FCC Web Documents citing 5.85

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-302A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-302A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-302A1.txt
  • treaties, conventions, regulations, arrangements, and agreements. At this time, international agreements between and among the United States, Mexico, and Canada concerning the 5.9 GHz spectrum for ITS applications have not been established. Although the agreement with the Canadian Government, "Agreement Concerning the Coordination and Use of Radio Frequencies Above Thirty Megacycles per Second," with Annex, as amended, applies to the 5.85-5.925 GHz band, no agreement is in place for the current ITS allocation. Consequently, licensees may be subject to future agreements with Canada and Mexico and therefore may be subject to further modification. One option would be to propose certain interim requirements for terrestrial licenses along these borders, and to provide that licensees will be subject to the provisions contained within
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2664A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2664A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2664A1.txt
  • adjacent satellite operations increases whenever a collision takes place. Table 2: Power Increases Caused by Collisions Number of Colliding Transmissions Power Increase in dB 1 0 2 3.0 3 4.7 4 6.0 5 7.0 Spacenet argues that we should discount high power levels for the low probability of occurrence. Specifically, Spacenet argues that the Net Power Increase (NPI) should be -5.85 dB for a single-station transmission, -10.09 dB for a two-station collision, and so on. Based on this, Spacenet claims that Over-Time Net Power Increase (ONPI) from two simultaneously transmitting remote stations is 4.20 dB below the emission of a single station transmitting constantly at the maximum authorized power under the current Rule. By using ONPI, Spacenet demonstrates the inbound carrier
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-157A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-157A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-157A1.txt
  • role in the country's public safety communications scheme, it is anticipated that ITS will significantly improve the efficiency and safety of surface transportation systems. In 1991, a national program within the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) was established to develop ITS within the United States. On June 11, 1998, the Commission initiated a rulemaking proceeding, which proposed to allocate the 5.85-5.925 GHz band on a primary basis to the mobile service for use by Dedicated Short Range Communications (DSRC)-based ITS operations. On October 21, 1999, the Commission adopted a Report and Order allocating 75 MHz of radio spectrum to implement the proposal. We envision that ITS services will improve traveler safety and decrease traffic congestion, among other goals. In particular, DSRC-based
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-54A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-54A1.txt
  • million in mid-2007.580 Using these estimates, comScore also found that the penetration rate for 3G devices rose from 16.7 percent of U.S. mobile subscribers in mid-2007 to 28.4 percent of subscribers in mid-2008. 207. In contrast with text messaging and other handset-based mobile data applications, subscriber numbers for paging continue to drop. Using NRUF data, the Commission estimates there were 5.85 million paging units in service as of the end of 2007, down from 6.1 million paging units at the end of 2006, 8.3 million units at the end of 2005, 8.5 million units at the end of 2004, 11.2 million units at the end of 2003, and 14.1 million units at the end of 2002.581 2. Minutes of Use 208.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1741A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1741A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1741A1.txt
  • Act of 1996, CC Docket No. 96-187 10/31/12 3060-0748 Secs. 64.1504, 64.1509, and 64.1510 04/30/13 3060-0750 Secs. 73.671 and 73.673 07/31/11 3060-0751 Sec. 43.51, Reports Concerning International Private Lines Interconnected to the U.S. Public Switched Network 12/31/11 3060-0754 FCC 398 04/30/12 3060-0755 Secs. 59.1, 59.2, 59.3 and 59.4 03/31/12 3060-0757 FCC Auctions Customer Survey 05/31/13 3060-0758 Secs. 5.55, 5.61, 5.75, 5.85, and 5.93, Experimental Radio Service Regulations, ET Docket No. 96-256 04/30/13 3060-0760 Access Charge Reform, CC Docket No. 96-262 09/30/11 3060-0761 Sec. 79.1 07/31/12 3060-0763 FCC Report 43-06 04/30/12 3060-0767 Secs. 1.2110, 1.2111, and 1.2112, Auction Forms and License Transfer Disclosure Requirements 04/30/11 3060-0768 28 GHz Band 12/31/11 3060-0770 Secs. 1.774, 61.49, 61.55, 61.58, 69.4, 69.707, 69.713, and 69.729, FCC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212890A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212890A1.txt
  • 0.00 dBW COMPRESSED DIGITAL VIDEO. 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 4M00G7W 53.10 dBW DIGITAL DATA. 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 51K2G7D 0.00 dBW DIGITAL DATA. 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 51K2G7D Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) E010124 SES-LIC-20010501-00847 THE BOEING COMPANY Application for Authority Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service 47 ° 25 ' 5.85 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 20403 68TH AVE. S., KING, KENT, WA 122 ° 15 ' 12.19 " W LONG. LOCATION: ANDREW CORP. A1 4.6 meters ANTENNA ID: ES46MPJ--4124W 76.80 dBW OQPSK DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 24M3G7D Page 3 of 10 79.80 dBW OQPSK DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 32M4G7D OQPSK DATA 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 24M3G7D OQPSK
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213503A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213503A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213503A1.txt
  • of License of Station WTVE(TV), Channel 51, Reading, Pennsylvania and Adams Communications Corporation for Construction Permit for a New Television Station to Operate on Channel 51, Reading, Pennsylvania (MM Docket No. 99-153 - Request for Expedited Action on Petition to Intervene as a Party. Erwin G. Krasnow, Eric T. Werner. May 31 In the Matter of Service Rules for the 5.85-5.925 GHz Band, and Revisions to Part 90 of the Commission's Rules (WT Docket No. 01-90)/Status Report on Licensing and Service Issues and Deployment Strategies for DSRC-Based Intelligent Transportation Services in the 5.850 -5.925 GHz Band. Reply Comments - The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, The Federal Signal Corporation. In the Matter of Implementation of the Subscriber Changes
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-232334A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-232334A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-232334A1.txt
  • 8bit œ a c c c c c c ‡ ‡ a a + a W March 21, 2003 FCC FILINGS March 12 In the Matter of Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding Dedicated Short-Range Communication Services in the 5.850-5.925 GHz Band (5.9 GHz Band)(WT Docket No. 01-90)/Amendment of Parts 2 and 90 of the Commission's Rules to Allocate the 5.85 - 5.925 GHz Band to the Mobile Service for Dedicated Short Range Communications of Intelligent Transportation Services (ET Docket No. 98-95). Comments - The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Special Committee on Wireless Technology. March 13 In the Matter of Telephone Number Portability (CC Docket No. 95-116). Reply Comments - The South Dakota Telecommunications Association. March 14
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243941A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243941A1.txt
  • Cleveland Miami Phoenix Denver Sacramento Pittsburgh 0.5 0.1 a -1 19 'E.L -125 'E.L 6' 0.45 m 34.0 dBi 12.2 GHz BO-1 21 3 EIRP Topo with Mispointlng (L. Station Keeping (7 WW) 54.06 50.45 52.59 54.16 52.00 53.08 53.31 54.32 52.72 55.15 54.08 52.00 52.22 54.67 53.26 54.29 51.18 51.67 52.00 54.10 5180 6.21 5.83 5.82 6.17 5.75 6.11 5.85 5.66 5.98 6.12 6.03 5.95 6.00 5.88 5.98 6.20 6.09 6.15 5.87 Req. Single Entry CII (dB) 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 New Entrant Max. ElRP WW) 53.82 50.95 52.59 53.96 52.42 52.76 53.64 54.17 52.63 55.24 54.43 52.18 52 25 54.70 83.17 54.38 51.67
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-250418A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-250418A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-250418A1.txt
