FCC Web Documents citing 5.53

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-109A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-109A1.pdf
  • Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission (``Bureau'') and DRS Technologies, Inc. (``DRS Technologies''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau into whether DRS Technologies complied with sections 301 and 310(d) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and with sections 1.948, 5.53(a), 5.59(d), and 25.119 of the Commission's rules (``Rules''), relating to several transactions completed by DRS Technologies and its wholly-owned subsidiary companies between April 1, 2008 and January 1, 2010, and to DRS Technologies' operation of certain experimental radio facilities. The Bureau and DRS Technologies have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1872A1.txt
  • ITU Radio Regulations, Edition of 2001, became effective internationally on January 1, 2002, except as provided in the references in Article 59. We are updating Section 2.100 of our Rules to reflect this fact. In its 2001 Radio Regulations, the ITU modified the international footnotes to its Table of Frequency Allocations by deleting the ``S'' prefix. For example, international footnote S5.53 was revised as international footnote 5.53. In addition, the ITU modified certain international footnotes to remove the ``S'' prefix from references to the Radio Regulations. For example, Article S31 was revised as Article 31 in footnote 5.110. In order to assist the Federal Register in codifying international footnotes and in order to prevent confusion to the public, we are updating
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2152A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2152A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2152A1.txt
  • than broadcast) subpart b - applications and licenses Brief Description: These rules set out eligibility, application, licensing and operating procedures and requirements for experimental stations. Need: These rules permit the experimentation in new radio technology and applications while ensuring the protection of incumbent services. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. §§ 154, 302, 307. Section Number and Title: 5.51(c) Eligibility of license. 5.53(b) Stations authorization required. PART 15 - RADIOFREQUENCY DEVICES Brief Description: These rules provide the parameters necessary to permit the unlicensed operation of radiofrequency devices, including specification of the levels of wanted and unwanted emissions and frequencies of permitted operation Need: These rules are necessary to promote the efficient use of the radio spectrum by preventing harmful interference to licensed radio
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A4.txt
  • DMAHouseholds(000s) 905.9 607.9 1,180.3 CommercialStation 0.76 1.00 0.53 OwnershipInformation LocalOwnershipInformation LocallyOwned(percent) 25.17 11.80 37.49 MinorityOwned(percent) 0.74 0.85 0.65 FemaleOwned(percent) 1.42 1.27 1.56 ParentOwnershipInformation Numberofstationsownedbyparent 21.34 22.94 19.87 Parentrevenue(millions) $302.13$405.27$207.16 PercentofU.S.householdscoveredbyparent 7.61 8.08 7.17 Cross-OwnershipInformation Newspaper-TVcross-ownership(percent) 1.89 3.39 0.52 Radio-TVcross-ownership(percent) 18.35 9.83 26.19 AdMarketInformation ScheduledDuration(minutes) 58.06 58.12 57.95 Ads TotalAdTime(minutes) 11.95 12.28 11.24 AdShare(percent) 0.21 0.21 0.20 Promotions TotalPromoTime(minutes) 5.79 5.91 5.53 PromoShare(percent) 0.10 0.10 0.09 Ads+Promos TotalAd+PromoTime(minutes) 17.75 18.19 16.77 TotalAd+PromoShare(percent) 0.31 0.31 0.29 RevenueandPrice TotalRevenuefromAllAds(000s) $22.83 $27.80 $11.99 AveragePriceper30-secondspot(000s) $31.31 $37.34 $18.17 Observations 4,437 2,127 2,310 Notes:Reportedinthetablearesamplestatisticsforthedatausedinouranalysisoftelevisionstation ownershipstructureonthequantityandqualityoftelevisionprogramming.Anobservationisabroadcast- television-station-year,thusthe(e.g.)newsprogrammingisthepercentageofquarterhoursofferingnews programmingacrossalltheprogramsofferedbythatstationbetween6:00p.m.and12:00a.m.EST(or theequivalent)duringeachofthetwoweeksperyearfor4years(cf.Table1)forwhichwehavedata.See Section??formoredetails.Source:Diwadi,Roberts,andWise(2007),TMS,andauthorcalculations. 44 Table16: SampleStatisticsforOwnershipAnalysis,Page2 ProgrammingVariables All"Big-4" Other Variable StationsStationsStations NewsProgramming AnyNews 18.95 28.43 10.22 NetworkNews 6.00 11.47 0.96 LocalNews 12.95 16.96 9.26 PublicAffairsProgramming 2.82 0.14 5.28 MinorityProgramming Spanish-LanguageProgramming 1.69
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • (-6.25) 0.0012 32,628 -7.28 (-1.25) 0.00 144 -1.92 (-0.23) 0.02 144 56 Origination Angle -2.29* (-3.04) 0.0003 32,597 3.33 (0.52) -0.01 144 5.16 (0.63) 0.25 144 56 Live Angle -0.05 (-0.08) 0.0000 32,604 3.87 (0.65) 0.00 144 1.92 (0.25) 0.25 144 56 Content Angle 2.02* (2.53) 0.0001 43,353 -6.11 (-0.78) 0.00 194 1.86 (0.17) 0.10 194 82 Origination Angle 4.22* (5.53) 0.0007 43,314 -3.63 (-0.50) 0.00 193 14.07 (1.45) 0.17 193 82 Live Angle 3.95* (5.62) 0.0007 43,332 -0.92 (-0.14) -0.01 194 12.58 (1.50) 0.25 194 82 Content Angle -4.93* (-5.03) 0.0007 34,970 5.95 (0.67) 0.00 145 2.13 (0.19) 0.42 145 75 Origination Angle -1.36 (-1.51) 0.0000 34,946 1.39 (0.17) -0.01 145 10.26 (0.85) 0.23 145 75 Live Angle 0.25 (0.29)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-402A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-402A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-402A1.txt
  • Viewing Error Weekly Error Hours Circulation Nov. 2004 12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Feb. 2005 13 0.09 0.10 9.24 11.65 Nov. 2005 18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Feb. 2006 24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TABLE 2 - WTLV VIEWING IN GAINESVILLE Survey Households Share Standard Net Standard Year Studied Viewing Error Weekly Error Hours Circulation Nov. 2004 12 3.43 3.55 5.53 6.49 Feb. 2005 13 1.22 0.99 13.60 12.49 Nov. 2005 18 0.17 0.16 2.12 2.28 Feb. 2006 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TABLE 3 - WJXT VIEWING IN GAINESVILLE Survey Households Share Standard Net Standard Year Studied Viewing Error Weekly Error Hours Circulation Nov. 2004 12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Feb. 2005 13 0.92 0.76 13.60 12.49 Nov. 2005 18
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4389A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4389A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4389A1.txt
  • because neither would provide a first or second NCE service to at least ten percent of the population. Harris argues that its proposed first or second NCE service to 28,453 people (9.46 percent of the population) comes very close to the ten percent threshold and should be preferred over HFC's proposed first or second NCE service to only 4,886 people (5.53 percent of the population). Harris asserts that a waiver of the ten percent threshold would serve the public interest by bringing new service to substantially more people than HFC's proposal. Harris acknowledges that the Commission denied a similar waiver request in the Omnibus Order. Nevertheless, Harris maintains that the equities of the current case are different because Harris could have
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-530A1.txt
  • G31 and G106; and (3) add footnote G127. § 2.106 Table of Frequency Allocations. The revisions and additions read as follows: * * * * * Table of Frequency Allocations 0-275 kHz (VLF/LF) Page 1 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Table Region 2 Table Region 3 Table Federal Table Non-Federal Table Below 9 (Not Allocated) 5.53 5.54 Below 9 (Not Allocated) 5.53 5.54 9-14 RADIONAVIGATION 9-14 RADIONAVIGATION US18 US294 14-19.95 FIXED MARITIME MOBILE 5.57 5.55 5.56 14-19.95 FIXED MARITIME MOBILE 5.57 US294 14-19.95 Fixed US294 19.95-20.05 STANDARD FREQUENCY AND TIME SIGNAL (20 kHz) 19.95-20.05 STANDARD FREQUENCY AND TIME SIGNAL (20 kHz) US294 20.05-70 FIXED MARITIME MOBILE 5.57 20.05-59 FIXED MARITIME MOBILE 5.57 US294 20.05-59 FIXED US294
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-762A1.txt
  • refer to U.S., non-Federal, and Federal footnotes in this Order, we will use the same nomenclature specified in Section 2.105 of the Commission's Rules and employed in the U.S. Table. For the international footnotes we reference in this Order, however, we will substitute a different nomenclature to help identify those footnotes. Specifically, the ITU Radio Regulations refer to international footnote 5.53 as Radio Regulation (RR) No. 5.53, which is simply abbreviated as ``No. 5.53.'' Instead of using this abbreviation, however, we will use the abbreviation ``RR 5.53.'' We believe this will more clearly indicate that we are referring to an international footnote. Prior to WRC-07, the U.S. Table included references to 130 international footnotes. WRC-07 modified 19 and suppressed (i.e., removed)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-109A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-109A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-109A1.txt
  • Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission (``Bureau'') and DRS Technologies, Inc. (``DRS Technologies''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau into whether DRS Technologies complied with sections 301 and 310(d) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and with sections 1.948, 5.53(a), 5.59(d), and 25.119 of the Commission's rules (``Rules''), relating to several transactions completed by DRS Technologies and its wholly-owned subsidiary companies between April 1, 2008 and January 1, 2010, and to DRS Technologies' operation of certain experimental radio facilities. The Bureau and DRS Technologies have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-447A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-447A3.txt
  • 41 ARTICLE 5 Frequency allocations Section IV ­ Table of Frequency Allocations (See No. 2.1) MOD USA/1.16/1 98.3-110 kHz Reasons: A primary allocation to the meteorological aids service in 8.3-11.3 kHz will protect the lightning detection systems from users operating under No. 4.4. Interference in the lower portion, i.e. 8.3-9 kHz, is expected to impact the whole system. MOD USA/1.16/2 5.53 Administrations authorizing the use of frequencies below 9 8.3 kHz shall ensure that no harmful interference is caused thereby to the services to which the bands above 98.3 kHz are allocated. Reasons: Consequential to the meteorological aids service primary allocation in the 8.3-9 kHz frequency band. MOD USA/1.16/3 5.54 Administrations conducting scientific research using frequencies below 9 8.3 kHz are
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-447A3_Rcd.pdf
  • Proposal: 3631 ARTICLE 5 Frequency allocations Section IV ­ Table of Frequency Allocations (See No. 2.1) MOD USA/1.16/1 98.3-110 kHz Reasons:A primary allocation to the meteorological aids service in 8.3-11.3 kHz will protect the lightning detection systems from users operating under No. 4.4. Interference in the lower portion, i.e. 8.3-9 kHz, is expected to impact the whole system. MOD USA/1.16/2 5.53 Administrations authorizing the use of frequencies below 9 8.3 kHz shall ensure that no harmful interference is caused thereby to the services to which the bands above 98.3 kHz are allocated. Reasons: Consequential to the meteorological aids service primary allocation in the 8.3-9 kHz frequency band. MOD USA/1.16/3 5.54 Administrations conducting scientific research using frequencies below 9 8.3 kHz are
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • 4.97 01/01/87 06/30/87 2.00 5.12 07/01/87 12/31/87 2.60 5.12 01/01/88 11/30/88 2.60 5.01 12/01/88 03/31/89 3.20 5.01 04/01/89 12/31/89 3.50 4.94 01/01/90 06/30/90 3.48 4.84 07/01/90 12/31/90 3.48 4.83 01/01/91 06/30/91 3.48 4.77 07/01/91 11/27/91 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A18.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A18.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A18.txt
  • playlists with at least ten songs. = 45,451 station-pair distance observations. In 2001, we have 288 stations, so we generate 41,328 station-pair distance observations. We use the distance function to create some simple descriptive statistics. Table 2 shows the average distance between top ten lists among stations within the same R&R format. Table 2 Format 1996 2001 Adult Contemporary 6.51 5.53 Active Rock 6.84 6.02 Adult Alternative 7.65 7.06 Alternative 7.44 6.68 CHR Pop 7.09 6.00 CHR Rhythm 7.66 6.79 Country 4.68 5.94 Hot Adult Contemporary 7.09 6.49 Jazz 8.05 6.39 Rock 7.25 6.94 Urban Adult Contemporary 6.75 7.21 Urban 5.33 6.68 Average Distance Within Formats The first row in Table 2 shows that, on average, Adult Contemporary top 10 radio
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • TELEPHONE COMPANY -6.34 -3.22 -3.23 -12.93 371517 C ARLINGTON TELEPHONE COMPANY -4.80 0.09 -4.88 -17.05 371518 C ELSIE COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 4.02 -2.88 7.10 4.46 371524 C BLAIR TELEPHONE COMPANY 17.27 1.98 14.99 139.51 371525 C THREE RIVER TELCO -0.21 -1.87 1.69 -2.10 371526 C CAMBRIDGE TELEPHONE COMPANY - NE 7.06 -2.82 10.16 21.66 371530 A CONSOLIDATED TELCO, INC. 3.78 -1.66 5.53 6.90 371531 C CLARKS TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO. 4.23 0.41 3.80 3.58 371532 A CONSOLIDATED TELEPHONE COMPANY- NE -1.05 -3.19 2.21 -5.13 371534 C COZAD TELEPHONE COMPANY 69.06 -7.33 82.43 INFINITE 371536 C CURTIS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.46 -2.37 8.01 7.18 371537 C DALTON TEL. CO.,INC. 13.62 -5.67 20.46 18.21 371540 C DILLER TELEPHONE COMPANY -1.06 -0.85 -0.21 -5.70 371542 C EASTERN NEBRASKA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • TELEPHONE COMPANY -6.34 -3.22 -3.23 -12.93 371517 C ARLINGTON TELEPHONE COMPANY -4.80 0.09 -4.88 -17.05 371518 C ELSIE COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 4.02 -2.88 7.10 4.46 371524 C BLAIR TELEPHONE COMPANY 17.27 1.98 14.99 139.51 371525 C THREE RIVER TELCO -0.21 -1.87 1.69 -2.10 371526 C CAMBRIDGE TELEPHONE COMPANY - NE 7.06 -2.82 10.16 21.66 371530 A CONSOLIDATED TELCO, INC. 3.78 -1.66 5.53 6.90 371531 C CLARKS TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO. 4.23 0.41 3.80 3.58 371532 A CONSOLIDATED TELEPHONE COMPANY- NE -1.05 -3.19 2.21 -5.13 371534 C COZAD TELEPHONE COMPANY 69.06 -7.33 82.43 INFINITE 371536 C CURTIS TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.46 -2.37 8.01 7.18 371537 C DALTON TEL. CO.,INC. 13.62 -5.67 20.46 18.21 371540 C DILLER TELEPHONE COMPANY -1.06 -0.85 -0.21 -5.70 371542 C EASTERN NEBRASKA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.txt
  • 4.97 01/01/87 06/30/87 2.00 5.12 07/01/87 12/31/87 2.60 5.12 01/01/88 11/30/88 2.60 5.01 12/01/88 03/31/89 3.20 5.01 04/01/89 12/31/89 3.50 4.94 01/01/90 06/30/90 3.48 4.84 07/01/90 12/31/90 3.48 4.83 01/01/91 06/30/91 3.48 4.77 07/01/91 11/27/91 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/01 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 5.49 5.44 5.97 71 0.72 84 Kentucky 1,204,570 57,566 439,656 6.38 6.82 7.69 138 1.39 163 Louisiana 1,280,111 129,641 510,111 6.50 7.00 7.30 155 1.57 184 Maine 404,942 28,303 160,757 6.45 6.44 6.94 47 0.47 55 Maryland 1,721,613 280,728 1,018,423 5.68 5.68 5.69 206 2.08 244 Massachusetts 1,881,695 235,936 1,033,335 6.44 6.44 6.44 244 2.45 288 Michigan 2,395,793 216,069 1,473,715 5.53 5.57 5.97 279 2.81 330 Minnesota 1,493,043 122,551 647,418 5.42 5.29 6.29 154 1.55 182 Mississippi 761,502 47,159 286,248 6.50 7.00 7.28 88 0.89 105 Missouri 1,880,462 162,243 724,639 5.61 5.60 6.34 193 1.94 228 Montana 333,976 18,254 137,165 6.50 7.00 9.20 43 0.43 51 Nebraska 408,433 22,658 259,573 5.42 5.30 6.25 47 0.48 56 Nevada 768,224 95,524 360,160 4.77
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A3.txt
  • 5.49 5.44 5.97 71 0.72 84 Kentucky 1,204,570 57,566 439,656 6.38 6.82 7.69 138 1.39 163 Louisiana 1,280,111 129,641 510,111 6.50 7.00 7.30 155 1.57 184 Maine 404,942 28,303 160,757 6.45 6.44 6.94 47 0.47 55 Maryland 1,721,613 280,728 1,018,423 5.68 5.68 5.69 206 2.08 244 Massachusetts 1,881,695 235,936 1,033,335 6.44 6.44 6.44 244 2.45 288 Michigan 2,395,793 216,069 1,473,715 5.53 5.57 5.97 279 2.81 330 Minnesota 1,493,043 122,551 647,418 5.42 5.29 6.29 154 1.55 182 Mississippi 761,502 47,159 286,248 6.50 7.00 7.28 88 0.89 105 Missouri 1,880,462 162,243 724,639 5.61 5.60 6.34 193 1.94 228 Montana 333,976 18,254 137,165 6.50 7.00 9.20 43 0.43 51 Nebraska 408,433 22,658 259,573 5.42 5.30 6.25 47 0.48 56 Nevada 768,224 95,524 360,160 4.77
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • -7.83 5.45 1.49 351166 A FARMERS & MERCHANTS MUTUAL TEL. CO. 2.46 -3.13 5.77 8.61 351167 C IOWA TELECOMM. SVCS. DBA IOWA TELECOM-NORTH -4.12 -4.33 0.22 0.00 351168 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOP TEL CO- HARLAN 4.20 -5.22 9.94 17.81 351169 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOP. TEL. CO.-MOULTON -24.65 -34.91 15.77 0.91 351170 C IOWA TELECOMM. SVCS. DBA IOWA TELECOM-SYSTEMS -1.73 -6.88 5.53 0.00 351171 A FARMERS MUTUAL TEL. CO.-JESUP 23.22 -1.85 25.55 INFINITE 351172 A FARMERS MUTUAL TEL. CO.-NORA SPRINGS 4.56 -2.38 7.11 15.03 351173 A FARMERS MUTUAL TEL. COOP.-SHELLSBURG 4.38 -1.22 5.66 9.27 351174 A FARMERS MUTUAL TEL. CO.-STANTON 5.39 -3.23 8.90 19.24 351175 A FARMERS TEL. CO.-BATAVIA 4.54 -4.02 8.92 18.83 351176 A FARMERS TEL. CO.-ESSEX 2.91 -1.62 4.61 4.10
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 4.97 01/01/87 06/30/87 2.00 5.12 07/01/87 12/31/87 2.60 5.12 01/01/88 11/30/88 2.60 5.01 12/01/88 03/31/89 3.20 5.01 04/01/89 12/31/89 3.50 4.94 01/01/90 06/30/90 3.48 4.84 07/01/90 12/31/90 3.48 4.83 01/01/91 06/30/91 3.48 4.77 07/01/91 11/27/91 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/01 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • 4.97 01/01/87 06/30/87 2.00 5.12 07/01/87 12/31/87 2.60 5.12 01/01/88 11/30/88 2.60 5.01 12/01/88 03/31/89 3.20 5.01 04/01/89 12/31/89 3.50 4.94 01/01/90 06/30/90 3.48 4.84 07/01/90 12/31/90 3.48 4.83 01/01/91 06/30/91 3.48 4.77 07/01/91 11/27/91 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 11 16 20 25 New York 3,574,947 10.53 543 755 958 1,191 North Carolina 627,184 1.85 95 132 168 209 North Dakota 68,767 0.20 10 15 18 23 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA Ohio 981,363 2.89 149 207 263 327 Oklahoma 328,505 0.97 50 69 88 109 Oregon 260,065 0.77 40 55 70 87 Pennsylvania 1,877,661 5.53 285 397 503 626 Puerto Rico * 0.49 25 35 45 56 Rhode Island 267,486 0.79 41 56 72 89 South Carolina 290,102 0.85 44 61 78 97 South Dakota 128,053 0.38 19 27 34 43 Tennessee 538,227 1.58 82 114 144 179 Texas 2,332,263 6.87 354 493 625 777 Utah 280,696 0.83 43 59 75 94 Vermont 60,569 0.18
