FCC Web Documents citing 2.906

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-321A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-321A1.pdf
  • Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to DreamBox USA (April 19, 2006). Letter from Carl W. Struckmeyer to Brian Butler, Assistant Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission (May 13, 2006). See Sections 2.907, 2.911 and 2.913 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 2.907, 2.911, and 2.913. See Sections 2.906, 2.909 and 2.1071 through 2.1077 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R.�� 2.906, 2.909, and 2.1071 through 2.1077. Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to One-O-One iSolutions, Inc. (October 2, 2006). Letter from Christoph Goeltner, to Gabriel Collazo, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission (November 5, 2006). See Section 1.80(b)(3) of
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1897A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1897A1.pdf
  • 15.31(j), 15.107(a). 47 U. S. C. �154(i) 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311 47 U. S. C. � 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803(a), 15.19, 15.31(j), 15.107(a). A ``Declaration of Conformity is a procedure where the responsible party . . . makes measurements or takes other necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards.'' 47 C.F.R. � 2.906. Federal Communications Commission DA 10- 1897 Federal Communications Commission DA 10- 1897 Federal Communications Commission DA 10-1897 � � � F ; < � � ; < � � � �@ ; < � � ; < � � � �@ �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� ��
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-754A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-754A1.pdf
  • which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction.'' 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(z). Section 15.3(i) of the Rules defines ``Class B digital device'' as ``a digital device that is marketed for use in a residential environment notwithstanding use in commercial, business and industrial environments.'' 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(i). See 47 C.F.R. � 2.902. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.906. 47 C.F.R. � 15.107. 47 C.F.R. � 15.109. 47 C.F.R. � 15.19. 47 C.F.R. � 15.105. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1203; see also 47 C.F.R. �� 2.1204, 2.1205. See LOI, supra note 3. See Letter from Clifford M. Harrington and Tony Lin, Counsel for PreSonus Audio Electronics, Inc. to Nissa Laughner, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission (September 10,
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-45A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-45A1.pdf
  • Bodies, based on representations and test data submitted by the applicant. 47 C.F.R. � 2.907(a). A Declaration of Conformity is a procedure where the responsible party - the manufacturer, or in the case of imported equipment, the importer - makes measurements or takes other necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. 47 C.F.R. � 2.906(a). Under the Declaration of Conformity procedure, the measurements must be made by an FCC-accredited laboratory. 47 C.F.R. � 2.948(a)(3). In addition, a copy of the Declaration of Conformity listing the party responsible for compliance must be included in the literature supplied with the product. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1077. Verification is also a procedure where the manufacturer, or in the case
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3189A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3189A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3189A1.txt
  • authorized prior to marketing in accordance with DOC or certification procedures. VIA asserts in its response to our LOI that it authorized its model EPIA-M and EPIA-CL CPU boards in accordance with the DOC procedures. However, VIA admits that it only tested these CPU boards for compliance with the Part 15 emission limits with the SSC function enabled. Under Section 2.906(b) of the Rules, a DOC attaches only to items subsequently marketed by the responsible party which are identical to the sample tested and found acceptable by the responsible party. Furthermore, under Section 2.1073 of the Rules, the responsible party must warrant that each unit of equipment marketed under a DOC is identical to the unit tested and found acceptable with
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1436A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1436A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1436A1.txt
