FCC Web Documents citing 15.32

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300946A7.pdf
  • 10,331 $39,886 3,137 569.67 52.83 McCurtain 33,992 13,216 $25,105 2,566 1852.26 18.35 McIntosh 19,965 8,085 $26,740 1,592 620.01 32.20 Major 7,364 3,046 $35,013 915 956.76 7.70 Marshall 14,461 5,371 $28,354 1,191 371.11 38.97 Mayes 39,471 14,823 $32,124 3,008 656.14 60.16 Murray 12,880 5,003 $31,111 1,003 418.25 30.79 Muskogee 70,607 26,458 $30,598 5,317 813.85 86.76 Noble 11,211 4,504 $34,805 908 731.9 15.32 Nowata 10,864 4,147 $31,160 846 564.95 19.23 Okfuskee 11,434 4,270 $25,152 894 624.76 18.30 Oklahoma 684,543 266,834 $37,341 62,369 709.09 965.38 E9-1-1 ASSESSMENT AND STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA © 2007 Intrado Inc. All rights reserved. Page 114 County Resident total population Households Median household income Total number of firms Land area in square miles Population per square
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-510A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-510A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-510A1.txt
  • at 21,765. Using TCP's lower MVDP subscriber numbers and most recent estimate of households in each franchise, the percentage of penetration of subscribers to MVPDs other than to TCP, the largest, are: Franchise Area Subs H-holds Percent Franchise Area Subs H-holds Percent City of Alvin 2,070 7,843 26.39 City of Santa Fe 851 3,837 22.18 City of Dickinson 1,034 6,751 15.32 City of El Lago 273 1,407 19.41 City of Friendswood 3,798 10,537 36.04 Taylor Lake Village 226 1,384 16.33 League City 851 16,645 15.58 Village of Webster 1,035 2967 34.88 We recognize that in certain instances the aggregate MVPD penetrations, other than the largest provider, is extremely close to the 15% threshold under the second prong of the competiting provider
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.txt
  • approval before marketing new personal computer products and thus allow such products to reach the marketplace more quickly. These rules all align the FCC's equipment authorization requirements for personal computers with those used in other parts of the world. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 154, 302, 303, 304, 307. Section Number and Title: 15.3(bb) Definition of CPU Board. 15.19(b) Labelling requirements. 15.32 Test procedures for CPU boards and computer power supplies. 15.37(g) Transition provisions for compliance with the rules. SUBPART B-UNINTENTIONAL RADIATORS Brief Description: These rules specify the testing and labeling requirements for the ``Declaration of Conformity'' (DoC) procedure which permits these devices to be authorized based on a manufacturer's or supplier's declaration that the computer product conforms with all FCC requirements.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-948A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-948A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-948A1.txt