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A3.txt
  • 11 16 20 25 New York 3,574,947 10.53 543 755 958 1,191 North Carolina 627,184 1.85 95 132 168 209 North Dakota 68,767 0.20 10 15 18 23 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA Ohio 981,363 2.89 149 207 263 327 Oklahoma 328,505 0.97 50 69 88 109 Oregon 260,065 0.77 40 55 70 87 Pennsylvania 1,877,661 5.53 285 397 503 626 Puerto Rico * 0.49 25 35 45 56 Rhode Island 267,486 0.79 41 56 72 89 South Carolina 290,102 0.85 44 61 78 97 South Dakota 128,053 0.38 19 27 34 43 Tennessee 538,227 1.58 82 114 144 179 Texas 2,332,263 6.87 354 493 625 777 Utah 280,696 0.83 43 59 75 94 Vermont 60,569 0.18
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name TOTAL ALABAMA 0.71 -3.53 4.40 -9.22 250282 C BLOUNTSVILLE TEL. CO., INC. 0.66 -2.99 3.77 1.31 250283 A BRINDLEE MOUNTAIN TEL. CO. -1.62 -3.22 1.65 0.00 250284 C BUTLER TEL. CO., INC. -1.45 -0.53 -0.92 -12.80 250285 A CASTLEBERRY TEL. CO., INC. 5.53 1.15 4.33 11.13 250286 C NATIONAL TEL. CO. OF AL 3.96 -5.20 9.67 10.67 250290 C FARMERS TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE, INC. 7.36 -3.14 10.84 36.65 250295 C GRACEBA TOTAL COMM. -2.54 -2.48 -0.07 -7.70 250298 C GULF TEL. CO.-AL 5.21 4.43 0.75 -20.55 250299 C HAYNEVILLE TEL. CO., INC. -22.71 -2.63 -20.62 -57.52 250300 C HOPPER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., INC. -0.66 -3.58
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.txt
  • 4.97 01/01/87 06/30/87 2.00 5.12 07/01/87 12/31/87 2.60 5.12 01/01/88 11/30/88 2.60 5.01 12/01/88 03/31/89 3.20 5.01 04/01/89 12/31/89 3.50 4.94 01/01/90 06/30/90 3.48 4.84 07/01/90 12/31/90 3.48 4.83 01/01/91 06/30/91 3.48 4.77 07/01/91 11/27/91 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/01 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • 4.97 01/01/87 06/30/87 2.00 5.12 07/01/87 12/31/87 2.60 5.12 01/01/88 11/30/88 2.60 5.01 12/01/88 03/31/89 3.20 5.01 04/01/89 12/31/89 3.50 4.94 01/01/90 06/30/90 3.48 4.84 07/01/90 12/31/90 3.48 4.83 01/01/91 06/30/91 3.48 4.77 07/01/91 11/27/91 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • 3.50 3.33 0.00 1.75 1.66 8.25 10.00 9.91 8.25 13.50 13.24 Missouri 6.50 8.25 7.32 0.00 3.50 3.49 0.00 1.75 1.75 6.50 10.00 9.06 6.50 13.50 12.56 Montana 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 3.03 0.00 1.75 1.51 8.25 10.00 9.76 8.25 13.50 12.79 Nebraska 6.06 8.25 7.11 0.00 3.50 3.41 0.00 1.75 1.71 6.06 10.00 8.82 6.06 13.50 12.23 Nevada 5.53 8.25 6.25 0.00 3.50 1.89 0.00 1.75 0.94 5.53 10.00 7.19 5.53 13.50 9.08 New Hampshire 8.14 8.25 8.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.14 8.25 8.15 8.14 8.25 8.15 New Jersey 7.07 8.25 8.02 0.00 3.50 3.48 0.00 1.75 1.74 7.07 10.00 9.76 7.07 13.50 13.24 New Mexico 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 3.35 0.00 1.75 1.67 8.25
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A4.pdf
  • 3.50 3.33 0.00 1.75 1.66 8.25 10.00 9.91 8.25 13.50 13.24 Missouri 6.50 8.25 7.32 0.00 3.50 3.49 0.00 1.75 1.75 6.50 10.00 9.06 6.50 13.50 12.56 Montana 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 3.03 0.00 1.75 1.51 8.25 10.00 9.76 8.25 13.50 12.79 Nebraska 6.06 8.25 7.11 0.00 3.50 3.41 0.00 1.75 1.71 6.06 10.00 8.82 6.06 13.50 12.23 Nevada 5.53 8.25 6.25 0.00 3.50 1.89 0.00 1.75 0.94 5.53 10.00 7.19 5.53 13.50 9.08 New Hampshire 8.14 8.25 8.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.14 8.25 8.15 8.14 8.25 8.15 New Jersey 7.07 8.25 8.02 0.00 3.50 3.48 0.00 1.75 1.74 7.07 10.00 9.76 7.07 13.50 13.24 New Mexico 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 3.35 0.00 1.75 1.67 8.25
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • CO. -3.01 -3.54 0.55 -9.33 220380 A PROGRESSIVE RURAL TEL. COOP., INC. -1.04 -1.43 0.39 -16.78 220381 C PUBLIC SERVICE TEL. CO. -7.73 -2.32 -5.55 -12.40 220382 C RINGGOLD TEL. CO. -11.47 -4.56 -7.24 -43.39 220386 C WINDSTREAM STANDARD, INC. -10.13 0.24 -10.34 -100.00 220387 A FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF GEORGIA, LLC -0.40 -2.55 2.20 0.00 220389 A TRENTON TEL. CO. 5.53 0.61 4.89 INFINITE 220392 C WAVERLY HALL TELEPHONE, LLC 6.64 -1.94 8.76 12.46 220394 C WILKES TEL. & ELECTRIC CO. -8.69 -1.84 -6.97 0.00 220395 A WINDSTREAM ACCUCOMM TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. -1.68 -4.15 2.58 -5.82 223036 C GEORGIA WINDSTREAM, INC. -5.59 -2.79 -2.87 0.00 223037 C WINDSTREAM GEORGIA COMMUNICATIONS CORP. -6.57 -4.18 -2.50 0.00 225192 C SOUTHERN BELL-GA -4.89 -6.26 1.46
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.pdf
  • 4.97 01/01/87 06/30/87 2.00 5.12 07/01/87 12/31/87 2.60 5.12 01/01/88 11/30/88 2.60 5.01 12/01/88 03/31/89 3.20 5.01 04/01/89 12/31/89 3.50 4.94 01/01/90 06/30/90 3.48 4.84 07/01/90 12/31/90 3.48 4.83 01/01/91 06/30/91 3.48 4.77 07/01/91 11/27/91 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • 3.50 3.36 0.00 1.75 1.68 8.25 10.00 9.93 8.25 13.50 13.29 Missouri 6.50 8.25 7.34 0.00 3.50 3.45 0.00 1.75 1.72 6.50 10.00 9.06 6.50 13.50 12.51 Montana 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 2.85 0.00 1.75 1.43 8.25 10.00 9.68 8.25 13.50 12.53 Nebraska 6.06 8.25 7.03 0.00 3.50 3.39 0.00 1.75 1.70 6.06 10.00 8.72 6.06 13.50 12.12 Nevada 5.53 8.25 6.30 0.00 3.50 1.86 0.00 1.75 0.93 5.53 10.00 7.23 5.53 13.50 9.09 New Hampshire 8.14 8.25 8.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.14 8.25 8.16 8.14 8.25 8.16 New Jersey 7.07 8.25 8.03 0.00 3.50 3.48 0.00 1.75 1.74 7.07 10.00 9.77 7.07 13.50 13.25 New Mexico 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 3.08 0.00 1.75 1.54 8.25
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A4.txt
  • 3.50 3.36 0.00 1.75 1.68 8.25 10.00 9.93 8.25 13.50 13.29 Missouri 6.50 8.25 7.34 0.00 3.50 3.45 0.00 1.75 1.72 6.50 10.00 9.06 6.50 13.50 12.51 Montana 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 2.85 0.00 1.75 1.43 8.25 10.00 9.68 8.25 13.50 12.53 Nebraska 6.06 8.25 7.03 0.00 3.50 3.39 0.00 1.75 1.70 6.06 10.00 8.72 6.06 13.50 12.12 Nevada 5.53 8.25 6.30 0.00 3.50 1.86 0.00 1.75 0.93 5.53 10.00 7.23 5.53 13.50 9.09 New Hampshire 8.14 8.25 8.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.14 8.25 8.16 8.14 8.25 8.16 New Jersey 7.07 8.25 8.03 0.00 3.50 3.48 0.00 1.75 1.74 7.07 10.00 9.77 7.07 13.50 13.25 New Mexico 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 3.08 0.00 1.75 1.54 8.25
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • -0.57 -31.75 310704 C ACE TEL. CO. OF MI, INC. 7.08 -5.11 12.85 24.23 310705 C CENTURY TELEPHONE OF NORTHERN MICHIGAN, INC. -4.81 -5.36 0.59 -20.03 310708 C LENNON TEL. CO. 1.80 -5.73 7.98 3.64 310711 C MIDWAY TEL. CO. -5.44 -4.32 -1.17 -11.89 310713 C HIAWATHA TELEPHONE COMPANY 0.82 -11.86 14.38 36.83 310714 C OGDEN TEL. CO. -2.83 -7.93 5.53 -2.63 310717 C ONTONAGON COUNTY TEL. CO. 0.44 -2.65 3.18 -100.00 310720 C PENINSULA TEL. CO.-MI -7.08 -4.69 -2.50 -100.00 310721 C PIGEON TEL. CO. 14.88 -5.40 21.44 41.88 310725 A SAND CREEK TEL. CO. -4.72 -8.60 4.25 -17.25 310726 C SHIAWASSEE TEL. CO. -2.00 -7.23 5.63 -1.31 310728 C SPRINGPORT TEL. CO. -8.02 -7.04 -1.06 -18.12 310732 C UPPER
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.txt
  • 4.97 01/01/87 06/30/87 2.00 5.12 07/01/87 12/31/87 2.60 5.12 01/01/88 11/30/88 2.60 5.01 12/01/88 03/31/89 3.20 5.01 04/01/89 12/31/89 3.50 4.94 01/01/90 06/30/90 3.48 4.84 07/01/90 12/31/90 3.48 4.83 01/01/91 06/30/91 3.48 4.77 07/01/91 11/27/91 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296912A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296912A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296912A1.txt
  • the same constructive and positive bipartisan spirit, which existed at that time, in any future proceedings. Since 2007, I have said that any USF reform must accomplish five basic objectives. The Commission must: (1) contain the growth of the Fund; (2) broaden the base of contributors; (3) reduce the contribution burden (By the way, the contribution factor has grown from 5.53 percent during the first quarter of 1998 to currently a level of 15.3 percent, which is an historic high. This confiscatory money grab not only burdens America's consumers the most, it is evidence that the Fund's viability is in question.); (4) ensure competitive neutrality; and (5) eliminate waste, fraud and other abuses of the system. All of this should be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297139A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297139A1.txt
  • in any future proceedings. For several years, I have said that any USF reform must accomplish five basic objectives. The Commission must: (1) contain the growth of the Fund; (2) in a limited and fiscally sound manner, explore the possibility of broadening the base of contributors; (3) reduce the contribution burden (By the way, the contribution factor has grown from 5.53 percent during the first quarter of 1998 to currently a level of 15.3 percent, which is an historic high. This confiscatory money grab not only burdens America's consumers the most, it is evidence that the Fund's viability is in question.); (4) ensure competitive neutrality; and (5) eliminate waste, fraud and other abuses of the system. Such comprehensive reform ­ which
