FCC Web Documents citing 20.19

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1867A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1867A1.pdf
  • 0001523125 Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: April 25, 2007 Released: April 25, 2007 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find IT&E Overseas, Inc. (``IT&E'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of sixteen thousand dollars ($16,000) for its willful and repeated violations of Section 20.19(f) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The apparent violations involve IT&E's failure to comply with the labeling requirements for digital wireless hearing aid-compatible handsets. Background In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission took a number of actions to further the ability of persons with hearing disabilities to access digital wireless telecommunications. Among other actions, the Commission required manufacturers and
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2118A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2118A1.pdf
  • File No. EB-07-SE-141 NAL/Acct. No. 200732100033 FRN # 0001699776 Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: May 21, 2007 Released: May 22, 2007 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Pine Telephone Company d/b/a Pine Cellular Phones, Inc. (``Pine'') apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(f) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to comply with the labeling requirements for digital wireless hearing aid-compatible handsets. For Pine's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of sixteen thousand dollars ($16,000). II. BACKGROUND In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission took a number of actions to further the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3524A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3524A1.pdf
  • Litchfield County Cellular, Inc. d/b/a Ramcell of Kentucky, and Litchfield County Cellular, Inc. d/b/a Ramcell of Oregon (``Ramcell Licensees''). The Consent Decree terminates the Bureau's investigations into the Ramcell Licensees' compliance with the Enhanced 911 requirements set forth in Section 20.18(g)(1)(i)-(v) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), and the hearing aid compatibility requirements for digital wireless handsets set forth in Section 20.19(c)(2) of the Rules. The Enforcement Bureau and the Ramcell Licensees have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve these matters and terminate the investigations. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. Based on the record before us, we conclude that no substantial or material questions of fact exist with respect to
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4339A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4339A1.pdf
  • File No. EB-07-SE-142 NAL/Acct. No. 200832100001 FRN # 0007435902 Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: October 18, 2007 Released: October 22, 2007 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that AST Telecom, LLC d/b/a Blue Sky Communications (``Blue Sky'') apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(f) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to comply with the labeling requirements for digital wireless hearing aid-compatible handsets. For Blue Sky's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of eight thousand dollars ($8,000). II. BACKGROUND In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission took a number of actions to further
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4481A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4481A1.pdf
  • ) File No. EB-07-SE-144 NAL/Acct. No. 200832100004 FRN # 0001607175 Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: October 31, 2007 Released: November 1, 2007 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that South Central Utah Telephone Association, Inc. (``South Central'') apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(f) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to comply with the labeling requirements for digital wireless hearing aid-compatible handsets. For South Central's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-four thousand dollars ($24,000). II. BACKGROUND In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission took a number of actions to further
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4745A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4745A1.pdf
  • 2007 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Memorandum Opinion and Order, we admonish XIT Telecommunications & Technology, Ltd. d/b/a XIT Cellular (``XIT'') for failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings two handset models that meet the hearing aid compatibility requirements for radio frequency interference by September 16, 2005 in violation of Section 20.19(c)(2)(i)(B)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). BACKGROUND In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission took a number of actions to further the ability of persons with hearing disabilities to access digital wireless telecommunications. Among other actions, the Commission required manufacturers and digital wireless service providers to collectively take steps to increase the number of hearing aid-compatible handset models available,
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1157A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1157A1.pdf
  • EB-07-SE-269 Acct. No. 200832100047 FRN No. 0001623321 Adopted: May 19, 2008 Released: May 21, 2008 By the Deputy Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Custer Telephone Cooperative, Inc. (``Custer''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Custer for possible violations of section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') regarding the inductive coupling hearing aid compatibility requirements. 2. The Bureau and Custer have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve these matters. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1186A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1186A1.pdf
  • ) File No. EB-07-SE-273 Acct. No. 200832100048 FRN No. 0004250056 Adopted: June 2, 2008 Released: June 10, 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Choice Wireless, LC (``Choice''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Choice for possible violation of section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') regarding the inductive coupling hearing aid compatibility requirements. The Bureau and Choice have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find that the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1291A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1291A1.pdf
  • 0001753771 Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: June 2, 2008 Released: June 4, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Farmers Cellular Telephone, Inc. (``Farmers Cellular''), a Global System for Mobile Communications (``GSM'') carrier serving rural Alabama, apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by September 18, 2006. For Farmers Cellular's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of thirty thousand dollars ($30,000). II. BACKGROUND In the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1314A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1314A1.pdf
  • forfeiture of sixty thousand dollars ($60,000) against SunCom Wireless, Inc. (``SunCom''), a Global System for Mobile Communications-based (``GSM-based'') Tier II carrier, serving most of North and South Carolina, parts of the bordering states of Virginia, Tennessee and Georgia (``mainland''), and Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. As detailed herein, we find that SunCom apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by the September 18, 2006 deadline. II. BACKGROUND In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of individuals with hearing disabilities to access
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1369A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1369A1.pdf
  • of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: June 9, 2008 Released: June 11, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Union Telephone Company (``Union''), a Global System for Mobile Communications-based (``GSM'') carrier serving rural Wyoming, Colorado, Utah, and Idaho, apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings, by September 18, 2006, at least two models that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility. For Union's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000). II. BACKGROUND In the 2003
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1398A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1398A1.pdf
  • FRN # 0002377901 Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: June 11, 2008 Released: June 13, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that PinPoint Wireless, Inc. (``PinPoint''), a Global System for Mobile Communications-based (``GSM'') carrier serving rural Nebraska, apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by September 18, 2006. For PinPoint's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of thirty thousand dollars ($30,000). II. BACKGROUND In the 2003
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1423A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1423A1.pdf
  • # 0003766201 Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: June 16, 2008 Released: June 18, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Blanca Telephone Company (``Blanca''), a Code Division Multiple Access-based (``CDMA-based'') Tier III carrier, serving rural Colorado, apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by the September 18, 2006 deadline. For Blanca's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000). II. BACKGROUND In
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1424A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1424A1.pdf
  • Centennial Communications Corp. ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-08-SE-117 NAL/Acct. No. 200832100055 FRN No. 0003296480 Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: June 17, 2008 Released: June 17, 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Centennial Communications Corp. (``Centennial'') apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models for the GSM air interface in its mainland wireless network that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by September 18, 2006. For Centennial's apparent violation, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-14A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-14A1.pdf
  • ) File No. EB-07-SE-282 NAL/Acct. No. 200832100009 FRN # 0004285698 Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: January 2, 2008 Released: January 3, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that South Canaan Cellular Communications Company, L.P. (``South Canaan'') apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by September 18, 2006. For South Canaan's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000). II. BACKGROUND In the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1625A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1625A1.pdf
  • No. 200832100056 FRN No. 0015360456 Adopted: July 11, 2008 Released: July 14, 2008 By the Deputy Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and NE Colorado Cellular, Inc., dba Viaero Wireless (``Viaero''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Viaero for possible violation of section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') regarding inductive coupling hearing aid compatibility handset requirements. The Bureau and Viaero have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find that the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1716A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1716A1.pdf
  • EB-08-SE-119 Acct. No. 200832100059 FRN No. 0002701688 Adopted: July 30, 2008 Released: August 1, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Airadigm Communications, Inc. (``Airadigm''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Airadigm for possible violations of section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') regarding the inductive coupling hearing aid compatibility requirements. The Bureau and Airadigm have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find that the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1719A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1719A1.pdf
  • 25, 2008 Released: July 28, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and IT&E Overseas, Inc. (``IT&E''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation and a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') by the Bureau against IT&E for possible violations of section 20.19(f) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') regarding IT&E's failure to comply with the labeling requirements for digital wireless hearing aid-compatible handsets, and an investigation by the Bureau against IT&E for possible violations of section 20.19(d)(2) of the Rules regarding IT&E's failure to offer at least two digital wireless handset models meeting the Commission's standards for inductive coupling by the compliance deadline.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1828A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1828A1.pdf
  • ) ) ) ) File No. EB-07-SE-327 NAL/Acct. No. 200832100064 FRN # 0003804101 Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: July 31, 2008 Released: July 31, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Corr Wireless Communications, LLC (``Corr'') apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by September 18, 2006. For Corr's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of thirty thousand dollars ($30,000). II. BACKGROUND In the 2003
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-182A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-182A1.pdf
  • File No. EB-07-SE-272 NAL/Acct. No. 200832100015 FRN # 0001634443 Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: February 8, 2008 Released: February 11, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Cable & Communications Corporation dba Mid-Rivers Cellular (``Mid-Rivers Cellular'') apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by September 18, 2006. For Mid-Rivers Cellular's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000). II. BACKGROUND In the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2451A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2451A1.pdf
  • of six thousand dollars ($6,000). We also admonish ASTCA for failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two handset models that meet the hearing aid compatibility requirements for radio frequency interference and two handset models that meet the hearing aid compatibility requirements for inductive coupling capability by the compliance deadlines in apparent violation of former Sections 20.19(c)(2)(i)(B)(1) and 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). II. BACKGROUND In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of individuals with hearing disabilities to access digital wireless telecommunications. The Commission established technical standards that digital wireless handsets must meet to be considered compatible with hearing aids operating in acoustic coupling and inductive coupling
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-463A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-463A1.pdf
  • File No. EB-07-SE-260 NAL/Acct. No. 200832100017 FRN # 0007435902 Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: February 26, 2008 Released: February 27, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that AST Telecom, LLC d/b/a Blue Sky Communications (``Blue Sky'') apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by September 18, 2006. For Blue Sky's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of fifteen thousand hundred dollars ($15,000). II. BACKGROUND In
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-535A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-535A1.pdf
  • EB-08-SE-109 NAL/Acct. No. 200832100020 FRN # 0005769302 Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: March 7, 2008 Released: March 11, 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that CTC Telecom, Inc. (``CTC''), a Code Division Multiple Access-based (``CDMA-based'') carrier serving rural Idaho, apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by September 18, 2006. For CTC's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of thirty thousand dollars ($30,000). II. BACKGROUND In the 2003
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-537A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-537A1.pdf
  • 200732100033 FRN No. 0001699776 Adopted: March 17, 2008 Released: March 19, 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Pine Telephone Company, Inc. d/b/a Pine Cellular Phones, Inc. (``Pine''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Pine for possible violations of section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') regarding the inductive coupling hearing aid compatibility requirements and an investigation and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture against Pine for possible violations of section 20.19(f) of the Rules regarding the hearing aid compatibility labeling requirements. The Bureau and Pine have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve these matters. A copy of
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-555A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-555A1.pdf
  • No. EB-07-SE-407 NAL/Acct. No. 200832100021 FRN # 0001650324 Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: March 12, 2008 Released: March 13, 2008 By the Deputy Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that SLO Cellular, Inc. d/b/a Cellular One of San Luis Obispo (``SLO Cellular'') apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Sections 20.19(c)(2)(i)(B)(1) and 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models that meet the radio frequency interference and inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by the applicable deadline. For SLO Cellular's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of forty-five thousand
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-603A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-603A1.pdf
  • March 19, 2008 Released: March 20, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that South Slope Cooperative Telephone Company, d/b/a South Slope Wireless (``South Slope''), a Global System for Mobile Communications (``GSM'') Tier III carrier serving parts of Iowa, apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by September 18, 2006. For South Slope's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000). II. BACKGROUND In the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-610A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-610A1.pdf
  • By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Iowa Wireless Services, LLC dba i wireless (``i wireless''), a Global System for Mobile Communications (``GSM'') carrier encompassing 37 associated Personal Communications Services (``PCS'') licensees providing service in Iowa and western Illinois, apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by September 18, 2006. For i wireless's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-two thousand five hundred dollars ($22,500). II. BACKGROUND
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-785A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-785A1.pdf
  • Released: April 7, 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Cable & Communications Corporation dba Mid-Rivers Cellular (``Mid-Rivers Cellular''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') by the Bureau against Mid-Rivers Cellular for possible violation of Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') regarding its failure to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by September 18, 2006. The Bureau and Mid-Rivers Cellular have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-914A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-914A1.pdf
  • No. EB-07-SE-270 Acct. No. 200832100046 FRN No. 0004119483 Adopted: May 7, 2008 Released: May 9, 2008 By the Deputy Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Edge Wireless Licenses, LLC (``Edge''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Edge for possible violations of section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") regarding the inductive coupling hearing aid compatibility requirements. The Bureau and Edge have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find that the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-920A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-920A1.pdf
  • EB-07-SE-271 Acct. No. 200832100041 FRN No. 0001766179 Adopted: April 21, 2008 Released: April 23, 2008 By the Deputy Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Alaska DigiTel, LLC (``Alaska DigiTel''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Alaska DigiTel for possible violation of section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') regarding the inductive coupling hearing aid compatibility requirements. The Bureau and Alaska DigiTel have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find that
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1025A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1025A1.pdf
  • No. 200932100055 FRN No. 0001704246 Adopted: May 11, 2009 Released: May 13, 2009 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Panhandle Telecommunication Systems, Inc. (``PTSI''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against PTSI for possible violation of former Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') regarding the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility. The Bureau and PTSI have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find that
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1044A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1044A1.pdf
  • and Order, 35 FCC 2d 361 (1972). See Eure, 17 FCC Rcd at 21863-64; Triad Broadcasting Company, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 96 FCC 2d 1235, 1244 (1984). See Corr Wireless Communications, LLC, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 22 FCC Rcd 11567, 11570 (Enf. Bur. Spectrum Enf. Div., 2008) (finding that Corr apparently willfully and repeatedly violated former Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Rules by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by September 18, 2006), response pending. Although Section 504(c) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 504(c), prohibits us from relying on the issuance of a prior NAL that has not been paid or
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1504A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1504A1.pdf
  • Adopted: July 8, 2009 Released: July 10, 2009 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and CT Cube, Inc. d/b/a West Central Wireless (``CT Cube''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against CT Cube for possible violations of former section 20.19(c)(2)(i)(B)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') regarding the offering of digital wireless handset models that meet the radio frequency interference standard for hearing aid compatibility, and former section 20.19(f) of the Rules regarding the labeling requirements for digital wireless hearing aid-compatible handsets. The Bureau and CT Cube have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2473A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2473A1.pdf
  • introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we propose a forfeiture of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000) against Smith Bagley, Inc., d/b/a Cellular One of NE Arizona (``SBI''), a Global System for Mobile Communications-based (``GSM-based'') Tier III carrier, serving parts of Arizona and New Mexico. As detailed herein, we find that SBI apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(c)(3) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), by failing to timely provide in its digital wireless handset offerings to consumers at least eight handset models that meet the radio frequency interference standards for hearing aid compatibility set forth in Section 20.19(b)(1), or in the alternative, ensure that at least 50% percent of the handset models that it offered to consumers complied with
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2507A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2507A1.pdf
  • No. 201032100007 FRN 0005899216 Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: November 30, 2009 Released: December 2, 2009 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Apple, Inc. (``Apple'') apparently willfully violated the wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in Section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). For this apparent violation, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of five thousand dollars ($5,000). II. BACKGROUND In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of individuals with hearing disabilities to access digital wireless telecommunications. The Commission established technical standards that digital wireless handsets must meet
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-435A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-435A1.pdf
  • February 24, 2009 Released: February 26, 2009 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Long Lines Wireless, LLC d/b/a Long Lines Wireless (``Long Lines''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation of Long Lines by the Bureau for possible violations of former Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') regarding the inductive coupling hearing aid compatibility requirements. The Bureau and Long Lines have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find that
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-556A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-556A1.pdf
  • 9, 2009 Released: March 13, 2009 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and PinPoint Wireless, Inc. (``PinPoint''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') by the Bureau against PinPoint for possible violations of former Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') regarding the inductive coupling hearing aid compatibility requirements. The Bureau and PinPoint have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find that the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1271A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1271A1.pdf
  • Acct. No. 201032100035 FRN No. 0016162539 Adopted: July 9, 2010 Released: July 12, 2010 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Futurewei Technologies, Inc. d/b/a Huawei Technologies (USA) (``Huawei''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Huawei for possible violations of Section 20.19(i) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), regarding compliance with the Commission's regulations pertaining to hearing aid compatibility for wireless handsets. The Bureau and Huawei have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1321A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1321A1.pdf
  • Date, and twenty-four (24) months after the Effective Date. Each Compliance Report shall include a certification by the Compliance Officer, as an agent of and on behalf of Qomo, stating that the Compliance Officer has personal knowledge that Qomo (i) has established operating procedures intended to ensure compliance with the terms and conditions of this Consent Decree and with section 20.19 of the Rules, together with an accompanying statement explaining the basis for the Compliance Officer's certification; (ii) has been utilizing those procedures since the previous Compliance Report was submitted; and (iii) is not aware of any instances of non-compliance. The certification must comply with section 1.16 of the Rules and be subscribed to as true under penalty of perjury in
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1654A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1654A1.pdf
  • the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we propose a forfeiture of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000) against Oklahoma Independent RSA 5 Partnership (``Oklahoma Independent''), a Global System for Mobile Communications-based (``GSM-based'') Tier III carrier, serving parts of Oklahoma. As detailed herein, we find that Oklahoma Independent apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(c)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''), by failing to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of digital wireless handsets that met or exceeded the radio frequency interference standards for hearing aid compatibility set forth in Section 20.19(b)(1). II. BACKGROUND In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of consumers with hearing
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1657A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1657A1.pdf
  • By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we propose a forfeiture of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000) against TX-10 Licensee, LLC dba Cellular One (``TX-10''), a Global System for Mobile Communications-based (``GSM-based'') Tier III carrier, serving parts of Texas. As detailed herein, we find that TX-10 apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(c)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''), by failing to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of digital wireless handsets that met or exceeded the radio frequency interference standards for hearing aid compatibility set forth in Section 20.19(b)(1). II. BACKGROUND In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of consumers with hearing
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1659A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1659A1.pdf
  • By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we propose a forfeiture of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000) against OK-5 Licensee Co., LLC (``OK-5 Licensee''), a Global System for Mobile Communications-based (``GSM-based'') Tier III carrier, serving parts of Oklahoma. As detailed herein, we find that OK-5 Licensee apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(c)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''), by failing to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of digital wireless handsets that met or exceeded the radio frequency interference standards for hearing aid compatibility set forth in Section 20.19(b)(1). II. BACKGROUND In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of consumers with hearing
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2040A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2040A1.pdf
  • liability for forfeiture Adopted: October 25, 2010 Released: October 26, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Total Call Mobile, Inc. (``TCM''), a reseller of mobile wireless services, apparently willfully violated the wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in Section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated the public web site posting requirements set forth in Section 20.19(h) of the Rules. For these apparent violations, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of twelve thousand dollars ($12,000). We also direct TCM to file the required wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report within thirty (30) days
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2041A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2041A1.pdf
  • for forfeiture Adopted: October 25, 2010 Released: October 26, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that IDT Telecom, Inc. (``IDT Telecom''), a reseller of digital wireless services, apparently willfully violated the wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in Section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated the public web site posting requirements set forth in Section 20.19(h) of the Rules. For these apparent violations, we propose a total forfeiture in the amount of twelve thousand dollars ($12,000). We also direct IDT Telecom to file the required wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report within thirty
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2046A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2046A1.pdf
  • 25, 2010 Released: October 26, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that MGA Entertainment, Inc. (``MGA''), a reseller of wireless services through its Bratz Mobile phone offering, apparently willfully violated the wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in Section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). For this apparent violation, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of six thousand dollars ($6,000). We also direct MGA to file the required wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report within thirty (30) days of the release of this NAL. II. BACKGROUND In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2049A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2049A1.pdf
  • Adopted: October 26, 2010 Released: October 26, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Cbeyond Communications, LLC (``Cbeyond'') d/b/a Beyond Mobile, a reseller of mobile wireless services, apparently willfully violated the wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in Section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated the public web site posting requirements set forth in Section 20.19(h) of the Rules. For these apparent violations, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of twelve thousand dollars ($12,000). II. BACKGROUND In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2226A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2226A1.pdf
  • liability for forfeiture Adopted: November 22, 2010 Released: November 22, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Lightyear Network Solutions, LLC (``Lightyear''), a reseller of mobile wireless services, apparently willfully violated the wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in Section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated the public web site posting requirements set forth in Section 20.19(h) of the Rules. For these apparent violations, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of twelve thousand dollars ($12,000). We also direct Lightyear to file the required wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report within thirty (30) days
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2250A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2250A1.pdf
  • 2010 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we propose a forfeiture of forty-five thousand dollars ($45,000) against East Buchanan Telephone Cooperative (``East Buchanan''), a Global System for Mobile Communications-based (``GSM-based'') Tier III carrier serving parts of Iowa. As detailed herein, we find that East Buchanan apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 20.19(c)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''), by failing to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of digital wireless handsets that met or exceeded the radio frequency interference standards for hearing aid compatibility set forth in section 20.19(b)(1), and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Rules, by failing to offer to consumers the required number or percentage
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2378A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2378A1.pdf
  • File No. EB-10-SE-016 Acct. No. 201132100015 FRN No. 0019130319 Adopted: December 23, 2010 Released: December 27, 2010 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Maximum Communications Cellular, LLC ("MaxCell"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against MaxCell for possible violations of Section 20.19(c)(3)(ii) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") regarding the commercial availability of digital wireless handset models meeting the radio frequency standard for hearing aid compatibility, and for possible violations of Section 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Rules regarding the commercial availability of digital wireless handset models meeting the inductive coupling standard for hearing aid compatibility. The Bureau and MaxCell have negotiated the terms of
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2428A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2428A1.pdf
  • December 30, 2010 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we propose a forfeiture of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000) against Sandhill Communications (``Sandhill''), a Global System for Mobile Communications-based (``GSM-based'') Tier III carrier, serving parts of South Carolina. As detailed herein, we find that Sandhill apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 20.19(c)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''), by failing to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of digital wireless handsets that met or exceeded the radio frequency interference standards for hearing aid compatibility set forth in section 20.19(b)(1) of the Rules. BACKGROUND In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of consumers
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2435A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2435A1.pdf
  • Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that the Champaign Telephone Company d/b/a CT Communications, Inc., a reseller of mobile wireless services through its operating division, CT Wireless (collectively, ``CT Communications''), apparently willfully violated the wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). For this apparent violation, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of six thousand dollars ($6,000). We also direct CT Communications to file the required wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report within thirty (30) days after the release of this NAL. II. BACKGROUND 2. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2436A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2436A1.pdf
  • the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we propose a forfeiture of thirty-nine thousand dollars ($39,000) against Indigo Wireless, Inc. (``Indigo Wireless''), a Global System for Mobile Communications-based (``GSM-based'') Tier III carrier serving parts of New York and Pennsylvania. As detailed herein, we find that Indigo Wireless apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 20.19(c)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''), by failing to offer to consumers for nine months the required number or percentage of digital wireless handsets that met or exceeded the radio frequency interference standards for hearing aid compatibility set forth in section 20.19(b)(1) of the Rules. BACKGROUND In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2439A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2439A1.pdf
  • No. 201132100019 FRN 0016004731 Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: December 30, 2010 Released: December 30, 2010 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that STi Prepaid, LLC, a reseller of wireless services through its operating division, STi Mobile (collectively, ``STi Prepaid''), apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 20.19(e)(2) of the Commission's rules (``Rules'') by failing for 18 months to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least one handset model that meets the inductive coupling standard for hearing aid compatibility set forth in section 20.19(b)(2) of the Rules. Further, we find that STi Prepaid apparently willfully violated the hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2440A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2440A1.pdf
  • Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we propose a forfeiture of nineteen thousand five hundred dollars ($19,500) against Epic Touch Co., Inc. (``Epic Touch''), a Global System for Mobile Communications-based (``GSM-based'') Tier III carrier, serving parts of Kansas and Oklahoma. As detailed herein, we find that Epic Touch apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 20.19(c)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''), by failing to offer to consumers for nine months the required number or percentage of digital wireless handsets that met or exceeded the radio frequency interference standards for hearing aid compatibility set forth in section 20.19(b)(1) of the Rules. II. BACKGROUND In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-77A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-77A1.pdf
  • Liability for forfeiture Adopted: January 14, 2010 Released: January 14, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that ACS Wireless, Inc. (``ACSW''), a subsidiary of Alaska Communications Systems, apparently willfully violated the wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in Section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated the public web site posting requirements set forth in Section 20.19(h) of the Rules. For these apparent violations, we propose a total forfeiture in the amount of twelve thousand dollars ($12,000). II. BACKGROUND In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-78A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-78A1.pdf
  • FRN 0018191189 Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: January 14, 2010 Released: January 14, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Doro AB (``Doro'') apparently willfully and repeatedly violated the wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in Section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). For this apparent violation, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of twelve thousand dollars ($12,000). II. BACKGROUND In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of individuals with hearing disabilities to access digital wireless telecommunications. The Commission established technical standards that digital wireless handsets must meet
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-79A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-79A1.pdf
  • of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: January 14, 2010 Released: January 14, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that East Kentucky Network, LLC d/b/a Appalachian Wireless (``East Kentucky Network'') apparently willfully violated the hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in Section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). For this apparent violation, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of five thousand dollars ($5,000). II. BACKGROUND In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of individuals with hearing disabilities to access digital wireless telecommunications. The Commission established technical standards that digital wireless handsets must meet
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-80A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-80A1.pdf
  • FRN 0009043175 Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: January 14, 2010 Released: January 14, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that ZTE Corporation (``ZTE'') apparently willfully and repeatedly violated the wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in Section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and the public web site posting requirements set forth in Section 20.19(h) of the Rules. For these apparent violations, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of eighteen thousand dollars ($18,000). II. BACKGROUND In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of individuals with hearing disabilities to
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-81A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-81A1.pdf
  • ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-09-SE-151 NAL/Acct. No. 201032100013 FRN 0009221672 Notice OF apparent liability for forfeiture Adopted: January 14, 2010 Released: January 14, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that TCT Mobile Limited (``TCT Mobile'') apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), which requires the filing of status reports regarding the hearing aid compatibility of wireless handsets. We also find that TCT Mobile apparently willfully violated a Commission order by failing to respond to a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') from the Enforcement Bureau. Based on our review of facts and circumstances in this matter, we conclude that
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-82A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-82A1.pdf
  • Suite 401 Miami Beach, FL 33139 Re: File No. EB-09-SE-154 Dear Mr. Barutcu: This is an official CITATION, issued to Firefly Mobile Communications, Inc. (``Firefly''), a reseller of wireless services, pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for violating the digital wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject Firefly to monetary forfeitures. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of individuals with hearing disabilities to access digital wireless telecommunications. The Commission established technical standards that digital wireless handsets must meet
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-83A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-83A1.pdf
  • Liability for forfeiture Adopted: January 14, 2010 Released: January 14, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Locus Telecommunications, Inc. (``Locus''), a reseller of digital wireless services, apparently willfully violated the wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in Section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated the public web site posting requirements set forth in Section 20.19(h) of the Rules. For these apparent violations, we propose a total forfeiture in the amount of twelve thousand dollars ($12,000). II. BACKGROUND In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-84A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-84A1.pdf
  • 0012262259 Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: January 14, 2010 Released: January 14, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Airo Wireless, Inc. (``Airo'') apparently willfully and repeatedly violated the wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in Section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). For this apparent violation, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of twelve thousand dollars ($12,000). II. BACKGROUND In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of individuals with hearing disabilities to access digital wireless telecommunications. The Commission established technical standards that digital wireless handsets must meet
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-85A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-85A1.pdf
  • Support Center, One Arts Plaza 1722 Routh Street, Suite 1000 Dallas, Texas 75201-2506 Re: File No. EB-09-SE-167 Dear Mr. Hennen: This is an official CITATION, issued to 7-Eleven, Inc. (``7-Eleven'') pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for violating the digital wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), and the public web site posting requirements set forth in section 20.19(h) of the Rules. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject 7-Eleven to monetary forfeitures. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of individuals with hearing disabilities to
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-930A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-930A1.pdf
  • Road Suite 300 Portland, Oregon 97224-7574 Re: File No. EB-09-SE-175 Dear Mr. Marick: This is an official CITATION, issued to Consumer Cellular, Inc. (``Consumer Cellular''), a reseller of wireless services, pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for violating the digital wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject Consumer Cellular to monetary forfeitures. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of individuals with hearing disabilities to access digital wireless telecommunications. The Commission established technical standards that digital wireless handsets must
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-931A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-931A1.pdf
  • Road Bloomfield Hills, Michigan 48302-0336 Re: File No. EB-09-SE-168 Dear Mr. Bahri: This is an official CITATION issued to Air Voice Wireless, LLC (``Air Voice''), a reseller of wireless services, pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for violating the digital wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), and the public web site posting requirements set forth in section 20.19(h) of the Rules. We also find that Air Voice violated a Commission order by failing to respond to a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') from the Enforcement Bureau. As explained below, continued violations of the Commission's rules and the Act in this regard will
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-932A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-932A1.pdf
  • Owner eCallPlus 1523 N. Oakmont Drive Vernon Hills, Illinois 60061 Re: File No. EB-09-SE-173 Dear Ms. Kang: This is an official CITATION, issued to eCallPlus, a reseller of wireless services, pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for violating the digital wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject eCall to monetary forfeitures. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of individuals with hearing disabilities to access digital wireless telecommunications. The Commission established technical standards that digital wireless handsets must meet
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-933A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-933A1.pdf
  • Box 52085 Phoenix, Arizona 85072-2085 Re: File No. EB-09-SE-174 Dear Mr. O'Toole: This is an official CITATION issued to Circle K Stores, Inc. (``Circle K''), a reseller of wireless services, pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for violating the digital wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject Circle K to monetary forfeitures. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of individuals with hearing disabilities to access digital wireless telecommunications. The Commission established technical standards that digital wireless handsets must
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-934A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-934A1.pdf
  • Parklawn Drive, Suite U Rockville MD 20852 Re: File No. EB-09-SE-182 Dear Sir or Madam: This is an official CITATION issued to Movida Cellular (``Movida''), a reseller of wireless services, pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for violating the digital wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's rules (``rules''), and the public web site posting requirements set forth in section 20.19(h) of the rules. We also find that Movida violated a Commission order by failing to respond to an Enforcement Bureau Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') directing Movida to provide certain information and documents concerning its compliance with the digital wireless handset hearing aid compatibility
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-935A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-935A1.pdf
  • Dr. #310 San Diego, CA 92130-2004 Re: File No. EB-09-SE-177 Dear Ms. Herrick: This is an official CITATION issued to GreatCall, Inc., d/b/a Jitterbug (``Jitterbug''), a reseller of wireless services, pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for violating the digital wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject Jitterbug to monetary forfeitures. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of individuals with hearing disabilities to access digital wireless telecommunications. The Commission established technical standards that digital wireless handsets must meet
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-937A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-937A1.pdf
  • Parklawn Drive, Suite U Rockville MD 20852 Re: File No. EB-09-SE-179 Dear Sir or Madam: This is an official CITATION issued to Liberty Wireless (``Liberty''), a reseller of wireless services, pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for violating the digital wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's rules (``rules''), and the public web site posting requirements set forth in section 20.19(h) of the rules. We also find that Liberty violated a Commission order by failing to respond to an Enforcement Bureau Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') directing Liberty to provide certain information and documents concerning its compliance with the digital wireless handset hearing aid compatibility
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-938A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-938A1.pdf
  • 8108 S. Roberts Road Justice, Illinois 60458 Re: File No. EB-09-SE-185 Dear Mr. Ahmad: This is an official CITATION, issued to PlatinumTel Communications, LLC (``PlatinumTel''), a reseller of wireless services, pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for violating the digital wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), and the public web site posting requirements set forth in section 20.19(h) of the Rules. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject PlatinumTel to monetary forfeitures. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of individuals with hearing disabilities to
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-93A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-93A1.pdf
  • also contact the Enforcement Bureau on its TTY line at (202) 418-1148 for further information about this Enforcement Advisory, or the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau on its TTY line at (202) 418-7233 about the wireless hearing aid compatibility rules. Issued by: Chief, Enforcement Bureau -FCC- The full text of the hearing aid compatibility rules is set forth at 47 C.F.R. § 20.19. These rules include technical standards that digital wireless handsets must meet to be considered compatible with hearing aids operating in acoustic coupling and inductive coupling (telecoil) modes, and establish deadlines by which manufacturers and wireless service providers, including resellers and Mobile Virtual Network Operators, are required to offer specified numbers or percentages of handsets per air interface that comply with
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1002A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1002A1.pdf
  • ) File No.: EB-07-SE-281 Acct. No.: 201132100031 FRN: 0003010493 ORDER Adopted: June 9, 2011 Released: June 9, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Cincinnati Bell Wireless LLC (``CBW''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Bureau regarding CBW's compliance with section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's rules pertaining to the deployment of digital wireless hearing aid-compatible handsets. The Bureau and CBW have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1641A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1641A1.pdf
  • Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we propose a forfeiture of nineteen thousand five hundred dollars ($19,500) against Kaplan Telephone Company, Inc. d/b/a Pace Communications (``Pace''), a Global System for Mobile Communications-based (``GSM-based'') Tier III carrier, serving Vermilion Parish, Louisiana. As detailed herein, we find that Pace apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules (``Rules'') by failing to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of digital wireless handset models that met or exceeded the radio frequency interference standards for hearing aid compatibility set forth in section 20.19(b)(1) of the Rules, and that this apparent misconduct continued for seven consecutive months in 2010. II. BACKGROUND In the 2003 Hearing
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1809A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1809A1.pdf
  • Adopted: October 28, 2011 Released: October 28, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we propose a forfeiture in the amount of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) against Keystone Wireless, LLC d.b.a. Immix Wireless (``Keystone Wireless''). As detailed herein, we find that Keystone Wireless apparently willfully and repeatedly violated sections 20.19(c)(3)(ii) and 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''). We further find that some of the apparent misconduct continued for more than 11 of the 12 months in the reporting period. Specifically, Keystone Wireless apparently failed to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset models as set forth in the Rules. These hearing aid compatibility
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1812A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1812A1.pdf
  • October 28, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we propose a forfeiture in the amount of eighty two thousand five hundred dollars ($82,500) against Missouri RSA 5 Partnership d/b/a Chariton Valley Wireless Services (``Chariton Valley''). As detailed herein, we find that Chariton Valley apparently willfully and repeatedly violated sections 20.19(c)(3)(ii) and 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''). We further find that some of the apparent misconduct continued for 10 of the 12 months in the 2010 reporting period. Specifically, Chariton Valley apparently failed to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset models as set forth in the Rules. The hearing aid compatibility requirements
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1844A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1844A1.pdf
  • EB-10-SE-115 Acct. No.: 201232100003 FRN: 0004334538 ORDER Adopted: November 8, 2011 Released: November 9, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') of the Federal Communications Commission and OTZ Telecommunications, Inc. (``OTZ''). The Consent Decree resolves and terminates the Bureau's investigation into OTZ's compliance with section 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules concerning the deployment of digital wireless hearing aid-compatible handsets. These hearing aid compatibility requirements serve to ensure that consumers with hearing loss have access to advanced telecommunications services. The Bureau and OTZ have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1973A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1973A1.pdf
  • ORDER Adopted: December 14, 2011 Released: December 14, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') of the Federal Communications Commission and Cross Wireless, L.L.C. d/b/a Sprocket Wireless, L.L.C. (``Cross Wireless''). The Consent Decree resolves and terminates the Bureau's investigation into Cross Wireless's compliance with sections 20.19(c)(3)(ii) and 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules concerning the deployment of digital wireless hearing aid-compatible handsets. These hearing aid compatibility requirements serve to ensure that consumers with hearing loss have access to advanced telecommunications services. The Bureau and Cross Wireless have negotiated the Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2034A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2034A1.pdf
  • Adopted: December 23, 2011 Released: December 23, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we propose a forfeiture in the amount of thirty-nine thousand dollars ($39,000) against North Central Wireless LC d/b/a i wireless (``North Central''). As detailed herein, we find that North Central apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''). We further find that the apparent misconduct continued for seven consecutive months during the 2010 reporting period. Specifically, North Central apparently failed to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset models as set forth in the Rules. These hearing aid compatibility requirements serve to ensure that consumers with
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2035A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2035A1.pdf
  • Liability for forfeiture Adopted: December 23, 2011 Released: December 23, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we propose a forfeiture in the amount of thirty thousand dollars ($30,000) against Affordable Phone Services, Inc. (``Affordable Phone''). As detailed herein, we find that Affordable Phone apparently willfully and repeatedly violated sections 20.19(c)(3)(ii) and 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''). Specifically, Affordable Phone apparently failed to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset models as set forth in the Rules. These hearing aid compatibility requirements serve to ensure that consumers with hearing loss have access to advanced telecommunications services. II. BACKGROUND In the 2003 Hearing Aid
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2042A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2042A1.pdf
  • 23, 2011 Released: December 23, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Admonishment (``NAL''), we propose a forfeiture in the amount of thirty thousand dollars ($30,000) and issue an admonishment against Airadigm Communications, Inc. dba Airfire Wireless (``Airadigm''). As detailed herein, we find that Airadigm apparently willfully and repeatedly violated sections 20.19(c)(3)(ii) and 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''). Specifically, Airadigm apparently failed to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset models as set forth in the Rules. These hearing aid compatibility requirements serve to ensure that consumers with hearing loss have access to advanced telecommunications services. BACKGROUND In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order,
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2060A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2060A1.pdf
  • forfeiture Adopted: December 23, 2011 Released: December 23, 2011 By the Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we propose a forfeiture in the amount of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000) against Caprock Cellular Limited Partnership (``Caprock''). As detailed herein, we find that Caprock apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 20.19(c)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''). Specifically, Caprock apparently failed to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset models as set forth in the Rules. These hearing aid compatibility requirements serve to ensure that consumers with hearing loss have access to advanced telecommunications services. II. BACKGROUND In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2061A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2061A1.pdf
  • Released: December 23, 2011 By the Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we propose a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-one thousand dollars ($21,000) against iSmart Mobile, LLC d/b/a Big Sky Mobile (``Big Sky''). As detailed herein, we find that Big Sky apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 20.19(c)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''). We further find that the apparent misconduct continued for the entire 2010 calendar year. Specifically, Big Sky apparently failed to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset models as set forth in the Rules. These hearing aid compatibility requirements serve to ensure that consumers with hearing loss have
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2075A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2075A1.pdf
  • Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: December 28, 2011 Released: December 28, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we propose a forfeiture in the amount of fifty-one thousand dollars ($51,000) against General Communication, Inc. (``GCI''). As detailed herein, we find that GCI apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''). We further find that this apparent misconduct continued for seven consecutive months during the 2010 calendar year. Specifically, GCI apparently failed to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset models that operate on the GSM air interface as set forth in the Rules. These hearing aid compatibility requirements
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2076A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2076A1.pdf
  • Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: December 28, 2011 Released: December 29, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we propose a forfeiture in the amount of seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000) against Centennial Communications Corporation (``Centennial''). As detailed herein, we find that Centennial apparently willfully and repeatedly violated sections 20.19(d)(3)(ii) and 20.19(e)(2) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''). Specifically, Centennial apparently failed to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset models that operate on the GSM and WCDMA air interfaces as set forth in the Rules. These hearing aid compatibility requirements serve to ensure that consumers with hearing loss have access to advanced telecommunications
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2077A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2077A1.pdf
  • Liability for forfeiture Adopted: December 29, 2011 Released: December 29, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we propose a forfeiture in the amount of forty-eight thousand dollars ($48,000) against Metropolitan Telecommunications Holding Company d.b.a. MetTel (``Metropolitan''). As detailed herein, we find that Metropolitan apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''). We further find that this apparent misconduct continued for the entire 2010 calendar year. Specifically, Metropolitan apparently failed to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset models that operate on the WCDMA and GSM air interfaces as set forth in the Rules. These hearing aid compatibility requirements serve
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2078A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2078A1.pdf
  • December 28, 2011 Released: December 29, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Admonishment, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand five hundred dollars ($25,500) and issue an admonishment against Locus Telecommunications, Inc. (``Locus''). As detailed herein, we find that Locus apparently willfully and repeatedly violated sections 20.19(c)(3)(ii) and 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''). We further find that some of this apparent misconduct continued for the entire 2010 calendar year. Specifically, Locus apparently failed to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset models that operate on the GSM air interface as set forth in the Rules. These hearing aid compatibility
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2079A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2079A1.pdf
  • apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: December 28, 2011 Released: December 28, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we propose a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand five hundred dollars ($25,500) against NEP Cellcorp, Inc. (``NEP''). As detailed herein, we find that NEP apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 20.19(c)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''). We further find that this apparent misconduct continued for five consecutive months during the 2010 calendar year. Specifically, NEP apparently failed to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset models as set forth in the Rules. These hearing aid compatibility requirements serve to ensure that consumers with hearing
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2080A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2080A1.pdf
  • of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: December 28, 2011 Released: December 28, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we propose a forfeiture in the amount of thirty thousand dollars ($30,000) against Maximum Communications Cellular, LLC (``MaxCell''). As detailed herein, we find that MaxCell apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 20.19(c)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''). Specifically, MaxCell apparently failed to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset models that operate on the GSM and WCDMA air interfaces as set forth in the Rules. These hearing aid compatibility requirements serve to ensure that consumers with hearing loss have access to advanced telecommunications services. II.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-257A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-257A1.pdf
  • ORDER Adopted: February 17, 2011 Released: February 17, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Pantech Co., Ltd. and its wholly owned U.S.-based subsidiary, Pantech Wireless, Inc. (together ``Pantech''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Bureau regarding Pantech's compliance with sections 20.19(h) and (i) of the Commission's rules concerning the wireless handset hearing aid compatibility web site posting and hearing aid compatibility status reporting requirements, and sections 20.19(c)(1) and (d)(1) of the Commission's rules pertaining to the hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset deployment requirements. The Bureau and Pantech have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve this matter. A
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-3A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-3A1.pdf
