FCC Web Documents citing 11.56

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-109A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-109A1.pdf
  • and geographically targeted EAS messages, as aggregated and delivered by the state governor or his/her designee, or by FEMA on behalf of such state governor, upon approval by the Commission of an applicable state plan providing for delivery of such alerts no sooner than 180 days after adoption of CAP by FEMA... [(a)(1) and a(2) manet] (1) Add new § 11.56 as follows: § 11.56 EAS Participants receive CAP-formatted alerts Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, all EAS Participants must be able to receive CAP-formatted EAS alerts no later than 180 days after FEMA publishes the technical standards and requirements for such FEMA transmissions. APPENDIX D Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-166A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-166A1.pdf
  • specifications available. This is similar to Commission's adoption of rules requiring all EAS Participants to be able to receive CAP formatted EAS alerts no later than 180 days after FEMA publishes the technical standards and requirements for such FEMA transmissions. See Review of the Emergency Alert System, 22 FCC Rcd 13275, 13310 and Appendix C; see also 47 C.F.R. § 11.56. That Order became effective 30 days after publication in the Federal Register, or 60 days after Congress's receipt of a Congressional Review Act report, except that new or modified information collections did not become effective prior to OMB approval. We note that our adoption of an effective date and compliance deadline have no impact on the WARN Act's requirement that
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-99A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-99A1.pdf
  • Gateway functions. This is similar to Commission's adoption of rules requiring all EAS Participants to be able to receive CAP formatted EAS alerts no later than 180 days after FEMA publishes the technical standards and requirements for such FEMA transmissions. See Review of the Emergency Alert System, 22 FCC Rcd 13275, 13310 and Appendix C; see also 47 C.F.R. § 11.56. That Order also became effective 30 days after publication in the Federal Register, except that new or modified information collections did not become effective prior to OMB approval. We note that our adoption of an effective date and compliance deadline have no impact on the WARN Act's requirement that CMS providers notify the Commission whether or not they intend to
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-191A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-191A1.pdf
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Review of the Emergency Alert System ) ) ) ) ) EB Docket No. 04-296 ORDER Adopted: November 18, 2010 Released: November 23, 2010 By the Commission: Commissioner McDowell issuing a statement. introduction Section 11.56 of our rules states in relevant part that ``all EAS Participants must be able to receive CAP-formatted EAS alerts no later than 180 days after FEMA publishes the technical standards and requirements for such FEMA transmissions'' (the CAP reception requirement). In this order, for the reasons set forth herein, we waive pursuant to section 1.3 of our rules the 180-day
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-82A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-82A1.pdf
  • the extent feasible, what explicit performance objectives should we specify to facilitate monitoring the success of any potential course of action? B. Obligation to Accept CAP Messages The Commission also stated in the Second Report and Order that it would maintain the existing EAS system, including the EAS Protocol. The general obligation to receive CAP-formatted messages is codified in section 11.56 of the rules. As detailed below, CSRIC and the parties responding to the Part 11 Public Notice proposed several additional Part 11 rule revisions to fully codify the obligation to receive CAP messages. These proposals covered CAP-to-SAME protocol translation, CAP monitoring, Next Generation EAS, equipment requirements, and miscellaneous related issues. CAP-Formatted Message Translation to SAME As indicated above, the Second
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-87A7.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-87A7.txt
  • 0.75 Greece 49.32 50.87 51.61 52.22 Grenada 24.23 24.34 Not Available 26.28 Guatemala 2.72 3.13 4.08 4.08 Hong Kong, China 53.25 54.69 56.54 55.77 Hungary 21.12 26.06 30.42 33.59 Iceland 55.48 57.61 61.69 64.65 India 1.29 1.54 1.86 2.20 Indonesia 1.69 2.13 2.47 2.70 Ireland 36.53 39.48 41.14 43.47 Israel 41.77 44.09 44.98 47.11 Italy 43.33 44.01 44.68 45.07 Jamaica 11.56 14.17 Not Available 16.57 Japan 48.80 48.92 47.86 50.26 Kenya 0.79 0.82 0.81 0.92 Korea 41.47 43.04 44.40 43.27 Kyrgyz Republic 7.92 7.47 7.56 7.64 Latvia 27.85 29.55 30.16 30.16 Luxembourg 56.50 59.16 66.87 69.17 Malaysia 16.56 18.32 19.49 19.76 ATTACHMENT 6 TELEDENSITY IN WTO SIGNATORIES ATTACHMENT 6 (continued) WTO SIGNATORY TELEDENSITY 1995 1996 1997 1998 Mauritius 13.11 16.21 19.52
