FCC Web Documents citing 52.15

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2375A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2375A1.pdf
  • ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-08-IH-5265 NAL/Acct. No. 201032080005 FRN No. 0005052808 NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE AND ORDER Adopted: November 10, 2009 Released: November 12, 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Global NAPs California, Inc. (``Global NAPs''), apparently violated sections 52.15(k)(1) and 52.15(f) of the Commission's rules, and Commission orders, by willfully and repeatedly failing to submit to a Commission numbering audit, failing to maintain accurate number use data and submitting inaccurate North American Numbering Plan Numbering Resource Utilization/Forecast (``NRUF'') reports, failing to submit its August 2009 NRUF report, and failing to respond on a timely and complete basis to a
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1268A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1268A1.pdf
  • (Commission established $20,000 as the base forfeiture amount for a carrier's failure to file accurate revenue on FCC Form 497, proposing a $320,000 forfeiture for VCI's sixteen apparent violations); Global NAPs California, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 24 FCC Rcd 13545, 13554-56 ¶¶ 24-27 (Enf. Bur. 2009) (assessing $25,000 proposed forfeiture against a carrier for apparently violating Section 52.15(f) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f), finding that filing of inaccurate reports undermines the Commission's ability to monitor and ensure the efficient allocation of telephone numbering resources) (``Global NAPs California, Inc.''); Cardinal Broadband LLC, aka Sovereign Telecommunications, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 23 FCC Rcd 12233, 12235-37 ¶¶ 6-11 (Enf. Bur. 2008) (assessing a $25,000 forfeiture against an
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2155A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2155A1.pdf
  • Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (the ``Bureau'') and PageData LLC (``PageData'') and WaveSent LLC (``WaveSent''). The Consent Decree terminates the enforcement proceedings initiated by the Bureau against PageData and WaveSent for possible violation of section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``the Act''), section 52.15(f) of the Commission's rules and Commission orders. The Bureau and PageData and WaveSent have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find that the public interest would be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1000A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1000A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1000A1.txt
  • 20554 In the Matter of LITELCO COMMUNICATIONS, INC. OCN# 6873 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017 NAL/Acct. No. Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Litelco Communications, Inc. (``Litelco'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that Litelco is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the North
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1001A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1001A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1001A1.txt
  • D.C. 20554 In the Matter of NECLEC, LLC OCN# 4580 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017j NAL/Acct. No. 200132080041 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Neclec, LLC (``Neclec'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that Neclec is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the North
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1002A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1002A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1002A1.txt
  • CORPORATION OCN #s: 2640, 2839, 3258, 2539, 3490, 2659, 2641 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017k NAL/Acct. No. 200132080042 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Net-Tel Corporation (``Net-Tel'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that Net-Tel is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the North
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1003A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1003A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1003A1.txt
  • INC. OCN#s: 2580, 2579, 4177, 4179, 4178, 4176 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017l NAL /Acct. No. 200132080043 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Network Plus, Inc. (``NPI'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that NPI is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the North
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1004A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1004A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1004A1.txt
  • of NORTH AMERICAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION OCN # 8770 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017m NAL/Acct. No. 200132080044 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that North American Telecommunications Corporation (``NATC'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that NATC is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the North
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1005A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1005A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1005A1.txt
  • COUNTY COMMUNICATIONS CORP. OCN#s: 7894, 8293, 8294 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017n NAL/Acct. No. 2001320080045 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that North County Communications Corp. (``North County'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that North County is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the North
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1006A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1006A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1006A1.txt
  • TEXAS TELECOM, INC. OCN#s: 4743, 4744, 4797, 7758 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017o NAL/Acct. No. 200132080046 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Optel Texas Telecom, Inc. (``Optel'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that Optel is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $9,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the North
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1007A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1007A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1007A1.txt
  • SOURCE USA, LLC OCN#s: 4781, 4998, 4999 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017p NAL/Acct. No. 200132080047 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Paging Source USA, LLC (``Paging Source'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that Paging Source is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1008A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1008A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1008A1.txt
  • DISTRIBUTORS, INC. OCN# 6841 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017q NAL/Acct. No. 200132080048 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that R and G Distributors, Inc. (``R and G Distributors'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that R and G Distributors is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1009A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1009A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1009A1.txt
  • INC. OCN#s: 2507, 2621, 2508, 2510, 2620, 2506, 3799 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017r NAL/Acct. No. 200132080049 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Trivergent Communications, Inc. (``Trivergent'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that Trivergent is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the North
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1010A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1010A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1010A1.txt
  • MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS, INC. II OCN# 6543 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017s NAL/Acct. No. 200132080050 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that USA Mobile Communications, Inc. II (``USA Mobile'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that USA Mobile is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $12,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1011A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1011A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1011A1.txt
  • of VANGUARD CELLULAR SYSTEMS, INC. OCN#s: 6383, 6384 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017t NAL/Acct. No. 200132080051 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Vanguard Cellular Systems, Inc. (``Vanguard'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that Vanguard is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $9,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the North
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1012A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1012A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1012A1.txt
  • In the Matter of WINSOME PAGING, INC. OCN# 6918 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017u NAL/Acct. No. 200132080052 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Winsome Paging, Inc. (``Winsome'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that Winsome is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the North
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1409A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1409A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1409A1.txt
  • Order mandated that ``all carriers that receive numbering resources from the NANPA (i.e., code holders), or that receive numbering resources from a Pooling Administrator in thousands blocks (i.e., block holders), report forecast and utilization data to the NANPA.'' Clearly 500 and 900 NPA's are covered by this mandate. The Bureau has instructed the NANPA, in accordance with 47 C.F.R. § 52.15 (g)(3)(4), to withhold numbering resources from carriers that fail to comply with these reporting requirements. Carriers are encouraged to report numbering resources in the 500 and 900 NPAs separately from those in the geographic NPAs. The NANPA will provide further guidance to . of the Common Carrier Bureau, Network Services Division; TTY Number: (202) 418-0484. Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1815A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1815A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1815A1.txt
  • described. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey J. Carlisle Senior Deputy Chief Common Carrier Bureau Numbering Resource Optimization, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 15 FCC Rcd 7574, CC Docket No. 99-200 (2000) (NRO Order). Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 251(e)(1), the Commission has plenary jurisdiction over the NANP as it pertains to the United States. 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6). By order released July 31, 2000, the Commission extended the initial filing date from August 1, 2000 to September 15, 2000. Numbering Resource Optimization, Order, CC Docket No. 99-200, FCC 00-280 (2000). Motion of Teligent, Inc. for Extension of Time to file the Number Resource Utilization/Forecast (NRUF) Report, FCC Form 502, CC Docket No. 99-200 (Teligent Motion). See Letter from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2164A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2164A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2164A1.txt
  • Street NW Washington, DC 20004-1304 Re: Leap Wireless International, Inc. Request for Waiver of Numbering Resource Utilization Threshold Requirement of Commission Rule 52.12(h); Leap Wireless International, Inc. Request for Emergency Assignment of Three NXX Codes in the 412 NPA and Request for Confidentiality Carnell: This letter addresses the petitions filed by Leap Wireless International, Inc. (Leap) seeking waiver of section 52.15(h) of the Federal Communications Commission's (Commission's) rules, which requires carriers to meet a 60% utilization threshold before obtaining additional numbering resources in a given rate center. Specifically, Leap requests three growth central office (CO) codes in each of the 602 and 480 area codes in Phoenix, Arizona, and three growth CO codes in the 412 area code in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2232A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2232A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2232A1.txt
  • GRANTED to the extent herein described. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey J. Carlisle Senior Deputy Chief Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from Morton J. Posner, Counsel for Allegiance Telecom of New York, Inc. and Allegiance Telecom of New Jersey, Inc., to Dorothy Attwood, Chief, Common Carrier Bureau, FCC, dated September 13, 2001. 47 U.S.C. § 251(e). See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 52.15 et. seq. See also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969). Id. See Northeast Cellular Telephone Company, L.P. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 01-2232 Federal Communications Commission DA 01-2232 @& „0ý „0ý „0ý „0ý „0ý „0ý „ðñ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2496A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2496A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2496A1.txt
  • the Matter of ) ) CC Docket No. 99-200 ALLTEL Communications, Inc. ) Emergency Request for Waiver of MTE Rules ) NSD File No. L-01-157 ) ORDER Adopted: October 26, 2001 Released: October 29, 2001 By the Common Carrier Bureau: On October 5, 2001, ALLTEL Communications, Inc. (ALLTEL), a competitive local exchange carrier (CLEC), requested an emergency waiver of Section 52.15(g)(3) of the Federal Communications Commission's (Commission) rules, which sets forth the requirements for receiving growth numbering resources. ALLTEL requests a waiver to receive a new central office (CO or NXX) code in the 501 Numbering Plan Area (NPA) in Little Rock, Arkansas to accommodate a specific request for a new system to serve an existing customer. We find that ALLTEL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2603A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2603A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2603A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Numbering Resource Optimization ) CC Docket No. 99-200 ) Petition of TeleCorp PCS, Inc. ) for Waiver of Section 52.15(g)(3)(iv) ) NSD File No. L-01-155 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(g)(3)(iv) ) ORDER Adopted: November 7, 2001 Released: November 8, 2001 By the Common Carrier Bureau: On August 24, 2001, TeleCorp PCS, Inc., on behalf of its affiliates and subsidiaries, (collectively referred to as TeleCorp), requested a waiver of Section 52.15(g)(3)(iv), which sets forth the requirements for receiving growth numbering resources. TeleCorp
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2604A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2604A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2604A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Numbering Resource Optimization ) CC Docket No. 99-200 ) Petition of Guam Cellular and Paging, Inc. ) for Waiver of Section 52.15(g)(3)(i)(A) ) NSD File No. L-01-156 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(g)(3)(i)(A) ) ORDER Adopted: November 7, 2001 Released: November 8, 2001 By the Common Carrier Bureau: On September 19, 2001, Guam Cellular and Paging, Inc. (Guam Cellular) requested a waiver of Section 52.15(g)(3)(i)(A), which sets forth the requirements for receiving growth numbering resources. Guam Cellular requests that the Federal Communications Commission (Commission)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-497A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-497A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-497A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Numbering Resource Optimization ) CC Docket No. 99-200 ) Petition of XO Communications, Inc. ) for Temporary Waiver of Deadline in ) NSD File No. L-01-32 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6) ) ) Petition of Focal Communications Corporation ) for Temporary Waiver of Deadline ) NSD File No. L-01-33 in 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(6) ) ) BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. ) Emergency Petition for Partial ) NSD File No. L-01-34 Waiver/Extension of Time ) ORDER Adopted: February 22, 2001 Released: February 23, 2001 By the Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau: On March
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-991A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-991A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-991A1.txt
  • D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ALLPAGE OCN# 4276 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CORRECTED COPY File No. EB-01-IH-0017 NAL/Acct. No. 200132080031 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Allpage (``Allpage'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that Allpage is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the North
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-992A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-992A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-992A1.txt
  • of AMERICAN METROCOMM CORP. OCN#s: 8467, 8680, 8675 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017a NAL/Acct. No. 200132080032 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that American Metrocomm Corp. (``American Metrocomm'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that American Metrocomm is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-993A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-993A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-993A1.txt
  • of ATX TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, LTD. OCN#s: 7757, 7061 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017b NAL/Acct. No. 200132080033 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that ATX Telecommunications Services, Ltd. (``ATX'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that ATX is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $ 9,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (the ``Act'') grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-994A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-994A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-994A1.txt
  • In the Matter of CDS NETWORKS, INC. OCN# 4282 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017c NAL/Acct. No. 200132080034 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that CDS Networks, Inc. (``CDS'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that CDS is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the North
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-995A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-995A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-995A1.txt
  • In the Matter of CHICKASAW TELEPHONE CO. OCN# 1980 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017d NAL/Acct. No. 200132080035 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Chickasaw Telephone Co. (``Chickasaw'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that Chickasaw is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the North
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-996A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-996A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-996A1.txt
  • In the Matter of CORE COMMUNICATIONS, INC. OCN# 2593 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017e NAL/Acct. No. 200132080036 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Core Communications, Inc. (``Core'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that Core is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the North
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-997A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-997A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-997A1.txt
  • the Matter of DIGITAL TELEPORT, INC. OCN# 7102 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017f NAL/Acct. No. 200132080037 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Digital Teleport, Inc. (``Digital Teleport'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that Digital Teleport is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-998A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-998A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-998A1.txt
  • D.C. 20554 In the Matter of FULLTEL, INC. OCN# 4589 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017g NAL/Acct. No. 200132080038 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Fulltel, Inc. (``Fulltel'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that Fulltel is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the North
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-999A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-999A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-999A1.txt
  • In the Matter of IDS LONG DISTANCE OCN# 8368 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017h NAL/Acct. No. 200132080039 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that IDS Long Distance (``IDS'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that IDS is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the North
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1073A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1073A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1073A1.txt
  • Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ALLPAGE OCN# 4276 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017 NAL/Acct. No. 200132080031 FRN 0004-3752-26 ORDER Adopted: May 8, 2002 Released: May 10, 2002 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Forfeiture Order, we find that Allpage (``Allpage'') violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. We conclude that Allpage is liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND On April 24, 2001, the Chief, Enforcement Bureau, acting pursuant to delegated authority, issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') to Allpage, proposing a $6,000 forfeiture. We issued the NAL because
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1074A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1074A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1074A1.txt
  • Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of CORE COMMUNICATIONS, INC. OCN# 2593 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017e NAL/Acct. No. 200132080036 FRN 0006-7989-20 ORDER Adopted: May 8, 2002 Released: May 10, 2002 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Forfeiture Order, we find that Core Communications, Inc. (``Core'') violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. We conclude that Core is liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND On April 24, 2001, the Commission by the Chief, Enforcement Bureau, acting pursuant to delegated authority, issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') to Core, proposing a $6,000 forfeiture. We issued
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1075A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1075A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1075A1.txt
  • 20554 In the Matter of AMERICAN METROCOMM CORP. OCN#s: 8467, 8680, 8675 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017a NAL/Acct. No. 200132080032 FRN 0006-8002-62 ORDER Adopted: May 8, 2002 Released: May 10, 2002 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Forfeiture Order, we find that American Metrocomm Corp. (``American Metrocomm'') violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. We conclude that American Metrocomm is liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND On April 24, 2001, the Chief, Enforcement Bureau, acting pursuant to delegated authority, issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') to American Metrocomm, proposing a $6,000 forfeiture. We issued the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1076A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1076A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1076A1.txt
  • the Matter of PAGING SOURCE USA, LLC OCNs#: 4781, 4998, 4999 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017p NAL/Acct. No. 200132080047 FRN 0006-7981-10 ORDER Adopted: May 8, 2002 Released: May 10, 2002 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Forfeiture Order, we find that Paging Source USA, LLC (``Paging Source'') violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. We conclude that Paging Source is liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND On April 24, 2001, the Chief, Enforcement Bureau, acting pursuant to delegated authority, issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') to Paging Source, proposing a $6,000 forfeiture. We issued the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1077A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1077A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1077A1.txt
  • Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of WINSOME PAGING, INC. OCN# 6918 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017u NAL/Acct. No. 200132080052 FRN 0002-8626-21 0003-3006-21 ORDER Adopted: May 8, 2002 Released: May 10, 2002 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Forfeiture Order, we find that Winsome Paging, Inc. (``Winsome'') violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. We conclude that Winsome is liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND On April 24, 2001, the Chief, Enforcement Bureau, acting pursuant to delegated authority, issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') to Winsome, proposing a $6,000 forfeiture. We issued the NAL because
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1078A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1078A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1078A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017i NAL/Acct. No. 200132080040 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: May 8, 2002 Released: May 10, 2002 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. Introduction In this Order, we cancel a monetary forfeiture in the amount of $6,000 proposed against Litelco Communications, Inc. (``Litelco'') for apparent willful violations of 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f), which requires certain carriers to report number utilization and forecast data. II. BACKGROUND On April 24, 2001, the Chief, Enforcement Bureau, acting pursuant to delegated authority, issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') to Litelco, proposing a $6,000 forfeiture. We issued the NAL because it appeared that Litelco had failed to report on its actual and forecast number
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1079A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1079A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1079A1.txt
  • Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Order, we deny NECLEC, LLC's (``NECLEC'') request for cancellation and refund of its payment of a $6,000 forfeiture proposed in our Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''). In the NAL, we determined that NECLEC willfully failed to report its number utilization and forecast data, which constituted an apparent violation of 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f). For the reasons set forth below, we conclude that NECLEC has not justified its request. II. BACKGROUND On April 24, 2001, the Chief, Enforcement Bureau, acting pursuant to delegated authority, issued the NAL to NECLEC, proposing a $6,000 forfeiture. We issued the NAL because it appeared that NECLEC had failed to report on its actual and forecast number usage by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-108A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-108A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-108A1.txt
