FCC Web Documents citing 3.27

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-952A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-952A1.pdf
  • reconsideration] in favor of the requested modification and waiver, if and as appropriate.'' Arlington now submits that ``testing of antenna systems of the type the County would like to employ has demonstrated much wider coverage at ten watts than first anticipated. The chosen antenna configuration will potentially extend the range of the 2 mV/m contour to a distance of approximately 3.27 kilometers (km) from the transmitter site.'' Accordingly, Arlington now seeks a waiver of Section 90.242(b)(4)(iv) only to extend the coverage contour of Fire Station #2, currently licensed under Call Sign WQCR563, beyond the prescribed boundary of 1.5 km (0.93 miles) from the transmitting antenna. Arlington states that it is one of the most densely populated jurisdictions in the country, with
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1312A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1312A1.pdf
  • to commercial AM or TIS stations.'' Section 90.242(b)(4)(iv) specifies that that the field strength of TIS stations shall not exceed 2 m/Vm when measured with a standard field strength meter at a distance of 1.50 kilometers (0.93 miles) from the transmitting antenna system. Because Howard County's testing indicates that the 2 mV/m contour will extend to a distance of approximately 3.27 kilometers from each transmitter site, it acknowledges that waiver of this rule is required. In support of its request for waiver, Howard County asserts that the purpose of Section 90.242(b)(4)(iv) would not be served or would be frustrated by application to the instant case. Specifically, Howard County states that, while ``TIS stations were not meant to duplicate commercial offerings, ...
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-87A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-87A5.txt
  • n/a n/a 2.41 Ireland n/a 2.44 1.05 n/a 4.60 1.68 n/a 5.75 2.37 Luxembourg n/a 2.23 2.36 n/a 2.23 2.36 n/a 2.23 2.36 Netherlands 2.20 1.30 1.05 2.20 1.78 1.48 2.77 2.29 1.78 Portugal n/a 1.33 1.04 n/a 2.63 1.71 n/a 19.97 2.71 Spain 1.66 1.65 1.04 1.66 1.65 1.67 4.63 4.63 3.22 Sweden 1.84 1.26 0.90 2.36 1.96 1.22 3.27 2.67 1.67 U.K. 0.70 0.68 0.65 1.00 0.97 0.94 1.91 1.88 1.33 Notes: September 1997, $/ECU = 1.0981 May 1998, $/ECU = 1.1096 September 1999, $/EURO = 1.0497 Source: Interconnection Rates: 1997, 1998 from Porte-Parole, Falling Cost of Fixed Networked Telecommunications in Europe, July 1998, 1999 from The European Commission, Fifth Report on the Implementation of the Telecommunications Regulatory Package,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1589A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1589A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1589A2.txt
  • given experimental session. These regressions were run to determine whether sellers varied in their ability to operate profitably in the various concentration treatments. Observations = 24 F(3, 20) = 2.38 Prob > F = 0.1000 R2 = .2631 Root MSE = 50.43 Seller #1 Net Surplus Coefficient (t-value) (95% Confidence. Interval) Low/High -27.37 (1.09) -79.97 25.22 High/High -55.87 (-2.22) -108.47 -3.27 Period -13.75 (-1.49) -32.95 5.45 Constant 49.5 (.79) -80.77 179.77 Table 18: Seller #1 Net Surplus Regression (CAP MFN Treatment) Observations = 24 F(3, 20) = 1.90 Prob > F = 0.1622 R2 = .3054 Root MSE = 19.382 Seller #2 Net Surplus Coefficient (t-value) (95% Confidence. Interval) Low/High -28.125 (-1.63) -64.14 7.89 High/High -36.75 (-2.13) -72.76 -.7315 Period 3.41
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • (0.06) 0.0032 138 CPP, Evening 0.41 (0.01) -0.64 (1.20) 45.03 (0.54) 11.58 (0.53) -0.0002 (-0.07) 0.0080 138 CPP, Average -8.77 (0.28) -0.56 (0.99) 1.34 (0.01) 13.27 (0.56) 0.0004 (0.13) -0.0023 138 CPM, AM Drive 3.79 (0.45) -0.57*(3.74) 11.21 (0.47) -2.98 (-0.47) -0.0003 (-0.40) 0.2400 138 CPM, Evening 2.60 (0.25) -0.66*(3.50) 30.12 (1.01) -0.53 (-0.07) 0.0002 (0.17) 0.2688 138 CPM, Average 3.27 (0.39) -0.58*(3.79) 15.82 (0.66) -1.07 (-0.17) 0.0000 (0.03) 0.2544 138 With Demographics: CPP, AM Drive 6.26 (0.39) -0.64*(2.01) -0.73 (-0.02) -17.13 (-1.41) 0.0001 (0.05) 0.7997 133 CPP, Evening 6.16 (0.35) -0.37 (1.08) 6.31 (0.12) -5.54 (-0.42) -0.0002 (-0.11) 0.6959 133 CPP, Average 4.69 (0.32) -0.44 (1.49) 0.30 (0.01) -10.95 (-0.99) 0.0005 (0.30) 0.8153 133 CPM, AM Drive 0.87 (0.11) -0.38*(2.46)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-952A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-952A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-952A1.txt
  • reconsideration] in favor of the requested modification and waiver, if and as appropriate.'' Arlington now submits that ``testing of antenna systems of the type the County would like to employ has demonstrated much wider coverage at ten watts than first anticipated. The chosen antenna configuration will potentially extend the range of the 2 mV/m contour to a distance of approximately 3.27 kilometers (km) from the transmitter site.'' Accordingly, Arlington now seeks a waiver of Section 90.242(b)(4)(iv) only to extend the coverage contour of Fire Station #2, currently licensed under Call Sign WQCR563, beyond the prescribed boundary of 1.5 km (0.93 miles) from the transmitting antenna. Arlington states that it is one of the most densely populated jurisdictions in the country, with
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1312A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1312A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1312A1.txt
  • to commercial AM or TIS stations.'' Section 90.242(b)(4)(iv) specifies that that the field strength of TIS stations shall not exceed 2 m/Vm when measured with a standard field strength meter at a distance of 1.50 kilometers (0.93 miles) from the transmitting antenna system. Because Howard County's testing indicates that the 2 mV/m contour will extend to a distance of approximately 3.27 kilometers from each transmitter site, it acknowledges that waiver of this rule is required. In support of its request for waiver, Howard County asserts that the purpose of Section 90.242(b)(4)(iv) would not be served or would be frustrated by application to the instant case. Specifically, Howard County states that, while ``TIS stations were not meant to duplicate commercial offerings, ...
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2577A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2577A1.txt
  • turn, is wholly owned by SIBHL, which is also organized under the laws of Antigua and Barbuda. SIBHL is wholly owned and controlled by R. Allen Stanford, a U.S. citizen (who also holds citizenship of Antigua and Barbuda). The Petition indicates that Michael Ah Koy, individually and as a beneficiary and trustee of the James Michael Ah Koy Trust, holds 3.27 percent of eLandia. Mr. Ah Koy is a citizen of Fiji, a WTO Member country. In addition, W&R South Pacific, L.P. (WSPLP), a U.S. limited partnership, holds a 3.57 percent ownership interest in eLandia. WSPLP is owned and controlled by Barry and Fay Alailima Rose, U.S. citizens, through W&R, Inc., a U.S. corporation. The remaining 25.06 percent ownership interests in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.txt
  • analysis. Accordingly we will turn to an analysis of the changes in revenues resulting from changes in the presence of LPFM stations. Table 9 Average Full-Service Commercial FM Stations' Revenue per Adult by Market Year No LPFM One LPFM Two or More LPFM Market Rank 1 - 100 Market Measure 2005 3.47 3.66 3.03 * (663) (378) (580) 2007 3.45 3.27 3.17 (447) (381) (783) 2009 2.50 2.42 2.22 * (473) (344) (825) Contour Measure 2005 2.69 3.38 * 4.38 * (737) (407) (477) 2007 2.45 3.22 * 4.10 * (595) (396) (620) 2009 1.81 2.23 * 2.87 * (605) (349) (688) Market Rank 101 - 200 Market Measure 2005 5.73 4.18 * 3.78 * (371) (308) (406) 2007 5.57 4.67
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • 0.72 % Second Quarter 3.14 0.76 3.90 0.00 0.76 0.76 Third Quarter 3.14 0.75 3.89 0.00 0.75 0.75 Fourth Quarter 3.18 0.75 3.93 0.00 0.75 0.75 1999First Quarter 3.18 0.58 3.76 0.00 0.58 0.58 Second Quarter 3.05 0.57 3.62 0.00 0.57 0.57 Third Quarter 2.94 0.99 3.93 0.00 0.99 0.99 Fourth Quarter 2.89 1.10 3.99 0.00 1.10 1.10 2000First Quarter 3.27 2.61 5.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 Second Quarter 3.21 2.50 5.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 Third Quarter 3.77 1.77 5.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fourth Quarter 3.88 1.79 5.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 2001First Quarter 4.07 2.61 6.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 Second Quarter 4.18 2.70 6.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 Third Quarter 4.15 2.74 6.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 Source: Quarterly public notices on universal service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.txt
  • Israel 2.28 2.16 2.16 1.90 1.18 0.70 0.59 Italy 1.65 1.51 1.22 0.71 0.52 0.33 Jamaica 1.55 1.50 1.40 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.25 1.05 0.60 Japan 1.31 1.04 0.94 0.94 0.91 0.86 Korea, Rep. 1.60 1.44 1.41 1.26 1.23 0.98 0.85 0.71 0.51 Mexico 19/ 0.72 0.68 0.58 0.53 0.485 0.395 0.37 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 Morocco 3.03 3.04 3.27 1.78 1.45 1.09 0.83 0.82 0.77 0.38 Netherlands 0.69 0.69 0.59 0.37 0.36 0.27 Nigeria 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.40 1.15 0.77 0.51 Pakistan 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.20 2.00 1.20 1.20 0.84 0.54 0.42 0.42 Peru 1.50 1.40 1.30 1.30 1.23 1.00 0.85 0.66 0.50 0.38 Philippines 1.68 1.68 1.34 1.23 1.00 1.00 0.72 0.57 Poland 1.30
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.txt
  • 1.42 1.28 1.08 0.85 0.68 0.46 0.46 Israel 2.16 2.16 1.90 1.18 0.70 0.59 Italy 1.51 1.22 0.71 0.52 0.33 Jamaica 1.50 1.40 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.25 1.05 0.60 Japan 1.04 0.94 0.94 0.91 0.86 Korea, Rep. 1.44 1.41 1.26 1.23 0.98 0.85 0.71 0.51 Mexico 20/ 0.68 0.58 0.53 0.485 0.395 0.37 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 Morocco 3.04 3.27 1.78 1.45 1.09 0.83 0.82 0.77 0.38 Netherlands 0.69 0.59 0.37 0.36 0.27 Nigeria 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.40 1.15 0.77 0.51 Pakistan 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.20 2.00 1.20 1.20 0.84 0.54 0.42 0.42 Peru 1.40 1.30 1.30 1.23 1.00 0.85 0.66 0.50 0.38 Philippines 1.68 1.34 1.23 1.00 1.00 0.72 0.57 Poland 1.25 1.20 1.15 0.95 0.70 0.55