  • 0.283 of the Commission's rules. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Steven A. Broeckaert Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau ATTACHMENT A CSR 7707-E COMMUNITIES SERVED BY TIME WARNER CABLE INC. Communities CUIDs CPR* 2000 Census Households Estimated DBS Subscribers Adams Township OH2233 33.62 692 232.64 Amberley Village OH0725 15.17 1338 202.94 Anderson Township OH0764 17.44 15629 2726.31 Blue Ash City OH0708 15.32 4990 764.44 Carlisle Village OH0837 18.16 1849 335.7 Cheviot City OH0738 16.86 4064 684.99 Columbia Township OH0705 15.62 2655 414.69 Crosby Township OH1050 31.61 1025 323.96 Elmwood Place Village OH0709 16.89 9224 179.18 Evendale Village OH0790 16.02 1062 170.17 Fairfield City (Butler County) OH0250 22.32 16960 3785.35 Forest Park City OH0713 24.41 7505 1832.17 Franklin City OH0252 18.16 4553 826.64
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • 452179 C GILA RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 6.63 -0.24 6.89 8.32 452191 C ACCIPITER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 8.09 20.79 -10.51 6.95 452200 C FORT MOJAVE TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 9.38 3.91 5.27 10.35 452226 C MIDVALE TELEPHONE EXCHANGE, INC.-ARIZONA 81.10 38.41 30.85 105.80 452302 C VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC. - AZ -1.55 0.28 -1.82 -20.09 453334 C TABLE TOP TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -5.38 0.00 -5.38 -15.32 454426 C CITIZENS TEL CO-WHITE MT DBA FRONTIER COMM -13.63 -0.59 -13.12 -35.64 454449 C NAVAJO COMM CO INC DBA FRONTIER NAVAJO COM - AZ -10.26 -4.49 -6.04 -23.54 455101 C QWEST CORPORATION - AZ 1.35 -6.74 8.67 878.65 457991 C SADDLEBACK COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY -5.03 25.20 -24.15 -9.75 457991A C SADDLEBACK COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY 7.92 0.00 7.92 INFINITE ARKANSAS Total -3.29
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • 452179 C GILA RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 6.63 -0.24 6.89 8.32 452191 C ACCIPITER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 8.09 20.79 -10.51 6.95 452200 C FORT MOJAVE TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 9.38 3.91 5.27 10.35 452226 C MIDVALE TELEPHONE EXCHANGE, INC.-ARIZONA 81.10 38.41 30.85 105.80 452302 C VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC. - AZ -1.55 0.28 -1.82 -20.09 453334 C TABLE TOP TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -5.38 0.00 -5.38 -15.32 454426 C CITIZENS TEL CO-WHITE MT DBA FRONTIER COMM -13.63 -0.59 -13.12 -35.64 454449 C NAVAJO COMM CO INC DBA FRONTIER NAVAJO COM - AZ -10.26 -4.49 -6.04 -23.54 455101 C QWEST CORPORATION - AZ 1.35 -6.74 8.67 878.65 457991 C SADDLEBACK COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY -5.03 25.20 -24.15 -9.75 457991A C SADDLEBACK COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY 7.92 0.00 7.92 INFINITE ARKANSAS Total -3.29
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • C ARAPAHOE TELEPHONE COMPANY 16.16 -2.77 19.46 35.08 371517 C ARLINGTON TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.09 -3.04 14.57 31.22 371518 C ELSIE COMMUNICATIONS, INC. -12.56 -3.46 -9.42 -14.68 371524 C BLAIR TELEPHONE COMPANY 4.74 -8.59 14.59 68.21 371525 C THREE RIVER TELCO 1.26 -1.29 2.58 0.45 371526 C CAMBRIDGE TELEPHONE COMPANY - NE 3.78 -0.53 4.33 6.85 371530 A CONSOLIDATED TELCO, INC. 15.32 -2.60 18.39 48.36 371531 C CLARKS TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO. -4.18 -3.44 -0.77 -9.77 371532 A CONSOLIDATED TELEPHONE COMPANY- NE 18.98 -1.84 21.21 51.28 371534 C COZAD TELEPHONE COMPANY 15.27 -4.70 20.95 37.19 371536 C CURTIS TELEPHONE COMPANY 10.62 -4.33 15.63 15.99 371537 C DALTON TEL. CO.,INC. -15.62 -4.53 -11.62 -19.72 371540 C DILLER TELEPHONE COMPANY 33.05 -3.61 38.02 74.88 371542 C