  • the company have a process for determining what thousands-blocks can be donated? Numbering Resources Optimization, Second Report and Order, Order on Reconsideration in CC Docket 96-98 and in CC Docket No. 99-200, and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in CC Docket No. 99-200, 16 FCC Rcd 306, paras. 81-99 (2000) (NRO Second Report and Order). See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(k). . Depending on the circumstances, a ``for cause'' audit may consist of some, none, or all of the audit procedures contained in the NRO Audit Program. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(k)(2); see also American Inst. of Certified Pub. Accountants, Attestation Standards: Revision and Recodification at §§ 6.01, 6.16 (Jan. 2001). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1347A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1347A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1347A1.txt
  • OCN# 4282 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017c NAL/Acct. No. 200132080038 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: June 7, 2002 Released: June 11, 2002 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Order, we cancel a proposed forfeiture in the amount of $6,000 against CDS Networks, Inc., (``CDS'') for apparent violation of 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f), requiring reports of number utilization and forecast data. II. BACKGROUND On April 24, 2001, the Chief, Enforcement Bureau, acting pursuant to delegated authority, issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') to CDS, proposing a $6,000 forfeiture. We issued the NAL because it appeared that CDS had failed to report on its actual and forecast number usage by filing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1348A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1348A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1348A1.txt
  • the Matter of CHICKASAW TELEPHONE CO. OCN# 1980 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017d NAL/Acct. No. 200132080035 FRN 0003-7326-09 ORDER Adopted: June 7, 2002 Released: June 11, 2002 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture against Chickasaw Telephone Co. (``Chickasaw'') for willful violation of 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f). The noted violation involves Chickasaw's failure to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances of this case, including Chickasaw's response to our Notice of Apparent Liability (``NAL'') , we conclude that Chickasaw has justified a reduction of the proposed forfeiture and that it is liable for a forfeiture in the amount
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1349A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1349A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1349A1.txt
  • of DIGITAL TELEPORT, INC. OCN# 7102 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017f NAL/Acct. No. 200132080037 FRN 0005-6540-09 ORDER Adopted: June 7, 2002 Released: June 11, 2002 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture against Digital Teleport, Inc. (``Digital Teleport'') for willful violation of 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f). The noted violation involves Digital Teleport's failure to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances of this case, including Digital Teleport's response to our Notice of Apparent Liability (``NAL''), we conclude that Digital Teleport has justified a reduction of the proposed forfeiture and that it is liable for a forfeiture in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1350A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1350A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1350A1.txt
  • the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of FULLTEL, INC. OCN# 4589 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017g NAL/Acct. No. 200132080038 FRN 0006-7988-47 ORDER Adopted: June 7, 2002 Released: June 11, 2002 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Order, we find that Fulltel, Inc. (``FullTel'') violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. We conclude that FullTel is liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND On April 24, 2001, the Chief, Enforcement Bureau, acting pursuant to delegated authority, issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') to FullTel, proposing a $6,000 forfeiture. We issued the NAL because
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1351A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1351A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1351A1.txt
  • the Matter of IDS TELCOM, LLC OCN# 8368 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017h NAL/Acct. No. 200132080039 FRN 0006-7988-13 ORDER Adopted: June 20, 2002 Released: June 21, 2002 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture to IDS Telcom, LLC (``IDS'') for willful violation of 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f). The noted violation involves IDS's failure to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances of this case, including IDS's response to our Notice of Apparent Liability (``NAL''), we conclude that IDS has justified a reduction of the proposed forfeiture and that it is liable for a forfeiture in the amount of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1352A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1352A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1352A1.txt
  • of R & G DISTRIBUTORS, INC. OCN# 6841 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017q NAL/Acct. No. 200132080048 FRN 0003-2716-16 ORDER Adopted: June 7, 2002 Released: June 11, 2002 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture against R&G Distributors, Inc. (``R&G'') for willful violation of 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f). The noted violation involves R&G's failure to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances of this case, including R&G's response to our Notice of Apparent Liability (``NAL''), we conclude that R&G is liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND On April 24, 2001, the Chief, Enforcement Bureau,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-172A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-172A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-172A1.txt
  • 22, 2002 Released: January 23, 2002 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: By this Memorandum Opinion and Order we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau, and OpTel, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, OpTel (Texas) Telecom, Inc. We find that the Consent Decree provides for an appropriate resolution of the Bureau's investigation into OpTel's compliance with section 52.15(f) of the Commission's rules, which requires semi-annual reporting of number utilization and forecast data. 2. OpTel (Texas) Telecom, Inc. is no longer a regulated provider of local and long-distance telephone services, because it discontinued such services during August of 2001. The Consent Decree provides, however, among other things, that if in the future OpTel provides local or long-distance telephone service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-172A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-172A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-172A2.txt
  • petitions for protection pursuant to Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. On December 4, 2001, the court presiding over their bankruptcy cases confirmed a plan of reorganization. OpTel, Inc. and certain of its affiliates and subsidiaries, including OpTel (Texas) Telecom, Inc., have effected, or are in the process of effecting, their reorganization pursuant to such confirmed plan. Section 52.15(f) of the Commission's rules requires U.S. carriers receiving numbering resources from the North American Numbering Plan Administrator (``NANPA''), a Pooling Administrator or another telecommunications carrier, to report semiannually on their actual and forecast number usage. These data are to be reported on FCC Form 502, the North American Numbering Plan Numbering Resource Utilization/Forecast (``NRUF'') Report. Carriers and their affiliates and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-235A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-235A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-235A1.txt
  • 200132080045 FRN 0005-9028-61 Adopted: January 30, 2002 Released: February 1, 2002 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: By this Memorandum Opinion and Order we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau, and North County Communications Corp (``NCC''). We find that the Consent Decree provides for an appropriate resolution of the Bureau's investigation into NCC's compliance with section 52.15(f) of the Commission's rules, which requires semi-annual reporting of number utilization and forecast data. Among other things, the Consent Decree provides that NCC will implement a program to ensure its future compliance with the Act and the Commission's rules and policies. In addition, the Consent Decree provides that NCC will make a voluntary contribution to the United States Treasury in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-235A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-235A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-235A2.txt
  • facilities-based competitive local exchange carrier in California, Oregon, Washington and Arizona, providing telecommunications services to its customers. NCC competes directly in major local markets in these states with large incumbent local exchange carriers such as U.S. West for local service customers, as well as with interexchange carriers such as AT&T, Sprint and MCI for long distance telecommunications service customers. Section 52.15(f) of the Commission's rules requires U.S. carriers receiving numbering resources from the North American Numbering Plan Administrator (``NANPA''), a Pooling Administrator or another telecommunications carrier, to report semiannually on their actual and forecast number usage. These data are to be reported on FCC Form 502, the North American Numbering Plan Numbering Resource Utilization/Forecast (``NRUF'') Report. Carriers and their affiliates and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2576A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2576A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2576A1.txt
  • petition requesting the Commission to waive the North American Numbering Plan Administrator's (NANPA) decision to deny Choice One's request for 1,000 numbers so that Choice One may satisfy a specific customer request. On May 13, 2003, Choice One filed a motion to withdraw its Petition. According to Choice One, it filed the above-captioned Petition with the Commission because, although section 52.15(g)(3)(iv) of the Commission's rules allows carriers to challenge the NANPA's decision with the appropriate state commission, Choice One believed that the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (Indiana Commission) would not respond to its request. Choice One seeks to withdraw the Petition because the Indiana Commission has indicated that it will address Choice One's Petition. Given that Choice One intends to seek
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2902A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2902A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2902A1.txt
  • to meet the six-month Months-To-Exhaust (MTE) requirement for obtaining additional numbering resources. We find that Qwest has satisfied the requirements for the safety valve mechanism set forth in the Commission's Numbering Resource Optimization Third Report and Order because Qwest has demonstrated that it cannot satisfy a specific customer request from its inventory. II. BACKGROUND Commission's Numbering Resource Optimization Rules. Section 52.15 of the Commission's rules requires, among other things, that a service provider seeking growth numbering resources (central office codes or thousand-blocks) must submit with its application: (1) a MTE worksheet that shows the utilization level for the past six months by rate center and the projected monthly utilization for the next twelve months and (2) the current utilization level for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3034A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3034A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3034A1.txt
  • October 2, 2003 Released: October 3, 2003 By the Assistant Division Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division: We grant the request of Xspedius Management Co., LLC (Xspedius) to withdraw its petition. In the petition, Xspedius requested an extension of the February 1, 2003 deadline for submitting a numbering forecast and utilization report (Number Resources Utilization/Forecast ``NRUF'' Report) as mandated by Section 52.15(f)(6)(i) of the Commission's rules. On September 30, 2003, Xspedius notified the Commission that it had submitted its NRUF Report and submitted a request to withdraw the above captioned petition. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the request to withdraw the above-captioned
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-361A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-361A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-361A1.txt
  • ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017s NAL/Acct. No. 200132080050 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: February 5, 2003 Released: February 7, 2003 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we cancel a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') that the Enforcement Bureau issued to USA Mobile Communications, Inc. II (``USA Mobile'') for apparent willful violation of 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f), which requires certain carriers to report number utilization and forecast data. We issued the NAL because it appeared that USA Mobile had failed to report on its actual and forecast number usage by filing FCC Form 502, the North American Numbering Plan Numbering Resource Utilization/Forecast (``NRUF'') Report that was due on September 15, 2000. Arch Wireless, Inc. (``Arch'') responded to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-423A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-423A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-423A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017b NAL/Acct. No. 200132080033 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: February 12, 2003 Released: February 14, 2003 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we cancel a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') that the Enforcement Bureau issued to ATX Telecommunications Services, Ltd. (``ATX'') for apparent willful violation of 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f), which requires certain carriers to report number utilization and forecast data. We issued the NAL because it appeared that ATX had failed to report on its actual and forecast number usage by filing FCC Form 502, the North American Numbering Plan Numbering Resource Utilization/Forecast (``NRUF'') Report that was due on September 15, 2000. ATX responded to the NAL and states
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-424A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-424A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-424A1.txt
  • 20554 In the Matter of NORTH AMERICAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION OCN# 8770 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017m NAL/Acct. No. 200132080044 FRN No. 0004375564 ORDER Adopted: February 12, 2003 Released: February 14, 2003 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Forfeiture Order, we find that North American Telecommunications Corporation (``NATC'') violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. We conclude that NATC is liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND On April 24, 2001, the Chief, Enforcement Bureau, acting pursuant to delegated authority, issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') to NATC, proposing a $6,000 forfeiture. We issued the NAL because
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-463A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-463A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-463A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017k NAL/Acct. No. 200132080042 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: February 19, 2003 Released: February 21, 2003 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Order, we cancel a monetary forfeiture in the amount of $6,000 proposed against Net-Tel Corporation (``Net-Tel'') for its apparent willful violation of 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f), which requires certain carriers to report number utilization and forecast data. II. BACKGROUND On April 24, 2001, the Chief, Enforcement Bureau, acting pursuant to delegated authority, issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') to Net-Tel, proposing a $6,000 forfeiture. We issued the NAL because it appeared that Net-Tel had failed to report on its actual and forecast number
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-485A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-485A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-485A1.txt
  • CELLULAR TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND INTERNET ASSOCIATION'S PETITION FOR FORBEARANCE FROM FURTHER INCREASES IN THE NUMBERING UTILIZATION THRESHOLD CC Docket No. 99-200 Comment Date: March 17, 2003 Reply Comment Date: March 24, 2003 The Wireline Competition Bureau seeks comment on the petition filed by the Cellular Telecommunications and Internet Association (CTIA) seeking forbearance from further increases in the numbering utilization threshold. Section 52.15(h) of the Commission's rules require that ``[a]ll applicants for growth numbering resources shall achieve a 60% utilization threshold . . . for the rate center in which they are requesting growth numbering resources.'' This 60% utilization threshold increased by 5% on June 30, 2002, and increases annually thereafter until the utilization threshold reaches 75%. CTIA requests that the Commission forbear
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-579A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-579A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-579A1.txt
  • Matter of VANGUARD CELLULAR SYSTEMS, INC. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017t NAL/Acct. No. 200132080051 FRN No. 0006798052 ORDER Adopted: February 26, 2003 Released: February 28, 2003 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture against Vanguard Cellular Systems, Inc. (``Vanguard'') for willful violation of 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f). The noted violation involves Vanguard's failure to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances of this case, including the response to our Notice of Apparent Liability (``NAL''), we conclude that a reduction of the proposed forfeiture is warranted and that Vanguard is liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $3,000.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-804A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-804A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-804A1.txt
  • the Lifeline rules in Part 54. The staff also recommends eliminating certain rules in Part 36, subpart F that refer to specific time periods that have lapsed. The staff further recommends revisions to certain rule sections in Part 54 to update certain provisions and dates, for removal of provisions for which funding periods have expired, and for elimination of sections 52.15(d)-(e) and 52.23(c)-(e)(elapsed implementation dates). Other recommendations. CTIA, in a petition for rulemaking filed in another docket, proposes to eliminate section 1.815 of the Commission's rules, which requires common carriers to file annual employment reports (FCC Form 395) with the Commission. Because this data collection is administered by WCB's Industry Analysis and Technology Division, WCB reviewed the rule as part of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-944A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-944A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-944A1.txt
  • Adopted: March 27, 2003 Released: March 27, 2003 By the Assistant Division Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division: On January 30, 2003, BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. (BellSouth) filed the above-captioned Emergency Petition for Waiver and Extension of Time. In the petition, BellSouth requested an extension of the February 1, 2003 deadline for submitting a Numbering Resource Utilization/Forecast (NRUF) as mandated by Section 52.15(f)(6)(i) of the Commission's rules. On March 3, 2003, BellSouth submitted a request to withdraw the above-captioned petition. We grant the request to withdraw and dismiss the petition. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request to withdraw the above-captioned Request for Emergency
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-140A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-140A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-140A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Numbering Resource Optimization Mid-Tex Cellular, Ltd. Request for Waiver of Section 52.15(g)(3)(i)(A)(B) 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(g)(3)(i)(A)(B) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CC Docket No. 99-200 ORDER Adopted: January 22, 2004 Released: January 22, 2004 By the Assistant Division Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division: On January 7, 2004, Mid-Tex Cellular, Ltd. (Mid-Tex Cellular) filed the above-captioned Petition for Waiver, Expedited Action Request. In the petition, Mid-Tex Cellular requested a waiver of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1721A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1721A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1721A1.txt
  • Jr., Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, from Gary Phillips, General Attorney & Assistant General Counsel, SBC Telecommunications, Inc. (May 28, 2004) (Phillips Letter). See Phillips Letter. Id at 1. Id. Employees will obtain the service at their business locations. Id. at 3. Id. at 3. Id. at 3-4. See Phillips Letter at 1; see also 47 U.S.C. § 52.15(g)(2)(i). See e.g., 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 303(r). See Phillips Letter. For example, the Bureau granted Verizon Special Temporary Authority to conduct a limited trial of fiber-to-the-home technology before the sunset of an advanced services affiliate requirement in the Bell Atlantic-GTE Merger Order. In re Application of GTE Corporation, Transferor, and Bell Atlantic Corporation, Transferee, 16 FCC Rcd 11810 (Comm. Carrier
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2144A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2144A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2144A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 04-2144 COMMENT SOUGHT ON SBC IP COMMUNICATIONS, INC. PETITION FOR LIMITED WAIVER OF SECTION 52.15(g)(2)(i) OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES REGARDING ACCESS TO NUMBERING RESOURCES PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED CC Docket No. 99-200 Released Date: July 16, 2004 Comment Date: August 16, 2004 Reply Comment Date: August 31, 2004 On July 7, 2004, SBC IP Communications, Inc. (SBCIP) filed a petition with the Commission for a limited waiver of section 52.15(g)(2)(i) of the Commission's rules. SBCIP requests
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3906A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3906A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3906A1.txt
  • the Matter of AT&T Corp. Compliance with Rules Regarding Thousands-Block Number Pooling ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-04-IH-0271 Acct. No. 200532080021 FRN: 0005937974 ORDER Adopted: December 21, 2004 Released: December 21, 2004 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt a Consent Decree terminating an investigation into possible violations by AT&T Corp. (``AT&T'') of sections 52.15 and 52.20(c) of the Commission's rules, with respect to thousands-block number pooling in certain rate centers. The Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and AT&T have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would terminate the Bureau's investigation. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. We have reviewed the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluated
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1288A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1288A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1288A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 05-1288 May 4, 2005 WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU SEEKS COMMENT ON QWEST COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION PETITION FOR LIMITED WAIVER OF SECTION 52.15(g)(2)(i) OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES REGARDING ACCESS TO NUMBERING RESOURCES PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED CC Docket No. 99-200 Comment Date: June 4, 2005 Reply Comments Date: June 20, 2005 Qwest Communications Corporation have filed a petition with the Commission for a limited waiver of section 52.15(g)(2)(i) of the Commission's rules. The petition request a limited waiver of the Commission's numbering rules to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1290A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1290A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1290A1.txt
  • DA 05-1290 May 4, 2005 WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU SEEKS COMMENT ON PAC-WEST TELECOMM, INC., PETITION FOR CLARIFICATION PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED CC Docket No. 99-200 COMMENT Date: June 4, 2005 Reply Comment Date: June 20, 2005 Pac-West Telecomm, Inc., (Pac-West) has filed a petition for clarification of the Commission's decision to grant SBC Internet Services, Inc. (SBCIS) a waiver of section 52.15(g)(2)(i) of the Commission's rules. The waiver allows SBCIS to obtain numbering resources directly from the NANPA and/or the Pooling Administrator until the Commission adopts final numbering rules for IP-enabled services. We invite comment on Pac-West's petition. Pursuant to applicable procedures set forth in sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments on or before June
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-271A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-271A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-271A1.txt
  • of MCI, Inc. Compliance with Rules Regarding Thousands-Block Number Pooling ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-04-IH-0469 Account No. 200532080120 FRN No. 0010856284 ORDER Adopted: February 2, 2005 Released: February 3, 2005 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt a Consent Decree terminating an investigation into possible violations by MCI, Inc. (``MCI'') of sections 52.15 and 52.20(c) of the Commission's rules, with respect to thousands-block number pooling in certain rate centers. The Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and MCI have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would terminate the Bureau's investigation. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. We have reviewed the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluated
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-409A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-409A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-409A1.txt