  • from James Ho, OvisLink Technologies, Corp. to Jackie Ellington, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission (December 2, 2005). Id. A Declaration of Conformity is a procedure where the responsible party, as defined in 47 C.F.R. � 2.909, makes measurements or takes other necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. 47 C.F.R. � 2.906. 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(o) defines an intentional radiator as ``A device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy by radiation or induction.'' Certification is an equipment authorization issued by the Commission, based on representations and test data submitted by the applicant. 47 C.F.R. � 2.907(a). 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(e)(4) defines marketing as the ``sale or lease, or offering for sale or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.txt
  • rules eliminate the need for manufacturers to obtain FCC approval before marketing new personal computer products and thus allow such products to reach the marketplace more quickly. These rules all align the FCC's equipment authorization requirements for personal computers with those used in other parts of the world. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 154, 302, 303, 307. Section Number and Title: 2.906 Declaration of Conformity. 2.909 Responsible Party. 2.1071 Cross Reference. 2.1072 Limitation on Declaration of Conformity. 2.1073 Responsibilities. 2.1074 Identification. 2.1075 Retention of Records. 2.1076 FCC inspection and submission of equipment for testing. 2.1077 Compliance information. PART 15-RADIO FREQUENCY DEVICES SUBPART A-GENERAL Brief Description: These rules specify the testing and labeling requirements for the ``Declaration of Conformity'' (DoC) procedure which permits
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2497A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2497A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2497A1.txt
  • Bureau 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. � 2.803(a)(2). See Letter from Ray LaForge, Chief, Audits and Compliance Branch, Office of Engineering and Technology, dated November 29, 2005. A Declaration of Conformity is a procedure where the responsible party makes measurements or takes other necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. 47 C.F.R. � 2.906(a). Under the Declaration of Conformity procedure, the measurements must be made by an FCC-accredited laboratory. 47 C.F.R. � 2.948(a)(3). In addition, a copy of the Declaration of Conformity listing the party responsible for compliance must be included in the literature supplied with the product. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1077. Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-321A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-321A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-321A1.txt
  • Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to DreamBox USA (April 19, 2006). Letter from Carl W. Struckmeyer to Brian Butler, Assistant Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission (May 13, 2006). See Sections 2.907, 2.911 and 2.913 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 2.907, 2.911, and 2.913. See Sections 2.906, 2.909 and 2.1071 through 2.1077 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R.�� 2.906, 2.909, and 2.1071 through 2.1077. Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to One-O-One iSolutions, Inc. (October 2, 2006). Letter from Christoph Goeltner, to Gabriel Collazo, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission (November 5, 2006). See Section 1.80(b)(3) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2049A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2049A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2049A1.txt
  • Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. U.S. Postal Service first-class, Express, and Priority mail must be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW, Washington DC 20554. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (tty). For more information or questions pertaining to this document, please contact George Tannahill at (301) 362-3026, george.tannahill@fcc.gov. - 47 C.F.R. �2.901. 47 C.F.R. �2.906. 47 C.F.R. �2.948 (a)(3). See Report and Order in ET Docket No. 95-19, Amendment of Parts 2 and 15 of the Commission's Rules to Deregulate the Equipment Authorization Requirements for Digital Devices 11 FCC Rcd 17915, 17932 (2006). 47 C.F.R �� 2,960, 2.962 (c)(3). In additional to being accredited test laboratories, TCBs also have to satisfy other requirements to qualify
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1897A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1897A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1897A1.txt
  • 15.31(j), 15.107(a). 47 U. S. C. �154(i) 47 C.F.R. �� 0.111, 0.311 47 U. S. C. � 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. �� 2.803(a), 15.19, 15.31(j), 15.107(a). A ``Declaration of Conformity is a procedure where the responsible party . . . makes measurements or takes other necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards.'' 47 C.F.R. � 2.906. Federal Communications Commission DA 10- 1897 Federal Communications Commission DA 10- 1897 Federal Communications Commission DA 10-1897 � � � F ; < � � ; < � � � �@ ; < � � ; < � � � �@ �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2011A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2011A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2011A1.txt