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • C ARAPAHOE TELEPHONE COMPANY 16.16 -2.77 19.46 35.08 371517 C ARLINGTON TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.09 -3.04 14.57 31.22 371518 C ELSIE COMMUNICATIONS, INC. -12.56 -3.46 -9.42 -14.68 371524 C BLAIR TELEPHONE COMPANY 4.74 -8.59 14.59 68.21 371525 C THREE RIVER TELCO 1.26 -1.29 2.58 0.45 371526 C CAMBRIDGE TELEPHONE COMPANY - NE 3.78 -0.53 4.33 6.85 371530 A CONSOLIDATED TELCO, INC. 15.32 -2.60 18.39 48.36 371531 C CLARKS TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO. -4.18 -3.44 -0.77 -9.77 371532 A CONSOLIDATED TELEPHONE COMPANY- NE 18.98 -1.84 21.21 51.28 371534 C COZAD TELEPHONE COMPANY 15.27 -4.70 20.95 37.19 371536 C CURTIS TELEPHONE COMPANY 10.62 -4.33 15.63 15.99 371537 C DALTON TEL. CO.,INC. -15.62 -4.53 -11.62 -19.72 371540 C DILLER TELEPHONE COMPANY 33.05 -3.61 38.02 74.88 371542 C
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • 1.94 -2.59 -99.05 552353 C MOAPA VALLEY TELEPHONE COMPANY -2.74 -3.26 0.54 0.00 552356 C RIO VIRGIN TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.63 -0.84 8.54 0.00 553304 C HUMBOLDT TELEPHONE COMPANY -1.79 1.31 -3.07 -4.06 554431 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF NV DBA FRONTIER COMM OF NV -0.28 -2.30 2.07 -100.00 554432 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF NV DBA FRONTIER COMM OF NV 15.32 -5.36 21.85 0.00 555173 C NEVADA BELL 3.76 -8.56 13.46 0.00 NEW HAMPSHIRE TOTAL -3.19 -8.22 5.48 6.65 120038 C BRETTON WOODS TEL. CO. -10.41 5.93 -15.42 0.00 120039 C GRANITE STATE TEL., INC. 2.82 -3.50 6.55 22.78 120042 A DIXVILLE TEL. CO. -10.50 -2.08 -8.60 -45.16 120043 A DUNBARTON TEL. CO. 6.46 -0.29 6.77 46.39 120045 C KEARSARGE TEL.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • 1.94 -2.59 -99.05 552353 C MOAPA VALLEY TELEPHONE COMPANY -2.74 -3.26 0.54 0.00 552356 C RIO VIRGIN TELEPHONE COMPANY 7.63 -0.84 8.54 0.00 553304 C HUMBOLDT TELEPHONE COMPANY -1.79 1.31 -3.07 -4.06 554431 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF NV DBA FRONTIER COMM OF NV -0.28 -2.30 2.07 -100.00 554432 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF NV DBA FRONTIER COMM OF NV 15.32 -5.36 21.85 0.00 555173 C NEVADA BELL 3.76 -8.56 13.46 0.00 NEW HAMPSHIRE TOTAL -3.19 -8.22 5.48 6.65 120038 C BRETTON WOODS TEL. CO. -10.41 5.93 -15.42 0.00 120039 C GRANITE STATE TEL., INC. 2.82 -3.50 6.55 22.78 120042 A DIXVILLE TEL. CO. -10.50 -2.08 -8.60 -45.16 120043 A DUNBARTON TEL. CO. 6.46 -0.29 6.77 46.39 120045 C KEARSARGE TEL.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A6.txt
  • Mexico 328,220 38,795,377 118.20 29,476,877 89.81 9,318,500 28.39 New York 2,809,649 307,329,817 109.38 195,408,002 69.55 111,921,815 39.83 North Carolina 1,444,481 65,537,092 45.37 52,869,377 36.60 12,667,716 8.77 North Dakota 96,670 4,153,024 42.96 3,867,081 40.00 285,943 2.96 Northern Mariana Is. 11,695 1,041,729 89.07 951,734 81.38 89,995 7.70 Ohio 1,836,722 85,079,155 46.32 63,214,134 34.42 21,865,021 11.90 Oklahoma 639,391 48,574,821 75.97 38,781,522 60.65 9,793,299 15.32 Oregon 562,574 14,632,473 26.01 11,132,024 19.79 3,500,449 6.22 Pennsylvania 1,871,060 62,419,671 33.36 51,321,520 27.43 11,098,151 5.93 Puerto Rico 544,138 9,115,589 16.75 3,285,127 6.04 5,830,462 10.72 Rhode Island 151,612 5,902,392 38.93 5,116,179 33.75 786,213 5.19 South Carolina 708,021 37,011,415 52.27 30,425,473 42.97 6,585,942 9.30 South Dakota 121,158 6,553,628 54.09 4,747,482 39.18 1,806,145 14.91 Tennessee 978,368 47,182,147 48.23 39,114,227 39.98 8,067,920 8.25