  • Matter of. Comcast Corporation Compliance with Rules Regarding Thousands-block Number Pooling ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-04-IH-0465 Acct. No. 200532080124 FRN: 0006329247 ORDER Adopted: February 14, 2005 Released: February 15, 2005 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt a Consent Decree terminating an investigation into possible violations by Comcast Corporation (``Comcast'') of sections 52.15 and 52.20(c) of the Commission's rules, with respect to thousands-block number pooling in certain rate centers. The Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Comcast have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would terminate the Bureau's investigation. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. We have reviewed the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluated
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-663A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-663A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-663A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 05-663 March 11, 2005 WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU SEEKS COMMENT ON RNK, INC. D/B/A RNK TELECOM, NUVIO CORPORATION, UNIPOINT ENHANCED SERVICES D/B/A POINTONE, DIALPAD COMMUNICATIONS, INC., VONAGE HOLDINGS CORPORATION, AND VOEX, INC. PETITIONS FOR LIMITED WAIVER OF SECTION 52.15(g)(2)(i) OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES REGARDING ACCESS TO NUMBERING RESOURCES PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED CC Docket No. 99-200 Comment Date: April 11, 2005 Reply Comment Date: April 26, 2005 RNK, Inc. d/b/a RNK Telecom (RNK), Nuvio Corporation (Nuvio), Unipoint Enhanced Services d/b/a PointOne (PointOne), Dialpad Communications, Inc. (Dialpad), Vonage Holdings Corporation (Vonage), and VoEX, Inc.(VoEX) have filed petitions with the Commission for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1863A1.txt
  • pertain to the United States. Need: The rules provide a framework for ensuring fair and impartial access to numbering resources, which is a critical component of encouraging a competitive telecommunications market in the United States. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 251. Section Numbers and Titles: 52.7 Definitions. 52.9 General requirements. 52.11 North American Numbering Council. 52.13 North American Numbering Plan Administrator. 52.15 Central office code administration. 52.17 Costs of number administration. 52.19 Area code relief. SUBPART C -- NUMBER PORTABILITY Brief Description: These rules implement the requirements of section 251(b)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, which requires all LECs ``to provide, to the extent technically feasible, number portability in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Commission.'' Need: This
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-333A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-333A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-333A2.txt
  • Through Corporate Control, Secs. 63.01, 63.03 and 63.04 11/30/08 3060-0991 AM Measurement Data 05/31/08 3060-0992 Secs. 54.507(d)(1)-(4) and CC Docket No. 96-45 01/31/08 3060-0994 Flexibility for Delivery of Communications by Mobile Satellite Service Providers in the 2 GHz Band, the L-Band, and the 1.6/2.4 GHz Band 01/31/07 3060-0995 Sec. 1.2105(c) 05/31/08 3060-0996 AM Auction Section 307(b) Submissions 05/31/08 3060-0997 Sec. 52.15(k) 05/31/08 3060-0998 Sec. 87.109 03/31/08 3060-0999 Exemption of Public Mobile Service Phones from the Hearing Aid Compatibility Act 06/30/07 3060-1000 Sec. 87.147 01/31/08 3060-1001 FCC 337 05/31/08 3060-1003 Telecommunications Carrier Emergency Contact Information 04/30/08 3060-1004 Revision of the Commission's Rules to Ensure Compatibility with Enhanced 911 Emergency Calling Systems 05/31/06 3060-1005 Numbering Resource Optimization - Phase 3 06/30/08 3060-1007 Streamlining
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-839A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-839A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-839A1.txt
  • No. 99-200 Comments Due: April 28, 2006 Reply Comments Due: May 5, 2006 On March 28, 2006, Country Code 1 ENUM LLC (``ENUM LLC'') filed a petition for limited waiver with the Commission to allow ENUM LLC to obtain North American Numbering Plan (NANP) numbering resources. The petition requests that the Wireline Competition Bureau grant a limited waiver of section 52.15(g) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(g), to allow ENUM LLC to obtain numbering resources directly from the Pooling Administrator to be used in conjunction with a trial of ENUM technology within the Country Code 1 North American Numbering Plan. This Public Notice establishes the procedural requirements relating to consideration of ENUM LLC's petition. This matter shall be treated
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2893A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2893A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2893A1.txt
  • in the State of Kansas disaster areas due to severe storms, tornados, and flooding. In an effort to assist the telecommunications industry as it restores service in the affected areas of Kansas we grant, on our own motion, a temporary waiver of the Commission's rule for aging telephone numbers for residential customers in those areas declared as disaster areas. Section 52.15(f)(ii) of the Commission's numbering rules, 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(ii), allows carriers to age numbers previously assigned to residential customers for no more than 90 days before making them available for assignment to another customer. Waiver of this rule will allow carriers in the affected areas to disconnect temporarily customers' telephone service, upon request, to avoid billing issues, and then reinstate
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A4.txt
  • 1.51 TV-MA-VTelevision 0.15 0.16 0.23 0.22 Anyofthethreeabove 2.95 3.01 3.33 3.14 Anyofthelasttwoabove 1.52 1.56 1.79 1.73 ReligiousProgramming NetworksShowingPrimarilyReligiousProgramming 1.64 1.56 1.49 1.40 "ReligiousProgramming" 3.31 3.15 2.92 2.79 OverallTargeting AverageTVContentRating(wherenotedforTV) 3.71 3.75 3.84 3.93 AverageMPAARating(wherenotedformovies) 3.99 3.93 3.98 3.95 Observations 61,31464,56067,53071,984 Notes:Reportedinthetableisthepercentageofquarter-hoursofprogrammingbyprogramtypeandyear. ItistheanalogofTable6splitoutbyyear.Averageisoverthesamenetworksandtimeperiodsdescribed inthenotestoTable6.Source:Authorcalculations.39 Table11: ProgramAvailabilitybyProgramTypeandTime 6:00p.m.-12:00a.m.EST(orequivalent),2weeks/year,2003-2006 Variable 2003 2004 2005 2006 NewsProgramming AnyNews 47.79 46.11 48.59 51.07 NetworkNews 55.60 52.73 52.15 47.71 LocalNews 46.52 45.14 48.11 51.53 PublicAffairsProgramming 57.48 57.79 54.52 48.05 MinorityProgramming NetworksTargetingBlackAudiences 17.91 19.00 21.41 23.61 TargetingLatinoAudiences OnNetworksTargetingLatinoAudiences 14.14 13.43 13.50 13.81 Spanish-LanguageProgramming 13.57 12.97 12.24 14.14 NetworksTargetingOtherDiverseAudiences 13.29 14.97 16.92 19.47 Children'sProgramming "Children'sProgramming" 28.78 34.62 41.07 42.20 GMoviesorTV-Y/TV-Y7TV 35.89 39.80 44.39 43.65 Eitheroftheabove 33.42 37.89 43.02 43.05 FamilyProgramming NetworksTargetingFamilies 51.40 53.93 54.73 53.65 TY-GProgramming 41.66 39.66 40.46 36.79
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4112A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4112A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4112A1.txt
  • the State of California fire management assistance areas due to severe wildfires. In an effort to assist the telecommunications industry as it restores service in the affected areas of California, we grant, on our own motion, a temporary waiver of the Commission's rule for aging telephone numbers for residential customers in those areas declared as fire management assistance areas. Section 52.15(f)(ii) of the Commission's numbering rules allows carriers to age numbers previously assigned to residential customers for no more than 90 days before making them available for assignment to another customer. Waiver of this rule will allow carriers in the affected areas to disconnect temporarily customers' telephone service, upon request, to avoid billing issues, and then reinstate the same number when
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4354A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4354A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4354A2.txt
  • Phones 10/31/08 3060-0989 Secs. 63.01, 63.03 and 63.04 11/30/08 3060-0991 AM Measurement Data 05/31/08 3060-0992 Secs. 54.507(d)(1)-(4) and CC Docket No. 96-45 01/31/08 3060-0994 Flexibility for Delivery of Communications by Mobile Satellite Service Providers in the 2 GHz Band, the L-Band, and the 1.6/2.4 GHz Band 01/31/10 3060-0995 Sec. 1.2105(c) 05/31/08 3060-0996 AM Auction Section 307(b) Submissions 05/31/08 3060-0997 Sec. 52.15(k) 05/31/08 3060-0998 Sec. 87.109 08/31/10 3060-0999 Sec. 20.19 09/30/10 3060-1000 Sec. 87.147 01/31/08 3060-1001 FCC 337 05/31/08 3060-1003 Communications Disaster Information Reporting System (DIRS) 07/31/10 3060-1004 Revision of the Commission's Rules to Ensure Compatibility with Enhanced 911 Emergency Calling Systems 09/30/09 3060-1005 Numbering Resource Optimization - Phase 3 06/30/08 3060-1007 Streamlining and Other Revisions of Part 25 of the Commission's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2209A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2209A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2209A1.txt
  • INC. PETITION FOR LIMITED WAIVER OF NUMBERING ACCESS REQUIREMENTS PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED CC Docket No. 99-200 Comment Date: October 20, 2008 Reply Comments Date: October 27, 2008 On September 8, 2008, Vixxi Solutions, Inc. (Vixxi) filed a petition with the Commission for a limited waiver of numbering access requirements. Specifically, the petition requests a limited and transitional waiver of section 52.15(g)(2)(i) of the Commission's rules to allow Vixxi to obtain directly certain numbering resources for its business of connecting 911 calls from customers to the appropriate Public Safety Answering Points. We invite comment on the Vixxi Petition. Interested parties may file comments on or before October 20, 2008, and reply comments on or before October 27, 2008. All pleadings should reference
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2375A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2375A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2375A1.txt
  • ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-08-IH-5265 NAL/Acct. No. 201032080005 FRN No. 0005052808 NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE AND ORDER Adopted: November 10, 2009 Released: November 12, 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Global NAPs California, Inc. (``Global NAPs''), apparently violated sections 52.15(k)(1) and 52.15(f) of the Commission's rules, and Commission orders, by willfully and repeatedly failing to submit to a Commission numbering audit, failing to maintain accurate number use data and submitting inaccurate North American Numbering Plan Numbering Resource Utilization/Forecast (``NRUF'') reports, failing to submit its August 2009 NRUF report, and failing to respond on a timely and complete basis to a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1268A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1268A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1268A1.txt
  • (Commission established $20,000 as the base forfeiture amount for a carrier's failure to file accurate revenue on FCC Form 497, proposing a $320,000 forfeiture for VCI's sixteen apparent violations); Global NAPs California, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 24 FCC Rcd 13545, 13554-56 ¶¶ 24-27 (Enf. Bur. 2009) (assessing $25,000 proposed forfeiture against a carrier for apparently violating Section 52.15(f) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f), finding that filing of inaccurate reports undermines the Commission's ability to monitor and ensure the efficient allocation of telephone numbering resources) (``Global NAPs California, Inc.''); Cardinal Broadband LLC, aka Sovereign Telecommunications, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 23 FCC Rcd 12233, 12235-37 ¶¶ 6-11 (Enf. Bur. 2008) (assessing a $25,000 forfeiture against an
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1647A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1647A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1647A1.txt
  • No. 96-98, NSD File No. L-00-161; see also, Letter from Lawrence E. Strickling, Chief, Common Carrier Bureau, to Lawrence G. Malone, General Counsel, New York State Department of Public Service, DA 99-2696, dated December 3, 1999. Proposed 708 Relief Plan and 630 Numbering Plan Area Code by Ameritech-Illinois, Declaratory Ruling and Order, 10 FCC Rcd 4596 (1995). 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(g)(3)(iii), (h). Letter from John T. Nakahata, Counsel to Level 3 Communications, LLC, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, dated December 19, 2008. See Sorenson Communications, Inc. Petition for Declaratory Ruling or Limited Waiver of the Commission's Rules, CG Docket No. 03-123, WC Docket No. 05-196 at n.26 (filed Apr. 13, 2009) (stating that Level 3 has exhausted virtually all of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2155A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2155A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2155A1.txt
  • Division, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (the ``Bureau'') and PageData LLC (``PageData'') and WaveSent LLC (``WaveSent''). The Consent Decree terminates the enforcement proceedings initiated by the Bureau against PageData and WaveSent for possible violation of section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``the Act''), section 52.15(f) of the Commission's rules and Commission orders. The Bureau and PageData and WaveSent have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find that the public interest would be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1033A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1033A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1033A1.txt
  • the State of Missouri a major disaster due to severe storms, tornados, and flooding. In an effort to assist the telecommunications industry as it restores service in the affected areas of Missouri, we grant, on our own motion, a temporary waiver of the Commission's rule for aging telephone numbers for residential customers in those areas declared a major disaster. Section 52.15(f)(ii) of the Commission's rules allows carriers to age numbers for no more than 90 days before making them available for assignment to other customers. Waiver of this rule will allow carriers in the affected areas to disconnect temporarily customers' telephone service, upon request, to avoid billing issues, and then reinstate the same numbers when service is reconnected in those areas.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1333A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1333A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1333A1.txt
  • and Title: 52.5(i) Definitions. SUBPART B-ADMINISTRATION Brief Description: Section 52.7(g)-(j) sets forth definitions of terms used in the Commission's rules governing thousands-block pooling. Need: This rule is necessary to allow the Commission to monitor closely the way numbering resources are used within the NANP. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 201-205 and 251. Section Number and Title: 52.7(g)-(j) Definitions. Brief Description: Section 52.15(f)-(j) sets forth a mandatory data reporting requirement, a uniform set of categories of numbers for which carriers must report their utilization, requirements for applications for numbering resources, a utilization threshold framework to increase carrier accountability and incentives to use numbers efficiently, and procedures for reclamation of numbering resources. Need: This rule is necessary to allow the Commission to monitor closely
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2074A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2074A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2074A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 11-2074 December 27, 2011 WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU SEEKS TO REFRESH RECORD ON PETITIONS FOR WAIVER OF COMMISSION'S RULES REGARDING ACCESS TO NUMBERING RESOURCES PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED CC Docket No. 99-200 Comments Due: January 11, 2012 By this Public Notice, we seek to refresh the record on numerous petitions for limited waiver of section 52.15(g)(2)(i) of the Commission's rules to allow the requesting Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) providers direct access to numbering resources from the North American Numbering Plan Administrator and the Pooling Administrator. As part of this record, earlier this year, Vonage Holdings Corporation (Vonage) renewed its request for a waiver and filed supplemental materials in support of its petition. Vonage asserts that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-26A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-26A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-26A1.txt
  • Matter of Numbering Resource Optimization ) ) ) ) CC Docket No. 99-200 Order Extended Comment Date: January 25, 2012 Adopted: January 9, 2012 Released: January 9, 2012 By the Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau: In this Order, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) grants a 14-day extension of the comment deadline to update the record regarding petitions for waiver of section 52.15(g)(2)(i) of the Commission's rules. This extension will ensure that parties have sufficient time to consider the important issues raised in this proceeding. On December 27, 2011, the Bureau released a Public Notice seeking to refresh the record on numerous petitions for limited waiver of section 52.15(g)(2)(i) of the Commission's rules to allow the requesting Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) providers
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-468A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-468A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-468A1.txt
  • Tz /OPBaseFont3 10 Tf (52.5.) Tj 1 0 0 1 73.65 138 Tm 57 Tz /OPBaseFont0 10 Tf (2) Tj 1 0 0 1 92.4 133.449 Tm 96 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (C.F,R.) Tj 1 0 0 1 121.9 132.049 Tm 71 Tz /OPBaseFont0 10 Tf (§) Tj 1 0 0 1 129.099 133.75 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont3 10 Tf (52.15\(f\). See Numbering Resource Optimization,) Tj 1 0 0 1 330.95 133.949 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (CC Docket No. 99-200, Report and Order and) Tj 1 0 0 1 73.65 122.199 Tm (Further Notice of Proposed Rule Maldng, 15 FCC Rcd.) Tj 1 0 0 1 299.5 122.199 Tm 98 Tz /OPBaseFont3 10 Tf (7574, 7578-79) Tj 1 0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-469A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-469A1.txt
  • business days afier the filing of an Acknowledgment of Confidentiality to object to the release of the data to a particular person who requests permission to review it. 6SeeApplication of Celico Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless and SpectrumCo LLC for Consent to Assign Licenses,WT Docket No. 12-4,NRUF/LNP Protective Order,DA 12-468 (WTB, Mar. 28, 2012). 747 U.S.C. § 251. 8 C.F.R. § 52.15(f).SeeNumbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200,Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making,15 FCC Rcd 7574, 7578-79 ¶5(2000). 91d.at760778. 2 If the Commission receives no opposition from affected parties by April 9, 2012, the Commission will place the NRUF, LNP and Carrier-to-Carrier LNP data into the record subject to the safeguards contained in the NRUF Protective Order. If
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-633A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-633A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-633A1.txt
  • 12-633 April 24, 2012 WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU SEEKS COMMENT ON SMARTEDGENET, LLC AND MILLICORP, LLC PETITIONS FOR LIMITED WAIVER OF COMMISSION'S RULES REGARDING ACCESS TO TELEPHONE NUMBERS PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED CC Docket No. 99-200 Comment Date: May 8, 2012 Reply Comment Date: May 15, 2012 SmartEdgeNet, LLC (SEN) and Millicorp, LLC (Millicorp) have filed petitions seeking limited waiver of section 52.15(g)(2)(i) of the Commission's rules. The petitions request a limited waiver to allow SEN and Millicorp to obtain telephone numbers directly from the North American Numbering Plan Administrator and the Pooling Administrator. Both SEN and Millicorp state that they seek a waiver comparable to the limited waiver granted to SBC Internet Services, Inc., so they can obtain numbers necessary to deploy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209265A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209265A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209265A1.txt
  • end of the last sentence: ``or the Pooling Administrator.'' 7. On page 54, paragraph 123, delete from the penultimate sentence: ``find some merit and''; add after ``seek comment'' in the same sentence: ``on.'' 8. On page 69, paragraph 166, replace ``benefit'' with ``cost'' in the penultimate sentence. 9. On page 81, Appendix A, delete ``(s)'' after ``parent company'' in section 52.15(f)(3)(ii). 10. On page 82, Appendix A, change Paragraph ``5.'' To ``3.''; change ``Section 52.17'' to ``Section 52.16.'' 11. On page 83, Appendix A, change Paragraph ``6.'' To ``4.'' 12. On Page 94, Appendix C, Paragraph 1, third sentence, change ``VII'' to ``VIII.'' FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Diane Griffin Harmon Deputy Chief, Network Services Division Common Carrier Bureau (continued....) Federal Communications Commission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209297A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209297A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209297A1.txt
  • end of the last sentence: ``or the Pooling Administrator.'' 7. On page 54, paragraph 123, delete from the penultimate sentence: ``find some merit and''; add after ``seek comment'' in the same sentence: ``on.'' 8. On page 69, paragraph 166, replace ``benefit'' with ``cost'' in the penultimate sentence. 9. On page 81, Appendix A, delete ``(s)'' after ``parent company'' in section 52.15(f)(3)(ii). 10. On page 82, Appendix A, change Paragraph ``5.'' To ``3.''; change ``Section 52.17'' to ``Section 52.16.'' 11. On page 83, Appendix A, change Paragraph ``6.'' To ``4.'' 12. On Page 94, Appendix C, Paragraph 1, third sentence, change ``VII'' to ``VIII.'' FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Diane Griffin Harmon Deputy Chief, Network Services Division Common Carrier Bureau (continued....) Federal Communications Commission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210187A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210187A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210187A1.txt
  • Telecommunications Alliance, BellSouth Corporation, AT&T Corporation, WorldCom Phase III, The United States Telecom Association. In the Matter of Amendment of Section 73.202(b), Table of Allotments, FM Broadcast Stations (Alberta, Virginia, and Whitakers, North Carolina)(MM Docket No. 00-245/RM 9971). Reply Comments - MainQuad Broadcasting, Inc. In the Matter of Number Resource Optimization (CC Docket No. 99-200). Petition for Waiver of Section 52.15(f)(6) Reporting Deadline. In the Matter of Standardized and Enhanced Disclosure Requirements for Television Broadcast Licensee Public Interest Obligations (MM Docket No. 00-168). Reply Comments - People for Better TV. In the Matter of Applications for Review - BellSouth Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services (CC Docket No. 01-22). Opposition - BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. In the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212237A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212237A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212237A1.txt
  • The Chief, Enforcement Bureau, acting pursuant to delegated authority, today issued Notices of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NALs'') to 22 carriers for failing to file mandatory reports as to their actual and forecast number usage. The fines issued pursuant to these NALs are for amounts ranging between $6,000 and $12,000 based on the numbering resources assigned to each carrier. Section 52.15(f) of the Commission's rules requires U.S. carriers receiving numbering resources from the North American Numbering Plan Administrator (``NANPA''), a Pooling Administrator, or another telecommunications carrier, to file NRUF reports semi-annually. The reporting requirements were adopted to facilitate the monitoring of numbering resource usage and to promote more efficient use of numbering resources and forestall premature exhaustion of numbering resources. Each
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212491A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212491A1.txt
  • DIGITAL VOICE AUDIO AND DATA 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 808KG7D DIGITAL VOICE AUDIO AND DATA 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 153KG7D DIGITAL VOICE AUDIO AND DATA 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 614KG7D DIGITAL OUTROUTE DATA DIG AUDIO/VOICE 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 1M29G7D 67.29 dBW DIGITAL OUTROUTE DATA DIG AUDIO/VOICE 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 1M29G7D ANDREW Hub 5.6M 5.6 meters ANTENNA ID: 5.60M 52.15 dBW ANALOG NBFM 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 30K0F8E 69.60 dBW ANALOG SCPC 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 360KF8E 67.67 dBW DIG 2.9 CLI VIDEO & DIG AUDIO/DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 1M20G7D 67.78 dBW DIG OUTROUTE DATA DIG AUDIO/VOICE 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 1M23G7D 71.62 dBW DIG 6.6 CLI VIDEO & DIG AUDIO/DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 2M98G7D 74.20 dBW ANALOG
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-216461A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-216461A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-216461A1.txt
  • AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. In the Matter of Deployment of Wireline Services Offering Advanced Telecommunications Capability (CC Docket No. 98-147). Joint Petition for Partial Clarification or Reconsideration - Association for Local Telecommunications Services, e.spire Communications, Inc., KMC Telecom, Inc., McLeodUSA Telecommunications Services, Inc. and NuVox, Inc. In re: Guam Cellular and Paging, Inc. Petition for Waiver of FCC Rule Section 52.15(g)(3)(I)(A) (CC Docket No. 99-200). Petition for Waiver - Expedited Action Requested - Guam Cellular and Paging, Inc., Comments - WorldCom, Inc., AT&T Corporation, The United States Telecom Association. September 20 In the Matter of the Commission's Rules to Ensure Compatibility with Enhanced 911 Emergency Calling Systems (CC Docket No. 94-102). Petition for Limited Waiver - South No. 5 RSA LP
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-235200A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-235200A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-235200A1.txt
  • Network Incorporated and NOSVA Limited Partnership Order to Show Cause and Notice of Opportunity for Hearing (EB Docket No. 03-96). Opposition to Motion to Strike and Reply to Opposition to Petition for Reconsideration - NOS Communications, Inc., Affinity Network Incorporated and NOSVA Limited Partnership. June 2 In re Guam Cellular and Paging, Inc. Petition for Waiver of FCC Rule Section 52.15(g)(3)(i)(A) (CC Docket No. 99-200). Petition for Waiver -Expedited Action Requested - Guam Cellular Paing, Inc. June 3 In the Matter of i2way Request for Declaratory Ruling Regarding the Ten-Channel Limit of Section 90.187(e) of the Commission's Rules/Hexagram Petition to Deny i2way Applications (WT Docket No. 02-196). Reply to Opposition to Application for Review - i2way Corporation. June 4 In the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256288A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256288A1.pdf