  • a base unit may only access the telephone network when the code transmitted by the handset matches the code set in the base unit, and that a handset may only ring when the code transmitted by the base unit matches the code set in the handset. See 47 C.F.R. � 15.121(a)(1). The Declaration of Conformity procedure is described in Section 2.906, and the certification procedure is described in Section 2.907. See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.906 and 2.907. Amendment of Parts 2 and 15 of the Commission's Rules to Deregulate the Equipment Authorization Requirements for Digital Devices, Report and Order, ET Docket No. 95-19, 11 FCC Rcd 17915 (1996). The digital TV transition date was subsequently extended to June 12, 2009. The
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-754A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-754A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-754A1.txt
  • which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction.'' 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(z). Section 15.3(i) of the Rules defines ``Class B digital device'' as ``a digital device that is marketed for use in a residential environment notwithstanding use in commercial, business and industrial environments.'' 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(i). See 47 C.F.R. � 2.902. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.906. 47 C.F.R. � 15.107. 47 C.F.R. � 15.109. 47 C.F.R. � 15.19. 47 C.F.R. � 15.105. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1203; see also 47 C.F.R. �� 2.1204, 2.1205. See LOI, supra note 3. See Letter from Clifford M. Harrington and Tony Lin, Counsel for PreSonus Audio Electronics, Inc. to Nissa Laughner, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission (September 10,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-400A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-400A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-400A1.txt
  • at 10540, para. 38. TIA Comments at 14. Notice, 15 FCC Rcd at 10548, para. 64. 47 C.F.R. � 68.102. MRA Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 24708, para. 48. Notice, 15 FCC Rcd at 10547, para. 63. 47 U.S.C. � 161. Notice, 15 FCC Rcd at 10548, para. 64. Id., 15 FCC Rcd at 10548, para. 64. 47 C.F.R. � 2.906. Notice, 15 FCC Rcd at 10548, para. 64. 47 C.F.R. � 2.902(a). 47 C.F.R. � 68.3(b)(3). MRA Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 24691, 24707, paras. 10, 45. Notice, 15 FCC Rcd at 10548, para. 64. Id., 15 FCC Rcd at 10551-552, para. 74-75. See 47 U.S.C. � 151. See supra n.22. See Part 68 First Report and Order, 56 FCC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-157A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-157A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-157A1.txt
  • measurements or takes the necessary steps to insure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.902. A Declaration of Conformity is a procedure where the responsible party, as defined in � 2.909, makes measurements or takes other necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.906. Certification is an equipment authorization issued by the Commission or its designated entities, based on representations and test data submitted by the applicant. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.907. See Notice at � 26. An intentional radiator is a device that intentionally generates and emits RF energy by radiation or induction. See 47 C.F.R. � 15.3(o). It has been found to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-100A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-100A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-100A1.txt
  • 12, supra. See 47 U.S.C. � 302(a). The Commission recently made changes to Part 2 of the rules to allow designated private organizations, called Telecommunication Certification Bodies (TCBs), to approve equipment in the same manner as the Commission. See Report and Order in GEN Docket 98-68, 13 FCC Rcd 24687 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 2.907. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.906. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.948(d). The laboratory must be accredited by the American Association for Laboratory Accreditation (A2LA), the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) or a Designating Authority of a trading partner having a Mutual Recognition Agreement/Arrangement (MRA) with the United States See 47 C.F.R. � 2.902. See description of In-House PLB systems in � 13. Although each computer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-245A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-245A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-245A1.txt