  • January 19, 2011 By the Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and ACS Wireless, Inc. (``ACSW''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau and cancels the Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued against ACSW for possible violations of Sections 20.19 (h) and (i)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), regarding compliance with the Commission's regulations pertaining to hearing aid compatibility for wireless handsets. The Bureau and ACSW have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-57A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-57A1.pdf
  • each year. This year, however, that deadline falls on a weekend and is followed by a federal holiday, which moves the deadline to the next business day, January 18, 2011. See Hearing Aid Compatibility Status Reporting at http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac. Service providers offering two or fewer digital wireless handset models per air interface qualify for the de minimis exception (47 C.F.R. § 20.19(e)). Although these entities are exempt from most of the hearing aid compatibility deployment requirements in 47 C.F.R. § 20.19, they must still comply with the reporting requirement in 47 C.F.R. § 20.19(i). The Commission recently limited the de minimis exception so that it is unavailable to service providers that are not small entities after an initial two-year period. See Amendment
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-802A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-802A1.pdf
  • corrective measures are not sufficient to avoid enforcement action.''). Forfeiture Order, 2011 WL 742240, at *3, para. 8. See e.g., Champaign Tel. Co. D/B/A CT Commc'ns, Inc., Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 25 FCC Rcd 17814, 17818-19, para. 9 (Spec. Enf. Div. 2010) (construing a failure to file the hearing aid compatibility status report required under section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's rules as ``a continuing violation that continues until . . . cured''); STI Prepaid, 25 FCC Rcd at 17845, para. 20 (same); Lightyear Network Solutions, LLC, Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 25 FCC Rcd 16212, 16217, para. 12 (Spec. Enf. Div. 2010) (same); Alpheus Commc'ns, LP, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 25 FCC
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-285A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-285A1.pdf
  • 200832100016 FRN: 0005599634 ORDER Adopted: February 27, 2012 Released: February 27, 2012 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (Bureau) of the Federal Communications Commission and Epic Touch Co., Inc. (Epic Touch). The Consent Decree resolves and terminates the Bureau's investigation into Epic Touch's compliance with Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's rules (Rules) concerning the deployment of digital wireless hearing aid-compatible handsets. The hearing aid compatibility requirements serve to ensure that consumers with hearing loss have access to advanced telecommunications services. The Bureau and Epic Touch have negotiated the Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-628A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-628A1.pdf
  • Acct. No.: 20123210023 FRN: 0010723591 ORDER Adopted: May 11, 2012 Released: May 11, 2012 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (Bureau) of the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) and Ztar Mobile, Inc. (Ztar). The Consent Decree resolves and terminates the Bureau's investigations into Ztar's compliance with Section 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules (Rules) concerning the deployment of digital wireless hearing aid-compatible handsets and with Section 222 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the Act), Section 64.2009(e) of the Rules, and the EPIC CPNI Order, concerning the filing of an annual Customer Proprietary Network Information certification. The Bureau and Ztar have negotiated the Consent Decree that resolves
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-114A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-114A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-114A1.txt
  • or wireline local exchange service; and (4) it is technically and operationally feasible for the service or device to support E911. Applying these criteria, the Commission determined in the E911 Scope Order to amend its rules to include additional service offerings within the scope of the E911 requirements, including telematics, and resold and prepaid mobile wireless services. Sections 20.18(a) and 20.19(a) currently specify that service providers within certain enumerated radio services (cellular, PCS, and SMR) are subject to the 911/E911 and hearing aid-compatibility requirements. These rule sections have not been expanded to include licensees providing service in later authorized, additional wireless services such as in the 700 MHz Band, although many of the services permitted in the 700 MHz Band can
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-132A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-132A1.pdf
  • that would hamper or defeat the network-based E911 solution. If a network provider accepts a non-carrier device or application and if the device or application subsequently causes a violation of our rules, we will apply the same third-party liability provisions as in the wireline context. We find that a wireless service provider's obligations under our hearing aid compatibility rule, Section 20.19, are not affected by the obligations we impose here. Because equipment manufacturers have an independent obligation to satisfy our hearing aid compatibility rules, a wireless service provider may not refuse to connect a handset on the grounds that it is not hearing aid-compatible. Under the Commission's rules, the extent of a wireless service provider's compliance with such obligations is not
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-192A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-192A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-192A1.txt
  • (HLAA), Gallaudet University Technology Access Program (TAP), and Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center on Telecommunications Access (RERC). As recommended in the Staff Report, we tentatively conclude substantially to adopt the provisions of the Joint Consensus Plan, and we seek comment on this tentative conclusion and several related matters. In particular, we tentatively conclude to modify the handset deployment deadlines in Section 20.19 along the framework proposed in the Joint Consensus Plan, including (1) modifying the upcoming February 18, 2008 benchmark that requires that manufacturers and wireless service providers ensure that at least 50 percent of their handset models over each air interface meet a U3/M3 or better rating for radio frequency (RF) interference reduction and (2) imposing new benchmarks for deploying handsets
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-99A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-99A1.pdf
  • 23. Id. Id. AT&T Comments at 15. Alert Systems Comments at 18. Id. Wireless RERC Comments at 11. Id. at 11-12. Wireless RERC also states that CMS providers should notify those subscribers whose mobile devices require upgrading to support CMAS. Id. at 12. AAPC Comments at 7-8. Id. at 18. DataFM Comments at 12-13. MetroPCS Comments, citing 47 C.F.R. § 20.19. CellCast Comments at 43-44. The CMSAAC recommendations state that ``[a] unique vibration cadence (if supported by the mobile device) should be provided as well as a unique audio attention signal.'' CMSAAC Recommendations at § 5.5.2. To the extent that this language implies that CMAS-capable mobile devices do not have to supply a unique vibration cadence, we disagree. Rather, we believe
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-39A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-39A1.pdf
  • FRN: 0006945950 NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE Adopted: April 13, 2012 Released: April 13, 2012 By the Commission: INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of eight hundred nineteen thousand dollars ($819,000) against T-Mobile USA, Inc. (T-Mobile). As detailed herein, we find that T-Mobile apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Sections 20.19(c)(2) and 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's rules (Rules). We further find that this apparent misconduct persisted for the two-year period, 2009-2010. Specifically, T-Mobile, a nationwide wireless carrier with more than 33 million customers and more than $21 billion dollars in annual revenue, apparently failed to offer the required number of hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset models as set forth in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-567A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-567A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-567A1.txt
  • whichever is greater. By February 18, 2008, the Commission requires that 50 % of all digital wireless phone models offered by a manufacturer or carrier be compliant with the reduced RF emissions requirements. CTIA and Verizon Wireless challenge the Commission's imposition of the 25 % and the 50 % requirement. For instance, Verizon Wireless petitions the Commission to modify Section 20.19 (c) which it argues imposes a stricter requirement on Tier I carriers than on all other wireless carriers. The Availability of HAC Handsets: In the Report and Order, the Commission requires, that within two years, each digital wireless handset manufacturer and each carrier providing digital wireless services make commercially available at least two handsets for each air interface in its
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1134A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1134A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1134A1.txt
  • digital wireless phones. Accordingly, consistent with 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.241(b) and 2.947(a), OET will accept applications for certification of equipment tested and rated under the revised draft standard ``American National Standard for Methods of Measurement of Compatibility between Wireless Communication Devices and Hearing Aids, ANSI C63.19-2005'' for all wireless phone hearing aid compatibility testing and rating, as specified in Section 20.19 of the rules, effective immediately. Applicants for certification may rely on either the 2001 or 2005 version of ANSI C63.19 and must identify which version they are using for compatibility testing and for rating wireless phones, consistent with 47 C.F.R. § 2.947 (b). OET will certify equipment that meets the compatibility requirements which has been tested and rated using the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-20A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-20A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-20A1.txt
  • § 20.3 Definitions. § 20.5 Citizenship. § 20.6 CMRS spectrum aggregation limit. § 20.7 Mobile services. § 20.9 Commercial mobile radio service. § 20.11 Interconnection to facilities of local exchange carriers. § 20.12 Resale and roaming. § 20.13 State petitions for authority to regulate rates. § 20.15 Requirements under Title II of the Communications Act. § 20.18 911 Service. § 20.19 Hearing aid-compatible mobile handsets. § 20.20 Conditions applicable to provisions of CMRS service by incumbent Local Exchange Carriers. Comments Any comments are noted section-by-section in the following analysis of each rule section in Part 20 relevant to the Biennial Review. Analysis Staff recommendations are noted section-by-section in the following analysis of each rule section in Part 20 relevant to the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1215A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1215A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1215A1.txt
  • for digital wireless phones. Accordingly, consistent with 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.241(b) and 2.947(a), OET will accept applications for certification of equipment tested and rated under the revised standard ``American National Standard for Methods of Measurement of Compatibility between Wireless Communication Devices and Hearing Aids, ANSI C63.19-2006'' for all wireless phone hearing aid compatibility testing and rating, as specified in Section 20.19 of the rules, effective immediately. Applicants for certification may rely on only one version of the ANSI C63.19 standard, 2001, 2005 or 2006, and must identify which version they are using for compatibility testing and for rating wireless phones, consistent with 47 C.F.R. § 2.947 (b). Allowing the use of the new measurement and rating procedures now should assist manufacturers
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2285A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2285A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2285A1.txt
  • telecoil avoids the feedback that often results from putting a hearing aid up against a telephone earpiece, can help prevent exposure to over amplification, and eliminates background noise, providing improved access to the telephone. Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 16763 ¶ 22. See Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 16780 ¶ 65; 47 C.F.R. § 20.19(c). See 47 C.F.R. § 20.19(e)(1)-(2). The de minimis exception applies on a per air interface basis, and provides that manufacturers or mobile service providers that offer two or fewer digital wireless handsets in the U.S. are exempt from the requirements of the hearing aid-compatibility rules. For mobile service providers that obtain handsets only from manufacturers that offer two or fewer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2542A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2542A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2542A1.txt
  • 5-9. Id. at 2. Id. Id. See id. ACSW Petition at 1. See AMPS Sunset Order, 17 FCC Rcd at 18407, 18408 ¶¶ 10, 12. Id. at 18408 ¶ 12. See id. at 18413 ¶ 22. See ACSW Petition at 6-9. ACSW states that it offers at least two CDMA handsets that meet the U-3/M-3 hearing-aid compatibility standard under Section 20.19. See ACSW Letter dated September 25, 2006 at 1, citing 47 C.F.R. § 20.19. As part of this condition, ACSW must reasonably allow affected individuals to test ACSW hearing aid-compliant digital phones for compatibility with their hearing aids. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 06-2542 Federal Communications Commission DA 06-2542 hÔ � � � F " ­
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-102A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-102A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-102A1.txt
  • for extension of September 16, 2005 deadline: Eighteen petitions were filed in 2005 seeking an extension of the September 16, 2005 deadline by which public mobile service providers and digital wireless handset manufacturers not subject to the de minimis exception were required to include in their handset offerings at least two handset models per air interface that comply with § 20.19(b)(1) of the Commission's rules. Section 20.19(b)(1) provides that a wireless handset is deemed hearing aid-compatible if it receives, for radio frequency interference, at least a U3 rating as set forth in American National Standards Institute (ANSI) standard document C63.19, ``American National Standard for Methods of Measurement of Compatibility between Wireless Communications Devices and Hearing Aids.'' Petitioners seeking an extension of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-131A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-131A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-131A1.txt
  • hearing disabled to analog phones is the real solution.'' Id. at 18466-18467. Id. at 18419 ¶¶31-32. Upon release of the AMPS Sunset Order, there were three nationwide cellular service providers subject to the AMPS requirement, AT&T Wireless, Cingular Wireless, and Verizon Wireless. AT&T Wireless subsequently merged with Cingular Wireless. Id. at ¶32. See supra note 4. See 47 C.F.R. § 20.19 (hearing aid-compatible mobile handsets). Filers may incorporate by reference information previously provided to the Commission pursuant to reporting requirements set out in the Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, in which the Commission required wireless carriers and handset manufacturers to report on compliance efforts regarding various benchmarks for handset compatibility every six months from 2004 through 2006, and then annually in 2007
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1867A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1867A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1867A1.txt
  • 0001523125 Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: April 25, 2007 Released: April 25, 2007 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find IT&E Overseas, Inc. (``IT&E'') apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of sixteen thousand dollars ($16,000) for its willful and repeated violations of Section 20.19(f) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). The apparent violations involve IT&E's failure to comply with the labeling requirements for digital wireless hearing aid-compatible handsets. Background In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission took a number of actions to further the ability of persons with hearing disabilities to access digital wireless telecommunications. Among other actions, the Commission required manufacturers and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2118A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2118A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2118A1.txt
  • File No. EB-07-SE-141 NAL/Acct. No. 200732100033 FRN # 0001699776 Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: May 21, 2007 Released: May 22, 2007 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Pine Telephone Company d/b/a Pine Cellular Phones, Inc. (``Pine'') apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(f) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to comply with the labeling requirements for digital wireless hearing aid-compatible handsets. For Pine's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of sixteen thousand dollars ($16,000). II. BACKGROUND In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission took a number of actions to further the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2324A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2324A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2324A1.txt
  • operating and maintaining two systems warrant relief. Request at 7-8; Supplement at 1-2. Cost considerations alone, however, are an insufficient basis to support a waiver of the analog service requirement. See Petition of ACS Wireless, Inc. for Limited Waiver of Analog Service Rule, Order, 21 FCC Rcd 14594 ¶8 (WTB 2006). See Waiver Request at 4, citing 47 C.F.R. § 20.19. Waiver Request at 4. Comments at 2. Id. at 5. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.925(b)(3)(i)-(ii). As part of this condition, Corr must reasonably allow affected individuals to test Corr's hearing aid-compliant GSM phones for compatibility with their hearing aids. The certification must be signed by a licensee principal and sent to the Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3524A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3524A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3524A1.txt
  • Litchfield County Cellular, Inc. d/b/a Ramcell of Kentucky, and Litchfield County Cellular, Inc. d/b/a Ramcell of Oregon (``Ramcell Licensees''). The Consent Decree terminates the Bureau's investigations into the Ramcell Licensees' compliance with the Enhanced 911 requirements set forth in Section 20.18(g)(1)(i)-(v) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), and the hearing aid compatibility requirements for digital wireless handsets set forth in Section 20.19(c)(2) of the Rules. The Enforcement Bureau and the Ramcell Licensees have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve these matters and terminate the investigations. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. Based on the record before us, we conclude that no substantial or material questions of fact exist with respect to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4151A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4151A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4151A1.txt
  • as well as to manufacturers of wireless phones used in the delivery of such services. However, because relevant technical standards have been established to date only for Broadband Personal Communications Services, Cellular Radio Telephone Service, and Specialized Mobile Radio Services in the 800 MHz and 900 MHz bands, only those services are currently subject to the specific requirements under Section 20.19 of the rules. In the 700 MHz Service Report and Order adopted in April 2007, the Commission established a timetable for the development of the necessary technical standards for new services and frequency bands that have governing service rules in place and for incorporation of requirements based on those standards into its rules. Specifically, the Commission stated its expectation that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4339A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4339A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4339A1.txt
  • File No. EB-07-SE-142 NAL/Acct. No. 200832100001 FRN # 0007435902 Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: October 18, 2007 Released: October 22, 2007 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that AST Telecom, LLC d/b/a Blue Sky Communications (``Blue Sky'') apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(f) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to comply with the labeling requirements for digital wireless hearing aid-compatible handsets. For Blue Sky's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of eight thousand dollars ($8,000). II. BACKGROUND In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission took a number of actions to further
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4354A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4354A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4354A2.txt
  • 11/30/08 3060-0991 AM Measurement Data 05/31/08 3060-0992 Secs. 54.507(d)(1)-(4) and CC Docket No. 96-45 01/31/08 3060-0994 Flexibility for Delivery of Communications by Mobile Satellite Service Providers in the 2 GHz Band, the L-Band, and the 1.6/2.4 GHz Band 01/31/10 3060-0995 Sec. 1.2105(c) 05/31/08 3060-0996 AM Auction Section 307(b) Submissions 05/31/08 3060-0997 Sec. 52.15(k) 05/31/08 3060-0998 Sec. 87.109 08/31/10 3060-0999 Sec. 20.19 09/30/10 3060-1000 Sec. 87.147 01/31/08 3060-1001 FCC 337 05/31/08 3060-1003 Communications Disaster Information Reporting System (DIRS) 07/31/10 3060-1004 Revision of the Commission's Rules to Ensure Compatibility with Enhanced 911 Emergency Calling Systems 09/30/09 3060-1005 Numbering Resource Optimization - Phase 3 06/30/08 3060-1007 Streamlining and Other Revisions of Part 25 of the Commission's Rules 07/31/10 3060-1008 Reallocation and Service Rules for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4481A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4481A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4481A1.txt
  • ) File No. EB-07-SE-144 NAL/Acct. No. 200832100004 FRN # 0001607175 Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: October 31, 2007 Released: November 1, 2007 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that South Central Utah Telephone Association, Inc. (``South Central'') apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(f) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to comply with the labeling requirements for digital wireless hearing aid-compatible handsets. For South Central's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-four thousand dollars ($24,000). II. BACKGROUND In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission took a number of actions to further
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4745A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4745A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4745A1.txt
  • 2007 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Memorandum Opinion and Order, we admonish XIT Telecommunications & Technology, Ltd. d/b/a XIT Cellular (``XIT'') for failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings two handset models that meet the hearing aid compatibility requirements for radio frequency interference by September 16, 2005 in violation of Section 20.19(c)(2)(i)(B)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). BACKGROUND In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission took a number of actions to further the ability of persons with hearing disabilities to access digital wireless telecommunications. Among other actions, the Commission required manufacturers and digital wireless service providers to collectively take steps to increase the number of hearing aid-compatible handset models available,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-674A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-674A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-674A1.txt
  • and facilitate effective and efficient law enforcement. Accordingly, pursuant to our Section 11 biennial review, we do not find that this rule is ``no longer necessary in the public interest as the result of meaningful economic competition between providers of such [telecommunications] service.'' The staff therefore recommends that neither modification nor repeal of these rules is warranted. part 20, Section 20.19 - Hearing Aid Compatible Mobile Handsets Description Section 20.19 requires CMRS providers and manufacturers of wireless phones to comply with guidelines established by the Commission for the implementation of the Hearing Aid Compatibility Act. The Commission requires compliance by all such providers and manufacturers to ensure that individuals with hearing disabilities receive the benefits of wireless telecommunications - including emergency,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1087A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1087A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1087A1.txt
  • required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Joseph Levin, Spectrum & Competition Policy Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, (202) 418-0640. See In the Matter of Section 68.4(a) of the Commission's Rules Governing Hearing Aid-Compatible Telephones, Petitions for Waiver of Section 20.19 of the Commission's Rules, WT Docket 01-309, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 3352 (2008). The related licensees are: Andrew Telephone Company, Barnes City Telephone Company, Benton Linn Wireless, Bernard Communications, Brooklyn Mutual Telecommunications Coop., Casey Cable Co., Cedar County PCS, LLC, Cedar-Wapsie Communications, Inc., Center Junction Telephone Co., Central Iowa Wireless, Central Scott Telephone Co., Clear Lake Independent
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1108A1.pdf
  • conformity with the Commission's decision in the E911 Scope Order. g. Hearing Aid-Compatible Wireless Handsets For reasons similar to those discussed in the E911 section above, the FCC determined that all digital CMRS providers, including providers of such services inthe 700 MHz Commercial Services Band and the AWS-1 and BRS/EBS bands, should be subject to hearing aid compatibility requirements under §20.19 to the extent they offer real-time, two-way switched voice or data service that is interconnected with the public switched network and utilizes an in-network switching facility that enables the provider to reuse frequencies and accomplish seamless hand-offs of subscriber calls.In addition, manufacturers of wireless handsets that are capable of providing such service also should be made subject to the applicable
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1157A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1157A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1157A1.txt
  • EB-07-SE-269 Acct. No. 200832100047 FRN No. 0001623321 Adopted: May 19, 2008 Released: May 21, 2008 By the Deputy Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Custer Telephone Cooperative, Inc. (``Custer''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Custer for possible violations of section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') regarding the inductive coupling hearing aid compatibility requirements. 2. The Bureau and Custer have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve these matters. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1186A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1186A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1186A1.txt
  • ) File No. EB-07-SE-273 Acct. No. 200832100048 FRN No. 0004250056 Adopted: June 2, 2008 Released: June 10, 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Choice Wireless, LC (``Choice''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Choice for possible violation of section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') regarding the inductive coupling hearing aid compatibility requirements. The Bureau and Choice have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find that the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1291A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1291A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1291A1.txt
  • 0001753771 Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: June 2, 2008 Released: June 4, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Farmers Cellular Telephone, Inc. (``Farmers Cellular''), a Global System for Mobile Communications (``GSM'') carrier serving rural Alabama, apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by September 18, 2006. For Farmers Cellular's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of thirty thousand dollars ($30,000). II. BACKGROUND In the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1314A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1314A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1314A1.txt
  • forfeiture of sixty thousand dollars ($60,000) against SunCom Wireless, Inc. (``SunCom''), a Global System for Mobile Communications-based (``GSM-based'') Tier II carrier, serving most of North and South Carolina, parts of the bordering states of Virginia, Tennessee and Georgia (``mainland''), and Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. As detailed herein, we find that SunCom apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by the September 18, 2006 deadline. II. BACKGROUND In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of individuals with hearing disabilities to access
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1369A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1369A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1369A1.txt
  • of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: June 9, 2008 Released: June 11, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Union Telephone Company (``Union''), a Global System for Mobile Communications-based (``GSM'') carrier serving rural Wyoming, Colorado, Utah, and Idaho, apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings, by September 18, 2006, at least two models that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility. For Union's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000). II. BACKGROUND In the 2003
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1398A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1398A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1398A1.txt
  • FRN # 0002377901 Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: June 11, 2008 Released: June 13, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that PinPoint Wireless, Inc. (``PinPoint''), a Global System for Mobile Communications-based (``GSM'') carrier serving rural Nebraska, apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by September 18, 2006. For PinPoint's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of thirty thousand dollars ($30,000). II. BACKGROUND In the 2003
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1423A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1423A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1423A1.txt
  • # 0003766201 Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: June 16, 2008 Released: June 18, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Blanca Telephone Company (``Blanca''), a Code Division Multiple Access-based (``CDMA-based'') Tier III carrier, serving rural Colorado, apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by the September 18, 2006 deadline. For Blanca's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000). II. BACKGROUND In
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1424A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1424A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1424A1.txt
  • Centennial Communications Corp. ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-08-SE-117 NAL/Acct. No. 200832100055 FRN No. 0003296480 Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: June 17, 2008 Released: June 17, 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Centennial Communications Corp. (``Centennial'') apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models for the GSM air interface in its mainland wireless network that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by September 18, 2006. For Centennial's apparent violation, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-14A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-14A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-14A1.txt
  • ) File No. EB-07-SE-282 NAL/Acct. No. 200832100009 FRN # 0004285698 Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: January 2, 2008 Released: January 3, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that South Canaan Cellular Communications Company, L.P. (``South Canaan'') apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by September 18, 2006. For South Canaan's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000). II. BACKGROUND In the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1625A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1625A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1625A1.txt
  • No. 200832100056 FRN No. 0015360456 Adopted: July 11, 2008 Released: July 14, 2008 By the Deputy Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and NE Colorado Cellular, Inc., dba Viaero Wireless (``Viaero''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Viaero for possible violation of section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') regarding inductive coupling hearing aid compatibility handset requirements. The Bureau and Viaero have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find that the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1716A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1716A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1716A1.txt
  • EB-08-SE-119 Acct. No. 200832100059 FRN No. 0002701688 Adopted: July 30, 2008 Released: August 1, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Airadigm Communications, Inc. (``Airadigm''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Airadigm for possible violations of section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') regarding the inductive coupling hearing aid compatibility requirements. The Bureau and Airadigm have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find that the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1719A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1719A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1719A1.txt
  • 25, 2008 Released: July 28, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and IT&E Overseas, Inc. (``IT&E''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation and a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') by the Bureau against IT&E for possible violations of section 20.19(f) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') regarding IT&E's failure to comply with the labeling requirements for digital wireless hearing aid-compatible handsets, and an investigation by the Bureau against IT&E for possible violations of section 20.19(d)(2) of the Rules regarding IT&E's failure to offer at least two digital wireless handset models meeting the Commission's standards for inductive coupling by the compliance deadline.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1828A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1828A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1828A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) File No. EB-07-SE-327 NAL/Acct. No. 200832100064 FRN # 0003804101 Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: July 31, 2008 Released: July 31, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Corr Wireless Communications, LLC (``Corr'') apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by September 18, 2006. For Corr's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of thirty thousand dollars ($30,000). II. BACKGROUND In the 2003
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-182A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-182A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-182A1.txt
  • File No. EB-07-SE-272 NAL/Acct. No. 200832100015 FRN # 0001634443 Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: February 8, 2008 Released: February 11, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Cable & Communications Corporation dba Mid-Rivers Cellular (``Mid-Rivers Cellular'') apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by September 18, 2006. For Mid-Rivers Cellular's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000). II. BACKGROUND In the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2451A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2451A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2451A1.txt
  • of six thousand dollars ($6,000). We also admonish ASTCA for failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two handset models that meet the hearing aid compatibility requirements for radio frequency interference and two handset models that meet the hearing aid compatibility requirements for inductive coupling capability by the compliance deadlines in apparent violation of former Sections 20.19(c)(2)(i)(B)(1) and 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). II. BACKGROUND In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of individuals with hearing disabilities to access digital wireless telecommunications. The Commission established technical standards that digital wireless handsets must meet to be considered compatible with hearing aids operating in acoustic coupling and inductive coupling
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2735A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2735A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2735A1.txt
  • the Commission's hearing aid compatibility requirements. Status reports are due to be filed with the Commission by January 15, 2009. Manufacturers and service providers may, but are not required to, submit their reports on new FCC Form 655. Whether or not they use FCC Form 655, parties must ensure that their reports include all of the information required in Section 20.19(i) of the Commission's rules. In the Hearing Aid Compatibility First Report and Order, the Commission established new timelines for the filing of hearing aid compatibility status reports and delegated to the Bureau authority to prescribe a template for the reports. Additionally, the Commission adopted several new reporting content requirements. Specifically, the Commission required, among other things, that: (1) manufacturers and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2735A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2735A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2735A2.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Attachment Instructions for Hearing Aid Compatibility Status Report (FCC Form 655) Digital commercial radio service providers and manufacturers of devices used in the delivery of these services must use this electronic form to provide the Commission with the hearing aid compatibility information required pursuant to 47 CFR § 20.19(i)(2) and (i)(3). Manufacturers shall submit reports on January 15, 2009 and on July 15, 2009, and on an annual basis on July 15 thereafter. Service providers shall submit reports on January 15, 2009, and annually thereafter. Section 1 Provide the requested information for the reporting entity. If the report is being filed by an agent on behalf of a manufacturer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2822A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2822A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2822A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit „ Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Section 68.4(a) of the Commission's Rules Governing Hearing Aid-Compatible Telephones Petition of NEP Cellcorp, Inc. for Waiver of Section 20.19 of the Commission's Rules ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) WT Docket No. 01-309 Adopted: December 30, 2008 Released: December 31, 2008 By the Acting Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau: Introduction In this Memorandum Opinion and Order, we address a petition filed on March 21, 2008, by NEP Cellcorp, Inc., a Tier III carrier, that requests a waiver
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2826A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2826A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2826A1.txt
  • By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we propose a forfeiture of twelve thousand dollars ($12,000) against NEP Cellcorp, Inc. (``NEP''), a Global System for Mobile Communications-based (``GSM-based'') Tier III carrier, serving rural parts of Pennsylvania. As detailed herein, we find that NEP apparently willfully and repeatedly violated former Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), by failing to timely include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility. II. BACKGROUND In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of individuals with hearing disabilities to access digital wireless telecommunications. The Commission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-462A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-462A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-462A1.txt
  • Company, Inc. ) ) ) ) File No. EB-07-SE-284 NAL/Acct. No. 200832100016 FRN # 0005599634 Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: February 26, 2008 Released: February 28, 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Epic Touch Company, Inc. (``Epic Touch'') apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two handset models that meet the inductive coupling standard for hearing aid compatibility by September 18, 2006. For Epic Touch's apparent violations, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of thirty thousand dollars ($30,000). II. BACKGROUND In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-463A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-463A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-463A1.txt
  • File No. EB-07-SE-260 NAL/Acct. No. 200832100017 FRN # 0007435902 Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: February 26, 2008 Released: February 27, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that AST Telecom, LLC d/b/a Blue Sky Communications (``Blue Sky'') apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by September 18, 2006. For Blue Sky's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of fifteen thousand hundred dollars ($15,000). II. BACKGROUND In
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-535A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-535A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-535A1.txt
  • EB-08-SE-109 NAL/Acct. No. 200832100020 FRN # 0005769302 Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: March 7, 2008 Released: March 11, 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that CTC Telecom, Inc. (``CTC''), a Code Division Multiple Access-based (``CDMA-based'') carrier serving rural Idaho, apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by September 18, 2006. For CTC's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of thirty thousand dollars ($30,000). II. BACKGROUND In the 2003
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-537A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-537A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-537A1.txt
  • 200732100033 FRN No. 0001699776 Adopted: March 17, 2008 Released: March 19, 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Pine Telephone Company, Inc. d/b/a Pine Cellular Phones, Inc. (``Pine''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Pine for possible violations of section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') regarding the inductive coupling hearing aid compatibility requirements and an investigation and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture against Pine for possible violations of section 20.19(f) of the Rules regarding the hearing aid compatibility labeling requirements. The Bureau and Pine have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve these matters. A copy of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-555A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-555A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-555A1.txt
  • No. EB-07-SE-407 NAL/Acct. No. 200832100021 FRN # 0001650324 Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: March 12, 2008 Released: March 13, 2008 By the Deputy Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that SLO Cellular, Inc. d/b/a Cellular One of San Luis Obispo (``SLO Cellular'') apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Sections 20.19(c)(2)(i)(B)(1) and 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models that meet the radio frequency interference and inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by the applicable deadline. For SLO Cellular's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of forty-five thousand
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-589A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-589A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-589A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Section 68.4(a) of the Commission's Rules Governing Hearing Aid-Compatible Telephones Petitions of Alaska DigiTel, LLC, Edge Wireless Licenses, LLC, and NE Colorado Cellular, Inc. for Waiver of Section 20.19 of the Commission's Rules ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) WT Docket No. 01-309 Adopted: March 20, 2008 Released: March 20, 2008 By the Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau: Introduction In this Memorandum Opinion and Order, we address three waiver petitions filed by Tier III carriers in January and February, 2008, that request extensions of the September 18,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-603A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-603A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-603A1.txt
  • March 19, 2008 Released: March 20, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that South Slope Cooperative Telephone Company, d/b/a South Slope Wireless (``South Slope''), a Global System for Mobile Communications (``GSM'') Tier III carrier serving parts of Iowa, apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by September 18, 2006. For South Slope's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000). II. BACKGROUND In the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-610A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-610A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-610A1.txt
  • By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Iowa Wireless Services, LLC dba i wireless (``i wireless''), a Global System for Mobile Communications (``GSM'') carrier encompassing 37 associated Personal Communications Services (``PCS'') licensees providing service in Iowa and western Illinois, apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by September 18, 2006. For i wireless's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-two thousand five hundred dollars ($22,500). II. BACKGROUND
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-785A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-785A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-785A1.txt
  • Released: April 7, 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Cable & Communications Corporation dba Mid-Rivers Cellular (``Mid-Rivers Cellular''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') by the Bureau against Mid-Rivers Cellular for possible violation of Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') regarding its failure to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by September 18, 2006. The Bureau and Mid-Rivers Cellular have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-914A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-914A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-914A1.txt
  • No. EB-07-SE-270 Acct. No. 200832100046 FRN No. 0004119483 Adopted: May 7, 2008 Released: May 9, 2008 By the Deputy Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Edge Wireless Licenses, LLC (``Edge''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Edge for possible violations of section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") regarding the inductive coupling hearing aid compatibility requirements. The Bureau and Edge have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find that the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-920A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-920A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-920A1.txt
  • EB-07-SE-271 Acct. No. 200832100041 FRN No. 0001766179 Adopted: April 21, 2008 Released: April 23, 2008 By the Deputy Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Alaska DigiTel, LLC (``Alaska DigiTel''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Alaska DigiTel for possible violation of section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') regarding the inductive coupling hearing aid compatibility requirements. The Bureau and Alaska DigiTel have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1025A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1025A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1025A1.txt
  • No. 200932100055 FRN No. 0001704246 Adopted: May 11, 2009 Released: May 13, 2009 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Panhandle Telecommunication Systems, Inc. (``PTSI''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against PTSI for possible violation of former Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') regarding the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility. The Bureau and PTSI have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1044A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1044A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1044A1.txt
  • and Order, 35 FCC 2d 361 (1972). See Eure, 17 FCC Rcd at 21863-64; Triad Broadcasting Company, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 96 FCC 2d 1235, 1244 (1984). See Corr Wireless Communications, LLC, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 22 FCC Rcd 11567, 11570 (Enf. Bur. Spectrum Enf. Div., 2008) (finding that Corr apparently willfully and repeatedly violated former Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Rules by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by September 18, 2006), response pending. Although Section 504(c) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 504(c), prohibits us from relying on the issuance of a prior NAL that has not been paid or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1128A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1128A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1128A1.txt
  • of their obligation to report on the status of compliance with the Commission's hearing aid compatibility requirements. Manufacturers' status reports are due to be filed with the Commission by July 15, 2009. These reports are required of all manufacturers of devices that are within the scope of the rule, including manufacturers that fall within the de minimis exception, under Section 20.19(i) of the Commission's rules. Pursuant to the Commission's delegation of authority, the Bureau previously promulgated FCC Form 655 for filers' optional use in submitting their hearing aid compatibility status reports. Effective with the current filing period, the Bureau is introducing an electronic version of FCC Form 655 that will be filed online. Use of the electronic FCC Form 655 will
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1128A1_Rcd.pdf
  • (CMRS) of their obligation to report on the status of compliance with the Commission's hearing aid compatibility requirements.1Manufacturers' status reports are due to be filed with the Commission by July 15, 2009. These reports are required of all manufacturers of devices that are within the scope of the rule, including manufacturers that fall within the de minimis exception,2 under Section 20.19(i) of the Commission's rules.3 Pursuant to the Commission's delegation of authority, theBureau previously promulgated FCC Form 655 for filers' optional use in submitting their hearing aid compatibility status reports.4Effective with the current filing period, the Bureau is introducing an electronic version of FCC Form 655 that will be filed online. Use of the electronic FCC Form 655 will help filers
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1298A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1298A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1298A1.txt
  • Telecommunications Bureau (``Bureau'') announces that the new electronic FCC Form 655 has been approved by OMB (Control number 3060-0999) and is now mandatory and the only acceptable means by which reports on the status of compliance with the Commission's hearing aid compatibility requirements may be submitted. These reports must be filed annually by handset manufacturers and service providers under Section 20.19(i) of the Commission's rules. Beginning June 15, 2009, electronic FCC Form 655 will be accessible at http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac. A demonstration of the new form may be viewed at http://wireless.fcc.gov/presentations/form655-deployment-demo.html. Pursuant to the Commission's delegation of authority, the Bureau previously promulgated the FCC Form 655 for filers' optional use in submitting their hearing aid compatibility status reports. Effective with the current filing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1298A1_Rcd.pdf
  • Telecommunications Bureau ("Bureau") announces that the new electronic FCC Form 655 has been approved by OMB (Control number 3060-0999) and is now mandatory and the only acceptable means by which reports on the status of compliance with the Commission's hearing aid compatibility requirements may be submitted. These reports must be filed annually by handset manufacturers and service providers under Section 20.19(i) of the Commission's rules.1Beginning June 15, 2009, electronic FCC Form 655 will be accessible at http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac. A demonstration of the new form may be viewed at http://wireless.fcc.gov/presentations/form655-deployment-demo.html. Pursuant to the Commission's delegation of authority, the Bureau previously promulgated the FCC Form 655 for filers' optional use in submitting their hearing aid compatibility status reports.2Effective with the current filing period, the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1504A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1504A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1504A1.txt
  • Adopted: July 8, 2009 Released: July 10, 2009 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and CT Cube, Inc. d/b/a West Central Wireless (``CT Cube''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against CT Cube for possible violations of former section 20.19(c)(2)(i)(B)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') regarding the offering of digital wireless handset models that meet the radio frequency interference standard for hearing aid compatibility, and former section 20.19(f) of the Rules regarding the labeling requirements for digital wireless hearing aid-compatible handsets. The Bureau and CT Cube have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2473A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2473A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2473A1.txt
  • introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we propose a forfeiture of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000) against Smith Bagley, Inc., d/b/a Cellular One of NE Arizona (``SBI''), a Global System for Mobile Communications-based (``GSM-based'') Tier III carrier, serving parts of Arizona and New Mexico. As detailed herein, we find that SBI apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(c)(3) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), by failing to timely provide in its digital wireless handset offerings to consumers at least eight handset models that meet the radio frequency interference standards for hearing aid compatibility set forth in Section 20.19(b)(1), or in the alternative, ensure that at least 50% percent of the handset models that it offered to consumers complied with
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2476A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2476A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2476A1.txt
  • with the Commission's hearing aid compatibility requirements. Service providers' status reports are due to be filed with the Commission by January 15, 2010. These reports are required of all service providers that are within the scope of the rule, including resellers and holders of spectrum usage rights as well as providers that fall within the de minimis exception, under Section 20.19(i) of the Commission's rules. Pursuant to the Commission's delegation of authority, the Bureau in 2008 made FCC Form 655 available for service providers and device manufacturers to use in submitting hearing aid compatibility status reports. Beginning with the filing deadline for device manufacturers on July 15, 2009, the electronic FCC Form 655 became the only acceptable means by which reports
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2476A1_Rcd.pdf
  • of compliance with the Commission's hearing aid compatibility requirements.1Service providers' status reports are due to be filed with the Commission by January 15, 2010. These reports are required of all service providers that are within the scope of the rule, including resellers and holders of spectrum usage rights as well as providers that fall within the de minimis exception,2under Section 20.19(i) of the Commission's rules.3 Pursuant to the Commission's delegation of authority, the Bureau in 2008 made FCC Form 655 available for service providers and device manufacturers to use in submitting hearing aid compatibility status reports.4Beginning with the filing deadline for device manufacturers onJuly 15, 2009,5the electronic 1These requirements apply to providers of "digital CMRS in the United States to the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2507A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2507A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2507A1.txt
  • No. 201032100007 FRN 0005899216 Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: November 30, 2009 Released: December 2, 2009 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Apple, Inc. (``Apple'') apparently willfully violated the wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in Section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). For this apparent violation, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of five thousand dollars ($5,000). II. BACKGROUND In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of individuals with hearing disabilities to access digital wireless telecommunications. The Commission established technical standards that digital wireless handsets must meet
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-435A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-435A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-435A1.txt
  • February 24, 2009 Released: February 26, 2009 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Long Lines Wireless, LLC d/b/a Long Lines Wireless (``Long Lines''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation of Long Lines by the Bureau for possible violations of former Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') regarding the inductive coupling hearing aid compatibility requirements. The Bureau and Long Lines have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-556A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-556A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-556A1.txt
  • 9, 2009 Released: March 13, 2009 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and PinPoint Wireless, Inc. (``PinPoint''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') by the Bureau against PinPoint for possible violations of former Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') regarding the inductive coupling hearing aid compatibility requirements. The Bureau and PinPoint have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find that the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1223A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1223A2.txt
  • Band Manager Agreements 3060-1048 WTB-MD Section 1.929(c)(1) - Composite Interference Contour 3060-1110 WTB-MD Sunset of the Cellular Radiotelephone Service Analog Service Requirement and Related Matters, Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 07-103 3060-1124 WTB-MD Section 80.231, Technical Requirements for Class B Automatic Identification System (AIS) Equipment 3060-1136 WTB-MD Spectrum DashBoard Customer Feedback 3060-0645 WTB-SCPD Section 17.4, Antenna Registration 3060-0999 WTB-SCPD Section 20.19, Hearing-Aid Compatible Mobile Handsets (Hearing Aid Compatibility Act) 3060-1039 WTB-SCPD FCC 620 - FCC Wireless Telecommunications Bureau New Tower ("NT") Submission Packet: FCC 621 - FCC Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Collocation ("CO") Submission Packet 3060-1135 WTB-SCPD Revisions to Rules Authorizing the Operation of Low Power Auxiliary Stations (including Wireless Microphones) 3060-0132 WTB-SMRT Supplemental Information - 72-76 MHz Operational Fixed Stations 3060-0139
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1223A2_Rcd.pdf
  • Band Manager Agreements 3060-1048 WTB-MD Section 1.929(c)(1) - Composite Interference Contour 3060-1110 WTB-MD Sunset of the Cellular Radiotelephone Service Analog Service Requirement and Related Matters, Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 07-103 3060-1124 WTB-MD Section 80.231, Technical Requirements for Class B Automatic Identification System (AIS) Equipment 3060-1136 WTB-MD Spectrum DashBoard Customer Feedback 3060-0645 WTB-SCPD Section 17.4, Antenna Registration 3060-0999 WTB-SCPD Section 20.19, Hearing-Aid Compatible Mobile Handsets (Hearing Aid Compatibility Act) 8345 3060-0132 WTB-SMRT Supplemental Information - 72-76 MHz Operational Fixed Stations 3060-0139 WTB-SMRT Application for Antenna Structure Registration 3060-0795 WTB-SMRT Associate WTB and/or PSHSB Call Signs and Antenna Structure Registration Numbers with Licensee's FRN 3060-0798 WTB-SMRT FCC Application for Radio Service Authorization: WTB and PSHSB 3060-0799 WTB-SMRT FCC Ownership Disclosure Information for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1271A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1271A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1271A1.txt
  • Acct. No. 201032100035 FRN No. 0016162539 Adopted: July 9, 2010 Released: July 12, 2010 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Futurewei Technologies, Inc. d/b/a Huawei Technologies (USA) (``Huawei''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Huawei for possible violations of Section 20.19(i) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), regarding compliance with the Commission's regulations pertaining to hearing aid compatibility for wireless handsets. The Bureau and Huawei have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1321A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1321A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1321A1.txt
  • Date, and twenty-four (24) months after the Effective Date. Each Compliance Report shall include a certification by the Compliance Officer, as an agent of and on behalf of Qomo, stating that the Compliance Officer has personal knowledge that Qomo (i) has established operating procedures intended to ensure compliance with the terms and conditions of this Consent Decree and with section 20.19 of the Rules, together with an accompanying statement explaining the basis for the Compliance Officer's certification; (ii) has been utilizing those procedures since the previous Compliance Report was submitted; and (iii) is not aware of any instances of non-compliance. The certification must comply with section 1.16 of the Rules and be subscribed to as true under penalty of perjury in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1654A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1654A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1654A1.txt
  • the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we propose a forfeiture of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000) against Oklahoma Independent RSA 5 Partnership (``Oklahoma Independent''), a Global System for Mobile Communications-based (``GSM-based'') Tier III carrier, serving parts of Oklahoma. As detailed herein, we find that Oklahoma Independent apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(c)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''), by failing to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of digital wireless handsets that met or exceeded the radio frequency interference standards for hearing aid compatibility set forth in Section 20.19(b)(1). II. BACKGROUND In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of consumers with hearing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1657A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1657A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1657A1.txt
  • By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we propose a forfeiture of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000) against TX-10 Licensee, LLC dba Cellular One (``TX-10''), a Global System for Mobile Communications-based (``GSM-based'') Tier III carrier, serving parts of Texas. As detailed herein, we find that TX-10 apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(c)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''), by failing to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of digital wireless handsets that met or exceeded the radio frequency interference standards for hearing aid compatibility set forth in Section 20.19(b)(1). II. BACKGROUND In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of consumers with hearing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1659A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1659A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1659A1.txt
  • By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we propose a forfeiture of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000) against OK-5 Licensee Co., LLC (``OK-5 Licensee''), a Global System for Mobile Communications-based (``GSM-based'') Tier III carrier, serving parts of Oklahoma. As detailed herein, we find that OK-5 Licensee apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(c)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''), by failing to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of digital wireless handsets that met or exceeded the radio frequency interference standards for hearing aid compatibility set forth in Section 20.19(b)(1). II. BACKGROUND In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of consumers with hearing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1936A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1936A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1936A1.txt
  • the Commission's authority to revoke or limit such exemption if certain conditions are met. On August 5, 2010, the Commission released a Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking seeking comment on proposed revisions to the rules governing hearing aid compatibility of mobile handsets. Among other things, the Commission proposed to extend its rules beyond the current scope of 47 C.F.R. § 20.19(a) to include customer equipment used to provide wireless voice communications over any type of network among members of the public or a substantial portion of the public. The Commission sought comment on whether considerations of technological feasibility or marketability prevent application of these requirements to such customer equipment. We request that comments on the Further Notice address the effect of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1936A1_Rcd.pdf
  • the Commission's authority to revoke or limit such exemption if certain conditions are met.2 On August 5, 2010, the Commission released a Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking seeking comment on proposed revisions to the rules governing hearing aid compatibility of mobile handsets.3 Among other things, the Commission proposed to extend its rules beyond the current scope of 47 C.F.R. § 20.19(a) to include customer equipment used to provide wireless voice communications over any type of network among members ofthe public or a substantial portion of the public. The Commission sought comment on whether considerations of technological feasibility or marketability prevent application of these requirements to such customer equipment.4 1S. 3304, 111th Cong. sec. 102 (as signed by President, Oct. 8, 2010);
