FCC Web Documents citing 32.16
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1435A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1435A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1435A1.txt
- March 29, 2001, and May 16, 2001, respectively. The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS 133 in June 1998. A derivative is a collective term for securities whose prices are based on the prices of another underlying investment. Examples of derivative instruments are interest rate swaps, foreign currency exchange rate swaps, and futures and options contracts. 47 C.F.R. § 32.16. Section 32.16 provides that carriers shall apply new FASB standards and that a new standard automatically becomes effective 90 days after the Commission is notified of intent to adopt unless the Commission determines that the standard should not be adopted. See, e.g., letters of intent to adopt SFAS 133 filed by Verizon and SBC Communications, Inc. See 47 C.F.R. §
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3562A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3562A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3562A1.txt
- or not an actual legal obligation exists. The accounting required by SFAS 143, therefore, is not only inconsistent with the Commission's accounting rules, but its implementation also could require revision of prescribed depreciation rates. It is the Commission's policy to incorporate changes in generally accepted accounting principles into its regulatory accounting, unless the changes conflict with its regulatory objectives. Section 32.16 of the Commission's rules, Changes in Accounting Standards, provides for automatic adoption of new FASB standards unless the Commission notifies carriers that a new standard should not be adopted within 90 days after receiving notification. After reviewing SFAS 143, we conclude that its adoption for federal accounting purposes would conflict with the Commission's current accounting rules. Accordingly, we are notifying
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1651A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1651A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1651A1.txt
- not plan to adopt the new standard for the Commission's regulatory accounting purposes, however, because it believes the new accounting required in SFAS 144 conflicts with the Commission's accounting rules prescribed in Part 32. It is the Commission's policy to incorporate changes in generally accepted accounting principles into its regulatory accounting, unless the changes conflict with its regulatory objectives. Section 32.16 of the Commission's rules, Changes in Accounting Standards, provides for automatic adoption of new FASB standards unless the Commission notifies carriers that a new standard should not be adopted within 90 days after receiving notification. The Commission's rules do not provide a method to write down the cost of an asset or group of assets that will continue in use
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1652A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1652A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1652A1.txt
- ) ) WCB/Pricing 03-20 ORDER Adopted: May 14, 2003 Released: May 14, 2003 By the Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau: On February 14, and February 19, 2003, respectively, SBC Communications, Inc. (SBC) and Verizon filed notices of intent to adopt four Statements of the Financial Accounting Standards Board for regulatory accounting purposes. SBC and Verizon filed these notices pursuant to section 32.16 of the Commission's rules, which requires carriers to apply new standards adopted by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and provides for automatic Commission approval within 90 days unless the Commission notifies carriers otherwise. It is the Commission's policy to incorporate changes in generally accepted accounting principles into its regulatory accounting unless the changes conflict with its regulatory objectives. In