  • 3(b)(1). See 47 U.S.C. � 302(a). In 1999, the Commission made changes to Part 2 of the rules to allow designated private organizations, called Telecommunication Certification Bodies (TCBs), to approve equipment in the same manner as the Commission, see Report and Order in GEN Docket 98-68, 13 FCC Rcd 24687 (1999). See 47 C.F.R. � 2.907. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.906. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.948(d). The laboratory must be accredited by the American Association for Laboratory Accreditation (A2LA), the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) or a Designating Authority of a trading partner having a Mutual Recognition Agreement/Arrangement (MRA) with the United States See 47 C.F.R. � 2.902. See Notice at �44. Id. See comments of Ameren at 10; UPLC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-263A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-263A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-263A1.txt
  • Comments (Joint Supplemental Comments) of Sirius and XM Radio, ET Docket No. 98-42 (March 4, 2001), at 9. See Joint Supplemental Comments. See 47 C.F.R. �18.203. Consumer ISM equipment are authorized under either the Declaration of Conformity or Certification procedure prior to use or marketing. Non-consumer ISM equipment are subject to the verification procedure. See also, 47 C.F.R. �� 2.902, 2.906 & 2.907. See 47 C.F.R. �18.305(c). See 47 C.F.R. �18.111. Federal Communications Commission FCC 04-263 Federal Communications Commission FCC 04-XXX Non-Public - For Internal Use only 03/12/2004 c c d � � . C | � � � � � ` @0 ` @0 c �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-13A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-13A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-13A1.txt
  • Bodies, based on representations and test data submitted by the applicant. 47 C.F.R. � 2.907(a). A Declaration of Conformity is a procedure where the responsible party - the manufacturer, or in the case of imported equipment, the importer - makes measurements or takes other necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. 47 C.F.R. � 2.906(a). Under the Declaration of Conformity procedure, the measurements must be made by an FCC-accredited laboratory. 47 C.F.R. � 2.948(a)(3). In addition, a copy of the Declaration of Conformity listing the party responsible for compliance must be included in the literature supplied with the product. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1077. Verification is also a procedure where the manufacturer, or in the case
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-30A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-30A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-30A1.txt
  • in that proceeding expressed concern that GPS re-radiator devices could interfere with accurate E911 location reporting. Id. at note 4. A DOC is a procedure where the responsible party - the manufacturer, or in the case of imported equipment, the importer - has measurements taken to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.906(a). Under the DOC procedure, the measurements must be made by an FCC-accredited laboratory. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.948(a)(3). In addition, a copy of the DOC listing the party responsible for compliance must be included in the literature supplied with the product. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.1077. The DOC procedure may be used only for certain types of unintentional radiators. See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-45A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-45A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-45A1.txt
  • Bodies, based on representations and test data submitted by the applicant. 47 C.F.R. � 2.907(a). A Declaration of Conformity is a procedure where the responsible party - the manufacturer, or in the case of imported equipment, the importer - makes measurements or takes other necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. 47 C.F.R. � 2.906(a). Under the Declaration of Conformity procedure, the measurements must be made by an FCC-accredited laboratory. 47 C.F.R. � 2.948(a)(3). In addition, a copy of the Declaration of Conformity listing the party responsible for compliance must be included in the literature supplied with the product. 47 C.F.R. � 2.1077. Verification is also a procedure where the manufacturer, or in the case
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-82A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-82A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-82A1.txt
  • Certification Body (TCB) on behalf of the Commission based on an application and test data submitted by the responsible party (manufacturer or importer). Declaration of Conformity (DoC) is an equipment authorization procedure that requires the responsible party to make measurements or take other necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.906, 2.909. Verification is an equipment authorization procedure under which the responsible party makes measurements or takes the necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.909(b), 2.953. See 47 C.F.R. � 2.901 et seq. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. �� 24.51, 27.51, which require that personal communications services (PCS) and WCS devices