  • to operate in 910-920 MHz, 2900-3100 MHz and 9000-10000 MHz for development and testing of weather radar. Fixed: Amherst (Hampshire), MA WD2XJU HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, INC. 0116-EX-PL-2004 New experimental to operate in 1626-1650 MHz for testing Inmarsat terminals. Fixed: San Diego (San Diego), CA WD2XGX GENERAL ATOMICS AERONAUTICAL SYSTEMS, INC. 0264-EX-PL-2003 New experimental to operate on 5.3, 5.35, 5.8 and 5.85 GHz for UAV demonstration and testing. Mobile: Gila Bend (MARICOPA), AZ WD2XGZ GENERAL ATOMICS AERONAUTICAL SYSTEMS, INC. 0265-EX-PL-2003 New experimental to operate on 5.3, 5.35, 5.8 and 5.85 GHz for UAV demonstration and testing. Mobile: Sells (PIMA), AZ WD2XGY GENERAL ATOMICS AERONAUTICAL SYSTEMS, INC. 0266-EX-PL-2003 New experimental to operate on 5.3, 5.35, 5.8 and 5.85 GHz for UAV demonstration and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255118A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255118A1.txt
  • Subscribers (in millions) 1 0 1 0.85 1 1.29 1 4.10 2 0 2 1.27 2 1.91 2 6.08 3 0 3 1.71 3 2.59 3 8.22 4 0 4 2.18 4 3.30 4 10.49 5 0 5 2.75 5 4.16 5 13.22 6 3.39 6 16.27 7 4.09 7 19.64 8 4.73 8 22.74 9 5.52 9 26.52 10 5.85 10 28.09 21 TABLE 5 SUBSCRIBER PROFILES FOR 70% SURVIVAL PROBABILITY OVER 5 AND 10 YEARS TABLE 6 SUBSCRIBER PROFILES FOR 90% SURVIVAL PROBABILITY OVER 5 AND 10 YEARS Weibull No Unobserved Heterogeneity 5 Years Weibull No Unobserved Heterogeneity 10 Years Weibull Unobserved Heterogeneity 5 Years Weibull Unobserved Heterogeneity 10 Years Year Subscribers (in millions) Year Subscribers (in millions) Year
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257632A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257632A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257632A1.txt
  • MHz to support testing of a Point-to-Multipoint Wireless DOCSIS (Data-Over-Cable Service Interface Specifications) distribution system. Mobile: Within the city limits of Anchorage, Alaska WD2XNG CAMTROL SYSTEMS, LLC 0285-EX-PL-2004 New experimental to operate in 2.4 GHz band for Testing Part 15 product. Fixed & Mobile: within the state of MA WD2XMN MARK IV INDUSTRIES CORP. 0218-EX-PL-2004 New experimental to operate in 5.85-5.925 GHz for Dedicated Short Range Communications service demonstrations. Mobile: Nationwide m ¡ ¢ Î m u ¡ ¢ Î Ú þ ... Ï µI-c¶ Ii „¶ ¶ ^„¶ „¶ ¶ ^„¶ Ii Ï ... (Q íZ ü| á ˜ [ ­
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • 6.47 5.37 341036 C VERIZON NORTH INC.-IL (CONTEL) 11.72 -3.79 16.12 0.00 341037 C ILLINOIS CONS. TEL. CO. 6.02 -3.38 9.74 46.70 341038 C FRONTIER COMM. OF ILLINOIS, INC. -29.70 -2.11 -28.18 0.00 341041 A KINSMAN MUTUAL TEL. CO. -12.90 -12.84 -0.06 -19.48 341043 C LA HARPE TEL. CO. -4.49 1.75 -6.13 -10.78 341045 C LEAF RIVER TEL. CO. 7.12 -5.85 13.78 12.41 341046 A LEONORE MUTUAL TEL. CO. -3.99 -5.20 1.28 -9.42 341047 C MCDONOUGH TEL. COOP., INC. 14.60 -2.80 17.91 27.27 341048 C MCNABB TEL. CO. -10.13 -1.67 -8.60 -68.10 341049 C MADISON TEL. CO. 7.20 -0.06 7.27 8.10 341049A C MADISON TEL. CO. 7.85 0.00 7.85 30.74 341050 A MARSEILLES TEL. CO. OF MARS. 0.53 -4.01 4.73 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • 6.47 5.37 341036 C VERIZON NORTH INC.-IL (CONTEL) 11.72 -3.79 16.12 0.00 341037 C ILLINOIS CONS. TEL. CO. 6.02 -3.38 9.74 46.70 341038 C FRONTIER COMM. OF ILLINOIS, INC. -29.70 -2.11 -28.18 0.00 341041 A KINSMAN MUTUAL TEL. CO. -12.90 -12.84 -0.06 -19.48 341043 C LA HARPE TEL. CO. -4.49 1.75 -6.13 -10.78 341045 C LEAF RIVER TEL. CO. 7.12 -5.85 13.78 12.41 341046 A LEONORE MUTUAL TEL. CO. -3.99 -5.20 1.28 -9.42 341047 C MCDONOUGH TEL. COOP., INC. 14.60 -2.80 17.91 27.27 341048 C MCNABB TEL. CO. -10.13 -1.67 -8.60 -68.10 341049 C MADISON TEL. CO. 7.20 -0.06 7.27 8.10 341049A C MADISON TEL. CO. 7.85 0.00 7.85 30.74 341050 A MARSEILLES TEL. CO. OF MARS. 0.53 -4.01 4.73 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A6.txt
  • 2,459,461 4.12 Rhode Island 159,205 9,902,576 62.20 6,773,242 42.54 3,129,334 19.66 South Carolina 694,584 67,065,947 96.56 42,178,817 60.73 24,887,130 35.83 South Dakota 128,039 2,949,874 23.04 1,683,427 13.15 1,266,447 9.89 Tennessee 928,000 35,372,878 38.12 23,640,683 25.47 11,732,195 12.64 Texas 4,259,823 255,664,786 60.02 191,472,829 44.95 64,191,957 15.07 Utah 489,072 7,471,621 15.28 6,145,653 12.57 1,325,968 2.71 Vermont 99,978 1,668,556 16.69 1,083,477 10.84 585,079 5.85 Virgin Islands 18,333 1,088,559 59.38 906,856 49.47 181,703 9.91 Virginia 1,177,229 25,703,391 21.83 19,694,011 16.73 6,009,380 5.10 Washington 1,014,798 18,228,661 17.96 12,541,962 12.36 5,686,699 5.60 West Virginia 282,455 8,216,886 29.09 5,030,750 17.81 3,186,136 11.28 Wisconsin 881,231 31,789,093 36.07 26,988,766 30.63 4,800,327 5.45 Wyoming 88,116 2,837,981 32.21 1,883,919 21.38 954,062 10.83 Totals 48,876,386 $2,205,513,186 $45.12 $1,477,164,705 $30.22 $728,348,481 $14.90 Activity through
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.txt
  • 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.59 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 3.98 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71 $42.71 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.31 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 18.76 21.91 Mississippi 9.52 - 9.76 - 9.68 20.83 20.50 - 21.49 - 22.53 18.00 Missouri 7.49 2.79 7.72 2.54 8.58 2.83 18.29 21.00 17.38 - 17.93 - Montana 9.51 10.78 9.80 11.77 9.65 16.16 15.71 16.99 13.21 15.65 12.80 16.10 Nebraska 8.89 15.61 8.89 15.41 8.90 14.72 14.28 28.00 14.35 28.81 15.15 28.00 Nevada 7.93 5.65 7.82 5.72 7.63 5.85 16.88 23.60 16.86 55.25 16.86 60.00 New Hampshire 7.99 - 8.18 - 8.15 - 18.78 - 17.75 - 18.48 - New Jersey 9.52 - 9.73 - 9.73 - 21.18 - 21.18 - 21.18 - New Mexico 9.64 15.27 9.92 16.98 9.93 20.41 22.52 15.16 14.28 17.37 17.09 19.32 New York 9.64 7.43 9.68 9.67 9.61 9.42 26.61 - 27.33 -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.txt
  • 18.76 21.91 Mississippi 9.52 - 9.76 - 9.68 20.83 20.50 - 21.49 - 22.53 18.00 Missouri 7.49 2.79 7.72 2.54 8.58 2.83 18.29 21.00 17.38 - 17.93 - Montana 9.51 10.78 9.80 11.77 9.65 16.16 15.71 16.99 13.21 15.65 12.80 16.10 Nebraska 8.89 15.61 8.89 15.41 8.90 14.72 14.28 28.00 14.35 28.81 15.15 28.00 Nevada 7.93 5.65 7.82 5.72 7.63 5.85 16.88 23.60 16.86 55.25 16.86 60.00 New Hampshire 7.99 - 8.18 - 8.15 - 18.78 - 17.75 - 18.48 - New Jersey 9.52 - 9.73 - 9.73 - 21.18 - 21.18 - 21.18 - New Mexico 9.64 15.27 9.92 16.98 9.93 20.41 22.52 15.16 14.28 17.37 17.09 19.32 New York 9.64 7.43 9.68 9.67 9.61 9.42 26.61 - 27.33 -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • CO. 2.95 -4.05 7.29 13.92 351326 A WALNUT TEL. CO. 0.92 -4.85 6.07 8.30 351327 C WEBB-DICKENS TEL. CORP. 7.26 -3.08 10.67 0.00 351328 A WEBSTER-CALHOUN COOP. TEL. ASSN. 6.71 -2.40 9.34 19.97 351329 A WELLMAN COOP. TEL. ASSN. 13.52 -0.14 13.67 138.38 351331 A WEST IOWA TEL. CO. 3.89 -2.57 6.63 14.59 351332 A WEST LIBERTY TEL. CO. 18.73 -5.85 26.11 INFINITE 351334 A WESTERN IOWA TEL. ASSN. 14.42 8.14 5.81 20.08 351335 A WESTSIDE INDP. TEL. CO. 10.53 1.96 8.41 22.42 351336 A WILTON TEL. CO. 20.53 -3.55 24.97 INFINITE 351337 A WINNEBAGO COOP. TEL. ASSN.-IA 4.72 -3.83 8.89 19.04 351342 A WOOLSTOCK MUT. TEL. ASSN. 6.24 -3.25 9.81 19.38 351343 A WYOMING MUTUAL TEL. CO. 0.93 -4.26 5.43
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A6.txt
  • by State Funding Year 2004: July 1, 2004 through June 30, 2005 Students Funds Funds Unused Unused in Public Funds Committed Funds Disbursed Funding Commitments State/Territory Schools1 Committed per Student Disbursed per Student Commitments per Student Alabama 731,220 $25,971,584 $35.52 $20,859,730 $28.53 $5,111,854 $6.99 Alaska 133,933 18,279,315 136.48 14,616,877 109.14 3,662,438 27.35 American Samoa 15,893 2,194,572 138.08 2,101,584 132.23 92,988 5.85 Arizona 1,012,068 57,228,919 56.55 32,686,618 32.30 24,542,301 24.25 Arkansas 454,523 18,140,381 39.91 12,453,372 27.40 5,687,009 12.51 California 6,413,862 265,700,013 41.43 147,282,379 22.96 118,417,634 18.46 Colorado 757,693 23,628,457 31.18 18,302,804 24.16 5,325,653 7.03 Connecticut 577,203 32,303,694 55.97 17,886,530 30.99 14,417,164 24.98 Delaware 117,668 461,661 3.92 394,791 3.36 66,870 0.57 Dist. of Columbia 78,057 10,366,111 132.80 6,314,581 80.90 4,051,530 51.90 Florida 2,587,628
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.41 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71 42.71 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.31 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. Residential and Single-Line Business Centrex Charged to Long Distance Carriers 3 (Presubscribed Interexchange Carrier Charges) (Subscriber Line Charges) 5.81 5.93 5.93 Charged to End Users 2 5.88 5.94 5.85 5.83 1 - 3 Table 1.2 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges (National Average in Cents per Minute) 1 Total Charge per Conversation Minute 3 05/26/84 01/14/85 5.24¢ 5.24¢ 3.10¢ 17.26¢ 01/15/85 05/31/85 5.43 5.43 3.10 17.66 06/01/85 09/30/85 4.71 4.71 3.10 16.17 10/01/85 05/31/86 4.33 4.33 3.10 15.38 06/01/86 12/31/86 3.04 4.33 3.10 14.00 01/01/87 06/30/87 1.55 4.33 3.10 12.41 07/01/87