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.txt
  • 4.97 01/01/87 06/30/87 2.00 5.12 07/01/87 12/31/87 2.60 5.12 01/01/88 11/30/88 2.60 5.01 12/01/88 03/31/89 3.20 5.01 04/01/89 12/31/89 3.50 4.94 01/01/90 06/30/90 3.48 4.84 07/01/90 12/31/90 3.48 4.83 01/01/91 06/30/91 3.48 4.77 07/01/91 11/27/91 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
  • A CIRCLE TEL & ELEC 87.74 48.89 26.10 162.62 613006 C COPPER VALLEY TEL 8.05 -3.67 12.17 9.04 613007 C CORDOVA TEL COOP 4.69 -0.85 5.59 3.33 613008 C ACS-FAIRBANKS, INC. -16.80 -8.60 -8.97 -100.00 613010 C ACS-N GLACIER STATE -6.11 -6.75 0.69 -23.63 613011 C INTERIOR TEL CO INC -11.53 -7.19 -4.67 -20.78 613011A C INTERIOR TEL CO INC -5.53 -14.21 10.12 2.12 613012 C ACS-AK JUNEAU -10.34 -8.39 -2.13 0.00 613013 C KETCHIKAN PUBLIC UT 3.91 -5.64 10.12 6.97 613015 C MATANUSKA TEL ASSOC -5.63 -7.85 2.41 -15.16 613016 C MUKLUK TEL CO INC 3.18 -7.31 11.31 6.47 613016A C MUKLUK TEL CO INC -5.29 -13.70 9.75 0.00 613017 C ALASKA TEL CO 1.76 -1.53 3.34 -5.84 613017A C
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.txt
  • A CIRCLE TEL & ELEC 87.74 48.89 26.10 162.62 613006 C COPPER VALLEY TEL 8.05 -3.67 12.17 9.04 613007 C CORDOVA TEL COOP 4.69 -0.85 5.59 3.33 613008 C ACS-FAIRBANKS, INC. -16.80 -8.60 -8.97 -100.00 613010 C ACS-N GLACIER STATE -6.11 -6.75 0.69 -23.63 613011 C INTERIOR TEL CO INC -11.53 -7.19 -4.67 -20.78 613011A C INTERIOR TEL CO INC -5.53 -14.21 10.12 2.12 613012 C ACS-AK JUNEAU -10.34 -8.39 -2.13 0.00 613013 C KETCHIKAN PUBLIC UT 3.91 -5.64 10.12 6.97 613015 C MATANUSKA TEL ASSOC -5.63 -7.85 2.41 -15.16 613016 C MUKLUK TEL CO INC 3.18 -7.31 11.31 6.47 613016A C MUKLUK TEL CO INC -5.29 -13.70 9.75 0.00 613017 C ALASKA TEL CO 1.76 -1.53 3.34 -5.84 613017A C
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A9.txt
  • 4.97 01/01/87 06/30/87 2.00 5.12 07/01/87 12/31/87 2.60 5.12 01/01/88 11/30/88 2.60 5.01 12/01/88 03/31/89 3.20 5.01 04/01/89 12/31/89 3.50 4.94 01/01/90 06/30/90 3.48 4.84 07/01/90 12/31/90 3.48 4.83 01/01/91 06/30/91 3.48 4.77 07/01/91 11/27/91 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304535A3.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304535A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304535A3.txt
  • journey. As I have said since I first arrived here at the Commission, the universal service fund's growth, from $4.9 billion in 2000 to over $8 billion, is troubling. Equally problematic has been the unbridled growth of the contribution factor. In its early stages in 1998, this ``tax'' to support the fund, which is derived ultimately from consumers, stood at 5.53 percent of interstate revenues. Today, that ``tax rate'' skyrocketed to an all time high of more than fifteen percent last year. As with many government programs in general, the trends on both the spending and the taxing sides of this equation are simply unsustainable. As a 21st century program, the universal service fund should evolve away from subsidizing inefficient 20th
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.txt
  • 4.97 01/01/87 06/30/87 2.00 5.12 07/01/87 12/31/87 2.60 5.12 01/01/88 11/30/88 2.60 5.01 12/01/88 03/31/89 3.20 5.01 04/01/89 12/31/89 3.50 4.94 01/01/90 06/30/90 3.48 4.84 07/01/90 12/31/90 3.48 4.83 01/01/91 06/30/91 3.48 4.77 07/01/91 11/27/91 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-27A1.txt
  • US282, US283, US298, US321, and US340; remove footnotes US235, US236, and US238; and add footnotes USwww, USxxx, USyyy and USzzz. The additions and revisions read as follows: § 2.106 Table of Frequency Allocations. 0-130 kHz (VLF/LF) Page 1 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government Below 9 (Not Allocated) S5.53 S5.54 Below 9 (Not Allocated) S5.53 S5.54 9-14 RADIONAVIGATION 9-14 RADIONAVIGATION US18 US294 14-19.95 FIXED MARITIME MOBILE S5.57 S5.55 S5.56 14-19.95 FIXED MARITIME MOBILE S5.57 US294 14-19.95 Fixed US294 19.95-20.05 STANDARD FREQUENCY AND TIME SIGNAL (20 kHz) 19.95-20.05 STANDARD FREQUENCY AND TIME SIGNAL (20 kHz) US294 20.05-70 FIXED MARITIME MOBILE S5.57 20.05-59 FIXED MARITIME MOBILE S5.57 US294 20.05-59 FIXED US294
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.txt
  • tbd 2.61 tbd 11 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital Line Sharing - Conditioned 4.17 0.00 0.0023.08 4.17 0.00 0.0020.00 0.00 0.00 d 11 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital Line Sharing - Non Conditioned 0.15 1.31 0.02 1.08 0.15 0.89 0.20 0.83 0.12 0.83 11 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital IDSL capable 3.74 5.29 4.73 9.66 4.37 6.05 3.96 4.29 2.91 5.53 11 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital ISDN capable 0.00 5.29 0.00 9.66 0.00 6.05 4.29 0.00 5.53abcde 11 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital xDSL capable 0.94 n/a 0.50 n/a 0.78 n/a 0.30 n/a 0.53 5.00 11 UNE Loop 2/4 wire analog 8db and 5.5db loop 0.23 4.74 0.32 5.18 0.17 4.56 0.38 4.06 0.37 4.36 11 UNE Loop 4 wire
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.txt
  • 50 Metric Metric Name [SQM Number] May June July August September Number and Disaggregation BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC Notes Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-331 Tennessee Performance Metric Data F.5.1 Region (seconds) 64.68 25.99 52.80 28.04 84.66 27.23 53.70 24.35 66.71 26.57 General - Operator Services (Toll) Average Speed to Answer F.6.1 TN (seconds) 6.00 5.53 5.51 4.26 4.42 % Answered in 10 seconds F.6.2 TN (%) 76.80% 78.80% 78.60% 84.20% 83.30% General - Directory Assistance Average Speed to Answer F.7.1 TN (seconds) 5.06 4.54 3.83 4.42 4.69 % Answered in 10 seconds F.7.2 TN (%) 83.50% 86.10% 89.70% 86.60% 85.60% General - Billing Usage Data Delivery Accuracy F.9.1 Region (%) 95.22%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%99.70%99.34%99.92%100.00% Usage Data Delivery Timeliness
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-39A1.txt
  • US281, US282, US283, US298, US321, US340, and US342; remove footnotes US235 and US236; and add footnotes US364, US366, and US367. The additions and revisions read as follows: § 2.106 Table of Frequency Allocations. 0-130 kHz (VLF/LF) Page 1 International Table United States Table FCC Rule Part(s) Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Federal Government Non-Federal Government Below 9 (Not Allocated) 5.53 5.54 Below 9 (Not Allocated) 5.53 5.54 9-14 RADIONAVIGATION 9-14 RADIONAVIGATION US18 US294 14-19.95 FIXED MARITIME MOBILE 5.57 5.55 5.56 14-19.95 FIXED MARITIME MOBILE 5.57 US294 14-19.95 Fixed US294 19.95-20.05 STANDARD FREQUENCY AND TIME SIGNAL (20 kHz) 19.95-20.05 STANDARD FREQUENCY AND TIME SIGNAL (20 kHz) US294 20.05-70 FIXED MARITIME MOBILE 5.57 20.05-59 FIXED MARITIME MOBILE 5.57 US294 20.05-59 FIXED US294
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • Table are exactly the same for a shared band, the line between columns 4 and 5 is deleted and the allocations are shown once. (3) The Federal Table, given in column 4, is included for informational purposes only. * * * * * (5) * * * (i) Any footnote consisting of ``5.'' followed by one or more digits, e.g., 5.53, denotes an international footnote. Where an international footnote is applicable, without modification, to both Federal and non-Federal operations, the Commission places the footnote in both the Federal Table and the non-Federal Table (columns 4 and 5) and the international footnote is binding on both Federal users and non-Federal licensees. If, however, an international footnote pertains to a service allocated only
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-179A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-179A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-179A1.txt
  • 0.72 0.25 0.56 0.66 Prior year (1/1/04) $6.92 $6.92 $6.94 $6.94 $7.29 $5.97 $7.19 $6.40 $7.75 CableCARD $1.09 $1.04 $1.63 $1.93 $1.45 $3.25 $1.61 $1.09 $1.64 Standard error 0.07 0.07 0.13 0.18 0.09 0.41 0.04 0.20 0.08 Non-Recurring Cable TV Installation Charges Unwired home $45.94 $45.98 $45.47 $44.55 $44.05 $45.94 $44.59 $49.42 $40.93 Standard error 0.76 0.64 1.95 2.62 1.58 5.53 1.15 1.76 3.96 Prior year (1/1/04) $45.34 $45.34 $45.36 $44.92 $44.78 $45.30 $45.27 $47.19 $39.21 Pre-wired home $32.22 $32.23 $32.14 $30.46 $30.07 $31.58 $33.17 $33.37 $33.89 Standard error 0.67 0.57 1.64 1.90 1.20 3.87 1.02 1.93 3.78 Prior year (1/1/04) $31.61 $31.53 $32.38 $31.30 $31.40 $31.04 $33.93 $31.83 $32.00 Service reconnection $28.81 $28.80 $28.85 $24.73 $24.41 $25.60 $29.75 $35.53 $26
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-77A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-77A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-77A1.txt