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2508A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2508A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2508A1.txt
- Bureau: On June 24, 2005, BellSouth, on behalf of an industry coalition consisting of BellSouth Corporation (BellSouth), SBC Communications, Inc. (SBC), Qwest International Communications, Inc. (Qwest), and Verizon Communications, Inc. (Verizon) filed notices of intent to adopt seven Statements of the Financial Accounting Standards Board for regulatory accounting purposes. BellSouth, SBC, Qwest, and Verizon filed these notices pursuant to section 32.16 of the Commission's rules, which requires carriers to apply new standards adopted by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and provides for automatic Commission approval within 90 days unless the Commission notifies carriers otherwise. It is the Commission's policy to incorporate changes in generally accepted accounting principles into its regulatory accounting unless the changes conflict with its regulatory objectives. In
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
- 289,131 32.00 Valor - Oklahoma OK 76,851 52,220 24,631 32.05 Verizon - Northwest - Oregon OR 311,909 184,014 127,895 41.00 Qwest - Oregon OR 783,822 480,730 303,091 38.67 Sprint - United Tel. Co. of the Northwest - Oregon OR 52,018 34,868 17,151 32.97 ALLTEL - Pennsylvania PA 150,008 110,902 39,106 26.07 Verizon - North - Contel/Pennsylania PA 40,363 27,384 12,979 32.16 Verizon - North - Contel/Quaker State PA 27,375 18,734 8,641 31.57 Verizon - North - Pennsylvania PA 305,439 203,058 102,381 33.52 Verizon - Pennsylvania PA 3,185,832 1,947,408 1,238,424 38.87 Sprint - United Telephone Co. of Pennsylvania PA 266,963 193,434 73,529 27.54 Verizon - Puerto Rico Telephone Company - Central PR 95,878 64,330 31,548 32.90 Verizon - Puerto Rico Telephone Company
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A13.txt
- 289,131 32.00 Valor - Oklahoma OK 76,851 52,220 24,631 32.05 Verizon - Northwest - Oregon OR 311,909 184,014 127,895 41.00 Qwest - Oregon OR 783,822 480,730 303,091 38.67 Sprint - United Tel. Co. of the Northwest - Oregon OR 52,018 34,868 17,151 32.97 ALLTEL - Pennsylvania PA 150,008 110,902 39,106 26.07 Verizon - North - Contel/Pennsylania PA 40,363 27,384 12,979 32.16 Verizon - North - Contel/Quaker State PA 27,375 18,734 8,641 31.57 Verizon - North - Pennsylvania PA 305,439 203,058 102,381 33.52 Verizon - Pennsylvania PA 3,185,832 1,947,408 1,238,424 38.87 Sprint - United Telephone Co. of Pennsylvania PA 266,963 193,434 73,529 27.54 Verizon - Puerto Rico Telephone Company - Central PR 95,878 64,330 31,548 32.90 Verizon - Puerto Rico Telephone Company
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
- CenturyTel of Alabama, LLC - Southern Alabama AL 91,096 67,327 23,769 26.09 BellSouth - Alabama AL 1,020,762 709,996 310,158 30.38 Verizon California - Contel - Arizona AZ 7,311 6,476 1,235 16.89 Qwest - Arizona AZ 1,383,460 885,752 497,799 35.98 AT&T - Southwestern Bell - Arkansas AR 543,914 392,417 152,432 28.03 Verizon California - Contel - California CA 237,709 161,762 76,456 32.16 Citizens Telecom. of California - Shasta - California CA 71,029 57,056 13,973 19.67 Verizon - Northwest - West Coast California CA 10,179 7,737 2,447 24.04 Verizon California - GTE - California CA 2,200,937 1,549,851 654,464 29.74 AT&T - Pacific Telesis - Pacific Bell - California CA 6,881,260 4,887,550 1,997,018 29.02 SureWest Telephone CA 87,621 63,536 24,708 28.20 Qwest - Colorado
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A13.txt