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 18.85 39.81 20.07 20.33 Mississippi 9.76 - 9.68 20.83 9.76 24.65 21.49 - 22.56 18.00 21.60 18.00 Missouri 7.72 2.54 8.59 2.57 9.18 3.29 17.35 - 17.92 - 17.76 10.00 Montana 9.80 11.77 9.65 16.16 10.13 19.65 13.21 15.65 12.80 16.10 14.59 16.05 Nebraska 8.89 15.41 8.89 14.72 8.89 14.71 14.35 15.33 14.48 14.00 16.11 13.97 Nevada 7.82 5.72 7.63 5.85 7.07 6.26 16.86 55.25 16.86 60.00 19.57 21.86 New Hampshire 8.18 - 8.15 - 8.16 - 17.75 - 18.48 - 17.10 - New Jersey 9.73 - 9.73 - 9.45 - 21.18 - 21.18 - 21.18 - New Mexico 9.92 16.98 9.93 20.41 9.90 21.69 14.24 17.23 17.04 19.26 21.41 19.52 New York 9.68 9.67 9.60 9.42 9.55 9.79 27.33 -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A11.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A11.txt
  • 95.5 826.9 149.6 1,951.1 562.4 26,490.0 3,334.5 For Unscheduled Events Over 2 Minutes NA NA 826.9 149.6 2,172.2 563.1 45,489.9 3,180.5 For Unscheduled Downtime More Than 2 Minutes Number of Occurrences or Events 0 0 7 2 107 8 68 48 Events per Hundred Switches 0.0 0.0 3.4 3.0 8.1 3.0 242.9 18.0 Events per Million Access Lines 0.00 0.00 5.85 2.44 15.86 36.00 91.63 103.20 Average Outage Duration in Minutes NA NA 405.6 83.5 447.0 313.2 312.2 293.8 Average Lines Affected per Event in Thousands NA NA 3.0 3.0 8.5 0.4 1.3 0.5 Outage Line-Minutes per Event in Thousands NA NA 989.6 267.9 3,731.0 109.7 902.3 117.1 Outage Line-Minutes per 1,000 Access Lines 0.0 0.0 5,789.9 652.8 59,192.0 3,948.8 82,675.6
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A4.txt
  • 18.85 39.81 20.07 20.33 Mississippi 9.76 - 9.68 20.83 9.76 24.65 21.49 - 22.56 18.00 21.60 18.00 Missouri 7.72 2.54 8.59 2.57 9.18 3.29 17.35 - 17.92 - 17.76 10.00 Montana 9.80 11.77 9.65 16.16 10.13 19.65 13.21 15.65 12.80 16.10 14.59 16.05 Nebraska 8.89 15.41 8.89 14.72 8.89 14.71 14.35 15.33 14.48 14.00 16.11 13.97 Nevada 7.82 5.72 7.63 5.85 7.07 6.26 16.86 55.25 16.86 60.00 19.57 21.86 New Hampshire 8.18 - 8.15 - 8.16 - 17.75 - 18.48 - 17.10 - New Jersey 9.73 - 9.73 - 9.45 - 21.18 - 21.18 - 21.18 - New Mexico 9.92 16.98 9.93 20.41 9.90 21.69 14.24 17.23 17.04 19.26 21.41 19.52 New York 9.68 9.67 9.60 9.42 9.55 9.79 27.33 -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • 11.45 40.17 351316 C UNITED FARMERS TEL. CO. 21.55 1.48 19.78 0.00 351319 A VAN BUREN TEL. CO., INC. 9.54 -4.04 14.16 44.47 351320 A VAN HORNE COOP. TEL. CO. 5.47 -5.48 11.58 38.93 351322 A VENTURA TEL. CO., INC. 10.39 -2.31 12.99 42.78 351324 A VILLISCA FARMERS TEL. CO. 8.49 -1.41 10.03 35.08 351326 A WALNUT TEL. CO. -0.52 -5.85 5.65 10.49 351327 C WEBB-DICKENS TEL. CORP. 40.99 -3.58 46.23 0.00 351328 A WEBSTER-CALHOUN COOP. TEL. ASSN. 15.30 -3.16 19.07 48.52 351329 A WELLMAN COOP. TEL. ASSN. -2.72 -7.01 4.61 6.23 351331 A WEST IOWA TEL. CO. 0.60 -4.52 5.37 10.80 351332 A WEST LIBERTY TEL. CO. 2.66 1.07 1.57 -22.74 351334 A WESTERN IOWA TEL. ASSN. 4.45 -11.23 17.66
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.txt
  • 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.48 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 42.54 42.71 42.80 42.92 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.86 Note: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. Residential and Single-Line Business Centrex Charged to Long Distance Carriers 3 (Presubscribed Interexchange Carrier Charges) (Subscriber Line Charges) 5.81 5.93 5.93 Charged to End Users 2 5.88 5.94 5.85 5.83 5.81 1 - 3 Table 1.2 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges (National Average in Cents per Minute) 1 Total Charge per Conversation Minute 3 05/26/84 01/14/85 5.24¢ 5.24¢ 3.10¢ 17.26¢ 01/15/85 05/31/85 5.43 5.43 3.10 17.66 06/01/85 09/30/85 4.71 4.71 3.10 16.17 10/01/85 05/31/86 4.33 4.33 3.10 15.38 06/01/86 12/31/86 3.04 4.33 3.10 14.00 01/01/87 06/30/87 1.55 4.33 3.10 12.41
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95$44.10$42.95$41.16$42.54$42.71$42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 12.65 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.96 5.38 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • 18.85 39.81 20.05 20.33 13.27 18.20 Mississippi 9.68 20.83 9.76 24.65 9.81 25.32 22.56 18.00 21.60 18.00 20.68 - Missouri 8.59 2.57 9.18 3.29 9.08 2.08 17.92 - 17.69 10.00 17.73 10.00 Montana 9.65 16.16 10.13 19.77 9.86 21.38 12.80 16.10 14.59 16.05 14.01 15.97 Nebraska 8.89 14.72 8.89 14.71 8.81 14.75 14.48 14.00 16.11 13.97 16.11 16.23 Nevada 7.63 5.85 7.07 6.26 7.17 6.32 16.86 60.00 19.57 21.86 18.77 18.00 New Hampshire 8.15 - 8.16 - 8.17 - 18.48 - 17.10 - 18.33 - New Jersey 9.73 - 9.45 - 9.76 - 21.18 - 21.18 - 21.18 - New Mexico 9.93 20.41 9.89 21.75 9.87 21.79 17.04 19.26 21.23 19.66 16.29 19.36 New York 9.60 9.42 9.55 9.79 9.63 9.45
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A4.pdf
  • 18.85 39.81 20.05 20.33 13.27 18.20 Mississippi 9.68 20.83 9.76 24.65 9.81 25.32 22.56 18.00 21.60 18.00 20.68 - Missouri 8.59 2.57 9.18 3.29 9.08 2.08 17.92 - 17.69 10.00 17.73 10.00 Montana 9.65 16.16 10.13 19.77 9.86 21.38 12.80 16.10 14.59 16.05 14.01 15.97 Nebraska 8.89 14.72 8.89 14.71 8.81 14.75 14.48 14.00 16.11 13.97 16.11 16.23 Nevada 7.63 5.85 7.07 6.26 7.17 6.32 16.86 60.00 19.57 21.86 18.77 18.00 New Hampshire 8.15 - 8.16 - 8.17 - 18.48 - 17.10 - 18.33 - New Jersey 9.73 - 9.45 - 9.76 - 21.18 - 21.18 - 21.18 - New Mexico 9.93 20.41 9.89 21.75 9.87 21.79 17.04 19.26 21.23 19.66 16.29 19.36 New York 9.60 9.42 9.55 9.79 9.63 9.45
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • Fund Submission of 2006 Study Results(September 28, 2007) 3 - 30 Table 3.18 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2005 to 2006 by State or Jurisdiction State or Jurisdiction ALABAMA -3.54 -4.99 1.53 -31.30 ALASKA -1.36 -4.81 3.62 -2.62 AMERICAN SAMOA -9.91 -1.92 -8.15 0.00 ARIZONA -8.53 -6.95 -1.70 -6.11 ARKANSAS 0.47 -5.07 5.84 3.30 CALIFORNIA 0.86 -4.72 5.85 3.90 COLORADO -10.59 -6.98 -3.88 -0.80 CONNECTICUT 1.58 -7.18 9.44 0.00 DELAWARE 2.07 -7.42 10.25 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA -8.19 -5.57 -2.77 0.00 FLORIDA -1.66 -6.69 5.39 38.08 GEORGIA -4.64 -5.65 1.07 -14.52 GUAM 2.58 -2.53 5.25 43.17 HAWAII -6.34 -7.10 0.81 23.40 IDAHO -18.04 -3.05 -15.46 -7.24 ILLINOIS -1.70 -6.92 5.61 7.05 INDIANA -1.07 -7.44 6.88 21.50 IOWA -4.93
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.pdf
  • 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.44 3.17 3.45 3.41 Total Connection Charge $49.25 $47.55 $46.60 $47.26 $47.15 $45.57 $45.01 $44.92 $44.46 $43.58 $43.70 $43.67 $43.74 $43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.71 $42.80 $43.13 $43.22 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 12.65 13.91 12.65 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 4.08 4.42 4.96 5.38 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • 6.73 -9.55 18.01 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 0.73 -7.65 9.08 0.00 FLORIDA -6.19 -8.60 2.63 5.93 GEORGIA -6.23 -7.00 0.83 -22.31 GUAM 1.25 -1.02 2.29 -71.60 HAWAII -1.82 -7.49 6.13 -0.82 IDAHO 19.19 -6.02 26.83 -3.81 ILLINOIS 1.09 -7.16 8.89 -7.06 INDIANA 3.44 -7.06 11.30 16.06 IOWA 5.63 -6.51 12.98 -15.21 KANSAS 2.67 -7.36 10.83 4.43 KENTUCKY -7.72 -7.93 0.22 -5.85 LOUISIANA -8.38 -5.36 -3.19 -8.19 MAINE -1.30 -7.54 6.74 -25.32 MARYLAND -1.31 -7.32 6.48 57.59 MASSACHUSETTS -3.47 -8.12 5.05 101.01 MICHIGAN -1.82 -11.30 10.69 4.47 MINNESOTA 0.84 -6.86 8.26 -7.68 MISSISSIPPI -4.91 -6.15 1.33 -10.29 MISSOURI 5.37 -5.69 11.74 18.32 MONTANA 2.09 -7.10 9.89 9.14 NEBRASKA -2.26 -5.56 3.50 -1.33 NEVADA -0.51 -8.99 9.32 -4.54 NEW HAMPSHIRE -3.19 -8.22 5.48
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • 6.73 -9.55 18.01 0.00 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 0.73 -7.65 9.08 0.00 FLORIDA -6.19 -8.60 2.63 5.93 GEORGIA -6.23 -7.00 0.83 -22.31 GUAM 1.25 -1.02 2.29 -71.60 HAWAII -1.82 -7.49 6.13 -0.82 IDAHO 19.19 -6.02 26.83 -3.81 ILLINOIS 1.09 -7.16 8.89 -7.06 INDIANA 3.44 -7.06 11.30 16.06 IOWA 5.63 -6.51 12.98 -15.21 KANSAS 2.67 -7.36 10.83 4.43 KENTUCKY -7.72 -7.93 0.22 -5.85 LOUISIANA -8.38 -5.36 -3.19 -8.19 MAINE -1.30 -7.54 6.74 -25.32 MARYLAND -1.31 -7.32 6.48 57.59 MASSACHUSETTS -3.47 -8.12 5.05 101.01 MICHIGAN -1.82 -11.30 10.69 4.47 MINNESOTA 0.84 -6.86 8.26 -7.68 MISSISSIPPI -4.91 -6.15 1.33 -10.29 MISSOURI 5.37 -5.69 11.74 18.32 MONTANA 2.09 -7.10 9.89 9.14 NEBRASKA -2.26 -5.56 3.50 -1.33 NEVADA -0.51 -8.99 9.32 -4.54 NEW HAMPSHIRE -3.19 -8.22 5.48
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A6.txt
  • 18,564,033 139.99 16,567,404 124.94 1,996,629 15.06 American Samoa 16,400 1,932,498 117.84 1,749,217 106.66 183,281 11.18 Arizona 1,068,249 60,099,853 56.26 44,236,980 41.41 15,862,872 14.85 Arkansas 476,409 22,942,913 48.16 14,614,890 30.68 8,328,023 17.48 California 6,406,750 250,718,361 39.13 197,085,679 30.76 53,632,682 8.37 Colorado 794,026 19,519,303 24.58 15,298,466 19.27 4,220,837 5.32 Connecticut 575,100 21,726,651 37.78 17,579,396 30.57 4,147,255 7.21 Delaware 122,254 784,933 6.42 714,622 5.85 70,311 0.58 District of Columbia 72,850 25,579,689 351.13 5,254,671 72.13 20,325,018 279.00 Florida 2,671,513 69,659,111 26.07 59,907,962 22.42 9,751,149 3.65 Georgia 1,629,157 58,374,517 35.83 50,639,966 31.08 7,734,551 4.75 Guam 30,986 1,035,317 33.41 1,019,342 32.90 15,974 0.52 Hawaii 180,728 3,434,330 19.00 2,156,891 11.93 1,277,439 7.07 Idaho 267,380 4,047,213 15.14 3,203,514 11.98 843,699 3.16 Illinois 2,118,276 93,398,349 44.09 67,952,413 32.08 25,445,936 12.01
