled from kits. The Bureau and Mr. Mann have negotiated the Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-63A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-63A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-63A1.txt
  • South Central Region, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order (NAL), we find US Jetting, Inc. (US Jetting) apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of eight thousand four hundred dollars ($8,400) for its apparent willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (Act), and Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 15.201(b) of the Commission's rules (Rules). The noted apparent violations involve US Jetting's marketing of radio frequency devices in the United States prior to obtaining Commission authorization for such devices. Further, we order US Jetting to submit a statement signed under penalty of perjury by an officer or director of the company stating that it is no longer marketing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-745A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-745A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-745A1.txt
  • Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: On November 27, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division (Division) of the Enforcement Bureau (Bureau) issued a Forfeiture Order against Richard Mann d/b/a The Antique Radio Collector (Mr. Mann), assessing a forfeiture in the amount of $7,000 for the willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (Act), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's rules (Rules) in connection with the marketing in the United States of uncertified AM radio transmitters assembled from kits. On December 27, 2007, Mr. Mann filed an Appeal of Forfeiture Order in which he sought cancellation or reduction of the forfeiture. On April 30, 2008, the Bureau released the Reconsideration Order, which affirmed the Forfeiture Order and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-222556A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-222556A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-222556A1.txt
  • May 15, 2002 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seventeen thousand dollars ($17,000) to CTI of Miami, Inc. (``CTI''), for willful violation of Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and repeated and willful violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted violations involve CTI's marketing of non-compliant high-power cordless telephones and CTI's operation of a non-compliant high-power cordless telephone without authorization from the Commission. On January 25, 2002, the Commission's Miami, Florida, Resident Agent Office issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture in the amount of $17,000 to CTI for the noted violations.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238039A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238039A1.pdf
  • ) NAL/Acct. No. 200232700005 ) ) FRN Number: 0006-2332-82 ) NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE Released: January 25, 2002 By the Enforcement Bureau, Miami Office: INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, we find that CTI of Miami, Inc. (``CTI'') apparently violated Sections 301 and 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules, by operating an unauthorized high-power cordless telephone without FCC authorization and by marketing an unauthorized high-power cordless telephone (``Senao, SN258-Plus''). We conclude that CTI is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seventeen thousand dollars ($17,000). II BACKGROUND On February 26, 2001 the FCC, Miami Office received a complaint from the Federal Aviation Administration
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238043A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238043A1.pdf
  • Lightning Electronics, Inc. ) Miami, Florida ) NAL/Acct. No. 200232700009 ) FRN 0006-2915-95 NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE Released: May 21, 2002 By the Enforcement Bureau, Tampa Office: INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, we find that Lightning Electronics, Inc. (``Lightning'') apparently violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules, by marketing a non-compliant high-power cordless telephone (``Prolink model BAO-6110CID''). We conclude that Lightning is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000). II BACKGROUND On July 27, 2001, agents from the FCC Enforcement Bureau's Miami Resident Agent Office (``Miami Office'') and Tampa Field Office visited Lightning, a retail store located
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238992A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238992A1.pdf
  • and First Class U.S. Mail Nacogdoches, TX 75963 CITATION Released: July 7, 2003 By the Enforcement Bureau, Dallas Office: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Mr. David P. Pace, Jr. d.b.a. Pacetronics / Pace Marketing for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules. 2. An investigation by the FCC's Dallas Office revealed that the Internet domain name PACERADIOS.COM is registered to Pace Marketing, David Pace, P.O. Box 631207, Nacogdoches, TX 75963 with Pace Marketing, David Pace listed as the administrative contact. Furthermore, on June 30, 2003, Mr. David P. Pace, Jr. d.b.a. Pacetronics / Pace Marketing through its Internet
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-239077A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-239077A1.pdf
  • of ) ) Stephen Fowler ) d/b/a Exports R Us ) File No. EB-00-OR-104 Pineville, Louisiana ) NAL/Acct.No. X3262010 NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE By the Enforcement Bureau, New Orleans Field Office: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, we find that Stephen Fowler d/b/a Exports R Us (``Exports R Us'') has apparently violated Sections 2.803 and 2.815 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by marketing an unauthorized external radio frequency power amplifier. We conclude that Exports R Us is apparently liable for forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. Exports R Us operates an Internet Web site offering numerous external radio frequency power amplifiers for sale. The Internet Web address for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-239161A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-239161A1.pdf
  • ) ) File No. EB-01-MA-022 Electronics Unlimited ) Miami, Florida ) NAL/Acct. No. 200232700001 ) NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE Released: October 23, 2001 By the Enforcement Bureau, Miami Office: INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, we find that Electronics Unlimited apparently violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules, by marketing a non-compliant high-power cordless telephone (``Alcon, AT526''). We conclude that Electronics Unlimited is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000). II BACKGROUND On July 20, 2001, agents from the Enforcement Bureau's Miami Office visited Electronics Unlimited, a retail store located at 4995 N.W. 72nd Avenue, Suite 102, Miami,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-240649A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-240649A1.pdf
  • Service, Inc. ) File No. EB-03-DT-742 ) Austintown, Ohio ) Citation No. C20043236001 CITATION Released: October 21, 2003 By the Enforcement Bureau, Detroit Office: This is an official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Consumer Electronics Service, Inc. (``Consumer Electronics'') for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 2.815(b) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). On July 24, 2003, agents from the Detroit Office of the Federal Communications Commission (``FCC'') inspected radio transmitting equipment at Consumer Electronics, 5407 Mahoning Avenue, Austintown, Ohio. They found two models of a Citizens Band radiofrequency amplifier (``linear'') for sale, in violation of the FCC's marketing Rules. The linears were a Matco 225
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-240989A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-240989A1.pdf
  • The CB Shop ) ) Citation No. C20043236002 North Jackson, Ohio ) CITATION Released: October 31, 2003 By the Enforcement Bureau, Detroit Office: This is an official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Paliden Communications D/B/A The CB Shop (``Paliden'') for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 2.815(b) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). On July 24, 2003, agents from the Detroit Office of the Federal Communications Commission (``FCC'') inspected radio transmitting equipment at Paliden, 12274 Mahoning Avenue, Suite 14, North Jackson, Ohio. They found one model of a Citizens Band radiofrequency amplifier (``linear'') for sale, in violation of the FCC's marketing Rules. The linear was a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243044A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243044A1.pdf
  • Receipt Requested Clayton, TX 75637 and First Class U.S. Mail CITATION Released: January 7, 2004 By the Enforcement Bureau, Dallas Office: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Mr. Jonathan Edward Stone d.b.a. Omnitronics / Pacetronics for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules. 2. An investigation by the FCC's Dallas Office revealed that on December18, 2003, Mr. Jonathan Edward Stone d.b.a. Omnitronics / Pacetronics through the Internet site(s) www.pacetronics.com (with an address listed on the site as Omnitronics, P.O. Box 42, Clayton, TX 75637) offered for sale, the following thirty (30) non-certified Citizens Band transceivers: NAME MODEL PRICE DESCRIPTION
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-244171A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-244171A1.pdf
  • Palco Electronics, Inc. ) File No. EB-04-DT-062 ) Southgate, Michigan ) Citation No. C20043236003 ) CITATION Released: February 20, 2004 By the Enforcement Bureau, Detroit Office: This is an official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Palco Electronics, Inc. (``Palco'') for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). On February 10, 2004, Palco offered for sale at their store located at 18676 Eureka Road, Southgate, Michigan, the following non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceivers: NAME MODEL COST President Lincoln $269.99 Ranger Communications American Spirit (SS-3900 EGHPA) $199.99 Ranger RCI 2950 DX $269.99 Ranger RCI 2970 DX $399.99 Ranger RCI 6900F Turbo $454.99 Ranger RCI
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-245209A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-245209A1.pdf
  • First Class mail CITATION Citation No.: C200432480001 Released: March 19, 2004 By the Enforcement Bureau, Atlanta Office 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b) of The Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Mr. Jim Norton, owner of CB Sales and Service, Anniston, Alabama, for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 2 and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules.3 2. An investigation by the FCC's Atlanta Office revealed that on March 11, 2004, you offered for sale at your retail store located at 190E Lenlock Lane, Anniston, Alabama, eight models of non-certified Citizens Band transceivers, namely, a Galaxy model DX66V, a Galaxy model DX 73V, a Galaxy model 48T Big Rig Series, a Galaxy model
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-246125A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-246125A1.pdf
  • Walcott, IA 52773 Return Receipt Requested and First Class U.S. Mail CITATION Released: April 7, 2004 By the Enforcement Bureau, Dallas Office: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Mr. Lamont Davidson d.b.a. Walcott CB Sales, Inc. for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules. An investigation by the FCC's Dallas Office revealed that the Internet domain name walcottcb.com is registered to Walcott CB Sales, Inc., 2940 North Plainview Road, Walcott, Iowa 52773 with Lamont Davidson, Walcott CB Sales, Inc. listed as the administrative and technical contact. Furthermore, on February 24, 2004, Mr. Lamont Davidson d.b.a. Walcott CB Sales, Inc. through
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-246127A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-246127A1.pdf
  • First Class mail CITATION Citation No.: C200432980001 Released: March 30, 2004 By the Enforcement Bureau, Seattle Office 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b) of The Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Mr. Les Elliot, owner of ImTec Electronics of Spokane Valley, WA, for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 2 and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules.3 2. An investigation by the FCC's Seattle Office revealed that on March 11, 2004, you offered for sale at your retail store located at 11200 E. Sprague Ave. non-certified Citizens Band (CB) transceivers, namely, Galaxy Models DX series , and Amateur service transceivers, namely, RCI Models-2950 and 6900F (modifiable) for CB use. According to Commission's records,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-246339A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-246339A1.pdf
  • No. EB-04-DT-225 ) Pinconning, Michigan ) Citation No. C20043236004 ) CITATION Released: April 13, 2004 By the Enforcement Bureau, Detroit Office: This is an official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Gambler's C.B. & Ham Radio Sales & Service (``Gambler's'') for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 2.815(b) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). On April 9, 2004, Gambler's offered for sale at their store located at 4671 North Huron Road, Pinconning, Michigan, the following non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceivers: NAME MODEL COST Ranger RCI 2970 DX $449.95 Ranger RCI 2980 WX $449.95 Ranger RCI 2985 DX $479.95 Ranger RCI 6300 F $329.95 Galaxy DX33HML $198.95 Galaxy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-248154A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-248154A1.pdf
  • First Class mail CITATION Citation No.: C200432480002 Released: May 4, 2004 By the Enforcement Bureau, Atlanta Office 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b) of The Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Mr. Gary Linder, owner of Appalachia Electronics CB Shop, Knoxville, Tennessee, for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 2 and Sections 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules.3 2. An investigation by the FCC's Atlanta Office revealed that on April 27, 2004, you offered for sale at your retail store located at 615 Watt Road, Knoxville, Tennessee, Alabama, four models of non-certified Citizens Band transceivers, namely, three Connex models 3300 HP, and one Galaxy model 66. According to Commission's records, these devices have not
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249191A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249191A1.pdf
  • ) ) File No. EB-04-PO-003 ) Chino, California ) Citation No. C20043292003 CITATION Released: June 24, 2004 By the Resident Agent, Portland Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to FLECO Corporation (``FLECO'') for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). Investigation by the FCC's Portland Office revealed that on August 5, 2003, FLECO Corporation sold two handheld wireless microphones, model WR-422-U, to the Club Works Sound and Lighting, 3385 Hawthorne Avenue, NE, Salem, Oregon (Invoice Number 425379). These wireless microphones subsequently were sold to and used by The Oasis restaurant and caused interference
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249275A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249275A1.pdf
  • ) File No. EB-04-NY-160 ) Fair Lawn, New Jersey ) Citation No. C20043238002 ) CITATION Released: July 1, 2004 By the Enforcement Bureau, New York Office: This is an official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Community Communications, Inc. (``Community'') for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). On June 25, 2004, Community offered for sale at their store located at 7-05 Fair Lawn Avenue, Fair Lawn, New Jersey, the following non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceivers: NAME MODEL COST Galaxy DX 33L $250 Galaxy DX 44V $300 Galaxy DX 66V $325 Galaxy DX 48T $400 Galaxy Mirage 9900 $375 Galaxy Mirage 6600 $350
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249276A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249276A1.pdf
  • ) Salem, Oregon ) Citation No. C20043292004 CITATION Released: June 28, 2004 By the Resident Agent, Portland Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to the Club Works Sound and Lighting (``Club Works'') for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). Investigation by the FCC's Portland Office revealed that on August 5, 2003, the Club Works Sound and Lighting bought two handheld wireless microphones, model WR-422-U, from FLECO Corporation (Invoice Number 425379). These wireless microphones subsequently were sold to and used by The Oasis restaurant and caused interference to amateur radio station WA7ABU on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-251001A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-251001A1.pdf
  • Sand Springs, OK 74063 and First Class U.S. Mail CITATION Released: August 6, 2004 By the Enforcement Bureau, Dallas Office: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Messrs. Brandon Smith and John Jackson d.b.a. Wholesale CB Radio for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 2.815(b)&(c) of the Commission's Rules. , Smith & Jackson Inc., 1032 N. Birch, Sand Springs, OK 74063 listed as the administrative and technical contact. Furthermore, on July 29, 2004, Messrs. Brandon Smith and John Jackson d.b.a. Wholesale CB Radio through the Internet site www.wholesalecbradio.com (with an address currently listed on the site as ``Wholesale CB Radio, 5320 North Hwy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-253693A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-253693A1.pdf
  • Receipt Requested and First Class U.S. Mail CITATION Released: October 14, 2004 By the Enforcement Bureau, Dallas Office: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Chester J. Massie, Jr. / H and Y Electrical Supply Company, Inc. for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules. On September 20, 2004, the FCC received a confidential report alleging that H and Y Electrical Supply Company was marketing non-certified ``10-meter'' CB transceivers. An investigation by the FCC's Dallas Office revealed that Chester J. Massie, Jr. / H and Y Electrical Supply Company, Inc. is offering for sale in its 2004 / 2005 WHOLESALE CATALOG
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254041A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254041A1.pdf
  • Requested Wilburton, OK 74578 and First Class U.S. Mail CITATION Released: November 2, 2004 By the Enforcement Bureau, Dallas Office: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Mr. Jason Lawrence / Total Communications / CB Radio Trader for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 2.815(b)&(c) of the Commission's Rules. An investigation by the FCC's Dallas Office revealed that the Internet domain name cbradiotrader.com is registered to Total Communications, P.O. Box 761, Wilburton, OK 74578 with Jason Lawrence, 909 West Main, Wilburton, OK 74578 listed as the administrative and billing contact. Furthermore, on August 10, 2004, Mr. Jason Lawrence / Total Communications / CB
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254042A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254042A1.pdf
  • and First Class U.S. Mail CITATION Released: October 29, 2004 By the Enforcement Bureau, Dallas Office: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Barbara A. Karolides / David C. Rose / Pink Lightning Chrome & CB's, Inc. for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 2.815(b)&(c) of the Commission's Rules. An investigation by the FCC's Dallas Office revealed that the Internet domain name pinklightning.com is registered to BigRig Chrome, 526 Smith Lane, Tullahoma, TN 37388 with Andy Beckman, Chrome Helmet Music, 526 Smith Ln, Tullahoma, TN 37388 listed as the administrative and technical contact. Furthermore, on August 25, 2004, Barbara A. Karolides, David C.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254043A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254043A1.pdf
  • you provide may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required. Any knowingly or willfully false statement made in reply to this notice is punishable by fine or imprisonment. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Stephen P. Lee Resident Agent Houston Office Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C. � 503(b)(5) 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b) Id. See also 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803(a)(1), 2.803(a)(2). 47 U.S.C. �301 See 47 C.F.R. �� 15.1 et seq Id. 47 C.F.R. � 15.5(b) 47 U.S.C. � 333 See 47 C.F.R. � 1.80(b)(3) 47 C.F.R. � 15.209 See Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. � 552a(e)(3) 18 U.S.C. � 1001 o p q r � � � q s �� � � � � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254258A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254258A1.pdf
  • Aviv 68012 ) Citation No. C20043292002 Israel ) CITATION Released: November 10, 2004 By the Resident Agent, San Juan Office, South Central Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Netline Communications Technologies, Ltd. (``Netline'') for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). Investigation by the Commission's San Juan Office of the Enforcement Bureau (``San Juan Office'') revealed that Netline sold twenty-three Netline C-Guard HP, high power units, to Cruz Consulting Group. Ten were sold to Cruz Consulting Group on January 20, 2004 on Invoice 42005, and additional thirteen on February 3, 2004 on Invoice 42015. These units
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254259A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254259A1.pdf
  • TX 76463 and First Class U.S. Mail CITATION Released: November 8, 2004 By the Enforcement Bureau, Dallas Office: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Clay Allen Thompson and Clay Thompson, Inc., d.b.a. Clay's Little Radio Shop for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules. An investigation by the FCC's Dallas Office revealed that the Internet domain name claysradioshop.com is registered to Clay's Little Radio Shop, 70503 IH20, Mingus, TX 76463. Furthermore, on November 4, 2004, Clay Allen Thompson / Clay Thompson, Inc., d.b.a. Clay's Little Radio Shop through the use of Internet site www.claysradioshop.com (with the name and address currently
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255184A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255184A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255184A1.txt
  • Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit �� FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: NEWS MEDIA CONTACT: December 13, 2004 Janice Wise at (202) 418-8165 FCC AND SAMSON TECHNOLOGIES ENTER INTO $26,500 CONSENT DECREE CONCERNING EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS Washington, D.C. - The Federal Communications Commission today entered into a Consent Decree with Samson Technologies, Inc. (``Samson'') that resolves possible violations of 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b) and 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(a) concerning Samson's importation and marketing of certain models of multi-track music recording devices. As part of the Consent Decree, Samson will make a $26,500 voluntary payment to the U.S. Treasury and will implement a Compliance Plan aimed at preventing future violations of the Commission's equipment regulations. Action by the Commission on December 8, 2004, by Order (FCC 04-282) Chairman Powell,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255239A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255239A1.pdf
  • West Chicago, IL 60185 Return Receipt Requested and First Class U.S. Mail CITATION Released: December 6, 2004 By the Enforcement Bureau, Dallas Office: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Carl C. Curatola d.b.a. 1 Stop Electronics for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 2.815(b)&(c) of the Commission's Rules. An investigation by the FCC's Dallas Office revealed that the Internet domain name 1stopelectronics.com is registered to 1 Stop, Carl C., 1879 N. Neltnor, West Chicago, IL 60185 with an e-mail address listed as xforce151@aol.com. On July 1, 2004, the State of Illinois dissolved the corporation 1 Stop Electronics, Inc. where Carl Curatola was
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255963A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255963A1.pdf
  • RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED AND FIRST CLASS U.S. MAIL File No.: EB-04-BS-085 Citation Acct. No.: C20053226001 CITATION Released: December 1, 2004 By the Enforcement Bureau, Boston Office: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Gene A. Fricke for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules. 2. Investigation by the FCC's Boston Office revealed that on September 13, 2004, Gene A. Fricke offered for sale, via recorded transmission on the Citizen Band frequency 27.185 MHz (Channel 19), models of non-certified Citizens Band transceivers, namely Galaxy transceiver models. According to the Commission's records, these devices have not received a FCC equipment authorization, which
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257049A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257049A1.pdf
  • No. EB-04-SJ-049 ) San Juan, Puerto Rico ) Citation No. C20043268001 CITATION Released: October 20, 2004 By the San Juan Office, South Central Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Cruz Consulting Group (``Cruz'') for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). Investigation by the Commission's San Juan Office of the Enforcement Bureau (``San Juan Office'') between October 13 & 14, 2004 revealed that Cruz sold twenty three transmitters designed to jam or block wireless communications (``mobile phone jammers'') to the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. The President of Cruz, Mr.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257050A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257050A1.pdf
  • Travel Center ) File No. EB-04-DT-576 ) Dexter, Michigan ) Citation No. C20053236001 ) citation Released: January 28, 2005 By the Enforcement Bureau, Detroit Office: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to TA Travel Center (``TA'') for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). 2. On January 20, 2005, TA offered for sale at their store located at 200 Baker Road, Dexter, Michigan, the following non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceivers: NAME MODEL COST Galaxy DX66V $299.99 Galaxy DX44V $249.99 Galaxy DX99V $399.99 According to the Commission's records, these devices have not received an FCC equipment authorization, which is required
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257051A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257051A1.pdf
  • attn: T. J. Gimple 1610 S. Miller Road Citation No. C20053290001 Buckeye, AZ 85326 Citation By the Enforcement Bureau, Los Angeles Office: Released: January 12, 2005 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Love's Travel Stop for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules. 2. Investigation by the FCC's Los Angeles Office revealed that on January 5, 2005, Love's Travel Stop offered for sale at their retail store at Buckeye, AZ, two models of non-certified Citizens Band transceivers, namely, Galaxy (model numbers DX33HML and DX99V). According to the Commission's records, these devices have not received an FCC equipment authorization which
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257052A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257052A1.pdf
  • EB-04-LA-006 attn: Bill King 820 W. Pima Citation No. C20053290002 Gila Bend, AZ 85337 Citation By the Enforcement Bureau, Los Angeles Office: Released: January 12, 2005 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Love's Travel Stop for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules. 2. Investigation by the FCC's Los Angeles Office revealed that on January 5, 2005, Love's Travel Stop offered for sale at their retail store at Gila Bend, AZ, two models of non-certified Citizens Band transceivers, namely, Galaxy (model numbers DX33HML and DX99V). According to the Commission's records, these devices have not received an FCC equipment authorization
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257053A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257053A1.pdf
  • EB-04-LA-007 attn: Bert Van Dyke P.O. Box 120. Citation No. C20053290003 Quartzsite, AZ 85346 Citation By the Enforcement Bureau, Los Angeles Office: Released: January 12, 2005 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Love's Travel Stop for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules. 2. Investigation by the FCC's Los Angeles Office revealed that on January 5, 2005, Love's Travel Stop offered for sale at their retail store at Quartzsite, AZ, two models of non-certified Citizens Band transceivers, namely, Galaxy (model numbers DX33HML and DX99V). According to the Commission's records, these devices have not received an FCC equipment authorization which
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257054A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257054A1.pdf
  • No.: EB-04-LA-008 attn: Eric Carlton 45-761 Dillon Road Citation No. C20053290004 Coachella, CA 92236 Citation By the Enforcement Bureau, Los Angeles Office: Released: January 12, 2005 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Love's Travel Stop for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules. 2. Investigation by the FCC's Los Angeles Office revealed that on January 5, 2005, Love's Travel Stop offered for sale at their retail store at Coachella, CA, two models of non-certified Citizens Band transceivers, namely, Galaxy (model numbers DX33HML and DX99V). According to the Commission's records, these devices have not received an FCC equipment authorization which
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257055A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257055A1.pdf
  • attn: Randy Harrison 5000 N. Sunland Gin Rd. Citation No.C20053290005 Casa Grande, AZ 85222 Citation By the Enforcement Bureau, Los Angeles Office: Released: January 12, 2005 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Love's Travel Stop for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules. 2. Investigation by the FCC's Los Angeles Office revealed that on January 5, 2005, Love's Travel Stop offered for sale at their retail store at Casa Grande, AZ, two models of non-certified Citizens Band transceivers, namely, Galaxy (model numbers DX33HML and DX99V). According to the Commission's records, these devices have not received an FCC equipment authorization
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257218A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257218A1.pdf
  • SE Return Receipt requested and Soap Lake, WA 98851 First Class mail CITATION Citation No.: C20043298002 Released: May 7, 2004 By the Enforcement Bureau, Seattle Office 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b) of The Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to The Quack Shack, for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 2 Section 2.803(a)(1), Section 2.815(b), and Section 2.815(c) of the Commission's Rules.3 2. An investigation by the FCC's Seattle Office revealed that on May 4, 2004, you offered for sale through your Internet site thequackshack.com, non-certified Citizens Band (CB) transceivers, namely, Galaxy Models DX series, Amateur service transceivers, namely, RCI Models- (modifiable) for CB use, and External Radio Frequency Power Amplifiers (or amplifier
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257375A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257375A1.pdf
  • ) Perrysburg, OH ) Citation No. C20053238001 ) CITATION Released: March 8, 2005 By the District Director, New York Office, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Eugene Dezanett d.b.a. Pro Class Electronics for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). offered for sale, the following sixty (60) non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceivers: NAME MODEL PRICE DESCRIPTION Connex 3300 $224.99 ``Similar to Galaxy DX33HML'' Connex 3300 HP $239.99 Connex 4400 $249.99 Connex 4400 HP $274.99 ``8 Band modifiable'' Connex 4800 DXL $349.99 ``12 bands of illicit channels'' Connex 4800 DXL w/ echo $349.99 ``With Ranger Digital
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258048A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258048A1.pdf
  • New Jersey, 08804 ) Citation No. C20053238002 ) citation Released: April 5, 2005 By the District Director, New York Office, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Travel Centers of America (``TA'') for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). 2. Investigation by the FCC's New York Office revealed that on March 15, 2005, TA offered for sale at their store located at 975 SR 173, Bloomsbury, New Jersey 08804, the following non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceivers: NAME MODEL COST Galaxy DX66V $299.99 Galaxy DX44V $249.99 According to the Commission's records, these devices have not
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-259063A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-259063A1.pdf
  • FRN 0013520705 NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE Released: May 24, 2005 By the District Director, Tampa Field Office, South Central Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Hightech CB Shop (``Hightech'') apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by offering for sale a non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceiver. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Act, that Hightech is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000). II. BACKGROUND On May 9, 2001, the Commission's Tampa Office of the Enforcement Bureau (``Tampa Office'') issued a Citation to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-259804A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-259804A1.pdf
  • File No.: EB-04-LA-133 Citation No.: C20053290006 CITATION Released: June 28, 2005 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Charles E. Vance, III d/b/a CB Candy, for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, Section 2.803(a)(1), Section 2.815(b), and Section 2.815(c) of the Commission's Rules. 2. An investigation by the Commission's Los Angeles Office revealed that on June 28, 2005, you offered for sale non-certified Citizens Band (CB) transceivers, namely, Galaxy Models DX series, Amateur service transceivers, namely, RCI Models- (modifiable) for CB use, and External Radio Frequency Power Amplifiers (or amplifier kits) for CB use.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260457A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260457A1.pdf
  • # 0013411665 NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE Released: July 27, 2005 By the Resident Agent, Portland Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that TravelCenters of America (``TravelCenters'') in Troutdale, Oregon, apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 302(b) of the Commissions Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by offering for sale a non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceiver. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Act, TravelCenters is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000). BACKGROUND On October 25, 2001, an agent from the Enforcement Bureau's Portland Resident Agent Office (``Portland Office'') visited TravelCenters' retail store
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260949A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260949A1.pdf
  • ) File No. EB-04-DT-329 ) Litchfield, OH ) Citation No. C20053236002 ) CITATION Released: September 9, 2005 By the District Director, Detroit Office, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Litchfield Radio (``Litchfield'') for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). An investigation by the Commission's Detroit Office revealed that on July 21, 2005, Litchfield Radio offered for sale at its store in Litchfield, Ohio, the following non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceivers: NAME MODEL PRICE Cobra 150 GTL DX $199.95 Connex CX 3300 $209.95 Connex CX 3300 HP $249.95 Connex CX 4300 HP $309.95 Galaxy DX
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261721A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261721A1.pdf
  • EB-05-AT-023 Chad Jolley ) ) Citation No.: C20063248001 Sparta, Tennessee 38583 ) CITATION Released: October 14, 2005 By the District Director, Atlanta Office, South Central Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Chad Jolley for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 2.815(b) and (c) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). Investigation by the Commission's Atlanta Office of the Enforcement Bureau (``Atlanta Office'') revealed that on August 2, 2005, Mr. Jolley offered for sale in the Beavis CB & PC Shop the following twenty-eight (28) non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceivers: NAME /MODEL PRICE Magnum S-3 $255.00 Magnum S-9 $350.00 Galaxy 95T $489.95
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262094A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262094A1.pdf
  • File No.: EB-05-PO-183 Citation No.: C20063292001 CITATION Released: October 31, 2005 By the Resident Agent, Portland Resident Agent Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Bradley Lynn Kinney, d/b/a Primerush CB Shop, for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, Section 2.803(a)(1), Section 2.815(b), and Section 2.815(c) of the Commission's Rules. 2. An investigation by the Commission's Portland Office revealed that on September 29, 2005, you offered for sale non-certified Citizens Band (CB) transceivers, namely, General Model Lee, Magnum Model S-6, and External Radio Frequency Power Amplifiers, namely Power Devil and Palomar Model Elite 250HD for CB use. According to the Commission's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262555A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262555A1.pdf
  • Citation No: C20063238002 Holtsville, New York 11742 ) CITATION Released: November 29, 2005 By the District Director, New York Office, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Mr. Bob Paul d.b.a. LP Electronics for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). An investigation by agents in the FCC's New York Office revealed that on October 27, 2005, Mr. Bob Paul d.b.a. LP Electronics offered for sale at his retail store located at 1031 Waverly Avenue, Holtsville, New York, six (6) models of non-certified Citizens Band (CB) transceivers, namely: NAME MODEL PRICE DESCRIPTION GALAXY DX 33 HML
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262942A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262942A1.pdf
  • FRN: 0014417414 NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE Released: December 21, 2005 By the Acting District Director, Seattle District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Clegg Industries, Inc. (``Clegg'') in Torrance, California, apparently repeatedly violated Section 302(b) of the Commissions Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by importing and marketing non-authorized radio frequency devices. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Act, Clegg is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000). BACKGROUND On April 10, 2005, a Western Region agent purchased a ``Space Needle'' FM radio at the Space Needle gift shop in Seattle,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262944A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262944A1.pdf
  • EB-05-NY-212 COP-USA, Inc. ) ) Citation No.: C20063238003 Flushing, New York ) CITATION Released: December 22, 2005 By the District Director, New York Office, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to COP-USA, Inc. for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. As explained below, future violations of the Rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. Investigation by the FCC's New York Office revealed that on August 24, 2005, COP-USA, Inc., at its store located at 33-11 College Point Blvd., Flushing, New York
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262945A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262945A1.pdf
  • ) Citation No.: C20063290001 City of Industry, California ) CITATION Released: December 22, 2005 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to COP-USA Inc. for violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. 2. Investigation by the FCC's Los Angeles Office revealed that on November 2, 2005, COP-USA, on its website and at its City of Industry location, marketed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263340A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263340A1.pdf
  • Citation No.: C20063280002 Commerce City, Colorado ) CITATION Released: January 18, 2006 By the District Director, Denver District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Sapp Bros. Truck Stops, Inc., for violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') for marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. 2. Investigation by the FCC's Denver Office revealed that on December 2, 2005, Sapp Bros Truck Stops, Inc., at its Commerce City location, marketed an
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263341A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263341A1.pdf
  • Metamerchant ) ) Citation No.: C20063290002 Laguna Niguel, CA ) CITATION Released: January 20, 2006 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Jason Kaltenbach, d/b/a Metamerchant, for violation of 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a) of the Commissions Rules. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that on September 1, 2005, Jason Kaltenbach d/b/a Metamerchant, offered for sale ``Field Programmable VHF Portable Radio-MURS- Full Range 136-174 MHz'' and ``Key Pad Programmable UHF Portable Radio w/GMRS Band 400-470 MHz.'' According to Commission records, these devices have not received an FCC equipment authorization which is
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263483A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263483A1.pdf
  • Fricke at his address of record. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dennis Loria District Director Boston Office Northeast Region Enforcement Bureau 47 U.S.C. � 301. 47 U.S.C. � 503(b). Fricke's CB station has been the subject of prior FCC investigations. On December 1, 2004, the Boston Office issued a Citation to Mr. Fricke for violating Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Rules by advertising for sale non-certified CB transceivers. On December 3, 2004, in response to complaints of continuous operation on CB Channel 19, the Boston Office issued a warning letter to Mr. Fricke for failure to limit the length of communications as required under Section 95.416 of the Rules, and imposed restrictions on the operation of any base
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264046A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264046A1.pdf
  • Director, Dallas Office, South Central Region, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Love's Travel Stops and Country Stores, Inc. (``Loves'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) for willful and repeated violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). Specifically, we find Loves apparently liable for offering for sale radio frequency devices without the required Commission equipment authorization. background Section 302 of the Act authorizes the Commission to make reasonable regulations, consistent with the public interest, governing the interference potential of equipment that emits radio frequency energy, and prohibits, inter alia, the offering for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264049A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264049A1.pdf
  • 2by2security.com. ) ) Citation No.: C20063290003 Los Angeles, California ) CITATION Released: February 24, 2006 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to 2by2security.com for violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. 2. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that on February 1, 2006, 2by2security.com, on its website, marketed unauthorized radio devices, specifically five models of 900MHz to 1.23 GHz wireless cameras, models LJ109, LJ129, LJ117, LJ118 and LJ119, and associated receivers, which have
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264507A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264507A1.pdf
  • FOR FORFEITURE Released: March 22, 2006 By the District Director, Los Angeles Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Charles E. Vance, III d/b/a/ CB Candy Electronics (Vance) in Ontario, California, apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 302(b) of the Commissions Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 2.815(c) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by offering for sale non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceivers and external RF power amplifiers. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Act, that Vance is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000). BACKGROUND On June 28, 2005, an agent from the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264848A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264848A1.pdf
  • 94 ) NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE Released: March 31, 2006 By the District Director, Detroit Office, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Gambler's CB & Ham Radio Sales & Service (``Gambler's'') apparently willfully violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934 as amended, (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by offering for sale non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceivers. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Act, that Gambler's is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000). BACKGROUND On April 5, 2004, the FCC Enforcement Bureau's Detroit Field Office (``Detroit Office'') received information that Gambler's was marketing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264948A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264948A1.pdf
  • 94 ) NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE Released: March 31, 2006 By the District Director, Detroit Office, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Gambler's CB & Ham Radio Sales & Service (``Gambler's'') apparently willfully violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934 as amended, (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (the ``Rules''), by offering for sale non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceivers. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Act, that Gambler's is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000). BACKGROUND On April 5, 2004, the FCC Enforcement Bureau's Detroit Field Office (``Detroit Office'') received information that Gambler's was marketing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265629A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265629A1.pdf
  • Director, Detroit Office, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Wesley (``Wes'') Noe, d.b.a. GI Joe's Radio Electronics and GI Joe's CB Radio (collectively referred to herein as ``GI Joe's'') apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934 as amended, (``Act''), and Sections 2.803(a)(1), 2.815(b), and 2.815(c) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by offering for sale non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceivers and external radio frequency (``RF'') power amplifiers. Specifically, Noe willfully and repeatedly violated Sections 2.803(a)(1), 2.815(b), and 2.815(c) of the Rules by offering for sale non-certified CB transceivers and RF power amplifiers on the GI Joe's Radio Electronics' web site. Noe also willfully
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265673A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265673A1.pdf
  • ) ) File No.: EB-05-LA-308 Citation No.: C20063290004 CITATION Released: May 10, 2006 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to CB & Ham Radio Shop, for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, Section 2.803(a)(1), Section 2.815(b), and Section 2.815(c) of the Commission's Rules. 2. An investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that on April 13, 2006, CB & Ham Radio Shop offered for sale non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceivers, namely, Galaxy Models DX88 & DX99 modified for CB use, and Texas Star External Radio Frequency Power Amplifiers for CB use. According
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265693A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265693A1.pdf
  • Citation No.: C20063290005 Centerville, OH ) CITATION Released: May 17, 2006 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to MCM - In One (``MCM'') for violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. 2. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that on March 7, 2006, MCM, in a printed mail order catalog which was copyrighted 2006 and sent to a California address, and on its website, marketed an unauthorized radio device, specifically Defender model 82-6330
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265891A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265891A1.pdf
  • ) ) ) ) File No.: EB-06-LA-139 Citation No.: C20063290006 CITATION Released: June 6, 2006 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Camacho Electronic, for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1)of the Commission's Rules. 2. An investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that on May 4, 2006, Camacho Electronic offered for sale non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceivers, namely, Galaxy Model DX99 and other non-certified Galaxy models. According to Commission's records, these devices have not received an FCC equipment authorization which is required for Citizens Band transmitters marketed in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266080A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266080A1.pdf
  • ) ) Citation No.: C200632400002 Milton, PA 17847 ) CITATION Released: April 12, 2006 By the District Director, Philadelphia Office, Office, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Brian Snook/All American Plazas, Inc. for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commissions Rules. Investigation by the FCC's Philadelphia Office revealed that on February 23, 2006, Brian Snook/All American Plazas, Inc. offered for sale the following non-certified Citizen Band transceivers: Name Model Millennium 2002 Magnum S-9 Connex 4800 DXL President General LEE According to the Commission's records, these devices have not received an FCC equipment authorization which is required for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266229A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266229A1.pdf
  • Inc. ) ) Citation No.: C20063240002 Milton, PA 17847 ) CITATION Released: June 23, 2006 By the Acting District Director, Philadelphia Office, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to All American Plazas, Inc. for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules. An investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Philadelphia Office revealed that on February 23, 2006, All American Plazas, Inc. offered for sale the following non-certified Citizen Band transceivers: Make Model Millennium 2002 Magnum S-9 Connex 4800 DXL President General LEE According to the Commission's records, these devices have not received an FCC equipment authorization which is required
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267102A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267102A1.pdf
  • Highland Avenue ) Citation No.: C20063294001 Highland, California 92346 ) CITATION Released: August 23, 2006 By the District Director, San Diego District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Sentry Tech Systems for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's San Diego Office and reports from County of Riverside personnel revealed that on August 1, 2006, the source of harmful radio interference to a Public Safety two-way radio communications system in the 820 MHz band was a wireless video camera transmitting in the same frequency band. The video camera was located
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267710A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267710A1.pdf
  • Suite 500 ) Citation No.: C20063270006 Tampa, FL 33618 ) CITATION Released: September 28, 2006 By the District Director, Tampa Office, South Central Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an Official Citation, issued to Coverage Solutions Corporation (``CSC'') pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 2.925(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). Investigation by the Commission's Tampa Office of the Enforcement Bureau (``Tampa Office'') determined that CSC imported several dual band radio frequency amplifiers into the United States in early January 2006. All of the units in question were of the same model, and none were labeled with the required FCC Identification (``FCC ID''). The
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268222A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268222A1.pdf
  • Inc. ) ) Citation No.: C20073280001 Coral Springs, FL 33071 ) ) CITATION Released: October 19, 2006 By the District Director, Denver District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to DL Management, Inc., for violation of 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Denver Office revealed that on October 1, 2006, DL Management offered for sale multiple "DMX DM-306 Wireless Microphones," eBay Item number 280005050103, seller "hwy836," on the eBay auction site. According to Commission records, these devices have not received an FCC equipment authorization which is required for transmitters marketed in the United
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268223A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268223A1.pdf
  • ) Citation No.: C20073290001 Van Nuys, California ) CITATION Released: October 20, 2006 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to All Electronics Corporation for violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. 2. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that on September 30, 2006, All Electronics Corporation, marketed unauthorized radio devices, specifically wireless cameras Model 203CA, and associated receivers, which have not been certificated for sale or use in the United States. 3. Section
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268422A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268422A1.pdf
  • OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE Released: November 9, 2006 By the District Director, Los Angeles Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Jason Kaltenbach (``Kaltenbach'') d/b/a/ Metamerchant in Laguna Nigel, California, apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 302(b) of the Commissions Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by offering for sale non-certified VHF and UHF transceivers. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Act, that Kaltenbach is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000). BACKGROUND On September 1, 2005, an agent from the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office (``Los Angeles Office'') visited Ebay's website. The
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268623A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268623A1.pdf
  • File No.: EB-06-PO-120 Citation No.: C20073292001 CITATION Released: November 16, 2006 By the Resident Agent, Portland Resident Agent Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Rod Irvin, d/b/a D&R Communications, Inc., for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules. 2. An investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Portland Resident Agent Office revealed that on September 5, 2006, Rod Irvin, d/b/a D&R Communications, Inc., offered for sale non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceivers, namely, Cobra 150 GTL DX and Cobra 200 GTL DX models. According to the Commission's records, these devices have not received an FCC equipment authorization
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268873A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268873A1.pdf
  • Citation No. C20073238003 New York, NY ) CITATION Released: November 29, 2006 By the District Director, New York District Office, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to S & D Consulting Int. Ltd. for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's New York Office revealed that S & D Consulting Int. Ltd. marketed electronic devices on its website, specifically, ceremonial bugle insert models CB2003US and CB2006UK. On September 25, 2006, a Commission agent visited the corporate office of S & D Consulting Int. Ltd., and confirmed that the ceremonial bugle inserts
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268874A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268874A1.pdf
  • ) Citation No.: C20073290002 Santa Barbara, CA, 93105 ) CITATION Released: November 28, 2006 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to John M. Friese (``Friese'') for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Rules. An investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that on August 29, 2006, Friese marketed various FM broadcast transmitters (88-108 MHz) assembled from Ramsey Electronics kits, models FM100B, FM25B and FM30B. According to the Commission's records, these devices have not received an FCC equipment authorization, which is required for FM transmitters marketed in the United
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268875A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268875A1.pdf
  • Chi ) ) Citation No.: C20073290003 West Hills, California ) CITATION Released: December 1, 2006 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Jalin Chi for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. 2. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that on November 18, 2006, Jalin Chi marketed unauthorized radio frequency devices, specifically wireless cameras, and associated receivers, operating on 1.2 GHz, which have not been certificated for sale or use in the United States.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268876A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268876A1.pdf
  • Yu ) ) Citation No.: C20073290004 El Monte, California ) CITATION Released: December 1, 2006 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Guang Yu for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. 2. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that on November 18, 2006, Guang Yu, marketed unauthorized radio frequency devices, specifically wireless cameras, and associated receivers, operating on 1.2 GHz, which have not been certificated for sale or use in the United States.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268877A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268877A1.pdf
  • Truong ) ) Citation No.: C20073290005 Anaheim, California ) CITATION Released: December 1, 2006 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Dat Phan Truong for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. 2. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that on November 18, 2006, Dat Phan Truong marketed unauthorized radio frequency devices, specifically wireless cameras, Model AJ-809S, and associated receivers, operating on 1.2 GHz, which have not been certificated for sale or use in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269020A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269020A1.pdf
  • Released: December 12, 2006 By the District Director, Tampa Office, South Central Region, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Ben Metzger dba 1 Stop Communications / 1 Stop CB Shop in Titusville, Florida apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 302(b) of the Commissions Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by offering for sale non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceivers. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Act, that Mr. Metzger is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000). BACKGROUND On March 21, 2006, the Commission's Tampa Office of the Enforcement Bureau (``Tampa Office'') issued Mr. Metzger / 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269022A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269022A1.pdf
  • Ave ) Citation No.: C20073294001 Garden Grove, California 92845 ) CITATION Released: November 16, 2006 By the District Director, San Diego District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Caught On Tape for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's San Diego Office and reports from Federal Aviation Administration personnel revealed that on September 13, 2006, the source of harmful radio interference to a Tactical Air Navigation (TACAN) system in the 1070 MHz band was a transmitter used in a video surveillance system in the same frequency band. The transmitter was
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269176A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269176A1.pdf
  • SJT Enterprises ) Bartonsville, PA ) ) Citation No.: C20073232001 ) CITATION Released: December 20, 2006 By the District Director, Chicago District Office, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to SJT Enterprises (``SJT'') for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules. 2. On November 11, 2006, an agent from this office observed SJT offering for sale non-certified 1.2 GHz video transmitters at ``Trainfest 2006,'' which was held at the Wisconsin State Fair Grounds in West Allis, Wisconsin. The agent also observed SJT offer for sale video transmitters that operate on 2.4 GHz. Your web site was also
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269802A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269802A1.pdf
  • M.J. Electronics ) ) Citation No. C20073238006 Mount Vernon, NY ) CITATION Released: January 17, 2007 By the District Director, New York District Office, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to M.J. Electronics for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's New York Office revealed that M.J. Electronics offered for sale on its website various non-certified 1.2 GHz video transmitters, and also video transmitters that operate on 2.4 GHz. The transmitters range in output power from 100 mW to 1500 mW, and include models MJ-1200MC, MJ-2400VHT, MJ-808HP, MJ-2400VH, and MJ-VT07WP. Section
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269803A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269803A1.pdf
  • ) ) Citation No.: C20073296002 Red Bluff, CA 96080 ) CITATION Released: January 17, 2007 By the District Director, San Francisco District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Yak Yak Shack for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's San Francisco Office revealed that on September 19, 2006, Yak Yak Shack offered for sale non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceivers, namely, Galaxy Models DX95T and Galaxy DX99V, and Ranger Models RCI 2950DX and RCI 2970DX. According to the Commission's records, these devices have not received a FCC equipment authorization which is
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269877A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269877A1.pdf
  • Supply ) ) Citation No.: C20073290006 Richardson, Texas ) CITATION Released: January 23, 2007 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Self Defense Supply for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. 2. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that on December 7, 2006, Self Defense Supply via their internet website, marketed unauthorized radio devices, specifically wireless cameras Model AJ-809S and AJ007S, and associated receivers, which have not been certificated for sale or use
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269878A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269878A1.pdf
  • PepBoys Auto ) ) Citation No.: C20073290007 Artesia, California ) CITATION Released: January 23, 2007 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to PepBoys Auto for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. 2. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that on December 12 2006, PepBoys Auto marketed unauthorized radio frequency devices, specifically Music Gear Audio Transmitter, Model MP1058, which have not been certificated for sale or use in the United States. 3. Section 302(b)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269879A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269879A1.pdf
  • ) ) Citation No.: C20073290008 Duarte, California ) CITATION Released: January 23, 2007 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Spittys Wholesale Specialty Products for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. 2. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that on November 25, 2006, at the Crossroads of the West Gun Show at the Orange County Fairgrounds, Spittys Wholesale Specialty Products, marketed unauthorized radio devices, specifically wireless surveillance cameras manufactured by Lianyida (LYD) Corporation,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269880A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269880A1.pdf
  • ORVAC Electronics ) ) Citation No.: C20073290009 Fullerton, California ) CITATION Released: January 23, 2007 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to ORVAC Electronics for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. 2. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that on November 22, 2006, ORVAC Electronics, marketed unauthorized radio devices, specifically multiple models of wireless surveillance cameras manufactured by LYD, and COP Security, and associated receivers, which have not been certificated for sale or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269881A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269881A1.pdf
  • DuVac Electronics ) ) Citation No.: C20073290010 Pasadena, California ) CITATION Released: January 23, 2007 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to DuVac Electronics for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. 2. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that on November 6, 2006, DuVac Electronics marketed unauthorized radio devices, specifically wireless cameras Model 2YD802CH and COP2400BTJ, and associated receivers, which have not been certificated for sale or use in the United States. 3.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269882A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269882A1.pdf
  • ) Citation No.: C20073294002 Marina Del Rey, California 90292 ) CITATION Released: January 22, 2007 By the District Director, San Diego District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Ditec Digital Systems for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's San Diego Office and reports from Federal Aviation Administration (``FAA'') personnel revealed that on October 27, 2006, the source of harmful radio interference to the FAA's Distance Measuring Equipment (``DME'') system in the 1080 MHz band was a transmitter used in a video surveillance system operating in the same frequency band.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270447A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270447A1.pdf
  • Inc. ) ) Citation No.: C20073290011 Huntington Beach, CA ) CITATION Released: February 6, 2007 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Big Lots, Inc., for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that on December 14, 2006, Big Lots, Inc., at their retail store #4088, 21082 Beach Blvd., Huntington Beach, CA 92648 , marketed unauthorized radio devices, specifically, Travel Solutions, wireless optical mouse, item #550-20-531, which has not
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270627A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270627A1.pdf
  • File No.: EB-06-LA-252 Citation No.: C20073290012 CITATION Released: February 14, 2007 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to David Pace Jr., d/b/a 4:13 Electronics for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803(a)(1), 2.815(b), 2.815(c) of the Commission's Rules. 2. An investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles District Office revealed that on December 7, 2006, David Pace Jr., d/b/a 4:13 Electronic, offered for sale non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceivers, namely, Galaxy Model DX 99V and external power amplifiers, namely, Texas Star 250 HDV, 400V and 667V, and others. According to the Commission's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270629A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270629A1.pdf
  • Inc. ) ) Citation No.: C20073290013 Rancho Cucamonga, California ) CITATION Released: February 14, 2007 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Monoprice, Inc. for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. 2. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that on January 19, 2007, Monoprice, Inc., marketed unauthorized radio devices, specifically wireless surveillance cameras, Model ZT-809A, and associated receivers, which have not been certificated for sale or use in the United States. 3. Section
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270630A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270630A1.pdf
  • No.: EB-06-LA-309 CensusPC ) ) Citation No.: C20073290014 Walnut, California ) CITATION Released: February 14, 2007 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to CensusPC for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. 2. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that on January 19, 2007, CensusPC, marketed unauthorized radio devices, specifically wireless surveillance cameras, Model SBT-SCNV, and associated receivers, which have not been certificated for sale or use in the United States. 3. Section 302(b)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270804A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270804A1.pdf
  • Valley, Oklahoma 73075 ) CITATION Released: September 29, 2006 By the District Director, Dallas Office, South Central Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Stephen L. Tork d.b.a. Hotshot CB II (``Stephen L. Tork'') for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803(a)(1), 2.815(b) and 2.815(c) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). Investigation by the Commission's Dallas Office of the Enforcement Bureau (``Dallas Office'') revealed that on July 21, 2006, Stephen L. Tork offered for sale non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceivers, namely, Galaxy models DX55V and DX48T, Superstar model 121, General model AP Hill, and Northpoint model NT-9-HP. These transceivers did not have FCC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270805A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270805A1.pdf
  • 2006 By the District Director, Dallas Office, South Central Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Cindy Tork, Stephen L. Tork, Fred Cordell, Kimla Cordell d.b.a. CBs At Their Best (``CBs At Their Best'') for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803(a)(1), 2.815(b) and 2.815(c) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). Investigation by the Commission's Dallas Office of the Enforcement Bureau revealed that on July 19, 2006, CBs At Their Best, through the use of internet website www.cbsattheirbest.net, offered for sale thirty non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceivers as follows: Brand Model Price Connex 3300 $185.00 Connex 3300HP $220.00 Connex 3300LEHP $230.00 Connex 3300Patriot
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270806A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270806A1.pdf
  • 73128 ) CITATION Released: September 29, 2006 By the District Director, Dallas Office, South Central Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Joann Anson d.b.a. Striker Antennas and as Striker CB Shop (``Joann Anson'') for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). An investigation by the Commission's Dallas Office of the Enforcement Bureau revealed that on July 20, 2006, Joann Anson offered for sale non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceivers, namely, Connex model 4300HP, Galaxy models DX45MP, DX55T and DX99V, General model Lee, and Magnum models S3, S380, S6 and S9. These transceivers did not have FCC ID
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270807A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270807A1.pdf
  • C20073292003 ) Salem, Oregon 97302 ) ) CITATION Released: February 23, 2007 By the Resident Agent, Portland Resident Agent Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Michael T. Kersnowski d/b/a RadioActive Radio for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803(a)(1), 2.815(b) and 2.815(c) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). Investigation by the Commission's Portland Resident Agent Office of the Enforcement Bureau revealed that on November 28, 2006, RadioActive Radio, through the use of internet website www.RadioActiveRadios.com, offered for sale forty-four non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceivers as follows: Brand Model Connex 3300 HP Connex 4600 Turbo Connex 4300 HP 300 Connex 4300
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270819A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270819A1.pdf
  • services and may subject the operator to severe penalties, this warning emphasizes the importance of complying strictly with these legal requirements. Section 302(b) of the Act provides ``No person shall manufacture, import, sell, offer for sale, or ship devices or home electronic equipment and systems, or use devices, which fail to comply with regulations promulgated pursuant to this section.'' Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Rules provides that ``...no person shall sell or lease, or offer for sale or lease (including advertising for sale or lease), or import, ship or distribute for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease, any radio frequency device unless: (1) In the case of a device subject to certification, such device has been
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270820A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270820A1.pdf
  • services and may subject the operator to severe penalties, this warning emphasizes the importance of complying strictly with these legal requirements. Section 302(b) of the Act provides ``No person shall manufacture, import, sell, offer for sale, or ship devices or home electronic equipment and systems, or use devices, which fail to comply with regulations promulgated pursuant to this section.'' Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Rules provides that ``...no person shall sell or lease, or offer for sale or lease (including advertising for sale or lease), or import, ship or distribute for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease, any radio frequency device unless: (1) In the case of a device subject to certification, such device has been
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272112A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272112A1.pdf
  • EB-07-DT-088 ) Battle Creek, MI ) Citation No. C20073236001 ) CITATION Released: March 19, 2007 By the District Director, Detroit Office, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Te-Khi Travel Court, Inc. (``Te-Khi'') for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). An investigation by the Commission's Detroit Office revealed that on February 16, 2007, Te-Khi offered for sale at its store at 15874 11 Mile Road, Battle Creek, Michigan, the following non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceivers: NAME MODEL PRICE QUANTITY Cobra 200 GTL DX $319.95 1 Cobra 150 GTL DX $229.89 4 Ranger RCI-6300 F25 $324.99
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272196A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272196A1.pdf
  • Communications ) ) Citation No.: C20073296003 Los Banos, California ) CITATION Released: March 29, 2007 By the District Director, San Francisco District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to R. P. Communications for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules. An investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's San Francisco Office revealed that on January 24, 2007, R.P. Communications offered for sale non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceivers, namely, Cobra models 150 GTL DX and Cobra 200 GTL DX , Ranger RCI2950DX, Superstar 36, and the General models General Hill, General Longstreet and the General Sherman. When asked about
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-273556A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-273556A1.pdf
  • No: C20073238009 Montgomery, New York 12549 ) CITATION May 15, 2007 By the District Director, New York Office, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Mr. Richard Musa DBA Blade Runner Knife Company for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). An investigation by the FCC's New York Office revealed that on May 5, 2007, Mr. Richard Musa DBA Blade Runner Knife Company offered for sale at his retail store located at 202 Montgomery Road, Montgomery, New York, three (3) models of non-certified Citizens Band (CB) transceivers, namely: NAME MODEL PRICE DESCRIPTION COBRA 29LTD $165.00 ``30
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-274073A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-274073A1.pdf
  • Lots, Inc. ) ) Citation No.: C20073290021 Cerritos, CA ) CITATION Released: June 4, 2007 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Big Lots, Inc., for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that on May 17, 2007, Big Lots, Inc., at their retail store #4076, in Cerritos, California, marketed unauthorized radio devices, specifically, the Emerson Ultimate Headset, model MH2001, which has not been certificated for sale or use
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275913A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275913A1.pdf
  • ) Citation No.: C20073270009 Hudson, Florida 34785 ) CITATION Released: August 6, 2007 By the District Director, Tampa Office, South Central Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to High Point Electronics (``High Point Electronics''), for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). An investigation by the Commission's Tampa Office of the Enforcement Bureau (``Tampa Office'') revealed that on February 15, 2007, High Point Electronics offered for sale non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceivers. A partial listing follows: Brand Name Model Price Galaxy DX-55V $269.99 Connex 3300-HP $299.99 Connex 4300-HP $399.99 These transceivers did not have FCC ID labels
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275914A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275914A1.pdf
  • ) ) Citation No.: C20073270010 Wildwood, Florida 34785 ) CITATION Released: August 6, 2007 By the District Director, Tampa Office, South Central Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Mesa CB, Inc. (``Mesa ''), for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). An investigation by the Commission's Tampa Office of the Enforcement Bureau (``Tampa Office'') revealed that on February 15, 2007, Mesa offered for sale non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceivers. A partial listing follows: Brand Name Model Price Galaxy DX-33HML $250.00 Galaxy DX-66V $350.00 Connex 3300-HP $300.00 These transceivers did not have FCC ID labels indicating they
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275915A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275915A1.pdf
  • ) ) Citation No.: C20073270011 Seffner, Florida 33584 ) CITATION Released: August 6, 2007 By the District Director, Tampa Office, South Central Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Racoon's CB Repair, Inc. (``Racoon''), for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). Investigation by the Commission's Tampa Office of the Enforcement Bureau (``Tampa Office'') revealed that on February 5, 2007, Racoon offered for sale non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceivers. A partial listing follows: Brand Name Model Price Galaxy DX-33HML $260.00 Galaxy DX-44 $270.00 Connex 3300-HP $280.00 According to Commission records, these devices have not received an FCC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276378A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276378A1.pdf
  • OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE Released: August 28, 2007 By the District Director, Denver Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that CB Shop & More, LLLP ("CB Shop"), in Loveland, Colorado, apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by offering for sale a non-certified Citizens Band ("CB") transceiver. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Act, CB Shop is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000). BACKGROUND On November 25, 2002, an agent from the Enforcement Bureau's Denver Office inspected the CB Shop in Loveland, Colorado.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277177A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277177A1.pdf
  • Electronics ) ) Citation No.: C20073296030 Fresno, California 93722 ) CITATION Released: September 25, 2007 By the District Director, San Francisco District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Red Monkey Electronics for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's San Francisco Office revealed that on August 30, 2007, Red Monkey Electronics offered for sale non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceivers, namely, Galaxy Model DX44V and Ranger Model RCI-2970. According to the Commission's records, these devices have not received a FCC equipment authorization which is required for Citizens Band transmitters marketed in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277836A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277836A1.pdf
  • By the District Director, Los Angeles Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that David P. Pace Jr. d/b/a/ Pacetronics / Pace Marketing and 4:13 Electronics / Pacetronics ("Pace"), in Nacogdoches, Texas, apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by offering for sale a non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceiver. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Act, Pace is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000). BACKGROUND In September and December of 2006, and in January of 2007, an investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277840A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277840A1.pdf
