FCC Web Documents citing 15.29

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-321A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-321A1.pdf
  • regarding its distribution of the DM500-S and DM7020-S receivers. In its response dated November 5, 2006, One-O-One included a Declaration of Conformity test report for the DM500-S. One-O-One did not provide a test report for the DM7020-S receiver, and added that to the best of its knowledge, ``there is no FCC certificate available for the DM7020-S.'' Sections 2.936, 2.1076 and 15.29 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R.§§ 2.936, 2.1076 and 15.29, require that documents and/or test samples demonstrating equipment compliance be provided to the Commission upon reasonable request. Neither DreamBox USA nor One-O-One has provided documentation or other proof indicating that the DM7020-S receiver complies with either the Declaration of Conformity or certification requirements for television interface devices as specified in Section
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1658A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1658A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1658A1.txt
  • of existing products. We see no benefits in requiring halting the operation of GPRs and wall imaging systems that already are in the hands of the public and may have been used for several years without causing harmful interference. Accordingly, we are providing a blanket waiver of the Part 15 regulations, with the exception of 47 C.F.R. §§ 15.5(a)-(c), 15.11, 15.29, 15.521(a) and 15.525, for existing GPRs and wall imaging systems. This waiver applies only to those entities that are eligible to operate GPRs and wall imaging systems, as described later in this order under the discussion on ``Operating Restrictions,'' and that have registered their equipment with us, following the procedures shown below. To be included under this blanket waiver, the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-160A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-160A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-160A1.txt
  • be used because of its greater accuracy. When using the ``Zip-plus-4'' data, the City found that Comcast's allocation formula overestimated the DBS penetration rate in the franchise areas (i.e., Comcast determined there was a DBS penetration rate of 22.59 percent in Franchise Area B using the five digit zip codes, while the City found that the penetration rate was only 15.29 percent using the zip-plus-4 method). Although the 15 percent penetration rate is still met, the City argues that such a close margin should be analyzed in greater detail for possible error. The City claims it needs more time to carefully review these discrepancies, and that Comcast's data should not be used in effective competition proceedings because of these errors. The
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-321A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-321A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-321A1.txt
  • regarding its distribution of the DM500-S and DM7020-S receivers. In its response dated November 5, 2006, One-O-One included a Declaration of Conformity test report for the DM500-S. One-O-One did not provide a test report for the DM7020-S receiver, and added that to the best of its knowledge, ``there is no FCC certificate available for the DM7020-S.'' Sections 2.936, 2.1076 and 15.29 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R.§§ 2.936, 2.1076 and 15.29, require that documents and/or test samples demonstrating equipment compliance be provided to the Commission upon reasonable request. Neither DreamBox USA nor One-O-One has provided documentation or other proof indicating that the DM7020-S receiver complies with either the Declaration of Conformity or certification requirements for television interface devices as specified in Section
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1454A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1454A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1454A1.txt