- CenturyTel of Alabama, LLC - Southern Alabama AL 91,096 67,327 23,769 26.09 BellSouth - Alabama AL 1,020,762 709,996 310,158 30.38 Verizon California - Contel - Arizona AZ 7,311 6,476 1,235 16.89 Qwest - Arizona AZ 1,383,460 885,752 497,799 35.98 AT&T - Southwestern Bell - Arkansas AR 543,914 392,417 152,432 28.03 Verizon California - Contel - California CA 237,709 161,762 76,456 32.16 Citizens Telecom. of California - Shasta - California CA 71,029 57,056 13,973 19.67 Verizon - Northwest - West Coast California CA 10,179 7,737 2,447 24.04 Verizon California - GTE - California CA 2,200,937 1,549,851 654,464 29.74 AT&T - Pacific Telesis - Pacific Bell - California CA 6,881,260 4,887,550 1,997,018 29.02 SureWest Telephone CA 87,621 63,536 24,708 28.20 Qwest - Colorado
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
- 8.94 4.52 16.12 15.56 57 Citizens Comms Cos. dba Citizens Comms FCC Tariff 4 (CTC4) 49.91 42.796 35.38 23.31 13.08 30.94 58 Frontier Telephone of Rochester 14.03 55.896 10.67 11.47 12.32 18.91 16.77 18.37 59 Frontier Tier 2 Concurring Companies 50.77 11.456 38.49 33.34 38.12 38.95 43.42 45.45 60 Frontier Comms of Minnesota & Frontier Comms of Iowa 25.12 33.676 32.16 31.15 25.24 33.16 35.40 29.28 61 Citizens Telecommunications Cos. (CTC5) 40.37 4.90 0.86 (11.23) 62 Hawaiian Telecom 21.88 9.44716.96 15.30 16.72 17.87 17.62 15.64 63 Iowa Telecom Service Group 19.36 17.306 17.585 14.264 13.07 64 Iowa Telecom Systems Service Group 19.14 20.16 23.975 20.474 18.45 65 Micronesian Telecommunications Corp. 37.67 43.526733.91 32.75 21.83 23.58 29.24 34.45 66 Valor New Mexico
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
- 4 (CTC4) 56.69 57.95 42.796 35.38 23.31 13.08 30.94 56 Citizens Telecommunications Cos. (CTC5) 40.37 4.90 0.86 (11.23) 53 Frontier Telephone of Rochester 18.21 11.32 55.896 10.67 11.47 12.32 18.91 16.77 18.37 54 Frontier Tier 2 Concurring Companies 51.56 59.64 11.456 38.49 33.34 38.12 38.95 43.42 45.45 55 Frontier Comms of Minnesota & Frontier Comms of Iowa 34.9 47.18 33.676 32.16 31.15 25.24 33.16 35.40 29.28 57 Hawaiian Telecom 22.41 21.8810 9.44 7 16.96 15.30 16.72 17.87 17.62 15.64 58 Iowa Telecom Service Group 25.51 19.3610 17.306 17.585 14.264 13.07 59 Iowa Telecom Systems Service Group 15.2 19.1410 20.16 23.975 20.474 18.45 60 Micronesian Telecommunications Corp. 45.48 43.52 43.5267 33.91 32.75 21.83 23.58 29.24 34.45 61 Windstream Nebraska 23.87 9 28.4010
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
- 115.26 Qwest - New Mexico NM 116,346 25,334 90,998 78.21 Windstream/Valor Telecom. of Texas - New Mexico 1 NM 15,336 11,970 3,363 21.93 Windstream/Valor Telecom. of Texas - New Mexico 2 NM 7,378 3,400 3,977 53.90 Citizens Telecom. of New York - Red Hook NY 5,094 3,455 1,639 32.18 Citizens Telecom. of New York - Upstate NY 84,143 57,086 27,057 32.16 Citizens Telecom. of New York - Western Counties NY 8,716 5,914 2,802 32.15 Verizon New York Telephone NY (515,338) (490,127) (25,239) 4.90 Citizens - Frontier Cos. - Rochester Telephone NY 98,877 86,684 12,193 12.33 Windstream North Carolina NC 47,306 26,035 21,271 44.96 Embarq - Central Telephone - North Carolina NC 23,035 12,183 10,852 47.11 Verizon South - Contel - North
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A13.pdf
- 115.26 Qwest - New Mexico NM 116,346 25,334 90,998 78.21 Windstream/Valor Telecom. of Texas - New Mexico 1 NM 15,336 11,970 3,363 21.93 Windstream/Valor Telecom. of Texas - New Mexico 2 NM 7,378 3,400 3,977 53.90 Citizens Telecom. of New York - Red Hook NY 5,094 3,455 1,639 32.18 Citizens Telecom. of New York - Upstate NY 84,143 57,086 27,057 32.16 Citizens Telecom. of New York - Western Counties NY 8,716 5,914 2,802 32.15 Verizon New York Telephone NY (515,338) (490,127) (25,239) 4.90 Citizens - Frontier Cos. - Rochester Telephone NY 98,877 86,684 12,193 12.33 Windstream North Carolina NC 47,306 26,035 21,271 44.96 Embarq - Central Telephone - North Carolina NC 23,035 12,183 10,852 47.11 Verizon South - Contel - North
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.txt