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300946A7.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300946A7.txt
  • 10,331 $39,886 3,137 569.67 52.83 McCurtain 33,992 13,216 $25,105 2,566 1852.26 18.35 McIntosh 19,965 8,085 $26,740 1,592 620.01 32.20 Major 7,364 3,046 $35,013 915 956.76 7.70 Marshall 14,461 5,371 $28,354 1,191 371.11 38.97 Mayes 39,471 14,823 $32,124 3,008 656.14 60.16 Murray 12,880 5,003 $31,111 1,003 418.25 30.79 Muskogee 70,607 26,458 $30,598 5,317 813.85 86.76 Noble 11,211 4,504 $34,805 908 731.9 15.32 Nowata 10,864 4,147 $31,160 846 564.95 19.23 Okfuskee 11,434 4,270 $25,152 894 624.76 18.30 Oklahoma 684,543 266,834 $37,341 62,369 709.09 965.38 E9-1-1 ASSESSMENT AND STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA © 2007 Intrado Inc. All rights reserved. Page 114 County Resident total population Households Median household income Total number of firms Land area in square miles Population per square
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
  • C SPECTRA COMM. GROUP -6.31 -5.34 -1.03 0.00 421206 A>CIAMO TEL CO - MO -17.40 -6.08 -12.05 -64.54 421472 C FAIRPOINT MISSOURI -8.52 -6.22 -2.45 -26.63 421759 A CRAW-KAN TEL COOP-MO 16.81 -0.86 17.83 59.31 421807 C MOKAN DIAL INC-MO -7.22 -5.71 -1.60 -25.78 421860 C ALMA COMM. CO. -5.44 -1.45 -4.05 -8.99 421864 C CHARITON VALLEY TEL 10.58 -4.11 15.32 13.65 421865 C CITIZENS TEL CO - MO -6.08 -3.18 -2.99 -20.31 421866 C OZARK TEL. CO. 1.60 -6.34 8.48 1.87 421874 C ELLINGTON TEL CO -2.72 -3.77 1.09 -7.83 421876 A FARBER TEL CO 19.64 -3.80 24.37 73.20 421882 C FIDELITY TEL CO -3.94 -3.33 -0.63 -100.00 421885 C WINDSTREAM MO -4.20 -4.73 0.56 0.00 421886 C GOODMAN TEL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.txt
  • C SPECTRA COMM. GROUP -6.31 -5.34 -1.03 0.00 421206 A>CIAMO TEL CO - MO -17.40 -6.08 -12.05 -64.54 421472 C FAIRPOINT MISSOURI -8.52 -6.22 -2.45 -26.63 421759 A CRAW-KAN TEL COOP-MO 16.81 -0.86 17.83 59.31 421807 C MOKAN DIAL INC-MO -7.22 -5.71 -1.60 -25.78 421860 C ALMA COMM. CO. -5.44 -1.45 -4.05 -8.99 421864 C CHARITON VALLEY TEL 10.58 -4.11 15.32 13.65 421865 C CITIZENS TEL CO - MO -6.08 -3.18 -2.99 -20.31 421866 C OZARK TEL. CO. 1.60 -6.34 8.48 1.87 421874 C ELLINGTON TEL CO -2.72 -3.77 1.09 -7.83 421876 A FARBER TEL CO 19.64 -3.80 24.37 73.20 421882 C FIDELITY TEL CO -3.94 -3.33 -0.63 -100.00 421885 C WINDSTREAM MO -4.20 -4.73 0.56 0.00 421886 C GOODMAN TEL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.txt
  • 19.13 19.41 6.99 21.22 3,4,5 B.2.22.9.2.12W Analog Loop Non-Design/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (hours) 7.06 6.08 12.56 0.04 0.02 2,4,5 B - 39 Metric Metric Name [SQM Number] May June July August September Number and Disaggregation BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC Notes Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-331 Florida Performance Metric Data B.2.22.10.1.12W Analog Loop w/INP Design/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (hours) 15.32 17.25 21.00 1,3,4 B.2.22.11.1.12W Analog