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2040A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2040A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2040A1.txt
  • liability for forfeiture Adopted: October 25, 2010 Released: October 26, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Total Call Mobile, Inc. (``TCM''), a reseller of mobile wireless services, apparently willfully violated the wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in Section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated the public web site posting requirements set forth in Section 20.19(h) of the Rules. For these apparent violations, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of twelve thousand dollars ($12,000). We also direct TCM to file the required wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report within thirty (30) days
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2041A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2041A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2041A1.txt
  • for forfeiture Adopted: October 25, 2010 Released: October 26, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that IDT Telecom, Inc. (``IDT Telecom''), a reseller of digital wireless services, apparently willfully violated the wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in Section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated the public web site posting requirements set forth in Section 20.19(h) of the Rules. For these apparent violations, we propose a total forfeiture in the amount of twelve thousand dollars ($12,000). We also direct IDT Telecom to file the required wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report within thirty
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2046A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2046A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2046A1.txt
  • 25, 2010 Released: October 26, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that MGA Entertainment, Inc. (``MGA''), a reseller of wireless services through its Bratz Mobile phone offering, apparently willfully violated the wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in Section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). For this apparent violation, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of six thousand dollars ($6,000). We also direct MGA to file the required wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report within thirty (30) days of the release of this NAL. II. BACKGROUND In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2049A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2049A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2049A1.txt
  • Adopted: October 26, 2010 Released: October 26, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Cbeyond Communications, LLC (``Cbeyond'') d/b/a Beyond Mobile, a reseller of mobile wireless services, apparently willfully violated the wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in Section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated the public web site posting requirements set forth in Section 20.19(h) of the Rules. For these apparent violations, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of twelve thousand dollars ($12,000). II. BACKGROUND In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2226A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2226A1.txt
  • liability for forfeiture Adopted: November 22, 2010 Released: November 22, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Lightyear Network Solutions, LLC (``Lightyear''), a reseller of mobile wireless services, apparently willfully violated the wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in Section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated the public web site posting requirements set forth in Section 20.19(h) of the Rules. For these apparent violations, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of twelve thousand dollars ($12,000). We also direct Lightyear to file the required wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report within thirty (30) days
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2250A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2250A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2250A1.txt
  • 2010 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we propose a forfeiture of forty-five thousand dollars ($45,000) against East Buchanan Telephone Cooperative (``East Buchanan''), a Global System for Mobile Communications-based (``GSM-based'') Tier III carrier serving parts of Iowa. As detailed herein, we find that East Buchanan apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 20.19(c)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''), by failing to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of digital wireless handsets that met or exceeded the radio frequency interference standards for hearing aid compatibility set forth in section 20.19(b)(1), and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Rules, by failing to offer to consumers the required number or percentage
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2353A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2353A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2353A1.txt
  • obligation to file hearing aid compatibility status reports, and announce certain revisions to electronic FCC Form 655 on which these status reports are filed. In addition, we clarify that each independently owned and operated service provider should file a separate status report. Collection 3060-0999 In the Hearing Aid Compatibility Second Report and Order, the Commission adopted several revisions to Section 20.19 of its rules governing wireless hearing aid compatibility. Some of these revisions required OMB approval before becoming effective. These rules revisions have now been approved by OMB and become effective on the dates indicated below: Effective December 14, 2010: In connection with modifying the de minimis exception so that companies that are not small entities are required to offer at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2353A1_Rcd.pdf
  • upcoming obligation to file hearing aid compatibility status reports, and announce certain revisions to electronic FCC Form 655 on which these status reports are filed. In addition, we clarify that each independently owned and operated service provider should file a separate status report. Collection 3060-0999 In the Hearing Aid Compatibility Second Report and Order,1the Commission adopted several revisions to Section 20.19 of its rules governing wireless hearing aid compatibility. Some of these revisions required OMB approval before becoming effective. These rules revisions have now been approved by OMB and become effective on the dates indicated below: Effective December 14, 2010: In connection with modifying the de minimisexception so that companies that are not small entities are required to offer at least
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2378A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2378A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2378A1.txt
  • File No. EB-10-SE-016 Acct. No. 201132100015 FRN No. 0019130319 Adopted: December 23, 2010 Released: December 27, 2010 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Maximum Communications Cellular, LLC ("MaxCell"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against MaxCell for possible violations of Section 20.19(c)(3)(ii) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") regarding the commercial availability of digital wireless handset models meeting the radio frequency standard for hearing aid compatibility, and for possible violations of Section 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Rules regarding the commercial availability of digital wireless handset models meeting the inductive coupling standard for hearing aid compatibility. The Bureau and MaxCell have negotiated the terms of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2388A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2388A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2388A1.txt
  • Service mail (according to the procedures set forth above for paper filings), to the Commission's duplicating contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., at FCC@BCPIWEB.COM or (202) 488-5563 (facsimile). . or call the FCC's Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice), (202) 418-0432 (TTY). . -FCC- For more news and information about the Federal Communications Commission 47 C.F.R. § 20.19. Amendment of the Comm'n's Rules Governing Hearing Aid-Compatible Mobile Handsets, WT Docket No. 07-250, First Report and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 3406, 3451 ¶ 117 (2008) (Hearing Aid Compatibility First Report and Order). Amendment of the Comm'n's Rules Governing Hearing Aid-Compatible Mobile Handsets, WT Docket No. 07-250, Policy Statement and Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2388A1_Rcd.pdf
  • to ensure that persons with hearing loss will continue to have broad access to evolvingmodes of wireless communication, consistent with the three principles the Commission has set forth to guide its hearing aid compatibility policies:4 Ensuring that developers of new technologies consider and plan for hearing aid compatibility at the earliest stages of the product design process; 147 C.F.R. § 20.19. 2Amendment of the Comm'n's Rules Governing Hearing Aid-Compatible Mobile Handsets,WT Docket No. 07- 250, First Report and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 3406, 3451 ¶ 117 (2008) (Hearing Aid Compatibility First Report and Order). 3Amendment of the Comm'n's Rules Governing Hearing Aid-Compatible Mobile Handsets, WT Docket No. 07- 250, Policy Statement and Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2428A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2428A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2428A1.txt
  • December 30, 2010 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we propose a forfeiture of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000) against Sandhill Communications (``Sandhill''), a Global System for Mobile Communications-based (``GSM-based'') Tier III carrier, serving parts of South Carolina. As detailed herein, we find that Sandhill apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 20.19(c)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''), by failing to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of digital wireless handsets that met or exceeded the radio frequency interference standards for hearing aid compatibility set forth in section 20.19(b)(1) of the Rules. BACKGROUND In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of consumers
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2435A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2435A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2435A1.txt
  • Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that the Champaign Telephone Company d/b/a CT Communications, Inc., a reseller of mobile wireless services through its operating division, CT Wireless (collectively, ``CT Communications''), apparently willfully violated the wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). For this apparent violation, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of six thousand dollars ($6,000). We also direct CT Communications to file the required wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report within thirty (30) days after the release of this NAL. II. BACKGROUND 2. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2436A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2436A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2436A1.txt
  • the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we propose a forfeiture of thirty-nine thousand dollars ($39,000) against Indigo Wireless, Inc. (``Indigo Wireless''), a Global System for Mobile Communications-based (``GSM-based'') Tier III carrier serving parts of New York and Pennsylvania. As detailed herein, we find that Indigo Wireless apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 20.19(c)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''), by failing to offer to consumers for nine months the required number or percentage of digital wireless handsets that met or exceeded the radio frequency interference standards for hearing aid compatibility set forth in section 20.19(b)(1) of the Rules. BACKGROUND In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2439A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2439A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2439A1.txt
  • No. 201132100019 FRN 0016004731 Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: December 30, 2010 Released: December 30, 2010 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that STi Prepaid, LLC, a reseller of wireless services through its operating division, STi Mobile (collectively, ``STi Prepaid''), apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 20.19(e)(2) of the Commission's rules (``Rules'') by failing for 18 months to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least one handset model that meets the inductive coupling standard for hearing aid compatibility set forth in section 20.19(b)(2) of the Rules. Further, we find that STi Prepaid apparently willfully violated the hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2440A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2440A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2440A1.txt
  • Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we propose a forfeiture of nineteen thousand five hundred dollars ($19,500) against Epic Touch Co., Inc. (``Epic Touch''), a Global System for Mobile Communications-based (``GSM-based'') Tier III carrier, serving parts of Kansas and Oklahoma. As detailed herein, we find that Epic Touch apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 20.19(c)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''), by failing to offer to consumers for nine months the required number or percentage of digital wireless handsets that met or exceeded the radio frequency interference standards for hearing aid compatibility set forth in section 20.19(b)(1) of the Rules. II. BACKGROUND In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-77A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-77A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-77A1.txt
  • Liability for forfeiture Adopted: January 14, 2010 Released: January 14, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that ACS Wireless, Inc. (``ACSW''), a subsidiary of Alaska Communications Systems, apparently willfully violated the wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in Section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated the public web site posting requirements set forth in Section 20.19(h) of the Rules. For these apparent violations, we propose a total forfeiture in the amount of twelve thousand dollars ($12,000). II. BACKGROUND In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-78A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-78A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-78A1.txt
  • FRN 0018191189 Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: January 14, 2010 Released: January 14, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Doro AB (``Doro'') apparently willfully and repeatedly violated the wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in Section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). For this apparent violation, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of twelve thousand dollars ($12,000). II. BACKGROUND In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of individuals with hearing disabilities to access digital wireless telecommunications. The Commission established technical standards that digital wireless handsets must meet
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-79A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-79A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-79A1.txt
  • of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: January 14, 2010 Released: January 14, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that East Kentucky Network, LLC d/b/a Appalachian Wireless (``East Kentucky Network'') apparently willfully violated the hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in Section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). For this apparent violation, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of five thousand dollars ($5,000). II. BACKGROUND In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of individuals with hearing disabilities to access digital wireless telecommunications. The Commission established technical standards that digital wireless handsets must meet
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-80A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-80A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-80A1.txt
  • FRN 0009043175 Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: January 14, 2010 Released: January 14, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that ZTE Corporation (``ZTE'') apparently willfully and repeatedly violated the wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in Section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and the public web site posting requirements set forth in Section 20.19(h) of the Rules. For these apparent violations, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of eighteen thousand dollars ($18,000). II. BACKGROUND In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of individuals with hearing disabilities to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-81A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-81A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-81A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-09-SE-151 NAL/Acct. No. 201032100013 FRN 0009221672 Notice OF apparent liability for forfeiture Adopted: January 14, 2010 Released: January 14, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that TCT Mobile Limited (``TCT Mobile'') apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), which requires the filing of status reports regarding the hearing aid compatibility of wireless handsets. We also find that TCT Mobile apparently willfully violated a Commission order by failing to respond to a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') from the Enforcement Bureau. Based on our review of facts and circumstances in this matter, we conclude that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-82A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-82A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-82A1.txt
  • Suite 401 Miami Beach, FL 33139 Re: File No. EB-09-SE-154 Dear Mr. Barutcu: This is an official CITATION, issued to Firefly Mobile Communications, Inc. (``Firefly''), a reseller of wireless services, pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for violating the digital wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject Firefly to monetary forfeitures. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of individuals with hearing disabilities to access digital wireless telecommunications. The Commission established technical standards that digital wireless handsets must meet
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-83A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-83A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-83A1.txt
  • Liability for forfeiture Adopted: January 14, 2010 Released: January 14, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Locus Telecommunications, Inc. (``Locus''), a reseller of digital wireless services, apparently willfully violated the wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in Section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated the public web site posting requirements set forth in Section 20.19(h) of the Rules. For these apparent violations, we propose a total forfeiture in the amount of twelve thousand dollars ($12,000). II. BACKGROUND In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-84A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-84A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-84A1.txt
  • 0012262259 Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: January 14, 2010 Released: January 14, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Airo Wireless, Inc. (``Airo'') apparently willfully and repeatedly violated the wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in Section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). For this apparent violation, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of twelve thousand dollars ($12,000). II. BACKGROUND In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of individuals with hearing disabilities to access digital wireless telecommunications. The Commission established technical standards that digital wireless handsets must meet
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-85A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-85A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-85A1.txt
  • Support Center, One Arts Plaza 1722 Routh Street, Suite 1000 Dallas, Texas 75201-2506 Re: File No. EB-09-SE-167 Dear Mr. Hennen: This is an official CITATION, issued to 7-Eleven, Inc. (``7-Eleven'') pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for violating the digital wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), and the public web site posting requirements set forth in section 20.19(h) of the Rules. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject 7-Eleven to monetary forfeitures. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of individuals with hearing disabilities to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-930A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-930A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-930A1.txt
  • Road Suite 300 Portland, Oregon 97224-7574 Re: File No. EB-09-SE-175 Dear Mr. Marick: This is an official CITATION, issued to Consumer Cellular, Inc. (``Consumer Cellular''), a reseller of wireless services, pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for violating the digital wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject Consumer Cellular to monetary forfeitures. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of individuals with hearing disabilities to access digital wireless telecommunications. The Commission established technical standards that digital wireless handsets must
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-931A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-931A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-931A1.txt
  • Road Bloomfield Hills, Michigan 48302-0336 Re: File No. EB-09-SE-168 Dear Mr. Bahri: This is an official CITATION issued to Air Voice Wireless, LLC (``Air Voice''), a reseller of wireless services, pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for violating the digital wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), and the public web site posting requirements set forth in section 20.19(h) of the Rules. We also find that Air Voice violated a Commission order by failing to respond to a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') from the Enforcement Bureau. As explained below, continued violations of the Commission's rules and the Act in this regard will
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-932A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-932A1.txt
  • Owner eCallPlus 1523 N. Oakmont Drive Vernon Hills, Illinois 60061 Re: File No. EB-09-SE-173 Dear Ms. Kang: This is an official CITATION, issued to eCallPlus, a reseller of wireless services, pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for violating the digital wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject eCall to monetary forfeitures. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of individuals with hearing disabilities to access digital wireless telecommunications. The Commission established technical standards that digital wireless handsets must meet
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-933A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-933A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-933A1.txt
  • Box 52085 Phoenix, Arizona 85072-2085 Re: File No. EB-09-SE-174 Dear Mr. O'Toole: This is an official CITATION issued to Circle K Stores, Inc. (``Circle K''), a reseller of wireless services, pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for violating the digital wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject Circle K to monetary forfeitures. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of individuals with hearing disabilities to access digital wireless telecommunications. The Commission established technical standards that digital wireless handsets must
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-934A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-934A1.txt
  • Parklawn Drive, Suite U Rockville MD 20852 Re: File No. EB-09-SE-182 Dear Sir or Madam: This is an official CITATION issued to Movida Cellular (``Movida''), a reseller of wireless services, pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for violating the digital wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's rules (``rules''), and the public web site posting requirements set forth in section 20.19(h) of the rules. We also find that Movida violated a Commission order by failing to respond to an Enforcement Bureau Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') directing Movida to provide certain information and documents concerning its compliance with the digital wireless handset hearing aid compatibility
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-935A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-935A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-935A1.txt
  • Dr. #310 San Diego, CA 92130-2004 Re: File No. EB-09-SE-177 Dear Ms. Herrick: This is an official CITATION issued to GreatCall, Inc., d/b/a Jitterbug (``Jitterbug''), a reseller of wireless services, pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for violating the digital wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject Jitterbug to monetary forfeitures. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of individuals with hearing disabilities to access digital wireless telecommunications. The Commission established technical standards that digital wireless handsets must meet
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-937A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-937A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-937A1.txt
  • Parklawn Drive, Suite U Rockville MD 20852 Re: File No. EB-09-SE-179 Dear Sir or Madam: This is an official CITATION issued to Liberty Wireless (``Liberty''), a reseller of wireless services, pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for violating the digital wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's rules (``rules''), and the public web site posting requirements set forth in section 20.19(h) of the rules. We also find that Liberty violated a Commission order by failing to respond to an Enforcement Bureau Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') directing Liberty to provide certain information and documents concerning its compliance with the digital wireless handset hearing aid compatibility
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-938A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-938A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-938A1.txt
  • 8108 S. Roberts Road Justice, Illinois 60458 Re: File No. EB-09-SE-185 Dear Mr. Ahmad: This is an official CITATION, issued to PlatinumTel Communications, LLC (``PlatinumTel''), a reseller of wireless services, pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), for violating the digital wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), and the public web site posting requirements set forth in section 20.19(h) of the Rules. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject PlatinumTel to monetary forfeitures. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of individuals with hearing disabilities to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-93A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-93A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-93A1.txt
  • also contact the Enforcement Bureau on its TTY line at (202) 418-1148 for further information about this Enforcement Advisory, or the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau on its TTY line at (202) 418-7233 about the wireless hearing aid compatibility rules. Issued by: Chief, Enforcement Bureau -FCC- The full text of the hearing aid compatibility rules is set forth at 47 C.F.R. § 20.19. These rules include technical standards that digital wireless handsets must meet to be considered compatible with hearing aids operating in acoustic coupling and inductive coupling (telecoil) modes, and establish deadlines by which manufacturers and wireless service providers, including resellers and Mobile Virtual Network Operators, are required to offer specified numbers or percentages of handsets per air interface that comply with
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-991A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-991A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-991A1.txt
  • Moss Bluff in Calcasieu Parish. Cameron Telephone and Elizabeth serve approximately 8,490 access lines in their incumbent LEC territories. Cameron Communications is currently owned by the following U.S. citizens and a Louisiana trust: William L. Henning, Jr. (33.33 percent), John A. Henning, Sr. (33.33 percent), Thomas G. Henning (13.14 percent), and the Henning Retained Annuity Trust (Thomas G. Henning, Trustee, 20.19 percent). After the completion of the proposed transaction, Cameron Holdings, a North Carolina limited liability company, will own 100 percent of Cameron Communications. American Broadband Acquisition-V, LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company, owns 100 percent of Cameron Holdings, and is wholly owned by American Broadband, a Delaware limited liability company. Patrick L. Eudy, a U.S. citizen, owns 95.12 percent
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1002A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1002A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1002A1.txt
  • ) File No.: EB-07-SE-281 Acct. No.: 201132100031 FRN: 0003010493 ORDER Adopted: June 9, 2011 Released: June 9, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Cincinnati Bell Wireless LLC (``CBW''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Bureau regarding CBW's compliance with section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's rules pertaining to the deployment of digital wireless hearing aid-compatible handsets. The Bureau and CBW have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1122A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1122A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1122A1.txt
  • Amendment of the Commission's Rules Governing Hearing Aid-Compatible Mobile Handsets ) ) ) ) ) ) ) WT Docket No. 07-250 ORDER Adopted: June 29, 2011 Released: June 29, 2011 By the Deputy Chief, Spectrum and Competition Policy Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau: In this Order, we grant CTC Telcom d/b/a Mosaic Telecom (Mosaic) a temporary waiver of 47 C.F.R. §§ 20.19(c)(3) and 20.19(d)(3) for the period from September 1, 2009, through February 1, 2011. As applied to Mosaic, these provisions require that at least half of the handset models it offers meet hearing aid compatibility standards for acoustic coupling and one-third of its handset models meet hearing aid compatibility standards for inductive coupling, respectively. Mosaic contends that a waiver is merited
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1122A1_Rcd.pdf
  • Mosaic Telecom Petition for Temporary Waiver Amendment of the Commission's Rules Governing Hearing Aid-Compatible Mobile Handsets )))))))WT Docket No. 07-250 ORDER Adopted: June 29, 2011 Released: June 29, 2011 By the Deputy Chief, Spectrum and Competition Policy Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau: 1. In this Order, we grant CTC Telcom d/b/a Mosaic Telecom (Mosaic) a temporary waiver of 47 C.F.R. §§ 20.19(c)(3) and 20.19(d)(3) for the period from September 1, 2009, through February 1, 2011. As applied to Mosaic, these provisions require that at leasthalf of the handset models it offers meet hearing aid compatibility standards for acoustic coupling and one-third of its handset models meet hearing aid compatibility standards for inductive coupling, respectively. Mosaic contends that a waiver is merited because
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1641A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1641A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1641A1.txt
  • Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we propose a forfeiture of nineteen thousand five hundred dollars ($19,500) against Kaplan Telephone Company, Inc. d/b/a Pace Communications (``Pace''), a Global System for Mobile Communications-based (``GSM-based'') Tier III carrier, serving Vermilion Parish, Louisiana. As detailed herein, we find that Pace apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules (``Rules'') by failing to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of digital wireless handset models that met or exceeded the radio frequency interference standards for hearing aid compatibility set forth in section 20.19(b)(1) of the Rules, and that this apparent misconduct continued for seven consecutive months in 2010. II. BACKGROUND In the 2003 Hearing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1707A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1707A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1707A1.txt
  • to the Chief of WTB and the Chief of OET to initiate a rulemaking proceeding to adopt future versions of the ANSI Standard that add frequency bands or air interfaces not covered by previous versions, if the new version does not impose materially greater obligations than those imposed on services already subject to the hearing aid compatibility rules. Under Section 20.19(k)(1), new obligations imposed on manufacturers and Commercial Mobile Radio Service (CMRS) providers as a result of WTB's and OET's adoption of technical standards for additional frequency bands and air interfaces shall become effective no less than one year after release of the order for manufacturers and Tier I carriers and no less than 15 months after release for other service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1809A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1809A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1809A1.txt
  • Adopted: October 28, 2011 Released: October 28, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we propose a forfeiture in the amount of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) against Keystone Wireless, LLC d.b.a. Immix Wireless (``Keystone Wireless''). As detailed herein, we find that Keystone Wireless apparently willfully and repeatedly violated sections 20.19(c)(3)(ii) and 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''). We further find that some of the apparent misconduct continued for more than 11 of the 12 months in the reporting period. Specifically, Keystone Wireless apparently failed to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset models as set forth in the Rules. These hearing aid compatibility
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1812A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1812A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1812A1.txt
  • October 28, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we propose a forfeiture in the amount of eighty two thousand five hundred dollars ($82,500) against Missouri RSA 5 Partnership d/b/a Chariton Valley Wireless Services (``Chariton Valley''). As detailed herein, we find that Chariton Valley apparently willfully and repeatedly violated sections 20.19(c)(3)(ii) and 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''). We further find that some of the apparent misconduct continued for 10 of the 12 months in the 2010 reporting period. Specifically, Chariton Valley apparently failed to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset models as set forth in the Rules. The hearing aid compatibility requirements
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1844A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1844A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1844A1.txt
  • EB-10-SE-115 Acct. No.: 201232100003 FRN: 0004334538 ORDER Adopted: November 8, 2011 Released: November 9, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') of the Federal Communications Commission and OTZ Telecommunications, Inc. (``OTZ''). The Consent Decree resolves and terminates the Bureau's investigation into OTZ's compliance with section 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules concerning the deployment of digital wireless hearing aid-compatible handsets. These hearing aid compatibility requirements serve to ensure that consumers with hearing loss have access to advanced telecommunications services. The Bureau and OTZ have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1885A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1885A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1885A1.txt
  • Adopted: November 15, 2011 Released: November 15, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') of the Federal Communications Commission and Start Wireless Group, Inc., d/b/a Page Plus Cellular (``Page Plus''). The Consent Decree resolves and terminates the Bureau's investigation into Page Plus's compliance with section 20.19(f)(1) of the Commission's rules concerning the labeling and consumer disclosure requirements that apply to hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handsets. These hearing aid compatibility requirements serve to ensure that consumers with hearing loss have access to sufficient information to make an informed decision about which wireless telephone best meets their individual needs. The Bureau and Page Plus have negotiated the terms
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1973A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1973A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1973A1.txt
  • ORDER Adopted: December 14, 2011 Released: December 14, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') of the Federal Communications Commission and Cross Wireless, L.L.C. d/b/a Sprocket Wireless, L.L.C. (``Cross Wireless''). The Consent Decree resolves and terminates the Bureau's investigation into Cross Wireless's compliance with sections 20.19(c)(3)(ii) and 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules concerning the deployment of digital wireless hearing aid-compatible handsets. These hearing aid compatibility requirements serve to ensure that consumers with hearing loss have access to advanced telecommunications services. The Bureau and Cross Wireless have negotiated the Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2034A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2034A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2034A1.txt
  • Adopted: December 23, 2011 Released: December 23, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we propose a forfeiture in the amount of thirty-nine thousand dollars ($39,000) against North Central Wireless LC d/b/a i wireless (``North Central''). As detailed herein, we find that North Central apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''). We further find that the apparent misconduct continued for seven consecutive months during the 2010 reporting period. Specifically, North Central apparently failed to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset models as set forth in the Rules. These hearing aid compatibility requirements serve to ensure that consumers with
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2035A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2035A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2035A1.txt
  • Liability for forfeiture Adopted: December 23, 2011 Released: December 23, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we propose a forfeiture in the amount of thirty thousand dollars ($30,000) against Affordable Phone Services, Inc. (``Affordable Phone''). As detailed herein, we find that Affordable Phone apparently willfully and repeatedly violated sections 20.19(c)(3)(ii) and 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''). Specifically, Affordable Phone apparently failed to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset models as set forth in the Rules. These hearing aid compatibility requirements serve to ensure that consumers with hearing loss have access to advanced telecommunications services. II. BACKGROUND In the 2003 Hearing Aid
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2042A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2042A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2042A1.txt
  • 23, 2011 Released: December 23, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Admonishment (``NAL''), we propose a forfeiture in the amount of thirty thousand dollars ($30,000) and issue an admonishment against Airadigm Communications, Inc. dba Airfire Wireless (``Airadigm''). As detailed herein, we find that Airadigm apparently willfully and repeatedly violated sections 20.19(c)(3)(ii) and 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''). Specifically, Airadigm apparently failed to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset models as set forth in the Rules. These hearing aid compatibility requirements serve to ensure that consumers with hearing loss have access to advanced telecommunications services. BACKGROUND In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2060A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2060A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2060A1.txt
  • forfeiture Adopted: December 23, 2011 Released: December 23, 2011 By the Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we propose a forfeiture in the amount of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000) against Caprock Cellular Limited Partnership (``Caprock''). As detailed herein, we find that Caprock apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 20.19(c)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''). Specifically, Caprock apparently failed to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset models as set forth in the Rules. These hearing aid compatibility requirements serve to ensure that consumers with hearing loss have access to advanced telecommunications services. II. BACKGROUND In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2061A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2061A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2061A1.txt
  • Released: December 23, 2011 By the Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we propose a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-one thousand dollars ($21,000) against iSmart Mobile, LLC d/b/a Big Sky Mobile (``Big Sky''). As detailed herein, we find that Big Sky apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 20.19(c)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''). We further find that the apparent misconduct continued for the entire 2010 calendar year. Specifically, Big Sky apparently failed to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset models as set forth in the Rules. These hearing aid compatibility requirements serve to ensure that consumers with hearing loss have
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2075A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2075A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2075A1.txt
  • Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: December 28, 2011 Released: December 28, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we propose a forfeiture in the amount of fifty-one thousand dollars ($51,000) against General Communication, Inc. (``GCI''). As detailed herein, we find that GCI apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''). We further find that this apparent misconduct continued for seven consecutive months during the 2010 calendar year. Specifically, GCI apparently failed to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset models that operate on the GSM air interface as set forth in the Rules. These hearing aid compatibility requirements
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2076A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2076A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2076A1.txt
  • Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: December 28, 2011 Released: December 29, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we propose a forfeiture in the amount of seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000) against Centennial Communications Corporation (``Centennial''). As detailed herein, we find that Centennial apparently willfully and repeatedly violated sections 20.19(d)(3)(ii) and 20.19(e)(2) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''). Specifically, Centennial apparently failed to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset models that operate on the GSM and WCDMA air interfaces as set forth in the Rules. These hearing aid compatibility requirements serve to ensure that consumers with hearing loss have access to advanced telecommunications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2077A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2077A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2077A1.txt
  • Liability for forfeiture Adopted: December 29, 2011 Released: December 29, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we propose a forfeiture in the amount of forty-eight thousand dollars ($48,000) against Metropolitan Telecommunications Holding Company d.b.a. MetTel (``Metropolitan''). As detailed herein, we find that Metropolitan apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''). We further find that this apparent misconduct continued for the entire 2010 calendar year. Specifically, Metropolitan apparently failed to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset models that operate on the WCDMA and GSM air interfaces as set forth in the Rules. These hearing aid compatibility requirements serve
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2078A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2078A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2078A1.txt
  • December 28, 2011 Released: December 29, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Admonishment, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand five hundred dollars ($25,500) and issue an admonishment against Locus Telecommunications, Inc. (``Locus''). As detailed herein, we find that Locus apparently willfully and repeatedly violated sections 20.19(c)(3)(ii) and 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''). We further find that some of this apparent misconduct continued for the entire 2010 calendar year. Specifically, Locus apparently failed to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset models that operate on the GSM air interface as set forth in the Rules. These hearing aid compatibility
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2079A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2079A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2079A1.txt
  • apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: December 28, 2011 Released: December 28, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we propose a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand five hundred dollars ($25,500) against NEP Cellcorp, Inc. (``NEP''). As detailed herein, we find that NEP apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 20.19(c)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''). We further find that this apparent misconduct continued for five consecutive months during the 2010 calendar year. Specifically, NEP apparently failed to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset models as set forth in the Rules. These hearing aid compatibility requirements serve to ensure that consumers with hearing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2080A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2080A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2080A1.txt
  • of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: December 28, 2011 Released: December 28, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we propose a forfeiture in the amount of thirty thousand dollars ($30,000) against Maximum Communications Cellular, LLC (``MaxCell''). As detailed herein, we find that MaxCell apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 20.19(c)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules (``Rules''). Specifically, MaxCell apparently failed to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset models that operate on the GSM and WCDMA air interfaces as set forth in the Rules. These hearing aid compatibility requirements serve to ensure that consumers with hearing loss have access to advanced telecommunications services. II.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2097A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2097A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2097A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Certain Notices of Apparent Liability for ) Forfeiture and Citations Issued for ) Violations of 47 C.F.R. § 20.19(h) ) and 47 C.F.R. § 20.19(i) ) File No.: See Appendix NAL/Acct. No.: See Appendix FRN: See Appendix ORDER Adopted: December 30, 2011 Released: December 30, 2011 By the Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau 1. On December 13, 2011, the Commission published a notice in the Federal Register announcing the effectiveness, as of the date of the notice,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-257A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-257A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-257A1.txt
  • ORDER Adopted: February 17, 2011 Released: February 17, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Pantech Co., Ltd. and its wholly owned U.S.-based subsidiary, Pantech Wireless, Inc. (together ``Pantech''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Bureau regarding Pantech's compliance with sections 20.19(h) and (i) of the Commission's rules concerning the wireless handset hearing aid compatibility web site posting and hearing aid compatibility status reporting requirements, and sections 20.19(c)(1) and (d)(1) of the Commission's rules pertaining to the hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset deployment requirements. The Bureau and Pantech have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve this matter. A
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-3A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-3A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-3A1.txt
  • January 19, 2011 By the Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and ACS Wireless, Inc. (``ACSW''). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau and cancels the Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') issued against ACSW for possible violations of Sections 20.19 (h) and (i)(1) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''), regarding compliance with the Commission's regulations pertaining to hearing aid compatibility for wireless handsets. The Bureau and ACSW have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-441A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-441A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-441A1.txt
  • 1.102(b)(1), this order SHALL BE effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon E. Gillett Chief Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX Proposed Redefinition of Wabash Telephone Cooperative Wire Center CLLI Code Population Land Area (sq. miles) Density Bible Grove* BBGVILXE 968 69.46 13.94 Louisville* LSVLILXE 2303 82.04 28.07 Xenia* XENIILXE 1147 70.63 16.24 Browns BRNSILXE 945 58.51 16.15 Cisne CISNILXE 1976 97.88 20.19 Crisp CRSPILXE 532 50.1 10.62 Geff GEFFILXE 1211 72.02 16.81 Mount Erie MTERILXE 1097 140.22 7.82 Orchardville OCVLILXE 406 29.55 13.74 See Cellular Properties Petition for Commission Agreement in Redefining the Service Area of Wabash Telephone Cooperative, Inc. in the State of Illinois Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. Section 54.207(c), CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Mar. 20, 2009) (Cellular Properties Petition);
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-57A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-57A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-57A1.txt
  • each year. This year, however, that deadline falls on a weekend and is followed by a federal holiday, which moves the deadline to the next business day, January 18, 2011. See Hearing Aid Compatibility Status Reporting at http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac. Service providers offering two or fewer digital wireless handset models per air interface qualify for the de minimis exception (47 C.F.R. § 20.19(e)). Although these entities are exempt from most of the hearing aid compatibility deployment requirements in 47 C.F.R. § 20.19, they must still comply with the reporting requirement in 47 C.F.R. § 20.19(i). The Commission recently limited the de minimis exception so that it is unavailable to service providers that are not small entities after an initial two-year period. See Amendment
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-732A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-732A3.txt
  • for Fiscal Year for (a) percent of households with broadband, (b) gross domestic product total, and (c ) gross domestic product per capita. Data is for Calendar Year for (a) regional population densityand (b) regional tertiaryeducation. Data bycorrespondence with Japan Ministryof Internal Affairs and Communications. Total population data is from OECD. Federal Communications Commission DA 11-732 2006 2007 2008 2009 20.19 20.10 20.35 15.56 14.31 15.56 15.68 15.17 15.96 24.69 23.85 24.39 16.74 16.77 16.75 16.59 16.75 15.75 15.64 16.01 16.18 17.77 17.59 17.98 14.89 16.08 16.79 16.08 16.46 16.03 37.44 37.81 37.85 45.52 45.35 44.80 35.88 35.78 36.41 33.60 34.92 34.09 59.00 36.38 59.00 Tertiary Education (as % of labor force) Federal Communications Commission DA 11-732 46.50 53.00 47.68 58.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-802A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-802A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-802A1.txt
  • corrective measures are not sufficient to avoid enforcement action.''). Forfeiture Order, 2011 WL 742240, at *3, para. 8. See e.g., Champaign Tel. Co. D/B/A CT Commc'ns, Inc., Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 25 FCC Rcd 17814, 17818-19, para. 9 (Spec. Enf. Div. 2010) (construing a failure to file the hearing aid compatibility status report required under section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's rules as ``a continuing violation that continues until . . . cured''); STI Prepaid, 25 FCC Rcd at 17845, para. 20 (same); Lightyear Network Solutions, LLC, Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 25 FCC Rcd 16212, 16217, para. 12 (Spec. Enf. Div. 2010) (same); Alpheus Commc'ns, LP, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 25 FCC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-909A1.pdf
  • with the current rule will not be required to replace this with the newlyprescribed language. This disclosure rule will apply to all handsets that operate in part over an air interface or frequency band that is not covered by the current hearing aid compatibilitytechnical standard until the date that rules adopting any new standard become effective. 3. De minimisexception.1 1Section 20.19 provides a de minimis exception to hearing aid compatibility obligations for those manufacturers and mobile service providers that only offer a small number of handset models. Specifically, 47 C.F.R. § 20.19(e)(1) provides that manufacturers and mobile service providers offering two handset models or fewer in the United States 3 Although not impacting small entities, the Commission also refined the de
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-285A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-285A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-285A1.txt
  • 200832100016 FRN: 0005599634 ORDER Adopted: February 27, 2012 Released: February 27, 2012 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (Bureau) of the Federal Communications Commission and Epic Touch Co., Inc. (Epic Touch). The Consent Decree resolves and terminates the Bureau's investigation into Epic Touch's compliance with Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's rules (Rules) concerning the deployment of digital wireless hearing aid-compatible handsets. The hearing aid compatibility requirements serve to ensure that consumers with hearing loss have access to advanced telecommunications services. The Bureau and Epic Touch have negotiated the Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-550A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-550A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-550A1.txt
  • authority to the Chief of WTB and the Chief of OET to conduct rulemaking proceedings to adopt future versions of the ANSI Standard that add frequency bands or air interfaces not covered by previous versions, if the new version does not impose materially greater obligations than those imposed on services already subject to the hearing aid compatibility rules. Under Section 20.19(k)(1), WTB and OET shall set an effective date for new obligations imposed on manufacturers and Commercial Mobile Radio Service (CMRS) providers as a result of their adoption of technical standards for additional frequency bands and air interfaces that is no less than one year after release of the order for manufacturers and Tier I carriers and no less than 15
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-550A1_Rcd.pdf
  • aid- compatible for inductive coupling if it meets a rating of at least T3.5The 2007 ANSI Standard specifies testing procedures for determining the M-rating and T-rating of digital wireless handsets that operate over the air interfaces that, at the time it was promulgated, were commonly used for wireless services in the 800-950 MHz and 1.6-2.5 GHz bands. 147 C.F.R. § 20.19(c), (d). Hearing aids operating in acoustic coupling mode receive through a microphone and then amplify all sounds surrounding the user, including both desired sounds, such as a telephone's audio signal, and unwanted ambient noise. Hearing aids operating in inductive coupling mode turn off their microphone to avoid amplifying unwanted ambient noise, instead using atelecoil to receive only audio signal-based magnetic
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-628A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-628A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-628A1.txt
  • Acct. No.: 20123210023 FRN: 0010723591 ORDER Adopted: May 11, 2012 Released: May 11, 2012 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (Bureau) of the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) and Ztar Mobile, Inc. (Ztar). The Consent Decree resolves and terminates the Bureau's investigations into Ztar's compliance with Section 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules (Rules) concerning the deployment of digital wireless hearing aid-compatible handsets and with Section 222 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the Act), Section 64.2009(e) of the Rules, and the EPIC CPNI Order, concerning the filing of an annual Customer Proprietary Network Information certification. The Bureau and Ztar have negotiated the Consent Decree that resolves
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238419A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238419A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238419A1.txt
  • 310, and 610, the rule changes specified in Appendix C are adopted. In Paragraph 15 of Appendix B, the Final Regulatory Flexibility Act, the sentence is revised to read as follows: "Pursuant to 5 U.S.C § 553(d), [footnote omitted] the rules adopted herein shall take effect sixty (60) days after publication in the Federal Register.'' Appendix C, Amendments to Section 20.19(e), are revised to read as follows: (e) De minimis exception. (1) Manufacturers or mobile service providers that offer two or fewer digital wireless handsets in the U.S. are exempt from the requirements of this section. For mobile service providers that obtain handsets only from manufacturers that offer two or fewer digital wireless phone models in the U.S., the service provider
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260920A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260920A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260920A1.txt
  • Copps. For additional information, contact Angela Giancarlo at (202) 418-0680 or Angela.Giancarlo@fcc.gov, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau. WT Docket No. 01-309 - FCC - News and other information about the Federal Communications Commission is available at www.fcc.gov. STATEMENT OF COMMISSIONER MICHAEL J. COPPS RE: Section 68.4(a) of the Commission's Rules Governing Hearing Aid-Compatible Telephones; Cingular Wireless LLC Petition for Waiver of Section 20.19(c)(3)(i)(A) of the Commission's Rules, Memorandum Opinion and Order (WT Docket No. 01-309). Today's Order grants Cingular Wireless a limited waiver of our hearing aid compatibility rules as they apply to wireless phones. It is with some hesitation that I support this action. I have said before that strong and clear rules are critical to accomplishing the statutory goal of ensuring
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • ASSOC. INC.- KS 9.27 -1.69 11.15 11.33 411791 A LA HARPE TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. 13.66 6.55 6.67 21.35 411801 C MADISON TELEPHONE, LLC 6.55 -4.10 11.11 9.00 411807 C MOKAN DIAL, INC.- KS 2.70 2.09 0.60 -0.69 411808 C MOUNDRIDGE TEL. CO. -1.56 -3.53 2.04 -2.78 411809 C MUTUAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.82 1.39 4.36 5.85 411814 C PEOPLES TELECOMMUNICATIONS, LLC 20.19 -3.81 24.95 30.10 411817 C PIONEER TELEPHONE ASSOCIATION INC. 1.00 0.21 0.79 -2.60 411818 C CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC- KS 10.20 -2.30 12.80 28.26 411820 C RAINBOW TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOC., INC. 1.77 -2.18 4.04 1.70 411826 C RURAL TEL. SERVICE CO.,INC. 26.27 -7.00 35.77 40.89 411827 C S & T TEL. COOP. ASSN. 19.97 -9.10 31.97 26.77 411829 C S &
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • ASSOC. INC.- KS 9.27 -1.69 11.15 11.33 411791 A LA HARPE TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. 13.66 6.55 6.67 21.35 411801 C MADISON TELEPHONE, LLC 6.55 -4.10 11.11 9.00 411807 C MOKAN DIAL, INC.- KS 2.70 2.09 0.60 -0.69 411808 C MOUNDRIDGE TEL. CO. -1.56 -3.53 2.04 -2.78 411809 C MUTUAL TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.82 1.39 4.36 5.85 411814 C PEOPLES TELECOMMUNICATIONS, LLC 20.19 -3.81 24.95 30.10 411817 C PIONEER TELEPHONE ASSOCIATION INC. 1.00 0.21 0.79 -2.60 411818 C CRAW-KAN TELEPHONE COOP INC- KS 10.20 -2.30 12.80 28.26 411820 C RAINBOW TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOC., INC. 1.77 -2.18 4.04 1.70 411826 C RURAL TEL. SERVICE CO.,INC. 26.27 -7.00 35.77 40.89 411827 C S & T TEL. COOP. ASSN. 19.97 -9.10 31.97 26.77 411829 C S &
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 20.63 21.29 21.29 21.34 21.88 22.98 24.22 25.11 26.25 25.91 25.45 Georgia Atlanta 24.50 24.53 24.80 24.98 24.98 24.92 24.92 26.04 27.25 28.56 29.54 28.90 28.90 Hawaii Honolulu 19.35 20.60 21.35 22.52 22.40 22.40 22.40 23.28 23.28 25.34 26.35 26.27 26.13 Illinois Chicago 18.21 18.20 17.31 17.63 17.18 17.18 14.52 15.52 21.64 24.68 22.12 21.19 21.27 Illinois Decatur 21.56 21.54 20.19 20.18 20.18 20.18 22.26 23.26 21.08 31.52 29.15 28.44 28.53 Illinois Rock Island 22.18 22.17 20.82 20.82 20.18 20.18 21.85 22.85 20.79 31.26 28.90 28.19 28.28 Indiana Indianapolis 21.87 20.44 19.81 18.82 18.82 18.82 19.05 20.25 20.40 20.20 20.21 19.74 19.79 Indiana Terre Haute 22.93 23.02 23.02 22.98 22.98 22.98 19.86 22.57 23.63 26.21 25.94 25.95 25.77 Iowa Fort Dodge
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • Verizon Southwest - Contel Texas TX 3,011 2,274 6,537 217.10 Verizon Southwest - Texas TX 44,604 33,919 104,491 234.26 AT&T - Southwestern Bell - Texas TX (803,166) (852,028) 44,062 (5.49) Sprint - United Telephone Company of Texas TX 3,631 2,759 4,588 126.36 Valor Telecommunications of Texas - Texas TX (126,104) (127,582) 2,994 (2.37) Qwest - Utah UT 83,057 80,005 16,767 20.19 Verizon New England - Vermont VT (108,487) (110,606) 678 (0.62) Sprint - Central Telephone Company of Virginia VA 3,562 2,757 191 5.36 Verizon South - Contel/Virginia VA 3,349 2,486 15,523 463.51 Verizon Virginia VA (166,690) (191,641) 93,340 (56.00) Verizon South - Virginia VA 1,188 1,175 1,531 128.87 Sprint - United Telephone Co. - Southeast - Virginia VA 1,750 1,320 1,646
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A13.txt
  • Verizon Southwest - Contel Texas TX 3,011 2,274 6,537 217.10 Verizon Southwest - Texas TX 44,604 33,919 104,491 234.26 AT&T - Southwestern Bell - Texas TX (803,166) (852,028) 44,062 (5.49) Sprint - United Telephone Company of Texas TX 3,631 2,759 4,588 126.36 Valor Telecommunications of Texas - Texas TX (126,104) (127,582) 2,994 (2.37) Qwest - Utah UT 83,057 80,005 16,767 20.19 Verizon New England - Vermont VT (108,487) (110,606) 678 (0.62) Sprint - Central Telephone Company of Virginia VA 3,562 2,757 191 5.36 Verizon South - Contel/Virginia VA 3,349 2,486 15,523 463.51 Verizon Virginia VA (166,690) (191,641) 93,340 (56.00) Verizon South - Virginia VA 1,188 1,175 1,531 128.87 Sprint - United Telephone Co. - Southeast - Virginia VA 1,750 1,320 1,646
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-273225A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-273225A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-273225A1.txt
  • in the Federal Register. See Section 1.4(b) (1) of the Commission's rules (47 CFR 1.4(b) (1)). Replies to an opposition must be filed within 10 days after the time for filing oppositions has expired. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------- Subject: In the Matter of Section 68.4(a) of the Commission's Rules Governing Hearing Aid-Compatible Telephones (WT Docket No. 01-309) Petitions for Waiver of Section 20.19 of the Commission's Rules Filed By: -Kelly Ramsey, on behalf of Cellular Phone of Kentucky, Inc., and Litchfield County Cellular, Inc., d/b/a Ramcell of Kentucky, 05/11/07* -Harold Mordkofsky, for Blooston Mordkofsky Dickens Duffy & Prendergast LLP, on behalf of South Central Utah Telephone Association, Inc., 05/11/07 -Robert M. Jackson, for Blooston Mordkofsky Dickens Duffy & Prendergast LLP, on behalf of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278397A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278397A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278397A1.txt
  • as indicated below: 1. The final sentence of footnote 52 is amended to read as follows: WiMAX (Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access) is a wireless technology that is based on the IEEE 802.16 standards. 2. Footnote 107 is amended to read as follows: See Section 68.4 (a) of the Commission's Rules Governing Hearing Aid-Compatible Telephones, Petitions for Waiver of Section 20.19 of the Commission's Rules, WT Docket No. 01-309, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 7171 (2007) (resolving 19 requests for waiver of the September 18, 2005 acoustic coupling compatibility deployment deadline). FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Fred B. Campbell, Jr. Chief Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Federal Communications Commission DA 07-XXX Federal Communications Commission C $ A B C D t w $C
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • 26.25 25.91 25.45 25.30 25.43 Georgia Atlanta 24.50 24.53 24.80 24.98 24.98 24.92 24.92 26.04 27.25 28.56 29.54 28.90 29.85 29.06 28.26 Hawaii Honolulu 19.35 20.60 21.35 22.52 22.40 22.40 22.40 23.28 23.28 25.34 26.35 26.27 26.13 26.34 26.50 Illinois Chicago 18.21 18.20 17.31 17.63 17.18 17.18 14.52 15.52 21.64 24.68 22.12 21.19 21.27 21.27 18.88 Illinois Decatur 21.56 21.54 20.19 20.18 20.18 20.18 22.26 23.26 21.08 31.52 29.15 28.44 28.53 28.99 25.98 Illinois Rock Island 22.18 22.17 20.82 20.82 20.18 20.18 21.85 22.85 20.79 31.26 28.90 28.19 28.28 28.74 25.38 Indiana Indianapolis 21.87 20.44 19.81 18.82 18.82 18.82 19.05 20.25 20.40 20.20 20.21 19.74 19.79 20.25 19.85 Indiana Terre Haute 22.93 23.02 23.02 22.98 22.98 22.98 19.86 22.57 23.63 26.21
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297713A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297713A1.txt
  • National Council on Disability, The Need for Federal Legislation and Regulation Prohibiting Telecommunica- tions and Information Services Discrimination, Dec. 19, 2006, http://www.ncd.gov/newsroom/publica- tions/2006/discrimination.htm#conclusion 99 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101-336, 104 Stat. 327 (1990) (codified at 47 U.S.C. §225) ("ADA Title IV"). 100 See 47 C.F.R. § 6.1 et seq. 101 See 47 C.F.R. § 20.19. 102 Workforce Investment Act of 1998, Pub. L. No. 105-220, 112 Stat 936 (1998) (codified at 29 U.S.C. § 794d) ("WIA Section 508"). 103 Under Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act, federal agencies must "develop, procure, maintain, and use" electronic and information technologies that are acces- sible to people with disabilities ­ unless doing so would cause an "undue burden."
