FCC Web Documents citing 32.17

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-553A1.pdf
  • such equipment.3Aztek requests that we further clarify the definition of a "remote terminal for a concentrator" to exclude Emergency Stand- Alone (ESA) routers, which it claims allow a remote terminal to switch calls between lines served by the terminal and pre-designated emergency response numbers in the event that a feeder line is cut or otherwise out of service.4Pursuant to section 32.17 of the Commission's rules, the definition of "remote terminal for a concentrator" is clarified as described below. 5 Specifically, Aztek requests a clarification that "the installation of emergency standalone routing capability in a device that is and has been a remote terminal or concentrator will not, in and of itself, 1Letter from John T. Nakahata, Counsel for Aztek Networks, Harris
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1395A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1395A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1395A1.txt
  • 52 minutes 56.9 seconds west. In New Jersey, the cable landing station will be located in an eleven acre site in Wall Township, Manasquan, New Jersey, at coordinates 40º 9 minutes 30.4 seconds north and 74º 6 minutes 5.8 seconds west. The Apollo Cable will land in Creathorne Farm, Bude, United Kingdom, at coordinates 50º 47.47 minutes north and 4º 32.17 minutes west. In France, the Apollo Cable will land in Keradrivin, Ville de Lannion, at coordinates 48º 45 minutes 4 seconds north and 3º 30 minutes 25 seconds west. C&W USA has complied with Section 1.767(a) of the Commission's rules, which requires applicants to file a specific description of any landing point, including a map. The license therefore is not
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1615A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1615A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1615A1.txt
  • 53 minutes 4 seconds west. In New Jersey, the cable landing station will be located in an eleven acre site in Wall Township, Manasquan, New Jersey, at coordinates 40º 9 minutes 30.4 seconds north and 74º 6 minutes 5.8 seconds west. The Apollo Cable will land in Creathorne Farm, Bude, United Kingdom, at coordinates 50º 47.47 minutes north and 4º 32.17 minutes west. In France, the Apollo Cable will land in Keradrivin, Ville de Lannion, at coordinates 48º 45 minutes 4 seconds north and 3º 30 minutes 25 seconds west. C&W USA has complied with Section 1.767(a) of the Commission's rules, which requires applicants to file a specific description of any landing point, including a map.46 The license therefore is not
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-488A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-488A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-488A1.txt
  • suspended the tariffs for one day and imposed accounting orders in the event the carriers' proposed rates were later found to be unreasonable. On March 7, 1996, the Commission rescinded the portion of RAO 20 that addressed the rate base treatment of OPEB related costs. The Commission found that RAO 20 exceeded the Bureau's delegated authority under 47 C.F.R. § 32.17 to the extent that it directed exclusions from, and additions to, a LEC's interstate rate base that are not specifically authorized by Part 65 of the Commission's rules. The Commission specifically emphasized that its decision to order such rescission was based on procedural grounds and not on the substantive merits of the ratemaking practices at issue. In response to the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-553A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-553A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-553A1.txt