Loop w/INP Non- Design/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (hours) 17.82 17.90 22.08 22.94 1,2,4,5 B.2.22.11.1.42W Analog Loop w/INP Non- Design/<10 circuits/Dispatch In/FL (hours) 15.83 14.62 21.05 20.75 1,2,3,4 B.2.22.12.1.12W Analog Loop w/LNP Design/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (hours) 25.88 43.16 36.89 55.29 55.73 4,5 B.2.22.12.2.12W Analog Loop w/LNP Design/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (hours) 17.52 19.67 66.60 1,3,4 B.2.22.13.1.12W Analog Loop w/LNP Non- Design/<10
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Comments/fcc98055/209958-2.pdf
  • d0 PaN 30.00 10.00 0.00 -10.00 100 200 500 lk 2k 5k IOk 1. .-P Frequency(Hz) Figure8 Receive 714ll996 16117 Bruel & Kjaer ETS 5302 Ver. 2.52 SEND-Of& TlA47OB TOLR Ok 46+-6 4.2.1.2 & 4.2.1.3 FBl -6dBPa Noise <=15 Tone=Mid, Amp= Off, Vol = Min 1 kHz Level Sample "A" SLR P.79 QOOohm C:...\TlA470.007 45.64 dB P 17.00 dBCms F -15.32 dBV/Pa 10.07 dB 5.00 d0 VlPa -5.00 -25.00 -35.00 I 100 200 500 lk 2k 5k 10k I 1: F Figure 9 Transmit Frequency (Hz) Volume Control Evaluation 9of16 SAMPLE "B" Unamplified Receive and Transmit . Bmel 6 Kjaer ETS 53'32 VW. 2.52 RECEIVE 0 feet llA47OB ROLRO 46+-5 4.2.2 EL 4.2.2.3 Rl FBI -1OdBV Noise Cf40 Equalizw = OFF
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Comments/fcc98055/210007-2.pdf
  • 95.60 dB SPL -10.00 dBV 20.00 10.00 0.00 -10.00 100 200 500 lk 2k 5k 10k 1: ~P Frequency (Hz) Figure 6 Receive Bruel & Kjaer ETS 5302 Ver. 2 52 SEND - 0 feet TIA4708 TOLR Ok -48+-6 -45.64 dB P 4.2.1.2 & 4.2.1.3FBl -6dBPa Noise <=15 17.00 dBCms F Tone=Mid, Amp= Off, Vol = Min 1 kHz Level -15.32 dBV/Pa Sample "A" SLR P.79 9OOohm 10.07 dB 100 200 1: ~F 500 lk 2k Figure 9 Transmit 5k 10k Frequency (Hz) -31- SAMPLE "B" Unamplified Receive and Transmit Bruel6 KjaerETS5302Ver. 2.52 RECEIVE 0 feel TM4708 ROLRO 46+-s 4.2264.2.2.3RIFBl -1OdSV Noise <.40 Equalber = OFF SPL Level 0 IkHZ Sample "B' V Open Circuit 41.78 da 46.70 SPL(A) :, 97.30
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-b.pdf
  • 416-424. Wildman, Steven S. and Theomary Karamanis, "The Economics of Minority Programming." Paper presented at 1997 Aspen Institute Forum, "Delivering on Diversity: New Approaches to Marketing Minority Programming." November 1997. 35 Table 1a: Summary Statistics, 1997 All MarketsMarkets with Black Data Markets with Hispanic Data Formats 14.80 16.31 16.84 Stations Total 24.48 26.65 29.33 Youth-Targeted 5.56 6.48 5.53 Middle-Age-Targeted 14.12 15.32 17.96 Older-Targeted 4.80 4.85 5.84 White-Targeted 22.55 22.62 27.96 Black (non-white)-Targeted 1.92 4.03 1.37 Hispanic-Targeted 1.07 0.78 4.65 Non-Hispanic Targeted 23.41 25.87 24.69 AQH Listening (%) Total 15.77 15.98 16.36 White (Non-Black) 15.44 Black 17.88 Non-Hispanic 15.80 Hispanic 17.50 Population (millions) Total 0.70 1.16 1.62 White (Non-Black) 0.63 0.97 Black 0.08 0.19 Non-Hispanic 1.28 Hispanic 0.07 0.11 0.33 Fraction Black
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2002/fcc02331.pdf