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.txt
  • some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did not take effect until 8/11/2000. 5.81 5.71 1 This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. 5.78 Single-Line Business 5.83 5.81 5.88 5.93 5.93 5.94 5.85 Interstate Per-Line Access Charges Rates in Effect Residential and (Subscriber Line Charges) Charged to End Users 2 Centrex Charged to Long Distance Carriers 3 (Presubscribed Interexchange Carrier Charges) 7 - 15 Table 7.8 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges (National Average in Cents per Minute) 1 Total Charge per Conversation Minute 3 05/26/84 01/14/85 5.24¢ 5.24¢ 3.10¢ 17.26¢ 01/15/85 05/31/85 5.43 5.43
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.txt
  • some companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did not take effect until 8/11/2000. 5.81 5.75 1 This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. 5.78 Single-Line Business 5.83 5.81 5.88 5.93 5.93 5.94 5.85 Interstate Per-Line Access Charges 1 Rates in Effect Residential and (Subscriber Line Charges) Charged to End Users 2 Centrex Charged to Long Distance Carriers 3 (Presubscribed Interexchange Carrier Charges) 1 - 3 Table 1.2 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges (National Average in Cents per Minute) 1 Total Charge per Conversation Minute 3 05/26/84 01/14/85 5.24¢ 5.24¢ 3.10¢ 17.26¢ 01/15/85 05/31/85 5.43
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
  • 13.09 452171 C ARIZONA TELEPHONE CO 6.60 -10.73 19.41 2464.28 452172 C CITZENS-FRNTR-RURAL -1.19 -6.28 5.43 0.00 452173 C TOHONO O'ODHAM UTIL. 3.13 -3.70 7.10 1.90 452174 C SOUTHWESTERN TEL CO -2.52 -8.59 6.64 -11.05 452176 C VALLEY TEL COOP-AZ -5.41 -11.23 6.56 -6.11 452179 C GILA RIVER TELECOM. 7.38 -1.95 9.51 7.96 452191 C ACCIPITER DBA ZONA 8.61 15.36 -5.85 7.59 452200 C FORT MOJAVE TEL, INC -1.42 -4.04 2.73 -5.48 452226 C MIDVALE-AZ 13.63 -8.55 24.26 18.18 452302 C FRONTIER SW-AZ -23.28 -12.97 -11.84 0.00 453334 C TABLE TOP TEL CO 19.60 -4.47 25.20 37.81 454426 C CITZENS-FRNTER-WH MT -2.80 -6.59 4.05 -36.44 Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* NTS Revenue of Requirement Projections in Unseparated High Cost Loop
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.txt
  • 13.09 452171 C ARIZONA TELEPHONE CO 6.60 -10.73 19.41 2464.28 452172 C CITZENS-FRNTR-RURAL -1.19 -6.28 5.43 0.00 452173 C TOHONO O'ODHAM UTIL. 3.13 -3.70 7.10 1.90 452174 C SOUTHWESTERN TEL CO -2.52 -8.59 6.64 -11.05 452176 C VALLEY TEL COOP-AZ -5.41 -11.23 6.56 -6.11 452179 C GILA RIVER TELECOM. 7.38 -1.95 9.51 7.96 452191 C ACCIPITER DBA ZONA 8.61 15.36 -5.85 7.59 452200 C FORT MOJAVE TEL, INC -1.42 -4.04 2.73 -5.48 452226 C MIDVALE-AZ 13.63 -8.55 24.26 18.18 452302 C FRONTIER SW-AZ -23.28 -12.97 -11.84 0.00 453334 C TABLE TOP TEL CO 19.60 -4.47 25.20 37.81 454426 C CITZENS-FRNTER-WH MT -2.80 -6.59 4.05 -36.44 Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* NTS Revenue of Requirement Projections in Unseparated High Cost Loop
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A9.txt
  • companies made adjustments to the tariffs which did not take effect until 8/11/2000. 5.81 5.74 1 This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. 5.78 5.75 Single-Line Business 5.83 5.81 5.88 5.93 5.93 5.94 5.85 Interstate Per-Line Access Charges 1 Rates in Effect Residential and (Subscriber Line Charges) Charged to End Users 2 Centrex Charged to Long Distance Carriers 3 (Presubscribed Interexchange Carrier Charges) 7 - 15 Table 7.8 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges (National Average in Cents per Minute) 1 Total Charge per Conversation Minute 3 05/26/84 01/14/85 5.24¢ 5.24¢ 3.10¢ 17.26¢ 01/15/85 05/31/85 5.43
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.txt
  • 0.00 0.18 0.04 07/01/10 06/30/11 5.89 6.19 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.04 07/01/11 06/30/12 5.88 6.13 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.03 Source: Access tariff filings. Interstate Per-Line Access Charges 1 Rates in Effect Residential and (Subscriber Line Charges) Charged to End Users 2 Centrex Charged to Long Distance Carriers 3 (Presubscribed Interexchange Carrier Charges) Single-Line Business 5.83 5.81 5.88 5.93 5.93 5.94 5.85 2 Prior to 1/01/1998, carriers did not charge separate subscriber line charge (SLC) rates for primary and non-primary residential lines. Therefore, the residential and single-line business average SLCs reported prior to 1/01/1998 include all residential SLC charges. The average residential and single-line business SLC rate as of 1/01/98 excludes non-primary residential SLCs. Non-primary SLCs are now reported separately, except for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-302A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-302A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-302A1.txt
  • treaties, conventions, regulations, arrangements, and agreements. At this time, international agreements between and among the United States, Mexico, and Canada concerning the 5.9 GHz spectrum for ITS applications have not been established. Although the agreement with the Canadian Government, "Agreement Concerning the Coordination and Use of Radio Frequencies Above Thirty Megacycles per Second," with Annex, as amended, applies to the 5.85-5.925 GHz band, no agreement is in place for the current ITS allocation. Consequently, licensees may be subject to future agreements with Canada and Mexico and therefore may be subject to further modification. One option would be to propose certain interim requirements for terrestrial licenses along these borders, and to provide that licensees will be subject to the provisions contained within
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.txt
  • 8.13 tbdabcde 21 - 2197206UNE EELs DS1 4.06 tbd 3.66 tbd 3.10 tbd 3.18 tbd 3.99 tbd 21 - 2197401UNE Pltform Basic Port and Loop 7.62 7.58 8.12 7.72 9.37 7.81 7.58 7.59 9.11 7.52 21 - 2197402UNE Pltform Spcl Port and Loop 1.53 7.48 5.18 5.32 7.03 5.66abcde 21 - 2197500Int Connct Trnks 5.62 8.27 5.4910.52 7.1411.41 10.22 7.10 5.85 7.50 21 - 2197601PNP (port out) 2.18 4.00 0.68 4.00 1.55 4.00 3.73 4.00 0.43 4.00 21 - 2197800NXX Code Open not disptchd 1.13 1.38 1.06 1.17 1.19 2.10 1.19abcde 21 - 2198001UNE Line Sharing lp 2w Dig xDSL 14.79 9.56 14.0011.98 10.1714.47 9.8712.83 10.7112.50 22 - 2290300Resale Bus POTS 96.7494.52 96.8195.34 97.0694.47 98.8495.14100.0095.46 22 - 2290400Resale Res POTS 92.7586.58
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.txt
  • in 30 seconds F.6.2 FL (%) 98.70% 98.50% 97.60% 97.90% 96.90% General - Directory Assistance Average Speed to Answer B - 53 Metric Metric Name [SQM Number] May June July August September Number and Disaggregation BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC Notes Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-331 Florida Performance Metric Data F.7.1 FL (seconds) 6.26 6.53 5.85 5.03 5.79 % Answered in 20 seconds F.7.2 FL (%) 93.00% 92.20% 93.90% 95.60% 94.10% General - Billing Usage Data Delivery Accuracy F.9.1 Region (%) 95.22%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%99.70%99.34%99.92%100.00% Usage Data Delivery Timeliness F.9.2 Region (%) 94.93%97.64%99.33%99.38%97.81%99.56%99.00%97.94%99.83%99.64% Usage Data Delivery Completeness F.9.3 Region (%) 97.21%99.95%99.92%99.91%99.10%99.91%99.65%99.98%99.92%99.95% Mean Time to Deliver Usage F.9.4 Region (days) 4.34 2.52 3.24 2.43 3.60 2.31 3.34 2.21 3.41 2.29
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A1.txt
  • new rulemaking in response to a petition for rulemaking filed by Iridium Satellite LLC (Iridium). In its petition, Iridium requests that we revise our current rules to require MSS systems operating in the 1615.5-1621.35 MHz band to use time division/frequency division multiple access (TDMA/FDMA) technology, rather than code division multiple access (CDMA) technology. In effect, Iridium requests that we make 5.85 megahertz of MSS spectrum currently used by Globalstar L.P. (Globalstar), which uses CDMA technology, available to Iridium, which uses TDMA/FDMA technology. We tentatively conclude that a rebalancing of spectrum in the Big LEO band would serve the public interest and seek comment on the proposal in Iridium's petition and on various alternative uses for the Big LEO spectrum, including whether
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A1_Erratum.doc
  • new rulemaking in response to a petition for rulemaking filed by Iridium Satellite LLC (Iridium). In its petition, Iridium requests that we revise our current rules to require MSS systems operating in the 1615.5-1621.35 MHz band to use time division/frequency division multiple access (TDMA/FDMA) technology, rather than code division multiple access (CDMA) technology. In effect, Iridium requests that we make 5.85 megahertz of MSS spectrum currently used by Globalstar L.P. (Globalstar), which uses CDMA technology, available to Iridium, which uses TDMA/FDMA technology. We tentatively conclude that a rebalancing of spectrum in the Big LEO band would serve the public interest and seek comment on the proposal in Iridium's petition and on various alternative uses for the Big LEO spectrum, including whether