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-82A1_Rcd.pdf
  • recognized Telecommunication Certification Body (TCB) on behalf of the Commission based on an application and test data submitted by the responsible party (manufacturer or importer). Declaration of Conformity (DoC)is an equipment authorization procedure that requires the responsible party to make measurements or take other necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. See47 C.F.R. �� 2.906, 2.909. Verification is an equipment authorization procedure under which the responsible party makes measurements or takes the necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. See47 C.F.R. �� 2.909(b), 2.953. 709See 47 C.F.R. � 2.901 et seq. 710See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. �� 24.51, 27.51, which require that personal communications services (PCS) and WCS devices be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-60A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-60A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-60A1.txt
  • stand ready to implement further reforms to the process that will allow technically compliant devices to reach the marketplace more quickly. See 47 C.F.R. Part 2 Subpart J. See 47 U.S.C. � 302a(a). See 47 U.S.C. � 302a(b). See 47 C.F.R. Part 2, Subpart J, � 2.901, et seq. See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.907 and 2.962. See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.906 and 2.902. See 47 C.F.R. �� 2.925-2.926. See Revisions of Parts 2, 15, 18, and 83 of the Rules and Regulations to set up a single system of identification for all devices covered under the equipment authorization program, Report and Order, Docket No. 20790, 70 FCC 2d 2346 (1979). The three-character format is codified in Section 2.926(c) and shown in
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00400.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00400.txt
  • at 10540, para. 38. TIA Comments at 14. Notice, 15 FCC Rcd at 10548, para. 64. 47 C.F.R. � 68.102. MRA Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 24708, para. 48. Notice, 15 FCC Rcd at 10547, para. 63. 47 U.S.C. � 161. Notice, 15 FCC Rcd at 10548, para. 64. Id., 15 FCC Rcd at 10548, para. 64. 47 C.F.R. � 2.906. Notice, 15 FCC Rcd at 10548, para. 64. 47 C.F.R. � 2.902(a). 47 C.F.R. � 68.3(b)(3). MRA Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 24691, 24707, paras. 10, 45. Notice, 15 FCC Rcd at 10548, para. 64. Id., 15 FCC Rcd at 10551-552, para. 74-75. See 47 U.S.C. � 151. See supra n.22. See Part 68 First Report and Order, 56 FCC
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-3189A1.html
  • authorized prior to marketing in accordance with DOC or certification procedures. VIA asserts in its response to our LOI that it authorized its model EPIA-M and EPIA-CL CPU boards in accordance with the DOC procedures. However, VIA admits that it only tested these CPU boards for compliance with the Part 15 emission limits with the SSC function enabled. Under Section 2.906(b) of the Rules,12 a DOC attaches only to items subsequently marketed by the responsible party which are identical13 to the sample tested and found acceptable by the responsible party. Furthermore, under Section 2.1073 of the Rules,14 the responsible party must warrant that each unit of equipment marketed under a DOC is identical to the unit tested and found acceptable with
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-1436A1.html
  • from James Ho, OvisLink Technologies, Corp. to Jackie Ellington, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission (December 2, 2005). Id. A Declaration of Conformity is a procedure where the responsible party, as defined in 47 C.F.R. S 2.909, makes measurements or takes other necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. 47 C.F.R. S 2.906. 47 C.F.R. S 15.3(o) defines an intentional radiator as "A device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy by radiation or induction." Certification is an equipment authorization issued by the Commission, based on representations and test data submitted by the applicant. 47 C.F.R. S 2.907(a). 47 C.F.R. S 2.803(e)(4) defines marketing as the "sale or lease, or offering for sale or
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-2497A1.html
  • Bureau 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. S 2.803(a)(2). See Letter from Ray LaForge, Chief, Audits and Compliance Branch, Office of Engineering and Technology, dated November 29, 2005. A Declaration of Conformity is a procedure where the responsible party makes measurements or takes other necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. 47 C.F.R. S 2.906(a). Under the Declaration of Conformity procedure, the measurements must be made by an FCC-accredited laboratory. 47 C.F.R. S 2.948(a)(3). In addition, a copy of the Declaration of Conformity listing the party responsible for compliance must be included in the literature supplied with the product. 47 C.F.R. S 2.1077. Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-13A1.html