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • Table 1.21 Installation, Maintenance, and Customer Complaints ............................................ Table 9.1 Interstate Access Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 3.12 Interstate Access Support Payments by Study Area ........................................... Table 3.28 3 Index of Tables and Charts Interstate Common Line Support Payment Trueups by State or Jurisdiction ......... Table 3.11 Interstate Common Line Support Payment Trueups by Study Area .......................Table 3.27 Investment - Average Net ....................................................................................... Table 11.6 Investment - Gross .................................................................................................. Table 11.3 Investment - Other .................................................................................................. Table 11.13 Investment Reserves ............................................................................................... Table 11.4 Lifeline and Link Up Support Payments ........................................................ Chart 2.1 Lifeline Assistance - Payments - by State or Jurisdiction .......................................Table 2.8 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - by State ........................................................ Table 2.6 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - Tribal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A2.txt
  • Table 1.21 Installation, Maintenance, and Customer Complaints ............................................ Table 9.1 Interstate Access Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 3.12 Interstate Access Support Payments by Study Area ........................................... Table 3.28 3 Index of Tables and Charts Interstate Common Line Support Payment Trueups by State or Jurisdiction ......... Table 3.11 Interstate Common Line Support Payment Trueups by Study Area .......................Table 3.27 Investment - Average Net ....................................................................................... Table 11.6 Investment - Gross .................................................................................................. Table 11.3 Investment - Other .................................................................................................. Table 11.13 Investment Reserves ............................................................................................... Table 11.4 Lifeline and Link Up Support Payments ........................................................ Chart 2.1 Lifeline Assistance - Payments - by State or Jurisdiction .......................................Table 2.8 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - by State ........................................................ Table 2.6 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - Tribal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • any support, are included in the table. Table 3.24 has safety valve support payments. Only those study areas that are eligible for these payments, regardless of whether they receive any support, are included in the table. Table 3.25 provides, by non-rural study area, the high cost support using the forward-looking high-cost model support mechanism.42 Table 3.26 has LTS payments. Table 3.27 has ICLS payments. Table 3.28 has 40 These are the carriers that settle on a cost basis. Costs for the remaining ILECs, which settle on an average schedule basis, are attributed by NECA on the basis of those carriers' average number of loops per exchange. 41 The data submitted by NECA include payments that would have been made to non-rural
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • $793 $681 1995 698 782 796 700 1996 757 887 870 763 1997 791 945 833 807 1998 818 915 811 831 1999 837 934 872 847 2000 862 986 889 876 2001 899 1,024 917 914 2002 944 1,050 1,021 950 2003 946 1,027 968 954 2004 986 1,025 1,031 985 1980 1.85% 2.96% 1981 1.98 2.88 1982 1.97 3.27 1983 2.00 3.48 1984 1.89 3.16 1985 1.86 2.90 1986 1.89 2.95 1987 1.96 3.10 1988 1.99 3.22 1989 1.95 3.29 1990 1.99 3.26 1991 1.99 3.27 1992 1.99 3.29 1993 2.03 3.48 1994 2.07 3.37 3.00% 2.12% 1995 2.09 3.29 2.98 2.14 1996 2.16 3.56 3.12 2.22 1997 2.19 3.70 2.84 2.28 1998 2.22 3.55 2.70 2.31 1999 2.18
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • Table 1.21 Installation, Maintenance, and Customer Complaints ............................................ Table 9.1 3 Index of Tables and Charts Interstate Access Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 3.12 Interstate Access Support Payments by Study Area ........................................... Table 3.28 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by State or Jurisdiction ...... Table 3.11 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by Study Area ....................Table 3.27 Investment - Average Net ....................................................................................... Table 11.6 Investment - Gross .................................................................................................. Table 11.3 Investment - Other .................................................................................................. Table 11.13 Investment Reserves ............................................................................................... Table 11.4 Lifeline and Link Up Support Payments ........................................................ Chart 2.1 Lifeline Assistance - Payments - by State or Jurisdiction .......................................Table 2.8 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - by State ........................................................ Table 2.6 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - Tribal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A2.txt
  • Table 1.21 Installation, Maintenance, and Customer Complaints ............................................ Table 9.1 3 Index of Tables and Charts Interstate Access Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 3.12 Interstate Access Support Payments by Study Area ........................................... Table 3.28 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by State or Jurisdiction ...... Table 3.11 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by Study Area ....................Table 3.27 Investment - Average Net ....................................................................................... Table 11.6 Investment - Gross .................................................................................................. Table 11.3 Investment - Other .................................................................................................. Table 11.13 Investment Reserves ............................................................................................... Table 11.4 Lifeline and Link Up Support Payments ........................................................ Chart 2.1 Lifeline Assistance - Payments - by State or Jurisdiction .......................................Table 2.8 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - by State ........................................................ Table 2.6 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - Tribal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A3.txt
  • Montana 1,846,610 0.44 159 207 Nebraska 2,367,366 0.56 203 266 Nevada 5,939,816 1.41 510 666 New Hampshire 2,526,628 0.60 217 283 New Jersey 15,627,462 3.72 1,342 1,753 New Mexico 3,214,937 0.77 276 361 New York 23,303,950 5.55 2,001 2,615 North Carolina 13,503,157 3.21 1,160 1,515 North Dakota 973,429 0.23 84 109 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA Ohio 13,760,686 3.27 1,182 1,544 Oklahoma 5,232,871 1.25 449 587 Oregon 5,507,327 1.31 473 618 Pennsylvania 17,145,532 4.08 1,472 1,924 Puerto Rico 3,232,275 0.77 278 363 Rhode Island 1,321,925 0.31 114 148 South Carolina 6,667,116 1.59 573 748 South Dakota 1,082,229 0.26 93 121 Tennessee 8,158,156 1.94 701 915 Texas 25,858,875 6.15 2,220 2,901 Utah 3,075,292 0.73 264 345 Vermont 1,404,008 0.33 121
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • calculations. Consequently the amounts shown in Table 3.6 are a better indication of the actual HCLS payments. 3 - 11 payments. Table 3.23 has safety net additive support payments. Table 3.24 has safety valve support payments. Table 3.25 provides, by non-rural study area, the high cost support using the forward-looking high-cost model support mechanism.44 Table 3.26 has LTS payments. Table 3.27 has ICLS payments. Table 3.28 has IAS payments for price-cap companies. Table 3.29 has LSS payments. Table 3.30 has the total support payments for all seven programs. Each of these tables contains the annual amounts for only those years for which a support mechanism was in place. The 1998 amounts in Tables 3.22, 3.26, and 3.29 are the actual payments
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • Information for Allocating SLC Revenues ................................................. Table 1.21 Installation, Maintenance, and Customer Complaints ............................................ Table 9.1 Interstate Access Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 3.12 Interstate Access Support Payments by Study Area ........................................... Table 3.28 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by State or Jurisdiction ...... Table 3.11 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by Study Area ....................Table 3.27 Investment - Average Net ....................................................................................... Table 11.6 Investment - Gross .................................................................................................. Table 11.3 Investment - Other .................................................................................................. Table 11.13 Investment Reserves ............................................................................................... Table 11.4 Lifeline and Link Up Support Payments ........................................................ Chart 2.1 Lifeline Assistance - Payments - by State or Jurisdiction .......................................Table 2.8 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - by State ........................................................ Table 2.6 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - Tribal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.txt