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-162A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-162A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-162A1.txt
  • a notification letter has been filed with the Commission and listing the appropriate technical and contact information. We require pre-operational construction and testing operations be in compliance with all appropriate technical rules including section 25.255 relating to procedures for resolving possible harmful interference. In addition, we require MSS licensees engaging in pre-operational build-out and testing to comply with sections 5.83, 5.85(c), 5.111 and 5.117 of the Commissions rules relating to experimental operations. Public notice requirement Finally, we require that the Commission place on notice for public comment any initial application for authority to add an ATC component to an eligible satellite network. We find that the public interest is best served by ensuring that applications for ATC authority are subject to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-324A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-324A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-324A1.txt
  • applications and adopted basic technical rules for DSRC operations. The Government's Radiolocation Service (i.e., for use by high-powered military radar systems) and non-Government Fixed Satellite Service (FSS) uplink operations are co-primary in the 5.9 GHz band. Additionally, Amateur Radio Services have a secondary allocation in the 5.9 GHz band and Industrial, Scientific and Medical (ISM) devices may operate in the 5.85-5.875 GHz portion. Subsequent to the Commission's allocation of the 5.9 GHz band to the mobile service for use by DSRC systems, ITS America, as the FAC to DOT, began to hold stakeholder workshops, panel discussions, and other industry meetings to develop a consensus on how to achieve national interoperability in the deployment of DSRC-based ITS user services. The Federal Highway
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-100A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-100A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-100A1.txt
  • FSS earth station. We tentatively conclude that existing uplink transmissions from FSS earth stations in other bands could be used for this purpose. We reach this conclusion because the FSS stations that we seek to protect - whose operations in the 3650-3700 MHz band are used for downlink purposes - are also used for uplink (earth-to-space transmit) communications in the 5.85-5.925 GHz and 6.425-6.723 GHz bands. Therefore, we propose to require that unlicensed devices be designed with the ability to listen for an FSS uplink signal in these other bands in order to enable automatic EIRP adjustment. We further propose that, if the non-fixed device detects an uplink signal above a minimum power-switching detection threshold of -76 dBm referenced to a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-134A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-134A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-134A1.txt
  • its frequency assignments on a regional basis. Cornell University contends that the incidence of harmful interference will depend on the proximity of Iridium's transmissions to the 1610.6-1613.8 MHz RAS band, the number of separate channels used by Iridium and the density of Iridium's traffic. Cornell University further argues that the Commission only should grant Iridium use of part of the 5.85 megahertz of spectrum in the frequencies farthest away from the RAS band, and that any assignment of closer frequencies should be conditioned on results of tests performed to determine the impact of such an assignment. Subsequently, Cornell University filed a supplemental letter which stated that Iridium's current use of additional spectrum under the STA did not cause the harmful interference
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-194A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-194A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-194A1.txt
  • Currently, the Big LEO bands are occupied by one CDMA MSS system, Globalstar and one TDMA MSS system, Iridium. The Commission currently has no application before it for any new Big LEO MSS system. Big LEO Spectrum Sharing Notice. In 2003, the Commission issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in response to a Petition for Rulemaking filed by Iridium, requesting 5.85 megahertz of additional spectrum for Iridium to use in the CDMA portion of the Big LEO L-band. The Commission noted that it had ``left open the possibility of providing an opportunity for additional MSS entry in the Big LEO spectrum'' in the Big LEO Order. In seeking comment on the issue of spectrum reallocation or reassignment, the Commission stated that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-248A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-248A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-248A1.txt
  • authorized the TDMA licensee to operate in the 1621.35-1626.5 MHz band. Three of the CDMA space station licenses were later surrendered. Only two Big LEO licensees remain: Globalstar, which operates a CDMA system, and Iridium, which operates a TDMA system. In 2003, the Commission initiated a rulemaking proceeding in response to a petition for rulemaking filed by Iridium, requesting that 5.85 megahertz of additional spectrum in the CDMA portion of the Big LEO L-band be reassigned for use by Iridium. The Commission noted that it had ``left open the possibility of providing an opportunity for additional MSS entry in the Big LEO spectrum'' in the Big LEO Order. In seeking comment on the issue of spectrum reallocation or reassignment, the Commission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-197A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-197A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-197A1.txt
  • systems. § 5.65 Defective applications. § 5.67 Amendment or dismissal of applications. § 5.69 License grants that differ from applications. § 5.71 License period. § 5.73 Experimental report. § 5.77 Change in equipment and emission characteristics. § 5.79 Transfer and assignment of station authorization for conventional experimental radio licenses. § 5.81 Discontinuance of station operation. § 5.84 Non-interference basis. § 5.85 Frequencies and policy governing their assignment. § 5.91 Notification of the National Radio Astronomy Observatory. § 5.95 Informal objections. § 5.101 Frequency stability. § 5.103 Types of emission. § 5.105 Authorized bandwidth. § 5.107 Transmitter control requirements. § 5.109 Inspection and maintenance of antenna structure marking and associated control equipment. § 5.110 Power limitations. § 5.111 Limitations on use. §
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-183A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-183A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-183A1.txt
  • that wish to provide service to or from the United States are required to be licensed by the Commission, but FSS operators are not required to be regulated as common carriers or broadcasters and generally deal with their customers on an individualized basis. TABLE III.3 PRIMARY DOMESTIC GSO FSS BANDS Space-to-earth (GHz) Earth-to-space (GHz) Band Designation 3.7-4.2 5.925-6.425 C-band 3.625-3.700 5.85-5.925 6.425-6.700 Extended C-band (international use only) 11.7-12.2 14-14.5 Ku-band 10.7-11.7 12.7-13.25 13.75-14.00 Extended Ku-band (international use only) 18.3-18.8 19.7-20.2 28.35-28.6 29.5-30.0 29.25-29.5 Ka-band (GSO) 18.8-19.3 28.6-29.1 Ka-band (NGSO) FSS operators are the largest satellite operators, and the FSS sector is dominated by Intelsat and SES. The global fixed-satellite industry is comprised of approximately 40 commercial firms - with fleet sizes
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-183A1_Rcd.pdf
  • that wish to provide service to or from the United States are required to be licensed by the Commission, but FSS operators are not required to be regulated as common carriers or broadcasters and generally deal with their customers on an individualized basis. TABLE III.3 PRIMARY DOMESTIC GSO FSS BANDS57 Space-to-earth (GHz) Earth-to-space (GHz) Band Designation 3.7­4.2 5.925­6.425 C-band 3.625-3.700 5.85-5.925 6.425-6.700 Extended C-band (international use only) 11.7­12.2 14­14.5 Ku-band 10.7-11.7 12.7-13.25 13.75-14.00 Extended Ku-band (international use only) 18.3­18.8 19.7-20.2 28.35-28.6 29.5-30.0 29.25-29.5 Ka-band (GSO) 18.8-19.3 28.6-29.1 Ka-band (NGSO) 37. FSS operators are the largest satellite operators, and the FSS sector is dominated by Intelsat and SES. The global fixed-satellite industry is comprised of approximately 40 commercial firms58 ­ with fleet