  • Telecommunications Certification Bodies, based on representations and test data submitted by the applicant. 47 C.F.R. 2.907(a). A Declaration of Conformity is a procedure where the responsible party - the manufacturer, or in the case of imported equipment, the importer - makes measurements or takes other necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. 47 C.F.R. 2.906(a). Under the Declaration of Conformity procedure, the measurements must be made by an FCC- accredited laboratory. 47 C.F.R. 2.948(a)(3). In addition, a copy of the Declaration of Conformity listing the party responsible for compliance must be included in the literature supplied with the product. 47 C.F.R. 2.1077. Verification is also a procedure where the manufacturer, or in the case of
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-30A1.html
  • in that proceeding expressed concern that GPS re-radiator devices could interfere with accurate E911 location reporting. Id. at note 4. A DOC is a procedure where the responsible party - the manufacturer, or in the case of imported equipment, the importer - has measurements taken to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. See 47 C.F.R. S 2.906(a). Under the DOC procedure, the measurements must be made by an FCC-accredited laboratory. See 47 C.F.R. S 2.948(a)(3). In addition, a copy of the DOC listing the party responsible for compliance must be included in the literature supplied with the product. See 47 C.F.R. S 2.1077. The DOC procedure may be used only for certain types of unintentional radiators. See
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-321A1.html
  • Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to DreamBox USA (April 19, 2006). Letter from Carl W. Struckmeyer to Brian Butler, Assistant Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission (May 13, 2006). See Sections 2.907, 2.911 and 2.913 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. SS 2.907, 2.911, and 2.913. See Sections 2.906, 2.909 and 2.1071 through 2.1077 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R.SS 2.906, 2.909, and 2.1071 through 2.1077. Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to One-O-One iSolutions, Inc. (October 2, 2006). Letter from Christoph Goeltner, to Gabriel Collazo, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission (November 5, 2006). See Section 1.80(b)(3) of
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-45A1.html
  • Bodies, based on representations and test data submitted by the applicant. 47 C.F.R. S 2.907(a). A Declaration of Conformity is a procedure where the responsible party - the manufacturer, or in the case of imported equipment, the importer - makes measurements or takes other necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. 47 C.F.R. S 2.906(a). Under the Declaration of Conformity procedure, the measurements must be made by an FCC-accredited laboratory. 47 C.F.R. S 2.948(a)(3). In addition, a copy of the Declaration of Conformity listing the party responsible for compliance must be included in the literature supplied with the product. 47 C.F.R. S 2.1077. Verification is also a procedure where the manufacturer, or in the case
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-1897A1.html
  • 15.31(j), 15.107(a). 47 U. S. C. S:154(i) 47 C.F.R. S:S: 0.111, 0.311 47 U. S. C. S: 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803(a), 15.19, 15.31(j), 15.107(a). A "Declaration of Conformity is a procedure where the responsible party . . . makes measurements or takes other necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards." 47 C.F.R. S: 2.906. Federal Communications Commission DA 10- 1897 2 Federal Communications Commission DA 10- 1897 Federal Communications Commission DA 10-1897 3 References 1. http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1897A1.pdf 2. http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1897A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-754A1.html
  • which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction." 47 C.F.R. S: 15.3(z). Section 15.3(i) of the Rules defines "Class B digital device" as "a digital device that is marketed for use in a residential environment notwithstanding use in commercial, business and industrial environments." 47 C.F.R. S: 15.3(i). See 47 C.F.R. S: 2.902. See 47 C.F.R. S: 2.906. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.107. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.109. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.19. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.105. 47 C.F.R. S: 2.1203; see also 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.1204, 2.1205. See LOI, supra note 3. See Letter from Clifford M. Harrington and Tony Lin, Counsel for PreSonus Audio Electronics, Inc. to Nissa Laughner, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission (September 10,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2000/fcc00171.doc