  • equipment. Aztek requests that we further clarify the definition of a ``remote terminal for a concentrator'' to exclude Emergency Stand-Alone (ESA) routers, which it claims allow a remote terminal to switch calls between lines served by the terminal and pre-designated emergency response numbers in the event that a feeder line is cut or otherwise out of service. Pursuant to section 32.17 of the Commission's rules, the definition of ``remote terminal for a concentrator'' is clarified as described below. Specifically, Aztek requests a clarification that ``the installation of emergency standalone routing capability in a device that is and has been a remote terminal or concentrator will not, in and of itself, require that a remote terminal or concentrator to be reclassified as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 0.00 300633 A MIDDLE POINT HOME TEL. CO. -1.33 -7.05 6.16 6.19 300634 A MINFORD TEL. CO., INC. 29.23 -1.44 31.12 0.00 300639 A THE NEW KNOXVILLE TEL. CO. 10.63 -0.24 10.89 63.67 300644 C THE NOVA TEL. CO. 13.29 1.44 11.68 28.80 300645 A OAKWOOD TEL. CO. 10.78 -0.31 11.13 67.68 300649 C ORWELL TEL. CO. -4.47 -1.61 -2.91 -32.17 300650 A THE OTTOVILLE MUTUAL TEL. CO. -1.12 -6.36 5.60 3.93 300651 A PATTERSONVILLE TEL. CO.-OH 6.58 -1.89 8.63 19.78 300654 A RIDGEVILLE TEL. CO. -0.77 -6.67 6.33 7.64 300656 A SHERWOOD MUTUAL TEL. ASSOC. 13.33 0.87 12.35 98.81 300658 C SYCAMORE TEL. CO. -7.03 -1.70 -5.42 -100.00 300659 A TELEPHONE SERVICE CO. 15.26 -2.77 18.54 0.00 300661 C UNITED
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • 0.00 300633 A MIDDLE POINT HOME TEL. CO. -1.33 -7.05 6.16 6.19 300634 A MINFORD TEL. CO., INC. 29.23 -1.44 31.12 0.00 300639 A THE NEW KNOXVILLE TEL. CO. 10.63 -0.24 10.89 63.67 300644 C THE NOVA TEL. CO. 13.29 1.44 11.68 28.80 300645 A OAKWOOD TEL. CO. 10.78 -0.31 11.13 67.68 300649 C ORWELL TEL. CO. -4.47 -1.61 -2.91 -32.17 300650 A THE OTTOVILLE MUTUAL TEL. CO. -1.12 -6.36 5.60 3.93 300651 A PATTERSONVILLE TEL. CO.-OH 6.58 -1.89 8.63 19.78 300654 A RIDGEVILLE TEL. CO. -0.77 -6.67 6.33 7.64 300656 A SHERWOOD MUTUAL TEL. ASSOC. 13.33 0.87 12.35 98.81 300658 C SYCAMORE TEL. CO. -7.03 -1.70 -5.42 -100.00 300659 A TELEPHONE SERVICE CO. 15.26 -2.77 18.54 0.00 300661 C UNITED
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • - West Coast California CA 7,194 5,204 1,990 27.66 Verizon California - GTE - California CA 1,576,524 1,189,397 388,937 24.67 AT&T - Pacific Telesis - Pacific Bell - California CA 6,052,472 4,458,791 1,595,030 26.35 Qwest - Colorado CO 1,088,561 782,887 305,723 28.09 AT&T - Southern New England Telephone CT 1,020,708 739,622 287,464 28.16 Verizon Delaware, LLC DE 277,019 187,916 89,126 32.17 Verizon Washington, D.C. DC 403,257 242,927 160,339 39.76 Verizon Florida, LLC FL 1,185,119 850,268 334,965 28.26 AT&T - BellSouth - Florida FL 2,577,508 1,827,310 753,380 29.23 Embarq - Florida FL 865,211 646,605 218,606 25.27 Windstream Georgia Communications GA 145,957 103,540 42,429 29.07 AT&T - BellSouth - Georgia GA 1,934,849 1,341,645 595,439 30.77 Hawaiian Telcom Communications, Inc. HI 373,685 278,825 94,860
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A13.pdf
  • - West Coast California CA 7,194 5,204 1,990 27.66 Verizon California - GTE - California CA 1,576,524 1,189,397 388,937 24.67 AT&T - Pacific Telesis - Pacific Bell - California CA 6,052,472 4,458,791 1,595,030 26.35 Qwest - Colorado CO 1,088,561 782,887 305,723 28.09 AT&T - Southern New England Telephone CT 1,020,708 739,622 287,464 28.16 Verizon Delaware, LLC DE 277,019 187,916 89,126 32.17 Verizon Washington, D.C. DC 403,257 242,927 160,339 39.76 Verizon Florida, LLC FL 1,185,119 850,268 334,965 28.26 AT&T - BellSouth - Florida FL 2,577,508 1,827,310 753,380 29.23 Embarq - Florida FL 865,211 646,605 218,606 25.27 Windstream Georgia Communications GA 145,957 103,540 42,429 29.07 AT&T - BellSouth - Georgia GA 1,934,849 1,341,645 595,439 30.77 Hawaiian Telcom Communications, Inc. HI 373,685 278,825 94,860