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-305A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-305A1.pdf
  • of the United States ("U.S.") Congress and the Department of Transportation to improve the efficiency of the Nation's transportation infrastructure and will facilitate the growth and development of the ITS industry. BACKGROUND On June 11, 1998, the Commission voted to approve and released the Notice of Proposed Rule Making ("NPRM") in ET Docket No. 98-95 which proposed to allocate the 5.85-5.925 GHz band on a primary basis to the mobile service for use by DSRC-based ITS operations. As discussed in the NPRM, ITS applications rely upon the integration of advanced communications systems and highway infrastructure systems. Communications are an essential component of the backbone of all ITS applications, which rely on the swift and accurate flow of information. While many ITS
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/1998/fcc98119.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/1998/fcc98119.wp
  • United States companies in this emerging industry. B. Legal Basis This action is taken pursuant to Sections 4(i), 7(a), 303(c), 303(f), 303(g), and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. Sections 154(i), 157(a), 303(c), 303(f), 303(g), and 303(r). C. Description and Estimate of the Number of Small Entities to Which the Proposed Rules Will Apply The 5.85-5.925 GHz band is currently available to the U.S. Federal Government for Radiolocation purposes, Fixed Satellite Service licensees for international intercontinental links, amateur radio operators and by various entities using Part 18 Industrial, Scientific and Medical ("ISM") equipment and Part 15 unlicensed device equipment. We note that there are only 45 FSS licenses issued for operation in 5.85-5.925 GHz band and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
  • NA 3.23 NA MR-4 - Trouble Duration Intervals MR-4-01-3341 Mean Time To Repair - Total 9.49 NA 7.61 NA 16.9 NA 18.56 NA 16.73 NA MR-4-02-3341 Mean Time To Repair - Loop Trouble 12.38 NA 8.48 NA 17.72 NA 19.59 NA 17.94 NA MR-4-03-3341 Mean Time To Repair - Central Office Trouble 5.87 NA 4.65 NA 6.13 NA 4.75 NA 5.85 NA MR-4-07-3341 % Out of Service > 12 Hours 40 NA 21.43 NA 54.34 NA 59.56 NA 55.42 NA MR-4-08-3341 % Out of Service > 24 Hours 10 NA 7.14 NA 21.52 NA 28.66 NA 23.03 NA MR-5 - Repeat Trouble Reports Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-118 B-22 Metric Metric September October November December January Notes Number Name VZ CLEC
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/data/bandplans/39band.pdf
  • (TLM) Land Mobile (TLM & TLC) MOBILE SA T. (Space to Earth) MARITIME MOBILE SA T. (Space to Earth) Mobile(Aero. TLM) MOBILE SA TELLITE (S-E) MOBILE SA TELLITE (Space to Earth) AERONAUTICAL MOBILE SA TELLITE (R) (space to Earth) 3.0 3.1 3.3 3.5 3.6 3.65 3.7 4.2 4.4 4.5 4.66 4.685 4.8 4.99 5.0 5.25 5.35 5.46 5.47 5.6 5.65 5.85 5.925 6.425 6.525 6.875 7.075 7.125 7.197.235 7.25 7.30 7.45 7.55 7.75 7.90 8.025 8.175 8.215 8.4 8.45 8.5 9.0 9.2 9.3 9.5 10.0 10.45 10.5 10.5510.6 10.68 10.7 11.7 12.2 12.7 12.75 13.2513.4 14.0 14.2 14.4 14.5 14.7145 15.1365 15.35 15.415.7 16.6 17.1 17.2 17.3 17.717.8 18.6 18.8 19.7 20.2 21.2 21.4 22.022.21 22.5 22.55 23.0 23.55 23.6 24.024.05
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2002/fcc02331.pdf
  • in 30 seconds F.6.2 FL (%) 98.70% 98.50% 97.60% 97.90% 96.90% General - Directory Assistance Average Speed to Answer B - 53 Metric Metric Name [SQM Number] May June July August September Number and Disaggregation BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC Notes Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-331 Florida Performance Metric Data F.7.1 FL (seconds) 6.26 6.53 5.85 5.03 5.79 % Answered in 20 seconds F.7.2 FL (%) 93.00% 92.20% 93.90% 95.60% 94.10% General - Billing Usage Data Delivery Accuracy F.9.1 Region (%) 95.22%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%99.70%99.34%99.92%100.00% Usage Data Delivery Timeliness F.9.2 Region (%) 94.93%97.64%99.33%99.38%97.81%99.56%99.00%97.94%99.83%99.64% Usage Data Delivery Completeness F.9.3 Region (%) 97.21%99.95%99.92%99.91%99.10%99.91%99.65%99.98%99.92%99.95% Mean Time to Deliver Usage F.9.4 Region (days) 4.34 2.52 3.24 2.43 3.60 2.31 3.34 2.21 3.41 2.29
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • 9.31 37.52 18.76 Arkansas Pine Bluff SBC 24.36 11.79 44.16 22.08 Arkansas West Memphis SBC 30.87 11.38 44.69 22.34 California Anaheim SBC 15.46 5.44 32.43 9.33 California Bakersfield SBC 15.46 5.44 32.43 9.33 California Fresno SBC 15.46 5.44 32.43 9.33 California Long Beach Verizon 25.18 6.03 45.51 9.89 California Los Angeles SBC 17.01 5.99 35.67 10.27 California Oakland SBC 16.62 5.85 34.86 10.03 California Salinas SBC 16.39 5.77 34.38 9.89 California San Bernadino Verizon 24.72 5.92 45.51 9.89 California San Diego SBC 15.04 5.44 32.43 9.33 California San Francisco SBC 15.46 5.44 32.43 9.33 California San Jose SBC 16.23 5.71 34.05 9.80 Colorado Boulder Qwest 23.77 8.18 38.78 19.39 Colorado Colorado Springs Qwest 22.47 7.68 37.53 18.76 Colorado Denver Qwest 23.58
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 911 and Other Charges 2.53 2.42 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service $15.75 $16.28 Cost of a 5-Minute Daytime Call 0.12 0.09 Number of Sample Cities with Message/Measured Service 88 - Basic Connection Charge $39.57 $40.00 Additional Connection Charge for Touch-Tone Service 0.12 0.00 Taxes 2.70 2.37 Total Connection Charge $42.39 $42.37 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block 5.85 0.00 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan $3.61 $3.95 1 Rate reflects universal service fund pass-through charges. 2 Where a rate exists for fewer than 95 cities the median represents the midpoint rate for those cities which have the service offering. Table 1.1 Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas (As of October 15, 2002) 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • Subscriber Line Charges 5.78 6.00 Taxes, 911 and Other Charges 3.39 3.06 Total Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service $16.70 $16.94 Cost of a 5-Minute Daytime Call 0.10 0.08 Number of Sample Cities with Message/Measured Service 95 - Basic Connection Charge 1 $39.35 $40.00 Taxes 1.41 2.81 Total Connection Charge $40.76 $42.81 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed 5.85 0.00 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan $3.64 $3.95 1 Rate includes additional monthly charges for touch-tone service. 2 Where a rate exists for fewer than 95 cities, the median represents the midpoint rate for those cities which have the service offering. 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 1 2003
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 3.32 3.32 Total Connection Charge $49.25$47.55$46.60$47.26$47.15$45.57$45.01$44.92$44.46$43.58$43.70$43.67$43.74$43.95 $44.10 $42.95 $41.16 $42.54 $42.59 Additional Charge if Drop Line and Connection Block Needed a1 a1 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 12.13 12.45 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 3.98 1 Revised. 2 Subject to revision. 3 Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone, business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate service. 4
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • 1.75 4.453.303.30 6.15 4.95 4.95 6.70 5.50 5.50 February 1, 1946 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.201.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 4.453.303.30 5.55 4.45 4.45 6.70 5.50 5.50 March 1, 1952 0.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.251.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 3.952.852.85 5.55 4.45 4.45 6.70 5.50 5.50 October 1, 1953 0.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 2.20 4.303.303.30 5.90 4.80 4.80 7.05 5.85 5.85 September 19, 19590.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 2.20 4.253.253.25 4.95 3.85 3.85 6.45 4.90 4.90 April 4, 1963 0.450.450.45 0.550.550.55 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 1.65 4.253.252.10 4.95 3.85 2.65 6.45 4.90 2.75 February 1, 1965 0.450.450.45 0.550.550.55 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 1.65 4.252.752.10 4.95 3.25 2.55 6.45 4.30 2.75 April 1, 1965 0.450.450.45 0.550.550.55 1.051.051.05
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 1.75 4.453.303.30 6.15 4.95 4.95 6.70 5.50 5.50 February 1, 1946 0.200.200.20 0.350.350.35 1.051.051.05 1.201.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 4.453.303.30 5.55 4.45 4.45 6.70 5.50 5.50 March 1, 1952 0.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.251.051.05 2.201.20 1.20 2.801.75 1.75 3.952.852.85 5.55 4.45 4.45 6.70 5.50 5.50 October 1, 1953 0.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 2.20 4.303.303.30 5.90 4.80 4.80 7.05 5.85 5.85 September 19, 19590.250.250.25 0.500.500.50 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 2.20 4.253.253.25 4.95 3.85 3.85 6.45 4.90 4.90 April 4, 1963 0.450.450.45 0.550.550.55 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 1.65 4.253.252.10 4.95 3.85 2.65 6.45 4.90 2.75 February 1, 1965 0.450.450.45 0.550.550.55 1.051.051.05 1.601.101.10 2.201.65 1.65 3.152.20 1.65 4.252.752.10 4.95 3.25 2.55 6.45 4.30 2.75 April 1, 1965 0.450.450.45 0.550.550.55 1.051.051.05