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
  • Monitoring Report at http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/iatd/monitor.html. Source: Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC). Table 2.11 Link Up Assistance Annual Payments by State or Jurisdictio n 2 - 52 State or Jurisdiction Non- Non- Non- General Tribal General Tribal General Tribal Tribal Tribal Tribal Tribal Tribal Tribal Alabama $9.73 $6.30 $9.09 $8.31 $7.94 $8.27 $25.70 - $26.75 - $29.76 - Alaska 10.32 18.66 10.45 20.19 8.92 17.98 25.17 18.39 - 18.39 26.93 19.75 American Samoa 8.24 - 8.26 - 1052.67 - 30.00 - 30.87 - 233.00 - Arizona 9.49 21.89 9.45 21.88 5.78 21.86 18.96 19.81 17.59 19.87 16.34 20.25 Arkansas 8.26 4.88 8.44 3.98 7.85 5.38 21.40 - 21.94 - 27.37 - California 7.69 5.44 7.61 5.23 8.19 5.61 18.49 10.00 18.13 17.00 20.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A4.txt
  • Monitoring Report at http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/iatd/monitor.html. Source: Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC). Table 2.11 Link Up Assistance Annual Payments by State or Jurisdictio n 2 - 52 State or Jurisdiction Non- Non- Non- General Tribal General Tribal General Tribal Tribal Tribal Tribal Tribal Tribal Tribal Alabama $9.73 $6.30 $9.09 $8.31 $7.94 $8.27 $25.70 - $26.75 - $29.76 - Alaska 10.32 18.66 10.45 20.19 8.92 17.98 25.17 18.39 - 18.39 26.93 19.75 American Samoa 8.24 - 8.26 - 1052.67 - 30.00 - 30.87 - 233.00 - Arizona 9.49 21.89 9.45 21.88 5.78 21.86 18.96 19.81 17.59 19.87 16.34 20.25 Arkansas 8.26 4.88 8.44 3.98 7.85 5.38 21.40 - 21.94 - 27.37 - California 7.69 5.44 7.61 5.23 8.19 5.61 18.49 10.00 18.13 17.00 20.17
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.txt
  • C CONSOLIDATED COMM-TX -0.37 -4.83 4.69 -16.87 442112 C MID-PLAINS RURAL TEL 0.63 -1.87 2.55 -9.86 442114 C CENTEL OF TEXAS -0.27 -8.52 9.02 0.00 442116 C MUENSTER DBA NORTEX 24.93 -2.20 27.74 45.66 442117 C CENTURYTEL-PORT ARAN -2.68 -4.38 1.78 -78.80 442130 C PEOPLES TEL COOP -TX 0.61 -3.77 4.55 -4.09 442131 C POKA-LAMBRO TEL COOP -5.84 -5.67 -0.19 -20.19 442134 C RIVIERA TEL CO INC 8.43 -5.41 14.63 11.16 442135 C SOUTHWEST TEXAS TEL 6.92 -3.41 10.70 8.46 442140 C CENTURYTEL-SAN MARCO -1.25 -2.15 0.93 -100.00 442141 C SANTA ROSA TEL COOP 12.11 -5.49 18.62 21.34 442143 C SOUTH PLAINS TEL 1.37 -3.57 5.12 -7.99 442147 C WINDSTREAM SUGARLAND -7.24 -7.21 -0.03 0.00 442150 C TATUM TEL CO -0.26
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304637A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304637A2.txt
  • Ericsson Z310 PY7A1032021 08/ 07 12/ 10 GSM, GSM 850, 1900 M3 N/A N Basic Barnes City Cooperative Telephone Co. UMEOX Q421 ITEXT365 WNKUMEOX-Q42107/ 09 12/ 10 GSM, GSM 850, 1900 M3 T3 N Feature Blanca Telephone Company Motorola V3m IHDT56FT1 01/ 10 12/ 10 CDMA, CDMA 800, 1900 M4 T4 N De minimis service providers are exempted from Section 20.19 HAC requirements via subsection 20.19(e). Blanca Telephone Company Motorola V3s IHDT56JE1 01/ 10 12/ 10 CDMA, CDMA, CDMA, CDMA 850, 1700, 1900, 2100 M4 T4 N Service provider is a de minimis service provider and is not required to complywith HAC requirements pursuant to Section 20.19(e). Bluegrass Wireless LLC Blackberry 8230 Pearl Flip L6ARCE20CW 01/ 10 12/ 10 CDMA, CDMA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304701A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304701A2.txt
  • (s) FCC ID (s) Starting Available Date Ending Available Date Air Interface Technology(ies) Operating Frequency Bands M- Rating T- Rating Wi-Fi Interface Functionality Level Service Provider All Handsets January 1, 2010 - December 31, 2010 Blanca Telephone Company Motorola V3m IHDT56FT1 01/ 10 12/ 10 CDMA, CDMA 800, 1900 M4 T4 N De minimis service providers are exempted from Section 20.19 HAC requirements via subsection 20.19(e). Blanca Telephone Company Motorola V3s IHDT56JE1 01/ 10 12/ 10 CDMA, CDMA, CDMA, CDMA 850, 1700, 1900, 2100 M4 T4 N Service provider is a de minimis service provider and is not required to comply with HAC requirements pursuant to Section 20.19(e). Bluegrass Wireless LLCBlackberry 8230 Pearl Flip L6ARCE20CW 01/ 10 12/ 10 CDMA, CDMA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307406A1.pdf
  • Docket No. 95-116, First Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration, 12 FCC Rcd 7236 (1997). See also 47 C.F.R. § 52.31. 33 See, e.g., Section 68.4(a) of the Commission's Rules Governing Hearing Aid-Compatible Telephones, WT Docket No. 01-309, Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 16753, 16764-65 ¶ 26 (2003)); Erratum, 18 FCC Rcd 18047 (2003). See also 47 C.F.R. § 20.19. 34 See, e.g., Reexamination of Roaming Obligations of Commercial Mobile Radio Service Providers, WT Docket No. 05-265, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 22 FCC Rcd 15817 (2007); Order on Reconsideration and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 25 FCC Rcd 4181 (2010); Second Report and Order, FCC 11-52 (rel. Apr. 7, 2011) ( Commercial Data Roaming
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-168A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-168A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-168A1.txt
  • summaries thereof) will also be published in the Federal Register. See 5 U.S.C. § 604(b). Effective Date of Adopted Rules Pursuant to 5 U.S.C § 553(d), the rules adopted herein shall take effect thirty (30) days after publication in the Federal Register. APPENDIX C - FINAL RULES Revise Part 20 to include New Hearing Aid Compatibility Provision as follows: [§ 20.19] Hearing Aid-Compatible Mobile Handsets. (a) Scope of section. This section is applicable to providers of Broadband Personal Communications Services (part 24, subpart E of this chapter), Cellular Radio Telephone Service (part 22, subpart H of this chapter), and Specialized Mobile Radio Services in the 800 MHz and 900 MHz bands (included in part 90, subpart S of this chapter) if
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-168A1_Erratum.doc
  • summaries thereof) will also be published in the Federal Register. See 5 U.S.C. § 604(b). Effective Date of Adopted Rules Pursuant to 5 U.S.C § 553(d), the rules adopted herein shall take effect thirty (30) days after publication in the Federal Register. APPENDIX C - FINAL RULES Revise Part 20 to include New Hearing Aid Compatibility Provision as follows: [§ 20.19] Hearing Aid-Compatible Mobile Handsets. (a) Scope of section. This section is applicable to providers of Broadband Personal Communications Services (part 24, subpart E of this chapter), Cellular Radio Telephone Service (part 22, subpart H of this chapter), and Specialized Mobile Radio Services in the 800 MHz and 900 MHz bands (included in part 90, subpart S of this chapter) if
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-122A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-122A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-122A1.txt
  • expeditiously review future final versions of this standard either on our own motion or upon request. We affirm the Commission's authority to establish the preliminary handset deployment benchmark specific to Tier I wireless carriers, and we modify the requirement in order to provide greater certainty while not adversely affecting hearing impaired individuals' access to compatible phones. Specifically, we modify Section 20.19(c) of the Commission's rules on hearing aid compatible mobile handsets to require that, by September 16, 2005, each Tier I wireless carrier offering digital wireless services must make available to consumers, per air interface, four U3-rated handsets, or twenty-five percent of the total number of handsets it offers nationwide; and that, by September 16, 2006, each Tier I wireless carrier
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-166A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-166A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-166A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Section 68.4(a) of the Commission's Rules Governing Hearing Aid-Compatible Telephones Cingular Wireless LLC Petition for Waiver of Section 20.19(c)(3)(i)(A) of the Commission's Rules ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) WT Docket No. 01-309 Adopted: September 7, 2005 Released: September 8, 2005 By the Commission: Commissioner Copps issuing a statement. Introduction We have before us two submissions pertaining to the hearing aid compatibility of digital wireless handsets employing the GSM air interface. First, the HAC Incubator Working Group
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-166A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-166A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-166A2.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit STATEMENT OF COMMISSIONER MICHAEL J. COPPS RE: Section 68.4(a) of the Commission's Rules Governing Hearing Aid-Compatible Telephones; Cingular Wireless LLC Petition for Waiver of Section 20.19(c)(3)(i)(A) of the Commission's Rules, Memorandum Opinion and Order (WT Docket No. 01-309). Today's Order grants Cingular Wireless a limited waiver of our hearing aid compatibility rules as they apply to wireless phones. It is with some hesitation that I support this action. I have said before that strong and clear rules are critical to accomplishing the statutory goal of ensuring
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-169A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-169A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-169A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Section 68.4(a) of the Commission's Rules Governing Hearing Aid-Compatible Telephones T-Mobile USA, Inc. Petition for Waiver of Section 20.19(c)(3) of the Commission's Rules Samsung Telecommunications America, L.P. Request for Waiver of Section 20.19(c)(1)(i) of the Commission's Rules ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) WT Docket No. 01-309 Adopted: September 16, 2005 Released: September 16, 2005 By the Commission: Commissioner Copps issuing a statement We have before us a request for waiver from T-Mobile USA,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-169A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-169A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-169A2.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit i STATEMENT OF COMMISSIONER MICHAEL J. COPPS RE: Section 68.4(a) of the Commission's Rules Governing Hearing Aid-Compatible Telephones; T-Mobile Petition for Waiver of Section 20.19(c)(3)(i)(A) of the Commission's Rules, Memorandum Opinion and Order (WT Docket No. 01-309). Today's Order grants T-Mobile a short extension in complying with our hearing aid compatibility rules. As I stated last week when the Commission granted a waiver to Cingular Wireless, I am unhappy that we find ourselves having to do this. Again with hesitation, I will support today's action
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-79A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-79A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-79A1.txt
  • June 30, 2004, at 2 (WCV 2004 Amended Waiver Petition). See id. at 1. Id. In its original petition, WCV also sought relief from the one-hundred percent benchmark to December 31, 2004. See WCV 2003 Waiver Petition at 10. WCV subsequently reported that it met this requested deadline. See Second Supplement to Wireless Communications Venture Petition for Waiver of Section 20.19(g) of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No. 94-102, filed Jan. 24, 2005, at 1. See Order to Stay, 18 FCC Rcd at 20997 ¶ 27. See WCV Second Interim Report Regarding E911 Phase II deployment Wireless Communications Venture, CC Docket No. 94-102, filed Jan. 14, 2004, at 2 (WCV Second Interim Report). Id. at 2-3. See Order to Stay, 18
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-114A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-114A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-114A1.txt
  • or wireline local exchange service; and (4) it is technically and operationally feasible for the service or device to support E911. Applying these criteria, the Commission determined in the E911 Scope Order to amend its rules to include additional service offerings within the scope of the E911 requirements, including telematics, and resold and prepaid mobile wireless services. Sections 20.18(a) and 20.19(a) currently specify that service providers within certain enumerated radio services (cellular, PCS, and SMR) are subject to the 911/E911 and hearing aid-compatibility requirements. These rule sections have not been expanded to include licensees providing service in later authorized, additional wireless services such as in the 700 MHz Band, although many of the services permitted in the 700 MHz Band can
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-103A1.DOC http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-103A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-103A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-103A1.txt
  • Reconsideration and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 20 FCC Rcd 11221 (2005) (Hearing Aid Compatibility Order on Reconsideration). The Commission adopted these requirements for digital wireless handsets under authority of a provision of the Hearing Aid Compatibility Act of 1988, codified at Section 710(b)(2)(C) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 610(b)(2)(C). See 47 C.F.R. § 20.19(e)(1)-(2). The de minimis exception applies on a per air interface basis, and provides that manufacturers or mobile service providers that offer two or fewer digital wireless handsets in the U.S. are exempt from the requirements of the hearing aid compatibility rules. For mobile service providers that obtain handsets only from manufacturers that offer two or fewer digital wireless handset models
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-132A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-132A1.pdf
  • that would hamper or defeat the network-based E911 solution. If a network provider accepts a non-carrier device or application and if the device or application subsequently causes a violation of our rules, we will apply the same third-party liability provisions as in the wireline context. We find that a wireless service provider's obligations under our hearing aid compatibility rule, Section 20.19, are not affected by the obligations we impose here. Because equipment manufacturers have an independent obligation to satisfy our hearing aid compatibility rules, a wireless service provider may not refuse to connect a handset on the grounds that it is not hearing aid-compatible. Under the Commission's rules, the extent of a wireless service provider's compliance with such obligations is not
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-132A1_Erratum.doc
  • that would hamper or defeat the network-based E911 solution. If a network provider accepts a non-carrier device or application and if the device or application subsequently causes a violation of our rules, we will apply the same third-party liability provisions as in the wireline context. We find that a wireless service provider's obligations under our hearing aid compatibility rule, Section 20.19, are not affected by the obligations we impose here. Because equipment manufacturers have an independent obligation to satisfy our hearing aid compatibility rules, a wireless service provider may not refuse to connect a handset on the grounds that it is not hearing aid-compatible. Under the Commission's rules, the extent of a wireless service provider's compliance with such obligations is not
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-192A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-192A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-192A1.txt
  • (HLAA), Gallaudet University Technology Access Program (TAP), and Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center on Telecommunications Access (RERC). As recommended in the Staff Report, we tentatively conclude substantially to adopt the provisions of the Joint Consensus Plan, and we seek comment on this tentative conclusion and several related matters. In particular, we tentatively conclude to modify the handset deployment deadlines in Section 20.19 along the framework proposed in the Joint Consensus Plan, including (1) modifying the upcoming February 18, 2008 benchmark that requires that manufacturers and wireless service providers ensure that at least 50 percent of their handset models over each air interface meet a U3/M3 or better rating for radio frequency (RF) interference reduction and (2) imposing new benchmarks for deploying handsets
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-200A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-200A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-200A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Section 68.4(a) of the Commission's Rules Governing Hearing Aid-Compatible Telephones Petitions for Waiver of Section 20.19 of the Commission's Rules ) ) ) ) ) ) ) WT Docket No. 01-309 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: November 19, 2007 Released: November 23, 2007 By the Commission: Table of Contents Heading Paragraph # I. Introduction 1 II. background 4 A. Hearing Aid Compatibility Requirements and Deadlines 4 B. Petitions For Waiver 7 C. Motions to Withdraw 12
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-51A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-51A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-51A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Section 68.4(a) of the Commission's Rules Governing Hearing Aid-Compatible Telephones Petitions for Waiver of Section 20.19 of the Commission's Rules ) ) ) ) ) ) ) WT Docket No. 01-309 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: April 6, 2007 Released: April 11, 2007 By the Commission: Table of Contents Heading Paragraph # I. Introduction 1 II. background 2 III. discussion 8 A. Waiver Requests From Petitioners Offering Dual-Band GSM Handset Models 10 1. Dobson Communications Corp.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-69A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-69A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-69A1.txt
  • (2003) (adopting technical, labeling and encoding rules to permit television sets to be built with ``plug and play'' functionality for one-way digital cable services); Truth-in-Billing and Billing Format, 20 FCC Rcd 6448 (2005) (mandating that billing practices, including line items, be truthful and non-misleading), vacated on other grounds, NASUCA v. FCC, 457 F.3d 1238 (11th Cir. 2006); 47 C.F.R. § 20.19 (labeling requirements for hearing-aid compatible mobile handsets). See 5 U.S.C. § 604. See 5 U.S.C. § 553(d)(3) (``The required publication or service of a substantive rule shall be made not less than 30 days before its effective date, except ... as otherwise provided by the agency for good cause found and published with the rule.''). See also 47 C.F.R. §§
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-72A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-72A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-72A1.txt
  • that section. Thus, if a provider offers a non-voice service, this will not trigger the § 20.18 requirements for that provider. Hearing Aid-Compatible Wireless Handsets Background. In addition to proposing the extension of 911/E911 requirements to services provided in new spectrum bands, the Commission also sought comment on whether it should similarly extend the hearing aid compatibility requirements under § 20.19. The requirements of § 20.19 were established by the Commission pursuant to the Hearing Aid Compatibility Act of 1988 and a determination by the Commission in 2003 to lift the blanket exemption under that law for digital wireless telephones. Section 20.19 of the Commission's rules requires the providers of certain enumerated wireless services and the manufacturers of handsets used in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-72A1_Erratum.doc
  • that section. Thus, if a provider offers a non-voice service, this will not trigger the § 20.18 requirements for that provider. Hearing Aid-Compatible Wireless Handsets Background. In addition to proposing the extension of 911/E911 requirements to services provided in new spectrum bands, the Commission also sought comment on whether it should similarly extend the hearing aid compatibility requirements under § 20.19. The requirements of § 20.19 were established by the Commission pursuant to the Hearing Aid Compatibility Act of 1988 and a determination by the Commission in 2003 to lift the blanket exemption under that law for digital wireless telephones. Section 20.19 of the Commission's rules requires the providers of certain enumerated wireless services and the manufacturers of handsets used in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-117A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-117A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-117A1.txt
  • and Order are corrected as set forth in Appendix A. order on reconsideration Stay of February 18, 2008 Benchmark Background. On November 7, 2007, the Commission released a Second Report and Order and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in the above-captioned proceeding, in which, among other things, we stayed enforcement of the February 18, 2008 hearing aid-compatible handset benchmark in Sections 20.19(c)(1)(ii), 20.19(c)(2)(ii), and 20.19(c)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules until April 18, 2008. Under existing rules, manufacturers and wireless service providers are required to ensure that, by February 18, 2008, at least 50 percent of their handset models over each air interface meet a U3/M3 (or higher) rating for RF interference reduction, as codified in Section 20.19 of our rules. However, in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-56A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-56A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-56A1.txt
  • (2003) (adopting technical, labeling and encoding rules to permit television sets to be built with ``plug and play'' functionality for one-way digital cable services); Truth-in-Billing and Billing Format, 20 FCC Rcd 6448 (2005) (mandating that billing practices, including line items, be truthful and non-misleading), vacated on other grounds, NASUCA v. FCC, 457 F.3d 1238 (11th Cir. 2006); 47 C.F.R. § 20.19 (labeling requirements for hearing-aid compatible mobile handsets). Comments of USTA at 13. The very Congressional inquiries that in initiated this proceeding, however, make it clear that Congress does now and has always considered DTV transition education to be an integral part of the DTV transition which the Commission is leading. See, generally, Letter. Paragraph 5, supra. Comments of USTA at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-67A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-67A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-67A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Section 68.4(a) of the Commission's Rules Governing Hearing Aid-Compatible Telephones Petitions for Waiver of Section 20.19 of the Commission's Rules ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) WT Docket No. 01-309 Adopted: February 26, 2008 Released: February 27, 2008 By the Commission: Table of Contents Heading Paragraph # I. Introduction 1 II. background 3 III. discussion 9 A. Waiver Requests from Tier III Carriers 9 1. CDMA and GSM Carriers 10 a. Advantage, BLEW,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-68A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-68A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-68A1.txt
  • Mobile Communications (GSM) handsets that both meet the requisite M3 (or higher) rating for acoustic coupling capability and include certain popular features, and thereby ensure that the impact of the rules remains as technology-impartial as possible while also ensuring the availability of hearing aid-compatible handsets to consumers. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Under the Commission's wireless hearing aid compatibility requirements, codified at Section 20.19 of the rules, mobile service providers and handset manufacturers must offer a certain number of digital wireless handset models that are compatible with the use of hearing aids through reductions in the RF interference caused by the handsets and through an internal capacity for inductive coupling with a telecoil. The rules also specify American National Standards Institute (ANSI) C63.19 as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-99A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-99A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-99A1.txt
  • 23. Id. Id. AT&T Comments at 15. Alert Systems Comments at 18. Id. Wireless RERC Comments at 11. Id. at 11-12. Wireless RERC also states that CMS providers should notify those subscribers whose mobile devices require upgrading to support CMAS. Id. at 12. AAPC Comments at 7-8. Id. at 18. DataFM Comments at 12-13. MetroPCS Comments, citing 47 C.F.R. § 20.19. CellCast Comments at 43-44. The CMSAAC recommendations state that ``[a] unique vibration cadence (if supported by the mobile device) should be provided as well as a unique audio attention signal.'' CMSAAC Recommendations at § 5.5.2. To the extent that this language implies that CMAS-capable mobile devices do not have to supply a unique vibration cadence, we disagree. Rather, we believe
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-68A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-68A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-68A1.txt
  • 8 (2002) (eliminating provision requiring cellular carriers to provide subscribers with service area information). We note that the Commission's wireless hearing aid compatibility rules require service providers to provide information about, and allow consumers to test, in retail stores owned and operated by the service providers, the hearing aid compatibility of the different handsets they offer. See 47 C.F.R. § 20.19. In the Second Truth-in-Billing Order and FNPRM, the Commission noted that various parties at that time expressed support for mandating point-of-sale disclosures. Second Truth-in-Billing Order and FNPRM, 20 FCC Rcd at 6477, para. 55. In response to the concerns expressed by these parties, the Commission tentatively concluded that carriers must disclose the full rate, including any non-mandated line items, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-145A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-145A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-145A1.txt
  • established for the 698-749, 747-762 and 777-792 MHz bands in 2007, the Commission encouraged ANSI and the various stakeholders in the hearing aid compatibility process to work together towards adoption of technical standards in these bands so that hearing aid users will have the same accessibility to services in these bands as they do in the bands addressed in Section 20.19(a) of the Commission's rules. Therefore, ANSI C63.19 initiated a revision to the current C63.19-2007 Standard to expand hearing aid compatibility testing to wireless handsets in these bands as well as other bands. Upon completion, this revision is expected to provide guidance and a test method that can be used for wireless handsets over any existing or future air interface in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-145A1_Rcd.pdf
  • Aid Compatible Telephones, WT Docket No. 01-309, Second Report and Order and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 22 FCC Rcd 19670, 19679 ¶ 22 (2007) (2007 Second Report and Order). 8Amendment of the Commission's Rules Governing Hearing Aid Compatible Mobile Handsets, WT Docket No. 07-250, First Report and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 3406 (2008) (First Report and Order). 947 C.F.R. § 20.19(a)(1) and (2). CMRS is defined as mobile service that is provided for profit, interconnected, and available to the public. 47 C.F.R. § 20.3; see 47 U.S.C. § 332(d)(1). 10The term airinterface refers to the system that ensures compatibility between mobile radio service equipment, such as handsets, and the service provider's base stations. Currently, the leading air interfaces include Code Division
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-59A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-59A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-59A1.txt
  • 63; 47 C.F.R. §§ 20.3, 20.12(d). See 2007 Report and Order, 22 FCC Rcd at 15835 ¶ 48. Id ; 47 C.F.R. § 20.3. 47 C.F.R. § 20.12(a)(2). The Commission has used this formulation to define the scope of CMRS carriers, and services subject to certain regulatory obligations, including E911, 47 C.F.R. § 20.18(a), Hearing Aid Compatibility, 47 C.F.R. § 20.19(a), and manual roaming, 47 C.F.R. § 20.12(a). It initially developed this standard to define the subset of CMRS carriers that would be subject to the Commission's resale requirements, which have sunset. Interconnection and Resale Obligations Pertaining to Commercial Mobile Radio Services, CC Docket No. 94-54, First Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 18455, 18464 ¶ 16 (1996). The Commission noted
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-59A1_Rcd.pdf
  • 63; 47 C.F.R. §§ 20.3, 20.12(d). 10See 2007 Report and Order, 22 FCC Rcd at 15835 ¶ 48. 11Id ; 47 C.F.R. § 20.3. 1247 C.F.R. § 20.12(a)(2). The Commission has used this formulation to define the scope of CMRS carriers, and services subject to certain regulatory obligations, including E911, 47 C.F.R. § 20.18(a), Hearing Aid Compatibility, 47 C.F.R. § 20.19(a), and manual roaming, 47 C.F.R. § 20.12(a). It initially developed this standard to define the subset of CMRS carriers that would be subject tothe Commission's resale requirements, which have sunset. Interconnection and Resale Obligations Pertaining to Commercial Mobile Radio Services, CC Docket No. 94-54, First Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 18455, 18464 ¶ 16 (1996). The Commission noted that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-81A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-81A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-81A1.txt
  • period from January 1 to June 30, 2009. Starting in July 2010, handset manufacturers are required to file their hearing aid compatibility status reports annually on July 15 for the twelve month reporting period from July 1st of the prior year to June 30th of the reporting year. See also http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/index.htm?job=home for more details on these reports. 47 C.F.R. § 20.19. , supra (defining smartphone for purposes of this report). Based on data from hearing aid compatibility status reports filed by handset manufacturers in July 2009, available at http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/index.htm?job=home. Based on data from hearing aid compatibility status reports filed by handset manufacturers in July 2009, available at http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/index.htm?job=home. See Sony Ericsson Launches the New Brand XPERIA with the Unveiling of XPERIA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-81A1_Rcd.pdf
  • reports by July 15, 2009,for the reporting period from January1 to June 30, 2009. Starting in July 2010, handset manufacturers are required to file their hearing aid compatibility status reports annually on July 15 for the twelve month reportingperiod from July 1stof the prior year to June 30thof the reporting year. See alsohttp://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/index.htm?job=homefor more details on these reports.47 C.F.R. § 20.19. 799See Section IV.B.3, Differentiation in Mobile Wireless Handsets/Devices, supra(defining smartphone for purposes of this report). 11584 Federal Communications Commission FCC 10-81 handset manufacturers offered atotal of 56smartphones in June 2009.800Table28lists thetop five smartphone and handset manufacturers, bynumber of models offered,that distributed in the United Statesin June 2009. RIM, HTC and Samsung offered the most smartphone models, while Samsung, Motorola and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-91A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-91A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-91A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Section 68.4(a) of the Commission's Rules Governing Hearing Aid-Compatible Telephones Petitions for Waiver of Section 20.19 of the Commission's Rules ) ) ) ) ) ) ) WT Docket No. 01-309 ORDER ON RECONSIDERATION Adopted: May 25, 2010 Released: May 26, 2010 By the Commission: Table of Contents Heading Paragraph # I. Introduction 1 II. background 4 III. discussion 6 A. Petition of CC Communications 7 B. Petition of South Central Utah Telephone Association 10 C.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-91A1_Rcd.pdf
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Federal Communications Commission FCC 10-91 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Section 68.4(a) of the Commission's Rules Governing Hearing Aid-Compatible Telephones Petitions for Waiver of Section 20.19 of the Commission's Rules )))))))WT Docket No. 01-309 ORDER ON RECONSIDERATION Adopted: May 25, 2010 Released: May 26, 2010 By the Commission: TABLE OF CONTENTS Heading Paragraph # I. INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................1 II. BACKGROUND.............................................................................................................................4 III. DISCUSSION..................................................................................................................................6 A. Petition of CC Communications................................................................................................7 B. Petition of South Central Utah Telephone Association............................................................10 C. Petition of Uintah Basin Electronic Telecommunications d/b/a UBET Wireless....................14 D. Petition of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-103A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-103A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-103A1.txt
  • Preview: Wireless Remains Challenging, Morgan Stanley, Feb. 23, 2010; Company Update, Cincinnati Bell, Inc. (CCB), Goldman Sachs, Feb. 11, 2010) . These reports include information (such as handset maker, model name, starting available date and end available date) for each handset model offered by the handset manufacturer during the reporting period. for more details on these reports. 47 C.F.R. § 20.19. , supra (defining smartphone for purposes of this report). . . , supra; Fourteenth Report, 25 FCC Rcd at 11495, ¶ 136. . . . . . . . . . See 910 Handsets Q2 2010 SNLK, USA Handset Shipments. See Fourteenth Report, 25 FCC Rcd at 11586, ¶ 304. SNL Kagan. , supra. Our data currently cannot separate 1xRTT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-103A1_Rcd.pdf
  • reports by July 15, 2009,for the reporting period from January1 to June 30, 2009. Starting in July 2010, handset manufacturers are required to file their hearing aid compatibility status reports annually on July 15 for the twelve month reportingperiod from July 1of the prior year to June 30thof the reporting year. See alsohttp://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/index.htm?job=homefor more details on these reports.47 C.F.R. § 20.19. 932SeeSection IV.B.3, Differentiation in Mobile Wireless Handsets/Devices, supra(defining smartphone for purposes of this report). 933Based on data from hearing aid compatibility status reports filed by handset manufacturers in July 2009and July 2010,available athttp://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/index.htm?job=home. 9848 Federal Communications Commission FCC 11-103 modelsas well as the most handset models.934 Table 30 Smartphone Manufacturers Offering Largest Number of Smartphone Models (U.S., June 2010) Top
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-33A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-33A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-33A1.txt
  • on Reconsideration addressing the petitions for reconsideration and also issued a Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking seeking additional comment on whether to adopt an automatic data roaming obligation. Reexamination of Roaming Obligations of Commercial Mobile Radio Service Providers, WT Docket No. 05-265, Order on Reconsideration and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 25 FCC Rcd 4181 (2010). 47 C.F.R. § 20.19. Amendment Section 68.4(a) of the Commission's Rules Governing Hearing Aid-Compatible Mobile Handsets Telephones, WT Docket No. 07-250, Petition of American National Standards Institute Accredited Standards Committee C63 (EMC) ANSI ASC C63(R)s. 01-309, 06-203, First Report and Order and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 23 FCC Rcd 3406 (2008) (``Hearing Aid Compatibility First Report and Order''). Under this exception, manufacturers
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-37A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-37A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-37A1.txt
  • to ensure the marketability or availability of new technologies to users.'. (d) Rule of Construction- Section 710(h) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 610(h)) is amended to read as follows: `(h) Rule of Construction- Nothing in the Twenty-First Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act of 2010 shall be construed to modify the Commission's regulations set forth in section 20.19 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations, as in effect on the date of enactment of such Act.'. SEC. 103. RELAY SERVICES. (a) Definition- Paragraph (3) of section 225(a) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 225(a)(3)) is amended to read as follows: `(3) TELECOMMUNICATIONS RELAY SERVICES- The term `telecommunications relay services' means telephone transmission services that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-39A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-39A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-39A1.txt
  • FRN: 0006945950 NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE Adopted: April 13, 2012 Released: April 13, 2012 By the Commission: INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of eight hundred nineteen thousand dollars ($819,000) against T-Mobile USA, Inc. (T-Mobile). As detailed herein, we find that T-Mobile apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Sections 20.19(c)(2) and 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's rules (Rules). We further find that this apparent misconduct persisted for the two-year period, 2009-2010. Specifically, T-Mobile, a nationwide wireless carrier with more than 33 million customers and more than $21 billion dollars in annual revenue, apparently failed to offer the required number of hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset models as set forth in the
• http://licensing.fcc.gov/prod/ib/forms/help/GrandFatherList.pdf
  • Communications, Inc.) PR HUMACAO 2 18°9'5.0 "N 65°47'20.0 "W n/s SESRWL2000091201765 TELECOMMUNICACIONES ULTRAMARINAS DE PUERTO RICO VA QUICKSBURG 38°43'45.39"N 78°39'25.10"W 83 SESLIC2000082401509 MCI Communications Services, Inc. (fka MCI WorldCom Communications, Inc.) CA MALIBU 34°4'50.29"N 118°53'46.39"W n/s SESRWL2000072401194 AT&T CORP. ME ANDOVER 44°38'1.2 "N 70°41'51.29"W 83 SESLIC2000062201004 MCI Communications Services, Inc. (fka MCI WorldCom Communications, Inc.) CA SALT CREEK (SCK 3A) 38°56'20.19"N 122°8'48.0 "W n/s SESRWL1999101201864 Xaba Ranch, LLC CA MALIBU 34°4'51.0 "N 118°53'44.0 "W 27 SESMOD1998081701066 AT&T CORP. CA MALIBU 34°4'49.70"N 118°53'43.89"W 27 SESMOD1998081701067 AT&T CORP. CA SYLMAR 34°19'4.0 "N 118°29'0.0 "W 27 SESRWL1999022500279 GLOBECAST NORTH AMERICA INCORPORATED NJ FRANKLIN 41°7'4.0 "N 74°34'33.0 "W n/s SESLIC1999031200365 SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, L.P. FL MIAMI 25°50'26.0 "N 80°19'3.0 "W 27 SESMOD1999042201041 GLOBECAST NORTH AMERICA
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1867A1.html
  • of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: April 25, 2007 Released: April 25, 2007 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find IT&E Overseas, Inc. ("IT&E") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of sixteen thousand dollars ($16,000) for its willful and repeated violations of Section 20.19(f) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The apparent violations involve IT&E's failure to comply with the labeling requirements for digital wireless hearing aid-compatible handsets. II. Background 2. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission took a number of actions to further the ability of persons with hearing disabilities to access digital wireless telecommunications. Among other actions, the Commission required
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-2118A1.html
  • Pine Cellular Phones, Inc. FRN # 0001699776 ) Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: May 21, 2007 Released: May 22, 2007 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Pine Telephone Company d/b/a Pine Cellular Phones, Inc. ("Pine") apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(f) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by failing to comply with the labeling requirements for digital wireless hearing aid-compatible handsets. For Pine's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of sixteen thousand dollars ($16,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission took a number of actions to further
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3524A1.html
  • Litchfield County Cellular, Inc. d/b/a Ramcell of Kentucky, and Litchfield County Cellular, Inc. d/b/a Ramcell of Oregon ("Ramcell Licensees"). The Consent Decree terminates the Bureau's investigations into the Ramcell Licensees' compliance with the Enhanced 911 requirements set forth in Section 20.18(g)(1)(i)-(v) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), and the hearing aid compatibility requirements for digital wireless handsets set forth in Section 20.19(c)(2) of the Rules. 2. The Enforcement Bureau and the Ramcell Licensees have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve these matters and terminate the investigations. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. Based on the record before us, we conclude that no substantial or material questions of fact exist with
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-4339A1.html
  • ) Blue Sky Communications FRN # 0007435902 ) Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: October 18, 2007 Released: October 22, 2007 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that AST Telecom, LLC d/b/a Blue Sky Communications ("Blue Sky") apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(f) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by failing to comply with the labeling requirements for digital wireless hearing aid-compatible handsets. For Blue Sky's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of eight thousand dollars ($8,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission took a number of actions to
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-4481A1.html
  • No. 200832100004 Association, Inc. ) FRN # 0001607175 ) Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: October 31, 2007 Released: November 1, 2007 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that South Central Utah Telephone Association, Inc. ("South Central") apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(f) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by failing to comply with the labeling requirements for digital wireless hearing aid-compatible handsets. For South Central's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-four thousand dollars ($24,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission took a number of actions to
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-4745A1.html
  • By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Memorandum Opinion and Order, we admonish XIT Telecommunications & Technology, Ltd. d/b/a XIT Cellular ("XIT") for failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings two handset models that meet the hearing aid compatibility requirements for radio frequency interference by September 16, 2005 in violation of Section 20.19(c)(2)(i)(B)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). II. BACKGROUND 2. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission took a number of actions to further the ability of persons with hearing disabilities to access digital wireless telecommunications. Among other actions, the Commission required manufacturers and digital wireless service providers to collectively take steps to increase the number of hearing aid-compatible handset
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1157A1.html
  • Inc. ) FRN No. 0001623321 ) ORDER Adopted: May 19, 2008 Released: May 21, 2008 By the Deputy Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Custer Telephone Cooperative, Inc. ("Custer"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Custer for possible violations of section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") regarding the inductive coupling hearing aid compatibility requirements. 2. The Bureau and Custer have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve these matters. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1186A1.html
  • Choice Wireless, LC ) FRN No. 0004250056 ) ORDER Adopted: June 2, 2008 Released: June 10, 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Choice Wireless, LC ("Choice"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Choice for possible violation of section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") regarding the inductive coupling hearing aid compatibility requirements. 2. The Bureau and Choice have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1291A1.html
  • Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: June 2, 2008 Released: June 4, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Farmers Cellular Telephone, Inc. ("Farmers Cellular"), a Global System for Mobile Communications ("GSM") carrier serving rural Alabama, apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by September 18, 2006. For Farmers Cellular's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of thirty thousand dollars ($30,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. In
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1314A1.html
  • forfeiture of sixty thousand dollars ($60,000) against SunCom Wireless, Inc. ("SunCom"), a Global System for Mobile Communications-based ("GSM-based") Tier II carrier, serving most of North and South Carolina, parts of the bordering states of Virginia, Tennessee and Georgia ("mainland"), and Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. As detailed herein, we find that SunCom apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by the September 18, 2006 deadline. II. BACKGROUND 2. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of individuals with hearing disabilities to
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1369A1.html
  • apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: June 9, 2008 Released: June 11, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Union Telephone Company ("Union"), a Global System for Mobile Communications-based ("GSM") carrier serving rural Wyoming, Colorado, Utah, and Idaho, apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings, by September 18, 2006, at least two models that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility. For Union's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. In the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1398A1.html
  • 0002377901 ) Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: June 11, 2008 Released: June 13, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that PinPoint Wireless, Inc. ("PinPoint"), a Global System for Mobile Communications-based ("GSM") carrier serving rural Nebraska, apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by September 18, 2006. For PinPoint's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of thirty thousand dollars ($30,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. In the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1423A1.html
  • ) Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: June 16, 2008 Released: June 18, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Blanca Telephone Company ("Blanca"), a Code Division Multiple Access-based ("CDMA-based") Tier III carrier, serving rural Colorado, apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by the September 18, 2006 deadline. For Blanca's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000). II. BACKGROUND 2.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1424A1.html
  • In the Matter of ) NAL/Acct. No. 200832100055 Centennial Communications Corp. ) FRN No. 0003296480 ) Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: June 17, 2008 Released: June 17, 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Centennial Communications Corp. ("Centennial") apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models for the GSM air interface in its mainland wireless network that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by September 18, 2006. For Centennial's apparent violation, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-14A1.html
  • No. 200832100009 ) Company, L.P. FRN # 0004285698 ) Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: January 2, 2008 Released: January 3, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that South Canaan Cellular Communications Company, L.P. ("South Canaan") apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by September 18, 2006. For South Canaan's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. In
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1625A1.html
  • No. 0015360456 ) ORDER Adopted: July 11, 2008 Released: July 14, 2008 By the Deputy Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and NE Colorado Cellular, Inc., dba Viaero Wireless ("Viaero"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Viaero for possible violation of section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") regarding inductive coupling hearing aid compatibility handset requirements. 2. The Bureau and Viaero have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1716A1.html
  • ) FRN No. 0002701688 ) ORDER Adopted: July 30, 2008 Released: August 1, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Airadigm Communications, Inc. ("Airadigm"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Airadigm for possible violations of section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") regarding the inductive coupling hearing aid compatibility requirements. 2. The Bureau and Airadigm have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1719A1.html
  • 2008 Released: July 28, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and IT&E Overseas, Inc. ("IT&E"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation and a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL") by the Bureau against IT&E for possible violations of section 20.19(f) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") regarding IT&E's failure to comply with the labeling requirements for digital wireless hearing aid-compatible handsets, and an investigation by the Bureau against IT&E for possible violations of section 20.19(d)(2) of the Rules regarding IT&E's failure to offer at least two digital wireless handset models meeting the Commission's standards for inductive coupling by the compliance deadline.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1828A1.html
  • NAL/Acct. No. 200832100064 Corr Wireless Communications, LLC ) FRN # 0003804101 ) Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: July 31, 2008 Released: July 31, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Corr Wireless Communications, LLC ("Corr") apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by September 18, 2006. For Corr's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of thirty thousand dollars ($30,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. In the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-182A1.html
  • ) dba Mid-Rivers Cellular FRN # 0001634443 ) Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: February 8, 2008 Released: February 11, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Cable & Communications Corporation dba Mid-Rivers Cellular ("Mid-Rivers Cellular") apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by September 18, 2006. For Mid-Rivers Cellular's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. In
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2451A1.html
  • of six thousand dollars ($6,000). We also admonish ASTCA for failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two handset models that meet the hearing aid compatibility requirements for radio frequency interference and two handset models that meet the hearing aid compatibility requirements for inductive coupling capability by the compliance deadlines in apparent violation of former Sections 20.19(c)(2)(i)(B)(1) and 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). II. BACKGROUND 2. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of individuals with hearing disabilities to access digital wireless telecommunications. The Commission established technical standards that digital wireless handsets must meet to be considered compatible with hearing aids operating in acoustic coupling and inductive
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-463A1.html
  • No. 200832100017 Communications ) FRN # 0007435902 ) Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: February 26, 2008 Released: February 27, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that AST Telecom, LLC d/b/a Blue Sky Communications ("Blue Sky") apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by September 18, 2006. For Blue Sky's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of fifteen thousand hundred dollars ($15,000). II. BACKGROUND 2.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-535A1.html
  • Inc. ) FRN # 0005769302 ) Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: March 7, 2008 Released: March 11, 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that CTC Telecom, Inc. ("CTC"), a Code Division Multiple Access-based ("CDMA-based") carrier serving rural Idaho, apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by September 18, 2006. For CTC's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of thirty thousand dollars ($30,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. In the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-537A1.html
  • ) ) ORDER Adopted: March 17, 2008 Released: March 19, 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Pine Telephone Company, Inc. d/b/a Pine Cellular Phones, Inc. ("Pine"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Pine for possible violations of section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") regarding the inductive coupling hearing aid compatibility requirements and an investigation and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture against Pine for possible violations of section 20.19(f) of the Rules regarding the hearing aid compatibility labeling requirements. 2. The Bureau and Pine have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve these matters. A copy
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-555A1.html
  • Luis Obispo ) FRN # 0001650324 ) Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: March 12, 2008 Released: March 13, 2008 By the Deputy Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that SLO Cellular, Inc. d/b/a Cellular One of San Luis Obispo ("SLO Cellular") apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Sections 20.19(c)(2)(i)(B)(1) and 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models that meet the radio frequency interference and inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by the applicable deadline. For SLO Cellular's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of forty-five thousand
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-603A1.html
  • 19, 2008 Released: March 20, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that South Slope Cooperative Telephone Company, d/b/a South Slope Wireless ("South Slope"), a Global System for Mobile Communications ("GSM") Tier III carrier serving parts of Iowa, apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by September 18, 2006. For South Slope's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. In
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-610A1.html
  • the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Iowa Wireless Services, LLC dba i wireless ("i wireless"), a Global System for Mobile Communications ("GSM") carrier encompassing 37 associated Personal Communications Services ("PCS") licensees providing service in Iowa and western Illinois, apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by September 18, 2006. For i wireless's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-two thousand five hundred dollars ($22,500). II. BACKGROUND
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-785A1.html
  • April 7, 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Cable & Communications Corporation dba Mid-Rivers Cellular ("Mid-Rivers Cellular"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL") by the Bureau against Mid-Rivers Cellular for possible violation of Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") regarding its failure to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by September 18, 2006. 2. The Bureau and Mid-Rivers Cellular have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-914A1.html
  • LLC ) FRN No. 0004119483 ) ORDER Adopted: May 7, 2008 Released: May 9, 2008 By the Deputy Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Edge Wireless Licenses, LLC ("Edge"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Edge for possible violations of section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") regarding the inductive coupling hearing aid compatibility requirements. 2. The Bureau and Edge have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-920A1.html
  • ) FRN No. 0001766179 ) ORDER Adopted: April 21, 2008 Released: April 23, 2008 By the Deputy Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Alaska DigiTel, LLC ("Alaska DigiTel"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Alaska DigiTel for possible violation of section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") regarding the inductive coupling hearing aid compatibility requirements. 2. The Bureau and Alaska DigiTel have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1025A1.html
  • No. 0001704246 ) ORDER Adopted: May 11, 2009 Released: May 13, 2009 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Panhandle Telecommunication Systems, Inc. ("PTSI"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against PTSI for possible violation of former Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") regarding the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility. 2. The Bureau and PTSI have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1044A1.html
  • and Order, 35 FCC 2d 361 (1972). See Eure, 17 FCC Rcd at 21863-64; Triad Broadcasting Company, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 96 FCC 2d 1235, 1244 (1984). See Corr Wireless Communications, LLC, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 22 FCC Rcd 11567, 11570 (Enf. Bur. Spectrum Enf. Div., 2008) (finding that Corr apparently willfully and repeatedly violated former Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Rules by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by September 18, 2006), response pending. Although Section 504(c) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S: 504(c), prohibits us from relying on the issuance of a prior NAL that has not been paid or
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-1504A1.html
  • July 8, 2009 Released: July 10, 2009 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and CT Cube, Inc. d/b/a West Central Wireless ("CT Cube"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against CT Cube for possible violations of former section 20.19(c)(2)(i)(B)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") regarding the offering of digital wireless handset models that meet the radio frequency interference standard for hearing aid compatibility, and former section 20.19(f) of the Rules regarding the labeling requirements for digital wireless hearing aid-compatible handsets. 2. The Bureau and CT Cube have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-2473A1.html
  • 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we propose a forfeiture of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000) against Smith Bagley, Inc., d/b/a Cellular One of NE Arizona ("SBI"), a Global System for Mobile Communications-based ("GSM-based") Tier III carrier, serving parts of Arizona and New Mexico. As detailed herein, we find that SBI apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(c)(3) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), by failing to timely provide in its digital wireless handset offerings to consumers at least eight handset models that meet the radio frequency interference standards for hearing aid compatibility set forth in Section 20.19(b)(1), or in the alternative, ensure that at least 50% percent of the handset models that it offered to consumers complied with
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-2507A1.html
  • FRN 0005899216 ) Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: November 30, 2009 Released: December 2, 2009 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Apple, Inc. ("Apple") apparently willfully violated the wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in Section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). For this apparent violation, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of five thousand dollars ($5,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of individuals with hearing disabilities to access digital wireless telecommunications. The Commission established technical standards that digital wireless handsets must
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-435A1.html
  • 24, 2009 Released: February 26, 2009 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Long Lines Wireless, LLC d/b/a Long Lines Wireless ("Long Lines"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation of Long Lines by the Bureau for possible violations of former Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") regarding the inductive coupling hearing aid compatibility requirements. 2. The Bureau and Long Lines have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-556A1.html
  • 2009 Released: March 13, 2009 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and PinPoint Wireless, Inc. ("PinPoint"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL") by the Bureau against PinPoint for possible violations of former Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") regarding the inductive coupling hearing aid compatibility requirements. 2. The Bureau and PinPoint have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-1271A1.html
  • FRN No. 0016162539 ) ORDER Adopted: July 9, 2010 Released: July 12, 2010 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Futurewei Technologies, Inc. d/b/a Huawei Technologies (USA) ("Huawei"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Huawei for possible violations of Section 20.19(i) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), regarding compliance with the Commission's regulations pertaining to hearing aid compatibility for wireless handsets. 2. The Bureau and Huawei have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-1321A1.html
  • Date, and twenty-four (24) months after the Effective Date. Each Compliance Report shall include a certification by the Compliance Officer, as an agent of and on behalf of Qomo, stating that the Compliance Officer has personal knowledge that Qomo (i) has established operating procedures intended to ensure compliance with the terms and conditions of this Consent Decree and with section 20.19 of the Rules, together with an accompanying statement explaining the basis for the Compliance Officer's certification; (ii) has been utilizing those procedures since the previous Compliance Report was submitted; and (iii) is not aware of any instances of non-compliance. The certification must comply with section 1.16 of the Rules and be subscribed to as true under penalty of perjury in
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-1654A1.html
  • Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we propose a forfeiture of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000) against Oklahoma Independent RSA 5 Partnership ("Oklahoma Independent"), a Global System for Mobile Communications-based ("GSM-based") Tier III carrier, serving parts of Oklahoma. As detailed herein, we find that Oklahoma Independent apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(c)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"), by failing to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of digital wireless handsets that met or exceeded the radio frequency interference standards for hearing aid compatibility set forth in Section 20.19(b)(1). II. BACKGROUND 2. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of consumers with
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-1657A1.html
  • the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we propose a forfeiture of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000) against TX-10 Licensee, LLC dba Cellular One ("TX-10"), a Global System for Mobile Communications-based ("GSM-based") Tier III carrier, serving parts of Texas. As detailed herein, we find that TX-10 apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(c)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"), by failing to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of digital wireless handsets that met or exceeded the radio frequency interference standards for hearing aid compatibility set forth in Section 20.19(b)(1). II. BACKGROUND 2. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of consumers with
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-1659A1.html
  • the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we propose a forfeiture of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000) against OK-5 Licensee Co., LLC ("OK-5 Licensee"), a Global System for Mobile Communications-based ("GSM-based") Tier III carrier, serving parts of Oklahoma. As detailed herein, we find that OK-5 Licensee apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(c)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"), by failing to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of digital wireless handsets that met or exceeded the radio frequency interference standards for hearing aid compatibility set forth in Section 20.19(b)(1). II. BACKGROUND 2. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of consumers with
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2040A1.html
  • forfeiture Adopted: October 25, 2010 Released: October 26, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Total Call Mobile, Inc. ("TCM"), a reseller of mobile wireless services, apparently willfully violated the wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in Section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated the public web site posting requirements set forth in Section 20.19(h) of the Rules. For these apparent violations, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of twelve thousand dollars ($12,000). We also direct TCM to file the required wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report within thirty (30) days
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2041A1.html
  • forfeiture Adopted: October 25, 2010 Released: October 26, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that IDT Telecom, Inc. ("IDT Telecom"), a reseller of digital wireless services, apparently willfully violated the wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in Section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated the public web site posting requirements set forth in Section 20.19(h) of the Rules. For these apparent violations, we propose a total forfeiture in the amount of twelve thousand dollars ($12,000). We also direct IDT Telecom to file the required wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report within thirty
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2046A1.html
  • 2010 Released: October 26, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that MGA Entertainment, Inc. ("MGA"), a reseller of wireless services through its Bratz Mobile phone offering, apparently willfully violated the wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in Section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). For this apparent violation, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of six thousand dollars ($6,000). We also direct MGA to file the required wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report within thirty (30) days of the release of this NAL. II. BACKGROUND 2. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2049A1.html
  • October 26, 2010 Released: October 26, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Cbeyond Communications, LLC ("Cbeyond") d/b/a Beyond Mobile, a reseller of mobile wireless services, apparently willfully violated the wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in Section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated the public web site posting requirements set forth in Section 20.19(h) of the Rules. For these apparent violations, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of twelve thousand dollars ($12,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2226A1.html