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A4.txt
  • TVMovie 1,456 0.98Movie 158 0.11 TalkShow 3,773 2.54Music 2,960 1.99 News 1,218 0.82 Other 629 0.42 Outdoor 5,877 3.95 PublicAffairs 2,230 1.50 Reality 5,236 3.52 Religious 1,750 1.18 Shopping 1,388 0.93 Sitcom 13,668 9.19 Spanish 1,817 1.22 Sports 8,468 5.69 Violent 1,298 0.87 Weather 132 0.09 Total 148,724100.00Total 148,724100.00 Source:TMSandauthorcalculations.SeeTable3forallocationofTMSProgramTypestoEstimationProgram Types(i.e.theProgramTypesusedinthisstudy).SeeTables29-31forallocationofTMSCategoriestoEstimation Categories(i.e.theCategoriesusedinthisstudy). 33 Table5:BroadcastNetworksintheEstimationDataset ProgramType Number Share MajorBroadcastNetworks ABC 183 11.56 CBS 185 11.69 NBC 187 11.81 FOX 168 10.61 CW 93 5.87 MNT 74 4.67 IndependentandPublic"Networks" IND1 86 5.43 IND2 40 2.53 IND3 20 1.26 IND4 12 0.76 IND5 9 0.57 IND6 5 0.32 IND7 3 0.19 IND8 1 0.06 IND9 1 0.06 PBS1 181 11.43 PBS2 91 5.75 PBS3 40 2.53 PBS4 22 1.39 PBS5 6 0.38 PBS6 4
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-54A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-54A1.txt
  • 78% 4778 5195 51.30 152 Salt Lake City-Ogden, UT-ID 1,916,057 2,448,334 78% 2226 2206 35.68 148 Idaho Falls, ID-WY 267,684 343,546 78% 2388 2415 10.85 75 Tupelo, MS-AL-TN 487,767 626,217 78% 5275 5418 49.76 56 Toledo, OH 995,020 1,278,090 78% 3258 3181163.94 2 Portland, ME 606,679 782,159 78% 2493 2488 98.56 120 Grand Island, NE 219,818 284,318 77% 5989 6418 11.56 118 Omaha, NE-IA-MO 843,909 1,094,029 77% 2128 2146 62.40 111 Minot, ND 81,125 105,378 77% 4117 3977 7.00 106 Rochester, MN-IA-WI 257,296 334,227 77% 2799 3058 55.65 166 Eugene-Springfield, OR-CA 648,151 842,355 77% 1850 1858 43.10 150 Boise City, ID-OR 537,005 699,836 77% 2703 2679 13.69 8 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY-PA 1,114,362 1,452,472 77% 3222 3052212.89 157 El Paso, TX-NM 792,413
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-916A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-916A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-916A1.txt
  • Fifth Report and Order in the above-referenced docket. This means any necessary equipment must be installed and operational by that date. For further information regarding this requirement, please contact Tom Beers, Chief, Policy Division, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau, (202) 418-0952; or Gregory Cooke, Associate Chief, Policy Division, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau, (202) 418-2351. 47 C.F.R. § 11.56 (a). 47 C.F.R. Part 11. See Review of the Emergency Alert System; Independent Spanish Broadcasters Association, the Office of Communication of the United Church of Christ, Inc., and the Minority Media and Telecommunications Council, Petition for Immediate Relief; Randy Gehman Petition for Rulemaking, EB Docket 04-296, Fifth Report and Order, 27 FCC Rcd 642 (2012) (Fifth Report and Order), reconsideration
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • Total Other Investment ($000) - 2005 11 - 27 Study Area State Code Subject to Separations Interstate Intrastate Percent Interstate Verizon New England - New Hampshire NH $18,922 $5,529 $10,192 53.86 Verizon New Jersey NJ (2,130,841) (2,156,178) 182,122 (8.55) Sprint - United Telephone Company of New Jersey NJ 8,992 6,926 5,178 57.58 Qwest - New Mexico NM 111,294 107,887 12,867 11.56 Valor Telecommunications of Texas - New Mexico 1 NM 3,336 2,107 1,540 46.16 Valor Telecommunications of Texas - New Mexico 2 NM 165 (198) 659 399.39 Citizens Telecom. of New York - Red Hook NY 7,898 5,717 2,181 27.61 Citizens Telecom. of New York - Upstate NY 130,450 94,429 36,021 27.61 Citizens Telecom. of New York - Western Counties NY
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A13.txt
  • Total Other Investment ($000) - 2005 11 - 27 Study Area State Code Subject to Separations Interstate Intrastate Percent Interstate Verizon New England - New Hampshire NH $18,922 $5,529 $10,192 53.86 Verizon New Jersey NJ (2,130,841) (2,156,178) 182,122 (8.55) Sprint - United Telephone Company of New Jersey NJ 8,992 6,926 5,178 57.58 Qwest - New Mexico NM 111,294 107,887 12,867 11.56 Valor Telecommunications of Texas - New Mexico 1 NM 3,336 2,107 1,540 46.16 Valor Telecommunications of Texas - New Mexico 2 NM 165 (198) 659 399.39 Citizens Telecom. of New York - Red Hook NY 7,898 5,717 2,181 27.61 Citizens Telecom. of New York - Upstate NY 130,450 94,429 36,021 27.61 Citizens Telecom. of New York - Western Counties NY
