FCC Web Documents citing 2.947

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1784A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1784A1.pdf
  • See Letter from Eric Oh-Yang, Chairman & Chief Executive Officer, AboCom Systems, Inc., to Brett Greenwalt, Engineer, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission (April 10, 2006) (``LOI Response''). The devices manufactured for Hawking were designated as Hawking model HWR54G and the devices manufactured for Phoebe were designated as Phoebe model AR315W. LOI Response, Exhibit B. 47 C.F.R. § 2.947(b) and (c). AboCom Systems, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability, 21 FCC Rcd 7875 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div. 2006). AboCom asserts that if ``AboCom is able to resolve favorably to it [the question of whether AboCom's wireless access points are compliant] the Bureau will be immediately advised.'' Petition for Reconsideration at 1-2. Id. at 2. Id. Id. 47 U.S.C. §
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1134A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1134A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1134A1.txt
  • OET has reviewed the draft standard and determined that the technical criteria used to determine compatibility have not changed from the 2001 version of the standard. Further, OET finds that the various clarifications and improvements in the standard will advance the Commission's objective of ensuring hearing aid compatibility for digital wireless phones. Accordingly, consistent with 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.241(b) and 2.947(a), OET will accept applications for certification of equipment tested and rated under the revised draft standard ``American National Standard for Methods of Measurement of Compatibility between Wireless Communication Devices and Hearing Aids, ANSI C63.19-2005'' for all wireless phone hearing aid compatibility testing and rating, as specified in Section 20.19 of the rules, effective immediately. Applicants for certification may rely on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1215A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1215A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1215A1.txt
  • with the Office of Engineering and Technology (OET), the authority to approve future versions of the hearing aid compatibility standard. WTB and OET have reviewed the standard and determined that the various clarifications and improvements in the standard will advance the Commission's objective of ensuring hearing aid compatibility for digital wireless phones. Accordingly, consistent with 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.241(b) and 2.947(a), OET will accept applications for certification of equipment tested and rated under the revised standard ``American National Standard for Methods of Measurement of Compatibility between Wireless Communication Devices and Hearing Aids, ANSI C63.19-2006'' for all wireless phone hearing aid compatibility testing and rating, as specified in Section 20.19 of the rules, effective immediately. Applicants for certification may rely on only
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1442A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1442A1.txt
  • information.'' See Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to AboCom Systems, Inc. (March 2, 2006). See Letter from Eric Oh-Yang, Chairman & Chief Executive Officer, AboCom Systems, Inc., to Brett Greenwalt, Engineer, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission (April 10, 2006) (``LOI Response''). Id., Exhibit B. 47 C.F.R. § 2.947(b) and (c). 47 C.F.R. § 2.801 defines a radiofrequency device as ``any device which in it its operation is capable of emitting radiofrequency energy by radiation, conduction, or other means.'' See 47 C.F.R. § 2.931. Section 312(f)(1) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 312(f)(1), which applies to violations for which forfeitures are assessed under Section 503(b) of the Act, provides
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1784A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1784A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1784A1.txt
  • See Letter from Eric Oh-Yang, Chairman & Chief Executive Officer, AboCom Systems, Inc., to Brett Greenwalt, Engineer, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission (April 10, 2006) (``LOI Response''). The devices manufactured for Hawking were designated as Hawking model HWR54G and the devices manufactured for Phoebe were designated as Phoebe model AR315W. LOI Response, Exhibit B. 47 C.F.R. § 2.947(b) and (c). AboCom Systems, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability, 21 FCC Rcd 7875 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div. 2006). AboCom asserts that if ``AboCom is able to resolve favorably to it [the question of whether AboCom's wireless access points are compliant] the Bureau will be immediately advised.'' Petition for Reconsideration at 1-2. Id. at 2. Id. Id. 47 U.S.C. §