  • forfeiture Adopted: November 22, 2010 Released: November 22, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Lightyear Network Solutions, LLC ("Lightyear"), a reseller of mobile wireless services, apparently willfully violated the wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in Section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated the public web site posting requirements set forth in Section 20.19(h) of the Rules. For these apparent violations, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of twelve thousand dollars ($12,000). We also direct Lightyear to file the required wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report within thirty (30) days
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2250A1.html
  • the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we propose a forfeiture of forty-five thousand dollars ($45,000) against East Buchanan Telephone Cooperative ("East Buchanan"), a Global System for Mobile Communications-based ("GSM-based") Tier III carrier serving parts of Iowa. As detailed herein, we find that East Buchanan apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 20.19(c)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"), by failing to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of digital wireless handsets that met or exceeded the radio frequency interference standards for hearing aid compatibility set forth in section 20.19(b)(1), and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Rules, by failing to offer to consumers the required number or percentage
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2378A1.html
  • Cellular, LLC ) FRN No. 0019130319 ) ORDER Adopted: December 23, 2010 Released: December 27, 2010 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Maximum Communications Cellular, LLC ("MaxCell"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against MaxCell for possible violations of Section 20.19(c)(3)(ii) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") regarding the commercial availability of digital wireless handset models meeting the radio frequency standard for hearing aid compatibility, and for possible violations of Section 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Rules regarding the commercial availability of digital wireless handset models meeting the inductive coupling standard for hearing aid compatibility. 2. The Bureau and MaxCell have negotiated the terms
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2428A1.html
  • 30, 2010 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we propose a forfeiture of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000) against Sandhill Communications ("Sandhill"), a Global System for Mobile Communications-based ("GSM-based") Tier III carrier, serving parts of South Carolina. As detailed herein, we find that Sandhill apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 20.19(c)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"), by failing to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of digital wireless handsets that met or exceeded the radio frequency interference standards for hearing aid compatibility set forth in section 20.19(b)(1) of the Rules. II. BACKGROUND 2. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2435A1.html
  • Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that the Champaign Telephone Company d/b/a CT Communications, Inc., a reseller of mobile wireless services through its operating division, CT Wireless (collectively, "CT Communications"), apparently willfully violated the wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). For this apparent violation, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of six thousand dollars ($6,000). We also direct CT Communications to file the required wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report within thirty (30) days after the release of this NAL. II. BACKGROUND 2. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2436A1.html
  • Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we propose a forfeiture of thirty-nine thousand dollars ($39,000) against Indigo Wireless, Inc. ("Indigo Wireless"), a Global System for Mobile Communications-based ("GSM-based") Tier III carrier serving parts of New York and Pennsylvania. As detailed herein, we find that Indigo Wireless apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 20.19(c)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"), by failing to offer to consumers for nine months the required number or percentage of digital wireless handsets that met or exceeded the radio frequency interference standards for hearing aid compatibility set forth in section 20.19(b)(1) of the Rules. II. BACKGROUND 2. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2439A1.html
  • FRN 0016004731 ) Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: December 30, 2010 Released: December 30, 2010 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that STi Prepaid, LLC, a reseller of wireless services through its operating division, STi Mobile (collectively, "STi Prepaid"), apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 20.19(e)(2) of the Commission's rules ("Rules") by failing for 18 months to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least one handset model that meets the inductive coupling standard for hearing aid compatibility set forth in section 20.19(b)(2) of the Rules. Further, we find that STi Prepaid apparently willfully violated the hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2440A1.html
  • I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we propose a forfeiture of nineteen thousand five hundred dollars ($19,500) against Epic Touch Co., Inc. ("Epic Touch"), a Global System for Mobile Communications-based ("GSM-based") Tier III carrier, serving parts of Kansas and Oklahoma. As detailed herein, we find that Epic Touch apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 20.19(c)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"), by failing to offer to consumers for nine months the required number or percentage of digital wireless handsets that met or exceeded the radio frequency interference standards for hearing aid compatibility set forth in section 20.19(b)(1) of the Rules. II. BACKGROUND 2. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-77A1.html
  • for forfeiture Adopted: January 14, 2010 Released: January 14, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that ACS Wireless, Inc. ("ACSW"), a subsidiary of Alaska Communications Systems, apparently willfully violated the wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in Section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated the public web site posting requirements set forth in Section 20.19(h) of the Rules. For these apparent violations, we propose a total forfeiture in the amount of twelve thousand dollars ($12,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-78A1.html
  • ) Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: January 14, 2010 Released: January 14, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Doro AB ("Doro") apparently willfully and repeatedly violated the wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in Section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). For this apparent violation, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of twelve thousand dollars ($12,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of individuals with hearing disabilities to access digital wireless telecommunications. The Commission established technical standards that digital wireless handsets must
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-79A1.html
  • apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: January 14, 2010 Released: January 14, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that East Kentucky Network, LLC d/b/a Appalachian Wireless ("East Kentucky Network") apparently willfully violated the hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in Section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). For this apparent violation, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of five thousand dollars ($5,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of individuals with hearing disabilities to access digital wireless telecommunications. The Commission established technical standards that digital wireless handsets must
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-80A1.html
  • ) Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: January 14, 2010 Released: January 14, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that ZTE Corporation ("ZTE") apparently willfully and repeatedly violated the wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in Section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") and the public web site posting requirements set forth in Section 20.19(h) of the Rules. For these apparent violations, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of eighteen thousand dollars ($18,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of individuals with hearing disabilities
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-81A1.html
  • subsidiary of TCL Communication ) Technology Holdings Ltd. FRN 0009221672 ) ) Notice OF apparent liability for forfeiture Adopted: January 14, 2010 Released: January 14, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that TCT Mobile Limited ("TCT Mobile") apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), which requires the filing of status reports regarding the hearing aid compatibility of wireless handsets. We also find that TCT Mobile apparently willfully violated a Commission order by failing to respond to a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") from the Enforcement Bureau. Based on our review of facts and circumstances in this matter, we conclude that
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-82A1.html
  • Suite 401 Miami Beach, FL 33139 Re: File No. EB-09-SE-154 Dear Mr. Barutcu: This is an official CITATION, issued to Firefly Mobile Communications, Inc. ("Firefly"), a reseller of wireless services, pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), for violating the digital wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject Firefly to monetary forfeitures. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of individuals with hearing disabilities to access digital wireless telecommunications. The Commission established technical standards that digital wireless handsets must meet
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-83A1.html
  • for forfeiture Adopted: January 14, 2010 Released: January 14, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Locus Telecommunications, Inc. ("Locus"), a reseller of digital wireless services, apparently willfully violated the wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in Section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated the public web site posting requirements set forth in Section 20.19(h) of the Rules. For these apparent violations, we propose a total forfeiture in the amount of twelve thousand dollars ($12,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-84A1.html
  • Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: January 14, 2010 Released: January 14, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Airo Wireless, Inc. ("Airo") apparently willfully and repeatedly violated the wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in Section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). For this apparent violation, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of twelve thousand dollars ($12,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of individuals with hearing disabilities to access digital wireless telecommunications. The Commission established technical standards that digital wireless handsets must
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-85A1.html
  • Support Center, One Arts Plaza 1722 Routh Street, Suite 1000 Dallas, Texas 75201-2506 Re: File No. EB-09-SE-167 Dear Mr. Hennen: This is an official CITATION, issued to 7-Eleven, Inc. ("7-Eleven") pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), for violating the digital wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), and the public web site posting requirements set forth in section 20.19(h) of the Rules. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject 7-Eleven to monetary forfeitures. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of individuals with hearing disabilities to
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-930A1.html
  • Road Suite 300 Portland, Oregon 97224-7574 Re: File No. EB-09-SE-175 Dear Mr. Marick: This is an official CITATION, issued to Consumer Cellular, Inc. ("Consumer Cellular"), a reseller of wireless services, pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), for violating the digital wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject Consumer Cellular to monetary forfeitures. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of individuals with hearing disabilities to access digital wireless telecommunications. The Commission established technical standards that digital wireless handsets must
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-931A1.html
  • Road Bloomfield Hills, Michigan 48302-0336 Re: File No. EB-09-SE-168 Dear Mr. Bahri: This is an official CITATION issued to Air Voice Wireless, LLC ("Air Voice"), a reseller of wireless services, pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), for violating the digital wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), and the public web site posting requirements set forth in section 20.19(h) of the Rules. We also find that Air Voice violated a Commission order by failing to respond to a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") from the Enforcement Bureau. As explained below, continued violations of the Commission's rules and the Act in this regard will
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-932A1.html
  • Owner eCallPlus 1523 N. Oakmont Drive Vernon Hills, Illinois 60061 Re: File No. EB-09-SE-173 Dear Ms. Kang: This is an official CITATION, issued to eCallPlus, a reseller of wireless services, pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), for violating the digital wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject eCall to monetary forfeitures. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of individuals with hearing disabilities to access digital wireless telecommunications. The Commission established technical standards that digital wireless handsets must meet
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-933A1.html
  • Box 52085 Phoenix, Arizona 85072-2085 Re: File No. EB-09-SE-174 Dear Mr. O'Toole: This is an official CITATION issued to Circle K Stores, Inc. ("Circle K"), a reseller of wireless services, pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), for violating the digital wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject Circle K to monetary forfeitures. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of individuals with hearing disabilities to access digital wireless telecommunications. The Commission established technical standards that digital wireless handsets must
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-934A1.html
  • Parklawn Drive, Suite U Rockville MD 20852 Re: File No. EB-09-SE-182 Dear Sir or Madam: This is an official CITATION issued to Movida Cellular ("Movida"), a reseller of wireless services, pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), for violating the digital wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's rules ("rules"), and the public web site posting requirements set forth in section 20.19(h) of the rules. We also find that Movida violated a Commission order by failing to respond to an Enforcement Bureau Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") directing Movida to provide certain information and documents concerning its compliance with the digital wireless handset hearing aid compatibility
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-935A1.html
  • Dr. #310 San Diego, CA 92130-2004 Re: File No. EB-09-SE-177 Dear Ms. Herrick: This is an official CITATION issued to GreatCall, Inc., d/b/a Jitterbug ("Jitterbug"), a reseller of wireless services, pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), for violating the digital wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject Jitterbug to monetary forfeitures. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of individuals with hearing disabilities to access digital wireless telecommunications. The Commission established technical standards that digital wireless handsets must meet
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-937A1.html
  • Parklawn Drive, Suite U Rockville MD 20852 Re: File No. EB-09-SE-179 Dear Sir or Madam: This is an official CITATION issued to Liberty Wireless ("Liberty"), a reseller of wireless services, pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), for violating the digital wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's rules ("rules"), and the public web site posting requirements set forth in section 20.19(h) of the rules. We also find that Liberty violated a Commission order by failing to respond to an Enforcement Bureau Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") directing Liberty to provide certain information and documents concerning its compliance with the digital wireless handset hearing aid compatibility
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-938A1.html
  • 8108 S. Roberts Road Justice, Illinois 60458 Re: File No. EB-09-SE-185 Dear Mr. Ahmad: This is an official CITATION, issued to PlatinumTel Communications, LLC ("PlatinumTel"), a reseller of wireless services, pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), for violating the digital wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), and the public web site posting requirements set forth in section 20.19(h) of the Rules. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject PlatinumTel to monetary forfeitures. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of individuals with hearing disabilities to
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011.html
  • > [12]EB > Orders [13]site map Search the FCC: _______________ Submit [14]Help | [15]Advanced | [16]Share [17]2012 Orders [18]2010 Orders [19]2009 Orders [20]2008 Orders [21]2007 Orders [22]2006 Orders [23]2005 Orders [24]2004 Orders [25]2003 Orders [26]2002 Orders [27]2001 Orders [28]2000 Orders [29]1999 Orders 12-30-2011 ORDER [30]Certain Notices of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Citations Issued for Violations of 47 C.F.R. S: 20.19(h) and 47 C.F.R. S: 20.19(i) 12-29-2011 NAL [31]Metropolitan Telecommunications Holding Company d.b.a. MetTel 12-29-2011 NAL [32]Locus Telecommunications, Inc. 12-29-2011 NAL [33]Centennial Communications Corporation, wholly-owned subsidiary of AT&T, Inc. 12-28-2011 NAL [34]NEP Cellcorp, Inc. 12-28-2011 NAL [35]Maximum Communications Cellular, LLC 12-28-2011 NAL [36]General Communication, Inc. 12-23-2011 NAL [37]iSmart Mobile, LLC d/b/a Big Sky Mobile 12-23-2011 NAL [38]North Central Wireless LC d/b/a
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1002A1.html
  • Bell Wireless LLC ) FRN: 0003010493 ) ) ORDER Adopted: June 9, 2011 Released: June 9, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Cincinnati Bell Wireless LLC ("CBW"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Bureau regarding CBW's compliance with section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's rules pertaining to the deployment of digital wireless hearing aid-compatible handsets. 2. The Bureau and CBW have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1641A1.html
  • Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we propose a forfeiture of nineteen thousand five hundred dollars ($19,500) against Kaplan Telephone Company, Inc. d/b/a Pace Communications ("Pace"), a Global System for Mobile Communications-based ("GSM-based") Tier III carrier, serving Vermilion Parish, Louisiana. As detailed herein, we find that Pace apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules ("Rules") by failing to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of digital wireless handset models that met or exceeded the radio frequency interference standards for hearing aid compatibility set forth in section 20.19(b)(1) of the Rules, and that this apparent misconduct continued for seven consecutive months in 2010. II. BACKGROUND 2. In the 2003
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1809A1.html
  • October 28, 2011 Released: October 28, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we propose a forfeiture in the amount of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) against Keystone Wireless, LLC d.b.a. Immix Wireless ("Keystone Wireless"). As detailed herein, we find that Keystone Wireless apparently willfully and repeatedly violated sections 20.19(c)(3)(ii) and 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). We further find that some of the apparent misconduct continued for more than 11 of the 12 months in the reporting period. Specifically, Keystone Wireless apparently failed to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset models as set forth in the Rules. These hearing aid compatibility
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1812A1.html
  • 28, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we propose a forfeiture in the amount of eighty two thousand five hundred dollars ($82,500) against Missouri RSA 5 Partnership d/b/a Chariton Valley Wireless Services ("Chariton Valley"). As detailed herein, we find that Chariton Valley apparently willfully and repeatedly violated sections 20.19(c)(3)(ii) and 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). We further find that some of the apparent misconduct continued for 10 of the 12 months in the 2010 reporting period. Specifically, Chariton Valley apparently failed to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset models as set forth in the Rules. The hearing aid compatibility requirements
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1844A1.html
  • Inc. ) FRN: 0004334538 ) ORDER Adopted: November 8, 2011 Released: November 9, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") of the Federal Communications Commission and OTZ Telecommunications, Inc. ("OTZ"). The Consent Decree resolves and terminates the Bureau's investigation into OTZ's compliance with section 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules concerning the deployment of digital wireless hearing aid-compatible handsets. These hearing aid compatibility requirements serve to ensure that consumers with hearing loss have access to advanced telecommunications services. 2. The Bureau and OTZ have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1973A1.html
  • Adopted: December 14, 2011 Released: December 14, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") of the Federal Communications Commission and Cross Wireless, L.L.C. d/b/a Sprocket Wireless, L.L.C. ("Cross Wireless"). The Consent Decree resolves and terminates the Bureau's investigation into Cross Wireless's compliance with sections 20.19(c)(3)(ii) and 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules concerning the deployment of digital wireless hearing aid-compatible handsets. These hearing aid compatibility requirements serve to ensure that consumers with hearing loss have access to advanced telecommunications services. 2. The Bureau and Cross Wireless have negotiated the Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-2034A1.html
  • December 23, 2011 Released: December 23, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we propose a forfeiture in the amount of thirty-nine thousand dollars ($39,000) against North Central Wireless LC d/b/a i wireless ("North Central"). As detailed herein, we find that North Central apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). We further find that the apparent misconduct continued for seven consecutive months during the 2010 reporting period. Specifically, North Central apparently failed to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset models as set forth in the Rules. These hearing aid compatibility requirements serve to ensure that consumers with
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-2035A1.html
  • for forfeiture Adopted: December 23, 2011 Released: December 23, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we propose a forfeiture in the amount of thirty thousand dollars ($30,000) against Affordable Phone Services, Inc. ("Affordable Phone"). As detailed herein, we find that Affordable Phone apparently willfully and repeatedly violated sections 20.19(c)(3)(ii) and 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). Specifically, Affordable Phone apparently failed to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset models as set forth in the Rules. These hearing aid compatibility requirements serve to ensure that consumers with hearing loss have access to advanced telecommunications services. II. BACKGROUND 2. In the 2003 Hearing
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-2042A1.html
  • Released: December 23, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Admonishment ("NAL"), we propose a forfeiture in the amount of thirty thousand dollars ($30,000) and issue an admonishment against Airadigm Communications, Inc. dba Airfire Wireless ("Airadigm"). As detailed herein, we find that Airadigm apparently willfully and repeatedly violated sections 20.19(c)(3)(ii) and 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). Specifically, Airadigm apparently failed to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset models as set forth in the Rules. These hearing aid compatibility requirements serve to ensure that consumers with hearing loss have access to advanced telecommunications services. II. BACKGROUND 2. In the 2003 Hearing Aid
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-2060A1.html
  • Adopted: December 23, 2011 Released: December 23, 2011 By the Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we propose a forfeiture in the amount of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000) against Caprock Cellular Limited Partnership ("Caprock"). As detailed herein, we find that Caprock apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 20.19(c)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). Specifically, Caprock apparently failed to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset models as set forth in the Rules. These hearing aid compatibility requirements serve to ensure that consumers with hearing loss have access to advanced telecommunications services. II. BACKGROUND 2. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-2061A1.html
  • December 23, 2011 By the Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we propose a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-one thousand dollars ($21,000) against iSmart Mobile, LLC d/b/a Big Sky Mobile ("Big Sky"). As detailed herein, we find that Big Sky apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 20.19(c)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). We further find that the apparent misconduct continued for the entire 2010 calendar year. Specifically, Big Sky apparently failed to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset models as set forth in the Rules. These hearing aid compatibility requirements serve to ensure that consumers with hearing loss have
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-2075A1.html
  • of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: December 28, 2011 Released: December 28, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we propose a forfeiture in the amount of fifty-one thousand dollars ($51,000) against General Communication, Inc. ("GCI"). As detailed herein, we find that GCI apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). We further find that this apparent misconduct continued for seven consecutive months during the 2010 calendar year. Specifically, GCI apparently failed to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset models that operate on the GSM air interface as set forth in the Rules. These hearing aid compatibility requirements
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-2076A1.html
  • of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: December 28, 2011 Released: December 29, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we propose a forfeiture in the amount of seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000) against Centennial Communications Corporation ("Centennial"). As detailed herein, we find that Centennial apparently willfully and repeatedly violated sections 20.19(d)(3)(ii) and 20.19(e)(2) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). Specifically, Centennial apparently failed to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset models that operate on the GSM and WCDMA air interfaces as set forth in the Rules. These hearing aid compatibility requirements serve to ensure that consumers with hearing loss have access to advanced telecommunications
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-2077A1.html
  • for forfeiture Adopted: December 29, 2011 Released: December 29, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we propose a forfeiture in the amount of forty-eight thousand dollars ($48,000) against Metropolitan Telecommunications Holding Company d.b.a. MetTel ("Metropolitan"). As detailed herein, we find that Metropolitan apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). We further find that this apparent misconduct continued for the entire 2010 calendar year. Specifically, Metropolitan apparently failed to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset models that operate on the WCDMA and GSM air interfaces as set forth in the Rules. These hearing aid compatibility requirements serve
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-2078A1.html
  • 28, 2011 Released: December 29, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Admonishment, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand five hundred dollars ($25,500) and issue an admonishment against Locus Telecommunications, Inc. ("Locus"). As detailed herein, we find that Locus apparently willfully and repeatedly violated sections 20.19(c)(3)(ii) and 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). We further find that some of this apparent misconduct continued for the entire 2010 calendar year. Specifically, Locus apparently failed to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset models that operate on the GSM air interface as set forth in the Rules. These hearing aid compatibility
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-2079A1.html
  • Liability for forfeiture Adopted: December 28, 2011 Released: December 28, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we propose a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand five hundred dollars ($25,500) against NEP Cellcorp, Inc. ("NEP"). As detailed herein, we find that NEP apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 20.19(c)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). We further find that this apparent misconduct continued for five consecutive months during the 2010 calendar year. Specifically, NEP apparently failed to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset models as set forth in the Rules. These hearing aid compatibility requirements serve to ensure that consumers with hearing
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-2080A1.html
  • apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: December 28, 2011 Released: December 28, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we propose a forfeiture in the amount of thirty thousand dollars ($30,000) against Maximum Communications Cellular, LLC ("MaxCell"). As detailed herein, we find that MaxCell apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 20.19(c)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). Specifically, MaxCell apparently failed to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset models that operate on the GSM and WCDMA air interfaces as set forth in the Rules. These hearing aid compatibility requirements serve to ensure that consumers with hearing loss have access to advanced telecommunications services. II.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-257A1.html
  • Adopted: February 17, 2011 Released: February 17, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Pantech Co., Ltd. and its wholly owned U.S.-based subsidiary, Pantech Wireless, Inc. (together "Pantech"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Bureau regarding Pantech's compliance with sections 20.19(h) and (i) of the Commission's rules concerning the wireless handset hearing aid compatibility web site posting and hearing aid compatibility status reporting requirements, and sections 20.19(c)(1) and (d)(1) of the Commission's rules pertaining to the hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset deployment requirements. 2. The Bureau and Pantech have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve this matter.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-3A1.html
  • 19, 2011 By the Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and ACS Wireless, Inc. ("ACSW"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau and cancels the Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL") issued against ACSW for possible violations of Sections 20.19 (h) and (i)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), regarding compliance with the Commission's regulations pertaining to hearing aid compatibility for wireless handsets. 2. The Bureau and ACSW have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-802A1.html
  • corrective measures are not sufficient to avoid enforcement action."). Forfeiture Order, 2011 WL 742240, at *3, para. 8. See e.g., Champaign Tel. Co. D/B/A CT Commc'ns, Inc., Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 25 FCC Rcd 17814, 17818-19, para. 9 (Spec. Enf. Div. 2010) (construing a failure to file the hearing aid compatibility status report required under section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's rules as "a continuing violation that continues until . . . cured"); STI Prepaid, 25 FCC Rcd at 17845, para. 20 (same); Lightyear Network Solutions, LLC, Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 25 FCC Rcd 16212, 16217, para. 12 (Spec. Enf. Div. 2010) (same); Alpheus Commc'ns, LP, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 25 FCC
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2012/DA-12-285A1.html
  • 0005599634 ) ORDER Adopted: February 27, 2012 Released: February 27, 2012 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (Bureau) of the Federal Communications Commission and Epic Touch Co., Inc. (Epic Touch). The Consent Decree resolves and terminates the Bureau's investigation into Epic Touch's compliance with Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's rules (Rules) concerning the deployment of digital wireless hearing aid-compatible handsets. The hearing aid compatibility requirements serve to ensure that consumers with hearing loss have access to advanced telecommunications services. 2. The Bureau and Epic Touch have negotiated the Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2012/DA-12-628A1.html
  • FRN: 0010723591 ) ) ORDER Adopted: May 11, 2012 Released: May 11, 2012 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (Bureau) of the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) and Ztar Mobile, Inc. (Ztar). The Consent Decree resolves and terminates the Bureau's investigations into Ztar's compliance with Section 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules (Rules) concerning the deployment of digital wireless hearing aid-compatible handsets and with Section 222 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the Act), Section 64.2009(e) of the Rules, and the EPIC CPNI Order, concerning the filing of an annual Customer Proprietary Network Information certification. 2. The Bureau and Ztar have negotiated the Consent Decree that
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2012/FCC-12-39A1.html
  • NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE Adopted: April 13, 2012 Released: April 13, 2012 By the Commission: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of eight hundred nineteen thousand dollars ($819,000) against T-Mobile USA, Inc. (T-Mobile). As detailed herein, we find that T-Mobile apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Sections 20.19(c)(2) and 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's rules (Rules). We further find that this apparent misconduct persisted for the two-year period, 2009-2010. Specifically, T-Mobile, a nationwide wireless carrier with more than 33 million customers and more than $21 billion dollars in annual revenue, apparently failed to offer the required number of hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset models as set forth in the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-10-93A1.html
  • joann.lucanik@fcc.gov of the Enforcement Bureau. For general information on the wireless hearing aid compatibility rules, contact Michael Rowan, (202) 418-1883, Michael.Rowan@fcc.gov, or Weiren Wang, (202) 418-7275, Weiren.Wang@fcc.gov. Media inquiries should be directed to David Fiske, david.fiske@fcc.gov, (202) 418-0513. Issued by: Chief, Enforcement Bureau -FCC- The full text of the hearing aid compatibility rules is set forth at 47 C.F.R. S: 20.19. These rules include technical standards that digital wireless handsets must meet to be considered compatible with hearing aids operating in acoustic coupling and inductive coupling (telecoil) modes, and establish deadlines by which manufacturers and wireless service providers, including resellers and Mobile Virtual Network Operators, are required to offer specified numbers or percentages of handsets per air interface that comply with
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/index.htm
  • http://search2.fcc.gov/search/index.htm?job=search_tips 11. http://search2.fcc.gov/search/index.htm?job=advanced_search 12. http://addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&pub=fccdotgov 13. http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/index.htm?job=home#skipnav 14. http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/index.htm?job=reports_dm 15. http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/index.htm?job=reports_sp 16. https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsEntry/licManager/login.jsp 17. http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/index.htm?job=home#skipnav 18. http://www.fcc.gov/ 19. http://wireless.fcc.gov/ 20. http://www.fcc.gov/fccsitemap.html 21. http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/index.htm?job=home#d36e2 22. http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/index.htm?job=home#d36e86 23. http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/index.htm?job=home#d36e109 24. http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/index.htm?job=home#d36e118 25. http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/index.htm?job=home#top 26. https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsEntry/licManager/login.jsp 27. http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/FCCForm655Instructions.pdf 28. https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/coresWeb/publicHome.do 29. http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/index.htm?job=home#top 30. http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/index.htm?job=reports_dm 31. http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/index.htm?job=reports_sp 32. http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/index.htm?job=home#top 33. http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/index.htm?job=home#top 34. http://wireless.fcc.gov/presentations/form655-deployment-demo.html 35. http://wireless.fcc.gov/presentations/form655-deployment-demo2.html 36. http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/index.htm?job=home#top 37. http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/consumerfacts/hac_wireless.html 38. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309125A1.pdf 39. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313049A1.pdf 40. http://wireless.fcc.gov/cgi-bin/wtbbye.pl?http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/cfr_2009/octqtr/pdf/47cfr20.19.pdf 41. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-145A1.pdf 42. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-145A1.doc 43. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300703A1.pdf 44. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300703A1.doc 45. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2476A1.pdf 46. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2476A1.doc 47. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1298A1.pdf 48. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1298A1.doc 49. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1128A1.pdf 50. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1128A1.doc 51. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-68A1.pdf 52. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-68A1.doc 53. http://transition.fcc.gov/ 54. http://www.fcc.gov/searchtools.html 55. http://www.fcc.gov/rss/ 56. http://www.fcc.gov/releases.html 57. http://www.fcc.gov/e-file/ 58. http://www.fcc.gov/major.html 59. http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/consumers.html 60. http://www.fcc.gov/people.html 61. http://esupport.fcc.gov/topics.htm 62. https://esupport.fcc.gov/password.htm 63. https://esupport.fcc.gov/request.htm 64. http://www.fcc.gov/contact.html 65. mailto:fccinfo@fcc.gov 66. http://www.fcc.gov/fccprivacypolicy.html 67. http://www.fcc.gov/webpolicies.html 68. http://www.fcc.gov/plug-ins.html 69. http://www.fcc.gov/foia/ Hidden links:
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/index.htm?&job=home
  • http://search2.fcc.gov/search/index.htm?job=search_tips 11. http://search2.fcc.gov/search/index.htm?job=advanced_search 12. http://addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&pub=fccdotgov 13. http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/index.htm?&job=home#skipnav 14. http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/index.htm?job=reports_dm 15. http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/index.htm?job=reports_sp 16. https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsEntry/licManager/login.jsp 17. http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/index.htm?&job=home#skipnav 18. http://www.fcc.gov/ 19. http://wireless.fcc.gov/ 20. http://www.fcc.gov/fccsitemap.html 21. http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/index.htm?&job=home#d36e2 22. http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/index.htm?&job=home#d36e86 23. http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/index.htm?&job=home#d36e109 24. http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/index.htm?&job=home#d36e118 25. http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/index.htm?&job=home#top 26. https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsEntry/licManager/login.jsp 27. http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/FCCForm655Instructions.pdf 28. https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/coresWeb/publicHome.do 29. http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/index.htm?&job=home#top 30. http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/index.htm?job=reports_dm 31. http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/index.htm?job=reports_sp 32. http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/index.htm?&job=home#top 33. http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/index.htm?&job=home#top 34. http://wireless.fcc.gov/presentations/form655-deployment-demo.html 35. http://wireless.fcc.gov/presentations/form655-deployment-demo2.html 36. http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/index.htm?&job=home#top 37. http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/consumerfacts/hac_wireless.html 38. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309125A1.pdf 39. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313049A1.pdf 40. http://wireless.fcc.gov/cgi-bin/wtbbye.pl?http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/cfr_2009/octqtr/pdf/47cfr20.19.pdf 41. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-145A1.pdf 42. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-145A1.doc 43. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300703A1.pdf 44. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300703A1.doc 45. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2476A1.pdf 46. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2476A1.doc 47. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1298A1.pdf 48. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1298A1.doc 49. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1128A1.pdf 50. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1128A1.doc 51. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-68A1.pdf 52. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-68A1.doc 53. http://transition.fcc.gov/ 54. http://www.fcc.gov/searchtools.html 55. http://www.fcc.gov/rss/ 56. http://www.fcc.gov/releases.html 57. http://www.fcc.gov/e-file/ 58. http://www.fcc.gov/major.html 59. http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/consumers.html 60. http://www.fcc.gov/people.html 61. http://esupport.fcc.gov/topics.htm 62. https://esupport.fcc.gov/password.htm 63. https://esupport.fcc.gov/request.htm 64. http://www.fcc.gov/contact.html 65. mailto:fccinfo@fcc.gov 66. http://www.fcc.gov/fccprivacypolicy.html 67. http://www.fcc.gov/webpolicies.html 68. http://www.fcc.gov/plug-ins.html 69. http://www.fcc.gov/foia/ Hidden links:
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/index.htm?job=home
  • http://search2.fcc.gov/search/index.htm?job=search_tips 11. http://search2.fcc.gov/search/index.htm?job=advanced_search 12. http://addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&pub=fccdotgov 13. http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/index.htm?job=home#skipnav 14. http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/index.htm?job=reports_dm 15. http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/index.htm?job=reports_sp 16. https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsEntry/licManager/login.jsp 17. http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/index.htm?job=home#skipnav 18. http://www.fcc.gov/ 19. http://wireless.fcc.gov/ 20. http://www.fcc.gov/fccsitemap.html 21. http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/index.htm?job=home#d36e2 22. http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/index.htm?job=home#d36e86 23. http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/index.htm?job=home#d36e109 24. http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/index.htm?job=home#d36e118 25. http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/index.htm?job=home#top 26. https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsEntry/licManager/login.jsp 27. http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/FCCForm655Instructions.pdf 28. https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/coresWeb/publicHome.do 29. http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/index.htm?job=home#top 30. http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/index.htm?job=reports_dm 31. http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/index.htm?job=reports_sp 32. http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/index.htm?job=home#top 33. http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/index.htm?job=home#top 34. http://wireless.fcc.gov/presentations/form655-deployment-demo.html 35. http://wireless.fcc.gov/presentations/form655-deployment-demo2.html 36. http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac/index.htm?job=home#top 37. http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/consumerfacts/hac_wireless.html 38. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309125A1.pdf 39. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313049A1.pdf 40. http://wireless.fcc.gov/cgi-bin/wtbbye.pl?http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/cfr_2009/octqtr/pdf/47cfr20.19.pdf 41. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-145A1.pdf 42. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-145A1.doc 43. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300703A1.pdf 44. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300703A1.doc 45. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2476A1.pdf 46. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2476A1.doc 47. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1298A1.pdf 48. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1298A1.doc 49. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1128A1.pdf 50. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1128A1.doc 51. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-68A1.pdf 52. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-68A1.doc 53. http://transition.fcc.gov/ 54. http://www.fcc.gov/searchtools.html 55. http://www.fcc.gov/rss/ 56. http://www.fcc.gov/releases.html 57. http://www.fcc.gov/e-file/ 58. http://www.fcc.gov/major.html 59. http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/consumers.html 60. http://www.fcc.gov/people.html 61. http://esupport.fcc.gov/topics.htm 62. https://esupport.fcc.gov/password.htm 63. https://esupport.fcc.gov/request.htm 64. http://www.fcc.gov/contact.html 65. mailto:fccinfo@fcc.gov 66. http://www.fcc.gov/fccprivacypolicy.html 67. http://www.fcc.gov/webpolicies.html 68. http://www.fcc.gov/plug-ins.html 69. http://www.fcc.gov/foia/ Hidden links:
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/100317/Airwave%20Wireless,%20LL_88.PDF
  • Wireless, LLC ("the Company") is a small rural CMRS service provider with operations that utilize the GSM air interface in the State of South Dakota. As noted above, the Company operates CMRS facilities but it currently offers two or fewer wireless handset models to the public. As such, the Company qualifies for the de minimis exception set forth in Section 20.19(e) of the Commission's Rules. Consumer Outreach Describe consumer outreach efforts in the past 12 months: While the Company is currently exempt from the Commission's HAC rules, it has undertaken outreach efforts through the preparation of a detailed Hearing Aid Compatibility Information Sheet that will make available to customers that use hearing aids and others who have questions on the subject.
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/100317/Blanca%20telephone%20Com_13.PDF
  • effective disclosure that the handset has not been tested for hearing aid compatibility with respect to its Wi-Fi voice operation? Yes Explain: Public Website Does your company maintain a public website describing all hearing aid-compatible models, the ratings of those models, and an explanation of the rating system? No Website address: Explain: De minimis service providers are exempted from Section 20.19 HAC requirements via subsection 20.19(e). Page1 of 3 FCC Form 655 June 2009 Reference Copy Consumer Outreach Describe consumer outreach efforts in the past 12 months: De minimis service providers are exempted from Section 20.19 HAC requirements via subsection 20.19(e). Methodology for Functionality Levels De minimis service providers are exempted from Section 20.19 HAC requirements via subsection 20.19(e). Report Remarks
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/100317/CCM%20Wireless,%20Inc._227.PDF
  • model is described by its capabilities regarding features and functionalities. Basic handsets- Entry level handsets that are offered for low cost or free. Featured handsets- Handsets with more advanced capabilities. Smartphone/PDA - Handsets that run complete operating system software as a platform for application developers. Report Remarks Product Labeling: All compliant handsets were labeled in accordance with 47 C.F.R. § 20.19 (f) requirements except the following: Sony Ericsson Z310 ­ Boxes are not labeled. Company refuses to send labels. Inserts are included in the boxes. Sony Ericsson W580 ­ Boxes are not labeled. Company refuses to send labels. Inserts are included in the boxes. Clarity Life C900 ­ Boxes are not labeled. Company refused to send labels. Inserts are included in
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/100317/Consolidated%20Telcom_168.PDF
  • handset has not been tested for hearing aid compatibility with respect to its Wi-Fi voice operation? No Explain: Public Website Does your company maintain a public website describing all hearing aid-compatible models, the ratings of those models, and an explanation of the rating system? No Website address: Explain: Consolidated Telcom qualifies for the de minimis exception set forth in Section 20.19(e) of the Commission's Rules. It does not offer any hearing-aid-compatible handsets. Consumer Outreach Describe consumer outreach efforts in the past 12 months: N/A Methodology for Functionality Levels N/A Report Remarks Handset Maker Handset 1: Motorola Timeport 260 Motorola Handset Model Name FCC ID Timeport 260 IHDT6ZD1 Air Interfaces/Frequency Bands 1900 MHz GSM Is this handset capable of Wi-Fi voice operations?
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/100317/Denali%20Spectrum%20Lice_207.PDF
  • Describe consumer outreach efforts in the past 12 months: In addition to providing information on the website listed on this form, Denali makes its sales personnel aware of the Commission's hearing aid compatibility requirements, as well as the compatible handsets Denali offers. Denali makes its compatible handsets available to customers for testing in Denali's retail stores, as required by Section 20.19(c)(4)(i) of the Commission's rules. Methodology for Functionality Levels Denali offers handsets with a wide range of features and capabilities, and at varying price points. Because Denali is a Tier III carrier, however, the number of handsets that Denali offers is not large enough to justify marketing its handsets based on levels of functionality. For example, Denali does not currently offer
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/100317/Farmers%20Mutual%20Coope_160.PDF
  • Public Website Does your company maintain a public website describing all hearing aid-compatible models, the ratings of those models, and an explanation of the rating system? No Website address: Explain: Service provider is a de minimis service provider and is not required to comply with HAC requirements Page1 of 3 FCC Form 655 June 2009 Reference Copy pursuant to Section 20.19(e). Consumer Outreach Describe consumer outreach efforts in the past 12 months: Service provider is a de minimis service provider and is not required to comply with HAC requirements pursuant to Section 20.19(e). Methodology for Functionality Levels Service provider is a de minimis service provider and is not required to comply with HAC requirements pursuant to Section 20.19(e). Report Remarks Handset
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/100317/GW%20Wireless,%20Inc._89.PDF
  • tested for hearing aid compatibility with respect to its Wi-Fi voice operation? Yes Explain: Public Website Does your company maintain a public website describing all hearing aid-compatible models, the ratings of those models, and an explanation of the rating system? No Website address: Explain: * Not Applicable. The Company qualifies for the HAC de minimis exception set forth in Section 20.19(e) of the Commission's Rules. Consumer Outreach Describe consumer outreach efforts in the past 12 months: While the Company is currently exempt from the Commission's HAC rules, it has undertaken outreach efforts through the preparation of a detailed Hearing Aid Compatibility Information Sheet that will make available to customers that use hearing aids and others who have questions on the subject.
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/100317/GreatCall,%20Inc._125.PDF
  • the handset has not been tested for hearing aid compatibility with respect to its Wi-Fi voice operation? No Explain: Public Website Does your company maintain a public website describing all hearing aid-compatible models, the ratings of those models, and an explanation of the rating system? No Website address: Explain: Because GreatCall qualifies for the de minimus exception set forth in 20.19(e) of the Commission's rules Page1 of 3 FCC Form 655 June 2009 Reference Copy as a service provider that offers "two or fewer digital wireless handsets in an air interface in the United States", it is not subject to the HAC requirements set forth in Section 20.19 of the Commission's rules. Nonetheless, it does provide on its website the HAC
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/100317/Hamilton%20County%20Wire_215.PDF
  • the State of Iowa. The company provides its service in conjunction with Iowa Wireless Services d/b/a iwireless. The Company operates CMRS facilities but it does not currently have any subscribers, it does not have retail outlets and it does not offer wireless handsets to the public. As such, the Company qualifies for the de minimis exception set forth in Section 20.19 (e) of the Commission's Rules. Do all hearing aid-compatible handsets with the Wi-Fi air interface have clear and effective disclosure that the handset has not been tested for hearing aid compatibility with respect to its Wi-Fi voice operation? No Explain: Not applicable. The Company does not offer wireless handsets to the public and it qualifies for the de minimis exception.
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/100317/IT&E%20Overseas,%20Inc._176.PDF
  • hearing aid compatibility with respect to its Wi-Fi voice operation? Yes Explain: Public Website Does your company maintain a public website describing all hearing aid-compatible models, the ratings of those models, and an explanation of the rating system? No Website address: Explain: Not applicable. The Filer offered only two handsets for each air interface and, therefore, qualifies for the Rule 20.19(e) de minimis exception. Consumer Outreach Describe consumer outreach efforts in the past 12 months: Not applicable. The Filer offered only two handsets for each air interface and, therefore, qualifies for the Rule 20.19(e) de minimis exception. Methodology for Functionality Levels Feature Phones: Devices with more advanced features and capibilities. Report Remarks The Filer offered only two handsets for each air
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/100317/LCW%20Wireless%20License_199.PDF
  • the LCW handset line-up mirrors the Cricket handset line-up. In addition to providing information on the Cricket and LCW websites (mycricketoregon) regarding HAC handset models, Cricket sales personnel have been made aware of the HAC requirements and the HAC handsets offered by Cricket. Cricket makes HAC handsets available to customers for testing in its retail stores, as required by Section 20.19(c)(4)(i) of the FCC's rules. Methodology for Functionality Levels Cricket offers handsets with a wide range of features and capabilities, and at varying price points. Because LCW and its partner Cricket are not Tier I carriers, however, the number of handsets LCW offers is not large enough to justify marketing based on levels of functionality. For instance, unlike some Tier 1
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/100317/Leap%20Wireless%20Intern_69.PDF
  • http://www.mycricket.com/features-and-downloads/phone-compatibility Explain: Consumer Outreach Describe consumer outreach efforts in the past 12 months: In addition to providing information on its website regarding HAC handset models, Cricket sales personnel have been made aware of the HAC requirements and the HAC handsets offered by Cricket. Cricket makes HAC handsets available to customers for testing in its retail stores, as required by Section 20.19(c)(4)(i) of the FCC's rules. Methodology for Functionality Levels Cricket offers handsets with a wide range of features and capabilities, and at varying price points. Because Cricket is a Tier II carrier, however, the number of handsets that it offers is not large enough to justify marketing its handsets based on levels of functionality. For instance, unlike some Tier I carriers,
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/100317/Lehigh%20Valley%20Cooper_216.PDF
  • Iowa. The Company provides its service in conjunction with Iowa Wireless Services d/b/a iwireless. As noted above, the Company operates CMRS facilities but it does not currently have any subscribers, it does not have retail outlets and it does not offer wireless handsets to the public. As such, the Company qualifies for the de minimis exception set forth in Section 20.19(e) of the Commission's Rules. Do all hearing aid-compatible handsets with the Wi-Fi air interface have clear and effective disclosure that the handset has not been tested for hearing aid compatibility with respect to its Wi-Fi voice operation? No Explain: Not applicable. The Company does not offer wireless handsets to the public and it qualifies for the de minimis exception. Public
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/100317/MTA%20Communications,%20_42.PDF
  • the manufacturer. Public Website Does your company maintain a public website describing all hearing aid-compatible models, the ratings of those models, and an explanation of the rating system? Yes Website address: www.mtasolutions.com Explain: Page1 of 11 FCC Form 655 June 2009 Reference Copy Consumer Outreach Describe consumer outreach efforts in the past 12 months: None. Methodology for Functionality Levels Section 20.19(d)(4)(ii) allows service providers to set functionality standards for phones offered. MTA has set a 3 Tier ranking schedule for all phones. Level 1 is for phones with volume adjust functions. Level 2 is for phones with volume level adjustment and speaker phones capabilities. Level 3 is for phones with Level 1 and 2 capabilities as well as Wi-Fi functionality. Report
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/100317/Marne%20&%20Elk%20Horn%20Tel_190.PDF
  • the State of Iowa. The Company provides its service in conjunction with Iowa Wireless Services d/b/a iwireless. The Company operates CMRS facilities but it does not currently have any subscribers, it does not have retail outlets and it does not offer wireless handsets to the public. As such, the Company qualifies for the de minimis exception set forth in Section 20.19(e) of the Commission's Rules. Do all hearing aid-compatible handsets with the Wi-Fi air interface have clear and effective disclosure that the handset has not been tested for hearing aid compatibility with respect to its Wi-Fi voice operation? No Explain: Not applicable. The Company does not offer wireless handsets to the public and it qualifies for the de minimis exception. Public
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/100317/PR%20Wireless%20Inc._192.PDF
  • an agent on behalf of a manufacturer or service provider? No Do all hearing aid-compatible handsets include labeling? No Product Labeling Explain: During the course of an audit of this report, the Company (PR Wireless Inc./ dba Open Mobile) discovers that some of the hearing aid compatible models that it offers do not contain the proper labeling consistent with Section 20.19(f) of the FCC rules. The Company is actively working to resolve this situation and has contacted each of the applicable manufacturers and is currently engaged in taking the steps to bring the packaging for these handsets into compliance. Do all hearing aid-compatible handsets with the Wi-Fi air interface have clear and effective disclosure that the handset has not been tested
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/100317/PVT%20Wireless%20Limited_158.PDF
  • Website address: Explain: PVT Wireless Limited Partnership ("the Company") is a small rural CMRS service provider with operations that utilize a UTStarcom PASª wireless access platform. Because the Company offers only one type of digital wireless handset (the UTStarcom model UTS-708j), the Company qualifies for the de minimis exception to the Hearing Aid Compatibility ("HAC") rules, described in Rule Section 20.19 (e)(1). Consumer Outreach Describe consumer outreach efforts in the past 12 months: n/a Methodology for Functionality Levels n/a Report Remarks Handset Maker Handset 1: UT Starcom UTS-708j UT Starcom Handset Model Name FCC ID UTS-708j 06YUTS-708J Air Interfaces/Frequency Bands 1900 MHz PHS Is this handset capable of Wi-Fi voice operations? No This handset model was offered from: 06/01 to 12/09
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/100317/Panora%20Telecommunica_85.PDF
  • the GSM air interface in the State of Iowa. The Company provides its service in conjunction with Iowa Wireless Services d/b/a iwireless. While the Company operates CMRS facilities, it does not currently have any subscribers and it does not offer digital wireless handsets to the public. As such, the Company qualifies for the de minimis exception set forth in Section 20.19(e) of the Commission's Rules. Do all hearing aid-compatible handsets with the Wi-Fi air interface have clear and effective disclosure that the handset has not been tested for hearing aid compatibility with respect to its Wi-Fi voice operation? No Explain: Not applicable. The Company does not offer wireless handsets to the public. Public Website Does your company maintain a public website
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/100317/PetroCom%20License%20Cor_3.PDF
  • to its Wi-Fi voice operation? Yes Explain: Public Website Does your company maintain a public website describing all hearing aid-compatible models, the ratings of those models, and an explanation of the rating system? No Website address: Explain: Because Broadpoint offers only two handsets, it is exempt as de minimis from all FCC hearing aid compatibility rules except reporting. 47 C.F.R. 20.19(e). Consumer Outreach Describe consumer outreach efforts in the past 12 months: Because Broadpoint offers only two handsets, it is exempt as de minimis from all FCC hearing aid compatibility rules except reporting. 47 C.F.R. 20.19(e). Methodology for Functionality Levels N/A Report Remarks Handset Maker Handset 1: Nokia 6085 Nokia Handset Model Name FCC ID 6085 LJPRM-198H Air Interfaces/Frequency Bands 850
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/100317/SEI%20Wireless%20LLC_105.PDF
  • City: State: Zip Code: 280 303 W Main Hills IA 52235 Contact Phone: Contact Fax: Contact Email: (319) 646-6078 wellman@netins.net Filing Agent Is this report being filed by an agent on behalf of a manufacturer or service provider? No Do all hearing aid-compatible handsets include labeling? No Product Labeling Explain: All compliant handserts were labeled in accordance with 47 C.F.R. 20.19 (f) requirements except the following: Sony Ericsson Z310-Boxes are not labeled. Company refuses to send labels. Inserts are included in the boxes. sony Ericsson W580-Boxes are not labeled. company refuses to send labels. Inserts are included in the boxes. Clarity Life C900-Boxes are not labeled. company refused to send labels. Inserts are included in the box. Do all hearing aid-compatible
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/100317/Sharon%20Telephone%20Com_106.PDF
  • 280 303 W Main St Hills IA 52235 Contact Phone: Contact Fax: Contact Email: (319) 679-2211 (319) 679-2200 stcnet@netins.net Filing Agent Is this report being filed by an agent on behalf of a manufacturer or service provider? No Do all hearing aid-compatible handsets include labeling? No Product Labeling Explain: All compliant handsets were labeled in accordance with 47 C.F.R. § 20.19 (f) requirements except the following: Sony Ericsson Z310 ­ Boxes are not labeled. Company refuses to send labels. Inserts are included in the boxes. Sony Ericsson W580 ­ Boxes are not labeled. Company refuses to send labels. Inserts are included in the boxes. Clarity Life C900 ­ Boxes are not labeled. Company refused to send labels. Inserts are included in
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/100317/Unicom_210.PDF
  • Public Website Does your company maintain a public website describing all hearing aid-compatible models, the ratings of those models, and an explanation of the rating system? No Website address: Explain: Unicom offers only two handsets and therefore qualifies for the de minimis exception to compliance with Page1 of 3 FCC Form 655 June 2009 Reference Copy the requirements in Section 20.19 of the Commission's rules. Consumer Outreach Describe consumer outreach efforts in the past 12 months: Unicom offers only two handsets and therefore qualifies for the de minimis exception to compliance with the requirements in Section 20.19 of the Commission's rules. Methodology for Functionality Levels Unicom offers only two handsets and therefore qualifies for the de minimis exception to compliance with
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/100317/Walnut%20Communication_187.PDF
  • CMRS service provider with operations that utilize the CDMA air interface in the State of Iowa. The Company operates CMRS facilities for the provision of service to roaming customers but it does not have retail outlets and it does not offer wireless handsets to the public. As such, the Company qualifies for the de minimis exception set forth in Section 20.19(e) of the Commission's Rules. Do all hearing aid-compatible handsets with the Wi-Fi air interface have clear and effective disclosure that the handset has not been tested for hearing aid compatibility with respect to its Wi-Fi voice operation? No Explain: Not applicable. The Company does not offer wireless handsets to the public and it qualifies for the HAC de minimis exception.