  • 1,636 (3) (0.18) Verizon South - Illinois IL (153) (153) 0 0.00 Verizon North - Illinois IL 12,099 12,109 (11) (0.09) AT&T - Ameritech - Illinois Bell IL (160,144) (160,494) 350 (0.22) Verizon North - Contel/Indiana IN (2,542) (2,537) (5) 0.20 Verizon North - Indiana IN (615) (592) (24) 3.90 AT&T - Ameritech - Indiana Bell IN (9,735) (9,418) (318) 3.27 Embarq - United Telephone Company of Indiana IN (62) (43) (19) 30.65 Iowa Telecommunications Services - Iowa IA 100 79 21 21.00 Iowa Telecommunications Services - Iowa North IA 126 100 26 20.63 Iowa Telecommunications Services - Iowa System IA 75 58 17 22.67 Qwest - Iowa IA (6,568) (6,428) (140) 2.13 AT&T - Southwestern Bell - Kansas KS 1,419
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A2.txt
  • Information for Allocating SLC Revenues ................................................. Table 1.21 Installation, Maintenance, and Customer Complaints ............................................ Table 9.1 Interstate Access Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 3.12 Interstate Access Support Payments by Study Area ........................................... Table 3.28 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by State or Jurisdiction ...... Table 3.11 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by Study Area ....................Table 3.27 Investment - Average Net ....................................................................................... Table 11.6 Investment - Gross .................................................................................................. Table 11.3 Investment - Other .................................................................................................. Table 11.13 Investment Reserves ............................................................................................... Table 11.4 Lifeline and Link Up Support Payments ........................................................ Chart 2.1 Lifeline Assistance - Payments - by State or Jurisdiction .......................................Table 2.8 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - by State ........................................................ Table 2.6 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - Tribal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A3.txt
  • Alabama 6,207,659 1.56% $540 $729 Alaska NA NA NA NA American Samoa NA NA NA NA Arizona 7,641,971 1.92 664 897 Arkansas 4,051,568 1.02 352 476 California 39,174,961 9.82 3,406 4,600 Colorado 7,688,254 1.93 668 903 Connecticut 7,700,937 1.93 670 904 Delaware 1,625,899 0.41 141 191 District of Columbia 2,149,087 0.54 187 252 Florida 29,664,188 7.44 2,579 3,483 Georgia 13,027,789 3.27 1,133 1,530 Guam NA NA NA NA Hawaii 1,471,109 0.37 128 173 Idaho 2,360,787 0.59 205 277 Illinois 16,400,757 4.11 1,426 1,926 Indiana 8,053,522 2.02 700 946 Iowa 4,124,988 1.03 359 484 Kansas 3,796,088 0.95 330 446 Kentucky 5,078,948 1.27 442 596 Louisiana 5,339,272 1.34 464 627 Maine 1,989,405 0.50 173 234 Maryland 9,744,437 2.44 847 1,144 Massachusetts 8,884,613 2.23
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.txt
  • 10.00 8.89 4.74 13.50 12.32 Utah 8.10 8.25 8.12 0.00 3.50 3.49 0.00 1.75 1.75 8.10 10.00 9.87 8.10 13.50 13.37 Vermont 8.15 8.25 8.17 0.00 3.50 3.50 0.00 1.75 1.75 8.15 10.00 9.92 8.15 13.50 13.42 Virgin Islands N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Virginia 6.72 8.25 6.99 0.00 3.50 3.27 0.00 1.75 1.64 6.72 10.00 8.63 6.72 13.50 11.90 Washington 6.50 8.25 7.82 0.00 3.50 2.30 0.00 1.75 1.15 6.50 10.00 8.97 6.50 13.50 11.27 West Virginia 6.50 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 2.80 0.00 1.75 1.40 6.50 10.00 9.65 6.50 13.50 12.44 Wisconsin 6.82 8.25 7.28 0.00 3.50 1.23 0.00 1.75 0.62 6.82 10.00 7.90 6.82 13.50 9.13 Wyoming 8.15
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • table. Payments for 1998 through 2001 can be found in the 2006 Universal Service Monitoring Report. Table 3.22 has HCLS payments. Table 3.23 has safety net additive support payments. Table 3.24 has safety valve support payments. Table 3.25 provides, by non-rural study area, the high cost support using the forward-looking high-cost model support mechanism.47 Table 3.26 has LTS payments. Table 3.27 has ICLS payments. Table 3.28 has IAS payments for price-cap companies. Table 3.29 has LSS payments. Table 3.30 has the total support payments for all seven programs. Each of these tables contains the annual amounts for only those years for which a support mechanism was in place. Table 3.27 has the final ICLS true-ups for 2002 through on an average
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • 870 763 1997 791 945 833 807 1998 818 915 811 831 1999 837 934 872 847 2000 862 986 889 876 2001 899 1,024 917 914 2002 944 1,050 1,021 950 2003 946 1,027 968 954 2004 986 1,025 1,031 985 2005 1,032 1,124 1,032 1,038 2006 1,074 1,154 1,033 1,072 1980 1.85% 2.96% 1981 1.98 2.88 1982 1.97 3.27 1983 2.00 3.48 1984 1.89 3.16 1985 1.86 2.90 1986 1.89 2.95 1987 1.96 3.10 1988 1.99 3.22 1989 1.95 3.29 1990 1.99 3.26 1991 1.99 3.27 1992 1.99 3.29 1993 2.03 3.48 1994 2.07 3.37 3.00% 2.12% 1995 2.09 3.29 2.98 2.14 1996 2.16 3.56 3.12 2.22 1997 2.19 3.70 2.84 2.28 1998 2.22 3.55 2.70 2.31 1999 2.18
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • Information for Allocating SLC Revenues ................................................. Table 1.21 Installation, Maintenance, and Customer Complaints ............................................ Table 9.1 Interstate Access Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 3.12 Interstate Access Support Payments by Study Area ........................................... Table 3.28 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by State or Jurisdiction ...... Table 3.11 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by Study Area ....................Table 3.27 Investment - Average Net ....................................................................................... Table 11.6 Investment - Gross .................................................................................................. Table 11.3 Investment - Other .................................................................................................. Table 11.13 Investment Reserves ............................................................................................... Table 11.4 Lifeline and Link Up Support Payments ........................................................ Chart 2.1 Lifeline Assistance - Payments - by State or Jurisdiction .......................................Table 2.8 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - by State ........................................................ Table 2.6 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - Tribal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A2.pdf
  • Information for Allocating SLC Revenues ................................................. Table 1.21 Installation, Maintenance, and Customer Complaints ............................................ Table 9.1 Interstate Access Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 3.12 Interstate Access Support Payments by Study Area ........................................... Table 3.28 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by State or Jurisdiction ...... Table 3.11 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by Study Area ....................Table 3.27 Investment - Average Net ....................................................................................... Table 11.6 Investment - Gross .................................................................................................. Table 11.3 Investment - Other .................................................................................................. Table 11.13 Investment Reserves ............................................................................................... Table 11.4 Lifeline and Link Up Support Payments ........................................................ Chart 2.1 Lifeline Assistance - Payments - by State or Jurisdiction .......................................Table 2.8 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - by State ........................................................ Table 2.6 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - Tribal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A3.pdf
  • 147 299 1.42 77 304 Delaware 123 40 83 0.39 21 84 District of Columbia 188 38 150 0.71 38 153 Florida 2,013 840 1,173 5.56 301 1,195 Georgia 1,035 358 677 3.21 174 689 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 154 57 96 0.46 25 98 Idaho 190 60 130 0.62 33 132 Illinois 1,093 404 690 3.27 177 702 Indiana 597 247 350 1.66 90 356 Iowa 321 101 220 1.04 57 225 Kansas 290 79 211 1.00 54 214 Kentucky 385 157 228 1.08 58 232 Louisiana 363 169 193 0.92 50 197 Maine 161 52 109 0.52 28 111 Maryland 734 237 498 2.36 128 507 Massachusetts 873 257 616 2.92 158 628 Michigan 834
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • and payments for 2002 and 2003 can be found in the 2007 Universal Service Monitoring Report. Table 3.22 has HCLS payments. Table 3.23 has safety net additive support payments. Table 3.24 has safety valve support payments. Table 3.25 provides, by non-rural study area, the high cost support using the forward-looking high-cost model support mechanism. Table 3.26 has LTS payments. Table 3.27 has ICLS payments. Table 3.28 has IAS payments for price-cap companies. Table 3.29 has LSS payments. Table 3.30 has the total support payments for all seven programs. Each of these tables contains the annual amounts for only those years for which a support mechanism was in place. Table 3.27 has the final ICLS true-ups for 2002 through 2006, and Table
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • Table 1.21 Installation, Maintenance, and Customer Complaints ............................................ Table 9.1 Interstate Access Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 3.12 3 Index of Tables and Charts Interstate Access Support Payments by Study Area ........................................... Table 3.28 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by State or Jurisdiction ...... Table 3.11 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by Study Area ....................Table 3.27 Lifeline and Link Up Support Payments ........................................................ Chart 2.1 Lifeline Assistance - Payments - by State or Jurisdiction .......................................Table 2.8 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - by State ........................................................ Table 2.6 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - Tribal and Non-Tribal - by State .................... Table 2.7 Lifeline Monthly Support - by State ....................................................................... Table 2.3 Lifeline Subscribers and Link Up Beneficiaries ...................................................