  • ) Citation No.: C20073294004 Spring Valley, California 91978 ) CITATION Released: May 22, 2007 By the District Director, San Diego District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Southern California Microwave, Inc. for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules. Investigation on April 4, 2007, by the Enforcement Bureau's San Diego Office revealed that Southern California Microwave, Inc., had offered for sale an uncertified wireless video camera transmitting in the 1845 MHz band. Section 302(b) of the Act states:''[n]o person shall manufacture, import, sell, offer for sale, or ship devices or home electronic equipment and systems,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277887A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277887A1.pdf
  • Inc. ) ) Citation No. C20083290002 Palatine, Illinois ) CITATION Released: October 30, 2007 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to MATCO, Inc., for violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. 2. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that on October 23, 2007, MATCO, Inc., marketed unauthorized radio devices, specifically wireless cameras Models ASK-1204TR (operating on 1.2 GHz) and ASK-2004T-1.7 (operating on 1.7 GHz), and associated receivers, which have not been certificated for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280562A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280562A1.pdf
  • ) ) Citation No.: C200832900006 Fountain Valley, CA ) CITATION Released: February 29, 2008 By the Acting Interim District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Fry's Electronics, for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that on February 21, 2008, Fry's Electronics, at their retail store in Fountain Valley, California, marketed unauthorized radio devices, specifically, the Zennox, 5 in 1 Wireless Headphones,(XXX) XXXX-XXXX6, which has not been certificated for sale or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281214A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281214A1.pdf
  • ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File Number: EB-08-PO-044 NAL/Acct. No.: 200832920002 FRN: 0017594524 NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE Released: March 28, 2008 By the Resident Agent, Portland Resident Agent Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION , in Salem, Oregon, apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by offering for sale non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceivers. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), that Kersnowski is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000). BACKGROUND , which marketed both non-certified CB transceivers, specifically Galaxy models DX99V and DX66V (also
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282180A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282180A1.pdf
  • Center ) Idaho Falls, Idaho ) Citation No.: C200832920008 ) CITATION Released: May 6, 2008 By the Resident Agent, Portland Resident Agent Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Dad's Travel Center for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Portland Resident Agent Office revealed that on April 2, 2008, Dad's Travel Center offered for sale the following non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceivers at its store in Idaho Falls, Idaho: Connex Model 3300HP Galaxy Model DX 33HML Magnum Model S-3 Magnum Model S-6 According to Commission records these devices have
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282250A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282250A1.pdf
  • ) ) Citation No.: C200832900012 Whittier, CA ) CITATION Released: April 21, 2008 By the Acting Interim District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Greg's Pro Audio, for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that on April 1, 2008, Greg's Pro Audio, at their retail store in Whittier, California, marketed unauthorized radio devices, specifically, the ARK WRT 4968 Wireless Microphone, which has not been certificated for sale or use in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282251A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282251A1.pdf
  • Citation No.: C200832900013 Las Vegas, NV ) CITATION Released: April 21, 2008 By the Acting Interim District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to 4 KAMM International, Inc., for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that on January 23, 2008, 4 KAMM International, Inc., at their wholesale distribution outlet in Las Vegas, Nevada, marketed unauthorized radio devices, specifically, the Zennox, 5 in 1 Wireless Headphones, UPC 53163-47026, which has not been
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282252A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282252A1.pdf
  • Enterprises ) ) Citation No.: C200832900014 City of Industry, CA ) CITATION Released: April 21, 2008 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to EJ Enterprises, for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that on January 21, 2008, EJ Enterprises, at their distribution business in City of Industry, California, marketed unauthorized radio devices, specifically, the Zennox, 5 in 1 Wireless Headphones, UPC 53163-47026, which has not been certificated for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282253A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282253A1.pdf
  • ) ) Citation No.: C200832900015 Sante Fe Springs, CA ) CITATION Released: April 21, 2008 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Max Sales Group, for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that on February 20, 2008, Max Sales Group, at their distribution business in Sante Fe Springs, California, marketed unauthorized radio devices, specifically, the Zennox, 5 in 1 Wireless Headphones, UPC 53163-47026, which has not been certificated
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282596A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282596A1.pdf
  • OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE Released: May 30, 2008 By the Acting Interim District Director, Los Angeles Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Orvac Electronics, Inc. ("Orvac"), in Fullerton, California, apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by marketing non-certified 2.4 GHz wireless video transmitters and wireless cameras (intentional radiators). We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Act, that Orvac is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000). BACKGROUND On November 22, 2006, an agent from the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office inspected Orvac's retail
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283836A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283836A1.pdf
  • Enterprises ) ) Citation No.: C200832900016 Hollywood, CA ) CITATION Released: July 17, 2008 By the Acting Interim District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Wolfcom Enterprises, for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that on June 11, 2008, Wolfcom Enterprises, at their Hollywood, California, store marketed an unauthorized radio device, specifically, the TB-1255CK 1.2 GHz wireless transmitter, which has not been certificated for sale or use in the United
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284304A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284304A1.pdf
  • the District Director, Detroit Office, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Phillip Symonds and Darda Troyer d.b.a. Flat River Discount Electronics and Hi-Delite Restaurant, Inc. (referred to herein jointly as ``Flat River'') for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803(a)(1), 2.815(b) and 2.815(c) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Detroit Office revealed that, on July 10, 2008, Flat River offered for sale the following non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceivers at its store in Greenville, Michigan: Ranger Model RCI 2950; Galaxy Model DX44V; Connex Model 3300. According to the Commission's records, these devices have not received an
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290028A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290028A1.pdf
  • Citation No. C200932360001 Jackson, MI ) CITATION Released: April 9, 2009 By the District Director, Detroit Office, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Charles Leach d.b.a. Radio Connection L.L.C. (``Radio Connection'') for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1), of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). 2. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Detroit Office revealed that, on March 6, 2009, Radio Connection offered for sale the following non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceiver at its store in Jackson, Michigan: General Lee Deluxe AM/FM amateur Transceiver. According to the Commission's records, this device has not received an FCC equipment authorization, which is required
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290793A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290793A1.pdf
  • 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. In addition, radio transmitting equipment must comply with FCC rules. Section 333 of the Act prohibits willful or malicious interference with any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under the Act or operated by the United States Government. In addition, Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's rules, prohibit the manufacture, importation, marketing, sale or operation of devices deliberately designed to jam or disrupt wireless communications. The Commission has issued two Public Notices specifically stating that the sale and use of transmitters designed to prevent, jam or interfere with the operation of cellular and personal communications service (``PCS'') telephones is unlawful. Section 303(n) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291892A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291892A1.pdf
  • 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. In addition, radio transmitting equipment must comply with FCC rules. Section 333 of the Act prohibits willful or malicious interference with any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under the Act or operated by the United States Government. In addition, Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's rules, prohibit the manufacture, importation, marketing, sale or operation of devices deliberately designed to jam or disrupt wireless communications. The Commission has issued two Public Notices specifically stating that the sale and use of transmitters designed to prevent, jam or interfere with the operation of cellular and personal communications service (``PCS'') telephones is unlawful. Section 303(n) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293174A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293174A1.pdf
  • 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. In addition, radio transmitting equipment must comply with FCC rules. Section 333 of the Act prohibits willful or malicious interference with any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under the Act or operated by the United States Government. In addition, Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's rules, prohibit the manufacture, importation, marketing, sale or operation of devices deliberately designed to jam or disrupt wireless communications. The Commission has issued two Public Notices specifically stating that the sale and use of transmitters designed to prevent, jam or interfere with the operation of cellular and personal communications service (``PCS'') telephones is unlawful. Section 303(n) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294722A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294722A1.pdf
  • Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''). In addition, radio transmitting equipment must comply with the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). Section 333 of the Act prohibits willful or malicious interference with any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under the Act or operated by the United States Government. In addition, Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a) of the Rules prohibit the manufacture, importation, marketing, sale or operation of devices deliberately designed to jam or disrupt wireless communications. The Commission has issued two Public Notices specifically stating that the sale and use of transmitters designed to prevent, jam or interfere with the operation of cellular and personal communications service (``PCS'') telephones is unlawful. Section 303(n) of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294893A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294893A1.pdf
  • 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. In addition, radio transmitting equipment must comply with FCC rules. Section 333 of the Act prohibits willful or malicious interference with any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under the Act or operated by the United States Government. In addition, Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's rules, prohibit the manufacture, importation, marketing, sale or operation of devices deliberately designed to jam or disrupt wireless communications. The Commission has issued two Public Notices specifically stating that the sale and use of transmitters designed to prevent, jam or interfere with the operation of cellular and personal communications service (``PCS'') telephones is unlawful. Section 303(n) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294894A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294894A1.pdf
  • 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. In addition, radio transmitting equipment must comply with FCC rules. Section 333 of the Act prohibits willful or malicious interference with any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under the Act or operated by the United States Government. In addition, Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's rules, prohibit the manufacture, importation, marketing, sale or operation of devices deliberately designed to jam or disrupt wireless communications. The Commission has issued two Public Notices specifically stating that the sale and use of transmitters designed to prevent, jam or interfere with the operation of cellular and personal communications service (``PCS'') telephones is unlawful. Section 303(n) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295045A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295045A1.pdf
  • No.: EB-09-LA-0160 Pinecomputer ) ) Citation No.: C201032900001 Covina, California ) CITATION Released: December 02, 2009 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Pincomputer for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. 2. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that on November 10, 2009, Pinecomputer, located at 740 East Arrow Highway, Covina, California, marketed unauthorized radio frequency devices, specifically model W203CA, 1.2 GHz wireless surveillance cameras, and associated receivers, which have not been certificated
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295198A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295198A1.pdf
  • Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act").1 In addition, radio transmitting equipment must comply with the Commission's Rules ("Rules").2 Section 333 of the Act prohibits willful or malicious interference with any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under the Act or operated by the United States Government.3 In addition, Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a) of the Rules prohibit the manufacture, importation, marketing, sale or operation of devices deliberately designed to jam or disrupt wireless communications.4 The Commission has issued two Public Notices specifically stating that the sale and use of transmitters designed to prevent, jam or interfere with the operation of cellular and personal communications service ("PCS") telephones is unlawful.5 Section 1 47 U.S.C.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295199A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295199A1.pdf
  • Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''). In addition, radio transmitting equipment must comply with the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). Section 333 of the Act prohibits willful or malicious interference with any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under the Act or operated by the United States Government. In addition, Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a) of the Rules prohibit the manufacture, importation, marketing, sale or operation of devices deliberately designed to jam or disrupt wireless communications. The Commission has issued two Public Notices specifically stating that the sale and use of transmitters designed to prevent, jam or interfere with the operation of cellular and personal communications service (``PCS'') telephones is unlawful. Section 303(n) of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296383A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296383A1.pdf
  • Texas 76227 ) CITATION Released: February 5, 2010 By the District Director, Dallas Office, South Central Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to BizCom for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. Investigation by the FCC's Dallas Office revealed that on July 28, 2009, BizCom sold to and installed two ``cell to tower jamming units'' at End Zone Athletics, Arlington, Texas. Section 302(b) of the Act provides that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296856A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296856A1.pdf
  • Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''). In addition, radio transmitting equipment must comply with the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). Section 333 of the Act prohibits willful or malicious interference with any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under the Act or operated by the United States Government. In addition, Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a) of the Rules prohibit the manufacture, importation, marketing, sale or operation of devices deliberately designed to jam or disrupt wireless communications. The Commission has issued two Public Notices specifically stating that the sale and use of transmitters designed to prevent, jam or interfere with the operation of cellular and personal communications service (``PCS'') telephones is unlawful. Section 303(n) of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297152A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297152A1.pdf
  • Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''). In addition, radio transmitting equipment must comply with the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). Section 333 of the Act prohibits willful or malicious interference with any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under the Act or operated by the United States Government. In addition, Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a) of the Rules prohibit the manufacture, importation, marketing, sale or operation of devices deliberately designed to jam or disrupt wireless communications. The Commission has issued two Public Notices specifically stating that the sale and use of transmitters designed to prevent, jam or interfere with the operation of cellular and personal communications service (``PCS'') telephones are unlawful. Section 303(n) of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297155A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297155A1.pdf
  • 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. In addition, radio transmitting equipment must comply with FCC rules. Section 333 of the Act prohibits willful or malicious interference with any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under the Act or operated by the United States Government. In addition, Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803 of the Commission's rules, prohibit the manufacture, importation, marketing, sale or operation of devices deliberately designed to jam or disrupt wireless communications. The Commission has issued two Public Notices specifically stating that the sale and use of transmitters designed to prevent, jam or interfere with the operation of cellular and personal communications service (PCS) telephones is unlawful. The operation of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297433A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297433A1.pdf
  • 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. In addition, radio transmitting equipment must comply with FCC rules. Section 333 of the Act prohibits willful or malicious interference with any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under the Act or operated by the United States Government. In addition, Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803 of the Commission's rules, prohibit the manufacture, importation, marketing, sale or operation of devices deliberately designed to jam or disrupt wireless communications. The Commission has issued two Public Notices specifically stating that the sale and use of transmitters designed to prevent, jam or interfere with the operation of cellular and personal communications service (PCS) telephones is unlawful. The operation of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298538A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298538A1.pdf
  • Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''). In addition, radio transmitting equipment must comply with the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). Section 333 of the Act prohibits willful or malicious interference with any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under the Act or operated by the United States Government. In addition, Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a) of the Rules prohibit the manufacture, importation, marketing, sale or operation of devices deliberately designed to jam or disrupt wireless communications. The Commission has issued two Public Notices specifically stating that the sale and use of transmitters designed to prevent, jam or interfere with the operation of cellular and personal communications service (``PCS'') telephones is unlawful. Section 303(n) of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302947A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302947A1.pdf
  • 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. In addition, radio transmitting equipment must comply with FCC rules. Section 333 of the Act prohibits willful or malicious interference with any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under the Act or operated by the United States Government. In addition, Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803 of the Commission's rules, prohibit the manufacture, importation, marketing, sale or operation of devices deliberately designed to jam or disrupt wireless communications. The Commission has issued two Public Notices specifically stating that the sale and use of transmitters designed to prevent, jam or interfere with the operation of cellular and personal communications service (PCS) telephones is unlawful. The operation of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304360A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304360A1.pdf
  • 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. In addition, radio transmitting equipment must comply with FCC rules. Section 333 of the Act prohibits willful or malicious interference with any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under the Act or operated by the United States Government. In addition, Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803 of the Commission's rules, prohibit the manufacture, importation, marketing, sale or operation of devices deliberately designed to jam or disrupt wireless communications. The Commission has issued two Public Notices specifically stating that the sale and use of transmitters designed to prevent, jam or interfere with the operation of cellular and personal communications service (PCS) telephones is unlawful. The operation of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305288A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305288A1.pdf
  • Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''). In addition, radio transmitting equipment must comply with the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). Section 333 of the Act prohibits willful or malicious interference with any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under the Act or operated by the United States Government. In addition, section 302(b) of the Act, and section 2.803(a) of the Rules prohibit the manufacture, importation, marketing, sale or operation of devices deliberately designed to jam or disrupt wireless communications. The Commission has issued two Public Notices specifically stating that the sale and use of transmitters designed to prevent, jam or interfere with the operation of cellular and personal communications service (``PCS'') telephones is unlawful. Section 303(n) of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305291A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305291A1.pdf
  • 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. In addition, radio transmitting equipment must comply with FCC rules. Section 333 of the Act prohibits willful or malicious interference with any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under the Act or operated by the United States Government. In addition, Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803 of the Commission's rules, prohibit the manufacture, importation, marketing, sale or operation of devices deliberately designed to jam or disrupt wireless communications. The Commission has issued two Public Notices specifically stating that the sale and use of transmitters designed to prevent, jam or interfere with the operation of cellular and PCS telephones is unlawful. The operation of the device utilized
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305292A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305292A1.pdf
  • 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. In addition, radio transmitting equipment must comply with FCC rules. Section 333 of the Act prohibits willful or malicious interference with any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under the Act or operated by the United States Government. In addition, Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803 of the Commission's rules, prohibit the manufacture, importation, marketing, sale or operation of devices deliberately designed to jam or disrupt wireless communications. The Commission has issued two Public Notices specifically stating that the sale and use of transmitters designed to prevent, jam or interfere with the operation of cellular and PCS telephones is unlawful. The operation of the device utilized
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305680A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305680A1.pdf
  • 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. In addition, radio transmitting equipment must comply with FCC rules. Section 333 of the Act prohibits willful or malicious interference with any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under the Act or operated by the United States Government. In addition, Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803 of the Commission's rules, prohibit the manufacture, importation, marketing, sale or operation of devices deliberately designed to jam or disrupt wireless communications. The Commission has issued two Public Notices specifically stating that the sale and use of transmitters designed to prevent, jam or interfere with the operation of cellular and PCS telephones is unlawful. The operation of the device utilized
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306457A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306457A1.pdf
  • 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. In addition, radio transmitting equipment must comply with FCC rules. Section 333 of the Act prohibits willful or malicious interference with any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under the Act or operated by the United States Government. In addition, Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803 of the Commission's rules, prohibit the manufacture, importation, marketing, sale or operation of devices deliberately designed to jam or disrupt wireless communications. The Commission has issued two Public Notices specifically stating that the sale and use of transmitters designed to prevent, jam or interfere with the operation of cellular and PCS telephones is unlawful. The operation of the device utilized
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306905A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306905A1.pdf
  • 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. In addition, radio transmitting equipment must comply with FCC rules. Section 333 of the Act prohibits willful or malicious interference with any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under the Act or operated by the United States Government. In addition, Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803 of the Commission's rules, prohibit the manufacture, importation, marketing, sale or operation of devices deliberately designed to jam or disrupt wireless communications. The Commission has issued two Public Notices specifically stating that the sale and use of transmitters designed to prevent, jam or interfere with the operation of cellular and PCS telephones is unlawful. The operation of the device utilized
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307313A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307313A1.pdf
  • 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. In addition, radio transmitting equipment must comply with FCC rules. Section 333 of the Act prohibits willful or malicious interference with any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under the Act or operated by the United States Government. In addition, section 302(b) of the Act, and section 2.803 of the Commission's rules, prohibit the manufacture, importation, marketing, sale or operation of devices deliberately designed to jam or disrupt wireless communications. The Commission has issued two Public Notices and an Enforcement Advisory specifically stating that the sale and use of transmitters designed to prevent, jam or interfere with the operation of cellular telephones, personal communications service (PCS) telephones, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307485A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307485A1.pdf
  • 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. In addition, radio transmitting equipment must comply with FCC rules. Section 333 of the Act prohibits willful or malicious interference with any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under the Act or operated by the United States Government. In addition, section 302(b) of the Act, and section 2.803 of the Commission's rules, prohibit the manufacture, importation, marketing, sale or operation of devices deliberately designed to jam or disrupt wireless communications. The Commission has issued two Public Notices and an Enforcement Advisory specifically stating that the sale and use of transmitters designed to prevent, jam or interfere with the operation of cellular telephones, personal communications service (PCS) telephones, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308002A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308002A1.pdf
  • 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. In addition, radio transmitting equipment must comply with FCC rules. Section 333 of the Act prohibits willful or malicious interference with any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under the Act or operated by the United States Government. In addition, Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803 of the Commission's rules, prohibits the manufacture, importation, marketing, sale or operation of devices deliberately designed to jam or disrupt wireless communications. The Commission has issued two Public Notices specifically stating that the sale and use of transmitters designed to prevent, jam or interfere with the operation of cellular and personal communications service (PCS) telephones is unlawful. Please see the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310226A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310226A1.txt
  • Enforcement Bureau has issued 20 enforcement actions against online retailers in 12 states for illegally marketing more than 200 uniquely-described models of cell phone jammers, GPS jammers, Wi-Fi jammers, and similar signal jamming devices. These devices have the capacity to prevent, block, or otherwise interfere with authorized radio communications in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act and sections 2.803 and 15.201(b) of the Commission's rules. The Enforcement Bureau's actions are intended to warn retailers and potential purchasers that marketing, selling, or using signal jamming devices in the U.S. is illegal and that the FCC will vigorously prosecute these violations. Enforcement Bureau Chief Michele Ellison said, ``Our actions should send a strong message to retailers of signal jamming devices that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311456A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311456A1.pdf
  • 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. In addition, radio transmitting equipment must comply with FCC rules. Section 333 of the Act prohibits willful or malicious interference with any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under the Act or operated by the United States Government. In addition, Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803 of the Commission's rules, prohibits the manufacture, importation, marketing, sale or operation of devices deliberately designed to jam or disrupt wireless communications. The Commission has issued two Public Notices specifically stating that the sale and use of transmitters designed to prevent, jam or interfere with the operation of cellular and personal communications service (PCS) telephones is unlawful. You are hereby
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312659A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312659A1.pdf
  • 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. In addition, radio transmitting equipment must comply with FCC rules. Section 333 of the Act prohibits willful or malicious interference with any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under the Act or operated by the United States Government. In addition, Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803 of the Commission's rules, prohibit the manufacture, importation, marketing, sale or operation of devices deliberately designed to jam or disrupt wireless communications. The Commission has issued two Public Notices specifically stating that the sale and use of transmitters designed to prevent, jam or interfere with the operation of cellular and personal communications service (PCS) telephones is unlawful. Operation of a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-430A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-430A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-430A1.txt
  • Order, FCC 98-338, 13 FCC Rcd 24687 (1999). Id. at � 33. We currently do not allow TCBs to certify equipment requiring measurements of the specific absorption rate (SAR) of RF radiation by the body. No change in that policy is proposed. Marketing as defined by the Commission's rules includes selling, offering for sale, and advertising. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(e)(4). See 5 U.S.C. � 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. � 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA). See 5 U.S.C. � 603(a). See id. 5 U.S.C.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-290A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-290A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-290A1.txt
  • limits for short duration emissions. See Report and Order in GEN Docket 89-116, 89-117 and 89-118, 8 FCC Rcd 4236 (1993). A new version, ANSI C63.4-2000, is now available. See 47 C.F.R. � 15.301, et seq. See 47 C.F.R. � 15.201(b). See April 16, 2001 letter from Phillip Inglis to the Office of Engineering and Technology. See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 2.907 and 2.1033. See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.902 and 2.955. See 47 C.F.R. � 15.21. See 47 C.F.R. � 15.105. See May 24, 2001 letter from Intel Corporation on behalf of ITI to the Office of Engineering and Technology. See 47 C.F.R. � 95.401(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 95.627. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1055(a). The type-acceptance procedure was merged with
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-74A1.txt
  • 11, 2000, confirmed continuing operation of both the unlicensed FM station on 102.1 MHz from the Shady Oaks Plaza warehouse and the unlicensed STL on 950.0925 MHz from Mr. Brewer's Liberty Avenue residence. In addition to operating pirate FM and STL facilities, Mr. Brewer also has engaged in marketing unauthorized FM broadcast transmitting equipment, in apparent willful violation of Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 15.201(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803(a)(1) and 15.201(b). Thus, in early 1997, it came to the Commission's attention that Mr. Brewer, through his business, L.D. Brewer 2-Way Radio, was marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices. As a result, on July 18, 1997, the Commission staff directed a warning letter to Mr. Brewer to refrain from such activities.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-211A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-211A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-211A1.txt
  • of the Communications Act states that, ``No person shall manufacture, import, sell, offer for sale, or ship devices...which fail to comply with the regulations promulgated pursuant to this section.'' See 47 U.S.C. � 302(b). See 47 C.F.R. �� 15.109 and 15.35(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 15.35(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 15.5. See 47 C.F.R. � 15.15(a). See 47 C.F.R. � 2.803 for a description of the marketing restrictions for devices subject to Commission authorization. Equipment manufactured in this country solely for export is exempt from compliance with the requirements promulgated under Section 302 of the Communications Act. See 47 U.S.C. � 302(c). See 47 C.F.R. � 15.5. The certification procedure requires filing an application with and having it approved by either
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-29A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-29A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-29A1.txt
  • qualifications to be a Commission licensee. In addition to assessing a forfeiture, the Commission also revoked Mr. Brewer's Amateur Radio and General Mobile Radio Service licenses. The investigation revealed that Mr. Brewer had been broadcasting without a license in violation of 47 U.S.C. �301 and was marketing and selling unauthorized FM broadcast transmitting equipment in violation of 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803(a)(1) and 15.201(b). Mr. Brewer did not appeal the Revocation Order, and it became final on August 6, 2001. Discussion. 6. We find that the arguments raised on review are meritless. First, Mr. Brewer provides no evidence that the Commission discriminated against him, or that it gave either the STA request or the application unfair treatment by favoring corporations rather than
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-58A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-58A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-58A1.txt
  • do. The Commission now has before it an application for review of the staff's affirmation of that grant, filed by TransIntel. We are affirming the staff's denial of TransIntel's Petition for Reconsideration. BACKGROUND The Commission's rules include equipment authorization procedures to ensure that devices that are capable of emitting radiofrequency energy comply with the applicable rules and technical standards. Section 2.803 of the rules prohibits the marketing or importation of any radiofrequency device until the applicable equipment authorization procedures have been satisfied. Highway's Traveler's Advisory transmitter is subject to the equipment authorization procedure, which requires that the device receive a grant of Certification from the Commission. An equipment authorization issued by the Commission may not be transferred to another person or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-149A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-149A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-149A1.txt
  • See 47 C.F.R. � 15.19(b)(3). See 47 C.F.R. �� 15.19(b)(4) and 2.925(d)(2). See 47 C.F.R. � 2.925(e). See Notice at p. 18216. See CEA comments at 5, Cisco comments at 12 and Motorola comments at 3. See CEA comments at 5 and Motorola comments at 3. See Cisco comments at 12. See 47 C.F.R. � 15.201(b). See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 2.907 and 2.1033. See Notice at p. 18216. The proposed frequency cutoff of 490 kHz was selected to avoid possible interference to the marine distress band at 495-505 kHz, and the AM broadcast band at 535-1705 kHz. Id. See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.902 and 2.955. See Notice at p. 18216. See AdvaMed comments at 2, Cisco comments at 12, ITI
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A3.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A3.txt
  • arrangement. (iii) In the L-band, MSS ATC is limited to those frequency assignments available for MSS use in accordance with the Mexico City Memorandum of Understanding, its successor agreements or the result of other organized efforts of international coordination. (c) Equipment certification. Each ATC MET utilized for operation under this part and each transmitter marketed, as set forth in Sec. 2.803 of this chapter, must be of a type that has been authorized by the Commission under its certification procedure for use under this part. Any manufacturer of radio transmitting equipment to be used in these services may request equipment authorization following the procedures set forth in subpart J of part 2 of this chapter. Equipment authorization for an individual transmitter
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A3_Erratum.doc
  • arrangement. (iii) In the L-band, MSS ATC is limited to those frequency assignments available for MSS use in accordance with the Mexico City Memorandum of Understanding, its successor agreements or the result of other organized efforts of international coordination. (c) Equipment certification. Each ATC MET utilized for operation under this part and each transmitter marketed, as set forth in Sec. 2.803 of this chapter, must be of a type that has been authorized by the Commission under its certification procedure for use under this part. Any manufacturer of radio transmitting equipment to be used in these services may request equipment authorization following the procedures set forth in subpart J of part 2 of this chapter. Equipment authorization for an individual transmitter
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-162A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-162A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-162A1.txt
  • arrangement. (iii) In the L-band, MSS ATC is limited to those frequency assignments available for MSS use in accordance with the Mexico City Memorandum of Understanding, its successor agreements or the result of other organized efforts of international coordination. (c) Equipment certification. Each ATC MET utilized for operation under this part and each transmitter marketed, as set forth in Sec. 2.803 of this chapter, must be of a type that has been authorized by the Commission under its certification procedure for use under this part. Any manufacturer of radio transmitting equipment to be used in these services may request equipment authorization following the procedures set forth in subpart J of part 2 of this chapter. Equipment authorization for an individual transmitter
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-283A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-283A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-283A1.txt
  • radio-emitting devices that do not meet the standards it prescribes for prevention of interference from being placed on the market in the United States. Importation and Marketing Rules In exercise of its authority under Section 302, the Commission has adopted rules pertaining to importation and marketing of radio-frequency devices. The regulations governing importation and marketing are set forth in Sections 2.803 and 2.1204 of the Commission's rules, which apply by their terms to radio emitters and transmitters of every kind, including GMPCS transceivers. Subsection 2.803(a) states, in essence, that no one may ``sell or lease, or offer for sale or lease ... or import, ship, or distribute for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease'' any
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-322A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-322A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-322A1.txt
  • balance our goals for ensuring compliance with our rules and burdens on manufacturers. As described above, device with cognitive capabilities may be subject to new forms of abuse to which other devices are not susceptible. Of course, devices with cognitive capabilities would generally require certification by the Commission, and thus are subject to the marketing and use restrictions of Section 2.803. We seek comment on how we can enable the use of cognitive radio technologies, but prevent abuses such as those described above. Are there features that could be incorporated into devices to help detect attempts to physically tamper with spectrum sensing and geo-location technologies built into devices? Could devices be designed to detect alterations to control software or databases and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-33A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-33A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-33A1.txt
  • attached to the GPR that the PRF of the GPR has been less than 100 kHz. R&O, supra, at para. 323. 47 C.F.R. � 15.35(b). R&O, supra, at para. 277. NTIA also issued authorizations permitting a GPRs to be operated by a few Federal Government agencies, e.g., by the U.S. Department of Justice. 47 U.S.C. � 302; 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 15.1. The factional bandwidth is the UWB bandwidth, i.e., the -10 dB bandwidth, divided by the center frequency. See 47 C.F.R. � 15.503(c). R&O, supra, at para. 32. MSSI Petition for Reconsideration at pg. 10-11. Id. at pg. 12-13. This is the type of modulation employed by the XSI equipment. Id. at pg. 15-16. MSSI comments at pg. 4. SARA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-24A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-24A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-24A1.txt
  • 47 C.F.R. � 2.939. 47 C.F.R. � 95.631. See 47 C.F.R. � 95.1. 47 C.F.R. � 95.631(a). Under Section 95.631(a), non-voice emissions from GMRS transmitters are limited to selective calling or tone-operated squelch tones to establish or continue voice communications. See also 47 C.F.R. � 95.181(f), (g). 47 C.F.R. � 95.631(f). 47 C.F.R. � 95.603(a). See also 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(a)(1). OET originally granted J Communications' Application for Equipment Authorization (FCC Form 731) for its GMRS radios on May 2, 2001. OET reissued the certification on March 20, 2002, after testing the device in accordance with its post-grant sampling program. Emissions are designated by an alphanumeric code according to their classification and necessary bandwidth. The first symbol designates the type of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-259A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-259A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-259A1.txt
  • Released: November 1, 2004 By the Commission: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find ACR Electronics, Inc. (``ACR'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seventy five thousand dollars ($75,000) for marketing unauthorized equipment in willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934 as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). background In February 2004, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') received a complaint alleging that ACR was marketing through outdoor and sporting publications and websites a new personal location beacon (``PLB''), 406 GPS PLB-200 (``PLB-200''), under the names ``TerraFix'' for land use, ``AquaFix'' for marine use, and ``AeroFix'' for aviation use, which had not been authorized by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-262A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-262A1.txt
  • 2. Devices subject to DoC include VCRs, personal computers and peripherals, and non-broadcast radio receivers that tune in the range of 30-960 MHz. See Second Report and Order at p. 14756. Certification requires the manufacturer to have the equipment tested for compliance, then file an application and wait for approval before the equipment can be marketed. See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803, 2.907 and 2.1033. Verification requires the manufacturer to have the equipment tested and to retain certain information on file. No application filing is required for verification and the equipment may be sold as soon as it is found to comply. See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.902 and 2.955. See Second Report and Order at p. 14756. See ITI petition at 3.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-272A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-272A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-272A1.txt
  • 18, 2004 Released: November 22, 2004 By the Commission: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Pilot Travel Centers, L.L.C. (``Pilot'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of one hundred twenty-five thousand dollars ($125,000) for willful and repeated violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). Specifically, we find Pilot apparently liable for offering for sale radio frequency devices without the required Commission equipment authorization. background Section 302 of the Act authorizes the Commission to make reasonable regulations, consistent with the public interest, governing the interference potential of equipment that emits radio frequency energy, and prohibits, inter alia, the offering for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-272A1_Erratum.doc
  • 18, 2004 Released: November 22, 2004 By the Commission: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Pilot Travel Centers, L.L.C. (``Pilot'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of one hundred twenty-five thousand dollars ($125,000) for willful and repeated violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). Specifically, we find Pilot apparently liable for offering for sale radio frequency devices without the required Commission equipment authorization. background Section 302 of the Act authorizes the Commission to make reasonable regulations, consistent with the public interest, governing the interference potential of equipment that emits radio frequency energy, and prohibits, inter alia, the offering for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-282A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-282A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-282A1.txt
  • By the Commission: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Commission and Samson Technologies, Inc. (``Samson''). The Consent Decree terminates the forfeiture proceeding initiated by the Commission against Samson for its apparent failure to comply with the requirements set forth in Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The Commission and Samson have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve this matter and terminate the forfeiture proceeding. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. Based on the record before us, we conclude that no substantial or material questions of fact exist with respect to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-39A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-39A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-39A1.txt
  • February 25, 2004 Released: March 3, 2004 By the Commission: I. INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Samson Technologies, Inc. (``Samson'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of thirty-five thousand dollars ($35,000) for willful and repeated apparent violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted apparent violations involve Samson's importing and marketing of five models of multi-track music recording devices that do not comply with the radiated emission limits set forth in Part 15 of the Rules. BACKGROUND Zoom Corporation (``Zoom''), a Japanese company, manufactured the recording equipment involved in this case and Samson imported that equipment and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-39A1_Erratum.doc
  • February 25, 2004 Released: March 3, 2004 By the Commission: I. INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Samson Technologies, Inc. (``Samson'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of thirty-five thousand dollars ($35,000) for willful and repeated apparent violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted apparent violations involve Samson's importing and marketing of five models of multi-track music recording devices that do not comply with the radiated emission limits set forth in Part 15 of the Rules. BACKGROUND Zoom Corporation (``Zoom''), a Japanese company, manufactured the recording equipment involved in this case and Samson imported that equipment and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-136A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-136A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-136A1.txt
  • Request for Waiver by GPS Networking, Inc. Specifically, GPS Networking requests that the Commission amend Section 15.211 of its regulations regarding tunnel radio systems, 47 C.F.R. � 15.211, or other regulations as deemed necessary, to permit GPS Networking to market a ``re-radiation'' kit for Global Positioning Satellite (GPS) signals. It also requests that the Commission grant a waiver of Section 2.803 of its marketing regulations, 47 C.F.R. � 2.803, to permit GPS Networking to market this equipment prior to obtaining a grant of equipment authorization while the rulemaking petition is being addressed. A Public Notice soliciting comments on the petition was issued on June 25, 2004. The U.S. GPS Industry Council (USGPSIC) and the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-57A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-57A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-57A1.txt
  • FCC Rcd 24442, 24450 (2000). See 47 C.F.R. � 15.407(h). See In the Matter of Pilot Travel Centers, L.L.C., Knoxville, Tennessee, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 19 FCC Rcd 23113, 23114 (2004). In this forfeiture proceeding, the Commission issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's rules for marketing unapproved radio transmitters. The transmitters in question were marketed as amateur equipment, which is normally exempt from a certification requirement. However, the transmitters had the capability of being easily altered to operate on frequency bands in the Citizen's Band (CB) Radio Service, so the Commission held that they met the definition of a CB
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-13A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-13A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-13A1.txt
  • 2006 Released: February 16, 2006 By the Commission: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') and Order, we find that Behringer USA, Inc. (``Behringer'') marketed 50 models of unauthorized radio frequency devices specifically, digital audio music devices, in apparent willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). Significantly, we find that Behringer continued to import and market substantial numbers of these unauthorized devices for more than a year after the Enforcement Bureau initiated an inquiry into Behringer's compliance with the Commission's equipment authorization requirements. Based on the facts and circumstances before us, including the egregious nature of Behringer's continued non-compliance, we conclude
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-30A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-30A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-30A1.txt
  • this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we propose a forfeiture amount of seventy five thousand dollars ($75,000) against San Jose Navigation, Inc. (``San Jose'') for its marketing of intentional radiating equipment, Global Positioning Satellite (``GPS'') signal re-radiator kits, in apparent willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and Sections 2.803 and 15.205 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The GPS re-radiator kits are not Commission authorized and are not eligible for such authorization, because they operate in restricted frequency bands allocated for authorized safety-of-life operations. II. BACKGROUND Section 302 of the Act authorizes the Commission to make reasonable regulations, consistent with the public interest, governing the interference potential of equipment that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-37A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-37A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-37A1.txt
  • NAL/Acct. No. 200532100004 Adopted: March 21, 2006 Released: March 23, 2006 By the Commission: introduction By this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we find that ACR Electronics, Inc. (``ACR'') marketed intentional radiating equipment prior to obtaining Commission certification in willful and repeated violation of the equipment marketing requirements of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). For these violations, we impose a monetary forfeiture in the amount of sixty five thousand dollars ($65,000). background Section 302(b) of the Act provides that ``[n]o person shall manufacture, import, sell, offer for sale, or ship devices of home electronic equipment and systems, or use devices, which fail to comply with regulations promulgated pursuant to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-53A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-53A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-53A1.txt
  • 1, 2006 Released: May 11, 2006 By the Commission: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Commission and Pilot Travel Centers LLC (``Pilot''). The Consent Decree terminates the forfeiture proceeding initiated by the Commission against Pilot for its apparent violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by offering for sale radio frequency devices without the required Commission equipment authorization. The Commission and Pilot have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve this matter and terminate the forfeiture proceeding. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-100A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-100A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-100A1.txt
  • 0014638803 FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: May 23, 2007 Released: June 1, 2007 By the Commission: I. INTRODUCTION By this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we find that Behringer USA, Inc. (``Behringer'') marketed 50 models of unauthorized radio frequency equipment, specifically digital audio music devices, in willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). We further find that Behringer's violations warrant, and the record before us supports, the imposition of a forfeiture in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000). II. BACKGROUND Section 302(b) of the Act provides that ``[n]o person shall manufacture, import, sell, offer for sale, or ship devices of home electronic equipment and systems, or use
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-209A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-209A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-209A1.txt
  • Released: December 3, 2007 By the Commission: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Austin Hughes Solutions, Inc. (``Austin Hughes'') apparently liable for a forfeiture for marketing nine models of non-verified Class A digital devices in apparent willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). Based on the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that Austin Hughes is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of sixty-three thousand dollars ($63,000). background Section 302 of the Act authorizes the Commission to make reasonable regulations, consistent with the public interest, governing the interference potential of equipment that emits radio frequency
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-3A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-3A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-3A1.txt
  • radiating equipment, specifically Global Positioning Satellite (``GPS'') signal re-radiator kits, which are not authorized and not eligible for authorization by the Commission because the devices operate in restricted frequency bands. We further find that, in marketing these GPS signal re-radiator kits, San Jose willfully and repeatedly violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). For San Jose's violations, we impose a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000). II. BACKGROUND Section 302(b) of the Act provides that ``[n]o person shall manufacture, import, sell, offer for sale, or ship devices of home electronic equipment and systems, or use devices, which fail to comply with regulations
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-45A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-45A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-45A1.txt
  • 0012065009 Adopted: March 28, 2007 Released: April 2, 2007 By the Commission: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Hawking Technologies, Inc. (``Hawking'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.204(d) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The apparent violations involve marketing external radio frequency power amplifiers in a manner that was inconsistent with the terms of Hawking's equipment authorization and the requirements of Section 15.204(d) of the Rules. background Section 302 of the Act authorizes the Commission to make reasonable regulations, consistent with the public interest, governing the interference
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-49A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-49A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-49A1.txt
  • LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE Adopted: March 30, 2007 Released: March 30, 2007 By the Commission: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Ramko Distributors, Inc. (``Ramko'') apparently liable for marketing 17 models of non-certified radio transceivers, in apparent willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The subject devices are neither Commission authorized, nor eligible for such authorization. Based on the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that Ramko is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). background Section 302 of the Act authorizes the Commission to make reasonable regulations, consistent with
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-66A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-66A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-66A1.txt
  • to 35 MHz. See 47 C.F.R. �� 97.315 and 97.317. See In the Matter of Pilot Travel Centers, L.L.C., Knoxville, Tennessee, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 19 FCC Rcd 23113, 23114 (2004). In this forfeiture proceeding, the Commission issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's rules for marketing unapproved radio transmitters. The transmitters in question were marketed as amateur equipment, which is normally exempt from a certification requirement. However, the transmitters had the capability of being easily altered to operate on frequency bands in the Citizen's Band (CB) Radio Service, so the Commission held that they met the definition of a CB
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-254A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-254A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-254A1.txt
  • and Order at �� 2, 20-45, and 210-11. Id. at �240. An individual, site-specific license must be obtained for any ATC base station that presents an aviation-hazard issue or for which an Environmental Assessment must be prepared. Id. at �239; also see 47 CFR �� 1.1307, 17.4, and 17.7. 47 CFR � 25.149(c)(1) and (2). Also see 47 CFR �� 2.803, 2.901 et seq., and 2.1204. These gating criteria are set forth in 47 CFR � 25.149. ATC Report and Order at �72. 47 CFR � 25.149(b)(1). 47 CFR � 25.149(b)(2). 47 CFR � 25.149(b)(3). The Commission explained that ATC authority permits licensees to deploy MSS ATC subject to several conditions designed in part to ensure the allocation remains first and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-106A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-106A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-106A1.txt
  • Memorandum Opinion and Order issued by the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') on April 20, 2007. In that Memorandum Opinion and Order, the Bureau denied Vitec's Petition for Reconsideration of a monetary forfeiture in the amount of eleven thousand two hundred dollars ($11,200) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted violations involve Vitec's marketing of unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. II. BACKGROUND In May 2005, the Bureau received a complaint alleging that Clear-Com Communication Systems was marketing unapproved radiofrequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a) of the Rules. Specifically, the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-107A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-107A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-107A1.txt
  • this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Commission and San Jose Technology, Inc. (formerly known as San Jose Navigation, Inc.) (collectively ``San Jose''). The Consent Decree terminates the Commission's enforcement proceeding regarding San Jose's compliance with the equipment requirements set forth in Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205 of the Commission's Rules. The Commission and San Jose have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve this matter and terminate the enforcement proceeding. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. Based on the available facts related to this matter, we conclude that there are no substantial or material
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-25A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-25A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-25A1.txt
  • ) ) FRN # 0012065009 FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: March 27, 2009 Released: March 31, 2009 By the Commission: In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) to Hawking Technologies, Inc. (``Hawking'') for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.204(d) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The apparent violations involve marketing external radio frequency power amplifiers in a manner that was inconsistent with the terms of Hawking's equipment authorization and the requirements of Section 15.204(d) of the Rules. 2. On April 2, 2007, the Commission issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of $50,000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-16A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-16A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-16A1.txt
  • 08-167 (filed Mar. 9, 2009) (``APCO et al. Mar. 9 Ex Parte'') at 1-2 & n.4; see also APCO et al. Apr. 7 Ex Parte at 4 (recommending the prohibition apply to LPAS devices that operate in the 700 MHz Band and are intended for domestic use). 47 U.S.C. � 302a(a). Id. � 302a(b). Id.; see also 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(a) (stating that no person shall sell or lease, or offer for sale or lease (including advertising for sale or lease), or import, ship, or distribute for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease, any radio frequency device unless such device has been authorized by the Commission in accordance with the Commission's rules). See Alcatel-Lucent, et
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-197A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-197A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-197A1.txt
  • different situations. To remedy this, we propose modifications of our rules and procedures that will bring clarity to the market trial process and encourage more robust market trial activities by a greater number of innovators. As background, Commission rules generally prohibit devices from being marketed or operated prior to receiving a grant of equipment authorization. However, exceptions do exist. Section 2.803 of our rules allows for conditional sales, advertising and display, and outright sales to certain businesses of equipment not yet certified so long as proper notice is provided to the prospective buyer. That rule section also provides for a manufacturer to operate its product for demonstration or evaluation purposes under the authority of a local FCC-licensed service provider. Additionally, Section
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-133A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-133A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-133A1.txt
  • devices be used only by and for handicapped persons. In 2009, the Commission issued a citation to ProLingo, a provider of simultaneous interpretation equipment and services, for marketing, as a component of its simultaneous language interpretation systems, transmitters operating on frequencies in the 72-76 MHz bands. ProLingo was found to have violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act and Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 15.237 of the Commission's rules. Williams Sound appears to seek approval by declaratory ruling to conduct substantially the same activity that we found to violate our rules. Furthermore, we reject Williams Sound's assertion that the inability to understand a foreign language can be considered a handicap, which thereby justifies permitting auditory assistance devices that operate in the 72-76 MHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-79A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-79A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-79A1.txt
  • the Commission waived Section 15.253(a) of the rules which restricts operation in the 76-77 GHz band to vehicular radar systems, and Section 15.253(b)(1) which requires reduced operating power when a radar is not in motion. The Era petition seeks to create permanent rules somewhat analogous to what was granted in the waiver. Era Systems Corporation Request for Waiver of Sections 2.803, 15.201 and 15.253 of the Commission's Rules, Order, ET Docket No. 09-55, 24 FCC Rcd 12179 (OET, 2009). See TMC petition at page 2. See TMC petition at page 8. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1310 and OET Bulletin Number 65, ``Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields,'' (August 1997 Edition 97-01). Currently, Section 15.253(f) incorporates
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-7A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-7A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-7A1.txt
  • manufacturers already are prohibited from marketing non-compliant equipment. Specifically, section 11.34 of the Commission's rules requires that the data submitted for certification of encoders and decoders ``show the capability of the equipment to meet the requirements of [Part 11].'' This data necessarily includes compliance with the ECIG Implementation Guide, conformance with which we are mandating in section 11.56. Further, section 2.803 generally prohibits the marketing of equipment subject to certification that has not obtained such certification. We also decline to make explicit in the rules that EAS Participants are not responsible for ensuring compliance with the ECIG Implementation Guide. First, all of the obligations in Part 11 are directed at EAS Participants. Second, because EAS equipment manufacturers are prohibited from marketing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-37A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-37A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-37A1.txt
  • �2.907. See Arrangements, Section IV, p. 3. See 47 C.F. R. Part 2., subpart J. See, e.g., U.S. LEO Services, 11 FCC Rcd 20474 (1996). See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1307, 25.135(b) and (c), 25.136(a) and (b), 25.202(a)(3), 25.202(a)(4), 25.202(d), 25.202(f), and 25.213(a)(1) and (b). See Petition for Equipment Certification filed May, 12 1998. [File No. 31010/EQU 4-3-1] See 47 C.F.R. �2.803. For example, we understand that GMPCS equipment certified in Europe would bear the "Communit� Europ�en" or "CE" mark on the terminal. See 47 C.F.R. �2.1204(a). 47 U.S.C. � 302(a). See 47 C.F.R. �� 25.115(d), 25.135, 25.136, and 25.213. U.S. Leo Services, Inc., supra; Orbital Communications Corp., 10 FCC Rcd 6572 (1995); American Mobile Satellite Corp., 1995 WL 109123 (F.C.C.). Amendment
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2000/fcc00430.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2000/fcc00430.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2000/fcc00430.txt
  • Order, FCC 98-338, 13 FCC Rcd 24687 (1999). Id. at � 33. We currently do not allow TCBs to certify equipment requiring measurements of the specific absorption rate (SAR) of RF radiation by the body. No change in that policy is proposed. Marketing as defined by the Commission's rules includes selling, offering for sale, and advertising. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(e)(4). See 5 U.S.C. � 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. � 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA). See 5 U.S.C. � 603(a). See id. 5 U.S.C.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/News_Releases/DOC-255184A1.html
  • (D.C. Circ 1974) __________________________________________________________________ FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE December 13, 2004 NEWS MEDIA CONTACT: Janice Wise at (202) 418-7450 [5]Janice.Wise@FCC.GOV FCC AND SAMSON TECHNOLOGIES ENTER INTO $26,500 CONSENT DECREE CONCERNING EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS Washington, D.C. - The Federal Communications Commission today entered into a Consent Decree with Samson Technologies, Inc. (Samson) that resolves possible violations of 47 U.S.C. 302a(b) and 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a) concerning Samson's importation and marketing of certain models of multi-track music recording devices. As part of the Consent Decree, Samson will make a $26,500 voluntary payment to the U.S. Treasury and will implement a Compliance Plan aimed at preventing future violations of the Commission's equipment regulations. Action by the Commission on December 8, 2004, by Order [6](FCC 04-282) Chairman Powell,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/News_Releases/DOC-310226A1.html
  • Enforcement Bureau has issued 20 enforcement actions against online retailers in 12 states for illegally marketing more than 200 uniquely-described models of cell phone jammers, GPS jammers, Wi-Fi jammers, and similar signal jamming devices. These devices have the capacity to prevent, block, or otherwise interfere with authorized radio communications in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act and sections 2.803 and 15.201(b) of the Commission's rules. The Enforcement Bureau's actions are intended to warn retailers and potential purchasers that marketing, selling, or using signal jamming devices in the U.S. is illegal and that the FCC will vigorously prosecute these violations. Enforcement Bureau Chief Michele Ellison said, "Our actions should send a strong message to retailers of signal jamming devices that
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/News_Releases/brewer.html
  • BUREAU FINES FLORIDA MAN $10,000 FOR MARKETING UNAUTHORIZED RADIO EQUIPMENT WASHINGTON, D.C. - Today, the Enforcement Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission issued a Forfeiture Order imposing a $10,000 forfeiture against Leslie D. Brewer and his company, Leslie D. Brewer's 2-Way Radio. The fine was imposed for the sale of an unauthorized FM radio transmitter in willful violation of Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 15.201(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a)(1), and 15.201(b). Mr. Brewer sold a fully assembled, 20-watt transmitter capable of operating in the FM frequency band to an undercover Commission agent. The transmitter was not authorized by the Commission, and had no FCC identifier number affixed to it. Mr. Brewer was previously involved in the operation of an unauthorized
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011489.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011489.html
  • (b) To determine whether Leslie D. Brewer willfully and/or repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, by operating an unlicensed Studio-to-Transmitter Link in 1999 and/or 2000, and, if so, the effect thereof on his basic qualifications to be and remain a Commission licensee. (c) To determine whether Leslie D. Brewer willfully and/or repeatedly violated Sections 2.803(a)(1) and/or 15.201(b) of the Commission's rules by marketing and/or selling an unauthorized radio frequency device or devices, and, if so, the effect thereof on his basic qualifications to be and remain a Commission licensee. (d) To determine whether, in light of the evidence adduced pursuant to the foregoing issues, Leslie D. Brewer is qualified to be and remain a Commission
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01074.html
  • 2000, confirmed continuing operation of both the unlicensed FM station on 102.1 MHz from the Shady Oaks Plaza warehouse and the unlicensed STL on 950.0925 MHz from Mr. Brewer's Liberty Avenue residence. 10. In addition to operating pirate FM and STL facilities, Mr. Brewer also has engaged in marketing unauthorized FM broadcast transmitting equipment, in apparent willful violation of Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 15.201(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a)(1) and 15.201(b).9 Thus, in early 1997, it came to the Commission's attention that Mr. Brewer, through his business, L.D. Brewer 2-Way Radio, was marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices. As a result, on July 18, 1997, the Commission staff directed a warning letter to Mr. Brewer to refrain from such activities. Mr.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-1127A1.html
  • 2002 Released: May 14, 2002 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Memorandum Opinion and Order (``Order''), we cancel a seven thousand dollar ($7,000) Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'')1 that the Miami Resident Agent Office issued to Lightning Electronics, Inc. (``Lightning''), for apparently violating Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'')2 and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').3 The alleged violations involve Lightning's marketing of non-compliant high-power cordless telephones. 2. The Commission's Miami, Florida, Resident Agent Office issued the NAL to Lightning on October 29, 2001. Lightning did not file a response to the NAL. On February 21, 2002, the Chief, Enforcement Bureau, issued a Forfeiture Order 4 affirming the forfeiture proposed by
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-1141A1.html
  • 15, 2002 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seventeen thousand dollars ($17,000) to CTI of Miami, Inc. (``CTI''), for willful violation of Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 and repeated and willful violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').2 The noted violations involve CTI's marketing of non-compliant high-power cordless telephones and CTI's operation of a non-compliant high-power cordless telephone without authorization from the Commission. 2. On January 25, 2002, the Commission's Miami, Florida, Resident Agent Office issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture in the amount of $17,000 to CTI for the noted
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-2474A1.html
  • FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: September 30, 2002 Released: October 2, 2002 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. Introduction 1. In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) against Lightning Electronics, Inc. (``Lightning''), for willful and repeated violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'')1 and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').2 The noted violations involve Lightning's marketing of unapproved long-range cordless telephones. 2. On May 21, 2002, the District Director of the Enforcement Bureau's (``Bureau'') Tampa, Florida, Office (``Tampa Office'') released a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') against Lightning in the amount of $7,000.3 Lightning filed a response to the NAL dated June 11,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-373A1.html
  • Florida ) FRN 0006-1134-84 FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: February 15, 2002 Released: February 20, 2002 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Electronics Unlimited for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').2 The noted violations involve Electronic Unlimited's marketing of a non-compliant high-power cordless telephone (``Alcon, AT526''). 2. On October 23, 2001, the Commission's Miami, Florida Resident Agent Office (``Miami Office'') issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Electronics Unlimited for the noted violations.3 Electronics Unlimited has
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-383A1.html
  • FRN 0006-2915-95 FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: February 19, 2002 Released: February 21, 2002 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Lightning Electronics, Inc. (``Lightning''), for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'')1 and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').2 The noted violations involve Lightning's marketing of non-compliant high- power cordless telephones. 2. On October 29, 2001, the Commission's Miami, Florida, Resident Agent Office issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture in the amount of $7,000 to Lightning for the noted violations.3 Lightning has not filed a response. Based on the information before us,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-453A1.html
  • 0006-3343-12 ) FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: February 26, 2002 Released: March 1, 2002 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000), to New Image Electronics (``NIE''), for willful violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules").2 The noted violation involves NIE's marketing of non-compliant long-range cordless telephones. 2. On October 29, 2001, the District Director of the Commission's Tampa, Florida Field Office issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"),3 on behalf of the Commission's Miami, Florida Resident Agent Office ("Miami Office"), in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000).