  • a Commission licensee subject to section 310(b) of the Act, TerreStar should have internal procedures in place to monitor the citizenship and principal places of business of investors acquiring its shares in public markets. Equity and Voting Interests Held By Other Non-U.S. SkyTerra Shareholders and Other Limited Partners of MSV LP: Other non-U.S. shareholders of SkyTerra hold 1.77 percent and 5.53 percent of its equity and voting interests, respectively. We therefore calculate that these other non-U.S. SkyTerra shareholders hold indirectly a 1.76 percent equity interest (1.77% x 99.29%) and 5.53 percent voting interest (5.53% x 100%) in MSV LP. Limited partners of MSV LP other than SkyTerra, which are not named for the record, hold 0.71 percent of MSV LP's equity
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-197A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-197A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-197A1.txt
  • managed the expanded privileges associated with the license. We also propose to afford institutions much greater flexibility in choosing the frequency band(s) and technical characteristics associated with individual tests and experiments conducted under the authority of a research program experimental radio license. We recognize that some types of experiments have added filing requirements under our existing rules. For example, Section 5.53(c) requires the submission of an environmental assessment in certain cases, Section 5.63(e) requires applicants for an experimental authorization involving a satellite system not already authorized by the Commission to submit information regarding orbital debris mitigation plans, and Section 5.63(a) sets forth procedures for requesting non-disclosure of proprietary information. These rules serve important legal and public interest purposes, and cannot be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-58A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-58A1.txt
  • toward badly needed Universal Service reform. USF is America's largest telecommunications subsidy program, which redistributes nearly $9 billion per year. If we have been able to agree on only one thing at the FCC, it is that the Universal Service subsidy system is antiquated, arcane, inefficient and just downright broken. For instance, since 1998 the contribution factor has increased from 5.53 percent to more than 15 percent today. Positive and constructive change must happen as soon as possible. In November of 2008, the Commission came close to a bi-partisan, groundbreaking agreement to resolve many of the most vexing challenges facing not only Universal Service but intercarrier compensation as well. Unfortunately, needless roadblocks were thrown in our way. But today we have
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-58A4.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-58A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-58A4.txt
  • toward badly needed Universal Service reform. USF is America's largest telecommunications subsidy program, which redistributes nearly $9 billion per year. If we have been able to agree on only one thing at the FCC, it is that the Universal Service subsidy system is antiquated, arcane, inefficient and just downright broken. For instance, since 1998 the contribution factor has increased from 5.53 percent to more than 15 percent today. Positive and constructive change must happen as soon as possible. In November of 2008, the Commission came close to a bi-partisan, groundbreaking agreement to resolve many of the most vexing challenges facing not only Universal Service but intercarrier compensation as well. Unfortunately, needless roadblocks were thrown in our way. But today we have
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-13A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-13A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-13A1.txt
  • journey. As I have said since I first arrived here at the Commission, the universal service fund's growth, from $4.9 billion in 2000 to over $8 billion, is troubling. Equally problematic has been the unbridled growth of the contribution factor. In its early stages in 1998, this ``tax'' to support the fund, which is derived ultimately from consumers, stood at 5.53 percent of interstate revenues. Today, that ``tax rate'' skyrocketed to an all time high of more than fifteen percent last year. As with many government programs in general, the trends on both the spending and the taxing sides of this equation are simply unsustainable. As a 21st century program, the universal service fund should evolve away from subsidizing inefficient 20th
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-13A4.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-13A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-13A4.txt
  • journey. As I have said since I first arrived here at the Commission, the universal service fund's growth, from $4.9 billion in 2000 to over $8 billion, is troubling. Equally problematic has been the unbridled growth of the contribution factor. In its early stages in 1998, this ``tax'' to support the fund, which is derived ultimately from consumers, stood at 5.53 percent of interstate revenues. Today, that ``tax rate'' skyrocketed to an all time high of more than fifteen percent last year. As with many government programs in general, the trends on both the spending and the taxing sides of this equation are simply unsustainable. As a 21st century program, the universal service fund should evolve away from subsidizing inefficient 20th
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Reports/fcc98091.pdf
  • 38 106.34 43 7.34 38 McLeod, Inc. 7.09 7.09 39 70.92 47 7.09 39 Puerto Rico Telephone 3.52 3.52 7.04 40 123.27 41 3.52 50 Chase Telecom (PK) 6.54 6.54 41 196.17 31 6.54 40 Atlantic Cellular Company 1.00 5.03 6.03 42 75.29 45 6.03 41 Dobson Comm. (SEC) 1.41 4.20 5.61 43 77.22 44 5.61 42 Southern New Eng. 5.53 5.53 44 138.13 36 5.53 43 Pricellular Corporation 5.10 5.10 45 127.38 39 5.10 44 ACC-PCS (PK) 5.04 5.04 46 50.42 49 5.04 45 Poka Lambro (PK) 0.06 1.34 3.29 4.69 47 74.67 46 4.69 46 DCC PCS (PK) 4.49 4.49 48 44.85 50 4.49 47 US Unwired 1.29 0.47 2.44 4.21 49 70.85 48 3.99 48 Texas Utilities 3.96
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-109A1.html
  • Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission ("Bureau") and DRS Technologies, Inc. ("DRS Technologies"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau into whether DRS Technologies complied with sections 301 and 310(d) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and with sections 1.948, 5.53(a), 5.59(d), and 25.119 of the Commission's rules ("Rules"), relating to several transactions completed by DRS Technologies and its wholly-owned subsidiary companies between April 1, 2008 and January 1, 2010, and to DRS Technologies' operation of certain experimental radio facilities. 2. The Bureau and DRS Technologies have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/materials/already-released/radiomarket090002.pdf
  • generate =3011ii = 45,451 station-pair distance observations. In 2001, we have 288 stations, so we generate 41,328 station-pair distance observations. We use the distance function to create some simple descriptive statistics. Table 2 shows the average distance between top ten lists among stations within the same R&R format. Table 2 Average Distance Within Formats Format 1996 2001 Adult Contemporary 6.51 5.53 Active Rock 6.84 6.02 Adult Alternative 7.65 7.06 Alternative 7.44 6.68 CHR Pop 7.09 6.00 CHR Rhythm 7.66 6.79 Country 4.68 5.94 Hot Adult Contemporary 7.09 6.49 Jazz 8.05 6.39 Rock 7.25 6.94 Urban Adult Contemporary 6.75 7.21 Urban 5.33 6.68 11 The first row in Table 2 shows that, on average, Adult Contemporary top 10 radio lists differ by
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-b.pdf
  • (Oct 1956) pp. 416-424. Wildman, Steven S. and Theomary Karamanis, "The Economics of Minority Programming." Paper presented at 1997 Aspen Institute Forum, "Delivering on Diversity: New Approaches to Marketing Minority Programming." November 1997. 35 Table 1a: Summary Statistics, 1997 All MarketsMarkets with Black Data Markets with Hispanic Data Formats 14.80 16.31 16.84 Stations Total 24.48 26.65 29.33 Youth-Targeted 5.56 6.48 5.53 Middle-Age-Targeted 14.12 15.32 17.96 Older-Targeted 4.80 4.85 5.84 White-Targeted 22.55 22.62 27.96 Black (non-white)-Targeted 1.92 4.03 1.37 Hispanic-Targeted 1.07 0.78 4.65 Non-Hispanic Targeted 23.41 25.87 24.69 AQH Listening (%) Total 15.77 15.98 16.36 White (Non-Black) 15.44 Black 17.88 Non-Hispanic 15.80 Hispanic 17.50 Population (millions) Total 0.70 1.16 1.62 White (Non-Black) 0.63 0.97 Black 0.08 0.19 Non-Hispanic 1.28 Hispanic 0.07 0.11
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/data/papersAndStudies/fcc98091.pdf
  • 38 106.34 43 7.34 38 McLeod, Inc. 7.09 7.09 39 70.92 47 7.09 39 Puerto Rico Telephone 3.52 3.52 7.04 40 123.27 41 3.52 50 Chase Telecom (PK) 6.54 6.54 41 196.17 31 6.54 40 Atlantic Cellular Company 1.00 5.03 6.03 42 75.29 45 6.03 41 Dobson Comm. (SEC) 1.41 4.20 5.61 43 77.22 44 5.61 42 Southern New Eng. 5.53 5.53 44 138.13 36 5.53 43 Pricellular Corporation 5.10 5.10 45 127.38 39 5.10 44 ACC-PCS (PK) 5.04 5.04 46 50.42 49 5.04 45 Poka Lambro (PK) 0.06 1.34 3.29 4.69 47 74.67 46 4.69 46 DCC PCS (PK) 4.49 4.49 48 44.85 50 4.49 47 US Unwired 1.29 0.47 2.44 4.21 49 70.85 48 3.99 48 Texas Utilities 3.96
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2002/fcc02331.pdf