  • 9 6.14 8.64 7 7 SPRINGFIELD-HOLYOKE 110 MA 272,500 100.00% 11 4.79 6.69 3 5 ST. JOSEPH 200 KS 2,900 6.00% 3 2.02 2.02 0 0 MO 45,400 94.00% 9 9.61 9.61 4 0 ST. LOUIS 21 IL 338,300 26.68% 3 4.26 4.42 2 1 MO 929,600 73.32% 7 7.07 10.69 7 7 SYRACUSE 82 NY 394,000 100.00% 10 11.62 15.29 7 8 TALLAHASSEE-THOMASVILLE 105 FL 187,500 65.56% 8 5.29 8.06 4 4 GA 98,500 34.44% 10 6.28 7.08 2 2 Number of Broadcast Stations Licensed to State Household-weighted Number of Stations Carried by DBS DMA DMA Rank State Segment No. of HHs in State Segment % DMA HHs in State Segment Measured by Nielsen Full-Power Stations Only All Full- and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • 15.09 13 GTE North Inc. (Illinois - COIL) 13/ 26.48 24.21 36.34 41.14 14.11 41.03 44.39 14 GTE North Inc. (Indiana - COIN) 13/ 22.44 23.27 29.02 33.26 34.61 41.40 47.71 GTE Midwest Inc. (COIA + COSI = COIT) 13/ 18.31 22.39 30.39 35.04 38.27 34.16 31/ 15 GTE Midwest Inc. (Missouri - COMO+COCM+COEM=COMT) 13/ 10.79 9.57 11.97 12.39 12.56 15.29 17.86 GTE Arkansas, Inc. (COAR+COSA=COAT) 13/ 17.44 18.24 19.13 16.13 15.87 16.81 14/ Contel of Minnesota - COMN 13/ 22.12 23.81 32.38 33.81 30.00 32.07 14/ GSTC - Central (Central Contel) 13/ 11.22 10.24 16.28 16 GTE North Inc. (COPA+COQS=COPT) 15/ 12.79 17.11 22.33 32.60 36.38 40.55 36.83 45.97 39.58 40.98 GTE Alaska, Inc. (Alaska - GTAK) 14.69 14.84 16.13
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • Rate 1 Connection Charge Including Surcharges Including Surcharges City Telephone and Taxes Company Standard Lifeline Standard Link-Up Rates Rates Rates Rates New Mexico Alamogordo Qwest 23.95 5.30 32.27 8.07 New York Binghamton Verizon 31.07 13.84 63.18 5.74 New York Buffalo Verizon 35.16 18.23 64.42 5.86 New York Massena Verizon 29.16 10.51 62.63 5.69 New York New York City Verizon 32.50 15.29 64.53 5.87 New York Ogdensburg Verizon 29.92 10.79 64.28 5.84 New York Rochester Frontier 20.07 8.46 33.32 10.00 North Carolina Raleigh BellSouth 26.66 11.15 45.74 22.88 North Carolina Rockingham BellSouth 24.96 9.45 45.74 22.88 Ohio Canton SBC 22.16 8.64 36.50 0.00 Ohio Cincinnati Cincinnati Bell 23.53 10.37 25.70 0.00 Ohio Cleveland SBC 22.48 8.76 36.50 0.00 Ohio Columbus SBC 22.22
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • - GTVA) 22.83 24.17 (22.01) 1.76 9.53 6.62 9.94 20.56 33 GTE Southwest Inc. dba Verizon Southwest (Texas - COTX) 11.26 11.23 10.05 12.46 11.9 12.17 17.13 14.96 34 GTE Southwest Inc. dba Verizon Southwest (Texas - GTTX) 18.63 18.21 18.74 20.47 24.35 21.65 21.42 16.43 GTE Midwest Inc. (Missouri - COMO + COCM + COEM = COMT) 20.33 17.06 15.29 12.56 GTE Midwest Inc. (Missouri - GTMO) 23.92 19.15 11.82 16.08 GTE Systems of The South (Alabama - COAL) 15.77 14.93 10.88 7.97 % (Final Reports for 1998 Through 2004 and Initial Report for 2005) 1 2003 2004 2005 % Table 4.1 Interstate Rate of Return Summary * Years 1998 through 2005 Price-Cap Companies Reporting FCC Form 492 A 4
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • A NORTH STATE TEL. CO.-NC DBA NORTH STATE COMM. 12.73 -3.50 16.82 0.00 230494 A PINEVILLE TEL. CO. -1.39 -4.23 2.96 -7.14 230495 A RANDOLPH TEL. CO. 1.44 -1.93 3.43 0.00 230496 A RANDOLPH TEL. MEMB. CORP. 1.26 -2.36 3.71 3.63 230497 A PIEDMONT TEL. MEMB. CORP. 0.83 -2.26 3.16 -1.55 230498 C SALUDA MOUNTAIN TEL. CO. 3.81 -2.56 6.53 15.29 3 - 175 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NTS Revenue of Requirement Projections in Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* NORTH CAROLINA (CONT.) 230500 A SERVICE TEL. CO. 1.88 -2.15 4.12 6.86
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • A NORTH STATE TEL. CO.-NC DBA NORTH STATE COMM. 12.73 -3.50 16.82 0.00 230494 A PINEVILLE TEL. CO. -1.39 -4.23 2.96 -7.14 230495 A RANDOLPH TEL. CO. 1.44 -1.93 3.43 0.00 230496 A RANDOLPH TEL. MEMB. CORP. 1.26 -2.36 3.71 3.63 230497 A PIEDMONT TEL. MEMB. CORP. 0.83 -2.26 3.16 -1.55 230498 C SALUDA MOUNTAIN TEL. CO. 3.81 -2.56 6.53 15.29 3 - 175 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NTS Revenue of Requirement Projections in Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* NORTH CAROLINA (CONT.) 230500 A SERVICE TEL. CO. 1.88 -2.15 4.12 6.86