- (11.23) 54 Consolidated Communications of Fort Bend Company 15.45 55 Consolidated CommunicaTIONS OF Texas Company 25.09 56 Frontier Telephone of Rochester 51.98 10.84 18.21 11.32 55.896 10.67 11.47 12.32 18.91 57 Frontier Tier 2 Concurring Companies 35.45 48.89 51.56 59.64 11.456 38.49 33.34 38.12 38.95 58 Frontier Comms of Minnesota & Frontier Comms of Iowa 16.31 33.41 34.90 47.18 33.676 32.16 31.15 25.24 33.16 59 Hawaiian Telecom 23.43 21.43 22.41 21.8810 9.447 16.96 15.30 16.72 17.87 60 Illinois Consolidated Telephone Company 38.89 61 Iowa Telecom Service Group 35.15 28.05 25.51 19.3610 17.306 17.585 14.264 13.07 62 Iowa Telecom Systems Service Group 17.19 15.20 19.1410 20.16 23.975 20.474 18.45 63 Micronesian Telecommunications Corp. 51.51 51.05 45.48 43.52 43.526733.91 32.75 21.83 23.58 Windstream
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-364A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-364A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-364A1.txt
- this would bring the regulatory books closer to the financial books. USTA proposes that we eliminate detailed requirements for property record additions, retirements, and recordkeeping. USTA contends that detailed property records do not impact the establishment of access rates and only serve to require LECs to maintain an extraordinary array of records. USTA also proposes that we eliminate the section 32.16 requirement for notification and approval to implement new accounting standards prescribed by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). USTA claims that the FASB provides a process through which proposed changes in GAAP are exposed for debate, discussion, and evaluation. Finally, USTA proposes that the Commission clarify that section 252(e) agreements are treated the same as tariffed services in Part 64
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-448A5.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-448A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-448A5.txt
- with new state or federal regulations as the Commission shall permit by rule or order, which, subject to further order of the Commission, include but are not limited to regulations concerning number portability, the Communications Assistance in Law Enforcement Act, the completion of the amortization of depreciation reserve deficiencies, changes in the Uniform System of Accounts requirements made pursuant to §32.16, changes in the Separations Manual, state and federal tax law changes, and changes in rules governing affiliate transactions and cost allocation; and (3) adjust such support to reflect changes in Lifeline support per §54.403. (b) Within each study area, a Path A LEC or Path B LEC may define up to three zones per wire center and allocate to each
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-305A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-305A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-305A1.txt
- uses fifty percent of its fiber facilities and eighty percent of its copper facilities to provide regulated services currently reports the allocation associated with each type of plant. Under USTA's proposal, however, carriers' would merely report an aggregate allocation amount for all outside plant in a single account, which would cause distortions in the model's outside plant cost estimates. Section 32.16 requirement for implementing new accounting standards In the Notice, the Commission sought comment on USTA's proposal to eliminate the section 32.16 requirement for notification and approval to implement new accounting standards prescribed by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). Section 32.16 of the Commission's rules requires carriers to revise their records and accounts to reflect new accounting standards prescribed by
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-149A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-149A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-149A1.txt