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-3107A1.html
  • 2003 Released: October 10, 2003 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Memorandum Opinion and Order (``Order''), we deny the request filed by Lightning Electronics, Inc. (``Lightning''), for reconsideration of the Forfeiture Order issued to Lightning on October 2, 2002, for willful and repeated violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'')1 and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').2 The noted violations involve Lightning's marketing of unapproved long-range cordless telephones. 2. On May 21, 2002, the District Director of the Enforcement Bureau's (``Bureau'') Tampa, Florida, Office (``Tampa Office'') released a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') against Lightning in the amount of $7,000.3 Lightning filed its response to the NAL dated June 11,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-3544A1.html
  • of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order (``NAL''), we find Johannus Orgelbouw b.v. (``Johannus'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for importing and marketing radio frequency devices which do not comply with the Commission's technical standards in repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').2 The noted violations involve Johannus's importing and marketing digital electronic organs that do not comply with the technical requirements set forth in Part 15 of the Rules. In addition, we order Johannus, pursuant to Section 2.956(a)(1) of the Rules,3 to submit to the Enforcement Bureau a copy of the verification records for each model of
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-03-4118A1.html
  • January 2, 2004 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Datel Design and Development, Inc. (``Datel'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of ten thousand dollars ($10,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').2 The noted violations involve Datel's importing and marketing of approximately 15,000 thousand units of the Datel Talknet USB Headset, Model Number DUS0049, that do not comply with the radiated emission limits set forth in Part 15 of the Rules. II. BACKGROUND 2. The Talknet USB Headsets involved in this case were manufactured outside the United
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-1013A1.html
  • and distributed in the United States by Vector Products, Inc. d/b/a Vector Manufacturing, Ltd. (``Vector'') were not in compliance with the technical standards of Part 15 of the Commission's Rules.1 The Public Notice advised retailers that continued marketing of the battery chargers would constitute a violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (``Act'')2 and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').3 On October 23, 2003, Vector filed a petition for reconsideration of that Public Notice.4 2. On April 2, 2004, Vector filed a motion to withdraw the petition for reconsideration.5 Vector notes that it has entered into a Consent Decree with the Enforcement Bureau and the Office of Engineering and Technology which terminates the Enforcement Bureau's
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-1092A1.html
  • FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: April 23, 2004 Released: April 27, 2004 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of five thousand, six hundred dollars ($5,600) to Johannus Orgelbouw b.v. (``Johannus''), for repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').2 The noted violations involve Johannus's importing and marketing digital electronic organs that do not comply with the technical requirements set forth in Part 15 of the Rules. 2. On November 6, 2003, the Enforcement Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') 3 in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Johannus.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-1377A1.html
  • By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau and Schumacher Electric Corporation (``Schumacher''). The Consent Decree terminates the forfeiture proceeding initiated by the Enforcement Bureau against Schumacher for its apparent failure to comply with the equipment requirements set forth in Section 302(b) of the Act1 and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').2 2. The Enforcement Bureau and Schumacher have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve this matter and terminate the forfeiture proceeding. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. Based on the record before us, we conclude that no substantial or material questions of fact exist
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-1704A1.html
  • by attorney at the prehearing conference held on April 7, 2004. 8 See 47 C.F.R. 95.1. 9 47 C.F.R. 95.631(a). That provision limits non-voice emissions from GMRS transmitters to selective calling or tone- operated squelch tones to establish or continue voice communications. See also 47 C.F.R. 95.181(f), (g). 10 47 C.F.R. 95.631(f). 11 47 C.F.R. 95.603(a). See also 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a)(1). 12 OET originally granted J Communications' Application for Equipment Authorization (FCC Form 731) for its GMRS radios on May 2, 2001. OET reissued the certification on March 20, 2002, after testing the device in accordance with its post-grant sampling program. 13 Emissions are designated by an alphanumeric code according to their classification and necessary bandwidth. The first symbol designates the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-2530A1.html
  • I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find IKUSI-Angel Iglesias, S.A. (``IKUSI'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for importing and marketing in the United States non-compliant equipment in willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b)1 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803(a)(1)2 and 15.231(a)3 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). II. BACKGROUND 2. The Office of Engineering and Technology referred to the Enforcement Bureau a complaint alleging that IKUSI's Remote Crane Transmitter (``RCT Model TM60''),4 a radio frequency device designed for the remote control of cranes and hoists, fails to comply with Section 15.231(a) of the Rules, which requires a manually operated transmitter
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-3189A1.html
  • VIA Technologies, Inc. (``VIA'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000) for importing and marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices, specifically, its model EPIA-M and EPIA-CL computer central processing unit (``CPU'') boards, in willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').2 II. BACKGROUND 2. The FCC's Office of Engineering and Technology referred to the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Enforcement Bureau a complaint alleging that VIA was importing and marketing in the U.S. CPU boards which include a setup option to disable the board's spread spectrum clocking (``SSC'') function. The complainant alleged that VIA was importing
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-3947A1.html
  • issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000) against VIA Technologies, Inc. (``VIA'') for importing and marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices, specifically, its model EPIA-M and EPIA-CL computer central processing unit (``CPU'') boards, in willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').2 2. On October 6, 2004, the Spectrum Enforcement Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of $14,000 to VIA.3 VIA has not filed a response to the NAL. Based on the information before us, we affirm this forfeiture. 3. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT, pursuant to Section 503(b) of
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-976A1.html
  • 2004 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Schumacher Electric Corporation (``Schumacher'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for marketing unauthorized equipment in willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').2 II. BACKGROUND 2. On November 5, 2003, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') received a complaint alleging that Schumacher was marketing a new line of SpeedCharge automobile battery chargers (``SpeedChargers'') at the ongoing Automobile Aftermarket Products Expo (``AAPEX'') in Las Vegas, Nevada.3 According to the complaint, Schumacher did not label the exhibited SpeedChargers under Section 15.19(a)(3) of
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/FCC-04-24A1.html
  • Secretary _________________________ 1 47 C.F.R. 2.939. 2 47 C.F.R. 95.631. 3 See 47 C.F.R. 95.1. 4 47 C.F.R. 95.631(a). Under Section 95.631(a), non-voice emissions from GMRS transmitters are limited to selective calling or tone-operated squelch tones to establish or continue voice communications. See also 47 C.F.R. 95.181(f), (g). 5 47 C.F.R. 95.631(f). 6 47 C.F.R. 95.603(a). See also 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a)(1). 7 OET originally granted J Communications' Application for Equipment Authorization (FCC Form 731) for its GMRS radios on May 2, 2001. OET reissued the certification on March 20, 2002, after testing the device in accordance with its post-grant sampling program. 8 Emissions are designated by an alphanumeric code according to their classification and necessary bandwidth. The first symbol designates the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/FCC-04-259A1.html
  • 1, 2004 By the Commission: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find ACR Electronics, Inc. (``ACR'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seventy five thousand dollars ($75,000) for marketing unauthorized equipment in willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934 as amended (``Act''),1 and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').2 II. BACKGROUND 2. In February 2004, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') received a complaint alleging that ACR was marketing through outdoor and sporting publications and websites a new personal location beacon (``PLB''), 406 GPS PLB-200 (``PLB-200''), under the names ``TerraFix'' for land use, ``AquaFix'' for marine use, and ``AeroFix'' for aviation use, which had not been
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/FCC-04-272A1.html
  • Released: November 22, 2004 By the Commission: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Pilot Travel Centers, L.L.C. (``Pilot'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of one hundred twenty-five thousand dollars ($125,000) for willful and repeated violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').2 Specifically, we find Pilot apparently liable for offering for sale radio frequency devices without the required Commission equipment authorization. II. BACKGROUND 2. Section 302 of the Act authorizes the Commission to make reasonable regulations, consistent with the public interest, governing the interference potential of equipment that emits radio frequency energy,3 and prohibits, inter alia, the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/FCC-04-282A1.html
  • the Commission: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Commission and Samson Technologies, Inc. (``Samson''). The Consent Decree terminates the forfeiture proceeding initiated by the Commission against Samson for its apparent failure to comply with the requirements set forth in Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').1 2. The Commission and Samson have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve this matter and terminate the forfeiture proceeding. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. Based on the record before us, we conclude that no substantial or material questions of fact exist with
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/FCC-04-39A1.html
  • 2004 Released: March 3, 2004 By the Commission: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Samson Technologies, Inc. (``Samson'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of thirty- five thousand dollars ($35,000) for willful and repeated apparent violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').2 The noted apparent violations involve Samson's importing and marketing of five models of multi-track music recording devices that do not comply with the radiated emission limits set forth in Part 15 of the Rules. II. BACKGROUND 2. Zoom Corporation (``Zoom''), a Japanese company, manufactured the recording equipment involved in this case and Samson imported that
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1029A1.html
  • Blvd. Bentonville, Arkansas 72716-0710 Re: File No. EB- 05-SE-050 Dear Ms. Nounou: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(5), for marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter dated February 24, 2005, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau initiated an investigation into whether Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (``Wal-Mart'') is marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1030A1.html
  • Road Winchester, Virginia 22602 Re: File No. EB- 05-SE-063 Dear Mr. Ryberg: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(5), for marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. It has come to our attention that GPS Outfitters, Inc. (``GPS Outfitters'') has been marketing the Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna in the United States. Specifically, on March 4, 2005, staff of the FCC
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1031A1.html
  • West Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15275 Re: File No. EB- 05-SE-062 Dear Mr. Colombo: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(5), for marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. It has come to our attention that Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc. (``Dick's'') has been marketing the GPS Outfitters Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna in the United States. Specifically, on March 4, 2005, staff of
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1033A1.html
  • of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406 Re: File No. EB- 05-SE-064 Dear Mr. Rubin: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(5), for marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. It has come to our attention that Fogdog, Inc. (``Fogdog'') has been marketing the GPS Outfitters Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna in the United States. Specifically, on February 14, 2005 and March 18, 2005,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1034A1.html
  • Way Canton, Massachusetts 02021 Re: File No. EB- 05-SE-065 Dear Mr. Stone: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(5), for marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. It has come to our attention that Tweeter Home Entertainment Group (``Tweeter'') has been marketing the GPS Outfitters Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna in the United States. Specifically, on March 7, 2005 and March
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1035A1.html
  • Avenue Englewood, Colorado 80110 Re: File No. EB- 05-SE-078 Dear Mr. Hendrickson: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(5), for marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. It has come to our attention that The Sports Authority, Inc. (``Sports Authority'') has been marketing the GPS Outfitters Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna in the United States. Specifically, on March 15, 2005, staff
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1036A1.html
  • La Canada, California 91011 Re: File No. EB- 05-SE-080 Dear Mr. Levra: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(5), for marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. It has come to our attention that Sport Chalet, Inc. (``Sport Chalet'') has been marketing the GPS Outfitters Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna in the United States. Specifically, on March 15, 2005, staff of
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1037A1.html
  • Ocean Isle Beach, NC 28469 Re: File No. EB- 05-SE-079 Dear Sir/Madam: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(5), for marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. It has come to our attention that The GPS Store, Inc. (``GPS Store'') has been marketing the GPS Outfitters Vortech Re- Radiator GPS Antenna in the United States. Specifically, on March 15, 2005,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1107A1.html
  • Ave. Dallas, Texas 75228 Re: File No. EB- 05-SE-007 Dear Mr. Baker: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(5), for marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the Rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter dated March 11, 2005, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau initiated an investigation into whether Dallas Avionics, Inc., (``Dallas'') is domestically marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices, specifically, the Global
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1155A1.html
  • CA 94545 Re: File No. EB- 05-SE-005 Dear Mr. Ho: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(5), for importing and marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter dated March 7, 2005,1 the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau initiated an investigation into whether Gilsson Technologies (``Gilsson'') is marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1388A1.html
  • 564 East Hampstead, NH 03826 Re: File No. EB- 05-SE-066 Dear Mr. Clark: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(5), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter dated March 15, 2005, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau initiated an investigation into whether Sandown Wireless (``Sandown'') is marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1622A1.html
  • Apartment 108 Seattle, WA 98105 Re: File No. EB- 05-SE-059 Dear Shaker Hassan: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(5), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter dated March 15, 2005, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau initiated an investigation into whether Grand Trades Co. (``Grand Trades'') is marketing in the United States unauthorized radio
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1666A1.html
  • Oaks, CA 91411 Re: File No. EB- 05-SE-170 Dear Sir or Madam: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(5), for marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The equipment authorization for the LRT-1 learned mode remote control transmitter device (``learned mode transmitter'') manufactured by Tung Shih Technology Co., Ltd. was revoked on April 18, 2005 (copy of revocation order enclosed).1
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1701A1.html
  • 22, 2005 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Hawking Technologies, Inc. (``Hawking''), apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-two thousand dollars ($22,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.204(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').2 The alleged violations involve marketing external radiofrequency power amplifiers in a manner that was inconsistent with the terms of its equipment authorization and the requirements of Section 15.204(a) of the Rules. II. BACKGROUND 2. On December 9 and 14, 2004, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') received complaints alleging that Hawking was illegally marketing the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-2036A1.html
  • OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: July 18, 2005 Released: July 20, 2005 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Memorandum Opinion and Order, we admonish TeleRadio AB (``TeleRadio'') for importing and marketing in the United States non-compliant radiofrequency devices in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.231(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').2 II. BACKGROUND 2. In 2004, the FCC's Office of Engineering and Technology (``OET'') Laboratory requested four TeleRadio remote control transmitters, designed for the remote control of cranes and hoists in industrial use, for compliance testing as part of its post-grant sampling program. On June 21, 2004, the OET Lab tested the transmitters and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-2069A1.html
  • 25, 2005 Released: July 27, 2005 By the Regional Director, South Central Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Hightech CB Shop (``Hightech'') for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').2 The noted violation involves Hightech's offering for sale a non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceiver.3 II. BACKGROUND 2. On May 9, 2001, the Commission's Tampa Office of the Enforcement Bureau (``Tampa Office'') issued a Citation to Hightech for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections 2.803(a)(1)4 and 2.815(b)5 of the Rules by offering for
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-2236A1.html
  • Los Angeles, CA 90036 Re: File No. EB- 05-SE-229 Dear Mr. Premore: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(5), for marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The equipment authorization for the Remocon LRT-1 learned mode remote control transmitter device (``learned mode transmitter''), also known as the Remocon RMC-600, manufactured by Tung Shih Technology Co., Ltd. was revoked on April
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-2237A1.html
  • 223 Reseda, CA 91335 Re: File No. EB- 05-SE-227 Dear Mr. Bitton: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(5), for marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The equipment authorization for the LRT-1 learned mode remote control transmitter device (``learned mode transmitter'') manufactured by Tung Shih Technology Co., Ltd. was revoked on April 18, 2005 (copy of revocation order enclosed).1
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-2238A1.html
  • 226 Reseda, CA 91335 Re: File No. EB- 05-SE-228 Dear Mr. Bitton: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(5), for marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The equipment authorization for the LRT-1 learned mode remote control transmitter device (``learned mode transmitter'') manufactured by Tung Shih Technology Co., Ltd. was revoked on April 18, 2005 (copy of revocation order enclosed).1
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-2318A1.html
  • 53 Parker Irvine, CA 92618 Re: File No. EB- 04-SE-253 Dear Mr. Wei: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(5), for marketing unlabeled radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a)(1). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter dated December 7, 2004, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau initiated an investigation into whether Blitzz Technology, Inc. (``Blitzz'') is marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-2352A1.html
  • NY 11237 Re: File No. EB- 05-SE-350 Dear Mr. Yao: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(5), for importing and marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter dated December 2, 2004,1 the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau initiated an investigation into whether Joe's Photo Auction is marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-2382A1.html
  • 1, 2005 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Gibson Tech Ed, Inc. (``Gibson'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000) for apparent willful and repeated violation of Sections 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').2 The noted apparent violations involve Gibson's marketing of two models of unauthorized FM broadcast transmitters. II. BACKGROUND 2. On June 30, 2004, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') issued Gibson a Citation3 for marketing unauthorized FM broadcast transmission equipment manufactured by Veronica Ltd. (``Veronica''), in violation Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803 of the Rules,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-2394A1.html
  • RI 02818 Re: File No. EB- 05-SE-173 Dear Mr. Jensen: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(5), for: (1) marketing an unauthorized radio frequency (``RF'') device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a); and (2) importing RF devices without declaring an import condition in violation of Section 2.1203 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. 2.1203. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject you to monetary forfeitures. Your response of July 14, 2005, to our letter of inquiry (``LOI'') indicates
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-2429A1.html
  • NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE Adopted: September 8, 2005 Released: September 12, 2005 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Inteligain Corporation, Inc. (``Inteligain'') has apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'')2 by marketing the Inteligain model DBA-819 dual band cellular and Personal Communications Service (``PCS'') amplifier, FCC ID # RCUDBA819-807, in a manner inconsistent with a condition in its equipment certification intended to ensure compliance with RF exposure limits. We conclude that Inteligain is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-2994A1.html
  • Nuys, CA 91406 Re: File No. EB- 05-SE-323 Dear Sir or Madam: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(5), for marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The equipment authorization for the LRT-1 learned mode remote control transmitter device (``learned mode transmitter'') was revoked on April 18, 2005 (copy of revocation order enclosed).1 Following the issuance of the revocation order,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-2998A1.html
  • Rd Alexandria, VA 22312-2707 Re: File No. EB-04-SE- 362 Dear Sir or Madame: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(5), for marketing a radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 302(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. 2.803 and 15.205(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter dated January 11, 2005,1 (Letter of Inquiry) the Spectrum Enforcement Division (SED) of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau informed Navtech Seminars and GPS Supply (Navtech) that it had
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-3062A1.html
  • Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau sent Sandown Wireless, a distributor of AS&S's products, an LOI seeking information and documents concerning its marketing of cell phone jammers and multi-purpose jammers to state and local law enforcement agencies in the United States in apparent violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').1 On behalf of Sandown, AS&S submitted a response to this LOI on March 25, 2005.2 AS&S included with its response a confidentiality request, in which AS&S asked that ``all documents found within a directory (CD-ROM) and an appendix (printed) named CONFIDENTIAL or marked CONFIDENTIAL be held in confidence and not be made available for public
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-3063A1.html
  • 3, 2004, at least a year after the Freetalker was first marketed in the United States.3 The Bureau subsequently began an investigation to determine whether Shenzhen Ruidian Communication had marketed the Freetalker two-way radio in the United States prior to obtaining an equipment certification in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Rules, and whether Shenzhen Ruidian Communication marketed the Freetalker labeled with Global Link's FCC Identifier. On March 10, 2005, the Bureau sent a letter of inquiry to Shenzhen Ruidian Communication via international certified mail, return receipt requested, facsimile and email.4 The letter directed Shenzhen Ruidian Communication to submit a response to the letter within 20 days. Shenzhen Ruidian
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-3125A1.html
  • this Memorandum Opinion and Order (``Order''), we deny the petition for reconsideration filed by Hightech CB Shop (``Hightech'') of the Forfeiture Order issued July 27, 2005.1 The Forfeiture Order imposed a monetary forfeiture in the amount of $7,000 to Hightech for the willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),2 and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').3 The noted violation involved Hightech's offering for sale a non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceiver.4 II. BACKGROUND 2. On May 9, 2001, the Commission's Tampa Office of the Enforcement Bureau (``Tampa Office'') issued a Citation to Hightech for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections 2.803(a)(1)5 and 2.815(b)6 of the Rules by offering for
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-345A1.html
  • (``NAL''), we find Bureau D'Electronique Appliquee, Inc. (``B.E.A.'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000) for importing and marketing in the United States unauthorized intentional radiating devices,1 specifically, the Wizard and Falcon microwave motion sensors, in willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),2 and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). 3 II. BACKGROUND 2. On August 3, 2004, the Enforcement Bureau received an informal complaint alleging that B.E.A. is importing and marketing a substantial number of unauthorized motion sensors in the United States, specifically, the Wizard, Falcon and MS-07. In support of the allegation, the complainant explained that none of the subject motion sensors are
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-42A1.html
  • this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau and St. Louis Music, Inc. (``SLM''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Enforcement Bureau into whether SLM's manufacture, importation, marketing and sale of certain Class B digital audio devices violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (``Act'')1 and Sections 2.803(a), 15.19 and 15.105(b) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').2 2. The Enforcement Bureau and SLM have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve this matter and terminate the investigation. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. Based on the record before us, we conclude that no substantial or material questions of
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-1084A1.html
  • 1001 W. Fayette Street Syracuse, New York 13204-2859 Re: File No. EB-06-SE-071 Dear Mr. Hill: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). As explained below, future violations of the equipment provisions of the Act and Rules may subject Oneida Air Systems, Inc. ("Oneida") to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry ("LOI") dated March 6, 2006, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau initiated an investigation into whether Oneida marketed dust collection equipment with unauthorized remote
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-1334A1.html
  • 2006 Released: June 29, 2006 By the Regional Director, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Forfeiture Order ("Order"), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to TravelCenters of America ("TravelCenters") in Troutdale, Oregon, for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 302(b) of the Commissions Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). On July 27, 2005, the Enforcement Bureau's Portland Resident Agent Office issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL") after determining that TravelCenters offered for sale a non-certified Citizens Band ("CB") transceiver. In this Order, we consider TravelCenters' argument that the type of transceivers it offered for sale are not covered by the Commission's
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-136A1.html
  • 25, 2006 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Ramsey Electronics, Inc. (``Ramsey''), apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 and Sections 2.803(a) and (g) and 2.815(b) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').2 The noted apparent violations involve Ramsey's marketing of two models of unauthorized FM broadcast transmitters and two models of external radio frequency (``RF'') power amplifiers (``amplifiers''). II. BACKGROUND 2. The Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') obtained information indicating that Ramsey was apparently marketing unauthorized FM broadcast transmitters and RF amplifiers in the United
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-1413A1.html
  • the Bureau. (f) "Adopting Order" means an order of the Bureau adopting the terms and conditions of this Consent Decree. (g) "Effective Date" means the date on which the Bureau releases the Adopting Order. (h) "Investigation" means the investigation commenced by the Bureau's November 17, 2004 Letter of Inquiry regarding whether AMAC violated Section 302(b) of the Act and/or Sections 2.803 and 2.925 of the Rules. (i) "Rules" means the Commission's Rules found in Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations. (j) "Act" means the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. SS151 et seq. Terms of Agreement 6. The Parties agree that the provisions of this Consent Decree shall be subject to final approval by the Bureau by
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-1436A1.html
  • John Reed Court City of Industry, CA 91745 Re: File No. EB-05-SE-018 Dear Mr. Ho: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices, specifically, external radio frequency power amplifiers, in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections 2.803 and 15.204(d) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On August 2, 2005, staff from the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("SED") of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau visited the internet web site store for OvisLink products, http://store.ovislink.com ("OvisLink online store"). The OvisLink online store listed
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-1442A1.html
  • 17, 2006 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find AboCom Systems, Inc. ("AboCom") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The apparent violations involve marketing wireless access points that do not comply with the terms of its equipment authorization and the requirements of Section 15.247(d) of the Rules. II. background 2. The equipment involved in this proceeding is the Hawking Technology, Inc. ("Hawking") Model HWRG54 wireless access point ("HWRG54") and the identical Phoebe Micro, Inc.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-1607A1.html
  • EB-06-SE-259 Dear Mr. Mazursky: This is an official CITATION, issued to Digital Innovations, L.L.C. ("Digital Innovations") pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing two non-compliant radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. Following receipt of a complaint alleging that Digital Innovations is marketing in the United States two radio frequency devices, specifically, the Security Dr. PC Defender Screen Lock and the Security Dr. Wireless
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-1697A1.html
  • By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Memorandum Opinion and Order, we deny a petition for reconsideration filed by Gibson Tech Ed Inc., d/b/a/ Hobbytron.com ("Gibson"), of a Forfeiture Order imposing a forfeiture of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The violations involved Gibson's marketing of two models (R-FM25B-WT) and (R-FM100B-WT) of unauthorized FM broadcast transmitters. II. BACKGROUND 2. On June 30, 2004, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") issued Gibson a Citation for marketing unauthorized FM broadcast transmission equipment manufactured by Veronica Ltd. ("Veronica"), in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a) of
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-1933A1.html
  • September 27, 2006 Released: September 29, 2006 By the Regional Director, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Forfeiture Order ("Order"), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Clegg Industries, Inc. ("Clegg") in Torrance, California, for repeatedly violating Section 302(b) of the Commissions Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). On December 21, 2005, the Enforcement Bureau's Seattle District Office issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL") after determining that Clegg had apparently repeatedly imported and marketed non-authorized radio frequency devices. In this Order, we consider Clegg's argument that it was unaware that the device in question was in violation of the Commission's
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-1936A1.html
  • 29, 2006 By the Regional Director, South Central Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Forfeiture Order ("Order"), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) to Love's Travel Stops and Country Stores, Inc. ("Loves") for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted violation involves Love's offering for sale non-certified Citizens Band ("CB") transceivers. II. BACKGROUND 2. On October 15, 2001, and November 13, 2002, Enforcement Bureau field agents visited two Loves' retail outlets in Weatherford and Anna, Texas. At these locations, the stores displayed and offered for sale various models of non-certified CB transceivers marketed
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-2019A1.html
  • of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain wireless cameras, specifically, 10 Watt 1.2 GHz Wireless Camera Video AV Transmitter Receivers ("1.2 GHz wireless cameras"), that are not eligible to receive a grant of equipment certification, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803 and 15.205(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On August 30, 2005, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that LightObject d/b/a Actionbuy Trading Co. ("LightObject") was marketing on eBay
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-2229A1.html
  • Date: November 2, 2006 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Forfeiture Order ("Order"), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of eleven thousand two hundred dollars ($11,200) to Vitec Group Communications Limited ("Vitec") for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted violations involve Vitec's marketing of unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. II. BACKGROUND 1. In May 2005, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") received a complaint alleging that Clear-Com Communication Systems was marketing unapproved radiofrequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a) of the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-2286A1.html
  • ORDER Adopted: November 7, 2006 Released: November 9, 2006 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Forfeiture Order ("Order"), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) against AboCom Systems, Inc. ("AboCom") for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The violations involve marketing wireless access points that do not comply with the terms of its equipment authorization and the requirements of Section 15.247(d) of the Rules. 2. On July 17, 2006, the Spectrum Enforcement Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL") in the amount of $25,000 to AboCom. AboCom has not
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-2350A1.html
  • 2006 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Communications Specialists, Inc. ("CSI") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for apparent willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted apparent violations involve CSI's marketing of radio frequency devices in the United States that do not comply with the radiated emission limits set forth in Section 15.209 of the Rules and the periodic operation limits set forth in Section 15.231 of the Rules. II. BACKGROUND 2. CSI manufactures and markets the PT-1 "Petlocator"
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-2479A1.html
  • Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Forfeiture Order ("Order"), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of twenty-one thousand dollars ($21,000) to Wesley Noe, d.b.a. GI Joe's Radio Electronics and GI Joe's CB Radio (collectively referred to herein as "GI Joe's") for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, ("Act"), and Sections 2.803(a)(1), 2.815(b), and 2.815(c) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by offering for sale non-certified Citizens Band ("CB") transceivers and external radio frequency ("RF") power amplifiers. II. BACKGROUND 2. On April 19, 2006, the Detroit Office issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture in the amount of $21,000 to GI Joe's. In the NAL, the Detroit Office found that GI Joe's
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-2497A1.html
  • Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find American Future Technology Corporation d/b/a iBuypower ("iBuypower") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000) for apparent willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted apparent violations involve iBuypower's marketing of unauthorized computers to the general public. II. BACKGROUND 1. By letter dated November 29, 2005, the Commission's Office of Engineering and Technology ("OET") notified iBuypower of the apparent improper marketing of its AMD Athlon-64 and Athlon-64 X2 computers. Specifically, OET noted that iBuypower was marketing the computers
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-2499A1.html
  • OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: December 12, 2006 Released: December 14, 2006 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Memorandum Opinion and Order, we admonish Multispectral Solutions, Inc. ("MSSI") for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). II. BACKGROUND 2. MSSI manufactures and markets an ultra-wideband ("UWB") precision asset localization system that utilizes an UWB receiver and processor hub. The receiver and processor hub are classified as Class A digital devices and are required to be verified under Section 15.101(a) of the Rules. 3. On October 31, 2006, in response to a
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-2549A1.html
  • December 21, 2006 By the Regional Director, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Forfeiture Order ("Order"), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Gambler's CB & Ham Radio Sales & Service ("Gambler") for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (the "Rules"), by offering for sale non-certified Citizens Band ("CB") transceivers. II. BACKGROUND 2. On April 5, 2004, the FCC Enforcement Bureau's Detroit Field Office ("Detroit Office") received information that Gambler was marketing illegal, non-FCC certified devices. Agents from the Detroit Office visited Gambler in Pinconning, Michigan on April 9, 2004, and observed that Gambler displayed
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-587A1.html
  • Myers, FL 33917 Re: File No. EB-05-SE-196 Dear Mr. Holbrook: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Section 2.803 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S 2.803. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. Your response dated December 5, 2005 to our Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") issued on November 22, 2005, acknowledged that you marketed an uncertified radiofrequency device for Citizen's Band ("CB") use, the Magnum
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-591A1.html
  • thousand six hundred dollars ($5,600) for marketing in the United States unauthorized intentional radiating devices, specifically, wireless monitoring devices used primarily by oil and gas companies for the collection of data and monitoring of remote well sites, process facilities and pipelines, in willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). II. BACKGROUND 2. On October 26, 2005, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Enforcement Bureau received an informal complaint alleging that OleumTech was manufacturing and marketing unauthorized radiofrequency devices. The complaint listed the model numbers of several transmitters which were allegedly unauthorized. In support of the allegation, the complainant explained that it ordered one of
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-606A1.html
  • Adopted: March 17, 2006 Released: March 21, 2006 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Forfeiture Order ("Order"), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000) against Gibson Tech Ed, Inc. ("Gibson") for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted violations involve Gibson marketing of two models (R-FM25B-WT) and (R-FM100B-WT) of unauthorized FM broadcast transmitters. 2. On September 1, 2005, the Enforcement Bureau, Spectrum Enforcement Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL") in the amount of $14,000 to Gibson. Gibson has not filed a response to the NAL. Based on
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-853A1.html
  • 2006 Released: April 17, 2006 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Forfeiture Order ("Order"), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seventeen thousand six hundred dollars ($17,600) to Hawking Technologies, Inc. ("Hawking") for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.204(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The violations involve marketing external radiofrequency power amplifiers in a manner that was inconsistent with the terms of its equipment authorization and the prohibition against the marketing of such devices. II. background 2. On December 9 and 14, 2004, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") received complaints alleging that Hawking was illegally marketing the Hawking
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-861A1.html
  • By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Vitec Group Communications Limited ("Vitec") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000) for apparent willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted apparent violations involve Vitec's marketing of unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. II. BACKGROUND 1. In May 2005, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") received a complaint alleging that Clear-Com Communication Systems ("Vitec") was marketing unapproved radiofrequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a)
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-999A1.html
  • Adopted: May 9, 2006 Released: May 11, 2006 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Forfeiture Order ("Order"), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of five thousand six hundred dollars ($5,600) against OleumTech Corporation ("OleumTech") for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted violations involve OleumTech's marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices, specifically, wireless monitoring devices used primarily by oil and gas companies for the collection of data and monitoring of remote well sites, process facilities and pipelines. 2. On March 17, 2006, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Enforcement Bureau issued a
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-13A1.html
  • February 16, 2006 By the Commission: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') and Order, we find that Behringer USA, Inc. (``Behringer'') marketed 50 models of unauthorized radio frequency devices specifically, digital audio music devices, in apparent willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').2 Significantly, we find that Behringer continued to import and market substantial numbers of these unauthorized devices for more than a year after the Enforcement Bureau initiated an inquiry into Behringer's compliance with the Commission's equipment authorization requirements. Based on the facts and circumstances before us, including the egregious nature of Behringer's continued non-compliance, we conclude
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-30A1.html
  • this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we propose a forfeiture amount of seventy five thousand dollars ($75,000) against San Jose Navigation, Inc. ("San Jose") for its marketing of intentional radiating equipment, Global Positioning Satellite ("GPS") signal re-radiator kits, in apparent willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and Sections 2.803 and 15.205 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The GPS re-radiator kits are not Commission authorized and are not eligible for such authorization, because they operate in restricted frequency bands allocated for authorized safety-of-life operations. II. BACKGROUND 2. Section 302 of the Act authorizes the Commission to make reasonable regulations, consistent with the public interest, governing the interference potential of equipment
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-37A1.html
  • ORDER Adopted: March 21, 2006 Released: March 23, 2006 By the Commission: I. introduction 1. By this Forfeiture Order ("Order"), we find that ACR Electronics, Inc. ("ACR") marketed intentional radiating equipment prior to obtaining Commission certification in willful and repeated violation of the equipment marketing requirements of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). For these violations, we impose a monetary forfeiture in the amount of sixty five thousand dollars ($65,000). II. background 2. Section 302(b) of the Act provides that "[n]o person shall manufacture, import, sell, offer for sale, or ship devices of home electronic equipment and systems, or use devices, which fail to comply with regulations promulgated
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-53A1.html
  • 2006 Released: May 11, 2006 By the Commission: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Commission and Pilot Travel Centers LLC ("Pilot"). The Consent Decree terminates the forfeiture proceeding initiated by the Commission against Pilot for its apparent violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by offering for sale radio frequency devices without the required Commission equipment authorization. 2. The Commission and Pilot have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve this matter and terminate the forfeiture proceeding. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1271A1.html
  • the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Richard Mann d/b/a The Antique Radio Collector apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted apparent violations involve marketing of uncertified AM radio transmitters. II. background 2. On November 15, 2006, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Enforcement Bureau issued a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to The Antique Radio Collector in response to a complaint alleging that The Antique Radio Collector was marketing in the United States fully-assembled
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1313A1.html
  • 16, 2007 By the Regional Director, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Forfeiture Order ("Order"), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000) to Charles E. Vance, III d/b/a CB Candy Electronics ("Vance"), for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Commissions Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 2.815(c) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). On March 22, 2006, the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL") in the amount of $14,000 to Vance for offering for sale non-certified Citizens Band ("CB") transceivers and external RF power amplifiers in Ontario, California. In this Order, we affirm the findings of the Los
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1673A1.html
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Audio Direct is marketing the RMR-S201 and the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1674A1.html
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Buy.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1675A1.html
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Audio Discounters is marketing the RMR-S201 and the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1676A1.html
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Ambient Weather is marketing the RMR-S201 and the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1753A1.html
  • 812 Kings Highway Saugerties, NY 12477 Re: File No. EB-06-SE-365 Dear Mr. Krein: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Section 2.803 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S 2.803; for importing radio frequency devices that do not meet one or more of the specified import conditions in violation of Section 2.1204(a) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 2.1204(a); and for being unable to document compliance with the selected import conditions in violation of Section 2.1204(b) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1754A1.html
  • or Madam: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States a police radar jamming device manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-C450 device, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Chumbo.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1756A1.html
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that CompSource, Inc. is marketing the RMR-S201 and the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1757A1.html
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Cybergiftcenter.com, Inc. is marketing the RMR-S201 and the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1758A1.html
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Dealznet.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1760A1.html
  • Vitec Group Communications Limited ("Vitec"). Vitec seeks reconsideration of a Forfeiture Order issued by the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") to Vitec on October 31, 2006, which assessed a forfeiture of eleven thousand two hundred dollars ($11,200) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted violations involve Vitec's marketing of unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. II. BACKGROUND 2. In May 2005, the Bureau received a complaint alleging that Clear-Com Communication Systems was marketing unapproved radiofrequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a) of the Rules. Specifically,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1763A1.html
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that TheElectronicCompany.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1764A1.html
  • Mr. Berkowitz: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States a police radar jamming device manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-C450 device, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Focus Camera, Inc. is marketing the RMR-S201 and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1766A1.html
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Fadfusion is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1767A1.html
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that DSMiller.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1784A1.html
  • by AboCom Systems, Inc. ("AboCom"). Abocom seeks reconsideration of a Forfeiture Order issued by the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau on November 7, 2006, in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000). In the Forfeiture Order, the Division found willful and repeated violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), involving AboCom's marketing of wireless access points that do not comply with the terms of its equipment authorization and the requirements of Section 15.247(d) of the Rules. II. background 2. In 2005, the Division received a report from Industry Canada indicating that a wireless access point marketed under an equipment certification granted to AboCom, FCC
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1789A1.html
  • 2007 Released: April 24, 2007 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau and Trimble Navigation, Limited ("TNL"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Enforcement Bureau into whether TNL violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the "Act"), and Section 2.803 of the Commission's Rules (the "Rules"), regarding the manufacture, importation, marketing and sale of unlicensed wireless devices. 2. The Enforcement Bureau and TNL have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve this matter and terminate the investigation. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. In the absence of new material
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-2994A1.html
  • an official CITATION, issued to Mr. Lance McCuistion, d/b as LM Services and Scorpion Jammer Technology ("Scorpion") pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States, specifically, the Scorpion "Ultimate" KA Jammer and Scorpion Jammer devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). In addition, you have failed to respond to directives of the Enforcement Bureau to provide certain information and documents. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On June 14, 2005, December 15, 2006, and January 25, 2007, staff from the Spectrum Enforcement Division observed on your
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-299A1.html
  • 31, 2007 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted apparent violations involve RMR's marketing of its RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 models of police radar jamming devices ("jammers"). II. background 2. The Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information, through several informal complaints, alleging that RMR was manufacturing and marketing unauthorized police radar jammers in the United States.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-304A1.html
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Auto-Radar-Detectors.com, were marketing police radar jamming
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-307A1.html
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Best Radar Detectors, were marketing police
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-308A1.html
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803 and 15.205. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Electronic Retail Solutions, Inc., were marketing police radar
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-309A1.html
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Global Trade Group, Inc., were marketing
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-310A1.html
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Hoeffener International, were marketing police radar
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-311A1.html
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803 and 15.205. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Radar Detectors Direct, were marketing police radar jamming
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-312A1.html
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Radarjammers.com, were marketing police radar jamming
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-313A1.html
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803 and 15.205. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including The Twister Group, Inc., were marketing police radar
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-321A1.html
  • Lane Williamsville, NY 14221 Re: File No. EB-05-SE-174 Dear Mr. Struckmeyer: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Section 2.803 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S 2.803. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that DreamBox USA was importing and marketing unauthorized direct broadcast satellite receivers, the DreamBox DM500-S ("DM500-S") and the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3266A1.html
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Overseas Best Buy, Inc. dba 110220volts.com is marketing
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3270A1.html
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Unbeatablesale.com, Inc. is marketing the RMR-S201 and the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3392A1.html
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that ShoppersChoice.com, LLC is marketing the RMR-S201 and the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3393A1.html
  • Dear Sir/Madam: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-C450 device, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Shopila Corporation is marketing the RMR-C450 device. On
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3483A1.html
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Gain Saver is marketing the RMR-S201 and the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3599A1.html
  • ORDER Adopted: August 14, 2007 Released: August 16, 2007 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Forfeiture Order ("Order"), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) against Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR") for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted violations involve RMR's marketing of its RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 models of police radar jamming devices. 2. On January 31, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL") in the amount of $25,000 to RMR. RMR has not filed a response to the NAL. Based
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3974A1.html
  • S: 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain wireless cameras and wireless camera converters, specifically, 10 Watt, 1.2 GHz Cantek Wireless Camera and Camera Converter Transmitter Receivers ("1.2 GHz wireless camera transmitter receivers"), that are not eligible to receive a grant of equipment certification, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communication Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803 and 15.205(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 6, 2007, staff in the Enforcement Bureau's Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") visited the internet store for Surveillance-Video products, www.surveillance-video.com ("Surveillance-Video online store"). The Surveillance-Video online store listed
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-4374A1.html
  • 2007 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Microwave Radio Communications LLC ("MRC") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 90.203 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted apparent violations involve the marketing of uncertified 4.9 GHz aeronautical transmitting equipment ("4.9 GHz equipment"). II. background 2. On January 10, 2007, the Commission's Office of Engineering and Technology ("OET") sent a letter to MRC in response to allegations that it may be manufacturing and marketing uncertified 4.9 GHz equipment. In
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-4449A1.html
  • N. Camac Street Philadelphia, PA 19133 Re: File No. EB-06-SE-222 Dear Mr. King: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Section 2.803 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S: 2.803. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry dated March 28, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau ("the Division") initiated an investigation into whether Basic Home Shopping is marketing in the United
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-452A1.html
  • ORDER Adopted: January 31, 2007 Released: February 2, 2007 By the Regional Director, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Forfeiture Order ("Order"), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000) to Jason Kaltenbach ("Kaltenbach") d/b/a Metamerchant, for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 302(b) of the Commissions Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted violation includes offering for sale non-certified VHF and UHF transceivers in Laguna Nigel, California. 2. On November 9, 2006, the District Director of the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL") in the amount of $14,000 to Kaltenbach. Despite repeated contacts by the Los Angeles Office,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-4570A1.html
  • I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Liam Patrick Ryan d/b/a L. P. Ryan / Low Power Radio ("Low Power Radio") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted apparent violations involve marketing of uncertified AM radio transmitters. II. background 2. On May 30, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Enforcement Bureau issued a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to Low Power Radio in response to information that Low Power Radio was marketing in the United States fully-assembled AM transmitters; specifically, the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-4716A1.html
  • 2007 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Forfeiture Order ("Order"), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Richard Mann d/b/a The Antique Radio Collector ("Antique Radio Collector") for willful and repeated violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted violations involve Antique Radio Collector's marketing of uncertified AM radio transmitters. II. background 2. Section 302(b) of the Act provides that "[n]o person shall manufacture, import, sell, offer for sale, or ship devices or home electronic equipment and systems, or use devices, which fail to comply with regulations promulgated pursuant to this section."
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-4874A1.html
  • No. EB-07-SE-194 Dear Mr. Melo: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), to BRD Security Products, Inc. d/b/a Spybase.com ("BRD") for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803 and 15.205(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry dated October 9, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau ("the Division") initiated an investigation into whether BRD is marketing in
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-4894A1.html
  • means the 4.9 GHz Carry-Coder II COFDM Digital Wireless Camera System. (f) "Commission" and "FCC" mean the Federal Communications Commission. (g) "Effective Date" means the date on which the Bureau releases the Adopting Order. (h) "Investigation" means the investigation commenced by the Bureau's May 23, 2007 Letter of Inquiry regarding whether BMS violated Section 302(b) of the Act and/or Section 2.803 of the Rules. (i) "Parties" means BMS and the Bureau. (j) "Rules" means the Commission's Rules found in Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations. III. BACKGROUND 3. BMS manufactures and distributes the Carry-Coder II ("CCII") COFDM Digital Wireless Camera System that operates in the 4.9 GHz band. The CCII System provides law enforcement and public safety agencies with
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-808A1.html
  • Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau and Communications Specialists, Inc. ("CSI"). The Consent Decree terminates the forfeiture proceeding initiated by the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Enforcement Bureau against CSI for its possible violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). 2. The Enforcement Bureau and CSI have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve this matter and terminate the forfeiture proceeding. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. Based on the record before us, we conclude that no substantial or material questions of fact exist
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-881A1.html
  • South Central Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Forfeiture Order ("Order"), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Ben Metzger dba 1 Stop Communications / 1 Stop CB Shop in Titusville, Florida for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted violation involves Mr. Metzger's offering for sale non-certified Citizens Band ("CB") transceivers. II. BACKGROUND 2. On March 21, 2006, the Commission's Tampa Office of the Enforcement Bureau ("Tampa Office") issued Mr. Metzger / 1 Stop Communications / 1 Stop CB Shop a Citation for marketing at his store in Titusville non-certified CB transceivers,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-100A1.html
  • FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: May 23, 2007 Released: June 1, 2007 By the Commission: I. INTRODUCTION 1. By this Forfeiture Order ("Order"), we find that Behringer USA, Inc. ("Behringer") marketed 50 models of unauthorized radio frequency equipment, specifically digital audio music devices, in willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). We further find that Behringer's violations warrant, and the record before us supports, the imposition of a forfeiture in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. Section 302(b) of the Act provides that "[n]o person shall manufacture, import, sell, offer for sale, or ship devices of home electronic equipment and systems, or
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-209A1.html
  • 3, 2007 By the Commission: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Austin Hughes Solutions, Inc. ("Austin Hughes") apparently liable for a forfeiture for marketing nine models of non-verified Class A digital devices in apparent willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). Based on the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that Austin Hughes is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of sixty-three thousand dollars ($63,000). II. background 2. Section 302 of the Act authorizes the Commission to make reasonable regulations, consistent with the public interest, governing the interference potential of equipment that emits
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-3A1.html
  • radiating equipment, specifically Global Positioning Satellite ("GPS") signal re-radiator kits, which are not authorized and not eligible for authorization by the Commission because the devices operate in restricted frequency bands. We further find that, in marketing these GPS signal re-radiator kits, San Jose willfully and repeatedly violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). For San Jose's violations, we impose a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. Section 302(b) of the Act provides that "[n]o person shall manufacture, import, sell, offer for sale, or ship devices of home electronic equipment and systems, or use devices, which fail to comply with
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-45A1.html
  • March 28, 2007 Released: April 2, 2007 By the Commission: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Hawking Technologies, Inc. ("Hawking") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.204(d) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The apparent violations involve marketing external radio frequency power amplifiers in a manner that was inconsistent with the terms of Hawking's equipment authorization and the requirements of Section 15.204(d) of the Rules. II. background 2. Section 302 of the Act authorizes the Commission to make reasonable regulations, consistent with the public interest, governing
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-49A1.html
  • FORFEITURE Adopted: March 30, 2007 Released: March 30, 2007 By the Commission: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Ramko Distributors, Inc. ("Ramko") apparently liable for marketing 17 models of non-certified radio transceivers, in apparent willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The subject devices are neither Commission authorized, nor eligible for such authorization. Based on the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that Ramko is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). II. background 2. Section 302 of the Act authorizes the Commission to make reasonable regulations,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1193A1.html
  • Victor McCormack Phonejammer.com Re: File No. EB-07-SE-031 Dear Mr. McCormack: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), to Phonejammer.com ("Phonejammer") for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and section 2.803 of the Commission's rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S: 2.803, and for failing to respond to Enforcement Bureau directives to provide certain information and documents. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry ("LOI") dated November 6, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Commission's
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1196A1.html
  • File No. EB-08-SE-202 Dear Mr. Bassler: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), to David Steele Enterprises, Inc. ("David Steele") for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803 and 15.205(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry of inquiry ("LOI") dated May 15, 2008, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau ("Division") initiated an investigation into whether David Steele
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1202A1.html
  • Kittridge Street #12 Reseda, California 91335-6164 Re: File No. EB-08-SE-203 Dear Mr. Henry: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803 and 15.205(a), and for failing to fully respond to Enforcement Bureau directives to provide certain information and documents. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry ("LOI") dated May 16, 2008, the Spectrum Enforcement
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1299A1.html
  • Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Forfeiture Order ("Order"), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of six hundred ten dollars ($610) to Liam Patrick Ryan d/b/a L. P. Ryan / Low Power Radio ("Low Power Radio") for the willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted violation involves Low Power Radio's marketing of uncertified AM radio transmitters. II. BACKGROUND 2. On May 30, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau issued a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to Low Power Radio in response to information alleging that Low Power Radio was marketing in the United States fully-assembled
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-155A1.html
  • Dear Ms. and Mr. Bollaro: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), to Garden State Investigations and Security ("Garden State") for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803 and 15.205(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry dated October 2, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau ("Division") initiated an investigation into whether Garden State is marketing in
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-167A1.html
  • January 29, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Ryzex, Inc. ("Ryzex") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of eight thousand dollars ($8,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted apparent violations involve Ryzex's marketing of noncompliant portable data terminals ("PDTs"). II. BACKGROUND 2. The Enforcement Bureau's Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") received a complaint alleging that Ryzex had modified PDTs manufactured by Symbol Technologies, Inc. ("Symbol") by replacing their two megabytes per second ("mbps") radio assemblies with 11 mbps radio assemblies without authorization
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1685A1.html
  • RECEIPT REQUESTED Vladimir Reznik, Owner RangeVideo Re: File No. EB-08-SE-182 Dear Mr. Reznik: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S: 2.803 and 15.205(a), and importing radio frequency devices without filing FCC Form 740 (or the electronic equivalent) with the United States Customs and Border Patrol, in violation of Section 1.1203 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S: 1.1203. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1754A1.html
  • Released: July 30, 2008 By the Regional Director, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Forfeiture Order ("Order"), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Michael T. Kersnowski ("Kersnowski"), d/b/a www.radioactiveradios.com, in Salem, Oregon, for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted violations involve Kersnowski's marketing and offering for sale non-certified Citizens Band ("CB") transceivers. 2. On March 28, 2008, the Resident Agent of the Enforcement Bureau's Portland Resident Agent Office issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL") in the amount of $7,000 to Kersnowski for offering for sale non-certified CB transceivers in
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1937A1.html
  • 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Microboards Technology, LLC ("Microboards") is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The apparent violations involve marketing unauthorized and non-compliant digital devices in the United States. II. background 2. The Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Microboards was marketing the Orbit 3 Disc Duplicator, and the MicroOrbit Disc Duplicator digital video disc ("DVD") and/or compact disc ("CD") duplicators in the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1951A1.html
  • 25, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Leetek America, Inc. ("Leetek") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000) for willful and repeated violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted apparent violations involve Leetek's marketing of two unauthorized pager transmitter systems. II. BACKGROUND 2. Leetek is the United States subsidiary of Lee Technology Korea Co., Ltd. ("LTK"). LTK manufactures pager transmitter systems, which are devices used for communicating in, for example, restaurants and hospitals. LTK established Leetek as its United States subsidiary in
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1952A1.html
  • 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Data Capture Solutions, Inc. ("DCS") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of four thousand dollars ($4,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted apparent violations involve DCS's marketing of noncompliant portable data terminals ("PDTs"). II. BACKGROUND 2. The Enforcement Bureau's Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") received a complaint alleging that DCS had modified a PDT manufactured by Symbol Technologies, Inc. ("Symbol") by replacing the two megabytes per second ("mbps") radio assembly with an 11 mbps radio assembly
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2042A1.html
  • September 8, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find CoachComm, LLC ("CoachComm") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for willful and repeated violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted apparent violations involve the marketing of an unauthorized radio frequency device. II. background 2. On August 15, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Enforcement Bureau ("Division") received a complaint regarding CoachComm's manufacture and marketing of a wireless intercom system under the trade name Connex that uses a belt pack and base station
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2051A1.html
  • Maurine Lane Grand Junction, CO 81504 Re: File No. EB-08-SE-034 Dear Mr. Marston: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Section 2.803 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S: 2.803. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry ("LOI") dated June 3, 2008, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau ("the Division") initiated an investigation into whether MicroVideoX, LLC, ("MicroVideoX") is marketing in the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2052A1.html
  • 11, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Wavetrend Technologies, Ltd. ("Wavetrend"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Wavetrend for possible violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") regarding the marketing of certain radio frequency identification devices. 2. The Bureau and Wavetrend have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2437A1.html
  • By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find XLNT Idea, Inc. ("XLNT Idea") is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000) for willful and repeated violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The apparent violations involve marketing unauthorized digital devices in the United States. II. background 2. The Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that XLNT Idea was marketing the Nexis 100AP AutoPrinter, the Nexis 100AP Publisher, and the Xi440 CD/DVD Printer in the United States without the appropriate labels as
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2673A1.html
  • 10, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Multi-Tech Systems, Inc. ("Multi-Tech") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of four thousand dollars ($4,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.105(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted apparent violations involve Multi-Tech's marketing of a radio frequency device without including the required consumer disclosure in the user manual. II. BACKGROUND 2. Multi-Tech is a manufacturer of communications and device networking products that provide voice and data services over internet protocol networks. One of its products, the CallFinder(R) Global System
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2734A1.html
  • 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Redflex Traffic Systems, Inc. ("Redflex"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Redflex for possible violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803(a), 2.925, 15.19, 15.201 and 90.203 of the Commission's rules ("Rules") regarding the marketing and use of two models of radar speed meter equipment. 2. The Bureau and Redflex have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-472A1.html
  • 29, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find DBK Concepts, Inc. ("DBK") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted apparent violations involve DBK's marketing of noncompliant portable data terminals ("PDTs"). II. BACKGROUND 2. The Enforcement Bureau's Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") received a complaint alleging that DBK had modified PDTs manufactured by Symbol Technologies, Inc. ("Symbol") by replacing their two megabytes per second ("mbps") radio assemblies with 11 mbps radio assemblies without authorization
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-528A1.html
  • By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Memorandum Opinion and Order, we admonish Global Microwave Systems, Inc. ("GMS") for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices, specifically, uncertified 4.9 GHz aeronautical transmitting equipment ("4.9 GHz equipment"), in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 90.203 of the Commission's rules ("rules"). II. BACKGROUND 2. GMS manufactures and markets microwave radio systems and other devices. On January 10, 2007, the Commission's Office of Engineering and Technology ("OET") sent a letter to GMS in response to allegations that it may be manufacturing and marketing uncertified 4.9 GHz equipment. In its response to OET's letter, GMS acknowledged
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-597A1.html
  • 2008 By the Regional Director, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Forfeiture Order ("Order"), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to CB Shop & More, LLLP ("CB Shop"), in Loveland, Colorado, for willful and repeated violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). On August 28, 2007, the Enforcement Bureau's Denver Office issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL") to CB Shop after determining that CB Shop offered for sale a non-certified Citizens Band ("CB") transceiver. In this Order, we consider CB Shop's argument that the CB transceiver at issue did not require Commission certification. II.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-74A1.html
  • South 1675 West Orem, UT 84058 Re: File No. EB-07-SE-250 Dear Mr. Royer: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and section 2.803 of the Commission's rules ("rules"), 47 C.F.R. S: 2.803. In addition, you have failed to respond to directives of the Enforcement Bureau to provide certain information and documents. As explained below, future violations of these rules may subject Absolute Toy Marketing, Inc. to monetary forfeitures. After receiving a complaint, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau began an
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-968A1.html
  • Mann d/b/a The Antique Radio Collector ("Antique Radio Collector"). Antique Radio Collector seeks reconsideration of a Forfeiture Order issued by the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau on November 27, 2007, in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for willful and repeated violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted violations involved Antique Radio Collector's marketing of uncertified AM radio transmitters. II. BACKGROUND 2. On November 15, 2006, the Division sent a letter of inquiry ("LOI") to Antique Radio Collector in response to a complaint alleging that Antique Radio Collector was marketing in the United States fully assembled uncertified AM transmitters, specifically the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1031A1.html
  • By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order ("NAL"), we find Sennheiser Electronic Corporation ("Sennheiser") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The apparent violation involves Sennheiser's marketing of unauthorized radio frequency devices. II. BACKGROUND 2. In July 2008, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") began an investigation into Sennheiser's marketing of wireless microphones. In a letter of inquiry ("LOI") dated August 15, 2008, the Division instructed Sennheiser to provide specific information regarding the manufacture,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1198A1.html
  • Released: May 29, 2009 By the Regional Director, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Forfeiture Order ("Order"), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Orvac Electronics, Inc. ("Orvac"), in Fullerton, California, for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). On May 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL") to Orvac after determining that Orvac marketed non-certified 2.4 GHz wireless video transmitters and wireless cameras (intentional radiators). In this Order, we consider Orvac's argument that the devices at issue were registered with the FCC. II.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1281A1.html