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • 19.98 24.17 (22.01) 1.76 9.53 6.62 9.94 20.56 33 GTE Southwest Inc. dba Verizon Southwest (Texas - COTX) 13.34 11.09 11.23 10.05 12.46 11.9 12.17 17.13 14.96 34 GTE Southwest Inc. dba Verizon Southwest (Texas - GTTX) 16.32 18.38 18.21 18.74 20.47 24.35 21.65 21.42 16.43 GTE Midwest Inc. (Missouri - COMO + COCM + COEM = COMT) 20.33 17.06 15.29 12.56 GTE Midwest Inc. (Missouri - GTMO) 23.92 19.15 11.82 16.08 GTE Systems of The South (Alabama - COAL) 15.77 14.93 10.88 7.97 1998 2004 (Final Reports for 1998 Through 2005 and Initial Report for 2006) 1 % % % % % % % % % 2001 2000 2003 2002 2005 2006 1999 Table 4.1 Interstate Rate of Return Summary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • 0.76 -14.94 190237 A HIGHLAND TEL. COOP.-VA 1.68 -0.84 2.54 0.67 190238 A MGW TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. 3.97 0.94 3.01 4.04 190239 A NEW HOPE TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE -1.78 -2.22 0.45 -17.02 190243 A PEMBROKE TEL. COOP. 0.16 -2.07 2.28 -7.12 190244 C PEOPLES MUTUAL TEL. CO.-VA 2.76 -3.49 6.47 15.90 190248 A SCOTT COUNTY TEL. COOP. INC. 0.49 -0.16 0.65 -15.29 190249 C ROANOKE & BOTETOURT TEL. CO. 0.10 7.28 -6.69 -36.83 190250 A SHENANDOAH TEL. CO. 7.99 0.55 7.40 0.00 190253 A VIRGINIA TEL. CO. 5.45 0.40 5.03 INFINITE 190254 C CENTRAL TEL. CO. OF VA -3.14 -2.37 -0.78 0.00 190479 C VERIZON SOUTH INC.- VA -6.85 -1.65 -5.29 0.00 190567 C UNITED INTER-MOUNTAIN TEL. CO.-VA -4.59 -3.86 -0.77 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • 0.76 -14.94 190237 A HIGHLAND TEL. COOP.-VA 1.68 -0.84 2.54 0.67 190238 A MGW TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. 3.97 0.94 3.01 4.04 190239 A NEW HOPE TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE -1.78 -2.22 0.45 -17.02 190243 A PEMBROKE TEL. COOP. 0.16 -2.07 2.28 -7.12 190244 C PEOPLES MUTUAL TEL. CO.-VA 2.76 -3.49 6.47 15.90 190248 A SCOTT COUNTY TEL. COOP. INC. 0.49 -0.16 0.65 -15.29 190249 C ROANOKE & BOTETOURT TEL. CO. 0.10 7.28 -6.69 -36.83 190250 A SHENANDOAH TEL. CO. 7.99 0.55 7.40 0.00 190253 A VIRGINIA TEL. CO. 5.45 0.40 5.03 INFINITE 190254 C CENTRAL TEL. CO. OF VA -3.14 -2.37 -0.78 0.00 190479 C VERIZON SOUTH INC.- VA -6.85 -1.65 -5.29 0.00 190567 C UNITED INTER-MOUNTAIN TEL. CO.-VA -4.59 -3.86 -0.77 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291889A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291889A1.pdf
  • San Diego, California 92115 ) ) ) ) ) File No.: EB-05-SD-028 Citation No.: C200532940001 CITATION Released: March 11, 2005 By the District Director, San Diego Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to Mr. Larry Kaufman for violation of Section 15.5(b) and 15.29(a) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''). Investigation by the FCC's San Diego Office revealed that on February 28, 2005, a Part 15 device at the residence of Mr. Larry Kaufman in San Diego, California was causing interference to a neighbor's TV and FM radio reception and Mr. Kaufman refused to allow inspection of the offending device. Section 15.5(b) of the Rules
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
  • High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2008 to 2009 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* NTS Revenue of Requirement Projections in Unseparated High Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment INDIANA (CONT.) 320744 A CAMDEN TEL CO - IN 8.57 -6.49 16.11 48.65 320747 C CENTURYTEL-CENTR IN -5.58 -15.29 11.46 -0.91 320750 A FRONTIER OF INDIANA -7.42 -9.68 2.51 0.00 320751 A CITIZENS TEL CORP -1.26 -5.69 4.70 -60.74 320753 C CLAY DBA ENDEAVOR 8.67 -5.39 14.87 22.03 320756 A CRAIGVILLE TEL CO -1.03 -5.80 5.07 -47.35 320759 C DAVIESS-MARTIN/RTC 9.12 -1.49 10.77 11.09 320771 A GEETINGSVILLE TEL CO 9.92 -6.20 17.18 51.21 320772 C FRONTIER NORTH-IN 3.75 -11.26
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.txt
  • High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2008 to 2009 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* NTS Revenue of Requirement Projections in Unseparated High Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment INDIANA (CONT.) 320744 A CAMDEN TEL CO - IN 8.57 -6.49 16.11 48.65 320747 C CENTURYTEL-CENTR IN -5.58 -15.29 11.46 -0.91 320750 A FRONTIER OF INDIANA -7.42 -9.68 2.51 0.00 320751 A CITIZENS TEL CORP -1.26 -5.69 4.70 -60.74 320753 C CLAY DBA ENDEAVOR 8.67 -5.39 14.87 22.03 320756 A CRAIGVILLE TEL CO -1.03 -5.80 5.07 -47.35 320759 C DAVIESS-MARTIN/RTC 9.12 -1.49 10.77 11.09 320771 A GEETINGSVILLE TEL CO 9.92 -6.20 17.18 51.21 320772 C FRONTIER NORTH-IN 3.75 -11.26
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.txt