  • are mindful, however, of commenters' concerns that governmental presence is necessary to supply the force of law behind the technical criteria governing CPE manufacture and connection to the wireline telephone network without harm. Record at 20, 24, 26, and 113. MRA Order at 24687 - 24688. Record at 283, 284. Record at 203, 204, 221, 206-211, 251. 47 C.F.R. �� 2.906, 2.948. As TIA has pointed out, the similarly named "Supplier's Declaration of Conformity" process established in ISO/IEC Guide 2:1996 does not require accreditation. TIA Ex Parte, Supplemental Comments, filed July 29, 1999, at 18, 19. TIA Comments, filed July 29, 1999, at 3, 7, 8. Id. at 8. 47 C.F.R. � 2.902. ITI Comments, filed August 6, 1999, at 3,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00400.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00400.txt
  • at 10540, para. 38. TIA Comments at 14. Notice, 15 FCC Rcd at 10548, para. 64. 47 C.F.R. � 68.102. MRA Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 24708, para. 48. Notice, 15 FCC Rcd at 10547, para. 63. 47 U.S.C. � 161. Notice, 15 FCC Rcd at 10548, para. 64. Id., 15 FCC Rcd at 10548, para. 64. 47 C.F.R. � 2.906. Notice, 15 FCC Rcd at 10548, para. 64. 47 C.F.R. � 2.902(a). 47 C.F.R. � 68.3(b)(3). MRA Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 24691, 24707, paras. 10, 45. Notice, 15 FCC Rcd at 10548, para. 64. Id., 15 FCC Rcd at 10551-552, para. 74-75. See 47 U.S.C. � 151. See supra n.22. See Part 68 First Report and Order, 56 FCC
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Compliance/Orders/1997/fcc97218.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Compliance/Orders/1997/fcc97218.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Compliance/Orders/1997/fcc97218.txt
  • Service is licensed. See Rand McNally 1992 Commercial Atlas and Marketing Guide, 123rd Edition, pp. 36-39. 13 C.F.R. ( 120.121, SIC Code 4812. 47 C.F.R. (( 2.905, 2.1001. 13 C.F.R. ( 121.201, SIC Code 4812. 13 C.F.R. ( 121.201, SIC Code 4812. 47 C.F.R. ( 2.904. 13 C.F.R. ( 121.201, SIC Code 4812. 47 C.F.R. ( 2.902. 47 C.F.R. ( 2.906. See also Amendment of Parts 2 and 15 of the Commission's Rules to Deregulate the Equipment Authorization Requirements for Digital Devices in ET Docket No. 95-19, released May 14, 1996. 13 C.F.R. ( 121.201, SIC Code 4812. Federal Communications Commission. CCB industry Analysis Division, Telecommunication Industry Revenue: TRS Worksheet Data, Tbl. 1 (Average Total Telecommunication Revenue Reported by Class of
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-3189A1.html
  • authorized prior to marketing in accordance with DOC or certification procedures. VIA asserts in its response to our LOI that it authorized its model EPIA-M and EPIA-CL CPU boards in accordance with the DOC procedures. However, VIA admits that it only tested these CPU boards for compliance with the Part 15 emission limits with the SSC function enabled. Under Section 2.906(b) of the Rules,12 a DOC attaches only to items subsequently marketed by the responsible party which are identical13 to the sample tested and found acceptable by the responsible party. Furthermore, under Section 2.1073 of the Rules,14 the responsible party must warrant that each unit of equipment marketed under a DOC is identical to the unit tested and found acceptable with
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-1436A1.html
  • from James Ho, OvisLink Technologies, Corp. to Jackie Ellington, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission (December 2, 2005). Id. A Declaration of Conformity is a procedure where the responsible party, as defined in 47 C.F.R. S 2.909, makes measurements or takes other necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. 47 C.F.R. S 2.906. 47 C.F.R. S 15.3(o) defines an intentional radiator as "A device that intentionally generates radio frequency energy by radiation or induction." Certification is an equipment authorization issued by the Commission, based on representations and test data submitted by the applicant. 47 C.F.R. S 2.907(a). 47 C.F.R. S 2.803(e)(4) defines marketing as the "sale or lease, or offering for sale or
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-2497A1.html
  • Bureau 47 U.S.C. S 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. S 2.803(a)(2). See Letter from Ray LaForge, Chief, Audits and Compliance Branch, Office of Engineering and Technology, dated November 29, 2005. A Declaration of Conformity is a procedure where the responsible party makes measurements or takes other necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. 47 C.F.R. S 2.906(a). Under the Declaration of Conformity procedure, the measurements must be made by an FCC-accredited laboratory. 47 C.F.R. S 2.948(a)(3). In addition, a copy of the Declaration of Conformity listing the party responsible for compliance must be included in the literature supplied with the product. 47 C.F.R. S 2.1077. Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-13A1.html