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-157A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-157A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-157A1.txt
  • The rules also specify measurement procedures to be applied generally for radiofrequency devices. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 154, 302a, 303, and 336. Section Number and Title: 2.917 Dismissal of application. 2.927 Limitations on grants. 2.937 Equipment defect and/or design change. 2.939 Revocation or withdrawal of equipment authorization. 2.941 Availability of information relating to grants. 2.945 Sampling tests of equipment compliance. 2.947 Measure procedure. 2.952 Limitation on verification. 2.953 Responsibility for compliance. 2.954 Identification. 2.955 Retention of records. 2.956 FCC inspection and submission of equipment for testing. PART 15 RADIO FREQUENCY DEVICES SUBPART C-INTENTIONAL RADIATORS Brief Description: The rule specifies radiated emission limits for intentional radiators for which no other requirements identified in this part. Need: The limits specified in this section
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2478A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2478A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2478A1.txt
  • C63.4-2009 standard as well as the new ANSI C63.10-2009 standard and determined that the various clarifications and improvements in these standards will advance the Commission's objective of ensuring compliance with its technical requirements as well as decreasing the burden on equipment manufacturers, thus allowing for the timely introduction of innovative new products. Accordingly, consistent with 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.241(b) and 2.947, OET will accept applications for certification of equipment tested either to the ANSI C63.4-2003 procedures or the revised ANSI C63.4-2009 and new ANSI C63.10-2009 procedures. In the case of unintentional radiators that are subject to 15.31(a)(3), measurements to determine compliance may be made using either the 2003 or the 2009 version of the ANSI C63.4 standard, and parties must identify
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1707A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1707A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1707A1.txt
  • Engineering and Technology Clarify Use of Revised Wireless Phone Hearing Aid Compatibility Standard, Public Notice, 21 FCC Rcd 6384, 6385 (2006) (``Applicants for certification may rely on only one version of the ANSI C63.19 standard, 2001, 2005 or 2006, and must identify which version they are using for compatibility testing and for rating wireless phones, consistent with 47 C.F.R. § 2.947(b).''); Amendment of the Commission's Rules Governing Hearing Aid-Compatible Mobile Handsets, WT Docket No. 07-250, First Report and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 3406, 3439 ¶ 82 (2008) (``[A] party can use either the 2006 or 2007 standard for new certifications through 2009, but must use a single version for all certification tests and criteria for both the M and T ratings
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-550A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-550A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-550A1.txt
  • Engineering and Technology Clarify Use of Revised Wireless Phone Hearing Aid Compatibility Standard, Public Notice, 21 FCC Rcd 6384, 6385 (2006) (``Applicants for certification may rely on only one version of the ANSI C63.19 standard, 2001, 2005 or 2006, and must identify which version they are using for compatibility testing and for rating wireless phones, consistent with 47 C.F.R. § 2.947(b).''); Amendment of the Commission's Rules Governing Hearing Aid-Compatible Mobile Handsets, WT Docket No. 07-250, First Report and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 3406, 3439 ¶ 82 (2008) (``[A] party can use either the 2006 or 2007 standard for new certifications through 2009, but must use a single version for all certification tests and criteria for both the M and T ratings
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-550A1_Rcd.pdf
  • Engineering and Technology Clarify Use of Revised Wireless Phone Hearing Aid Compatibility Standard, Public Notice, 21 FCC Rcd 6384, 6385 (2006) ("Applicants for certification may rely on only one version of the ANSI C63.19 standard, 2001, 2005 or 2006, and must identify which version they are using for compatibility testing and for rating wireless phones, consistent with 47 C.F.R. § 2.947(b)."); Amendment of the Commission's Rules Governing Hearing Aid-Compatible Mobile Handsets, WT Docket No. 07-250, First Report and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 3406, 3439 ¶ 82 (2008) ("[A] party can use either the 2006 or 2007 standard for new certifications through 2009, but must use a single version for all certification tests and criteria for both the M and T ratings
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-96A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-96A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-96A1.txt