  • id., we cannot directly compare KPMG's test results against the commercial data Verizon provided, and we decline to find noncompliance on the basis of these test results. See OR 4-06 (Average duration - work completion (SOP) to bill completion). In addition, from September through December, Verizon took more than one business day to update the billing systems for 13.99, 12.84, 15.29, and 11.99 percent of resale orders; and 9.94, 8.38, 10.66, and 5.38 percent of UNE orders. See OR 4-08 (percent SOP to bill completion > 1 business day). Also, in the same time period, Verizon took more than four business days to update its billing systems for only 1.56, 1.07, 1.95, and 0.38 percent of resale orders; and 4.06, 3.61,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-290A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-290A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-290A1.txt
  • as follows: § 15.215 Additional provisions to the general radiated emission limitations. * * * * * (e) Intentional radiators transmitting in the spectrum below 490 kHz with a measured fundamental field strength 40 dB or more below the limits specified in Section 15.209(a) for this band, are subject only to the general conditions of operation in §§ 15.5 and 15.29 and are exempt from the specific technical standards and other requirements contained in this part. The operator of the exempted device shall be required take any steps necessary to stop transmission from the device upon a finding by the Commission or its representative that the device is causing harmful interference. Transmission shall not resume until the condition causing the harmful
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-321A1.html
  • regarding its distribution of the DM500-S and DM7020-S receivers. In its response dated November 5, 2006, One-O-One included a Declaration of Conformity test report for the DM500-S. One-O-One did not provide a test report for the DM7020-S receiver, and added that to the best of its knowledge, "there is no FCC certificate available for the DM7020-S." Sections 2.936, 2.1076 and 15.29 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R.SS 2.936, 2.1076 and 15.29, require that documents and/or test samples demonstrating equipment compliance be provided to the Commission upon reasonable request. Neither DreamBox USA nor One-O-One has provided documentation or other proof indicating that the DM7020-S receiver complies with either the Declaration of Conformity or certification requirements for television interface devices as specified in Section
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.txt
  • id., we cannot directly compare KPMG's test results against the commercial data Verizon provided, and we decline to find noncompliance on the basis of these test results. See OR 4-06 (Average duration - work completion (SOP) to bill completion). In addition, from September through December, Verizon took more than one business day to update the billing systems for 13.99, 12.84, 15.29, and 11.99 percent of resale orders; and 9.94, 8.38, 10.66, and 5.38 percent of UNE orders. See OR 4-08 (percent SOP to bill completion > 1 business day). Also, in the same time period, Verizon took more than four business days to update its billing systems for only 1.56, 1.07, 1.95, and 0.38 percent of resale orders; and 4.06, 3.61,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • Rates Rates Rates Rates State Nebraska Grand Island Qwest 27.85 13.99 37.41 18.71 New Jersey Phillipsburg Verizon 13.59 4.31 44.89 22.45 New Mexico Alamogordo Qwest 18.21 2.58 31.86 7.96 New York Binghamton Verizon 24.62 14.31 61.70 11.22 New York Buffalo Verizon 29.09 18.70 62.82 11.42 New York Massena Verizon 21.22 10.99 61.34 11.15 New York New York City Verizon 25.07 15.29 63.13 11.48 New York Ogdensburg Verizon 21.82 11.30 63.06 11.47 New York Rochester Frontier - Rochester 19.02 9.10 33.32 10.00 North Carolina Raleigh BellSouth 18.82 6.09 44.03 22.02 North Carolina Rockingham BellSouth 17.55 4.81 44.03 22.02 Ohio Canton SBC 19.95 9.45 36.50 0.00 Ohio Cincinnati Cincinnati Bell 23.54 11.18 25.70 0.00 Ohio Cleveland SBC 19.95 9.45 36.50 0.00 Ohio Columbus
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref97.pdf