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A2.txt
  • Table 1.21 Installation, Maintenance, and Customer Complaints ............................................ Table 9.1 Interstate Access Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 3.12 3 Index of Tables and Charts Interstate Access Support Payments by Study Area ........................................... Table 3.28 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by State or Jurisdiction ...... Table 3.11 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by Study Area ....................Table 3.27 Lifeline and Link Up Support Payments ........................................................ Chart 2.1 Lifeline Assistance - Payments - by State or Jurisdiction .......................................Table 2.8 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - by State ........................................................ Table 2.6 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - Tribal and Non-Tribal - by State .................... Table 2.7 Lifeline Monthly Support - by State ....................................................................... Table 2.3 Lifeline Subscribers and Link Up Beneficiaries ...................................................
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • 3 - 12 payments for 2004 can be found in the 2008 Universal Service Monitoring Report. Table 3.22 has HCLS payments. Table 3.23 has safety net additive support payments. Table 3.24 has safety valve support payments. Table 3.25 provides, by non-rural study area, the high cost support using the forward-looking high-cost model support mechanism. Table 3.26 has LTS payments. Table 3.27 has ICLS payments. Table 3.28 has IAS payments for price-cap companies. Table 3.29 has LSS payments. Table 3.30 has the total support payments for all seven programs. Each of these tables contains the annual amounts for only those years for which a support mechanism was in place. Table 3.27 has the final ICLS true-ups for 2005 through 2007, and Table
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.txt
  • 4.12 1972 41.8 0.24 1.26 2.31 0.21 1933 13.0 0.28 4.56 1973 44.4 0.25 1.23 2.29 0.22 1934 13.4 0.27 4.37 1974 49.3 0.26 1.12 2.25 0.22 1935 13.7 0.27 4.17 1975 53.8 0.27 1.09 2.23 0.24 1936 13.9 0.25 3.89 1976 56.9 0.29 1.08 2.20 0.25 1937 14.4 0.22 3.24 1977 60.6 0.28 1.01 2.18 0.25 1938 14.1 0.21 3.27 1978 65.2 0.29 0.95 2.09 0.25 1939 13.9 0.22 3.34 1979 72.6 0.29 0.86 1.76 0.26 1940 14.0 0.21 3.23 1980 82.4 0.30 0.79 1.34 0.27 1941 14.7 0.21 3.04 1981 90.9 0.33 0.77 1.21 0.31 1942 16.3 0.22 2.85 1982 96.5 0.34 0.76 1.09 0.32 1943 17.3 0.21 2.62 1983 99.6 0.35 0.75 1.09 0.33 1944 17.6 0.22 2.64
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
  • - by State .........Table 1.18 Installation, Maintenance, and Customer Complaints - 2009 .................................. Table 9.1 Interstate Access Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 3.12 Interstate Access Support Payments by Study Area ........................................... Table 3.28 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by State or Jurisdiction ...... Table 3.11 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by Study Area ................... Table 3.27 Lifeline and Link Up Support Payments ..........................................................Chart 2.1 Lifeline Assistance - Annual Payments - by State or Jurisdiction .............................Table 2.8 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - by State or Jurisdiction ...................................Table 2.6 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - Tribal and Non-Tribal Areas - by State .............Table 2.7 3 Index of Tables and Charts Lifeline Monthly Support - by State or Jurisdiction ..................................................Table
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A2.txt
  • - by State .........Table 1.18 Installation, Maintenance, and Customer Complaints - 2009 .................................. Table 9.1 Interstate Access Support Payments by State or Jurisdiction ................................. Table 3.12 Interstate Access Support Payments by Study Area ........................................... Table 3.28 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by State or Jurisdiction ...... Table 3.11 Interstate Common Line Support Trued-up Payments by Study Area ................... Table 3.27 Lifeline and Link Up Support Payments ..........................................................Chart 2.1 Lifeline Assistance - Annual Payments - by State or Jurisdiction .............................Table 2.8 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - by State or Jurisdiction ...................................Table 2.6 Lifeline Assistance - Subscribers - Tribal and Non-Tribal Areas - by State .............Table 2.7 3 Index of Tables and Charts Lifeline Monthly Support - by State or Jurisdiction ..................................................Table
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A3.txt
  • 291 742 0.91 California 1,300 713 3 3,998 2,957 8,970 11.05 Colorado 234 132 0 509 575 1,450 1.79 Connecticut 160 98 0 370 451 1,080 1.33 Delaware 44 26 0 97 131 298 0.37 District of Columbia 53 29 0 131 162 374 0.46 Florida 914 423 1 1,978 2,091 5,407 6.66 Georgia 423 182 1 1,019 1,034 2,658 3.27 Guam 8 4 0 9 21 43 0.05 Hawaii 64 18 0 140 181 403 0.50 Idaho 69 19 0 141 175 404 0.50 Illinois 478 259 1 1,331 1,288 3,356 4.13 Indiana 287 88 0 604 607 1,587 1.95 Iowa 112 48 0 281 293 735 0.90 Kansas 97 66 0 291 265 718 0.88 Kentucky 177 77 0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.txt
  • Monitoring Report, and payments for 2005 can be found in the 2009 Universal Service Monitoring Report. Table 3.22 has HCLS payments. Table 3.23 has safety net additive support payments. Table 3.24 has safety valve support payments. Table 3.25 provides, by non-rural study area, the high cost support using the forward-looking high-cost model support mechanism. Table 3.26 has LTS payments. Table 3.27 has ICLS payments. Table 3.28 has IAS payments for price-cap companies. Table 3.29 has LSS payments. Table 3.30 has the total support payments for all seven programs. Each of these tables contains the annual amounts for only those years for which a support mechanism was in place. Table 3.27 has the final ICLS true-ups for 2006 through 2008, and Table
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.txt
  • 0.25 0.33 0.17 0.33 0.21 0.33 0.26 0.33 0.21 0.33 3 - 300501Elct:EDI-CLEO/LASR Directory Listings Syntax 0.26 0.33 0.28 0.33 0.26 0.33 0.32 0.33 0.51 0.33 3 - 300700Elct Man:LEX-CLEO/LASR (Exc to LSC) Facilities Content Errs 2.29 5.00 1.88 5.00 2.40 5.00 2.24 5.00 2.94 5.00 3 - 300800Elct Man:LEX-CLEO/LASR (Exc to LSC) Resale Content Errs 5.67 5.00 2.43 5.00 3.27 5.00 1.63 5.00 1.67 5.00 3 - 300900Elct Man:EDI-CLEO/LASR (Exc to LSC) Facilities Content Errs 2.99 5.00 2.41 5.00 3.03 5.00 2.48 5.00 2.52 5.00 3 - 301000Elct Man:EDI-CLEO/LASR (Exc to LSC) Resale Content Errs 8.70 5.00 2.57 5.00 3.66 5.00 1.90 5.00 10.45 5.00 3 - 301200Man-Man:FAX Resale Content Errs 5.5310.00 3.8410.00 3.9310.00 2.7910.00 3.9410.00 3 - Average Reject
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.txt
  • appropriate enforcement action. 470 The order completion interval metric measures the amount of time it takes BellSouth to actually provide service on the orders it receives from competitive LECs and its own customers. See Florida B.2.1.18.1.1 (Order Completion Interval, Digital Loops 3.27, and 3.17 days for BellSouth's retail operations). 471 See BellSouth Varner Aff., Ex. PM-2 at para. 151. BellSouth also states that UDC circuits are not offered as retail products. Id. 472 See Florida B.2.18.18.1.1 (% Missed Installation Appointments, Digital Loops
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-12A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-12A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-12A1.txt
    • Expanded basic --- --- 14.11 15.00 16.44 17.41 19.23 21.36 22.61 23.59 8.6% Annual Change ** --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 5.9% 4.3% --- Programming --- --- 24.80 26.12 27.78 29.59 31.66 35.06 36.86 38.17 7.1% Annual Change ** --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 5.1% 3.6% --- Equipment --- --- 2.35 2.59 2.85 2.90 3.27 3.88 4.13 4.31 9.7% Annual Change ** --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 6.4% 4.4% --- Total 22.88 25.42 27.15 28.71 30.63 32.49 34.93 38.94 40.99 42.48 7.4% Annual % Change --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 5.3% 3.6% --- No. of channels 38 48.8 53.2 54 57.6 57.5 60.9 --- 69.7 72.5 5.5% Annual Change
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.txt
    • Bell Atlantic Dowell/Canny Decl. Attach. B at 35. For purposes of this discussion, we use the terms ``average completed interval'' and ``average installation interval'' interchangeably. With respect to customers of competing carriers, the average competed interval in June 1999 for loops with one to five lines was 6.55 days, while the average completion interval for Bell Atlantic retail customers was 3.27 days. Bell Atlantic Dowell/Canny Decl. Attach. D at 80 (metric PR-2-03 - Loop for June 1999). In July 1999, the average installation interval for loop orders of one to five lines was 5.39 days for competing carriers and 3.08 days for Bell Atlantic customers. Id. at 92 (metric PR-2-03 - Loop for July 1999). In September 1999, the average installation
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fc01269a.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fc01269a.pdf
    • Note that for some metrics during the period provided there may be changes in the metric definition, or changes in the retail analog applied, making it difficult to compare the data over time. AGGREGATE METRICS DISAGGREGATED METRICS 0.00 0.00 10.00 16.67 12.50 0.00 0.00 1b,2b,3b,4a,5a Interconnection Trunk Blockage NP-1-01-5120 % FTG Exceeding Blocking Standard - Common Final Trunks 4.21 4.19 3.27 0.84 0.42 NP-1-01-5400 % FTG Exceeding Blocking Standard - Dedicated Final Trunks 4.90 4.08 2.88 0.00 1.92 NP-1-02-5120 % FTG Exceeding Blocking Standard (No Exceptions) - Common Final Trunks 4.21 4.19 3.27 0.84 0.42 NP-1-02-5400 % FTG Exceeding Blocking Standard (No Exceptions) - Dedicated Final Trunks 4.90 5.44 4.32 0.68 3.85 NP-1-03-5400 Number Dedicated FTG Exceeding Blocking Standard - 2
  • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/FCC-05-191A1.html