  • LNPA Working Group Status Report to the NANC Numbering Oversight Working Group (NOWG) Report Formation of ``Billing and Collection Agent Oversight Working Group'' List of NANC Accomplishments (January 2002 - Present) Summary of the Meeting. Robert Nelson, NARUC, Michigan, proposed that an item be added to the Agenda concerning the implications of the SBC Petition for Limited Waiver of Section 52.15(g)(2)(i) of the Commission's Rules on access to numbering resources. Mr. Nelson noted that this Petition has been subject to Comments and Reply Comments at the FCC. He advised that the NANC consider this item because of its long-term implications for potential exhaust of the North American Numbering Plan (NANP) that the NANC has not contemplated. Chairman Atkinson advised that it
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260437A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260437A1.txt
  • types of non-geographic numbering resources as well: millions of numbers are used to provide toll-free services using non-geographic area codes such as 800, 888, 877 and 866. These numbering resources are managed separately; they are neither surveyed on FCC Form 502, nor is their utilization presented in this report. 14 For precise definitions of these categories, see 47 C.F.R. § 52.15. 15 This means that sometimes more than one carrier can report utilization data for the same thousands-block (or ten-thousands block). Carriers receiving numbers from another carrier are required to report utilization data for those numbers on a different page (of FCC Form 502) than the page that carriers use to report numbers received directly from the NANPA. Not all carriers
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260891A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260891A2.pdf
  • requires SBCIS to file any requests for numbers with the Commission and the relevant state commission at least thirty days prior to requesting numbers from the NANPA or the PA. ¶4 SBCIS will be responsible for processing port requests directly rather than going through a LEC. ¶9 The FCC imposed on SBCIS the "facilities readiness" requirement set forth in section 52.15(g)(2)(ii). If SBCIS is unable to provide a copy of an interconnection agreement approved by a state commission, it is required that it submit evidence that it has ordered an interconnection service pursuant to a tariff that is generally available to other providers of IP-enabled voice services. The tariff must be in effect, and the service ordered, before SBCIS submits an
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265170A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265170A1.txt
  • 2005) appears to have garnered usable information on over 97% of the numbering resources assigned to carriers in the United States. Although the reporting level is high, many carriers still had not provided usable utilization data by October 4, 2005, the cut- off date for inclusion in this report. 14 For precise definitions of these categories, see 47 C.F.R. § 52.15. 15 This means that sometimes more than one carrier can report utilization data for the same thousands-block (or ten-thousands block). Carriers receiving numbers from another carrier are required to report utilization data for those numbers on a different page (of FCC Form 502) than the page that carriers use to report numbers received directly from the NANPA. Not all carriers
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278703A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278703A1.pdf
  • that the IMG or I can provide to you or your staff to help move this matter forward, please contact me or one of the Co-Chairs of the pANI IMG: Hoke Knox (913) 315-9060 or Karen Mulberry (972) 729-7914. Sincerely, Bob Atkinson Robert C. Atkinson NANC Chair cc: Cheryl Callahan James Bachtell Sanford Williams FCC 01-362, 47 C.F. R. § 52.15 (g)(4). FCC 00-104, 47 C.F.R. § 52.15 (g) (1). � É × k l � ` › œ � Ÿ ¡ ¨ ª ¹ º Ç È É × 1× (R) × 7 ; ¦ " º ¾ ¿ Ä
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279929A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279929A1.txt
  • as 500 numbers and 900 numbers (which are described later in this report). Carriers use other types of non-geographic numbering resources as well: millions of numbers are used to provide toll-free services using non-geographic area codes such as 800, 888, 877 and 866. These numbering resources are managed separately. 14 For precise definitions of these categories, see 47 C.F.R. § 52.15. 15 This means that sometimes more than one carrier can report utilization data for the same thousands-block (or ten-thousands block). Carriers receiving numbers from another carrier are required to report utilization data for those numbers on a different page (of FCC Form 502) than the page that carriers use to report numbers received directly from the NANPA. Not all carriers
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281847A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281847A1.pdf
  • ESRKs The term `` 9-1-1 Governing Authority'' means ``an entity designated under state law or regulation to have decision-making and oversight responsibilities for a 9-1-1 Emergency Number System for one or more PSAPs.'' Generally speaking, an E9-1-1 SSP is in the majority of cases an ILEC but there are other entities that perform that function. 47C.F.R. § 52.7(c) 47C.F.R. § 52.15(a) 47C.F.R. § 52.15(d) FCC 01-362, 47 C.F. R. § 52.15 (g)(4). FCC 00-104, 47 C.F.R. § 52.15 (g) (1). ESQK applicants can obtain a current copy of the pANI Interim Assignment Guidelines for ESQK at the following website: http://www.atis.org/inc/docs/finaldocs/ESQK-Interim-Assignment-Guideline s-Final-Document.doc FCC 01-362, 47 C.F.R. § 52.15 (g)(4). ‚ Þ - : ; < = ? @ _ ` a {
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284926A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284926A1.txt
  • as 500 numbers and 900 numbers (which are described later in this report). Carriers use other types of non-geographic numbering resources as well: millions of numbers are used to provide toll-free services using non-geographic area codes such as 800, 888, 877 and 866. These numbering resources are managed separately. 14 For precise definitions of these categories, see 47 C.F.R. § 52.15. 15 This means that sometimes more than one carrier can report utilization data for the same thousands-block (or ten-thousands block). Carriers receiving numbers from another carrier are required to report utilization data for those numbers on a different page (of FCC Form 502) than the page that carriers use to report numbers received directly from the NANPA. Not all carriers
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • 52.42 45.51 Washington Everett 39.98 39.98 39.9839.98 39.9841.3742.31 43.98 44.05 43.83 46.55 46.47 48.34 Washington Seattle 37.03 37.03 37.0337.19 36.4736.4737.42 40.82 40.92 40.18 40.14 39.89 40.12 West Virginia Huntington 73.39 73.39 75.0573.03 72.0272.0267.31 60.60 60.90 65.32 65.91 65.83 65.96 Wisconsin Milwaukee 37.48 37.48 37.5139.69 39.6940.8041.15 41.04 40.84 41.94 52.17 56.28 63.24 Wisconsin Racine 39.40 39.12 39.1639.53 39.5240.6340.97 41.91 40.82 41.92 52.15 56.26 63.22 1Rates are based upon flat-rate service where available and measured/message service with 200 five-minute, same-zone, business day calls. 2Revised. 3Subject to revision. State (As of October 15, 2007) State City 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 22007 3 Alabama Huntsville $73.62 $73.62 $69.00 $69.00 $69.00 $69.00 $69.00 $69.00 $69.00 $69.00 $69.00 $69.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289173A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289173A1.txt
  • as 500 numbers and 900 numbers (which are described later in this report). Carriers use other types of non-geographic numbering resources as well: millions of numbers are used to provide toll-free services using non-geographic area codes such as 800, 888, 877 and 866. These numbering resources are managed separately. 14 For precise definitions of these categories, see 47 C.F.R. § 52.15. 15 This means that sometimes more than one carrier can report utilization data for the same thousands-block (or ten-thousands block). Carriers receiving numbers from another carrier are required to report utilization data for those numbers on a different page (of FCC Form 502) than the page that carriers use to report numbers received directly from the NANPA. Not all carriers
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292556A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292556A1.txt
  • MHz 202KG7D DIGITAL VOICE AUDIO AND DATA 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 404KG7D DIGITAL VOICE AUDIO AND DATA 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 808KG7D DIGITAL VOICE AUDIO AND DATA 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 153KG7D DIGITAL VOICE AUDIO AND DATA 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 614KG7D DIGITAL OUTROUTE DATA DIG AUDIO/VOICE 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 1M29G7D ANDREW Hub 5.6M 5.6 meters ANTENNA ID: 5.60M 52.15 dBW ANALOG NBFM 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 30K0F8E 69.60 dBW ANALOG SCPC 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 360KF8E 67.67 dBW DIG 2.9 CLI VIDEO & DIG AUDIO/DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 1M20G7D 67.78 dBW DIG OUTROUTE DATA DIG AUDIO/VOICE 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 1M23G7D 71.62 dBW DIG 6.6 CLI VIDEO & DIG AUDIO/DATA 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 2M98G7D 74.20 dBW ANALOG
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293258A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293258A2.txt
  • from the 137,893 NXXs from the previous filing (data for June 30, 2008). As the NANPA calculates that about 142,284 NXXs have been assigned to United States carriers,16 this round of submissions (data for December 31, 2008) appears to have garnered usable information on 98.5% of the numbering resources 14 For precise definitions of these categories, see 47 C.F.R. § 52.15. 15 This means that sometimes more than one carrier can report utilization data for the same thousands-block (or ten-thousands block). Carriers receiving numbers from another carrier are required to report utilization data for those numbers on a different page (of FCC Form 502) than the page that carriers use to report numbers received directly from the NANPA. Not all carriers
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296480A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296480A1.txt
  • from the 140,189 NXXs from the previous filing (data for December 31, 2008). As the NANPA calculates that about 143,000 NXXs have been assigned to United States carriers,16 this round of submissions (data for June 30, 2009) appears to have garnered usable information on 98% of the numbering resources 14 For precise definitions of these categories, see 47 C.F.R. § 52.15. 15 This means that sometimes more than one carrier can report utilization data for the same thousands-block (or ten-thousands block). Carriers receiving numbers from another carrier are required to report utilization data for those numbers on a different page (of FCC Form 502) than the page that carriers use to report numbers received directly from the NANPA. Not all carriers
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303900A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303900A1.txt
  • as 500 numbers and 900 numbers (which are described later in this report). Carriers use other types of non-geographic numbering resources as well: millions of numbers are used to provide toll-free services using non-geographic area codes such as 800, 888, 877 and 866. These numbering resources are managed separately. 14 For precise definitions of these categories, see 47 C.F.R. § 52.15. 15 This means that sometimes more than one carrier can report utilization data for the same thousands-block (or ten-thousands block). Carriers receiving numbers from another carrier are required to report utilization data for those numbers on a different page (of FCC Form 502) than the page that carriers use to report numbers received directly from the NANPA. Not all carriers
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-104A1.pdf
  • administering a thousands-block number pool. (h) Contamination. Contamination occurs when at least one telephone number within a block of telephone numbers is not available for assignment to end users or customers. For purposes of this provision, a telephone number is "not available for assignment" if it is classified as administrative, aging, assigned, intermediate, or reserved as defined in new § 52.15(f)(1) of this part. (i) Donation. The term "donation" refers to the process by which carriers are required to contribute telephone numbers to a thousands-block number pool. (j) Inventory. The term "inventory" refers to all telephone numbers distributed, assigned or allocated: (1) To a service provider; or (2) To a pooling administrator for the purpose of establishing or maintaining a thousands-block
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-429A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-429A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-429A1.txt
  • ORDERED that pursuant to Sections 1, 3, 4, 201-205, 251 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 153, 154, 201-205, and 251, this SECOND REPORT AND ORDER is hereby ADOPTED and Part 52 of the Commission's rules ARE AMENDED AND ADOPTED as set forth in the attached Appendix A. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that section 52.15(f)(1)(vi) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(1)(vi), is effective upon the date of release of this SECOND REPORT AND ORDER. Section 52.15(h) is effective three months from the date of publication in the Federal Register. All other amendments to sections 52.15 through 52.20 of the Commission's rules as set forth in Appendix A are effective thirty days from the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-362A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-362A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-362A1.txt
  • as follows: AUTHORITY: Sections 1, 2, 4, 5, 48 Stat. 1066, as amended; 47 U.S.C. § 151, 152, 154, 155 unless otherwise noted. Interpret or apply secs. 3, 4, 201-05, 207-09, 218, 225-7, 251-2, 271 and 332, 48 Stat. 1070, as amended, 1077; 47 U.S.C. 153, 154, 201-205, 207-09, 218, 225-7, 251-2, 271 and 332 unless otherwise noted. 2. Section 52.15 is revised to read as follows: § 52.15 Central office code administration. *** (g) Applications for Numbering Resources. *** Growth Numbering resources. *** (iv) (deleted) (4) Non-Compliance. The NANPA shall withhold numbering resources from any U.S. carrier that fails to comply with the reporting and numbering resource application requirements established in this part. The NANPA shall not issue numbering resources
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.txt
  • continues to read: Authority: Sec. 1, 2, 4, 5, 48 Stat. 1066, as amended; 47 U.S.C. §151, 152, 154, 155 unless otherwise noted. Interpret or apply secs. 3, 4, 201-05, 207-09, 218, 225-7, 251,2, 271 and 332, 48 Stat. 1070, as amended, 1077; 47 U.S.C. 153, 154, 201-05, 207-09, 218, 225, 251-2, 271 and 332 unless otherwise noted. 79. Section 52.15 is amended by revising paragraphs (f)(6)(iii) and (i)(7) to read as follows: § 52.15 Central office code administration. * * * * * (6)(iii) A state commission seeking to reduce the reporting frequency pursuant to paragraph (f)(6)(ii) of this section shall notify the Wireline Competition Bureau and the NANPA in writing prior to reducing the reporting frequency. (7) If a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-329A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-329A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-329A1.txt
  • such a plan might work, and note potential advantages and disadvantages. Further, we seek comment on whether a methodology basing assessments on telephone numbers would be easier for the Administrator to implement and audit than other connection-based proposals in the record. We also seek comment regarding the process for contributors to report telephone numbers under a telephone number-based methodology. Section 52.15(f)(6) of our current rules requires telecommunications carriers that receive numbering resources to file forecast and utilization reports twice per year. These reports include the number of assigned telephone numbers. This proposal therefore could rely upon existing reporting requirements. We seek comment on whether this semi-annual reporting requirement would be sufficient for universal service purposes. For example, would these reports adequately
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-140A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-140A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-140A1.txt
  • Marlene H. Dortch Secretary See The Cellular Telecommunications and Internet Association's Petition for Forbearance from Further Increases in the Numbering Resource Utilization Threshold, CC Docket No. 99-100, filed June 28, 2002 (Petition). The numbering resources utilization threshold requires carriers to use a specified percentage of numbers in their existing inventory before they can receive additional numbering resources. 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(h). Comments opposing CTIA's Petition were filed by the California Public Utilities Commission and the People of the State of California (California Commission), the Michigan Public Service Commission (Michigan Commission), the New York State Department of Public Service (New York Department) and the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (Pennsylvania Commission). See 47 U.S.C. § 160. The 1996 Act amended the Communications Act
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-337A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-337A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-337A1.txt
  • role of the Commission in directing policy on and accommodating current and future numbering needs. We further propose to delete references to the Central Office Code Utilization Survey (COCUS), which is no longer used by the NANPA to collect number utilization and forecast information from carriers. We seek comment on these proposals. We also propose to repeal portions of section 52.15 of the Commission's rules. Paragraph (c) sets forth regulations for telecommunications carriers that perform central office code administration. All such administration is currently performed by the NANPA, so these provisions are no longer applicable. Similarly, paragraphs (d) and (e) address CO code administration functional requirements, and describe procedures for the initial transfer of numbering administration functions from Bellcore and certain
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-146A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-146A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-146A1.txt
  • under an agreement such as a contract or tariff at the request of specific end users or customers for their use, or numbers not yet working but having a customer service order pending. Numbers that are not yet working and have a service order pending for more than five days shall not be classified as assigned numbers.'' 47 CFR § 52.15(f)(iii). For most entities, this submission was due February 1, 2004. Cingular Comments at 3-4. Id. at 4-5. Cingular states that in two populous California codes (310 and 909), the ``contamination threshold'' has been increased to 25%, so that, in each thousand block a carrier receives, up to 250 numbers already may be retained. Federal Communications Commission, Regulatory Fees Fact Sheet,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-188A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-188A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-188A1.txt
  • that meet the following criteria: The outage duration must be at least 30 minutes; and The number of ``user-minutes'' potentially affected must equal or exceed 900,000. For telephony, we proposed to define the number of end users as the number of ``assigned telephone numbers,'' by which we mean the sum of ``assigned numbers'' and ``administrative numbers'' as defined in Section 52.15(f)(i) and (iii) of the Commission's Rules. Assigned numbers are defined as ``numbers working in the Public Switched Telephone Network ("PSTN") under an agreement such as a contract or tariff at the request of specific end users or customers for their use, or numbers not yet working but having a customer service order pending.'' Administrative numbers are ``numbers used by telecommunications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-30A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-30A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-30A1.txt
  • that meet the following criteria: The outage duration must be at least 30 minutes; and The number of ``user-minutes'' potentially affected must equal or exceed 900,000. For telephony, we propose to define the number of end users as the number of ``assigned telephone numbers,'' by which we mean the sum of ``assigned numbers'' and ``administrative numbers'' as defined in Section 52.15(f)(i) and (iii) of the Commission's Rules. Assigned numbers are defined as ``numbers working in the Public Switched Telephone Network ("PSTN") under an agreement such as a contract or tariff at the request of specific end users or customers for their use, or numbers not yet working but having a customer service order pending.'' Administrative numbers are ``numbers used by telecommunications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-161A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-161A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-161A1.txt
  • Declaration for the state of Florida on August 28th, 2005. We do not extend the relief granted in this order to carriers operating in the state of Florida, because the telecommunications infrastructure in Florida apparently was not subject to the same level of destruction as was the infrastructure in parts of Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 52.15 et seq. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 52.23, 52.31. See Telephone Number Portability, CC Docket No. 95-116, First Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 11 FCC Rcd 8352, 8447, para. 181 (1996). See also Telephone Number Portability, CC Docket No. 95-116, Memorandum Opinion and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 23697, 23706, para. 22
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-164A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-164A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-164A1.txt
  • and Alabama and mass evacuation of the affected areas. In our continuing efforts to assist the telecommunications industry as it restores service in Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama in the wake of Hurricane Katrina, we grant, on our own motion, a temporary waiver of the Commission's rule for aging residential numbers for customers in the affected areas as described below. Section 52.15(f)(ii) of the Commission's numbering rules allows carriers to age numbers previously assigned to residential customers for no more than 90 days before making them available for assignment to another customer. Waiver of this rule will allow carriers to disconnect temporarily customers' telephone service, upon request, to avoid billing issues, and reinstate the same number when the service is reconnected for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-20A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-20A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-20A1.txt
  • 20554 In the Matter of Administration of the North American Numbering Plan ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CC Docket 99-200 ORDER Adopted: January 28, 2005 Released: February 1, 2005 By the Commission: Commissioners Abernathy, Copps, and Adelstein concurring and issuing separate statements. Introduction In this order, we grant SBC Internet Services, Inc. (SBCIS) a waiver of section 52.15(g)(2)(i) of the Commission's rules. Specifically, subject to the conditions set forth in this order, we grant SBCIS permission to obtain numbering resources directly from the North American Numbering Plan Administrator (NANPA) and/or the Pooling Administrator (PA) for use in deploying IP-enabled services, including Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) services, on a commercial basis to residential and business customers. We also
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-86A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-86A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-86A1.txt
  • 52.5 to include American Samoa. No parties oppose our proposal to update section 52.5 with this modification. We therefore modify section 52.5 as set forth in Appendix B. In addition, we update section 52.17(b) by changing the reference to ``Common Carrier Bureau'' to ``Wireline Competition Bureau'' as set forth in Appendix B. Subpart B - Administration. Sections 52.11, 52.13, and 52.15 involve the administration of telecommunications numbers for the provision of telecommunications services. In particular, section 52.11 provides the duties of the North American Numbering Council; section 52.13 governs the duties of the North American Numbering Plan Administrator; and section 52.15 describes central office code administration. The Commission proposed the repeal of sections 52.11(d), 52.15(b)(3), 52.15(c) through (e) and modification of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-188A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-188A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-188A1.txt
  • we must address both the obligations of interconnected VoIP providers as well as the obligations of telecommunications carriers that serve interconnected VoIP providers as their numbering partners. Thus, we take this opportunity to reaffirm that only carriers, absent a Commission waiver, may access numbering resources directly from the North American Numbering Plan Administrator (NANPA) or the Pooling Administrator (PA). Section 52.15(g)(2) of the Commission's rules limits access to the NANP numbering resources to those applicants that are (1) ``authorized to provide service in the area for which the numbering resources are being requested''; and (2) ``[are] or will be capable of providing service within sixty (60) days of the numbering resources activation date.'' It is well established that our rules allow
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-151A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-151A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-151A1.txt
  • how Internet-based TRS providers are to obtain access to numbering resources. The record reflects three methods: (1) directly from the NANPA or the PA, (2) from a neutral third-party administrator established for the purpose, or (3) from numbering partners through commercial agreements. Only carriers, absent a Commission waiver, may obtain numbering resources directly from the NANPA or the PA. Section 52.15(g)(2) of the Commission's rules limits access to the NANP numbering resources to those applicants that are (1) ``authorized to provide service in the area for which the numbering resources are being requested'' and (2) ``[are] or will be capable of providing service within sixty (60) days of the numbering resources activation date.'' Allowing only carriers to have direct access to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-249A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-249A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-249A1.txt
  • and responding to all citizen-activated emergency communications''). NET 911 Act § 101(2); Wireless 911 Act § 6(e)(1). We decline to expand the applicability of the rights granted in the NET 911 Act to entities beyond those encompassed within that statute as some commenters have suggested. In this Order, therefore, we do not address whether we should modify or waive section 52.15(g)(2)(i) of the Commission's rules to allow VPC providers that are neither carriers nor interconnected VoIP providers to obtain numbering resources. See TCS Comments at 4 (requesting that the Commission address issues raised in a TCS petition for waiver that is pending in CC Docket No. 99-200). Our determination that such providers are not granted access rights under the NET 911