  • 14.58 13.92 13.92 13.92 13.92 13.96 VA Richmond 11.79 15.22 16.22 17.22 17.32 16.82 17.37 17.09 17.09 17.09 17.67 17.67 17.76 Smithfield 7.05 8.88 9.88 11.26 10.86 11.48 12.13 12.13 11.92 11.92 11.92 11.92 11.92 WA Everett 13.34 13.58 14.58 16.28 16.74 16.74 17.64 17.64 17.64 17.64 16.25 16.25 16.25 Seattle 12.50 12.89 13.89 15.00 14.22 14.10 15.00 15.46 15.37 15.29 16.01 15.96 15.16 WV Huntington 16.80 19.42 24.39 25.39 25.99 25.99 25.50 25.50 25.50 25.50 25.50 25.50 25.50 WI Milwaukee 13.00 17.50 18.20 18.65 19.15 19.15 18.44 20.05 15.10 15.10 15.10 14.50 14.50 Racine 11.50 16.00 16.70 17.15 17.50 17.50 16.79 18.40 15.10 15.10 15.10 14.50 14.50 115 Appendix 4 Local Rates: 1983 - 1995 Connection of a Rotary Residential
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror00.pdf
  • 0 18GTE Hawaiian Telephone Co. Inc. (Hawaii - GTHI) 118,998 79,438 39,560 224,529 17.62 (2,087) 0 19GTE Midwest Inc. (COIA + COSI = COIT) 30,229 19,953 10,276 30,087 34.16 11 0 20GTE Midwest Inc. (Iowa - GTIA) 22,281 15,663 6,618 29,140 22.71 (135) 0 21GTE Midwest Inc. (Missouri - COMO + COCM + COEM = COMT) 61,765 45,011 16,754 109,592 15.29 (24) 0 22GTE Midwest Inc. (Missouri - GTMO) 21,944 17,472 4,471 37,841 11.82 (106) 0 23GTE Midwest Inc. (Nebraska - GTNE) 10,255 6,282 3,973 11,352 35.00 (22) 0 24GTE North Inc. (COPA + COQS = COPT) 19,321 11,116 8,205 20,729 39.58 15 0 25GTE North Inc. (Illinois - COIL) 33,291 20,353 12,938 31,535 41.03 (215) 0 26GTE North Inc. (Indiana
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror02.pdf
  • 9.53 6.62 9.94 20.56 23.76 34 GTE Southwest Inc. (Texas - COTX) 12.12 11.90 12.17 17.13 14.96 18.10 35 GTE Southwest Inc. (Texas - GTTX) 20.56 24.35 21.65 21.42 16.43 14.81 36 Micronesian Telecomms. Corp. (N. Mariana Islands - GTMC) 32.75 21.83 23.58 29.24 34.45 21.17 GTE Midwest Inc. (Missouri - COMO + COCM + COEM = COMT) 20.33 17.06 15.29 12.56 12.39 GTE Midwest Inc. (Missouri - GTMO) 23.92 19.15 11.82 16.08 17.88 GTE Systems of The South (Alabama - COAL) 15.77 14.93 10.88 7.97 15.31 (Final Reports for 1997 Through 2001 and Initial Report for 2002) 1 Interstate Rate of Return Summary * Years 1997 through 2002 Price-Cap Companies Reporting FCC Form 492A 2002 Prepared by Katie Rangos, Industry
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror03.pdf
  • dba Verizon Southwest (Texas - COTX) 10.01 12.46 11.9 12.17 17.13 14.96 18.10 35 GTE Southwest Inc. dba Verizon Southwest (Texas - GTTX) 18.70 20.47 24.35 21.65 21.42 16.43 14.81 36 Micronesian Telecomms. Corp. (N. Mariana Islands - GTMC) 33.91 32.75 21.83 23.58 29.24 34.45 21.17 GTE Midwest Inc. (Missouri - COMO + COCM + COEM = COMT) 20.33 17.06 15.29 12.56 12.39 GTE Midwest Inc. (Missouri - GTMO) 23.92 19.15 11.82 16.08 17.88 GTE Systems of The South (Alabama - COAL) 15.77 14.93 10.88 7.97 15.31 (Final Reports for 1997 Through 2002 and Initial Report for 2003) 1 Interstate Rate of Return Summary * Years 1997 through 2003 Price-Cap Companies Reporting FCC Form 492A 2002 2003 Reporting Entity 2001 2000
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
  • COMPANY OF VIRGINIA 12.71 11.77 23.65 13.63 13.48 12.80 17CENTRAL TELEPHONE COMPANY - MINNESOTA 12.17 8.87 4.35 17.58 6.68 19.59 18CENTRAL TELEPHONE COMPANY - NEVADA 11.97 10.67 (0.57) 15.06 31,772.97 12.49 15.39 19CENTRAL TELEPHONE COMPANY - NORTH CAROLINA 11.26 10.67 6.26 16.89 23.66 5.32 13.57 20CONTEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC. 13.49 11.91 14.28 8.84 (264.96) 30.81 16.37 21CONTEL OF ILLINOIS, INC. 15.29 11.91 23.98 9.83 40.02 18.77 22CONTEL OF NEW YORK 11.81 11.91 5.64 16.65 9.49 12.66 23CONTEL OF PENNSYLVANIA 11.81 11.91 9.39 10.85 17.85 11.85 24CONTEL OF TEXAS, INC. 12.94 11.91 16.34 6.40 48.51 16.15 25CONTEL OF THE NORTHWEST 16.96 11.91 10.30 19.42 39.61 26.00 26CONTEL OF THE WEST 13.66 11.91 12.90 12.28 24.58 16.83 27CONTEL CENTRAL NORTH RATE GROUP 13.61
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror98.pdf
  • 11.91 17.54 16.83 47.80 21.34 27LUFKIN-CONROE TELEPHONE EXCHANGE 13.84 11.59 13.25 15.85 33.19 26.01 28PUERTO RICO TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.95 11.96 17.75 12.51 (205.36) 11.36 11.12 29ROCK HILL TELEPHONE COMPANY 13.04 11.92 13.66 17 10 15.31 30ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.97 11.45 8.28 9 8 7.97 31TELEPHONE UTILITIES EXCHANGE CARRIER ASSOC 12.39 11.08 17.90 13.73 32UTELCO, INC. 11.50 33VIRGIN ISLANDS TELEPHONE CORPORATION 15.29 11.59 2.34 31.36 (138.98) 50.22 42.47 34WARWICK VALLEY TELEPHONE COMPANY 12.58 11.10 12.07 12.52 22.97 13.22 35WINTERHAVEN TELEPHONE COMPANY 27.21 -10.99 35.43 35.43 MAXIMUM RATE OF RETURN 27.21% 18.00% 29.69% 43.04% 50.86% 71.14% 53.59% MINIMUM RATE OF RETURN 8.06 11.08 (10.99) 1.60 (276.47) 5.54 7.54 ARITHMETIC MEAN RATE OF RETURN 13.95 11.97 15.37 17.57 (142.49) 22.28 19.33 STANDARD DEVIATION OF