  • 50 Metric Metric Name [SQM Number] May June July August September Number and Disaggregation BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC Notes Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-331 Tennessee Performance Metric Data F.5.1 Region (seconds) 64.68 25.99 52.80 28.04 84.66 27.23 53.70 24.35 66.71 26.57 General - Operator Services (Toll) Average Speed to Answer F.6.1 TN (seconds) 6.00 5.53 5.51 4.26 4.42 % Answered in 10 seconds F.6.2 TN (%) 76.80% 78.80% 78.60% 84.20% 83.30% General - Directory Assistance Average Speed to Answer F.7.1 TN (seconds) 5.06 4.54 3.83 4.42 4.69 % Answered in 10 seconds F.7.2 TN (%) 83.50% 86.10% 89.70% 86.60% 85.60% General - Billing Usage Data Delivery Accuracy F.9.1 Region (%) 95.22%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%99.70%99.34%99.92%100.00% Usage Data Delivery Timeliness
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • 5 3 5 3 5 3 5 3 5 4 5 4 5 4 54 Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service $20.38 $20.48 $19.81 $19.38 $19.98 $19.81 $20.16 $20.13 $21.10 $20.41 $20.49 $20.17 $20.44 200 Five-Minute, Business-Day, Same-Zone Calls 16.01 16.10 16.88 17.45 17.86 17.66 17.36 17.40 17.33 17.39 17.69 18.09 17.78 Subscriber Line Charges 4.78 4.88 4.74 4.67 5.24 5.35 5.53 5.46 5.61 6.17 6.83 6.85 6.59 Extra for Touch-Tone Service 2.77 2.59 1.99 1.86 1.70 1.24 1.00 0.86 0.36 0.27 0.19 0.13 0.13 Taxes, including 911 and other Charges 4.93 5.10 4.91 5.05 5.20 5.18 5.35 5.55 5.70 6.08 5.95 5.91 5.80 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service $48.87 $49.14 $48.33 $48.41 $49.98 $49.24 $49.40 $49.40 $50.10 $50.32 $51.1 5
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 56 54 54 54 53 53 53 53 54 54 54 54 54 Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service $20.38 $20.48 $19.81 $19.38 $19.98 $19.81 $20.16 $20.13 $21.10 $20.41 $20.49 $20.17 $20.76 $21.13 200 Five-Minute, Business-Day, Same-Zone Calls 16.01 16.10 16.88 17.45 17.86 17.66 17.36 17.40 17.33 17.39 17.69 18.09 19.07 18.05 Subscriber Line Charges 4.78 4.88 4.74 4.67 5.24 5.35 5.53 5.46 5.61 6.17 8.63 6.85 6.63 6.34 Extra for Touch-Tone Service 2.77 2.59 1.99 1.86 1.70 1.24 1.00 0.86 0.36 0.27 0.19 0.13 0.12 0.07 Taxes, including 911 and other Charges 4.93 5.10 4.91 5.05 5.20 5.18 5.35 5.55 5.70 6.08 5.95 5.91 6.06 6.53 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service $48.87 $49.14 $48.33 $48.41 $49.98 $49.24 $49.40 $49.40 $50.10
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • 58.48 58.64 59.60 59.14 59.70 59.55 60.02 Number of Sample Cities with Flat-rate Service 59 56 54 54 54 53 53 53 53 Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service $20.38 $20.48 $19.81 $19.38 $19.98 $19.81 $20.16 $20.13 $21.15 200 Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Calls 16.01 16.10 16.88 17.45 17.86 17.66 17.36 17.40 17.12 Subscriber Line Charges 4.78 4.88 4.74 4.67 5.24 5.35 5.53 5.46 5.59 Extra for Touch-tone 2.77 2.59 1.99 1.86 1.70 1.24 1.00 0.86 0.43 Taxes including 911 Charges 4.93 5.10 4.91 5.05 5.20 5.18 5.35 5.55 5.70 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 48.87 49.14 48.33 48.41 49.98 49.24 49.40 49.40 49.98 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 77 77 78 78 80 81 81 79 79 Cost of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 59.70 59.55 59.11 60.39 Number of Sample Cities with Flat-rate Service 59 56 54 54 54 53 53 53 53 54 Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service $20.38 $20.48 $19.81 $19.38 $19.98 $19.81 $20.16 $20.13 $21.10 $20.41 200 Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Calls 16.01 16.10 16.88 17.45 17.86 17.66 17.36 17.40 17.33 17.39 Subscriber Line Charges 4.78 4.88 4.74 4.67 5.24 5.35 5.53 5.46 5.61 6.17 Extra for Touch-tone 2.77 2.59 1.99 1.86 1.70 1.24 1.00 0.86 0.36 0.27 Other 4.93 5.10 4.91 5.05 5.20 5.18 5.35 5.55 5.70 6.08 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 48.87 49.14 48.33 48.41 49.98 49.24 49.40 49.40 50.10 50.32 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 77 77 78 78 80 81 81 79 77 80
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend100.pdf
  • 4.97 01/01/87 06/30/87 2.00 5.12 07/01/87 12/31/87 2.60 5.12 01/01/88 11/30/88 2.60 5.01 12/01/88 03/31/89 3.20 5.01 04/01/89 12/31/89 3.50 4.94 01/01/90 06/30/90 3.48 4.84 07/01/90 12/31/90 3.48 4.83 01/01/91 06/30/91 3.48 4.77 07/01/91 11/27/91 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. *
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend199.pdf
  • 4.97 01/01/87 06/30/87 2.00 5.12 07/01/87 12/31/87 2.60 5.12 01/01/88 11/30/88 2.60 5.01 12/01/88 03/31/89 3.20 5.01 04/01/89 12/31/89 3.50 4.94 01/01/90 06/30/90 3.48 4.84 07/01/90 12/31/90 3.48 4.83 01/01/91 06/30/91 3.48 4.77 07/01/91 11/27/91 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 SOURCE: INDUSTRY ANALYSIS DIVISION, MONITORING REPORT AND ACCESS TARIFF FILINGS. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • 4.97 01/01/87 06/30/87 2.00 5.12 07/01/87 12/31/87 2.60 5.12 01/01/88 11/30/88 2.60 5.01 12/01/88 03/31/89 3.20 5.01 04/01/89 12/31/89 3.50 4.94 01/01/90 06/30/90 3.48 4.84 07/01/90 12/31/90 3.48 4.83 01/01/91 06/30/91 3.48 4.77 07/01/91 11/27/91 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 12/31/004/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 Source: Industry
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend298.pdf
  • 4.97 01/01/87 06/30/87 2.00 5.12 07/01/87 12/31/87 2.60 5.12 01/01/88 11/30/88 2.60 5.01 12/01/88 03/31/89 3.20 5.01 04/01/89 12/31/89 3.50 4.94 01/01/90 06/30/90 3.48 4.84 07/01/90 12/31/90 3.48 4.83 01/01/91 06/30/91 3.48 4.77 07/01/91 11/27/91 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 4.98 6.92 0.49 1.50 2.52 0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 SOURCE: FEDERAL-STATE JOINT BOARD MONITORING REPORT, MAY 1997, AND ANNUAL FILINGS MADE EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 1997, JANUARY 1, 1998, AND JULY 1, 1998. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend299.pdf
  • 4.97 01/01/87 06/30/87 2.00 5.12 07/01/87 12/31/87 2.60 5.12 01/01/88 11/30/88 2.60 5.01 12/01/88 03/31/89 3.20 5.01 04/01/89 12/31/89 3.50 4.94 01/01/90 06/30/90 3.48 4.84 07/01/90 12/31/90 3.48 4.83 01/01/91 06/30/91 3.48 4.77 07/01/91 11/27/91 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines)
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
  • 4.97 01/01/87 06/30/87 2.00 5.12 07/01/87 12/31/87 2.60 5.12 01/01/88 11/30/88 2.60 5.01 12/01/88 03/31/89 3.20 5.01 04/01/89 12/31/89 3.50 4.94 01/01/90 06/30/90 3.48 4.84 07/01/90 12/31/90 3.48 4.83 01/01/91 06/30/91 3.48 4.77 07/01/91 11/27/91 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • 4.97 01/01/87 06/30/87 2.00 5.12 07/01/87 12/31/87 2.60 5.12 01/01/88 11/30/88 2.60 5.01 12/01/88 03/31/89 3.20 5.01 04/01/89 12/31/89 3.50 4.94 01/01/90 06/30/90 3.48 4.84 07/01/90 12/31/90 3.48 4.83 01/01/91 06/30/91 3.48 4.77 07/01/91 11/27/91 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • 4.97 01/01/87 06/30/87 2.00 5.12 07/01/87 12/31/87 2.60 5.12 01/01/88 11/30/88 2.60 5.01 12/01/88 03/31/89 3.20 5.01 04/01/89 12/31/89 3.50 4.94 01/01/90 06/30/90 3.48 4.84 07/01/90 12/31/90 3.48 4.83 01/01/91 06/30/91 3.48 4.77 07/01/91 11/27/91 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
  • 4.97 01/01/87 06/30/87 2.00 5.12 07/01/87 12/31/87 2.60 5.12 01/01/88 11/30/88 2.60 5.01 12/01/88 03/31/89 3.20 5.01 04/01/89 12/31/89 3.50 4.94 01/01/90 06/30/90 3.48 4.84 07/01/90 12/31/90 3.48 4.83 01/01/91 06/30/91 3.48 4.77 07/01/91 11/27/91 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014/ 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • 4.97 01/01/87 06/30/87 2.00 5.12 07/01/87 12/31/87 2.60 5.12 01/01/88 11/30/88 2.60 5.01 12/01/88 03/31/89 3.20 5.01 04/01/89 12/31/89 3.50 4.94 01/01/90 06/30/90 3.48 4.84 07/01/90 12/31/90 3.48 4.83 01/01/91 06/30/91 3.48 4.77 07/01/91 11/27/91 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/014 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd98.pdf
  • 2.90 5.96 3.58 1986 3.63 2.19 4.12 2.46 6.32 3.79 6.92 4.16 4.82 2.90 5.96 3.58 1987 3.63 2.19 4.12 2.46 6.32 3.79 6.92 4.16 4.82 2.90 5.96 3.58 1988 3.63 2.19 4.12 2.46 6.32 3.79 6.92 4.16 4.82 2.90 5.96 3.58 1989 3.49 2.18 4.12 2.46 6.32 3.79 6.92 4.16 4.82 2.90 5.96 3.58 1990 3.32 2.18 3.95 2.45 5.53 3.78 6.05 4.00 4.61 2.89 5.38 3.58 1991 3.32 2.18 3.95 2.45 5.53 3.78 6.05 4.00 4.61 2.89 5.38 3.58 1992 3.32 2.18 3.95 2.45 5.53 3.78 6.05 4.00 4.61 2.89 5.38 3.58 1993 3.36 2.22 3.95 2.53 5.53 3.78 6.47 4.30 5.07 3.31 5.66 3.68 1994 3.36 2.22 3.95 2.66 5.35 3.10 6.79 3.74 5.21 3.72 6.76 3.87 1995
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd99.pdf
  • 2.90 5.96 3.58 1986 3.63 2.19 4.12 2.46 6.32 3.79 6.92 4.16 4.82 2.90 5.96 3.58 1987 3.63 2.19 4.12 2.46 6.32 3.79 6.92 4.16 4.82 2.90 5.96 3.58 1988 3.63 2.19 4.12 2.46 6.32 3.79 6.92 4.16 4.82 2.90 5.96 3.58 1989 3.49 2.18 4.12 2.46 6.32 3.79 6.92 4.16 4.82 2.90 5.96 3.58 1990 3.32 2.18 3.95 2.45 5.53 3.78 6.05 4.00 4.61 2.89 5.38 3.58 1991 3.32 2.18 3.95 2.45 5.53 3.78 6.05 4.00 4.61 2.89 5.38 3.58 1992 3.32 2.18 3.95 2.45 5.53 3.78 6.05 4.00 4.61 2.89 5.38 3.58 1993 3.36 2.22 3.95 2.53 5.53 3.78 6.47 4.30 5.07 3.31 5.66 3.68 1994 3.36 2.22 3.95 2.66 5.35 3.10 6.79 3.74 5.21 3.72 6.76 3.87 1995