  • 19.13 19.41 6.99 21.22 3,4,5 B.2.22.9.2.12W Analog Loop Non-Design/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (hours) 7.06 6.08 12.56 0.04 0.02 2,4,5 B - 39 Metric Metric Name [SQM Number] May June July August September Number and Disaggregation BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC Notes Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-331 Florida Performance Metric Data B.2.22.10.1.12W Analog Loop w/INP Design/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (hours) 15.32 17.25 21.00 1,3,4 B.2.22.11.1.12W Analog Loop w/INP Non- Design/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (hours) 17.82 17.90 22.08 22.94 1,2,4,5 B.2.22.11.1.42W Analog Loop w/INP Non- Design/<10 circuits/Dispatch In/FL (hours) 15.83 14.62 21.05 20.75 1,2,3,4 B.2.22.12.1.12W Analog Loop w/LNP Design/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (hours) 25.88 43.16 36.89 55.29 55.73 4,5 B.2.22.12.2.12W Analog Loop w/LNP Design/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (hours) 17.52 19.67 66.60 1,3,4 B.2.22.13.1.12W Analog Loop w/LNP Non- Design/<10
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • Sprint 22.28 14.68 0.12 32.30 4.00 Tennessee Memphis BellSouth 22.98 15.14 0.10 47.35 4.75 Tennessee Nashville BellSouth 22.17 14.74 0.10 45.03 4.75 Texas Brownsville SBC 17.36 12.46 0.08 44.06 3.95 Texas Corpus Christi SBC 19.59 14.54 0.08 43.91 3.95 Texas Dallas SBC 20.56 14.76 0.08 44.06 3.95 Texas Fort Worth SBC 18.53 13.07 0.08 44.06 3.95 Texas Houston SBC 21.45 15.32 0.08 44.06 3.95 Texas San Antonio SBC 19.56 14.12 0.08 43.91 3.95 Utah Logan Qwest 20.65 18.13 0.01 27.41 4.75 Virginia Richmond Verizon 30.93 24.09 0.10 38.50 1.25 Virginia Smithfield Verizon 29.09 20.40 0.16 40.00 2.50 Washington Everett Verizon 23.54 16.86 0.02 46.67 3.95 Washington Seattle Qwest 20.35 16.69 0.07 32.98 4.75 West Virginia Huntington Verizon 28.61 13.69 0.16 42.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 0.0900 38.92 1.95 Michigan Detroit Ameritech 19.76 16.42 0.0620 44.52 2.99 Michigan Grand Rapids Ameritech 18.25 15.88 0.0620 44.52 2.99 Michigan Saginaw Ameritech 20.11 17.76 0.0620 44.52 2.99 Minnesota Detroit Lakes US West 19.63 14.77 0.0900 19.54 2.99 Minnesota Minneapolis US West 21.46 15.95 0.0900 19.63 2.99 Mississippi Pascagoula BellSouth 25.26 17.11 0.0600 49.22 3.95 Missouri Kansas City SBC 19.53 15.32 0.0800 42.47 3.50 Missouri Mexico SBC 17.26 14.56 0.0800 41.88 3.50 Missouri St. Louis SBC 18.18 13.70 0.0800 43.06 3.50 Montana Butte US West 19.69 13.97 0.0500 25.00 2.99 Nebraska Grand Island US West 23.27 15.65 0.1030 22.94 2.74 New Jersey Phillipsburg Bell Atlantic 13.05 9.91 0.1000 44.89 1.25 New Mexico Alamogordo US West 20.99 13.23 0.1560 31.86 2.99 New
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
  • 105GTE MTO INC. - OHIO 12.98 12.45 23.45 10.50 (38.38) 16.78 11.99 106GTE MTO INC. - PENNSYLVANIA 11.74 12.46 12.57 9.52 (61.16) 13.62 10.61 107GTE MTO INC. - WISCONSIN 15.01 12.45 19.69 17.87 (23.71) 19.20 18.17 108HAWAIIAN TELEPHONE COMPANY 12.80 12.45 12.85 9.76 (19.71) 22.23 13.14 109ILLINOIS CONSOLIDATED TELEPHONE COMPANY 12.25 12.20 8.35 13.11 10.00 13.13 13.12 110INLAND TELEPHONE COMPANY 15.32 12.38 (6.98) 28.05 - 26.59 27.56 111KALONA COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY 16.63 12.38 15.85 22.99 - (3.45) 21.74 112KERMAN TELEPHONE COMPANY 12.66 12.38 11.52 10.18 - 37.49 13.39 113LAKESIDE TELEPHONE COMPANY 13.81 12.38 (1.86) 28.42 - (0.64) 17.46 114LEAF RIVER TELEPHONE COMPANY 2/ 8.19 12.52 - 22.13 (61.33) 41.21 (6.00) 115MATANUSKA TELEPHONE ASSOCIATION, INC. 10.36 12.38 5.31 3.89 - (15.95) 1.90