    • ri0ruilu bibo lr ebsSie recuts srrbe f sisSo bcur erb2 ris0 sbc0 er5 riU sbs ea rg se a s a P e r c e n t a g e o f A d d r e s s a b l e M Jun-00 Jun-01 Jun-02 Jun-03 Jun-0 4 Jun- 05P? (5) DTV Households* 0.08% 0.27% 0.67% 1.50% 3.27 % 12.81% (6) DTV Stations on the Air** 4.42% 7.01% 16.37% 73.44% 83.80 % 89.81% (7) Digital Cable Subscribers* 5.95% 10.67% 15.08% 18.75% 21.12 % 23.59% (8) Radio Listeners*** 47.97% 47.78% 48.79% 48.75% 49.15 % 49.35% (1- DAB Receivers*** 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00 % 0.03% 0) (1- DAB Stations**** 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.54% 1.00 % 2.65% 1) Satellite DARS
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/antenna/index.htm?job=uls_transaction&page=daily
    • KB General Mobile Radio Service (GMRS) Application Records [174]Sun (07-16-12) 0.16 KB [175]Mon (07-10-12) 1.35 KB [176]Tue (07-11-12) 11.21 KB [177]Wed (07-12-12) 7.09 KB [178]Thu (07-13-12) 5.94 KB [179]Fri (07-14-12) 4.5 KB [180]Sat (07-15-12) 5.7 KB License Records [181]Sun (07-16-12) 0.16 KB [182]Mon (07-10-12) 21.79 KB [183]Tue (07-11-12) 7.77 KB [184]Wed (07-12-12) 4.54 KB [185]Thu (07-13-12) 3.92 KB [186]Fri (07-14-12) 3.27 KB [187]Sat (07-15-12) 20.77 KB Land Mobile - Private Application Records [188]Sun (07-16-12) 0.16 KB [189]Mon (07-10-12) 141.77 KB [190]Tue (07-11-12) 422.7 KB [191]Wed (07-12-12) 370.98 KB [192]Thu (07-13-12) 318.53 KB [193]Fri (07-14-12) 400.57 KB [194]Sat (07-15-12) 199.63 KB License Records [195]Sun (07-16-12) 6.95 KB [196]Mon (07-10-12) 821.96 KB [197]Tue (07-11-12) 668.81 KB [198]Wed (07-12-12) 465.53 KB [199]Thu (07-13-12) 314.67
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/rss/index.htm?job=ainf&id=68
    • Jan 2007 15:35:06 GMT Summary Permits: Auction No. 68 will offer nine construction permits in the FM Broadcast service. The construction permits to be auctioned are nine unsold FM construction permits from Auctions No. 37 and 62. Qualified Bidders: 32 Rounds Completed: 16 Bidding Days: 4 Results for Round 16 Gross Revenue: $3,446,000.00 - Dollar Change: $109,000.00 - % Change: 3.27 Net Revenue: $3,032,750.00 - Dollar Change: $87,750.00 - % Change: 2.98 New Bids: 5 Withdrawn Bids: 0 Proactive Waivers: 0 Bidders that Reduced Eligibility: 4 Permits with PWBs*: 9 FCC Held Permits: 0 Eligible Bidders: 16 (of 32 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=68T ue, 16 Jan 2007 16:50:02 GMT Summary Permits: Auction No. 68 will offer
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/index.htm?&job=transaction&page=daily
    • KB General Mobile Radio Service (GMRS) Application Records [197]Sun (07-16-12) 0.16 KB [198]Mon (07-10-12) 1.35 KB [199]Tue (07-11-12) 11.21 KB [200]Wed (07-12-12) 7.09 KB [201]Thu (07-13-12) 5.94 KB [202]Fri (07-14-12) 4.5 KB [203]Sat (07-15-12) 5.7 KB License Records [204]Sun (07-16-12) 0.16 KB [205]Mon (07-10-12) 21.79 KB [206]Tue (07-11-12) 7.77 KB [207]Wed (07-12-12) 4.54 KB [208]Thu (07-13-12) 3.92 KB [209]Fri (07-14-12) 3.27 KB [210]Sat (07-15-12) 20.77 KB Land Mobile - Private Application Records [211]Sun (07-16-12) 0.16 KB [212]Mon (07-10-12) 141.77 KB [213]Tue (07-11-12) 422.7 KB [214]Wed (07-12-12) 370.98 KB [215]Thu (07-13-12) 318.53 KB [216]Fri (07-14-12) 400.57 KB [217]Sat (07-15-12) 199.63 KB License Records [218]Sun (07-16-12) 6.95 KB [219]Mon (07-10-12) 821.96 KB [220]Tue (07-11-12) 668.81 KB [221]Wed (07-12-12) 465.53 KB [222]Thu (07-13-12) 314.67
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/index.htm?job=transaction&page=daily
    • KB General Mobile Radio Service (GMRS) Application Records [197]Sun (07-16-12) 0.16 KB [198]Mon (07-10-12) 1.35 KB [199]Tue (07-11-12) 11.21 KB [200]Wed (07-12-12) 7.09 KB [201]Thu (07-13-12) 5.94 KB [202]Fri (07-14-12) 4.5 KB [203]Sat (07-15-12) 5.7 KB License Records [204]Sun (07-16-12) 0.16 KB [205]Mon (07-10-12) 21.79 KB [206]Tue (07-11-12) 7.77 KB [207]Wed (07-12-12) 4.54 KB [208]Thu (07-13-12) 3.92 KB [209]Fri (07-14-12) 3.27 KB [210]Sat (07-15-12) 20.77 KB Land Mobile - Private Application Records [211]Sun (07-16-12) 0.16 KB [212]Mon (07-10-12) 141.77 KB [213]Tue (07-11-12) 422.7 KB [214]Wed (07-12-12) 370.98 KB [215]Thu (07-13-12) 318.53 KB [216]Fri (07-14-12) 400.57 KB [217]Sat (07-15-12) 199.63 KB License Records [218]Sun (07-16-12) 6.95 KB [219]Mon (07-10-12) 821.96 KB [220]Tue (07-11-12) 668.81 KB [221]Wed (07-12-12) 465.53 KB [222]Thu (07-13-12) 314.67
  • http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/weeklypn.htm?job=transaction&page=daily
    • KB General Mobile Radio Service (GMRS) Application Records [197]Sun (07-16-12) 0.16 KB [198]Mon (07-10-12) 1.35 KB [199]Tue (07-11-12) 11.21 KB [200]Wed (07-12-12) 7.09 KB [201]Thu (07-13-12) 5.94 KB [202]Fri (07-14-12) 4.5 KB [203]Sat (07-15-12) 5.7 KB License Records [204]Sun (07-16-12) 0.16 KB [205]Mon (07-17-12) 18.46 KB [206]Tue (07-11-12) 7.77 KB [207]Wed (07-12-12) 4.54 KB [208]Thu (07-13-12) 3.92 KB [209]Fri (07-14-12) 3.27 KB [210]Sat (07-15-12) 20.77 KB Land Mobile - Private Application Records [211]Sun (07-16-12) 0.16 KB [212]Mon (07-10-12) 141.77 KB [213]Tue (07-11-12) 422.7 KB [214]Wed (07-12-12) 370.98 KB [215]Thu (07-13-12) 318.53 KB [216]Fri (07-14-12) 400.57 KB [217]Sat (07-15-12) 199.63 KB License Records [218]Sun (07-16-12) 6.95 KB [219]Mon (07-17-12) 643.71 KB [220]Tue (07-11-12) 668.81 KB [221]Wed (07-12-12) 465.53 KB [222]Thu (07-13-12) 314.67
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.txt
    • Bell Atlantic Dowell/Canny Decl. Attach. B at 35. For purposes of this discussion, we use the terms ``average completed interval'' and ``average installation interval'' interchangeably. With respect to customers of competing carriers, the average competed interval in June 1999 for loops with one to five lines was 6.55 days, while the average completion interval for Bell Atlantic retail customers was 3.27 days. Bell Atlantic Dowell/Canny Decl. Attach. D at 80 (metric PR-2-03 - Loop for June 1999). In July 1999, the average installation interval for loop orders of one to five lines was 5.39 days for competing carriers and 3.08 days for Bell Atlantic customers. Id. at 92 (metric PR-2-03 - Loop for July 1999). In September 1999, the average installation
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fc01269a.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fc01269a.pdf
    • Note that for some metrics during the period provided there may be changes in the metric definition, or changes in the retail analog applied, making it difficult to compare the data over time. AGGREGATE METRICS DISAGGREGATED METRICS 0.00 0.00 10.00 16.67 12.50 0.00 0.00 1b,2b,3b,4a,5a Interconnection Trunk Blockage NP-1-01-5120 % FTG Exceeding Blocking Standard - Common Final Trunks 4.21 4.19 3.27 0.84 0.42 NP-1-01-5400 % FTG Exceeding Blocking Standard - Dedicated Final Trunks 4.90 4.08 2.88 0.00 1.92 NP-1-02-5120 % FTG Exceeding Blocking Standard (No Exceptions) - Common Final Trunks 4.21 4.19 3.27 0.84 0.42 NP-1-02-5400 % FTG Exceeding Blocking Standard (No Exceptions) - Dedicated Final Trunks 4.90 5.44 4.32 0.68 3.85 NP-1-03-5400 Number Dedicated FTG Exceeding Blocking Standard - 2
  • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2002/fcc02331.pdf
    • appropriate enforcement action. 470 The order completion interval metric measures the amount of time it takes BellSouth to actually provide service on the orders it receives from competitive LECs and its own customers. See Florida B.2.1.18.1.1 (Order Completion Interval, Digital Loops 3.27, and 3.17 days for BellSouth's retail operations). 471 See BellSouth Varner Aff., Ex. PM-2 at para. 151. BellSouth also states that UDC circuits are not offered as retail products. Id. 472 See Florida B.2.18.18.1.1 (% Missed Installation Appointments, Digital Loops
    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ldrpt101.pdf
      • Low-Income Support All Support High-Cost & Low-Income Support All Support 1998First Quarter 3.19% 3.91% 0.00% 0.72% Second Quarter 3.14 3.90 0.00 0.76 Third Quarter 3.14 3.89 0.00 0.75 Fourth Quarter 3.18 3.93 0.00 0.75 1999First Quarter 3.18 3.76 0.00 0.58 Second Quarter 3.05 3.62 0.00 0.57 Third Quarter 2.94 3.93 0.00 0.99 Fourth Quarter 2.89 3.99 0.00 1.10 2000First Quarter 3.27 5.88 0.00 0.00 Second Quarter 3.21 5.71 0.00 0.00 Third Quarter 3.77 5.54 0.00 0.00 Fourth Quarter 3.88 5.67 0.00 0.00 2001First Quarter 4.07 6.68 0.00 0.00 * These factors do not include any assessments for the Telecommunications Relay Service or administration of the North American Numbering Plan. Factors for Intrastate End-User Revenues Factors for Interstate End-User Revenues Universal Service
    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
      • Sprint AT&T WorldCom Sprint 1980 $1.01 $1.41 $2.35 $3.15 $2.37 $2.30 $3.54 $2.58 $2.50 $3.74 $2.81 $2.70 $3.77 $3.22 $2.90 $3.97 $3.61 $3.20 $4.17 $3.82 $3.30 1981 1.13 1.63 2.77 3.67 3.07 2.67 4.07 3.39 2.90 4.36 3.62 3.13 4.39 3.66 3.36 4.60 3.84 3.71 4.80 4.00 3.83 1982 1.76 $1.53 $1.53 2.38 $1.54 $1.55 3.00 $1.94 $1.92 3.90 3.28 3.27 4.09 3.42 3.43 4.37 3.63 3.62 4.49 3.74 3.74 4.60 3.84 3.85 5.15 4.32 4.32 1983 1.76 1.54 1.54 2.38 2.10 2.09 3.00 2.70 2.69 3.90 3.28 3.29 4.09 3.42 3.43 4.37 3.63 3.62 4.49 3.74 3.74 4.60 3.84 3.83 5.15 4.32 4.32 1984 1.65 1.48 1.62 2.27 1.96 2.19 2.79 2.56 2.76 3.69 3.33 3.49 3.87 3.48 3.63 4.06
    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
      • Evening, and Night Call 90-Mile Call AT&TWorldComSprintAT&TWorldComSprintAT&TWorldComSprintAT&TWorldComSprintAT&TWorldComSprintAT&TWorldComSprintAT&TWorldComSprintAT&TWorldComSprintAT&TWorldComSprint 1980$1.01 $1.41 $2.35 $3.15 $2.37 $2.30 $3.54 $2.58 $2.50 $3.74 $2.81 $2.70 $3.77 $3.22 $2.90 $3.97 $3.61 $3.20 $4.17 $3.82 $3.30 19811.13 1.63 2.77 3.67 3.07 2.67 4.07 3.39 2.90 4.36 3.62 3.13 4.39 3.66 3.36 4.60 3.84 3.71 4.80 4.00 3.83 19821.76 $1.53 $1.53 2.38 $1.54 $1.55 3.00 $1.94 $1.92 3.90 3.28 3.27 4.09 3.42 3.43 4.37 3.63 3.62 4.49 3.74 3.74 4.60 3.84 3.85 5.15 4.32 4.32 19831.76 1.54 1.54 2.38 2.10 2.09 3.00 2.70 2.69 3.90 3.28 3.29 4.09 3.42 3.43 4.37 3.63 3.62 4.49 3.74 3.74 4.60 3.84 3.83 5.15 4.32 4.32 19841.65 1.48 1.62 2.27 1.96 2.19 2.79 2.56 2.76 3.69 3.33 3.49 3.87 3.48 3.63 4.06 3.72 3.80
    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
      • 657 1992 619 647 1993 650 719 1994 681 756 $793 $681 1995 698 782 796 700 1996 757 887 870 763 1997 791 945 833 807 1998 818 915 811 831 1999 837 934 872 847 2000 862 986 889 876 2001 899 1,024 917 914 2002 944 1,050 1,021 950 1980 1.85% 2.96% 1981 1.98 2.88 1982 1.97 3.27 1983 2.00 3.48 1984 1.89 3.16 1985 1.86 2.90 1986 1.89 2.95 1987 1.96 3.10 1988 1.99 3.22 1989 1.95 3.29 1990 1.99 3.26 1991 1.99 3.27 1992 1.99 3.29 1993 2.03 3.48 1994 2.07 3.37 3.00% 2.12% 1995 2.09 3.29 2.98 2.14 1996 2.16 3.56 3.12 2.22 1997 2.19 3.70 2.84 2.28 1998 2.22 3.55 2.70 2.31 1999 2.18
    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