  • June 12, 2009 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Mobilarm, Ltd. ("Mobilarm"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Mobilarm for possible violations of 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (the "Act"), and Sections 2.803 and 80.203(a) of the Communications Rules ("Rules"), regarding the marketing of an uncertified radio frequency device in the United States. 2. The Bureau and Mobilarm have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1304A1.html
  • Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Honeywell International Inc., acting through its Sensing and Control strategic business unit ("Honeywell Sensing and Control"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau into whether Honeywell Sensing and Control violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.223 of the Commission's rules ("Rules") regarding the marketing and radio frequency emissions of the Honeywell Sensing and Control TMS-9000, a torque measurement device. 2. The Bureau and Honeywell Sensing and Control have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1358A1.html
  • Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Alco Electronics Ltd. ("Alco"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Alco for possible violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (the "Act") 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803(a), 2.948(d), and 15.19(b) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803(a), 2.948(d), and 15.19(b), regarding the marketing and labeling of digital television converter boxes. 2. The Bureau and Alco have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1390A1.html
  • 25, 2009 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Midland Radio Corporation. ("Midland") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-one thousand dollars ($21,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and Section 2.803(g) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted apparent violations involve Midland's marketing of noncompliant General Mobile Radio Service ("GMRS") transmitters. II. BACKGROUND 2. Section 95.183(a)(4) of the Rules prohibits GMRS operators from transmitting coded messages and messages with hidden meanings. The Enforcement Bureau's Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") received information indicating that Midland was marketing GMRS transmitters that have a voice
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1428A1.html
  • Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order ("NAL"), we find Iftron Technologies, Inc. ("Iftron") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of five thousand six hundred dollars ($5,600) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The apparent violation involves Iftron's marketing of an audio/video transmitter that operates on a restricted frequency and therefore is not eligible for a grant of equipment certification. II. BACKGROUND 1. The Enforcement Bureau's Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") received information that Iftron was marketing audio/video transmitters that are capable of operating on a restricted
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-146A1.html
  • 2, 2009 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Proxim Wireless Corporation ("Proxim") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of eleven thousand dollars ($11,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted apparent violations involve Proxim's marketing of non-compliant wireless access points. II. BACKGROUND 2. The Commission received a report from the National Telecommunication and Information Administration ("NTIA") indicating that Proxim's ORiNICO AP-4000 wireless access point ("AP-4000"), an unlicensed National Information Infrastructure ("U-NII") device operating in the frequency band 5.250-5.350 GHz, is not in compliance
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-147A1.html
  • 2009 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Inter Tech FM ("Inter Tech") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted apparent violation involves Inter Tech's marketing of an unauthorized FM broadcast transmitter. In addition, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of eleven thousand dollars ($11,000) against Inter Tech for providing to the Commission, during the course of this investigation, material factual information that is incorrect without a reasonable basis for believing the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1485A1.html
  • dba Vector Manufacturing, Ltd. ("Vector"), a wholly owned subsidiary of Black & Decker (U.S.A.) Inc. ("Black & Decker"), for marketing in the United States an unauthorized radio frequency device, the Vector iMobile VEC 429 FM transmitter ("Vector Transmitter" or "device"), in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803(a)(1), 2.926(e), and 15.239(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803(a)(1), 2.926(e), and 15.239(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On March 7, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") received a complaint regarding the manufacture and marketing of the Vector Transmitter, a Part 15 intentional radiator operating
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1513A1.html
  • 2009 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Inter Tech FM ("Inter Tech") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-two thousand dollars ($22,000) for willful and repeated violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted apparent violations involve Inter Tech's marketing of FM broadcast transmitters and external RF power amplifiers ("amplifiers") without proper authorization. II. background 2. In response to complaints alleging that Inter Tech was marketing unauthorized FM broadcast equipment in the United States, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Enforcement Bureau ("Division") began an investigation. As
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1535A1.html
  • the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order ("NAL"), we find LawMate Technology Co., Ltd. ("LawMate") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The apparent violation involves LawMate's marketing of unauthorized radio frequency devices. II. BACKGROUND 2. By letter of inquiry ("LOI") dated September, 19, 2007, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") initiated an investigation into whether LawMate had marketed non-compliant wireless video transmitter devices in the United States. In subsequent LOIs dated August 4, 2008,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1626A1.html
  • Re: File No. EB-08-SE-695 Dear Mr. Cleveland: This is an official CITATION, issued to Hobby Lobby International, Inc. ("HLI") pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), for marketing non-compliant radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803 and 15.209, and importing radio frequency devices without filing FCC Form 740 (or the electronic equivalent) with the United States Customs and Border Patrol in violation of Section 1.1203 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S: 1.1203. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1697A1.html
  • Division St., Suite 155 Spokane, WA 99218 Re: File No. EB-08-SE-602 Dear Mr. O'Harvey: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to The Spy Store, Inc. ("Spy Store") for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), and importing radio frequency devices without filing FCC Form 740 (or the electronic equivalent) with the United States Customs and Border Patrol in violation of Section 2.1203 of the Rules. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1772A1.html
  • Adelaide Way San Jose, CA 95124-5548 Re: File No. EB-08-SE-692 Dear Mr. Hirsch: This is an official CITATION issued to Future Hobbies pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States that operate on restricted frequencies in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In response to a complaint alleging that Future Hobbies was marketing unauthorized audio/video transmitters that are capable of operating on restricted frequencies in the 900 MHz and 2.4 GHz frequency bands, the Spectrum Enforcement
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1823A1.html
  • Re: File No. EB-09-SE-133 Dear Mr. Olin: This is an official CITATION issued to Costco Warehouse Corporation ("Costco"), pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), for marketing non-compliant radio frequency devices, specifically, the Astak CM-918T2 wireless security camera ("Astak CM-918T2), in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803, 15.209 and 15.249(d) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In March 2009, the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that the Astak CM-918T2 is causing harmful interference to Sprint Nextel's licensed operation of its iDEN network in the 800 MHz and 900
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1824A1.html
  • Re: File No. EB-09-SE-134 Dear Mr. Dach: This is an official CITATION issued to Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. ("Wal-Mart"), pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), for marketing non-compliant radio frequency devices, specifically, the Astak CM-918T2 wireless security camera ("Astak CM-918T2), in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803, 15.209 and 15.249(d) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In March 2009, the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that the Astak CM-918T2 is causing harmful interference to Sprint Nextel's licensed operation of its iDEN network in the 800 MHz and 900
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-182A1.html
  • the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Pro Tech Monitoring, Inc. ("Pro Tech"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation of Pro Tech by the Bureau for possible violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803(a) and 90.203 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") regarding the marketing and selling of a model of radio frequency transmitting equipment, specifically a Global Positioning System ("GPS") based tracking device. 2. The Bureau and Pro Tech have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1968A1.html
  • citation is punishable by fine or imprisonment. Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation. Sincerely, Kathryn Berthot Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division Enforcement Bureau Federal Communications Commission cc: Dean J Polales. Esq. Ungaretti & Harris, LLP 3500 Three First National Plaza Chicago , IL 60602 (312) 977-9206 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5). 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. S: 2.815(b). Section 2.803(e)(4) of the Rules defines "marketing" as the "sale or lease, or offering to sale or lease, including advertising for sale or lease, or importation, shipment or distribution for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease." 47 C.F.R. S: 2.803(e)(4). Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, to Eric
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-2103A1.html
  • the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Imation Corp. ("Imation"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Imation for possible violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803(a), 2.948(d), and 15.19(b) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803(a), 2.948(d), and 15.19(b), regarding the marketing and labeling of digital television ("DTV") converter boxes. 2. The Bureau and Imation have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-2216A1.html
  • Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Midland Radio Corporation. ("Midland"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL") by the Bureau against Midland for possible violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (the "Act"), and Section 2.803(g) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") regarding the marketing of General Mobile Radio Service (GMRS) transmitters equipped with voice scrambling technology. 2. The Bureau and Midland have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-2303A1.html
  • 29, 2009 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. By this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Richfield Electronics (China) Ltd. ("Richfield") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of eighteen thousand dollars ($18,000) for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted violations involve Richfield's marketing of equipment that did not comply with the emission limit of Section 15.239(b) of the Rules and the labeling requirements Section 2.925(a)(1) of the Rules. II. Background 2. In March 2008, the Commission's Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that the Whole House FM Transmitter ("WH Transmitter") exceeded the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-2374A1.html
  • 5, 2009 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Uniden America Corporation ("Uniden") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-three thousand dollars ($23,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and Section 2.803(g) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted apparent violations involve Uniden's marketing of non-compliant General Mobile Radio Service ("GMRS") transmitters. II. BACKGROUND 2. Section 95.183(a)(4) of the Rules prohibits GMRS operators from transmitting coded messages and messages with hidden meanings. The Enforcement Bureau's Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") received information indicating that Uniden was marketing GMRS transmitters equipped with voice scrambling
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-2383A1.html
  • 2009 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find R.F. Technologies, Inc. ("R.F. Technologies") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The apparent violation involves R.F. Technologies' marketing of an unauthorized radio frequency device. II. BACKGROUND 2. R.F. Technologies sells and services products, such as the RF400BP, that are designed for business drive-thru facilities. The RF400BP, a portable belt-pack transceiver, is connected to a headset and is typically worn by fast food restaurant employees to communicate
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-2426A1.html
  • No. EB-09-SE-136 Dear Mr. Hsia: This is an official CITATION, issued to Team Research, Inc. ("Team Research") pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), for marketing a non-compliant radio frequency device, specifically, the Astak CM-918T2 wireless security camera ("Astak CM-918T2"), in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803, 15.209 and 15.249(d) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In March 2009, the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that the Astak CM-918T2 is causing harmful interference to Sprint Nextel's licensed operation of its iDEN network in the 800 MHz and 900
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-2447A1.html
  • President & CEO Troxell Communications, Inc. 4830 S. 38th Street Phoenix, Arizona 85040 Re: File No. EB-09-SE-103 Dear Mr. Troxell: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), for marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject Troxell Communications, Inc. ("Troxell") to monetary forfeitures. On May 7, 2009, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau ("Division") received a complaint alleging that Troxell was marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device, namely the QRF600 interactive wireless audience response
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-2506A1.html
  • Weston, Florida 33327 Re: File No. EB-08-SE-099 Dear Mr. Roshberg: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to Creativewirelesssav.com d/b/a/ Creative Audio, Inc. ("Creative Audio") for marketing in the United States radiofrequency devices that operate on restricted frequencies, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry of inquiry ("LOI") dated August 22, 2008, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau ("Division") initiated an investigation into whether Creative Audio was marketing in the United States
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-253A1.html
  • Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order ("NAL"), we find Power 7 Technology Corporation ("Power 7") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The apparent violations involve Power 7's marketing of unauthorized radio frequency devices. II. BACKGROUND 2. In March 2008, the FCC's Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") received a complaint alleging that the emissions of the Macally FM Cup Automobile Full Channel FM Transmitter and iPOD Charger ("FM Cup Transmitter") exceed the limit specified in Section 15.239(b) of the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-2545A1.html
  • 7, 2009 Released: December 9, 2009 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Forfeiture Order ("Order"), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000) against XLNT Idea, Inc. ("XLNT Idea") for willful and repeated violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted violations involve the marketing of unauthorized digital devices in the United States. 2. On November 4, 2008, the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau ("Division") issued a Notice of Apparent Liability ("NAL") for Forfeiture to XLNT Idea in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000). XLNT Idea filed a response to the NAL
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-27A1.html
  • 16, 2009 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Silver Spring Networks ("Silver Spring"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau into whether Silver Spring violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.212(a)(vi)(A) of the Commission's rules ("Rules") regarding the marketing and labeling of a modular utility meter transmitter. 2. The Bureau and Silver Spring have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-407A1.html
  • Drive Ontario, CA 91761 Re: File No. EB-08-SE-531 Dear Mr. Chen: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), for marketing unauthorized and non-compliant radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.239(b) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803 and 15.239(b). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry ("LOI") dated June 18, 2008, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau initiated an investigation into whether Macally USA Mace Group, Inc.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-7A1.html
  • 2009 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Arkion Systems, LLC ("Arkion"). The Consent Decree is for the purpose of terminating the Bureau's investigation into whether Arkion violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803(a), 2.925 and 15.19 of the Commission's rules ("Rules") regarding the marketing and use of four models of utility meter transmitters. 2. The Bureau and Arkion have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-831A1.html
  • ProLingo pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), for marketing in the United States a radio frequency device, specifically, the Listentech LT700 transmitter, in a manner inconsistent with the terms of its authorization and the requirements of Section 15.237 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 15.237 of the Rules. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In response to a complaint alleging that ProLingo was marketing, as a component of its simultaneous language interpretation systems, certain transmitters that operate on frequencies in the 72-76 MHz band which are restricted under Section 15.237
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/FCC-09-25A1.html
  • ) FRN # 0012065009 FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: March 27, 2009 Released: March 31, 2009 By the Commission: 1. In this Forfeiture Order ("Order"), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) to Hawking Technologies, Inc. ("Hawking") for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.204(d) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The apparent violations involve marketing external radio frequency power amplifiers in a manner that was inconsistent with the terms of Hawking's equipment authorization and the requirements of Section 15.204(d) of the Rules. 2. On April 2, 2007, the Commission issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL") in the amount of $50,000
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-09-2623A1.html
  • Suffern, NY 10901-3834 Re: File No. EB-08-SE-142 Dear Mr. Lee: This is an official CITATION, issued to SCS Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Spy Camera Specialists, Inc. ("Spy Camera"), pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In March 2008, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Enforcement Bureau ("Division") received a complaint alleging that Spy Camera was marketing unauthorized wireless video transmitters that operate in the 1.08, 1.12, 1.16 and 1.2
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-1088A1.html
  • Head Boulevard Naples, FL 34110 Re: File No. EB-09-SE-124 Dear Mr. Kallstrom: This is an official CITATION, issued to USA Shutter Company, LLC, d/b/a MaestroShield, ("USA Shutter"), pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803 and 15.201 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In 2009, the Commission received a complaint alleging that USA Shutter was marketing unauthorized wireless remote control transmitters used to control window shutters. The complaint was referred to the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-1256A1.html
  • 6, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Wireless Extenders, Inc. ("Wi-Ex") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of four thousand dollars ($4,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted apparent violation involves Wi-Ex's marketing of radio frequency devices that are not labeled in accordance with Section 2.925(a)(1) of the Rules. II. BACKGROUND 2. The Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Wi-Ex was marketing a dual band cellular/PCS signal booster ("booster") that was labeled with FCC Identification number SO4YX510-PCS-CEL, an FCC ID
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-1257A1.html
  • July 6, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Cellphone-Mate Inc. ("Cellphone-Mate") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of four thousand dollars ($4,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted apparent violation involves Cellphone-Mate's marketing of radio frequency devices that are not labeled in accordance with Section 2.925(a)(1) of the Rules. II. BACKGROUND 2. The Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Cellphone-Mate's SureCall(TM) Model CM2000-WL dual band cellular/PCS signal amplifier ("amplifier) was labeled with FCC Identification number RSNDUAL-62UNDER, an FCC ID number
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-1321A1.html
  • 20, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Qomo HiteVision, LLC ("Qomo"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Qomo for possible violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.201(b) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") regarding the marketing of unauthorized radio frequency response systems. 2. The Bureau and Qomo have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-1511A1.html
  • August 27, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Kannad SAS ("Kannad"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Kannad for possible violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), regarding Kannad's marketing of 406.0-406.1 MHz emergency locator transmitters ("406 MHz ELTs") that were not labeled in accordance with Section 87.199(f) the Rules. 2. The Bureau and Kannad have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-1897A1.html
  • October 4, 2010 Released: October 4, 2010 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Callaway Golf Company ("Callaway"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau into whether Callaway violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803, 15.19, 15.31(j), and 15.107(a) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"), regarding the marketing of computer peripheral devices and a battery charger. 2. The Bureau and Callaway have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2187A1.html
  • 18, 2010 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to Wolf Seeberg Video for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). 2. Wolf Seeberg Video should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may subject your company to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of equipment, and criminal sanctions. II. background
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2188A1.html
  • 18, 2010 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to Able Cine Tech for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). 2. Able Cine Tech should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may subject your company to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of equipment, and criminal sanctions. II. background
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2189A1.html
  • the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to South Bay Film and Video Services for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). 2. South Bay Film and Video Services should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may subject your company to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of equipment, and criminal
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2220A1.html
  • 23, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), to Hobby Lobby International, Inc. ("HLI") for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). 2. HLI should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Rules in this regard may subject your company to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of equipment, and criminal sanctions. II. background 3. The Office
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2240A1.html
  • 2010 By the District Director, Columbia Office, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), to Jammer World/theJammerStore.com ("Jammer World") for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). 2. Jammer World should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Rules in this regard may subject your company to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of equipment, and criminal sanctions. II. background 3. On
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2290A1.html
  • December 8, 2010 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and RF Linx Corporation ("RF Linx"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against RF Linx for possible violations of section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and sections 2.803(a), 2.925, and 15.204(d)(1), (2) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"), regarding RF Linx's marketing of external radio frequency power amplifiers. 2. The Bureau and RF Linx have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2295A1.html
  • Released: December 6, 2010 By the District Director, Columbia Office, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), to Everbuying.com for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). 2. Everbuying.com should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Rules in this regard may subject your company to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of equipment, and criminal sanctions. II. background 3. On July
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-521A1.html
  • By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Enhanced Vision Systems, Inc. ("Enhanced Vision"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Enhanced Vision for possible violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Sections 2.803(a), 15.19, 15.21, and 15.105 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") regarding the marketing of Class B Digital Devices, specifically, vision assistance products for the legally blind. 2. The Bureau and Enhanced Vision have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-616A1.html
  • the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Motorola, Inc. ("Motorola"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Motorola for possible violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803(a), 2.926(e), 15.37(l), and 15.407(h) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803(a), 2.926(e), 15.37(l), and 15.407(h), regarding the marketing and labeling of Unlicensed National Information Infrastructure (U-NII) devices. 2. The Bureau and Motorola have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-618A1.html
  • 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Airspan Networks (Israel), Ltd. ("Airspan"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Airspan for possible violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803, 2.925, and 15. 407(h)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") regarding the marketing and selling of unlicensed National Information Infrastructure ("U-NII") devices. 2. The Bureau and Airspan have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-669A1.html
  • 20, 2010 Released: April 20, 2010 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Phonejammer.com ("Phonejammer") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty five thousand dollars ($25,000) for willful and repeated violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted apparent violations involve the marketing in the United States of radio frequency devices designed to intentionally interfere with licensed cellular and Personal Communications Services ("PCS"). II. BACKGROUND 2. On May 22, 2008, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") issued a Citation to Phonejammer pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-689A1.html
  • 23, 2010 Released: April 26, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Axxcelera Broadband Wireless, Inc. ("Axxcelera"). The Consent Decree terminates the Bureau's investigation into Axxcelera's possible violations of Section 302(b) the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 15.407(h)(2) of the Commission's Rules, regarding the marketing of unlicensed National Information Infrastructure ("U-NII") devices. 2. The Bureau and Axxcelera have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-7A1.html
  • 2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29416 Re: File No. EB-09-SE-087 Dear Mr. Wolf: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to MALAA GeoScience USA, Inc. ("MALAA") for marketing in the United States an unauthorized radio frequency device in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), and for importing a radio frequency device without filing FCC Form 740 (or the electronic equivalent) with the United States Customs and Border Patrol in violation of Section 2.1203 of the Rules. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In April of 2009,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-804A1.html
  • 2010 Released: May 14, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Entone, Inc. ("Entone"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau into whether Entone violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, ("Act"), and Sections 2.803(a), 2.925, 2.1074, 2.1204, and 15.19 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") regarding the marketing, labeling, and identification of unauthorized radio frequency devices. 2. The Bureau and Entone have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/FCC-09-107A1.html
  • this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Commission and San Jose Technology, Inc. (formerly known as San Jose Navigation, Inc.) (collectively "San Jose"). The Consent Decree terminates the Commission's enforcement proceeding regarding San Jose's compliance with the equipment requirements set forth in Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205 of the Commission's Rules. 2. The Commission and San Jose have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve this matter and terminate the enforcement proceeding. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. Based on the available facts related to this matter, we conclude that there are no substantial
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1164A1.html
  • Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), to New Generation Hobbies ("New Generation") for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices that operate on restricted frequencies in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the rules ("Rules") of the Federal Communications Commission ("Commission" or "FCC"). 2. New Generation should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Rules in this regard may subject your company to substantial monetary penalties, seizure
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1165A1.html
  • By the Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), to Sound Around Inc. ("Sound Around") for marketing in the United States radiofrequency devices that operate on restricted frequencies in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act and sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the rules ("Rules") of the Federal Communications Commission ("Commission"), and for marketing wireless microphones that are capable of operating in the 700 MHz band (698-806 MHz) in violation of section 74.851(g) of the Rules. 2. Sound Around should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct, including removing from display
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1188A1.html
  • Director, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") of the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC" or "Commission") and ReconRobotics, Inc. ("ReconRobotics"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau into whether ReconRobotics violated section 302a(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and section 2.803 of the Commission's rules ("Rules"), regarding the manufacturing, marketing, distributing, and selling of radio frequency transmitters. 2. The Bureau and ReconRobotics have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-125A1.html
  • January 26, 2011 By the Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), to DeadlyDeal.com ("Deadly Deal") for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and section 2.803 of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). 2. Deadly Deal should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Rules in this regard may subject your company to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of equipment and criminal sanctions. II. bACKGROUND 3. By
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-135A1.html
  • 26, 2011 By the Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), to Comtrex Communications Ltd. ("Comtrex") for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and section 2.803 of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). 2. Comtrex should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Rules in this regard may subject your company to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of equipment, and criminal sanctions. II. BACKGROUND 3. On June
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1468A1.html
  • Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Marshall Amplification PLC ("Marshall") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand two hundred dollars ($7,200) for its apparent willful and repeated violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and sections 2.803(a)(2) and 15.105(b) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). The noted apparent violations involve Marshall's marketing of a Class B digital audio radio frequency device in the United States without providing mandatory disclosures to consumers in the device's user manual. II. BACKGROUND 2. On July 12, 2010, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau issued a letter of inquiry to
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1661A1.html
  • Act"), to each of the companies listed in the caption to this Citation and in Appendix A attached hereto (each, an "Online Vendor," and collectively, the "Online Vendors") for marketing in the United States a total of 215 uniquely described models of cell, GPS, and other signal jamming devices in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act and sections 2.803 and 15.201(b) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). 2. Signal jamming devices pose significant risks to public safety and potentially compromise other radio communications services. Each Online Vendor must take immediate steps to cease marketing signal jamming devices to consumers in the United States and its territories and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. This may include actions such as
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1720A1.html
  • of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), to Spy Gallery, Inc. ("Spy Gallery") for marketing to consumers in the United States and its territories ("United States") unauthorized radio frequency devices - cell phone signal blockers and Global Positioning System ("GPS") signal jammers (collectively, "signal jamming devices") - in violation of section 302(b) of the Act, and sections 2.803 and 15.201(b) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). 2. Spy Gallery should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct, including actions such as removing illegal signal jamming devices from displays and declining to sell signal jamming devices in the United States. Signal jamming devices pose significant risks to public safety and potentially compromise
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1911A1.html
  • November 17, 2011 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Custom Interface Technologies, a Division of Thornstar Corporation ("CIT"), in Joshua Tree, California, willfully and repeatedly violated section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and sections 2.803(a)(1) and 74.851(f) of the Commission's rules ("Rules") by manufacturing and marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices. We conclude that CIT is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. In May and June, 2010, the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office ("Los Angeles Office") investigated allegations that uncertified video assist transmitters were being sold
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-246A1.html
  • Ltd. ("Shenzhen") to show cause why the equipment authorization it holds under FCC ID No. XRLTG-VIPJAMM should not be revoked and why a Forfeiture Order in an amount not to exceed one hundred and twelve thousand five hundred dollars ($112,500) should not be issued against Shenzhen for willfully and/or repeatedly violating sections 302(b) and 333 of the Act and sections 2.803, 2.907(b), 2.931, 2.932, 2.936 and 2.946 of the Rules. II. BACKGROUND 2. In response to complaints regarding the marketing of a radio frequency device called the TxTStopper(TM) that is advertised as preventing cell phone use in moving motor vehicles, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the FCC's Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") launched an investigation. The Division staff observed that the txtstopper.com
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-247A1.html
  • 2011 By the Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), to Share Enterprises Unlimited, Inc. ("Share") for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and section 2.803 of the Commission's rules ("Rules"), and for providing incorrect, material factual information to the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") in violation of section 1.17(a)(2) of the Rules. 2. Share should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-248A1.html
  • 2011 Released: February 9, 2011 By the Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), to DealExtreme for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"), and for failing to respond to Enforcement Bureau Letters of Inquiry ("LOIs") directing DealExtreme to provide certain information and documents. 2. DealExtreme should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. In addition, you must to respond to the Enforcement Bureau's June 12, 2009 LOI within
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-408A1.html
  • March 3, 2011 By the District Director, Los Angeles Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to SecurityMan, Inc. ("SecurityMan") for marketing non-compliant radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of section 302(b) of the Act, and section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's rules. 2. SecurityMan should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of equipment, and criminal sanctions. II. background 3. In December
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-5A1.html
  • the District Director, Detroit Office, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), to Doctor Radio's CB Shop ("Doctor Radio") for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). 2. Doctor Radio should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Rules in this regard may subject your company to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of equipment, and criminal sanctions. II. background 3. On
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-754A1.html
  • 2011 Released: April 28, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and PreSonus Audio Electronics, Inc. ("PreSonus"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Bureau regarding PreSonus's compliance with section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and sections 2.803, 2.1203, 15.19, and 15.105 of the Commission's rules ("Rules") pertaining to the marketing of unauthorized Class B digital audio radio frequency devices. 2. The Bureau and PreSonus have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that would resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-812A1.html
  • Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), to GadgetTown d/b/a GadgetTown.com ("GadgetTown") for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices - cell phone signal blockers and GPS signal jammers - in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and section 2.803 of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). 2. GadgetTown should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. These jamming devices pose significant risks to public safety and other radio communications services. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Rules in this regard may subject your company to
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-885A1.html
  • 19, 2011 Released: May 20, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Luxul Wireless, Inc. ("Luxul"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Bureau regarding Luxul's compliance with section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and sections 2.803(a), 2.925, and 15.204(d)(1), (2) of the Commission's rules ("Rules") pertaining to the marketing of external radio frequency power amplifiers. 2. The Bureau and Luxul have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that would resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-924A1.html
  • Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), to Pyong Kon Eun for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices - cell phone signal blockers and GPS signal jammers - in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and section 2.803 of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). 2. Pyong Kon Eun should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. These jamming devices pose significant risks to public safety and other radio communications services. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-976A1.html
  • 1, 2011 By the Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find SmartLabs, Inc. ("SmartLabs") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of ten thousand dollars ($10,000) for willful and repeated violations of section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). The apparent violations involve SmartLabs' marketing of an unauthorized radio frequency device. II. BACKGROUND 2. By letter of inquiry ("LOI") dated May 21, 2010, the Enforcement Bureau's Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") initiated an investigation into whether SmartLabs had marketed the INSTEON(R) RemoteLinc(TM) Wireless Remote Control Model #2440 ("RemoteLinc") prior to authorization of this device in
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-984A1.html
  • 1. This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), to Gary L. Stanford, d.b.a. Spark Gap CB Shop ("Spark Gap CB") for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices and external radio frequency power amplifiers in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and sections 2.803(a)(1) and 2.815(b) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). 2. Spark Gap CB should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Rules in this regard may subject you to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of equipment, and criminal sanctions. II. background
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-98A1.html
  • the District Director, Columbia Office, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), to New Century Technology Limited ("New Century") for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). 2. New Century should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below, and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Rules in this regard may subject your company to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of equipment, and criminal sanctions. II. background 3. On
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2012/DA-12-270A1.html
  • 2012 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (Bureau) of the Federal Communications Commission and American Music and Sound (AMS). The Consent Decree resolves and terminates the Bureau's investigation into AMS's compliance with Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (Act), and Sections 2.803, 2.1203, 15.19, 15.21, and 15.105 of the Commission's rules (Rules) pertaining to the marketing of unauthorized Class A digital audio radio frequency devices. 2. The Bureau and AMS have negotiated the Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2012/DA-12-360A1.html
  • the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (Bureau) of the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) and ETI Sound Systems, Inc. (ETI). The Consent Decree resolves and terminates the Bureau's investigation into ETI's compliance with Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the Act), and Sections 2.803, 2.1203, 15.19, 15.21, and 15.105 of the Commission's rules (Rules) pertaining to the marketing of digital radio frequency devices, including guitar amplifiers, CD/MP3 players, and active speaker systems. 2. The Bureau and ETI have negotiated the Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 3. After reviewing the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2012/DA-12-42A1.html
  • By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") of the Federal Communications Commission ("Commission") and Hawking Technologies, Inc. ("Hawking"). The Consent Decree settles an enforcement proceeding against Hawking regarding Hawking's compliance with section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the "Act"), and sections 2.803(a) and 15.204(d) of the Commission's rules in connection with its marketing of certain external radio frequency power amplifiers. 2. The Bureau and Hawking have negotiated the Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2012/DA-12-574A1.html
  • In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (Bureau) of the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) and Richard Mann d/b/a The Antique Radio Collector (Mr. Mann). The Consent Decree settles an enforcement proceeding regarding Mr. Mann's willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (Act), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's rules (Rules) in connection with the marketing in the United States of uncertified AM radio transmitters assembled from kits. 2. The Bureau and Mr. Mann have negotiated the Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2012/DA-12-63A1.html
  • Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order (NAL), we find US Jetting, Inc. (US Jetting) apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of eight thousand four hundred dollars ($8,400) for its apparent willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (Act), and Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 15.201(b) of the Commission's rules (Rules). The noted apparent violations involve US Jetting's marketing of radio frequency devices in the United States prior to obtaining Commission authorization for such devices. Further, we order US Jetting to submit a statement signed under penalty of perjury by an officer or director of the company stating that it is no longer marketing
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2012/DA-12-745A1.html
  • Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. On November 27, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division (Division) of the Enforcement Bureau (Bureau) issued a Forfeiture Order against Richard Mann d/b/a The Antique Radio Collector (Mr. Mann), assessing a forfeiture in the amount of $7,000 for the willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (Act), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's rules (Rules) in connection with the marketing in the United States of uncertified AM radio transmitters assembled from kits. On December 27, 2007, Mr. Mann filed an Appeal of Forfeiture Order in which he sought cancellation or reduction of the forfeiture. On April 30, 2008, the Bureau released the Reconsideration Order, which affirmed the Forfeiture Order and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/da002090.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/da002090.txt
  • September 14, 2000 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Memorandum Opinion and Order (``Order''), we deny The Two Way Shop's Petition for Reconsideration of the $7,000 Forfeiture Order that we issued to it on April 7, 2000. The Two Way Shop willfully and repeatedly violated Section 302 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803 and 2.815 of the Commission's Rules by offering linear amplifiers for sale. 2. In a letter dated May 3, 2000, the Two Way Shop responded to the Forfeiture Order. We will treat the May 3, 2000 letter as a Petition for Reconsideration of the Forfeiture Order. 3. The Two Way Shop raises one new issue in its Petition for Reconsideration.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/da002810.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/da002810.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/da002810.txt
  • � 302. 47 C.F.R. � 2.907. Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, NAL/No. X3248003 (Enf. Bur., Atlanta Office, released May 9, 2000). FCC Identifier NX3SKY2000. The grant was originally issued on August 18, 1998, and was updated to reflect a modification of the device on July 13, 1999. 47 C.F.R. � 15.239. 47 U.S.C. � 302(b) and 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(a)(1). See 47 C.F.R. � 2.907. Section 312(f)(1) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 312(f)(1), which also applies to Section 503(b) of the Act, provides: ``the term `willful,' when used with reference to the commission or omission of any act, means the conscious and deliberate commission or omission of such act, irrespective of any intent to violate any provision of this
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/da002915.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/da002915.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/da002915.txt
  • Louisiana ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File Number EB-00-OR-104 NAL/Acct. No. X3262010 FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: December 28, 2000 Released: December 29, 2000 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) against Stephen Fowler d/b/a Exports R Us, for willfully violating Sections 2.803 and 2.815 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by marketing an unauthorized external frequency power amplifier. On September 28, 2000, the Commission's New Orleans, Louisiana Field Office issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Stephen Fowler d/b/a Exports R Us. Stephen Fowler d/b/a Exports R Us has not filed a response.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/da00475.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/da00475.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/da00475.txt
  • Bureau: 1. This order imposes a forfeiture against Leslie D. Brewer, d/b/a/ L.D. Brewer's 2-way Radio (collectively, ``Mr. Brewer''), in the amount of $10,000, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``the Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (``the Rules''), 47 C.F.R. � 1.80, for willful violation of Sections 2.803(a)(1), and 15.201(b) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803(a)(1), and 15.201(b). These violations are based on the marketing of a transmitter not authorized by the Commission. The transmitter at issue was sold to an undercover agent of the Commission's Tampa, Florida Field Office. BACKGROUND 2. In early 1997, an agent from the Tampa Field Office visited L.D. Brewer's 2-Way Radio
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/da00579.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/da00579.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/da00579.txt
  • 14, 1999, by Cellular Systems Northwest, Inc. (``Northwest''). Northwest seeks reconsideration of the Forfeiture Order released March 15, 1999, in which the former Compliance and Information Bureau (``Bureau'') found it liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of $7,000 for willful and repeated violations of Section 302 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``the Act'') and Sections 2.803 and 2.815 of the Commission's Rules (``the Rules'') relating to the sale of transmitting equipment. For the reasons discussed below, we deny the petition for reconsideration and affirm the monetary forfeiture of $7,000. BACKGROUND 2. Northwest is a consumer electronics dealer in Enumclaw, Washington. On July 9, 1997, Northwest sold and offered to sell external radio frequency power amplifiers --
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/da00765.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/da00765.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/da00765.txt
  • Adopted: April 6, 2000 Released: April 7, 2000 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) against the Two Way Shop (``Two Way'') for willful and repeated violations of Section 302 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803 and 2.815 of the of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). These violations involve Two Way's offer for sale of linear amplifiers capable of operation in the 26.965 to 27.405 MHz frequency band. On July 14, 1999, the Commission's Seattle, Washington, Field Office, issued the referenced Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-02-1367A1.html
  • 1.903 (Authorization Required). San Diego, CA District Office (5/17/02). * Mount Rushmore Broadcasting, Inc., KAWK(FM), Custer, SD. $10,000 NAL. Denver, CO District Office (5/31/02). * California Speedway, Fontana, CA. $10,000 NAL. Los Angeles, CA District Office (5/30/02). * 47 U.S.C. 302 - Devices Which Interfere With Radio Reception * Lightning Electronics, Inc., Miami, FL. $7,000 NAL. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. 2.803 (Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization). Tampa, FL District Office (5/21/02). 47 C.F.R. Part 11 Emergency Alert System Rules * 47 C.F.R. 11.35 Equipment Operational Readiness * Fenix Broadcasting Corp., Miami, FL. $21,000 NAL. Other violations: 47 C.F.R. 17.51 (Time When Lights Should Be Exhibited) and 73.49 (AM Transmission System Fencing Requirements). Tampa, FL District Office (5/7/02).
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-02-197A1.html
  • Services * 47 C.F.R. 95.410 (CB Rule 10) How Much Power May I Use? * Emerson Owerns, Detroit, MI. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. 95.411 ((CB Rule 11) May I Use Power Amplifiers?). Detroit, MI District Office (12/14/01). CITATIONS Communications Act * 47 U.S.C. 302 Devices Which Interfere With Radio Reception * TravelCenters of America, Arvin, CA. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. 2.803 (Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization). Los Angeles, CA District Office (12/3/01). * TravelCenters of America, Buttonwillow, CA. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. 2.803 (Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization). Los Angeles, CA District Office (12/3/01). * ABC Phone, Brooklyn, NY. New York, NY District Office (12/5/01). * Beeper Street, Chris Bruner, Somerville, NJ. New
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-02-402A1.html
  • PA. $10,000 NAL. Philadelphia, PA District Office (1/10/02). * Rev. Dr. Philius Nicholas, Brooklyn, NY. $10,000 NAL. New York, NY District Office (1/10/02). * Thomas A. Brothers, Berkley, MI. $11,000 NAL. Detroit, MI District Office (1/14/02). * CTI of Miami, Inc., Miami, FL. $ 17,000 NAL. Other violations: 47 U.S.C. 302a (Devices Which Interfere With Radio Reception) and 47 C.F.R. 2.803 (Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization). Tampa, FL District Office (1/24/02). 47 C.F.R. Part 73 Radio Broadcast Services * 47 C.F.R. 73.3538 Application to Make Changes in an Existing Station * ACS Television LLC, Eagle River, AK. $13,000 NAL. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. 74.780 (Broadcast Regulations Applicable to Translators, Low Power, and Booster Stations). Anchorage, AK Resident
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-02-724A1.html
  • PA District Office (2/1/02). * AmeriPage Wireless, Lakewood, CA. Los Angeles, CA District Office (2/4/02). * Get Connected, Los Angeles, CA. Los Angeles, CA District Office (2/4/02). * National Cellular, Brooklyn NY. New York, NY District Office (2/4/02). * Power Cell, La Puente, CA. Los Angeles, CA District Office (2/4/02). * Delconn Wireless Products, Anaheim, CA. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. 2.803 (Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization). Los Angeles, CA District Office (2/5/02). * Mr. Mahmoud Salem, Stockton, CA. San Francisco, CA District Office (2/6/02). * The Cell Gallery, Tracy, CA. San Francisco, CA District Office (2/6/02). * Blue Rock Wireless, Inc., MS. New Orleans, LA District Office (2/7/02). * Wireless Dimensions, Inc., McLean, VA. Columbia, MD District
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-02-929A1.html
  • Office (3/18/02). CITATIONS Communications Act * 47 U.S.C. 302 Devices Which Interfere With Radio Reception * Abie Hamideh d.b.a. Planet Wireless, Garland, TX. Dallas, TX District Office (3/4/02). * Salena Kinney, Earl Troutman, and Rigo Ochoa d.b.a. Arken Communications, Plano, TX. Dallas, TX District Office (3/4/02). * Mr. Michael B. Faulkner, Express Electronics Inc., Longview, TX. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. 2.803 (Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization). Dallas, TX District Office (3/5/02). * Pilot Travel Center #282, Barstow, CA. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. 2.803 (Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization). Los Angeles, CA District Office (3/5/02). * Pilot Travel Center, North Las Vegas, NV. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. 2.803 (Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-03-2923A1.html
  • significantly exceed the Part 15 emission limits, they present a serious potential for harmful interference to licensed radio services. The Enforcement Bureau is considering appropriate enforcement action against Vector for importing and marketing radio frequency devices that do not comply with the FCC's technical standards in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 2.803(a) of the Rules. This public notice is intended to warn retailers that continued marketing of the six models of Vector battery chargers referenced above will constitute a violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a) of the Rules and may result in sanctions, including monetary forfeitures. For further information contact Suzanne Tetreault at 202-418-7450 or Kathy Berthot at
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-05-1776A1.html
  • cellular jammers suggest that the devices may be used on commuter trains, in theaters, hotels, restaurants and other locations the public frequents. The Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and the FCC rules prohibit the manufacture, importation, marketing, sale or operation of these devices within the United States (See Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 USC 302a(b) and Section 2.803(a) of the FCC's rules, 47 CFR 2.803(a)). In addition, it is unlawful for any person to willfully or maliciously interfere with the radio communications of any station licensed or authorized under the Act or operated by the U.S. Government (See Section 333 of the Communications Act, 47 USC 333). Further, Section 301 of the Act, 47 USC 301, requires persons
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-11-249A1.html
  • actions is available at www.fcc.gov/eb/jammerenforcement. What is Prohibited? Federal law prohibits the manufacture, marketing, and operation of jammers in the United States. As to operation, section 333 of the Communications Act prohibits "willful or malicious" interference to authorized radio communications, and thus prohibits the operation of jammers. As to manufacture and marketing, section 302(b) of the Communications Act and section 2.803 of the Commission's rules prohibit the manufacture, import, sale, offer for sale, or shipment of devices that do not comply with the FCC's rules. In turn, the FCC prohibits the marketing of radio frequency devices in the United States unless the devices are properly authorized or meet other applicable requirements. Jammers, by definition, can never be authorized because they are
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da001683.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da001683.html
  • Inc., Walled Lake, MI. Detroit, MI District Office (6/12/00). Transport One, Inc., d/b/a Imperial Car Service, Long Island City, NY, WPMK-242. New York, NY District Office (6/19/00). Cox Communications, KNNB712, Atlanta, GA. Boston, MA District Office (6/23/00). CITATIONS Communications Act 47 U.S.C. � 302 - Devices Which Interfere With Radio Reception Westell, Inc., Aurora, IL. Other violations: 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803 (Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization) and 15.19 (Labelling Requirements). Chicago, IL District Office (6/21/00). 47 C.F.R. Part 15 - Radio Frequency Devices 47 C.F.R. � 15.109 - Radiated Emission Limits Ramada Inn, New Port Richey, FL. Tampa, FL District Office (6/19/00). 2 q s y z } � � � � $ $ � � |�
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da001850.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da001850.html
  • Requirements). Denver, CO District Office (7/21/00). 47 C.F.R. � 90.425 - Station Identification Monsey New Square Trails Corporation, WPJH-744, Alpine, NJ. New York, NY District Office (7/6/00). Fernando Nuesi, d.b.a.Atlantic Car Service, WPMS-544, Brooklyn, NY. New York, NY District Office (7/7/00). CITATIONS 47 C.F.R. Part 2 - Frequency Allocations and Radio Treaty Matters; General Rules and Regulations 47 C.F.R. � 2.803 - Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization Xended Camera Support, Inc., St. Paul, MN. Other violations: 47 C.F.R. �� 2.925 (Identification of Equipment), 2.926 (FCC Identifier), and 15.101 (Equipment Authorization of Unintended Radiators). Los Angeles, CA District Office (7/10/00). Digital Cinema Products Corp., Huntington Beach, CA. Other violations: 47 C.F.R. �� 2.925 (Identification of Equipment), 2.926 (FCC
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da002136.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da002136.html
  • Detroit, MI District Office (8/15/00). Lucas G. Heartsill, San Angelo, TX. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. � 97.119(Station Identification). Detroit, MI District Office (8/15/00) Nancy B. Heartsill, San Angelo, TX. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. � 97.119(Station Identification). Detroit, MI District Office (8/15/00) CITATIONS 47 C.F.R. Part 2 - Frequency Allocations and Radio Treaty Matters; General Rules and Regulations 47 C.F.R. � 2.803 - Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization Tansvideo, North Hollywood, CA. Los Angeles, CA District Office (8/4/00). Electronics Unlimited, Frederick, MD. Columbia, MD District Office (8/16/00). % & W Y � � � $ $ % & X Y F X |� ��PNG �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� �� � �a�% Tf(c) U~��Uy�Ӛ�o=�c� {�YAD
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da002408.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da002408.html
  • with the instructions and by the deadline set forth in the NAL, NOV or Citation. NOTICES OF APPARENT LIABILITY Communications Act 47 U.S.C. � 301 - Unlicensed Operation Hormigonera Chaparro Inc. Aguada, PR. $5,000 NAL. San Juan, PR Resident Agent Office (9/26/00). 47 C.F.R. Part 2 - Frequency Allocations and Radio Treaty Matters; General Rules and Regulations 47 C.F.R. � 2.803 - Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization Stephen Fowler d/b/a Exports R Us., Pineville LA. $7,000 NAL. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. � 2.815 (External Radio Frequency Power Amplifiers). New Orleans, LA District Office (9/28/00). 47 C.F.R. Part 17 - Construction, Marking and Lighting of Antenna Structures 47 C.F.R. � 17.4 - Antenna Structure Registration Natchez Communications, Inc.,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da002635.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da002635.html
  • VA Resident Agent Office (10/19/00). 47 C.F.R. � 17.51 - Time When Lights Should Be Exhibited Netcom Technologies, Inc. San Juan, PR. $13,000 NAL. San Juan, PR Resident Agent Office (10/20/00). NOTICES OF VIOLATION Communications Act 47 U.S.C. � 302a - Devices Which Interfere With Radio Reception Mikes CB Sales and Service, Green Bay, WI. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior To Equipment Authorization). Chicago, IL District Office (10/4/00). 47 C.F.R. Part 1 - Practice and Procedure 47 C.F.R. � 1.89 - Notice of Violation Schindler Elevator Corp., KNGK438, Morristown, NJ. Boston, MA District Office (10/18/00). Route 66 Broadcasting Company, Santa Rosa, New Mexico. Denver, CO District Office (10/26/00). 47 C.F.R. � 1.903 - Authorization Required
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da00813.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da00813.html
  • Lakeland, FL. NOV also issued for violation of 47 C.F.R. � 95.411. Tampa, FL Office (3/28/00). Edward Mills, St. Augustine, FL. Tampa, FL Office (3/28/00). 47 C.F.R. Part 97 (Amateur Radio Service) 47 C.F.R. � 97.307 (Emission Standards) Lawrence C. Metzger, Bordentown, N2GBK, Pittsburgh, PA. Philadelphia, PA Office (3/16/00). CITATIONS Communications Act 47 U.S.C. � 302 and/or 47 C.F.R. � 2.803 (sale and marketing of non-certified equipment) National Wholesale Liquidators, Inc., Flushing, NY. New York, NY Office (3/14/00). Electronic Wonders Computers & Digital Imaging, New York, NY. New York, NY Office (3/21/00). T.P. Electronics, Chicago, IL. Chicago, IL Office (3/23/00). | $ $ $ { | ��PNG �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� �� � �a�% Tf(c) U~��Uy�Ӛ�o=�c� {�YAD
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da011019.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da011019.html
  • Operating Requirements). Denver, CO District Office (3/15/01). 47 C.F.R. � 90.403 - General Operating Requirements Atlantic Wireless, Inc, WPMM-224, Rochelle Park, NJ. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. � 90.425 (Station Identification). New York, NY District Office (3/30/01). CITATIONS Communications Act 47 U.S.C. � 302 - Devices Which Interfere With Radio Reception CTI of Miami, Miami, FL. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. � 2.803 (Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization) . Miami, FL Resident Agent Office (3/26/01). CANCELLED NOTICES OF VIOLATION Western Wireless Corporation, Bellevue, WA. Saint Paul, MN Resident Agent Office (1/16/01). Cancelled 1/24/01. ) e g - $ $ ( ) f g � F � � � � ��PNG �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� ��
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da011314.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da011314.html
  • WV. Other violations: 47 C.F.R. �� 95.410 ((CB Rule 10) How Much Power May I Use?) and 95.411 ((CB Rule 11) May I Use Power Amplifiers?). Columbia, MD District Office (4/11/01). Steve Wheeler, JR, Berlin, MD. Columbia, MD District Office (4/26/01). CITATIONS 47 C.F.R. Part 2 - Frequency Allocation and Radio Treaty Matters; General Rules and Regulations 47 C.F.R. � 2.803 - Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization A.R.Cellular Accessories, Inc, Brooklyn NY. Philadelphia, PA District Office (4/9/01). Innovision Optics, Santa Monica, CA. Other violations: 47 C.F.R. �� 2.925 (Identification of Equipment) and 2.926 (FCC Identifier) and 15.201 (Equipment Authorization Requirement). Los Angeles, CA District Office (4/17/01). 47 C.F.R. Part 15 - Radio Frequency Devices 47 C.F.R. �
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da011644.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da011644.html
  • C. Colflesh, Willards, MD. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. � 95.411 ((CB Rule 11) May I Use Power Amplifiers?). Columbia, MD District Office (5/9/01). CITATIONS Communications Act 47 U.S.C. � 302 - Devices Which Interfere With Radio Reception First Choice Wireless, LLC, Lake Mary, FL. Tampa, FL District Office (5/8/01). High Tech CB Shop, Jacksonville, FL. Other violations: 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803 (Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization) and 2.815 (External Radio Frequency Power Amplifiers). Tampa, FL District Office (5/9/01). White Diamond Communications, Inc., San Juan, PR. San Juan, PR Resident Agent Office (5/14/01). Cell-Station, Inc., Oldsmar, FL. Tampa, FL District Office (5/22/01). 47 C.F.R. Part 15 - Radio Frequency Devices 47 C.F.R. � 15.204 - External Radio Frequency
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da012031.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da012031.html
  • and Associated Control Equipment The Original Company, Inc., WBTO-FM, Petersburg, IN. $5,000 NAL. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. � 17.48 (Notification of Extinguishment or Improper Functioning of Lights). Chicago, IL District Office (7/3/01). NOTICES OF VIOLATION Communications Act 47 U,S.C. � 302 - Devices Which Interfere With Radio Reception Fifties Inc. d.b.a. Fifties Communications, San Juan, PR. Other violation: 47 C.F.R.� 2.803 (Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization). San Juan, PR Resident Agent Office (7/23/01). 47 C.F.R. Part 1 - Practice and Procedure 47 C.F.R. � 1.923 - Content of Applications Electronic Communications of WV Inc., WNQE563, NQE723, WNSS299 WPHM360, WPQA433 and ASR# 103090, Kopperston, WV. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. � 17.4(g) (Posting of Antenna Structure Registration Numbers). Columbia,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da012273.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da012273.pdf
  • Use? * Angel Guillermety, Levttown, PR. San Juan, PR Resident Agent Office (8/23/01). * 47 C.F.R. 95.413 (CB Rule 13) What Communcations Are Prohibited? * The Truck Wash, West Memphis, AR. New Orleans, LA District Office (8/2/01). CITATIONS Communications Act * 47 U.S.C. 302 Devices Which Interfere With Radio Reception * Custom Electronics, Witt Springs, AR. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. 2.803 (Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization). New Orleans, LA District Office (8/30/01) References 1. http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da012273.pdf 2. http://www.fcc.gov/ 3. ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da012540.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da012540.pdf
  • Brooklyn, NY. New York, NY District Office (9/4/01). * K & T Photo Electronics, Flushing, NY. New York, NY District Office (9/4/01). * Jade Mountain, Boulder, CO. Denver, CO District Office (9/5/01). * Deer 1 Electronics, Tampa, FL. Tampa, FL District Office (9/25/01). 47 C.F.R. Part 2 Frequency Allocation and Radio Treaty Matters; General Rules and Regulations * 47 C.F.R. 2.803 Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization * TRUCK-N-TRAVEL, Coburg, Oregon. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. 15.101(Equipment Authorization of Unintentional Radiators). Portland, OR Resident Agent Office (9/17/01). 47 C.F.R. Part 15 Radio Frequency Devices * 47 C.F.R. 15.5 General Conditions of Operation * Impact Video, Las Vegas, Nevada. Seattle, WA District Office (9/28/01). * 47 C.F.R. 15.109 Radiated Emission
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da012818.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da012818.pdf
  • to a NAL or to file a response to a NOV or Citation must do so in accordance with the instructions and by the deadline set forth in the NAL, NOV or Citation. NOTICES OF APPARENT LIABILITY Communications Act * 47 U.S.C. 302a Devices Which Interfere With Radio Reception * Electronic Unlimited, Miami, FL. $7,000 NAL Other violation: 47 C.F.R. 2.803 (Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization). Tampa, FL District Office (10/23/01). * Lightning Electronics, Inc., Miami, FL. $7,000 NAL. Other violations: 47 C.F.R. 2.803 (Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization). Tampa, FL District Office (10/29/01). * New Image Electronics, Miami, FL. $7,000 NAL. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. 2.803 (Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da012948.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da012948.pdf
  • Service * 47 C.F.R. 97.103 Station Licensee Responsibilities * Stanley Clewett KF6IKC, Redding, CA. San Francisco, CA District Office (11/21/01). Terms of Station Authorization * First State Bank, Socorro, NM (WNFT448). Denver, CO District Office (11/7/01). CITATIONS Communications Act * 47 U.S.C. 302 Devices Which Interfere With Radio Reception * TravelCenters of America, Inc., Troutdale, Oregon. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. 2.803 (Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization). Portland, OR Resident Agent Office (11/19/01). * TravelCenters of America, Inc., Aurora, Oregon. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. 2.803 (Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization). Portland, OR Resident Agent Office (11/19/01). * American PCS, New York, NY. New York, NY District Office (11/20/01). * A I Telecom, Inc., Niles,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/fees/2000oetguide.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/fees/2000oetguide.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/fees/2000oetguide.txt
  • of the USA, use 999999999 as the TIN or SSN. o EQUIPMENT AUTHORIZATION PROCEDURES The equipment approval of a radio frequency device may be covered by ``Certification.'' 1/ Marketing and/or importing equipment in the United States that is subject to Certification prior to the issuance of a Grant of Equipment Authorization (FCC Form 731A) is prohibited by 47 CFR, Section 2.803 of the rules and Section 302 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (The Act). Violation of the rules and the Act may subject the violator to the fines and forfeitures specified in Sections 501 and 503 of the Act. -B1- o APPLICANT FOR EQUIPMENT AUTHORIZATION The applicant for equipment authorization should be a party who can accept the
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/11/releases/bip_def.pdf
  • substantially complied with applicable Commission rules, policies and the Communications Act. Subpart C -- Technical Standards Sec. 24.50 Scope. This subpart sets forth the technical requirements for use of the spectrum and equipment in the personal communications services. Sec. 24.51 Equipment authorization. (a) Each transmitter utilized for operation under this part and each transmitter marketed, as set forth in � 2.803 of this chapter, must be of a type that has been authorized by the Commission under its type acceptance procedure for use under this part. (b) The Commission periodically publishes a list of type accepted equipment, entitled "Radio Equipment List, Equipment Accepted for Licensing." Copies of this list are available for public reference at the Commission's offices in Washington, D.C.,
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/fo9750.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/fo9750.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/fo9750.wp
  • license term for a partitioned license area and for disaggregated spectrum shall be the remainder of the original licensee's license term as provided for in section 27.13. Subpart C -- Technical Standards Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-50 27 � 27.51 Equipment authorization. (a) Each transmitter utilized for operation under this part and each transmitter marketed, as set forth in section 2.803 of this chapter, must be of a type that has been authorized by the Commission under its type acceptance procedure. (b) The Commission periodically publishes a list of type accepted equipment, entitled "Radio Equipment List, Equipment Accepted for Licensing." Copies of this list are available for public reference at the Commission's offices in Washington, D.C., at each of its field
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/wcsbip.pdf
  • By a factor remainder of the original licensee's license term as not less than 80 + 10 log (p) dB on all frequencies provided for in section 27.13. between 2320 and 2345 MHz. Subpart C -- Technical Standards Sec. 27.51 Equipment authorization. (a) Each transmitter utilized for operation under this part and each transmitter marketed, as set forth in section 2.803 of this chapter, must be of a type that has been authorized by the Commission under its type acceptance procedure. (b) The Commission periodically publishes a list of type accepted equipment, entitled "Radio Equipment List, Equipment Accepted for Licensing." Copies of this list are available for public reference at the Commission's offices in Washington, D.C., at each of its field
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/19/releases/fc950319.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/19/releases/fc950319.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/19/releases/fc950319.wp
  • service which is sound, favorable, and substantially above a level of mediocre service which might just minimally warrant renewal; and (b) Has substantially complied with applicable Commission rules, policies and the Communications Act. Subpart C -- Technical Standards � 26.51 Equipment authorization. (a) Each transmitter utilized for operation under this part and each transmitter marketed, as set forth in � 2.803 of this chapter, must be of a type that has been authorized by the Commission under its type acceptance procedure. (b) The Commission periodically publishes a list of type accepted equipment, entitled "Radio Equipment List, Equipment Accepted for Licensing." Copies of this list are available for public reference at the Commission's offices in Washington, D.C., at each of its field
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/22/releases/pcsbipg.pdf
  • (b) Has substantially complied with applicable Commission rules, policies and the Communications Act. SUBPART C--TECHNICAL STANDARDS � 24.50 Scope. This subpart sets forth the technical requirements for use of the spectrum and equipment in the personal communications services. � 24.51 Equipment authorization. (a) Each transmitter utilized for operation under this part and each transmitter marketed, as set forth in � 2.803 of this chapter, must be of a type that has been authorized by the Commission under its certification procedure for use under this part. (b) Any manufacturer of radio transmitting equipment to be used in these services may request equipment authorization following the procedures set forth in subpart J of part 2 of this chapter. Equipment authorization for an individual
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Enforcement/News_Releases/2000/brewer.html
  • BUREAU FINES FLORIDA MAN $10,000 FOR MARKETING UNAUTHORIZED RADIO EQUIPMENT WASHINGTON, D.C. - Today, the Enforcement Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission issued a Forfeiture Order imposing a $10,000 forfeiture against Leslie D. Brewer and his company, Leslie D. Brewer's 2-Way Radio. The fine was imposed for the sale of an unauthorized FM radio transmitter in willful violation of Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 15.201(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a)(1), and 15.201(b). Mr. Brewer sold a fully assembled, 20-watt transmitter capable of operating in the FM frequency band to an undercover Commission agent. The transmitter was not authorized by the Commission, and had no FCC identifier number affixed to it. Mr. Brewer was previously involved in the operation of an unauthorized
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Enforcement/Orders/2000/da000475.doc
  • Bureau: 1. This order imposes a forfeiture against Leslie D. Brewer, d/b/a/ L.D. Brewer's 2-way Radio (collectively, ``Mr. Brewer''), in the amount of $10,000, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``the Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (``the Rules''), 47 C.F.R. � 1.80, for willful violation of Sections 2.803(a)(1), and 15.201(b) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803(a)(1), and 15.201(b). These violations are based on the marketing of a transmitter not authorized by the Commission. The transmitter at issue was sold to an undercover agent of the Commission's Tampa, Florida Field Office. BACKGROUND 2. In early 1997, an agent from the Tampa Field Office visited L.D. Brewer's 2-Way Radio
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Enforcement/Orders/2000/da000579.doc
  • 14, 1999, by Cellular Systems Northwest, Inc. (``Northwest''). Northwest seeks reconsideration of the Forfeiture Order released March 15, 1999, in which the former Compliance and Information Bureau (``Bureau'') found it liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of $7,000 for willful and repeated violations of Section 302 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``the Act'') and Sections 2.803 and 2.815 of the Commission's Rules (``the Rules'') relating to the sale of transmitting equipment. For the reasons discussed below, we deny the petition for reconsideration and affirm the monetary forfeiture of $7,000. BACKGROUND 2. Northwest is a consumer electronics dealer in Enumclaw, Washington. On July 9, 1997, Northwest sold and offered to sell external radio frequency power amplifiers --
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Enforcement/Orders/2000/da000765.doc
  • Adopted: April 6, 2000 Released: April 7, 2000 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) against the Two Way Shop (``Two Way'') for willful and repeated violations of Section 302 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803 and 2.815 of the of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). These violations involve Two Way's offer for sale of linear amplifiers capable of operation in the 26.965 to 27.405 MHz frequency band. On July 14, 1999, the Commission's Seattle, Washington, Field Office, issued the referenced Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Enforcement/Orders/2000/da000814.doc
  • Lakeland, FL. NOV also issued for violation of 47 C.F.R. � 95.411. Tampa, FL Office (3/28/00). Edward Mills, St. Augustine, FL. Tampa, FL Office (3/28/00). 47 C.F.R. Part 97 (Amateur Radio Service) 47 C.F.R. � 97.307 (Emission Standards) Lawrence C. Metzger, Bordentown, N2GBK, Pittsburgh, PA. Philadelphia, PA Office (3/16/00). CITATIONS Communications Act 47 U.S.C. � 302 and/or 47 C.F.R. � 2.803 (sale and marketing of non-certified equipment) National Wholesale Liquidators, Inc., Flushing, NY. New York, NY Office (3/14/00). Electronic Wonders Computers & Digital Imaging, New York, NY. New York, NY Office (3/21/00). T.P. Electronics, Chicago, IL. Chicago, IL Office (3/23/00). � � $ $ $ � � ��PNG �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� �� � �a�% Tf(c) U~��Uy�Ӛ�o=�c�
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Enforcement/Orders/2000/da002090.doc
  • September 14, 2000 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Memorandum Opinion and Order (``Order''), we deny The Two Way Shop's Petition for Reconsideration of the $7,000 Forfeiture Order that we issued to it on April 7, 2000. The Two Way Shop willfully and repeatedly violated Section 302 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803 and 2.815 of the Commission's Rules by offering linear amplifiers for sale. 2. In a letter dated May 3, 2000, the Two Way Shop responded to the Forfeiture Order. We will treat the May 3, 2000 letter as a Petition for Reconsideration of the Forfeiture Order. 3. The Two Way Shop raises one new issue in its Petition for Reconsideration.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Enforcement/Public_Notices/2000/da000813.doc
  • Lakeland, FL. NOV also issued for violation of 47 C.F.R. � 95.411. Tampa, FL Office (3/28/00). Edward Mills, St. Augustine, FL. Tampa, FL Office (3/28/00). 47 C.F.R. Part 97 (Amateur Radio Service) 47 C.F.R. � 97.307 (Emission Standards) Lawrence C. Metzger, Bordentown, N2GBK, Pittsburgh, PA. Philadelphia, PA Office (3/16/00). CITATIONS Communications Act 47 U.S.C. � 302 and/or 47 C.F.R. � 2.803 (sale and marketing of non-certified equipment) National Wholesale Liquidators, Inc., Flushing, NY. New York, NY Office (3/14/00). Electronic Wonders Computers & Digital Imaging, New York, NY. New York, NY Office (3/21/00). T.P. Electronics, Chicago, IL. Chicago, IL Office (3/23/00). � $ $ $ � � ��PNG �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� �� � �a�% Tf(c) U~��Uy�Ӛ�o=�c� {�YAD
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Enforcement/Public_Notices/2000/da001683.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Enforcement/Public_Notices/2000/da001683.html