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • 77,937,745 10,552,963 0.22 VarTec Telecom, Inc. 21,066,638 223,342,923 58,825,194 1.21 Verizon Communications, Inc. (including PRTC) 59,517,063 358,004,419 104,690,266 2.15 Williams Communications, Inc. 299,804,550 1,559,282,230 169,019,071 3.47 Working Assets Funding Services, Inc. 3,452,557 32,098,073 12,955,723 0.27 WorldCom, Inc., d/b/a MCI 225,331,581 1,809,109,568 281,571,294 5.78 Z-Tel Communications, Inc. 2,846,106 17,877,537 6,837,728 0.14 Total for 20 Companies Requesting Confidential Treatment 741,694,986 4,852,397,349 746,053,631 15.32 Total for 574 Companies Not Shown Above 1/ 171,567,533 748,528,455 136,605,447 2.80 Total for all Reporting Carriers 4,830,721,249 27,381,650,037 $4,870,616,565 100.00% 1/ Data are consolidated for affiliated carriers. A total of 644 companies made a total of 706 filings. Source: Industry Analysis and Technology Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, 2002 International Telecommunications Data (March 2004). 6 - 7 7-1 7 Lines
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • COMPANY 15.18 3.07 11.75 60.15 361439 A MINNESOTA VALLEY TEL. CO. INC. 6.07 0.27 5.78 11.01 361440 A CANNON VALLEY TELECOM, INC. 11.49 0.30 11.15 46.69 361442 C NEW ULM TELECOM, INC. 11.61 -1.53 13.35 128.97 361443 A LORETEL SYSTEMS, INC. 14.22 0.91 13.19 334.65 361445 C CENTURYTEL OF MINNESOTA, INC. 3.32 0.50 2.81 1.79 361448 A OSAKIS TELEPHONE COMPANY 15.32 2.50 12.51 INFINITE 361450 A PARK REGION MUTUAL TEL. CO. 18.00 5.58 11.77 74.37 361451 C PAUL BUNYAN RURAL TEL. COOP. 37.52 4.91 31.08 134.05 361453 C PEOPLES TELEPHONE COMPANY - MN 2.49 2.54 -0.04 0.07 361454 C PINE ISLAND TELEPHONE COMPANY 13.27 1.76 11.31 48.81 361456 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO OF MINN 1.01 2.71 -1.65 0.00 361472 A REDWOOD
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • 30,296,851 39,603 35,105,541 126,556 41,290,360 36,870 42,264,337 6,034,170 41,089,777 10,227,851 Industry 1,717,069,582 535,5362,236,497,762 2,609,3452,603,937,395 16,766,9912,893,563,683 55,744,7443,156,402,360 123,751,2943,215,738,018 243,957,915 Table 3.14 Total High-Cost Support Payment Projections By State or Jurisdiction - ILECs and CLECs (Dollars) 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 3 - 27 Alabama $0.65 $0.01 $1.46 $0.26 $0.20 $0.73 $0.25 $3.56 Alaska 7.18 0.03 0.00 3.33 2.03 0.00 2.75 15.32 American Samoa 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.22 0.73 0.00 4.28 7.23 Arizona 0.91 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.17 0.52 0.33 2.03 Arkansas 2.73 0.01 0.00 0.81 1.34 0.34 0.46 5.70 California 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.02 0.12 0.02 0.34 Colorado 1.05 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.14 0.55 0.14 2.27 Connecticut 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.08 Delaware 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC- KS 10.12 1.62 8.36 100.39 411820 C RAINBOW TEL COOPERATIVE ASSN INC. 141.17 -3.78 150.63 INFINITE 411826 C RURAL TEL. SERVICE CO.,INC. 10.84 1.52 9.18 18.78 411827 C S & T TEL. COOP. ASSN. 2.63 4.04 -1.36 3.13 411829 C S & A TEL. CO.,INC. 14.81 1.79 12.79 22.02 411831 C SOUTH CENTRAL TEL. ASSN. INC.-KS 15.32 4.69 10.16 19.95 411833 C SOUTHERN KANSAS TEL. CO.,INC. 9.90 0.71 9.13 15.09 411835 C SUNFLOWER TEL. CO.,INC. -0.26 4.73 -4.76 -2.14 411839A>CTRI-COUNTY TEL. ASSN. INC.-KS 0.95 1.23 -0.28 13.13 411840 C TWIN VALLEY TEL. INC.-KS 16.36 -1.34 17.94 110.51 411841 C UNITED TELEPHONE ASSN. INC. 0.66 0.66 0.00 3.07 411842 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO OF KS -4.74 1.51 -6.16