- amended, unless otherwise noted. Table of Contents, Part 32-Uniform System of Accounts for Telecommunications Companies is revised to read as follows: PART 32-UNIFORM SYSTEM OF ACCOUNTS FOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANIES Subpart A-Preface Sec. 32.1 Background. 32.2 Basis of the accounts. 32.3 Authority. 32.4 Communications Act. Subpart B-General Instructions 32.11 Classification of companies. 32.12 Records. 32.13 Accounts-general. 32.14 Regulated accounts. 32.15 [Reserved] 32.16 Changes in accounting standards. 32.17 Interpretation of accounts. 32.18 Waivers. 32.19 Address for reports and correspondence. 32.20 Numbering convention. 32.21 Sequence of accounts. 32.22 Comprehensive interperiod tax allocation. 32.23 Nonregulated activities. 32.24 Compensated absences. 32.25 Unusual items and contingent liabilities. 32.26 Materiality. 32.27 Transactions with affiliates. Subpart C-Instructions for Balance Sheet Accounts 32.101 Structure of the balance sheet accounts. 32.102
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-74A1.txt
- their price caps automatically to reflect [GAAP] changes.'' A GAAP change did not qualify for exogenous treatment unless it first had been ``actually approved'' by the Financial Accounting Standards Board. In other words, the rules precluded exogenous treatment of costs arising from the anticipation that the FASB would approve a GAAP change. Once the FASB prescribed a GAAP change, section 32.16(a) of the Commission's rules required the carriers' ``records and accounts [to] be adjusted to apply [the] new accounting standard[].'' That change would ``automatically take effect'' 90 days after the carrier notified the agency that it proposed to implement the change, ``unless the Commission notifie[d] the carrier to the contrary.'' The Commission's practice was to permit FASB-approved GAAP changes to go
- http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.txt
- that the Commission shall permit or require by rule, rule waiver, or declaratory ruling. Subject to further order of the Commission, those exogenous changes shall include cost changes caused by: The completion of the amortization of depreciation reserve deficiencies; Such changes in the Uniform System of Accounts, including changes in the Uniform System of Accounts requirements made pursuant to § 32.16 of this chapter, as the Commission shall permit or require be treated as exogenous by rule, rule waiver, or declaratory ruling; Changes in the Separations Manual; [Reserved]; The reallocation of investment from regulated to nonregulated activities pursuant to § 64.901 of this chapter; Such tax law changes and other extraordinary cost changes as the Commission shall permit or require be
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99235.doc
- targeted to the Average Traffic Sensitive Charge (as defined in paragraph 61.45(i)(3) of this chapter). er of the Commission, those exogenous changes shall include cost changes caused by: (i) the completion of the amortization of depreciation reserve deficiencies; (ii) such changes in the Uniform System of Accounts, including changes in the Uniform System of Accounts requirements made pursuant to § 32.16 of this chapter, as the Commission shall permit or require be treated as exogenous by rule, rule waiver, or declaratory ruling. (iii) changes in the Separations Manual; (iv) changes to the level of obligation associated with the Long Term Support Fund and the Transitional Support Fund described in § 69.612; (v) the reallocation of investment from regulated to nonregulated activities
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2000/fcc00364.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2000/fcc00364.txt