  • Inc., Walled Lake, MI. Detroit, MI District Office (6/12/00). Transport One, Inc., d/b/a Imperial Car Service, Long Island City, NY, WPMK-242. New York, NY District Office (6/19/00). Cox Communications, KNNB712, Atlanta, GA. Boston, MA District Office (6/23/00). CITATIONS Communications Act 47 U.S.C. � 302 - Devices Which Interfere With Radio Reception Westell, Inc., Aurora, IL. Other violations: 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803 (Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization) and 15.19 (Labelling Requirements). Chicago, IL District Office (6/21/00). 47 C.F.R. Part 15 - Radio Frequency Devices 47 C.F.R. � 15.109 - Radiated Emission Limits Ramada Inn, New Port Richey, FL. Tampa, FL District Office (6/19/00). 4 6 T `` � � � � $ $ 5 6 � � �
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Enforcement/Public_Notices/2000/da001850.doc
  • Requirements). Denver, CO District Office (7/21/00). 47 C.F.R. � 90.425 - Station Identification Monsey New Square Trails Corporation, WPJH-744, Alpine, NJ. New York, NY District Office (7/6/00). Fernando Nuesi, d.b.a.Atlantic Car Service, WPMS-544, Brooklyn, NY. New York, NY District Office (7/7/00). CITATIONS 47 C.F.R. Part 2 - Frequency Allocations and Radio Treaty Matters; General Rules and Regulations 47 C.F.R. � 2.803 - Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization Xended Camera Support, Inc., St. Paul, MN. Other violations: 47 C.F.R. �� 2.925 (Identification of Equipment), 2.926 (FCC Identifier), and 15.101 (Equipment Authorization of Unintended Radiators). Los Angeles, CA District Office (7/10/00). Digital Cinema Products Corp., Huntington Beach, CA. Other violations: 47 C.F.R. �� 2.925 (Identification of Equipment), 2.926 (FCC
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Enforcement/Public_Notices/2000/da002136.doc
  • Detroit, MI District Office (8/15/00). Lucas G. Heartsill, San Angelo, TX. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. � 97.119(Station Identification). Detroit, MI District Office (8/15/00) Nancy B. Heartsill, San Angelo, TX. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. � 97.119(Station Identification). Detroit, MI District Office (8/15/00) CITATIONS 47 C.F.R. Part 2 - Frequency Allocations and Radio Treaty Matters; General Rules and Regulations 47 C.F.R. � 2.803 - Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization Tansvideo, North Hollywood, CA. Los Angeles, CA District Office (8/4/00). Electronics Unlimited, Frederick, MD. Columbia, MD District Office (8/16/00). G H y { $ $ G H z { { � � � F |� ��PNG �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� �� � �a�% Tf(c) U~��Uy�Ӛ�o=�c� {�YAD
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Enforcement/Public_Notices/2000/da002408.doc
  • with the instructions and by the deadline set forth in the NAL, NOV or Citation. NOTICES OF APPARENT LIABILITY Communications Act 47 U.S.C. � 301 - Unlicensed Operation Hormigonera Chaparro Inc. Aguada, PR. $5,000 NAL. San Juan, PR Resident Agent Office (9/26/00). 47 C.F.R. Part 2 - Frequency Allocations and Radio Treaty Matters; General Rules and Regulations 47 C.F.R. � 2.803 - Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization Stephen Fowler d/b/a Exports R Us., Pineville LA. $7,000 NAL. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. � 2.815 (External Radio Frequency Power Amplifiers). New Orleans, LA District Office (9/28/00). 47 C.F.R. Part 17 - Construction, Marking and Lighting of Antenna Structures 47 C.F.R. � 17.4 - Antenna Structure Registration Natchez Communications, Inc.,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2000/fcc00430.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2000/fcc00430.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2000/fcc00430.txt
  • Order, FCC 98-338, 13 FCC Rcd 24687 (1999). Id. at � 33. We currently do not allow TCBs to certify equipment requiring measurements of the specific absorption rate (SAR) of RF radiation by the body. No change in that policy is proposed. Marketing as defined by the Commission's rules includes selling, offering for sale, and advertising. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(e)(4). See 5 U.S.C. � 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. � 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA). See 5 U.S.C. � 603(a). See id. 5 U.S.C.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1999/da992743.pdf
  • 11.Pre-1991frequenciesaredeletedfromfootnoteUS296,whichisrevisedtoreadas follows:"Inthebandsdesignatedforshipwide-bandtelegraphy,facsimileandspecial transmissionsystems,thefollowingassignablefrequenciesareavailabletonon-Federal governmentstationsonasharedbasiswithFederalgovernmentstations:2070.5,2072.5,2074.5, 2076.5,4154.5,4169.5,6235.5,6259.5,8302.5,8338.5,12370.5,12418.5,16551.5,16614.5, 18847.5,18868.5,22181.5,22238.5,25123.5,and25159.5kHz."32 27FootnoteUS288haspreviouslybeendeletedfromthelistofUnitedStatesfootnotes.SeeAmendmentof Parts2,25,80,and87oftheCommission'sRulesRegardingImplementationoftheFinalActsoftheWorld AdministrativeRadioConferencefortheMobileServices,Geneva,1987,GEN.DocketNo.89-103,Reportand Order,4FCCRcd7603(1989). 28SeeNTIAManualatp.4-7. 29SeeReviewoftheTechnicalAssignmentCriteriafortheAMBroadcastService,MMDocketNo.87-267, ReportandOrder,FCC91-303,6FCCRcd6273(1991). 30Wehavesplitthebandinordertohighlightfootnote480(re-numberedatWRC-95asS5.89),which placesrequirementsontheuseofthebandscomprising1605-1705kHz. 31SeeReviewoftheTechnicalAssignmentCriteriafortheAMBroadcastService,MMDocketNo.87-267, MemorandumOpinionandOrder,FCC93-198,8FCCRcd3250(1993).SeealsoNTIAManualatp.4-8. 32InJanuary1991,theCommissionadopted"changestoitsRulesthatsubstantiallyrevisethechanneling plansinthehighfrequencybandsbetween4000kHzand27500kHzallocatedexclusivelytothemaritime mobileservice."AmongtheserulechangesweretheadoptionoffootnoteUS296andtherevisionofthe frequenciesauthorizedforshipstationfacsimile,whicharethepostJuly1,1991frequencieslistedinfootnote US296.See47C.F.R.�80.363(a)(1).TheCommissionorderedthat"thisReportandOrderiseffectiveat0001 hoursUTC[CoordinatedUniversalTime]onJuly1,1991."SeeAmendmentofParts2and80ofthe 7 FederalCommunicationsCommission DA99-2743 ChangestotheUnitedStatesTableintheFrequencyRangefrom3MHzto30MHz(HF): 12.MinortypographicalerrorsarecorrectedinfootnoteG106.33 13.Inthe5060-5450kHzband,theFederalandNon-FederalGovernmentTablesare correctedtoindicatethatthemobileexceptaeronauticalmobileserviceisallocatedona secondary--notprimary--basis.34ExpiredfootnoteUS284isremovedfromthelistofUnited Statesfootnotes.35Inthe6765-7000kHzband,theFederalandNon-FederalGovernmentTables arecorrectedtoindicatethatthemobileserviceisallocatedonasecondary--notprimary-- basis.36Inthe10003-10005kHzband,theNon-FederalGovernmentTableiscorrectedbyadding referencetofootnoteUS340andbydeletingreferencetofootnoteG106. ChangestotheUnitedStatesTableintheFrequencyRangefrom30MHzto300MHz(VHF): 14.WefindthatthefrequencybandslistedinfootnoteNG124canbemoreclosely matchedtothefrequencysegmentslistedinSection90.20(e)(4)oftheCommission'sRules.37 Accordingly,footnoteNG124isrevisedtoreadasfollows:"Withindesignatedsegmentsofthe Commission'sRulesregardingrevisionofthehighfrequency(HF)channelsforthemaritimemobileserviceto implementtheFinalActsoftheWorldAdministrativeRadioConferencefortheMobileServices,Geneva,1987, PRDocketNo.90-133,ReportandOrder,FCC91-17,6FCCRcd786(1991). 33Specifically,twomissingcommasareadded.CorrectedfootnoteG106readsasfollows:"Thebands 2501-2502kHz,5003-5005kHz,10003-10005kHz,15005-15010kHz,19990-19995kHz,20005-20010kHzand 25005-25010kHzarealsoallocated,onasecondarybasis,tothespaceresearchservice.Thespaceresearch transmissionsaresubjecttoimmediatetemporaryorpermanentshutdownintheeventofinterferencetothe receptionofthestandardfrequencyandtimebroadcasts."SeeNTIAManualatp.4-97. 34SeeNTIAManualatp.4-15. 35FootnoteUS284readsasfollows:"UntilJuly1,1991,thecarrierfrequencies6451.9and6455.0kHz maybeauthorizedtonon-GovernmentshiptelephoneandcoasttelephonestationsoperatingontheMississippi Rivermaritimemobileserviceontheconditionthatharmfulinterferencenotbecausedtoservicesoperatingin accordancewiththeTableofFrequencyAllocationsandthatanyinterferencefromsuchservicesmustbe accepted."WhilefootnoteUS284waspreviouslydeletedfromtheTablebecauseithadexpired,US284was inadvertentlynotremovedfromthelistofUnitedStatesfootnotes. 36SeeAmendmentoftheCommission'sRulesConcerningMaritimeCommunications,PRDocketNo.97- 257,SecondReportandOrderandSecondFurtherNoticeofProposedRuleMaking,12FCCRcd16949,17044 (1997). 37Currently,footnoteNG124readsasfollows:"Inthepublicsafetyradioserviceallocationswithinthe bands30-50MHz,150-174MHz,and450-470MHz,policeradioservicelicenseesareauthorizedtooperatelow powerradiotransmittersonasecondary,non-interferencebasisinaccordancewiththeprovisionsofSections 2.803and90.19(f)(5)oftheRules."Initsre-writeofPart90,theCommissionmergedthefrequenciesavailable tothepoliceradioserviceintothepublicsafetyradiopoolandre-numberedSection90.19(f)(5)asSection 90.20(e)(5). 8 FederalCommunicationsCommission DA99-2743 bandsthatcomprise30.85-47.41MHz,150.8-159.465MHz,and453.0125-467.9875MHz,police licenseesareauthorizedtooperatelowpowerradiotransmittersonasecondary,non-interference basisinaccordancewiththeprovisionsof47C.F.R.��2.803and90.20(e)(5)."Referenceto footnoteNG124isdeletedfromthe35-36MHzand173.2-173.4MHzbandsbecausethesebands arenotamongthedesignatedsegmentslistedinSection90.20(e)(4).Inthe154-156.2475MHz band,referencetofootnotesNG124andNG148isdeletedfromtheFederalGovernmentTable andisaddedtotheNon-FederalGovernmentTable. 15.ExpiredfootnoteNG133,whichdealtwiththe73-74.6MHzband,isremovedfrom thelistofnon-Federalgovernmentfootnotes.38 16.Footnote572hasbeenre-numberedasfootnoteS5.180anditstexthasbeenmodified inordertoremoveanexpiredrequirement,whichreadasfollows:"Until31December1989, administrationsinRegions2and3shouldrefrainfromassigningfrequenciestootherservices inthebands74.6-74.8MHzand75.2-75.4MHz."SincefootnoteS5.180nolongerappliesto the74.6-74.8MHzand75.2-75.4MHzbands,theFederalandNon-FederalGovernmentTables areupdatedbydeletingthereferencetofootnote572inthosebands;footnote572isre-numbered asS5.180intheremaining74.8-75.5MHzband. 17.Inthe76-88MHzband,theFederalandNon-FederalGovernmentTablesare correctedbydeletingfootnotereferenceNG128fromtheFederalGovernmentTableandadding ittotheNon-FederalGovernmentTable.Inaddition,wetakethisopportunitytocorrectthetext offootnoteNG128,39whichisrevisedtoreadasfollows:"Intheband535-1705kHz,AM broadcastlicenseesorpermitteesmayusetheirAMcarrieronasecondarybasistotransmit signalsintendedforbothbroadcastandnon-broadcastpurposes.Intheband88-108MHz,FM broadcastlicenseesorpermitteesarepermittedtousesubcarriersonasecondarybasistotransmit signalsintendedforbothbroadcastandnon-broadcastpurposes.Inthebands54-72,76-88,174- 216,470-608and614-806MHz,TVbroadcastlicenseesorpermitteesarepermittedtouse subcarriersonasecondarybasisforbothbroadcastandnon-broadcastpurposes." 18.Inthe108-117.975MHz,1559-1610MHz,and5000-5250MHzbands,wenotethat NTIAhasaddedfootnoteG126totheFederalGovernmentTableinitsManual.40The 38FootnoteNG133readasfollows:"Stationsauthorizedintheband73-74.6MHzasofDecember31, 1961,werepermittedtocontinuetooperateuntilDecember31,1985.Suchstationsshallnotberequiredto affordprotectiontoradioastronomyobservationswithintheUnitedStatesandpossessions,however,such stationsmustaffordprotectiontotheobservatoriesofothercountries."WhileNG133haspreviouslybeen deletedfromtheTable,itwasinadvertentlyleftinthelistofnon-Federalgovernmentfootnotes. 39FootnoteNG128incorrectlystatesthattheUHFtelevisionbandis740-890MHz.TheUHFtelevision bandisactually470-608MHzand614-806MHz. 40SeeNTIAManualatpp.4-39,4-57,4-68,and4-98.NTIAproposesthatfootnoteG126readasfollows: "Differentialglobalpositioningsystem(DGPS)stationsmaybeauthorizedonaprimarybasisinthebands108- 117.975MHz,1559-1610MHz,and5000-5150MHzforthespecificpurposeoftransmittingDGPSinformation 9 FederalCommunicationsCommission DA99-2743 CommissionhaspreviouslyproposedtoaddfootnoteG126totheFederalGovernmentTablein the5000-5150MHzband.41WeintendtofoldconsiderationoftheadoptionoffootnoteG126 inthe108-117.975MHzand1559-1610MHzbandsintoanupcomingproceedingthatwilldeal primarilywiththedomesticimplementationofallocationamendmentsmadeatWorld RadiocommunicationConferencesthathavenotpreviouslybeenconsideredbytheCommission ("WRCImplementationproceeding").42Atthistime,wehaveaddedanoteincolumn6foreach ofthesebands,thushighlightingthisissue. 19.Inthe137.025-137.175MHzand137.825-138MHzbands,theFederalandNon- FederalGovernmentTablesarecorrectedtoindicatethatthemobile-satelliteserviceisallocated onasecondary--notprimary--basis.43Inthe149.9-150.05MHzband,theFederalandNon- FederalGovernmentTablesarecorrectedbychangingthelandmobile-satelliteserviceallocation toamobile-satelliteserviceallocation.44Afterdeletingexpiredinformation,thelimitationsfound infootnotesUS32245andUS32646arecombinedintoasinglefootnote,US322,whichisrevised toreadasfollows:"Useofthebands149.9-150.5MHzand399.9-400.05MHzbythemobile-
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Public_Notices/1999/da992150.doc
  • not permit these devices to be manufactured, imported, marketed or operated within the United States. Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 USC 302(b), prohibits the manufacture, importation, sale, offer for sale, or use of devices that fail to comply with the regulations promulgated pursuant to this section. Similar prohibitions are contained in the Commission's rules, e.g., 47 CFR Sections 2.803, 2.1203, and 22.377. In addition, in accordance with Section 301 of the Communications Act, 47 USC 301, persons operating or using radio transmitters must be licensed or authorized under the Commission's rules. There are no provisions in the FCC's rules that permit the operation of any device intended to interfere with cellular communications. Further, Section 333 of the Communications Act,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Orders/1997/fcc97050.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Orders/1997/fcc97050.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Orders/1997/fcc97050.wp
  • license term for a partitioned license area and for disaggregated spectrum shall be the remainder of the original licensee's license term as provided for in section 27.13. Subpart C -- Technical Standards Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-50 27 � 27.51 Equipment authorization. (a) Each transmitter utilized for operation under this part and each transmitter marketed, as set forth in section 2.803 of this chapter, must be of a type that has been authorized by the Commission under its type acceptance procedure. (b) The Commission periodically publishes a list of type accepted equipment, entitled "Radio Equipment List, Equipment Accepted for Licensing." Copies of this list are available for public reference at the Commission's offices in Washington, D.C., at each of its field
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Public_Notices/2000/d001760f.doc
  • of the USA, use 999999999 as the TIN or SSN. o EQUIPMENT AUTHORIZATION PROCEDURES The equipment approval of a radio frequency device may be covered by ``Certification.'' 1/ Marketing and/or importing equipment in the United States that is subject to Certification prior to the issuance of a Grant of Equipment Authorization (FCC Form 731A) is prohibited by 47 CFR, Section 2.803 of the rules and Section 302 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (The Act). Violation of the rules and the Act may subject the violator to the fines and forfeitures specified in Sections 501 and 503 of the Act. -B1- o APPLICANT FOR EQUIPMENT AUTHORIZATION The applicant for equipment authorization should be a party who can accept the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/1997/dd970205.html
  • WIRELESS NARROWBAND COMMERCIAL RADIO SERVICE INFORMATION - PUBLIC MOBILE SERVICES - RE: APPPLICATIONS ACCEPTED FOR FILING. Internet URL: [7]http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1997/pnwl7032.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- ACE COMMUNICATIONS. Ordered Ace Communications to forfeit $20,000 for the willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803 of the Commission's rules. Action by Chief, Compliance Division, Compliance and Information Bureau. Adopted: February 4, 1997. by Notice of Forfeiture. (DA No. 97-264). CIB COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS. Issued letter regarding Comcast Cable Communication's FCC Form 1240 submissions for August 1, 1996; found that Comcast calculated its inflation adjustment factor consistent with the Commission's rules, however Comcast made a good
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/1997/dd970212.html
  • and Information Bureau. Adopted: February 6, 1997. by Order. (DA No. 97-314). CIB Internet URL: [10]http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Compliance/Orders/1997/da970314.txt ACI MICRO SYSTEMS. Denied Petition for Reconsideration filed by ACI Micro Systems requesting review of a monetary forfeiture of $10,000 imposed on ACI by CIB's Denver Field Office for willlful violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended and Section 2.803 of the Commission's rules; assessed a $10,000 forfeiture. Action by Chief, Compliance and Information Bureau. Adopted: February 6, 1997. by Order. (DA No. 97-313). CIB Internet URL: [11]http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Compliance/Orders/1997/da970313.txt BARRY A. STEVENSON. Denied Petition for Reconsideration filed by Barry A. Stevenson requesting review of a monetary forfeiture of $2,000 for violating Section 15.29 of the Commission's Rules by failing to allow
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/1997/dd970221.html
  • monetary forfeiture to $5,000. Action by Chief, Compliance and Information Bureau. Adopted: February 12, 1997. by Order. (DA No. 97-360). CIB Internet URL: [27]http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Compliance/Orders/1997/da970360.txt BLACKSHIP COMPUTER SYSTEMS, SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA. Denied Blackship Computer Systems Petition for Reconsideration requesting review of the $5,600 monetary forfeiture issued for violation of Section 302 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended and Section 2.803 of the Commission's Rules. Action by Chief, Compliance and Information Bureau. Adopted: February 12, 1997. by Order. (DA No. 97-359). CIB Internet URL: [28]http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Compliance/Orders/1997/da970359.txt MICROWAVE SATELLITE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Granted Microwave Satellite Technologies, Inc., certification to operate an open video system in New York, New York. Action by Chief, Cable Services Bureau. by MO&O. (DA No. 97-384). CSB Internet URL: [29]http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1997/da970384.txt
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2002/dd020220.html
  • Contact: Bobby Brown at (202) 418-0539, email: babrown@fcc.gov or Jennifer Bush at (202) 418-0586, email: jbush@fcc.gov, William Cross at (202) 418-0680, email: bcross@fcc.gov [34]DA-02-382A1.doc ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- ELECTRONICS UNLIMITED. Issued a monetary forfeiture in the amount of $7,000.00 to Electronics for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's rules. Action by: Chief, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 02/15/2002 by Forfeiture Order. (DA No. 02-373). EB [35]DA-02-373A1.doc [36]DA-02-373A1.pdf [37]DA-02-373A1.txt GARMIN INTERNATIONAL, INC.. Conditionally, granted the request for waiver of Section 87.173(b) of the Commission's Rules Governing Assignable Carrier Frequencies in the the Aviation Services. Action by: Public Safety and Private Wireless Division. Adopted: 02/19/2002 by ORDER. (DA No.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2004/dd040518.html
  • telecommunications carrier. Action by: Deuty Chief, Consumer Policy Division, Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau. Adopted: 05/13/2004 by ORDER. (DA No. 04-1358). CGB [7]DA-04-1358A1.doc [8]DA-04-1358A1.pdf [9]DA-04-1358A1.txt SCHUMACHER ELECTRIC CORPORATION. Adopted Consent Decree terminating the forfeiture proceeding initiated against Schumacher Electric Corporation for its apparent failure to comply with the equipment requirements set forth in Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a) of the Rules. Action by: Chief, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 05/14/2004 by ORDER. (DA No. 04-1377). EB [10]DA-04-1377A1.doc [11]DA-04-1377A1.pdf [12]DA-04-1377A1.txt GUARANTEED HEALTH INSURANCE ADVISORS. Issued Official Citation to Guaranteed Health Insurance Advisors, Houston and Missouri City, Texas for violation of the TCPA and Commission's rules regarding transmitting prerecorded unsolicited advertisements to residential telephone lines. Action by: Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Consumers Division,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2005/dd050520.html
  • COST ROUTING, INC. Denied the complaint regarding unauthorized change of subscriber's telecommunications carrier. Action by: Deputy Chief, Consumer Policy Division, Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau. Adopted: 05/17/2005 by ORDER. (DA No. 05-1380). CGB [217]DA-05-1380A1.doc [218]DA-05-1380A1.pdf [219]DA-05-1380A1.txt SANDOWN WIRELESS. Issued an Official Citation to Sandown Wireless for marketing unauthorized equipment in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules. Action by: Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 05/18/2005 by LETTER. (DA No. 05-1388). EB [220]DA-05-1388A1.doc [221]DA-05-1388A1.pdf [222]DA-05-1388A1.txt FM TABLE OF ALLOTMENTS, BASS RIVER TOWNSHIP AND OCEAN CITY, NJ. Proposed Amendment of the FM Table of Allotments for these communities. (Dkt No. 05-188 , RM-11240). Action by: Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau. Comments
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2005/dd050609.html
  • valid license or authorization from the Commission. Action by: Regional Director, South Central Region, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 06/07/2005 by Forfeiture Order. (DA No. 05-1611). EB [27]DA-05-1611A1.doc [28]DA-05-1611A1.pdf [29]DA-05-1611A1.txt GRAND TRADES COMPANY. Issued an Official Citation to Grand Trades Company for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules. Action by: Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 06/07/2005 by LETTER. (DA No. 05-1622). EB [30]DA-05-1622A1.doc [31]DA-05-1622A1.pdf [32]DA-05-1622A1.txt ERRATUM - ICO SATELLITE SERVICES G.P./APPLICATION FOR MODIFICATION OF 2 GHZ LOI AUTHORIZATION/PETITION FOR DECLARATORY RULING OR WAIVER. Issued Erratum correcting Order and Authorization, DA 05-1504, released May 24, 2005. Action by: Chief, Satellite Division, International
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2005/dd050615.html
  • by the National Automobile Dealers Association. (Dkt No. 02-278). Action by: Acting Chief, Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau. Adopted: 06/14/2005 by Declaratory Ruling. (DA No. 05-1667). CGB [52]DA-05-1667A1.doc [53]DA-05-1667A1.pdf [54]DA-05-1667A1.txt DISCOUNTED GARAGE DOOR OPENERS. Issued an Official Citation to Discounted Garage Door Openers for marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a) of the Rules. Action by: Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 06/15/2005 by LETTER. (DA No. 05-1666). EB [55]DA-05-1666A1.doc [56]DA-05-1666A1.pdf [57]DA-05-1666A1.txt BROWN TRAIL CHURCH. Denied the Petition. Action by: Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau. Adopted: 06/13/2005 by MO&O. (DA No. 05-1669). MB [58]DA-05-1669A1.doc [59]DA-05-1669A1.pdf [60]DA-05-1669A1.txt AWAKENING MINISTRIES. Denied the Petition. Action by: Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2005/dd050720.html
  • WTB [35]DOC-260071A1.pdf [36]DOC-260071A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P. D/B/A SPRINT PCS. Adopted a Consent Decree in this proceeding. Action by: Acting Chief, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 07/15/2005 by ORDER. (DA No. 05-1971). EB [37]DA-05-1971A1.doc [38]DA-05-1971A1.pdf [39]DA-05-1971A1.txt TELERADIO AB. Admonished TeleRadio AB for importing and marketing non-compliant radiofrequency equipment in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a) of the Rules. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 07/18/2005 by MO&O. (DA No. 05-2036). EB [40]DA-05-2036A1.doc [41]DA-05-2036A1.pdf [42]DA-05-2036A1.txt CALVARY CHAPEL WINDWARD, ET AL. Reinstated and granted applications for new Low Power FM stations. Action by: Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau by LETTER. (DA No. 05-2026). MB [43]DA-05-2026A1.doc [44]DA-05-2026A1.pdf [45]DA-05-2026A1.txt GERALD R. PROCTOR. Denied petition for reconsideration
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2005/dd050804.html
  • (DA No. 05-2256). (Dkt No 05-234) STREAMLINED PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED. Comments Due: 08/18/2005. Reply Comments Due: 08/25/2005. WCB. Contact: Tracey Wilson-Parker at (202) 418-1394 or Renee Crittendon at (202) 418-2352 [13]DA-05-2256A1.doc [14]DA-05-2256A1.pdf [15]DA-05-2256A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- BARAK BITTON. Issued an Official Citation to Barak Bitton for marketing unauthorized RF devices, in violation of Sections 302(b) of Act and 2.803(a) of the Rules. Action by: Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau by LETTER. (DA No. 05-2237). EB [16]DA-05-2237A1.doc [17]DA-05-2237A1.pdf [18]DA-05-2237A1.txt GABRIEL LLC. Issued an Official Citation to Gabriel LLC for marketing unauthorized RF devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a) of the Rules. Action by: Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau by LETTER.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2005/dd050822.html
  • NORTH AMERICAN NUMBERING COUNCIL. (DA No. 05-2276). (Dkt No 92-237). WCB. Contact: Deborah Blue at (202) 418-1466, email: Deborah.Blue@fcc.gov, TTY: (202) 418-0484, Fax: (202) 418-2345 [10]DA-05-2276A1.doc [11]DA-05-2276A1.pdf [12]DA-05-2276A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- BLITZZ TECHNOLOGY, INC. Issued an Official Citation to Blitzz Technology, Inc. for marketing unlabeled radio frequency devices in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 2.925 of the Rules. Action by: Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 08/18/2005 by LETTER. (DA No. 05-2318). EB [13]DA-05-2318A1.doc [14]DA-05-2318A1.pdf [15]DA-05-2318A1.txt MATINEE RADIO, LLC RE: NEW (FM), MARFA, TX, ET AL. Denied the Petition for Declaratory Ruling. Action by: Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau by LETTER. (DA No. 05-2306). MB [16]DA-05-2306A1.doc [17]DA-05-2306A1.pdf [18]DA-05-2306A1.txt FALCON BROADBAND, INC.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2005/dd051108.html
  • 05-2946). (Dkt No 96-45). Comments Due: 11/28/2005. Reply Comments Due: 12/11/2005. WCB. Contact: Carol Pomponio (202) 418-7400; TTY: (202)418-0484 [20]DA-05-2946A1.doc [21]DA-05-2946A1.pdf [22]DA-05-2946A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- BUREAU D'ELECTRONIQUE APPLIQUEE, INC.. Imposed a forfeiture in the amount of $17,000 for marketing and importing unauthorized intentional radiating equipment in willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a) of the Rules. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 11/04/2005 by Forfeiture Order. (DA No. 05-2928). EB [23]DA-05-2928A1.doc [24]DA-05-2928A1.pdf [25]DA-05-2928A1.txt WITHERS BROADCASTING COMPANY OF WEST VIRGINIA (WDTV-TV). Dismissed petition without prejudice submitted by Withers Broadcasting Company of West Virginia to modify Clarksburg-Weston, West Virginia designated market area to include communities in Monongalia County, West Virginia. Action by:
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2006/dd060317.html
  • in the amount of $5,600 for marketing in the United States unauthorized intentional radiating devices. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 03/15/2006 by NALF. (DA No. 06-591). EB [90]DA-06-591A1.doc [91]DA-06-591A1.pdf [92]DA-06-591A1.txt ESTOP ELECTRONICS, INC. Issued an Official Citation to ESTOP Electronics, Inc. for marketing uncertified CB transceiver in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803 of the Rules. Action by: Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau by LETTER. (DA No. 06-587). EB [93]DA-06-587A1.doc [94]DA-06-587A1.pdf [95]DA-06-587A1.txt FM TABLE OF ALLOTMENTS, DENVER CITY, TX. Dismissed the Petition for Rulemaking. (Dkt No. 05-155 , RM-11226). Action by: Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau. Adopted: 03/15/2006 by R&O. (DA No. 06-612). MB [96]DA-06-612A1.doc [97]DA-06-612A1.pdf [98]DA-06-612A1.txt FM TABLE OF
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2006/dd060525.html
  • merits of the Petition. by Declaratory Ruling on Reconsideration. (Dkt No. 03-123). Action by: Chief, Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau. Adopted: 05/25/2006 by RECON. (DA No. 06-1100). CGB [16]DA-06-1100A1.doc [17]DA-06-1100A1.pdf [18]DA-06-1100A1.txt ONEIDA AIR SYSTEMS, INC. Issued an Official Citation to Oneida Air Systems, Inc. for marketing unauthorized remote control devices in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a) of the Rules. Action by: Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau by LETTER. (DA No. 06-1084). EB [19]DA-06-1084A1.doc [20]DA-06-1084A1.pdf [21]DA-06-1084A1.txt EL DORADO 900, LLC. Issued a monetary forfeiture in the amount of $13,000 to El Dorado 900, LLC, for failure to comply with the antenna lighting, monitoring, notification and registration requirements specified. Action by: Regional Director, Western Region, Enforcement
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2006/dd060713.html
  • Dismissed the petition for reconsideration filed by Jhony Desinor as untimely. Action by: Chief, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 07/11/2006 by MO&O. (DA No. 06-1437). EB [10]DA-06-1437A1.doc [11]DA-06-1437A1.pdf [12]DA-06-1437A1.txt OVISLINK TECHNOLOGIES, CORP. Issued an Official Citation for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices, specifically, external radio frequency power amplifiers, in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections 2.803 and 15.204(d) of the Rules. Action by: Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau by LETTER. (DA No. 06-1436). EB [13]DA-06-1436A1.doc [14]DA-06-1436A1.pdf [15]DA-06-1436A1.txt CENTURY COMMUNICATIONS OF FL, INC. Granted the application for Open Video System certification. Action by: Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau. Adopted: 07/12/2006 by MO&O. (DA No. 06-1417). MB [16]DA-06-1417A1.doc [17]DA-06-1417A1.pdf [18]DA-06-1417A1.txt ADDENDA: THE FOLLOWING ITEMS, RELEASED
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2006/dd061221.html
  • Action by: Assistant Chief, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 12/19/2006 by MO&O. (DA No. 06-2537). EB [95]DA-06-2537A1.doc [96]DA-06-2537A1.pdf [97]DA-06-2537A1.txt GAMBLER'S CB & HAM RADIO SALES & SERVICE. Issued a monetary forfeiture in the amount of $7,000 to Gambler's CB & Ham Radio Sales & Service for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules. Action by: Regional Director, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 12/19/2006 by Forfeiture Order. (DA No. 06-2549). EB [98]DA-06-2549A1.doc [99]DA-06-2549A1.pdf [100]DA-06-2549A1.txt INTELSAT NORTH AMERICA LLC. Granted Intelsat North America LLC (Intelsat) conditional authority to modify its earth station in Nuevo, California. Action by: Chief, Satellite Division, International Bureau. Adopted: 12/21/2006 by O&A. (DA No. 06-2557). IB [101]DA-06-2557A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2007/dd070131.html
  • certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar in violation of the Commission's Rules. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau by LETTER. (DA No. 07-312). EB [168]DA-07-312A1.doc [169]DA-07-312A1.pdf [170]DA-07-312A1.txt DREAMBOX USA. Issued an Official Citiation to DreamBox USA for marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in violation of Section 302a(b) of the Communications Act, and Section 2.803 of the Commission's Rules. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau by LETTER. (DA No. 07-321). EB [171]DA-07-321A1.doc [172]DA-07-321A1.pdf [173]DA-07-321A1.txt THE TWISTER GROUP, INC. Issued an Official Citation to The Twister Group, Inc. for marketing in the U.S. certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar in violation of the Commission's Rules. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2007/dd070419.html
  • to Tower Products, Inc. for marketing unauthorized RF devices and illegal importation of RF devices. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau by LETTER. (DA No. 07-1753). EB [19]DA-07-1753A1.doc [20]DA-07-1753A1.pdf [21]DA-07-1753A1.txt DEALZNET.COM. Issued an Official Citation to Dealznet.com for marketing police radar jamming devices, RMR-201 and RMR-C450 manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar in violation of Section 302(b) and Sections 2.803,15.205 and 15.209 of the Rules. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau by LETTER. (DA No. 07-1758). EB [22]DA-07-1758A1.doc [23]DA-07-1758A1.pdf [24]DA-07-1758A1.txt CHUMBO CORPORATION. Issued an Official Citation to Chumbo Corporation for marketing a police radar jamming device, the RMR-450 device from Rocky Mountain Radar in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2007/dd070420.html
  • Reconsideration. Assessed a $11,200 forfeiture against Vitec Group Communications Limited for marketing unauthorized RF devices in the United States. Action by: Chief, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 04/18/2007 by MO&O. (DA No. 07-1760). EB [24]DA-07-1760A1.doc [25]DA-07-1760A1.pdf [26]DA-07-1760A1.txt FADFUSION. Issued an Official Citation to Fadfusion for marketing police radar jamming devices in the U.S. in violation of Sections 302(b) of the Act, Sections 2.803,15.205 and 15.209 of the Rules. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau by LETTER. (DA No. 07-1766). EB [27]DA-07-1766A1.doc [28]DA-07-1766A1.pdf [29]DA-07-1766A1.txt DSMILLER.COM. Issued an Official Citation to DSMiller.com for marketing police radar jamming devices in the U.S. in violation of Sections 302(b) of the Act, Sections 2.803,15.205 and 15.209 of the Rules. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2007/dd070718.html
  • telecommunications carrier. Action by: Deputy Chief, Consumer Policy Division, Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau. Adopted: 07/12/2007 by ORDER. (DA No. 07-3278). CGB [67]DA-07-3278A1.doc [68]DA-07-3278A1.pdf [69]DA-07-3278A1.txt OVERSEAS BEST BUY, INC. DBA 110220VOLTS.COM. Issued an Official Citation to Overseas Best Buy, Inc. dba 110220volts.com for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices, radar jammers, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Rules. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau by LETTER. (DA No. 07-3266). EB [70]DA-07-3266A1.doc [71]DA-07-3266A1.pdf [72]DA-07-3266A1.txt DTV TABLE OF ALLOTMENTS, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON. Denied the Petition for Rule Making. Action by: Chief, Video Division, Media Bureau. Adopted: 07/13/2007 by R&O. (DA No. 07-3246). MB [73]DA-07-3246A1.doc [74]DA-07-3246A1.pdf [75]DA-07-3246A1.txt KCCP TRUST D/B/A TIME WARNER CABLE. Granted
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2007/dd070719.html
  • No 07-144). Comments Due: 08/02/2007. Reply Comments Due: 08/09/2007. WCB. Contact: Tracey Wilson-Parker at (202) 418-1394, or Jodie May at (202) 418-0913 [10]DA-07-3315A1.doc [11]DA-07-3315A1.pdf [12]DA-07-3315A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- UNBEATABLESALE.COM, INC. Issued an Official Citation to Unbeatablesale.com, Inc. for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices, radar jammers, in the U.S. in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Rules. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau by LETTER. (DA No. 07-3270). EB [13]DA-07-3270A1.doc [14]DA-07-3270A1.pdf [15]DA-07-3270A1.txt MEDIACOM ILLINOIS AND MEDIACOM CALIFORNIA. Granted the petitions for a determination of effective competition filed by Mediacom Illinois LLC and Mediacom California LLC. Action by: Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau. Adopted: 07/16/2007 by MO&O. (DA No.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2007/dd070726.html
  • 2). OMD. Contact: Jason Brown at (202) 418-0310 [10]DOC-275523A1.pdf [11]DOC-275523A1.txt Released: 07/26/2007. EX PARTE PRESENTATIONS AND POST-REPLY COMMENT PERIOD FILING IN PERMIT-BUT-DISCLOSURE PROCEEDINGS (2 OF 2). OMD. Contact: Jason Brown at (202) 418-0310 [12]DOC-275524A1.pdf [13]DOC-275524A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- SHOPILA CORPORATION. Issued an Official Citation to Shopila Corporation for violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau by LETTER. (DA No. 07-3393). EB [14]DA-07-3393A1.doc [15]DA-07-3393A1.pdf [16]DA-07-3393A1.txt SHOPPERSCHOICE.COM, LLC. Issued an Official Citation to ShoopersChoice.com, LLC for violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2007/dd070802.html
  • the complaint regarding the unauthorized change of subscriber's telecommunications carrier. Action by: Deputy Chief, Consumer Policy Division, Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau. Adopted: 07/31/2007 by ORDER. (DA No. 07-3499). CGB [17]DA-07-3499A1.doc [18]DA-07-3499A1.pdf [19]DA-07-3499A1.txt GAIN SAVER. Issued an Official Citation to Gain Saver for marketing police radar jamming devices in the U.S. in violation of Sections 302(b) of the Act, Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Rules. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau by LETTER. (DA No. 07-3483). EB [20]DA-07-3483A1.doc [21]DA-07-3483A1.pdf [22]DA-07-3483A1.txt UNION-CAROLINA BROADCASTING CO., INC. Denied the petition for reconsideration. Action by: Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau by LETTER. (DA No. 07-3503). MB [23]DA-07-3503A1.doc [24]DA-07-3503A1.pdf [25]DA-07-3503A1.txt LEON F. PETTERSEN. Granted in part and denied in part Petition for
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2007/dd071101.html
  • TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- FUNAI CORPORATION. Notified Funai Corporation of its Apparent Liability for Forfeiture in the amount $7,745,687 for violations of the DTV V-Chip technology requirements. Action by: the Commission. Adopted: 10/31/2007 by NALF. (FCC No. 07-191). EB [27]FCC-07-191A1.doc [28]FCC-07-191A1.pdf [29]FCC-07-191A1.txt BASIC HOME SHOPPING. Issued an Official Citation to Basic Home Shopping for marketing cell phone jammer in violation of 2.803 of the rules. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 10/30/2007 by LETTER. (DA No. 07-4449). EB [30]DA-07-4449A1.doc [31]DA-07-4449A1.pdf [32]DA-07-4449A1.txt SOUTH CENTRAL UTAH TELEPHONE ASSOCIATION. Notified South Central Utah Telephone Association of its Apparent Liability for Forfeiture in the amount of $24,000 for failure to comply with the labeling requirements for digital wireless hearing aid-compatible handsets. Action by:
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2008/dd080128.html
  • Released: 01/28/2008. EX PARTE PRESENTATIONS AND POST-REPLY COMMENT PERIOD FILING IN PERMIT-BUT-DISCLOSURE PROCEEDINGS. OMD. Contact: Jason Lewis at (202) 418-0310 [11]DOC-279720A1.pdf [12]DOC-279720A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- GARDEN STATE INVESTIGATIONS AND SECURITY. Issued a Citation to Garden State Investigations and Security for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States violating section 302(b) of the Communications Act and sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's rule. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau by LETTER. (DA No. 08-155). EB [13]DA-08-155A1.doc [14]DA-08-155A1.pdf [15]DA-08-155A1.txt ERRATUM - RESPIRONICS, INC. Issued Erratum correcting DA 07-5095 released on December 26, 2007. (Dkt No. 05-331). Action by: Office of Engineering and Technoloogy by ERRATUM. (DA No. 08-166). OET [16]DOC-279718A1.doc [17]DOC-279718A1.pdf [18]DOC-279718A1.txt ADDENDA: THE FOLLOWING ITEMS,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2008/dd080228.html
  • the Commission's Rules. Action by: Acting Regional Director, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 02/26/2008 by Forfeiture Order. (DA No. 08-466). EB [22]DA-08-466A1.doc [23]DA-08-466A1.pdf [24]DA-08-466A1.txt DAVID P. PACE JR. Issued a monetary forfeiture in the amount of $7,000 to David P. Pace Jr. , for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules. Action by: Regional Director, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 02/26/2008 by Forfeiture Order. (DA No. 08-461). EB [25]DA-08-461A1.doc [26]DA-08-461A1.pdf [27]DA-08-461A1.txt ERRATUM - FM TABLE OF ALLOTMENTS, PEACH SPRINGS, ARIZONA. Issued an Erratum correcting DA 08-273 released February 1, 2008. (Dkt No. 07-164, RM-11386) by ERRATUM. MB [28]DOC-280513A1.doc [29]DOC-280513A1.pdf [30]DOC-280513A1.txt * * * * * ADDENDA: THE
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2008/dd080522.html
  • amount of $350 to Richard Ross for operating an unauthorized radio transmitter. Action by: Regional Director, South Central Region, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 05/20/2008 by Forfeiture Order. (DA No. 08-1189). EB [15]DA-08-1189A1.doc [16]DA-08-1189A1.pdf [17]DA-08-1189A1.txt PHONEJAMMER.COM. Issued an Official Citation to Phonejammer.com for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803 of the Rules. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau by LETTER. (DA No. 08-1193). EB [18]DA-08-1193A1.doc [19]DA-08-1193A1.pdf [20]DA-08-1193A1.txt PHILLIPS BROADCASTING, LLC. Issued a monetary forfeiture in the amount of $8,000 to Phillips Broadcasting, LLC, licensee of stations WAOC and WFOY, in St. Augustine, Florida for failure to maintain and make available complete public inspection files. Action by: Regional
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2008/dd080523.html
  • PROCEEDINGS. OMD. Contact: Jason Lewis at (202) 418-0310 [8]DOC-282349A1.pdf [9]DOC-282349A1.txt Report No: CWS-08-55 Released: 05/23/2008. ANTENNA STRUCTURE REGISTRATION SERVICE INFORMATION. WTB [10]DOC-282366A1.pdf [11]DOC-282366A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- DAVID STEELE ENTERPRISES. Issued an Official Citation to David Steele Enterprises for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau by LETTER. (DA No. 08-1196). EB [12]DA-08-1196A1.doc [13]DA-08-1196A1.pdf [14]DA-08-1196A1.txt * * * * * ADDENDA: THE FOLLOWING ITEMS, RELEASED MAY 22, 2008, DID NOT APPEAR IN DIGEST NO. 100: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- PUBLIC NOTICES ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- Released: 05/22/2008. ENHANCED SECURITY FEATURES IN CORES. OMD [15]DOC-282338A1.doc [16]DOC-282338A1.pdf [17]DOC-282338A1.txt
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2008/dd080527.html
  • GRANTED. (DA No. 08-1195). (Dkt No 08-57). WCB. Contact: Tracey Wilson-Parker at (202) 418-1394 or Jodie May at (202) 418-0913 [13]DA-08-1195A1.doc [14]DA-08-1195A1.pdf [15]DA-08-1195A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- DPL SURVEILLANCE EQUIPMENT. Issued an Official Citation to DPL Surveillance Equipment for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau by LETTER. (DA No. 08-1202). EB [16]DA-08-1202A1.doc [17]DA-08-1202A1.pdf [18]DA-08-1202A1.txt SAGE BROADCASTING CORPORATION, KXVA(TV), ABILENE, TEXAS. Admonished Sage Broadcasting Corporation for the admitted violation of Section 73.3526 of the Commission's Rules described in KXVA(TV)'s renewal application. Action by: Chief, Video Division, Media Bureau by LETTER. (DA No.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2008/dd080721.html
  • REGIONAL PLANNING COMMITTEES TO HOLD 700 MHZ REGIONAL PUBLIC SAFETY PLANNING AND 800 MHZ NPSPAC REGIONAL PUBLIC SAFETY PLANNING MEETINGS. (DA No. 08-1701). (Dkt No 91-228). PSHSB [18]DA-08-1701A1.doc [19]DA-08-1701A1.pdf [20]DA-08-1701A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- RANGEVIDEO. Issued Official Citation to Rangevideo for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the US in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Rules, and for importing RF devices without filing FCC Form 740. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau by LETTER. (DA No. 08-1685). EB [21]DA-08-1685A1.doc [22]DA-08-1685A1.pdf [23]DA-08-1685A1.txt POST-TRANSITION DTV TABLE OF ALLOTMENTS, 47 C.F.R. SECTION 73.622(I), HENDERSONVILLE, TENNESSEE. Proposed substituting DTV Channel 51 for DTV Channel 33 for Station WPGD-DT. (Dkt No. RM-11460, 08-128). Action
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2008/dd080908.html
  • Robert.Kenny@fcc.gov [11]DA-08-2058A1.doc [12]DA-08-2058A1.pdf [13]DA-08-2058A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- COMTECH MOBILE DATACOM CORPORATION. Adopted a Consent Decree in this proceeding and terminated the investigation. Action by: Deputy Chief, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 09/05/2008 by ORDER. (DA No. 08-2034). EB [14]DA-08-2034A1.doc [15]DA-08-2034A1.pdf [16]DA-08-2034A1.txt MICROVIDEOX, LLC. Issued an Official Citation to MicroVideoX, LLC for marketing unauthorized devices (GPS jammers) in violation of Section 2.803 of the Rules. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 09/08/2008 by LETTER. (DA No. 08-2051). EB [17]DA-08-2051A1.doc [18]DA-08-2051A1.pdf [19]DA-08-2051A1.txt COACHCOMM, LLC. Notified CoachComm of its Apparent Liability for Forfeiture in the amount of $7,000 for marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 2.803(a)(1)
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2008/dd081104.html
  • repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. Action by: Regional Director, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 10/31/2008 by ORDER. (DA No. 08-2449). EB [13]DA-08-2449A1.doc [14]DA-08-2449A1.pdf [15]DA-08-2449A1.txt XLNT IDEA, INC. Notified XLNT Idea, Inc. of its Apparent Liability for Forfeiture in the amount of $14,000 for violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules for marketing unauthorized digital devices. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 10/31/2008 by NALF. (DA No. 08-2437). EB [16]DA-08-2437A1.doc [17]DA-08-2437A1.pdf [18]DA-08-2437A1.txt * * * * * ADDENDA: THE FOLLOWING ITEMS, RELEASED NOVEMBER 3, 2008, DID NOT APPEAR IN DIGEST NO. 215: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- SUNSHINE NOTICE ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- DELETION OF AGENDA ITEM FROM NOVEMBER
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2009/dd090115.html
  • Jason Lewis (202) 418-0310 [16]DOC-287881A1.pdf [17]DOC-287881A1.txt Released: 01/15/2009. EX PARTE PRESENTATIONS AND POST-REPLY COMMENT PERIOD FILING IN PERMIT-BUT-DISCLOSURE PROCEEDINGS (2 OF 2). OMD. Contact: Jason Lewis (202) 418-0310 [18]DOC-287882A1.pdf [19]DOC-287882A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- ARKION SYSTEMS, LLC. Adopted a consent decree terminating an investigation into possible violations by Arkion Systems, LLC of Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections 2.803(a), 2.925, and 15.19 of the rules. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 01/13/2009 by ORDER. (DA No. 09-7). EB [20]DA-09-7A1.doc [21]DA-09-7A1.pdf [22]DA-09-7A1.txt POST-TRANSITION DTV TABLE OF ALLOTMENTS, 47 C.F.R. 73.622(I), RIO GRANDE CITY, TEXAS. Changed station KTLM-DT's DTV channel from 20 to 40. Proceeding Terminated. (Dkt No. RM-11471, 08-141). Action by: Chief, Video Division, Media Bureau. Adopted:
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2009/dd090209.html
  • DATED AND RELEASED TODAY: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- PUBLIC NOTICES ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- Report No: 46918 Released: 02/09/2009. BROADCAST ACTIONS. MB [1]DOC-288319A2.txt [2]DOC-288319A1.pdf Report No: 26918 Released: 02/09/2009. BROADCAST APPLICATIONS. MB [3]DOC-288318A2.txt [4]DOC-288318A1.pdf ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- PRO TECH MONITORING, INC. Issued an Order adopting a Consent Decree terminating an investigation into possible violations of Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections 2.803(a) and 90.203 of the Rules. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 02/05/2009 by NAL. (DA No. 09-182). EB [5]DA-09-182A1.doc [6]DA-09-182A1.pdf [7]DA-09-182A1.txt PETITION FOR PROTECTION FROM WHIPSAWIN AND STOP SETTLEMENT PAYMENT ORDER ON THE U.S.-TONGA ROUTE. Granted, in part, and denied, in part, the motion for extension of time filed by the Tonga Communications Corporation (TCC) in this
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2009/dd090930.html
  • 09-2142). CGB [61]DA-09-2142A1.doc [62]DA-09-2142A1.pdf [63]DA-09-2142A1.txt ERRATUM - CLARITY, A DIVISION OF PLANTRONICS, INC. REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF VOLUME CONTROL REQUEST, 47 C.F.R. SECTION 68.317(F). Issued an Erratum correcting Order, DA 09-2060, released September 16, 2009. Action by: Chief, Disability Rights Office, Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau by ERRATUM. CGB [64]DOC-293762A1.doc [65]DOC-293762A1.pdf [66]DOC-293762A1.txt ERA SYSTEMS CORPORATION REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF SECTIONS 2.803, 15.201 AND 15.253 OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES. Granted in part and denied in part the Waiver Request. (Dkt No. 09-55 ). Action by: Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology. Adopted: 09/30/2009 by ORDER. (DA No. 09-2145). OET [67]DA-09-2145A1.doc [68]DA-09-2145A1.pdf [69]DA-09-2145A1.txt MARK HUBENY ON REQUEST FOR INSPECTION OF RECORDS. Denied the Application for Review filed by Mark Hubeny. Action by: the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2009/dd091106.html
  • [15]DOC-294543A1.txt Report No: CWS-10-09 Released: 11/06/2009. ANTENNA STRUCTURE REGISTRATION SERVICE INFORMATION. WTB [16]DOC-294532A1.pdf [17]DOC-294532A1.txt Report No: CWS-10-10 Released: 11/06/2009. ANTENNA STRUCTURE REGISTRATION SERVICE INFORMATION. WTB [18]DOC-294533A1.pdf [19]DOC-294533A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- R.F. TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Notified R.F. Technologies, Inc. of its Apparent Liability for Forfeiture in the amount of $7,000 for marketing unauthorized radio frequency equipment in violation of section 2.803 of the Commission's rules. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 11/04/2009 by NALF. (DA No. 09-2383). EB [20]DA-09-2383A1.doc [21]DA-09-2383A1.pdf [22]DA-09-2383A1.txt JET FUEL BROADCASTING. Dismissed the Petition for Reconsideration. Action by: Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau by LETTER. (DA No. 09-2393). MB [23]DA-09-2393A1.doc [24]DA-09-2393A1.pdf [25]DA-09-2393A1.txt A-O BROADCASTING CORPORATION. Dismissed the Petition for Reconsideration for Station DKTMN(FM), Cloudcroft, New
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2010/dd100107.html
  • EX PARTE PRESENTATIONS AND POST-REPLY COMMENT PERIOD FILING IN PERMIT-BUT-DISCLOSURE PROCEEDINGS (2 OF 2). OMD . Contact: Jason Lewis at (202) 418-0310 [12]DOC-295529A1.pdf [13]DOC-295529A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- MALA GEOSCIENCE USA, INC. Issued an Official Citation to MALA GeoScience USA,Inc. for marketing and importing an unauthorized radio frequency device in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections 2.803(a) and 2.1203 of the Rules. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau by Citations. (DA No. 10-7). EB [14]DA-10-7A1.doc [15]DA-10-7A1.pdf [16]DA-10-7A1.txt JERRY AND DEBORAH STEVENS. Issued a monetary forfeiture in the amount of $10,000 to Jerry and Deborah Stevens for operating an unlicensed radio transmitter on the frequency 90.1 MHz in Austin, Texas. Action by: Regional Director, South Central
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2010/dd100621.html
  • No. 10-1092). (Dkt No 03-109 ). WCB . Contact: Rebekah Bina or Elise Kohn at (202) 418-7400, TTY: (202) 418-0484 [13]DA-10-1092A1.doc [14]DA-10-1092A1.pdf [15]DA-10-1092A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- USA SHUTTER COMPANY, LLC (FLORIDA). Issued an Official Citation to USA Shutter Company, LLC (Florida) for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and Sections 2.803 and 15.201 of the Commission's Rules. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 06/18/2010 by LETTER. (DA No. 10-1088). EB [16]DA-10-1088A1.doc [17]DA-10-1088A1.pdf [18]DA-10-1088A1.txt * * * * * ADDENDA: THE FOLLOWING ITEMS, RELEASED JUNE 18, 2010, DID NOT APPEAR IN DIGEST NO. 118: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- NEWS RELEASES ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- FCC ANNOUNCES FURTHER DETAILS FOR ITS JUNE 25, 2010
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2010/dd101118.html
  • of Section 76.605(a)(12) of the Commission's Rules. Action by: District Director, Denver District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 11/16/2010 by Citations. (DA No. 10-2190). EB [25]DA-10-2190A1.doc [26]DA-10-2190A1.pdf [27]DA-10-2190A1.txt ABLE CINE TECH. Issued an Official Citation to Able Cine Tech for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules. Action by: District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 11/16/2010 by Citations. (DA No. 10-2188). EB [28]DA-10-2188A1.doc [29]DA-10-2188A1.pdf [30]DA-10-2188A1.txt WOLF SEEBERG VIDEO. Issued an Official Citation to Wolf Seeberg Video for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b)of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2011/dd110127.html
  • and repeated violation of section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and sections 1.903(a) and 95.3 of the Commission's rules. Action by: Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 01/26/2011 by NAL. (DA No. 11-157). EB [10]DA-11-157A1.doc [11]DA-11-157A1.pdf [12]DA-11-157A1.txt DEADLYDEAL.COM. Issued an Official Citation to DeadlyDeal for violating Section 302(b) of the Communications Act and Sections 2.803 of the Commission's rules, for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices. Action by: Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 01/26/2011 by Citations. (DA No. 11-125). EB [13]DA-11-125A1.doc [14]DA-11-125A2.doc [15]DA-11-125A1.pdf [16]DA-11-125A2.pdf [17]DA-11-125A1.txt [18]DA-11-125A2.txt COMTREX COMMUNICATIONS, LTD. Issued an Official Citation against Comtrex Communications, Ltd. for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices. Action by: Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted:
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2011/dd110706.html
  • AND DE FACTO TRANSFER LEASE APPLICATIONS, AND DESIGNATED ENTITY REPORTABLE ELIGIBILITY EVENT APPLICATIONS ACCEPTED FOR FILING. PSHSB [50]DOC-308236A1.pdf [51]DOC-308236A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- NEW GENERATION HOBBIES. Issued an Official Citation to New Generation Hobbies for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices that operate on restricted frequencies in violation of section 302(b) of the Act and sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Rules. Action by: Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 07/01/2011 by LETTER. (DA No. 11-1164). EB [52]DA-11-1164A1.doc [53]DA-11-1164A1.pdf [54]DA-11-1164A1.txt ANNUAL CPNI CERTIFICATION. Determined that no forfeiture penalties should be imposed on the companies listed in the Appendix. Action by: Chief, Telecommunications Consumers Division, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 07/06/2011 by ORDER. (DA No. 11-1142). EB [55]DA-11-1142A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/Forms/Form740/740.pdf
  • contain specific information required by that office. Equipment imported for test, evaluation or display (see import conditions 3 or 4 of Part II of this form) may not be marketed (sold or leased, offered for sale or lease, advertised, etc.). Display of this equipment must include markings clearly indicating that the device(s) are not eligible for sale. See 47 C.F.R. 2.803 for details regarding this labeling. Wireless telephony devices that do not have a FCC grant of equipment authorization must either comply with 47 C.F.R. 2.1204(a)(5) or 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a)(2) (e.g., Verification or Declaration of Conformity is required). The identification (company name and model number/FCC ID) of the radio frequency device specified on the front of this form must be identical
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2002/DOC-238039A1.html
  • 200232700005 ) ) FRN Number: 0006- 2332-82 ) NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE Released: January 25, 2002 By the Enforcement Bureau, Miami Office: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, we find that CTI of Miami, Inc. (``CTI'') apparently violated Sections 301 and 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules,2 by operating an unauthorized high-power cordless telephone without FCC authorization and by marketing an unauthorized high-power cordless telephone (``Senao, SN258-Plus''). We conclude that CTI is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seventeen thousand dollars ($17,000). II BACKGROUND 2. On February 26, 2001 the FCC, Miami Office received a complaint from the Federal Aviation
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2002/DOC-238043A1.html
  • Inc. ) Miami, Florida ) NAL/Acct. No. 200232700009 ) FRN 0006-2915-95 NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE Released: May 21, 2002 By the Enforcement Bureau, Tampa Office: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, we find that Lightning Electronics, Inc. (``Lightning'') apparently violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules,2 by marketing a non-compliant high-power cordless telephone (``Prolink model BAO-6110CID''). We conclude that Lightning is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000). II BACKGROUND 2. On July 27, 2001, agents from the FCC Enforcement Bureau's Miami Resident Agent Office (``Miami Office'') and Tampa Field Office visited Lightning, a retail store
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2002/DOC-239077A1.html
  • ) d/b/a Exports R Us ) File No. EB-00-OR- 104 Pineville, Louisiana ) NAL/Acct.No. X3262010 NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE Released: September 28, 2000 By the Enforcement Bureau, New Orleans Field Office: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, we find that Stephen Fowler d/b/a Exports R Us (``Exports R Us'') has apparently violated Sections 2.803 and 2.815 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by marketing an unauthorized external radio frequency power amplifier.1 We conclude that Exports R Us is apparently liable for forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. Exports R Us operates an Internet Web site offering numerous external radio frequency power amplifiers for sale. The Internet Web address for
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2002/DOC-239161A1.html
  • File No. EB-01-MA-022 Electronics Unlimited ) Miami, Florida ) NAL/Acct. No. 200232700001 ) NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE Released: October 23, 2001 By the Enforcement Bureau, Miami Office: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, we find that Electronics Unlimited apparently violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules,2 by marketing a non-compliant high-power cordless telephone (``Alcon, AT526''). We conclude that Electronics Unlimited is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000). II BACKGROUND 2. On July 20, 2001, agents from the Enforcement Bureau's Miami Office visited Electronics Unlimited, a retail store located at 4995 N.W. 72nd Avenue, Suite 102,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-238992A1.html
  • and First Class U.S. Mail Nacogdoches, TX 75963 CITATION Released: July 7, 2003 By the Enforcement Bureau, Dallas Office: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 to Mr. David P. Pace, Jr. d.b.a. Pacetronics / Pace Marketing for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act,2 and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules.3 2. An investigation by the FCC's Dallas Office revealed that the Internet domain name PACERADIOS.COM is registered to Pace Marketing, David Pace, P.O. Box 631207, Nacogdoches, TX 75963 with Pace Marketing, David Pace listed as the administrative contact. Furthermore, on June 30, 2003, Mr. David P. Pace, Jr. d.b.a. Pacetronics / Pace Marketing through its Internet
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-240649A1.html
  • ) File No. EB-03- DT-742 ) Austintown, Ohio ) Citation No. C20043236001 CITATION Released: October 21, 2003 By the Enforcement Bureau, Detroit Office: 1. This is an official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 to Consumer Electronics Service, Inc. (``Consumer Electronics'') for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act,2 and Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 2.815(b) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').3 2. On July 24, 2003, agents from the Detroit Office of the Federal Communications Commission (``FCC'') inspected radio transmitting equipment at Consumer Electronics, 5407 Mahoning Avenue, Austintown, Ohio. They found two models of a Citizens Band radiofrequency amplifier (``linear'') for sale, in violation of the FCC's marketing Rules. The linears were a Matco
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-240989A1.html
  • CB Shop ) ) Citation No. C20043236002 North Jackson, Ohio ) CITATION Released: October 31, 2003 By the Enforcement Bureau, Detroit Office: 1. This is an official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 to Paliden Communications D/B/A The CB Shop (``Paliden'') for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act,2 and Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 2.815(b) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').3 2. On July 24, 2003, agents from the Detroit Office of the Federal Communications Commission (``FCC'') inspected radio transmitting equipment at Paliden, 12274 Mahoning Avenue, Suite 14, North Jackson, Ohio. They found one model of a Citizens Band radiofrequency amplifier (``linear'') for sale, in violation of the FCC's marketing Rules. The linear was
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-243044A1.html
  • Receipt Requested Clayton, TX 75637 and First Class U.S. Mail CITATION Released: January 7, 2004 By the Enforcement Bureau, Dallas Office: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 to Mr. Jonathan Edward Stone d.b.a. Omnitronics / Pacetronics for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act,2 and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules.3 2. An investigation by the FCC's Dallas Office revealed that on December18, 2003, Mr. Jonathan Edward Stone d.b.a. Omnitronics / Pacetronics through the Internet site(s) www.pacetronics.com (with an address listed on the site as Omnitronics, P.O. Box 42, Clayton, TX 75637) offered for sale, the following thirty (30) non- certified Citizens Band transceivers: NAME MODEL PRICE
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-244171A1.html
  • Inc. ) File No. EB-04-DT- 062 ) Southgate, Michigan ) Citation No. C20043236003 ) CITATION Released: February 20, 2004 By the Enforcement Bureau, Detroit Office: 1. This is an official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 to Palco Electronics, Inc. (``Palco'') for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act,2 and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').3 2. On February 10, 2004, Palco offered for sale at their store located at 18676 Eureka Road, Southgate, Michigan, the following non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceivers: NAME MODEL COST President Lincoln $269.99 Ranger Communications American Spirit (SS-3900 EGHPA) $199.99 Ranger RCI 2950 DX $269.99 Ranger RCI 2970 DX $399.99 Ranger RCI 6900F Turbo $454.99 Ranger
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-245209A1.html
  • Class mail CITATION Citation No.: C200432480001 Released: March 19, 2004 By the Enforcement Bureau, Atlanta Office 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b) of The Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 1 to Mr. Jim Norton, owner of CB Sales and Service, Anniston, Alabama, for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 2 and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules.3 2. An investigation by the FCC's Atlanta Office revealed that on March 11, 2004, you offered for sale at your retail store located at 190E Lenlock Lane, Anniston, Alabama, eight models of non-certified Citizens Band transceivers, namely, a Galaxy model DX66V, a Galaxy model DX 73V, a Galaxy model 48T Big Rig Series, a Galaxy model
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-246125A1.html
  • IA 52773 Return Receipt Requested and First Class U.S. Mail CITATION Released: April 7, 2004 By the Enforcement Bureau, Dallas Office: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 to Mr. Lamont Davidson d.b.a. Walcott CB Sales, Inc. for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act,2 and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules.3 2. An investigation by the FCC's Dallas Office revealed that the Internet domain name walcottcb.com is registered to Walcott CB Sales, Inc., 2940 North Plainview Road, Walcott, Iowa 52773 with Lamont Davidson, Walcott CB Sales, Inc. listed as the administrative and technical contact. Furthermore, on February 24, 2004, Mr. Lamont Davidson d.b.a. Walcott CB Sales, Inc.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-246127A1.html
  • Class mail CITATION Citation No.: C200432980001 Released: March 30, 2004 By the Enforcement Bureau, Seattle Office 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b) of The Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 1 to Mr. Les Elliot, owner of ImTec Electronics of Spokane Valley, WA, for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 2 and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules.3 2. An investigation by the FCC's Seattle Office revealed that on March 11, 2004, you offered for sale at your retail store located at 11200 E. Sprague Ave. non- certified Citizens Band (CB) transceivers, namely, Galaxy Models DX series , and Amateur service transceivers, namely, RCI Models-2950 and 6900F (modifiable) for CB use. According to Commission's
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-246339A1.html
  • EB-04-DT-225 ) Pinconning, Michigan ) Citation No. C20043236004 ) CITATION Released: April 13, 2004 By the Enforcement Bureau, Detroit Office: 1. This is an official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 to Gambler's C.B. & Ham Radio Sales & Service (``Gambler's'') for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act,2 and Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 2.815(b) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').3 2. On April 9, 2004, Gambler's offered for sale at their store located at 4671 North Huron Road, Pinconning, Michigan, the following non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceivers: NAME MODEL COST Ranger RCI 2970 DX $449.95 Ranger RCI 2980 WX $449.95 Ranger RCI 2985 DX $479.95 Ranger RCI 6300 F $329.95 Galaxy DX33HML $198.95
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-248154A1.html
  • Class mail CITATION Citation No.: C200432480002 Released: May 4, 2004 By the Enforcement Bureau, Atlanta Office 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b) of The Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 1 to Mr. Gary Linder, owner of Appalachia Electronics CB Shop, Knoxville, Tennessee, for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 2 and Sections 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules.3 2. An investigation by the FCC's Atlanta Office revealed that on April 27, 2004, you offered for sale at your retail store located at 615 Watt Road, Knoxville, Tennessee, Alabama, four models of non-certified Citizens Band transceivers, namely, three Connex models 3300 HP, and one Galaxy model 66. According to Commission's records, these devices have not
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-249191A1.html
  • ) File No. EB-04-PO- 003 ) Chino, California ) Citation No. C20043292003 CITATION Released: June 24, 2004 By the Resident Agent, Portland Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'')1, to FLECO Corporation (``FLECO'') for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). 2 Investigation by the FCC's Portland Office revealed that on August 5, 2003, FLECO Corporation sold two handheld wireless microphones, model WR-422-U, to the Club Works Sound and Lighting, 3385 Hawthorne Avenue, NE, Salem, Oregon (Invoice Number 425379). These wireless microphones subsequently were sold to and used by The Oasis restaurant and caused
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-249275A1.html
  • No. EB-04-NY- 160 ) Fair Lawn, New Jersey ) Citation No. C20043238002 ) CITATION Released: July 1, 2004 By the Enforcement Bureau, New York Office: 1. This is an official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 to Community Communications, Inc. (``Community'') for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act,2 and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').3 2. On June 25, 2004, Community offered for sale at their store located at 7-05 Fair Lawn Avenue, Fair Lawn, New Jersey, the following non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceivers: NAME MODEL COST Galaxy DX 33L $250 Galaxy DX 44V $300 Galaxy DX 66V $325 Galaxy DX 48T $400 Galaxy Mirage 9900 $375 Galaxy Mirage 6600
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-249276A1.html
  • ) Salem, Oregon ) Citation No. C20043292004 CITATION Released: June 28, 2004 By the Resident Agent, Portland Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'')1, to the Club Works Sound and Lighting (``Club Works'') for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). 2 Investigation by the FCC's Portland Office revealed that on August 5, 2003, the Club Works Sound and Lighting bought two handheld wireless microphones, model WR-422-U, from FLECO Corporation (Invoice Number 425379). These wireless microphones subsequently were sold to and used by The Oasis restaurant and caused interference to amateur radio station WA7ABU
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-251001A1.html
  • Springs, OK 74063 and First Class U.S. Mail CITATION Released: August 6, 2004 By the Enforcement Bureau, Dallas Office: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 to Messrs. Brandon Smith and John Jackson d.b.a. Wholesale CB Radio for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act,2 and Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 2.815(b)&(c) of the Commission's Rules.3 2. An investigation by the FCC's Dallas Office revealed that the Internet domain name wholesalecbradio.com is registered to Smith & Jackson, Inc., 1032 N. Birch, Sand Springs, OK 74063 with John Jackson, brandonjjgs@AOL.COM, Smith & Jackson Inc., 1032 N. Birch, Sand Springs, OK 74063 listed as the administrative and technical contact. Furthermore, on July
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-253693A1.html
  • Requested and First Class U.S. Mail CITATION Released: October 14, 2004 By the Enforcement Bureau, Dallas Office: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 to Chester J. Massie, Jr. / H and Y Electrical Supply Company, Inc. for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act,2 and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules.3 2. On September 20, 2004, the FCC received a confidential report alleging that H and Y Electrical Supply Company was marketing non-certified ``10-meter'' CB transceivers. 3. An investigation by the FCC's Dallas Office revealed that Chester J. Massie, Jr. / H and Y Electrical Supply Company, Inc. is offering for sale in its 2004 / 2005
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-254041A1.html
  • Wilburton, OK 74578 and First Class U.S. Mail CITATION Released: November 2, 2004 By the Enforcement Bureau, Dallas Office: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 to Mr. Jason Lawrence / Total Communications / CB Radio Trader for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act,2 and Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 2.815(b)&(c) of the Commission's Rules.3 2. An investigation by the FCC's Dallas Office revealed that the Internet domain name cbradiotrader.com is registered to Total Communications, P.O. Box 761, Wilburton, OK 74578 with Jason Lawrence, 909 West Main, Wilburton, OK 74578 listed as the administrative and billing contact. Furthermore, on August 10, 2004, Mr. Jason Lawrence / Total Communications /
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-254042A1.html
  • First Class U.S. Mail CITATION Released: October 29, 2004 By the Enforcement Bureau, Dallas Office: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 to Barbara A. Karolides / David C. Rose / Pink Lightning Chrome & CB's, Inc. for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act,2 and Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 2.815(b)&(c) of the Commission's Rules.3 2. An investigation by the FCC's Dallas Office revealed that the Internet domain name pinklightning.com is registered to BigRig Chrome, 526 Smith Lane, Tullahoma, TN 37388 with Andy Beckman, Chrome Helmet Music, 526 Smith Ln, Tullahoma, TN 37388 listed as the administrative and technical contact. Furthermore, on August 25, 2004, Barbara A. Karolides, David
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-254043A1.html
  • provide may be used by the Commission to determine if further enforcement action is required.11 Any knowingly or willfully false statement made in reply to this notice is punishable by fine or imprisonment.12 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Stephen P. Lee Resident Agent Houston Office Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 1 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(5) 2 47 U.S.C. 302a(b) 3 Id. See also 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a)(1), 2.803(a)(2). 4 47 U.S.C. 301 5 See 47 C.F.R. 15.1 et seq 6 Id. 7 47 C.F.R. 15.5(b) 8 47 U.S.C. 333 9 See 47 C.F.R. 1.80(b)(3) 10 47 C.F.R. 15.209 11 See Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(3) 12 18 U.S.C. 1001 References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254043A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254043A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-254258A1.html
  • 68012 ) Citation No. C20043292002 Israel ) CITATION Released: November 10, 2004 By the Resident Agent, San Juan Office, South Central Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 to Netline Communications Technologies, Ltd. (``Netline'') for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act2 and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). 3 2. Investigation by the Commission's San Juan Office of the Enforcement Bureau (``San Juan Office'') revealed that Netline sold twenty-three Netline C-Guard HP, high power units, to Cruz Consulting Group. Ten were sold to Cruz Consulting Group on January 20, 2004 on Invoice 42005, and additional thirteen on February 3, 2004 on Invoice 42015.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-254259A1.html
  • 76463 and First Class U.S. Mail CITATION Released: November 8, 2004 By the Enforcement Bureau, Dallas Office: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 to Clay Allen Thompson and Clay Thompson, Inc., d.b.a. Clay's Little Radio Shop for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act,2 and Sections 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules.3 2. An investigation by the FCC's Dallas Office revealed that the Internet domain name claysradioshop.com is registered to Clay's Little Radio Shop, 70503 IH20, Mingus, TX 76463. Furthermore, on November 4, 2004, Clay Allen Thompson / Clay Thompson, Inc., d.b.a. Clay's Little Radio Shop through the use of Internet site www.claysradioshop.com (with the name and address
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-255239A1.html
  • Chicago, IL 60185 Return Receipt Requested and First Class U.S. Mail CITATION Released: December 6, 2004 By the Enforcement Bureau, Dallas Office: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 to Carl C. Curatola d.b.a. 1 Stop Electronics for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act,2 and Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 2.815(b)&(c) of the Commission's Rules.3 2. An investigation by the FCC's Dallas Office revealed that the Internet domain name 1stopelectronics.com is registered to 1 Stop, Carl C., 1879 N. Neltnor, West Chicago, IL 60185 with an e-mail address listed as xforce151@aol.com. On July 1, 2004, the State of Illinois dissolved the corporation 1 Stop Electronics, Inc. where Carl Curatola
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-255963A1.html
  • RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED AND FIRST CLASS U.S. MAIL File No.: EB-04-BS-085 Citation Acct. No.: C20053226001 CITATION Released: December 1, 2004 By the Enforcement Bureau, Boston Office: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 to Gene A. Fricke for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act,2 and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules.3 2. Investigation by the FCC's Boston Office revealed that on September 13, 2004, Gene A. Fricke offered for sale, via recorded transmission on the Citizen Band frequency 27.185 MHz (Channel 19), models of non-certified Citizens Band transceivers, namely Galaxy transceiver models. According to the Commission's records, these devices have not received a FCC equipment authorization, which
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-257049A1.html
  • No. EB-04-SJ-049 ) San Juan, Puerto Rico ) Citation No. C20043268001 CITATION Released: October 20, 2004 By the San Juan Office, South Central Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 to Cruz Consulting Group (``Cruz'') for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). 2 Investigation by the Commission's San Juan Office of the Enforcement Bureau (``San Juan Office'') between October 13 & 14, 2004 revealed that Cruz sold twenty three transmitters designed to jam or block wireless communications (``mobile phone jammers'') to the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. The President of Cruz,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-257050A1.html
  • Center ) File No. EB- 04-DT-576 ) Dexter, Michigan ) Citation No. C20053236001 ) CITATION Released: January 28, 2005 By the Enforcement Bureau, Detroit Office: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 to TA Travel Center (``TA'') for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act2 and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').3 2. On January 20, 2005, TA offered for sale at their store located at 200 Baker Road, Dexter, Michigan, the following non- certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceivers: NAME MODEL COST Galaxy DX66V $299.99 Galaxy DX44V $249.99 Galaxy DX99V $399.99 According to the Commission's records, these devices have not received an FCC equipment authorization, which is
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-257051A1.html
  • attn: T. J. Gimple 1610 S. Miller Road Citation No. C20053290001 Buckeye, AZ 85326 Citation By the Enforcement Bureau, Los Angeles Office: Released: January 12, 2005 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 to Love's Travel Stop for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act,2 and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules.3 2. Investigation by the FCC's Los Angeles Office revealed that on January 5, 2005, Love's Travel Stop offered for sale at their retail store at Buckeye, AZ, two models of non-certified Citizens Band transceivers, namely, Galaxy (model numbers DX33HML and DX99V). According to the Commission's records, these devices have not received an FCC equipment authorization which
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-257052A1.html
  • 04-LA-006 attn: Bill King 820 W. Pima Citation No. C20053290002 Gila Bend, AZ 85337 Citation By the Enforcement Bureau, Los Angeles Office: Released: January 12, 2005 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 to Love's Travel Stop for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act,2 and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules.3 2. Investigation by the FCC's Los Angeles Office revealed that on January 5, 2005, Love's Travel Stop offered for sale at their retail store at Gila Bend, AZ, two models of non-certified Citizens Band transceivers, namely, Galaxy (model numbers DX33HML and DX99V). According to the Commission's records, these devices have not received an FCC equipment authorization
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-257053A1.html
  • 04-LA-007 attn: Bert Van Dyke P.O. Box 120. Citation No. C20053290003 Quartzsite, AZ 85346 Citation By the Enforcement Bureau, Los Angeles Office: Released: January 12, 2005 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 to Love's Travel Stop for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act,2 and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules.3 2. Investigation by the FCC's Los Angeles Office revealed that on January 5, 2005, Love's Travel Stop offered for sale at their retail store at Quartzsite, AZ, two models of non-certified Citizens Band transceivers, namely, Galaxy (model numbers DX33HML and DX99V). According to the Commission's records, these devices have not received an FCC equipment authorization which
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-257054A1.html
  • EB- 04-LA-008 attn: Eric Carlton 45-761 Dillon Road Citation No. C20053290004 Coachella, CA 92236 Citation By the Enforcement Bureau, Los Angeles Office: Released: January 12, 2005 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 to Love's Travel Stop for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act,2 and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules.3 2. Investigation by the FCC's Los Angeles Office revealed that on January 5, 2005, Love's Travel Stop offered for sale at their retail store at Coachella, CA, two models of non-certified Citizens Band transceivers, namely, Galaxy (model numbers DX33HML and DX99V). According to the Commission's records, these devices have not received an FCC equipment authorization which
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-257055A1.html
  • attn: Randy Harrison 5000 N. Sunland Gin Rd. Citation No.C20053290005 Casa Grande, AZ 85222 Citation By the Enforcement Bureau, Los Angeles Office: Released: January 12, 2005 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 to Love's Travel Stop for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act,2 and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules.3 2. Investigation by the FCC's Los Angeles Office revealed that on January 5, 2005, Love's Travel Stop offered for sale at their retail store at Casa Grande, AZ, two models of non- certified Citizens Band transceivers, namely, Galaxy (model numbers DX33HML and DX99V). According to the Commission's records, these devices have not received an FCC equipment
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-257218A1.html
  • Return Receipt requested and Soap Lake, WA 98851 First Class mail CITATION Citation No.: C20043298002 Released: May 7, 2004 By the Enforcement Bureau, Seattle Office 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b) of The Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 1 to The Quack Shack, for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 2 Section 2.803(a)(1), Section 2.815(b), and Section 2.815(c) of the Commission's Rules.3 2. An investigation by the FCC's Seattle Office revealed that on May 4, 2004, you offered for sale through your Internet site thequackshack.com, non-certified Citizens Band (CB) transceivers, namely, Galaxy Models DX series, Amateur service transceivers, namely, RCI Models- (modifiable) for CB use, and External Radio Frequency Power Amplifiers (or amplifier
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-257375A1.html
  • Perrysburg, OH ) Citation No. C20053238001 ) CITATION Released: March 8, 2005 By the District Director, New York Office, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 to Eugene Dezanett d.b.a. Pro Class Electronics for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act,2 and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').3 2. On February 2, 2005, Eugene Dezanett d.b.a. Pro Class Electronics, through the Internet site www.proclassradio.com offered for sale, the following sixty (60) non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceivers: NAME MODEL PRICE DESCRIPTION Connex 3300 $224.99 ``Similar to Galaxy DX33HML'' Connex 3300 HP $239.99 Connex 4400 $249.99 Connex 4400 HP $274.99 ``8 Band modifiable'' Connex 4800
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-258048A1.html
  • New Jersey, 08804 ) Citation No. C20053238002 ) CITATION Released: April 5, 2005 By the District Director, New York Office, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 to Travel Centers of America (``TA'') for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act2 and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').3 2. Investigation by the FCC's New York Office revealed that on March 15, 2005, TA offered for sale at their store located at 975 SR 173, Bloomsbury, New Jersey 08804, the following non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceivers: NAME MODEL COST Galaxy DX66V $299.99 Galaxy DX44V $249.99 According to the Commission's records, these devices have not
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-259063A1.html
  • ) NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE Released: May 24, 2005 By the District Director, Tampa Field Office, South Central Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Hightech CB Shop (``Hightech'') apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'')2 by offering for sale a non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceiver.3 We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Act,4 that Hightech is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. On May 9, 2001, the Commission's Tampa Office of the Enforcement Bureau (``Tampa Office'') issued a Citation
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-259804A1.html
  • CB Candy ) ) Ontario, California CITATION Released: June 28, 2005 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 to Charles E. Vance, III d/b/a CB Candy, for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act,2 Section 2.803(a)(1), Section 2.815(b), and Section 2.815(c) of the Commission's Rules.3 2. An investigation by the Commission's Los Angeles Office revealed that on June 28, 2005, you offered for sale non-certified Citizens Band (CB) transceivers, namely, Galaxy Models DX series, Amateur service transceivers, namely, RCI Models- (modifiable) for CB use, and External Radio Frequency Power Amplifiers (or amplifier kits) for CB use.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-260457A1.html
  • NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE Released: July 27, 2005 By the Resident Agent, Portland Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that TravelCenters of America (``TravelCenters'') in Troutdale, Oregon, apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 302(b) of the Commissions Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'')2 by offering for sale a non- certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceiver. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Act,3 TravelCenters is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000).4 II. BACKGROUND 2. On October 25, 2001, an agent from the Enforcement Bureau's Portland Resident Agent Office (``Portland Office'') visited
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-260949A1.html
  • No. EB-04-DT- 329 ) Litchfield, OH ) Citation No. C20053236002 ) CITATION Released: September 9, 2005 By the District Director, Detroit Office, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 to Litchfield Radio (``Litchfield'') for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act,2 and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').3 2. An investigation by the Commission's Detroit Office revealed that on July 21, 2005, Litchfield Radio offered for sale at its store in Litchfield, Ohio, the following non- certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceivers: NAME MODEL PRICE Cobra 150 GTL DX $199.95 Connex CX 3300 $209.95 Connex CX 3300 HP $249.95 Connex CX 4300 HP $309.95
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-261721A1.html
  • Chad Jolley ) ) Citation No.: C20063248001 Sparta, Tennessee 38583 ) CITATION Released: October 14, 2005 By the District Director, Atlanta Office, South Central Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 to Chad Jolley for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 2.815(b) and (c) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').2 2. Investigation by the Commission's Atlanta Office of the Enforcement Bureau (``Atlanta Office'') revealed that on August 2, 2005, Mr. Jolley offered for sale in the Beavis CB & PC Shop the following twenty-eight (28) non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceivers: NAME /MODEL PRICE Magnum S-3 $255.00 Magnum S-9 $350.00 Galaxy 95T
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-262094A1.html
  • Shop ) ) Boise, Idaho ) CITATION Released: October 31, 2005 By the Resident Agent, Portland Resident Agent Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 to Bradley Lynn Kinney, d/b/a Primerush CB Shop, for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act,2 Section 2.803(a)(1), Section 2.815(b), and Section 2.815(c) of the Commission's Rules.3 2. An investigation by the Commission's Portland Office revealed that on September 29, 2005, you offered for sale non-certified Citizens Band (CB) transceivers, namely, General Model Lee, Magnum Model S-6, and External Radio Frequency Power Amplifiers, namely Power Devil and Palomar Model Elite 250HD for CB use. According to the Commission's
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-262555A1.html
  • No: C20063238002 Holtsville, New York 11742 ) CITATION Released: November 29, 2005 By the District Director, New York Office, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 to Mr. Bob Paul d.b.a. LP Electronics for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act,2 and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').3 2. An investigation by agents in the FCC's New York Office revealed that on October 27, 2005, Mr. Bob Paul d.b.a. LP Electronics offered for sale at his retail store located at 1031 Waverly Avenue, Holtsville, New York, six (6) models of non-certified Citizens Band (CB) transceivers, namely: NAME MODEL PRICE DESCRIPTION GALAXY DX 33
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-262942A1.html
  • NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE Released: December 21, 2005 By the Acting District Director, Seattle District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Clegg Industries, Inc. (``Clegg'') in Torrance, California, apparently repeatedly violated Section 302(b) of the Commissions Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 and Section 2.803(a)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'')2 by importing and marketing non-authorized radio frequency devices. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Act,3 Clegg is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. On April 10, 2005, a Western Region agent purchased a ``Space Needle'' FM radio at the Space Needle gift shop
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-262944A1.html
  • COP-USA, Inc. ) ) Citation No.: C20063238003 Flushing, New York ) CITATION Released: December 22, 2005 By the District Director, New York Office, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 to COP-USA, Inc. for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act2 and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'')3 for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. As explained below, future violations of the Rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. 2. Investigation by the FCC's New York Office revealed that on August 24, 2005, COP-USA, Inc., at its store located at 33-11 College Point Blvd., Flushing, New
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-262945A1.html
  • ) Citation No.: C20063290001 City of Industry, California ) CITATION Released: December 22, 2005 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 to COP-USA Inc. for violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and Section 2.803(a)2 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. 2. Investigation by the FCC's Los Angeles Office revealed that on November 2, 2005, COP-USA, on its website and at its City of Industry location, marketed
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-263340A1.html
  • Citation No.: C20063280002 Commerce City, Colorado ) CITATION Released: January 18, 2006 By the District Director, Denver District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 to Sapp Bros. Truck Stops, Inc., for violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and Section 2.803(a)2 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') for marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. 2. Investigation by the FCC's Denver Office revealed that on December 2, 2005, Sapp Bros Truck Stops, Inc., at its Commerce City location, marketed an
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-263341A1.html
  • ) ) Citation No.: C20063290002 Laguna Niguel, CA ) CITATION Released: January 20, 2006 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 to Jason Kaltenbach, d/b/a Metamerchant, for violation of 302(b)2 of the Act and Section 2.803(a) of the Commissions Rules.3 2. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that on September 1, 2005, Jason Kaltenbach d/b/a Metamerchant, offered for sale ``Field Programmable VHF Portable Radio-MURS- Full Range 136-174 MHz'' and ``Key Pad Programmable UHF Portable Radio w/GMRS Band 400-470 MHz.'' According to Commission records, these devices have not received an FCC equipment authorization which
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-263483A1.html
  • his address of record. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dennis Loria District Director Boston Office Northeast Region Enforcement Bureau _________________________ 1 47 U.S.C. 301. 2 47 U.S.C. 503(b). 3 Fricke's CB station has been the subject of prior FCC investigations. On December 1, 2004, the Boston Office issued a Citation to Mr. Fricke for violating Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Rules by advertising for sale non- certified CB transceivers. On December 3, 2004, in response to complaints of continuous operation on CB Channel 19, the Boston Office issued a warning letter to Mr. Fricke for failure to limit the length of communications as required under Section 95.416 of the Rules, and imposed restrictions on the operation of any
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-264046A1.html
  • Office, South Central Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Love's Travel Stops and Country Stores, Inc. (``Loves'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) for willful and repeated violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').2 Specifically, we find Loves apparently liable for offering for sale radio frequency devices without the required Commission equipment authorization. II. BACKGROUND 2. Section 302 of the Act authorizes the Commission to make reasonable regulations, consistent with the public interest, governing the interference potential of equipment that emits radio frequency energy,3 and prohibits, inter alia, the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-264049A1.html
  • 2by2security.com. ) ) Citation No.: C20063290003 Los Angeles, California ) CITATION Released: February 24, 2006 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 to 2by2security.com for violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and Section 2.803(a)2 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. 2. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that on February 1, 2006, 2by2security.com, on its website, marketed unauthorized radio devices, specifically five models of 900MHz to 1.23 GHz wireless cameras, models LJ109, LJ129, LJ117, LJ118 and LJ119, and associated receivers, which have
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-264507A1.html
  • Released: March 22, 2006 By the District Director, Los Angeles Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Charles E. Vance, III d/b/a/ CB Candy Electronics (Vance) in Ontario, California, apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 302(b) of the Commissions Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 2.815(c) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by offering for sale non-certified Citizens Band ("CB") transceivers and external RF power amplifiers. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Act, that Vance is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. On June 28, 2005, an agent from the Enforcement Bureau's Los
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-264848A1.html
  • NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE Released: March 31, 2006 By the District Director, Detroit Office, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Gambler's CB & Ham Radio Sales & Service ("Gambler's") apparently willfully violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934 as amended, ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (the "Rules"), by offering for sale non-certified Citizens Band ("CB") transceivers. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Act, that Gambler's is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. On April 5, 2004, the FCC Enforcement Bureau's Detroit Field Office ("Detroit Office") received information that Gambler's
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-264948A1.html
  • NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE Released: March 31, 2006 By the District Director, Detroit Office, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Gambler's CB & Ham Radio Sales & Service ("Gambler's") apparently willfully violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934 as amended, ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (the "Rules"), by offering for sale non-certified Citizens Band ("CB") transceivers. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Act, that Gambler's is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. On April 5, 2004, the FCC Enforcement Bureau's Detroit Field Office ("Detroit Office") received information that Gambler's
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-265629A1.html
  • Director, Detroit Office, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Wesley ("Wes") Noe, d.b.a. GI Joe's Radio Electronics and GI Joe's CB Radio (collectively referred to herein as "GI Joe's") apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934 as amended, ("Act"), and Sections 2.803(a)(1), 2.815(b), and 2.815(c) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by offering for sale non-certified Citizens Band ("CB") transceivers and external radio frequency ("RF") power amplifiers. Specifically, Noe willfully and repeatedly violated Sections 2.803(a)(1), 2.815(b), and 2.815(c) of the Rules by offering for sale non-certified CB transceivers and RF power amplifiers on the GI Joe's Radio Electronics' web site. Noe also willfully
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-265673A1.html
  • ) Citation No.: C20063290004 Ontario, California ) ) CITATION Released: May 10, 2006 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to CB & Ham Radio Shop, for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, Section 2.803(a)(1), Section 2.815(b), and Section 2.815(c) of the Commission's Rules. 2. An investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that on April 13, 2006, CB & Ham Radio Shop offered for sale non-certified Citizens Band ("CB") transceivers, namely, Galaxy Models DX88 & DX99 modified for CB use, and Texas Star External Radio Frequency Power Amplifiers for CB use. According
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-265693A1.html
  • Citation No.: C20063290005 Centerville, OH ) CITATION Released: May 17, 2006 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to MCM - In One ("MCM") for violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. 2. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that on March 7, 2006, MCM, in a printed mail order catalog which was copyrighted 2006 and sent to a California address, and on its website, marketed an unauthorized radio device, specifically Defender model 82-6330
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-265891A1.html
  • Electronic ) Citation No.: C20063290006 Commerce, California, 90040 ) ) CITATION Released: June 6, 2006 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to Camacho Electronic, for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1)of the Commission's Rules. 2. An investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that on May 4, 2006, Camacho Electronic offered for sale non-certified Citizens Band ("CB") transceivers, namely, Galaxy Model DX99 and other non-certified Galaxy models. According to Commission's records, these devices have not received an FCC equipment authorization which is required for Citizens Band transmitters marketed in
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-266080A1.html
  • ) Citation No.: C200632400002 Milton, PA 17847 ) CITATION Released: April 12, 2006 By the District Director, Philadelphia Office, Office, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to Brian Snook/All American Plazas, Inc. for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commissions Rules. 2. Investigation by the FCC's Philadelphia Office revealed that on February 23, 2006, Brian Snook/All American Plazas, Inc. offered for sale the following non-certified Citizen Band transceivers: Name Model Millennium 2002 Magnum S-9 Connex 4800 DXL President General LEE According to the Commission's records, these devices have not received an FCC equipment authorization which is required
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-266229A1.html
  • ) ) Citation No.: C200632400002 Milton, PA 17847 ) CITATION Released: June 23, 2006 By the Acting District Director, Philadelphia Office, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to All American Plazas, Inc. for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules. 2. An investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Philadelphia Office revealed that on February 23, 2006, All American Plazas, Inc. offered for sale the following non-certified Citizen Band transceivers: Make Model Millennium 2002 Magnum S-9 Connex 4800 DXL President General LEE According to the Commission's records, these devices have not received an FCC equipment authorization which is
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-267102A1.html
  • Avenue ) Citation No.: C20063294001 Highland, California 92346 ) CITATION Released: August 23, 2006 By the District Director, San Diego District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to Sentry Tech Systems for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules. 2. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's San Diego Office and reports from County of Riverside personnel revealed that on August 1, 2006, the source of harmful radio interference to a Public Safety two-way radio communications system in the 820 MHz band was a wireless video camera transmitting in the same frequency band. The video camera was
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-267710A1.html
  • 500 ) Citation No.: C20063270006 Tampa, FL 33618 ) CITATION Released: September 28, 2006 By the District Director, Tampa Office, South Central Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation, issued to Coverage Solutions Corporation ("CSC") pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 2.925(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). 2. Investigation by the Commission's Tampa Office of the Enforcement Bureau ("Tampa Office") determined that CSC imported several dual band radio frequency amplifiers into the United States in early January 2006. All of the units in question were of the same model, and none were labeled with the required FCC Identification ("FCC ID").
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-268222A1.html
  • ) ) Citation No.: C20073280001 Coral Springs, FL 33071 ) ) CITATION Released: October 19, 2006 By the District Director, Denver District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to DL Management, Inc., for violation of 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules. 2. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Denver Office revealed that on October 1, 2006, DL Management offered for sale multiple "DMX DM-306 Wireless Microphones," eBay Item number 280005050103, seller "hwy836," on the eBay auction site. According to Commission records, these devices have not received an FCC equipment authorization which is required for transmitters marketed in the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-268223A1.html
  • ) Citation No.: C20073290001 Van Nuys, California ) CITATION Released: October 20, 2006 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to All Electronics Corporation for violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. 2. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that on September 30, 2006, All Electronics Corporation, marketed unauthorized radio devices, specifically wireless cameras Model 203CA, and associated receivers, which have not been certificated for sale or use in the United States. 3. Section
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-268422A1.html
  • LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE Released: November 9, 2006 By the District Director, Los Angeles Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Jason Kaltenbach ("Kaltenbach") d/b/a/ Metamerchant in Laguna Nigel, California, apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 302(b) of the Commissions Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by offering for sale non-certified VHF and UHF transceivers. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Act, that Kaltenbach is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. On September 1, 2005, an agent from the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office ("Los Angeles Office") visited Ebay's
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-268623A1.html
  • No.: C20073292001 Clackamas, Oregon ) ) CITATION Released: November 16, 2006 By the Resident Agent, Portland Resident Agent Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to Rod Irvin, d/b/a D&R Communications, Inc., for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules. 2. An investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Portland Resident Agent Office revealed that on September 5, 2006, Rod Irvin, d/b/a D&R Communications, Inc., offered for sale non-certified Citizens Band ("CB") transceivers, namely, Cobra 150 GTL DX and Cobra 200 GTL DX models. According to the Commission's records, these devices have not received an FCC equipment authorization
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-268873A1.html
  • No. C20073238003 New York, NY ) CITATION Released: November 29, 2006 By the District Director, New York District Office, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to S & D Consulting Int. Ltd. for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). 2. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's New York Office revealed that S & D Consulting Int. Ltd. marketed electronic devices on its website, specifically, ceremonial bugle insert models CB2003US and CB2006UK. On September 25, 2006, a Commission agent visited the corporate office of S & D Consulting Int. Ltd., and confirmed that the ceremonial bugle
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-268874A1.html
  • Citation No.: C20073290002 Santa Barbara, CA, 93105 ) CITATION Released: November 28, 2006 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to John M. Friese ("Friese") for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Rules. 2. An investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that on August 29, 2006, Friese marketed various FM broadcast transmitters (88-108 MHz) assembled from Ramsey Electronics kits, models FM100B, FM25B and FM30B. According to the Commission's records, these devices have not received an FCC equipment authorization, which is required for FM transmitters marketed in the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-268875A1.html
  • Chi ) ) Citation No.: C20073290003 West Hills, California ) CITATION Released: December 1, 2006 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to Jalin Chi for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. 2. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that on November 18, 2006, Jalin Chi marketed unauthorized radio frequency devices, specifically wireless cameras, and associated receivers, operating on 1.2 GHz, which have not been certificated for sale or use in the United States.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-268876A1.html
  • Yu ) ) Citation No.: C20073290004 El Monte, California ) CITATION Released: December 1, 2006 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to Guang Yu for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. 2. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that on November 18, 2006, Guang Yu, marketed unauthorized radio frequency devices, specifically wireless cameras, and associated receivers, operating on 1.2 GHz, which have not been certificated for sale or use in the United States.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-268877A1.html
  • Truong ) ) Citation No.: C20073290005 Anaheim, California ) CITATION Released: December 1, 2006 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to Dat Phan Truong for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. 2. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that on November 18, 2006, Dat Phan Truong marketed unauthorized radio frequency devices, specifically wireless cameras, Model AJ-809S, and associated receivers, operating on 1.2 GHz, which have not been certificated for sale or use in
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-269020A1.html
  • 12, 2006 By the District Director, Tampa Office, South Central Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Ben Metzger dba 1 Stop Communications / 1 Stop CB Shop in Titusville, Florida apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 302(b) of the Commissions Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by offering for sale non-certified Citizens Band ("CB") transceivers. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Act, that Mr. Metzger is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. On March 21, 2006, the Commission's Tampa Office of the Enforcement Bureau ("Tampa Office") issued Mr. Metzger
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-269022A1.html
  • ) Citation No.: C20073294001 Garden Grove, California 92845 ) CITATION Released: November 16, 2006 By the District Director, San Diego District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to Caught On Tape for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules. 2. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's San Diego Office and reports from Federal Aviation Administration personnel revealed that on September 13, 2006, the source of harmful radio interference to a Tactical Air Navigation (TACAN) system in the 1070 MHz band was a transmitter used in a video surveillance system in the same frequency band. The transmitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-269176A1.html
  • Enterprises ) Bartonsville, PA ) ) Citation No.: C20073232001 ) CITATION Released: December 20, 2006 By the District Director, Chicago District Office, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to SJT Enterprises ("SJT") for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules. 2. On November 11, 2006, an agent from this office observed SJT offering for sale non-certified 1.2 GHz video transmitters at "Trainfest 2006," which was held at the Wisconsin State Fair Grounds in West Allis, Wisconsin. The agent also observed SJT offer for sale video transmitters that operate on 2.4 GHz. Your web site was also
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-269802A1.html
  • Electronics ) ) Citation No. C20073238006 Mount Vernon, NY ) CITATION Released: January 17, 2007 By the District Director, New York District Office, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to M.J. Electronics for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). 2. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's New York Office revealed that M.J. Electronics offered for sale on its website various non-certified 1.2 GHz video transmitters, and also video transmitters that operate on 2.4 GHz. The transmitters range in output power from 100 mW to 1500 mW, and include models MJ-1200MC, MJ-2400VHT, MJ-808HP, MJ-2400VH, and MJ-VT07WP.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-269803A1.html
  • ) Citation No.: C20073296002 Red Bluff, CA 96080 ) CITATION Released: January 17, 2007 By the District Director, San Francisco District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to Yak Yak Shack for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules. 2. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's San Francisco Office revealed that on September 19, 2006, Yak Yak Shack offered for sale non-certified Citizens Band ("CB") transceivers, namely, Galaxy Models DX95T and Galaxy DX99V, and Ranger Models RCI 2950DX and RCI 2970DX. According to the Commission's records, these devices have not received a FCC equipment authorization which
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-269877A1.html
  • Supply ) ) Citation No.: C20073290006 Richardson, Texas ) CITATION Released: January 23, 2007 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to Self Defense Supply for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. 2. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that on December 7, 2006, Self Defense Supply via their internet website, marketed unauthorized radio devices, specifically wireless cameras Model AJ-809S and AJ007S, and associated receivers, which have not been certificated for sale or use
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-269878A1.html
  • PepBoys Auto ) ) Citation No.: C20073290007 Artesia, California ) CITATION Released: January 23, 2007 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to PepBoys Auto for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. 2. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that on December 12 2006, PepBoys Auto marketed unauthorized radio frequency devices, specifically Music Gear Audio Transmitter, Model MP1058, which have not been certificated for sale or use in the United States. 3. Section 302(b)
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-269879A1.html
  • ) ) Citation No.: C20073290008 Duarte, California ) CITATION Released: January 23, 2007 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to Spittys Wholesale Specialty Products for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. 2. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that on November 25, 2006, at the Crossroads of the West Gun Show at the Orange County Fairgrounds, Spittys Wholesale Specialty Products, marketed unauthorized radio devices, specifically wireless surveillance cameras manufactured by Lianyida (LYD) Corporation,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-269880A1.html
  • ORVAC Electronics ) ) Citation No.: C20073290009 Fullerton, California ) CITATION Released: January 23, 2007 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to ORVAC Electronics for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. 2. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that on November 22, 2006, ORVAC Electronics, marketed unauthorized radio devices, specifically multiple models of wireless surveillance cameras manufactured by LYD, and COP Security, and associated receivers, which have not been certificated for sale or
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-269881A1.html
  • DuVac Electronics ) ) Citation No.: C20073290010 Pasadena, California ) CITATION Released: January 23, 2007 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to DuVac Electronics for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. 2. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that on November 6, 2006, DuVac Electronics marketed unauthorized radio devices, specifically wireless cameras Model 2YD802CH and COP2400BTJ, and associated receivers, which have not been certificated for sale or use in the United States. 3.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-269882A1.html
  • Citation No.: C20073294002 Marina Del Rey, California 90292 ) CITATION Released: January 22, 2007 By the District Director, San Diego District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to Ditec Digital Systems for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules. 2. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's San Diego Office and reports from Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA") personnel revealed that on October 27, 2006, the source of harmful radio interference to the FAA's Distance Measuring Equipment ("DME") system in the 1080 MHz band was a transmitter used in a video surveillance system operating in the same frequency
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-270447A1.html
  • ) ) Citation No.: C20073290011 Huntington Beach, CA ) CITATION Released: February 6, 2007 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to Big Lots, Inc., for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. 2. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that on December 14, 2006, Big Lots, Inc., at their retail store #4088, 21082 Beach Blvd., Huntington Beach, CA 92648 , marketed unauthorized radio devices, specifically, Travel Solutions, wireless optical mouse, item #550-20-531, which has
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-270627A1.html
  • No.: C20073290012 Nacogdoches, TX ) ) CITATION Released: February 14, 2007 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to David Pace Jr., d/b/a 4:13 Electronics for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803(a)(1), 2.815(b), 2.815(c) of the Commission's Rules. 2. An investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles District Office revealed that on December 7, 2006, David Pace Jr., d/b/a 4:13 Electronic, offered for sale non-certified Citizens Band ("CB") transceivers, namely, Galaxy Model DX 99V and external power amplifiers, namely, Texas Star 250 HDV, 400V and 667V, and others. According to the Commission's
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-270629A1.html
  • Inc. ) ) Citation No.: C20073290013 Rancho Cucamonga, California ) CITATION Released: February 14, 2007 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to Monoprice, Inc. for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. 2. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that on January 19, 2007, Monoprice, Inc., marketed unauthorized radio devices, specifically wireless surveillance cameras, Model ZT-809A, and associated receivers, which have not been certificated for sale or use in the United States. 3. Section
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-270630A1.html
  • No.: EB-06-LA-309 CensusPC ) ) Citation No.: C20073290014 Walnut, California ) CITATION Released: February 14, 2007 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to CensusPC for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. 2. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that on January 19, 2007, CensusPC, marketed unauthorized radio devices, specifically wireless surveillance cameras, Model SBT-SCNV, and associated receivers, which have not been certificated for sale or use in the United States. 3. Section 302(b)
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-270804A1.html
  • Oklahoma 73075 ) CITATION Released: September 29, 2006 By the District Director, Dallas Office, South Central Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to Stephen L. Tork d.b.a. Hotshot CB II ("Stephen L. Tork") for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803(a)(1), 2.815(b) and 2.815(c) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). 2. Investigation by the Commission's Dallas Office of the Enforcement Bureau ("Dallas Office") revealed that on July 21, 2006, Stephen L. Tork offered for sale non-certified Citizens Band ("CB") transceivers, namely, Galaxy models DX55V and DX48T, Superstar model 121, General model AP Hill, and Northpoint model NT-9-HP. These transceivers did not have
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-270805A1.html
  • By the District Director, Dallas Office, South Central Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to Cindy Tork, Stephen L. Tork, Fred Cordell, Kimla Cordell d.b.a. CBs At Their Best ("CBs At Their Best") for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803(a)(1), 2.815(b) and 2.815(c) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). 2. Investigation by the Commission's Dallas Office of the Enforcement Bureau revealed that on July 19, 2006, CBs At Their Best, through the use of internet website www.cbsattheirbest.net, offered for sale thirty non-certified Citizens Band ("CB") transceivers as follows: Brand Model Price Connex 3300 $185.00 Connex 3300HP $220.00 Connex 3300LEHP $230.00 Connex
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-270806A1.html
  • ) CITATION Released: September 29, 2006 By the District Director, Dallas Office, South Central Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to Joann Anson d.b.a. Striker Antennas and as Striker CB Shop ("Joann Anson") for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). 2. An investigation by the Commission's Dallas Office of the Enforcement Bureau revealed that on July 20, 2006, Joann Anson offered for sale non-certified Citizens Band ("CB") transceivers, namely, Connex model 4300HP, Galaxy models DX45MP, DX55T and DX99V, General model Lee, and Magnum models S3, S380, S6 and S9. These transceivers did not have FCC
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-270807A1.html
  • ) Salem, Oregon 97302 ) ) CITATION Released: February 23, 2007 By the Resident Agent, Portland Resident Agent Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to Michael T. Kersnowski d/b/a RadioActive Radio for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803(a)(1), 2.815(b) and 2.815(c) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). 2. Investigation by the Commission's Portland Resident Agent Office of the Enforcement Bureau revealed that on November 28, 2006, RadioActive Radio, through the use of internet website www.RadioActiveRadios.com, offered for sale forty-four non-certified Citizens Band ("CB") transceivers as follows: Brand Model Connex 3300 HP Connex 4600 Turbo Connex 4300 HP 300 Connex
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-270819A1.html
  • services and may subject the operator to severe penalties, this warning emphasizes the importance of complying strictly with these legal requirements. Section 302(b) of the Act provides "No person shall manufacture, import, sell, offer for sale, or ship devices or home electronic equipment and systems, or use devices, which fail to comply with regulations promulgated pursuant to this section." Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Rules provides that "...no person shall sell or lease, or offer for sale or lease (including advertising for sale or lease), or import, ship or distribute for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease, any radio frequency device unless: (1) In the case of a device subject to certification, such device has been
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-270820A1.html
  • services and may subject the operator to severe penalties, this warning emphasizes the importance of complying strictly with these legal requirements. Section 302(b) of the Act provides "No person shall manufacture, import, sell, offer for sale, or ship devices or home electronic equipment and systems, or use devices, which fail to comply with regulations promulgated pursuant to this section." Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Rules provides that "...no person shall sell or lease, or offer for sale or lease (including advertising for sale or lease), or import, ship or distribute for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease, any radio frequency device unless: (1) In the case of a device subject to certification, such device has been
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-272112A1.html
  • ) Battle Creek, MI ) Citation No. C20073236001 ) CITATION Released: March 19, 2007 By the District Director, Detroit Office, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to Te-Khi Travel Court, Inc. ("Te-Khi") for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). 2. An investigation by the Commission's Detroit Office revealed that on February 16, 2007, Te-Khi offered for sale at its store at 15874 11 Mile Road, Battle Creek, Michigan, the following non-certified Citizens Band ("CB") transceivers: NAME MODEL PRICE QUANTITY Cobra 200 GTL DX $319.95 1 Cobra 150 GTL DX $229.89 4 Ranger RCI-6300 F25
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-272196A1.html
  • ) ) Citation No.: C20073296003 Los Banos, California ) CITATION Released: March 29, 2007 By the District Director, San Francisco District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to R. P. Communications for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules. 2. An investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's San Francisco Office revealed that on January 24, 2007, R.P. Communications offered for sale non-certified Citizens Band ("CB") transceivers, namely, Cobra models 150 GTL DX and Cobra 200 GTL DX , Ranger RCI2950DX, Superstar 36, and the General models General Hill, General Longstreet and the General Sherman. When asked
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-273556A1.html
  • C20073238009 Montgomery, New York 12549 ) CITATION May 15, 2007 By the District Director, New York Office, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to Mr. Richard Musa DBA Blade Runner Knife Company for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). 2. An investigation by the FCC's New York Office revealed that on May 5, 2007, Mr. Richard Musa DBA Blade Runner Knife Company offered for sale at his retail store located at 202 Montgomery Road, Montgomery, New York, three (3) models of non-certified Citizens Band (CB) transceivers, namely: NAME MODEL PRICE DESCRIPTION COBRA 29LTD $165.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-274074A1.html
  • Inc. ) ) Citation No.: C20073290021 Cerritos, CA ) CITATION Released: June 4, 2007 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to Big Lots, Inc., for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. 2. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that on May 17, 2007, Big Lots, Inc., at their retail store #4076, in Cerritos, California, marketed unauthorized radio devices, specifically, the Emerson Ultimate Headset, model MH2001, which has not been certificated for sale or
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-275913A1.html
  • Citation No.: C20073270009 Hudson, Florida 34785 ) CITATION Released: August 6, 2007 By the District Director, Tampa Office, South Central Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to High Point Electronics ("High Point Electronics"), for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). 2. An investigation by the Commission's Tampa Office of the Enforcement Bureau ("Tampa Office") revealed that on February 15, 2007, High Point Electronics offered for sale non-certified Citizens Band ("CB") transceivers. A partial listing follows: Brand Name Model Price Galaxy DX-55V $269.99 Connex 3300-HP $299.99 Connex 4300-HP $399.99 These transceivers did not have FCC ID
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-275914A1.html
  • ) Citation No.: C20073270010 Wildwood, Florida 34785 ) CITATION Released: August 6, 2007 By the District Director, Tampa Office, South Central Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to Mesa CB, Inc. ("Mesa "), for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). 2. An investigation by the Commission's Tampa Office of the Enforcement Bureau ("Tampa Office") revealed that on February 15, 2007, Mesa offered for sale non-certified Citizens Band ("CB") transceivers. A partial listing follows: Brand Name Model Price Galaxy DX-33HML $250.00 Galaxy DX-66V $350.00 Connex 3300-HP $300.00 These transceivers did not have FCC ID labels indicating
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-275915A1.html
  • ) Citation No.: C20073270011 Seffner, Florida 33584 ) CITATION Released: August 6, 2007 By the District Director, Tampa Office, South Central Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to Racoon's CB Repair, Inc. ("Racoon"), for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). 2. Investigation by the Commission's Tampa Office of the Enforcement Bureau ("Tampa Office") revealed that on February 5, 2007, Racoon offered for sale non-certified Citizens Band ("CB") transceivers. A partial listing follows: Brand Name Model Price Galaxy DX-33HML $260.00 Galaxy DX-44 $270.00 Connex 3300-HP $280.00 According to Commission records, these devices have not received an
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-276378A1.html
  • LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE Released: August 28, 2007 By the District Director, Denver Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that CB Shop & More, LLLP ("CB Shop"), in Loveland, Colorado, apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by offering for sale a non-certified Citizens Band ("CB") transceiver. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Act, CB Shop is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. On November 25, 2002, an agent from the Enforcement Bureau's Denver Office inspected the CB Shop in
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-277177A1.html
  • ) ) Citation No.: C20073296030 Fresno, California 93722 ) CITATION Released: September 25, 2007 By the District Director, San Francisco District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to Red Monkey Electronics for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules. 2. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's San Francisco Office revealed that on August 30, 2007, Red Monkey Electronics offered for sale non-certified Citizens Band ("CB") transceivers, namely, Galaxy Model DX44V and Ranger Model RCI-2970. According to the Commission's records, these devices have not received a FCC equipment authorization which is required for Citizens Band transmitters marketed
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-277836A1.html
  • District Director, Los Angeles Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that David P. Pace Jr. d/b/a/ Pacetronics / Pace Marketing and 4:13 Electronics / Pacetronics ("Pace"), in Nacogdoches, Texas, apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by offering for sale a non-certified Citizens Band ("CB") transceiver. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Act, Pace is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. In September and December of 2006, and in January of 2007, an investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-277840A1.html
  • Citation No.: C20073294004 Spring Valley, California 91978 ) CITATION Released: May 22, 2007 By the District Director, San Diego District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to Southern California Microwave, Inc. for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules. 2. Investigation on April 4, 2007, by the Enforcement Bureau's San Diego Office revealed that Southern California Microwave, Inc., had offered for sale an uncertified wireless video camera transmitting in the 1845 MHz band. 3. Section 302(b) of the Act states:"[n]o person shall manufacture, import, sell, offer for sale, or ship devices or home electronic equipment
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-277887A1.html
  • Inc. ) ) Citation No. C20083290002 Palatine, Illinois ) CITATION Released: October 30, 2007 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to MATCO, Inc., for violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. 2. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that on October 23, 2007, MATCO, Inc., marketed unauthorized radio devices, specifically wireless cameras Models ASK-1204TR (operating on 1.2 GHz) and ASK-2004T-1.7 (operating on 1.7 GHz), and associated receivers, which have not been certificated for
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-280562A1.html
  • ) Citation No.: C200832900006 Fountain Valley, CA ) CITATION Released: February 29, 2008 By the Acting Interim District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to Fry's Electronics, for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. 2. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that on February 21, 2008, Fry's Electronics, at their retail store in Fountain Valley, California, marketed unauthorized radio devices, specifically, the Zennox, 5 in 1 Wireless Headphones,(XXX) XXXX-XXXX6, which has not been certificated for sale
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-281214A1.html
  • FOR FORFEITURE Released: March 28, 2008 By the Resident Agent, Portland Resident Agent Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Michael T. Kersnowski ("Kersnowski"), d/b/a www.radioactiveradios.com, in Salem, Oregon, apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by offering for sale non-certified Citizens Band ("CB") transceivers. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), that Kersnowski is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. On November 28, 2006, the Enforcement Bureau's Portland Resident Agent Office ("Portland
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-282180A1.html
  • ) Idaho Falls, Idaho ) Citation No.: C200832920008 ) CITATION Released: May 6, 2008 By the Resident Agent, Portland Resident Agent Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to Dad's Travel Center for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). 2. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Portland Resident Agent Office revealed that on April 2, 2008, Dad's Travel Center offered for sale the following non-certified Citizens Band ("CB") transceivers at its store in Idaho Falls, Idaho: Connex Model 3300HP Galaxy Model DX 33HML Magnum Model S-3 Magnum Model S-6 According to Commission records these devices
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-282250A1.html
  • ) Citation No.: C200832900012 Whittier, CA ) CITATION Released: April 21, 2008 By the Acting Interim District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to Greg's Pro Audio, for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. 2. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that on April 1, 2008, Greg's Pro Audio, at their retail store in Whittier, California, marketed unauthorized radio devices, specifically, the ARK WRT 4968 Wireless Microphone, which has not been certificated for sale or use
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-282251A1.html
  • No.: C200832900013 Las Vegas, NV ) CITATION Released: April 21, 2008 By the Acting Interim District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to 4 KAMM International, Inc., for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. 2. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that on January 23, 2008, 4 KAMM International, Inc., at their wholesale distribution outlet in Las Vegas, Nevada, marketed unauthorized radio devices, specifically, the Zennox, 5 in 1 Wireless Headphones, UPC 53163-47026, which has not
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-282252A1.html
  • ) ) Citation No.: C200832900014 City of Industry, CA ) CITATION Released: April 21, 2008 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to EJ Enterprises, for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. 2. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that on January 21, 2008, EJ Enterprises, at their distribution business in City of Industry, California, marketed unauthorized radio devices, specifically, the Zennox, 5 in 1 Wireless Headphones, UPC 53163-47026, which has not been certificated
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-282253A1.html
  • ) Citation No.: C200832900015 Sante Fe Springs, CA ) CITATION Released: April 21, 2008 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to Max Sales Group, for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. 2. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that on February 20, 2008, Max Sales Group, at their distribution business in Sante Fe Springs, California, marketed unauthorized radio devices, specifically, the Zennox, 5 in 1 Wireless Headphones, UPC 53163-47026, which has not been
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-282596A1.html
  • LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE Released: May 30, 2008 By the Acting Interim District Director, Los Angeles Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Orvac Electronics, Inc. ("Orvac"), in Fullerton, California, apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by marketing non-certified 2.4 GHz wireless video transmitters and wireless cameras (intentional radiators). We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Act, that Orvac is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. On November 22, 2006, an agent from the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office inspected
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-283836A1.html
  • ) ) Citation No.: C200832900016 Hollywood, CA ) CITATION Released: July 17, 2008 By the Acting Interim District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to Wolfcom Enterprises, for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. 2. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that on June 11, 2008, Wolfcom Enterprises, at their Hollywood, California, store marketed an unauthorized radio device, specifically, the TB-1255CK 1.2 GHz wireless transmitter, which has not been certificated for sale or use in the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-284304A1.html
  • the District Director, Detroit Office, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to Phillip Symonds and Darda Troyer d.b.a. Flat River Discount Electronics and Hi-Delite Restaurant, Inc. (referred to herein jointly as "Flat River") for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803(a)(1), 2.815(b) and 2.815(c) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). 1. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Detroit Office revealed that, on July 10, 2008, Flat River offered for sale the following non-certified Citizens Band ("CB") transceivers at its store in Greenville, Michigan: Ranger Model RCI 2950; Galaxy Model DX44V; Connex Model 3300. According to the Commission's records, these devices have not received
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-287611A1.html
  • ) Citation No.: C200932780001 CITATION Released: December 23, 2008 By the Resident Agent, Anchorage Resident Agent Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to Cal-Centron Wholesale Co of Stockton, California, (Cal-Centron) for violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. 2. On November 7, 2008 an investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Anchorage Resident Agent Office revealed that Cal-Centron was marketing unauthorized devices, specifically transmitter models PK-710A, PK-811T, PK-812T, all of which operate in the 2400 MHz band, and associated receivers. None of these devices have
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-290028A1.html
  • Citation No. C200932360001 Jackson, MI ) CITATION Released: April 9, 2009 By the District Director, Detroit Office, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to Charles Leach d.b.a. Radio Connection L.L.C. ("Radio Connection") for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1), of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). 2. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Detroit Office revealed that, on March 6, 2009, Radio Connection offered for sale the following non-certified Citizens Band ("CB") transceiver at its store in Jackson, Michigan: General Lee Deluxe AM/FM amateur Transceiver. According to the Commission's records, this device has not received an FCC equipment authorization, which is required
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-290793A1.html
  • 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. In addition, radio transmitting equipment must comply with FCC rules. Section 333 of the Act prohibits willful or malicious interference with any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under the Act or operated by the United States Government. In addition, Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's rules, prohibit the manufacture, importation, marketing, sale or operation of devices deliberately designed to jam or disrupt wireless communications. The Commission has issued two Public Notices specifically stating that the sale and use of transmitters designed to prevent, jam or interfere with the operation of cellular and personal communications service ("PCS") telephones is unlawful. Section 303(n) of
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-291892A1.html
  • 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. In addition, radio transmitting equipment must comply with FCC rules. Section 333 of the Act prohibits willful or malicious interference with any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under the Act or operated by the United States Government. In addition, Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's rules, prohibit the manufacture, importation, marketing, sale or operation of devices deliberately designed to jam or disrupt wireless communications. The Commission has issued two Public Notices specifically stating that the sale and use of transmitters designed to prevent, jam or interfere with the operation of cellular and personal communications service ("PCS") telephones is unlawful. Section 303(n) of
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-293174A1.html
  • 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. In addition, radio transmitting equipment must comply with FCC rules. Section 333 of the Act prohibits willful or malicious interference with any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under the Act or operated by the United States Government. In addition, Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's rules, prohibit the manufacture, importation, marketing, sale or operation of devices deliberately designed to jam or disrupt wireless communications. The Commission has issued two Public Notices specifically stating that the sale and use of transmitters designed to prevent, jam or interfere with the operation of cellular and personal communications service ("PCS") telephones is unlawful. Section 303(n) of
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-294722A1.html
  • Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"). In addition, radio transmitting equipment must comply with the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). Section 333 of the Act prohibits willful or malicious interference with any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under the Act or operated by the United States Government. In addition, Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a) of the Rules prohibit the manufacture, importation, marketing, sale or operation of devices deliberately designed to jam or disrupt wireless communications. The Commission has issued two Public Notices specifically stating that the sale and use of transmitters designed to prevent, jam or interfere with the operation of cellular and personal communications service ("PCS") telephones is unlawful. Section 303(n) of the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-294893A1.html
  • 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. In addition, radio transmitting equipment must comply with FCC rules. Section 333 of the Act prohibits willful or malicious interference with any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under the Act or operated by the United States Government. In addition, Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's rules, prohibit the manufacture, importation, marketing, sale or operation of devices deliberately designed to jam or disrupt wireless communications. The Commission has issued two Public Notices specifically stating that the sale and use of transmitters designed to prevent, jam or interfere with the operation of cellular and personal communications service ("PCS") telephones is unlawful. Section 303(n) of
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-294894A1.html
  • 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. In addition, radio transmitting equipment must comply with FCC rules. Section 333 of the Act prohibits willful or malicious interference with any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under the Act or operated by the United States Government. In addition, Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's rules, prohibit the manufacture, importation, marketing, sale or operation of devices deliberately designed to jam or disrupt wireless communications. The Commission has issued two Public Notices specifically stating that the sale and use of transmitters designed to prevent, jam or interfere with the operation of cellular and personal communications service ("PCS") telephones is unlawful. Section 303(n) of
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-295045A1.html
  • No.: EB-09-LA-0160 Pinecomputer ) ) Citation No.: C201032900001 Covina, California ) CITATION Released: December 02, 2009 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to Pincomputer for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. 2. Investigation by the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office revealed that on November 10, 2009, Pinecomputer, located at 740 East Arrow Highway, Covina, California, marketed unauthorized radio frequency devices, specifically model W203CA, 1.2 GHz wireless surveillance cameras, and associated receivers, which have not been certificated
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-295198A1.html
  • Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act").1 In addition, radio transmitting equipment must comply with the Commission's Rules ("Rules").2 Section 333 of the Act prohibits willful or malicious interference with any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under the Act or operated by the United States Government.3 In addition, Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a) of the Rules prohibit the manufacture, importation, marketing, sale or operation of devices deliberately designed to jam or disrupt wireless communications.4 The Commission has issued two Public Notices specifically stating that the sale and use of transmitters designed to prevent, jam or interfere with the operation of cellular and personal communications service ("PCS") telephones is unlawful.5 Section 1 47 U.S.C.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-295199A1.html
  • Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"). In addition, radio transmitting equipment must comply with the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). Section 333 of the Act prohibits willful or malicious interference with any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under the Act or operated by the United States Government. In addition, Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a) of the Rules prohibit the manufacture, importation, marketing, sale or operation of devices deliberately designed to jam or disrupt wireless communications. The Commission has issued two Public Notices specifically stating that the sale and use of transmitters designed to prevent, jam or interfere with the operation of cellular and personal communications service ("PCS") telephones is unlawful. Section 303(n) of the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-296383A1.html
  • 76227 ) CITATION Released: February 5, 2010 By the District Director, Dallas Office, South Central Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to BizCom for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. 2. Investigation by the FCC's Dallas Office revealed that on July 28, 2009, BizCom sold to and installed two "cell to tower jamming units" at End Zone Athletics, Arlington, Texas. 3. Section 302(b) of the Act
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-296856A1.html
  • Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"). In addition, radio transmitting equipment must comply with the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). Section 333 of the Act prohibits willful or malicious interference with any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under the Act or operated by the United States Government. In addition, Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a) of the Rules prohibit the manufacture, importation, marketing, sale or operation of devices deliberately designed to jam or disrupt wireless communications. The Commission has issued two Public Notices specifically stating that the sale and use of transmitters designed to prevent, jam or interfere with the operation of cellular and personal communications service ("PCS") telephones is unlawful. Section 303(n) of the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-297152A1.html
  • Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"). In addition, radio transmitting equipment must comply with the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). Section 333 of the Act prohibits willful or malicious interference with any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under the Act or operated by the United States Government. In addition, Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a) of the Rules prohibit the manufacture, importation, marketing, sale or operation of devices deliberately designed to jam or disrupt wireless communications. The Commission has issued two Public Notices specifically stating that the sale and use of transmitters designed to prevent, jam or interfere with the operation of cellular and personal communications service ("PCS") telephones are unlawful. Section 303(n) of the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-297155A1.html
  • 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. In addition, radio transmitting equipment must comply with FCC rules. Section 333 of the Act prohibits willful or malicious interference with any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under the Act or operated by the United States Government. In addition, Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803 of the Commission's rules, prohibit the manufacture, importation, marketing, sale or operation of devices deliberately designed to jam or disrupt wireless communications. The Commission has issued two Public Notices specifically stating that the sale and use of transmitters designed to prevent, jam or interfere with the operation of cellular and personal communications service (PCS) telephones is unlawful. The operation of
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-297433A1.html
  • 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. In addition, radio transmitting equipment must comply with FCC rules. Section 333 of the Act prohibits willful or malicious interference with any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under the Act or operated by the United States Government. In addition, Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803 of the Commission's rules, prohibit the manufacture, importation, marketing, sale or operation of devices deliberately designed to jam or disrupt wireless communications. The Commission has issued two Public Notices specifically stating that the sale and use of transmitters designed to prevent, jam or interfere with the operation of cellular and personal communications service (PCS) telephones is unlawful. The operation of
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-298538A1.html
  • Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"). In addition, radio transmitting equipment must comply with the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). Section 333 of the Act prohibits willful or malicious interference with any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under the Act or operated by the United States Government. In addition, Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a) of the Rules prohibit the manufacture, importation, marketing, sale or operation of devices deliberately designed to jam or disrupt wireless communications. The Commission has issued two Public Notices specifically stating that the sale and use of transmitters designed to prevent, jam or interfere with the operation of cellular and personal communications service ("PCS") telephones is unlawful. Section 303(n) of the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-302947A1.html
  • 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. In addition, radio transmitting equipment must comply with FCC rules. Section 333 of the Act prohibits willful or malicious interference with any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under the Act or operated by the United States Government. In addition, Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803 of the Commission's rules, prohibit the manufacture, importation, marketing, sale or operation of devices deliberately designed to jam or disrupt wireless communications. The Commission has issued two Public Notices specifically stating that the sale and use of transmitters designed to prevent, jam or interfere with the operation of cellular and personal communications service (PCS) telephones is unlawful. The operation of
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-304360A1.html
  • 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. In addition, radio transmitting equipment must comply with FCC rules. Section 333 of the Act prohibits willful or malicious interference with any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under the Act or operated by the United States Government. In addition, Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803 of the Commission's rules, prohibit the manufacture, importation, marketing, sale or operation of devices deliberately designed to jam or disrupt wireless communications. The Commission has issued two Public Notices specifically stating that the sale and use of transmitters designed to prevent, jam or interfere with the operation of cellular and personal communications service (PCS) telephones is unlawful. The operation of
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-305288A1.html
  • Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"). In addition, radio transmitting equipment must comply with the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). Section 333 of the Act prohibits willful or malicious interference with any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under the Act or operated by the United States Government. In addition, section 302(b) of the Act, and section 2.803(a) of the Rules prohibit the manufacture, importation, marketing, sale or operation of devices deliberately designed to jam or disrupt wireless communications. The Commission has issued two Public Notices specifically stating that the sale and use of transmitters designed to prevent, jam or interfere with the operation of cellular and personal communications service ("PCS") telephones is unlawful. Section 303(n) of the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-305291A1.html
  • 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. In addition, radio transmitting equipment must comply with FCC rules. Section 333 of the Act prohibits willful or malicious interference with any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under the Act or operated by the United States Government. In addition, Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803 of the Commission's rules, prohibit the manufacture, importation, marketing, sale or operation of devices deliberately designed to jam or disrupt wireless communications. The Commission has issued two Public Notices specifically stating that the sale and use of transmitters designed to prevent, jam or interfere with the operation of cellular and PCS telephones is unlawful. The operation of the device utilized
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-305292A1.html
  • 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. In addition, radio transmitting equipment must comply with FCC rules. Section 333 of the Act prohibits willful or malicious interference with any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under the Act or operated by the United States Government. In addition, Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803 of the Commission's rules, prohibit the manufacture, importation, marketing, sale or operation of devices deliberately designed to jam or disrupt wireless communications. The Commission has issued two Public Notices specifically stating that the sale and use of transmitters designed to prevent, jam or interfere with the operation of cellular and PCS telephones is unlawful. The operation of the device utilized
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-305680A1.html
  • 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. In addition, radio transmitting equipment must comply with FCC rules. Section 333 of the Act prohibits willful or malicious interference with any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under the Act or operated by the United States Government. In addition, Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803 of the Commission's rules, prohibit the manufacture, importation, marketing, sale or operation of devices deliberately designed to jam or disrupt wireless communications. The Commission has issued two Public Notices specifically stating that the sale and use of transmitters designed to prevent, jam or interfere with the operation of cellular and PCS telephones is unlawful. The operation of the device utilized
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-306457A1.html
  • 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. In addition, radio transmitting equipment must comply with FCC rules. Section 333 of the Act prohibits willful or malicious interference with any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under the Act or operated by the United States Government. In addition, Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803 of the Commission's rules, prohibit the manufacture, importation, marketing, sale or operation of devices deliberately designed to jam or disrupt wireless communications. The Commission has issued two Public Notices specifically stating that the sale and use of transmitters designed to prevent, jam or interfere with the operation of cellular and PCS telephones is unlawful. The operation of the device utilized
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-306905A1.html
  • 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. In addition, radio transmitting equipment must comply with FCC rules. Section 333 of the Act prohibits willful or malicious interference with any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under the Act or operated by the United States Government. In addition, Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803 of the Commission's rules, prohibit the manufacture, importation, marketing, sale or operation of devices deliberately designed to jam or disrupt wireless communications. The Commission has issued two Public Notices specifically stating that the sale and use of transmitters designed to prevent, jam or interfere with the operation of cellular and PCS telephones is unlawful. The operation of the device utilized
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-307313A1.html
  • 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. In addition, radio transmitting equipment must comply with FCC rules. Section 333 of the Act prohibits willful or malicious interference with any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under the Act or operated by the United States Government. In addition, section 302(b) of the Act, and section 2.803 of the Commission's rules, prohibit the manufacture, importation, marketing, sale or operation of devices deliberately designed to jam or disrupt wireless communications. The Commission has issued two Public Notices and an Enforcement Advisory specifically stating that the sale and use of transmitters designed to prevent, jam or interfere with the operation of cellular telephones, personal communications service (PCS) telephones, and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-307485A1.html
  • 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. In addition, radio transmitting equipment must comply with FCC rules. Section 333 of the Act prohibits willful or malicious interference with any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under the Act or operated by the United States Government. In addition, section 302(b) of the Act, and section 2.803 of the Commission's rules, prohibit the manufacture, importation, marketing, sale or operation of devices deliberately designed to jam or disrupt wireless communications. The Commission has issued two Public Notices and an Enforcement Advisory specifically stating that the sale and use of transmitters designed to prevent, jam or interfere with the operation of cellular telephones, personal communications service (PCS) telephones, and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-308002A1.html
  • 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. In addition, radio transmitting equipment must comply with FCC rules. Section 333 of the Act prohibits willful or malicious interference with any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under the Act or operated by the United States Government. In addition, Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803 of the Commission's rules, prohibits the manufacture, importation, marketing, sale or operation of devices deliberately designed to jam or disrupt wireless communications. The Commission has issued two Public Notices specifically stating that the sale and use of transmitters designed to prevent, jam or interfere with the operation of cellular and personal communications service (PCS) telephones is unlawful. Please see the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-311456A1.html
  • 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. In addition, radio transmitting equipment must comply with FCC rules. Section 333 of the Act prohibits willful or malicious interference with any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under the Act or operated by the United States Government. In addition, Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803 of the Commission's rules, prohibits the manufacture, importation, marketing, sale or operation of devices deliberately designed to jam or disrupt wireless communications. The Commission has issued two Public Notices specifically stating that the sale and use of transmitters designed to prevent, jam or interfere with the operation of cellular and personal communications service (PCS) telephones is unlawful. You are hereby
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-312659A1.html
  • 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. In addition, radio transmitting equipment must comply with FCC rules. Section 333 of the Act prohibits willful or malicious interference with any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under the Act or operated by the United States Government. In addition, Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803 of the Commission's rules, prohibit the manufacture, importation, marketing, sale or operation of devices deliberately designed to jam or disrupt wireless communications. The Commission has issued two Public Notices specifically stating that the sale and use of transmitters designed to prevent, jam or interfere with the operation of cellular and personal communications service (PCS) telephones is unlawful. Operation of a
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/News_Releases/DOC-255184A1.html
  • (D.C. Circ 1974) __________________________________________________________________ FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE December 13, 2004 NEWS MEDIA CONTACT: Janice Wise at (202) 418-7450 [5]Janice.Wise@FCC.GOV FCC AND SAMSON TECHNOLOGIES ENTER INTO $26,500 CONSENT DECREE CONCERNING EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS Washington, D.C. - The Federal Communications Commission today entered into a Consent Decree with Samson Technologies, Inc. (Samson) that resolves possible violations of 47 U.S.C. 302a(b) and 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a) concerning Samson's importation and marketing of certain models of multi-track music recording devices. As part of the Consent Decree, Samson will make a $26,500 voluntary payment to the U.S. Treasury and will implement a Compliance Plan aimed at preventing future violations of the Commission's equipment regulations. Action by the Commission on December 8, 2004, by Order [6](FCC 04-282) Chairman Powell,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/News_Releases/DOC-310226A1.html
  • Enforcement Bureau has issued 20 enforcement actions against online retailers in 12 states for illegally marketing more than 200 uniquely-described models of cell phone jammers, GPS jammers, Wi-Fi jammers, and similar signal jamming devices. These devices have the capacity to prevent, block, or otherwise interfere with authorized radio communications in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act and sections 2.803 and 15.201(b) of the Commission's rules. The Enforcement Bureau's actions are intended to warn retailers and potential purchasers that marketing, selling, or using signal jamming devices in the U.S. is illegal and that the FCC will vigorously prosecute these violations. Enforcement Bureau Chief Michele Ellison said, "Our actions should send a strong message to retailers of signal jamming devices that
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/News_Releases/brewer.html
  • BUREAU FINES FLORIDA MAN $10,000 FOR MARKETING UNAUTHORIZED RADIO EQUIPMENT WASHINGTON, D.C. - Today, the Enforcement Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission issued a Forfeiture Order imposing a $10,000 forfeiture against Leslie D. Brewer and his company, Leslie D. Brewer's 2-Way Radio. The fine was imposed for the sale of an unauthorized FM radio transmitter in willful violation of Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 15.201(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a)(1), and 15.201(b). Mr. Brewer sold a fully assembled, 20-watt transmitter capable of operating in the FM frequency band to an undercover Commission agent. The transmitter was not authorized by the Commission, and had no FCC identifier number affixed to it. Mr. Brewer was previously involved in the operation of an unauthorized
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011489.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011489.html
  • (b) To determine whether Leslie D. Brewer willfully and/or repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, by operating an unlicensed Studio-to-Transmitter Link in 1999 and/or 2000, and, if so, the effect thereof on his basic qualifications to be and remain a Commission licensee. (c) To determine whether Leslie D. Brewer willfully and/or repeatedly violated Sections 2.803(a)(1) and/or 15.201(b) of the Commission's rules by marketing and/or selling an unauthorized radio frequency device or devices, and, if so, the effect thereof on his basic qualifications to be and remain a Commission licensee. (d) To determine whether, in light of the evidence adduced pursuant to the foregoing issues, Leslie D. Brewer is qualified to be and remain a Commission
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01074.html
  • 2000, confirmed continuing operation of both the unlicensed FM station on 102.1 MHz from the Shady Oaks Plaza warehouse and the unlicensed STL on 950.0925 MHz from Mr. Brewer's Liberty Avenue residence. 10. In addition to operating pirate FM and STL facilities, Mr. Brewer also has engaged in marketing unauthorized FM broadcast transmitting equipment, in apparent willful violation of Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 15.201(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a)(1) and 15.201(b).9 Thus, in early 1997, it came to the Commission's attention that Mr. Brewer, through his business, L.D. Brewer 2-Way Radio, was marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices. As a result, on July 18, 1997, the Commission staff directed a warning letter to Mr. Brewer to refrain from such activities. Mr.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-1127A1.html
  • 2002 Released: May 14, 2002 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Memorandum Opinion and Order (``Order''), we cancel a seven thousand dollar ($7,000) Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'')1 that the Miami Resident Agent Office issued to Lightning Electronics, Inc. (``Lightning''), for apparently violating Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'')2 and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').3 The alleged violations involve Lightning's marketing of non-compliant high-power cordless telephones. 2. The Commission's Miami, Florida, Resident Agent Office issued the NAL to Lightning on October 29, 2001. Lightning did not file a response to the NAL. On February 21, 2002, the Chief, Enforcement Bureau, issued a Forfeiture Order 4 affirming the forfeiture proposed by
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-1141A1.html
  • 15, 2002 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seventeen thousand dollars ($17,000) to CTI of Miami, Inc. (``CTI''), for willful violation of Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 and repeated and willful violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').2 The noted violations involve CTI's marketing of non-compliant high-power cordless telephones and CTI's operation of a non-compliant high-power cordless telephone without authorization from the Commission. 2. On January 25, 2002, the Commission's Miami, Florida, Resident Agent Office issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture in the amount of $17,000 to CTI for the noted
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-2474A1.html
  • FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: September 30, 2002 Released: October 2, 2002 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. Introduction 1. In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) against Lightning Electronics, Inc. (``Lightning''), for willful and repeated violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'')1 and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').2 The noted violations involve Lightning's marketing of unapproved long-range cordless telephones. 2. On May 21, 2002, the District Director of the Enforcement Bureau's (``Bureau'') Tampa, Florida, Office (``Tampa Office'') released a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') against Lightning in the amount of $7,000.3 Lightning filed a response to the NAL dated June 11,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-373A1.html
  • Florida ) FRN 0006-1134-84 FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: February 15, 2002 Released: February 20, 2002 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Electronics Unlimited for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').2 The noted violations involve Electronic Unlimited's marketing of a non-compliant high-power cordless telephone (``Alcon, AT526''). 2. On October 23, 2001, the Commission's Miami, Florida Resident Agent Office (``Miami Office'') issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Electronics Unlimited for the noted violations.3 Electronics Unlimited has
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-383A1.html
  • FRN 0006-2915-95 FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: February 19, 2002 Released: February 21, 2002 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Lightning Electronics, Inc. (``Lightning''), for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'')1 and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').2 The noted violations involve Lightning's marketing of non-compliant high- power cordless telephones. 2. On October 29, 2001, the Commission's Miami, Florida, Resident Agent Office issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture in the amount of $7,000 to Lightning for the noted violations.3 Lightning has not filed a response. Based on the information before us,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-453A1.html
  • 0006-3343-12 ) FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: February 26, 2002 Released: March 1, 2002 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000), to New Image Electronics (``NIE''), for willful violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules").2 The noted violation involves NIE's marketing of non-compliant long-range cordless telephones. 2. On October 29, 2001, the District Director of the Commission's Tampa, Florida Field Office issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"),3 on behalf of the Commission's Miami, Florida Resident Agent Office ("Miami Office"), in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000).