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/100317/Webster-Calhoun%20Coop_214.PDF
  • the State of Iowa. The company provides its service in conjunction with Iowa Wireless Services d/b/a iwireless. The Company operates CMRS facilities but it does not currently have any subscribers, it does not have retail outlets and it does not offer wireless handsets to the public. As such, the Company qualifies for the de minimis exception set forth in Section 20.19(e) of the Commission's Rules. Do all hearing aid-compatible handsets with the Wi-Fi air interface have clear and effective disclosure that the handset has not been tested for hearing aid compatibility with respect to its Wi-Fi voice operation? No Explain: Not applicable. The Company does not offer wireless handsets to the public and it qualifies for the de minimis exception. Public
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/100317/Whidbey%20Telephone%20Co_218.PDF
  • is a small, Tier III Commercial Mobile Radio Service licensee, as defined in the Commission's E-911 Order to Stay, FCC 02-210, released July 26, 2002. The Company's broadband PCS systems employ a GSM air interface. Because the Company offers two or fewer digital wireless handsets in the U.S., the Company qualifies for the de minimis exception set forth in Section 20.19 (e)(1) of the Commission's Rules. Do all hearing aid-compatible handsets with the Wi-Fi air interface have clear and effective disclosure that the handset has not been tested for hearing aid compatibility with respect to its Wi-Fi voice operation? No Explain: Not applicable. The Company does not offer digital wireless handsets to subscribers. Public Website Does your company maintain a public
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/110210/5897629_7.PDF
  • $10) and · Smartphone/PDAs (devices that run complete operating system software as a platform for application developers) Report Remarks Carrier may offer certain handsets that are capable of operating on more than one air interface. Carrier currently operates only on the air interface(s) specified below. The Commission has made it clear that the HAC handset phase-in requirements specified in Section 20.19(c)(3) apply only "for each air interface it offers." Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 16753 (2003) at ¶ 53. Moreover, these handset phase-in requirements are triggered only after a service provider has begun offering service using a particular air interface. Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 7171 (2007) at ¶ 60. Page2 of 34 FCC Form 655 December 2010
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/110210/5899566_15.PDF
  • Iowa. The Company provides its service in conjunction with Iowa Wireless Services d/b/a iWireless. As noted above, the Company operates CMRS facilities but it does not currently have any subscribers, it does not have retail outlets and it does not offer wireless handsets to the public. As such, the Company qualifies for the de minimis exception set forth in Section 20.19(e) of the Commission's Rules. Do all hearing aid-compatible handsets that are capable of voice communication over any air interface or frequency band that does not currently have hearing aid compatibility technical standards have clear and effective disclosure that the handset has not been rated for hearing aid compatibility with respect to such operations? No Explain: Not applicable. The Company does
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/110210/5901874_18.PDF
  • maintain a public website describing all hearing aid-compatible models, the ratings of those models, and an explanation of the rating system? Yes Website address: http://www.broadpointinc.com/ Explain: Consumer Outreach Describe consumer outreach efforts in the past 12 months: Because Broadpoint offered only one handset, it was exempt as de minimis from all FCC hearing aid compatibility rules except reporting. 47 C.F.R. 20.19(e). Methodology for Functionality Levels Because Broadpoint offered only one handset, no levels of functionality beyond "functional" were determined. Report Remarks On June 8, 2010, Broadpoint was sold. This report covers the period from January 1, 2010 until the sale on June 8, 2010. Air Interface Fully Hearing Aid Compatible Number Percent Acoustic Coupling Compatible Only Number Percent Non-Compliant Handsets Number
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/110210/5911228_38.PDF
  • $10) and · Smartphone/PDAs (devices that run complete operating system software as a platform for application developers) Report Remarks Carrier may offer certain handsets that are capable of operating on more than one air interface. Carrier currently operates only on the air interface(s) specified below. The Commission has made it clear that the HAC handset phase-in requirements specified in Section 20.19(c)(3) apply only "for each air interface it offers." Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 16753 (2003) at ¶ 53. Moreover, these handset phase-in requirements are triggered only after a service provider has begun offering service using a particular air interface. Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 7171 (2007) at ¶ 60. Page2 of 28 FCC Form 655 December 2010
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/110210/5916300_45.PDF
  • $10) and · Smartphone/PDAs (devices that run complete operating system software as a platform for application developers) Report Remarks Carrier may offer certain handsets that are capable of operating on more than one air interface. Carrier currently operates only on the air interface(s) specified below. The Commission has made it clear that the HAC handset phase-in requirements specified in Section 20.19(c)(3) apply only "for each air interface it offers." Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 16753 (2003) at ¶ 53. Moreover, these handset phase-in requirements are triggered only after a service provider has begun offering service using a particular air interface. Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 7171 (2007) at ¶ 60. Page2 of 28 FCC Form 655 December 2010
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/110210/5919001_55.PDF
  • $10) and · Smartphone/PDAs (devices that run complete operating system software as a platform for application developers) Report Remarks Carrier may offer certain handsets that are capable of operating on more than one air interface. Carrier currently operates only on the air interface(s) specified below. The Commission has made it clear that the HAC handset phase-in requirements specified in Section 20.19(c)(3) apply only "for each air interface it offers." Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 16753 (2003) at ¶ 53. Moreover, these handset phase-in requirements are triggered only after a service provider has begun offering service using a particular air interface. Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 7171 (2007) at ¶ 60. Page2 of 31 FCC Form 655 December 2010
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/110210/5919811_56.PDF
  • $10) and · Smartphone/PDAs (devices that run complete operating system software as a platform for application developers). Report Remarks Carrier may offer certain handsets that are capable of operating on more than one air interface. Carrier currently operates only on the air interface(s) specified below. The Commission has made it clear that the HAC handset phase-in requirements specified in Section 20.19(c)(3) apply only "for each air interface it offers." Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 16753 (2003) at ¶ 53. Moreover, these handset phase-in requirements are triggered only after a service provider has begun offering service using a particular air interface. Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 7171 (2007) at ¶ 60. Page2 of 31 FCC Form 655 December 2010
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/110210/5920046_57.PDF
  • rated for hearing aid compatibility with respect to such operations? Yes Explain: Public Website Does your company maintain a public website describing all hearing aid-compatible models, the ratings of those Page1 of 3 FCC Form 655 December 2010 Reference Copy models, and an explanation of the rating system? No Website address: Explain: De minimis service providers are exempted from Section 20.19 HAC requirements via subsection 20.19(e). Consumer Outreach Describe consumer outreach efforts in the past 12 months: De minimis service providers are exempted from Section 20.19 HAC requirements via subsection 20.19(e). Methodology for Functionality Levels De minimis service providers are exempted from Section 20.19 HAC requirements via subsection 20.19(e). Report Remarks De minimis service providers are exempted from Section 20.19 HAC
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/110210/5925546_69.PDF
  • $10) and · Smartphone/PDAs (devices that run complete operating system software as a platform for application developers) Report Remarks Carrier may offer certain handsets that are capable of operating on more than one air interface. Carrier currently operates only on the air interface(s) specified below. The Commission has made it clear that the HAC handset phase-in requirements specified in Section 20.19(c)(3) apply only "for each air interface it offers." Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 16753 (2003) at ¶ 53. Moreover, these handset phase-in requirements are triggered only after a service provider has begun offering service using a particular air interface. Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 7171 (2007) at ¶ 60. Page2 of 9 FCC Form 655 December 2010
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/110210/5928431_87.PDF
  • the State of Iowa. The company provides its service in conjunction with Iowa Wireless Services d/b/a iWireless. The Company operates CMRS facilities but it does not currently have any subscribers, it does not have retail outlets and it does not offer wireless handsets to the public. As such, the Company qualifies for the de minimis exception set forth in Section 20.19 (e) of the Commission's Rules. Do all hearing aid-compatible handsets that are capable of voice communication over any air interface or frequency band that does not currently have hearing aid compatibility technical standards have clear and effective disclosure that the handset has not been rated for hearing aid compatibility with respect to such operations? No Explain: Not applicable. The Company
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/110210/5928523_88.PDF
  • the State of Iowa. The company provides its service in conjunction with Iowa Wireless Services d/b/a iWireless. The Company operates CMRS facilities but it does not currently have any subscribers, it does not have retail outlets and it does not offer wireless handsets to the public. As such, the Company qualifies for the de minimis exception set forth in Section 20.19 (e) of the Commission's Rules. Do all hearing aid-compatible handsets that are capable of voice communication over any air interface or frequency band that does not currently have hearing aid compatibility technical standards have clear and effective disclosure that the handset has not been rated for hearing aid compatibility with respect to such operations? No Explain: Not applicable. The Company
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/110210/5928584_89.PDF
  • the State of Iowa. The company provides its service in conjunction with Iowa Wireless Services d/b/a iWireless. The Company operates CMRS facilities but it does not currently have any subscribers, it does not have retail outlets and it does not offer wireless handsets to the public. As such, the Company qualifies for the de minimis exception set forth in Section 20.19 (e) of the Commission's Rules. Do all hearing aid-compatible handsets that are capable of voice communication over any air interface or frequency band that does not currently have hearing aid compatibility technical standards have clear and effective disclosure that the handset has not been rated for hearing aid compatibility with respect to such operations? No Explain: Not applicable. The Company
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/110210/5929796_93.PDF
  • more advanced capabilities); Smartphones/PDAs (devices that run complete operating system software as a platform for application developers). Report Remarks Carrier may offer certain handsets that are capable of operating on more than one air interface. Carrier currently operates only on the air interface(s) specified below. The Commission has made it clear that the HAC handset phase-in requirements specified in Section 20.19(c)(3) apply only "for each air interface it offers." Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 16753 (2003) at ¶ 53. Moreover, these handset phase-in requirements are triggered only after a service provider has begun offering service using a particular air interface. Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 7171 (2007) at ¶ 60. Air Interface Fully Hearing Aid Compatible Number Percent
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/110210/5935279_126.PDF
  • http://www.mycricket.com/features-and-downloads/phone-compatibility Explain: Consumer Outreach Describe consumer outreach efforts in the past 12 months: In addition to providing information on its website regarding HAC handset models, Cricket sales personnel have been made aware of the HAC requirements and the HAC handsets offered by Cricket. Cricket makes HAC handsets available to customers for testing in its retail stores, as required by Section 20.19(c)(4)(i) of the FCC's rules. Methodology for Functionality Levels Cricket offers handsets with a wide range of features and capabilities, and at varying price points. As demonstrated on Cricket's webpage describing its handset models, Cricket's HAC-rated handsets range from basic devices at lower price points, to more feature-rich phones that may include touchscreens, cameras and higher-speed data capabilities (including Smartphones and
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/110210/5935340_132.PDF
  • CMRS service provider with operations that utilize the CDMA air interface in the State of Iowa. The Company operates CMRS facilities for the provision of service to roaming customers but it does not have retail outlets and it does not offer wireless handsets to the public. As such, the Company qualifies for the de minimis exception set forth in Section 20.19(e) of the Commission's Rules. Do all hearing aid-compatible handsets that are capable of voice communication over any air interface or frequency band that does not currently have hearing aid compatibility technical standards have clear and effective disclosure that the handset has not been rated for hearing aid compatibility with respect to such operations? No Explain: Not applicable. The Company does
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/110210/5935406_133.PDF
  • Matt Connolly PO Box: Street Address: City: State: Zip Code: 270017 Kansas City MO 64127 Contact Phone: Contact Fax: Contact Email: (816) 388-1066 mconnolly@yourtel.com Filing Agent Is this report being filed by an agent on behalf of a manufacturer or service provider? No Brand Names: YourTel Wireless Do all hearing aid-compatible handsets include labeling? No Product Labeling Explain: N/A under 20.19 (e) De minimis exception. Do all hearing aid-compatible handsets that are capable of voice communication over any air interface or frequency band that does not currently have hearing aid compatibility technical standards have clear and effective disclosure that the handset has not been rated for hearing aid compatibility with respect to such operations? No Explain: N/A under 20.19 (e) De
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/110210/5936798_144.PDF
  • features and functionalities. Report Remarks Although several of the handsets available to customers from the Company via iWireless's website are capable of operating on the WCDMA air interface, the Company only operated on the GSM air interface in 2010. The Company did not offer service using the WCDMA air interface in 2010. The HAC handset benchmarks set forth in Section 20.19(c)(3) apply only for each interface actually offered by a carrier, and the HAC handset requirements for a particular interface are triggered only after a service provider has actually started providing service using that air interface. Hearing Aid-Compatible Telephones (Petitions for Waiver of Section 20.19 of the Commission's Rules), Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 7171, para. 60 (2007). Accordingly,
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/110210/5936822_145.PDF
  • Main St Hills IA 52235 Contact Phone: Contact Fax: Contact Email: (319) 679-2211 (319) 679-2200 stcnet@netins.net Filing Agent Is this report being filed by an agent on behalf of a manufacturer or service provider? No Brand Names: I Wireless Do all hearing aid-compatible handsets include labeling? No Product Labeling Explain: ALL COMPLIANT HANDSETS ARE LABELED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 47 C.F.R. 20.19 EXCEPT SONY ERICSSON Z310A. COMPANY REFUSES TO SEND LABELS. INSERTS ARE INCLUDED IN BOXES. SONY ERICSSON W580- BOXES NOT LABELED. INSERTS ARE INCLUDED. CLARITY LIFE- BOXES NOT LABELED INSERTS ARE INCLUDED. Do all hearing aid-compatible handsets that are capable of voice communication over any air interface or frequency band that does not currently have hearing aid compatibility technical standards have
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/110210/5937108_149.PDF
  • the State of Iowa. The Company provides its service in conjunction with Iowa Wireless Services d/b/a iWireless. The Company operates CMRS facilities but it does not currently have any subscribers, it does not have retail outlets and it does not offer wireless handsets to the public. As such, the Company qualifies for the de minimis exception set forth in Section 20.19(e) of the Commission's Rules. Do all hearing aid-compatible handsets that are capable of voice communication over any air interface or frequency band that does not currently have hearing aid compatibility technical standards have clear and effective disclosure that the handset has not been rated for hearing aid compatibility with respect to such operations? No Explain: Not applicable. The Company does
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/110210/5937382_153.PDF
  • is discribed by its capabilities regarding features and functionalities. Basic handsets- Entry level handsets that are offered for low cost or free. Featured handsets- Handsets with more advanced capabilities. Smartphones/PDA - Handsets that run complete operating system software as a platform for application developers. Report Remarks Product Labeling: All compliant handsets were labeled in accordance with 47 C.F. R. & 20.19 (F) requirements except the following: Sony Ericsson Z310 - Boxes are not labeled . Company refuses to send labels. Inserts are included in the boxes. Sony Ericsson W580 -Boxes are not labeled . Company refuses to send labels. Inserts are included in the boxes. Clarity Life C900-Boxes are not labeled . Company refuses to send labels. Inserts are included in
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/110210/5937723_156.PDF
  • features and functionalities. Report Remarks Although several of the handsets available to customers from the Company via iWireless's website are capable of operating on the WCDMA air interface, the Company only operated on the GSM air interface in 2010. The Company did not offer service using the WCDMA air interface in 2010. The HAC handset benchmarks set forth in Section 20.19(c)(3) apply only for each interface actually offered by a carrier, and the HAC handset requirements for a particular interface are triggered only after a service provider has actually started providing service using that air interface. Hearing Aid-Compatible Telephones (Petitions for Waiver of Section 20.19 of the Commission's Rules), Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 7171, para. 60 (2007). Accordingly,
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/110210/5938195_165.PDF
  • features and functionalities. Report Remarks Although several of the handsets available to customers from the Company via iWireless's website are capable of operating on the WCDMA air interface, the Company only operated on the GSM air interface in 2010. The Company did not offer service using the WCDMA air interface in 2010. The HAC handset benchmarks set forth in Section 20.19(c)(3) apply only for each interface actually offered by a carrier, and the HAC handset requirements for a particular interface are triggered only after a service provider has actually started providing service using that air interface. Hearing Aid-Compatible Telephones (Petitions for Waiver of Section 20.19 of the Commission's Rules), Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 7171, para. 60 (2007). Accordingly,
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/110210/5938640_166.PDF
  • $10) and · Smartphone/PDAs (devices that run complete operating system software as a platform for application developers) Report Remarks Carrier may offer certain handsets that are capable of operating on more than one air interface. Carrier currently operates only on the air interface(s) specified below. The Commission has made it clear that the HAC handset phase-in requirements specified in Section 20.19(c)(3) apply only "for each air interface it offers." Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 16753 (2003) at ¶ 53. Moreover, these handset phase-in requirements are triggered only after a service provider has begun offering service using a particular air interface. Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 7171 (2007) at ¶ 60. Page2 of 35 FCC Form 655 December 2010
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/110210/5938835_168.PDF
  • the more than 180 handsets supported under Simple Mobile's "bring your own phone" model. As explained in the Petition, Simple Mobile conservatively estimates that it currently supports over 44 handsets with an M-3 or better rating and over 26 handsets with a T-3 or better rating. These totals far exceed the maximums required under the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 20.19(c)(3) and 20.19(d)(3). Air Interface Fully Hearing Aid Compatible Number Percent Acoustic Coupling Compatible Only Number Percent Non-Compliant Handsets Number Percent Total by Air Interface You have reported the following handset model summary information. Total number of handsets offered: 9 GSM 6 67% 3 33% 9 Handset Maker Handset 1: Alcatel 880 Alcatel Handset Model Name FCC ID 880 RAD126 Air
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/110210/5938840_169.PDF
  • outreach efforts in the past 12 months: DNA Methodology for Functionality Levels DNA Report Remarks The Company offers service to subcribers of carriers that are members of the Rural Independent Network Association when they are in the Logan, Utah area. Since the Company offers fewer than three handsets to the public, it qualifies for the de minimis exception in Section 20.19(e) of the Commission's Rules. Air Interface Fully Hearing Aid Compatible Number Percent Acoustic Coupling Compatible Only Number Percent Non-Compliant Handsets Number Percent Total by Air Interface You have reported the following handset model summary information. Total number of handsets offered: 0 This Report has been certified by: Eddie L Cox President 01/18/2011 01:38 PM Certification Page2 of 2 FCC Form
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/110210/5939262_172.PDF
  • $10) and · Smartphone/PDAs (devices that run complete operating system software as a platform for application developers) Report Remarks Carrier may offer certain handsets that are capable of operating on more than one air interface. Carrier currently operates only on the air interface(s) specified below. The Commission has made it clear that the HAC handset phase-in requirements specified in Section 20.19(c)(3) apply only "for each air interface it offers." Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 16753 (2003) at ¶ 53. Moreover, these handset phase-in requirements are triggered only after a service provider has begun offering service using a particular air interface. Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 7171 (2007) at ¶ 60. Page2 of 35 FCC Form 655 December 2010
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/110210/5939822_179.PDF
  • $10) and · Smartphone/PDAs (devices that run complete operating system software as a platform for application developers) Report Remarks Carrier may offer certain handsets that are capable of operating on more than one air interface. Carrier currently operates only on the air interface(s) specified below. The Commission has made it clear that the HAC handset phase-in requirements specified in Section 20.19(c)(3) apply only "for each air interface it offers." Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 16753 (2003) at ¶ 53. Moreover, these handset phase-in requirements are triggered only after a service provider has begun offering service using a particular air interface. Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 7171 (2007) at ¶ 60. Page2 of 35 FCC Form 655 December 2010
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/110210/5939854_180.PDF
  • software as a platform for application developers) Report Remarks Carrier may offer certain handsets that are capable of operating on more than one air interface. Carrier currently Page2 of 35 FCC Form 655 December 2010 Reference Copy operates only on the air interface(s) specified below. The Commission has made it clear that the HAC handset phase-in requirements specified in Section 20.19(c)(3) apply only "for each air interface it offers." Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 16753 (2003) at ¶ 53. Moreover, these handset phase-in requirements are triggered only after a service provider has begun offering service using a particular air interface. Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 7171 (2007) at ¶ 60. Air Interface Fully Hearing Aid Compatible Number Percent
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/110210/5940227_188.PDF
  • $10) and · Smartphone/PDAs (devices that run complete operating system software as a platform for application developers) Report Remarks Carrier may offer certain handsets that are capable of operating on more than one air interface. Carrier currently operates only on the air interface(s) specified below. The Commission has made it clear that the HAC handset phase-in requirements specified in Section 20.19(c)(3) apply only "for each air interface it offers." Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 16753 (2003) at ¶ 53. Moreover, these handset phase-in requirements are triggered only after a service provider has begun offering service using a particular air interface. Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 7171 (2007) at ¶ 60. Page2 of 35 FCC Form 655 December 2010
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/110210/5940502_196.PDF
  • a platform for application developers) Report Remarks The Company may offer certain handsets that are capable of operating on more than one air interface. The Company Page2 of 35 FCC Form 655 December 2010 Reference Copy currently operates only on the air interface(s) specified below. The Commission has made it clear that the HAC handset phase-in requirements specified in Section 20.19(c)(3) apply only "for each air interface it offers." Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 16753 (2003) at ¶ 53. Moreover, these handset phase-in requirements are triggered only after a service provider has begun offering service using a particular air interface. Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 7171 (2007) at ¶ 60. Air Interface Fully Hearing Aid Compatible Number Percent
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/110210/5941502_202.PDF
  • Describe consumer outreach efforts in the past 12 months: MTA Wireless ensures that all of our sales and service staff are trained to identify hearing aid compatibility for each phone in order to assist customers in their phone selection. In addition, the hearing aid compatibility rating for each phone is clearly provided on our website. Methodology for Functionality Levels Section 20.19(d)(4)(ii) allows service providers to set functionality standards for phones offered. MTA has set a 4 Tier ranking schedule for all phones. Level 1 is for phones with volume adjustment and basic features of voice and text. Level 2 is for phones with volume level adjustment, speaker phones capabilities, and basic features plus camera, Bluetooth and/or internet capabilities. Level 3 is
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/110210/5942134_217.PDF
  • features and functionalities. Report Remarks Although several of the handsets available to customers from the Company via iWireless's website are capable of operating on the WCDMA air interface, the Company only operated on the GSM air interface in 2010. The Company did not offer service using the WCDMA air interface in 2010. The HAC handset benchmarks set forth in Section 20.19(c)(3) apply only for each interface actually offered by a carrier, and the HAC handset requirements for a particular interface are triggered only after a service provider has actually started providing service using that air interface. Hearing Aid-Compatible Telephones (Petitions for Waiver of Section 20.19 of the Commission's Rules), Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 7171, para. 60 (2007). Accordingly,
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/110210/5942305_220.PDF
  • Zip Code: 280 100 E Main Hills IA 52235 Contact Phone: Contact Fax: Contact Email: (319) 679-2211 SEI@netins.net Filing Agent Is this report being filed by an agent on behalf of a manufacturer or service provider? No Brand Names: IWIRELESS Do all hearing aid-compatible handsets include labeling? No Product Labeling Explain: All compliant handsets were labeled in accordance with 47 C.F.R.20.19 (f) requirements except the following: Sony Ericsson Z310-Boxes are not labeled. Comapny refuses to send labels. Inserts are included in the boxes Sony Ericsson W580-Boxes are not labeled. Comapny refuses to send labels. Inserts are included in the boxes Clarity Life C900-Boxes are not labeled. Company refused to send labels. Inserts are included in the boxes. Do all hearing aid-compatible
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/110210/5942388_221.PDF
  • features and functionalities. Report Remarks Although several of the handsets available to customers from the Company via iWireless's website are capable of operating on the WCDMA air interface, the Company only operated on the GSM air interface in 2010. The Company did not offer service using the WCDMA air interface in 2010. The HAC handset benchmarks set forth in Section 20.19(c)(3) apply only for each interface actually offered by a carrier, and the HAC handset requirements for a particular interface are triggered only after a service provider has actually started providing service using that air interface. Hearing Aid-Compatible Telephones (Petitions for Waiver of Section 20.19 of the Commission's Rules), Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 7171, para. 60 (2007). Accordingly,
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/110210/5942406_222.PDF
  • rated for hearing aid compatibility with respect to such operations? Yes Explain: Public Website Does your company maintain a public website describing all hearing aid-compatible models, the ratings of those Page1 of 3 FCC Form 655 December 2010 Reference Copy models, and an explanation of the rating system? No Website address: Explain: De minimis service providers are exempted from Section 20.19 HAC requirements via subsection 20.19(e). Consumer Outreach Describe consumer outreach efforts in the past 12 months: De minimis service providers are exempted from Section 20.19 HAC requirements via subsection 20.19(e). Methodology for Functionality Levels De minimis service providers are exempted from Section 20.19 HAC requirements via subsection 20.19(e). Report Remarks Air Interface Fully Hearing Aid Compatible Number Percent Acoustic Coupling
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/110210/5942601_226.PDF
  • a platform for application developers) Report Remarks The Company may offer certain handsets that are capable of operating on more than one air interface. The Company Page2 of 35 FCC Form 655 December 2010 Reference Copy currently operates only on the air interface(s) specified below. The Commission has made it clear that the HAC handset phase-in requirements specified in Section 20.19(c)(3) apply only "for each air interface it offers." Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 16753 (2003) at ¶ 53. Moreover, these handset phase-in requirements are triggered only after a service provider has begun offering service using a particular air interface. Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 7171 (2007) at ¶ 60. Air Interface Fully Hearing Aid Compatible Number Percent
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/110210/5943267_237.PDF
  • Website address: Explain: PVT Wireless Limited Partnership ("the Company") is a small rural CMRS service provider with operations that utilize a UTStarcom PASª wireless access platform. Because the Company offers only one type of digital wireless handset (the UTStarcom model UTS-708j), the Company qualifies for the de minimis exception to the Hearing Aid Compatibility ("HAC") rules, described in Rule Section 20.19 (e)(1). Consumer Outreach Describe consumer outreach efforts in the past 12 months: Not applicable. The Company qualifies for the de minimis exception to the Hearing Aid Compatibility ("HAC") rules, described in Rule Section 20.19 (e)(1). Methodology for Functionality Levels Not applicable. The Company qualifies for the de minimis exception to the Hearing Aid Compatibility ("HAC") rules, described in Rule Section
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/110210/5943360_240.PDF
  • is a small, Tier III Commercial Mobile Radio Service licensee, as defined in the Commission's E-911 Order to Stay, FCC 02-210, released July 26, 2002. The Company's broadband PCS systems employ a GSM air interface. Because the Company offers two or fewer digital wireless handsets in the U.S., the Company qualifies for the de minimis exception set forth in Section 20.19 (e)(1) of the Commission's Rules. Do all hearing aid-compatible handsets that are capable of voice communication over any air interface or frequency band that does not currently have hearing aid compatibility technical standards have clear and effective disclosure that the handset has not been rated for hearing aid compatibility with respect to such operations? No Explain: Not applicable. The Company
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/110210/5944276_244.PDF
  • Wireless, LLC ("the Company") is a small rural CMRS service provider with operations that utilize the GSM air interface in the State of South Dakota. As noted above, the Company operates CMRS facilities but it currently offers two or fewer wireless handset models to the public. As such, the Company qualifies for the de minimis exception set forth in Section 20.19(e) of the Commission's Rules. Consumer Outreach Describe consumer outreach efforts in the past 12 months: While the Company is currently exempt from the Commission's HAC rules, it has undertaken outreach efforts through the preparation of a detailed Hearing Aid Compatibility Information Sheet that will make available to customers that use hearing aids and others who have questions on the subject.
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/110210/5944339_246.PDF
  • has not been rated for hearing aid compatibility with respect to such operations? Yes Explain: Public Website Does your company maintain a public website describing all hearing aid-compatible models, the ratings of those models, and an explanation of the rating system? No Website address: Explain: Not Applicable. The Company qualifies for the HAC de minimis exception set forth in Section 20.19(e) of the Commission's Rules. Consumer Outreach Describe consumer outreach efforts in the past 12 months: While the Company is currently exempt from the Commission's HAC rules, it has undertaken outreach efforts through the preparation of a detailed Hearing Aid Compatibility Information Sheet that will make available to customers that use hearing aids and others who have questions on the subject.
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/110210/5944572_248.PDF
  • $10) and · Smartphone/PDAs (devices that run complete operating system software as a platform for application developers) Report Remarks Carrier may offer certain handsets that are capable of operating on more than one air interface. Carrier currently operates only on the air interface(s) specified below. The Commission has made it clear that the HAC handset phase-in requirements specified in Section 20.19(c)(3) apply only "for each air interface it offers." Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 16753 (2003) at ¶ 53. Moreover, these handset phase-in requirements are triggered only after a service provider has begun offering service using a particular air interface. Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 7171 (2007) at ¶ 60. Page2 of 35 FCC Form 655 December 2010
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/110210/5945856_257.PDF
  • Sioux Center IA 51250 Contact Phone: Contact Fax: Contact Email: (712) 722-3451 (712) 722-1113 danb@mypremieronline.com Filing Agent Is this report being filed by an agent on behalf of a manufacturer or service provider? No Brand Names: Premier Wireless iWireless Do all hearing aid-compatible handsets include labeling? No Product Labeling Explain: All compliant handsets were labeled in accordance with 47 C.F.R 20.19(f)requirements except the following: Sony Ericsson Z310-Boxes not labeled. Company refuses to send labels for the boxes. Inserts are included in the boxes. Sony Ericsson W580-Boxes not labeled Company refuses to send labels for the boxes. Inserts are included in the boxes. ClarityLife C900-Boxes not labeled. Company refuses to send labels for the boxes. Inserts are included in the boxes. Do
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/110210/5945876_258.PDF
  • $10) and · Smartphone/PDAs (devices that run complete operating system software as a platform for application developers) Report Remarks Carrier may offer certain handsets that are capable of operating on more than one air interface. Carrier currently operates only on the air interface(s) specified below. The Commission has made it clear that the HAC handset phase-in requirements specified in Section 20.19(c)(3) apply only "for each air interface it offers." Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 16753 (2003) at ¶ 53. Moreover, these handset phase-in requirements are triggered only after a service provider has begun offering service using a particular air interface. Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 7171 (2007) at ¶ 60. Page2 of 35 FCC Form 655 December 2010
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/110210/5948812_288.PDF
  • Street Address: City: State: Zip Code: 112 NW 132nd Street Oklahoma City OK 73114 Contact Phone: Contact Fax: Contact Email: (405) 320-1855 (214) 572-9112 heather@terracominc.com Filing Agent Is this report being filed by an agent on behalf of a manufacturer or service provider? No Brand Names: TerraCom Do all hearing aid-compatible handsets include labeling? No Product Labeling Explain: N/A under 20.19 (e) De minimis exception Do all hearing aid-compatible handsets that are capable of voice communication over any air interface or frequency band that does not currently have hearing aid compatibility technical standards have clear and effective disclosure that the handset has not been rated for hearing aid compatibility with respect to such operations? No Explain: N/A under 20.19 (e) De
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/110210/5948844_290.PDF
  • Street Address: City: State: Zip Code: 116 NW 132nd Street Oklahoma City OK 73114 Contact Phone: Contact Fax: Contact Email: (405) 293-4012 (405) 753-9111 h.russell@mylifetel.com Filing Agent Is this report being filed by an agent on behalf of a manufacturer or service provider? No Brand Names: LifeTel Do all hearing aid-compatible handsets include labeling? No Product Labeling Explain: N/A under 20.19 (e) De minims exception Do all hearing aid-compatible handsets that are capable of voice communication over any air interface or frequency band that does not currently have hearing aid compatibility technical standards have clear and effective disclosure that the handset has not been rated for hearing aid compatibility with respect to such operations? No Explain: N/A under 20.19 (e) De
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/110210/5948985_293.PDF
  • · Smartphone/PDAs (devices that run complete operating system software as a platform for application developers) Report Remarks The Company may offer certain handsets that are capable of operating on more than one air interface. The Company currently operates only on the air interface(s) specified below. The Commission has made it clear that the HAC handset phase-in requirements specified in Section 20.19(c)(3) apply only "for each air interface it offers." Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 16753 (2003) at ¶ 53. Moreover, these handset phase-in requirements are triggered only after a service provider has begun offering service using a particular air interface. Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 7171 (2007) at ¶ 60. Page2 of 35 FCC Form 655 December 2010
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/110210/5949999_305.PDF
  • No Explain: Public Website Does your company maintain a public website describing all hearing aid-compatible models, the ratings of those models, and an explanation of the rating system? Website address: Explain: Consumer Outreach Describe consumer outreach efforts in the past 12 months: N/A Methodology for Functionality Levels N/A Report Remarks Consolidated Telcom qualifies for the de minimis exception in Section 20.19(e) of the Commission's Rules. It does not offer any hearing-aid-compatible handsets. Air Interface Fully Hearing Aid Compatible Number Percent Acoustic Coupling Compatible Only Number Percent Non-Compliant Handsets Number Percent Total by Air Interface You have reported the following handset model summary information. Total number of handsets offered: 1 GSM 1 100% 1 Handset Maker Handset 1: Motorola Timeport 260 Motorola
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/110210/5950529_308.PDF
  • this report being filed by an agent on behalf of a manufacturer or service provider? No Brand Names: Frontier Mobile Do all hearing aid-compatible handsets include labeling? No Product Labeling Explain: We offer two phones, neither of which is hearing aid-compatible. Frontier Mobile is currently being tested on a small scale with only two handset models available. Under 47 CFR 20.19(e) Frontier Mobile qualifies for the de minimus exception because it offers two or fewer handsets. Do all hearing aid-compatible handsets that are capable of voice communication over any air interface or frequency band that does not currently have hearing aid compatibility technical standards have clear and effective disclosure that the handset has not been rated for hearing aid compatibility with
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/120307/6523529_14.PDF
  • $10) and · Smartphone/PDAs (devices that run complete operating system software as a platform for application developers) Report Remarks Carrier may offer certain handsets that are capable of operating on more than one air interface. Carrier currently operates only on the air interface(s) specified below. The Commission has made it clear that the HAC handset phase-in requirements specified in Section 20.19(c)(3) apply only "for each air interface it offers." Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 16753 (2003) at ¶ 53. Moreover, these handset phase-in requirements are triggered only after a service provider has begun offering service using a particular air interface. Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 7171 (2007) at ¶ 60. Page2 of 45 FCC Form 655 December 2010
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/120307/6526410_19.PDF
  • $10) and · Smartphone/PDAs (devices that run complete operating system software as a platform for application developers) Report Remarks Carrier may offer certain handsets that are capable of operating on more than one air interface. Carrier currently operates only on the air interface(s) specified below. The Commission has made it clear that the HAC handset phase-in requirements specified in Section 20.19(c)(3) apply only "for each air interface it offers." Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 16753 (2003) at ¶ 53. Moreover, these handset phase-in requirements are triggered only after a service provider has begun offering service using a particular air interface. Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 7171 (2007) at ¶ 60. Page2 of 45 FCC Form 655 December 2010
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/120307/6535589_37.PDF
  • http://www.mycricket.com/hac Explain: Consumer Outreach Describe consumer outreach efforts in the past 12 months: In addition to providing information on its website regarding HAC handset models, Cricket sales personnel have been made aware of the HAC requirements and the HAC handsets offered by Cricket. Cricket makes HAC handsets available to customers for testing in its retail stores, as required by Section 20.19(c)(4)(i) of the FCC's rules. Methodology for Functionality Levels Cricket offers handsets with a wide range of features and capabilities, and at varying price points. As demonstrated on Cricket's webpage describing its handset models, Cricket's HAC-rated handsets range from basic devices at lower price points, to more feature-rich phones that may include touchscreens, cameras and higher-speed data capabilities (including Smartphones and
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/120307/6536199_38.PDF
  • $10) and · Smartphone/PDAs (devices that run complete operating system software as a platform for application developers) Report Remarks Carrier may offer certain handsets that are capable of operating on more than one air interface. Carrier currently operates only on the air interface(s) specified below. The Commission has made it clear that the HAC handset phase-in requirements specified in Section 20.19(c)(3) apply only "for each air interface it offers." Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 16753 (2003) at ¶ 53. Moreover, these handset phase-in requirements are triggered only after a service provider has begun offering service using a particular air interface. Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 7171 (2007) at ¶ 60. Page2 of 45 FCC Form 655 December 2010
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/120307/6536682_40.PDF
  • than $10) and · Smartphone/PDAs (devices that run complete operating system software as a platform for application developers) Report Remarks Carrier may offer certain handsets that are capable of operating on more than one air interface. Carrier currently operates only on the GSM air interface. The Commission has made it clear that the HAC handset phase-in requirements specified in Section 20.19(c)(3) apply only "for each air interface it offers." Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 16753 (2003) at ¶ 53. Moreover, these handset phase-in requirements are triggered only after a service provider has begun offering service using a particular air interface. Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 7171 (2007) at ¶ 60. Page2 of 45 FCC Form 655 December 2010
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/120307/6537005_42.PDF
  • $10) and · Smartphone/PDAs (devices that run complete operating system software as a platform for application developers) Report Remarks Carrier may offer certain handsets that are capable of operating on more than one air interface. Carrier currently operates only on the air interface(s) specified below. The Commission has made it clear that the HAC handset phase-in requirements specified in Section 20.19(c)(3) apply only "for each air interface it offers." Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 16753 (2003) at ¶ 53. Moreover, these handset phase-in requirements are triggered only after a service provider has begun offering service using a particular air interface. Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 7171 (2007) at ¶ 60. Page2 of 45 FCC Form 655 December 2010
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/120307/6538424_44.PDF
  • than $10) and · Smartphone/PDAs (devices that run complete operating system software as a platform for application developers) Report Remarks Carrier may offer certain handsets that are capable of operating on more than one air interface. Carrier currently operates only on the GSM air interface. The Commission has made it clear that the HAC handset phase-in requirements specified in Section 20.19(c)(3) apply only "for each air interface it offers." Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 16753 (2003) at ¶ 53. Moreover, these handset phase-in requirements are triggered only after a service provider has begun offering service using a particular air interface. Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 7171 (2007) at ¶ 60. Page2 of 45 FCC Form 655 December 2010
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/120307/6538732_45.PDF
  • $10) and · Smartphone/PDAs (devices that run complete operating system software as a platform for application developers) Report Remarks Carrier may offer certain handsets that are capable of operating on more than one air interface. Carrier currently operates only on the air interface(s) specified below. The Commission has made it clear that the HAC handset phase-in requirements specified in Section 20.19(c)(3) apply only "for each air interface it offers." Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 16753 (2003) at ¶ 53. Moreover, these handset phase-in requirements are triggered only after a service provider has begun offering service using a particular air interface. Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 7171 (2007) at ¶ 60. Page2 of 45 FCC Form 655 December 2010
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/120307/6539841_49.PDF
  • than $10) and · Smartphone/PDAs (devices that run complete operating system software as a platform for application developers) Report Remarks Carrier may offer certain handsets that are capable of operating on more than one air interface. Carrier currently operates only on the GSM air interface. The Commission has made it clear that the HAC handset phase-in requirements specified in Section 20.19(c)(3) apply only "for each air interface it offers." Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 16753 (2003) at ¶ 53. Moreover, these handset phase-in requirements are triggered only after a service provider has begun offering service using a particular air interface. Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 7171 (2007) at ¶ 60. Page2 of 45 FCC Form 655 December 2010
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/120307/6544646_63.PDF
  • than $10) and · Smartphone/PDAs (devices that run complete operating system software as a platform for application developers) Report Remarks Carrier may offer certain handsets that are capable of operating on more than one air interface. Carrier currently operates only on the GSM air interface. The Commission has made it clear that the HAC handset phase-in requirements specified in Section 20.19(c)(3) apply only "for each air interface it offers." Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 16753 (2003) at ¶ 53. Moreover, these handset phase-in requirements are triggered only after a service provider has begun offering service using a particular air interface. Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 7171 (2007) at ¶ 60. Page2 of 45 FCC Form 655 December 2010
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/120307/6545079_69.PDF
  • than $10) and · Smartphone/PDAs (devices that run complete operating system software as a platform for application developers) Report Remarks Carrier may offer certain handsets that are capable of operating on more than one air interface. Carrier currently operates only on the GSM air interface. The Commission has made it clear that the HAC handset phase-in requirements specified in Section 20.19(c)(3) apply only "for each air interface it offers." Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 16753 (2003) at ¶ 53. Moreover, these handset phase-in requirements are triggered only after a service provider has begun offering service using a particular air interface. Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 7171 (2007) at ¶ 60. Page2 of 45 FCC Form 655 December 2010
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/120307/6545509_73.PDF
  • than $10) and · Smartphone/PDAs (devices that run complete operating system software as a platform for application developers) Report Remarks Carrier may offer certain handsets that are capable of operating on more than one air interface. Carrier currently operates only on the GSM air interface. The Commission has made it clear that the HAC handset phase-in requirements specified in Section 20.19(c)(3) apply only "for each air interface it offers." Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 16753 (2003) at ¶ 53. Moreover, these handset phase-in requirements are triggered only after a service provider has begun offering service using a particular air interface. Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 7171 (2007) at ¶ 60. Page2 of 45 FCC Form 655 December 2010
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/120307/6547640_92.PDF
  • the State of Iowa. The company provides its service in conjunction with Iowa Wireless Services d/b/a iWireless. The Company operates CMRS facilities but it does not currently have any subscribers, it does not have retail outlets and it does not offer wireless handsets to the public. As such, the Company qualifies for the de minimis exception set forth in Section 20.19 (e) of the Commission's Rules. Do all hearing aid-compatible handsets that are capable of voice communication over any air interface or frequency band that does not currently have hearing aid compatibility technical standards have clear and effective disclosure that the handset has not been rated for hearing aid compatibility with respect to such operations? No Explain: Not applicable. The Company
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/120307/6547669_94.PDF
  • the State of Iowa. The company provides its service in conjunction with Iowa Wireless Services d/b/a iWireless. The Company operates CMRS facilities but it does not currently have any subscribers, it does not have retail outlets and it does not offer wireless handsets to the public. As such, the Company qualifies for the de minimis exception set forth in Section 20.19 (e) of the Commission's Rules. Do all hearing aid-compatible handsets that are capable of voice communication over any air interface or frequency band that does not currently have hearing aid compatibility technical standards have clear and effective disclosure that the handset has not been rated for hearing aid compatibility with respect to such operations? No Explain: Not applicable. The Company
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/120307/6547680_95.PDF
  • the State of Iowa. The company provides its service in conjunction with Iowa Wireless Services d/b/a iWireless. The Company operates CMRS facilities but it does not currently have any subscribers, it does not have retail outlets and it does not offer wireless handsets to the public. As such, the Company qualifies for the de minimis exception set forth in Section 20.19 (e) of the Commission's Rules. Do all hearing aid-compatible handsets that are capable of voice communication over any air interface or frequency band that does not currently have hearing aid compatibility technical standards have clear and effective disclosure that the handset has not been rated for hearing aid compatibility with respect to such operations? No Explain: Not applicable. The Company
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/120307/6547760_96.PDF
  • the State of Iowa. The Company provides its service in conjunction with Iowa Wireless Services d/b/a iWireless. The Company operates CMRS facilities but it does not currently have any subscribers, it does not have retail outlets and it does not offer wireless handsets to the public. As such, the Company qualifies for the de minimis exception set forth in Section 20.19(e) of the Commission's Rules. Do all hearing aid-compatible handsets that are capable of voice communication over any air interface or frequency band that does not currently have hearing aid compatibility technical standards have clear and effective disclosure that the handset has not been rated for hearing aid compatibility with respect to such operations? No Explain: Not applicable. The Company does
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/120307/6548926_98.PDF
  • Website Does your company maintain a public website describing all hearing aid-compatible models, the ratings of those Page1 of 3 FCC Form 655 December 2010 Reference Copy models, and an explanation of the rating system? No Website address: Explain: Service provider is a de minimis service provider and is not required to comply with the HAC requirements pursuant to Section 20.19(e). Consumer Outreach Describe consumer outreach efforts in the past 12 months: Service provider is a de minimis service provider and is not required to comply with the HAC requirements pursuant to Section 20.19(e). Methodology for Functionality Levels Service provider is a de minimis service provider and is not required to comply with the HAC requirements pursuant to Section 20.19(e). Report
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/120307/6549085_100.PDF
  • Although several of the handsets available to customers from the Company via iWireless's website are capable of operating on the WCDMA air interface, the Company only operated on the GSM air interface in the reporting year. The Company did not offer service using the WCDMA air interface in the applicable time period. The HAC handset benchmarks set forth in Section 20.19(c)(3) apply only for each interface actually offered by a carrier, and the HAC handset requirements for a particular interface are triggered only after a service provider has actually started providing service using that air interface. Hearing Aid-Compatible Telephones (Petitions for Waiver of Section 20.19 of the Commission's Rules), Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 7171, para. 60 (2007). Accordingly,
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/120307/6549759_107.PDF
  • than $10) and · Smartphone/PDAs (devices that run complete operating system software as a platform for application developers) Report Remarks Carrier may offer certain handsets that are capable of operating on more than one air interface. Carrier currently operates only on the GSM air interface. The Commission has made it clear that the HAC handset phase-in requirements specified in Section 20.19(c)(3) apply only "for each air interface it offers." Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 16753 (2003) at ¶ 53. Moreover, these handset phase-in requirements are triggered only after a service provider has begun offering service using a particular air interface. Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 7171 (2007) at ¶ 60. Page2 of 45 FCC Form 655 December 2010
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/120307/6555191_144.PDF
  • Although several of the handsets available to customers from the Company via iWireless's website are capable of operating on the WCDMA air interface, the Company only operated on the GSM air interface during the reporting year. The Company did not offer service using the WCDMA air interface during the applicable time period. The HAC handset benchmarks set forth in Section 20.19(c)(3) apply only for each interface actually offered by a carrier, and the HAC handset requirements for a particular interface are triggered only after a service provider has actually started providing service using that air interface. Hearing Aid-Compatible Telephones (Petitions for Waiver of Section 20.19 of the Commission's Rules), Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 7171, para. 60 (2007). Accordingly,
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/120307/6555710_149.PDF
  • wirh more advanced capabilities); Smartphones/PDAs (devices that run complete operating system software as a platform for application developers). Report Remarks Carrier may offer certain handsets that are capable of operating on more than one air interface. Carrier currently operates only on the GSM air interface. The Commission has made it clear that the HAC handset phase-in requirements specified in Section 20.19(c)(3) apply only "for each air interface it offers." Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 16753 (2003) at ¶ 53. Moreover, these handset phase-in requirements are triggered only after a service provider has begun offering service using a particular air interface. Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 7171 (2007) at ¶ 60. Air Interface Fully Hearing Aid Compatible Number Percent
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/120307/6556569_156.PDF
  • Although several of the handsets available to customers from the Company via iWireless's website are capable of operating on the WCDMA air interface, the Company only operated on the GSM air interface in the reporting year. The Company did not offer service using the WCDMA air interface in the applicable time period. The HAC handset benchmarks set forth in Section 20.19(c)(3) apply only for each interface actually offered by a carrier, and the HAC handset requirements for a particular interface are triggered only after a service provider has actually started providing service using that air interface. Hearing Aid-Compatible Telephones (Petitions for Waiver of Section 20.19 of the Commission's Rules), Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 7171, para. 60 (2007). Accordingly,
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/120307/6557673_162.PDF
  • Although several of the handsets available to customers from the Company via iWireless's website are capable of operating on the WCDMA air interface, the Company only operated on the GSM air interface in the reporting year. The Company did not offer service using the WCDMA air interface in the applicable time period. The HAC handset benchmarks set forth in Section 20.19(c)(3) apply only for each interface actually offered by a carrier, and the HAC handset requirements for a particular interface are triggered only after a service provider has actually started providing service using that air interface. Hearing Aid-Compatible Telephones (Petitions for Waiver of Section 20.19 of the Commission's Rules), Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 7171, para. 60 (2007). Accordingly,
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/120307/6559078_177.PDF
  • Functionality Levels Each ahndset model is described by its capabilities regarding features and functionalities. Basic handsets- Entry level handsets that are offered for low cost or free. Featured handsets- Handsets with more advanced capabilities.Smartphones/PDA-Handsets that run complete operating system software as a platform for application developers. Report Remarks Product Labeling: All complaint handsets were labeled in accordance with 47 C.F.R. 20.19 (f) requirements except the following: Sony Z310 - Boxes are not labeled. Company refuses to send labels. Inserts are included in the boxes. Sony W580- Boxes are not labeled. Company refuses to send labels. Inserts are included in the boxes. Clarity Life C900- Boxes are not labeled. Company refuses to send labels. Inserts are included in the boxes. CCM Wireless,
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/120307/6559302_179.PDF
  • Although several of the handsets available to customers from the Company via iWireless's website are capable of operating on the WCDMA air interface, the Company only operated on the GSM air interface during the reporting year. The Company did not offer service using the WCDMA air interface during the applicable time period. The HAC handset benchmarks set forth in Section 20.19(c)(3) apply only for each interface actually offered by a carrier, and the HAC handset requirements for a particular interface are triggered only after a service provider has actually started providing service using that air interface. Hearing Aid-Compatible Telephones (Petitions for Waiver of Section 20.19 of the Commission's Rules), Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 7171, para. 60 (2007). Accordingly,
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/120307/6559906_183.PDF
  • than $10) and · Smartphone/PDAs (devices that run complete operating system software as a platform for application developers) Report Remarks Carrier may offer certain handsets that are capable of operating on more than one air interface. Carrier currently operates only on the GSM air interface. The Commission has made it clear that the HAC handset phase-in requirements specified in Section 20.19(c)(3) apply only "for each air interface it offers." Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 16753 (2003) at ¶ 53. Moreover, these handset phase-in requirements are triggered only after a service provider has begun offering service using a particular air interface. Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 7171 (2007) at ¶ 60. Page2 of 45 FCC Form 655 December 2010
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/120307/6560013_185.PDF
  • Although several of the handsets available to customers from the Company via iWireless's website are capable of operating on the WCDMA air interface, the Company only operated on the GSM air interface during the reporting year. The Company did not offer service using the WCDMA air interface during the applicable time period. The HAC handset benchmarks set forth in Section 20.19(c)(3) apply only for each interface actually offered by a carrier, and the HAC handset requirements for a particular interface are triggered only after a service provider has actually started providing service using that air interface. Hearing Aid-Compatible Telephones (Petitions for Waiver of Section 20.19 of the Commission's Rules), Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 7171, para. 60 (2007). Accordingly,
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/120307/6560476_189.PDF
  • capable of voice communication over any air interface or frequency band that does not currently have hearing aid compatibility technical standards have clear and effective disclosure that the handset has not been rated for hearing aid compatibility with respect to such operations? No Explain: None of the handsets is capable of wi-fi operation without first making hardware changes. Also, Section 20.19(e) exempts De Minimis service providers from Section 20.19 HAC requirements. Public Website Does your company maintain a public website describing all hearing aid-compatible models, the ratings of those Page1 of 3 FCC Form 655 December 2010 Reference Copy models, and an explanation of the rating system? No Website address: Explain: Section 20.19(e) exempts De Minimis service providers from Section 20.19
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/120307/6561024_194.PDF
  • CMRS service provider with operations that utilize the CDMA air interface in the State of Iowa. The Company operates CMRS facilities for the provision of service to roaming customers but it does not have retail outlets and it does not offer wireless handsets to the public. As such, the Company qualifies for the de minimis exception set forth in Section 20.19(e) of the Commission's Rules. Do all hearing aid-compatible handsets that are capable of voice communication over any air interface or frequency band that does not currently have hearing aid compatibility technical standards have clear and effective disclosure that the handset has not been rated for hearing aid compatibility with respect to such operations? No Explain: Not applicable. The Company does
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/120307/6561159_195.PDF
  • Iowa. The Company provides its service in conjunction with Iowa Wireless Services d/b/a iWireless. As noted above, the Company operates CMRS facilities but it does not currently have any subscribers, it does not have retail outlets and it does not offer wireless handsets to the public. As such, the Company qualifies for the de minimis exception set forth in Section 20.19(e) of the Commission's Rules. Do all hearing aid-compatible handsets that are capable of voice communication over any air interface or frequency band that does not currently have hearing aid compatibility technical standards have clear and effective disclosure that the handset has not been rated for hearing aid compatibility with respect to such operations? No Explain: Not applicable. The Company does
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/120307/6561190_196.PDF
  • Although several of the handsets available to customers from the Company via iWireless's website are capable of operating on the WCDMA air interface, the Company only operated on the GSM air interface during the reporting year. The Company did not offer service using the WCDMA air interface during the applicable time period. The HAC handset benchmarks set forth in Section 20.19(c)(3) apply only for each interface actually offered by a carrier, and the HAC handset requirements for a particular interface are triggered only after a service provider has actually started providing service using that air interface. Hearing Aid-Compatible Telephones (Petitions for Waiver of Section 20.19 of the Commission's Rules), Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 7171, para. 60 (2007). Accordingly,
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/120307/6561226_197.PDF
  • has not been rated for hearing aid compatibility with respect to such operations? Yes Explain: Public Website Does your company maintain a public website describing all hearing aid-compatible models, the ratings of those models, and an explanation of the rating system? No Website address: Explain: Not Applicable. The Company qualifies for the HAC de minimis exception set forth in Section 20.19(e) of the Commission's Rules. Consumer Outreach Describe consumer outreach efforts in the past 12 months: While the Company is currently exempt from the Commission's HAC rules, it has undertaken outreach efforts through the preparation of a detailed Hearing Aid Compatibility Information Sheet that will make available to customers that use hearing aids and others who have questions on the subject.