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror99.pdf
  • 12.06 9.24 9.68 9.31 15WESTERN RESERVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.01 11.50 7.80 10.42 12.60 11.67 16ANCHORAGE TELEPH0NE UTILITY 10.01 14.05 9.94 0.67 (191.15) 22.99 5.59 17C-R TELEPHONE COMPANY 1/ 5.41 12.96 (32.62) (9.26) 21.96 (9.40) 18CENTURYTEL OF MIDWEST-MICHIGAN, INC. 16.88 11.25 33.76 33.55 CENTURYTEL OF MI., INC. 19CENTURYTEL OF OHIO, INC. 19.56 14.61 17.48 24.46 20CENTURYTEL OF WISCONSIN, INC. 18.70 11.25 15.29 31.87 21CHILLICOTHE TELEPHONE COMPANY, THE 15.92 11.25 19.90 52.18 14.22 37.91 22CONCORD TELEPHONE CO. 14.36 12.60 27.21 15.30 (475.00) 20.10 15.56 23EL PASO TELEPHONE CO. 1/ 3.63 12.96 303.17 (5.36) (147.59) (9.24) 24FARMERS TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE, INC. 1/ 14.06 12.68 10.39 16.01 20.39 18.52 25FORT MILL TELEPHONE COMPANY 18.44 12.64 45.86 43.61 44.97 43.95 26HOME TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. 13.63 12.62 36.48
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
  • - COAZ) 13.19 10.90 15.57 13.80 14.17 12 GTE California, Inc. (Nevada - CONV) 26.57 28.82 20.57 24.01 31.44 13 GTE Florida Inc. (Florida - GTFL) 29.50 21.90 18.93 14.58 19.14 14 GTE Hawaiian Telephone Co. Inc. (Hawaii - GTHI) 17.02 17.87 17.62 15.64 10.55 15 GTE Midwest Inc. (Missouri - COMO + COCM + COEM = COMT) 20.79 17.06 15.29 12.56 12.39 16 GTE Midwest Inc. (Missouri - GTMO) 24.14 19.15 11.82 16.08 17.88 17 GTE North Inc. (COPA + COQS = COPT) 40.77 41.05 39.58 45.97 36.83 18 GTE North Inc. (Illinois - COIL) 54.92 44.51 41.03 14.11 41.14 19 GTE North Inc. (Indiana - COIN) 46.65 47.67 41.40 34.61 33.26 20 GTE North Inc. (Ohio - GTOH) 21.39
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • dba Verizon Southwest (Texas - COTX) 10.01 12.46 11.9 12.17 17.13 14.96 18.10 35 GTE Southwest Inc. dba Verizon Southwest (Texas - GTTX) 18.70 20.47 24.35 21.65 21.42 16.43 14.81 36 Micronesian Telecomms. Corp. (N. Mariana Islands - GTMC) 33.91 32.75 21.83 23.58 29.24 34.45 21.17 GTE Midwest Inc. (Missouri - COMO + COCM + COEM = COMT) 20.33 17.06 15.29 12.56 12.39 GTE Midwest Inc. (Missouri - GTMO) 23.92 19.15 11.82 16.08 17.88 GTE Systems of The South (Alabama - COAL) 15.77 14.93 10.88 7.97 15.31 (Final Reports for 1998 Through 2002 and Initial Report for 2003) 1 4 - 3 Table 4.1 Interstate Rate of Return Summary * Years 1998 through 2003 Price-Cap Companies Reporting FCC Form 492A 2002
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • dba Verizon Southwest (Texas - COTX) 10.01 12.46 11.9 12.17 17.13 14.96 18.10 35 GTE Southwest Inc. dba Verizon Southwest (Texas - GTTX) 18.70 20.47 24.35 21.65 21.42 16.43 14.81 36 Micronesian Telecomms. Corp. (N. Mariana Islands - GTMC) 33.91 32.75 21.83 23.58 29.24 34.45 21.17 GTE Midwest Inc. (Missouri - COMO + COCM + COEM = COMT) 20.33 17.06 15.29 12.56 12.39 GTE Midwest Inc. (Missouri - GTMO) 23.92 19.15 11.82 16.08 17.88 GTE Systems of The South (Alabama - COAL) 15.77 14.93 10.88 7.97 15.31 (Final Reports for 1997 Through 2002 and Initial Report for 2003) 1 4 - 3 Table 4.1 Interstate Rate of Return Summary * Years 1997 through 2003 Price-Cap Companies Reporting FCC Form 492A 2002
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
  • 15.09 13 GTE North Inc. (Illinois - COIL) 13/ 26.48 24.21 36.34 41.14 14.11 41.03 44.39 14 GTE North Inc. (Indiana - COIN) 13/ 22.44 23.27 29.02 33.26 34.61 41.40 47.71 GTE Midwest Inc. (COIA + COSI = COIT) 13/ 18.31 22.39 30.39 35.04 38.27 34.16 31/ 15 GTE Midwest Inc. (Missouri - COMO+COCM+COEM=COMT) 13/ 10.79 9.57 11.97 12.39 12.56 15.29 17.86 GTE Arkansas, Inc. (COAR+COSA=COAT) 13/ 17.44 18.24 19.13 16.13 15.87 16.81 14/ Contel of Minnesota - COMN 13/ 22.12 23.81 32.38 33.81 30.00 32.07 14/ GSTC - Central (Central Contel) 13/ 11.22 10.24 16.28 16 GTE North Inc. (COPA+COQS=COPT) 15/ 12.79 17.11 22.33 32.60 36.38 40.55 36.83 45.97 39.58 40.98 GTE Alaska, Inc. (Alaska - GTAK) 14.69 14.84 16.13