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • -0.01 -17.20 361399 C GRANADA TEL. CO. -0.63 -6.28 6.02 0.00 361401 A HALSTAD TEL. CO. 21.44 18.81 2.21 20.32 361403 A FEDERATED UTILITIES, INC. DBA HANCOCK TEL. CO 2.51 2.78 -0.26 -16.25 361404 A HARMONY TEL. CO. 0.07 -3.36 3.55 1.53 361405 A HILLS TEL. CO., INC.-MN 2.66 -1.77 4.51 4.67 361408 A HOME TEL. CO.-MN -0.14 -0.45 0.31 -11.56 361409 A HUTCHINSON TELEPHONE COMPANY -2.05 -4.16 2.20 0.00 361410 C JOHNSON TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.67 -0.73 3.43 2.96 361412 A KASSON & MANTORVILLE TEL. CO. 7.97 6.49 1.39 -12.28 361413 A MID STATE TEL. CO. DBA KMP TEL. CO. 0.23 -3.11 3.45 1.43 361414 C LAKEDALE TELEPHONE COMPANY -4.02 -3.07 -0.98 0.00 361419 A LISMORE COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE CO. 1.09 -2.97
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • -0.01 -17.20 361399 C GRANADA TEL. CO. -0.63 -6.28 6.02 0.00 361401 A HALSTAD TEL. CO. 21.44 18.81 2.21 20.32 361403 A FEDERATED UTILITIES, INC. DBA HANCOCK TEL. CO 2.51 2.78 -0.26 -16.25 361404 A HARMONY TEL. CO. 0.07 -3.36 3.55 1.53 361405 A HILLS TEL. CO., INC.-MN 2.66 -1.77 4.51 4.67 361408 A HOME TEL. CO.-MN -0.14 -0.45 0.31 -11.56 361409 A HUTCHINSON TELEPHONE COMPANY -2.05 -4.16 2.20 0.00 361410 C JOHNSON TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.67 -0.73 3.43 2.96 361412 A KASSON & MANTORVILLE TEL. CO. 7.97 6.49 1.39 -12.28 361413 A MID STATE TEL. CO. DBA KMP TEL. CO. 0.23 -3.11 3.45 1.43 361414 C LAKEDALE TELEPHONE COMPANY -4.02 -3.07 -0.98 0.00 361419 A LISMORE COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE CO. 1.09 -2.97
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • CO.-JESUP 6.74 -1.27 8.11 231.03 351172 A>CFARMERS MUTUAL TEL. CO.-NORA SPRINGS 37.85 -3.68 43.13 176.61 351173 A FARMERS MUTUAL TEL. COOP.-SHELLSBURG -4.58 -3.66 -0.96 -32.23 351174 A FARMERS MUTUAL TEL. CO.-STANTON -15.39 -3.33 -12.47 -49.03 351175 A FARMERS TEL. CO.-BATAVIA -13.94 -2.07 -12.12 -48.52 351176 A FARMERS TEL. CO.-ESSEX -5.29 -9.90 5.11 -7.30 351177 A FARMERS TEL. CO.-RICEVILLE -14.35 -3.16 -11.56 -48.28 351178 C IOWA TELECOMM. SVCS. DBA IOWA TELECOM 4.90 -5.27 10.74 0.00 351179 A FENTON COOP. TEL. CO. -15.65 -1.83 -14.07 -49.20 351187 C PARTNER COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -26.01 -3.08 -23.66 -55.84 351187A C PARTNER COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -10.00 -3.82 -6.42 -100.00 351188 A GOLDFIELD TEL. CO. -7.52 -2.52 -5.13 -39.98 351189 A RIVER VALLEY TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOP. -13.05 -4.94 -8.54 -45.54
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • CO.-JESUP 6.74 -1.27 8.11 231.03 351172 A>CFARMERS MUTUAL TEL. CO.-NORA SPRINGS 37.85 -3.68 43.13 176.61 351173 A FARMERS MUTUAL TEL. COOP.-SHELLSBURG -4.58 -3.66 -0.96 -32.23 351174 A FARMERS MUTUAL TEL. CO.-STANTON -15.39 -3.33 -12.47 -49.03 351175 A FARMERS TEL. CO.-BATAVIA -13.94 -2.07 -12.12 -48.52 351176 A FARMERS TEL. CO.-ESSEX -5.29 -9.90 5.11 -7.30 351177 A FARMERS TEL. CO.-RICEVILLE -14.35 -3.16 -11.56 -48.28 351178 C IOWA TELECOMM. SVCS. DBA IOWA TELECOM 4.90 -5.27 10.74 0.00 351179 A FENTON COOP. TEL. CO. -15.65 -1.83 -14.07 -49.20 351187 C PARTNER COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -26.01 -3.08 -23.66 -55.84 351187A C PARTNER COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE -10.00 -3.82 -6.42 -100.00 351188 A GOLDFIELD TEL. CO. -7.52 -2.52 -5.13 -39.98 351189 A RIVER VALLEY TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOP. -13.05 -4.94 -8.54 -45.54
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
  • -100.00 442141 C SANTA ROSA TEL COOP 12.11 -5.49 18.62 21.34 442143 C SOUTH PLAINS TEL 1.37 -3.57 5.12 -7.99 442147 C WINDSTREAM SUGARLAND -7.24 -7.21 -0.03 0.00 442150 C TATUM TEL CO -0.26 -5.59 5.65 -5.41 442151 C TAYLOR TEL CO-OP INC 8.57 -3.24 12.21 18.29 442153 C TEXAS WINDSTREAM -6.68 -4.88 -1.89 0.00 442154 C GTE-SW VERIZON-TX -44.49 -11.56 -37.23 0.00 442159 C VALLEY TEL CO-OP -TX 1.29 -8.05 10.16 2.02 442166 C WEST TEXAS RURAL TEL -11.24 -3.92 -7.62 -20.75 442168 C WES-TEX TEL CO-OP -1.06 -6.39 5.69 -3.11 442170 C XIT RURAL TEL CO-OP 0.85 -4.41 5.51 -0.04 442262 C ENMR TEL COOP-TX -9.34 -6.47 -3.07 -50.61 TOTAL UTAH -3.46 -11.46 9.03 -0.28 500758 C DIRECTCOMM-CEDAR VAL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.txt
  • -100.00 442141 C SANTA ROSA TEL COOP 12.11 -5.49 18.62 21.34 442143 C SOUTH PLAINS TEL 1.37 -3.57 5.12 -7.99 442147 C WINDSTREAM SUGARLAND -7.24 -7.21 -0.03 0.00 442150 C TATUM TEL CO -0.26 -5.59 5.65 -5.41 442151 C TAYLOR TEL CO-OP INC 8.57 -3.24 12.21 18.29 442153 C TEXAS WINDSTREAM -6.68 -4.88 -1.89 0.00 442154 C GTE-SW VERIZON-TX -44.49 -11.56 -37.23 0.00 442159 C VALLEY TEL CO-OP -TX 1.29 -8.05 10.16 2.02 442166 C WEST TEXAS RURAL TEL -11.24 -3.92 -7.62 -20.75 442168 C WES-TEX TEL CO-OP -1.06 -6.39 5.69 -3.11 442170 C XIT RURAL TEL CO-OP 0.85 -4.41 5.51 -0.04 442262 C ENMR TEL COOP-TX -9.34 -6.47 -3.07 -50.61 TOTAL UTAH -3.46 -11.46 9.03 -0.28 500758 C DIRECTCOMM-CEDAR VAL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.txt