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-305A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-305A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-305A1.txt
  • of Contents, Part 32-Uniform System of Accounts for Telecommunications Companies is revised to read as follows: PART 32-UNIFORM SYSTEM OF ACCOUNTS FOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANIES Subpart A-Preface Sec. 32.1 Background. 32.2 Basis of the accounts. 32.3 Authority 32.4 Communications Act. Subpart B-General Instructions 32.11 Classification of companies. 32.12 Records. 32.13 Accounts-general. 32.14 Regulated accounts. 32.15 [Reserved] 32.16 Changes in accounting standards. 32.17 Interpretation of accounts. 32.18 Waivers. 32.19 Address for reports and correspondence. 32.20 Numbering convention. 32.21 Sequence of accounts. 32.22 Comprehensive interperiod tax allocation. 32.23 Nonregulated activities. 32.24 Compensated absences. 32.25 Unusual items and contingent liabilities. 32.26 Materiality. 32.27 Transactions with affiliates. Subpart C-Instructions for Balance Sheet Accounts 32.101 Structure of the balance sheet accounts. Nonregulated investments. 32.103 Balance sheet accounts
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.txt
  • copying at the Reference Information Center, Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554. * * * * * PART 32 - UNIFORM SYSTEMS OF ACCOUNTS FOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANIES 68. The authority citation for Part 32 continues to read: Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154(I), 154(j) and 220 as amended, unless otherwise noted. 69. Section 32.17 is revised to read as follows: § 32.17 Interpretation of accounts. To the end that uniform accounting shall be maintained within the prescribed system, questions involving significant matters which are not clearly provided for shall be submitted to the Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau, for explanation, interpretation, or resolution. Questions and answers thereto with respect to this system of accounts will
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-149A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-149A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-149A1.txt
  • of Contents, Part 32-Uniform System of Accounts for Telecommunications Companies is revised to read as follows: PART 32-UNIFORM SYSTEM OF ACCOUNTS FOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANIES Subpart A-Preface Sec. 32.1 Background. 32.2 Basis of the accounts. 32.3 Authority. 32.4 Communications Act. Subpart B-General Instructions 32.11 Classification of companies. 32.12 Records. 32.13 Accounts-general. 32.14 Regulated accounts. 32.15 [Reserved] 32.16 Changes in accounting standards. 32.17 Interpretation of accounts. 32.18 Waivers. 32.19 Address for reports and correspondence. 32.20 Numbering convention. 32.21 Sequence of accounts. 32.22 Comprehensive interperiod tax allocation. 32.23 Nonregulated activities. 32.24 Compensated absences. 32.25 Unusual items and contingent liabilities. 32.26 Materiality. 32.27 Transactions with affiliates. Subpart C-Instructions for Balance Sheet Accounts 32.101 Structure of the balance sheet accounts. 32.102 Nonregulated investments. 32.103 Balance sheet
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-74A1.txt