      • 650 719 1994 681 756 $793 $681 1995 698 782 796 700 1996 757 887 870 763 1997 791 945 833 807 1998 818 915 811 831 1999 837 934 872 847 2000 862 986 889 876 2001 899 1,024 917 914 2002 944 1,050 1,021 950 2003 946 1,027 968 954 1980 1.85% 2.96% 1981 1.98 2.88 1982 1.97 3.27 1983 2.00 3.48 1984 1.89 3.16 1985 1.86 2.90 1986 1.89 2.95 1987 1.96 3.10 1988 1.99 3.22 1989 1.95 3.29 1990 1.99 3.26 1991 1.99 3.27 1992 1.99 3.29 1993 2.03 3.48 1994 2.07 3.37 3.00% 2.12% 1995 2.09 3.29 2.98 2.14 1996 2.16 3.56 3.12 2.22 1997 2.19 3.70 2.84 2.28 1998 2.22 3.55 2.70 2.31 1999 2.18
    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror00.pdf
      • 12.17 82.08 1.58 12.31 3.67 18CenturyTel of Midwest-Michigan, Inc./CenturyTel of MI., Inc. 16.63 11.25 37.02 31.98 19CenturyTel of Ohio, Inc. 18.96 14.55 19.89 22.48 20CenturyTel of Wisconsin, Inc. 19.68 11.25 21.89 28.93 21Chillicothe Telephone Company, The 2/ 27.42 11.25 16.24 40.03 0.08 25.03 22Concord Telephone Co. 15.58 11.46 30.98 24.99 (423.81) 22.84 22.77 23El Paso Telephone Co. 1/ 2/ -4.84 3.27 251.20 (11.40) (305.07) (21.42) 24Farmers Telephone Cooperative, Inc. 1/ 13.26 11.61 8.17 21.61 18.25 19.48 25Fort Mill Telephone Company 15.04 11.47 17.20 31.41 71.25 41.43 26Gallatin River Communications, LLC 3/ 11.43 12.47 9.74 10.64 12.04 10.95 27Gulf Telephone Company 3/ 11.98 11.89 11.70 11.75 12.38 12.15 28Home Telephone Company, Inc. 12.30 11.60 28.97 10.99 8.27 10.52 29Horry Telephone Cooperative, Inc
    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
      • NEVADA 12.44 11.00 27.20 8.66 (534.12) 18.97 11.20 4CENTRAL TELEPHONE CO. OF NORTH CAROLINA 11.29 12.31 16.12 14.01 (100.92) 3.91 7.24 5CENTRAL TELEPHONE CO. OF TEXAS 14.94 14.08 19.77 22.77 7.37 16.42 6CENTRAL TELEPHONE CO. OF VIRGINIA 12.91 12.06 16.80 15.93 11.45 14.11 7ALLTEL ILLINOIS, INC. 12.97 12.50 15.02 9.70 27.51 13.01 8C-R TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.54 12.66 (6.76) 4.79 (0.51) 3.27 9CENTURY TELEPHONE OF OHIO, INC. 1/ 10.66 21.7 22.01 10.05 (14.93) 0.30 10CHILLICOTHE TELEPHONE COMPANY, THE 2/ 11.92 11.23 10.08 14.14 13.27 14.00 11CINCINNATI BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY 2/ 10.41 9.70 9.39 12.78 (146.35) 14.25 11.81 12CITIZENS TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.89 12.71 25.13 6.44 8.64 6.86 13CITIZENS UTILITIES COMPANY 11.64 12.52 9.36 10.55 14GREAT PLAINS COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 2/ 13.19 12.06 18.37 13.12
    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-97.pdf
      • High Cost and Low Income Support Mechanisms: 1998 Annual Annual Annual Payments Monthly Monthly Monthly Payments Payments Contributions Less Payments Contributions Less (Thousands) (Thousands) Contributions Per Loop Per Loop Contributions (Thousands) Per Loop ALABAMA $40,351 $29,436 $10,915 $1.40 $1.02 $0.38 ALASKA 63,427 5,663 57,764 13.30 1.19 12.11 ARIZONA 32,273 43,017 (10,743) 0.98 1.31 (0.33) ARKANSAS 71,422 17,794 53,627 4.35 1.08 3.27 CALIFORNIA 321,535 206,432 115,103 1.25 0.80 0.45 COLORADO 47,709 43,307 4,402 1.50 1.37 0.14 CONNECTICUT 5,029 35,604 (30,575) 0.19 1.38 (1.18) DELAWARE 20 8,398 (8,379) 0.00 1.32 (1.31) DIST. OF COLUMBIA 0 11,656 (11,656) 0.00 1.06 (1.06) FLORIDA 31,833 142,655 (110,822) 0.25 1.13 (0.88) GEORGIA 78,176 69,394 8,782 1.37 1.21 0.15 HAWAII 1,318 8,773 (7,455) 0.16 1.03 (0.88) IDAHO 29,126
    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend100.pdf
      • 0.72% 0.72% Second Quarter 3.14 0.76 3.90 0.00 0.76 0.76 Third Quarter 3.14 0.75 3.89 0.00 0.75 0.75 Fourth Quarter 3.18 0.75 3.93 0.00 0.75 0.75 1999First Quarter 3.18 0.58 3.76 0.00 0.58 0.58 Second Quarter 3.05 0.57 3.62 0.00 0.57 0.57 Third Quarter 2.94 0.99 3.93 0.00 0.99 0.99 Fourth Quarter 2.89 1.10 3.99 0.00 1.10 1.10 2000First Quarter 3.27 2.61 5.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 Factor for Intrastate End-User Revenue Factor for Interstate End-User Revenue UNIVERSAL SERVICE FUND FACTORS TABLE 22.5 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 1998Q11998Q21998Q31998Q41999Q11999Q21999Q31999Q42000Q1 CHART 22.1 INTERSTATE UNIVERSAL SERVICE FUND FACTORS High-Cost & Low-Income Support Schools, Libraries, & Rural Health Support 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 1998Q11998Q21998Q31998Q41999Q11999Q21999Q31999Q42000Q1 CHART 22.2 INTRASTATE UNIVERSAL SERVICE FUND
    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
      • 0.72% 0.72% Second Quarter 3.14 0.76 3.90 0.00 0.76 0.76 Third Quarter 3.14 0.75 3.89 0.00 0.75 0.75 Fourth Quarter 3.18 0.75 3.93 0.00 0.75 0.75 1999First Quarter 3.18 0.58 3.76 0.00 0.58 0.58 Second Quarter 3.05 0.57 3.62 0.00 0.57 0.57 Third Quarter 2.94 0.99 3.93 0.00 0.99 0.99 Fourth Quarter 2.89 1.10 3.99 0.00 1.10 1.10 2000First Quarter 3.27 2.61 5.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 Second Quarter 3.21 2.50 5.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 Third Quarter 3.77 1.77 5.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fourth Quarter 3.88 1.79 5.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 Factor for Intrastate End-User Revenues Factor for Interstate End-User Revenues Universal Service Fund Factors Table 20.5 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 1998Q1 1998Q2 1998Q3 1998Q4 1999Q1 1999Q2 1999Q3 1999Q4
    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
      • 0.72% 0.72% Second Quarter 3.14 0.76 3.90 0.00 0.76 0.76 Third Quarter 3.14 0.75 3.89 0.00 0.75 0.75 Fourth Quarter 3.18 0.75 3.93 0.00 0.75 0.75 1999First Quarter 3.18 0.58 3.76 0.00 0.58 0.58 Second Quarter 3.05 0.57 3.62 0.00 0.57 0.57 Third Quarter 2.94 0.99 3.93 0.00 0.99 0.99 Fourth Quarter 2.89 1.10 3.99 0.00 1.10 1.10 2000First Quarter 3.27 2.61 5.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 Second Quarter 3.21 2.50 5.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 Third Quarter 3.77 1.77 5.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fourth Quarter 3.88 1.79 5.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 2001First Quarter 4.07 2.61 6.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 Second Quarter 4.18 2.70 6.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 Third Quarter 4.15 2.74 6.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fourth Quarter 4.21 2.71 6.92 0.00 0.00
    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
      • 0.72 % Second Quarter 3.14 0.76 3.90 0.00 0.76 0.76 Third Quarter 3.14 0.75 3.89 0.00 0.75 0.75 Fourth Quarter 3.18 0.75 3.93 0.00 0.75 0.75 1999First Quarter 3.18 0.58 3.76 0.00 0.58 0.58 Second Quarter 3.05 0.57 3.62 0.00 0.57 0.57 Third Quarter 2.94 0.99 3.93 0.00 0.99 0.99 Fourth Quarter 2.89 1.10 3.99 0.00 1.10 1.10 2000First Quarter 3.27 2.61 5.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 Second Quarter 3.21 2.50 5.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 Third Quarter 3.77 1.77 5.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fourth Quarter 3.88 1.79 5.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 2001First Quarter 4.07 2.61 6.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 Second Quarter 4.18 2.70 6.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 Third Quarter 4.15 2.74 6.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 Source: Quarterly public notices on universal service
    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd98.pdf
      • 3.78 6.05 4.00 4.61 2.89 5.38 3.58 1993 3.36 2.22 3.95 2.53 5.53 3.78 6.47 4.30 5.07 3.31 5.66 3.68 1994 3.36 2.22 3.95 2.66 5.35 3.10 6.79 3.74 5.21 3.72 6.76 3.87 1995 3.55 2.33 4.11 2.44 5.31 3.08 6.57 3.75 5.75 3.47 6.12 3.38 1996 3.73 2.49 4.17 2.60 5.59 3.30 6.91 4.02 6.05 3.71 6.44 3.62 1997 3.27 2.37 3.75 2.46 4.35 3.15 6.51 4.38 5.58 4.08 5.91 3.96 Percent Change -73% -74% -69% -73% -64% -65% -46% -51% -38% -46% -51% -67% 1/The table shows rates in effect on December 31. Direct-dial rates are shown starting when offered which was either 1978 or 1979. Station-to-station rates are shown for early years. Rates do not reflect discount plans.
    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd99.pdf
      • 3.78 6.05 4.00 4.61 2.89 5.38 3.58 1993 3.36 2.22 3.95 2.53 5.53 3.78 6.47 4.30 5.07 3.31 5.66 3.68 1994 3.36 2.22 3.95 2.66 5.35 3.10 6.79 3.74 5.21 3.72 6.76 3.87 1995 3.55 2.33 4.11 2.44 5.31 3.08 6.57 3.75 5.75 3.47 6.12 3.38 1996 3.73 2.49 4.17 2.60 5.59 3.30 6.91 4.02 6.05 3.71 6.44 3.62 1997 3.27 2.37 3.75 2.46 4.35 3.15 6.51 4.38 5.58 4.08 5.91 3.96 1998 3.66 2.67 4.20 2.76 4.89 3.54 7.32 4.92 6.27 4.59 6.63 4.47 Percent Change -70% -70% -65% -69% -59% -61% -39% -45% -30% -39% -45% -63% 1950-1998 1/The table shows rates in effect on December 31. Direct-dial rates are shown starting when offered which was either 1978 or
    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd00.pdf
      • 1.75 1.65 1.60 1.55 1.50 1.40 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.25 1.05 0.60 Japan 24/ 1.76 1.91 1.62 1.31 1.04 0.94 0.94 0.91 0.86 0.29 0.29 0.27 Korea, Rep. 2.36 2.10 1.90 1.60 1.44 1.41 1.26 1.23 0.98 0.85 0.71 0.51 Mexico 25/ 0.89 0.79 0.75 0.72 0.68 0.58 0.53 0.48 0.40 0.37 0.19 0.19 Morocco 3.29 3.56 3.58 3.03 3.04 3.27 1.78 1.45 1.09 0.83 0.82 0.77 Netherlands 1.45 1.56 1.29 0.69 0.69 0.59 0.37 0.36 0.27 0.19 0.14 0.13 Nigeria 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.40 1.15 0.77 Pakistan 2.55 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.20 2.00 1.20 1.20 1.02 Peru 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.50 1.40 1.30 1.30 1.23 1.00 0.85 0.66 0.50 Philippines 1.98
    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd01.pdf
      • Israel 2.28 2.16 2.16 1.90 1.18 0.70 0.59 Italy 1.65 1.51 1.22 0.71 0.52 0.33 Jamaica 1.55 1.50 1.40 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.25 1.05 0.60 Japan 1.31 1.04 0.94 0.94 0.91 0.86 Korea, Rep. 1.60 1.44 1.41 1.26 1.23 0.98 0.85 0.71 0.51 Mexico 19/ 0.72 0.68 0.58 0.53 0.485 0.395 0.37 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 Morocco 3.03 3.04 3.27 1.78 1.45 1.09 0.83 0.82 0.77 0.38 Netherlands 0.69 0.69 0.59 0.37 0.36 0.27 Nigeria 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.40 1.15 0.77 0.51 Pakistan 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.20 2.00 1.20 1.20 0.84 0.54 0.42 0.42 Peru 1.50 1.40 1.30 1.30 1.23 1.00 0.85 0.66 0.50 0.38 Philippines 1.68 1.68 1.34 1.23 1.00 1.00 0.72 0.57 Poland 1.30
    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-1.pdf
      • 2.72 0 213 Indiana 164 1.96 0 154 Iowa 72 0.86 0 67 Kansas 56 0.68 0 53 Kentucky 86 1.03 0 81 Louisiana 66 0.79 0 62 Maine 36 0.43 0 33 Maryland 144 1.73 0 135 Massachusetts 108 1.30 0 102 Michigan 388 4.66 0 364 Minnesota 113 1.36 0 106 Mississippi 16 0.19 0 15 Missouri 272 3.27 0 255 Montana 39 0.46 0 36 Nebraska 64 0.76 0 60 Nevada 17 0.20 0 16 New Hampshire 22 0.26 0 20 New Jersey 262 3.14 0 245 New Mexico 55 0.66 0 51 New York 401 4.81 0 376 North Carolina 340 4.08 0 319 North Dakota 27 0.33 0 25 Northern Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA
    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
      • forward-looking non-rural high-cost model support mechanism. Under sections 54.309 3 - 11 that qualify for these payments are included in the table. Table 3.25 provides estimates, by non- rural study area, of the high cost support using the forward-looking high-cost model support mechanism, along with the hold-harmless support for the years 2000 through 2003.41 Table 3.26 has LTS payments. Table 3.27 has IAS payments for price-cap companies. Table 3.28 has ICLS payments. Table 3.29 has LSS payments. Table 3.30 has the total support payments for all seven programs. Each of these tables (except 3.31) contains the annual amounts for 1998 through 2003. The 1998 amounts in Tables 3.23, 3.26, and 3.29 are the actual payments after processing the final true-ups for
    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-intro.pdf
      • Information for Allocating Mobile Wireless Revenues .................................. Table 1.20 Information for Allocating Non-LEC Intrastate Toll Revenues ......................... Table 1.25 Information for Allocating SLC Revenues ................................................. Table 1.21 Installation, Maintenance, and Customer Complaints ............................................ Table 9.1 Interstate Access Support Payment Projections by Jurisdiction ............................. Table 3.12 3 Index of Tables and Charts Interstate Access Support Payment Projections by Study Area ..............................Table 3.27 Interstate Common Line Support Payment Projections by Jurisdiction ................. Table 3.13 Interstate Common Line Support Payment Projections by Study Area .................. Table 3.28 Investment - Average Net ....................................................................................... Table 11.6 Investment - Gross .................................................................................................. Table 11.3 Investment - Other .................................................................................................. Table 11.13 Investment Reserves ............................................................................................... Table 11.4 Lifeline Assistance - Payments - by State ...........................................................Table 2.7 Lifeline Assistance - Payments
    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
      • in its high-cost loop 3 - 11 that qualify for these payments are included in the table. Table 3.24 provides estimates, by non- rural study area, of the high cost support using the forward-looking high-cost model support mechanism, along with the hold-harmless support for the years 2000 through 2004.42 Table 3.25 has LTS payments. Table 3.26 has ICLS payments. Table 3.27 has IAS payments for price-cap companies. Table 3.28 has LSS payments. Table 3.29 has the total support payments for all seven programs. Each of these tables (except 3.24) contains the annual amounts for 1998 through 2004. The 1998 amounts in Tables 3.22, 3.25, and 3.28 are the actual payments after processing the final true-ups for 1998.43 Table 3.26 has the
    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-intro.pdf
      • 1.24 Information for Allocating Mobile Wireless Revenues .................................. Table 1.20 Information for Allocating Non-LEC Intrastate Toll ......................................Table 1.25 Information for Allocating SLC Revenues ................................................. Table 1.21 Installation, Maintenance, and Customer Complaints ............................................ Table 9.1 3 Index of Tables and Charts Interstate Access Support Payment Projections by State or Jurisdiction ................Table 3.11 Interstate Access Support Payment Projections by Study Area ..............................Table 3.27 Interstate Common Line Support Payment Projections by State or Jurisdiction ..... Table 3.10 Interstate Common Line Support Payment Projections by Study Area .................. Table 3.26 Investment - Average Net ....................................................................................... Table 11.6 Investment - Gross .................................................................................................. Table 11.3 Investment - Other .................................................................................................. Table 11.13 Investment Reserves ............................................................................................... Table 11.4 Lifeline and Link Up Support Payments ........................................................ Chart 2.1 Lifeline Assistance
    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
      • 9 - 13 Table 9.4: Company Comparision -- 1999 Customer Perception Surveys Company Bell AtlanticBell Atlantic BellSouth SBC SBC SBC US West GTE North South Ameritech PacificSouthwestern Percentage of Customers Dissatisfied Installations: Residential 5.06 5.66 9.15 7.80 16.34 5.70 7.08 7.08 Small Business 9.46 8.57 8.21 11.30 16.10 7.39 17.40 12.53 Large Business 7.19 10.26 6.06 NA 17.05 7.38 NA 3.27 Repairs:Residential 13.87 15.84 15.09 15.30 23.77 7.94 12.97 11.59 Small Business 10.79 13.00 10.73 14.08 16.81 5.98 16.05 12.22 Large Business 10.00 13.02 6.77 NA 19.50 8.12 NA 2.59 Business Office: Residential 7.43 5.65 8.39 8.63 13.94 6.54 2.78 1.81 Small Business 8.27 9.94 10.63 14.21 17.37 7.37 6.85 3.44 Large Business 7.55 10.82 6.34 5.17 15.10 5.58 NA 0.90
    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
      • Dissatisfied .................. Table 9.4 Customer Perception Surveys - Sample Sizes ........................................................Table 9.5 Expenses and Taxes ................................................................................................Table 11.2 Expenses - Total Operating .....................................................................................Table 11.9 Factors - Interstate DEM - Unweighted ...................................................Table 8.11 Factors - Interstate DEM - Weighted ......................................................Table 8.12 High-Cost Loop Fund - 1999 Data - by Jurisdiction..........................................Table 3.15 High-Cost Loop Fund - 1999 Data - by Study Area ...........................................Table 3.27 High-Cost Loop Fund - Percentage Changes - by Jurisdiction.......................... Table 3.16 High-Cost Loop Fund - Percentage Changes - by Study Area ............................Table 3.28 High-Cost Loop Payment Formulas ..................................................................Table 3.1 High-Cost Loop Payment History .........................................................................Table 3.2 High-Cost Loop Payment Projections - by Jurisdiction....................................... Table 3.8 High-Cost Loop Payment Projections - by Study Area .......................................Table 3.21 High-Cost Loop Payments - by Jurisdiction....................................................Table
    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
      • by Jurisdiction ......................... Table 3.10 Local Switching Support - Payment Projections - by Study Area .......................... Table 3.28 Long-Term Support Mechanism ­ Net Dollar Flow by State .......................... Table 3.15 Long-Term Support - Payment History .................................................................. Table 3.6 Long-Term Support - Payment Projections - by Jurisdiction ................................. Table 3.9 Long-Term Support - Payment Projections - by Study Area .................................. Table 3.27 Loops - by Jurisdiction ....................................................................... Table 3.23 Loops - by Study Area ........................................................................ Table 3.35 Low-Income Program Dollars by State ........................................................ Table 2.2 Low-Income Program Dollars by Study Area .............................................. Table 2.3 Low-Income Programs Fund Size Projections ............................................ Table 2.4 Low-Income Support Programs ­ Net Dollar Flow by State ........................... Table 2.13 Minutes - Dial Equipment - Interstate ................................................................. Table
    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/QualSvc/qual00.pdf
      • text for notes and data qualifications Table 2(d):Company Comparision -- 1999 Customer Perception Surveys Company BellSouth Qwest SBC SBC SBC Verizon Verizon Verizon Ameritech PacificSouthwestern North South GTE Percentage of Customers Dissatisfied Installations:Residential 9.15 7.08 7.80 16.34 5.70 5.06 5.66 7.08 Small Business 8.21 17.40 11.30 16.10 7.39 9.46 8.57 12.53 Large Business 6.06 NA NA 17.05 7.38 7.19 10.26 3.27 Repairs:Residential 15.09 12.97 15.30 23.77 7.94 13.87 15.84 11.59 Small Business 10.73 16.05 14.08 16.81 5.98 10.79 13.00 12.22 Large Business 6.77 NA NA 19.50 8.12 10.00 13.02 2.59 Business Office: Residential 8.39 2.78 8.63 13.94 6.54 7.43 5.65 1.81 Small Business 10.63 6.85 14.21 17.37 7.37 8.27 9.94 3.44 Large Business 6.34 NA 5.17 15.10 5.58 7.55 10.82 0.90
    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/00socc.pdf
      • 1.50 1.40 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.25 1.05 0.60 0.38 Japan 10/ 1.76 1.91 1.62 1.31 1.04 0.94 0.94 0.91 0.86 0.29 0.29 0.27 0.26 Korea, Rep. 2.36 2.10 1.90 1.60 1.44 1.41 1.26 1.23 0.98 0.85 0.71 0.51 0.38 Mexico 11/ 0.89 0.791 0.75 0.715 0.68 0.58 0.53 0.485 0.395 0.37 0.19 0.19 0.19 Morocco 3.29 3.56 3.58 3.03 3.04 3.27 1.78 1.45 1.09 0.83 0.82 0.77 0.75 Netherlands 1.45 1.56 1.29 0.69 0.69 0.59 0.37 0.36 0.27 0.19 0.14 0.13 0.12 Nigeria 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.40 1.15 0.77 0.75 Pakistan 2.55 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.20 2.00 1.20 1.20 0.84 0.72 Peru 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.50 1.40 1.30 1.30 1.23 1.00 0.85
    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/01socc.pdf