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-262A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-262A1.txt
  • The Commission has addressed certain reporting based on telephone numbers in other contexts. In the number utilization context, the Commission requires that each telecommunications carrier that receives numbering resources from the North American Numbering Plan Administrator (NANPA), the Pooling Administrator, or another telecommunications carrier report its numbering resources in each of six defined categories of numbers set forth in section 52.15(f) of our rules. In the regulatory fee context, the Commission used the category of ``assigned numbers'' as the starting point for determining how to assess fees on certain providers, but found it necessary to modify that definition to account for the different regulatory contexts. Specifically, in assessing regulatory fees for commercial mobile radio service (CMRS) providers that report number utilization
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-46A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-46A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-46A1.txt
  • contributions methodology. In other contexts, the Commission has defined ``numbers'' for purposes of Commission reporting requirements. For example, the Commission requires that each telecommunications carrier that receives numbering resources from the North American Numbering Plan Administrator (NANPA), the Pooling Administrator, or another telecommunications carrier, report its numbering resources in each of six defined categories of numbers set forth in section 52.15(f) of our rules. In the regulatory fee context, the Commission has adopted the category of ``assigned numbers'' as the starting point for determining how to assess fees on certain providers, but found it necessary to modify that definition to account for different regulatory contexts. Specifically, in assessing regulatory fees for commercial mobile radio service (CMRS) providers that report number utilization
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99122.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99122.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99122.wp
  • Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-122 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 105 CO Code Guidelines at § 6.4. 106 Id. at § 9.4. 107 Our rules require the NANPA to monitor the use of NXX codes within each NPA, forecast the date by which all NXX codes within that NPA will be assigned, and plan and initiate area code relief. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 52.13, 52.15, and 52.19. 108 But see PageNet comments at 19 (arguing that there is no need to collect more information). 109 The 1999 COCUS requested carriers to provide aggregate NPA-wide number utilization data. 31 demand for numbers has rapidly increased. The current data reporting mechanisms were designed when the local exchange market was largely a monopoly; in that period, the industry
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98271.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98271.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98271.wp
  • specifically at the circumstances and business Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-271 815 Local Competition Second Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 19542. In implementing section 251(b)(3), the Commission required an incumbent LEC to comply with the following rules: (1) it must charge one uniform fee to all carriers, including itself, for the assignment of CO codes, 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(c)(1); (2) it must not assess unjust, discriminatory, or unreasonable charges for activating CO codes on any carrier or group of carriers, Local Competition Second Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 19538; and (3) it must apply identical standards and procedures for processing all numbering requests, regardless of the party making the request. 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(c)(2). 816 47 U.S.C.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/News_Releases/nr22car.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/News_Releases/nr22car.html
  • The Chief, Enforcement Bureau, acting pursuant to delegated authority, today issued Notices of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NALs'') to 22 carriers for failing to file mandatory reports as to their actual and forecast number usage. The fines issued pursuant to these NALs are for amounts ranging between $6,000 and $12,000 based on the numbering resources assigned to each carrier. Section 52.15(f) of the Commission's rules requires U.S. carriers receiving numbering resources from the North American Numbering Plan Administrator (``NANPA''), a Pooling Administrator, or another telecommunications carrier, to file NRUF reports semi-annually. The reporting requirements were adopted to facilitate the monitoring of numbering resource usage and to promote more efficient use of numbering resources and forestall premature exhaustion of numbering resources. Each
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011000.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011000.html
  • In the Matter of LITELCO COMMUNICATIONS, INC. OCN# 6873 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017i NAL/Acct. No. 200132080040 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Litelco Communications, Inc. (``Litelco'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that Litelco is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the North
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011001.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011001.html
  • D.C. 20554 In the Matter of NECLEC, LLC OCN# 4580 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017j NAL/Acct. No. 200132080041 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Neclec, LLC (``Neclec'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that Neclec is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the North
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011002.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011002.html
  • CORPORATION OCN #s: 2640, 2839, 3258, 2539, 3490, 2659, 2641 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017k NAL/Acct. No. 200132080042 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Net-Tel Corporation (``Net-Tel'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that Net-Tel is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the North
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011003.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011003.html
  • INC. OCN#s: 2580, 2579, 4177, 4179, 4178, 4176 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017l NAL /Acct. No. 200132080043 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Network Plus, Inc. (``NPI'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that NPI is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the North
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011004.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011004.html
  • of NORTH AMERICAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION OCN # 8770 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017m NAL/Acct. No. 200132080044 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that North American Telecommunications Corporation (``NATC'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that NATC is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the North
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011005.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011005.html
  • COUNTY COMMUNICATIONS CORP. OCN#s: 7894, 8293, 8294 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017n NAL/Acct. No. 2001320080045 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that North County Communications Corp. (``North County'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that North County is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the North
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011006.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011006.html
  • TEXAS TELECOM, INC. OCN#s: 4743, 4744, 4797, 7758 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017o NAL/Acct. No. 200132080046 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Optel Texas Telecom, Inc. (``Optel'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that Optel is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $9,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the North
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011007.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011007.html
  • SOURCE USA, LLC OCN#s: 4781, 4998, 4999 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017p NAL/Acct. No. 200132080047 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Paging Source USA, LLC (``Paging Source'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that Paging Source is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011008.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011008.html
  • DISTRIBUTORS, INC. OCN# 6841 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017q NAL/Acct. No. 200132080048 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that R and G Distributors, Inc. (``R and G Distributors'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that R and G Distributors is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011009.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011009.html
  • INC. OCN#s: 2507, 2621, 2508, 2510, 2620, 2506, 3799 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017r NAL/Acct. No. 200132080049 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Trivergent Communications, Inc. (``Trivergent'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that Trivergent is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the North
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011010.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011010.html
  • MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS, INC. II OCN# 6543 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017s NAL/Acct. No. 200132080050 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that USA Mobile Communications, Inc. II (``USA Mobile'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that USA Mobile is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $12,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011011.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011011.html
  • of VANGUARD CELLULAR SYSTEMS, INC. OCN#s: 6383, 6384 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017t NAL/Acct. No. 200132080051 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Vanguard Cellular Systems, Inc. (``Vanguard'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that Vanguard is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $9,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the North
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011012.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011012.html
  • In the Matter of WINSOME PAGING, INC. OCN# 6918 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017u NAL/Acct. No. 200132080052 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Winsome Paging, Inc. (``Winsome'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that Winsome is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the North
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01991.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01991.html
  • D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ALLPAGE, INC. OCN# 4276 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017 NAL/Acct. No. 200132080031 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Allpage, Inc. (``Allpage'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that Allpage is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the North
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01992.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01992.html
  • of AMERICAN METROCOMM CORP. OCN#s: 8467, 8680, 8675 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017a NAL/Acct. No. 200132080032 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that American Metrocomm Corp. (``American Metrocomm'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that American Metrocomm is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01993.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01993.html
  • of ATX TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, LTD. OCN#s: 7757, 7061 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017b NAL/Acct. No. 200132080033 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that ATX Telecommunications Services, Ltd. (``ATX'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that ATX is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $ 9,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (the ``Act'') grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01994.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01994.html
  • In the Matter of CDS NETWORKS, INC. OCN# 4282 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017c NAL/Acct. No. 200132080034 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that CDS Networks, Inc. (``CDS'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that CDS is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the North
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01995.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01995.html
  • In the Matter of CHICKASAW TELEPHONE CO. OCN# 1980 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017d NAL/Acct. No. 200132080035 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Chickasaw Telephone Co. (``Chickasaw'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that Chickasaw is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the North
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01996.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01996.html
  • In the Matter of CORE COMMUNICATIONS, INC. OCN# 2593 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017e NAL/Acct. No. 200132080036 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Core Communications, Inc. (``Core'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that Core is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the North
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01997.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01997.html
  • the Matter of DIGITAL TELEPORT, INC. OCN# 7102 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017f NAL/Acct. No. 200132080037 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Digital Teleport, Inc. (``Digital Teleport'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that Digital Teleport is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01998.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01998.html
  • D.C. 20554 In the Matter of FULLTEL, INC. OCN# 4589 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017g NAL/Acct. No. 200132080038 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Fulltel, Inc. (``Fulltel'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that Fulltel is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the North
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01999.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01999.html
  • In the Matter of IDS LONG DISTANCE OCN# 8368 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017h NAL/Acct. No. 200132080039 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that IDS Long Distance (``IDS'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that IDS is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the North
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-1073A1.html
  • the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 ) ) In the Matter of ) ) ALLPAGE ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017 OCN# 4276 ) NAL/Acct. No. 200132080031 ) FRN 0004-3752-26 ) ) FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: May 8, 2002 Released: May 10, 2002 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we find that Allpage (``Allpage'') violated 47 C.F.R. 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. We conclude that Allpage is liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND On April 24, 2001, the Chief, Enforcement Bureau, acting pursuant to delegated authority, issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') to Allpage, proposing a $6,000 forfeiture.1 We issued the NAL because
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-1078A1.html
  • ) LITELCO COMMUNICATIONS, INC. ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017i ) NAL/Acct. No. 200132080040 ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: May 8, 2002 Released: May 10, 2002 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Order, we cancel a monetary forfeiture in the amount of $6,000 proposed against Litelco Communications, Inc. (``Litelco'') for apparent willful violations of 47 C.F.R. 52.15(f), which requires certain carriers to report number utilization and forecast data. II. BACKGROUND On April 24, 2001, the Chief, Enforcement Bureau, acting pursuant to delegated authority, issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') to Litelco, proposing a $6,000 forfeiture.1 We issued the NAL because it appeared that Litelco had failed to report on its actual and forecast number
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-1079A1.html
  • Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Order, we deny NECLEC, LLC's (``NECLEC'') request for cancellation and refund of its payment of a $6,000 forfeiture proposed in our Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'').1 In the NAL, we determined that NECLEC willfully failed to report its number utilization and forecast data, which constituted an apparent violation of 47 C.F.R. 52.15(f). For the reasons set forth below, we conclude that NECLEC has not justified its request. II. BACKGROUND On April 24, 2001, the Chief, Enforcement Bureau, acting pursuant to delegated authority, issued the NAL to NECLEC, proposing a $6,000 forfeiture. We issued the NAL because it appeared that NECLEC had failed to report on its actual and forecast number usage by
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-1347A1.html
  • ) CDS NETWORKS, INC. ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017c OCN# 4282 ) NAL/Acct. No. 200132080038 ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: June 7, 2002 Released: June 11, 2002 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Order, we cancel a proposed forfeiture in the amount of $6,000 against CDS Networks, Inc., (``CDS'') for apparent violation of 47 C.F.R. 52.15(f), requiring reports of number utilization and forecast data. II. BACKGROUND On April 24, 2001, the Chief, Enforcement Bureau, acting pursuant to delegated authority, issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') to CDS, proposing a $6,000 forfeiture.1 We issued the NAL because it appeared that CDS had failed to report on its actual and forecast number usage by filing
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-1348A1.html
  • In the Matter of ) ) CHICKASAW TELEPHONE CO. ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017d OCN# 1980 ) NAL/Acct. No. 200132080035 ) FRN 0003-7326-09 ) ) FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: June 7, 2002 Released: June 11, 2002 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture against Chickasaw Telephone Co. (``Chickasaw'') for willful violation of 47 C.F.R. 52.15(f). The noted violation involves Chickasaw's failure to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances of this case, including Chickasaw's response to our Notice of Apparent Liability (``NAL'') ,1 we conclude that Chickasaw has justified a reduction of the proposed forfeiture and that it is liable for a forfeiture in the amount
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-1349A1.html
  • Matter of ) ) DIGITAL TELEPORT, INC. ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017f OCN# 7102 ) NAL/Acct. No. 200132080037 ) FRN 0005-6540-09 ) ) FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: June 7, 2002 Released: June 11, 2002 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture against Digital Teleport, Inc. (``Digital Teleport'') for willful violation of 47 C.F.R. 52.15(f). The noted violation involves Digital Teleport's failure to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances of this case, including Digital Teleport's response to our Notice of Apparent Liability (``NAL''),1 we conclude that Digital Teleport has justified a reduction of the proposed forfeiture and that it is liable for a forfeiture in
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-1350A1.html
  • Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 ) ) In the Matter of ) ) FULLTEL, INC. ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017g OCN# 4589 ) NAL/Acct. No. 200132080038 ) FRN 0006-7988-47 ) ) FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: June 7, 2002 Released: June 11, 2002 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Order, we find that Fulltel, Inc. (``FullTel'') violated 47 C.F.R. 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. We conclude that FullTel is liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND On April 24, 2001, the Chief, Enforcement Bureau, acting pursuant to delegated authority, issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') to FullTel, proposing a $6,000 forfeiture.1 We issued the NAL because
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-1351A1.html
  • In the Matter of ) ) IDS TELCOM, LLC ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017h OCN# 8368 ) NAL/Acct. No. 200132080039 ) FRN 0006-7988-13 ) ) FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: June 20, 2002 Released: June 21, 2002 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture to IDS Telcom, LLC (``IDS'') for willful violation of 47 C.F.R. 52.15(f). The noted violation involves IDS's failure to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances of this case, including IDS's response to our Notice of Apparent Liability (``NAL''),1 we conclude that IDS has justified a reduction of the proposed forfeiture and that it is liable for a forfeiture in the amount of
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-1352A1.html
  • Matter of ) ) R & G DISTRIBUTORS, INC. ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017q OCN# 6841 ) NAL/Acct. No. 200132080048 ) FRN 0003-2716-16 ) ) FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: June 7, 2002 Released: June 11, 2002 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture against R&G Distributors, Inc. (``R&G'') for willful violation of 47 C.F.R. 52.15(f). The noted violation involves R&G's failure to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances of this case, including R&G's response to our Notice of Apparent Liability (``NAL''),1 we conclude that R&G is liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND On April 24, 2001, the Chief, Enforcement Bureau,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-172A1.html
  • 2002 Released: January 23, 2002 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. By this Memorandum Opinion and Order we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau, and OpTel, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, OpTel (Texas) Telecom, Inc. We find that the Consent Decree provides for an appropriate resolution of the Bureau's investigation into OpTel's compliance with section 52.15(f) of the Commission's rules, which requires semi-annual reporting of number utilization and forecast data.1 2. OpTel (Texas) Telecom, Inc. is no longer a regulated provider of local and long-distance telephone services, because it discontinued such services during August of 2001. The Consent Decree provides, however, among other things, that if in the future OpTel provides local or long-distance telephone service
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-172A2.html
  • for protection pursuant to Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. On December 4, 2001, the court presiding over their bankruptcy cases confirmed a plan of reorganization. OpTel, Inc. and certain of its affiliates and subsidiaries, including OpTel (Texas) Telecom, Inc., have effected, or are in the process of effecting, their reorganization pursuant to such confirmed plan. 3. Section 52.15(f) of the Commission's rules requires U.S. carriers receiving numbering resources from the North American Numbering Plan Administrator (``NANPA''), a Pooling Administrator or another telecommunications carrier, to report semiannually on their actual and forecast number usage. These data are to be reported on FCC Form 502, the North American Numbering Plan Numbering Resource Utilization/Forecast (``NRUF'') Report. Carriers and their affiliates and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-235A1.html
  • AND ORDER Adopted: January 30, 2002 Released: February 1, 2002 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. By this Memorandum Opinion and Order we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau, and North County Communications Corp (``NCC''). We find that the Consent Decree provides for an appropriate resolution of the Bureau's investigation into NCC's compliance with section 52.15(f) of the Commission's rules, which requires semi-annual reporting of number utilization and forecast data.1 2. Among other things, the Consent Decree provides that NCC will implement a program to ensure its future compliance with the Act and the Commission's rules and policies. In addition, the Consent Decree provides that NCC will make a voluntary contribution to the United States Treasury
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-235A2.html
  • competitive local exchange carrier in California, Oregon, Washington and Arizona, providing telecommunications services to its customers. NCC competes directly in major local markets in these states with large incumbent local exchange carriers such as U.S. West for local service customers, as well as with interexchange carriers such as AT&T, Sprint and MCI for long distance telecommunications service customers. 3. Section 52.15(f) of the Commission's rules requires U.S. carriers receiving numbering resources from the North American Numbering Plan Administrator (``NANPA''), a Pooling Administrator or another telecommunications carrier, to report semiannually on their actual and forecast number usage. These data are to be reported on FCC Form 502, the North American Numbering Plan Numbering Resource Utilization/Forecast (``NRUF'') Report. Carriers and their affiliates and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-361A1.html
  • No. EB-01-IH-0017s II ) NAL/Acct. No. 200132080050 ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: February 5, 2003 Released: February 7, 2003 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we cancel a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'')1 that the Enforcement Bureau issued to USA Mobile Communications, Inc. II (``USA Mobile'') for apparent willful violation of 47 C.F.R. 52.15(f), which requires certain carriers to report number utilization and forecast data. We issued the NAL because it appeared that USA Mobile had failed to report on its actual and forecast number usage by filing FCC Form 502, the North American Numbering Plan Numbering Resource Utilization/Forecast (``NRUF'') Report that was due on September 15, 2000.2 Arch Wireless, Inc. (``Arch'') responded to
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-423A1.html