- this would bring the regulatory books closer to the financial books. USTA proposes that we eliminate detailed requirements for property record additions, retirements, and recordkeeping. USTA contends that detailed property records do not impact the establishment of access rates and only serve to require LECs to maintain an extraordinary array of records. USTA also proposes that we eliminate the section 32.16 requirement for notification and approval to implement new accounting standards prescribed by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). USTA claims that the FASB provides a process through which proposed changes in GAAP are exposed for debate, discussion, and evaluation. Finally, USTA proposes that the Commission clarify that section 252(e) agreements are treated the same as tariffed services in Part 64
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00193.txt
- that the Commission shall permit or require by rule, rule waiver, or declaratory ruling. Subject to further order of the Commission, those exogenous changes shall include cost changes caused by: The completion of the amortization of depreciation reserve deficiencies; Such changes in the Uniform System of Accounts, including changes in the Uniform System of Accounts requirements made pursuant to § 32.16 of this chapter, as the Commission shall permit or require be treated as exogenous by rule, rule waiver, or declaratory ruling; Changes in the Separations Manual; [Reserved]; The reallocation of investment from regulated to nonregulated activities pursuant to § 64.901 of this chapter; Such tax law changes and other extraordinary cost changes as the Commission shall permit or require be
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
- 47.76 46.12 45.40 41.53 42.4343.82 Louisiana New Orleans 55.31 55.70 55.22 55.71 50.21 50.21 46.30 46.34 45.64 41.30 42.2242.93 Maine Portland 40.13 40.52 40.52 40.52 40.54 38.63 38.82 39.75 41.33 43.06 43.7844.68 Maryland Baltimore 42.64 43.10 44.97 43.57 43.57 43.57 43.57 43.60 43.16 43.12 44.1443.80 Massachusetts Boston 36.90 43.41 54.10 49.77 43.22 42.78 42.78 42.78 42.78 42.78 42.9940.02 Massachusetts Hyannis 32.16 32.16 43.42 46.92 46.92 46.92 46.92 48.38 48.38 48.38 47.7248.42 Massachusetts Springfield 35.29 37.28 38.89 49.77 43.22 38.89 38.89 38.89 38.89 38.89 39.3140.02 Michigan Detroit 36.17 34.50 36.31 36.35 37.02 37.81 40.89 40.89 38.32 40.68 43.2845.54 Michigan Grand Rapids 34.48 34.49 34.63 34.62 35.29 36.02 35.81 35.88 36.66 37.57 39.9741.52 Michigan Saginaw 34.29 34.29 34.43 34.45 35.11 36.59 37.95 39.14
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
- 55.31 55.70 55.22 55.71 50.21 50.21 46.30 46.34 45.64 41.30 42.22 43.28 44.41 Maine Portland 40.13 40.52 40.52 40.52 40.54 38.63 38.82 39.75 41.33 43.06 43.78 46.78 48.16 Maryland Baltimore 42.64 43.10 44.97 43.57 43.57 43.57 43.57 43.60 43.16 43.12 44.14 44.18 45.05 Massachusetts Boston 36.90 43.41 54.10 49.77 43.22 42.78 42.78 42.78 42.78 42.78 42.99 40.39 42.88 Massachusetts Hyannis 32.16 32.16 43.42 46.92 46.92 46.92 46.92 48.38 48.38 48.38 47.72 48.79 49.97 Massachusetts Springfield 35.29 37.28 38.89 49.77 43.22 38.89 38.89 38.89 38.89 38.89 39.31 40.39 42.88 Michigan Detroit 36.17 34.50 36.31 36.35 37.02 37.81 40.89 40.89 38.32 40.68 43.28 44.22 44.69 Michigan Grand Rapids 34.48 34.49 34.63 34.62 35.29 36.02 35.81 35.88 36.66 37.57 39.97 41.83 42.37 Michigan Saginaw
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref97.pdf
- 36.36 35.44 35.44 35.44 MA Boston 33.52 33.52 34.52 33.72 33.22 33.22 34.12 34.12 40.14 50.02 46.02 39.96 39.56 Hyannis 29.00 29.00 30.00 29.20 28.84 28.84 29.74 29.74 29.74 40.15 43.38 43.38 43.38 Springfield 31.98 31.98 32.98 32.18 31.73 31.73 32.63 32.63 34.47 35.96 35.96 35.96 35.96 MI Detroit 28.40 29.52 30.52 31.74 32.34 32.34 32.25 32.01 32.01 32.14 32.14 32.16 32.41 Grand Rapids 28.40 29.52 30.52 31.74 32.34 32.34 32.25 32.01 32.01 32.14 32.14 32.16 32.41 Saginaw 28.40 29.52 30.52 31.74 32.34 32.34 32.25 32.01 32.01 32.14 32.14 32.16 32.41 MN Detroit Lakes 30.38 35.54 38.58 39.58 39.67 37.80 38.70 38.23 38.23 38.23 38.23 38.23 38.23 Minneapolis 40.96 47.95 48.74 49.75 49.69 47.28 48.18 48.18 48.18 48.18 49.45 49.45 49.45