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • 13.51 0.00 150113 C ALLTEL NY INC.-RED JACKET 1.30 0.54 0.76 0.00 150114 C ORISKANY FALLS TEL. CORP. -8.71 1.37 -9.94 0.00 150116 C PATTERSONVILLE TEL. CO.-NY -2.23 -0.89 -1.36 -18.58 150118 C PORT BYRON TEL. CO. -6.10 -0.03 -6.07 -28.91 150121 C FRONTIER TELEPHONE OF ROCHESTER, INC. 1.64 -23.87 33.51 0.00 150122 C FRONTIER COMM. OF SENECA GORHAM, INC. -5.53 -1.41 -4.18 -100.00 150125 A STATE TEL. CO. 10.73 0.66 10.01 0.00 150128 C FRONTIER COMM. OF SYLVAN LAKE, INC. 3.45 1.54 1.89 0.00 150129 C TOWNSHIP TEL. CO., INC. 12.96 0.73 12.15 48.91 150131 C TRUMANSBURG TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. 9.23 0.04 9.18 29.83 150133 C VERNON TEL. CO., INC. 3.65 0.89 2.74 0.00 150135 C WARWICK VALLEY TEL. CO.-NY
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 56 54 54 54 53 53 53 53 54 54 54 54 54 Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service $20.38 $20.48 $19.81 $19.38 $19.98 $19.81 $20.16 $20.13 $21.10 $20.41 $20.49 $20.17 $20.76 $21.13 200 Five-Minute Business-Day Same-Zone Calls 16.01 16.10 16.88 17.45 17.86 17.66 17.36 17.40 17.33 17.39 17.69 18.09 19.07 18.05 Subscriber Line Charges 4.78 4.88 4.74 4.67 5.24 5.35 5.53 5.46 5.61 6.17 6.83 6.85 6.63 6.34 Extra for Touch-Tone 2.77 2.59 1.99 1.86 1.70 1.24 1.00 0.86 0.36 0.27 0.19 0.13 0.12 0.07 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 4.93 5.10 4.91 5.05 5.20 5.18 5.35 5.55 5.70 6.08 5.95 5.91 6.06 6.53 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 48.87 49.14 48.33 48.41 49.98 49.24 49.40 49.40 50.10 50.32 51.15
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 5.29 6.26 81 0.75 96 Kentucky 1,169,871 63,882 420,476 5.46 6.78 8.07 123 1.14 146 Louisiana 1,519,105 182,311 593,101 5.50 6.98 7.95 172 1.60 205 Maine 488,002 39,507 187,305 5.50 6.42 7.79 53 0.49 63 Maryland 2,026,572 417,126 1,123,956 5.31 5.84 5.85 237 2.21 282 Massachusetts 2,195,609 338,724 1,196,803 5.50 6.42 7.50 279 2.60 331 Michigan 2,992,007 315,260 1,690,877 5.21 5.53 5.97 329 3.07 391 Minnesota 1,748,180 181,347 775,977 5.03 5.18 6.11 174 1.62 206 Mississippi 887,814 65,364 316,152 5.50 6.98 7.94 94 0.88 112 Missouri 1,929,263 226,647 706,992 5.21 5.46 6.59 191 1.78 227 Montana 357,282 25,963 149,885 5.50 7.00 9.20 42 0.39 50 Nebraska 525,597 38,234 290,398 5.12 5.50 6.47 57 0.53 68 Nevada 797,545 117,861 396,956 4.31 4.73
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • COOP. TEL. ASSN. 9.96 -1.28 11.38 126.65 351303 A COOPERATIVE TEL. EXCHANGE 1.47 -1.82 3.36 -0.45 351304 A SWISHER TEL. CO. 10.62 0.49 10.08 53.40 351305 A STRATFORD MUTUAL TEL. CO. 8.69 -0.94 9.72 36.88 351306 A SULLY TEL. ASSOC. 57.06 51.74 3.50 52.66 351307 A SUPERIOR TEL. COOP. -5.18 -6.02 0.89 -10.61 351308 A TEMPLETON TEL. CO. 1.59 -3.73 5.53 5.27 351309 A TERRIL TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE 3.96 -2.13 6.22 10.40 351310 A TITONKA TEL. CO. 7.78 -1.60 9.53 31.82 351316 C UNITED FARMERS TEL. CO. 1.11 -2.37 3.56 0.00 351319 A VAN BUREN TEL. CO., INC. 6.77 -0.32 7.12 18.16 351320 A VAN HORNE COOP. TEL. CO. 16.95 7.69 8.59 38.61 351322 A VENTURA TEL. CO., INC. 2.29 -8.35 11.60
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
  • 4.97 01/01/87 06/30/87 2.00 5.12 07/01/87 12/31/87 2.60 5.12 01/01/88 11/30/88 2.60 5.01 12/01/88 03/31/89 3.20 5.01 04/01/89 12/31/89 3.50 4.94 01/01/90 06/30/90 3.48 4.84 07/01/90 12/31/90 3.48 4.83 01/01/91 06/30/91 3.48 4.77 07/01/91 11/27/91 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 01/01/00 06/30/00 3.50 5.81 6.94 0.92 1.70 2.44 0.35 08/11/00 06/30/01 4.28 5.99 6.88 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.37 07/01/01 12/31/01
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr97-5.pdf
  • 5.01 4.00 12/01/88 03/31/89 3.20 5.01 5.00 04/01/89 12/31/89 3.50 4.94 6.00 01/01/90 06/30/90 3.48 4.84 6.00 07/01/90 12/31/90 3.48 4.83 6.00 01/01/91 06/30/91 3.48 4.77 6.00 07/01/91 11/27/91 3.49 4.74 6.00 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 6.00 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 6.00 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 6.00 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 6.00 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 6.00 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 6.00 *The weighted average national rates are calculated from the rates of price cap companies and companies in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool and excludes companies filing under rate of return or optional incentive rules. The carriers covered comprise approximately 95% of the industry total. In developing the weighted average rate, the weight given an individual company's rate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-7.pdf
  • 4.97 01/01/87 06/30/87 2.00 5.12 07/01/87 12/31/87 2.60 5.12 01/01/88 11/30/88 2.60 5.01 12/01/88 03/31/89 3.20 5.01 04/01/89 12/31/89 3.50 4.94 01/01/90 06/30/90 3.48 4.84 07/01/90 12/31/90 3.48 4.83 01/01/91 06/30/91 3.48 4.77 07/01/91 11/27/91 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 4.98 6.92 0.49 1.50 2.52 0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. ** Prior to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-7.pdf
  • 4.97 01/01/87 06/30/87 2.00 5.12 07/01/87 12/31/87 2.60 5.12 01/01/88 11/30/88 2.60 5.01 12/01/88 03/31/89 3.20 5.01 04/01/89 12/31/89 3.50 4.94 01/01/90 06/30/90 3.48 4.84 07/01/90 12/31/90 3.48 4.83 01/01/91 06/30/91 3.48 4.77 07/01/91 11/27/91 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 07/01/99 12/31/99 3.50 5.84 6.94 0.95 1.77 2.78 0.42 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Trends in Telephone Service and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-7.pdf
  • 4.97 01/01/87 06/30/87 2.00 5.12 07/01/87 12/31/87 2.60 5.12 01/01/88 11/30/88 2.60 5.01 12/01/88 03/31/89 3.20 5.01 04/01/89 12/31/89 3.50 4.94 01/01/90 06/30/90 3.48 4.84 07/01/90 12/31/90 3.48 4.83 01/01/91 06/30/91 3.48 4.77 07/01/91 11/27/91 3.49 4.74 11/28/91 06/30/92 3.49 4.76 07/01/92 06/30/93 3.49 4.68 07/01/93 06/30/94 3.50 5.37 07/01/94 06/30/95 3.50 5.45 07/01/95 06/30/96 3.50 5.50 07/01/96 06/30/97 3.50 5.53 07/01/97 12/31/97 3.50 5.68 01/01/98 06/30/98 3.50 $4.98 6.92 $0.49 $1.50 $2.52 $0.35 07/01/98 12/31/98 3.50 4.99 7.11 0.49 1.38 2.38 0.38 01/01/99 06/30/99 3.50 5.88 7.05 0.49 1.38 2.22 0.32 SOURCE: INDUSTRY ANALYSIS DIVISION, TRENDS IN TELEPHONE SERVICE AND ACCESS TARIFF FILINGS. * This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • 58.90 Number of Sample Cities with Flat-rate Service 59 56 54 54 54 53 53 53 53 54 54 Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service $20.38 $20.48 $19.81 $19.38 $19.98 $19.81 $20.16 $20.13 $21.10 $20.41 $20.83 200 Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Calls 16.01 16.10 16.88 17.45 17.86 17.66 17.36 17.40 17.33 17.39 17.50 Subscriber Line Charges 4.78 4.88 4.74 4.67 5.24 5.35 5.53 5.46 5.61 6.17 6.74 Extra for Touch-tone 2.77 2.59 1.99 1.86 1.70 1.24 1.00 0.86 0.36 0.27 0.19 Taxes, including 911 and other Charges 4.93 5.10 4.91 5.05 5.20 5.18 5.35 5.55 5.70 6.08 5.95 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service 48.87 49.14 48.33 48.41 49.98 49.24 49.40 49.40 50.10 50.32 51.22 Number of Sample Cities with Measured/Message Service 77
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • by Study Area Unseparated Universal Study Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Service Fund Area NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* IOWA (CONT.) 351127 C FRONTIER COMM. OF IOWA, INC. -2.77 2.50 -5.15 0.00 351129 A THE CITIZENS MUTUAL TEL. CO. 9.21 4.43 4.58 40.54 351130 A CLARENCE TEL. CO., INC. 5.53 2.49 2.96 22.18 351132 A CLEAR LAKE INDP. TEL. CO. 16.16 3.99 11.70 0.00 351133 A C-M-L TEL. COOP. ASSN. 3.60 0.11 3.48 10.08 351134 A COLO TEL. CO. 11.12 5.35 5.48 48.84 351136 A COON CREEK TEL. CO. 10.71 2.75 7.75 62.82 351137 A COON VALLEY COOP. TEL. ASSN., INC. 22.66 9.20 12.32 86.69 351139 A COOP. TEL. CO.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • 421186 C GTE MW DBA VERIZON MW INC. (GTE) -15.85 -27.04 15.33 -72.32 421206 A IAMO TELEPHONE COMPANY - MO 20.56 3.70 16.26 143.33 421759 A CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC - MO 16.24 3.26 12.57 124.32 421789 C KS ST. TEL. DBA VERIZON MW INC. (EAST MO) -4.33 4.68 -8.61 -19.34 421807 C MOKAN DIAL, INC.- MO -3.56 2.37 -5.79 -5.53 421846 C GTE-MW DBA VERIZON MW INC. - MO (CONTEL SYS.) -25.08 -54.48 64.61 258.77 421860 A ALMA TELEPHONE COMPANY 15.11 0.78 14.22 129.18 421864 C CHARITON VALLEY TELEPHONE CO. -12.26 5.09 -16.51 -19.54 421865 C CITIZENS TELEPHONE CO - MISSOURI 15.17 0.18 14.96 51.30 421866 C OZARK TELEPHONE COMPANY 21.01 6.87 13.23 32.53 421874 A ELLINGTON TELEPHONE COMPANY 15.03
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/01socc.pdf
  • Jersey 449.6 449.6 447.5 2.11 0.590 1.112 1.702 0.41NJ New Mexico 11.6 (0.004) 11.6 11.7 (0.08) (0.08)NM New York 198.9 198.9 191.4 7.52 7.52NY North Carolina 69.9 69.9 69.5 0.44 0.44NC North Dakota 3.9 0.152 3.8 2.8 0.96 0.96ND Ohio 124.5 4.330 120.2 119.9 0.30 0.011 0.004 0.015 0.28OH Oklahoma 50.9 50.9 50.7 0.17 0.17OK Oregon 40.6 0.638 40.0 34.5 5.53 5.53OR Pennsylvania 270.0 270.0 259.6 10.39 1.189 2.283 3.472 6.92PA Rhode Island 22.2 22.2 22.2 (0.00) (0.00)RI South Carolina 45.9 45.9 44.6 1.33 1.33SC South Dakota 7.7 0.005 7.7 7.7 0.03 0.03SD Tennessee 54.6 54.6 51.6 3.02 3.02TN Texas 213.6 0.006 213.6 212.6 0.95 0.95TX Utah 25.2 0.022 25.2 25.0 0.20 0.20UT Vermont 12.6 12.6 12.6 (0.00) (0.00)VT Virginia 45.5