  • 1.75 9.74 13.24 8.02 3.50 1.75 9.77 13.28 8.00 3.50 1.75 9.75 13.25 Maryland 7.36 3.41 1.71 9.07 12.48 7.40 3.50 1.75 9.15 12.65 7.40 3.49 1.75 9.15 12.64 Massachusetts 8.10 3.50 1.75 9.85 13.35 8.10 3.50 1.75 9.85 13.35 8.10 3.50 1.75 9.85 13.35 Michigan 7.26 2.22 1.11 8.38 10.60 7.47 2.83 1.41 8.88 11.71 7.44 2.75 1.37 8.81 11.56 Minnesota 7.21 1.74 0.87 8.08 9.82 7.14 0.61 0.31 7.45 8.06 7.21 1.70 0.85 8.06 9.76 Mississippi 8.25 3.34 1.67 9.92 13.26 8.25 3.48 1.74 9.99 13.47 8.25 3.43 1.71 9.97 13.39 Missouri 7.32 3.48 1.74 9.06 12.54 7.15 2.67 1.34 8.48 11.15 7.24 3.12 1.56 8.81 11.93 Montana 8.25 2.47 1.24 9.49 11.96 8.25 3.50 1.75 10.00 13.50 8.25
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-168A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-168A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-168A1.txt
  • 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. We make a small downward adjustment to the two megahertz offset because while Nextel is giving up all of its spectrum holdings at 816-817/861-862 MHz, our records indicate that there are seventeen EA licenses in this band licensed to parties other than Nextel, which these licensees are not required to relinquish. Accordingly, in calculating the MHz-pop (11.56 million pops) value of the two megahertz of spectrum given up by Nextel, we have deducted the population of those non-Nextel EAs from the calculation. Kane Reece Report at Table 7. See Sun Fire Study. The Sun Fire valuation is based on Nextel's acquisition of Chadmoore Communications. Although this transaction is a useful data point, we do not believe it
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-168A1_Erratum.doc
  • 47 C.F.R. § 1.17. We make a small downward adjustment to the two megahertz offset because while Nextel is giving up all of its spectrum holdings at 816-817/861-862 MHz, our records indicate that there are seventeen EA licenses in this band licensed to parties other than Nextel, which these licensees are not required to relinquish. Accordingly, in calculating the MHz-pop (11.56 million pops) value of the two megahertz of spectrum given up by Nextel, we have deducted the population of those non-Nextel EAs from the calculation. Kane Reece Report at Table 7. See Sun Fire Study. The Sun Fire valuation is based on Nextel's acquisition of Chadmoore Communications. Although this transaction is a useful data point, we do not believe it
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-216A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-216A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-216A1.txt
  • 41.01% 14.36 149 Twin Falls, ID 84,477 162,397 52.02% 2448 43.96% 14.08 150 Boise City, ID-OR 304,405 574,876 52.95% 2285 47.64% 13.69 139 Santa Fe, NM 126,983 258,790 49.07% 2855 44.21% 13.06 126 Western Oklahoma, OK 64,654 139,761 46.26% 3032 41.54% 12.04 138 Amarillo, TX-NM 233,841 481,633 48.55% 1579 44.91% 11.79 120 Grand Island, NE 147,025 288,047 51.04% 6566 35.13% 11.56 136 Hobbs, NM-TX 75,534 190,340 39.68% 3850 34.52% 11.21 148 Idaho Falls, ID-WY 170,065 306,120 55.56% 2566 45.49% 10.85 146 Missoula, MT 183,193 399,183 45.89% 4546 38.67% 10.79 110 Grand Forks, ND-MN 101,995 230,253 44.30% 3996 38.64% 10.16 135 Odessa-Midland, TX 190,603 388,007 49.12% 3461 42.52% 10.13 129 San Angelo, TX 85,352 202,679 42.11% 2254 39.37% 10.05 140 Pueblo, CO-NM
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-142A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-142A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-142A1.txt
  • OK 1,022,155 1,698,197 60% 2574 61% 3714 65.04 157 El Paso, TX-NM 577,453 955,602 60% 2403 49% 2131 33.04 65 Elkhart-Goshen, IN-MI 551,262 936,245 59% 2436 50% 2197 185.73 79 Montgomery, AL 283,576 481,137 59% 2196 68% 1724 66.86 91 Fort Smith, AR-OK 194,148 329,136 59% 3860 51% 3655 46.51 120 Grand Island, NE 168,676 288,047 59% 9043 55% 6654 11.56 115 Rapid City, SD-MT-NE-ND 126,199 213,696 59% 4688 52% 4672 5.04 6 Syracuse, NY-PA 1,111,128 1,902,640 58% 3667 51% 3461 104.74 7 Rochester, NY-PA 865,630 1,493,518 58% 4017 52% 3530 167.21 8 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY-PA 879,395 1,507,759 58% 2980 51% 2597 212.89 61 Traverse City, MI 165,381 286,745 58% 4220 54% 4192 50.67 72 Paducah, KY-IL 128,444 226,586 57% 5630
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-109A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-109A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-109A1.txt