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-3107A1.html
  • 2003 Released: October 10, 2003 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Memorandum Opinion and Order (``Order''), we deny the request filed by Lightning Electronics, Inc. (``Lightning''), for reconsideration of the Forfeiture Order issued to Lightning on October 2, 2002, for willful and repeated violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'')1 and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').2 The noted violations involve Lightning's marketing of unapproved long-range cordless telephones. 2. On May 21, 2002, the District Director of the Enforcement Bureau's (``Bureau'') Tampa, Florida, Office (``Tampa Office'') released a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') against Lightning in the amount of $7,000.3 Lightning filed its response to the NAL dated June 11,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-3544A1.html
  • of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order (``NAL''), we find Johannus Orgelbouw b.v. (``Johannus'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for importing and marketing radio frequency devices which do not comply with the Commission's technical standards in repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').2 The noted violations involve Johannus's importing and marketing digital electronic organs that do not comply with the technical requirements set forth in Part 15 of the Rules. In addition, we order Johannus, pursuant to Section 2.956(a)(1) of the Rules,3 to submit to the Enforcement Bureau a copy of the verification records for each model of
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-03-4118A1.html
  • January 2, 2004 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Datel Design and Development, Inc. (``Datel'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of ten thousand dollars ($10,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').2 The noted violations involve Datel's importing and marketing of approximately 15,000 thousand units of the Datel Talknet USB Headset, Model Number DUS0049, that do not comply with the radiated emission limits set forth in Part 15 of the Rules. II. BACKGROUND 2. The Talknet USB Headsets involved in this case were manufactured outside the United
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-1013A1.html
  • and distributed in the United States by Vector Products, Inc. d/b/a Vector Manufacturing, Ltd. (``Vector'') were not in compliance with the technical standards of Part 15 of the Commission's Rules.1 The Public Notice advised retailers that continued marketing of the battery chargers would constitute a violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (``Act'')2 and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').3 On October 23, 2003, Vector filed a petition for reconsideration of that Public Notice.4 2. On April 2, 2004, Vector filed a motion to withdraw the petition for reconsideration.5 Vector notes that it has entered into a Consent Decree with the Enforcement Bureau and the Office of Engineering and Technology which terminates the Enforcement Bureau's
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-1092A1.html
  • FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: April 23, 2004 Released: April 27, 2004 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of five thousand, six hundred dollars ($5,600) to Johannus Orgelbouw b.v. (``Johannus''), for repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').2 The noted violations involve Johannus's importing and marketing digital electronic organs that do not comply with the technical requirements set forth in Part 15 of the Rules. 2. On November 6, 2003, the Enforcement Bureau issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') 3 in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Johannus.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-1377A1.html
  • By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau and Schumacher Electric Corporation (``Schumacher''). The Consent Decree terminates the forfeiture proceeding initiated by the Enforcement Bureau against Schumacher for its apparent failure to comply with the equipment requirements set forth in Section 302(b) of the Act1 and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').2 2. The Enforcement Bureau and Schumacher have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve this matter and terminate the forfeiture proceeding. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. Based on the record before us, we conclude that no substantial or material questions of fact exist
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-1704A1.html
  • by attorney at the prehearing conference held on April 7, 2004. 8 See 47 C.F.R. 95.1. 9 47 C.F.R. 95.631(a). That provision limits non-voice emissions from GMRS transmitters to selective calling or tone- operated squelch tones to establish or continue voice communications. See also 47 C.F.R. 95.181(f), (g). 10 47 C.F.R. 95.631(f). 11 47 C.F.R. 95.603(a). See also 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a)(1). 12 OET originally granted J Communications' Application for Equipment Authorization (FCC Form 731) for its GMRS radios on May 2, 2001. OET reissued the certification on March 20, 2002, after testing the device in accordance with its post-grant sampling program. 13 Emissions are designated by an alphanumeric code according to their classification and necessary bandwidth. The first symbol designates the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-2530A1.html
  • I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find IKUSI-Angel Iglesias, S.A. (``IKUSI'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for importing and marketing in the United States non-compliant equipment in willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b)1 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803(a)(1)2 and 15.231(a)3 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). II. BACKGROUND 2. The Office of Engineering and Technology referred to the Enforcement Bureau a complaint alleging that IKUSI's Remote Crane Transmitter (``RCT Model TM60''),4 a radio frequency device designed for the remote control of cranes and hoists, fails to comply with Section 15.231(a) of the Rules, which requires a manually operated transmitter
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-3189A1.html
  • VIA Technologies, Inc. (``VIA'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000) for importing and marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices, specifically, its model EPIA-M and EPIA-CL computer central processing unit (``CPU'') boards, in willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').2 II. BACKGROUND 2. The FCC's Office of Engineering and Technology referred to the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Enforcement Bureau a complaint alleging that VIA was importing and marketing in the U.S. CPU boards which include a setup option to disable the board's spread spectrum clocking (``SSC'') function. The complainant alleged that VIA was importing
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-3947A1.html
  • issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000) against VIA Technologies, Inc. (``VIA'') for importing and marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices, specifically, its model EPIA-M and EPIA-CL computer central processing unit (``CPU'') boards, in willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').2 2. On October 6, 2004, the Spectrum Enforcement Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of $14,000 to VIA.3 VIA has not filed a response to the NAL. Based on the information before us, we affirm this forfeiture. 3. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT, pursuant to Section 503(b) of
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-976A1.html
  • 2004 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Schumacher Electric Corporation (``Schumacher'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for marketing unauthorized equipment in willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').2 II. BACKGROUND 2. On November 5, 2003, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') received a complaint alleging that Schumacher was marketing a new line of SpeedCharge automobile battery chargers (``SpeedChargers'') at the ongoing Automobile Aftermarket Products Expo (``AAPEX'') in Las Vegas, Nevada.3 According to the complaint, Schumacher did not label the exhibited SpeedChargers under Section 15.19(a)(3) of
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/FCC-04-24A1.html
  • Secretary _________________________ 1 47 C.F.R. 2.939. 2 47 C.F.R. 95.631. 3 See 47 C.F.R. 95.1. 4 47 C.F.R. 95.631(a). Under Section 95.631(a), non-voice emissions from GMRS transmitters are limited to selective calling or tone-operated squelch tones to establish or continue voice communications. See also 47 C.F.R. 95.181(f), (g). 5 47 C.F.R. 95.631(f). 6 47 C.F.R. 95.603(a). See also 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a)(1). 7 OET originally granted J Communications' Application for Equipment Authorization (FCC Form 731) for its GMRS radios on May 2, 2001. OET reissued the certification on March 20, 2002, after testing the device in accordance with its post-grant sampling program. 8 Emissions are designated by an alphanumeric code according to their classification and necessary bandwidth. The first symbol designates the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/FCC-04-259A1.html
  • 1, 2004 By the Commission: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find ACR Electronics, Inc. (``ACR'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seventy five thousand dollars ($75,000) for marketing unauthorized equipment in willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934 as amended (``Act''),1 and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').2 II. BACKGROUND 2. In February 2004, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') received a complaint alleging that ACR was marketing through outdoor and sporting publications and websites a new personal location beacon (``PLB''), 406 GPS PLB-200 (``PLB-200''), under the names ``TerraFix'' for land use, ``AquaFix'' for marine use, and ``AeroFix'' for aviation use, which had not been
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/FCC-04-272A1.html
  • Released: November 22, 2004 By the Commission: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Pilot Travel Centers, L.L.C. (``Pilot'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of one hundred twenty-five thousand dollars ($125,000) for willful and repeated violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').2 Specifically, we find Pilot apparently liable for offering for sale radio frequency devices without the required Commission equipment authorization. II. BACKGROUND 2. Section 302 of the Act authorizes the Commission to make reasonable regulations, consistent with the public interest, governing the interference potential of equipment that emits radio frequency energy,3 and prohibits, inter alia, the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/FCC-04-282A1.html
  • the Commission: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Commission and Samson Technologies, Inc. (``Samson''). The Consent Decree terminates the forfeiture proceeding initiated by the Commission against Samson for its apparent failure to comply with the requirements set forth in Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').1 2. The Commission and Samson have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve this matter and terminate the forfeiture proceeding. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. Based on the record before us, we conclude that no substantial or material questions of fact exist with
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/FCC-04-39A1.html
  • 2004 Released: March 3, 2004 By the Commission: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Samson Technologies, Inc. (``Samson'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of thirty- five thousand dollars ($35,000) for willful and repeated apparent violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').2 The noted apparent violations involve Samson's importing and marketing of five models of multi-track music recording devices that do not comply with the radiated emission limits set forth in Part 15 of the Rules. II. BACKGROUND 2. Zoom Corporation (``Zoom''), a Japanese company, manufactured the recording equipment involved in this case and Samson imported that
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1029A1.html
  • Blvd. Bentonville, Arkansas 72716-0710 Re: File No. EB- 05-SE-050 Dear Ms. Nounou: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(5), for marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter dated February 24, 2005, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau initiated an investigation into whether Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (``Wal-Mart'') is marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1030A1.html
  • Road Winchester, Virginia 22602 Re: File No. EB- 05-SE-063 Dear Mr. Ryberg: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(5), for marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. It has come to our attention that GPS Outfitters, Inc. (``GPS Outfitters'') has been marketing the Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna in the United States. Specifically, on March 4, 2005, staff of the FCC
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1031A1.html
  • West Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15275 Re: File No. EB- 05-SE-062 Dear Mr. Colombo: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(5), for marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. It has come to our attention that Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc. (``Dick's'') has been marketing the GPS Outfitters Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna in the United States. Specifically, on March 4, 2005, staff of
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1033A1.html
  • of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406 Re: File No. EB- 05-SE-064 Dear Mr. Rubin: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(5), for marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. It has come to our attention that Fogdog, Inc. (``Fogdog'') has been marketing the GPS Outfitters Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna in the United States. Specifically, on February 14, 2005 and March 18, 2005,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1034A1.html
  • Way Canton, Massachusetts 02021 Re: File No. EB- 05-SE-065 Dear Mr. Stone: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(5), for marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. It has come to our attention that Tweeter Home Entertainment Group (``Tweeter'') has been marketing the GPS Outfitters Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna in the United States. Specifically, on March 7, 2005 and March
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1035A1.html
  • Avenue Englewood, Colorado 80110 Re: File No. EB- 05-SE-078 Dear Mr. Hendrickson: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(5), for marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. It has come to our attention that The Sports Authority, Inc. (``Sports Authority'') has been marketing the GPS Outfitters Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna in the United States. Specifically, on March 15, 2005, staff
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1036A1.html
  • La Canada, California 91011 Re: File No. EB- 05-SE-080 Dear Mr. Levra: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(5), for marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. It has come to our attention that Sport Chalet, Inc. (``Sport Chalet'') has been marketing the GPS Outfitters Vortech Re-Radiator GPS Antenna in the United States. Specifically, on March 15, 2005, staff of
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1037A1.html
  • Ocean Isle Beach, NC 28469 Re: File No. EB- 05-SE-079 Dear Sir/Madam: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(5), for marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. It has come to our attention that The GPS Store, Inc. (``GPS Store'') has been marketing the GPS Outfitters Vortech Re- Radiator GPS Antenna in the United States. Specifically, on March 15, 2005,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1107A1.html
  • Ave. Dallas, Texas 75228 Re: File No. EB- 05-SE-007 Dear Mr. Baker: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(5), for marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the Rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter dated March 11, 2005, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau initiated an investigation into whether Dallas Avionics, Inc., (``Dallas'') is domestically marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices, specifically, the Global
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1155A1.html
  • CA 94545 Re: File No. EB- 05-SE-005 Dear Mr. Ho: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(5), for importing and marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter dated March 7, 2005,1 the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau initiated an investigation into whether Gilsson Technologies (``Gilsson'') is marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1388A1.html
  • 564 East Hampstead, NH 03826 Re: File No. EB- 05-SE-066 Dear Mr. Clark: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(5), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter dated March 15, 2005, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau initiated an investigation into whether Sandown Wireless (``Sandown'') is marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1622A1.html
  • Apartment 108 Seattle, WA 98105 Re: File No. EB- 05-SE-059 Dear Shaker Hassan: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(5), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter dated March 15, 2005, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau initiated an investigation into whether Grand Trades Co. (``Grand Trades'') is marketing in the United States unauthorized radio
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1666A1.html
  • Oaks, CA 91411 Re: File No. EB- 05-SE-170 Dear Sir or Madam: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(5), for marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The equipment authorization for the LRT-1 learned mode remote control transmitter device (``learned mode transmitter'') manufactured by Tung Shih Technology Co., Ltd. was revoked on April 18, 2005 (copy of revocation order enclosed).1
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-1701A1.html
  • 22, 2005 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Hawking Technologies, Inc. (``Hawking''), apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-two thousand dollars ($22,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.204(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').2 The alleged violations involve marketing external radiofrequency power amplifiers in a manner that was inconsistent with the terms of its equipment authorization and the requirements of Section 15.204(a) of the Rules. II. BACKGROUND 2. On December 9 and 14, 2004, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') received complaints alleging that Hawking was illegally marketing the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-2036A1.html
  • OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: July 18, 2005 Released: July 20, 2005 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Memorandum Opinion and Order, we admonish TeleRadio AB (``TeleRadio'') for importing and marketing in the United States non-compliant radiofrequency devices in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.231(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').2 II. BACKGROUND 2. In 2004, the FCC's Office of Engineering and Technology (``OET'') Laboratory requested four TeleRadio remote control transmitters, designed for the remote control of cranes and hoists in industrial use, for compliance testing as part of its post-grant sampling program. On June 21, 2004, the OET Lab tested the transmitters and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-2069A1.html
  • 25, 2005 Released: July 27, 2005 By the Regional Director, South Central Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Hightech CB Shop (``Hightech'') for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').2 The noted violation involves Hightech's offering for sale a non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceiver.3 II. BACKGROUND 2. On May 9, 2001, the Commission's Tampa Office of the Enforcement Bureau (``Tampa Office'') issued a Citation to Hightech for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections 2.803(a)(1)4 and 2.815(b)5 of the Rules by offering for
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-2236A1.html
  • Los Angeles, CA 90036 Re: File No. EB- 05-SE-229 Dear Mr. Premore: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(5), for marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The equipment authorization for the Remocon LRT-1 learned mode remote control transmitter device (``learned mode transmitter''), also known as the Remocon RMC-600, manufactured by Tung Shih Technology Co., Ltd. was revoked on April
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-2237A1.html
  • 223 Reseda, CA 91335 Re: File No. EB- 05-SE-227 Dear Mr. Bitton: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(5), for marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The equipment authorization for the LRT-1 learned mode remote control transmitter device (``learned mode transmitter'') manufactured by Tung Shih Technology Co., Ltd. was revoked on April 18, 2005 (copy of revocation order enclosed).1
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-2238A1.html
  • 226 Reseda, CA 91335 Re: File No. EB- 05-SE-228 Dear Mr. Bitton: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(5), for marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The equipment authorization for the LRT-1 learned mode remote control transmitter device (``learned mode transmitter'') manufactured by Tung Shih Technology Co., Ltd. was revoked on April 18, 2005 (copy of revocation order enclosed).1
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-2318A1.html
  • 53 Parker Irvine, CA 92618 Re: File No. EB- 04-SE-253 Dear Mr. Wei: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(5), for marketing unlabeled radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a)(1). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter dated December 7, 2004, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau initiated an investigation into whether Blitzz Technology, Inc. (``Blitzz'') is marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-2352A1.html
  • NY 11237 Re: File No. EB- 05-SE-350 Dear Mr. Yao: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(5), for importing and marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter dated December 2, 2004,1 the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau initiated an investigation into whether Joe's Photo Auction is marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-2382A1.html
  • 1, 2005 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Gibson Tech Ed, Inc. (``Gibson'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000) for apparent willful and repeated violation of Sections 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').2 The noted apparent violations involve Gibson's marketing of two models of unauthorized FM broadcast transmitters. II. BACKGROUND 2. On June 30, 2004, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') issued Gibson a Citation3 for marketing unauthorized FM broadcast transmission equipment manufactured by Veronica Ltd. (``Veronica''), in violation Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803 of the Rules,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-2394A1.html
  • RI 02818 Re: File No. EB- 05-SE-173 Dear Mr. Jensen: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(5), for: (1) marketing an unauthorized radio frequency (``RF'') device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a); and (2) importing RF devices without declaring an import condition in violation of Section 2.1203 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. 2.1203. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject you to monetary forfeitures. Your response of July 14, 2005, to our letter of inquiry (``LOI'') indicates
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-2429A1.html
  • NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE Adopted: September 8, 2005 Released: September 12, 2005 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Inteligain Corporation, Inc. (``Inteligain'') has apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'')2 by marketing the Inteligain model DBA-819 dual band cellular and Personal Communications Service (``PCS'') amplifier, FCC ID # RCUDBA819-807, in a manner inconsistent with a condition in its equipment certification intended to ensure compliance with RF exposure limits. We conclude that Inteligain is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-2994A1.html
  • Nuys, CA 91406 Re: File No. EB- 05-SE-323 Dear Sir or Madam: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(5), for marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 302a(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The equipment authorization for the LRT-1 learned mode remote control transmitter device (``learned mode transmitter'') was revoked on April 18, 2005 (copy of revocation order enclosed).1 Following the issuance of the revocation order,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-2998A1.html
  • Rd Alexandria, VA 22312-2707 Re: File No. EB-04-SE- 362 Dear Sir or Madame: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(5), for marketing a radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 302(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), 47 C.F.R. 2.803 and 15.205(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter dated January 11, 2005,1 (Letter of Inquiry) the Spectrum Enforcement Division (SED) of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau informed Navtech Seminars and GPS Supply (Navtech) that it had
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-3062A1.html
  • Spectrum Enforcement Division (``Division'') of the Enforcement Bureau sent Sandown Wireless, a distributor of AS&S's products, an LOI seeking information and documents concerning its marketing of cell phone jammers and multi-purpose jammers to state and local law enforcement agencies in the United States in apparent violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').1 On behalf of Sandown, AS&S submitted a response to this LOI on March 25, 2005.2 AS&S included with its response a confidentiality request, in which AS&S asked that ``all documents found within a directory (CD-ROM) and an appendix (printed) named CONFIDENTIAL or marked CONFIDENTIAL be held in confidence and not be made available for public
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-3063A1.html
  • 3, 2004, at least a year after the Freetalker was first marketed in the United States.3 The Bureau subsequently began an investigation to determine whether Shenzhen Ruidian Communication had marketed the Freetalker two-way radio in the United States prior to obtaining an equipment certification in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Rules, and whether Shenzhen Ruidian Communication marketed the Freetalker labeled with Global Link's FCC Identifier. On March 10, 2005, the Bureau sent a letter of inquiry to Shenzhen Ruidian Communication via international certified mail, return receipt requested, facsimile and email.4 The letter directed Shenzhen Ruidian Communication to submit a response to the letter within 20 days. Shenzhen Ruidian
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-3125A1.html
  • this Memorandum Opinion and Order (``Order''), we deny the petition for reconsideration filed by Hightech CB Shop (``Hightech'') of the Forfeiture Order issued July 27, 2005.1 The Forfeiture Order imposed a monetary forfeiture in the amount of $7,000 to Hightech for the willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),2 and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').3 The noted violation involved Hightech's offering for sale a non-certified Citizens Band (``CB'') transceiver.4 II. BACKGROUND 2. On May 9, 2001, the Commission's Tampa Office of the Enforcement Bureau (``Tampa Office'') issued a Citation to Hightech for violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections 2.803(a)(1)5 and 2.815(b)6 of the Rules by offering for
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-345A1.html
  • (``NAL''), we find Bureau D'Electronique Appliquee, Inc. (``B.E.A.'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000) for importing and marketing in the United States unauthorized intentional radiating devices,1 specifically, the Wizard and Falcon microwave motion sensors, in willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),2 and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). 3 II. BACKGROUND 2. On August 3, 2004, the Enforcement Bureau received an informal complaint alleging that B.E.A. is importing and marketing a substantial number of unauthorized motion sensors in the United States, specifically, the Wizard, Falcon and MS-07. In support of the allegation, the complainant explained that none of the subject motion sensors are
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-42A1.html
  • this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau and St. Louis Music, Inc. (``SLM''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Enforcement Bureau into whether SLM's manufacture, importation, marketing and sale of certain Class B digital audio devices violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (``Act'')1 and Sections 2.803(a), 15.19 and 15.105(b) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').2 2. The Enforcement Bureau and SLM have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve this matter and terminate the investigation. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. Based on the record before us, we conclude that no substantial or material questions of
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-1084A1.html
  • 1001 W. Fayette Street Syracuse, New York 13204-2859 Re: File No. EB-06-SE-071 Dear Mr. Hill: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). As explained below, future violations of the equipment provisions of the Act and Rules may subject Oneida Air Systems, Inc. ("Oneida") to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry ("LOI") dated March 6, 2006, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau initiated an investigation into whether Oneida marketed dust collection equipment with unauthorized remote
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-1334A1.html
  • 2006 Released: June 29, 2006 By the Regional Director, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Forfeiture Order ("Order"), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to TravelCenters of America ("TravelCenters") in Troutdale, Oregon, for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 302(b) of the Commissions Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). On July 27, 2005, the Enforcement Bureau's Portland Resident Agent Office issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL") after determining that TravelCenters offered for sale a non-certified Citizens Band ("CB") transceiver. In this Order, we consider TravelCenters' argument that the type of transceivers it offered for sale are not covered by the Commission's
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-136A1.html
  • 25, 2006 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Ramsey Electronics, Inc. (``Ramsey''), apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 and Sections 2.803(a) and (g) and 2.815(b) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').2 The noted apparent violations involve Ramsey's marketing of two models of unauthorized FM broadcast transmitters and two models of external radio frequency (``RF'') power amplifiers (``amplifiers''). II. BACKGROUND 2. The Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') obtained information indicating that Ramsey was apparently marketing unauthorized FM broadcast transmitters and RF amplifiers in the United
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-1413A1.html
  • the Bureau. (f) "Adopting Order" means an order of the Bureau adopting the terms and conditions of this Consent Decree. (g) "Effective Date" means the date on which the Bureau releases the Adopting Order. (h) "Investigation" means the investigation commenced by the Bureau's November 17, 2004 Letter of Inquiry regarding whether AMAC violated Section 302(b) of the Act and/or Sections 2.803 and 2.925 of the Rules. (i) "Rules" means the Commission's Rules found in Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations. (j) "Act" means the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. SS151 et seq. Terms of Agreement 6. The Parties agree that the provisions of this Consent Decree shall be subject to final approval by the Bureau by
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-1436A1.html
  • John Reed Court City of Industry, CA 91745 Re: File No. EB-05-SE-018 Dear Mr. Ho: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices, specifically, external radio frequency power amplifiers, in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections 2.803 and 15.204(d) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On August 2, 2005, staff from the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("SED") of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau visited the internet web site store for OvisLink products, http://store.ovislink.com ("OvisLink online store"). The OvisLink online store listed
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-1442A1.html
  • 17, 2006 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find AboCom Systems, Inc. ("AboCom") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The apparent violations involve marketing wireless access points that do not comply with the terms of its equipment authorization and the requirements of Section 15.247(d) of the Rules. II. background 2. The equipment involved in this proceeding is the Hawking Technology, Inc. ("Hawking") Model HWRG54 wireless access point ("HWRG54") and the identical Phoebe Micro, Inc.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-1607A1.html
  • EB-06-SE-259 Dear Mr. Mazursky: This is an official CITATION, issued to Digital Innovations, L.L.C. ("Digital Innovations") pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing two non-compliant radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302(b), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S 2.803(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. Following receipt of a complaint alleging that Digital Innovations is marketing in the United States two radio frequency devices, specifically, the Security Dr. PC Defender Screen Lock and the Security Dr. Wireless
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-1697A1.html
  • By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Memorandum Opinion and Order, we deny a petition for reconsideration filed by Gibson Tech Ed Inc., d/b/a/ Hobbytron.com ("Gibson"), of a Forfeiture Order imposing a forfeiture of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The violations involved Gibson's marketing of two models (R-FM25B-WT) and (R-FM100B-WT) of unauthorized FM broadcast transmitters. II. BACKGROUND 2. On June 30, 2004, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") issued Gibson a Citation for marketing unauthorized FM broadcast transmission equipment manufactured by Veronica Ltd. ("Veronica"), in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a) of
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-1933A1.html
  • September 27, 2006 Released: September 29, 2006 By the Regional Director, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Forfeiture Order ("Order"), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Clegg Industries, Inc. ("Clegg") in Torrance, California, for repeatedly violating Section 302(b) of the Commissions Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). On December 21, 2005, the Enforcement Bureau's Seattle District Office issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL") after determining that Clegg had apparently repeatedly imported and marketed non-authorized radio frequency devices. In this Order, we consider Clegg's argument that it was unaware that the device in question was in violation of the Commission's
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-1936A1.html
  • 29, 2006 By the Regional Director, South Central Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Forfeiture Order ("Order"), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) to Love's Travel Stops and Country Stores, Inc. ("Loves") for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted violation involves Love's offering for sale non-certified Citizens Band ("CB") transceivers. II. BACKGROUND 2. On October 15, 2001, and November 13, 2002, Enforcement Bureau field agents visited two Loves' retail outlets in Weatherford and Anna, Texas. At these locations, the stores displayed and offered for sale various models of non-certified CB transceivers marketed
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-2019A1.html
  • of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain wireless cameras, specifically, 10 Watt 1.2 GHz Wireless Camera Video AV Transmitter Receivers ("1.2 GHz wireless cameras"), that are not eligible to receive a grant of equipment certification, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803 and 15.205(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On August 30, 2005, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that LightObject d/b/a Actionbuy Trading Co. ("LightObject") was marketing on eBay
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-2229A1.html
  • Date: November 2, 2006 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Forfeiture Order ("Order"), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of eleven thousand two hundred dollars ($11,200) to Vitec Group Communications Limited ("Vitec") for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted violations involve Vitec's marketing of unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. II. BACKGROUND 1. In May 2005, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") received a complaint alleging that Clear-Com Communication Systems was marketing unapproved radiofrequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a) of the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-2286A1.html
  • ORDER Adopted: November 7, 2006 Released: November 9, 2006 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Forfeiture Order ("Order"), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) against AboCom Systems, Inc. ("AboCom") for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The violations involve marketing wireless access points that do not comply with the terms of its equipment authorization and the requirements of Section 15.247(d) of the Rules. 2. On July 17, 2006, the Spectrum Enforcement Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL") in the amount of $25,000 to AboCom. AboCom has not
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-2350A1.html
  • 2006 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Communications Specialists, Inc. ("CSI") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for apparent willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted apparent violations involve CSI's marketing of radio frequency devices in the United States that do not comply with the radiated emission limits set forth in Section 15.209 of the Rules and the periodic operation limits set forth in Section 15.231 of the Rules. II. BACKGROUND 2. CSI manufactures and markets the PT-1 "Petlocator"
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-2479A1.html
  • Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Forfeiture Order ("Order"), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of twenty-one thousand dollars ($21,000) to Wesley Noe, d.b.a. GI Joe's Radio Electronics and GI Joe's CB Radio (collectively referred to herein as "GI Joe's") for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, ("Act"), and Sections 2.803(a)(1), 2.815(b), and 2.815(c) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by offering for sale non-certified Citizens Band ("CB") transceivers and external radio frequency ("RF") power amplifiers. II. BACKGROUND 2. On April 19, 2006, the Detroit Office issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture in the amount of $21,000 to GI Joe's. In the NAL, the Detroit Office found that GI Joe's
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-2497A1.html
  • Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find American Future Technology Corporation d/b/a iBuypower ("iBuypower") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000) for apparent willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted apparent violations involve iBuypower's marketing of unauthorized computers to the general public. II. BACKGROUND 1. By letter dated November 29, 2005, the Commission's Office of Engineering and Technology ("OET") notified iBuypower of the apparent improper marketing of its AMD Athlon-64 and Athlon-64 X2 computers. Specifically, OET noted that iBuypower was marketing the computers
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-2499A1.html
  • OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: December 12, 2006 Released: December 14, 2006 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Memorandum Opinion and Order, we admonish Multispectral Solutions, Inc. ("MSSI") for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). II. BACKGROUND 2. MSSI manufactures and markets an ultra-wideband ("UWB") precision asset localization system that utilizes an UWB receiver and processor hub. The receiver and processor hub are classified as Class A digital devices and are required to be verified under Section 15.101(a) of the Rules. 3. On October 31, 2006, in response to a
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-2549A1.html
  • December 21, 2006 By the Regional Director, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Forfeiture Order ("Order"), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Gambler's CB & Ham Radio Sales & Service ("Gambler") for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules (the "Rules"), by offering for sale non-certified Citizens Band ("CB") transceivers. II. BACKGROUND 2. On April 5, 2004, the FCC Enforcement Bureau's Detroit Field Office ("Detroit Office") received information that Gambler was marketing illegal, non-FCC certified devices. Agents from the Detroit Office visited Gambler in Pinconning, Michigan on April 9, 2004, and observed that Gambler displayed
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-587A1.html
  • Myers, FL 33917 Re: File No. EB-05-SE-196 Dear Mr. Holbrook: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Section 2.803 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S 2.803. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. Your response dated December 5, 2005 to our Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") issued on November 22, 2005, acknowledged that you marketed an uncertified radiofrequency device for Citizen's Band ("CB") use, the Magnum
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-591A1.html
  • thousand six hundred dollars ($5,600) for marketing in the United States unauthorized intentional radiating devices, specifically, wireless monitoring devices used primarily by oil and gas companies for the collection of data and monitoring of remote well sites, process facilities and pipelines, in willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). II. BACKGROUND 2. On October 26, 2005, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Enforcement Bureau received an informal complaint alleging that OleumTech was manufacturing and marketing unauthorized radiofrequency devices. The complaint listed the model numbers of several transmitters which were allegedly unauthorized. In support of the allegation, the complainant explained that it ordered one of
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-606A1.html
  • Adopted: March 17, 2006 Released: March 21, 2006 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Forfeiture Order ("Order"), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000) against Gibson Tech Ed, Inc. ("Gibson") for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted violations involve Gibson marketing of two models (R-FM25B-WT) and (R-FM100B-WT) of unauthorized FM broadcast transmitters. 2. On September 1, 2005, the Enforcement Bureau, Spectrum Enforcement Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL") in the amount of $14,000 to Gibson. Gibson has not filed a response to the NAL. Based on
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-853A1.html
  • 2006 Released: April 17, 2006 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Forfeiture Order ("Order"), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seventeen thousand six hundred dollars ($17,600) to Hawking Technologies, Inc. ("Hawking") for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.204(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The violations involve marketing external radiofrequency power amplifiers in a manner that was inconsistent with the terms of its equipment authorization and the prohibition against the marketing of such devices. II. background 2. On December 9 and 14, 2004, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") received complaints alleging that Hawking was illegally marketing the Hawking
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-861A1.html
  • By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Vitec Group Communications Limited ("Vitec") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000) for apparent willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted apparent violations involve Vitec's marketing of unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. II. BACKGROUND 1. In May 2005, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") received a complaint alleging that Clear-Com Communication Systems ("Vitec") was marketing unapproved radiofrequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a)
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-999A1.html
  • Adopted: May 9, 2006 Released: May 11, 2006 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Forfeiture Order ("Order"), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of five thousand six hundred dollars ($5,600) against OleumTech Corporation ("OleumTech") for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted violations involve OleumTech's marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices, specifically, wireless monitoring devices used primarily by oil and gas companies for the collection of data and monitoring of remote well sites, process facilities and pipelines. 2. On March 17, 2006, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Enforcement Bureau issued a
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-13A1.html
  • February 16, 2006 By the Commission: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') and Order, we find that Behringer USA, Inc. (``Behringer'') marketed 50 models of unauthorized radio frequency devices specifically, digital audio music devices, in apparent willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'').2 Significantly, we find that Behringer continued to import and market substantial numbers of these unauthorized devices for more than a year after the Enforcement Bureau initiated an inquiry into Behringer's compliance with the Commission's equipment authorization requirements. Based on the facts and circumstances before us, including the egregious nature of Behringer's continued non-compliance, we conclude
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-30A1.html
  • this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we propose a forfeiture amount of seventy five thousand dollars ($75,000) against San Jose Navigation, Inc. ("San Jose") for its marketing of intentional radiating equipment, Global Positioning Satellite ("GPS") signal re-radiator kits, in apparent willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and Sections 2.803 and 15.205 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The GPS re-radiator kits are not Commission authorized and are not eligible for such authorization, because they operate in restricted frequency bands allocated for authorized safety-of-life operations. II. BACKGROUND 2. Section 302 of the Act authorizes the Commission to make reasonable regulations, consistent with the public interest, governing the interference potential of equipment
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-37A1.html
  • ORDER Adopted: March 21, 2006 Released: March 23, 2006 By the Commission: I. introduction 1. By this Forfeiture Order ("Order"), we find that ACR Electronics, Inc. ("ACR") marketed intentional radiating equipment prior to obtaining Commission certification in willful and repeated violation of the equipment marketing requirements of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). For these violations, we impose a monetary forfeiture in the amount of sixty five thousand dollars ($65,000). II. background 2. Section 302(b) of the Act provides that "[n]o person shall manufacture, import, sell, offer for sale, or ship devices of home electronic equipment and systems, or use devices, which fail to comply with regulations promulgated
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-53A1.html
  • 2006 Released: May 11, 2006 By the Commission: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Commission and Pilot Travel Centers LLC ("Pilot"). The Consent Decree terminates the forfeiture proceeding initiated by the Commission against Pilot for its apparent violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by offering for sale radio frequency devices without the required Commission equipment authorization. 2. The Commission and Pilot have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve this matter and terminate the forfeiture proceeding. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1271A1.html
  • the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Richard Mann d/b/a The Antique Radio Collector apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted apparent violations involve marketing of uncertified AM radio transmitters. II. background 2. On November 15, 2006, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Enforcement Bureau issued a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to The Antique Radio Collector in response to a complaint alleging that The Antique Radio Collector was marketing in the United States fully-assembled
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1313A1.html
  • 16, 2007 By the Regional Director, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Forfeiture Order ("Order"), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000) to Charles E. Vance, III d/b/a CB Candy Electronics ("Vance"), for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Commissions Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 2.815(c) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). On March 22, 2006, the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL") in the amount of $14,000 to Vance for offering for sale non-certified Citizens Band ("CB") transceivers and external RF power amplifiers in Ontario, California. In this Order, we affirm the findings of the Los
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1673A1.html
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Audio Direct is marketing the RMR-S201 and the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1674A1.html
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Buy.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1675A1.html
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Audio Discounters is marketing the RMR-S201 and the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1676A1.html
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Ambient Weather is marketing the RMR-S201 and the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1753A1.html
  • 812 Kings Highway Saugerties, NY 12477 Re: File No. EB-06-SE-365 Dear Mr. Krein: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Section 2.803 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S 2.803; for importing radio frequency devices that do not meet one or more of the specified import conditions in violation of Section 2.1204(a) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 2.1204(a); and for being unable to document compliance with the selected import conditions in violation of Section 2.1204(b) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1754A1.html
  • or Madam: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States a police radar jamming device manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-C450 device, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Chumbo.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1756A1.html
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that CompSource, Inc. is marketing the RMR-S201 and the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1757A1.html
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Cybergiftcenter.com, Inc. is marketing the RMR-S201 and the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1758A1.html
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Dealznet.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1760A1.html
  • Vitec Group Communications Limited ("Vitec"). Vitec seeks reconsideration of a Forfeiture Order issued by the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") to Vitec on October 31, 2006, which assessed a forfeiture of eleven thousand two hundred dollars ($11,200) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted violations involve Vitec's marketing of unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States. II. BACKGROUND 2. In May 2005, the Bureau received a complaint alleging that Clear-Com Communication Systems was marketing unapproved radiofrequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a) of the Rules. Specifically,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1763A1.html
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that TheElectronicCompany.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1764A1.html
  • Mr. Berkowitz: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States a police radar jamming device manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-C450 device, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Focus Camera, Inc. is marketing the RMR-S201 and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1766A1.html
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Fadfusion is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1767A1.html
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that DSMiller.com is marketing the RMR-S201 and the RMR-C450
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1784A1.html
  • by AboCom Systems, Inc. ("AboCom"). Abocom seeks reconsideration of a Forfeiture Order issued by the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau on November 7, 2006, in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000). In the Forfeiture Order, the Division found willful and repeated violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), involving AboCom's marketing of wireless access points that do not comply with the terms of its equipment authorization and the requirements of Section 15.247(d) of the Rules. II. background 2. In 2005, the Division received a report from Industry Canada indicating that a wireless access point marketed under an equipment certification granted to AboCom, FCC
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1789A1.html
  • 2007 Released: April 24, 2007 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau and Trimble Navigation, Limited ("TNL"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Enforcement Bureau into whether TNL violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the "Act"), and Section 2.803 of the Commission's Rules (the "Rules"), regarding the manufacture, importation, marketing and sale of unlicensed wireless devices. 2. The Enforcement Bureau and TNL have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve this matter and terminate the investigation. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. In the absence of new material
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-2994A1.html
  • an official CITATION, issued to Mr. Lance McCuistion, d/b as LM Services and Scorpion Jammer Technology ("Scorpion") pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States, specifically, the Scorpion "Ultimate" KA Jammer and Scorpion Jammer devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). In addition, you have failed to respond to directives of the Enforcement Bureau to provide certain information and documents. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On June 14, 2005, December 15, 2006, and January 25, 2007, staff from the Spectrum Enforcement Division observed on your
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-299A1.html
  • 31, 2007 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted apparent violations involve RMR's marketing of its RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 models of police radar jamming devices ("jammers"). II. background 2. The Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information, through several informal complaints, alleging that RMR was manufacturing and marketing unauthorized police radar jammers in the United States.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-304A1.html
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Auto-Radar-Detectors.com, were marketing police radar jamming
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-307A1.html
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Best Radar Detectors, were marketing police
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-308A1.html
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803 and 15.205. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Electronic Retail Solutions, Inc., were marketing police radar
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-309A1.html
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Global Trade Group, Inc., were marketing
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-310A1.html
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Hoeffener International, were marketing police radar
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-311A1.html
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803 and 15.205. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Radar Detectors Direct, were marketing police radar jamming
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-312A1.html
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including Radarjammers.com, were marketing police radar jamming
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-313A1.html
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. SS 2.803 and 15.205. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau obtained information through several informal complaints alleging that various entities, including The Twister Group, Inc., were marketing police radar
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-321A1.html
  • Lane Williamsville, NY 14221 Re: File No. EB-05-SE-174 Dear Mr. Struckmeyer: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(5), for marketing an unauthorized radio frequency device in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b), and Section 2.803 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S 2.803. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. The Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that DreamBox USA was importing and marketing unauthorized direct broadcast satellite receivers, the DreamBox DM500-S ("DM500-S") and the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3266A1.html
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Overseas Best Buy, Inc. dba 110220volts.com is marketing
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3270A1.html
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Unbeatablesale.com, Inc. is marketing the RMR-S201 and the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3392A1.html
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that ShoppersChoice.com, LLC is marketing the RMR-S201 and the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3393A1.html
  • Dear Sir/Madam: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-C450 device, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Shopila Corporation is marketing the RMR-C450 device. On
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3483A1.html
  • This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain police radar jamming devices manufactured by Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR"), specifically, the RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 devices, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 22, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Gain Saver is marketing the RMR-S201 and the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3599A1.html
  • ORDER Adopted: August 14, 2007 Released: August 16, 2007 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Forfeiture Order ("Order"), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) against Rocky Mountain Radar ("RMR") for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803, 15.205 and 15.209 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted violations involve RMR's marketing of its RMR-S201 and RMR-C450 models of police radar jamming devices. 2. On January 31, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL") in the amount of $25,000 to RMR. RMR has not filed a response to the NAL. Based
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3974A1.html
  • S: 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States certain wireless cameras and wireless camera converters, specifically, 10 Watt, 1.2 GHz Cantek Wireless Camera and Camera Converter Transmitter Receivers ("1.2 GHz wireless camera transmitter receivers"), that are not eligible to receive a grant of equipment certification, in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communication Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803 and 15.205(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. On February 6, 2007, staff in the Enforcement Bureau's Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") visited the internet store for Surveillance-Video products, www.surveillance-video.com ("Surveillance-Video online store"). The Surveillance-Video online store listed
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-4374A1.html
  • 2007 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Microwave Radio Communications LLC ("MRC") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 90.203 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted apparent violations involve the marketing of uncertified 4.9 GHz aeronautical transmitting equipment ("4.9 GHz equipment"). II. background 2. On January 10, 2007, the Commission's Office of Engineering and Technology ("OET") sent a letter to MRC in response to allegations that it may be manufacturing and marketing uncertified 4.9 GHz equipment. In
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-4449A1.html
  • N. Camac Street Philadelphia, PA 19133 Re: File No. EB-06-SE-222 Dear Mr. King: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Section 2.803 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S: 2.803. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry dated March 28, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau ("the Division") initiated an investigation into whether Basic Home Shopping is marketing in the United
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-452A1.html
  • ORDER Adopted: January 31, 2007 Released: February 2, 2007 By the Regional Director, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Forfeiture Order ("Order"), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000) to Jason Kaltenbach ("Kaltenbach") d/b/a Metamerchant, for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 302(b) of the Commissions Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted violation includes offering for sale non-certified VHF and UHF transceivers in Laguna Nigel, California. 2. On November 9, 2006, the District Director of the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL") in the amount of $14,000 to Kaltenbach. Despite repeated contacts by the Los Angeles Office,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-4570A1.html
  • I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Liam Patrick Ryan d/b/a L. P. Ryan / Low Power Radio ("Low Power Radio") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted apparent violations involve marketing of uncertified AM radio transmitters. II. background 2. On May 30, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Enforcement Bureau issued a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to Low Power Radio in response to information that Low Power Radio was marketing in the United States fully-assembled AM transmitters; specifically, the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-4716A1.html
  • 2007 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Forfeiture Order ("Order"), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Richard Mann d/b/a The Antique Radio Collector ("Antique Radio Collector") for willful and repeated violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted violations involve Antique Radio Collector's marketing of uncertified AM radio transmitters. II. background 2. Section 302(b) of the Act provides that "[n]o person shall manufacture, import, sell, offer for sale, or ship devices or home electronic equipment and systems, or use devices, which fail to comply with regulations promulgated pursuant to this section."