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/120307/6561502_198.PDF
  • Wireless, LLC ("the Company") is a small rural CMRS service provider with operations that utilize the GSM air interface in the State of South Dakota. As noted above, the Company operates CMRS facilities but it currently offers two or fewer wireless handset models to the public. As such, the Company qualifies for the de minimis exception set forth in Section 20.19(e) of the Commission's Rules. Consumer Outreach Describe consumer outreach efforts in the past 12 months: While the Company is currently exempt from the Commission's HAC rules, it has undertaken outreach efforts through the preparation of a detailed Hearing Aid Compatibility Information Sheet that it will make available to customers that use hearing aids and others who have questions on the
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/120307/6561574_199.PDF
  • Describe consumer outreach efforts in the past 12 months: MTA Wireless ensures that all of our sales and service staff are trained to identify hearing aid compatibility for each phone in order to assist customers in their phone selection. In addition, the hearing aid compatibility rating for each phone is clearly provided on our website. Methodology for Functionality Levels Section 20.19(d)(4)(ii) allows service providers to set functionality standards for phones offered. MTA Wireless has set a 4 Level ranking schedule for all phones. Level 1 is for phones with basic features: voice/text. Level 2 is for phones with basic features plus camera, bluetooth and/or internet capabilities. Level 3 is for phones with basic features plus camera, bluetooth and/or internet capabilities. Would
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/120307/6561786_202.PDF
  • than $10) and · Smartphone/PDAs (devices that run complete operating system software as a platform for application developers) Report Remarks Carrier may offer certain handsets that are capable of operating on more than one air interface. Carrier currently operates only on the GSM air interface. The Commission has made it clear that the HAC handset phase-in requirements specified in Section 20.19(c)(3) apply only "for each air interface it offers." Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 16753 (2003) at ¶ 53. Moreover, these handset phase-in requirements are triggered only after a service provider has begun offering service using a particular air interface. Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 7171 (2007) at ¶ 60. Page2 of 45 FCC Form 655 December 2010
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/120307/6562663_215.PDF
  • Website Does your company maintain a public website describing all hearing aid-compatible models, the ratings of those models, and an explanation of the rating system? Website address: Explain: Consumer Outreach Describe consumer outreach efforts in the past 12 months: Not Applicable Methodology for Functionality Levels Not Applicable Report Remarks Consolidated Telcom qualifies for the de minimis exception under Rule Section 20.19(e). It does not offer any hearing-aid-compatible handsets. Air Interface Fully Hearing Aid Compatible Number Percent Acoustic Coupling Compatible Only Number Percent Non-Compliant Handsets Number Percent Total by Air Interface You have reported the following handset model summary information. Total number of handsets offered: 1 GSM 1 100% 1 Handset Maker Handset 1: Motorola Timeport 260 Motorola Handset Model Name FCC
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/120307/6563747_224.PDF
  • the more than 180 handsets supported under Simple Mobile's "bring your own phone" model. As explained in the petition, Simple Mobile conservatively estimates that it currently supports over 44 handsets with an M-3 or better rating and over 26 handsets with a T-3 or better rating. These totals far exceed the maximums required under the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 20.19(c)(3) and 20.19(d)(3). Air Interface Fully Hearing Aid Compatible Number Percent Acoustic Coupling Compatible Only Number Percent Non-Compliant Handsets Number Percent Total by Air Interface You have reported the following handset model summary information. Total number of handsets offered: 10 GSM 6 60% 4 40% 10 Handset Maker Handset 1: Alcatel 880 Alcatel Handset Model Name FCC ID 880 RAD126 Air
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/120307/6564801_242.PDF
  • $10) and · Smartphone/PDAs (devices that run complete operating system software as a platform for application developers) Report Remarks Carrier may offer certain handsets that are capable of operating on more than one air interface. Carrier currently operates only on the air interface(s) specified below. The Commission has made it clear that the HAC handset phase-in requirements specified in Section 20.19(c)(3) apply only "for each air interface it offers." Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 16753 (2003) at ¶ 53. Moreover, these handset phase-in requirements are triggered only after a service provider has begun offering service using a particular air interface. Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 7171 (2007) at ¶ 60. Air Interface Fully Hearing Aid Compatible Number Percent
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/120307/6564888_244.PDF
  • than $10) and · Smartphone/PDAs (devices that run complete operating system software as a platform for application developers) Report Remarks Carrier may offer certain handsets that are capable of operating on more than one air interface. Carrier currently operates only on the GSM air interface. The Commission has made it clear that the HAC handset phase-in requirements specified in Section 20.19(c)(3) apply only "for each air interface it offers." Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 16753 (2003) at ¶ 53. Moreover, these handset phase-in requirements are triggered only after a service provider has begun offering service using a particular air interface. Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 7171 (2007) at ¶ 60. Air Interface Fully Hearing Aid Compatible Number Percent
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/120307/6565268_247.PDF
  • than $10) and · Smartphone/PDAs (devices that run complete operating system software as a platform for application developers) Report Remarks Carrier may offer certain handsets that are capable of operating on more than one air interface. Carrier currently operates only on the GSM air interface. The Commission has made it clear that the HAC handset phase-in requirements specified in Section 20.19(c)(3) apply only "for each air interface it offers." Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 16753 (2003) at ¶ 53. Moreover, these handset phase-in requirements are triggered only after a service provider has begun offering service using a particular air interface. Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 7171 (2007) at ¶ 60. Page2 of 14 FCC Form 655 December 2010
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/120307/6566085_265.PDF
  • Website address: Explain: PVT Wireless Limited Partnership ("the Company") is a small rural CMRS service provider with operations that utilize a UTStarcom PASª wireless access platform. Because the Company offers only one type of digital wireless handset (the UTStarcom model UTS-708j), the Company qualifies for the de minimis exception to the Hearing Aid Compatibility ("HAC") rules, described in Rule Section 20.19 (e)(1). Consumer Outreach Describe consumer outreach efforts in the past 12 months: Not applicable. The Company qualifies for the de minimis exception to the Hearing Aid Compatibility ("HAC") rules, described in Rule Section 20.19 (e)(1). Methodology for Functionality Levels Not applicable. The Company qualifies for the de minimis exception to the Hearing Aid Compatibility ("HAC") rules, described in Rule Section
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/120307/6566788_274.PDF
  • is a small, Tier III Commercial Mobile Radio Service licensee, as defined in the Commission's E-911 Order to Stay, FCC 02-210, released July 26, 2002. The Company's broadband PCS systems employ a GSM air interface. Because the Company offers two or fewer digital wireless handsets in the U.S., the Company qualifies for the de minimis exception set forth in Section 20.19 (e)(1) of the Commission's Rules. Do all hearing aid-compatible handsets that are capable of voice communication over any air interface or frequency band that does not currently have hearing aid compatibility technical standards have clear and effective disclosure that the handset has not been rated for hearing aid compatibility with respect to such operations? No Explain: Not applicable. The Company
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/120307/6566972_275.PDF
  • Outreach Describe consumer outreach efforts in the past 12 months: DNA Methodology for Functionality Levels DNA Report Remarks Licensee offers service to subscribers of carriers that are members of the Rural Independent Network Alliance when they are in the Logan, Utah area. Since Licensee offers fewer than three handsets to public, it qualifies for the de minimis exception in Section 20.19(e) of the Commission's Rules. Air Interface Fully Hearing Aid Compatible Number Percent Acoustic Coupling Compatible Only Number Percent Non-Compliant Handsets Number Percent Total by Air Interface You have reported the following handset model summary information. Total number of handsets offered: 0 This Report has been certified by: Eddie L Cox President 01/17/2012 01:16 PM Certification Page2 of 2 FCC Form
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/120307/6567079_278.PDF
  • Agent Is this report being filed by an agent on behalf of a manufacturer or service provider? No Brand Names: Frontier Mobile Do all hearing aid-compatible handsets include labeling? No Product Labeling Explain: We offered two phones, neither of which was hearing aid-compatible. Frontier Mobile was tested on a small scale with only two handset models available. Under 47 CFR 20.19(e) Frontier Mobile qualifies for the de minimus exception because it offered two or fewer handsets. Do all hearing aid-compatible handsets that are capable of voice communication over any air interface or frequency band that does not currently have hearing aid compatibility technical standards have clear and effective disclosure that the handset has not been rated for hearing aid compatibility with
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/hac_documents/120307/6567289_282.PDF
  • hearing aid-compatible models, the ratings of those Page1 of 2 FCC Form 655 December 2010 Reference Copy models, and an explanation of the rating system? Yes Website address: https://www.airlinkmobile.com/products.php Explain: Consumer Outreach Describe consumer outreach efforts in the past 12 months: Airlink Mobile is de minimis during this Reporting Period; accordingly, Airlink Mobile is exempt from the requirements of Section 20.19 Methodology for Functionality Levels Kajeet/Airlink did not ship any handsets to distributors or end users in 2011. Report Remarks Kajeet/Airlink did not ship any handsets to distributors or end users in 2011. The company ceased shipping all handsets in November 2010. Air Interface Fully Hearing Aid Compatible Number Percent Acoustic Coupling Compatible Only Number Percent Non-Compliant Handsets Number Percent Total
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/index.htm?job=headlines&y=2005
  • for December 7, 2005; Reminder: Pre-Auction Seminar September 28, 2005 [297]pdf - [298]Word 9/20/2005 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (DA 05-2479) Regarding Sainte Partners II, LP - Low Power Television Auction No. 81 [299]pdf - [300]Word 9/16/2005 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (FCC 05-169) Section 68.4(a) of the Commission's Rules Governing Hearing Aid-Compatible Telephones; T-Mobile USA, Inc. Petition for Waiver of Section 20.19(c)(3); Samsung Telecommunications America, L.P. Request for Waiver of Section 20.19(c)(1)(i) [301]pdf - [302]Word Statement of Commissioner Copps: [303]pdf - [304]Word 9/13/2005 LETTER (DA 05-2445) Letter to Colby M. May on Behalf of TCCSA, Inc., d/b/a Trinity Broadcasting Network [305]pdf - [306]Word 9/9/2005 LETTER (DA 05-2437) Petition for Reconsideration of Auction No. 58 Qualified Bidders Public Notice [307]pdf - [308]Word [309]See
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/index.htm?job=headlines&y=2008
  • | [55]July | [56]Aug. | [57]Sep. | [58]Oct. | [59]Nov. | [60]Dec. December 12/31/2008 ORDER (DA 08-2824) AT&T Mobility Spectrum, LLC / Application for 700 MHz Band Licenses, Auction No. 73 [61]pdf - [62]Word 12/31/2008 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (DA 08-2822) Section 68.4(a) of the Commissions's Rules Governing Hearing Aid-Compatible Telephones/ Petition of NEP Cellcorp, Inc. for Waiver of Section 20.19 of the Commission's Rules [63]pdf - [64]Word 12/24/2008 PUBLIC NOTICE (DA 08-2807) WTB Seeks Comment on Request by PTC-220, LLC for Waiver and Extension of Time to Construct and a Request for Other Rule Waivers Regarding Part 90 220 MHz Licenses [65]pdf - [66]Word 12/24/2008 ORDER (DA 08-2806) Garmin International, Inc. Request for Waiver of Sections 95.29(f)(1), 95.119(a)(1), 95.181(a), 95.183(a)(4),
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/wtb/index.htm?job=headlines&y=2005
  • for December 7, 2005; Reminder: Pre-Auction Seminar September 28, 2005 [297]pdf - [298]Word 9/20/2005 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (DA 05-2479) Regarding Sainte Partners II, LP - Low Power Television Auction No. 81 [299]pdf - [300]Word 9/16/2005 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (FCC 05-169) Section 68.4(a) of the Commission's Rules Governing Hearing Aid-Compatible Telephones; T-Mobile USA, Inc. Petition for Waiver of Section 20.19(c)(3); Samsung Telecommunications America, L.P. Request for Waiver of Section 20.19(c)(1)(i) [301]pdf - [302]Word Statement of Commissioner Copps: [303]pdf - [304]Word 9/13/2005 LETTER (DA 05-2445) Letter to Colby M. May on Behalf of TCCSA, Inc., d/b/a Trinity Broadcasting Network [305]pdf - [306]Word 9/9/2005 LETTER (DA 05-2437) Petition for Reconsideration of Auction No. 58 Qualified Bidders Public Notice [307]pdf - [308]Word [309]See
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/wtb/index.htm?job=headlines&y=2008
  • | [55]July | [56]Aug. | [57]Sep. | [58]Oct. | [59]Nov. | [60]Dec. December 12/31/2008 ORDER (DA 08-2824) AT&T Mobility Spectrum, LLC / Application for 700 MHz Band Licenses, Auction No. 73 [61]pdf - [62]Word 12/31/2008 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (DA 08-2822) Section 68.4(a) of the Commissions's Rules Governing Hearing Aid-Compatible Telephones/ Petition of NEP Cellcorp, Inc. for Waiver of Section 20.19 of the Commission's Rules [63]pdf - [64]Word 12/24/2008 PUBLIC NOTICE (DA 08-2807) WTB Seeks Comment on Request by PTC-220, LLC for Waiver and Extension of Time to Construct and a Request for Other Rule Waivers Regarding Part 90 220 MHz Licenses [65]pdf - [66]Word 12/24/2008 ORDER (DA 08-2806) Garmin International, Inc. Request for Waiver of Sections 95.29(f)(1), 95.119(a)(1), 95.181(a), 95.183(a)(4),
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/wtb/index.htm?job=releases_page&y=2005&m=9&t=Order
  • - [69]txt 09/09/2005 WTB Orders (DA 05-2437) Petition for Reconsideration of Auction No. 58 Qualified Bidders Public Notice Denied the Petition for Reconsideration of the Commission's public notice announcing which applicant... DA-05-2437A1: [70]pdf - [71]word - [72]txt 09/08/2005 WTB Orders (FCC 05-166) Section 68.4(a) of the Commission's Rules Governing Hearing Aid-Compatible Telephones; Cingular Wireless LLC Petition for Waiver of Section 20.19(c)(3)(i)(A) of the Commission's Rules FCC provides temporary relief from hearing aid compatibility requirements for Wireless carriers offe... FCC-05-166A1: [73]pdf - [74]word - [75]txt FCC-05-166A2: [76]pdf - [77]word - [78]txt WTB Orders, September - 2005 has 8 Records. Return to Top Arrow [79]Return to Top Last reviewed/updated on 07/16/2012 Wireless Index Categories [80]Sep-2005 News Releases [81]Sep-2005 Notices *** Sep-2005 Orders [82]Sep-2005
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/wtb/index.htm?job=releases_page&y=2008&m=12&t=Order
  • > [36]Releases > Releases [37]FCC Site Map WTB Orders December 2008 2008 Orders: [38]January | [39]February | [40]March | [41]April | [42]May | [43]June | [44]July | [45]August | [46]September | [47]October | [48]November | December 12/31/2008 WTB Orders (DA 08-2822) Section 68.4(a) of the Commissions's Rules Governing Hearing Aid-Compatible Telephones/ Petition of NEP Cellcorp, Inc. for Waiver of Section 20.19 of the Commission's Rules Denied Petition for Waiver filed by NEP Cellcorp, Inc DA-08-2822A1: [49]pdf - [50]word - [51]txt 12/31/2008 WTB Orders (DA 08-2824) AT&T Mobility Spectrum, LLC / Application for 700 MHz Band Licenses, Auction No. 73 Granted the application DA-08-2824A1: [52]pdf - [53]word - [54]txt 12/24/2008 WTB Orders (DA 08-2806) GARMIN INTERNATIONAL, INC. Request for Waiver of Sections
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • 20.70 20.03 20.60 20.63 20.63 21.29 21.29 21.34 21.88 22.98 23.69 Georgia Atlanta 23.44 24.48 24.50 24.50 24.53 24.80 24.98 24.98 24.92 24.92 26.04 26.65 Hawaii Honolulu 19.21 19.29 19.29 19.35 20.60 21.35 22.52 22.40 22.40 22.40 23.28 24.84 Illinois Chicago 18.11 18.17 18.00 18.21 18.20 17.31 17.63 17.18 17.18 14.52 15.52 21.61 Illinois Decatur 19.09 20.29 21.29 21.56 21.54 20.19 20.18 20.18 20.18 22.26 23.26 21.05 Illinois Rock Island 19.85 20.93 21.92 22.18 22.17 20.82 20.82 20.18 20.18 21.85 22.85 20.65 Indiana Indianapolis 22.42 22.47 21.53 21.87 20.44 19.81 18.82 18.82 18.82 19.05 20.25 19.87 Indiana Terre Haute 22.33 22.93 22.93 22.93 23.02 23.02 22.98 22.98 22.98 19.86 22.57 23.26 Iowa Fort Dodge 13.02 13.66 13.79 13.79 14.06 14.06 14.06
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 20.63 21.29 21.29 21.34 21.88 22.98 24.22 25.33 Georgia Atlanta 23.44 24.48 24.50 24.50 24.53 24.80 24.98 24.98 24.92 24.92 26.04 27.25 28.37 Hawaii Honolulu 19.21 19.29 19.29 19.35 20.60 21.35 22.52 22.40 22.40 22.40 23.28 23.28 24.56 Illinois Chicago 18.11 18.17 18.00 18.21 18.20 17.31 17.63 17.18 17.18 14.52 15.52 21.64 21.82 Illinois Decatur 19.09 20.29 21.29 21.56 21.54 20.19 20.18 20.18 20.18 22.26 23.26 21.08 21.15 Illinois Rock Island 19.85 20.93 21.92 22.18 22.17 20.82 20.82 20.18 20.18 21.85 22.85 20.79 20.97 Indiana Indianapolis 22.42 22.47 21.53 21.87 20.44 19.81 18.82 18.82 18.82 19.05 20.25 20.40 20.36 Indiana Terre Haute 22.33 22.93 22.93 22.93 23.02 23.02 22.98 22.98 22.98 19.86 22.57 23.63 24.80 Iowa Fort Dodge 13.02 13.66 13.79
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 16.73 18.15 19.56 20.29 Georgia Albany 20.60 20.63 20.63 21.29 21.29 21.34 21.88 22.98 24.22 25.11 26.25 Georgia Atlanta 24.50 24.53 24.80 24.98 24.98 24.92 24.92 26.04 27.25 28.56 29.54 Hawaii Honolulu 19.35 20.60 21.35 22.52 22.40 22.40 22.40 23.28 23.28 25.34 25.06 Illinois Chicago 18.21 18.20 17.31 17.63 17.18 17.18 14.52 15.52 21.64 24.68 22.38 Illinois Decatur 21.56 21.54 20.19 20.18 20.18 20.18 22.26 23.26 21.08 31.52 29.91 Illinois Rock Island 22.18 22.17 20.82 20.82 20.18 20.18 21.85 22.85 20.79 31.26 29.15 Indiana Indianapolis 21.87 20.44 19.81 18.82 18.82 18.82 19.05 20.25 20.40 20.20 20.21 Indiana Terre Haute 22.93 23.02 23.02 22.98 22.98 22.98 19.86 22.57 23.63 26.21 26.30 Iowa Fort Dodge 13.79 14.06 14.06 14.06 15.96 15.90 15.57 16.49
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • Georgia Albany 20.60 20.63 20.63 21.29 21.29 21.34 21.88 22.98 24.22 25.11 26.25 25.91 Georgia Atlanta 24.50 24.53 24.80 24.98 24.98 24.92 24.92 26.04 27.25 28.56 29.54 28.90 Hawaii Honolulu 19.35 20.60 21.35 22.52 22.40 22.40 22.40 23.28 23.28 25.34 26.35 26.23 Illinois Chicago 18.21 18.20 17.31 17.63 17.18 17.18 14.52 15.52 21.64 24.68 22.12 21.78 Illinois Decatur 21.56 21.54 20.19 20.18 20.18 20.18 22.26 23.26 21.08 31.52 29.15 28.78 Illinois Rock Island 22.18 22.17 20.82 20.82 20.18 20.18 21.85 22.85 20.79 31.26 28.90 28.53 Indiana Indianapolis 21.87 20.44 19.81 18.82 18.82 18.82 19.05 20.25 20.40 20.20 20.21 19.74 Indiana Terre Haute 22.93 23.02 23.02 22.98 22.98 22.98 19.86 22.57 23.63 26.21 25.94 25.95 Iowa Fort Dodge 13.79 14.06 14.06 14.06
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • 19.19 Florida West Palm Beach 16.69 16.50 16.67 16.74 15.65 15.59 15.89 15.89 Georgia Albany 20.30 20.70 20.03 20.60 20.63 20.63 21.29 21.29 Georgia Atlanta 23.44 24.48 24.50 24.50 24.53 24.80 24.98 24.98 Hawaii Honolulu 19.21 19.29 19.29 19.35 20.60 21.35 22.52 22.40 Illinois Chicago 18.11 18.17 18.00 18.21 18.20 17.31 17.63 17.63 Illinois Decatur 19.09 20.29 21.29 21.56 21.54 20.19 20.18 20.18 Illinois Rock Island 19.85 20.93 21.92 22.18 22.17 20.82 20.82 21.27 Indiana Indianapolis 22.42 22.47 21.53 21.87 20.44 19.81 18.82 18.82 Indiana Terre Haute 22.33 22.93 22.93 22.93 23.02 23.02 22.98 22.98 Iowa Fort Dodge 13.02 13.66 13.79 13.79 14.06 14.06 14.06 14.06 Kentucky Louisville 23.33 24.22 24.17 24.17 24.17 23.66 23.66 24.63 Louisiana Baton Rouge 22.65 22.19
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 16.69 16.50 16.67 16.74 15.65 15.59 15.89 15.89 15.60 Georgia Albany 20.30 20.70 20.03 20.60 20.63 20.63 21.29 21.29 21.34 Georgia Atlanta 23.44 24.48 24.50 24.50 24.53 24.80 24.98 24.98 24.92 Hawaii Honolulu 19.21 19.29 19.29 19.35 20.60 21.35 22.52 22.40 22.40 Illinois Chicago 18.11 18.17 18.00 18.21 18.20 17.31 17.63 17.18 17.18 Illinois Decatur 19.09 20.29 21.29 21.56 21.54 20.19 20.18 20.18 20.18 Illinois Rock Island 19.85 20.93 21.92 22.18 22.17 20.82 20.82 20.18 20.18 Indiana Indianapolis 22.42 22.47 21.53 21.87 20.44 19.81 18.82 18.82 18.82 Indiana Terre Haute 22.33 22.93 22.93 22.93 23.02 23.02 22.98 22.98 22.98 Iowa Fort Dodge 13.02 13.66 13.79 13.79 14.06 14.06 14.06 15.96 15.90 Kentucky Louisville 23.33 24.22 24.17 24.17 24.17 23.66 23.66 24.63
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
  • 27.50 2.42 1.14 74.60 21.61 96.21 Kentucky 35.54 5.59 11.21 27.84 1.00 1.17 82.34 21.55 103.89 Louisiana 38.28 5.55 8.31 24.58 1.04 0.79 78.56 23.37 101.93 Maine 26.06 4.81 18.10 27.34 1.65 1.33 79.29 19.24 98.53 Maryland 28.66 5.23 8.34 29.45 1.60 0.84 74.12 23.56 97.68 Massachusetts 26.42 5.51 13.90 29.50 4.42 1.18 80.94 27.32 108.25 Michigan 26.12 4.70 22.25 20.19 2.22 0.89 76.36 25.62 101.98 Minnesota 27.87 5.43 7.50 26.00 3.53 1.15 71.49 27.01 98.50 Mississippi 45.98 5.48 8.19 28.68 1.72 0.91 90.96 25.29 116.25 Missouri 29.66 4.86 11.67 25.34 2.16 1.18 74.88 22.34 97.22 Montana 29.41 5.72 11.19 34.00 1.63 1.29 83.23 23.69 106.92 Nebraska 36.35 5.16 8.95 28.65 2.08 1.28 82.46 30.35 112.81 Nevada 24.01 5.27 2.90 37.51
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-11.pdf
  • WY NA NA NA NA 11 - 22 Table 11.11 2002 Taxes (Federal, State, and Other) ($000) Study Area State Subject to Percent Code Separations Intrastate Interstate Interstate All Reporting Local Exchange Companies $10,267,569 $6,300,348 $3,947,603 38.45% Bell Operating Companies 9,413,836 5,744,482 3,650,920 38.78 Other Reporting Local Exchange Companies 853,733 555,866 296,683 34.75 BellSouth - Alabama AL 204,516 163,212 41,290 20.19 Verizon - California - Contel - Arizona AZ 1,333 859 125 9.38 Qwest - Arizona AZ NA NA NA NA SBC - Southwestern Bell - Arkansas AR 91,150 63,620 27,184 29.82 Verizon - Contel - California CA 42,173 26,298 15,703 37.23 Verizon - NW - West Coast California CA 1,438 1,378 (66) -4.59 Verizon - GTE - California CA 391,552
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • KALONA COOP. TEL. CO. -2.14 1.42 -3.51 -20.21 351217 A KEYSTONE FRMS. COOP. TEL. CO. 1.63 -1.59 3.28 -0.47 351220 A LA PORTE CITY TEL. CO. 9.10 -1.16 10.39 53.77 351222 A LA MOTTE TEL. CO. 9.29 -0.28 9.59 36.38 351223 A LAUREL TEL. CO., INC. -3.21 -7.44 4.57 -2.36 351225 A LEHIGH VALLEY COOP. TEL. ASSN. 4.71 -3.26 8.24 20.19 351228 A LONE ROCK COOP. TEL. CO. -2.33 -5.30 3.14 -4.48 351229 C LOST NATION-ELWOOD TEL. CO. 9.21 -4.61 14.49 18.60 351230 A NORTHEAST IOWA TEL. CO. 7.84 -1.71 9.72 34.60 351232 A LYNNVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY 22.37 24.03 -1.34 5.00 351235 A MANILLA TEL. CO. 9.56 0.16 9.39 33.73 351237 A MARNE & ELK HORN TEL. CO. 3.29 -0.81 4.14
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-4.pdf
  • 8.04 Northern Mariana Is. 11,251 1,249,977 111.10 1,153,276 102.50 96,701 8.59 Ohio 1,838,285 58,096,726 31.60 37,418,971 20.36 20,677,755 11.25 Oklahoma 624,548 36,705,541 58.77 21,320,857 34.14 15,384,684 24.63 Oregon 554,071 13,947,679 25.17 8,685,521 15.68 5,262,158 9.50 Pennsylvania 1,816,747 85,357,896 46.98 60,640,698 33.38 24,717,198 13.61 Puerto Rico 596,502 1,553,836 2.60 306,485 0.51 1,247,351 2.09 Rhode Island 159,205 9,902,576 62.20 6,688,734 42.01 3,213,842 20.19 South Carolina 694,584 68,221,787 98.22 39,275,410 56.55 28,946,377 41.67 South Dakota 128,039 2,866,358 22.39 1,646,764 12.86 1,219,593 9.53 Tennessee 928,000 23,880,306 25.73 14,995,784 16.16 8,884,522 9.57 Texas 4,259,823 264,717,245 62.14 177,084,287 41.57 87,632,958 20.57 Utah 489,072 7,471,621 15.28 5,762,070 11.78 1,709,551 3.50 Vermont 99,978 1,668,603 16.69 1,075,474 10.76 593,129 5.93 Virgin Islands 18,333 1,088,559 59.38 714,038 38.95 374,520 20.43 Virginia
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • 279,741 27.79 19.95 Verizon - New England - Rhode Island RI 394,020 260,148 138,720 35.21 13.49 BellSouth - South Carolina SC 1,136,141 805,795 351,122 30.90 16.95 Verizon - South - Contel - South Carolina SC 25,189 17,550 8,080 32.08 29.28 Verizon - South - Carolina SC 134,951 96,157 45,097 33.42 32.56 Qwest - South Dakota SD 225,146 143,975 82,831 36.79 20.19 BellSouth - Tennessee TN 1,986,903 1,410,801 614,534 30.93 17.58 Sprint - UTC - Southeast - Tennessee TN 172,053 136,263 42,446 24.67 57.93 Verizon - Southwest - Contel - Texas TX 95,689 74,730 25,763 26.92 9.47 Verizon - Southwest - Texas TX 1,161,425 806,077 435,526 37.50 24.04 SBC - Southwestern Bell - Texas TX 8,516,770 6,028,406 2,432,502 28.56 15.22 Sprint -
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2005/dd050909.html
  • AND 47 C.F.R. SECTION 54.201(I). Granted TracFone forbearance from the requirement for eligible telecom carrier designation for Lifeline support only. (Dkt No. 96-45). Action by: By the Commission. Adopted: 09/06/2005 by ORDER. (FCC No. 05-165). WCB [58]FCC-05-165A1.doc [59]FCC-05-165A2.doc [60]FCC-05-165A1.pdf [61]FCC-05-165A2.pdf [62]FCC-05-165A1.txt [63]FCC-05-165A2.txt SECTION 68.4(A) OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES GOVERNING HEARING AID-COMPATIBLE TELEPHONES; CINGULAR WIRELESS LLC PETITION FOR WAIVER OF SECTION 20.19(C)(3)(I)(A) OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES. FCC provides temporary relief from hearing aid compatibility requirements for Wireless carriers offering dual-band GSM handsets. Action by: the Commission. Adopted: 09/07/2005 by MO&O. (FCC No. 05-166).. (Dkt No. 01-309). Action by: the Commission. Adopted: 09/07/2005 by MO&O. (FCC No. 05-166). WTB [64]FCC-05-166A1.doc [65]FCC-05-166A2.doc [66]FCC-05-166A1.pdf [67]FCC-05-166A2.pdf [68]FCC-05-166A1.txt [69]FCC-05-166A2.txt References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260930A1.doc 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260930A1.pdf 3. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260930A1.txt 4.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2007/dd070426.html
  • Erin McGrath at (202) 418-2042 [128]DA-07-1863A1.doc [129]DA-07-1863A2.xls [130]DA-07-1863A3.doc [131]DA-07-1863A4.doc [132]DA-07-1863A5.doc [133]DA-07-1863A1.pdf [134]DA-07-1863A2.pdf [135]DA-07-1863A3.pdf [136]DA-07-1863A4.pdf [137]DA-07-1863A5.pdf [138]DA-07-1863A1.txt [139]DA-07-1863A2.txt [140]DA-07-1863A3.txt [141]DA-07-1863A4.txt [142]DA-07-1863A5.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- IT&E OVERSEAS, INC. Notified IT&E Overseas, Inc. of its Apparent Liability for Forfeiture in the amount of $16,000 for failure to comply with labeling requirements for digital wireless hearing aid-compatible handsets in violation of Section 20.19(f) of the Rules. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 04/25/2007 by NALF. (DA No. 07-1867). EB [143]DA-07-1867A1.doc [144]DA-07-1867A1.pdf [145]DA-07-1867A1.txt VIOLENT TELEVISION PROGRAMMING AND ITS IMPACT ON CHILDREN. A Report on the issue of excessive violent television programming and its impact on children.. (Dkt No. 04-261). Action by: the Commission. Adopted: 04/06/2007 by REPORT. (FCC No. 07-50). MB
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2008/dd080211.html
  • ZOOM-I-NET COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Granted a complaint regarding unauthorized change of subscriber's telecommunications carrier. Action by: Deputy Chief, Consumer Policy Division, Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau. Adopted: 02/08/2008 by ORDER. (DA No. 08-331). CGB [22]DA-08-331A1.doc [23]DA-08-331A1.pdf [24]DA-08-331A1.txt CABLE & COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION D/B/A MID-RIVERS CELLULAR. Notified Mid-Rivers Cellular of its apparent liability for a forfeiture for willful and repeated violations of Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 02/08/2008 by NAL. (DA No. 08-182). EB [25]DA-08-182A1.doc [26]DA-08-182A1.pdf [27]DA-08-182A1.txt ROMAR COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND KM COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Denied the petition for reconsideration. Action by: the Commission. Adopted: 02/07/2008 by MO&O. (FCC No. 08-45). MB [28]FCC-08-45A1.doc [29]FCC-08-45A1.pdf [30]FCC-08-45A1.txt KSBN RADIO, INC. Denied petition for reconsideration concerning construction period
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2008/dd080227.html
  • ELIGIBILITY EVENT APPLICATIONS, AND DESIGNATED ENTITY ANNUAL REPORTS ACTION. WTB [52]DOC-280475A1.pdf [53]DOC-280475A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- STEVEN A. ROY. Adopted the Consent Decree. Action by: Associate Chief, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 02/25/2008 by ORDER. (DA No. 08-455). EB [54]DA-08-455A1.doc [55]DA-08-455A1.pdf [56]DA-08-455A1.txt AST TELECOM, LLC D/B/A BLUE SKY COMMUNICATIONS. Notified of its apparent liability for a $15,000 forfeiture for violating Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules by failing to offer at least two compliant handheld wireless hearing aid compatible phone models by September 18, 2006. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 02/26/2008 by NAL. (DA No. 08-463). EB [57]DA-08-463A1.doc [58]DA-08-463A1.pdf [59]DA-08-463A1.txt WPXI, INC., WJAC-TV, JOHNSTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA. The violation of Section 73.670 of the Commission's Rules does not warrant further
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2008/dd080320.html
  • [66]DA-08-603A1.pdf [67]DA-08-603A1.txt LOCAL TELEPHONE COMPETITION: STATUS AS OF JUNE 30, 2007. MARCH 2008. Action by: Chief, Industry Analysis and Technology Division, Wireline Competition Bureau by REPORT. WCB [68]DOC-280943A1.pdf [69]DOC-280943A1.txt SECTION 68.4(A) OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES GOVERNING HEARING AID-COMPATIBLE TELEPHONES. Denied the Petitions filed by Alaska DigiTel, LLC, Edge Wireless Licenses, LLC, and NE Colorado Cellular, Inc. for Waiver of Section 20.19 of the Commission's Rules. (Dkt No. 01-309). Action by: Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau. Adopted: 03/20/2008 by MO&O. (DA No. 08-589). WTB [70]DA-08-589A1.doc [71]DA-08-589A1.pdf [72]DA-08-589A1.txt * * * * * ADDENDA: THE FOLLOWING ITEMS, RELEASED MARCH 19, 2008, DID NOT APPEAR IN DIGEST NO. 54: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- PUBLIC NOTICES ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- Released: 03/19/2008. CONSUMER & GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS BUREAU SEEKS TO REFRESH
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2008/dd081231.html
  • No. 08-2815). EB [57]DA-08-2815A1.doc [58]DA-08-2815A1.pdf [59]DA-08-2815A1.txt AT&T MOBILITY SPECTRUM, LLC / APPLICATION FOR 700 MHZ BAND LICENSES, AUCTION NO. 73. Granted the application. Action by: Deputy Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau. Adopted: 12/31/2008 by ORDER. (DA No. 08-2824). WTB [60]DA-08-2824A1.doc [61]DA-08-2824A1.pdf [62]DA-08-2824A1.txt SECTION 68.4(A) OF THE COMMISSIONS'S RULES GOVERNING HEARING AID-COMPATIBLE TELEPHONES/ PETITION OF NEP CELLCORP, INC. FOR WAIVER OF SECTION 20.19 OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES. Denied Petition for Waiver filed by NEP Cellcorp, Inc. (Dkt No. 01-309). Action by: Acting Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau. Adopted: 12/30/2008 by MO&O. (DA No. 08-2822). WTB [63]DA-08-2822A1.doc [64]DA-08-2822A1.pdf [65]DA-08-2822A1.txt * * * * * ADDENDA: THE FOLLOWING ITEMS, RELEASED DECEMBER 30, 2008, DID NOT APPEAR IN DIGEST NO. 252: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- NEWS RELEASES ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ---
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2009/dd090226.html
  • the schools and libraries universal service support mechanism, E-Rate program, pursuant to Section 54.8 of the rules. Action by: Chief, Investigations and Hearings Division, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 02/26/2009 by LETTER. (DA No. 09-473). EB [50]DA-09-473A1.doc [51]DA-09-473A1.pdf [52]DA-09-473A1.txt LONG LINES WIRELESS, LLC D/B/A LONG LINES WIRELESS. Adopted a Consent Decree terminating an investigation into whether Long Lines Wireless violated former Section 20.19(d)(2) regarding inductive coupling hearing aid compatibility requirements for wireless handsets. by Consent Decree. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 02/24/2009 by ORDER. (DA No. 09-435). EB [53]DA-09-435A1.doc [54]DA-09-435A1.pdf [55]DA-09-435A1.txt WAYNE STATE COLLEGE. Issued a $7,200 forfeiture to Station KWSC(FM), Wayne, Nebraska. Action by: Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau. Adopted: 02/25/2009 by Forfeiture Order. (DA No. 09-488). MB
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2009/dd090313.html
  • Due: 04/13/2009. Reply Comments Due: 04/28/2009. WCB. Contact: Jennifer Prime at (202) 418-7400 or TTY: (202) 418-0484 [39]DA-09-574A1.doc [40]DA-09-574A1.pdf [41]DA-09-574A1.txt Report No: CWS-09-39 Released: 03/13/2009. ANTENNA STRUCTURE REGISTRATION SERVICE INFORMATION. WTB [42]DOC-289159A1.pdf [43]DOC-289159A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- PINPOINT WIRELESS, INC. Adopted a consent decree terminating an investigation and cancelled an NAL against PinPoint for possible violations of former Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Rules. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 03/09/2009 by ORDER. (DA No. 09-556). EB [44]DA-09-556A1.doc [45]DA-09-556A1.pdf [46]DA-09-556A1.txt ROW 44, INC. Granted a request by Row 44, Inc. for Special Temporary Authority to operate up to twelve Aeronautical Mobile Satellite Service aircraft earth stations for testing, including in-flight testing, for a period of sixty days. Action
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2009/dd090513.html
  • 05/13/2009. PUBLIC SAFETY AND HOMELAND SECURITY BUREAU ASSIGNMENT OF LICENSE AUTHORIZATION APPLICATIONS, TRANSFER OF CONTROL OF LICENSEE APPLICATIONS, AND DE FACTO TRANSFER LEASE APPLICATIONS, AND DESIGNATED ENTITY REPORTABLE ELIGIBILITY EVENT APPLICATIONS ACCEPTED FOR FILING. PSHSB [64]DOC-290678A1.pdf [65]DOC-290678A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- PANHANDLE TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, INC. Adopted a Consent Decree and terminated an investigation into possible violations of former Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Rules regarding inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 05/11/2009 by ORDER. (DA No. 09-1025). EB [66]DA-09-1025A1.doc [67]DA-09-1025A1.pdf [68]DA-09-1025A1.txt TELENATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Adopted a Consent Decree with Telenational Communications, Inc. and terminated the investigation. Action by: Chief, Investigations & Hearings Division, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 05/13/2009 by Consent Decree. (DA
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2009/dd091202.html
  • CONTROL OF LICENSEE APPLICATIONS, AND DE FACTO TRANSFER LEASE APPLICATIONS, AND DESIGNATED ENTITY REPORTABLE ELIGIBILITY EVENT APPLICATIONS ACCEPTED FOR FILING. PSHSB [52]DOC-294921A1.pdf [53]DOC-294921A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- APPLE, INC. Notified Apple, Inc. of its Apparent Liability for Forfeiture in the amount of $5,000 for violation of the wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements contained in Section 20.19(i)(1) of the Rules. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 11/30/2009 by NALF. (DA No. 09-2507). EB [54]DA-09-2507A1.doc [55]DA-09-2507A1.pdf [56]DA-09-2507A1.txt CORNING COMMUNITY COLLEGE. Issued a $500 Forfeiture to Station WCEB(FM), Corning, New York. Action by: Chief, Media Bureau, Audio Division. Adopted: 11/30/2009 by Forfeiture Order. (DA No. 09-2520). MB [57]DA-09-2520A1.doc [58]DA-09-2520A1.pdf [59]DA-09-2520A1.txt BOONE BIBLICAL MINISTRIES, INC. Issued a
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2010/dd100115.html
  • WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU SHORT TERM NETWORK CHANGE NOTIFICATION FILED BY NORTHERN NEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE OPERATIONS LLC D/B/A FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS-NNE. WCB . Contact: Carmell Weathers at (202) 418-2325, email: Carmell.Weathers@fcc.gov; TTY: (202) 418-0484 [24]DOC-295718A1.doc [25]DOC-295718A1.pdf [26]DOC-295718A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- DORO AB. Notified Doro AB of its apparent liability for forfeiture in the amount of $12,000 for violation of Section 20.19(i)(1) of the Rules regarding hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 01/14/2010 by NALF. (DA No. 10-78). EB [27]DA-10-78A1.doc [28]DA-10-78A1.pdf [29]DA-10-78A1.txt ZTE CORPORATION. Notified ZTE Corporation of its apparent liability for forfeiture in the amount of $18,000 for apparently violating the wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements in
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2010/dd100526.html
  • BUREAU ASSIGNMENT OF LICENSE AUTHORIZATION APPLICATIONS, TRANSFER OF CONTROL OF LICENSEE APPLICATIONS, AND DE FACTO TRANSFER LEASE APPLICATIONS, AND DESIGNATED ENTITY REPORTABLE ELIGIBILITY EVENT APPLICATIONS ACCEPTED FOR FILING. PSHSB [58]DOC-298400A1.pdf [59]DOC-298400A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- ECALLPLUS. Issued an Official Citation to eCallPlus for violating the digital wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission Rules. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau by LETTER. (DA No. 10-932). EB [60]DA-10-932A1.doc [61]DA-10-932A1.pdf [62]DA-10-932A1.txt MOVIDA CELLULAR. Issued an Official Citation to Movida Cellular for violating the digital wireless handset hearing aid compatibility filing and publication requirements set forth in sections 20.19(h) and 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules. Action by: Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2010/dd100712.html
  • for operating an unlicensed radio transmitter on the frequency 95.9 MHz in Lauderhill, Florida. Action by: Resident Agent, Miami Office, South Central Region, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 07/08/2010 by NALF. (DA No. 10-1274). EB [12]DA-10-1274A1.doc [13]DA-10-1274A1.pdf [14]DA-10-1274A1.txt FUTUREWEI TECHNOLOGIES, INC., DBA HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES (USA). Adopted a consent decree in this proceeding. Terminated the investigation of Futurewei for possible violation of section 20.19(i) of the rules regarding compliance with the Commission's hearing aid compatibility regulations. Action by: Chief, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 07/09/2010 by Order/Consent Decree. (DA No. 10-1271). EB [15]DA-10-1271A1.doc [16]DA-10-1271A1.pdf [17]DA-10-1271A1.txt JAMES CABLE, LLC. Granted the waiver request. Action by: Chief, Media Bureau. Adopted: 07/12/2010 by MO&O. (DA No. 10-1291). MB [18]DA-10-1291A1.doc [19]DA-10-1291A1.pdf [20]DA-10-1291A1.txt * * * * * ADDENDA: THE FOLLOWING
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2010/dd100831.html
  • 09/14/2010. WCB . Contact: Carmell Weathers at (202) 418-2325, email: Carmell.Weathers@fcc.gov or Kimberly Jackson at (202) 418-7393, email: Kimberly.Jackson@fcc.gov, TTY: (202) 418-0484 [37]DA-10-1660A1.doc [38]DA-10-1660A1.pdf [39]DA-10-1660A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- OK-5 LICENSEE CO., LLC. Notified OK-5 Licensee Co., LLC of its NALF of $15,000 for failure to comply with the hearing aid compatibility handset deployment requirements set forth in Section 20.19 of the Rules. Action by: Chief, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 08/30/2010 by NALF. (DA No. 10-1659). EB [40]DA-10-1659A1.doc [41]DA-10-1659A1.pdf [42]DA-10-1659A1.txt TX-10 LICENSEE, LLC DBA CELLULAR ONE. Notified TX-10 Licensee, LLC dba Cellular One of its NALF of $15,000 for failure to comply with the hearing aid compatibility handset deployment requirements as set forth in Section 20.19 of the Rules. Action by:
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2010/dd101130.html
  • a Consent Decree in this proceeding. Action by: Chief, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 11/29/2010 by Order/Consent Decree. (DA No. 10-2224). EB [31]DA-10-2224A1.doc [32]DA-10-2224A1.pdf [33]DA-10-2224A1.txt EAST BUCHANAN TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE. Notified East Buchanan Telephone Cooperative of its Apparent Liability for Forfeiture in the amount of $45,000 for failure to comply with the hearing aid compatibility handset deployment requirements as set forth in Section 20.19 of the Rules. Action by: Chief, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 11/29/2010 by NALF. (DA No. 10-2250). EB [34]DA-10-2250A1.doc [35]DA-10-2250A1.pdf [36]DA-10-2250A1.txt COX COMMUNICATIONS HAMPTON ROADS, LLC. Granted the petition. Action by: Senior Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau. Adopted: 11/29/2010 by MO&O. (DA No. 10-2246). MB [37]DA-10-2246A1.doc [38]DA-10-2246A1.pdf [39]DA-10-2246A1.txt COXCOM, INC. D/B/A COX COMMUNICATIONS PHOENIX. Granted the petition. Action by: Senior Deputy
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2010/dd101230.html
  • (DA No. 10-2442). (Dkt No 02-55 ). PSHSB . Contact: Brian Marenco at (202) 418-0838, email: Brian.Marenco@fcc.gov [30]DA-10-2442A1.doc [31]DA-10-2442A1.pdf [32]DA-10-2442A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- INDIGO WIRELESS, INC. Notified Indigo Wireless, Inc. of its Apparent Liability for Forfeiture in the amount of $39,000 for failure to comply with the hearing aid compatibility handset deployment requirements as set forth in Section 20.19 of the Rules. Action by: Chief, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 12/29/2010 by NALF. (DA No. 10-2436). EB [33]DA-10-2436A1.doc [34]DA-10-2436A1.pdf [35]DA-10-2436A1.txt ORATEL, INC. Adopted a Consent Decree in this proceeding. Action by: Assistant Division Chief, Telecommunications Consumers Division, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 12/30/2010 by Order/Consent Decree. (DA No. 10-1527). EB [36]DA-10-1527A1.doc [37]DA-10-1527A1.pdf [38]DA-10-1527A1.txt COURTESY COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Adopted a Consent Decree in this proceeding.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2010/ddtoday.html
  • ). WCB . Contact: Tracey Wilson at (202) 418-1394 [12]DA-11-4A1.doc [13]DA-11-4A1.pdf [14]DA-11-4A1.txt * * * * * ADDENDA: THE FOLLOWING ITEMS, RELEASED DECEMBER 30, 2010, DID NOT APPEAR IN DIGEST NO. 251: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- STI PREPAID, LLC. Notified STI Prepaid, LLC of its Apparent Liability for Forfeiture of $34,500 for apparent willful and repeated violations of Section 20.19 of the Commission's Rules concerning Hearing Aid Compatibility for digital wireless handsets. Action by: Chief, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 12/30/2010 by NALF. (DA No. 10-2439). EB [15]DA-10-2439A1.doc [16]DA-10-2439A1.pdf [17]DA-10-2439A1.txt EPIC TOUCH CO., INC. Notified Epic Touch Co., Inc. of its Apparent Liability for Forfeiture in the amount of $19,500 for willful and repeated violation of section 20.19(c)(3)(ii) of the Commission's Rules.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2011/dd110103.html
  • ). WCB . Contact: Tracey Wilson at (202) 418-1394 [12]DA-11-4A1.doc [13]DA-11-4A1.pdf [14]DA-11-4A1.txt * * * * * ADDENDA: THE FOLLOWING ITEMS, RELEASED DECEMBER 30, 2010, DID NOT APPEAR IN DIGEST NO. 251: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- STI PREPAID, LLC. Notified STI Prepaid, LLC of its Apparent Liability for Forfeiture of $34,500 for apparent willful and repeated violations of Section 20.19 of the Commission's Rules concerning Hearing Aid Compatibility for digital wireless handsets. Action by: Chief, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 12/30/2010 by NALF. (DA No. 10-2439). EB [15]DA-10-2439A1.doc [16]DA-10-2439A1.pdf [17]DA-10-2439A1.txt EPIC TOUCH CO., INC. Notified Epic Touch Co., Inc. of its Apparent Liability for Forfeiture in the amount of $19,500 for willful and repeated violation of section 20.19(c)(3)(ii) of the Commission's Rules.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2011/dd111227.html
  • its Apparent Liability for Forfeiture in the amount of $30,000 for violations of the hearing aid compatibility handset deployment requirements. Action by: Chief, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 12/23/2011 by NALF. (DA No. 11-2035). EB [28]DA-11-2035A1.doc [29]DA-11-2035A1.pdf [30]DA-11-2035A1.txt CAPROCK CELLULAR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP. Proposed a forfeiture in the amount of $15,000 against Caprock Cellular Limited Partnership for apparently willfully and repeatedly violating section 20.19(c)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules. Action by: Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 12/23/2011 by NAL. (DA No. 11-2060). EB [31]DA-11-2060A1.doc [32]DA-11-2060A1.pdf [33]DA-11-2060A1.txt ISMART MOBILE, LLC D/B/A BIG SKY MOBILE. Proposed a forfeiture in the amount of $21,000 against iSmart Mobile, LLC d/b/a Big Sky Mobile for apparently willfully and repeatedly violating section 20.19(c)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules. Action
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2011/dd111229.html
  • FOR WAIVER OF SECTION 15.712(B) TO REGISTER CERTAIN TV RECEIVE SITES IN THE TV BANDS DATABASE. (DA No. 11-2086). (Dkt No 04-186 ). Comments Due: 01/30/2012. Reply Comments Due: 02/14/2012. OET [35]DA-11-2086A1.doc [36]DA-11-2086A1.pdf [37]DA-11-2086A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- NEP CELLCORP, INC. Notified NEP Cellcorp, Inc. of its Apparent Liability for a Forfeiture of $25,500 for apparent violation of section 20.19(c)(3)(ii) of the Rules. Action by: Chief, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 12/28/2011 by NALF. (DA No. 11-2079). EB [38]DA-11-2079A1.doc [39]DA-11-2079A1.pdf [40]DA-11-2079A1.txt GENERAL COMMUNICATION, INC. Notified General Communication, Inc. of its Apparent Liability for a Forfeiture in the amount of $51,000 for apparently willfully and repeatedly violating section 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Rules. Action by: Chief, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 12/28/2011 by NALF. (DA No.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2011/dd111230.html
  • (DA No. 11-2093). MB [20]DA-11-2093A1.doc [21]DA-11-2093A1.pdf [22]DA-11-2093A1.txt * * * * * ADDENDA: THE FOLLOWING ITEMS, RELEASED DECEMBER 29, 2011, DID NOT APPEAR IN DIGEST NO. 250: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- LOCUS TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. Proposed a forfeiture in the amount of $25,500 and issued an admonishment against Locus Telecommunications, Inc., finding that Locus apparently willfully and repeatedly violated sections 20.19(c)(3)(ii)and 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Rules. Action by: Chief, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 12/28/2011 by NAL. (DA No. 11-2078). EB [23]DA-11-2078A1.doc [24]DA-11-2078A1.pdf [25]DA-11-2078A1.txt CENTENNIAL COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION. Notified Centennial Communications Corporation of its Apparent Liability for a Forfeiture in the amount of $75,000 for apparently willfully and repeatedly violating sections 20.19(d)(3)(ii) and 20.19(e)(2) of the Rules. Action by: Chief, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 12/28/2011 by
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2012/dd120103.html
  • 03/14/2012. WTB CGB . Contact: Genevieve Ross at (202) 418-1305 or Rosaline Crawford at (202) 418-2075 [5]DA-12-1A1.doc [6]DA-12-1A1.pdf [7]DA-12-1A1.txt * * * * * ADDENDA: THE FOLLOWING ITEMS, RELEASED DECEMBER 30, 2011, DID NOT APPEAR IN DIGEST NO. 251: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- CERTAIN NOTICES OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE AND CITATIONS ISSUED FOR VIOLATIONS OF 47 C.F.R. SECTION 20.19(H) AND 47 C.F.R. SECTION 20.19(I). Issued Order regarding certain Notices of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Citations issued for Violations of 47 C.F.R. Section 20.19(h) and 47 C.F.R. Section 20.19(i). Action by: Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 12/30/2011 by ORDER. (DA No. 11-2097). EB [8]DA-11-2097A1.doc [9]DA-11-2097A1.pdf [10]DA-11-2097A1.txt APPLICATIONS OF VERIZON WIRELESS AND LEAP WIRELESS FOR COMMISSION CONSENT
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-1867A1.html
  • of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: April 25, 2007 Released: April 25, 2007 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find IT&E Overseas, Inc. ("IT&E") apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of sixteen thousand dollars ($16,000) for its willful and repeated violations of Section 20.19(f) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). The apparent violations involve IT&E's failure to comply with the labeling requirements for digital wireless hearing aid-compatible handsets. II. Background 2. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission took a number of actions to further the ability of persons with hearing disabilities to access digital wireless telecommunications. Among other actions, the Commission required
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-2118A1.html
  • Pine Cellular Phones, Inc. FRN # 0001699776 ) Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: May 21, 2007 Released: May 22, 2007 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Pine Telephone Company d/b/a Pine Cellular Phones, Inc. ("Pine") apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(f) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by failing to comply with the labeling requirements for digital wireless hearing aid-compatible handsets. For Pine's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of sixteen thousand dollars ($16,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission took a number of actions to further
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-3524A1.html
  • Litchfield County Cellular, Inc. d/b/a Ramcell of Kentucky, and Litchfield County Cellular, Inc. d/b/a Ramcell of Oregon ("Ramcell Licensees"). The Consent Decree terminates the Bureau's investigations into the Ramcell Licensees' compliance with the Enhanced 911 requirements set forth in Section 20.18(g)(1)(i)-(v) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), and the hearing aid compatibility requirements for digital wireless handsets set forth in Section 20.19(c)(2) of the Rules. 2. The Enforcement Bureau and the Ramcell Licensees have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve these matters and terminate the investigations. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. Based on the record before us, we conclude that no substantial or material questions of fact exist with
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-4339A1.html
  • ) Blue Sky Communications FRN # 0007435902 ) Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: October 18, 2007 Released: October 22, 2007 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that AST Telecom, LLC d/b/a Blue Sky Communications ("Blue Sky") apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(f) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by failing to comply with the labeling requirements for digital wireless hearing aid-compatible handsets. For Blue Sky's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of eight thousand dollars ($8,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission took a number of actions to
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-4481A1.html
  • No. 200832100004 Association, Inc. ) FRN # 0001607175 ) Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: October 31, 2007 Released: November 1, 2007 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that South Central Utah Telephone Association, Inc. ("South Central") apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(f) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by failing to comply with the labeling requirements for digital wireless hearing aid-compatible handsets. For South Central's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-four thousand dollars ($24,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission took a number of actions to
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2007/DA-07-4745A1.html
  • By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Memorandum Opinion and Order, we admonish XIT Telecommunications & Technology, Ltd. d/b/a XIT Cellular ("XIT") for failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings two handset models that meet the hearing aid compatibility requirements for radio frequency interference by September 16, 2005 in violation of Section 20.19(c)(2)(i)(B)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). II. BACKGROUND 2. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission took a number of actions to further the ability of persons with hearing disabilities to access digital wireless telecommunications. Among other actions, the Commission required manufacturers and digital wireless service providers to collectively take steps to increase the number of hearing aid-compatible handset
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1157A1.html
  • Inc. ) FRN No. 0001623321 ) ORDER Adopted: May 19, 2008 Released: May 21, 2008 By the Deputy Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Custer Telephone Cooperative, Inc. ("Custer"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Custer for possible violations of section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") regarding the inductive coupling hearing aid compatibility requirements. 2. The Bureau and Custer have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve these matters. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1186A1.html
  • Choice Wireless, LC ) FRN No. 0004250056 ) ORDER Adopted: June 2, 2008 Released: June 10, 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Choice Wireless, LC ("Choice"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Choice for possible violation of section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") regarding the inductive coupling hearing aid compatibility requirements. 2. The Bureau and Choice have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1291A1.html
  • Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: June 2, 2008 Released: June 4, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Farmers Cellular Telephone, Inc. ("Farmers Cellular"), a Global System for Mobile Communications ("GSM") carrier serving rural Alabama, apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by September 18, 2006. For Farmers Cellular's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of thirty thousand dollars ($30,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. In
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1314A1.html
  • forfeiture of sixty thousand dollars ($60,000) against SunCom Wireless, Inc. ("SunCom"), a Global System for Mobile Communications-based ("GSM-based") Tier II carrier, serving most of North and South Carolina, parts of the bordering states of Virginia, Tennessee and Georgia ("mainland"), and Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. As detailed herein, we find that SunCom apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by the September 18, 2006 deadline. II. BACKGROUND 2. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of individuals with hearing disabilities to
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1369A1.html
  • apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: June 9, 2008 Released: June 11, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Union Telephone Company ("Union"), a Global System for Mobile Communications-based ("GSM") carrier serving rural Wyoming, Colorado, Utah, and Idaho, apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings, by September 18, 2006, at least two models that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility. For Union's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. In the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1398A1.html