  • 5 GHz Coalition reply comments at 3-6. Some of the substantive changes include making the channel availability check a minimum value rather than an absolute value, expanding testing to include every channel bandwidth the device is capable of, and adding additional text to provide for alternate test procedures. See Compliance Measurement Procedures in the Appendix. See also 47 C.F.R. § 2.947 (describing the different standards or measurement procedures that the Commission will accept). In the Report and Order, the Commission codified some of the terms and definitions from the interim measurement procedure (47 C.F.R. § 15.403), primarily those were used in the U-NII general technical requirements rule (47 C.F.R. § 15.407). See Appendix A: Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis of the Report
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-260A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-260A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-260A1.txt
  • the appropriate procedures. We plan to develop these measurement procedures as expeditiously as possible. Consistent with the Commission's actions in the U-NII proceeding, our Office of Engineering and Technology will release the procedure for unlicensed TV band devices when it is completed and the Commission will accept data that has been measured in accordance with that procedure pursuant to Section 2.947(a) of the rules. Spectrum Sharing In the First R&O/Further Notice, the Commission stated that it anticipates that industry will develop protocol standards that facilitate shared use of the TV white space spectrum. It expressed concern, however, that in the absence of some minimal mandatory requirements, a single device or network of devices could conceivably monopolize use of a channel at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-128A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-128A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-128A1.txt
  • former MICS rule which specified a peak detector function as one measurement technique for demonstrating compliance with transmitter power limits. In substitution for the obsolete ANSI standard of the former MICS rule, we are also adding a provision that expands the available options for demonstrating compliance by stating that measurement procedures found acceptable to the Commission in accordance with Section 2.947 may also be used. In addition, the Office of Engineering and Technology (OET) Laboratory Division has published information in its Knowledge Data Base (KDB) concerning acceptable average power measurement procedures under this provision. We believe that this approach satisfies the substance of Medtronic's request that the MedRadio rules be modified to permit the average power instrumentation techniques formerly acceptable under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-151A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-151A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-151A1.txt
  • the SIA Petition for Reconsideration at p. 5. See Second MO&O, supra, at paras. 95-99. Id. at para. 99. See Second MO&O, supra, at para. 99. See 47 C.F.R. § 15.5(c). See 47 C.F.R. § 15.503(d). See also First R&O, supra, at para. 32. See First R&O, supra, at para. 32. See 47 C.F.R. § 15.31(c). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.947(a)(3) and 15.521(d). While the Commission indicated in the First R&O that it would be unlikely that devices using stepped frequency, frequency hopping or swept frequency modulation formats would comply with the fractional bandwidth or minimum bandwidth requirements for UWB devices, such systems were eventually developed. See First R&O, supra, at para. 32. The rules also permit UWB vehicular radar systems
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-176A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-176A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-176A1.txt
  • with the maximum transmitter power requirements set forth in §95.639(f) shall be based on measurements using a peak detector function and measured over an interval of time when transmission is continuous and at its maximum power level. In lieu of using a peak detector function, measurement procedures that have been found to be acceptable to the Commission in accordance with §2.947 of this chapter may be used to demonstrate compliance. (A) For a transmitter intended to be implanted in a human body, radiated emissions and EIRP measurements for transmissions by stations authorized under this section may be made in accordance with a Commission-approved human body simulator and test technique. A formula for a suitable tissue substitute material is defined in OET
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-34A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-34A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-34A1.txt