  • and geographically targeted EAS messages, as aggregated and delivered by the state governor or his/her designee, or by FEMA on behalf of such state governor, upon approval by the Commission of an applicable state plan providing for delivery of such alerts no sooner than 180 days after adoption of CAP by FEMA... [(a)(1) and a(2) manet] (1) Add new § 11.56 as follows: § 11.56 EAS Participants receive CAP-formatted alerts Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, all EAS Participants must be able to receive CAP-formatted EAS alerts no later than 180 days after FEMA publishes the technical standards and requirements for such FEMA transmissions. APPENDIX D Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-166A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-166A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-166A1.txt
  • specifications available. This is similar to Commission's adoption of rules requiring all EAS Participants to be able to receive CAP formatted EAS alerts no later than 180 days after FEMA publishes the technical standards and requirements for such FEMA transmissions. See Review of the Emergency Alert System, 22 FCC Rcd 13275, 13310 and Appendix C; see also 47 C.F.R. § 11.56. That Order became effective 30 days after publication in the Federal Register, or 60 days after Congress's receipt of a Congressional Review Act report, except that new or modified information collections did not become effective prior to OMB approval. We note that our adoption of an effective date and compliance deadline have no impact on the WARN Act's requirement that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-28A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-28A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-28A1.txt
  • 2988 3122 98.64 61 Traverse City, MI 200,731 303,189 66% 4390 4220 50.67 91 Fort Smith, AR-OK 226,769 345,853 66% 4053 3860 46.51 117 Sioux City, IA-NE-SD 166,250 251,204 66% 3911 3671 39.51 169 Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, WA 489,277 742,672 66% 2537 2583 27.68 165 Redding, CA-OR 240,566 362,763 66% 2347 2325 14.36 120 Grand Island, NE 188,640 287,280 66% 6418 9043 11.56 110 Grand Forks, ND-MN 147,363 223,433 66% 3880 3922 10.16 112 Bismarck, ND-MT-SD 116,421 177,241 66% 4819 4838 6.26 92 Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR-MO-OK 315,261 483,254 65% 4316 3960 88.43 95 Jonesboro, AR-MO 198,169 304,222 65% 5195 4773 51.30 113 Fargo-Moorhead, ND-MN 246,837 379,861 65% 3145 3008 16.40 140 Pueblo, CO-NM 186,852 288,249 65% 2583 2654 8.71 47 Lexington, KY-TN-VA-WV 1,210,556 1,905,583
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-99A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-99A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-99A1.txt
  • Gateway functions. This is similar to Commission's adoption of rules requiring all EAS Participants to be able to receive CAP formatted EAS alerts no later than 180 days after FEMA publishes the technical standards and requirements for such FEMA transmissions. See Review of the Emergency Alert System, 22 FCC Rcd 13275, 13310 and Appendix C; see also 47 C.F.R. § 11.56. That Order also became effective 30 days after publication in the Federal Register, except that new or modified information collections did not become effective prior to OMB approval. We note that our adoption of an effective date and compliance deadline have no impact on the WARN Act's requirement that CMS providers notify the Commission whether or not they intend to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-191A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-191A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-191A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Review of the Emergency Alert System ) ) ) ) ) EB Docket No. 04-296 ORDER Adopted: November 18, 2010 Released: November 23, 2010 By the Commission: Commissioner McDowell issuing a statement. introduction Section 11.56 of our rules states in relevant part that ``all EAS Participants must be able to receive CAP-formatted EAS alerts no later than 180 days after FEMA publishes the technical standards and requirements for such FEMA transmissions'' (the CAP reception requirement). In this order, for the reasons set forth herein, we waive pursuant to section 1.3 of our rules the 180-day
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-81A1_Rcd.pdf