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • 9.53 6.62 9.94 20.56 23.76 34 GTE Southwest Inc. (Texas - COTX) 12.12 11.90 12.17 17.13 14.96 18.10 35 GTE Southwest Inc. (Texas - GTTX) 20.56 24.35 21.65 21.42 16.43 14.81 36 Micronesian Telecomms. Corp. (N. Mariana Islands - GTMC) 32.75 21.83 23.58 29.24 34.45 21.17 GTE Midwest Inc. (Missouri - COMO + COCM + COEM = COMT) 20.33 17.06 15.29 12.56 12.39 GTE Midwest Inc. (Missouri - GTMO) 23.92 19.15 11.82 16.08 17.88 GTE Systems of The South (Alabama - COAL) 15.77 14.93 10.88 7.97 15.31 (Final Reports for 1997 Through 2001 and Initial Report for 2002) 1 4 - 3 Table 4.1 Interstate Rate of Return Summary * Years 1997 through 2002 Price-Cap Companies Reporting FCC Form 492A 2002
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • -3.10 12.37 55.82 351316 C UNITED FARMERS TEL. CO. -2.33 0.80 -3.10 0.00 351319 A VAN BUREN TEL. CO., INC. 10.96 1.92 8.87 30.72 351320 A VAN HORNE COOP. TEL. CO. 12.36 0.32 12.00 57.75 351322 A VENTURA TEL. CO., INC. 12.85 0.81 11.95 57.98 351324 A VILLISCA FARMERS TEL. CO. 11.88 -0.23 12.13 59.56 351326 A WALNUT TEL. CO. 15.29 2.67 12.30 81.84 351327 C WEBB-DICKENS TEL. CORP. -1.40 -1.28 -0.12 0.00 351328 A WEBSTER-CALHOUN COOP. TEL. ASSN. 5.03 -0.24 5.29 8.32 351329 A WELLMAN COOP. TEL. ASSN. 14.13 0.80 13.23 439.24 351331 A WEST IOWA TEL. CO. 12.57 -0.16 12.75 83.77 351332 A WEST LIBERTY TEL. CO. 14.38 1.17 13.06 0.00 351334 A WESTERN IOWA TEL. ASSN. 9.85 1.06
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • INC. 10.26 -1.02 11.40 INFINITE 330944 A FRONTIER COMM.-ST. CROIX, INC. 7.26 1.15 6.04 0.00 330945 A SCANDINAVIA TEL. CO. 12.97 2.45 10.27 200.40 330946 A SHARON TEL. CO. 5.47 -4.05 9.92 31.94 330949 A SIREN TEL. CO., INC. 11.47 1.64 9.68 0.00 330950 C CENTURYTEL OF NORTHWEST WISCONSIN, INC. 1.06 2.25 -1.16 -4.44 330951 A SOMERSET TEL. CO., INC. 15.29 5.05 9.75 0.00 330952 C SOUTHEAST TEL. CO. OF WIS., INC. 2.93 0.06 2.87 -23.00 330953 C SPRING VALLEY TEL. CO., INC. 0.02 0.42 -0.40 -5.60 330954 C STOCKBRIDGE & SHERWOOD TEL. CO. 1.26 1.77 -0.50 -12.58 330955 A STATE LONG DISTANCE TEL. CO. 3.59 0.24 3.35 0.00 330956 C CENTURYTEL OF NORTHERN WISCONSIN, INC. -0.31 1.94 -2.21 -5.50 330958
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • CO. 5.79 3.75 1.97 6.30 351230 A NORTHEAST IOWA TEL. CO. 11.26 3.54 7.46 61.59 351232 A LYNNVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY 19.92 6.67 12.42 83.70 351235 A MANILLA TEL. CO. 10.08 0.83 9.18 68.77 351237 A MARNE & ELK HORN TEL. CO. 18.03 5.45 11.92 80.84 351238 A MARTELLE COOP. TEL. ASSN. 17.64 4.17 12.94 82.52 351239 A MASSENA TEL. CO. 15.29 2.33 12.67 78.81 3 - 197 Table 3.28 High-Cost Loop Fund Percentage Changes from 1998 to 1999 by Study Area Unseparated Universal Study Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Service Fund Area NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* IOWA (CONT.) 351241 A MECHANICSVILLE TEL. CO. 6.32 3.33 2.90 21.90 351242 A
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • 5.04 Northern Mariana Is. 9,692 95,401 9.84 43,940 4.53 51,461 5.31 Ohio 1,836,554 46,183,574 25.15 37,485,305 20.41 8,698,269 4.74 Oklahoma 627,032 36,633,689 58.42 27,341,726 43.60 9,291,962 14.82 Oregon 545,033 11,504,640 21.11 7,754,864 14.23 3,749,776 6.88 Pennsylvania 1,816,716 80,918,564 44.54 55,276,576 30.43 25,641,988 14.11 Puerto Rico 613,019 67,205,918 109.63 37,723,470 61.54 29,482,448 48.09 Rhode Island 156,454 7,881,029 50.37 5,488,540 35.08 2,392,490 15.29 South Carolina 666,780 38,920,136 58.37 28,356,513 42.53 10,563,623 15.84 South Dakota 131,037 2,194,936 16.75 1,307,010 9.97 887,926 6.78 Tennessee 916,202 66,302,487 72.37 46,872,395 51.16 19,430,092 21.21 Texas 3,991,783 146,743,131 36.76 119,959,948 30.05 26,783,183 6.71 Utah 480,255 5,293,094 11.02 4,434,828 9.23 858,266 1.79 Vermont 104,559 1,712,000 16.37 997,705 9.54 714,295 6.83 Virgin Islands 20,866 2,347,516 112.50 1,980,827 94.93 366,689 17.57 Virginia
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Enforcement/Orders/2000/da000146.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Enforcement/Orders/2000/da000146.txt
  • issue a monetary forfeiture in the amount of $20,000 against William Flippo, for willfully violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``the Act''), 47 U.S.C. ( 301, by operating an unlicensed radio station; violating Section 333 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. ( 333, by willfully and maliciously interfering with on-going amateur radio communications; and violating Section 15.29 of the Commission's Rules (``the Rules''), 47 C.F.R. ( 15.29, by willfully failing to make his radio equipment available for inspection by an authorized FCC representative on June 8, 1999. 2. On July 12, 1999, the Commission's Tampa, Florida District Office issued a $20,000 Notice of Apparent Liability (``NAL'') for a monetary forfeiture for the aforementioned violations. In response, on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/1997/dd970212.html
  • Communications Act of 1934, as amended and Section 2.803 of the Commission's rules; assessed a $10,000 forfeiture. Action by Chief, Compliance and Information Bureau. Adopted: February 6, 1997. by Order. (DA No. 97-313). CIB Internet URL: [11]http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Compliance/Orders/1997/da970313.txt BARRY A. STEVENSON. Denied Petition for Reconsideration filed by Barry A. Stevenson requesting review of a monetary forfeiture of $2,000 for violating Section 15.29 of the Commission's Rules by failing to allow inspection of a radio frequency device; reassessed $2,000 forfeiture. Action by Chief, Compliance and Information Bureau. Adopted: February 6, 1997. by Order. (DA No. 97-315). CIB Internet URL: [12]http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Compliance/Orders/1997/da970315.txt BEAR COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Denied the Petition for Reconsideration filed by Bear Communications, Inc., requesting a review of a $7,500 monetary forfeiture imposed on
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-291889A1.html
  • ) Mr. Larry Kaufman ) Citation No.: C200532940001 ) San Diego, California 92115 ) CITATION Released: March 11, 2005 By the District Director, San Diego Office, Western Region, Enforcement Bureau: 1. This is an Official Citation issued pursuant to Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''),1 to Mr. Larry Kaufman for violation of Section 15.5(b) and 15.29(a) of the Commission's rules (``Rules'').2 2. Investigation by the FCC's San Diego Office revealed that on February 28, 2005, a Part 15 device3 at the residence of Mr. Larry Kaufman in San Diego, California was causing interference to a neighbor's TV and FM radio reception and Mr. Kaufman refused to allow inspection of the offending device. 3. Section 15.5(b) of
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-321A1.html
  • regarding its distribution of the DM500-S and DM7020-S receivers. In its response dated November 5, 2006, One-O-One included a Declaration of Conformity test report for the DM500-S. One-O-One did not provide a test report for the DM7020-S receiver, and added that to the best of its knowledge, "there is no FCC certificate available for the DM7020-S." Sections 2.936, 2.1076 and 15.29 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R.SS 2.936, 2.1076 and 15.29, require that documents and/or test samples demonstrating equipment compliance be provided to the Commission upon reasonable request. Neither DreamBox USA nor One-O-One has provided documentation or other proof indicating that the DM7020-S receiver complies with either the Declaration of Conformity or certification requirements for television interface devices as specified in Section
• http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2000/99-15035.html
  • Avenue.[7]^(7) In concluding that it otherwise had subject matter jurisdiction over Dunifer's defenses, aside from the standing issue, the district court relied on Dougan v. FCC, 21 F.3d 1488 (9^th Cir. 1994). In that case, the petitioner sought review in this court of a final monetary forfeiture order of the FCC holding that he had violated 301 and 17 C.F.R. 15.29 "by operating a radio station without a license and by refusing to permit FCC engineers to inspect [Dougan's] station. " Id. at 1489. In particular, Dougan challenged the FCC's jurisdiction over his broadcasts as well as the constitutionality of the FCC licensing regulations. See id. at 1489-90. We held that this court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the appeal, see