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-4874A1.html
  • No. EB-07-SE-194 Dear Mr. Melo: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), to BRD Security Products, Inc. d/b/a Spybase.com ("BRD") for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803 and 15.205(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry dated October 9, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau ("the Division") initiated an investigation into whether BRD is marketing in
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-4894A1.html
  • means the 4.9 GHz Carry-Coder II COFDM Digital Wireless Camera System. (f) "Commission" and "FCC" mean the Federal Communications Commission. (g) "Effective Date" means the date on which the Bureau releases the Adopting Order. (h) "Investigation" means the investigation commenced by the Bureau's May 23, 2007 Letter of Inquiry regarding whether BMS violated Section 302(b) of the Act and/or Section 2.803 of the Rules. (i) "Parties" means BMS and the Bureau. (j) "Rules" means the Commission's Rules found in Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations. III. BACKGROUND 3. BMS manufactures and distributes the Carry-Coder II ("CCII") COFDM Digital Wireless Camera System that operates in the 4.9 GHz band. The CCII System provides law enforcement and public safety agencies with
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-808A1.html
  • Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau and Communications Specialists, Inc. ("CSI"). The Consent Decree terminates the forfeiture proceeding initiated by the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Enforcement Bureau against CSI for its possible violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). 2. The Enforcement Bureau and CSI have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve this matter and terminate the forfeiture proceeding. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. Based on the record before us, we conclude that no substantial or material questions of fact exist
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-881A1.html
  • South Central Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Forfeiture Order ("Order"), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Ben Metzger dba 1 Stop Communications / 1 Stop CB Shop in Titusville, Florida for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted violation involves Mr. Metzger's offering for sale non-certified Citizens Band ("CB") transceivers. II. BACKGROUND 2. On March 21, 2006, the Commission's Tampa Office of the Enforcement Bureau ("Tampa Office") issued Mr. Metzger / 1 Stop Communications / 1 Stop CB Shop a Citation for marketing at his store in Titusville non-certified CB transceivers,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-100A1.html
  • FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: May 23, 2007 Released: June 1, 2007 By the Commission: I. INTRODUCTION 1. By this Forfeiture Order ("Order"), we find that Behringer USA, Inc. ("Behringer") marketed 50 models of unauthorized radio frequency equipment, specifically digital audio music devices, in willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). We further find that Behringer's violations warrant, and the record before us supports, the imposition of a forfeiture in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. Section 302(b) of the Act provides that "[n]o person shall manufacture, import, sell, offer for sale, or ship devices of home electronic equipment and systems, or
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-209A1.html
  • 3, 2007 By the Commission: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Austin Hughes Solutions, Inc. ("Austin Hughes") apparently liable for a forfeiture for marketing nine models of non-verified Class A digital devices in apparent willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). Based on the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that Austin Hughes is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of sixty-three thousand dollars ($63,000). II. background 2. Section 302 of the Act authorizes the Commission to make reasonable regulations, consistent with the public interest, governing the interference potential of equipment that emits
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-3A1.html
  • radiating equipment, specifically Global Positioning Satellite ("GPS") signal re-radiator kits, which are not authorized and not eligible for authorization by the Commission because the devices operate in restricted frequency bands. We further find that, in marketing these GPS signal re-radiator kits, San Jose willfully and repeatedly violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). For San Jose's violations, we impose a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. Section 302(b) of the Act provides that "[n]o person shall manufacture, import, sell, offer for sale, or ship devices of home electronic equipment and systems, or use devices, which fail to comply with
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-45A1.html
  • March 28, 2007 Released: April 2, 2007 By the Commission: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Hawking Technologies, Inc. ("Hawking") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.204(d) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The apparent violations involve marketing external radio frequency power amplifiers in a manner that was inconsistent with the terms of Hawking's equipment authorization and the requirements of Section 15.204(d) of the Rules. II. background 2. Section 302 of the Act authorizes the Commission to make reasonable regulations, consistent with the public interest, governing
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-49A1.html
  • FORFEITURE Adopted: March 30, 2007 Released: March 30, 2007 By the Commission: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Ramko Distributors, Inc. ("Ramko") apparently liable for marketing 17 models of non-certified radio transceivers, in apparent willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The subject devices are neither Commission authorized, nor eligible for such authorization. Based on the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that Ramko is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). II. background 2. Section 302 of the Act authorizes the Commission to make reasonable regulations,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1193A1.html
  • Victor McCormack Phonejammer.com Re: File No. EB-07-SE-031 Dear Mr. McCormack: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), to Phonejammer.com ("Phonejammer") for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and section 2.803 of the Commission's rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S: 2.803, and for failing to respond to Enforcement Bureau directives to provide certain information and documents. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry ("LOI") dated November 6, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Commission's
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1196A1.html
  • File No. EB-08-SE-202 Dear Mr. Bassler: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), to David Steele Enterprises, Inc. ("David Steele") for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803 and 15.205(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry of inquiry ("LOI") dated May 15, 2008, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau ("Division") initiated an investigation into whether David Steele
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1202A1.html
  • Kittridge Street #12 Reseda, California 91335-6164 Re: File No. EB-08-SE-203 Dear Mr. Henry: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803 and 15.205(a), and for failing to fully respond to Enforcement Bureau directives to provide certain information and documents. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry ("LOI") dated May 16, 2008, the Spectrum Enforcement
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1299A1.html
  • Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Forfeiture Order ("Order"), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of six hundred ten dollars ($610) to Liam Patrick Ryan d/b/a L. P. Ryan / Low Power Radio ("Low Power Radio") for the willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted violation involves Low Power Radio's marketing of uncertified AM radio transmitters. II. BACKGROUND 2. On May 30, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau issued a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to Low Power Radio in response to information alleging that Low Power Radio was marketing in the United States fully-assembled
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-155A1.html
  • Dear Ms. and Mr. Bollaro: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), to Garden State Investigations and Security ("Garden State") for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803 and 15.205(a). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry dated October 2, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau ("Division") initiated an investigation into whether Garden State is marketing in
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-167A1.html
  • January 29, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Ryzex, Inc. ("Ryzex") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of eight thousand dollars ($8,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted apparent violations involve Ryzex's marketing of noncompliant portable data terminals ("PDTs"). II. BACKGROUND 2. The Enforcement Bureau's Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") received a complaint alleging that Ryzex had modified PDTs manufactured by Symbol Technologies, Inc. ("Symbol") by replacing their two megabytes per second ("mbps") radio assemblies with 11 mbps radio assemblies without authorization
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1685A1.html
  • RECEIPT REQUESTED Vladimir Reznik, Owner RangeVideo Re: File No. EB-08-SE-182 Dear Mr. Reznik: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S: 2.803 and 15.205(a), and importing radio frequency devices without filing FCC Form 740 (or the electronic equivalent) with the United States Customs and Border Patrol, in violation of Section 1.1203 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S: 1.1203. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1754A1.html
  • Released: July 30, 2008 By the Regional Director, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Forfeiture Order ("Order"), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Michael T. Kersnowski ("Kersnowski"), d/b/a www.radioactiveradios.com, in Salem, Oregon, for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted violations involve Kersnowski's marketing and offering for sale non-certified Citizens Band ("CB") transceivers. 2. On March 28, 2008, the Resident Agent of the Enforcement Bureau's Portland Resident Agent Office issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL") in the amount of $7,000 to Kersnowski for offering for sale non-certified CB transceivers in
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1937A1.html
  • 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Microboards Technology, LLC ("Microboards") is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The apparent violations involve marketing unauthorized and non-compliant digital devices in the United States. II. background 2. The Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Microboards was marketing the Orbit 3 Disc Duplicator, and the MicroOrbit Disc Duplicator digital video disc ("DVD") and/or compact disc ("CD") duplicators in the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1951A1.html
  • 25, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Leetek America, Inc. ("Leetek") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000) for willful and repeated violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted apparent violations involve Leetek's marketing of two unauthorized pager transmitter systems. II. BACKGROUND 2. Leetek is the United States subsidiary of Lee Technology Korea Co., Ltd. ("LTK"). LTK manufactures pager transmitter systems, which are devices used for communicating in, for example, restaurants and hospitals. LTK established Leetek as its United States subsidiary in
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1952A1.html
  • 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Data Capture Solutions, Inc. ("DCS") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of four thousand dollars ($4,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted apparent violations involve DCS's marketing of noncompliant portable data terminals ("PDTs"). II. BACKGROUND 2. The Enforcement Bureau's Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") received a complaint alleging that DCS had modified a PDT manufactured by Symbol Technologies, Inc. ("Symbol") by replacing the two megabytes per second ("mbps") radio assembly with an 11 mbps radio assembly
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2042A1.html
  • September 8, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find CoachComm, LLC ("CoachComm") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for willful and repeated violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted apparent violations involve the marketing of an unauthorized radio frequency device. II. background 2. On August 15, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Enforcement Bureau ("Division") received a complaint regarding CoachComm's manufacture and marketing of a wireless intercom system under the trade name Connex that uses a belt pack and base station
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2051A1.html
  • Maurine Lane Grand Junction, CO 81504 Re: File No. EB-08-SE-034 Dear Mr. Marston: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Section 2.803 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S: 2.803. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry ("LOI") dated June 3, 2008, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau ("the Division") initiated an investigation into whether MicroVideoX, LLC, ("MicroVideoX") is marketing in the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2052A1.html
  • 11, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Wavetrend Technologies, Ltd. ("Wavetrend"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Wavetrend for possible violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") regarding the marketing of certain radio frequency identification devices. 2. The Bureau and Wavetrend have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2437A1.html
  • By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find XLNT Idea, Inc. ("XLNT Idea") is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000) for willful and repeated violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The apparent violations involve marketing unauthorized digital devices in the United States. II. background 2. The Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that XLNT Idea was marketing the Nexis 100AP AutoPrinter, the Nexis 100AP Publisher, and the Xi440 CD/DVD Printer in the United States without the appropriate labels as
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2673A1.html
  • 10, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Multi-Tech Systems, Inc. ("Multi-Tech") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of four thousand dollars ($4,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.105(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted apparent violations involve Multi-Tech's marketing of a radio frequency device without including the required consumer disclosure in the user manual. II. BACKGROUND 2. Multi-Tech is a manufacturer of communications and device networking products that provide voice and data services over internet protocol networks. One of its products, the CallFinder(R) Global System
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2734A1.html
  • 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Redflex Traffic Systems, Inc. ("Redflex"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Redflex for possible violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803(a), 2.925, 15.19, 15.201 and 90.203 of the Commission's rules ("Rules") regarding the marketing and use of two models of radar speed meter equipment. 2. The Bureau and Redflex have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-472A1.html
  • 29, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find DBK Concepts, Inc. ("DBK") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted apparent violations involve DBK's marketing of noncompliant portable data terminals ("PDTs"). II. BACKGROUND 2. The Enforcement Bureau's Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") received a complaint alleging that DBK had modified PDTs manufactured by Symbol Technologies, Inc. ("Symbol") by replacing their two megabytes per second ("mbps") radio assemblies with 11 mbps radio assemblies without authorization
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-528A1.html
  • By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Memorandum Opinion and Order, we admonish Global Microwave Systems, Inc. ("GMS") for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices, specifically, uncertified 4.9 GHz aeronautical transmitting equipment ("4.9 GHz equipment"), in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 90.203 of the Commission's rules ("rules"). II. BACKGROUND 2. GMS manufactures and markets microwave radio systems and other devices. On January 10, 2007, the Commission's Office of Engineering and Technology ("OET") sent a letter to GMS in response to allegations that it may be manufacturing and marketing uncertified 4.9 GHz equipment. In its response to OET's letter, GMS acknowledged
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-597A1.html
  • 2008 By the Regional Director, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Forfeiture Order ("Order"), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to CB Shop & More, LLLP ("CB Shop"), in Loveland, Colorado, for willful and repeated violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). On August 28, 2007, the Enforcement Bureau's Denver Office issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL") to CB Shop after determining that CB Shop offered for sale a non-certified Citizens Band ("CB") transceiver. In this Order, we consider CB Shop's argument that the CB transceiver at issue did not require Commission certification. II.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-74A1.html
  • South 1675 West Orem, UT 84058 Re: File No. EB-07-SE-250 Dear Mr. Royer: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and section 2.803 of the Commission's rules ("rules"), 47 C.F.R. S: 2.803. In addition, you have failed to respond to directives of the Enforcement Bureau to provide certain information and documents. As explained below, future violations of these rules may subject Absolute Toy Marketing, Inc. to monetary forfeitures. After receiving a complaint, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau began an
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-968A1.html
  • Mann d/b/a The Antique Radio Collector ("Antique Radio Collector"). Antique Radio Collector seeks reconsideration of a Forfeiture Order issued by the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau on November 27, 2007, in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for willful and repeated violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted violations involved Antique Radio Collector's marketing of uncertified AM radio transmitters. II. BACKGROUND 2. On November 15, 2006, the Division sent a letter of inquiry ("LOI") to Antique Radio Collector in response to a complaint alleging that Antique Radio Collector was marketing in the United States fully assembled uncertified AM transmitters, specifically the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1697A1.html
  • Division St., Suite 155 Spokane, WA 99218 Re: File No. EB-08-SE-602 Dear Mr. O'Harvey: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to The Spy Store, Inc. ("Spy Store") for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), and importing radio frequency devices without filing FCC Form 740 (or the electronic equivalent) with the United States Customs and Border Patrol in violation of Section 2.1203 of the Rules. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1824A1.html
  • Re: File No. EB-09-SE-134 Dear Mr. Dach: This is an official CITATION issued to Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. ("Wal-Mart"), pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), for marketing non-compliant radio frequency devices, specifically, the Astak CM-918T2 wireless security camera ("Astak CM-918T2), in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803, 15.209 and 15.249(d) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In March 2009, the Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that the Astak CM-918T2 is causing harmful interference to Sprint Nextel's licensed operation of its iDEN network in the 800 MHz and 900
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-27A1.html
  • 16, 2009 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Silver Spring Networks ("Silver Spring"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau into whether Silver Spring violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.212(a)(vi)(A) of the Commission's rules ("Rules") regarding the marketing and labeling of a modular utility meter transmitter. 2. The Bureau and Silver Spring have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-407A1.html
  • Drive Ontario, CA 91761 Re: File No. EB-08-SE-531 Dear Mr. Chen: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 503(b)(5), for marketing unauthorized and non-compliant radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803 and 15.239(b) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803 and 15.239(b). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. By letter of inquiry ("LOI") dated June 18, 2008, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Commission's Enforcement Bureau initiated an investigation into whether Macally USA Mace Group, Inc.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-7A1.html
  • 2009 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Arkion Systems, LLC ("Arkion"). The Consent Decree is for the purpose of terminating the Bureau's investigation into whether Arkion violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803(a), 2.925 and 15.19 of the Commission's rules ("Rules") regarding the marketing and use of four models of utility meter transmitters. 2. The Bureau and Arkion have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-831A1.html
  • ProLingo pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), for marketing in the United States a radio frequency device, specifically, the Listentech LT700 transmitter, in a manner inconsistent with the terms of its authorization and the requirements of Section 15.237 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 15.237 of the Rules. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In response to a complaint alleging that ProLingo was marketing, as a component of its simultaneous language interpretation systems, certain transmitters that operate on frequencies in the 72-76 MHz band which are restricted under Section 15.237
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/FCC-09-25A1.html
  • ) FRN # 0012065009 FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: March 27, 2009 Released: March 31, 2009 By the Commission: 1. In this Forfeiture Order ("Order"), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) to Hawking Technologies, Inc. ("Hawking") for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.204(d) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The apparent violations involve marketing external radio frequency power amplifiers in a manner that was inconsistent with the terms of Hawking's equipment authorization and the requirements of Section 15.204(d) of the Rules. 2. On April 2, 2007, the Commission issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL") in the amount of $50,000
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-09-2623A1.html
  • Suffern, NY 10901-3834 Re: File No. EB-08-SE-142 Dear Mr. Lee: This is an official CITATION, issued to SCS Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Spy Camera Specialists, Inc. ("Spy Camera"), pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In March 2008, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Enforcement Bureau ("Division") received a complaint alleging that Spy Camera was marketing unauthorized wireless video transmitters that operate in the 1.08, 1.12, 1.16 and 1.2
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-1088A1.html
  • Head Boulevard Naples, FL 34110 Re: File No. EB-09-SE-124 Dear Mr. Kallstrom: This is an official CITATION, issued to USA Shutter Company, LLC, d/b/a MaestroShield, ("USA Shutter"), pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Sections 2.803 and 15.201 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In 2009, the Commission received a complaint alleging that USA Shutter was marketing unauthorized wireless remote control transmitters used to control window shutters. The complaint was referred to the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-1256A1.html
  • 6, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Wireless Extenders, Inc. ("Wi-Ex") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of four thousand dollars ($4,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted apparent violation involves Wi-Ex's marketing of radio frequency devices that are not labeled in accordance with Section 2.925(a)(1) of the Rules. II. BACKGROUND 2. The Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Wi-Ex was marketing a dual band cellular/PCS signal booster ("booster") that was labeled with FCC Identification number SO4YX510-PCS-CEL, an FCC ID
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-1257A1.html
  • July 6, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Cellphone-Mate Inc. ("Cellphone-Mate") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of four thousand dollars ($4,000) for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted apparent violation involves Cellphone-Mate's marketing of radio frequency devices that are not labeled in accordance with Section 2.925(a)(1) of the Rules. II. BACKGROUND 2. The Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that Cellphone-Mate's SureCall(TM) Model CM2000-WL dual band cellular/PCS signal amplifier ("amplifier) was labeled with FCC Identification number RSNDUAL-62UNDER, an FCC ID number
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-1321A1.html
  • 20, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Qomo HiteVision, LLC ("Qomo"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Qomo for possible violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803(a) and 15.201(b) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") regarding the marketing of unauthorized radio frequency response systems. 2. The Bureau and Qomo have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-1511A1.html
  • August 27, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Kannad SAS ("Kannad"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Kannad for possible violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), regarding Kannad's marketing of 406.0-406.1 MHz emergency locator transmitters ("406 MHz ELTs") that were not labeled in accordance with Section 87.199(f) the Rules. 2. The Bureau and Kannad have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-1897A1.html
  • October 4, 2010 Released: October 4, 2010 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Callaway Golf Company ("Callaway"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau into whether Callaway violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803, 15.19, 15.31(j), and 15.107(a) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"), regarding the marketing of computer peripheral devices and a battery charger. 2. The Bureau and Callaway have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2187A1.html
  • 18, 2010 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to Wolf Seeberg Video for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). 2. Wolf Seeberg Video should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may subject your company to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of equipment, and criminal sanctions. II. background
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2188A1.html
  • 18, 2010 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to Able Cine Tech for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). 2. Able Cine Tech should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may subject your company to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of equipment, and criminal sanctions. II. background
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2189A1.html
  • the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to South Bay Film and Video Services for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). 2. South Bay Film and Video Services should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Commission's Rules in this regard may subject your company to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of equipment, and criminal
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2220A1.html
  • 23, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), to Hobby Lobby International, Inc. ("HLI") for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). 2. HLI should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Rules in this regard may subject your company to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of equipment, and criminal sanctions. II. background 3. The Office
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2240A1.html
  • 2010 By the District Director, Columbia Office, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), to Jammer World/theJammerStore.com ("Jammer World") for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). 2. Jammer World should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Rules in this regard may subject your company to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of equipment, and criminal sanctions. II. background 3. On
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2290A1.html
  • December 8, 2010 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and RF Linx Corporation ("RF Linx"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against RF Linx for possible violations of section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and sections 2.803(a), 2.925, and 15.204(d)(1), (2) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"), regarding RF Linx's marketing of external radio frequency power amplifiers. 2. The Bureau and RF Linx have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2295A1.html
  • Released: December 6, 2010 By the District Director, Columbia Office, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), to Everbuying.com for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). 2. Everbuying.com should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Rules in this regard may subject your company to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of equipment, and criminal sanctions. II. background 3. On July
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-521A1.html
  • By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Enhanced Vision Systems, Inc. ("Enhanced Vision"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Enhanced Vision for possible violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Sections 2.803(a), 15.19, 15.21, and 15.105 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") regarding the marketing of Class B Digital Devices, specifically, vision assistance products for the legally blind. 2. The Bureau and Enhanced Vision have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-616A1.html
  • the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Motorola, Inc. ("Motorola"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Motorola for possible violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), 47 U.S.C. S: 302a(b), and Sections 2.803(a), 2.926(e), 15.37(l), and 15.407(h) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803(a), 2.926(e), 15.37(l), and 15.407(h), regarding the marketing and labeling of Unlicensed National Information Infrastructure (U-NII) devices. 2. The Bureau and Motorola have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-618A1.html
  • 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Airspan Networks (Israel), Ltd. ("Airspan"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Airspan for possible violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803, 2.925, and 15. 407(h)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") regarding the marketing and selling of unlicensed National Information Infrastructure ("U-NII") devices. 2. The Bureau and Airspan have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-669A1.html
  • 20, 2010 Released: April 20, 2010 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Phonejammer.com ("Phonejammer") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of twenty five thousand dollars ($25,000) for willful and repeated violations of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Section 2.803 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The noted apparent violations involve the marketing in the United States of radio frequency devices designed to intentionally interfere with licensed cellular and Personal Communications Services ("PCS"). II. BACKGROUND 2. On May 22, 2008, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") issued a Citation to Phonejammer pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-689A1.html
  • 23, 2010 Released: April 26, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Axxcelera Broadband Wireless, Inc. ("Axxcelera"). The Consent Decree terminates the Bureau's investigation into Axxcelera's possible violations of Section 302(b) the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 15.407(h)(2) of the Commission's Rules, regarding the marketing of unlicensed National Information Infrastructure ("U-NII") devices. 2. The Bureau and Axxcelera have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-7A1.html
  • 2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29416 Re: File No. EB-09-SE-087 Dear Mr. Wolf: This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to MALAA GeoScience USA, Inc. ("MALAA") for marketing in the United States an unauthorized radio frequency device in violation of Section 302(b) of the Act ("Act"), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), and for importing a radio frequency device without filing FCC Form 740 (or the electronic equivalent) with the United States Customs and Border Patrol in violation of Section 2.1203 of the Rules. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In April of 2009,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-804A1.html
  • 2010 Released: May 14, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Entone, Inc. ("Entone"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau into whether Entone violated Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, ("Act"), and Sections 2.803(a), 2.925, 2.1074, 2.1204, and 15.19 of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") regarding the marketing, labeling, and identification of unauthorized radio frequency devices. 2. The Bureau and Entone have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/FCC-09-107A1.html
  • this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Commission and San Jose Technology, Inc. (formerly known as San Jose Navigation, Inc.) (collectively "San Jose"). The Consent Decree terminates the Commission's enforcement proceeding regarding San Jose's compliance with the equipment requirements set forth in Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and Sections 2.803 and 15.205 of the Commission's Rules. 2. The Commission and San Jose have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve this matter and terminate the enforcement proceeding. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. Based on the available facts related to this matter, we conclude that there are no substantial
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1164A1.html
  • Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), to New Generation Hobbies ("New Generation") for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices that operate on restricted frequencies in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the rules ("Rules") of the Federal Communications Commission ("Commission" or "FCC"). 2. New Generation should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Rules in this regard may subject your company to substantial monetary penalties, seizure
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1165A1.html
  • By the Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), to Sound Around Inc. ("Sound Around") for marketing in the United States radiofrequency devices that operate on restricted frequencies in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act and sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the rules ("Rules") of the Federal Communications Commission ("Commission"), and for marketing wireless microphones that are capable of operating in the 700 MHz band (698-806 MHz) in violation of section 74.851(g) of the Rules. 2. Sound Around should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct, including removing from display
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1188A1.html
  • Director, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") of the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC" or "Commission") and ReconRobotics, Inc. ("ReconRobotics"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau into whether ReconRobotics violated section 302a(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and section 2.803 of the Commission's rules ("Rules"), regarding the manufacturing, marketing, distributing, and selling of radio frequency transmitters. 2. The Bureau and ReconRobotics have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-125A1.html
  • January 26, 2011 By the Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), to DeadlyDeal.com ("Deadly Deal") for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and section 2.803 of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). 2. Deadly Deal should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Rules in this regard may subject your company to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of equipment and criminal sanctions. II. bACKGROUND 3. By
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-135A1.html
  • 26, 2011 By the Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), to Comtrex Communications Ltd. ("Comtrex") for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and section 2.803 of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). 2. Comtrex should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Rules in this regard may subject your company to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of equipment, and criminal sanctions. II. BACKGROUND 3. On June
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1468A1.html
  • Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find Marshall Amplification PLC ("Marshall") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand two hundred dollars ($7,200) for its apparent willful and repeated violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and sections 2.803(a)(2) and 15.105(b) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). The noted apparent violations involve Marshall's marketing of a Class B digital audio radio frequency device in the United States without providing mandatory disclosures to consumers in the device's user manual. II. BACKGROUND 2. On July 12, 2010, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau issued a letter of inquiry to
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1661A1.html
  • Act"), to each of the companies listed in the caption to this Citation and in Appendix A attached hereto (each, an "Online Vendor," and collectively, the "Online Vendors") for marketing in the United States a total of 215 uniquely described models of cell, GPS, and other signal jamming devices in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act and sections 2.803 and 15.201(b) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). 2. Signal jamming devices pose significant risks to public safety and potentially compromise other radio communications services. Each Online Vendor must take immediate steps to cease marketing signal jamming devices to consumers in the United States and its territories and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. This may include actions such as
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1720A1.html
  • of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), to Spy Gallery, Inc. ("Spy Gallery") for marketing to consumers in the United States and its territories ("United States") unauthorized radio frequency devices - cell phone signal blockers and Global Positioning System ("GPS") signal jammers (collectively, "signal jamming devices") - in violation of section 302(b) of the Act, and sections 2.803 and 15.201(b) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). 2. Spy Gallery should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct, including actions such as removing illegal signal jamming devices from displays and declining to sell signal jamming devices in the United States. Signal jamming devices pose significant risks to public safety and potentially compromise
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1911A1.html
  • November 17, 2011 By the District Director, Los Angeles District Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Custom Interface Technologies, a Division of Thornstar Corporation ("CIT"), in Joshua Tree, California, willfully and repeatedly violated section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and sections 2.803(a)(1) and 74.851(f) of the Commission's rules ("Rules") by manufacturing and marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices. We conclude that CIT is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. In May and June, 2010, the Enforcement Bureau's Los Angeles Office ("Los Angeles Office") investigated allegations that uncertified video assist transmitters were being sold
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-246A1.html
  • Ltd. ("Shenzhen") to show cause why the equipment authorization it holds under FCC ID No. XRLTG-VIPJAMM should not be revoked and why a Forfeiture Order in an amount not to exceed one hundred and twelve thousand five hundred dollars ($112,500) should not be issued against Shenzhen for willfully and/or repeatedly violating sections 302(b) and 333 of the Act and sections 2.803, 2.907(b), 2.931, 2.932, 2.936 and 2.946 of the Rules. II. BACKGROUND 2. In response to complaints regarding the marketing of a radio frequency device called the TxTStopper(TM) that is advertised as preventing cell phone use in moving motor vehicles, the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the FCC's Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") launched an investigation. The Division staff observed that the txtstopper.com
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-247A1.html
  • 2011 By the Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), to Share Enterprises Unlimited, Inc. ("Share") for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and section 2.803 of the Commission's rules ("Rules"), and for providing incorrect, material factual information to the Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") of the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") in violation of section 1.17(a)(2) of the Rules. 2. Share should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-248A1.html
  • 2011 Released: February 9, 2011 By the Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), to DealExtreme for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"), and for failing to respond to Enforcement Bureau Letters of Inquiry ("LOIs") directing DealExtreme to provide certain information and documents. 2. DealExtreme should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. In addition, you must to respond to the Enforcement Bureau's June 12, 2009 LOI within
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-408A1.html
  • March 3, 2011 By the District Director, Los Angeles Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), to SecurityMan, Inc. ("SecurityMan") for marketing non-compliant radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of section 302(b) of the Act, and section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's rules. 2. SecurityMan should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of equipment, and criminal sanctions. II. background 3. In December
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-5A1.html
  • the District Director, Detroit Office, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), to Doctor Radio's CB Shop ("Doctor Radio") for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). 2. Doctor Radio should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Rules in this regard may subject your company to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of equipment, and criminal sanctions. II. background 3. On
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-754A1.html
  • 2011 Released: April 28, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and PreSonus Audio Electronics, Inc. ("PreSonus"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Bureau regarding PreSonus's compliance with section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and sections 2.803, 2.1203, 15.19, and 15.105 of the Commission's rules ("Rules") pertaining to the marketing of unauthorized Class B digital audio radio frequency devices. 2. The Bureau and PreSonus have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that would resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-812A1.html
  • Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), to GadgetTown d/b/a GadgetTown.com ("GadgetTown") for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices - cell phone signal blockers and GPS signal jammers - in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and section 2.803 of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). 2. GadgetTown should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. These jamming devices pose significant risks to public safety and other radio communications services. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Rules in this regard may subject your company to
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-885A1.html
  • 19, 2011 Released: May 20, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Luxul Wireless, Inc. ("Luxul"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Bureau regarding Luxul's compliance with section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and sections 2.803(a), 2.925, and 15.204(d)(1), (2) of the Commission's rules ("Rules") pertaining to the marketing of external radio frequency power amplifiers. 2. The Bureau and Luxul have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that would resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-924A1.html
  • Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), to Pyong Kon Eun for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices - cell phone signal blockers and GPS signal jammers - in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and section 2.803 of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). 2. Pyong Kon Eun should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. These jamming devices pose significant risks to public safety and other radio communications services. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-976A1.html
  • 1, 2011 By the Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find SmartLabs, Inc. ("SmartLabs") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of ten thousand dollars ($10,000) for willful and repeated violations of section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), and section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). The apparent violations involve SmartLabs' marketing of an unauthorized radio frequency device. II. BACKGROUND 2. By letter of inquiry ("LOI") dated May 21, 2010, the Enforcement Bureau's Spectrum Enforcement Division ("Division") initiated an investigation into whether SmartLabs had marketed the INSTEON(R) RemoteLinc(TM) Wireless Remote Control Model #2440 ("RemoteLinc") prior to authorization of this device in
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-984A1.html
  • 1. This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), to Gary L. Stanford, d.b.a. Spark Gap CB Shop ("Spark Gap CB") for marketing in the United States unauthorized radio frequency devices and external radio frequency power amplifiers in violation of section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and sections 2.803(a)(1) and 2.815(b) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). 2. Spark Gap CB should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Rules in this regard may subject you to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of equipment, and criminal sanctions. II. background
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-98A1.html
  • the District Director, Columbia Office, Northeast Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. This is an official CITATION issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act"), to New Century Technology Limited ("New Century") for marketing unauthorized radio frequency devices in the United States in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). 2. New Century should take immediate steps to come into compliance and to avoid any recurrence of this misconduct. As explained below, and as provided in the Communications Act, future violations of the Rules in this regard may subject your company to substantial monetary penalties, seizure of equipment, and criminal sanctions. II. background 3. On
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2012/DA-12-270A1.html
  • 2012 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (Bureau) of the Federal Communications Commission and American Music and Sound (AMS). The Consent Decree resolves and terminates the Bureau's investigation into AMS's compliance with Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (Act), and Sections 2.803, 2.1203, 15.19, 15.21, and 15.105 of the Commission's rules (Rules) pertaining to the marketing of unauthorized Class A digital audio radio frequency devices. 2. The Bureau and AMS have negotiated the Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2012/DA-12-360A1.html
  • the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (Bureau) of the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) and ETI Sound Systems, Inc. (ETI). The Consent Decree resolves and terminates the Bureau's investigation into ETI's compliance with Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the Act), and Sections 2.803, 2.1203, 15.19, 15.21, and 15.105 of the Commission's rules (Rules) pertaining to the marketing of digital radio frequency devices, including guitar amplifiers, CD/MP3 players, and active speaker systems. 2. The Bureau and ETI have negotiated the Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 3. After reviewing the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2012/DA-12-42A1.html
  • By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") of the Federal Communications Commission ("Commission") and Hawking Technologies, Inc. ("Hawking"). The Consent Decree settles an enforcement proceeding against Hawking regarding Hawking's compliance with section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the "Act"), and sections 2.803(a) and 15.204(d) of the Commission's rules in connection with its marketing of certain external radio frequency power amplifiers. 2. The Bureau and Hawking have negotiated the Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2012/DA-12-574A1.html
  • In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (Bureau) of the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) and Richard Mann d/b/a The Antique Radio Collector (Mr. Mann). The Consent Decree settles an enforcement proceeding regarding Mr. Mann's willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (Act), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's rules (Rules) in connection with the marketing in the United States of uncertified AM radio transmitters assembled from kits. 2. The Bureau and Mr. Mann have negotiated the Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2012/DA-12-63A1.html
  • Region, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order (NAL), we find US Jetting, Inc. (US Jetting) apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of eight thousand four hundred dollars ($8,400) for its apparent willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (Act), and Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 15.201(b) of the Commission's rules (Rules). The noted apparent violations involve US Jetting's marketing of radio frequency devices in the United States prior to obtaining Commission authorization for such devices. Further, we order US Jetting to submit a statement signed under penalty of perjury by an officer or director of the company stating that it is no longer marketing
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2012/DA-12-745A1.html
  • Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. On November 27, 2007, the Spectrum Enforcement Division (Division) of the Enforcement Bureau (Bureau) issued a Forfeiture Order against Richard Mann d/b/a The Antique Radio Collector (Mr. Mann), assessing a forfeiture in the amount of $7,000 for the willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (Act), and Section 2.803(a)(1) of the Commission's rules (Rules) in connection with the marketing in the United States of uncertified AM radio transmitters assembled from kits. On December 27, 2007, Mr. Mann filed an Appeal of Forfeiture Order in which he sought cancellation or reduction of the forfeiture. On April 30, 2008, the Bureau released the Reconsideration Order, which affirmed the Forfeiture Order and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/da002090.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/da002090.txt
  • September 14, 2000 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Memorandum Opinion and Order (``Order''), we deny The Two Way Shop's Petition for Reconsideration of the $7,000 Forfeiture Order that we issued to it on April 7, 2000. The Two Way Shop willfully and repeatedly violated Section 302 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803 and 2.815 of the Commission's Rules by offering linear amplifiers for sale. 2. In a letter dated May 3, 2000, the Two Way Shop responded to the Forfeiture Order. We will treat the May 3, 2000 letter as a Petition for Reconsideration of the Forfeiture Order. 3. The Two Way Shop raises one new issue in its Petition for Reconsideration.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/da002810.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/da002810.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/da002810.txt
  • � 302. 47 C.F.R. � 2.907. Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, NAL/No. X3248003 (Enf. Bur., Atlanta Office, released May 9, 2000). FCC Identifier NX3SKY2000. The grant was originally issued on August 18, 1998, and was updated to reflect a modification of the device on July 13, 1999. 47 C.F.R. � 15.239. 47 U.S.C. � 302(b) and 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(a)(1). See 47 C.F.R. � 2.907. Section 312(f)(1) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. � 312(f)(1), which also applies to Section 503(b) of the Act, provides: ``the term `willful,' when used with reference to the commission or omission of any act, means the conscious and deliberate commission or omission of such act, irrespective of any intent to violate any provision of this
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/da002915.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/da002915.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/da002915.txt
  • Louisiana ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File Number EB-00-OR-104 NAL/Acct. No. X3262010 FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: December 28, 2000 Released: December 29, 2000 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) against Stephen Fowler d/b/a Exports R Us, for willfully violating Sections 2.803 and 2.815 of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by marketing an unauthorized external frequency power amplifier. On September 28, 2000, the Commission's New Orleans, Louisiana Field Office issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) to Stephen Fowler d/b/a Exports R Us. Stephen Fowler d/b/a Exports R Us has not filed a response.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/da00475.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/da00475.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/da00475.txt
  • Bureau: 1. This order imposes a forfeiture against Leslie D. Brewer, d/b/a/ L.D. Brewer's 2-way Radio (collectively, ``Mr. Brewer''), in the amount of $10,000, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``the Act''), 47 U.S.C. � 503(b), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules (``the Rules''), 47 C.F.R. � 1.80, for willful violation of Sections 2.803(a)(1), and 15.201(b) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803(a)(1), and 15.201(b). These violations are based on the marketing of a transmitter not authorized by the Commission. The transmitter at issue was sold to an undercover agent of the Commission's Tampa, Florida Field Office. BACKGROUND 2. In early 1997, an agent from the Tampa Field Office visited L.D. Brewer's 2-Way Radio
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/da00579.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/da00579.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/da00579.txt
  • 14, 1999, by Cellular Systems Northwest, Inc. (``Northwest''). Northwest seeks reconsideration of the Forfeiture Order released March 15, 1999, in which the former Compliance and Information Bureau (``Bureau'') found it liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of $7,000 for willful and repeated violations of Section 302 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``the Act'') and Sections 2.803 and 2.815 of the Commission's Rules (``the Rules'') relating to the sale of transmitting equipment. For the reasons discussed below, we deny the petition for reconsideration and affirm the monetary forfeiture of $7,000. BACKGROUND 2. Northwest is a consumer electronics dealer in Enumclaw, Washington. On July 9, 1997, Northwest sold and offered to sell external radio frequency power amplifiers --
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/da00765.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/da00765.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/da00765.txt
  • Adopted: April 6, 2000 Released: April 7, 2000 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) against the Two Way Shop (``Two Way'') for willful and repeated violations of Section 302 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Sections 2.803 and 2.815 of the of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). These violations involve Two Way's offer for sale of linear amplifiers capable of operation in the 26.965 to 27.405 MHz frequency band. On July 14, 1999, the Commission's Seattle, Washington, Field Office, issued the referenced Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of seven
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-02-1367A1.html
  • 1.903 (Authorization Required). San Diego, CA District Office (5/17/02). * Mount Rushmore Broadcasting, Inc., KAWK(FM), Custer, SD. $10,000 NAL. Denver, CO District Office (5/31/02). * California Speedway, Fontana, CA. $10,000 NAL. Los Angeles, CA District Office (5/30/02). * 47 U.S.C. 302 - Devices Which Interfere With Radio Reception * Lightning Electronics, Inc., Miami, FL. $7,000 NAL. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. 2.803 (Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization). Tampa, FL District Office (5/21/02). 47 C.F.R. Part 11 Emergency Alert System Rules * 47 C.F.R. 11.35 Equipment Operational Readiness * Fenix Broadcasting Corp., Miami, FL. $21,000 NAL. Other violations: 47 C.F.R. 17.51 (Time When Lights Should Be Exhibited) and 73.49 (AM Transmission System Fencing Requirements). Tampa, FL District Office (5/7/02).
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-02-197A1.html
  • Services * 47 C.F.R. 95.410 (CB Rule 10) How Much Power May I Use? * Emerson Owerns, Detroit, MI. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. 95.411 ((CB Rule 11) May I Use Power Amplifiers?). Detroit, MI District Office (12/14/01). CITATIONS Communications Act * 47 U.S.C. 302 Devices Which Interfere With Radio Reception * TravelCenters of America, Arvin, CA. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. 2.803 (Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization). Los Angeles, CA District Office (12/3/01). * TravelCenters of America, Buttonwillow, CA. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. 2.803 (Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization). Los Angeles, CA District Office (12/3/01). * ABC Phone, Brooklyn, NY. New York, NY District Office (12/5/01). * Beeper Street, Chris Bruner, Somerville, NJ. New
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-02-402A1.html
  • PA. $10,000 NAL. Philadelphia, PA District Office (1/10/02). * Rev. Dr. Philius Nicholas, Brooklyn, NY. $10,000 NAL. New York, NY District Office (1/10/02). * Thomas A. Brothers, Berkley, MI. $11,000 NAL. Detroit, MI District Office (1/14/02). * CTI of Miami, Inc., Miami, FL. $ 17,000 NAL. Other violations: 47 U.S.C. 302a (Devices Which Interfere With Radio Reception) and 47 C.F.R. 2.803 (Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization). Tampa, FL District Office (1/24/02). 47 C.F.R. Part 73 Radio Broadcast Services * 47 C.F.R. 73.3538 Application to Make Changes in an Existing Station * ACS Television LLC, Eagle River, AK. $13,000 NAL. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. 74.780 (Broadcast Regulations Applicable to Translators, Low Power, and Booster Stations). Anchorage, AK Resident
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-02-724A1.html
  • PA District Office (2/1/02). * AmeriPage Wireless, Lakewood, CA. Los Angeles, CA District Office (2/4/02). * Get Connected, Los Angeles, CA. Los Angeles, CA District Office (2/4/02). * National Cellular, Brooklyn NY. New York, NY District Office (2/4/02). * Power Cell, La Puente, CA. Los Angeles, CA District Office (2/4/02). * Delconn Wireless Products, Anaheim, CA. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. 2.803 (Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization). Los Angeles, CA District Office (2/5/02). * Mr. Mahmoud Salem, Stockton, CA. San Francisco, CA District Office (2/6/02). * The Cell Gallery, Tracy, CA. San Francisco, CA District Office (2/6/02). * Blue Rock Wireless, Inc., MS. New Orleans, LA District Office (2/7/02). * Wireless Dimensions, Inc., McLean, VA. Columbia, MD District
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-02-929A1.html
  • Office (3/18/02). CITATIONS Communications Act * 47 U.S.C. 302 Devices Which Interfere With Radio Reception * Abie Hamideh d.b.a. Planet Wireless, Garland, TX. Dallas, TX District Office (3/4/02). * Salena Kinney, Earl Troutman, and Rigo Ochoa d.b.a. Arken Communications, Plano, TX. Dallas, TX District Office (3/4/02). * Mr. Michael B. Faulkner, Express Electronics Inc., Longview, TX. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. 2.803 (Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization). Dallas, TX District Office (3/5/02). * Pilot Travel Center #282, Barstow, CA. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. 2.803 (Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization). Los Angeles, CA District Office (3/5/02). * Pilot Travel Center, North Las Vegas, NV. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. 2.803 (Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-03-2923A1.html
  • significantly exceed the Part 15 emission limits, they present a serious potential for harmful interference to licensed radio services. The Enforcement Bureau is considering appropriate enforcement action against Vector for importing and marketing radio frequency devices that do not comply with the FCC's technical standards in violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 2.803(a) of the Rules. This public notice is intended to warn retailers that continued marketing of the six models of Vector battery chargers referenced above will constitute a violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803(a) of the Rules and may result in sanctions, including monetary forfeitures. For further information contact Suzanne Tetreault at 202-418-7450 or Kathy Berthot at
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-05-1776A1.html
  • cellular jammers suggest that the devices may be used on commuter trains, in theaters, hotels, restaurants and other locations the public frequents. The Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and the FCC rules prohibit the manufacture, importation, marketing, sale or operation of these devices within the United States (See Section 302(b) of the Communications Act, 47 USC 302a(b) and Section 2.803(a) of the FCC's rules, 47 CFR 2.803(a)). In addition, it is unlawful for any person to willfully or maliciously interfere with the radio communications of any station licensed or authorized under the Act or operated by the U.S. Government (See Section 333 of the Communications Act, 47 USC 333). Further, Section 301 of the Act, 47 USC 301, requires persons
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-11-249A1.html
  • actions is available at www.fcc.gov/eb/jammerenforcement. What is Prohibited? Federal law prohibits the manufacture, marketing, and operation of jammers in the United States. As to operation, section 333 of the Communications Act prohibits "willful or malicious" interference to authorized radio communications, and thus prohibits the operation of jammers. As to manufacture and marketing, section 302(b) of the Communications Act and section 2.803 of the Commission's rules prohibit the manufacture, import, sale, offer for sale, or shipment of devices that do not comply with the FCC's rules. In turn, the FCC prohibits the marketing of radio frequency devices in the United States unless the devices are properly authorized or meet other applicable requirements. Jammers, by definition, can never be authorized because they are
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da001683.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da001683.html
  • Inc., Walled Lake, MI. Detroit, MI District Office (6/12/00). Transport One, Inc., d/b/a Imperial Car Service, Long Island City, NY, WPMK-242. New York, NY District Office (6/19/00). Cox Communications, KNNB712, Atlanta, GA. Boston, MA District Office (6/23/00). CITATIONS Communications Act 47 U.S.C. � 302 - Devices Which Interfere With Radio Reception Westell, Inc., Aurora, IL. Other violations: 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803 (Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization) and 15.19 (Labelling Requirements). Chicago, IL District Office (6/21/00). 47 C.F.R. Part 15 - Radio Frequency Devices 47 C.F.R. � 15.109 - Radiated Emission Limits Ramada Inn, New Port Richey, FL. Tampa, FL District Office (6/19/00). 2 q s y z } � � � � $ $ � � |�
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da001850.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da001850.html
  • Requirements). Denver, CO District Office (7/21/00). 47 C.F.R. � 90.425 - Station Identification Monsey New Square Trails Corporation, WPJH-744, Alpine, NJ. New York, NY District Office (7/6/00). Fernando Nuesi, d.b.a.Atlantic Car Service, WPMS-544, Brooklyn, NY. New York, NY District Office (7/7/00). CITATIONS 47 C.F.R. Part 2 - Frequency Allocations and Radio Treaty Matters; General Rules and Regulations 47 C.F.R. � 2.803 - Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization Xended Camera Support, Inc., St. Paul, MN. Other violations: 47 C.F.R. �� 2.925 (Identification of Equipment), 2.926 (FCC Identifier), and 15.101 (Equipment Authorization of Unintended Radiators). Los Angeles, CA District Office (7/10/00). Digital Cinema Products Corp., Huntington Beach, CA. Other violations: 47 C.F.R. �� 2.925 (Identification of Equipment), 2.926 (FCC
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da002136.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da002136.html
  • Detroit, MI District Office (8/15/00). Lucas G. Heartsill, San Angelo, TX. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. � 97.119(Station Identification). Detroit, MI District Office (8/15/00) Nancy B. Heartsill, San Angelo, TX. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. � 97.119(Station Identification). Detroit, MI District Office (8/15/00) CITATIONS 47 C.F.R. Part 2 - Frequency Allocations and Radio Treaty Matters; General Rules and Regulations 47 C.F.R. � 2.803 - Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization Tansvideo, North Hollywood, CA. Los Angeles, CA District Office (8/4/00). Electronics Unlimited, Frederick, MD. Columbia, MD District Office (8/16/00). % & W Y � � � $ $ % & X Y F X |� ��PNG �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� �� � �a�% Tf(c) U~��Uy�Ӛ�o=�c� {�YAD
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da002408.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da002408.html
  • with the instructions and by the deadline set forth in the NAL, NOV or Citation. NOTICES OF APPARENT LIABILITY Communications Act 47 U.S.C. � 301 - Unlicensed Operation Hormigonera Chaparro Inc. Aguada, PR. $5,000 NAL. San Juan, PR Resident Agent Office (9/26/00). 47 C.F.R. Part 2 - Frequency Allocations and Radio Treaty Matters; General Rules and Regulations 47 C.F.R. � 2.803 - Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization Stephen Fowler d/b/a Exports R Us., Pineville LA. $7,000 NAL. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. � 2.815 (External Radio Frequency Power Amplifiers). New Orleans, LA District Office (9/28/00). 47 C.F.R. Part 17 - Construction, Marking and Lighting of Antenna Structures 47 C.F.R. � 17.4 - Antenna Structure Registration Natchez Communications, Inc.,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da002635.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da002635.html
  • VA Resident Agent Office (10/19/00). 47 C.F.R. � 17.51 - Time When Lights Should Be Exhibited Netcom Technologies, Inc. San Juan, PR. $13,000 NAL. San Juan, PR Resident Agent Office (10/20/00). NOTICES OF VIOLATION Communications Act 47 U.S.C. � 302a - Devices Which Interfere With Radio Reception Mikes CB Sales and Service, Green Bay, WI. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior To Equipment Authorization). Chicago, IL District Office (10/4/00). 47 C.F.R. Part 1 - Practice and Procedure 47 C.F.R. � 1.89 - Notice of Violation Schindler Elevator Corp., KNGK438, Morristown, NJ. Boston, MA District Office (10/18/00). Route 66 Broadcasting Company, Santa Rosa, New Mexico. Denver, CO District Office (10/26/00). 47 C.F.R. � 1.903 - Authorization Required
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da00813.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da00813.html
  • Lakeland, FL. NOV also issued for violation of 47 C.F.R. � 95.411. Tampa, FL Office (3/28/00). Edward Mills, St. Augustine, FL. Tampa, FL Office (3/28/00). 47 C.F.R. Part 97 (Amateur Radio Service) 47 C.F.R. � 97.307 (Emission Standards) Lawrence C. Metzger, Bordentown, N2GBK, Pittsburgh, PA. Philadelphia, PA Office (3/16/00). CITATIONS Communications Act 47 U.S.C. � 302 and/or 47 C.F.R. � 2.803 (sale and marketing of non-certified equipment) National Wholesale Liquidators, Inc., Flushing, NY. New York, NY Office (3/14/00). Electronic Wonders Computers & Digital Imaging, New York, NY. New York, NY Office (3/21/00). T.P. Electronics, Chicago, IL. Chicago, IL Office (3/23/00). | $ $ $ { | ��PNG �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� �� � �a�% Tf(c) U~��Uy�Ӛ�o=�c� {�YAD
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da011019.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da011019.html
  • Operating Requirements). Denver, CO District Office (3/15/01). 47 C.F.R. � 90.403 - General Operating Requirements Atlantic Wireless, Inc, WPMM-224, Rochelle Park, NJ. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. � 90.425 (Station Identification). New York, NY District Office (3/30/01). CITATIONS Communications Act 47 U.S.C. � 302 - Devices Which Interfere With Radio Reception CTI of Miami, Miami, FL. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. � 2.803 (Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization) . Miami, FL Resident Agent Office (3/26/01). CANCELLED NOTICES OF VIOLATION Western Wireless Corporation, Bellevue, WA. Saint Paul, MN Resident Agent Office (1/16/01). Cancelled 1/24/01. ) e g - $ $ ( ) f g � F � � � � ��PNG �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� ��
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da011314.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da011314.html
  • WV. Other violations: 47 C.F.R. �� 95.410 ((CB Rule 10) How Much Power May I Use?) and 95.411 ((CB Rule 11) May I Use Power Amplifiers?). Columbia, MD District Office (4/11/01). Steve Wheeler, JR, Berlin, MD. Columbia, MD District Office (4/26/01). CITATIONS 47 C.F.R. Part 2 - Frequency Allocation and Radio Treaty Matters; General Rules and Regulations 47 C.F.R. � 2.803 - Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization A.R.Cellular Accessories, Inc, Brooklyn NY. Philadelphia, PA District Office (4/9/01). Innovision Optics, Santa Monica, CA. Other violations: 47 C.F.R. �� 2.925 (Identification of Equipment) and 2.926 (FCC Identifier) and 15.201 (Equipment Authorization Requirement). Los Angeles, CA District Office (4/17/01). 47 C.F.R. Part 15 - Radio Frequency Devices 47 C.F.R. �
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da011644.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da011644.html
  • C. Colflesh, Willards, MD. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. � 95.411 ((CB Rule 11) May I Use Power Amplifiers?). Columbia, MD District Office (5/9/01). CITATIONS Communications Act 47 U.S.C. � 302 - Devices Which Interfere With Radio Reception First Choice Wireless, LLC, Lake Mary, FL. Tampa, FL District Office (5/8/01). High Tech CB Shop, Jacksonville, FL. Other violations: 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803 (Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization) and 2.815 (External Radio Frequency Power Amplifiers). Tampa, FL District Office (5/9/01). White Diamond Communications, Inc., San Juan, PR. San Juan, PR Resident Agent Office (5/14/01). Cell-Station, Inc., Oldsmar, FL. Tampa, FL District Office (5/22/01). 47 C.F.R. Part 15 - Radio Frequency Devices 47 C.F.R. � 15.204 - External Radio Frequency
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da012031.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da012031.html
  • and Associated Control Equipment The Original Company, Inc., WBTO-FM, Petersburg, IN. $5,000 NAL. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. � 17.48 (Notification of Extinguishment or Improper Functioning of Lights). Chicago, IL District Office (7/3/01). NOTICES OF VIOLATION Communications Act 47 U,S.C. � 302 - Devices Which Interfere With Radio Reception Fifties Inc. d.b.a. Fifties Communications, San Juan, PR. Other violation: 47 C.F.R.� 2.803 (Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization). San Juan, PR Resident Agent Office (7/23/01). 47 C.F.R. Part 1 - Practice and Procedure 47 C.F.R. � 1.923 - Content of Applications Electronic Communications of WV Inc., WNQE563, NQE723, WNSS299 WPHM360, WPQA433 and ASR# 103090, Kopperston, WV. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. � 17.4(g) (Posting of Antenna Structure Registration Numbers). Columbia,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da012273.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da012273.pdf
  • Use? * Angel Guillermety, Levttown, PR. San Juan, PR Resident Agent Office (8/23/01). * 47 C.F.R. 95.413 (CB Rule 13) What Communcations Are Prohibited? * The Truck Wash, West Memphis, AR. New Orleans, LA District Office (8/2/01). CITATIONS Communications Act * 47 U.S.C. 302 Devices Which Interfere With Radio Reception * Custom Electronics, Witt Springs, AR. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. 2.803 (Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization). New Orleans, LA District Office (8/30/01) References 1. http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da012273.pdf 2. http://www.fcc.gov/ 3. ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da012540.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da012540.pdf
  • Brooklyn, NY. New York, NY District Office (9/4/01). * K & T Photo Electronics, Flushing, NY. New York, NY District Office (9/4/01). * Jade Mountain, Boulder, CO. Denver, CO District Office (9/5/01). * Deer 1 Electronics, Tampa, FL. Tampa, FL District Office (9/25/01). 47 C.F.R. Part 2 Frequency Allocation and Radio Treaty Matters; General Rules and Regulations * 47 C.F.R. 2.803 Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization * TRUCK-N-TRAVEL, Coburg, Oregon. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. 15.101(Equipment Authorization of Unintentional Radiators). Portland, OR Resident Agent Office (9/17/01). 47 C.F.R. Part 15 Radio Frequency Devices * 47 C.F.R. 15.5 General Conditions of Operation * Impact Video, Las Vegas, Nevada. Seattle, WA District Office (9/28/01). * 47 C.F.R. 15.109 Radiated Emission
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da012948.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da012948.pdf
  • Service * 47 C.F.R. 97.103 Station Licensee Responsibilities * Stanley Clewett KF6IKC, Redding, CA. San Francisco, CA District Office (11/21/01). Terms of Station Authorization * First State Bank, Socorro, NM (WNFT448). Denver, CO District Office (11/7/01). CITATIONS Communications Act * 47 U.S.C. 302 Devices Which Interfere With Radio Reception * TravelCenters of America, Inc., Troutdale, Oregon. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. 2.803 (Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization). Portland, OR Resident Agent Office (11/19/01). * TravelCenters of America, Inc., Aurora, Oregon. Other violation: 47 C.F.R. 2.803 (Marketing of Radio Frequency Devices Prior to Equipment Authorization). Portland, OR Resident Agent Office (11/19/01). * American PCS, New York, NY. New York, NY District Office (11/20/01). * A I Telecom, Inc., Niles,
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-05-2382A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-05-2382A1.pdf
  • September 1, 2005 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division: I. INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find Gibson Tech Ed, Inc. (``Gibson'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000) for apparent willful and repeated violation of Sections 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted apparent violations involve Gibson's marketing of two models of unauthorized FM broadcast transmitters. II. BACKGROUND On June 30, 2004, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') issued Gibson a Citation for marketing unauthorized FM broadcast transmission equipment manufactured by Veronica Ltd. (``Veronica''), in violation Section 302(b) of the Act and Section 2.803 of the Rules, and
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-606A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-606A1.pdf
  • ORDER Adopted: March 17, 2006 Released: March 21, 2006 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Forfeiture Order (``Order''), we issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of fourteen thousand dollars ($14,000) against Gibson Tech Ed, Inc. (``Gibson'') for willful and repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), and Section 2.803(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The noted violations involve Gibson marketing of two models (R-FM25B-WT) and (R-FM100B-WT) of unauthorized FM broadcast transmitters. On September 1, 2005, the Enforcement Bureau, Spectrum Enforcement Division issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') in the amount of $14,000 to Gibson. Gibson has not filed a response to the NAL. Based on the
• http://www.fcc.gov/fees/2000oetguide.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fees/2000oetguide.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/fees/2000oetguide.txt
  • of the USA, use 999999999 as the TIN or SSN. o EQUIPMENT AUTHORIZATION PROCEDURES The equipment approval of a radio frequency device may be covered by ``Certification.'' 1/ Marketing and/or importing equipment in the United States that is subject to Certification prior to the issuance of a Grant of Equipment Authorization (FCC Form 731A) is prohibited by 47 CFR, Section 2.803 of the rules and Section 302 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (The Act). Violation of the rules and the Act may subject the violator to the fines and forfeitures specified in Sections 501 and 503 of the Act. -B1- o APPLICANT FOR EQUIPMENT AUTHORIZATION The applicant for equipment authorization should be a party who can accept the