  • Telecommunications Certification Bodies, based on representations and test data submitted by the applicant. 47 C.F.R. 2.907(a). A Declaration of Conformity is a procedure where the responsible party - the manufacturer, or in the case of imported equipment, the importer - makes measurements or takes other necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. 47 C.F.R. 2.906(a). Under the Declaration of Conformity procedure, the measurements must be made by an FCC- accredited laboratory. 47 C.F.R. 2.948(a)(3). In addition, a copy of the Declaration of Conformity listing the party responsible for compliance must be included in the literature supplied with the product. 47 C.F.R. 2.1077. Verification is also a procedure where the manufacturer, or in the case of
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-30A1.html
  • in that proceeding expressed concern that GPS re-radiator devices could interfere with accurate E911 location reporting. Id. at note 4. A DOC is a procedure where the responsible party - the manufacturer, or in the case of imported equipment, the importer - has measurements taken to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. See 47 C.F.R. S 2.906(a). Under the DOC procedure, the measurements must be made by an FCC-accredited laboratory. See 47 C.F.R. S 2.948(a)(3). In addition, a copy of the DOC listing the party responsible for compliance must be included in the literature supplied with the product. See 47 C.F.R. S 2.1077. The DOC procedure may be used only for certain types of unintentional radiators. See
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-321A1.html
  • Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to DreamBox USA (April 19, 2006). Letter from Carl W. Struckmeyer to Brian Butler, Assistant Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission (May 13, 2006). See Sections 2.907, 2.911 and 2.913 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. SS 2.907, 2.911, and 2.913. See Sections 2.906, 2.909 and 2.1071 through 2.1077 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R.SS 2.906, 2.909, and 2.1071 through 2.1077. Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to One-O-One iSolutions, Inc. (October 2, 2006). Letter from Christoph Goeltner, to Gabriel Collazo, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission (November 5, 2006). See Section 1.80(b)(3) of
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/FCC-07-45A1.html
  • Bodies, based on representations and test data submitted by the applicant. 47 C.F.R. S 2.907(a). A Declaration of Conformity is a procedure where the responsible party - the manufacturer, or in the case of imported equipment, the importer - makes measurements or takes other necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards. 47 C.F.R. S 2.906(a). Under the Declaration of Conformity procedure, the measurements must be made by an FCC-accredited laboratory. 47 C.F.R. S 2.948(a)(3). In addition, a copy of the Declaration of Conformity listing the party responsible for compliance must be included in the literature supplied with the product. 47 C.F.R. S 2.1077. Verification is also a procedure where the manufacturer, or in the case
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-1897A1.html
  • 15.31(j), 15.107(a). 47 U. S. C. S:154(i) 47 C.F.R. S:S: 0.111, 0.311 47 U. S. C. S: 302a(b). 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.803(a), 15.19, 15.31(j), 15.107(a). A "Declaration of Conformity is a procedure where the responsible party . . . makes measurements or takes other necessary steps to ensure that the equipment complies with the appropriate technical standards." 47 C.F.R. S: 2.906. Federal Communications Commission DA 10- 1897 2 Federal Communications Commission DA 10- 1897 Federal Communications Commission DA 10-1897 3 References 1. http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1897A1.pdf 2. http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1897A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-754A1.html
  • which is not intended to emit RF energy by radiation or induction." 47 C.F.R. S: 15.3(z). Section 15.3(i) of the Rules defines "Class B digital device" as "a digital device that is marketed for use in a residential environment notwithstanding use in commercial, business and industrial environments." 47 C.F.R. S: 15.3(i). See 47 C.F.R. S: 2.902. See 47 C.F.R. S: 2.906. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.107. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.109. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.19. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.105. 47 C.F.R. S: 2.1203; see also 47 C.F.R. S:S: 2.1204, 2.1205. See LOI, supra note 3. See Letter from Clifford M. Harrington and Tony Lin, Counsel for PreSonus Audio Electronics, Inc. to Nissa Laughner, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission (September 10,