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/98SOCC.PDF
  • (1.79) 0.43 0.23 (1.12) 21.3 MI MINNESOTA 80.3 59.3 21.0 13.5 7.5 (0.22) (0.33) 0.05 (0.50) 8.0 MN MISSISSIPPI 51.8 26.3 25.5 18.2 7.3 0.11 0.05 0.07 0.23 7.1 MS MISSOURI 315.6 259.5 56.1 38.9 17.2 0.39 (0.38) 0.28 0.30 16.9 MO MONTANA 4.8 8.2 (3.4) (2.8) (0.6) (1.29) (0.62) (0.44) (2.35) 1.8 MT NEBRASKA 127.7 48.2 79.5 60.9 18.6 5.53 3.28 4.73 13.53 5.1 NE NEVADA 145.0 95.5 49.4 39.2 10.2 0.06 (0.15) 0.04 (0.05) 10.3 NV NEW HAMPSHIRE 50.3 15.2 35.1 26.7 8.4 0.65 0.28 0.38 1.31 7.1 NH NEW JERSEY 366.6 226.5 140.1 61.7 78.4 11.85 5.30 7.21 24.36 54.1 NJ NEW MEXICO 46.5 31.4 15.1 10.9 4.2 (0.42) (0.13) (0.01) (0.56) 4.7 NM NEW YORK 740.8 335.2
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1999/da992743.pdf
  • GovernmentTableiscorrectedbyaddingreferencetofootnoteUS211.92 51.Inthe116-126GHzband,WRC-97movedthesecondaryamateurserviceallocation foundinfootnotereference915upintotheTableanddeletedfootnote915.Asaconsequence ofthataction,the116-126GHzbandisdividedintothreebands:116-119.98GHz,119.98- 120.02GHz,and120.02-126GHz;andasecondaryamateurserviceallocationisaddedtothe 119.98-120.02GHzband.WeareconformingtheUnitedStatesTabletothisWRC-97action. 87SeeAmendmentofParts2and87oftheCommission'sRulesRegardingtheRadionavigationServiceat 31.8-32.3GHz,ETDocketNo.98-197,NoticeofProposedRuleMaking,FCC98-289,63FR65726(11/30/98), 13FCCRcd22556(1998). 88Idatfootnote9.SeealsoNTIAManualat4-85. 89SeeAmendmentofPart2oftheCommission'sRulestoAllocateAdditionalSpectrumtotheInter- Satellite,Fixed,andMobileServicesandtoPermitUnlicensedDevicestoUseCertainSegmentsinthe50.2-50.4 GHzand51.4-71.0GHzBands,ETDocketNo.99-261;NoticeofProposedRuleMaking,FCC99-183,14FCC Rcd12473(1999). 90TheseallocationswereadoptedintheSecondReportandOrderinGeneralDocketNo.80-739.See AmendmentofPart2oftheCommission'sRulesRegardingImplementationoftheFinalActsoftheWorld AdministrativeRadioConference,Geneva,1979,GeneralDocketNo.80-739,SecondReportandOrder,FCC 83-511,49FR2357(January19,1989).SeealsoNTIAManualatp.4-89. 91WARC-79addedfootnote722andtheCommissionadoptedthisfootnoteinitsdomesticimplementation proceeding.Idatp.C-159.WRC-95re-numberedfootnote722asS5.341. 92SeeNTIAManualat4-90.WenotethatthistypographicalerroroccurredintheSecondReportand OrderinGeneralDocketNo.80-739.Seenote89,supra. 20 FederalCommunicationsCommission DA99-2743 Alsointhe116-126GHzband(asshowninthe1998C.F.R.),footnote916isre-numberedas S5.138. 52.AtWRC-95,thefootnoteallocationfortheamateurserviceinthe119.98-120.02 GHzband--internationalfootnote915--wastransferredtothebodyoftheTable,andfootnote 915wassuppressed.SincetheUnitedStatesTablecurrentlycontainsthisfootnoteallocation, wearemakingaconformingchangetothenon-Federalgovernmentserviceallocationsinthis band. III.CONCLUSIONANDORDERINGCLAUSE 53.TheInternationalTable,theFederalGovernmentTable,referencestoCommission ruleparts,andspecial-usefrequenciesareincludedintheCommission'sRulesforinformational purposesonly.TheNon-FederalGovernmentTable,whichisadministeredbytheCommission, isamendedhereinbyincorporatingnon-substantive,editorialrevisionsonly.Therefore,there isgoodcausefornotusingnoticeandcommentprocedureinthiscase,andforshorteningthe effectivedateoftheamendmentsfromadatenotlessthan30daysafterpublicationinthe FederalRegistertothedateofsuchpublication.Wefindthatthenormalproceduresfornotice andcommentandforpublicationwouldbeimpracticable,unnecessary,orcontrarytothepublic interest.See5U.S.C.§553(b)(3)(B),(d)(3);Kesslerv.FCC,326F.2d673(D.C.Cir.1963). 54.Accordingly,ITISORDEREDthatPart2oftheCommission'sRules,47C.F.R. Part2,ISAMENDEDassetforthinAppendixB,effectiveuponpublicationintheFederal Register.ThisactionistakenpursuanttoauthorityfoundinSections4(i)and303ofthe CommunicationsActof1934,asamended,47U.S.C.§§154(i)and303,andinSections0.31, 0.231(b)and0.241oftheCommission'sRules,47C.F.R.§§0.31,0.231(b)and0.241. FEDERALCOMMUNICATIONSCOMMISSION DaleN.Hatfield Chief,OfficeofEngineeringandTechnology AndrewS.Fishel ManagingDirector 21 FederalCommunicationsCommission DA99-2743 AppendixA:InternationalFootnotesintheUnitedStatesTable TheFederalandNon-FederalGovernmentTablesareupdatedbyre-numberingthefollowing footnotereferences(exceptasnoted): NewFootnoteOldFootnoteBand(s) Comment S5.53 444 Below9kHz Inthetextofthefootnote,acrossreferencetoanotherITU rulehasbeendropped. S5.54 445 Below9kHz Nochangetothetextofthefootnote("NOC"). S5.57 448 14-19.95kHz 20.05-59kHz 61-70kHz 70-90kHz NOC.Inthe20.05-59kHzband,theFederalGovernment Tableisfirstcorrectedbychangingfootnotereference446 to448,whichisthenre-numberedasS5.57.SeeNTIA Manualat4-4. S5.60 451 70-90kHz 110-130kHz NOC S5.62 453 90-110kHz NOC S5.64 454 110-130kHz 130-160kHz NOC Suppressedat WRC-95 459 160-190kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.73 466 285-325kHz Slightmodificationtothetextofthefootnote. S5.76 468 405-415kHz NOC S5.79 470 415-435kHz 505-510kHz NOC S5.81 471 435-495kHz 435-495kHz 505-510kHz Noactiontakenatthistime. S5.82 472A 435-495kHz Noactiontakenatthistime.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Reports/fcc98091.pdf
  • 38 106.34 43 7.34 38 McLeod, Inc. 7.09 7.09 39 70.92 47 7.09 39 Puerto Rico Telephone 3.52 3.52 7.04 40 123.27 41 3.52 50 Chase Telecom (PK) 6.54 6.54 41 196.17 31 6.54 40 Atlantic Cellular Company 1.00 5.03 6.03 42 75.29 45 6.03 41 Dobson Comm. (SEC) 1.41 4.20 5.61 43 77.22 44 5.61 42 Southern New Eng. 5.53 5.53 44 138.13 36 5.53 43 Pricellular Corporation 5.10 5.10 45 127.38 39 5.10 44 ACC-PCS (PK) 5.04 5.04 46 50.42 49 5.04 45 Poka Lambro (PK) 0.06 1.34 3.29 4.69 47 74.67 46 4.69 46 DCC PCS (PK) 4.49 4.49 48 44.85 50 4.49 47 US Unwired 1.29 0.47 2.44 4.21 49 70.85 48 3.99 48 Texas Utilities 3.96
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-109A1.html
  • Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission ("Bureau") and DRS Technologies, Inc. ("DRS Technologies"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau into whether DRS Technologies complied with sections 301 and 310(d) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and with sections 1.948, 5.53(a), 5.59(d), and 25.119 of the Commission's rules ("Rules"), relating to several transactions completed by DRS Technologies and its wholly-owned subsidiary companies between April 1, 2008 and January 1, 2010, and to DRS Technologies' operation of certain experimental radio facilities. 2. The Bureau and DRS Technologies have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4389A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4389A1.pdf
  • because neither would provide a first or second NCE service to at least ten percent of the population. Harris argues that its proposed first or second NCE service to 28,453 people (9.46 percent of the population) comes very close to the ten percent threshold and should be preferred over HFC's proposed first or second NCE service to only 4,886 people (5.53 percent of the population). Harris asserts that a waiver of the ten percent threshold would serve the public interest by bringing new service to substantially more people than HFC's proposal. Harris acknowledges that the Commission denied a similar waiver request in the Omnibus Order. Nevertheless, Harris maintains that the equities of the current case are different because Harris could have
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/materials/already-released/radiomarket090002.pdf
  • generate =3011ii = 45,451 station-pair distance observations. In 2001, we have 288 stations, so we generate 41,328 station-pair distance observations. We use the distance function to create some simple descriptive statistics. Table 2 shows the average distance between top ten lists among stations within the same R&R format. Table 2 Average Distance Within Formats Format 1996 2001 Adult Contemporary 6.51 5.53 Active Rock 6.84 6.02 Adult Alternative 7.65 7.06 Alternative 7.44 6.68 CHR Pop 7.09 6.00 CHR Rhythm 7.66 6.79 Country 4.68 5.94 Hot Adult Contemporary 7.09 6.49 Jazz 8.05 6.39 Rock 7.25 6.94 Urban Adult Contemporary 6.75 7.21 Urban 5.33 6.68 11 The first row in Table 2 shows that, on average, Adult Contemporary top 10 radio lists differ by
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-b.pdf
  • (Oct 1956) pp. 416-424. Wildman, Steven S. and Theomary Karamanis, "The Economics of Minority Programming." Paper presented at 1997 Aspen Institute Forum, "Delivering on Diversity: New Approaches to Marketing Minority Programming." November 1997. 35 Table 1a: Summary Statistics, 1997 All MarketsMarkets with Black Data Markets with Hispanic Data Formats 14.80 16.31 16.84 Stations Total 24.48 26.65 29.33 Youth-Targeted 5.56 6.48 5.53 Middle-Age-Targeted 14.12 15.32 17.96 Older-Targeted 4.80 4.85 5.84 White-Targeted 22.55 22.62 27.96 Black (non-white)-Targeted 1.92 4.03 1.37 Hispanic-Targeted 1.07 0.78 4.65 Non-Hispanic Targeted 23.41 25.87 24.69 AQH Listening (%) Total 15.77 15.98 16.36 White (Non-Black) 15.44 Black 17.88 Non-Hispanic 15.80 Hispanic 17.50 Population (millions) Total 0.70 1.16 1.62 White (Non-Black) 0.63 0.97 Black 0.08 0.19 Non-Hispanic 1.28 Hispanic 0.07 0.11