  • File No. EB-01-IH-0017b SERVICES, LTD. ) NAL/Acct. No. 200132080033 ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: February 12, 2003 Released: February 14, 2003 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we cancel a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'')1 that the Enforcement Bureau issued to ATX Telecommunications Services, Ltd. (``ATX'') for apparent willful violation of 47 C.F.R. 52.15(f), which requires certain carriers to report number utilization and forecast data. We issued the NAL because it appeared that ATX had failed to report on its actual and forecast number usage by filing FCC Form 502, the North American Numbering Plan Numbering Resource Utilization/Forecast (``NRUF'') Report that was due on September 15, 2000.2 ATX responded to the NAL and states
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-424A1.html
  • ) ) In the Matter of ) ) NORTH AMERICAN ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017m TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION ) NAL/Acct. No. 200132080044 OCN# 8770 ) FRN No. 0004375564 ) ) FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: February 12, 2003 Released: February 14, 2003 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we find that North American Telecommunications Corporation (``NATC'') violated 47 C.F.R. 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. We conclude that NATC is liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND On April 24, 2001, the Chief, Enforcement Bureau, acting pursuant to delegated authority, issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') to NATC, proposing a $6,000 forfeiture.1 We issued the NAL because
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-463A1.html
  • ) ) NET-TEL CORPORATION ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017k ) NAL/Acct. No. 200132080042 ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: February 19, 2003 Released: February 21, 2003 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Order, we cancel a monetary forfeiture in the amount of $6,000 proposed against Net-Tel Corporation (``Net-Tel'') for its apparent willful violation of 47 C.F.R. 52.15(f), which requires certain carriers to report number utilization and forecast data. II. BACKGROUND On April 24, 2001, the Chief, Enforcement Bureau, acting pursuant to delegated authority, issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') to Net-Tel, proposing a $6,000 forfeiture.1 We issued the NAL because it appeared that Net-Tel had failed to report on its actual and forecast number
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-579A1.html
  • the Matter of ) ) VANGUARD CELLULAR SYSTEMS, INC. ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017t ) NAL/Acct. No. 200132080051 ) FRN No. 0006798052 ) ) FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: February 26, 2003 Released: February 28, 2003 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture against Vanguard Cellular Systems, Inc. (``Vanguard'') for willful violation of 47 C.F.R. 52.15(f). The noted violation involves Vanguard's failure to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances of this case, including the response to our Notice of Apparent Liability (``NAL''),1 we conclude that a reduction of the proposed forfeiture is warranted and that Vanguard is liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $3,000.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-3906A1.html
  • Matter of ) File No. EB-04-IH-0271 ) AT&T Corp. ) Acct. No. 200532080021 ) Compliance with Rules ) FRN: 0005937974 Regarding ) Thousands-Block Number Pooling ORDER Adopted: December 21, 2004 Released: December 21, 2004 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt a Consent Decree terminating an investigation into possible violations by AT&T Corp. (``AT&T'') of sections 52.15 and 52.20(c) of the Commission's rules,1 with respect to thousands-block number pooling in certain rate centers.2 2. The Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and AT&T have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would terminate the Bureau's investigation. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. We have reviewed the terms of the Consent Decree
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-271A1.html
  • ) File No. EB-04-IH-0469 ) MCI, Inc. ) Account No. 200532080120 ) Compliance with Rules Regarding ) FRN No. 0010856284 Thousands-Block Number Pooling ) ) ORDER Adopted: February 2, 2005 Released: February 3, 2005 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt a Consent Decree terminating an investigation into possible violations by MCI, Inc. (``MCI'') of sections 52.15 and 52.20(c) of the Commission's rules,1 with respect to thousands-block number pooling in certain rate centers.2 2. The Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and MCI have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would terminate the Bureau's investigation. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. We have reviewed the terms of the Consent Decree
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-409A1.html
  • of. ) ) File No. EB-04-IH-0465 ) Comcast Corporation ) Acct. No. 200532080124 ) Compliance with Rules Regarding ) FRN: 0006329247 Thousands-block Number Pooling ) ORDER Adopted: February 14, 2005 Released: February 15, 2005 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt a Consent Decree terminating an investigation into possible violations by Comcast Corporation (``Comcast'') of sections 52.15 and 52.20(c) of the Commission's rules,1 with respect to thousands-block number pooling in certain rate centers.2 2. The Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Comcast have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would terminate the Bureau's investigation. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. We have reviewed the terms of the Consent Decree
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-2375A1.html
  • No. 201032080005 OCN# 5300 ) FRN No. 0005052808 Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ) ) ) NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE AND ORDER Adopted: November 10, 2009 Released: November 12, 2009 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Global NAPs California, Inc. ("Global NAPs"), apparently violated sections 52.15(k)(1) and 52.15(f) of the Commission's rules, and Commission orders, by willfully and repeatedly failing to submit to a Commission numbering audit, failing to maintain accurate number use data and submitting inaccurate North American Numbering Plan Numbering Resource Utilization/Forecast ("NRUF") reports, failing to submit its August 2009 NRUF report, and failing to respond on a timely and complete basis to a
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-1268A1.html
  • (Commission established $20,000 as the base forfeiture amount for a carrier's failure to file accurate revenue on FCC Form 497, proposing a $320,000 forfeiture for VCI's sixteen apparent violations); Global NAPs California, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 24 FCC Rcd 13545, 13554-56 P:P: 24-27 (Enf. Bur. 2009) (assessing $25,000 proposed forfeiture against a carrier for apparently violating Section 52.15(f) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S: 52.15(f), finding that filing of inaccurate reports undermines the Commission's ability to monitor and ensure the efficient allocation of telephone numbering resources) ("Global NAPs California, Inc."); Cardinal Broadband LLC, aka Sovereign Telecommunications, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 23 FCC Rcd 12233, 12235-37 P:P: 6-11 (Enf. Bur. 2008) (assessing a $25,000 forfeiture against an
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2155A1.html
  • Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (the "Bureau") and PageData LLC ("PageData") and WaveSent LLC ("WaveSent"). The Consent Decree terminates the enforcement proceedings initiated by the Bureau against PageData and WaveSent for possible violation of section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("the Act"), section 52.15(f) of the Commission's rules and Commission orders. 2. The Bureau and PageData and WaveSent have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find that the public interest
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99122.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99122.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99122.wp
  • Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-122 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 105 CO Code Guidelines at § 6.4. 106 Id. at § 9.4. 107 Our rules require the NANPA to monitor the use of NXX codes within each NPA, forecast the date by which all NXX codes within that NPA will be assigned, and plan and initiate area code relief. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 52.13, 52.15, and 52.19. 108 But see PageNet comments at 19 (arguing that there is no need to collect more information). 109 The 1999 COCUS requested carriers to provide aggregate NPA-wide number utilization data. 31 demand for numbers has rapidly increased. The current data reporting mechanisms were designed when the local exchange market was largely a monopoly; in that period, the industry
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98271.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98271.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98271.wp
  • specifically at the circumstances and business Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-271 815 Local Competition Second Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 19542. In implementing section 251(b)(3), the Commission required an incumbent LEC to comply with the following rules: (1) it must charge one uniform fee to all carriers, including itself, for the assignment of CO codes, 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(c)(1); (2) it must not assess unjust, discriminatory, or unreasonable charges for activating CO codes on any carrier or group of carriers, Local Competition Second Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 19538; and (3) it must apply identical standards and procedures for processing all numbering requests, regardless of the party making the request. 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(c)(2). 816 47 U.S.C.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/err00280.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/err00280.txt
  • in September 2000. In light of these considerations, we extend the deadline for compliance with the 45-day reservation period to December 31, 2000 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 10, 272, 303(r), 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 160, 272, and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, that the effectiveness of the provisions of 47 C.F.R. section 52.15(g) (iv) requiring the NANPA to withhold numbering resources from any U.S. carrier that fails to comply with the reporting requirements of that section ARE STAYED until August 31, 2000. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 10, 272, 303(r), 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 160, 272, and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, that the effectiveness of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00104.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00104.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00104.txt
  • for administering a thousands-block number pool. Contamination. Contamination occurs when at least one telephone number within a block of telephone numbers is not available for assignment to end users or customers. For purposes of this provision, a telephone number is ``not available for assignment'' if it is classified as administrative, aging, assigned, intermediate, or reserved as defined in new § 52.15(f)(1) of this part. Donation. The term ``donation'' refers to the process by which carriers are required to contribute telephone numbers to a thousands-block number pool. Inventory. The term ``inventory'' refers to all telephone numbers distributed, assigned or allocated: To a service provider; or To a pooling administrator for the purpose of establishing or maintaining a thousands-block number pool. 4. Section
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00280.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00280.txt
  • our current prohibition on extensions. In light of these considerations, we stay the effectiveness of the 45-day reservation period to December 1, 2000. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 10, 272, 303(r), 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 160, 272, and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, that the effectiveness of the provisions of 47 C.F.R. section 52.15(f)(6) requiring the filing of utilization and forecast data by August 1, 2000, and 52.15(g)(3) (iv) requiring the NANPA to withhold numbering resources from any U.S. carrier that fails to comply with the reporting requirements of that section ARE STAYED until September 15, 2000. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 10, 272, 303(r), 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 160, 272,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00333.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00333.txt
  • in September 2000. In light of these considerations, we extend the deadline for compliance with the 45-day reservation period to December 31, 2000 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 10, 272, 303(r), 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 160, 272, and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, that the effectiveness of the provisions of 47 C.F.R. section 52.15(g) (iv) requiring the NANPA to withhold numbering resources from any U.S. carrier that fails to comply with the reporting requirements of that section ARE STAYED until August 31, 2000. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 10, 272, 303(r), 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 160, 272, and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, that the effectiveness of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00429.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00429.txt
  • ORDERED that pursuant to Sections 1, 3, 4, 201-205, 251 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 153, 154, 201-205, and 251, this SECOND REPORT AND ORDER is hereby ADOPTED and Part 52 of the Commission's rules ARE AMENDED AND ADOPTED as set forth in the attached Appendix A. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that section 52.15(f)(1)(vi) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(1)(vi), is effective upon the date of release of this SECOND REPORT AND ORDER. Section 52.15(h) is effective three months from the date of publication in the Federal Register. All other amendments to sections 52.15 through 52.20 of the Commission's rules as set forth in Appendix A are effective thirty days from the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • 15) City 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Alabama Huntsville $61.61$62.49$62.74$61.58$60.55$56.15$53.46$50.90$48.40$45.97$46.91$47.62 Alaska Anchorage 21.99 21.99 29.16 33.33 31.04 31.05 31.05 31.08 31.12 31.11 31.1131.87 Arizona Tucson 33.90 40.65 40.72 40.72 40.72 41.73 41.71 42.00 42.00 42.01 42.6843.41 Arkansas Pine Bluff 42.77 42.92 43.10 42.93 41.10 40.91 41.05 41.13 41.13 41.39 42.5343.31 Arkansas West Memphis 52.15 56.05 56.19 55.52 53.30 53.70 53.85 53.03 53.80 54.14 55.0656.08 California Anaheim 27.81 28.88 29.24 29.10 29.10 30.43 30.65 30.25 30.28 28.34 27.2027.39 California Bakersfield 28.37 29.50 29.29 29.15 29.15 31.06 31.29 30.64 30.92 28.23 27.2027.97 California Fresno 29.11 30.33 30.11 29.97 29.97 31.06 31.29 31.10 30.92 28.11 27.7827.97 California Long Beach 35.16 38.10 38.39 38.39 36.92 43.95 43.84 40.67
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Alabama Huntsville $61.61$62.49$62.74$61.58$60.55$56.15$53.46$50.90$48.40$45.97$46.91$48.00$48.94 Alaska Anchorage 21.99 21.99 29.16 33.33 31.04 31.05 31.05 31.08 31.12 31.11 31.11 34.95 34.71 Arizona Tucson 33.90 40.65 40.72 40.72 40.72 41.73 41.71 42.00 42.00 42.01 42.68 43.65 44.31 Arkansas Pine Bluff 42.77 42.92 43.10 42.93 41.10 40.91 41.05 41.13 41.13 41.39 42.53 44.37 44.69 Arkansas West Memphis 52.15 56.05 56.19 55.52 53.30 53.70 53.85 53.03 53.80 54.14 55.06 57.10 57.43 California Anaheim 27.81 28.88 29.24 29.10 29.10 30.43 30.65 30.25 30.28 28.34 27.20 27.66 27.74 California Bakersfield 28.37 29.50 29.29 29.15 29.15 31.06 31.29 30.64 30.92 28.23 27.20 28.24 27.74 California Fresno 29.11 30.33 30.11 29.97 29.97 31.06 31.29 31.10 30.92 28.11 27.78 28.24 28.32 California Long Beach
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • Line * (as of October 15) State City 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 Alabama Huntsville $61.61 $62.49 $62.74 $61.58 $60.55 $56.15 $53.46 $50.90 Alaska Anchorage 21.99 21.99 29.16 33.33 31.04 31.05 31.05 31.05 Arizona Tucson 33.90 40.65 40.72 40.72 40.72 41.73 41.71 42.00 Arkansas Pine Bluff 42.77 42.92 43.10 42.93 41.10 40.91 41.05 41.12 Arkansas West Memphis 52.15 56.05 56.19 55.52 53.30 53.70 53.85 54.01 California Fresno 29.11 30.33 30.11 29.97 29.97 31.06 31.29 31.75 California Long Beach 35.16 38.10 38.39 38.39 36.92 43.95 43.84 43.84 California Los Angeles 30.58 31.76 31.52 31.38 31.38 33.36 33.60 34.02 California Oakland 29.34 30.75 30.52 30.67 30.67 32.63 32.86 33.29 California San Jose 29.20 30.32 30.10 29.96 29.96 31.90 32.13 32.56
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 15) State City 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 Alabama Huntsville $61.61 $62.49 $62.74 $61.58 $60.55 $56.15 $53.46 $50.90 $48.40 Alaska Anchorage 21.99 21.99 29.16 33.33 31.04 31.05 31.05 31.08 31.11 Arizona Tucson 33.90 40.65 40.72 40.72 40.72 41.73 41.71 42.00 42.02 Arkansas Pine Bluff 42.77 42.92 43.10 42.93 41.10 40.91 41.05 41.13 41.13 Arkansas West Memphis 52.15 56.05 56.19 55.52 53.30 53.70 53.85 53.03 53.03 California Fresno 29.11 30.33 30.11 29.97 29.97 31.06 31.29 31.10 30.11 California Long Beach 35.16 38.10 38.39 38.39 36.92 43.95 43.84 40.67 40.67 California Los Angeles 30.58 31.76 31.52 31.38 31.38 33.36 33.60 31.75 31.52 California Oakland 29.34 30.75 30.52 30.67 30.67 32.63 32.86 43.84 43.52 California San Jose 29.20 30.32 30.10
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/utilizationdec2001.pdf
  • U.S.C. § 153(37). 13 Carriers classified themselves in a variety of ways on their NRUF forms, but were aggregated into four categories for the purposes of this report. Also, carriers may provide multiple types of services, but must indicate only their primary line of business on FCC Form 502. 14 For precise definitions of these categories see 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f)(1). 4 required to report utilization data for those numbers, and to mark those numbers as having been received from other carriers.15 The vast majority of numbering resources reported were part of geographic area codes. That is, the numbers were part of area codes that are associated with specific regions of the United States. Carriers are also required to report utilization
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/utilizationdec2002.pdf
  • must indicate only their primary line of business on FCC Form 502. Thus, for example, there is some potential that some numbers are classified as cellular but are really used for paging. Only small carriers seem to do this, so the effects of this misclassification should be very minor. 13 For precise definitions of these categories, see 47 C.F.R. § 52.15. 5 required to report utilization data for those numbers, and to mark those numbers as having been received from other carriers.14 The vast majority of numbering resources reported were part of geographic area codes. That is, the numbers were part of area codes that are associated with specific regions of the United States or another country. For instance, area code
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/utilizationdec2003.pdf
  • June 30, 2003). As the NANPA calculates that about 130,000 NXXs have been assigned to United States carriers,15 this round of submissions (data for December 31, 2003) appears to have garnered usable information on over 96% of the numbering resources assigned to carriers in the United States. Although the 13 For precise definitions of these categories, see 47 C.F.R. § 52.15. 14 This means that sometimes more than one carrier can report utilization data for the same thousands-block (or ten-thousands block). Carriers receiving numbers from another carrier are required to report utilization data for those numbers on a different page (of FCC Form 502) than the page that carriers use to report numbers received directly from the NANPA. Not all carriers
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/utilizationjun2003.pdf
  • December 31, 2002). As the NANPA calculates that about 131,000 NXXs have been assigned to United States carriers,15 this round of submissions (data for June 30, 2003) appears to have garnered usable information on about 95% of the numbering resources assigned to carriers in the United States. Although the 13 For precise definitions of these categories, see 47 C.F.R. § 52.15. 14 This means that sometimes more than one carrier can report utilization data for the same thousands-block (or ten-thousands block). Carriers receiving numbers from another carrier are required to report utilization data for those numbers on a different page (of FCC Form 502) than the page that carriers use to report numbers received directly from the NANPA. Not all carriers
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/utilizationjun2004.pdf
  • types of non-geographic numbering resources as well: millions of numbers are used to provide toll-free services using non-geographic area codes such as 800, 888, 877 and 866. These numbering resources are managed separately; they are neither surveyed on FCC Form 502, nor is their utilization presented in this report. 14 For precise definitions of these categories, see 47 C.F.R. § 52.15. 15 This means that sometimes more than one carrier can report utilization data for the same thousands-block (or ten-thousands block). Carriers receiving numbers from another carrier are required to report utilization data for those numbers on a different page (of FCC Form 502) than the page that carriers use to report numbers received directly from the NANPA. Not all carriers
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-11.pdf
  • 57,091 98,028 63.18 Verizon - New England - Massachusetts MA (121,949) (142,897) 20,991 -17.21 Verizon - North - Michigan MI 78,055 52,304 25,729 32.96 SBC - Ameritech - Michigan MI 297,882 141,612 155,222 52.11 Qwest - Minnesota MN 165,723 57,970 107,717 65.00 BellSouth - Mississippi MS 270,415 220,722 50,103 18.53 SBC - Southwestern Bell - Missouri MO 218,508 103,454 113,962 52.15 Sprint - United Telephone Company of Missouri MO 69,588 42,260 27,329 39.27 Qwest - Montana MT 53,390 33,543 19,845 37.17 Aliant Telecommunications - Nebraska NE 51,272 41,508 7,952 15.51 Qwest - Nebraska NE 67,912 37,171 30,722 45.24 Sprint - Centel of Nevada NV 59,106 524 58,582 99.11 Verizon - Contel Nevada NV 5,469 1,283 4,186 76.54 SBC - Nevada Bell
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9126.pdf
  • dBW 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 30K0G8E ANALOG NBFM 51.45 dBW 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 360KF8E ANALOG SCPC 66.74 dBW 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 1M00G7D DIGITAL AUDIO MCPC 66.17 dBW 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 1M20G7D DIGITAL 2.9 CLI VIDEO & DIG AUDIO/DATA 66.97 dBW 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 5.60M ANDREW ANTENNA ID:5.6M 5.6 meters 30K0F8E ANALOG NBFM 52.15 dBW 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 360KF8E ANALOG SCPC 69.60 dBW 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 1M00G7D DIGITAL AUDIO MCPC 66.87 dBW 1400.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 1M20G7D DIG 2.9 CLI VIDEO & DIG AUDIO/DATA 70.10 dBW 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 1M23G7D DIG OUTROUTE DATA DIG AUDIO/VOICE 67.77 dBW 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 1M34G7D DIG 3.3 CLI VIDEO & DIG AUDIO/DATA 68.15 dBW
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9145.pdf
  • 87.00 dBW 13750.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 3M00G7W DIGITAL VIDEO & DATA 69.00 dBW 13750.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 64K0G7D DIGITAL DATA 50.30 dBW 13750.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 10950.0000 - 11200.0000 MHz 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz E990280 SES-LIC-19990621-01047 PIONEER TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE, INC. Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Application for Authority Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service LOCATION: 35 ° 51 ' 52.15 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 118 E. ROBERTS, KINGFISHER, KINGFISHER, OK 97 ° 55 ' 53.19 " W LONG. 62-18156-01 CHANNEL MASTER ANTENNA ID:1 1.8 meters Page 2 of 7 400KG1D SCPC DPSK 1/2 FEC 53.00 dBW 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 400KG1D 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz E990296 SES-LIC-19990702-01132 TSR WIRELESS LLC Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Application for
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2000/dd001229.html
  • Telephone Companies, Transmittal 132, Tariff F.C.C. No. 3. (Dkt No. 90-119). Action by: Deputy Chief, Competitive Pricing Division, Common Carrier Bureau. Adopted: 12/28/2000 by ORDER. (DA No. 00-2920). CCB [32]DA-00-2920A1.pdf [33]DA-00-2920A1.doc [34]DA-00-2920A1.txt NUMBERING RESOURCE OPTIMIZATION. Continued to develop, adopt and implement a number of strategies to ensure that the numbering resources of the NANP are used efficiently. Final rule; Section 52.15(h) is effective 05/08/2001. [NPRM; 66 FR 9535 (02/08/01); Comment: 04/09/01]. (Dkt No. 96-98, 99-200). Action by: the Commission. Comments Due: 02/14/2001. Reply Comments Due: 03/07/2001. Adopted: 12/07/2000 by R&O. (FCC No. 00-429). CCB. Contact Carmel Weathers [35]FCC-00-429A1.pdf [36]FCC-00-429A1.doc [37]FCC-00-429A1.txt PETITION FOR EXPEDITED WAIVER OF NORTH AMERICAN BILLING AND COLLECTION, INC.. Granted petition for waiver seeking waiver of the requirement that
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2001/dd010424.html
  • of $6,000 to Litelco Communications, Inc. for failing to report its number utilization and forcast data.. Action by: Chief, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 04/20/2001 by NAL. (DA No. 01-1000). ENF [84]DA-01-1000A1.pdf [85]DA-01-1000A1.doc [86]DA-01-1000A1.txt NETWORK PLUS, INC. Issued a notice of apparent liability for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000 to Network Plus, Inc. for its apparent wilful violation of section 52.15(f) by failing to report its number utilization and forecast data.. Action by: Chief, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 04/20/2001 by NAL. (DA No. 01-1003). ENF [87]DA-01-1003A1.pdf [88]DA-01-1003A1.doc [89]DA-01-1003A1.txt WINSOME PAGING, INC. Issued a notice of apparent liability for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000 to Winsome Paging, Inc. for its apparent wilful violation of section 52.15(f) by failing to report its
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2002/dd020201.html
  • for willfully violating Section 17.4(a) of the Commission's Rules for failing to register KYCX-FM's antenna structure. Action by: Chief, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 01/30/2002 by Forfeiture Order. (DA No. 02-230). EB [37]DA-02-230A1.doc [38]DA-02-230A1.pdf [39]DA-02-230A1.txt NORTH COUNTY COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION (NORTH COUNTY). Adopted Consent Decree between the Bureau and North County resolving the Bureau's investigation into North County's compliance with 47 C.F.R. Sec. 52.15(f), which requires reporting of number utilization and forecast data, and terminated the proceeding. Action by: Chief, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 01/30/2002 by MO&O. (DA No. 02-235). EB [40]DA-02-235A1.doc [41]DA-02-235A2.doc [42]DA-02-235A1.pdf [43]DA-02-235A2.pdf [44]DA-02-235A1.txt [45]DA-02-235A2.txt GREENVILLE AND COOPER, TEXAS. Amended the FM table of allotments for these communities. MM DocketNo. 00-63. Action by: Chief, Allocations Branch. Adopted: 01/23/2002 by R&O. (DA No. 02-243).