  • their contention that deduction of OPEB costs from their rate bases was not appropriate prior to 1997. In that order, the Commission stated, Sections 65.820 and 65.830 of our rules define explicitly those items to be included in, or excluded from, the interstate rate base. The Bureau cannot properly address any additional exclusion in an RAO letter, which under Section 32.17 of our rules must be limited to explanation, interpretation, and resolution of accounting matters. Verizon argues that the Commission found in the RAO 20 Rescission Order that the previous deductions that the carriers had made pursuant to RAO Letter 20 were contrary to the Commission's rules. Consequently, according to Verizon, ``the price cap carriers had an obligation to conform their
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • Woodbury Telephone of Connecticut, affiliated with SBC, 25,364 average schedule company loops. Also excludes Puerto Rico Telephone Company, affiliated with Verizon, 1,289,665 rate of return lines. Source: NECA, Universal Service Fund 2003 Submission of 2002 Study Results (October 1, 2003). 7 - 4 Table 7.3 (As of December 31, 2002) Holding Companies Loops Percent of Loops Verizon Communications, Inc. 57,948,446 32.17 % SBC Communications, Inc. 57,010,081 31.65 BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc 23,688,786 13.15 Qwest Communications International, Inc 16,247,566 9.02 Sprint Corporation 7,853,621 4.36 ALLTEL Corporation 2,912,182 1.62 CenturyTel, Inc. 2,387,446 1.33 Citizens Communications Company 2,293,462 1.27 Broadwing, Inc. 968,706 0.54 TDS Telecommunications Corporation 691,304 0.38 Valor Telecommunications, LLC 563,831 0.31 C-TEC Corporation 338,132 0.19 Alaska Communications System 316,037 0.18 Iowa Network Service,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • Changes from 2000 to 2001 by Study Area Unseparated High Cost Study Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Loop Support Area NTS Revenue of Requirement Payments in Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* TOTAL: COLORADO 1.06 -1.88 2.99 7.93 461835 C SUNFLOWER TELEPHONE CO.,INC. - CO 46.05 1.12 44.43 69.52 462178 C AGATE TELEPHONE CO. 42.41 7.75 32.17 58.34 462181 C BIJOU TEL COOPERATIVE ASSOC. INC 39.09 2.86 35.22 77.81 462182 C BLANCA TELEPHONE CO. 4.66 5.88 -1.16 0.39 462184 C DELTA COUNTY TELE-COMM INC. 4.15 3.07 1.05 -3.04 462185 C CENTURYTEL OF EAGLE, INC. 2.83 2.14 0.68 -0.60 462186 C EASTERN SLOPE RURAL TEL ASSN INC 31.09 2.84 27.46 104.02 462187 C EL PASO COUNTY MUTUAL TEL
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-11.pdf
  • 1,360,912 1,070,845 290,067 21.31 SBC - Ameritech - Michigan MI 7,721,227 5,826,708 1,894,519 24.54 Qwest - Minnesota MN 3,450,256 2,424,795 1,025,463 29.72 BellSouth - Mississippi MS 2,668,467 1,961,019 707,448 26.51 SBC - Southwestern Bell - Missouri MO 4,197,281 2,836,884 1,360,397 32.41 Sprint - United Telephone Company of Missouri MO 425,924 315,480 110,444 25.93 Qwest - Montana MT 705,165 478,344 226,820 32.17 Aliant Telecommunications - Nebraska NE 451,891 332,541 119,351 26.41 Qwest - Nebraska NE 1,236,355 810,557 425,798 34.44 Sprint - Centel of Nevada NV 1,092,420 842,957 249,457 22.84 Verizon - Contel Nevada NV 70,428 43,288 27,140 38.54 SBC - Nevada Bell NV 537,420 375,185 162,235 30.19 Verizon - New England - New Hampshire NH 1,413,378 925,067 488,310 34.55 Verizon - New
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • 0.00 305150 C OHIO BELL TEL. CO. 3.85 -0.72 4.61 0.00 TOTAL: OKLAHOMA 0.21 1.20 -0.98 12.23 431165 C VALOR TELECOMMUNICATION OF OK (432080 GTE) 7.83 3.54 4.14 0.00 431704 A LAVACA TELEPHONE CO.- OK 16.09 4.13 11.49 INFINITE 431788 C KANOKLA TELEPHONE ASSN.INC. - OK 10.81 -1.10 12.05 16.43 431831 C SOUTH CENTRAL TEL. ASSN., INC.-OK 29.15 0.00 29.15 32.17 431965 C ALLTEL OKLAHOMA, INC. -2.76 2.14 -4.80 -4.48 431966 C ATLAS TELEPHONE CO. 4.43 15.81 -9.83 -5.67 431968 A BEGGS TELEPHONE COMPANY 12.14 1.44 10.55 INFINITE 431969 C BIXBY TELEPHONE CO. 7.75 6.43 1.24 20.59 431974 C CANADIAN VALLEY TELEPHONE CO. 9.25 0.00 9.25 19.98 431976 C CARNEGIE TELEPHONE CO.INC. 11.86 0.41 11.40 43.13 431977 C CENTRAL OKLAHOMA TELEPHONE