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
  • TOTAL AMERICAN TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO. PUBLIC SWITCHED NETWORK: 8.61 PRIVATE LINE: 8.67 NATIONAL EXCHANGE CARRIER ASSOCIATION 12.40% 11.94% 16.87% - - - 12.88% 1ILLINOIS BELL 10.30 11.83 7.91 8.37 (69.23) 14.00 10.13 2INDIANA BELL TELEPHONE 13.99 11.99 14.35 13.37 14.08 17.91 15.77 3MICHIGAN BELL TELEPHONE 10.17 12.30 6.41 8.66 194.18 8.31 9.60 4OHIO BELL TELEPHONE 12.16 12.36 11.64 7.69 5.85 17.49 12.22 5WISCONSIN BELL INC. 12.90 11.98 14.97 12.96 25.69 12.77 13.05 6BELL ATLANTIC 11.91 11.65 11.13 11.53 30.72 13.77 12.65 7SOUTH CENTRAL BELL TELEPHONE CO.-ALABAMA 13.51 11.93 7.90 15.46 6.13 22.45 18.89 8SOUTH CENTRAL BELL TELEPHONE CO.-KENTUCKY 12.36 12.33 8.37 15.53 (15.26) 13.76 14.33 9SOUTH CENTRAL BELL TELEPHONE CO.-LOUISIANA 12.11 12.18 5.24 15.48 31.30 16.77 16.27 10SOUTH CENTRAL BELL
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-95.pdf
  • Bell Operating Multiline End User Non-Lifeline Single Multiline Non-Lifeline Single Multiline Business Rate % of LinesBusiness Rate Access SOCC 2.19 SOCC 2.19 SOCC 2.19 Adjusted Adjusted Adjusted Bell Operating State-Wide (millions) ALABAMA 1,471,624 58,279 438,635 1,608,060 63,682 479,301 6.00 80.75 6.00 $105 ARIZONA 1,619,548 42,803 566,272 1,727,138 45,647 603,891 6.00 93.46 6.00 118 ARKANSAS 666,500 29,621 211,953 869,761 38,654 276,592 5.85 68.98 5.90 58 CALIFORNIA 9,663,576 533,245 6,313,104 9,813,015 541,491 6,410,731 4.61 79.70 4.89 811 COLORADO 1,513,814 55,981 631,929 1,581,793 58,495 660,306 6.00 95.70 6.00 116 CONNECTICUT 1,351,545 69,930 482,190 1,364,902 70,621 486,955 0.00 0.00 6.00 95 DELAWARE 313,077 13,276 147,007 313,077 13,276 147,007 6.00 100.00 6.00 24 DC 276,251 7,554 553,584 276,251 7,554 553,584 2.09 100.00 2.09 21 FLORIDA 6,493,537
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-96.pdf
  • N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A ARIZONA 408 435 1.67 434 127 308 ARKANSAS 162 213 0.82 212 61 151 CALIFORNIA 2,395 2,433 9.33 2,427 852 1,575 COLORADO 466 487 1.87 486 125 360 CONNECTICUT 386 390 1.49 389 99 290 DELAWARE 82 82 0.31 82 25 57 DIST. OF COLUMBIA 163 163 0.63 163 30 132 FLORIDA 1,502 1,525 5.85 1,522 490 1,032 GEORGIA 662 780 2.99 779 236 543 HAWAII 134 134 0.51 134 33 100 IDAHO 132 146 0.56 145 31 114 ILLINOIS 1,024 1,051 4.03 1,048 339 709 INDIANA 488 511 1.96 510 160 350 IOWA 216 258 0.99 257 72 186 KANSAS 206 245 0.94 244 74 171 KENTUCKY 295 381 1.46 380 99 282 LOUISIANA
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-97.pdf
  • Multiline Multiline Multiline Estimated Allocation SLC Business Rate Business Rate Business Rate SLC PercentageUSF & TRS Bell Operating Other Price Cap State-Wide (Millions) (Millions) Per Month Per Month Per Month ALABAMA $6.49 $6.81 $6.49 $117 1.43 $117 ALASKA N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A ARIZONA 6.40 6.85 6.41 143 1.75 144 ARKANSAS 5.99 6.75 6.11 64 0.79 65 CALIFORNIA 4.59 5.85 4.86 855 10.46 858 COLORADO 7.01 0.00 6.96 145 1.77 146 CONNECTICUT 0.00 6.00 6.00 103 1.26 103 DELAWARE 5.26 0.00 5.26 26 0.31 26 DIST. OF COLUMBIA 2.72 0.00 2.72 29 0.35 29 FLORIDA 6.49 6.26 6.39 530 6.49 532 GEORGIA 6.49 7.46 6.41 241 2.95 242 HAWAII 0.00 6.13 6.12 33 0.41 34 IDAHO 6.54 6.75 6.55 35
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • Month per Line) 1 Rates in Effect 1 This table shows average rates (weighted by access lines) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. Residential and Single-Line Business Centrex Charged to Long Distance Carriers 3 (Presubscribed Interexchange Carrier Charges) (Subscriber Line Charges) 5.85 5.93 5.93 Charged to End Users 2 5.88 5.94 1 - 3 Table 1.2 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges (National Average in Cents per Minute) 1 Total Charge per Conversation Minute 3 05/26/84 01/14/85 5.24¢ 5.24¢ 3.10¢ 17.26¢ 01/15/85 05/31/85 5.43 5.43 3.10 17.66 06/01/85 09/30/85 4.71 4.71 3.10 16.17 10/01/85 05/31/86 4.33 4.33 3.10 15.38 06/01/86 12/31/86 3.04 4.33 3.10
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd98.pdf
  • 9.00 6.75 1974 3.60 3.60 6.75 5.10 9.00 6.75 9.00 6.75 9.00 7.50 9.00 6.75 1975 3.60 3.60 6.75 5.10 9.00 6.75 9.00 6.75 9.00 7.50 9.00 6.75 1976 3.60 3.60 6.75 5.10 9.00 6.75 9.00 6.75 9.00 7.50 9.00 6.75 1977 3.60 3.60 6.75 5.10 9.00 6.75 9.00 6.75 9.00 7.50 9.00 6.75 1978 4.50 3.60 6.00 4.80 7.80 5.85 9.00 6.75 7.05 5.55 9.00 6.75 1979 4.50 3.60 6.00 4.80 7.35 5.55 7.35 5.55 7.05 5.55 7.35 5.55 1980 4.80 3.75 6.30 5.10 7.80 5.85 7.80 5.85 7.80 5.70 7.80 5.85 1981 3.00 2.40 4.05 3.15 4.95 3.75 4.95 3.75 4.50 3.60 4.95 3.75 1982 4.60 2.77 5.03 3.02 7.38 4.43 7.38 4.43 5.13 4.43 6.34 3.81 1983 4.60
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd99.pdf
  • 9.00 6.75 1974 3.60 3.60 6.75 5.10 9.00 6.75 9.00 6.75 9.00 7.50 9.00 6.75 1975 3.60 3.60 6.75 5.10 9.00 6.75 9.00 6.75 9.00 7.50 9.00 6.75 1976 3.60 3.60 6.75 5.10 9.00 6.75 9.00 6.75 9.00 7.50 9.00 6.75 1977 3.60 3.60 6.75 5.10 9.00 6.75 9.00 6.75 9.00 7.50 9.00 6.75 1978 4.50 3.60 6.00 4.80 7.80 5.85 9.00 6.75 7.05 5.55 9.00 6.75 1979 4.50 3.60 6.00 4.80 7.35 5.55 7.35 5.55 7.05 5.55 7.35 5.55 1980 4.80 3.75 6.30 5.10 7.80 5.85 7.80 5.85 7.80 5.70 7.80 5.85 1981 3.00 2.40 4.05 3.15 4.95 3.75 4.95 3.75 4.50 3.60 4.95 3.75 1982 4.60 2.77 5.03 3.02 7.38 4.43 7.38 4.43 5.13 4.43 6.34 3.81 1983 4.60
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • 4.64 -9.54 -18.52 613020 C ACS - NORTHLAND SITKA -2.21 7.72 -9.22 -20.45 613022 C ACS - ALASKA GREATLAND -14.48 -3.61 -11.28 0.00 613023 C UNITED UTILITIES INC. 3.50 6.29 -2.62 -3.32 613023A C UNITED UTILITIES INC. (ATEAC) Exchanges acquired from 611449 ATEAC, INC. 613025 C YUKON TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. 2.34 -4.44 7.10 5.13 613026 A NORTH COUNTRY TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.85 3.54 2.24 2.14 613028 C SUMMIT TEL & TEL CO OF ALASKA 7.75 17.28 -8.12 5.76 TOTAL: AMERICAN SAMOA 27.70 3.48 23.40 INFINITE 673900 C AMERICAN SAMOA TELECOMMUNICATIONS AUTHORITY 27.70 3.48 23.40 INFINITE TOTAL: ARIZONA 3.24 -1.39 4.70 11.88 452169 C SAN CARLOS APACHE TELECOMM. UTILITY, INC. 3.57 19.57 -13.38 -1.75 452171 C ARIZONA TEL. CO. 2.54 3.54 -0.97 -5.21
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 2.11 2.44 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 2.70 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 42.39 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.61 n.a.: not available *Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. Table 7.6 Average Residential Rates for Local Service in Urban Areas, 1986-2002 (As of October 15) 7
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 6.99 239 2.23 284 Iowa 991,360 75,287 415,696 5.02 5.31 6.34 96 0.90 114 Kansas 802,409 78,956 344,027 5.17 5.29 6.26 81 0.75 96 Kentucky 1,169,871 63,882 420,476 5.46 6.78 8.07 123 1.14 146 Louisiana 1,519,105 182,311 593,101 5.50 6.98 7.95 172 1.60 205 Maine 488,002 39,507 187,305 5.50 6.42 7.79 53 0.49 63 Maryland 2,026,572 417,126 1,123,956 5.31 5.84 5.85 237 2.21 282 Massachusetts 2,195,609 338,724 1,196,803 5.50 6.42 7.50 279 2.60 331 Michigan 2,992,007 315,260 1,690,877 5.21 5.53 5.97 329 3.07 391 Minnesota 1,748,180 181,347 775,977 5.03 5.18 6.11 174 1.62 206 Mississippi 887,814 65,364 316,152 5.50 6.98 7.94 94 0.88 112 Missouri 1,929,263 226,647 706,992 5.21 5.46 6.59 191 1.78 227 Montana 357,282 25,963 149,885 5.50 7.00 9.20
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-2.pdf
  • 3.50 3.18 0.00 1.75 1.59 3.50 10.00 8.82 3.50 13.50 12.00 Utah 8.25 8.25 8.25 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 10.00 10.00 10.00 13.50 13.50 13.49 Vermont 8.20 8.25 8.21 2.70 3.50 3.48 1.35 1.75 1.74 9.55 10.00 9.95 12.25 13.50 13.43 Virginia 7.16 8.25 7.72 0.00 3.50 2.97 0.00 1.75 1.48 7.16 10.00 9.21 7.16 13.50 12.17 Washington 5.85 8.25 7.89 0.00 3.50 1.73 0.00 1.75 0.87 5.85 10.00 8.76 5.85 13.50 10.49 West Virginia 6.50 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 2.67 0.00 1.75 1.33 6.50 10.00 9.58 6.50 13.50 12.25 Wisconsin 6.82 8.25 7.23 0.00 3.50 1.22 0.00 1.75 0.61 6.82 10.00 7.84 6.82 13.50 9.06 Wyoming 8.25 8.25 8.25 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 10.00 10.00 10.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • NORTHERN MICHIGAN, INC. -31.84 -1.12 -31.07 -78.61 310708 C LENNON TEL. CO. 7.30 -4.62 12.49 15.72 310711 C MIDWAY TEL. CO. -8.77 -9.38 0.67 -10.44 310713 C HIAWATHA COMMUNICATIONS, INC. -4.66 2.10 -6.62 -30.72 310714 C OGDEN TEL. CO. -1.86 -0.83 -1.04 -7.26 310717 C ONTONAGON COUNTY TEL. CO. 1.89 -6.48 8.95 22.40 310720 C PENINSULA TEL. CO.-MI -7.68 -1.94 -5.85 -22.40 310721 C PIGEON TEL. CO. 18.91 2.11 16.46 55.45 310725 A SAND CREEK TEL. CO. 7.44 -3.78 11.66 92.87 310726 C SHIAWASSEE TEL. CO. 1.49 0.17 1.31 -5.55 310728 C SPRINGPORT TEL. CO. -0.95 -0.40 -0.55 -9.22 310732 C UPPER PENINSULA TEL. CO. -0.98 -0.40 -0.58 -4.57 310734 C WALDRON TEL. CO. -1.13 0.00 -1.13 -4.91 310735 A WESTPHALIA