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
- 60.96 60.96 60.96 61.01 55.87 56.84 Louisiana New Orleans 55.31 55.70 55.22 55.71 50.21 50.21 46.30 46.12 Louisiana Baton Rouge 52.31 51.44 51.44 51.65 48.55 49.50 47.76 46.34 Maine Portland 40.13 40.52 40.52 40.52 40.54 38.63 38.82 39.75 Maryland Baltimore 42.64 43.10 44.97 43.57 43.57 43.57 43.57 43.60 Massachusetts Boston 36.90 43.41 54.10 49.77 43.22 42.78 42.78 42.78 Massachusetts Hyannis 32.16 32.16 43.42 46.92 46.92 46.92 46.92 48.38 Massachusetts Springfield 35.29 37.28 38.89 49.77 43.22 38.89 38.89 38.89 Michigan Detroit 36.17 34.50 36.31 36.35 37.02 37.81 40.89 40.89 Michigan Grand Rapids 34.48 34.49 34.63 34.62 35.29 36.02 35.81 35.81 Michigan Saginaw 34.29 34.29 34.43 34.45 35.11 36.59 37.95 37.95 Minnesota Detroit Lakes 42.14 42.34 42.34 42.37 42.35 42.41 42.41 42.28 Minnesota
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
- 55.27 Louisiana New Orleans 55.31 55.70 55.22 55.71 50.21 50.21 46.30 46.34 45.64 Louisiana Baton Rouge 52.31 51.44 51.44 51.65 48.55 49.50 47.76 46.12 45.40 Maine Portland 40.13 40.52 40.52 40.52 40.54 38.63 38.82 39.75 41.33 Maryland Baltimore 42.64 43.10 44.97 43.57 43.57 43.57 43.57 43.60 44.97 Massachusetts Boston 36.90 43.41 54.10 49.77 43.22 42.78 42.78 42.78 44.10 Massachusetts Hyannis 32.16 32.16 43.42 46.92 46.92 46.92 46.92 48.38 48.38 Massachusetts Springfield 35.29 37.28 38.89 49.77 43.22 38.89 38.89 38.89 38.89 Michigan Detroit 36.17 34.50 36.31 36.35 37.02 37.81 40.89 40.89 38.31 Michigan Grand Rapids 34.48 34.49 34.63 34.62 35.29 36.02 35.81 35.88 34.63 Michigan Saginaw 34.29 34.29 34.43 34.45 35.11 36.59 37.95 39.14 38.43 Minnesota Detroit Lakes 42.14 42.34 42.34 42.37
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror03.pdf
- 56 Citizens Telecommunications Cos. (CTC3) 10.40 8.94 4.52 16.12 15.56 57 Citizens Telecommunications Cos. (CTC4) 35.38 23.31 13.08 30.94 58 Citizens Telecommunications Cos. (CTC5) 40.37 4.90 0.86 (11.23) 59 Frontier Telephone of Rochester 10.67 11.47 12.32 18.91 16.77 18.37 13.19 60 Frontier Tier 2 Concurring Companies 38.49 33.34 38.12 38.95 43.42 45.45 31.93 61 Frontier Communications of Minnesota & Iowa 32.16 31.15 25.24 33.16 35.40 29.28 28.26 62 Iowa Telecom Service Group 17.58 14.264 13.07 63 Iowa Telecom Systems Service Group 23.97 20.474 18.45 64 Valor New Mexico #1164 18.45 16.86 11.45 20.67 65 Valor New Mexico #1193 20.41 15.88 8.39 13.35 66 Valor Oklahoma 8.69 9.31 11.65 11.22 67 Valor Texas 15.21 10.66 5.70 5.24 Maximum Rate of Return 59.89%
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
- TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.17 11.17 14.46 14.08 313.06 6.88 11.16 34SHAWNEE TELEPHONE COMPANY 20.27 11.17 137.76 18.50 36.65 22.49 35STANDARD TELEPHONE CO. 10.70 10.82 10.08 10.40 10.42 10.40 36TELEPHONE UTILITIES EXCHANGE CARRIER ASSOC. 11.31 11.25 9.91 13.53 9.55 11.54 37UTELCO, INC. 10.72 38VIRGIN ISLANDS TELEPHONE CORPORATION 10.55 11.17 18.84 (1.56) 51.72 11.24 6.96 39WABASH TELEPHONE COMPANY 24.08 11.17 31.69 17.27 59.61 32.16 40WARWICK VALLEY TELEPHONE COMPANY 12.25 11.04 24.14 12.37 1,000.00 11.91 12.49 41WEST RIVER MUTUAL AID TELEPHONE CORP. 11.57 10.96 23.19 12.75 8.28 11.02 42WOODHULL TELEPHONE COMPANY 14.57 11.17 (20.24) 13.52 46.18 15.96 1/ Company sold. Cumulative period reported is 1/1/95 - 9/30/95. 2/ Cincinnati now files as an Optional Incentive Regulation Company so only files Interstate information. MAXIMUM RATE OF
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