  • 139 at p. 3. The side lobes are smaller beams that are away from the main beam. These side lobes are usually radiation in undesired directions which can never be completely eliminated. The side lobe level (or side lobe ratio) is an important parameter used to characterize antenna radiation patterns. ECC Report 139 at p. 2. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.947. TCBs are accredited third-party product certification bodies authorized to issue a grant of certification for certain products in lieu of a traditional grant issued by the Commission. Notice and Order, 25 FCC Rcd. 601, 610 (2010) at para. 24. See also, 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.1031-2.1060. . Krohne TLPR operation inside steel tanks in this band is pursuant to a waiver
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-54A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-54A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-54A1.txt
  • with the maximum transmitter power requirements set forth in §95.639(f) shall be based on measurements using a peak detector function and measured over an interval of time when transmission is continuous and at its maximum power level. In lieu of using a peak detector function, measurement procedures that have been found to be acceptable to the Commission in accordance with §2.947 of this chapter may be used to demonstrate compliance. For a transmitter intended to be implanted in a human body, radiated emissions and EIRP measurements for transmissions by stations authorized under this section may be made in accordance with a Commission-approved human body simulator and test technique. A formula for a suitable tissue substitute material is defined in OET Bulletin
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-1442A1.html
  • information." See Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to AboCom Systems, Inc. (March 2, 2006). See Letter from Eric Oh-Yang, Chairman & Chief Executive Officer, AboCom Systems, Inc., to Brett Greenwalt, Engineer, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission (April 10, 2006) ("LOI Response"). Id., Exhibit B. 47 C.F.R. S 2.947(b) and (c). 47 C.F.R. S 2.801 defines a radiofrequency device as "any device which in it its operation is capable of emitting radiofrequency energy by radiation, conduction, or other means." See 47 C.F.R. S 2.931. Section 312(f)(1) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 312(f)(1), which applies to violations for which forfeitures are assessed under Section 503(b) of the Act, provides
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1784A1.html
  • See Letter from Eric Oh-Yang, Chairman & Chief Executive Officer, AboCom Systems, Inc., to Brett Greenwalt, Engineer, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission (April 10, 2006) ("LOI Response"). The devices manufactured for Hawking were designated as Hawking model HWR54G and the devices manufactured for Phoebe were designated as Phoebe model AR315W. LOI Response, Exhibit B. 47 C.F.R. S 2.947(b) and (c). AboCom Systems, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability, 21 FCC Rcd 7875 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div. 2006). AboCom asserts that if "AboCom is able to resolve favorably to it [the question of whether AboCom's wireless access points are compliant] the Bureau will be immediately advised." Petition for Reconsideration at 1-2. Id. at 2. Id. Id. 47 U.S.C. S
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/DA-06-1442A1.html
  • information." See Letter from Kathryn S. Berthot, Deputy Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission to AboCom Systems, Inc. (March 2, 2006). See Letter from Eric Oh-Yang, Chairman & Chief Executive Officer, AboCom Systems, Inc., to Brett Greenwalt, Engineer, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission (April 10, 2006) ("LOI Response"). Id., Exhibit B. 47 C.F.R. S 2.947(b) and (c). 47 C.F.R. S 2.801 defines a radiofrequency device as "any device which in it its operation is capable of emitting radiofrequency energy by radiation, conduction, or other means." See 47 C.F.R. S 2.931. Section 312(f)(1) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 312(f)(1), which applies to violations for which forfeitures are assessed under Section 503(b) of the Act, provides
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1784A1.html
  • See Letter from Eric Oh-Yang, Chairman & Chief Executive Officer, AboCom Systems, Inc., to Brett Greenwalt, Engineer, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission (April 10, 2006) ("LOI Response"). The devices manufactured for Hawking were designated as Hawking model HWR54G and the devices manufactured for Phoebe were designated as Phoebe model AR315W. LOI Response, Exhibit B. 47 C.F.R. S 2.947(b) and (c). AboCom Systems, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability, 21 FCC Rcd 7875 (Enf. Bur., Spectrum Enf. Div. 2006). AboCom asserts that if "AboCom is able to resolve favorably to it [the question of whether AboCom's wireless access points are compliant] the Bureau will be immediately advised." Petition for Reconsideration at 1-2. Id. at 2. Id. Id. 47 U.S.C. S