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2002/dd020510.html
  • sum of $6,000 for willfully violating the Commission's rules that require U.S. carriers to report actual and forecast number usage. Action by: Chief, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 05/08/2002 by Forfeiture Order. (DA No. 02-1074). EB [78]DA-02-1074A1.doc [79]DA-02-1074A1.pdf [80]DA-02-1074A1.txt LITELCO COMMUNICATIONS, INC.. Cancelled the monetary forfeiture in the amount of $6,000 proposed against Litelco for apparent willful violations of 47 C.F.R. Section 52.15(f), which requires certain carriers to report number utilization and forecast data. Action by: Chief, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 05/08/2002 by MO&O. (DA No. 02-1078). EB [81]DA-02-1078A1.doc [82]DA-02-1078A1.pdf [83]DA-02-1078A1.txt BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.. Suspended for 5 months and set for investigation BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., Tariff FCC No., Transmittal No. 629. Action by: Deputy Chief, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau. Adopted: 05/10/2002 by
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2002/dd020611.html
  • No. 02-1359). MB [8]DA-02-1359A1.doc [9]DA-02-1359A2.xls [10]DA-02-1359A1.pdf [11]DA-02-1359A2.pdf [12]DA-02-1359A1.txt [13]DA-02-1359A2.txt Released: 06/11/2002. TARIFF TRANSMITTAL PUBLIC REFERENCE LOG. WCB. Contact: Reference Information Center at (202) 418-0270 [14]DOC-223260A1.pdf [15]DOC-223260A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- FULLTEL, INC. Issued a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000 to Fulltel for wilfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data, in violation of 47 C.F.R. Sec 52.15(f). Action by: Chief, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 06/07/2002 by Forfeiture Order. (DA No. 02-1350). EB [16]DA-02-1350A1.doc [17]DA-02-1350A1.pdf [18]DA-02-1350A1.txt CDS NETWORKS, INC. Cancelled a proposed forfeiture in the amount of $6,000 against CDS, for apparent violation of 47 C.F.R. Section 52.15(f), requiring reports of number utilization and forecast data. Action by: Chief, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 06/07/2002 by MO&O. (DA No. 02-1347). EB
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2003/dd030228.html
  • [49]DA-03-593A1.txt AT&T CORPORATION. Resolved the complaints regarding unauthorized change of subscriber's telecommunications carrier. Action by: Deputy Chief, Consumer Information Network Division, Consumer Information Bureau. Adopted: 02/24/2003 by ORDER. (DA No. 03-589). CGB [50]DA-03-589A1.doc [51]DA-03-589A1.pdf [52]DA-03-589A1.txt VANGUARD CELLULAR SYSTEMS, INC. Issued a monetary forfeiture in the amount of $3,000 to Vanguard Cellular Systems, Inc. based on its willful violation of section 52.15(f) of the Commission's rules, which requires certain carriers to report number utilization and forecast data. Action by: Chief, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 02/26/2003 by Forfeiture Order. (DA No. 03-579). EB [53]DA-03-579A1.doc [54]DA-03-579A1.pdf [55]DA-03-579A1.txt APCC SERVICES, INC., DATA NET SYSTEMS, LLC, DAVEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC., JAROTH, INC. DBA PACIFIC TELEMANAGEMENT SERVICES, AND INTERA COMMUNICATIONS CORP. V. CCI COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Granted APCC Services, Inc.,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2004/dd040716.html
  • [26]DOC-249703A1.pdf [27]DOC-249703A1.txt Released: 07/16/2004. TARIFF TRANSMITTAL PUBLIC REFERENCE LOG. WCB. Contact: (202) 418-0270 [28]DOC-249730A1.pdf [29]DOC-249730A1.txt Released: 07/16/2004. NOTICE OF STREAMLINED DOMESTIC SECTION 214 APPLICATION GRANTED. (DA No. 04-2112). (Dkt No 04-222). WCB. Contact: Tracey Wilson at (202) 418-1394 or Julie Veach at (202) 418-1558 [30]DA-04-2112A1.doc [31]DA-04-2112A1.pdf [32]DA-04-2112A1.txt Released: 07/16/2004. COMMENT SOUGHT ON SBC IP COMMUNICATIONS, INC. PETITION LIMITED WAIVER SECTION 52.15(G)(2)(I) REGARDING ACCESS TO NUMBERING RESOURCES. (DA No. 04-2144). (Dkt No 99-200) Pleading Cycle Established. Comments Due: 08/16/2004. Reply Comments Due: 08/31/2004. WCB. Contact: Sanford Williams at (202) 418-7400, TTY: (202) 418-0484 [33]DA-04-2144A1.doc [34]DA-04-2144A1.pdf [35]DA-04-2144A1.txt Report No: CWS-04-50 Released: 07/16/2004. ANTENNA STRUCTURE REGISTRATION SERVICE INFORMATION. WTB [36]DOC-249634A1.pdf [37]DOC-249634A1.txt Report No: CWS-04-49 Released: 07/16/2004. ANTENNA STRUCTURE REGISTRATION SERVICE INFORMATION. WTB [38]DOC-249722A1.pdf [39]DOC-249722A1.txt
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2005/dd050202.html
  • OF ITS SUBSIDIARIES TO DISCONTINUE DOMESTIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES. (DA No. 05-275). (Dkt No 05-38). Comments Due: 02/15/2005. WCB. Contact: Carmell Weathers at (202) 418-2325, email: Carmell.Weathers@fcc.gov or Rodney McDonald at (202) 418-7513, Rodney.Mcdonald@fcc.gov, TTY: (202) 418-0484 [67]DA-05-275A1.doc [68]DA-05-275A1.pdf [69]DA-05-275A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- ADMINISTRATION OF THE NORTH AMERICAN NUMBERING PLAN. Granted SBC Internet Services, Inc. a waiver of section 52.15(g)(2)(i) of the Commission's rules. (Dkt No. 99-200). Action by: the Commission. Adopted: 01/28/2005 by ORDER. (FCC No. 05-20). WCB [70]FCC-05-20A1.doc [71]FCC-05-20A2.doc [72]FCC-05-20A3.doc [73]FCC-05-20A4.doc [74]FCC-05-20A1.pdf [75]FCC-05-20A2.pdf [76]FCC-05-20A3.pdf [77]FCC-05-20A4.pdf [78]FCC-05-20A1.txt [79]FCC-05-20A2.txt [80]FCC-05-20A3.txt [81]FCC-05-20A4.txt References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256492A1.doc 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256492A1.pdf 3. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256492A1.txt 4. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256493A1.doc 5. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256493A1.pdf 6. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256493A1.txt 7. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256474A1.pdf 8. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256474A1.txt 9. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256475A1.pdf 10. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256475A1.txt 11. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256471A1.pdf 12. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256471A1.txt 13. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-270A1.doc 14. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-270A1.pdf
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2005/dd050311.html
  • JoAnn Lucanik at (202) 418-0873, Charles Iseman at (202) 418-2444 or Jim Bird at (202) 418-7802 [100]DA-05-656A1.doc [101]DA-05-656A1.pdf [102]DA-05-656A1.txt Released: 03/11/2005. WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU SEEKS COMMENT ON RNK, INC. D/B/A RNK TELECOM, NUVIO CORPORATION, UNIPOINT ENHANCED SERVICES D/B/A POINTONE, DIALPAD COMMUNICATIONS, INC., VONAGE HOLDINGS CORPORATION, AND VOEX, INC. PETITIONS FOR LIMITED WAIVER. (DA No. 05-663). (Dkt No 99-200) OF SECTION 52.15(G)(2)(I) OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES REGARDING ACCESS TO NUMBERING RESOURCES, Pleading Cycle Established. Comments Due: 04/11/2005. Reply Comments Due: 04/26/2005. WCB. Contact: Sanford Williams at (202) 418-1508, email: Sanford.Williams@fcc.gov, TTY: (202) 418-0484 [103]DA-05-663A1.doc [104]DA-05-663A1.pdf [105]DA-05-663A1.txt Report No: CWS-05-31 Released: 03/11/2005. ANTENNA STRUCTURE REGISTRATION SERVICE INFORMATION. WTB [106]DOC-257323A1.pdf [107]DOC-257323A1.txt Released: 03/11/2005. WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU'S BROADBAND DIVISION GRANTS REQUESTS FOR WAIVER OF BRS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2005/dd050504.html
  • BUREAU SEEKS COMMENT ON PROPOSED REVISIONS TO FCC FORMS 472, 473, AND 474. (DA No. 05-1283). (Dkt No 02-6) Issued Erratum correcting Public Notice, DA 05-513, released March 1, 2005. WCB. Contact: Greg Lipscomb at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-8200 [30]DOC-258512A1.doc [31]DOC-258512A1.pdf [32]DOC-258512A1.txt Released: 05/04/2005. WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU SEEKS COMMENT ON QWEST COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION PETITION FOR LIMITED WAIVER OF SECTION 52.15(G)(2)(I) OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES REGARDING ACCESS TO NUMBERING RESOURCES. (DA No. 05-1288). (Dkt No 99-200) Pleading Cycle Established. Comments Due: 06/04/2005. Reply Comments Due: 06/20/2005. WCB. Contact: Mika Savir at (202) 418-0384, email: Mika.Savir@fcc.gov, TTY: (202) 418-0484 [33]DA-05-1288A1.doc [34]DA-05-1288A1.pdf [35]DA-05-1288A1.txt Released: 05/04/2005. WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU SEEKS COMMENT ON THE MISSOURI PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION AND MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION PETITIONS FOR
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2009/dd091113.html
  • [35]DOC-294631A1.pdf [36]DOC-294631A1.txt REMARKS OF COMMISSIONER MICHAEL J. COPPS, FCC FIELD HEARING ON BROADBAND & PUBLIC SAFETY, GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, WASHINGTON, DC. CMMR [37]DOC-294632A1.pdf [38]DOC-294632A1.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- GLOBAL NAPS CALIFORNIA, INC. OCN# 5300. Notified Global NAPs California, Inc., of its apparent liability for a forfeiture in the amount of $80,000 for willfully and repeatedly violating the sections 52.15(k)(1) and 52.15(f) of the Commission's rules, and Commission orders. Action by: Chief, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 11/10/2009 by NALF. (DA No. 09-2375). EB [39]DA-09-2375A1.doc [40]DA-09-2375A1.pdf [41]DA-09-2375A1.txt References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2418A1.doc 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2418A1.pdf 3. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2418A1.txt 4. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294638A1.pdf 5. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294638A1.txt 6. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294611A1.pdf 7. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294611A2.txt 8. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294634A1.doc 9. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294634A1.pdf 10. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294634A1.txt 11. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294610A1.pdf 12. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294610A2.txt 13. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2417A1.doc 14. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2417A1.pdf 15. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2417A1.txt 16. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294642A1.doc 17. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294642A1.pdf
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/News_Releases/nr22car.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/News_Releases/nr22car.html
  • The Chief, Enforcement Bureau, acting pursuant to delegated authority, today issued Notices of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NALs'') to 22 carriers for failing to file mandatory reports as to their actual and forecast number usage. The fines issued pursuant to these NALs are for amounts ranging between $6,000 and $12,000 based on the numbering resources assigned to each carrier. Section 52.15(f) of the Commission's rules requires U.S. carriers receiving numbering resources from the North American Numbering Plan Administrator (``NANPA''), a Pooling Administrator, or another telecommunications carrier, to file NRUF reports semi-annually. The reporting requirements were adopted to facilitate the monitoring of numbering resource usage and to promote more efficient use of numbering resources and forestall premature exhaustion of numbering resources. Each
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011000.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011000.html
  • In the Matter of LITELCO COMMUNICATIONS, INC. OCN# 6873 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017i NAL/Acct. No. 200132080040 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Litelco Communications, Inc. (``Litelco'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that Litelco is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the North
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011001.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011001.html
  • D.C. 20554 In the Matter of NECLEC, LLC OCN# 4580 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017j NAL/Acct. No. 200132080041 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Neclec, LLC (``Neclec'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that Neclec is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the North
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011002.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011002.html
  • CORPORATION OCN #s: 2640, 2839, 3258, 2539, 3490, 2659, 2641 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017k NAL/Acct. No. 200132080042 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Net-Tel Corporation (``Net-Tel'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that Net-Tel is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the North
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011003.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011003.html
  • INC. OCN#s: 2580, 2579, 4177, 4179, 4178, 4176 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017l NAL /Acct. No. 200132080043 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Network Plus, Inc. (``NPI'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that NPI is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the North
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011004.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011004.html
  • of NORTH AMERICAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION OCN # 8770 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017m NAL/Acct. No. 200132080044 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that North American Telecommunications Corporation (``NATC'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that NATC is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the North
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011005.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011005.html
  • COUNTY COMMUNICATIONS CORP. OCN#s: 7894, 8293, 8294 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017n NAL/Acct. No. 2001320080045 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that North County Communications Corp. (``North County'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that North County is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the North
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011006.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011006.html
  • TEXAS TELECOM, INC. OCN#s: 4743, 4744, 4797, 7758 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017o NAL/Acct. No. 200132080046 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Optel Texas Telecom, Inc. (``Optel'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that Optel is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $9,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the North
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011007.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011007.html
  • SOURCE USA, LLC OCN#s: 4781, 4998, 4999 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017p NAL/Acct. No. 200132080047 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Paging Source USA, LLC (``Paging Source'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that Paging Source is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011008.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011008.html
  • DISTRIBUTORS, INC. OCN# 6841 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017q NAL/Acct. No. 200132080048 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that R and G Distributors, Inc. (``R and G Distributors'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that R and G Distributors is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011009.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011009.html
  • INC. OCN#s: 2507, 2621, 2508, 2510, 2620, 2506, 3799 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017r NAL/Acct. No. 200132080049 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Trivergent Communications, Inc. (``Trivergent'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that Trivergent is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the North
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011010.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011010.html
  • MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS, INC. II OCN# 6543 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017s NAL/Acct. No. 200132080050 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that USA Mobile Communications, Inc. II (``USA Mobile'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that USA Mobile is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $12,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011011.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011011.html
  • of VANGUARD CELLULAR SYSTEMS, INC. OCN#s: 6383, 6384 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017t NAL/Acct. No. 200132080051 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Vanguard Cellular Systems, Inc. (``Vanguard'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that Vanguard is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $9,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the North
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011012.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da011012.html
  • In the Matter of WINSOME PAGING, INC. OCN# 6918 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017u NAL/Acct. No. 200132080052 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Winsome Paging, Inc. (``Winsome'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that Winsome is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the North
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01991.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01991.html
  • D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ALLPAGE, INC. OCN# 4276 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017 NAL/Acct. No. 200132080031 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Allpage, Inc. (``Allpage'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that Allpage is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the North
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01992.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01992.html
  • of AMERICAN METROCOMM CORP. OCN#s: 8467, 8680, 8675 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017a NAL/Acct. No. 200132080032 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that American Metrocomm Corp. (``American Metrocomm'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that American Metrocomm is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01993.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01993.html
  • of ATX TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, LTD. OCN#s: 7757, 7061 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017b NAL/Acct. No. 200132080033 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that ATX Telecommunications Services, Ltd. (``ATX'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that ATX is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $ 9,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (the ``Act'') grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01994.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01994.html
  • In the Matter of CDS NETWORKS, INC. OCN# 4282 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017c NAL/Acct. No. 200132080034 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that CDS Networks, Inc. (``CDS'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that CDS is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the North
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01995.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01995.html
  • In the Matter of CHICKASAW TELEPHONE CO. OCN# 1980 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017d NAL/Acct. No. 200132080035 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Chickasaw Telephone Co. (``Chickasaw'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that Chickasaw is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the North
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01996.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01996.html
  • In the Matter of CORE COMMUNICATIONS, INC. OCN# 2593 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017e NAL/Acct. No. 200132080036 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Core Communications, Inc. (``Core'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that Core is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the North
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01997.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01997.html
  • the Matter of DIGITAL TELEPORT, INC. OCN# 7102 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017f NAL/Acct. No. 200132080037 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Digital Teleport, Inc. (``Digital Teleport'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that Digital Teleport is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01998.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01998.html
  • D.C. 20554 In the Matter of FULLTEL, INC. OCN# 4589 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017g NAL/Acct. No. 200132080038 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that Fulltel, Inc. (``Fulltel'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that Fulltel is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the North
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01999.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/da01999.html
  • In the Matter of IDS LONG DISTANCE OCN# 8368 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017h NAL/Acct. No. 200132080039 Adopted: April 20, 2001 Released: April 24, 2001 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: Introduction In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL''), we find that IDS Long Distance (``IDS'') has apparently violated 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances in this case, we conclude that IDS is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND Section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''), grants the Commission plenary jurisdiction over the North