  • 0002377901 ) Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: June 11, 2008 Released: June 13, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that PinPoint Wireless, Inc. ("PinPoint"), a Global System for Mobile Communications-based ("GSM") carrier serving rural Nebraska, apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by September 18, 2006. For PinPoint's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of thirty thousand dollars ($30,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. In the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1423A1.html
  • ) Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: June 16, 2008 Released: June 18, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Blanca Telephone Company ("Blanca"), a Code Division Multiple Access-based ("CDMA-based") Tier III carrier, serving rural Colorado, apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by the September 18, 2006 deadline. For Blanca's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000). II. BACKGROUND 2.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1424A1.html
  • In the Matter of ) NAL/Acct. No. 200832100055 Centennial Communications Corp. ) FRN No. 0003296480 ) Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: June 17, 2008 Released: June 17, 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Centennial Communications Corp. ("Centennial") apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models for the GSM air interface in its mainland wireless network that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by September 18, 2006. For Centennial's apparent violation, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-14A1.html
  • No. 200832100009 ) Company, L.P. FRN # 0004285698 ) Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: January 2, 2008 Released: January 3, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that South Canaan Cellular Communications Company, L.P. ("South Canaan") apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by September 18, 2006. For South Canaan's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. In
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1625A1.html
  • No. 0015360456 ) ORDER Adopted: July 11, 2008 Released: July 14, 2008 By the Deputy Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and NE Colorado Cellular, Inc., dba Viaero Wireless ("Viaero"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Viaero for possible violation of section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") regarding inductive coupling hearing aid compatibility handset requirements. 2. The Bureau and Viaero have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1716A1.html
  • ) FRN No. 0002701688 ) ORDER Adopted: July 30, 2008 Released: August 1, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Airadigm Communications, Inc. ("Airadigm"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Airadigm for possible violations of section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") regarding the inductive coupling hearing aid compatibility requirements. 2. The Bureau and Airadigm have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1719A1.html
  • 2008 Released: July 28, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and IT&E Overseas, Inc. ("IT&E"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation and a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL") by the Bureau against IT&E for possible violations of section 20.19(f) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") regarding IT&E's failure to comply with the labeling requirements for digital wireless hearing aid-compatible handsets, and an investigation by the Bureau against IT&E for possible violations of section 20.19(d)(2) of the Rules regarding IT&E's failure to offer at least two digital wireless handset models meeting the Commission's standards for inductive coupling by the compliance deadline.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-1828A1.html
  • NAL/Acct. No. 200832100064 Corr Wireless Communications, LLC ) FRN # 0003804101 ) Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: July 31, 2008 Released: July 31, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Corr Wireless Communications, LLC ("Corr") apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by September 18, 2006. For Corr's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of thirty thousand dollars ($30,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. In the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-182A1.html
  • ) dba Mid-Rivers Cellular FRN # 0001634443 ) Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: February 8, 2008 Released: February 11, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Cable & Communications Corporation dba Mid-Rivers Cellular ("Mid-Rivers Cellular") apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by September 18, 2006. For Mid-Rivers Cellular's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. In
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2451A1.html
  • of six thousand dollars ($6,000). We also admonish ASTCA for failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two handset models that meet the hearing aid compatibility requirements for radio frequency interference and two handset models that meet the hearing aid compatibility requirements for inductive coupling capability by the compliance deadlines in apparent violation of former Sections 20.19(c)(2)(i)(B)(1) and 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). II. BACKGROUND 2. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of individuals with hearing disabilities to access digital wireless telecommunications. The Commission established technical standards that digital wireless handsets must meet to be considered compatible with hearing aids operating in acoustic coupling and inductive
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-463A1.html
  • No. 200832100017 Communications ) FRN # 0007435902 ) Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: February 26, 2008 Released: February 27, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that AST Telecom, LLC d/b/a Blue Sky Communications ("Blue Sky") apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by September 18, 2006. For Blue Sky's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of fifteen thousand hundred dollars ($15,000). II. BACKGROUND 2.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-535A1.html
  • Inc. ) FRN # 0005769302 ) Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: March 7, 2008 Released: March 11, 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that CTC Telecom, Inc. ("CTC"), a Code Division Multiple Access-based ("CDMA-based") carrier serving rural Idaho, apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by September 18, 2006. For CTC's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of thirty thousand dollars ($30,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. In the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-537A1.html
  • ) ) ORDER Adopted: March 17, 2008 Released: March 19, 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Pine Telephone Company, Inc. d/b/a Pine Cellular Phones, Inc. ("Pine"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Pine for possible violations of section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") regarding the inductive coupling hearing aid compatibility requirements and an investigation and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture against Pine for possible violations of section 20.19(f) of the Rules regarding the hearing aid compatibility labeling requirements. 2. The Bureau and Pine have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve these matters. A copy
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-555A1.html
  • Luis Obispo ) FRN # 0001650324 ) Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: March 12, 2008 Released: March 13, 2008 By the Deputy Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that SLO Cellular, Inc. d/b/a Cellular One of San Luis Obispo ("SLO Cellular") apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Sections 20.19(c)(2)(i)(B)(1) and 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models that meet the radio frequency interference and inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by the applicable deadline. For SLO Cellular's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of forty-five thousand
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-603A1.html
  • 19, 2008 Released: March 20, 2008 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that South Slope Cooperative Telephone Company, d/b/a South Slope Wireless ("South Slope"), a Global System for Mobile Communications ("GSM") Tier III carrier serving parts of Iowa, apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by September 18, 2006. For South Slope's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. In
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-610A1.html
  • the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Iowa Wireless Services, LLC dba i wireless ("i wireless"), a Global System for Mobile Communications ("GSM") carrier encompassing 37 associated Personal Communications Services ("PCS") licensees providing service in Iowa and western Illinois, apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by failing to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by September 18, 2006. For i wireless's apparent violations, and for the reasons discussed below, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-two thousand five hundred dollars ($22,500). II. BACKGROUND
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-785A1.html
  • April 7, 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Cable & Communications Corporation dba Mid-Rivers Cellular ("Mid-Rivers Cellular"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL") by the Bureau against Mid-Rivers Cellular for possible violation of Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") regarding its failure to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least two models that meet the inductive coupling standards for hearing aid compatibility by September 18, 2006. 2. The Bureau and Mid-Rivers Cellular have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-914A1.html
  • LLC ) FRN No. 0004119483 ) ORDER Adopted: May 7, 2008 Released: May 9, 2008 By the Deputy Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Edge Wireless Licenses, LLC ("Edge"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Edge for possible violations of section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") regarding the inductive coupling hearing aid compatibility requirements. 2. The Bureau and Edge have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-920A1.html
  • ) FRN No. 0001766179 ) ORDER Adopted: April 21, 2008 Released: April 23, 2008 By the Deputy Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Alaska DigiTel, LLC ("Alaska DigiTel"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Alaska DigiTel for possible violation of section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") regarding the inductive coupling hearing aid compatibility requirements. 2. The Bureau and Alaska DigiTel have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-435A1.html
  • 24, 2009 Released: February 26, 2009 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Long Lines Wireless, LLC d/b/a Long Lines Wireless ("Long Lines"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation of Long Lines by the Bureau for possible violations of former Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") regarding the inductive coupling hearing aid compatibility requirements. 2. The Bureau and Long Lines have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-556A1.html
  • 2009 Released: March 13, 2009 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and PinPoint Wireless, Inc. ("PinPoint"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL") by the Bureau against PinPoint for possible violations of former Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") regarding the inductive coupling hearing aid compatibility requirements. 2. The Bureau and PinPoint have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-1271A1.html
  • FRN No. 0016162539 ) ORDER Adopted: July 9, 2010 Released: July 12, 2010 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Futurewei Technologies, Inc. d/b/a Huawei Technologies (USA) ("Huawei"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against Huawei for possible violations of Section 20.19(i) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), regarding compliance with the Commission's regulations pertaining to hearing aid compatibility for wireless handsets. 2. The Bureau and Huawei have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-1321A1.html
  • Date, and twenty-four (24) months after the Effective Date. Each Compliance Report shall include a certification by the Compliance Officer, as an agent of and on behalf of Qomo, stating that the Compliance Officer has personal knowledge that Qomo (i) has established operating procedures intended to ensure compliance with the terms and conditions of this Consent Decree and with section 20.19 of the Rules, together with an accompanying statement explaining the basis for the Compliance Officer's certification; (ii) has been utilizing those procedures since the previous Compliance Report was submitted; and (iii) is not aware of any instances of non-compliance. The certification must comply with section 1.16 of the Rules and be subscribed to as true under penalty of perjury in
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-1654A1.html
  • Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we propose a forfeiture of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000) against Oklahoma Independent RSA 5 Partnership ("Oklahoma Independent"), a Global System for Mobile Communications-based ("GSM-based") Tier III carrier, serving parts of Oklahoma. As detailed herein, we find that Oklahoma Independent apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(c)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"), by failing to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of digital wireless handsets that met or exceeded the radio frequency interference standards for hearing aid compatibility set forth in Section 20.19(b)(1). II. BACKGROUND 2. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of consumers with
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-1657A1.html
  • the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we propose a forfeiture of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000) against TX-10 Licensee, LLC dba Cellular One ("TX-10"), a Global System for Mobile Communications-based ("GSM-based") Tier III carrier, serving parts of Texas. As detailed herein, we find that TX-10 apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(c)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"), by failing to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of digital wireless handsets that met or exceeded the radio frequency interference standards for hearing aid compatibility set forth in Section 20.19(b)(1). II. BACKGROUND 2. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of consumers with
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-1659A1.html
  • the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we propose a forfeiture of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000) against OK-5 Licensee Co., LLC ("OK-5 Licensee"), a Global System for Mobile Communications-based ("GSM-based") Tier III carrier, serving parts of Oklahoma. As detailed herein, we find that OK-5 Licensee apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(c)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"), by failing to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of digital wireless handsets that met or exceeded the radio frequency interference standards for hearing aid compatibility set forth in Section 20.19(b)(1). II. BACKGROUND 2. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of consumers with
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2040A1.html
  • forfeiture Adopted: October 25, 2010 Released: October 26, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Total Call Mobile, Inc. ("TCM"), a reseller of mobile wireless services, apparently willfully violated the wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in Section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated the public web site posting requirements set forth in Section 20.19(h) of the Rules. For these apparent violations, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of twelve thousand dollars ($12,000). We also direct TCM to file the required wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report within thirty (30) days
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2041A1.html
  • forfeiture Adopted: October 25, 2010 Released: October 26, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that IDT Telecom, Inc. ("IDT Telecom"), a reseller of digital wireless services, apparently willfully violated the wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in Section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated the public web site posting requirements set forth in Section 20.19(h) of the Rules. For these apparent violations, we propose a total forfeiture in the amount of twelve thousand dollars ($12,000). We also direct IDT Telecom to file the required wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report within thirty
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2046A1.html
  • 2010 Released: October 26, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that MGA Entertainment, Inc. ("MGA"), a reseller of wireless services through its Bratz Mobile phone offering, apparently willfully violated the wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in Section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). For this apparent violation, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of six thousand dollars ($6,000). We also direct MGA to file the required wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report within thirty (30) days of the release of this NAL. II. BACKGROUND 2. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2049A1.html
  • October 26, 2010 Released: October 26, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Cbeyond Communications, LLC ("Cbeyond") d/b/a Beyond Mobile, a reseller of mobile wireless services, apparently willfully violated the wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in Section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated the public web site posting requirements set forth in Section 20.19(h) of the Rules. For these apparent violations, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of twelve thousand dollars ($12,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2226A1.html
  • forfeiture Adopted: November 22, 2010 Released: November 22, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Lightyear Network Solutions, LLC ("Lightyear"), a reseller of mobile wireless services, apparently willfully violated the wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in Section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated the public web site posting requirements set forth in Section 20.19(h) of the Rules. For these apparent violations, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of twelve thousand dollars ($12,000). We also direct Lightyear to file the required wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report within thirty (30) days
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2250A1.html
  • the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we propose a forfeiture of forty-five thousand dollars ($45,000) against East Buchanan Telephone Cooperative ("East Buchanan"), a Global System for Mobile Communications-based ("GSM-based") Tier III carrier serving parts of Iowa. As detailed herein, we find that East Buchanan apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 20.19(c)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"), by failing to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of digital wireless handsets that met or exceeded the radio frequency interference standards for hearing aid compatibility set forth in section 20.19(b)(1), and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Rules, by failing to offer to consumers the required number or percentage
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2378A1.html
  • Cellular, LLC ) FRN No. 0019130319 ) ORDER Adopted: December 23, 2010 Released: December 27, 2010 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Maximum Communications Cellular, LLC ("MaxCell"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau against MaxCell for possible violations of Section 20.19(c)(3)(ii) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") regarding the commercial availability of digital wireless handset models meeting the radio frequency standard for hearing aid compatibility, and for possible violations of Section 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Rules regarding the commercial availability of digital wireless handset models meeting the inductive coupling standard for hearing aid compatibility. 2. The Bureau and MaxCell have negotiated the terms
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2428A1.html
  • 30, 2010 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we propose a forfeiture of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000) against Sandhill Communications ("Sandhill"), a Global System for Mobile Communications-based ("GSM-based") Tier III carrier, serving parts of South Carolina. As detailed herein, we find that Sandhill apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 20.19(c)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"), by failing to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of digital wireless handsets that met or exceeded the radio frequency interference standards for hearing aid compatibility set forth in section 20.19(b)(1) of the Rules. II. BACKGROUND 2. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2435A1.html
  • Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that the Champaign Telephone Company d/b/a CT Communications, Inc., a reseller of mobile wireless services through its operating division, CT Wireless (collectively, "CT Communications"), apparently willfully violated the wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). For this apparent violation, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of six thousand dollars ($6,000). We also direct CT Communications to file the required wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report within thirty (30) days after the release of this NAL. II. BACKGROUND 2. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2436A1.html
  • Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we propose a forfeiture of thirty-nine thousand dollars ($39,000) against Indigo Wireless, Inc. ("Indigo Wireless"), a Global System for Mobile Communications-based ("GSM-based") Tier III carrier serving parts of New York and Pennsylvania. As detailed herein, we find that Indigo Wireless apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 20.19(c)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"), by failing to offer to consumers for nine months the required number or percentage of digital wireless handsets that met or exceeded the radio frequency interference standards for hearing aid compatibility set forth in section 20.19(b)(1) of the Rules. II. BACKGROUND 2. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2439A1.html
  • FRN 0016004731 ) Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: December 30, 2010 Released: December 30, 2010 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that STi Prepaid, LLC, a reseller of wireless services through its operating division, STi Mobile (collectively, "STi Prepaid"), apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 20.19(e)(2) of the Commission's rules ("Rules") by failing for 18 months to include in its digital wireless handset offerings at least one handset model that meets the inductive coupling standard for hearing aid compatibility set forth in section 20.19(b)(2) of the Rules. Further, we find that STi Prepaid apparently willfully violated the hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2440A1.html
  • I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we propose a forfeiture of nineteen thousand five hundred dollars ($19,500) against Epic Touch Co., Inc. ("Epic Touch"), a Global System for Mobile Communications-based ("GSM-based") Tier III carrier, serving parts of Kansas and Oklahoma. As detailed herein, we find that Epic Touch apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 20.19(c)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"), by failing to offer to consumers for nine months the required number or percentage of digital wireless handsets that met or exceeded the radio frequency interference standards for hearing aid compatibility set forth in section 20.19(b)(1) of the Rules. II. BACKGROUND 2. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-77A1.html
  • for forfeiture Adopted: January 14, 2010 Released: January 14, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that ACS Wireless, Inc. ("ACSW"), a subsidiary of Alaska Communications Systems, apparently willfully violated the wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in Section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated the public web site posting requirements set forth in Section 20.19(h) of the Rules. For these apparent violations, we propose a total forfeiture in the amount of twelve thousand dollars ($12,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-78A1.html
  • ) Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: January 14, 2010 Released: January 14, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Doro AB ("Doro") apparently willfully and repeatedly violated the wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in Section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). For this apparent violation, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of twelve thousand dollars ($12,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of individuals with hearing disabilities to access digital wireless telecommunications. The Commission established technical standards that digital wireless handsets must
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-79A1.html
  • apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: January 14, 2010 Released: January 14, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that East Kentucky Network, LLC d/b/a Appalachian Wireless ("East Kentucky Network") apparently willfully violated the hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in Section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). For this apparent violation, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of five thousand dollars ($5,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of individuals with hearing disabilities to access digital wireless telecommunications. The Commission established technical standards that digital wireless handsets must
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-80A1.html
  • ) Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: January 14, 2010 Released: January 14, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that ZTE Corporation ("ZTE") apparently willfully and repeatedly violated the wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in Section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") and the public web site posting requirements set forth in Section 20.19(h) of the Rules. For these apparent violations, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of eighteen thousand dollars ($18,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of individuals with hearing disabilities
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-81A1.html
  • subsidiary of TCL Communication ) Technology Holdings Ltd. FRN 0009221672 ) ) Notice OF apparent liability for forfeiture Adopted: January 14, 2010 Released: January 14, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that TCT Mobile Limited ("TCT Mobile") apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), which requires the filing of status reports regarding the hearing aid compatibility of wireless handsets. We also find that TCT Mobile apparently willfully violated a Commission order by failing to respond to a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") from the Enforcement Bureau. Based on our review of facts and circumstances in this matter, we conclude that
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-82A1.html
  • Suite 401 Miami Beach, FL 33139 Re: File No. EB-09-SE-154 Dear Mr. Barutcu: This is an official CITATION, issued to Firefly Mobile Communications, Inc. ("Firefly"), a reseller of wireless services, pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), for violating the digital wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject Firefly to monetary forfeitures. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of individuals with hearing disabilities to access digital wireless telecommunications. The Commission established technical standards that digital wireless handsets must meet
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-83A1.html
  • for forfeiture Adopted: January 14, 2010 Released: January 14, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Locus Telecommunications, Inc. ("Locus"), a reseller of digital wireless services, apparently willfully violated the wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in Section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") and apparently willfully and repeatedly violated the public web site posting requirements set forth in Section 20.19(h) of the Rules. For these apparent violations, we propose a total forfeiture in the amount of twelve thousand dollars ($12,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-84A1.html
  • Notice of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: January 14, 2010 Released: January 14, 2010 By the Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Airo Wireless, Inc. ("Airo") apparently willfully and repeatedly violated the wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in Section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). For this apparent violation, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of twelve thousand dollars ($12,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of individuals with hearing disabilities to access digital wireless telecommunications. The Commission established technical standards that digital wireless handsets must
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-85A1.html
  • Support Center, One Arts Plaza 1722 Routh Street, Suite 1000 Dallas, Texas 75201-2506 Re: File No. EB-09-SE-167 Dear Mr. Hennen: This is an official CITATION, issued to 7-Eleven, Inc. ("7-Eleven") pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), for violating the digital wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), and the public web site posting requirements set forth in section 20.19(h) of the Rules. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject 7-Eleven to monetary forfeitures. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of individuals with hearing disabilities to
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-930A1.html
  • Road Suite 300 Portland, Oregon 97224-7574 Re: File No. EB-09-SE-175 Dear Mr. Marick: This is an official CITATION, issued to Consumer Cellular, Inc. ("Consumer Cellular"), a reseller of wireless services, pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), for violating the digital wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject Consumer Cellular to monetary forfeitures. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of individuals with hearing disabilities to access digital wireless telecommunications. The Commission established technical standards that digital wireless handsets must
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-931A1.html
  • Road Bloomfield Hills, Michigan 48302-0336 Re: File No. EB-09-SE-168 Dear Mr. Bahri: This is an official CITATION issued to Air Voice Wireless, LLC ("Air Voice"), a reseller of wireless services, pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), for violating the digital wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), and the public web site posting requirements set forth in section 20.19(h) of the Rules. We also find that Air Voice violated a Commission order by failing to respond to a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") from the Enforcement Bureau. As explained below, continued violations of the Commission's rules and the Act in this regard will
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-932A1.html
  • Owner eCallPlus 1523 N. Oakmont Drive Vernon Hills, Illinois 60061 Re: File No. EB-09-SE-173 Dear Ms. Kang: This is an official CITATION, issued to eCallPlus, a reseller of wireless services, pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), for violating the digital wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject eCall to monetary forfeitures. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of individuals with hearing disabilities to access digital wireless telecommunications. The Commission established technical standards that digital wireless handsets must meet
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-933A1.html
  • Box 52085 Phoenix, Arizona 85072-2085 Re: File No. EB-09-SE-174 Dear Mr. O'Toole: This is an official CITATION issued to Circle K Stores, Inc. ("Circle K"), a reseller of wireless services, pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), for violating the digital wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject Circle K to monetary forfeitures. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of individuals with hearing disabilities to access digital wireless telecommunications. The Commission established technical standards that digital wireless handsets must
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-934A1.html
  • Parklawn Drive, Suite U Rockville MD 20852 Re: File No. EB-09-SE-182 Dear Sir or Madam: This is an official CITATION issued to Movida Cellular ("Movida"), a reseller of wireless services, pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), for violating the digital wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's rules ("rules"), and the public web site posting requirements set forth in section 20.19(h) of the rules. We also find that Movida violated a Commission order by failing to respond to an Enforcement Bureau Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") directing Movida to provide certain information and documents concerning its compliance with the digital wireless handset hearing aid compatibility
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-935A1.html
  • Dr. #310 San Diego, CA 92130-2004 Re: File No. EB-09-SE-177 Dear Ms. Herrick: This is an official CITATION issued to GreatCall, Inc., d/b/a Jitterbug ("Jitterbug"), a reseller of wireless services, pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), for violating the digital wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject Jitterbug to monetary forfeitures. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of individuals with hearing disabilities to access digital wireless telecommunications. The Commission established technical standards that digital wireless handsets must meet
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-937A1.html
  • Parklawn Drive, Suite U Rockville MD 20852 Re: File No. EB-09-SE-179 Dear Sir or Madam: This is an official CITATION issued to Liberty Wireless ("Liberty"), a reseller of wireless services, pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), for violating the digital wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's rules ("rules"), and the public web site posting requirements set forth in section 20.19(h) of the rules. We also find that Liberty violated a Commission order by failing to respond to an Enforcement Bureau Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") directing Liberty to provide certain information and documents concerning its compliance with the digital wireless handset hearing aid compatibility
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-938A1.html
  • 8108 S. Roberts Road Justice, Illinois 60458 Re: File No. EB-09-SE-185 Dear Mr. Ahmad: This is an official CITATION, issued to PlatinumTel Communications, LLC ("PlatinumTel"), a reseller of wireless services, pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), for violating the digital wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report filing requirements set forth in section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), and the public web site posting requirements set forth in section 20.19(h) of the Rules. As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject PlatinumTel to monetary forfeitures. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order, the Commission adopted several measures to enhance the ability of individuals with hearing disabilities to
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011.html
  • > [12]EB > Orders [13]site map Search the FCC: _______________ Submit [14]Help | [15]Advanced | [16]Share [17]2012 Orders [18]2010 Orders [19]2009 Orders [20]2008 Orders [21]2007 Orders [22]2006 Orders [23]2005 Orders [24]2004 Orders [25]2003 Orders [26]2002 Orders [27]2001 Orders [28]2000 Orders [29]1999 Orders 12-30-2011 ORDER [30]Certain Notices of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Citations Issued for Violations of 47 C.F.R. S: 20.19(h) and 47 C.F.R. S: 20.19(i) 12-29-2011 NAL [31]Metropolitan Telecommunications Holding Company d.b.a. MetTel 12-29-2011 NAL [32]Locus Telecommunications, Inc. 12-29-2011 NAL [33]Centennial Communications Corporation, wholly-owned subsidiary of AT&T, Inc. 12-28-2011 NAL [34]NEP Cellcorp, Inc. 12-28-2011 NAL [35]Maximum Communications Cellular, LLC 12-28-2011 NAL [36]General Communication, Inc. 12-23-2011 NAL [37]iSmart Mobile, LLC d/b/a Big Sky Mobile 12-23-2011 NAL [38]North Central Wireless LC d/b/a
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1002A1.html
  • Bell Wireless LLC ) FRN: 0003010493 ) ) ORDER Adopted: June 9, 2011 Released: June 9, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Cincinnati Bell Wireless LLC ("CBW"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Bureau regarding CBW's compliance with section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's rules pertaining to the deployment of digital wireless hearing aid-compatible handsets. 2. The Bureau and CBW have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1641A1.html
  • Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we propose a forfeiture of nineteen thousand five hundred dollars ($19,500) against Kaplan Telephone Company, Inc. d/b/a Pace Communications ("Pace"), a Global System for Mobile Communications-based ("GSM-based") Tier III carrier, serving Vermilion Parish, Louisiana. As detailed herein, we find that Pace apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules ("Rules") by failing to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of digital wireless handset models that met or exceeded the radio frequency interference standards for hearing aid compatibility set forth in section 20.19(b)(1) of the Rules, and that this apparent misconduct continued for seven consecutive months in 2010. II. BACKGROUND 2. In the 2003
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1809A1.html
  • October 28, 2011 Released: October 28, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we propose a forfeiture in the amount of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) against Keystone Wireless, LLC d.b.a. Immix Wireless ("Keystone Wireless"). As detailed herein, we find that Keystone Wireless apparently willfully and repeatedly violated sections 20.19(c)(3)(ii) and 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). We further find that some of the apparent misconduct continued for more than 11 of the 12 months in the reporting period. Specifically, Keystone Wireless apparently failed to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset models as set forth in the Rules. These hearing aid compatibility
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1812A1.html
  • 28, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we propose a forfeiture in the amount of eighty two thousand five hundred dollars ($82,500) against Missouri RSA 5 Partnership d/b/a Chariton Valley Wireless Services ("Chariton Valley"). As detailed herein, we find that Chariton Valley apparently willfully and repeatedly violated sections 20.19(c)(3)(ii) and 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). We further find that some of the apparent misconduct continued for 10 of the 12 months in the 2010 reporting period. Specifically, Chariton Valley apparently failed to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset models as set forth in the Rules. The hearing aid compatibility requirements
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1844A1.html
  • Inc. ) FRN: 0004334538 ) ORDER Adopted: November 8, 2011 Released: November 9, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") of the Federal Communications Commission and OTZ Telecommunications, Inc. ("OTZ"). The Consent Decree resolves and terminates the Bureau's investigation into OTZ's compliance with section 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules concerning the deployment of digital wireless hearing aid-compatible handsets. These hearing aid compatibility requirements serve to ensure that consumers with hearing loss have access to advanced telecommunications services. 2. The Bureau and OTZ have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-1973A1.html
  • Adopted: December 14, 2011 Released: December 14, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") of the Federal Communications Commission and Cross Wireless, L.L.C. d/b/a Sprocket Wireless, L.L.C. ("Cross Wireless"). The Consent Decree resolves and terminates the Bureau's investigation into Cross Wireless's compliance with sections 20.19(c)(3)(ii) and 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules concerning the deployment of digital wireless hearing aid-compatible handsets. These hearing aid compatibility requirements serve to ensure that consumers with hearing loss have access to advanced telecommunications services. 2. The Bureau and Cross Wireless have negotiated the Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-2034A1.html
  • December 23, 2011 Released: December 23, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we propose a forfeiture in the amount of thirty-nine thousand dollars ($39,000) against North Central Wireless LC d/b/a i wireless ("North Central"). As detailed herein, we find that North Central apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). We further find that the apparent misconduct continued for seven consecutive months during the 2010 reporting period. Specifically, North Central apparently failed to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset models as set forth in the Rules. These hearing aid compatibility requirements serve to ensure that consumers with
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-2035A1.html
  • for forfeiture Adopted: December 23, 2011 Released: December 23, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we propose a forfeiture in the amount of thirty thousand dollars ($30,000) against Affordable Phone Services, Inc. ("Affordable Phone"). As detailed herein, we find that Affordable Phone apparently willfully and repeatedly violated sections 20.19(c)(3)(ii) and 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). Specifically, Affordable Phone apparently failed to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset models as set forth in the Rules. These hearing aid compatibility requirements serve to ensure that consumers with hearing loss have access to advanced telecommunications services. II. BACKGROUND 2. In the 2003 Hearing
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-2042A1.html
  • Released: December 23, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Admonishment ("NAL"), we propose a forfeiture in the amount of thirty thousand dollars ($30,000) and issue an admonishment against Airadigm Communications, Inc. dba Airfire Wireless ("Airadigm"). As detailed herein, we find that Airadigm apparently willfully and repeatedly violated sections 20.19(c)(3)(ii) and 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). Specifically, Airadigm apparently failed to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset models as set forth in the Rules. These hearing aid compatibility requirements serve to ensure that consumers with hearing loss have access to advanced telecommunications services. II. BACKGROUND 2. In the 2003 Hearing Aid
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-2060A1.html
  • Adopted: December 23, 2011 Released: December 23, 2011 By the Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we propose a forfeiture in the amount of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000) against Caprock Cellular Limited Partnership ("Caprock"). As detailed herein, we find that Caprock apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 20.19(c)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). Specifically, Caprock apparently failed to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset models as set forth in the Rules. These hearing aid compatibility requirements serve to ensure that consumers with hearing loss have access to advanced telecommunications services. II. BACKGROUND 2. In the 2003 Hearing Aid Compatibility Order,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-2061A1.html
  • December 23, 2011 By the Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we propose a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-one thousand dollars ($21,000) against iSmart Mobile, LLC d/b/a Big Sky Mobile ("Big Sky"). As detailed herein, we find that Big Sky apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 20.19(c)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). We further find that the apparent misconduct continued for the entire 2010 calendar year. Specifically, Big Sky apparently failed to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset models as set forth in the Rules. These hearing aid compatibility requirements serve to ensure that consumers with hearing loss have
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-2075A1.html
  • of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: December 28, 2011 Released: December 28, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we propose a forfeiture in the amount of fifty-one thousand dollars ($51,000) against General Communication, Inc. ("GCI"). As detailed herein, we find that GCI apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). We further find that this apparent misconduct continued for seven consecutive months during the 2010 calendar year. Specifically, GCI apparently failed to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset models that operate on the GSM air interface as set forth in the Rules. These hearing aid compatibility requirements
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-2076A1.html
  • of apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: December 28, 2011 Released: December 29, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we propose a forfeiture in the amount of seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000) against Centennial Communications Corporation ("Centennial"). As detailed herein, we find that Centennial apparently willfully and repeatedly violated sections 20.19(d)(3)(ii) and 20.19(e)(2) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). Specifically, Centennial apparently failed to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset models that operate on the GSM and WCDMA air interfaces as set forth in the Rules. These hearing aid compatibility requirements serve to ensure that consumers with hearing loss have access to advanced telecommunications
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-2077A1.html
  • for forfeiture Adopted: December 29, 2011 Released: December 29, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we propose a forfeiture in the amount of forty-eight thousand dollars ($48,000) against Metropolitan Telecommunications Holding Company d.b.a. MetTel ("Metropolitan"). As detailed herein, we find that Metropolitan apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). We further find that this apparent misconduct continued for the entire 2010 calendar year. Specifically, Metropolitan apparently failed to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset models that operate on the WCDMA and GSM air interfaces as set forth in the Rules. These hearing aid compatibility requirements serve
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-2078A1.html
  • 28, 2011 Released: December 29, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Admonishment, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand five hundred dollars ($25,500) and issue an admonishment against Locus Telecommunications, Inc. ("Locus"). As detailed herein, we find that Locus apparently willfully and repeatedly violated sections 20.19(c)(3)(ii) and 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). We further find that some of this apparent misconduct continued for the entire 2010 calendar year. Specifically, Locus apparently failed to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset models that operate on the GSM air interface as set forth in the Rules. These hearing aid compatibility
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-2079A1.html
  • Liability for forfeiture Adopted: December 28, 2011 Released: December 28, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we propose a forfeiture in the amount of twenty-five thousand five hundred dollars ($25,500) against NEP Cellcorp, Inc. ("NEP"). As detailed herein, we find that NEP apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 20.19(c)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). We further find that this apparent misconduct continued for five consecutive months during the 2010 calendar year. Specifically, NEP apparently failed to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset models as set forth in the Rules. These hearing aid compatibility requirements serve to ensure that consumers with hearing
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-2080A1.html
  • apparent Liability for forfeiture Adopted: December 28, 2011 Released: December 28, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. introduction 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we propose a forfeiture in the amount of thirty thousand dollars ($30,000) against Maximum Communications Cellular, LLC ("MaxCell"). As detailed herein, we find that MaxCell apparently willfully and repeatedly violated section 20.19(c)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules ("Rules"). Specifically, MaxCell apparently failed to offer to consumers the required number or percentage of hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset models that operate on the GSM and WCDMA air interfaces as set forth in the Rules. These hearing aid compatibility requirements serve to ensure that consumers with hearing loss have access to advanced telecommunications services. II.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-257A1.html
  • Adopted: February 17, 2011 Released: February 17, 2011 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and Pantech Co., Ltd. and its wholly owned U.S.-based subsidiary, Pantech Wireless, Inc. (together "Pantech"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation initiated by the Bureau regarding Pantech's compliance with sections 20.19(h) and (i) of the Commission's rules concerning the wireless handset hearing aid compatibility web site posting and hearing aid compatibility status reporting requirements, and sections 20.19(c)(1) and (d)(1) of the Commission's rules pertaining to the hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset deployment requirements. 2. The Bureau and Pantech have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would resolve this matter.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-3A1.html
  • 19, 2011 By the Acting Chief, Spectrum Enforcement Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") and ACS Wireless, Inc. ("ACSW"). The Consent Decree terminates an investigation by the Bureau and cancels the Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL") issued against ACSW for possible violations of Sections 20.19 (h) and (i)(1) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"), regarding compliance with the Commission's regulations pertaining to hearing aid compatibility for wireless handsets. 2. The Bureau and ACSW have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2011/DA-11-802A1.html
  • corrective measures are not sufficient to avoid enforcement action."). Forfeiture Order, 2011 WL 742240, at *3, para. 8. See e.g., Champaign Tel. Co. D/B/A CT Commc'ns, Inc., Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 25 FCC Rcd 17814, 17818-19, para. 9 (Spec. Enf. Div. 2010) (construing a failure to file the hearing aid compatibility status report required under section 20.19(i)(1) of the Commission's rules as "a continuing violation that continues until . . . cured"); STI Prepaid, 25 FCC Rcd at 17845, para. 20 (same); Lightyear Network Solutions, LLC, Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 25 FCC Rcd 16212, 16217, para. 12 (Spec. Enf. Div. 2010) (same); Alpheus Commc'ns, LP, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 25 FCC
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2012/DA-12-285A1.html
  • 0005599634 ) ORDER Adopted: February 27, 2012 Released: February 27, 2012 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (Bureau) of the Federal Communications Commission and Epic Touch Co., Inc. (Epic Touch). The Consent Decree resolves and terminates the Bureau's investigation into Epic Touch's compliance with Section 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's rules (Rules) concerning the deployment of digital wireless hearing aid-compatible handsets. The hearing aid compatibility requirements serve to ensure that consumers with hearing loss have access to advanced telecommunications services. 2. The Bureau and Epic Touch have negotiated the Consent Decree that resolves this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated herein
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2012/DA-12-628A1.html
  • FRN: 0010723591 ) ) ORDER Adopted: May 11, 2012 Released: May 11, 2012 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (Bureau) of the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) and Ztar Mobile, Inc. (Ztar). The Consent Decree resolves and terminates the Bureau's investigations into Ztar's compliance with Section 20.19(d)(3)(ii) of the Commission's rules (Rules) concerning the deployment of digital wireless hearing aid-compatible handsets and with Section 222 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the Act), Section 64.2009(e) of the Rules, and the EPIC CPNI Order, concerning the filing of an annual Customer Proprietary Network Information certification. 2. The Bureau and Ztar have negotiated the Consent Decree that
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2012/FCC-12-39A1.html
  • NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE Adopted: April 13, 2012 Released: April 13, 2012 By the Commission: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of eight hundred nineteen thousand dollars ($819,000) against T-Mobile USA, Inc. (T-Mobile). As detailed herein, we find that T-Mobile apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Sections 20.19(c)(2) and 20.19(d)(2) of the Commission's rules (Rules). We further find that this apparent misconduct persisted for the two-year period, 2009-2010. Specifically, T-Mobile, a nationwide wireless carrier with more than 33 million customers and more than $21 billion dollars in annual revenue, apparently failed to offer the required number of hearing aid-compatible digital wireless handset models as set forth in the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-10-93A1.html
  • joann.lucanik@fcc.gov of the Enforcement Bureau. For general information on the wireless hearing aid compatibility rules, contact Michael Rowan, (202) 418-1883, Michael.Rowan@fcc.gov, or Weiren Wang, (202) 418-7275, Weiren.Wang@fcc.gov. Media inquiries should be directed to David Fiske, david.fiske@fcc.gov, (202) 418-0513. Issued by: Chief, Enforcement Bureau -FCC- The full text of the hearing aid compatibility rules is set forth at 47 C.F.R. S: 20.19. These rules include technical standards that digital wireless handsets must meet to be considered compatible with hearing aids operating in acoustic coupling and inductive coupling (telecoil) modes, and establish deadlines by which manufacturers and wireless service providers, including resellers and Mobile Virtual Network Operators, are required to offer specified numbers or percentages of handsets per air interface that comply with