- 56 Citizens Telecommunications Cos. (CTC3) 10.40 8.94 4.52 16.12 15.56 57 Citizens Telecommunications Cos. (CTC4) 35.38 23.31 13.08 30.94 58 Citizens Telecommunications Cos. (CTC5) 40.37 4.90 0.86 (11.23) 59 Frontier Telephone of Rochester 10.67 11.47 12.32 18.91 16.77 18.37 13.19 60 Frontier Tier 2 Concurring Companies 38.49 33.34 38.12 38.95 43.42 45.45 31.93 61 Frontier Communications of Minnesota & Iowa 32.16 31.15 25.24 33.16 35.40 29.28 28.26 62 Iowa Telecom Service Group 17.58 14.264 13.07 63 Iowa Telecom Systems Service Group 23.97 20.474 18.45 64 Valor New Mexico #1164 18.45 16.86 11.45 20.67 65 Valor New Mexico #1193 20.41 15.88 8.39 13.35 66 Valor Oklahoma 8.69 9.31 11.65 11.22 67 Valor Texas 15.21 10.66 5.70 5.24 Maximum Rate of Return 59.89%54.09%
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
- 56 Citizens Telecommunications Cos. (CTC3) 10.40 8.94 4.52 16.12 15.56 57 Citizens Telecommunications Cos. (CTC4) 35.38 23.31 13.08 30.94 58 Citizens Telecommunications Cos. (CTC5) 40.37 4.90 0.86 (11.23) 59 Frontier Telephone of Rochester 10.67 11.47 12.32 18.91 16.77 18.37 13.19 60 Frontier Tier 2 Concurring Companies 38.49 33.34 38.12 38.95 43.42 45.45 31.93 61 Frontier Communications of Minnesota & Iowa 32.16 31.15 25.24 33.16 35.40 29.28 28.26 62 Iowa Telecom Service Group 17.58 14.264 13.07 63 Iowa Telecom Systems Service Group 23.97 20.474 18.45 64 Valor New Mexico #1164 18.45 16.86 11.45 20.67 65 Valor New Mexico #1193 20.41 15.88 8.39 13.35 66 Valor Oklahoma 8.69 9.31 11.65 11.22 67 Valor Texas 15.21 10.66 5.70 5.24 Maximum Rate of Return 59.89%54.09%
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-11.pdf
- NA NA NA NA SBC - Southwestern Bell - Kansas KS 821,798 554,237 267,561 32.56 BellSouth - Kentucky KY 129,603 106,775 22,828 17.61 Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company - Kentucky KY 870,052 634,371 235,681 27.09 BellSouth - Louisiana LA 1,629,449 1,217,172 412,277 25.30 Verizon - New England - Maine ME 471,944 329,389 142,556 30.21 Verizon - Maryland MD 2,168,418 1,471,100 697,317 32.16 Verizon - New England - Massachusetts MA 2,487,131 1,606,500 880,631 35.41 Verizon - Contel South - Michigan MI 27,866 20,828 7,037 25.25 Verizon - North - Michigan MI 411,584 304,153 107,432 26.10 SBC - Ameritech - Michigan MI 2,933,026 2,202,460 730,564 24.91 Qwest - Minnesota MN NA NA NA NA BellSouth - Mississippi MS 1,116,095 868,056 248,038 22.22 SBC -
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-11.pdf
- 594,696 390,840 203,856 34.28 SBC - Southwestern Bell - Kansas KS 821,799 551,902 269,897 32.84 Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company - Kentucky KY 129,603 106,775 22,828 17.61 BellSouth - Kentucky KY 870,052 634,363 235,689 27.09 BellSouth - Louisiana LA 1,629,449 1,217,163 412,286 25.30 Verizon - New England - Maine ME 471,944 329,389 142,556 30.21 Verizon - Maryland MD 2,168,418 1,471,100 697,317 32.16 Verizon - New England - Massachusetts MA 2,487,131 1,606,500 880,631 35.41 Verizon - Contel South - Michigan MI 27,866 20,828 7,037 25.25 Verizon - North - Michigan MI 411,584 304,153 107,432 26.10 SBC - Ameritech - Michigan MI 2,933,026 2,202,461 730,565 24.91 Qwest - Minnesota MN 1,250,002 829,694 420,307 33.62 BellSouth - Mississippi MS 1,116,095 868,036 248,059 22.23 SBC -
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
- Telecom - Upstate NY 268,397 205,547 62,848 23.42 24.59 Citizens Telecom - W. Counties NY 26,788 19,590 7,330 27.36 33.10 Frontier of Rochester NY 469,327 364,489 107,878 22.99 29.91 ALLTEL - Carolina NC 190,846 142,493 49,138 25.75 11.54 BellSouth - North Carolina NC 2,168,141 1,593,701 592,905 27.35 23.38 Verizon - South - Contel - North Carolina NC 111,544 78,668 35,874 32.16 20.70 Verizon - South - North Carolina NC 237,558 169,730 78,274 32.95 28.62 Sprint - Carolina Tel. & Tel. of North Carolina NC 629,448 491,308 173,255 27.52 36.05 Sprint - Centel of North Carolina NC 208,490 164,921 43,111 20.68 31.44 Qwest - North Dakota ND 140,410 90,346 53,124 37.83 36.50 SBC - Ameritech - Ohio Bell OH 1,707,737 1,106,763 680,739