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-1073A1.html
  • the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 ) ) In the Matter of ) ) ALLPAGE ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017 OCN# 4276 ) NAL/Acct. No. 200132080031 ) FRN 0004-3752-26 ) ) FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: May 8, 2002 Released: May 10, 2002 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we find that Allpage (``Allpage'') violated 47 C.F.R. 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. We conclude that Allpage is liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND On April 24, 2001, the Chief, Enforcement Bureau, acting pursuant to delegated authority, issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') to Allpage, proposing a $6,000 forfeiture.1 We issued the NAL because
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-1078A1.html
  • ) LITELCO COMMUNICATIONS, INC. ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017i ) NAL/Acct. No. 200132080040 ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: May 8, 2002 Released: May 10, 2002 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Order, we cancel a monetary forfeiture in the amount of $6,000 proposed against Litelco Communications, Inc. (``Litelco'') for apparent willful violations of 47 C.F.R. 52.15(f), which requires certain carriers to report number utilization and forecast data. II. BACKGROUND On April 24, 2001, the Chief, Enforcement Bureau, acting pursuant to delegated authority, issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') to Litelco, proposing a $6,000 forfeiture.1 We issued the NAL because it appeared that Litelco had failed to report on its actual and forecast number
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-1079A1.html
  • Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Order, we deny NECLEC, LLC's (``NECLEC'') request for cancellation and refund of its payment of a $6,000 forfeiture proposed in our Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'').1 In the NAL, we determined that NECLEC willfully failed to report its number utilization and forecast data, which constituted an apparent violation of 47 C.F.R. 52.15(f). For the reasons set forth below, we conclude that NECLEC has not justified its request. II. BACKGROUND On April 24, 2001, the Chief, Enforcement Bureau, acting pursuant to delegated authority, issued the NAL to NECLEC, proposing a $6,000 forfeiture. We issued the NAL because it appeared that NECLEC had failed to report on its actual and forecast number usage by
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-1347A1.html
  • ) CDS NETWORKS, INC. ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017c OCN# 4282 ) NAL/Acct. No. 200132080038 ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: June 7, 2002 Released: June 11, 2002 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Order, we cancel a proposed forfeiture in the amount of $6,000 against CDS Networks, Inc., (``CDS'') for apparent violation of 47 C.F.R. 52.15(f), requiring reports of number utilization and forecast data. II. BACKGROUND On April 24, 2001, the Chief, Enforcement Bureau, acting pursuant to delegated authority, issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') to CDS, proposing a $6,000 forfeiture.1 We issued the NAL because it appeared that CDS had failed to report on its actual and forecast number usage by filing
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-1348A1.html
  • In the Matter of ) ) CHICKASAW TELEPHONE CO. ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017d OCN# 1980 ) NAL/Acct. No. 200132080035 ) FRN 0003-7326-09 ) ) FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: June 7, 2002 Released: June 11, 2002 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture against Chickasaw Telephone Co. (``Chickasaw'') for willful violation of 47 C.F.R. 52.15(f). The noted violation involves Chickasaw's failure to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances of this case, including Chickasaw's response to our Notice of Apparent Liability (``NAL'') ,1 we conclude that Chickasaw has justified a reduction of the proposed forfeiture and that it is liable for a forfeiture in the amount
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-1349A1.html
  • Matter of ) ) DIGITAL TELEPORT, INC. ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017f OCN# 7102 ) NAL/Acct. No. 200132080037 ) FRN 0005-6540-09 ) ) FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: June 7, 2002 Released: June 11, 2002 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture against Digital Teleport, Inc. (``Digital Teleport'') for willful violation of 47 C.F.R. 52.15(f). The noted violation involves Digital Teleport's failure to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances of this case, including Digital Teleport's response to our Notice of Apparent Liability (``NAL''),1 we conclude that Digital Teleport has justified a reduction of the proposed forfeiture and that it is liable for a forfeiture in
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-1350A1.html
  • Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 ) ) In the Matter of ) ) FULLTEL, INC. ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017g OCN# 4589 ) NAL/Acct. No. 200132080038 ) FRN 0006-7988-47 ) ) FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: June 7, 2002 Released: June 11, 2002 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Order, we find that Fulltel, Inc. (``FullTel'') violated 47 C.F.R. 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. We conclude that FullTel is liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND On April 24, 2001, the Chief, Enforcement Bureau, acting pursuant to delegated authority, issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') to FullTel, proposing a $6,000 forfeiture.1 We issued the NAL because
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-1351A1.html
  • In the Matter of ) ) IDS TELCOM, LLC ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017h OCN# 8368 ) NAL/Acct. No. 200132080039 ) FRN 0006-7988-13 ) ) FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: June 20, 2002 Released: June 21, 2002 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture to IDS Telcom, LLC (``IDS'') for willful violation of 47 C.F.R. 52.15(f). The noted violation involves IDS's failure to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances of this case, including IDS's response to our Notice of Apparent Liability (``NAL''),1 we conclude that IDS has justified a reduction of the proposed forfeiture and that it is liable for a forfeiture in the amount of
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-1352A1.html
  • Matter of ) ) R & G DISTRIBUTORS, INC. ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017q OCN# 6841 ) NAL/Acct. No. 200132080048 ) FRN 0003-2716-16 ) ) FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: June 7, 2002 Released: June 11, 2002 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture against R&G Distributors, Inc. (``R&G'') for willful violation of 47 C.F.R. 52.15(f). The noted violation involves R&G's failure to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances of this case, including R&G's response to our Notice of Apparent Liability (``NAL''),1 we conclude that R&G is liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND On April 24, 2001, the Chief, Enforcement Bureau,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-172A1.html
  • 2002 Released: January 23, 2002 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. By this Memorandum Opinion and Order we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau, and OpTel, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, OpTel (Texas) Telecom, Inc. We find that the Consent Decree provides for an appropriate resolution of the Bureau's investigation into OpTel's compliance with section 52.15(f) of the Commission's rules, which requires semi-annual reporting of number utilization and forecast data.1 2. OpTel (Texas) Telecom, Inc. is no longer a regulated provider of local and long-distance telephone services, because it discontinued such services during August of 2001. The Consent Decree provides, however, among other things, that if in the future OpTel provides local or long-distance telephone service
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-172A2.html
  • for protection pursuant to Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. On December 4, 2001, the court presiding over their bankruptcy cases confirmed a plan of reorganization. OpTel, Inc. and certain of its affiliates and subsidiaries, including OpTel (Texas) Telecom, Inc., have effected, or are in the process of effecting, their reorganization pursuant to such confirmed plan. 3. Section 52.15(f) of the Commission's rules requires U.S. carriers receiving numbering resources from the North American Numbering Plan Administrator (``NANPA''), a Pooling Administrator or another telecommunications carrier, to report semiannually on their actual and forecast number usage. These data are to be reported on FCC Form 502, the North American Numbering Plan Numbering Resource Utilization/Forecast (``NRUF'') Report. Carriers and their affiliates and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-235A1.html
  • AND ORDER Adopted: January 30, 2002 Released: February 1, 2002 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. By this Memorandum Opinion and Order we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau, and North County Communications Corp (``NCC''). We find that the Consent Decree provides for an appropriate resolution of the Bureau's investigation into NCC's compliance with section 52.15(f) of the Commission's rules, which requires semi-annual reporting of number utilization and forecast data.1 2. Among other things, the Consent Decree provides that NCC will implement a program to ensure its future compliance with the Act and the Commission's rules and policies. In addition, the Consent Decree provides that NCC will make a voluntary contribution to the United States Treasury
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2002/DA-02-235A2.html
  • competitive local exchange carrier in California, Oregon, Washington and Arizona, providing telecommunications services to its customers. NCC competes directly in major local markets in these states with large incumbent local exchange carriers such as U.S. West for local service customers, as well as with interexchange carriers such as AT&T, Sprint and MCI for long distance telecommunications service customers. 3. Section 52.15(f) of the Commission's rules requires U.S. carriers receiving numbering resources from the North American Numbering Plan Administrator (``NANPA''), a Pooling Administrator or another telecommunications carrier, to report semiannually on their actual and forecast number usage. These data are to be reported on FCC Form 502, the North American Numbering Plan Numbering Resource Utilization/Forecast (``NRUF'') Report. Carriers and their affiliates and
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-361A1.html
  • No. EB-01-IH-0017s II ) NAL/Acct. No. 200132080050 ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: February 5, 2003 Released: February 7, 2003 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we cancel a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'')1 that the Enforcement Bureau issued to USA Mobile Communications, Inc. II (``USA Mobile'') for apparent willful violation of 47 C.F.R. 52.15(f), which requires certain carriers to report number utilization and forecast data. We issued the NAL because it appeared that USA Mobile had failed to report on its actual and forecast number usage by filing FCC Form 502, the North American Numbering Plan Numbering Resource Utilization/Forecast (``NRUF'') Report that was due on September 15, 2000.2 Arch Wireless, Inc. (``Arch'') responded to
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-423A1.html
  • File No. EB-01-IH-0017b SERVICES, LTD. ) NAL/Acct. No. 200132080033 ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: February 12, 2003 Released: February 14, 2003 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: In this Order, we cancel a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'')1 that the Enforcement Bureau issued to ATX Telecommunications Services, Ltd. (``ATX'') for apparent willful violation of 47 C.F.R. 52.15(f), which requires certain carriers to report number utilization and forecast data. We issued the NAL because it appeared that ATX had failed to report on its actual and forecast number usage by filing FCC Form 502, the North American Numbering Plan Numbering Resource Utilization/Forecast (``NRUF'') Report that was due on September 15, 2000.2 ATX responded to the NAL and states
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-424A1.html
  • ) ) In the Matter of ) ) NORTH AMERICAN ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017m TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION ) NAL/Acct. No. 200132080044 OCN# 8770 ) FRN No. 0004375564 ) ) FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: February 12, 2003 Released: February 14, 2003 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Forfeiture Order, we find that North American Telecommunications Corporation (``NATC'') violated 47 C.F.R. 52.15(f) by willfully failing to report its number utilization and forecast data. We conclude that NATC is liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $6,000. II. BACKGROUND On April 24, 2001, the Chief, Enforcement Bureau, acting pursuant to delegated authority, issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') to NATC, proposing a $6,000 forfeiture.1 We issued the NAL because
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-463A1.html
  • ) ) NET-TEL CORPORATION ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017k ) NAL/Acct. No. 200132080042 ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: February 19, 2003 Released: February 21, 2003 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Order, we cancel a monetary forfeiture in the amount of $6,000 proposed against Net-Tel Corporation (``Net-Tel'') for its apparent willful violation of 47 C.F.R. 52.15(f), which requires certain carriers to report number utilization and forecast data. II. BACKGROUND On April 24, 2001, the Chief, Enforcement Bureau, acting pursuant to delegated authority, issued a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (``NAL'') to Net-Tel, proposing a $6,000 forfeiture.1 We issued the NAL because it appeared that Net-Tel had failed to report on its actual and forecast number
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-579A1.html
  • the Matter of ) ) VANGUARD CELLULAR SYSTEMS, INC. ) File No. EB-01-IH-0017t ) NAL/Acct. No. 200132080051 ) FRN No. 0006798052 ) ) FORFEITURE ORDER Adopted: February 26, 2003 Released: February 28, 2003 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION In this Order, we issue a monetary forfeiture against Vanguard Cellular Systems, Inc. (``Vanguard'') for willful violation of 47 C.F.R. 52.15(f). The noted violation involves Vanguard's failure to report its number utilization and forecast data. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances of this case, including the response to our Notice of Apparent Liability (``NAL''),1 we conclude that a reduction of the proposed forfeiture is warranted and that Vanguard is liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $3,000.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-3906A1.html
  • Matter of ) File No. EB-04-IH-0271 ) AT&T Corp. ) Acct. No. 200532080021 ) Compliance with Rules ) FRN: 0005937974 Regarding ) Thousands-Block Number Pooling ORDER Adopted: December 21, 2004 Released: December 21, 2004 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt a Consent Decree terminating an investigation into possible violations by AT&T Corp. (``AT&T'') of sections 52.15 and 52.20(c) of the Commission's rules,1 with respect to thousands-block number pooling in certain rate centers.2 2. The Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and AT&T have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would terminate the Bureau's investigation. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. We have reviewed the terms of the Consent Decree
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-271A1.html
  • ) File No. EB-04-IH-0469 ) MCI, Inc. ) Account No. 200532080120 ) Compliance with Rules Regarding ) FRN No. 0010856284 Thousands-Block Number Pooling ) ) ORDER Adopted: February 2, 2005 Released: February 3, 2005 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt a Consent Decree terminating an investigation into possible violations by MCI, Inc. (``MCI'') of sections 52.15 and 52.20(c) of the Commission's rules,1 with respect to thousands-block number pooling in certain rate centers.2 2. The Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and MCI have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would terminate the Bureau's investigation. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. We have reviewed the terms of the Consent Decree
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/DA-05-409A1.html
  • of. ) ) File No. EB-04-IH-0465 ) Comcast Corporation ) Acct. No. 200532080124 ) Compliance with Rules Regarding ) FRN: 0006329247 Thousands-block Number Pooling ) ORDER Adopted: February 14, 2005 Released: February 15, 2005 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt a Consent Decree terminating an investigation into possible violations by Comcast Corporation (``Comcast'') of sections 52.15 and 52.20(c) of the Commission's rules,1 with respect to thousands-block number pooling in certain rate centers.2 2. The Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') and Comcast have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would terminate the Bureau's investigation. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. We have reviewed the terms of the Consent Decree
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-1268A1.html
  • (Commission established $20,000 as the base forfeiture amount for a carrier's failure to file accurate revenue on FCC Form 497, proposing a $320,000 forfeiture for VCI's sixteen apparent violations); Global NAPs California, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 24 FCC Rcd 13545, 13554-56 P:P: 24-27 (Enf. Bur. 2009) (assessing $25,000 proposed forfeiture against a carrier for apparently violating Section 52.15(f) of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S: 52.15(f), finding that filing of inaccurate reports undermines the Commission's ability to monitor and ensure the efficient allocation of telephone numbering resources) ("Global NAPs California, Inc."); Cardinal Broadband LLC, aka Sovereign Telecommunications, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 23 FCC Rcd 12233, 12235-37 P:P: 6-11 (Enf. Bur. 2008) (assessing a $25,000 forfeiture against an
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-10-2155A1.html
  • Enforcement Bureau: 1. In this Order, we adopt the attached Consent Decree entered into between the Enforcement Bureau (the "Bureau") and PageData LLC ("PageData") and WaveSent LLC ("WaveSent"). The Consent Decree terminates the enforcement proceedings initiated by the Bureau against PageData and WaveSent for possible violation of section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("the Act"), section 52.15(f) of the Commission's rules and Commission orders. 2. The Bureau and PageData and WaveSent have negotiated the terms of the Consent Decree that resolve this matter. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find that the public interest
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/archives/whatsnewarchive05.html
  • | [753]Acrobat 02/01/2005 PLEADING CYCLE ESTABLISHED FOR COMMENTS ON PETITION OF KMC TELECOM OF VIRGINIA, INC., KMC TELECOM V OF VIRGINIA, INC., AND KMC DATA LLC FOR PREEMPTION PURSUANT TO SECTION 252(e)(5) WC Docket No. 05-39. Public Notice: [754]Word | [755]Acrobat 02/01/2005 Administration of the North American Numbering Plan. The Commission grants SBC Internet Services, Inc. a waiver of section 52.15(g)(2)(i) of the Commission's rules. CC Docket No. 99-200 Order: [756]Word | [757]Acrobat Abernathy Statement: [758]Word | [759]Acrobat Copps Statement: [760]Word | [761]Acrobat Adelstein Statement: [762]Word | [763]Acrobat __________________________________________________________________ 01/31/2005 FCC Begins Rulemaking Examining Interstate Special Access Regime. WC Docket No. 05-25 NPRM: [764]Word | [765]Acrobat 01/31/2005 NOTICE OF STREAMLINED DOMESTIC SECTION 214 APPLICATION GRANTED WC Docket No. 04-430. Public Notice:
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/cpd/archive/2005ord.html
  • [495]Word | [496]Acrobat 2/1/05 PUBLIC NOTICE: Inviting Comments on Application of Choice One Communications Inc. on Behalf of Certain of its Subsidiaries to Discontinue Domestic Telecommunications Services. DA No. 05-275. Dkt No 05-38. Comments Due: 02/15/05. [497]Word | [498]Acrobat 2/1/05 ORDER: RE: Administration of the North American Numbering Plan. The Commission grants SBC Internet Services, Inc. a waiver of section 52.15(g)(2)(i) of the Commission's rules. FCC-05-20. Dkt. number(s) 99-200. [499]Word | [500]Acrobat 1/31/05 PUBLIC NOTICE: Notice of Streamlined Domestic 214 Application Granted for for Transfer of Control of Supra Telecommunications and Information Systems, and H.I.G. Supra Inc., Reorganized, DA-05-258, WC Dkt. No. 04-430. Effective Date of Grant: 1/28/05. [501]Word | [502]Acrobat 1/26/05 PUBLIC NOTICE: Streamlined Domestic Section 214 Application filed for
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/cpd/numbering/welcome.html
  • of the 10-digit number system, known as the [42]North American Numbering Plan, through [43]thousands-block number pooling and other measures. * Preventing premature exhaustion of numbers in an area code * Overseeing allocation and management of [44]Toll Free numbers HEADLINES __________________________________________________________________ 01/09/2012 Wireline Competition Bureau grants 14-day extention of the current deadline to update record regarding petitions for waiver of Section 52.15(g)(2)(i) of the Commission's rules. CC Docket No. 99-200. DA 12-26 Public Notice: [45]Word | [46]Acrobat 12/27/11 Wireline Competition Bureau Seeks to refresh record on petitions for waiver of Commission's rules regarding access to numbering resources. CC Docket No. 99-200. DA 11-2074 Public Notice: [47]Word | [48]Acrobat 12/21/11 Wireline Competition Bureau Seeks Comment on Montana Public Service Commission's Petition for Delegated