  • 768,870 84% 2556 2282 7.56 6 Syracuse, NY-PA 1,559,887 1,884,621 83% 4002 3884 104.74 33 Sarasota-Bradenton, FL 720,731 871,874 83% 2733 2074 273.56 49 Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN 1,935,674 2,337,216 83% 2247 2225 294.08 66 Fort Wayne, IN 613,053 741,382 83% 3038 3088 158.5 118 Omaha, NE-IA-MO 912,444 1,100,498 83% 3495 2128 62.4 120 Grand Island, NE 236,032 284,487 83% 6672 5989 11.56 157 El Paso, TX-NM 863,810 1,045,239 83% 2370 2050 33.04 158 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ-NM 3,664,125 4,440,500 83% 2683 2108 93.91 159 Tucson, AZ 985,051 1,183,947 83% 2622 2006 60.03 7 Rochester, NY-PA 1,214,616 1,478,494 82% 4389 4247 167.21 68 Champaign-Urbana, IL 513,173 629,200 82% 3378 3265 73.47 91 Fort Smith, AR-OK 286,419 347,505 82% 4121 4114 46.51 94 Springfield, MO 782,275
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-136A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-136A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-136A1.txt
  • Congressional Review Act 26 E. Effective Date of Rule 27 V. Ordering Clauses 28 APPENDIX - Final Rules Introduction This Fourth Report and Order is one of two orders in which we will take additional steps to integrate the Common Alerting Protocol (CAP) into our Part 11 rules governing the Emergency Alert System (EAS). In this Order, we amend section 11.56 of the Commission's EAS rules to require EAS Participants to be able to receive CAP-formatted EAS alerts as required by Part 11 no later than June 30, 2012. We anticipate that we will adopt the CAP-based revisions to our Part 11 EAS rules in a subsequent order stemming from our Third Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (hereinafter ``Third FNPRM'') in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-82A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-82A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-82A1.txt
  • the extent feasible, what explicit performance objectives should we specify to facilitate monitoring the success of any potential course of action? B. Obligation to Accept CAP Messages The Commission also stated in the Second Report and Order that it would maintain the existing EAS system, including the EAS Protocol. The general obligation to receive CAP-formatted messages is codified in section 11.56 of the rules. As detailed below, CSRIC and the parties responding to the Part 11 Public Notice proposed several additional Part 11 rule revisions to fully codify the obligation to receive CAP messages. These proposals covered CAP-to-SAME protocol translation, CAP monitoring, Next Generation EAS, equipment requirements, and miscellaneous related issues. CAP-Formatted Message Translation to SAME As indicated above, the Second
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-41A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-41A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-41A1.txt
  • of text-to-speech and speech-to-text software is best reserved for a separate proceeding, and [that] we therefore defer these issues at this time. In order to avoid imposing the Guide's mandatory approach toward TTS conversions - which would have required EAS Participants to effectuate such conversions using EAS Participant-provided technologies if their EAS devices could support them - we revised section 11.56 of the Commission's rules to preclude application of the Guide's mandatory requirement outright, as follows: (a) On or by June 30, 2012, EAS Participants must have deployed operational equipment that is capable of the following: ... (2) Converting EAS alert messages that have been formatted pursuant to the (i) Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards (OASIS) Common Alerting
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-7A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-7A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-7A1.txt
  • Part 11 rules that would more fully delineate and integrate into the Part 11 rules the CAP-related mandates adopted in the Second Report and Order. The Commission received 30 comments and 12 reply comments in response to the Third FNPRM. Subsequently, on November 18, 2010, we adopted the Fourth Report and Order in this docket, in which we amended section 11.56 of our EAS rules to require EAS Participants to be able to receive CAP-formatted EAS alerts no later than June 30, 2012. discussion In this Fifth Report and Order, we adopt several changes to the Part 11 rules in response to issues and comments raised in the Third FNPRM. The rule revisions we adopt today also streamline Part 11 by
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/data/papersAndStudies/fc99136.pdf
  • 19.72 29.49 17 441.46 20 29.40 16 Aerial Comm. 27.87 27.87 18 836.14 14 27.49 17 US Cellular 25.27 25.27 19 631.67 17 25.27 18 US West 3.56 20.16 23.72 20 237.19 25 23.72 20 Aerforce 21.82 21.82 21 218.18 26 21.55 21 General Wireless 20.38 20.38 22 509.38 18 20.38 22 Comcast (6) 8.26 9.91 18.17 23 305.53 21 11.56 28 Rivgam Comm. 17.32 17.32 24 173.22 29 17.32 23 Telecorp PCS (8) 9.89 4.94 14.83 25 247.15 23 14.83 24 Cook Inlet/WW (SEC) (7) 2.98 9.83 12.81 26 142.95 32 12.81 25 Triton PCS (8) 0.91 11.01 11.92 27 242.90 24 11.92 26 Mercury PCS (PK) 2.50 9.16 11.65 28 129.03 34 11.65 27 Centennial Cellular 7.00 3.77 10.77
