FCC Web Documents citing 27.1188
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1120A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1120A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1120A1.txt
- CTIA Ex Parte, filed October 19, 2006. See WCA comments at 3 (the process of moving BRS incumbents in the 2.1 GHz band, including the reimbursement of displaced BRS incumbents for their relocation costs, is a separate process from the allocation of responsibility for those costs among multiple AWS licensees who benefit from the relocation). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 27.1172, 27.1188 (emphasis added). See also 47 C.F.R. § 27.1178 (the clearinghouse(s) will administer the cost-sharing plan by inter alia, determining the cost sharing obligation of AWS entities for the relocation of BRS incumbents from the 2150-2162 MHz band). We note that CTIA and PCIA are each required to follow the conditions and terms of any separate agreement (MOU) concerning the resolution
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-45A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-45A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-45A1.txt
- or modified existing site in licensed bands overlapping the 2150-2160/62 MHz band, the AWS licensee must file with the clearinghouse, in addition to the site-specific data required by § 27.1170, the above ground level height of the transmitting antenna centerline. AWS entities have a continuing duty to maintain the accuracy of the site-specific data on file with the clearinghouse. § 27.1188 Dispute resolution under the Cost-Sharing Plan (a) Disputes arising out of the cost-sharing plan, such as disputes over the amount of reimbursement required, must be brought, in the first instance, to the clearinghouse for resolution. To the extent that disputes cannot be resolved by the clearinghouse, parties are encouraged to use expedited Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) procedures, such as binding