      • 1.50 1.40 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.25 1.05 0.60 0.38 0.38 Japan 10/ 1.91 1.62 1.31 1.04 0.94 0.94 0.91 0.86 0.29 0.29 0.27 0.27 0.27 Korea, Rep. 2.10 1.90 1.60 1.44 1.41 1.26 1.23 0.98 0.85 0.71 0.51 0.38 0.38 Mexico 11/ 0.79 0.75 0.72 0.68 0.58 0.53 0.49 0.40 0.37 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 Morocco 3.56 3.58 3.03 3.04 3.27 1.78 1.45 1.09 0.83 0.82 0.76 0.77 0.76 Netherlands 1.56 1.29 0.69 0.69 0.59 0.37 0.36 0.27 0.19 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.13 Nigeria 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.40 1.15 0.76 0.51 0.51 Pakistan 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.20 2.00 1.20 1.20 0.84 0.54 0.54 Peru 2.00 2.00 1.50 1.40 1.30 1.30 1.23 1.00 0.85
    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/02socc.pdf
      • 1.25 1.05 0.60 0.38 0.38 0.38 Japan 8/ 9/ 1.62 1.31 1.04 0.94 0.94 0.91 0.86 0.29 0.29 0.27 0.27 0.28 0.29 Korea, Rep. 8/ 9/ 1.90 1.60 1.44 1.41 1.26 1.23 0.98 0.85 0.71 0.51 0.38 0.38 0.38 Mexico 8/ 10/ 0.75 0.72 0.68 0.58 0.53 0.49 0.40 0.37 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 Morocco 9/ 3.58 3.03 3.04 3.27 1.78 1.45 1.09 0.83 0.82 0.77 0.38 0.40 0.41 Netherlands 9/ 1.29 0.69 0.69 0.59 0.37 0.36 0.27 0.19 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.14 Nigeria 9/ 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.40 1.15 0.77 0.51 0.40 0.41 Pakistan 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.20 2.00 1.20 1.20 0.84 0.54 0.42 0.42 Peru 9/ 2.00 1.50 1.40 1.30 1.30
    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/03socc.pdf
      • Israel 2.28 2.16 2.16 1.90 1.18 0.70 0.59 Italy 1.65 1.51 1.22 0.71 0.52 0.33 Jamaica 1.55 1.50 1.40 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.25 1.05 0.60 Japan 1.31 1.04 0.94 0.94 0.91 0.86 Korea, Rep. 1.60 1.44 1.41 1.26 1.23 0.98 0.85 0.71 0.51 Mexico 7/ 0.72 0.68 0.58 0.53 0.485 0.395 0.37 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 Morocco 3.03 3.04 3.27 1.78 1.45 1.09 0.83 0.82 0.77 0.38 Netherlands 0.69 0.69 0.59 0.37 0.36 0.27 Nigeria 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.40 1.15 0.77 0.51 Pakistan 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.20 2.00 1.20 1.20 0.84 0.54 0.42 0.42 Peru 1.50 1.40 1.30 1.30 1.23 1.00 0.85 0.66 0.50 0.38 Philippines 1.68 1.68 1.34 1.23 1.00 1.00 0.72 0.57 Poland 1.30
    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/95socc.pdf
      • PANAMA, REPUBLIC OF INTERNATIONAL DIAL 1.97 1.39 1.23 1.63 1.23 1.11 ALL OTHER* 2.65 2.12 1.73 1.65 1.25 1.13 4PM-MIDN 7AM-4PM MIDN-7AM 4PM-MIDN 7AM-4PM MIDN-7AM PERU INTERNATIONAL DIAL 2.18 1.57 1.30 1.94 1.39 1.16 ALL OTHER* 2.80 2.61 2.14 1.90 1.39 1.25 5PM-2AM 2AM-11AM 11AM-5PM 5PM-2AM 2AM-11AM 11AM-5PM PHILIPPINES INTERNATIONAL DIAL 2.37 1.56 1.35 2.10 1.39 1.20 ALL OTHER* 3.86 3.27 2.73 2.13 1.41 1.23 7AM-1PM 1PM-MIDN MIDN-7AM 7AM-1PM 1PM-MIDN MIDN-7AM POLAND, PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF INTERNATIONAL DIAL 1.76 1.28 1.16 1.57 1.16 1.05 ALL OTHER* 2.92 2.10 1.91 1.60 1.18 1.07 1PM-8PM 7AM-1PM 8PM-7AM 1PM-8PM 7AM-1PM 8PM-7AM PORTUGAL (INCLUDING AZORES INTERNATIONAL DIAL 1.94 1.34 1.11 1.72 1.20 1.02 AND MADEIRA ISLANDS) ALL OTHER* 2.65 1.74 1.37 1.75 1.22 1.03 7AM-5PM 5PM-1AM
    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/96socc.pdf
      • TEN FIVE TEN FIVE TEN FIVE TEN FIVE TEN FIVE TEN FIVE TEN FIVE TEN FIVE TEN 1980 1/ 1.65 3.30 0.66 1.32 1.45 2.90 0.58 1.16 1.15 2.30 0.46 0.92 1981 2/ 1.91 3.83 0.77 1.53 1.68 3.36 0.67 1.35 1.33 2.67 0.53 1.07 1982 3/ 2.16 4.32 0.91 1.82 0.66 1.31 1.87 3.74 0.80 1.60 0.64 1.27 1.64 3.27 0.70 1.39 0.50 1.00 1983 4/ 2.16 4.32 1.00 1.99 0.78 1.56 1.87 3.74 0.90 1.80 0.70 1.40 1.65 3.29 0.80 1.59 0.60 1.20 1984 5/ 2.39 4.61 1.39 2.69 0.94 1.81 2.06 3.98 1.26 2.43 0.83 1.61 1.80 3.49 1.08 2.09 0.71 1.36 1985 6/ 2.17 4.10 1.34 2.56 0.91 1.73 1.93 3.70 1.20 2.30 0.81 1.56 1.76 3.34
    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/97socc.pdf
      • TEN FIVE TEN FIVE TEN FIVE TEN FIVE TEN FIVE TEN FIVE TEN FIVE TEN FIVE TEN 1980 1/ 1.65 3.30 0.66 1.32 1.45 2.90 0.58 1.16 1.15 2.30 0.46 0.92 1981 2/ 1.91 3.83 0.77 1.53 1.68 3.36 0.67 1.35 1.33 2.67 0.53 1.07 1982 3/ 2.16 4.32 0.91 1.82 0.66 1.31 1.87 3.74 0.80 1.60 0.64 1.27 1.64 3.27 0.70 1.39 0.50 1.00 1983 4/ 2.16 4.32 1.00 1.99 0.78 1.56 1.87 3.74 0.90 1.80 0.70 1.40 1.65 3.29 0.80 1.59 0.60 1.20 1984 5/ 2.39 4.61 1.39 2.69 0.94 1.81 2.06 3.98 1.26 2.43 0.83 1.61 1.80 3.49 1.08 2.09 0.71 1.36 1985 6/ 2.17 4.10 1.34 2.56 0.91 1.73 1.93 3.70 1.20 2.30 0.81 1.56 1.76 3.34
    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/98SOCC.PDF
      • DATA CORP. CO. REVENUES 5,194 17,154 1/ 53,223 31,566 23,123 1,542 COSTS & EXPENSES 4,305 12,961 1/ 45,736 24,938 17,219 1,364 INTEREST EXPENSE 264 611 427 1,335 837 112 OTHER INCOME & ADJUSTMENTS 2/ 347 2,055 2,410 (352) 684 13 INCOME TAXES 447 2,031 3,072 2,008 2,224 22 NET INCOME 525 3,606 6,398 2,933 3,527 57 EARNINGS PER SHARE 1.91 3.27 3.59 1.89 1.79 0.22 DIVIDENDS PER SHARE 1.18 1.22 1.32 1.54 0.73 0 AVG. SHARES OUTSTANDING (MIL.) 274 1,102 1,800 1,578 1,970 259 TOTAL ASSETS 9,374 30,299 59,550 55,144 39,410 5,293 PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIP. (NET) 4,828 14,305 26,903 36,816 23,940 4,049 LONG-TERM DEBT 3,492 5,557 5,556 17,646 8,715 1,900 SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY 3,271 10,897 25,522 13,025 16,110 1,793 OPERATING DATA:
    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/prelim02socc.pdf
      • 1.25 1.05 0.60 0.38 0.38 0.38 Japan 8/ 10/ 1.62 1.31 1.04 0.94 0.94 0.91 0.86 0.29 0.29 0.27 0.27 0.28 0.29 Korea, Rep. 8/ 10/ 1.90 1.60 1.44 1.41 1.26 1.23 0.98 0.85 0.71 0.51 0.38 0.38 0.38 Mexico 8/ 9/ 0.75 0.72 0.68 0.58 0.53 0.49 0.40 0.37 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 Morocco 10/ 3.58 3.03 3.04 3.27 1.78 1.45 1.09 0.83 0.82 0.77 0.38 0.40 0.41 Netherlands 10/ 1.29 0.69 0.69 0.59 0.37 0.36 0.27 0.19 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.14 Nigeria 10/ 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.40 1.15 0.77 0.51 0.40 0.41 Pakistan 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.20 2.00 1.20 1.20 0.84 0.54 0.42 0.42 Peru 10/ 2.00 1.50 1.40 1.30 1.30
    • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp35.pdf
      • given experimental session. These regressions were run to determine whether sellers varied in their ability to operate profitably in the various concentration treatments.70 Observations = 24 F(3, 20) = 2.38 Prob > F = 0.1000 R2 = .2631 Root MSE = 50.43 Seller #1 Net Surplus Coefficient (t-value) (95% Confidence. Interval) Low/High -27.37 (1.09) -79.97 25.22 High/High -55.87 (-2.22) -108.47 -3.27 Period -13.75 (-1.49) -32.95 5.45 Constant 49.5 (.79) -80.77 179.77 Table 18: Seller #1 Net Surplus Regression (CAP MFN Treatment) 70 In the regressions that employ Seller #3 Net Surplus and Seller #4 Net Surplus as dependent variables, a Shapiro-Wilkes test rejects the null hypothesis that the respective regression error terms are normally distributed. 46 Observations = 24 F(3, 20)
    • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/FCC-05-191A1.html
      • ri0ruilu bibo lr ebsSie recuts srrbe f sisSo bcur erb2 ris0 sbc0 er5 riU sbs ea rg se a s a P e r c e n t a g e o f A d d r e s s a b l e M Jun-00 Jun-01 Jun-02 Jun-03 Jun-0 4 Jun- 05P? (5) DTV Households* 0.08% 0.27% 0.67% 1.50% 3.27 % 12.81% (6) DTV Stations on the Air** 4.42% 7.01% 16.37% 73.44% 83.80 % 89.81% (7) Digital Cable Subscribers* 5.95% 10.67% 15.08% 18.75% 21.12 % 23.59% (8) Radio Listeners*** 47.97% 47.78% 48.79% 48.75% 49.15 % 49.35% (1- DAB Receivers*** 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00 % 0.03% 0) (1- DAB Stations**** 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.54% 1.00 % 2.65% 1) Satellite DARS
    • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-2A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-2A1.pdf
      • analysis. Accordingly we will turn to an analysis of the changes in revenues resulting from changes in the presence of LPFM stations. Table 9 Average Full-Service Commercial FM Stations' Revenue per Adult by Market Year No LPFM One LPFM Two or More LPFM Market Rank 1 - 100 Market Measure 2005 3.47 3.66 3.03 * (663) (378) (580) 2007 3.45 3.27 3.17 (447) (381) (783) 2009 2.50 2.42 2.22 * (473) (344) (825) Contour Measure 2005 2.69 3.38 * 4.38 * (737) (407) (477) 2007 2.45 3.22 * 4.10 * (595) (396) (620) 2009 1.81 2.23 * 2.87 * (605) (349) (688) Market Rank 101 - 200 Market Measure 2005 5.73 4.18 * 3.78 * (371) (308) (406) 2007 5.57 4.67
    • http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files/ITRND01.pdf
      • 1.42 1.28 1.08 0.85 0.68 0.46 0.46 Israel 2.16 2.16 1.90 1.18 0.70 0.59 Italy 1.51 1.22 0.71 0.52 0.33 Jamaica 1.50 1.40 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.25 1.05 0.60 Japan 1.04 0.94 0.94 0.91 0.86 Korea, Rep. 1.44 1.41 1.26 1.23 0.98 0.85 0.71 0.51 Mexico 20/ 0.68 0.58 0.53 0.485 0.395 0.37 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 Morocco 3.04 3.27 1.78 1.45 1.09 0.83 0.82 0.77 0.38 Netherlands 0.69 0.59 0.37 0.36 0.27 Nigeria 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.40 1.15 0.77 0.51 Pakistan 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.20 2.00 1.20 1.20 0.84 0.54 0.42 0.42 Peru 1.40 1.30 1.30 1.23 1.00 0.85 0.66 0.50 0.38 Philippines 1.68 1.34 1.23 1.00 1.00 0.72 0.57 Poland 1.25 1.20 1.15 0.95 0.70 0.55
    • http://www.fcc.gov/mb/peer_review/prlpfm_rpt_economic_study.pdf
      • turn to an analysis of the changes in revenues resulting from changes in the presence of LPFM stations. Federal Communications Commission DA 12-2 84 Table 9 Average Full-Service Commercial FM Stations' Revenue per Adultby Market Year No LPFM One LPFM Two or More LPFM Market Rank 1 -100 Market Measure 2005 3.47 3.66 3.03 * (663) (378) (580) 2007 3.45 3.27 3.17 (447) (381) (783) 2009 2.50 2.42 2.22 * (473) (344) (825) Contour Measure 2005 2.69 3.38 * 4.38 * (737) (407) (477) 2007 2.45 3.22 * 4.10 * (595) (396) (620) 2009 1.81 2.23 * 2.87 * (605) (349) (688) Market Rank 101 -200 Market Measure 2005 5.73 4.18 * 3.78 * (371) (308) (406) 2007 5.57 4.67 *
    • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/exparte/aol_response082800.pdf
      • content providers to fuel the development of greatly enhanced and wholly new forms of enticing and useful interactive broadband content both for AOL subscribers and Internet users in general. We describe these in further detail in our August 22, 2000 ex parte letter to Cable Services Bureau Chief Deborah Lathen regarding the public interest benefits of our merger. 17 Other 3.27Please list and describe each existing joint venture and/or contract between Time Warner and/or AOL and/or AT&T (please exclude contracts between AT&T and Time Warner for the sale of video programming). Separately list those joint ventures or contracts offering service in the United States, and those offering service outside of the United States. Please include in your description (where applicable): the