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref97.pdf
  • 13.13 13.73 11.96 13.27 14.11 15.78 15.91 15.91 15.23 20.63 San Diego 6.70 8.25 9.25 10.50 10.99 10.63 11.30 10.56 11.80 11.70 11.63 11.58 14.37 San Francisco 7.00 8.25 9.25 10.50 10.99 10.63 11.30 10.56 11.80 11.70 11.63 11.58 14.37 San Jose 7.00 8.25 9.25 10.50 10.99 10.63 11.30 10.56 11.80 11.70 11.63 11.58 14.37 CO Boulder 7.55 8.09 9.59 11.56 14.14 14.19 15.38 15.62 18.40 18.65 18.79 18.96 19.05 Col. Springs 6.51 6.97 8.80 10.24 13.15 13.07 14.20 15.00 18.18 18.32 18.15 18.29 18.37 Denver 7.28 7.80 9.27 11.22 13.82 13.83 14.96 15.67 18.36 18.63 18.57 18.86 18.95 CT Ansonia 9.81 9.81 10.81 11.81 12.41 11.91 12.56 12.06 13.43 13.43 15.77 16.03 17.03 Norwalk 10.94 10.94 11.94 12.94 13.54 13.04
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • 0.0793 45.61 0.95 California Los Angeles SBC 17.51 12.27 0.0729 35.93 0.50 California Oakland SBC 17.13 11.92 0.0729 35.93 0.50 California Salinas SBC 16.91 11.71 0.0729 35.93 0.50 California San Bernadino GTE 23.19 15.72 0.0793 45.61 0.95 California San Diego SBC 16.01 10.85 0.0729 35.93 0.50 California San Francisco SBC 16.01 10.85 0.0729 35.93 0.50 California San Jose SBC 16.76 11.56 0.0729 35.93 0.50 Colorado Boulder US West 21.38 15.82 0.1135 37.54 2.50 Colorado Colorado Springs US West 20.38 14.99 0.1100 36.40 2.50 Colorado Denver US West 21.11 15.57 0.1130 37.56 2.50 Connecticut Ansonia SNET 18.70 13.66 0.1750 47.70 1.35 Connecticut Norwalk SNET 17.60 13.66 0.1750 47.70 1.35 District of ColumbiaWashington Bell Atlantic 19.23 8.34 0.0649 30.76 1.25 Florida Miami BellSouth
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 0.0793 45.61 0.95 California Los Angeles SBC 17.51 12.27 0.0729 35.93 0.50 California Oakland SBC 17.13 11.92 0.0729 35.93 0.50 California Salinas SBC 16.91 11.71 0.0729 35.93 0.50 California San Bernadino GTE 23.19 15.72 0.0793 45.61 0.95 California San Diego SBC 16.01 10.85 0.0729 35.93 0.50 California San Francisco SBC 16.01 10.85 0.0729 35.93 0.50 California San Jose SBC 16.76 11.56 0.0729 35.93 0.50 Colorado Boulder US West 21.39 15.82 0.1135 37.54 2.99 Colorado Colorado Springs US West 20.36 14.97 0.1100 36.40 2.99 Colorado Denver US West 21.40 15.86 0.1130 37.56 2.99 Connecticut Ansonia SNET 18.64 13.61 0.1750 47.70 1.35 Connecticut Norwalk SNET 17.55 13.61 0.1750 47.70 1.35 District of ColumbiaWashington Bell Atlantic 20.10 9.39 0.0649 30.76 1.25 Florida Miami BellSouth
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror02.pdf
  • 16Western Reserve Telephone Company 10.76 11.80 8.07 11.03 (6,091.24) 15.44 11.93 17C-R Telephone Company 9.48 14.94 101.41 3.38 (21.80) (10.76) 18CenturyTel of Midwest-Michigan, Inc./CenturyTel of MI., Inc 15.73 11.25 24.58 27.74 19CenturyTel of Ohio, Inc. 18.43 17.47 18.16 19.55 20CenturyTel of Wisconsin, Inc. 19.24 11.25 25.02 20.11 21Chillicothe Telephone Company, The 15.34 11.25 36.26 11.60 2.81 7.43 22Coastal Untilities, Inc. 11.56 13.03 13.84 9.04 22.13 10.65 23Concord Telephone Co. 16.51 11.78 44.49 14.69 181.82 14.67 14.90 24El Paso Telephone Co. 17.75 9.82 88.57 12.06 14.01 12.20 25Farmers Telephone Cooperative, Inc 11.48 11.78 14.97 7.07 10.08 8.86 26Fort Bend Telephone Co. dba TXU Communications 12.38 12.65 15.54 13.01 4.70 11.01 27Fort Mill Telephone Company 13.80 11.92 21.93 3.91 49.78 18.83 28Gallatin River
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
  • 11.19 10.64 15SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO.-FL 11.57 12.11 5.87 11.97 (20.18) 14.23 12.67 16SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO.-GA 11.98 12.14 9.38 14.05 (8.18) 13.52 13.57 17SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO.-NC 13.42 12.45 13.25 8.97 25.49 20.76 15.19 18SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO.-SC 12.12 12.35 10.01 9.73 (125.36) 18.15 12.71 19NEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY 11.56 12.79 8.27 12.62 105.93 9.85 11.48 20NEW YORK TELEPHONE 10.35 11.83 5.58 12.99 37.25 8.78 11.24 21PACIFIC BELL 13.15 12.39 13.22 13.95 10.92 15.17 14.51 22SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO.-ARKANSAS 12.20 12.31 8.19 11.85 20.52 15.68 14.21 23SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO.-KANSAS 13.75 12.63 11.40 11.73 68.87 18.15 16.21 24SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO.-MISSOURI 13.95 12.42 15.43 11.22 6.48 17.81 14.93 25SOUTHWESTERN BELL