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Comments/fcc98055/209958-2.pdf
  • d0 PaN 30.00 10.00 0.00 -10.00 100 200 500 lk 2k 5k IOk 1. .-P Frequency(Hz) Figure8 Receive 714ll996 16117 Bruel & Kjaer ETS 5302 Ver. 2.52 SEND-Of& TlA47OB TOLR Ok 46+-6 4.2.1.2 & 4.2.1.3 FBl -6dBPa Noise <=15 Tone=Mid, Amp= Off, Vol = Min 1 kHz Level Sample "A" SLR P.79 QOOohm C:...\TlA470.007 45.64 dB P 17.00 dBCms F -15.32 dBV/Pa 10.07 dB 5.00 d0 VlPa -5.00 -25.00 -35.00 I 100 200 500 lk 2k 5k 10k I 1: F Figure 9 Transmit Frequency (Hz) Volume Control Evaluation 9of16 SAMPLE "B" Unamplified Receive and Transmit . Bmel 6 Kjaer ETS 53'32 VW. 2.52 RECEIVE 0 feet llA47OB ROLRO 46+-5 4.2.2 EL 4.2.2.3 Rl FBI -1OdBV Noise Cf40 Equalizw = OFF
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Comments/fcc98055/210007-2.pdf
  • 95.60 dB SPL -10.00 dBV 20.00 10.00 0.00 -10.00 100 200 500 lk 2k 5k 10k 1: ~P Frequency (Hz) Figure 6 Receive Bruel & Kjaer ETS 5302 Ver. 2 52 SEND - 0 feet TIA4708 TOLR Ok -48+-6 -45.64 dB P 4.2.1.2 & 4.2.1.3FBl -6dBPa Noise <=15 17.00 dBCms F Tone=Mid, Amp= Off, Vol = Min 1 kHz Level -15.32 dBV/Pa Sample "A" SLR P.79 9OOohm 10.07 dB 100 200 1: ~F 500 lk 2k Figure 9 Transmit 5k 10k Frequency (Hz) -31- SAMPLE "B" Unamplified Receive and Transmit Bruel6 KjaerETS5302Ver. 2.52 RECEIVE 0 feel TM4708 ROLRO 46+-s 4.2264.2.2.3RIFBl -1OdSV Noise <.40 Equalber = OFF SPL Level 0 IkHZ Sample "B' V Open Circuit 41.78 da 46.70 SPL(A) :, 97.30
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/agree/files/mex-bc/am.pdf
  • u&m at L .km. d(b) Fc(d&l - 50% 100 179.11 150 117.18 200 92.06 250 77.54 300 68.82 \ 350 62.06 400 57.08 450 52.86 500 49.65 . 550 46.78 600 44.36 650 41.95 700 39.54 750 36.81 800 34.40 850 32.30 900 29.89 950 27.63 LOO0 25.54 1050 23% 1100 21.84 1150 19.91 1200 18.30 1250 16.70 _ 1300 15.32 1350 13.97 1400 L2.71 1450 11.55 1500 10 .so 1550 9.53 L600 8.57 1650 7.72 1700 6.98 1750 6.34 L800 5.30 1850 5.32 L900 4.49 1950 4.49 2000 4.L4 2100 3.61 2200 3.L8 2300 2.79 2400 2.55 2500 2.26 2600 2.03 2700 1.85 2800 1.69 2900 L.55 d (km) 3000 3100 3200 3300 3400 3500 3600 3700 3800 3900 4000
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-b.pdf
  • 416-424. Wildman, Steven S. and Theomary Karamanis, "The Economics of Minority Programming." Paper presented at 1997 Aspen Institute Forum, "Delivering on Diversity: New Approaches to Marketing Minority Programming." November 1997. 35 Table 1a: Summary Statistics, 1997 All MarketsMarkets with Black Data Markets with Hispanic Data Formats 14.80 16.31 16.84 Stations Total 24.48 26.65 29.33 Youth-Targeted 5.56 6.48 5.53 Middle-Age-Targeted 14.12 15.32 17.96 Older-Targeted 4.80 4.85 5.84 White-Targeted 22.55 22.62 27.96 Black (non-white)-Targeted 1.92 4.03 1.37 Hispanic-Targeted 1.07 0.78 4.65 Non-Hispanic Targeted 23.41 25.87 24.69 AQH Listening (%) Total 15.77 15.98 16.36 White (Non-Black) 15.44 Black 17.88 Non-Hispanic 15.80 Hispanic 17.50 Population (millions) Total 0.70 1.16 1.62 White (Non-Black) 0.63 0.97 Black 0.08 0.19 Non-Hispanic 1.28 Hispanic 0.07 0.11 0.33 Fraction Black