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
  • 2.32 2.30 2.29 2.30 2.33 2.44 2.36 2.46 2.38 2.57 2.53 2.81 1.33 1.41 Total Connection Charge 49.25 47.55 46.60 47.26 47.15 45.57 45.01 44.92 44.46 43.58 43.70 43.67 43.74 43.95 44.10 42.95 41.16 40.76 Additional Charge If Drop Line and Connection Block Needed n.a. n.a. 6.04 6.07 6.89 6.89 6.50 7.29 6.74 5.90 5.74 5.65 5.64 5.86 5.84 5.84 5.85 5.85 Lowest-Cost Inside Wiring Maintenance Plan 0.58 0.85 0.89 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.25 1.31 1.45 1.52 1.78 1.68 2.22 2.66 3.03 3.62 3.62 3.64 n.a.: not available * Revised estimates. **Subject to revision. ***Rate is based upon flat-rate service where available, and measured/message service with 100 five-minute, same-zone business-day calls elsewhere. Beginning in 2001, all rates reflect flat-rate service. ****Beginning
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-9.pdf
  • 6.71 5.49 8.09 6.07 7.88 7.56 6.40 5.79 4.21 Small Business 8.94 10.94 12.33 7.43 9.12 7.64 10.97 10.24 7.81 Large Business 6.80 NA 9.42 6.49 7.81 NA 2.63 1.84 2.30 Repairs:Residential 10.08 6.45 11.45 7.59 9.93 11.91 21.95 20.39 12.69 Small Business 8.24 8.33 11.62 6.36 6.58 9.25 15.97 10.43 9.38 Large Business 6.62 NA 8.91 5.07 5.97 NA 5.85 1.55 2.25 Business Office: Residential 8.68 1.78 9.62 5.49 9.10 7.75 7.47 7.25 6.90 Small Business 14.52 3.93 10.04 6.83 7.05 9.75 8.25 8.36 8.58 Large Business 8.92 NA 5.69 3.61 5.06 NA 6.09 4.45 9.73 NA: Not available Table 9.4 Customer Perception Surveys - Percent of Customers Dissatisfied Bell Companies - 2003 Please refer to text for notes and
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • 18.23 5.88 11.66 80.63 351113 A BROOKLYN MUTUAL TEL. CO. 1.01 3.48 -2.39 0.00 351114 A THE BURT TEL. CO. 12.62 1.48 10.98 74.12 351115 A BUTLER-BREMER MUT. TEL. CO. 8.59 3.22 5.20 45.40 351118 A CASCADE TEL. CO. 5.74 3.44 2.22 12.99 351119 A CASEY MUTUAL TEL. CO. 14.92 3.84 10.67 75.57 351121 A CENTER JUNCTION TEL. CO., INC. -5.85 0.00 -5.85 -21.38 351125 A CENTRAL SCOTT TEL. 4.69 4.02 0.64 0.00 351126 A CENTURYTEL OF CHESTER, INC. -1.49 0.45 -1.94 -7.59 3 - 196 Table 3.28 High-Cost Loop Fund Percentage Changes from 1998 to 1999 by Study Area Unseparated Universal Study Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Service Fund Area NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • 18.63 429 752 877 1,279 North Carolina 230,733 NA 1.55 36 63 73 107 North Dakota * 14,900 0.12 3 5 6 8 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Ohio 308,213 NA 2.07 48 84 98 142 Oklahoma 102,456 NA 0.69 16 28 32 47 Oregon 99,326 NA 0.67 15 27 31 46 Pennsylvania 870,618 NA 5.85 135 236 276 402 Puerto Rico * 37,200 0.29 7 12 14 20 Rhode Island * 29,400 0.23 5 9 11 16 South Carolina 89,263 NA 0.60 14 24 28 41 South Dakota * 18,400 0.15 3 6 7 10 Tennessee 222,917 NA 1.50 34 61 71 103 Texas 1,764,676 NA 11.87 273 479 559 815 Utah 129,384 NA 0.87
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/95socc.pdf
  • 212.8 135.5 321.16 12.04 8.89 1984 92.8 244.2 150.1 373.83 12.71 10.16 1985 94.4 229.9 133.4 410.12 11.37 8.01 1986 95.3 222.6 116.1 399.36 9.02 6.39 1987 100.0 293.6 166.5 410.52 9.38 6.85 1988 104.4 354.3 217.3 455.49 9.71 7.68 1989 106.0 348.1 206.8 507.40 9.26 8.80 1990 106.0 371.7 231.2 532.61 9.32 7.95 1991 104.3 374.2 240.8 528.39 8.77 5.85 1992 107.6 406.4 263.4 546.60 8.14 3.80 1993 112.0 464.3 300.5 586.73 7.22 3.30 1994 118.1 531.2 335.9 638.37 7.97 4.93 1995 121.9 598.9 380.1 NA 7.59 5.93 STATISTICS OF COMMUNICATIONS COMMON CARRIERS TABLE 6.10-SELECTED ECONOMIC INDICATORS, 1950-1995--CONTINUED (FIGURES SHOWN IN THOUSANDS) CIVILIAN LABOR FORCE 6/ TOTAL NUMBER U.S. TOTAL OF HOUSING YEAR POPULATION 5/ TOTAL EMPLOYED HOUSEHOLDS 7/ STARTS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/96socc.pdf
  • 212.8 135.5 321.16 12.04 8.89 1984 92.8 244.2 150.1 373.83 12.71 10.16 1985 94.4 229.9 133.4 410.12 11.37 8.01 1986 95.3 222.6 116.1 399.36 9.02 6.39 1987 100.0 293.6 166.5 410.52 9.38 6.85 1988 104.4 354.3 217.3 455.49 9.71 7.68 1989 106.0 348.1 206.8 507.40 9.26 8.80 1990 106.0 371.7 231.2 532.61 9.32 7.95 1991 104.3 374.2 240.8 528.39 8.77 5.85 1992 107.6 406.4 263.4 546.60 8.14 3.80 1993 112.0 464.3 300.5 586.73 7.22 3.30 1994 118.1 531.2 335.9 638.37 7.97 4.93 1995 121.9 598.9 380.2 NA 7.59 5.93 1996 125.8 639.9 406.8 NA 7.37 5.42 260 STATISTICS OF COMMUNICATIONS COMMON CARRIERS TABLE 6.11-SELECTED ECONOMIC INDICATORS, 1950-1996--CONTINUED (FIGURES SHOWN IN THOUSANDS) CIVILIAN LABOR FORCE 6/ TOTAL NUMBER U.S. TOTAL OF HOUSING
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/97socc.pdf
  • 212.8 135.5 321.16 12.04 8.89 1984 86.6 244.2 150.1 373.83 12.71 10.16 1985 88.0 229.9 133.4 410.12 11.37 8.01 1986 89.0 222.6 116.1 399.36 9.02 6.39 1987 93.2 293.6 166.5 410.52 9.38 6.85 1988 97.4 354.3 217.3 455.49 9.71 7.68 1989 99.1 348.1 206.8 507.40 9.26 8.80 1990 98.9 371.7 231.2 532.61 9.32 7.95 1991 97.0 374.2 240.8 528.39 8.77 5.85 1992 100.0 406.4 263.4 546.60 8.14 3.80 1993 103.6 465.4 300.2 586.73 7.22 3.30 1994 109.2 535.1 348.5 638.37 7.97 4.93 1995 114.5 635.6 424.6 NA 7.59 5.93 1996 118.5 680.2 454.1 NA 7.37 5.42 1997 124.5 734.4 488.3 NA 7.27 - 262 STATISTICS OF COMMUNICATIONS COMMON CARRIERS TABLE 6.11-SELECTED ECONOMIC INDICATORS, 1950-1997--CONTINUED (FIGURES SHOWN IN THOUSANDS) CIVILIAN LABOR FORCE
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/98SOCC.PDF
  • TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 37.12% 62.88% 7.36 5.40 13.67% SBC COMMUNICATIONS INC. 16NEVADA BELL 26.63% 73.37% 4.03 2.99 6.73% 17PACIFIC BELL 43.77% 56.23% 3.92 2.76 8.54% 18THE SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE CO. 36.98% 63.02% 2.82 2.24 4.97% 19SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO. 40.05% 59.95% 5.36 3.85 9.35% 20U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 40.12% 59.88% 5.19 3.48 9.69% 21CINCINNATI BELL TELEPHONE CO. 42.36% 57.64% 5.85 4.22 9.92% 22ALIANT COMMUNICATIONS CO. 0.00% 100.00% 19.96 12.85 16.99% ALLTEL CORPORATION: 23ALLTEL CAROLINA, INC. 42.51% 57.49% 7.67 5.16 NA 24ALLTEL GEORGIA COMMUNICATIONS CORP. 36.72% 63.28% 8.13 5.67 12.05% 25ALLTEL PENNSYLVANIA, INC. 34.61% 65.39% 7.36 5.12 12.07% 26THE WESTERN RESERVE TELEPHONE CO. 41.52% 58.48% 7.44 5.29 14.37% 27CITIZENS TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO. OF NEW YORK, INC. 80.80% 19.20% 24.92 16.59 6.35% 28COMMONWEALTH
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/99socc.pdf
  • 231.4 154.1 321.16 12.04 8.89 1984 86.6 266.0 172.0 373.83 12.71 10.16 1985 88.0 255.2 158.7 410.12 11.37 8.01 1986 89.0 243.4 136.9 399.36 9.02 6.39 1987 93.2 314.6 187.5 410.52 9.38 6.85 1988 97.4 381.9 244.8 455.49 9.71 7.68 1989 99.1 376.7 235.3 507.40 9.26 8.80 1990 98.9 401.5 260.9 532.61 9.32 7.95 1991 97.0 416.1 282.6 528.39 8.77 5.85 1992 100.0 451.6 308.4 546.60 8.14 3.80 1993 103.4 510.4 345.0 586.73 7.22 3.30 1994 109.1 573.4 386.7 638.37 7.97 4.93 1995 114.4 668.5 457.5 - 7.59 5.93 1996 119.4 726.3 502.7 - 7.37 5.42 1997 127.1 795.9 557.6 - 7.26 5.62 1998 132.4 781.9 541.7 - 6.53 - 1999 137.1 848.5 589.1 - 7.04 - 208 STATISTICS OF COMMUNICATIONS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/1998/fcc98119.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/1998/fcc98119.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/1998/fcc98119.wp
  • United States companies in this emerging industry. B. Legal Basis This action is taken pursuant to Sections 4(i), 7(a), 303(c), 303(f), 303(g), and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. Sections 154(i), 157(a), 303(c), 303(f), 303(g), and 303(r). C. Description and Estimate of the Number of Small Entities to Which the Proposed Rules Will Apply The 5.85-5.925 GHz band is currently available to the U.S. Federal Government for Radiolocation purposes, Fixed Satellite Service licensees for international intercontinental links, amateur radio operators and by various entities using Part 18 Industrial, Scientific and Medical ("ISM") equipment and Part 15 unlicensed device equipment. We note that there are only 45 FSS licenses issued for operation in 5.85-5.925 GHz band and
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
  • NA 3.23 NA MR-4 - Trouble Duration Intervals MR-4-01-3341 Mean Time To Repair - Total 9.49 NA 7.61 NA 16.9 NA 18.56 NA 16.73 NA MR-4-02-3341 Mean Time To Repair - Loop Trouble 12.38 NA 8.48 NA 17.72 NA 19.59 NA 17.94 NA MR-4-03-3341 Mean Time To Repair - Central Office Trouble 5.87 NA 4.65 NA 6.13 NA 4.75 NA 5.85 NA MR-4-07-3341 % Out of Service > 12 Hours 40 NA 21.43 NA 54.34 NA 59.56 NA 55.42 NA MR-4-08-3341 % Out of Service > 24 Hours 10 NA 7.14 NA 21.52 NA 28.66 NA 23.03 NA MR-5 - Repeat Trouble Reports Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-118 B-22 Metric Metric September October November December January Notes Number Name VZ CLEC