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • 310692 A DRENTHE TEL. CO. 13.42 1.02 12.27 69.56 310694 A FARMERS MUT. OF CHAPIN DBA CHAPIN TEL. CO. 13.51 1.30 12.06 63.17 310695 C VERIZON NORTH INC.-MI -9.22 0.53 -9.70 0.00 310702 C CENTURY TEL. OF MICHIGAN, INC. -3.12 0.31 -3.42 -21.29 310703 A KALEVA TEL. CO. 13.54 1.37 12.01 62.03 310704 C ACE TEL. CO. OF MI, INC. 11.56 -2.48 14.39 64.41 310705 C CENTURY TELEPHONE OF NORTHERN MICHIGAN, INC. 13.64 0.46 13.12 29.52 310708 A>CLENNON TEL. CO. 12.37 -0.44 12.86 23.47 310711 C MIDWAY TEL. CO. 13.76 6.51 6.80 15.35 310713 C HIAWATHA TEL. CO. -2.43 0.62 -3.02 -15.87 310714 C OGDEN TEL. CO. 60.32 1.47 58.00 347.74 310717 C ONTONAGON COUNTY TEL. CO. -1.34 3.92 -5.07 -30.55
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • -2.51 -3.49 1.01 0.00 Delaware 0.35 -1.60 1.98 0.00 District of Columbia -0.91 -2.44 1.57 0.00 Florida -4.19 -2.36 -1.87 -15.68 Georgia 0.29 -3.79 4.23 -11.62 Guam -11.11 -2.02 -9.27 -100.00 Hawaii 0.95 -2.10 3.12 53.42 Idaho 0.73 -2.72 3.55 2.96 Illinois -5.08 -0.30 -4.80 -3.32 Indiana 0.96 -2.07 3.10 14.05 Iowa 0.56 -2.62 3.27 13.46 Kansas -3.79 -5.64 1.96 11.56 Kentucky 4.85 -2.10 7.10 -4.31 Louisiana 2.03 -2.92 5.10 1.39 Maine -2.77 -0.84 -1.95 -19.34 Maryland 0.51 -2.45 3.03 4.64 Massachusetts -0.59 -5.01 4.66 -6.68 Michigan -4.36 2.11 -6.34 0.64 Minnesota 0.44 -4.76 5.46 -5.28 Mississippi 2.99 -2.25 5.37 2.94 Missouri -6.52 -3.08 -3.55 -2.17 Montana 1.29 -2.20 3.56 1.08 Nebraska -0.92 -4.70 3.97 9.03 Nevada 0.07 -0.21 0.28 -7.60
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-4.pdf
  • 16.07 4,634,157 9.54 3,176,330 6.54 Kansas 470,205 10,938,162 23.26 7,405,755 15.75 3,532,407 7.51 Kentucky 654,363 20,805,893 31.80 16,327,977 24.95 4,477,916 6.84 Louisiana 731,328 28,395,765 38.83 24,196,302 33.09 4,199,462 5.74 Maine 205,586 6,421,122 31.23 4,547,280 22.12 1,873,842 9.11 Maryland 860,640 15,664,256 18.20 12,721,326 14.78 2,942,930 3.42 Massachusetts 973,140 43,464,952 44.66 27,600,070 28.36 15,864,882 16.30 Michigan 1,730,668 75,482,862 43.61 55,468,455 32.05 20,014,407 11.56 Minnesota 851,384 22,534,680 26.47 15,523,900 18.23 7,010,780 8.23 Mississippi 493,507 34,681,260 70.28 25,853,380 52.39 8,827,880 17.89 Missouri 909,792 34,278,408 37.68 22,696,819 24.95 11,581,588 12.73 Montana 151,947 3,742,568 24.63 2,997,174 19.73 745,394 4.91 Nebraska 285,095 6,213,033 21.79 5,101,556 17.89 1,111,477 3.90 Nevada 356,814 3,646,426 10.22 2,766,312 7.75 880,115 2.47 New Hampshire 206,847 1,252,763 6.06 814,708 3.94 438,055 2.12 New Jersey 1,341,656
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • 5.48 0.00 361483 C SLEEPY EYE TEL. CO. 0.01 4.36 -4.17 -57.48 361485 A SPRING GROVE COOP TEL CO 3.63 -4.70 8.74 64.30 361487 A STARBUCK TEL. CO. 0.29 1.79 -1.47 0.00 361491 C TWIN VALLEY-ULEN TEL CO INC. -7.44 3.19 -10.30 -15.47 361494 A UPSALA COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE ASSN. 4.36 5.56 -1.13 -51.10 361495 A VALLEY TEL. CO.-MN 15.33 3.39 11.56 77.50 361499 A CROSSLAKE TELEPHONE COMPANY 10.20 6.35 3.62 0.00 361500 A NORTHERN TELEPHONE COMPANY OF MN 5.36 11.76 -5.73 -1.80 3 - 202 Table 3.28 High-Cost Loop Fund Percentage Changes from 1998 to 1999 by Study Area Unseparated Universal Study Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Service Fund Area NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name Requirement
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/fcc99136.pdf
  • 19.72 29.49 17 441.46 20 29.40 16 Aerial Comm. 27.87 27.87 18 836.14 14 27.49 17 US Cellular 25.27 25.27 19 631.67 17 25.27 18 US West 3.56 20.16 23.72 20 237.19 25 23.72 20 Aerforce 21.82 21.82 21 218.18 26 21.55 21 General Wireless 20.38 20.38 22 509.38 18 20.38 22 Comcast (6) 8.26 9.91 18.17 23 305.53 21 11.56 28 Rivgam Comm. 17.32 17.32 24 173.22 29 17.32 23 Telecorp PCS (8) 9.89 4.94 14.83 25 247.15 23 14.83 24 Cook Inlet/WW (SEC) (7) 2.98 9.83 12.81 26 142.95 32 12.81 25 Triton PCS (8) 0.91 11.01 11.92 27 242.90 24 11.92 26 Mercury PCS (PK) 2.50 9.16 11.65 28 129.03 34 11.65 27 Centennial Cellular 7.00 3.77 10.77
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2011/dd110916.html
  • ORDER. (FCC No. 11-133). OET [22]FCC-11-133A1.doc [23]FCC-11-133A1.pdf [24]FCC-11-133A1.txt REVIEW OF THE EMERGENCY ALERT SYSTEM/INDEPENDENT SPANISH BROADCASTERS ASSOCIATION, THE OFFICE OF COMMUNICATION OF THE UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST, INC., AND THE MINORITY MEDIA AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COUNCIL, PETITION FOR IMMEDIATE RELIEF. Took additional steps to integrate the Common Alerting Protocol into the Part 11 rules governing the Emergency Alert System. Amended Section 11.56 of the FCC's EAS rules. by 4th R&O. (Dkt No. 04-296 ). Action by: the Commission. Adopted: 09/15/2011 by R&O. (FCC No. 11-136). PSHSB [25]FCC-11-136A1.doc [26]FCC-11-136A1.pdf [27]FCC-11-136A1.txt CLEARWIRE CORPORATION. Granted the Request for Extension of Time filed by Fixed Wireless Holdings, LLC until March 15, 2012. (Dkt No. 06-136 ). Action by: Deputy Chief, Broadband Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau by